ROL_2022-08-18_16k.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.500 --> 00:09.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.500 --> 00:11.000] Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.500 --> 00:18.500] Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.500 --> 00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:26.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.500 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.500 --> 00:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:45.500] Start over with Startpage.
[00:45.500 --> 00:47.500] Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.500 --> 00:51.000] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.000] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.000 --> 00:56.500] Spar with an extra P.
[00:56.500 --> 01:03.000] S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:08.500] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:08.500 --> 01:10.500] But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.500 --> 01:14.500] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.500 --> 01:17.500] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:17.500 --> 01:21.000] we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.000 --> 01:30.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:30.500 --> 01:34.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.500 --> 01:38.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.000 --> 01:39.500] Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.500 --> 01:43.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:43.000 --> 01:46.000] to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.000 --> 01:48.000] Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.000 --> 01:51.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.500 --> 01:56.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.500 --> 01:58.000] So protect your rights.
[01:58.000 --> 02:01.500] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.500 --> 02:04.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:08.000 --> 02:12.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.000 --> 02:15.500] Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.500 --> 02:19.500] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms
[02:19.500 --> 02:22.000] around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.000 --> 02:26.000] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms,
[02:26.000 --> 02:30.000] arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.000 --> 02:33.500] Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.500 --> 02:37.500] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.500 --> 02:38.500] when he said,
[02:38.500 --> 02:43.500] The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[02:43.500 --> 02:47.500] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America,
[02:47.500 --> 02:51.000] but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:51.000 --> 03:14.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:21.000 --> 03:27.500] Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do?
[03:27.500 --> 03:30.500] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:30.500 --> 03:33.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:33.000 --> 03:36.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:36.000 --> 03:38.500] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:38.500 --> 03:41.500] When you were eight and you had bad traits,
[03:41.500 --> 03:44.000] you'd go to school and learn the golden rules.
[03:44.000 --> 03:47.000] So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[03:47.000 --> 03:49.500] If you get hot, then you must just cool.
[03:49.500 --> 03:52.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:52.000 --> 03:54.500] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:54.500 --> 03:57.500] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:57.500 --> 04:00.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:00.000 --> 04:02.500] You chucket on that one, you chucket on this one,
[04:02.500 --> 04:05.500] you chucket on your mother and you chucket on your father,
[04:05.500 --> 04:08.000] you chucket on your father and you chucket on your sliver,
[04:08.000 --> 04:10.500] you chucket on-
[04:12.000 --> 04:17.000] Okay, howdy, howdy, this is Randy Kelvin Bret Fountain
[04:17.000 --> 04:22.000] and oh my goodness, Brett forgot to tell me what day it is.
[04:22.420 --> 04:23.980] No he didn't, he lied to me and said
[04:23.980 --> 04:25.380] it was sometime in September.
[04:26.700 --> 04:30.280] That's what he does to us, that's his form of elder abuse.
[04:31.920 --> 04:37.000] It is the 18th day of August 2022
[04:38.800 --> 04:40.940] and we plan on having a good time today.
[04:40.940 --> 04:45.940] I have been preparing legal documents all day.
[04:45.940 --> 04:49.760] I have sued the justice of the peace in Whitaker.
[04:51.860 --> 04:54.740] I have sued the justice of the peace in Victoria County
[04:56.180 --> 04:58.180] and his name is Bob Whitaker.
[04:59.360 --> 05:03.460] Brett, is it okay to say on the air that we sued a judge,
[05:03.460 --> 05:07.140] a justice of the peace named Bob Whitaker?
[05:09.140 --> 05:10.860] Well let him have it.
[05:10.860 --> 05:15.780] Okay, he's not a bad guy, as far as I can tell.
[05:15.780 --> 05:17.700] He's just doing his job and doing his job
[05:17.700 --> 05:20.220] the way he's been trained to do his job.
[05:20.220 --> 05:23.540] Some jack leg come along and threw a banana peel
[05:23.540 --> 05:27.140] in front of him and for all the stuff I'm gonna do
[05:27.140 --> 05:29.180] to Bob Whitaker, I have no reason to believe
[05:29.180 --> 05:32.820] that he's not a well-intended
[05:32.820 --> 05:34.660] and well-meaning public official.
[05:36.020 --> 05:38.100] And that's part of the problem.
[05:38.100 --> 05:38.940] Yeah, exactly.
[05:38.940 --> 05:40.780] With the problem.
[05:40.780 --> 05:43.060] You got these guys who think they're good guys
[05:43.060 --> 05:44.940] and they wanna be good guys
[05:44.940 --> 05:48.700] and they feel like good guys and they've been doing what,
[05:48.700 --> 05:51.420] yeah, they've been doing what they've been doing
[05:51.420 --> 05:53.780] for years and years and years
[05:53.780 --> 05:55.140] and they work with all these other people
[05:55.140 --> 05:56.380] who've been doing the same thing
[05:56.380 --> 05:58.180] and they all think they're good guys
[05:58.180 --> 06:00.140] and they all wanna be good guys.
[06:00.140 --> 06:03.740] And then they have this unknown outsider
[06:03.740 --> 06:06.780] from Podunk, Texas come along
[06:06.780 --> 06:10.140] and tell them they're doing everything wrong.
[06:10.140 --> 06:15.140] Well, we run into this cognitive dissonance.
[06:15.780 --> 06:18.300] I have a justice of the peace,
[06:18.300 --> 06:20.380] who was a personal friend of mine
[06:21.900 --> 06:23.100] and a Baptist preacher,
[06:23.100 --> 06:24.900] but I didn't hold that against him.
[06:26.020 --> 06:30.220] Tell me, Mr. Kelton, are you,
[06:30.220 --> 06:32.900] at the time he was a justice of the peace,
[06:32.900 --> 06:36.020] are you telling me that everything that I have been doing
[06:36.020 --> 06:38.180] for 20 years as a peace officer
[06:38.180 --> 06:41.620] and now 13 years as a justice of the peace is wrong?
[06:42.460 --> 06:45.340] Everything everybody in Texas has been doing
[06:45.340 --> 06:47.740] for the last 30 years is wrong and you're right.
[06:49.860 --> 06:52.220] I said, don't ask me, Mark.
[06:52.220 --> 06:53.580] I didn't write the code.
[06:53.580 --> 06:56.140] I just read it, here it is.
[06:56.140 --> 06:58.500] Black and white, clear as day.
[06:58.500 --> 07:00.300] So this is what we're dealing with.
[07:02.300 --> 07:03.740] I spent some time in combat
[07:03.740 --> 07:08.740] and in combat, the enemy was clearly defined.
[07:11.060 --> 07:12.180] Although this was Vietnam
[07:12.180 --> 07:14.380] and the lines got blurred sometimes
[07:15.220 --> 07:18.900] between civilians and combatants,
[07:18.900 --> 07:23.900] but that was not a major issue.
[07:24.940 --> 07:28.140] We knew that the North Vietnamese were our enemy,
[07:28.140 --> 07:30.260] the South Vietnamese were our friends,
[07:30.260 --> 07:32.700] or at least that's what they told us.
[07:32.700 --> 07:36.180] And we knew who we were fighting and who we weren't.
[07:37.220 --> 07:42.220] And we weren't fighting the guy next to us,
[07:42.740 --> 07:45.300] the guy across the street or the people at home
[07:45.300 --> 07:48.980] that we cared about and that we grew up around.
[07:48.980 --> 07:51.980] We were fighting foreigners halfway around the planet.
[07:53.140 --> 07:56.780] Here, we have an intractable enemy
[07:56.780 --> 07:59.100] that doesn't even know it's an enemy.
[07:59.100 --> 08:01.180] They think you're good guys.
[08:02.460 --> 08:04.620] And when we come in and tell these people
[08:04.620 --> 08:08.620] that what you've been doing all these years is wrong
[08:09.500 --> 08:13.500] and you are a horrible criminal for doing all these things,
[08:15.220 --> 08:19.220] we get surprised that they are not accommodating to us.
[08:20.980 --> 08:22.700] Well, I'm not surprised anymore.
[08:22.700 --> 08:26.100] And when I go into these places,
[08:26.100 --> 08:29.660] I have developed some methodologies.
[08:29.660 --> 08:33.660] The first thing I want to do is laugh and joke with them
[08:33.660 --> 08:37.660] and treat them with dignity and respect
[08:37.660 --> 08:42.100] and apologize to them when I have to stick my legal boot
[08:42.100 --> 08:43.900] up their professional behinds.
[08:47.100 --> 08:50.100] That all kind of goes to neuro-linguistic programming.
[08:50.100 --> 08:55.100] Kind of keep them off balance.
[08:56.820 --> 09:00.940] So in this case, I'm going after Judge Whitaker.
[09:00.940 --> 09:04.100] I went down and filed some complaints with him
[09:04.100 --> 09:06.420] and I'm sure you've all heard that story.
[09:06.420 --> 09:10.140] And he refused to even read them.
[09:10.140 --> 09:13.300] I didn't remember that he said that.
[09:13.300 --> 09:16.500] The only thing you need to record your interactions
[09:16.500 --> 09:20.140] because in the heat of the moment, you're so busy
[09:21.300 --> 09:25.340] trying to formulate the correct responses and such
[09:26.380 --> 09:30.780] that you don't have time to log all of your memory.
[09:30.780 --> 09:31.620] Right.
[09:32.620 --> 09:33.900] You'll notice a lot of things
[09:33.900 --> 09:37.900] after you listen to your recording, you realize, oh yeah.
[09:37.900 --> 09:39.980] Oh, oh yeah, that was said too.
[09:40.820 --> 09:44.780] Yeah, so I listened to my recording
[09:44.780 --> 09:48.340] and I thought he said, I'm not going to sign these
[09:48.340 --> 09:49.660] and threw them down.
[09:49.660 --> 09:51.420] That's what was in my mind
[09:51.420 --> 09:53.860] because that's what I wanted him to do.
[09:53.860 --> 09:55.020] That's not what he said.
[09:56.140 --> 09:58.300] When I listened to the recording, he said,
[09:58.300 --> 10:02.580] since you're not a lawyer, I'm not going to read these.
[10:03.940 --> 10:08.940] Holy moly, I almost couldn't believe he said that
[10:10.300 --> 10:11.580] but he said that.
[10:11.580 --> 10:16.580] But to his credit, he thought I was just some
[10:17.180 --> 10:22.180] jackleg Republic of Texas, pro se reactionary
[10:22.860 --> 10:24.900] just coming down, trying to start trouble.
[10:26.900 --> 10:28.060] And I understand that.
[10:29.180 --> 10:31.780] We have a lot of guys out there giving that impression.
[10:32.700 --> 10:35.860] And he's on one side of this issue, I'm on the other
[10:35.860 --> 10:40.860] and we tend to judge the other side by our standards
[10:42.420 --> 10:45.780] instead of understanding their standards.
[10:47.140 --> 10:50.020] Makes me, I'm not particularly religious
[10:50.020 --> 10:53.540] but it makes me recognize the wisdom
[10:54.620 --> 10:58.900] in judge not that you be not judged
[11:00.140 --> 11:04.220] because your perspective may be a bit shallow.
[11:04.220 --> 11:05.940] So I've been doing this quite a while.
[11:05.940 --> 11:10.220] So it's helped me have enough experience
[11:10.220 --> 11:12.700] and time to adjust my perspective.
[11:12.700 --> 11:15.900] Okay, I understand that Judge Riddicker
[11:15.900 --> 11:17.980] may not be the enemy.
[11:17.980 --> 11:19.180] Absolutely, he's not the enemy.
[11:19.180 --> 11:21.100] He's a good guy.
[11:21.100 --> 11:23.940] He's just been trained to do it the wrong way.
[11:23.940 --> 11:28.940] So how do you do this when you're trying to get good guys
[11:29.380 --> 11:32.900] or people who think of themselves as good guys
[11:32.900 --> 11:36.060] to change their behavior so they really do become good guys?
[11:37.780 --> 11:41.020] Well, sometimes you have to sting them a bit.
[11:41.020 --> 11:43.420] And this is a good way to put it.
[11:43.420 --> 11:45.900] Because he doesn't know he's not the good guy.
[11:45.900 --> 11:48.540] He would like to be the good guy.
[11:48.540 --> 11:51.780] And he's not gonna listen to any training you have for him
[11:51.780 --> 11:53.260] because he thinks he knows.
[11:54.820 --> 11:55.660] Yeah.
[11:55.660 --> 11:58.260] The stinging is really the only thing that works.
[11:58.260 --> 12:03.260] But then again, you and I, we think we're the good guys.
[12:03.860 --> 12:05.820] And we think we're doing it right.
[12:07.300 --> 12:10.020] And what are you gonna do, Brett, if I come to you
[12:10.020 --> 12:12.100] and say, hey, what you're doing is all screwed up.
[12:12.100 --> 12:15.580] All this stuff you think you know is a bunch of garbage.
[12:15.580 --> 12:17.980] You know, we do that to the patriot mythologists.
[12:18.900 --> 12:21.300] And we wonder why they resist us.
[12:22.860 --> 12:26.340] They've studied and they've worked and they've researched
[12:26.340 --> 12:28.300] and they've come to all these conclusions
[12:28.300 --> 12:31.100] and we come in and tell them, you guys got to be kidding.
[12:32.220 --> 12:36.060] You can't really believe that crap a lot.
[12:36.060 --> 12:37.300] Yeah, you're a moron.
[12:39.620 --> 12:42.300] And they tend not to take that well.
[12:42.300 --> 12:44.220] We shouldn't be surprised by that.
[12:46.260 --> 12:50.380] Part of it is humans heard.
[12:50.380 --> 12:52.020] We gather together in groups.
[12:52.900 --> 12:55.260] And my group's better than your group.
[12:55.260 --> 13:00.260] We gather together in big groups like well-believing God.
[13:01.340 --> 13:03.300] And then smaller groups.
[13:04.220 --> 13:07.100] Some of us believe in the Catholic God
[13:07.100 --> 13:09.460] and some of us believe in the Protestant God.
[13:10.700 --> 13:13.220] Okay, and then when we get to the Protestant God,
[13:14.580 --> 13:16.380] that just really gets out of hand.
[13:18.180 --> 13:21.580] Each one of us, the Baptist, the Methodist,
[13:21.580 --> 13:25.260] the Jehovah Witnesses, the Seventh-day Adventists,
[13:25.260 --> 13:26.700] we all think we're right.
[13:28.100 --> 13:30.900] That we are all acting in the best of faith
[13:30.900 --> 13:35.900] toward our beliefs, doing what the Bible tells us to do.
[13:38.300 --> 13:43.180] But we can't all be right all the time.
[13:44.260 --> 13:48.620] So, how do we shift the Irish breath
[13:48.620 --> 13:53.620] and get out of combat mode and get into a mode
[13:54.660 --> 13:57.500] to where we understand that our enemy
[13:58.540 --> 14:03.020] is only slightly our enemy?
[14:04.300 --> 14:09.060] Is only someone who has differences between us
[14:09.060 --> 14:11.380] that are extremely minor.
[14:11.380 --> 14:13.140] What do you mean slightly enemy?
[14:14.220 --> 14:16.660] Well, we're all Americans.
[14:16.660 --> 14:19.260] We all believe in the American form of government.
[14:19.260 --> 14:21.020] We all believe in freedom.
[14:22.020 --> 14:27.020] But some of us believe in a little bit different freedoms.
[14:28.060 --> 14:30.380] You should have freedom of religion
[14:30.380 --> 14:32.660] so long as your religion agrees with my religion.
[14:32.660 --> 14:34.260] If you don't agree with my religion,
[14:34.260 --> 14:37.100] then I'm sorry, Bubba, if you're going to hell.
[14:40.020 --> 14:43.060] And this is such a minor difference,
[14:43.060 --> 14:46.860] but it's the only difference we've got.
[14:46.860 --> 14:50.980] So we tend to explode it and blow it up into something
[14:50.980 --> 14:54.300] way beyond proportion.
[14:54.300 --> 14:57.140] You're a Muslim.
[14:57.140 --> 15:00.020] You believe in the same God I do,
[15:00.020 --> 15:02.860] but how dare you believe in the same God I do
[15:02.860 --> 15:05.220] different than I believe in the same God I do.
[15:07.660 --> 15:09.860] Consider how you think about Muslims.
[15:09.860 --> 15:14.860] And we have some Christian right-wing extremists
[15:14.860 --> 15:17.180] who blow up black churches
[15:17.180 --> 15:22.180] and we look down on them as lesser human beings.
[15:22.180 --> 15:27.180] And the Muslims have some Muslim extremists
[15:27.180 --> 15:28.700] who do bad stuff.
[15:29.700 --> 15:34.700] And the Muslims struggle to deal with that garbage.
[15:34.700 --> 15:37.020] And then they have to deal with Christians
[15:37.020 --> 15:42.020] who group all the Muslims in the same group.
[15:42.300 --> 15:45.860] They don't make these distinctions between Muslims
[15:45.860 --> 15:50.860] who believe that you are who you are based on your behavior,
[15:52.820 --> 15:56.820] that you are responsible for your behavior.
[15:56.820 --> 16:01.820] I listened to Eric Farrakhan.
[16:01.820 --> 16:06.820] And he was promoted, at the time,
[16:06.820 --> 16:10.820] he was considered to be a radical religious wacko.
[16:11.820 --> 16:15.300] And then I listened to him and he said,
[16:15.300 --> 16:17.460] if you're a Muslim man,
[16:17.460 --> 16:21.340] it is your duty to take care of your family
[16:21.340 --> 16:23.740] and do things right and be righteous.
[16:23.740 --> 16:26.540] He didn't talk about any of this radical
[16:26.540 --> 16:28.660] killing other people nonsense.
[16:28.660 --> 16:31.980] And everything he said, I agreed with.
[16:31.980 --> 16:34.380] So I get one or two things I don't agree with
[16:34.380 --> 16:36.380] and then I demonize the whole thing.
[16:37.380 --> 16:40.380] I get to rail in righteous indignation
[16:40.380 --> 16:45.380] and condemn them all.
[16:49.380 --> 16:51.380] I'm kind of getting out of often left field here.
[16:51.380 --> 16:54.380] I'll get straightened out when I get back.
[16:54.380 --> 16:59.380] I'll get straightened out when I get back.
[17:24.580 --> 17:26.580] How to answer letters and phone calls.
[17:26.580 --> 17:29.180] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[17:29.180 --> 17:31.100] How to turn the financial tables on them
[17:31.100 --> 17:33.860] and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.860 --> 17:36.780] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution
[17:36.780 --> 17:38.700] for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.700 --> 17:41.100] Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:41.100 --> 17:44.460] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[17:44.460 --> 17:46.740] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:46.740 --> 17:49.500] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[17:49.500 --> 17:51.900] That's ruleoflawradio.com
[17:51.900 --> 17:56.900] or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-n at yahoo.com
[17:57.380 --> 17:59.940] to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[18:01.540 --> 18:04.340] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God
[18:04.340 --> 18:06.660] and a better understanding of his word?
[18:06.660 --> 18:09.740] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays
[18:09.740 --> 18:12.980] from eight to 10 p.m. Central Time for scripture talk
[18:12.980 --> 18:15.500] where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures
[18:15.500 --> 18:18.260] in accord with 2nd Timothy 2.15.
[18:18.260 --> 18:20.580] Study to show thyself approved unto God,
[18:20.580 --> 18:22.700] a workman that needed not to be ashamed,
[18:22.700 --> 18:25.140] rightly dividing the word of truth.
[18:25.140 --> 18:27.620] Starting in January, our first hour studies
[18:27.620 --> 18:30.180] are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse by verse
[18:30.180 --> 18:32.700] and discuss the true gospel message.
[18:32.700 --> 18:35.540] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week
[18:35.540 --> 18:37.420] with discussions on sound doctrine
[18:37.420 --> 18:39.700] and Christian character development.
[18:39.700 --> 18:42.220] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing
[18:42.220 --> 18:44.220] to all those with a hearing ear.
[18:44.220 --> 18:46.060] Our goal is to strengthen our faith
[18:46.060 --> 18:48.700] and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[18:48.700 --> 18:50.780] of our Lord and Savior, Jesus.
[18:50.780 --> 18:54.460] So tune in to scripture talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[18:54.460 --> 18:56.660] Wednesdays from eight to 10 p.m.
[18:56.660 --> 18:59.820] to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[19:01.260 --> 19:06.260] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[19:06.260 --> 19:09.060] LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:09.060 --> 19:27.460] Look what we've got in the eyes of the Christian.
[19:27.460 --> 19:32.540] Don't know what I didn't have answered.
[19:32.540 --> 19:34.900] Don't know what I didn't have answered.
[19:34.900 --> 19:37.940] Don't know what I didn't have answered.
[19:37.940 --> 19:42.540] Look what we've got in the eyes of the Christian.
[19:42.540 --> 19:45.540] Don't know what I didn't have answered.
[19:45.540 --> 19:48.540] Don't know what I didn't have answered.
[19:48.540 --> 19:51.540] Don't know what I didn't have answered.
[19:51.540 --> 19:53.220] Okay, we are back.
[19:53.220 --> 19:55.740] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[19:55.740 --> 19:57.860] Brett's just turned the phone lines on.
[19:57.860 --> 20:02.740] A call in number 512-646-1984.
[20:02.740 --> 20:06.420] And I was kind of rambling around in that segment
[20:06.420 --> 20:11.420] because I was trying to formulate a way to say something
[20:13.060 --> 20:15.140] that I haven't been talking about a lot
[20:15.140 --> 20:17.980] and that's just been on my mind a lot
[20:17.980 --> 20:19.780] but I haven't brought it to the air.
[20:21.580 --> 20:24.420] It is in the nature of human beings
[20:25.340 --> 20:29.340] to separate themselves together in groups
[20:30.900 --> 20:35.900] and then challenge the opposing groups.
[20:35.900 --> 20:40.140] I guess maybe that keeps us sharp and keeps us on our toes
[20:40.140 --> 20:43.940] but it also can become extremely divisive.
[20:45.020 --> 20:49.180] And we can look around at the world
[20:49.180 --> 20:52.820] and the world has all of these problems and issues
[20:52.820 --> 20:57.820] and once we tend to get control of those problems and issues
[20:58.060 --> 21:02.420] we look to smaller and smaller divisions
[21:02.420 --> 21:05.100] over which to find controversy.
[21:06.420 --> 21:10.940] I'm taking on Victoria County but I do not believe
[21:10.940 --> 21:13.700] that the people I'm taking on in Victoria County
[21:13.700 --> 21:15.100] are basically bad guys.
[21:16.740 --> 21:18.740] They're just people like the rest of us.
[21:19.940 --> 21:23.180] And each of them are in their own individual position
[21:23.180 --> 21:25.100] and if we are to be effective
[21:26.380 --> 21:31.380] and if we are to take this system to a better place
[21:31.380 --> 21:34.300] we first need to throw out this notion
[21:34.300 --> 21:36.060] of good guys and bad guys.
[21:37.780 --> 21:40.300] And anybody who listens to this show
[21:40.300 --> 21:41.860] knows I'm not particularly religious
[21:41.860 --> 21:44.860] but I consider the Bible as a text containing
[21:49.860 --> 21:53.860] 6,000 years of knowledge
[21:53.860 --> 21:58.860] of how to live with human beings and it's extremely valuable
[22:00.860 --> 22:04.500] and when it says, judge not that you be not judged
[22:04.500 --> 22:07.140] I don't put a religious context to that.
[22:08.140 --> 22:10.220] That's just a good idea.
[22:11.140 --> 22:12.540] It works well.
[22:13.340 --> 22:18.340] If I can't determine that Robert will be a good guy
[22:18.340 --> 22:23.340] it works well, if I can't determine that Robert Whitaker
[22:24.380 --> 22:26.940] is some kind of no good rotten criminal
[22:26.940 --> 22:31.940] that belongs in prison, if I can't make that determination
[22:33.060 --> 22:37.580] okay maybe God and Jesus can but I can't do that.
[22:37.580 --> 22:39.460] I've been warned about that.
[22:39.460 --> 22:43.660] So if I can't judge him, how do I deal with him?
[22:43.660 --> 22:48.660] Well, I think he's wrong and if I think he's wrong
[22:52.820 --> 22:57.820] that kind of implies that or imposes upon me the duty
[23:01.380 --> 23:06.380] to understand how he's wrong and how to correct the wrong.
[23:06.500 --> 23:11.500] How to adjust his reasoning so that he comes to a place
[23:11.500 --> 23:16.500] that's less wrong or am I the one that's wrong?
[23:20.420 --> 23:22.260] And for me that's always a struggle.
[23:23.660 --> 23:27.180] I've been producing some documents for Robert Whitaker.
[23:28.140 --> 23:32.260] He responded to my suit against him
[23:32.260 --> 23:37.060] and I've been developing a rebuttal to his response
[23:37.060 --> 23:42.060] and I'm struggling and in struggling to find a response
[23:45.260 --> 23:46.980] I found some really cool ones.
[23:48.700 --> 23:53.700] One of the main ones is as I continued to study
[23:54.780 --> 23:58.580] it turned out to be essentially wrong
[24:01.100 --> 24:03.580] but I'm not gonna tell him that.
[24:03.580 --> 24:07.780] I'm gonna let him figure it out.
[24:09.700 --> 24:13.500] He has claimed here through his lawyer
[24:13.500 --> 24:18.220] that he is a judicial officer in the state of Texas
[24:18.220 --> 24:21.780] and judicial officers are absolutely immune
[24:21.780 --> 24:24.260] from civil litigation no matter what.
[24:26.140 --> 24:26.980] And I'm saying-
[24:26.980 --> 24:28.820] Oh, is that a fact?
[24:28.820 --> 24:30.580] Is that a fact, Jack?
[24:30.580 --> 24:33.420] So I took that on.
[24:33.420 --> 24:37.180] He filed this motion that he captioned it
[24:37.180 --> 24:41.780] as a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction
[24:41.780 --> 24:44.100] and original answer.
[24:45.540 --> 24:48.140] Okay guys, this is gonna get a little bit complex
[24:48.140 --> 24:49.660] and I don't know about you
[24:49.660 --> 24:54.460] but I really like these very complex issues.
[24:54.460 --> 24:59.460] We do a deeper dive into how law works.
[25:00.700 --> 25:02.700] Most of us spend most of our time
[25:02.700 --> 25:05.300] on the surface of legal issues
[25:05.300 --> 25:10.300] and we don't dig down to the more finite refinements.
[25:13.780 --> 25:18.180] And here he said that under,
[25:21.100 --> 25:24.220] was it Texas Civil Torts and Remedies,
[25:24.220 --> 25:29.220] I think it is, 101 that judges have absolute immunity
[25:32.820 --> 25:35.180] and therefore I had no claim against him.
[25:36.060 --> 25:38.700] And I said, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[25:38.700 --> 25:42.340] Chapter 101, there's a caveat in there
[25:42.340 --> 25:47.340] that says chapter 101 is not an exclusive remedy
[25:47.340 --> 25:52.340] that it is a remedy in addition to all other remedies.
[25:54.860 --> 25:59.860] Now the defendants lawyer proposed to the judge
[26:02.660 --> 26:07.660] that rule 101, that the remedies in 101
[26:07.980 --> 26:10.060] was the exclusive remedy.
[26:11.420 --> 26:14.580] And since I didn't have a remedy under 101,
[26:14.580 --> 26:15.420] I had no remedy.
[26:15.420 --> 26:18.100] If I had a remedy under 101, I had no remedy at all.
[26:19.540 --> 26:21.940] And I said, maybe not.
[26:21.940 --> 26:25.180] So he, I took that on.
[26:25.180 --> 26:30.180] It was really fun taking on this really fine point of law.
[26:31.500 --> 26:33.180] This is how we get better.
[26:34.020 --> 26:38.300] This is how we increase our sharpness.
[26:38.300 --> 26:42.300] And in this case, I don't expect to win
[26:42.300 --> 26:43.580] at the end of the day.
[26:43.580 --> 26:48.580] And I'm saying that considering that my opponent
[26:49.740 --> 26:53.300] may actually be listening to this broadcast.
[26:54.940 --> 26:55.820] And that's okay.
[26:57.940 --> 27:01.180] You'll better understand where I'm at.
[27:01.180 --> 27:05.940] I may not win at the end of the day before the US Supreme.
[27:07.180 --> 27:10.140] I suspect if I get to the US Supreme,
[27:10.140 --> 27:11.980] they will deny my search.
[27:11.980 --> 27:15.980] But there's a good chance even when I get to the state
[27:15.980 --> 27:19.380] Supreme that the state Supreme will deny my search.
[27:20.940 --> 27:22.180] Search your way.
[27:22.180 --> 27:24.740] That's what they call an appeal to the Supremes.
[27:26.820 --> 27:30.820] But by me saying that, they know full well
[27:32.140 --> 27:34.940] that this is not gonna be easy.
[27:36.380 --> 27:40.100] That everything I'm doing at this point
[27:40.100 --> 27:45.100] at this point is done in order to better my position
[27:47.020 --> 27:48.940] when I get before the Supreme.
[27:50.900 --> 27:55.060] And then the defendant is looking at
[27:55.060 --> 27:58.460] how can I make this go away as quickly as possible?
[27:59.540 --> 28:00.820] How can I just end this?
[28:00.820 --> 28:04.380] So he files this challenge to subject matter jurisdiction
[28:04.380 --> 28:05.580] and original answer.
[28:05.580 --> 28:10.580] Okay, challenge to subject matter jurisdiction.
[28:11.580 --> 28:16.580] He claimed that under 101, the judge had absolute immunity.
[28:20.140 --> 28:22.420] And I said, are you kidding me?
[28:23.820 --> 28:27.140] You're saying that when someone becomes a judge,
[28:27.140 --> 28:31.420] he is taken out of the legal structure
[28:31.420 --> 28:34.500] and is exempt from all of the laws.
[28:34.500 --> 28:39.500] He can do anything he wants to
[28:40.620 --> 28:45.300] and he is absolutely immune from any consequences.
[28:46.460 --> 28:47.300] So I know that.
[28:47.300 --> 28:49.100] I love the law.
[28:49.100 --> 28:51.980] Yeah, and we know that's not so.
[28:51.980 --> 28:54.540] Because we see in what Brett and I do,
[28:54.540 --> 28:57.060] we see judges that get clobbered all the time
[28:58.260 --> 29:00.780] and ask any municipal judge,
[29:00.780 --> 29:03.820] do they think they're absolutely immune?
[29:03.820 --> 29:05.420] They don't.
[29:05.420 --> 29:07.620] They're always worried about getting sued.
[29:08.500 --> 29:10.100] Problem with getting sued,
[29:11.100 --> 29:14.860] even if you're a judge, even if you win, you lose.
[29:16.260 --> 29:17.780] I sued Judge Riddicker
[29:17.780 --> 29:21.380] and he has zero counterclaim against me.
[29:22.940 --> 29:24.540] I can't lose.
[29:25.780 --> 29:27.420] I can only not win
[29:27.420 --> 29:32.420] so long as I craft well pleaded issues,
[29:33.220 --> 29:35.780] then I don't have to worry about allegations
[29:35.780 --> 29:37.540] of a frivolous pleadings.
[29:38.820 --> 29:41.660] And in that case, he can only lose.
[29:41.660 --> 29:45.020] He gets to determine how much he wants to lose.
[29:45.020 --> 29:47.100] And when I tell him I'm taking him to the Supreme
[29:47.100 --> 29:48.820] and I absolutely am,
[29:48.820 --> 29:50.660] that tells him he's gonna lose a whole lot
[29:50.660 --> 29:52.820] even if he wins at the end of the day.
[29:52.820 --> 29:54.700] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[29:54.700 --> 29:57.700] we'll be right back.
[29:57.700 --> 30:00.700] Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information
[30:00.700 --> 30:02.700] and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:02.700 --> 30:05.300] But it turns out that even the most trusted companies
[30:05.300 --> 30:08.100] may be unwittingly revealing your secrets.
[30:08.100 --> 30:09.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[30:09.300 --> 30:11.700] and I'll be right back with details.
[30:11.700 --> 30:13.700] Privacy is under attack.
[30:13.700 --> 30:15.700] When you give up data about yourself,
[30:15.700 --> 30:17.300] you'll never get it back again.
[30:17.300 --> 30:19.100] And once your privacy is gone,
[30:19.100 --> 30:22.300] you'll find your freedoms will start to disappear.
[30:22.300 --> 30:25.300] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[30:25.300 --> 30:27.700] and keep your information to yourself.
[30:27.700 --> 30:30.300] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:30.300 --> 30:31.700] This public service announcement
[30:31.700 --> 30:33.900] is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:33.900 --> 30:35.700] the private search engine alternative
[30:35.700 --> 30:37.900] to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[30:37.900 --> 30:40.300] Start over with StartPage.
[30:41.500 --> 30:43.300] Data privacy is a big deal.
[30:43.300 --> 30:45.500] So nearly every company has a policy
[30:45.500 --> 30:48.300] explaining how they handle your personal information.
[30:48.300 --> 30:50.300] But what happens when data is lost?
[30:50.300 --> 30:52.300] It's not an idle question.
[30:52.300 --> 30:53.700] According to a recent survey,
[30:53.700 --> 30:56.300] a shocking 90% of U.S. companies
[30:56.300 --> 30:58.900] admit their security was breached by hackers
[30:58.900 --> 31:00.300] in the last year.
[31:00.300 --> 31:02.700] That's one more reason you should trust your searches
[31:02.700 --> 31:04.300] to StartPage.com.
[31:04.300 --> 31:05.700] Unlike other search engines,
[31:05.700 --> 31:08.300] StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:08.300 --> 31:10.700] They've never been hacked, but even if they were,
[31:10.700 --> 31:12.700] there would be nothing for criminals to see.
[31:12.700 --> 31:14.300] The cupboard would be bare.
[31:14.300 --> 31:16.300] Too bad other companies don't treat your data
[31:16.300 --> 31:18.300] the same way they do your privacy.
[31:18.300 --> 31:20.300] Too bad other companies don't treat your data
[31:20.300 --> 31:21.900] the same way.
[31:21.900 --> 31:23.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:23.300 --> 31:49.300] For more news and information, at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:54.300 --> 31:55.300] My uncle.
[31:55.300 --> 31:56.300] My nephew.
[31:56.300 --> 31:57.300] My son.
[31:57.300 --> 31:58.300] Go to buildingwatch.org.
[31:58.300 --> 31:59.300] Why it sells.
[31:59.300 --> 32:00.300] Why it matters.
[32:00.300 --> 32:02.300] And what you can do.
[32:02.300 --> 32:04.300] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer
[32:04.300 --> 32:06.300] the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:06.300 --> 32:08.300] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:08.300 --> 32:10.300] And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.300 --> 32:13.300] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.300 --> 32:16.300] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.300 --> 32:18.300] the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.300 --> 32:20.300] and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.300 --> 32:22.300] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:22.300 --> 32:25.300] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.300 --> 32:28.300] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.300 --> 32:31.300] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.300 --> 32:33.300] that will help you understand what due process is
[32:33.300 --> 32:35.300] and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.300 --> 32:37.300] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:37.300 --> 32:40.300] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.300 --> 32:42.300] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:42.300 --> 32:45.300] The Texas Transportation Code, A Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.300 --> 32:47.300] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.300 --> 32:50.300] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.300 --> 32:54.300] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.300 --> 32:59.300] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.300 --> 33:07.300] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:13.300 --> 33:17.300] Yes, Mr. Officer, you're taking the line ahead.
[33:19.300 --> 33:22.300] I want you to follow the law of the land.
[33:23.300 --> 33:25.300] I don't understand.
[33:25.300 --> 33:28.300] We promise to protect the service.
[33:29.300 --> 33:31.300] Not beat and abuse.
[33:31.300 --> 33:33.300] Not disperse.
[33:34.300 --> 33:39.300] When you're gonna stop abuse, you're power.
[33:39.300 --> 33:45.300] When you're gonna stop abuse, you're power.
[33:45.300 --> 33:50.300] When you're gonna stop abuse, you're power.
[33:50.300 --> 33:56.300] When you're gonna stop abuse, you're power.
[33:56.300 --> 34:02.300] So please, Mr. Michael, I teach officers not to abuse their power.
[34:03.300 --> 34:04.300] Okay, we are back.
[34:04.300 --> 34:07.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[34:07.300 --> 34:18.300] And I'm having a little bit of difficulty getting to a point I'm trying to present.
[34:18.300 --> 34:22.300] Doing radio, I can't see you.
[34:23.300 --> 34:26.300] For the most part, I can't hear you.
[34:26.300 --> 34:29.300] I'm speaking into a microphone.
[34:29.300 --> 34:33.300] And I have to imagine my listener on the other side.
[34:33.300 --> 34:38.300] And I'm sure Brett will tell you, this is a...
[34:38.300 --> 34:45.300] It takes a mental discipline to remain coherent.
[34:45.300 --> 34:49.300] You know, if I say something stupid and I'm sitting in front of you,
[34:49.300 --> 34:54.300] I can see the expression on your face, even if you're trying to hide it.
[34:54.300 --> 35:00.300] And I can adjust my behavior to get the kind of responses I want to have.
[35:00.300 --> 35:02.300] But I can't see you.
[35:02.300 --> 35:06.300] Or if you accidentally say an acronym and you see it in their face, they didn't quite get it.
[35:06.300 --> 35:12.300] Yeah, yeah, you see their pupils dilate, you know you screwed that one up.
[35:12.300 --> 35:15.300] But we can't see you.
[35:15.300 --> 35:22.300] Brett and I, we have to talk to this microphone and imagine our listeners on the other side.
[35:22.300 --> 35:33.300] Here, I'm trying to imagine a whole different way of thinking about our adversary.
[35:33.300 --> 35:43.300] And I'm very careful not to say our enemy, because these guys, however horrible we may think they are,
[35:43.300 --> 35:47.300] at the end of the day are not our enemies.
[35:47.300 --> 35:51.300] We can never consider them our enemies.
[35:51.300 --> 35:55.300] They are our adversaries.
[35:55.300 --> 36:05.300] These are somewhat adversarial relationships, but they are only adversarial in so much as
[36:05.300 --> 36:14.300] we do not have rapport with one another.
[36:14.300 --> 36:19.300] Give me a second, Brett, I'm having a throat issue.
[36:19.300 --> 36:24.300] Yeah, an adversary is not necessarily an enemy, but it is an adversarial system.
[36:24.300 --> 36:28.300] It's designed to arrive at justice, arrive at the truth.
[36:28.300 --> 36:34.300] And so people are bringing opposing issues, opposing perspectives.
[36:34.300 --> 36:39.300] And it's designed that way, kind of like an opposing thumb.
[36:39.300 --> 36:44.300] You have to have some pressure in order to come to a useful result.
[36:44.300 --> 36:53.300] But that doesn't mean you have to be treating them like they are necessarily doing these lawless things on purpose.
[36:53.300 --> 36:57.300] You did that really great, Brett.
[36:57.300 --> 36:59.300] Thank you.
[36:59.300 --> 37:04.300] I got a spider bite when I was in the rest city about a year or so ago.
[37:04.300 --> 37:06.300] Part of it never went away.
[37:06.300 --> 37:08.300] It affected my throat, never once in a while.
[37:08.300 --> 37:12.300] It feels like someone's sticking a pin through my throat.
[37:12.300 --> 37:14.300] And you can tell when that's happening.
[37:14.300 --> 37:17.300] You hear my voice start to strain.
[37:17.300 --> 37:25.300] Okay, but the point here, the point is we have to start treating them like they're our enemies.
[37:25.300 --> 37:32.300] And what we need to start doing is playing them like cheap fiddles.
[37:32.300 --> 37:35.300] It works better for everybody.
[37:35.300 --> 37:37.300] With a smile.
[37:37.300 --> 37:46.300] Yeah, I talk about the rubber ball theory and about how you can manipulate people with the rubber ball theory, the tools in it.
[37:46.300 --> 37:52.300] But then again, everything is manipulation.
[37:52.300 --> 38:00.300] I manipulate you by the way I dress, by the way I stand, by the way I comport myself, by my tone of voice.
[38:00.300 --> 38:02.300] Everything is a manipulation.
[38:02.300 --> 38:11.300] I'm trying to manipulate you into responding to me in a way that is positive and constructive for me.
[38:11.300 --> 38:18.300] Or in a way that has the appearance of moving me toward my intended outcomes.
[38:18.300 --> 38:20.300] You do the same thing.
[38:20.300 --> 38:23.300] Well, I'll do that all the time.
[38:23.300 --> 38:33.300] So it's time for us to stop just reacting and responding from the seat of our pants.
[38:33.300 --> 38:41.300] If someone says something that tenses our anal sphincter muscle, we don't have to snap back at them.
[38:41.300 --> 38:47.300] If I reach in and push one of your buttons, you don't have to dance for me.
[38:47.300 --> 38:48.300] You can.
[38:48.300 --> 38:54.300] You can huff and puff and read me the right act and let me know how to cow-ate the cabbage.
[38:54.300 --> 39:02.300] And the whole time imagine that I'm being impressed by your verbiage.
[39:02.300 --> 39:04.300] Good luck with that.
[39:04.300 --> 39:15.300] And here dealing with these public officials, do you think you're the only one they have coming down there reading them the right act?
[39:15.300 --> 39:17.300] I get that all the time.
[39:17.300 --> 39:19.300] Yes, not at all.
[39:19.300 --> 39:23.300] There are pros at dealing with that.
[39:23.300 --> 39:29.300] You have so little interaction with these guys, you are out of your league.
[39:29.300 --> 39:31.300] I imagine they get it every day.
[39:31.300 --> 39:36.300] And on the one hand that's a bad thing, but on the other it's a good thing.
[39:36.300 --> 39:45.300] If you understand that they feel as though they deal with this all the time,
[39:45.300 --> 39:55.300] and yet another one of these patriot mythologists, blah, blah, blah, I know how to handle this guy.
[39:55.300 --> 40:09.300] But once you shift your perspective, I go in there and they know for certain I am their adversary.
[40:09.300 --> 40:12.300] I go to the metal detector there in Victoria.
[40:12.300 --> 40:20.300] I put all my stuff in the little box thing and I walk over to this metal detector,
[40:20.300 --> 40:24.300] and the guy is standing on the other side of it with this little wand.
[40:24.300 --> 40:34.300] And I say, if I go through here and make this thing beep, are you going to spank me with that paddle?
[40:34.300 --> 40:37.300] What are they going to do?
[40:37.300 --> 40:43.300] They get tickled, we get talking, laughing, and then I go across the hall into the county clerk's office,
[40:43.300 --> 40:47.300] and I come out in a few minutes and say, hey, guys, I need your help.
[40:47.300 --> 40:49.300] And they say, well, sure, Mr. Kelly, what can I do for you?
[40:49.300 --> 40:53.300] Why did you go in there and arrest the county clerk?
[40:53.300 --> 41:01.300] What? We can arrest the county clerk, sure you can, come on, take your ticket suit off.
[41:01.300 --> 41:05.300] They can't anticipate me.
[41:05.300 --> 41:08.300] I'm not what they expect.
[41:08.300 --> 41:16.300] I don't fit into their mental model of the patriot.
[41:16.300 --> 41:20.300] I'm hoping I can get my listener to understand that.
[41:20.300 --> 41:26.300] I tend to tell people that I preach to the church of the malcontents.
[41:26.300 --> 41:30.300] And I'm trying to adjust that.
[41:30.300 --> 41:38.300] Yeah, we're not unhappy and we don't like the way things are going, but we're not malcontents.
[41:38.300 --> 41:40.300] We want to change things.
[41:40.300 --> 41:47.300] And the only tools we have for the most part is adversarial.
[41:47.300 --> 41:50.300] Oh, God, I have these rights, I have those rights.
[41:50.300 --> 41:52.300] You're supposed to do this and you're supposed to do that.
[41:52.300 --> 41:55.300] Well, that's a natural reaction.
[41:55.300 --> 41:57.300] I'm hoping we can adjust that.
[41:57.300 --> 42:03.300] And that's why I tell everybody, read the code.
[42:03.300 --> 42:11.300] The reason I tell people to read the code is because when you step in front of these guys,
[42:11.300 --> 42:18.300] when you step in front of the courts, the bailiffs, the judges, the prosecutors,
[42:18.300 --> 42:24.300] and you start popping code out at them, now you've got their attention.
[42:24.300 --> 42:30.300] You have just shifted into a whole different perspective.
[42:30.300 --> 42:33.300] You're no longer the patronet.
[42:33.300 --> 42:36.300] They don't know what you are.
[42:36.300 --> 42:42.300] They do know that you're tromping around in their area,
[42:42.300 --> 42:47.300] and you're throwing code at them that they don't know.
[42:47.300 --> 42:51.300] Guys, this is so much fun.
[42:51.300 --> 42:57.300] You burp a code out to them and you can see their eyes go out of focus.
[42:57.300 --> 43:04.300] They do in what new linguistic programming we call transderivational search.
[43:04.300 --> 43:08.300] We organize our experience by context.
[43:08.300 --> 43:12.300] Somebody does something and the inner mind pushes up this mental context.
[43:12.300 --> 43:18.300] And in this mental context are your appropriate responses and reactions.
[43:18.300 --> 43:20.300] And you could just go pick from one of them.
[43:20.300 --> 43:25.300] So this guy comes in and he does something and your inner mind says,
[43:25.300 --> 43:32.300] whoa, hold on, I don't have one for this.
[43:32.300 --> 43:35.300] And that's when their eyes go out of focus.
[43:35.300 --> 43:38.300] Is that kind of like when you see somebody in a context you're not used to seeing them
[43:38.300 --> 43:40.300] and you're, where do I know this person from?
[43:40.300 --> 43:43.300] How am I supposed to interact with them?
[43:43.300 --> 43:45.300] Exactly.
[43:45.300 --> 43:51.300] And we'll talk about that from a hypnotic perspective when we come back.
[43:51.300 --> 43:58.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:58.300 --> 44:00.300] We'll be right back.
[44:00.300 --> 44:04.300] I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[44:04.300 --> 44:07.300] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[44:07.300 --> 44:10.300] I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without logos.
[44:10.300 --> 44:13.300] And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[44:13.300 --> 44:16.300] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite
[44:16.300 --> 44:20.300] and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[44:20.300 --> 44:22.300] How can I help logos?
[44:22.300 --> 44:24.300] Well, I'm glad you asked.
[44:24.300 --> 44:27.300] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[44:27.300 --> 44:31.300] When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.300 --> 44:34.300] Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[44:34.300 --> 44:37.300] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.300 --> 44:43.300] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.300 --> 44:44.300] Do I pay extra?
[44:44.300 --> 44:45.300] No.
[44:45.300 --> 44:47.300] Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:47.300 --> 44:48.300] No.
[44:48.300 --> 44:49.300] Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[44:49.300 --> 44:50.300] No.
[44:50.300 --> 44:51.300] I mean, yes.
[44:51.300 --> 44:54.300] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[44:54.300 --> 44:55.300] This is perfect.
[44:55.300 --> 44:56.300] Thank you so much.
[44:56.300 --> 44:58.300] We are welcome.
[44:58.300 --> 45:00.300] Happy holidays, logos.
[45:00.300 --> 45:03.300] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:03.300 --> 45:07.300] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.300 --> 45:15.300] the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.300 --> 45:19.300] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.300 --> 45:22.300] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.300 --> 45:27.300] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:27.300 --> 45:33.300] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:33.300 --> 45:38.300] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:38.300 --> 45:42.300] about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:42.300 --> 45:49.300] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.300 --> 45:52.300] pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.300 --> 46:20.300] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:20.300 --> 46:26.300] If you could not wait anybody too long, what would your purpose have to be done?
[46:26.300 --> 46:32.300] Such a symptom and a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffle and a key to the peace.
[46:32.300 --> 46:37.300] All they're taking is a misunderstanding and somebody calls the police.
[46:37.300 --> 47:01.300] They're watching the sparks fly.
[47:01.300 --> 47:12.300] Okay, we are back.
[47:12.300 --> 47:15.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[47:15.300 --> 47:17.300] And we're talking about slycology.
[47:17.300 --> 47:24.300] I set up a channel on Telegram and I called it Slycology.
[47:24.300 --> 47:29.300] I've been studying neurolinguistic programming for a very long time.
[47:29.300 --> 47:34.300] And neurolinguistic programming is not some magic thing.
[47:34.300 --> 47:46.300] It's just a study of linguistics, how language and behavior affects the living mind.
[47:46.300 --> 47:54.300] And neurolinguistic programming was developed by Grinder and Bandelier when they modeled a guy
[47:54.300 --> 48:01.300] named Milton Erickson who was a hypnotherapist, the foremost hypnotherapist who ever lived.
[48:01.300 --> 48:05.300] This guy did absolutely magic stuff.
[48:05.300 --> 48:09.300] He could do all this magic stuff but he couldn't tell you what he did.
[48:09.300 --> 48:15.300] And he brought in Grinder and Bandelier to model his behavior.
[48:15.300 --> 48:26.300] And Erickson said that Grinder and Bandelier could explain what he did when he could not.
[48:26.300 --> 48:28.300] He just did these things.
[48:28.300 --> 48:34.300] So neurolinguistic programming and all this was designed around hypnosis.
[48:34.300 --> 48:43.300] But as you study psychology and human behavior, it becomes clear that this term hypnosis,
[48:43.300 --> 48:49.300] it's not a very good term.
[48:49.300 --> 48:54.300] People hear the term hypnosis and they think about these stage acts
[48:54.300 --> 48:58.300] where somebody goes into this trance and they zone out.
[48:58.300 --> 49:01.300] That is not the case.
[49:01.300 --> 49:13.300] The theatrical hypnotist, he only picks the worst subjects.
[49:13.300 --> 49:19.300] The subjects that are just totally submissive to do his demonstrations with.
[49:19.300 --> 49:28.300] The best hypnotic subjects are the ones that do hypnosis on the fly.
[49:28.300 --> 49:34.300] And in fact, everybody does hypnosis on the fly.
[49:34.300 --> 49:38.300] Everything is hypnosis.
[49:38.300 --> 49:43.300] Hypnosis merely means focus of attention.
[49:43.300 --> 49:50.300] If someone has hypnotized you, you realize nobody ever takes control of you.
[49:50.300 --> 50:01.300] Hypnosis is just about helping someone focus their mind and eliminate all their distractions.
[50:01.300 --> 50:10.300] We do that to a greater or lesser amount in all of our communications.
[50:10.300 --> 50:18.300] Who here hasn't read a book to where they start reading and then an hour later they wake up?
[50:18.300 --> 50:24.300] They fall into the prose.
[50:24.300 --> 50:33.300] And that's where the writer has been very careful never to interrupt your internal expectations.
[50:33.300 --> 50:37.300] He has drawn you into a hypnotic trance.
[50:37.300 --> 50:41.300] Reading is the most hypnotic thing I ever do.
[50:41.300 --> 50:50.300] The second most hypnotic thing I ever do is listen to human beings speak.
[50:50.300 --> 50:53.300] You say a couple of words.
[50:53.300 --> 51:02.300] My inner mind listens to those words and looks inside for a mental context in which to put those words.
[51:02.300 --> 51:09.300] And then it delivers up to me a mental context such that I can understand your verbiage.
[51:09.300 --> 51:15.300] This is an interaction between the conscious aspect and the inner mind that goes on all the time.
[51:15.300 --> 51:17.300] I don't like subconscious.
[51:17.300 --> 51:19.300] I don't believe that's a correct term.
[51:19.300 --> 51:22.300] We have a couple of parts to the mind.
[51:22.300 --> 51:30.300] We have a conscious aspect that can pay attention to seven plus or minus two pieces of information at one time.
[51:30.300 --> 51:32.300] And that is it.
[51:32.300 --> 51:38.300] All of you have probably heard me tell a story about a therapeutic metaphor I was doing
[51:38.300 --> 51:44.300] where I told a woman that I have this sister and I reached up with my left hand and I point it in the air.
[51:44.300 --> 51:45.300] She's older than me.
[51:45.300 --> 51:48.300] I point it in the air with my right hand.
[51:48.300 --> 51:49.300] She lives in Chicago.
[51:49.300 --> 51:50.300] I point it in the air.
[51:50.300 --> 51:53.300] What I'm doing is analog marking.
[51:53.300 --> 51:57.300] I make a statement and reach up and point with my finger.
[51:57.300 --> 52:04.300] And the listener and the one sitting across from me sees that and that indicates this is important.
[52:04.300 --> 52:06.300] So they mark it in the mind.
[52:06.300 --> 52:08.300] And then they say something else and they mark that in the mind.
[52:08.300 --> 52:09.300] This is all nonsense.
[52:09.300 --> 52:11.300] It doesn't mean anything, do anything.
[52:11.300 --> 52:17.300] But it gets the conscious mind all loaded up with this stuff that don't make any difference.
[52:17.300 --> 52:29.300] And then when I get to the good part, I've got the conscious mind sitting there waiting for all of these analog marks to come back and have some importance.
[52:29.300 --> 52:32.300] And that causes them to miss what I'm actually doing.
[52:32.300 --> 52:36.300] Everybody does this all the time, whether they realize it or not.
[52:36.300 --> 52:40.300] We talk to someone else and we want them to understand what we're saying.
[52:40.300 --> 52:44.300] So we give them cues as to the context of our speech.
[52:44.300 --> 52:50.300] And they go inside and pull out a mental context that fits our speech patterns.
[52:50.300 --> 52:55.300] And then they compare what we're saying to that mental context.
[52:55.300 --> 53:02.300] What happens if you shift up those mental contexts?
[53:02.300 --> 53:06.300] It's called pattern interruption.
[53:06.300 --> 53:09.300] A lot of you have read my rubber ball theory.
[53:09.300 --> 53:17.300] The rubber ball theory is about how to interrupt a mental context.
[53:17.300 --> 53:26.300] You say some things and get someone to go inside and pull out a mental context that fits what you're talking about.
[53:26.300 --> 53:32.300] Anger, frustration, compassion, whatever the context is.
[53:32.300 --> 53:36.300] And then you do something that violates that context.
[53:36.300 --> 53:43.300] Then your mind says, whoa, wait a minute, hold on, that doesn't fit.
[53:43.300 --> 53:47.300] That's called hypnosis.
[53:47.300 --> 53:59.300] I've just kicked you out of mental flow and forced your inner mind to go inside and try to find a way to make sense of what I'm talking about.
[53:59.300 --> 54:07.300] And the reason this is appropriate to what we're talking about here is when you step in front of these public officials,
[54:07.300 --> 54:11.300] they have this mental context of how to deal with the public.
[54:11.300 --> 54:15.300] They get the person who's very submissive and will do whatever they say.
[54:15.300 --> 54:20.300] They get the person who is analytical and will analyze everything they say.
[54:20.300 --> 54:26.300] They get to the person who is what the American Indians call the contrary.
[54:26.300 --> 54:31.300] No matter what you say, they're going to object to it.
[54:31.300 --> 54:37.300] Virginia Satere had four basic categories of human behavior.
[54:37.300 --> 54:43.300] And she could fit everybody into one of these categories.
[54:43.300 --> 54:50.300] Well, if someone comes in and they're what Virginia Satere would call a distractor,
[54:50.300 --> 54:59.300] no matter what you say, they will say something that doesn't fit, that's inappropriate.
[54:59.300 --> 55:04.300] Who hasn't been around the person who just seems stutter-brained?
[55:04.300 --> 55:09.300] You're talking about one subject and they jump to another one.
[55:09.300 --> 55:11.300] And you think they're just scatterbrained.
[55:11.300 --> 55:14.300] No, no, they're not just scatterbrained.
[55:14.300 --> 55:18.300] They don't feel comfortable with the subject that you're talking about,
[55:18.300 --> 55:24.300] so they use a strategy to keep you disrupted.
[55:24.300 --> 55:28.300] Everything is manipulation.
[55:28.300 --> 55:39.300] When you walk in front of a public official, they have a set of concepts that they will put you into.
[55:39.300 --> 55:47.300] If you are to be effective, you need to understand that they have a set of concepts they're going to put you into
[55:47.300 --> 55:52.300] and understand how to interrupt those.
[55:52.300 --> 56:00.300] I go in, talk to the bailiffs, joke with them, and they think, God, this is a fun guy.
[56:00.300 --> 56:01.300] He's not serious.
[56:01.300 --> 56:03.300] He's just playing around.
[56:03.300 --> 56:04.300] No problem.
[56:04.300 --> 56:07.300] All their defenses are down.
[56:07.300 --> 56:11.300] And then I walk out of their county clerk's office.
[56:11.300 --> 56:13.300] Hey, guys, how's it going?
[56:13.300 --> 56:18.300] And I fit right into their internal expectations.
[56:18.300 --> 56:20.300] And they say, what can I do for you, Mr. Calhoun?
[56:20.300 --> 56:23.300] I go in there and arrest the clerk.
[56:23.300 --> 56:25.300] Oops.
[56:25.300 --> 56:29.300] I didn't see that one coming.
[56:29.300 --> 56:41.300] If we are to be effective, the first thing we have to do is get outside our own internal expectations.
[56:41.300 --> 56:52.300] If you expect the bailiff to be a jackbooted thug, you will react and respond to him as if he is a jackbooted thug,
[56:52.300 --> 57:01.300] and you will extract that behavior from him and then blame him for it.
[57:01.300 --> 57:13.300] If you expect the bailiff to be just an ordinary guy like the guy next door, he will hear it in the tone of your voice.
[57:13.300 --> 57:25.300] He will see it in your body language, and it will extract from him the mental context of the guy next door.
[57:25.300 --> 57:28.300] He doesn't have to know you're doing that on purpose.
[57:28.300 --> 57:40.300] But if we are to take control of our officials, if we are to become an influence, we need to become more than we are.
[57:40.300 --> 57:45.300] We need to look more deeply inside ourselves.
[57:45.300 --> 57:52.300] If you haven't gotten my rubber ball theory and read it, do so.
[57:52.300 --> 58:00.300] It is the most powerful tool you'll ever have for being effective before these public officials.
[58:00.300 --> 58:10.300] Once you've read that, then you listen to the stories I tell, you will know precisely what I'm doing.
[58:10.300 --> 58:19.300] And it will be clear what I'm doing is absolutely nowhere near random, that underneath there's a pattern.
[58:19.300 --> 58:24.300] And the pattern has proven over the last 30 years to be extremely effective.
[58:24.300 --> 58:31.300] And it is my purpose to get everyone listening to be as effective as I am.
[58:31.300 --> 58:36.300] When we come back, we'll go to our callers, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio.
[58:36.300 --> 58:38.300] And I hope all this makes sense.
[58:38.300 --> 58:46.300] If it didn't, send me an email and tell me I'm full of crapola so I can improve my presentation.
[58:46.300 --> 58:50.300] We'll be right back.
[59:16.300 --> 59:19.300] We'll be right back.
[59:47.300 --> 59:50.300] That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.300 --> 59:59.300] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[59:59.300 --> 01:00:05.300] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.300 --> 01:00:08.300] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:08.300 --> 01:00:10.300] Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:10.300 --> 01:00:15.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your
[01:00:15.300 --> 01:00:17.300] constitutional rights.
[01:00:46.300 --> 01:00:48.300] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:48.300 --> 01:00:51.300] They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:51.300 --> 01:00:54.300] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:54.300 --> 01:00:59.300] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was
[01:00:59.300 --> 01:01:00.300] designed to prevent.
[01:01:00.300 --> 01:01:05.300] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days
[01:01:05.300 --> 01:01:06.300] of our founding fathers.
[01:01:06.300 --> 01:01:08.300] Third party, Third Amendment?
[01:01:08.300 --> 01:01:09.300] Get it?
[01:01:09.300 --> 01:01:13.300] So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off
[01:01:13.300 --> 01:01:16.300] their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment.
[01:01:16.300 --> 01:01:18.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:18.300 --> 01:01:21.300] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.300 --> 01:01:35.300] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.300 --> 01:01:38.300] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:38.300 --> 01:01:40.300] Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.300 --> 01:01:44.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:01:44.300 --> 01:01:46.300] one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:46.300 --> 01:01:48.300] Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:48.300 --> 01:01:52.300] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.300 --> 01:01:57.300] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.300 --> 01:01:58.300] So protect your rights.
[01:01:58.300 --> 01:02:02.300] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.300 --> 01:02:04.300] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:02:04.300 --> 01:02:08.300] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:08.300 --> 01:02:12.300] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.300 --> 01:02:16.300] Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.300 --> 01:02:20.300] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass,
[01:02:20.300 --> 01:02:22.300] or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.300 --> 01:02:26.300] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom
[01:02:26.300 --> 01:02:28.300] from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:02:28.300 --> 01:02:31.300] Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[01:02:31.300 --> 01:02:34.300] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights
[01:02:34.300 --> 01:02:35.300] in the name of security.
[01:02:35.300 --> 01:02:40.300] Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:40.300 --> 01:02:44.300] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause,
[01:02:44.300 --> 01:02:47.300] I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:47.300 --> 01:02:50.300] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:02:50.300 --> 01:02:54.300] and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:54.300 --> 01:02:55.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:55.300 --> 01:03:05.300] For more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:05.300 --> 01:03:27.300] Thank you very much.
[01:03:35.300 --> 01:03:45.300] Okay.
[01:03:45.300 --> 01:03:46.300] We are back.
[01:03:46.300 --> 01:03:55.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue of Our Radio on this, the 18th day of August, 2022.
[01:03:55.300 --> 01:04:02.300] And we have a first-time caller, and he is a Canuck.
[01:04:02.300 --> 01:04:05.300] Hello, Joe.
[01:04:05.300 --> 01:04:07.300] How are you?
[01:04:07.300 --> 01:04:09.300] I am good.
[01:04:09.300 --> 01:04:12.300] This is Joe from Canada.
[01:04:12.300 --> 01:04:14.300] That's right.
[01:04:14.300 --> 01:04:17.300] What do you have for us today?
[01:04:17.300 --> 01:04:23.300] Well, in 2018, I got some criminal charges.
[01:04:23.300 --> 01:04:28.300] And after about six months after I got charged, I started studying the law.
[01:04:28.300 --> 01:04:38.300] And I realized the fraud within the legal system, part of what you guys call the patriotic mythology.
[01:04:38.300 --> 01:04:43.300] And I fired my lawyer, and I started representing myself.
[01:04:43.300 --> 01:04:52.300] When I went to court for the first time in 2019, I challenged the subject matter jurisdiction in person in court.
[01:04:52.300 --> 01:05:02.300] The judge told me that it didn't matter that I could challenge it at trial.
[01:05:02.300 --> 01:05:06.300] And they proceeded on with the matter.
[01:05:06.300 --> 01:05:10.300] Whoa! Whoa! Hold on.
[01:05:10.300 --> 01:05:12.300] I know, right?
[01:05:12.300 --> 01:05:19.300] Okay. You got the fact that when I say, whoa, hold on, there's a big problem there.
[01:05:19.300 --> 01:05:22.300] Yeah.
[01:05:22.300 --> 01:05:25.300] Did the judge rule on your...
[01:05:25.300 --> 01:05:26.300] I'm sorry.
[01:05:26.300 --> 01:05:27.300] I interrupted you.
[01:05:27.300 --> 01:05:32.300] Go ahead and finish, and I'll go back to this.
[01:05:32.300 --> 01:05:41.300] Well, then he tried to book another court date, and I told him that he didn't have the jurisdiction to book the court date
[01:05:41.300 --> 01:05:47.300] because they never provided me with the jurisdiction.
[01:05:47.300 --> 01:05:56.300] The next court date that I had, again, this was the senior regional manager judge of the area,
[01:05:56.300 --> 01:06:05.300] and I asked him to provide the jurisdiction, and I asked for the jurisdiction in writing from the Crown.
[01:06:05.300 --> 01:06:10.300] And all they said is, don't worry, we have the jurisdiction.
[01:06:10.300 --> 01:06:13.300] That was nice of him.
[01:06:13.300 --> 01:06:16.300] Just don't worry.
[01:06:16.300 --> 01:06:19.300] Exactly. Just trust me, we have jurisdiction.
[01:06:19.300 --> 01:06:24.300] Five weeks after I challenged the jurisdiction, the Crown...
[01:06:24.300 --> 01:06:27.300] Okay. Wait, wait. Let me take a step back.
[01:06:27.300 --> 01:06:28.300] Yeah.
[01:06:28.300 --> 01:06:33.300] On what basis did you challenge subject matter jurisdiction?
[01:06:33.300 --> 01:06:37.300] I just asked, what is the subject matter jurisdiction?
[01:06:37.300 --> 01:06:42.300] Okay. That is not a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:06:42.300 --> 01:06:43.300] Okay.
[01:06:43.300 --> 01:06:52.300] You need to state specifically why the court does not have jurisdiction.
[01:06:52.300 --> 01:07:02.300] The courts, and here there will be some slight differences between Canada and the United States.
[01:07:02.300 --> 01:07:11.300] But U.S. law was originally adopted from English law.
[01:07:11.300 --> 01:07:18.300] And subsequently we made some changes, but basically they are the same.
[01:07:18.300 --> 01:07:25.300] And subject matter jurisdiction is so generic that it will be essentially the same.
[01:07:25.300 --> 01:07:28.300] But in order to...
[01:07:28.300 --> 01:07:34.300] When you go into court, subject matter jurisdiction is presumed until challenged.
[01:07:34.300 --> 01:07:44.300] And asking the court to show jurisdiction is not a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:07:44.300 --> 01:07:54.300] You must state a reason as to why you believe the court does not have jurisdiction.
[01:07:54.300 --> 01:08:00.300] And then ask the court to prove up their jurisdiction.
[01:08:00.300 --> 01:08:02.300] Does that make sense?
[01:08:02.300 --> 01:08:06.300] Yeah. I did ask because I did state that I...
[01:08:06.300 --> 01:08:12.300] Because here, well, I guess it's kind of like the U.S. where they use the person,
[01:08:12.300 --> 01:08:20.300] which comes to, again, I think that's what you guys call the patriotic mythology.
[01:08:20.300 --> 01:08:26.300] Kind of, but not necessarily.
[01:08:26.300 --> 01:08:28.300] We don't hate these guys.
[01:08:28.300 --> 01:08:32.300] They just make unsupported presuppositions.
[01:08:32.300 --> 01:08:36.300] So I'm sorry.
[01:08:36.300 --> 01:08:37.300] Go ahead.
[01:08:37.300 --> 01:08:40.300] I need to hear more before I know how to speak.
[01:08:40.300 --> 01:08:42.300] Well, and this is what I said.
[01:08:42.300 --> 01:08:44.300] Like I said, I'm not a person.
[01:08:44.300 --> 01:08:49.300] I'm not a person in your legal system.
[01:08:49.300 --> 01:08:53.300] Like those announcements don't apply to me.
[01:08:53.300 --> 01:08:57.300] How did you get there?
[01:08:57.300 --> 01:09:01.300] Well, just with the definition of the word person, for one.
[01:09:01.300 --> 01:09:06.300] And what definition are you going by?
[01:09:06.300 --> 01:09:14.300] In the Interpretation Act of Canada, the definition of the word person includes a corporation.
[01:09:14.300 --> 01:09:16.300] And at the beginning of the criminal code...
[01:09:16.300 --> 01:09:17.300] Wait, wait, wait.
[01:09:17.300 --> 01:09:23.300] Does it also include a living, breathing human being?
[01:09:23.300 --> 01:09:28.300] Well, in the Black's Law Dictionary, it says that includes is to shut in.
[01:09:28.300 --> 01:09:30.300] So it's to confine.
[01:09:30.300 --> 01:09:32.300] So it only means what it's about to say.
[01:09:32.300 --> 01:09:33.300] Wait, wait, wait.
[01:09:33.300 --> 01:09:35.300] No, no, no.
[01:09:35.300 --> 01:09:37.300] Whoa, I have a problem with that.
[01:09:37.300 --> 01:09:41.300] Include does not confine.
[01:09:41.300 --> 01:09:46.300] Include incorporates.
[01:09:46.300 --> 01:10:00.300] The definition of person, every definition I have seen, includes a living, breathing human being or a legal fiction.
[01:10:00.300 --> 01:10:13.300] And what the Patriot Movement has done is said that because it includes a legal fiction, it somehow excludes a living, breathing human being.
[01:10:13.300 --> 01:10:17.300] And I've never found any standing for that.
[01:10:17.300 --> 01:10:24.300] You are a person, and what they've said is that we have a corporation here.
[01:10:24.300 --> 01:10:46.300] And for the purposes of the rights provided, a corporation is considered a person for the singular purpose of providing them the same kinds, the corporation, the same kinds of legal protection that an individual person has.
[01:10:46.300 --> 01:10:55.300] In that you can't embezzle from a person and you can't embezzle from a corporation.
[01:10:55.300 --> 01:10:58.300] You can't steal from a corporation.
[01:10:58.300 --> 01:11:01.300] You can't defame a corporation.
[01:11:01.300 --> 01:11:11.300] In their capacity as a corporation, they have the same rights that a person does.
[01:11:11.300 --> 01:11:12.300] Okay.
[01:11:12.300 --> 01:11:25.300] And the Patriot community has taken that and distorted it into something that is sometimes really hard to figure out.
[01:11:25.300 --> 01:11:32.300] So you're claiming that you are a, if not a person, what?
[01:11:32.300 --> 01:11:34.300] Just a human being.
[01:11:34.300 --> 01:11:43.300] Well, is a human being included in the definition of person?
[01:11:43.300 --> 01:11:44.300] Okay.
[01:11:44.300 --> 01:11:47.300] Well, this is where, again, this is where I found the Black's law.
[01:11:47.300 --> 01:11:57.300] It states in statute, when it comes to statute terms, and that's when it starts basically stating off legal fictions.
[01:11:57.300 --> 01:12:07.300] And wasn't it you that said if you are naming off legal fictions, then it kind of, I can't remember how you said it.
[01:12:07.300 --> 01:12:08.300] Okay.
[01:12:08.300 --> 01:12:09.300] Hold on.
[01:12:09.300 --> 01:12:10.300] Let's not lose our place.
[01:12:10.300 --> 01:12:12.300] Legal fiction.
[01:12:12.300 --> 01:12:16.300] What does a legal fiction mean?
[01:12:16.300 --> 01:12:20.300] The legal fiction, again, it would come back to a corporation.
[01:12:20.300 --> 01:12:27.300] Or it could be a corporation or it could be a private membership association.
[01:12:27.300 --> 01:12:29.300] It could be a...
[01:12:29.300 --> 01:12:31.300] A trust.
[01:12:31.300 --> 01:12:38.300] A trust, a, what do you call it, a limited liability.
[01:12:38.300 --> 01:12:41.300] Anything that exists in the paper.
[01:12:41.300 --> 01:12:42.300] Yeah.
[01:12:42.300 --> 01:12:43.300] Right.
[01:12:43.300 --> 01:12:45.300] And doesn't an individual be included in that?
[01:12:45.300 --> 01:12:46.300] Oh, absolutely.
[01:12:46.300 --> 01:12:49.300] Individual is primary.
[01:12:49.300 --> 01:13:00.300] All of these others are secondary to individual, but they have, what they're saying is, is these legal entities, legal fictions,
[01:13:00.300 --> 01:13:05.300] they're legal fictions because you can't hold them in your hand.
[01:13:05.300 --> 01:13:08.300] You can't touch them, feel them.
[01:13:08.300 --> 01:13:14.300] There are a legal concept and a trust.
[01:13:14.300 --> 01:13:16.300] You can't hold a trust in your hand.
[01:13:16.300 --> 01:13:22.300] You can look at some papers that create the trust, but you can't hold it in your hand.
[01:13:22.300 --> 01:13:24.300] The trust is a legal fiction.
[01:13:24.300 --> 01:13:26.300] The corporation is a legal fiction.
[01:13:26.300 --> 01:13:30.300] The private company is a legal fiction.
[01:13:30.300 --> 01:13:33.300] But all of these have certain rights.
[01:13:33.300 --> 01:13:42.300] If we are to have a stable legal system, companies can't be subject to any kind of intrusion.
[01:13:42.300 --> 01:13:46.300] They have to have some protection so they can function effectively.
[01:13:46.300 --> 01:13:50.300] And that's what this definition goes to.
[01:13:50.300 --> 01:14:04.300] It imports rights granted to the sovereign and singular individual to legal fictions, to companies that individuals have created.
[01:14:04.300 --> 01:14:08.300] Nothing in law is created out of thin air.
[01:14:08.300 --> 01:14:13.300] All things in law are created out of sovereign citizens.
[01:14:13.300 --> 01:14:21.300] I hate that they've distorted the term sovereign citizens, but citizens in republics or whatever country it is,
[01:14:21.300 --> 01:14:25.300] they got together and they created this entity.
[01:14:25.300 --> 01:14:27.300] Yeah, the entity is a legal fiction.
[01:14:27.300 --> 01:14:35.300] I mean, it doesn't exist in a real space where you can touch it, but it exists in the minds of men.
[01:14:35.300 --> 01:14:47.300] And so that companies can be protected by law, they become the legal fiction and they are designated a person for that purpose.
[01:14:47.300 --> 01:14:51.300] I hope that makes sense.
[01:14:51.300 --> 01:14:53.300] Yes, I get that.
[01:14:53.300 --> 01:15:00.300] But at the same time, I thought when there was a definition that would say individual, it would say the trust,
[01:15:00.300 --> 01:15:07.300] an incorporation, I thought that all things the same fall under that definition,
[01:15:07.300 --> 01:15:13.300] and that's where it would not include a man because a man is a real thing.
[01:15:13.300 --> 01:15:16.300] No.
[01:15:16.300 --> 01:15:20.300] That's some of the legal fiction that was promoted out there.
[01:15:20.300 --> 01:15:27.300] Essentially, a legal fiction has the same standing under law as a man,
[01:15:27.300 --> 01:15:40.300] unless in a particular statutory context, the definition excludes legal fictions.
[01:15:40.300 --> 01:15:51.300] The problem I have with the legal mythology crowd is they take a definition in one context or in one statutory structure.
[01:15:51.300 --> 01:15:52.300] Right.
[01:15:52.300 --> 01:15:54.300] That's where it's a problem.
[01:15:54.300 --> 01:15:59.300] They try to superimpose it on another statutory structure.
[01:15:59.300 --> 01:16:04.300] These definitions only have relevance in context,
[01:16:04.300 --> 01:16:11.300] and we have to exercise extreme mental discipline to keep from confusing ourselves.
[01:16:11.300 --> 01:16:13.300] Yes, because it could be either way.
[01:16:13.300 --> 01:16:16.300] You can have it be exclusive or inclusive,
[01:16:16.300 --> 01:16:26.300] and there's a maxim of law that people like to try to impose on everything instead of the expression of one thing is to exclude another,
[01:16:26.300 --> 01:16:32.300] and they try to impose that on everything without any consideration for context.
[01:16:32.300 --> 01:16:40.300] So you have to pay attention to that context to see is this one of the things where it's being construed in this way or that way?
[01:16:40.300 --> 01:16:58.300] One of the most blatant examples of this is for years we had people taking a definition out of the IRS code and applying it to all other codes.
[01:16:58.300 --> 01:17:12.300] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk,
[01:17:12.300 --> 01:17:17.300] where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[01:17:17.300 --> 01:17:24.300] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth.
[01:17:24.300 --> 01:17:31.300] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[01:17:31.300 --> 01:17:38.300] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[01:17:38.300 --> 01:17:43.300] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:43.300 --> 01:17:49.300] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:17:49.300 --> 01:18:00.300] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.300 --> 01:18:05.300] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.300 --> 01:18:09.300] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:18:09.300 --> 01:18:14.300] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:18:14.300 --> 01:18:20.300] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:18:20.300 --> 01:18:26.300] what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:18:26.300 --> 01:18:33.300] how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:33.300 --> 01:18:38.300] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:38.300 --> 01:18:44.300] Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com
[01:18:44.300 --> 01:18:49.300] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.300 --> 01:19:00.300] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:00.300 --> 01:19:10.300] This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.300 --> 01:19:43.300] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Joe in Canada.
[01:19:43.300 --> 01:19:49.300] And Joe, I know we didn't let you get to where you were trying to go.
[01:19:49.300 --> 01:19:56.300] And Brett and I talked about that over the break, and there was a reason we didn't do that.
[01:19:56.300 --> 01:20:04.300] I've dealt with this patriot mythology stuff for about 30 years now, and it is frustrating.
[01:20:04.300 --> 01:20:09.300] Someone once sent me to a guy named Gene Keating's website.
[01:20:09.300 --> 01:20:14.300] I went to his website, and he said, this is so.
[01:20:14.300 --> 01:20:20.300] And because this is so, this other thing is so, and this other thing is so, and this other thing is so,
[01:20:20.300 --> 01:20:27.300] halfway down the page, I am six suppositions in.
[01:20:27.300 --> 01:20:34.300] And he's saying, because all of this is so, this other main deal I'm proposing here is true.
[01:20:34.300 --> 01:20:41.300] I said, wait a minute, guy. I didn't think the first one was correct.
[01:20:41.300 --> 01:20:46.300] You made this supposition, and you didn't support it. You just said this thing was so.
[01:20:46.300 --> 01:20:52.300] And then based on that being so, you went to this other thing and said, if that's so, then this is so.
[01:20:52.300 --> 01:21:01.300] And I said, wait a minute, that one's not so either. I'm six in on the first page.
[01:21:01.300 --> 01:21:07.300] That's the problem I get with the patriot group, mythology group.
[01:21:07.300 --> 01:21:16.300] You have to substantiate each one. You started with person.
[01:21:16.300 --> 01:21:29.300] If your definition of person is adulterated, Joe, how can we go to something else?
[01:21:29.300 --> 01:21:32.300] I admit, I used you.
[01:21:32.300 --> 01:21:37.300] That's okay. But the thing is that there's more to it than that. Like I did serve in documents.
[01:21:37.300 --> 01:21:40.300] I was asking for certain information and stuff.
[01:21:40.300 --> 01:21:47.300] But one thing that I guess a lot of people do is we start studying the law,
[01:21:47.300 --> 01:21:53.300] and we realize that there is something wrong. And for me, I just jumped into it.
[01:21:53.300 --> 01:21:58.300] I just fired my lawyer, and I went head on against these guys.
[01:21:58.300 --> 01:22:03.300] I just saw that they were crooks.
[01:22:03.300 --> 01:22:06.300] Okay. Let me make a comment here.
[01:22:06.300 --> 01:22:16.300] You are the kind of people that I do this show to find.
[01:22:16.300 --> 01:22:21.300] Right now, I think you're going down the wrong road, but I don't care about that.
[01:22:21.300 --> 01:22:26.300] You're going down a road, and that's what matters.
[01:22:26.300 --> 01:22:29.300] I'm not down that road anymore.
[01:22:29.300 --> 01:22:30.300] Good.
[01:22:30.300 --> 01:22:34.300] You've got to hear the rest of the story to understand.
[01:22:34.300 --> 01:22:37.300] Okay. That's what I meant. We used you.
[01:22:37.300 --> 01:22:47.300] We have so many people out here preaching this patriot mythology that you presented the core issue.
[01:22:47.300 --> 01:22:55.300] And I wanted to address that for all of the people that are listening to us who come across all these patriot mythologists.
[01:22:55.300 --> 01:23:04.300] The whole point was pay real close attention to all the suppositions that come before you.
[01:23:04.300 --> 01:23:09.300] I made my point. I'm going to shut up now, Joe.
[01:23:09.300 --> 01:23:13.300] Let's go back to what you were trying to tell us.
[01:23:13.300 --> 01:23:22.300] Okay. So because I had served the crown asking certain questions,
[01:23:22.300 --> 01:23:25.300] I don't even have those documents in front of me right now,
[01:23:25.300 --> 01:23:34.300] but I kind of divulged a lot of the information that I knew of what was going on with this bar association.
[01:23:34.300 --> 01:23:43.300] So when I challenged the jurisdiction in person, the crown called one of the officers and had them do an investigation of my case,
[01:23:43.300 --> 01:23:48.300] and they came because in the summer I usually live on my 32-foot boat that I live on at the marina.
[01:23:48.300 --> 01:23:58.300] So over a year after I was charged, they came and stole my boat claiming that I could have been purchased with proceeds of crime.
[01:23:58.300 --> 01:24:06.300] But really what they were doing is they were trying to scare me into getting a lawyer because I just absolutely refused to get a lawyer.
[01:24:06.300 --> 01:24:14.300] So I continued to fight on my own just with, again, with what I was learning as I was studying.
[01:24:14.300 --> 01:24:25.300] I served the crown a document, an eight-page document exposing all the frauds that they were committing with a bunch of pages with exhibits.
[01:24:25.300 --> 01:24:34.300] The crown filed a complaint against me, fabricated a story, and I went to jail for 26 months.
[01:24:34.300 --> 01:24:40.300] I don't even have a criminal record. They absolutely refused to release me.
[01:24:40.300 --> 01:24:46.300] I went for bail. I had seven sureties, almost three-quarters of a million dollars worth of collateral.
[01:24:46.300 --> 01:24:55.300] They just called my sureties liars and just fabricated stories the whole time.
[01:24:55.300 --> 01:25:00.300] And in that time, I believe I went to court at least, at least 120 times.
[01:25:00.300 --> 01:25:03.300] So at the end, you know, well, I shouldn't even say at the end.
[01:25:03.300 --> 01:25:12.300] Partly through the beginning, you just get so comfortable being in the courtroom after a while that you just try anything and everything.
[01:25:12.300 --> 01:25:19.300] I spent my 26 months just studying, ordering books, reading, and studying.
[01:25:19.300 --> 01:25:28.300] Finally, and I would ask almost every single time that I would go to court, I would ask the judge, are you acting under your public oath today?
[01:25:28.300 --> 01:25:31.300] They won't answer. I would ask.
[01:25:31.300 --> 01:25:34.300] Wait, wait, say that again. You would ask what?
[01:25:34.300 --> 01:25:40.300] Are they acting under their public oath? And they wouldn't answer.
[01:25:40.300 --> 01:25:47.300] I would ask what law is in operation in this courtroom right now. They won't answer.
[01:25:47.300 --> 01:25:51.300] Okay. This brings me to some questions.
[01:25:51.300 --> 01:26:07.300] And it's something I'm not familiar with in Canada. What is the nature of your ability to appeal decisions of the Crown in Canada?
[01:26:07.300 --> 01:26:10.300] Okay. Let me explain why I ask it that way.
[01:26:10.300 --> 01:26:20.300] In Texas, in the United States, if we get a ruling that we think is inappropriate, we can do a couple of things.
[01:26:20.300 --> 01:26:26.300] We can file up for a petition for writ of mandamus.
[01:26:26.300 --> 01:26:34.300] We can ask the court, the appellate court, if we think that the trial court has ruled improperly,
[01:26:34.300 --> 01:26:41.300] we can ask the appellate court for a mandate ordering the court to act properly.
[01:26:41.300 --> 01:26:47.300] Or we can file a petition for writ of habeas corpus if our liberty is at stake.
[01:26:47.300 --> 01:26:54.300] What do you have in Canada to protect you from bad rulings by the trial court?
[01:26:54.300 --> 01:26:57.300] Yeah. We have the mandamus and we have the writ of habeas corpus.
[01:26:57.300 --> 01:27:04.300] And I claimed habeas corpus multiple times. I did it in writing, and they just ignored it.
[01:27:04.300 --> 01:27:15.300] Okay. Okay, okay, okay. What is the remedy for when the courts ignore a habeas corpus?
[01:27:15.300 --> 01:27:23.300] In our habeas corpus act, it states that if there's a disobedience of the writ and we file a complaint,
[01:27:23.300 --> 01:27:30.300] there is supposed to be issued a warrant for the arrest of the person who disobeyed the writ.
[01:27:30.300 --> 01:27:33.300] Did you do that?
[01:27:33.300 --> 01:27:40.300] Yes. And they came back and said they don't see as though the judge did anything wrong.
[01:27:40.300 --> 01:27:55.300] Okay. Step back. When you file the complaint, what does the code say that the individual
[01:27:55.300 --> 01:28:00.300] or entity with whom you filed the complaint must do?
[01:28:00.300 --> 01:28:04.300] Let me tell you why I asked that question that way.
[01:28:04.300 --> 01:28:16.300] Yeah, I'm in Texas, and I filed a complaint. And in Texas, the code says when a complaint is forwarded
[01:28:16.300 --> 01:28:29.300] to a magistrate, that is in compliance with 15.05, and 15.05 says these are the prerequisites of a complaint.
[01:28:29.300 --> 01:28:46.300] If the complaint provides all the requisites of the complaint, it says the magistrate shall issue a warrant forthwith.
[01:28:46.300 --> 01:28:55.300] What does the code say in Canada when a citizen files a criminal complaint?
[01:28:55.300 --> 01:29:05.300] Who do you file the complaint with, and what is that person commanded to do when they receive the complaint?
[01:29:05.300 --> 01:29:11.300] We file our criminal complaint with the Justice of the Peace, and I've tried to find exactly what you're saying,
[01:29:11.300 --> 01:29:16.300] and I cannot find it in the rules. I look at the Justice of the Peace Act.
[01:29:16.300 --> 01:29:26.300] Okay, hold on. Do you have a criminal procedure code? Texas is called a code of criminal procedure.
[01:29:26.300 --> 01:29:36.300] There has to be some. You do have a code of criminal procedure, and you have a civil code.
[01:29:36.300 --> 01:29:47.300] And a code of criminal procedure is generally a subset of criminal code. Okay. You work them both together.
[01:29:47.300 --> 01:29:56.300] I'm not sure. I'm not sure not what. Okay, hang on. We'll be, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we love radio.
[01:29:56.300 --> 01:30:06.300] This is fun. This is what I like to do. We'll be right back.
[01:30:06.300 --> 01:30:09.300] Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:30:09.300 --> 01:30:16.300] But now researchers say we can add stress to the list. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back with details in a moment.
[01:30:16.300 --> 01:30:22.300] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.300 --> 01:30:27.300] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.300 --> 01:30:32.300] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.300 --> 01:30:38.300] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:30:38.300 --> 01:30:45.300] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:45.300 --> 01:30:49.300] Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:49.300 --> 01:30:53.300] No, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart, but think again.
[01:30:53.300 --> 01:30:56.300] All that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:30:56.300 --> 01:31:00.300] A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:31:00.300 --> 01:31:04.300] which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:04.300 --> 01:31:10.300] Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:10.300 --> 01:31:16.300] That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:16.300 --> 01:31:21.300] So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:21.300 --> 01:31:31.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.300 --> 01:31:36.300] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.300 --> 01:31:38.300] The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.300 --> 01:31:43.300] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.300 --> 01:31:46.300] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.300 --> 01:31:49.300] And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.300 --> 01:31:50.300] I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.300 --> 01:31:51.300] I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.300 --> 01:31:52.300] I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.300 --> 01:31:53.300] I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.300 --> 01:31:55.300] I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.300 --> 01:31:58.300] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.300 --> 01:32:02.300] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.300 --> 01:32:05.300] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.300 --> 01:32:08.300] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[01:32:08.300 --> 01:32:10.300] and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.300 --> 01:32:13.300] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.300 --> 01:32:16.300] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:16.300 --> 01:32:18.300] the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:18.300 --> 01:32:20.300] and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.300 --> 01:32:23.300] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:23.300 --> 01:32:26.300] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.300 --> 01:32:29.300] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.300 --> 01:32:32.300] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:32.300 --> 01:32:34.300] that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.300 --> 01:32:36.300] and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.300 --> 01:32:38.300] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:38.300 --> 01:32:41.300] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.300 --> 01:32:43.300] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:43.300 --> 01:32:46.300] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:46.300 --> 01:32:48.300] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:48.300 --> 01:32:51.300] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.300 --> 01:32:55.300] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.300 --> 01:33:01.300] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:01.300 --> 01:33:11.300] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:34:01.300 --> 01:34:05.300] In the morning, chip you in the evening, chip you all the dinnertime.
[01:34:05.300 --> 01:34:10.300] Experiments and mankind, but man, you know, say them lie.
[01:34:10.300 --> 01:34:12.300] Well, we don't want no chip, man, you have your body.
[01:34:12.300 --> 01:34:15.300] Freedom or something, man, you fight for it.
[01:34:15.300 --> 01:34:17.300] You should tell them, let me read it.
[01:34:17.300 --> 01:34:20.300] Constitution set us free.
[01:34:20.300 --> 01:34:22.300] Planted them, put no chip in your body.
[01:34:22.300 --> 01:34:24.300] Put no chip in you, dog, except you see.
[01:34:24.300 --> 01:34:27.300] No put no chip in your cow and go eat it.
[01:34:27.300 --> 01:34:29.300] No put no chip in the fish and go eat it.
[01:34:29.300 --> 01:34:33.300] Island in the wheel and the shark in the sea.
[01:34:33.300 --> 01:34:35.300] Okay, we are back.
[01:34:35.300 --> 01:34:42.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio on this, the 18th day of August, 2022,
[01:34:42.300 --> 01:34:46.300] and we are talking to a Canuck of all things.
[01:34:46.300 --> 01:34:49.300] We don't discriminate against Canucks.
[01:34:49.300 --> 01:34:52.300] Go ahead, Joe.
[01:34:52.300 --> 01:34:55.300] All right, well, answer your question.
[01:34:55.300 --> 01:34:59.300] So far, like, all I can find is the criminal code of Canada.
[01:34:59.300 --> 01:35:06.300] I'm not finding any of the criminal rules in the Superior Court or anything.
[01:35:06.300 --> 01:35:10.300] It's not, we're not, not much is popping up.
[01:35:10.300 --> 01:35:11.300] So I don't...
[01:35:11.300 --> 01:35:15.300] Well, let me make a comment.
[01:35:15.300 --> 01:35:18.300] Canadian law is based on English law.
[01:35:18.300 --> 01:35:23.300] English law has been around for 800 years.
[01:35:23.300 --> 01:35:33.300] Every kind of scoundrel that you can imagine has attempted to adulterate this law.
[01:35:33.300 --> 01:35:44.300] Every issue you can imagine is in there because we've had legislators making laws for 800 years.
[01:35:44.300 --> 01:35:46.300] Anything you can come up with, it's in there.
[01:35:46.300 --> 01:35:48.300] If you haven't found it yet...
[01:35:48.300 --> 01:35:52.300] Yeah, what's the criminal procedure?
[01:35:52.300 --> 01:35:54.300] I think we just found it here.
[01:35:54.300 --> 01:35:59.300] I think it's criminal rules of the Ontario Court of Justice.
[01:35:59.300 --> 01:36:01.300] I think that might be it.
[01:36:01.300 --> 01:36:03.300] So I have to use that to see if...
[01:36:03.300 --> 01:36:06.300] I don't know.
[01:36:06.300 --> 01:36:11.300] I'm seeing something that says that there's a criminal procedure in Canada, third edition.
[01:36:11.300 --> 01:36:15.300] It looks like that would be, when I hear the word procedure,
[01:36:15.300 --> 01:36:19.300] that sounds to me more like what you're probably looking for.
[01:36:19.300 --> 01:36:23.300] Yeah, check out both of them.
[01:36:23.300 --> 01:36:24.300] What did you find, Brett?
[01:36:24.300 --> 01:36:26.300] Criminal procedure?
[01:36:26.300 --> 01:36:30.300] Yes, it says criminal procedure.
[01:36:30.300 --> 01:36:31.300] Okay.
[01:36:31.300 --> 01:36:32.300] Where is it at?
[01:36:32.300 --> 01:36:35.300] When and what part of law?
[01:36:35.300 --> 01:36:43.300] Pals-moi-justice.gc.ca.
[01:36:43.300 --> 01:36:45.300] It's got...
[01:36:45.300 --> 01:36:48.300] Let's see here.
[01:36:48.300 --> 01:36:52.300] Joe, send me an email.
[01:36:52.300 --> 01:36:59.300] I'll forward it to Brett, and he'll send you a link to what he's looking at.
[01:36:59.300 --> 01:37:02.300] Okay, I will do that.
[01:37:02.300 --> 01:37:08.300] Now, to continue my story here, Randy...
[01:37:08.300 --> 01:37:11.300] Yeah, okay, so we're on the Hades Corpus.
[01:37:11.300 --> 01:37:15.300] After that, when I docked off the documents to the Crown,
[01:37:15.300 --> 01:37:18.300] that's when she fabricated a story.
[01:37:18.300 --> 01:37:22.300] What she said was, in her allegations against me,
[01:37:22.300 --> 01:37:25.300] she said that I was aggressive inside and outside the courtroom.
[01:37:25.300 --> 01:37:27.300] Okay, okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:37:27.300 --> 01:37:29.300] She, who was she?
[01:37:29.300 --> 01:37:32.300] She's a Crown attorney.
[01:37:32.300 --> 01:37:35.300] Oh, okay, go ahead.
[01:37:35.300 --> 01:37:39.300] She said that I was warned by multiple justices,
[01:37:39.300 --> 01:37:46.300] let's say not to serve her documents in person that had to be served at her office.
[01:37:46.300 --> 01:37:50.300] She also claimed that I was chasing her down the hallway of the courthouse,
[01:37:50.300 --> 01:37:53.300] yelling at her that she doesn't know the law.
[01:37:53.300 --> 01:37:59.300] So that's when I got arrested and thrown in jail, and they kept me for 26 months.
[01:37:59.300 --> 01:38:06.300] Is it a specific statutory crime to yell at a prosecutor?
[01:38:06.300 --> 01:38:10.300] No, regardless, it never happened.
[01:38:10.300 --> 01:38:12.300] And when I first went in...
[01:38:12.300 --> 01:38:17.300] Well, even if it did happen, is it a crime?
[01:38:17.300 --> 01:38:23.300] No, even when I served the documents to the Crown and the cops came to my door,
[01:38:23.300 --> 01:38:28.300] all they told me that it was improper.
[01:38:28.300 --> 01:38:30.300] Okay, hold on, hold on, wait a minute.
[01:38:30.300 --> 01:38:36.300] You served the documents to the Crown and the cops came to your door?
[01:38:36.300 --> 01:38:39.300] Yes, because she filed a criminal complaint.
[01:38:39.300 --> 01:38:43.300] Oh, okay.
[01:38:43.300 --> 01:38:47.300] Now we're getting deeper.
[01:38:47.300 --> 01:38:48.300] Yes.
[01:38:48.300 --> 01:38:52.300] She filed a criminal complaint against you alleging what?
[01:38:52.300 --> 01:38:58.300] Intimidation and criminal harassment.
[01:38:58.300 --> 01:39:02.300] She may have a point there.
[01:39:02.300 --> 01:39:08.300] Did you speak to her outside the courtroom?
[01:39:08.300 --> 01:39:12.300] Never.
[01:39:12.300 --> 01:39:23.300] So under what is the claim of harassment or intimidation?
[01:39:23.300 --> 01:39:29.300] No, just that, just because I served her the documents.
[01:39:29.300 --> 01:39:35.300] And that's the thing, I hired a lawyer to do my bail when I first, first got arrested,
[01:39:35.300 --> 01:39:40.300] and he told the judge, he's like, I would like you to proceed in this matter with extreme caution
[01:39:40.300 --> 01:39:43.300] because there is absolutely no evidence.
[01:39:43.300 --> 01:39:48.300] And he says, I asked the Crown for some, for what this man is being accused of.
[01:39:48.300 --> 01:39:53.300] They will not provide me with any evidence at all.
[01:39:53.300 --> 01:39:59.300] But the reason why they kept me in jail is because they were trying to break me to get a lawyer
[01:39:59.300 --> 01:40:04.300] because they even forced, even throughout my trial, I shouldn't say my trial, my hearing,
[01:40:04.300 --> 01:40:13.300] they, in Canada, I don't know if it's the same in the States, but they forced an amicus puree on me.
[01:40:13.300 --> 01:40:15.300] They called it a friend of the court.
[01:40:15.300 --> 01:40:21.300] And this man even spoke on my behalf in court, and I served him a lawyer,
[01:40:21.300 --> 01:40:30.300] a letter stating that he had no authority to speak on my behalf or on behalf of my legal fiction.
[01:40:30.300 --> 01:40:31.300] Okay, hold on.
[01:40:31.300 --> 01:40:35.300] Have you been listening to our show for a while?
[01:40:35.300 --> 01:40:41.300] Well, I got out of jail in beginning of March, and I hopped in Alfonso's group shortly after that.
[01:40:41.300 --> 01:40:43.300] So I've been listening to your show.
[01:40:43.300 --> 01:40:56.300] Okay. You need to send me an e-mail to Randy at RuleOfLawRail.com
[01:40:56.300 --> 01:41:03.300] and ask for an introduction to Ted Scarlett.
[01:41:03.300 --> 01:41:08.300] You two need to talk.
[01:41:08.300 --> 01:41:10.300] To Ted Scarlett?
[01:41:10.300 --> 01:41:13.300] Yes.
[01:41:13.300 --> 01:41:14.300] Okay.
[01:41:14.300 --> 01:41:20.300] He's in a situation that sounds similar to what you're in.
[01:41:20.300 --> 01:41:29.300] They've been after him for seven years in and out of court, and they have forced attorneys on him,
[01:41:29.300 --> 01:41:36.300] and he will be able to give you some really good insight on how to deal with those guys.
[01:41:36.300 --> 01:41:38.300] Okay.
[01:41:38.300 --> 01:41:42.300] So before we go much deeper, call back tomorrow night,
[01:41:42.300 --> 01:41:50.300] but in the meantime, send me an e-mail to Randy at RuleOfLawRail.com.
[01:41:50.300 --> 01:41:54.300] Ask for an introduction to Ted Scarlett.
[01:41:54.300 --> 01:42:02.300] I will forward that to him, and maybe we can get both of you on tomorrow night.
[01:42:02.300 --> 01:42:05.300] Sounds good.
[01:42:05.300 --> 01:42:08.300] Okay. I can do that.
[01:42:08.300 --> 01:42:13.300] Okay. Do that, and this sounds like it's going to get interesting.
[01:42:13.300 --> 01:42:15.300] All right.
[01:42:15.300 --> 01:42:17.300] Okay.
[01:42:17.300 --> 01:42:18.300] Thank you, Joe.
[01:42:18.300 --> 01:42:19.300] We need to move quickly.
[01:42:19.300 --> 01:42:24.300] We've got three callers and one segment left.
[01:42:24.300 --> 01:42:27.300] Okay. Thank you, Joe.
[01:42:27.300 --> 01:42:30.300] We have Eric in Massachusetts.
[01:42:30.300 --> 01:42:32.300] Eric, what do you have for us today?
[01:42:32.300 --> 01:42:35.300] Go quickly. I'm sorry we're running out of time.
[01:42:35.300 --> 01:42:40.300] If we run out of time on you, call back tomorrow night, and we'll take you early.
[01:42:40.300 --> 01:42:45.300] Okay. That was an awesome segment, because that was actually my first question.
[01:42:45.300 --> 01:42:52.300] I'm suffering from Zoom court, basically, and I actually posted it on your telegram.
[01:42:52.300 --> 01:42:58.300] So everything, my question is basically on your telegram with my supporting documents and exactly like that.
[01:42:58.300 --> 01:43:08.300] Okay. On the telegram and on the show, I've talked about O'Connor's litigation guides.
[01:43:08.300 --> 01:43:18.300] I was reading through O'Connor's litigation guides, and I came across a section out of the Rules of Civil
[01:43:18.300 --> 01:43:28.300] Procedure or somewhere, I'm going to have to go back and find it, where for a Zoom hearing, for a, let's see,
[01:43:28.300 --> 01:43:37.300] it didn't say Zoom, it said an electronic hearing, both parties had to agree and light it.
[01:43:37.300 --> 01:43:40.300] Do you have anything like that in Massachusetts?
[01:43:40.300 --> 01:43:41.300] No.
[01:43:41.300 --> 01:43:42.300] Hang on.
[01:43:42.300 --> 01:43:43.300] Okay. Hang on.
[01:43:43.300 --> 01:43:48.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wood of our radio, I'll call, no, I'm not going to have to call that number.
[01:43:48.300 --> 01:43:50.300] We only got one segment left.
[01:43:50.300 --> 01:43:57.300] We got E.J. in California and, whoa, Jay Williams, that looks like a first time caller.
[01:43:57.300 --> 01:43:59.300] We'll be right back.
[01:43:59.300 --> 01:44:01.300] Dang, cookies.
[01:44:01.300 --> 01:44:03.300] Cookies? Me love cookies.
[01:44:03.300 --> 01:44:06.300] Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers. No, these are yucky cookies.
[01:44:06.300 --> 01:44:09.300] Cookies? Yucky? No, no bad cookies.
[01:44:09.300 --> 01:44:12.300] You can't even eat these cookies. These are cyber cookies.
[01:44:12.300 --> 01:44:13.300] No yucky?
[01:44:13.300 --> 01:44:16.300] No, they're cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[01:44:16.300 --> 01:44:17.300] These are apples.
[01:44:17.300 --> 01:44:20.300] Really? Oh, that's an actual apple.
[01:44:20.300 --> 01:44:22.300] Yummy apple.
[01:44:22.300 --> 01:44:26.300] I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[01:44:26.300 --> 01:44:32.300] I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[01:44:32.300 --> 01:44:34.300] Bye bye, yucky cookies.
[01:44:34.300 --> 01:44:40.300] Now, I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box in the upper right-hand side,
[01:44:40.300 --> 01:44:47.300] bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[01:44:47.300 --> 01:44:48.300] New cookies? For me?
[01:44:48.300 --> 01:44:50.300] Consider it an early Christmas present.
[01:44:50.300 --> 01:44:57.300] And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network, too.
[01:44:57.300 --> 01:44:58.300] C is for cookie.
[01:44:58.300 --> 01:45:00.300] C is for classified.
[01:45:00.300 --> 01:45:03.300] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.300 --> 01:45:07.300] Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.300 --> 01:45:15.300] The affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.300 --> 01:45:19.300] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.300 --> 01:45:23.300] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.300 --> 01:45:28.300] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[01:45:28.300 --> 01:45:34.300] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.300 --> 01:45:43.300] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.300 --> 01:45:52.300] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.300 --> 01:46:04.300] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.300 --> 01:46:26.300] Something in this world I will never understand.
[01:46:26.300 --> 01:46:30.300] Something I realize fully.
[01:46:30.300 --> 01:46:35.300] Somebody's gonna police that policeman.
[01:46:35.300 --> 01:46:39.300] Somebody's gonna police the police.
[01:46:39.300 --> 01:46:45.300] There's always a room at the top of the hill.
[01:46:45.300 --> 01:46:52.300] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. We're on our last segment.
[01:46:52.300 --> 01:47:04.300] And Deborah's around. We used to, in the old days, when things were going well, extend the show when we didn't have anything else following.
[01:47:04.300 --> 01:47:16.300] Brett, while we're on, I'm handing Eric, could you call Deborah and see if she might extend the show so we can get to our last two callers?
[01:47:16.300 --> 01:47:17.300] Sure.
[01:47:17.300 --> 01:47:22.300] Thanks. Okay. Eric, where were we?
[01:47:22.300 --> 01:47:26.300] Okay. Well, let's get to my real question.
[01:47:26.300 --> 01:47:42.300] So, going back to Boston variance laws, a quick overview from what we discussed a month ago is I like the variance laws that Boston has established, and I'm trying to get them to enforce them.
[01:47:42.300 --> 01:47:50.300] Okay, variance laws. Does this go to coding, like the city codes?
[01:47:50.300 --> 01:47:57.300] Construction. So, we have a three, you know, let's say in my neighborhood it's a, you can only build up to three stories.
[01:47:57.300 --> 01:48:10.300] Well, now they're handing out variances like checklist saying, ah, you can build seven, you can build 17, you can build, so they're not upholding their variance laws.
[01:48:10.300 --> 01:48:20.300] All right. So, we have these codes, construction codes, that, you know, basically are there to protect people so they're not upholding them. All right. So, that's where we were a month ago.
[01:48:20.300 --> 01:48:27.300] So, you suggested finding a declaratory judgment action. All right. I did research on it. Very hard to find.
[01:48:27.300 --> 01:48:41.300] Massachusetts does not have self-standing, stand-alone, stand-alone, declaratory judgment action in any of the state courts, but it does have one in the federal court.
[01:48:41.300 --> 01:48:52.300] So, my question is, how do I take this to the federal court and establish a self-standing declaratory judgment action?
[01:48:52.300 --> 01:49:11.300] Well, just because you don't have a specific declaratory judgment act doesn't mean that you can't petition the court in a motion to rule on a point of law.
[01:49:11.300 --> 01:49:25.300] The declaratory judgment act was intended to avoid unnecessary litigation. So, they said, okay, rather than file a full-on lawsuit,
[01:49:25.300 --> 01:49:44.300] it will allow you to bring a question on point of law separate. If Massachusetts hasn't done that, you can still, say, file a minor suit.
[01:49:44.300 --> 01:49:56.300] I really want to go to the feds instead. I mean, I've had five cases that I've fought all the way up to the Supreme Court and won. And basically, you just keep pushing me away.
[01:49:56.300 --> 01:50:05.300] Wait a minute. Did I hear what I thought I heard? You had five cases you fought up to the Supreme and won?
[01:50:05.300 --> 01:50:14.300] Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no. Only one of them did I take to the Supreme Court. None of them have I won.
[01:50:14.300 --> 01:50:31.300] Okay, then you're in good company. I have 750, none of which I won directly. A whole bunch of them we won by getting a good deal, but none of them directly in the court.
[01:50:31.300 --> 01:50:45.300] Okay. I don't, you know, I'm thinking I don't think I can't find a way to get local building code to the Fed.
[01:50:45.300 --> 01:50:53.300] How do you get out of Massachusetts on building code to the Fed?
[01:50:53.300 --> 01:51:06.300] I mean, again, I think RICO, I mean, I'm going to file a case basically as a RICO Act because there's on one specific case, there's so many things going on where they have ADA.
[01:51:06.300 --> 01:51:15.300] They're not compliant with ADA and there, you know, there's so much sort of things going on. I think there's, you know, basically.
[01:51:15.300 --> 01:51:26.300] Okay, that answers the question. ADA is how you get to the Fed's. Do you have any other federal questions?
[01:51:26.300 --> 01:51:42.300] Okay, there you have ordinances that appear to restrict, you mentioned building heights, three stores, and they've approved 5, 10, whatever.
[01:51:42.300 --> 01:51:58.300] Is there anything in those exceptions that they're allowing that interfere with the rights of citizens? How does that become a problem?
[01:51:58.300 --> 01:52:06.300] Well, again, this was potentially where it goes to RICO. So they said, they set out saying we're going to build more housing.
[01:52:06.300 --> 01:52:16.300] And our purpose in building more housing is to reduce rent. So what they're doing is they're taking money from me and giving it to another person.
[01:52:16.300 --> 01:52:26.300] They're taking my rent, intentionally reducing it, and giving it to another person. That's collusion. That's RICO. That's what have you.
[01:52:26.300 --> 01:52:36.300] Not only that, so now they're taking my rent away from me. By doing so, they're also taking my property value away. My property is a business.
[01:52:36.300 --> 01:52:48.300] By taking away its income, you're reducing the value of this business. So they're hurting me monthly and they're hurting the value of my property.
[01:52:48.300 --> 01:52:54.300] I'm trying to, as you're saying this, I'm trying to think, how does this get me to the Fed?
[01:52:54.300 --> 01:53:03.300] The other thing, let's ponder this. So the state court, when I bring these cases forward, they say you don't have standing, right?
[01:53:03.300 --> 01:53:11.300] Because you live in a multifamily, because you're not close enough, because whatever reason, no matter what it is, you don't have standing.
[01:53:11.300 --> 01:53:23.300] And so what I'm saying is that's a deprivation of right. They're not giving me due process on this false claim of no standing.
[01:53:23.300 --> 01:53:27.300] You don't have standing.
[01:53:27.300 --> 01:53:42.300] That's a complex issue to say what grants you standing and what doesn't. That's going to be very state specific.
[01:53:42.300 --> 01:53:52.300] Yeah, but the problem is that nothing has standing. Anybody who's filing cases like me ends up basically getting pushed off because they don't have standing.
[01:53:52.300 --> 01:53:59.300] So what would it take to have standing?
[01:53:59.300 --> 01:54:04.300] Well, that's a good question. What would it take? Because nobody's got it here in Boston.
[01:54:04.300 --> 01:54:17.300] Okay. So have they created a condition such that they have denied everyone standing? That would seem to go to a constitutional issue.
[01:54:17.300 --> 01:54:19.300] Agreed.
[01:54:19.300 --> 01:54:39.300] So how would you argue that the ordinances as they stand amount to a conspiracy on part of the city or whatever entity it is,
[01:54:39.300 --> 01:54:59.300] that while the ordinances may appear to be facially valid, that the combined effect of the ordinances deny due process?
[01:54:59.300 --> 01:55:11.300] The other thing I forgot to remind you about during this conversation is that these variance laws were written where it's a two party signed project.
[01:55:11.300 --> 01:55:18.300] Basically, the neighborhood signed it and the mayor signed it. So I've been trying to tell these courts, hey, this is a contract.
[01:55:18.300 --> 01:55:23.300] And they refuse to look at it because I don't have standing. So that's another avenue.
[01:55:23.300 --> 01:55:31.300] Okay. What does the neighborhood mean? You said the neighborhood signed it. What is that for the neighborhood?
[01:55:31.300 --> 01:55:40.300] So this goes back to 1991. So they got together a group and over a five year time period, they decided all the variance laws.
[01:55:40.300 --> 01:55:48.300] So you have a meeting of the minds, you have an agreement, you have consideration, and you have a two party signed document.
[01:55:48.300 --> 01:56:00.300] Okay. They put together a group. Who put together what group and what standing authority did they have to put together that group?
[01:56:00.300 --> 01:56:09.300] Well, they're the city. So they have the way to create laws and ordinances and not really laws, but ordinances and guidelines.
[01:56:09.300 --> 01:56:13.300] So they themselves set up this framework.
[01:56:13.300 --> 01:56:26.300] What are the limitations on the, oh, wait a minute. Who gave the city the power to create these ordinances?
[01:56:26.300 --> 01:56:34.300] And where did, I take it that was the legislature. And where did the legislature get the authority to delegate its authority?
[01:56:34.300 --> 01:56:42.300] Well, I mean, this is the way it is throughout the United States in every single town. So that question can be posed.
[01:56:42.300 --> 01:56:58.300] No, no, no. What I'm going to is if you're to beat these guys, you're presupposing things. You're presupposing they can do that.
[01:56:58.300 --> 01:57:09.300] If we're going to take them on effectively, we need to be able to show exactly, precisely how they have each authority.
[01:57:09.300 --> 01:57:13.300] Where you'll get these guys are in the details.
[01:57:13.300 --> 01:57:23.300] We took on a municipality in a small town in Texas for this guy, and we filed a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction,
[01:57:23.300 --> 01:57:37.300] claiming that the ordinances did not apply to a private citizen, that ordinances were enacted by municipalities and not by the legislature.
[01:57:37.300 --> 01:57:46.300] Only the legislature can enact law. They allowed municipalities to enact ordinances.
[01:57:46.300 --> 01:57:56.300] But those ordinances could not apply to the general public, because if they did, they would have the effect of law.
[01:57:56.300 --> 01:58:10.300] And the court, we filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and the court came up with a reason to give us our ruling that we didn't petition for.
[01:58:10.300 --> 01:58:17.300] We said that if you apply that ordinance to the individual, that's an unconstitutional application.
[01:58:17.300 --> 01:58:24.300] And they said, well, these guys didn't hold a meeting right, so we're going to throw everything out.
[01:58:24.300 --> 01:58:30.300] They did that to make sure our claim did not get before the Supreme.
[01:58:30.300 --> 01:58:43.300] How does the municipality or whoever is issuing those warrants, those ordinances, enact them against you?
[01:58:43.300 --> 01:58:50.300] Hang on. I'm sorry. We're out of time. Good night all.
[01:58:50.300 --> 01:58:58.300] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.300 --> 01:59:06.300] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:59:06.300 --> 01:59:09.300] Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:09.300 --> 01:59:18.300] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.300 --> 01:59:28.300] The difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.300 --> 01:59:33.300] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.300 --> 01:59:47.300] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.300 --> 01:59:50.300] That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:50.300 --> 02:00:18.300] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.