ROL_2022-06-03_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.080]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution that guarantee
[00:05.080 --> 00:08.280]  the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:08.280 --> 00:09.760]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:09.760 --> 00:13.680]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:13.680 --> 00:15.800]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:15.800 --> 00:17.400]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:17.400 --> 00:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:21.000 --> 00:25.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[00:25.760 --> 00:30.840]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:30.840 --> 00:31.840]  Privacy.
[00:31.840 --> 00:33.520]  It's worth hanging on to.
[00:33.520 --> 00:37.800]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:37.800 --> 00:41.360]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:41.360 --> 00:43.360]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:43.360 --> 00:44.360]  Spar.
[00:44.360 --> 00:46.640]  It's what fighters do.
[00:46.640 --> 00:49.600]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:49.600 --> 00:53.320]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:53.320 --> 01:00.400]  Spar with an extra P. S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:00.400 --> 01:01.760]  and R for religion.
[01:01.760 --> 01:05.840]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:05.840 --> 01:07.360]  assembly, and religion.
[01:07.360 --> 01:09.720]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:09.720 --> 01:13.440]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:13.440 --> 01:16.960]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:16.960 --> 01:19.640]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:19.640 --> 01:29.960]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:29.960 --> 01:33.640]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:33.640 --> 01:37.080]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:37.080 --> 01:38.520]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:38.520 --> 01:42.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:42.460 --> 01:45.600]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:45.600 --> 01:47.200]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:47.200 --> 01:50.800]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:50.800 --> 01:55.560]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:55.560 --> 02:00.560]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:00.560 --> 02:03.320]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:03.320 --> 02:07.620]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:07.620 --> 02:11.160]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:11.160 --> 02:14.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:14.760 --> 02:19.080]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:19.080 --> 02:21.160]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:21.160 --> 02:25.680]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:25.680 --> 02:29.480]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:29.480 --> 02:30.480]  Get it?
[02:30.480 --> 02:32.800]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:32.800 --> 02:36.400]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:36.400 --> 02:42.160]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary
[02:42.160 --> 02:46.720]  conduct, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which
[02:46.720 --> 02:49.360]  historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:49.360 --> 02:51.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:51.320 --> 03:14.760]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:14.760 --> 03:34.960]  Good evening, this is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, I'm Brett Fountain, and this
[03:34.960 --> 03:40.080]  is Friday, the 3rd of June, 2022.
[03:40.080 --> 03:44.480]  And I'm going to go ahead and start by opening up the phone lines.
[03:44.480 --> 03:51.200]  We do not have Randy with us this evening, but feel free to call in, and the number is
[03:51.200 --> 03:52.200]  512-646-1984.
[03:52.200 --> 03:53.200]  512-646-1984.
[03:53.200 --> 04:07.600]  So yeah, I heard from Randy, he's having some trouble this evening, he's not going to be
[04:07.600 --> 04:10.440]  able to join us, probably not.
[04:10.440 --> 04:19.920]  So call in, or else you just might have to listen to whatever I have to say.
[04:19.920 --> 04:24.120]  I was thinking about some different things we could talk about.
[04:24.120 --> 04:30.640]  People seem to be pleased with what they heard in last night's kind of a breakneck, roll
[04:30.640 --> 04:34.400]  through of discovery in court.
[04:34.400 --> 04:41.920]  I did re-listen to it myself, and I felt like it came across pretty disjointed, and lots
[04:41.920 --> 04:47.560]  of ideas, and oh this, oh and that, oh and this, and there's this, but it wasn't presented
[04:47.560 --> 04:53.960]  in a very linear and modular kind of way, so I apologize about that, if it seemed that
[04:53.960 --> 04:54.960]  way to you.
[04:54.960 --> 05:01.240]  Apparently some people were pleased with that, so I'm glad they got something out of it.
[05:01.240 --> 05:10.800]  Another thing we could talk about this evening is sort of a sister to discovery or a twin
[05:10.800 --> 05:14.120]  is records requests.
[05:14.120 --> 05:21.720]  Outside of a court case, if you ever need something, it's going to be accessible via
[05:21.720 --> 05:23.720]  records requests.
[05:23.720 --> 05:27.960]  You don't have discovery tools until you're in court, but sometimes you're not going to
[05:27.960 --> 05:33.840]  get to court very quickly, you may not even know yet who the defendants are or whether
[05:33.840 --> 05:39.800]  you exactly have a case, you might just need to be figuring it out.
[05:39.800 --> 05:40.800]  Who are you charging?
[05:40.800 --> 05:43.000]  What are you charging them with?
[05:43.000 --> 05:44.520]  Maybe you're not even going to sue them.
[05:44.520 --> 05:49.440]  Maybe you just come with enough details, you figure out, oh this is just a criminal matter
[05:49.440 --> 05:55.580]  and I'm just going to handle it like that.
[05:55.580 --> 06:04.320]  Maybe just to a little side note here, criminal and civil, some people tend to get that mixed
[06:04.320 --> 06:11.720]  up or maybe not realize that there is a distinction and let me just briefly touch on what happens
[06:11.720 --> 06:19.320]  in a court, if you're charging somebody criminally with something, then you don't have standing
[06:19.320 --> 06:20.600]  in the case.
[06:20.600 --> 06:26.920]  You are doing your part, like your civic duty to, hey I'm aware of some crime, I'm going
[06:26.920 --> 06:32.000]  to go ahead and put a piece of paperwork into the proper hopper and somebody's going to
[06:32.000 --> 06:38.160]  do something about it, but you're not going to get any money out of this.
[06:38.160 --> 06:43.160]  You may or may not get called in as a witness up on the witness stand in some court case
[06:43.160 --> 06:55.280]  if they do get a determination of probable cause, whether it's a grand jury or a magistrate,
[06:55.280 --> 06:58.080]  they might have to stand in answer for this or they might not.
[06:58.080 --> 07:02.840]  It depends on what happens along the way, but either way you're not getting any money
[07:02.840 --> 07:03.840]  out of the deal.
[07:03.840 --> 07:12.840]  You've just simply done your good deed, sort of the way I look at it is I am fulfilling
[07:12.840 --> 07:16.280]  my implicit responsibility to my fellow man.
[07:16.280 --> 07:24.480]  You know we all want to have peace and seek peace and pursue peace as much as it depends
[07:24.480 --> 07:28.200]  on you, peace with all men.
[07:28.200 --> 07:36.520]  And part of this, part of your peace depends on me pursuing peace and vice versa.
[07:36.520 --> 07:44.520]  Part of my ability to live in peace with all men is going to depend on you doing your civic
[07:44.520 --> 07:51.660]  duty when you see some public official, one of these people that we hired, going off and
[07:51.660 --> 07:57.600]  doing things they're not allowed to do, either they're unauthorized or they are refusing
[07:57.600 --> 08:01.000]  to do the things that they have a duty to do.
[08:01.000 --> 08:08.680]  That's a crime and that works against our peace, the peace of all fellow men, right?
[08:08.680 --> 08:18.160]  So sometimes when you're, back to records requests, sometimes you're finding some facts,
[08:18.160 --> 08:20.480]  you're figuring out what's going on.
[08:20.480 --> 08:28.080]  We have some people in Texas right now figuring out, oh my goodness, there's so much sexual
[08:28.080 --> 08:34.520]  perversion being pushed in some schools.
[08:34.520 --> 08:36.880]  And what in the world are we going to do about that?
[08:36.880 --> 08:39.280]  So they're starting out with records requests.
[08:39.280 --> 08:45.840]  They haven't exactly figured out who's doing this, although obviously it's horrible.
[08:45.840 --> 08:56.080]  They're teaching kindergartners about things that I didn't hear about until maybe 40.
[08:56.080 --> 09:05.480]  So it's completely inappropriate and yet how do you approach this?
[09:05.480 --> 09:09.360]  You're not necessarily going to start out suing somebody.
[09:09.360 --> 09:13.920]  You don't know exactly what the charges are to claim.
[09:13.920 --> 09:19.560]  You can't say, I'm going to claim that they, you have to have a cause of action, right?
[09:19.560 --> 09:22.200]  Well, first off, let's get some data.
[09:22.200 --> 09:23.200]  Let's get some information.
[09:23.200 --> 09:30.960]  What are the names of these books, who ordered them, who authorizes this, which budget did
[09:30.960 --> 09:39.640]  it come out of, which eyes looked at this and checked off on it, who's deciding to bring
[09:39.640 --> 09:40.640]  this in the first place?
[09:40.640 --> 09:46.040]  So you start figuring that out, start following the money and now you have some information
[09:46.040 --> 09:47.480]  that you can charge people with.
[09:47.480 --> 09:50.040]  Now you have some names too.
[09:50.040 --> 09:55.680]  But anyway, records requests are like discovery.
[09:55.680 --> 10:03.240]  You're asking people to produce records, except records requests is more broad.
[10:03.240 --> 10:10.800]  Discovery is, I'm sorry, the discovery is more broad.
[10:10.800 --> 10:16.680]  Records requests are just for your governmental officials.
[10:16.680 --> 10:26.440]  You cannot go to a grocery store and ask them to produce records.
[10:26.440 --> 10:31.000]  If you feel like you have a case, you need to do something called pre-litigation discovery
[10:31.000 --> 10:35.440]  because that's the only way, discovery is the only way you're going to get somebody
[10:35.440 --> 10:41.120]  that's not a governmental official to produce records.
[10:41.120 --> 10:48.000]  Now outside of a case, you want records, you can be asking for all kinds of things.
[10:48.000 --> 10:52.560]  It doesn't have to be about getting somebody in trouble.
[10:52.560 --> 10:59.260]  You could be, there could be no problem, but you're just curious.
[10:59.260 --> 11:07.120]  How many people have filed such and such a paper form for property taxes in this county
[11:07.120 --> 11:12.760]  over here and you can reach out to that county and you can ask them for those records and
[11:12.760 --> 11:14.880]  they must answer you.
[11:14.880 --> 11:21.680]  There's a different set of rules in different states and jurisdictions.
[11:21.680 --> 11:27.720]  In the Fed it's called FOIA and in different states they have different little acronyms
[11:27.720 --> 11:36.360]  that support the mandate for governmental transparency.
[11:36.360 --> 11:48.000]  Texas, it's the Texas government code section 552 and it has a handy little acronym PIA,
[11:48.000 --> 11:51.480]  Public Information Act, and it's different in different states, they'll have different
[11:51.480 --> 11:56.920]  little acronyms in different places, but you just go find your local transparency mandate
[11:56.920 --> 11:59.800]  that are statutorily required to respond to us.
[11:59.800 --> 12:03.880]  We the people created the government, these are instruments of our creation and they're
[12:03.880 --> 12:08.720]  serving us, the people.
[12:08.720 --> 12:15.560]  When we decide we want to see some records, well, they better hop to it.
[12:15.560 --> 12:17.520]  I think I might just pause on this.
[12:17.520 --> 12:20.400]  I just noticed that our caller board is full already.
[12:20.400 --> 12:24.160]  I'm going to go ahead and start taking some calls.
[12:24.160 --> 12:29.280]  We'll get back to records requests if we hit a lull, but I'd like to not leave you guys
[12:29.280 --> 12:30.280]  waiting.
[12:30.280 --> 12:36.720]  Let's see, we've got four minutes until the next break and our first caller here is Nicholas
[12:36.720 --> 12:37.720]  in Nevada.
[12:37.720 --> 12:38.720]  Good evening, Nicholas.
[12:38.720 --> 12:39.720]  What's on your mind?
[12:39.720 --> 12:44.480]  Well, hello and thanks for having me.
[12:44.480 --> 12:55.240]  I called on Thursday a week ago and I have a criminal complaint based on the Fourth Amendment,
[12:55.240 --> 13:03.800]  the First Amendment and then the Nevada Article 1, Section 18, which says that we are not
[13:03.800 --> 13:09.800]  to be put under unreasonable seizure and search unless there's an issuance of a warrant and
[13:09.800 --> 13:11.280]  that we're securing our persons.
[13:11.280 --> 13:21.240]  And yet, only at the Board of County Commissioners here in Washoe County do they put up a mental
[13:21.240 --> 13:28.720]  detector and then they have you empty your pockets or look through people's purses and
[13:28.720 --> 13:33.440]  handbags before they allow you to go in the chambers.
[13:33.440 --> 13:39.200]  I started challenging them, asking them by what authority they had to violate my Fourth
[13:39.200 --> 13:43.000]  Amendment and challenge them that I have the right to go in.
[13:43.000 --> 13:48.360]  They said, you only have a right to go in here if you will submit to a violation of
[13:48.360 --> 13:49.360]  your Fourth Amendment.
[13:49.360 --> 13:54.400]  So, I asked them what their authority was and they said they had a piracy.
[13:54.400 --> 13:55.400]  Oh, that's interesting.
[13:55.400 --> 14:02.920]  So, I said, show me the piracy and they said, you can go up to the manager's office and
[14:02.920 --> 14:03.920]  get it.
[14:03.920 --> 14:10.400]  So, I did before all that, I had gone ahead and put in a public records request like you
[14:10.400 --> 14:18.600]  were just talking about and ended up with an email that came back and said because some
[14:18.600 --> 14:27.960]  guy had gone in in 2015 and purportedly was threatening to drink pesticide in the chambers
[14:27.960 --> 14:35.160]  and because there were other things going on around the country that somehow somebody
[14:35.160 --> 14:43.800]  decided that they would put up a mental detector and screen us even though there was no probable
[14:43.800 --> 14:46.200]  cause and there was no warrant.
[14:46.200 --> 14:51.240]  And so, I challenged them on, so they sent the thing back which really didn't answer
[14:51.240 --> 14:52.240]  the question.
[14:52.240 --> 14:55.840]  The only thing it did say was that there wasn't a written one.
[14:55.840 --> 15:00.200]  So, I've been back numerous times, now I've been back five times, I record every single
[15:00.200 --> 15:01.200]  one of them.
[15:01.200 --> 15:04.000]  Now, wait a second, this wasn't written, written what?
[15:04.000 --> 15:05.000]  A policy?
[15:05.000 --> 15:06.000]  A written request.
[15:06.000 --> 15:07.000]  No, written policy.
[15:07.000 --> 15:08.000]  Oh.
[15:08.000 --> 15:09.000]  So, I go in.
[15:09.000 --> 15:10.000]  Wait.
[15:10.000 --> 15:14.760]  So, this policy is just in people's head?
[15:14.760 --> 15:15.760]  Apparently.
[15:15.760 --> 15:16.760]  Wow.
[15:16.760 --> 15:17.760]  Okay.
[15:17.760 --> 15:22.240]  So, every time I go in, I demand they show me the policy and so we've been around and
[15:22.240 --> 15:28.400]  around and around at the point that they finally bring out the head of security for the Washoe
[15:28.400 --> 15:32.000]  County, the administrator of Washoe County security.
[15:32.000 --> 15:37.640]  So, Ben West came in and I've been around and around with him now and on the last time
[15:37.640 --> 15:43.560]  I finally got him to stay on record with us recording it from two different people that
[15:43.560 --> 15:44.920]  there was no written policy.
[15:44.920 --> 15:51.800]  I said, then you don't have the right to violate and force me to do, you know, get
[15:51.800 --> 15:53.800]  searched.
[15:53.800 --> 15:57.120]  And so, I've talked to the sheriff's department, I've talked to one of the top guys, one of
[15:57.120 --> 16:03.600]  the chiefs there and said, listen, they either forced me to violate the Fourth Amendment
[16:03.600 --> 16:09.080]  so I can have my first or they deny me my first because I refuse to be violated through
[16:09.080 --> 16:11.240]  my fourth.
[16:11.240 --> 16:15.640]  And so, they're supposed to have talked to the head of security, that went nowhere.
[16:15.640 --> 16:21.840]  So, then I called 911 and they sent out five sheriff deputies to talk to me and they've
[16:21.840 --> 16:27.520]  called the sheriff on me before, several of these guys already know me.
[16:27.520 --> 16:35.840]  And they decided that we're in different times and so they're just trying to protect everyone
[16:35.840 --> 16:36.840]  and that's the policy.
[16:36.840 --> 16:37.840]  Different times.
[16:37.840 --> 16:42.240]  They decided they were going to do by policy, they'd be policy enforcement officers instead
[16:42.240 --> 16:44.960]  of law enforcement officers.
[16:44.960 --> 16:46.960]  We are in different times.
[16:46.960 --> 16:47.960]  Okay.
[16:47.960 --> 16:51.560]  Well, that's going to not hold up for them very well.
[16:51.560 --> 16:53.280]  Let's talk about this some more.
[16:53.280 --> 16:59.320]  We're just about to go to our sponsors and we will be right back.
[16:59.320 --> 17:04.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[17:04.000 --> 17:08.120]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[17:08.120 --> 17:12.440]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[17:12.440 --> 17:13.440]  can win too.
[17:13.440 --> 17:18.400]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:18.400 --> 17:24.040]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer
[17:24.040 --> 17:28.680]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[17:28.680 --> 17:32.880]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:32.880 --> 17:37.680]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:37.680 --> 17:39.840]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:39.840 --> 17:45.640]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:45.640 --> 17:48.640]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[17:48.640 --> 17:57.640]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-m at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[17:57.640 --> 17:59.640]  collectors now.
[17:59.640 --> 18:03.640]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[18:03.640 --> 18:07.520]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society and if we, the people, are ever going
[18:07.520 --> 18:11.080]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:11.080 --> 18:14.680]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:14.680 --> 18:18.320]  in our own private capacity and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:18.320 --> 18:22.560]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:22.560 --> 18:23.920]  our rights through due process.
[18:23.920 --> 18:27.920]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[18:27.920 --> 18:31.720]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:31.720 --> 18:33.760]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:33.760 --> 18:38.080]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:38.080 --> 18:39.440]  ordering your copy today.
[18:39.440 --> 18:42.800]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:42.800 --> 18:47.200]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:47.200 --> 18:49.520]  documents and other useful resource material.
[18:49.520 --> 18:53.480]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:53.480 --> 18:57.200]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:57.200 --> 18:58.200]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, www.logosradionetwork.com.
[18:58.200 --> 19:27.120]  Okay.
[19:27.120 --> 19:28.120]  We are back.
[19:28.120 --> 19:30.920]  This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton.
[19:30.920 --> 19:36.320]  I'm Brett Fountain and we're talking this evening with Nicholas in Nevada.
[19:36.320 --> 19:42.600]  Nicholas, right before we went to the sponsors, you were telling us that you've got federal
[19:42.600 --> 19:50.320]  complaints and you've got them to admit that they don't have any business blocking you
[19:50.320 --> 19:51.320]  from there.
[19:51.320 --> 19:54.840]  They don't even have their policy, which can't override law anyway.
[19:54.840 --> 20:02.600]  And their policy unwritten is to deny you and your rights, to deprive you of fundamental
[20:02.600 --> 20:04.640]  protected rights.
[20:04.640 --> 20:09.360]  And that the only thing that they've come up with so far is because these are different
[20:09.360 --> 20:10.360]  times.
[20:10.360 --> 20:15.880]  So where are you planning on going with this or is that your question?
[20:15.880 --> 20:21.440]  Well, I have written criminal complaint on five of them.
[20:21.440 --> 20:27.760]  I have one against the county commissioner, who is chair of the board when they put in
[20:27.760 --> 20:29.400]  the metal detector.
[20:29.400 --> 20:35.560]  I have one against Richard Shire, who is the head of Allied Universal Security, which is
[20:35.560 --> 20:44.080]  a private security firm that manages somewhat security for the county buildings, although
[20:44.080 --> 20:48.040]  women have the authority to trespass because they always have to call the sheriff.
[20:48.040 --> 20:56.080]  I have one against Ben West, who is the head of Washoe County Security, he's the administrator.
[20:56.080 --> 21:03.000]  And I have one against the sheriff officer, the deputy that was there, who I tried to
[21:03.000 --> 21:08.640]  engage and he refused to even engage and said, you've already talked to them, I'm not going
[21:08.640 --> 21:10.680]  to talk to you about this.
[21:10.680 --> 21:13.560]  And so I have five complaints already written.
[21:13.560 --> 21:19.960]  It covers everything from the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, Nevada Constitution,
[21:19.960 --> 21:27.200]  Article 1, Section 18, which is the same thing as the Fourth Amendment, coercion, they forced
[21:27.200 --> 21:35.120]  me to go through the detector, which is NRS Code 207.190, that's listed here, coercion.
[21:35.120 --> 21:40.440]  Also, because they kept me out of the meeting, I found out that they're actually a violation
[21:40.440 --> 21:45.600]  of NRS 203.090, disturbing a meeting, and they're disturbing the meeting by keeping
[21:45.600 --> 21:51.680]  someone who has every right and legal right to go to a lawful meeting out of that meeting
[21:51.680 --> 21:53.960]  and that's against the law.
[21:53.960 --> 22:06.920]  I also have another one, NRS 200.571.1.B, which also is harassment, because they only
[22:06.920 --> 22:13.080]  do this when we come in just for that one meeting held in those, in that building.
[22:13.080 --> 22:20.160]  So I have all of this put together and then I have one final one where it's all, it's
[22:20.160 --> 22:21.160]  conspiracy.
[22:21.160 --> 22:27.120]  So they don't have, there's no due process, there's no provocals, there's no warrants,
[22:27.120 --> 22:35.040]  and 199.4803E says to prevent another from doing any other lawful act by force, threats
[22:35.040 --> 22:37.000]  or intimidation.
[22:37.000 --> 22:45.400]  So I have all of this outlined, plus I think I have the deprivation, Title 18, USC 242,
[22:45.400 --> 22:47.160]  deprivation of rights under the color of law.
[22:47.160 --> 22:54.160]  So I have all of that in my two-page criminal complaint and I've looked at the magistrates
[22:54.160 --> 23:03.080]  and I found a magistrate here to file that with and I would like some input on what that
[23:03.080 --> 23:09.520]  looks like if you, you know, I guess you, I know Randy filed them, I'm guessing you
[23:09.520 --> 23:10.520]  filed them.
[23:10.520 --> 23:13.160]  What does that process look like once I file it?
[23:13.160 --> 23:16.840]  Are there fees that go along with that, which I don't think there are, but once I file
[23:16.840 --> 23:21.880]  it, what am I expecting to see after that, how long, because Randy doesn't expect them
[23:21.880 --> 23:22.880]  to do anything, right?
[23:22.880 --> 23:26.160]  They're going to table it or they're going to come up with some excuse not to do it,
[23:26.160 --> 23:32.200]  because in here, my opening statement is pursuant to my rights under the First Amendment of
[23:32.200 --> 23:37.440]  the United States Constitution, right to petition, hereby request that official appropriate criminal
[23:37.440 --> 23:45.320]  charges be filed against and that I name all five of these people separately so that each
[23:45.320 --> 23:48.280]  one of them gets their own separate criminal complaint.
[23:48.280 --> 23:52.560]  Okay, so let's just back up here, just back up a moment.
[23:52.560 --> 24:00.240]  You are, you are the one that's filing charges, you're not asking someone else to.
[24:00.240 --> 24:05.840]  Your criminal complaints need to land in the lap of someone who has a duty to act on them.
[24:05.840 --> 24:12.600]  So you're not asking somebody to write charges or to file charges.
[24:12.600 --> 24:19.960]  Your complaint is the lighting of the fuse, if you will.
[24:19.960 --> 24:26.960]  And it sounds like your issues here are federal issues, and so you'll be looking at federal
[24:26.960 --> 24:28.840]  rules of criminal procedure.
[24:28.840 --> 24:40.840]  And rule three describes what happens and you take your complaint, in a state you take
[24:40.840 --> 24:45.560]  your complaint to a notary public first, right, and get it notarized and then you put it in
[24:45.560 --> 24:46.560]  the lap of somebody.
[24:46.560 --> 24:52.400]  In the Fed, it's a little different, you take your complaint and you go to the federal magistrate
[24:52.400 --> 24:53.400]  judge.
[24:53.400 --> 25:01.480]  They have certain groups of judges that they specifically call federal magistrate judges.
[25:01.480 --> 25:04.400]  And they're going to refuse to see you.
[25:04.400 --> 25:09.680]  They need to, they need to see you, but that's another fight that you can take up in parallel
[25:09.680 --> 25:11.340]  if you want to.
[25:11.340 --> 25:18.320]  But all you have to do, you make an effort to see them, and then when they refuse, rule
[25:18.320 --> 25:26.600]  three says that you can go to any state or local judicial officer, which means you can
[25:26.600 --> 25:28.920]  run down to your local JP after that.
[25:28.920 --> 25:35.680]  You make an attempt to go see, you know, guy number one here, federal magistrate judge.
[25:35.680 --> 25:42.120]  You've got a bunch of roided up federal marshals acting like you don't belong there and you're
[25:42.120 --> 25:44.760]  a scary person so you better leave.
[25:44.760 --> 25:46.760]  And well, do you have an appointment?
[25:46.760 --> 25:47.760]  No.
[25:47.760 --> 25:48.760]  Are you making an appointment right now?
[25:48.760 --> 25:49.760]  No.
[25:49.760 --> 25:52.320]  So they're going to kick you out.
[25:52.320 --> 25:59.800]  And then you just go ahead and go see any state or local judicial officer.
[25:59.800 --> 26:07.280]  So at that point, your criminal complaint is you've lit the fuse.
[26:07.280 --> 26:11.120]  Does that make sense?
[26:11.120 --> 26:17.740]  I sort of, I mean, going to that, I mean, I would go to a federal, now again, this complaint
[26:17.740 --> 26:24.680]  has a lot of the NRS codes, which are Nevada revised statutes listed in there.
[26:24.680 --> 26:30.800]  So I'm not sure it's a, I mean, it eventually is federal because it's first and fourth amendment
[26:30.800 --> 26:33.960]  plus fifth and the rest of them that's in the US.
[26:33.960 --> 26:39.600]  Yeah, that's the ones that you've been saying that your claimings got violated.
[26:39.600 --> 26:50.960]  So Nevada, it was the Nevada offenses that they committed, but it was your federal, federally
[26:50.960 --> 26:53.920]  protected rights that you're saying got violated.
[26:53.920 --> 26:58.360]  If you want to convert that over to all Nevada, then you can deal with it only in Nevada.
[26:58.360 --> 26:59.360]  That's fine too.
[26:59.360 --> 27:04.400]  In which case you need to look at your Nevada rules of criminal procedure or code of criminal
[27:04.400 --> 27:05.400]  procedure.
[27:05.400 --> 27:07.560]  Take a look at what Nevada says and you can do that too.
[27:07.560 --> 27:11.080]  I do have one suggestion for you.
[27:11.080 --> 27:18.600]  It sounded to me like you're going after this little guy and that little guy, the ones who
[27:18.600 --> 27:22.520]  are actually in your face.
[27:22.520 --> 27:32.320]  And you might get more traction if you were to accuse the county judge, accuse the sheriff
[27:32.320 --> 27:39.280]  himself, not that one deputy, then the sheriff is going to try to cover it for the deputy.
[27:39.280 --> 27:50.120]  But you'd go after the sheriff and go after the county judge, go after the county commissioners.
[27:50.120 --> 27:53.080]  They're allowing this crime to go on.
[27:53.080 --> 27:56.560]  They're in charge and they're failing miserably.
[27:56.560 --> 28:02.440]  You've got a chair, sorry, you've got a chair, what?
[28:02.440 --> 28:05.680]  Complaints is against the chair of the county commissioners.
[28:05.680 --> 28:09.440]  Okay, usually that's the county judge, right?
[28:09.440 --> 28:12.200]  No, he's an elected official.
[28:12.200 --> 28:15.000]  Okay, you've got a separate thing.
[28:15.000 --> 28:23.680]  Yeah, so these people, I picture it like if there's a tree that is precarious and it needs
[28:23.680 --> 28:28.520]  to come down, it looks dangerous, this tree is going to hurt somebody, you need to take
[28:28.520 --> 28:29.520]  that tree down.
[28:29.520 --> 28:34.200]  You don't start by flipping the leaves with the nail clipper, you start by taking an ax
[28:34.200 --> 28:36.240]  to the root.
[28:36.240 --> 28:44.360]  And that's how it feels like, I mean, my suggestion, you might consider to look at who's the defendant
[28:44.360 --> 28:48.240]  in these things that you're, it looks like you've got something that's very well thought
[28:48.240 --> 28:53.400]  out and put together, so maybe consider who you're accusing of doing it.
[28:53.400 --> 28:54.400]  Confusing?
[28:54.400 --> 28:59.200]  That's the part that's confusing to me, because after I heard Randy, he started talking about
[28:59.200 --> 29:04.960]  doing this at the level and then you take it to a JOP, he ignores you, so you take it
[29:04.960 --> 29:07.800]  to the district, they ignore you, you take it to the appellate, they ignore you, and
[29:07.800 --> 29:12.640]  then you take it to the Supreme Court and then you can recarge it.
[29:12.640 --> 29:20.680]  So, you know, again, I'm kind of blundering my way through this and that's why I wanted
[29:20.680 --> 29:23.720]  to call in, was to try to get a little clarity.
[29:23.720 --> 29:29.080]  No, you're exactly right, that's exactly what you do.
[29:29.080 --> 29:33.440]  It doesn't exactly matter who's first and who's last, but it makes sense to take the
[29:33.440 --> 29:38.760]  progression and go from the little guy, let's say little, you know, you're not starting
[29:38.760 --> 29:44.120]  from the guy who's in your face, but you're starting from some judge that's relatively
[29:44.120 --> 29:48.120]  local and you're moving up the chain and that kind of makes sense.
[29:48.120 --> 29:52.120]  You don't, let's start out with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State
[29:52.120 --> 29:55.120]  because he hasn't even been made aware of it.
[29:55.120 --> 30:01.560]  Okay, we will continue in just a moment.
[30:01.560 --> 30:05.160]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively
[30:05.160 --> 30:06.160]  affected our health?
[30:06.160 --> 30:10.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how
[30:10.320 --> 30:14.640]  cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:14.640 --> 30:16.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.240 --> 30:20.640]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again and once your privacy
[30:20.640 --> 30:24.640]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:24.640 --> 30:29.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:29.760 --> 30:32.400]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:32.400 --> 30:36.680]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:36.680 --> 30:40.220]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[30:40.220 --> 30:44.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.040 --> 30:46.160]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy.
[30:46.160 --> 30:47.160]  That's a fact.
[30:47.160 --> 30:50.680]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head
[30:50.680 --> 30:51.680]  has been disputed.
[30:51.680 --> 30:56.080]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[30:56.080 --> 31:00.560]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones
[31:00.560 --> 31:01.560]  affect brain chemistry.
[31:01.560 --> 31:07.200]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest
[31:07.200 --> 31:10.880]  to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:10.880 --> 31:14.760]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any
[31:14.760 --> 31:15.760]  chances.
[31:15.760 --> 31:19.200]  I always keep the phone far from my body and I use a corded headset.
[31:19.200 --> 31:21.200]  Look after Catherine Albrecht.
[31:21.200 --> 31:29.520]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:29.520 --> 31:30.520]  I lost my son.
[31:30.520 --> 31:31.520]  My nephew.
[31:31.520 --> 31:32.520]  My uncle.
[31:32.520 --> 31:33.520]  My son.
[31:33.520 --> 31:34.520]  On September 11, 2001.
[31:34.520 --> 31:37.800]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:37.800 --> 31:41.920]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:41.920 --> 31:47.760]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects
[31:47.760 --> 31:51.520]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[31:51.520 --> 31:53.000]  Bring justice to my son.
[31:53.000 --> 31:54.000]  My uncle.
[31:54.000 --> 31:55.000]  My nephew.
[31:55.000 --> 31:56.000]  My son.
[31:56.000 --> 31:57.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[31:57.000 --> 32:00.720]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:00.720 --> 32:05.120]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[32:05.120 --> 32:06.120]  Word?
[32:06.120 --> 32:11.240]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[32:11.240 --> 32:17.640]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:17.640 --> 32:22.160]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
[32:22.160 --> 32:24.600]  dividing the word of truth.
[32:24.600 --> 32:28.560]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse
[32:28.560 --> 32:31.880]  by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[32:31.880 --> 32:36.520]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[32:36.520 --> 32:38.880]  and Christian character development.
[32:38.880 --> 32:43.400]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:43.400 --> 32:47.800]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[32:47.800 --> 32:49.400]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:49.400 --> 32:56.640]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[32:56.640 --> 32:59.080]  motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[32:59.080 --> 33:09.080]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:29.080 --> 33:41.480]  Okay, we are back with the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Felton, I'm Brett Fountain, and we are
[33:41.480 --> 33:43.680]  talking with Nicholas in Nevada.
[33:43.680 --> 33:51.200]  Nicholas, when we went out to our sponsors, you were saying that you are not quite sure
[33:51.200 --> 33:54.080]  you understand the routine, but you described it pretty well.
[33:54.080 --> 33:58.120]  You invited out there exactly like if you did understand it.
[33:58.120 --> 34:01.760]  But part of it is not quite clicking with you.
[34:01.760 --> 34:10.040]  Okay, so my next step is to take all five of these, which I have notarized, and I'm
[34:10.040 --> 34:13.240]  going to take them to adjust those fees here.
[34:13.240 --> 34:18.880]  I've already found one of the judges that I want to take them to, and so I submit them.
[34:18.880 --> 34:22.240]  I don't think there's any fees that are associated with that.
[34:22.240 --> 34:24.280]  I file them with them.
[34:24.280 --> 34:25.280]  And then...
[34:25.280 --> 34:26.280]  You're correct.
[34:26.280 --> 34:27.280]  No fees.
[34:27.280 --> 34:35.080]  So, how long do they have to, you know, Randy thinks that they're, well, his experience
[34:35.080 --> 34:39.200]  typically has been, they're not going to do anything with it, so I file it with them.
[34:39.200 --> 34:45.760]  How do I keep a paper trail that I filed it with them, and how long do they have to act
[34:45.760 --> 34:50.760]  on it before I come to the conclusion they're not going to act and I take it to the next
[34:50.760 --> 34:51.760]  level?
[34:51.760 --> 34:56.280]  Okay, yeah, good question.
[34:56.280 --> 35:04.920]  So that will be specific to, both of those questions are specific to your rules, and
[35:04.920 --> 35:09.400]  it'll be local to, if you're doing this in Nevada, then you have to look at the Nevada
[35:09.400 --> 35:14.760]  criminal procedure and see where is this duty imposed on that magistrate.
[35:14.760 --> 35:20.600]  Or if you're taking it to a grand jury, which I like to do, I guess we don't talk about
[35:20.600 --> 35:23.600]  that a whole lot, but I like to take these to a grand jury.
[35:23.600 --> 35:29.080]  The grand jury has a duty, just like a magistrate does, to act on the criminal complaint and
[35:29.080 --> 35:31.520]  inquire into the matter.
[35:31.520 --> 35:36.640]  And so, if they true bill it, then that means they're going to go ahead and commence a case.
[35:36.640 --> 35:41.640]  And if they no bill, that means they looked at your paperwork, they don't think that
[35:41.640 --> 35:42.640]  it's a crime.
[35:42.640 --> 35:45.920]  Even if it's true, it's not a crime.
[35:45.920 --> 35:53.280]  So the matter of whether or not it's true is something to figure out in court, but is
[35:53.280 --> 35:57.320]  it an issue that needs to be heard by a court if it were true, that's something they're
[35:57.320 --> 36:00.080]  trying to figure out up front.
[36:00.080 --> 36:03.360]  And so, how many days do they have?
[36:03.360 --> 36:07.240]  It's probably easier to tell that with the grand jury, well, at least in Texas, we don't
[36:07.240 --> 36:08.240]  have a number of days.
[36:08.240 --> 36:14.520]  In Texas, you just pretty much guess, you say, hey, I kind of expected to hear from
[36:14.520 --> 36:19.720]  him by now, I haven't seen anything, I haven't heard anything.
[36:19.720 --> 36:24.800]  So then I go talk to the clerk of the court where he would have commenced a case.
[36:24.800 --> 36:31.360]  If it's a district thing for a felony or if it's a county issue, if it's maybe not
[36:31.360 --> 36:36.000]  quite a felony, go to the county clerk or the district clerk and say, hey, I'd like
[36:36.000 --> 36:41.480]  to see the 17.31 order that came from judge, what, he didn't, what, what order, what are
[36:41.480 --> 36:42.480]  you talking about?
[36:42.480 --> 36:45.840]  Because they never have any of those.
[36:45.840 --> 36:50.240]  But you asked, they said they don't know what it is, never had it, don't have it,
[36:50.240 --> 36:51.240]  whatever.
[36:51.240 --> 36:58.080]  And now you've got your reasons to believe and you do believe that that judge is a criminal.
[36:58.080 --> 37:02.160]  So you write up the next criminal complaint and hand it to another judge, a different
[37:02.160 --> 37:03.160]  magistrate.
[37:03.160 --> 37:07.880]  And typically like what Reggie is describing, you're going up the chain.
[37:07.880 --> 37:12.600]  I don't always go up the chain.
[37:12.600 --> 37:21.680]  Sometimes it's more politically, you can make more of a mess for them by getting some little
[37:21.680 --> 37:32.960]  guy in a little town who's, he's in the same county so he can hear the issues, but he,
[37:32.960 --> 37:39.600]  maybe somebody that was his running, he was running for the same position as judge.
[37:39.600 --> 37:44.200]  And now the judge that you're holding accountable was his opponent, right?
[37:44.200 --> 37:54.000]  And so it just depends, you can stir up some, it depends on whether you're really trying
[37:54.000 --> 38:00.640]  to hold everybody accountable or whether you really want these things to be somebody to
[38:00.640 --> 38:01.640]  act on them.
[38:01.640 --> 38:04.520]  I guess there's two different purposes there, right?
[38:04.520 --> 38:08.560]  Not necessarily the same pattern.
[38:08.560 --> 38:11.160]  But so there, yeah, that's, that's what I would do.
[38:11.160 --> 38:14.520]  Look at your local rules and see if it specifies days.
[38:14.520 --> 38:20.280]  If it doesn't look at what the duty that's imposed on him, look at what it says he's
[38:20.280 --> 38:21.280]  going to do.
[38:21.280 --> 38:22.920]  If he does his job, what is it?
[38:22.920 --> 38:27.840]  Oh, he has to fold up this document, put it in an envelope and give it to the clerk.
[38:27.840 --> 38:28.840]  Okay, great.
[38:28.840 --> 38:30.840]  So you go ask the clerk for that document.
[38:30.840 --> 38:31.840]  I want to see it.
[38:31.840 --> 38:33.840]  Well, he never gave it to me.
[38:33.840 --> 38:34.840]  Boom.
[38:34.840 --> 38:35.840]  Okay.
[38:35.840 --> 38:40.120]  So that's your question.
[38:40.120 --> 38:52.480]  Yeah, I guess, I mean, obviously, I've got a lot more research to do on finding what
[38:52.480 --> 39:00.360]  the requirements of the JOP is once I file this with them.
[39:00.360 --> 39:08.120]  But ultimately, according to the laws that I've seen, I present this to just for the
[39:08.120 --> 39:09.120]  peace.
[39:09.120 --> 39:18.800]  He can issue a warrant for the arrest of all, either of these people for not doing their
[39:18.800 --> 39:23.920]  job, which is what he should do because I presented to him a very clear case.
[39:23.920 --> 39:24.920]  I have it videoed.
[39:24.920 --> 39:34.640]  He can review the video and I'll have one affidavit that I'll have filled out by someone
[39:34.640 --> 39:38.840]  who also took the video, one of the other people taking the video as I was videoing
[39:38.840 --> 39:39.840]  it as well.
[39:39.840 --> 39:40.840]  So they saw...
[39:40.840 --> 39:46.080]  You're most likely not going to get an opportunity to show your video.
[39:46.080 --> 39:54.360]  This is not in a court case and it's possible that you could get a JP to look at your video,
[39:54.360 --> 39:57.800]  but I would say not very likely.
[39:57.800 --> 40:01.120]  I have a link in the complaint directly to the video.
[40:01.120 --> 40:05.640]  So if there's any question he has about whether it's happened or not, he can go over to the
[40:05.640 --> 40:07.880]  video if in the complaint.
[40:07.880 --> 40:10.320]  Well, that's handy.
[40:10.320 --> 40:13.200]  It might not be admissible.
[40:13.200 --> 40:15.560]  They might not accept it as evidence.
[40:15.560 --> 40:20.360]  However, justices of the peace are a lot more informal.
[40:20.360 --> 40:32.000]  So sometimes they will bend the regulations of formality and they have a little more flexibility
[40:32.000 --> 40:33.000]  to do that.
[40:33.000 --> 40:35.440]  Just say, let's just cut the crap.
[40:35.440 --> 40:36.440]  Let me see the video.
[40:36.440 --> 40:38.800]  Yeah, that's pretty obvious.
[40:38.800 --> 40:50.440]  Whereas a district judge is a lot more bound to follow...
[40:50.440 --> 40:54.520]  There are all these rules of evidence that you have to make sure that what you're bringing
[40:54.520 --> 41:00.360]  to the court, like some video, you've done certain things, you've kept a chain of custody,
[41:00.360 --> 41:04.360]  whatever, and you have to follow those rules of evidence or else they're going to say it's
[41:04.360 --> 41:08.120]  inadmissible and you don't have any evidence.
[41:08.120 --> 41:11.200]  Just your word against his and then what?
[41:11.200 --> 41:17.640]  So justices of the peace, by definition, get to be more informal.
[41:17.640 --> 41:20.920]  So that might help.
[41:20.920 --> 41:22.360]  All right.
[41:22.360 --> 41:24.480]  Well, next week we'll find out.
[41:24.480 --> 41:31.040]  I'll report on Thursday or Friday next week about how that goes and I just need to find
[41:31.040 --> 41:38.040]  out how many days they have to act on this and then proceed from there.
[41:38.040 --> 41:39.040]  Great.
[41:39.040 --> 41:44.480]  Good job pulling all that together because you've got all those statutes ready to go.
[41:44.480 --> 41:46.280]  That you have to build your case.
[41:46.280 --> 41:52.000]  And so I am very particular about getting witnesses and making sure that I build the
[41:52.000 --> 41:59.440]  case so that when it comes to presenting it, someone says, well, you know, they didn't
[41:59.440 --> 42:04.080]  violate this law and here's what he said, that's a direct violation of that law.
[42:04.080 --> 42:06.720]  Here's what he did, that's a direct violation of that law.
[42:06.720 --> 42:13.800]  So if you are, if you were reporting crime, you're probably not going to be the one presenting
[42:13.800 --> 42:14.800]  this.
[42:14.800 --> 42:22.640]  It'll be available for the accuser, which will be technically the state, the people,
[42:22.640 --> 42:26.760]  and then some prosecutor will be the one that's talking about this to the grand jury.
[42:26.760 --> 42:32.560]  Grand jury may or may not call you in and the prosecutor may or may not call you, subpoena
[42:32.560 --> 42:36.640]  you to come to the witness stand on trial.
[42:36.640 --> 42:45.000]  But if you sue them civilly, like you turn this into a federal, for example, that title
[42:45.000 --> 42:55.040]  42, US code 1983, that is to get state actors in trouble for violating your federally protected
[42:55.040 --> 42:56.040]  rights.
[42:56.040 --> 43:01.240]  And in that case, you're reporting crime and you're looking for damages because it's a
[43:01.240 --> 43:02.240]  civil case.
[43:02.240 --> 43:06.840]  It's like a civil shell that its elements are crime.
[43:06.840 --> 43:12.600]  So you're kind of hitting two birds with one stone if you do it that way.
[43:12.600 --> 43:19.640]  I'm not sure because you have to show damages and I'm not yet, have not yet figured out
[43:19.640 --> 43:23.000]  how to prove damages in those cases yet.
[43:23.000 --> 43:28.680]  Otherwise, I mean, I would be glad to go do that, but I'm not going to prove damages yet.
[43:28.680 --> 43:32.280]  Yeah, I would say just start small.
[43:32.280 --> 43:38.480]  You're not going to hurt anything by going ahead and filing criminal complaints and getting
[43:38.480 --> 43:40.200]  people held accountable for that.
[43:40.200 --> 43:42.560]  Is there anything else we have for the other side?
[43:42.560 --> 43:43.560]  No, no.
[43:43.560 --> 43:46.560]  I appreciate your input.
[43:46.560 --> 43:47.560]  Thank you so much.
[43:47.560 --> 43:48.560]  All right.
[43:48.560 --> 43:49.560]  Well, thanks for calling.
[43:49.560 --> 43:50.560]  All right.
[43:50.560 --> 43:51.560]  Now we're going to go to our sponsors.
[43:51.560 --> 43:57.000]  I see you, E.J. and we have a first time caller and we've got Chris in Colorado.
[43:57.000 --> 43:58.000]  We'll be right back.
[43:58.000 --> 44:05.560]  Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[44:05.560 --> 44:10.320]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[44:10.320 --> 44:16.040]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:16.040 --> 44:22.320]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[44:22.320 --> 44:24.600]  provide the nutrients you need.
[44:24.600 --> 44:29.680]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[44:29.680 --> 44:30.680]  we reject.
[44:30.680 --> 44:35.800]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[44:35.800 --> 44:38.640]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:38.640 --> 44:45.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[44:45.000 --> 44:46.000]  quality radio.
[44:46.000 --> 44:50.560]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:50.560 --> 44:56.160]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[44:56.160 --> 44:57.160]  increase your income.
[44:57.160 --> 44:58.160]  Order now.
[44:58.160 --> 45:03.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:03.160 --> 45:10.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:10.000 --> 45:13.920]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:13.920 --> 45:17.760]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:17.760 --> 45:22.040]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.040 --> 45:26.760]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[45:26.760 --> 45:33.640]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:33.640 --> 45:38.280]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[45:38.280 --> 45:42.480]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:42.480 --> 45:48.680]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:48.680 --> 45:51.200]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:51.200 --> 46:19.680]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[47:21.200 --> 47:30.120]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[47:30.120 --> 47:35.300]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[47:35.300 --> 47:36.640]  can really help.
[47:36.640 --> 47:41.080]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[47:41.080 --> 47:42.080]  today.
[47:42.080 --> 47:46.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[47:46.000 --> 47:49.100]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[47:49.100 --> 47:54.360]  The free books are a three volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[47:54.360 --> 47:58.640]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan
[47:58.640 --> 48:03.560]  of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[48:03.560 --> 48:08.560]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[48:08.560 --> 48:21.320]  Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit
[48:21.320 --> 48:37.920]  us online at bfa.org.
[48:37.920 --> 48:57.480]  The
[48:57.480 --> 49:02.040]  back again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to
[49:02.040 --> 49:06.560]  vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your
[49:06.560 --> 49:11.760]  information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service
[49:11.760 --> 49:15.680]  announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine
[49:15.680 --> 49:21.320]  alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[49:21.320 --> 49:25.640]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers
[49:25.640 --> 49:29.520]  and find a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm
[49:29.520 --> 49:33.160]  sleeping here tonight. That shocking image of a third party in my parents'
[49:33.160 --> 49:37.240]  bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. It protects us
[49:37.240 --> 49:40.960]  from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the
[49:40.960 --> 49:45.840]  days of our founding fathers. Third party, Third Amendment, get it? So if you answer
[49:45.840 --> 49:49.480]  a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust
[49:49.480 --> 49:53.560]  off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. I'm Dr.
[49:53.560 --> 49:59.000]  Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[50:06.760 --> 50:11.440]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. They
[50:11.440 --> 50:14.880]  guarantee it a specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our
[50:14.880 --> 50:18.680]  liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an
[50:18.680 --> 50:23.520]  unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. Privacy is
[50:23.520 --> 50:27.520]  under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[50:27.520 --> 50:31.960]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to
[50:31.960 --> 50:36.480]  vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your
[50:36.480 --> 50:41.640]  information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service
[50:41.640 --> 50:45.560]  announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine
[50:45.560 --> 50:52.760]  alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. Imagine four
[50:52.760 --> 50:56.840]  eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray
[50:56.840 --> 51:01.040]  goggles. That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans
[51:01.040 --> 51:04.960]  freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. Fourth Amendment? Four eyes
[51:04.960 --> 51:09.040]  staring at you? Get it? Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth
[51:09.040 --> 51:14.040]  Amendment rights in the name of security. Case in point, TSA airport scanners that
[51:14.040 --> 51:18.080]  peer under your clothing. When government employees demand a peep at your privates
[51:18.080 --> 51:22.160]  without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[51:22.160 --> 51:26.240]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use
[51:26.240 --> 51:30.760]  their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[51:30.760 --> 51:54.520]  Find out more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[52:00.760 --> 52:10.920]  Okay, we are back. Rule of Law Radio. Randy Kelton's. I'm Brett Fountain, and
[52:10.920 --> 52:20.520]  this is Friday, the 3rd of June, 2022. And I am seeing some indications that we had
[52:20.520 --> 52:25.720]  dead air this last segment. Not sure why. Looks like we had some weirdness going on
[52:25.720 --> 52:30.880]  with the caller board too. Don't know what's up with that. Hopefully you guys
[52:30.880 --> 52:38.400]  are hearing me. Call in 512-646-1984. We're going to go ahead and try once more
[52:38.400 --> 52:50.120]  to go to EJ in California. Hello, EJ. Hi, Brett. Wonderful. Glad to hear you this
[52:50.120 --> 53:00.560]  time. Yes, there was some dead air, but I hung on. I'm glad you did. I was just
[53:00.560 --> 53:07.400]  there telling all of my $20 words. Oh well. Okay, what's on your mind this
[53:07.400 --> 53:17.960]  evening? Okay, so still plugging in along with the case against the hospital and
[53:17.960 --> 53:26.120]  the status conference was coming up, the first hearing on Monday. And I missed the
[53:26.120 --> 53:33.400]  there's a statement that we're supposed to fill out, and I totally missed it. It's
[53:33.400 --> 53:40.120]  called a meet and confer statement. And I don't know if Texas has the meet and
[53:40.120 --> 53:47.360]  confer in a civil suit, but we were supposed to meet and confer 30 days
[53:47.360 --> 53:55.080]  prior to the hearing. Didn't do it because all the discoveries that they
[53:55.080 --> 54:02.880]  sent me, they send it to a wrong email. And also the, you know, the
[54:02.880 --> 54:11.800]  interrogatories that there were sent. The proof of service was, what was the word?
[54:11.800 --> 54:18.320]  The proof of service is wrong. Insufficient. Okay, yeah. Insufficient service
[54:18.320 --> 54:27.000]  of process. Insufficient service of process. I've already mailed them my, you
[54:27.000 --> 54:31.080]  know, statement saying that this is insufficient, as well as trying to get the
[54:31.080 --> 54:38.400]  police record. They sent it to a wrong address, you know, just- Police record?
[54:38.400 --> 54:48.600]  Yeah. How's the police involved? Well, they, the police came to the hospital and
[54:48.600 --> 54:56.600]  made a false report. And there were surveillance footage that captured
[54:56.600 --> 55:03.600]  what happened in the lobby, the era lobby. And I tried- I know, but I'm saying about the
[55:03.600 --> 55:11.840]  service of this meet and confer, how does that involve the police? Yeah, that is
[55:11.840 --> 55:16.160]  true. Well, it's just part of the records because the meet and confer is
[55:16.160 --> 55:27.640]  just meeting together to see what kind of discovery both parties will agree to
[55:27.640 --> 55:39.280]  do. It says right here, pursuant to rule 315, we would have to meet and confer
[55:39.280 --> 55:49.320]  regarding the following discovery. And it asks to have a tentative schedule of
[55:49.320 --> 55:56.760]  discovery. And I put parties have not been able to agree on a meet and confer
[55:56.760 --> 56:06.480]  date and time. Plaintiff letters attached and plaintiffs request continuing the
[56:06.480 --> 56:10.400]  case management conference. I just requested it because give me another
[56:10.400 --> 56:18.600]  day, 30 days, because it's mandatory. It says the party must, must- Yeah, there's
[56:18.600 --> 56:25.120]  nothing wrong with that. Okay. Yeah, when somebody does something
[56:25.120 --> 56:30.680]  sly and sneaky and sends it to the opposing party, serves it, I have to just
[56:30.680 --> 56:35.040]  imagine that they know what they're doing and they didn't want to go well.
[56:35.040 --> 56:38.520]  They didn't want me to have service, but they wanted it to look like they were
[56:38.520 --> 56:45.400]  serving something. And you know, I see that and whatever. Dirty trick. I will put
[56:45.400 --> 56:51.720]  in the judicial notice and just say, I did not get service. We are setting it up
[56:51.720 --> 56:57.240]  now. And that's just something to put it, just so there's something that got file
[56:57.240 --> 57:00.720]  stamped and that's in the record, shows good faith. You know, you didn't do
[57:00.720 --> 57:07.400]  anything wrong. You're not trying to hold them accountable, unless you are. You're
[57:07.400 --> 57:11.640]  trying to just move forward with the case and that just shows good faith.
[57:11.640 --> 57:15.840]  It puts a document in there that has a date on it and so forth. So it sounds
[57:15.840 --> 57:21.480]  like you're, yeah, right on track with all that. Okay, wonderful. I just
[57:21.480 --> 57:27.480]  submitted the meet and confer statement, even though it's late. So it isn't the
[57:27.480 --> 57:34.720]  record, so it's filed. Just saying that parties haven't been able to agree and
[57:34.720 --> 57:40.600]  just filed. Well, did you also clearly say that they served an incorrect
[57:40.600 --> 57:47.400]  destination or recipient address or something like that? Yeah, I attached my
[57:47.400 --> 57:54.880]  letters to the meet and confer statement, two letters from them. Okay. And you know,
[57:54.880 --> 57:59.960]  the judge appreciates if you don't demonstrate in those kinds of things, if
[57:59.960 --> 58:05.160]  you don't talk bad about the lawyers, if you don't say, why that's sneaky, rotten,
[58:05.160 --> 58:13.240]  no good, even though probably they are. You say, evidently opposing counsel was
[58:13.240 --> 58:21.960]  mistaken as to my address. You know, just put it out there like this and the judge
[58:21.960 --> 58:33.080]  will smirk. He knows exactly what happened. That sly dog. So I would, you know, I am
[58:33.080 --> 58:41.720]  going in person to the conference, the status conference, the first hearing. So I
[58:41.720 --> 58:47.440]  just wanted to give you a heads up. The clerks will lie because I called them and
[58:47.440 --> 58:51.640]  I said, hey, I want to come in person. They're like, you can't come in person.
[58:51.640 --> 59:01.360]  Everything is via, you know, what is it, via Zoom. And I'm like, he's lying to me.
[59:01.360 --> 59:08.600]  It's over the phone because I courted one day. Yeah. And I knocked on the door and
[59:08.600 --> 59:13.560]  she said, no, you have to give us five days notice. If you're going to be in
[59:13.560 --> 59:21.200]  person, I go. So then I knew, I'm like, oh, you know, that's good to know. And
[59:21.200 --> 59:26.320]  this week I called just to see what they would say to me. And he lied to me. He
[59:26.320 --> 59:31.760]  said, we don't hold in-person meetings. And I filed it. And I called him today. I
[59:31.760 --> 59:36.280]  said, did you get my notice? And he said, yes, we'll see you in person on Monday.
[59:36.280 --> 59:45.680]  They lie. So whatever they say, don't trust them. Do what you got to do. That's my
[59:45.680 --> 59:55.240]  deal. Yeah. Gosh, you know, the state court system, it's really, it's in disarray.
[59:55.240 --> 01:00:01.840]  I mean, just people just lying to you over the phone. You know, I reported him.
[01:00:01.840 --> 01:00:07.840]  I have a tape, but it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter, but it'll push. Well,
[01:00:07.840 --> 01:00:12.880]  you know, yeah, they are so prolific with their wrongdoing that if you have the
[01:00:12.880 --> 01:00:17.160]  bandwidth for it, you can hold them all accountable. But at some point they're
[01:00:17.160 --> 01:00:23.520]  so, they just come up with so many different ways to break the law and deny
[01:00:23.520 --> 01:00:26.840]  you and your rights that you just have to pick your battles. You have to decide
[01:00:26.840 --> 01:00:32.400]  which ones am I going to, you know, give up my time with my kids and give up the
[01:00:32.400 --> 01:00:37.920]  time. I need to go to the grocery store at some point here. And you have to draw
[01:00:37.920 --> 01:00:42.320]  the line and say, I'm going to hold this person accountable for that. And I'm
[01:00:42.320 --> 01:00:48.160]  just going to let this other issue right here, just let it go. Or maybe you get
[01:00:48.160 --> 01:00:53.160]  really good at being quick to bar grieve and quick to file a criminal complaint,
[01:00:53.160 --> 01:00:57.560]  but you don't pursue it after that. You have to draw the line for yourself on
[01:00:58.120 --> 01:01:03.040]  how much you're going to put into it. Because they are, they are prolific. They
[01:01:03.040 --> 01:01:04.760]  will keep you busy.
[01:01:07.320 --> 01:01:14.040]  Oh, yeah. It's just, it's nonstop. It really is. They know that you probably
[01:01:14.040 --> 01:01:22.840]  don't know the rules back to back. So they'll test you and see. And I put the
[01:01:22.840 --> 01:01:28.560]  notice in and called and spoke to the same, same guy, Enrique. And I do have
[01:01:28.600 --> 01:01:36.240]  the zoom link. So I'm going to post it. I'm going to be there in person. So
[01:01:36.240 --> 01:01:42.640]  hopefully some people will be able to. Yeah, Pacific 9 130. So I did.
[01:01:42.640 --> 01:01:46.280]  Yeah, great. Yeah, post the link and you'll have some court watchers to join
[01:01:46.280 --> 01:01:46.880]  in with you.
[01:01:46.880 --> 01:01:54.000]  Yeah, that would be great. And also, guess what, Brett? Remember, I had a
[01:01:54.000 --> 01:02:00.200]  traffic citation last year towards the end of the year. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Separate
[01:02:00.200 --> 01:02:06.720]  issue. Yes. Separate issue. Guess what? I get a letter in the mail from the DA
[01:02:06.760 --> 01:02:11.360]  saying that they're prosecuting the misdemeanor for not showing my ID
[01:02:11.360 --> 01:02:18.880]  refusal or something like that. So now I have another court. But there's no
[01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:25.360]  probable cause because those two tickets, like making a right that that's just
[01:02:25.360 --> 01:02:29.160]  like one poof. So how could they even I guess they're like, well, we can get her
[01:02:29.160 --> 01:02:32.920]  on this. So let's put her on the, you know,
[01:02:33.680 --> 01:02:37.280]  Okay, so they had multiple charges on there and they dropped some of them, but
[01:02:37.280 --> 01:02:43.000]  they kept one. Is that what I'm hearing? Okay. Well, go down there. If you didn't
[01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:47.240]  already go get a certified copy, go talk to the court clerk and say, Hey, I'd
[01:02:47.240 --> 01:02:54.680]  like to inspect the record. Inspecting is free. And it's right now. So they're
[01:02:54.680 --> 01:02:57.680]  not going to wait two weeks or whatever is their time frame. They're just going
[01:02:57.680 --> 01:03:01.440]  to pull out the folder. You might have to wait a minute while they go reach and
[01:03:01.440 --> 01:03:08.000]  get it. But you're not really waiting weeks, even days. You'll just you're
[01:03:08.000 --> 01:03:12.440]  standing at the counter. I'm here now. I want to inspect it. So they will go and
[01:03:12.960 --> 01:03:16.360]  pull it for you and flop it on the counter. You can flip through it. You
[01:03:16.360 --> 01:03:21.600]  take pictures with your phone if you want. And then while you're standing
[01:03:21.600 --> 01:03:25.960]  there looking at it is the time to ask for a copy. You want to take a copy home.
[01:03:25.960 --> 01:03:31.600]  They are expecting kind of a different path. They're expecting you to email
[01:03:31.600 --> 01:03:37.520]  them or write to them. And then they're going to sit on it for a couple of weeks
[01:03:37.520 --> 01:03:41.320]  and do nothing. Well, now they have no excuse because you're standing there in
[01:03:41.320 --> 01:03:45.480]  front of them and the documents are right here. So they can't tell you it's
[01:03:45.480 --> 01:03:50.520]  going to take two weeks for me to get to the Xerox machine in back. See?
[01:03:50.520 --> 01:03:56.280]  Oh, yeah. I can certify copy just like that. That's the problem because I've done that.
[01:03:56.280 --> 01:04:02.240]  But to certify copy, they charge you $45, which is a lot of money. $45.
[01:04:02.240 --> 01:04:10.480]  $45 here. Yeah. That's a California thing. That's a California thing. Yeah.
[01:04:10.480 --> 01:04:15.160]  I hate to ask how much it costs for you to get a Coca-Cola.
[01:04:15.160 --> 01:04:22.680]  Because if I put an Informa Popper sheet in there, that means that I already gave them
[01:04:22.680 --> 01:04:30.080]  jurisdiction. So I can't do that for this. That's what I heard. Like if I file that I'm
[01:04:30.080 --> 01:04:39.040]  an Informa Popper and I put it in the case file, that means automatically that I gave
[01:04:39.040 --> 01:04:45.960]  them my jurisdiction. Because I'm not sure about that.
[01:04:45.960 --> 01:04:53.200]  Really? I'm not sure. That would be... They're kind of two separate issues there. One is,
[01:04:53.200 --> 01:04:58.080]  are you going to be able to pay for the court costs? And one is, does this court even have
[01:04:58.080 --> 01:05:03.200]  jurisdiction to preside over this matter at all? Has this matter been properly brought
[01:05:03.200 --> 01:05:10.600]  to the court? Have I been brought into, either via in Persom, in Rim, somehow they have to
[01:05:10.600 --> 01:05:15.720]  say that there's a nexus and a reason for them to hear this case. But it's you who's
[01:05:15.720 --> 01:05:20.520]  responsible to stand and answer. So I think it's two separate issues. I mean, if you saw
[01:05:20.520 --> 01:05:26.120]  something in your local rules, go by that. But I think that's going to be separate. We
[01:05:26.120 --> 01:05:31.120]  will be right. You're going to be right. You're going to be right. You're going to be right.
[01:05:31.120 --> 01:05:35.960]  It's going to be separate. We will be right back.
[01:05:35.960 --> 01:05:40.680]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:05:40.680 --> 01:05:45.840]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won
[01:05:45.840 --> 01:05:50.960]  six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step by
[01:05:50.960 --> 01:05:55.600]  step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights
[01:05:55.600 --> 01:06:01.120]  statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters
[01:06:01.120 --> 01:06:05.320]  and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:06:05.320 --> 01:06:11.040]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears proven method
[01:06:11.040 --> 01:06:16.560]  is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:06:16.560 --> 01:06:22.320]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:06:22.320 --> 01:06:32.880]  or email michaelmears.yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:06:32.880 --> 01:06:38.360]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love logos. Without the shows on this network,
[01:06:38.360 --> 01:06:42.320]  I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's
[01:06:42.320 --> 01:06:47.560]  no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help
[01:06:47.560 --> 01:06:51.120]  keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit
[01:06:51.120 --> 01:06:56.120]  of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:06:56.120 --> 01:07:01.720]  How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you
[01:07:01.720 --> 01:07:06.080]  can help logos. When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is
[01:07:06.080 --> 01:07:13.280]  clear your cookies. Now, go to logosradio.network.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:07:13.280 --> 01:07:19.200]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:07:19.200 --> 01:07:24.320]  Do I pay extra? No. Do I have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon
[01:07:24.320 --> 01:07:30.120]  Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This
[01:07:30.120 --> 01:07:53.480]  is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. Happy Holidays, Logos. This is the Logos Radio
[01:07:53.480 --> 01:08:08.480]  Show. Okay. We are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain
[01:08:08.480 --> 01:08:16.480]  and this is the 3rd of June, 2022. Right now we're talking with EJ in California. So let's
[01:08:16.480 --> 01:08:22.720]  see EJ. There you go. When we went out to the sponsors, you were just talking about
[01:08:22.720 --> 01:08:33.000]  the possibility that if you were to say that you have, if you're informal paupers, then
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:39.840]  you felt like maybe that was going to automatically give them jurisdiction to hear the matter.
[01:08:39.840 --> 01:08:44.720]  And I'm not sure about that. You might look into that because I think it will be separate.
[01:08:44.720 --> 01:08:54.720]  A second question regarding the failure, like something like resist, not resisting, but
[01:08:54.720 --> 01:09:03.880]  not giving the license to the peace officer. I was going to mail a informal discovery request
[01:09:03.880 --> 01:09:11.240]  to the DA in California. They have an informal discovery and there's some samples online.
[01:09:11.240 --> 01:09:20.880]  And the first question is, can you send me the back copy of the ticket? And I don't understand
[01:09:20.880 --> 01:09:26.800]  that. I don't understand that. Why would someone ask for a back copy of the ticket?
[01:09:26.800 --> 01:09:37.560]  Yeah, that doesn't make sense to me either. But it's everywhere in Sacramento. So I'm
[01:09:37.560 --> 01:09:46.640]  going to use the informal discovery request. Maybe this is just traffic, but it was traffic,
[01:09:46.640 --> 01:09:52.720]  but now it's a misdemeanor. I got to make sure that, see right here, a copy of the reverse
[01:09:52.720 --> 01:10:03.440]  of the citing officer's copy of the above reference notice to appear and a copy of records
[01:10:03.440 --> 01:10:13.680]  regarding them. So I'm just asking, can I, for the informal discovery request, I think
[01:10:13.680 --> 01:10:18.760]  this is just for traffic though. I didn't read the rules. I may just have to do the
[01:10:18.760 --> 01:10:27.520]  discovery request. Instead of just doing the discovery request, I need to put in a motion
[01:10:27.520 --> 01:10:37.560]  to dismiss, and then improper venue, because they're not a court of record. And also-
[01:10:37.560 --> 01:10:41.400]  Oh yeah. You don't have those in there already. Start with the jurisdiction, the challenge
[01:10:41.400 --> 01:10:44.840]  jurisdiction. That should always be the first thing you file.
[01:10:44.840 --> 01:10:48.920]  Okay. Okay. So-
[01:10:48.920 --> 01:10:55.160]  I follow that up with an objection to an improper venue. I follow that up right at the same
[01:10:55.160 --> 01:11:01.040]  time with the jurisdiction and a motion to dismiss based on that. So-
[01:11:01.040 --> 01:11:06.720]  All three together. Venue is dependent on, yes. Venue is completely
[01:11:06.720 --> 01:11:12.540]  dependent on jurisdiction. So if they don't have jurisdiction, there's no proper venue.
[01:11:12.540 --> 01:11:16.720]  Every venue is improper. I see.
[01:11:16.720 --> 01:11:23.800]  So I put those three together. If you have improper venue or if you have a lack of jurisdiction,
[01:11:23.800 --> 01:11:27.960]  those rules will want either of those issues to be filed first. Well, in this case, you've
[01:11:27.960 --> 01:11:33.640]  got both issues. So file them all at the same time. And a motion to ask the court to do
[01:11:33.640 --> 01:11:36.880]  something about it. Dismiss.
[01:11:36.880 --> 01:11:48.320]  Okay. Great. For the arraignment date, for the motions to be heard, the date of the arraignment.
[01:11:48.320 --> 01:11:58.200]  And there was a posting of by someone in Florida and it was a really good document. I don't
[01:11:58.200 --> 01:12:09.360]  know if you read it, but it was regarding a notice for judicial- for the judicial- it's
[01:12:09.360 --> 01:12:20.720]  not a complaint, but just to notice to the judges to make sure that they recognize our
[01:12:20.720 --> 01:12:27.120]  constitutional rights and that it shouldn't be- yeah, they shouldn't be violating. So
[01:12:27.120 --> 01:12:34.120]  that I'm going to be filing that as well. Do I have it here? Yeah, someone from Florida
[01:12:34.120 --> 01:12:37.520]  did it and he won his case in Florida.
[01:12:37.520 --> 01:12:45.080]  Yeah. Interesting. Well, is there anything else that's on your mind for this evening?
[01:12:45.080 --> 01:12:52.640]  Okay. For back to the civil case, I have a question- another question. So I have a motion
[01:12:52.640 --> 01:13:00.680]  to stay. Should I bring a motion to stay with me in person and have them- have them file
[01:13:00.680 --> 01:13:04.880]  it while I'm there or should I just file it prior to going?
[01:13:04.880 --> 01:13:15.240]  That's a good question. So some kinds of motions will be mentioned in the rules as needing
[01:13:15.240 --> 01:13:21.560]  to have to give the other party a certain number of days notice. So you might take a
[01:13:21.560 --> 01:13:30.760]  look and see if that's it. Probably not because a motion to stay is you're trying to put a
[01:13:30.760 --> 01:13:37.560]  pause on everything here, pending whatever reasoning that you have in place. So it's
[01:13:37.560 --> 01:13:41.640]  probably not going to be a problem, but you want to take a look at your local rules and
[01:13:41.640 --> 01:13:42.640]  see.
[01:13:42.640 --> 01:13:53.120]  Let's see. Yeah, for that, there aren't any rules like you need to wait for the day. So
[01:13:53.120 --> 01:13:59.200]  I can do it right away. I'm just thinking should I do it before or on that- on the day
[01:13:59.200 --> 01:14:05.880]  of the hearing? I think it's better just to file it before, I believe, but I'll just
[01:14:05.880 --> 01:14:06.880]  have a look.
[01:14:06.880 --> 01:14:11.720]  Yeah, if you don't have any pressing, like really strategic reason that you are not filing
[01:14:11.720 --> 01:14:18.440]  something, go ahead and file it. Now that gives, you know, it's a good faith move. You've
[01:14:18.440 --> 01:14:23.840]  got the- giving the other side plenty of opportunity to oppose the motion if they have some reason
[01:14:23.840 --> 01:14:30.080]  to. You know, they can say, no, if you stay that, then that'll harm my client's right
[01:14:30.080 --> 01:14:38.280]  to whatever, something else, and you have to take that into account. So by giving them
[01:14:38.280 --> 01:14:43.760]  a document that's a surprise, that's generally frowned upon. They can't really beat you up
[01:14:43.760 --> 01:14:52.280]  too much about it, your pro se, but they appreciate when there is notice given. There's advance,
[01:14:52.280 --> 01:14:58.600]  you know, however many days in advance, that's generally seen as a good thing.
[01:14:58.600 --> 01:15:08.120]  I see. Okay. And one more thing before we go. I looked at the Registrative Actions
[01:15:08.120 --> 01:15:19.520]  online and the parties must file a- it's like a statement of the status, what's going on,
[01:15:19.520 --> 01:15:27.240]  and they didn't send me a copy at all of that, and they put jury trial fees attached. You
[01:15:27.240 --> 01:15:34.600]  can see like the jury, that they want to move forward to a jury trial. When they were late
[01:15:34.600 --> 01:15:42.120]  in responding with an answer, it was past the 30 days, and I'm thinking, you know,
[01:15:42.120 --> 01:15:51.240]  are you- is the case winnable just by a technicality like that? I don't know.
[01:15:51.240 --> 01:16:02.040]  I don't know either. Yeah, sorry. I got no experience to draw on to answer that question.
[01:16:02.040 --> 01:16:10.440]  Okay. It's just putting it out there, but I think that putting the jury trial fees,
[01:16:10.440 --> 01:16:18.560]  they're moving towards going to a jury trial, of course. But how can they just go, you know,
[01:16:18.560 --> 01:16:24.200]  marching in without any evidence? No discovery has-
[01:16:24.200 --> 01:16:31.400]  When some lawyer does something that I, in my debt, don't think is right, I am most likely
[01:16:31.400 --> 01:16:39.000]  going to be able to find pretty easily why. They will say on their pursuit to rule this
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:42.680]  or that, you go look and that rule doesn't exactly say that. Or they'll put some case
[01:16:42.680 --> 01:16:48.880]  law in there that appears to bolster their position. And when you go read the case, it's
[01:16:48.880 --> 01:16:57.920]  not talking about that. Or even in some cases, it'll say those phrases, but it's- that's
[01:16:57.920 --> 01:17:02.600]  not the holding of the case. So the whole gist of it is saying the opposite of what
[01:17:02.600 --> 01:17:07.280]  they said. And you just, you can probably beat them up if you go and read what they're
[01:17:07.280 --> 01:17:12.600]  saying because your gut will tell you, hey, that's not right. I wouldn't do that to them.
[01:17:12.600 --> 01:17:18.040]  They're doing this to me. This is not right. Something's not okay here. And in those cases,
[01:17:18.040 --> 01:17:25.880]  you can probably find not only how to rip their document to shreds, but also which rule
[01:17:25.880 --> 01:17:31.280]  to bargain them about. They violated some rule of ethics and you can call them on that.
[01:17:31.280 --> 01:17:37.680]  Wow. Okay. I think that's it. Thank you so much.
[01:17:37.680 --> 01:17:44.840]  Okay. Yeah. Well, thank you for calling, EJ. Good talking with you. Okay. So then next
[01:17:44.840 --> 01:17:52.240]  we have a first time caller that has hung on through the data error that we had apparently.
[01:17:52.240 --> 01:18:01.720]  And this is in the 650 area code. If you can hear me, give a first name and a state.
[01:18:01.720 --> 01:18:08.080]  My name is Wayne Bryce and although this is a California number, I live in the great state
[01:18:08.080 --> 01:18:14.200]  of Texas. Okay. Wayne in Texas. We're just about to go
[01:18:14.200 --> 01:18:22.880]  to our sponsors here for a break, but we'll come back on the other side and we will address
[01:18:22.880 --> 01:18:28.440]  your issues. And we do have another spot on the caller board. And if you want to call
[01:18:28.440 --> 01:18:40.160]  in, it is 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. Sorry, soft drink lovers. Even diet drinks
[01:18:40.160 --> 01:18:45.480]  can make you fat. A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people
[01:18:45.480 --> 01:18:49.800]  who avoid the stuff. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop
[01:18:49.800 --> 01:18:55.480]  on supposedly skinny sodas. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data
[01:18:55.480 --> 01:19:00.400]  about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find
[01:19:00.400 --> 01:19:05.760]  your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[01:19:05.760 --> 01:19:11.460]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service
[01:19:11.460 --> 01:19:16.880]  announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:19:16.880 --> 01:19:23.840]  Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage. Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and
[01:19:23.840 --> 01:19:29.640]  help you lose weight, right? Wrong. Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet
[01:19:29.640 --> 01:19:34.760]  soda drinkers for nearly a decade. They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded
[01:19:34.760 --> 01:19:40.240]  people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all. The study's authors say artificial
[01:19:40.240 --> 01:19:44.480]  sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to
[01:19:44.480 --> 01:19:49.460]  squelch it. Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in
[01:19:49.460 --> 01:19:54.840]  a larger overall calorie intake. So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight and
[01:19:54.840 --> 01:19:59.520]  if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:19:59.520 --> 01:20:06.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:20:06.320 --> 01:20:11.680]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:20:11.680 --> 01:20:17.120]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:20:17.120 --> 01:20:21.040]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their
[01:20:21.040 --> 01:20:25.560]  lives and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:20:25.560 --> 01:20:28.720]  I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force
[01:20:28.720 --> 01:20:33.720]  pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to
[01:20:33.720 --> 01:20:40.240]  RememberBuilding7.org today. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic
[01:20:40.240 --> 01:20:43.960]  seminar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society and if we, the people,
[01:20:43.960 --> 01:20:47.400]  are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our
[01:20:47.400 --> 01:20:51.360]  own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the
[01:20:51.360 --> 01:20:54.760]  right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process
[01:20:54.760 --> 01:20:59.000]  of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:03.280]  and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction
[01:21:03.280 --> 01:21:06.720]  with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:21:06.720 --> 01:21:10.760]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:21:10.760 --> 01:21:15.040]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:21:15.040 --> 01:21:18.360]  ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The
[01:21:18.360 --> 01:21:22.760]  Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009
[01:21:22.760 --> 01:21:26.560]  seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how
[01:21:26.560 --> 01:21:30.440]  to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order
[01:21:30.440 --> 01:21:54.120]  your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:22:00.440 --> 01:22:10.480]  Okay, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain and
[01:22:10.480 --> 01:22:16.960]  we are talking with Wayne in Texas. Wayne, I'm glad you held on. I don't know what happened
[01:22:16.960 --> 01:22:23.120]  during that segment, but I'm glad you held on and we're able to talk with you now. What's
[01:22:23.120 --> 01:22:24.120]  on your mind?
[01:22:24.120 --> 01:22:29.520]  So, Brett, thanks for taking my call. I've got a confession to make. I'm a first time
[01:22:29.520 --> 01:22:31.600]  caller for the second time.
[01:22:31.600 --> 01:22:32.600]  Okay.
[01:22:32.600 --> 01:22:40.600]  Okay. So, thanks for taking the call. So, I had called, I want to say the last week or
[01:22:40.600 --> 01:22:47.040]  the week before and you guys had some technical difficulties and I was on maybe an hour with
[01:22:47.040 --> 01:22:52.800]  you guys until you guys got the lines up. But anyhow, I'm in-
[01:22:52.800 --> 01:22:56.880]  Did you just call from a different number? Because we didn't get that.
[01:22:56.880 --> 01:23:04.000]  Well, the last two digits for my wife's phone, everything is the same except the last two
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:05.000]  digits.
[01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:09.600]  Okay. Once it goes into the system, usually it pops up with a name next time and if it
[01:23:09.600 --> 01:23:16.480]  doesn't, then it says some wireless caller or something and then we know that that's
[01:23:16.480 --> 01:23:21.800]  a first time caller. So, yeah, what's on your mind?
[01:23:21.800 --> 01:23:25.800]  I blame my wife for that, but I know that won't fly because everything is my fault.
[01:23:25.800 --> 01:23:27.720]  So, I'll just move on.
[01:23:27.720 --> 01:23:31.600]  Yeah, don't even try.
[01:23:31.600 --> 01:23:47.480]  So, when it comes to filing suit against the VA, under common law, can I sue a corporation
[01:23:47.480 --> 01:23:54.320]  in a common law court? Is that even possible? Do I have to go under the-
[01:23:54.320 --> 01:23:58.560]  I can't see any way that that makes sense because a fictional entity didn't do anything
[01:23:58.560 --> 01:23:59.560]  to you.
[01:23:59.560 --> 01:24:00.560]  That's right.
[01:24:00.560 --> 01:24:05.680]  It was some man or woman who did something and maybe they did it with the excuse of,
[01:24:05.680 --> 01:24:10.680]  well, that's what my boss wanted me to do, but actually no acronym did anything to you.
[01:24:10.680 --> 01:24:13.320]  It's just a pile of paper.
[01:24:13.320 --> 01:24:24.680]  Because I know when you- because they say, well, you can file a claim under Title VII
[01:24:24.680 --> 01:24:34.960]  of the- what is it? Act of 19 square. Anyhow, I can't remember the exact act right now,
[01:24:34.960 --> 01:24:44.880]  but anyhow, if I file an EEO claim, I have to file against a person who won't be there.
[01:24:44.880 --> 01:24:51.320]  They'll put whoever the secretary of the VA is, and that's who the lawsuit is.
[01:24:51.320 --> 01:24:52.320]  Okay.
[01:24:52.320 --> 01:24:57.640]  And that doesn't sound like something I can win just because I'm not familiar with all
[01:24:57.640 --> 01:24:58.640]  that world.
[01:24:58.640 --> 01:24:59.640]  Well-
[01:24:59.640 --> 01:25:06.880]  So, you're talking about not trying to do common law anymore. You're doing it within
[01:25:06.880 --> 01:25:09.640]  their administrative system, right? You're talking about-
[01:25:09.640 --> 01:25:10.640]  I don't want to be there.
[01:25:10.640 --> 01:25:11.640]  EEO complaint?
[01:25:11.640 --> 01:25:16.960]  Yeah. I don't think that's a good idea. I think it's a sucker's bet. I think it's a-
[01:25:16.960 --> 01:25:24.120]  Well, I think it is. Once you sue in their world, they drag it out for one thing and
[01:25:24.120 --> 01:25:27.880]  you don't- it can be appealed forever.
[01:25:27.880 --> 01:25:28.880]  Right.
[01:25:28.880 --> 01:25:38.320]  If it's a common law court, it's not appealable. They can't appeal it. It's what's done. When
[01:25:38.320 --> 01:25:45.360]  those are drawn, the decision's made, the court is spoken. Right?
[01:25:45.360 --> 01:25:51.440]  If the jury- if you have a bench trial or a jury trial, there's a little bit of difference
[01:25:51.440 --> 01:25:53.160]  there with-
[01:25:53.160 --> 01:25:54.160]  Jury trial.
[01:25:54.160 --> 01:26:00.640]  It can be appealed. Yeah. So, if you do- if you get the jury to say, here's the way it
[01:26:00.640 --> 01:26:06.640]  is, then yeah, that part's done. The only thing that you could really challenge at that
[01:26:06.640 --> 01:26:12.800]  point would be, was there some kind of judicial error? I don't know, maybe in allowing evidence
[01:26:12.800 --> 01:26:21.080]  that should have been inadmissible or something that didn't have to do with the findings of
[01:26:21.080 --> 01:26:22.080]  the jury.
[01:26:22.080 --> 01:26:28.960]  So, I have clear negligence. I mean, it's really, really easy. There was the agreement
[01:26:28.960 --> 01:26:33.840]  that, you know, the whole, hey, will you stick this thing up your nose if we don't give you
[01:26:33.840 --> 01:26:39.000]  the vaccine? I said, sure. You know, first I said, okay, fine. And then it like burned
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:45.120]  like crazy. I'm like, now wait a minute, there's something in this. I think our whole agreement
[01:26:45.120 --> 01:26:50.680]  has just fallen apart here because I wasn't advised to this. I didn't get full disclosure.
[01:26:50.680 --> 01:26:59.320]  So, the decision is null and void. And so, from the standpoint of- I thought it was a
[01:26:59.320 --> 01:27:03.560]  trap. That's what I thought. I thought I can't- because they get this thing and once I try
[01:27:03.560 --> 01:27:15.800]  it in their court, then you can't bring up the pattern of facts a second time in the
[01:27:15.800 --> 01:27:20.600]  case where I know I could have them in the common law court. Does that make sense?
[01:27:20.600 --> 01:27:26.960]  Yeah, it does make sense. I don't know how to confirm or deny that for you. That might
[01:27:26.960 --> 01:27:34.720]  be a question better suited for Randy. I'm sorry he's not with us this evening. But I
[01:27:34.720 --> 01:27:41.240]  don't have- I couldn't say for sure. I mean, what you're saying makes sense and I bet you're
[01:27:41.240 --> 01:27:45.200]  right. I just- I can't say so with authority.
[01:27:45.200 --> 01:27:51.800]  So, the thing is, if I jump out there, because you have a set amount of time before you can
[01:27:51.800 --> 01:27:58.360]  file a claim in that kind of court. And I think I'm going to be technicality deaf. I
[01:27:58.360 --> 01:28:02.440]  think they got their little rules and their little statutes that I don't know about and
[01:28:02.440 --> 01:28:07.320]  they'll throw the statute out that doesn't make any sense. But some judge somewhere agreed
[01:28:07.320 --> 01:28:16.800]  that this is the facts. So, it's just a sucker's- and a waste of time. So, it sounds to me after
[01:28:16.800 --> 01:28:20.280]  talking to you and I kind of- my gut's kind of telling me this and usually when I don't
[01:28:20.280 --> 01:28:27.760]  listen to my gut, I pay with it dearly. So, yeah. So, my gut's telling me this is a trap
[01:28:27.760 --> 01:28:32.640]  and I should just go with common law because to me, I mean, the facts seem pretty darn
[01:28:32.640 --> 01:28:38.440]  well slam dunk. I mean, there was injury and I had some weird- I got a sunburn inside in
[01:28:38.440 --> 01:28:41.640]  the shade one day at work. Now, how does that-
[01:28:41.640 --> 01:28:44.640]  Oh, wow. Yeah, I remember you mentioning that now.
[01:28:44.640 --> 01:28:49.400]  Yeah. I got the pictures. I took the pictures. I got a guy in the room that witnessed me
[01:28:49.400 --> 01:28:54.640]  come to work with no sunburn, sitting right next to me. He's near the window. I'm not.
[01:28:54.640 --> 01:28:58.760]  And that's like, I feel like I'm getting cooked. Of course, we have- maybe I'm sensitive to
[01:28:58.760 --> 01:29:06.760]  light wave radiation. They do have cell tower equipment, a floor and a half up from my head,
[01:29:06.760 --> 01:29:15.480]  but no one else in the room was turning color. So, only I was red. So, something changed
[01:29:15.480 --> 01:29:22.720]  my system. Something made that happen. And the only thing that's in close proximity to
[01:29:22.720 --> 01:29:28.400]  that was the swab and the mask. That's it. And I didn't receive full disclosure on either
[01:29:28.400 --> 01:29:29.400]  one of those things.
[01:29:29.400 --> 01:29:30.400]  Yeah, man.
[01:29:30.400 --> 01:29:37.400]  So, I think even a rookie like me might be able to take this one on.
[01:29:37.400 --> 01:29:47.440]  I bet so. Sometimes it doesn't take a lot. Just your tenacity. You know you're right
[01:29:47.440 --> 01:29:54.280]  and you're going to see it through. Sometimes that's enough to carry you through the difficulties
[01:29:54.280 --> 01:29:58.560]  of finding what you need to find along the way.
[01:29:58.560 --> 01:30:03.840]  Yeah, I know last time I asked for case law regarding this, but if this is going- do I
[01:30:03.840 --> 01:30:07.680]  need a bunch of case law for this, you think?
[01:30:07.680 --> 01:30:16.440]  No. I would try to find one, but if you don't have a whole lot, that's fine. Usually when
[01:30:16.440 --> 01:30:23.280]  lawyers write their pleadings, they'll make a statement and then put a legal authority
[01:30:23.280 --> 01:30:30.920]  behind it. If they're good. I say usually. A lot of times they just say just spurt and
[01:30:30.920 --> 01:30:35.240]  whatever they feel like out of their mouth. But if they're doing right, then they'll make
[01:30:35.240 --> 01:30:38.680]  a statement and they'll put the legal authority behind it. They don't necessarily put a bunch
[01:30:38.680 --> 01:30:41.080]  of them. It's pretty rare.
[01:30:41.080 --> 01:30:45.880]  So, I need one for negligence and one for full disclosure.
[01:30:45.880 --> 01:30:51.440]  Yeah, you want to find one. If you find two that are really on point, then good. Mention
[01:30:51.440 --> 01:30:59.800]  both of them. But what's more important than quantity is that they're on point.
[01:30:59.800 --> 01:31:00.800]  Right.
[01:31:00.800 --> 01:31:01.800]  So, yeah.
[01:31:01.800 --> 01:31:09.840]  Got it. I got it. Okay. Thanks, Randy. I mean, Brett, sorry about that.
[01:31:09.840 --> 01:31:18.600]  Yeah, you bet. Thanks for calling. Okay. So, our next caller is also a first time caller.
[01:31:18.600 --> 01:31:23.640]  Well, that wasn't a first time caller apparently. But Chris, I see you there. We'll get to you
[01:31:23.640 --> 01:31:34.560]  right after this 954 caller. If you're from 954, give us a first name and a state. Hello,
[01:31:34.560 --> 01:31:35.560]  954.
[01:31:35.560 --> 01:31:39.680]  Yes. Hi. Can you hear me?
[01:31:39.680 --> 01:31:45.760]  Yes. Give us a first name and a state.
[01:31:45.760 --> 01:31:48.880]  Jason and Florida.
[01:31:48.880 --> 01:31:54.360]  All right, Jason. Well, thank you for calling in. This is your first time?
[01:31:54.360 --> 01:31:56.960]  Yes, it is.
[01:31:56.960 --> 01:32:01.560]  Well, we're glad you called. And what's on your mind this evening?
[01:32:01.560 --> 01:32:13.040]  Sure. So, I have been dealing with a probate case for almost four years now. The case has
[01:32:13.040 --> 01:32:19.000]  been ongoing. They're finally trying to close it after over $150,000 worth of legal fees.
[01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:20.000]  Oh, my goodness.
[01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:27.920]  Yeah, cheers. So, yeah. Okay. So, we're just about to go to our sponsors. Just hold on.
[01:32:27.920 --> 01:32:32.160]  Hold that thought. We're going to get the sponsors and we'll continue on the other side.
[01:32:32.160 --> 01:32:34.760]  All right? Be right back.
[01:32:34.760 --> 01:32:40.840]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:32:40.840 --> 01:32:45.560]  of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we
[01:32:45.560 --> 01:32:51.640]  changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[01:32:51.640 --> 01:32:56.800]  is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and
[01:32:56.800 --> 01:33:03.480]  mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests
[01:33:03.480 --> 01:33:08.440]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Young
[01:33:08.440 --> 01:33:14.840]  Jevity so much. We became a marketing distributor, along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many
[01:33:14.840 --> 01:33:21.720]  others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:33:21.720 --> 01:33:27.240]  quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:33:27.240 --> 01:33:32.840]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:33:32.840 --> 01:33:39.800]  increase your income. Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:33:39.800 --> 01:33:46.680]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[01:33:46.680 --> 01:33:53.080]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your
[01:33:53.080 --> 01:33:58.680]  lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:33:58.680 --> 01:34:05.080]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[01:34:05.080 --> 01:34:11.000]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in
[01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:16.520]  a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[01:34:16.520 --> 01:34:22.200]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[01:34:22.200 --> 01:34:30.600]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:34:30.600 --> 01:34:54.440]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:34:54.440 --> 01:35:00.840]  Okay, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelty. I'm Brett Fountain,
[01:35:00.840 --> 01:35:08.520]  and we are talking with Jason in Florida. All right, Jason, what's up?
[01:35:08.520 --> 01:35:16.280]  So, my case, you know, it's pretty complicated and convoluted, so I'll try to get to the point
[01:35:16.280 --> 01:35:25.160]  of where I'm at now. There was a lot of fraud going on in my case, and I have been,
[01:35:27.240 --> 01:35:33.640]  over the past two years, filing documents of affidavits, filing documents saying that I
[01:35:33.640 --> 01:35:40.600]  fired the PR, because basically, I'm the sole heir, sole beneficiary, and the sole
[01:35:40.600 --> 01:35:47.240]  principal... Wait, you fired the what? The personal representative, the executive of the estate.
[01:35:48.120 --> 01:35:55.480]  Okay. Well, I've tried to on multiple occasions, and the attorney who represents the PR,
[01:35:55.480 --> 01:36:03.240]  the personal representative, he keeps suppressing my documents and keeps pushing forward. Anyways,
[01:36:03.240 --> 01:36:11.720]  long story short... Have you bar-grieved this attorney? Yes. So, I haven't bar-grieved him yet,
[01:36:11.720 --> 01:36:17.960]  but I did bar-grieve his former associate, which actually represents my ex, who had a claim for
[01:36:17.960 --> 01:36:24.920]  child support. Long story short, she used child support to try to go after my inheritance,
[01:36:25.480 --> 01:36:31.640]  and there was tons of fraud and all kinds of crazy stuff. Well, they recently tried to get
[01:36:31.640 --> 01:36:37.800]  the same judgment that they received in the probate court for a settlement for
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:44.120]  X amount of dollars of child support. They then, as I was trying to sell the condo that I inherited,
[01:36:45.240 --> 01:36:50.680]  sent the title company, a cease and desist, saying that I still owed an additional $98,000,
[01:36:52.280 --> 01:36:56.920]  and that that $98,000 need to be paid within the equity of the property when it was sold.
[01:36:56.920 --> 01:37:01.240]  However... The attorney says this, or a judge signed an order?
[01:37:02.520 --> 01:37:09.400]  No, the attorney goes to my federal agency last minute, like the day that we're about to close,
[01:37:10.040 --> 01:37:16.440]  saying, oh, there's these liens out there for child support for $98,000, but they had already
[01:37:16.440 --> 01:37:22.040]  received a judgment on settlement in the probate court. So, they tried to double dip. So,
[01:37:22.040 --> 01:37:30.520]  I did the criminal complaint against my ex-attorney. I then did an administrative
[01:37:30.520 --> 01:37:35.160]  process on the child support court. The child support court is actually in the process of
[01:37:35.160 --> 01:37:39.480]  bowing out because I did the whole proof of claim, and they failed to respond, and I
[01:37:40.040 --> 01:37:46.680]  basically defaulted them. And I'm taking them to court for declaratory judgment on that this week,
[01:37:46.680 --> 01:37:52.680]  but I'm also going to be filing a breach of fiduciary duty and other claims against the
[01:37:52.680 --> 01:37:56.520]  personal representative because they've all been kind of working in a civil conspiracy about all
[01:37:56.520 --> 01:38:06.280]  this. And now I'm about to hammer them all, but I want to try to get it out of Broward County.
[01:38:06.280 --> 01:38:11.640]  South Florida, Broward County is a very, very corrupt county. I want to be able to try to
[01:38:11.640 --> 01:38:17.080]  I want to be able to try to move it out of Broward County and perhaps get an injunction or something
[01:38:17.080 --> 01:38:22.440]  to stop them from closing the probate because there's all these alleged claims, but none of
[01:38:22.440 --> 01:38:27.080]  them have been proven, and I've got them dead to rights, which is why I'm going to file the breach
[01:38:27.080 --> 01:38:32.760]  of fiduciary duty to stop the probate. But I want to try to get it out of the county. How do I do that?
[01:38:32.760 --> 01:38:42.520]  Well, that's a good question. I think you mentioned earlier when you were talking about
[01:38:42.520 --> 01:38:47.320]  getting it out of Broward County, I recall seeing we've talked about this on telegram.
[01:38:47.960 --> 01:38:56.440]  And I think you were talking about you were going to name some state official that was outside the
[01:38:56.440 --> 01:39:03.000]  county, and that sounds like a perfect way to do it. You find another defendant that's not in Broward
[01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:10.440]  County, and now you've got you need to go to the next higher level, diversity. Okay. Yes, because
[01:39:11.160 --> 01:39:17.960]  they're taking the child support claims, which my ex had already turned it over to the Department
[01:39:17.960 --> 01:39:25.160]  of Revenue to collect on that claim. They were never able to. Then she did some funky
[01:39:25.160 --> 01:39:30.760]  judgment where I wasn't even served or anything, got a certain amount of money to come out of
[01:39:30.760 --> 01:39:37.720]  child support, and then they applied it to probate. A bunch of stuff. But I think since
[01:39:37.720 --> 01:39:42.440]  he's already sold the debt or sold my children basically to the state saying, hey, you know,
[01:39:42.440 --> 01:39:50.920]  collect his debt, isn't it... I recollect seeing it or reading it somewhere where once
[01:39:50.920 --> 01:40:01.080]  a person goes to the state and asks the state for their child support recovery services or
[01:40:02.280 --> 01:40:08.280]  enforcement services, isn't that debt sold? Or how can she come back and try to get it again?
[01:40:09.400 --> 01:40:12.760]  Yeah, I don't see any legitimacy to collecting the same debt twice.
[01:40:14.760 --> 01:40:15.240]  Exactly.
[01:40:16.040 --> 01:40:20.680]  Just the very fact that it came from that lawyer who obviously is trying to pull something.
[01:40:20.680 --> 01:40:27.400]  That's another clue. I'd be bargaining with these lawyers, the ones that are asserting that there
[01:40:27.400 --> 01:40:40.760]  is a claim. I would be... In Texas, it's chapter 32 about fraud, and I think it's 3249 saying it's
[01:40:40.760 --> 01:40:51.080]  a refusal to execute a release of a fraudulent claim or lien. So when somebody is faking it,
[01:40:51.080 --> 01:40:56.600]  saying, hey, I've got this lien. I've got a right to some interest in your property because
[01:40:56.600 --> 01:41:02.760]  unpaid whatever claim, and they're just... It's bogus. So you write to them and you say,
[01:41:02.760 --> 01:41:07.160]  you need to release this. This is what you're saying is not true. And then they have 21 days.
[01:41:07.160 --> 01:41:10.360]  If they don't release it in 21 days, they've committed a felony.
[01:41:11.240 --> 01:41:12.280]  Right. That would be some...
[01:41:12.280 --> 01:41:14.360]  Increase fraud, right? By creating a false lien?
[01:41:15.240 --> 01:41:15.720]  Right.
[01:41:16.840 --> 01:41:18.040]  Yeah. Okay.
[01:41:19.080 --> 01:41:22.360]  So I don't know if Florida's got that or if it's the same number of days,
[01:41:23.480 --> 01:41:30.200]  but definitely take a look at that. You would have more than one direction at the same time
[01:41:30.200 --> 01:41:31.720]  you could be slapping that lawyer.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:35.480]  What's the title of that statute you just said?
[01:41:35.480 --> 01:41:43.320]  I think it's 3249. Hold on just a second. Let me see if I'm telling you right. Texas penal code
[01:41:43.320 --> 01:41:58.920]  32.49. Let's see. I know it's in 32. Oh, yes, it is. It's refusal to execute release
[01:41:58.920 --> 01:42:01.720]  of fraudulent lien or claim. So...
[01:42:01.720 --> 01:42:07.560]  Refusal to execute release. Got it. Okay. All right. This one is not a felony. It's
[01:42:07.560 --> 01:42:11.560]  only a class A misdemeanor. It's the highest misdemeanor, but that's not up as high as a
[01:42:11.560 --> 01:42:20.040]  felony. But they have 21 days and then they're criminal. So you can bargrieve, you can file a
[01:42:20.040 --> 01:42:28.840]  criminal complaint and that'll sting him. He won't quickly want to be lying again.
[01:42:28.840 --> 01:42:33.400]  Florida. Sorry? Sorry. No, what I was saying was because
[01:42:34.280 --> 01:42:40.120]  Department of Revenue State of Florida is a party to the case, I can now bring in the state attorney
[01:42:40.120 --> 01:42:45.560]  general individually, right? I wouldn't want to go after office. I'd go after individually
[01:42:45.560 --> 01:42:53.640]  and then I can move it out of the county. As to whether you would do individually,
[01:42:53.640 --> 01:43:00.840]  I don't know if it would be individual. Okay.
[01:43:00.840 --> 01:43:06.440]  If you're bringing in the... What did the state attorney general do to you in his personal capacity?
[01:43:08.920 --> 01:43:18.520]  Well, they're representative. The guy who represents the child support enforcement program,
[01:43:18.520 --> 01:43:25.720]  which is the state attorney assistant, he is the one who's basically trying to drag me into
[01:43:27.480 --> 01:43:33.720]  an administrative hearing to get me to consent to allow them to now garnish my
[01:43:35.160 --> 01:43:38.440]  inheritance because they didn't do it right the first time. So now they're trying to cover their
[01:43:38.440 --> 01:43:43.880]  tracks. Gotcha. Okay. So yeah, that seems legit. That seems like a good way to go.
[01:43:43.880 --> 01:43:49.880]  Okay. Great. Awesome. Yeah. Then you get it out of the county.
[01:43:51.560 --> 01:43:54.600]  Yeah. Yeah, exactly. I'll just go after his boss.
[01:43:59.320 --> 01:44:05.240]  File criminal complaints and the only thing that I... And this was a question that I wanted to ask
[01:44:05.240 --> 01:44:09.800]  Randy at one point, but I didn't really have a chance. We just had a short brief email
[01:44:09.800 --> 01:44:16.520]  conversation, but when you file criminal complaints against these people and bar complaints and
[01:44:16.520 --> 01:44:23.960]  judicial complaints, because... And I don't think it's any different than anywhere else in the US,
[01:44:23.960 --> 01:44:33.000]  but in Broward it's extremely corrupt. There's a lot of messiness down there. I lost my family.
[01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:41.160]  My mother had a flip and fall allegedly when she passed away. And retaliatory,
[01:44:41.160 --> 01:44:46.840]  have you guys ever experienced anything from a retaliation standpoint from these officials,
[01:44:46.840 --> 01:44:50.760]  from the lawyers? Oh my, yes.
[01:44:53.160 --> 01:44:56.520]  Yeah. Yes. That's something to be prepared for.
[01:44:56.520 --> 01:45:05.720]  So from lawyers, not specifically, from other public officials, yes, it depends on how
[01:45:06.600 --> 01:45:13.320]  evil hearted they are. They just might do something really bad. Some of them won't dare to
[01:45:13.320 --> 01:45:18.440]  because they know that that's another crime. That's obstruction, retaliation, witness tampering,
[01:45:18.440 --> 01:45:23.720]  and others are just going to be so bold as to do something even more evil.
[01:45:23.720 --> 01:45:32.840]  I reported a sheriff's deputy for crimes. And right after that, I had a very thorough burglary.
[01:45:35.640 --> 01:45:43.080]  And it was extremely personal the way that they took everything. They didn't just come and take
[01:45:43.080 --> 01:45:48.680]  what they thought, you know, oh, let's get his solar equipment. Let's just... No, they didn't just
[01:45:48.680 --> 01:45:58.200]  take a little bit. They went for a very thorough house cleaning. They took, you know, every stick
[01:45:58.200 --> 01:46:08.760]  of furniture. They took my son's nightlight. They took half-burned candles. They were serious about
[01:46:08.760 --> 01:46:16.600]  whoever it was that was getting these items. They wanted them to make a point. So, you know,
[01:46:16.600 --> 01:46:22.360]  I suspect that sheriff's deputy and, you know, one of his buddies, there were two guys, they came,
[01:46:22.360 --> 01:46:28.760]  I could tell from footprints and tire tracks, they came with a trailer and cleaned me out.
[01:46:29.720 --> 01:46:34.280]  So, yes, there's a possibility of some retaliation. But then what is that? That's another crime.
[01:46:35.960 --> 01:46:40.840]  So, I've never seen anything like that happen with lawyers. Lawyers, they tend to, you know,
[01:46:40.840 --> 01:46:45.240]  their voice goes up a couple of octaves, they were up screaming and they went out. They went
[01:46:45.240 --> 01:46:50.840]  away. They don't want anything to do with you. They're in a hurry to escape. That's the
[01:46:50.840 --> 01:46:55.800]  difference I've noticed in patterns. But, yeah, bargaining them.
[01:46:57.800 --> 01:47:03.480]  And what are your thoughts with this type of case with regards to getting them in a federal court
[01:47:03.480 --> 01:47:11.640]  or, you know, suing them for, you know, not necessarily in 1983, but potentially wire fraud
[01:47:11.640 --> 01:47:18.600]  for transferring my parent's funds after I'd already revoked power of attorney.
[01:47:18.600 --> 01:47:23.320]  Okay. Yeah, great. Let's talk about that some more. We're just about to go to our sponsors again,
[01:47:23.320 --> 01:47:28.920]  so we'll talk about that some more. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[01:47:29.480 --> 01:47:33.240]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:47:33.880 --> 01:47:39.800]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the
[01:47:39.800 --> 01:47:46.520]  profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation
[01:47:46.520 --> 01:47:53.080]  is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:47:53.720 --> 01:47:59.560]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the
[01:47:59.560 --> 01:48:04.920]  riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would
[01:48:04.920 --> 01:48:10.680]  like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact
[01:48:10.680 --> 01:48:20.920]  study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online
[01:48:20.920 --> 01:48:28.840]  at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[01:48:28.840 --> 01:48:35.880]  logosradionetwork.com.