ROL_2021-10-08_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.440]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.840]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $200.00
[00:29.840 --> 00:41.440]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:45.840 --> 00:52.400]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:57.360]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade,
[00:57.360 --> 01:00.240]  killing 10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:04.480 --> 01:09.920]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven attacks his
[01:09.920 --> 01:14.880]  law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio
[01:14.880 --> 01:18.720]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones,
[01:18.720 --> 01:23.040]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test
[01:23.040 --> 01:28.240]  the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this month
[01:28.240 --> 01:33.440]  that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:33.440 --> 01:37.600]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:37.600 --> 01:42.800]  that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas
[01:42.800 --> 01:49.600]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities too
[01:49.600 --> 01:56.080]  like the District Attorney in El Paso, Kima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month
[01:56.080 --> 02:01.760]  that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.760 --> 02:06.720]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.720 --> 02:11.200]  in Harris County who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[02:11.200 --> 02:15.920]  illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something,
[02:15.920 --> 02:24.960]  the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five
[02:24.960 --> 02:29.920]  and a half inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico,
[02:29.920 --> 02:35.440]  the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[02:35.440 --> 02:40.720]  being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the
[02:40.720 --> 02:47.440]  shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized
[02:47.440 --> 03:11.440]  to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This is Rook Rody with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:17.440 --> 03:27.440]  This is Rook Rody with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:47.920 --> 04:00.480]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio on this Friday,
[04:00.480 --> 04:11.600]  the eighth day of October, 2021. And we had some requests on our Telegram channel to talk about
[04:11.600 --> 04:20.880]  and explain some issues. Could you take a minute over the broadcast to go over court structure?
[04:22.880 --> 04:29.760]  Not sure what they're asking there, but in all states, the court structure is
[04:30.800 --> 04:38.720]  almost exactly the same. We start with what's called inferior courts,
[04:38.720 --> 04:46.880]  municipal courts, and justice of the peace courts. And they call them inferior courts,
[04:46.880 --> 04:54.880]  not because they're inferior specifically, but they can be presided over by nonlawyers.
[04:57.280 --> 05:04.000]  And by inferior, that means that their rulings don't carry the weight that
[05:04.000 --> 05:12.400]  courts that must be provided and presided over by a lawyer do. And that presided over
[05:12.400 --> 05:18.320]  by a lawyer does not include municipal courts of record. I don't know if every state has those,
[05:18.320 --> 05:28.640]  but Texas does. A municipality can get its court designated as a court of record.
[05:28.640 --> 05:35.200]  And if they do that, then you have to, in order to appeal, you must appeal on point of error.
[05:36.160 --> 05:44.640]  But if they get their court designated as a court of record, then the municipal judge must be a lawyer.
[05:45.680 --> 05:53.120]  I don't know about you, but it seems like that could easily be viewed the opposite direction as well.
[05:53.120 --> 06:01.440]  I want somebody that, I want the real thing. I want people. I don't want somebody that's part of the
[06:02.960 --> 06:09.920]  bar clubs. Now quit being tacky. You're going to hurt these lawyers' feelings.
[06:12.640 --> 06:15.920]  You would not want to do that. No, no, certainly not. Okay.
[06:15.920 --> 06:23.520]  So back to that inferior. I knew where you were going.
[06:26.480 --> 06:34.400]  Okay. So while they may be inferior, they're not considered as inferior. Okay,
[06:34.400 --> 06:42.000]  municipal courts and JP courts, from those courts and appeal from those courts to a higher court
[06:42.000 --> 06:51.440]  that an appeal from one of these courts will go to a county court or in, I think, Pennsylvania,
[06:51.440 --> 06:57.440]  it would be called the court of common pleas and other states at Louisiana, no, no, no,
[06:57.440 --> 07:03.680]  tell them what it is. That's a whole different country. But different states may have different
[07:03.680 --> 07:09.520]  designations, but you go from the inferior courts, any appeal from those courts will go to the county
[07:09.520 --> 07:20.800]  court and the appeal will be appeal trial de novo. And what the lawyers will try to tell you is that
[07:21.680 --> 07:30.400]  it's a do over. Well, it is and it isn't. It's a do over for you, but not for them. Well,
[07:30.400 --> 07:36.480]  that's not even correct either. It's not a fully a do over for you to one. It is trial de novo
[07:36.480 --> 07:46.320]  for the purpose of perfecting your appeal. And what that means is you don't have to appeal on
[07:46.320 --> 07:54.960]  point of error. Now, when I just said that, I realized the point of error. Okay. You have to,
[07:55.520 --> 08:03.360]  in any appeal in any of the higher courts, you appeal abuse of discretion.
[08:03.360 --> 08:14.960]  Okay. Now, I have case law that Walker V Packer says that the only appeal you can have is an
[08:14.960 --> 08:21.840]  appeal for abuse of discretion where you essentially where the judge did something wrong, right?
[08:21.840 --> 08:29.280]  Yes. You led to re argue the facts of your case and where were you the night of the 25th?
[08:29.280 --> 08:34.720]  You it's something that the judge did wrong that you're asking the appellate court to take a look
[08:34.720 --> 08:42.720]  at. Exactly. That's what the only thing you can appeal and where the judge failed to properly
[08:42.720 --> 08:54.960]  apply the law to the facts. So that kind of contradicts what I said about a court of record
[08:54.960 --> 09:03.680]  that you would have to appeal on point of error. Well, the law actually says that, but
[09:04.960 --> 09:12.080]  I have never seen it enforced that way. Anyone who appeals from a municipal court,
[09:12.080 --> 09:17.760]  be it court of record or not, the county court never asks for point of error.
[09:17.760 --> 09:30.400]  And they retry the case. But what I meant about it not being a do over is what they want to hide
[09:30.400 --> 09:39.040]  from you is the fact that anything they say or do in the original trial court becomes collateral
[09:39.040 --> 09:49.760]  estoppel. For instance, if the witness police officer says something really stupid and essentially
[09:49.760 --> 09:59.840]  makes a unfortunate admission, that admission is goes to collateral estoppel. What if he
[10:01.200 --> 10:08.160]  completely pergers himself where he ought to be impeached in his all of his testimony stricken
[10:08.160 --> 10:14.800]  but now we're going to sort of do over. Does he get to come back in there and start over and
[10:14.800 --> 10:23.280]  pretend like he's a credible person? Only if you fail to raise the issue. But if collateral estoppel
[10:23.280 --> 10:30.480]  for that, for any actions he does in the trial court as well, you can bring all of their bad
[10:30.480 --> 10:37.840]  behavior into the appellate court. And they want to tell you it's a do over so you can't do that.
[10:37.840 --> 10:45.120]  But don't let them. Anyway, okay, so from the municipal or justice court to the county court
[10:45.840 --> 10:53.280]  and appeal from a county court to a district court. Most states have county district except for
[10:53.280 --> 11:00.080]  New York. The lowest court in New York is the supreme. I'm not even going to try to explain
[11:00.080 --> 11:06.240]  that one. They don't even let each other park on the proper side of the road. They keep changing
[11:06.240 --> 11:13.680]  their mind about where you're supposed to park. So check your state and you can find a chart that
[11:13.680 --> 11:19.520]  shows the level of the courts. And I'm not going to go through all that detail. I'm going to go
[11:19.520 --> 11:26.960]  through the parts that make a big difference. When you appeal from a county court, a lot of people
[11:26.960 --> 11:35.120]  and I see it on the channel, think that you appeal to the district court. You do not. The county court
[11:35.120 --> 11:42.080]  and the district court are both presided over by judges who had to have a bar card before they could
[11:42.080 --> 11:51.440]  be elected as a judge. So they're presumed to be knowledgeable in law. And one is not presumed to
[11:51.440 --> 11:58.560]  be more knowledgeable than the other. So a district court cannot overrule a county court.
[11:58.560 --> 12:06.000]  Both of those, if you file an appeal, it always goes to the court of appeals. Because the court of
[12:06.000 --> 12:16.000]  appeals is the one, is the first court that rules on point of law on errors by the judge. So any
[12:16.000 --> 12:23.600]  appeal from either county or district will appeal to the court of appeals. Now, that's basically
[12:23.600 --> 12:35.920]  your structure. And each state will have either levels of criminal cases or amounts that each of
[12:35.920 --> 12:44.560]  the courts can address. Or severity of a crime, if it's criminal. Yeah, level. For the most part,
[12:44.560 --> 12:54.960]  the county courts do misdemeanors. Inferior courts do class C misdemeanors that have no
[12:54.960 --> 13:02.160]  imprisonment as a punishment. And that's because these lower judges aren't necessarily as schooled
[13:02.160 --> 13:10.160]  in law. So they don't want them inadvertently throwing people in jail. So they handle class Cs,
[13:10.160 --> 13:17.200]  the county court handles the rest of the misdemeanors and felonies go to the district court.
[13:18.240 --> 13:22.160]  So then after you mentioned the court of appeals, and then what would be the level
[13:22.160 --> 13:29.600]  above that if somebody's needing to appeal again? That would be the supreme. Yes.
[13:30.800 --> 13:37.520]  And in Texas, if it's criminal, it would be the court of criminal appeals. We have two high courts.
[13:37.520 --> 13:44.400]  We go big. The court of criminal appeals handles all criminal appeals. The supreme
[13:44.400 --> 13:54.560]  handles all civil appeals. Okay, a savior in court and the judge renders a ruling.
[13:56.160 --> 14:00.800]  For instance, you challenge subject matter jurisdiction and the judge denies it.
[14:00.800 --> 14:13.840]  Well, if the judge in fact did not have jurisdiction and you appealed, the appellate court would throw
[14:13.840 --> 14:24.560]  out the whole case. So anytime the judge renders a ruling that will change your ability to adjudicate
[14:24.560 --> 14:32.960]  the case, that is right for interlocutory appeal. You can appeal that ruling because
[14:32.960 --> 14:38.960]  it will dramatically change the case on subject matter jurisdiction if they rule in your favor,
[14:38.960 --> 14:50.160]  the case goes away. So to allow the case to continue in the face of a what you believe
[14:50.160 --> 14:59.280]  is an improper ruling would waste everybody's time and money having to adjudicate the whole case
[14:59.280 --> 15:05.360]  because that would be a dispositive. That's a dispositive motion. It's ruled in your favor,
[15:05.360 --> 15:16.480]  the case is disposed of. And generally you can do an interlocutory appeal on a dispositive
[15:16.480 --> 15:22.960]  issue that will either dispose of the case itself or dispose of an issue before the court
[15:22.960 --> 15:30.800]  so that you don't have to adjudicate the issue. It might be good to just mention that interlocutory
[15:30.800 --> 15:38.800]  is in between the speaking like locution interlocutory. It means you're budding into the middle of
[15:38.800 --> 15:45.600]  what's going on in the lower court. You're throwing a flag on the field and making everything pause
[15:45.600 --> 15:52.800]  and jump up to that higher court to deal with that one issue, that bad ruling. It's kind of like
[15:52.800 --> 16:01.280]  having the refs review the videotape. So the other one is a writ of mandamus.
[16:03.600 --> 16:11.440]  You could either file an interlocutory appeal for a denial of a challenge subject matter jurisdiction
[16:11.440 --> 16:19.360]  or you could petition for writ of mandamus. That's what we did in one case and the court
[16:19.360 --> 16:26.800]  of appeals threw out the whole issue. It was an issue of subject matter jurisdiction over
[16:27.520 --> 16:32.000]  a particular issue in the case. There was more to the case than just that issue.
[16:33.360 --> 16:39.360]  And the judge ruled against us out of hand so they were really being stinkers.
[16:39.360 --> 16:47.200]  And when you go into court and the judge and the prosecutor does everything wrong and people generally
[16:47.200 --> 16:52.080]  feel frustrated and betrayed, we'll come back on the other side. We'll explain why that may be a
[16:52.080 --> 17:03.360]  good thing. We'll be right back. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls,
[17:03.360 --> 17:09.360]  letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the michael mirris proven method. Michael
[17:09.360 --> 17:14.800]  mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll
[17:14.800 --> 17:20.000]  get step-by-step instructions in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil rights
[17:20.000 --> 17:25.680]  statutes. What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons. How to answer letters and
[17:25.680 --> 17:30.160]  phone calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports. How to turn the financial
[17:30.160 --> 17:36.640]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The michael mirris proven method is the solution
[17:36.640 --> 17:41.360]  for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more
[17:41.360 --> 17:47.280]  information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue michael mirris banner or email
[17:47.280 --> 17:58.400]  michael mirris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com. To learn how to stop
[17:58.400 --> 18:05.360]  debt collectors now. Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's
[18:05.360 --> 18:09.520]  america we live in a us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[18:09.520 --> 18:13.680]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[18:13.680 --> 18:17.680]  travel freely from place to place. The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly
[18:17.680 --> 18:22.080]  the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to
[18:22.080 --> 18:26.240]  learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former sheriff's deputy
[18:26.240 --> 18:30.160]  a craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching
[18:30.160 --> 18:34.400]  tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule
[18:34.400 --> 18:38.960]  of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[18:38.960 --> 18:42.800]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas
[18:42.800 --> 18:47.760]  transportation code the law versus the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds
[18:47.760 --> 18:51.520]  of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights
[18:51.520 --> 18:55.920]  with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we
[18:55.920 --> 19:21.920]  can have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:25.920 --> 19:43.360]  Okay we are back Randy Kelton Brett Fountain rule of law radio and when we went out I was
[19:43.360 --> 19:53.520]  going to a very important point Brett what was that point let's see I would if you could
[19:53.520 --> 20:03.760]  remind me of what to remind you. Wait a minute I'm the old guy here okay we were we were talking
[20:03.760 --> 20:15.840]  about interlocutory appeals and and the court of criminal appeals and the supreme okay interlocutory
[20:15.840 --> 20:27.040]  appeal is where the I don't know that how much difference it is from a mandamus because in an
[20:27.040 --> 20:33.040]  interlocutory appeal you are claiming that the judge failed to properly apply the law to the
[20:33.040 --> 20:40.320]  facts but it's also the same thing in a mandamus. Well the mandamus as I see it as being there
[20:40.320 --> 20:46.800]  wasn't necessarily a decision on the judge's part he just may be doing something that's
[20:46.800 --> 20:54.320]  against the law and he needs to be told by a higher judge to follow the law okay good point
[20:54.320 --> 21:01.760]  good point yes it encompasses more than just that one ruling that he maybe needs to correct.
[21:01.760 --> 21:08.160]  Let's say the judge is not putting your case on for trial like Ted Scarlett
[21:08.160 --> 21:14.960]  he went for a long time he couldn't get him to bring it to court right so that's not interlocutory
[21:14.960 --> 21:19.760]  because there's not something but the decision of the judge that needs to be corrected that's
[21:19.760 --> 21:26.880]  dispositive but there is something that he's doing that's illegal or it's prejudicial in some way
[21:27.440 --> 21:32.240]  or something he's supposed to do that he hasn't that's why we keep you around Brett
[21:32.240 --> 21:42.000]  you bail me out of these spots okay that's essentially the difference between a mandamus
[21:42.000 --> 21:48.640]  and interlocutory appeal and you can do those at any time and primarily you do a mandamus
[21:48.640 --> 21:58.320]  or a interlocutory a mandamus in order to get the case to be adjudicated correctly
[21:58.320 --> 22:08.400]  and interlocutory is for judicial economy so that you don't try out the entire case
[22:08.960 --> 22:17.520]  and then wind up having it overturned based on on that ruling that you would file an interlocutory
[22:17.520 --> 22:30.960]  appeal over I also see it as being including the the judge's action in ruling when you're doing
[22:30.960 --> 22:39.280]  a mandamus whereas interlocutory so there was a judge who he dared to rule on his own emotion
[22:39.280 --> 22:48.320]  for his own judicial disqualification so it wasn't the content of his ruling granted or denied
[22:48.320 --> 22:56.080]  wasn't what needed to be addressed with interlocutory it was the very fact that he dared to do that
[22:56.080 --> 23:06.640]  himself right if on a motion for refusal the judge can rule on that himself but not disqualification
[23:06.640 --> 23:12.880]  exactly so okay that's the difference between mandamus and interlocutory
[23:14.480 --> 23:20.720]  what else oh one thing I like to do before we even get to the point of
[23:21.680 --> 23:27.440]  taking it up to the next notch into a higher court is while you're standing there in the
[23:27.440 --> 23:34.640]  courtroom and the judge is giving you know ruling improperly ask the judge right there
[23:34.640 --> 23:36.640]  on what grounds your honor
[23:40.000 --> 23:45.040]  they don't tend to like that and they have various responses that all pretty much sound
[23:45.040 --> 23:51.280]  like because I said so and so then you raise defense raises an exception
[23:52.800 --> 23:57.520]  and that's like throwing a flag on the field it doesn't stop at him from doing whatever he's doing
[23:57.520 --> 24:05.200]  but it goes in the record and he didn't really will just say noted and I have asked the judge for a
[24:06.240 --> 24:10.160]  a recess that I may have time to file for a read a mandamus
[24:12.480 --> 24:17.120]  you can do that too and this goes to the next thing I was going to speak to
[24:18.320 --> 24:24.400]  when you go into court and the court rules against you out of hand at every turn
[24:24.400 --> 24:32.480]  you tend to get frustrated and you feel betrayed and defeated
[24:34.480 --> 24:38.720]  you shouldn't that's not always a bad thing
[24:41.040 --> 24:49.760]  according to Dr. Graves your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal
[24:49.760 --> 24:55.520]  in the case we spoke to earlier where we filed a petition for read a mandamus
[24:56.720 --> 25:05.040]  the court the city the prosecutor I mean the defense counsel's cost we had sued them
[25:06.960 --> 25:16.960]  were absolute stinkers they did everything they could to make it difficult or impossible
[25:16.960 --> 25:24.480]  to adjudicate the case even to the point that we had a hearing to disqualify the judge
[25:25.200 --> 25:32.480]  and they had to bring in an outside judge to do that bring in the head administrative judge
[25:33.920 --> 25:42.720]  and he stopped that hearing and reprimanded the lawyers and told them you're not going
[25:42.720 --> 25:52.320]  to railroad this client in my court because of the way they were acting and when he filed the
[25:52.320 --> 26:02.560]  mandamus in texas only the court only picks up 12 percent of the mandamus is filed and they rule
[26:02.560 --> 26:13.280]  in favor of the filer 2 percent of the time the issue we were raising the we were raising the
[26:14.080 --> 26:25.680]  constitutionality of municipal ordinances because it was such an difficult issue
[26:25.680 --> 26:36.720]  you and essentially we were right the court of appeals looked in the record and found a
[26:37.520 --> 26:42.960]  reason totally different from us what we've raised we raised that the city ordinances
[26:42.960 --> 26:48.640]  could only apply to city employees or people in contractual privity with the city
[26:48.640 --> 26:56.560]  and they came up with the fact that before they could have the kind of hearing they were having
[26:57.360 --> 27:07.920]  the city council had to issue a had to hold some kind of hearing and and issue a council
[27:07.920 --> 27:15.360]  meeting and adopt a certain particular rule yeah or in the heck did they come up with that
[27:15.360 --> 27:23.520]  that but they did that so they could dismiss that issue and get it off the table to keep it
[27:23.520 --> 27:31.280]  from going to the supreme but does not want to address the constitutionality issue and and for me
[27:31.280 --> 27:40.080]  that was very informative when the court would go to that much trouble now they could have just
[27:40.080 --> 27:47.200]  ignored it they just could have just refused to pick it up but I think they saw a freight
[27:47.200 --> 27:52.880]  and a train wreck coming at them and they took the mandamus as an opportunity to make that issue
[27:52.880 --> 28:00.960]  go away and it worked for them my point here is the worse they are in the trial court the better
[28:00.960 --> 28:08.080]  for you the more likely you are to get it turned overturned and when you bring issues in the trial
[28:08.080 --> 28:16.640]  court you always want to bring issues that if they're ruled in your favor it changes underlying law
[28:17.920 --> 28:25.520]  and the court of appeals never wants to change underlying law they don't want those kinds of
[28:25.520 --> 28:32.240]  issues coming to the court there is the jazanowski case the guy we send to his mortgage on the last
[28:32.240 --> 28:39.040]  possible day the cost of some ten dollar overcharge or a hundred dollar overcharge some minor nothing
[28:40.160 --> 28:50.080]  and the wells fargo took that case all the way to the supreme and the supreme court
[28:50.080 --> 28:59.840]  reamed them big time ruled against them may cause them major grief and when I looked at it I said
[28:59.840 --> 29:08.560]  thought who is the moron that ever led a case like this get to the supreme you don't let get cases
[29:08.560 --> 29:16.480]  get to the supreme that could possibly ruin your whole business yeah keep in mind righty these
[29:16.480 --> 29:23.520]  these were the not the inferior people these were the lawier people yeah these are the big money
[29:23.520 --> 29:33.040]  guys for the for the bank i said who is that nuts what's your thinking cap on guys and so when i
[29:33.040 --> 29:40.960]  created cases i always want to look for those kinds of rulings that would disrupt the corpus churus
[29:42.880 --> 29:46.400]  we'll speak to that a little bit when we come back i'm gonna turn the phone lines on
[29:46.400 --> 29:55.280]  drandy kelton breath fountain ruler radio we'll be right back five one two six four six
[29:55.280 --> 30:04.960]  nineteen eighty four i was gonna say that it's clear cell phones have changed the way we live
[30:04.960 --> 30:09.360]  and work but have they negatively affected our health i'm dr. kathryn albrecht and i'll be back
[30:09.360 --> 30:14.560]  in just a moment with new findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry
[30:14.560 --> 30:20.800]  privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[30:20.800 --> 30:26.320]  and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so protect
[30:26.320 --> 30:32.640]  your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging
[30:32.640 --> 30:37.920]  on to this public service announcement is brought to you by start page dot com the private search
[30:37.920 --> 30:45.920]  engine alternative to google yahoo and bin start over with start page cell phones emit radio
[30:45.920 --> 30:50.560]  frequency energy it's a fact but whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of
[30:50.560 --> 30:55.440]  radiation near your head has been disputed some have blamed it for brain tumors while cell phone
[30:55.440 --> 31:00.320]  companies have downplayed concerns well now the journal of the american medical association is
[31:00.320 --> 31:06.000]  confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry a study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose
[31:06.000 --> 31:10.880]  metabolism in the area of the brain closest to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell
[31:10.880 --> 31:16.000]  phone is on while researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage i'm not taking any
[31:16.000 --> 31:21.760]  chances i always keep the phone far from my body and i use a corded headset i'm dr. kathryn
[31:21.760 --> 31:32.960]  albrecht more news and information at kathryn albrecht dot com i lost my son my uncle my son
[31:32.960 --> 31:39.200]  on september 11th 2000 most people don't know that a third tower fell on september 11 world trade
[31:39.200 --> 31:45.040]  center seven a 47 story skyscraper was not hit by a plane although the official explanation is that
[31:45.040 --> 31:50.160]  fire brought down building seven over 1200 architects and engineers had looked into the
[31:50.160 --> 31:55.600]  evidence and believed there is more to the story bring justice to my son my uncle my nephew my son
[31:55.600 --> 32:02.720]  go to building what dot org why a cell why it matters as what you can do logos radio network
[32:02.720 --> 32:08.560]  welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year scripture talk with nano will begin wednesday
[32:08.560 --> 32:15.520]  january eighth from eight to ten p.m central time our goal is in accord with matthew 516 let your
[32:15.520 --> 32:20.880]  light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your father which is in
[32:20.880 --> 32:27.040]  heaven we wish to reflect god's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear join
[32:27.040 --> 32:32.400]  nana and guests for both verse by verse bible studies and topical bible studies designed to
[32:32.400 --> 32:38.800]  provoke onto love and good works our verse by verse bible studies will begin in the book of matthew
[32:38.800 --> 32:44.240]  where we will discuss one chapter per week our topical bible studies will vary each week and
[32:44.240 --> 32:50.000]  will explore sound doctrine as well as christian character development so mark your calendar and
[32:50.000 --> 32:57.040]  join us live on logos radio network dot com wednesdays from eight to ten p.m starting january eighth
[32:57.040 --> 33:05.680]  for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the scriptures you're listening to the logos radio
[33:05.680 --> 33:20.960]  network and logos radio network dot com yeah i got that one rent and i'm gonna solve them to the
[33:20.960 --> 33:37.760]  head of a man okay
[33:41.200 --> 33:44.400]  well i need a prosecute back to come and help me
[33:44.400 --> 33:50.640]  prosecute them wicked leader you see them are the right liar them tell them i lie and not tell
[33:50.640 --> 33:56.560]  six stories i believe me so what them tell me three percent of america vote for motion
[33:56.560 --> 34:03.360]  so how do you get the president that's why we have a warrant for you everybody listen carefully
[34:03.360 --> 34:18.640]  listen to the word
[34:18.640 --> 34:32.400]  okay we are back ranch helden brett fountain
[34:32.400 --> 34:40.880]  ruva radio and the color board is already full so we're going to go to steven in texas
[34:40.880 --> 34:50.480]  hello steven what do you have for us today all right um something on the lower on the
[34:50.480 --> 34:59.760]  lower courts like you were talking about i had a question in regard to a fine only offense that
[34:59.760 --> 35:07.520]  my wife had got a ticket on and when i looked up in there when i looked up in their code
[35:07.520 --> 35:12.320]  of ordinances we've already had all these discussions i'm just trying to get straight to
[35:12.320 --> 35:17.200]  the point about the origin of an ordinance and what it means but there's nothing actually in
[35:17.200 --> 35:25.520]  their code of ordinances that lists this as a offense on my property is even having a fine
[35:25.520 --> 35:32.560]  there there's no such thing that it has a section of finable offenses in the code of ordinance is
[35:32.560 --> 35:38.720]  and this doesn't exist in it so if they're pulling a fine out of thin air
[35:41.040 --> 35:46.240]  which is not listed on any schedule that they've got they even have a schedule of fee fines and fees
[35:47.360 --> 35:51.840]  for the municipal court and it's not on that either and most of those don't exist in the
[35:51.840 --> 35:57.840]  city ordinance either by the way well what would they do to me if i came down to their
[35:57.840 --> 36:02.640]  municipality and i tried to find you
[36:09.760 --> 36:16.160]  yeah do you have to film me again from what you from what you told me they have no more power
[36:16.160 --> 36:24.480]  to find you than i do that's impersonating a public official that's simulating a legal
[36:24.480 --> 36:33.760]  process thirty two forty six texas penal code we had the republic of texas group for a while
[36:33.760 --> 36:41.600]  there they were filing uh leans against public officials and the legislature got real creative
[36:41.600 --> 36:57.440]  and they added into the law thirty two point forty six seven and eight and under thirty two point six
[36:59.360 --> 37:06.960]  forty eight is simulating legal process what's forty six but i lost them
[37:06.960 --> 37:13.200]  and is that a securing execution of a document by deception okay so this would be forty eight
[37:14.000 --> 37:20.640]  but but they they put those in there to stop the republic of texas group from filing these leans
[37:22.640 --> 37:28.400]  the problem is and now we get to use them so you've had the municipality
[37:28.400 --> 37:37.280]  uh attempt to adjudicate a case against you and collect a fine
[37:39.200 --> 37:43.840]  but it's not a fineable offense if it's not a fineable offense it's not a prosecutable offense
[37:45.760 --> 37:53.200]  unless they file a civil suit against you no but if they file it if they file a criminal
[37:53.200 --> 38:00.240]  suit against case against you you know there are laws out there that restrict you from doing things
[38:01.120 --> 38:04.160]  but they don't all have a remedy if you ignore them
[38:06.720 --> 38:10.800]  this sounds like one of them it might be an oversight
[38:12.480 --> 38:18.400]  their oversight not your oversight their problem not your problem
[38:18.400 --> 38:26.640]  um and the problem gets a lot bigger when a public official exerts so purports to exert an
[38:26.640 --> 38:33.120]  authority he does not expressly have which is a violation of 39.03 penal code now i got chewed
[38:33.120 --> 38:39.440]  out yesterday by mary and she's on next about saying 39.03 penal code so i'm going to fix that
[38:39.440 --> 38:54.320]  that's 39.03 texas penal code it's in chapter 39 chapter 39 are offenses that only public
[38:54.320 --> 39:02.240]  officials can commit so everybody should read chapter 39 got all kind of cool stuff in there
[39:02.240 --> 39:11.440]  i would understand what was the problem you said the same thing well he didn't say what the issue
[39:11.440 --> 39:19.120]  was and if it doesn't have a penalty it doesn't matter okay it's an it's an ordinance it says
[39:19.120 --> 39:28.000]  you can't do this thing but if there is no penalty so what they're trying to add a penalty to
[39:28.000 --> 39:36.560]  something doesn't have one am i right in that steven that would be my understanding sir if
[39:36.560 --> 39:43.040]  it's not listed in there specifically in the city or and the the city if the city has not created
[39:43.040 --> 39:48.400]  such a fine for such an offense then how can you be charging me for it that's reporting the
[39:48.400 --> 39:54.960]  there you go you're i'm sorry does that also qualify a listen to get last night's program
[39:54.960 --> 40:01.680]  would that be well hold on one more step is that not something that would qualify for a judicial
[40:01.680 --> 40:10.400]  complaint oh it would qualify more directly for a criminal complaint and that's where i was going
[40:12.000 --> 40:18.960]  this is not just an administrative issue judicia conduct complaints are for administrative issues
[40:18.960 --> 40:29.280]  this is criminal sure when they they exert the authority to assess a fine when they don't
[40:29.280 --> 40:36.160]  have that authority that's crime in state texas course a misdemeanor and i think simulating
[40:36.160 --> 40:44.880]  a legal process where they convene a hearing for the purpose of collecting this fine that
[40:44.880 --> 40:58.800]  sounds like a violation of 15.02 15.02 is criminal conspiracy you have a number of these public
[40:58.800 --> 41:06.800]  officials who have conspired one with the other to commit the act of simulating a legal process
[41:06.800 --> 41:15.440]  well see this all goes back to the fact they're retaliating against me by finding my wife on
[41:15.440 --> 41:21.200]  a piece of property instead of coming after me after i filed criminal charges last year
[41:22.400 --> 41:28.960]  and i made no criminal complaints in march so they're going after her she's the week i'm
[41:28.960 --> 41:32.480]  going to say it right there or whatever she's the weak link i don't care if anybody knows
[41:32.480 --> 41:36.400]  she's going to couple to anything they asked her to do and it's coming out of my bank account
[41:36.400 --> 41:44.400]  which is highly irritating me so uh i'm i'm going to get together here if you have knowledge that
[41:44.400 --> 41:51.440]  a crime has been committed you have a duty to report that crime and if you report that crime to
[41:51.440 --> 42:03.040]  someone and they say you report it to a magistrate brett are you familiar with 15.09 texas code
[42:03.040 --> 42:10.800]  depending on procedure 15.09 i just came across that one i've seen it before but somehow it didn't
[42:10.800 --> 42:18.640]  stick in my brand so what is forwarding when they give it to somebody else they give it to another
[42:19.200 --> 42:26.800]  magistrate we see it says it says when a when a complaint is forwarded to them a magistrate
[42:26.800 --> 42:34.800]  now it doesn't say forwarded to the magistrate by who it just says forward it that the magistrate
[42:34.800 --> 42:42.880]  needs to issue a warrant a warrant and i was thinking the magistrate had to receive the same
[42:42.880 --> 42:49.920]  shall forthwith issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused boom that's pretty straightforward
[42:49.920 --> 42:54.880]  so i was thinking well he would that would invoke his duties a magistrate and hold an
[42:54.880 --> 43:00.240]  examining trial but the accused is not there so it's an exporter examining trial it looks like
[43:00.240 --> 43:05.280]  the legislature's already handled that when the client's given to the magistrate the magistrate
[43:05.280 --> 43:13.920]  issues a warrant and doesn't hold an exporter examining trial and that's why it says arrest
[43:13.920 --> 43:22.080]  this person and bring him before me so that so the magistrate can then hold an examining trial
[43:22.080 --> 43:30.640]  but in this case the mayor happens to be a magistrate the municipal judge happens to be
[43:30.640 --> 43:38.480]  a magistrate but they're they're kind of implicated the mayor is responding as superior
[43:39.760 --> 43:46.960]  so steven what would happen if you went to the local justice of the peace and filed these
[43:46.960 --> 43:54.400]  complaints with him or her and then when him or her doesn't act on these complaints
[43:56.000 --> 43:58.400]  in accordance with 15.09
[44:00.480 --> 44:06.400]  through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition
[44:06.400 --> 44:11.200]  people feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that
[44:11.200 --> 44:17.520]  our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[44:17.520 --> 44:22.320]  in a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated
[44:22.320 --> 44:28.480]  young jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logo's radio network gets many requests to endorse
[44:28.480 --> 44:35.040]  all sorts of products most of which we reject we have come to trust jevity so much we became a
[44:35.040 --> 44:41.440]  marketing distributor along with alex jones bin fuchs and many others who you order from logo's
[44:41.440 --> 44:48.320]  radio network dot com your health will improve as you help support quality radio as you realize
[44:48.320 --> 44:54.480]  the benefits of young jevity you may want to join us as a distributor you can experience improved
[44:54.480 --> 45:02.240]  health help your friends and family and increase your income order now are you the plaintiff or
[45:02.240 --> 45:08.720]  defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary the affordable easy
[45:08.720 --> 45:16.960]  to understand four cd course that will show you how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer
[45:16.960 --> 45:22.320]  know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself
[45:23.120 --> 45:29.520]  thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created
[45:29.520 --> 45:36.400]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit
[45:36.400 --> 45:41.760]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[45:41.760 --> 45:48.480]  our american courts you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for
[45:48.480 --> 45:55.760]  civil cases prosa tactics and much more please visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the
[45:55.760 --> 46:08.160]  banner are called toll-free eight six six law easy
[46:08.160 --> 46:18.560]  oh
[46:23.120 --> 46:33.840]  yeah always i must be careful what i'm wishing for when i'm hungry i like to know just what i'm
[46:33.840 --> 46:44.000]  fishing for i ask for much i kind of be no but okay we are back randy kelton wet fountain rule of
[46:44.000 --> 46:50.560]  law radio and britain i've bumped this around over the break and we came to the conclusion
[46:51.680 --> 47:00.400]  that they made a mistake explain that explain that brit well it's just the way it looks to me
[47:00.400 --> 47:09.040]  is that they're assuming that these um documents are going to be sent or and forwarded by hold on
[47:09.040 --> 47:17.440]  magistrate so they probably hold on a second uh chapter 14 is where a person is arrested for
[47:17.440 --> 47:29.120]  an on-site offense chapter 15 is where a person is arrested on a warrant so this is a it seems
[47:29.120 --> 47:37.520]  they're assuming something about a warrant here but look go ahead i wanted to frame the context
[47:37.520 --> 47:43.920]  here is why we think they screwed up yeah just overall this is something that uh it's the context
[47:43.920 --> 47:51.680]  is talking about what magistrates do to get somebody in front of them so that would be a summons
[47:51.680 --> 47:59.280]  or an arrest warrant so this this is the part about the warrant but then 1509 is saying a complaint
[47:59.280 --> 48:05.280]  may be forwarded as provided by 1508 which is talking about a warrant being forwarded
[48:06.240 --> 48:11.520]  well a complaint could be forwarded in that same way it looks like they're probably the
[48:11.520 --> 48:17.520]  legislators here were assuming that this is only going to be led to uh magistrates that do this
[48:17.520 --> 48:26.960]  but they left it open but wait or policemen 2.13 said duties of officer duties of police officers
[48:28.160 --> 48:34.480]  that when they have noted haven't when they when it becomes known to them that a crime has been
[48:34.480 --> 48:43.360]  committed they are to forward a complaint to some magistrate right and i believe that's what they
[48:43.360 --> 48:49.920]  were thinking when they mentioned forwarding they were assuming it was forwarded from a
[48:50.640 --> 48:57.600]  police officer but they didn't say that just said who it gets forwarded to a magistrate
[48:57.600 --> 49:05.840]  it doesn't say who it's forwarded from and the implication of that is read 1509 again
[49:05.840 --> 49:13.120]  a complaint in accordance with 1505 which just describes what makes a complaint sufficient
[49:13.840 --> 49:21.520]  so a complaint may be forwarded as provided by 1508 to any magistrate in the state
[49:21.520 --> 49:27.920]  and the magistrate who receives the same shall forthwith issue a warrant for the arrest of the
[49:27.920 --> 49:36.800]  accused did you used yeah and the accused when arrested shall be dealt with as provided in this
[49:36.800 --> 49:43.440]  chapter in similar cases which i take to mean all that 1517 warnings and examining trial and all that
[49:43.440 --> 49:52.080]  stuff so did you hear any discretion in there zero it said shall forthwith did not say may
[49:52.080 --> 49:59.840]  matter can if he wants to i don't know how i've missed that all these years guys if you're reading
[49:59.840 --> 50:07.520]  through the code and you're missing stuff don't feel bad about it i've been doing this 30 years
[50:08.960 --> 50:17.200]  and you know when brett came on and started after these lawyers uh i thought to myself how the heck
[50:17.200 --> 50:26.880]  did i miss that and i keep finding stuff that i missed and the good part about that is is these
[50:26.880 --> 50:33.120]  public officials out there they've missed just about all of it they don't read these codes they
[50:33.120 --> 50:40.640]  don't study these codes they just do what everybody's been doing i don't know how many magistrates i've
[50:40.640 --> 50:47.200]  gave criminal complaints to and they chose not to do nothing did i do a double negative
[50:49.200 --> 51:00.320]  they chose not to do anything she did not do it but now now i got the code
[51:01.360 --> 51:07.040]  that absolutely commands them to issue a warrant no examining trial no discretion
[51:07.040 --> 51:13.760]  and must issue a warrant so what is my local jp going to do when i take her
[51:14.800 --> 51:19.600]  a criminal complaint against the attorney general of the united states
[51:22.320 --> 51:29.840]  for issuing an order to his fbi agents to go to school board meetings and if anyone says anything
[51:29.840 --> 51:39.680]  against vaccines or masks to there to be arrested and treated as an enemy of the state now i can't
[51:39.680 --> 51:49.760]  go to a school board meeting and speak my mind for fear of being arrested that is witness tampering
[51:49.760 --> 52:01.680]  in retaliation 36 05 30 30 606 penal code now while he was in the washington dc when he did this
[52:03.360 --> 52:10.720]  he issued this order so that it affected me in texas and i was harmed in texas
[52:10.720 --> 52:20.720]  this not in the fed but in the state under state criminal laws and under the federal
[52:20.720 --> 52:30.720]  constitution the state is a sovereign nation and has exclusive jurisdiction over violations
[52:30.720 --> 52:39.440]  of his laws now granted i can claim that this is a federal crime because it denies me in my
[52:39.440 --> 52:48.880]  first amendment right it's both but yeah it's also an act of official oppression 39.03
[52:50.640 --> 52:56.240]  so what's he going to do when people all over the country start filing criminal charges
[52:56.240 --> 53:01.680]  with the local grand jury's now granted most grand juries are not going to indict
[53:01.680 --> 53:09.680]  someone of that stature however we're in texas and we have 254 counties
[53:11.680 --> 53:15.360]  we have some counties down in south texas have less than 100 people in them
[53:17.520 --> 53:24.240]  that's not a lot of people to get converted and especially if you're down there near the
[53:24.240 --> 53:30.160]  border i just had an email from someone that heard her husband who's been calling in for
[53:30.160 --> 53:36.720]  years and having incredible problems with border patrol he just had two neighbors the border patrol
[53:36.720 --> 53:41.280]  stuck guns in their faces and threatened to kill them because they told the border patrol to get
[53:41.280 --> 53:47.120]  heck off their property so that's a county that's really not happy with the federal government
[53:47.120 --> 53:51.280]  what's the likelihood we could get an indictment of the attorney general
[53:51.280 --> 53:58.240]  does that sound like fun bread sounds like your chances to be pretty good
[54:00.480 --> 54:04.640]  and there's the feds would see it coming either you know they're going over here to these
[54:04.640 --> 54:08.800]  school board meetings and they're in their suit and they think they're strutting around showing off
[54:08.800 --> 54:15.920]  how powerful they are and i don't think they would see it coming that uh get in a state
[54:15.920 --> 54:21.360]  where one thing you can do if you see a a couple of feds in a school board meeting
[54:22.560 --> 54:29.760]  you go to the feds and ask them for a copy of their authorization to be operating in the county
[54:32.640 --> 54:38.640]  because a fed may not operate in a county without the permission of the county sheriff
[54:38.640 --> 54:47.040]  our founders were absolutely genius when they put this together they understood the kind of
[54:47.040 --> 54:53.440]  problems we're having right now and they put together a legal structure to be essentially immune
[54:53.440 --> 55:02.560]  from that we don't have a single state police and that was on purpose each county has its own police
[55:02.560 --> 55:11.360]  and essentially each count county in that regard is sovereign the sheriff is sovereign
[55:11.360 --> 55:18.800]  in that county as it goes to who enforces law in his county feds don't come in without his
[55:18.800 --> 55:25.360]  permission when they killed the president in dallas the feds poured in the sheriff threw him out
[55:25.360 --> 55:33.600]  because he can do that so i'm looking at pushing i'm put i'm going to put together
[55:34.160 --> 55:40.240]  a criminal complaint with a nice legal brief attached and then make it available to everybody
[55:42.080 --> 55:45.760]  and see if we can't get a few hundred people filing criminal charges with
[55:46.800 --> 55:54.080]  grand juries all over the state we'll also charge them with misappropriation of public funds if
[55:54.080 --> 56:02.400]  they're doing their if they're not doing their duty i typically find 3903 just tends to line up with
[56:03.440 --> 56:12.800]  uh 30 390 public funds as well 3902 texas has you talking about abuse of office yeah texas has two
[56:12.800 --> 56:21.440]  statutes uh most states only have one called an official misconduct but texas has two 3902
[56:21.440 --> 56:28.800]  goes to a misappropriation of public funds 3903 goes to denying a citizen in a right
[56:30.400 --> 56:31.680]  so we charge them with both
[56:34.640 --> 56:39.120]  yes they're doing if they were doing their job i mean they're they're over there taking a paycheck
[56:39.120 --> 56:47.360]  right yep they're on the clock yep but if we charge them with the the misappropriation of
[56:47.360 --> 56:55.120]  public funds that might push us into the fed or that one by itself might go to the fed because
[56:55.120 --> 57:01.040]  they're not misappropriating state or county funds they're misappropriating federal funds
[57:02.320 --> 57:07.520]  okay but that would be great fun to hammer the local uh us attorney with
[57:10.400 --> 57:13.120]  because they've got a whole process for that guys it's great fun
[57:13.120 --> 57:18.320]  the US attorney is going to try to protect all these buddies he's going to try to he will try to
[57:18.320 --> 57:26.640]  shield the grand jury from you so first you file your complaint with the special agent
[57:26.640 --> 57:32.400]  charge of the local FBI office that's the only name you can get because all of the others hide
[57:32.400 --> 57:40.560]  their names we have secret police now but his name's on the website so you file with him by name
[57:40.560 --> 57:46.400]  and you put a cover letter on it and ask him to send it back to you let you know he got it you'll
[57:46.400 --> 57:55.280]  never get that cover letter and when you don't you file against him with the US attorney i'm sorry
[57:55.280 --> 58:01.280]  with the federal grand jury and you send it to the US attorney's address and you put cover letter
[58:01.280 --> 58:08.160]  on that one and you warn the US the foreman not to sign it because the US attorney has a rubber
[58:08.160 --> 58:12.480]  stamp with your name on it that he uses to rubber stamp super cheating indictments and we want to
[58:12.480 --> 58:17.600]  make sure he didn't rubber stamp this but what do you think the chances are that the foreman's
[58:17.600 --> 58:25.200]  going to get that letter that would be embarrassing and in the next letter the next filing is a criminal
[58:25.200 --> 58:30.240]  complaint against the US attorney for secreting your criminal complaints from the grand jury that's
[58:30.240 --> 58:38.480]  jury tampering yeah for lauderdale US attorney called me and threatened to arrest me for jury
[58:38.480 --> 58:42.400]  tampering and i said you go ahead and i'll go after you for obstruction we'll see how this
[58:42.400 --> 58:52.640]  works out for you hang on we'll be right back would you like to make more definite progress
[58:52.640 --> 58:59.280]  in your walk with god bibles for america is offering a free study bible and a set of free christian
[58:59.280 --> 59:04.160]  books that can really help the new testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive
[59:04.160 --> 59:09.440]  study bibles available today it's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of foot
[59:09.440 --> 59:14.800]  notes that will help you to know god and to know the meaning of life the free books are a three
[59:14.800 --> 59:20.640]  volume set called basic elements of the christian life chapter by chapter basic elements of the
[59:20.640 --> 59:26.720]  christian life clearly presents god's plan of salvation growing in christ and how to build
[59:26.720 --> 59:33.040]  up the church to order your free new testament recovery version and basic elements of the christian
[59:33.040 --> 59:49.040]  life call bibles for america toll free at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org
[59:49.040 --> 59:54.880]  live free speech radio logos radio network dot com
[01:00:00.480 --> 01:00:04.400]  the following is flashed by tibia the long star lowdown
[01:00:06.320 --> 01:00:13.440]  markets for monday the 22nd of july 2019 opened with precious metals gold at $1429 an ounce silver
[01:00:13.440 --> 01:00:23.440]  $16.45 an ounce copper $2.75 an ounce oil texas crude $55.63 a barrel brand crude $62.47 a barrel
[01:00:23.440 --> 01:00:33.760]  and cryptos in order of market cap bitcoin core $10,566.52 ethereum $227.26 xrp ripple 33
[01:00:33.760 --> 01:00:41.440]  cents light coin $100.31 and bitcoin cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin
[01:00:45.920 --> 01:00:52.640]  in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated on
[01:00:52.640 --> 01:00:58.160]  market street in san francisco during the world war one preparedness day parade killing 10 and
[01:00:58.160 --> 01:01:07.360]  entering 40 today in history and recent news since governor greg abbott signed house bill
[01:01:07.360 --> 01:01:13.120]  1325 legalizing heaven attacks his law back in june county prosecutors around the state including
[01:01:13.120 --> 01:01:17.680]  houston austin sandtonia have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing
[01:01:17.680 --> 01:01:22.640]  to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment
[01:01:22.640 --> 01:01:28.000]  to test the earth for thc margaret moore the travis county district attorney announced earlier this
[01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:32.880]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:01:32.880 --> 01:01:37.760]  law mr abbott and other state officials including the attorney general stipulated in a letter that
[01:01:37.760 --> 01:01:42.800]  county district attorneys back on thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in texas
[01:01:42.800 --> 01:01:49.600]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how hb 1325 works as well as other cities too
[01:01:49.600 --> 01:01:56.400]  like the district attorney in alpaso china asparza a democrat who also stated earlier this month that
[01:01:56.400 --> 01:02:02.240]  the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in alpaso however
[01:02:02.240 --> 01:02:07.200]  the issue was succinctly summarized by mr brandon ball an assistant public defender in harris
[01:02:07.200 --> 01:02:11.840]  county who stated that quote the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based
[01:02:11.840 --> 01:02:16.960]  on its chemical makeup it's important that if someone is charged with something the test matches
[01:02:16.960 --> 01:02:25.680]  what they're charged with a paper by tulane university identified a five and a half inch
[01:02:25.680 --> 01:02:31.600]  american pocket shark as the first of its kind in the gulf of mexico the specimen being only the
[01:02:31.600 --> 01:02:37.680]  second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979
[01:02:37.680 --> 01:02:42.160]  in the east pacific ocean according to the university paper the shark secretes a luminous
[01:02:42.160 --> 01:02:48.320]  fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and pray
[01:02:48.320 --> 01:03:12.160]  who may be drawn into the glow this is book roti with a lowdown for july 22nd 2019
[01:03:19.280 --> 01:03:22.160]  these warmers come by left or right
[01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:34.800]  i won't pay for the war with my body ain't gonna pay for the car with my money
[01:03:34.800 --> 01:03:42.880]  i won't pay for the fun with my body the plants wicked and the logic shoddy ain't gonna pay for
[01:03:42.880 --> 01:03:51.680]  the war with my body okay we are back randy kelton brett fountain rule of law radio on this the
[01:03:51.680 --> 01:04:04.000]  eighth day of of what brett eighth of october brett has to bail me out i'm old 2021 i'll get all
[01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:09.280]  those in a minute and we're talking to steve in texas and we kind of bushwhacked you steve and
[01:04:09.280 --> 01:04:18.800]  and used you to lead me into a topic i wanted to address have we addressed your issues or do
[01:04:18.800 --> 01:04:24.800]  you have more questions that we didn't let you get to i enjoyed the bushwhacking
[01:04:26.880 --> 01:04:33.280]  if you had a uh i'd add one one other on the on the issue where we were we went to conspiracy
[01:04:33.280 --> 01:04:40.160]  just the municipal court is working as they uh had that turned into him by
[01:04:43.520 --> 01:04:48.400]  he's a peace he is a peace officer which you know they talked about the people last
[01:04:48.400 --> 01:04:55.360]  second or anything else but their the city is operating a department of public safety i think
[01:04:55.360 --> 01:05:01.040]  i've mentioned to you before that appears nowhere in their charter they reorganized
[01:05:01.040 --> 01:05:12.400]  all of their services such as fire building inspection police and then such into a department
[01:05:12.400 --> 01:05:17.760]  of public safety again which appears nowhere in their charter and appears nowhere in their
[01:05:17.760 --> 01:05:25.040]  ordinances and they're a home real child they could have put it if they want to put it if it's not
[01:05:25.040 --> 01:05:32.880]  in their charter they cannot do it that's what i mean yeah go ahead
[01:05:36.240 --> 01:05:42.400]  i'm looking for a remedy i don't know the remedy and i haven't actually gone down that angle yet
[01:05:43.600 --> 01:05:47.680]  well the remedy for the wife is a challenge subject matter jurisdiction
[01:05:47.680 --> 01:05:59.440]  and you argue that this department of public safety what does it do
[01:06:03.920 --> 01:06:07.440]  i guess they felt the need for efficiency to lump all of their
[01:06:09.600 --> 01:06:15.120]  public safety operations under one umbrella i don't know what to tell you that it doesn't exist
[01:06:15.120 --> 01:06:22.000]  in their charter so i can't really exactly tell you what their purpose is and it's been going on for
[01:06:22.640 --> 01:06:31.680]  about a decade and before this started i was thinking trying to figure out how to get to a
[01:06:31.680 --> 01:06:39.680]  very specific statute and you just gave me the way to get to it are you familiar with Texas
[01:06:39.680 --> 01:06:49.840]  penal code chapter 71 panther down on top of my head it is the street gang statute
[01:06:50.400 --> 01:06:58.080]  texas form of rico they're operating a criminal enterprise
[01:06:58.080 --> 01:07:14.000]  go on a jurors imprudence website go to documents and research and then down to
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:22.800]  november arrest open the lawsuit that i filed against wise counties 137 pages
[01:07:22.800 --> 01:07:34.240]  in there i address i am accusing them of operating a criminal enterprise i got all the case law in
[01:07:34.240 --> 01:07:41.840]  there are you yours you know i'm accusing them of doing this almost exactly the same that they're
[01:07:41.840 --> 01:07:51.920]  doing to you so i'm charging the county with it and i'm claiming that prosecutors advise local
[01:07:51.920 --> 01:07:57.840]  officials to do things that were in violation of law and in the process of doing these things
[01:07:57.840 --> 01:08:05.520]  they collect fines and fees from citizens and that fits the definition of street gang
[01:08:07.040 --> 01:08:13.200]  there is a recognizable hierarchy they participate in a
[01:08:13.200 --> 01:08:22.400]  enterprise and on an ongoing criminal enterprise everybody that participates is liable
[01:08:24.480 --> 01:08:31.680]  and if you if they have a smart lawyer then the smart lawyer will look at it and say
[01:08:31.680 --> 01:08:42.240]  this guy is saying that we're perpetrating predicate acts toward an ongoing criminal conspiracy
[01:08:43.520 --> 01:08:50.800]  that's the definition of federico and if you got a lawyer with with who's on the ball he's
[01:08:50.800 --> 01:09:01.280]  going to say this guy's setting us up for the feds you got a really nice heavy lawsuit you can
[01:09:01.280 --> 01:09:07.520]  bang them with you can claim all of the fines and fees they've collected have been collected
[01:09:07.520 --> 01:09:15.760]  in violation of law and you can demand they pay it all back in triplicate and you can do this
[01:09:15.760 --> 01:09:22.480]  in the form of a private attorney general suit now you've got a bunch of patriot mythologists
[01:09:22.480 --> 01:09:28.160]  out there he said you can be a private attorney general no you can't but what you can do is file
[01:09:28.160 --> 01:09:35.200]  a kind of suit that the courts have accepted let's say you get fine 300 bucks and you get
[01:09:35.200 --> 01:09:44.400]  fine that illegally it's going to cost a fortune to sue them over that the lawyer's going to charge
[01:09:44.400 --> 01:09:51.360]  you 10 grand just to open the door so what the courts have said in matters where the amount
[01:09:51.360 --> 01:09:58.640]  of money is not so high as to make it profitable for a person to attempt to try to adjudicate a
[01:09:58.640 --> 01:10:09.200]  problem and correct it that one person can sue on the behalf of himself and all others similarly
[01:10:09.200 --> 01:10:18.320]  situated so that you stand to collect the harm for all of them because you're the one that brought
[01:10:18.320 --> 01:10:26.640]  the suit and that's to make it so that citizens can address things like this these minor where each
[01:10:26.640 --> 01:10:33.920]  person is not teed it out of such a great amount but over time it becomes a very large amount so
[01:10:37.600 --> 01:10:41.600]  it is not the purpose of my lawsuit to win my case
[01:10:41.600 --> 01:10:49.120]  it's my purpose it's the purpose of my lawsuit to first stick it in the courts
[01:10:51.760 --> 01:11:00.480]  and you need a good cognizable claim so that's why I have 137 pages I've got a brief in there
[01:11:01.840 --> 01:11:08.080]  you need to claim that if that it addresses all the elements and if if it is adjudicated in your
[01:11:08.080 --> 01:11:17.280]  case if it is if the court finds all of this to be true then you would win your case so that
[01:11:17.280 --> 01:11:24.480]  keeps them from being able to knock it out of court for a failure state of claim the other
[01:11:24.480 --> 01:11:33.040]  issue they will go for is immunity now it's not what you can prove that keeps you in court
[01:11:33.040 --> 01:11:41.920]  in terms of immunity it is the nature of your claim so if you claim that these officials
[01:11:41.920 --> 01:11:49.040]  are acting in violation of state law whether that you can prove it or not is not so relevant
[01:11:49.040 --> 01:11:56.560]  it is the nature of the claim that keeps you in court and your claim is that they violated state
[01:11:56.560 --> 01:12:05.600]  law and state law is not within the scope of their authority when an official acts outside of scope
[01:12:06.480 --> 01:12:14.240]  they have zero immunity so this suit go through it read it a couple times
[01:12:16.640 --> 01:12:21.040]  it's just read the whole thing you'll you will have read all my arguments three times
[01:12:21.760 --> 01:12:26.240]  because I start out with the petition for declaratory judgment and you might want to
[01:12:26.240 --> 01:12:33.840]  do that as well I have yet to find a lawyer who knew what a petition for declaratory judgment was
[01:12:35.440 --> 01:12:43.040]  it's a relatively relatively new remedy that was put in place so that you can go to the court and
[01:12:43.040 --> 01:12:54.240]  say I think I have a claim or there is an issue in law here that I needed a determination on
[01:12:54.240 --> 01:13:04.560]  so that if I get a the determination I suspect a suspect or expect I will have a claim but I
[01:13:04.560 --> 01:13:11.680]  don't want to file suit first because it'll cost everybody a lot of money by filing a petition
[01:13:11.680 --> 01:13:17.920]  for declaratory judgment you're just asking the court to give you a ruling on a point of law
[01:13:17.920 --> 01:13:32.000]  law and in this case the point of law is may the municipality do something that's not in their
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:42.960]  charter it's an obvious gotcha yes it is and when you file that one they're gonna file a
[01:13:42.960 --> 01:13:50.320]  motion to dismiss fair state claim because they don't know any better and this will keep get you
[01:13:50.320 --> 01:13:56.640]  in the court past the front door now you get to go to discovery and that's the place they do not
[01:13:56.640 --> 01:14:03.200]  want to go is discovery so the petition for declaratory judgment will lock you in the court
[01:14:04.800 --> 01:14:10.000]  and then you can use discovery to beat them up with to the point that they're going to want to pay
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:16.800]  you a lot of money to get you to go away and leave them alone the purpose is not to try to win the
[01:14:16.800 --> 01:14:23.440]  case at the end of the day something like this would be one of those cases that would disrupt
[01:14:23.440 --> 01:14:32.320]  everything and they are not going to want it to get to the higher courts so you start the case
[01:14:32.320 --> 01:14:39.520]  and then you use some of my pro say from hell tools mine and brett's you start beat beating them up
[01:14:39.520 --> 01:14:45.760]  the bar grievances judiciary conduct complaints teacole complaints against the officers just
[01:14:45.760 --> 01:14:52.080]  to hammer them with everything you can find make their lives misery miserable you will get rid of
[01:14:52.080 --> 01:14:58.080]  two or three law firms because you'll bar grieve them into the stone age you'll make criminal
[01:14:58.080 --> 01:15:04.000]  accusations against all of them all over the place every time they move and finally the mayor will
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:11.040]  tell them do something to get this guy off our backs we do not want this to go to the corner
[01:15:11.040 --> 01:15:21.440]  of appeals and they're making an offer at the end of the day the only way we're going to get their
[01:15:21.440 --> 01:15:28.880]  attention is to get in their pocketbook so taking a deal is not selling out this is how we'll beat
[01:15:28.880 --> 01:15:34.320]  them if we fight them all the way to the the higher courts the higher courts are going to
[01:15:34.320 --> 01:15:41.360]  scroll us out the court of appeals is likely to rule against us no matter what and then the supreme
[01:15:41.360 --> 01:15:52.320]  will refuse to pick up your shirt and your screwed make them pay you and then go to rule our radio
[01:15:52.320 --> 01:16:02.160]  and donate to Randy's beer fund okay that's you have a good you have a good case here
[01:16:03.840 --> 01:16:09.840]  I've got volumes and you guys with the with the open government request you entered this
[01:16:09.840 --> 01:16:15.760]  with two years ago I've gotten volumes of information out of them so far where they're
[01:16:15.760 --> 01:16:23.200]  either contradict yourself or I get one piece of the puzzle no you don't say no wait wait wait
[01:16:23.200 --> 01:16:31.200]  wait you can't come on my show and imply that a public official would lie to you or contradict
[01:16:31.200 --> 01:16:42.800]  himself that is careless aren't you ashamed of yourself that's a third-degree felony every time
[01:16:42.800 --> 01:16:49.040]  they forgot to put it on the government record too wonderful hang on Randy Kelton Brett
[01:16:49.040 --> 01:17:05.520]  fountain we'll roll radio I'm not gonna give us calling number our call boards for we'll be right back
[01:17:05.520 --> 01:17:22.480]  with the Michael mirrors proven method Michael mirrors has won six cases in federal court against
[01:17:22.480 --> 01:17:38.480]  phones mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt collectors out of
[01:17:38.480 --> 01:17:54.480]  personal consultation is available as well for more information please visit rule of law radio
[01:17:54.480 --> 01:18:24.000]  M I R R A S at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now I love logos without the shows on this network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back I need my truth pick I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air and I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because i spent it all on supplement how can I help logos well I'm glad you asked
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:28.440]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies
[01:18:28.440 --> 01:18:29.440]  or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.440 --> 01:18:31.640]  The first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.640 --> 01:18:37.760]  Now, go to LogosRegulnetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.760 --> 01:18:43.600]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.600 --> 01:18:44.600]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.600 --> 01:18:45.600]  No.
[01:18:45.600 --> 01:18:47.360]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.360 --> 01:18:48.360]  No.
[01:18:48.360 --> 01:18:49.360]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.360 --> 01:18:50.360]  No.
[01:18:50.360 --> 01:18:51.360]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.360 --> 01:18:52.360]  Wow.
[01:18:52.360 --> 01:18:54.360]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.360 --> 01:18:55.360]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.360 --> 01:18:56.360]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.360 --> 01:18:57.360]  We are Logos.
[01:18:57.360 --> 01:18:58.360]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:58.360 --> 01:18:59.360]  Logos.
[01:18:59.360 --> 01:19:00.360]  Logos.
[01:19:00.360 --> 01:19:01.360]  Radio.
[01:19:01.360 --> 01:19:02.360]  Net.
[01:19:02.360 --> 01:19:03.360]  Radio.
[01:19:03.360 --> 01:19:04.360]  Net.
[01:19:04.360 --> 01:19:05.360]  Radio.
[01:19:05.360 --> 01:19:06.360]  Radio.
[01:19:06.360 --> 01:19:07.360]  Radio.
[01:19:07.360 --> 01:19:08.360]  Radio.
[01:19:08.360 --> 01:19:09.360]  Radio.
[01:19:09.360 --> 01:19:10.360]  Radio.
[01:19:10.360 --> 01:19:11.360]  Radio.
[01:19:11.360 --> 01:19:12.360]  Radio.
[01:19:12.360 --> 01:19:13.360]  Radio.
[01:19:13.360 --> 01:19:14.360]  Radio.
[01:19:14.360 --> 01:19:15.360]  Radio.
[01:19:15.360 --> 01:19:16.360]  Radio.
[01:19:16.360 --> 01:19:17.360]  Radio.
[01:19:17.360 --> 01:19:18.360]  Radio.
[01:19:18.360 --> 01:19:19.360]  Radio.
[01:19:19.360 --> 01:19:20.360]  Radio.
[01:19:20.360 --> 01:19:21.360]  Radio.
[01:19:21.360 --> 01:19:22.360]  Radio.
[01:19:22.360 --> 01:19:23.360]  Radio.
[01:19:23.360 --> 01:19:24.360]  Radio.
[01:19:24.360 --> 01:19:25.360]  Radio.
[01:19:25.360 --> 01:19:26.360]  Radio.
[01:19:26.360 --> 01:19:27.360]  Radio.
[01:19:27.360 --> 01:19:28.360]  Radio.
[01:19:28.360 --> 01:19:29.360]  Radio.
[01:19:29.360 --> 01:19:30.360]  Radio.
[01:19:30.360 --> 01:19:31.360]  Radio.
[01:19:31.360 --> 01:19:32.360]  Radio.
[01:19:32.360 --> 01:19:33.360]  Radio.
[01:19:33.360 --> 01:19:34.360]  Radio.
[01:19:34.360 --> 01:19:35.360]  Radio.
[01:19:35.360 --> 01:19:36.360]  Radio.
[01:19:36.360 --> 01:19:37.360]  Radio.
[01:19:37.360 --> 01:19:38.360]  Radio.
[01:19:38.360 --> 01:19:39.360]  Radio.
[01:19:39.360 --> 01:19:40.360]  Radio.
[01:19:40.360 --> 01:19:41.360]  Radio.
[01:19:41.360 --> 01:19:42.360]  Radio.
[01:19:42.360 --> 01:19:43.360]  Radio.
[01:19:43.360 --> 01:19:44.360]  Radio.
[01:19:44.360 --> 01:19:45.360]  Radio.
[01:19:45.360 --> 01:19:46.360]  Radio.
[01:19:46.360 --> 01:19:47.360]  Radio.
[01:19:47.360 --> 01:19:48.360]  Radio.
[01:19:48.360 --> 01:19:51.360]  With that same old trick again
[01:19:55.360 --> 01:19:57.360]  I ain't gonna hold you
[01:20:11.360 --> 01:20:16.360]  I ain't gonna drive me with that same old sucker punch
[01:20:16.360 --> 01:20:21.360]  I get it now, but then I must have it now too
[01:20:21.360 --> 01:20:26.360]  Back then you had room to move, but now you're feeling the crunch
[01:20:26.360 --> 01:20:31.360]  Ain't gonna get me with that same old sucker punch
[01:20:31.360 --> 01:20:37.360] ...
[01:20:44.360 --> 01:20:46.360]  Okay, we are back
[01:20:46.360 --> 01:20:49.360]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, wood of low radio
[01:20:49.360 --> 01:20:52.360]  And we were talkin' to Steve
[01:20:52.360 --> 01:20:54.360]  But Steve looks like we lost him
[01:20:54.360 --> 01:20:58.360]  I guess he thought being scurrilous
[01:20:58.360 --> 01:21:10.100]  us must've heard his fevers. Maybe not. Okay, we're going to E.J. in California. I should've
[01:21:10.100 --> 01:21:16.120]  went to her first because she called in last night and we didn't get to her. Hello E.J.
[01:21:16.120 --> 01:21:30.080]  Hello. What do you have for us today? Tell me you're having a lot of fun. Yeah, I guess
[01:21:30.080 --> 01:21:38.280]  after I see some things happening after the complaints and so forth, but right now I got
[01:21:38.280 --> 01:21:50.120]  the speed letter and I got the police report. So it looks like the detective made a statement
[01:21:50.120 --> 01:21:57.280]  under penalty of perjury. I have it right in front of me. Wow, you know, she really
[01:21:57.280 --> 01:22:06.600]  made a lot of stuff up which didn't happen. She's the only one who saw the surveillance
[01:22:06.600 --> 01:22:19.480]  footage at the hospital. And she resigned from the police force last May and she's out
[01:22:19.480 --> 01:22:27.360]  of state. According to the emails that I'm reading. Oh, you get to bring her back into
[01:22:27.360 --> 01:22:35.400]  the state. Oh my gosh, music to my ears. Okay, thank you. Really, I just like, I don't even
[01:22:35.400 --> 01:22:43.400]  know where she lives though. It doesn't matter. They'll have to tell you. She's ex-police
[01:22:43.400 --> 01:22:52.920]  officer, so do you have any idea why she left? No, just according to emails, they were trying
[01:22:52.920 --> 01:23:00.720]  to get the footage that's what I was asked for in the open public act and I can tell
[01:23:00.720 --> 01:23:07.440]  that like four or five people are asking, do we have it? No, the detective clinic never
[01:23:07.440 --> 01:23:13.400]  got it because they want to see a warrant. I don't know what a warrant is. I mean, why
[01:23:13.400 --> 01:23:19.560]  would you need a warrant? Wait, wait, wait, who wants to see a warrant? The hospital in
[01:23:19.560 --> 01:23:26.960]  order to give out the surveillance footage. Everyone lied. Wow, it's unbelievable. It
[01:23:26.960 --> 01:23:36.040]  is really unbelievable. Okay, okay, listen, that's good. That's good. Yeah, that's right.
[01:23:36.040 --> 01:23:45.680]  They know they lied. Alex Jones once did a video about Williamson County. He's sitting
[01:23:45.680 --> 01:23:52.120]  in a car on a ridge and the cameraman is in the passenger seat shooting past him down
[01:23:52.120 --> 01:23:58.600]  into this valley and Alex Jones points out the window and he says, that's Williamson
[01:23:58.600 --> 01:24:06.880]  County, the most corrupt county in Texas and he went on to say how he would not even drive
[01:24:06.880 --> 01:24:12.760]  through that county. Interstate 35 goes right through Williamson County and he goes around
[01:24:12.760 --> 01:24:21.160]  it. He won't drive in the county. Well, I went to Williamson County and a friend of mine
[01:24:21.160 --> 01:24:31.800]  had gotten a ticket for two prescription pills in an aspirin bottle. He brought them the prescription
[01:24:31.800 --> 01:24:35.520]  and they're still prosecuting him. So I went down there with him and he's going to see
[01:24:35.520 --> 01:24:43.280]  the prosecutor and I told him, him and Steve and I told him, you two don't know anything
[01:24:43.280 --> 01:24:49.800]  about me. So they went to see him and I went up to the clerk and asked to see his file.
[01:24:49.800 --> 01:24:53.880]  And like I expected, I didn't find a criminal complaint in there and I called the clerk
[01:24:53.880 --> 01:24:59.840]  over and I said something's missing. I'm in a nice suit and I don't tell him who I am.
[01:24:59.840 --> 01:25:05.800]  I just tell him what I want. And the clerk said, can I ask who you are? No, just go get
[01:25:05.800 --> 01:25:12.080]  my records. Okay, so he goes get the records. I don't find a criminal complaint and I said,
[01:25:12.080 --> 01:25:18.080]  there's something missing. Well, this is all we get. I don't care what all you get. Something's
[01:25:18.080 --> 01:25:23.560]  missing. There's no criminal accusation in here. Nobody ever accused this guy of a crime.
[01:25:23.560 --> 01:25:31.240]  How in the heck did you initiate a prosecution in your court without anybody ever accusing
[01:25:31.240 --> 01:25:38.200]  him of a crime? Well, this is how we do it. You need to go get your boss and he was just
[01:25:38.200 --> 01:25:44.200]  the boss. And I asked him, what's the criminal complaint he is in? Well, I think the prosecutor
[01:25:44.200 --> 01:25:49.800]  has it. Don't go anywhere. I'll be right back. I go to the prosecutor's office and I
[01:25:49.800 --> 01:25:53.880]  file an information request demanding all records collected simply maintained by the
[01:25:53.880 --> 01:26:02.640]  department that are specifically referenced by article 17.30 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:26:02.640 --> 01:26:11.000]  And what that is, it says after a magistrate holds an examining trial, he is to seal all
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:17.200]  documents had in the hearing in an envelope, cause his name to be written across the seal
[01:26:17.200 --> 01:26:24.240]  of the envelope and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. Statute commands
[01:26:24.240 --> 01:26:31.440]  it be sent to the clerk. The clerk doesn't have it. So I give that to the county attorney's
[01:26:31.440 --> 01:26:42.600]  office and they send out this female ADA. She looked like a stripper. Stripper heels,
[01:26:42.600 --> 01:26:49.760]  miniskirt, low cut dressed, big hooters. And you know, I'm a guy and I appreciate a hot-looking
[01:26:49.760 --> 01:27:00.320]  babe like any other guy. But I was offended. Do you really think I will be manipulated
[01:27:00.320 --> 01:27:09.120]  by this young girl because she's got, she's hot? I'm a grandpa. I don't do that anymore.
[01:27:09.120 --> 01:27:13.920]  So I was offended. And she said, Mr. Kelton, I read through your complaint and I'm not
[01:27:13.920 --> 01:27:22.320]  sure what you're asking for. Can you clarify? Oh, absolutely. I want to see exactly what
[01:27:22.320 --> 01:27:29.920]  I asked for. If you have a problem understanding what it is, don't ask me. Go to the legislature.
[01:27:29.920 --> 01:27:36.840]  He stopped off in a half. So I went in the courtroom. I sat down in the courtroom and
[01:27:36.840 --> 01:27:40.160]  asked the bailiff what the judge's name was because I didn't have my glasses and I couldn't
[01:27:40.160 --> 01:27:46.760]  read it. And asked for a appearance docket and he told me where I could go get it. Well,
[01:27:46.760 --> 01:27:50.640]  they're having one of these cattle calls where they're bringing people in trying to make
[01:27:50.640 --> 01:27:55.200]  a deal. They're all bringing them in and jailed uniforms. And I'm sitting there taking
[01:27:55.200 --> 01:28:03.440]  notes in the front row and I'm in a nice suit. And this young ADA comes over. Black suit.
[01:28:03.440 --> 01:28:11.040]  Solid black suit, solid black shirt, red satin tie. I thought he, you know, I got the impression
[01:28:11.040 --> 01:28:16.320]  he thought he was in the mafia. And that was probably appropriate for that county. And
[01:28:16.320 --> 01:28:20.640]  he said, sir, sir, and I looked up at him. I'm sitting right in the front row. I said,
[01:28:20.640 --> 01:28:26.120]  sir, do you have a case in this court today? Oh, no, nothing like that. And I went back
[01:28:26.120 --> 01:28:33.680]  to writing. He stands there a few seconds and then he said, sir, sir, and I said, yes,
[01:28:33.680 --> 01:28:37.600]  do you have a civil case in this court? No, no, no, nothing like that. I went back to
[01:28:37.600 --> 01:28:42.680]  writing and ignored him. He stood there a minute and said, sir, sir, and I looked up
[01:28:42.680 --> 01:28:49.120]  at him, held up both hands with my palms out and said, no more questions. I went back to
[01:28:49.120 --> 01:28:53.840]  writing. I could see him in my peripheral vision kind of shuffling around a little bit.
[01:28:53.840 --> 01:28:59.400]  And then he left. A little while later, this older guy came out who was obviously the elected
[01:28:59.400 --> 01:29:06.760]  county attorney. He leaned over the bar and said, sir, sir, and I said, yes. He told me
[01:29:06.760 --> 01:29:11.840]  where I could go to get a copy of the parents' document. I said, yeah, I know the debate
[01:29:11.840 --> 01:29:16.600]  is over there. He told me that. Thank you very much. And I go back to writing. Sir, sir,
[01:29:16.600 --> 01:29:22.200]  and he, I said, yes, sir, if you need anything, just let me know and I can help you with it.
[01:29:22.200 --> 01:29:30.640]  I said, if I need you, I will summon you. You're dismissed. Let go back to writing.
[01:29:30.640 --> 01:29:38.040]  We left. I left a little later and Doug came to me and he said, what did you do? I just
[01:29:38.040 --> 01:29:44.040]  jerked around a little bit. They dismissed his case. They took him to the judge and got
[01:29:44.040 --> 01:29:48.800]  the judge to sign the order. They took him to the clerk and got, and filled out the paperwork.
[01:29:48.800 --> 01:29:55.800]  He got his bond back the next day. And when we come back from a break, I'll tell you what
[01:29:55.800 --> 01:30:02.000]  happened just after that. Randy Helton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:07.480]  Sorry, soft drink lovers. Even diet drinks can make you fat. A new study shows that diet
[01:30:07.480 --> 01:30:12.000]  soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff. I've got your camera
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:17.400]  on, Brett, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:30:17.400 --> 01:30:21.760]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:30:21.760 --> 01:30:27.360]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.360 --> 01:30:33.520]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:33.520 --> 01:30:38.640]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.640 --> 01:30:45.160]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and VIN. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.160 --> 01:30:51.480]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong. Researchers
[01:30:51.480 --> 01:30:56.480]  at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade. They found
[01:30:56.480 --> 01:31:01.520]  that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no
[01:31:01.520 --> 01:31:06.720]  soda at all. The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike
[01:31:06.720 --> 01:31:11.720]  regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it. Waking up hunger without satisfying
[01:31:11.720 --> 01:31:17.120]  it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake. So use natural
[01:31:17.120 --> 01:31:20.960]  sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the
[01:31:20.960 --> 01:31:26.320]  sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and
[01:31:26.320 --> 01:31:33.680]  information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper
[01:31:33.680 --> 01:31:37.520]  that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it
[01:31:37.520 --> 01:31:43.080]  down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.080 --> 01:31:47.080]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:47.080 --> 01:31:51.120]  force respond to supply. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a
[01:31:51.120 --> 01:31:55.000]  New York City correction office. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:32:20.000]  They're Americans, and we deserve the true. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  RememberBuilding7.org is a great way to help you understand what you're doing, and how
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:37.400]  to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:37.400 --> 01:32:41.480]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll
[01:32:41.480 --> 01:32:45.480]  receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[01:32:45.480 --> 01:32:50.080]  and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource
[01:32:50.080 --> 01:32:54.800]  material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.800 --> 01:33:03.080]  Order your copy today, and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:03.080 --> 01:33:19.120]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:19.120 --> 01:33:48.960]  The way you come with temptation, they're trying to buy the whole place. They want to
[01:33:48.960 --> 01:34:02.280]  get you.
[01:34:02.280 --> 01:34:08.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and we're talking to EJ
[01:34:08.040 --> 01:34:15.280]  in California. And we had a really good discussion on the break with Brett, and now I have no
[01:34:15.280 --> 01:34:25.320]  idea where we were at. I hate it when that happens. I was going to finish something.
[01:34:25.320 --> 01:34:33.600]  Oh yeah, okay, Williamson County. It's a real good point here. The prosecutor came to him
[01:34:33.600 --> 01:34:39.120]  and said, are you here with someone else? No, just me and Steve. Someone's looking through
[01:34:39.120 --> 01:34:45.360]  your records. And Doug told him, I told you I had a top secret clearance and you were
[01:34:45.360 --> 01:34:51.120]  going to screw it up. Now they think I'm a fed. So they said, well, Mr. Bill, what do
[01:34:51.120 --> 01:34:56.780]  you want? I want you to drop this case. Okay, we will do that. Anything else? Well, I'd
[01:34:56.780 --> 01:35:00.240]  like to get an order signed by the judge. They took him to the judge to judge sign the
[01:35:00.240 --> 01:35:05.920]  order. Anything else? I'd like to get my bond money back. They took him to the clerks. He
[01:35:05.920 --> 01:35:11.960]  filled out the paperwork. He got the bond money back the next day. A few days later,
[01:35:11.960 --> 01:35:17.400]  I was doing a presentation of Brave New Books in Austin. And that was the gathering place
[01:35:17.400 --> 01:35:24.720]  for all of the Liberty Forum people. And he came to the presentation and he asked to speak.
[01:35:24.720 --> 01:35:29.880]  And he got up and told what happened. And he said, have you ever walked in a room, turned
[01:35:29.880 --> 01:35:40.960]  on a light and watched the cockroaches scatter? He said that's what it was like. So what happened?
[01:35:40.960 --> 01:35:49.160]  If I went to a county that was doing everything right, that was following the law, they would
[01:35:49.160 --> 01:35:55.840]  not be the least bit impressed by me. But I went to what Alex Jones considered the most
[01:35:55.840 --> 01:36:04.480]  corrupt county in the state. And they don't know who I am. And I'm not telling them. And
[01:36:04.480 --> 01:36:08.080]  I'm ordering them around like they're Aaron Stepp children. They're wondering who the
[01:36:08.080 --> 01:36:17.440]  heck is this guy? And every one of them knew that I was after them. And they all in their
[01:36:17.440 --> 01:36:25.560]  mind ran home to their deepest, darkest closet and looked in there at their worst skeleton
[01:36:25.560 --> 01:36:36.320]  and they knew that's what I was after. The more corrupted jurisdiction is, the more vulnerable
[01:36:36.320 --> 01:36:46.360]  they are. It sounds like a contradiction, but that's the way it really works. So UJ,
[01:36:46.360 --> 01:36:52.600]  the more the corrupt these guys try to be, the better for you. I would want to know why
[01:36:52.600 --> 01:37:03.320]  this police officer who was doing this investigation left the department and left the state. I would
[01:37:03.320 --> 01:37:12.640]  want to see her personnel file. You want to see all complaints filed against her. I think
[01:37:12.640 --> 01:37:21.840]  in California, the agency that certifies peace officers is post, police officer certification
[01:37:21.840 --> 01:37:27.320]  training. That's what it is in most state. And I think that's what it is in California.
[01:37:27.320 --> 01:37:34.600]  So contact them and ask them for all of the professional conduct complaints filed against
[01:37:34.600 --> 01:37:41.200]  this officer. Complete training records for this officer. You don't care if you get it
[01:37:41.200 --> 01:37:50.880]  or not. When you come in there and start digging around in what they consider their records,
[01:37:50.880 --> 01:37:59.360]  they are dirty. And if they're in California, they're dirty by definition. Now they're
[01:37:59.360 --> 01:38:05.720]  going to get worried that you're going to find something they don't want you to see.
[01:38:05.720 --> 01:38:11.400]  That's how you bring them to the table. You push them to drop your complaints. You just
[01:38:11.400 --> 01:38:21.640]  have to make a nuisance of yourself. But it's strategic. You don't care what information
[01:38:21.640 --> 01:38:28.960]  you're asking for. How do you get them to wonder what you're looking for? It's all
[01:38:28.960 --> 01:38:36.400]  politics. Law and the facts don't matter. It's all politics. So what are the weaknesses
[01:38:36.400 --> 01:38:42.600]  of this jurisdiction? What problems have they had? What suits have been filed against them?
[01:38:42.600 --> 01:38:48.280]  If you can find any suits against this jurisdiction, they will give you absolute gyms to beat these
[01:38:48.280 --> 01:38:49.280]  guys up with.
[01:38:49.280 --> 01:38:50.280]  Okay.
[01:38:50.280 --> 01:38:51.280]  That makes sense.
[01:38:51.280 --> 01:38:52.280]  That makes sense.
[01:38:52.280 --> 01:38:53.280]  And ask for...
[01:38:53.280 --> 01:38:54.280]  Yeah.
[01:38:54.280 --> 01:39:04.440]  Yeah. I'm not saying the one thing in particular. I'm saying get a mindset. How can I make them
[01:39:04.440 --> 01:39:08.000]  think that I'm looking behind the curtains?
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:18.960]  You really just to be fun. You'll be amazed at the nuggets you'll find.
[01:39:18.960 --> 01:39:27.280]  I do take this back because it says this period court of Justice Center, County of and State
[01:39:27.280 --> 01:39:35.840]  of California, declaration in court of arrest warrant made under 2015.5 CCP. So she's saying
[01:39:35.840 --> 01:39:43.160]  that she's employed as a police detective. She investigates allegations that I did these
[01:39:43.160 --> 01:39:48.560]  two assault batteries. But she didn't sign it. Appian signature. I'm looking at a go...
[01:39:48.560 --> 01:39:54.920]  I thought she signed it, but I'm looking at the papers. She didn't sign it. Randy, she
[01:39:54.920 --> 01:39:55.920]  didn't sign them.
[01:39:55.920 --> 01:40:02.560]  If it's not signed, it is rough scratchy toilet paper.
[01:40:02.560 --> 01:40:15.840]  It's not executed. The document has no weight. And you can raise an objection to it. But
[01:40:15.840 --> 01:40:22.480]  I would not be so quick if she's made misstatements in the document.
[01:40:22.480 --> 01:40:33.880]  First, you want to raise the issue that this document is filled with misstatements. And
[01:40:33.880 --> 01:40:43.520]  you want to depose this officer or this person. Where is she? If they say she's not a peace
[01:40:43.520 --> 01:40:50.360]  officer anymore, then she's fair game. You can hire a private investigator and they can
[01:40:50.360 --> 01:40:56.040]  look in computers you can't look in and probably for $25, $50, I'll tell you where she's at.
[01:40:56.040 --> 01:41:02.640]  There are online tools, but those online tools are restricted in a way that private investigators
[01:41:02.640 --> 01:41:12.320]  are not. So $50 or so, they'll give you everything you want to know about this person. And then
[01:41:12.320 --> 01:41:24.760]  you ask the court, most states have pre-litigation discovery. In Texas, it's, Texas rules a
[01:41:24.760 --> 01:41:34.080]  civil procedure, 202. Texas has wide open discovery, but most states will only allow
[01:41:34.080 --> 01:41:39.880]  you to do depositions. Now, depositions can get expensive, especially if they're out
[01:41:39.880 --> 01:41:52.320]  of state, but you don't have to do the deposition. Make deposition noises. Notify the jurisdiction
[01:41:52.320 --> 01:42:01.160]  that you want to depose this person. Ask him, where is she? Go ahead.
[01:42:01.160 --> 01:42:08.920]  Even though this case has been dismissed? Oh, yeah. You're doing pre-litigation discovery.
[01:42:08.920 --> 01:42:14.440]  You're going to sue them. The fact that it's been dismissed opens the door. That indicates
[01:42:14.440 --> 01:42:22.000]  that it wasn't proper. Okay, got it. Pre-litigation discovery. Got it. Okay. I got it.
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:26.840]  It's a different case. It's the same fact set, but you're turning the tables on them.
[01:42:26.840 --> 01:42:32.760]  It was a different case. And this goes to the one thing we keep saying, the best fight
[01:42:32.760 --> 01:42:42.080]  to have is the one you picked. So now they've had their fun, your turn. Now you're down
[01:42:42.080 --> 01:42:50.680]  there sharp shooting them. And every, the more you tell them, the less impact what you're
[01:42:50.680 --> 01:42:56.000]  doing will have. But if you come in sharp shooting them and they don't know what you're
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:02.680]  doing, when you tell them you want to do pre-litigation discovery and depose this officer,
[01:43:02.680 --> 01:43:07.280]  they're going to start wondering, why is she doing this? Why is she doing this? And they
[01:43:07.280 --> 01:43:15.640]  will imagine absolutely the worst possible scenario. And then what they're likely to
[01:43:15.640 --> 01:43:23.800]  do is try to interfere with you. And when they do that, now you get complaints and get
[01:43:23.800 --> 01:43:28.360]  claims against them. Oh my goodness. She's going to find out about those
[01:43:28.360 --> 01:43:33.760]  bribes in 2019 or 2020. Oh my goodness. She's going to find out about what happened with
[01:43:33.760 --> 01:43:44.920]  the DA. Oh boy. Exactly. So as you press them, you want them softened up for when you file
[01:43:44.920 --> 01:43:52.240]  suit against them. So they're going to want to make you a deal you can't pass up. And
[01:43:52.240 --> 01:43:56.440]  once you sue them, what they'll do is that you'll ask what you do when you, once you
[01:43:56.440 --> 01:44:00.720]  sue them, you put together your suit and you want it as a, as a match.
[01:44:00.720 --> 01:44:06.720]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.720 --> 01:44:11.480]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.480 --> 01:44:17.760]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.760 --> 01:44:23.520]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young jevity can
[01:44:23.520 --> 01:44:29.040]  provide the nutrients you need. Logo Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts
[01:44:29.040 --> 01:44:34.960]  of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young jevity so much. We became
[01:44:34.960 --> 01:44:40.680]  a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order
[01:44:40.680 --> 01:44:47.720]  from LogoRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.720 --> 01:44:53.200]  As you realize the benefits of young jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[01:44:53.200 --> 01:44:59.240]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:59.240 --> 01:45:04.400]  Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.400 --> 01:45:11.160]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:11.160 --> 01:45:17.840]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer
[01:45:17.840 --> 01:45:23.640]  should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands
[01:45:23.640 --> 01:45:29.600]  have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[01:45:29.600 --> 01:45:36.640]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:36.640 --> 01:45:41.680]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[01:45:41.680 --> 01:45:48.320]  our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[01:45:48.320 --> 01:45:55.600]  for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click
[01:45:55.600 --> 01:46:21.600]  on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:21.600 --> 01:46:49.600]  Thank you.
[01:46:51.600 --> 01:46:57.600]  I remember what was our wrong points on the past before
[01:46:57.600 --> 01:47:01.600]  So shall we read
[01:47:01.600 --> 01:47:04.600]  Wait, wait a minute, Brett you went too fast
[01:47:04.600 --> 01:47:08.600]  Brett was supposed to tell me what we were talking about when I went out
[01:47:08.600 --> 01:47:17.600]  And you were talking about stacking up this record request just as obnoxious as you can be
[01:47:17.600 --> 01:47:20.600]  Oh, that's right, I should remember I'm obnoxious
[01:47:20.600 --> 01:47:23.600]  Because I really like being Scarless
[01:47:23.600 --> 01:47:27.600]  Scarless, I forgot Scarless, and Cherlish, Cherish
[01:47:27.600 --> 01:47:32.600]  Tina, if you're listening, this is, Cherlish is dedicated to you
[01:47:32.600 --> 01:47:38.600]  Tina Cobruk, she calls in regular and she speaks with a strange foreign accent
[01:47:38.600 --> 01:47:41.600]  We've been trying to get her to learn English
[01:47:41.600 --> 01:47:47.600]  She's from, what is it, London? Just south of London?
[01:47:47.600 --> 01:47:51.600]  She's trying to get us to learn English
[01:47:51.600 --> 01:47:56.600]  Anyway, she's teaching us cool words and Cherlish was one of them
[01:47:56.600 --> 01:48:00.600]  Okay, back on point
[01:48:00.600 --> 01:48:08.600]  The more corrupt a jurisdiction is, the more afraid they will be
[01:48:08.600 --> 01:48:13.600]  If I go into a jurisdiction where they're doing everything right
[01:48:13.600 --> 01:48:20.600]  And I do all my huffing and puffing and waving my arms and railing and racist indignation
[01:48:20.600 --> 01:48:23.600]  They will not be impressed
[01:48:23.600 --> 01:48:28.600]  But the more corrupt they are, the more terrified they will be
[01:48:28.600 --> 01:48:31.600]  It's an interesting contradiction
[01:48:31.600 --> 01:48:40.600]  So, EJ, if you think from that perspective
[01:48:40.600 --> 01:48:48.600]  Look at their jurisdiction, where are they likely to be the most vulnerable?
[01:48:48.600 --> 01:48:53.600]  You know, I say, you can never expect to win your case
[01:48:53.600 --> 01:48:57.600]  Simply because you have the law and the facts on your side
[01:48:57.600 --> 01:49:01.600]  You can expect to win your case if you have the politics on your side
[01:49:01.600 --> 01:49:07.600]  And all politics is local, so what is the local politics?
[01:49:07.600 --> 01:49:13.600]  Who is running for re-election? Who has gotten in trouble lately?
[01:49:13.600 --> 01:49:19.600]  Where can you find a soft spot to sting them?
[01:49:19.600 --> 01:49:23.600]  It gets to be an art form
[01:49:23.600 --> 01:49:28.600]  It's not just, you know, Brett and I, we spat all these codes
[01:49:28.600 --> 01:49:35.600]  But what most people don't recognize is we spat the same codes over and over and over and over and over and over
[01:49:35.600 --> 01:49:40.600]  So, we can spat these codes quickly and that's what we've done a hundred times
[01:49:40.600 --> 01:49:45.600]  That's because there aren't that many codes that we deal with
[01:49:45.600 --> 01:49:49.600]  And with you, there's not going to be that many codes
[01:49:49.600 --> 01:49:53.600]  The real thing that matters is the politics
[01:49:53.600 --> 01:49:58.600]  Forget about the codes, don't worry about the codes, any code you need we can find
[01:49:58.600 --> 01:50:03.600]  Look at the politics of what's going on, this is a chess game
[01:50:03.600 --> 01:50:08.600]  Here are their weak points and then we'll craft some maneuvers
[01:50:08.600 --> 01:50:12.600]  Not to go directly for their weak points
[01:50:12.600 --> 01:50:20.600]  But to get them to think that we're going for their weak points and trying to hide it from them
[01:50:20.600 --> 01:50:26.600]  They'll always think of something much, much worse than we could come up with
[01:50:26.600 --> 01:50:29.600]  It's the way the human mind works
[01:50:29.600 --> 01:50:35.600]  So, you're kind of in the driver's seat now EJ, now you can begin to have fun
[01:50:35.600 --> 01:50:36.600]  Okay
[01:50:36.600 --> 01:50:38.600]  Does that make sense?
[01:50:38.600 --> 01:50:46.600]  Yes, it's a higher level looking down, so I really appreciate it, thank you so much
[01:50:46.600 --> 01:50:54.600]  I'm really into the details right now, but really you're absolutely correct
[01:50:54.600 --> 01:50:56.600]  It's really politics
[01:50:56.600 --> 01:51:01.600]  Any of this doesn't really matter, it's just whole thing, it's just all lies
[01:51:01.600 --> 01:51:07.600]  This will tell you what details to look for, details you might not have thought of
[01:51:07.600 --> 01:51:15.600]  Once you, you're past them coming after you, so you're not under that gun anymore
[01:51:15.600 --> 01:51:20.600]  Now, they ain't got to look back to you and wonder what you're going to do to them
[01:51:20.600 --> 01:51:25.600]  So, now you have some breathing space, now you can get artful
[01:51:25.600 --> 01:51:27.600]  Artful, thank you
[01:51:27.600 --> 01:51:33.600]  Okay, I got it, I think that's all I need to hear, I think I got it, yeah
[01:51:33.600 --> 01:51:40.600]  Okay, good, thank you EJ, and keep us up to speed, this is going to get to be fun
[01:51:40.600 --> 01:51:47.600]  And if you need help, send me an email, I'll send one to, have you talked to Tina?
[01:51:47.600 --> 01:51:56.600]  Yeah, I talked to her like two months ago, I need to call out, I'll give her another ring tomorrow, yeah
[01:51:56.600 --> 01:51:59.600]  Okay, have you talked to Bob?
[01:51:59.600 --> 01:52:01.600]  No, I don't know who Bob is
[01:52:01.600 --> 01:52:06.600]  Oh, you need to talk to Bob, he is such a stinker
[01:52:06.600 --> 01:52:10.600]  He is having, I have to keep chastising him
[01:52:10.600 --> 01:52:18.600]  Bob, you are having way too much fun, he will be a great resource for you
[01:52:18.600 --> 01:52:23.600]  So, send me an email and ask for an introduction, I'll send it to him
[01:52:23.600 --> 01:52:25.600]  Okay, something
[01:52:25.600 --> 01:52:30.600]  You will like this guy, he's a real character and he's not the least bit afraid of him anymore
[01:52:30.600 --> 01:52:35.600]  He listened to our show and he said that he didn't have anything
[01:52:35.600 --> 01:52:42.600]  I had said the best fight has the one you picked, so he went to Riverside, California and picked a fight
[01:52:42.600 --> 01:52:48.600]  And now he has them in the federal court, and he's just having a great time
[01:52:48.600 --> 01:52:51.600]  Oh, I need to talk to Bob
[01:52:51.600 --> 01:52:57.600]  He will be a good resource, so send me an email, I will get you two in contact
[01:52:57.600 --> 01:53:01.600]  Okay, thank you, have a wonderful evening, God bless
[01:53:01.600 --> 01:53:02.600]  Thank you
[01:53:02.600 --> 01:53:06.600]  Okay, now we're going to go to Ms. Mary in Texas
[01:53:06.600 --> 01:53:13.600]  Ms. Mary, have you got your political pack together?
[01:53:13.600 --> 01:53:20.600]  I got a DBA today and I posted it on Facebook, the name is still a little bit of a secret
[01:53:20.600 --> 01:53:25.600]  But I'm almost there and I've got the official version, you own the name
[01:53:25.600 --> 01:53:28.600]  Okay, Mary is going to help me set up a pack
[01:53:28.600 --> 01:53:35.600]  Explain to us the power of a pack
[01:53:35.600 --> 01:53:43.600]  The power of a pack is you're one step above the grassroots, you can control a little bit
[01:53:43.600 --> 01:53:49.600]  The personality of the organization, you want to keep the top slim, you don't want to have big members
[01:53:49.600 --> 01:53:51.600]  I mean a big board
[01:53:51.600 --> 01:53:59.600]  Also, you can get involved with campaigns, as soon as you're involved with a campaign or a party
[01:53:59.600 --> 01:54:04.600]  You can become a poll watcher, a poll watcher
[01:54:04.600 --> 01:54:11.600]  And so get involved with your party or get involved with a campaigner and they can sign you up to watch the polls
[01:54:11.600 --> 01:54:16.600]  Also, it's basically a business for political interest
[01:54:16.600 --> 01:54:23.600]  So you can raise money and have operating expenses, it's not a non-profit
[01:54:23.600 --> 01:54:28.600]  But in some ways, it's in some ways similar, but think of it as a traditional business model
[01:54:28.600 --> 01:54:32.600]  There's somebody in Austin who has something kind of like this
[01:54:32.600 --> 01:54:38.600]  And ultimately with these type of networking groupings, you might have three or four different variations
[01:54:38.600 --> 01:54:42.600]  One of his is called a strategies incorporated
[01:54:42.600 --> 01:54:48.600]  So I'm not going to give the name out, but it's called such and such strategies, LLC or something
[01:54:48.600 --> 01:54:53.600]  So you can have that as a business, you can have a non-profit, you can have a pack
[01:54:53.600 --> 01:54:59.600]  You know, you can have several forms of these structures as it suits your needs
[01:54:59.600 --> 01:55:09.600]  And this is something people can donate to and have that as a tax write-off
[01:55:09.600 --> 01:55:12.600]  Is that correct?
[01:55:12.600 --> 01:55:19.600]  I don't know. I am looking that up. I have some consultants I'm working with and some politicians I'm working with
[01:55:19.600 --> 01:55:26.600]  So what I was told is don't worry about the money, just get the name and get your wheels on the ground
[01:55:26.600 --> 01:55:30.600]  And then start analyzing the business format
[01:55:30.600 --> 01:55:36.600]  So there will be a certain type of format which will allow you to operate financially
[01:55:36.600 --> 01:55:43.600]  Okay, good. Well, I have a tax guy here and people who listen to the show, I don't recommend people very often
[01:55:43.600 --> 01:55:54.600]  But I got David here, David Lewis, and if anybody has any tax issues, send me an email, I'll get you in contact with David
[01:55:54.600 --> 01:55:58.600]  David would absolutely keep you out of trouble
[01:55:58.600 --> 01:56:08.600]  He understands how the IRS works, what the IRS agent wants, and he says, don't fight with them, give them what they want
[01:56:08.600 --> 01:56:15.600]  And they'll gladly sign off on your tax and you go away happy, but he'll be able to help me out with that part
[01:56:15.600 --> 01:56:23.600]  David's really intelligent. He continues his education and I just respect him so much
[01:56:23.600 --> 01:56:30.600]  At 70 years old, he gets a degree in paralegal. Who does that at 70?
[01:56:30.600 --> 01:56:33.600]  He's an inspiration
[01:56:33.600 --> 01:56:37.600]  And that's not all. He's a jarhead
[01:56:37.600 --> 01:56:41.600]  He's a jarhead and he's a handsome guy at that
[01:56:41.600 --> 01:56:48.600]  Yeah, he's an ex-Marine pilot, but jarheads don't take any crapola
[01:56:48.600 --> 01:56:55.600]  Okay, but anyway, so you'll help me with the tax side
[01:56:55.600 --> 01:57:05.600]  And I'm hoping that you'll be, generally when you invest in, when you donate to political PACs, that's tax deductible
[01:57:05.600 --> 01:57:13.600]  Well, let me add this, that a PAC is also going to let you and your interest intermingle with other groups
[01:57:13.600 --> 01:57:19.600]  So you form coalitions. Me, our group, this group and that group say no to this bond
[01:57:19.600 --> 01:57:22.600]  Our group, this group and that group say no to this politician
[01:57:22.600 --> 01:57:25.600]  Our group, this group and that group are suing the city
[01:57:25.600 --> 01:57:33.600]  Our group, this group and that group have formed a coalition and we're going to increase funding for, you know, the police
[01:57:33.600 --> 01:57:43.600]  Our group, you know, so you form coalitions and you control and encourage the candidates as they run and campaign, you control and encourage them while they're in office
[01:57:43.600 --> 01:57:50.600]  And if they're not acting as they said they would, you can threaten to recall them while they're in office
[01:57:50.600 --> 01:57:55.600]  We can't just keep running around chasing candidates
[01:57:55.600 --> 01:58:04.600]  Well, the thing that Mary's been pushing me about a PAC for quite a while and I'm beginning to understand the power of it
[01:58:04.600 --> 01:58:10.600]  Do you want to tell people what your acronym means?
[01:58:10.600 --> 01:58:12.600]  Acronym?
[01:58:12.600 --> 01:58:14.600]  Political Action Committee
[01:58:14.600 --> 01:58:17.600]  I'm sorry, Political Action Committee
[01:58:17.600 --> 01:58:26.600]  So anybody who's listening to my show for a long time knows that I don't do politics or I haven't done politics
[01:58:26.600 --> 01:58:32.600]  As far as I'm concerned, I don't care who's in office
[01:58:32.600 --> 01:58:44.600]  If I were to be, to declare myself to a position or a party, it would be the conservative right, it would be the Republican Party
[01:58:44.600 --> 01:58:49.600]  But as a matter of discipline, I won't do that
[01:58:49.600 --> 01:58:58.600]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it
[01:58:58.600 --> 01:59:06.600]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture
[01:59:06.600 --> 01:59:17.600]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes
[01:59:17.600 --> 01:59:27.600]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before
[01:59:27.600 --> 01:59:32.600]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking
[01:59:32.600 --> 01:59:42.600]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:42.600 --> 01:59:46.600]  Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[01:59:46.600 --> 02:00:02.600]  That's freestudybible.com