ROL_2021-10-01_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:06.760] The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[00:06.760 --> 00:13.160] Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.160 --> 00:21.520] silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, brand crude
[00:21.520 --> 00:29.960] $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, bitcoin, core $10,566.52, ethereum $200.00
[00:29.960 --> 00:41.320] $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, white coin $100.31, and bitcoin cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.320 --> 00:52.320] Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.320 --> 00:57.800] on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing
[00:57.800 --> 01:04.800] the 10 and entering 40 today in history.
[01:04.800 --> 01:09.800] And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hepin attacks
[01:09.800 --> 01:14.440] his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, and San
[01:14.440 --> 01:18.880] Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones
[01:18.880 --> 01:22.840] since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:22.840 --> 01:24.760] test the herb for THC.
[01:24.760 --> 01:28.440] Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:28.440 --> 01:33.000] she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.000 --> 01:34.000] law.
[01:34.000 --> 01:37.600] Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:37.600 --> 01:42.080] to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.080 --> 01:48.240] in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.240 --> 01:51.200] well as other cities too like the district attorney.
[01:51.200 --> 01:56.800] In El Paso, Jaime Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law
[01:56.800 --> 02:01.840] quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.840 --> 02:06.760] However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.760 --> 02:11.200] in Harris County who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[02:11.200 --> 02:13.480] illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.480 --> 02:17.360] It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.360 --> 02:22.600] charged with.
[02:22.600 --> 02:27.240] A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[02:27.240 --> 02:32.360] as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.360 --> 02:38.040] shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.040 --> 02:39.520] Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.520 --> 02:43.800] According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:43.800 --> 02:50.080] its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.080 --> 03:18.520] glow.
[03:20.080 --> 03:24.080] What's she gonna do? What's she gonna do?
[03:27.080 --> 03:30.080] Bad boys, bad boys, what's she gonna do?
[03:30.080 --> 03:32.080] What's she gonna do when they come for you?
[03:32.080 --> 03:35.080] Bad boys, bad boys, what's she gonna do?
[03:35.080 --> 03:38.080] What's she gonna do when they come for you?
[03:38.080 --> 03:41.080] When you were it and you had bad dreams
[03:41.080 --> 03:43.080] You go to school and learn the golden rules
[03:43.080 --> 03:46.080] So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[03:46.080 --> 03:50.080] It's just a man and you must just prove it Bad boys, bad boys
[03:50.080 --> 03:53.080] What she gonna do? Oh what she gonna do?
[03:53.080 --> 03:56.080] When they come for you? Bad boys, bad boys
[03:56.080 --> 03:58.080] What she gonna do? Oh what she gonna do?
[03:58.080 --> 04:00.080] When they come for you?
[04:00.080 --> 04:03.080] You're choking on bad ones You're choking on A's ones
[04:03.080 --> 04:05.080] You're choking on your mother No, you're choking on your father
[04:05.080 --> 04:08.080] You're choking on your butter Then you're choking on your sister
[04:08.080 --> 04:11.080] You're choking on bad men No, you're choking on me
[04:11.080 --> 04:12.080] Hmm, bad boys Bad boys
[04:12.080 --> 04:15.080] What you gonna do? What's she gonna do?
[04:15.080 --> 04:18.040] When they come for you bad boys bad boys
[04:18.040 --> 04:20.540] What you gonna do, what you gonna do
[04:20.540 --> 04:23.560] When they come for you bad boys bad boys
[04:23.560 --> 04:26.060] What you gonna do, what you gonna do
[04:26.060 --> 04:28.960] When they come for you bad boys bad boys
[04:28.960 --> 04:31.600] What you gonna do, what you gonna do
[04:31.600 --> 04:33.100] When they come for you
[04:33.100 --> 04:35.840] Nobody not give me no break
[04:35.840 --> 04:37.860] Police not give me no break
[04:37.860 --> 04:40.500] That everything has driving me crazy
[04:40.500 --> 04:43.040] They keep in their eyes you now give me no breaks
[05:13.040 --> 05:21.080] Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Rhett Fountain, Rue de la Radio on this, the first day of
[05:21.080 --> 05:26.000] October 2021.
[05:26.000 --> 05:29.640] And I'm going to turn the phone lines on.
[05:29.640 --> 05:34.320] So if you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[05:34.320 --> 05:40.680] Phones are up and we've got someone who's going to call in and talk about a presentation
[05:40.680 --> 05:43.960] and I'm going to do next Monday.
[05:43.960 --> 05:51.200] And then I've got another presentation set up for the 23rd in Dallas.
[05:51.200 --> 05:54.480] The one Monday is going to be in Fort Worth area.
[05:54.480 --> 05:57.600] So if you're in the Fort Worth area, if you're in the Dallas area, I'm going to be doing
[05:57.600 --> 06:00.200] some presentations.
[06:00.200 --> 06:05.800] We can come on down and the person's going to be in a bar so we can all get drunk afterward
[06:05.800 --> 06:09.720] and start a fight.
[06:09.720 --> 06:13.480] Or maybe not.
[06:13.480 --> 06:17.320] Are you selling the videos of this?
[06:17.320 --> 06:18.320] Probably not.
[06:18.320 --> 06:22.720] Okay, we do have a caller.
[06:22.720 --> 06:23.960] I think this is Aubrey.
[06:23.960 --> 06:25.480] Aubrey, is this you?
[06:25.480 --> 06:27.640] Yes, yes, it's me.
[06:27.640 --> 06:30.840] Okay, I was just talking about the presentations.
[06:30.840 --> 06:35.440] Are you telling everybody where it's going to be and what it's going to be about?
[06:35.440 --> 06:43.080] Sure, yes, it's going to be at the Rail Club Live, 3101 Joyce Drive in Fort Worth, Texas.
[06:43.080 --> 06:45.080] They are a victim of Betsy Price.
[06:45.080 --> 06:48.560] She really crushed them during the shutdowns.
[06:48.560 --> 06:51.800] So we're doing a lot of our events over there to help them get back on their feet and they
[06:51.800 --> 06:57.080] are Patriot-owned so they don't give us any gusts about any topics we want to cover.
[06:57.080 --> 07:02.480] And the topic that we're going to cover on Monday is going to be constitutional remedy.
[07:02.480 --> 07:07.400] So we have a few projects already going down right now.
[07:07.400 --> 07:10.160] We've got some resolutions that are being filed.
[07:10.160 --> 07:12.160] One was just filed today.
[07:12.160 --> 07:16.640] Really want Randy to take a look at that and speak with the woman and the 41 precinct chairs
[07:16.640 --> 07:19.240] that are working on that.
[07:19.240 --> 07:23.760] We've got Affidavit of formal declarations of complaints.
[07:23.760 --> 07:25.880] Affidavit is the truth.
[07:25.880 --> 07:29.640] And Randy is going to take a look at those and kind of help teach us how to work them
[07:29.640 --> 07:35.680] into potentially criminal filings if he can.
[07:35.680 --> 07:42.920] If we can get it right, then Randy is going to help us really drive the nail home, you
[07:42.920 --> 07:43.920] know what I mean?
[07:43.920 --> 07:44.920] Yes.
[07:44.920 --> 07:45.920] Yes.
[07:45.920 --> 07:48.920] They've been working on the voter fraud issues.
[07:48.920 --> 07:53.960] Those were related to election integrity in Texas.
[07:53.960 --> 07:54.960] Right.
[07:54.960 --> 07:57.800] I might have glazed over that part.
[07:57.800 --> 08:06.040] And what I want to do is help them look at what they see as being done wrong, instead
[08:06.040 --> 08:12.920] of looking at it as some kind of social or civil issue.
[08:12.920 --> 08:17.320] Look at it as the law commands you to do this thing.
[08:17.320 --> 08:21.680] If you fail to do this thing and in the process to not assist in phone for access to enjoyment
[08:21.680 --> 08:27.520] right, I think most everybody who listens to regular knows what that is.
[08:27.520 --> 08:29.720] It's 3903 penal code.
[08:29.720 --> 08:34.280] It is a class A misdemeanor.
[08:34.280 --> 08:40.880] And whether we want to be the bad guy or not as citizens in this republic, if we have
[08:40.880 --> 08:46.160] knowledge that crime has been committed, we have a duty to report that crime.
[08:46.160 --> 08:51.440] And when we do report that crime, we are absolutely protected.
[08:51.440 --> 08:54.480] So that's what I want to teach them.
[08:54.480 --> 08:56.160] How to do it and how to have fun at it.
[08:56.160 --> 08:58.880] Go ahead, Albert.
[08:58.880 --> 09:04.040] So Randy already has gone through one of my affidavits and he really helped me out.
[09:04.040 --> 09:08.520] He told me at first that I may not like his assessment of my affidavit, but actually really
[09:08.520 --> 09:15.920] enjoyed it because he took it apart and made me piece it back together until it made sense
[09:15.920 --> 09:21.760] until I found myself the direct criminal violation that can actually be worked with in a court
[09:21.760 --> 09:22.960] of law.
[09:22.960 --> 09:27.000] That's what we want to get everybody to do with one.
[09:27.000 --> 09:31.800] I was merciless and that's what we like.
[09:31.800 --> 09:40.480] Just like Eddie does to me, Eddie's got no consideration in my delicate sensibilities.
[09:40.480 --> 09:45.880] He just rips me to shreds and when I complain about it, he says, well, that's what you told
[09:45.880 --> 09:46.880] me to do.
[09:46.880 --> 09:53.120] Yeah, I know, but you didn't have to take me up quite so literal.
[09:53.120 --> 09:58.640] I'm going to have to ask your wife about your, if you have delicate sensibilities.
[09:58.640 --> 10:05.240] I've probably lost those a long time ago.
[10:05.240 --> 10:14.600] But yeah, in the groups, we need to not be sensitive about that.
[10:14.600 --> 10:21.520] We need to rip each other to shreds, cut one another no slack because when we get out in
[10:21.520 --> 10:29.160] the general public and we're dealing with other people who are not really solidified
[10:29.160 --> 10:36.960] in their beliefs and understandings, we become more specific to the point, articulate.
[10:36.960 --> 10:43.120] People can understand us and we can help other people come on board.
[10:43.120 --> 10:46.200] We don't deserve any slack between one another.
[10:46.200 --> 10:53.880] Right, and it's okay to be wrong or, you know, I mean, that's why I reached back out to Randy
[10:53.880 --> 10:58.240] is because he was telling us what we needed to hear and people didn't really like it.
[10:58.240 --> 11:02.040] I could tell some people didn't like it because they didn't see the value in what he was saying.
[11:02.040 --> 11:03.040] He wasn't wrong.
[11:03.040 --> 11:08.600] He was absolutely right and, you know, actually I should have reached back out to Randy sooner
[11:08.600 --> 11:09.600] than I did.
[11:09.600 --> 11:13.400] I just met again at an Allen West meet and greet.
[11:13.400 --> 11:16.960] I was actually there, not for Allen West, but to talk to Sheriff Weyborn.
[11:16.960 --> 11:22.200] Oh, and she did talk to Sheriff Weyborn.
[11:22.200 --> 11:27.520] He wanted out of there.
[11:27.520 --> 11:31.760] He felt a little uncomfortable after a few minutes, a few questions.
[11:31.760 --> 11:39.080] Well, the shade of red that his face was, I was concerned he might blow a gasket.
[11:39.080 --> 11:41.720] That couldn't have been me.
[11:41.720 --> 11:45.960] I think that room was full of patriots that have questions for him.
[11:45.960 --> 11:53.040] He actually has already put himself out there as, you know, being an advocate for the people,
[11:53.040 --> 11:54.480] but will he actually do it?
[11:54.480 --> 11:55.480] I'm not sure.
[11:55.480 --> 11:58.800] Does he actually understand the law that we believe has been violated?
[11:58.800 --> 11:59.800] I don't know.
[11:59.800 --> 12:00.800] That's the issue.
[12:00.800 --> 12:02.120] There's a lot of these people who have taken oaths.
[12:02.120 --> 12:05.920] They don't seem to have ever read the Constitution.
[12:05.920 --> 12:14.720] I talked to him before the presentation about my primary issue as taken for magistrate,
[12:14.720 --> 12:18.320] and he was really knowledgeable of law.
[12:18.320 --> 12:21.320] He knew the codes.
[12:21.320 --> 12:26.080] There's one thing he's misinterpreting, and I'm trying to get a meeting with him.
[12:26.080 --> 12:34.400] He's agreed to meet with me, and I'll present to him that piece that he is misinterpreting.
[12:34.400 --> 12:38.960] This part of 14.06 that says when someone's brought before magistrate, the magistrate
[12:38.960 --> 12:47.600] shall immediately issue the warnings in 1517, and he's taken that to mean that all of the
[12:47.600 --> 12:54.360] other statutes in the Code of Criminal Procedure that go to a preliminary hearing can simply
[12:54.360 --> 12:55.360] be ignored.
[12:55.360 --> 13:03.680] Well, we'll see how that works out, because I have a $400 million lawsuit against Wise
[13:03.680 --> 13:06.080] County for doing that.
[13:06.080 --> 13:13.680] I want to be able to present this to the Sheriff himself in detail, so I'm going to
[13:13.680 --> 13:19.200] ask him to have an ADA present.
[13:19.200 --> 13:20.200] Have a lawyer present.
[13:20.200 --> 13:22.560] I want to take on your attorney.
[13:22.560 --> 13:23.800] I've done this before.
[13:23.800 --> 13:27.200] I'll rip him to shreds.
[13:27.200 --> 13:30.440] I'm going to propose that the Sheriff make a change.
[13:30.440 --> 13:36.680] He'll either make the change, and he can be the one I can point to in every other county
[13:36.680 --> 13:43.440] and say, this is how it should be done, or I can say, don't be like this clown.
[13:43.440 --> 13:44.440] Right.
[13:44.440 --> 13:47.480] Make another kind of example out of him.
[13:47.480 --> 13:55.600] Yes, and I'm hoping I can find a Sheriff who will actually look at this and perhaps see
[13:55.600 --> 13:57.600] the value in it.
[13:57.600 --> 14:07.240] But from Audrey's point, I want to look close at the election laws and how we can turn what
[14:07.240 --> 14:16.000] we perceive as improprieties into criminal affidavits.
[14:16.000 --> 14:20.560] This is how we'll get the officials' attention.
[14:20.560 --> 14:26.720] When we're not just complaining and filing resolutions for change and asking for new
[14:26.720 --> 14:33.000] legislation, but we're down there asking them to go get that guy, put cuffs on him, and
[14:33.000 --> 14:42.560] drag him off to jail for cause, that's going to get their attention.
[14:42.560 --> 14:46.440] And I'm hoping Aubrey can bring me a whole bunch of these folks, and we can set them
[14:46.440 --> 14:47.440] on the path.
[14:47.440 --> 14:48.440] I'm going to try.
[14:48.440 --> 14:49.440] I'm going to try.
[14:49.440 --> 14:54.480] Most of them, they're very difficult to track down.
[14:54.480 --> 14:59.720] Some people who have actually witnessed the election code violation, and even few of them
[14:59.720 --> 15:03.960] actually know the election code that they witnessed being violated, they just saw something
[15:03.960 --> 15:04.960] and they know it's wrong.
[15:04.960 --> 15:09.480] So, I was actually trained by a woman who doesn't really want her name out there.
[15:09.480 --> 15:14.520] She kind of goes underground, but she's got a very thorough election poll launchers training
[15:14.520 --> 15:16.520] course, and she put me and my partner through it.
[15:16.520 --> 15:20.840] So, we actually have a really good idea of what to look for, and it's the whole litany
[15:20.840 --> 15:25.720] of election codes that she has seen evidence of being violated.
[15:25.720 --> 15:32.160] Some of them have criminal penalties to them, some of them don't, and we probably need
[15:32.160 --> 15:39.160] to also talk about that because we're watching some of these legislators attempt to sort
[15:39.160 --> 15:43.560] of, it looks like they're trying to get out ahead of what we're doing, and they're writing
[15:43.560 --> 15:49.160] legislation to make legal what they've done, what was illegal in 2020, and in some of the
[15:49.160 --> 15:56.720] early elections in 2021, and lowering penalties, right, they're lowering penalties for violations
[15:56.720 --> 16:01.840] of election code, for example, Brisco Cain, who's allegedly the head of the election committee
[16:01.840 --> 16:11.120] in the Texas House, he wrote what was it, HB6 and SB7, I believe, I think it was the
[16:11.120 --> 16:15.640] same bill, I might have those numbers switched up, it might be SB6 and HB7, but there was
[16:15.640 --> 16:23.400] the same bill, but Brisco Cain wrote an amendment in there that lowered the penalty for obstructing
[16:23.400 --> 16:29.000] a poll watcher, so as it was to obstruct a poll watcher who's been lawfully appointed
[16:29.000 --> 16:33.000] and accepted into a polling place, if you obstruct them from viewing something they're
[16:33.000 --> 16:37.240] lawfully allowed to view, that's a class A misdemeanor, Cain just lowered it to a class
[16:37.240 --> 16:41.880] B misdemeanor to not let them in the first place, so do you think the Democrats are
[16:41.880 --> 16:47.000] going to risk the ticket and take the election or what?
[16:47.000 --> 16:55.400] That's a maneuver, but it's not going to be a very effective one, because if you're an
[16:55.400 --> 17:00.320] election judge or something and you block a poll watcher.
[17:00.320 --> 17:05.640] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[17:05.640 --> 17:09.120] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[17:09.120 --> 17:13.440] Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[17:13.440 --> 17:14.440] can win two.
[17:14.440 --> 17:19.280] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.280 --> 17:25.120] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[17:25.120 --> 17:29.680] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[17:29.680 --> 17:33.880] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.880 --> 17:39.000] The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:39.000 --> 17:41.120] Federal consultation is available as well.
[17:41.120 --> 17:46.640] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner
[17:46.640 --> 17:49.640] or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[17:49.640 --> 17:59.200] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[17:59.200 --> 18:00.200] now.
[18:00.200 --> 18:04.760] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[18:04.760 --> 18:08.280] In today's America we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[18:08.280 --> 18:12.240] going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.240 --> 18:15.680] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:15.680 --> 18:19.720] in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law.
[18:19.720 --> 18:23.600] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.600 --> 18:25.440] our rights through due process.
[18:25.440 --> 18:28.920] Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the
[18:28.920 --> 18:32.680] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.680 --> 18:35.080] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:35.080 --> 18:39.080] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and
[18:39.080 --> 18:40.440] ordering your copy today.
[18:40.440 --> 18:43.600] By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.600 --> 18:48.200] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:48.200 --> 18:50.520] documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.520 --> 18:54.480] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[18:54.480 --> 19:10.760] For your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:24.480 --> 19:37.000] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio and we're talking to Aubrey
[19:37.000 --> 19:38.000] and Forrest.
[19:38.000 --> 19:39.000] Uh, Tarrant County, yep.
[19:39.000 --> 19:40.000] Pardon me?
[19:40.000 --> 19:47.880] Uh, Tarrant County, I'm in Arlington but we kind of cover all of Tarrant County and
[19:47.880 --> 19:51.160] yeah, we're in Fort Worth with all of our events for sure.
[19:51.160 --> 19:54.200] Okay, Arlington, yeah, we've had fun in Arlington.
[19:54.200 --> 19:55.200] We've had fun.
[19:55.200 --> 19:56.200] Oh, really?
[19:56.200 --> 19:59.200] Yeah, we've had fun in Arlington.
[19:59.200 --> 20:10.800] A city, a municipal clerk told me that when I asked to see some traffic cases that if
[20:10.800 --> 20:16.200] I wasn't the accused or the accused attorney I couldn't see the records.
[20:16.200 --> 20:18.200] Oh, we'll have a fact.
[20:18.200 --> 20:25.800] And I told her, you shouldn't have said that, they called Bailey Fover and asked him to
[20:25.800 --> 20:31.520] arrest her and when she told him what I'd asked for and he said, well, you can't see
[20:31.520 --> 20:33.960] those if you're not an attorney.
[20:33.960 --> 20:35.360] You shouldn't have said that.
[20:35.360 --> 20:39.280] I took out my cell phone and you can't use your cell phone in there.
[20:39.280 --> 20:43.440] I looked up and said, are you going to interfere with a 911 call?
[20:43.440 --> 20:44.440] Oops.
[20:44.440 --> 20:47.440] Oh, it was a circus.
[20:47.440 --> 20:48.440] That's brutal.
[20:48.440 --> 20:49.440] That's brutal.
[20:49.440 --> 20:52.200] So what are we saying when we went out?
[20:52.200 --> 20:54.840] The fear of the 911 call.
[20:54.840 --> 21:03.000] You've got someone trying to change this violation from a Class A to a Class B misdemeanor.
[21:03.000 --> 21:04.600] That's not going to help much.
[21:04.600 --> 21:13.280] So if you're one of these guys that they've trained to block poll watchers and we come
[21:13.280 --> 21:20.880] along and file a criminal complaint against you for a Class B misdemeanor or a Class A
[21:20.880 --> 21:23.920] misdemeanor, how much difference is that going to make?
[21:23.920 --> 21:27.360] Yeah, still going to jail, Bubba.
[21:27.360 --> 21:32.320] So even if he gets this lowered, all it's going to do is make him look bad.
[21:32.320 --> 21:37.160] And plus he can't really protect by this lowering the severity.
[21:37.160 --> 21:41.360] He can't really do anything about what happened in the past.
[21:41.360 --> 21:45.640] He can only do something about what happens in the future for that particular crime.
[21:45.640 --> 21:52.960] If somebody gets convicted for what happened on a date that was prior to that revision,
[21:52.960 --> 21:55.480] then they're guilty for that Class A.
[21:55.480 --> 21:57.480] That's great news.
[21:57.480 --> 21:58.480] That was good.
[21:58.480 --> 22:04.600] So we can still actually get the people who we know were blatantly, willingly, knowingly
[22:04.600 --> 22:06.600] violating the law.
[22:06.600 --> 22:08.480] Yes.
[22:08.480 --> 22:09.480] And we should.
[22:09.480 --> 22:13.720] We should get every single one we can find.
[22:13.720 --> 22:16.720] We have them because I have a poll watcher affidavits.
[22:16.720 --> 22:20.280] They're not just voter affidavits, not just people who don't know what was going on.
[22:20.280 --> 22:21.880] These are lawfully appointed poll watchers.
[22:21.880 --> 22:25.400] I've got some from several counties around the Metroplex.
[22:25.400 --> 22:30.040] They're for different things, but definitely some of them are for blatant obstruction of
[22:30.040 --> 22:34.600] the poll watchers, not letting them in the same type of stuff we saw nationwide.
[22:34.600 --> 22:35.600] What's happening?
[22:35.600 --> 22:36.600] Good.
[22:36.600 --> 22:40.800] Then what, the other side's going to have this argument.
[22:40.800 --> 22:45.640] Well, I did it, had this reason, I had this justification, that justification.
[22:45.640 --> 22:48.720] Well, those are all well and good.
[22:48.720 --> 22:55.720] And they may well act as affirmative defenses.
[22:55.720 --> 23:01.600] But the thing about affirmative defenses is they must be pled.
[23:01.600 --> 23:08.840] They may be an affirmative defense, but they're not a bar from prosecution.
[23:08.840 --> 23:14.280] So you still go to the JP, you still had get arrested, you still put an up bail, and your
[23:14.280 --> 23:17.560] liberty is at risk.
[23:17.560 --> 23:25.960] You better hope your affirmative defense is accepted by the jury, or more specifically
[23:25.960 --> 23:26.960] a grand jury.
[23:26.960 --> 23:31.920] That's exactly what I was going to ask you about, what is your position on using a grand
[23:31.920 --> 23:36.400] jury for issues like this when we can't get local officials to do anything at all?
[23:36.400 --> 23:41.840] Well, when you can't get local officials to do anything at all, you take them to the
[23:41.840 --> 23:44.560] grand jury.
[23:44.560 --> 23:49.520] That's part of what we call running the routine on them.
[23:49.520 --> 23:53.000] What you want to do is, you want to say something, Brett?
[23:53.000 --> 23:55.360] No, that's what I'm saying.
[23:55.360 --> 24:02.040] That's what we do, take the ones who refuse to do their job to the grand jury.
[24:02.040 --> 24:13.480] And so you go to this, we want to find a judge or a JP who is favorable to these guys, that
[24:13.480 --> 24:16.960] we know will not act on our criminal complaint.
[24:16.960 --> 24:20.720] You see, we've got this rule.
[24:20.720 --> 24:29.480] Never ask public official to do anything you actually want them to do, because you never
[24:29.480 --> 24:35.080] ask a public official to do anything that the law does not compel them to do.
[24:35.080 --> 24:37.800] So when they don't do it, boom, you get to land on them.
[24:37.800 --> 24:44.120] Now, whatever you do, never give fair warning.
[24:44.120 --> 24:50.400] We as patriots, we have this inclination to go in there and say, oh, I got this right,
[24:50.400 --> 24:55.600] you're supposed to do this, you're supposed to do that, no, no, no, no, no.
[24:55.600 --> 24:57.880] Don't do that.
[24:57.880 --> 25:03.080] Buswack is so much better than giving fair warning.
[25:03.080 --> 25:06.760] Like this clerk, when I asked to see these records, and she said I had to be an attorney
[25:06.760 --> 25:11.600] to see those records, now I could have told her what the law said, and I could have told
[25:11.600 --> 25:18.200] her what my rights are and what her duties are, but I'm not her lawyer, she wants legal
[25:18.200 --> 25:24.480] advice, well, we'll call the prosecution attorney, he'll tell you, no, you can't say that to
[25:24.480 --> 25:30.720] him, because that's a crime for you to do that, but now I'm not her attorney, so I'm
[25:30.720 --> 25:36.040] not going to give her legal advice, so I'll just call the bait-off over and ask him to
[25:36.040 --> 25:37.440] arrest her.
[25:37.440 --> 25:43.880] If you haven't done that at least once, you've missed all the fun of dealing with these guys
[25:43.880 --> 25:55.640] and in the next election, in the next election, we want poll watchers armed with these tools.
[25:55.640 --> 26:04.120] All of them need a cell phone with 911 on speed dialing.
[26:04.120 --> 26:12.760] When they're down there at the polls and anyone interferes with them at all, 911 immediately.
[26:12.760 --> 26:20.600] That's what we're trying to do, yes, now will there be, is that something we can do when
[26:20.600 --> 26:25.280] there is no penalty codified in the law for the violation that we're witnessing?
[26:25.280 --> 26:37.800] Okay, here's the deal, we have this magic code, 39.03, it's like the shape shifter,
[26:37.800 --> 26:39.600] one size fits all.
[26:39.600 --> 26:46.760] Exactly, you know, if I'm a private citizen, there are things that I can do that actually
[26:46.760 --> 26:54.320] violate code, but the code does not specify a penalty for it.
[26:54.320 --> 27:01.800] Not the same with a public official, 39.03 says that if a public official acting on
[27:01.800 --> 27:09.960] to the color or pretense of an official capacity exerts or purports to exert an authority he
[27:09.960 --> 27:17.800] does not specifically have or fails to perform a duty he is required to perform and denies
[27:17.800 --> 27:22.720] the citizen full and free access to or enjoyment right, well, that's a class thing that's
[27:22.720 --> 27:30.200] to be in the state of Texas, so there is a penalty for any violation of a rule or a
[27:30.200 --> 27:31.200] law.
[27:31.200 --> 27:32.200] Very good, very good.
[27:32.200 --> 27:36.480] Yeah, it's like a catch-all for public officials only because it's referring to their duties
[27:36.480 --> 27:39.480] of office.
[27:39.480 --> 27:45.480] That's amazing, is that a Texas penal code?
[27:45.480 --> 27:55.920] Yes, we can be really proud of that, Texas people, perfect question, yes and no.
[27:55.920 --> 28:04.440] Now, when Brett said yes, that's 39.03 and Texas is called official oppression.
[28:04.440 --> 28:11.000] In most states it's called official misconduct, but all states have it, Texas has two.
[28:11.000 --> 28:17.560] The haven't official misconduct, that's 39.02, but that goes to misappropriation of public
[28:17.560 --> 28:28.440] funds, filling your private car on your public official credit card or something.
[28:28.440 --> 28:33.120] We have a second one, official oppression that goes specifically to this issue.
[28:33.120 --> 28:41.160] This 39.03 reflects 18 U.S. Code 242, the Ku Klux Klan Act and it says essentially the
[28:41.160 --> 28:45.000] same thing, it's just a lot more verbiage.
[28:45.000 --> 28:48.320] So you can get them both in the state and in the Fed.
[28:48.320 --> 28:53.680] The problem with the Fed is you can't get them to come out and arrest these people.
[28:53.680 --> 29:02.720] Yeah, would you have to just, I mean, so, yeah, I mean, what would happen if, so, for
[29:02.720 --> 29:08.480] a national, so say we want to file a national, you know, like one of the attorneys that I
[29:08.480 --> 29:11.480] know she wants to do that.
[29:11.480 --> 29:18.400] How would we turn state violations that we find into, you know, how do we make that connection
[29:18.400 --> 29:22.040] between like, I mean, okay, I don't know even know how to ask for it.
[29:22.040 --> 29:30.360] Okay, okay, it rings in tort, you know, normally when you file a civil action, that a civil
[29:30.360 --> 29:37.120] action, for the most part, is bringing in causes of action.
[29:37.120 --> 29:46.360] Causes of action are defined harms that befall people engaged in contractual agreements.
[29:46.360 --> 29:50.840] But if you're driving down the street and a city worker's running a backhoe and you're
[29:50.840 --> 29:55.560] stopped at a light and he puts a backhoe stinger through your window, you're not under a contract
[29:55.560 --> 29:57.440] with him.
[29:57.440 --> 30:02.720] That's something he did to you.
[30:02.720 --> 30:06.360] It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively
[30:06.360 --> 30:07.360] affected our health?
[30:07.360 --> 30:11.400] I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about
[30:11.400 --> 30:15.840] how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:15.840 --> 30:17.440] Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.440 --> 30:21.840] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[30:21.840 --> 30:25.800] is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.800 --> 30:30.920] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.920 --> 30:33.560] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.560 --> 30:37.880] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.880 --> 30:41.360] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.360 --> 30:45.160] Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.160 --> 30:47.280] Cell phones emit radio frequency energy.
[30:47.280 --> 30:48.280] It's a fact.
[30:48.280 --> 30:51.800] But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head
[30:51.800 --> 30:52.800] has been disputed.
[30:52.800 --> 30:57.160] Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[30:57.160 --> 31:01.680] Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones
[31:01.680 --> 31:03.080] affect brain chemistry.
[31:03.080 --> 31:08.320] A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest
[31:08.320 --> 31:12.000] to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:12.000 --> 31:16.200] While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any
[31:16.200 --> 31:17.200] chances.
[31:17.200 --> 31:21.000] I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[31:21.000 --> 31:22.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:22.000 --> 31:30.680] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.680 --> 31:31.680] I lost my son.
[31:31.680 --> 31:32.680] My nephew.
[31:32.680 --> 31:33.680] My son.
[31:33.680 --> 31:38.480] On September 11th, 2000, most people don't know that a third tower fell on September
[31:38.480 --> 31:39.480] 11th.
[31:39.480 --> 31:43.080] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:43.080 --> 31:48.920] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7, over 1,200 architects
[31:48.920 --> 31:52.680] and engineers had looked into the evidence and believed there was more to the story.
[31:52.680 --> 31:54.160] Bring justice to my son.
[31:54.160 --> 31:55.160] My uncle.
[31:55.160 --> 31:56.160] My nephew.
[31:56.160 --> 31:57.160] My son.
[31:57.160 --> 31:58.160] Go to buildingwhat.org.
[31:58.160 --> 32:01.400] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.400 --> 32:06.000] Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[32:06.000 --> 32:12.320] Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th, from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time.
[32:12.320 --> 32:15.400] Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516.
[32:15.400 --> 32:20.440] Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father
[32:20.440 --> 32:22.000] which is in heaven.
[32:22.000 --> 32:27.120] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:27.120 --> 32:32.320] Bring Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed
[32:32.320 --> 32:35.480] to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:35.480 --> 32:39.880] Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss
[32:39.880 --> 32:41.640] one chapter per week.
[32:41.640 --> 32:46.720] Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as
[32:46.720 --> 32:48.920] Christian character development.
[32:48.920 --> 32:55.160] So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to
[32:55.160 --> 33:01.160] 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the scriptures.
[33:01.160 --> 33:10.160] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:10.160 --> 33:37.120] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we are Logos Radio and we're talking about
[33:37.120 --> 33:44.120] a strategy and I'm hoping that working with Aubrey that we've got a bunch of people here
[33:44.120 --> 33:46.680] that we can arm.
[33:46.680 --> 33:50.440] We want them going to the next election loaded for bear.
[33:50.440 --> 33:54.200] Is that right?
[33:54.200 --> 34:00.600] Instead of going down there hoping and making sure these guys don't do anything wrong, we
[34:00.600 --> 34:02.600] go down there hoping they will.
[34:02.600 --> 34:05.680] That's right, so we can catch them.
[34:05.680 --> 34:12.640] Just imagine, Aubrey, you're down there as a court watcher and you see something you
[34:12.640 --> 34:19.520] perceive to be wrong and instead of arguing with those people about it, you call 911 and
[34:19.520 --> 34:23.720] ask the policeman to come down and arrest them for it.
[34:23.720 --> 34:28.600] Now they're not explaining themselves to you, they're explaining themselves to someone
[34:28.600 --> 34:32.000] who matters.
[34:32.000 --> 34:35.000] It will change everything.
[34:35.000 --> 34:38.840] In fact, I did do something similar to that but it was before I got into this stuff, it
[34:38.840 --> 34:43.800] was actually on May 1st of this year, I was treated very poorly at my election center
[34:43.800 --> 34:46.640] when I had questions about the brand of voting machine.
[34:46.640 --> 34:50.240] They didn't have any information about the brand of voting machine and were extremely
[34:50.240 --> 34:51.240] rude with me.
[34:51.240 --> 34:55.600] Then they wouldn't print my slip to let me go and cast my ballot and I ended up calling
[34:55.600 --> 34:59.760] the police because they were trying to tell me to leave and I filmed myself.
[34:59.760 --> 35:04.360] They threatened me with arrest because I started to film but I was filming a crime in action.
[35:04.360 --> 35:09.720] They would not let me cast my ballot and there's no excuse for it, no reason for it.
[35:09.720 --> 35:15.280] The election judge, her name is Alice Dandy, I made a complaint against her in November
[35:15.280 --> 35:22.400] of 2020 because her and all of her staff, all of them were wearing BLM masks and shirt
[35:22.400 --> 35:26.240] inside the polling location and they were very, very rude.
[35:26.240 --> 35:30.680] I know BLM's not a political party but come on, yeah they are.
[35:30.680 --> 35:37.720] That was pretty bad and then this year, I was treated horribly and because they wouldn't
[35:37.720 --> 35:40.320] let me cast my ballot, I called the police.
[35:40.320 --> 35:44.520] There were plenty of witnesses, they all told the police what happened.
[35:44.520 --> 35:48.480] In the video, one of the poll workers, she tried to knock the phone out of my hand, she
[35:48.480 --> 35:52.160] physically touched me and I said, don't put your hands on me.
[35:52.160 --> 35:57.080] When the police got there, I showed them my video, all the witnesses spoke up and they
[35:57.080 --> 36:01.920] were ready to file assault charges against the poll workers and I very naively declined
[36:01.920 --> 36:05.520] and said, no, I'm not actually hurt, I just was trying to cast my ballot and find out
[36:05.520 --> 36:09.240] what brand of voting machines we use because I don't know how we vote in Texas.
[36:09.240 --> 36:13.040] I realize that I don't understand the voting machines here, you know.
[36:13.040 --> 36:24.200] Okay, let's see if we can't get you over your naivete, it hasn't been two years yet,
[36:24.200 --> 36:27.200] so you get to change your mind again.
[36:27.200 --> 36:28.200] Yes.
[36:28.200 --> 36:32.880] That bell has already been rung.
[36:32.880 --> 36:34.240] Right.
[36:34.240 --> 36:36.400] So very good to take her on.
[36:36.400 --> 36:42.880] Now, giving a complaint to a policeman is, that's not worth very much.
[36:42.880 --> 36:48.560] Now you get a statement by the policeman, he's going to have to write a report and it has
[36:48.560 --> 36:51.280] to be in a record somewhere, you want that report.
[36:51.280 --> 36:54.080] Sure, yeah, I can get it, yep.
[36:54.080 --> 37:03.560] Now we make up a criminal complaint and anybody who was there write up affidavits and we go
[37:03.560 --> 37:14.560] down to a magistrate or a justice of the peace or a judge who will be friendly to this group
[37:14.560 --> 37:22.680] and you go to court, the best time to go to do this is when they're having motion hearings
[37:22.680 --> 37:29.680] because at motion hearings there's lots of breaks and it takes them a minute to 30 seconds
[37:29.680 --> 37:32.800] to do a motion because they do the same ones over and over and over.
[37:32.800 --> 37:36.680] I do this all the time and you go to the bailiff, you call the bailiff over and you tell the
[37:36.680 --> 37:42.080] bailiff your name because you don't want any questions, instruct the judge that I have
[37:42.080 --> 37:47.720] business with the court and they will always say, may I tell the judge the nature of the
[37:47.720 --> 37:53.440] business and I have a couple of ways of doing that but the best way to do it is to hand
[37:53.440 --> 38:00.040] him a folder and say yes, give him this, make sure the folder is sealed with the judge's
[38:00.040 --> 38:02.040] name on it.
[38:02.040 --> 38:10.280] So if the bailiff starts to try to open it, I have business with the court and it's none
[38:10.280 --> 38:11.280] of yours.
[38:11.280 --> 38:18.720] If he continues to try to open it, you just holler at the judge, your honor and stop the
[38:18.720 --> 38:19.720] proceedings.
[38:19.720 --> 38:23.520] Oh, that is great fun to do that.
[38:23.520 --> 38:25.800] Okay, generally they won't.
[38:25.800 --> 38:30.080] They'll just take it and give it to the judge and tell the judge that certain Aubrey is
[38:30.080 --> 38:36.520] here and she has business with the court and hand him the hand of the folder.
[38:36.520 --> 38:43.080] I did that in Travis County with the head criminal district judge at Travis County,
[38:43.080 --> 38:44.880] Bob Perkins.
[38:44.880 --> 38:45.880] Really nice guy.
[38:45.880 --> 38:52.880] He was generally a nice guy and the bailiff, at this time I didn't give him the document.
[38:52.880 --> 38:56.880] He came up and told him, instruct the judge that I have business with the court and he
[38:56.880 --> 38:59.040] said, may I tell him the nature of the business?
[38:59.040 --> 39:00.040] No, you're not.
[39:00.040 --> 39:01.040] No, you may not.
[39:01.040 --> 39:03.120] I have business with the court and it's none of yours.
[39:03.120 --> 39:09.640] You're dismissed because I wanted him really P old and the judge saw me do that and I'm
[39:09.640 --> 39:11.880] standing here in a nice suit.
[39:11.880 --> 39:17.000] Lawyers go into court before the judges like meek little lambs are terrified of judges.
[39:17.000 --> 39:22.320] So he's got a guy in there messing with his bailiff who's clearly not impressed with his
[39:22.320 --> 39:26.880] bailiff and he's wondering who the heck is this guy.
[39:26.880 --> 39:30.120] So he finishes his hearing and he said, are you Randall Calton?
[39:30.120 --> 39:33.320] Yes, your honor, I am. I understand you have business with the court.
[39:33.320 --> 39:34.320] Yes, your honor, I do.
[39:34.320 --> 39:37.840] Well, he was having the hearings right up at the bench.
[39:37.840 --> 39:41.120] I said, I held up this red folder I had.
[39:41.120 --> 39:46.360] I always use a red folder because they see a red folder and they can't help themselves.
[39:46.360 --> 39:48.640] They got to know what's in it.
[39:48.640 --> 39:51.520] May I approach?
[39:51.520 --> 39:56.240] And may I approach means can I give you this folder?
[39:56.240 --> 40:02.880] And he said, well, come on up. I came up, put it on his bench and he opened it up and
[40:02.880 --> 40:08.560] he's looking at criminal complaints against the district clerk, accusing the district
[40:08.560 --> 40:15.040] clerk of shielding the district attorney from prosecution by failing to act in accordance
[40:15.040 --> 40:21.400] with 7.31 Texas code of crime procedure.
[40:21.400 --> 40:27.960] And I was accusing the district attorney of shielding all the highest judges in Texas
[40:27.960 --> 40:31.680] from prosecution.
[40:31.680 --> 40:39.400] He looked at that and I could see he was envisioning his whole career past before his eyes.
[40:39.400 --> 40:41.520] He said, this is about me.
[40:41.520 --> 40:42.520] Wait a second.
[40:42.520 --> 40:44.520] This is going to get ugly.
[40:44.520 --> 40:46.520] And he was right, it did get ugly.
[40:46.520 --> 40:50.960] I did wind up getting all of the judges of the court of criminal appeals put in front
[40:50.960 --> 40:51.960] of the grand jury.
[40:51.960 --> 40:52.960] Oh, that's beautiful.
[40:52.960 --> 40:53.960] Just one guy.
[40:53.960 --> 40:58.960] Imagine what we could do with your group.
[40:58.960 --> 40:59.960] Yeah.
[40:59.960 --> 41:05.240] If I can get them to focus and that, you know, I've got two different groups that came with
[41:05.240 --> 41:09.880] affidavits and one group took them to the Tarrant County DA.
[41:09.880 --> 41:12.880] Of course, she didn't actually look at them.
[41:12.880 --> 41:18.160] They sent her to one of the underlings and he looked at their affidavits of violations
[41:18.160 --> 41:21.160] of, of course, I don't think that they actually cited this code.
[41:21.160 --> 41:26.440] I told them to do, but I don't know if they did, but it was 13.002C7, which is the registration
[41:26.440 --> 41:27.440] application requirement.
[41:27.440 --> 41:32.440] They were, they were, they looked like unlawful registrations right on their face for, you
[41:32.440 --> 41:35.280] know, where people were casting ballots from.
[41:35.280 --> 41:38.320] And it's like, well, if they're registered at this address and this address is not a
[41:38.320 --> 41:40.320] real address, that's unlawful.
[41:40.320 --> 41:45.960] And they actually took all of this stuff to the district attorney and they literally said,
[41:45.960 --> 41:49.520] well, you're going to have to prove that those aren't unlawful because they could have registered
[41:49.520 --> 41:52.160] with a lawful address and just received mail there.
[41:52.160 --> 41:53.160] And then.
[41:53.160 --> 41:54.160] Wonderful.
[41:54.160 --> 41:55.160] Okay.
[41:55.160 --> 41:56.160] Hold on.
[41:56.160 --> 42:00.640] Brett, you want to tell them about, tell Aubrey about article 2.03.
[42:00.640 --> 42:06.400] Let's see, is that the neglect of duty?
[42:06.400 --> 42:09.320] That's the complaint against the public official.
[42:09.320 --> 42:10.320] Yeah.
[42:10.320 --> 42:15.400] So if you give something to a district attorney or a county attorney, they don't have any
[42:15.400 --> 42:16.400] discretion.
[42:16.400 --> 42:21.160] They can't just choose whether or not they're going to deal with this or, well, oh, actually
[42:21.160 --> 42:22.160] that means this.
[42:22.160 --> 42:23.160] I think it'll be all right.
[42:23.160 --> 42:25.000] They don't get that discretion.
[42:25.000 --> 42:27.080] They must give it to the grand jury.
[42:27.080 --> 42:29.920] That's the only choice they have.
[42:29.920 --> 42:38.520] Under article 2.03, it, it, a prosecuting attorney, yeah, in the Texas Constitution.
[42:38.520 --> 42:42.200] No, no, no, no, criminal procedure.
[42:42.200 --> 42:46.600] Discode of criminal procedure, article 2.03.
[42:46.600 --> 42:52.120] It shall be the duty of the attorney representing the state to present by information to the
[42:52.120 --> 42:57.760] court having jurisdiction any officer for neglect or failure of any duty enjoined on
[42:57.760 --> 42:59.800] such officer.
[42:59.800 --> 43:05.680] When such failure or neglect, neglect or failure can be presented by information, whenever
[43:05.680 --> 43:11.000] it shall come to the knowledge of said attorney that there has been a neglect of failure duty
[43:11.000 --> 43:13.080] upon the part of said officer.
[43:13.080 --> 43:17.880] And see, that was, if it can be presented by information.
[43:17.880 --> 43:23.960] And he shall bring to the notice of the grand jury any act of violation of law or neglect
[43:23.960 --> 43:24.960] of failure or duty.
[43:24.960 --> 43:28.480] Now we've got the law in there too.
[43:28.480 --> 43:35.120] Upon the part of any officer, when such violation, neglect or failure is not presented by information
[43:35.120 --> 43:39.400] and whenever the same may come to his knowledge.
[43:39.400 --> 43:44.880] So the moment you brought that to his attention, this duty was invoked and he doesn't have
[43:44.880 --> 43:45.880] any out.
[43:45.880 --> 43:49.400] He doesn't get any kind of, choose to decide whether, well.
[43:49.400 --> 43:54.640] Well, and also, he doesn't get to dive off the cliff.
[43:54.640 --> 44:00.720] This Randy Cowell and Brett Fountain Rural Radio will be right back.
[44:00.720 --> 44:06.760] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.760 --> 44:11.520] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.520 --> 44:17.160] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.160 --> 44:22.640] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[44:22.640 --> 44:26.000] Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[44:26.000 --> 44:30.640] Logo's radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[44:30.640 --> 44:31.640] we reject.
[44:31.640 --> 44:34.200] We have come to trust Jevity so much.
[44:34.200 --> 44:39.800] We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:39.800 --> 44:46.160] When you order from Logo's Radio Network.com, your health will improve as you help support
[44:46.160 --> 44:47.160] quality radio.
[44:47.160 --> 44:51.800] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:51.800 --> 44:57.320] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[44:57.320 --> 44:59.320] increase your income.
[44:59.320 --> 45:00.320] Order now.
[45:00.320 --> 45:04.440] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.440 --> 45:11.200] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[45:11.200 --> 45:14.200] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:14.200 --> 45:18.960] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.960 --> 45:23.160] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.160 --> 45:28.120] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.120 --> 45:34.800] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.800 --> 45:39.320] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:39.320 --> 45:43.640] the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.640 --> 45:49.840] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.840 --> 45:52.200] pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.200 --> 46:00.320] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.200 --> 46:33.120] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and talking to Aubrey
[46:33.120 --> 46:34.120] in Texas.
[46:34.120 --> 46:41.760] And Aubrey, I hope your sinister mind is churning.
[46:41.760 --> 46:47.360] We don't go to the prosecuting attorney to get him to do his job.
[46:47.360 --> 46:54.640] We go to the prosecuting attorney to get him not to do his job.
[46:54.640 --> 46:59.160] Most of the time, you go to the prosecutor, and he doesn't do anything you feel defeated
[46:59.160 --> 47:06.320] and betrayed and miserable and frustrated, no, no, no, we got to fix that.
[47:06.320 --> 47:10.600] We're only asking you to do this because we don't want you to.
[47:10.600 --> 47:16.600] If you do this, you're going to ruin all our fun because now we can't bring you to the
[47:16.600 --> 47:19.200] jury.
[47:19.200 --> 47:24.840] And we've got a couple of things that were put into place for us.
[47:24.840 --> 47:28.440] Travis County has a public integrity unit.
[47:28.440 --> 47:33.320] Well, that's illegal.
[47:33.320 --> 47:39.760] They had one, and the legislature took it away from them and gave it to the Texas Rangers.
[47:39.760 --> 47:46.400] And so any complaints against a public official goes to the Texas Rangers now, and the Texas
[47:46.400 --> 47:49.960] Rangers have to investigate into it.
[47:49.960 --> 47:55.720] And if the prosecuting attorney authorizes them to, the legislature told the Texas Rangers
[47:55.720 --> 47:58.000] to set up their own protocols.
[47:58.000 --> 48:03.520] And the first protocol was they couldn't investigate a public official without the commission of
[48:03.520 --> 48:05.960] the prosecuting attorney.
[48:05.960 --> 48:15.120] And this was the case before they had the, this was the Texas Ranger law before the
[48:15.120 --> 48:20.080] legislature gave them the duty to investigate public officials.
[48:20.080 --> 48:22.440] So they put that provision back in.
[48:22.440 --> 48:29.560] The whole idea of getting rid of public integrity units was to force the prosecutors to act
[48:29.560 --> 48:32.600] in accordance with 2.03.
[48:32.600 --> 48:35.440] So they get it, they get it right back.
[48:35.440 --> 48:41.880] So we go to the Texas Rangers, but only with criminal complaints against the prosecuting
[48:41.880 --> 48:50.000] attorney, go ahead Bubba, ask him for permission to investigate him.
[48:50.000 --> 48:53.040] We'll see how that works out for you.
[48:53.040 --> 49:00.000] Then we go after the Texas Rangers, we go after the director of the Rangers personally,
[49:00.000 --> 49:06.800] accuse him criminally as respondeat superior because he established the protocol.
[49:06.800 --> 49:15.240] So now we're trying to get the colonel arrested, he is not going to be a happy camper.
[49:15.240 --> 49:19.840] And there are people out there that will, that will say, well, you know, they're not
[49:19.840 --> 49:23.840] going to, some people will say, you know, I try to run some of this stuff down, some
[49:23.840 --> 49:25.960] of this stuff by other people.
[49:25.960 --> 49:27.360] And they say, oh, it's not going to work.
[49:27.360 --> 49:28.360] They're not going to work.
[49:28.360 --> 49:29.360] You know what?
[49:29.360 --> 49:32.520] I don't, we don't need it to work exactly how, you know, you think that it might, oh,
[49:32.520 --> 49:34.160] everybody goes to jail.
[49:34.160 --> 49:38.520] It's just effective enough that people understand that they very well may go to jail, they very
[49:38.520 --> 49:39.520] well may.
[49:39.520 --> 49:40.520] Exactly.
[49:40.520 --> 49:46.480] So you're going to tell, you tell me to go do this, they try to put me in jail for that.
[49:46.480 --> 49:49.000] You want that done, you go out and do it.
[49:49.000 --> 49:50.000] Right.
[49:50.000 --> 49:51.000] Exactly.
[49:51.000 --> 49:52.000] That reduces it right there.
[49:52.000 --> 49:56.200] That just by putting them on notice reduces the likelihood that they're going to continue
[49:56.200 --> 49:57.200] to violate.
[49:57.200 --> 50:02.760] And the feeling, feeling sort of, you know, discouraged is a really big issue because
[50:02.760 --> 50:03.760] these same people.
[50:03.760 --> 50:08.520] And these people worked their butts off to identify all of these suspicious registry,
[50:08.520 --> 50:12.480] suspicious addresses where ballots were being cast from.
[50:12.480 --> 50:15.160] And he literally just told them, no, you're going to have to prove to me that those are
[50:15.160 --> 50:16.160] unlawful.
[50:16.160 --> 50:19.680] But I told her, I said, well, look, he said, because they could be registered, you know,
[50:19.680 --> 50:23.000] within, within the county at a real address, they just received their mail somewhere else.
[50:23.000 --> 50:26.120] I said, but that would be on him to prove.
[50:26.120 --> 50:28.440] I said, why would you all leave?
[50:28.440 --> 50:29.440] Exactly.
[50:29.440 --> 50:32.480] I would have been like, okay, no, I'm sorry.
[50:32.480 --> 50:37.160] But FU, you prove it because it should be easy for you because you've got all of the
[50:37.160 --> 50:39.240] voter registration application form.
[50:39.240 --> 50:44.160] So how about we open records, request all of those and let's see who's actually registering
[50:44.160 --> 50:50.920] people at NC Laws and the courthouse and PO boxes.
[50:50.920 --> 50:56.200] And we won't, we won't have time for today, but we have a whole routine, how to go after
[50:56.200 --> 51:02.120] the prosecuting attorney and make the prosecutor's life a living hell.
[51:02.120 --> 51:03.920] And it'll be fun to go after Sharon Wilson.
[51:03.920 --> 51:09.640] I interviewed her on this program before she got elected and she promised to do all of
[51:09.640 --> 51:11.640] these things, none of which she's done.
[51:11.640 --> 51:14.880] Oh, I'm going to remind her of that.
[51:14.880 --> 51:15.880] You remember Randy?
[51:15.880 --> 51:16.880] Yeah.
[51:16.880 --> 51:17.880] And he remembers you.
[51:17.880 --> 51:18.880] So good.
[51:18.880 --> 51:19.880] Okay.
[51:19.880 --> 51:23.880] We need to go on to other callers.
[51:23.880 --> 51:24.880] Thank you so much.
[51:24.880 --> 51:27.320] I'll see everybody one day.
[51:27.320 --> 51:31.120] Give the date and time and address of this meeting again.
[51:31.120 --> 51:36.600] So this is going to be this coming Monday, October 4th, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the
[51:36.600 --> 51:38.800] Rail Club Live in Fort Worth.
[51:38.800 --> 51:41.240] That's 3101 Joyce Drive.
[51:41.240 --> 51:42.240] It is a bar.
[51:42.240 --> 51:43.240] It's a Patriot owned bar.
[51:43.240 --> 51:44.240] We're supporting it.
[51:44.240 --> 51:49.720] They are a victim of Betsy Price and her coronavirus lockdown mandate.
[51:49.720 --> 51:52.320] So we're out there and then Randy is the featured speaker.
[51:52.320 --> 51:53.320] We have Kelly Sorrell.
[51:53.320 --> 51:56.640] She's a constitutional attorney, Susan Valiant.
[51:56.640 --> 51:57.800] She's a precinct chair.
[51:57.800 --> 52:01.160] We have Jeff Rees from the Convention of States.
[52:01.160 --> 52:05.160] He's a regional captain from the Convention of States as well.
[52:05.160 --> 52:07.920] And then we've got a couple local candidates who are going to come up and say a few words
[52:07.920 --> 52:10.800] as well just to kind of talk about their position on everything.
[52:10.800 --> 52:12.280] So I'm really excited.
[52:12.280 --> 52:13.920] It's $20 to get in.
[52:13.920 --> 52:18.920] We're fundraising for the rail and basically we want to support Patriots doing patriotic
[52:18.920 --> 52:19.920] things.
[52:19.920 --> 52:20.920] So we want to pay everybody.
[52:20.920 --> 52:21.920] Everybody make money.
[52:21.920 --> 52:22.920] Everyone's happy.
[52:22.920 --> 52:24.720] And we're taking back our country.
[52:24.720 --> 52:25.960] Okay.
[52:25.960 --> 52:26.960] Thank you very much.
[52:26.960 --> 52:27.960] Thank you.
[52:27.960 --> 52:29.960] And I'll see you Monday.
[52:29.960 --> 52:30.960] Yes.
[52:30.960 --> 52:31.960] Thank you.
[52:31.960 --> 52:32.960] Okay.
[52:32.960 --> 52:38.800] Now we're going to go to on-screen call 808.
[52:38.800 --> 52:44.640] It looks like we have a bunch of first-time callers.
[52:44.640 --> 52:51.880] If you are in the 808 area code, give us the first name in a state.
[52:51.880 --> 52:53.960] My name is Ron and I live in Hawaii.
[52:53.960 --> 52:55.840] Oh, okay.
[52:55.840 --> 52:57.040] My name is...
[52:57.040 --> 52:58.040] You on?
[52:58.040 --> 52:59.040] Ron.
[52:59.040 --> 53:00.040] Ron.
[53:00.040 --> 53:01.040] Oh, Ron.
[53:01.040 --> 53:02.040] Ron.
[53:02.040 --> 53:03.040] Okay.
[53:03.040 --> 53:04.040] Yes.
[53:04.040 --> 53:05.040] Yes.
[53:05.040 --> 53:06.040] Okay.
[53:06.040 --> 53:07.040] What do you have for us today?
[53:07.040 --> 53:08.040] Okay.
[53:08.040 --> 53:17.360] I care to take a large subdivision here on the big island of Hawaii and the subdivision
[53:17.360 --> 53:18.360] is incorporated.
[53:18.360 --> 53:20.720] I'll put that up front.
[53:20.720 --> 53:26.360] They want to put in a cell phone tower into the neighborhood and they've broken or they
[53:26.360 --> 53:33.600] haven't followed the needs and covenants of the association.
[53:33.600 --> 53:38.760] Some homeowners took the...
[53:38.760 --> 53:42.400] Basically, they filed a motion.
[53:42.400 --> 53:47.960] I don't know exactly how they did it legally, but they went into court and because the
[53:47.960 --> 53:54.080] Homeowners Association chair didn't follow what's written in the deeds of the Homeowners
[53:54.080 --> 53:59.640] Association, they were able to stop the construction of the cell tower.
[53:59.640 --> 54:00.640] Then the cell tower...
[54:00.640 --> 54:01.640] It was AT&T.
[54:01.640 --> 54:09.320] AT&T sued the state of Hawaii and got them to overturn the local planning department
[54:09.320 --> 54:14.360] to rescind the stoppage of the cell tower.
[54:14.360 --> 54:17.440] It's actually in construction now.
[54:17.440 --> 54:23.360] Like I said, I'm not a resident of the neighborhood, it's just 200 yards down where I live.
[54:23.360 --> 54:24.360] We don't really...
[54:24.360 --> 54:28.520] A lot of people don't want it in the neighborhood and I'm trying to help to give them guidance
[54:28.520 --> 54:32.760] on where they can go legally in order to stop this.
[54:32.760 --> 54:43.040] Well, it appears as though the real issue you have is with the Homeowners Association.
[54:43.040 --> 54:50.840] Well, from what I've told this morning when I talked to the lady who's a resident who's
[54:50.840 --> 54:58.080] trying to stop this, normally there are nine people on the board in the Homeowners Association,
[54:58.080 --> 55:05.520] but currently only three spaces are occupied and from what she told me, one of them, basically
[55:05.520 --> 55:10.240] the chair of it is based back in like a king.
[55:10.240 --> 55:20.640] Okay, then their option is to sue the Homeowners Association and then sue to void the contract.
[55:20.640 --> 55:24.760] This is what I told her, but I don't know the legal mechanisms in order to do that
[55:24.760 --> 55:30.400] because I actually recommend that they create some notice of liability and go after the
[55:30.400 --> 55:35.040] head of the Homeowners Association, the person who signed the contract with AT&T and the
[55:35.040 --> 55:37.840] person who signed the contract with the planning department.
[55:37.840 --> 55:43.120] Yes, and sue them personally, but that always gets their attention.
[55:43.120 --> 55:49.320] Yeah, what my recommendation was is you create a notice of liability for all of these three
[55:49.320 --> 55:53.760] folks that signed this contract, but you get 100 people to actually send in a notice of
[55:53.760 --> 55:54.760] liability.
[55:54.760 --> 56:00.840] So they basically just get slammed with 100 plus notice of liabilities for each one of
[56:00.840 --> 56:02.840] those three people.
[56:02.840 --> 56:12.840] Oh, so they've already received a tort letter, tort letter is a notice and opportunity to
[56:12.840 --> 56:15.840] cure.
[56:15.840 --> 56:18.640] I'm not sure, I just don't have the background.
[56:18.640 --> 56:26.400] Okay, if they send in a notice of liability, then that will act as a tort letter and the
[56:26.400 --> 56:31.640] courts want you to give notice before you use the courts.
[56:31.640 --> 56:37.640] The courts say that they don't want you to use the court as your remedy of first resort,
[56:37.640 --> 56:40.840] but rather as your remedy of last resort.
[56:40.840 --> 56:48.200] So they want you to exercise your administrative remedies before you bring it to the court.
[56:48.200 --> 56:56.640] But fortunately, the only administrative remedy they require is that you give notice and opportunity,
[56:56.640 --> 56:59.200] notice an opportunity to cure.
[56:59.200 --> 57:03.800] And that's in the form of a tort letter, you say, I've been harmed.
[57:03.800 --> 57:06.120] I've been harmed in this amount.
[57:06.120 --> 57:11.040] Make me hold every suit and you explain the nature of the harm.
[57:11.040 --> 57:12.640] Now they've been given notice.
[57:12.640 --> 57:20.280] That's the only administrative remedy you have to exercise, then you file suit against them.
[57:20.280 --> 57:26.720] And in the suit, you ask for restraining order to stop the construction.
[57:26.720 --> 57:33.000] Because if you win the suit, then any extra construction will just create a more added
[57:33.000 --> 57:37.560] cost and harm to AT&T.
[57:37.560 --> 57:42.080] Now, when you say that, I should see them.
[57:42.080 --> 57:47.840] Are you talking about just the Homeowners Association or should I go after?
[57:47.840 --> 57:50.240] You don't have a claim against AT&T.
[57:50.240 --> 57:55.360] AT&T entered into a contract with the Homeowners Association.
[57:55.360 --> 58:01.400] They're ostensibly in good faith, or at least they can make the claim of in good faith because
[58:01.400 --> 58:12.000] the Homeowners Association is the one who has the standing to issue contracts for the property
[58:12.000 --> 58:14.560] that's under the Homeowners' D restrictions.
[58:14.560 --> 58:20.080] So they're the only ones AT&T is required to deal with.
[58:20.080 --> 58:24.680] The Homeowners Association is required to deal with all of the members.
[58:24.680 --> 58:29.200] So it is the Homeowners' Association that answers to the members.
[58:29.200 --> 58:31.200] So that's who you would sue.
[58:31.200 --> 58:42.800] But if you sue them personally, the problem is, if AT&T sues the Homeowners' Association,
[58:42.800 --> 58:46.440] they can bankrupt the Homeowners' Association.
[58:46.440 --> 58:50.440] So these officials can wind up bankrupting the home.
[58:50.440 --> 58:54.560] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.560 --> 58:59.760] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.760 --> 59:01.080] can really help.
[59:01.080 --> 59:05.440] The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.440 --> 59:06.440] today.
[59:06.440 --> 59:10.440] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.440 --> 59:13.560] to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.560 --> 59:18.800] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.800 --> 59:23.080] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan
[59:23.080 --> 59:28.000] of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.040] To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:33.040 --> 59:49.320] Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.320 --> 01:00:00.880] Thank you very much for watching this video and don't forget to subscribe to our channel
[01:00:00.880 --> 01:00:01.880] for more videos.
[01:00:01.880 --> 01:00:10.880] Thank you very much for watching this video and don't forget to click on the bell to get
[01:00:10.880 --> 01:00:23.400] notified when we update you.
[01:00:23.400 --> 01:00:27.960] Okay people!
[01:00:27.960 --> 01:00:40.760] $1.52, Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $1.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10
[01:00:40.760 --> 01:00:41.760] of CryptoCoin.
[01:00:41.760 --> 01:00:52.560] In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[01:00:52.560 --> 01:00:57.880] on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[01:00:57.880 --> 01:01:04.880] 10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:01:04.880 --> 01:01:09.560] And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing HEPA to
[01:01:09.560 --> 01:01:14.240] tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin
[01:01:14.240 --> 01:01:18.200] and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:01:18.200 --> 01:01:22.400] new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:01:22.400 --> 01:01:24.840] equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:01:24.840 --> 01:01:28.560] Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:01:28.560 --> 01:01:33.160] she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:01:33.160 --> 01:01:34.160] law.
[01:01:34.160 --> 01:01:37.720] Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:01:37.720 --> 01:01:42.200] to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:42.200 --> 01:01:48.400] in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB1325 works, as
[01:01:48.400 --> 01:01:51.360] well as other cities too, like the District Attorney.
[01:01:51.360 --> 01:01:57.480] In El Paso, Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote,
[01:01:57.480 --> 01:02:02.000] will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:06.880] However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[01:02:06.880 --> 01:02:10.880] in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[01:02:10.880 --> 01:02:13.600] something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.600 --> 01:02:17.520] It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[01:02:17.520 --> 01:02:22.720] charged with.
[01:02:22.720 --> 01:02:27.400] A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark
[01:02:27.400 --> 01:02:32.520] as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[01:02:32.520 --> 01:02:38.160] shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[01:02:38.160 --> 01:02:39.640] Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.640 --> 01:02:43.960] According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[01:02:43.960 --> 01:02:50.200] its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[01:02:50.200 --> 01:03:17.760] glow.
[01:03:17.760 --> 01:03:29.960] Okay.
[01:03:29.960 --> 01:03:30.960] We are back.
[01:03:30.960 --> 01:03:35.480] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Ron and Hawaii.
[01:03:35.480 --> 01:03:40.560] Okay, Ron, that's the position they're in.
[01:03:40.560 --> 01:03:45.040] They're going to have to see the homeowners association.
[01:03:45.040 --> 01:03:48.480] Do you have any other questions?
[01:03:48.480 --> 01:03:49.480] Here's the question.
[01:03:49.480 --> 01:03:56.800] Is the first time that the homeowners association tried to stop it, the state of Hawaii Planning
[01:03:56.800 --> 01:04:00.280] Commission ruled in their favor and stopped it.
[01:04:00.280 --> 01:04:08.040] So the Planning Commission knew that the homeowners association had broken their own bylaw, yet
[01:04:08.040 --> 01:04:11.520] they acquiesced when AT&T sued the Planning Department.
[01:04:11.520 --> 01:04:16.440] So doesn't present the state of Hawaii Planning Department have skin in the game now because
[01:04:16.440 --> 01:04:21.920] they knew that they had violated their own bylaw, yet they allowed it to continue?
[01:04:21.920 --> 01:04:26.360] Okay, here's a problem you have.
[01:04:26.360 --> 01:04:29.600] You're stuck with state law.
[01:04:29.600 --> 01:04:37.640] We had a shopping center here in Fort Worth, you know, where I'm from, and they wanted
[01:04:37.640 --> 01:04:46.560] to extend to the south into what was then a housing area that had been there for 50
[01:04:46.560 --> 01:04:52.080] years, because they claimed if they condemned all these properties, purchased them, tore
[01:04:52.080 --> 01:04:58.760] down all the buildings, and then sold us to the shopping center, they could generate
[01:04:58.760 --> 01:04:59.760] more tax revenue.
[01:04:59.760 --> 01:05:01.960] Man, Hirsch did the same thing.
[01:05:01.960 --> 01:05:04.320] That's what I'm talking about.
[01:05:04.320 --> 01:05:13.680] The Northeast Mall, so it went to the U.S. Supreme, and the U.S. Supreme said, yep, they
[01:05:13.680 --> 01:05:15.440] can do that.
[01:05:15.440 --> 01:05:19.080] And when that ruling came down, we got a lot of the patriots just jumping up and down
[01:05:19.080 --> 01:05:23.280] and waving their arms and railing in righteous indignation.
[01:05:23.280 --> 01:05:28.160] And I read the ruling and said, guys, you got to be careful what you ask for.
[01:05:28.160 --> 01:05:34.800] What the Supreme said is that this is a state law issue.
[01:05:34.800 --> 01:05:41.040] How property is handled is a state issue, not a federal issue.
[01:05:41.040 --> 01:05:48.680] If you don't want the state to have the power to do this, you have to change the law.
[01:05:48.680 --> 01:05:50.720] That's the problem you have.
[01:05:50.720 --> 01:05:59.240] If Hawaii's state law allows the state itself to authorize this particular use of property,
[01:05:59.240 --> 01:06:02.680] you're not going to win that fight.
[01:06:02.680 --> 01:06:08.080] Okay, so let's hypothetically say that the state of Hawaii doesn't have that right.
[01:06:08.080 --> 01:06:13.920] They just over whatever reason.
[01:06:13.920 --> 01:06:16.120] Perfect question.
[01:06:16.120 --> 01:06:22.080] If the state does not specifically have the authority to condemn this property, because
[01:06:22.080 --> 01:06:28.160] that's essentially what they're doing, by authorizing a use of the property against
[01:06:28.160 --> 01:06:30.840] the wishes and intent of the property owners.
[01:06:30.840 --> 01:06:38.480] Now, did I understand you right that the Homeowners Association originally resisted this
[01:06:38.480 --> 01:06:39.480] construction?
[01:06:39.480 --> 01:06:40.480] Again.
[01:06:40.480 --> 01:06:41.480] No.
[01:06:41.480 --> 01:06:42.480] Okay.
[01:06:42.480 --> 01:06:52.880] If the Homeowners Association is acting in accordance with the court order, you have
[01:06:52.880 --> 01:06:55.360] no claim against the Homeowners Association.
[01:06:55.360 --> 01:07:02.360] The only one you have a claim against is the state.
[01:07:02.360 --> 01:07:11.840] But if the state has essentially imminent domain in this regard, then there's not anything
[01:07:11.840 --> 01:07:15.760] you can do except get the law changed.
[01:07:15.760 --> 01:07:21.720] And that wouldn't help you because the law was in place at the time this tower was put
[01:07:21.720 --> 01:07:22.720] in.
[01:07:22.720 --> 01:07:33.360] Well, the original legal mechanism that the Homeowners Association used, they were actually
[01:07:33.360 --> 01:07:38.720] by the, I don't know if it was through a court or if it was by the Planning Commission,
[01:07:38.720 --> 01:07:41.920] sided in their favor and stopped the construction.
[01:07:41.920 --> 01:07:47.280] It wasn't only, like I say, it wasn't until the AT&T sued the state of Hawaii in order
[01:07:47.280 --> 01:07:56.480] to give it a return, even though it was, to me, by overturning it, they violated the
[01:07:56.480 --> 01:07:58.640] bylaws of the Homeowners Association.
[01:07:58.640 --> 01:08:03.240] Well, the state is not bound to the bylaws of the Homeowners Association.
[01:08:03.240 --> 01:08:06.720] So they're not going to care about those.
[01:08:06.720 --> 01:08:11.480] Have you looked at the suit itself to determine if the suit was properly adjudicated?
[01:08:11.480 --> 01:08:13.880] Is that I don't know.
[01:08:13.880 --> 01:08:16.600] I'm not familiar with it enough.
[01:08:16.600 --> 01:08:27.360] You'd have to look at the suit where the state rendered a ruling that gave AT&T authority
[01:08:27.360 --> 01:08:29.480] to move ahead.
[01:08:29.480 --> 01:08:33.280] That's where your remedy is going to be if the root isn't one.
[01:08:33.280 --> 01:08:40.200] But I'm just, there's not going to be one.
[01:08:40.200 --> 01:08:43.840] You're tilting at a very large windmill here.
[01:08:43.840 --> 01:08:49.840] I understand that, but I, okay, it's, when you read some of the bylaws, it's crystal
[01:08:49.840 --> 01:08:52.680] clear in there that...
[01:08:52.680 --> 01:08:53.680] Bylaws are meaningless.
[01:08:53.680 --> 01:08:55.680] This is a state issue.
[01:08:55.680 --> 01:08:56.680] Okay.
[01:08:56.680 --> 01:09:02.160] Even though the Homeowners Association is incorporated, it's still a state issue.
[01:09:02.160 --> 01:09:09.120] If they've been ordered by the state, the state law will trump any bylaws of the Homeowners
[01:09:09.120 --> 01:09:10.120] Association.
[01:09:10.120 --> 01:09:11.120] Okay.
[01:09:11.120 --> 01:09:16.520] Oh, that's not a specific good news.
[01:09:16.520 --> 01:09:17.680] That will not give you...
[01:09:17.680 --> 01:09:21.280] You probably don't have a fight here.
[01:09:21.280 --> 01:09:22.280] Okay.
[01:09:22.280 --> 01:09:25.680] But look at the suit.
[01:09:25.680 --> 01:09:33.800] Look at the ruling that gave AT&T authority to move ahead and see if you can raise issues
[01:09:33.800 --> 01:09:35.200] with that suit.
[01:09:35.200 --> 01:09:36.200] Okay.
[01:09:36.200 --> 01:09:37.200] I understand.
[01:09:37.200 --> 01:09:38.200] Okay.
[01:09:38.200 --> 01:09:39.680] Well, thanks for your help and thanks for what you guys do.
[01:09:39.680 --> 01:09:41.800] I really truly do appreciate them.
[01:09:41.800 --> 01:09:42.800] Okay.
[01:09:42.800 --> 01:09:46.000] And I'm sorry I couldn't give you the answer you wanted.
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:48.000] That's okay.
[01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:51.160] It's like being married.
[01:09:51.160 --> 01:09:52.160] Okay.
[01:09:52.160 --> 01:09:53.160] Thank you.
[01:09:53.160 --> 01:09:54.160] Thank you very much.
[01:09:54.160 --> 01:09:58.760] Let's go to what appears to be another first-time caller.
[01:09:58.760 --> 01:10:06.840] If you are in the 812 area code, speak up and give us a name and state.
[01:10:06.840 --> 01:10:08.840] First name.
[01:10:08.840 --> 01:10:12.240] Mark in Indiana.
[01:10:12.240 --> 01:10:13.240] Mark in Indiana.
[01:10:13.240 --> 01:10:23.440] I used to live in Illinois right next to Indiana and we used to stand in Illinois and
[01:10:23.440 --> 01:10:26.440] I'm not going to tell you what we did in Indiana.
[01:10:26.440 --> 01:10:37.000] I'm only going to tell you stories like this Randy that had differences in state laws and
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:38.880] things like that I believe.
[01:10:38.880 --> 01:10:39.880] Yeah.
[01:10:39.880 --> 01:10:44.360] I think Illinois had Indiana swamped when it comes to corruption.
[01:10:44.360 --> 01:10:45.360] Oh yeah.
[01:10:45.360 --> 01:10:46.360] Yeah.
[01:10:46.360 --> 01:10:51.480] They got us completely whooped to that area.
[01:10:51.480 --> 01:10:52.480] Okay.
[01:10:52.480 --> 01:10:55.480] What do you have for us today?
[01:10:55.480 --> 01:11:09.280] Well, a couple, three weeks ago you had asked for cases involving masks, etcetera, combinations
[01:11:09.280 --> 01:11:16.160] and all that on projects that you're working on and I sent you a couple of emails.
[01:11:16.160 --> 01:11:22.160] I don't know if you've seen them or not but I sent you a couple emails with my particular
[01:11:22.160 --> 01:11:23.160] situation.
[01:11:23.160 --> 01:11:35.160] Short synopsis and I can give you a good timeline run down, etcetera, a short synopsis is this.
[01:11:35.160 --> 01:11:48.880] I was terminated last year due to my abject refusal to consent to wear a mask and I can
[01:11:48.880 --> 01:11:52.400] fill in details there anyway.
[01:11:52.400 --> 01:12:03.040] I decided early this year to file a complaint with the EEOC, did that in February, started
[01:12:03.040 --> 01:12:18.280] the process in February, didn't get a initial meeting until May got the charge of discrimination
[01:12:18.280 --> 01:12:25.520] filed on the 18th, specifically- Did you do a discrimination charge under the America's
[01:12:25.520 --> 01:12:27.520] Disabilities Act?
[01:12:27.520 --> 01:12:28.520] Yes.
[01:12:28.520 --> 01:12:35.640] Due to my history of respiratory illnesses.
[01:12:35.640 --> 01:12:42.560] Okay, are you familiar with our telegram sites?
[01:12:42.560 --> 01:12:44.920] I am, yes.
[01:12:44.920 --> 01:12:50.680] I haven't been on there much but I am familiar with them, yes.
[01:12:50.680 --> 01:12:57.400] Go to the mask telegram site, go all the way to the bottom, just before the show I loaded
[01:12:57.400 --> 01:13:05.000] up a treatment, we have some people that the airline is threatening to fire us that don't
[01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:12.520] wear masks and they made her an offer and we prepared a counter offer which amounted
[01:13:12.520 --> 01:13:16.320] to a cease and desist request.
[01:13:16.320 --> 01:13:20.560] I just loaded that up, it's about 30 pages, have a look at it.
[01:13:20.560 --> 01:13:30.040] I have a set of research studies in there indicating the problems with the mask and
[01:13:30.040 --> 01:13:40.120] they are extensive and that's something you can bring to the EEOC issue as supporting
[01:13:40.120 --> 01:13:48.920] your medical exemption issue.
[01:13:48.920 --> 01:13:51.560] Can you hear my daughter back there in the background?
[01:13:51.560 --> 01:13:54.240] I can't hear anything.
[01:13:54.240 --> 01:13:57.240] Okay, good, good.
[01:13:57.240 --> 01:14:05.240] Well, just so you know Randy, this has moved past mediation and it went into investigation.
[01:14:05.240 --> 01:14:11.920] In other words, I told them my price for basically breach of contract if you want to get right
[01:14:11.920 --> 01:14:20.840] down into it and they of course came back with goose egg which is to be expected.
[01:14:20.840 --> 01:14:21.840] Yes.
[01:14:21.840 --> 01:14:23.240] So, go ahead.
[01:14:23.240 --> 01:14:29.080] So, you are in with the EEOC.
[01:14:29.080 --> 01:14:37.440] This will likely require a civil suit so don't worry about what they do here.
[01:14:37.440 --> 01:14:43.520] The worst they act here, the better it will work for you at the end of the day when you
[01:14:43.520 --> 01:14:45.800] file suit against them.
[01:14:45.800 --> 01:14:54.200] Understood and I don't have any illusions about the outcome because you know I think
[01:14:54.200 --> 01:15:00.720] it's like 92% of the time the EEOC finds no fault with the employer.
[01:15:00.720 --> 01:15:03.920] Okay, you don't care about that.
[01:15:03.920 --> 01:15:04.920] Question.
[01:15:04.920 --> 01:15:05.920] Right.
[01:15:05.920 --> 01:15:15.840] How does the EEOC complaint affect your standing to sue the employer?
[01:15:15.840 --> 01:15:25.280] The way they work that is they'll come back and generally, like I said, say that there
[01:15:25.280 --> 01:15:33.240] was no discrimination which in their world and their language means that you then have
[01:15:33.240 --> 01:15:42.840] the right to sue the sibling if you follow me.
[01:15:42.840 --> 01:15:43.840] Yes.
[01:15:43.840 --> 01:15:51.640] Okay, so what that means is the clock on your civil suit is not running yet.
[01:15:51.640 --> 01:15:52.640] That is correct.
[01:15:52.640 --> 01:15:59.240] The one other thing I want to mention is I did confirm that this thing was duly filed.
[01:15:59.240 --> 01:16:06.800] In other words, not just with the EEOC, it was also filed in the state of Indiana.
[01:16:06.800 --> 01:16:08.320] They did that.
[01:16:08.320 --> 01:16:09.320] Okay.
[01:16:09.320 --> 01:16:14.080] So, and you say they've delayed a long time?
[01:16:14.080 --> 01:16:19.520] Who, Brandon, which one?
[01:16:19.520 --> 01:16:29.000] Has the adjudication of the complaint moved along anywhere near rapidly or does it?
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:33.000] I thought you said that they drug their feature a long time when you started.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:44.200] Well, now, what happened was I originally, and I hear the cliff coming up, but I originally
[01:16:44.200 --> 01:16:50.000] started the process in February because of the deadline.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:51.000] Okay, okay, okay.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:52.000] Hold on.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:53.000] We're about to fall off the cliff.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:17:00.480] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruella Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.480 --> 01:17:05.760] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.760 --> 01:17:09.280] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[01:17:09.280 --> 01:17:13.600] Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[01:17:13.600 --> 01:17:14.600] can win two.
[01:17:14.600 --> 01:17:19.400] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.400 --> 01:17:21.080] civil rights statute.
[01:17:21.080 --> 01:17:24.720] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons?
[01:17:24.720 --> 01:17:26.720] How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.720 --> 01:17:28.960] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:28.960 --> 01:17:34.040] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:17:34.040 --> 01:17:39.160] The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:39.160 --> 01:17:41.280] Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.280 --> 01:17:46.840] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[01:17:46.840 --> 01:17:49.800] or email michaelmearris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.800 --> 01:17:57.520] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.520 --> 01:18:00.520] How to learn how to stop debt collectors now?
[01:18:00.520 --> 01:18:01.520] I love logos.
[01:18:01.520 --> 01:18:05.000] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:07.680] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.680 --> 01:18:08.880] I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.880 --> 01:18:13.560] I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.560 --> 01:18:17.320] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't
[01:18:17.320 --> 01:18:20.720] have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.720 --> 01:18:22.240] How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.240 --> 01:18:24.160] Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.160 --> 01:18:28.560] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies
[01:18:28.560 --> 01:18:29.560] or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.560 --> 01:18:31.720] First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.720 --> 01:18:38.120] Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.120 --> 01:18:43.760] Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.760 --> 01:18:44.760] Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.760 --> 01:18:45.760] No.
[01:18:45.760 --> 01:18:47.520] Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.520 --> 01:18:48.520] No.
[01:18:48.520 --> 01:18:49.520] Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:18:49.520 --> 01:18:50.520] No.
[01:18:50.520 --> 01:18:51.520] I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.520 --> 01:18:56.200] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:56.200 --> 01:18:57.200] Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.200 --> 01:18:58.200] We are Logos.
[01:18:58.200 --> 01:18:59.200] Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:59.200 --> 01:19:00.200] Logos.
[01:19:00.200 --> 01:19:01.200] Logos.
[01:19:01.200 --> 01:19:02.200] Logos.
[01:19:02.200 --> 01:19:03.200] Radio.
[01:19:03.200 --> 01:19:04.200] Net.
[01:19:04.200 --> 01:19:05.200] Radio.
[01:19:05.200 --> 01:19:06.200] Net.
[01:19:06.200 --> 01:19:07.200] Radio.
[01:19:07.200 --> 01:19:08.200] Radio.
[01:19:08.200 --> 01:19:09.200] Radio.
[01:19:09.200 --> 01:19:10.200] Radio.
[01:19:10.200 --> 01:19:11.200] Radio.
[01:19:11.200 --> 01:19:12.200] Radio.
[01:19:12.200 --> 01:19:13.200] Radio.
[01:19:13.200 --> 01:19:14.200] Radio.
[01:19:14.200 --> 01:19:15.200] Radio.
[01:19:15.200 --> 01:19:16.200] Radio.
[01:19:16.200 --> 01:19:17.200] Radio.
[01:19:17.200 --> 01:19:18.200] Radio.
[01:19:18.200 --> 01:19:19.200] Radio.
[01:19:19.200 --> 01:19:20.200] Radio.
[01:19:20.200 --> 01:19:21.200] Radio.
[01:19:21.200 --> 01:19:22.200] Radio.
[01:19:22.200 --> 01:19:23.200] Radio.
[01:19:23.200 --> 01:19:24.200] Radio.
[01:19:24.200 --> 01:19:25.200] Radio.
[01:19:25.200 --> 01:19:26.200] Radio.
[01:19:26.200 --> 01:19:27.200] Radio.
[01:19:27.200 --> 01:19:28.200] Radio.
[01:19:28.200 --> 01:19:29.200] Radio.
[01:19:29.200 --> 01:19:30.200] Radio.
[01:19:30.200 --> 01:19:31.200] Radio.
[01:19:31.200 --> 01:19:32.200] Radio.
[01:19:32.200 --> 01:19:33.200] Radio.
[01:19:33.200 --> 01:19:34.200] Radio.
[01:19:34.200 --> 01:19:35.200] Radio.
[01:19:35.200 --> 01:19:36.200] Radio.
[01:19:36.200 --> 01:19:37.200] Radio.
[01:19:37.200 --> 01:19:38.200] Radio.
[01:19:38.200 --> 01:19:39.200] Radio.
[01:19:39.200 --> 01:19:40.200] Radio.
[01:19:40.200 --> 01:19:41.200] Radio.
[01:19:41.200 --> 01:19:42.200] Radio.
[01:19:42.200 --> 01:19:43.200] Radio.
[01:19:43.200 --> 01:19:44.200] Radio.
[01:19:44.200 --> 01:19:45.200] Radio.
[01:19:45.200 --> 01:19:46.200] Radio.
[01:19:46.200 --> 01:19:47.200] Radio.
[01:19:47.200 --> 01:19:48.200] Radio.
[01:19:48.200 --> 01:19:49.200] Radio.
[01:19:49.200 --> 01:19:50.200] Radio.
[01:19:50.200 --> 01:19:57.520] So, now we kind of got where you're at, they're offering you nothing and you expect them to
[01:19:57.520 --> 01:20:00.520] rule against you.
[01:20:00.520 --> 01:20:01.520] Possibly.
[01:20:01.520 --> 01:20:07.680] Let me give you a little bit of backstory here, Randy, just for context, okay?
[01:20:07.680 --> 01:20:15.320] So I am a old construction worker, electrician specifically, but I've been in construction
[01:20:15.320 --> 01:20:20.160] management for a good while, you know, I've been doing this for almost 30 years.
[01:20:20.160 --> 01:20:28.200] So anyway, I became a traveling site superintendent for a company out of Wisconsin.
[01:20:28.200 --> 01:20:34.320] So specifically I started with them in 2012.
[01:20:34.320 --> 01:20:48.720] So long story short there, in 2019, I was doing some projects at a very well known international
[01:20:48.720 --> 01:20:53.240] company headquartered in Indiana, okay?
[01:20:53.240 --> 01:20:56.960] I worked for the big boys.
[01:20:56.960 --> 01:21:07.560] So this particular big boy started bringing in all of the so-called protections against
[01:21:07.560 --> 01:21:16.800] the virus back around February last year at their campus, right?
[01:21:16.800 --> 01:21:21.400] Over my construction site looks as would be expected.
[01:21:21.400 --> 01:21:28.240] So they keep progressing a little more, a little more, you know, the nose of the camera
[01:21:28.240 --> 01:21:37.520] in the tent, so on and so forth until they make masks mandatory.
[01:21:37.520 --> 01:21:44.040] Well, I immediately, and this is campus-wide job site, they don't care, this is what you
[01:21:44.040 --> 01:21:49.720] do as a condition to get into the building period.
[01:21:49.720 --> 01:21:58.880] So I immediately informed my superior of two things.
[01:21:58.880 --> 01:22:06.880] One, my particular medical condition, two, that it's an ocean violation.
[01:22:06.880 --> 01:22:14.240] There's many rounds of, I had two, let's say I had one conversation with him that was on
[01:22:14.240 --> 01:22:20.600] Friday, then the following Monday, and this was May the 11th of last year, 2020.
[01:22:20.600 --> 01:22:28.440] I had a couple more conversations with him, of course the HR and safety.
[01:22:28.440 --> 01:22:34.520] I have kept my consistency all the way through this, right?
[01:22:34.520 --> 01:22:42.000] Those are both personal and professional in that I had this history of medical illness.
[01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:47.360] I know what restricting my breathing is going to do to me.
[01:22:47.360 --> 01:22:53.080] And secondly, it's an ocean violation, this still is, I don't care what they say, and
[01:22:53.080 --> 01:22:54.720] I'm not going to delve into all that.
[01:22:54.720 --> 01:22:59.920] The EEOC doesn't care about the oceans though, okay?
[01:22:59.920 --> 01:23:08.320] So when this went down, I told them, well, I'm not doing it, and I won't enforce it
[01:23:08.320 --> 01:23:11.920] on my job site, and here's why.
[01:23:11.920 --> 01:23:17.680] I gave them chapter and verse out of ocean.
[01:23:17.680 --> 01:23:20.040] They said, okay, they couldn't budge me.
[01:23:20.040 --> 01:23:26.000] So they said, manager, remote, wait, well, the job wound up at the end of June, as it
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:27.000] was supposed to.
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:32.800] Everything was on schedule, despite all the stuff, everything, I kept her on schedule,
[01:23:32.800 --> 01:23:33.800] right?
[01:23:33.800 --> 01:23:42.360] So it goes on there, they say, okay, we've got other jobs, but you've got to wear a mask.
[01:23:42.360 --> 01:23:43.800] I go right through the same thing.
[01:23:43.800 --> 01:23:46.800] I do not consent to this, here's why.
[01:23:46.800 --> 01:23:56.960] So anyway, winds up there in the end of July, the 23rd, I'll get the phone call.
[01:23:56.960 --> 01:24:08.040] They furloughed me, by the way, that's laid off for exempt people, and at the end of June,
[01:24:08.040 --> 01:24:14.600] until basically the end of July, call me up, we're going to pay your insurance in a month,
[01:24:14.600 --> 01:24:17.520] and you're done.
[01:24:17.520 --> 01:24:27.560] So I wasn't as familiar with everything as I should have been, due to the new situation.
[01:24:27.560 --> 01:24:34.720] But anyway, I know what I'm doing in the construction world, so I wrote out a letter,
[01:24:34.720 --> 01:24:39.880] fired it off to them, and the response was, thanks for sending this over, but you got
[01:24:39.880 --> 01:24:43.880] to wear a mask.
[01:24:43.880 --> 01:24:52.200] That's not the exact line, it basically was all our customers required, so we got to this.
[01:24:52.200 --> 01:24:57.600] So I was fired August 31st.
[01:24:57.600 --> 01:25:04.440] So what the EEOC looks at is, did they go through the correct process, and this goes
[01:25:04.440 --> 01:25:09.240] to your point a while ago, what do I expect with regard to the ruling?
[01:25:09.240 --> 01:25:15.640] Well, my expectations are real, probably going to say they didn't do anything, or they didn't
[01:25:15.640 --> 01:25:17.640] do anything wrong.
[01:25:17.640 --> 01:25:27.280] However, well, off my train of thought here, I'm sorry, oh, I know what I was going to
[01:25:27.280 --> 01:25:34.720] say, EEOC is looking at, did they go through the proper process to give me accommodation
[01:25:34.720 --> 01:25:40.320] without dis-accommodating themselves, okay?
[01:25:40.320 --> 01:25:47.280] Obviously, based on what I originally told them, they're going to say, no, we'll go
[01:25:47.280 --> 01:25:52.600] through the process, we were supposed to go to mediation, EEOC actually dropped the ball
[01:25:52.600 --> 01:25:57.080] on that, it didn't happen.
[01:25:57.080 --> 01:26:02.600] And now we're at the investigation process.
[01:26:02.600 --> 01:26:16.280] Now my former employer did, of course, reply in early June to my original charge, of course,
[01:26:16.280 --> 01:26:23.320] they basically said, hey, he didn't do his job, he wouldn't go to the job site, right?
[01:26:23.320 --> 01:26:24.320] They said they...
[01:26:24.320 --> 01:26:25.320] Wouldn't go?
[01:26:25.320 --> 01:26:28.800] They said that you wouldn't go?
[01:26:28.800 --> 01:26:29.800] Correct.
[01:26:29.800 --> 01:26:30.800] They said...
[01:26:30.800 --> 01:26:31.800] Who?
[01:26:31.800 --> 01:26:36.640] They said that because I have to be on the job site as a site superintendent that my
[01:26:36.640 --> 01:26:47.520] presence, you know, me not being there violates that, even though they won't talk about my
[01:26:47.520 --> 01:26:49.520] contract.
[01:26:49.520 --> 01:26:59.080] Yeah, they just spun it with a lie in there that talks to your intent to show up at your
[01:26:59.080 --> 01:27:01.560] job site.
[01:27:01.560 --> 01:27:03.800] That wasn't what this was about.
[01:27:03.800 --> 01:27:05.600] Correct.
[01:27:05.600 --> 01:27:09.040] That is exactly right.
[01:27:09.040 --> 01:27:10.320] But that's just one angle.
[01:27:10.320 --> 01:27:23.280] What they've tried to do is because I framed it in both capacities as personal and professional.
[01:27:23.280 --> 01:27:28.400] In other words, I was doing my job, if you follow.
[01:27:28.400 --> 01:27:37.400] They hired me to do exactly what I did, if you follow me.
[01:27:37.400 --> 01:27:39.400] Yeah.
[01:27:39.400 --> 01:27:46.720] So they, you know, they tore out their own affidavits, basically went and cut and pasted
[01:27:46.720 --> 01:27:53.640] from the EEO feed website, and I'm trying to keep this a sink here, guys, and put that
[01:27:53.640 --> 01:27:59.920] in their affidavits and so forth, their lawyer's document is a mess.
[01:27:59.920 --> 01:28:02.040] But there's more to this, okay?
[01:28:02.040 --> 01:28:07.840] They never asked me for any documentation of anything with regard to my health situation,
[01:28:07.840 --> 01:28:12.840] which is why they don't have any exhibits, can't talk about exhibits.
[01:28:12.840 --> 01:28:21.480] In other words, their exhibits to their affidavits were my letter to them and my roles and responsibilities.
[01:28:21.480 --> 01:28:22.480] That's it.
[01:28:22.480 --> 01:28:29.480] No emails, no formal documentation, say, hey, we did this, this, and this, nothing,
[01:28:29.480 --> 01:28:35.320] because it doesn't exist.
[01:28:35.320 --> 01:28:36.320] So...
[01:28:36.320 --> 01:28:37.320] Okay.
[01:28:37.320 --> 01:28:39.840] Where are we going here?
[01:28:39.840 --> 01:28:40.840] Okay.
[01:28:40.840 --> 01:28:41.840] Well, that's...
[01:28:41.840 --> 01:28:48.760] And they're still pretty jumped in or reigned me back in here, so.
[01:28:48.760 --> 01:28:58.880] In the meantime, what I would like to do is go after that lawyer if I can.
[01:28:58.880 --> 01:28:59.880] Going after lawyers is easy.
[01:28:59.880 --> 01:29:03.600] I was going to say, Brett, you're up.
[01:29:03.600 --> 01:29:04.600] Right.
[01:29:04.600 --> 01:29:09.600] But let me throw you another couple little things in here, gentlemen, because it gets
[01:29:09.600 --> 01:29:11.720] more complicated yet.
[01:29:11.720 --> 01:29:12.720] So...
[01:29:12.720 --> 01:29:17.880] Let's not get it too awful complicated, we need to get to some point.
[01:29:17.880 --> 01:29:18.880] Okay.
[01:29:18.880 --> 01:29:25.880] And I'm working on it, Randy, and I apologize, I didn't try to keep this succinct and et cetera.
[01:29:25.880 --> 01:29:26.880] So...
[01:29:26.880 --> 01:29:32.880] In a parallel path with all this, I became familiar with Alphonse Faddy-Yellow's work,
[01:29:32.880 --> 01:29:41.880] and I heard a clip coming up, so I dropped the babies directly on them.
[01:29:41.880 --> 01:29:47.760] Okay, hang on, about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton.
[01:29:47.760 --> 01:29:53.680] Brett Fountain, Rue LaValle Radio, uh, callboard's full, so I'm not going to give out the call
[01:29:53.680 --> 01:29:54.680] in number.
[01:29:54.680 --> 01:29:58.760] Hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:29:58.760 --> 01:30:05.760] Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:30:05.760 --> 01:30:10.400] A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid
[01:30:10.400 --> 01:30:11.400] the stuff.
[01:30:11.400 --> 01:30:15.640] I'm Dr. Kauffman Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny
[01:30:15.640 --> 01:30:16.640] sodas.
[01:30:16.640 --> 01:30:19.080] Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:19.080 --> 01:30:22.680] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.680 --> 01:30:27.480] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:27.480 --> 01:30:32.560] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.560 --> 01:30:35.240] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.240 --> 01:30:39.560] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:30:39.560 --> 01:30:43.040] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:43.040 --> 01:30:45.040] Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.040 --> 01:30:50.520] Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right?
[01:30:50.520 --> 01:30:51.520] Wrong.
[01:30:51.520 --> 01:30:56.240] Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:56.240 --> 01:31:01.240] They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more
[01:31:01.240 --> 01:31:02.960] than no soda at all.
[01:31:02.960 --> 01:31:07.720] The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars,
[01:31:07.720 --> 01:31:10.120] don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:31:10.120 --> 01:31:14.440] Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger
[01:31:14.440 --> 01:31:16.040] overall calorie intake.
[01:31:16.040 --> 01:31:20.720] So, use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds,
[01:31:20.720 --> 01:31:23.960] avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:31:23.960 --> 01:31:30.760] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.760 --> 01:31:36.120] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.120 --> 01:31:38.240] The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.240 --> 01:31:43.200] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.200 --> 01:31:47.200] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:47.200 --> 01:31:48.640] first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.640 --> 01:31:52.480] I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a structural engineer, I'm a New York City correction officer,
[01:31:52.480 --> 01:31:57.200] I'm an Air Force pilot, I'm a father who lost his son, we're Americans, and we deserve
[01:31:57.200 --> 01:31:58.200] the truth.
[01:31:58.200 --> 01:32:02.200] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.200 --> 01:32:05.200] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.200 --> 01:32:08.920] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[01:32:08.920 --> 01:32:12.680] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:12.680 --> 01:32:16.080] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:16.080 --> 01:32:20.080] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.080 --> 01:32:23.960] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:23.960 --> 01:32:25.680] our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.680 --> 01:32:29.320] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:29.320 --> 01:32:33.080] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:33.080 --> 01:32:35.480] is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.480 --> 01:32:39.480] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:39.480 --> 01:32:42.840] ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The
[01:32:42.840 --> 01:32:47.280] Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009
[01:32:47.280 --> 01:32:51.000] seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:54.880] to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order
[01:32:54.880 --> 01:32:59.880] your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:59.880 --> 01:33:09.880] Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.880 --> 01:33:48.880] The way you come with temptations, they're trying to buy the whole place. They want to
[01:33:48.880 --> 01:34:15.880] buy the whole place. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:15.880 --> 01:34:20.400] We're going to talk to Mark in Indiana and Mark, your succinct is not quite as succinct
[01:34:20.400 --> 01:34:29.400] as I'd like to see. Can you bring us to a point? Yes, sir. So, I had a parallel path
[01:34:29.400 --> 01:34:33.960] there. I dropped that thing directly on them. The lawyer did not understand it and replied
[01:34:33.960 --> 01:34:39.600] back to the EEOC. I just got all these documents first part of this week and reviewed them
[01:34:39.600 --> 01:34:49.040] so, first thing is, I'd like to be able to bargery her twice once for her original and
[01:34:49.040 --> 01:34:54.960] once for her mistake and I know you can bargery for basically anything and I've been digging
[01:34:54.960 --> 01:35:04.000] through there. Is that a good idea? Should I just do it once? Wait, who had that idea?
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:13.440] What do you mean, is it a good idea? All right, done. The second thing is... No, wait,
[01:35:13.440 --> 01:35:19.000] wait, wait, wait. I didn't understand what you were asking. Were you asking, was it
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:27.880] a good idea to just do it once? Well, I mean, the first document, of course, would
[01:35:27.880 --> 01:35:36.360] be the employer's response through their lawyer to the EEOC. The other one is because
[01:35:36.360 --> 01:35:42.040] he doesn't understand what I did with the affidavits. Each one should be separate. Yeah,
[01:35:42.040 --> 01:35:49.920] send it separately. Sure. Yeah, just one thing. Make sure you mention which rule, which Indiana
[01:35:49.920 --> 01:35:58.920] Bar rule was violated for each one. Shouldn't I have to use Wisconsin? She's in Wisconsin.
[01:35:58.920 --> 01:36:07.480] Oh, she's in Wisconsin. Yes. So, you used the Wisconsin. Wait a minute. Was the issue
[01:36:07.480 --> 01:36:15.280] that occurred, did it occur in Wisconsin or Indiana? It occurred in Indiana. Oh, well,
[01:36:15.280 --> 01:36:22.720] when you usually have an Indiana Bar license, then you could charge her with an unauthorized
[01:36:22.720 --> 01:36:30.640] practice of law in Indiana. Okay, well, and let me just clarify here that the company
[01:36:30.640 --> 01:36:38.720] that I work for is based in Wisconsin. Where did you... Where was the action filed in Wisconsin
[01:36:38.720 --> 01:36:50.480] or in Indiana? Indiana. Indiana has jurisdiction. She's practicing in Indiana or EEOC's federal.
[01:36:50.480 --> 01:36:57.640] Is this in the federal court? Oh, it's not in the federal court. It's a federal agency.
[01:36:57.640 --> 01:37:04.120] Yeah. That's an interesting question, Brett. It has been filed in Indiana, though. That's
[01:37:04.120 --> 01:37:09.480] what I mentioned a while ago. It has been filed in Indiana. Can you hammer her for not...
[01:37:09.480 --> 01:37:15.560] You know, she has a bar card for Indiana. If she's authorized to practice in Indiana,
[01:37:15.560 --> 01:37:21.880] let her prove it up. But grieve her anyway. I didn't think about that. That's actually
[01:37:21.880 --> 01:37:26.800] better than what I was digging on anyway. The second thing is this, unless you guys
[01:37:26.800 --> 01:37:31.240] have more thoughts there. Well, yeah. If you want to tell me her name, I'll tell you whether
[01:37:31.240 --> 01:37:36.960] she's a member and either one. Oh, I know she is. I've already looked her up in Wisconsin,
[01:37:36.960 --> 01:37:49.760] but her name is Katherine. That's K-A-T-H-R-Y-N-L-N-Q-A-T-N-S-H-U-E. I don't even think of looking
[01:37:49.760 --> 01:38:02.080] her up in Indiana. Nope. No records match. So you can hit her up for unauthorized practice
[01:38:02.080 --> 01:38:13.400] of law in Indiana. That's probably a criminal act. Mm-hmm. I'll look about criminal stuff
[01:38:13.400 --> 01:38:22.960] after that then. Now, back to what you mentioned earlier there, Randy, with the civil suit.
[01:38:22.960 --> 01:38:30.960] I can prove that I have the medical history that I claim, okay? My question is, is it
[01:38:30.960 --> 01:38:38.840] more prudent to include that because I got to... I don't have to, but I'm going to respond
[01:38:38.840 --> 01:38:48.320] in the best way I can to try to get the ruling from the EEOC that I want, obviously. By the
[01:38:48.320 --> 01:38:56.720] 17th, so I've got two weeks, is it prudent to go ahead and include that in my response
[01:38:56.720 --> 01:39:04.240] to the EEOC as kind of a gotcha to them or should I wait until the civil suit and drop
[01:39:04.240 --> 01:39:12.480] it then? Now, go ahead and put it in the EEOC complaint. Okay. If you're trying to get...
[01:39:12.480 --> 01:39:17.400] If these are the facts, the facts are not going to change. When you get to the civil
[01:39:17.400 --> 01:39:29.240] suit, go to the mask law society site, the channel on Telegram. I just dropped in a document
[01:39:29.240 --> 01:39:38.040] that goes through all kind of stuff. On that site, in the documents section, you will find
[01:39:38.040 --> 01:39:52.440] a ruling out of Tennessee. It'll be close to the top. This is a case where some parents
[01:39:52.440 --> 01:40:01.520] in a school system, the governor forbade school systems to issue mask mandates. The school
[01:40:01.520 --> 01:40:09.960] did not issue a mandate. A number of parents with children who had compromised immune systems
[01:40:09.960 --> 01:40:22.120] sued the school board for not providing them with a safe learning environment. Essentially,
[01:40:22.120 --> 01:40:31.200] they wrote your suit for you. Okay. You say this is out of Tennessee. Yeah, out of Tennessee.
[01:40:31.200 --> 01:40:45.000] What it argues is that if this is a university, then all of the federal laws apply. They have
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:53.320] to provide for you a safe working environment. You might want to look at this argument as
[01:40:53.320 --> 01:41:01.880] a response to the EEOC. Okay. Because you have this condition that brings you under the
[01:41:01.880 --> 01:41:07.080] Americans Disabilities Act, and you have a right to reasonable accommodation. What this
[01:41:07.080 --> 01:41:15.720] is arguing is that these people with special issues have a right to be protected. They're
[01:41:15.720 --> 01:41:28.280] claiming that the lack of masks are denying their children this protection because they
[01:41:28.280 --> 01:41:35.280] are compromised. Now, you're going to argue the opposite side is that the use of the mask
[01:41:35.280 --> 01:41:43.800] will harm you, and they have a duty to provide accommodation for you because of your special
[01:41:43.800 --> 01:41:50.920] issue. So look at both of those documents. The document all the way at the bottom, the
[01:41:50.920 --> 01:41:59.960] one I just posted, it has all these studies about the problems the masks cause. Do you
[01:41:59.960 --> 01:42:10.400] have COPD? No, I do not. Okay. Well, it addressed COPD specifically, but it also addressed a
[01:42:10.400 --> 01:42:20.800] lot of other similar issues. You'll probably find yours in there. Okay. So similar one
[01:42:20.800 --> 01:42:25.440] out of Kentucky, Boone County, again, ain't pity. I don't know if he's involved here,
[01:42:25.440 --> 01:42:35.000] but yeah, I've got that one. That one is not as specific as this one was to your issue.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:44.960] That one was an ask in general. Correct. This was specifically someone with a disability,
[01:42:44.960 --> 01:42:51.840] and their right to accommodation relevant to their disability. And that's exactly the
[01:42:51.840 --> 01:42:59.840] argument you're making. So include that and then provide documentation saying, hey, I've
[01:42:59.840 --> 01:43:07.480] got exactly what I said right from the beginning and say, here's this. And here are the studies
[01:43:07.480 --> 01:43:17.120] that show that the masks will exacerbate this condition. Okay. It seems so silly that you
[01:43:17.120 --> 01:43:20.520] even have to bring up all that stuff. They're not doctors. They don't have any medical
[01:43:20.520 --> 01:43:26.160] position to be trying to make these kinds of decisions, whether or not to authorize an
[01:43:26.160 --> 01:43:31.640] exemption or deny it based on medical reasons. They don't know any medical stuff. It seems
[01:43:31.640 --> 01:43:38.360] so silly. Wow. Brett, they never asked me the entire time. And I hear it, but they never
[01:43:38.360 --> 01:43:44.840] asked me the entire time. They asked me how it felt when I was having an asthma attack.
[01:43:44.840 --> 01:43:50.800] That's all there is. Okay, hang on. About to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett
[01:43:50.800 --> 01:44:00.760] Fountain, Rue's Law Radio. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.760 --> 01:44:05.400] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:44:05.400 --> 01:44:10.080] of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we
[01:44:10.080 --> 01:44:16.200] changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[01:44:16.200 --> 01:44:21.880] is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and
[01:44:21.880 --> 01:44:28.040] mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests
[01:44:28.040 --> 01:44:33.360] to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity
[01:44:33.360 --> 01:44:39.280] so much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many
[01:44:39.280 --> 01:44:46.160] others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:46.160 --> 01:44:52.200] quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us. As a
[01:44:52.200 --> 01:44:57.760] distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase
[01:44:57.760 --> 01:45:05.280] your income. Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without
[01:45:05.280 --> 01:45:11.640] an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show
[01:45:11.640 --> 01:45:18.360] you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should
[01:45:18.360 --> 01:45:23.680] be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands
[01:45:23.680 --> 01:45:29.640] have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[01:45:29.640 --> 01:45:36.680] by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:36.680 --> 01:45:41.720] you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[01:45:41.720 --> 01:45:48.320] our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[01:45:48.320 --> 01:45:55.600] for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit LulevLawRadio.com and click
[01:45:55.600 --> 01:46:02.600] on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:25.600 --> 01:46:54.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Salton, Rude Law Radio, and we're talking to Mark
[01:46:54.280 --> 01:47:06.840] and Indiana. Okay, Mark, you got a lot of reading. Yes, sir. Oh, that case you mentioned
[01:47:06.840 --> 01:47:16.600] out of Kentucky. Yes. Did you notice the part in there where they referenced the Magna Carta?
[01:47:16.600 --> 01:47:23.200] I did, and that came from you, I believe. That was so cool to read. I've never seen
[01:47:23.200 --> 01:47:30.440] the Magna Carta referenced anywhere before, and the Kentucky Supreme referenced it in
[01:47:30.440 --> 01:47:40.360] their order. Yes, I did. Do you want to hear something also cool from my perspective, Mr.
[01:47:40.360 --> 01:47:54.480] Ken? Yes. The expert, Petty, his presentation is based on exactly what I quoted chapter
[01:47:54.480 --> 01:48:01.960] and verse on the OSHA side, which obviously doesn't apply to the EEOC stuff. I get it.
[01:48:01.960 --> 01:48:09.760] It's the same thing I quoted to them chapter and verse in my letter back in July last year
[01:48:09.760 --> 01:48:19.040] for Maydom. It looks like he did his homework. Yes, sir. It looks like he liked what he
[01:48:19.040 --> 01:48:27.440] saw. Yes, sir. Yeah, I just, that document I mentioned that I just posted today, I told
[01:48:27.440 --> 01:48:35.840] Brett that two-thirds of it is out of one study that I captured. The whole study dropped
[01:48:35.840 --> 01:48:44.920] it into the lawsuit, into the letter, and set headings on every paragraph. Do I plagiarize
[01:48:44.920 --> 01:48:57.320] good or what? And then to have somebody plagiarize my plagiarizing? Well, when I get my stuff
[01:48:57.320 --> 01:49:06.200] squared away here, I actually got your stuff there against your governor. My governor just
[01:49:06.200 --> 01:49:13.640] reinstated the state of emergency here for the 19th time. It looks like he needs somebody
[01:49:13.640 --> 01:49:22.680] to go after him. Well, good. Do him good. We had a guy in New Jersey take my complaint
[01:49:22.680 --> 01:49:27.480] and rewrite it for me. Jersey filed it and the governor rescinded all of his executive
[01:49:27.480 --> 01:49:37.760] orders. They're not used to somebody coming after him criminally. Yep. And it looks like
[01:49:37.760 --> 01:49:44.520] that's what it's going to take. But yeah, I will definitely get into the stuff you recommended
[01:49:44.520 --> 01:49:52.120] there. And just one last thing. So you would take, you would recommend that I take what's
[01:49:52.120 --> 01:50:02.120] in there and the studies, et cetera, et cetera, and my reply back to the EEOC, because I'm
[01:50:02.120 --> 01:50:09.720] not going to get into all their stuff. If you feel like you're more welcome, you have
[01:50:09.720 --> 01:50:17.840] the documents I emailed to be, their lawyer is, she's a mess, all right? So I'm not going
[01:50:17.840 --> 01:50:22.560] to deal with all that. I just want to have a legitimate reply. You know what I'm saying?
[01:50:22.560 --> 01:50:28.360] Yeah. I'm not going to try to take their stuff or they've already done that. Yeah, I want
[01:50:28.360 --> 01:50:32.800] to give them a lot of, I always want to give them a lot of stuff to read and respond to.
[01:50:32.800 --> 01:50:41.280] Wrax up the hours. Well, and what I'll do is I'll go ahead and do it that way and go
[01:50:41.280 --> 01:50:46.960] ahead and look about reminding this particular attorney that she does not practice in my
[01:50:46.960 --> 01:50:55.120] state. Don't remind her, just with your warning though, remind her via bar grievance and remind
[01:50:55.120 --> 01:51:03.280] her via criminal complaint. Yeah, they've got a, I was going to ask you about that and
[01:51:03.280 --> 01:51:10.480] Brett, man, you got the way I think and what I do and I'm trying to learn this stuff, but
[01:51:10.480 --> 01:51:17.480] exactly. I was trying to get it to that level, but yeah, that shows me, or they'll really
[01:51:17.480 --> 01:51:23.480] show her, hey, you're messing with this Hoosier down here, right?
[01:51:23.480 --> 01:51:31.240] Well, okay. Well, good luck with it and keep us up to date on how to cause. Alright, next
[01:51:31.240 --> 01:51:38.760] time I will be substantially more succinct, Randy. Okay, thank you. Thank you. Thank you,
[01:51:38.760 --> 01:51:45.760] thank you. Okay, now we're going to Chris in Colorado. Hello, Chris. What do you have
[01:51:45.760 --> 01:51:57.200] for us today? Hey guys, good to talk to you. Well, I have a question about personal injury
[01:51:57.200 --> 01:52:03.400] cases or dealing with insurance companies. I have stumbled on kind of a mess and I'm
[01:52:03.400 --> 01:52:09.280] learning as much as I can as fast as I can. And this is one of the things you guys always
[01:52:09.280 --> 01:52:12.840] talk to how the systems are kind of rigged sometimes and this is one of those ones that
[01:52:12.840 --> 01:52:21.200] I didn't even know existed, but it's big and any experience navigating this with Mays?
[01:52:21.200 --> 01:52:30.640] That's not an area that I have ever gotten into, but of all the areas of legal specialization,
[01:52:30.640 --> 01:52:39.800] it's probably the one that is the least generally corrupt. The reason being is you've got a lot
[01:52:39.800 --> 01:52:48.880] of lawyers out there who do this kind of litigation and make good money at it. So they fight it
[01:52:48.880 --> 01:52:53.600] pretty hard because mostly in this kind of litigation, you deal with an insurance company
[01:52:53.600 --> 01:53:03.360] and the lawyers come in on contingency. So they fight these things a lot harder.
[01:53:03.360 --> 01:53:09.640] But they force it into the contingency because the insurance companies play one end and they
[01:53:09.640 --> 01:53:12.840] say, okay, you're ignorant. Let's see how ignorant you really are. And then when they
[01:53:12.840 --> 01:53:20.280] get a lawyer in, then the lawyer is set up two ways to take the majority if not usually
[01:53:20.280 --> 01:53:24.440] it's about half to the majority of the settlement because you're not actually going to court.
[01:53:24.440 --> 01:53:29.640] You're only going to do settlement. 95% of these never make it to court. And so the
[01:53:29.640 --> 01:53:35.080] lawyer takes a third or more and then all the expenses come out of the settlement as
[01:53:35.080 --> 01:53:43.280] well, which can leave the person who brought the issue with 40, 30, 25% or less. So it
[01:53:43.280 --> 01:53:46.920] doesn't seem like it's stacked in anybody's favor to actually get a lawyer and that's
[01:53:46.920 --> 01:53:51.360] what I'm finding. I've talked to a couple lawyers.
[01:53:51.360 --> 01:54:00.120] And I kind of tend to agree. If you have some capability, it's all about the money. And
[01:54:00.120 --> 01:54:04.040] if you know how to cost them a lot of money, ask them a lot of hard legal questions that
[01:54:04.040 --> 01:54:07.480] they don't want to answer, they'll come to the table and make a deal.
[01:54:07.480 --> 01:54:14.120] Well, that's what I started to do. I've already stirred up some stuff within the insurance
[01:54:14.120 --> 01:54:17.840] department by filing complaints because I wasn't getting any responses from either insurance
[01:54:17.840 --> 01:54:22.040] companies. Like an offender vendor, I've had a couple offender vendors. They call me the
[01:54:22.040 --> 01:54:28.040] next day. I got to check within two or three days. My car is in the shop by the next week.
[01:54:28.040 --> 01:54:30.960] You know, it's just real straightforward. Always left me feeling good about insurance
[01:54:30.960 --> 01:54:38.120] company this time because it's bodily injury. They do not call. They make you call them.
[01:54:38.120 --> 01:54:41.160] And then they get you recording and then they set you up and it's just this kind of thing
[01:54:41.160 --> 01:54:44.720] where in the end they're going to use all this against it. So I just said, you know,
[01:54:44.720 --> 01:54:49.560] I don't think this is a good faith effort. So I filed a complaint against the insurance
[01:54:49.560 --> 01:54:52.320] companies through the Department of Insurance and all of a sudden they get a phone call
[01:54:52.320 --> 01:54:53.880] and everybody's being all nice.
[01:54:53.880 --> 01:54:56.400] Funny how that works.
[01:54:56.400 --> 01:55:05.240] Yeah. So I'm going to continue to file complaints and every move they make and see how it goes.
[01:55:05.240 --> 01:55:12.440] But I'm trying to do kind of a different approach this time. I understand I need to keep the
[01:55:12.440 --> 01:55:17.120] doctor's bills and I need to keep all that going. It's just a little overwhelming because
[01:55:17.120 --> 01:55:23.560] not every day I'm up and sharp like I am today. So it's not like a normal thing where we're
[01:55:23.560 --> 01:55:29.360] just having fun beating up lawyers and insurance companies. This is actually a challenge, big
[01:55:29.360 --> 01:55:30.520] challenge.
[01:55:30.520 --> 01:55:35.720] And just because a lawyer knows more about it, why should I give him half of the settlement,
[01:55:35.720 --> 01:55:40.840] you know, when I may be able to get the same thing out of them myself or more. So I'm trying
[01:55:40.840 --> 01:55:44.440] to put a lot of pressure and I guess that's what I was asking. You guys got any ideas
[01:55:44.440 --> 01:55:49.720] to start stacking some pressures on these guys because it's a claim. I have to present
[01:55:49.720 --> 01:55:54.440] a claim. I know a lot of the ins and outs now, but I don't know if there's any tactics
[01:55:54.440 --> 01:55:57.640] that anybody's ever played out there other than to do something like that.
[01:55:57.640 --> 01:56:02.440] Look up some lawsuits similar to yours. If this is a traffic issue, there's probably
[01:56:02.440 --> 01:56:10.920] hundreds of them. And once you read two or three, you'll find the same things in occurring
[01:56:10.920 --> 01:56:17.160] in all of them. And that'll give you a format for how to build your suit.
[01:56:17.160 --> 01:56:23.960] What I've read so far is the insurance coverage and how insurance companies. I read a bunch
[01:56:23.960 --> 01:56:28.120] of case law for Wyoming because Wyoming is kind of small. There's not a lot. There's like 10
[01:56:28.120 --> 01:56:32.600] case law suits all the way to the Supreme Court. I've read about half of them so far.
[01:56:32.600 --> 01:56:37.400] And it's been a dispute as to how you stack coverage and you get coverage out of multiple
[01:56:37.400 --> 01:56:43.720] policies and all that kind of stuff. But as far as the argument says as to what your case is really
[01:56:43.720 --> 01:56:49.800] worth, that's just who knows how it's been at the best. And that's what I think lawyers do
[01:56:49.800 --> 01:56:54.360] is they put enough pressure. And that's what I think I was asking is how do I just put pressure
[01:56:54.360 --> 01:57:01.800] on these people? I just keep figuring out like I am. Go into other cases and pull motions and
[01:57:01.800 --> 01:57:12.760] pleadings. Just hammer them with them. It's about costing them money. 90 something percent,
[01:57:12.760 --> 01:57:21.400] never make it to trial. Yes. Go in from that perspective. So that means you're not so concerned
[01:57:21.400 --> 01:57:29.000] about the legal particulars. You don't expect to get it to a judicial ruling anyway.
[01:57:30.200 --> 01:57:36.200] So why don't I beat them up? Cost them as much money as possible. Bargain their lawyers into
[01:57:36.200 --> 01:57:47.640] the Stone Age so that they go through 10 law firms. Yeah, agreed. Okay. I got plenty of time.
[01:57:47.640 --> 01:57:56.040] So I'll just keep inching along. Real quick question before you guys let me go. So I am in
[01:57:56.040 --> 01:58:00.920] federal court in Illinois in Chicago and I have a hearing coming up in about a month.
[01:58:00.920 --> 01:58:07.480] So the lawyers are going to start answering my complaint here in the next month. Any reason
[01:58:07.480 --> 01:58:15.320] I have to talk to any of those guys? To talk to their lawyers? Why should you? Well,
[01:58:16.360 --> 01:58:22.120] well, I'm a pro stay and the insurance company is going to have a law firm. The phone company is
[01:58:22.120 --> 01:58:28.520] going to have a lawyer. They already have two now. Yeah, they can give legal advice to the ones
[01:58:28.520 --> 01:58:34.280] that hired them. There's no requirement on you to have to listen to a word that those lawyers say.
[01:58:35.240 --> 01:58:39.800] I mean, okay, so he has a nice tie, whatever. That doesn't mean that you have to listen to him.
[01:58:40.440 --> 01:58:48.520] Who hired him? Yeah, we can talk about that some more after we come back from our sponsors.
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:55.880] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. Yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.880 --> 01:59:01.880] because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:01.880 --> 01:59:06.040] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:13.480] Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.480 --> 01:59:19.560] but the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound
[01:59:19.560 --> 01:59:25.080] passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word
[01:59:25.080 --> 01:59:30.440] beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a
[01:59:30.440 --> 01:59:36.200] free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible
[01:59:36.200 --> 01:59:47.800] is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.800 --> 02:00:00.120] That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.