ROL_2021-08-06_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.760]  The following news flashes brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.760 --> 00:15.400]  Markets for Monday 22 July 2019 Open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429.00, Silver $16.45.00,
[00:15.400 --> 00:24.520]  Copper $2.75.00, Oil, Texas Crew $55.63.00, Brent Crew $62.47.00, and Crypto is in order
[00:24.520 --> 00:37.160]  of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31,
[00:37.160 --> 00:42.440]  and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 of Crypto Coin.
[00:42.440 --> 00:52.400]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:57.720]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing
[00:57.720 --> 01:04.720]  10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:04.720 --> 01:09.400]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing hemp into
[01:09.400 --> 01:14.040]  taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin
[01:14.040 --> 01:18.040]  and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:18.040 --> 01:22.280]  new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:22.280 --> 01:24.720]  equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:24.720 --> 01:28.440]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:28.440 --> 01:33.000]  she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.000 --> 01:34.000]  law.
[01:34.000 --> 01:37.600]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.600 --> 01:42.120]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.120 --> 01:48.280]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.280 --> 01:54.480]  well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.480 --> 01:58.960]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:58.960 --> 02:01.680]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.680 --> 02:06.720]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.720 --> 02:10.760]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.760 --> 02:13.480]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.480 --> 02:17.360]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.360 --> 02:22.600]  charged with.
[02:22.600 --> 02:27.400]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark.
[02:27.400 --> 02:32.320]  As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.320 --> 02:38.000]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.000 --> 02:39.000]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.000 --> 02:43.760]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:43.760 --> 02:50.040]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.040 --> 03:18.200]  glow.
[03:18.200 --> 03:23.200]  Tell me, what you gonna do, what you gonna do?
[03:25.200 --> 03:32.200]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you?
[03:32.200 --> 03:38.200]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you?
[03:38.200 --> 03:43.200]  When you were eight and your hat bad tree, you go to school and learn the golden rules
[03:43.200 --> 03:49.200]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool if you get f***ed and you make the crew?
[03:49.200 --> 03:54.200]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you?
[03:54.200 --> 04:00.200]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you?
[04:03.200 --> 04:08.200]  Okay, Howdy Howdy, Randy Felton, Brett Fountain, Rue de Blas Radio
[04:08.200 --> 04:16.200]  on this Friday, the sixth day of August 2021
[04:16.200 --> 04:23.200]  Brett is not here at the moment, I haven't talked to him so I don't know if he's gonna show up or not
[04:23.200 --> 04:31.200]  I am turning the phone lines on, I call in number 512-646-1984
[04:31.200 --> 04:35.200]  If you have a question or comment, give us a call
[04:35.200 --> 04:43.200]  A lot of things are happening, moving towards some political angles
[04:43.200 --> 04:51.200]  After 30 years of research and 15 years on the show
[04:51.200 --> 04:59.200]  I think I am at a point to where I can start closing in on a finishing point
[04:59.200 --> 05:07.200]  on getting something, a project I've been working on this whole time completed
[05:07.200 --> 05:16.200]  I tried to contact the governor and give him a plum, but I think he's a little PO'd at me, he's not responding
[05:16.200 --> 05:22.200]  Only one little criminal complaint against him, he shouldn't take that personal
[05:22.200 --> 05:29.200]  responsibility out of that spot, he had all these executive orders that was running his chance of getting re-elected
[05:29.200 --> 05:33.200]  and somebody needed to give him an excuse to get rid of him
[05:33.200 --> 05:37.200]  So he ought to be thanking me for trying to get him arrested
[05:37.200 --> 05:43.200]  He probably holds a grudge over that, some guy just got no sense of humor
[05:43.200 --> 05:56.200]  But I've been researching how to get the system set up so that they would have to begin to follow law
[05:56.200 --> 06:02.200]  This problem of the contention between the public and the police
[06:02.200 --> 06:06.200]  This perception that the police are out of control
[06:06.200 --> 06:11.200]  And I say perception because I don't know if they're really out of control or not
[06:11.200 --> 06:16.200]  They seem to be, but then again, all we see are the bad things
[06:16.200 --> 06:22.200]  When people take videos of police doing their job the way they're supposed to
[06:22.200 --> 06:30.200]  That's not a big deal, nobody posts those, they only post when policemen act inappropriately
[06:30.200 --> 06:37.200]  And every time a policeman acts inappropriately, it seems like half a dozen people are videotaping it
[06:37.200 --> 06:44.200]  and splattered all over the internet, so I'm trying to be careful
[06:44.200 --> 06:49.200]  You know, I have a special aversion to police with attitude
[06:49.200 --> 06:59.200]  I have been on the sharp end of that a few times, but I don't want that to cloud my judgement
[06:59.200 --> 07:07.200]  Are the police really as bad as we think they are or that we currently perceive them to be
[07:07.200 --> 07:14.200]  Or are there a few bad policemen out there and the good policemen have no way of getting rid of them
[07:14.200 --> 07:26.200]  I've had Sheriff's deputies come to me more than once, ask me if there was something that I could do to help them get rid of an officer that's making them all look bad
[07:26.200 --> 07:32.200]  Those were rather sobering experiences
[07:32.200 --> 07:39.200]  To have the police actually asked me to help get rid of somebody because they couldn't, they were stuck with it
[07:39.200 --> 07:43.200]  So now it seems to be coming to a head, but I think we've got a remedy
[07:43.200 --> 07:49.200]  And working on that remedy, and we're working on that remedy somewhat with Miss Mary
[07:49.200 --> 07:51.200]  Hello Miss Mary
[07:51.200 --> 07:53.200]  Good evening
[07:53.200 --> 08:01.200]  Good evening, tell us about our illustrious prosecutor attorney who doesn't want to do his job
[08:01.200 --> 08:12.200]  Well, I did a lot of research today and he's trying to defend his position now by saying it's the police who are being negligent
[08:12.200 --> 08:23.200]  Even though the new police interim chief was at the Capitol promoting the defending of the police
[08:23.200 --> 08:27.200]  So they're lying blatantly
[08:27.200 --> 08:46.200]  And I'm looking at doing a court warrant, or getting somebody to do that and have contacted a higher member of the Austin Police Association today
[08:46.200 --> 08:54.200]  Will you explain to everybody what court warrant or amounts to?
[08:54.200 --> 09:03.200]  Well, I'm looking here at a case filed with our now attorney general Paxton and a few others
[09:03.200 --> 09:11.200]  First assistant attorney general deputy first assistant attorney general deputy attorney general for civil litigation
[09:11.200 --> 09:15.200]  Special counsel assistant attorney general
[09:15.200 --> 09:30.200]  It's written a few years ago in 2018 and it says it's a two or three page suit with the state of Texas versus several defendants from the city of Austin
[09:30.200 --> 09:37.200]  Saying they unlawfully hold positions on the commission
[09:37.200 --> 09:46.200]  And it says a court warrant is a lawsuit through which the state acts to protect itself and the good of the public generally
[09:46.200 --> 09:57.200]  Fuller Springs versus State, X-Rail, City of Austin, 1974 and a few other sites
[09:57.200 --> 10:07.200]  A court warrant is available when a person unlawfully holds an office created by the authority of the state of Texas
[10:07.200 --> 10:15.200]  If there is a probable ground for the proceeding, the judge shall grant leave to file the information, order the information to be filed in order process to be issued
[10:15.200 --> 10:24.200]  And the information is filed to issue a citation as in civil cases commanding the defendant to answer and appear
[10:24.200 --> 10:28.200]  The case then proceeds the same as the civil case
[10:28.200 --> 10:33.200]  Here they're talking about upon finding that a person unlawfully holds an office
[10:33.200 --> 10:42.200]  Probable grounds are determined from the petition, the petition including the attached information states the cause of action
[10:42.200 --> 10:45.200]  It's rather short
[10:45.200 --> 10:55.200]  I just, I want to make sure I can give some heavy hitters some good law where they can move forward easily
[10:55.200 --> 11:07.200]  So how do you think I'd present it to the police association?
[11:07.200 --> 11:12.200]  Randy, are you there?
[11:12.200 --> 11:16.200]  What do you think, Grant, about the court warrant of?
[11:16.200 --> 11:22.200]  I love it, I've never done one, but I think it sounds perfectly fitting
[11:22.200 --> 11:27.200]  How do you, wow, wow
[11:27.200 --> 11:29.200]  We can hear it, Randy
[11:29.200 --> 11:31.200]  I'm sorry, I thought I had that muted
[11:31.200 --> 11:35.200]  That was the wrong end of the mute
[11:35.200 --> 11:44.200]  Yeah, I was going to give me for that, I'm having some trouble with this, I'm glad you showed up
[11:44.200 --> 11:55.200]  So we just, Mary was asking how should she present that to the police association?
[11:55.200 --> 11:57.200]  Is that a question for me?
[11:57.200 --> 12:01.200]  Well it sounded like it, is that what I understood, Mary?
[12:01.200 --> 12:02.200]  Correct
[12:02.200 --> 12:20.200]  Present it as the prosecuting attorney has, what's the term, when you start with an R, it didn't revoke your contract, you repudiated his contract
[12:20.200 --> 12:41.200]  In that he failed to perform duties he's required to perform, and as I read the code, when a prosecuting attorney fails to prosecute, then he denies the public and the equal protection of the laws
[12:41.200 --> 12:51.200]  And when he commits crimes in office, that renders him subject to court until removal
[12:51.200 --> 13:09.200]  Well the code, as I understand it, was stating that somebody might not be able to prosecute a position because there's a conflict of interest with another job or another duty, and it doesn't go into conduct, it goes into their ability to sit in some official position
[13:09.200 --> 13:24.200]  The attorney general always wants to act like his only prosecutorial authority is when the prosecuting attorney asks him to intervene
[13:24.200 --> 13:39.200]  But that was changed a few years ago when they rewrote 39.03 to give the attorney general concurrent authority for the prosecution of a public official
[13:39.200 --> 13:49.200]  When it's a matter of crime against a public official, the attorney general has a regional jurisdiction
[13:49.200 --> 14:05.200]  You know what? This is reflecting on the issues that Marcia brought up between our old DA, Mary something, who got busted on a DWI and really paraded around publicly
[14:05.200 --> 14:23.200]  Two weeks after she had signed a letter which I had read that said she was going to investigate into these white collar crimes that Mike had alleged, and two weeks later she was basically disposed of, or at least publicly humiliated, touched her position
[14:23.200 --> 14:40.200]  And then they dissolved her white crimes unit. I think Terry did that, dissolved the white crimes unit. So this might be a new application of authority over white collar crime unit that the Texas Rangers had gotten as an interim
[14:40.200 --> 14:57.200]  And that was Ron Earl who got that originally put in place, but he abused it so horribly that the legislature took it away from them, and I always said it was illegal anyway
[14:57.200 --> 15:16.200]  Because of article 2.03. 2.03 tells the prosecuting attorney that when he's made known in any manner that a public official has violated a law relating to his office, he shall reduce the complaint to an information smith grand jury, no discretion there
[15:16.200 --> 15:40.200]  So for the district attorney to have a public integrity unit, what the heck is that crap? If he has reason to believe a public official has violated a law relating to his office, he doesn't have any jurisdiction concerning investigating the crime, that's a police department's job
[15:40.200 --> 15:48.200]  And he has no power to determine whether that goes to a grand jury or not. Legislature took that away from him
[15:48.200 --> 15:58.200]  And finally, the legislature figured out why that article 2.03 was put there
[15:58.200 --> 16:13.200]  Because if the prosecuting attorney is given any discretion at all, he will abuse it horribly, which they did, and they had to take it away from him and give it to the Texas Rangers, but they tried to get it back anyway
[16:13.200 --> 16:22.200]  Because the Texas Ranger said, Texas Ranger can't investigate a complaint against a public official unless the prosecutor tells him he can't
[16:22.200 --> 16:31.200]  Well, that put us right back in the same spot. So I like to file criminal charges against the district attorney with the Texas Rangers
[16:31.200 --> 16:36.200]  Yeah, go ask him if you can investigate him, we'll see how that works out for ya
[16:36.200 --> 16:53.200]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rool Law Radio, I'm trying to clear my throat off the air this time. I just got this bad feeling that somebody is going to tattle on me, and I'm going to be in big trouble
[16:53.200 --> 17:07.200]  Brett, we'll be right back
[17:24.200 --> 17:34.200]  How to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[17:34.200 --> 17:57.200]  Michael Merris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com
[17:57.200 --> 18:04.200]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next
[18:27.200 --> 18:35.200]  Rool Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law
[18:35.200 --> 18:45.200]  You can get your own copy of this valuable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie
[18:45.200 --> 18:50.200]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[18:50.200 --> 19:00.200]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[19:20.200 --> 19:25.200]  The Texas Transportation Code
[19:25.200 --> 19:30.200]  The Texas Transportation Code
[19:30.200 --> 19:35.200]  The Texas Transportation Code
[19:35.200 --> 19:50.200]  The Texas Transportation Code
[19:50.200 --> 19:55.200]  I'm gonna tell you Brett, that really chaps my behind.
[19:55.200 --> 19:57.200]  Which is that?
[19:57.200 --> 20:00.200]  I still have my cold drink in my seat.
[20:00.200 --> 20:05.200]  Oh no. Anyway.
[20:05.200 --> 20:08.200]  That sounds better than your hot drink.
[20:08.200 --> 20:14.200]  It was the cold, unfortunately.
[20:14.200 --> 20:16.200]  Okay.
[20:16.200 --> 20:18.200]  Quaranto.
[20:18.200 --> 20:29.200]  I can't imagine we'd ever get the prosecutor to remove quaranto, but these guys need to understand, it's not about that.
[20:29.200 --> 20:36.200]  It's about great political embarrassment.
[20:36.200 --> 20:45.200]  Getting him up there having to defend himself for refusing to do his job.
[20:45.200 --> 20:48.200]  Anyway, he needs it.
[20:48.200 --> 20:50.200]  Refusing.
[20:50.200 --> 20:54.200]  I'm not clear on what is actually going on, Mary.
[20:54.200 --> 21:00.200]  The prosecutor refused to prosecute crime.
[21:00.200 --> 21:04.200]  What specifically was he refusing to do?
[21:04.200 --> 21:07.200]  Well, they want to be hard on the top.
[21:07.200 --> 21:11.200]  They started a unit that's going to prosecute police.
[21:11.200 --> 21:25.200]  And all other people, they're letting go if they're poor and stuff, and saying publicly that poor people are only doing active crime because they're hungry and have no housing.
[21:25.200 --> 21:35.200]  So this is a larger, Marxist, Communistic, Socialistic, BLM, Antifa type of reform that we saw last summer.
[21:35.200 --> 21:42.200]  So he's saying that if you're poor, it's okay.
[21:42.200 --> 21:52.200]  Well, the actions are, this last week, they basically started to lie publicly and say it's all the police officers' fault and they're not arresting people.
[21:52.200 --> 22:04.200]  Because one of the police officer officials said that the police officers are getting disengaged since the DA isn't targeting any of the crimes they're getting arrested for.
[22:04.200 --> 22:09.200]  So now the DA is using that against the police.
[22:09.200 --> 22:16.200]  So the police are up for...
[22:16.200 --> 22:21.200]  This sounds like kids on the high school parking lot.
[22:21.200 --> 22:25.200]  Well, I'd like to be able to give somebody something to do.
[22:25.200 --> 22:29.200]  I have some of my own ideas with criminal complaints.
[22:29.200 --> 22:42.200]  But this court warrant code looks a little different than I suspected, but the first sentence here in this lawsuit that our attorney general wrote against some commission in the city of Austin,
[22:42.200 --> 22:51.200]  a court warrant code is a lawsuit, quote, through which the state acts to protect itself and the good of the public generally, unquote.
[22:51.200 --> 23:02.200]  So my hope is that the public's perception of the quote warrant code is only created by precedent, which only the courts have allowed weak precedent to preside.
[23:02.200 --> 23:14.200]  So we might have to use this quote warrant code, art, in a new way, that some of these leaders aren't used to hearing, or attorneys.
[23:14.200 --> 23:17.200]  Well, from my perspective, that's even better.
[23:17.200 --> 23:20.200]  One thing they won't see it coming.
[23:20.200 --> 23:24.200]  Another, we won't actually get the prosecutor removed.
[23:24.200 --> 23:32.200]  And I never want to get a public official thrown out of office unless he's really a scoundrel.
[23:32.200 --> 23:49.200]  This is a fight between the police and the prosecutor, and this is a good way to black the prosecutor's eye for refusing to enforce law because crimes are being committed by poor people.
[23:49.200 --> 24:08.200]  Is it not the way of life that as long as we have lived in civilized society, that most of the crime is committed at white collar levels, but we don't see that.
[24:08.200 --> 24:12.200]  Never gets prosecuted, never gets mentioned.
[24:12.200 --> 24:25.200]  The only crimes that we see are the crimes here on the bottom and almost exclusively poor people.
[24:25.200 --> 24:34.200]  So he's saying all of a sudden, since poor people are poor and we feel sorry for them, it's okay?
[24:34.200 --> 24:37.200]  Am I missing something here?
[24:37.200 --> 24:41.200]  You're missing the whole Black Lives Matter movement from last summer, Randy.
[24:41.200 --> 24:44.200]  This is part of a whole antifa racism.
[24:44.200 --> 24:46.200]  This is all about racism.
[24:46.200 --> 24:49.200]  And our crime rate has doubled as of today.
[24:49.200 --> 24:55.200]  We have more murders this year than we have the whole year of last year.
[24:55.200 --> 24:59.200]  Incriminately, they're going out exponentially.
[24:59.200 --> 25:05.200]  And the newer even said a few months ago, well, that's really normal for a city of our side.
[25:05.200 --> 25:12.200]  I mean, these guys, they raised my taxes 25% in one sitting because trains weren't racist.
[25:12.200 --> 25:18.200]  I mean, if it sounds crazy, it is because it absolutely is, Randy.
[25:18.200 --> 25:22.200]  We're having a march this week over of our city.
[25:22.200 --> 25:31.200]  The more suggested that we have a strong more city platform like New York and Kumo and LA.
[25:31.200 --> 25:40.200]  And I think it's these tech companies interfering with our form of government as well as the BLM movement.
[25:40.200 --> 25:50.200]  To whose benefit is this not enforcing crime?
[25:50.200 --> 25:54.200]  Well, it's my opinion that they want to unseat the middle class,
[25:54.200 --> 26:06.200]  lower educated immigrants come in and provide labor more effectively than an informed middle class citizenry.
[26:06.200 --> 26:14.200]  Yeah, but the vast majority of this crime is in the poor neighborhood to get support people.
[26:14.200 --> 26:17.200]  Am I missing something here?
[26:17.200 --> 26:22.200]  Yes and no. It's everywhere.
[26:22.200 --> 26:27.200]  You're just not getting it because you're too white, Randy. That means it must be your fault.
[26:27.200 --> 26:32.200]  Oh, okay. Same on me. I'm too white.
[26:32.200 --> 26:35.200]  All that's being said, you know, I...
[26:35.200 --> 26:40.200]  If I gave you the keys to my car, would I be less white?
[26:40.200 --> 26:44.200]  You'd be less white if you were toothless and homeless and begging for money on the district.
[26:44.200 --> 26:46.200]  Then you're not racist.
[26:46.200 --> 26:48.200]  I got the toothless part.
[26:48.200 --> 27:01.200]  Mary knows about that. She was there at the restaurant when I sneezed and my teeth bounced across the table.
[27:01.200 --> 27:08.200]  But she was polite enough not to mention it.
[27:08.200 --> 27:14.200]  We had a good day. Was that the day we went to the Travis County? Or was it something, though?
[27:14.200 --> 27:20.200]  I think that's the day we filed against the governor, maybe the next day.
[27:20.200 --> 27:29.200]  Yeah, we had a big day that day, so I wasn't concerned about something silly like the dentists on the front of the table.
[27:29.200 --> 27:36.200]  Okay, well, this... it almost seems a little too insane.
[27:36.200 --> 27:46.200]  Well, it is, and I want to... I want to, you know, if I have to, I'll do the criminal complaint stuff and get that DA involved
[27:46.200 --> 27:52.200]  in one of my criminal complaints on any official or whatnot with election fraud, et cetera.
[27:52.200 --> 27:55.200]  But I did witness a crime and I have a duty to report it.
[27:55.200 --> 28:03.200]  And so if the DA ignores it because the man was black or because he was a worker for the Travis County
[28:03.200 --> 28:10.200]  or because he was a judge, then it's my understanding I can go ahead and put a criminal complaint upon him
[28:10.200 --> 28:15.200]  and that I'll levy it straight up to the attorney general if I need to without going any other steps.
[28:15.200 --> 28:24.200]  So if I have to, I'll do that. But I would really like somebody with more bearing and gravitas to like our studies
[28:24.200 --> 28:28.200]  and move the football forward. If I think of...
[28:28.200 --> 28:33.200]  I'm coming down to Austin next week. Okay.
[28:33.200 --> 28:40.200]  And I will be filing some criminal complaints against the district attorney with the grand jury.
[28:40.200 --> 28:41.200]  Oh, thank you.
[28:41.200 --> 28:45.200]  Tina, are you there?
[28:45.200 --> 28:46.200]  Hello?
[28:46.200 --> 28:48.200]  Tina, are you there?
[28:48.200 --> 28:50.200]  I'm here, yes.
[28:50.200 --> 28:54.200]  Yes, the complaints you filed against Manukin.
[28:54.200 --> 28:55.200]  Uh-huh.
[28:55.200 --> 29:16.200]  The district attorney decided that in a matter of a criminal accusation of conspiracy to induce a Texas notary to violate law
[29:16.200 --> 29:21.200]  that the prosecuting attorney doesn't have jurisdiction.
[29:21.200 --> 29:22.200]  Yes.
[29:22.200 --> 29:27.200]  Well, we'll see how that works out for him.
[29:27.200 --> 29:35.200]  I'm going to suggest he does have jurisdiction. He did have jurisdiction and he conspired with his underlings
[29:35.200 --> 29:42.200]  to secret high-level rich people from prosecution.
[29:42.200 --> 29:45.200]  And see what the grand jury thinks about that.
[29:45.200 --> 29:46.200]  Randy Kelton.
[29:46.200 --> 29:47.200]  I like it.
[29:47.200 --> 29:48.200]  Brett Fountain.
[29:48.200 --> 29:57.200]  I'm going to go to the law radio. Here with Mary and Tina. We'll be back in a minute when we get done with our sponsors.
[29:57.200 --> 30:02.200]  And I'm just kind of dragging out the time. We'll be right back.
[30:02.200 --> 30:08.200]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively affected our health?
[30:08.200 --> 30:15.200]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:15.200 --> 30:17.200]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.200 --> 30:21.200]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.200 --> 30:25.200]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.200 --> 30:27.200]  So protect your rights.
[30:27.200 --> 30:31.200]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.200 --> 30:33.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.200 --> 30:37.200]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:37.200 --> 30:41.200]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.200 --> 30:44.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.200 --> 30:48.200]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy. It's a fact.
[30:48.200 --> 30:53.200]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed.
[30:53.200 --> 30:57.200]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[30:57.200 --> 31:03.200]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry.
[31:03.200 --> 31:12.200]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:12.200 --> 31:15.200]  Researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage.
[31:15.200 --> 31:17.200]  I'm not taking any chances.
[31:17.200 --> 31:21.200]  I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[31:21.200 --> 31:46.200]  Look after Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.200 --> 31:55.200]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[31:55.200 --> 31:57.200]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[31:57.200 --> 32:22.200]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[32:22.200 --> 32:27.200]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:27.200 --> 32:35.200]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:35.200 --> 32:42.200]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[32:42.200 --> 32:49.200]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development.
[32:49.200 --> 33:01.200]  Check your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[33:01.200 --> 33:12.200]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:12.200 --> 33:25.200]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm gonna solve them to the government and prosecute them.
[33:25.200 --> 33:53.200]  Okay, let's go.
[33:53.200 --> 33:57.200]  Okay, we are back.
[33:57.200 --> 34:02.200]  And we're talking to Mary and Tina.
[34:02.200 --> 34:06.200]  Mary and Tina.
[34:06.200 --> 34:14.200]  Both of us are, both of you are kind of going in the same direction that you're after the prosecutor.
[34:14.200 --> 34:17.200]  Yes.
[34:17.200 --> 34:23.200]  That's 18 or more so than Mary.
[34:23.200 --> 34:29.200]  Will you explain what happened with your complaints?
[34:29.200 --> 34:35.200]  Now remember, I filed against the governor and he gave those to the grand jury.
[34:35.200 --> 34:50.200]  You filed against Manuk and the director of the treasury who was a Republican at the time and then he, when Trump got in, he had, he was replaced, but big money deep pockets.
[34:50.200 --> 34:56.200]  And what did the prosecution do? Eventually they were all for it, weren't they?
[34:56.200 --> 35:16.200]  And they were all for it, were wanting to take their time to go through the evidence reduction, which was extended, and it included a lot of letters from different people, including Journal Brian from the Ethics Registry Seeds.
[35:16.200 --> 35:27.200]  And then it switched to someone else. They said it was going to be presented to the grand jury in March, and that went by and said, no, I need a couple more weeks.
[35:27.200 --> 35:30.200]  Then that guy was taken off it.
[35:30.200 --> 35:39.200]  Another lady was put on, and then I get a notification that...
[35:39.200 --> 35:47.200]  Wait a minute, hold on. We're losing you behind a lot of background noise in here. It sounds like it's too far from the mic.
[35:47.200 --> 35:49.200]  Okay, maybe this way.
[35:49.200 --> 35:50.200]  The mic's too soft.
[35:50.200 --> 35:51.200]  Is this better?
[35:51.200 --> 35:53.200]  Is this better?
[35:53.200 --> 35:56.200]  No, not much, but the background's better.
[35:56.200 --> 36:12.200]  Yep, so the second person is now not with the age office. She was the one who first told me it was going to be presented, and then when I asked where it was, they said, we don't have anything by that name.
[36:12.200 --> 36:18.200]  We don't have this. We have nothing with your name or anything on it, and we need a case number.
[36:18.200 --> 36:30.200]  Of course, I haven't been given a case number, so I contacted the guy who was initially off for this, and he said he didn't know what was going on, but he would find out.
[36:30.200 --> 36:45.200]  And then two days later, I get that letter saying that because the property is in California and I'm in California, that they have no jurisdiction because some element has to have happened in the state.
[36:45.200 --> 37:01.200]  Well, as I send you the email, the letters came from Texas, the notary problems were in Texas, and two of the attorneys that were against me, including one of the trustees, just two trustees, were in Texas.
[37:01.200 --> 37:07.200]  So how much more do I need to be in Texas for one element at least to be there?
[37:07.200 --> 37:17.200]  And I think it's political because now the governor is average, a Republican, and he is.
[37:17.200 --> 37:19.200]  He's a Republican, yes.
[37:19.200 --> 37:37.200]  Yeah, and now he's in favor with the people, and so maybe it's all tied to the political statements because Trump is backing him and, you know, they're all for Trump.
[37:37.200 --> 37:51.200]  So because Mnuchin was part of Trump's team, I'm wondering if that's why they don't want to go after him now and came up with an excuse?
[37:51.200 --> 37:54.200]  Well, it wasn't a very good one.
[37:54.200 --> 37:56.200]  No, it wasn't.
[37:56.200 --> 38:07.200]  Because I didn't buy that excuse, and I will be back next week when I go down to Austin, I have a presentation to do down there.
[38:07.200 --> 38:19.200]  I will give a presentation to the Travis County grand jury, except this one will be against the district attorney.
[38:19.200 --> 38:30.200]  I may do. Mary, do we have any Republican district judges in Travis County?
[38:30.200 --> 38:34.200]  I'm sorry, I do not know.
[38:34.200 --> 38:38.200]  What? You're supposed to know everything.
[38:38.200 --> 38:42.200]  Yes, Mary, everything.
[38:42.200 --> 39:02.200]  There is a Republican district judge that I can petition for to impanel a court of inquiry into the district attorney.
[39:02.200 --> 39:04.200]  That should get interesting.
[39:04.200 --> 39:06.200]  I might want to look that up, Mary.
[39:06.200 --> 39:10.200]  I can call somebody and ask.
[39:10.200 --> 39:16.200]  They've not responded at all to any of my other 126 complaints.
[39:16.200 --> 39:24.200]  And they didn't respond ever to the one about George Scotting, who was Mnuchin's second in charge.
[39:24.200 --> 39:27.200]  Can you send me all of those?
[39:27.200 --> 39:29.200]  Yes, I can.
[39:29.200 --> 39:44.200]  When I'm there, I will ask which grand jury these went before, and I want to see the minutes of the grand jury for whichever grand jury saw these.
[39:44.200 --> 39:56.200]  That's going to tighten some anal sphincter muscles, because here we have a prosecutor deciding who he wants to prosecute and who he doesn't.
[39:56.200 --> 40:00.200]  And that's the question I need before the courts.
[40:00.200 --> 40:07.200]  Does the prosecutor get to decide who he wants to prosecute?
[40:07.200 --> 40:14.200]  And where are my complaints given to some magistrate?
[40:14.200 --> 40:19.200]  And while I'm there, I'll dig out a bunch of the records.
[40:19.200 --> 40:38.200]  And while I don't find proper 16.17 orders of how criminal charges against the arresting officers and bar grievances against the accused lawyers and the prosecutor, all of them for engaging in an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
[40:38.200 --> 40:42.200]  That's what my lawsuit is about.
[40:42.200 --> 41:00.200]  I'm alleging an ongoing criminal conspiracy by the prosecutor, and I'll file against this prosecutor, and he'll figure out that I'm now coming after him.
[41:00.200 --> 41:07.200]  So we'll see if that has a political ramification. What do you think, Mary?
[41:07.200 --> 41:17.200]  I think that's great. What were they alleging a criminal criminal conspiracy on to camper with a clerk or something?
[41:17.200 --> 41:23.200]  Okay, here's the conspiracy. A person is arrested.
[41:23.200 --> 41:35.200]  A complaint is supposed to be given to some magistrate and then forwarded to the clerk of the court, and then the clerk of the court will give it to the prosecutor attorney to prosecute.
[41:35.200 --> 41:54.200]  And there should be a 16.17 order, but there's not because prosecutors have directed police not to take people directly to the nearest magistrate, but rather take them to jail and toss them in jail.
[41:54.200 --> 41:58.200]  Because the prosecutor doesn't want to have to prosecute.
[41:58.200 --> 42:10.200]  If there's somebody in jail and they can't afford bail, they just leave them there until they make a deal. They will eventually make a deal to get out of jail.
[42:10.200 --> 42:19.200]  If nothing else, time served. They don't care how long they sit in jail. They'll come to them every month or so and offer them a deal if they don't take it, they just leave them there.
[42:19.200 --> 42:32.200]  The person gets out on bail, then they call them in once a month for nothing. No reason, just make them take a day off work, come down to court, and they stumble one time.
[42:32.200 --> 42:41.200]  They get arrested, get their bond revoked, they go back to jail, they sit in jail, and you get to force a deal out of them. You don't have to try cases.
[42:41.200 --> 43:00.200]  I live in Wise County. I was at the District Judge's Office. Excuse me, they were having a criminal trial, and the prosecutor, in his opening statement to the jurors, apologized for the ramshackle nature of things.
[43:00.200 --> 43:18.200]  They were moving things around in the courtroom, but this is the first criminal trial we've had in this court since March of last year, a year and a half.
[43:18.200 --> 43:45.200]  This was June of this year. A year and a quarter, no criminal trials. Everybody took the deal, and in getting them to take the deal, he forces these people to sit in jail pre-trial, and that pre-trial incarceration is costing the state of Texas $990 million a year
[43:45.200 --> 44:00.200]  so that prosecuting attorneys don't have to prosecute their cases. Hang on, Randy Kelham, Brett Fountain, Rooval Radio, I call in number 5126461984. We'll be right back.
[44:00.200 --> 44:17.200]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.200 --> 44:31.200]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[44:31.200 --> 44:47.200]  In fact, we have come to trust young Jevity so much. We became a marketing distributor, along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[44:47.200 --> 45:01.200]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[45:01.200 --> 45:19.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.200 --> 45:34.200]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.200 --> 45:43.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.200 --> 45:52.200]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.200 --> 46:14.200]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:23.200 --> 46:35.200]  Yes, always I must be careful what I'm wishing for. When I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for.
[46:35.200 --> 46:53.200]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton. I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons. I'll give my message out if anyone is shouting distance.
[46:53.200 --> 47:06.200]  Oh, for bravery and to guest slave which show in business and first I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting.
[47:06.200 --> 47:24.200]  This is what I'm alleging. The county commissioners courts around the state are paying $990 million a year in free trial confinement.
[47:24.200 --> 47:36.200]  The state of Texas as a whole is paying $3.4 billion for the entire criminal justice system.
[47:36.200 --> 47:58.200]  And half of it, $990 million for pre-trial incarceration and another $254 million for court of warning counsel. That's $2.2 billion pre-trial and that's because prosecutors aren't prosecuting.
[47:58.200 --> 48:10.200]  They're just throwing people in jail and meowing them there at 50-something bucks a day so the prosecutor doesn't have to prosecute and they have to bother just so he can clear his docket.
[48:10.200 --> 48:13.200]  That is insane.
[48:13.200 --> 48:39.200]  The cure? Get on the phone and call a magistrate. If you're a policeman and you arrest someone, don't take him directly to jail because if you do, this Randy Calton SOB is going to go down and look in the record and when he sees the record of a crime and he doesn't see a 16.17 order by a magistrate finding probable cause,
[48:39.200 --> 48:56.200]  he's going to file a first degree felony charges against the arresting officer and a T. Cole complaint and a bar grievance against the accused person's lawyer for not filing the exact motion that I'm filing.
[48:56.200 --> 48:58.200]  Beautiful.
[48:58.200 --> 49:11.200]  Bar grievance against the prosecutor, criminal charges against the prosecutor, judicial conduct complaint against the judge and criminal complaint of criminal conspiracy against the judge.
[49:11.200 --> 49:20.200]  Every single arrest in the state of Texas is patently illegal.
[49:20.200 --> 49:38.200]  And the court has zero jurisdiction so we start landing on him. So I'm going to take Tina's complaints and file against the prosecutor for refusing to prosecute.
[49:38.200 --> 49:45.200]  And in his letter he lied to Tina so he didn't have jurisdiction.
[49:45.200 --> 49:46.200]  Yeah.
[49:46.200 --> 49:55.200]  It didn't matter if he had jurisdiction or not. He had to give that some magistrate because it wasn't a 16.17 order in the record.
[49:55.200 --> 50:01.200]  That means the person hadn't been arrested and brought before a magistrate.
[50:01.200 --> 50:05.200]  He had knowledge that a crime had been committed.
[50:05.200 --> 50:09.200]  He had it in the form of a verified criminal affidavit.
[50:09.200 --> 50:17.200]  He had a duty to present that to some magistrate. I think it's, Grant, what is it, 204, 205 or 206?
[50:17.200 --> 50:21.200]  One of those three tells him he's to give the complaint to some magistrate.
[50:21.200 --> 50:26.200]  Yeah, I think that might be, I don't know if there's two, yeah, 203 or two, yeah.
[50:26.200 --> 50:38.200]  203 is specific to public officials but a 456 is just your standard criminal procedure and one of the steps is to give the complaint to some magistrate.
[50:38.200 --> 50:40.200]  He had duty to do that.
[50:40.200 --> 50:45.200]  It didn't matter what he thought about the sufficiency of the charges.
[50:45.200 --> 50:53.200]  That's not his determination to make. That's a magistrate's determination to make.
[50:53.200 --> 50:59.200]  So I'm going to nail him on point of law and every single arrest.
[50:59.200 --> 51:10.200]  I've got 100 cases from Tarrant County. While I'm down there, I'll get probably 100, maybe 200 from Travis County.
[51:10.200 --> 51:13.200]  And I'm likely to have to go on down to Victoria County.
[51:13.200 --> 51:21.200]  I'll get a bunch from there and start filing these complaints for all these people who have been arrested.
[51:21.200 --> 51:28.200]  Bar grievances against all the lawyers. That's going to be the most influential thing I suspect.
[51:28.200 --> 51:36.200]  I did that here in Wise County. I had 35 lawyers but some of them didn't have bar card numbers so I had to look them up.
[51:36.200 --> 51:44.200]  And this one I looked up, there were three of them by the same name. One in Decatur, Texas where I'm at.
[51:44.200 --> 51:45.200]  Oh yeah.
[51:45.200 --> 51:51.200]  Where the guy was arrested. One in Fort Worth and one in Dallas.
[51:51.200 --> 51:58.200]  So I said, my goodness, I wonder which one it could be.
[51:58.200 --> 52:04.200]  I take the guy at Fort Worth. So I filed in him instead of the one in Decatur.
[52:04.200 --> 52:11.200]  Well, sometimes serendipity steps in. A lot of times you do this stuff, you never know if it works or not.
[52:11.200 --> 52:24.200]  A policeman and I helped him keep his job several years ago. His son was in trouble. His son has slight autism and he gets in trouble a lot.
[52:24.200 --> 52:32.200]  And he's having legal issues and he was talking to his lawyer and he mentioned my name and he said the lawyer went off.
[52:32.200 --> 52:42.200]  And I told me he barred me and it was for somebody who wasn't even my client.
[52:42.200 --> 52:48.200]  That gave me so much pleasure.
[52:48.200 --> 52:53.200]  I call the lawyer, oh my goodness, I understand I barred you by mistake.
[52:53.200 --> 53:02.200]  Oh, I am so sorry about that. My bad. What I didn't tell him is I did it on purpose.
[53:02.200 --> 53:08.200]  I knew he would call this other lawyer and give that lawyer an earful.
[53:08.200 --> 53:09.200]  Yeah.
[53:09.200 --> 53:13.200]  Better for him to hear it from that guy than from you.
[53:13.200 --> 53:18.200]  Oh, that was, I laughed until I heard over that one.
[53:18.200 --> 53:29.200]  Okay, we should not be that devious. We should be straight up law abiding and fair.
[53:29.200 --> 53:33.200]  Anyway, that's the issue of bringing.
[53:33.200 --> 53:40.200]  And that Mary is the issue I want you to take to the police association.
[53:40.200 --> 53:49.200]  See, look guys, the reason you're having these problems is prosecutor. He's one screwed up everything.
[53:49.200 --> 53:58.200]  The public are upset at you because they think you have the power to arrest and imprison and you do.
[53:58.200 --> 54:01.200]  And you are never intended to have that power.
[54:01.200 --> 54:10.200]  What they intended was that the individual have an opportunity to be heard.
[54:10.200 --> 54:20.200]  I told us to a judge of one in Johnson County that I do this radio show and have people calling in seeking remedy.
[54:20.200 --> 54:27.200]  Barrett last night is a great example. Barrett was not looking for remedy.
[54:27.200 --> 54:31.200]  He just wanted to be heard.
[54:31.200 --> 54:40.200]  He was arrested thrown in jail for an out of state warrant and the judge looked at it and threw the warrant and trash and let the guy out.
[54:40.200 --> 54:44.200]  But he never got to be heard.
[54:44.200 --> 54:54.200]  So what I didn't want him to do is if you arrest somebody before you risk this Randy Kelton character filing criminal charges against you, call the magistrate.
[54:54.200 --> 54:56.200]  It's his job.
[54:56.200 --> 55:00.200]  Don't care if the magistrate is busy. Don't care if you don't want to do it. It's his job.
[55:00.200 --> 55:03.200]  That's why magistrates were put in place.
[55:03.200 --> 55:05.200]  Tell the magistrate what you got.
[55:05.200 --> 55:08.200]  Give the accused an opportunity to talk to the magistrate.
[55:08.200 --> 55:14.200]  And the magistrate decides if you go to jail or not, not the officer.
[55:14.200 --> 55:19.200]  So now if the officer takes you to jail, it's not on his volition.
[55:19.200 --> 55:24.200]  It's because the magistrate told him to.
[55:24.200 --> 55:31.200]  And he had an opportunity to air his side to the magistrate.
[55:31.200 --> 55:37.200]  That will pretty well fix this gap between the public and the police.
[55:37.200 --> 55:46.200]  And it's also likely to dramatically decrease pretrial incarceration.
[55:46.200 --> 55:53.200]  Save the state a whole lot of money that they could put back into policing.
[55:53.200 --> 55:57.200]  Does that sound like so much hogwash?
[55:57.200 --> 56:00.200]  Very well thought.
[56:00.200 --> 56:04.200]  It may be hogwash, but it sounds good.
[56:04.200 --> 56:09.200]  And then we get the police come in and bring in the solution.
[56:09.200 --> 56:10.200]  Yeah.
[56:10.200 --> 56:13.200]  Don't blame us. We're not the reason this is a problem.
[56:13.200 --> 56:18.200]  You guys are not doing your job. We're doing ours.
[56:18.200 --> 56:22.200]  Do we think you could sell that one?
[56:22.200 --> 56:24.200]  Well, I can tell some of it.
[56:24.200 --> 56:28.200]  The court warrantor here from the attorney general in California says
[56:28.200 --> 56:32.200]  court warrantor of the special form of legal action used to resolve a dispute
[56:32.200 --> 56:38.200]  over whether a specific person has a legal right to hold the public office that he occupies.
[56:38.200 --> 56:42.200]  Court warrantor is used to tell the person legal right to hold an office
[56:42.200 --> 56:45.200]  not to evaluate a person's performance in the office.
[56:45.200 --> 56:49.200]  For example, a court warrantor action may be brought to determine
[56:49.200 --> 56:54.200]  whether a public official satisfies a requirement that he or she resides in the district
[56:54.200 --> 57:00.200]  or perhaps whether a public official is serving in two incompatible offices.
[57:00.200 --> 57:06.200]  Court warrantor is not unavailable to decide whether an official has committed misconduct in office.
[57:06.200 --> 57:12.200]  A person who commits misconduct in a public office may be penalized or even removed from office,
[57:12.200 --> 57:16.200]  but court warrantor is not the proper form in those cases.
[57:16.200 --> 57:19.200]  Other processes are available for that purpose.
[57:19.200 --> 57:23.200]  Whoa, what other? I don't know of any other processes.
[57:23.200 --> 57:26.200]  There may be in California, but it's not in Texas.
[57:26.200 --> 57:28.200]  Okay.
[57:28.200 --> 57:30.200]  There's nothing in Texas.
[57:30.200 --> 57:35.200]  And I'm saying breach of contract.
[57:35.200 --> 57:39.200]  He's abdicated to contract.
[57:39.200 --> 57:41.200]  Okay.
[57:41.200 --> 57:50.200]  Intentionally and publicly refused to perform a required function of the contract.
[57:50.200 --> 57:53.200]  So he's repudiated contract.
[57:53.200 --> 57:59.200]  He's no longer has a right to be paid.
[57:59.200 --> 58:03.200]  If court warrant doesn't cover that, it should.
[58:03.200 --> 58:09.200]  Because I know of no other mechanism to remove a public official from office in Texas.
[58:09.200 --> 58:18.200]  The beginning state, through which the state acts to protect itself and the good of the public in general?
[58:18.200 --> 58:21.200]  From Texas.
[58:21.200 --> 58:27.200]  Okay. Read that again, because that was pretty good. We've got about 25 seconds quickly.
[58:27.200 --> 58:32.200]  Through which the state acts to protect itself and the good of the public generally?
[58:32.200 --> 58:38.200]  Fuller Springs v. State in left hand, 1974, Texas.
[58:38.200 --> 58:40.200]  Okay. That's what we're saying.
[58:40.200 --> 58:44.200]  The people that have been denied equal protection of the laws, hang on.
[58:44.200 --> 58:50.200]  About to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Lula Radio.
[58:50.200 --> 58:54.200]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.200 --> 59:01.200]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.200 --> 59:06.200]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.200 --> 59:13.200]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.200 --> 59:18.200]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.200 --> 59:27.200]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:27.200 --> 59:40.200]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.200 --> 59:44.200]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:44.200 --> 01:00:00.200]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:00.200 --> 01:00:15.200]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:30.200 --> 01:00:59.200]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and injuring 40.
[01:00:59.200 --> 01:01:04.200]  Today in history.
[01:01:04.200 --> 01:01:19.200]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven to tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones,
[01:01:19.200 --> 01:01:34.200]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:34.200 --> 01:01:52.200]  In addition, the attorney general stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities too, like the district attorney in El Paso,
[01:01:52.200 --> 01:02:08.200]  Kaima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote,
[01:02:08.200 --> 01:02:22.200]  the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:02:22.200 --> 01:02:39.200]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.200 --> 01:02:54.200]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:54.200 --> 01:03:12.200]  The book wrote it with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:12.200 --> 01:03:28.200]  I read his book and it says he cares not over the unsightly. These warm unders come by that term rightly.
[01:03:28.200 --> 01:03:46.200]  I will pay for the war with my body. I ain't gonna pay for the car with my money. I won't pay for the fun with my body. Just plant a wicked analogic shotty. I ain't gonna pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:46.200 --> 01:03:58.200]  Okay, we are back. Andy Kelton. I haven't had too much fun on the bridge. Okay, Mary, we've used an hour. We've probably beat this horse to death.
[01:03:58.200 --> 01:04:21.200]  This is indicated. I was reading some other of the pages. This is in 2021, current with the legislation from the 2021 session. An action in the nature of quote, warrant help is available if, one, a person you serve intrudes into or unlawfully holds or executes a franchise or an office,
[01:04:21.200 --> 01:04:34.200]  including an office in a corporation created by the authority of the state. I don't know. I don't know. I'm getting kind of... Here we go. One more thing I'll say. I don't know.
[01:04:34.200 --> 01:04:40.200]  I hope it can allow it. If not, I'll have to look into what is the next best thing.
[01:04:40.200 --> 01:04:54.200]  Okay. Don't bring it up yet until we're certain. Send me the case law. Let me have a look at it and I can bounce off of that. See if I can find a way to easily get in there.
[01:04:54.200 --> 01:05:07.200]  Okay. All right. We'll have to do some research. I jumped apart and already drafted and sent the email, but I guess I'll have to do a little more research.
[01:05:07.200 --> 01:05:10.200]  Thank you very much, Mary.
[01:05:10.200 --> 01:05:12.200]  Thank you.
[01:05:12.200 --> 01:05:17.200]  Okay. Now we're going to go to Miss Tina.
[01:05:17.200 --> 01:05:18.200]  Okay.
[01:05:18.200 --> 01:05:22.200]  Okay. Miss, that kind of bushwhacked you earlier there.
[01:05:22.200 --> 01:05:32.200]  That's okay. Regarding, you know what I was talking about last night and that case where it moved my date up to November the 10th,
[01:05:32.200 --> 01:05:37.200]  but it was 40 days after the hearing for the motion to strike.
[01:05:37.200 --> 01:05:43.200]  And I was starting on my, you know, objection to it, like you said.
[01:05:43.200 --> 01:05:57.200]  And then this afternoon, I got emailed a notification that they have moved their motion to strike to November the 10th.
[01:05:57.200 --> 01:06:11.200]  Everything now is on November the 10th, but I still, you know, I mean, can you think about what the judge is thinking when she's put their motion to strike?
[01:06:11.200 --> 01:06:20.200]  That's what I said last night. The judge probably didn't remember that that hearing existed and somebody reminded her.
[01:06:20.200 --> 01:06:26.200]  And she said, oops, we got to fix that.
[01:06:26.200 --> 01:06:41.200]  But they're both on the same day. So my motion to get, have for the time, whether I get court appointed to cancel is on the same day now as the other side of the motion to strike, if you know.
[01:06:41.200 --> 01:06:58.200]  And you might write a letter objecting to that because if your motion to strike court appointed counsel is approved, then attempting to have this hearing would leave you without counsel.
[01:06:58.200 --> 01:07:00.200]  Yeah.
[01:07:00.200 --> 01:07:07.200]  So it's just, it's just an administrative thing that should not be hard to do.
[01:07:07.200 --> 01:07:18.200]  Okay. Well, I send you a copy of what I started to write and I think what I'll do is to call the clerk office on Monday and see if they can give me any clues on what's going on.
[01:07:18.200 --> 01:07:28.200]  And, you know, finally there are an objection or a declaration or something, but I put just a few sentences down and if you get chance to look at it, then let me know.
[01:07:28.200 --> 01:07:48.200]  And then the second thing I wanted to ask is, I keep getting asked by people just recently about why churches, names and courts are on Bloomberg and they have a price code and such like, what, what if anything, does that affect, does that have on...
[01:07:48.200 --> 01:07:51.200]  Wait, the name is on what?
[01:07:51.200 --> 01:07:54.200]  It's on Bloomberg, listed on Bloomberg.
[01:07:54.200 --> 01:07:56.200]  Bloomberg.
[01:07:56.200 --> 01:07:59.200]  Oh.
[01:07:59.200 --> 01:08:05.200]  I have no idea. You know, I've heard rumors that...
[01:08:05.200 --> 01:08:08.200]  I don't know. I have no idea.
[01:08:08.200 --> 01:08:15.200]  You know, the thing about bonds and all kind of stuff that's never been substantiated.
[01:08:15.200 --> 01:08:19.200]  Who's not on Bloomberg?
[01:08:19.200 --> 01:08:26.200]  Well, I wonder why a judge is themselves. I can understand the court, but why is a judge?
[01:08:26.200 --> 01:08:39.200]  I don't know. Who works with that kind of information? You know, a few years ago there was a really big deal about bonds and such.
[01:08:39.200 --> 01:08:47.200]  And I talked to a guy who worked for Bloomberg and he said, if you put in a string of numbers, there are so many bonds for so many different things.
[01:08:47.200 --> 01:08:55.200]  If you put in the numbers in your birth certificate, you're going to get a hit on one of those bonds.
[01:08:55.200 --> 01:09:07.200]  It's going to have absolutely nothing to do with you. It's just a bond somebody filed, but there's so many of them out there that 90% of the time you're going to get a hit on one.
[01:09:07.200 --> 01:09:16.200]  And these guys are saying that since the birth certificate number and this number is the same, somehow they're necessarily connected.
[01:09:16.200 --> 01:09:29.200]  Well, no, they're not. We all get to use numbers. The only one that has unique numbers is the post office.
[01:09:29.200 --> 01:09:34.200]  When you get a green card, that number on there, that's a unique number.
[01:09:34.200 --> 01:09:40.200]  It's never been used anywhere else, but they're the only ones it's got on, as far as I know.
[01:09:40.200 --> 01:09:43.200]  So I have no idea what that would be.
[01:09:43.200 --> 01:09:51.200]  Okay. Well, maybe I'll just take an example and post it in your law group and see if anyone knows in there.
[01:09:51.200 --> 01:09:55.200]  And then she'll shed any light on the subject because I have no idea.
[01:09:55.200 --> 01:10:07.200]  But I've seen one of my judges listed. I've seen a court and then somebody showed me another judge that's involved in a case also listed there.
[01:10:07.200 --> 01:10:15.200]  It'd be nice to just understand it, whether it's got any value to it or not, just to understand why it's there.
[01:10:15.200 --> 01:10:22.200]  And you reminded me of something. I am coming to Austin Wednesday and I will be doing a presentation.
[01:10:22.200 --> 01:10:28.200]  If anybody, just an introduction to the seminar that I'm going to do on the 28th.
[01:10:28.200 --> 01:10:35.200]  If anybody wants to go to it, send me an email and I'll get you the location.
[01:10:35.200 --> 01:10:38.200]  It'll be in the evening on Wednesday.
[01:10:38.200 --> 01:10:42.200]  And then on the 28th, I'm doing a all day seminar.
[01:10:42.200 --> 01:10:53.200]  If anybody wants to be there, send me an email and I'll get it to the right people and they'll contact you and hoping to have a room full.
[01:10:53.200 --> 01:10:58.200]  I kept forgetting to announce my own project.
[01:10:58.200 --> 01:11:03.200]  Well, I wish I could be there, but it's too far away right now.
[01:11:03.200 --> 01:11:10.200]  Okay, well, I've got a guy that's trying to put one together in California.
[01:11:10.200 --> 01:11:16.200]  So when I get that one going, Bob in California, he's trying to get one together out there.
[01:11:16.200 --> 01:11:22.200]  But I don't know if he's having much luck, but we'll see how I want to see how this one goes.
[01:11:22.200 --> 01:11:26.200]  If it goes as well as I expected to, then I'll start pushing to set up some more.
[01:11:26.200 --> 01:11:37.200]  So if anybody's interested, just send me an email, Randy at rule of law radio, and I'll get you some information on the specifics.
[01:11:37.200 --> 01:11:44.200]  Okay, I interrupted you, Tina, with a little shameless self-promotion.
[01:11:44.200 --> 01:11:54.200]  Yes, well, I'll send you a couple of websites that I think you should list it on, just so you can see to get more people.
[01:11:54.200 --> 01:11:57.200]  Okay, I will do that. Good.
[01:11:57.200 --> 01:12:03.200]  Okay, so let's go to other people. Thank you for answering my question about this call.
[01:12:03.200 --> 01:12:11.200]  Okay, thank you very much, Ms. Tina. Okay, now we're going to Scott in Michigan.
[01:12:11.200 --> 01:12:14.200]  Hello, Scott in Michigan.
[01:12:14.200 --> 01:12:16.200]  You guys, how's it going?
[01:12:16.200 --> 01:12:20.200]  Going good. What do you have for us today?
[01:12:20.200 --> 01:12:26.200]  Well, it was interesting that the call warrant was brought up.
[01:12:26.200 --> 01:12:37.200]  I guess that might be a direction for me, but I was more curious about interlocutory appeal.
[01:12:37.200 --> 01:12:47.200]  The judge told me at arraignment that my emotion to dismiss was premature, which I thought was kind of odd.
[01:12:47.200 --> 01:12:52.200]  What was the nature of your emotion to dismiss?
[01:12:52.200 --> 01:12:59.200]  It was for a challenge to jurisdiction.
[01:12:59.200 --> 01:13:02.200]  It was premature?
[01:13:02.200 --> 01:13:04.200]  Yeah, yeah, I mean...
[01:13:04.200 --> 01:13:08.200]  Interesting. Wonder how that works.
[01:13:08.200 --> 01:13:23.200]  Yeah, in my objection, I underlined it by saying just to be clear, a demure was declared anachronistic at the first appearance of an accused person.
[01:13:23.200 --> 01:13:27.200]  I mean, there's no other time to bring it right off that, right?
[01:13:27.200 --> 01:13:32.200]  That's the perfectly appropriate time to bring that.
[01:13:32.200 --> 01:13:50.200]  Yeah, so based on the fact that it was declared premature and he tried to sweep it under the rug, I think I'm already at a disembarking point to go to the court above and say, you know, I'm not being heard.
[01:13:50.200 --> 01:14:02.200]  I think that's exactly the best maneuver, because if the judge can do nothing until he's established jurisdiction.
[01:14:02.200 --> 01:14:09.200]  Absolutely. They treat it like a foregone conclusion, and that's another part of my objection.
[01:14:09.200 --> 01:14:25.200]  There's something that's got to be established with facts and law by the prosecution. The prosecutor bears that burden and the judge can't fulfill a form with a wink and a nod.
[01:14:25.200 --> 01:14:33.200]  Well, actually, I'm going to say the prosecutor does not bear that burden. The judge bears that burden.
[01:14:33.200 --> 01:14:40.200]  The prosecutor is not telling you to do stuff and threatening to put you in jail if you don't. The judge is.
[01:14:40.200 --> 01:14:53.200]  And before the judge can order you around, he has to establish that he has authority to do that. Otherwise, he's acting in his personal capacity.
[01:14:53.200 --> 01:15:08.200]  And until he's heard that subject matter jurisdiction, he's in his personal capacity. Did he do anything substantive, subsequent to denying your or refusing to hear your subject matter jurisdiction challenge?
[01:15:08.200 --> 01:15:16.200]  Yes, he entered a plea without my knowledge, consent or abolition.
[01:15:16.200 --> 01:15:26.200]  And that should get official misconduct against him. Have you been brought before a magistrate?
[01:15:26.200 --> 01:15:41.200]  I haven't even opened that can of worms with him, but that's, I mean, I wrote an 18-page, wrote an 18-page, you know, due process review and motion to dismiss that's based on that claim.
[01:15:41.200 --> 01:15:44.200]  But I haven't submitted that one yet.
[01:15:44.200 --> 01:15:51.200]  Good, good. This is a great issue and it's a nice, clean issue.
[01:15:51.200 --> 01:16:02.200]  I asked about examining trial, but that would have clouded the issue. You did it better. It's absolutely clean.
[01:16:02.200 --> 01:16:06.200]  The only thing before the court now is subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:16:06.200 --> 01:16:08.200]  Yes.
[01:16:08.200 --> 01:16:29.200]  And his refusal, that should make for one that will very likely to pick up, you know, in Texas, 12% of the, the motions for mandamus are picked up and 2% are ruled in favor of the filer.
[01:16:29.200 --> 01:16:41.200]  The one we did, pro se, got picked up and ruled in favor of the filer and it was pro se, but it went directly to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:16:41.200 --> 01:16:42.200]  Okay.
[01:16:42.200 --> 01:16:47.200]  It would be nice if you sting that judge right off.
[01:16:47.200 --> 01:16:53.200]  He's the chief judge. As long as it's coming right up on the chance.
[01:16:53.200 --> 01:17:00.200]  Okay. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.200 --> 01:17:05.200]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.200 --> 01:17:21.200]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris proven method. Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:17:21.200 --> 01:17:29.200]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:29.200 --> 01:17:41.200]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.200 --> 01:17:49.200]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.200 --> 01:17:57.200]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.200 --> 01:18:00.200]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.200 --> 01:18:10.200]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without logos.
[01:18:10.200 --> 01:18:22.200]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.200 --> 01:18:27.200]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:27.200 --> 01:18:31.200]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.200 --> 01:18:37.200]  Now, go to logosregualnetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.200 --> 01:18:43.200]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.200 --> 01:18:44.200]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.200 --> 01:18:45.200]  No.
[01:18:45.200 --> 01:18:47.200]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.200 --> 01:18:48.200]  No.
[01:18:48.200 --> 01:18:49.200]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.200 --> 01:18:50.200]  No.
[01:18:50.200 --> 01:18:51.200]  I mean yes.
[01:18:51.200 --> 01:18:57.200]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.200 --> 01:18:58.200]  We are Logos.
[01:18:58.200 --> 01:19:00.200]  Happy Holidays Logos.
[01:19:00.200 --> 01:19:11.200]  This is the Logos Radio with Net Radio.
[01:19:11.200 --> 01:19:26.200]  This is the Logos Radio with Net Radio.
[01:19:26.200 --> 01:19:41.200]  Well, it ain't gonna pull me without the same old trick again. I was blindsided but now I can see your plan.
[01:19:41.200 --> 01:19:55.200]  You put the beer in my pocket, took the money from my hand. Ain't gonna pull me without the same old trick again.
[01:19:55.200 --> 01:20:02.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Logos Radio, and we're talking to Scott in Michigan.
[01:20:02.200 --> 01:20:08.200]  Okay, hello, Scott. I was having too much fun on the break.
[01:20:08.200 --> 01:20:13.200]  Well, I know when we were having too much fun before the break, talking about all the amazing things.
[01:20:13.200 --> 01:20:16.200]  I thought you were suggesting that I definitely sing the judge.
[01:20:16.200 --> 01:20:21.200]  That would be a lot of fun because he happens to be the chief judge of the four numbers.
[01:20:21.200 --> 01:20:24.200]  And he should know better.
[01:20:24.200 --> 01:20:34.200]  And so it should be simple enough.
[01:20:34.200 --> 01:20:40.200]  The issue is not complicated at all.
[01:20:40.200 --> 01:20:47.200]  Do you have my boulder on jurisdiction?
[01:20:47.200 --> 01:20:55.200]  I don't think so. We keep maybe missing trading off that boulder.
[01:20:55.200 --> 01:21:00.200]  Okay, I have located it. My research section has gone for a while, but I located it.
[01:21:00.200 --> 01:21:07.200]  So send me an email asking me for my jurisdiction folder and I'll send that to you.
[01:21:07.200 --> 01:21:17.200]  Now, do you think I should definitely go with the beat singer team or how about back to the interlocutor idea?
[01:21:17.200 --> 01:21:25.200]  Oh, no, this is not grounds for interlocutory. This is grounds for mandamus.
[01:21:25.200 --> 01:21:26.200]  Okay.
[01:21:26.200 --> 01:21:32.200]  It wouldn't be interlocutory because he did not render a ruling.
[01:21:32.200 --> 01:21:43.200]  An interlocutory appeal goes to a ruling in the court that will adversely affect the rest of the proceedings.
[01:21:43.200 --> 01:21:46.200]  So you ask the court to look at that.
[01:21:46.200 --> 01:21:53.200]  In this case, this goes to a random mandamus. This is something the judge did not do that he had an absolute duty to do.
[01:21:53.200 --> 01:21:59.200]  And you're going to ask the court of appeals to order him to do that duty.
[01:21:59.200 --> 01:22:04.200]  With the mandamus, not with an interlocutory.
[01:22:04.200 --> 01:22:08.200]  Not interlocutory. Interlocutory is not called for yet.
[01:22:08.200 --> 01:22:12.200]  Okay.
[01:22:12.200 --> 01:22:18.200]  Okay, and a mandamus goes to the court above. That's something I take to the circuit court.
[01:22:18.200 --> 01:22:27.200]  No, a mandamus almost always goes to court of appeals. Check your state, but generally it always goes to an appellate court.
[01:22:27.200 --> 01:22:30.200]  So go two courts up is what you're saying.
[01:22:30.200 --> 01:22:32.200]  Yes.
[01:22:32.200 --> 01:22:34.200]  Okay. Okay, yeah.
[01:22:34.200 --> 01:22:45.200]  That's better. You jump him right into the court of appeals because this goes to a, you're asking for a ruling on point of law.
[01:22:45.200 --> 01:22:50.200]  And generally they want the appellate court to do that.
[01:22:50.200 --> 01:22:51.200]  Well, I have another point.
[01:22:51.200 --> 01:22:53.200]  Yeah, that's a pretty clean one.
[01:22:53.200 --> 01:22:56.200]  What's that, Brad?
[01:22:56.200 --> 01:23:02.200]  I was saying that's a really clean point of law too. Can a court proceed without jurisdiction?
[01:23:02.200 --> 01:23:05.200]  Absolutely. Absolutely.
[01:23:05.200 --> 01:23:19.200]  The other point of law that I feel is substantial that I've also pointed out my objections to is because of the way that the arraignment situation goes in Michigan,
[01:23:19.200 --> 01:23:24.200]  the prosecutor does not come to your arraignment, so to speak.
[01:23:24.200 --> 01:23:33.200]  So my contention and my objection is that they have actually kind of split up the arraignment into two pieces,
[01:23:33.200 --> 01:23:39.200]  each one of which constitutes an ex parte proceeding.
[01:23:39.200 --> 01:23:48.200]  First, the prosecutor gets to come in and submit the charges in open court in a procedure that I'm not invited to.
[01:23:48.200 --> 01:23:56.200]  And that makes me real curious about what else we'll discuss at an open court proceeding that I wasn't invited to.
[01:23:56.200 --> 01:24:00.200]  And then when I came in for my first appearance, the prosecutor isn't there.
[01:24:00.200 --> 01:24:10.200]  I maintain that that constitutes a second ex parte proceeding at the court because the party in the interest of the plaintiff is not present.
[01:24:10.200 --> 01:24:15.200]  And that means I can't poke holes in his case or check the foundation for cracks.
[01:24:15.200 --> 01:24:22.200]  Okay, what they're going to say about an arraignment is that it is not an adversarial hearing.
[01:24:22.200 --> 01:24:25.200]  It's merely an administrative hearing.
[01:24:25.200 --> 01:24:33.200]  The purpose of arraignment is to determine the identity of the accused and take a plea. That's it.
[01:24:33.200 --> 01:24:43.200]  So it doesn't affect the adjudication of the case unless you file a subject matter jurisdiction challenge.
[01:24:43.200 --> 01:24:49.200]  Then the court is acting as if he has jurisdiction when he doesn't.
[01:24:49.200 --> 01:24:56.200]  He's forced you to come to a hearing that if you were late for that hearing, you could be thrown in jail for failure to appear.
[01:24:56.200 --> 01:25:01.200]  So he has to make sure he had power to do that.
[01:25:01.200 --> 01:25:06.200]  I see. I see.
[01:25:06.200 --> 01:25:08.200]  Okay.
[01:25:08.200 --> 01:25:13.200]  The fact that the prosecutor wasn't there on an arraignment was really irrelevant.
[01:25:13.200 --> 01:25:15.200]  There's nothing for him to do.
[01:25:15.200 --> 01:25:35.200]  I don't disagree with what you're saying, but I would just add that one of the major functions of arraignment that has to be noted is that arraignment is your chance to learn the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings against you.
[01:25:35.200 --> 01:25:37.200]  That is true.
[01:25:37.200 --> 01:25:42.200]  So with the prosecutor not being there, I'm in a huge disadvantage in terms of...
[01:25:42.200 --> 01:25:46.200]  No, no. Actually, that's not.
[01:25:46.200 --> 01:25:51.200]  An arraignment they're limited to.
[01:25:51.200 --> 01:25:53.200]  Yeah.
[01:25:53.200 --> 01:26:03.200]  In order for them to take a plea, they have to advise you of the charges against you.
[01:26:03.200 --> 01:26:04.200]  Right.
[01:26:04.200 --> 01:26:10.200]  That would seem to go to constitution, nature and cause.
[01:26:10.200 --> 01:26:20.200]  Yes, because it's more than just advising you of the charges. I mean, that's the bare minimum. If you want it to be more than that, you can certainly...
[01:26:20.200 --> 01:26:23.200]  I feel you can certainly pose relevant...
[01:26:23.200 --> 01:26:35.200]  It says nature and cause, not just cause. The cause against you is the claim against you. But what is the nature of the claim against you?
[01:26:35.200 --> 01:26:37.200]  And that takes...
[01:26:37.200 --> 01:26:42.200]  No, no. That's the cause. The cause...
[01:26:42.200 --> 01:26:51.200]  That should give you... You should have opportunity to be faced by your accuser.
[01:26:51.200 --> 01:27:02.200]  Yeah, they're going to say, I don't think we can get there at arraignment because they're going to say that arraignment is not a critical...
[01:27:02.200 --> 01:27:05.200]  It's not an adversarial hearing.
[01:27:05.200 --> 01:27:10.200]  Arraignment is necessary to bring...
[01:27:10.200 --> 01:27:19.200]  Technically, the arraignment is there to move jurisdiction from the magistrate to the court.
[01:27:19.200 --> 01:27:31.200]  They've kind of screwed all that up, but that's the only purpose, is to establish that you are the correct person and take a plea.
[01:27:31.200 --> 01:27:36.200]  If you're going to plead guilty, then that tells them the whole lot of stuff they don't have to do.
[01:27:36.200 --> 01:27:43.200]  If you plead not guilty, it tells them how to move toward the first adversarial hearing.
[01:27:43.200 --> 01:27:46.200]  Right.
[01:27:46.200 --> 01:27:58.200]  Well, whether it's adversarial or not, the criminal justice standards for the prosecution function stipulate that the prosecutor should be present at the first appearance of the accused.
[01:27:58.200 --> 01:28:01.200]  So that's the bar agreement right there.
[01:28:01.200 --> 01:28:06.200]  That'll work. And most lawyers have never read that.
[01:28:06.200 --> 01:28:14.200]  For those of you who don't know, he's talking about the American Bar Association standards for the prosecution function.
[01:28:14.200 --> 01:28:19.200]  And you'll find that on the American Bar Association website.
[01:28:19.200 --> 01:28:24.200]  That is such good stuff in there.
[01:28:24.200 --> 01:28:30.200]  Prosecutor's prosecuting me and ask him whether any other witnesses to this issue.
[01:28:30.200 --> 01:28:34.200]  Yes, sir. I got the prosecutor to understand.
[01:28:34.200 --> 01:28:36.200]  Did you question those witnesses?
[01:28:36.200 --> 01:28:38.200]  No, I did not.
[01:28:38.200 --> 01:28:40.200]  Well, why didn't you?
[01:28:40.200 --> 01:28:45.200]  Well, Mr. Kelton, I didn't believe you. Oh, you didn't believe me.
[01:28:45.200 --> 01:28:50.200]  So are you familiar with the American Bar Association standards for the prosecution function?
[01:28:50.200 --> 01:28:55.200]  Yes, Mr. Kelton, I am. Are you familiar with standard 3-3.11?
[01:28:55.200 --> 01:28:58.200]  No, Mr. Kelton, I'm not familiar with every single paragraph.
[01:28:58.200 --> 01:29:02.200]  Well, let me familiarize you with it then.
[01:29:02.200 --> 01:29:08.200]  Because the first question I had asked him, if he was an ethical attorney,
[01:29:08.200 --> 01:29:13.200]  his old ball head turned red and he got real excited and objected to it.
[01:29:13.200 --> 01:29:19.200]  And the judge said, I'll rule that.
[01:29:19.200 --> 01:29:23.200]  Ask another question, Mr. Kelton. I said, OK, judge.
[01:29:23.200 --> 01:29:26.200]  He said, objection sustained. So I moved ahead.
[01:29:26.200 --> 01:29:34.200]  And then 3-3.11 says, the prosecuting attorney shall not refrain from pursuing evidence
[01:29:34.200 --> 01:29:39.200]  solely because the evidence will show the innocence of the accused or mitigate the guilt of the accused.
[01:29:39.200 --> 01:29:45.200]  Now, do you still consider yourself an... I'm sorry.
[01:29:45.200 --> 01:29:52.200]  It said, it is unethical conduct for a prosecuting attorney to refrain from pursuing evidence
[01:29:52.200 --> 01:29:56.200]  simply because it will show the innocence of the accused or mitigate the guilt of the accused.
[01:29:56.200 --> 01:30:00.200]  Now, do you still consider yourself an...
[01:30:00.200 --> 01:30:06.200]  Sorry, soft drink lovers. Ethan, diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:30:06.200 --> 01:30:11.200]  A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff.
[01:30:11.200 --> 01:30:16.200]  I'm Dr. Kauffman Albright and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:30:16.200 --> 01:30:22.200]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.200 --> 01:30:27.200]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.200 --> 01:30:32.200]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.200 --> 01:30:35.200]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.200 --> 01:30:38.200]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.200 --> 01:30:42.200]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.200 --> 01:30:45.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.200 --> 01:30:51.200]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong.
[01:30:51.200 --> 01:30:56.200]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:56.200 --> 01:31:03.200]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[01:31:03.200 --> 01:31:06.200]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners triggered the appetite,
[01:31:06.200 --> 01:31:10.200]  but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:31:10.200 --> 01:31:16.200]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake.
[01:31:16.200 --> 01:31:19.200]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight,
[01:31:19.200 --> 01:31:24.200]  and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:31:24.200 --> 01:31:29.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:55.200 --> 01:31:58.200]  We are Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.200 --> 01:32:25.200]  Rememberbuilding7.org today.
[01:32:28.200 --> 01:32:31.200]  Rural Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.200 --> 01:32:35.200]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.200 --> 01:32:39.200]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuralLawRadio.com
[01:32:39.200 --> 01:32:41.200]  and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.200 --> 01:32:44.200]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:44.200 --> 01:32:48.200]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:48.200 --> 01:32:51.200]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.200 --> 01:32:55.200]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuralLawRadio.com.
[01:32:55.200 --> 01:33:02.200]  With this copy today and together, we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:02.200 --> 01:33:29.200]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:32.200 --> 01:33:48.200]  The way you're done with temptation, they're trying to buy the whole place.
[01:33:48.200 --> 01:33:59.200]  They want a voice in the nation because they're falling from grace.
[01:33:59.200 --> 01:34:07.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, the Rural Law Radio.
[01:34:07.200 --> 01:34:12.200]  And we're talking to Scott and Mishka. Okay, Scott.
[01:34:12.200 --> 01:34:15.200]  Ridham and Damos.
[01:34:15.200 --> 01:34:19.200]  Or at some states, they call it a ridham mandate.
[01:34:19.200 --> 01:34:25.200]  They're asking the higher court to order a lower court to do something they're required to do.
[01:34:25.200 --> 01:34:31.200]  This will really black his eye.
[01:34:31.200 --> 01:34:39.200]  Yes, but in a way that's cordial enough because, you know, I mean, it's not a judicial conduct complaint, you know.
[01:34:39.200 --> 01:34:45.200]  Right. It's just him having to answer to the appellate court right off the bat.
[01:34:45.200 --> 01:34:49.200]  You're letting him know you're going to have to work for this one.
[01:34:49.200 --> 01:34:57.200]  And the worst thing for you to do is to always be polite, always be cordial.
[01:34:57.200 --> 01:35:02.200]  Even when you're hammering them big time.
[01:35:02.200 --> 01:35:08.200]  When I'm hammering prosecutors and police, I joke with them all the time.
[01:35:08.200 --> 01:35:13.200]  Make them crazy.
[01:35:13.200 --> 01:35:18.200]  They think that because we're in a fight, we're supposed to get real serious.
[01:35:18.200 --> 01:35:25.200]  And the best thing I did, the best results I've had is when I don't get serious in court.
[01:35:25.200 --> 01:35:32.200]  Like that judge in Conroe, when I told him that I'd sleep well at night and keep my hands in my own pockets.
[01:35:32.200 --> 01:35:36.200]  When I said that to him, he was taken aback.
[01:35:36.200 --> 01:35:45.200]  He just wasn't used to somebody cracking jokes in court.
[01:35:45.200 --> 01:35:49.200]  Who doesn't get intimidated?
[01:35:49.200 --> 01:35:51.200]  What's this guy know that I don't know?
[01:35:51.200 --> 01:35:58.200]  Okay. So you want, you got what you need, you got the direction?
[01:35:58.200 --> 01:36:12.200]  I do. I just was going to ask you about, would you have any moral or ethical objections to bar grieving and intern?
[01:36:12.200 --> 01:36:25.200]  Well, to send a new recruit to be my prosecutor.
[01:36:25.200 --> 01:36:31.200]  They always give the young lawyers to the prosecutor.
[01:36:31.200 --> 01:36:42.200]  Oh, yeah, I've been in that spot where I didn't bar grieve the lawyer in South Lake.
[01:36:42.200 --> 01:36:45.200]  It was her first day on the job.
[01:36:45.200 --> 01:36:51.200]  But I did file 58 felony complaints against her.
[01:36:51.200 --> 01:36:53.200]  Well, I knew they wouldn't go anywhere.
[01:36:53.200 --> 01:36:56.200]  But if I had a bar grieve, does that have really hurt her?
[01:36:56.200 --> 01:36:58.200]  And she had no idea.
[01:36:58.200 --> 01:37:01.200]  She's just doing what she's taught. She had no idea what she's doing wrong.
[01:37:01.200 --> 01:37:04.200]  So I appreciate your concern.
[01:37:04.200 --> 01:37:10.200]  So I suggest you bar grieve her boss or his boss.
[01:37:10.200 --> 01:37:18.200]  Yes, I could also fire a warning shot across the bow by bar grieving the city prosecutor.
[01:37:18.200 --> 01:37:22.200]  Remember, I have one of each in this case, one city charge, one county charge.
[01:37:22.200 --> 01:37:25.200]  So I have one prosecutor from each office.
[01:37:25.200 --> 01:37:31.200]  Yeah, you bar grieve any one of them and that'll send a shot across their bow.
[01:37:31.200 --> 01:37:35.200]  And that'll terrify this new prosecutor.
[01:37:35.200 --> 01:37:39.200]  He was pretty wide eyed. That's why I would feel horrible about bar grieving him
[01:37:39.200 --> 01:37:47.200]  and never be able to get malpractice insurance and yada yada yada.
[01:37:47.200 --> 01:37:50.200]  So to bar grieve his boss.
[01:37:50.200 --> 01:37:54.200]  Right, right. Do the old respond to that superior, right?
[01:37:54.200 --> 01:37:59.200]  Yeah, this is what you get for putting this kid in that position.
[01:37:59.200 --> 01:38:02.200]  Right.
[01:38:02.200 --> 01:38:06.200]  That would be much more elegant.
[01:38:06.200 --> 01:38:14.200]  And the judge will know you bar grieve the boss to keep from damaging the young lawyer.
[01:38:14.200 --> 01:38:19.200]  Because they really work with those lawyers to bring them along.
[01:38:19.200 --> 01:38:24.200]  And Court Watson, this young lawyer, gives me a stack of discovery.
[01:38:24.200 --> 01:38:32.200]  This is before we had email and he went down to the library
[01:38:32.200 --> 01:38:35.200]  and they had these special copiers where you could have a sharp corner
[01:38:35.200 --> 01:38:38.200]  where you could set a book on it and copy a page.
[01:38:38.200 --> 01:38:44.200]  Well, to save some paper, he shrunk it and copied two pages on one
[01:38:44.200 --> 01:38:50.200]  and had a big stack of stuff, gave me one and then took one up
[01:38:50.200 --> 01:38:54.200]  and put it on the judge's bench.
[01:38:54.200 --> 01:39:01.200]  I looked at it and I said, Your Honor, does the court have a magnifying glass?
[01:39:01.200 --> 01:39:03.200]  And this judge hated me.
[01:39:03.200 --> 01:39:08.200]  But he just died recently and I had first degree felony charges against him.
[01:39:08.200 --> 01:39:13.200]  But he looked down, you know, he looked at me a second and I'm holding this discovery.
[01:39:13.200 --> 01:39:16.200]  And then, or this case law, this guy gave me.
[01:39:16.200 --> 01:39:20.200]  And he reaches over and picks up what the lawyer put on his desk
[01:39:20.200 --> 01:39:24.200]  and he looked at it, he took it by the corner and flung it.
[01:39:24.200 --> 01:39:28.200]  And it was snowing papers in the court.
[01:39:28.200 --> 01:39:32.200]  And he was crawling down this lawyer's throat.
[01:39:32.200 --> 01:39:35.200]  What's the matter with you? You trying to blind me?
[01:39:35.200 --> 01:39:37.200]  Just reaming him.
[01:39:37.200 --> 01:39:40.200]  The kids were running around picking up papers.
[01:39:40.200 --> 01:39:44.200]  I kind of grinned at him and I looked up at the judge and I kind of nodded at him.
[01:39:44.200 --> 01:39:49.200]  He looked at me and gave me a little conspiratorial grin and nodded back.
[01:39:49.200 --> 01:39:54.200]  And I was telling him, Yeah, I know you're just teaching him, you're not really PO'd at him.
[01:39:54.200 --> 01:39:56.200]  And he's kind of give me that nod.
[01:39:56.200 --> 01:39:59.200]  Yeah, I appreciate that you know that.
[01:39:59.200 --> 01:40:01.200]  But yeah, they bring these lawyers along.
[01:40:01.200 --> 01:40:07.200]  They're all essentially have their snouts in the same trough.
[01:40:07.200 --> 01:40:14.200]  And if you hammer his boss and not him, that will get you a lot of respect.
[01:40:14.200 --> 01:40:17.200]  That's brilliant. That's brilliant because what I can do is I can,
[01:40:17.200 --> 01:40:22.200]  I can bar grieve the assistant to the attorney direct, the one that's on my case.
[01:40:22.200 --> 01:40:29.200]  But then on the other side, I can make the point of jumping over the intern and going after the boss.
[01:40:29.200 --> 01:40:35.200]  And that, you're right. That will, that will buy me a ton of respect.
[01:40:35.200 --> 01:40:37.200]  Yeah.
[01:40:37.200 --> 01:40:40.200]  That's great. That's what I'll do.
[01:40:40.200 --> 01:40:42.200]  Okay. How fun.
[01:40:42.200 --> 01:40:48.200]  All right. I did directions for the mandamus in the court rules or what?
[01:40:48.200 --> 01:40:52.200]  Yeah, just look up rules of pellet procedure.
[01:40:52.200 --> 01:40:54.200]  I'm not sure which it'd be. Brett, do you know which one?
[01:40:54.200 --> 01:40:58.200]  Just rules of civil procedure or a pellet?
[01:40:58.200 --> 01:40:59.200]  To do which?
[01:40:59.200 --> 01:41:04.200]  Mandamus. The mandamus goes to the appellate court, but it's not really a straight up appeal.
[01:41:04.200 --> 01:41:09.200]  I would check both. I bet it's going to be in the appellate court rules.
[01:41:09.200 --> 01:41:13.200]  Okay. Okay. That's why I haven't seen it. That's where it is. I haven't checked that.
[01:41:13.200 --> 01:41:15.200]  That's probably where it is.
[01:41:15.200 --> 01:41:16.200]  Okay.
[01:41:16.200 --> 01:41:18.200]  I'm sparring the capital.
[01:41:18.200 --> 01:41:23.200]  I'll be thinking to you guys the whole time.
[01:41:23.200 --> 01:41:25.200]  Okay. Thank you, Scott.
[01:41:25.200 --> 01:41:26.200]  Thanks, guys.
[01:41:26.200 --> 01:41:29.200]  Now we're going to EJ in California.
[01:41:29.200 --> 01:41:37.200]  Hello, EJ. What? EJ is not your name. That's what's on our computer.
[01:41:37.200 --> 01:41:40.200]  What do you want me to call you?
[01:41:40.200 --> 01:41:42.200]  EJ.
[01:41:42.200 --> 01:41:48.200]  What? You mean I screwed up?
[01:41:48.200 --> 01:41:52.200]  No, you just thought you screwed up.
[01:41:52.200 --> 01:41:57.200]  The mistake was that you thought it was a mistake.
[01:41:57.200 --> 01:42:03.200]  Hello, EJ. We've got someone that comes up with their initials out of California,
[01:42:03.200 --> 01:42:06.200]  but it's a different name and I always screwed that up.
[01:42:06.200 --> 01:42:11.200]  I wouldn't have screwed it up, but I screwed it up and I forget about it.
[01:42:11.200 --> 01:42:14.200]  What can we do for you, EJ?
[01:42:14.200 --> 01:42:19.200]  It's good, but no one can pronounce it, so I just say EJ.
[01:42:19.200 --> 01:42:22.200]  Okay.
[01:42:22.200 --> 01:42:27.200]  Hello, okay. I called in last week and I have my...
[01:42:27.200 --> 01:42:32.200]  I'm kind of going to collect this, but I'm going to push forward.
[01:42:32.200 --> 01:42:37.200]  The public record is I'm asking for everything, which is body cam,
[01:42:37.200 --> 01:42:40.200]  which they don't have, but I'm going to ask you for anyway.
[01:42:40.200 --> 01:42:46.200]  Audio cam is for the police who made the report
[01:42:46.200 --> 01:42:53.200]  for the accuser thing that I punched him in the face at the hospital.
[01:42:53.200 --> 01:42:58.200]  I posted that on Telegram, but no one really replied.
[01:42:58.200 --> 01:43:08.200]  And so from here, I just asked for any emails, body cam, audio cam,
[01:43:08.200 --> 01:43:14.200]  and what's the fourth one, and that was what I wrote in Telegram.
[01:43:14.200 --> 01:43:18.200]  Wait, wait. Did the hospital have security cameras?
[01:43:18.200 --> 01:43:23.200]  Oh, wow. Yes, they did. In the lobby.
[01:43:23.200 --> 01:43:28.200]  Sure, they did. In the ER lobby, yes.
[01:43:28.200 --> 01:43:33.200]  You definitely need to ask for those, and hope it's not too late.
[01:43:33.200 --> 01:43:37.200]  Yeah.
[01:43:37.200 --> 01:43:42.200]  I even see the police just put it in there for hospital surveillance.
[01:43:42.200 --> 01:43:46.200]  You had to actually look it up because the detective called me,
[01:43:46.200 --> 01:43:53.200]  and she said she viewed the hospital surveillance.
[01:43:53.200 --> 01:43:55.200]  Wait, I missed that.
[01:43:55.200 --> 01:43:59.200]  Oh, we're going to have to check on that after the sponsors.
[01:43:59.200 --> 01:44:00.200]  Okay.
[01:44:00.200 --> 01:44:04.200]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[01:44:04.200 --> 01:44:06.200]  except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.200 --> 01:44:09.200]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves,
[01:44:09.200 --> 01:44:12.200]  and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:12.200 --> 01:44:16.200]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[01:44:16.200 --> 01:44:18.200]  is good nutrition.
[01:44:18.200 --> 01:44:22.200]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated and mutilated,
[01:44:22.200 --> 01:44:26.200]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:26.200 --> 01:44:30.200]  Logo Serrillion Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[01:44:30.200 --> 01:44:32.200]  most of which we reject.
[01:44:32.200 --> 01:44:35.200]  We have come to trust Jevity so much.
[01:44:35.200 --> 01:44:40.200]  We have a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others.
[01:44:40.200 --> 01:44:43.200]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[01:44:43.200 --> 01:44:48.200]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:48.200 --> 01:44:52.200]  As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:52.200 --> 01:44:55.200]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:44:55.200 --> 01:44:59.200]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:59.200 --> 01:45:01.200]  Order now.
[01:45:01.200 --> 01:45:04.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.200 --> 01:45:07.200]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.200 --> 01:45:11.200]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course
[01:45:11.200 --> 01:45:15.200]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.200 --> 01:45:19.200]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.200 --> 01:45:23.200]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.200 --> 01:45:26.200]  Thousands have won with our step by step course,
[01:45:26.200 --> 01:45:28.200]  and now you can too.
[01:45:28.200 --> 01:45:31.200]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.200 --> 01:45:34.200]  with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.200 --> 01:45:36.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:36.200 --> 01:45:39.200]  you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.200 --> 01:45:43.200]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.200 --> 01:45:45.200]  You'll receive our audio classroom,
[01:45:45.200 --> 01:45:49.200]  video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.200 --> 01:45:52.200]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.200 --> 01:45:55.200]  Please visit LulevLawRadio.com
[01:45:55.200 --> 01:45:57.200]  and click on the banner.
[01:45:57.200 --> 01:46:01.200]  It's toll free, 866-LAW-EASY.
[01:46:27.200 --> 01:46:33.200]  All right, we are back.
[01:46:33.200 --> 01:46:35.200]  LulevLaw Radio, Randy Kelton.
[01:46:35.200 --> 01:46:38.200]  I'm Brad Fountain, and we are talking this evening
[01:46:38.200 --> 01:46:41.200]  with EJ in California.
[01:46:41.200 --> 01:46:46.200]  And EJ, we were just talking about how you can get these videos,
[01:46:46.200 --> 01:46:51.200]  the security videos from the hospital, right?
[01:46:51.200 --> 01:46:53.200]  Yes, correct.
[01:46:53.200 --> 01:46:59.200]  This is actually back in December.
[01:46:59.200 --> 01:47:03.200]  I did send a, what you call it,
[01:47:03.200 --> 01:47:06.200]  like a peanut to the hospital.
[01:47:06.200 --> 01:47:08.200]  Okay.
[01:47:08.200 --> 01:47:12.200]  And of course the mega law firm that they hired,
[01:47:12.200 --> 01:47:14.200]  they scared me.
[01:47:14.200 --> 01:47:20.200]  They sent me saying that they cannot...
[01:47:20.200 --> 01:47:23.200]  A motion to quash that, Sabina?
[01:47:23.200 --> 01:47:25.200]  Correct.
[01:47:25.200 --> 01:47:31.200]  And the judge, he said, yeah, he's going to say yes.
[01:47:31.200 --> 01:47:34.200]  He said yes.
[01:47:34.200 --> 01:47:37.200]  He allowed it.
[01:47:37.200 --> 01:47:38.200]  Okay.
[01:47:38.200 --> 01:47:42.200]  Yes, to allow the quashing so you didn't get your videos.
[01:47:42.200 --> 01:47:44.200]  Correct.
[01:47:44.200 --> 01:47:46.200]  Okay, wait, wait, let me get this right.
[01:47:46.200 --> 01:47:50.200]  They asked for the hospital's videos?
[01:47:50.200 --> 01:47:52.200]  Yes, correct.
[01:47:52.200 --> 01:47:53.200]  Okay, okay.
[01:47:53.200 --> 01:47:57.200]  Once you've asked for them, they're put on notice.
[01:47:57.200 --> 01:48:03.200]  So they can't delete these videos until this case is over.
[01:48:03.200 --> 01:48:05.200]  Thank you very much.
[01:48:05.200 --> 01:48:06.200]  Until the case is over?
[01:48:06.200 --> 01:48:07.200]  Yeah.
[01:48:07.200 --> 01:48:10.200]  Or the judge says that the subpoena is quashed?
[01:48:10.200 --> 01:48:12.200]  No, no, until the case is over because you can...
[01:48:12.200 --> 01:48:17.200]  If your trial is over, you can appeal that ruling and overturn it.
[01:48:17.200 --> 01:48:20.200]  So once they have knowledge you're seeking these,
[01:48:20.200 --> 01:48:22.200]  they can no longer delete them.
[01:48:22.200 --> 01:48:24.200]  So they should still be available.
[01:48:24.200 --> 01:48:26.200]  Beautiful.
[01:48:26.200 --> 01:48:28.200]  Beautiful.
[01:48:28.200 --> 01:48:31.200]  That's why I get the big bucks.
[01:48:31.200 --> 01:48:35.200]  Sorry, no, I would love to go to here.
[01:48:35.200 --> 01:48:38.200]  I live in California, so I can't drive to Texas.
[01:48:38.200 --> 01:48:42.200]  Hopefully you'll be over here in the West Coast.
[01:48:42.200 --> 01:48:48.200]  Tina and I can see you in your workshop.
[01:48:48.200 --> 01:48:52.200]  So, yeah, I did, but the judge, of course,
[01:48:52.200 --> 01:48:57.200]  will side with the law firm in the hospital.
[01:48:57.200 --> 01:49:04.200]  So the thing is, it's been dismissed, okay,
[01:49:04.200 --> 01:49:13.200]  saying that the security guard decided not to prosecute this case.
[01:49:13.200 --> 01:49:15.200]  So that's why they just...
[01:49:15.200 --> 01:49:17.200]  It was dismissed.
[01:49:17.200 --> 01:49:20.200]  If some kind of law is called...
[01:49:20.200 --> 01:49:22.200]  What was the law called?
[01:49:22.200 --> 01:49:34.200]  Marston Law in California.
[01:49:34.200 --> 01:49:37.200]  Are you there?
[01:49:37.200 --> 01:49:39.200]  Yeah, I'm not familiar with Marston Law.
[01:49:39.200 --> 01:49:43.200]  Will you tell us what that says?
[01:49:43.200 --> 01:49:47.200]  Okay, so...
[01:49:47.200 --> 01:49:51.200]  Just basically.
[01:49:51.200 --> 01:49:58.200]  They just double-checked before they dismissed the case.
[01:49:58.200 --> 01:50:00.200]  Here we go.
[01:50:00.200 --> 01:50:04.200]  Hearing to fire Marston Law.
[01:50:04.200 --> 01:50:06.200]  Court or point of attorney?
[01:50:06.200 --> 01:50:12.200]  Oh, that was the motion that I tried to fire the court or court attorney.
[01:50:12.200 --> 01:50:18.200]  I need to get that for you while we talk or call back.
[01:50:18.200 --> 01:50:22.200]  I need to bring that document up.
[01:50:22.200 --> 01:50:24.200]  It's a Marston motion.
[01:50:24.200 --> 01:50:26.200]  Because they put a court or point of attorney.
[01:50:26.200 --> 01:50:34.200]  By the way, this case has been dismissed, so...
[01:50:34.200 --> 01:50:39.200]  The case against you has been dismissed?
[01:50:39.200 --> 01:50:41.200]  Yeah.
[01:50:41.200 --> 01:50:48.200]  Is there any prosecution still ongoing?
[01:50:48.200 --> 01:50:50.200]  No.
[01:50:50.200 --> 01:50:56.200]  Okay, now you're looking to file suit?
[01:50:56.200 --> 01:50:59.200]  Yeah, correct.
[01:50:59.200 --> 01:51:01.200]  Okay.
[01:51:01.200 --> 01:51:06.200]  Okay, I looked up Marston Law, Marston Law.
[01:51:06.200 --> 01:51:09.200]  I'm not finding anything in California.
[01:51:09.200 --> 01:51:11.200]  Still there?
[01:51:11.200 --> 01:51:13.200]  I found it.
[01:51:13.200 --> 01:51:15.200]  Let's see.
[01:51:15.200 --> 01:51:17.200]  So, it is called...
[01:51:17.200 --> 01:51:20.200]  A typical procedure, one, two, three, four...
[01:51:20.200 --> 01:51:22.200]  Oh, Marston Law.
[01:51:22.200 --> 01:51:25.200]  N-A-R-S-Y-S.
[01:51:25.200 --> 01:51:28.200]  That's been compiled with motion granted.
[01:51:28.200 --> 01:51:30.200]  Case dismissed.
[01:51:30.200 --> 01:51:31.200]  Marston Law.
[01:51:31.200 --> 01:51:37.200]  N-A-R-S-Y.
[01:51:37.200 --> 01:51:40.200]  N-A-R-S-T-I-S.
[01:51:40.200 --> 01:51:41.200]  No, just...
[01:51:41.200 --> 01:51:42.200]  No, I got it.
[01:51:42.200 --> 01:51:43.200]  No, I got it.
[01:51:43.200 --> 01:51:45.200]  N-A-R-T-I-S Law, got it.
[01:51:45.200 --> 01:51:46.200]  No.
[01:51:46.200 --> 01:51:48.200]  N-A-R-S-Y.
[01:51:48.200 --> 01:51:50.200]  That's it.
[01:51:50.200 --> 01:51:53.200]  Oh, Marcy, okay.
[01:51:53.200 --> 01:51:54.200]  Uh-huh.
[01:51:54.200 --> 01:51:56.200]  Marston Law.
[01:51:56.200 --> 01:52:02.200]  N-A-R-S-Y.
[01:52:02.200 --> 01:52:07.200]  N-A-R-S-Y-S Law, Office of Victim and Supervisor of Rights.
[01:52:07.200 --> 01:52:12.200]  California approved Proposition 9, the Victim's Bill of Rights.
[01:52:12.200 --> 01:52:18.200]  And Marston's Law, this measure amended California Constitution to provide additional rights to victims.
[01:52:18.200 --> 01:52:24.200]  This card contains specific sections of the Victim's Bill of Rights and Resources.
[01:52:24.200 --> 01:52:28.200]  Crime victims may obtain additional information recording.
[01:52:28.200 --> 01:52:35.200]  Most of the alleged victims dismissed the case, so there is no victim.
[01:52:35.200 --> 01:52:40.200]  Who would be the victim here?
[01:52:40.200 --> 01:52:46.200]  The security guard, male security guard.
[01:52:46.200 --> 01:52:50.200]  Was he physically injured?
[01:52:50.200 --> 01:52:54.200]  He said I punched him in the face, which I did not.
[01:52:54.200 --> 01:52:55.200]  Okay, so what?
[01:52:55.200 --> 01:52:57.200]  Was he injured?
[01:52:57.200 --> 01:52:59.200]  Yeah.
[01:52:59.200 --> 01:53:06.200]  Um, that I don't know because the police, the city police, uh, said they could not provide me with police report.
[01:53:06.200 --> 01:53:07.200]  And, um...
[01:53:07.200 --> 01:53:09.200]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:53:09.200 --> 01:53:12.200]  This case has been dismissed?
[01:53:12.200 --> 01:53:13.200]  Yeah.
[01:53:13.200 --> 01:53:15.200]  It's public record now.
[01:53:15.200 --> 01:53:16.200]  Wide open.
[01:53:16.200 --> 01:53:18.200]  Oh, wide open.
[01:53:18.200 --> 01:53:19.200]  Right, right.
[01:53:19.200 --> 01:53:20.200]  Yeah, now that it's dismissed.
[01:53:20.200 --> 01:53:26.200]  But see, if he's not injured, then no harm, no foul.
[01:53:26.200 --> 01:53:35.200]  Did you happen to say something or have a look on your face that might have injured his ego?
[01:53:35.200 --> 01:53:36.200]  Yeah.
[01:53:36.200 --> 01:53:38.200]  You got to remember, he is the guy.
[01:53:38.200 --> 01:53:42.200]  And we have delicate egos.
[01:53:42.200 --> 01:53:44.200]  Um...
[01:53:44.200 --> 01:53:45.200]  Yeah.
[01:53:45.200 --> 01:53:52.200]  I can't see how a victim's rights is going to apply to anything here.
[01:53:52.200 --> 01:53:55.200]  A victim has to be injured.
[01:53:55.200 --> 01:53:57.200]  Wow.
[01:53:57.200 --> 01:53:59.200]  He said he...
[01:53:59.200 --> 01:54:05.200]  Well, the, you know, the police lies also and they came out and they said, oh, yeah, you punched him in the face.
[01:54:05.200 --> 01:54:07.200]  Um, take out your hand.
[01:54:07.200 --> 01:54:12.200]  So, um, they took a photo of the front and back of my hand.
[01:54:12.200 --> 01:54:14.200]  Um, now I know what to do.
[01:54:14.200 --> 01:54:17.200]  I shouldn't have allowed that.
[01:54:17.200 --> 01:54:18.200]  And secondly, they have...
[01:54:18.200 --> 01:54:21.200]  Oh, yeah, we have witnesses restifying that.
[01:54:21.200 --> 01:54:22.200]  Okay.
[01:54:22.200 --> 01:54:26.200]  At the end of the day, at the end of the day, it makes no difference.
[01:54:26.200 --> 01:54:28.200]  It makes no difference if he has a claim.
[01:54:28.200 --> 01:54:34.200]  If he's making this claim so he can keep you from making a claim against him, screw that.
[01:54:34.200 --> 01:54:36.200]  It's not about that.
[01:54:36.200 --> 01:54:39.200]  It's not about whether he has a counterclaim.
[01:54:39.200 --> 01:54:46.200]  It's about how much it's going to cost them to defend a suit that you file against them.
[01:54:46.200 --> 01:54:48.200]  That's what it's about.
[01:54:48.200 --> 01:54:49.200]  Right.
[01:54:49.200 --> 01:54:50.200]  Right.
[01:54:50.200 --> 01:54:56.200]  It's going to cost them a lot of money.
[01:54:56.200 --> 01:55:07.200]  If they had anything they could get you convicted on, they would have done so to keep you from having a shot at suing them for their bad behavior.
[01:55:07.200 --> 01:55:09.200]  But they didn't.
[01:55:09.200 --> 01:55:15.200]  The last thing they wanted to happen was not guilty.
[01:55:15.200 --> 01:55:21.200]  So they dismissed it before getting a not guilty ruling.
[01:55:21.200 --> 01:55:24.200]  So now they're trying to keep you from suing them.
[01:55:24.200 --> 01:55:27.200]  You don't care what claims they got against you.
[01:55:27.200 --> 01:55:28.200]  You sue them.
[01:55:28.200 --> 01:55:31.200]  It's going to cost them a fortune in lawyer fees.
[01:55:31.200 --> 01:55:32.200]  Okay.
[01:55:32.200 --> 01:55:33.200]  Yep.
[01:55:33.200 --> 01:55:39.200]  And their bond carrier will write you a check just to get you to go away.
[01:55:39.200 --> 01:55:44.200]  Got it.
[01:55:44.200 --> 01:55:52.200]  So my first pursuit is to get all the records from the police, everything that I can.
[01:55:52.200 --> 01:55:53.200]  Okay.
[01:55:53.200 --> 01:55:58.200]  And I don't think the police can get the hospital surveillance, but that'd be still public record.
[01:55:58.200 --> 01:56:02.200]  Probably not because that is considered HIPAA, right?
[01:56:02.200 --> 01:56:10.200]  Because there were people in the lobby waiting in the lobby.
[01:56:10.200 --> 01:56:19.200]  And just to let you answer to Brett's question, bruising someone's ego, this is a hospital.
[01:56:19.200 --> 01:56:20.200]  Okay.
[01:56:20.200 --> 01:56:25.200]  I'm here to see my mom after 11 p.m. and you're prohibiting me.
[01:56:25.200 --> 01:56:26.200]  Why?
[01:56:26.200 --> 01:56:28.200]  I don't understand.
[01:56:28.200 --> 01:56:30.200]  I've been coming to this hospital.
[01:56:30.200 --> 01:56:41.200]  So when I say things like that, and I'm bruising your ego, and then you lie about a family member punching someone,
[01:56:41.200 --> 01:56:52.200]  physically punching, this is really, I mean, and then, you know, my mom passed, you know?
[01:56:52.200 --> 01:57:02.200]  So I do need to move forward a little bit slow because, you know, I don't want to say this very publicly,
[01:57:02.200 --> 01:57:08.200]  but I do need to let people know.
[01:57:08.200 --> 01:57:14.200]  The security people at the hospital, they are, how would you say?
[01:57:14.200 --> 01:57:21.200]  I know they have to be very careful about who they let people in to see their loved ones.
[01:57:21.200 --> 01:57:26.200]  But still, you don't lie about that, you know?
[01:57:26.200 --> 01:57:36.200]  Did you file professional conduct complaints against the nurses and doctors of the American Medical Association?
[01:57:36.200 --> 01:57:41.200]  So that needs to be my next to-do list.
[01:57:41.200 --> 01:57:45.200]  That really gets their attention.
[01:57:45.200 --> 01:57:46.200]  Okay.
[01:57:46.200 --> 01:57:52.200]  They work in this field too long, and they've lost their compassion, maybe you'll help them get some back.
[01:57:52.200 --> 01:57:56.200]  Okay.
[01:57:56.200 --> 01:58:01.200]  So you said medical, was it nurses?
[01:58:01.200 --> 01:58:08.200]  The American Medical Association has to approve their licenses, and whatever office approves their licenses,
[01:58:08.200 --> 01:58:15.200]  you write a complaint against their license claiming that they're improperly trained.
[01:58:15.200 --> 01:58:18.200]  And even-
[01:58:18.200 --> 01:58:22.200]  That'll sting them good.
[01:58:22.200 --> 01:58:23.200]  Okay.
[01:58:23.200 --> 01:58:29.200]  I did talk to the administrator, her name is Ashton,
[01:58:29.200 --> 01:58:41.200]  and she did let me know that their policy is not to take someone's, you know,
[01:58:41.200 --> 01:58:50.200]  possession of a patient, you know, the family.
[01:58:50.200 --> 01:58:54.200]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[01:58:54.200 --> 01:58:58.200]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.200 --> 01:59:02.200]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:02.200 --> 01:59:07.200]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:07.200 --> 01:59:13.200]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.200 --> 01:59:18.200]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.200 --> 01:59:22.200]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:22.200 --> 01:59:28.200]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.200 --> 01:59:33.200]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.200 --> 01:59:43.200]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.200 --> 02:00:04.200]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.