ROL_2021-06-28_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.560]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdowns.
[00:06.560 --> 00:13.080]  Markets for Monday, 7 January 2018 Open with precious metals, gold $1,288.65 an
[00:13.080 --> 00:21.360]  ounce, silver $15.70 an ounce, copper $2.63 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $47.96 a barrel,
[00:21.360 --> 00:28.800]  Brent crude $57.06 a barrel, cryptos and order of market cap, Bitcoin $4,029.64, Ethereum
[00:28.800 --> 00:36.840]  $153.07, Ripple XRP $0.36 and Bitcoin Cash $162.06 a crypto coin.
[00:36.840 --> 00:45.160]  Today in History, the year 1985, the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency launches the Saki
[00:45.160 --> 00:50.480]  Kaki, Japan's first interplanetary spacecraft, becoming the first deep space probe to be
[00:50.480 --> 00:55.000]  launched by any country other than the United States or the Soviet Union.
[00:55.000 --> 01:02.880]  In recent news, Christopher DeVilla, the father of a missing baby, is behind bars for a child
[01:02.880 --> 01:07.240]  endangerment charge for parking his car at a San Antonio gas station last Friday night
[01:07.240 --> 01:10.080]  with his eight-month-old son in the back seat.
[01:10.080 --> 01:13.640]  The unfortunate circumstances were that he left the car running and unlocked.
[01:13.640 --> 01:17.720]  Surveillance videos showed a woman approaching the car, getting inside and driving off.
[01:17.720 --> 01:22.320]  KABB reported that police later found DeVilla's car at a nearby park, but Baby J and the car
[01:22.320 --> 01:23.960]  keys were no longer inside.
[01:23.960 --> 01:27.720]  Investigators believe that the occurrence wasn't a random kidnapping and suspect that
[01:27.720 --> 01:30.200]  DeVilla knew the woman in the video.
[01:30.200 --> 01:33.680]  Apparently, DeVilla's family has not been cooperating with the police either, however
[01:33.680 --> 01:35.840]  both parents are disputing those claims.
[01:35.840 --> 01:44.520]  Police are urging anyone with information about the case to call 911 or 201-207-76-5.
[01:44.520 --> 01:49.000]  The Bernie Sanders campaign did not adequately address incidents of sexual harassment, sexism
[01:49.000 --> 01:52.800]  treatment and paid disparities between men and women according to some allegations from
[01:52.800 --> 01:56.480]  multiple women who worked on his 2016 presidential bid.
[01:56.480 --> 01:59.800]  These allegations came out last Wednesday at the New York Times.
[01:59.800 --> 02:03.840]  Sanders apologizing on CNN said that, quote, I am not going to sit here and tell you that
[02:03.840 --> 02:08.120]  we did everything right in terms of human resources, in terms of addressing the needs
[02:08.120 --> 02:10.400]  that I'm hearing from now.
[02:10.400 --> 02:15.680]  Pope Francis I, speaking to diplomats in an annual speech known informally as the State
[02:15.680 --> 02:19.520]  of the World, stated that the international community is, quote, experiencing a period
[02:19.520 --> 02:23.040]  of difficulty with the re-emergence of nationalistic tendencies.
[02:23.040 --> 02:26.680]  The reappearance of these impulses today is progressively weakening the multilateral
[02:26.680 --> 02:29.440]  system concerning the international migrant problem.
[02:29.440 --> 02:33.680]  He stated that, quote, I do not believe that partial solutions can exist for so universal
[02:33.680 --> 02:38.400]  an issue and called for, quote, rethinking our relationship with our planet when addressing
[02:38.400 --> 02:43.080]  global warming and even touched upon the sexual abuse of children saying that it was, quote,
[02:43.080 --> 02:47.320]  one of the plagues of our time, mentioning that a meeting of key bishops at the Vatican
[02:47.320 --> 02:52.520]  in February would aim to, quote, shed full light on the facts and to alleviate the wounds
[02:52.520 --> 02:54.520]  caused by such crimes.
[02:54.520 --> 03:23.520]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for January 7th, 2019.
[03:23.520 --> 03:45.940]  A
[03:45.940 --> 03:50.100]  me up and stopping me, confiscating my property, talking in my demography, making the poor
[03:50.100 --> 03:55.100]  commodity, profiting off a polity, in poor topology, supporting prison economy, yeah,
[03:55.100 --> 03:59.100]  no one makes money when the violence stops, hating brutality is the way to make a criminal
[03:59.100 --> 04:03.100]  crop, blood in the gutter's how to rich, butter they bread at the top, next why this is what
[04:03.100 --> 04:08.300]  happens when you call the cops, this is what happens when you call the cops, this is what
[04:08.300 --> 04:12.820]  happens when you call the cops, this is what happens when you call the cops, you get your
[04:12.820 --> 04:19.820]  rights violated or you all get shot, this is what happens when you call the cops, this
[04:19.820 --> 04:22.820]  is what happens when you call the cops, this is what happens when you call the cops, you
[04:22.820 --> 04:25.820]  get your rights violated or you all get shot, baby.
[04:25.820 --> 04:27.820]  David, what's your origin, what's your origin?
[04:27.820 --> 04:31.820]  I'm up in the system, many things that's why I'm murdering me, they make me, they take me,
[04:31.820 --> 04:35.820]  they trained them to hate me, they're great at it, they hate me, it changes their flavor,
[04:35.820 --> 04:40.820]  hands up, face down, left hook right quick, throw you down, hook you down, pack you with that
[04:40.820 --> 04:44.820]  shit, nice shit, fly them around, see you with your J's on, you'll get sprayed on over
[04:44.820 --> 04:48.820]  skittles where the trades on, all the people saying this is crazy down in Florida, what
[04:48.820 --> 04:51.820]  you saying is you're playing, it's the same in California, they're ganging like they're
[04:51.820 --> 04:55.820]  banging in our Andy down in Georgia, frame you in the case for what you say without a
[04:55.820 --> 04:59.820]  lawyer, storming with no warning, now they're sorting through your residence, storming with
[04:59.820 --> 05:03.820]  no warning, now they're sorting all the evidence, you better just learn to dodge a box, cause
[05:03.820 --> 05:08.820]  this is what happens when you call the cops, this is what happens when you call the cops,
[05:08.820 --> 05:13.820]  say what, this is what happens when you call the cops, this is what happens when you call
[05:13.820 --> 05:18.820]  the cops you get your rights violated or you all get shot, abs, this is what happens when
[05:18.820 --> 05:23.820]  you call the cops, this is what happens when you call, say what, this is what happens when
[05:23.820 --> 05:27.820]  you call the cops, you get your rights violated or you all get shot, we got them.
[05:27.820 --> 05:32.820]  You're the grenades, pull the pen, throw it in the crib, pull them away, there's a homeless
[05:32.820 --> 05:36.820]  guy camping here we're telling the pack, when he gets up and starts leaving, shoot the bum
[05:36.820 --> 05:37.820]  Bum in the back
[05:37.820 --> 05:38.820]  This guy rolled through a stop sign
[05:38.820 --> 05:39.820]  Let's float for sale
[05:39.820 --> 05:40.820]  Get some doctors to rape
[05:40.820 --> 05:42.820]  We'll send him a bill and a mail
[05:42.820 --> 05:44.820]  We got a black man knocking on a white woman's door
[05:44.820 --> 05:47.820]  We're ten shots, point blank, he ain't gonna knock no more
[05:47.820 --> 05:49.820]  Look, the problem's startin' to your academy
[05:49.820 --> 05:52.820]  You could death her indoctrinated with a military mentality
[05:52.820 --> 05:55.820]  We're done with the soldiers and not just the people that battle
[05:55.820 --> 05:57.820]  We're either collateral damage or combat fatality
[05:57.820 --> 06:00.820]  Either way, the reality's that it's not gonna stop
[06:00.820 --> 06:03.820]  Cause this is what happens when you call the cops
[06:03.820 --> 06:05.820]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[06:05.820 --> 06:09.820]  Come on! This is what happens when you call the cops
[06:09.820 --> 06:20.820]  This is what happens
[06:20.820 --> 06:26.820]  this is what happens when you call the cops
[06:56.820 --> 07:00.980]  happens when you call the cops, you get your rights violated or you all get shot
[07:00.980 --> 07:03.460]  I'm sick of people being victimized by criminal cops
[07:03.460 --> 07:06.020]  Psychopathic predators terrorize the neighborhood block
[07:06.020 --> 07:08.580]  They clip with pepper spray, mate, cut tasers and glocks
[07:08.580 --> 07:11.220]  They like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts
[07:11.220 --> 07:13.780]  Forget what you talk, the cops have got a license to kill
[07:13.780 --> 07:16.340]  Witness intimidation means that they can use it, it will
[07:16.340 --> 07:18.980]  Code of silence means that the pigs will never let out a quip
[07:18.980 --> 07:21.540]  And if they go to court, they know the judge will make them a deal
[07:21.540 --> 07:23.220]  For real, that's why they're stopping me
[07:23.220 --> 07:24.420]  Locking me up and stopping me
[07:24.420 --> 07:27.060]  confiscating my property, talking to my demography
[07:27.060 --> 07:29.620]  Making them poor commodity, profiting off of poverty
[07:29.620 --> 07:32.020]  And thought the politics important, prison of kinds
[07:32.020 --> 07:34.500]  Yeah, no one makes money when the pilot stops
[07:34.500 --> 07:37.060]  Hatin' brutality's the way to make a criminal profit
[07:37.060 --> 07:39.700]  Blood in the gutter's how to wish whether they credit the top
[07:39.700 --> 07:42.100]  And that's why this is what happens when you call the cops
[07:42.100 --> 07:45.300]  For real, this is what happens when you call the cops
[07:45.300 --> 07:47.860]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[07:47.860 --> 07:49.940]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[07:49.940 --> 07:52.980]  You get your rights violated or you all get shot
[07:52.980 --> 07:55.540]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[07:55.540 --> 07:58.180]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[07:58.180 --> 08:00.180]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[08:00.180 --> 08:03.940]  You get your rights violated or you all get shot
[08:09.620 --> 08:11.220]  Alright folks, good evening.
[08:11.220 --> 08:12.980]  This is the Monday Night Rule
[08:12.980 --> 08:15.540]  Hang on, there we go
[08:15.540 --> 08:16.820]  Alright, good evening folks.
[08:16.820 --> 08:18.820]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show
[08:18.820 --> 08:19.700]  With your host Eddie Craig.
[08:19.700 --> 08:22.820]  I am sorry for the long wait on the intro there
[08:22.820 --> 08:28.820]  We were having a little technical difficult to get in the audio where I could hear it on this side and know what the expert is going on.
[08:28.820 --> 08:34.820]  Alright, it is June 28th. Let's see.
[08:34.820 --> 08:39.820]  I'm sorry. Yeah. June 28th, 2021.
[08:39.820 --> 08:45.820]  And as of this Thursday night, the Tower of Law classes will be live.
[08:45.820 --> 08:56.820]  Right now on the Logos Radio Network and the ruleoflawradio.com websites, there are signup buttons for the class.
[08:56.820 --> 09:01.820]  You can have up to two or three different ways to subscribe.
[09:01.820 --> 09:06.820]  You can do monthly six months or 12 months, however you want to do it.
[09:06.820 --> 09:12.820]  And there's a 10% discount for six months and a 15% discount for 12 months.
[09:12.820 --> 09:15.820]  So you can subscribe however you want.
[09:15.820 --> 09:18.820]  But those two buttons are up right now on those two sites.
[09:18.820 --> 09:34.820]  And I hope to have it up by the close of business tomorrow or end of day tomorrow on the legal blog at toweroflawtow-lawtow-law.com.
[09:34.820 --> 09:36.820]  Alright, I'm kind of excited about it.
[09:36.820 --> 09:40.820]  So please forgive me for stumbling all over myself here at the beginning of the show.
[09:40.820 --> 09:47.820]  However, there is something I want to read to you from a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that I found today.
[09:47.820 --> 09:53.820]  And I realized after reading it, I had already found it before and I'm integrating it into the new seminar material,
[09:53.820 --> 09:56.820]  but I had forgotten about it to present it on the show.
[09:56.820 --> 10:08.820]  So now I would like to do that and go into what this actually entails for us when it comes to traffic tickets and things of that nature.
[10:08.820 --> 10:18.820]  The case is Alonis versus U.S. Right now, the number that is on it here is 135 Supreme Court 2001.
[10:18.820 --> 10:27.820]  Google Scholar has not updated it with the proper U.S. reference, which is 575 something.
[10:27.820 --> 10:35.820]  But in any case, ELONIS versus U.S. in 2015.
[10:35.820 --> 10:45.820]  This case actually makes reference to three other cases on that deal with the same subject as far as what it's talking about here,
[10:45.820 --> 10:49.820]  which is criminal intent.
[10:49.820 --> 10:59.820]  Now, none of these cases are based specifically on the premise of criminal intent.
[10:59.820 --> 11:05.820]  They say they're actually dealing with crimes that the government is trying to charge other people with,
[11:05.820 --> 11:10.820]  but the government keeps trying to say that criminal intent, because it's not written into the statute,
[11:10.820 --> 11:14.820]  is not a requirement to be asserted and proven at the trial.
[11:14.820 --> 11:17.820]  Well, this is not dicta, folks.
[11:17.820 --> 11:28.820]  This is actually in the opinion and it's relevant to the facts of the opinion so that they cannot say this cannot be applied to any criminal case.
[11:28.820 --> 11:32.820]  So think about this as I read it.
[11:32.820 --> 11:45.820]  Down here in section 2009 of this case, you have the fact that the statute does not specify any required mental state, however,
[11:45.820 --> 11:48.820]  does not mean that none exists.
[11:48.820 --> 11:54.820]  We have repeatedly held, and this is the United States Supreme Court, by the way,
[11:54.820 --> 12:06.820]  we have repeatedly held that mere omission from a criminal enactment of any mention of criminal intent should not be read as dispensing with it.
[12:06.820 --> 12:15.820]  And the case they decided that in was more set versus United States 342 US 246 from 1952.
[12:15.820 --> 12:23.820]  This rule of construction reflects the basic principle that wrongdoing must be conscious to be criminal.
[12:23.820 --> 12:28.820]  And that is at 252 in that same case.
[12:28.820 --> 12:38.820]  As Justice Jackson explained, the principle is as universal and persistent in mature systems of law as belief in freedom of the human will
[12:38.820 --> 12:46.820]  and a consequent ability and duty of the normal individual to choose between good and evil.
[12:46.820 --> 12:49.820]  And that is the same case at 250.
[12:49.820 --> 12:58.820]  The central thought is that a defendant must be blame worthy in mind before he can be found guilty.
[12:58.820 --> 13:10.820]  A concept courts have expressed over time through various terms such as mensria, sianter, malice of forethought, guilty knowledge, and the like.
[13:10.820 --> 13:15.820]  Again, same case, more set versus United States at 252.
[13:15.820 --> 13:28.820]  Substantive criminal law at section 5.1 pages 332-333, 2nd edition 2003 is where that's listed.
[13:28.820 --> 13:38.820]  Although there are exceptions, the general rule is that guilty mind is a necessary element in the indictment and proof of every crime,
[13:38.820 --> 13:44.820]  United States versus blint, 258 US 250 in 1922.
[13:44.820 --> 13:52.820]  We therefore generally interpret criminal statutes to include broadly applicable sianter requirements,
[13:52.820 --> 13:57.820]  even where the statutes by its terms does not contain them.
[13:57.820 --> 14:04.820]  United States versus Excitement Video Inc. 513 US 64 1994.
[14:04.820 --> 14:11.820]  This is not to say that a defendant must know that his conduct is illegal before he may be found guilty.
[14:11.820 --> 14:16.820]  This familiar maximum ignorance of the law is no excuse, typically holds true.
[14:16.820 --> 14:26.820]  Instead, our cases have explained that a defendant generally must know the facts that make his conduct fit the definition of the offense.
[14:26.820 --> 14:33.820]  And that's in Staples versus United States 511 US 600 in 1994 as well.
[14:33.820 --> 14:41.820]  Even if he does not know that those facts give rise to a crime.
[14:41.820 --> 14:49.820]  Okay, so how does this affect Texas transportation code cases?
[14:49.820 --> 15:00.820]  They tell you they are quasi-criminal, but there is no such jurisdiction created by Constitution or law in the state of Texas or at the federal level.
[15:00.820 --> 15:04.820]  There is no such thing as quasi-criminal.
[15:04.820 --> 15:09.820]  It's not a valid jurisdictional status.
[15:09.820 --> 15:11.820]  Okay, it's not.
[15:11.820 --> 15:16.820]  Courts are given jurisdiction civilly, criminally, or administratively.
[15:16.820 --> 15:20.820]  But there is no such status as quasi-criminal.
[15:20.820 --> 15:35.820]  They put all of the offenses in the transportation code, with the exception of red light camera citations, which were 100% administrative and unconstitutional, under the criminal banner.
[15:35.820 --> 15:41.820]  So there is no quasi-attached to it when they assign it to the rules of criminal procedure.
[15:41.820 --> 15:45.820]  There are no separate quasi-criminal rules.
[15:45.820 --> 15:47.820]  Okay?
[15:47.820 --> 15:50.820]  So we've got two arguments here.
[15:50.820 --> 15:54.820]  Either this is a crime, or it's not.
[15:54.820 --> 15:58.820]  And if it's not, how did you get jurisdiction of it?
[15:58.820 --> 16:02.820]  Okay, you say it's a class C misdemeanor.
[16:02.820 --> 16:04.820]  That's a crime.
[16:04.820 --> 16:06.820]  Okay, that's not an infraction.
[16:06.820 --> 16:07.820]  That's not civil.
[16:07.820 --> 16:10.820]  That's not half civil and half criminal.
[16:10.820 --> 16:11.820]  That's criminal.
[16:11.820 --> 16:13.820]  It's a misdemeanor.
[16:13.820 --> 16:17.820]  So where's the quasi coming from?
[16:17.820 --> 16:30.820]  They're calling it quasi because the Texas Statues specifically omit criminal intent, mens rea, from the language of the statues.
[16:30.820 --> 16:39.820]  But we just read that that does not mean it's not a required element of the alleged offense.
[16:39.820 --> 16:41.820]  We just read that.
[16:41.820 --> 16:49.820]  Okay, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[16:49.820 --> 16:58.820]  If you want to call and get in line to talk, I do have the phones on, but I'm going to keep those up this discussion on the other side when we get back until I get somebody else to talk to.
[16:58.820 --> 17:22.820]  Bye, guys.
[17:29.820 --> 17:34.820]  Bye-bye, younger cookies.
[17:34.820 --> 17:46.820]  Now, I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookie.
[17:46.820 --> 17:48.820]  No cookies for me.
[17:48.820 --> 17:50.820]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:50.820 --> 17:57.820]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[17:57.820 --> 17:58.820]  Thank you, Mr. Cookie.
[17:58.820 --> 18:27.820]  Bye-bye.
[18:28.820 --> 18:54.820]  Thank you, Mr. Cookie.
[18:54.820 --> 19:00.820]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[19:24.820 --> 19:37.820]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:37.820 --> 19:39.820]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:39.820 --> 19:44.820]  The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[19:44.820 --> 19:50.820]  I do have a caller on the board, but I do want to go on with this for just a couple minutes before I take this caller.
[19:50.820 --> 19:51.820]  So please hang on, caller.
[19:51.820 --> 19:53.820]  I will be with you in just a minute.
[19:53.820 --> 20:00.820]  Okay, so think about how that's going to work when you go into court and they start trying to prosecute you for a crime,
[20:00.820 --> 20:07.820]  but they haven't alleged that you intended to commit said crime because you were thinking about it when you did it.
[20:07.820 --> 20:12.820]  You did it intentionally to act in bad faith.
[20:12.820 --> 20:19.820]  The Supreme Court says that's a mandatory requirement of criminal conduct.
[20:19.820 --> 20:33.820]  How is the state saying it's not by calling these things quasi-criminal and that they don't have to both assert and prove intent?
[20:33.820 --> 20:38.820]  They have to prove willfulness, but they aren't doing it.
[20:38.820 --> 20:40.820]  Why?
[20:40.820 --> 20:44.820]  Because nobody's beaten them up with Supreme Court interpretations.
[20:44.820 --> 20:46.820]  That's why.
[20:46.820 --> 20:49.820]  Well, that's going to change in the new seminar material.
[20:49.820 --> 20:52.820]  The new seminar material is taking this stuff into account.
[20:52.820 --> 20:56.820]  We're going to force their hand on this one way or the other.
[20:56.820 --> 21:03.820]  We're either going to get them to produce Supreme Court precedent in support of their position or they're not going to be able to,
[21:03.820 --> 21:14.820]  and we're going to set new case precedent by getting Texas prosecutors and our courts under the gun again in front of the United States Supreme Court.
[21:14.820 --> 21:25.820]  They've already lost down near every battle they've engaged in at the Supreme Court level trying to justify their actions in so many kinds of cases.
[21:25.820 --> 21:28.820]  Gillespie versus...
[21:28.820 --> 21:32.820]  Rocksbury versus Gillespie County, for instance.
[21:32.820 --> 21:34.820]  Okay?
[21:34.820 --> 21:36.820]  I mean, just so many.
[21:36.820 --> 21:38.820]  Public photography of public officials.
[21:38.820 --> 21:45.820]  They have lost and lost and lost every single time because the Texas Court is saying what we're doing is fine.
[21:45.820 --> 21:48.820]  And the Supreme Court's going, no, it isn't.
[21:48.820 --> 21:50.820]  Here's why it isn't.
[21:50.820 --> 21:54.820]  Stop doing it.
[21:54.820 --> 21:56.820]  So now it's time to up the ante.
[21:56.820 --> 22:01.820]  It's time to take it to them and make them change it.
[22:01.820 --> 22:07.820]  They either have to prove their case completely or they lose it.
[22:07.820 --> 22:09.820]  That's simple.
[22:09.820 --> 22:10.820]  All right.
[22:10.820 --> 22:15.820]  That said, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[22:15.820 --> 22:16.820]  I got one caller.
[22:16.820 --> 22:17.820]  I need some more.
[22:17.820 --> 22:19.820]  Right now, let's see who we got.
[22:19.820 --> 22:22.820]  Okay, caller, this says E.J. in California.
[22:22.820 --> 22:24.820]  Who am I talking to?
[22:24.820 --> 22:27.820]  Hi, this is E.J. from California.
[22:27.820 --> 22:29.820]  Well, then I guess I'm good.
[22:29.820 --> 22:34.820]  All right, E.J., what can we do for you?
[22:34.820 --> 22:38.820]  Okay, so I had a case and I emailed you regarding this.
[22:38.820 --> 22:46.820]  It's all over with, but I'm just going back to see things that I didn't know about.
[22:46.820 --> 22:49.820]  And so after the case was dismissed.
[22:49.820 --> 22:52.820]  When did you email this to me?
[22:52.820 --> 22:56.820]  I think it was a long time ago, maybe like two and a half months ago.
[22:56.820 --> 23:00.820]  I said, hi, this is E.J.
[23:00.820 --> 23:10.820]  And then I said I had a case and I asked if this is your channel and you replied yes,
[23:10.820 --> 23:15.820]  but I was able to get it dismissed.
[23:15.820 --> 23:21.820]  But I had a question because there was, you know, what they do is at the courthouse,
[23:21.820 --> 23:27.820]  they try to just reel you along, you know, they try to frighten you,
[23:27.820 --> 23:30.820]  intimidate you. It's my first time in the courthouse.
[23:30.820 --> 23:38.820]  So what I do is put a motion to dismiss paperwork through the courthouse.
[23:38.820 --> 23:43.820]  So I did exactly the 10 days.
[23:43.820 --> 23:50.820]  And I remember seeing in the statutes and codes saying that the date of that I mail
[23:50.820 --> 23:59.820]  and I have proof of mailing, certified mail to the DA's office as well as what did I do?
[23:59.820 --> 24:04.820]  Yeah, just the proof of mail because what I did was I motion to dismiss,
[24:04.820 --> 24:08.820]  I went to the courthouse and it was exactly 10 days.
[24:08.820 --> 24:17.820]  But at the hearing, 10 days meaning the date of when I mailed to the DA
[24:17.820 --> 24:21.820]  and when I went to the courthouse I just got a stamp filed.
[24:21.820 --> 24:26.820]  The 10th day was the day of the hearing.
[24:26.820 --> 24:34.820]  I'm fine, right, in your opinion because when I ask the court, court clerk,
[24:34.820 --> 24:38.820]  you know what they say to me? We can't answer that for you.
[24:38.820 --> 24:41.820]  You need to get an attorney.
[24:41.820 --> 24:47.820]  Well, it's true that the court clerk can't give you legal advice but they can darn sure answer
[24:47.820 --> 24:52.820]  administrative questions relating on where you file something,
[24:52.820 --> 24:57.820]  is there a particular format that something has to be in, do you have a template for that,
[24:57.820 --> 25:01.820]  do you know where I can find one for that, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[25:01.820 --> 25:03.820]  Those kinds of questions they can answer.
[25:03.820 --> 25:08.820]  What they cannot do is give you legal advice such as you need to get legal counsel.
[25:08.820 --> 25:11.820]  See, that's actually giving you legal advice.
[25:11.820 --> 25:16.820]  They're telling you you need to get a lawyer.
[25:16.820 --> 25:19.820]  But they're also giving legal advice if they try to tell you,
[25:19.820 --> 25:22.820]  well, the judge is going to decide this way or this way,
[25:22.820 --> 25:25.820]  or this statute means this, or this statute means that,
[25:25.820 --> 25:28.820]  or that's not the way that works, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera,
[25:28.820 --> 25:31.820]  or you can't handle your case this way, you got to do it this way.
[25:31.820 --> 25:36.820]  All those things are legal advice, all of them.
[25:36.820 --> 25:41.820]  Even if I asked them, I thought it was an administrative question saying that,
[25:41.820 --> 25:44.820]  okay, those 10th day, if I file it today,
[25:44.820 --> 25:51.820]  and I said I want a motion hearing for my motion to dismiss,
[25:51.820 --> 25:58.820]  and they said, oh, no, you need to get a lawyer.
[25:58.820 --> 26:00.820]  They can't give you legal advice.
[26:00.820 --> 26:04.820]  No, that's definitely a question they have to respond to.
[26:04.820 --> 26:09.820]  The clerks do not get to decide what they do or don't do in relation to a case
[26:09.820 --> 26:13.820]  as long as it's something that falls within the normal realms of conducting a case.
[26:13.820 --> 26:17.820]  Filing pleadings, now, when you say you wanted to schedule a hearing,
[26:17.820 --> 26:22.820]  did you file a written motion for that purpose, or did you just ask somebody?
[26:22.820 --> 26:28.820]  Oh, no, I had all my paperwork, and they stamped it filed.
[26:28.820 --> 26:30.820]  It was a motion to dismiss.
[26:30.820 --> 26:36.820]  Right, but you asked for a hearing on your motion.
[26:36.820 --> 26:38.820]  Yes, and that's the 10th day.
[26:38.820 --> 26:43.820]  Okay, did you file a motion for hearing?
[26:43.820 --> 26:45.820]  No, I didn't.
[26:45.820 --> 26:46.820]  There you go.
[26:46.820 --> 26:48.820]  That's why they were ignoring you.
[26:48.820 --> 26:56.820]  You don't ask the clerk to set a hearing for you unless you do it in writing through a proper motion.
[26:56.820 --> 27:02.820]  You have to make a motion for a motion's hearing, and you file that with your other stuff,
[27:02.820 --> 27:06.820]  and the way you do that is when you go into the clerk,
[27:06.820 --> 27:13.820]  you ask them to check the judge's calendar and find you three open dates and times.
[27:13.820 --> 27:14.820]  Okay?
[27:14.820 --> 27:15.820]  Okay.
[27:15.820 --> 27:23.820]  Then you ask the prosecutor if any of these dates and times are a problem,
[27:23.820 --> 27:27.820]  and if you don't hear back from them within three days,
[27:27.820 --> 27:31.820]  you pick one of those three dates yourself and you don't worry about it.
[27:31.820 --> 27:37.820]  You then put it into a written motion requesting a motion's hearing on such and such motion,
[27:37.820 --> 27:41.820]  or each motion filed, and list them out,
[27:41.820 --> 27:45.820]  and then you say on this date at this time in this court,
[27:45.820 --> 27:49.820]  and then you file it with the clerk of the court, you get stamped copies,
[27:49.820 --> 27:52.820]  and you send one of those stamped copies to the prosecutor.
[27:52.820 --> 27:53.820]  Yes.
[27:53.820 --> 27:54.820]  Yes.
[27:54.820 --> 27:55.820]  That's what I did.
[27:55.820 --> 27:56.820]  Okay.
[27:56.820 --> 27:58.820]  But you didn't do it for the hearing.
[27:58.820 --> 28:00.820]  You did it for everything else.
[28:00.820 --> 28:03.820]  That's what I'm hearing you tell me.
[28:03.820 --> 28:04.820]  Yes.
[28:04.820 --> 28:09.820]  I didn't know I was supposed to do that motion for motion hearing or whatever that is.
[28:09.820 --> 28:10.820]  Yes.
[28:10.820 --> 28:14.820]  You'd make a request for a hearing on your motions in writing.
[28:14.820 --> 28:15.820]  In writing?
[28:15.820 --> 28:16.820]  In writing.
[28:16.820 --> 28:17.820]  In writing.
[28:17.820 --> 28:21.820]  So in the future, even with the traffic ticket, I need to do that.
[28:21.820 --> 28:22.820]  With any case.
[28:22.820 --> 28:23.820]  Citation.
[28:23.820 --> 28:24.820]  With any case.
[28:24.820 --> 28:25.820]  With any case.
[28:25.820 --> 28:26.820]  Hmm.
[28:26.820 --> 28:29.820]  Do you mind if I send you my, I don't know.
[28:29.820 --> 28:31.820]  You can send me the email.
[28:31.820 --> 28:34.820]  I don't recall seeing it, but you can most certainly send it.
[28:34.820 --> 28:35.820]  Okay.
[28:35.820 --> 28:42.820]  Because I just said this is a notice of my motion to dismiss.
[28:42.820 --> 28:48.820]  So I'm noticing the judge, I'm noticing the DA, all the parties involved.
[28:48.820 --> 28:53.820]  So it's like a notice and it's going to be at this date, this time.
[28:53.820 --> 28:57.820]  And that was like the 10th day, but still the judge dismissed it.
[28:57.820 --> 28:59.820]  You know, I would not dismiss.
[28:59.820 --> 29:00.820]  I'm sorry.
[29:00.820 --> 29:03.820]  He ruled against the motion.
[29:03.820 --> 29:12.820]  Because you know, the stupid prosecutor said, we didn't get it until, you know, five days,
[29:12.820 --> 29:14.820]  but I sent it certified.
[29:14.820 --> 29:15.820]  Okay.
[29:15.820 --> 29:16.820]  Exactly.
[29:16.820 --> 29:18.820]  What you should have done was object.
[29:18.820 --> 29:20.820]  The prosecution is lying to the court.
[29:20.820 --> 29:25.820]  Here's my receipts showing the day it was mailed and the date it was received.
[29:25.820 --> 29:27.820]  There was no response.
[29:27.820 --> 29:28.820]  There was no action.
[29:28.820 --> 29:30.820]  There was nothing on the motion.
[29:30.820 --> 29:32.820]  Therefore they defaulted.
[29:32.820 --> 29:34.820]  Therefore I moved to dismiss.
[29:34.820 --> 29:36.820]  So you got to assert yourself.
[29:36.820 --> 29:40.820]  If you say nothing, they get away with everything they're doing.
[29:40.820 --> 29:41.820]  No, exactly.
[29:41.820 --> 29:43.820]  I should have objected.
[29:43.820 --> 29:44.820]  Right.
[29:44.820 --> 29:47.820]  Hang on just a second and we'll carry on this conversation on the other side.
[29:47.820 --> 29:49.820]  I just got to take a quick break.
[29:49.820 --> 29:50.820]  Okay?
[29:50.820 --> 29:51.820]  Okay.
[29:51.820 --> 29:52.820]  Thank you.
[29:52.820 --> 29:53.820]  All right, folks.
[29:53.820 --> 29:54.820]  This is rule of law radio.
[29:54.820 --> 29:56.820]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:56.820 --> 29:57.820]  Give us a call.
[29:57.820 --> 29:58.820]  Get in line.
[29:58.820 --> 30:00.820]  Let's talk.
[30:00.820 --> 30:05.820]  I only have eyes for you.
[30:05.820 --> 30:08.820]  Soon, store mannequins may be singing that tune.
[30:08.820 --> 30:12.820]  They're being outfitted with cameras to watch us while we shop.
[30:12.820 --> 30:15.820]  Mr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details after this.
[30:42.820 --> 30:52.820]  It's disturbing enough that big brother governments use facial recognition technology to identify and track people on the streets.
[30:52.820 --> 30:57.820]  Now clothing companies in Europe, Canada and America are getting in on the act.
[30:57.820 --> 30:59.820]  So where do they hide the cameras?
[30:59.820 --> 31:01.820]  In the eyes of mannequins.
[31:01.820 --> 31:02.820]  That's right.
[31:02.820 --> 31:06.820]  Those glamorous plastic ladies in the display windows may be watching you back.
[31:06.820 --> 31:15.820]  They're called eye seers and their job is to log the age, gender and race of passersby so retailers can devise new schemes to get you to buy.
[31:15.820 --> 31:19.820]  But hang on, aren't mannequins spooky enough already?
[31:19.820 --> 31:22.820]  This is taking weird science to a whole new level.
[31:22.820 --> 31:37.820]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:53.820 --> 31:57.820]  That saves you space, time and money. Call 888-910-4367.
[31:57.820 --> 32:23.820]  Only at USA.org.
[32:27.820 --> 32:35.820]  Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[32:35.820 --> 32:41.820]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.820 --> 32:48.820]  By ordering now you will receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:48.820 --> 32:51.820]  Hundreds of research documents and further useful resource material.
[32:51.820 --> 32:55.820]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.820 --> 32:59.820]  For your copy today and together we can have the first society we all want and deserve.
[33:25.820 --> 33:32.820]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[33:32.820 --> 33:41.820]  You can get your own copy of Eddie's book, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[33:41.820 --> 33:56.820]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[33:56.820 --> 34:05.820]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[34:05.820 --> 34:12.820]  All right, E.J., please continue. E.J., are you there?
[34:12.820 --> 34:17.820]  Oh, I'm sorry. I put the call on mute.
[34:17.820 --> 34:19.820]  Yeah.
[34:19.820 --> 34:24.820]  My second question, if I can read this letter.
[34:24.820 --> 34:40.820]  This lady in Canada, they have the red light tickets which are unconstitutional as you said during the call.
[34:40.820 --> 34:52.820]  Could I read this letter and she was able to dismiss it just writing a letter to the courthouse?
[34:52.820 --> 34:55.820]  Now, who wrote this letter?
[34:55.820 --> 35:08.820]  So, her name is Susan Anderson and she's up in Canada and her address is in Calvary and she was able to dismiss it.
[35:08.820 --> 35:17.820]  The red light traffic and it's a provincial court traffic and this is in June, so early this month.
[35:17.820 --> 35:19.820]  Where are you located?
[35:19.820 --> 35:28.820]  I'm in California, Southern California in Orange County, but I was on a call because there was a call on Sunday.
[35:28.820 --> 35:34.820]  I probably heard of it. It's glorious, not glorious or something.
[35:34.820 --> 35:45.820]  I know common law is not very instinctive with what you do, right? Common law?
[35:45.820 --> 35:52.820]  No, the thing is, is people these days are mistaking what common law was for what common law is.
[35:52.820 --> 36:00.820]  Common law on the original days was simply the law determined by the judges and it was unwritten,
[36:00.820 --> 36:07.820]  which means every judge could interpret it any way he wanted and make it different depending upon where they were located.
[36:07.820 --> 36:15.820]  Nowadays, common law has been codified into the penal code of the individual states.
[36:15.820 --> 36:26.820]  All of the offenses, almost all of the offenses in the penal code are the original common law offenses a person could be tried for.
[36:26.820 --> 36:35.820]  Murder, theft, burglary, bribery, assault, all of those are in each state's penal code.
[36:35.820 --> 36:42.820]  That is your original common law as far as the criminal side goes, okay?
[36:42.820 --> 36:49.820]  The civil side is all the contract stuff, all the agreement stuff, all the living in society stuff.
[36:49.820 --> 36:57.820]  That's the common law civil, okay? That's also been codified into other areas of the law.
[36:57.820 --> 37:06.820]  The reason for this was is so that the judges can't change it across the board anymore.
[37:06.820 --> 37:12.820]  For instance, in Texas, you can't have a judge in this county doing it one way and a judge in that county doing it another way
[37:12.820 --> 37:16.820]  and a district judge over here doing it this way, et cetera, et cetera.
[37:16.820 --> 37:23.820]  They're all limited by what the state law says as is codified for the common law in those areas.
[37:23.820 --> 37:30.820]  And then the rest of it is regulatory law, imitating law, okay?
[37:30.820 --> 37:33.820]  You see what I'm saying?
[37:33.820 --> 37:40.820]  No, I need to, I need to, what do you call it, educate myself.
[37:40.820 --> 37:42.820]  I need to rehear what you're saying.
[37:42.820 --> 37:47.820]  But whatever, what everybody else is calling common law has not disappeared,
[37:47.820 --> 37:54.820]  but it also does not work the way they keep wanting people to think it works, that it doesn't exist in the statutes.
[37:54.820 --> 37:56.820]  It does.
[37:56.820 --> 38:07.820]  It's been written into the statutes so that it's consistent from now on, unlike what it was before.
[38:07.820 --> 38:16.820]  So these particular sections of written statute are now the written version of the common law.
[38:16.820 --> 38:17.820]  You get that?
[38:17.820 --> 38:18.820]  Yeah.
[38:18.820 --> 38:21.820]  So that's why we need to know it inside out.
[38:21.820 --> 38:26.820]  We need to re-read, keep re-reading the different statutes.
[38:26.820 --> 38:33.820]  And each state has worded its common law interpretation slightly different,
[38:33.820 --> 38:40.820]  but at least it's consistent throughout that state, even if it's not entirely consistent between every state.
[38:40.820 --> 38:42.820]  You get that?
[38:42.820 --> 38:43.820]  Yeah.
[38:43.820 --> 38:44.820]  Yeah.
[38:44.820 --> 38:47.820]  So therein lies the situation.
[38:47.820 --> 38:49.820]  The common law is not dead.
[38:49.820 --> 38:50.820]  It's not forgotten.
[38:50.820 --> 38:52.820]  It's not thrown out the window.
[38:52.820 --> 38:56.820]  It just has a different form than it used to have.
[38:56.820 --> 39:03.820]  It was much more malleable when the judges could mold it every time they sat down in the chair.
[39:03.820 --> 39:05.820]  Now they can't do that.
[39:05.820 --> 39:13.820]  And that benefits us rather than them.
[39:13.820 --> 39:14.820]  Yeah.
[39:14.820 --> 39:18.820]  So I would be interested in seeing what it was this woman wrote for you to give.
[39:18.820 --> 39:23.820]  Now you do have to remember one other thing about California versus many other states.
[39:23.820 --> 39:28.820]  There are several states like California where this is being a traffic infraction.
[39:28.820 --> 39:30.820]  It's not treated as criminal.
[39:30.820 --> 39:34.820]  It's treated as 100% administrative.
[39:34.820 --> 39:35.820]  Yeah.
[39:35.820 --> 39:40.820]  Now I haven't spent any time in California, even though I've helped lots of people beat cases there.
[39:40.820 --> 39:46.820]  They never finished giving me the feedback to show me the entire process.
[39:46.820 --> 39:55.820]  But when you lose a case at the commissioner level, are you allowed to appeal it to a judicial court?
[39:55.820 --> 39:57.820]  Yes, we are.
[39:57.820 --> 39:58.820]  Okay.
[39:58.820 --> 40:09.820]  See, the reason that requirement exists, that if they do it administratively, you have to have the right of appeal in a judicial court is common law.
[40:09.820 --> 40:25.820]  Because it is a constitutional prohibition on the bill of pains and penalties that requires judicial review of any punishment, whether that punishment is monetary or physical or both.
[40:25.820 --> 40:28.820]  You get it?
[40:28.820 --> 40:33.820]  Um, I'm new to this, so I need to learn from you.
[40:33.820 --> 40:34.820]  Okay.
[40:34.820 --> 40:43.820]  And I know you have, I'm going to go to your website, Tal of Law, and then the, you know, this is all this verbiage.
[40:43.820 --> 40:49.820]  I still need to get used to and learn more.
[40:49.820 --> 40:58.820]  So I'm still, luckily, I did get it dismissed because what happened was, you know, I mean, it's in the code and statute.
[40:58.820 --> 41:00.820]  They don't even follow it.
[41:00.820 --> 41:08.820]  And the complainant needs to, under penalty of perjury, okay, sign the complaint.
[41:08.820 --> 41:10.820]  They never sign it.
[41:10.820 --> 41:12.820]  And they still move forward with it.
[41:12.820 --> 41:17.820]  I just don't understand why they would do that.
[41:17.820 --> 41:25.820]  All I get is the charging document from the DA saying, oh, you know, we're going to charge you.
[41:25.820 --> 41:31.820]  The penalty of perjury, they, it's not even, what do you call it?
[41:31.820 --> 41:44.820]  What's the word when, you know, you put your hand on the Bible, you say, you know, what I'm going to say is nothing but the truth, you know, to help me God.
[41:44.820 --> 41:45.820]  What is that?
[41:45.820 --> 41:47.820]  Penalty of perjury?
[41:47.820 --> 41:50.820]  They don't even have that in file.
[41:50.820 --> 41:54.820]  They just have a stupid charging document with whatever.
[41:54.820 --> 41:57.820]  The complaint is not required to be sworn under oath.
[41:57.820 --> 42:00.820]  Never has been, and it's not in any state.
[42:00.820 --> 42:07.820]  The sworn criminal statement in a crime is required to be signed under oath.
[42:07.820 --> 42:13.820]  We're talking about two different procedural documents that do two very different things.
[42:13.820 --> 42:14.820]  Oh, I see.
[42:14.820 --> 42:15.820]  Okay.
[42:15.820 --> 42:21.820]  The criminal statement would not apply in your case because your case is a civil infraction.
[42:21.820 --> 42:24.820]  It's not a crime.
[42:24.820 --> 42:35.820]  That's the only reason they can put it into an administrative venue in the first place is because it's civil, because administrative court is another form of civil court.
[42:35.820 --> 42:36.820]  Okay.
[42:36.820 --> 42:37.820]  You're breaking it down for me.
[42:37.820 --> 42:40.820]  However, mine was a criminal case.
[42:40.820 --> 42:41.820]  No, it's not.
[42:41.820 --> 42:42.820]  You're in California.
[42:42.820 --> 42:46.820]  It's not a, it's not a criminal case if it's traffic.
[42:46.820 --> 42:49.820]  It absolutely isn't.
[42:49.820 --> 42:50.820]  I know.
[42:50.820 --> 42:55.820]  I've got the California case law that says so.
[42:55.820 --> 42:59.820]  No, mine is not traffic.
[42:59.820 --> 43:00.820]  Oh, okay.
[43:00.820 --> 43:02.820]  I thought you said red light camera.
[43:02.820 --> 43:03.820]  Oh, no.
[43:03.820 --> 43:19.820]  So I'm jumping back and forth from this because I know this is the traffic through our marathon to our call, but my personal dismissal was not traffic.
[43:19.820 --> 43:20.820]  Okay.
[43:20.820 --> 43:21.820]  All right.
[43:21.820 --> 43:22.820]  Well, let me clarify one other thing for you.
[43:22.820 --> 43:24.820]  I don't just do traffic.
[43:24.820 --> 43:28.820]  It's what I talk about the most because it's what people run into the most.
[43:28.820 --> 43:29.820]  But it's not all I do.
[43:29.820 --> 43:31.820]  It's not all I've done.
[43:31.820 --> 43:32.820]  Okay.
[43:32.820 --> 43:34.820]  So, but hang on just a second.
[43:34.820 --> 43:41.820]  I got another break and then I would like for you to explain to me what your situation was that you went into fight.
[43:41.820 --> 43:42.820]  Okay.
[43:42.820 --> 43:43.820]  So hang on just a second.
[43:43.820 --> 43:45.820]  Let me get this break done and I'll come back to you.
[43:45.820 --> 43:46.820]  Okay.
[43:46.820 --> 43:49.820]  And don't forget your mute button this time.
[43:49.820 --> 43:50.820]  Okay.
[43:50.820 --> 43:51.820]  All right.
[43:51.820 --> 43:53.820]  Five folks will be right back after the break.
[43:53.820 --> 44:22.820]  512-646-1984.
[44:22.820 --> 44:25.820]  The thousands have won with our step by step course.
[44:25.820 --> 44:27.820]  And now you can too.
[44:27.820 --> 44:33.820]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:33.820 --> 44:42.820]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.820 --> 44:51.820]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.820 --> 45:03.820]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.820 --> 45:04.820]  Hello.
[45:04.820 --> 45:11.820]  My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[45:11.820 --> 45:13.820]  sweet D here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.820 --> 45:18.820]  Find brave new books and chase things to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.820 --> 45:23.820]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.820 --> 45:27.820]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian emu oil,
[45:27.820 --> 45:31.820]  lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.820 --> 45:38.820]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.820 --> 45:43.820]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:43.820 --> 45:47.820]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:47.820 --> 45:50.820]  naturespureorganics.com.
[46:17.820 --> 46:29.820]  Alright folks, we are back.
[46:29.820 --> 46:36.820]  This is rule of law radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[46:36.820 --> 46:40.820]  We're still talking with EJ in California.
[46:40.820 --> 46:46.820]  Alright EJ, let's get down to the issue because you confused me twice with what you said.
[46:46.820 --> 46:52.820]  Once when you said red light camera and once when I specifically asked you if your case was handled administratively
[46:52.820 --> 46:55.820]  and then were you able to appeal it judicially.
[46:55.820 --> 47:00.820]  So to me that led me down the path of thinking we were talking about a traffic case.
[47:00.820 --> 47:06.820]  But if we're not, what is the issue of the case?
[47:06.820 --> 47:13.820]  Since I got it dismissed, it's an assault battery.
[47:13.820 --> 47:16.820]  Okay, of what level of fence?
[47:16.820 --> 47:21.820]  What level, misdemeanor assault battery.
[47:21.820 --> 47:30.820]  Right, but is it class C fine only misdemeanor assault battery or is it jailable assault and battery as a class B or A misdemeanor?
[47:30.820 --> 47:32.820]  Which was it?
[47:32.820 --> 47:36.820]  I think it's A, I'm not even too sure.
[47:36.820 --> 47:39.820]  Could you have gone to jail for it?
[47:39.820 --> 47:41.820]  No, I did not.
[47:41.820 --> 47:43.820]  No, no, no, not did you.
[47:43.820 --> 47:44.820]  Could you have?
[47:44.820 --> 47:49.820]  Could they have sentenced you to jail if they had convicted you?
[47:49.820 --> 47:53.820]  Oh yeah, one year sentence.
[47:53.820 --> 47:57.820]  Okay, then that's probably a class A.
[47:57.820 --> 48:06.820]  Because here in Texas six months or less is a class B, more than six months up to a year is a class A.
[48:06.820 --> 48:12.820]  So yeah, it's a class A then.
[48:12.820 --> 48:22.820]  Okay, so you were accused of assault and battery and you filed a paperwork which I'd be interested in seeing since it's California.
[48:22.820 --> 48:28.820]  I don't work in California for the most part, but I still have people calling from there just like you.
[48:28.820 --> 48:40.820]  And the more I do know about it the better, so I'd be really interested in seeing what you filed and what this other person filed for you or sent you to file or however it was done just so I could see what was going on.
[48:40.820 --> 48:45.820]  It'll help me understand it better and it'll help me the next person that calls me from California better.
[48:45.820 --> 48:48.820]  Sure, I can do that.
[48:48.820 --> 49:06.820]  But second thing is with the, since you were on the topic of red light cameras, you know just CAMS in general, this lady in Canada and I think it relates to U.S. also.
[49:06.820 --> 49:18.820]  She just wrote this to the traffic court and put attention just as if it's a peace counter. Of course it's Canada, so the wording is going to be a little bit different.
[49:18.820 --> 49:37.820]  Please see attached ticket, not signed, parentheses, so no contract. I have not put guilty and or not guilty. I have, I also have not broken any laws as I have not injured or harmed anyone.
[49:37.820 --> 49:49.820]  Thank you for your invitation, but I will not be attending your business center as I have not contracted with the service corporation called the Calvary Parking. Oh, this is a parking ticket.
[49:49.820 --> 49:56.820]  But I thought, oh, parking, so are you sincerely yours?
[49:56.820 --> 50:18.820]  I thought it was for the red light cam. So if you get a red light cam citation through the mail saying that you owe, you know, $700, can you put no contract on there across the citation and send it back to them?
[50:18.820 --> 50:19.820]  Hello?
[50:19.820 --> 50:31.820]  Yes and no. That isn't necessarily going to end the deal. Okay. You may not show up and they may not have the legal authority under California law to issue a warrant for you.
[50:31.820 --> 50:40.820]  But eventually when they catch up with you and get you back in one of those little settings, they're going to hammer you hard for all that past due money, guaranteed.
[50:40.820 --> 50:43.820]  Yeah, yeah, sure.
[50:43.820 --> 50:44.820]  Okay.
[50:44.820 --> 50:45.820]  Unless you motion.
[50:45.820 --> 50:54.820]  Okay. Yeah, it's like $700. But I think the red light timers are all disappearing in California.
[50:54.820 --> 51:02.820]  Well, if people had learned how to argue against them in the first place that they never had to pay a dime into the red light camera system, the red light camera system is bogus.
[51:02.820 --> 51:05.820]  It doesn't matter where it is, it's bogus.
[51:05.820 --> 51:18.820]  What it does is absolutely unconstitutional. But that's beside the point. Until people wake up and realize they can fight back and do it, it's a moot point.
[51:18.820 --> 51:25.820]  It's kind of like the guy that keeps pushing all his friends down in front of the crocodile until he's only the only guy left.
[51:25.820 --> 51:34.820]  He thinks he's saving himself the whole time he's sacrificing everybody else, but eventually it's going to come down to him and the gator.
[51:34.820 --> 51:48.820]  Yes, this is a very helpful channel for these kind of issues. Do you handle when you don't have insurance?
[51:48.820 --> 51:53.820]  Because, you know, it kind of relates to...
[51:53.820 --> 52:02.820]  Okay. In California, the statute is almost crystal clear that it applies to commercial use of the roads and those engaged in it.
[52:02.820 --> 52:13.820]  It's a no-brainer in California. It is so simple to fight a traffic ticket in California because those statutes do not apply to everyday people.
[52:13.820 --> 52:21.820]  They only apply to people conducting business on the roads. And the California statute makes that just shy of crystal clear.
[52:21.820 --> 52:24.820]  Wow. Even speeding.
[52:24.820 --> 52:28.820]  Yes, those are all commercial related offenses.
[52:28.820 --> 52:31.820]  Wow. Unbelievable.
[52:31.820 --> 52:34.820]  Okay.
[52:34.820 --> 52:42.820]  I've got several people I know in California. One goes by the name of a tactical guy and the other is a friend of mine named Michael.
[52:42.820 --> 52:49.820]  And they help people out there all the time, fight all kinds of cases and they are kicking butt and taking names day in and day out.
[52:49.820 --> 52:53.820]  They are getting so much of this crap dismissed. It's not even funny.
[52:53.820 --> 52:56.820]  And you know what they used to do before they started that?
[52:56.820 --> 52:58.820]  No.
[52:58.820 --> 53:01.820]  They listened to this show.
[53:01.820 --> 53:08.820]  Oh my goodness. I wish I knew about YouTube. You don't have a channel in YouTube.
[53:08.820 --> 53:11.820]  Hey, I scoured for YouTube.
[53:11.820 --> 53:17.820]  Well, actually everything that I did that's on YouTube is posted by InfoWars.
[53:17.820 --> 53:22.820]  I've got a two and a half hour presentation on traffic that I did as a guest on InfoWars.
[53:22.820 --> 53:24.820]  Oh, you did?
[53:24.820 --> 53:29.820]  Yep. And I've been a guest on there doing interviews multiple times.
[53:29.820 --> 53:35.820]  If you just do Eddie Craig InfoWars, you'll find a ton of stuff out there.
[53:35.820 --> 53:52.820]  And then if you do Rule of Law Radio Eddie's Night or Rule of Law Radio Eddie Craig, you will find a whole bunch of videos people have made using the podcast of my Monday Night Radio show.
[53:52.820 --> 53:58.820]  They actually put video to the audio of my show.
[53:58.820 --> 54:03.820]  Okay, okay. On the YouTube or on Rule of Law?
[54:03.820 --> 54:11.820]  On YouTube, yes. You can search for any of those things on YouTube and you will find tons of it.
[54:11.820 --> 54:25.820]  Yeah, I think my search words were not good enough because I got other people.
[54:25.820 --> 54:37.820]  There's a musician out there named Eddie Craig. When I was living in Wichita, Kansas, there were three other Eddie Craig's there in the same neighborhood I was in.
[54:37.820 --> 54:46.820]  Yeah, Eddie Craig is a very popular name, I think.
[54:46.820 --> 54:55.820]  So, you know, I think you're right. People just don't have time to go in and fight it. They just pay like my friend.
[54:55.820 --> 55:04.820]  He got caught going through a bad light and she just paid it $250. You know, I think you can fight it.
[55:04.820 --> 55:13.820]  Yeah, you got to remember that if you're dealing with traffic in California, most of these commissioners know that what they're doing is highly unconstitutional and illegal.
[55:13.820 --> 55:21.820]  They just don't care because they know no one's going to come after them no matter how wrong they do it.
[55:21.820 --> 55:35.820]  And see, the problem for them is they don't have legal immunity for the things they do if the person they're doing it to understands how to make them pay for it.
[55:35.820 --> 55:37.820]  How do you do that? How do you make them pay for it?
[55:37.820 --> 55:39.820]  You sue the crap out of them.
[55:39.820 --> 55:47.820]  Okay. For private capacity, they call it through their private capacity.
[55:47.820 --> 55:52.820]  Oh, no. You don't have to sue them in their private capacity, even though they're governmental.
[55:52.820 --> 56:03.820]  You want to sue them both in their private and official capacities because their official capacity is the nexus of the crime their committee gives the individual.
[56:03.820 --> 56:12.820]  Okay. So, if you sue them, I can sue the officer.
[56:12.820 --> 56:19.820]  If you win your case, you can always sue the officer for malicious prosecution.
[56:19.820 --> 56:21.820]  Oh, malicious prosecution.
[56:21.820 --> 56:28.820]  You can't sue the judge in a case that's criminal and that was actually a judicial officer acting judicially.
[56:28.820 --> 56:36.820]  You can't sue that judge, but in a traffic ticket, your first appearance is before a commissioner, not a judge.
[56:36.820 --> 56:44.820]  A commissioner is acting 100% administratively. They have no immunity.
[56:44.820 --> 56:53.820]  Huh. But the judge, okay, so with my case, which has been assault and battery, what, you call it class A or misdemeanor A?
[56:53.820 --> 56:59.820]  Yeah, either misdemeanor A or class A, depending upon how California spells it out.
[56:59.820 --> 57:02.820]  And California may break its time frames down differently.
[57:02.820 --> 57:08.820]  California may have two years on a class A. I don't know. I haven't looked, but I'm just telling you how it is here in Texas.
[57:08.820 --> 57:17.820]  It's six months as a B, over six months, to 12 months as an A. Anything above a year enters the realm of felony.
[57:17.820 --> 57:26.820]  Oh, oh, Texas is different. I know I looked it up and, you know, the different elements, that's one year.
[57:26.820 --> 57:32.820]  I thought, you know, whatever. It's just up to one year.
[57:32.820 --> 57:38.820]  Yeah, then it's a class A if you're talking about Texas, but like I say, I can't say that's 100% accurate for California, but it probably is.
[57:38.820 --> 57:44.820]  Because most states have similar punishments for a particular offense.
[57:44.820 --> 57:51.820]  Well, the judge who first hurt my, the first arraignment, he's a real judge. He's not a commissioner.
[57:51.820 --> 57:59.820]  Right. I'm talking traffic is what goes in front of commissioners. The assault would not have gone before a commissioner.
[57:59.820 --> 58:06.820]  Because that's an actual arrestable and imprisonable offense if you're convicted. You see?
[58:06.820 --> 58:07.820]  Okay, got it.
[58:07.820 --> 58:13.820]  That's why I could not go in front of a commissioner.
[58:13.820 --> 58:15.820]  Okay. Thank you so much.
[58:15.820 --> 58:20.820]  Yes, ma'am. Is that everything? Can I get you to email that subject to me at your earliest convenience?
[58:20.820 --> 58:25.820]  I do have it because I sent you an email a long time ago, so I do have it.
[58:25.820 --> 58:26.820]  Okay.
[58:26.820 --> 58:30.820]  All right. Well, please send it again and thank you for calling in tonight. I appreciate it.
[58:30.820 --> 58:32.820]  Thank you so much.
[58:32.820 --> 58:34.820]  Yes, ma'am. You have a great night.
[58:34.820 --> 58:39.820]  All right. I've got two other callers up on the board, which I will start with as soon as we get back.
[58:39.820 --> 58:46.820]  512-646-1984 is the calling number. If you want to call in, get in line and let's talk. We'll be right back.
[58:46.820 --> 58:57.820]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.820 --> 59:05.820]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:05.820 --> 59:08.820]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.820 --> 59:17.820]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.820 --> 59:27.820]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.820 --> 59:32.820]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.820 --> 59:43.820]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.820 --> 59:50.820]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.820 --> 59:59.820]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[59:59.820 --> 01:00:05.820]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lowstar Lowdowns.
[01:00:05.820 --> 01:00:17.820]  Markets for Monday, the 7th of January, 2018, open with precious metals, gold, $1,288.65 an ounce, silver, $15.70 an ounce, copper, $2.63 an ounce,
[01:00:17.820 --> 01:00:38.820]  oil, Texas Crude, $47.96 a barrel, Brent Crude, $57.06 a barrel, cryptos and order of market cap, Bitcoin, $4,029.64, Ethereum, $153.07, Ripple, XRP, $0.36, and Bitcoin Cash is at $162.06 a crypto coin.
[01:00:38.820 --> 01:00:54.820]  Today in History, the year 1985, the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency launches the Saki Kaki, Japan's first interplanetary spacecraft becoming the first deep space probe to be launched by any country other than the United States or the Soviet Union.
[01:00:54.820 --> 01:00:57.820]  Today in History.
[01:00:57.820 --> 01:01:09.820]  In recent news, Christopher Davila, the father of a missing baby, is behind bars for a child endangerment charge for parking his car at a San Antonio gas station last Friday night with his 8-month-old son in the back seat.
[01:01:09.820 --> 01:01:17.820]  The unfortunate circumstances were that he left the car running and unlocked. Surveillance videos showed a woman approaching the car, getting inside and driving off.
[01:01:17.820 --> 01:01:29.820]  KABB reported that police later found Davila's car at a nearby park, but baby J and the car keys were no longer inside. Investigators believe that the occurrence wasn't a random kidnapping and suspect that Davila knew the woman in the video.
[01:01:29.820 --> 01:01:44.820]  Apparently, Davila's family has not been cooperating with the police either. However, both parents are disputing those claims. Police are urging anyone with information about the case to call 911 or 201-207-76-5.
[01:01:44.820 --> 01:01:56.820]  Bernie Sanders' campaign did not adequately address incidents of sexual harassment, sexist mistreatment, and paid disparities between men and women according to some allegations from multiple women who worked on his 2016 presidential bid.
[01:01:56.820 --> 01:02:11.820]  These allegations came out last Wednesday in the New York Times. Sanders apologizing on CNN said that, quote, I am not going to sit here and tell you that we did everything right in terms of human resources, in terms of addressing the needs that I'm hearing from now.
[01:02:11.820 --> 01:02:22.820]  John Francis, the first, speaking to diplomats in an annual speech known informally as the State of the World, stated that the international community is, quote, experiencing a period of difficulty with the resurgence of nationalistic tendencies.
[01:02:22.820 --> 01:02:39.820]  The reappearance of these impulses today is progressively weakening the multilateral system. Concerning the international migrant problem, he stated that, quote, I do not believe that partial solutions can assist for so universal an issue, and called for, quote, rethinking our relationship with our planet when addressing global warming,
[01:02:39.820 --> 01:02:54.820]  and even touched upon the sexual abuse of children, saying that it was, quote, one of the plagues of our time, mentioning that a meeting of key bishops at the Vatican in February would aim to, quote, shed full light on the facts and to alleviate the wounds caused by such crimes.
[01:02:54.820 --> 01:03:10.820]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for January 7th, 2019.
[01:03:25.820 --> 01:03:34.820]  Because you can't starve about and you can't make a run, those wooden mold boys raise own shotguns.
[01:03:34.820 --> 01:03:44.820]  We say praise, we say ma'am, if you ain't into that, we don't give a damn.
[01:03:44.820 --> 01:03:57.820]  We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the Rocky mountains and the western skies.
[01:03:57.820 --> 01:04:05.820]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:04:05.820 --> 01:04:22.820]  And if you're still listening out there, EJ, we do have a specific YouTube channel, Logos Radio Network, has a YouTube channel there under that name, Logos L-O-G-O-S Radio Network.
[01:04:22.820 --> 01:04:33.820]  And if you look under that, the sub channels, there'll be one for my show, one for Randy's show, and one for all the other shows that we do on this network.
[01:04:33.820 --> 01:04:39.820]  So you can go there and listen to your harsh content about every past thing I've ever talked about on here, okay?
[01:04:39.820 --> 01:04:45.820]  Alright, that said, who is our next caller up here? It is Max in Texas.
[01:04:45.820 --> 01:04:48.820]  Max, is this really Max?
[01:04:48.820 --> 01:04:52.820]  Yes it is, it's the incredible Eddie Craig.
[01:04:52.820 --> 01:04:55.820]  Well, I thought you were still gone.
[01:04:55.820 --> 01:05:06.820]  No, no, I moved out here in Montgomery County, but I got married and have teenage stepchildren now, so I'm almost like being gone.
[01:05:06.820 --> 01:05:13.820]  Yeah, well, my condolences on all the above when this train hits, okay?
[01:05:13.820 --> 01:05:15.820]  What can I do for you, sir?
[01:05:15.820 --> 01:05:21.820]  I'm super glad to hear you back live. I kind of had a hiatus there for a little while.
[01:05:21.820 --> 01:05:29.820]  Yeah, I did. I've got so much stuff in the works, trying to work on the new seminar material, computer upgrades and fall apart and stuff like that.
[01:05:29.820 --> 01:05:35.820]  I've been just dealing with so much crap I had to do something. I was pulled in more ways than I could stretch.
[01:05:35.820 --> 01:05:45.820]  But it's all worked out now. Things are starting to look up. I've got an online class scheduled to begin again, so we're looking good.
[01:05:45.820 --> 01:05:52.820]  Well, that's good. Look, I wanted to kind of have you refresh my memory.
[01:05:52.820 --> 01:06:08.820]  I've been a little out of practice lately, but I still talk about municipal ordinances and how they only apply to employees of the municipal corporation and the people it contracts with, the persons it contracts with, I guess we should say.
[01:06:08.820 --> 01:06:19.820]  And I was wondering if you could, and I know it takes a while to get the archives up, so I'm recording, if you could rattle me off some sources where I can get that in writing when I share it with people, it's not just me saying it.
[01:06:19.820 --> 01:06:24.820]  I don't know if it was statutory or if it's in case law or both.
[01:06:24.820 --> 01:06:28.820]  Now wait, ask that again. I want to make sure I'm understanding this.
[01:06:28.820 --> 01:06:40.820]  I just, I want to be able to, when I tell people that municipal ordinances only apply to the employees of the municipality or persons that they contract with, those are the people that municipal ordinances apply to.
[01:06:40.820 --> 01:06:46.820]  Is there some way that I can point to them? See, there it is in writing, or do I have to do this?
[01:06:46.820 --> 01:06:52.820]  No, you've got to explain it to them because it encompasses more. There's no specific statute for that.
[01:06:52.820 --> 01:07:00.820]  It's written into the Texas Constitution, Article 3, Sections 29 through 39 and Article 3, Section 1 specifically.
[01:07:00.820 --> 01:07:06.820]  Article 3, Section 1 delegates the power to create law only to the Texas legislature.
[01:07:06.820 --> 01:07:14.820]  29 through 39 says how every law the legislature creates must begin, be processed, and how it must end.
[01:07:14.820 --> 01:07:22.820]  If it does not comply with that entirety of that procedure, it is not a law according to the Texas Constitution.
[01:07:22.820 --> 01:07:33.820]  None of the procedures and none of the requirements that are in those sections of the Texas Constitution can be met by a municipal ordinance, not a single one.
[01:07:33.820 --> 01:07:45.820]  And the Texas legislature cannot delegate a constitutionally granted power to anybody, not a county, not a municipality.
[01:07:45.820 --> 01:07:54.820]  So I'll tell you what I'm running into is I know that and I know that you can break it down and come to that conclusion,
[01:07:54.820 --> 01:08:01.820]  but I've been listening to the show a long time. So for newbies who haven't been listening to the show and who aren't that passingly familiar,
[01:08:01.820 --> 01:08:06.820]  I was hoping there was some way to shortcut it, but it sounds like you have to just kind of walk them down the,
[01:08:06.820 --> 01:08:15.820]  hey, this is a system of delegated powers and, you know, you got to follow the track and understand that it never got down to that granular level kind of thing.
[01:08:15.820 --> 01:08:18.820]  So it's almost like there's no way, there's nothing I can point to them to prove it.
[01:08:18.820 --> 01:08:21.820]  There's just a whole bunch of stuff that I can say that they can't do.
[01:08:21.820 --> 01:08:29.820]  If they can read it's self-evident, but you're assuming they can read and understand, which isn't necessarily self-evident.
[01:08:29.820 --> 01:08:31.820]  No, it's not.
[01:08:31.820 --> 01:08:40.820]  Okay, so the simple answer there is, read me what Article 3, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution says.
[01:08:40.820 --> 01:08:45.820]  Who has given the power to make law? Okay, that's who can make it.
[01:08:45.820 --> 01:08:52.820]  Now, where does the Constitution say how it must be made? That's Article 3, Sections 29 through 39.
[01:08:52.820 --> 01:09:01.820]  Please show me where that power is ever delegated to a municipality, which is covered under Article 11, Section 5,
[01:09:01.820 --> 01:09:14.820]  which specifically states that a municipality and their ordinances have no power to alter, change, or disagree with any provision of the Texas Constitution.
[01:09:14.820 --> 01:09:23.820]  Well, if the Constitution says they don't have the power to make law, they cannot disagree that with that by making an ordinance and calling it law.
[01:09:23.820 --> 01:09:32.820]  And neither can anyone else. The courts can't do it, the prosecutors can't do it, the Attorney General can't do it, the Governor can't do it.
[01:09:32.820 --> 01:09:38.820]  The legislature can't do it. Got it?
[01:09:38.820 --> 01:09:48.820]  I got it. I was just making sure there wasn't some case law or something that made it a little more clear.
[01:09:48.820 --> 01:09:57.820]  I got to let you go, Eddie, but I just thought I'd rattle that off and see if you had a little short circuit and that way I don't have to have people study, but it sounds like there's no way around that.
[01:09:57.820 --> 01:10:04.820]  No, you're going to have to get them, you're going to have to at least hold their hand and walk them through the specific sections.
[01:10:04.820 --> 01:10:19.820]  Okay, and then you can give them the job. If you want to prove me wrong, all you've got to do is find something that's a higher authority than the state constitution and show me where it says something that nullifies what I just showed you.
[01:10:19.820 --> 01:10:27.820]  If you can do that, you win. If you can't, then I've answered your question.
[01:10:27.820 --> 01:10:29.820]  Got it.
[01:10:29.820 --> 01:10:34.820]  Thank you very much, Eddie. Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in. Glad to hear from you again.
[01:10:34.820 --> 01:10:36.820]  Yes, you too.
[01:10:36.820 --> 01:10:39.820]  All right. Take care, Max.
[01:10:39.820 --> 01:10:47.820]  All right. Next up is Stephen. Stephen, where are you calling from?
[01:10:47.820 --> 01:10:50.820]  Stephen in Hillsboro.
[01:10:50.820 --> 01:10:54.820]  Okay. What are we going to do for you, Stephen, in Hillsboro?
[01:10:54.820 --> 01:10:59.820]  I'm going to call up on what that guy said between the lag and what I'm listening to.
[01:10:59.820 --> 01:11:10.820]  All I wanted to say was there is a good spot he can look to immediately, and it's every set of municipal ordinances comes with a set of definitions.
[01:11:10.820 --> 01:11:21.820]  And he knows, and you know the exact definition that person is in absolutely, positively every municipal set of ordinances that you can pull up online here in Texas.
[01:11:21.820 --> 01:11:25.820]  Almost everyone of them is put up by Franklin Publishing.
[01:11:25.820 --> 01:11:28.820]  Isn't that what it is, Franklin Legal or whatever they are?
[01:11:28.820 --> 01:11:32.820]  Well, there are several different places that may publish them here in Texas.
[01:11:32.820 --> 01:11:37.820]  The city, Austin, actually hosts its own website for pulling that stuff up.
[01:11:37.820 --> 01:11:38.820]  Okay.
[01:11:38.820 --> 01:11:42.820]  And then there are other agencies that publish them on their sites.
[01:11:42.820 --> 01:11:49.820]  The Texas legislature has its own dedicated website that's not run outside of the legislature, like some states do.
[01:11:49.820 --> 01:11:55.820]  Some states have LexisNexis running their statutory management website.
[01:11:55.820 --> 01:11:58.820]  So it varies, but yes, I understand what you're saying.
[01:11:58.820 --> 01:12:03.820]  What are you saying specifically let the audience know about person?
[01:12:03.820 --> 01:12:11.820]  Specifically what I'm stating goes to the exact point he was asking, which is, is there something I can immediately point to?
[01:12:11.820 --> 01:12:16.820]  Pull up the ordinances online, type in anybody's smartphone, whatever it is.
[01:12:16.820 --> 01:12:23.820]  It'll come up and section one is the same as it is in any code for the state or anything else.
[01:12:23.820 --> 01:12:25.820]  Section one gives you the definition.
[01:12:25.820 --> 01:12:29.820]  Definition of a person is the same as it is in all civil law.
[01:12:29.820 --> 01:12:41.820]  It says it's for a state trust, political subdivisions of the state, partnerships, individuals,
[01:12:41.820 --> 01:12:46.820]  just one of and any other legal entity.
[01:12:46.820 --> 01:12:48.820]  We're not legal entity.
[01:12:48.820 --> 01:12:50.820]  One created by the state.
[01:12:50.820 --> 01:12:51.820]  Correct.
[01:12:51.820 --> 01:12:52.820]  That's one to throw that out there.
[01:12:52.820 --> 01:12:53.820]  Correct.
[01:12:53.820 --> 01:12:54.820]  And every one of them.
[01:12:54.820 --> 01:12:55.820]  Doesn't miss a beat.
[01:12:55.820 --> 01:12:57.820]  I don't give a damn whose city you pull up.
[01:12:57.820 --> 01:12:58.820]  Right.
[01:12:58.820 --> 01:13:09.820]  Now the thing about that one of, remember it's one of the people acting as an agent for one of the other things listed.
[01:13:09.820 --> 01:13:10.820]  Gotcha.
[01:13:10.820 --> 01:13:11.820]  Okay.
[01:13:11.820 --> 01:13:12.820]  So just keep that in mind.
[01:13:12.820 --> 01:13:14.820]  But yes, you are absolutely right.
[01:13:14.820 --> 01:13:21.820]  But if you want to, but if you, if the layman reads that stat here, that ordinance, that definition in the ordinance,
[01:13:21.820 --> 01:13:24.820]  they won't understand what that actually means.
[01:13:24.820 --> 01:13:32.820]  All I did was tell him, if you read these things first, there is nothing else that ordinance can mean.
[01:13:32.820 --> 01:13:33.820]  Right.
[01:13:33.820 --> 01:13:34.820]  Right.
[01:13:34.820 --> 01:13:40.820]  Now, anyway, it's worked for a few people and I can pull that right like, oh yeah, that doesn't add up.
[01:13:40.820 --> 01:13:41.820]  I know it doesn't add up.
[01:13:41.820 --> 01:13:43.820]  That's the whole point.
[01:13:43.820 --> 01:13:44.820]  Exactly.
[01:13:44.820 --> 01:13:51.820]  And now, and we've gone through, you're the one who taught me how to read this, I don't even know why I'm saying it.
[01:13:51.820 --> 01:13:58.820]  Anyways, like you said, there is no other possible thing you can, and it's kind of like any constitution or anything else.
[01:13:58.820 --> 01:13:59.820]  It's negative law.
[01:13:59.820 --> 01:14:01.820]  If it ain't in here, it doesn't exist.
[01:14:01.820 --> 01:14:02.820]  Exactly.
[01:14:02.820 --> 01:14:05.820]  That's right. It does not apply if it's not written.
[01:14:05.820 --> 01:14:07.820]  End of discussion.
[01:14:07.820 --> 01:14:08.820]  End of discussion.
[01:14:08.820 --> 01:14:15.820]  So it's, and by human nature, I think we want to go backwards like, anyways.
[01:14:15.820 --> 01:14:16.820]  That's all.
[01:14:16.820 --> 01:14:24.820]  I just want to throw that out there as something that I have used to kind of help not break people's conditioning,
[01:14:24.820 --> 01:14:26.820]  but it's a hell of a starting point.
[01:14:26.820 --> 01:14:27.820]  You see this?
[01:14:27.820 --> 01:14:29.820]  Oh, there you go.
[01:14:29.820 --> 01:14:34.820]  Were you created by, are you a political subject of a legal entity?
[01:14:34.820 --> 01:14:36.820]  No, you're not a legal entity.
[01:14:36.820 --> 01:14:39.820]  Are you acting as an agent of a legal entity?
[01:14:39.820 --> 01:14:40.820]  Well, no.
[01:14:40.820 --> 01:14:41.820]  There you go.
[01:14:41.820 --> 01:14:42.820]  Oh, there you go.
[01:14:42.820 --> 01:14:43.820]  Good, good.
[01:14:43.820 --> 01:14:44.820]  Exactly.
[01:14:44.820 --> 01:14:45.820]  All right.
[01:14:45.820 --> 01:14:46.820]  I'm sorry.
[01:14:46.820 --> 01:14:52.820]  I just want to feed off of what he had said, and I'll hang back up the list and support.
[01:14:52.820 --> 01:14:54.820]  I didn't really see anything lined out.
[01:14:54.820 --> 01:14:56.820]  Out of a thousand things, I could ask you.
[01:14:56.820 --> 01:14:58.820]  I didn't have it lined out good.
[01:14:58.820 --> 01:14:59.820]  Sorry.
[01:14:59.820 --> 01:15:00.820]  That's okay.
[01:15:00.820 --> 01:15:01.820]  You did great.
[01:15:01.820 --> 01:15:02.820]  I appreciate it.
[01:15:02.820 --> 01:15:03.820]  Yes, sir.
[01:15:03.820 --> 01:15:04.820]  All right.
[01:15:04.820 --> 01:15:05.820]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:15:05.820 --> 01:15:06.820]  All right.
[01:15:06.820 --> 01:15:09.820]  Now, we had Clackamas, Oregon.
[01:15:09.820 --> 01:15:13.820]  I'm assuming, once again, this is Truth Raider.
[01:15:13.820 --> 01:15:14.820]  Bingo!
[01:15:14.820 --> 01:15:19.820]  More like Yahtzee, but okay.
[01:15:19.820 --> 01:15:20.820]  Yeah.
[01:15:20.820 --> 01:15:23.820]  No prize, but it's all right anyway.
[01:15:23.820 --> 01:15:24.820]  It's all good.
[01:15:24.820 --> 01:15:28.820]  I just want to call to say thank you, I'm glad to get this one.
[01:15:28.820 --> 01:15:35.820]  Finally, get this platform set up where we can all get together, share ideas, and expose
[01:15:35.820 --> 01:15:36.820]  this.
[01:15:36.820 --> 01:15:40.820]  No, now you got the wrong idea here, Raider.
[01:15:40.820 --> 01:15:45.820]  The class is not for sharing ideas.
[01:15:45.820 --> 01:15:49.820]  The class is to get everybody working toward the same idea.
[01:15:49.820 --> 01:15:50.820]  All right.
[01:15:50.820 --> 01:15:51.820]  All right.
[01:15:51.820 --> 01:15:53.820]  I was hoping we'd be able to meet.
[01:15:53.820 --> 01:15:57.820]  It's awfully lonely doing this for seven years up here.
[01:15:57.820 --> 01:15:58.820]  Really?
[01:15:58.820 --> 01:15:59.820]  Try doing it for 13.
[01:15:59.820 --> 01:16:01.820]  Then tell me about it.
[01:16:01.820 --> 01:16:02.820]  Yeah.
[01:16:02.820 --> 01:16:03.820]  Well, I'm halfway there.
[01:16:03.820 --> 01:16:11.820]  By that time, I'll be able to be an expert at this.
[01:16:11.820 --> 01:16:12.820]  Yeah.
[01:16:12.820 --> 01:16:17.420]  But that said, that email you sent me with the address in it that you wanted me to send
[01:16:17.420 --> 01:16:21.740]  your notice to, the email address bounce back saying it does not work.
[01:16:21.740 --> 01:16:24.740]  Send me the email again, please.
[01:16:24.740 --> 01:16:30.740]  Well, yeah, it's not true 321, I think I preface that.
[01:16:30.740 --> 01:16:35.740]  Don't say it on the air, just send me the correct address.
[01:16:35.740 --> 01:16:36.740]  Yeah.
[01:16:36.740 --> 01:16:37.740]  Okay.
[01:16:37.740 --> 01:16:39.740]  No, I got it.
[01:16:39.740 --> 01:16:40.740]  I got your email.
[01:16:40.740 --> 01:16:41.740]  I got it.
[01:16:41.740 --> 01:16:43.740]  Then why did it say it didn't work?
[01:16:43.740 --> 01:16:44.740]  I don't know.
[01:16:44.740 --> 01:16:47.740]  You must send us the 21 on the other one.
[01:16:47.740 --> 01:16:50.740]  No, I've only got one email address I put in for you.
[01:16:50.740 --> 01:16:53.740]  All right, anyway, hang on, I got to take a break here.
[01:16:53.740 --> 01:17:22.740]  All right, folks, y'all hang on, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:17:23.740 --> 01:17:49.740]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:17:49.740 --> 01:18:18.740]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:18:18.740 --> 01:18:44.740]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:18:44.740 --> 01:19:10.740]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:19:14.740 --> 01:19:43.740]  All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[01:19:44.740 --> 01:20:04.740]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:20:04.740 --> 01:20:12.740]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984 if you want to call in and talk.
[01:20:12.740 --> 01:20:13.740]  All right.
[01:20:13.740 --> 01:20:17.740]  Right now, we are still talking to Truth Raider.
[01:20:17.740 --> 01:20:21.740]  Raider, what else you got?
[01:20:21.740 --> 01:20:25.740]  Just said June 24th, 2021, I received it at 11.59.
[01:20:25.740 --> 01:20:28.740]  Okay, to all the folks who wish to purchase it.
[01:20:28.740 --> 01:20:30.740]  I don't need to play by play on the email.
[01:20:30.740 --> 01:20:32.740]  I'm just, okay.
[01:20:32.740 --> 01:20:42.740]  The thing is, Raider, that I sent a notice from Outlook for the scheduled meeting and it bounced back.
[01:20:42.740 --> 01:20:51.740]  So please send me the email address again so I can compare it to the one I've got and make sure it's right.
[01:20:51.740 --> 01:20:52.740]  Okay, we'll do.
[01:20:52.740 --> 01:20:55.740]  But I did receive it in the meantime, so that's the good news.
[01:20:55.740 --> 01:20:58.740]  Well, you should have gotten three.
[01:20:58.740 --> 01:21:00.740]  Okay, I just got one.
[01:21:00.740 --> 01:21:02.740]  Well, there you go.
[01:21:02.740 --> 01:21:06.740]  You should have got one for tomorrow night, Wednesday night, and Thursday.
[01:21:06.740 --> 01:21:14.740]  Tomorrow night and Wednesday night are for checking things and making sure that you can get connected, see here and talk.
[01:21:14.740 --> 01:21:18.740]  Okay, Thursday is the actual class.
[01:21:18.740 --> 01:21:19.740]  Right.
[01:21:19.740 --> 01:21:20.740]  Right.
[01:21:20.740 --> 01:21:21.740]  And I can't wait.
[01:21:21.740 --> 01:21:24.740]  In seven long years, I can't wait to be exonerated.
[01:21:24.740 --> 01:21:27.740]  I've been tired of being ridiculed, called crazy.
[01:21:27.740 --> 01:21:28.740]  Hey, what's the definition of crazy?
[01:21:28.740 --> 01:21:30.740]  Doing the same thing over and over and over again.
[01:21:30.740 --> 01:21:32.740]  I think you're going to get different results.
[01:21:32.740 --> 01:21:35.740]  That's what they keep, they keep spitting out at me.
[01:21:35.740 --> 01:21:41.740]  So I got to put them in their place, get exonerated, and prove that I had the right of liberty to love the motion.
[01:21:41.740 --> 01:21:42.740]  Well.
[01:21:42.740 --> 01:21:43.740]  Okay, that's...
[01:21:43.740 --> 01:21:44.740]  Keep working.
[01:21:44.740 --> 01:21:45.740]  I'm coming back.
[01:21:45.740 --> 01:21:49.740]  Yeah, it's the shot in the arm I've been waiting for for a long time.
[01:21:49.740 --> 01:21:50.740]  All right.
[01:21:50.740 --> 01:21:51.740]  Anything else?
[01:21:51.740 --> 01:21:52.740]  Yeah.
[01:21:52.740 --> 01:21:56.740]  Yeah, you were discussing real quick about the definition of person.
[01:21:56.740 --> 01:21:58.740]  Just in the last call there, we were talking about the...
[01:21:58.740 --> 01:22:07.740]  No, we were talking about the definition of person as they are specific to almost every ordinance in every city across the U.S.
[01:22:07.740 --> 01:22:08.740]  Right.
[01:22:08.740 --> 01:22:09.740]  Right.
[01:22:09.740 --> 01:22:18.740]  Somebody who is an agent of, or somebody who is of, he said, whatever it is, some type of official capacity.
[01:22:18.740 --> 01:22:19.740]  That right?
[01:22:19.740 --> 01:22:24.740]  Or some sort of legal capacity associated with a legal entity.
[01:22:24.740 --> 01:22:25.740]  Yeah.
[01:22:25.740 --> 01:22:28.740]  Okay, gotcha.
[01:22:28.740 --> 01:22:29.740]  That's what it says in the statute.
[01:22:29.740 --> 01:22:36.740]  It always mentions the word person, especially in the vehicle code, and we have here, a person shall not say this, an officer shall not do that.
[01:22:36.740 --> 01:22:44.740]  It's all related back and forth to official person, you know, of official capacity of some sort, in a legal sense.
[01:22:44.740 --> 01:22:45.740]  Okay?
[01:22:45.740 --> 01:22:48.740]  Well, in that relationship, it's a legal capacity.
[01:22:48.740 --> 01:22:52.740]  The person is a legal capacity.
[01:22:52.740 --> 01:22:53.740]  Right.
[01:22:53.740 --> 01:22:54.740]  Right.
[01:22:54.740 --> 01:22:55.740]  It's not a straw man.
[01:22:55.740 --> 01:22:56.740]  It's not any of that crap.
[01:22:56.740 --> 01:23:07.740]  It's a legal capacity that an individual must assume the duties and responsibilities for in order for it to perform its necessary function.
[01:23:07.740 --> 01:23:08.740]  Right.
[01:23:08.740 --> 01:23:15.740]  What the state is failing to prove is that the individual ever assumed that legal capacity knowingly and willingly.
[01:23:15.740 --> 01:23:19.740]  The state is pushing them into it by force.
[01:23:19.740 --> 01:23:20.740]  Right.
[01:23:20.740 --> 01:23:31.740]  And by doing that, they had made their omissions in the statutes in the beginning to make everything look universally applicable to every individual or person.
[01:23:31.740 --> 01:23:37.740]  They've tried, but there are certain things that make it impossible to do completely.
[01:23:37.740 --> 01:23:38.740]  Right.
[01:23:38.740 --> 01:23:43.740]  You just have to know how to find them, read them, and understand them.
[01:23:43.740 --> 01:23:52.740]  Yep. When they put it in their face, show them to them and make them prove that we're in that capacity.
[01:23:52.740 --> 01:23:53.740]  Okay.
[01:23:53.740 --> 01:23:54.740]  Anything else?
[01:23:54.740 --> 01:23:55.740]  All right.
[01:23:55.740 --> 01:23:56.740]  No, dad will do it.
[01:23:56.740 --> 01:24:00.740]  I'll say thank you and I'll be over to connect with you in the next couple of days.
[01:24:00.740 --> 01:24:01.740]  Can't wait.
[01:24:01.740 --> 01:24:02.740]  Oh, okay.
[01:24:02.740 --> 01:24:03.740]  Get this done.
[01:24:03.740 --> 01:24:04.740]  All right.
[01:24:04.740 --> 01:24:05.740]  All right.
[01:24:05.740 --> 01:24:06.740]  Well, thank you again.
[01:24:06.740 --> 01:24:07.740]  Talk to you.
[01:24:07.740 --> 01:24:08.740]  All right.
[01:24:08.740 --> 01:24:09.740]  Bye-bye.
[01:24:09.740 --> 01:24:10.740]  Bye.
[01:24:10.740 --> 01:24:11.740]  All right.
[01:24:11.740 --> 01:24:14.740]  Next caller up is Bob in California.
[01:24:14.740 --> 01:24:16.740]  Bob, what do you have?
[01:24:16.740 --> 01:24:23.740]  Well, I wanted to ask you the situation.
[01:24:23.740 --> 01:24:38.740]  I was on an overpass and we've been hanging anti-vax or not anti-vax, but informational abandon.
[01:24:38.740 --> 01:24:41.740]  We've been doing this for about six months now.
[01:24:41.740 --> 01:24:45.740]  And last Friday, we got a business proposal.
[01:24:45.740 --> 01:24:46.740]  Okay.
[01:24:46.740 --> 01:24:49.740]  Bob, are you moving around while you're talking to me?
[01:24:49.740 --> 01:24:50.740]  No.
[01:24:50.740 --> 01:24:57.740]  Are you near anything electrical, like an air conditioner or a fluorescent lamp or something
[01:24:57.740 --> 01:24:58.740]  like that?
[01:24:58.740 --> 01:25:00.740]  I'm going to get to a better place.
[01:25:00.740 --> 01:25:01.740]  Okay.
[01:25:01.740 --> 01:25:02.740]  There you go.
[01:25:02.740 --> 01:25:03.740]  That's a whole lot clearer.
[01:25:03.740 --> 01:25:04.740]  You're not breaking up every time you talk.
[01:25:04.740 --> 01:25:05.740]  All right.
[01:25:05.740 --> 01:25:08.740]  Let me see if I got you so far and I'll let you continue.
[01:25:08.740 --> 01:25:15.740]  You were on an overpass, engaged in the exercise of protest by hanging anti-vaccination banners.
[01:25:15.740 --> 01:25:17.740]  Is that what I've got right so far?
[01:25:17.740 --> 01:25:18.740]  Do I have that right?
[01:25:18.740 --> 01:25:19.740]  Yes.
[01:25:19.740 --> 01:25:22.740]  And you've been doing it for about six months?
[01:25:22.740 --> 01:25:23.740]  Yes.
[01:25:23.740 --> 01:25:25.740]  And you're in California?
[01:25:25.740 --> 01:25:26.740]  Yes.
[01:25:26.740 --> 01:25:32.740]  So we attach it to the chain link fence with bungee cords.
[01:25:32.740 --> 01:25:37.740]  On the inside of the chain link fence, not the outside where it hangs out into open traffic.
[01:25:37.740 --> 01:25:38.740]  Right.
[01:25:38.740 --> 01:25:46.740]  So, you know, we get about half fingers and half thumbs up, you know, people driving by.
[01:25:46.740 --> 01:25:47.740]  Right.
[01:25:47.740 --> 01:25:54.740]  So apparently the highway patrol had had a few phone calls about, you know, people complaining.
[01:25:54.740 --> 01:26:04.740]  So when the officer approached, he said, you know, someone's going to have to identify
[01:26:04.740 --> 01:26:10.740]  their cells or I'm going to give you all a citation.
[01:26:10.740 --> 01:26:11.740]  And...
[01:26:11.740 --> 01:26:16.740]  Is that the first thing you said when he got there?
[01:26:16.740 --> 01:26:17.740]  Yeah.
[01:26:17.740 --> 01:26:18.740]  Okay.
[01:26:18.740 --> 01:26:29.740]  So we asked what the, you know, what the problem was and he said, you're violating penal code
[01:26:29.740 --> 01:26:32.740]  594.
[01:26:32.740 --> 01:26:38.740]  And so we said, well, what is 594 saying?
[01:26:38.740 --> 01:26:40.740]  He said, well, you've got an iPhone.
[01:26:40.740 --> 01:26:42.740]  Look it up.
[01:26:42.740 --> 01:26:45.740]  So it's graffiti.
[01:26:45.740 --> 01:26:52.740]  So he's saying he's going to have to give us a citation for a graffiti.
[01:26:52.740 --> 01:27:04.740]  So I guess what I'm asking is, can he come up and quote a law that has nothing to do with
[01:27:04.740 --> 01:27:07.740]  the activity we're involved in?
[01:27:07.740 --> 01:27:10.740]  Well, he's trying to make up something to make you stop.
[01:27:10.740 --> 01:27:14.740]  So he doesn't get sent out there to investigate what people are complaining about.
[01:27:14.740 --> 01:27:22.740]  However, 594 of the California Penal Code says, malicious mischief.
[01:27:22.740 --> 01:27:30.740]  Does it say graffiti?
[01:27:30.740 --> 01:27:39.740]  Oh, maybe I've got the wrong number here that I just quoted, but I thought it was, well,
[01:27:39.740 --> 01:27:43.740]  what's malicious mischief?
[01:27:43.740 --> 01:27:49.740]  Every person who maliciously commits any of the following acts with respect to any real
[01:27:49.740 --> 01:27:55.740]  or personal property, not his or her own, in cases other than those specified by state law,
[01:27:55.740 --> 01:27:57.740]  is guilty of vandalism.
[01:27:57.740 --> 01:28:03.740]  Defaces with graffiti or other inscribed material damages, destroys.
[01:28:03.740 --> 01:28:04.740]  Okay.
[01:28:04.740 --> 01:28:06.740]  So, okay.
[01:28:06.740 --> 01:28:12.740]  The question is, is how can he claim that you defaced property that was not your own when
[01:28:12.740 --> 01:28:20.740]  everything you wrote was on your banner material and not the fence?
[01:28:20.740 --> 01:28:23.740]  That's what I'm getting at, exactly.
[01:28:23.740 --> 01:28:26.740]  What is he alleging you damaged?
[01:28:26.740 --> 01:28:29.740]  What is he alleging you destroyed?
[01:28:29.740 --> 01:28:32.740]  He's not alleging anything like that.
[01:28:32.740 --> 01:28:34.740]  He's just saying that.
[01:28:34.740 --> 01:28:36.740]  No, you get, okay.
[01:28:36.740 --> 01:28:38.740]  This is how you ask him.
[01:28:38.740 --> 01:28:43.740]  I'm trying to help you understand what you need to say in response to them saying something
[01:28:43.740 --> 01:28:44.740]  like this to you.
[01:28:44.740 --> 01:28:48.740]  That's why you need to be able to read and comprehend what these statutes are actually
[01:28:48.740 --> 01:28:49.740]  talking about.
[01:28:49.740 --> 01:28:50.740]  Okay.
[01:28:50.740 --> 01:28:51.740]  Okay.
[01:28:51.740 --> 01:28:56.740]  You went straight to number one, which mentions graffiti, but it's not the offense.
[01:28:56.740 --> 01:29:01.740]  It's one of the elements that constitute the offense.
[01:29:01.740 --> 01:29:06.740]  The offense is malicious mischief.
[01:29:06.740 --> 01:29:07.740]  Okay.
[01:29:07.740 --> 01:29:12.740]  It has to meet the criteria set forth right here.
[01:29:12.740 --> 01:29:15.740]  In the elements.
[01:29:15.740 --> 01:29:16.740]  Huh?
[01:29:16.740 --> 01:29:18.740]  In the elements.
[01:29:18.740 --> 01:29:19.740]  Those are the elements.
[01:29:19.740 --> 01:29:20.740]  That's what I'm talking about.
[01:29:20.740 --> 01:29:24.740]  These, the things set forth are the elements of the offense.
[01:29:24.740 --> 01:29:30.740]  And right here it says, with respect to any real or personal property, not his or her
[01:29:30.740 --> 01:29:31.740]  own.
[01:29:31.740 --> 01:29:32.740]  Okay.
[01:29:32.740 --> 01:29:36.740]  And since what you're doing is considered political speech, they can't put anything
[01:29:36.740 --> 01:29:37.740]  down.
[01:29:37.740 --> 01:29:40.740]  They can't prevent you from hanging it in public.
[01:29:40.740 --> 01:29:46.740]  Now they can prevent you from tagging it onto a building wall, but not from slapping up
[01:29:46.740 --> 01:29:48.740]  a poster or a flyer.
[01:29:48.740 --> 01:29:50.740]  You see what I'm saying?
[01:29:50.740 --> 01:29:51.740]  Yes.
[01:29:51.740 --> 01:29:52.740]  So hang on just a second.
[01:29:52.740 --> 01:29:55.740]  Let's get this break out of the way and we'll finish this on the other side.
[01:29:55.740 --> 01:29:56.740]  All right?
[01:29:56.740 --> 01:29:57.740]  Sounds good.
[01:29:57.740 --> 01:29:58.740]  All right.
[01:29:58.740 --> 01:29:59.740]  Hang on.
[01:29:59.740 --> 01:30:04.740]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security
[01:30:04.740 --> 01:30:06.740]  number, and date of birth.
[01:30:06.740 --> 01:30:08.740]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:08.740 --> 01:30:37.740]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:39.740 --> 01:31:00.740]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:00.740 --> 01:31:22.740]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht.
[01:31:31.740 --> 01:31:36.740]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.740 --> 01:31:38.740]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.740 --> 01:31:43.740]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.740 --> 01:31:47.740]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:47.740 --> 01:31:49.740]  force responders have died.
[01:31:49.740 --> 01:31:50.740]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.740 --> 01:31:51.740]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.740 --> 01:31:52.740]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:52.740 --> 01:31:53.740]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.740 --> 01:31:55.740]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.740 --> 01:31:58.740]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.740 --> 01:32:01.740]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:29.740 --> 01:32:38.740]  Call 512-992-8745 or go to HillCountryHomeImprovments.com.
[01:32:38.740 --> 01:32:41.740]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off.
[01:32:41.740 --> 01:32:46.740]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos radio network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.740 --> 01:32:51.740]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:51.740 --> 01:32:57.740]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.740 --> 01:32:59.980]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.980 --> 01:33:01.980]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.980 --> 01:33:28.980]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:28.980 --> 01:33:33.980]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:33.980 --> 01:33:39.980]  Alright, we have things on a roll right now. We are talking with Bob in California.
[01:33:39.980 --> 01:33:43.980]  So let's get back to him. Alright Bob, let's continue.
[01:33:43.980 --> 01:33:48.980]  Okay, so since you're talking about political speech,
[01:33:48.980 --> 01:33:54.980]  everything he was saying is a violation of your rights to engage in that speech.
[01:33:54.980 --> 01:34:01.980]  Okay, so that's really all you got to say. This is protected political speech.
[01:34:01.980 --> 01:34:05.980]  Nothing is being defaced, damaged, or destroyed.
[01:34:05.980 --> 01:34:10.980]  Everything is on our property. We are simply displaying it in a public space
[01:34:10.980 --> 01:34:16.980]  as we are entitled to do under our right to engage in political speech publicly.
[01:34:16.980 --> 01:34:25.980]  Okay, yeah, that sounds about what I was thinking.
[01:34:25.980 --> 01:34:33.980]  Okay, so my advice is print out this statute. Go find this statute and print it out.
[01:34:33.980 --> 01:34:38.980]  Write the notes on it that I just gave you about political speech
[01:34:38.980 --> 01:34:42.980]  and what he's accusing you of specifically in relation to this statute.
[01:34:42.980 --> 01:34:48.980]  Make him point it out and make sure that from now on when you engage in this activity,
[01:34:48.980 --> 01:34:54.980]  somebody present is audio and video recording always and forever.
[01:34:54.980 --> 01:34:59.980]  Anytime a public official is approaching you or even looking like he's going to approach you,
[01:34:59.980 --> 01:35:03.980]  start audio and video recording before they even get there.
[01:35:03.980 --> 01:35:09.980]  We've got that. I've got a video of his whole spiel.
[01:35:09.980 --> 01:35:16.980]  Right, so now you can go file a criminal complaint against him with his department.
[01:35:16.980 --> 01:35:20.980]  And what do you think the complaint would be?
[01:35:20.980 --> 01:35:25.980]  The complaint is that he knowingly and willfully attempted to accuse you of a crime
[01:35:25.980 --> 01:35:31.980]  he knew you hadn't committed and violated your right to engage in protected political speech in public.
[01:35:31.980 --> 01:35:35.980]  That sounds real good.
[01:35:35.980 --> 01:35:41.980]  Okay, do you have another caller here?
[01:35:41.980 --> 01:35:45.980]  I've got one more, but I've got enough time to get something else if you got it.
[01:35:45.980 --> 01:35:56.980]  Okay, so now we get a couple of characters come up with video cameras and get in our face.
[01:35:56.980 --> 01:35:58.980]  This is after...
[01:35:58.980 --> 01:36:00.980]  When you say characters, who are we talking about?
[01:36:00.980 --> 01:36:05.980]  Well, just two people that came up and they started to...
[01:36:05.980 --> 01:36:11.980]  Who here has vaccines and, you know, just...
[01:36:11.980 --> 01:36:14.980]  Just basically harassing.
[01:36:14.980 --> 01:36:16.980]  So I looked that one up.
[01:36:16.980 --> 01:36:24.980]  They were violating penal code 403, which was disturbing an assembly.
[01:36:24.980 --> 01:36:30.980]  Well, what is the definition of an assembly in relation to that statute?
[01:36:30.980 --> 01:36:37.980]  Don't presume that's what it means just because you read it, but you didn't look up the definitions for all the terms you did it.
[01:36:37.980 --> 01:36:42.980]  What does the law define as an assembly?
[01:36:42.980 --> 01:36:44.980]  Okay, well, I'll have to look that up.
[01:36:44.980 --> 01:36:45.980]  Right.
[01:36:45.980 --> 01:36:47.980]  I looked up the word assembly.
[01:36:47.980 --> 01:36:50.980]  I didn't look up their definition of assembly.
[01:36:50.980 --> 01:36:52.980]  You always look up their definition.
[01:36:52.980 --> 01:36:59.980]  If you're reading something from a law, you find the definition in the law that supports what you're reading.
[01:36:59.980 --> 01:37:01.980]  Not anywhere else do you look.
[01:37:01.980 --> 01:37:07.980]  You always look in the law relative to what you're reading.
[01:37:07.980 --> 01:37:12.980]  And not all those words are defined in those laws.
[01:37:12.980 --> 01:37:20.980]  No, they're not defined locally, but they could very well be defined somewhere else in like the government code.
[01:37:20.980 --> 01:37:29.980]  If you've got a separate government code, it may define it there and apply that definition across all other codes.
[01:37:29.980 --> 01:37:31.980]  I see.
[01:37:31.980 --> 01:37:32.980]  Okay.
[01:37:32.980 --> 01:37:36.980]  That's what's called the general statutory definition.
[01:37:36.980 --> 01:37:49.980]  Whereas the local statute, if it creates one of its own, that's the local and specific definition that will supersede the general unless the local or specific says the general is controlling.
[01:37:49.980 --> 01:37:50.980]  You get it?
[01:37:50.980 --> 01:37:51.980]  Okay.
[01:37:51.980 --> 01:37:52.980]  Yes, sir.
[01:37:52.980 --> 01:37:53.980]  All right.
[01:37:53.980 --> 01:37:54.980]  All right.
[01:37:54.980 --> 01:38:00.980]  I'll look into that and give you a call back on another day.
[01:38:00.980 --> 01:38:01.980]  All right.
[01:38:01.980 --> 01:38:05.980]  Well, I wish y'all luck and like I say, keep going, plugging it away.
[01:38:05.980 --> 01:38:07.980]  Don't let them stop you if you can.
[01:38:07.980 --> 01:38:09.980]  I won't.
[01:38:09.980 --> 01:38:24.980]  Another thing about the, I saw on the rule of law website, can I go on there to, and I can go there to enroll in the online class you're going to have?
[01:38:24.980 --> 01:38:25.980]  Correct.
[01:38:25.980 --> 01:38:31.980]  It's conducted in Zoom, which is an online meeting space, and you can do that.
[01:38:31.980 --> 01:38:35.980]  You don't have to install anything on your phone or your computer.
[01:38:35.980 --> 01:38:37.980]  You can literally get there through a web browser.
[01:38:37.980 --> 01:38:53.980]  But if you want to subscribe, I need you to email me a username that you're going to use on the connection and an email address that I can send your connection, your meeting information to after you've activated your subscription.
[01:38:53.980 --> 01:38:54.980]  Okay.
[01:38:54.980 --> 01:38:55.980]  I'll do that.
[01:38:55.980 --> 01:38:56.980]  Okay.
[01:38:56.980 --> 01:38:57.980]  All right.
[01:38:57.980 --> 01:38:58.980]  Eddie, thanks a lot.
[01:38:58.980 --> 01:38:59.980]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:59.980 --> 01:39:00.980]  Thank you.
[01:39:00.980 --> 01:39:01.980]  You're welcome.
[01:39:01.980 --> 01:39:03.980]  All right.
[01:39:03.980 --> 01:39:07.980]  Now we got that done, I got enough time here to start with Chris and Colorado.
[01:39:07.980 --> 01:39:10.980]  All right, Chris, what do you got?
[01:39:10.980 --> 01:39:19.980]  Eddie, the previous callers, previous callers question prompted me to call in because I had a similar question, not similar, but related.
[01:39:19.980 --> 01:39:20.980]  Okay.
[01:39:20.980 --> 01:39:27.980]  So when a police officer makes a false statement, is there a term for that?
[01:39:27.980 --> 01:39:32.980]  And what do you think about holding them accountable since they're so cavalier?
[01:39:32.980 --> 01:39:38.980]  It depends upon the conditions, circumstances, and context in which he makes the false statement.
[01:39:38.980 --> 01:39:43.980]  The Supreme Court has ruled that cops can lie to the public, blatantly so.
[01:39:43.980 --> 01:39:47.980]  In almost any kind of situation, they can lie.
[01:39:47.980 --> 01:39:54.980]  It's considered a valuable investigative tool according to the courts.
[01:39:54.980 --> 01:39:55.980]  Okay.
[01:39:55.980 --> 01:40:09.980]  So the only time they cannot lie to you is when they're doing it under oath, on the stand, or in an official documents that require a signature.
[01:40:09.980 --> 01:40:11.980]  Got that?
[01:40:11.980 --> 01:40:18.980]  Those are the three primary areas where they cannot be lying when they do it.
[01:40:18.980 --> 01:40:19.980]  Okay.
[01:40:19.980 --> 01:40:21.980]  Well, that's perjury anyway, right?
[01:40:21.980 --> 01:40:27.980]  Well, if they do it on the stand under oath, it's perjury or aggravated perjury.
[01:40:27.980 --> 01:40:31.980]  If it's, I'm sorry, aggravated perjury is under oath.
[01:40:31.980 --> 01:40:36.980]  Perjury is when it's not under oath.
[01:40:36.980 --> 01:40:41.980]  Because perjury is not limited strictly to open court.
[01:40:41.980 --> 01:40:47.980]  Perjury can also exist in an official document that they sign that makes false statements.
[01:40:47.980 --> 01:40:57.980]  But usually the perjury is waived because it's a lesser offense than actually falsifying a government record or making false statements in an official record.
[01:40:57.980 --> 01:41:05.980]  Those are much more egregious crimes and they usually will supersede the perjury.
[01:41:05.980 --> 01:41:06.980]  Sure.
[01:41:06.980 --> 01:41:07.980]  Okay.
[01:41:07.980 --> 01:41:16.980]  Well, the previous example the guy called the police officer showed up and he started quoting law and it wasn't even accurate.
[01:41:16.980 --> 01:41:22.980]  Who is that allowed by the Supreme Court or is there a way to hold them accountable for that type of thing?
[01:41:22.980 --> 01:41:24.980]  That's false arrest, you know?
[01:41:24.980 --> 01:41:30.980]  So that's my, I don't know if that's what it's called, but they're using a law to make a false arrest.
[01:41:30.980 --> 01:41:38.980]  They're misquoting a law or to make a false citation or something like that, you know?
[01:41:38.980 --> 01:41:39.980]  Yeah.
[01:41:39.980 --> 01:41:44.980]  If they can make false statements of law, they can tell you they've got evidence they don't have.
[01:41:44.980 --> 01:41:47.980]  They can tell you they've got witnesses they don't have.
[01:41:47.980 --> 01:41:50.980]  They can tell you they got you on video even when they don't.
[01:41:50.980 --> 01:41:51.980]  They've audio recorded you.
[01:41:51.980 --> 01:41:52.980]  They've got a witness.
[01:41:52.980 --> 01:41:59.980]  They can tell you anything they want as long as it's not done in the forms I told you.
[01:41:59.980 --> 01:42:00.980]  Wow.
[01:42:00.980 --> 01:42:05.980]  Well, that kind of rubs me the wrong way.
[01:42:05.980 --> 01:42:17.980]  It rubs everybody the wrong way and it gives them way too much power to convince innocent people that they've got evidence against them that the innocent person didn't even know could be used as evidence.
[01:42:17.980 --> 01:42:26.980]  And in fact, they're not guilty of anything, but the cop has made them feel like, well, if I don't do something here and comply, they're going to make it all worse for me.
[01:42:26.980 --> 01:42:30.980]  They prey on people's ignorance when they lie and they know it.
[01:42:30.980 --> 01:42:35.980]  It sounds like a interrogation method there though, like you see in the movies.
[01:42:35.980 --> 01:42:38.980]  That's exactly what it is.
[01:42:38.980 --> 01:42:51.980]  But see, that's why they can do it in that situation, but they cannot do it when it comes to actually taking the stand, putting their name on a document or a report or something official, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:42:51.980 --> 01:42:56.980]  If they do it then, they're in deep voodoo provided you can prove it.
[01:42:56.980 --> 01:43:01.980]  So speaking of perjury, I've been trying to dig on this one and I actually spoke to an attorney.
[01:43:01.980 --> 01:43:04.980]  So there's this thing in Chicago for federal court.
[01:43:04.980 --> 01:43:13.980]  They have a pro-state legal assistance, which is nice in certain respects, but I get a lot of different opinions depending on the different lawyers I'm speaking to.
[01:43:13.980 --> 01:43:27.980]  The last lawyer I talked to, I'm like, you know, I'm drafting some things here and trying to get some legitimate claims and I said, I've got a record of a company lying to an alderman, which, you know, is a government official who requested the information to him.
[01:43:27.980 --> 01:43:34.980]  And they not only forged a photo, but they also lied in their email and asked, is that perjury?
[01:43:34.980 --> 01:43:35.980]  And the lawyer says, no.
[01:43:35.980 --> 01:43:39.980]  I asked another state attorney and they wouldn't answer it.
[01:43:39.980 --> 01:43:43.980]  I said, well, what do you think it is? And that's the lawyer I think he thinks, well, and they didn't deny it.
[01:43:43.980 --> 01:43:45.980]  They were kind of trying to get the read between the lines.
[01:43:45.980 --> 01:43:49.980]  But anyway, I guess I'll finish when we get back.
[01:43:49.980 --> 01:43:53.980]  Hang on just a second. Let me take this break and you can finish it up afterwards, okay?
[01:43:53.980 --> 01:43:54.980]  Okay.
[01:43:54.980 --> 01:43:59.980]  All right, folks. We'll be right back for the last segment of the show, y'all now.
[01:43:59.980 --> 01:44:04.980]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:44:04.980 --> 01:44:13.980]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method. Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:44:13.980 --> 01:44:19.980]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:44:19.980 --> 01:44:25.980]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:44:25.980 --> 01:44:28.980]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:44:28.980 --> 01:44:32.980]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:44:32.980 --> 01:44:37.980]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:37.980 --> 01:44:40.980]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.980 --> 01:44:48.980]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com.
[01:44:48.980 --> 01:44:59.980]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:44:59.980 --> 01:45:03.980]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.980 --> 01:45:14.980]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.980 --> 01:45:18.980]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.980 --> 01:45:22.980]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.980 --> 01:45:27.980]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[01:45:27.980 --> 01:45:33.980]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.980 --> 01:45:42.980]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.980 --> 01:45:51.980]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.980 --> 01:46:00.980]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:00.980 --> 01:46:23.980]  All right folks, this is rule of law radio Monday night show. We are host Eddie Craig. We are now in the last segment of our show for tonight.
[01:46:23.980 --> 01:46:32.980]  We are currently talking to Chris in Colorado and Chris says something he is asking us about. So Chris, please continue.
[01:46:32.980 --> 01:46:42.980]  Okay, so I'm trying to get a clear definition of perjury and I just looked it up online and I wish my computer could cooperate here.
[01:46:42.980 --> 01:46:50.980]  So originally it says it's a crime committed by being under oath in a judicial proceeding.
[01:46:50.980 --> 01:47:01.980]  But I'm finding another definition right here that says crime and detention line are being duly sworn to tell truth by a notary public clerk or other official.
[01:47:01.980 --> 01:47:10.980]  Correct. You can commit perjury by signing your name on a document you know to be false while swearing that everything in it is true.
[01:47:10.980 --> 01:47:21.980]  Okay, because when you sign it in front of that notary there's almost always an oath pledging that the facts or everything written in this document is true and correct.
[01:47:21.980 --> 01:47:28.980]  It's the same thing with a contract. You can commit perjury on a contract if it has to be done under oath.
[01:47:28.980 --> 01:47:40.980]  But what I was telling you is that if that document is an official document, perjury will be supplanted by the much more egregious offenses I told you of before.
[01:47:40.980 --> 01:48:00.980]  Right. Well, I'm going off, I'm not, this is unrelated to the police officer situation. This is an actual company, so a state official Alderman, I don't know where that falls in the totem pole, but an Alderman in Chicago asked for information and asked for, you know,
[01:48:00.980 --> 01:48:14.980]  that basically was acquired by law and that's what they asked for. And the party, the company submitted falsified images and then made a false statement in an email to defer that request.
[01:48:14.980 --> 01:48:22.980]  Okay. Then most likely there's a much higher level crime they're guilty of than perjury.
[01:48:22.980 --> 01:48:42.980]  Oh, yeah, for sure. Because that right there constitutes fraud and if these are documents are being used for an official purpose and Illinois has a law against tampering with or fabricating or stating known false facts in an official document
[01:48:42.980 --> 01:48:47.980]  or proceeding, then they would be guilty of those offenses.
[01:48:47.980 --> 01:48:59.980]  That's what I'm trying to find. So I've got them on consumer fraud, I've got them on fraud, but I'm trying to just back up the claim so it's just overwhelming and I'm trying to find that specific.
[01:48:59.980 --> 01:49:10.980]  Perjury was, you know, I'm a layman, I'm pretty green at this. So perjury was the first one I came up with, but what you just said would actually prompt me to dig a little deeper in some laws with that wordage there.
[01:49:10.980 --> 01:49:19.980]  Yeah, your perjury, perjury will be let go to cover a much larger crime if it exists.
[01:49:19.980 --> 01:49:31.980]  Okay, because they're not going to charge them with perjury if the elements of perjury in that instance would be identical to the elements of falsifying an official document under oath.
[01:49:31.980 --> 01:49:33.980]  You see what I'm saying?
[01:49:33.980 --> 01:49:46.980]  Yeah. Perjury gets superseded as a misdemeanor or an arrestable or jailable misdemeanor for a felony conviction on tampering with a government document.
[01:49:46.980 --> 01:49:55.980]  Okay. Well, this is just civil on my part. Like I said, I think last week I can't get anybody in that city to do anything legally for criminal activity.
[01:49:55.980 --> 01:50:05.980]  So I'm alone here in the civil action, so I'm just trying to stack the claims up civilly for, you know, and just make it apparent that this is what they do and on just every level.
[01:50:05.980 --> 01:50:16.980]  Well, when you're doing that, when you have multiple offenses that are comprised of the same basic elements, always pick your big one and drop the little one.
[01:50:16.980 --> 01:50:19.980]  Okay.
[01:50:19.980 --> 01:50:31.980]  Because remember, you can't convict somebody of an offense twice for the same event. Get it? You would be invoking a double jeopardy protection for them by trying to get them on both of them.
[01:50:31.980 --> 01:50:38.980]  You could go after one or the other, but never both if they're from the same event and they involve more or less the same circumstances.
[01:50:38.980 --> 01:50:45.980]  Okay. Well, then I won't use perjury. I'll just name, I'll just mention what they did and I'll keep it under the fraud claim.
[01:50:45.980 --> 01:50:46.980]  Yes.
[01:50:46.980 --> 01:50:49.980]  That should be big enough. Okay. Yeah. That's good.
[01:50:49.980 --> 01:50:55.980]  That would, that in my opinion would probably be the best course of action.
[01:50:55.980 --> 01:51:07.980]  Okay. Now if, if these are, but again, now if these are documents that they are required to provide you under oath, then these are considered official documents.
[01:51:07.980 --> 01:51:13.980]  If they're required to be done under oath because that oath would have had to have been delivered in front of a notary, would it not?
[01:51:13.980 --> 01:51:16.980]  There's a notary signature on the document they sent, right?
[01:51:16.980 --> 01:51:28.980]  No, it was just an alderman asking for information and she dodged it and sent something else and she, but she did actually change the metadata on a photo.
[01:51:28.980 --> 01:51:42.980]  Actually she didn't, she didn't change it. She didn't know how to do that, but she, she omitted the timestamp on a photo and squeezed it in with three old, older photos to make it look like the signs that, you know, she was required to have up
[01:51:42.980 --> 01:51:45.980]  were always there and then she says, see, they were always been there, but I have, I have.
[01:51:45.980 --> 01:51:54.980]  Okay. Then you also have another one. You have tampering with evidence or falsification of evidence.
[01:51:54.980 --> 01:51:58.980]  That's an actual crime. Okay.
[01:51:58.980 --> 01:52:06.980]  It's not just a civil act. Now you may not have a civil claim for that. You'll have to look and see, but that's an actual crime.
[01:52:06.980 --> 01:52:15.980]  So tampering with evidence or falsification of evidence or fabrication of evidence, those are all criminal, that's criminal conduct.
[01:52:15.980 --> 01:52:28.980]  Okay. So who do I get now that I, that I've brought from Boston, my attention and so that's what's going on because I tried to do this with, with the Attorney General's office.
[01:52:28.980 --> 01:52:38.980]  I didn't do much. Take it to your local district or county attorney, whoever's the main prosecutor in your specific area or city, take it to them.
[01:52:38.980 --> 01:52:48.980]  And also here in Texas, we can take stuff like that directly to a grand jury, any grand jury in the state, in fact.
[01:52:48.980 --> 01:52:53.980]  So if you can deliver things to a grand jury there in Illinois, do that.
[01:52:53.980 --> 01:53:03.980]  I would like to. I would love to. Then make a sworn criminal statement making the allegation this woman and, or this company or all the above has committed these crimes.
[01:53:03.980 --> 01:53:08.980]  Because remember, they can only deal with the criminal stuff, not the civil stuff.
[01:53:08.980 --> 01:53:14.980]  Right. So if you want to get this woman indicted for these actual crimes, that's what you talk about.
[01:53:14.980 --> 01:53:27.980]  You can say the documents that you requested were for a civil proceeding, but in the process of providing those documents, she falsified and tampered with evidence that was provided, that was required to be provided for discovery.
[01:53:27.980 --> 01:53:31.980]  And does she commit an actual crime?
[01:53:31.980 --> 01:53:36.980]  Well, this was actually way before I filed the lawsuit. This was way back when this all started. This was.
[01:53:36.980 --> 01:53:44.980]  I'm sorry. Is there supposed to be a date in particular when falsifying evidence is not a crime?
[01:53:44.980 --> 01:53:46.980]  No, absolutely not.
[01:53:46.980 --> 01:53:48.980]  Okay. There you go.
[01:53:48.980 --> 01:53:50.980]  I'm just just making it within the context.
[01:53:50.980 --> 01:53:57.980]  You can do it however you want. I'm just saying that if that was the reason the records were requested when they were originally provided, you can say that.
[01:53:57.980 --> 01:54:02.980]  But the civil is not their issue. You can just say why the records are being requested in the first place.
[01:54:02.980 --> 01:54:08.980]  If that wasn't the case at the time, just say whatever it was. I was just giving you an example.
[01:54:08.980 --> 01:54:16.980]  Okay. Yeah, she wouldn't give it to me, obviously. I've been ignored, but when the alderman got involved, she got real scared and then she made up that story.
[01:54:16.980 --> 01:54:25.980]  So, well, that'd be cool. If I could get to the grand jury and drop a few criminal complaints, not only for her, but even for the police officers.
[01:54:25.980 --> 01:54:29.980]  Does she work in an official capacity or does she work for a private company?
[01:54:29.980 --> 01:54:31.980]  It's her own private company.
[01:54:31.980 --> 01:54:38.980]  Okay. Is it an incorporated company?
[01:54:38.980 --> 01:54:40.980]  I believe so, yeah.
[01:54:40.980 --> 01:54:50.980]  Then you can probably get her licensed to incorporate Revoked and probably get her business shut down if you can prove it.
[01:54:50.980 --> 01:54:55.980]  Yeah, well, that was a goal. It was a goal.
[01:54:55.980 --> 01:55:02.980]  If you work on the grand jury, I'll see how we get it. I've heard some stories of people sitting outside the hall waiting for them and then they just sneak in, you know?
[01:55:02.980 --> 01:55:12.980]  Yeah, well, you can do that, but you can also send a certified mail return receipt requested to the grand jury foreman and each of the other 11 grand jurors.
[01:55:12.980 --> 01:55:25.980]  You can say grand jury foreman, grand jury number one, grand jury number two, grand jury number three and send it addressed to each of those people individually on it.
[01:55:25.980 --> 01:55:34.980]  And if you do it certified mail return receipt requested, nobody else better open that thing, including the district or county attorney.
[01:55:34.980 --> 01:55:38.980]  Huh. Okay.
[01:55:38.980 --> 01:55:50.980]  Okay. And the way you verify about what they've seen is is you can, most states allow access to the grand jury minutes.
[01:55:50.980 --> 01:55:59.980]  So you will be able to go to the clerk of the court that convene the grand jury and check the minutes to see everything they've reviewed and talked about.
[01:55:59.980 --> 01:56:11.980]  You won't see anything they've deliberated on and whether or not they've handed down an indictment, but it should list everything they've discussed up to that point, except whether or not they actually took action.
[01:56:11.980 --> 01:56:13.980]  Okay.
[01:56:13.980 --> 01:56:22.980]  All right. And if after you send it in and you know they've gotten it, you don't see it pop up within a few days, send it again.
[01:56:22.980 --> 01:56:25.980]  Okay.
[01:56:25.980 --> 01:56:27.980]  Okay.
[01:56:27.980 --> 01:56:36.980]  All right. That may be a way to get past all the BS in the, in the city there. Nobody wants to be accountable or do anything.
[01:56:36.980 --> 01:56:38.980]  Very well may.
[01:56:38.980 --> 01:56:40.980]  Yeah.
[01:56:40.980 --> 01:56:49.980]  Now, another way you can do this is you can also send it up to the United States Attorney for Illinois.
[01:56:49.980 --> 01:56:58.980]  We say the locals here refuse to act on a corporation that is committing criminal offenses against members of the public and they won't do anything about it.
[01:56:58.980 --> 01:57:08.980]  So I guess I'm asking you what to do FBI, you know, what you just send it to him.
[01:57:08.980 --> 01:57:10.980]  Who's that one? Where is that one?
[01:57:10.980 --> 01:57:12.980]  Where's what one?
[01:57:12.980 --> 01:57:14.980]  United States Attorney, you said.
[01:57:14.980 --> 01:57:25.980]  Yeah, just look it up. Just whatever district you're in at the federal level, just find United States Attorney for Illinois or Chicago, Illinois, because you may have more than one.
[01:57:25.980 --> 01:57:27.980]  But that's not the Attorney General?
[01:57:27.980 --> 01:57:33.980]  No, the United States Attorney is a federal officer. He's not a state officer.
[01:57:33.980 --> 01:57:36.980]  Okay. Okay.
[01:57:36.980 --> 01:57:38.980]  I've never heard that one before. Okay, cool.
[01:57:38.980 --> 01:57:50.980]  The Attorney General is the legal counsel for the state. The United States Attorney is legal counsel for the federal government interacting with the state.
[01:57:50.980 --> 01:57:53.980]  Huh, interesting. Okay, I'll look it up.
[01:57:53.980 --> 01:57:55.980]  Okay.
[01:57:55.980 --> 01:57:57.980]  Awesome, man. Thank you.
[01:57:57.980 --> 01:57:59.980]  You're so welcome. Good luck.
[01:57:59.980 --> 01:58:01.980]  Okay. Appreciate it.
[01:58:01.980 --> 01:58:08.980]  All right, folks, that is the end of the show for tonight. I want to thank you all for listening and all for calling in.
[01:58:08.980 --> 01:58:20.980]  I hope everything goes great for everyone this week, especially those people that are going to be attending class and myself, that I keep things on the ball and rolling and everybody learns something useful.
[01:58:20.980 --> 01:58:31.980]  Again, if you want to enroll in the class, you can go to the LogosRadioNetwork.com or rule of law radio network.com and sign up there. Okay.
[01:58:31.980 --> 01:58:50.980]  All have a great week. Good night and God bless.
[01:59:01.980 --> 01:59:11.980]  Thank you.
[01:59:32.980 --> 01:59:40.980]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.980 --> 02:00:01.980]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.