ROL_2021-05-17_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:08.740]  Okay, not only are our speed limits not fixed, they are not applicable to all travelers upon
[00:08.740 --> 00:10.060]  the highways.
[00:10.060 --> 00:16.220]  In other words, there is no such offense in Texas as speeding in any code anywhere.
[00:16.220 --> 00:19.660]  It is a completely fabricated charge.
[00:19.660 --> 00:26.980]  All Texas speed signs posted on our roads and highways are subject to section 201.904
[00:26.980 --> 00:33.820]  transportation code, which reads section 201.904 speed signs.
[00:33.820 --> 00:36.980]  That's how it's titled, speed signs.
[00:36.980 --> 00:41.140]  The department shall erect and maintain on the highways and roads of this state appropriate
[00:41.140 --> 00:47.080]  signs that show the maximum lawful speed for commercial motor vehicles, truck tractors,
[00:47.080 --> 00:52.720]  truck trailers, truck semi-trailers, and motor vehicles engaged in the business of transporting
[00:52.720 --> 00:59.280]  passengers for compensation or hire, and in parentheses the word buses.
[00:59.280 --> 01:01.460]  Do you get that?
[01:01.460 --> 01:07.980]  Speed signs show the maximum lawful speed for, and then I enumerate each one of these individual
[01:07.980 --> 01:10.100]  things on a separate line.
[01:10.100 --> 01:17.260]  Commercial motor vehicles, truck tractors, truck trailers, truck semi-trailers, and motor
[01:17.260 --> 01:23.540]  vehicles engaged in the business of transporting passengers for compensation or hire.
[01:23.540 --> 01:28.540]  Nowhere does the code say that the numerical limit posted on a speed sign applies to any
[01:28.540 --> 01:31.660]  other conveyance and use upon the roadway.
[01:31.660 --> 01:33.160]  Nowhere.
[01:33.160 --> 01:41.660]  I can hear the naysayers now, but the existence of section 201.904 does not mean that anyone
[01:41.660 --> 01:48.860]  can simply go as fast as they want, anywhere they want, without any consequence whatsoever.
[01:48.860 --> 01:55.380]  This is where Texas Transportation Code section 545.351 comes into play.
[01:55.380 --> 02:01.660]  Under this statute, if your speed is a factor in a collision with another person or vehicle,
[02:01.660 --> 02:07.060]  and I got a brake coming up, I'll finish this on the other side when we get back in the
[02:07.060 --> 02:08.060]  meantime.
[02:08.060 --> 02:12.140]  If you want to be calling and getting in line, I will turn the call and board on.
[02:12.140 --> 02:19.260]  Call in number is 512-646-1984, if you want to call in and get in line.
[02:19.260 --> 02:27.460]  We'll be right back after the break, so y'all hang on.
[02:27.460 --> 02:37.060]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway, sponsored by Central Texas
[02:37.060 --> 02:38.060]  Gun Works.
[02:38.060 --> 02:41.660]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[02:41.660 --> 02:43.460]  Any amount is appreciated.
[02:43.460 --> 02:45.060]  Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[02:45.060 --> 02:51.700]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[02:51.700 --> 02:54.260]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[02:54.260 --> 02:57.460]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[02:57.460 --> 03:03.020]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Regal 101, you get four chances to win.
[03:03.020 --> 03:06.340]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get ten chances to win.
[03:06.340 --> 03:11.340]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can
[03:11.340 --> 03:15.700]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on TalkRadio today.
[03:15.700 --> 03:21.780]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and remember, every $25 donation is a chance
[03:21.780 --> 03:22.780]  to win.
[03:22.780 --> 03:27.780]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[03:27.780 --> 03:32.780]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[03:32.780 --> 03:36.540]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Muiris Proven Method.
[03:36.540 --> 03:40.900]  Michael Muiris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[03:40.900 --> 03:41.900]  can win, too.
[03:41.900 --> 03:46.700]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[03:46.700 --> 03:52.140]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[03:52.140 --> 03:56.460]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[03:56.460 --> 04:01.300]  how to turn the financial tables on them, and make them pay you to go away.
[04:01.300 --> 04:06.420]  The Michael Muiris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[04:06.420 --> 04:08.540]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[04:08.540 --> 04:14.180]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Muiris banner,
[04:14.180 --> 04:17.020]  or email Michael Muiris at yahoo.com.
[04:17.020 --> 04:26.660]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[04:26.660 --> 04:27.660]  next.
[04:27.660 --> 04:34.660]  If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, m-m-m-m-mogosradio-network.com, it's ready!
[05:27.660 --> 05:34.660]  Let's go, let's go, let's go!
[05:57.660 --> 06:22.620]  Alright folks, we are back, this is rule of law radio, again to call in number 512-646-1984.
[06:22.620 --> 06:32.980]  Now, I'm going to continue on here with this, under this statute, I'm sorry, this is where
[06:32.980 --> 06:38.140]  Texas Transportation Code section 545.351 comes into play.
[06:38.140 --> 06:42.900]  Under this statute, if your speed is a factor in a collision with another person or vehicle
[06:42.900 --> 06:48.340]  that is already lawfully upon or entering the highway, then your speed can be used to
[06:48.340 --> 06:55.620]  charge you with some other penal code crime if your actions cause or resulted in an injury
[06:55.620 --> 06:59.740]  or death or destroyed private property.
[06:59.740 --> 07:06.060]  Section 545.352 is the section responsible for setting the numerical limits posted on
[07:06.060 --> 07:11.420]  the speed signs, not for determining what would otherwise constitute an act of speeding
[07:11.420 --> 07:18.180]  as those elements are what is set forth in section 545.351.
[07:18.180 --> 07:23.260]  On these grounds alone, the officer's traffic stop for speeding or registration, had he
[07:23.260 --> 07:29.540]  stopped him for that, was 100% illegal under the law as it is written.
[07:29.540 --> 07:35.380]  As there was no probable cause to believe that the vehicle itself was subject to the
[07:35.380 --> 07:45.340]  requirements of either sections 201.904, 545.351 or 545.352.
[07:45.340 --> 07:50.940]  If the down defense attorneys, people higher for these cases would actually read and understand
[07:50.940 --> 07:58.860]  the whole of the law as it is written in the damn statutes, they might actually understand
[07:58.860 --> 08:05.300]  this and be of some help to those who are paying them to defend them.
[08:05.300 --> 08:10.820]  So not only was this officer completely wrong about the registration sticker being an arrestable
[08:10.820 --> 08:17.020]  offense, he is equally wrong about the reading of Texas Penal Code section 3802, Failure
[08:17.020 --> 08:18.740]  to ID.
[08:18.740 --> 08:24.580]  Now this whole video came about because he is insisting that he can ID the guy's son
[08:24.580 --> 08:27.820]  that's sitting on the other side as a passenger.
[08:27.820 --> 08:31.820]  The cop is intentionally misrepresenting the law.
[08:31.820 --> 08:36.180]  Anybody in a car that I stopped for an offense is guilty of that offense and I can ID everybody
[08:36.180 --> 08:37.180]  in it.
[08:37.180 --> 08:40.180]  No, you can't, not under Texas law.
[08:40.180 --> 08:46.740]  I don't care what the Supreme Court ruled, state law supersedes that ruling.
[08:46.740 --> 08:47.740]  Why?
[08:47.740 --> 08:52.580]  Because the Supreme Court didn't invalidate the Texas law and they can't.
[08:52.580 --> 08:59.380]  It's not unconstitutional, it's exactly the opposite.
[08:59.380 --> 09:06.500]  Texas law is what matters here, not what the Supreme Court ruled on general principle governing
[09:06.500 --> 09:11.700]  many states that don't have the law, we have.
[09:11.700 --> 09:19.500]  So the cop is an idiot, okay, completely and what's even worse is I have yet to figure
[09:19.500 --> 09:25.700]  out from this, because I haven't watched the whole video from getting in, it just infuriated
[09:25.700 --> 09:30.380]  me so much in the first few minutes just by listening to this idiotic cop, I don't even
[09:30.380 --> 09:32.140]  know what agency he's with.
[09:32.140 --> 09:36.420]  I don't know if he's sheriff, I don't know if he's local PD, I don't know if he's state
[09:36.420 --> 09:47.860]  trooper, but if he is a state trooper, this guy should not have a job at all.
[09:47.860 --> 09:54.540]  Because when he does get on the radio with his supervisor trying to find some reason
[09:54.540 --> 10:01.700]  to arrest these two guys, because there is not one and he damn well knows it, right then
[10:01.700 --> 10:07.100]  and there should have been the end of his ability to serve as a law enforcement officer.
[10:07.100 --> 10:13.020]  Any supervising officer or chief of his agency that sees this video should have had this
[10:13.020 --> 10:18.500]  guy on the mat and taken away every power he ever believed he had and making sure he
[10:18.500 --> 10:22.100]  could never go somewhere else.
[10:22.100 --> 10:30.500]  He is that incompetent, he is that ignorant, or is he something else, which is what I'll
[10:30.500 --> 10:33.700]  be getting to next.
[10:33.700 --> 10:43.740]  Now the passenger is not required to provide any kind of ID whatsoever, either physically
[10:43.740 --> 10:47.980]  or verbally, in response to the officer's demands.
[10:47.980 --> 10:52.500]  So if this were me, I'd say kick, rock, say, hold and take your badge and costume with
[10:52.500 --> 11:01.020]  you, and I'd be exactly justified in doing so, because he has absolutely no authority
[11:01.020 --> 11:05.260]  to do what he did or tried to do, none.
[11:05.260 --> 11:09.620]  The law doesn't support it, but you can't tell that to these idiots because none of
[11:09.620 --> 11:11.180]  them read it.
[11:11.180 --> 11:17.100]  Not the cops, not the judges, not the prosecutors, not the defense attorneys, they don't freaking
[11:17.100 --> 11:18.100]  read it.
[11:18.100 --> 11:20.580]  How many times do I explain that on this show?
[11:20.580 --> 11:26.100]  How many times have you people out there listening been hauled into court and watched
[11:26.100 --> 11:28.100]  it?
[11:28.100 --> 11:32.540]  You know full well by listening to this show what the law says and requires, and these
[11:32.540 --> 11:38.860]  people are ignoring it, and you're the one that's paying the price for their ignorance.
[11:38.860 --> 11:45.460]  But that brings us to the other article that I've been working on for the last couple
[11:45.460 --> 11:50.580]  days, trying to get the language corrected and just right and so on and so forth, so
[11:50.580 --> 11:55.100]  that it's not repetitive and it doesn't draw out the discussion anymore than it has to
[11:55.100 --> 11:59.500]  to follow the logical steps and points to make the conclusions I make.
[11:59.500 --> 12:04.420]  So before I even get it posted on the legal blog, I'm going to let the listeners hear
[12:04.420 --> 12:09.820]  it, and then it will get posted to the legal blog after I find somebody to actually do
[12:09.820 --> 12:11.500]  a proof reading of this.
[12:11.500 --> 12:15.660]  And folks, let me interject something here real quick before I start reading this and
[12:15.660 --> 12:19.180]  get off into it.
[12:19.180 --> 12:24.940]  I have taken so long to get the new seminar material out because I have to feel every
[12:24.940 --> 12:31.980]  single role that normally goes to a multitude of different people to get something published.
[12:31.980 --> 12:35.740]  Not only do I have to write it, I have to research it.
[12:35.740 --> 12:40.940]  If it requires pictures, I have to illustrate it, which means I'm also the artist, then
[12:40.940 --> 12:44.740]  I'm the designer of how this has all got to be laid out and put together.
[12:44.740 --> 12:48.740]  If I'm self-publishing, I've got to put it in the format and whatever it's going to
[12:48.740 --> 12:51.940]  be in on a permanent basis when it's done.
[12:51.940 --> 12:53.380]  I've got to proofread it.
[12:53.380 --> 12:54.580]  I've got to edit it.
[12:54.580 --> 12:58.860]  And let me tell you, when you start dealing with law and extensive discussion over a
[12:58.860 --> 13:04.580]  subject, it does not behoove you to be your own proofreader.
[13:04.580 --> 13:07.580]  It does not behoove you to be your own editor.
[13:07.580 --> 13:13.060]  The problem, though, is that you need to have someone with almost the same level of knowledge
[13:13.060 --> 13:18.020]  and understanding that you have to do those jobs so that they can really understand what
[13:18.020 --> 13:22.340]  you're trying to say and, thus, when they edit, they understand whether or not the edit
[13:22.340 --> 13:27.900]  is one of grammar or it's one of law.
[13:27.900 --> 13:31.660]  And then, of course, same thing goes to the publishing and all this other kind of stuff
[13:31.660 --> 13:32.660]  that goes with it.
[13:32.660 --> 13:40.740]  It is very, very, very time-consuming to fill all of those roles by yourself.
[13:40.740 --> 13:46.180]  So please don't let the timeframe of the seminar material concern you.
[13:46.180 --> 13:51.980]  It just simply takes time that one guy has to devote to it to get it done.
[13:51.980 --> 13:56.700]  And it's not like the law itself changes to any huge degree every couple of years.
[13:56.700 --> 13:58.260]  That's not true.
[13:58.260 --> 14:03.660]  The seminar material, in general, is just as sound today as it was 12 years ago when
[14:03.660 --> 14:05.220]  I wrote it.
[14:05.220 --> 14:10.140]  The only thing that's changed is some of the rules of procedure made some of the paperwork
[14:10.140 --> 14:16.340]  irrelevant because they fixed the code so they couldn't do it that way anymore.
[14:16.340 --> 14:17.540]  Okay?
[14:17.540 --> 14:21.740]  And believe it or not, people, that's one of the other things I have to do is I have
[14:21.740 --> 14:28.240]  to go down to the Capitol myself and lobby these people to change this crap because nobody
[14:28.240 --> 14:33.580]  else knows and understands it or cares, apparently.
[14:33.580 --> 14:38.140]  So not only am I doing all this stuff on my own, I'm going down here to the legislator's
[14:38.140 --> 14:39.140]  offices.
[14:39.140 --> 14:41.260]  I'm holding personal meetings with these people.
[14:41.260 --> 14:46.060]  I'm showing them what the law says, when I can wake them up long enough to pay attention
[14:46.060 --> 14:50.780]  or threaten them well enough with not getting reelected by exposing them to the public,
[14:50.780 --> 14:56.260]  for not giving a crap about who's getting screwed by the job they're doing or not doing
[14:56.260 --> 15:04.260]  in this case, it's a time-consuming task, believe me, okay?
[15:04.260 --> 15:11.900]  People just don't care enough to get off their butts and do this, so here I am stuck
[15:11.900 --> 15:12.900]  doing it.
[15:12.900 --> 15:17.540]  All right, we got a break and when we get back, I will start in on the other article
[15:17.540 --> 15:22.020]  that will be published on the blog sometime this week and we will go from there.
[15:22.020 --> 15:27.020]  So y'all hang on and we will be right back, 512-646-1984.
[15:27.020 --> 15:34.140]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under
[15:34.140 --> 15:35.620]  the blood alcohol limit.
[15:35.620 --> 15:40.540]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers and a government
[15:40.540 --> 15:43.060]  cover-up in a moment.
[15:43.060 --> 15:44.660]  Privacy is under attack.
[15:44.660 --> 15:48.260]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[15:48.260 --> 15:53.020]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[15:53.020 --> 15:57.980]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[15:57.980 --> 16:00.780]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[16:00.780 --> 16:05.100]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[16:05.100 --> 16:08.620]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[16:08.620 --> 16:10.820]  Start over with StartPage.
[16:10.820 --> 16:14.180]  Ever hear the term fine farming?
[16:14.180 --> 16:18.700]  It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and it's apparently big business
[16:18.700 --> 16:20.700]  in the Sunshine State of Florida.
[16:20.700 --> 16:26.860]  This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[16:26.860 --> 16:31.580]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated.
[16:31.580 --> 16:35.220]  State officials knew about it for two and a half years but did nothing.
[16:35.220 --> 16:40.220]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document
[16:40.220 --> 16:41.220]  the problem.
[16:41.220 --> 16:46.100]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life but now that the cover-up has been exposed,
[16:46.100 --> 16:48.940]  perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[16:48.940 --> 16:57.940]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[16:57.940 --> 17:03.300]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[17:03.300 --> 17:05.540]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[17:05.540 --> 17:10.340]  However, 1500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[17:10.340 --> 17:14.340]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow
[17:14.340 --> 17:15.780]  force responders have died.
[17:15.780 --> 17:17.260]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[17:17.260 --> 17:18.260]  I'm a structural engineer.
[17:18.260 --> 17:19.620]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[17:19.620 --> 17:20.620]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[17:20.620 --> 17:22.260]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[17:22.260 --> 17:24.900]  We are Americans and we deserve the truth.
[17:24.900 --> 17:27.900]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[17:27.900 --> 17:32.380]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[17:32.380 --> 17:35.860]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we, the people, are ever
[17:35.860 --> 17:39.820]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[17:39.820 --> 17:43.260]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[17:43.260 --> 17:47.260]  in our own private capacity and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[17:47.260 --> 17:51.140]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[17:51.140 --> 17:52.620]  our rights through due process.
[17:52.620 --> 17:56.500]  For Sheriff's Deputy Kay Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[17:56.500 --> 18:00.260]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:00.260 --> 18:02.340]  is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[18:02.340 --> 18:06.660]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and
[18:06.660 --> 18:10.340]  ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[18:10.340 --> 18:15.020]  Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[18:15.020 --> 18:18.020]  Hundreds of research documents and further useful resource material.
[18:18.020 --> 18:21.820]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[18:21.820 --> 18:39.260]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[18:39.260 --> 19:02.620]  All right, folks, we are back now.
[19:02.620 --> 19:16.140]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show, it is May 17, 2021.
[19:16.140 --> 19:19.140]  We are live tonight.
[19:19.140 --> 19:23.220]  Now I want to get into an article that's going to get posted up on the legal blog this week.
[19:23.220 --> 19:27.140]  As soon as I'm sure it's been proof read and I've got everything the way I want it, but
[19:27.140 --> 19:29.020]  I want to read it to you as it currently exists.
[19:29.020 --> 19:35.860]  The title of this article is, A Theory on the Causation of Bad Law Enforcement and Court
[19:35.860 --> 19:36.860]  Decisions.
[19:36.860 --> 19:39.660]  That's the title.
[19:39.660 --> 19:44.600]  If you think about it logically, many reasonable and critical thinking individuals would probably
[19:44.600 --> 19:49.780]  say that we can boil everything down to only three general causes for why an executive
[19:49.780 --> 19:56.400]  official or a judicial court would make an incorrect interpretation or ruling in a case
[19:56.400 --> 20:01.500]  regarding the correct interpretation and application of actual written law.
[20:01.500 --> 20:06.260]  Those three being ignorance, incompetence, or corruption.
[20:06.260 --> 20:13.940]  However, I believe that the facts can be further boiled down to the point where only one of
[20:13.940 --> 20:17.100]  these is actually correct.
[20:17.100 --> 20:22.460]  Let me try to explain logically why I believe that is.
[20:22.460 --> 20:28.420]  We can presume as fact that no politically savvy executive official or judicial officer
[20:28.420 --> 20:35.140]  in general is ever going to admit to being ignorant or incompetent of the written law
[20:35.140 --> 20:41.940]  or of any controlling court opinions relative to the interpretation of that law.
[20:41.940 --> 20:47.780]  Because this is the presumed norm, the various bar associations would have us all believe
[20:47.780 --> 20:52.860]  that our judicial functionaries, the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and corporate
[20:52.860 --> 20:59.940]  legal counsels, have a professional, ethical, and moral duty and obligation to know in quotes
[20:59.940 --> 21:06.180]  the law and to know it substantially better than any executive functionary or layman.
[21:06.180 --> 21:10.380]  In parentheses, yeah, they call us the layman.
[21:10.380 --> 21:16.180]  This presumption alone is reason enough to put forth the argument that no judicial officer
[21:16.180 --> 21:21.700]  can be reasonably presumed to be ignorant of what any part of the law actually says or
[21:21.700 --> 21:29.100]  means, especially when that particular area of law is their publicly proclaimed and advertised
[21:29.100 --> 21:37.340]  specialty, such as criminal defense, corporate law, family law, et cetera, et cetera.
[21:37.340 --> 21:42.580]  But then again, what can you logically expect from a group of individuals who serve their
[21:42.580 --> 21:49.140]  own private interests while literally having official and functional control over every
[21:49.140 --> 21:54.860]  high office in every department and agency within every single level of our government
[21:54.860 --> 21:56.420]  and attorneys do?
[21:56.420 --> 22:02.940]  Attorneys occupy every major office in every branch, department, and level of government.
[22:02.940 --> 22:03.940]  Attorneys do.
[22:03.940 --> 22:06.620]  You get that, right?
[22:06.620 --> 22:13.620]  Now, my personal interpretation of knowing is something as important as the law and how
[22:13.620 --> 22:20.820]  it is supposed to function is that one actually spends countless hours expanding and expanding
[22:20.820 --> 22:28.700]  brain cells over many long hours, days, months, or years in research and study of the law itself
[22:28.700 --> 22:33.940]  and its legislative and interpretive history, so as to truly have a deeper knowledge and
[22:33.940 --> 22:40.180]  understanding of what it actually says and means according to the combined whole of all
[22:40.180 --> 22:47.340]  relevant statutes applicable to that particular object or subject matter area relative to
[22:47.340 --> 22:51.220]  any individual provision, okay?
[22:51.220 --> 22:55.100]  The deeper meaning of my interpretation and understanding will be made clear when you
[22:55.100 --> 23:00.380]  read the literal meaning of the phrase, the whole of the law, a little further on.
[23:00.380 --> 23:05.500]  What is important right now is understanding that the highly presumptive and false belief
[23:05.500 --> 23:11.060]  that there really is a deeper knowing and understanding of the law by those serving
[23:11.060 --> 23:18.100]  as judges and attorneys is being marketed to the masses as a sound and logical reason
[23:18.100 --> 23:23.780]  to entrust our very lives and property to these individuals, and again in parentheses,
[23:23.780 --> 23:29.180]  which is an egregious mistake, rather than trying to handle things for ourselves when
[23:29.180 --> 23:34.340]  it comes to our personal and business affairs or actions within the courts.
[23:34.340 --> 23:40.380]  There is an ancient maximum law that states, ignorantia jurist non-excuse it, or ignorance
[23:40.380 --> 23:42.860]  of the law does not excuse.
[23:42.860 --> 23:48.260]  Put another way, it is presumed that the public knows the laws and a defense of ignorance
[23:48.260 --> 23:54.380]  is typically not allowed, unless you're a cop, right, or a judge, or a prosecutor, or
[23:54.380 --> 23:56.380]  a defense attorney, right?
[23:56.380 --> 23:58.580]  Yeah, that's the way it goes.
[23:58.580 --> 24:04.740]  So if the public, in general, is presumed to know the law, even if they have never
[24:04.740 --> 24:10.620]  even actually cede and read it, then how is it possible for those empowered by we the
[24:10.620 --> 24:17.020]  people to serve within the executive and judicial departments of government to apply and enforce
[24:17.020 --> 24:24.660]  the laws to ever claim ignorance as the basis for their getting an interpretation, application,
[24:24.660 --> 24:31.740]  or ruling on any given law completely wrong in any or every possible way or just in spite
[24:31.740 --> 24:33.980]  of it?
[24:33.980 --> 24:39.420]  Using this logic combined with the aforementioned legal maximum, I assert that as the public
[24:39.420 --> 24:44.820]  at large cannot be presumed to be ignorant of the law, then by no means can any possible
[24:44.820 --> 24:50.540]  level of ignorance be presumed or allowed to exist for those in any department of government,
[24:50.540 --> 24:55.500]  especially within the judiciary, for whom extensively learning and understanding the
[24:55.500 --> 25:01.460]  whole of the laws is their primary function and reason for existence.
[25:01.460 --> 25:05.980]  And then in bold letters, I've got the following paragraph.
[25:05.980 --> 25:11.020]  This does not simply mean the learning and understanding of the individual statutes, but
[25:11.020 --> 25:18.740]  also how those statutes overlap and are intertwined by any object or subject matter relationships
[25:18.740 --> 25:25.660]  with any others, even those of other statutory schemes that may exist within and across multiple
[25:25.660 --> 25:30.820]  sections of the same or other statutory codes.
[25:30.820 --> 25:36.380]  This level of knowledge and understanding about all of these various statutory interactions
[25:36.380 --> 25:42.860]  and relational dependencies is what is meant by the judicially coined phrase, the whole
[25:42.860 --> 25:46.740]  of the law, okay?
[25:46.740 --> 25:51.820]  So what I said before about expanding and expanding brain cells and long hours of study
[25:51.820 --> 25:58.460]  is so that you can get this level of understanding of how all of the statutes interact so as
[25:58.460 --> 26:03.420]  to understand the whole of the law, okay?
[26:03.420 --> 26:10.220]  Thus, if a government actor cannot be reasonably presumed to be ignorant about something that
[26:10.220 --> 26:16.980]  it is their primary duty to fully learn and understand, and yet that government actor
[26:16.980 --> 26:25.020]  is still allowed to continuously misunderstand, misapply, and misuse virtually everything
[26:25.020 --> 26:30.340]  related there too, then the correct presumption of the cause cannot be that the government
[26:30.340 --> 26:35.540]  actor is simply acting out of ignorance of such things.
[26:35.540 --> 26:37.660]  Consider this.
[26:37.660 --> 26:43.220]  If those in charge over an individual governmental actor ever repeatedly tried to correct the
[26:43.220 --> 26:49.220]  actor's improper understanding and application of a particular law or a duty imposed by
[26:49.220 --> 26:57.380]  a law and the actor still continues to do everything or any part thereof incorrectly,
[26:57.380 --> 27:04.340]  then they are de facto incompetent because they are demonstrably untrainable, as shown
[27:04.340 --> 27:09.780]  by the fact that all attempts to properly train and correct their flawed understanding
[27:09.780 --> 27:13.660]  and actions have failed.
[27:13.660 --> 27:20.260]  By that same reasoning, if the incompetent individual's supervisor or supervisors never
[27:20.260 --> 27:25.260]  recognized and made the effort to correct the underling's improper understanding and
[27:25.260 --> 27:31.780]  behavior, then they too are demonstrably incompetent for exactly the same reasons.
[27:31.780 --> 27:38.460]  Thus, if the individual actors at either level are determined to be wholly incompetent in
[27:38.460 --> 27:44.300]  this matter, then they cannot be classified as simply ignorant, nor rely upon its assertion
[27:44.300 --> 27:46.340]  as a viable excuse.
[27:46.340 --> 27:52.780]  Thus, logically, ignorance can no longer be considered as one of the three possible causes
[27:52.780 --> 27:59.100]  for why so many of those within the executive department keep misapplying and misusing the
[27:59.100 --> 28:05.500]  laws or why those in the judiciary keep creating precedent-setting opinions about the constitutions
[28:05.500 --> 28:11.580]  or the laws that are demonstrably incorrect and illogical, either in whole or in part,
[28:11.580 --> 28:15.940]  time and time again.
[28:15.940 --> 28:21.260]  Having now logically eliminated the possibility of ignorance being a contributing cause for
[28:21.260 --> 28:27.460]  any executive or judicial functionaries' failure to properly interpret and apply the
[28:27.460 --> 28:32.940]  law, we are left with two remaining choices, incompetence or corruption.
[28:32.940 --> 28:40.460]  However, just as before, I assert that incompetence in and of itself is also a logical impossibility
[28:40.460 --> 28:43.540]  as the cause for such failures.
[28:43.540 --> 28:50.220]  For instance, if an executive functionary or a judge is offered a demonstrably true
[28:50.220 --> 28:58.500]  and wholly viable and verifiable alternative interpretation of the law that fully meshes
[28:58.500 --> 29:04.820]  with the whole of the law as previously described, and all right, I guess I've got to stop there
[29:04.820 --> 29:05.820]  for the break.
[29:05.820 --> 29:09.460]  All right, I'll finish up this on the other side, hopefully I'll get that far.
[29:09.460 --> 29:13.020]  I may be more than half a document on that segment, so I should be able to finish it by
[29:13.020 --> 29:14.020]  the end.
[29:14.020 --> 29:15.500]  After that point, we'll start taking calls.
[29:15.500 --> 29:20.580]  But in the meantime, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[29:20.580 --> 29:24.740]  If you want to call and get in the queue and be ready to ask questions or make comments,
[29:24.740 --> 29:28.020]  we will be right back after the break.
[29:28.020 --> 29:31.220]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[29:31.220 --> 29:37.980]  When your case without attorney with jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[29:37.980 --> 29:41.980]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[29:41.980 --> 29:45.700]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[29:45.700 --> 29:49.620]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[29:49.620 --> 29:55.700]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[29:55.700 --> 30:01.620]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[30:01.620 --> 30:06.060]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[30:06.060 --> 30:10.420]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[30:10.420 --> 30:16.540]  You will receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[30:16.540 --> 30:19.100]  prosa tactics, and much more.
[30:19.100 --> 30:23.300]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[30:23.300 --> 30:28.500]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[30:28.500 --> 30:29.500]  I love logos.
[30:29.500 --> 30:33.020]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[30:33.020 --> 30:35.660]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[30:35.660 --> 30:36.860]  I need my truth pick.
[30:36.860 --> 30:41.540]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[30:41.540 --> 30:45.300]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't
[30:45.300 --> 30:48.660]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[30:48.660 --> 30:50.140]  How can I help logos?
[30:50.140 --> 30:52.020]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[30:52.020 --> 30:55.180]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[30:55.180 --> 30:57.700]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts.
[30:57.700 --> 30:59.860]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[30:59.860 --> 31:05.860]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo, and bookmark it.
[31:05.860 --> 31:11.740]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[31:11.740 --> 31:12.740]  Do I pay extra?
[31:12.740 --> 31:13.740]  No.
[31:13.740 --> 31:15.740]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[31:15.740 --> 31:16.740]  No.
[31:16.740 --> 31:17.740]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[31:17.740 --> 31:18.740]  No.
[31:18.740 --> 31:19.740]  I mean, yes.
[31:19.740 --> 31:24.220]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[31:24.220 --> 31:25.220]  Thank you so much.
[31:25.220 --> 31:26.220]  We are welcome.
[31:26.220 --> 31:27.220]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[31:27.220 --> 31:37.220]  I'm searching a thousand dreams, they're haunted by a million screams, where I can hear the
[31:37.220 --> 31:49.220]  marching beats, they're moving into the streets, and if you read the news today, they say the
[31:49.220 --> 31:59.220]  danger is down our way, but I can see the fires in the light, burning into the night.
[31:59.220 --> 32:11.220]  There's too many men, too many people speaking too many problems, and I'm hard to love you
[32:11.220 --> 32:12.220]  around.
[32:12.220 --> 32:21.220]  All right, folks, we are back, this is a Monday Night Rural Law Radio Show with your host,
[32:21.220 --> 32:22.220]  Eddie Craig.
[32:22.220 --> 32:25.660]  It is May 17, 2021.
[32:25.660 --> 32:30.100]  We are live tonight, and I am reading an article that we posted up on the legal blog at some
[32:30.100 --> 32:31.260]  point this week.
[32:31.260 --> 32:37.060]  Now, I'm about to read you a continuing portion of the article that's going to be posted dealing
[32:37.060 --> 32:42.060]  with why incompetence is a logical impossibility for these people on the subject we're talking
[32:42.060 --> 32:43.060]  about.
[32:43.060 --> 32:45.380]  So, I'm going to start that paragraph over.
[32:45.380 --> 32:50.700]  For instance, if an executive functionary or a judge is offered a demonstrably true
[32:50.700 --> 32:56.620]  and wholly viable and verifiable alternative interpretation of the law that fully meshes
[32:56.620 --> 33:02.780]  with the whole of the law as previously described, and that the existing executive interpretation
[33:02.780 --> 33:09.500]  or judicial precedent can be reasonably shown to not be true precisely because it does not
[33:09.500 --> 33:15.660]  fully mesh with the whole of the law, but the executive functionary or judge refuses to
[33:15.660 --> 33:22.300]  acknowledge, accept, or even investigate and research the legal basis supporting the factual
[33:22.300 --> 33:29.220]  challenge to the existing and legally incorrect, and in parentheses, shorting it to bad, interpretation
[33:29.220 --> 33:35.500]  or precedent in order to continue applying the bad interpretation or precedent despite
[33:35.500 --> 33:41.020]  the facts and evidence, then neither the executive functionary nor the judge is applying the
[33:41.020 --> 33:45.780]  actual law to the facts or the facts to the actual law.
[33:45.780 --> 33:51.460]  What either government actor is really doing in this scenario is ignoring and avoiding
[33:51.460 --> 34:00.380]  his or her duty to know, understand, and apply the law as a whole, and by doing so is applying
[34:00.380 --> 34:07.540]  only that which she or he has already been shown to be a completely incorrect interpretation
[34:07.540 --> 34:09.180]  of the law.
[34:09.180 --> 34:16.140]  Thus, these governmental actors have decided to treat the bad interpretation or precedent
[34:16.140 --> 34:22.140]  as being the only thing that is legally relevant and necessary for consideration in order to
[34:22.140 --> 34:24.580]  render their decision.
[34:24.580 --> 34:29.300]  In other words, the government actor has just declared that the law as it was written and
[34:29.300 --> 34:34.020]  intended to be interpreted and applied by the legislature be damned, regardless of the
[34:34.020 --> 34:39.740]  facts and evidence to the contrary, as she or he is going to follow the prior interpretation
[34:39.740 --> 34:45.580]  or precedent of another government official or court that also completely ignored the
[34:45.580 --> 34:51.620]  requirement to understand and apply the whole of the law that resulted in the incorrect
[34:51.620 --> 34:57.180]  understanding and interpretation of the legislature's original purpose and intent for the law
[34:57.180 --> 34:59.540]  in the first place.
[34:59.540 --> 35:05.300]  Now, anyone in the legal field with a working brain will tell you that knowingly acting
[35:05.300 --> 35:11.300]  in bad faith under any legitimate set of circumstances is an act of willful intent.
[35:11.300 --> 35:18.220]  Thus, by willfully choosing to ignore the newly presented facts and evidence refuting the
[35:18.220 --> 35:25.300]  legal foundation of any prior executive interpretation or judicial precedent, the executive functionary
[35:25.300 --> 35:32.460]  or judicial officer is acting with knowing and willful intent, not ignorance or incompetence.
[35:32.460 --> 35:39.340]  For the express purpose of ignoring the existing relevant law in order to reach a conclusion,
[35:39.340 --> 35:46.020]  she or he now knows to be completely incongruous with the law itself.
[35:46.020 --> 35:51.620]  Thus, if these governmental actors cannot be presumed to be acting out of ignorance
[35:51.620 --> 35:57.740]  or incompetence to make such an unlawful determination or ruling in the face of countermanding facts
[35:57.740 --> 36:04.700]  and evidence, then the only cause remaining as motivation for the act is corruption.
[36:04.700 --> 36:07.340]  The facts are irrefutable.
[36:07.340 --> 36:12.220]  The executive functionary or the judge of the court is knowingly and willfully ignoring
[36:12.220 --> 36:18.060]  the proper legislative intent, purpose and interpretation of the law for one that she
[36:18.060 --> 36:24.940]  or he now knows to be legally incorrect in order to achieve an outcome favorable to the
[36:24.940 --> 36:32.780]  functionaries or judges on ego, reputation and career interests and not to the rightful
[36:32.780 --> 36:38.860]  party who should be prevailing on the merits according to the law.
[36:38.860 --> 36:44.220]  This can only mean that these governmental actors have acted in favor of their own personal
[36:44.220 --> 36:50.300]  and political self-interest while knowingly and willfully depriving that same rightful
[36:50.300 --> 36:57.100]  party of their full and proper right to due process and remedy under the law.
[36:57.100 --> 37:00.700]  This is a criminal act if ever there was one.
[37:00.700 --> 37:06.780]  Lest you forget, abusing the power of one's official office for personal gain or to harm
[37:06.780 --> 37:12.300]  the rights of the people you sought to protect is outright corruption on its face.
[37:12.300 --> 37:20.020]  See, I told you that there was really only one logical cause for our executive and judicial
[37:20.020 --> 37:26.940]  officers to be making so many fundamentally bad interpretation and precedent setting
[37:26.940 --> 37:29.940]  decisions.
[37:29.940 --> 37:32.540]  That ladies and gentlemen is the article that's going to go up.
[37:32.540 --> 37:36.860]  Now, if you have issue with anything I wrote in that, you'll be free to comment on it and
[37:36.860 --> 37:40.580]  let me know where I'm wrong or why you think I did it incorrectly.
[37:40.580 --> 37:46.020]  I tried to go through this as logically as possible to show we don't have a claim of
[37:46.020 --> 37:48.340]  ignorance, they can't have a claim of ignorance.
[37:48.340 --> 37:51.820]  That throws ignorance right out the window.
[37:51.820 --> 37:57.580]  And if they turn around and still can't do their job properly after being trained, retrained,
[37:57.580 --> 38:01.980]  punished for it and trained again, then they're not acting out of ignorance, they're acting
[38:01.980 --> 38:03.580]  out of incompetence.
[38:03.580 --> 38:09.380]  If they're acting out of incompetence, they shouldn't be in this damn job to begin with.
[38:09.380 --> 38:13.820]  Even if the supervisor isn't catching the fact that they're acting out of incompetence,
[38:13.820 --> 38:18.220]  the supervisor is equally incompetent.
[38:18.220 --> 38:23.380]  And if they choose to overlook the incompetence to the degree that someone is being harmed
[38:23.380 --> 38:30.300]  by either of their actions or failure to act, then that's corruption.
[38:30.300 --> 38:32.820]  That is criminal.
[38:32.820 --> 38:38.420]  So it really only boils down to one thing and one thing only.
[38:38.420 --> 38:44.700]  Not a single public official that does something wrong can ever point the finger at anything
[38:44.700 --> 38:49.820]  as a cause other than corruption.
[38:49.820 --> 38:53.780]  It's not a mistake made out of ignorance, it's not a mistake made out of incompetence.
[38:53.780 --> 38:56.220]  It's flat out fricking corruption.
[38:56.220 --> 39:03.940]  If they have done this before and are doing it again, there is no doubt it is corruption.
[39:03.940 --> 39:06.340]  Okay.
[39:06.340 --> 39:13.620]  Now that said, calling number 512-646-1984, I've got one caller up on the board, I need
[39:13.620 --> 39:14.620]  some more.
[39:14.620 --> 39:19.180]  So everybody start calling and let's start talking because I've got an hour left in
[39:19.180 --> 39:20.180]  this show.
[39:20.180 --> 39:24.100]  All right, that said, let's get Bob in California up on the line.
[39:24.100 --> 39:26.100]  Bob, what do you got?
[39:26.100 --> 39:36.180]  Eddie, what I'd like to find out from you, it's a little post of office.
[39:36.180 --> 39:49.580]  I'm looking at some post of office and nobody administered them, or whoever administered
[39:49.580 --> 39:52.220]  them didn't seem to want to sign the oath.
[39:52.220 --> 39:53.220]  Okay.
[39:53.220 --> 39:55.340]  What do you think of that?
[39:55.340 --> 39:56.340]  I don't know.
[39:56.340 --> 39:59.940]  What does the California Constitution and the laws of California say is required when
[39:59.940 --> 40:01.900]  it comes to such an oath?
[40:01.900 --> 40:03.980]  Well, I haven't read that.
[40:03.980 --> 40:05.780]  I know what it says in Texas.
[40:05.780 --> 40:09.700]  In Texas, that's a completely invalid oath under our Constitution.
[40:09.700 --> 40:10.700]  Okay.
[40:10.700 --> 40:17.060]  Now, another thing I want to go talk to you about is the oath itself.
[40:17.060 --> 40:23.500]  It is only half of the oath that the Constitution says they're supposed to take.
[40:23.500 --> 40:24.500]  Okay.
[40:24.500 --> 40:28.580]  Which Constitution says they're supposed to take?
[40:28.580 --> 40:30.460]  The California Constitution.
[40:30.460 --> 40:31.460]  Okay.
[40:31.460 --> 40:36.860]  So, the oath that they're being given is not even close to being verbatim the one that's
[40:36.860 --> 40:41.460]  in the California Constitution.
[40:41.460 --> 40:46.860]  The first paragraph is exactly the same as what's in the Constitution, but the one in
[40:46.860 --> 40:50.100]  the Constitution is two paragraphs long.
[40:50.100 --> 40:57.940]  Yeah, but do they apply to the different entities or agencies or areas of government?
[40:57.940 --> 41:01.700]  No, it says every employee.
[41:01.700 --> 41:02.700]  Okay.
[41:02.700 --> 41:07.820]  Every employee has to take the following oath.
[41:07.820 --> 41:13.500]  And you're sure that there are two clauses, two sections of that oath in the California
[41:13.500 --> 41:14.500]  Constitution?
[41:14.500 --> 41:15.500]  Yes, sir.
[41:15.500 --> 41:16.500]  I saw it.
[41:16.500 --> 41:17.500]  It's in there.
[41:17.500 --> 41:22.940]  And after they show what the oath is, it says, and no other.
[41:22.940 --> 41:23.940]  Okay.
[41:23.940 --> 41:24.940]  Hang on.
[41:24.940 --> 41:30.660]  Let me see if I can pull up the California oath of office.
[41:30.660 --> 41:38.300]  Article one section, no, wait a minute, yeah, article one section three, I think it is.
[41:38.300 --> 41:39.300]  Okay.
[41:39.300 --> 41:44.740]  And you see it's boxed in there?
[41:44.740 --> 41:45.740]  Okay.
[41:45.740 --> 41:46.740]  Yeah.
[41:46.740 --> 41:49.460]  Well, we know that it requires both paragraphs because the second one begins with, and I
[41:49.460 --> 41:51.660]  do further swear.
[41:51.660 --> 41:55.140]  So that's inclusive of requiring the first part.
[41:55.140 --> 41:56.140]  Okay?
[41:56.140 --> 41:57.140]  Okay.
[41:57.140 --> 42:00.260]  So you're saying that second paragraph isn't there?
[42:00.260 --> 42:02.860]  Not at all.
[42:02.860 --> 42:05.620]  And no one administered it to them either.
[42:05.620 --> 42:06.620]  Okay.
[42:06.620 --> 42:09.980]  Then you have a right to challenge any official function they're trying to perform as being
[42:09.980 --> 42:10.980]  invalid.
[42:10.980 --> 42:11.980]  Okay.
[42:11.980 --> 42:15.980]  Because they cannot enact a state law that supersedes the requirements for the state
[42:15.980 --> 42:19.820]  Constitution for what constitutes a proper oath of office.
[42:19.820 --> 42:23.140]  So the first thing you need to do is start looking up California case law and oath of
[42:23.140 --> 42:24.140]  offices.
[42:24.140 --> 42:29.260]  You need to see if the California judiciary tried to overturn the Constitution by fiat
[42:29.260 --> 42:30.980]  and did it through a court opinion.
[42:30.980 --> 42:35.820]  Otherwise, a court opinion should say any oath that doesn't have this is completely invalid,
[42:35.820 --> 42:39.540]  assuming anyone's ever challenged it on these specific grounds.
[42:39.540 --> 42:40.540]  Okay.
[42:40.540 --> 42:45.340]  But if you can even find a case that says this entire oath is required to be administered
[42:45.340 --> 42:52.300]  and it is required to be signed by the person who administered it in their official capacity
[42:52.300 --> 42:57.780]  and that's not there, then that oath is invalid and so is any actions being taken by the individual
[42:57.780 --> 43:04.180]  who made it or I should say improperly made it.
[43:04.180 --> 43:11.820]  And would you say I should get a certified copy of this oath from them?
[43:11.820 --> 43:15.300]  If you're going to use it as evidence in court and you don't want someone to have to come
[43:15.300 --> 43:19.420]  from the records division and testify that it's a true and correct copy, then yeah, you
[43:19.420 --> 43:22.020]  have to get a certified copy.
[43:22.020 --> 43:27.140]  Certified copies are self-authenticated because they bear an official state seal.
[43:27.140 --> 43:28.140]  Okay.
[43:28.140 --> 43:29.140]  Okay.
[43:29.140 --> 43:37.100]  So a certified copy would bear a state seal.
[43:37.100 --> 43:41.740]  It's certified by whoever's making the copy to be true and correct copy of the record.
[43:41.740 --> 43:46.340]  That seal that they have to apply when they make that certification makes itself authenticated.
[43:46.340 --> 43:47.340]  Okay.
[43:47.340 --> 43:48.340]  Great.
[43:48.340 --> 43:49.340]  Okay.
[43:49.340 --> 43:50.340]  Okay.
[43:50.340 --> 43:51.340]  Hang on just a second.
[43:51.340 --> 43:52.340]  Let me take a break here and then we'll get back to you.
[43:52.340 --> 43:53.340]  Okay?
[43:53.340 --> 43:54.340]  All right.
[43:54.340 --> 43:55.340]  All right, folks.
[43:55.340 --> 43:59.260]  We're about to take a top of the hour break, five, one, two, six, four, six, nineteen,
[43:59.260 --> 44:00.260]  eighty-four.
[44:00.260 --> 44:04.020]  I need somebody else to talk to when this call is over, so please give us a call and get
[44:04.020 --> 44:05.020]  a line.
[44:05.020 --> 44:17.460]  We'll be right back after this break.
[44:17.460 --> 44:22.900]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[44:22.900 --> 44:25.700]  because they struggle to understand it.
[44:25.700 --> 44:31.100]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[44:31.100 --> 44:34.340]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[44:34.340 --> 44:36.140]  Here's the recovery version.
[44:36.140 --> 44:42.020]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[44:42.020 --> 44:45.740]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[44:45.740 --> 44:50.740]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[44:50.740 --> 44:55.460]  into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[44:55.460 --> 45:00.620]  Bibles from America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[45:00.620 --> 45:11.020]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[45:11.020 --> 45:15.100]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[45:15.100 --> 45:17.100]  That's freestudybible.com.
[45:17.100 --> 45:27.860]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[45:27.860 --> 45:33.900]  To follow these flashes brought to you by the Lowest Star Lowdowns.
[45:33.900 --> 45:40.300]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce,
[45:40.300 --> 45:48.580]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[45:48.580 --> 45:56.940]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[45:56.940 --> 46:13.380]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[46:13.380 --> 46:19.580]  In history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[46:19.580 --> 46:24.900]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing
[46:24.900 --> 46:31.900]  the 10 and injuring 40.
[46:31.900 --> 46:36.940]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hepin attacks
[46:36.940 --> 46:42.140]  his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, San Antonio
[46:42.140 --> 46:46.260]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they
[46:46.260 --> 46:50.380]  are stipulating that they do not have the time or the lavatory equipment to test the
[46:50.380 --> 46:54.940]  drug for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier
[46:54.940 --> 46:59.660]  this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[46:59.660 --> 47:00.860]  because of the law.
[47:00.860 --> 47:04.740]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[47:04.740 --> 47:09.260]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[47:09.260 --> 47:15.420]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as
[47:15.420 --> 47:21.660]  well as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[47:21.660 --> 47:26.860]  who also stated earlier this month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution
[47:26.860 --> 47:28.940]  of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[47:28.940 --> 47:33.940]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[47:33.940 --> 47:38.420]  in Harris County who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[47:38.420 --> 47:40.660]  illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[47:40.660 --> 47:44.500]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they
[47:44.500 --> 47:49.740]  are charged with.
[47:49.740 --> 47:54.380]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[47:54.380 --> 47:59.540]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[47:59.540 --> 48:05.180]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[48:05.180 --> 48:06.340]  Pacific Ocean.
[48:06.340 --> 48:10.980]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[48:10.980 --> 48:17.220]  its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[48:17.220 --> 48:47.060]  clove.
[48:47.060 --> 49:04.660]  All right folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[49:04.660 --> 49:09.820]  We got four more segments of the show here, so please give us a call and let's talk.
[49:09.820 --> 49:13.900]  All right, that said, let's get back to Bob in California.
[49:13.900 --> 49:18.860]  All right, Bob, go ahead.
[49:18.860 --> 49:25.860]  You know, down after the oath, it was Article 20, not Article 1, Section 3.
[49:25.860 --> 49:30.420]  So it was Article 20, Section 3, in case someone wants to look for it.
[49:30.420 --> 49:37.740]  But then after you go by there, it says, and no other oath, declaration or test shall be
[49:37.740 --> 49:43.140]  required as a qualification of any public office or employment.
[49:43.140 --> 49:55.900]  So they're only taking the first paragraph, it's just like you said then, they're imposters.
[49:55.900 --> 50:02.820]  Yeah, if they did not take the required oath of office, then they cannot be fulfilling the
[50:02.820 --> 50:04.780]  duties of the office.
[50:04.780 --> 50:08.420]  They're acting completely under color of law as nobody.
[50:08.420 --> 50:18.860]  They have usurped a power they do not rightfully possess and or should be charged with impersonating.
[50:18.860 --> 50:23.980]  So would you say it would be a criminal complaint for impersonating a criminal?
[50:23.980 --> 50:24.980]  Well, absolutely.
[50:24.980 --> 50:28.540]  It's absolutely a criminal complaint.
[50:28.540 --> 50:35.020]  Someone just because they're elected, until that oath of office is taken, they do not
[50:35.020 --> 50:39.780]  have the power that belongs to that office, elected or not.
[50:39.780 --> 50:43.220]  That's the whole purpose of having it, okay?
[50:43.220 --> 50:49.140]  Like right here, Section 3, members of the legislature and all public officers and employees,
[50:49.140 --> 50:54.860]  executive, legislative and judicial, except such inferior officers, this would be like
[50:54.860 --> 51:04.380]  cops, firemen, lower level employees, clerks, that kind of thing, as may be, may be by law
[51:04.380 --> 51:11.460]  exempted shall, before they enter upon the duties of their respective offices, take and
[51:11.460 --> 51:14.820]  subscribe the following oath or affirmation.
[51:14.820 --> 51:19.540]  So until that's done, they are not engaging in the duties of their office.
[51:19.540 --> 51:26.300]  They're acting entirely as private individuals using a power they don't rightfully possess.
[51:26.300 --> 51:27.300]  Okay.
[51:27.300 --> 51:36.140]  Again, you need to make sure that the person you're talking about, if they sign the first
[51:36.140 --> 51:42.340]  part of the oath, then most likely the office they're attempting to occupy required the
[51:42.340 --> 51:44.300]  entire oath.
[51:44.300 --> 51:49.580]  But this clearly tells us that lower level functionaries don't have to take this oath.
[51:49.580 --> 51:52.980]  But everybody above them does.
[51:52.980 --> 51:57.500]  So would the policeman be a lower?
[51:57.500 --> 51:59.380]  I don't know.
[51:59.380 --> 52:01.540]  That's why you need to check the case law.
[52:01.540 --> 52:06.620]  The case law should have told you whether or not at some point, a police officer is
[52:06.620 --> 52:08.620]  a lower level functionary.
[52:08.620 --> 52:09.620]  Okay.
[52:09.620 --> 52:10.620]  Okay.
[52:10.620 --> 52:12.180]  I'll look into that.
[52:12.180 --> 52:18.420]  Because this specifically says, except such inferior officers and employees, well, what
[52:18.420 --> 52:23.300]  does the law consider an inferior officer or employee?
[52:23.300 --> 52:25.020]  Okay.
[52:25.020 --> 52:28.420]  And the courts are the ones that's going to tell you that if there's no specific statute
[52:28.420 --> 52:30.420]  that does.
[52:30.420 --> 52:31.420]  Okay.
[52:31.420 --> 52:32.420]  Okay.
[52:32.420 --> 52:39.100]  So you need to find court opinions from the higher courts in California that speak specifically
[52:39.100 --> 52:41.900]  to Article 20, Section 3.
[52:41.900 --> 52:42.900]  Okay.
[52:42.900 --> 52:44.700]  I'll do that.
[52:44.700 --> 52:46.700]  That's where your research will focus.
[52:46.700 --> 52:51.540]  Court cases dealing with the interpretation of Article 20, Section 3 of the California
[52:51.540 --> 52:54.140]  Constitution.
[52:54.140 --> 52:58.220]  The article you've been talking about.
[52:58.220 --> 53:00.260]  The one I wrote or this one?
[53:00.260 --> 53:01.260]  Yes.
[53:01.260 --> 53:02.260]  Yeah.
[53:02.260 --> 53:03.260]  Yeah.
[53:03.260 --> 53:04.260]  The one you wrote.
[53:04.260 --> 53:05.260]  Uh-huh.
[53:05.260 --> 53:06.260]  The one you've been talking about from the start of the show.
[53:06.260 --> 53:08.380]  You say you've posted on your leaks.
[53:08.380 --> 53:10.660]  Well, I've been talking about two different things.
[53:10.660 --> 53:16.460]  One was a comment I posted on a YouTube video that leads into the same subject matter I'm
[53:16.460 --> 53:18.620]  talking about in the article I'm going to post.
[53:18.620 --> 53:22.020]  So I've talked about two different things since the start of the show.
[53:22.020 --> 53:26.020]  I began with the comment and the last thing I talked about was the article that will be
[53:26.020 --> 53:27.020]  going up.
[53:27.020 --> 53:29.220]  But what is it you want to know about it?
[53:29.220 --> 53:33.500]  Well, will that be on Tau of Law?
[53:33.500 --> 53:35.860]  That'll be on Tau of Law, yes.
[53:35.860 --> 53:36.860]  Tau of Law.
[53:36.860 --> 53:37.860]  Okay.
[53:37.860 --> 53:44.580]  Because I don't do Facebook, so I know you put stuff on Facebook, so I'll look forward
[53:44.580 --> 53:46.700]  to it on Tau of Law.
[53:46.700 --> 53:47.700]  Yeah.
[53:47.700 --> 53:53.260]  Hey, Eddie, I really appreciate you and thanks for everything.
[53:53.260 --> 53:54.260]  Yes, sir.
[53:54.260 --> 53:55.260]  Appreciate you calling.
[53:55.260 --> 53:56.260]  Thank you.
[53:56.260 --> 53:57.260]  All right.
[53:57.260 --> 53:58.260]  Bye.
[53:58.260 --> 53:59.260]  Bye.
[53:59.260 --> 54:00.260]  Bye.
[54:00.260 --> 54:01.260]  All right.
[54:01.260 --> 54:03.380]  Well, hopefully we helped out Bob in California.
[54:03.380 --> 54:06.100]  Now let's see about Adam in Texas.
[54:06.100 --> 54:08.380]  Adam, what do you got?
[54:08.380 --> 54:10.780]  Hey, Eddie, how's it going?
[54:10.780 --> 54:12.260]  It's going all right.
[54:12.260 --> 54:15.060]  How's things treating you?
[54:15.060 --> 54:16.060]  Pretty good.
[54:16.060 --> 54:18.060]  Pretty good down here.
[54:18.060 --> 54:27.980]  I wanted to go over and delve into Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 2, specifically
[54:27.980 --> 54:37.980]  2.03 and down where it starts with neglect of duty and, you know, it says, you know,
[54:37.980 --> 54:44.780]  get out the attorney for the state has a duty to, you know, if a neglect of duty is reported
[54:44.780 --> 54:50.500]  and is made known to have a duty to turn it into an information and either give it to
[54:50.500 --> 54:54.420]  the district court or the grand jury.
[54:54.420 --> 55:03.700]  Now, it says in there, it talks about when a complaint can't be reduced to an information.
[55:03.700 --> 55:09.340]  They're supposed to give it to the grand jury as opposed to the district court.
[55:09.340 --> 55:17.700]  In what circumstance would there ever be where an information can't be presented based off
[55:17.700 --> 55:21.980]  of criminal affidavit presented by a citizen?
[55:21.980 --> 55:28.220]  Well, it would depend on who you submitted it to.
[55:28.220 --> 55:32.860]  Technically speaking, under Texas law, the county or district attorney themselves are
[55:32.860 --> 55:35.700]  the only ones that can sign information.
[55:35.700 --> 55:41.860]  The Texas courts have screwed the pooch royally when they say that an assistant prosecutor
[55:41.860 --> 55:43.340]  can sign an information.
[55:43.340 --> 55:44.460]  They can't.
[55:44.460 --> 55:50.700]  The law of nowhere does the law authorize the, or the Constitution for that matter,
[55:50.700 --> 55:54.340]  authorize the signing of an information by an assistant prosecutor.
[55:54.340 --> 55:55.340]  Okay?
[55:55.340 --> 55:56.340]  Gotcha.
[55:56.340 --> 56:02.340]  So, if you turn it into an assistant prosecutor and it's something that needs to be dealt with
[56:02.340 --> 56:05.180]  right away, they can't reduce it to an information.
[56:05.180 --> 56:09.100]  They don't have the legal authority to do that in Texas.
[56:09.100 --> 56:10.100]  Okay.
[56:10.100 --> 56:13.260]  All right.
[56:13.260 --> 56:20.220]  But as far as what those other occasions could be, it'd be really hard to think of one unless
[56:20.220 --> 56:25.340]  you took it directly to a grand jury yourself or directly to a magistrate yourself.
[56:25.340 --> 56:29.340]  In those instances, they wouldn't be reduced to an information.
[56:29.340 --> 56:32.340]  Yeah.
[56:32.340 --> 56:38.140]  Well, if you go through the county or district attorney, then I don't see where they don't
[56:38.140 --> 56:41.780]  have an obligation to reduce it to an information.
[56:41.780 --> 56:44.460]  Me neither.
[56:44.460 --> 56:49.300]  What I got was the response from the county attorney when I took it to him for a neglected
[56:49.300 --> 56:57.180]  duty on a local J.P., and he sat there and he said, well, I can't do anything.
[56:57.180 --> 56:58.180]  Why not?
[56:58.180 --> 57:01.660]  Well, I have to have an investigation by a law enforcement officer and his whole...
[57:01.660 --> 57:03.460]  No, he doesn't.
[57:03.460 --> 57:08.460]  That right there should get him a bar grievance and a charge submitted directly to a grand
[57:08.460 --> 57:14.100]  jury that he's not doing his job in compliance with Chapter 2.
[57:14.100 --> 57:15.660]  That's in the works.
[57:15.660 --> 57:16.660]  That's going to happen.
[57:16.660 --> 57:18.460]  But yeah, that's usually their excuse.
[57:18.460 --> 57:20.980]  They'll say, well, I don't know if what you say is true.
[57:20.980 --> 57:26.020]  The whole purpose of the complaint is to initiate the investigation.
[57:26.020 --> 57:29.860]  And that's what the grand jury or the magistrate can direct.
[57:29.860 --> 57:34.540]  If it goes to the magistrate, the magistrate could forward it to the grand jury and let
[57:34.540 --> 57:36.260]  them do the investigation.
[57:36.260 --> 57:40.260]  If it's taken directly to the grand jury, they can order the investigation.
[57:40.260 --> 57:44.780]  They don't have to have a law enforcement officer doing anything first.
[57:44.780 --> 57:47.020]  Nowhere does the law say that.
[57:47.020 --> 57:48.020]  Correct.
[57:48.020 --> 57:54.420]  So let me clear this up.
[57:54.420 --> 58:00.380]  When there's a complaint on a public official, even though it's a misdemeanor, does it have
[58:00.380 --> 58:01.380]  to be...
[58:01.380 --> 58:03.940]  Does it have to go to the grand jury?
[58:03.940 --> 58:04.940]  Can grand juries...
[58:04.940 --> 58:07.940]  Can only grand juries investigate public officials?
[58:07.940 --> 58:10.780]  Well, of course not.
[58:10.780 --> 58:16.100]  The Texas Department of Public Safety and the Texas Rangers are supposed to who are
[58:16.100 --> 58:19.940]  authorized by law to investigate public officials.
[58:19.940 --> 58:26.260]  So the grand jury could say the county attorney did his job, according to 2.03, and didn't
[58:26.260 --> 58:32.460]  make excuses like a punk and sent it to either the district court or the grand jury.
[58:32.460 --> 58:38.460]  The grand jury could request an investigation by the Department of Public Safety and the
[58:38.460 --> 58:39.460]  Rangers.
[58:39.460 --> 58:40.460]  Correct.
[58:40.460 --> 58:41.460]  That's their job.
[58:41.460 --> 58:42.460]  Right.
[58:42.460 --> 58:51.140]  No, it seems to me that the way the law is written, there's built-in checks, check valves.
[58:51.140 --> 58:52.940]  Yeah, there is.
[58:52.940 --> 58:57.660]  And these people won't turn any of them because it's liable to spray back in their face when
[58:57.660 --> 58:59.180]  it's all over.
[58:59.180 --> 59:00.980]  That's why they won't do it.
[59:00.980 --> 59:02.980]  That's right.
[59:02.980 --> 59:08.420]  If they turn that valve to investigate one of their own, and one of their own has been
[59:08.420 --> 59:12.260]  involved with them in something shady somewhere else, guess what that person's going to wind
[59:12.260 --> 59:13.260]  up doing?
[59:13.260 --> 59:15.780]  They're going to pull them in with them, aren't they?
[59:15.780 --> 59:20.940]  So to head that off at the pass, I'm just not going to do nothing.
[59:20.940 --> 59:25.460]  Well, I got that county attorney on video.
[59:25.460 --> 59:33.620]  I spoke with 50 Minutes and let's watch him chuck his responsibilities.
[59:33.620 --> 59:34.620]  I'm going to get them.
[59:34.620 --> 59:36.180]  I'm going to get after them.
[59:36.180 --> 59:37.340]  But yeah, there's no...
[59:37.340 --> 59:38.940]  I found no case ball either.
[59:38.940 --> 59:46.940]  I mean, there's case ball dealing with 2.03B, but there's nothing that I found dealing specifically
[59:46.940 --> 59:53.980]  with 2.03A, which at the beginning, the attorney for the state has a duty to report to a public
[59:53.980 --> 59:57.180]  official when it's made known to them.
[59:57.180 --> 59:59.300]  And there's probably a reason for that too.
[59:59.300 --> 01:00:04.620]  You've got to remember that 90% of the judges sitting on the bench used to be that county
[01:00:04.620 --> 01:00:07.780]  or district attorney.
[01:00:07.780 --> 01:00:13.340]  They weren't going to turn on their own any more than the one that's there right now.
[01:00:13.340 --> 01:00:19.020]  Therein lies the problem with letting this system police itself.
[01:00:19.020 --> 01:00:20.020]  Right.
[01:00:20.020 --> 01:00:26.980]  Yeah, the idea is that, you know, if you go down into Chapter 3 of the Code of Cromber
[01:00:26.980 --> 01:00:27.980]  of Seizure, it...
[01:00:27.980 --> 01:00:36.620]  I believe it's 3.03, which is right before 3.04, which describes official misconduct.
[01:00:36.620 --> 01:00:45.100]  But 3.03 defines the term officer as used in the Code of Cromber of Seizure and it specifically
[01:00:45.100 --> 01:00:53.300]  says that an officer in relation to 2.03 an officer is a magistrate or a law enforcement
[01:00:53.300 --> 01:00:54.300]  officer.
[01:00:54.300 --> 01:00:55.300]  That's what they're talking about.
[01:00:55.300 --> 01:01:05.340]  And the reason that law enforcement officers and magistrates are held to this higher standard
[01:01:05.340 --> 01:01:10.620]  of accountability as far as when a complaint made against them for neglect of duty is because
[01:01:10.620 --> 01:01:14.820]  magistrates and police officers are the ones who deal directly with the public as far as
[01:01:14.820 --> 01:01:17.340]  the application enforcement Code of Cromber of Seizure.
[01:01:17.340 --> 01:01:23.660]  So, of course, they're going to be the ones that we want to make sure there's a check valve
[01:01:23.660 --> 01:01:27.540]  in place so that if they mess up, we can go back on.
[01:01:27.540 --> 01:01:33.300]  Yeah, but notice that in no instance are either of those entities given discretion about sending
[01:01:33.300 --> 01:01:35.540]  it to the magistrate or grand jury.
[01:01:35.540 --> 01:01:36.780]  See, that's the thing.
[01:01:36.780 --> 01:01:41.540]  They're saying they have to have an investigation before they can take the complaint.
[01:01:41.540 --> 01:01:43.860]  That's not what the law says.
[01:01:43.860 --> 01:01:48.820]  And the law does not even mention investigation before the complaint is submitted.
[01:01:48.820 --> 01:01:54.780]  The law says when it's done, you will do this and then you will send it to either the grand
[01:01:54.780 --> 01:01:58.940]  jury or the magistrate, depending upon what it is.
[01:01:58.940 --> 01:02:00.180]  That's right.
[01:02:00.180 --> 01:02:08.180]  The investigation will then be pursued from that point, not prior.
[01:02:08.180 --> 01:02:09.180]  That's a problem.
[01:02:09.180 --> 01:02:10.180]  100%.
[01:02:10.180 --> 01:02:14.660]  This isn't the problem with them interpreting the law how they want.
[01:02:14.660 --> 01:02:19.180]  This goes to exactly what the article I was writing was about, ignorance, incompetence
[01:02:19.180 --> 01:02:20.180]  or corruption.
[01:02:20.180 --> 01:02:21.180]  And it's always corruption.
[01:02:21.180 --> 01:02:31.180]  Hang on just a second, man, we'll be right back after the break.
[01:02:31.180 --> 01:02:36.980]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[01:02:36.980 --> 01:02:37.980]  Gunworks.
[01:02:37.980 --> 01:02:41.620]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:02:41.620 --> 01:02:43.420]  Any amount is appreciated.
[01:02:43.420 --> 01:02:45.260]  Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[01:02:45.260 --> 01:02:51.660]  Through Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR15.
[01:02:51.660 --> 01:02:54.220]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:02:54.220 --> 01:02:57.420]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:02:57.420 --> 01:03:02.980]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:03:02.980 --> 01:03:06.380]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:03:06.380 --> 01:03:11.300]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can
[01:03:11.300 --> 01:03:15.660]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:03:15.660 --> 01:03:18.540]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:03:18.540 --> 01:03:22.660]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:03:22.660 --> 01:03:27.820]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:03:27.820 --> 01:03:32.860]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:03:32.860 --> 01:03:36.540]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[01:03:36.540 --> 01:03:41.340]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can
[01:03:41.340 --> 01:03:42.340]  win, too.
[01:03:42.340 --> 01:03:46.820]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:03:46.820 --> 01:03:52.540]  civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer
[01:03:52.540 --> 01:03:57.180]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:03:57.180 --> 01:04:01.380]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:04:01.380 --> 01:04:06.500]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:04:06.500 --> 01:04:08.500]  Federal consultation is available as well.
[01:04:08.500 --> 01:04:14.180]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[01:04:14.180 --> 01:04:17.180]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[01:04:17.180 --> 01:04:26.740]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[01:04:26.740 --> 01:04:27.740]  now.
[01:04:27.740 --> 01:04:56.140]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:04:56.140 --> 01:05:01.140]  This is rule of law radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:05:01.140 --> 01:05:07.140]  All right, now let's get back to Adam in Texas.
[01:05:07.140 --> 01:05:10.140]  All right, Adam, any other questions on that?
[01:05:10.140 --> 01:05:16.140]  No, no, I mean, you pretty much, I mean, that's my, that's my take on it.
[01:05:16.140 --> 01:05:21.860]  I've been, I've been looking into it and studying it for a while and I mean, it's obvious because
[01:05:21.860 --> 01:05:26.060]  the way our law is set up, I mean, take for instance, you know, we're dealing with officers
[01:05:26.060 --> 01:05:27.860]  as defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:05:27.860 --> 01:05:34.380]  That means magistrates and law enforcement, well, you know, according to the wisdom of
[01:05:34.380 --> 01:05:39.840]  the attorneys for the state, you know, what they're saying is that, we'll say I had a
[01:05:39.840 --> 01:05:45.300]  complaint on a law enforcement officer for neglect of duty for official misconduct.
[01:05:45.300 --> 01:05:50.260]  Basically, their stance is, well, the only way to do it is to get that same law enforcement
[01:05:50.260 --> 01:05:55.940]  agency to investigate themselves, but that's just not the way it works because, you know,
[01:05:55.940 --> 01:06:01.940]  the people who are forefathers are a little bit smarter than we are now, I think, but
[01:06:01.940 --> 01:06:06.420]  the way they wrote it was, I know 10 kids smarter than half the people we're having
[01:06:06.420 --> 01:06:07.420]  to deal with.
[01:06:07.420 --> 01:06:16.420]  You know, so they gave us multiple avenues to go about holding our public officials accountable.
[01:06:16.420 --> 01:06:20.220]  You know, of course, you don't have to go to the same police station to file a criminal
[01:06:20.220 --> 01:06:22.780]  complaint on an officer that works for that police station.
[01:06:22.780 --> 01:06:24.340]  That's, that's ridiculous.
[01:06:24.340 --> 01:06:27.020]  That's not how it, of course, that's not how it works.
[01:06:27.020 --> 01:06:30.660]  So we can, and we can go to the magistrates or we can go directly to the county or district
[01:06:30.660 --> 01:06:32.860]  attorney and, you know, each incident.
[01:06:32.860 --> 01:06:35.100]  We can even go directly to the grand jury.
[01:06:35.100 --> 01:06:36.100]  Don't forget that.
[01:06:36.100 --> 01:06:37.100]  Yes.
[01:06:37.100 --> 01:06:41.540]  When these lower functionaries won't do their job, then we add them to the complaint and
[01:06:41.540 --> 01:06:44.540]  go over their head to the grand jury.
[01:06:44.540 --> 01:06:45.540]  That's right.
[01:06:45.540 --> 01:06:48.540]  It's, we're, we really do have the power.
[01:06:48.540 --> 01:06:50.500]  The law is actually written in our favor.
[01:06:50.500 --> 01:06:54.580]  It's just nobody wants to go by it, by it properly, apply it properly, but-
[01:06:54.580 --> 01:06:58.780]  Well, of course not, because then that puts power in our hands that they have worked so
[01:06:58.780 --> 01:07:01.740]  desperately hard to hide or take away.
[01:07:01.740 --> 01:07:02.740]  Yeah.
[01:07:02.740 --> 01:07:08.980]  That's the whole goal here, to make us appear powerless and themselves omnipotent.
[01:07:08.980 --> 01:07:09.980]  Yeah.
[01:07:09.980 --> 01:07:14.820]  Well, hey, I got some good news.
[01:07:14.820 --> 01:07:18.540]  Unless you got another caller that wants to take questions.
[01:07:18.540 --> 01:07:20.980]  I've got one we hadn't talked to in a while.
[01:07:20.980 --> 01:07:22.780]  I'm going to get to him.
[01:07:22.780 --> 01:07:24.940]  We allow it to be on for a while, we get on with Olivier.
[01:07:24.940 --> 01:07:25.940]  He hadn't called in a while.
[01:07:25.940 --> 01:07:27.420]  I want to know how he's doing.
[01:07:27.420 --> 01:07:28.420]  Oh, man.
[01:07:28.420 --> 01:07:32.020]  So if you want to take this time to ask me whatever you got, let's do that real quick,
[01:07:32.020 --> 01:07:35.900]  because when I get on with Olivier, he may not disappear before the end of the show.
[01:07:35.900 --> 01:07:42.660]  Well, I just wanted to add that, you know, I've been listening to you and Randy for a
[01:07:42.660 --> 01:07:43.660]  long time.
[01:07:43.660 --> 01:07:45.140]  I've met you personally.
[01:07:45.140 --> 01:07:50.460]  You probably don't remember me, but you were the one who really got me started and got
[01:07:50.460 --> 01:07:56.140]  my brain going and learning how to, you know, learning how to learn and get going with this
[01:07:56.140 --> 01:07:57.140]  stuff.
[01:07:57.140 --> 01:08:03.420]  So anyway, one of the JPs I had a battle with back in 2016.
[01:08:03.420 --> 01:08:08.020]  I took, you know, you started me on down the right path and I'm telling you, I'll
[01:08:08.020 --> 01:08:17.140]  beat them and several years went by and back last fall, fall of 2020, just for kicks, because
[01:08:17.140 --> 01:08:21.500]  you know, like Randy said, the best fights, the one you go pick, well, just for kicks.
[01:08:21.500 --> 01:08:28.380]  I went in there and I started digging on and I found out that he had neglected to file
[01:08:28.380 --> 01:08:34.460]  his mandatory collections reports with the County Commissioners Court for the previous
[01:08:34.460 --> 01:08:38.300]  10 years.
[01:08:38.300 --> 01:08:39.300]  Oh, goody.
[01:08:39.300 --> 01:08:40.300]  Yeah, it was awesome.
[01:08:40.300 --> 01:08:41.300]  I do.
[01:08:41.300 --> 01:08:42.300]  I find something.
[01:08:42.300 --> 01:08:44.500]  That's the one thing I want to add to these people.
[01:08:44.500 --> 01:08:46.860]  You know, you've got some public official that does wrong.
[01:08:46.860 --> 01:08:51.260]  I guarantee, you know, there's about an 80, 90% chance you start digging on them.
[01:08:51.260 --> 01:08:52.460]  They're messing something up.
[01:08:52.460 --> 01:08:53.460]  There's something they're not.
[01:08:53.460 --> 01:08:54.460]  Yeah.
[01:08:54.460 --> 01:08:56.460]  And it's almost always something serious.
[01:08:56.460 --> 01:08:57.460]  Yeah.
[01:08:57.460 --> 01:09:01.940]  So, I mean, it's easy to go pick a fight with these jerks.
[01:09:01.940 --> 01:09:11.500]  But anyway, I got a man and I brought it up and I started messing with him and he resigned
[01:09:11.500 --> 01:09:14.620]  January 31st prematurely.
[01:09:14.620 --> 01:09:20.380]  All right, that works.
[01:09:20.380 --> 01:09:21.380]  That works.
[01:09:21.380 --> 01:09:22.380]  Yeah.
[01:09:22.380 --> 01:09:23.380]  Of course it does.
[01:09:23.380 --> 01:09:24.380]  But people need to get more involved in this stuff.
[01:09:24.380 --> 01:09:28.900]  I mean, this country, I don't think we can replicate it starting from scratch.
[01:09:28.900 --> 01:09:30.940]  We've got to hold on to what we've got.
[01:09:30.940 --> 01:09:31.940]  Yeah.
[01:09:31.940 --> 01:09:36.700]  And we've got to fix as good as possible what's broken with the tools we have because we are
[01:09:36.700 --> 01:09:40.420]  not, those idiots trying to say, I want to fix this from the inside, don't know what
[01:09:40.420 --> 01:09:42.540]  the hell they're talking about.
[01:09:42.540 --> 01:09:45.700]  You cannot fix a broken machine from the inside.
[01:09:45.700 --> 01:09:52.940]  You just cannot do it because everything about it is broken is going to hinder everything
[01:09:52.940 --> 01:09:55.820]  that you attempt to do to fix it.
[01:09:55.820 --> 01:10:02.940]  And once you're inside of it, you're in it to a point where there's always someone beside
[01:10:02.940 --> 01:10:08.060]  you or above you that can block you or do worse to you.
[01:10:08.060 --> 01:10:12.180]  Ask Serpico about that.
[01:10:12.180 --> 01:10:17.860]  He fled the country and had to live outside the United States for a very long time after
[01:10:17.860 --> 01:10:25.740]  being a New York cop because his own department was trying to kill him because he would not
[01:10:25.740 --> 01:10:27.780]  partake in the corruption.
[01:10:27.780 --> 01:10:30.380]  And he was exposing those who did.
[01:10:30.380 --> 01:10:32.100]  They don't like it.
[01:10:32.100 --> 01:10:35.940]  You will not fix any of this from the inside.
[01:10:35.940 --> 01:10:39.220]  Yeah, their blue line really is thin.
[01:10:39.220 --> 01:10:40.700]  It's not very thick, is it?
[01:10:40.700 --> 01:10:42.340]  Because they'll burn on each other very quickly.
[01:10:42.340 --> 01:10:46.060]  Oh, in a heartbeat if they feel like they're personally threatened by something they're
[01:10:46.060 --> 01:10:47.060]  doing.
[01:10:47.060 --> 01:10:48.060]  Yeah.
[01:10:48.060 --> 01:10:51.260]  They're tied together with string.
[01:10:51.260 --> 01:10:55.220]  Well, hey, man, you're right, Olivier, we've been here for a long time and we'll kick it
[01:10:55.220 --> 01:10:56.220]  over.
[01:10:56.220 --> 01:10:57.220]  All right, man.
[01:10:57.220 --> 01:10:58.220]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[01:10:58.220 --> 01:10:59.220]  Let me know.
[01:10:59.220 --> 01:11:00.220]  Yes, sir.
[01:11:00.220 --> 01:11:01.220]  Have a good day.
[01:11:01.220 --> 01:11:02.220]  You too.
[01:11:02.220 --> 01:11:03.220]  All right.
[01:11:03.220 --> 01:11:04.220]  Mr. Olivier.
[01:11:04.220 --> 01:11:05.220]  Olivier, are you there?
[01:11:05.220 --> 01:11:06.220]  You're on the board, but I need you to talk.
[01:11:06.220 --> 01:11:24.060]  All right, Olivier, if you can hear me, I need you to like either unmute or call me back
[01:11:24.060 --> 01:11:27.060]  because you got dropped.
[01:11:27.060 --> 01:11:34.420]  All right, well, I give you a minute or two and see what happens.
[01:11:34.420 --> 01:11:37.500]  I'll leave you unmuted in case you figure out what's going on.
[01:11:37.500 --> 01:11:41.420]  If nothing else, hang up and call me back, brother.
[01:11:41.420 --> 01:11:42.420]  Okay.
[01:11:42.420 --> 01:11:47.660]  So, folks, right there, you have an individual calling in to let you know that he's managed
[01:11:47.660 --> 01:11:52.100]  to accomplish a lot by what he's learned from this show and the rest of the shows on
[01:11:52.100 --> 01:11:53.100]  our network.
[01:11:53.100 --> 01:11:57.860]  He's taken the information that we provide to you and he's done something useful with
[01:11:57.860 --> 01:12:02.660]  it, and because of that, he prevailed.
[01:12:02.660 --> 01:12:04.340]  He's not the only one that's done it.
[01:12:04.340 --> 01:12:08.660]  He's not going to remain the only one that does it.
[01:12:08.660 --> 01:12:16.140]  But we are only going to get as far as people will take us because when you will not fight
[01:12:16.140 --> 01:12:22.940]  for yourself, how can you say you will fight for someone else?
[01:12:22.940 --> 01:12:27.340]  Who would fight harder for you than you would?
[01:12:27.340 --> 01:12:29.740]  I've always said nobody will.
[01:12:29.740 --> 01:12:35.980]  You will fight harder for your case than anyone else will ever attempt to fight.
[01:12:35.980 --> 01:12:38.180]  That's why it's important that you learn how to do this.
[01:12:38.180 --> 01:12:43.020]  That's why it's important you don't trust an attorney who will do nothing but lie to
[01:12:43.020 --> 01:12:46.260]  you and throw you under the bus.
[01:12:46.260 --> 01:12:51.380]  Now, here's something I did not get to tell you last Monday because I wasn't able to do
[01:12:51.380 --> 01:12:52.460]  the show last Monday.
[01:12:52.460 --> 01:12:57.140]  I wound up with a respiratory infection from a case of acid reflux.
[01:12:57.140 --> 01:13:01.700]  I had a dinner that was a lot spicier than it appeared to be when I consumed it, and
[01:13:01.700 --> 01:13:03.900]  it got to me a lot later.
[01:13:03.900 --> 01:13:14.620]  But anyway, that aside, Monday, I got a case or helped get a case that has been going on
[01:13:14.620 --> 01:13:20.260]  for over five years.
[01:13:20.260 --> 01:13:29.700]  It is a felony drug possession case, and it's against a young lady in San Antonio.
[01:13:29.700 --> 01:13:33.900]  What happened was that there, and I told you all about this case before on the show and
[01:13:33.900 --> 01:13:39.940]  all the sways, they were messing up at the time, but now we've got an even better thing
[01:13:39.940 --> 01:13:42.380]  going on here.
[01:13:42.380 --> 01:13:47.300]  But the San Antonio Police Department was working with a confidential informant and using that
[01:13:47.300 --> 01:13:54.580]  confidential informant to plant humongous amounts of drugs on persons via their cars
[01:13:54.580 --> 01:14:01.380]  or in their homes, and then informing on those people so the police could get a warrant and
[01:14:01.380 --> 01:14:08.140]  raid their house or their car, and when they did, they would go to directly where this
[01:14:08.140 --> 01:14:12.740]  large box of contraband was left hidden in the house.
[01:14:12.740 --> 01:14:19.460]  Now, how would the cops know where to go without going to any other part of the house and doing
[01:14:19.460 --> 01:14:25.180]  any kind of search if it was not for the fact that the confidential informant knew exactly
[01:14:25.180 --> 01:14:29.260]  where to tell them to find it, okay?
[01:14:29.260 --> 01:14:33.220]  That's a big red flag right there.
[01:14:33.220 --> 01:14:38.460]  Cops have never been there, they conduct absolutely no search, they walk into the front door,
[01:14:38.460 --> 01:14:43.020]  save a warrant around, don't let anybody read the warrant, but then they go to the exact
[01:14:43.020 --> 01:14:49.220]  room, the exact place, to the exact box that contains the drugs that were planted by their
[01:14:49.220 --> 01:14:54.700]  confidential informant and then charge the homeowner with a legal possession of over
[01:14:54.700 --> 01:15:01.740]  400 grams of methamphetamine.
[01:15:01.740 --> 01:15:08.060]  This would have sent this girl to prison for 15 or more years, ruined her life forever
[01:15:08.060 --> 01:15:09.620]  with a felony conviction.
[01:15:09.620 --> 01:15:15.100]  Hang on just a minute and we will get to more of this on the other side, y'all hang
[01:15:15.100 --> 01:15:16.100]  on.
[01:15:16.100 --> 01:15:19.100]  By the way, 512-646-1984.
[01:15:19.100 --> 01:15:31.900]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number,
[01:15:31.900 --> 01:15:35.500]  and date of birth, but you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:15:35.500 --> 01:15:39.100]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll see more in just a moment.
[01:16:06.500 --> 01:16:10.260]  StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:16:10.260 --> 01:16:14.980]  Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere, but just because a piece of paper asks for information
[01:16:14.980 --> 01:16:16.500]  doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:16:16.500 --> 01:16:21.740]  I lay blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable and
[01:16:21.740 --> 01:16:23.820]  usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:16:23.820 --> 01:16:28.380]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory
[01:16:28.380 --> 01:16:32.700]  for employment or government requirement, and I won't give my phone number to a company
[01:16:32.700 --> 01:16:36.860]  or an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare.
[01:16:36.860 --> 01:16:41.980]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:16:41.980 --> 01:16:45.740]  It's like exercising a muscle, it gets easier the more you do it.
[01:16:45.740 --> 01:16:49.740]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:16:58.740 --> 01:16:59.740]  I lost my son.
[01:16:59.740 --> 01:17:00.740]  My nephew.
[01:17:00.740 --> 01:17:01.740]  My uncle.
[01:17:01.740 --> 01:17:02.740]  My uncle.
[01:17:02.740 --> 01:17:03.740]  My nephew.
[01:17:03.740 --> 01:17:04.740]  My son.
[01:17:04.740 --> 01:17:05.740]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:17:05.740 --> 01:17:33.740]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:17:33.740 --> 01:17:40.740]  If we are to be in public service in America, we live in a free society and we're going
[01:17:40.740 --> 01:17:47.740]  to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:17:47.740 --> 01:17:54.740]  Among those rights, the right to act in our own private capacity and, most importantly,
[01:17:54.740 --> 01:17:57.740]  the right to do process of law.
[01:17:57.740 --> 01:18:00.720]  comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what the
[01:18:00.720 --> 01:18:04.500]  process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of
[01:18:04.500 --> 01:18:08.060]  this valuable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your
[01:18:08.060 --> 01:18:11.260]  copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas
[01:18:11.260 --> 01:18:14.660]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original
[01:18:14.660 --> 01:18:18.220]  2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource
[01:18:18.220 --> 01:18:21.020]  material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[01:18:21.020 --> 01:18:25.140]  from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have free
[01:18:25.140 --> 01:18:28.580]  society we all want and deserve.
[01:18:28.580 --> 01:18:48.580]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at MilogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:18:58.580 --> 01:19:12.260]  Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. Let's see, we got about a half an hour left calling
[01:19:12.260 --> 01:19:18.660]  number 512-646-1984. If I cannot get Olivier to come on here and talk,
[01:19:18.660 --> 01:19:29.380]  Olivier are you there? Hey, there's a blast from the past. I'm glad to hear
[01:19:29.380 --> 01:19:33.460]  you're alive and well. I've been wondering about you for weeks and weeks
[01:19:33.460 --> 01:19:36.860]  wondering what the hell happened to you man because we ain't heard nothing out
[01:19:36.860 --> 01:19:45.580]  of you in what three years? Yeah, working the bugs out figuring out how to work
[01:19:45.580 --> 01:19:52.860]  with the court tonight. Through all the movements and everything that I've been
[01:19:52.860 --> 01:20:00.780]  going through, I wanted to talk to you about the, it's called the
[01:20:00.780 --> 01:20:10.860]  Territory Judgment. Right. I wrote a suit in the federal court about the
[01:20:10.860 --> 01:20:17.180]  Territory Judgment and I got just, I got word back from the court you know I
[01:20:17.180 --> 01:20:22.700]  wrote it, I wrote certain things wrong or but as I was reading I thought it was a
[01:20:22.700 --> 01:20:29.380]  dismissal but it was, I realized that it was more of an instruction on how to
[01:20:29.380 --> 01:20:35.980]  correct. Right and then through that instruction on how to correct it led me
[01:20:35.980 --> 01:20:43.340]  through the, it led me through the, the Territory Judgment and I didn't realize
[01:20:43.340 --> 01:20:49.860]  that there was two levels of it and now that it sent me directly into that
[01:20:49.860 --> 01:20:54.380]  direction because I was trying to use the federal suit to a federal, the
[01:20:54.380 --> 01:20:59.660]  Territory Judgment to stop something that occurs through the state and they
[01:20:59.660 --> 01:21:03.500]  were telling me that they didn't have jurisdiction. The only jurisdiction that
[01:21:03.500 --> 01:21:08.060]  they had was to, they do have a jurisdiction to clarify but since I
[01:21:08.060 --> 01:21:14.660]  wanted, I wanted them to act in another manner that it would be, there would be
[01:21:14.660 --> 01:21:21.580]  interjected in the state's right to address constitutional questions. Right.
[01:21:21.580 --> 01:21:27.460]  So once I realized that, so when, then I went and studied the state that's the
[01:21:27.460 --> 01:21:32.660]  Territory Judgment and then I realized like the state the Territory Judgment is
[01:21:32.660 --> 01:21:42.300]  a lot more intrusive and a lot more powerful than the federal so. Well yeah,
[01:21:42.300 --> 01:21:46.700]  the federal, the federal can only intercede when there's a federal issue in
[01:21:46.700 --> 01:21:51.060]  the case. There has to be a federal question before the federal courts have
[01:21:51.060 --> 01:21:55.940]  any way to get into it and the thing about it is, like I told people before,
[01:21:55.940 --> 01:22:03.860]  the federal constitution is the floor of your rights. It's the point no one can
[01:22:03.860 --> 01:22:13.620]  go below but the state constitution is the ceiling. Okay, in the state no one
[01:22:13.620 --> 01:22:20.380]  can go below the ceiling instead of the floor. See what I'm saying? So your state
[01:22:20.380 --> 01:22:25.900]  remedy under your state constitution versus your state laws is always more
[01:22:25.900 --> 01:22:29.380]  intrusive and more powerful than it would be at the federal level for the
[01:22:29.380 --> 01:22:38.700]  same thing. Right, so okay, but now I'm going through this now realizing like
[01:22:38.700 --> 01:22:49.660]  okay, but through learning how to do this is I'm learning that the other through
[01:22:49.660 --> 01:22:56.340]  the Declaratory Judgment there's other things that can be that people can
[01:22:56.340 --> 01:23:01.780]  address legal issues that they can address through the Declaratory Judgment
[01:23:01.780 --> 01:23:11.420]  and still get a result that is meaningful. Yeah, favorable to the outcome
[01:23:11.420 --> 01:23:17.540]  they desire. Right, and I've been reading a lot of the appellate decisions on the
[01:23:17.540 --> 01:23:24.460]  Declaratory Judgment is as far as floor they are very thorough about void
[01:23:24.460 --> 01:23:29.420]  for vagueness and void statutes and things like that. If you have your marbles
[01:23:29.420 --> 01:23:37.100]  lined up they're ruling in favor so I'm getting prepared to file a void
[01:23:37.100 --> 01:23:48.460]  for vagueness on the phase to maintain lane and a driver's license statute. One
[01:23:48.460 --> 01:23:53.540]  of the federal courts wrote me back. Federal judges wrote me back and stated
[01:23:53.540 --> 01:24:03.260]  that one of my issue was the Florida commercial the Florida suspended
[01:24:03.260 --> 01:24:09.580]  commercial driver's license statute was infringing on my personal right on my
[01:24:09.580 --> 01:24:15.260]  personal security and the way he wrote it he made it he made it known that this
[01:24:15.260 --> 01:24:22.740]  is an issue but because I asked for the injunction right they cannot move
[01:24:22.740 --> 01:24:29.340]  forward because the state was the one or the state is a proper avenue for the
[01:24:29.340 --> 01:24:35.700]  injunction. Right, so you have to use a state course to block the agency's
[01:24:35.700 --> 01:24:43.540]  enforcement of a law that violates your rights. Right, so and in that sense like
[01:24:43.540 --> 01:24:48.060]  all the arguments that people are making and you got a problem with the public
[01:24:48.060 --> 01:24:53.340]  officials and all this other stuff if they really use but look at the
[01:24:53.340 --> 01:24:59.820]  declares for a judgment they can find a way because there's it says that any
[01:24:59.820 --> 01:25:06.220]  contract of you should read the statute it shows that there's any contract or
[01:25:06.220 --> 01:25:12.820]  anything that's disputable or a right that is need to be clarified can be
[01:25:12.820 --> 01:25:20.380]  brought up in that suit and once it's clarified it is binding it's lost. Right,
[01:25:20.380 --> 01:25:28.380]  so I'm wondering like if we understood if like that's the key if we understood to
[01:25:28.380 --> 01:25:35.420]  beating them up or getting something changed or a difference instead
[01:25:35.420 --> 01:25:41.420]  of just arguing and bringing up an issue if we sat down and thought about it
[01:25:41.420 --> 01:25:48.220]  clearly and then went through the declaratory judgment to our act of the
[01:25:48.220 --> 01:25:54.660]  state and then pulled out the pulled out the questions and the right and you
[01:25:54.660 --> 01:25:59.580]  know what is not being followed and put it before the courts properly I don't
[01:25:59.580 --> 01:26:06.380]  think they have a they have no way out it just that we as people are not educated
[01:26:06.380 --> 01:26:12.620]  on the process and what it entails or what that would be correct you would be
[01:26:12.620 --> 01:26:20.420]  absolutely right so we that's that's what I keep telling people they're
[01:26:20.420 --> 01:26:25.020]  looking for these silver bullet fixes to the problem there isn't one there is a
[01:26:25.020 --> 01:26:30.780]  fix but the fix requires you to actually know and understand something not just
[01:26:30.780 --> 01:26:36.340]  make crap up out of thin air and that's one of the reasons why I'm so glad
[01:26:36.340 --> 01:26:41.540]  you're out there you are proof positive that the information we provide not
[01:26:41.540 --> 01:26:51.020]  only works but that people can use it to do everything that you've done because
[01:26:51.020 --> 01:26:56.500]  without a doubt you have accomplished more than any other single person I know
[01:26:56.500 --> 01:27:00.660]  in fighting back against this crap in your states the two you've been in to
[01:27:00.660 --> 01:27:11.300]  handle these issues and I mean tell tell me right or wrong did we provide the
[01:27:11.300 --> 01:27:17.620]  information necessary for you to get that far right and did we help you by
[01:27:17.620 --> 01:27:24.020]  answering questions and did we answer them correctly yeah
[01:27:24.860 --> 01:27:29.020]  yeah and that means you've been in the fight this whole time still going right
[01:27:29.020 --> 01:27:38.620]  yeah there you go people what more do you want out there we do our best to
[01:27:38.620 --> 01:27:43.340]  help everybody we can but so many people just don't want to listen or don't want
[01:27:43.340 --> 01:27:47.340]  to take it upon themselves to be responsible people for their own
[01:27:47.340 --> 01:27:53.820]  actions in their own welfare why is that what can you tell me because I can't
[01:27:53.820 --> 01:27:59.580]  figure it out well what I've noticed going through this whole process is that
[01:27:59.580 --> 01:28:11.540]  the IQ level of a normal individual is not going to allow them to complete the
[01:28:11.540 --> 01:28:16.980]  task at hand they've made the legal justice system so convoluted and
[01:28:16.980 --> 01:28:23.300]  complex that someone who's trying to take care of the family you pay to build
[01:28:23.300 --> 01:28:28.500]  you know get things together and live or not like it doesn't have time to do
[01:28:28.500 --> 01:28:34.620]  that they're halfway fried before they get down to reading rules to some court
[01:28:34.620 --> 01:28:39.020]  you know the procedures are getting in the way like these are
[01:28:39.020 --> 01:28:44.100]  statistical things that we're not realizing be prepared for because our
[01:28:44.100 --> 01:28:49.060]  parents is not teachers by hate they're going to try to take over our court
[01:28:49.060 --> 01:28:54.020]  systems these little rules no one that wasn't expressed so we were there's a
[01:28:54.020 --> 01:29:02.340]  big gap in between that hey we're in a war and where we're actually free yeah
[01:29:02.340 --> 01:29:06.500]  and the thing is is when people don't want to take the responsibility to try
[01:29:06.500 --> 01:29:12.340]  to change that about themselves how do you help them at that point they're the
[01:29:12.340 --> 01:29:15.860]  ones that fall back and just start complaining about how corrupt and bad
[01:29:15.860 --> 01:29:18.900]  the system is but they don't see that they're the reason it gets to stay that
[01:29:18.900 --> 01:29:24.060]  way hang on man let me take this other break it won't be right back
[01:29:26.900 --> 01:29:32.140]  through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the
[01:29:32.140 --> 01:29:36.540]  area of nutrition people feed their pets better than they feed themselves and
[01:29:36.540 --> 01:29:41.540]  it's time we changed all that our primary defense against aging and disease in
[01:29:41.540 --> 01:29:46.540]  this toxic environment is good nutrition in a world where natural foods have been
[01:29:46.540 --> 01:29:51.780]  irradiated adulterated and mutilated young Jevity can provide the nutrients
[01:29:51.780 --> 01:29:56.260]  you need logos radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of
[01:29:56.260 --> 01:30:02.020]  products most of which we reject we have come to trust Jevity so much we became
[01:30:02.020 --> 01:30:07.420]  a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones Ben Fuchs and many others when you
[01:30:07.420 --> 01:30:13.180]  order from logos radio network calm your health will improve as you help support
[01:30:13.180 --> 01:30:18.020]  quality radio as you realize the benefits of young Jevity you may want to
[01:30:18.020 --> 01:30:22.780]  join us as a distributor you can experience improved health help your
[01:30:22.780 --> 01:30:29.180]  friends and family and increase your income order now are you the plaintiff
[01:30:29.180 --> 01:30:33.700]  or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[01:30:33.700 --> 01:30:40.140]  the affordable easy to understand for CD course that will show you how in 24
[01:30:40.140 --> 01:30:46.420]  hours step-by-step you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if
[01:30:46.420 --> 01:30:50.900]  you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have
[01:30:50.900 --> 01:30:54.860]  one with our step-by-step course and now you can too
[01:30:54.860 --> 01:31:00.060]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[01:31:00.060 --> 01:31:04.780]  experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone
[01:31:04.780 --> 01:31:09.540]  should understand about the principles and practices that control our American
[01:31:09.540 --> 01:31:15.620]  courts you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for
[01:31:15.620 --> 01:31:21.900]  civil cases pro se tactics and much more please visit rule of law radio calm
[01:31:21.900 --> 01:31:29.300]  and click on the banner are called toll-free 866 law easy
[01:31:29.300 --> 01:31:39.700]  on the day I was born on the floor got around the gates and wide wonder at the
[01:31:39.700 --> 01:31:46.260]  joy they have found the nurse folk up to leave this world
[01:31:46.260 --> 01:31:52.460]  you can tell right away all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio we
[01:31:52.460 --> 01:31:56.260]  are now in the final segment of tonight's show and we are still talking with
[01:31:56.260 --> 01:32:01.460]  Olivier and well let's say you're in Florida now aren't you Olivier yes sir
[01:32:01.460 --> 01:32:05.140]  all right so we'll have to get that updated because you still shows you
[01:32:05.140 --> 01:32:13.060]  Tennessee on the callboard but we'll get that updated all right so for what
[01:32:13.060 --> 01:32:18.220]  you've been working on you're going against you said the driver's license
[01:32:18.220 --> 01:32:24.420]  statute and what else they'll they put that they have with this thing called
[01:32:24.420 --> 01:32:28.740]  failure to maintain lane with right and that's the essence they'll just charge
[01:32:28.740 --> 01:32:35.220]  anyone with that just to give them a reason to stop you pull you over right
[01:32:35.220 --> 01:32:42.060]  what you don't what it doesn't show is all the requirements and the proper
[01:32:42.060 --> 01:32:49.860]  statutory regulations that it needs to be constitutional so another part of the
[01:32:49.860 --> 01:32:56.180]  puzzle that I wanted to tell everyone about the dept. or judgment
[01:32:56.180 --> 01:33:02.660]  dept. or judgment is the vehicle to get into the course but the secret that I
[01:33:02.660 --> 01:33:08.860]  found is the voice of vagueness there's a voice of vagueness concept where the
[01:33:08.860 --> 01:33:16.620]  legislature or we never have it whoever's right in this ordinance has a duty to
[01:33:16.620 --> 01:33:22.220]  write it constitutionally and what you understand of voice of vagueness there's
[01:33:22.220 --> 01:33:29.780]  a whole bunch of things that can find it voice of vagueness language over
[01:33:29.780 --> 01:33:36.620]  broadest like the range of authority that they're given to the officials is
[01:33:36.620 --> 01:33:44.140]  over broad it covers constitutional protected right so if it doesn't have
[01:33:44.140 --> 01:33:54.580]  language in the statute to explain to the people who are authorized to manage
[01:33:54.580 --> 01:34:00.140]  that statute what is illegal and what is not who has rights and who don't it's
[01:34:00.140 --> 01:34:07.620]  automatically voice of vagueness but there's plenty of reasons to find a
[01:34:07.620 --> 01:34:13.180]  statute voice of vagueness yeah the courts avoid them like the plague if it
[01:34:13.180 --> 01:34:17.500]  all possible keep that in mind a court will always try to find a way to read a
[01:34:17.500 --> 01:34:23.620]  statute that prevents them from having to avoid it always keep that in mind
[01:34:23.620 --> 01:34:28.980]  right so be prepared for any argument they would make to say why it should not
[01:34:28.980 --> 01:34:33.940]  be avoided because it will happen and I understand the point you're making about
[01:34:33.940 --> 01:34:38.260]  that because that's exactly the problem with the driver's licensing statute here
[01:34:38.260 --> 01:34:43.900]  in Texas the original statutes only contain three forms of actual licenses
[01:34:43.900 --> 01:34:48.460]  operators commercial operators and show first those three forms of licenses no
[01:34:48.460 --> 01:34:53.140]  longer exist in the current code and that wasn't because the code was amended
[01:34:53.140 --> 01:34:58.340]  to make them something else they just completely left them out entirely when
[01:34:58.340 --> 01:35:04.900]  they rewrote the code what they did was then substitute the temporary names that
[01:35:04.900 --> 01:35:11.660]  were used for those license in the original law as the new licenses there
[01:35:11.660 --> 01:35:16.420]  is no longer an operators and show first and a commercial operators there's now
[01:35:16.420 --> 01:35:20.980]  just a driver's license that only references license issued in their
[01:35:20.980 --> 01:35:29.860]  temporary form as they used to exist and every license is currently in Texas law
[01:35:29.860 --> 01:35:35.780]  it's illegal for someone to apply for if you look at what the paperwork says
[01:35:35.780 --> 01:35:43.420]  applying for a Texas driver's license by not being some specific legal type of
[01:35:43.420 --> 01:35:49.900]  individual is a crime and the law makes it very clear they can throw you in jail
[01:35:49.900 --> 01:35:54.380]  for that crime and then they tell you you have to go commit it by filling out the
[01:35:54.380 --> 01:35:59.780]  application and getting a license that doesn't exist there's a problem here
[01:35:59.780 --> 01:36:05.180]  you see right yeah right but if you write it in the correct language just
[01:36:05.180 --> 01:36:09.060]  just in the fact that though the thing that I realized going through all these
[01:36:09.060 --> 01:36:16.820]  cases I realized you are saying right to travel and all these other things but
[01:36:16.820 --> 01:36:23.460]  it's actually the right to use the right to use a automobile on the on the public
[01:36:23.460 --> 01:36:29.740]  roads and highway yeah it's a it's a right to personal locomotion for private
[01:36:29.740 --> 01:36:33.780]  business and pleasure is how the original court case decided but you're
[01:36:33.780 --> 01:36:38.220]  right it could be almost anything else but it's never been a right to travel
[01:36:38.220 --> 01:36:42.620]  issue I've said that God knows how many times on this show correct and then that
[01:36:42.620 --> 01:36:48.380]  that's another thing that I've noticed that we have there's a whole bunch of
[01:36:48.380 --> 01:36:54.100]  rights that are not written down that none of our rights are written down
[01:36:54.100 --> 01:36:58.740]  that's that's the that's the amazing thing here okay the Constitution is not
[01:36:58.740 --> 01:37:03.500]  the source of our rights and just because it enumerated some it did not
[01:37:03.500 --> 01:37:12.340]  invalidate others that existed whether it enumerated the others or not right so
[01:37:12.340 --> 01:37:16.860]  it went when I when I realized that and I added it to the equation and I
[01:37:16.860 --> 01:37:22.700]  realized like this is very dangerous now that I know that our rights are not just
[01:37:22.700 --> 01:37:26.460]  written down there they are right if you feel like there's something that you
[01:37:26.460 --> 01:37:31.500]  you could do you're supposed to be able to do that's not harming someone else you
[01:37:31.500 --> 01:37:38.220]  have the you have the right to have that legally contested against any statute
[01:37:38.220 --> 01:37:44.820]  municipal code anything yeah absolutely I mean it astounds me when these idiot
[01:37:44.820 --> 01:37:48.340]  attorneys say well the Constitution doesn't say you have that right no slash
[01:37:48.340 --> 01:37:53.460]  dude the Constitution is not the source of my rights it doesn't speak to what my
[01:37:53.460 --> 01:37:58.380]  rights are it speaks to what rights of mine you are not allowed to interfere
[01:37:58.380 --> 01:38:03.500]  with in any way shape or form and it does not by enumerating those specific
[01:38:03.500 --> 01:38:10.580]  ones authorize you to violate any of the ones that aren't listed right no one
[01:38:10.580 --> 01:38:14.140]  says that to the stupid attorneys or judges that comes back with that report
[01:38:14.140 --> 01:38:21.220]  nobody then they should but you know what through listening to your shows I
[01:38:21.220 --> 01:38:28.340]  learned to bypass all that because I realized that if I'm being deceived with
[01:38:28.340 --> 01:38:32.460]  the education that I'm given then I realized that the education that they
[01:38:32.460 --> 01:38:36.100]  were given they only can see things in a certain way if they don't already know
[01:38:36.100 --> 01:38:43.100]  that they're doing something wrong so I use that to bypass it and focus on
[01:38:43.100 --> 01:38:49.100]  exactly what I'm trying to address and and deal with the courts because I
[01:38:49.100 --> 01:38:54.980]  realized what they say and how you feel doesn't matter
[01:38:55.340 --> 01:39:02.420]  yeah exactly so that's the other thing feelings aren't going to get you anywhere
[01:39:02.420 --> 01:39:07.820]  you've got to be able to support your position in other ways right so I really
[01:39:07.820 --> 01:39:11.900]  thank y'all and I know every time I speak to someone and I you know express
[01:39:11.900 --> 01:39:17.900]  myself they tell me that you said I'm out this world and it couldn't I couldn't
[01:39:17.900 --> 01:39:22.140]  done it without listening to your shows and going to jail a couple times
[01:39:22.140 --> 01:39:28.580]  learning the hard way but I need so I can you know extremely later pathway for
[01:39:28.580 --> 01:39:33.860]  everyone else now well good I'm sorry as always that anyone has to suffer through
[01:39:33.860 --> 01:39:38.260]  that to get their point made but sometimes learning experiences are not
[01:39:38.260 --> 01:39:45.100]  easy experiences right and yeah so and now I know that you know there's a gap
[01:39:45.100 --> 01:39:50.500]  and I need to reach down to the younger generation and passes on like hey it is
[01:39:50.500 --> 01:39:57.500]  our responsibility to keep them in line our our forefathers did not do that
[01:39:57.500 --> 01:40:02.500]  because they did not educate themselves enough they did not put their cells in
[01:40:02.500 --> 01:40:08.660]  action enough and in the problem manner to you know stop we have all the two
[01:40:08.660 --> 01:40:14.500]  that we need to stop them we just not doing I just realized it's like wow yeah
[01:40:14.500 --> 01:40:19.540]  you're right and there they're in lies the problem we aren't doing enough for
[01:40:19.540 --> 01:40:21.980]  ourselves
[01:40:21.980 --> 01:40:28.060]  so I'm going as soon as I get this written up and everything I guess I'm
[01:40:28.060 --> 01:40:34.620]  just copy of it so all right if anybody else wants to look at it and get
[01:40:34.620 --> 01:40:39.580]  together figure out what they need to do because you can tag all the issues that
[01:40:39.580 --> 01:40:44.740]  you people complain about you just have to reach to figure it in your head alright
[01:40:44.740 --> 01:40:50.460]  or duty or whatever that's you you're the one in control it's like well I tell
[01:40:50.460 --> 01:40:55.340]  you what I'll do Olivier if you'll write up some sort of small description of
[01:40:55.340 --> 01:40:59.300]  what what it is this document is supposed to be accomplishing and why and
[01:40:59.300 --> 01:41:03.180]  send me that description and a copy of that document I'll put it up on the
[01:41:03.180 --> 01:41:12.740]  legal blog in an article okay all right and that way it's available to as many
[01:41:12.740 --> 01:41:16.580]  people as want to go see it and you can just send them to Tower of Law and I'll
[01:41:16.580 --> 01:41:19.820]  send you an email back telling you exactly what the name and the link to the
[01:41:19.820 --> 01:41:23.740]  article is so they can pull it up you can email to whoever you want or you can
[01:41:23.740 --> 01:41:27.460]  tell them to go look here for an article with this title and you'll find it in
[01:41:27.460 --> 01:41:33.980]  everything the documents there that work okay yeah all right
[01:41:33.980 --> 01:41:40.700]  okay no problem man appreciate you you take good care and you stay fighting
[01:41:40.700 --> 01:41:46.460]  don't let them get the best of you all right well all right take care man but
[01:41:46.460 --> 01:41:52.860]  like all right I got about two minutes John can you get your question asked in
[01:41:52.860 --> 01:41:59.260]  two minutes I certainly can thank you very kindly okay good shot you sue can
[01:41:59.260 --> 01:42:04.780]  you help me sue a robo-caller who's constantly calling me three four and five
[01:42:04.780 --> 01:42:10.700]  times a day to sell me some insurance policy on my household appliances or my
[01:42:10.700 --> 01:42:16.020]  car and they here's the problem with the robo-caller have you tracked down the
[01:42:16.020 --> 01:42:21.820]  robo-caller yes oh and they they they exist it's I guess it's a legal entity
[01:42:21.820 --> 01:42:26.020]  it really is a company and they they robo-call all the time and I got a record
[01:42:26.020 --> 01:42:30.340]  of it on my phone they call it sometimes two three and four times a day maybe five
[01:42:30.340 --> 01:42:36.100]  okay are you going to go after them under federal or state law hmm which would
[01:42:36.100 --> 01:42:40.220]  you suggest I mean well that depends did you put yourself on the national do not
[01:42:40.220 --> 01:42:45.220]  call list yes I did then you would do it under federal law because it's a
[01:42:45.220 --> 01:42:52.020]  national list your state wouldn't be able to cover a national list right okay
[01:42:52.020 --> 01:42:57.700]  now okay so you need to read and learn the federal telephony act which goes
[01:42:57.700 --> 01:43:02.540]  with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as well okay now Fair Debt
[01:43:02.540 --> 01:43:07.140]  Collection Practices Act I'm I'm trained in I used to be a debt collector
[01:43:07.140 --> 01:43:14.180]  so okay but the telephony act can go hand in hand with that if these callers are
[01:43:14.180 --> 01:43:19.380]  hitting you up for debt collection on the phone the same thing would apply if
[01:43:19.380 --> 01:43:26.900]  they're using it for do not calls okay so federal telephones yeah look look at
[01:43:26.900 --> 01:43:31.340]  the federal do not call registry and see what laws it specifically says
[01:43:31.340 --> 01:43:36.140]  governs people who violate the do not call registry then you'll know what laws
[01:43:36.140 --> 01:43:41.060]  you need to become proficient in but I'm pretty sure it's going to refer you
[01:43:41.060 --> 01:43:48.380]  back to the telephony okay okay all right thank you very much you're welcome
[01:43:48.380 --> 01:43:52.020]  you take care man all right folks that has been the Monday night rule of law
[01:43:52.020 --> 01:43:55.820]  radio show with your host Eddie Craig I hope everybody had a good time listen
[01:43:55.820 --> 01:44:00.780]  tonight and y'all take care and please keep up the financial support for the
[01:44:00.780 --> 01:44:04.860]  network and the donations they're what keeps us going and what helps us live to
[01:44:04.860 --> 01:44:09.900]  bring this information to you without you we can't be here so everybody take
[01:44:09.900 --> 01:44:15.140]  care have a good night God bless and have a great week
[01:44:16.580 --> 01:44:22.460]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called
[01:44:22.460 --> 01:44:26.980]  the New Testament recovery version the New Testament recovery version has over
[01:44:26.980 --> 01:44:32.460]  9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse helping you to
[01:44:32.460 --> 01:44:37.340]  know God and to know the meaning of life order your free copy today from Bibles
[01:44:37.340 --> 01:44:46.820]  for America call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:44:46.820 --> 01:44:52.220]  this translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross
[01:44:52.220 --> 01:44:57.380]  references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible this
[01:44:57.380 --> 01:45:01.980]  is truly a Bible you can understand to get your free copy of the New Testament
[01:45:01.980 --> 01:45:12.780]  recovery version call us toll free at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit
[01:45:12.780 --> 01:45:32.140]  us online at bfa.org looking for some truth you found it logosradionetwork.com