ROL_2021-05-07_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.720]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.720 --> 00:13.040]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.040 --> 00:21.320]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.320 --> 00:29.960]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, etherean $200.00
[00:29.960 --> 00:41.280]  $27.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.280 --> 00:52.280]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.280 --> 00:58.200]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and
[00:58.200 --> 01:07.320]  entering 40.00 today in history. In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill
[01:07.320 --> 01:13.040]  1325 legalizing HEPA to tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including
[01:13.040 --> 01:17.760]  Houston, Austin and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing
[01:17.760 --> 01:22.240]  to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:22.240 --> 01:27.120]  equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney
[01:27.120 --> 01:31.120]  announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery
[01:31.120 --> 01:35.800]  of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including
[01:35.800 --> 01:39.800]  the Attorney General stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday
[01:39.800 --> 01:44.400]  that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate
[01:44.400 --> 01:50.320]  a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works. As well as other cities too, like the district
[01:50.320 --> 01:56.520]  attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the
[01:56.520 --> 02:01.800]  law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.800 --> 02:06.720]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.720 --> 02:10.720]  in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.720 --> 02:15.000]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged
[02:15.000 --> 02:18.800]  with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[02:18.800 --> 02:27.200]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[02:27.200 --> 02:32.320]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.320 --> 02:37.960]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:37.960 --> 02:42.600]  Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid
[02:42.600 --> 02:49.600]  from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn
[02:49.600 --> 03:16.600]  into the glow.
[03:16.600 --> 03:45.600]  Okay, we are back.
[03:45.600 --> 03:54.880]  Randy Calhoun, Brett Fountain, Rulvo Radio on this Friday, the seventh day of May, 2021,
[03:54.880 --> 04:03.400]  and we're talking to Scott in Michigan. Okay, we're talking about oaths. If the judge didn't
[04:03.400 --> 04:12.440]  have a proper oath, then he did not have subject matter jurisdiction to render any rulings.
[04:12.440 --> 04:27.480]  So what about all of these cases that the judge has heard and there were lawyers representing
[04:27.480 --> 04:33.560]  the client and the lawyers representing the client didn't challenge the subject matter
[04:33.560 --> 04:42.320]  jurisdiction of the court? They knew or should have known that the judge lacks subject matter
[04:42.320 --> 04:52.360]  jurisdiction and they didn't file that in their client's behalf. Oh, that'll make a
[04:52.360 --> 04:59.560]  lot of happy if you start bar-grieving those lawyers. I just bar-grieved 35.
[04:59.560 --> 05:07.840]  Okay, because they didn't do their due diligence, right? Exactly. They didn't properly adjudicate
[05:07.840 --> 05:12.680]  their client's case. Their client had the case to dismissal for lack of subject matter
[05:12.680 --> 05:18.560]  jurisdiction and the lawyer didn't address it. That's egregious malpractice.
[05:18.560 --> 05:34.080]  These lawyers say it again. That's an omission of the greatest sort, right? Exactly. These
[05:34.080 --> 05:44.520]  lawyers, if they're working for a law firm, some of these city attorneys will be working
[05:44.520 --> 05:50.720]  at the city as an attorney, but then they also work at a law firm and all of their bosses
[05:50.720 --> 05:58.920]  and the partners of the law firm also get to share in that guilt, pass it around, let
[05:58.920 --> 06:07.760]  everybody get some of those bar grievances. In terms of the argument that the oath don't
[06:07.760 --> 06:14.760]  expire, the first thing that comes to mind there is the informal logical fallacy of
[06:14.760 --> 06:21.080]  composition. Anytime you start messing with the relationship of parts to whole in a situation
[06:21.080 --> 06:28.200]  like that, that's something that definitely I want to look into some more, but to say
[06:28.200 --> 06:34.760]  that it isn't a whole package deal whether or not the judge was properly sitting as a
[06:34.760 --> 06:39.440]  lawyer, to say that you can take little bits and pieces out of there and look the other
[06:39.440 --> 06:44.040]  way, I think there'd be plenty of room to challenge that.
[06:44.040 --> 06:54.840]  Yeah, I would think so. The main thing about it is I like to go after them not for really
[06:54.840 --> 07:07.880]  horrible egregious things, but technical issues because I want them to follow the law technically.
[07:07.880 --> 07:15.680]  We got Walker V. Packer here in Texas and it says, a judge has no discretion in properly
[07:15.680 --> 07:23.440]  applying the law to the facts. A failure to do so is a breach of discretion. I'm sorry,
[07:23.440 --> 07:31.760]  a failure to do so is an abuse of discretion. Under Texas law and most every other law,
[07:31.760 --> 07:37.680]  an abuse of discretion on the part of a public official is an act of official misconduct
[07:37.680 --> 07:44.080]  or in Texas it would be more specifically official oppression, which is a classic mystery.
[07:44.080 --> 07:53.320]  I've got a lot of background noise there, Scott. Okay, it would be official oppression.
[07:53.320 --> 08:02.920]  That's a crime in the state of Texas, classic misdemeanor. We have the judge in Wise County
[08:02.920 --> 08:13.160]  who, which one did I want to address? I just filed criminal charges against him because
[08:13.160 --> 08:20.800]  he requested an opinion from the Attorney General on an open records request, but that
[08:20.800 --> 08:26.680]  wasn't the one I wanted to go to. I was helping someone else with a case and the judge rendered
[08:26.680 --> 08:38.360]  a ruling and we asked for findings of fact and conclusions at law. Rule 297 says that
[08:38.360 --> 08:47.400]  the judge shall produce findings of fact and conclusions at law within 20 days. It does
[08:47.400 --> 08:56.600]  not say May, May, or 10 if he wants to. It says shall. If you don't request findings
[08:56.600 --> 09:04.240]  of fact and conclusions at law under Texas law, you waive any errors. So this was critical
[09:04.240 --> 09:09.920]  to the right to appeal. And he didn't produce it within 20 days. Well, the law says, and
[09:09.920 --> 09:14.760]  the rule says that if he doesn't produce it in 20 days, you can file a notice of late
[09:14.760 --> 09:22.400]  filing and he has 10 more days. Well, on the 21st day we filed a notice of late filing
[09:22.400 --> 09:27.600]  and we filed criminal charges with the grand jury for official misconduct, I'm sorry, official
[09:27.600 --> 09:34.600]  oppression. In that he failed to perform a duty he was required to perform and in the
[09:34.600 --> 09:39.200]  process denied a citizen the full free access to her enjoyment right. He denied the citizen
[09:39.200 --> 09:48.120]  in his right to appeal a ruling that was an act of official misconduct on its face and
[09:48.120 --> 09:54.000]  abusive discretion. Now, judges say if you don't like my ruling, you can go to the Court
[09:54.000 --> 10:00.960]  of Appeals. Yeah, we can. We can also appeal your ruling to a grand jury of our peers and
[10:00.960 --> 10:05.560]  see what they think about it. If you go to the Court of Appeals, you're appealing to
[10:05.560 --> 10:12.640]  that judge's peers. I would rather appeal to a grand jury. And that's what I was just
[10:12.640 --> 10:21.320]  in Johnson County for was to appeal to the grand jury to see what they thought. Okay.
[10:21.320 --> 10:32.280]  Have you looked at the codes in Michigan to see what the duties of grand jurors are and
[10:32.280 --> 10:40.800]  if there is any restriction on a private citizen from giving notice of crime to a grand jury?
[10:40.800 --> 10:51.920]  Well, I consider Michigan to be a bit of a backwood state because we do not have grand juries.
[10:51.920 --> 11:01.880]  What do they have in its place? Let me explain why I asked that question that way. In Pennsylvania,
[11:01.880 --> 11:08.160]  they have grand juries but only the prosecutor or the district judge can convene a grand jury
[11:08.160 --> 11:16.000]  and only they can present to them. But as an offset, unlike most of the Spanish law states,
[11:16.000 --> 11:23.880]  most everything west of the 13 colonies, where you have a duty to report crime but
[11:23.880 --> 11:28.720]  you have no standing in the prosecution of the crime. In Pennsylvania, where you don't
[11:28.720 --> 11:35.280]  have a grand jury, you report crime to the prosecutor and he gets first blush. If he
[11:35.280 --> 11:41.280]  decides not to prosecute, you have standing. You can appeal his decision to the Court of
[11:41.280 --> 11:47.440]  Common Pleas and then through the district court all the way up to the Supreme. Do they
[11:47.440 --> 11:57.400]  have anything in Michigan that gives a citizen the power to force the system to enforce law?
[11:57.400 --> 12:02.280]  Is the Court of Common Pleas just one single location?
[12:02.280 --> 12:15.600]  No, no, it's like a county court. In Pennsylvania, they got interesting names. It's like a J.P.
[12:15.600 --> 12:25.520]  Court of Common Pleas. The county clerk in Pennsylvania is called the Prothonotary. Cool
[12:25.520 --> 12:34.080]  names. Just adding to the ambiguity so you can't get anything done, right? No, it's
[12:34.080 --> 12:43.760]  actually, we had a guy appeal a traffic ticket all the way up to the Pennsylvania Supreme
[12:43.760 --> 12:54.480]  and they wrote him a 20 page judgment on a traffic ticket appeal. It was a beautiful
[12:54.480 --> 13:04.040]  piece of work. They obviously spent a lot of time on that. I was impressed with Pennsylvania.
[13:04.040 --> 13:11.440]  But every state has a good side, has a bad side. Almost all of the laws of all the states
[13:11.440 --> 13:18.240]  are just almost all the same. There are just some tiny variations. In Michigan, if you
[13:18.240 --> 13:24.920]  don't have a grand jury, you have to have something that gives the people the ability
[13:24.920 --> 13:30.120]  to ensure that they're public officials in force law.
[13:30.120 --> 13:37.680]  The only entity that I can identify that might be that is something called the Recorder's
[13:37.680 --> 13:45.920]  Court for the City of Detroit. That appears to be the only entity in the state that kind
[13:45.920 --> 13:54.560]  of operates on old fashioned pre-statute kind of principles or if you want to call it common
[13:54.560 --> 14:03.160]  law. That Recorder's Court seems to be the only thing that might be taking the place
[14:03.160 --> 14:08.440]  of the grand jury. I think they could be, you could go to the Recorder's Court with
[14:08.440 --> 14:16.400]  a complaint and I think they might have the power to convoke a grand jury.
[14:16.400 --> 14:29.840]  Okay. What about magistrates? How are complaints filed in Michigan? Let me ask that differently.
[14:29.840 --> 14:36.840]  What does the statute say about how complaints are to be filed in Michigan?
[14:36.840 --> 14:44.520]  The decision to charge is the prosecutor's. Is that what it says in the code?
[14:44.520 --> 14:51.480]  I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty... The reason I asked that question is if you
[14:51.480 --> 14:58.600]  go to Texas and file a criminal complaint, they will tell you that the complaint goes
[14:58.600 --> 15:04.600]  to the prosecutor and the prosecutor decides whether to push the prosecutor or not. That's
[15:04.600 --> 15:13.080]  what they do, but that's not what the law says. The law says that if a peace officer
[15:13.080 --> 15:20.800]  hasn't made known to him that a crime has been committed, he is to present a complaint
[15:20.800 --> 15:30.320]  to some magistrate. And when a magistrate is presented with a criminal complaint, that
[15:30.320 --> 15:39.160]  invokes the judge's duty under Article 2.10. It is the duty of all magistrates keep the
[15:39.160 --> 15:48.480]  peace in the state. All magistrates, when a judge or a JP or a municipal court judge
[15:48.480 --> 15:54.320]  is sitting in the capacity of a magistrate, he is now a statewide official.
[15:54.320 --> 16:02.240]  Attorney General, Op. 500, it's a legal brief by the Attorney General says any magistrate
[16:02.240 --> 16:10.880]  may hear any complaint state or federal felony or misdemeanor. When the magistrate, when
[16:10.880 --> 16:18.720]  the judge sits as a magistrate, he now has statewide jurisdiction for the singular purpose
[16:18.720 --> 16:26.680]  of examining into the sufficiency of a criminal accusation under 2.11. When a judge sits for
[16:26.680 --> 16:34.200]  the purpose of examining into a criminal accusation, that is an examining court. An examining court
[16:34.200 --> 16:44.880]  is held under Chapter 16 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. And we're about to
[16:44.880 --> 16:51.680]  run off the cliff. Oh, almost run off the cliff. Deborah will skin me alive if I run
[16:51.680 --> 17:00.160]  off the cliff. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, move on radio, we'll be right back.
[17:00.160 --> 17:05.440]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[17:05.440 --> 17:09.680]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. Michael Mearris has
[17:09.680 --> 17:14.600]  won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll
[17:14.600 --> 17:19.480]  get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[17:19.480 --> 17:24.600]  rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? How to
[17:24.600 --> 17:29.080]  answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[17:29.080 --> 17:34.120]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael
[17:34.120 --> 17:39.560]  Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation
[17:39.560 --> 17:44.640]  is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click
[17:44.640 --> 17:51.680]  on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com
[17:51.680 --> 17:59.880]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[17:59.880 --> 18:05.560]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America
[18:05.560 --> 18:08.920]  we live in a us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free
[18:08.920 --> 18:13.000]  society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights
[18:13.000 --> 18:16.240]  are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private
[18:16.240 --> 18:20.200]  capacity and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford
[18:20.200 --> 18:24.080]  us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through
[18:24.080 --> 18:28.040]  due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[18:28.040 --> 18:31.760]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand
[18:31.760 --> 18:35.760]  what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy
[18:35.760 --> 18:40.640]  of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering
[18:40.640 --> 18:44.240]  now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus
[18:44.240 --> 18:48.520]  the Lie, a video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents
[18:48.520 --> 18:51.800]  and further useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help
[18:51.800 --> 18:56.280]  of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have
[18:56.280 --> 19:24.280]  a free society we all want and deserve.
[19:24.280 --> 19:54.240]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio and we're talking to Scott
[19:54.240 --> 20:01.040]  and Michigan and Scott, I know we're getting kind of detailed here, but this is where the
[20:01.040 --> 20:07.880]  fun is. This is where the power is. If we're going to take our system back, this is where
[20:07.880 --> 20:15.640]  we'll do it is in the fine details. We start taking these guys apart on fine details they're
[20:15.640 --> 20:22.000]  missing. That's going to make them crazy and it will keep them from doing the more serious
[20:22.000 --> 20:31.160]  issues. How do we get to them, Scott? How do we get past a prosecuting attorney who wants
[20:31.160 --> 20:37.320]  to act as a gatekeeper because they never want to prosecute public officials, especially
[20:37.320 --> 20:47.360]  police because the police are part of the prosecutorial team. To have a prosecutor make
[20:47.360 --> 20:55.960]  a determination as to whether or not to prosecute a police officer who is acting under the direction
[20:55.960 --> 20:58.560]  of the prosecutor is insane.
[20:58.560 --> 21:03.480]  That has to be...
[21:03.480 --> 21:05.160]  It's corrupt here.
[21:05.160 --> 21:08.920]  Okay, say that again. I interrupt it. Go ahead.
[21:08.920 --> 21:15.520]  To me, that is why the system that we have here in Michigan, smacks of corruption. I
[21:15.520 --> 21:23.120]  mean, the idea that we don't have grand juries and that the judicial corruption here in Michigan
[21:23.120 --> 21:28.160]  is one of the highest in the nation, I think those two statistics go hand in hand.
[21:28.160 --> 21:40.320]  I think you may be right. Look at your law closely. We have 200 years of lawmaking, actually
[21:40.320 --> 21:47.840]  we have 800. The American legal system was adopted from the British and there's go back
[21:47.840 --> 21:59.080]  to 1215 AD. Every state I've looked at has a very sophisticated body of law and it has
[21:59.080 --> 22:11.720]  checks and balances. The laws were created by politicians. Politicians are corrupt and
[22:11.720 --> 22:18.360]  the problem with all the politicians being corrupt is they have to be able to protect
[22:18.360 --> 22:25.880]  themselves from each other. They didn't put these checks and balances in there for us.
[22:25.880 --> 22:31.800]  They put these checks and balances in there for themselves, but luckily we get to use
[22:31.800 --> 22:39.280]  them. In Michigan, if you have a lot of corrupt officials, the officials themselves have to
[22:39.280 --> 22:46.800]  have some way of protecting themselves from the other sharks in their pool, just a matter
[22:46.800 --> 22:49.000]  of finding it.
[22:49.000 --> 22:56.800]  Well, on that point, I think it's really interesting. Is it just me or have you noticed that it
[22:56.800 --> 23:05.000]  seems that any kind of statutes or laws that speak to treason by public officials are being
[23:05.000 --> 23:11.720]  tacitly buried by those same public officials so that accountability system won't exist?
[23:11.720 --> 23:19.240]  That is the nature of the beast. That's why I say the problem with the system are not
[23:19.240 --> 23:26.960]  these corrupt public officials. Corrupt public officials in government have been endemic
[23:26.960 --> 23:35.880]  to all governments since we've had government. Nature of the animal. We are in a republic
[23:35.880 --> 23:44.160]  and that republic was designed to put a check and balance to the abuse of power and the
[23:44.160 --> 23:52.680]  check they put in place were the citizens. We have the power to check abuse.
[23:52.680 --> 24:10.680]  So if you're unable to get the state of Michigan to enforce its own laws, then that's a constitutional
[24:10.680 --> 24:19.920]  denial of due process. If you file a complaint and the state refuses to prosecute, then file
[24:19.920 --> 24:29.440]  against the prosecutor with the feds accusing him of denying you in your right to the due
[24:29.440 --> 24:32.440]  course of the laws.
[24:32.440 --> 24:39.040]  That is the only way that I could access a grand jury here in Michigan is to go federally,
[24:39.040 --> 24:40.040]  I guess.
[24:40.040 --> 24:47.400]  Go to the feds now. Getting in front of a federal grand jury is tough. You're going
[24:47.400 --> 24:54.400]  to have a U.S. attorney trying to stand between you and the federal grand jury. I had one
[24:54.400 --> 24:59.800]  in Fort Lauderdale tell me that if I tried to reach the grand jury again, that he would
[24:59.800 --> 25:07.760]  charge me with jury tampering. I told him, well, I tell you what, you charge me with
[25:07.760 --> 25:14.520]  jury tampering. I'll charge you with obstruction and we'll see how this works out for you.
[25:14.520 --> 25:23.800]  The IRS agent we were going after, the next day I hear they fired the IRS agent. The reason
[25:23.800 --> 25:31.840]  they did that is I looked in the IRS manual. The IRS agent was trying to get to this guy
[25:31.840 --> 25:39.280]  and she couldn't get to him, so he had a friend who was a chiropractor. The agent went into
[25:39.280 --> 25:44.800]  the chiropractor's office and raided it. The agents walked in with their guns in their
[25:44.800 --> 25:53.000]  hands. The IRS manual said that a IRS agent could only unholster a pistol if they had
[25:53.000 --> 25:59.200]  grounds to draw and fire. Well, they walked in with them in their hands. So I wanted to
[25:59.200 --> 26:08.560]  know who is the highest level guy that has to approve one of these actions. And he was
[26:08.560 --> 26:16.080]  about four levels up. So we were trying to file against him criminally with the federal
[26:16.080 --> 26:25.760]  grand jury. See, we really didn't care about him. It's all about politics. But we go after
[26:25.760 --> 26:33.880]  him, the U.S. attorney intercepts it and tells him that we're going after him and shows him
[26:33.880 --> 26:40.840]  the complaint that we wrote. We accused this guy of personally doing what everybody did
[26:40.840 --> 26:46.600]  because he's responding at superior. Well, the U.S. attorney called me and threatened
[26:46.600 --> 26:53.000]  me and threatened the U.S. attorney right back and technically you cannot threaten
[26:53.000 --> 27:02.440]  to do what you have a perfect right to do. That's giving fair warning. So he gave me
[27:02.440 --> 27:09.800]  fair warning. I gave it right back to him. The next day they fired this IRS agent. They
[27:09.800 --> 27:16.560]  were trying to make my complaint moot. You will never win your case simply because you
[27:16.560 --> 27:22.680]  have the law and the facts on your side. You'll win the case if you have the politics on your
[27:22.680 --> 27:32.040]  side and all politics is local. Scott, sometimes a simple thing like that can bring you the
[27:32.040 --> 27:36.600]  most joy. I love it that there's actually a law on the book that tells those federal
[27:36.600 --> 27:42.800]  agents, don't go waving your guns around in people's faces. Keep it in the holster. That's
[27:42.800 --> 27:43.800]  great.
[27:43.800 --> 27:53.680]  Now, that's specific to IRS manual. There's probably something similar elsewhere. It's
[27:53.680 --> 27:59.760]  a big deal when I give them guns. Texas more so than anywhere else. In Texas, if a public
[27:59.760 --> 28:06.360]  official exerts or purports to exert an authority he doesn't have and in the process commits
[28:06.360 --> 28:14.000]  simple assault, what I'm claiming is arrest. Arrest is simple assault if you're offensive
[28:14.000 --> 28:21.320]  touching. If you do commit offensive touching while prominently displaying a deadly weapon,
[28:21.320 --> 28:29.760]  that's a second degree felony in the state of Texas unless you are a public official
[28:29.760 --> 28:37.400]  acting under the color or pretense of an official capacity in which case it is a felony of the
[28:37.400 --> 28:53.600]  first degree under Texas penal code 2202B2A. Now, I looked up B2A and B2B. B2B is where
[28:53.600 --> 28:59.440]  you interfere with a public servant in the performance of his duty while you're displaying
[28:59.440 --> 29:05.560]  a deadly weapon. Felony the first degree, I got 60,000 hits and that's all it would
[29:05.560 --> 29:13.040]  let me have on Lexus. There were more. I did B2A where a public official does it. I got
[29:13.040 --> 29:26.680]  zero. Never has that law been enforced. That's what they do. But I'm doing everything I can
[29:26.680 --> 29:34.240]  to enforce it. I just filed 45 complaints under that. When my last district judge passed
[29:34.240 --> 29:39.240]  away from a heart attack, I had him before the grand jury for first degree felony aggravated
[29:39.240 --> 29:46.880]  assault because he had a bailiff touch me. Let's dance, guys. Hang on, Randy Kelton,
[29:46.880 --> 29:57.480]  Brett Fountain, wheel of our radio. We'll be right back.
[29:57.480 --> 30:05.600]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk
[30:05.600 --> 30:09.840]  could predict how long you're going to live. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back
[30:09.840 --> 30:16.240]  to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment. Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.240 --> 30:20.640]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy
[30:20.640 --> 30:26.080]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say
[30:26.080 --> 30:31.400]  no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging
[30:31.400 --> 30:36.400]  on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private
[30:36.400 --> 30:43.520]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.520 --> 30:47.920]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live. The
[30:47.920 --> 30:52.480]  Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter
[30:52.480 --> 30:57.760]  per second or faster live longer than expected. In case you're wondering, one meter per second
[30:57.760 --> 31:02.640]  is about two and a quarter miles per hour. A senior's age, gender, and walking speed
[31:02.640 --> 31:07.160]  were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures.
[31:07.160 --> 31:12.960]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer. Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive.
[31:12.960 --> 31:17.360]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes. Researchers say it could
[31:17.360 --> 31:20.880]  help doctors identify older patients who need special care.
[31:20.880 --> 31:25.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:50.880 --> 31:55.440]  There is more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. Go
[31:55.440 --> 32:01.040]  to buildingwhat.org. Why it's health, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.040 --> 32:06.360]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year. Scripture Talk
[32:06.360 --> 32:12.440]  with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th, from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time. Our goal is
[32:12.440 --> 32:17.840]  in accord with Matthew 516. Let your light so shine before men that they may see your
[32:17.840 --> 32:23.360]  good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to reflect God's light
[32:23.360 --> 32:28.600]  and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Join Nana and guests for both verse by
[32:28.600 --> 32:35.120]  verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:35.120 --> 32:39.480]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss
[32:39.480 --> 32:45.200]  one chapter per week. Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound
[32:45.200 --> 32:50.920]  doctrine as well as Christian character development. So mark your calendar and join us live on
[32:50.920 --> 32:57.720]  LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring
[32:57.720 --> 33:23.720]  and motivating discussion of the Scriptures. Live Free Speech Radio LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:27.720 --> 33:51.840]  Okay, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rural Law Radio, and we're talking to Scott in
[33:51.840 --> 33:59.400]  Michigan. And if this sounds like one of my favorite things to talk about, you read that
[33:59.400 --> 34:09.680]  right, Scott. This is where we get them. We bore down into their codes and sting them
[34:09.680 --> 34:27.520]  where they live. So next we look at the criminal procedure code. Duties of prosecuting attorneys,
[34:27.520 --> 34:35.920]  duties of magistrates. Every state has to have magistrates. Technically, the prosecuting
[34:35.920 --> 34:43.920]  attorney should have no standing whatsoever to make a determination as to whether or not
[34:43.920 --> 34:52.560]  to prosecute. This requirement that a person be brought to a magistrate has been in law
[34:52.560 --> 35:00.920]  since 1215 A.D. Person gets arrested and they are to take them directly to the nearest magistrate,
[35:00.920 --> 35:10.680]  the policeman is, and explain himself. And this was a really important control. If you
[35:10.680 --> 35:18.360]  don't want the public and the police at each other's throats, then you put someone in between.
[35:18.360 --> 35:27.280]  The policeman pulls me over and I'm my usual demanding and obnoxious self. Well, the officer
[35:27.280 --> 35:36.640]  might want to do one of these attitude arrests. But if he knows, as soon as he makes the arrest,
[35:36.640 --> 35:44.080]  he's going to have to contact the magistrate and explain himself. That's going to temper
[35:44.080 --> 35:50.920]  his personal passions quite a bit. And if he also knows that the accused will have an
[35:50.920 --> 36:00.640]  opportunity to tell the magistrate his side, that's going to allow the person to feel like
[36:00.640 --> 36:09.280]  he has been hurt. In doing this show, we get people calling in. For the most part, we've
[36:09.280 --> 36:16.640]  got a few that call in regularly, one of them, that we want to take these guys on. But you've
[36:16.640 --> 36:22.080]  heard people call in the show and tell us how horrible the police are and all these awful
[36:22.080 --> 36:28.080]  things they've done and how they've been mistreated and all that. Most of the time, these people
[36:28.080 --> 36:37.960]  are not really calling in, looking for remedy. They just want to be heard. They want someone
[36:37.960 --> 36:46.160]  to listen to their side. And that's what magistrates were put there for in the first place.
[36:46.160 --> 36:53.880]  If a magistrate, it was intended that the police not hold a key to the jailhouse door.
[36:53.880 --> 37:00.160]  They gave that key to the magistrate. The policeman could make the arrest, but he could
[37:00.160 --> 37:05.880]  not imprison. And that was to keep the police and the public from being at odds with each
[37:05.880 --> 37:11.520]  other. Now, they might be upset at the magistrate for telling the policeman it's Rome in jail.
[37:11.520 --> 37:19.120]  But we elect the magistrate. So the magistrate's going to be somewhat more neutral. He realizes
[37:19.120 --> 37:27.280]  he's having one of his voters thrown in jail. That's not going to be good unless the voter
[37:27.280 --> 37:34.680]  doesn't feel like he's been abused by the process. That's been taken out of the system.
[37:34.680 --> 37:42.120]  You need it back. You're in Michigan. Every state has a requirement to do a preliminary
[37:42.120 --> 37:55.480]  hearing. And what that leads to is every time a police officer issues a criminal complaint,
[37:55.480 --> 38:03.440]  he's to take it to that magistrate. I don't see how in any state with the requirement
[38:03.440 --> 38:11.560]  for a preliminary hearing can give prosecutor all discretion to a prosecutor. It has to
[38:11.560 --> 38:20.400]  be in the hands of a magistrate. Scott, that's got to be in there. Look up magistrates or
[38:20.400 --> 38:29.040]  preliminary hearings in Michigan. Gerstein-Pew case said everybody has to do that. It is
[38:29.040 --> 38:37.320]  a federal due process requirement. Am I making sense, Scott?
[38:37.320 --> 38:43.440]  Yeah. It bothers me a lot contemplating the idea that they have like deleted that step
[38:43.440 --> 38:49.440]  for the purpose of officer convenience. Yeah, they did that here too. That's what
[38:49.440 --> 38:58.040]  I'm working on. If there is a solution to this mass incarceration and this longer heads
[38:58.040 --> 39:05.680]  we find ourselves at between the public and the police, it's the magistrate. He was put
[39:05.680 --> 39:13.800]  there to keep this from happening. They were originally put there 800 years ago. It was
[39:13.800 --> 39:22.960]  a good idea then. It's a good idea now. And it is in our federal law. If someone is bypassing
[39:22.960 --> 39:35.160]  that step, here's how I'm going after it in Texas. In the section on an examining trial,
[39:35.160 --> 39:40.560]  most states call it a preliminary hearing. In Texas, they call it an examining trial.
[39:40.560 --> 39:46.400]  That's where a magistrate makes a determination of probable cause. If a policeman arrests
[39:46.400 --> 39:52.080]  someone, takes them to magistrate and a magistrate looks at his probable cause and says, well,
[39:52.080 --> 40:02.160]  it's not sufficient. Baba, you can go home. The court never gets jurisdiction. The only
[40:02.160 --> 40:12.400]  way a court can get jurisdiction and be in paramateria in overall compliance with the
[40:12.400 --> 40:20.480]  federal and state constitutional requirements is through a determination by a neutral magistrate.
[40:20.480 --> 40:31.440]  And it's clear in Texas, the magistrate is to hold an examining trial. And before examining
[40:31.440 --> 40:40.280]  any witnesses, they must give the accused an opportunity to make a statement. Now, I know
[40:40.280 --> 40:48.280]  what every lawyer is going to say. That's probably a bad idea. And I agree. It's probably
[40:48.280 --> 40:59.960]  a bad idea. But they have that right. It is in black letter law. On the one hand, it's
[40:59.960 --> 41:08.240]  a bad idea. But on the other, from the government side, it gives that person an opportunity
[41:08.240 --> 41:17.640]  to be heard. And once the person makes his statement, if the JP says, okay, I've looked
[41:17.640 --> 41:23.880]  at both sides, and yeah, there's sufficient probable cause here. The person is not going
[41:23.880 --> 41:34.200]  to feel like he's been outgunned by the system. He at least got to make, you know, to say
[41:34.200 --> 41:39.960]  his piece. And if a policeman knows that he's going to have to take the person directly
[41:39.960 --> 41:45.320]  to the nearest magistrate and explain himself, he's going to be a lot more careful about
[41:45.320 --> 41:55.240]  the kinds of arrests he makes. If we can get that put back in, it is my position that the
[41:55.240 --> 42:04.200]  vast amount of the problems we're having between the public and the police will simply go away.
[42:04.200 --> 42:09.800]  We don't need any new law. It's already in there. And I almost bet, Scott, it's in your
[42:09.800 --> 42:19.720]  code. I can't see how a court can get jurisdiction. In Texas, once the magistrate finds probable
[42:19.720 --> 42:25.480]  cause or just has the hearing, he's to seal all the documents had in the hearing, because
[42:25.480 --> 42:29.720]  his name could be written across the seal of the document and forwarded to the clerk
[42:29.720 --> 42:39.520]  of the court of jurisdiction. If the magistrate finds probable cause, he has jurisdiction
[42:39.520 --> 42:45.680]  for the purpose of making that determination. If he finds probable cause, that gives the
[42:45.680 --> 42:52.080]  trial court jurisdiction. I can't find another way the trial court can get it. So it's got
[42:52.080 --> 42:56.280]  to be in your law, Scott. Am I making sensors? It's just getting confusing.
[42:56.280 --> 43:02.080]  No, absolutely. Yeah, I appreciate the level of detail. And I know what you're telling
[43:02.080 --> 43:04.880]  me to do, and I know how to do it.
[43:04.880 --> 43:13.360]  Good. Call us back next week and give us the scoop. Can I ask one more thing?
[43:13.360 --> 43:23.160]  Absolutely. So Brett mentioned before I came on the guy who had the resisting arrest without
[43:23.160 --> 43:29.600]  a good cause for being arrested. And Brett said, when they arrest you, either with a warrant
[43:29.600 --> 43:35.920]  or for an arrestable offense. And please, I hear that phrase arrestable offense in the
[43:35.920 --> 43:41.920]  alarm belt that's hanging in my head. Probably we're getting close to a break to the account
[43:41.920 --> 43:42.920]  or something.
[43:42.920 --> 43:49.960]  Yes, we are. Hang on. Randy Kelham, Brett Fountain, we're with our radio. I'm not going
[43:49.960 --> 43:54.920]  to give out the call in number yet. We have four on the line, and that's all it'll hold
[43:54.920 --> 44:00.560]  since someone drops off. Then I'll give out the number. We'll be right back.
[44:00.560 --> 44:05.160]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[44:05.160 --> 44:09.880]  of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we
[44:09.880 --> 44:15.960]  changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[44:15.960 --> 44:21.120]  is good nutrition. In a world where natural fruits have been irradiated, adulterated and
[44:21.120 --> 44:27.840]  mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logo Radio Network gets many requests
[44:27.840 --> 44:33.200]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity
[44:33.200 --> 44:39.120]  so much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many
[44:39.120 --> 44:46.000]  others. When you order from LogoRadioNetwork.com, you're health will improve as you help support
[44:46.000 --> 44:53.120]  quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[44:53.120 --> 44:59.160]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[44:59.160 --> 45:05.880]  Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[45:05.880 --> 45:11.480]  with Jurisdictionary. The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show
[45:11.480 --> 45:18.200]  you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should
[45:18.200 --> 45:23.520]  be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands
[45:23.520 --> 45:29.480]  have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[45:29.480 --> 45:35.400]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in
[45:35.400 --> 45:41.000]  a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[45:41.000 --> 45:46.920]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[45:46.920 --> 45:54.920]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[45:54.920 --> 46:22.920]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.920 --> 46:47.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Scott
[46:47.120 --> 46:56.600]  Mishkin. Okay, go ahead, Scott. So arrestable offenses, I think that's something that shouldn't
[46:56.600 --> 47:06.200]  be a given part of our vocabulary because the only arrestable offenses are felonies
[47:06.200 --> 47:14.760]  or breaches of the peace as far as what's codified into a law in the broader sense or
[47:14.760 --> 47:21.760]  in the historical sense. And now that we live in this system of statutes and codes, that
[47:21.760 --> 47:29.880]  list gets bigger every day, but it's not a trivial distinction. It's actually really
[47:29.880 --> 47:36.920]  important for an individual person to know when they might be amenable to arrest. And
[47:36.920 --> 47:43.600]  if there's this whole huge category of arrestable offenses, I see that as very problematic. And
[47:43.600 --> 47:54.400]  that actually is, I guess, the title and first chapter of the battle that I am about to initiate
[47:54.400 --> 48:01.840]  here, which is challenging the constitutionality of a statute that says, hey, we can arrest
[48:01.840 --> 48:09.880]  you without a warrant for this misdemeanor, essentially on suspicion without need of an
[48:09.880 --> 48:15.320]  actual arrest warrant. I think that's a huge problem because, again, like we were talking
[48:15.320 --> 48:21.160]  earlier, it does come down, essentially, to the officer's discretion. And if he feels
[48:21.160 --> 48:27.480]  enabled by the statutes and codes, you know, where are the checks and balances?
[48:27.480 --> 48:35.520]  The magistrate. Yeah, it's supposed to be. You go before him and he says whether or not
[48:35.520 --> 48:42.320]  there was probable cause. And if that police officer starts showing a pattern of dragging
[48:42.320 --> 48:46.280]  everybody in there for no reason, that's going to look bad on him.
[48:46.280 --> 48:58.160]  Yeah, and the judge will toss him. That's exactly why the magistrates were put in place.
[48:58.160 --> 49:07.480]  The case law speaks to it and says that the zeal in enforcing law that an officer has
[49:07.480 --> 49:15.760]  is generally not enough to ensure fair treatment. That was the reason they put the magistrate
[49:15.760 --> 49:24.760]  in place. I'm not saying that the policemen are bad guys, just that they are focused on
[49:24.760 --> 49:32.800]  committing crime and punishing those who, arresting those who do commit crime, so they're not
[49:32.800 --> 49:43.280]  a good neutral judge. The same reason prosecutors are not under code allowed to make this decision.
[49:43.280 --> 49:55.280]  We seem to recall reading even a phrase that they were over-eager in ferreting out crime.
[49:55.280 --> 50:00.040]  Yeah, and that's reasonable because that's what their focus is. That's what they do.
[50:00.040 --> 50:08.400]  So that makes them not a good neutral party to determine, you know, the cops going to
[50:08.400 --> 50:13.400]  weigh things to his side, the accused going to weigh them to their side, we need somebody
[50:13.400 --> 50:16.680]  to find the middle ground. Right now, we're going to...
[50:16.680 --> 50:18.400]  That's what the law provides.
[50:18.400 --> 50:24.400]  It's exactly what it provides. And you've got to be in there, Scott.
[50:24.400 --> 50:25.400]  All right, so...
[50:25.400 --> 50:26.400]  Yes, Scott, take a look.
[50:26.400 --> 50:36.600]  I want to take in the task and this idea of the fact that they've passed a local ordinance
[50:36.600 --> 50:42.200]  that says, we can arrest you without a warrant. I want to challenge the constitutionality
[50:42.200 --> 50:43.800]  of that local...
[50:43.800 --> 50:56.360]  Okay, okay, local ordinance. What does your constitution say about who can create law?
[50:56.360 --> 51:03.280]  Let me explain why I asked it that way. Texas Constitution authorizes the legislature to
[51:03.280 --> 51:13.760]  create law. It authorizes the legislature also to create courts as they need them. The legislature
[51:13.760 --> 51:23.360]  has authorized municipalities to write ordinances. They don't call them ordinances for no good
[51:23.360 --> 51:33.200]  reason. If they call them law, then that would violate the constitution because the constitution
[51:33.200 --> 51:38.400]  only authorizes the legislature to write law.
[51:38.400 --> 51:48.760]  So municipalities can write ordinances. And ordinances only apply to the municipality,
[51:48.760 --> 51:54.760]  to employees of the municipality, because it's a municipal corporation, or those in
[51:54.760 --> 52:03.920]  contractual privity with the municipal corporation. If the municipal police attempt to apply the
[52:03.920 --> 52:13.680]  ordinances to the public in general, that becomes a law. And they can't write law. That's
[52:13.680 --> 52:18.880]  the constitution of challenge to bring from municipal ordinances. Does that make sense,
[52:18.880 --> 52:19.880]  Scott?
[52:19.880 --> 52:26.200]  Yes, but I believe there'd be a bigger Magna Carta challenge as far as this arrest without
[52:26.200 --> 52:30.480]  a warrant. You know, one of the fundamental guarantees of the Magna Carta going all the
[52:30.480 --> 52:36.560]  way back is that you can only be arrested with a warrant. And then we have the Fourth
[52:36.560 --> 52:42.120]  Amendment that is nice enough to say that if the specified the person or the places.
[52:42.120 --> 52:47.360]  So the idea that they say we can arrest you without a warrant and they don't specify persons
[52:47.360 --> 52:56.480]  or places, it does something called retaining the particulars of suspicion for the crown.
[52:56.480 --> 53:01.800]  And it has the effect of issuing a general warrant, which is one of the things that the
[53:01.800 --> 53:06.480]  Magna Carta, you know, tried to root out.
[53:06.480 --> 53:12.920]  Okay, retaining the what? Say that again. I'm trying to write it down.
[53:12.920 --> 53:22.800]  And so arresting somebody without a warrant for a misdemeanor does something called retaining
[53:22.800 --> 53:31.160]  the particulars of suspicion for the crown. Meaning they get to go around being, you
[53:31.160 --> 53:37.240]  know, they get to go around just assuming that you're guilty before there's any kind
[53:37.240 --> 53:43.120]  of due process. And so they can arrest you, you know, on suspicion.
[53:43.120 --> 53:49.880]  Okay, and the Magna Carta was put in place. The Magna Carta, the original Magna Carta
[53:49.880 --> 53:59.240]  Libertarium 1215 AD was put in place, I'm sorry, they put in place magistrates to fix
[53:59.240 --> 54:09.040]  that problem. Because the magistrate will not maintain the particulars of suspicion
[54:09.040 --> 54:17.280]  if they are insufficient. They have to give the particulars to the magistrate immediately.
[54:17.280 --> 54:23.720]  And if the magistrate doesn't find sufficient cause, he sends the person home. That was
[54:23.720 --> 54:29.480]  there to fix it. There needed to be a way for the police to
[54:29.480 --> 54:42.000]  interdict in crime in progress. In Texas 14.06, I'm sorry, 14.03 authorizes a peace officer
[54:42.000 --> 54:50.520]  to arrest someone if an offense is committed in their sight or in their hearing. Or they
[54:50.520 --> 54:57.800]  can arrest on a felony that they did not see or hear if they were notified by someone
[54:57.800 --> 55:09.560]  else. And there is the likelihood that the accused will escape custody. But in both cases,
[55:09.560 --> 55:18.160]  they are to take that person directly to the nearest magistrate by the most direct route
[55:18.160 --> 55:26.800]  and explain themselves. That would seem to address your issue. Now, your issue is absolutely
[55:26.800 --> 55:34.400]  valid because they're not doing that now. And I am absolutely going to use this quote.
[55:34.400 --> 55:45.640]  That is a great turn of phrase. Thank you. Okay. If you're concerned about that issue,
[55:45.640 --> 55:52.600]  you should be concerned about getting magistrates put back where they're supposed to be. Now,
[55:52.600 --> 55:58.440]  these guys know about magistrates. They catch a really bad guy. I was watching one of these
[55:58.440 --> 56:04.600]  cops programs and they chased this guy. He was a murder suspect. And they finally caught
[56:04.600 --> 56:09.680]  him, pulled him out of the car. And one of the policemen asked the other, where is the
[56:09.680 --> 56:18.800]  nearest magistrate? They knew. This was a really bad guy. They wanted to make sure that
[56:18.800 --> 56:23.960]  he didn't get off on a technicality. So they took him straight to the nearest magistrate.
[56:23.960 --> 56:30.520]  But they knew full well that was a requirement. They just ignore it. Yeah. Yeah, with advantageous
[56:30.520 --> 56:34.960]  to them or when they don't want to get caught with their pants down, they're careful to
[56:34.960 --> 56:41.800]  follow it. But otherwise, it's something that can easily be. So let's let's start jerking
[56:41.800 --> 56:49.320]  their pants down at every opportunity. That's why I filed against 45 police officers for
[56:49.320 --> 56:54.280]  arresting someone and taking them to jail. I don't care what there is. The circumstances
[56:54.280 --> 57:03.560]  of the arrest war is irrelevant. They could be a mass murder, kill 50 children. They still
[57:03.560 --> 57:12.280]  have to take him to a magistrate. So I'm after that. And the lawyers, I think probably will
[57:12.280 --> 57:18.240]  turn out to be the most powerful tool, is filed against the lawyers for not addressing
[57:18.240 --> 57:24.720]  the fact that they weren't taken before a magistrate. But look at Michigan law and call
[57:24.720 --> 57:28.440]  us next week. Brett, you have some information on that.
[57:28.440 --> 57:38.440]  I just wanted to mention that you can take a look at scottacourts.michigan.gov. And you'll
[57:38.440 --> 57:47.640]  see there in Michigan court rules, it has Chapter 6, Criminal Procedure. And there's
[57:47.640 --> 57:52.080]  a couple of things that I thought were probably interesting for you to drill into and kind
[57:52.080 --> 58:04.000]  of really rock it. There's a 6.108, the Probable Cause Conference, and 6.110, the Preliminary
[58:04.000 --> 58:08.720]  Examination. Those might be worth checking out.
[58:08.720 --> 58:13.560]  Yeah, I know I've read that program on the second deterrent.
[58:13.560 --> 58:21.200]  Okay, I think you were too close to the mic. You were distorted. Say that again.
[58:21.200 --> 58:25.800]  Okay. Yeah, I've read that before and I'll definitely double check it because it sounds
[58:25.800 --> 58:33.320]  like it does keep that issue. Okay, call back next week and let us know
[58:33.320 --> 58:37.680]  how this shakes out. All right, thanks, gentlemen.
[58:37.680 --> 58:50.280]  Okay, thank you, Scott. Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, Will LaRidio. We'll be right back.
[58:50.280 --> 58:55.280]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America
[58:55.280 --> 59:00.960]  is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.960 --> 59:05.280]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.280 --> 59:09.880]  today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.880 --> 59:13.400]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.400 --> 59:18.680]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter
[59:18.680 --> 59:24.320]  by Chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life, clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.320 --> 59:29.920]  growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery
[59:29.920 --> 59:36.440]  version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at
[59:36.440 --> 59:49.440]  888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.440 --> 59:59.440]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[59:59.440 --> 01:00:06.760]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns.
[01:00:06.760 --> 01:00:13.120]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[01:00:13.120 --> 01:00:21.440]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[01:00:21.440 --> 01:00:29.420]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52. If there
[01:00:29.420 --> 01:00:46.120]  are $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $1.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:46.120 --> 01:00:52.400]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day Bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[01:00:52.400 --> 01:00:57.720]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[01:00:57.720 --> 01:01:04.720]  10 and injuring 40.
[01:01:04.720 --> 01:01:05.720]  And recent news.
[01:01:05.720 --> 01:01:10.400]  Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hemp and Attacks's law back
[01:01:10.400 --> 01:01:15.080]  in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio,
[01:01:15.080 --> 01:01:19.080]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they
[01:01:19.080 --> 01:01:23.160]  are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the
[01:01:23.160 --> 01:01:27.760]  error for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier
[01:01:27.760 --> 01:01:32.480]  this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:01:32.480 --> 01:01:33.680]  because of the law.
[01:01:33.680 --> 01:01:37.560]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:01:37.560 --> 01:01:42.040]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:42.040 --> 01:01:48.200]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:01:48.200 --> 01:01:54.440]  well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:01:54.440 --> 01:01:58.920]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:01:58.920 --> 01:02:01.720]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.720 --> 01:02:06.720]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[01:02:06.720 --> 01:02:10.720]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[01:02:10.720 --> 01:02:13.440]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.440 --> 01:02:17.320]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[01:02:17.320 --> 01:02:22.560]  charged with.
[01:02:22.560 --> 01:02:27.200]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark
[01:02:27.200 --> 01:02:32.320]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[01:02:32.320 --> 01:02:37.960]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[01:02:37.960 --> 01:02:39.460]  Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.460 --> 01:02:43.760]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[01:02:43.760 --> 01:02:50.040]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[01:02:50.040 --> 01:03:19.240]  glow.
[01:03:20.040 --> 01:03:36.800]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we were on radio and we were about to go
[01:03:36.800 --> 01:03:40.240]  to a caller who just dropped off.
[01:03:40.240 --> 01:03:45.640]  It looked like a first time caller because he wasn't in the database.
[01:03:45.640 --> 01:03:52.320]  If you are from California and you just dropped off, give us a call back.
[01:03:52.320 --> 01:03:57.640]  We are going to Irvin Irwin, Irvin in Nevada.
[01:03:57.640 --> 01:03:59.640]  Hello Irvin.
[01:03:59.640 --> 01:04:01.640]  Hello.
[01:04:01.640 --> 01:04:06.640]  What do you have for us today?
[01:04:06.640 --> 01:04:14.640]  Hmm, looks like Irvin just dropped off too.
[01:04:14.640 --> 01:04:23.640]  Let's see, let's try the 505 number again.
[01:04:23.640 --> 01:04:32.640]  If you are on a 505 exchange, I think that's the Mexico.
[01:04:32.640 --> 01:04:36.640]  Talk to us.
[01:04:36.640 --> 01:04:39.640]  Yeah, we lost that one too.
[01:04:39.640 --> 01:04:40.640]  Okay.
[01:04:40.640 --> 01:04:41.640]  Irvin's back.
[01:04:41.640 --> 01:04:48.640]  There we go.
[01:04:48.640 --> 01:04:49.640]  No, that's Scott.
[01:04:49.640 --> 01:04:52.640]  Now I am in the 10, California just came in.
[01:04:52.640 --> 01:04:54.640]  Let's try Irvin again.
[01:04:54.640 --> 01:04:55.640]  Irvin, are you there?
[01:04:55.640 --> 01:04:56.640]  Yeah, I'm here.
[01:04:56.640 --> 01:04:59.640]  Okay, that's, we seem like we lost you for a minute there.
[01:04:59.640 --> 01:05:00.640]  Okay.
[01:05:00.640 --> 01:05:01.640]  Yeah.
[01:05:01.640 --> 01:05:03.640]  What do you have for us?
[01:05:03.640 --> 01:05:15.640]  First I will make the observation since the gentleman, or you mentioned that it's funny or not really funny that they felt compelled to say, you know, you can't be waving your guns around people.
[01:05:15.640 --> 01:05:32.640]  Well, I have a similar view, much less dangerous of course, that the anti-bribery statement that judges are supposed to produce has said, someone long ago said, okay, we're going to hire public officials and you would think we'd be self-evident that you shouldn't take a bribe.
[01:05:32.640 --> 01:05:34.640]  Okay, so let's just put that in there.
[01:05:34.640 --> 01:05:40.640]  And I've noticed when I asked them to produce it, they get to do so too.
[01:05:40.640 --> 01:05:56.640]  But I wanted to let Brett know that I appreciate all the information he did for filing a bargain against those lawyers in Florida who's trying to foreclose on a senior citizen's home because of tall grass.
[01:05:56.640 --> 01:06:04.640]  And I have been filled out to send and I found the fax number, I posted it on the site.
[01:06:04.640 --> 01:06:05.640]  Oh, great.
[01:06:05.640 --> 01:06:06.640]  Telegram.
[01:06:06.640 --> 01:06:08.640]  Yeah, yeah, so that should be good.
[01:06:08.640 --> 01:06:09.640]  It's horrendous.
[01:06:09.640 --> 01:06:15.640]  I'm also kind of sensitive to that too because I mentioned it in my state anyway, I think there's maybe 20 to have this.
[01:06:15.640 --> 01:06:26.640]  There's a statute and deceptive trade practices against older people, older and or disabled persons, they use the one-upper persons.
[01:06:26.640 --> 01:06:30.640]  And they have two things, it's 0973 and 0977.
[01:06:30.640 --> 01:06:44.640]  0973 for the government says that the government can find the offender of 12,500 per offence, but it leaves the sign up for the 0977 is for the senior citizens with disabled people.
[01:06:44.640 --> 01:06:47.640]  And that leaves it up to them, which I thought was interesting.
[01:06:47.640 --> 01:06:53.640]  So I mean, Florida being, you know, they have probably more senior citizens than any place else.
[01:06:53.640 --> 01:07:04.640]  But at least, and so that gentleman, maybe you can just be a judge and look that up too, because that's, that's, you know, be on the pale, what they're doing.
[01:07:04.640 --> 01:07:17.640]  Yeah, Randy, what this was is there was a gentleman in Florida and he, he had to go and travel and take care of something about his mother, I believe it was.
[01:07:17.640 --> 01:07:32.640]  And while he was gone, his lawn care, he has a guy take care of his lawn when he's gone and his lawn care guy passed away while the guy was the homeowner was traveling.
[01:07:32.640 --> 01:07:41.640]  And the city decided to come and measure his grass and they said that it was too tall and they started charging him a whole bunch of money.
[01:07:41.640 --> 01:07:53.640]  And he didn't know about it until when he got back, he tried to mow his lawn and his lawnmower broke because it was too tall and he found out that the lawn guy had passed away.
[01:07:53.640 --> 01:08:04.640]  And, and then he got called back to go to out of state again, deal with his mother had something out with some kind of a probate situation, he had to leave town again.
[01:08:04.640 --> 01:08:12.640]  And, and in the meantime, the city held a hearing on his tall grass problem.
[01:08:12.640 --> 01:08:16.640]  And of course, he wasn't there for the hearing, so they ruled against him.
[01:08:16.640 --> 01:08:26.640]  And next thing you know, they are wanting to collect 30 grand for his tall grass.
[01:08:26.640 --> 01:08:34.640]  So I use that as an opportunity to just kind of walk through the process of how do you do a bar grievance. And I've never bar grieved anybody in Florida before.
[01:08:34.640 --> 01:08:45.640]  So it was also an opportunity to demonstrate how do we start from scratch, not knowing anything about the jurisdiction.
[01:08:45.640 --> 01:08:53.640]  And we just went step by step and got to the point where we file a bar grievance.
[01:08:53.640 --> 01:08:59.640]  And so that's, that's what this, this fun is that he's talking about.
[01:08:59.640 --> 01:09:14.640]  Yeah. And by the way, you diligent in that the local newspaper had a photo of the homeowner holding up the letter he got from the bar man get attorney and the you or someone else to be like if
[01:09:14.640 --> 01:09:23.640]  there's a scene glass thing and said, Hey, I can see the law firm is on there, which meant to your big, big digging coming up.
[01:09:23.640 --> 01:09:28.640]  I also mentioned a woman who was 75 for the same deal. She didn't show.
[01:09:28.640 --> 01:09:34.640]  So they did the obligatory, you know, war for her rest failure to appear for tall grass.
[01:09:34.640 --> 01:09:37.640]  And I think you said grass did what it does when you don't cut it.
[01:09:37.640 --> 01:09:44.640]  So it grew with no shocker, you know, and it's just.
[01:09:44.640 --> 01:09:46.640]  I think I have a nice.
[01:09:46.640 --> 01:09:49.640]  I'm expecting this pleasure coming up.
[01:09:49.640 --> 01:09:51.640]  I've never over this pleasure for them.
[01:09:51.640 --> 01:09:53.640]  And I'm going to get that out there.
[01:09:53.640 --> 01:09:55.640]  And I just like to see the expression.
[01:09:55.640 --> 01:09:56.640]  It's going to space this window.
[01:09:56.640 --> 01:09:57.640]  Car grievances are pouring.
[01:09:57.640 --> 01:10:00.640]  I think you were up to seven or eight people as I saw it.
[01:10:00.640 --> 01:10:08.640]  And the other thing was mentioned was on our house.
[01:10:08.640 --> 01:10:19.640]  We had filed a rescission of signature and time ago and the title, the trustee or the public title.
[01:10:19.640 --> 01:10:25.640]  Not long after they filed a notice of rescission of invalid release and reconvance.
[01:10:25.640 --> 01:10:30.640]  And I just went, oh, okay.
[01:10:30.640 --> 01:10:35.640]  And I thought now that I've become aware, you know, some different tactics.
[01:10:35.640 --> 01:10:41.640]  And I couldn't even find the documents that they go all the way down town and get it again, but I wanted to get some of it anyway.
[01:10:41.640 --> 01:10:51.640]  And I come to find out that the person who signed it is chief of vice president or a vice president of all the public title in their Glendale, California office.
[01:10:51.640 --> 01:10:53.640]  And she's an attorney.
[01:10:53.640 --> 01:11:03.640]  And so let's see my notices here by given that the deed and release the reconvenced recorded blah blah blah and soon blah blah blah just not be conveyed the trust recorded in the office.
[01:11:03.640 --> 01:11:09.640]  And they mentioned that the, that the borrowers are the...
[01:11:09.640 --> 01:11:14.440]  of ours, Marisoli is nominee for the guaranteed rate incorporated as the beneficiary and
[01:11:14.440 --> 01:11:17.640]  over public title as a trustee indeed of trust.
[01:11:17.640 --> 01:11:22.480]  And so it says this court has reconvenced states that the indebtedness has been satisfied.
[01:11:22.480 --> 01:11:23.480]  This is not correct.
[01:11:23.480 --> 01:11:28.280]  It has not been satisfied and remained outstanding and secure about the above deed of trust.
[01:11:28.280 --> 01:11:33.320]  So I think I'm going to do a bar grievance on Ms. Perk, which was just the vice president
[01:11:33.320 --> 01:11:34.320]  and attorney.
[01:11:34.320 --> 01:11:39.880]  And, you know, said, who God made you to came here to talk about admonishing my property
[01:11:39.880 --> 01:11:43.920]  because this was done on the same which I think I mentioned before about the clause,
[01:11:43.920 --> 01:11:46.160]  the recubanance clause or the lease clause.
[01:11:46.160 --> 01:11:49.320]  It's in most mortgages of the trustee, I don't know how to say it anyway.
[01:11:49.320 --> 01:11:54.760]  It says that the original lender is paid, they supposed to arrange for a certificate
[01:11:54.760 --> 01:12:00.280]  of title or instruct the trustee and the deed of trustee to lease the property.
[01:12:00.280 --> 01:12:05.600]  And, of course, when I confronted, when we confronted the original so-called lender about
[01:12:05.600 --> 01:12:09.080]  that, they first hand and hold and try not to answer, finally they said, you know, okay,
[01:12:09.080 --> 01:12:10.960]  we sold it, so what?
[01:12:10.960 --> 01:12:13.280]  And so that's what we're kind of going after.
[01:12:13.280 --> 01:12:20.080]  But again, these title companies who are supposed to be a neutral third party, that's a joke.
[01:12:20.080 --> 01:12:25.280]  In fact, I mean, in my state, not that many years ago, they passed something that said
[01:12:25.280 --> 01:12:31.720]  that there shouldn't be any connection between the trustee and the lender, you think?
[01:12:31.720 --> 01:12:37.920]  But I read that very situation with Bank of America, NMAC or something like that was in
[01:12:37.920 --> 01:12:42.840]  the very same building in what Charlotte, Bank of America, has headquartered.
[01:12:42.840 --> 01:12:48.520]  And so, you know, the trustees aren't even neutrals, it's just pulling, you know, they're
[01:12:48.520 --> 01:12:49.520]  just flying.
[01:12:49.520 --> 01:12:54.520]  You would think that's so obvious, it wouldn't even have to be mentioned.
[01:12:54.520 --> 01:12:58.400]  So, yeah, then they go ahead and make a rule about it and do it anyway.
[01:12:58.400 --> 01:13:01.400]  Right, yeah, that's the killer.
[01:13:01.400 --> 01:13:06.680]  They don't follow their own rules when it's convenient.
[01:13:06.680 --> 01:13:10.040]  And you mentioned the gentleman also mentioned something about the grand juries.
[01:13:10.040 --> 01:13:15.360]  I recall, I had a property genius in place and I contacted, tried to contact the U.S.
[01:13:15.360 --> 01:13:21.840]  Attorney and the woman tried to say that they only convened, I think I read it was important
[01:13:21.840 --> 01:13:25.360]  to find out when the grand jury convened or meets or whatever.
[01:13:25.360 --> 01:13:32.680]  And she claimed that they didn't do so at all unless there were so many, the population
[01:13:32.680 --> 01:13:33.680]  was so great.
[01:13:33.680 --> 01:13:37.520]  And I was writing to Fredericksburg, Virginia, the eastern part of the, you know, I mean,
[01:13:37.520 --> 01:13:42.400]  I don't know much about Virginia, but I think the western part is, it's part of the populated
[01:13:42.400 --> 01:13:43.400]  compared to the east.
[01:13:43.400 --> 01:13:47.520]  But I was writing to the east and so I think she was going to plug me off.
[01:13:47.520 --> 01:13:53.440]  And, you know, then hiding the grand jury, that just seems to be completely wrong as
[01:13:53.440 --> 01:13:54.440]  well.
[01:13:54.440 --> 01:13:57.960]  And I came across, sometimes I think I want to send it to you, Randy, it's entitled
[01:13:57.960 --> 01:13:58.960]  grand jury status.
[01:13:58.960 --> 01:14:04.840]  And just the first two paragraphs, it says, we the people have been perpetually provided
[01:14:04.840 --> 01:14:10.080]  legal recourse to address the criminal conduct of persons themselves and trust that dispense
[01:14:10.080 --> 01:14:11.080]  justice.
[01:14:11.080 --> 01:14:15.080]  And it's the Supreme Court case of the United States versus Williams, which was, blah, blah,
[01:14:15.080 --> 01:14:20.920]  blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
[01:14:20.920 --> 01:14:25.740]  blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
[01:14:25.740 --> 01:14:28.000]  blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:32.760]  And the police are it your boo-boo, buddy, are you listening to me?
[01:14:32.760 --> 01:14:33.760]  Is that your boo-boo?
[01:14:33.760 --> 01:14:37.800]  and on behalf of the American people, and to throw the inmates in the bill of
[01:14:37.800 --> 01:14:41.920]  rights. The citizens have been, and this is the last part, have been on the unbridled
[01:14:41.920 --> 01:14:45.800]  right to impanel their own grand juries and present true bills of indictment to
[01:14:45.800 --> 01:14:51.080]  the court, which is then required to commence criminal proceeding. Our founding
[01:14:51.080 --> 01:14:56.640]  fathers, presently thereby created a buffer people marry or lie upon for
[01:14:56.640 --> 01:15:00.840]  justice. Public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law, which
[01:15:00.840 --> 01:15:04.480]  kind of touched on poor, which was Mr. Randi about, you know, you don't want them
[01:15:04.480 --> 01:15:08.640]  having police in the public if they do a throw. So, oh, and actual practice, oh,
[01:15:08.640 --> 01:15:13.920]  this doesn't seem to really work that way, does it? So, it's hard.
[01:15:13.920 --> 01:15:20.320]  Will you read that part about the citizens may impanel their own grand
[01:15:20.320 --> 01:15:27.920]  jury? Oh, okay, sure. Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to impanel their own
[01:15:27.920 --> 01:15:33.880]  grand juries and present, quote, true bills, unquote, of indictment to a court,
[01:15:33.880 --> 01:15:39.360]  which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our founding fathers,
[01:15:39.360 --> 01:15:45.280]  presently thereby created a buffer that people may or lie upon for justice, and
[01:15:45.280 --> 01:15:49.040]  public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law, then it has,
[01:15:49.040 --> 01:15:53.640]  that was the case here. Scroll down a bit for a second. United States Petitioner
[01:15:53.640 --> 01:15:58.520]  v. John H. Williams, this is from 1972. It's got all the 112, blah, blah, blah,
[01:15:58.520 --> 01:16:04.280]  but anyway, so that's the story. Can you email me a link to that case? I've
[01:16:04.280 --> 01:16:10.760]  actually read the case before, but I didn't remember it. About the fourth grand
[01:16:10.760 --> 01:16:15.840]  jury, I've actually quoted that, but I forgot in what case it was. Will you send
[01:16:15.840 --> 01:16:21.400]  me a link to that? Yeah, yeah, this is a PDF file that's
[01:16:21.400 --> 01:16:27.040]  24 pages. It has some things highlighted in yellow, but it looks, I don't even
[01:16:27.040 --> 01:16:33.240]  remember. Just send me a link to, just to send me the case law, the case, and I can
[01:16:33.240 --> 01:16:43.400]  look it up. Right, right, right. Okay, one more question. Okay, hang on, Randy
[01:16:43.400 --> 01:16:49.680]  Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rural Law Radio, our calling number, looks like we're still
[01:16:49.680 --> 01:16:57.600]  four. We've got a couple of dead calls on the line, so we'll be right back.
[01:16:59.160 --> 01:17:04.720]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[01:17:04.720 --> 01:17:09.560]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. Michael Mearris
[01:17:09.560 --> 01:17:13.560]  has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can
[01:17:13.560 --> 01:17:17.640]  win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to
[01:17:17.640 --> 01:17:22.160]  win in court using federal civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by
[01:17:22.160 --> 01:17:26.760]  phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get
[01:17:26.760 --> 01:17:30.800]  debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them
[01:17:30.800 --> 01:17:35.720]  and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the
[01:17:35.720 --> 01:17:40.360]  solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as
[01:17:40.360 --> 01:17:45.120]  well. For more information, please visit RuralLawRadio.com and click on the blue
[01:17:45.120 --> 01:17:52.200]  Michael Mearris banner, or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. That's RuralLawRadio.com, or email
[01:17:52.200 --> 01:17:59.400]  M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:17:59.400 --> 01:18:04.120]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my
[01:18:04.120 --> 01:18:07.800]  friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my
[01:18:07.800 --> 01:18:12.240]  truth stick. I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this
[01:18:12.240 --> 01:18:15.600]  network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a
[01:18:15.600 --> 01:18:19.400]  Luddite, and I really don't have any money to give, because I spent it all on
[01:18:19.400 --> 01:18:24.480]  supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order
[01:18:24.480 --> 01:18:28.800]  anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday
[01:18:28.800 --> 01:18:34.360]  gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRegualNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.360 --> 01:18:39.560]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon,
[01:18:39.560 --> 01:18:45.320]  you use that link, and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to
[01:18:45.320 --> 01:18:51.000]  do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow,
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:56.280]  giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. Thank you so
[01:18:56.280 --> 01:19:11.120]  much. We are welcome. Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:26.280 --> 01:19:41.960]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Souton, Ruella Radio, and we're talking
[01:19:41.960 --> 01:19:49.360]  to Irvin and Nevada. Okay, you have one more question? Yeah, when I went down and
[01:19:49.360 --> 01:19:58.720]  got that thing, I also got a notice that Lean filed at the end of last year, notice
[01:19:58.720 --> 01:20:05.440]  of, by the water company. They had done that once before, and it was paid off by the
[01:20:05.440 --> 01:20:08.480]  services I didn't care, but I'm not going to go that route this again. Anyway, it's
[01:20:08.480 --> 01:20:14.800]  signed by Winston Ward, customer care supervisor, and customer care. He's too
[01:20:14.800 --> 01:20:19.600]  cheap to spring for a lawyer, so this is a notice of Lean, which I found, finally,
[01:20:19.600 --> 01:20:26.480]  the hard way, that notice of Lean is not the same thing as a Lean. That kind of
[01:20:26.480 --> 01:20:31.800]  thing, you think that the county is culpable too, as well as Brett, to send
[01:20:31.800 --> 01:20:36.880]  something to the head of the county recorders office, as well as Mr. Ward,
[01:20:36.880 --> 01:20:42.680]  the customer care supervisor. We're filing, as I said, notice of Lean when
[01:20:42.680 --> 01:20:48.080]  there's a, how far it's like to say, what happened to my trial and a judgment
[01:20:48.080 --> 01:20:51.000]  being rented by a court. You just say, well, we just make a believe, and we were
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:55.360]  about to pass that pesky little step. Oh, did you have some thoughts on that?
[01:20:55.360 --> 01:21:00.800]  They sent that thing to you, by the way, Randy. Okay, I was waiting to see if you're
[01:21:00.800 --> 01:21:09.760]  talking to Brett or me. Yeah. This is probably in statute that they can file
[01:21:09.760 --> 01:21:17.440]  this, Lean. I can't imagine a governmental entity filing a Lean without
[01:21:17.440 --> 01:21:23.520]  some statutory authorization to do so. It has here, but, you know, codes and
[01:21:23.520 --> 01:21:27.840]  statutes come in law. They, in theory, don't apply to us, but they had the thing
[01:21:27.840 --> 01:21:33.600]  right here against the filing property in Nevada. So, that seems to violate the
[01:21:33.600 --> 01:21:41.080]  7th matter. I mean, the contracts are about $20 bucks, given that they're
[01:21:41.080 --> 01:21:46.600]  filed by jury. Well, I'm not sure. You don't always have to have a trial to
[01:21:46.600 --> 01:21:54.040]  file a Lean. Let's say you contract with me to work on your property and you
[01:21:54.040 --> 01:22:00.320]  don't pay me. I can file a Mechanics or a Materials Lean, and I don't have to go
[01:22:00.320 --> 01:22:05.840]  to court for that. If you object to the Lean, you can file an opposition in the
[01:22:05.840 --> 01:22:11.360]  record, and then they would have to go to court to enforce the Lean. Yeah, I mean,
[01:22:11.360 --> 01:22:19.240]  I did the thing. It's the overall thing is the UCC 9-210, but it's
[01:22:19.240 --> 01:22:22.960]  codified in my state. It has a very similar number. I mean, I'd read that the UCC
[01:22:22.960 --> 01:22:26.080]  isn't really beholding to anybody, so you have to get the one through your state,
[01:22:26.080 --> 01:22:30.880]  in which it's a statement of account saying, you're saying on the penalty
[01:22:30.880 --> 01:22:38.000]  of perjury that the balance is X, in this case, zero, and they have 14 days from
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:45.640]  a seat to say also on the penalty of perjury, just shoot it. And it has to be,
[01:22:45.640 --> 01:22:50.360]  you know, with a court of officers, not to drill in the mailroom, and they never
[01:22:50.360 --> 01:22:55.600]  seem to do that for some strange reason. So, that's the bone of
[01:22:55.600 --> 01:22:59.160]  contention there, until they just, I'm still aware, we can ignore that and then
[01:22:59.160 --> 01:23:08.920]  file the notice of Lean. So, what do you think about this filing a notice of when
[01:23:08.920 --> 01:23:16.880]  what they would be potentially authorized to do by a statute or something
[01:23:16.880 --> 01:23:23.120]  is to file the Lean itself, and they put the notice of Lean in there instead of
[01:23:23.120 --> 01:23:32.800]  the Lean. No, that goes to the nature of Lean. It's not the filing in the record
[01:23:32.800 --> 01:23:43.240]  that creates the Lean. It's a debt. If you hire me to work on your property,
[01:23:43.240 --> 01:23:50.320]  and you don't pay me, the failure to pay me creates the Lean. And I file a notice
[01:23:50.320 --> 01:23:58.760]  that the Lean has been created. It's not created when you file in the record. It's
[01:23:58.760 --> 01:24:04.560]  created when the circumstances occur. Yeah, but when you dispute it, does not have
[01:24:04.560 --> 01:24:11.520]  any impact? Wait, you're talking a little faster than I can listen. Oh, sorry. Get
[01:24:11.520 --> 01:24:15.280]  back away from the mic a little bit, you're distorting someone. Oh, he said
[01:24:15.280 --> 01:24:22.680]  when you dispute that, doesn't it have any impact? No, yes. Once you dispute the
[01:24:22.680 --> 01:24:28.520]  Lean, then the Lean's unenforceable until it's proven up. The other side who
[01:24:28.520 --> 01:24:33.760]  filed a notice of Lean would then have to go to a court and get a court order
[01:24:33.760 --> 01:24:41.800]  validating the Lean. Exactly the one, though. Well, that was my stance, so that's
[01:24:41.800 --> 01:24:48.320]  why I thought that was. Yeah, if nobody, you know, 90% of the Lean's filed in the
[01:24:48.320 --> 01:24:55.200]  record, the homeowner has no clue. Nobody goes down and checks those records. So
[01:24:55.200 --> 01:24:59.440]  they file these in there, and nobody raises an opposition to them. And
[01:24:59.440 --> 01:25:05.400]  generally, most states, once a document is filed in the county recorder's office,
[01:25:05.400 --> 01:25:10.480]  it must be, if someone has a challenge, they must bring that challenge within
[01:25:10.480 --> 01:25:17.120]  four years for most states. I think New York is six years. But after that time,
[01:25:17.120 --> 01:25:23.800]  the document becomes regular by the passage of time, and it can no longer be
[01:25:23.800 --> 01:25:30.280]  challenged. So they file these Leans, and nobody notices it. They don't try to
[01:25:30.280 --> 01:25:34.600]  collect them until the house sells. And when the house sells, all these Leans
[01:25:34.600 --> 01:25:45.440]  pop up. And by then, for the most part, it's too late. Yeah, right. Okay, all right.
[01:25:45.440 --> 01:25:52.120]  Well, as always, thanks for your input and opinion. I appreciate it. And, oh, my last
[01:25:52.120 --> 01:25:59.240]  thing is I got out the criminal complaint to the special agent, the FDI, and it
[01:25:59.240 --> 01:26:04.360]  took me insurance, so Paul's in his court. I think yesterday's the loop. It's going to be very
[01:26:04.360 --> 01:26:07.600]  interesting to see. And, you know, I mentioned, I said, I've sent things to
[01:26:07.600 --> 01:26:12.840]  your office before, and didn't even get the courtesy of a reply. I implore you to
[01:26:12.840 --> 01:26:21.400]  honor your oath. I hope he does. I hope he doesn't, so you can
[01:26:21.400 --> 01:26:34.360]  stay in good. Okay, guys. Okay, thank you. Now we're going to this looks like a
[01:26:34.360 --> 01:26:43.440]  first time caller. No, we just dropped off again. Oh, yeah, yeah, just dropped off
[01:26:43.440 --> 01:26:51.160]  again. We have one caller that every time a caller drops off, this call drops off.
[01:26:51.160 --> 01:26:59.040]  Okay, just got back in. This is Christine in California. Okay, this time our
[01:26:59.040 --> 01:27:04.200]  database actually found her. Oh, hello, Christine. You must have been calling in
[01:27:04.200 --> 01:27:12.040]  from a different number. I've been calling over and over. Yeah, we tried to go to you
[01:27:12.040 --> 01:27:17.480]  and boom, you dropped right off. Yeah. You just dropped again and then came right
[01:27:17.480 --> 01:27:23.880]  back. Okay. What do you have for us today? You're in the 408 area code. I've got Ted
[01:27:23.880 --> 01:27:30.960]  right after you. Excuse me, and he's also in 408. You guys must be neighbors.
[01:27:30.960 --> 01:27:37.760]  He's actually helping me with the case if you want to connect him as well. Oh, okay.
[01:27:37.760 --> 01:27:45.880]  Good. Hold on. Let me bring him in. Hello, Ted. Okay. Hey, Randy, we'll pause the
[01:27:45.880 --> 01:27:54.520]  second while you take that shot. Okay, Christine, what do you have for us?
[01:27:54.520 --> 01:28:00.720]  So, my home was foreclosed on a fighting eviction. Like I said, Ted is helping me
[01:28:00.720 --> 01:28:05.160]  but they gave us and sold the house and dismissed it their eviction case against
[01:28:05.160 --> 01:28:09.640]  me. And supposedly, they sold the house to a third party which actually turned out to
[01:28:09.640 --> 01:28:18.200]  be a real estate broker. He filed a new eviction that I'm now fighting. Okay. How much did
[01:28:18.200 --> 01:28:27.680]  the house sell for? 1.3, I believe, is what he is saying.
[01:28:27.680 --> 01:28:35.920]  What was fair market value for the house? Well, they're going for that amount in the
[01:28:35.920 --> 01:28:40.360]  area but the house is not in the condition for that price.
[01:28:40.360 --> 01:28:49.360]  Okay. Do you have an estimate on what it would take to bring it up to fair market value?
[01:28:49.360 --> 01:28:57.400]  What I'm trying to do is calculate current value of the property and then I want to find
[01:28:57.400 --> 01:29:03.800]  out how much the bank claimed against it. And if it's sold for more than was claimed
[01:29:03.800 --> 01:29:10.920]  against it, did they, the bank deposit with the treasure of the overages?
[01:29:10.920 --> 01:29:25.000]  No. Okay. We need these numbers to be able to calculate that part. Let me come back.
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:36.240]  Give me a brief idea of the nature of this foreclosure and I've fought California before
[01:29:36.240 --> 01:29:41.360]  and I can give you some idea of how to handle these guys. Hang on. I was just stalling because
[01:29:41.360 --> 01:29:46.360]  we were running out of time here and I didn't want to run over the edge. And then I wound
[01:29:46.360 --> 01:30:01.520]  up going out too soon screwing everything up today. Okay. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:30:01.520 --> 01:30:06.800]  The top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. If you build an electrical smart
[01:30:06.800 --> 01:30:12.400]  grid, the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic blackout. I'm Dr. Katherine
[01:30:12.400 --> 01:30:16.320]  Albrecht back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:16.320 --> 01:30:20.840]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:30:20.840 --> 01:30:26.640]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.640 --> 01:30:32.880]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:32.880 --> 01:30:37.960]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private
[01:30:37.960 --> 01:30:45.880]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Start Page.
[01:30:45.880 --> 01:30:49.840]  Governments love power so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into
[01:30:49.840 --> 01:30:54.960]  your home too with a smart grid. So they're installing a national network of smart meters
[01:30:54.960 --> 01:30:59.400]  to remotely monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[01:30:59.400 --> 01:31:04.720]  But cybersecurity expert David Choch says not so fast if we make the national power grid
[01:31:04.720 --> 01:31:09.760]  controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day. Working remotely, they could
[01:31:09.760 --> 01:31:15.960]  tap in and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable to our enemies. I've long opposed
[01:31:15.960 --> 01:31:21.440]  smart meters for privacy and health reasons. The catastrophic failures caused by hackers?
[01:31:21.440 --> 01:31:27.360]  There's nothing smart about that. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most
[01:31:27.360 --> 01:31:31.440]  private search engine.
[01:31:31.440 --> 01:31:36.760]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.760 --> 01:31:41.520]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have
[01:31:41.520 --> 01:31:45.800]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have
[01:31:45.800 --> 01:31:50.440]  given their lives. Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy
[01:31:50.440 --> 01:31:53.880]  theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correctional. I'm an Air Force
[01:31:53.880 --> 01:31:58.880]  pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to
[01:31:58.880 --> 01:32:01.880]  RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.880 --> 01:32:06.880]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[01:32:06.880 --> 01:32:09.880]  we live in and us against them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a
[01:32:09.880 --> 01:32:14.160]  free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights
[01:32:14.160 --> 01:32:17.400]  are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private
[01:32:17.400 --> 01:32:21.360]  capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford
[01:32:21.360 --> 01:32:25.240]  us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through
[01:32:25.240 --> 01:32:29.320]  due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy, Katie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.320 --> 01:32:32.920]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand
[01:32:32.920 --> 01:32:36.960]  what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy
[01:32:36.960 --> 01:32:41.800]  of this valuable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering
[01:32:41.800 --> 01:32:45.400]  now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, A Law Versus
[01:32:45.400 --> 01:32:49.720]  the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents
[01:32:49.720 --> 01:32:53.040]  and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help
[01:32:53.040 --> 01:32:57.480]  of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have
[01:32:57.480 --> 01:33:08.480]  a free society we all want and deserve. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:33:08.480 --> 01:33:37.480]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, thank you.
[01:33:37.480 --> 01:33:49.520]  Rule of Law Radio and we are talking to Christine and Ted in California. Okay, what kind of
[01:33:49.520 --> 01:33:54.480]  okay, what was the question you had for us before I go into other stuff?
[01:33:54.480 --> 01:34:02.280]  Well, where I'm going with this is we filed paperwork. All the people that I've ever filed
[01:34:02.280 --> 01:34:08.160]  kept saying that I don't consent to a commissioner or a judge pro temp. They kept continuing
[01:34:08.160 --> 01:34:15.200]  to put a commissioner before me who kept trying to coerce me to use him instead of a judge
[01:34:15.200 --> 01:34:20.720]  and I kept saying no. Well, through the process, they ignored everything that I've asked and
[01:34:20.720 --> 01:34:30.520]  they gave me... Okay, hold on, hold on. Was this... How are you in court in a foreclosure
[01:34:30.520 --> 01:34:34.400]  case? Did you file a wrongful foreclosure suit?
[01:34:34.400 --> 01:34:39.800]  I did, but they let all of the other side, the bank's off one of them because of the
[01:34:39.800 --> 01:34:46.400]  name error. They let them off. They let everyone else off. I've never got a fair trial. I'm
[01:34:46.400 --> 01:34:51.520]  in appeals right now with that. But in the meantime, the bank that had originally purchased
[01:34:51.520 --> 01:35:01.000]  the property off the foreclosure did an eviction, but then later got out of... They ended up
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:08.920]  selling the property while it was in litigation. And now I'm in a new eviction with the real
[01:35:08.920 --> 01:35:16.680]  estate broker who supposedly purchased it. And everything just keeps continuing to be
[01:35:16.680 --> 01:35:24.680]  ignored and they ended up giving them the writ of possession while I'm being trying
[01:35:24.680 --> 01:35:32.880]  to fight my case because I won't be a commissioner, but the commissioner turned around and gave
[01:35:32.880 --> 01:35:34.960]  them the writ of possession.
[01:35:34.960 --> 01:35:37.400]  Why won't you see a commissioner?
[01:35:37.400 --> 01:35:48.040]  Because I want a judge that knows eviction. Does... Okay, you realize you're in California
[01:35:48.040 --> 01:35:55.920]  and Ted can tell you... I've come to the conclusion that California is by far the most corrupt
[01:35:55.920 --> 01:36:03.480]  state and nation, the California courts. Absolutely. Make no difference what you put
[01:36:03.480 --> 01:36:13.880]  in front of them. They have been bought and paid for. There is a way to beat them, but
[01:36:13.880 --> 01:36:18.080]  expecting to win in court is not one of them.
[01:36:18.080 --> 01:36:21.080]  Thank you.
[01:36:21.080 --> 01:36:31.440]  Ted, you can verify what I'm saying. We go after them politically. Have you sued any
[01:36:31.440 --> 01:36:34.160]  of the actors in this case?
[01:36:34.160 --> 01:36:38.360]  No, that's what we're thinking to do now.
[01:36:38.360 --> 01:36:41.960]  Have you filed any bar grievances?
[01:36:41.960 --> 01:36:42.960]  No.
[01:36:42.960 --> 01:36:55.640]  We're just starting that, Randy, because pretty much what Christina told you is... I'm trying
[01:36:55.640 --> 01:37:02.400]  to chunk this down a little bit more, Randy, but here's the thing. I have an eviction lawyer
[01:37:02.400 --> 01:37:07.800]  helping Christine and I was kind of on the sidelines. I just came back from another trip
[01:37:07.800 --> 01:37:14.200]  up to my mom's yesterday. The thing right now, it just hit me today because I told her
[01:37:14.200 --> 01:37:19.160]  to call into the show that we need to now put a criminal complaint against that commissioner
[01:37:19.160 --> 01:37:24.400]  because the commissioner did not have authority to hold the hearing.
[01:37:24.400 --> 01:37:33.040]  Like you just said, Randy, they're not even following the eviction law. There was one
[01:37:33.040 --> 01:37:41.760]  appeal that went up and they denied it, but now there's new issues. The bottom line is
[01:37:41.760 --> 01:37:51.360]  she's never been served. The first thing that was filed was a demur or a set aside the claim
[01:37:51.360 --> 01:37:57.640]  of service. That's where they just... Like you say, Randy, they're just ignoring everything.
[01:37:57.640 --> 01:38:03.000]  They're just acting as if she came into the case, which she did not. She's appeared by
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:09.760]  phone. She's never been served. This broker is an Easterner kind of guy. One of the first
[01:38:09.760 --> 01:38:14.080]  things he did is he went out and tried to tow her car off the street out in front of
[01:38:14.080 --> 01:38:18.360]  the house that was legally parked on a city street. Then the next thing he did, he started
[01:38:18.360 --> 01:38:23.560]  harassing her in text messages and I told Christine, just keep everything documented.
[01:38:23.560 --> 01:38:26.440]  I said, he's going to make one or two more mistakes and you're going to end up with the
[01:38:26.440 --> 01:38:32.320]  house because there's no self-help. What we have here in California now, like you said,
[01:38:32.320 --> 01:38:38.400]  the judges are bought and paid for, the self-help is happening from the bench. Okay, they're
[01:38:38.400 --> 01:38:42.880]  not following the eviction law. The papers are all screwed up. They don't have her name
[01:38:42.880 --> 01:38:52.160]  spelled right. They have put on their cover sheet that this is a commercial, not a residential.
[01:38:52.160 --> 01:38:58.680]  There's litany of mistakes and if things are being put to them in demerits or to set aside
[01:38:58.680 --> 01:39:09.400]  and such, they can frame it all. You know it's very important to follow the law of eviction
[01:39:09.400 --> 01:39:15.120]  because it is already an expedited process and there's very little due process for the
[01:39:15.120 --> 01:39:20.360]  one that's being evicted. Now we're at the point here where we have total lawlessness
[01:39:20.360 --> 01:39:26.640]  in the court in this case. We're going back in on Monday. I don't know. The lawyer wrote
[01:39:26.640 --> 01:39:34.560]  another motion, something maybe to set aside or pull back the writ of possession. But as
[01:39:34.560 --> 01:39:40.880]  it says, she got posted of writ of possession last week while I was out of town and the
[01:39:40.880 --> 01:39:46.320]  eviction date is now this coming Wednesday. Right now my thing is to file a criminal complaint
[01:39:46.320 --> 01:39:49.640]  against the commissioner for violating the law.
[01:39:49.640 --> 01:39:56.440]  Okay, hold on. Did you file an appeal on the writ of possession?
[01:39:56.440 --> 01:40:01.280]  I believe that's what's going on again because like I said, Brandy, we do have an eviction
[01:40:01.280 --> 01:40:07.320]  lawyer with a paralegal. The paralegal is doing most of the work and I'm trying to come
[01:40:07.320 --> 01:40:12.760]  up to speed on these latest turn of events because I thought this was under control.
[01:40:12.760 --> 01:40:20.400]  Okay. If you have a lawyer on the one hand, then start bar-grieving the lawyers on the
[01:40:20.400 --> 01:40:29.840]  other side and criminal complaints where you can, trying to tow your car that was legally
[01:40:29.840 --> 01:40:40.000]  parked, that should get criminal. Arrestment, all of those should get criminal and let the
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:46.120]  local officials refuse to do their job and then you go after the local officials and
[01:40:46.120 --> 01:40:50.840]  get the local officials, P.O.'s at the guy because they're trying to help him out, create
[01:40:50.840 --> 01:40:56.840]  a little politics. And when your lawyer comes to you and say, oh, you've got to stop doing
[01:40:56.840 --> 01:41:02.920]  this, you tell the lawyer, there's none of your business. You got out of this business
[01:41:02.920 --> 01:41:08.400]  and then he can go back and tell the judge, sorry, Your Honor, I don't have any control
[01:41:08.400 --> 01:41:15.040]  over my client. And the judge has no control over you. He does have control over the lawyers,
[01:41:15.040 --> 01:41:23.640]  but if you won't let your lawyer throw you under the bus, then your lawyer can go back
[01:41:23.640 --> 01:41:31.520]  to the judge and use his relationship with the judge to help you to keep you from hammering
[01:41:31.520 --> 01:41:37.360]  him. I'm probably not making much sense here, but I don't have much time here at the end
[01:41:37.360 --> 01:41:43.840]  of the show to explain how we handle lawyers. Your lawyer is not going to do anything to
[01:41:43.840 --> 01:41:51.760]  annoy the judge because if he does, then the judge is likely to screw his next client to
[01:41:51.760 --> 01:41:59.480]  get back at him. So lawyers are real careful about what they do in the court.
[01:41:59.480 --> 01:42:07.800]  This is basically pro-state because this lawyer operates a website and so he basically operates
[01:42:07.800 --> 01:42:14.920]  like a paralegal. Christine is representing himself before the court, so that's a different
[01:42:14.920 --> 01:42:15.920]  situation.
[01:42:15.920 --> 01:42:22.440]  Okay, hold on, hold on. Is the lawyer the lawyer of record in the case?
[01:42:22.440 --> 01:42:23.440]  No.
[01:42:23.440 --> 01:42:30.320]  Oh, okay, then good. This is Margarita Crippola out of the other side. The judge has no power
[01:42:30.320 --> 01:42:38.640]  over you whatsoever directly. He has no influence. If you file a bar grievance against the lawyers
[01:42:38.640 --> 01:42:43.880]  on the other side and the judge says anything to you about it, you file a bar grievance
[01:42:43.880 --> 01:42:49.440]  against the other side for telling the judge about it and then you're asked for sanctions.
[01:42:49.440 --> 01:42:57.280]  You become the pro-state from hell. You don't need the judge to be your buddy. You don't
[01:42:57.280 --> 01:43:03.800]  need him to like you. You're probably better off if he doesn't. If you're hammering these
[01:43:03.800 --> 01:43:09.600]  lawyers like crazy, if the judge says anything about it, you file a judicial conduct complaint
[01:43:09.600 --> 01:43:19.240]  against the judge. You want to give them a reason to make this go away. As long as you
[01:43:19.240 --> 01:43:26.360]  play nice with them, they will screw you big time. Hang on, we're about to go to our sponsors.
[01:43:26.360 --> 01:43:34.120]  I'll explain this as best I can in the time I have. I've helped over 700 people file federal
[01:43:34.120 --> 01:43:42.200]  lawsuits on foreclosure issues, so I've got lots of things. I can give you a better idea
[01:43:42.200 --> 01:43:48.120]  if I could see what you have filed and what issues are before the court. Hang on, go into
[01:43:48.120 --> 01:44:00.600]  our sponsors. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.600 --> 01:44:05.200]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:44:05.200 --> 01:44:09.920]  of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we
[01:44:09.920 --> 01:44:16.040]  changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[01:44:16.040 --> 01:44:21.480]  is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and
[01:44:21.480 --> 01:44:27.880]  mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logo's radio network gets many requests
[01:44:27.880 --> 01:44:33.240]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity
[01:44:33.240 --> 01:44:39.120]  so much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many
[01:44:39.120 --> 01:44:46.000]  others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:51.960]  quality radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.960 --> 01:44:57.200]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:44:57.200 --> 01:45:02.200]  increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:02.200 --> 01:45:09.760]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:09.760 --> 01:45:16.280]  The affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:45:16.280 --> 01:45:21.920]  step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't
[01:45:21.920 --> 01:45:27.400]  have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step
[01:45:27.400 --> 01:45:34.000]  course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.800]  years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone
[01:45:39.800 --> 01:45:45.760]  should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:45.760 --> 01:45:53.400]  We'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics,
[01:45:53.400 --> 01:45:59.640]  and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner. Or call toll-free
[01:45:59.640 --> 01:46:25.640]  866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:29.640 --> 01:46:58.920]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio.
[01:46:58.920 --> 01:47:08.720]  Well, Ted, this is going to be way too complex to do in one segment. Can you call me tomorrow
[01:47:08.720 --> 01:47:16.320]  and conference in Christine? I know you're wanting to help, or my concern is, is your
[01:47:16.320 --> 01:47:22.520]  background in foreclosure issues may not be enough at this late point in the game. So
[01:47:22.520 --> 01:47:32.320]  if you were, can you call me tomorrow? Hold on, let me, I forgot to unmute you. Okay, can
[01:47:32.320 --> 01:47:37.920]  you do a conference call tomorrow? And in the meantime, you may email me the documents
[01:47:37.920 --> 01:47:49.960]  that's been filed in the case. Yes, sir. Okay, let me ask one thing. Is the documents, name
[01:47:49.960 --> 01:47:59.600]  the documents with your last name, the year of the document in four digits, dash, month
[01:47:59.600 --> 01:48:06.400]  of the document in two digits, dash, day in two digits, and then what the document is.
[01:48:06.400 --> 01:48:12.560]  If you name them that way, they will organize themselves in chronological order, and that
[01:48:12.560 --> 01:48:20.160]  will dramatically improve my ability to go through this quickly and give you an analysis.
[01:48:20.160 --> 01:48:30.960]  Okay, and Randy, real quick, on my case where I, at the Ninth Circuit, I put in the letter,
[01:48:30.960 --> 01:48:39.800]  our paper regarding not being frivolous, which I read on the radio. I just got word today
[01:48:39.800 --> 01:48:47.440]  that the county lawyer has filed a rebuttal to that on behalf of the deputy district attorney
[01:48:47.440 --> 01:48:53.760]  that that suits about. And of course, the suits all about no warrant, a warrantless arrest
[01:48:53.760 --> 01:49:00.040]  and the writer of view. So that's pretty interesting that they're, that's kind of, to me, it's kind
[01:49:00.040 --> 01:49:13.920]  of an admission that they got a problem. Good. And I expect still the night to dismiss it,
[01:49:13.920 --> 01:49:24.360]  but my intention is to go right to the Supreme Court. Okay, good. I have a first time caller
[01:49:24.360 --> 01:49:31.360]  would like to get to, can we do a call tomorrow and we'll talk about this tomorrow? Yes, sir.
[01:49:31.360 --> 01:49:38.400]  Okay, just let me know what time and I'll make myself available. You tell me what time,
[01:49:38.400 --> 01:49:44.160]  your time is more important than mine. Well, earlier is better for me than late, earlier
[01:49:44.160 --> 01:49:55.160]  in the day. So eight or nine or 10 o'clock your time. Okay, that'll be six or seven my
[01:49:55.160 --> 01:50:00.120]  time. Well, we're, we're not, we're further out than you. So if I call you at nine a.m.,
[01:50:00.120 --> 01:50:07.640]  you're already tell me what time, your time you want me to call eight o'clock. I'll call
[01:50:07.640 --> 01:50:18.480]  you eight a.m. Texas time. Yes. Okay. Okay, thank you. Thank you. Okay, now we're going
[01:50:18.480 --> 01:50:24.040]  to go to Barbara in New Mexico. We've been trying to go to you all night, Barbara, when
[01:50:24.040 --> 01:50:34.480]  you keep dropping off. Okay, what do you have for us today? Oh, how are you? Oh, regarding
[01:50:34.480 --> 01:50:43.720]  the mask law that is still in effect for the people, you know, with COVID. Hold on. Can
[01:50:43.720 --> 01:50:50.040]  you move the mic away from your mouth a little bit or down by your chin? It's, it's distorting.
[01:50:50.040 --> 01:50:58.080]  Oh, is that better? No, not much. It may just be the connection. Okay, go ahead. I will.
[01:50:58.080 --> 01:51:09.760]  That I've heard on a podcast of someone referencing you of late that you had sued your governor
[01:51:09.760 --> 01:51:21.160]  to, you know, stop the requirement for masks because it's illegal and that your state attorney
[01:51:21.160 --> 01:51:26.920]  general was of a different party. Yeah, I think the Democrats, so he was happy to sue
[01:51:26.920 --> 01:51:33.400]  you. Let me, let me address that quickly. I filed a hundred and fifty one page criminal
[01:51:33.400 --> 01:51:40.000]  complaint against the governor with the district attorney. The district, the district attorney
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:51.920]  happened to have just lost the, the primary election. So she was not eligible to run for,
[01:51:51.920 --> 01:51:57.760]  for election again. So she was lame duck. She was a Democrat. The governor is a Republican
[01:51:57.760 --> 01:52:07.480]  with the week that she gave the complaints to the grand jury, the governor overturned
[01:52:07.480 --> 01:52:14.840]  all of his executive orders. I don't know that he overturned them because of the likelihood
[01:52:14.840 --> 01:52:25.720]  of indictment, but I'd like to think that's the reason. This person on who agrees with,
[01:52:25.720 --> 01:52:32.760]  you know, not having masks due to health or public health that we've been made by the
[01:52:32.760 --> 01:52:46.000]  creator and that we need to breathe, that the insurance companies have told the governors
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:50.280]  of your state and Florida, for example, that it is illegal and that they don't want to
[01:52:50.280 --> 01:52:59.360]  pay out any more cases of people, citizens suing. And that's why, because the insurance
[01:52:59.360 --> 01:53:05.240]  companies have, they'll threaten the governor saying, we won't ensure your state anymore
[01:53:05.240 --> 01:53:17.720]  because, you know, you're causing us to pay out all these cases due to your incompetency
[01:53:17.720 --> 01:53:20.040]  of misinterpreting the law.
[01:53:20.040 --> 01:53:28.800]  Well, I'm not sure what cases. Are you talking about the, where the citizens are suing the
[01:53:28.800 --> 01:53:29.800]  governors?
[01:53:29.800 --> 01:53:37.800]  No, no, she means medical cases, cases that would be an insurance payout and the insurance
[01:53:37.800 --> 01:53:42.000]  is saying, we shouldn't have to pay out. You're causing this.
[01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:43.000]  Yeah.
[01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:54.520]  That is interesting. Do you have any motions, pleadings, reports, information on that? Because
[01:53:54.520 --> 01:53:59.840]  frankly, you know, we tell everybody that you never expect to win your case and of course
[01:53:59.840 --> 01:54:04.640]  have the law and the facts on your side. You expect to win your case if you have the politics
[01:54:04.640 --> 01:54:14.160]  on your side. And this goes directly to politics. We have the insurance lobby blaming the governors
[01:54:14.160 --> 01:54:22.480]  for their losses. This is great politics. Do you have some information you can email
[01:54:22.480 --> 01:54:24.480]  me on this?
[01:54:24.480 --> 01:54:33.640]  Well, I don't have an email ability. I can just tell you that I listen to podcasts over
[01:54:33.640 --> 01:54:43.440]  phone. I have, this is though a man on his website is called I am meaning God has sent
[01:54:43.440 --> 01:54:45.440]  me to you.com.
[01:54:45.440 --> 01:54:49.680]  Wait a minute. Say that again.
[01:54:49.680 --> 01:54:56.680]  Yes, I am has sent me.
[01:54:56.680 --> 01:55:04.680]  I'm sorry. I can't understand you. I am has, has sent me.
[01:55:04.680 --> 01:55:05.680]  Yes.
[01:55:05.680 --> 01:55:11.680]  Saying I am has sent me to you.
[01:55:11.680 --> 01:55:21.680]  Yes.com. And his name is Alphonse.
[01:55:21.680 --> 01:55:26.680]  Wait a minute. Is Alphonse a Yankee from Pennsylvania?
[01:55:26.680 --> 01:55:31.680]  Oh, that's funny. Well, he does say that he's from Pennsylvania.
[01:55:31.680 --> 01:55:36.680]  I don't, okay. I know who he is.
[01:55:36.680 --> 01:55:42.680]  Is he, what, he's not all there?
[01:55:42.680 --> 01:55:45.680]  Wait, say that again.
[01:55:45.680 --> 01:55:49.680]  Is he, uh, moving his marbles?
[01:55:49.680 --> 01:55:51.680]  Who, Alphonse?
[01:55:51.680 --> 01:55:52.680]  Uh-huh.
[01:55:52.680 --> 01:55:57.680]  Well, I, I, I accuse him of that, but that's all in jest.
[01:55:57.680 --> 01:55:59.680]  Oh.
[01:55:59.680 --> 01:56:08.680]  No, he's not. He's, he does some things I don't do, but, but he follows law and he gets results.
[01:56:08.680 --> 01:56:11.680]  Hmm.
[01:56:11.680 --> 01:56:19.680]  Uh, because I was wondering myself then, if I, if I may, uh, uh, go to my, uh, what,
[01:56:19.680 --> 01:56:24.680]  then like you say it would be the district attorney, my district attorney and not my, uh,
[01:56:24.680 --> 01:56:30.680]  state attorney general to file a suit.
[01:56:30.680 --> 01:56:34.680]  No, you wouldn't file it with the state attorney general.
[01:56:34.680 --> 01:56:39.680]  If you file a suit, you file that in a district court.
[01:56:39.680 --> 01:56:47.680]  But if you're, if you're going after a governor or a high level public official,
[01:56:47.680 --> 01:56:56.680]  uh, you really need to someone who's sophisticated. It's complex.
[01:56:56.680 --> 01:57:01.680]  As a lawyer.
[01:57:01.680 --> 01:57:08.680]  What is it that you want to achieve at the end of the day?
[01:57:08.680 --> 01:57:17.680]  Um, well, my health in that time, uh, I, I'm not, um, that I wouldn't be intimidated.
[01:57:17.680 --> 01:57:25.680]  Uh, told that I have to follow, uh, uh, that I can't go into a store, a food store without a mask on.
[01:57:25.680 --> 01:57:31.680]  And I can't, uh, uh, go, go into any other store, I guess, without a mask on yet.
[01:57:31.680 --> 01:57:35.680]  The bus service, they want to have us wearing masks.
[01:57:35.680 --> 01:57:40.680]  Okay. The, the problem with private businesses,
[01:57:40.680 --> 01:57:47.680]  private business can require anything they want to your cure.
[01:57:47.680 --> 01:57:50.680]  It's not to give them your money.
[01:57:50.680 --> 01:57:58.680]  But if I have my own business and I don't want to risk this virus,
[01:57:58.680 --> 01:58:07.680]  even if all of the risks are, are not true, not real, my money, my business, my right to do that.
[01:58:07.680 --> 01:58:14.680]  Asking the government to stop them from doing that is, you know, be careful what you ask for.
[01:58:14.680 --> 01:58:17.680]  We don't want the government that deep in our business.
[01:58:17.680 --> 01:58:20.680]  I'm sorry. I am out of time.
[01:58:20.680 --> 01:58:26.680]  If you'll send me an email, we can, we can discuss this through email and maybe I can be a little more clear.
[01:58:26.680 --> 01:58:30.680]  Uh, this is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we live on radio.
[01:58:30.680 --> 01:58:32.680]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:32.680 --> 01:58:41.680]  We'll be back next week on our regular, at a regular time on Thursday and Friday at eight o'clock central.
[01:58:41.680 --> 01:58:43.680]  Give us a call next week.
[01:58:43.680 --> 01:58:49.680]  Thank you for listening. Good night.
[01:58:49.680 --> 01:58:57.680]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.680 --> 01:59:04.680]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse,
[01:59:04.680 --> 01:59:08.680]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.680 --> 01:59:11.680]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.680 --> 01:59:20.680]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.680 --> 01:59:29.680]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.680 --> 01:59:32.680]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.680 --> 01:59:40.680]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.680 --> 01:59:48.680]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.