ROL_2021-05-07_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:06.760] The following news flashes brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.760 --> 00:13.440] Markets for Monday, 22 July 2019, open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce, silver
[00:13.440 --> 00:21.440] $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.720] $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.720 --> 00:46.120] $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:46.120 --> 00:52.400] In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:57.720] on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[00:57.720 --> 01:04.720] 10 and injuring 40.
[01:04.720 --> 01:09.400] In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing hemp into
[01:09.400 --> 01:14.200] Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin,
[01:14.200 --> 01:18.040] and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:18.040 --> 01:22.240] new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:22.240 --> 01:24.680] equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:24.680 --> 01:28.400] Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:28.400 --> 01:33.000] she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.000 --> 01:34.000] law.
[01:34.000 --> 01:37.600] Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.600 --> 01:42.080] to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.080 --> 01:48.240] in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.240 --> 01:51.200] well as other cities too, like the district attorney.
[01:51.200 --> 01:56.800] In El Paso, Jaime Esparza, a Democrat, who also stated earlier this month that the law
[01:56.800 --> 02:01.720] quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.720 --> 02:06.720] However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.720 --> 02:10.720] in Harris County, who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.720 --> 02:13.440] something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.440 --> 02:17.320] It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.320 --> 02:22.560] charged with.
[02:22.560 --> 02:27.200] A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark
[02:27.200 --> 02:32.720] as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark
[02:32.720 --> 02:38.360] ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific
[02:38.360 --> 02:39.360] Ocean.
[02:39.360 --> 02:44.160] According to the University paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its
[02:44.160 --> 02:51.160] front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[03:14.160 --> 03:24.840] A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark
[03:24.840 --> 03:45.040] as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark
[03:45.040 --> 04:02.480] ever captured or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind in the Gulf of
[04:02.480 --> 04:18.520] Mexico, the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured
[04:18.520 --> 04:28.440] or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second
[04:28.440 --> 04:42.120] pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind
[04:42.120 --> 04:54.400] in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[04:54.400 --> 05:08.080] being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured
[05:08.080 --> 05:20.160] or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second
[05:20.160 --> 05:33.840] pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind
[05:33.840 --> 05:45.960] in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[05:45.960 --> 05:56.840] being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured
[05:56.840 --> 06:11.920] or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second
[06:11.920 --> 06:25.600] pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind
[06:25.600 --> 06:37.880] in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[06:37.880 --> 06:49.120] being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured
[06:49.120 --> 07:03.840] or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second
[07:03.840 --> 07:17.520] pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind
[07:17.520 --> 07:29.800] in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[07:29.800 --> 07:40.480] being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured
[07:40.480 --> 07:55.760] or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second
[07:55.760 --> 08:09.440] pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind
[08:09.440 --> 08:28.360] in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[08:28.360 --> 08:39.280] being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second pocket shark ever captured
[08:39.280 --> 08:54.000] or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the second
[08:54.000 --> 09:02.800] pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being the first of its kind
[09:02.800 --> 09:07.600] I mean, I have a friend of mine who will just say for the sake of this conversation works
[09:07.600 --> 09:15.960] in the entertainment slash hospitality industry and she is without a doubt, you know, a huge
[09:15.960 --> 09:23.040] massacre and she had a group of people come into her establishment and of course everybody
[09:23.040 --> 09:27.960] was wearing their mask and of course, you know, she had to complain to me about, you
[09:27.960 --> 09:34.320] know, the reeking smell of marijuana and all I could tell her was if that had been COVID,
[09:34.320 --> 09:37.320] you'd have been infected.
[09:37.320 --> 09:44.440] That's an excellent point.
[09:44.440 --> 09:52.320] So, you know, I'll take my odds, you know, if the survivor way was the other direction
[09:52.320 --> 09:58.480] than the 99.9% that it is, then I'd probably wear a mask and get a vaccine, but I like
[09:58.480 --> 10:04.720] my odds just the way they are and I'm not going to let them.
[10:04.720 --> 10:10.160] I mostly wanted to hear that, you know, the people to hear that when you objected to their
[10:10.160 --> 10:15.520] rules, they weren't heavy handed.
[10:15.520 --> 10:20.400] They relieved you from jury duty right away and there's a good chance that'll be the last
[10:20.400 --> 10:23.400] time you get called to jury duty.
[10:23.400 --> 10:29.280] You know, I was really prepared to go down there and have a fight on my hand, you know,
[10:29.280 --> 10:33.760] start in the instant that I walked through the door to go through security.
[10:33.760 --> 10:38.320] I really had no idea when I filled this thing out, you know, where this thing was going
[10:38.320 --> 10:39.320] to land.
[10:39.320 --> 10:46.560] So, you know, it definitely had the potential, you know, for me to be in person and having,
[10:46.560 --> 10:53.000] you know, to check in with my principles and decide, you know, where I'm willing to budge
[10:53.000 --> 10:58.600] and in my particular case, I'm not willing to budge on any of it, so you're not taking
[10:58.600 --> 11:03.920] my rights, I'm not giving them to you, and so, you know, if we're going to have to have
[11:03.920 --> 11:08.360] this fight, then I guess we'll have it, but in this particular case, apparently it's
[11:08.360 --> 11:11.640] not one that they want to have in person.
[11:11.640 --> 11:13.640] You dodged the bullet.
[11:13.640 --> 11:18.680] Well, almost, because I've been kicking around the idea of going down there and pretending
[11:18.680 --> 11:24.480] like I didn't get the email that they sent me, like it went to my fan box or something,
[11:24.480 --> 11:28.480] just to see.
[11:28.480 --> 11:35.040] I am a curious creature by nature, and this is almost impossible to resist, and, you know,
[11:35.040 --> 11:38.320] the box has been placed before me, and they opened it.
[11:38.320 --> 11:43.960] Well, we might as well run it through and see what's inside, see how deep this rabbit hole
[11:43.960 --> 11:44.960] goes.
[11:44.960 --> 11:51.960] Well, in my case, I took them on because they didn't just put the box before me, they picked
[11:51.960 --> 11:53.960] it up under my feet.
[11:53.960 --> 12:01.560] Well, that was a poor choice on their part, and I don't spend day in and day out in the
[12:01.560 --> 12:06.360] fight like you do, you know, I'm not one to go looking for a fight, but, you know, if
[12:06.360 --> 12:12.000] it happens to, you know, find its way to my mailbox or my front door or my car, or, you
[12:12.000 --> 12:17.160] know, wherever I happen to be, where it rears its head, well, then, you know, we're going
[12:17.160 --> 12:20.920] to see this thing through to the distance, so, you know.
[12:20.920 --> 12:27.480] Well, I went there looking for a fight, but not the one I found.
[12:27.480 --> 12:31.720] I was actually looking for a much more difficult fight.
[12:31.720 --> 12:36.720] They gave me an easier one than I expected.
[12:36.720 --> 12:37.720] Okay, thank you.
[12:37.720 --> 12:46.240] That's what you give me, being the most unbiased and nonjudgmental, huh, which I kicked out
[12:46.240 --> 12:47.240] of there.
[12:47.240 --> 12:48.240] Okay.
[12:48.240 --> 12:50.240] Thank you, Jason.
[12:50.240 --> 12:56.800] I wanted everybody to hear that, that you can't stand up for yourself.
[12:56.800 --> 12:58.520] And you should.
[12:58.520 --> 12:59.520] And you should.
[12:59.520 --> 13:00.520] And you should.
[13:00.520 --> 13:01.520] Okay.
[13:01.520 --> 13:02.520] Okay, Jason.
[13:02.520 --> 13:06.040] Now we're going to go to Mary in Texas.
[13:06.040 --> 13:07.040] Hello, Mary.
[13:07.040 --> 13:10.800] I'm glad to see you didn't fall asleep on us.
[13:10.800 --> 13:18.520] I fell asleep last night and woke up at 10.30 and realized I missed your show.
[13:18.520 --> 13:22.000] And I was waiting the whole show for you to call in.
[13:22.000 --> 13:26.520] Y'all still had the show without me?
[13:26.520 --> 13:27.520] We struggled through.
[13:27.520 --> 13:28.520] We managed to.
[13:28.520 --> 13:30.520] I'm sorry I missed it.
[13:30.520 --> 13:34.160] I am recording this.
[13:34.160 --> 13:41.640] I think I'm ready to put a criminal charge on an election judge in Austin this last Saturday.
[13:41.640 --> 13:54.000] We had about an eight ballot election on just different kind of little propositions.
[13:54.000 --> 13:56.160] One was including a strong mayor.
[13:56.160 --> 14:03.520] They wanted to make our mayor in Austin, like the New York mayor real, real bad idea.
[14:03.520 --> 14:05.720] Oh, it's horrible.
[14:05.720 --> 14:10.840] It's absolutely horrible that we did win on the camping van.
[14:10.840 --> 14:18.920] Our city has been taken over by violent drug addled homeless under every bridge.
[14:18.920 --> 14:21.960] And honestly, it's one reason I was glad we had snow bed.
[14:21.960 --> 14:26.680] I walked outside into the snow, my front yard in downtown Austin and said, oh, good, no
[14:26.680 --> 14:28.240] crime today.
[14:28.240 --> 14:31.080] It's that bad, folks.
[14:31.080 --> 14:32.080] It's that bad.
[14:32.080 --> 14:33.080] But we did win on that.
[14:33.080 --> 14:38.480] Now they want to set up 10 different private camps in 10 different districts in Austin.
[14:38.480 --> 14:46.360] So that's very upsetting that the governor's planning on banning homeless camping at the
[14:46.360 --> 14:47.360] state level.
[14:47.360 --> 14:51.920] But so what I did, Randy, I was at the voting polls.
[14:51.920 --> 14:58.560] I did about eight years with but rescue in Austin and we monitored a lot of the fraudulent
[14:58.560 --> 15:00.200] elections going on.
[15:00.200 --> 15:04.720] And I learned a few things from Ms. Vicki Karp and Abby and Taryn Rinnick.
[15:04.720 --> 15:11.080] A couple of them wrote a book and we were umbrellaed by Bev Harris, Black Box Voting,
[15:11.080 --> 15:13.560] who did the HBO special.
[15:13.560 --> 15:20.640] So I was up quite early and did my voting quite early, but after my little afternoon
[15:20.640 --> 15:28.640] Saturday night, I thought, why don't I check on the place where they can all the elections?
[15:28.640 --> 15:32.280] I'd already been turned away that I couldn't watch the counting.
[15:32.280 --> 15:38.800] And I have a lot of this on audio recording from phone conversation.
[15:38.800 --> 15:45.280] And so I was, unfortunately, two to three times by the judge where I went to vote in
[15:45.280 --> 15:52.560] Clarksville near my house, told, well, actually over the phone line in Travis County that
[15:52.560 --> 15:55.360] I could not watch where they count the votes.
[15:55.360 --> 16:02.800] And so I was informed by a very nice lady that the state, you know, has a law about
[16:02.800 --> 16:04.320] who can watch.
[16:04.320 --> 16:09.480] And so that has to be sanctioned by a political party or some kind of political action committee
[16:09.480 --> 16:10.480] or something.
[16:10.480 --> 16:13.160] So that's not a big deal, I guess.
[16:13.160 --> 16:16.400] I didn't know, I think that changed within the last 10 years.
[16:16.400 --> 16:23.800] So I let that one go and I just had a little tingling at the bottom of my feet to go check
[16:23.800 --> 16:29.280] out one of the polling sites near my house in Hyde Park on 39th Street.
[16:29.280 --> 16:39.080] And, of course, the judge was involved in election fraud and I have some data on that.
[16:39.080 --> 16:43.880] Okay, hang on, we're about to go to our sponsors.
[16:43.880 --> 16:53.640] We're into Kelton Brett Fountain, Rue LeVar Radio, our call-in number 512-646-1984.
[16:53.640 --> 17:00.000] We'll be taking your calls all night, we'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:05.280] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[17:05.280 --> 17:08.960] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[17:08.960 --> 17:13.120] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[17:13.120 --> 17:14.120] can win two.
[17:14.120 --> 17:18.960] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:18.960 --> 17:24.720] civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[17:24.720 --> 17:29.360] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[17:29.360 --> 17:33.560] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.560 --> 17:38.680] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.680 --> 17:40.800] Federal consultation is available as well.
[17:40.800 --> 17:46.320] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:46.320 --> 17:49.320] or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[17:49.320 --> 17:58.920] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[17:58.920 --> 17:59.920] now.
[17:59.920 --> 18:04.440] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[18:04.440 --> 18:07.920] In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we, the people, are ever
[18:07.920 --> 18:11.800] going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:11.800 --> 18:15.360] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:15.360 --> 18:19.360] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.360 --> 18:23.240] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.240 --> 18:25.120] our rights through due process.
[18:25.120 --> 18:28.600] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[18:28.600 --> 18:32.320] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.320 --> 18:34.440] is and how to hold your courts to the rule of law.
[18:34.440 --> 18:38.760] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and
[18:38.760 --> 18:40.080] ordering your copy today.
[18:40.080 --> 18:43.280] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.280 --> 18:47.080] The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[18:47.080 --> 18:50.000] Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.000 --> 18:53.960] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[18:53.960 --> 19:10.440] Order your copy today, and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:23.960 --> 19:53.920] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[19:53.920 --> 20:01.840] And we're talking to Mary in Texas, if I can get you unmuted, I hope Tina didn't drop
[20:01.840 --> 20:02.840] off.
[20:02.840 --> 20:04.840] We lost her there for a second.
[20:04.840 --> 20:11.160] Okay, you had an election judge engaged in an election fraud.
[20:11.160 --> 20:13.160] Oh, say it is.
[20:13.160 --> 20:22.440] Technically, he was hiding the hourly tally, so it's one way that we can verify the numbers
[20:22.440 --> 20:30.120] that reach the polls, and that is in Austin or in Travis County, at least the laws that
[20:30.120 --> 20:36.560] they have to present the numbers of folk that have voted per every two hours.
[20:36.560 --> 20:44.560] Now, he did present the document inside the building, but would disallowed me three times
[20:44.560 --> 20:53.240] per my request through his assistant to photo it.
[20:53.240 --> 21:00.680] Okay, he wouldn't let you photograph it, but did he actually have it showing?
[21:00.680 --> 21:02.680] He did.
[21:02.680 --> 21:08.880] Okay, then you have a turn of driver.
[21:08.880 --> 21:14.880] Are you familiar with Turner v. Driver?
[21:14.880 --> 21:16.880] No, sir.
[21:16.880 --> 21:24.080] Turner v. Driver is a case where a guy was filming the police station in Fort Worth,
[21:24.080 --> 21:25.960] and he was arrested.
[21:25.960 --> 21:32.680] Turner was doing the videotaping, drivers, the officer who arrested him, they hotboxed
[21:32.680 --> 21:38.360] him in the car for an hour, and then released him, and he sued them.
[21:38.360 --> 21:45.240] It made it to the Fifth Circuit, and the Fifth Circuit said it is axiomatic that citizens
[21:45.240 --> 21:52.920] may videotape their public officials in the performance of their duty.
[21:52.920 --> 22:02.800] So if he blocked, there had been a number of other jurisdictions that had already ruled
[22:02.800 --> 22:04.640] on this.
[22:04.640 --> 22:14.760] So if this guy blocked you from exercising your right, then see if we can't get him to
[22:14.760 --> 22:18.560] dance a little bit, let him explain his behavior to a grand jury.
[22:18.560 --> 22:23.320] Did he explain why you couldn't photograph it?
[22:23.320 --> 22:30.080] The assistant relayed to me that he said, no cameras are allowed in the building, and
[22:30.080 --> 22:34.160] I told him that's why the paper is supposed to be outward facing.
[22:34.160 --> 22:39.600] It's supposed to be easy for us to access those and not have to go around the line.
[22:39.600 --> 22:46.800] Wait, no cameras in the building would have the effect of denying a citizen in the full
[22:46.800 --> 22:49.600] and free access to her enjoyment or right.
[22:49.600 --> 22:53.840] Who decided no cameras in the building?
[22:53.840 --> 22:55.440] That was the polling place.
[22:55.440 --> 22:59.520] That's where all the polling machines were, and they should have faced the document outside.
[22:59.520 --> 23:00.520] I told her that.
[23:00.520 --> 23:05.880] She said, well, it's raining, and I said that's why the document's to be outward facing.
[23:05.880 --> 23:06.880] It was inward facing.
[23:06.880 --> 23:10.880] I had to go in through the line, act like I was cutting in front of people.
[23:10.880 --> 23:15.360] I should have been able to have gone to the door and viewed it as in the past.
[23:15.360 --> 23:25.200] Okay, so they're denying you in access to this information and denying you in more specifically
[23:25.200 --> 23:30.200] in your right to videotape your public officials in the performance of their duty.
[23:30.200 --> 23:34.080] That's when does voting become a private activity?
[23:34.080 --> 23:35.080] Exactly.
[23:35.080 --> 23:37.080] That's one of the most popular things I've ever done.
[23:37.080 --> 23:39.080] I don't know what the leather placer's done.
[23:39.080 --> 23:46.320] Well, I know what the Constitution has done, and I know what Turner Driver did.
[23:46.320 --> 23:51.560] Turner Driver said you can videotape your public officials in the performance of their duty.
[23:51.560 --> 23:57.360] It didn't say you can only videotape certain public officials.
[23:57.360 --> 24:06.840] All of them, so that's official oppression, 39.03 penal code, and it's a class A misdemeanor
[24:06.840 --> 24:10.480] in state of Texas.
[24:10.480 --> 24:15.480] That should disqualify him from working in the polling place.
[24:15.480 --> 24:18.760] It's a misdemeanor?
[24:18.760 --> 24:20.720] It's a class A misdemeanor.
[24:20.720 --> 24:21.720] Okay.
[24:21.720 --> 24:34.280] And that should get a petition for warrantal removal to the election commission.
[24:34.280 --> 24:41.200] Whoever is responsible for the polling place.
[24:41.200 --> 24:48.840] I do have an audio tape of me talking to the Travis County hotline, voting hotline, and
[24:48.840 --> 24:53.360] the lady confirmed that the complaint had been made about the same individual.
[24:53.360 --> 24:56.880] In fact, she thought I was making the...
[24:56.880 --> 24:57.880] I was calling again.
[24:57.880 --> 25:03.320] I said, no, this is my first time to complain about this.
[25:03.320 --> 25:10.160] And so I have a validation from one of the hotline ladies that said we've already taken
[25:10.160 --> 25:12.320] this complaint.
[25:12.320 --> 25:15.320] That complaint, well, you know where that will go.
[25:15.320 --> 25:19.480] But I haven't recorded, so she...
[25:19.480 --> 25:22.680] That one will go in the political trash can.
[25:22.680 --> 25:28.720] The criminal complaint won't, or it may, but when you file the criminal complaint, now you
[25:28.720 --> 25:31.320] have recourse.
[25:31.320 --> 25:37.040] Now you can bring officials to task for not going after this official.
[25:37.040 --> 25:41.400] And when you start going after prosecutors and judges for not prosecuting this guy in
[25:41.400 --> 25:48.720] the polling place, who do you think is going to get thrown under the bus?
[25:48.720 --> 25:55.440] Judge of the prosecutor or this Yokel here in the polling place?
[25:55.440 --> 25:59.120] It's all political at the end of the day.
[25:59.120 --> 26:02.120] So he's called an election judge.
[26:02.120 --> 26:03.120] He was called the judge.
[26:03.120 --> 26:05.080] I have his name and I have his assistant.
[26:05.080 --> 26:06.560] Both of their full names.
[26:06.560 --> 26:07.560] Okay.
[26:07.560 --> 26:10.880] I have a friend who's been an election judge quite often.
[26:10.880 --> 26:15.200] I'll talk to him about what authority they have and what they don't, and where to find
[26:15.200 --> 26:16.200] that authority.
[26:16.200 --> 26:23.200] But I'm sure they don't have authority to violate the First Amendment Constitution.
[26:23.200 --> 26:24.200] Okay.
[26:24.200 --> 26:30.680] Well, I would like to write that criminal complaint in a week or two.
[26:30.680 --> 26:36.520] Maybe I'll go to the state law library and see if I can find anything, because I'm particularly
[26:36.520 --> 26:42.640] interested in filing a criminal complaint on election fraud.
[26:42.640 --> 26:44.640] Those numbers are important.
[26:44.640 --> 26:57.600] I'm thinking of how to frame this as election fraud.
[26:57.600 --> 27:04.320] The fact that he didn't show the numbers to you does not necessarily indicate that there
[27:04.320 --> 27:05.320] was fraud.
[27:05.320 --> 27:12.840] Now, it would give a reasonable person of ordinary prudence, cause to believe that there was
[27:12.840 --> 27:19.200] a nefarious reason for him violating a law in order to hide these numbers, but it's not
[27:19.200 --> 27:21.280] really direct enough.
[27:21.280 --> 27:25.080] We need something a little more direct.
[27:25.080 --> 27:36.160] Criminal oppression doesn't need fraud or any other violations.
[27:36.160 --> 27:43.720] It's enough that he denies you in First Amendment right, and 39.03 says that if a public official
[27:43.720 --> 27:50.160] acting under the color or pretense of an official capacity exerts a purports to exert an authority
[27:50.160 --> 27:57.680] he does not expressly have, or fails to perform a duty he's required to perform, if he's required
[27:57.680 --> 28:05.560] to make these numbers public and publicly accessible, and he doesn't, then if he doesn't
[28:05.560 --> 28:10.560] do it fully, if he does it partially, it doesn't matter what you claim, you can claim it's
[28:10.560 --> 28:15.800] not good enough, and he can say, oh yeah, it is, well explain that to the grand jury.
[28:15.800 --> 28:23.360] I'm sure they'll be very understanding about somebody hiding our votes.
[28:23.360 --> 28:25.360] Is there my camera?
[28:25.360 --> 28:28.360] Oh, the camera's straightforward.
[28:28.360 --> 28:33.160] If I could come out there with my camera, I would have gotten arrested.
[28:33.160 --> 28:38.000] Oh, then I need to go down the next one with my camera.
[28:38.000 --> 28:45.720] I simply asked a few questions and got denied by the judge and sort of made a mental record,
[28:45.720 --> 28:50.920] made a complaint, and then thought about it and talked to you, so it's, you know, and
[28:50.920 --> 28:57.960] then I have the lady on record on audio recording saying that they have also received this complaint
[28:57.960 --> 29:04.720] from somebody else about the same judge from Travis County, also from Travis County.
[29:04.720 --> 29:08.840] I have her admitting to me on the phone they've already received the same complaint.
[29:08.840 --> 29:15.720] That needs to be in public view so we can access them and compare the tally numbers to what
[29:15.720 --> 29:17.240] comes out in the news.
[29:17.240 --> 29:23.680] Okay, who is, you know, I'm concerned about this person who's telling you there's already
[29:23.680 --> 29:25.680] a complaint.
[29:25.680 --> 29:31.640] If she's part of the system, I would have very little trust in her.
[29:31.640 --> 29:41.400] She may be telling everybody that to keep anybody from file lodging the complaint.
[29:41.400 --> 29:47.000] You probably won't believe this, Mary, but these public officials will lie to you.
[29:47.000 --> 29:48.000] Hang around.
[29:48.000 --> 30:02.480] If you've owned our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, we'll be
[30:02.480 --> 30:03.480] right back.
[30:03.480 --> 30:06.000] It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively
[30:06.000 --> 30:07.000] affected our health?
[30:07.000 --> 30:11.160] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how
[30:11.160 --> 30:15.480] cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:15.480 --> 30:17.080] Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.080 --> 30:20.680] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.680 --> 30:25.480] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.480 --> 30:30.480] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.480 --> 30:33.200] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.200 --> 30:37.520] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.520 --> 30:41.040] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.040 --> 30:43.320] Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.320 --> 30:49.120] Cell phones emit radio frequency energy, it's a fact, but whether it's dangerous to have
[30:49.120 --> 30:52.480] a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed.
[30:52.480 --> 30:56.880] Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[30:56.880 --> 31:01.440] Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones
[31:01.440 --> 31:02.440] affect brain chemistry.
[31:02.440 --> 31:08.040] A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest
[31:08.040 --> 31:11.720] to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:11.720 --> 31:15.680] While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any
[31:15.680 --> 31:16.680] chances.
[31:16.680 --> 31:20.320] I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[31:20.320 --> 31:30.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.400 --> 31:31.400] I lost my son.
[31:31.400 --> 31:32.400] My nephew.
[31:32.400 --> 31:33.400] My uncle.
[31:33.400 --> 31:34.400] My son.
[31:34.400 --> 31:35.400] On September 11th, 2004.
[31:35.400 --> 31:38.640] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[31:38.640 --> 31:42.880] Real Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:42.880 --> 31:48.640] While the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7, over 1,200 architects
[31:48.640 --> 31:52.400] and engineers has looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[31:52.400 --> 31:53.880] Bring justice to my son.
[31:53.880 --> 31:54.880] My uncle.
[31:54.880 --> 31:55.880] My nephew.
[31:55.880 --> 31:56.880] My son.
[31:56.880 --> 31:57.880] Go to building what.org.
[31:57.880 --> 32:01.120] Why it's felt, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.120 --> 32:05.760] Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[32:05.760 --> 32:12.040] Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th, from 8 to 10 p.m. central time.
[32:12.040 --> 32:15.120] Our goal is in accord with Matthew 5.16.
[32:15.120 --> 32:20.160] Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father
[32:20.160 --> 32:21.720] which is in heaven.
[32:21.720 --> 32:26.840] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:26.840 --> 32:32.080] Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed
[32:32.080 --> 32:35.200] to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:35.200 --> 32:39.600] Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss
[32:39.600 --> 32:41.360] one chapter per week.
[32:41.360 --> 32:46.440] Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as
[32:46.440 --> 32:48.640] Christian character development.
[32:48.640 --> 32:55.720] So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting
[32:55.720 --> 33:00.680] January 8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[33:00.680 --> 33:15.520] You're listening to the LogosRadio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com Yeah, I got the
[33:15.520 --> 33:25.960] warrant and I'm going to solve them, to the end of them, prosecute them, okay.
[33:25.960 --> 33:33.600] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruevall Radio and we're talking to Mary and
[33:33.600 --> 33:34.600] Austin.
[33:34.600 --> 33:44.160] Okay, simple enough to file a criminal complaint, but we keep in mind everything's political.
[33:44.160 --> 33:50.800] And if this guy's an election judge, he has to be appointed.
[33:50.800 --> 33:58.080] And if you move for quote-warned-toe removal, that will probably ensure that he never gets
[33:58.080 --> 34:01.640] appointed as an election judge again.
[34:01.640 --> 34:11.920] It occurs to me that you also have the canons of judicial conduct.
[34:11.920 --> 34:19.600] Canon 2A is speaking to avoiding impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all the
[34:19.600 --> 34:25.080] judge's activities and it says, a judge shall comply with the law and should act at all
[34:25.080 --> 34:32.920] times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
[34:32.920 --> 34:36.680] Okay, wait a minute, Brett, this is an election judge.
[34:36.680 --> 34:37.680] That's different.
[34:37.680 --> 34:38.680] Yeah.
[34:38.680 --> 34:44.520] He is just, he's not a judicial officer in any, in any body, in an oath.
[34:44.520 --> 34:50.120] Now, anybody can be appointed, well, he may have taken an oath, but anybody can be appointed
[34:50.120 --> 34:56.160] as an election judge, he probably won't fall under those canons, but he certainly falls
[34:56.160 --> 34:57.840] under the penal code.
[34:57.840 --> 35:00.840] Now, Ken Magnuson was an election judge.
[35:00.840 --> 35:05.480] You just go down and if they need one, they'll appoint you.
[35:05.480 --> 35:12.560] I saw one over in Upshire County and they just brought in the county judge for that.
[35:12.560 --> 35:18.160] But yeah, normally they're not there, nor are you just ordinary people.
[35:18.160 --> 35:19.160] Okay.
[35:19.160 --> 35:24.240] Well, some of them are not so ordinary, Ken wasn't terribly ordinary, but I'll talk to
[35:24.240 --> 35:25.240] him about this.
[35:25.240 --> 35:32.000] He will understand the requirements of an election judge, what they can do, what they
[35:32.000 --> 35:33.240] can't do.
[35:33.240 --> 35:37.640] Well, the penal code is going to be excellent.
[35:37.640 --> 35:44.360] This really interrupts a lot of the stalemate we've gotten from judge lawyers and all this
[35:44.360 --> 35:50.760] other stuff dealing with election fraud over the years.
[35:50.760 --> 35:56.480] This is really what I'm, you know, your technique is pretty brutal, but it apparently is the
[35:56.480 --> 35:59.040] only one that we have access to the court.
[35:59.040 --> 36:04.760] Now, I have sort of a plan B, C, and D in a chronological order with this, the beginning.
[36:04.760 --> 36:10.880] Not really a different plan, but maybe I need to write a book about this process of doing
[36:10.880 --> 36:13.040] criminal complaints or we need to write a book.
[36:13.040 --> 36:17.680] Maybe a lot of people, I'm going to join the Republican Party, it's talking to Richard
[36:17.680 --> 36:19.320] Leeds about that.
[36:19.320 --> 36:26.400] And I'm really liking a lot of local Republicans in Austin, some of them are anti-maskers.
[36:26.400 --> 36:30.720] And we have some sort of Libertarian ones out by Buda, by San Marquez.
[36:30.720 --> 36:37.280] So, you know, I'm no longer a party person, I'll never go democratic again.
[36:37.280 --> 36:42.680] And you know, so now I'm just, I'm going to be a Republican for the rest of my life.
[36:42.680 --> 36:45.520] And I want to teach them these techniques.
[36:45.520 --> 36:53.000] This kind of highlights the problem the Democratic Party's having.
[36:53.000 --> 37:00.400] When you were young and full of human vinegar and had all these high ideals, you were Democrat.
[37:00.400 --> 37:07.920] But as you had experience in the real world you and I live in, your perspective tends
[37:07.920 --> 37:15.720] to change and it tends to move more to the conservative side.
[37:15.720 --> 37:22.120] And the average age of the American public is increasing steadily.
[37:22.120 --> 37:30.120] They don't have enough young idealistic people who haven't had enough life experience to
[37:30.120 --> 37:34.240] understand what's really going on.
[37:34.240 --> 37:39.280] You've had that experience and you're naturally moving, I'm not saying Republican Party, but
[37:39.280 --> 37:41.640] to a more conservative view.
[37:41.640 --> 37:45.600] But does that sound accurate, Mary?
[37:45.600 --> 37:51.960] I love what MAGA has done and I might not be Republican if it hadn't been for MAGA.
[37:51.960 --> 37:57.480] But some of my friends are also suggesting the Republican Party and you know, kind of
[37:57.480 --> 37:58.920] more of the Tea Party side.
[37:58.920 --> 38:04.200] I've tried the local of the trans, I've tried the local green parties, of course I was born
[38:04.200 --> 38:09.120] into the Democrat scene here with all the environmentalism and quite frankly loved a
[38:09.120 --> 38:14.400] lot of them in my 20s and 30s, but people that aren't working within the rule of law
[38:14.400 --> 38:20.040] or constitutional understanding get thrown off track and even these well-meaning hippies
[38:20.040 --> 38:24.920] have been, you know, being used by the money and the fame.
[38:24.920 --> 38:27.560] I've seen it too much and it thickens me.
[38:27.560 --> 38:33.280] I'd rather be around some angry Republicans than all of these Democrats or Libertarians
[38:33.280 --> 38:37.960] or green party people smoking their weed and being happy all the time and having each
[38:37.960 --> 38:40.480] other in the backs.
[38:40.480 --> 38:46.880] If you will read the Republican Party platform, I think you will be surprised.
[38:46.880 --> 38:54.160] I read it and when I got through with it, I thought these guys are Libertarians.
[38:54.160 --> 38:55.160] Yeah.
[38:55.160 --> 39:03.600] That's what the Republican Party platform says, but they don't exactly follow that platform
[39:03.600 --> 39:04.600] very much.
[39:04.600 --> 39:09.720] But if they did, they would be exactly what the Libertarians are proposing except they
[39:09.720 --> 39:17.040] wouldn't be proposing all of the outrageous laws that the Libertarians seem to have been
[39:17.040 --> 39:19.920] proposing just to make sure they don't get elected.
[39:19.920 --> 39:21.960] I've been very frustrated with them.
[39:21.960 --> 39:35.240] I did a keynote speech for the Libertarian Party in somewhere on the East Coast, I forget,
[39:35.240 --> 39:38.440] and I was real disappointed with them.
[39:38.440 --> 39:39.440] Yeah.
[39:39.440 --> 39:47.280] They suggested that they stop taking on highly contentious issues that makes sure that are
[39:47.280 --> 39:54.240] not terribly important in the overall scheme of things and start taking on real issues
[39:54.240 --> 39:56.440] that affect everybody every day.
[39:56.440 --> 40:01.800] A Bridgeport Connecticut, that's where it was.
[40:01.800 --> 40:04.440] And they never called me back.
[40:04.440 --> 40:08.160] It's funny how that worked.
[40:08.160 --> 40:11.560] Well, what would you do if you were me?
[40:11.560 --> 40:17.040] Because I want to move forward maybe this week or the next Monday and a week, and this
[40:17.040 --> 40:18.040] ball.
[40:18.040 --> 40:22.200] Let me explain how I use criminal complaints.
[40:22.200 --> 40:24.760] I use them as a tool.
[40:24.760 --> 40:28.000] It's just one of the tools in the box.
[40:28.000 --> 40:31.000] If public official steps across the line, I pulled that tool out.
[40:31.000 --> 40:41.880] I went to Johnson County yesterday and gave a criminal complaint against a district judge
[40:41.880 --> 40:44.000] to another district judge.
[40:44.000 --> 40:48.880] I gave it to the bailiff, and the bailiff took it back to the judge in chambers, and
[40:48.880 --> 40:52.560] he brought it back out and said the judge is not going to accept it.
[40:52.560 --> 40:54.000] Sorry, Bubba.
[40:54.000 --> 40:55.000] He touched it.
[40:55.000 --> 40:56.000] He stuck to it.
[40:56.000 --> 41:01.200] Well, the judge is not going to accept anything that doesn't have a cause number on it.
[41:01.200 --> 41:03.600] Well, I'm not invoking his duty as a judge.
[41:03.600 --> 41:08.840] I'm invoking his duty as a magistrate, and that's a duty from which he may not shield
[41:08.840 --> 41:09.840] himself.
[41:09.840 --> 41:14.400] He said, well, you'll have to find some other way to do this.
[41:14.400 --> 41:15.400] I got another way.
[41:15.400 --> 41:23.960] I took out my phone and dialed 911, and he's standing there looking at me, but the phone
[41:23.960 --> 41:24.960] wasn't working.
[41:24.960 --> 41:28.200] I had to go out in the hall, and it still didn't work.
[41:28.200 --> 41:32.680] So I went to the clerk and asked the clerk to use her phone.
[41:32.680 --> 41:34.360] She said, well, this is not a public phone.
[41:34.360 --> 41:35.960] Well, I don't want to make a public call.
[41:35.960 --> 41:39.920] I want you to dial 911 and then give me the receiver.
[41:39.920 --> 41:40.920] She thought I was joking.
[41:40.920 --> 41:41.920] No, I am not joking.
[41:41.920 --> 41:45.920] I want them to arrest the district judge.
[41:45.920 --> 41:50.600] Oops, she ran and got her boss, and they suggested I go to the bailiff.
[41:50.600 --> 41:54.720] So I went to the bailiff, and the bailiff is standing there talking.
[41:54.720 --> 41:55.720] And I said, well, hi, guys.
[41:55.720 --> 41:56.720] How's it going?
[41:56.720 --> 41:57.720] Oh, it's going pretty good.
[41:57.720 --> 42:00.320] Well, it's about to go downhill.
[42:00.320 --> 42:06.720] I need you to call 911 and get me an officer out here to arrest Judge Boswell.
[42:06.720 --> 42:07.720] Oops.
[42:07.720 --> 42:15.720] The day kind of went south at that point, but that's just a tool.
[42:15.720 --> 42:21.440] It's not something real dramatic.
[42:21.440 --> 42:29.320] It's just a matter of fact, he stepped across this legal line, and in doing so, invoked the
[42:29.320 --> 42:32.280] criminal laws of the state of Texas.
[42:32.280 --> 42:35.880] And I got a sergeant on the bailiff.
[42:35.880 --> 42:39.880] She came up, and they wouldn't call the sheriff's department.
[42:39.880 --> 42:42.080] My phone wasn't working in their courthouse.
[42:42.080 --> 42:47.440] So they sent up this sergeant, and she was a woman I had seen there before.
[42:47.440 --> 42:50.160] She's always been very pleasant and professional.
[42:50.160 --> 42:55.720] And she handed me very well, because I stood right on her.
[42:55.720 --> 42:59.440] I told her, I need you to take my criminal complaint against the judge.
[42:59.440 --> 43:00.520] She said, well, we're bailiffs.
[43:00.520 --> 43:01.520] We don't do that.
[43:01.520 --> 43:06.120] I said, wait a minute, you're a certified peace officer in the state of Texas, aren't
[43:06.120 --> 43:07.120] she?
[43:07.120 --> 43:08.120] She said, yes, I am.
[43:08.120 --> 43:13.960] And in that case, under 2.13 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, you do that.
[43:13.960 --> 43:17.120] Now take my complaint.
[43:17.120 --> 43:22.440] Well, it got a little tense, and I never backed up from her.
[43:22.440 --> 43:32.400] At one point, I told her, is it not clear to you that this is not my first rodeo?
[43:32.400 --> 43:34.800] Mr. Calton, I get that impression.
[43:34.800 --> 43:40.400] Go get me a voluntary statement, and I will fill it out and give it to you.
[43:40.400 --> 43:42.400] And she wouldn't got them.
[43:42.400 --> 43:45.520] I filled them out, and she sent me to the sheriff's department with them.
[43:45.520 --> 43:47.320] I said, OK, that'll work.
[43:47.320 --> 44:00.480] Hang on, Randy Calton, we're at fountain, wheels are radio, we'll be right back.
[44:00.480 --> 44:06.520] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.520 --> 44:11.240] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.240 --> 44:16.840] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:16.840 --> 44:22.360] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[44:22.360 --> 44:25.760] Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[44:25.760 --> 44:31.480] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[44:31.480 --> 44:36.760] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor, along with
[44:36.760 --> 44:43.560] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others, where you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com to help
[44:43.560 --> 44:47.480] you improve as you help support quality radio.
[44:47.480 --> 44:51.440] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:51.440 --> 44:57.080] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[44:57.080 --> 44:59.080] increase your income.
[44:59.080 --> 45:00.080] Order now.
[45:00.080 --> 45:04.200] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.200 --> 45:10.200] In your case, without an attorney, with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, poor CD
[45:10.200 --> 45:15.200] course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.200 --> 45:19.200] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.200 --> 45:23.200] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.200 --> 45:28.200] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.200 --> 45:33.200] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:33.200 --> 45:39.200] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[45:39.200 --> 45:43.200] principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.200 --> 45:49.200] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.200 --> 45:52.200] pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.200 --> 45:56.200] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[45:56.200 --> 46:03.200] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:26.200 --> 46:50.200] Okay, we are back.
[46:50.200 --> 46:52.200] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[46:52.200 --> 46:56.200] Okay, Mary, do we have a plan?
[46:56.200 --> 46:59.200] Wait, I can hear you better if I unmute you.
[46:59.200 --> 47:01.200] Gotcha, go ahead.
[47:01.200 --> 47:05.200] So, are you saying I can just go up to the Sheriff's Department and ask for a voluntary
[47:05.200 --> 47:09.200] statement form and fill out their criminal complaint there?
[47:09.200 --> 47:15.200] No, I had to do that because I forgot to take my folder with me that had my criminal complaint
[47:15.200 --> 47:17.200] forms in it.
[47:17.200 --> 47:28.200] I suggest you put together a criminal complaint form and you can find the format on jurismprudence.website.
[47:28.200 --> 47:29.200] Okay.
[47:29.200 --> 47:35.200] And have it, take it to the bank and have them notify it for you.
[47:35.200 --> 47:36.200] And take that with you.
[47:36.200 --> 47:40.200] Now, I don't like taking them to police.
[47:40.200 --> 47:44.200] I just happened to be in the courthouse and tried to give them to a judge.
[47:44.200 --> 47:51.200] And I could have took them to all the other judges, but I had enough of a fight.
[47:51.200 --> 47:56.200] And I was really just trying to get them all stirred up.
[47:56.200 --> 47:58.200] And it worked pretty good.
[47:58.200 --> 48:05.200] And part of it, I wanted to demonstrate to them that I wasn't a patriot mythologist,
[48:05.200 --> 48:09.200] that I wasn't down here just with an attitude.
[48:09.200 --> 48:15.200] And, you know, I told this sergeant when she's trying to dodge taking the complaint against
[48:15.200 --> 48:21.200] the sheriff, and when I told her it's not my first rodeo, I said, you need to understand.
[48:21.200 --> 48:27.200] I selected Judge Boswell's worth for this very carefully.
[48:27.200 --> 48:30.200] I'm not doing anything to have hazard.
[48:30.200 --> 48:36.200] I have a plan and I don't need you to mess it up.
[48:36.200 --> 48:40.200] That's when she went and got my complaint.
[48:40.200 --> 48:42.200] I mean, she figured out she was being had.
[48:42.200 --> 48:45.200] She was out of her league and she realized it.
[48:45.200 --> 48:48.200] She told me to take it to the prosecutor.
[48:48.200 --> 48:51.200] No, no, no, not going to do that.
[48:51.200 --> 48:56.200] And I quoted the code to her, your 203 to her.
[48:56.200 --> 49:03.200] And she finally figured out that I wasn't just here trying to cause trouble that I had a plan.
[49:03.200 --> 49:08.200] And she wasn't sophisticated enough to figure the plan out.
[49:08.200 --> 49:11.200] And she certainly wasn't sophisticated enough to handle me.
[49:11.200 --> 49:15.200] The police will always try to handle you.
[49:15.200 --> 49:23.200] I suggest you make up a criminal complaint and take it to a district judge.
[49:23.200 --> 49:27.200] Preferably the head criminal district judge for Travis County.
[49:27.200 --> 49:37.200] Find out when he and who it is and when he's having or she is having motion hearings.
[49:37.200 --> 49:42.200] Put a nice suit on, dress up, look sharp.
[49:42.200 --> 49:45.200] Mary's pretty good at looking sharp.
[49:45.200 --> 49:48.200] Go in while they're having motion hearings.
[49:48.200 --> 49:49.200] Call the bailiff over.
[49:49.200 --> 49:52.200] Tell the bailiff to instruct the judge that you have business with court.
[49:52.200 --> 49:56.200] And the bailiff will say, may I tell the judge in nature of the business?
[49:56.200 --> 49:58.200] And depends on how you want to handle them.
[49:58.200 --> 50:00.200] I told the bailiff, no, you may not.
[50:00.200 --> 50:03.200] I have business with the judge and it's none of yours.
[50:03.200 --> 50:05.200] And I dismissed him.
[50:05.200 --> 50:06.200] Flick my fingers.
[50:06.200 --> 50:09.200] You're dismissed.
[50:09.200 --> 50:14.200] He was not a happy camper and I meant for him not to be.
[50:14.200 --> 50:19.200] But that was my style of doing this.
[50:19.200 --> 50:26.200] You can hand him a sealed folder and said, yes, you can.
[50:26.200 --> 50:28.200] When he says mad, tell him the nature of the business.
[50:28.200 --> 50:29.200] Yes, you can.
[50:29.200 --> 50:31.200] Give him this.
[50:31.200 --> 50:38.200] If you don't do that, then when the judge calls you, you say, you know, they'll say, are you Mary current Mary?
[50:38.200 --> 50:40.200] And I guess I am.
[50:40.200 --> 50:42.200] I understand you have business with the court.
[50:42.200 --> 50:43.200] That's what the judge did to me.
[50:43.200 --> 50:49.200] Yes, your honor, I do, and I held up this folder and said, may I approach?
[50:49.200 --> 50:55.200] And that means kind of give you this folder, but easier just to give it to the bailiff.
[50:55.200 --> 50:56.200] Make sure it's sealed.
[50:56.200 --> 50:59.200] If it's sealed, the bailiff won't open it.
[50:59.200 --> 51:04.200] And if it's sealed, the judge will think it's something really important.
[51:04.200 --> 51:10.200] And once he opens it and has it in his hands, it's stuck to him.
[51:10.200 --> 51:22.200] And this is what got all the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals finally put before a grand jury because it stuck to judge with it.
[51:22.200 --> 51:24.200] So that's the way I suggest you do it.
[51:24.200 --> 51:31.200] Then you get it in the hands of a district judge, the head criminal district judge best.
[51:31.200 --> 51:34.200] You are the master of the servant.
[51:34.200 --> 51:39.200] You do not go to the guy in the mailroom.
[51:39.200 --> 51:42.200] Or the person above him or the person above him.
[51:42.200 --> 51:46.200] You go to the head of the jurisdiction.
[51:46.200 --> 51:49.200] All of them answer to him.
[51:49.200 --> 51:50.200] He answers to you.
[51:50.200 --> 51:53.200] So you go to the top.
[51:53.200 --> 51:55.200] Head criminal district judge.
[51:55.200 --> 51:57.200] It was great.
[51:57.200 --> 52:00.200] I've told the story on air a number of times.
[52:00.200 --> 52:04.200] His name was Robert Hopkins.
[52:04.200 --> 52:10.200] He really liked this guy's and this particular judge is very congenial.
[52:10.200 --> 52:15.200] He wasn't very congenial after I dropped the criminal complaint on him.
[52:15.200 --> 52:18.200] This is what you might get when you do that.
[52:18.200 --> 52:19.200] I filed it.
[52:19.200 --> 52:24.200] I gave it to him when he said, or you miss Keltner said, yes, your honor, I am.
[52:24.200 --> 52:26.200] I understand you have business with the court.
[52:26.200 --> 52:27.200] Yes, your honor, I do.
[52:27.200 --> 52:29.200] And I held up this red folder.
[52:29.200 --> 52:31.200] May I approach?
[52:31.200 --> 52:34.200] And he was having hearings right at the bench.
[52:34.200 --> 52:36.200] So he said, well, sure, come on up.
[52:36.200 --> 52:39.200] And I laid the folder on his bench.
[52:39.200 --> 52:45.200] He opened it up and he's looking at criminal complaints against the district clerk, accusing
[52:45.200 --> 52:51.200] her of secret and criminal complaints against the district attorney from the grand jury.
[52:51.200 --> 52:56.200] And the complaints against the district attorney were that he secreted criminal complaints from
[52:56.200 --> 53:00.200] all the highest judges in Texas in the grand jury.
[53:00.200 --> 53:01.200] I'm sorry.
[53:01.200 --> 53:05.200] I said, Bob Perkins was his name.
[53:05.200 --> 53:08.200] He looked up at me with this.
[53:08.200 --> 53:11.200] He looked up at me and he said, well, Mr. Kelton, these are criminal complaints.
[53:11.200 --> 53:14.200] I said, yes, your honor, they are.
[53:14.200 --> 53:20.200] He said, well, Mr. Kelton, I'm a district judge and district judges in Travis County don't
[53:20.200 --> 53:22.200] take criminal complaints.
[53:22.200 --> 53:24.200] I said, that's okay, your honor.
[53:24.200 --> 53:27.200] I'm not here to invoke your duty as a district judge.
[53:27.200 --> 53:31.200] I'm here to invoke your duty as a magistrate.
[53:31.200 --> 53:35.200] And that's a duty from which you may not shield yourself.
[53:35.200 --> 53:40.200] And he looked at me and then he glanced over at the bailiff and I know what he was thinking.
[53:40.200 --> 53:46.200] If I have my bailiff shoot this guy, can I get away with it?
[53:46.200 --> 53:51.200] That's important to understand, Mary.
[53:51.200 --> 53:58.200] You're not there to seek the judge in his capacity as a judge.
[53:58.200 --> 54:03.200] You're there to seek his capacity as a magistrate.
[54:03.200 --> 54:09.200] And when a magistrate has it made known to him that a crime has been committed, he is
[54:09.200 --> 54:12.200] required to convene an examining court.
[54:12.200 --> 54:18.200] And the way a magistrate has it made known to him that a crime has been committed is by
[54:18.200 --> 54:22.200] a verified criminal affidavit by a credible person.
[54:22.200 --> 54:30.200] A credible person is a person over the age of majority, which in Texas is 18, and never
[54:30.200 --> 54:32.200] been convicted of a felony.
[54:32.200 --> 54:37.200] If you meet those criteria, you are a credible person.
[54:37.200 --> 54:42.200] By definition, it makes no difference what the judge thinks.
[54:42.200 --> 54:45.200] Makes no difference what the police think.
[54:45.200 --> 54:51.200] You have given them notice and that notice is statutorily valid.
[54:51.200 --> 54:52.200] Okay.
[54:52.200 --> 54:55.200] His duties and vote.
[54:55.200 --> 54:57.200] How long do I have to present this document?
[54:57.200 --> 55:00.200] This occurred already a week ago.
[55:00.200 --> 55:02.200] Yeah, you got two years.
[55:02.200 --> 55:06.200] But more quickly, the better.
[55:06.200 --> 55:12.200] This is how we take our voting booths back.
[55:12.200 --> 55:13.200] Okay.
[55:13.200 --> 55:18.200] Now, how long are they going to mess around on this before I know I got it?
[55:18.200 --> 55:23.200] Maybe, you know, file some unofficial pression or something or secreting.
[55:23.200 --> 55:24.200] Okay.
[55:24.200 --> 55:32.200] If you want to really light them up and make sure that they don't drag your feet, this
[55:32.200 --> 55:36.200] is a complaint against a public official.
[55:36.200 --> 55:44.200] So, if a prosecuting attorney hasn't made known to him that a public official has violated
[55:44.200 --> 55:49.200] a law relating to his office and shall reduce complaint to an information spit to
[55:49.200 --> 55:55.200] grand jury, means no discretion, zero.
[55:55.200 --> 55:58.200] So, don't give it to the prosecutor.
[55:58.200 --> 55:59.200] Okay.
[55:59.200 --> 56:01.200] Don't put him on this dime.
[56:01.200 --> 56:05.200] Make up a complaint, make 12 copies.
[56:05.200 --> 56:07.200] Put them in.
[56:07.200 --> 56:10.200] I just made some up and bound them into little booklets.
[56:10.200 --> 56:14.200] I think you were with me when I was doing that once.
[56:14.200 --> 56:18.200] Mary was with me when I filed a complaint against the governor.
[56:18.200 --> 56:19.200] Yeah.
[56:19.200 --> 56:23.200] Was that fun or what, Mary?
[56:23.200 --> 56:29.200] The guys told us to leave the court and I ran and you were still in there arguing with
[56:29.200 --> 56:30.200] this.
[56:30.200 --> 56:32.200] Oh, yeah, that's right.
[56:32.200 --> 56:35.200] They kept asking me, who are you?
[56:35.200 --> 56:36.200] I said, I'm his friend.
[56:36.200 --> 56:37.200] Who are you?
[56:37.200 --> 56:41.200] I'm his friend and I looked at the officers behind me, the entrance of the Travis County
[56:41.200 --> 56:42.200] court.
[56:42.200 --> 56:45.200] I said, I'm his witness.
[56:45.200 --> 56:52.200] So, anyway, you bind them up and prepare them for the grand jury.
[56:52.200 --> 56:55.200] Put them in an envelope.
[56:55.200 --> 57:02.200] Put a cover letter in the envelope that asks the foreman of the grand jury to initial this
[57:02.200 --> 57:03.200] document.
[57:03.200 --> 57:06.200] Don't sign it because the prosecutor has a rubber stamp with your name on it.
[57:06.200 --> 57:09.200] We want to make sure he didn't rubber stamp it.
[57:09.200 --> 57:16.200] And the last one I did, I sealed it with a wax seal and put a check box at the bottom
[57:16.200 --> 57:22.200] of the page asking the foreman to check this box if the seal was broken.
[57:22.200 --> 57:28.200] The only address you have for the grand jury is the district attorney's office.
[57:28.200 --> 57:34.200] So you put that envelope inside another envelope in the envelope with the cover letter.
[57:34.200 --> 57:39.200] You put a stamp, self-addressed envelope for the foreman to return this document to you.
[57:39.200 --> 57:42.200] Now, you'll never get that document back.
[57:42.200 --> 57:49.200] But seven days after you've mailed it, if you haven't received that document back, that
[57:49.200 --> 57:57.200] gives you reasonable, probable cause to believe that the foreman never got it.
[57:57.200 --> 58:03.200] And that gives you standing to raise criminal complaint, to raise the issue.
[58:03.200 --> 58:08.200] Now you file a complaint against the district attorney, accuse the district attorney of
[58:08.200 --> 58:10.200] tampering with a government doctor.
[58:10.200 --> 58:12.200] And it starts to get real serious.
[58:12.200 --> 58:15.200] It's not about getting them in front of the grand jury.
[58:15.200 --> 58:23.200] It's about raising a lot of stink and causing lots of political problems for everybody.
[58:23.200 --> 58:27.200] And when you start causing problems for the prosecutor and then the next place you go is
[58:27.200 --> 58:28.200] a district judge.
[58:28.200 --> 58:33.200] You file criminal charges against the prosecutor and then file against the district judge and
[58:33.200 --> 58:35.200] get everybody upset.
[58:35.200 --> 58:37.200] Who do you think you're going to throw under the bus?
[58:37.200 --> 58:38.200] Hang on.
[58:38.200 --> 58:40.200] Go into our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain.
[58:40.200 --> 58:50.200] Move our radio, we'll be right back.
[59:10.200 --> 59:39.200] We'll be right back.
[59:40.200 --> 01:00:04.200] We'll be right back.
[01:00:04.200 --> 01:00:30.200] We'll be right back.
[01:00:30.200 --> 01:00:56.200] We'll be right back.
[01:00:56.200 --> 01:01:22.200] We'll be right back.
[01:01:22.200 --> 01:01:48.200] We'll be right back.
[01:01:48.200 --> 01:02:17.200] We'll be right back.
[01:02:17.200 --> 01:02:43.200] We'll be right back.
[01:02:43.200 --> 01:03:09.200] We'll be right back.
[01:03:09.200 --> 01:03:38.200] We'll be right back.
[01:03:38.200 --> 01:04:07.200] We'll be right back.
[01:04:09.200 --> 01:04:10.200] Okay.
[01:04:10.200 --> 01:04:18.200] Well, if you'll put together a statement first and send it to me, we'll go over it and work
[01:04:18.200 --> 01:04:22.200] up a statement and then build a criminal complaint from the statement.
[01:04:22.200 --> 01:04:24.200] I've got a methodology for doing that.
[01:04:24.200 --> 01:04:33.200] If you will go to jurorsimprudence.website and go to documents and research and there's
[01:04:33.200 --> 01:04:36.200] a folder for Cherokee County.
[01:04:36.200 --> 01:04:44.200] I have a very large affidavit in there and from the affidavit I've generated about 35
[01:04:44.200 --> 01:04:52.200] criminal complaints and it will demonstrate how to write the affidavit so that it merges
[01:04:52.200 --> 01:04:55.200] with the criminal complaints.
[01:04:55.200 --> 01:04:56.200] Okay.
[01:04:56.200 --> 01:04:57.200] Okay.
[01:04:57.200 --> 01:04:59.200] Thank you, Mary.
[01:04:59.200 --> 01:05:01.200] Thank you so much.
[01:05:01.200 --> 01:05:06.200] Keep us on top of this.
[01:05:06.200 --> 01:05:07.200] Okay.
[01:05:07.200 --> 01:05:08.200] Hello, Tina.
[01:05:08.200 --> 01:05:09.200] Hello, Wendy.
[01:05:09.200 --> 01:05:12.200] What do you have for us today?
[01:05:12.200 --> 01:05:18.200] Oh, I have a lot of things, but I'm just going to bring up my couple.
[01:05:18.200 --> 01:05:20.200] One, I don't want to make a point.
[01:05:20.200 --> 01:05:22.200] Don't be childish.
[01:05:22.200 --> 01:05:25.200] Oh, no, that's only you that is childish.
[01:05:25.200 --> 01:05:27.200] That's never childish.
[01:05:27.200 --> 01:05:28.200] Just you.
[01:05:28.200 --> 01:05:30.200] No, feel disparaged.
[01:05:30.200 --> 01:05:31.200] Okay.
[01:05:31.200 --> 01:05:38.200] I wanted to bring up a point that I think a lot of people don't realize.
[01:05:38.200 --> 01:05:47.200] I was talking to a young woman in the late 20s in Maine the other day and she's just
[01:05:47.200 --> 01:05:55.200] about to finish a master's in business administration and she had no idea that Maine had their own
[01:05:55.200 --> 01:06:00.200] constitution or that any other state had their own constitution.
[01:06:00.200 --> 01:06:02.200] She had never read it.
[01:06:02.200 --> 01:06:07.200] I started reading a few points to which she's like, oh my God, I never knew.
[01:06:07.200 --> 01:06:13.200] And I'm a business major and I've never known this.
[01:06:13.200 --> 01:06:15.200] That is astonishing.
[01:06:15.200 --> 01:06:17.200] It is astonishing.
[01:06:17.200 --> 01:06:19.200] And frightening.
[01:06:19.200 --> 01:06:21.200] Yes.
[01:06:21.200 --> 01:06:23.200] Yes.
[01:06:23.200 --> 01:06:25.200] Master's in business administration.
[01:06:25.200 --> 01:06:29.200] We don't have civics classes anymore.
[01:06:29.200 --> 01:06:31.200] That's scary.
[01:06:31.200 --> 01:06:32.200] Yeah.
[01:06:32.200 --> 01:06:42.200] I decided with homeschooling, I'm going to be teaching a civics class, teach some basics
[01:06:42.200 --> 01:06:49.200] about law to young, impressionable minds.
[01:06:49.200 --> 01:06:55.200] I think it's a very good idea and I told this lady that she should start teaching her children
[01:06:55.200 --> 01:07:03.200] at a very early age, a little bit at the time, age appropriate, so that they know their rights.
[01:07:03.200 --> 01:07:11.200] This woman is a little bit active in the community on boards and things and she said she didn't
[01:07:11.200 --> 01:07:20.200] know that, you know, I did not realize that the people on these city councils and such
[01:07:20.200 --> 01:07:27.200] like work for us and that we through our local constitution, you know, have, you know, and
[01:07:27.200 --> 01:07:32.200] tell them what we want them to do, that we are in control, not them.
[01:07:32.200 --> 01:07:37.200] She thought that they were the ones that told us what we're supposed to do.
[01:07:37.200 --> 01:07:46.200] That she's done stuff for not law and this is an educated woman and she didn't know.
[01:07:46.200 --> 01:07:47.200] It's amazing.
[01:07:47.200 --> 01:07:52.200] And that was amazing to me and that's scary and I, you know, I think we all should read
[01:07:52.200 --> 01:07:58.200] our state constitution as well as the US one, you know, multiple times because it's a lot
[01:07:58.200 --> 01:08:04.200] to take in and it's a lot to understand but if we've never even been told we have one,
[01:08:04.200 --> 01:08:10.200] why would anyone think about it if they're being fed diets of reality TV and Kardashians
[01:08:10.200 --> 01:08:15.200] and everything, maybe they're trying to keep us ignorant.
[01:08:15.200 --> 01:08:21.200] So just a thought that we should all be practicing reading that.
[01:08:21.200 --> 01:08:28.200] And then I wanted to talk about bullying attorneys.
[01:08:28.200 --> 01:08:35.200] I've met one of them recently and he's just, he has thoughts that with me, you know, he
[01:08:35.200 --> 01:08:40.200] needs, and I've been finding out and researching the last few days to add to my
[01:08:40.200 --> 01:08:46.200] well complaints that attorneys are bound by rules of civility as well as, you know,
[01:08:46.200 --> 01:08:53.200] within the professional rules of conduct and where they have to be civil to proceed
[01:08:53.200 --> 01:09:01.200] as well as other attorneys and this particular man is, you know, he wants to talk settlement
[01:09:01.200 --> 01:09:06.200] with, you know, the four plaintiffs but he doesn't want to talk to me.
[01:09:06.200 --> 01:09:09.200] He has not approached me for settlement.
[01:09:09.200 --> 01:09:14.200] He tells the others I'm being unreasonable and I'm just very litigious.
[01:09:14.200 --> 01:09:22.200] I'm a professional litigator according to him and that, you know, if I'm involved it's
[01:09:22.200 --> 01:09:26.200] going to be high in the sky and he's not even going to deal with me.
[01:09:26.200 --> 01:09:32.200] He's just trying to pick off the two men in the group of four of us and settle with
[01:09:32.200 --> 01:09:38.200] them so he can take them out of the case and then leave the two women high and dry.
[01:09:38.200 --> 01:09:47.200] And he uses such demeaning words to the guys as, you know, well, what are you doing
[01:09:47.200 --> 01:09:54.200] this for, for a lousy $500, you know, why are you even in litigation?
[01:09:54.200 --> 01:09:57.200] Don't you have better things to do than this?
[01:09:57.200 --> 01:10:03.200] He told the other guy, well, if you're reasonable you'll get an Olympic gold medal but I won't
[01:10:03.200 --> 01:10:06.200] hold my breath.
[01:10:06.200 --> 01:10:16.200] Just so the meaning in derogatory and he's insisting that we cannot put in a joint settlement
[01:10:16.200 --> 01:10:22.200] offer that we each have to, he only wants to deal with it individually and that the judge
[01:10:22.200 --> 01:10:30.200] will not allow or will look frown upon us not accepting his client's offer in settlement.
[01:10:30.200 --> 01:10:38.200] So he's really trying every trick in the book to, you know, divide and conquer but we all
[01:10:38.200 --> 01:10:43.200] decided today that that wasn't going to happen, that we're not going to bow down.
[01:10:43.200 --> 01:10:49.200] I sent them a bunch of information about how to deal with bullying attorneys and then we
[01:10:49.200 --> 01:10:56.200] found out yesterday that the district attorney is filing charges by the end of June nail
[01:10:56.200 --> 01:11:02.200] and that what we didn't know before in the last few years that we have been assigned an
[01:11:02.200 --> 01:11:09.200] advocate within that case and as soon as it's filed we can ask for information and we have
[01:11:09.200 --> 01:11:11.200] never been told this before.
[01:11:11.200 --> 01:11:17.200] Oh, I just had an interesting thought.
[01:11:17.200 --> 01:11:25.200] Why is the prosecutor all, I'm sorry, why is the lawyer all of a sudden trying to push for a settlement?
[01:11:25.200 --> 01:11:31.200] Well, because we've asked for discovery and the judge gave us 60 more days for discovery
[01:11:31.200 --> 01:11:37.200] and we're about to file the motion to compel and she knows that his client's going to be
[01:11:37.200 --> 01:11:41.200] there if we get that discovered.
[01:11:41.200 --> 01:11:49.200] If he's looking at the prosecutor filing criminal complaints, he needs this settled before it gets
[01:11:49.200 --> 01:11:52.200] to those complaints.
[01:11:52.200 --> 01:11:54.200] Yeah.
[01:11:54.200 --> 01:11:58.200] He figures that will cause the criminal side to go away.
[01:11:58.200 --> 01:12:03.200] Well, the 56 other complaints decides for hours that the DA has.
[01:12:03.200 --> 01:12:10.200] So the DA would still have those but he feels probably that his client will maybe get a
[01:12:10.200 --> 01:12:16.200] lesser sense if she settles with four of us but she only wants to settle for a few pennies
[01:12:16.200 --> 01:12:19.200] on the dollar and that's not worth it to us.
[01:12:19.200 --> 01:12:21.200] We want justice.
[01:12:21.200 --> 01:12:23.200] We don't care if we get nothing.
[01:12:23.200 --> 01:12:27.200] We want to see her doing jail time so she won't do it to anyone else.
[01:12:27.200 --> 01:12:30.200] You want your piece of flesh.
[01:12:30.200 --> 01:12:31.200] We do.
[01:12:31.200 --> 01:12:32.200] Good.
[01:12:32.200 --> 01:12:39.200] The lady who is totally inexperienced is in this case and she said today, she said,
[01:12:39.200 --> 01:12:41.200] I have never been in court.
[01:12:41.200 --> 01:12:43.200] I have never had a ticket.
[01:12:43.200 --> 01:12:45.200] I have never had any legal dealings.
[01:12:45.200 --> 01:12:47.200] She said she's so insensitive.
[01:12:47.200 --> 01:12:53.200] She said I am going to pay for a consult with an attorney to find out what our steps are
[01:12:53.200 --> 01:13:00.200] and if we can stay the case while this criminal one's pending because she said I want to stop
[01:13:00.200 --> 01:13:02.200] this from happening to anyone else.
[01:13:02.200 --> 01:13:06.200] She said this is much civic duty.
[01:13:06.200 --> 01:13:07.200] Good.
[01:13:07.200 --> 01:13:08.200] I think that is good.
[01:13:08.200 --> 01:13:09.200] Good for her.
[01:13:09.200 --> 01:13:10.200] Yes.
[01:13:10.200 --> 01:13:13.200] And this is all your fault.
[01:13:13.200 --> 01:13:14.200] It's all my fault.
[01:13:14.200 --> 01:13:15.200] No, no, no.
[01:13:15.200 --> 01:13:17.200] It's yours and Brett's fault.
[01:13:17.200 --> 01:13:22.200] It really touched me too much.
[01:13:22.200 --> 01:13:24.200] But I find it very interesting about this.
[01:13:24.200 --> 01:13:25.200] Well, good.
[01:13:25.200 --> 01:13:28.200] Have you bar grieved this attorney yet?
[01:13:28.200 --> 01:13:32.200] No, I was waiting to see if he would settle, but he's not going to settle with me.
[01:13:32.200 --> 01:13:34.200] He's not even going to talk to me.
[01:13:34.200 --> 01:13:39.200] So I'm busy writing the motion to compel and I've got another document that I have to file
[01:13:39.200 --> 01:13:41.200] before I file that.
[01:13:41.200 --> 01:13:47.200] And then, which I only found out today, so I have to do that first, then I'll be writing
[01:13:47.200 --> 01:13:53.200] all these bar complaints and the other says, at least Colleen is going to file a one or
[01:13:53.200 --> 01:13:55.200] two herself.
[01:13:55.200 --> 01:14:00.200] We're just trying to figure out, in fact, I talked to one of another attorney at the
[01:14:00.200 --> 01:14:08.200] bankruptcy health line today and he suggested that we could put in the emails he's been
[01:14:08.200 --> 01:14:11.200] sending with his derogatory statements.
[01:14:11.200 --> 01:14:16.200] We could submit them to the court for the judge to see because...
[01:14:16.200 --> 01:14:19.200] And ask for sanctions.
[01:14:19.200 --> 01:14:20.200] Yeah.
[01:14:20.200 --> 01:14:29.200] Then it would be necessary to give evidence for the sanctions and that would get these
[01:14:29.200 --> 01:14:32.200] emails and such onto the record.
[01:14:32.200 --> 01:14:37.200] That's what I'm thinking is if we put them in there, it shows that he's not being civil,
[01:14:37.200 --> 01:14:41.200] he's not adhering to the rules of professional behavior.
[01:14:41.200 --> 01:14:46.200] And according to an attorney a few days ago that I spoke with, when I read some of those
[01:14:46.200 --> 01:14:50.200] statements to him, he asked for the name of the attorney and I gave it to him.
[01:14:50.200 --> 01:14:55.200] He said, oh, him, he's a total jerk and everybody knows it in the court now.
[01:14:55.200 --> 01:14:59.200] He said he is horrible to women and to the elderly.
[01:14:59.200 --> 01:15:07.200] And if no attorney with the assault would speak to women and the elderly like he does.
[01:15:07.200 --> 01:15:08.200] So good.
[01:15:08.200 --> 01:15:11.200] That might actually get him sanctions.
[01:15:11.200 --> 01:15:15.200] If everybody knows that he'd like that, yeah.
[01:15:15.200 --> 01:15:16.200] So good.
[01:15:16.200 --> 01:15:21.200] We have a special term for that in Texas.
[01:15:21.200 --> 01:15:24.200] It's called comeuppance.
[01:15:24.200 --> 01:15:30.200] Well, even if she doesn't sanction him, I'm going to have fun because he thinks I'm a
[01:15:30.200 --> 01:15:31.200] professional litigator.
[01:15:31.200 --> 01:15:34.200] He says that I think I'm an attorney.
[01:15:34.200 --> 01:15:40.200] He's still got this sore patch from seven years ago when his client submitted a false
[01:15:40.200 --> 01:15:46.200] claim into my own bankruptcy and I rebutted it point by point with a squander for David
[01:15:46.200 --> 01:15:49.200] and I never heard from him or them again.
[01:15:49.200 --> 01:15:51.200] Not one piece out of them.
[01:15:51.200 --> 01:15:56.200] And he keeps hopping back to that that his client accused me of fraud.
[01:15:56.200 --> 01:16:00.200] Well, anybody can accuse anyone of fraud and she did accuse me of fraud.
[01:16:00.200 --> 01:16:05.200] They didn't go anywhere because I rebutted everything point by point and proved that she
[01:16:05.200 --> 01:16:10.200] had committed treachery.
[01:16:10.200 --> 01:16:14.200] They never, never, ever contacted me again and he's still sore about that.
[01:16:14.200 --> 01:16:15.200] Good.
[01:16:15.200 --> 01:16:21.200] He might have took this case just to get back at you and that may turn out to be a very
[01:16:21.200 --> 01:16:22.200] big mistake.
[01:16:22.200 --> 01:16:23.200] Okay.
[01:16:23.200 --> 01:16:25.200] Do you have more for us on the other side?
[01:16:25.200 --> 01:16:26.200] Oh, no, no, no.
[01:16:26.200 --> 01:16:27.200] I'm going to let other people come in.
[01:16:27.200 --> 01:16:30.200] I can talk to you later about different things.
[01:16:30.200 --> 01:16:31.200] Okay.
[01:16:31.200 --> 01:16:35.200] Check your email.
[01:16:35.200 --> 01:16:37.200] I'm going to send you a couple of motions to compel discovery.
[01:16:37.200 --> 01:16:39.200] Just as samples for you.
[01:16:39.200 --> 01:16:40.200] Okay.
[01:16:40.200 --> 01:16:41.200] Great.
[01:16:41.200 --> 01:16:42.200] Thanks very much.
[01:16:42.200 --> 01:16:43.200] I appreciate that.
[01:16:43.200 --> 01:16:44.200] Okay.
[01:16:44.200 --> 01:16:45.200] See you later.
[01:16:45.200 --> 01:16:46.200] Okay.
[01:16:46.200 --> 01:16:47.200] Thank you, Tina.
[01:16:47.200 --> 01:16:51.200] This is Randy Kelton wet fountain rule of law radio.
[01:16:51.200 --> 01:16:53.200] Go on to our sponsors.
[01:16:53.200 --> 01:16:57.200] When we come back, we'll be taking what appears to be a first time caller.
[01:16:57.200 --> 01:16:58.200] Hang on.
[01:16:58.200 --> 01:17:00.200] We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.200 --> 01:17:05.200] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.200 --> 01:17:09.200] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares proven method.
[01:17:09.200 --> 01:17:13.200] Michael Meares has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:17:13.200 --> 01:17:14.200] can win two.
[01:17:14.200 --> 01:17:19.200] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.200 --> 01:17:20.200] civil rights statute.
[01:17:20.200 --> 01:17:24.200] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons?
[01:17:24.200 --> 01:17:26.200] How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.200 --> 01:17:29.200] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:29.200 --> 01:17:33.200] Turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.200 --> 01:17:38.200] The Michael Meares proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.200 --> 01:17:40.200] Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.200 --> 01:17:46.200] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner
[01:17:46.200 --> 01:17:49.200] or email Michael Meares at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.200 --> 01:17:57.200] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.200 --> 01:18:00.200] You can learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:27.200 --> 01:18:34.200] Now, go to ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:18:34.200 --> 01:18:37.200] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.200 --> 01:18:43.200] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.200 --> 01:18:44.200] Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.200 --> 01:18:45.200] No.
[01:18:45.200 --> 01:18:47.200] Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.200 --> 01:18:48.200] No.
[01:18:48.200 --> 01:18:49.200] Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.200 --> 01:18:50.200] No.
[01:18:50.200 --> 01:18:51.200] I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.200 --> 01:18:54.200] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money?
[01:18:54.200 --> 01:18:55.200] This is perfect.
[01:18:55.200 --> 01:18:56.200] Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.200 --> 01:18:58.200] We are welcome.
[01:18:58.200 --> 01:19:27.200] Happy Holidays, Logos!
[01:19:28.200 --> 01:19:33.200] Okay, we are back.
[01:19:33.200 --> 01:19:42.200] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio on this Friday, the 7th day of May, 2021.
[01:19:42.200 --> 01:19:46.200] And we're going to what appears to be a new caller.
[01:19:46.200 --> 01:19:59.200] If you are from the 505 area code, give us a first name and a state.
[01:19:59.200 --> 01:20:00.200] Hmm.
[01:20:00.200 --> 01:20:02.200] Hello, hello.
[01:20:02.200 --> 01:20:08.200] If you're from New Mexico.
[01:20:08.200 --> 01:20:14.200] It looks like we've lost our, we must have put our new caller to sleep.
[01:20:14.200 --> 01:20:17.200] I seem to have that effect on people.
[01:20:17.200 --> 01:20:20.200] Okay, I'll try back later.
[01:20:20.200 --> 01:20:23.200] Now we're going to go to Bob in California.
[01:20:23.200 --> 01:20:26.200] Bob, what have you been up to?
[01:20:26.200 --> 01:20:27.200] Hello?
[01:20:27.200 --> 01:20:28.200] Yeah.
[01:20:28.200 --> 01:20:32.200] Hello, you're on.
[01:20:32.200 --> 01:20:34.200] I'm on.
[01:20:34.200 --> 01:20:36.200] You are on live.
[01:20:36.200 --> 01:20:37.200] Okay.
[01:20:37.200 --> 01:20:40.200] How are you doing, Randy?
[01:20:40.200 --> 01:20:43.200] I'm doing good for an old fat guy.
[01:20:43.200 --> 01:20:58.200] Oh, I had a question tonight about being asked medical questions by a police officer.
[01:20:58.200 --> 01:21:03.200] Okay.
[01:21:03.200 --> 01:21:06.200] What type of medical questions?
[01:21:06.200 --> 01:21:15.200] Well, what, what do you ale from?
[01:21:15.200 --> 01:21:18.200] Do you have any physical impurities?
[01:21:18.200 --> 01:21:23.200] Do you have any mental problems?
[01:21:23.200 --> 01:21:27.200] Then what, what do you take for those problems?
[01:21:27.200 --> 01:21:31.200] And that kind of just questions.
[01:21:31.200 --> 01:21:37.200] Oh, is this a Dolbert's hearing?
[01:21:37.200 --> 01:21:41.200] That's what you should ask him.
[01:21:41.200 --> 01:21:43.200] Dolbert?
[01:21:43.200 --> 01:21:46.200] D-A-U-V-E-R-T-S.
[01:21:46.200 --> 01:21:50.200] Dolbert's.
[01:21:50.200 --> 01:22:07.200] It's not only used to test the qualifications of a expert witness, but it's also used as a, to test the mental capacity of a witness or a litigant.
[01:22:07.200 --> 01:22:23.200] Okay. Well, I found it puzzling, I got pulled over a couple days ago at eight in the morning to a sobriety test on the side of the road.
[01:22:23.200 --> 01:22:25.200] At eight in the morning?
[01:22:25.200 --> 01:22:28.200] Yeah.
[01:22:28.200 --> 01:22:29.200] That's weird.
[01:22:29.200 --> 01:22:30.200] Yep.
[01:22:30.200 --> 01:22:33.200] What was the grounds for pulling you over?
[01:22:33.200 --> 01:22:39.200] He said that I was on my cell phone.
[01:22:39.200 --> 01:22:41.200] Oh.
[01:22:41.200 --> 01:22:46.200] People who are on their cell phone tend to get drunk early in the mornings.
[01:22:46.200 --> 01:22:48.200] Right.
[01:22:48.200 --> 01:22:56.200] Well, I can't wait to, when it comes up to bring the cell records because that wasn't the case at all.
[01:22:56.200 --> 01:23:07.200] Anyway, I just was wondering because he asked me these questions and then after I told him about some physical problems I had,
[01:23:07.200 --> 01:23:23.200] I told him that I had a hernia and he proceeded to give me lift up this foot, place this foot over here, walk with this foot here, look up at this.
[01:23:23.200 --> 01:23:33.200] And I just thought that he let me know right away that he was very well trained.
[01:23:33.200 --> 01:23:45.200] But I wonder how well trained he is because if someone has a physical problem, you don't ask them to do something that might be a problem.
[01:23:45.200 --> 01:23:51.200] At least that's the way I see it.
[01:23:51.200 --> 01:23:57.200] I still don't get how he got to a sobriety test.
[01:23:57.200 --> 01:23:59.200] What was the probable cause?
[01:23:59.200 --> 01:24:04.200] It takes some pretty serious probable cause to get to a sobriety test.
[01:24:04.200 --> 01:24:08.200] Did you see him in the lane?
[01:24:08.200 --> 01:24:09.200] No.
[01:24:09.200 --> 01:24:12.200] My eyes were glassing.
[01:24:12.200 --> 01:24:18.200] I saw that from his zooming back.
[01:24:18.200 --> 01:24:20.200] What's that?
[01:24:20.200 --> 01:24:26.200] He just saw you go bowing down the road and he decided that your eyes looked glassy so he had to pull you over.
[01:24:26.200 --> 01:24:37.200] I was at a stop sign and he was also at the stop sign to my right and as I pulled through the intersection he pulled.
[01:24:37.200 --> 01:24:49.200] So he didn't see you driving so he couldn't have seen you weaving or anything that would give him a reason to believe that you were under the influence.
[01:24:49.200 --> 01:24:51.200] Right.
[01:24:51.200 --> 01:25:04.200] Other than when he got, he said I was, because I wasn't, you know, when I told him that the information that he was asking me about could that be used against me in a court of law.
[01:25:04.200 --> 01:25:13.200] He didn't like that answer and he, you know, just went kind of downhill from there.
[01:25:13.200 --> 01:25:26.200] Just when he started getting, where's your hands and do you have any weapons is when I called 911 because I felt he was a little irritated.
[01:25:26.200 --> 01:25:32.200] Once you call 911, did he continue or did he stop?
[01:25:32.200 --> 01:25:38.200] They continue what?
[01:25:38.200 --> 01:25:40.200] The questioning?
[01:25:40.200 --> 01:25:43.200] The questioning or the sobriety test?
[01:25:43.200 --> 01:25:45.200] He's left all the air against and all that.
[01:25:45.200 --> 01:25:49.200] No, no, that all came after.
[01:25:49.200 --> 01:25:53.200] After I called 911 he persisted.
[01:25:53.200 --> 01:25:56.200] Then that's retaliation.
[01:25:56.200 --> 01:26:09.200] That's what I said at the time that I'm being retaliated on because I've got criminal complaints out on a criminal complaint to get to other officers in that district.
[01:26:09.200 --> 01:26:15.200] Anyway, it came to a lieutenant was there.
[01:26:15.200 --> 01:26:19.200] It doesn't really matter so much what is true.
[01:26:19.200 --> 01:26:23.200] Perception is everything.
[01:26:23.200 --> 01:26:28.200] So, since you file criminal complaints against them in the past.
[01:26:28.200 --> 01:26:33.200] Now they pull you over and they find out who you are and they retaliate against you.
[01:26:33.200 --> 01:26:39.200] Doesn't matter if they did or not, if it looks like they did, that's good enough.
[01:26:39.200 --> 01:26:43.200] Yeah, and for nothing.
[01:26:43.200 --> 01:26:45.200] Pretty much a party test.
[01:26:45.200 --> 01:26:47.200] Hey, the morning.
[01:26:47.200 --> 01:26:48.200] Right.
[01:26:48.200 --> 01:26:51.200] Crazy.
[01:26:51.200 --> 01:26:53.200] Okay.
[01:26:53.200 --> 01:26:59.200] Well, I've got some ideas where to go from here.
[01:26:59.200 --> 01:27:01.200] And I appreciate your time.
[01:27:01.200 --> 01:27:06.200] Have you been filing professional conduct complaints against officers?
[01:27:06.200 --> 01:27:07.200] I haven't.
[01:27:07.200 --> 01:27:16.200] I sent away the post to get a find out about filing with them, but I haven't heard from them yet.
[01:27:16.200 --> 01:27:18.200] Back from them.
[01:27:18.200 --> 01:27:19.200] And I'm not.
[01:27:19.200 --> 01:27:21.200] That's who you might check the website.
[01:27:21.200 --> 01:27:24.200] Did you only have an online form?
[01:27:24.200 --> 01:27:35.200] I looked, that's where I looked and I didn't find that so I sent them an email asking how one would go about filing a complaint.
[01:27:35.200 --> 01:27:37.200] So I haven't heard from them.
[01:27:37.200 --> 01:27:38.200] Anyway.
[01:27:38.200 --> 01:27:44.200] I'm sure they're not in a big hurry to tell you about it.
[01:27:44.200 --> 01:27:45.200] Yeah.
[01:27:45.200 --> 01:27:46.200] Okay.
[01:27:46.200 --> 01:27:53.200] Anyway, I just was kind of curious how that would all come down in the end.
[01:27:53.200 --> 01:27:58.200] Everything is, the perception is everything.
[01:27:58.200 --> 01:28:05.200] If it looks bad, and on the, on the face of it, if it looks bad, you can really give them a hard time about them.
[01:28:05.200 --> 01:28:10.200] And if you, you might get a nice suit out of this.
[01:28:10.200 --> 01:28:12.200] Oh.
[01:28:12.200 --> 01:28:13.200] Okay.
[01:28:13.200 --> 01:28:14.200] Here's the way it works.
[01:28:14.200 --> 01:28:20.200] You know, it doesn't make any difference if you have the facts and the law are on your side.
[01:28:20.200 --> 01:28:27.200] You know, I tell people, you can never expect back to win your case simply because you have the facts and law on your side.
[01:28:27.200 --> 01:28:30.200] They can't either.
[01:28:30.200 --> 01:28:35.200] Perception is everything.
[01:28:35.200 --> 01:28:45.200] And when loser draw, you're going to cost them a lot of time, a lot of money, a lot of headaches and harassment, or at least they're going to feel harassed.
[01:28:45.200 --> 01:28:51.200] So it's going to be difficult for them, especially if you start filing professional conduct complaints against those officers.
[01:28:51.200 --> 01:28:57.200] You do a couple of those and they won't be able to tie an officer up and throw him at you.
[01:28:57.200 --> 01:28:58.200] Okay.
[01:28:58.200 --> 01:29:06.200] Because that dramatically affects their employability.
[01:29:06.200 --> 01:29:12.200] That's the most invasive thing you can do to a police officer.
[01:29:12.200 --> 01:29:16.200] Complaints with his boss that go in the trash.
[01:29:16.200 --> 01:29:26.200] They'll probably joke about it in their meetings in the morning about how this officer gets more complaints.
[01:29:26.200 --> 01:29:28.200] He must be doing his job.
[01:29:28.200 --> 01:29:39.200] But when they start getting professional conduct complaints with post and their bond rating goes up, they're not going to think that's so funny.
[01:29:39.200 --> 01:29:43.200] Well, it starts costing the jurisdiction a lot more money.
[01:29:43.200 --> 01:29:46.200] Then the policeman will have himself a problem.
[01:29:46.200 --> 01:29:52.200] Hang on, Randy Shelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, a calling number.
[01:29:52.200 --> 01:29:57.200] Oh, we got four. We'll be right back.
[01:29:57.200 --> 01:30:01.200] I should get that up.
[01:30:01.200 --> 01:30:03.200] Sorry, soft drink lovers.
[01:30:03.200 --> 01:30:05.200] Even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:30:05.200 --> 01:30:10.200] A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff.
[01:30:10.200 --> 01:30:12.200] I've got your account for it all, Brett.
[01:30:12.200 --> 01:30:16.200] I'll be back in a moment with the scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:30:16.200 --> 01:30:18.200] Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.200 --> 01:30:22.200] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.200 --> 01:30:26.200] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.200 --> 01:30:28.200] So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.200 --> 01:30:32.200] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.200 --> 01:30:34.200] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.200 --> 01:30:38.200] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.200 --> 01:30:42.200] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.200 --> 01:30:45.200] Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.200 --> 01:30:50.200] Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong.
[01:30:50.200 --> 01:30:55.200] Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:55.200 --> 01:31:02.200] They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[01:31:02.200 --> 01:31:06.200] The study's authors say artificial sweeteners triggered the appetite,
[01:31:06.200 --> 01:31:09.200] but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:31:09.200 --> 01:31:12.200] Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings,
[01:31:12.200 --> 01:31:15.200] which can result in a larger overall calorie intake.
[01:31:15.200 --> 01:31:18.200] So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight,
[01:31:18.200 --> 01:31:23.200] and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:31:23.200 --> 01:31:25.200] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:25.200 --> 01:31:28.200] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:28.200 --> 01:31:35.200] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:35.200 --> 01:31:37.200] The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:37.200 --> 01:31:42.200] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.200 --> 01:31:45.200] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.200 --> 01:31:48.200] And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[01:31:48.200 --> 01:31:49.200] I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.200 --> 01:31:50.200] I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.200 --> 01:31:51.200] I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:51.200 --> 01:31:52.200] I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:52.200 --> 01:31:54.200] I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.200 --> 01:31:57.200] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.200 --> 01:32:00.200] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:27.200 --> 01:32:29.200] The New York City Corp.
[01:32:29.200 --> 01:32:58.200] The New York City Corp.
[01:32:59.200 --> 01:33:04.200] Looking for some truth?
[01:33:04.200 --> 01:33:05.200] You found it.
[01:33:05.200 --> 01:33:34.200] LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:35.200 --> 01:34:03.200] Okay, we are back.
[01:34:03.200 --> 01:34:17.200] Okay, Bob, how is your federal cases and these other cases where you're going after the city?
[01:34:17.200 --> 01:34:19.200] How is that going?
[01:34:19.200 --> 01:34:34.200] Well, they're squirming.
[01:34:34.200 --> 01:34:39.200] I have just an appeal that they've referred back to a new trial room on the traffic.
[01:34:39.200 --> 01:34:44.200] And other than that, I don't have anything.
[01:34:44.200 --> 01:34:48.200] Oh, so effectively you won the appeal?
[01:34:48.200 --> 01:34:51.200] They reversed and demanded.
[01:34:51.200 --> 01:34:52.200] Right.
[01:34:52.200 --> 01:34:56.200] Pro say to win an appeal against them.
[01:34:56.200 --> 01:35:02.200] That's got to cut a button off the prosecutor's shirt.
[01:35:02.200 --> 01:35:10.200] Well, it was the police officer, and I don't think he's too happy with me.
[01:35:10.200 --> 01:35:11.200] But good.
[01:35:11.200 --> 01:35:13.200] I have another question, Randy.
[01:35:13.200 --> 01:35:16.200] Something came up kind of interesting.
[01:35:16.200 --> 01:35:32.200] When I got a oath of office for the judge, I went on the legislative site and they have
[01:35:32.200 --> 01:35:37.200] an oath of office that all public employees will take.
[01:35:37.200 --> 01:35:46.200] And at the end of that, it says this oath and no other.
[01:35:46.200 --> 01:35:53.200] But the oath that I got on the judge was not the oath that the government code says he's
[01:35:53.200 --> 01:35:54.200] supposed to take.
[01:35:54.200 --> 01:35:58.200] It was a shortened version of that oath.
[01:35:58.200 --> 01:36:04.200] Oh, you constantly got the wrong oath.
[01:36:04.200 --> 01:36:09.200] I've got a cliff note.
[01:36:09.200 --> 01:36:10.200] What?
[01:36:10.200 --> 01:36:14.200] That is an interesting cliff note.
[01:36:14.200 --> 01:36:15.200] Yeah.
[01:36:15.200 --> 01:36:23.200] I sent an email to Brett about that, but I had a free poem about the oaths where they
[01:36:23.200 --> 01:36:27.200] had the oath that the judge gave.
[01:36:27.200 --> 01:36:36.200] They gave on the judge is a shortened version of the oath that they're supposed to take.
[01:36:36.200 --> 01:36:38.200] And no other.
[01:36:38.200 --> 01:36:47.200] I'm often amazed at how callous they are.
[01:36:47.200 --> 01:36:55.200] I mean, didn't anybody look at this and say, you know, this could come back and bite us
[01:36:55.200 --> 01:37:03.200] in the behind big time because if somebody raises an issue about this and the courts
[01:37:03.200 --> 01:37:11.200] say the legislature was very clear when they said no other, that would render all the rulings
[01:37:11.200 --> 01:37:15.200] of the judge void.
[01:37:15.200 --> 01:37:19.200] Big, big problems.
[01:37:19.200 --> 01:37:26.200] Now, I can understand sometimes you'll take a little shortcut when it's not important,
[01:37:26.200 --> 01:37:29.200] but did nobody look down the road?
[01:37:29.200 --> 01:37:36.200] You know, I'm bringing this issue in Texas about no order from the magistrate finding
[01:37:36.200 --> 01:37:38.200] probable cause.
[01:37:38.200 --> 01:37:45.200] I just filed 45 criminal complaints against police, sheriff's deputies, for arresting
[01:37:45.200 --> 01:37:48.200] someone and taking them to jail.
[01:37:48.200 --> 01:37:55.200] That standard procedure has been 30 years, but the law says you're supposed to take them
[01:37:55.200 --> 01:38:02.200] to a magistrate and it's absolutely abundantly clear and even the case law supports.
[01:38:02.200 --> 01:38:08.200] So didn't anybody look at the possibility of this?
[01:38:08.200 --> 01:38:12.200] The governor, he issues all of these executive orders.
[01:38:12.200 --> 01:38:17.200] They were horrendously illegal.
[01:38:17.200 --> 01:38:22.200] Absolutely he's forbidden to do that.
[01:38:22.200 --> 01:38:30.200] Do they really think they're immune from any consequences?
[01:38:30.200 --> 01:38:43.200] I don't know, but I've got several votes of office certified from the Secretary of State.
[01:38:43.200 --> 01:38:47.200] That's where you can get a certified copy.
[01:38:47.200 --> 01:38:54.200] The courts will send you one and all of them are shortened.
[01:38:54.200 --> 01:38:57.200] All of them have.
[01:38:57.200 --> 01:38:59.200] Can you look up that oath?
[01:38:59.200 --> 01:39:07.200] The Supreme Court will almost certainly put that together or if there is a shortened version,
[01:39:07.200 --> 01:39:12.200] it would have had to have been approved by the Supreme Court.
[01:39:12.200 --> 01:39:17.200] Even if they did, that's not something a Supreme could do.
[01:39:17.200 --> 01:39:23.200] The legislature would have to fix that.
[01:39:23.200 --> 01:39:26.200] It's my opinion.
[01:39:26.200 --> 01:39:31.200] People look at this, especially people in government, and say, well, that's really nitpicking.
[01:39:31.200 --> 01:39:37.200] And I say absolutely it's nitpicking and that makes it the best thing to take on.
[01:39:37.200 --> 01:39:40.200] You're not saying the judge did something really horrible.
[01:39:40.200 --> 01:39:48.200] He let a child molester go free or let a rapist out and heard of judges doing that.
[01:39:48.200 --> 01:39:51.200] And they get incredible negative feedback.
[01:39:51.200 --> 01:39:53.200] You're not saying something horrible like that.
[01:39:53.200 --> 01:40:01.200] You're saying you're raising a big stink over what they consider to be a very minor thing.
[01:40:01.200 --> 01:40:06.200] That's the best thing we can raise a big stink about.
[01:40:06.200 --> 01:40:13.200] If we can raise this big stink over a minor thing, just think of what we can do if it's something major.
[01:40:13.200 --> 01:40:17.200] And we don't want it to get to something major.
[01:40:17.200 --> 01:40:23.200] We want them to know that we intend to hold them to the letter of the law.
[01:40:23.200 --> 01:40:31.200] And if you think that oath is not important, well, you don't understand contract law.
[01:40:31.200 --> 01:40:42.200] I was just finishing up my lawsuit and I had a section in there where I accused the officer of breach of contract.
[01:40:42.200 --> 01:40:51.200] Breach of the contract he entered into on swearing to his oath, which was a condition of his employment
[01:40:51.200 --> 01:40:57.200] for which he subsequently received monetary renumeration.
[01:40:57.200 --> 01:41:01.200] Contract is not a contract until something of value changes hands.
[01:41:01.200 --> 01:41:05.200] He entered into the contract by swearing to the oath.
[01:41:05.200 --> 01:41:10.200] The oath became a contract when he received payment.
[01:41:10.200 --> 01:41:13.200] Breach of contract.
[01:41:13.200 --> 01:41:18.200] And I was charging a breach of good-facing for a dealing.
[01:41:18.200 --> 01:41:22.200] The oath is important.
[01:41:22.200 --> 01:41:27.200] And it's nice and nitpicking.
[01:41:27.200 --> 01:41:28.200] Exactly where we should go.
[01:41:28.200 --> 01:41:34.200] You know, I don't like going after stuff that's going to ruin somebody's career or get them put in jail.
[01:41:34.200 --> 01:41:38.200] I don't want them to do anything that would ruin their career or get them put in jail.
[01:41:38.200 --> 01:41:41.200] So how do we keep that from happening?
[01:41:41.200 --> 01:41:43.200] Wait till they do something horrible?
[01:41:43.200 --> 01:41:47.200] Nah, we pick up a part on the tiny things.
[01:41:47.200 --> 01:41:49.200] And then you never get to the big ones.
[01:41:49.200 --> 01:41:54.200] And Bob, so far you've been pretty good about that.
[01:41:54.200 --> 01:41:59.200] Well, I found a few little nuggets here and there.
[01:41:59.200 --> 01:42:02.200] Okay.
[01:42:02.200 --> 01:42:08.200] What do you want to do with these officers who did this?
[01:42:08.200 --> 01:42:13.200] Well, of course I wanted all to go away.
[01:42:13.200 --> 01:42:18.200] You're talking about the sobriety test?
[01:42:18.200 --> 01:42:24.200] No, about the officers who stopped you and the way they treated things.
[01:42:24.200 --> 01:42:29.200] Of course you want to take the... did they cite you?
[01:42:29.200 --> 01:42:31.200] Yes.
[01:42:31.200 --> 01:42:34.200] What did they charge you with?
[01:42:34.200 --> 01:42:40.200] One of them was resisting arrest.
[01:42:40.200 --> 01:42:51.200] They tried repeatedly to get me to come out of the car and I wouldn't come out of the car.
[01:42:51.200 --> 01:42:55.200] Doesn't it sound just like patently...
[01:42:55.200 --> 01:43:04.200] It's like they're admitting that there's no reason to arrest you if the charges that they're putting on there is resisting arrest.
[01:43:04.200 --> 01:43:08.200] That's what it looks like to me.
[01:43:08.200 --> 01:43:10.200] There would need to be something else first.
[01:43:10.200 --> 01:43:14.200] They either have an arrest warrant or they had an on-site crime.
[01:43:14.200 --> 01:43:21.200] And if either one of those is there, then why should there even be an arrest?
[01:43:21.200 --> 01:43:22.200] Yeah, exactly.
[01:43:22.200 --> 01:43:26.200] Resisting arrest is an after-the-facts thing.
[01:43:26.200 --> 01:43:32.200] But aren't you under custodial arrest as soon as they pull you over?
[01:43:32.200 --> 01:43:35.200] No.
[01:43:35.200 --> 01:43:40.200] It's just... they call it a characterist stop.
[01:43:40.200 --> 01:43:44.200] And they just pull you over to ask you some questions.
[01:43:44.200 --> 01:43:49.200] That's a little bit complicated under especially code in Texas.
[01:43:49.200 --> 01:43:51.200] We'll talk about that on the other side.
[01:43:51.200 --> 01:43:54.200] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll go to our radio.
[01:43:54.200 --> 01:44:00.200] We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.200 --> 01:44:04.200] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved.
[01:44:04.200 --> 01:44:06.200] Except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.200 --> 01:44:09.200] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:09.200 --> 01:44:11.200] And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.200 --> 01:44:17.200] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.200 --> 01:44:22.200] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:22.200 --> 01:44:25.200] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.200 --> 01:44:31.200] Logo's radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.200 --> 01:44:34.200] We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[01:44:34.200 --> 01:44:39.200] We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.200 --> 01:44:47.200] When you order from Logo's radio network dot com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.200 --> 01:44:51.200] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.200 --> 01:44:58.200] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:58.200 --> 01:45:00.200] Order now.
[01:45:00.200 --> 01:45:03.200] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.200 --> 01:45:10.200] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course
[01:45:10.200 --> 01:45:14.200] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.200 --> 01:45:18.200] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.200 --> 01:45:22.200] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.200 --> 01:45:27.200] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.200 --> 01:45:34.200] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.200 --> 01:45:43.200] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.200 --> 01:45:52.200] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.200 --> 01:46:01.200] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.200 --> 01:46:31.200] Okay, cameras working well. Come on, sing, Jerry, come on.
[01:46:31.200 --> 01:46:37.200] As we sow, so shall we reap.
[01:46:37.200 --> 01:46:44.200] But so many groups of worms have put on hold of me.
[01:46:44.200 --> 01:46:52.200] I need a mountain car, but you're a giant. My steps into giant.
[01:46:52.200 --> 01:46:57.200] But what goes around comes around.
[01:46:57.200 --> 01:47:00.200] So shall we reap.
[01:47:00.200 --> 01:47:07.200] I need money to listen to this song.
[01:47:07.200 --> 01:47:16.200] Come on, people, you're a giant.
[01:47:16.200 --> 01:47:22.200] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Bob in California.
[01:47:22.200 --> 01:47:29.200] And the best place to take these guys on are the details.
[01:47:29.200 --> 01:47:38.200] And the officer pulled you over and, you know, I'm stepping back from a distance and saying the officer pulled you over.
[01:47:38.200 --> 01:47:47.200] He realized who you were and that you had filed criminal charges against other officers.
[01:47:47.200 --> 01:47:53.200] Now he's going to make you pay, but you didn't have anything to arrest you for.
[01:47:53.200 --> 01:47:59.200] Did you say he accused you of using your cell phone?
[01:47:59.200 --> 01:48:01.200] Yes.
[01:48:01.200 --> 01:48:06.200] And you have, you can bring cell records to show that it wasn't used.
[01:48:06.200 --> 01:48:09.200] That's right.
[01:48:09.200 --> 01:48:20.200] And you blow, you blow, you blow his original problem because for the stop out of the water. However, in Texas,
[01:48:20.200 --> 01:48:32.200] I'm not sure how it is in California, but a sheriff's deputy has no power to enforce the Texas Transportation Code.
[01:48:32.200 --> 01:48:40.200] Unless he has been appointed to do so by the County Commissioner's Court and named as a traffic control officer,
[01:48:40.200 --> 01:48:46.200] he is paid by the County Commissioner's Court and rides a motorcycle.
[01:48:46.200 --> 01:48:54.200] The commercial transportation code is intended to be enforced by the state police.
[01:48:54.200 --> 01:49:06.200] And the state police can only enforce the transportation code because each sheriff of each county is the highest level law enforcement
[01:49:06.200 --> 01:49:18.200] person in the county. Nobody else. It was not intended originally that we have a state police.
[01:49:18.200 --> 01:49:23.200] They become a problem. They become a tool for the governor.
[01:49:23.200 --> 01:49:38.200] And exactly what happened during the COVID crisis is the governor took the DPS and turned them into a militia because the only
[01:49:38.200 --> 01:49:44.200] people with guns that the governor has any power over is a militia.
[01:49:44.200 --> 01:49:55.200] The Highway Patrol is the Department of Public Safety are just there to enforce traffic laws and they're under the colonel.
[01:49:55.200 --> 01:50:02.200] But the governor conscripted them into a militia. This is why we don't have state police.
[01:50:02.200 --> 01:50:16.200] We originally didn't have state police. We gave all of the power to the local sheriffs. So do ordinary peace officers have authority to
[01:50:16.200 --> 01:50:25.200] enforce commercial transportation code in California to your knowledge?
[01:50:25.200 --> 01:50:32.200] These were CHPs. So I imagine they have the right to do that.
[01:50:32.200 --> 01:50:44.200] Oh, OK. Does CHP have general policing authority?
[01:50:44.200 --> 01:50:49.200] Because the Department of Public Safety in Texas does not.
[01:50:49.200 --> 01:50:59.200] The administrative code that creates it. They did not intend to create a state police because that would tend to override the county sheriffs.
[01:50:59.200 --> 01:51:11.200] So they gave the state police the authority to enforce the commercial transportation code and the code says the Department of Public Safety
[01:51:11.200 --> 01:51:22.200] shall not enforce the criminal laws except at the request of and under the direction of local law enforcement.
[01:51:22.200 --> 01:51:33.200] How does California keep the California Highway Patrol from becoming a state policing organization?
[01:51:33.200 --> 01:51:42.200] I'll have to look into that. I bet there's some details in there. Otherwise, the sheriffs would have a fit.
[01:51:42.200 --> 01:51:56.200] Because the state police would then come into the counties and tend to take control over the counties and lose the counties themselves would lose their level of sovereignty.
[01:51:56.200 --> 01:52:02.200] There's got to be something in there. The way there is in Texas.
[01:52:02.200 --> 01:52:07.200] I'll take a look. I found it interesting when I called 911.
[01:52:07.200 --> 01:52:15.200] The 911 operator put me over to the seat when they found out that it was a CHP that had me pulled over.
[01:52:15.200 --> 01:52:21.200] Put me through to the CHP 911 operator.
[01:52:21.200 --> 01:52:38.200] And I requested a responder, but I never got a responder, although I had a lieutenant CHP come to the site.
[01:52:38.200 --> 01:52:43.200] Did he come to take your complaint?
[01:52:43.200 --> 01:52:50.200] I should have done that, but I'm a little on the draw.
[01:52:50.200 --> 01:52:57.200] Okay, when I call 911, I want the officer to come and take a criminal accusation against another officer.
[01:52:57.200 --> 01:53:05.200] I generally tell him the officer is agitated. He has a pistol and I'm afraid for my safety.
[01:53:05.200 --> 01:53:13.200] Get someone out here. He's committed official misconduct or in Texas it's official oppression.
[01:53:13.200 --> 01:53:22.200] And I want them to take my criminal complaint. That's what gets them doing this little chicken dance.
[01:53:22.200 --> 01:53:28.200] Where they start shifting from one foot to the other because when you call 911, you're the victim.
[01:53:28.200 --> 01:53:37.200] And they come out to answer your complaint. This lieutenant, you need to really go after him for retaliation.
[01:53:37.200 --> 01:53:40.200] Okay.
[01:53:40.200 --> 01:53:51.200] Randy, I'm going to let you go because I'm sure you have other callers, but I wanted to do the California Constitution Article 10 miscellaneous.
[01:53:51.200 --> 01:54:02.200] Section three is the oath of office that all public employees are supposed to take for anyone out there that might be interested in taking a look at it.
[01:54:02.200 --> 01:54:06.200] Because I'm sure that this is rampant.
[01:54:06.200 --> 01:54:15.200] Well, if it's Constitution, that's something even the legislature can't change.
[01:54:15.200 --> 01:54:30.200] Well, it's here and no other oath, declaration or test shall be required as a qualification for any public office or employment.
[01:54:30.200 --> 01:54:32.200] And no other oath.
[01:54:32.200 --> 01:54:40.200] That should go to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:54:40.200 --> 01:54:47.200] The officer didn't have the power to make the stop in the first place.
[01:54:47.200 --> 01:54:52.200] Okay.
[01:54:52.200 --> 01:54:58.200] All right. Well, if there's nothing else, I'll let you go on to others.
[01:54:58.200 --> 01:55:00.200] Okay. Thank you, Bob.
[01:55:00.200 --> 01:55:01.200] All right, Bob.
[01:55:01.200 --> 01:55:06.200] All right, now we're going to try area code 505.
[01:55:06.200 --> 01:55:12.200] If you are in New Mexico and you have called us, talk to us.
[01:55:12.200 --> 01:55:20.200] You appear to be a first time caller because we don't have a, you're not in our database.
[01:55:20.200 --> 01:55:25.200] Okay, looks like we still don't have it.
[01:55:25.200 --> 01:55:30.200] Okay, we're going to Scott in Michigan. Hello, Scott.
[01:55:30.200 --> 01:55:33.200] Hello, Randy and Brett. How's it going?
[01:55:33.200 --> 01:55:37.200] It's going good. What do you have for us today?
[01:55:37.200 --> 01:55:44.200] Well, it seems like everybody else was kind of talking about threads that are things that I'm interested in right now.
[01:55:44.200 --> 01:55:53.200] I think that means we're becoming unified in our vision if everybody's kind of working the same similar issues here, I think.
[01:55:53.200 --> 01:55:57.200] We did that on purpose, didn't we, Randy?
[01:55:57.200 --> 01:56:02.200] Yeah, we set it up that way.
[01:56:02.200 --> 01:56:23.200] So with the oath, you said that they would be prohibited from, you know, issuing a valid order, but what about, you know, a judge can't hear an arraignment if he doesn't have a valid oath on file, right?
[01:56:23.200 --> 01:56:33.200] Okay, if a judge hasn't met all the requirements for office, then he doesn't hold the office.
[01:56:33.200 --> 01:56:51.200] Okay, in that case, if he's not properly in office, his actions would not be voidable. They would be void once you show that the judge was not properly holding office.
[01:56:51.200 --> 01:56:54.200] That's pretty exciting.
[01:56:54.200 --> 01:56:59.200] Boy, did I have a field day going down to the clerk's office, the county clerk's office.
[01:56:59.200 --> 01:57:06.200] I was surprised to hear the callers say that where you get a certified copy of the oath is from the Secretary of State.
[01:57:06.200 --> 01:57:12.200] I went to the county clerk's office and boy, were they reticent to want to cooperate with me.
[01:57:12.200 --> 01:57:17.200] I mean, I walk in that clerk's lobby now and I can just see him clench up.
[01:57:17.200 --> 01:57:23.200] They don't want to hear any of the questions I'm going to be asking.
[01:57:23.200 --> 01:57:30.200] So they made a big think about it and said, well, we can't give you a certified copy, but they will give you a copy.
[01:57:30.200 --> 01:57:35.200] And, you know, the oath that I collected for my judge was expired.
[01:57:35.200 --> 01:57:38.200] And I think that's a big reason why they didn't want me to see it.
[01:57:38.200 --> 01:57:51.200] They pressed and got it and then went back a couple months later and lo and behold, the judge had renewed his oath a couple days after I was in there asking about it.
[01:57:51.200 --> 01:57:54.200] Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
[01:57:54.200 --> 01:57:57.200] Yeah, right.
[01:57:57.200 --> 01:58:00.200] Okay, we need to talk about this.
[01:58:00.200 --> 01:58:13.200] You know, to reinforce this, the judge needs to be taken on for that. You need to look at all of the cases the judge has heard from the time his oath expired till he renewed it.
[01:58:13.200 --> 01:58:17.200] But there's one more thing to look at.
[01:58:17.200 --> 01:58:28.200] And I have come across issues where the legislature has held that the oath is doesn't expire.
[01:58:28.200 --> 01:58:34.200] They ask them to retake the oath on occasion. They've ruled that the first oath they filed doesn't expire.
[01:58:34.200 --> 01:58:38.200] And that's to keep from having the exact problem you're looking at bringing to them.
[01:58:38.200 --> 01:58:50.200] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rueva Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:58:50.200 --> 01:58:58.200] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.200 --> 01:59:06.200] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.200 --> 01:59:09.200] Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:09.200 --> 01:59:18.200] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.200 --> 01:59:28.200] These difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.200 --> 01:59:33.200] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.200 --> 01:59:44.200] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:44.200 --> 01:59:51.200] or ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.200 --> 02:00:15.200] If you're listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.