ROL_2021-04-09_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.760]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.760 --> 00:13.040]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.040 --> 00:21.360]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.360 --> 00:29.960]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $200.00
[00:29.960 --> 00:41.320]  $27.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.320 --> 00:52.320]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.320 --> 00:57.800]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day parade, killing
[00:57.800 --> 01:04.800]  10 and injuring 40.
[01:04.800 --> 01:05.800]  And recent news.
[01:05.800 --> 01:10.640]  Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing HEP into taxes law back in
[01:10.640 --> 01:15.080]  June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin and San Antonio,
[01:15.080 --> 01:19.120]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they
[01:19.120 --> 01:23.240]  are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the
[01:23.240 --> 01:27.960]  or for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this
[01:27.960 --> 01:32.920]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of
[01:32.920 --> 01:33.920]  the law.
[01:33.920 --> 01:37.600]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.600 --> 01:42.120]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.120 --> 01:48.280]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.280 --> 01:54.480]  well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.480 --> 01:58.960]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:58.960 --> 02:01.800]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.800 --> 02:06.720]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.720 --> 02:10.760]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.760 --> 02:13.480]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.480 --> 02:17.360]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.360 --> 02:22.600]  charged with.
[02:22.600 --> 02:27.240]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark
[02:27.240 --> 02:32.360]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.360 --> 02:38.000]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.000 --> 02:39.500]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.500 --> 02:43.800]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:43.800 --> 02:50.040]  its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.040 --> 02:51.040]  glow.
[02:51.040 --> 02:56.040]  This is Rick Roddy with the Lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[02:56.040 --> 03:22.040]  This is Rick Roddy with the Lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:22.040 --> 03:48.040]  This is Rick Roddy with the Lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:48.040 --> 03:53.520]  You guys heard a little chatter there, we're not getting the signals we should be getting
[03:53.520 --> 03:59.240]  to be sure that I'm actually on the air, and I want Brett, you want to call us on the radio
[03:59.240 --> 04:03.280]  to make sure, on the phone to make sure we're actually going out.
[04:03.280 --> 04:09.800]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, the real of our radio on this, the ninth day
[04:09.800 --> 04:10.800]  of April, 2021.
[04:10.800 --> 04:11.800]  Did I get that right, Brett?
[04:11.800 --> 04:22.000]  You want me to walk, you want me to chew walking and gum what?
[04:22.000 --> 04:23.000]  Absolutely.
[04:23.000 --> 04:32.960]  Okay, I am going to turn the phone lines on, and maybe if I get a call in right away we'll
[04:32.960 --> 04:34.640]  know we're actually up and on the air.
[04:34.640 --> 04:43.920]  There was something I can check, let's check right here, testing one, two, three, check,
[04:43.920 --> 04:46.960]  check, check, okay, I'm getting sound going out, I just don't know if it's going out
[04:46.960 --> 04:47.960]  over the air.
[04:47.960 --> 04:55.680]  Okay, if you're listening, give us a call, and better yet, while we're getting all set
[04:55.680 --> 05:01.640]  up here, I'll just give us a call.
[05:01.640 --> 05:05.080]  It looks like everything's working.
[05:05.080 --> 05:13.000]  Okay, it's working, I got, well, okay, what's up and on, can you hear me on the phone, Brett?
[05:13.000 --> 05:14.000]  Yes.
[05:14.000 --> 05:17.120]  Okay, good, we're working, okay.
[05:17.120 --> 05:21.000]  Now we're up and cooking, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we have our radio on this Friday,
[05:21.000 --> 05:29.640]  the ninth day of April, 2021, and I had an interesting day yesterday.
[05:29.640 --> 05:36.880]  I got trapped down in Cleburne, and I went down there to see if I could help get a woman
[05:36.880 --> 05:44.680]  out of jail, and that happens to be Johnson County, and they kind of know me down there
[05:44.680 --> 05:46.880]  in Johnson County.
[05:46.880 --> 05:52.080]  I haven't bothered them a long time, but the last time I was down there, I kind of give
[05:52.080 --> 05:56.280]  the district clerk and district attorney a hard time.
[05:56.280 --> 06:02.720]  I tried to get the district clerk arrested and presented the district attorney to the
[06:02.720 --> 06:09.960]  grand jury, so I don't get Christmas cards from them.
[06:09.960 --> 06:17.920]  So I went down there and they know I'm present, and I checked their records while I was there.
[06:17.920 --> 06:29.680]  I looked for a order under 16.17 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and I did not find one.
[06:29.680 --> 06:35.600]  I did not find even one.
[06:35.600 --> 06:43.880]  I went up and talked to the assistant district attorney, and he played dumb, he didn't know
[06:43.880 --> 06:50.120]  what I was talking about, and I explained to him what I'm doing, and that I am fixing
[06:50.120 --> 06:57.560]  to unleash a legal firestorm on him for not taking people to magistrates.
[06:57.560 --> 07:01.040]  And told him that, and he said he would talk to his boss.
[07:01.040 --> 07:06.360]  I said, when you talk to him, tell him Randy Countless here, but before you do that, make
[07:06.360 --> 07:15.160]  sure you have some Advil with you, he's probably going to want some.
[07:15.160 --> 07:28.040]  So we will be taking on Johnson County as well, and I'm putting together some software.
[07:28.040 --> 07:35.480]  It turns out, I'm hoping Brett, you can help me with this, a way to streamline bar grievances.
[07:35.480 --> 07:46.240]  I asked him, I was doing something like that, and he didn't want to move forward with it.
[07:46.240 --> 07:50.880]  We could, I guess, give it another shot in a different way.
[07:50.880 --> 07:54.520]  Yeah, I've been looking at how to do that.
[07:54.520 --> 08:04.320]  I've got a spreadsheet that I can merge documents from the spreadsheet, but the bar will not
[08:04.320 --> 08:09.600]  accept emailed bar grievances.
[08:09.600 --> 08:15.080]  So I have about 70 that I'm getting prepared to send.
[08:15.080 --> 08:23.480]  Now I've got 70 cases, I've got about 40 lawyers that I'm going to bar grieve.
[08:23.480 --> 08:27.160]  And I was trying to work out a way to streamline the process.
[08:27.160 --> 08:35.840]  They have a fill in the blanks PDF on their website that you can fill out, but it's long
[08:35.840 --> 08:44.160]  and convoluted and asks for a bunch of garbage that would take a while to put in by hand.
[08:44.160 --> 08:50.360]  But there's no other way to do it with their online system unless I can hack it.
[08:50.360 --> 09:00.400]  But otherwise, I can download their form and create it as a fill in the blanks PDF and
[09:00.400 --> 09:05.080]  then merge the PDF to a database.
[09:05.080 --> 09:06.080]  Then I can add.
[09:06.080 --> 09:08.320]  I've actually done that.
[09:08.320 --> 09:12.360]  I've got that where it actually works that way.
[09:12.360 --> 09:17.280]  But I think I prefer the mail merge way better.
[09:17.280 --> 09:24.040]  What I've done is I took their form, the one that they would give like a paper form, and
[09:24.040 --> 09:28.400]  I made that into a background just for simplicity.
[09:28.400 --> 09:31.920]  There's no text in the document until I put it there.
[09:31.920 --> 09:40.160]  Everything else is their form with a whole bunch of yeah, with a whole bunch of X's in
[09:40.160 --> 09:46.960]  certain places and in a I found out the hard way that they reject their own form.
[09:46.960 --> 09:54.400]  If they reject your bar grievance, if it has only the information that's important
[09:54.400 --> 10:00.960]  and you skipped one of their questions, you have to not only use their form but fill out
[10:00.960 --> 10:01.960]  all the questions.
[10:01.960 --> 10:07.360]  If they find that you missed some question, they throw the whole thing out and it doesn't
[10:07.360 --> 10:08.360]  even count.
[10:08.360 --> 10:09.840]  It doesn't even ding.
[10:09.840 --> 10:11.320]  They don't tell anybody.
[10:11.320 --> 10:13.760]  It doesn't have its intended effect.
[10:13.760 --> 10:23.200]  So, I found out that it still gets exciting if I put their form as a background image
[10:23.200 --> 10:28.160]  and then just put in the few little bits of information I need, mostly just saying, see,
[10:28.160 --> 10:33.880]  attached and then I have one page at the end that has the actual meat of the bar grievance
[10:33.880 --> 10:37.560]  and it's just attached to the end of their nonsense form.
[10:37.560 --> 10:38.960]  It's all fluff.
[10:38.960 --> 10:45.240]  So then when I send that in, I send it into their fax number which they have removed off
[10:45.240 --> 10:52.320]  of the more recent version of their form because I guess they didn't like the idea of receiving
[10:52.320 --> 10:57.280]  it via fax but it's still there and that's still the official fax number so they're just
[10:57.280 --> 11:02.320]  not advertising it like that anymore but you can still send it via fax.
[11:02.320 --> 11:03.320]  So that's what I do.
[11:03.320 --> 11:15.080]  Mine is including a 20 page brief and I was fixing to blow up the fax machine but it
[11:15.080 --> 11:18.960]  cost me $0.10 a page to send to fax.
[11:18.960 --> 11:22.840]  No, use one of those free fax services.
[11:22.840 --> 11:28.560]  My favorite one is called faxzero.com and there are others but that's just the one
[11:28.560 --> 11:32.400]  that I've kind of got a lot taken a liking to.
[11:32.400 --> 11:38.280]  They give you just a certain number of free words a month or is it all free?
[11:38.280 --> 11:46.880]  It is free if you're sending up to three pages at a time and up to five sending per day.
[11:46.880 --> 11:53.400]  So every day I think it's 11 p.m. it resets because they're going on Eastern time so midnight
[11:53.400 --> 11:54.720]  their time.
[11:54.720 --> 12:01.360]  So it resets and you have another five faxes you can send for up to three pages each but
[12:01.360 --> 12:07.920]  then they also have I don't know you can pay them a dollar or two and have some I don't
[12:07.920 --> 12:12.280]  know if it's unlimited or just a larger limit.
[12:12.280 --> 12:20.640]  Okay, if we build this on a website that won't be workable.
[12:20.640 --> 12:22.240]  How can we get these?
[12:22.240 --> 12:25.480]  What have we done?
[12:25.480 --> 12:33.680]  Well, so there's services for that just like the ones that do send you a text as a confirmation
[12:33.680 --> 12:39.400]  for something or you get a multi-factor authentication on your phone.
[12:39.400 --> 12:43.680]  They have also APIs that will talk to fax machines.
[12:43.680 --> 12:48.520]  So you have to sign up for one of those and plug it into your server and then your server
[12:48.520 --> 12:51.520]  can contact those faxing services.
[12:51.520 --> 13:01.400]  I'm trying to fix this so that other people can look in their records like I've got a
[13:01.400 --> 13:09.080]  guy down there in Houston who's being prosecuted and they don't have 16, 17 orders in the record
[13:09.080 --> 13:20.880]  there so I want him to be able to pull the names and then merge the names that he pulls
[13:20.880 --> 13:28.640]  into our system so we can send out lots of these bar grievances.
[13:28.640 --> 13:35.200]  What I'm doing is bar grieving every lawyer I find in the record who represents a criminal
[13:35.200 --> 13:42.240]  client who has not filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction where there is no
[13:42.240 --> 13:47.800]  16, 17 order.
[13:47.800 --> 13:52.880]  These are lawyers that I don't have anything to do with that represented a client a couple
[13:52.880 --> 14:00.560]  of years ago, bar grievance anyway, and then criminal complaints against the officer, TICO
[14:00.560 --> 14:10.160]  complaints against the officer, complaints against the prosecutor and the judge.
[14:10.160 --> 14:17.120]  We just load them up so I'm trying to find a way to get this automated.
[14:17.120 --> 14:20.960]  They won't accept email.
[14:20.960 --> 14:26.280]  I wonder if that's actually the case.
[14:26.280 --> 14:30.280]  If what does the law say about emails?
[14:30.280 --> 14:43.880]  Well for the Texas Civil Rules you can, Rule 21A puts email and fax both on par with hand
[14:43.880 --> 14:52.480]  delivery and certified mail, USPS, it's right there on par with that and it says that when
[14:52.480 --> 14:59.680]  it's been received, when it says when complete it tells when the different ones are complete
[14:59.680 --> 15:08.160]  and fax it says that it's complete upon success and email they don't say anything about when
[15:08.160 --> 15:15.120]  it's complete, they kind of, in my opinion the legislature overlooked saying when email
[15:15.120 --> 15:16.600]  is deemed complete.
[15:16.600 --> 15:19.920]  It may be that email can be verified.
[15:19.920 --> 15:27.800]  Sure it can, I think the same could be said for fax but yes, it's probably even easier
[15:27.800 --> 15:36.680]  to verify because the servers automatically keep logs of that, fax machines are traditionally
[15:36.680 --> 15:43.200]  more isolated, more pockets like one fax machine or fax server will have its own records and
[15:43.200 --> 15:49.760]  then there's no kind of big way to oversee all of that.
[15:49.760 --> 15:55.280]  But yeah, that's what it says, 21A.
[15:55.280 --> 16:07.560]  And I'm wondering if I go on the State Bar Association and I find an email address of
[16:07.560 --> 16:24.640]  someone in the office that receives fax, receives grievances and I email them to them and we
[16:24.640 --> 16:32.640]  can raise the question, can the bar refuse to accept an emailed grievance?
[16:32.640 --> 16:39.600]  Why don't you like to test that out?
[16:39.600 --> 16:45.760]  I can just ask them if there's any reason why they won't, like I'll start from the premise
[16:45.760 --> 16:49.400]  that you're going to receive this and then let them see if they can come up with a reason
[16:49.400 --> 16:51.400]  to not receive it.
[16:51.400 --> 17:00.240]  If I email it, or if you set this up to email, I can get every email you build.
[17:00.240 --> 17:05.560]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[17:05.560 --> 17:09.080]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[17:09.080 --> 17:13.360]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[17:13.360 --> 17:14.360]  can win two.
[17:14.360 --> 17:19.160]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.160 --> 17:20.840]  civil rights statute.
[17:20.840 --> 17:25.600]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and
[17:25.600 --> 17:30.080]  phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial
[17:30.080 --> 17:33.800]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.800 --> 17:38.920]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.920 --> 17:41.080]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:41.080 --> 17:46.600]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner
[17:46.600 --> 17:49.600]  or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[17:49.600 --> 17:59.160]  It's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[17:59.160 --> 18:00.160]  now.
[18:00.160 --> 18:04.640]  The rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law of traffic seminar.
[18:04.640 --> 18:08.240]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[18:08.240 --> 18:12.440]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.440 --> 18:15.400]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to
[18:15.400 --> 18:19.320]  act in our own private capacity and most importantly, the right to do process of law.
[18:19.320 --> 18:23.520]  The traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.520 --> 18:25.400]  our rights through due process.
[18:25.400 --> 18:28.880]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the
[18:28.880 --> 18:32.640]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.640 --> 18:35.040]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:35.040 --> 18:39.040]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:39.040 --> 18:40.360]  ordering your copy today.
[18:40.360 --> 18:43.600]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.600 --> 18:48.120]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:48.120 --> 18:50.440]  documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.440 --> 18:54.400]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.400 --> 19:20.680]  For your copy today and together, we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:24.400 --> 19:43.240]  We're standing like it's out of control on the edge of a hole inside a deep and dark
[19:43.240 --> 20:08.080]  hole inside a deep and dark hole inside a deep and dark hole inside a deep and dark hole
[20:08.080 --> 20:35.560]  inside a deep and dark hole inside a deep and dark hole inside a deep and dark hole
[20:35.560 --> 21:05.120]  inside a deep and dark hole inside a deep and dark hole in a deep and dark hole inside
[21:05.120 --> 21:28.800]  a deep and dark hole inside a deep and dark hole inside a deep and dark hole inside a
[21:28.800 --> 21:58.420]  deep and dark hole in a deep and dark hole in a deep and dark hole in a deep and dark
[21:58.420 --> 22:03.900]  have a server log it's there they can wipe it off everything off their systems
[22:03.900 --> 22:07.700]  and we don't care they're still they cannot get to all of the tracks it please
[22:07.700 --> 22:16.940]  so what if we send one to the do it the the head of the department if you send it
[22:16.940 --> 22:25.580]  to the wrong party then the bar can just send it to the right party I've done
[22:25.580 --> 22:29.140]  that with the state commission on judicial conduct when I send a judicial
[22:29.140 --> 22:34.620]  misconduct complaint sometimes their fax machine doesn't answer and so I'll
[22:34.620 --> 22:40.860]  turn around and now email that same PDF over to Eric Vincent the director
[22:40.860 --> 22:46.780]  executive director of the state commission on judicial conduct well I
[22:46.780 --> 22:53.900]  did that only a few times and I don't really understand why but he left his
[22:53.900 --> 22:59.820]  office he I don't know if he resigned or if he what what happened exactly but he
[22:59.820 --> 23:06.500]  got replaced with somebody else interested term was up mm-hmm he not
[23:06.500 --> 23:17.100]  hitting bar grievance that many times we oh maybe I don't see Ted on the board
[23:17.100 --> 23:23.860]  but I'm hoping he will call in he is you know he's been calling frustrated
[23:23.860 --> 23:28.940]  with how all these things are going but he called me today and he has had a lot
[23:28.940 --> 23:36.580]  of influence that you know he complained about these judges receiving up to $50,000
[23:36.580 --> 23:43.460]  a year from the counties he subsequently found out that since 2018 the
[23:43.460 --> 23:50.860]  counties stopped paying them the judges may not be happy with him he just cost
[23:50.860 --> 24:01.420]  $50,000 a year yeah and one of the retired judges they were using they're
[24:01.420 --> 24:08.140]  not using him anymore that one that he had went after so he's having some
[24:08.140 --> 24:13.660]  effect and that is good news so I'll work on this that the problem with the
[24:13.660 --> 24:22.140]  bar grievance is it's got page after page of of just information stuff and I
[24:22.140 --> 24:27.860]  wanted to be able to truncate the grievance I could made it to him who
[24:27.860 --> 24:35.740]  wasn't so huge right and that makes it a problem and you have if I do it online
[24:35.740 --> 24:40.420]  and I got to go down through all of these pages because every page has got a
[24:40.420 --> 24:46.940]  spot or two where you have to put something in it and some of it web form
[24:46.940 --> 24:53.700]  because then you don't have your own copy of exactly what did you send it does
[24:53.700 --> 25:03.100]  send you a report that has all the feels in it hmm they might have just fixed
[25:03.100 --> 25:08.260]  that because that's I've never seen that before but it sent me it showed me a
[25:08.260 --> 25:16.420]  report and I I did I did a copy paste to a word document and then when I clicked
[25:16.420 --> 25:22.580]  off of it it said that a report had been sent to my email but I don't remember
[25:22.580 --> 25:26.900]  seeing it in my email yeah I'm with you about that form it's it's fluffy
[25:26.900 --> 25:31.380]  nonsense it's got in Texas we have six pages I don't know probably in a lot of
[25:31.380 --> 25:36.100]  places I've seen some have only two pages or even one and a half but we've
[25:36.100 --> 25:40.100]  got six pages and it's nothing it's nonsense it's just a whole bunch of
[25:40.100 --> 25:45.100]  stuff about why did you hire this lawyer and how much did you pay this lawyer and
[25:45.100 --> 25:48.420]  you have to fill it all in if you leave any of them blank because they don't
[25:48.420 --> 25:54.220]  really apply I've never met that lawyer whatever you know I didn't hire him I
[25:54.220 --> 25:57.540]  don't know who hired him I didn't hire him he's just button his head in the
[25:57.540 --> 26:01.420]  middle of my business I don't want him in here I'm bargaining because he's he's
[26:01.420 --> 26:07.060]  being you know this is baritry but what if we what if we took out all of the
[26:07.060 --> 26:16.060]  explanations and all of the fluff and just sent them one with only the content
[26:16.060 --> 26:21.580]  that needs to be put in it I did that early on they rejected it I don't know
[26:21.580 --> 26:24.740]  if they would still do that but they were rejecting it saying I have to use
[26:24.740 --> 26:30.180]  their form so instead of my one page that's nice and succinct and has just
[26:30.180 --> 26:34.620]  the things that they need just the part that you know the content like you said
[26:34.620 --> 26:39.540]  but they rejected it they said no you're gonna have to use our form we're not
[26:39.540 --> 26:44.180]  even gonna evaluate this it doesn't even go into our queue you know how then we
[26:44.180 --> 26:48.980]  filed criminally against them for official misconduct
[26:49.980 --> 26:58.020]  that sounds appropriate they are a quasi-governmental agency and quasi's
[26:58.020 --> 27:07.660]  enough here's your quasi-criminal complaint okay I'm gonna look into that
[27:07.660 --> 27:12.740]  because what I'm doing is I'm looking in the public record and if I don't see a
[27:12.740 --> 27:18.540]  sixteen point one seven order the order that a magistrate must produce when he
[27:18.540 --> 27:25.060]  finishes a examining trial under seventeen point three oh he's required to
[27:25.060 --> 27:29.140]  seal everything hey all the ant documents had in the hearing in an envelope
[27:29.140 --> 27:33.340]  cause his name to be written across the seal of the envelope and forward it to
[27:33.340 --> 27:39.140]  the clerk of the court of jurisdiction now that is very clear in code that's
[27:39.140 --> 27:46.060]  statutory due process not due process is not the word it's a statutory
[27:46.060 --> 27:54.940]  prescription does not say he may matter can if he wants to so I expect to see
[27:54.940 --> 27:58.940]  that order in the record if I don't see that order in the record and obviously
[27:58.940 --> 28:06.220]  no examining trial ever occurred so I have reason to believe and do believe
[28:06.220 --> 28:10.700]  that the person was denied an examining trial and if there's evidence that he
[28:10.700 --> 28:17.180]  was taken to jail for instance if there is evidence of an indictment in the
[28:17.180 --> 28:24.580]  record then he must necessarily have been arrested as there can be no evidence
[28:24.580 --> 28:29.180]  of an indictment in the record until someone's been arrested there can be
[28:29.180 --> 28:33.660]  an indictment but it can't go in the record until they've been arrested it
[28:33.660 --> 28:43.380]  specifically says don't put it in there yet yeah the 20 it used to be 20 21 said
[28:43.380 --> 28:47.740]  the the foreman shall come before the court or the clerk with a quorum of the
[28:47.740 --> 28:54.900]  grand jury president read the fact of the two bill into the record 20 22 says if
[28:54.900 --> 29:00.620]  the accused has not been arrested the clerk may I said and the clerk shall
[29:00.620 --> 29:07.100]  make notes in the minutes of the court 22 says if the person hasn't been
[29:07.100 --> 29:11.100]  arrested the clerk cannot make notes of the minutes of the court she must issue
[29:11.100 --> 29:17.620]  a capious and enter the minutes into the notes in the minutes of the court
[29:17.620 --> 29:21.060]  once the person's been arrested and I'm maintaining that's because that gives
[29:21.060 --> 29:26.140]  them opportunity to enter exculpatory evidence but they're not buying that
[29:26.140 --> 29:33.700]  story yet but if the record is not there somebody necessarily did something
[29:33.700 --> 29:43.780]  wrong and I was working on a brief on that that will go with each filing and
[29:43.780 --> 29:50.100]  it's 58 pages long at this point I gotta squeeze it down easier to do with
[29:50.100 --> 29:55.140]  email okay one of us one of our sponsors you'll pick up go to college and come
[29:55.140 --> 29:59.620]  back when you count Brett some you'll be right back
[30:01.460 --> 30:05.700]  it's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work but have they
[30:05.700 --> 30:09.300]  negatively affected our health I'm Dr. Cameron Albright and I'll be back in
[30:09.300 --> 30:13.420]  just a moment with new findings about how cell phones may actually alter our
[30:13.420 --> 30:18.900]  brain chemistry privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself
[30:18.900 --> 30:23.140]  you'll never get it back again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your
[30:23.140 --> 30:28.300]  freedoms will start to vanish too so protect your rights say no to surveillance
[30:28.300 --> 30:33.380]  and keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging on to this
[30:33.380 --> 30:37.460]  public service announcement is brought to you by start page dot com the private
[30:37.460 --> 30:43.860]  search engine alternative to Google yahoo and Bing start over with start page
[30:43.860 --> 30:48.740]  cell phones emit radio frequency energy it's a fact but whether it's dangerous
[30:48.740 --> 30:52.020]  to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been
[30:52.020 --> 30:55.860]  disputed some have blamed it for brain tumors while cell phone companies have
[30:55.860 --> 31:00.100]  downplayed concerns well now the journal of the American Medical Association is
[31:00.100 --> 31:04.780]  confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry the study of 47 volunteers
[31:04.780 --> 31:08.620]  showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest to the cell
[31:08.620 --> 31:12.620]  phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on while researchers aren't
[31:12.620 --> 31:17.100]  sure whether this exposure causes damage I'm not taking any chances I always
[31:17.100 --> 31:21.580]  keep the phone far from my body and I use a corded headset I'm Dr. Catherine
[31:21.580 --> 31:26.580]  Albright more news and information at Catherine Albright dot-com
[31:26.580 --> 31:35.860]  I lost my son my nephew my son on September 11th 2001 most people don't
[31:35.860 --> 31:40.500]  know that a third tower fell on September 11 World Trade Center 7 a 47
[31:40.500 --> 31:44.660]  story skyscraper was not hit by a plane although the official explanation is
[31:44.660 --> 31:49.500]  that fire brought down building seven over 1200 architects and engineers has
[31:49.500 --> 31:53.100]  looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story bring justice
[31:53.100 --> 31:58.860]  to my son my uncle my nephew my son go to building what or why it fell why it
[31:58.860 --> 32:04.020]  matters as what you can do logos radio network welcomes a new show to our
[32:04.020 --> 32:08.380]  lineup for the new year scripture talk with Nana will begin Wednesday
[32:08.380 --> 32:13.740]  January 8th from 8 to 10 p.m. central time our goal is in accord with Matthew
[32:13.740 --> 32:18.900]  516 let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and
[32:18.900 --> 32:23.780]  glorify your father which is in heaven we wish to reflect God's light and be a
[32:23.780 --> 32:28.780]  blessing to all those with a hearing ear join Nana and guests for both verse by
[32:28.780 --> 32:33.340]  verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love
[32:33.340 --> 32:38.300]  and good works our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew
[32:38.300 --> 32:42.900]  where we will discuss one chapter per week our topical Bible studies will
[32:42.900 --> 32:47.340]  vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character
[32:47.340 --> 32:52.380]  development so mark your calendar and join us live on bogus radio network
[32:52.380 --> 32:58.060]  comm Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring and
[32:58.060 --> 33:02.060]  motivating discussion of the scriptures
[33:02.780 --> 33:11.660]  you're listening to the logos radio network at logos radio network
[33:11.660 --> 33:22.340]  yeah I got a warrant and I'm gonna solve them to the head of a man them
[33:22.340 --> 33:42.460]  so
[33:43.600 --> 33:51.660]  years k we are back telling red sound move our radio and we're going to a college
[33:51.660 --> 33:57.420]  College was going to go to Mary in Texas. Mary, what do you have for us today?
[33:59.740 --> 34:05.820]  I know who you can sue if you lose a lawsuit to a dirty lawyer.
[34:07.740 --> 34:12.540]  Okay, who? State of Texas. I'll fight. The State Bar? The State Bar?
[34:13.740 --> 34:19.420]  Does they act like they're responsible for all these guys and they promise equity in the court
[34:19.420 --> 34:25.100]  and fair access to law and all this? The State Bar needs to be sued every time somebody lost
[34:25.100 --> 34:29.580]  a lawsuit to a dirty lawyer. That is a very good point.
[34:33.500 --> 34:39.580]  But you know, I will add that when I bill my lawsuit, I will add that to it.
[34:41.740 --> 34:45.420]  These guys are protecting them. They're protecting these criminals,
[34:45.420 --> 34:50.380]  and they need to be sued, and I guess that means the State can be sued on any bad lawsuit.
[34:51.180 --> 34:58.940]  Yeah, what I'm claiming is, is that the lawyer is acting in concert and collusion with the
[34:58.940 --> 35:06.540]  prosecuting attorney and the police and the courts. By not challenging the subject manager of
[35:06.540 --> 35:17.980]  such a court, where there is no 16-17 order, the lawyer is not giving good faith in fair services.
[35:19.340 --> 35:25.100]  And he's doing that, acting in concert and collusion with the police and the prosecutors,
[35:25.100 --> 35:31.100]  in order to force someone accused of crime into taking a deal. And the scheme is working.
[35:31.100 --> 35:42.780]  Because the average conviction rate in the state of Texas is 99.6, and the incarceration rate per
[35:42.780 --> 35:55.660]  capita in Texas, the United States is the highest on planet Earth at 657, highest country on planet
[35:55.660 --> 36:12.460]  Earth. Texas houses, that's 657 per 100,000. Texas houses 750 per 100,000. Russia houses
[36:13.260 --> 36:25.100]  357 per 100,000. We're not just the worst police state on planet Earth. We are the worst police
[36:25.100 --> 36:34.300]  state by far. And it is my position that a great portion of this problem is caused by the fact
[36:34.300 --> 36:42.300]  that the police do not take accused to magistrates, the way the law specifically commands.
[36:46.780 --> 36:49.100]  Okay. I'm going to quick preach you down there.
[36:49.100 --> 36:56.060]  Having a drug corridor, having a drug corridor in the center of the state,
[36:57.420 --> 37:02.380]  yeah, having a drug corridor in the center of the state doesn't help going from Mexico to Canada
[37:02.380 --> 37:07.180]  and being a port as well. There's a lot of stuff that goes down in the state of Texas.
[37:08.540 --> 37:13.980]  Okay. You're talking about NAFTA Highway, I-35?
[37:13.980 --> 37:20.780]  You're talking about the interstate, yeah, interstate Highway 35 that Texas has a lot of dirty
[37:20.780 --> 37:27.900]  business here. Well, that's nothing. Now, Biden's bringing people up from the border down in Mexico,
[37:27.900 --> 37:31.660]  bringing them by the busload and dropping them off at big cities.
[37:33.740 --> 37:38.060]  Dealing up local motels with them, paid by the government.
[37:38.060 --> 37:46.780]  That's why they unbanned a homeless camping thing, so that we would buy all these hotels
[37:46.780 --> 37:51.180]  for these homeless and now all the aliens are going to go out those hotels.
[37:55.340 --> 38:00.620]  Aliens are not going to hotels. Citizens are going to go to the camps and the, oh,
[38:00.620 --> 38:08.380]  I'm sorry, yeah, the aliens would go to the hotels and all the citizens would wind up in the camps.
[38:08.380 --> 38:15.020]  Well, whoever they are, we're doing it in conjunction with this open border thing, but
[38:17.420 --> 38:23.740]  you know, why it happens in Texas, there's a lot to be said, but I'm telling you on any suit
[38:23.740 --> 38:31.660]  that State Bar protects these crooks and they are liable for anything.
[38:31.660 --> 38:38.620]  That's a really good point. And I will look at, I'm preparing a lawsuit against the lawyers,
[38:39.420 --> 38:43.580]  well, against the whole state and everything. I'm suing the county I live in for this
[38:43.580 --> 38:54.940]  particular issue. And this 58-page brief I've got here is really just a part of the overall brief.
[38:56.620 --> 39:04.620]  I will be taking this part of it, adding it to the lawsuit itself. This is just an act,
[39:04.620 --> 39:14.780]  criminal affidavit. It'll be a very large lawsuit and I will be naming everybody,
[39:14.780 --> 39:20.860]  the police, and primarily I'm going to name everybody personally. If I named the bar,
[39:24.780 --> 39:31.660]  Brett, could I get away with naming the president of the bar?
[39:31.660 --> 39:35.260]  Yeah, I would go for that executive director.
[39:36.940 --> 39:40.780]  After it fails, after your suit fails, then go to the bar, honey.
[39:44.220 --> 39:44.780]  Say what?
[39:46.540 --> 39:50.860]  After the suit fails, then go to the bar, don't go to the dance supreme court.
[39:52.300 --> 40:00.140]  Oh, I'm setting up this, I'll go to the supreme, but I'm setting this up to lead me to a federal
[40:00.140 --> 40:05.900]  RICO. I want them to screw up everything on this lawsuit.
[40:08.460 --> 40:10.860]  Well, make the state bar pay for the damages.
[40:11.740 --> 40:14.540]  Yeah, we can sue them in the RICO.
[40:16.620 --> 40:22.780]  Well, maybe after it fails, give it all the evidence and trial and then put it on them.
[40:24.140 --> 40:30.060]  That's the point. I do it in the state and give the state
[40:30.060 --> 40:36.860]  opportunity to screw up everything. And it has been my experience that the state is very
[40:36.860 --> 40:43.020]  accommodating in that regard. If you give them the opportunity to screw things up,
[40:43.820 --> 40:51.580]  they will, you can always depend on to do that. So I'm setting this up to give them the opportunity
[40:51.580 --> 41:01.340]  to rule badly on my motions and pleadings so that I can then take them all to the feds. So
[41:01.340 --> 41:07.500]  an ongoing endemic criminal conspiracy involving the whole criminal justice system.
[41:09.900 --> 41:17.500]  Then if I can get you, Mary in Austin, to look in the record. Now, if you look in the record in
[41:17.500 --> 41:27.820]  Austin, you will find 16, 17 orders. I think you'll also, there's Travis County and Bear County.
[41:27.820 --> 41:36.540]  There are a few, they call them, oh, they have a name for counties that do this. There are a few
[41:36.540 --> 41:42.540]  counties that actually do this, but none of them actually do examining trials. I know that about
[41:42.540 --> 41:49.820]  Travis County because they arrested there several times. They do the registration. They're using
[41:49.820 --> 41:57.740]  the registration in place of the examining trial. So in one of these jurisdictions where they do
[41:57.740 --> 42:09.500]  have an order, then we go look at the process of when it was done and who did it. And what
[42:09.500 --> 42:16.860]  they're doing is a registration. And this registration thing they do is only authorized
[42:17.660 --> 42:24.780]  if someone is arrested for an onsite offense out of the county of original jurisdiction
[42:25.980 --> 42:31.180]  or if they're arrested on a warrant out of the county of original jurisdiction.
[42:32.540 --> 42:36.700]  In that case, they can take them to an out of county magistrate.
[42:36.700 --> 42:42.700]  And the out of county magistrate can't effectively hold an examining trial when all the witnesses
[42:42.700 --> 42:47.900]  are in the county. So he just can give these warnings. And then when the person gets back
[42:47.900 --> 42:51.980]  to the county of original jurisdiction, he has right to examine trial in that county.
[42:53.660 --> 42:57.900]  So they're just doing the registration like the guy's been arrested out of county when he was
[42:57.900 --> 43:03.740]  arrested out on the street in front of the courthouse. So even if they have a 16, 17 order,
[43:03.740 --> 43:11.740]  we still have a way to get at them. And when we start filing T. Cole complaints against every
[43:11.740 --> 43:16.380]  officer who arrests someone and takes them straight to the jail instead of contacting a
[43:16.380 --> 43:25.580]  magistrate and getting permission from a magistrate, these police officers will have a coronary
[43:25.580 --> 43:33.020]  and they'll stop doing it. There's nothing in the law preventing them from doing that.
[43:35.260 --> 43:43.180]  Law action specifically commands them to. So even if the boss don't tell them to,
[43:44.620 --> 43:48.140]  Grant is the one that gave me this argument and I'll speak to that a little bit when you get
[43:48.140 --> 43:52.620]  back on the other side. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, I'll call in number one.
[43:52.620 --> 44:04.940]  512-646-1984. Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the
[44:04.940 --> 44:10.460]  area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed
[44:10.460 --> 44:17.500]  all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.500 --> 44:22.620]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[44:22.620 --> 44:28.460]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logo radio network gets many requests to endorse
[44:28.460 --> 44:35.020]  all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity so much. We became a
[44:35.020 --> 44:40.940]  marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from
[44:40.940 --> 44:48.380]  logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize
[44:48.380 --> 44:53.980]  the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience
[44:53.980 --> 45:01.660]  improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. Are you the
[45:01.660 --> 45:07.500]  plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.500 --> 45:14.860]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.500 --> 45:20.780]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[45:20.780 --> 45:26.620]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now
[45:26.620 --> 45:33.180]  you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning
[45:33.180 --> 45:38.940]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:38.940 --> 45:44.540]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[45:44.540 --> 45:52.220]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.220 --> 46:03.740]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.220 --> 46:45.980]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Fountain Rule Our Radio, and we're talking to Miss Mary.
[46:45.980 --> 46:54.300]  Mary, that is a great idea. Soon the bar. Well, it was me and Mike's secret plan,
[46:54.300 --> 46:59.900]  and my secret plan for a while, and then the backup plan was to do screenplays on all the drama I've
[46:59.900 --> 47:05.420]  had to go through on this or that issue. So, you know, the back... Well, if you do that now,
[47:05.420 --> 47:09.580]  because if you get on YouTube and tell the truth, they'll kick you right off.
[47:09.580 --> 47:18.620]  Oh, I know. Look, I just got off the toll road. How do I do these toll roads, guys? We've been
[47:18.620 --> 47:23.340]  trying to keep them from coming to Austin. Now they're here. I actually got jailed one time
[47:23.340 --> 47:28.780]  about 10 years ago when I was doing a vote rescue project, and apparently that's been in my
[47:28.780 --> 47:35.100]  license. Now, this is probably 10 years ago now, but how do I keep these bills coming in from these
[47:35.100 --> 47:40.460]  toll roads? I don't use them that much, and if they had coin booths, I'd be paying my coins and stuff,
[47:40.460 --> 47:48.780]  but I don't really want to get a text tag. Yeah, I've got a $200 toll tag bill from...
[47:49.580 --> 47:55.820]  I turned it the wrong place, and when I got in it, I realized it was a... went into the toll road.
[47:55.820 --> 48:00.620]  There wasn't any sign showing that, and there was no way I could get out of it. And it was one toll,
[48:00.620 --> 48:06.140]  and now they're wanting to collect $200 and something. Just one of the things I hadn't had
[48:06.140 --> 48:12.780]  time to take on is to sue them for that. Is this like Michael Maris? Is this a Michael Maris thing,
[48:12.780 --> 48:23.340]  maybe? No, no. Michael has retired from this altogether. He don't do the debt collection
[48:23.340 --> 48:31.820]  anymore either, so we need another debt collection. Keep that, Randy. Keep that, Randy. You're doing
[48:31.820 --> 48:39.420]  a great job. What did you do to our governor anyways to make him drop the face masking thing and all
[48:39.420 --> 48:49.500]  that? Oh, he dropped all of that. What did you do to him? I filed a 150-page criminal complaint
[48:49.500 --> 48:55.180]  against him in the same week that the grand jury got it. He dropped all of those executive orders.
[48:56.060 --> 49:01.100]  Now, I don't know that my criminal complaint going to the grand jury did that,
[49:02.220 --> 49:07.740]  but I sure like to think it did. And so far, 18 states have followed suit.
[49:10.140 --> 49:17.420]  Well, that's the same week. Apparently, he wrote a bill. I don't think it passed. I don't know,
[49:17.420 --> 49:24.620]  but Alice was talking about it. And I was supposed to provide extra power so the governor could
[49:24.620 --> 49:30.940]  mandate maybe a medical or any type of closure and that he could also force vaccines.
[49:31.660 --> 49:36.300]  And I don't know what to do about that bill. That was actually in my complaint,
[49:38.940 --> 49:45.660]  where I alleged that the governor had the authority to call the legislature into special
[49:45.660 --> 49:56.300]  session and direct them to consider specific legislation. But he didn't do that. Now that
[49:56.300 --> 50:01.260]  we get in front of a grand jury and he drops everything, now he's doing what he should have
[50:01.260 --> 50:10.620]  done in the first place. That was what our founders intended. And just like you said, Mary,
[50:10.620 --> 50:17.980]  it's not going anywhere. The legislators are not going to give him that power.
[50:19.900 --> 50:27.340]  He's asking the legislators to give him the power to bypass the legislators. Good
[50:27.340 --> 50:36.540]  luck with that. It's not going to happen. All of these orders he issued, he could have and should
[50:36.540 --> 50:43.980]  have called a special session in the legislature and asked him to consider these orders as
[50:43.980 --> 50:50.220]  legislation. They could have put it in as temporary legislation just like his order did.
[50:51.100 --> 50:57.020]  And it would have been legal, but it would have also been subject to constitutional challenges
[50:58.460 --> 51:03.660]  just like his orders were so that if they were bad orders, they could be fixed.
[51:03.660 --> 51:10.300]  The judiciary could weigh in on it and he would not violate the separation of powers.
[51:12.220 --> 51:21.580]  In constructing and researching that complaint, it became clear that the number one terror of our
[51:21.580 --> 51:31.420]  founders was the president. They had to have one, but they feared the president more than any other
[51:31.420 --> 51:38.940]  person because he was the one person likely to attempt to take over the government.
[51:40.220 --> 51:44.620]  So they put very clear restrictions in his place. And in the state,
[51:45.420 --> 51:49.980]  the governor stands in the shoes of the US president and the Fed.
[51:51.740 --> 51:59.500]  They were most concerned about him extending his power and put serious restrictions on that.
[51:59.500 --> 52:06.460]  And never let a good crisis go to waste. The governor just ignored all those
[52:06.460 --> 52:10.060]  restrictions and extended his power.
[52:13.180 --> 52:17.820]  What is the likelihood that the legislature are going to say,
[52:17.820 --> 52:25.820]  sure, governor, we'll give you the power to ignore us and bypass us and bypass the courts
[52:25.820 --> 52:29.980]  and just do whatever you want to? Yeah, good luck with that, Bubba.
[52:33.420 --> 52:37.900]  What I'll do for that 150-page document, you haven't posted anywhere?
[52:39.020 --> 52:45.180]  Yeah, it's on real-world radio. Just go on the front page right there on the front. It's also on
[52:46.220 --> 52:52.300]  jurismprudence.website. And I will be putting it on one of my new sites,
[52:52.300 --> 52:57.180]  ProSafeFromHell.com. One of my listeners got that for me.
[52:58.940 --> 53:02.860]  Roy out of Gainesville.
[53:05.340 --> 53:09.820]  There's Ian Sherman of Gainesville. He's up there somewhere.
[53:09.820 --> 53:16.380]  Hey, I love you guys. I really appreciate y'all and love your mama and, you know, all that.
[53:16.380 --> 53:22.780]  And unfortunately, my mom passed away last Wednesday.
[53:24.460 --> 53:29.340]  I'm sorry. She was determined to make a hundred. She didn't quite make it.
[53:31.260 --> 53:36.620]  So I'm going to head up this weekend and we're going to bury my mom. That's a big loss.
[53:38.940 --> 53:39.740]  She was a hoot.
[53:39.740 --> 53:50.220]  I went, she had a stroke and I went up to Tennessee to see her. And when I walked in the
[53:50.220 --> 53:56.620]  room, she really looked in bad shape. Her face was all drooping on one side and she was quite
[53:56.620 --> 54:02.060]  as a ghost. And they said she hadn't slept for two days. And when I walked in, the caregiver said,
[54:02.940 --> 54:08.140]  the son is someone's here to see you. Do you know who this is? And she looked up at me and she
[54:08.140 --> 54:17.180]  looked confused. And I said, I'm your favorite son. And she looked at me and she said, Donald,
[54:18.460 --> 54:27.180]  no mom, you got your two memory loss. I had to keep reminding you. And she just cackled.
[54:29.100 --> 54:36.780]  She got me. She's having a stroke. She's in horrible shape. And she nailed me righteous.
[54:36.780 --> 54:44.140]  That was my mom. So we're going to miss it. Anyway, okay.
[54:48.140 --> 54:50.860]  And if I don't sound like I'm terribly mournful,
[54:52.460 --> 55:03.340]  it's because she had a great life. If only her children, grandchildren, great grandchildren,
[55:03.340 --> 55:12.780]  great, great, great grandchildren, and one more layer. She's got six generations
[55:14.460 --> 55:20.460]  of family around her. You could go in a little worse circumstances.
[55:23.820 --> 55:29.260]  Okay, go ahead, Mary. What else do you have for us? It's been a while since you've been calling me.
[55:29.260 --> 55:34.300]  Keep going all night. I can keep going all night, but I'll let other people get a chance with you.
[55:36.220 --> 55:42.460]  Okay. Thank you, Mary. And don't be a stranger. That is a good idea you gave me.
[55:43.180 --> 55:45.900]  I'm going to add that suit against the bar to the mix.
[55:47.660 --> 55:52.300]  I've saved it for last. I don't know. You put it where you want. I would do it another. I would
[55:52.300 --> 55:59.180]  do it a whole separate thing. Make it a whole separate tour. Well, I want to bring them all
[55:59.180 --> 56:08.540]  into one large state suit. But what I'm going to do is build this suit so that it is generic.
[56:08.540 --> 56:17.980]  We're always arguing the same issue with a variant. The issue is no examining trial.
[56:19.340 --> 56:23.420]  And we're demonstrating these are the problems you create for yourself
[56:23.420 --> 56:29.740]  when you fail to hold an examining trial. Let me give you a quick example.
[56:30.860 --> 56:35.180]  They fail you to take you directly to the nearest magistrate.
[56:36.860 --> 56:40.140]  And in doing so, they deny you in a number of rights.
[56:41.900 --> 56:49.580]  Find the right. Here we go. If they don't take you to the magistrate, they have a section here
[56:49.580 --> 56:59.340]  of article 213. Direct authorizes a policeman to arrest someone. It is the duty of every
[56:59.340 --> 57:05.260]  peace officer to preserve the peace within the officer's jurisdiction. To affect this purpose,
[57:05.260 --> 57:13.020]  the officer shall use all awful means. Paragraph B, the officer shall in every case
[57:13.020 --> 57:19.580]  authorized by the provisions of this code interfere without warrant to prevent and suppress crime.
[57:20.460 --> 57:27.260]  Execute all awful processes, process issued to the officer by any magistrate or court.
[57:29.740 --> 57:38.460]  Three, give notice to some magistrate of all offenses within the officer's jurisdiction.
[57:38.460 --> 57:46.220]  What part of that is hard to understand? Give notice to some magistrate. Well, you can do that.
[57:47.260 --> 57:57.820]  By failing to do that, if you go down to he, you're a stitching okay. By failing to do that,
[57:58.700 --> 58:06.620]  he almost went off the cliff. I'm pure the bumper music. In chapter 16, there's a whole
[58:06.620 --> 58:12.380]  bunch of things they must do. And each one of those is the right. And by not holding that,
[58:12.380 --> 58:15.980]  they denied it. And each one of these rights and I walked down the whole list of them. Let me come back.
[58:18.140 --> 58:24.060]  Thank you, Mary. We will move ahead when we turn back on the other side. This is Randy Kelkin,
[58:24.060 --> 58:32.940]  Brett Fountain, Real World Radio, our call in number 512-646-1984. We have a couple
[58:32.940 --> 58:39.020]  slots on the call board. So if you have a question or comment, give us a call. We'll be taking your
[58:39.020 --> 58:52.460]  calls all night. Hang on. We'll be right back. Would you like to make more definite progress
[58:52.460 --> 58:58.700]  in your walk with God? Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free
[58:58.700 --> 59:03.260]  Christian books that can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most
[59:03.260 --> 59:08.940]  comprehensive study Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands
[59:08.940 --> 59:14.380]  of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a
[59:14.380 --> 59:20.220]  three-volume set called basic elements of the Christian life. Chapter by chapter, basic elements
[59:20.220 --> 59:26.540]  of the Christian life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build
[59:26.540 --> 59:32.860]  up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the Christian
[59:32.860 --> 01:00:00.620]  life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:00.620 --> 01:00:04.380]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Low Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.300 --> 01:00:12.460]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019, open with precious metals, gold at $1,429
[01:00:12.460 --> 01:00:20.780]  an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.780 --> 01:00:32.060]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $227.26,
[01:00:32.060 --> 01:00:41.420]  XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:41.420 --> 01:00:52.380]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a tying suitcase bomb, was detonated
[01:00:52.380 --> 01:00:58.220]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and
[01:00:58.220 --> 01:01:08.460]  injuring 40. Today in history. And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325,
[01:01:08.460 --> 01:01:13.660]  legalizing hemp into taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston,
[01:01:13.660 --> 01:01:17.820]  Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to
[01:01:17.820 --> 01:01:22.300]  file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:01:22.300 --> 01:01:27.100]  equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney,
[01:01:27.100 --> 01:01:31.180]  announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of
[01:01:31.180 --> 01:01:36.300]  marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney
[01:01:36.300 --> 01:01:41.020]  General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has
[01:01:41.020 --> 01:01:45.980]  not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how
[01:01:45.980 --> 01:01:53.580]  HB 1325 works, as well as other cities too, like the district attorney in El Paso, Caima Esparza,
[01:01:53.580 --> 01:01:58.620]  a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect
[01:01:58.620 --> 01:02:03.980]  on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue was succinctly summarized by
[01:02:03.980 --> 01:02:08.620]  Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote,
[01:02:08.620 --> 01:02:13.260]  the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.260 --> 01:02:17.820]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches with their charged
[01:02:17.820 --> 01:02:27.180]  with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark,
[01:02:27.180 --> 01:02:32.700]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark
[01:02:32.700 --> 01:02:38.380]  ever captured or recorded, with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific
[01:02:38.380 --> 01:02:43.500]  Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland
[01:02:43.500 --> 01:02:50.380]  near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:50.380 --> 01:03:00.380]  This was Book Roadie with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:20.380 --> 01:03:39.580]  Okay, we are back in Calton-Bretts Mountain Roodle
[01:03:39.580 --> 01:03:45.020]  Radio and we're talking to Mary in Texas. Mary, are we done with you? Do you have anything else for us?
[01:03:45.020 --> 01:03:54.220]  One last question, Brett, were you saying that the bar grievance form is filled out by saying
[01:03:54.220 --> 01:04:03.820]  the attachment worked? Yes, that is working for me. So I fell in all of their long six pages.
[01:04:03.820 --> 01:04:11.260]  In Texas, we have six pages, but I fell all of that in with N slash A and I don't know.
[01:04:11.260 --> 01:04:16.700]  And even on the gender thing, I used to have that checked as mail, but then I just put,
[01:04:16.700 --> 01:04:20.300]  I checked both of them because I want the document to be usable by other people.
[01:04:20.860 --> 01:04:26.540]  So let them figure it out. Why do they care? I checked both boxes and I put,
[01:04:26.540 --> 01:04:32.540]  I don't know, on almost everything in there and C attached. So then I've got my one sheet in the
[01:04:32.540 --> 01:04:37.580]  back. So Brett, am I to understand that you have a problem with gender confusion?
[01:04:37.580 --> 01:04:42.380]  You know, Facebook has 72 different options, right?
[01:04:43.660 --> 01:04:50.380]  That's for gender? Yes. I don't see that slowing down anytime soon. So why not check both boxes?
[01:04:53.980 --> 01:05:01.020]  Anyway, the six pages I have taken that and I did get away with
[01:05:01.020 --> 01:05:09.340]  taking the half of page five and half of page six because it's a lot of wasted space
[01:05:09.900 --> 01:05:15.340]  and I collapsed it into one page and they haven't argued about that. So now I'm only
[01:05:15.340 --> 01:05:21.980]  faxing six pages instead of seven and that works out good because that means I can,
[01:05:22.700 --> 01:05:26.860]  in any two-day period, I can, I can bargain with more people.
[01:05:26.860 --> 01:05:31.260]  Beautiful. Good job, guys.
[01:05:33.100 --> 01:05:41.500]  Okay. Thank you very much, Mary. Yeah. Now we're going to go to Jesse in California. Hello, Jesse.
[01:05:42.940 --> 01:05:47.660]  Hey, Randy. What do you have for us today?
[01:05:47.660 --> 01:05:57.580]  Okay. So I walked into a gas station yesterday and right when I got to the door,
[01:05:57.580 --> 01:06:02.140]  some lady was smoking a cigarette about 20 feet at the corner of the building
[01:06:03.740 --> 01:06:07.900]  and I did some research and I discovered that in the city that this happened at,
[01:06:08.460 --> 01:06:13.740]  there's an ordinance specifically stating that illegal to smoke in public places.
[01:06:13.740 --> 01:06:19.580]  Oh, sorry. It just makes me a bunch of stuff. I'm out of breath.
[01:06:23.660 --> 01:06:28.220]  But I was wondering what type of damages that I could bring up against you to specifically state
[01:06:28.220 --> 01:06:39.420]  in the law that I can bring legal action against her. I'm just curious what... Wait a minute. The law
[01:06:39.420 --> 01:06:46.220]  says that someone, if someone is smoking in a public place, then it creates a cause of action
[01:06:46.220 --> 01:06:47.180]  for a third party?
[01:06:50.860 --> 01:06:55.420]  It doesn't... I think it's specifically about a third part. It does say a private citizen...
[01:06:57.180 --> 01:07:03.020]  Hold on. It says notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a private citizen may
[01:07:03.020 --> 01:07:10.860]  bring legal action to enforce this chapter. Okay. Then that one, I'm not sure what the
[01:07:10.860 --> 01:07:13.580]  legal action would be other than filing a complaint.
[01:07:20.380 --> 01:07:26.460]  And unless you could show harm, approximate harm. Well, the harm is that it specifically states that
[01:07:26.460 --> 01:07:33.020]  the toxic chemical of secondhand smoke is specifically... It's like the most toxic chemical
[01:07:33.020 --> 01:07:40.620]  there is. So it's a declaration of nuisance. I'm just new to all this stuff.
[01:07:41.580 --> 01:07:54.620]  Okay. I can see where you could... If they're outside, then I can't figure a way where you could
[01:07:54.620 --> 01:08:05.100]  formulate some type of harm. Unless you went up and stuck your face in front of her breath and
[01:08:05.100 --> 01:08:10.460]  breathed in the smoke because she's outside, she's not in a confined space.
[01:08:11.900 --> 01:08:20.780]  Well, she's breaking the law based on the requirements like the... Where it is prohibited
[01:08:20.780 --> 01:08:26.140]  that you can't smoke. She was specifically smoking where it's illegal to smoke.
[01:08:28.300 --> 01:08:31.820]  So what does the code say? You can't smoke in a public place?
[01:08:31.820 --> 01:08:35.020]  I'm from the city manager. Sorry, what was that?
[01:08:36.300 --> 01:08:40.140]  Does the code says you can't smoke in a public place?
[01:08:42.060 --> 01:08:45.740]  There's a whole bunch of specific places that you can't smoke.
[01:08:45.740 --> 01:08:52.300]  But the ordinance is specifically saying like public places. I went through all the definitions
[01:08:52.300 --> 01:08:57.260]  and everything and it pretty much is saying that where she was smoking it would be illegal.
[01:08:59.660 --> 01:09:07.500]  Then I would think you'd file a criminal complaint. I'm just thinking that's
[01:09:07.500 --> 01:09:20.220]  a pretty nit-picking thing to pick a fight over. There are some really cool fights we can pick.
[01:09:21.420 --> 01:09:26.780]  Oh, I know. I know all about him and I plan on finding all of them. I have so many lawsuits
[01:09:26.780 --> 01:09:32.220]  right now that I can file. This just happens. I was just wondering if there was any type of damages.
[01:09:32.220 --> 01:09:38.300]  I'm going to say absolutely. Go ahead, Brett.
[01:09:39.820 --> 01:09:47.500]  I wouldn't think that the code ordinances kind of a thing is somewhere that you want to try to
[01:09:49.660 --> 01:09:57.340]  hang your hat there. The ordinances, technically they only apply to the city officials. The people
[01:09:57.340 --> 01:10:01.340]  that work for the city or they have a contract with the city, they're the ones that have to
[01:10:01.340 --> 01:10:10.140]  follow those rules. Yes, while they technically try to foist them on everybody, my defense for that,
[01:10:10.140 --> 01:10:16.300]  if I were out there just smoking you in the outdoors like that, I would say that's your rules.
[01:10:17.340 --> 01:10:23.980]  You go follow your own rules. Don't bother me. It's not the same thing as where you've been harmed.
[01:10:23.980 --> 01:10:31.900]  There's some codified offense that's actually a crime. Person A harmed, person B, that's a crime.
[01:10:33.900 --> 01:10:41.500]  Let me explain the concept behind that. The legislature by constitution was authorized
[01:10:41.500 --> 01:10:49.020]  to write law. They were also authorized to create courts as they need them and the legislature
[01:10:49.020 --> 01:11:01.100]  created municipal courts. But the legislature authorized municipalities to write ordinances.
[01:11:03.020 --> 01:11:08.940]  Now, you notice they did not call them laws. They called them ordinances and that's because the
[01:11:08.940 --> 01:11:16.780]  legislature was given the power to write law but was given no power to delegate that right.
[01:11:16.780 --> 01:11:27.500]  So, a municipality can write an ordinance but that ordinance is effectively only a
[01:11:29.100 --> 01:11:38.540]  corporate restriction, a corporate rule. So, it'll only apply to you if you're an employee
[01:11:38.540 --> 01:11:48.380]  of the corporation or you're bound within a commercial nexus with the corporation wherein
[01:11:48.380 --> 01:11:54.380]  you've agreed to abide by all of their ordinances. But if you're a free citizen and they attempt to
[01:11:54.380 --> 01:12:04.220]  apply the ordinance to you, that makes it a law and the legislature cannot delegate its power
[01:12:04.220 --> 01:12:10.300]  to write law. Does that make sense, Jesse? Yeah, that makes sense.
[01:12:13.260 --> 01:12:17.660]  But so, she was working at a gas station and she was the worker of a gas station and I'm the
[01:12:17.660 --> 01:12:24.540]  private citizen who was exposed to her toxic smoke that she was committing a crime to smoke
[01:12:24.540 --> 01:12:27.980]  and when I walked into the gas station and asked her if she was allowed to do that, she said that
[01:12:27.980 --> 01:12:34.300]  she was allowed to and I go and I read the law and I find out that she's breaking the law. So,
[01:12:34.300 --> 01:12:40.220]  outside of filing the complaints to the city manager, based on what it says about legal action
[01:12:40.220 --> 01:12:44.780]  and my ignorance, I was just wondering, is there any damages based on what she did?
[01:12:45.820 --> 01:12:49.820]  And it might not be so mature but it's really the gas station that's allowing this to happen.
[01:12:50.780 --> 01:12:56.940]  The only way I can imagine that you would be able to show damages is if the law says that a
[01:12:56.940 --> 01:13:10.620]  violation of this statute or ordinance is harm per se. A due process violation in the Fed is
[01:13:10.620 --> 01:13:16.220]  considered harm per se. So, like when I'm talking about taking someone to the magistrate, they don't
[01:13:16.220 --> 01:13:21.100]  take me directly near as magistrate, I don't have to show that I was harmed by that. That's
[01:13:21.100 --> 01:13:28.700]  harm per se. But to say that because someone's outside in a non-designated area smoking,
[01:13:29.500 --> 01:13:36.380]  that that harmed me personally, even if it did, I can't see how you could possibly prove it.
[01:13:37.980 --> 01:13:41.180]  Well, if there's cameras on the premises, that'd be evident.
[01:13:42.540 --> 01:13:50.780]  The fact that you're there is insufficient. If I am hitting people on the head with a hammer
[01:13:50.780 --> 01:13:57.500]  and you walk past and I don't hit you on the head with a hammer, you don't have a claim.
[01:13:59.500 --> 01:14:01.500]  You don't have a claim if you can show harm.
[01:14:03.900 --> 01:14:12.140]  I could have harmed you but I didn't. She could have harmed you by smoking and if she did,
[01:14:12.140 --> 01:14:15.500]  you would have to be able to show it. If I hit you with a hammer, you'd have a hammer mark.
[01:14:15.500 --> 01:14:23.180]  Okay, that's what I was trying to do. I knew it would be hard to kind of prove
[01:14:23.980 --> 01:14:27.020]  how the toxic chemicals from a cigarette damage their effect.
[01:14:28.940 --> 01:14:33.980]  Yeah, and you couldn't claim that I've been damaged, been harmed by cigarettes my whole life.
[01:14:35.500 --> 01:14:40.620]  You would have to show specifically that that person, violating that law,
[01:14:40.620 --> 01:14:45.180]  directly damaged you. I can't see you ever getting there.
[01:14:46.860 --> 01:14:51.500]  There'd just be no proof of the damage towards me. I can prove that she's breaking the law
[01:14:52.220 --> 01:14:55.580]  and whatever but there's no proof of that affecting me.
[01:14:56.460 --> 01:15:03.660]  Right, so you could give notice of crime but you wouldn't have a cause of action against her.
[01:15:03.660 --> 01:15:12.220]  It's either cause of action or tort-feasor. So when it's saying that I can bring legal
[01:15:12.220 --> 01:15:16.060]  action to enforce this chapter, it's just saying like calling the city manager or stuff like that.
[01:15:16.060 --> 01:15:21.580]  It's not referring to bringing a suit against her. No, legal action in that case, they're probably
[01:15:23.340 --> 01:15:29.740]  referring to a criminal complaint or a petition for a sanctions with a court or something.
[01:15:29.740 --> 01:15:34.220]  But I don't know, the only thing I could imagine would be a criminal complaint.
[01:15:36.940 --> 01:15:46.460]  But why they would, that doesn't make sense. Why they would, the right to take action has to
[01:15:47.020 --> 01:15:53.420]  be incorporated into more than just that cigarette issue because that one would be
[01:15:53.420 --> 01:16:01.420]  so tenuous as to be absolutely unprovable. Is that authorization grouped with more,
[01:16:02.140 --> 01:16:05.260]  with other things other than just the smoking issue?
[01:16:07.420 --> 01:16:10.300]  Are you saying other violations? Yes.
[01:16:12.940 --> 01:16:19.740]  Yeah, there's duty of person, employer, business or non-profit entity, prohibition of smoking,
[01:16:19.740 --> 01:16:26.940]  uh, not my name, uh, certain unenclosed areas. There's a couple of different things that she
[01:16:26.940 --> 01:16:38.060]  violated. Well, if there's one of those that if she violated it, it would necessarily place you
[01:16:38.060 --> 01:16:45.820]  in a position to where you would be affected by the smoke, then that authorization to take legal
[01:16:45.820 --> 01:16:52.620]  action would make sense. But if she's out in the open smoking and you only have a casual connection
[01:16:52.620 --> 01:16:57.740]  with her, I can't see any way that could apply. Do you have anything else for us? Hang on.
[01:17:00.140 --> 01:17:04.620]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.260 --> 01:17:10.860]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares proven method. Michael Meares has won six cases
[01:17:10.860 --> 01:17:16.300]  in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions
[01:17:16.300 --> 01:17:21.580]  in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute, what to do when
[01:17:21.580 --> 01:17:27.100]  contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt
[01:17:27.100 --> 01:17:32.700]  collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you
[01:17:32.700 --> 01:17:38.540]  to go away. The Michael Meares proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.540 --> 01:17:44.300]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:44.300 --> 01:17:51.660]  and click on the blue Michael Meares banner or email MichaelMeares at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:51.660 --> 01:17:59.500]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.220 --> 01:18:05.100]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so
[01:18:05.100 --> 01:18:09.740]  addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without
[01:18:09.740 --> 01:18:14.940]  logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer
[01:18:14.940 --> 01:18:19.500]  but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on
[01:18:19.500 --> 01:18:25.900]  supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon,
[01:18:25.900 --> 01:18:30.860]  you can help logos. You're ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your
[01:18:30.860 --> 01:18:38.220]  cookies. Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when
[01:18:38.220 --> 01:18:44.860]  you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No.
[01:18:44.860 --> 01:18:50.860]  Do I have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes.
[01:18:50.860 --> 01:18:56.860]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.860 --> 01:19:00.860]  We are Logos. Happy Holidays Logos.
[01:19:00.860 --> 01:19:10.860]  This is the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:19:10.860 --> 01:19:28.860]  Music
[01:19:28.860 --> 01:19:34.860]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kalkin, Brett Fountain, the real world radio, and we're talking to Jesse in California
[01:19:34.860 --> 01:19:40.860]  and Jesse, you're going to find a better fight.
[01:19:40.860 --> 01:19:48.860]  I have literally backlogged so many fights that I've been way too long. I procrastinate on so much stuff.
[01:19:48.860 --> 01:19:52.860]  This lady just kind of got me motivated because she was pretty rude to me and how I like,
[01:19:52.860 --> 01:19:56.860]  because she wasn't just some random person like I'm just walking through a park or whatever
[01:19:56.860 --> 01:20:02.860]  and she's out in the open like she was, she's a worker at the gas station taking a smoke break
[01:20:02.860 --> 01:20:10.860]  and her smoke directly came into my line of when I'm walking into the store and I'm inhaling toxic smoke.
[01:20:10.860 --> 01:20:16.860]  So I'm just wondering what, like she's violating my right to, can't remember exactly how he says it, my right to...
[01:20:16.860 --> 01:20:18.860]  Okay, suggestion.
[01:20:18.860 --> 01:20:23.860]  Well, we used to have a right to breathe, but I guess that's not really the case anymore.
[01:20:23.860 --> 01:20:31.860]  Make up a criminal complaint and file it against the whoever owns the gas station.
[01:20:31.860 --> 01:20:37.860]  For sure. What did you say before we went to break?
[01:20:37.860 --> 01:20:41.860]  It sounded like what you were saying was exactly what I was hoping you would say along the lines,
[01:20:41.860 --> 01:20:47.860]  putting it together to find a claim. Do you remember?
[01:20:47.860 --> 01:20:55.860]  That's too far back. I'm trying to remember what I was saying when we went out.
[01:20:55.860 --> 01:21:02.860]  Actually, I was trying to ask if you had anything else, but I don't remember before that.
[01:21:02.860 --> 01:21:06.860]  It's about the smoking as a nuisance, declaration of a nuisance.
[01:21:06.860 --> 01:21:11.860]  You're saying something about if she... I don't know.
[01:21:11.860 --> 01:21:19.860]  It could be a criminal and that you can make a claim about, but making a claim about harm,
[01:21:19.860 --> 01:21:22.860]  I can't see how you could get there even if you were harmed by it.
[01:21:22.860 --> 01:21:25.860]  I can't see how you could prove it since you're outside because you'll say,
[01:21:25.860 --> 01:21:31.860]  well, the wind was in my face and blown away from him so he couldn't have got any smoke on it.
[01:21:31.860 --> 01:21:35.860]  But she was still violating the law and where she was smoking at.
[01:21:35.860 --> 01:21:39.860]  So she didn't really have a plan to say, oh, I didn't know or whatever,
[01:21:39.860 --> 01:21:42.860]  that she wasn't supposed to be there smoking.
[01:21:42.860 --> 01:21:46.860]  Let me address that part a little.
[01:21:46.860 --> 01:21:51.860]  Just because you're doing something that violates the law
[01:21:51.860 --> 01:21:57.860]  does not mean that you're committing a crime.
[01:21:57.860 --> 01:22:04.860]  For some violations, there is no remedy.
[01:22:04.860 --> 01:22:08.860]  So there has to be a remedy associated with it.
[01:22:08.860 --> 01:22:12.860]  Now, if the ordinance says that if you...
[01:22:12.860 --> 01:22:22.860]  that talks about all this down at the end and says if it says like a violation of this section is a class A, class B, class C misdemeanor,
[01:22:22.860 --> 01:22:24.860]  then it is a crime.
[01:22:24.860 --> 01:22:28.860]  But if it doesn't say that, then they're just telling you not to do that
[01:22:28.860 --> 01:22:35.860]  and you find that in a lot of cases in law where you're directed or prohibited to do something
[01:22:35.860 --> 01:22:41.860]  like when you go to the court and don't wear a mask.
[01:22:41.860 --> 01:22:45.860]  Do you have a requirement to wear a mask, but there's no remedy?
[01:22:45.860 --> 01:22:46.860]  Yeah.
[01:22:46.860 --> 01:22:50.860]  It's not designated a crime.
[01:22:50.860 --> 01:22:56.860]  That's why the violations that she can get is just fines and community services,
[01:22:56.860 --> 01:23:00.860]  the only thing that she can get is the law.
[01:23:00.860 --> 01:23:05.860]  If they assess a fine, now they've written a law.
[01:23:05.860 --> 01:23:11.860]  That they don't have authority to do, only the legislature can do that.
[01:23:11.860 --> 01:23:12.860]  Yeah.
[01:23:12.860 --> 01:23:17.860]  I'm remembering now that the ordinances aren't even valid anyway.
[01:23:17.860 --> 01:23:20.860]  So I'm trying to use it to my advantage.
[01:23:20.860 --> 01:23:22.860]  It's time to play with someone.
[01:23:22.860 --> 01:23:25.860]  Sorry about that.
[01:23:25.860 --> 01:23:35.860]  It's more fun to invalidate their ordinances because that particular claim is a constitutional claim.
[01:23:35.860 --> 01:23:42.860]  And if you get that claim to the Supreme, they might rule that you're right.
[01:23:42.860 --> 01:23:47.860]  The legislature was not authorized to delegate its lawmaking authority,
[01:23:47.860 --> 01:23:51.860]  and then all of the ordinances in the state of California would be invalidated.
[01:23:51.860 --> 01:23:55.860]  Now, if you get a lawyer, he's going to look at this and he's going to say,
[01:23:55.860 --> 01:24:01.860]  the likelihood of this guy getting that order is very, very slim.
[01:24:01.860 --> 01:24:09.860]  But do you want to take that risk when you're bringing issues?
[01:24:09.860 --> 01:24:17.860]  You want to look first for constitutional issues or issues that if you are ruled against,
[01:24:17.860 --> 01:24:22.860]  will destabilize the body of law.
[01:24:22.860 --> 01:24:27.860]  Trial courts really don't care about that, but the Court of Appeals does.
[01:24:27.860 --> 01:24:33.860]  That's primarily what the Court of Appeals does is they look at these rulings,
[01:24:33.860 --> 01:24:41.860]  well, this ruling, if approved by us and used by other lawyers and other cases,
[01:24:41.860 --> 01:24:48.860]  destabilize the court pursuers, cause problems in other areas that are not exactly obvious.
[01:24:48.860 --> 01:24:54.860]  And it's the Court of Appeals' job to make sure they don't allow that kind of thing through.
[01:24:54.860 --> 01:24:59.860]  So when you bring issues, you want to bring issues to have a constitutional ring to them.
[01:24:59.860 --> 01:25:01.860]  Does that make sense?
[01:25:01.860 --> 01:25:02.860]  Yeah, that makes sense.
[01:25:02.860 --> 01:25:07.860]  I was reading case law about from a Michael Mayer suit and that makes a lot of sense.
[01:25:07.860 --> 01:25:18.860]  But it was from the appeals and appeals was striking down much of the stuff that the original Court had determined.
[01:25:18.860 --> 01:25:23.860]  Yeah, and they will only strike it down if it's going to cause them a problem.
[01:25:23.860 --> 01:25:35.860]  So you want to look at all of your claims that you make and find the ones that will give them the most difficulty if they rule against you.
[01:25:35.860 --> 01:25:38.860]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[01:25:38.860 --> 01:25:42.860]  Okay, do you have anything else for us, Jesse?
[01:25:42.860 --> 01:25:49.860]  No, I'm going to get on to the more serious stuff and hopefully get this stuff out of here working with Manny on it.
[01:25:49.860 --> 01:25:51.860]  Okay, thank you, Jesse.
[01:25:51.860 --> 01:25:54.860]  Now we're going to Penny in Texas.
[01:25:54.860 --> 01:25:55.860]  Hello, Penny.
[01:25:55.860 --> 01:25:59.860]  What do you have for us today?
[01:25:59.860 --> 01:26:00.860]  Hey, Randy.
[01:26:00.860 --> 01:26:01.860]  Can you hear me?
[01:26:01.860 --> 01:26:04.860]  Yes, I can hear you.
[01:26:04.860 --> 01:26:13.860]  Okay, the first thing is, is I heard you questioning about the how to get notified if your email goes through.
[01:26:13.860 --> 01:26:14.860]  There's a website.
[01:26:14.860 --> 01:26:23.860]  I sent it to you a link for it on your email, but it's called getnotified.com.
[01:26:23.860 --> 01:26:32.860]  And you get a whole little receipt back when your email, not only that it gets delivered, but that it gets read.
[01:26:32.860 --> 01:26:35.860]  So that might be, and it's absolutely free.
[01:26:35.860 --> 01:26:39.860]  I have seen that before now that you mentioned it.
[01:26:39.860 --> 01:26:40.860]  Yeah.
[01:26:40.860 --> 01:26:48.860]  Because I generally, when somebody has one of these little pop-ups that they want me to pop, to click it, to tell them I read it,
[01:26:48.860 --> 01:26:51.860]  I mostly get that from advertisers.
[01:26:51.860 --> 01:26:53.860]  I don't click it.
[01:26:53.860 --> 01:26:56.860]  But yeah, I have a couple friends who send me those things too.
[01:26:56.860 --> 01:26:58.860]  I never respond to them.
[01:26:58.860 --> 01:27:06.860]  But from this, I don't know if they have to actually click it and go, yeah, we've received it,
[01:27:06.860 --> 01:27:12.860]  or whether it just automatically lets you know that they not only have received it,
[01:27:12.860 --> 01:27:17.860]  but it gives you the time that they spent reading it.
[01:27:17.860 --> 01:27:19.860]  That is interesting.
[01:27:19.860 --> 01:27:21.860]  Brett, you're the super geek here.
[01:27:21.860 --> 01:27:24.860]  What do you know about that?
[01:27:24.860 --> 01:27:26.860]  The time that they spent.
[01:27:26.860 --> 01:27:36.860]  Yeah, about these apps that will tell you if they, do they have something that can tell that you actually opened the email?
[01:27:36.860 --> 01:27:37.860]  Sure.
[01:27:37.860 --> 01:27:39.860]  Right.
[01:27:39.860 --> 01:27:42.860]  Yeah, they typically use a web bug for that.
[01:27:42.860 --> 01:27:46.860]  That's the type of return.
[01:27:46.860 --> 01:27:49.860]  I'm sorry, go ahead.
[01:27:49.860 --> 01:27:54.860]  It gives you the time that they opened it and their IP address.
[01:27:54.860 --> 01:27:55.860]  Right.
[01:27:55.860 --> 01:27:58.860]  So that's called a web bug.
[01:27:58.860 --> 01:28:03.860]  It's a tiny, usually one pixel transparent image.
[01:28:03.860 --> 01:28:08.860]  And they'll embed that into the email.
[01:28:08.860 --> 01:28:17.860]  And if the person's, even the recipient's email client is set up so that it will render pictures in their email,
[01:28:17.860 --> 01:28:20.860]  many are like Gmail or something,
[01:28:20.860 --> 01:28:26.860]  they will go ahead and render those pictures when the person looks at the email.
[01:28:26.860 --> 01:28:33.860]  Then their computer went and reached out to that other web server where that one pixel image is located.
[01:28:33.860 --> 01:28:40.860]  And so that other web server has a record of that request and can tell you where they're located.
[01:28:40.860 --> 01:28:43.860]  You know, tell you a lot of things about their browser.
[01:28:43.860 --> 01:28:52.860]  They prefer the German language, whatever, and all of that gets reported at the time of them opening their email.
[01:28:52.860 --> 01:28:56.860]  That's why Brett gets the big bucks.
[01:28:56.860 --> 01:28:59.860]  Yeah.
[01:28:59.860 --> 01:29:02.860]  Randy said he's going to double my pay.
[01:29:02.860 --> 01:29:08.860]  I'm going to go from zero to two zeros.
[01:29:08.860 --> 01:29:13.860]  Oh, that's interesting. That's good to know.
[01:29:13.860 --> 01:29:20.860]  But what Brett was doing, Brett was being a stinker.
[01:29:20.860 --> 01:29:31.860]  He was saying that when you put that request in there, if you send me a request to give me notice when this email has been read,
[01:29:31.860 --> 01:29:33.860]  that doesn't mean anything.
[01:29:33.860 --> 01:29:44.860]  If I give a public official that notice, then that comes in under the Public Information Act.
[01:29:44.860 --> 01:29:47.860]  I count that as a record request.
[01:29:47.860 --> 01:29:50.860]  And I only tell them that after they've violated it.
[01:29:50.860 --> 01:29:54.860]  So I check the box to say I want a read receipt.
[01:29:54.860 --> 01:30:01.860]  And then when they do not give me a read receipt, after 10 days there.
[01:30:01.860 --> 01:30:05.860]  Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:30:05.860 --> 01:30:10.860]  The new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff.
[01:30:10.860 --> 01:30:16.860]  I've got your camera at all, Brett, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:30:16.860 --> 01:30:18.860]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.860 --> 01:30:21.860]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.860 --> 01:30:26.860]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.860 --> 01:30:31.860]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.860 --> 01:30:34.860]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.860 --> 01:30:37.860]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.860 --> 01:30:41.860]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.860 --> 01:30:44.860]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.860 --> 01:30:49.860]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right?
[01:30:49.860 --> 01:30:50.860]  Wrong.
[01:30:50.860 --> 01:30:55.860]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:55.860 --> 01:31:02.860]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[01:31:02.860 --> 01:31:05.860]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners triggered the appetite,
[01:31:05.860 --> 01:31:09.860]  but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:31:09.860 --> 01:31:12.860]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings,
[01:31:12.860 --> 01:31:15.860]  which can result in a larger overall calorie intake.
[01:31:15.860 --> 01:31:18.860]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight,
[01:31:18.860 --> 01:31:23.860]  and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:31:23.860 --> 01:31:28.860]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:54.860 --> 01:31:57.860]  We are Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.860 --> 01:32:24.860]  Rememberbuilding7.org today.
[01:32:27.860 --> 01:32:30.860]  The rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:30.860 --> 01:32:34.860]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[01:32:34.860 --> 01:32:38.860]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:38.860 --> 01:32:40.860]  and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.860 --> 01:32:43.860]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:43.860 --> 01:32:47.860]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:47.860 --> 01:32:50.860]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.860 --> 01:32:54.860]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.860 --> 01:33:01.860]  With your copy today and together, we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:01.860 --> 01:33:30.860]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:31.860 --> 01:33:36.860]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, the rule of law radio.
[01:33:36.860 --> 01:33:42.860]  And on the break, we were talking about the fact that Brett is grieving these lawyers
[01:33:42.860 --> 01:33:49.860]  when they don't click that box and give them notice that they answered their email.
[01:33:49.860 --> 01:33:57.860]  And it brought up an issue that I just advised someone in the Houston area to do.
[01:33:57.860 --> 01:34:04.860]  He said, if you want to get control of your lawyer, then bar grieve the lawyer on the other side.
[01:34:04.860 --> 01:34:10.860]  And then when your lawyer comes to you because the other lawyer come whining into him
[01:34:10.860 --> 01:34:16.860]  because his client bar-greaved him, you bar-greave the other lawyer again
[01:34:16.860 --> 01:34:25.860]  because the lawyer is forbidden to speak to anyone about that bar grievance except the bar.
[01:34:25.860 --> 01:34:31.860]  So if somebody else knows about it, they had to get it from that lawyer and he's forbidden to say it.
[01:34:31.860 --> 01:34:36.860]  And that's one thing that will actually get them sanctioned.
[01:34:36.860 --> 01:34:40.860]  Supposed to have a caller in from New York, he was supposed to call in.
[01:34:40.860 --> 01:34:43.860]  He got two lawyers sanctioned for exactly that.
[01:34:43.860 --> 01:34:45.860]  He called me laughing and chuckling about it.
[01:34:45.860 --> 01:34:51.860]  He's been sending a whole stack of bar grievances and they dump all of them.
[01:34:51.860 --> 01:34:58.860]  And then he sends one in because the lawyer complained to the court about the bar grievance.
[01:34:58.860 --> 01:35:00.860]  And they sanctioned them.
[01:35:00.860 --> 01:35:04.860]  I don't know if they actually sanctioned them or they did something to them.
[01:35:04.860 --> 01:35:08.860]  They essentially cut a button off their shirt, gave them a warning or something,
[01:35:08.860 --> 01:35:12.860]  but the bar actually did something about it.
[01:35:12.860 --> 01:35:13.860]  That's unusual.
[01:35:13.860 --> 01:35:18.860]  So complaining about the grievance to somebody else will do it, huh?
[01:35:18.860 --> 01:35:21.860]  Maybe facilitate that.
[01:35:21.860 --> 01:35:23.860]  Oh, yeah.
[01:35:23.860 --> 01:35:35.860]  Like going complaining to the judge about the bar grievance with the dagger to my neck and the sword of Damocles.
[01:35:35.860 --> 01:35:41.860]  Anyway, the things that turn out to be the most powerful are the most nitpicky.
[01:35:41.860 --> 01:35:47.860]  Penny, I think we kind of bushwhacked your session.
[01:35:47.860 --> 01:35:50.860]  What did you have for us?
[01:35:50.860 --> 01:36:00.860]  Well, the other, the question that I'd really like to know is how come it took you so long to take Abbott down?
[01:36:00.860 --> 01:36:04.860]  I mean, this thing's been going on for what, over a year?
[01:36:04.860 --> 01:36:07.860]  Wait, wait, say that again?
[01:36:07.860 --> 01:36:12.860]  You know, when you said in the complaint against Abbott, when did you send it in?
[01:36:12.860 --> 01:36:16.860]  October the 8th.
[01:36:16.860 --> 01:36:17.860]  Last year.
[01:36:17.860 --> 01:36:18.860]  Of last year.
[01:36:18.860 --> 01:36:27.860]  And the grand jury for last year was, they were short on grand juries and they had all they could handle.
[01:36:27.860 --> 01:36:32.860]  And they told me then, we're just not going to be able to get to it in this session.
[01:36:32.860 --> 01:36:37.860]  They will have it to give it to the grand jury in the next session.
[01:36:37.860 --> 01:36:43.860]  And they said, we'll just, we'll get it to them when we get to it.
[01:36:43.860 --> 01:36:47.860]  That was not something I had any control over.
[01:36:47.860 --> 01:36:54.860]  Man, I wish you would have warmed his ass way back when.
[01:36:54.860 --> 01:36:58.860]  Well, I actually was not after him.
[01:36:58.860 --> 01:37:02.860]  I filed a complaint against him on the 8th.
[01:37:02.860 --> 01:37:09.860]  Then I filed a complaint against him with the Chief Justice of the Supreme.
[01:37:09.860 --> 01:37:15.860]  And in his, in the Chief Justice's capacity as a magistrate.
[01:37:15.860 --> 01:37:31.860]  And I opined that since I was filing against the highest level officer in the executive, it was appropriate that I file with the highest level magistrate in the judiciary.
[01:37:31.860 --> 01:37:41.860]  Under 2.09, who are magistrates, first one justices of the Supreme Court, and he was the Chief Justice of the Supreme, Judge Hetch.
[01:37:41.860 --> 01:37:45.860]  Judge Hetch did not hold an examining trial.
[01:37:45.860 --> 01:37:47.860]  I have a rule.
[01:37:47.860 --> 01:37:56.860]  Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do.
[01:37:56.860 --> 01:38:05.860]  So I filed criminal charges against Judge Hetch with the presiding judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge Heller.
[01:38:05.860 --> 01:38:16.860]  And asked her to hold an examining trial on my allegation of official misconduct, official oppression against Judge Hetch.
[01:38:16.860 --> 01:38:31.860]  Because he failed a form of duty he was required to perform and in the process denied the governor in his right to present exculpatory evidence to the court so that it would be available to the grand jury.
[01:38:31.860 --> 01:38:39.860]  My underlying purpose was to get examining trials back in use in Texas.
[01:38:39.860 --> 01:38:48.860]  So by taking on the highest judges in Texas, I should be able to get a little more action.
[01:38:48.860 --> 01:38:50.860]  Yeah.
[01:38:50.860 --> 01:39:02.860]  So what can we do if we prove that the original research on COVID was fraudulent?
[01:39:02.860 --> 01:39:09.860]  It depends on who produced the fraudulent information.
[01:39:09.860 --> 01:39:12.860]  They weren't acting on it today in the first place, though.
[01:39:12.860 --> 01:39:20.860]  These researchers produced the fraudulent information, but the United States acted on that fraudulent information.
[01:39:20.860 --> 01:39:34.860]  And different doctors here in the U.S. who, you know, not bothered to read the fraudulent research, so they've all gone along with the lie.
[01:39:34.860 --> 01:39:51.860]  This is a complex question, the research. Who did the research and how do you determine that the research is necessarily fraudulent?
[01:39:51.860 --> 01:40:10.860]  Well, if you read the research, it never, in the summary it said it passed Coke's postulates and rivers, which are the definitive test for an infectious or contagious disease.
[01:40:10.860 --> 01:40:23.860]  And when you read the actual research, you find out that it never did. It didn't pass even first, which is sort of a reduced Coke's postulate.
[01:40:23.860 --> 01:40:32.860]  So to whom was this fraudulent statement made?
[01:40:32.860 --> 01:40:44.860]  It was put out there to, supposedly, to identify the COVID-19 virus. It's what the world has been put asunder more.
[01:40:44.860 --> 01:40:48.860]  And you don't have a claim.
[01:40:48.860 --> 01:41:11.860]  If it's fraudulent, you could challenge the professional ethics or standards of the scientist who put this information out. But so far as I know, making an incorrect assessment is not a crime.
[01:41:11.860 --> 01:41:26.860]  Even if you know you made an incorrect assessment, if they're not presenting this to a governmental tribunal where a statement made to that governmental tribunal is defined as a criminal act,
[01:41:26.860 --> 01:41:45.860]  then, and the filing of this, unless if you can show that it is the proximate cause of a harm that you or a group of people suffered, then you would have a civil action.
[01:41:45.860 --> 01:41:58.860]  Well, since the researchers are over in Wuhan, China, how would I get that? How would that work? It couldn't even work here, right? I'm going to have to be in the national tribunal, wouldn't it?
[01:41:58.860 --> 01:42:14.860]  Yes, possibly the Hague. But you would have to show how that actually did harm. Was there contravening evidence available?
[01:42:14.860 --> 01:42:27.860]  Well, the contravening evidence is simply because they did not pass Koch's fossilists. They did not pass rivers, even though in their summarization...
[01:42:27.860 --> 01:42:36.860]  No, no, no, no. What I'm saying is you have to be able to show that you were harmed by this false statement.
[01:42:36.860 --> 01:42:40.860]  Hasn't the whole world been harmed?
[01:42:40.860 --> 01:42:52.860]  Not necessarily by this statement. They've been harmed by the virus, but you would have to show that this false statement did harm and what harm did it do?
[01:42:52.860 --> 01:42:57.860]  Well, the virus is a lie. And there...
[01:42:57.860 --> 01:42:59.860]  Objection. Relevance.
[01:42:59.860 --> 01:43:01.860]  What is that? Huh?
[01:43:01.860 --> 01:43:07.860]  Relevance. How is that relevant to this statement?
[01:43:07.860 --> 01:43:26.860]  The fact that to corral your thought process to focus onto the one part that could or that may or may not get traction as opposed to the whole scenario that can't really come into play here.
[01:43:26.860 --> 01:43:28.860]  You have to focus on that one issue.
[01:43:28.860 --> 01:43:38.860]  The fact that the virus was out there and that the virus caused harm does not transfer to this individual.
[01:43:38.860 --> 01:43:59.860]  You have to find the proximate cause of harm that this caused. And if there were contravening opinions out there that essentially neutralizes his improper claims. Hang on. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[01:43:59.860 --> 01:44:08.860]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:08.860 --> 01:44:16.860]  And it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:16.860 --> 01:44:30.860]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:30.860 --> 01:44:39.860]  We have come to trust Jevity so much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others.
[01:44:39.860 --> 01:44:51.860]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.860 --> 01:45:00.860]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:00.860 --> 01:45:14.860]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:14.860 --> 01:45:22.860]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.860 --> 01:45:33.860]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:33.860 --> 01:45:42.860]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.860 --> 01:45:55.860]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:55.860 --> 01:46:13.860]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:26.860 --> 01:46:31.860]  Okay, come on, come on, come on, come on.
[01:46:31.860 --> 01:46:56.860]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelkin, Brett Fountain, ruleoflawradio, and I'm talking to Penny in Texas and Penny.
[01:46:56.860 --> 01:47:05.860]  I might have seemed a little rude there at the end, but I was doing something very specific, and I'm glad Brett pointed out what I was doing.
[01:47:05.860 --> 01:47:15.860]  We have to be careful in these issues and arguments to carefully define what we're speaking to.
[01:47:15.860 --> 01:47:24.860]  We can't move away from the specific to the more general and use the more general to apply to the more specific.
[01:47:24.860 --> 01:47:31.860]  So we had a specific issue. This guy put out a report and he lied about the report.
[01:47:31.860 --> 01:47:51.860]  Okay, first in order to go after him, since he put out the report and he didn't use this as a statement in a tribunal where a false statement was a criminal act,
[01:47:51.860 --> 01:48:02.860]  and he just put it out there in general, and you have the perfect right to ignore it or follow it.
[01:48:02.860 --> 01:48:12.860]  But if you follow it and someone else has put out a report contravening this one, then the trier of fact was going to say,
[01:48:12.860 --> 01:48:21.860]  well, you followed this one instead of this other one, why? And had you followed this other one, would you have been harmed?
[01:48:21.860 --> 01:48:30.860]  And if you say no, he's going to say, well, the information was out there. You just chose to follow the wrong one.
[01:48:30.860 --> 01:48:40.860]  And what I'm implying is there is no real effective remedy, and that's right, there's not.
[01:48:40.860 --> 01:48:47.860]  There are some things we don't have effective remedies for. Bad science is one of them.
[01:48:47.860 --> 01:49:00.860]  Unless it can be shown that someone relied on this bad science when there was no contravening science out there,
[01:49:00.860 --> 01:49:12.860]  and because of their reliance on this bad science, that was deliberately put out there incorrectly. That makes it fraud, fraud by non-disclosure.
[01:49:12.860 --> 01:49:19.860]  And you were subsequently harmed by relying on this. If someone makes a statement that's untrue, and he knows it's untrue,
[01:49:19.860 --> 01:49:30.860]  and also knows that you don't know that it's untrue, and you don't have equal access to the information he used to make his determination,
[01:49:30.860 --> 01:49:38.860]  so you can't effectively determine that it's untrue, then you rely on that untruth and are harmed by there.
[01:49:38.860 --> 01:49:44.860]  I'm sorry, you are harmed thereby. That is fraud by non-disclosure.
[01:49:44.860 --> 01:49:54.860]  And that's something you would have a claim about, but you would have to be able to show each one of those elements of fraud by non-disclosure.
[01:49:54.860 --> 01:49:56.860]  Does that make sense, Penny?
[01:49:56.860 --> 01:49:58.860]  Yes, it does.
[01:49:58.860 --> 01:50:08.860]  It takes a lot of mental discipline. On this show, I talk about different rules that I have.
[01:50:08.860 --> 01:50:20.860]  And those rules are primarily there to help us keep focus and not drift away from our issues and dilute our issues.
[01:50:20.860 --> 01:50:29.860]  There's a lot of patriot mythologists out there, and one of the primary problems I have with them, and I think one of the primary problems they have,
[01:50:29.860 --> 01:50:40.860]  is when we start talking about a specific issue, and I bring up something that's hard for them to argue,
[01:50:40.860 --> 01:50:49.860]  all these courts are corporations, and I say, okay, so what?
[01:50:49.860 --> 01:50:55.860]  Well, the first thing I did, I had a guy on who's supposed to be a big guru on corporations, this is several years ago,
[01:50:55.860 --> 01:50:59.860]  and he said, oh, the courts are corporations. I said, okay, so what?
[01:50:59.860 --> 01:51:04.860]  And if the corporations, where do I find the articles of a corporation?
[01:51:04.860 --> 01:51:08.860]  Oh, you don't understand. It's not that kind of corporation.
[01:51:08.860 --> 01:51:11.860]  I said, wait a minute, yeah, I do understand.
[01:51:11.860 --> 01:51:17.860]  Corporation is a term of art. It's a legal term that has a specific meaning.
[01:51:17.860 --> 01:51:25.860]  And in order to have a corporation, there must be articles of a corporation and a charter.
[01:51:25.860 --> 01:51:28.860]  Otherwise, there is no corporation, so how do I find it?
[01:51:28.860 --> 01:51:30.860]  Oh, he got real upset.
[01:51:30.860 --> 01:51:40.860]  And, okay, I had bought some peppermint schnapps, and not peppermint, but cinnamon schnapps,
[01:51:40.860 --> 01:51:43.860]  and I didn't know they made it in 100 proof.
[01:51:43.860 --> 01:51:49.860]  And why that stuff was good? And I got drunk that night.
[01:51:49.860 --> 01:51:59.860]  And Deborah pulled a plug on us, but he kept jumping from one issue that he couldn't argue,
[01:51:59.860 --> 01:52:02.860]  then he jumped to another issue.
[01:52:02.860 --> 01:52:09.860]  Well, the courts of corporation, therefore, they have a conflict of interest.
[01:52:09.860 --> 01:52:14.860]  And, yeah, if the court was a corporation, it would have a conflict of interest.
[01:52:14.860 --> 01:52:19.860]  But you never established that the fact that it had a corporation had anything to do with anything.
[01:52:19.860 --> 01:52:22.860]  See, the courts of corporations, they're all incorporated, yeah.
[01:52:22.860 --> 01:52:35.860]  But that's so that the judge can buy toilet paper and pay his employees and buy all the stuff they need to operate the court
[01:52:35.860 --> 01:52:39.860]  and pay the rent when the judge steps up behind the bench.
[01:52:39.860 --> 01:52:45.860]  He does not do so in his corporate capacity as CEO of the corporation.
[01:52:45.860 --> 01:52:53.860]  He steps up behind the bench in his constitutional capacity as a judge.
[01:52:53.860 --> 01:52:59.860]  We can't put those two together, and in order to avoid that, he would jump from one issue to another issue to another.
[01:52:59.860 --> 01:53:04.860]  And I kept bringing him back, and he got real ticked at me.
[01:53:04.860 --> 01:53:09.860]  If you listen to this show much, you'll notice we don't get many of those guys calling in,
[01:53:09.860 --> 01:53:13.860]  because I have great fun at their expense.
[01:53:13.860 --> 01:53:18.860]  I've done a lot of study on how to stay on topic, and if you're going to deal in law,
[01:53:18.860 --> 01:53:23.860]  you have to really discipline yourself to stay specifically on topic.
[01:53:23.860 --> 01:53:28.860]  I argue this issue, and they say, well, yeah, well, what about this over here?
[01:53:28.860 --> 01:53:31.860]  And then when I argue that one, oh, well, what about this one over here?
[01:53:31.860 --> 01:53:34.860]  They go from one to the other to the other. Before you know it,
[01:53:34.860 --> 01:53:37.860]  you're talking about something that didn't have anything to do with what you started with.
[01:53:37.860 --> 01:53:40.860]  Does that sound familiar, Penny?
[01:53:40.860 --> 01:53:43.860]  Yeah, it does. It's just a wide spread.
[01:53:43.860 --> 01:53:47.860]  You know, this lie is so all-reaching.
[01:53:47.860 --> 01:53:49.860]  You know, it's like an infinite...
[01:53:49.860 --> 01:53:57.860]  It is a problem, and we understand that there is more behind this than just one guy lying.
[01:53:57.860 --> 01:53:58.860]  Right.
[01:53:58.860 --> 01:54:07.860]  It is a problem. It is a big problem, and I don't know if we have a direct remedy for that.
[01:54:07.860 --> 01:54:13.860]  When I looked at all that was going on, and, you know, we try not to do politics on this show.
[01:54:13.860 --> 01:54:14.860]  Right.
[01:54:14.860 --> 01:54:24.860]  If in fact this election, if held fairly, would have been a tremendous landslide in Trump's favor,
[01:54:24.860 --> 01:54:28.860]  as is maintained.
[01:54:28.860 --> 01:54:32.860]  Then we have the backbone of this nation on our side,
[01:54:32.860 --> 01:54:38.860]  and we have tools that we can use no matter who the president is.
[01:54:38.860 --> 01:54:57.860]  Like Amazon canceled an account of a social network service because they didn't follow the Biden lie on COVID and on the nature of the election and other things,
[01:54:57.860 --> 01:55:00.860]  so they censured them by canceling them.
[01:55:00.860 --> 01:55:05.860]  I canceled my Amazon account that day.
[01:55:05.860 --> 01:55:11.860]  We have the power to do that, and there are enough numbers, I trust in the public, in the people,
[01:55:11.860 --> 01:55:16.860]  that if they have stolen this election, by the time they get to the next election,
[01:55:16.860 --> 01:55:29.860]  these broadcasters that have all been bought and paid for will be losing enough business and credibility that others will rise up and take their place.
[01:55:29.860 --> 01:55:34.860]  That's the nature of a capitalistic society.
[01:55:34.860 --> 01:55:37.860]  We don't have to do business with you.
[01:55:37.860 --> 01:55:42.860]  We have the power to take you down.
[01:55:42.860 --> 01:55:46.860]  And I have confidence in the country we will get that done.
[01:55:46.860 --> 01:55:51.860]  We just have to, we need someone like you to keep raising these questions.
[01:55:51.860 --> 01:55:56.860]  The remedy for that bad information is good information,
[01:55:56.860 --> 01:56:02.860]  and people pushing good information around no matter how bad they try to censor it.
[01:56:02.860 --> 01:56:04.860]  Yeah, well, they've been censoring it.
[01:56:04.860 --> 01:56:05.860]  Yes, it has.
[01:56:05.860 --> 01:56:11.860]  You've got the CDC admitting that they don't know, they've never isolated this virus.
[01:56:11.860 --> 01:56:14.860]  They've never really identified this virus.
[01:56:14.860 --> 01:56:19.860]  I mean, that's, to me, that's collusion.
[01:56:19.860 --> 01:56:22.860]  Okay, John, you there?
[01:56:22.860 --> 01:56:23.860]  Yes, I am.
[01:56:23.860 --> 01:56:24.860]  I'm right here.
[01:56:24.860 --> 01:56:25.860]  I can help out.
[01:56:25.860 --> 01:56:32.860]  Yeah, I thought you'd be ready to weigh in, let's hear your opinion on this.
[01:56:32.860 --> 01:56:34.860]  I've been, oh, I'll give you facts.
[01:56:34.860 --> 01:56:36.860]  I'll give you facts, not opinion.
[01:56:36.860 --> 01:56:41.860]  I'm ready, and he's done it.
[01:56:41.860 --> 01:56:42.860]  Go.
[01:56:42.860 --> 01:56:43.860]  Okay.
[01:56:43.860 --> 01:56:50.860]  What do you know about this bad information we're getting on supposed research?
[01:56:50.860 --> 01:56:51.860]  Okay.
[01:56:51.860 --> 01:56:55.860]  Now, give me an example of some of the bad information.
[01:56:55.860 --> 01:56:58.860]  Just give me one example, anything.
[01:56:58.860 --> 01:57:04.860]  Penny, will you give us this researcher again you spoke to?
[01:57:04.860 --> 01:57:13.860]  The person that I first found out who was speaking against the research that was done on COVID
[01:57:13.860 --> 01:57:23.860]  initially, the research that the CDC and who were both depending on to put out this COVID-19 lie,
[01:57:23.860 --> 01:57:34.860]  was Dr. Andrew Kauffman, and he showed the research that they did and showed how it was fraudulent.
[01:57:34.860 --> 01:57:41.860]  And so I went and read the research by those researchers and found out what he was saying was true.
[01:57:41.860 --> 01:57:42.860]  It was fraudulent.
[01:57:42.860 --> 01:57:44.860]  It didn't pass Coke's postulate.
[01:57:44.860 --> 01:57:46.860]  It hadn't passed Rivers.
[01:57:46.860 --> 01:57:55.860]  They did not do the purification, isolation of the virus itself.
[01:57:55.860 --> 01:58:01.860]  Well, you may not believe this, but they never isolated HIV either.
[01:58:01.860 --> 01:58:02.860]  Right.
[01:58:02.860 --> 01:58:04.860]  They believe it.
[01:58:04.860 --> 01:58:09.860]  So, is that the music coming up?
[01:58:09.860 --> 01:58:12.860]  What we got before the music is...
[01:58:12.860 --> 01:58:13.860]  40 seconds.
[01:58:13.860 --> 01:58:14.860]  30 seconds.
[01:58:14.860 --> 01:58:15.860]  Okay.
[01:58:15.860 --> 01:58:20.860]  The CDC has a major conflict of interest.
[01:58:20.860 --> 01:58:23.860]  They are the Fox Guardians of the Henhouse.
[01:58:23.860 --> 01:58:25.860]  This is a fact.
[01:58:25.860 --> 01:58:31.860]  They own 58 vaccine patents, and it's a conflict of interest.
[01:58:31.860 --> 01:58:35.860]  They're supposed to protect us, not sell vaccines.
[01:58:35.860 --> 01:58:36.860]  Right.
[01:58:36.860 --> 01:58:37.860]  Hang on.
[01:58:37.860 --> 01:58:41.860]  Okay, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll go radio.
[01:58:41.860 --> 01:59:07.860]  We'll be right back.
[01:59:11.860 --> 01:59:37.860]  We'll be right back.
[01:59:41.860 --> 01:59:55.860]  We'll be right back.