ROL_2021-04-02_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.840]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.840 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 Open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.440]  Silver $16.45 an ounce, Copper $2.75 an ounce, Oil, Texas Crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent Crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.840]  $62.47 a barrel, and Cryptos in order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $200.00
[00:29.840 --> 00:41.400]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a Crypto Coin.
[00:41.400 --> 00:52.520]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on
[00:52.520 --> 00:58.280]  Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and
[00:58.280 --> 01:09.080]  entering 40. In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing
[01:09.080 --> 01:13.640]  heaven to tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston,
[01:13.640 --> 01:17.920]  Austin and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to
[01:17.920 --> 01:22.320]  file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:22.320 --> 01:27.200]  equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney
[01:27.200 --> 01:31.200]  announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery
[01:31.200 --> 01:35.920]  of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including
[01:35.920 --> 01:39.880]  the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday
[01:39.880 --> 01:44.520]  that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate
[01:44.520 --> 01:50.400]  a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the District
[01:50.400 --> 01:56.640]  Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the
[01:56.640 --> 02:01.720]  law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.720 --> 02:06.800]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.800 --> 02:10.840]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.840 --> 02:15.120]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged
[02:15.120 --> 02:22.640]  with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[02:22.640 --> 02:27.480]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark.
[02:27.480 --> 02:32.400]  As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.400 --> 02:38.040]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.040 --> 02:43.040]  Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from
[02:43.040 --> 02:49.240]  a gland near its front fins. For the purpose, it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may
[02:49.240 --> 02:56.240]  be drawn into the glow. This is Ruth Rody with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:49.240 --> 04:11.000]  Good evening. This is the rule of law radio, April 2, 2021. On Friday night, we have four
[04:11.000 --> 04:18.240]  hours to talk about what's on your mind. So here on the rule of law radio, Randy Kelton,
[04:18.240 --> 04:24.120]  I'm Brett Fountain. And Randy, since we don't have any callers yet, tell us what's on your
[04:24.120 --> 04:29.200]  mind about this lawsuit. Well, before I do that, I'm going to turn the
[04:29.200 --> 04:39.560]  call boards on and our call in number 512-646-1984. And I was going to talk about this last night.
[04:39.560 --> 04:47.000]  So if you heard it last night, you're here to give today. But it has going after the
[04:47.000 --> 04:53.960]  county that I live in. And if you've listened much, you kind of know about it already. But
[04:53.960 --> 05:04.640]  it has led me to what actually may be a statewide or even nationwide remedy. You know, all these
[05:04.640 --> 05:12.960]  years we've been talking about filing criminal complaints. And one thing I didn't do is look
[05:12.960 --> 05:19.240]  at the record and actually start filing criminal complaints, not because they did something
[05:19.240 --> 05:28.600]  to me, but just because they did not follow the codes. So, so far I'm getting the county
[05:28.600 --> 05:34.760]  set up good so I can work them over. I've talked to most of the chiefs and only one
[05:34.760 --> 05:44.120]  of them, we've got four or five, one, two, three, four, five municipal police departments
[05:44.120 --> 05:51.920]  in the county. And the smallest one is Runaway Bay, Texas. It's on the opposite side of Bridgeport
[05:51.920 --> 05:59.720]  Lake from Bridgeport, Texas. And that's a real small police department. And the chief
[05:59.720 --> 06:06.480]  of police there was your standard, I've got lots of attitude, and you're just a stupid
[06:06.480 --> 06:11.880]  civilian, you don't know anything. I tried to give him a heads up and he wanted to give
[06:11.880 --> 06:21.160]  me a hard time. So I said, okay, you can't say I broke one of my rules. And that rule
[06:21.160 --> 06:30.720]  was never give fair warning. But I was trying to set up the county. I'm going after the
[06:30.720 --> 06:37.360]  sheriff and I didn't want to go after the municipalities. So they're doing the same
[06:37.360 --> 06:43.800]  things the sheriff's doing. Because they're at least willing to sit down and look at my
[06:43.800 --> 06:49.920]  proposals and look into the possibility of actually following the code the way it's
[06:49.920 --> 06:52.200]  done. I'm not going to go after them.
[06:52.200 --> 06:56.440]  But you don't have to say that you're not going to go after them for anything. You're
[06:56.440 --> 07:01.960]  just not going to go after them for everything over the last three years, like you're considering
[07:01.960 --> 07:06.080]  for, you know, this one guy, he stood out and he was an exception. He decided he wanted
[07:06.080 --> 07:10.680]  to throw down the gauntlet on his own. So it doesn't have to be a whole mess of them.
[07:10.680 --> 07:19.240]  Right. Well, this is deliberate because I want to be taking on one jurisdiction and
[07:19.240 --> 07:26.800]  not the others. It's a demonstration. If you just treat the citizens like they're human
[07:26.800 --> 07:37.160]  beings, you can find that they are easy to work with. But if you don't, this is what
[07:37.160 --> 07:45.200]  they can do to you. And what I'll be doing to the county is for every arrest where a
[07:45.200 --> 07:53.680]  person is taken directly to jail, I'm going to unleash a onslaught on them. I'm going
[07:53.680 --> 08:00.920]  to file criminal charges against the officer for taking it upon himself to ignore what's
[08:00.920 --> 08:07.240]  written in the law and taking the arrested person to jail. I'm going to file against
[08:07.240 --> 08:16.000]  the chief deputy of the sheriff's department for authorizing this behavior. I'm not going
[08:16.000 --> 08:24.920]  to go after the sheriff. He's about to retire anyway. And it'll make him look even worse
[08:24.920 --> 08:35.120]  if I'm going after his deputies from what he directed them to do. And I'm going after
[08:35.120 --> 08:41.040]  the lawyers that represented these people for not filing a subject matter jurisdiction
[08:41.040 --> 08:49.400]  challenge and invoking their right to discharge on the offense because there is no 16-17 order
[08:49.400 --> 08:56.720]  in the record. Well, I was going to talk more about this, but I've already got a full board
[08:56.720 --> 09:02.440]  of callers. I lined right up. So I'm going to go ahead and go to our callers. I'm going
[09:02.440 --> 09:09.480]  to start out with Christie in Texas, and that's appropriate. I just talked to the chief of
[09:09.480 --> 09:16.680]  police in Rome, and I didn't recognize him, but he knew who I was. Apparently, he was
[09:16.680 --> 09:25.480]  a deputy in Boyd, Texas, town I live in, and knew me pretty well then. I guess he knew
[09:25.480 --> 09:34.080]  when I was kind of beating up the chief of police there. That's when I filed a complaint
[09:34.080 --> 09:40.360]  against a nephew-in-law. My niece and him were getting a divorce, and he was acting
[09:40.360 --> 09:45.360]  really ignorant, and I had to throw him off my property. So I filed a criminal trespass,
[09:45.360 --> 09:50.240]  and I told him I don't want to get the guy into trouble. I just want him to calm down.
[09:50.240 --> 09:57.560]  He's acting out and acting ignorant, and he needs to find out there are potential ramifications,
[09:57.560 --> 10:02.880]  so he'll kind of control his personal passions. Well, the chief refused to give my complaint
[10:02.880 --> 10:09.120]  to a magistrate, and when I called him about it, he said, well, the county attorney told
[10:09.120 --> 10:17.800]  me not to. I told him, wait right here. I'll be right back. So I went straight to the county
[10:17.800 --> 10:25.040]  courthouse, and James Staten, the county attorney, met me in the hallway, and said, Mr. Kelton,
[10:25.040 --> 10:30.200]  I know why you're here. And do you think I'm out of my professional mind? Do you really
[10:30.200 --> 10:38.760]  believe I would waive my prosecutorial immunity by giving legal advice to the police department?
[10:38.760 --> 10:46.240]  I said, well, I don't know. James, I'm just following the thunder here. So I went back
[10:46.240 --> 10:50.840]  to the sheriff's department, knocked on the door, and this officer opened the door, and
[10:50.840 --> 10:57.080]  he's grinning from ear to ear. He pretty well knows what's going on. What can I do for you,
[10:57.080 --> 11:04.920]  Mr. Kelton? I told him, tell the chief that James Staten just threw him under the bus,
[11:04.920 --> 11:12.800]  and I'm here to run him over with it. That kind of got around. Everybody got a good laugh
[11:12.800 --> 11:19.520]  at the chief's expense. And so this chief of police knew who I was, and he agreed to
[11:19.520 --> 11:25.480]  look at these issues. But now I've got Krista in Texas, and she happened to have gotten
[11:25.480 --> 11:33.240]  a ticket in Rome, Texas. And that's going to give me the opportunity to throw this chief
[11:33.240 --> 11:50.280]  under the bus. Hello, Krista. Hello. Okay, I got your emails, and Krista has, you got
[11:50.280 --> 11:56.760]  a ticket, a stop sign ticket, and apparently the officer had himself an attitude, and he
[11:56.760 --> 12:06.880]  terrified the children. Now, I'm a grandpa. That's a really bad idea. Police don't get
[12:06.880 --> 12:16.640]  to terrified children. So far as I'm concerned, this officer is fair game. He wants to have
[12:16.640 --> 12:23.280]  himself an attitude. We see if we can help him with that attitude. Krista, you have the
[12:23.280 --> 12:33.720]  documentation that came off my website? Yes, I do. Have you read the challenge to subject
[12:33.720 --> 12:44.520]  matter jurisdiction? Yes, I've read it all, but you might need to refresh me on what that
[12:44.520 --> 12:55.880]  one was. Okay, this is the one that claims that a municipality and sheriff's deputy that
[12:55.880 --> 13:04.240]  no municipality or sheriff's deputy in Wise County has the power to enforce transportation
[13:04.240 --> 13:14.040]  code. Okay, yeah. We want to know where he claims to get that power. In Texas, if a public
[13:14.040 --> 13:23.320]  official exerts or purports to exert an authority they do not expressly have, and in the process
[13:23.320 --> 13:32.960]  commits simple assault, offensive speech, offensive touching, while prominently displaying
[13:32.960 --> 13:40.960]  a deadly weapon, that is a first degree felony in the state of Texas. And you have a complaint
[13:40.960 --> 13:49.000]  form in there accusing the officer of first degree felony aggravated assault. There's
[13:49.000 --> 14:01.560]  also a TECO complaint in there, which is much worse. Everybody in the courthouse will get
[14:01.560 --> 14:08.040]  in line to try to shield this officer from prosecution for class A misdemeanor aggravated
[14:08.040 --> 14:15.800]  assault. But nobody will try to help him from the TECO complaint because there's nothing
[14:15.800 --> 14:26.120]  they can do. He gets the TECO complaint, the bonding company puts a mark on his chart.
[14:26.120 --> 14:34.200]  He's got five more and his career ends. That's not something they can fix. That's not something
[14:34.200 --> 14:42.880]  the officer can fix. That stings him good. I had someone in Newark file a TECO complaint
[14:42.880 --> 14:48.680]  against an officer because the officer was in the municipal court and he was being somewhat
[14:48.680 --> 14:56.800]  aggressive trying to frighten and intimidate Tim while he is acting as a witness. And he
[14:56.800 --> 15:00.680]  called the sheriff, the sheriff didn't respond so he filed a TECO complaint against him.
[15:00.680 --> 15:06.440]  A year later he encountered that same deputy. The deputy was exceptionally rude to him.
[15:06.440 --> 15:13.440]  So he called the sheriff's department again. This time the sheriff got in his vehicle and
[15:13.440 --> 15:21.720]  drove from Decatur, Texas, some 20 miles over to Newark, Texas to talk to him about his
[15:21.720 --> 15:29.000]  complaint. And in the process he asked him, why did you file a TECO complaint against
[15:29.000 --> 15:35.840]  him last time? Why didn't you call me? Tim told him I did. You didn't respond. But when
[15:35.840 --> 15:45.560]  Tim told me that I thought, sheriff, you should not play poker. A year later and that was
[15:45.560 --> 15:52.920]  still fresh in his mind. That's a big deal. So the first thing we want to do is look through
[15:52.920 --> 16:01.120]  all those documents. There is a demand for an examining trial in there. The claims I'm
[16:01.120 --> 16:08.960]  making against all of the deputies in Wise County who arrest anyone is that they did
[16:08.960 --> 16:17.240]  not take them directly to the nearest magistrate and get the magistrate to hold an examining
[16:17.240 --> 16:25.840]  trial and give them permission to take the person to jail. That's what the law requires.
[16:25.840 --> 16:31.640]  That's what due process demands. Now, whenever I tell them this, they say, oh, well, you
[16:31.640 --> 16:39.040]  don't have a right to an examining trial in a misdemeanor. And I say, so what? What's
[16:39.040 --> 16:48.160]  that got to do with finishing? I don't have a right to be arrested. I don't have a right
[16:48.160 --> 16:52.000]  to get a ticket. I don't have a right to have pay all this money. That's in law. That's
[16:52.000 --> 16:57.920]  a due process. And that is something I do have a right to. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett
[16:57.920 --> 17:03.360]  Fountain, here's our radio. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls,
[17:03.360 --> 17:08.960]  letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[17:08.960 --> 17:13.400]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[17:13.400 --> 17:18.800]  can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using
[17:18.800 --> 17:24.520]  federal civil rights statute. What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[17:24.520 --> 17:28.440]  How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit
[17:28.440 --> 17:33.800]  reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[17:33.800 --> 17:38.920]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[17:38.920 --> 17:44.360]  consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[17:44.360 --> 17:49.680]  and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner, or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com. That's
[17:49.680 --> 17:59.160]  ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[17:59.160 --> 18:05.800]  now. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[18:05.800 --> 18:08.760]  we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have
[18:08.760 --> 18:12.800]  a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[18:12.800 --> 18:16.040]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[18:16.040 --> 18:20.000]  private capacity, and most importantly, the right to do process of law. Traffic courts
[18:20.000 --> 18:23.960]  afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[18:23.960 --> 18:27.800]  through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law
[18:27.800 --> 18:31.280]  Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[18:31.280 --> 18:35.320]  understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. You can get
[18:35.320 --> 18:39.360]  your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering
[18:39.360 --> 18:43.320]  your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation
[18:43.320 --> 18:47.800]  Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of
[18:47.800 --> 18:51.480]  research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights
[18:51.480 --> 18:56.120]  with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can
[18:56.120 --> 19:03.120]  have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:26.120 --> 19:44.120]  We're standing like it's out of control on the edge of a hole inside a deep and dark
[19:44.120 --> 19:59.120]  hole. We're standing like it's out of control on the edge of a hole inside a deep and dark
[19:59.120 --> 20:11.120]  hole. We're standing like it's out of control on the edge of a hole inside a deep and dark
[20:11.120 --> 20:18.120]  hole.
[20:41.120 --> 20:48.200]  For you, this was somewhat of a disturbing experience. Will you tell everybody what happened
[20:48.200 --> 20:54.000]  at this stop?
[20:54.000 --> 20:59.600]  He pulled me over and over a mile from the stop sign that he says that I didn't stop
[20:59.600 --> 21:08.360]  appropriately at, and I pulled to the side of the road. He came up. I showed him my
[21:08.360 --> 21:19.880]  identification, but informed him that I did not have to hand it to him. He started calling
[21:19.880 --> 21:30.360]  me a sovereign citizen and speaking into his walkie-talkie radio thing, Yanni Coller, saying
[21:30.360 --> 21:36.840]  we got ourselves a sovereign citizen here. We need backup, which send out units, and
[21:36.840 --> 21:44.480]  then he turned to me and said, we're not playing games here. Are you looking to get arrested
[21:44.480 --> 21:48.040]  tonight because that's what's going to happen if we're going this route or something like
[21:48.040 --> 21:58.480]  that. Then he keeps talking into his walkie basically saying things to make the situation
[21:58.480 --> 22:09.400]  more tense and things. I think we're going more units here just saying stuff. Then at
[22:09.400 --> 22:18.440]  one point he said get out of the car. As far as I understand, I have the right to not get
[22:18.440 --> 22:30.240]  out of the car, but my son was sobbing in the backseat just very audibly and everything.
[22:30.240 --> 22:40.160]  I just thought how upset the kids all of them were. I thought through it and thought, okay,
[22:40.160 --> 22:45.440]  what are the odds that he's going to beat me when I get out of the car? He's probably
[22:45.440 --> 22:52.440]  not going to because we've got four witnesses here. While I was thinking about that, he's
[22:52.440 --> 22:56.960]  like am I going to have to come around there and drag you out of this car because that's
[22:56.960 --> 23:02.800]  where this is going and you're going to get arrested. I looked at him and said, hey, I
[23:02.800 --> 23:12.520]  am taking a minute to think about this. Then I got out of the car. All this time he wouldn't
[23:12.520 --> 23:21.520]  answer any questions that I was asking him. He claimed that he was... Well, he did answer
[23:21.520 --> 23:27.760]  one. I asked him if he was investigating a crime and he said yes. I asked him where the
[23:27.760 --> 23:34.760]  witnesses were and where was the victim. Anyway, he wouldn't tell me why he pulled me over
[23:34.760 --> 23:40.840]  through all of this. He didn't tell me. Like I said, it was a mile away from where he said
[23:40.840 --> 23:45.360]  I had no idea what he was pulling me over for. It could have been anything at that point.
[23:45.360 --> 23:54.520]  Got too close to the white line, got too close to the yellow line, whatever. They do pull
[23:54.520 --> 24:02.920]  people over for anything. I asked him what he pulled me over for and he just filled an
[24:02.920 --> 24:12.840]  answer and he went to his car. Then when he came back, he then told me that he pulled
[24:12.840 --> 24:17.360]  me over for a stop sign and handed me the ticket and said that he wouldn't talk to me
[24:17.360 --> 24:23.600]  about it. That if I wanted to discuss it, then it would be in court.
[24:23.600 --> 24:35.640]  Good. Okay. You did right. I failed the whole thing, honestly. No, no, no, no. You did fine.
[24:35.640 --> 24:42.280]  The place to fight your ticket is not on the street with the police officer. That's in
[24:42.280 --> 24:47.560]  the courts. If he wants to have himself an attitude, we'll show you how to get that attitude
[24:47.560 --> 24:55.440]  adjusted. The very fact, Krista, that you were intimidated by this man standing there
[24:55.440 --> 24:59.320]  acting like he has a God complex and he's wearing a number of deadly weapons all over
[24:59.320 --> 25:06.920]  him, that very fact means you don't have to worry about what it is that you said or did
[25:06.920 --> 25:14.520]  or, oh, but I assented an acquiesce to jurisdiction of, no, no, no, don't worry. Okay.
[25:14.520 --> 25:23.600]  Oh, even better, he cannot show authority to enforce. So next time you get stopped,
[25:23.600 --> 25:29.960]  know that there is all kind of stuff you can do to this guy. He is not going to believe
[25:29.960 --> 25:39.080]  the legal onslaught you're going to bring on him. And once you start after him, he can't
[25:39.080 --> 25:47.120]  talk to you. He can't reason with you. And he could down out there on highway, but he
[25:47.120 --> 25:53.040]  chose not to. Once you start after him, if he attempts to talk to you, you file criminal
[25:53.040 --> 26:02.760]  charges against him for that. You will, we'll work everybody over. The judge, as I understand,
[26:02.760 --> 26:14.480]  is a mentor. He already knows me. I was in court. He asked me who I was. I told him
[26:14.480 --> 26:22.360]  what in his business. He said he wanted to know who I was. And I told Mr. Bailey I arrested
[26:22.360 --> 26:30.560]  this judge for interference by access to a public court. Oh, that was great fun. But
[26:30.560 --> 26:39.680]  he shut up and left me alone. Just told me, don't disturb the courtroom. I wasn't judge.
[26:39.680 --> 26:47.440]  You're the one disturbing me. So he'll know who I am when he sees my name. You have a
[26:47.440 --> 26:54.000]  hearing coming up. We want to take the link to that hearing and send it to everybody out
[26:54.000 --> 27:02.080]  here who would like to sit in on the hearing. We just had, Miss Patty went to a hearing
[27:02.080 --> 27:11.200]  over foreclosure. And you had a bunch of people call in and I was having a little trouble
[27:11.200 --> 27:17.080]  with my sound up when I finally got in. Most everybody was gone. Brett, will you explain
[27:17.080 --> 27:18.080]  what happened?
[27:18.080 --> 27:24.960]  Well, they weren't expecting to have anybody in there except the judge and the lawyer and
[27:24.960 --> 27:31.120]  maybe the judge and the lawyer and Patty. Patty's a homeowner, but she's not really
[27:31.120 --> 27:36.400]  listed on their documents because they were suing the wrong person. So it would have just
[27:36.400 --> 27:43.440]  been the judge and the lawyer. And when a bunch of people started showing up on the
[27:43.440 --> 27:52.160]  Zoom call, the judge decided to kick everybody out. And he had his court coordinator tell
[27:52.160 --> 27:57.040]  everybody, y'all can go and Google, see if you can find it. It'll be something. Go look
[27:57.040 --> 28:05.200]  up on YouTube. Look for 48th District Court on YouTube. And so everybody had to kind of
[28:05.200 --> 28:12.720]  scramble and go find a link where they could see about watching a sort of a live, if they
[28:12.720 --> 28:19.320]  call it live on YouTube, but it's actually a delayed stream. And in the process, he kicked
[28:19.320 --> 28:24.880]  off Patty. He kicked off everybody. It was just him and the lawyer left and then he was
[28:24.880 --> 28:29.480]  realizing what he did and he asked the court coordinator. They ended up bringing Patty
[28:29.480 --> 28:35.720]  back on, but they didn't bring me back on. I was going to be her assistance of counsel.
[28:35.720 --> 28:39.280]  So the judge denied her assistance of counsel.
[28:39.280 --> 28:47.960]  Well, when I finally got in, the first thing the judge, well, I got on and the judge spoke
[28:47.960 --> 28:54.320]  to me directly by name and asked me to drop off here and go to the YouTube channel. And
[28:54.320 --> 28:59.800]  I did that. And when I came on, the first thing the judge did was ask the clerk how
[28:59.800 --> 29:09.760]  many were on the YouTube channel. That was very telling. At the time there were 21s,
[29:09.760 --> 29:16.320]  what the clerk told him. But as I understand, Brett, they went up to 34.
[29:16.320 --> 29:23.640]  I think it was 19 when she answered his question and then it kept on going from there and went
[29:23.640 --> 29:26.600]  up. The highest I saw was 30.
[29:26.600 --> 29:36.040]  So he's got 30 people watching this hearing. He didn't expect anybody. And he actually
[29:36.040 --> 29:46.400]  acted as the judge in the case. Jesus Sponte dismissed the case because they sued the wrong
[29:46.400 --> 29:54.960]  person. And I had never heard of that. The owner of the property had passed away and
[29:54.960 --> 30:02.440]  the daughter received possession of the property.
[30:02.440 --> 30:06.040]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively
[30:06.040 --> 30:10.160]  affected our health? I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with new
[30:10.160 --> 30:15.520]  findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:15.520 --> 30:19.880]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[30:19.880 --> 30:25.520]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.520 --> 30:31.120]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[30:31.120 --> 30:36.800]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:36.800 --> 30:44.640]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.640 --> 30:49.120]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy. It's a fact. But whether it's dangerous to have
[30:49.120 --> 30:53.320]  a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed. Some have blamed
[30:53.320 --> 30:58.120]  it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns. Well, now the journal
[30:58.120 --> 31:03.000]  of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry. The
[31:03.000 --> 31:08.040]  study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest
[31:08.040 --> 31:12.480]  to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on. While researchers aren't
[31:12.480 --> 31:17.120]  sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any chances. I always keep
[31:17.120 --> 31:22.120]  the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More
[31:22.120 --> 31:48.120]  news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:48.120 --> 31:55.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[32:18.120 --> 32:47.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[32:47.120 --> 33:15.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[33:15.120 --> 33:25.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[33:25.120 --> 33:35.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[33:35.120 --> 33:46.560]  He actually brought up an issue that I guess he was technically supposed to. We've never
[33:46.560 --> 33:53.400]  had one do that before. He didn't have subject matter jurisdiction because when they filed
[33:53.400 --> 34:00.960]  this action, they filed it against the dead person, the mother. And the point he made
[34:00.960 --> 34:08.160]  was that you cannot sue an estate. An estate is not a living, breathing human being. You
[34:08.160 --> 34:10.960]  can only sue a person.
[34:10.960 --> 34:14.960]  Well, and in this case, there was no estate.
[34:14.960 --> 34:20.640]  Right. And that's what he said. There was no estate because it didn't go inappropriate.
[34:20.640 --> 34:33.880]  When I said you can sue a person, a corporation, a LLC, these are legal fictions, but they
[34:33.880 --> 34:43.520]  are considered persons under law. A corporation has certain rights. You can't defraud a corporation
[34:43.520 --> 34:52.440]  with impunity because the corporation has certain rights before the courts. He didn't
[34:52.440 --> 34:57.200]  say it exactly that way, but you can only sue a person. He did say you can only see
[34:57.200 --> 35:04.240]  a person, but he didn't define what person meant. It meant not just a living, breathing
[35:04.240 --> 35:13.800]  human being, but also a legal entity. And he said that they sued a dead person. They
[35:13.800 --> 35:21.360]  sued against the estate and you can't sue the estate. And he dismissed it. Suspente.
[35:21.360 --> 35:26.960]  And I listened to that and I was thinking, he did that because so many people were paying
[35:26.960 --> 35:35.680]  attention to him. So Christa, in your case, we want to fill the courtroom, even if it's
[35:35.680 --> 35:47.680]  virtual. Once we got it full, now you're going to demonstrate to them how to wind clocks.
[35:47.680 --> 35:55.680]  You got all these documents? Get all of the ones that go to the court filed with the court.
[35:55.680 --> 36:03.680]  They're somewhere on there. How do you know? Yeah. Wait, say that again? How do I know
[36:03.680 --> 36:08.960]  which ones go to the court? The heading. You'll have a court heading on it. You've got a judicial
[36:08.960 --> 36:15.400]  conduct complaint. I'm sorry. You've got a bar grievance in there for the prosecutor.
[36:15.400 --> 36:22.600]  I'm thinking, I don't know if I have a bar grievance in there or not. I don't remember
[36:22.600 --> 36:26.400]  seeing one, but that doesn't mean anything. Okay. Then I probably don't have one in there
[36:26.400 --> 36:33.000]  yet because we didn't know who the prosecutor is yet. You have a T-call complaint, but see,
[36:33.000 --> 36:39.960]  that's titled Texas Commission on Law Enforcement. If it has a court heading on it, then it goes
[36:39.960 --> 36:50.760]  to the court. If it dates facts, it needs to be verified by a notary. And you look at
[36:50.760 --> 36:56.360]  the bottom of the document, if it has a juror ad on it, a place to notarize it, then you
[36:56.360 --> 37:03.160]  take it to your bank. They'll notarize it for you for free. But the bank in town as well
[37:03.160 --> 37:11.400]  as Fargo, they wouldn't notarize one of my documents once. Just because it was a suit
[37:11.400 --> 37:21.320]  against them, they wouldn't notarize it. Well, that's picky. Anyway, you get notarized. It's
[37:21.320 --> 37:26.640]  not real important if you're out of time or something pilot anyway. If something needs
[37:26.640 --> 37:34.120]  to be verified, the other side has to raise that as an issue. And if they raise it as
[37:34.120 --> 37:39.760]  an issue, you can ask the court to verify, or the court clerk to verify your signature.
[37:39.760 --> 37:43.680]  Be excited in front of the court clerk, and that's taken care of. So they almost never
[37:43.680 --> 37:50.240]  raise that as an issue. And if the prosecutor doesn't raise it as an issue, in the first
[37:50.240 --> 37:56.800]  time it's brought, he weighs it, he can never raise it again. So don't be too concerned
[37:56.800 --> 38:00.960]  about getting it notarized. If you don't have time, just file it anyway. I've never had
[38:00.960 --> 38:08.080]  them complain about it. Okay, get them all filed with the court. Get them filed quickly
[38:08.080 --> 38:17.440]  because they have to be filed at least seven days before hearing. So you get them filed,
[38:17.440 --> 38:27.880]  you can be sure you will not get a response from them. Here's how it works. If you raise
[38:27.880 --> 38:39.400]  an issue, and the opposing side does not rebut your issue, then they agree with you.
[38:39.400 --> 38:44.400]  So if you file these documents, and opposing side does not respond to them, they cannot
[38:44.400 --> 38:50.960]  respond to them in court. What's going to happen is the prosecutor is going to get there,
[38:50.960 --> 38:57.360]  and he's never seen them. This is a traffic court. They never get any documents in a traffic
[38:57.360 --> 39:01.280]  court. So he just comes down to court and they give him all these files. Well, when
[39:01.280 --> 39:09.320]  they bring yours, yours is going to be thicker than his whole stack of files. And he's going
[39:09.320 --> 39:15.200]  to say, where's our list? And he's not going to read it. He won't have time, and won't
[39:15.200 --> 39:21.960]  make any difference because he would have had to have read these before court and prepared
[39:21.960 --> 39:31.600]  a response before court. If he does not prepare a response and send it to you, then he waives
[39:31.600 --> 39:40.520]  any objection to anything you claim, and he may not address them in court. He is subject
[39:40.520 --> 39:58.280]  to collateral estoppel.
[39:58.280 --> 40:14.440]  Essentially, it's collateral estoppel because he agreed to everything in your motions by
[40:14.440 --> 40:23.680]  not filing to them. And once he makes that agreement by not filing a timely response
[40:23.680 --> 40:32.040]  to them, then he is collateral estopped from attacking them because of his capitulation.
[40:32.040 --> 40:37.160]  So if he tries to address them in court, your objection that he's estopped, if he wanted
[40:37.160 --> 40:41.840]  to raise an opposition to these, he needed to do that in a timely manner. He chose not
[40:41.840 --> 40:49.520]  to do so. It's improper for him to address them now. If the judge overruled you, it depends
[40:49.520 --> 40:56.520]  on how feisty you feel at the time. You can ask the bailiff to drag him off the bench
[40:56.520 --> 41:04.200]  and haul him off to jail. But that takes a little getting used to. You've got to handle
[41:04.200 --> 41:09.480]  these guys a few times before you generally get feisty enough to do that. But I can tell
[41:09.480 --> 41:20.000]  you, that is so much fun. I've done that seven times in court and every time the judge sits
[41:20.000 --> 41:26.240]  there and keeps his mouth shut because now you're making criminal accusation against
[41:26.240 --> 41:35.160]  the judge. One word out of him about that, witness tampering and obstruction, both of
[41:35.160 --> 41:40.920]  them felonies. So he's going to keep his mouth shut. But if you're not up to that, that's
[41:40.920 --> 41:48.480]  okay because we can do that afterward. So you asked the judge to dismiss the case because
[41:48.480 --> 41:56.760]  you've challenged subject matter jurisdiction. There's also an in personum jurisdiction
[41:56.760 --> 42:05.120]  challenged in there. Subject matter jurisdiction says not that the court does not have jurisdiction
[42:05.120 --> 42:16.240]  over this type of case, which it does, but that the officer who issued the citation
[42:16.240 --> 42:22.000]  lacked standing to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[42:22.000 --> 42:31.520]  Chris, do you know what I mean by that? Yes. Good. That, yeah, that he's not allowed
[42:31.520 --> 42:40.160]  to take it because I was driving privately or traveling privately, not operating motor
[42:40.160 --> 42:52.720]  vehicle for hire. Exactly. And the citation itself is insufficient on its base as it fails
[42:52.720 --> 43:04.040]  to allege all of the elements of the crime, one of which is transportation. He had to
[43:04.040 --> 43:11.360]  have asked, are you transporting these children for hire or are you transporting any products
[43:11.360 --> 43:19.480]  for hire? If he had noticed that, he doesn't know that and he did not assert that on the
[43:19.480 --> 43:26.240]  traffic ticket because there is no place for it. It's standard that they ignore that.
[43:26.240 --> 43:30.880]  The policeman has no idea, for the most part, that he does not have authority to enforce
[43:30.880 --> 43:38.920]  the transportation code. But whether he does or not, if the prosecutor does not file an
[43:38.920 --> 43:47.000]  answer and I've never had one do that, it doesn't matter because you've made the claim.
[43:47.000 --> 43:52.480]  And they haven't rebutted it. They can't argue against it now. Somebody's waving a pretty
[43:52.480 --> 44:00.600]  girl at me telling me I'm about to run off to Clef again. Randy Kelton, Brett Scotton.
[44:00.600 --> 44:06.640]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.640 --> 44:11.360]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.360 --> 44:17.200]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.200 --> 44:22.480]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[44:22.480 --> 44:27.960]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to
[44:27.960 --> 44:33.240]  endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity
[44:33.240 --> 44:39.120]  so much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many
[44:39.120 --> 44:45.440]  others. When you order from Logos Radio Network dot com, your health will improve as you help
[44:45.440 --> 44:50.800]  support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to
[44:50.800 --> 44:57.200]  join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[44:57.200 --> 45:04.280]  and increase your income. Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.280 --> 45:11.080]  In your case, without an attorney, with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:11.080 --> 45:17.720]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer
[45:17.720 --> 45:23.560]  should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands
[45:23.560 --> 45:29.520]  have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[45:29.520 --> 45:36.560]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[45:36.560 --> 45:41.600]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[45:41.600 --> 45:48.280]  our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[45:48.280 --> 45:55.480]  for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click
[45:55.480 --> 46:02.480]  on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:25.480 --> 46:35.680]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelkin, Brett Felton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Christa
[46:35.680 --> 46:44.160]  in Texas. Brett puts you up as Christy. He'll fix it. Anyway, okay, that pretty girl thing,
[46:44.160 --> 46:49.680]  when I get close to the edge, Brett weighs a picture of his wife at me. He weighed a
[46:49.680 --> 46:53.400]  picture of him once and I just ignored it, so he weighs a picture of his pretty wife
[46:53.400 --> 47:01.880]  at me. That was just my attention. It reminds me not to run off the cliff. Okay, well, guys,
[47:01.880 --> 47:12.880]  we have to keep our priorities straight. Okay, so can I ask a quick question? Go ahead.
[47:12.880 --> 47:19.040]  Is there anything we can go against them for wearing a mask? Because, you know, that kind
[47:19.040 --> 47:28.120]  of increases the, you know, not being able to identify him and everything. Oh, the officer,
[47:28.120 --> 47:35.560]  was he wearing a mask? Yeah, a gator, so it covered everything. No, no, as long as he
[47:35.560 --> 47:43.720]  had his badge and badge number visible, they'll have a name tag and a badge. No, you won't
[47:43.720 --> 47:50.520]  have a claim there. Okay. I mean, maybe in front of a jury, you could talk about that
[47:50.520 --> 47:56.640]  and let them kind of see your point, but as far as what the law requires him to do, you
[47:56.640 --> 48:03.760]  can't really go get it, get him for that. Yeah, there's nothing in law about that. It's
[48:03.760 --> 48:09.240]  something I have to be able to see his face. That's not there. Yeah, there may be something
[48:09.240 --> 48:14.160]  later. Now, it used to be if you wore a mask, then they'd arrest you. They'd consider you
[48:14.160 --> 48:21.800]  a criminal, but with this covert thing, that's all changed. So no, that wouldn't be an issue.
[48:21.800 --> 48:27.600]  What we do here is you file all these documents and they won't respond to them. And when you
[48:27.600 --> 48:36.520]  get to court, the judge will just ignore all of them, but at least be hope he does. Everything's
[48:36.520 --> 48:45.120]  a setup. I have this rule. Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want
[48:45.120 --> 48:51.160]  them to do because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does
[48:51.160 --> 48:58.320]  not compel them to do. So in this case, you challenge subject matter jurisdiction first.
[48:58.320 --> 49:05.280]  And that's a big deal because subject matter jurisdiction is threshold. The judge can't
[49:05.280 --> 49:12.360]  get to the merits until he gets across the threshold. When you've come before the court
[49:12.360 --> 49:19.320]  initially, you might want to tell the court when they start that you are here at arms
[49:19.320 --> 49:27.560]  length to the court, meaning you're not stepping inside their jurisdiction as yet. You have
[49:27.560 --> 49:34.320]  a subject matter jurisdiction challenge before the court, and that must be heard first. And
[49:34.320 --> 49:41.600]  the judge will get it and he'll just deny it. Well, here's what the case law says, Packer
[49:41.600 --> 49:51.080]  V Walker. A judge has no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts of failure
[49:51.080 --> 50:01.160]  to do so is an abuse of discretion. If a public official abuses his discretion and in the process
[50:01.160 --> 50:06.760]  denies a citizen in the full free access to enjoyment, right? Well, that's a crime in
[50:06.760 --> 50:14.080]  every state, even if a judge does it. Now, they're not accustomed to someone filing criminally
[50:14.080 --> 50:22.640]  against them for their bad behavior. But you're not there dangling by your bar card, like
[50:22.640 --> 50:28.440]  the prosecutor is. The prosecutor is going to be really, really careful what he does
[50:28.440 --> 50:36.440]  because he wants to judge upset at him. Lawyers believe that judges can sanction them at their
[50:36.440 --> 50:46.120]  caprice. And they are right. They can. They generally don't. But they can. And the fact
[50:46.120 --> 50:54.440]  that the tan terrifies lawyers. So even if you hire a lawyer, he's not going to do anything
[50:54.440 --> 51:02.920]  to annoy that judge. Because he's afraid that if he annoys the judge in this case, then
[51:02.920 --> 51:08.200]  you win your case. Then his next five or six class, the judge is going to rule against
[51:08.200 --> 51:17.920]  them out of hand to pay him back. And they absolutely won't do that. So he's not going
[51:17.920 --> 51:26.960]  to expect you to take him on. And in this case, the lawyer, I mean, the judge is a lawyer.
[51:26.960 --> 51:38.000]  So that makes him even more vulnerable. Because you can look him up on the state bar association.
[51:38.000 --> 51:43.760]  One thing, Brett, the last time I looked up lawyers for just this week, they had the
[51:43.760 --> 51:50.720]  lawyer's name and address, but no bar card number. We don't talk about that on Texas
[51:50.720 --> 51:59.760]  bar. Yeah. No bar card number. I haven't seen that change. So that must be recent. But we
[51:59.760 --> 52:04.800]  don't care. We just bought it by name. Well, I went in. I was looking up all the lawyers
[52:04.800 --> 52:11.920]  who represented people in criminal actions and bar grieving them for not filing a subject
[52:11.920 --> 52:17.560]  matter jurisdiction challenge because there was no 1617 order. And a couple of them, I
[52:17.560 --> 52:27.640]  got the wrong lawyer cost of a more than one by the name. And one of them I just left there.
[52:27.640 --> 52:38.320]  Are you saying you bar grieve some random person? Yeah, wrong one on purpose. Oh, my bad. I
[52:38.320 --> 52:45.440]  meant to bar grieve this other mark, whatever. Sorry about that. Okay, Christy, you know
[52:45.440 --> 52:55.040]  what happens when you bar grieve a lawyer? It goes a mark against them for their instruments.
[52:55.040 --> 53:02.320]  Exactly. So it don't make any difference if it's valid invalid. The bar is going to throw
[53:02.320 --> 53:08.480]  it in the trash, but it's going to sting him. So I'm going to sting a lawyer that has nothing
[53:08.480 --> 53:18.640]  to do with this. And he's going to be furious at the lawyer who did this. It's all about
[53:18.640 --> 53:25.240]  politics. Let's see if we can't set them against each other. We want the lawyers jumping up
[53:25.240 --> 53:33.160]  and down and railing and right to send the nation. This is a primary weakness of lawyers.
[53:33.160 --> 53:40.320]  So we bar grieve them at every opportunity. This prosecutor have to understand a prosecutor
[53:40.320 --> 53:52.560]  in a little tiny podunk municipality. What is he doing down there in the traffic court?
[53:52.560 --> 53:58.480]  He obviously is not the sharpest knife in the drawer because if he was, he'd be out
[53:58.480 --> 54:04.560]  making the big bucks. He wouldn't be down here at the municipalities grubbing for dollars.
[54:04.560 --> 54:11.360]  And what we get in traffic court are either brand new lawyers just out of law school who
[54:11.360 --> 54:22.120]  didn't get picked up by a law firm. So they got 160 to $180,000 student loan to pay off.
[54:22.120 --> 54:27.200]  They got to find a way to raise some money. So if the lawyer firm picks them up, they
[54:27.200 --> 54:33.680]  don't know how to practice law. That's not taught in law school. They know they're taught
[54:33.680 --> 54:41.480]  how to argue legal issues, but not how to prepare motions, file motions, get a motion
[54:41.480 --> 54:46.560]  set for hearing, how to deal with judges. All this stuff you learn in the practice
[54:46.560 --> 54:54.520]  of law. So if they don't get a law firm to pick them up or don't wind up with a mentor
[54:54.520 --> 54:59.360]  or someone who can feed them clients, they go down and try to get on as a municipal court
[54:59.360 --> 55:06.960]  prosecutor. And then the municipal court judge will show them the ropes, teach them how to
[55:06.960 --> 55:16.960]  do everything. I went to Southlake brand new lawyer her first day on her own. 26 year old
[55:16.960 --> 55:27.440]  lawyer. I filed 58 felony charges against her. Welcome to the deep end of the pool.
[55:27.440 --> 55:32.600]  But I didn't bar grieve her because she's brand new and I didn't want to ruin her career.
[55:32.600 --> 55:38.880]  I just wanted to get her attention. So here you're in a small municipality. You've got
[55:38.880 --> 55:45.880]  a judge here that mentors an older judge. He's about to retire from a lawyer. I don't
[55:45.880 --> 55:52.920]  know if he still practices or not, but I think he still has a bar card. Excuse me. So he's
[55:52.920 --> 55:58.720]  speaking for his bar card. That's going to make him really, really unhappy. This goes
[55:58.720 --> 56:06.200]  to something that you need to understand about judges. I mentioned earlier that a judge has
[56:06.200 --> 56:12.600]  no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts. You don't care what that judge
[56:12.600 --> 56:21.760]  does. You never expect to win your case in the trial court. You expect to win your case
[56:21.760 --> 56:27.600]  on appeal. So your only purpose in that court is to set the record for appeal. And if that's
[56:27.600 --> 56:36.160]  why you're there, they will figure that out relatively quickly and make some more concern.
[56:36.160 --> 56:41.640]  When they see all these documents, they'll know you're setting them up for appeal. So
[56:41.640 --> 56:46.040]  they're looking to make a couple hundred bucks on this ticket, but they know it's going
[56:46.040 --> 56:52.920]  to cost them umpteen thousand before they get through your appeals. They think you're
[56:52.920 --> 56:58.560]  a sovereign citizen and they've been there with sovereign citizens before. Those sovereign
[56:58.560 --> 57:05.960]  citizens drag them through the courts and cause them a fortune. So you let them know
[57:05.960 --> 57:10.160]  that you're going to be one of those sovereign citizens that drag them through the courts
[57:10.160 --> 57:13.880]  and cause them a fortune. When in fact you're not the sovereign citizen, the policeman's
[57:13.880 --> 57:20.560]  one that's a sovereign citizen. At least he thinks he is. He's a citizen and he thinks
[57:20.560 --> 57:27.480]  he's sovereign. Sovereign citizen is actually a contradiction of terms, but that's something
[57:27.480 --> 57:35.680]  they use to disparage people with. Yeah, and to support their theory that you're a terrorist
[57:35.680 --> 57:45.040]  and he needs backup. And you, okay, we will get to that part. You maintain he called for
[57:45.040 --> 57:57.360]  backup to frighten your children and he did. And we'll make a separate T. Cole complaint.
[57:57.360 --> 58:04.000]  One from each of the children and one from you for him. Conducting him itself in a way
[58:04.000 --> 58:09.720]  that terrifies the children. We don't put people out there with pistols on their hips
[58:09.720 --> 58:19.240]  so they can terrorize our children. This will give him four professional conduct complaints
[58:19.240 --> 58:25.920]  so far. And you're just getting warmed up on him. Hang on. Randy Kelkin, Brett Fountain,
[58:25.920 --> 58:30.280]  we were on radio. I'm not going to give out the calling number. We've got a full board
[58:30.280 --> 58:35.960]  of callers, but we'll be taking your calls all night. As soon as someone drops off, we
[58:35.960 --> 58:41.480]  can only hold four on the board at one time. So as soon as one drops off, then if you have
[58:41.480 --> 58:50.320]  a question or comment, give us a call. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[58:50.320 --> 58:55.320]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America
[58:55.320 --> 59:00.960]  is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.960 --> 59:05.280]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.280 --> 59:09.920]  today. It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.920 --> 59:15.100]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three-volume
[59:15.100 --> 59:20.320]  set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements
[59:20.320 --> 59:26.040]  of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how
[59:26.040 --> 59:32.240]  to build up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements
[59:32.240 --> 59:45.240]  of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.240 --> 59:49.680]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.680 --> 01:00:04.520]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:04.520 --> 01:00:07.200]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown. Markets for Monday,
[01:00:07.200 --> 01:00:14.640]  the 22nd of July, 2019, open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce, silver, $16.45
[01:00:14.640 --> 01:00:22.560]  an ounce, copper, $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude, $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude, $62.47
[01:00:22.560 --> 01:00:31.080]  an ounce, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core, $10,566.52, Ethereum, $227.26,
[01:00:31.080 --> 01:00:46.080]  XRP, Ripple, $0.33, Litecoin, $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:46.080 --> 01:00:52.280]  Today in History, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[01:00:52.280 --> 01:00:57.600]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[01:00:57.600 --> 01:01:04.600]  10 and injuring 40.
[01:01:04.600 --> 01:01:09.280]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing HEPA into
[01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:14.080]  taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin,
[01:01:14.080 --> 01:01:17.920]  and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:01:17.920 --> 01:01:22.080]  new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:01:22.080 --> 01:01:26.920]  equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney
[01:01:26.920 --> 01:01:31.000]  announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery
[01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:33.560]  of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:33.560 --> 01:01:37.440]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:01:37.440 --> 01:01:41.960]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:41.960 --> 01:01:48.120]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:01:48.120 --> 01:01:54.360]  well as other cities too, like the district attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:01:54.360 --> 01:01:58.840]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:01:58.840 --> 01:02:01.680]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.680 --> 01:02:06.600]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[01:02:06.600 --> 01:02:10.600]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[01:02:10.600 --> 01:02:13.360]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.360 --> 01:02:17.240]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[01:02:17.240 --> 01:02:22.440]  charged with.
[01:02:22.440 --> 01:02:27.120]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark
[01:02:27.120 --> 01:02:32.240]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[01:02:32.240 --> 01:02:37.880]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[01:02:37.880 --> 01:02:39.040]  Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.040 --> 01:02:43.680]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[01:02:43.680 --> 01:02:49.920]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[01:02:49.920 --> 01:02:54.920]  flow.
[01:02:54.920 --> 01:03:21.920]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and it says he cares not over
[01:03:21.920 --> 01:03:28.920]  the shark.
[01:03:28.920 --> 01:03:43.480]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:43.480 --> 01:03:48.440]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rural Law Radio, and I'm talking to Krista in Texas.
[01:03:48.440 --> 01:03:55.760]  And Krista, if it sounds like we're having a lot of fun doing this, I'm going to bring
[01:03:55.760 --> 01:03:56.760]  somebody else on.
[01:03:56.760 --> 01:03:57.760]  Bob?
[01:03:57.760 --> 01:03:58.760]  Yes, sir?
[01:03:58.760 --> 01:04:01.760]  Tell her about it.
[01:04:01.760 --> 01:04:03.760]  Hey, guys.
[01:04:03.760 --> 01:04:12.760]  Bob's in California and you're taking on what, the city of Riverside?
[01:04:12.760 --> 01:04:14.760]  Hang on.
[01:04:14.760 --> 01:04:26.200]  No, it's not the city of Riverside, it's the city of Pittsburgh, California.
[01:04:26.200 --> 01:04:29.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:34.520]  And Bob took them on just to have a fight.
[01:04:34.520 --> 01:04:36.520]  How's that going for you, Bob?
[01:04:36.520 --> 01:04:39.200]  Well, I think it's going pretty good.
[01:04:39.200 --> 01:04:49.840]  It was a traffic ticket where the judge decided he didn't want me to have call witnesses cross
[01:04:49.840 --> 01:04:54.200]  examine the police officer or interevidence.
[01:04:54.200 --> 01:05:04.840]  So I appealed the case and today I had my oral argument and the judge said that I didn't
[01:05:04.840 --> 01:05:11.600]  have to say anything that he would take it into submission and give a ruling within a
[01:05:11.600 --> 01:05:13.520]  couple of weeks.
[01:05:13.520 --> 01:05:22.440]  And when I asked him if the ruling would come with conclusions and facts, conclusions in
[01:05:22.440 --> 01:05:28.320]  law, he informed me that he wouldn't be interviewed.
[01:05:28.320 --> 01:05:35.400]  Did you ask him to dismiss for summary judgment?
[01:05:35.400 --> 01:05:45.200]  Yes, and he said because it was a traffic ticket that there would be no summary judgment.
[01:05:45.200 --> 01:05:46.200]  Good.
[01:05:46.200 --> 01:05:50.600]  He was a summary judge.
[01:05:50.600 --> 01:05:58.760]  So you get to file a judicial conduct complaint on him for that and ask for findings of facts
[01:05:58.760 --> 01:06:07.240]  and conclusions in law and then file a judicial conduct complaint against him for denying
[01:06:07.240 --> 01:06:11.600]  you your right to summary judgment.
[01:06:11.600 --> 01:06:16.640]  And then maybe reach out with an interlocutory appeal to the next judge up and say, will
[01:06:16.640 --> 01:06:19.360]  you please get this judge into control?
[01:06:19.360 --> 01:06:29.120]  I need you to tell him about what naturally could be a mandamus as well, but to say where
[01:06:29.120 --> 01:06:33.920]  is the authority for denying summary judgment?
[01:06:33.920 --> 01:06:38.720]  Okay, Christo, mandamus.
[01:06:38.720 --> 01:06:44.840]  A mandamus is a document that you file with the court of appeals or if it's a court of
[01:06:44.840 --> 01:06:48.680]  appeals then you file it with the Supreme.
[01:06:48.680 --> 01:06:57.320]  Then you ask the court to order a lower court to do something they're required to do.
[01:06:57.320 --> 01:07:06.080]  An interlocutory appeal is where you have a ruling that if it's ruled in your favor
[01:07:06.080 --> 01:07:13.040]  and it would end the case, which in this case you're asking for summary judgment.
[01:07:13.040 --> 01:07:20.320]  What happened was Bob filed these documents, the other side didn't respond to them.
[01:07:20.320 --> 01:07:27.760]  When you file a motion or pleading, the judge must take your statements as true, not prima
[01:07:27.760 --> 01:07:35.640]  facie, but true, unless they are rebutted by opposing side.
[01:07:35.640 --> 01:07:43.760]  The opposing side did not rebut, then they're stopped, and we spoke about this earlier, didn't
[01:07:43.760 --> 01:07:44.760]  we Brett?
[01:07:44.760 --> 01:07:45.760]  Yes, yes.
[01:07:45.760 --> 01:07:46.760]  Okay.
[01:07:46.760 --> 01:07:54.000]  Then they can't come into court without it, if they didn't give you notice, because in
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:08:03.160]  a criminal case that would be surprise and lawyers are not allowed to surprise one another.
[01:08:03.160 --> 01:08:09.720]  You could either, an interlocutory is when it would end the case, and you do that for
[01:08:09.720 --> 01:08:12.200]  judicial economy.
[01:08:12.200 --> 01:08:17.080]  This should end the case and it would be waste everybody's time and money adjudicating this
[01:08:17.080 --> 01:08:20.680]  whole issue when that ruling would end it.
[01:08:20.680 --> 01:08:23.480]  That's ripe for interlocutory appeal.
[01:08:23.480 --> 01:08:24.480]  Okay.
[01:08:24.480 --> 01:08:32.840]  The main thing about Bob, the problem with Bob is he just has too much fun.
[01:08:32.840 --> 01:08:39.240]  Sometimes when he's on, he's chuckling too much, he's having trouble telling us what
[01:08:39.240 --> 01:08:43.000]  he's doing to him because he's having too much fun with it.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:49.080]  I wanted you to hear Bob, because we've got a number of people around that have come
[01:08:49.080 --> 01:08:57.960]  to realize that these courts are not quite so authoritative and frightening as we tend
[01:08:57.960 --> 01:09:03.120]  to believe when we've never been in them before.
[01:09:03.120 --> 01:09:09.720]  I was in Lake Worth and I had a judge's really cantankerous old buzzard and he got smart
[01:09:09.720 --> 01:09:16.600]  with me and I asked the bailiff to drag him off the bench and he instructed the bailiff
[01:09:16.600 --> 01:09:18.680]  that he wasn't dragging anybody anywhere.
[01:09:18.680 --> 01:09:22.000]  I said, well, that's okay, judge.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:24.800]  I had to ask, he had to refuse.
[01:09:24.800 --> 01:09:26.280]  We'll handle this elsewhere.
[01:09:26.280 --> 01:09:31.280]  Well, all of a sudden, the judge found his nice side.
[01:09:31.280 --> 01:09:33.600]  All that stuff went away.
[01:09:33.600 --> 01:09:39.960]  There are used to people coming before them who are shaking in their boots and terrified.
[01:09:39.960 --> 01:09:44.600]  I think I figured out why.
[01:09:44.600 --> 01:09:52.960]  We spend 12 years in a government mandated school system and that is our generally most
[01:09:52.960 --> 01:10:01.200]  people's only interaction with public officials is through school and in that school system
[01:10:01.200 --> 01:10:05.840]  they tell you what great and wonderful rights you have in this free country.
[01:10:05.840 --> 01:10:13.360]  However, while you're in this school, don't even think about trying to express those rights
[01:10:13.360 --> 01:10:18.320]  because the whole weight of the system will fall right square on your head.
[01:10:18.320 --> 01:10:24.120]  Our children get out of that 12 years of indoctrination and we expect them to all of a sudden
[01:10:24.120 --> 01:10:26.960]  become empowered citizens.
[01:10:26.960 --> 01:10:31.480]  Well, most of you never have any action with the court.
[01:10:31.480 --> 01:10:39.760]  So the first time you're called into court, you look inside for a response set that you
[01:10:39.760 --> 01:10:41.440]  can use dealing with public officials.
[01:10:41.440 --> 01:10:44.800]  The only thing you got is school.
[01:10:44.800 --> 01:10:51.240]  I go into court and I see these people who are absolutely terrified and that's because
[01:10:51.240 --> 01:10:57.280]  I'm looking at a sixth grader being sent to the principal.
[01:10:57.280 --> 01:11:00.160]  It's not appropriate once we're grown.
[01:11:00.160 --> 01:11:08.880]  The whole purpose of this show is to help people juxtapose being sent to the principal
[01:11:08.880 --> 01:11:15.600]  with being a parent going to the principal wanting to know what the heck are you doing
[01:11:15.600 --> 01:11:16.600]  to my kids.
[01:11:16.600 --> 01:11:22.800]  That is a much more appropriate response set and I can tell you it is great fun.
[01:11:22.800 --> 01:11:27.000]  They have no idea how to deal with you.
[01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:33.520]  When you step right square in the middle and don't back up from them, I have never been
[01:11:33.520 --> 01:11:39.840]  charged with contempt of court and I stand right in the middle of them and they find
[01:11:39.840 --> 01:11:40.840]  out real quick.
[01:11:40.840 --> 01:11:48.200]  They realize real quick what I did in South Fort Worth before the J.P. down there when
[01:11:48.200 --> 01:11:49.200]  the pros...
[01:11:49.200 --> 01:11:54.560]  It was a foreclosure here and we were trying to stop a foreclosure of some eviction for
[01:11:54.560 --> 01:11:59.240]  somebody else and the lawyer on the other side out already barred grief and she was
[01:11:59.240 --> 01:12:01.240]  furious.
[01:12:01.240 --> 01:12:03.840]  And she said, Mr. Keltner, you're an attorney.
[01:12:03.840 --> 01:12:07.360]  Normally I don't talk to the lawyers, they don't talk to me.
[01:12:07.360 --> 01:12:09.680]  If you've got something to say, you say to the judge.
[01:12:09.680 --> 01:12:17.400]  But in this case I told her no, I sleep well at night and I keep my hands in my own pockets
[01:12:17.400 --> 01:12:26.160]  and I turn to the judge and said, besides, I'm not here dangling by my bar card.
[01:12:26.160 --> 01:12:30.280]  And that was for the judge and he knew exactly what I was telling him.
[01:12:30.280 --> 01:12:35.280]  Yeah, you mess with me and me and you will go to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct
[01:12:35.280 --> 01:12:39.520]  and you'll explain it to them.
[01:12:39.520 --> 01:12:48.120]  You are the most powerful person in the room and they will do everything they can to keep
[01:12:48.120 --> 01:12:53.040]  you from knowing you're the most powerful person in the room.
[01:12:53.040 --> 01:12:57.720]  You get all these documents filed, if you've read them, that's great.
[01:12:57.720 --> 01:13:04.360]  If you don't understand anything, let me know, I'll do my best to explain it.
[01:13:04.360 --> 01:13:08.240]  But at the end of the day, it doesn't make any difference.
[01:13:08.240 --> 01:13:16.800]  You filed them, they're before the court and you can be sure that the judge, even if he
[01:13:16.800 --> 01:13:21.840]  reads them, he's most likely not going to understand them.
[01:13:21.840 --> 01:13:28.080]  The reason being is we're giving him the law to show that what he's been doing his entire
[01:13:28.080 --> 01:13:31.800]  career is illegal.
[01:13:31.800 --> 01:13:37.040]  And he's going to do like every other public official I've dealt with, they're going to
[01:13:37.040 --> 01:13:42.400]  reduce themselves to cognitive dissonance.
[01:13:42.400 --> 01:13:48.680]  One of my favorite human beings, Mark Autry, he was a JP in the town I live in.
[01:13:48.680 --> 01:13:52.760]  He does my opinion that Mark Autry would do what he believes is right if it heralyped
[01:13:52.760 --> 01:13:54.640]  the pope.
[01:13:54.640 --> 01:13:58.560]  When I showed all of this to him, he said, Mr. Kelkin, are you telling me that what
[01:13:58.560 --> 01:14:04.120]  I did is 20 years as a sheriff's deputy, he was a captain on the sheriff's department.
[01:14:04.120 --> 01:14:10.120]  And then 12 years as a justice of the peace and what everybody else in Texas has been
[01:14:10.120 --> 01:14:16.280]  doing for as long as I've been around is wrong and you're right.
[01:14:16.280 --> 01:14:19.560]  I said, don't ask me, Mark.
[01:14:19.560 --> 01:14:20.800]  I just read the code.
[01:14:20.800 --> 01:14:22.200]  I didn't write it.
[01:14:22.200 --> 01:14:23.200]  Here it is.
[01:14:23.200 --> 01:14:25.440]  You can read it just like I did.
[01:14:25.440 --> 01:14:35.200]  He simply could not accept the fact that what they had been doing all this time was wrong.
[01:14:35.200 --> 01:14:37.200]  That's been the hurdle I've been trying to overcome.
[01:14:37.200 --> 01:14:40.040]  Now that's what you're going to run into with this judge.
[01:14:40.040 --> 01:14:43.440]  No matter what you put in there, he is not going to believe it.
[01:14:43.440 --> 01:14:50.040]  He's been doing things the same way for his entire career and he's not about to change
[01:14:50.040 --> 01:14:51.040]  now.
[01:14:51.040 --> 01:14:59.360]  Well, maybe his entire career he hadn't had pro se litigants trying to get him arrested.
[01:14:59.360 --> 01:15:05.280]  Bargreevy, judicial conduct, complaints against him and suing him personally.
[01:15:05.280 --> 01:15:13.120]  This subject matter jurisdiction challenge, that is a big deal because if he fails to
[01:15:13.120 --> 01:15:19.120]  address every issue in that subject matter jurisdiction challenge, then he doesn't have
[01:15:19.120 --> 01:15:25.440]  subject matter jurisdiction and if he doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction, he has zero
[01:15:25.440 --> 01:15:28.440]  immunity.
[01:15:28.440 --> 01:15:30.280]  That's what they count on.
[01:15:30.280 --> 01:15:39.600]  The one thing that will get him around official immunity is no subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:15:39.600 --> 01:15:42.280]  Second document you have in there.
[01:15:42.280 --> 01:15:46.800]  It is a challenge to impersonal jurisdiction.
[01:15:46.800 --> 01:15:50.360]  That one's labeled special appearance.
[01:15:50.360 --> 01:15:57.640]  The special appearance says even if you have subject matter jurisdiction, even if you maintain
[01:15:57.640 --> 01:16:05.480]  that the officer provided sufficient information to give you jurisdiction in the case, you
[01:16:05.480 --> 01:16:14.800]  don't have jurisdiction over me, the person because I was that I don't fall within the
[01:16:14.800 --> 01:16:18.280]  statutory scheme.
[01:16:18.280 --> 01:16:24.600]  That one's also a threshold issue if he he'll just ignore it.
[01:16:24.600 --> 01:16:30.480]  But that leaves him without immunity to the next thing he gets is a tort letter.
[01:16:30.480 --> 01:16:36.080]  Well, I don't get him jumping up and down and waving his arms and railing in righteous
[01:16:36.080 --> 01:16:37.080]  indignation.
[01:16:37.080 --> 01:16:45.760]  Okay, when we come back, I'm going to stop preaching and I want to I want some questions
[01:16:45.760 --> 01:16:46.760]  from now on.
[01:16:46.760 --> 01:16:51.440]  I want to know what you don't understand, what you're confused about, what you need clarification
[01:16:51.440 --> 01:16:52.440]  on.
[01:16:52.440 --> 01:17:00.200]  Hang on, Randy Kelkin, Brett Fountain, root of our radio, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.200 --> 01:17:05.480]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.480 --> 01:17:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.320]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:17:13.320 --> 01:17:14.320]  can win two.
[01:17:14.320 --> 01:17:19.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.120 --> 01:17:20.800]  civil rights statute.
[01:17:20.800 --> 01:17:24.440]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons?
[01:17:24.440 --> 01:17:26.440]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.440 --> 01:17:29.080]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:29.080 --> 01:17:33.760]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:17:33.760 --> 01:17:38.880]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:46.560]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner
[01:17:46.560 --> 01:17:49.480]  or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.480 --> 01:17:57.240]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.240 --> 01:18:00.160]  How to learn how to stop debt collectors now?
[01:18:00.160 --> 01:18:01.160]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.160 --> 01:18:04.680]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.680 --> 01:18:07.360]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.360 --> 01:18:08.560]  I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.560 --> 01:18:13.160]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.160 --> 01:18:17.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:20.360]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.360 --> 01:18:21.920]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.920 --> 01:18:23.760]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:23.760 --> 01:18:26.960]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:26.960 --> 01:18:31.440]  But ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.440 --> 01:18:37.480]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.480 --> 01:18:43.440]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.440 --> 01:18:44.440]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.440 --> 01:18:45.440]  No.
[01:18:45.440 --> 01:18:47.240]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.240 --> 01:18:48.240]  No.
[01:18:48.240 --> 01:18:49.240]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.240 --> 01:18:50.240]  No.
[01:18:50.240 --> 01:18:51.240]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.240 --> 01:18:55.920]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:55.920 --> 01:18:56.920]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.920 --> 01:18:57.920]  We are welcome.
[01:18:57.920 --> 01:19:00.720]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[01:19:00.720 --> 01:19:07.720]  the logos, the radios, the net videos, the net videos
[01:19:07.720 --> 01:19:10.720]  the radios, the net videos
[01:19:10.720 --> 01:19:16.720]  ain't gonna blind me
[01:19:16.720 --> 01:19:22.720]  don't bore me
[01:19:22.720 --> 01:19:30.720]  yeah
[01:19:30.720 --> 01:19:35.720]  ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:19:35.720 --> 01:19:37.720]  I was blinded by that
[01:19:37.720 --> 01:19:44.720]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Louis La Radio, and we're talking to Krista in Texas
[01:19:44.720 --> 01:19:49.720]  Okay, Krista, what questions do you have for us?
[01:19:49.720 --> 01:20:02.720]  I guess basically I want to know what the outcome of the day would be
[01:20:02.720 --> 01:20:11.720]  What the outcome of this hearing is supposed to be a trial? Before they can get to trial?
[01:20:11.720 --> 01:20:20.720]  Oh, wait, let me step back. Have they had you talk to a lawyer, the prosecutor yet?
[01:20:20.720 --> 01:20:24.720]  No
[01:20:24.720 --> 01:20:27.720]  That's what they're gonna want to do here
[01:20:27.720 --> 01:20:30.720]  Okay, they have a problem
[01:20:30.720 --> 01:20:34.720]  They ordered you to court
[01:20:34.720 --> 01:20:41.720]  And let me go back, I think it said it was a trial docket
[01:20:41.720 --> 01:20:43.720]  Yes
[01:20:43.720 --> 01:20:45.720]  So they have to be ready for trial
[01:20:45.720 --> 01:20:51.720]  Oh, plea docket, a plea docket, and another place that referred to it as a pre-trial
[01:20:51.720 --> 01:20:56.720]  Oh, okay, they can't do that
[01:20:56.720 --> 01:20:59.720]  Wow, a plea docket
[01:20:59.720 --> 01:21:06.720]  A plea docket, that's gonna be you go talk to the prosecutor
[01:21:06.720 --> 01:21:10.720]  And the prosecutor's gonna want to make a deal
[01:21:10.720 --> 01:21:15.720]  Oh, this could be so much fun. If we can get a whole bunch of people on
[01:21:15.720 --> 01:21:27.720]  Then when they direct you to the lawyer, what I always tell them is, oh, the persecuting attorney, I don't talk to persecuting attorneys
[01:21:27.720 --> 01:21:30.720]  Here's what the law says
[01:21:30.720 --> 01:21:38.720]  Under 28.01, Texas Court of Criminal Procedure, the court can order you to appear in court
[01:21:38.720 --> 01:21:43.720]  And there are 11, 11 things they can order you to come to court for
[01:21:43.720 --> 01:21:48.720]  The first one is a arraignment hearing
[01:21:48.720 --> 01:21:55.720]  The other 10, all reference motions or pleadings filed with the court
[01:21:55.720 --> 01:21:58.720]  But there are no motions or pleadings filed with the court
[01:21:58.720 --> 01:22:03.720]  So the only thing they could order you to court for is an arraignment hearing
[01:22:03.720 --> 01:22:07.720]  Problem, you're charged with a Class C misdemeanor
[01:22:07.720 --> 01:22:12.720]  Chapter 26 addresses arraignments
[01:22:12.720 --> 01:22:20.720]  26.01, first one says an arraignment may be held in the matter of a felony
[01:22:20.720 --> 01:22:27.720]  Or a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment
[01:22:27.720 --> 01:22:32.720]  What part of that is hard to understand?
[01:22:32.720 --> 01:22:49.720]  Why on earth did the legislature go to this extreme to limit arraignment hearings to felonies and misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment?
[01:22:49.720 --> 01:22:54.720]  I have no idea why they would do that
[01:22:54.720 --> 01:22:57.720]  But they did that
[01:22:57.720 --> 01:23:07.720]  So if the judge has ordered you to court for a plea docket
[01:23:07.720 --> 01:23:21.720]  And 26.02 says an arraignment may be held for the purpose of identifying the accused and taking a plea
[01:23:21.720 --> 01:23:28.720]  If they order you to court for that, that's humiliating legal process and that's crime in the state of Texas
[01:23:28.720 --> 01:23:36.720]  So you already got that
[01:23:36.720 --> 01:23:45.720]  What's going to happen is when you get there, when you get in the court, he's going to suggest that you meet with the prosecutor
[01:23:45.720 --> 01:23:54.720]  And you tell him if the prosecutor wants to meet with me, well he can call me and set an appointment at a time and place that's convenient to me
[01:23:54.720 --> 01:23:57.720]  This is not that time or place
[01:23:57.720 --> 01:24:03.720]  And now they're going to be tripping over the tongues, they're not going to know what to do
[01:24:03.720 --> 01:24:08.720]  And you inform the court that you have motions and pleadings before the court
[01:24:08.720 --> 01:24:18.720]  Since the only authority you have to convene a hearing is chapter 28, we have motions, let's hear the motions
[01:24:18.720 --> 01:24:24.720]  What do you think, Krista?
[01:24:24.720 --> 01:24:33.720]  Well, it sounds like a lot to remember and take care of
[01:24:33.720 --> 01:24:38.720]  Okay, okay, it is and you're going to screw it up
[01:24:38.720 --> 01:24:43.720]  Who cares? That doesn't matter
[01:24:43.720 --> 01:24:48.720]  First time in court you're going to screw things up
[01:24:48.720 --> 01:24:56.720]  Me, I got really good at it about 30, I'm a slow learner
[01:24:56.720 --> 01:24:59.720]  You guys good at screwing things up?
[01:24:59.720 --> 01:25:01.720]  Yeah, I'm good at that, I'm good at that
[01:25:01.720 --> 01:25:04.720]  I still screw things up in court
[01:25:04.720 --> 01:25:07.720]  Don't worry about it, not a problem
[01:25:07.720 --> 01:25:11.720]  You do all your work in the motions and pleadings
[01:25:11.720 --> 01:25:19.720]  The only thing, they start out, they're going to want you to talk to prosecutors and say, no, no, I don't talk to prosecutors in terms
[01:25:19.720 --> 01:25:27.720]  And if they're, then you ask them, tell them you've got motions before the court and you want them to hear the motions
[01:25:27.720 --> 01:25:39.720]  If they don't hear the motions, they're going to do the prosecutors and say, wow, I didn't see these motions, these pleadings until I got here today
[01:25:39.720 --> 01:25:43.720]  And you tell me, your problem, not my problem
[01:25:43.720 --> 01:25:50.720]  You're the one that ordered me here on the threat of being arrested, you have a duty to be ready and expecting to be ready
[01:25:50.720 --> 01:25:55.720]  If he's not, judge, you have it right to summer judgment, just dismiss this whole thing
[01:25:55.720 --> 01:26:00.720]  And he's going to refuse, all you're there for is to set the record
[01:26:00.720 --> 01:26:05.720]  You've already set the record by filing the documents
[01:26:05.720 --> 01:26:08.720]  Nothing you can screw up
[01:26:08.720 --> 01:26:13.720]  Don't worry about it, everything you need to do is already done
[01:26:13.720 --> 01:26:20.720]  I've heard that I have to mention them, or maybe, or to get...
[01:26:20.720 --> 01:26:28.720]  You know, I don't know, is that true that you have to bring them up in court or they can kind of ignore them?
[01:26:28.720 --> 01:26:33.720]  Yeah, you have to get them to, and it's not hard, you know, they're going to call a hearing
[01:26:33.720 --> 01:26:40.720]  The judge is going to try to ask you to meet with the lawyer and you're going to object to that
[01:26:40.720 --> 01:26:47.720]  The thing you want to tell them, I am here at arm's length to the court
[01:26:47.720 --> 01:26:51.720]  The judge may or may not know what that means
[01:26:51.720 --> 01:27:00.720]  If you can set Zoom to record, so you get a recording of the hearing
[01:27:00.720 --> 01:27:05.720]  Tell them you're at arm's length to the court, you go into the courtroom and you walk up to the bar
[01:27:05.720 --> 01:27:08.720]  And you stop right there
[01:27:08.720 --> 01:27:15.720]  You're not passing the bar, you're in a virtual hearing, but in this virtual hearing you're not passing the bar
[01:27:15.720 --> 01:27:20.720]  Once you move past the bar, you move within the jurisdiction of the court
[01:27:20.720 --> 01:27:26.720]  And you tell the judge, I am outside the bar at arm's length to the court
[01:27:26.720 --> 01:27:32.720]  I have a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction before the court, there's not anything they can do
[01:27:32.720 --> 01:27:36.720]  Until they cover or handle that jurisdiction challenge
[01:27:36.720 --> 01:27:40.720]  Well, the judge is just going to ignore it, we don't care
[01:27:40.720 --> 01:27:47.720]  Never ask him to do anything you actually want him to do because when he ignores it, that's a proactive act on his part
[01:27:47.720 --> 01:27:51.720]  For which he is criminally liable
[01:27:51.720 --> 01:27:55.720]  And as soon as you get done with the court, we'll go to that part
[01:27:55.720 --> 01:28:06.720]  We'll talk about his criminal liability because after the first hearing, then you come back and we'll talk about what he actually did
[01:28:06.720 --> 01:28:14.720]  And make up a whole bunch more stuff to file the next, hopefully the next day
[01:28:14.720 --> 01:28:19.720]  He thinks the first stack was a problem, well he sees the second one
[01:28:19.720 --> 01:28:26.720]  And the whole thing, they'll never get to the merits of the case
[01:28:26.720 --> 01:28:32.720]  They'll never talk about the stop sign issue, can't get there
[01:28:32.720 --> 01:28:36.720]  You've got to get past jurisdiction and do a process before you can ever get there
[01:28:36.720 --> 01:28:40.720]  But the short and long of it is, don't worry about what happens in court
[01:28:40.720 --> 01:28:47.720]  Use it as just practice
[01:28:47.720 --> 01:29:00.720]  Okay, and on the paper they put that quote, you have submitted a plea of not guilty, which I did not do
[01:29:00.720 --> 01:29:05.720]  That's irrelevant
[01:29:05.720 --> 01:29:08.720]  I don't know how they did that
[01:29:08.720 --> 01:29:16.720]  But if you were to submit a plea, you would submit a plea of not guilty
[01:29:16.720 --> 01:29:21.720]  You could argue about that issue, but it won't make any difference
[01:29:21.720 --> 01:29:32.720]  I've argued that issue and get them all irritated, they get another judicial complaint, they have another criminal complaint against them
[01:29:32.720 --> 01:29:35.720]  But yeah, they do just tend to walk all over it
[01:29:35.720 --> 01:29:43.720]  I would say raise it, but don't be worried if they go right on pass it
[01:29:43.720 --> 01:29:46.720]  You don't care what they do, if you want to raise it, absolutely
[01:29:46.720 --> 01:29:51.720]  I'm just trying not to give you so much that it would get overwhelming
[01:29:51.720 --> 01:30:16.720]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, rule our radio, we'll be right back
[01:30:16.720 --> 01:30:21.720]  Privacy is under attack, when you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[01:30:21.720 --> 01:30:26.720]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:30:26.720 --> 01:30:31.720]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[01:30:31.720 --> 01:30:34.720]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:30:34.720 --> 01:30:38.720]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StarkPage.com
[01:30:38.720 --> 01:30:42.720]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[01:30:42.720 --> 01:30:45.720]  Start over with StarkPage
[01:30:45.720 --> 01:30:49.720]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right?
[01:30:49.720 --> 01:30:50.720]  Wrong
[01:30:50.720 --> 01:30:55.720]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade
[01:30:55.720 --> 01:31:02.720]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all
[01:31:02.720 --> 01:31:09.720]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars don't deliver anything to squelch it
[01:31:09.720 --> 01:31:15.720]  Making up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake
[01:31:15.720 --> 01:31:23.720]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead
[01:31:23.720 --> 01:31:29.720]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:31:29.720 --> 01:31:35.720]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11
[01:31:35.720 --> 01:31:37.720]  The government says that fire brought it down
[01:31:37.720 --> 01:31:42.720]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition
[01:31:42.720 --> 01:31:45.720]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[01:31:45.720 --> 01:31:47.720]  And thousands of my fellow force respond to supply
[01:31:47.720 --> 01:31:49.720]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist
[01:31:49.720 --> 01:31:50.720]  I'm a structural engineer
[01:31:50.720 --> 01:31:51.720]  I'm a New York City correction officer
[01:31:51.720 --> 01:31:52.720]  I'm an Air Force pilot
[01:31:52.720 --> 01:31:54.720]  I'm the father who lost his son
[01:31:54.720 --> 01:31:56.720]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth
[01:31:56.720 --> 01:32:00.720]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[01:32:00.720 --> 01:32:04.720]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar
[01:32:04.720 --> 01:32:07.720]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society
[01:32:07.720 --> 01:32:09.720]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society
[01:32:09.720 --> 01:32:12.720]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[01:32:12.720 --> 01:32:15.720]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[01:32:15.720 --> 01:32:17.720]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[01:32:17.720 --> 01:32:19.720]  And most importantly, the right to due process of law
[01:32:19.720 --> 01:32:25.720]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[01:32:25.720 --> 01:32:28.720]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[01:32:28.720 --> 01:32:30.720]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:30.720 --> 01:32:34.720]  That will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law
[01:32:34.720 --> 01:32:38.720]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:38.720 --> 01:32:40.720]  And ordering your copy today
[01:32:40.720 --> 01:32:43.720]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code
[01:32:43.720 --> 01:32:44.720]  The Law vs. the Lie
[01:32:44.720 --> 01:32:47.720]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[01:32:47.720 --> 01:32:50.720]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[01:32:50.720 --> 01:32:53.720]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:53.720 --> 01:33:01.720]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve
[01:33:01.720 --> 01:33:03.720]  Looking for some truth?
[01:33:03.720 --> 01:33:24.720]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:33.720 --> 01:33:47.720]  Okay, we are back
[01:33:47.720 --> 01:33:54.720]  And we're talking to Krista in Texas
[01:33:54.720 --> 01:34:00.720]  Okay, yeah, I didn't, you know, I don't, I don't want to overwhelm you
[01:34:00.720 --> 01:34:08.720]  But if you want to, if you want to question about it, by all means
[01:34:08.720 --> 01:34:13.720]  What I've done is you can do just like with all these others, you're putting in a document
[01:34:13.720 --> 01:34:20.720]  And so you go ahead and type it up when you have, you know, the mental, you're at peace
[01:34:20.720 --> 01:34:24.720]  At your own home, you type it up and you just, it's just an objection
[01:34:24.720 --> 01:34:31.720]  I object to the judge entering a plea on my behalf without my knowledge of permission for him to represent me
[01:34:31.720 --> 01:34:33.720]  And you just put that in there and it's an objection
[01:34:33.720 --> 01:34:38.720]  And you don't really expect for them to go, oh, oh, in that case, so sorry
[01:34:38.720 --> 01:34:44.720]  You don't expect to the appropriate response, but it means that's one more thing that you could raise on a field
[01:34:44.720 --> 01:34:50.720]  Or it's one more thing that you can file a criminal complaint, judicial misconduct complaint
[01:34:50.720 --> 01:34:52.720]  And so forth
[01:34:52.720 --> 01:34:59.720]  Yeah, your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal
[01:34:59.720 --> 01:35:05.720]  And the courts have held that rights belong to the belligerent litigant
[01:35:05.720 --> 01:35:09.720]  If you want them, you must claim them
[01:35:09.720 --> 01:35:13.720]  So anything you don't complain about, they consider you waive it
[01:35:13.720 --> 01:35:17.720]  So by all means, we do this in documentation
[01:35:17.720 --> 01:35:23.720]  But also, if you feel comfortable raising the argument in court, go ahead
[01:35:23.720 --> 01:35:27.720]  It's good practice
[01:35:27.720 --> 01:35:32.720]  Are you there, Christos?
[01:35:32.720 --> 01:35:37.720]  You might check your mute button, I have you unmuted on my side
[01:35:37.720 --> 01:35:51.720]  Okay, you said that it won't go past the jurisdiction and stuff, that they can't get to the actual complaint
[01:35:51.720 --> 01:35:59.720]  So how would that court or pre-trial end?
[01:35:59.720 --> 01:36:06.720]  Well, they can't lawfully get past it, but they probably will go past it
[01:36:06.720 --> 01:36:10.720]  They've got a railroad routine they do
[01:36:10.720 --> 01:36:16.720]  And while they can't lawfully go past it, you're raising the objection
[01:36:16.720 --> 01:36:25.720]  By raising the objection, you get it in the record
[01:36:25.720 --> 01:36:30.720]  It might be a good thing to just mention, for anybody that doesn't realize, the appellate court
[01:36:30.720 --> 01:36:37.720]  When you go to appeal, the appellate court can't look at everything in the whole case
[01:36:37.720 --> 01:36:40.720]  And just start all over and say, oh, well, you know what?
[01:36:40.720 --> 01:36:45.720]  We thought this party was correct, but actually, let's check it, what about this?
[01:36:45.720 --> 01:36:48.720]  They don't do that, they don't investigate the whole case
[01:36:48.720 --> 01:36:55.720]  They are only checking to see about the judicial error
[01:36:55.720 --> 01:37:04.720]  If you objected to something and the judge said overruled, when he should have said sustained
[01:37:04.720 --> 01:37:11.720]  Then that's something that the appellate court would review and reverse
[01:37:11.720 --> 01:37:16.720]  They don't just go back and say, oh, well, it looks like, you know, let me see that video again
[01:37:16.720 --> 01:37:19.720]  Can you back that up? They're not doing that
[01:37:19.720 --> 01:37:22.720]  Does that make sense?
[01:37:22.720 --> 01:37:25.720]  Krista, you're just setting the record
[01:37:25.720 --> 01:37:30.720]  The appellate court is going to rule what they rule on the record
[01:37:30.720 --> 01:37:38.720]  And this is a municipal court, and while this one is a court of record
[01:37:38.720 --> 01:37:43.720]  If you appeal from this court, you appeal to the county court
[01:37:43.720 --> 01:37:48.720]  And they call it an appeal on trial de novo
[01:37:48.720 --> 01:37:57.720]  And what trial de novo means is that you rehear the case
[01:37:57.720 --> 01:38:05.720]  What it does not mean is they are absolved from all the bad stuff they did in the first hearing
[01:38:05.720 --> 01:38:13.720]  For instance, if they screw up and say something that amounts to a judicial admission
[01:38:13.720 --> 01:38:19.720]  When they get to the appellate court, the first appeal will be a county court
[01:38:19.720 --> 01:38:22.720]  They'll say, oh, this is trial de novo, that don't matter
[01:38:22.720 --> 01:38:25.720]  No, that's not what trial de novo is
[01:38:25.720 --> 01:38:38.720]  Trial de novo is simply a retrial you can have where you don't have to claim error to get the trial
[01:38:38.720 --> 01:38:45.720]  It does not absolve them or invalidate what they said or did in the original hearing
[01:38:45.720 --> 01:38:53.720]  So if they screwed up something in the original hearing, you can bring it in the case on trial de novo
[01:38:53.720 --> 01:38:59.720]  That's an argument you probably won't get to, but it's good to know that
[01:38:59.720 --> 01:39:10.720]  We think it doesn't make any difference what we do if they appeal, it's trial de novo, and they tend not to have people knowing that
[01:39:10.720 --> 01:39:17.720]  Even traffic lawyers never fight the case, they just make a deal with the prosecutor
[01:39:17.720 --> 01:39:27.720]  If you pay a lawyer to represent you in a traffic case, he's going to make the same deal with the prosecutor you could have made
[01:39:27.720 --> 01:39:34.720]  Except you don't have to go down the court and go through the problem of doing it, he'll do it for you, and he'll just do it on the phone
[01:39:34.720 --> 01:39:43.720]  So if you want to fight it, then all you have to do is go down, set the record, don't worry about what they do, you don't care what they do
[01:39:43.720 --> 01:39:48.720]  The worse they do, the better
[01:39:48.720 --> 01:39:58.720]  Like me, they arrested me in the district attorney's office for disorderly conduct
[01:39:58.720 --> 01:40:07.720]  I'm having a private conversation with a prosecutor attorney, but the bailiff was afraid that I was going to file criminal charges against him
[01:40:07.720 --> 01:40:11.720]  And he made up a reason to arrest me
[01:40:11.720 --> 01:40:15.720]  That could not have worked better for me
[01:40:15.720 --> 01:40:19.720]  I'm suing him for $11 million
[01:40:19.720 --> 01:40:25.720]  When they screw things up, the worse they screw things up, the better for you
[01:40:25.720 --> 01:40:29.720]  So don't worry about him running against you
[01:40:29.720 --> 01:40:36.720]  Okay, anything else?
[01:40:36.720 --> 01:40:45.720]  So you said when they say you should talk to the prosecutor because this is the precinct or whatever?
[01:40:45.720 --> 01:40:48.720]  All the prosecutor you're going to do is offer you a deal
[01:40:48.720 --> 01:40:55.720]  And the court has no power to order you to come to court to talk to the prosecutor
[01:40:55.720 --> 01:41:00.720]  If you talk to the prosecutor, you waive that issue
[01:41:00.720 --> 01:41:05.720]  So don't talk to her, I don't talk to prosecutors
[01:41:05.720 --> 01:41:06.720]  Okay
[01:41:06.720 --> 01:41:09.720]  This is what Brett does to lawyers, he won't talk to lawyers
[01:41:09.720 --> 01:41:13.720]  Will you explain that, Brett?
[01:41:13.720 --> 01:41:19.720]  Well, in the case of...I'm dealing with a public official and say records request
[01:41:19.720 --> 01:41:25.720]  I'm asking for the public official to do something that they're required to do
[01:41:25.720 --> 01:41:28.720]  Like respond to my records request
[01:41:28.720 --> 01:41:38.720]  And instead of getting a response back, I get this note from an attorney who is trying to inject himself as authoritative in that matter
[01:41:38.720 --> 01:41:42.720]  And try to tell me what I can and can't have and what I should have asked for
[01:41:42.720 --> 01:41:47.720]  And how much it's going to cost me and know this is voluminous
[01:41:47.720 --> 01:41:52.720]  And you know we have two weeks to answer and all of that stuff
[01:41:52.720 --> 01:41:54.720]  I didn't involve him
[01:41:54.720 --> 01:41:57.720]  Who are you? Get out of my face
[01:41:57.720 --> 01:42:02.720]  Okay, you're an attorney, good for you, I'm proud of you, go away
[01:42:02.720 --> 01:42:05.720]  Don't harass me
[01:42:05.720 --> 01:42:08.720]  They don't know what to do with that
[01:42:08.720 --> 01:42:13.720]  And they come back and they try to explain how they have such and such a position and I respond back
[01:42:13.720 --> 01:42:18.720]  I told you, don't contact me, I told you, don't harass me, go away
[01:42:18.720 --> 01:42:23.720]  This is harassment, I didn't want any of your unsolicited legal advice
[01:42:23.720 --> 01:42:26.720]  If it's bad legal advice to boot, go away
[01:42:26.720 --> 01:42:30.720]  Somebody hired you, tell them your bad advice
[01:42:30.720 --> 01:42:40.720]  In a criminal case, the prosecuting, the criminal in any case, the litigants are not to talk to each other
[01:42:40.720 --> 01:42:47.720]  But when you get in the court, never ever talk to the prosecutor, only talk to the judge
[01:42:47.720 --> 01:42:55.720]  Don't listen to anything the prosecutor said, if he says anything to you, you ask the judge to tell him be quiet
[01:42:55.720 --> 01:43:00.720]  That you're not here to have any social interaction with the prosecutor
[01:43:00.720 --> 01:43:05.720]  You're here to talk to the court and nothing else
[01:43:05.720 --> 01:43:13.720]  So what the court has done is tried to order you to come to court and order you to speak with that lawyer
[01:43:13.720 --> 01:43:16.720]  No, no, we're in court, we don't talk to each other, we're forbidden to
[01:43:16.720 --> 01:43:19.720]  So what is this crapola?
[01:43:19.720 --> 01:43:24.720]  They don't get that done to them very often and they won't know how to handle it
[01:43:24.720 --> 01:43:31.720]  And if you refuse to talk to the prosecutor, then you have preserved that error
[01:43:31.720 --> 01:43:34.720]  That's an abusive process
[01:43:34.720 --> 01:43:36.720]  And that's, what is that?
[01:43:36.720 --> 01:43:39.720]  We're at thirty-two...
[01:43:39.720 --> 01:43:40.720]  Thirty-nine on the truth?
[01:43:40.720 --> 01:43:42.720]  Thirty-nine on the truth
[01:43:42.720 --> 01:43:43.720]  Abusive office?
[01:43:43.720 --> 01:43:47.720]  No, thirty-nine on the truth is a fisherman's conduct
[01:43:47.720 --> 01:43:50.720]  This one's in thirty-eight
[01:43:50.720 --> 01:43:55.720]  It's an abusive process, it's in there somewhere, I forget the number, I think it's thirty-two forty-eight
[01:43:55.720 --> 01:43:58.720]  Or simulating legal process, thirty-two forty-eight
[01:43:58.720 --> 01:43:59.720]  Yeah
[01:43:59.720 --> 01:44:05.720]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition
[01:44:05.720 --> 01:44:08.720]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves
[01:44:08.720 --> 01:44:10.720]  And it's time we changed all that
[01:44:10.720 --> 01:44:16.720]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[01:44:16.720 --> 01:44:21.720]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated and mutilated
[01:44:21.720 --> 01:44:24.720]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need
[01:44:24.720 --> 01:44:30.720]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject
[01:44:30.720 --> 01:44:33.720]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much
[01:44:33.720 --> 01:44:39.720]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others
[01:44:39.720 --> 01:44:42.720]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:44:42.720 --> 01:44:47.720]  Your health will improve as you help support quality radio
[01:44:47.720 --> 01:44:51.720]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us
[01:44:51.720 --> 01:44:56.720]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family
[01:44:56.720 --> 01:45:00.720]  And increase your income, order now
[01:45:00.720 --> 01:45:03.720]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.720 --> 01:45:07.720]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[01:45:07.720 --> 01:45:14.720]  It's an affordable, easy to understand 4CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[01:45:14.720 --> 01:45:18.720]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[01:45:18.720 --> 01:45:22.720]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[01:45:22.720 --> 01:45:27.720]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too
[01:45:27.720 --> 01:45:33.720]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[01:45:33.720 --> 01:45:38.720]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.720 --> 01:45:42.720]  About the principles and practices that control our American courts
[01:45:42.720 --> 01:45:51.720]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics and much more
[01:45:51.720 --> 01:45:55.720]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:55.720 --> 01:46:04.720]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ
[01:46:25.720 --> 01:46:36.720]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelcey, Brett Felton, rule of law review
[01:46:36.720 --> 01:46:43.720]  And Kristen, we probably fed you as much as you could assimilate at this time
[01:46:43.720 --> 01:46:47.720]  But the whole thing is, don't worry about it, it doesn't matter what you do
[01:46:47.720 --> 01:46:52.720]  This is just a good opportunity to get in front of the court
[01:46:52.720 --> 01:46:58.720]  And you don't have to worry about what's going on because you've got all these documents already filed
[01:46:58.720 --> 01:47:04.720]  This will not just teach you how to handle a traffic ticket
[01:47:04.720 --> 01:47:15.720]  Once you have worked through this traffic ticket issue, you will be as good in court as most lawyers
[01:47:15.720 --> 01:47:18.720]  It's not that difficult
[01:47:18.720 --> 01:47:24.720]  And once you've been before in a time or two, it'll get much, much easier
[01:47:24.720 --> 01:47:27.720]  Right now you have no frame of reference
[01:47:27.720 --> 01:47:32.720]  Once you've been before the court, you'll begin to develop a frame of reference
[01:47:32.720 --> 01:47:36.720]  Then you'll start asking us really good questions
[01:47:36.720 --> 01:47:39.720]  Okay, one quick question
[01:47:39.720 --> 01:47:46.720]  Can this leave them saying that I owe thousands of dollars instead?
[01:47:46.720 --> 01:47:51.720]  No, there's a set amount they can charge you, they can't get over that
[01:47:51.720 --> 01:47:55.720]  Okay, so they can't have court fees or lower your fees?
[01:47:55.720 --> 01:48:06.720]  Whatever court fees or standard, what they would charge you anyway, it doesn't increase above that
[01:48:06.720 --> 01:48:11.720]  This is criminal, it's not civil, they can't charge your attorney fees or all that other stuff
[01:48:11.720 --> 01:48:15.720]  It is statutory for what they can charge
[01:48:15.720 --> 01:48:18.720]  Okay, so the amount they gave me is it?
[01:48:18.720 --> 01:48:21.720]  Wait, said that again?
[01:48:21.720 --> 01:48:28.720]  So the amount they wrote on the paperwork is the only thing they can charge?
[01:48:28.720 --> 01:48:29.720]  That's it
[01:48:29.720 --> 01:48:31.720]  Or, okay
[01:48:31.720 --> 01:48:33.720]  So that's what's good about this
[01:48:33.720 --> 01:48:36.720]  The only thing you can do is win, you can't lose
[01:48:36.720 --> 01:48:38.720]  If you don't fight it, this is what you have to pay
[01:48:38.720 --> 01:48:44.720]  They'll make you a deal and charge you a little bit less, but it's a jump change
[01:48:44.720 --> 01:48:48.720]  Relative to the education you get
[01:48:48.720 --> 01:48:53.720]  The next time the lights come on behind you, you won't be the least bit frightened
[01:48:53.720 --> 01:48:56.720]  You won't get those butterflies in your stomach
[01:48:56.720 --> 01:49:03.720]  Those lights come on me and I look up and I think, Bubba, I'm fixing to give you a romp through the legal system
[01:49:03.720 --> 01:49:06.720]  You are not going to believe
[01:49:06.720 --> 01:49:09.720]  I like that feeling
[01:49:09.720 --> 01:49:15.720]  Okay, and do you have anything to say to them actually swearing out a complaint against me?
[01:49:15.720 --> 01:49:19.720]  No
[01:49:19.720 --> 01:49:25.720]  Everything, they can swear out a complaint, anybody can do that
[01:49:25.720 --> 01:49:28.720]  Be careful what you ask for
[01:49:28.720 --> 01:49:32.720]  You can swear out a complaint against them
[01:49:32.720 --> 01:49:36.720]  Some of these kids doing?
[01:49:36.720 --> 01:49:38.720]  No, go ahead, Brett
[01:49:38.720 --> 01:49:45.720]  What I like to do is ask the court clerk to show me the file
[01:49:45.720 --> 01:49:51.720]  I want to see the file and they'll say, oh, if there's nothing in there yet, you can come back in about three days
[01:49:51.720 --> 01:49:54.720]  I just want it right now, but it's in the file
[01:49:54.720 --> 01:50:02.720]  But the only thing we've got in there right now, well, it's just a little note or whatever they have
[01:50:02.720 --> 01:50:07.720]  They might have the citation, whatever they have, even if it's nothing, sometimes it's completely nothing
[01:50:07.720 --> 01:50:11.720]  And you just get them to say what is in there
[01:50:11.720 --> 01:50:15.720]  And then if it's nothing, you get them to certify that response to you
[01:50:15.720 --> 01:50:25.720]  Now you have a piece of paper in your hand with the court clerk's signature on it that says, as of such and such a day, at such and such a time, there was nothing in the record
[01:50:25.720 --> 01:50:34.720]  You can look on jurismprudence.com, I'm sorry, jurismprudence.website
[01:50:34.720 --> 01:50:42.720]  And pop icon on the top frog on the right, documents and research
[01:50:42.720 --> 01:50:46.720]  In there you will find a blank info request
[01:50:46.720 --> 01:50:56.720]  Just download that, fill it out, and write in the section provided for that what you want to see and give that to them
[01:50:56.720 --> 01:51:00.720]  I'd like to use mine because mine are really obnoxious
[01:51:00.720 --> 01:51:06.720]  But you tell the clerk and he says, well, we don't have anything, he says, okay, then just take this document and write
[01:51:06.720 --> 01:51:17.720]  Me an answer saying we have no record responsive to your request so that I can memorialize the fact of what is in the record on this day
[01:51:17.720 --> 01:51:20.720]  And now stand there looking at you confused
[01:51:20.720 --> 01:51:26.720]  And generally I get it, but when you give them that information request
[01:51:26.720 --> 01:51:30.720]  That invokes illegal duty on their part
[01:51:30.720 --> 01:51:34.720]  So you don't care what they do
[01:51:34.720 --> 01:51:40.720]  You invoke the duty if they don't act in accordance with their duty then you get to file against them
[01:51:40.720 --> 01:51:44.720]  But generally the clerks are not somebody we have a fight with
[01:51:44.720 --> 01:51:55.720]  And if the clerk doesn't have anything, she shouldn't have a problem giving you an answer saying we have no record responsive to your request and you got it
[01:51:55.720 --> 01:51:58.720]  I do that all the time
[01:51:58.720 --> 01:52:02.720]  That's the reason I call 911
[01:52:02.720 --> 01:52:10.720]  In your case, where the officer made threats against you, that would have got a 911 call
[01:52:10.720 --> 01:52:17.720]  Yeah, he'll get more cops out here, but he'll be because you called him, not because he called him
[01:52:17.720 --> 01:52:19.720]  Come be Texas
[01:52:19.720 --> 01:52:22.720]  One of my regrets is that I didn't just dial it right then
[01:52:22.720 --> 01:52:26.720]  Yeah, he is so much fun. When do you do that the first time?
[01:52:26.720 --> 01:52:30.720]  Oh, he's great. That cop pulled me over Newark
[01:52:30.720 --> 01:52:34.720]  He said, Mr. Kelton, you know why I stopped you? I said, no, but I figure you're going to tell me
[01:52:34.720 --> 01:52:37.720]  Well, your registration has expired
[01:52:37.720 --> 01:52:40.720]  I said, only two years, what's the problem?
[01:52:40.720 --> 01:52:46.720]  He went back to write the ticket, I called 911, I want him arrested for first degree felony aggravated assault
[01:52:46.720 --> 01:52:53.720]  And I could take him there by the code
[01:52:53.720 --> 01:53:00.720]  When he came back with the ticket, he was so furious his hands were vibrating
[01:53:00.720 --> 01:53:06.720]  Sorry, Bubba, no sense of humor
[01:53:06.720 --> 01:53:09.720]  You do it to us, we do it to you
[01:53:09.720 --> 01:53:16.720]  When you call 911 on the police, you'll get to see what we call this little chicken dance
[01:53:16.720 --> 01:53:23.720]  That's where the responding 911 officer says, oh, well, you know, you tell him, arrest that person
[01:53:23.720 --> 01:53:25.720]  That's his buddy over there
[01:53:25.720 --> 01:53:32.720]  Well, Ms. Krista, and while he's saying that, he'll be shifting from one foot to the other
[01:53:32.720 --> 01:53:34.720]  And we call that the little chicken dance
[01:53:34.720 --> 01:53:37.720]  I did that in Come Be Texas
[01:53:37.720 --> 01:53:45.720]  While I was waiting for a prosecutor to show up, before I would even talk to him, I wanted a bailiff in there
[01:53:45.720 --> 01:53:48.720]  So they called a policeman to come in there for security
[01:53:48.720 --> 01:53:53.720]  And I said, you just watch, I'm going to ask the bailiff to arrest the prosecutor
[01:53:53.720 --> 01:53:57.720]  And you're going to get to see this little chicken dance and I explained it to her
[01:53:57.720 --> 01:54:02.720]  It turned out that I asked the bailiff to arrest the prosecutor and the mayor
[01:54:02.720 --> 01:54:07.720]  And the cop starts shifting from one foot to the other
[01:54:07.720 --> 01:54:10.720]  And I turned to the mayor and grinned and pointed at him
[01:54:10.720 --> 01:54:14.720]  She did not see the humor in that
[01:54:14.720 --> 01:54:22.720]  But when the 911 officer shows up, you're the victim
[01:54:22.720 --> 01:54:26.720]  You have just changed everything
[01:54:26.720 --> 01:54:29.720]  He's there because you called him
[01:54:29.720 --> 01:54:32.720]  He is on the dime
[01:54:32.720 --> 01:54:35.720]  These guys doing first amendment audits
[01:54:35.720 --> 01:54:40.720]  Trying to get them, the first time the cop gives you any guff at all
[01:54:40.720 --> 01:54:42.720]  Call 911
[01:54:42.720 --> 01:54:45.720]  Get somebody out here to get this guy under control
[01:54:45.720 --> 01:54:49.720]  It changes everything
[01:54:49.720 --> 01:54:51.720]  Then all the problems stop
[01:54:51.720 --> 01:54:55.720]  No Huffin and Puffin, no Sovereign Citizen
[01:54:55.720 --> 01:54:59.720]  They get their act straight real quick
[01:54:59.720 --> 01:55:02.720]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it
[01:55:02.720 --> 01:55:05.720]  Okay, do you have anything else for us, Krista?
[01:55:05.720 --> 01:55:08.720]  That is good, I suppose
[01:55:08.720 --> 01:55:10.720]  Thank you
[01:55:10.720 --> 01:55:12.720]  Just have fun
[01:55:12.720 --> 01:55:14.720]  It can't get any worse than it already is
[01:55:14.720 --> 01:55:16.720]  All it can do is get better
[01:55:16.720 --> 01:55:19.720]  And they'll give you free education
[01:55:19.720 --> 01:55:22.720]  Okay, thank you Krista
[01:55:22.720 --> 01:55:25.720]  We had a first time caller
[01:55:25.720 --> 01:55:29.720]  In an 8-3-0 area code
[01:55:29.720 --> 01:55:31.720]  If you're listening, call back
[01:55:31.720 --> 01:55:33.720]  We always take their first time callers first
[01:55:33.720 --> 01:55:35.720]  0-3
[01:55:35.720 --> 01:55:38.720]  I'm sorry, 0-3
[01:55:38.720 --> 01:55:42.720]  If you're from 8-0-3 and you called us earlier and dropped off
[01:55:42.720 --> 01:55:44.720]  Call us back, we'll take you right away
[01:55:44.720 --> 01:55:47.720]  Now we're going to Bob in California
[01:55:47.720 --> 01:55:52.720]  Okay Bob, you went to a...
[01:55:52.720 --> 01:55:54.720]  You had a Zoom meeting
[01:55:54.720 --> 01:55:57.720]  Before hearing with the Court of Appeals
[01:55:57.720 --> 01:55:59.720]  Yes
[01:55:59.720 --> 01:56:02.720]  Tell us all about that
[01:56:02.720 --> 01:56:06.720]  Well, there was a panel of three judges
[01:56:06.720 --> 01:56:09.720]  And they were very pleasant
[01:56:09.720 --> 01:56:12.720]  They informed me that I didn't have to say anything
[01:56:12.720 --> 01:56:15.720]  That they had read my opening brief
[01:56:15.720 --> 01:56:17.720]  About the ruling
[01:56:17.720 --> 01:56:25.720]  And when I asked if the ruling would come with conclusions
[01:56:25.720 --> 01:56:29.720]  In law, the judge...
[01:56:29.720 --> 01:56:34.720]  Like I said, the judge says, I'm not going to be interviewed here
[01:56:34.720 --> 01:56:40.720]  So for Kristen, as far as calling 9-1-1
[01:56:40.720 --> 01:56:43.720]  At one time in all this
[01:56:43.720 --> 01:56:45.720]  20 policemen around me
[01:56:45.720 --> 01:56:50.720]  And when I called 9-1-1 on the sergeant
[01:56:50.720 --> 01:56:54.720]  They scattered like ants
[01:56:54.720 --> 01:56:58.720]  That's great
[01:56:58.720 --> 01:57:02.720]  I filed criminal complaint against a responding officer
[01:57:02.720 --> 01:57:08.720]  For shielding us from prosecution
[01:57:08.720 --> 01:57:12.720]  Which the sheriff didn't like too well
[01:57:12.720 --> 01:57:17.720]  But it seems to put them in their place
[01:57:17.720 --> 01:57:22.720]  When I see the officer now
[01:57:22.720 --> 01:57:24.720]  I saw him a while back
[01:57:24.720 --> 01:57:27.720]  And I said, hello, how are you doing?
[01:57:27.720 --> 01:57:29.720]  I was coming up there to see you
[01:57:29.720 --> 01:57:31.720]  He said, no, no, no, stay down there
[01:57:31.720 --> 01:57:36.720]  See that enough
[01:57:36.720 --> 01:57:41.720]  Anyway, thank you for the advice
[01:57:41.720 --> 01:57:44.720]  There's something to do about what happened there
[01:57:44.720 --> 01:57:49.720]  And thank you for letting me listen to Kristen
[01:57:49.720 --> 01:57:53.720]  I can only encourage her to go forward
[01:57:53.720 --> 01:57:59.720]  Because I would say that they'll dismiss her charges
[01:57:59.720 --> 01:58:01.720]  In the interest of justice
[01:58:01.720 --> 01:58:03.720]  Just to get rid of her
[01:58:03.720 --> 01:58:06.720]  We hope so
[01:58:06.720 --> 01:58:08.720]  Okay, thank you
[01:58:08.720 --> 01:58:10.720]  Thank you, Joe
[01:58:10.720 --> 01:58:11.720]  Thank you, Bob
[01:58:11.720 --> 01:58:13.720]  I'm looking at Joe Butler next
[01:58:13.720 --> 01:58:15.720]  Joe, we'll get you back on the other side
[01:58:15.720 --> 01:58:16.720]  When we've got 30 seconds
[01:58:16.720 --> 01:58:20.720]  So I won't try to bring you on this side
[01:58:20.720 --> 01:58:25.720]  We do have two slots open on the collar board
[01:58:25.720 --> 01:58:29.720]  Now we only got one slot open
[01:58:29.720 --> 01:58:31.720]  So if you have a question or comment
[01:58:31.720 --> 01:58:32.720]  Give us a call
[01:58:32.720 --> 01:58:33.720]  We'll be taking your calls all night
[01:58:33.720 --> 01:58:34.720]  We've still got a couple hours
[01:58:34.720 --> 01:58:37.720]  So we should have plenty of time
[01:58:37.720 --> 01:58:39.720]  Unless we bring John on
[01:58:39.720 --> 01:58:42.720]  As he can talk all night
[01:58:42.720 --> 01:58:44.720]  Isn't that right, John?
[01:58:44.720 --> 01:58:46.720]  Never mind, we're going to break
[01:58:46.720 --> 01:58:49.720]  We'll be right back
[01:58:49.720 --> 01:58:53.720]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world
[01:58:53.720 --> 01:58:55.720]  Yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.720 --> 01:58:57.720]  Because they struggle to understand it
[01:58:57.720 --> 01:58:59.720]  Some new translations try to help
[01:58:59.720 --> 01:59:01.720]  By simplifying the text
[01:59:01.720 --> 01:59:03.720]  But in the process can compromise
[01:59:03.720 --> 01:59:06.720]  The profound meaning of the Scripture
[01:59:06.720 --> 01:59:08.720]  Enter the recovery version
[01:59:08.720 --> 01:59:10.720]  First, this new translation
[01:59:10.720 --> 01:59:12.720]  Is extremely faithful and accurate
[01:59:12.720 --> 01:59:14.720]  But the real story is the more than
[01:59:14.720 --> 01:59:17.720]  9,000 explanatory footnotes
[01:59:17.720 --> 01:59:19.720]  Difficult and profound passages
[01:59:19.720 --> 01:59:21.720]  Are opened up in a marvelous way
[01:59:21.720 --> 01:59:24.720]  Providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[01:59:24.720 --> 01:59:27.720]  Beyond which you've ever experienced before
[01:59:27.720 --> 01:59:29.720]  Bibles for America would like to give you
[01:59:29.720 --> 01:59:32.720]  A free recovery version simply for the asking
[01:59:32.720 --> 01:59:35.720]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible
[01:59:35.720 --> 01:59:38.720]  Is yours just by calling us toll free
[01:59:38.720 --> 01:59:43.720]  At 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.720 --> 01:59:45.720]  Or by ordering online at
[01:59:45.720 --> 01:59:47.720]  FreeStudyBible.com
[01:59:47.720 --> 01:59:50.720]  That's FreeStudyBible.com
[01:59:50.720 --> 01:59:53.720]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[01:59:53.720 --> 02:00:06.720]  LogosRadioNetwork.com