ROL_2021-03-19_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.440]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429.00, Silver
[00:13.440 --> 00:24.200]  $16.45.00, Copper $2.75.00, Oil, Texas Crew $55.63.00, Brent Crew $62.47.00, and Cryptos
[00:24.200 --> 00:35.160]  and Order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin
[00:35.160 --> 00:42.560]  $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 of Crypto Coin.
[00:42.560 --> 00:52.480]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.480 --> 00:57.800]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing
[00:57.800 --> 01:04.800]  10 and injuring 40.
[01:04.800 --> 01:09.840]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hempon attacks
[01:09.840 --> 01:14.400]  his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin and San
[01:14.400 --> 01:18.880]  Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones
[01:18.880 --> 01:22.840]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:22.840 --> 01:24.720]  test the herb for THC.
[01:24.720 --> 01:28.440]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this month that
[01:28.440 --> 01:33.000]  she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.000 --> 01:34.000]  law.
[01:34.000 --> 01:37.640]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:37.640 --> 01:42.120]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.120 --> 01:48.320]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.320 --> 01:54.480]  well as other cities too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.480 --> 01:59.000]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:59.000 --> 02:01.760]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.760 --> 02:06.760]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.760 --> 02:10.800]  in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.800 --> 02:13.520]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.520 --> 02:17.400]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches with their
[02:17.400 --> 02:22.640]  charge to it.
[02:22.640 --> 02:27.240]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark
[02:27.240 --> 02:32.400]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.400 --> 02:38.040]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.040 --> 02:39.520]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.520 --> 02:44.200]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its
[02:44.200 --> 02:51.200]  front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[03:14.200 --> 03:43.200]  Okay, we are back, Randy Carlson, Brett Fountain with LaRidio, and we have what looks like
[03:43.200 --> 03:45.200]  a first-time caller.
[03:45.200 --> 03:50.680]  We have someone in, my database doesn't show who the caller is.
[03:50.680 --> 03:54.160]  That's how I know it should be a first time.
[03:54.160 --> 03:59.080]  If your area code is 716, you're in California.
[03:59.080 --> 04:01.600]  Talk to us.
[04:01.600 --> 04:08.440]  Hello, hello.
[04:08.440 --> 04:14.240]  Everybody in area code 716 in California.
[04:14.240 --> 04:16.040]  Brett is 716 in California.
[04:16.040 --> 04:17.040]  My system says California.
[04:17.040 --> 04:18.040]  It may not be.
[04:18.040 --> 04:19.040]  I don't know.
[04:19.040 --> 04:20.040]  716.
[04:20.040 --> 04:21.040]  Hello, hello.
[04:21.040 --> 04:22.040]  716.
[04:22.040 --> 04:23.040]  Okay.
[04:23.040 --> 04:26.040]  Must have lost him.
[04:26.040 --> 04:27.040]  Okay.
[04:27.040 --> 04:33.440]  We are going to Tina in California.
[04:33.440 --> 04:41.440]  Hello, Tina, well, that is not good.
[04:41.440 --> 04:46.840]  Hope everything's going all right with the caller board.
[04:46.840 --> 04:50.240]  Okay, let's try John in New York.
[04:50.240 --> 04:51.960]  Hello, John in New York.
[04:51.960 --> 04:53.760]  Hi, John in New York.
[04:53.760 --> 04:54.760]  How are you?
[04:54.760 --> 04:57.240]  Oh, it looks like the caller board's working.
[04:57.240 --> 04:59.240]  I am good.
[04:59.240 --> 05:01.440]  What do you have for us today?
[05:01.440 --> 05:08.760]  Well, this is about two refused FOIL requests.
[05:08.760 --> 05:09.760]  And I'll explain.
[05:09.760 --> 05:11.680]  It'll take exactly 60 seconds.
[05:11.680 --> 05:17.600]  There's one tenant, a guy who left going $5,000 to $8,000, and that tenant was later
[05:17.600 --> 05:20.360]  arrested for aggravated DWI.
[05:20.360 --> 05:25.800]  So the landlord filed a FOIL request for his arrest record so he could get the former
[05:25.800 --> 05:33.960]  tenant's new address and maybe proceed with a lawsuit, try to recover some rent.
[05:33.960 --> 05:40.560]  Then another former tenant, a girl who left an owed $5,000 to $8,000 in back rent.
[05:40.560 --> 05:42.200]  Thank you, Governor Cuomo.
[05:42.200 --> 05:49.960]  Her ex-boyfriend shows up with the girl's tenant's boss, with the girl's tenant's boss,
[05:49.960 --> 05:50.960]  and there was a big fight.
[05:50.960 --> 05:55.040]  There were three or four people in the driveway that were throwing things, putting holes in
[05:55.040 --> 06:01.880]  the outside of the wall of the building, damaging the boss's windshield, big fight on video.
[06:01.880 --> 06:05.800]  So in the meantime, the ex-boyfriend gets arrested too.
[06:05.800 --> 06:11.040]  So the landlord files a FOIL request for the ex-boyfriend's arrest information.
[06:11.040 --> 06:16.120]  The chief of police refused both FOIL requests.
[06:16.120 --> 06:21.960]  One reason that he gave was it was part of an investigation, and the second refusal reason
[06:21.960 --> 06:26.560]  was it would breach private information.
[06:26.560 --> 06:29.240]  Your comment.
[06:29.240 --> 06:32.560]  Your address is not private information.
[06:32.560 --> 06:36.840]  Your social security number is, but that's about it.
[06:36.840 --> 06:38.840]  Arrest records are public.
[06:38.840 --> 06:41.680]  Say it again, though.
[06:41.680 --> 06:43.680]  Say it again.
[06:43.680 --> 06:44.680]  Okay.
[06:44.680 --> 06:47.000]  Go ahead, Brett.
[06:47.000 --> 06:48.720]  You wanted your address, please.
[06:48.720 --> 06:56.280]  He was saying, John, he said that arrest records are completely public.
[06:56.280 --> 06:58.160]  That's what he was saying.
[06:58.160 --> 07:05.920]  And I was going to say that the confidentiality, if there's something on there in some kind
[07:05.920 --> 07:10.880]  of record, you've requested a record, it should be open to the public, but for whatever reason,
[07:10.880 --> 07:14.280]  they have mingled public and private.
[07:14.280 --> 07:18.280]  They have a responsibility to keep public and private separate.
[07:18.280 --> 07:25.040]  And if for some reason they can't, then they have a responsibility to redact that one little
[07:25.040 --> 07:26.040]  piece.
[07:26.040 --> 07:33.560]  They need to give you the record with some redaction to block out that private information.
[07:33.560 --> 07:40.880]  And when you get the record that has the redaction on it, you as the requester can challenge
[07:40.880 --> 07:41.880]  the redaction.
[07:41.880 --> 07:43.800]  You can say, wait a minute.
[07:43.800 --> 07:47.760]  I think that this is not private information under that black box right there.
[07:47.760 --> 07:49.080]  I want to see it.
[07:49.080 --> 07:50.760]  And you can challenge that.
[07:50.760 --> 07:52.960]  In Texas, we do that at the Attorney General.
[07:52.960 --> 07:59.200]  I'm not sure exactly if that's the same way in New York, but you have an opportunity to
[07:59.200 --> 08:01.760]  challenge their redaction.
[08:01.760 --> 08:05.600]  They do not get to just keep the record and say no to the whole thing.
[08:05.600 --> 08:06.600]  No.
[08:06.600 --> 08:07.600]  Absolutely cannot do that.
[08:07.600 --> 08:09.100]  That's your record.
[08:09.100 --> 08:11.760]  It's open to the public.
[08:11.760 --> 08:12.760]  Okay.
[08:12.760 --> 08:20.200]  John, your guy should be happy because the chief of police opened himself up to get beat
[08:20.200 --> 08:21.200]  up himself.
[08:21.200 --> 08:29.640]  And if he's trying to protect these people for some reason, you start beating him up.
[08:29.640 --> 08:33.320]  He's going to get upset with these people.
[08:33.320 --> 08:39.160]  First thing you should do is file a criminal against him.
[08:39.160 --> 08:42.960]  Grant, I just had a thought on that.
[08:42.960 --> 08:50.920]  Could you construe that as tampering with a government document?
[08:50.920 --> 08:56.480]  Secreting a government document from the person or office, it is...
[08:56.480 --> 08:57.480]  No.
[08:57.480 --> 09:06.080]  One of the things that they say in Texas, anyway, is impair availability.
[09:06.080 --> 09:10.320]  So that definitely fits.
[09:10.320 --> 09:15.000]  Let me see if New York says something like that.
[09:15.000 --> 09:23.080]  So anyway, first thing you do is have him file a professional conduct complaint against
[09:23.080 --> 09:30.680]  the chief of police for both times that he denied the information requests.
[09:30.680 --> 09:37.640]  And file those with the mayor and his capacity as a magistrate.
[09:37.640 --> 09:42.520]  So you can get the mayor to refuse to act in his capacity as a magistrate.
[09:42.520 --> 09:46.440]  Then you get to file against the mayor.
[09:46.440 --> 09:49.720]  Chief of police works for the mayor.
[09:49.720 --> 09:55.480]  And when you start hammering the mayor because of the chief of police, there's a good chance
[09:55.480 --> 10:02.480]  that the mayor is not going to be a happy camper.
[10:02.480 --> 10:07.160]  What type of document do you file, a verified complaint?
[10:07.160 --> 10:09.920]  Absolutely.
[10:09.920 --> 10:13.880]  Verified criminal affidavit.
[10:13.880 --> 10:15.120]  Verified criminal affidavit.
[10:15.120 --> 10:18.560]  You swear it before a notary, is that the idea?
[10:18.560 --> 10:19.560]  Absolutely.
[10:19.560 --> 10:26.400]  At this time, you file anything with the court that has a statement of fact in it.
[10:26.400 --> 10:31.160]  It must be notarized.
[10:31.160 --> 10:35.480]  You put a criminal complaint in front of the judge, in front of the mayor, and his capacity
[10:35.480 --> 10:41.600]  as a magistrate, he's most likely going to have no clue as to what to do with it.
[10:41.600 --> 10:47.160]  And what he will tell you is you need to take this to the sheriff or something.
[10:47.160 --> 10:51.400]  And when he does that, then you go to the sheriff with a criminal complaint against
[10:51.400 --> 10:54.000]  the mayor.
[10:54.000 --> 10:57.600]  And then the mayor is really going to be unhappy.
[10:57.600 --> 11:00.320]  At the end of the day, it's all about politics.
[11:00.320 --> 11:04.680]  Do we have to mention the statute?
[11:04.680 --> 11:05.680]  Say that again?
[11:05.680 --> 11:09.880]  In the affidavit, in the affidavit, the criminal complaint, in the affidavit, do we have to
[11:09.880 --> 11:12.360]  mention the statute that he broke?
[11:12.360 --> 11:19.800]  You don't have to, but it's always a really good idea to do that.
[11:19.800 --> 11:28.000]  Make your statement in terms of the elements of the crime you're alleging.
[11:28.000 --> 11:34.680]  When I filed against an officer for official misconduct, I claimed that the officer failed
[11:34.680 --> 11:39.760]  to perform a duty he was required to perform, and then I stipulated the duty he was required
[11:39.760 --> 11:41.760]  to perform.
[11:41.760 --> 11:49.360]  Before the officer exerted or purported to exert an authority, he did not have as follows.
[11:49.360 --> 11:54.280]  And I explained how he exerted an authority he didn't have.
[11:54.280 --> 12:01.880]  And in the process, denied either me or someone else in the full and free access to or enjoyment
[12:01.880 --> 12:06.720]  of this particular right.
[12:06.720 --> 12:12.400]  Then you have stated the claim in terms of all of the elements.
[12:12.400 --> 12:22.880]  So John, you'll want to take a look at, in the New York Penal Law, Article 195 is official
[12:22.880 --> 12:23.880]  misconduct.
[12:23.880 --> 12:30.400]  That's a Class 8 misdemeanor, that's the one he's talking about in Texas, it's 39.03,
[12:30.400 --> 12:35.120]  in New York it's 195.00.
[12:35.120 --> 12:42.360]  And there's also one here that seems to fit 195.05 obstructing governmental administration
[12:42.360 --> 12:44.040]  in the second degree.
[12:44.040 --> 12:51.280]  And that is speaking to the impairment of administrative governmental functions, such
[12:51.280 --> 12:57.400]  as giving you records, and it seems to also fit, that's a Class 8 misdemeanor.
[12:57.400 --> 13:06.200]  So read through both of those, 195.00 and 195.05.
[13:06.200 --> 13:13.680]  Okay, who do you file, what was the original thing you said about filing with the police
[13:13.680 --> 13:18.800]  officer, for the, against the police officer, official misconduct?
[13:18.800 --> 13:20.800]  The mayor.
[13:20.800 --> 13:22.800]  Who do you file?
[13:22.800 --> 13:23.800]  Huh?
[13:23.800 --> 13:24.800]  The mayor.
[13:24.800 --> 13:32.160]  No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, when you start off, you file a chief, a professional
[13:32.160 --> 13:34.400]  conduct complaint.
[13:34.400 --> 13:40.360]  I believe in New York it's called POST, police officer certification training.
[13:40.360 --> 13:46.320]  Look up whoever certifies and licenses peace officers in the state of Texas, in the state
[13:46.320 --> 13:47.800]  of New York.
[13:47.800 --> 13:52.920]  Okay, now that came through garbled, say that one more time for, thank you.
[13:52.920 --> 14:00.120]  You look up the organization that licenses peace officers in New York.
[14:00.120 --> 14:11.560]  It will most likely be some academy, or most of the time it's termed police officer certification
[14:11.560 --> 14:13.560]  and training post.
[14:13.560 --> 14:15.560]  POST post.
[14:15.560 --> 14:24.160]  Yeah, and then whoever the director is, if they don't have a complaint process on their
[14:24.160 --> 14:29.800]  website, just send the complaint to the director of the agency.
[14:29.800 --> 14:32.000]  The director's agency.
[14:32.000 --> 14:34.800]  The director of the agency.
[14:34.800 --> 14:38.360]  Oh, I see, okay.
[14:38.360 --> 14:46.720]  All right, is that pretty much it, that tells me the whole summarization of what to do?
[14:46.720 --> 14:50.400]  Yeah, that'll get them wound up, that'll get things started.
[14:50.400 --> 14:52.440]  Just follow the routine on them.
[14:52.440 --> 14:59.480]  When any public official fails to perform his duty, file on him, add him to the group,
[14:59.480 --> 15:04.840]  and all of them will be upset at this chief of police for getting them in trouble.
[15:04.840 --> 15:11.720]  Okay, dope.
[15:11.720 --> 15:17.560]  Would you like to hear a quick summary on how it gets worse with the COVID shot?
[15:17.560 --> 15:22.520]  I was going to ask.
[15:22.520 --> 15:23.520]  Here we go.
[15:23.520 --> 15:24.520]  Hold on.
[15:24.520 --> 15:28.880]  It is a real mess.
[15:28.880 --> 15:36.880]  I have never seen anything like this in my life.
[15:36.880 --> 15:39.960]  There are many reasons why they are doing this.
[15:39.960 --> 15:44.520]  Whenever you have the shadow government, the Illuminati, the elite, whatever you want to
[15:44.520 --> 15:52.200]  call them, whenever they do things like this, there's always a combination of reasons why
[15:52.200 --> 15:55.080]  they do things.
[15:55.080 --> 15:56.960]  So here we go.
[15:56.960 --> 16:03.720]  The COVID vaccine is wrapped in a layer of propylene glycol.
[16:03.720 --> 16:09.480]  You being an engineer and Brett being a guy, probably knows about engines, propylene glycol
[16:09.480 --> 16:10.480]  is basically antifreeze.
[16:10.480 --> 16:11.480]  No, it's not.
[16:11.480 --> 16:16.320]  You're widely in the food industry, so people, if you're opposed to what you want.
[16:16.320 --> 16:17.320]  Wait, wait, wait.
[16:17.320 --> 16:18.320]  Hold on.
[16:18.320 --> 16:27.280]  Propylene glycol is antifreeze, propylene glycol is used as a coupling agent.
[16:27.280 --> 16:36.880]  So if this is wrapped in propylene glycol, that's intended to cause whatever solution
[16:36.880 --> 16:44.240]  it's in to combine with other solutions, most likely solutions to blood and other solutions
[16:44.240 --> 16:45.240]  in the body.
[16:45.240 --> 16:46.240]  Hang on.
[16:46.240 --> 16:52.840]  Go into our sponsors, Randy, Kelton, Brett, Alton, we've got a radio, a call in number
[16:52.840 --> 16:53.840]  512-646-1984.
[16:53.840 --> 16:54.840]  We've got some open spots.
[16:54.840 --> 16:55.840]  Give us a call.
[16:55.840 --> 16:56.840]  We'll be right back.
[16:56.840 --> 17:05.520]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[17:05.520 --> 17:09.200]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meyers Proven Method.
[17:09.200 --> 17:13.320]  Michael Meyers has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[17:13.320 --> 17:14.320]  can win two.
[17:14.320 --> 17:19.200]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.200 --> 17:24.960]  civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[17:24.960 --> 17:29.560]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[17:29.560 --> 17:33.800]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.800 --> 17:38.920]  The Michael Meyers Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.920 --> 17:41.040]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:41.040 --> 17:46.560]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meyers banner
[17:46.560 --> 17:49.040]  or email Michael Meyers at yahoo.com.
[17:49.040 --> 17:59.120]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[17:59.120 --> 18:00.120]  now.
[18:00.120 --> 18:04.640]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[18:04.640 --> 18:08.240]  In today's America, we live in a us against them society, and if we the people are ever
[18:08.240 --> 18:12.040]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.040 --> 18:15.640]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:15.640 --> 18:19.680]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.680 --> 18:23.520]  Traffic Courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.520 --> 18:25.000]  our rights through due process.
[18:25.000 --> 18:28.880]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[18:28.880 --> 18:32.640]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.640 --> 18:35.040]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:35.040 --> 18:39.080]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:39.080 --> 18:40.080]  ordering your copy today.
[18:40.080 --> 18:43.720]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.720 --> 18:47.440]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[18:47.440 --> 18:50.480]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.480 --> 18:54.440]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.440 --> 19:24.240]  For your copy today and together, we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:24.240 --> 19:41.640]  Thanks.
[19:41.640 --> 19:58.040]  Alright, this is the rule of law radio, and we're back.
[19:58.040 --> 20:04.080]  Randy Kelton, I'm Brett Fountain, and this is the 19th of March, 2021.
[20:04.080 --> 20:11.600]  When we went out, Randy, you were talking about propylene glycol versus ethylene glycol.
[20:11.600 --> 20:14.600]  Well, there's a lot of glycols in that group.
[20:14.600 --> 20:17.080]  I used to mix chemicals.
[20:17.080 --> 20:21.960]  I had a cleaning business, and I designed soaps and such.
[20:21.960 --> 20:28.080]  If we have two products that won't mix together, like we have SUGGI Bubbly, and we have what
[20:28.080 --> 20:30.680]  does the actual cleaning, what we call the cutters.
[20:30.680 --> 20:34.640]  Well, if you put the cutter in the SUGGI Bubbly, the cutter will attack the SUGGI Bubbly.
[20:34.640 --> 20:41.040]  So you put propylene glycol in with the SUGGI Bubbly, and then it'll mix right in with the
[20:41.040 --> 20:42.040]  other.
[20:42.040 --> 20:48.880]  So they're using something to carry, and you said the virus is wrapped in it.
[20:48.880 --> 20:51.040]  How does the virus get wrapped?
[20:51.040 --> 20:56.840]  Let's see if I can give this correctly.
[20:56.840 --> 21:03.720]  The whole idea of the COVID-19 vaccine, see, if you look propylene and ethylene glycol
[21:03.720 --> 21:05.920]  up, they will list one with the other.
[21:05.920 --> 21:13.200]  I know that ethylene glycol is really the antifreeze, but propylene glycol or ethylene
[21:13.200 --> 21:18.080]  glycol, you don't want those injected directly into your veins, believe me, neither one of
[21:18.080 --> 21:19.080]  them.
[21:19.080 --> 21:20.080]  But anyway, that's beside the point.
[21:20.080 --> 21:31.240]  Now, to answer your question, what happens is you've got the COVID-19 vaccine, and that
[21:31.240 --> 21:37.200]  is what they call a messenger RNA item.
[21:37.200 --> 21:43.400]  It's not really a vaccine, but that's beside the point, and I had sent you a legal thing
[21:43.400 --> 21:45.400]  on that before.
[21:45.400 --> 21:49.280]  They're actually misrepresenting.
[21:49.280 --> 21:53.840]  The government is breaking its own laws when they say it's a vaccine, and they're pushing
[21:53.840 --> 21:54.840]  it.
[21:54.840 --> 21:58.880]  But we'll get into that in another conversation if you want.
[21:58.880 --> 22:09.360]  Long story short, the vaccine goes into the body and the messenger RNA, I'm going to cut
[22:09.360 --> 22:21.280]  to the chase, it ends up causing the cells in the body to produce a protein.
[22:21.280 --> 22:26.560]  And this is a protein that is supposed to help your immune system.
[22:26.560 --> 22:30.640]  Well, when it comes right down to it, it doesn't.
[22:30.640 --> 22:37.760]  In fact, they have been realizing that it makes the immune system kind of go haywire.
[22:37.760 --> 22:44.640]  Now, where the propylene glycol comes in, it's widely used in the food industry.
[22:44.640 --> 22:53.040]  So, this vaccine is supposed to help the body produce this protein, and this protein is
[22:53.040 --> 22:59.600]  supposed to end up making you immune to the virus, but it doesn't.
[22:59.600 --> 23:05.680]  Pfizer and Moderna both admitted that it really doesn't build up your immunity, and it really
[23:05.680 --> 23:09.520]  doesn't prevent the spread of the virus, but that's another conversation.
[23:09.520 --> 23:15.280]  So, this propylene glycol is widely used in the food industry, and what happens, people
[23:15.280 --> 23:20.560]  have been exposed to it every day in the bread and the food, and the problem is when somebody
[23:20.560 --> 23:28.080]  gets the COVID shot, the propylene glycol in the vaccine reacts badly with the person receiving
[23:28.080 --> 23:35.200]  it, setting up a kind of a violent autoimmune reaction, because the people in the food have
[23:35.200 --> 23:42.480]  been repeatedly exposed to it, and then when they get the shot, it's like getting stung
[23:42.480 --> 23:48.880]  by a bee, getting stung by 10 bees 20 years ago, then you get stung by one bee later on
[23:48.880 --> 23:54.400]  and you react violently to it, because your body has already been sensitized.
[23:55.520 --> 23:57.520]  So, that's what happens here.
[23:58.880 --> 24:04.720]  The person gets that shot, and there's more propylene glycol, and it goes directly into the
[24:04.720 --> 24:11.280]  blood, which is a bad thing. You're bypassing the respiratory tract, you're bypassing your stomach,
[24:11.280 --> 24:17.520]  and anytime you bypass a system in the body, you can expect trouble. So, then when it gets into
[24:17.520 --> 24:27.920]  the blood, the propylene glycol gets perceived as a very dangerous chemical.
[24:28.640 --> 24:30.880]  Let me speak to that for a second.
[24:31.360 --> 24:31.840]  Passage.
[24:31.840 --> 24:46.240]  As a rule of thumb, you don't want any petroleum-based product on your skin.
[24:47.920 --> 24:54.720]  Your system tends to treat oils as oils. It doesn't recognize the difference between
[24:54.720 --> 25:04.080]  animal fat, coconut oil, and the petroleum oils. It draws it right through your skin.
[25:04.080 --> 25:09.520]  It'll go through your skin like it's not even there, drawn into your bloodstream, and then
[25:10.160 --> 25:16.560]  your system doesn't know what to do with it, because we haven't spent 200,000 years
[25:16.560 --> 25:25.280]  adjusting to those chemicals the way we have natural organic oils. So, in my business,
[25:26.480 --> 25:33.120]  if anything had propylene on it, I don't want it to touch me. But when I look at soaps and I see
[25:33.120 --> 25:40.720]  where propylene, ethylene, and there are several other glycols used as coupling agents, everybody
[25:40.720 --> 25:46.880]  wants their soap to look nice and clear and not cloudy, or they don't want it separating. Well,
[25:46.880 --> 25:52.400]  that's what these things do. For the most part, they don't help clean, but they've got really
[25:52.400 --> 26:00.960]  bad habits. There are other things they can use like ethylene, like linear alcohol,
[26:00.960 --> 26:07.600]  ethoxylates. They're made from coconut oil. They have the same effect, but they don't have
[26:07.600 --> 26:16.720]  bad effects on the body. So, anything gasoline, motor oil, it doesn't appear to hurt you when
[26:16.720 --> 26:24.960]  it gets on you. It's years later that it comes back to haunt you. Every side painter I ever knew,
[26:25.760 --> 26:35.280]  they all used the same, I've lost the term for the solvent they all used for there to
[26:35.280 --> 26:45.280]  clean their paint brushes and their hands, stuff with everyone. No, it was benzene, not the benzene.
[26:48.320 --> 26:54.880]  Every one of them wound up with cancer. Oh, yeah. Anything in the petroleum industry,
[26:54.880 --> 27:02.880]  a tire manufacturer, petroleum, you're subject to cancer, that's right. Just as a rule of thumb,
[27:02.880 --> 27:08.800]  if you look at any product list and you see products on there with propanol or propylene,
[27:12.000 --> 27:17.280]  they're linear alcohol, ethoxylates, if you check those and you find any of our petroleum based,
[27:17.280 --> 27:22.720]  you do not want to touch a new skin. That's right. And specifically, they have a habit
[27:22.720 --> 27:29.280]  of creating multiple myeloma, a very specific blood cancer. So, what happens is they get the shot
[27:29.280 --> 27:34.960]  and they send doctors believe that's what's responsible, the propylene glycol for most of
[27:34.960 --> 27:40.960]  the deaths that have been occurring soon after getting the shot. They have an autoimmune reaction
[27:40.960 --> 27:50.000]  to the propylene glycol. Then here's, and I can wrap this up pretty quick. Hold on, let me go to my
[27:50.000 --> 28:00.960]  next one. Here we go. Here's a background. So, people understand they've been trying to develop
[28:03.280 --> 28:11.360]  they've been trying to develop a vaccine for coronavirus since 2002. They were never able
[28:11.360 --> 28:17.360]  to market it because they couldn't prove safety. Now, what happened in their trials,
[28:17.360 --> 28:23.280]  the animals were injected with the vaccine. And to see if the vaccine actually worked,
[28:23.280 --> 28:30.080]  they would infect those test animals with coronavirus. But the animals either got very,
[28:30.080 --> 28:38.240]  very sick or died. All of them, they all got sick or they all died. So, vaccine manufacturers could
[28:38.240 --> 28:44.560]  not move forward because they certainly couldn't prove they were safe when all the test animals,
[28:44.560 --> 28:51.600]  all the test animals got either sick or died. Now comes the completely new,
[28:52.480 --> 29:00.000]  brand new, shiny concept of messenger RNA vaccines, which aren't really vaccines at all,
[29:00.880 --> 29:07.600]  with Pfizer and Moderna. It's not really a vaccine, but it's a gene-based modality.
[29:07.600 --> 29:16.240]  It literally hacks a person's gene. Now, they skipped the animal trials in this new batch of
[29:16.800 --> 29:23.120]  messenger RNA vaccine, new to the world. They skipped the animal trials completely,
[29:23.120 --> 29:28.800]  then that is irresponsible. And they knew why they skipped the animal trials because
[29:29.360 --> 29:34.960]  in all previous tests, even though the vaccines may not have been the same mechanism,
[29:34.960 --> 29:41.040]  all the animals died. Now, this is the first time I saw a little meme and it was kind of
[29:41.040 --> 29:47.920]  remember it's not actually a vaccine, has been tried on humans. And it was rushed into development
[29:48.720 --> 29:53.040]  because it's only been a few months that they've been doing this by a year.
[29:53.040 --> 29:58.800]  Okay, hang on, we're about to go to break. Brandy Kelton, Brett Felton, we'll be right back.
[29:58.800 --> 30:05.600]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk
[30:05.600 --> 30:09.840]  could predict how long you're going to live. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back
[30:09.840 --> 30:16.400]  to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you
[30:16.400 --> 30:21.440]  give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[30:21.440 --> 30:25.920]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights,
[30:25.920 --> 30:32.160]  say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:32.160 --> 30:37.040]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine
[30:37.040 --> 30:45.040]  alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. New research shows how fast
[30:45.040 --> 30:50.000]  you walk could predict how long you're going to live. The Journal of the American Medical Association
[30:50.000 --> 30:55.520]  reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected.
[30:55.520 --> 31:00.080]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[31:00.080 --> 31:04.800]  A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy
[31:04.800 --> 31:10.080]  as more traditional statistical measures. Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[31:10.080 --> 31:14.400]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. It only takes a stopwatch,
[31:14.400 --> 31:18.160]  some space to walk, and a few minutes. Researchers say it could help doctors
[31:18.160 --> 31:22.720]  identify older patients who need special care. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[31:22.720 --> 31:25.600]  more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.720 --> 32:00.080]  My uncle, my nephew, my son, go to buildingwhat.org. Why it's felt, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:22.720 --> 32:28.240]  God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Join Nana and guests for both
[32:28.240 --> 32:34.240]  verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:34.960 --> 32:39.600]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss
[32:39.600 --> 32:45.920]  one chapter per week. Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine
[32:45.920 --> 32:50.960]  as well as Christian character development. So mark your calendar and join us live on
[32:50.960 --> 32:57.840]  LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring
[32:57.840 --> 33:23.840]  and motivating discussion on the scriptures. Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:27.840 --> 33:55.520]  Okay, howdy, howdy, we're Andy Sheldon, we're at Mountain Real World Radio and we're talking to
[33:55.520 --> 34:06.080]  John in New York. Okay, go ahead John. Okay, so this is the first time where the danger comes in
[34:06.080 --> 34:10.720]  and then I want to be sure and say one of the most important parts of this. I could go on literally
[34:10.720 --> 34:17.280]  until midnight or one o'clock in the morning and tell you all the bad things that this vaccine does.
[34:18.080 --> 34:24.640]  But the most important thing I'm going to mention is that the doctors, it's not necessarily
[34:24.640 --> 34:30.400]  doctor's fault. You go to... Wait, hold on just a second John, before you go any further,
[34:31.200 --> 34:38.960]  back to propylene glycol. I pulled up the safety data sheet on propylene glycol and one interesting
[34:38.960 --> 34:45.680]  thing that it indicated. Exposure to large doses cause central nervous system depression.
[34:45.680 --> 34:53.120]  Chronic congestion may cause lactic acidosis and possible seizures. Injecting it into them
[34:53.120 --> 35:01.280]  directly into the bloodstream is like taking a bath and stuff because generally it has to
[35:01.280 --> 35:05.680]  work its way through the skin and the subcontaneous tissue before it gets to the bloodstream.
[35:06.320 --> 35:10.480]  So if you inject it straight into the bloodstream that may account for some of these seizures
[35:10.480 --> 35:17.520]  that we're seeing. Okay, I'll shut up now, go ahead John. No, no, no, you know more than the
[35:17.520 --> 35:22.960]  doctors do because they haven't been told this. It's not the doctor's fault. When you go to
[35:22.960 --> 35:28.160]  the doctor and you say, doc, could I have the COVID shot? And they'll say, well, you're in pretty
[35:28.160 --> 35:33.680]  good health. I think you should have it. The doctor has not been informed by pharmaceuticals
[35:33.680 --> 35:38.960]  or by the FDA who are in bed together and are known felons and known criminals.
[35:39.760 --> 35:46.320]  When you stop to consider that the pharmaceutical companies... I read this 10 years ago. I have
[35:46.320 --> 35:52.000]  no idea if it's still true now. 51% of the pharmaceuticals were owned by the mob.
[35:52.000 --> 35:57.360]  That's what I read. Now, I didn't verify it, but that's what I read. I have no reason to
[35:57.360 --> 36:02.960]  doubt it. And the other part of it was the pharmaceutical companies, when some of them
[36:02.960 --> 36:12.400]  first started out or early in their careers, they imported Nazi law criminals to come and run
[36:13.440 --> 36:20.960]  the pharmaceutical companies. And I have no reason to doubt that either. So if you wonder
[36:20.960 --> 36:26.320]  why the pharmaceutical companies and the FDA have no regard for human life, there's your reason.
[36:27.760 --> 36:32.480]  Okay. So it's the first time that a messenger RNA vaccine has ever been used on humans.
[36:33.440 --> 36:38.480]  It was rushed through production. And the reason why it was rushed through, somebody told me, no,
[36:38.480 --> 36:44.160]  it wasn't. I said, yes, it was. It takes five to 10 years to safely develop a new vaccine.
[36:44.160 --> 36:51.840]  Pfizer and Moderna are two companies that did so. And the fact that these two companies tell you
[36:52.720 --> 36:56.480]  they admitted that it doesn't really protect you from the virus and it doesn't stop it
[36:56.480 --> 37:03.520]  from spreading, that should send up a red flag. Yeah, like what's left? What's the whole point
[37:03.520 --> 37:09.600]  of having it if it doesn't do either of those things? Well, the point of calling it a vaccine
[37:09.600 --> 37:15.680]  of absolves the pharmaceutical company from any possibility of lawsuits.
[37:16.960 --> 37:25.600]  Bingo. You got it. You're a smart guy. There's a whole piece on that. They're hiding under
[37:25.600 --> 37:35.040]  the mantle of you can't do me. And it's not true. And the government is lying and misrepresenting.
[37:35.040 --> 37:41.280]  And it's criminal what they're doing. I can't think of the exact nomenclature of the whole thing,
[37:41.280 --> 37:50.960]  but it boils down to is fraud. And what's the word? Misrepresentation. That's a major
[37:50.960 --> 37:57.120]  misrepresentation. And they're doing that. They're saying that it's a vaccine and it's this,
[37:57.120 --> 38:03.040]  that and the other thing. And they're touting it as such. It's not. And there are other implications
[38:03.040 --> 38:08.960]  there too. And they're hiding behind that mantle of protection. And they don't want you to know
[38:08.960 --> 38:17.120]  that, obviously. So there's a laundry list of side effects. And I'll just go through them quick.
[38:17.840 --> 38:22.640]  Stegers. Remember what you were saying about propylene glycol? There's a laundry list
[38:22.640 --> 38:28.000]  of side effects, including seizures, miscarriages, serious neurological disorders,
[38:28.000 --> 38:33.840]  Killian bar syndrome. That's where the body eats it to the nerves. Bells palsy. That's when your
[38:33.840 --> 38:40.400]  face is paralyzed for a month. Very severe pain. That's it attacks the mitochondria.
[38:41.120 --> 38:47.040]  The those proteins attack the mitochondria in the cells. And the cells don't produce the energy
[38:47.040 --> 38:56.080]  that they're needed. So you get into pain, headache, real severe, lethargy, vision problems. And one
[38:56.080 --> 39:01.840]  big one is blood clot. And I've forgotten a few of them. And I'm going to explain this quick.
[39:01.840 --> 39:08.640]  In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was rushed to production in a few months, just like this
[39:08.640 --> 39:16.160]  messenger RNA shot was rushed to in a few months. A lot of people got very sick or died. It was
[39:16.160 --> 39:23.280]  pretty bad. I know because I warned a family in my town, who I was friends with, not to take the
[39:23.280 --> 39:30.320]  rushed to vaccine with swine flu, because it wouldn't be safe. It was rushed through. Well,
[39:30.320 --> 39:34.880]  that way they I'm not a doctor. So they went ahead and got it anyway. And a couple of the members
[39:34.880 --> 39:40.960]  of the family got real sick. And the above information that I've just given you is a quick
[39:40.960 --> 39:47.280]  summary. And then the last thing I'm going to say is the death, the death and adverse events
[39:47.280 --> 39:58.000]  from COVID shot. In one week, it went from 1,097 reported deaths, almost 1,100 reported deaths,
[39:58.000 --> 40:06.400]  to 1,278 reported deaths by the COVID vaccine. In one week, we went from 19,000 reported adverse
[40:06.400 --> 40:19.120]  events to over 25,000 reported adverse events. Those numbers come from VAERS. It stands for
[40:19.120 --> 40:26.000]  the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. And it's well known and established that VAERS
[40:26.000 --> 40:34.560]  captures only 10% of the actual reported adverse events. So we're probably looking at more like
[40:34.560 --> 40:42.720]  12,000 deaths. And I'm going to conclude by saying, do you know of any one single product
[40:42.720 --> 40:51.680]  in any industry across the board in any industry that is between 1200 and 12,000 people had been
[40:51.680 --> 40:58.480]  killed in using it in the first 10 weeks of production and use that it would still be on the
[40:58.480 --> 41:05.040]  market and not only on the market, but under heavy handed pushing to get people to use it?
[41:05.760 --> 41:15.840]  That itself tells you something is very, very wrong. Period. And doctors whose specialty is
[41:15.840 --> 41:23.280]  vaccines and infectious diseases, they have said in four months to 14 months from now,
[41:23.280 --> 41:30.000]  that's when we're really going to see all the damage this vaccine does to people. And especially
[41:30.000 --> 41:33.280]  like I said, especially with the damage to the mitochondria.
[41:35.120 --> 41:40.240]  But by that time, the vast majority of the public will already have been infected by it.
[41:40.240 --> 41:53.520]  Well, in his first 100 days, Aiden is boasting that he will have injected 100 million people,
[41:53.520 --> 41:58.240]  100 million Americans with this vaccine that's not a vaccine.
[42:00.640 --> 42:07.520]  And it's sort of like a keeps on giving. You see, it's got an on switch, but it's got no off switch.
[42:07.520 --> 42:13.280]  And that's where another problem comes in. It's like the energizer bunny. It doesn't quit.
[42:14.160 --> 42:19.600]  And it's been a close problem. And I'm very worried because I know some people that are
[42:19.600 --> 42:27.200]  misguided enough to have gotten the shot. And I'm concerned for them. I really am.
[42:29.040 --> 42:32.880]  And then they look at me and they say, well, you're not a doctor. How do you know all this?
[42:32.880 --> 42:38.320]  Well, when it was your job to do investigative reporting, and you get it for 40 years, you'll
[42:38.320 --> 42:46.000]  learn quite a bit, especially when you're interviewing doctors, local doctors, national
[42:46.000 --> 42:51.200]  specialists who are famous. I once talked to a multiple myeloma doctor and I was giving him
[42:51.200 --> 42:58.800]  ideas and so on and so forth. So I get this information. I don't just read it. I call doctors
[42:58.800 --> 43:05.120]  up on the phone. I conduct interviews with them. I did an AIDS interview with a doctor
[43:07.280 --> 43:14.640]  Barry Hurwitz many years ago. And I was giving him ideas and that he didn't know about. And
[43:14.640 --> 43:18.960]  he never used them. I'm sorry, he didn't. He'd have found that what I had said would have been
[43:18.960 --> 43:25.840]  true. But anyway, if you ever knew how easy it is to control the proliferation of HIV,
[43:25.840 --> 43:31.600]  I mean, it's ridiculous. All you got to do is take the proper amount of, well, it's certainly
[43:31.600 --> 43:38.400]  going to help a lot of your other vitals. Okay. Thank you. Do you have anything else for us, John?
[43:40.880 --> 43:46.560]  That's something about coverage. Thank you. Okay. Thank you, John. Tina, we will,
[43:47.280 --> 43:51.920]  let me try the, we've got a call. I think it's from New York because it looks like a first
[43:51.920 --> 43:58.000]  time caller. Hang on, Tina. We will get to you. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, root of live radio.
[44:00.320 --> 44:06.240]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.240 --> 44:11.120]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.120 --> 44:17.680]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. In a
[44:17.680 --> 44:23.360]  world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[44:23.360 --> 44:29.920]  provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[44:29.920 --> 44:36.400]  most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity so much. We became a marketing distributor
[44:36.400 --> 44:43.200]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[44:43.200 --> 44:49.040]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of
[44:49.040 --> 44:55.120]  young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[44:55.120 --> 45:02.720]  help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant
[45:02.720 --> 45:08.800]  in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to
[45:08.800 --> 45:16.800]  understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer,
[45:16.800 --> 45:21.520]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do
[45:21.520 --> 45:28.720]  for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary
[45:28.720 --> 45:35.200]  was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not
[45:35.200 --> 45:40.880]  in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[45:40.880 --> 45:46.560]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[45:46.560 --> 45:54.960]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[45:54.960 --> 46:10.880]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:25.760 --> 46:28.880]  I must be careful what I'm wishing for.
[46:30.160 --> 46:38.160]  When I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm wishing for. I ain't asking for much. I ain't
[46:38.160 --> 46:44.640]  trying to be no glutton. I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons.
[46:44.640 --> 46:54.640]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and
[46:56.160 --> 47:01.520]  do you know, I think we have a new caller. I'm going to try that again, and if not, we'll come
[47:01.520 --> 47:09.200]  right back to you. Okay, we have a caller with a New York area code. If you are from New York
[47:09.200 --> 47:20.320]  and you're on the line, talk to us. Well, that's not working out so good. If you can hear us,
[47:20.320 --> 47:25.600]  if you are trying to talk to us, and we can't hear you, you might try calling back in.
[47:26.480 --> 47:34.880]  Okay, we are going to Tina in California. Hello, Ms. Tina. Oh, yeah, by the way, Tina,
[47:34.880 --> 47:42.880]  uh, let's not tell Brett what we did to him last Friday when he wasn't here to defend himself.
[47:45.360 --> 47:51.600]  Well, that sounds ominous. You just warned him, he'll go and check the recording.
[47:52.880 --> 47:58.240]  Brett, Brett, who's that? Seems I've heard that name before, but he doesn't count anymore.
[47:59.440 --> 48:03.680]  Oh, he had great fun at your expense. Well, okay, I'm glad you were smiling then.
[48:03.680 --> 48:09.040]  Yeah, we were too. My wife and I got invited over to some people's house and we had dinner
[48:09.040 --> 48:14.160]  with some friends, so that was not very, this is something we don't get to do very often.
[48:15.120 --> 48:19.520]  Isaac, can you stand off? Isaac, you were getting drunk.
[48:23.120 --> 48:28.720]  No, that's something I haven't ever done yet. I've made all sorts of disparaging remarks about
[48:28.720 --> 48:36.960]  you and didn't feel guilty about one of them. Well, okay, I'm glad you had fun.
[48:38.880 --> 48:45.680]  What do you have for us today, Tina? Well, Brett, you know, I have to say, you know,
[48:45.680 --> 48:52.240]  he made fun of you, then he said you were partying and getting drunk and then he kept calling me Brett.
[48:52.240 --> 49:05.680]  So there was no schnapps deficiency on your end. No, no, no, no. We can't let that happen.
[49:10.000 --> 49:13.920]  Anyway, we had a bit of fun, but what I've got for you tonight is a couple of things.
[49:13.920 --> 49:19.600]  One, going back to the first caller and you talking about the state bar and everything,
[49:19.600 --> 49:26.080]  well, you know, I tried to get records from the streets. I was state bar and they said they were
[49:26.080 --> 49:32.000]  secret and I wasn't allowed to have them. But I had someone try to get them that, oh, no,
[49:32.000 --> 49:36.160]  they're not giving them to them. They're not even responding. So I'm wondering,
[49:36.160 --> 49:43.440]  some state bars do give information on complaints and some don't. California's the one that doesn't.
[49:43.440 --> 49:51.200]  But perhaps we could work out a deal where we each try to get information, let's say you
[49:51.200 --> 49:58.400]  want the information from a Texas state bar, then I send in the request and I want the information
[49:58.400 --> 50:03.920]  from our state bar and you send in the request. Then they really won't know what's happening
[50:03.920 --> 50:09.360]  and who's requesting what. That might, you know, do something, don't you think?
[50:09.360 --> 50:15.920]  That's what I'm hoping. I did a presentation last Tuesday night to a group.
[50:16.640 --> 50:30.880]  The, what was it? People's Rights.org. And there was surprisingly sophisticated group
[50:32.080 --> 50:36.880]  in that the structure of the group was very sophisticated and very well put together.
[50:36.880 --> 50:44.240]  It was their purpose that if one person gets in trouble, they can contact the group and whoever
[50:44.240 --> 50:53.520]  the state director of the group is will contact other people in your area and send them to witness
[50:53.520 --> 50:59.920]  and help you in whatever situation you're in. And they wanted to talk to me because they needed
[50:59.920 --> 51:07.120]  more tools they could use. And when you were talking about getting people from other states
[51:07.120 --> 51:15.920]  to file bar grievances, I was thinking about this group because the most difficult thing for
[51:16.880 --> 51:26.160]  these public officials to deal with is a third-party ringer. I do that on relatively often
[51:26.160 --> 51:31.920]  is I go in as a third-party ringer. Someone has an issue and I go in there and start
[51:32.960 --> 51:37.120]  stomping around in the courthouse and asking questions they don't want to answer and
[51:37.840 --> 51:41.840]  just generally giving them a hard time and they're wondering who is this guy?
[51:43.440 --> 51:48.160]  What is going on? How can we deal with this guy? We don't know who he is. We don't know what his
[51:48.160 --> 51:56.800]  motivation is. Even if we did, we don't have any way to deal with him. So that is a great idea.
[51:59.440 --> 52:05.280]  Yeah. And you know, one of the things you can do is let's say so if somebody doesn't have the money
[52:05.280 --> 52:12.720]  to send certified mail, you know, let's say you were going to send something for me because
[52:12.720 --> 52:23.200]  ignoring me, I can actually using the USPS priority mail online, I can go on and send
[52:23.840 --> 52:32.320]  my request and pay for it myself, but just have it come from someone else's address.
[52:32.320 --> 52:39.280]  So let's say I was to use your address, Randy. It would come from your address. It would go back
[52:39.280 --> 52:45.440]  to you, but I would be sending it at my expense. So that doesn't cost anyone anything except a
[52:45.440 --> 52:52.560]  little time and, you know, they could do vice versa for the other person. And we all saw how
[52:53.280 --> 52:59.920]  that probably worked in this case as all being on the court call because the judge kind of
[52:59.920 --> 53:08.960]  thought, no, what's going on here? So if multiple people requested the same thing from a state bar
[53:09.760 --> 53:17.680]  or the secretary of state, you know, maybe we get somewhere a little quicker. What do you think?
[53:19.760 --> 53:27.200]  Well, if anybody who's listening to my show know that what I consider a good strategy
[53:27.200 --> 53:35.360]  is giving them as much annoyance as possible. You know, these guys want to do business as
[53:35.360 --> 53:42.560]  usual. They've got a really well designed and well oiled machine that they can just turn the crank
[53:42.560 --> 53:49.200]  and shoot people in the front and spit them out the back. Well, we want to throw a few
[53:49.200 --> 53:59.600]  blocks in the cogs and jam the gears up as much as possible. I guess blocks in the cogs wasn't
[53:59.600 --> 54:05.760]  very good example. Brett, you got something better than that? Monkey wrench in the works.
[54:05.760 --> 54:12.320]  There you go. Let's throw a monkey wrench in the works. Something to slow them down and cause
[54:12.320 --> 54:21.840]  them to have to expend more capital than they can recover. Go ahead, Tina. I said in England,
[54:21.840 --> 54:28.160]  we say it's a spanner in the works. We call it a spanner, not a wrench. So you use a spanner wrench
[54:28.160 --> 54:40.480]  and we use a monkey wrench. You don't know what a monkey wrench is. For those, you know, it's not
[54:40.480 --> 54:48.080]  a pipe wrench. It looks like a pipe wrench. Except for the pipe wrench, the top head of the wrench
[54:48.080 --> 54:53.680]  moves back and forth and that causes it to squeeze down on the pipe wrench. But a monkey wrench is
[54:53.680 --> 55:02.720]  kind of a cross between a pipe wrench and a crescent wrench. Is that interesting trivia that nobody
[55:02.720 --> 55:12.640]  cares about? Okay. But it's interesting you're saying about these things. I don't know if other
[55:12.640 --> 55:21.360]  people... I'm trying to reopen my 2014 bankruptcy and I mentioned in the request to do it about the
[55:21.360 --> 55:29.600]  Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of her last acts before she passed away, was to really bring something in
[55:29.600 --> 55:37.440]  and the things that she thought about, you know, how it is the last thing for homeowners. And I
[55:37.440 --> 55:43.360]  had requested a bit, but she still caught me just denied me, even though she said, you know, I did
[55:43.360 --> 55:50.160]  very well in speaking and presenting and everything. But she, you know, she still denied me and I
[55:50.160 --> 56:01.040]  feel it's been six weeks and they still have not made a decision as to whether they will allow
[56:01.040 --> 56:08.640]  me to reopen. Now, you know, they always say, oh, it's all COVID, everything is delayed. But I'm
[56:08.640 --> 56:16.080]  wondering if it's just a blocking tactic. I call in every week and I said, should I write something
[56:16.080 --> 56:20.800]  in? And they said, no, no, no, you can, you know, I said, well, I'm just concerned to make sure that,
[56:21.520 --> 56:26.560]  you know, I'm on top of things and, you know, making sure nothing is missed and I don't want
[56:26.560 --> 56:31.680]  to be a nuisance. But should I go, oh, no, no, no, you're not a nuisance. You can call in every week.
[56:31.680 --> 56:39.200]  It's just in front of the judges, but it hasn't been, you know, moved on yet. Why does it take
[56:39.200 --> 56:44.160]  six weeks? Are they thinking, well, gosh, if we reopen, she's going to open a can of worms
[56:44.160 --> 56:49.440]  and we're going to get into trouble or what are they thinking here? I'm wondering.
[56:50.640 --> 56:57.360]  No, I don't think so. When I was helping people with foreclosure issues, it was routine
[56:58.160 --> 57:05.600]  for the Court of Appeals in every state that we filed one in to take between five and six months
[57:05.600 --> 57:12.800]  to respond. The Supreme in California took nine months. They denied our cert, but it took them
[57:12.800 --> 57:23.600]  nine months to deny it. So they're generally pretty backed up and they just, it generally takes,
[57:23.600 --> 57:30.880]  you can expect five to six months at least. Well, it's a long time to make a decision as to
[57:30.880 --> 57:40.000]  whether you can reopen a bankruptcy or throw it upon the Court. We'll see what happens, but
[57:40.000 --> 57:45.520]  I'll keep going. And today, by the way, in regard to my appeal on the declaratory judgment,
[57:45.520 --> 57:50.320]  I got a call from the other side because the Court had asked if I want to
[57:51.120 --> 57:57.280]  have a file for oral argument. And I filed saying I want, oh, we're going to the break.
[57:58.240 --> 58:01.840]  You ran off, okay. Go ahead. We've got 50 seconds.
[58:01.840 --> 58:09.200]  Well, I think we'll come back and talk about it on the other side because
[58:09.200 --> 58:16.080]  they don't know. Yeah, but if you wait to the other side, then I've got to fill up 30 seconds
[58:16.720 --> 58:25.440]  before the outro. And the only way I can fill up 30 seconds before the outro is talking about
[58:25.440 --> 58:32.080]  filling up 30 seconds before the outro. All right. And I did it. Wow, that is so meta.
[58:33.040 --> 58:40.160]  Randy Kelman. You read Fountain Rural Blower radio. We're having too much fun tonight. Hang on.
[58:40.960 --> 58:53.920]  We'll be right back. Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:53.920 --> 59:00.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really
[59:00.000 --> 59:05.200]  help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.200 --> 59:10.720]  today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know
[59:10.720 --> 59:16.880]  God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of
[59:16.880 --> 59:22.160]  the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents
[59:22.160 --> 59:28.640]  God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order your free
[59:28.640 --> 59:35.600]  New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll
[59:35.600 --> 01:00:00.080]  free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:00.080 --> 01:00:05.600]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:30.240 --> 01:00:41.360]  $27.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $1.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:45.840 --> 01:00:52.320]  Today in History, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[01:00:52.320 --> 01:00:57.360]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[01:00:57.360 --> 01:01:00.240]  killing 10 and injuring 40. Today in History.
[01:01:04.400 --> 01:01:08.960]  In recent news, since the Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing
[01:01:08.960 --> 01:01:13.600]  heaven to tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston,
[01:01:13.600 --> 01:01:17.680]  Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing
[01:01:17.680 --> 01:01:22.160]  to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:01:22.160 --> 01:01:27.040]  equipment to test the error for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney
[01:01:27.040 --> 01:01:31.760]  announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana
[01:01:31.760 --> 01:01:36.480]  cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General,
[01:01:36.480 --> 01:01:40.720]  stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana
[01:01:40.720 --> 01:01:45.600]  has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding
[01:01:45.600 --> 01:01:52.240]  of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the district attorney in El Paso,
[01:01:52.240 --> 01:01:57.200]  Kaima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote,
[01:01:57.200 --> 01:02:02.640]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue
[01:02:02.640 --> 01:02:07.440]  was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County,
[01:02:07.440 --> 01:02:11.840]  who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based
[01:02:11.840 --> 01:02:15.840]  on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something,
[01:02:15.840 --> 01:02:24.880]  the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five
[01:02:24.880 --> 01:02:29.840]  and a half inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico,
[01:02:29.840 --> 01:02:35.360]  the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[01:02:35.360 --> 01:02:40.720]  being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the
[01:02:40.720 --> 01:02:47.600]  shark's creates a lumus fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to
[01:02:47.600 --> 01:02:55.680]  lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This is work roadie with your lowdown for July
[01:02:55.680 --> 01:03:11.600]  22, 2019.
[01:03:25.680 --> 01:03:48.560]  Okay, we are back and we're talking to Tina in California.
[01:03:48.560 --> 01:03:56.240]  Yes, I was just about to say about the declaratory judgment and the appeal
[01:03:56.240 --> 01:04:05.760]  in the oral argument. I did file my form today asking for 15 minutes and I got a call. This is
[01:04:05.760 --> 01:04:12.880]  a week after I told them that, you know, we needed to speak because the form did say that,
[01:04:12.880 --> 01:04:19.120]  you know, council, each council needs to speak with the other about it. And they finally called
[01:04:19.120 --> 01:04:25.040]  me today and said, well, we're saying that we don't need to have oral argument, but if you're
[01:04:25.040 --> 01:04:30.640]  requesting it, then we're going to request 10 minutes to rebut whatever you say. And I said,
[01:04:30.640 --> 01:04:38.720]  okay, thank you very much. And she said, have a nice weekend. So I'm going to have to be very
[01:04:38.720 --> 01:04:47.200]  specific about my 15 minutes and rebuttal. Make sure I don't cover anything that's already in there,
[01:04:47.200 --> 01:04:59.920]  but maybe we should discuss, you know, you know, being very specific about how they have violated
[01:04:59.920 --> 01:05:08.240]  the law and maybe try to bring in something about the judges. I think you were discussing it earlier.
[01:05:09.760 --> 01:05:17.520]  You know, and it's going to be very, very careful about not, you know, going at the judges, but
[01:05:17.520 --> 01:05:25.520]  letting them know you're supposed to bar grieve anybody who's violated the law and they're not
[01:05:25.520 --> 01:05:32.320]  doing that is that something that we can try to bring in succinctly? What do you think?
[01:05:32.320 --> 01:05:39.840]  No, no, I would not touch that in this case. Okay. Yeah, that would, all that'll do is alienate the
[01:05:39.840 --> 01:05:48.480]  judges. Yeah. That's good for a different form. Here we're trying to get the judges to rule on
[01:05:48.480 --> 01:05:59.040]  this case. I would be very careful about that. I would only want to, I would want to just quickly
[01:05:59.040 --> 01:06:06.240]  narrow it down and remind the judges there's only one issue before the court. Anything that you may
[01:06:06.240 --> 01:06:12.000]  have filed in different courts are irrelevant to this particular issue. It is a petition for
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:20.640]  declaratory judgment. It is not an original petition. It's not a complaint in the court. It is a
[01:06:20.640 --> 01:06:30.240]  petition. You might indicate that you've had difficulty in the lower courts as they seem
[01:06:30.240 --> 01:06:37.040]  not to understand what a petition for declaratory judgment was and they treated your petition as
[01:06:37.040 --> 01:06:45.520]  if it were a complaint. That's a good point. And the main thing is to focus on only one issue.
[01:06:46.400 --> 01:06:54.640]  And the second section of that statute, the first section for those of you who are not
[01:06:55.200 --> 01:07:00.160]  familiar with what we're talking about, remember the Christmas, not the Christmas story,
[01:07:00.160 --> 01:07:11.760]  the one in Christmas. It's a wonderful life. Yeah. The last scene they're having a note burning
[01:07:11.760 --> 01:07:20.240]  party. When you pay off your mortgage, you get your original promise to pay back
[01:07:22.080 --> 01:07:27.920]  and burn it to make sure nobody else gets it and uses it in court to try to make a claim against you.
[01:07:27.920 --> 01:07:37.200]  The problem with securitization is they spread the claim all over the place and they had these
[01:07:37.200 --> 01:07:48.480]  notes around that it was the promise to pay and essentially whoever holds that note
[01:07:48.480 --> 01:07:57.200]  holds it similar to a bearer bond. So they wanted to make sure that while they're
[01:07:57.760 --> 01:08:05.920]  doing their investments in these pools and selling tranches off the investments to different
[01:08:05.920 --> 01:08:14.240]  investors and just constantly moving around to hold their status, they didn't want someone
[01:08:14.240 --> 01:08:21.280]  picking up this note and filing a claim in the court because during the foreclosure crisis we've
[01:08:21.280 --> 01:08:29.920]  had several people contact me where they had been foreclosed on and then a year or so later
[01:08:29.920 --> 01:08:37.520]  they get foreclosed on again. The problem with that is if the wrong party forecloses on you
[01:08:37.520 --> 01:08:46.640]  and takes your property and sells it, the right party still has a claim. So they can come back on
[01:08:46.640 --> 01:08:55.280]  you and once your property has been foreclosed on and taken you still owe the debt. So it's important
[01:08:55.280 --> 01:09:01.440]  that you get that promise to pay back and it's important that whoever holds the claim holds the
[01:09:01.440 --> 01:09:16.320]  promise. So this statute required that when a mortgage was satisfied that the original note
[01:09:16.320 --> 01:09:26.400]  B returned to the mortgage or and that's what Tina asked and she was raising this issue in court to
[01:09:26.400 --> 01:09:31.520]  make sure that the person doing the foreclosure actually had standing to do that and the way
[01:09:31.520 --> 01:09:39.600]  you do that and the way you enforce a promise to pay is you bring the promise to pay and show it
[01:09:39.600 --> 01:09:44.560]  to the court. I got this promise to pay. Well, they're foreclosing owner and she asked for the
[01:09:44.560 --> 01:09:51.440]  promise to pay. Well, they didn't have it but the lawyer said we have it, we will produce it
[01:09:51.440 --> 01:09:57.840]  but he claimed that we didn't have to produce it until the mortgage was satisfied. But to belay
[01:09:57.840 --> 01:10:08.640]  this argument, the lawyer promised in writing to produce it after the foreclosure was completed.
[01:10:08.640 --> 01:10:15.200]  So she said, okay, I'll stop fighting with that now. Did he didn't produce it?
[01:10:15.200 --> 01:10:25.520]  And consider all it would take was take the note, put it in an envelope and send it to her. It's not
[01:10:25.520 --> 01:10:32.240]  like it's difficult. So why don't you have to sue him to get it? Why don't you just give it to her?
[01:10:34.320 --> 01:10:40.240]  Wouldn't that kind of give you reason to believe that maybe he never had it in the first place?
[01:10:40.240 --> 01:10:52.240]  She had a promise under the requirements of this statute, had it in writing and just asked
[01:10:52.240 --> 01:11:01.520]  him to abide by his promise and he won't do it. And when she filed the petition for declaratory
[01:11:01.520 --> 01:11:09.120]  judgment, a petition for declaratory judgment has no claims. You're not trying to get money from the
[01:11:09.120 --> 01:11:17.360]  other side or sanctions against him. All you're trying to get is for the judge to rule on the
[01:11:17.360 --> 01:11:28.320]  rights of the parties and she asked the court, do I have a right to receive the original note
[01:11:28.320 --> 01:11:39.760]  that I signed once the mortgage is satisfied? That's all that's before the court, nothing else.
[01:11:39.760 --> 01:11:46.480]  And the court is arguing, oh, this is real, this is Res Junicata, she sued for this, she sued for that, she sued for the other.
[01:11:47.760 --> 01:11:52.880]  So what? What does that have to do with the law in the matter?
[01:11:52.880 --> 01:12:04.080]  Does the lender have to return the mortgage under $29.41 California code? That's it.
[01:12:05.520 --> 01:12:12.240]  They know they have to, they know they have no argument. So they try to distract with all kinds
[01:12:12.240 --> 01:12:20.880]  of garbage. So that's where we're at, that's what Tina is in the position now where she's going
[01:12:20.880 --> 01:12:28.560]  for the appeals court and making this argument. And it was a good petition for declaratory judgment
[01:12:28.560 --> 01:12:34.880]  because if they rule against her, they essentially nullify a piece of legislation.
[01:12:37.520 --> 01:12:40.880]  And the court of appeals is really averse to doing that.
[01:12:42.960 --> 01:12:49.760]  So Tina, what are you going to tell them? Well, maybe what you just said that if they
[01:12:49.760 --> 01:12:55.360]  rule, you know, to bring up that fact that if you, if the judges rule against me in this,
[01:12:55.360 --> 01:13:02.720]  you've effectively nullified a piece of legislation when in fact we really need to clarify
[01:13:03.360 --> 01:13:13.200]  what it says because it does not state that the, you know, the party asking for it, it doesn't say,
[01:13:13.200 --> 01:13:20.800]  oh, only if you're not in foreclosure. But the other side and the trial court judge, you said
[01:13:21.440 --> 01:13:23.920]  you were not the beneficiary and you were not the
[01:13:26.320 --> 01:13:34.480]  trustee because it was a foreclosure. Well, it doesn't specifically say you can only request
[01:13:35.040 --> 01:13:42.560]  the original note if you were not in foreclosure. It doesn't say, you know, and Sally,
[01:13:42.560 --> 01:13:49.760]  Uncle Fred, the Queen of England, you know, the President of the United States can't pay it off.
[01:13:49.760 --> 01:13:56.560]  It just says once the loan is fully satisfied and if you're in foreclosure because they are
[01:13:56.560 --> 01:14:05.840]  trying to take your property, you can only fully satisfy it if your equity has allowed them to
[01:14:05.840 --> 01:14:12.320]  fully satisfy it. And it was my equity in the property that was harder and that allowed them to
[01:14:12.320 --> 01:14:18.880]  fully satisfy it at this illegal foreclosure. What they're making is an irrelevant argument.
[01:14:19.600 --> 01:14:30.720]  The statute does not address who satisfies the note or how the note is satisfied. It only
[01:14:30.720 --> 01:14:39.440]  addresses if and when the note is satisfied. The rest is irrelevant by the statute. If the
[01:14:39.440 --> 01:14:47.840]  legislature had intended that a certain party satisfy the note in order to invoke this statute,
[01:14:48.640 --> 01:14:53.040]  statutory requirement, they would have said so. But they didn't.
[01:14:53.040 --> 01:15:04.560]  And all they said was satisfied. And it is the place of lawyers to distort and
[01:15:04.560 --> 01:15:10.960]  wordcraft to win their side of the argument. But if you, as the court of appeals,
[01:15:10.960 --> 01:15:22.480]  deny this, then you have essentially nullified legislation that you're going to have to fix later.
[01:15:23.520 --> 01:15:29.120]  And generally, that's what's important to the court of appeals. They don't want to render rulings
[01:15:29.120 --> 01:15:36.160]  that will nullify legislation. That's definitely going to get turned over later. And if the
[01:15:36.160 --> 01:15:42.560]  appeals court denies you, this is the kind of thing that the court or that the supreme
[01:15:42.560 --> 01:15:48.960]  is likely to pick up on a certiorary. And you might mention that too. And this is certainly
[01:15:48.960 --> 01:15:59.280]  something that the supreme would rule on to avoid the nullification of the clear letter of the law
[01:15:59.280 --> 01:16:08.800]  and legislation. Very good point. That's something that I should craft to burn in my 10 minutes.
[01:16:08.800 --> 01:16:16.720]  And let's see how they rebut that after I make my statement. Because, you know, as you said,
[01:16:16.720 --> 01:16:22.640]  yeah, it's really going to... And that'll be something that hasn't already been before the court.
[01:16:22.640 --> 01:16:32.320]  So I need to craft this together and put a statement together. And I'll bring it to you
[01:16:32.320 --> 01:16:39.520]  and Brett to check it over. Good, good. We probably need to do a phone call and have you
[01:16:39.520 --> 01:16:44.080]  do a presentation to me. And I'll be sitting there saying, so what? So what? What's that after?
[01:16:44.080 --> 01:16:51.840]  So what? The time I get done with you, these judges will be a piece of cake. Randy Kelton,
[01:16:51.840 --> 01:16:57.760]  Brett Fouton, Rue de la Radio, a call in number 5126461984.
[01:17:00.080 --> 01:17:04.560]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.200 --> 01:17:10.800]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method. Michael Mirris has won six cases
[01:17:10.800 --> 01:17:15.600]  in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step
[01:17:15.600 --> 01:17:20.640]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:17:20.640 --> 01:17:26.400]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.400 --> 01:17:30.960]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the financial tables on them
[01:17:30.960 --> 01:17:36.960]  and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how
[01:17:36.960 --> 01:17:42.000]  to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[01:17:42.000 --> 01:17:47.600]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email Michael
[01:17:47.600 --> 01:17:57.120]  Mirris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:17:57.120 --> 01:18:02.560]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love logos. Without the shows on this network,
[01:18:02.560 --> 01:18:06.960]  I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going
[01:18:06.960 --> 01:18:12.640]  back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network
[01:18:12.640 --> 01:18:16.720]  on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really
[01:18:16.720 --> 01:18:22.000]  don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:26.960]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:26.960 --> 01:18:31.280]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.280 --> 01:18:38.480]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order
[01:18:38.480 --> 01:18:44.720]  anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No.
[01:18:44.720 --> 01:18:50.800]  Do I have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes.
[01:18:50.800 --> 01:18:56.800]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.800 --> 01:19:06.800]  We are welcome. Happy holidays, logos. This is the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:19:06.800 --> 01:19:22.800]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:36.800 --> 01:19:46.800]  Oh,
[01:20:07.120 --> 01:20:14.560]  okay. We are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rural Radio and Tina. Oh, do you have anything
[01:20:14.560 --> 01:20:22.480]  else? We've got a full board of callers again. Oh, I guess if I unmute you, I can tell them.
[01:20:22.480 --> 01:20:28.880]  Okay, go ahead, Tina. The only thing I would say is the lawsuit I filed against the attorney for
[01:20:28.880 --> 01:20:37.920]  the promissory fraud in relation to this case, they are avoiding service. The offices apparently
[01:20:37.920 --> 01:20:44.160]  closed down under lock and key and security guards are there not letting anyone in the building,
[01:20:44.160 --> 01:20:50.000]  not accepting anything. They have been attempted to serve the attorney at home. He's not there at
[01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:54.960]  9.30 at night according to this female there. He's not there at 7 o'clock in the morning.
[01:20:54.960 --> 01:21:01.120]  So, they are continuing to try to serve him, but he's avoiding service. So, we'll...
[01:21:01.920 --> 01:21:08.320]  La, la, la, la. I can't hear you. What you might do is have somebody go out there and
[01:21:09.280 --> 01:21:16.720]  grab the fender of his car and bounce it up and down, unless he has it in the garage.
[01:21:18.400 --> 01:21:23.840]  Oh, probably in Manhattan Beach, California, it's a multi-million dollar home. So, yes,
[01:21:23.840 --> 01:21:30.400]  I'm sure he has it in the garage. Okay, in Texas, it is a felony to evade service.
[01:21:32.160 --> 01:21:40.160]  You might check to see if there's a challenge to make in California. If not, then you might
[01:21:40.160 --> 01:21:48.160]  petition the court to serve by publication. That's what I will have to do if we cannot
[01:21:48.160 --> 01:21:55.440]  serve him. I would like to serve him before this appeal court hearing, because then he may not
[01:21:55.440 --> 01:22:02.480]  have to be able to be there because he is party to a lawsuit. So, we'll have to see.
[01:22:04.160 --> 01:22:07.920]  Can you serve in California by certified mail?
[01:22:07.920 --> 01:22:20.080]  Not in terms of an actual summons and complaint, but they could serve me on this motion by regular
[01:22:20.080 --> 01:22:30.960]  mail related to the interim, but I can't serve them. Okay, hold on. There's sometimes a restriction
[01:22:30.960 --> 01:22:40.240]  on service for the original petition. Yes. So, that one generally has to be done by a process
[01:22:40.240 --> 01:22:46.880]  server or by certain, they have to be personally served. So, it's probably the same there, but
[01:22:46.880 --> 01:22:56.000]  you might check to see if there is a law on evading service. I won't do that.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:02.240]  Okay. Thank you, Tina. So, go to the other colas. Thank you for everything as usual,
[01:23:02.240 --> 01:23:05.040]  and Ted, keep on. Hold on, Tina. Hold on.
[01:23:05.840 --> 01:23:11.600]  Go ahead and comment. Well, I wanted to check and see if you would like to look at the registered
[01:23:11.600 --> 01:23:20.640]  mail option. That's the red one instead of the green one. Registered mail goes to a natural man
[01:23:20.640 --> 01:23:27.520]  or a woman, no fictions, not even titles. It goes to an actual real man or woman,
[01:23:28.800 --> 01:23:34.320]  so they don't end up with somebody saying at the front desk, oh, they're not here right now,
[01:23:34.320 --> 01:23:40.160]  I'll sign for it, and then they play games about that. It goes to the actual person in the United
[01:23:40.160 --> 01:23:49.360]  States Postal Service treats it as sort of a hot potato security-wise. They do all this lock and key
[01:23:49.360 --> 01:23:56.720]  hand-to-hand stuff. So, something to consider. That's a good point. That's a very good point,
[01:23:56.720 --> 01:24:00.480]  especially in light of the COVID. If they've closed the office down, they're still getting
[01:24:00.480 --> 01:24:06.640]  mailed somewhere, aren't they? Because people are still mailing to them. So, who's picking up the
[01:24:06.640 --> 01:24:13.760]  mail and delivering it to the parties? That is an interesting question. So, yes, I will look
[01:24:13.760 --> 01:24:19.520]  into that, and I will ask the legal service that I paid to serve them what they think of that,
[01:24:19.520 --> 01:24:25.840]  because they do this all the time, so they should know. So, great point, Brett. Thank you.
[01:24:25.840 --> 01:24:33.360]  Cool. If he's a lawyer, you might be able to look in the court record to see when his name
[01:24:33.360 --> 01:24:46.400]  shows up for a hearing. Good idea. All hearings right now are by Zoom. Yeah. Okay. Well, we'll
[01:24:46.400 --> 01:24:50.800]  work on that. I do need to get going. We're running out of time, and we've got a bunch of callers.
[01:24:51.840 --> 01:24:57.200]  Yes. Thank you very much. Talk to you later. Okay. Thank you, Tina. Okay, now we're going to
[01:24:57.200 --> 01:25:07.440]  Graham. I've got Eric underscore Graham out of Colorado.
[01:25:07.440 --> 01:25:28.640]  Eric? That's the first time I've got confirmation to have my listeners to sleep.
[01:25:28.640 --> 01:25:34.640]  Well, that is good.
[01:25:38.800 --> 01:25:44.320]  If he calls back, are we going to have great fun at this expense?
[01:25:46.080 --> 01:25:53.920]  Okay. I guess we're not going to talk to Eric. Okay. Now we're going to Bob in California.
[01:25:53.920 --> 01:26:03.280]  Hello, Bob. What have you been up to lately? Well, at least you're not snowing.
[01:26:08.080 --> 01:26:18.640]  I called in tonight. I was in the DMV. Well, I tried to go to the DMV, and they wouldn't
[01:26:18.640 --> 01:26:26.800]  let me in the door unless I would take a temperature to my forehead. And I said, no,
[01:26:26.800 --> 01:26:32.240]  I'd let them do one on my wrist, but not my forehead, and they wouldn't allow me entrance.
[01:26:33.760 --> 01:26:39.040]  So I kind of want to get some feedback on where I might go with that.
[01:26:39.040 --> 01:26:50.080]  Well, when they wouldn't let me in the courthouse without a mask, I asked the bailiff. I said,
[01:26:50.080 --> 01:26:55.360]  are you willing to use force to prevent me from entering the courthouse? He said, yes, I am.
[01:26:57.040 --> 01:27:02.880]  I see you were in a pistol. If necessary, you prepared to use that pistol to keep me from
[01:27:02.880 --> 01:27:08.800]  entering the courthouse. He said, yes, I am. The other bailiff standing there, I could see him.
[01:27:08.800 --> 01:27:15.280]  He's wanting to say something, but this is his sarch. He's afraid to over there with sign language.
[01:27:15.280 --> 01:27:23.200]  Don't say it. Don't say it. No, don't do that. He said, yes. Oh, wow. Well, I guess I better not
[01:27:23.200 --> 01:27:32.480]  come in without a mask. So I took out my cell phone.911. Every time I've come in after that,
[01:27:32.480 --> 01:27:38.080]  he's been real reluctant to even speak to me. So you might try that, Bob, but
[01:27:41.760 --> 01:27:45.440]  where did you say this was? Was it a government building? Department of Motor Vehicle.
[01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:50.960]  Yeah. Okay. DMV. Okay. Yeah. Then they denied your access to a public building.
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:57.680]  And what about the, well, even if there is an order from the governor, the governor can't
[01:27:57.680 --> 01:28:06.720]  issue an order that affects you. So if you get denied access and they do it because the governor
[01:28:06.720 --> 01:28:12.400]  issued an illegal order, why don't you try to find a criminal complaint against the governor?
[01:28:12.400 --> 01:28:25.680]  I got a sample. Yeah, I read it. I'm part of it. Yeah, I like it. So file against the governor.
[01:28:25.680 --> 01:28:39.120]  You know, he's kind of on the rocks right now. Is there a Republican prosecutor anywhere in California?
[01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:53.200]  I think there might be one in Yuba County. Go down there and try to go into courthouse
[01:28:53.200 --> 01:28:57.600]  and get them to block here or try to go in some government building, get them to block here,
[01:28:58.640 --> 01:29:07.680]  and then file with that district attorney. See, when I went to the district attorney in
[01:29:07.680 --> 01:29:15.200]  Travis County, I told him, I have a present for you. And once the district attorney looked at it,
[01:29:15.200 --> 01:29:23.920]  I think she saw it that way because she took it with no problem. Okay, I'll look into that.
[01:29:28.560 --> 01:29:34.480]  That's really what I had on my mind. I've got a lot of other things on my mind, but I'd like to
[01:29:34.480 --> 01:29:46.080]  recommend the caller. Okay, we don't have any other callers. Did Eric drop off and come back?
[01:29:46.080 --> 01:29:50.320]  Maybe he woke up. Okay, we'll try one when we come back. Randy Kelton, rest fountain,
[01:29:50.320 --> 01:29:54.480]  little radio. Thank you, Bob. We'll be right back.
[01:29:54.480 --> 01:30:07.200]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. If you build an electrical smart grid,
[01:30:07.200 --> 01:30:11.520]  the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic blackout.
[01:30:11.520 --> 01:30:15.120]  And Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:15.760 --> 01:30:21.440]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.440 --> 01:30:25.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.480 --> 01:30:32.640]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:32.640 --> 01:30:37.280]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.280 --> 01:30:43.280]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.280 --> 01:30:50.080]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into your
[01:30:50.080 --> 01:30:55.680]  home too with a smart grid. So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely
[01:30:55.680 --> 01:31:01.360]  monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure. But cybersecurity expert David
[01:31:01.360 --> 01:31:06.400]  Chalk says not so fast if we make the national power grid controllable through the web,
[01:31:06.400 --> 01:31:12.480]  hackers will have a field day. Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation,
[01:31:12.480 --> 01:31:18.800]  leaving us vulnerable to our enemies. I'd want to pose smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[01:31:18.800 --> 01:31:23.120]  The catastrophic failures caused by hackers? There's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.680 --> 01:31:28.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.200 --> 01:31:36.640]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.640 --> 01:31:41.520]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1500 architects and engineers have
[01:31:41.520 --> 01:31:46.000]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:50.880]  their lives. Thousands of my fellow force respond as if lying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a
[01:31:50.880 --> 01:31:55.200]  structural engineer. I'm a New York City correctional. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm the father who lost
[01:31:55.200 --> 01:32:01.040]  his son. We are Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.720 --> 01:32:06.720]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[01:32:06.720 --> 01:32:10.560]  we live in an us against them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.560 --> 01:32:14.640]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[01:32:14.640 --> 01:32:18.640]  travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[01:32:18.640 --> 01:32:23.120]  the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to
[01:32:23.120 --> 01:32:27.200]  learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy
[01:32:27.200 --> 01:32:30.800]  Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive
[01:32:30.800 --> 01:32:34.640]  teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold
[01:32:34.640 --> 01:32:38.560]  reports to the Rule of Law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to
[01:32:38.560 --> 01:32:43.120]  RuleofLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's
[01:32:43.120 --> 01:32:47.120]  book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, a deal and audio of the original
[01:32:47.120 --> 01:32:51.600]  2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how
[01:32:51.600 --> 01:32:55.600]  to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com. Order your
[01:32:55.600 --> 01:32:59.200]  copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:59.200 --> 01:33:11.680]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:30.080 --> 01:33:36.560]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Felton, Brett Felton, the Rule of Law Radio on this Friday,
[01:33:37.280 --> 01:33:45.680]  the 19th day of March, 2021, and we're going back to Eric. He dropped off a call back in.
[01:33:47.040 --> 01:33:51.440]  Hello, Eric. Hi, this is actually Eric's wife. It's a
[01:33:51.440 --> 01:33:57.120]  system name that comes up on my phone. Can you hear me? Yes, but I'm having a little trouble
[01:33:57.120 --> 01:34:00.400]  understanding you. Can you move the phone a little away from your mouth?
[01:34:03.600 --> 01:34:09.040]  Hello? Okay, that's much better. Okay, what do you have for us today?
[01:34:10.640 --> 01:34:19.040]  Yes, I'm just calling in to talk about, I know that there's a lot of recourse that we can have
[01:34:19.040 --> 01:34:29.680]  by taking down the names of public servants who are, you know, requiring masks and other things
[01:34:29.680 --> 01:34:38.000]  like that. But I'm wondering what would you would suggest for children? Because, for example,
[01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:49.760]  in, I live in the University Town of Durham, New Hampshire, where, for example, if my daughter
[01:34:49.760 --> 01:34:54.880]  were to try to get on the school bus, she would be denied entry right at that point.
[01:34:55.840 --> 01:35:02.320]  And she can't go to school without a mask according to requirements. And of course,
[01:35:02.320 --> 01:35:09.920]  they're citing governor mandates. So, I understand, I think, you know, making a complaint to the
[01:35:09.920 --> 01:35:22.560]  governor about the governor's, you know, unlawful mandates is a start. But where would you start
[01:35:22.560 --> 01:35:29.760]  as far as there's a difference? Because I can go walk in somewhere and demand my raise. But
[01:35:29.760 --> 01:35:40.560]  when it comes to my daughter, it's a lot more complicated because the kids, you know, my daughter,
[01:35:41.120 --> 01:35:49.440]  I don't want to traumatize her by making her be part of these controversies going on.
[01:35:50.320 --> 01:35:57.440]  I am glad you said that. Because I'm sitting here as a grandpa. And I'm thinking,
[01:35:57.440 --> 01:36:09.760]  do I impose my fight on my children? Because I know how sensitive they are to the group that
[01:36:09.760 --> 01:36:22.160]  they're in. So, I'm thinking about how we fix this and probably the best way to fix it is to
[01:36:22.160 --> 01:36:32.000]  file an action against the school or, more appropriately, consider a petition for declaratory
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:40.480]  judgment. There you go. Okay. A petition for declaratory judgment doesn't ask for any damages.
[01:36:41.920 --> 01:36:50.560]  But formulate your question. Does the school have the authority to deny your child access to an
[01:36:50.560 --> 01:37:02.960]  education? Simply because she doesn't follow some arbitrary requirement that the school places on
[01:37:02.960 --> 01:37:19.040]  her. I'm thinking, how do we ask this question so that it is the most difficult for the school to
[01:37:19.040 --> 01:37:28.800]  get around? This is not just about a mask. This is about wearing a Trump t-shirt to a school in a
[01:37:28.800 --> 01:37:40.000]  democratic neighborhood. Yeah, the other important issues I want to try to address at the same time
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:50.960]  include the temperature taking of a medical intervention, you know, and to gain access.
[01:37:51.760 --> 01:37:59.760]  And also the future requirement for the vaccine. Okay. I was going to say about the temperature.
[01:37:59.760 --> 01:38:11.520]  It's not invasive. And I would want to ask myself, why am I raising that particular issue? But the
[01:38:11.520 --> 01:38:24.640]  vaccine, that's a big deal. You know, I do this show and I get more fights available to me than I
[01:38:24.640 --> 01:38:31.280]  could ever get into. So I've learned over the years to pick my fights real careful.
[01:38:33.120 --> 01:38:43.120]  Yeah. Which fight, which fight could you have that would tend to affect all of these issues?
[01:38:43.120 --> 01:38:57.760]  I'm going to suggest challenging the order of the governor and anyone who would add a restriction
[01:38:58.480 --> 01:39:06.480]  against the exercise of one of your rights that exceed the liberty granted by the federal
[01:39:06.480 --> 01:39:18.080]  constitution. A state can issue legislation and rulings that grant you more rights than the
[01:39:18.080 --> 01:39:27.840]  fed does. Or a county can grant you more rights than the state does. But they cannot grant you
[01:39:27.840 --> 01:39:39.200]  less rights. So how is this constitutional in that your child has a right to school?
[01:39:41.520 --> 01:39:49.680]  How does the school get authority to restrict that right by some arbitrary or capricious
[01:39:49.680 --> 01:40:00.000]  ruling on the part of the school? How does that sound? How does the school have the authority
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:07.440]  to say that last part one more time? How do they gain the authority to restrict
[01:40:08.160 --> 01:40:17.440]  your child in a right that is granted beyond what is granted by the United States Constitution?
[01:40:17.440 --> 01:40:25.760]  Great. Great question. So that would be a petition for declaratory judgment?
[01:40:26.640 --> 01:40:34.160]  Yes. And have you listened to the show before? Do you know what that entails?
[01:40:35.600 --> 01:40:42.960]  No. Okay. The difference between a civil complaint and a petition for declaratory judgment
[01:40:42.960 --> 01:40:57.760]  is the legislature about 20 years ago passed the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2001.
[01:40:58.960 --> 01:41:06.960]  And it allowed someone to petition the court for a ruling on the rights of the parties.
[01:41:06.960 --> 01:41:17.280]  The declaratory judgment contains no claims. If you file any federal suit today after the ruling
[01:41:17.280 --> 01:41:25.520]  in Ashkoff B. Twombly, the other side as a matter of course will petition to dismiss for failure
[01:41:25.520 --> 01:41:35.280]  to state a claim on which recovery can be had under Rule 12B6. And the judge can make a determination
[01:41:35.280 --> 01:41:42.880]  as to whether or not your claim is sufficient. This is a change, was a change in law that
[01:41:42.880 --> 01:41:48.880]  it changed the pleading requirements that had been in place for 200 years.
[01:41:50.400 --> 01:41:58.800]  It was a really big deal. Now the judges can toss cases pretty much at their caprice.
[01:41:58.800 --> 01:42:06.560]  So if you go with a declaratory judgment, a declaratory judgment has no claims.
[01:42:07.520 --> 01:42:12.800]  You don't ask for any damages. You don't ask for court costs. You don't ask for attorney fees.
[01:42:12.800 --> 01:42:19.760]  You don't ask for anything other than you ask the court to rule on the rights of the parties.
[01:42:19.760 --> 01:42:29.840]  And here you're asking the court to rule. Does a school have the authority to restrict a constitutional
[01:42:29.840 --> 01:42:38.560]  right beyond the restrictions or beyond the rights allowed by the federal constitution?
[01:42:40.640 --> 01:42:45.280]  It's well established. They can grant you more liberty than the Constitution does.
[01:42:45.280 --> 01:42:53.200]  And it's very well established. They cannot restrict your liberty beyond what the federal
[01:42:53.200 --> 01:43:00.160]  constitution allows. So that's the question you want to make. Regardless to the efficacy or
[01:43:01.520 --> 01:43:05.840]  effectiveness of masks or temperature taking or any of these other things,
[01:43:07.360 --> 01:43:12.480]  they're irrelevant as concerns the restriction of a right.
[01:43:12.480 --> 01:43:16.880]  Yeah, because you don't want to get down a rabbit trail talking about
[01:43:16.880 --> 01:43:22.960]  which thing is more effective and whether or not it makes sense to do something.
[01:43:22.960 --> 01:43:25.680]  Do they have a right to make it mandatory?
[01:43:27.840 --> 01:43:29.040]  Do they have that authority?
[01:43:29.040 --> 01:43:33.920]  Don't confuse it with, yeah, don't confuse it with the details. Thank you.
[01:43:33.920 --> 01:43:43.040]  And then you can drag them, drag the schoolings of federal courts. That'd be great fun.
[01:43:45.040 --> 01:43:53.040]  Okay, thank you. Now we're about to go to our sponsors. We've got one more segment left.
[01:43:54.400 --> 01:43:57.360]  And hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:43:57.360 --> 01:44:06.320]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.320 --> 01:44:11.200]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.200 --> 01:44:17.440]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.440 --> 01:44:22.240]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:22.240 --> 01:44:27.840]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests
[01:44:27.840 --> 01:44:32.640]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust
[01:44:32.640 --> 01:44:38.800]  young Jevity so much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs,
[01:44:38.800 --> 01:44:44.800]  and many others. When you order from Logos Radio Network.com, your health will improve
[01:44:44.800 --> 01:44:50.160]  as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity,
[01:44:50.160 --> 01:44:55.200]  you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:44:55.200 --> 01:44:59.680]  help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:03.200 --> 01:45:08.080]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[01:45:08.080 --> 01:45:14.080]  with Jurisdictionary. The affordable, easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you
[01:45:14.080 --> 01:45:21.280]  how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:21.280 --> 01:45:24.480]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:25.280 --> 01:45:31.680]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[01:45:31.680 --> 01:45:37.680]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a
[01:45:37.680 --> 01:45:43.120]  lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[01:45:43.120 --> 01:45:48.880]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[01:45:48.880 --> 01:45:55.200]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit
[01:45:55.200 --> 01:46:13.680]  ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:25.200 --> 01:46:50.640]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[01:46:50.640 --> 01:47:00.800]  and we're going to try our 716 number again. If you are in New York, if you have a 716 area code,
[01:47:03.280 --> 01:47:14.720]  talk to us. I guess we still don't have that particular line. Okay, now we're going to
[01:47:14.720 --> 01:47:21.360]  Irvin in Nevada. Hello, Irvin. What do you have for us today?
[01:47:21.360 --> 01:47:28.320]  Okay, but just a bit of good news. I was working with an older gentleman in Massachusetts
[01:47:28.320 --> 01:47:34.000]  who had a foreclosure date set, I think, early, originally January 4th, and then the
[01:47:35.120 --> 01:47:40.720]  files and stuff, plus the moratorium in the state of Massachusetts, and it was supposed to,
[01:47:40.720 --> 01:47:48.400]  I think, end on the 24th, of course, next week, but he contacted me and said that they canceled it,
[01:47:48.400 --> 01:47:52.640]  so that was some good news. In that case, it's one of these things where they have
[01:47:52.640 --> 01:47:59.440]  a place with a lot of names. There's Mr. Cooper, but it used to be Nation Star,
[01:47:59.440 --> 01:48:00.880]  and they tried to get it all friendly.
[01:48:00.880 --> 01:48:11.360]  Wait, did I lose you? I think you may have hit his mute button or something.
[01:48:14.640 --> 01:48:18.320]  Irvin, you still there? Maybe hit the mute button with your cheek or something.
[01:48:21.200 --> 01:48:24.400]  Can you hear me? No, we got you back.
[01:48:24.400 --> 01:48:32.000]  Oh, sorry. There he is.
[01:48:33.120 --> 01:48:35.840]  Can you hear me? Yes, we can.
[01:48:36.960 --> 01:48:39.440]  Keep talking. It seemed like you were cutting out.
[01:48:40.320 --> 01:48:43.760]  I'm sorry. Yeah, I think I made a brush the stupid button on that sheet.
[01:48:43.760 --> 01:48:50.400]  Anyway, bottom line was that it caused trouble with the foreclosure. I don't want to get cut off,
[01:48:50.400 --> 01:48:54.880]  but I was saying that this is one of those things where it's like sending a new guy in the game
[01:48:54.880 --> 01:48:59.200]  and try to go out and give it to his hot player, because he's been approached by Nation Star mortgage,
[01:48:59.840 --> 01:49:10.640]  Mr. Cooper, PHH, and Mr. Rez. New Rez, New Rez. As I said, none of them had a claim,
[01:49:10.640 --> 01:49:15.760]  but at least they postponed the foreclosure. Also, one of the contact you may need to remind
[01:49:15.760 --> 01:49:21.360]  you to give me a call about who you discussed a few days ago, that program, because I'm definitely
[01:49:21.360 --> 01:49:30.480]  interested. It seems that your letter to the criminal charges to the governors definitely
[01:49:30.480 --> 01:49:35.840]  had an effect with other governors. These things are being dropped in other states as well, so
[01:49:37.280 --> 01:49:42.880]  like Alfon said, the power that just one man can have, that definitely, I don't believe
[01:49:42.880 --> 01:49:47.680]  the coincidence, not that one, that you sent him a criminal charge, it got placed in front of the,
[01:49:47.680 --> 01:49:53.760]  I guess, the grand jury, and all of a sudden, quite changed in attitude. That's tremendous.
[01:49:55.120 --> 01:50:04.800]  Purely coincidental. Of course. Oh, there's criminal charges against me? Oh my. Well,
[01:50:04.800 --> 01:50:15.600]  he knows about it, because I sent the complaint to him. I have something I've been working on for
[01:50:15.600 --> 01:50:22.720]  a very long time, and that's an examining trial, and I used the governor. Is the governor,
[01:50:22.720 --> 01:50:28.720]  is that the changes of the judge or something? Yeah, I've used the governor to make my point.
[01:50:28.720 --> 01:50:36.400]  I filed against the governor with the Chief Justice of the Supreme. Now, I filed against him
[01:50:36.400 --> 01:50:44.400]  with the governor, with the Travis County District Attorney on October 8th. On October 9th, I filed
[01:50:44.400 --> 01:50:50.800]  the complaint with the Chief Justice of the Supreme. The reason I did that is, is if you are
[01:50:50.800 --> 01:50:58.960]  if you are indicted in Texas, and you've never been arrested, the indictment cannot be filed with
[01:50:58.960 --> 01:51:07.520]  the clerk until the person's been arrested. So, if the grand jury brings a two-vill, and the person
[01:51:07.520 --> 01:51:16.560]  hasn't been arrested under 2022 of the old designation, I think it's 20A22 now. Is that
[01:51:16.560 --> 01:51:24.160]  right breeder? Did they change that number? Anyway, last one in 20A of Texas Code of Criminal
[01:51:24.160 --> 01:51:33.040]  Procedure, the last one says that if the accused has not been arrested, then the clerk cannot make
[01:51:33.040 --> 01:51:42.320]  notes in the minutes of the court. Let me step back one step. The second to the last one, it used
[01:51:42.320 --> 01:51:51.280]  to be 2021, said that after the grand jury is voted, they will come before the court or the clerk
[01:51:52.160 --> 01:52:02.560]  with a quorum of the grand jury present, and the foreman shall give notice of all two bills.
[01:52:02.560 --> 01:52:15.040]  And the clerk shall make notes in the minutes of the court. 2021 says, 2022 says, if the person
[01:52:15.040 --> 01:52:22.160]  hasn't been arrested, then the clerk must issue a capious warrant for the person's arrest. Once
[01:52:22.160 --> 01:52:28.720]  they've been arrested, then the clerk can enter the two bill into the records of the court.
[01:52:28.720 --> 01:52:38.800]  So, the reason for that is, is when you are arrested, the law commands that you be taken
[01:52:38.800 --> 01:52:45.280]  directly to the nearest magistrate, and an examining trial is to be held. At an examining
[01:52:45.280 --> 01:52:52.960]  trial under Chapter 16, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, first thing before any evidence is
[01:52:52.960 --> 01:52:59.520]  presented against the accused, the accused is given opportunity to give a statement to the court.
[01:53:01.120 --> 01:53:08.000]  You get to the magistrate, you get the opportunity to enter expulatory evidence.
[01:53:08.960 --> 01:53:15.200]  So, when the Chief Justice of the Supreme refused to hold an examining trial for the governor,
[01:53:16.160 --> 01:53:20.720]  I filed against the Chief Justice with the presiding judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals,
[01:53:20.720 --> 01:53:27.680]  claiming that the Chief Justice denied the governor due process by failing to hold an
[01:53:27.680 --> 01:53:32.800]  examining trial so that he was unable to enter expulatory evidence in his defense.
[01:53:33.760 --> 01:53:40.000]  Now the grand jury only sees my complaint against him and no expulatory evidence.
[01:53:41.440 --> 01:53:48.560]  I sent, I sent notice to the governor that the Chief Justice of the Supreme denied him due process.
[01:53:48.560 --> 01:53:55.440]  Because I filed this complaint with him, have a look at this, this is a complaint I filed.
[01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:00.960]  Now you're going to have to go before the grand jury and the grand jury will not have
[01:54:00.960 --> 01:54:05.760]  any expulatory evidence because the Chief Justice denied you opportunity to present it.
[01:54:08.240 --> 01:54:09.840]  That conniving or what?
[01:54:09.840 --> 01:54:23.920]  Oh no, this is, no, no, we're not talking bill of attainer here.
[01:54:24.880 --> 01:54:26.960]  No, no, the capious as well, you mentioned the capious.
[01:54:27.520 --> 01:54:35.280]  Well, the capious is just, a capious is a warrant that's issued by the court
[01:54:35.280 --> 01:54:39.760]  and not by the magistrate.
[01:54:44.480 --> 01:54:50.560]  Brett, can you explain the, I can't explain the exact difference between it.
[01:54:50.560 --> 01:54:57.760]  It's not capious, profan, in the statute is just called a capious warrant.
[01:54:58.320 --> 01:55:03.680]  Can you explain the difference between a capious warrant and a regular arrest warrant?
[01:55:03.680 --> 01:55:06.160]  Brett? No, I'm not really familiar with the capious.
[01:55:06.960 --> 01:55:10.480]  Only the capious, profan, and the regular ones.
[01:55:11.920 --> 01:55:16.080]  Yeah, well, I've seen capious and it's one of the things I never looked up,
[01:55:16.880 --> 01:55:21.040]  but it's essentially a warrant issued by a court.
[01:55:22.320 --> 01:55:22.640]  Right.
[01:55:24.640 --> 01:55:29.840]  Well, so did the governor avail himself of his rights and say, we got to meet this
[01:55:29.840 --> 01:55:36.480]  person? He couldn't because the chief justice refused to hold an assembly trial.
[01:55:36.480 --> 01:55:42.560]  So I asked the presiding judge of the court of criminal appeals in Texas, we have two high courts,
[01:55:43.920 --> 01:55:48.960]  one for civil supreme and the other for criminal court of criminal appeals.
[01:55:50.160 --> 01:55:53.200]  They're actually both in the same building right across hall from each other.
[01:55:53.200 --> 01:56:01.760]  So I asked the presiding judge of the court of criminal appeals to hold an examining trial
[01:56:03.040 --> 01:56:07.600]  on the chief justice of the supreme for proficient misconduct.
[01:56:09.440 --> 01:56:14.960]  And you would have thought she would have considered this very carefully because in 2008,
[01:56:15.520 --> 01:56:21.680]  I put her in front of a grand jury, the whole court of criminal appeals in front of a grand jury,
[01:56:21.680 --> 01:56:27.840]  and the grand jury got the complaint on their first day in office and held it to their last day in
[01:56:27.840 --> 01:56:33.520]  office. And she had no opportunity to enter exculpatory evidence.
[01:56:35.200 --> 01:56:46.000]  So they had my 119 page criminal complaint and the grand jury had it, but the court of
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:52.080]  criminal appeals could not enter exculpatory evidence. They couldn't explain their position.
[01:56:52.080 --> 01:56:58.720]  They just had the hope that the grand jury did not choose to indict them. They had a
[01:56:58.720 --> 01:57:04.640]  prosecutor who was a 25 year Democrat retiring and they're all Republicans.
[01:57:05.680 --> 01:57:11.440]  That 30 rotten scoundrel used my complaint to try to take out all those judges with him.
[01:57:11.440 --> 01:57:16.320]  And they knew that. So he's trying to get him indicted.
[01:57:17.600 --> 01:57:22.080]  They ain't doing anything about it. They had to sit there for three months wondering if their
[01:57:22.080 --> 01:57:28.800]  career was going to end. I would have thought she would have taken that into consideration,
[01:57:28.800 --> 01:57:33.840]  but now she's going back in front of a grand jury for not doing her job.
[01:57:33.840 --> 01:57:43.200]  But the whole point of this is to bring the point to the courts. The purpose of a grand jury is to
[01:57:43.200 --> 01:57:49.280]  give the accused opportunity to enter exculpatory evidence. And this helps everyone in the process.
[01:57:51.040 --> 01:57:58.640]  Sometimes the guy'll tell on himself. Other times he will enter information that will
[01:57:58.640 --> 01:58:04.240]  cause the magistrate to say, what the heck's going on here, Mr. Police Officer? You don't have
[01:58:04.240 --> 01:58:12.480]  probable cause. And would eliminate that from the court docket. And ease the burden on the courts.
[01:58:12.480 --> 01:58:18.720]  Everybody wins by this. So I had to use this dirty trick to get it there. I am sorry. You
[01:58:18.720 --> 01:58:25.120]  stepped your whole time. But I was enjoying this way too much. If you will call me tomorrow,
[01:58:25.120 --> 01:58:31.200]  I would like to talk to you. I have the traffic ticket site up with all the login page and got
[01:58:31.200 --> 01:58:36.320]  all that cool stuff working. And now I'm ready to start upgrading all the documentation.
[01:58:37.040 --> 01:58:43.360]  Thank you all for listening. We'll be back next week. Same time, same station. Make sure you listen.
[01:58:44.560 --> 01:58:45.200]  And good night.
[01:58:45.200 --> 01:58:56.160]  Bible's For America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New
[01:58:56.160 --> 01:59:01.680]  Testament Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that
[01:59:01.680 --> 01:59:08.240]  explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.240 --> 01:59:15.040]  Order your free copy today from Bible's For America. Call us toll free at 888-551
[01:59:15.040 --> 01:59:23.200]  0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes
[01:59:23.200 --> 01:59:29.520]  with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the
[01:59:29.520 --> 01:59:35.360]  Bible. This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery
[01:59:35.360 --> 01:59:49.040]  Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.