ROL_2021-02-26_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.440]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, brand crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.840]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, bitcoin, core $10,566.52, ethereum $221.00
[00:29.840 --> 00:41.440]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, white coin $100.31, and bitcoin cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:45.920 --> 00:52.400]  Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:58.080]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing 10
[00:58.080 --> 01:00.240]  and entering 40 today in history.
[01:04.480 --> 01:09.760]  And recent news since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven attacks
[01:09.760 --> 01:14.880]  his law back in June county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, San Antonio
[01:14.880 --> 01:18.720]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones
[01:18.720 --> 01:23.200]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the
[01:23.200 --> 01:28.240]  herb for THC. Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this month
[01:28.240 --> 01:33.440]  that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:33.440 --> 01:37.840]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter to
[01:37.840 --> 01:42.800]  county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas
[01:42.800 --> 01:49.600]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as well as other cities too
[01:49.600 --> 01:56.080]  like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza a Democrat who also stated earlier this month
[01:56.080 --> 02:01.760]  that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.760 --> 02:06.720]  However the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball an assistant public defender
[02:06.720 --> 02:11.200]  in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[02:11.200 --> 02:15.920]  illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something
[02:15.920 --> 02:24.960]  the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five
[02:24.960 --> 02:30.640]  and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico the specimen
[02:30.640 --> 02:36.160]  being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way
[02:36.160 --> 02:41.760]  back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper the shark secretes a
[02:41.760 --> 02:48.880]  luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and pray
[02:48.880 --> 03:12.000]  who may be drawn into the glow. This was Luke Brody with your lowdown for July 22nd 2019.
[03:18.880 --> 03:27.440]  Today came in the rocks just like they say I accepted it for value right away.
[03:29.600 --> 03:40.480]  Not later we are originators and the pathways seem to get straighter every day and I can take
[03:40.480 --> 03:51.040]  anything that belongs to me and put it to good use. What I was good for began to go where could I go.
[03:53.040 --> 04:00.240]  Okay we are back in Shelton, Brett Mountain, Rula Rula Real and we're talking to Patty and Patty
[04:00.240 --> 04:07.760]  I know that I've fed you a whole bunch of information and I will be frank I was really
[04:07.760 --> 04:14.880]  talking to my audience this is not something I address often it's been a while since I
[04:14.880 --> 04:20.720]  addressed it so I used your issue as an opportunity to give out a bunch of information.
[04:21.920 --> 04:29.360]  I don't expect you to remember all of this but I hope that we've given you enough that you know
[04:29.360 --> 04:38.320]  you got lots of things you can do. Yes sir I do and thank you so much you and Brett.
[04:41.120 --> 04:50.960]  Okay well after the show can you send me an email to randy at ruleoflawradio.com
[04:52.720 --> 04:57.120]  and I will send you a list of what all I need you to try to find for me
[04:57.120 --> 05:02.880]  and I'll put you together a bunch of claims that you can bring against them
[05:04.400 --> 05:11.440]  and then I need to assess what the situation is we'll look at how they respond to you
[05:12.160 --> 05:18.880]  and if they have if I get the impression that they sold your mortgage multiple times and they
[05:18.880 --> 05:32.080]  need to foreclose in order to cover their fraud then we'll work out a way to handle that.
[05:33.920 --> 05:41.120]  Well I don't know if I can find all of the back paperwork because before my mom really
[05:41.120 --> 05:46.880]  got sick she started shredding a bunch of stuff and I'm afraid some of that was
[05:46.880 --> 06:00.640]  the mortgage stuff. Do you know how long ago this home equity loan occurred? How old is it?
[06:02.560 --> 06:06.320]  Um well I think she got two of them.
[06:09.520 --> 06:11.040]  Okay what about the latest one?
[06:11.040 --> 06:23.920]  Well they were combined as one so I guess the country wider the first mortgage company
[06:25.440 --> 06:34.640]  that she had they merged the two together or she went down there and whatever.
[06:34.640 --> 06:41.680]  I know she's putting on those papers but anything else? No the latest one's all we need.
[06:44.320 --> 06:49.200]  The latest one? Was that 2004? SPS. Pardon me?
[06:51.600 --> 06:56.720]  I was just asking is that 2004? Possibly.
[06:56.720 --> 07:07.600]  Okay there's a almost certainly the title company will have those records
[07:07.600 --> 07:12.320]  and they can provide them on CD. Okay.
[07:14.720 --> 07:18.000]  And if the title company tries to give you any problem we'll send them a
[07:18.640 --> 07:22.560]  pre-litigation discovery request that'll jerk a knot in their shorts.
[07:22.560 --> 07:32.560]  Okay. Okay then send me that email and then we'll talk.
[07:34.400 --> 07:43.920]  Okay. Thank you for calling. Thank you. Okay now Tina do you have anything else for us?
[07:44.800 --> 07:50.160]  No no I'm going to let you go to others. Thank you. I'll keep me in there. Thank you.
[07:50.160 --> 07:58.080]  For your input on that to kind of help when Patty was you were you were describing some of the
[07:58.080 --> 08:01.760]  same things that you'd been through and thank you for that input that really helps to
[08:02.320 --> 08:05.280]  set somebody at ease when they're not sure about any of this stuff.
[08:07.600 --> 08:15.360]  Okay she's dropped off. Okay now we're going to go to Danny in Tennessee. Hello Danny.
[08:15.360 --> 08:23.840]  Hey how are you tonight? I'm good. What do you have for us?
[08:24.880 --> 08:30.800]  Well I got a few different little things but one kind of related to your thing about
[08:31.840 --> 08:36.960]  you know getting arrested and dragged off the jail before you see magistrate
[08:36.960 --> 08:46.400]  and I was thinking that whenever they first try to have that at first hearing not one where
[08:46.400 --> 08:52.480]  you really get to acquire anything but but the magistrate just shows up basically reads the
[08:52.480 --> 08:58.880]  charges and things and finds that you know probable cause at that point or whatever he's doing.
[08:58.880 --> 09:07.760]  I think it'd be this way in Texas but it is this way in Tennessee that supposed to be taken
[09:07.760 --> 09:14.960]  for the magistrate before you're imprisoned and so whenever you first try to start that
[09:15.920 --> 09:24.480]  little hearing you object to it for being out of order because it's supposed to happen before
[09:24.480 --> 09:33.120]  you were there in jail and now they're coming in there and you know doing you know the
[09:33.120 --> 09:41.280]  magistration not what they're really supposed to do. Well in Tennessee they have magistrates
[09:41.280 --> 09:52.000]  appointed specifically for that purpose and I'm not as sure about the specifics of Tennessee law
[09:52.000 --> 09:59.520]  law. Texas law and case law says directly to the nearest magistrate by the most direct route.
[10:02.160 --> 10:12.240]  If there is a magistrate at the jail for the purpose of holding an examining trial
[10:12.240 --> 10:25.760]  then the bringing of the accused to the jail is not inappropriate unless they book them into the
[10:25.760 --> 10:34.480]  jail first. Well yeah that's what they've been doing and then you know you get something before
[10:34.480 --> 10:44.160]  a magistrate like the next morning or maybe up to nearly 48 hours later. What does the code say
[10:45.600 --> 10:51.520]  about what must happen in an examining trial in Tennessee? Well it doesn't say
[10:53.440 --> 11:01.200]  that well where you put that I'm not quite sure. Okay step back let me let me explain why I said that
[11:01.200 --> 11:10.720]  that in Texas chapter 16 at an examining trial before any evidence is entered against the accused
[11:10.720 --> 11:20.320]  the magistrate must give the accused all of his statutory warnings and the accused is to be given
[11:20.320 --> 11:26.640]  an opportunity to enter a statement into the record before anything's put in against him.
[11:26.640 --> 11:36.400]  Are there some are procedures and it goes on of several different things they have to do
[11:37.040 --> 11:43.440]  are there is there any code explaining at an examining trial these steps must happen?
[11:45.200 --> 11:51.040]  Yeah some similar things they do go through reading you know the rights that you supposed to have
[11:51.040 --> 11:59.040]  and everything but you know you may be sitting in jail and looking at a screen where he's across
[11:59.040 --> 12:06.160]  town in the courtroom you know. Is the officer also there?
[12:06.160 --> 12:22.000]  Do I lose you Danny? Yes I did. Danny just dropped off. Okay let me give him a second to call back
[12:23.600 --> 12:31.680]  if the reason I asked that question to Danny if the officer is not there then the officer
[12:31.680 --> 12:37.520]  says there's nobody there to testify against you and there's nobody to cross-examine. Right you
[12:37.520 --> 12:42.880]  have to be able to cross-examine your accuser in front of the magistrate. Yes okay Danny you're back?
[12:44.160 --> 12:56.640]  Yeah okay what I was asking when they have this video hearing is the officer included in the
[12:56.640 --> 13:06.080]  conference call? No. Then it's not an examining trial. Right to do a preliminary hearing maybe
[13:06.080 --> 13:19.360]  months later. Okay that's what a preliminary hearing is what uh Gerstein Pugh requires
[13:19.360 --> 13:30.240]  immediately not months later. Yeah okay in Texas 16.17 and this one's critical says that after the
[13:31.680 --> 13:40.560]  hearing the judge is to render a ruling stating whether he released the person at the liberty
[13:41.280 --> 13:46.880]  bound him to the court on and set bail released him on bail or remanded him to the jail
[13:46.880 --> 13:56.720]  and he needs to under 1730 17.30 he is required to seal all documents head in the hearing cause
[13:56.720 --> 14:01.200]  his name to be written across the seal of the envelope and forward it to the clerk in the
[14:01.200 --> 14:08.320]  court of jurisdiction so that that order finding probable cause goes to the court of jurisdiction.
[14:09.040 --> 14:16.480]  Is anything like that in Tennessee law? Yeah well this is more from you know seeing
[14:16.480 --> 14:23.040]  what I said than remembering what I've read about it but you know if they do a finding a
[14:23.040 --> 14:30.080]  probable cause then they you know forward all this to uh grand jury. Okay then
[14:32.320 --> 14:42.160]  is if there is no copy of that finding in the record then all the any time that you have been
[14:42.160 --> 14:51.440]  held or bound to the court is illegal just holding a hearing months later uh if the judge finds no
[14:51.440 --> 14:58.160]  probable cause then you've been subject to false imprisonment all this time. Yeah.
[15:00.560 --> 15:08.000]  So the order the finding that the judge is supposed to produce this is it sounds like it's the same
[15:08.000 --> 15:18.160]  in Texas a criminal complaint by a police officer or a citizen or anyone is sufficient to give a
[15:18.160 --> 15:25.440]  magistrate a jurisdiction to hold an examining trial or preliminary hearing.
[15:27.760 --> 15:34.560]  Once the judge makes a finding of probable cause then he forwards that finding to the
[15:34.560 --> 15:41.840]  court of original jurisdiction and that moves jurisdiction from the magistrate to the court
[15:41.840 --> 15:47.200]  if the magistrate does not find probable cause jurisdiction ends right there.
[15:49.600 --> 15:55.520]  So finding you to the court for months before they have a preliminary hearing
[15:56.960 --> 15:59.760]  the court has no jurisdiction in the interim.
[15:59.760 --> 16:04.880]  So finding a probable cause it gives the court jurisdiction.
[16:06.160 --> 16:10.640]  They have to do that within 48 hours. You're not really going to the court you're just going
[16:10.640 --> 16:18.800]  back to the magistrates court. Even so uh you're bound to the court. How do they put how do they
[16:18.800 --> 16:26.640]  hold you on bail? How do they hold up any kind of uh like a random hearing? Well if it's not a
[16:26.640 --> 16:33.120]  big kind of thing they they just sort of have a schedule of things for different kinds of
[16:33.120 --> 16:40.480]  offenses and uh you can get a bondsman or maybe pay it yourself. Yeah but how do you do that when
[16:40.480 --> 16:45.760]  you've never never found probable cause? They don't have any jurisdiction. Hang on,
[16:45.760 --> 16:52.480]  about to go to the sponsors. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rural Law Radio. I call in number 512
[16:52.480 --> 16:56.960]  646 1984. We'll be right back.
[17:22.800 --> 17:27.760]  Mail or court summons. How to answer letters and phone calls. How to get debt collectors out of
[17:27.760 --> 17:33.520]  your credit reports. How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.520 --> 17:38.880]  The Michael Miris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[17:38.880 --> 17:44.240]  consultation is available as well. For more information please visit RuralLawRadio.com
[17:44.240 --> 17:51.600]  and click on the blue Michael Miris banner or email Michael Miris at yahoo.com. That's RuralLawRadio.com
[17:51.600 --> 17:59.440]  or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[18:01.520 --> 18:05.920]  Rural Law Radio is proud to offer the Rural Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America we live in
[18:05.920 --> 18:09.680]  and us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're
[18:09.680 --> 18:14.080]  going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely
[18:14.080 --> 18:17.840]  from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right
[18:17.840 --> 18:22.480]  to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to
[18:22.480 --> 18:26.720]  enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Dave Craig in
[18:26.720 --> 18:30.560]  conjunction with Rural Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[18:30.560 --> 18:34.800]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[18:34.800 --> 18:38.880]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuralLawRadio.com and
[18:38.880 --> 18:43.200]  ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation
[18:43.200 --> 18:48.080]  Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research
[18:48.080 --> 18:51.520]  documents and further useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the
[18:51.520 --> 18:56.160]  help of this material from RuralLawRadio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have
[18:56.160 --> 19:00.480]  free society we all want and deserve.
[19:00.480 --> 19:08.480]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:30.480 --> 19:40.480]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[20:00.480 --> 20:08.480]  We are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rural Law Radio and we're talking to Danny in Tennessee.
[20:08.480 --> 20:14.480]  If you have trouble understanding this, it's because we're speaking a foreign dialect.
[20:14.480 --> 20:20.480]  We're speaking Hillbilly because he's in Tennessee and we're not speaking Redneck from Texas.
[20:20.480 --> 20:28.480]  You didn't know I was multilingual. How about that? You're full of surprises.
[20:30.800 --> 20:37.120]  I'm actually from Tennessee so actually I'm from about 60 miles before Danny's at right now.
[20:38.480 --> 20:41.520]  I just passed through Jackson last Saturday, Danny.
[20:42.880 --> 20:47.440]  Why didn't you let me know? I was with my daughter and my grandson and
[20:47.440 --> 20:57.040]  we were in her Porsche. I really don't like how a Porsche drives. I guess I'm too old,
[20:57.040 --> 21:04.400]  I don't like sports cars but it's got high mileage tires on them and I got stuck in my mother's
[21:04.400 --> 21:12.720]  driveway. I'm out there with a rake because I don't have a snow shovel raking this snow out from under
[21:12.720 --> 21:20.640]  the tires and this is why I moved to Texas to get away from that stuff. Anyway, okay, we were
[21:20.640 --> 21:27.840]  talking about the examining trial or preliminary hearing. I think Texas is the only state that
[21:27.840 --> 21:34.160]  calls it an examining trial. Every other state I've looked at called it a preliminary hearing and
[21:34.160 --> 21:44.560]  that's what Gerstein Pew, the primary controlling case, calls it. So the question is, how did the
[21:44.560 --> 21:51.840]  court ever get subject matter jurisdiction before the preliminary hearing? Okay, you said they
[21:51.840 --> 22:00.080]  hold it a couple months later. Does the court do anything in between? Not really. I think they
[22:00.080 --> 22:07.600]  gave you opportunity to take care of whatever your problem was if it was transportation,
[22:08.320 --> 22:15.600]  violation, or charging and you might be able to bring it in and get it all settled ahead of time.
[22:16.560 --> 22:21.600]  In other words, pay. Otherwise, not really. Okay, well, there's nothing to settle?
[22:23.920 --> 22:29.280]  Well, if they say they had expired registration or something else, go fix those defects that
[22:29.280 --> 22:39.840]  they found. No, they don't have jurisdiction to determine that you fixed the defect. They don't
[22:39.840 --> 22:44.560]  have the power to do anything until they have jurisdiction.
[22:49.760 --> 22:56.960]  This is okay. If it's not where you fix something, do they also call you in for a
[22:56.960 --> 23:05.120]  let's make a deal hearing? Yeah, they kind of do that. I mean, I can't remember the
[23:05.120 --> 23:11.360]  sequence now. It's been a while for me, but yeah, if I do work on that, that's part of what I'm
[23:11.360 --> 23:17.680]  talking about, getting things settled. Okay, they cannot do any of that.
[23:17.680 --> 23:27.680]  Do they call you up and say, hey, you know, we'd like you to have a meeting down here. We'd
[23:27.680 --> 23:31.760]  like you to come down and talk to us. They do that or they'd send you an order to appear?
[23:33.040 --> 23:40.960]  Oh, no, it's not an order to appear. You get your appearance time. Well, let's say if you're in jail,
[23:40.960 --> 23:49.200]  you get out and they give you a time to show up where he read you, write you health and write to
[23:49.200 --> 23:56.080]  lawyer and all those things. And then maybe you can do a little something to get it all done with.
[23:56.080 --> 24:01.120]  But if you don't, then they go schedule the preliminary hearing.
[24:01.120 --> 24:15.120]  Okay, here's the problem. They have no power to have you come in and tell them what you're
[24:15.120 --> 24:24.480]  talking about is an arraignment. They identify you take a plea. Oh, they can't hold the court
[24:24.480 --> 24:32.000]  can hold an arraignment. But the court doesn't have jurisdiction yet. Well, after the
[24:33.680 --> 24:39.440]  indictment, they do have an arraignment in the trial court. Yeah, well, whatever they have
[24:40.000 --> 24:49.760]  before the preliminary hearing, they don't have authority to do. If you're taken before
[24:49.760 --> 25:00.000]  and magistrate in the jail, and that magistrate just sets bond, they don't have authority to do that.
[25:02.960 --> 25:07.520]  They can't set bond until they have a determination of probable cause.
[25:09.280 --> 25:18.240]  Well, if you could be in jail and get out on bond before you have that first time before any
[25:18.240 --> 25:26.640]  magistrate by a schedule of bond amounts they have for particular charges and things.
[25:26.640 --> 25:33.680]  Yeah, that's policy. I get policy. I get it that they do that, but that don't make it legal.
[25:36.720 --> 25:44.960]  Who sets bond? How do you set bond against someone who there's never been a determination
[25:44.960 --> 25:52.960]  of probable cause? Well, what if the magistrate says, well, there's no probable cause and you
[25:52.960 --> 26:01.600]  released? The only thing that gives them subject manager jurisdiction is determination of probable
[26:01.600 --> 26:09.760]  cause. So they set bond and bind you to bond, bind you at your liberty until they get around
[26:09.760 --> 26:23.200]  to holding an examining trial. That's unconstitutional. Johnson v. State speaks to the
[26:24.000 --> 26:31.520]  devastating effect of being jerked out of an orderly life and thrown into jail even if you're
[26:31.520 --> 26:40.080]  just it actually went to a terrorist stop. Even if it's just for a brief amount of time to the
[26:40.080 --> 26:49.680]  average person, it's a very frightening and debilitating experience. And this is an argument
[26:49.680 --> 26:54.880]  on subject manager jurisdiction. They have to have the power to do what they're doing.
[26:54.880 --> 27:04.160]  And they don't. They do the same thing here. Actually, I'm the county I'm in. They never
[27:04.160 --> 27:16.080]  have an examining trial. Prosecuting attorney told me in a response to my request for a 16-17 order
[27:16.800 --> 27:20.320]  that as long as he's been a prosecutor, they've never had an examining trial.
[27:20.320 --> 27:35.600]  Holy mackerel. So all of their prosecutions are illegal. In Tennessee, the pre preliminary
[27:35.600 --> 27:42.880]  hearing detention is illegal or restriction at your liberty by putting you on bond.
[27:42.880 --> 27:51.600]  Is he legal? You need to challenge that.
[27:56.160 --> 28:03.920]  Yeah. I need to look at your code to see if you have a provision like Texas does
[28:05.040 --> 28:11.760]  that says if they don't have a problem cause determination within 48 hours filed with the
[28:11.760 --> 28:22.400]  clerk, the accused has a right to discharge. You need to see if there's something like that in
[28:22.400 --> 28:34.400]  Tennessee law. Yeah. By the way, how is your case the head against you going? Has that been resolved?
[28:34.400 --> 28:44.160]  Well, still, still, you know, basically, but I'm still looking to find something to do.
[28:44.160 --> 28:46.960]  Oh, okay. So your liberty is not at risk anymore.
[28:49.040 --> 28:54.000]  Well, not, you know, not in general. I keep up with things and show up there every now and then.
[28:54.880 --> 28:57.840]  Good. Good. Good. Good. That's concerned about that.
[28:57.840 --> 29:04.560]  Yes. Okay. Now you go back after them. Yeah, that's what I'm looking to do.
[29:06.400 --> 29:15.120]  Well, that's something you go after them for. Yeah. That pre trial, pre preliminary hearing,
[29:15.120 --> 29:28.000]  the violation of your rights that you were bound to the court for that period of time.
[29:28.000 --> 29:31.840]  That's essentially a new process violation.
[29:36.000 --> 29:38.080]  Okay. Do you have anything else for us, Danny?
[29:39.200 --> 29:42.000]  Yeah, might be one thing as long as we've got the music going.
[29:42.000 --> 29:47.040]  Okay. Well, we'll be back on the other side. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[29:47.040 --> 29:54.480]  we'll have our radio or call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[30:00.720 --> 30:05.600]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might want to know that the way you walk
[30:05.600 --> 30:10.480]  could predict how long you're going to live. I'm Dr. Catherine Albright and I'll be back to tell you
[30:10.480 --> 30:16.720]  more about walking prognostication in just a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you give
[30:16.720 --> 30:21.520]  up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[30:21.520 --> 30:27.440]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance
[30:27.440 --> 30:33.200]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. This public service
[30:33.200 --> 30:38.480]  announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:38.480 --> 30:46.240]  Yahoo and Bing. Start over with start page. New research shows how fast you walk could predict
[30:46.240 --> 30:51.120]  how long you're going to live. The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older
[30:51.120 --> 30:56.800]  adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected. In case you're wondering,
[30:56.800 --> 31:02.320]  one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour. A senior's age, gender and walking
[31:02.320 --> 31:07.200]  speed were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures.
[31:07.200 --> 31:12.880]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer. Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive.
[31:12.880 --> 31:17.680]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes. Researchers say it could help
[31:17.680 --> 31:22.720]  doctors identify older patients who need special care. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[31:22.720 --> 31:25.680]  more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.320 --> 31:36.240]  I lost my son. My nephew. My uncle. My son. On September 11, 2001. Most people don't know that
[31:36.240 --> 31:41.600]  a third tower fell on September 11. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper,
[31:41.600 --> 31:46.560]  was not hit by a plane. Only the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[31:46.560 --> 31:51.760]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to
[31:51.760 --> 31:57.680]  the story. Bring justice to my son. My uncle. My nephew. My son. Go to building what.org.
[31:57.680 --> 32:00.240]  Why it fell. Why it matters. And what you can do.
[32:00.240 --> 32:05.680]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[32:05.680 --> 32:11.920]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8, from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time.
[32:11.920 --> 32:17.680]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 5, 16. Let your light so shine before men that they may
[32:17.680 --> 32:23.600]  see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to reflect God's light and
[32:23.600 --> 32:29.200]  be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse
[32:29.200 --> 32:34.320]  Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:35.040 --> 32:39.680]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss
[32:39.680 --> 32:46.000]  one chapter per week. Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine
[32:46.000 --> 32:51.120]  as well as Christian character development. So mark your calendar and join us live on
[32:51.120 --> 32:58.080]  LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8 for an inspiring and
[32:58.080 --> 33:06.160]  motivating discussion on the Scriptures. Live Free Speech Radio LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:58.080 --> 34:25.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of a Radio,
[34:25.200 --> 34:30.960]  and we're talking to Danny in Tennessee. Okay, Danny, what else do you have for us?
[34:32.720 --> 34:40.240]  Okay, well, I've also been looking to run your routine here the way you do by running a complaint
[34:40.240 --> 34:45.520]  against a public official or somebody from one to another to another until everybody's tangled
[34:45.520 --> 34:54.960]  up with it. But they have some special provisions here that the procedure by criminal complaint
[34:54.960 --> 35:01.760]  is not available for things that would involve official misconduct or official oppression.
[35:02.560 --> 35:07.040]  And so the only thing you're really left with, it looks like, would be to go to the grand jury,
[35:07.040 --> 35:12.800]  which that doesn't sound so bad, but they don't make it, you know, too awfully hard to get there,
[35:12.800 --> 35:18.560]  I think. But when you first get there, you don't get before the whole grand jury date,
[35:18.560 --> 35:25.760]  you get to select a three-person panel that looks at it first and makes some decision about
[35:25.760 --> 35:33.520]  taking it on to the whole body. And one of those is always the foreman. Well, the foreman's a little
[35:33.520 --> 35:40.160]  bit of a problem in that he's not selected from the random jury pool, but especially selected by
[35:40.160 --> 35:49.280]  the judge. And I've heard of cases of some counties having had the same grand jury foreman
[35:49.280 --> 35:56.880]  for 20 years. And so... Is there any provision for challenging a grand juror?
[35:58.640 --> 36:04.320]  Well, I'm not sure about that. I haven't looked at that, you know, at that point when they're already
[36:04.320 --> 36:13.600]  said, I don't know about. Let me make a comment here on that. Yeah, that could be a problem.
[36:14.320 --> 36:20.560]  But when I go after a public official, I never actually want them indicted. So
[36:21.840 --> 36:29.280]  that I wasn't concerned about. When I saw in Tennessee law, it said that you could not file a
[36:29.280 --> 36:36.560]  complaint for official misconduct against the public official with the police department or
[36:36.560 --> 36:45.280]  the clerk or anyone else, that that had to be filed with the grand jury. I wanted to jump up
[36:45.280 --> 36:52.320]  down and clap my hands. You know, I really don't want the grand jury to indict them. You know,
[36:52.320 --> 36:59.120]  the grand jury certainly can. That's their business. But that's not what I want. I want
[36:59.120 --> 37:06.000]  the officer to be terrified that they could get indicted so that they won't ever do this garbage
[37:06.000 --> 37:15.920]  again. And for me, to be able to go directly to the grand jury and make my argument straight to
[37:15.920 --> 37:24.560]  the grand jury, that was wonderful. Okay, well, something else I had an idea about, and this
[37:24.560 --> 37:32.480]  could even be done to the grand jury as well, is in the criminal code here,
[37:35.680 --> 37:42.960]  charge a person, a person commits an offense. So it's by person and included in the persons or
[37:42.960 --> 37:51.120]  corporations, departments, agencies, and other such things. So I had an idea of abstracting this
[37:51.120 --> 37:57.360]  a little bit, you know, because people might not want to actually do something to somebody
[37:58.240 --> 38:05.360]  is to bring the complaint against the department that the guy in there is just animating the
[38:06.880 --> 38:13.600]  policies of that department or that agency. Now, wait a minute, this is a problem. While you have
[38:13.600 --> 38:22.400]  a definition of person that includes illegal fiction, illegal fiction can't commit a crime. Because
[38:22.400 --> 38:33.200]  illegal fishing fiction is not sentient. And a primary condition of crime is men's riots.
[38:33.200 --> 38:40.880]  So you would have to name a human being. You will intend.
[38:45.360 --> 38:50.800]  Does that make sense, Danny? Well, yeah, but I'm just wondering about
[38:51.920 --> 38:54.800]  a person in the criminal code being those things as well.
[38:54.800 --> 39:07.440]  No, the only person that could be charged is the definition of person that goes to a living,
[39:07.440 --> 39:13.200]  breathing human being. That's one of the definitions. Then you've got the legal
[39:13.200 --> 39:21.040]  fictions. The legal fiction can't be charged because they can't have men's race, evil intent.
[39:21.040 --> 39:26.560]  No, that might be. But I've got to kind of look at it again, because we're almost
[39:26.560 --> 39:31.440]  at a place that just says something like a person commits an offense or a person requires
[39:32.160 --> 39:40.080]  this. And I know a person could be a witness or something, but it's stated in the abstraction
[39:40.080 --> 39:48.240]  like that. And it just seems like... Do you know if there's a definition in the
[39:48.240 --> 39:57.360]  penal code or criminal procedure code of person? Well, yeah, that's what I was
[39:57.360 --> 40:05.200]  thinking. It includes these things. No. Was that in the penal or criminal procedure code,
[40:05.200 --> 40:10.960]  or was it somewhere else? Well, I was thinking it was in the penal code, but I have to check
[40:10.960 --> 40:16.640]  make sure it wasn't in the criminal procedure code. It's real important where it's at,
[40:16.640 --> 40:23.760]  because if you have a general definition outside these two codes, and then you have another
[40:23.760 --> 40:30.080]  definition inside these two codes, that definition would take precedent over the general one.
[40:30.640 --> 40:39.360]  And it doesn't seem reasonable that in criminal law, when they speak to person committing crime,
[40:39.360 --> 40:48.240]  that they could in any way intend illegal fiction. Because they can't have men's rights,
[40:48.240 --> 40:57.600]  so it wouldn't be reasonable. Does that make sense? Well, yeah.
[41:01.040 --> 41:07.440]  Yeah, I look into it some more. Yeah, I never want the individual indicted, but I do want
[41:07.440 --> 41:14.720]  to finger point it right at it. When I presented the district attorney in Johnson County to the
[41:14.720 --> 41:23.840]  grand jury, the foreman was furious at me and wanted to know if I had ever been prosecuted
[41:23.840 --> 41:29.520]  by the prosecutor, and I said, absolutely not. I have no access to grind against him,
[41:29.520 --> 41:35.520]  and I don't want him indicted. And he said, well, then why are you here? Because I'm here.
[41:35.520 --> 41:42.480]  And he's out there, wondering if his career is going to end tomorrow. That's all I wanted.
[41:43.680 --> 41:47.440]  You, on the other hand, you have to determine whether or not I've given you sufficient
[41:48.160 --> 41:51.760]  evidence to believe that a crime has been committed and that he committed it.
[41:51.760 --> 41:58.640]  I'm glad I'm not in your shoes. He was not the happy camper, but that was my position.
[41:58.640 --> 42:04.480]  I didn't want him indicted. I didn't want him to do anything that could get him indicted.
[42:06.240 --> 42:12.720]  But the fact that he did, I had a duty to report it. What I really wanted was exactly
[42:12.720 --> 42:20.800]  what I got. If you go to Johnson County, Tennessee, Tennessee, I'm sorry, Johnson County, Texas,
[42:20.800 --> 42:29.920]  and you file a, you make a complaint against the public official. The police are all over that.
[42:31.360 --> 42:37.280]  You won't get any garbage at all. They are on it immediately because prosecutors told them,
[42:37.920 --> 42:45.760]  don't you guys ever give me in this spot again? That's what I wanted. Now, if he gets indicted,
[42:45.760 --> 42:52.320]  you know, that's up to the, to the grand jury and to the courts to prosecute, but it's not what I
[42:52.320 --> 43:02.160]  wanted. Am I making sense, Danny? Yeah. It's about changing the system. If the guy does get indicted,
[43:03.760 --> 43:11.120]  his problem, not my problem, but not my intent. I'm just trying to fix the system.
[43:11.120 --> 43:20.640]  And in Tennessee, I was thrilled that the Tennessee legislature opened the grand jury
[43:20.640 --> 43:28.160]  directly to the public. And I want to model that requirement to see if I can get our legislators
[43:28.160 --> 43:35.200]  here to include that in Texas law. Do you have anything else for us?
[43:35.200 --> 43:40.880]  Uh, well, a little small thing. I think he's playing again.
[43:43.440 --> 43:49.280]  Okay. We'll pick you up on the other side. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rula Radio,
[43:50.000 --> 43:55.920]  a call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[43:55.920 --> 44:06.320]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.320 --> 44:11.120]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.120 --> 44:17.440]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.440 --> 44:22.240]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[44:22.240 --> 44:28.400]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse
[44:28.400 --> 44:34.960]  all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity so much. We became a
[44:34.960 --> 44:40.880]  marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from
[44:40.880 --> 44:48.320]  LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize
[44:48.320 --> 44:53.920]  the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience
[44:53.920 --> 44:59.680]  improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[45:00.960 --> 45:07.360]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.360 --> 45:13.760]  the affordable, easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[45:13.760 --> 45:20.640]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[45:20.640 --> 45:26.480]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now
[45:26.480 --> 45:33.040]  you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[45:33.040 --> 45:38.800]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:38.800 --> 45:44.480]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[45:44.480 --> 45:52.160]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.160 --> 46:11.520]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.960 --> 46:33.360]  Yeah, always I must be careful what I'm wishing for. When I'm hungry, I like to know just what
[46:33.360 --> 46:43.120]  I'm wishing for. I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no-blood. I'm just here making my
[46:43.120 --> 46:54.320]  living, pushing buttons. I get my message, I do anyone in shot and distance. I vote for bravery
[46:54.320 --> 47:02.160]  and I can't slave with showing resistance. First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start
[47:02.160 --> 47:08.960]  strutting, just so black. Okay, we are back. Randy Shelton, Brett Felton, the rule of law radio,
[47:08.960 --> 47:13.840]  and we're talking to Danny in Tennessee and you had one more little thing.
[47:15.440 --> 47:20.720]  Okay, I know before he had things about this COVID stuff and the way things are being done,
[47:21.520 --> 47:28.800]  so I got in some information together about, you know, scientific, published scientific findings
[47:28.800 --> 47:37.040]  about how masks and other such things really don't do anything, and from net to people whenever I
[47:37.040 --> 47:45.760]  could, but also things came up in news recently about like some city councils that went against
[47:46.800 --> 47:55.280]  having a mask mandate. So I put all this together and forwarded it to them, congratulating them
[47:56.320 --> 48:01.600]  for, you know, doing such a good thing and provide them that because you got somebody
[48:01.600 --> 48:08.240]  already doing something, give them some more to work with. And the one this week was,
[48:09.280 --> 48:17.280]  they didn't use a Sarasota, Florida, and so I sent that to everybody on that council there,
[48:17.280 --> 48:26.400]  which was five, and today when I'm wrote back, the vice mayor wrote back thanking me for this.
[48:26.400 --> 48:32.320]  Wonderful. Yeah, so let's pass that on, you know,
[48:33.600 --> 48:37.440]  you know, find somebody else doing something, give them some help.
[48:39.600 --> 48:46.560]  I was talking to Tom Keiley and he was, he does a show on more political issues,
[48:48.080 --> 48:54.640]  and I told him that I'm confident in the American public, if in fact the election
[48:54.640 --> 49:03.760]  was as great a landslide in Trump's favor as it's claimed to be, then the vast majority of
[49:03.760 --> 49:17.600]  the population is behind Trump and or more specifically against Biden. And the power we have
[49:17.600 --> 49:25.520]  is in the states. Most people, we talk about the states, but we really think about states
[49:26.720 --> 49:35.200]  as something like a county in a bigger jurisdiction. We forget that what state means
[49:35.200 --> 49:44.080]  is sovereign nation. We are 50 sovereign nations and we've entered into a compact,
[49:44.080 --> 49:50.560]  we call a federal contract compact, but we're still 50 sovereign nations.
[49:51.440 --> 50:05.520]  Missouri passed a law that eliminated all federal gun rules in this county and they
[50:05.520 --> 50:12.080]  authorized the sheriff to arrest any federal official who came into the county for the purpose
[50:12.080 --> 50:23.040]  of enforcing the gun laws. Now, I wasn't so concerned about that in its context of guns.
[50:24.720 --> 50:31.840]  I was pleased to hear that in the context of the state standing up and telling the federal
[50:31.840 --> 50:40.080]  government to go scratch when the states start closing their borders to the federal government
[50:40.080 --> 50:49.280]  when they tell them to take your funds and keep them and we're not going to pay you anymore
[50:49.280 --> 50:57.520]  funds, then federal government will have no power. All of the Republicans that voted Republicans,
[50:57.520 --> 51:06.240]  if we push our public, our elected officials to go back to being sovereign nation states,
[51:06.240 --> 51:14.880]  we can eliminate the power of the federal government altogether and this wasn't what you
[51:14.880 --> 51:22.800]  just told me indicates that there's a lot of people out there who are unhappy and beginning to pick
[51:22.800 --> 51:29.840]  up the reins and taking the authority they have and telling the federal government they can stick
[51:29.840 --> 51:41.600]  their rules and regulations. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Did I put you to sleep, Danny?
[51:42.560 --> 51:49.600]  No, I'm still here. Oh, okay. Well, is that it, Dan? Yeah, I should take care of everything.
[51:49.600 --> 52:01.760]  Okay, thank you. Now we're going to go to John in New York. Hello, John. Hello, John.
[52:04.800 --> 52:16.000]  Wake up. John has a tendency to goze off. John is a really, really old guy. He is so old. He is
[52:16.000 --> 52:29.360]  almost as old as me. Well, it looks like we don't have John. Oh, man. Waited all this time and any
[52:29.360 --> 52:36.080]  conked out on us. We'll try him a little bit later. Maybe he'll wake back up. Anyway, back to
[52:36.080 --> 52:48.640]  traffic and I got a plan. I have the legal earth project I've been working on these last 15 years.
[52:50.560 --> 52:57.440]  Brett, you mentioned earlier about we wish we had something in place to help people when they
[52:59.120 --> 53:05.280]  we send them in to the courts with some documents and the courts just blows them off and then
[53:05.280 --> 53:09.600]  the courts come back after them and they have no clue what to do.
[53:11.680 --> 53:20.720]  And this is the tool I've been trying to build all these years. And I'm at the point to where I
[53:20.720 --> 53:30.480]  have enough proof of concept in place. I had someone run all of my questions into a
[53:30.480 --> 53:41.920]  linked list type database and it counted 1.5 million questions. So produced a lot of work
[53:41.920 --> 53:47.040]  over these years and got a lot in place now and I have most of my technology in place
[53:48.320 --> 53:52.080]  so that now I can start implementing and I'm going to start it with traffic
[53:52.080 --> 54:01.360]  because traffic is relatively simple compared to safer closure because it's only a minor issue
[54:01.360 --> 54:10.320]  in traffic. But mainly what we're developing is due process. We don't care what you are charged with,
[54:10.320 --> 54:17.360]  it doesn't matter. Because if we address all of the legal issues that are out there,
[54:17.360 --> 54:24.720]  the court will never get to the merits. And just so you know Brett, I just got another
[54:24.720 --> 54:33.040]  threat note from Cumbie, Texas. They're threatening a warrant roundup for a ticket I got in Cumbie,
[54:33.040 --> 54:42.640]  Texas. I drove 600 miles from Tennessee down to Cumbie, Texas to file some motions with the court.
[54:42.640 --> 54:51.360]  They refused to take them because they didn't have a judge at the time. The mayor called
[54:51.360 --> 54:58.560]  the prosecutor and prosecutor refused to accept them. So I drove back. Never have been noticed
[54:58.560 --> 55:07.120]  to appear at court and now I have a warrant roundup warning. I got a couple of calls from a collection
[55:07.120 --> 55:15.360]  law firm. And last time they called me, I told them, don't you dare call me again.
[55:17.600 --> 55:23.120]  Explain to them, I've never been to court, never been summoned to court. I appeared in the court
[55:24.960 --> 55:32.240]  as I had agreed to. And if you call me again, I will barg review into the Stone Age.
[55:32.240 --> 55:42.240]  And I've got any more calls from it. How about that? But anyway, I'm going with, go ahead.
[55:43.120 --> 55:49.200]  I remember with Cumbie, the traffic ticket that I had in Cumbie there for,
[55:52.400 --> 55:56.480]  what do they say, passing in the left lane without passing anybody.
[55:56.480 --> 56:02.000]  When I went around the officer who was stopped in the shoulder at a weird angle.
[56:08.240 --> 56:17.920]  I had some record requests that turned up the basis of their saying that I didn't show up,
[56:17.920 --> 56:23.280]  failure to appear like they're saying for you. I asked for the basis of that. I want to see those
[56:23.280 --> 56:31.760]  records. And it was the most messed up stuff you've seen. It's like cobbled together.
[56:32.560 --> 56:35.520]  Somebody that didn't even know how to use a word processor.
[56:36.800 --> 56:42.160]  And the name at the top didn't match the signature at the bottom. It looks like they tried to
[56:43.280 --> 56:47.200]  move it around and stick somebody else's name in there, but they couldn't quite figure out how
[56:47.200 --> 56:56.720]  you worked their computer. And it was a laughable mess. So you just might find some of that same
[56:56.720 --> 57:03.680]  kind of thing going on with yours. Good, yeah. Finally, this is not the first one of these I've
[57:03.680 --> 57:09.440]  gotten. So I was kind of waiting for them to issue a warrant so I could go down there and
[57:09.440 --> 57:16.800]  they could arrest me. But I got a fight started in the county I live in, so I didn't need to fight.
[57:17.680 --> 57:26.000]  But I am putting the traffic site together and I will use Cumbie as my crash dummy.
[57:28.880 --> 57:36.480]  So back to the traffic site. I've set it up so that in any criminal case,
[57:36.480 --> 57:44.560]  there are certain motions and pleadings that should be filed in order for you to protect all your rights.
[57:46.560 --> 57:52.240]  Because the courts have ruled that rights belong to the belligerent litigants.
[57:54.000 --> 58:01.760]  If you want your rights, you must claim them. And we have a right to go to our sponsors.
[58:01.760 --> 58:08.960]  And if I want that right, I'm going to have to claim it. I've got a minute, so let me beep,
[58:08.960 --> 58:18.960]  John. John, are you awake? Okay, looks like he's not. So we'll go on and talk about what we got
[58:18.960 --> 58:25.040]  coming up. When we come back on the other side, this is Randy Kelfin, Brett Fountain, Roova Radio.
[58:25.040 --> 58:34.080]  I call in number 512-646-1984. We've only got John on the call board, so if you have a question or
[58:34.080 --> 58:39.040]  comment, give us a call. Hang on, we'll be right back.
[58:39.040 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 58:59.600]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.600 --> 59:04.320]  can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study
[59:04.320 --> 59:09.840]  Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.840 --> 59:15.840]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three-volume set called
[59:15.840 --> 59:21.280]  Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[59:21.280 --> 59:28.160]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order
[59:28.160 --> 59:34.800]  your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for
[59:34.800 --> 59:48.960]  America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:48.960 --> 59:58.160]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.480 --> 01:00:04.320]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.240 --> 01:00:12.400]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429
[01:00:12.400 --> 01:00:20.720]  an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.720 --> 01:00:29.040]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.040 --> 01:00:45.200]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:45.840 --> 01:00:52.320]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[01:00:52.320 --> 01:00:57.360]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[01:00:57.360 --> 01:01:00.240]  killing 10 and injuring 40. Today in history.
[01:01:04.400 --> 01:01:09.440]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing HEP into
[01:01:09.440 --> 01:01:14.000]  Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin,
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:22.800]  new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:01:22.800 --> 01:01:28.000]  test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this
[01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:32.880]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:01:32.880 --> 01:01:37.600]  law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:01:37.600 --> 01:01:42.160]  that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in
[01:01:42.160 --> 01:01:48.320]  Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well
[01:01:48.320 --> 01:01:54.880]  as other cities too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also
[01:01:54.880 --> 01:01:59.680]  stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of
[01:01:59.680 --> 01:02:05.040]  marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball,
[01:02:05.040 --> 01:02:09.760]  an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that quote, the law is constantly
[01:02:09.760 --> 01:02:14.160]  changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if
[01:02:14.160 --> 01:02:23.120]  someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by
[01:02:23.120 --> 01:02:28.560]  Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind
[01:02:28.560 --> 01:02:34.640]  in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded
[01:02:34.640 --> 01:02:39.600]  with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the
[01:02:39.600 --> 01:02:45.760]  university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the
[01:02:45.760 --> 01:02:50.400]  purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:50.400 --> 01:03:07.200]  This was Rook Rody with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:20.400 --> 01:03:40.640]  Okay, we are back. We're in the Kelkin Blitt Mountain Rula Radio. And I was going to go
[01:03:40.640 --> 01:03:49.920]  into my traffic stuff, but Dr. Brett on the break and he's been working on barb grievances.
[01:03:49.920 --> 01:03:56.160]  And this is something we haven't talked about in a while. And Brett, will you kind of
[01:03:56.960 --> 01:03:59.440]  go through what we were talking about on the break?
[01:04:01.360 --> 01:04:08.880]  Well, I was just mentioning that in Texas we have rules that, like we were saying earlier,
[01:04:08.880 --> 01:04:14.480]  they're adopted from the model rules, American Bar Association model rules. And every state has
[01:04:14.480 --> 01:04:24.640]  some rules of ethics that lawyers are supposed to follow. This is how specifically does an attorney
[01:04:25.200 --> 01:04:30.640]  act professionally or unprofessionally? How do they act ethically or unethically? It's not
[01:04:30.640 --> 01:04:39.280]  just a fuzzy thing. It's very well detailed. So what I did is I went through in Texas,
[01:04:39.280 --> 01:04:47.600]  it's 118 pages. So I don't know why it has to be that detailed. Should be something so
[01:04:47.600 --> 01:04:54.240]  common sense, right? But I've gone through those 118 pages and I've culled out the
[01:04:55.280 --> 01:05:03.440]  things that seem so common and easy. What do almost all attorneys commonly violate?
[01:05:03.440 --> 01:05:12.640]  They jeopardize their jobs. They jeopardize their whole careers with things that they don't need to
[01:05:12.640 --> 01:05:20.560]  do, but they commonly do. And so I've culled those out and I was thinking it could be kind of
[01:05:20.560 --> 01:05:28.240]  comical, almost amusing to read through these and just note what they are. I know in Texas it'll
[01:05:28.240 --> 01:05:34.080]  be like with the model rules, they adopt them and they just very slightly change something. Here
[01:05:34.080 --> 01:05:40.800]  in there there might be a few words different or they will renumber the rules so that it's
[01:05:40.800 --> 01:05:47.040]  in almost the same place, but you'll find it in different states. It'll be like what's
[01:05:49.520 --> 01:05:57.520]  earlier Tina was mentioning in Rule 8. I think she said 8.4. Well, that's the American Bar
[01:05:57.520 --> 01:06:06.720]  Association model rule. Well, in Texas it's 8.04. So almost no difference there.
[01:06:10.480 --> 01:06:16.800]  Yeah, well you just kind of go down through some of these and you will, no matter what your
[01:06:16.800 --> 01:06:22.240]  interaction with a lawyer is, I'm sure you will easily find something that stands out to you,
[01:06:22.240 --> 01:06:31.360]  hey that's something I can bar grieve him for. What do you say, Randy? Oh, I'm waiting, I'm waiting.
[01:06:33.520 --> 01:06:42.160]  All right, well let's start right here with Rule 1.01A. Shall not accept or continue employment
[01:06:42.160 --> 01:06:47.040]  in a legal matter which the lawyer knows or should know is beyond the lawyer's competence.
[01:06:47.040 --> 01:06:58.160]  Wait a minute, they wouldn't be able to work. So they can't accept employment
[01:06:59.760 --> 01:07:05.040]  if it's beyond their competence and they can't continue employment if it's beyond their competence.
[01:07:06.960 --> 01:07:11.120]  So that could be two different bar grievances right there. Did you accept it?
[01:07:11.120 --> 01:07:19.040]  Did you continue it? That's two potential bar grievances. So then we have 102C
[01:07:20.480 --> 01:07:27.760]  shall not assist or counsel a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or
[01:07:27.760 --> 01:07:37.040]  fraudulent. It's a pretty common one. No, assisting a client or counseling a client to engage in any
[01:07:37.040 --> 01:07:44.320]  conduct the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. Okay, then we have 102D as in Delta, the lawyer
[01:07:44.320 --> 01:07:51.200]  shall promptly make reasonable efforts under the circumstances to dissuade the client from committing
[01:07:51.200 --> 01:07:59.680]  crime or fraud. You notice a pattern here, there's a lot of fraud. Scott mentioned one time Scott
[01:07:59.680 --> 01:08:08.320]  Richardson mentioned that when you're dealing with the insurance for these lawyers, the insurance
[01:08:08.320 --> 01:08:15.040]  people's ears perk up at fraud, waste and abuse. So I said, oh, thanks Scott for that tip and I
[01:08:15.040 --> 01:08:24.000]  paid attention to that while I was culling through these 118 pages and so you'll find a lot of these
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:31.920]  reference fraud, waste and abuse. You bring that up and their insurance premiums go up.
[01:08:33.120 --> 01:08:41.760]  All right, so 1.02E shall make reasonable efforts under the circumstances to persuade the client to
[01:08:41.760 --> 01:08:48.480]  take corrective action when the client has used the lawyer to commit a criminal or fraudulent act.
[01:08:48.480 --> 01:08:54.480]  So this is pretty similar to the D, he had to dissuade the lawyer had to dissuade the client from
[01:08:54.480 --> 01:09:01.840]  the fraud and in E, he had to make reasonable efforts to persuade the client to take corrective
[01:09:01.840 --> 01:09:12.240]  action. So all that's in rule 102, different subsections there. So let's go to rule 104.
[01:09:12.240 --> 01:09:22.960]  A says, shall not enter into an arrangement for charge or collect an illegal fee or unconscionable
[01:09:22.960 --> 01:09:35.360]  fee. What do you think about that Randy? Yeah, explain unconscionable. Outside of what your
[01:09:35.360 --> 01:09:44.720]  conscience would allow. Okay, I have a little bit different one. Unconscionable generally in
[01:09:44.720 --> 01:09:55.440]  law means one party gains and the other party doesn't. A provision in a contract is unconscionable
[01:09:56.080 --> 01:10:01.360]  is where one party is required to do something that the other party gains from,
[01:10:01.360 --> 01:10:11.440]  but the other party doesn't have to reciprocate. That's good. So that's what unconscionable
[01:10:11.440 --> 01:10:20.320]  in law generally means. So the lawyer is not allowed to do that. He can't collect an illegal
[01:10:20.320 --> 01:10:24.080]  fee or an unconscionable fee. Can't bill you for something you didn't do.
[01:10:24.080 --> 01:10:32.560]  And he can't even enter into the arrangement for it. So if he enters into the arrangement,
[01:10:33.280 --> 01:10:40.320]  charges and collects it, well, that's three different bar grievances. Well, that is a
[01:10:40.320 --> 01:10:45.040]  problem because if he enters into a case for the purpose of winning the case,
[01:10:45.040 --> 01:10:54.640]  when have they ever done that and won the case, I mean?
[01:11:00.480 --> 01:11:09.040]  All right. So there's a couple of notes in 104 that are expanding and expanding on the
[01:11:09.040 --> 01:11:17.120]  what does this mean? Unconscionable illegal fee. And they specifically say, kind of what you just
[01:11:17.120 --> 01:11:23.360]  said, that the lawyer should not handle the matter so as to further the lawyer's financial
[01:11:23.360 --> 01:11:32.320]  interest to the detriment of the client. And they further describe that he should not abuse
[01:11:32.320 --> 01:11:40.000]  a fee arrangement based primarily on hourly charges by using wasteful procedures. I hit
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:47.520]  him with this all the time because every time they go and raise some empty argument or go and do a
[01:11:47.520 --> 01:11:52.800]  motion for continuance, trying to push the case out another month or two and make people, you know,
[01:11:52.800 --> 01:12:01.520]  stay in limbo for longer, that's abusing a fee arrangement. They're billing hourly charges and
[01:12:01.520 --> 01:12:08.880]  doing wasteful procedures. So I hit him for that 104. You also hit him for baritry, I take it.
[01:12:09.760 --> 01:12:17.600]  Oh, yeah. Baritry would be, yeah, that's its own fun animal. Fomenting litigation,
[01:12:17.600 --> 01:12:24.320]  where you're in litigation and you do things that increase the cost of litigation,
[01:12:24.320 --> 01:12:34.720]  but does not further the litigation. So that you can bill for that extra cost, that's baritry.
[01:12:38.720 --> 01:12:44.800]  It's a crime. Texas is the only one that makes it, I'm sorry, I heard that New York did,
[01:12:44.800 --> 01:12:48.080]  I think John told me New York did, but never could find it.
[01:12:48.080 --> 01:12:58.240]  But Texas calls it a felony. So they're real serious about it. Okay, I'll show it up now.
[01:13:01.760 --> 01:13:12.400]  All right, let's see. We've got, that was 104. 105 says that there's a duty to not use
[01:13:12.400 --> 01:13:20.640]  false or fabricated evidence. It's just, why do we even have to say this? That's exactly what I
[01:13:20.640 --> 01:13:30.000]  was thinking. Why do we even have to say, I mean, duh. But there is, you have to be specific.
[01:13:30.720 --> 01:13:34.720]  You know, and they say it in several different ways, which means you can bargain from several
[01:13:34.720 --> 01:13:42.400]  times for the same thing. You violated this rule. Oh, you also violated this rule.
[01:13:46.800 --> 01:13:58.320]  All right, so let's see. 201 says that the attorney shall exercise independent
[01:13:58.320 --> 01:14:06.320]  professional judgment and render candid advice. What does that mean?
[01:14:08.640 --> 01:14:12.000]  I mean, he's not allowed to just go along with policy and do things the way that
[01:14:12.800 --> 01:14:17.840]  people told him to do things or the way that people expect him to do things. He needs to
[01:14:17.840 --> 01:14:23.680]  render candid advice. I'm sorry, that's inappropriate. I can't do it your way.
[01:14:23.680 --> 01:14:31.600]  So that means he has to speak with candor to the client as well as the court.
[01:14:32.560 --> 01:14:41.120]  Yes. Yes, I'm referring to a place that he'll get to where you can charge a lawyer for failing to
[01:14:41.120 --> 01:14:46.720]  speak with candor to the court. So this says he has to speak with candor to the client too,
[01:14:46.720 --> 01:14:55.760]  so he can't seem to it. Yes. And 201 says, shall not undertake an evaluation of a matter affecting
[01:14:55.760 --> 01:15:06.960]  a client for the use of someone other than the client. Oh, I have to think about that.
[01:15:09.120 --> 01:15:13.600]  The evaluation of a matter affecting the client for the use of someone other than the client.
[01:15:13.600 --> 01:15:29.200]  All right. So 301 says, hold on, hold on. I'm a defense counsel and I'm bopping the client's
[01:15:29.200 --> 01:15:43.440]  live. So I examine the client to get information to give to the prosecutor to put the client away.
[01:15:44.480 --> 01:15:51.520]  Yeah. Yeah, that could fit as well. I'm trying to, you know, that one took a little bit.
[01:15:52.800 --> 01:15:56.800]  We hear that and most everybody heard that and we think we know exactly what it means,
[01:15:56.800 --> 01:16:04.800]  but I've studied law long enough to realize that you've got to stop and rethink these things and
[01:16:04.800 --> 01:16:09.760]  look at the ramifications and the possibilities to really get it down so you don't miss it.
[01:16:11.040 --> 01:16:14.640]  Am I being pedantic? Sometimes that's good, though.
[01:16:14.640 --> 01:16:25.440]  All right. So 301, rule 301 says, and we're looking at the Texas rules of disciplinary,
[01:16:27.360 --> 01:16:30.240]  Texas disciplinary rules of professional conduct, they call it.
[01:16:34.080 --> 01:16:41.360]  So rule 301 says, shall not bring or defend a proceeding or assert or
[01:16:41.360 --> 01:16:47.920]  controvert an issue therein unless the lawyer reasonably believes that there is a basis for
[01:16:47.920 --> 01:16:54.640]  doing so that's not frivolous. That one fits them hard often. We'll talk about this some more
[01:16:54.640 --> 01:16:57.200]  after we come back from our sponsors. We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.080 --> 01:17:04.560]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.200 --> 01:17:10.800]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris proven method. Michael Mirris has won six cases
[01:17:10.800 --> 01:17:15.600]  in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step
[01:17:15.600 --> 01:17:20.640]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:17:20.640 --> 01:17:26.320]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:17:26.320 --> 01:17:30.960]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them
[01:17:30.960 --> 01:17:36.960]  and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how
[01:17:36.960 --> 01:17:42.000]  to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[01:17:42.000 --> 01:17:47.600]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email Michael
[01:17:47.600 --> 01:17:57.120]  Mirris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:17:57.120 --> 01:18:02.640]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love logos. Without the shows on this network,
[01:18:02.640 --> 01:18:07.040]  I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going
[01:18:07.040 --> 01:18:12.640]  back. I need my truth fix. I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network
[01:18:12.640 --> 01:18:16.800]  on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really
[01:18:16.800 --> 01:18:22.000]  don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:27.040]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:27.040 --> 01:18:32.560]  You're ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to
[01:18:32.560 --> 01:18:39.200]  logosreguletwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from
[01:18:39.200 --> 01:18:45.920]  Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything
[01:18:45.920 --> 01:18:52.720]  different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without doing
[01:18:52.720 --> 01:18:59.440]  anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. Happy holidays,
[01:18:59.440 --> 01:19:25.280]  Logos. This is the Logos Radio Network Network. Oh, come on.
[01:19:29.440 --> 01:19:56.880]  Okay, we are back. This is the rule of law radio. Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain and we are
[01:19:56.880 --> 01:20:05.520]  talking about the rules that attorneys are required to follow. And just like we had a caller earlier
[01:20:05.520 --> 01:20:14.400]  talking about the way these get adopted is from the American Bar Association has these model rules
[01:20:14.400 --> 01:20:21.200]  and different states. Codify those into you must for the different lawyers. When you go to a state
[01:20:21.200 --> 01:20:33.040]  bar exam, you have to demonstrate some certain, they have kind of a low bar, but certain level of
[01:20:33.040 --> 01:20:41.840]  proficiency with these model rules. And any time that the attorney does not follow one of the state
[01:20:41.840 --> 01:20:49.360]  rules that's been codified at the state level, then that's what you're bar grieving him for.
[01:20:49.360 --> 01:20:56.320]  You're not really bar grieving him because he messed up something in your case or he lied,
[01:20:56.320 --> 01:21:05.360]  or you make it go to one of these rules. He violated this rule. It's kind of like a criminal
[01:21:05.360 --> 01:21:14.880]  complaint. Criminal complaint is not just, he hit me. The criminal complaint has to go to an offense.
[01:21:14.880 --> 01:21:21.680]  So you look in the state laws for a criminal offense to find, hey, that's called assault
[01:21:21.680 --> 01:21:29.280]  battery. You find how it fits the facts of your case, fit to that and then you can quote it and
[01:21:29.280 --> 01:21:35.360]  say, this is what that person did. Same thing with this. You're doing a bar grievance and you find
[01:21:35.360 --> 01:21:43.120]  the rule that he violated. He or she. So we're looking here at rule 3.01 and it says that an
[01:21:43.120 --> 01:21:53.840]  attorney shall not bring or defend a proceeding or assert or controvert an issue therein unless
[01:21:53.840 --> 01:21:59.200]  the lawyer reasonably believes that there is a basis for doing so that is not frivolous.
[01:22:00.720 --> 01:22:06.400]  Randy, how are they going to come up with some reasonable belief if they don't do any due diligence?
[01:22:06.400 --> 01:22:13.040]  Do you think of any way? Otherwise, it's just frivolous, right?
[01:22:14.080 --> 01:22:18.640]  Can you read that again? That was a little long and I was trying to put all the pieces together.
[01:22:19.200 --> 01:22:26.560]  It is long. So yeah, that's one of the longer ones. But it says that the lawyer shall not bring
[01:22:26.560 --> 01:22:37.040]  or defend a proceeding or assert or controvert an issue therein. So all of that is basically,
[01:22:37.040 --> 01:22:41.760]  you can't argue anything. You can't come bringing it. You can't defend it. You can't assert it.
[01:22:41.760 --> 01:22:50.080]  You can't controvert anything in it unless the lawyer reasonably believes that there's a basis
[01:22:50.080 --> 01:23:02.080]  for doing so that's not frivolous. Those are a lot of words to say you can't be us to court.
[01:23:04.720 --> 01:23:08.880]  Right. Stop causing trouble for no reason.
[01:23:11.920 --> 01:23:18.480]  So that's rule 3.01. They seem to commonly violate that one. So 302 says
[01:23:18.480 --> 01:23:26.400]  they shall not take a position that unreasonably increases the costs or other burdens of the case
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:32.480]  or a position that unreasonably delays resolution of the matter.
[01:23:33.920 --> 01:23:40.720]  Dude, they do that every day. These motions for continuance just because, well, your honor,
[01:23:40.720 --> 01:23:49.040]  I wasn't ready, leaves the person in the lurch for another month or two. That's unreasonably
[01:23:49.040 --> 01:23:58.960]  delaying resolution of the matter. I think you hit on the one that is the most
[01:24:00.320 --> 01:24:07.600]  onerous is where the lawyer doesn't maintain, properly maintain his schedule
[01:24:07.600 --> 01:24:15.360]  and then he's unable to meet his obligations. That should get a bar grievous every time.
[01:24:19.920 --> 01:24:27.440]  So then we have rule 303 in subsection A1. It says the lawyer shall not knowingly make a
[01:24:27.440 --> 01:24:38.000]  false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal. Have that one happened?
[01:24:38.880 --> 01:24:48.880]  Ever had that not happened? So in Texas, that's rule 303 subsection A1 shall not knowingly make a
[01:24:48.880 --> 01:24:55.520]  false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal. There are so many of those. 303A2
[01:24:55.520 --> 01:25:04.880]  is pretty similar. But he failed to disclose a fact to a tribunal when disclosure is necessary to
[01:25:04.880 --> 01:25:11.280]  avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act. So there's some kind of fraud going on and the
[01:25:11.280 --> 01:25:16.560]  lawyer does not raise his hand and say, excuse me, your honor, I'm sorry, this is fraud. I can't
[01:25:16.560 --> 01:25:24.320]  be part of this. I've got to let you know about this. He doesn't do that. Then he just earned a
[01:25:24.320 --> 01:25:32.400]  bar grievance for 303A2. There's almost no chance that a lawyer is going to defy a client unless
[01:25:33.760 --> 01:25:43.040]  the client is almost negligent. Any client with money, no way the lawyer is going to do that to
[01:25:43.040 --> 01:25:52.240]  a client that might cost him his client or might cause him to earn less money. I was just working
[01:25:52.240 --> 01:25:59.840]  on a section on how to think about lawyers and that was one of the things I addressed is the
[01:25:59.840 --> 01:26:06.480]  lawyer is in business to make money. He don't really care about you. Well, I mean, he may care,
[01:26:06.480 --> 01:26:14.640]  but what he cares more about is making money. You know, he watched Perry Mason and he'd like to
[01:26:15.520 --> 01:26:19.280]  do the right thing for the right reason and always get his client off,
[01:26:19.280 --> 01:26:24.560]  but that's not his primary purpose. He's in business to make money. Whatever makes him
[01:26:24.560 --> 01:26:35.440]  the most money, that's what he's going to do. Always. If in him making money, he adequately
[01:26:35.440 --> 01:26:45.280]  adjudicates your case, you're lucky. But if it comes between adjudicating your case and him
[01:26:45.280 --> 01:26:54.960]  annoying the judge or having to work harder and make less money, unless you're a really rich client,
[01:26:56.080 --> 01:27:03.840]  he's going to go for what makes most money. If it means throwing you under the bus, well, life is tough.
[01:27:08.160 --> 01:27:14.240]  Well, we have here in 303. We also have another one that is similar. It says that the lawyer shall
[01:27:14.240 --> 01:27:22.240]  not knowingly offer or use evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. So you're talking about these
[01:27:22.240 --> 01:27:28.320]  foreclosure fraud and the lawyer can't be said to not know. I mean, they process these day in, day
[01:27:28.320 --> 01:27:35.040]  out. They know they're false. Of course they know. Well, every one of them that they do,
[01:27:35.040 --> 01:27:42.080]  they're in violation of this particular rule, 303A5, shall not knowingly offer or use evidence
[01:27:42.080 --> 01:27:48.320]  that the lawyer knows to be false. And 303B goes hand in hand with that. It says that the
[01:27:48.320 --> 01:27:53.440]  lawyer shall make a good faith effort to persuade the client to authorize the lawyer to correct
[01:27:53.440 --> 01:28:01.200]  or withdraw the false material evidence. Don't go and have that hard conversation with their client
[01:28:01.200 --> 01:28:13.280]  to try to persuade the client to get that corrected. They violated again. That's rule 303B.
[01:28:14.400 --> 01:28:20.800]  And they also acted in concert and collusion. Oh, now we're going into criminal. Absolutely.
[01:28:20.800 --> 01:28:31.760]  If a lawyer knowingly uses false evidence, that's a big deal. Again, why do we need
[01:28:31.760 --> 01:28:39.120]  rules like this? Why should there have to be a rule that they have to violate to say don't offer or
[01:28:39.120 --> 01:28:50.720]  use evidence you know is false? We are dealing with lawyers, remember? Yes. They're a special
[01:28:50.720 --> 01:29:02.800]  breed. All right, so we have 309A says that the lawyer shall refrain from prosecuting or
[01:29:02.800 --> 01:29:08.800]  threatening to prosecute a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause.
[01:29:08.800 --> 01:29:19.200]  Oh, how many did we just hit right there? Wait a minute. That's in the bar standards? Yes,
[01:29:19.920 --> 01:29:25.520]  309 subsection A. You can hit on that at that time. I'm sorry, you're reading Texas.
[01:29:26.400 --> 01:29:34.080]  Because the federal model bar standards has a separate section for prosecutors. And I would
[01:29:34.080 --> 01:29:38.960]  expected that to be on the prosecutor's section, but I don't think Texas does.
[01:29:41.440 --> 01:29:47.280]  I mean, does have a separate section for criminal for prosecutors as opposed to civil lawyers.
[01:29:49.600 --> 01:29:54.640]  Yeah, so we'll continue with rule 309 after we come back from our sponsors.
[01:29:56.400 --> 01:29:57.760]  We will be right back.
[01:29:57.760 --> 01:30:07.200]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. If you build an electrical smart grid,
[01:30:07.200 --> 01:30:11.440]  the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic blackout.
[01:30:11.440 --> 01:30:15.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:15.760 --> 01:30:21.440]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.440 --> 01:30:25.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.760 --> 01:30:32.640]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:32.640 --> 01:30:37.280]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by startpage.com,
[01:30:37.280 --> 01:30:43.280]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Start Page.
[01:30:45.280 --> 01:30:50.400]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into your home
[01:30:50.400 --> 01:30:55.680]  too with a smart grid. So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely
[01:30:55.680 --> 01:31:01.360]  monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure. But cybersecurity expert David
[01:31:01.360 --> 01:31:06.400]  Chalk says not so fast if we make the national power grid controllable through the web,
[01:31:06.400 --> 01:31:12.480]  hackers will have a field day. Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation,
[01:31:12.480 --> 01:31:18.800]  leaving us vulnerable to our enemies. I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[01:31:18.800 --> 01:31:23.120]  The catastrophic failures caused by hackers? There's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.120 --> 01:31:28.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.200 --> 01:31:36.640]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.640 --> 01:31:41.440]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1500 architects and engineers have
[01:31:41.440 --> 01:31:45.760]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have
[01:31:45.760 --> 01:31:49.200]  given their lives and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.200 --> 01:31:51.520]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.520 --> 01:31:54.080]  I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.080 --> 01:31:58.320]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.320 --> 01:32:01.040]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.800 --> 01:32:06.800]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[01:32:06.800 --> 01:32:10.160]  we live in an us against them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free
[01:32:10.160 --> 01:32:14.320]  society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are
[01:32:14.320 --> 01:32:17.920]  the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:17.920 --> 01:32:22.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:26.240]  expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.240 --> 01:32:29.360]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.360 --> 01:32:32.480]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[01:32:32.480 --> 01:32:36.000]  understand what due process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:43.440]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:43.440 --> 01:32:48.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009
[01:32:48.000 --> 01:32:51.840]  seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to
[01:32:51.840 --> 01:32:55.760]  fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your
[01:32:55.760 --> 01:32:59.360]  copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:59.360 --> 01:33:11.760]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.760 --> 01:33:56.560]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[01:33:56.560 --> 01:34:05.120]  Rule of Law Radio and Brett's going through the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedures that
[01:34:05.120 --> 01:34:11.360]  right. There are standards. Disciplinary rules of professional conduct. Okay. TDRPC,
[01:34:11.360 --> 01:34:15.760]  it's what the attorneys are required to follow if they're a state bar member in Texas.
[01:34:16.880 --> 01:34:23.200]  So we're on 309 and we're seeing what they're not allowed to do or what they must do.
[01:34:23.200 --> 01:34:32.400]  And it says, this is a big one that they do pretty often, 309 subsection C. The lawyer
[01:34:32.400 --> 01:34:40.080]  shall not initiate or encourage efforts to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver
[01:34:40.080 --> 01:34:45.840]  of important pretrial, trial or post trial rights. I don't know why they said pretrial,
[01:34:45.840 --> 01:34:51.760]  trial or post trial. They could have just said rights. But if that lawyer is trying to
[01:34:51.760 --> 01:35:00.880]  get an accused to waive the accused's rights, that right there is bar grievance material.
[01:35:00.880 --> 01:35:11.120]  Boom. Whether he waives his rights or not, he tried and that's a bar grievance. 309C. 309D
[01:35:12.320 --> 01:35:19.280]  says that the lawyer shall make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information
[01:35:19.280 --> 01:35:25.360]  known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense.
[01:35:27.440 --> 01:35:35.280]  How often do they do that? Always. 2.01, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. It shall be the duty
[01:35:35.280 --> 01:35:44.400]  of the prosecuting attorney not to secure conviction, but to ensure that justice is served. He shall
[01:35:44.400 --> 01:35:49.840]  not seek witnesses or evidence that would show the innocence of the accused or mitigate the guilt
[01:35:49.840 --> 01:36:00.400]  of the accused. So that one reflects that requirement exactly. And here we have, let's move to rule 4.
[01:36:00.400 --> 01:36:08.080]  4.01, subsection A says that the lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of material
[01:36:08.080 --> 01:36:12.960]  fact or law. This is very similar to what we saw earlier that they're not allowed to deceive their
[01:36:12.960 --> 01:36:17.840]  client. They're not allowed to deceive a judge. But now here they're not allowed to just any
[01:36:17.840 --> 01:36:22.640]  false statement. Well, that seems like they've said that's three or four different ones.
[01:36:23.280 --> 01:36:26.720]  Well, it depends on who they're allowed to or not allowed to deceive.
[01:36:32.320 --> 01:36:37.600]  So they speak to that a lot. I wonder why.
[01:36:37.600 --> 01:36:41.120]  Does it seem like that might be necessary?
[01:36:44.720 --> 01:36:50.080]  Okay. We close up pretty soon. We've got another call. Let's see what we've got.
[01:36:52.080 --> 01:36:58.480]  Let's go ahead and go to Ken. A few more. Okay. Okay. Let's go through them quickly.
[01:36:59.280 --> 01:37:03.440]  Yeah, we've got a few more and then it's just going to be after that it would be
[01:37:03.440 --> 01:37:10.720]  the supervisors and partners of law firms being responsible for the ones we've just been discussing
[01:37:11.280 --> 01:37:21.280]  and for judges being required to report these violations. So these few more here are in 4.01.
[01:37:25.920 --> 01:37:32.720]  Let's look at 4.04. Shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass,
[01:37:32.720 --> 01:37:37.920]  delay, or burden a third person. So that could be used if somebody's
[01:37:39.760 --> 01:37:42.960]  a lawyer that's trying to prevent you from having your records requests.
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:48.560]  I'm glad that's just for lawyers because I do that to lawyers all the time.
[01:37:52.960 --> 01:37:59.280]  That's a good point. Shall not use methods of obtaining evidence that violates the legal rights
[01:37:59.280 --> 01:38:07.360]  of such a person. Again, why do we need such a rule? Because that's the standard practice.
[01:38:08.480 --> 01:38:13.280]  Even your own lawyer will go to great lengths to get you to waive your rights.
[01:38:17.360 --> 01:38:25.920]  And last but not least, 4.04 B2. Shall not present, participating, presenting, or a
[01:38:25.920 --> 01:38:31.280]  threaten to present civil, criminal, or disciplinary charges against a complainant,
[01:38:31.280 --> 01:38:37.920]  a witness, or a potential witness in a bar disciplinary proceeding solely to prevent
[01:38:37.920 --> 01:38:44.720]  participation by the complainant witness or potential witness therein. So they can't threaten
[01:38:44.720 --> 01:38:51.040]  in any way. This is kind of goes to the retaliation, obstruction as well.
[01:38:51.040 --> 01:38:54.800]  Yeah. 36.05, 36.06.
[01:38:55.440 --> 01:39:02.480]  Yes. And if they do that, they've not only committed the crime in a Texas criminal capacity,
[01:39:02.480 --> 01:39:08.400]  but they've also violated this rule of what they swore that they were going to follow,
[01:39:08.400 --> 01:39:15.360]  that to be an ethical lawyer. So there you have it. And then, like I said, 501,
[01:39:15.360 --> 01:39:22.160]  and forward goes to who is responsible and who has to deal with these issues
[01:39:22.720 --> 01:39:30.240]  and becomes complicit if they don't. So shall we go ahead and take colors?
[01:39:30.240 --> 01:39:34.560]  Yeah. Let's go to Ken. Hello, Ken. What do you have for us today?
[01:39:36.080 --> 01:39:38.080]  How you doing, Randy? How you doing, Bart?
[01:39:39.120 --> 01:39:42.960]  And we got John from New York on, but I think he fell asleep.
[01:39:42.960 --> 01:39:48.640]  Yeah. I just wanted to show you that not everybody in New York was asleep.
[01:39:52.160 --> 01:39:55.360]  It's been a long and difficult year, I'll tell you.
[01:39:57.040 --> 01:39:58.560]  Oh, especially in New York.
[01:39:59.600 --> 01:40:06.720]  Yeah. I talked about that some other time, but I just felt that I'd become very dark and political,
[01:40:06.720 --> 01:40:10.560]  and I didn't think it was appropriate, you know, for this show.
[01:40:10.560 --> 01:40:16.480]  Oh, yeah. I understand dark. I've struggled with that myself.
[01:40:17.280 --> 01:40:24.480]  I've been producing the show for Tom Kiley, and I don't do politics. I avoid politics,
[01:40:24.480 --> 01:40:30.320]  and Tom's show is about politics, and I find it very depressing.
[01:40:31.120 --> 01:40:35.520]  It can bring a nasty streak out on you, and it's just, you know,
[01:40:35.520 --> 01:40:44.720]  it's, I just can't believe that the country has allowed itself to go down this path like this.
[01:40:45.760 --> 01:40:51.920]  Well, one of the things Tom was talking about is what he called buyer's remorse.
[01:40:52.640 --> 01:41:00.720]  He's seeing a lot of Democrats who appear to be unhappy with what's going on.
[01:41:00.720 --> 01:41:09.200]  One specific issue was a number of Democrats are grafting legislation for the purpose of
[01:41:09.200 --> 01:41:14.720]  taking the nuclear keys away from the president and giving it to a committee.
[01:41:17.200 --> 01:41:24.400]  Six weeks into his term, his own party is trying to take the nuclear keys away from him.
[01:41:24.960 --> 01:41:28.160]  That's never been done to any president.
[01:41:28.160 --> 01:41:34.800]  Yeah. Well, I don't think he even knows where the keys are. I mean,
[01:41:40.720 --> 01:41:44.240]  I have a real question. We'll talk about it some other time, but
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:52.400]  Rudy Giuliani had his bar card pulled out of a while back. You heard about that?
[01:41:53.280 --> 01:41:53.920]  No, I didn't.
[01:41:53.920 --> 01:42:02.640]  Well, according to the news that I heard, local news, his bar card was pulled. I guess a judge
[01:42:02.640 --> 01:42:07.760]  did. I don't know. But they said he can still practice because he still has his license. I was
[01:42:07.760 --> 01:42:11.440]  always under the impression that there was no license and it was just a bar card.
[01:42:12.320 --> 01:42:20.560]  No. Generally, the Supreme Court issues a license and the state bar issues a bar card.
[01:42:20.560 --> 01:42:28.480]  Okay. There used to be a lot of patriots stuff around about lawyers not having licenses.
[01:42:29.520 --> 01:42:39.280]  And a friend of mine was talking to a lawyer and he was having a problem with a lawyer and he
[01:42:39.280 --> 01:42:44.320]  asked him for his license. You know, I'm sorry, he made the comment about lawyers not having
[01:42:44.320 --> 01:42:48.320]  license. And the guy said, of course we have a license. He said, well, over the years,
[01:42:48.320 --> 01:42:52.800]  he's just right there on the wall and show it to him. It was issued by the Supreme Court.
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:59.280]  So the Supreme issues the license and the state bar issues the bar card.
[01:43:01.360 --> 01:43:08.240]  And that begs the question. If you have a license from the Supreme,
[01:43:09.600 --> 01:43:13.520]  do you still have to have a bar card in order to be able to practice?
[01:43:13.520 --> 01:43:21.440]  No. It would seem the license would be what would give grant you the power to
[01:43:22.640 --> 01:43:25.760]  practice and not the bar card. That's just an association.
[01:43:27.840 --> 01:43:35.280]  Is it possible that maybe on a lesser lawyer, you need the bar in order to provide you with
[01:43:35.280 --> 01:43:44.560]  the bar? Maybe that's the purpose of the bar card. Hang on. We'll have to go to our sponsor,
[01:43:44.560 --> 01:43:52.400]  Dr. Andy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rural Law Radio. We're going to our last segment.
[01:43:53.200 --> 01:43:55.360]  Hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:43:55.360 --> 01:44:06.320]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.320 --> 01:44:11.120]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.120 --> 01:44:17.440]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.440 --> 01:44:22.240]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:22.240 --> 01:44:28.400]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse
[01:44:28.400 --> 01:44:34.240]  all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[01:44:34.240 --> 01:44:39.840]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.840 --> 01:44:46.560]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality
[01:44:46.560 --> 01:44:52.960]  radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[01:44:52.960 --> 01:44:59.680]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:03.280 --> 01:45:05.840]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:06.400 --> 01:45:10.640]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable,
[01:45:10.640 --> 01:45:17.040]  easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:17.680 --> 01:45:22.960]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:45:22.960 --> 01:45:28.240]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course,
[01:45:28.240 --> 01:45:35.440]  and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[01:45:35.440 --> 01:45:41.200]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:41.200 --> 01:45:46.800]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[01:45:46.800 --> 01:45:54.480]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more.
[01:45:54.480 --> 01:46:06.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:24.480 --> 01:46:54.000]  The people come down from the hill,
[01:46:54.480 --> 01:47:13.760]  and a flag is polític, and so the law is
[01:47:13.760 --> 01:47:15.480]  been here all night.
[01:47:15.480 --> 01:47:18.280]  Well, we tried to get a hold of you two or three times
[01:47:18.280 --> 01:47:19.680]  and couldn't get you.
[01:47:19.680 --> 01:47:23.120]  And we had a lot of fun at your expense
[01:47:23.120 --> 01:47:27.120]  about you falling asleep again, because you were so old.
[01:47:27.120 --> 01:47:30.280]  I assure you, I wasn't sleeping after you get to sleep.
[01:47:30.280 --> 01:47:31.960]  Your phone wasn't working, because we
[01:47:31.960 --> 01:47:35.120]  tried to get to you.
[01:47:35.120 --> 01:47:36.920]  Sorry about that, because you'd been on all night,
[01:47:36.920 --> 01:47:40.320]  and that was kind of, we tried to get you at the top of the hour.
[01:47:40.320 --> 01:47:45.320]  So we missed the whole hour.
[01:47:45.320 --> 01:47:48.320]  OK.
[01:47:48.320 --> 01:47:50.320]  Go ahead, let me finish up with Ken,
[01:47:50.320 --> 01:47:54.320]  and then I'll get right back to you.
[01:47:54.320 --> 01:47:55.320]  Oops.
[01:47:55.320 --> 01:47:58.320]  Go ahead, Ken.
[01:47:58.320 --> 01:48:04.320]  Yeah, well, that was my question, you know, pretty much.
[01:48:04.320 --> 01:48:08.320]  I was, again, I wasn't aware that that was any kind of a patriot
[01:48:08.320 --> 01:48:12.320]  thing or not, but I just thought that, you know,
[01:48:12.320 --> 01:48:15.320]  based on what I heard from you, is that if you got a bar card
[01:48:15.320 --> 01:48:20.320]  pulled up, that meant like death or something like that, no?
[01:48:20.320 --> 01:48:26.320]  Yeah, well, that's always been what the word was,
[01:48:26.320 --> 01:48:29.320]  but you asked the question, and it certainly
[01:48:29.320 --> 01:48:31.320]  had begged that question.
[01:48:31.320 --> 01:48:40.320]  If the state supreme authorized me to practice law
[01:48:40.320 --> 01:48:43.320]  and issued a license to me for that purpose,
[01:48:43.320 --> 01:48:47.320]  why the heck would an association?
[01:48:47.320 --> 01:48:53.320]  The bar is only a quasi-governmental agency.
[01:48:53.320 --> 01:49:00.320]  It's really a private membership association.
[01:49:00.320 --> 01:49:08.320]  And I don't know of any law that requires a bar card.
[01:49:08.320 --> 01:49:11.320]  They do require a license, you know,
[01:49:11.320 --> 01:49:13.320]  just like I got a license to drive,
[01:49:13.320 --> 01:49:17.320]  a doctor's got a license, a plumber has a license,
[01:49:17.320 --> 01:49:19.320]  and a lawyer has a license.
[01:49:19.320 --> 01:49:22.320]  When you say the supreme court issued it,
[01:49:22.320 --> 01:49:24.320]  do you mean the federal supreme?
[01:49:24.320 --> 01:49:26.320]  Because, you know, in the Supreme Court,
[01:49:26.320 --> 01:49:28.320]  it's like the bottom of the barrel.
[01:49:28.320 --> 01:49:31.320]  Yeah, and New York is different.
[01:49:31.320 --> 01:49:35.320]  Well, in Texas, it's the Texas supreme.
[01:49:35.320 --> 01:49:37.320]  Okay.
[01:49:37.320 --> 01:49:40.320]  In New York, the lowest court is called the supreme.
[01:49:40.320 --> 01:49:43.320]  I thought that was odd when I found that out.
[01:49:43.320 --> 01:49:46.320]  Yeah, the appellate court is really the one
[01:49:46.320 --> 01:49:50.320]  where you get some action done.
[01:49:50.320 --> 01:49:52.320]  It's like going to these coffee shops
[01:49:52.320 --> 01:49:57.320]  and they say ground day when they mean tiny.
[01:49:57.320 --> 01:50:01.320]  All right, I'll go and I'll try to call you back next week.
[01:50:01.320 --> 01:50:04.320]  By the way, I did, even though I didn't call,
[01:50:04.320 --> 01:50:08.320]  I lost a Benjamin for you a couple months ago.
[01:50:08.320 --> 01:50:09.320]  Oh, you did?
[01:50:09.320 --> 01:50:10.320]  Yes.
[01:50:10.320 --> 01:50:11.320]  Oh, okay.
[01:50:11.320 --> 01:50:12.320]  Yeah, I definitely saw that.
[01:50:12.320 --> 01:50:14.320]  I don't get any of this, so I don't know about it.
[01:50:14.320 --> 01:50:15.320]  But thank you.
[01:50:15.320 --> 01:50:16.320]  Thank you.
[01:50:16.320 --> 01:50:23.320]  I just wanted to say, well, I'll just tell them I'm alive still.
[01:50:23.320 --> 01:50:24.320]  Good night, guys.
[01:50:24.320 --> 01:50:25.320]  Okay.
[01:50:25.320 --> 01:50:26.320]  Thank you, Ken.
[01:50:26.320 --> 01:50:27.320]  Okay.
[01:50:27.320 --> 01:50:29.320]  Now we're going to John in New York.
[01:50:29.320 --> 01:50:30.320]  Okay, John.
[01:50:30.320 --> 01:50:31.320]  Hello.
[01:50:31.320 --> 01:50:33.320]  How are you doing?
[01:50:33.320 --> 01:50:35.320]  I'm doing good.
[01:50:35.320 --> 01:50:40.320]  If you were listening, were you listening?
[01:50:40.320 --> 01:50:42.320]  Yeah.
[01:50:42.320 --> 01:50:47.320]  You should have heard us trying to go to you.
[01:50:47.320 --> 01:50:51.320]  We tried to get to you before the top of the hour
[01:50:51.320 --> 01:50:54.320]  and then at the top of the hour.
[01:50:54.320 --> 01:50:58.320]  I think you fell asleep with the cat in your lap.
[01:50:58.320 --> 01:51:00.320]  No, I don't think so.
[01:51:00.320 --> 01:51:02.320]  I went up to the men's room a couple, three times.
[01:51:02.320 --> 01:51:04.320]  Oh, that might have been it.
[01:51:04.320 --> 01:51:05.320]  Okay.
[01:51:05.320 --> 01:51:06.320]  Okay.
[01:51:06.320 --> 01:51:07.320]  What do you have for us?
[01:51:07.320 --> 01:51:09.320]  Anyway, what would you like to discuss tonight?
[01:51:09.320 --> 01:51:15.320]  That's Aaron Snowflake, Tiddly Winks, or, you know, what's on your mind?
[01:51:15.320 --> 01:51:17.320]  No, I'm not the caller.
[01:51:17.320 --> 01:51:18.320]  You are.
[01:51:18.320 --> 01:51:19.320]  Oh, okay.
[01:51:19.320 --> 01:51:20.320]  All right.
[01:51:20.320 --> 01:51:21.320]  There you go.
[01:51:21.320 --> 01:51:24.320]  He said he didn't fall asleep.
[01:51:24.320 --> 01:51:27.320]  He hasn't woke up yet.
[01:51:27.320 --> 01:51:29.320]  Well, anyway.
[01:51:29.320 --> 01:51:30.320]  Okay.
[01:51:30.320 --> 01:51:31.320]  Okay.
[01:51:31.320 --> 01:51:34.320]  Latest on the bar on the vaccine.
[01:51:34.320 --> 01:51:35.320]  Right.
[01:51:35.320 --> 01:51:38.320]  There is so much we could spend an entire show on it.
[01:51:38.320 --> 01:51:41.320]  I'll just wrap it up in a summary form and say,
[01:51:41.320 --> 01:51:45.320]  if anybody gets the vaccine, they're out of their freaking mind.
[01:51:45.320 --> 01:51:51.320]  There is so much, not only people have dropped dead all over the world,
[01:51:51.320 --> 01:51:55.320]  and people are getting very sick all over the world,
[01:51:55.320 --> 01:52:00.320]  and it's pretty much the same things over and over.
[01:52:00.320 --> 01:52:06.320]  The Gillian Barr syndrome, which is the body's way of eating its own.
[01:52:06.320 --> 01:52:10.320]  I said eating its own nervous system.
[01:52:10.320 --> 01:52:12.320]  There's spells, Paul T.
[01:52:12.320 --> 01:52:15.320]  If your face flopped on one side for a few months,
[01:52:15.320 --> 01:52:18.320]  the ladies ought to really love that.
[01:52:18.320 --> 01:52:22.320]  Let's see.
[01:52:22.320 --> 01:52:28.320]  The FDA, which is corrupt as it gets, even the FDA admits it causes
[01:52:28.320 --> 01:52:43.320]  attack, stroke, and anaphylactic shock.
[01:52:43.320 --> 01:52:46.320]  If you are HIV positive, I wouldn't get it.
[01:52:46.320 --> 01:52:51.320]  If you have recently been put into remission for cancer,
[01:52:51.320 --> 01:52:54.320]  I certainly wouldn't get it.
[01:52:54.320 --> 01:52:58.320]  All vaccines lower your immune system,
[01:52:58.320 --> 01:53:01.320]  and with cancer patients being put in remission,
[01:53:01.320 --> 01:53:04.320]  that is the last thing in the world you want.
[01:53:04.320 --> 01:53:05.320]  Let's see.
[01:53:05.320 --> 01:53:07.320]  Where do we go from here?
[01:53:07.320 --> 01:53:10.320]  Oh, there's so much.
[01:53:10.320 --> 01:53:13.320]  I'll just try to summarize it as best I can.
[01:53:13.320 --> 01:53:16.320]  Expect adverse reactions.
[01:53:16.320 --> 01:53:22.320]  Participants in every COVID-19 vaccine administration have reported
[01:53:22.320 --> 01:53:25.320]  adverse reactions, including high fever, chills,
[01:53:25.320 --> 01:53:27.320]  also pain, headaches.
[01:53:27.320 --> 01:53:32.320]  Some have even reported severe reactions that require hospitalizations,
[01:53:32.320 --> 01:53:34.320]  like the ball player.
[01:53:34.320 --> 01:53:38.320]  Death is a side effect of the vaccines.
[01:53:38.320 --> 01:53:43.320]  Anyway, the long-term effects,
[01:53:43.320 --> 01:53:47.320]  according to the FDA, potential long-term effects may include
[01:53:47.320 --> 01:53:52.320]  bar syndrome, brain swelling, muscle weakness, paralysis,
[01:53:52.320 --> 01:53:56.320]  convulsions, seizures, stroke, narcolepsy, shock, heart attack,
[01:53:56.320 --> 01:53:59.320]  autoimmune disease, arthritis, joint pain,
[01:53:59.320 --> 01:54:03.320]  multi-system inflammatory syndrome in children,
[01:54:03.320 --> 01:54:06.320]  and death, yes, even death.
[01:54:06.320 --> 01:54:12.320]  Some UK health workers in the UK, which is a good place to have
[01:54:12.320 --> 01:54:15.320]  health workers if they're from the UK, to be in the UK,
[01:54:15.320 --> 01:54:20.320]  they have experienced anaphylactic shock after receiving one dose
[01:54:20.320 --> 01:54:22.320]  of the approved vaccine.
[01:54:22.320 --> 01:54:26.320]  It won't prevent COVID-19.
[01:54:26.320 --> 01:54:30.320]  An FDA Pfizer briefing paper published December 10, 2020,
[01:54:30.320 --> 01:54:39.320]  revealed 43% more suspected cases of COVID-19 in the vaccinated group.
[01:54:39.320 --> 01:54:46.320]  43% more suspected cases of COVID-19 virus in the vaccinated group
[01:54:46.320 --> 01:54:49.320]  than in the placebo group within 17...
[01:54:49.320 --> 01:54:52.320]  It's like a joke.
[01:54:52.320 --> 01:54:54.320]  It's not even funny.
[01:54:54.320 --> 01:55:00.320]  No, and people are dying, and they're dying to get the shot.
[01:55:00.320 --> 01:55:05.320]  It will not prevent COVID-19.
[01:55:05.320 --> 01:55:09.320]  Just a little side comment talking to Tina.
[01:55:09.320 --> 01:55:16.320]  She was talking to the prosecutor who is handling the Manukin case,
[01:55:16.320 --> 01:55:21.320]  and he apologized for dropping out a site for a while,
[01:55:21.320 --> 01:55:25.320]  but he had a bad reaction to the COVID vaccine.
[01:55:25.320 --> 01:55:29.320]  Oh, it's left and right, left and right.
[01:55:29.320 --> 01:55:33.320]  It isn't, you know, oh, well, there's a few cases.
[01:55:33.320 --> 01:55:35.320]  No, it's widespread.
[01:55:35.320 --> 01:55:37.320]  It's like an epidemic itself.
[01:55:37.320 --> 01:55:41.320]  The reactions are like an epidemic itself.
[01:55:41.320 --> 01:55:43.320]  The virus has a survival rate.
[01:55:43.320 --> 01:55:47.320]  If you get the COVID-19 virus, some people have died,
[01:55:47.320 --> 01:55:49.320]  and that's serious.
[01:55:49.320 --> 01:55:51.320]  We don't want to lose anybody.
[01:55:51.320 --> 01:55:54.320]  One death is too many, but the fact remains
[01:55:54.320 --> 01:55:59.320]  that COVID-19 kills far fewer people than the flu.
[01:55:59.320 --> 01:56:01.320]  It could make you sterile.
[01:56:01.320 --> 01:56:04.320]  It destroys the placenta.
[01:56:04.320 --> 01:56:07.320]  I'm just touching the surface right now.
[01:56:07.320 --> 01:56:10.320]  Recently, I got to find it.
[01:56:10.320 --> 01:56:16.320]  India, France, Russia, Australia,
[01:56:16.320 --> 01:56:20.320]  and pharmaceuticals themselves.
[01:56:20.320 --> 01:56:25.320]  The people that make the vaccine are pulling away from using it.
[01:56:25.320 --> 01:56:26.320]  Why?
[01:56:26.320 --> 01:56:27.320]  Because it is dangerous.
[01:56:27.320 --> 01:56:28.320]  It kills people.
[01:56:28.320 --> 01:56:30.320]  It causes serious illness.
[01:56:30.320 --> 01:56:34.320]  So anybody, the last thing I'll say about the virus,
[01:56:34.320 --> 01:56:36.320]  there's plenty more I could tell you.
[01:56:36.320 --> 01:56:40.320]  But if you get the vaccine, you've been warned,
[01:56:40.320 --> 01:56:43.320]  and it's going to be your funeral.
[01:56:43.320 --> 01:56:45.320]  And that is the best thing that I...
[01:56:45.320 --> 01:56:47.320]  Oh, he can't say that.
[01:56:47.320 --> 01:56:49.320]  Oh, that's conspiracy theory.
[01:56:49.320 --> 01:56:51.320]  Ask the people that are dead.
[01:56:51.320 --> 01:56:55.320]  Maybe they'll tell you whether or not it's a conspiracy theory.
[01:56:55.320 --> 01:56:57.320]  So that's the best I can tell you.
[01:56:57.320 --> 01:57:00.320]  And that's where...
[01:57:00.320 --> 01:57:05.320]  And now Mr. Cuomo, the local people here in my area,
[01:57:05.320 --> 01:57:09.320]  they retain the services of a local lawyer.
[01:57:09.320 --> 01:57:15.320]  And he himself, the lawyer himself, is the landlord.
[01:57:15.320 --> 01:57:18.320]  And he's got a lot of people that haven't paid,
[01:57:18.320 --> 01:57:21.320]  even though they can pay, they haven't paid.
[01:57:21.320 --> 01:57:24.320]  They're working, I'm sure.
[01:57:24.320 --> 01:57:28.320]  They have some people that aren't working that haven't paid him the rent.
[01:57:28.320 --> 01:57:32.320]  But the lawyer has people that haven't paid him for one reason or another.
[01:57:32.320 --> 01:57:35.320]  And he has a whole bunch of people he's representing.
[01:57:35.320 --> 01:57:39.320]  And one of the people that he's representing just told me today
[01:57:39.320 --> 01:57:43.320]  that his case is moving forward in the court.
[01:57:43.320 --> 01:57:47.320]  Now, what happens in the court, we don't know.
[01:57:47.320 --> 01:57:53.320]  Because Mr. Cuomo likes to wiggle his way out of everything.
[01:57:53.320 --> 01:57:56.320]  Well, from what I hear, the heat's really on.
[01:57:56.320 --> 01:58:03.320]  A lot more people are getting in line to get a shot at him.
[01:58:03.320 --> 01:58:06.320]  And that's good news.
[01:58:06.320 --> 01:58:08.320]  And they want to impeach him.
[01:58:08.320 --> 01:58:12.320]  Impeachment is around the corner, but we'll see if that happens.
[01:58:12.320 --> 01:58:15.320]  Okay, we are about out of time.
[01:58:15.320 --> 01:58:17.320]  Thank you, John.
[01:58:17.320 --> 01:58:21.320]  And sorry we couldn't get you at the top of the hour.
[01:58:21.320 --> 01:58:25.320]  This is Randy Kalkin with Brett Fountain Reel Law Radio.
[01:58:25.320 --> 01:58:30.320]  We will be back next week at our regular time on Thursday
[01:58:30.320 --> 01:58:34.320]  and Friday starting at 8 p.m. Central.
[01:58:34.320 --> 01:58:36.320]  Thursday is our two-hour show.
[01:58:36.320 --> 01:58:39.320]  Friday our four-hour info marathon.
[01:58:39.320 --> 01:58:41.320]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:41.320 --> 01:58:43.320]  And good night.
[01:58:43.320 --> 01:58:45.320]  God bless you all.
[01:58:45.320 --> 01:58:47.320]  God bless you all.
[01:58:47.320 --> 01:59:16.320]  God bless you all.
[01:59:17.320 --> 01:59:19.320]  God bless you all.
[01:59:48.320 --> 01:59:52.320]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.320 --> 01:59:54.320]  You found it.
[01:59:54.320 --> 02:00:18.320]  Go to www.GhostRadioNetwork.com