ROL_2021-02-04_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.040]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 Open with Precious Metals Gold $1,429 an ounce
[00:13.040 --> 00:17.760]  Silver $16.45 an ounce Copper $2.75 an ounce
[00:17.760 --> 00:20.960]  Oil Texas Crude $55.63 a barrel
[00:20.960 --> 00:25.480]  Brent Crude $62.47 a barrel and Crypto is an order of market cap
[00:25.480 --> 00:32.200]  Bitcoin Core $10,566.52 Ethereum $227.26
[00:32.200 --> 00:41.600]  XRP Ripple $0.33 Litecoin $100.31 and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin
[00:41.600 --> 00:52.440]  In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.440 --> 00:57.760]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing
[00:57.760 --> 01:04.760]  10 and entering 40 today in history.
[01:04.760 --> 01:09.400]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hempett
[01:09.400 --> 01:14.080]  attacks his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin
[01:14.080 --> 01:18.080]  and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:18.080 --> 01:22.280]  new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:22.280 --> 01:24.840]  equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:24.840 --> 01:28.480]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:28.480 --> 01:33.040]  she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.040 --> 01:34.040]  law.
[01:34.040 --> 01:37.640]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:37.640 --> 01:42.160]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.160 --> 01:48.320]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.320 --> 01:54.520]  well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.520 --> 01:59.000]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:59.000 --> 02:01.760]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.760 --> 02:06.800]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.800 --> 02:10.800]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.800 --> 02:13.520]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.520 --> 02:17.400]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches with their
[02:17.400 --> 02:22.640]  charge to it.
[02:22.640 --> 02:27.280]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[02:27.280 --> 02:32.400]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.400 --> 02:38.040]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.040 --> 02:39.540]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.540 --> 02:43.840]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:43.840 --> 02:50.120]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.120 --> 03:15.560]  glow.
[03:20.120 --> 03:24.120]  What is she gonna do? What is she gonna do?
[03:27.120 --> 03:30.120]  Bad boys, bad boys, what's she gonna do?
[03:30.120 --> 03:32.120]  What's she gonna do when they come for you?
[03:32.120 --> 03:35.120]  Bad boys, bad boys, what's she gonna do?
[03:35.120 --> 03:38.120]  What's she gonna do when they come for you?
[03:38.120 --> 03:41.120]  When you were eight and you had bad dreams
[03:41.120 --> 03:43.120]  You go to school and learn to go and learn to rule
[03:43.120 --> 03:46.120]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[03:46.120 --> 03:49.120]  It took it all to get the right-okay fuck you back
[03:49.120 --> 03:52.120]  Bad boys, bad boys, what's she gonna do?
[03:52.120 --> 03:54.120]  What's she gonna do when they come for you?
[03:54.120 --> 03:57.120]  Bad boys, bad boys, what's she gonna do?
[03:57.120 --> 04:00.120]  What's she gonna do when they come for you?
[04:00.120 --> 04:02.120]  You took a gun, that one, you took a gun, this one
[04:02.120 --> 04:04.120]  You took a gun, that one, you took a gun, this one
[04:04.120 --> 04:07.120]  Your old sure, or a little child, this one
[04:07.120 --> 04:09.120]  Your old sure, or a little child, this one
[04:09.120 --> 04:11.120]  You took a gun, that one, you took a gun, this one
[04:11.120 --> 04:14.120]  Bad boys, bad boys, what's she gonna do?
[04:14.120 --> 04:16.520]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:16.520 --> 04:18.280]  Bad boys, bad boys.
[04:18.280 --> 04:22.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:22.000 --> 04:24.360]  Okay, howdy, howdy.
[04:24.360 --> 04:26.360]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[04:26.360 --> 04:29.480]  Rue de la Radio on this Thursday,
[04:29.480 --> 04:34.640]  the fourth day of February, 2021.
[04:36.240 --> 04:38.200]  And we're gonna start out tonight
[04:38.200 --> 04:41.920]  talking about a little meeting I had
[04:41.920 --> 04:44.280]  with the local prosecuting attorney.
[04:46.000 --> 04:49.960]  I think we have them backed into a corner.
[04:51.200 --> 04:54.280]  Brett's been helpful in this endeavor.
[04:54.280 --> 04:57.960]  He got a critical response to an email
[04:57.960 --> 05:01.880]  from the, to a information request from the sheriff
[05:02.840 --> 05:07.840]  that effectively threw all his officers under the bus.
[05:08.960 --> 05:10.600]  So here's the deal.
[05:10.600 --> 05:13.440]  I had a meeting with the prosecutor
[05:13.440 --> 05:16.600]  and he actually called the meeting.
[05:16.600 --> 05:17.760]  As soon as I got there,
[05:17.760 --> 05:20.840]  he took me into the county judge's office.
[05:21.920 --> 05:25.440]  Now the county judge is the guy
[05:25.440 --> 05:27.800]  who used to be the district attorney.
[05:27.800 --> 05:30.560]  And I've spoken about Greg Lowry on the air before.
[05:31.440 --> 05:33.320]  And, you know, when everybody talks
[05:33.320 --> 05:36.000]  about all these prosecutors or a bunch of
[05:36.000 --> 05:37.960]  no good rascals, well, not all of them.
[05:37.960 --> 05:42.120]  If there is a prosecutor in the state of Texas
[05:42.120 --> 05:45.240]  who had his moral center in the right place,
[05:45.240 --> 05:46.880]  it was Greg Lowry.
[05:46.880 --> 05:48.920]  But now he is the county judge.
[05:50.200 --> 05:54.760]  And he really wants to do things right.
[05:54.760 --> 05:59.760]  And I've seen this when I actually talked to prosecutors.
[06:00.800 --> 06:03.240]  I get that they want to do the right thing,
[06:04.480 --> 06:06.400]  but they're stuck in a system
[06:06.400 --> 06:09.960]  where there are certain realities they have to deal with.
[06:09.960 --> 06:12.320]  And one of them is, is they've got this huge,
[06:13.840 --> 06:16.920]  huge docket that they have to work their way through.
[06:18.040 --> 06:20.760]  And over time, they've worked out some procedures
[06:20.760 --> 06:24.080]  that helped them get through the docket.
[06:24.080 --> 06:26.160]  The problem with those procedures
[06:27.200 --> 06:29.760]  is that they were illegal.
[06:31.080 --> 06:34.160]  And here, I put in an information request
[06:34.160 --> 06:39.160]  to the county attorney asking for all documents
[06:41.440 --> 06:45.120]  collected, symbol-maintained, I'm sorry, let me step back.
[06:45.120 --> 06:48.520]  I put in a request to the district clerk
[06:49.920 --> 06:51.920]  for all documents collected, symbol-maintained
[06:51.920 --> 06:54.520]  by the department that are specifically referenced
[06:54.520 --> 06:59.520]  by Article 1617 and 1620 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[06:59.520 --> 07:01.360]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[07:02.560 --> 07:07.240]  Those two documents are absolutely critical,
[07:07.240 --> 07:09.680]  primarily 16.17.
[07:12.360 --> 07:17.360]  It goes to how the system is put together,
[07:18.200 --> 07:22.000]  how jurisdiction moves from one party to another.
[07:23.320 --> 07:28.320]  The request for these documents to the clerk
[07:28.320 --> 07:31.040]  got a response from the county attorney
[07:31.040 --> 07:34.120]  and he said that they have no records responsive
[07:34.120 --> 07:37.280]  to my request and that in the 15 years
[07:37.280 --> 07:39.120]  he's been a prosecutor attorney,
[07:39.120 --> 07:41.200]  they've never done an examining trial.
[07:43.080 --> 07:46.320]  Whoa, so that was great.
[07:46.320 --> 07:47.560]  That was what I needed.
[07:47.560 --> 07:50.480]  And then Brett put in an information request
[07:50.480 --> 07:55.480]  to the sheriff asking for all the records of training
[07:55.480 --> 08:00.480]  for sheriff's deputies in arrest procedures.
[08:02.480 --> 08:04.640]  And got back a response that said
[08:04.640 --> 08:07.520]  we have no records responsive to your request.
[08:09.040 --> 08:14.040]  So what I'm going to do is look at the records
[08:15.960 --> 08:20.960]  of who's been arrested and if the person was arrested
[08:20.960 --> 08:25.960]  and taken to the jail and I can tell that
[08:26.000 --> 08:30.320]  if there is no 16.17 order.
[08:32.240 --> 08:35.680]  The Texas Penal Code, I'm sorry,
[08:35.680 --> 08:40.680]  the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure at 14.06.
[08:42.480 --> 08:47.480]  Chapter 14 addresses arrests for on-site offense
[08:48.080 --> 08:49.000]  without a warrant.
[08:49.000 --> 08:54.000]  So if the 14.03 says that they can't arrest someone
[08:54.840 --> 08:59.840]  for an on-site offense, 14.06 requires them
[09:00.520 --> 09:02.400]  to take the arrested person directly
[09:02.400 --> 09:03.840]  to the nearest magistrate.
[09:05.680 --> 09:10.040]  And then magistrates, who are magistrates?
[09:10.040 --> 09:15.040]  All judges are magistrates, all mayors are magistrates.
[09:15.040 --> 09:20.040]  And then that's 209, 210 says it's the duty
[09:23.440 --> 09:28.440]  of the magistrate to keep the peace in the state of Texas.
[09:29.840 --> 09:34.640]  And it specifically designates the state of Texas.
[09:34.640 --> 09:39.640]  That gives every magistrate statewide jurisdiction
[09:39.640 --> 09:44.240]  for the purpose of doing what they're required to do
[09:44.240 --> 09:49.240]  in section 2.11.
[09:49.360 --> 09:53.520]  2.11 says that when a magistrate sits for the purpose
[09:53.520 --> 09:57.080]  of examining into a criminal accusation,
[09:57.080 --> 09:59.280]  that is an examining court.
[10:00.600 --> 10:04.040]  An examining court is governed by Chapter 16.
[10:05.040 --> 10:08.680]  It looks just to be clear that this is not the normal court.
[10:08.680 --> 10:13.680]  This is not the thing that happens when, the trial
[10:15.000 --> 10:16.640]  that everybody thinks about.
[10:16.640 --> 10:17.520]  Yes.
[10:17.520 --> 10:21.840]  A preliminary upfront way for the thing
[10:21.840 --> 10:23.480]  to not even go to court.
[10:24.880 --> 10:29.880]  This is a judge acting not in the capacity of a judge,
[10:32.480 --> 10:35.600]  but in the capacity of a magistrate.
[10:35.600 --> 10:39.160]  And there are only three things a magistrate can do.
[10:40.560 --> 10:43.080]  I technically, there's four.
[10:43.080 --> 10:45.600]  He can act as a coroner.
[10:45.600 --> 10:48.760]  If they don't have a hired coroner,
[10:48.760 --> 10:51.080]  he goes in and pronounces people dead.
[10:51.080 --> 10:53.080]  He can marry people.
[10:53.080 --> 10:55.960]  And that's so he can make a few extra bucks.
[10:55.960 --> 10:59.920]  And he can hold an examining trial and set bail.
[11:01.120 --> 11:03.720]  And in the course of holding an examining trial,
[11:03.720 --> 11:05.800]  he can issue warrants.
[11:05.800 --> 11:07.320]  That's it.
[11:07.320 --> 11:09.080]  That's what a magistrate does.
[11:09.080 --> 11:14.080]  So when a criminal complaint is presented to some magistrate,
[11:16.440 --> 11:21.120]  even if he's a judge, that invokes his duty
[11:21.120 --> 11:23.120]  as a magistrate, not as a judge.
[11:23.120 --> 11:25.800]  When I Bushwack Bob Perkins,
[11:25.800 --> 11:28.240]  the head administrative judge,
[11:28.240 --> 11:32.400]  head criminal district judge in Travis County
[11:32.400 --> 11:35.400]  with criminal complaints against all the highest judges
[11:35.400 --> 11:38.040]  in Texas, the court of criminal appeals.
[11:38.040 --> 11:39.120]  He said, well, Mr. Calton,
[11:39.120 --> 11:42.280]  these are criminal complaints, yes, Your Honor, they are.
[11:42.280 --> 11:44.480]  He said, well, Mr. Calton, I'm a district judge
[11:44.480 --> 11:46.080]  and district judges in Travis County
[11:46.080 --> 11:47.560]  don't take criminal complaints.
[11:48.480 --> 11:49.600]  I said, that's okay, Your Honor.
[11:49.600 --> 11:53.080]  I'm not here to invoke your duty as a district judge.
[11:53.080 --> 11:55.680]  I'm here to invoke your duty as a magistrate.
[11:55.680 --> 11:58.640]  And that's a duty from which you may not shield yourself.
[11:59.760 --> 12:01.440]  And he got it.
[12:01.440 --> 12:03.360]  He didn't like it, but he got it.
[12:04.240 --> 12:06.080]  I invoked his duty as a magistrate.
[12:06.080 --> 12:11.080]  So when a judge or a mayor's duty as a magistrate
[12:13.280 --> 12:18.280]  is invoked, he must under chapter 16,
[12:18.360 --> 12:20.320]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
[12:20.320 --> 12:23.680]  examine into the sufficiency of an allegation
[12:23.680 --> 12:28.680]  and then make a determination of probable cause.
[12:31.560 --> 12:36.080]  If he finds, he or she finds probable cause,
[12:36.960 --> 12:41.960]  under 16.17, the magistrate must issue an order stating,
[12:44.480 --> 12:46.920]  I'm sorry, step back one step.
[12:48.640 --> 12:52.160]  When a magistrate holds an examining trial,
[12:52.160 --> 12:55.720]  when the trial is completed,
[12:56.760 --> 13:00.560]  he must make a determination of probable cause.
[13:00.560 --> 13:03.560]  If he finds probable cause,
[13:03.560 --> 13:07.760]  then he must, I'm sorry, once he makes a determination,
[13:07.760 --> 13:10.880]  he must issue an order as to whether
[13:10.880 --> 13:13.720]  he found probable cause or not.
[13:13.720 --> 13:18.720]  If not, the order releases the person at their liberty.
[13:19.480 --> 13:21.120]  If he did find probable cause,
[13:21.120 --> 13:24.200]  he notes whether he released them on bond
[13:24.200 --> 13:26.560]  or remanded them to the jail
[13:26.560 --> 13:29.000]  or released them on their own personal causes.
[13:30.320 --> 13:35.320]  When he finishes that under chapter 16.17 paragraph B,
[13:36.600 --> 13:40.560]  he must forward all of the complaints
[13:40.560 --> 13:43.840]  to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.
[13:43.840 --> 13:48.840]  If the clerk, if the complaint is not filed
[13:48.840 --> 13:52.400]  with the court within 48 hours,
[13:52.400 --> 13:55.880]  the accused has a right to dismissal.
[13:58.240 --> 14:00.280]  That is very clear in law.
[14:01.160 --> 14:06.160]  The magistrate has jurisdiction to hold an examining trial
[14:07.400 --> 14:11.680]  based on a criminal affidavit by some credible person,
[14:11.680 --> 14:14.200]  being a police officer, ordinary citizen,
[14:14.200 --> 14:16.760]  anyone over the 18 never convicted of a felony.
[14:16.760 --> 14:21.360]  Once he receives the verified criminal affidavit,
[14:21.360 --> 14:26.360]  he holds the examining trial that gives him jurisdiction
[14:27.320 --> 14:28.760]  for the examining trial.
[14:29.880 --> 14:32.120]  Once he's held the examining trial,
[14:32.120 --> 14:35.180]  if he finds probable cause,
[14:36.120 --> 14:39.200]  he notices the clerk of the court
[14:39.200 --> 14:42.680]  by forwarding this order to the clerk of the court
[14:42.680 --> 14:44.800]  that he has found probable cause.
[14:44.800 --> 14:47.400]  There's also the piece about
[14:47.400 --> 14:51.280]  if the person who was accused is not there at that point
[14:51.280 --> 14:53.560]  when he's trying to decide about probable cause,
[14:53.560 --> 14:55.880]  if the person is not there to speak for himself,
[14:55.880 --> 14:58.960]  well then he can summon the person to come.
[14:58.960 --> 15:02.960]  Yes, and he can also summon witnesses.
[15:02.960 --> 15:06.040]  He can also delay the examining trial
[15:06.040 --> 15:08.640]  to give the person time to secure counsel
[15:08.640 --> 15:09.880]  if they won't counsel.
[15:09.880 --> 15:12.040]  There's a bunch of things he can do.
[15:12.040 --> 15:17.040]  Once he's done the examining trial, he must issue the order
[15:17.600 --> 15:19.120]  and then he must forward that order
[15:19.120 --> 15:20.720]  to the clerk of the court.
[15:20.720 --> 15:23.120]  I'm speaking here to jurisdiction,
[15:23.120 --> 15:25.980]  how jurisdiction moves through the system.
[15:26.920 --> 15:30.880]  So the magistrate has it based on the complaint.
[15:30.880 --> 15:33.920]  If the magistrate finds probable cause,
[15:33.920 --> 15:37.640]  then he forwards that order to the clerk of the court
[15:37.640 --> 15:39.800]  and that transfers jurisdiction
[15:39.800 --> 15:42.920]  from the magistrate to the court.
[15:42.920 --> 15:44.960]  If that order doesn't hit the court
[15:44.960 --> 15:47.280]  within 48 hours of the examining trial,
[15:47.280 --> 15:52.280]  the accused has a right to dismissal, very clear in the code.
[15:52.760 --> 15:55.680]  Well, I have an information request to the clerk
[15:55.680 --> 15:57.720]  that I got a response saying
[15:57.720 --> 16:00.800]  they have no records responsive to my request.
[16:02.200 --> 16:07.200]  Wow, that means there is no way
[16:07.200 --> 16:10.080]  the court can have jurisdiction.
[16:10.080 --> 16:14.000]  I asked the clerk, how did you manage to create
[16:14.000 --> 16:18.720]  a criminal cause with no criminal accusation?
[16:18.720 --> 16:21.200]  Well, this is just how we do it.
[16:21.200 --> 16:24.960]  Oh, okay, well, that's interesting.
[16:24.960 --> 16:29.960]  So I put in a, I tried to find the criminal affidavit,
[16:30.160 --> 16:32.920]  the statement that must initiate the whole process,
[16:32.920 --> 16:34.880]  but the clerk didn't have it.
[16:34.880 --> 16:36.960]  And when it's prosecuted, the prosecutor didn't have it,
[16:36.960 --> 16:38.400]  said the sheriff had it.
[16:38.400 --> 16:40.440]  So I requested it from the sheriff.
[16:41.400 --> 16:43.360]  And when you get back on the other side,
[16:43.360 --> 16:45.080]  I'll talk about that.
[16:45.080 --> 16:47.760]  It gets real interesting at this point.
[16:47.760 --> 16:49.920]  I'll also turn the phone lines on.
[16:49.920 --> 16:54.600]  I'll call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:54.600 --> 16:57.280]  If you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[16:57.280 --> 16:58.760]  We'll be right back.
[17:03.920 --> 17:06.400]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network,
[17:06.400 --> 17:08.560]  annual fundraiser and gun giveaway,
[17:08.560 --> 17:10.960]  sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[17:10.960 --> 17:14.480]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:14.480 --> 17:16.040]  Any amount is appreciated.
[17:16.040 --> 17:18.120]  Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[17:18.120 --> 17:19.880]  From Central Texas Gun Works,
[17:19.880 --> 17:24.520]  the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[17:24.520 --> 17:27.040]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:27.040 --> 17:30.320]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:30.320 --> 17:33.880]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101,
[17:33.880 --> 17:35.680]  you get four chances to win.
[17:35.680 --> 17:37.640]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar
[17:37.640 --> 17:39.640]  and get 10 chances to win.
[17:39.640 --> 17:42.360]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network,
[17:42.360 --> 17:45.160]  support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you
[17:45.160 --> 17:48.560]  the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[17:48.560 --> 17:51.400]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:51.400 --> 17:55.600]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:55.600 --> 17:59.560]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:01.000 --> 18:03.600]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show
[18:03.600 --> 18:05.560]  to our lineup for the new year.
[18:05.560 --> 18:09.360]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th
[18:09.360 --> 18:11.880]  from 8 to 10 p.m. central time.
[18:11.880 --> 18:14.920]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516.
[18:14.920 --> 18:17.000]  Let your light so shine before men
[18:17.000 --> 18:18.720]  that they may see your good works
[18:18.720 --> 18:21.520]  and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
[18:21.520 --> 18:23.400]  We wish to reflect God's light
[18:23.400 --> 18:26.480]  and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[18:26.480 --> 18:30.000]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies
[18:30.000 --> 18:32.720]  and topical Bible studies designed to provoke
[18:32.720 --> 18:35.040]  unto love and good works.
[18:35.040 --> 18:36.680]  Our verse by verse Bible studies
[18:36.680 --> 18:38.600]  will begin in the book of Matthew
[18:38.600 --> 18:41.200]  where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[18:41.200 --> 18:43.880]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week
[18:43.880 --> 18:45.880]  and we'll explore sound doctrine
[18:45.880 --> 18:48.480]  as well as Christian character development.
[18:48.480 --> 18:50.760]  So mark your calendar and join us live
[18:50.760 --> 18:55.240]  on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[18:55.240 --> 18:57.840]  starting January 8th for an inspiring
[18:57.840 --> 19:00.240]  and motivating discussion of the scriptures.
[19:00.240 --> 19:05.240]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:05.240 --> 19:08.240]  Logosradionetwork.com.
[19:22.240 --> 19:27.240]  Look what we got in the movie of the Christian.
[19:27.240 --> 19:30.240]  I wonder what they are.
[19:30.240 --> 19:33.240]  They don't have answers.
[19:33.240 --> 19:35.240]  They don't have answers.
[19:35.240 --> 19:38.240]  We are the Christian.
[19:38.240 --> 19:40.240]  Look what we got.
[19:40.240 --> 19:43.240]  They don't have answers.
[19:43.240 --> 19:45.240]  So can slip this side.
[19:45.240 --> 19:47.240]  We should proceed on how they want.
[19:47.240 --> 19:49.240]  We can pick it easy.
[19:49.240 --> 19:51.240]  They might talk any too politically.
[19:51.240 --> 19:52.240]  Okay, we are back.
[19:52.240 --> 19:55.240]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio.
[19:55.240 --> 19:57.240]  And the reason I am bringing this up
[19:57.240 --> 20:00.240]  and treating this the way that I am
[20:00.240 --> 20:04.240]  is that we are all out here looking for
[20:04.240 --> 20:09.240]  a remedy to these problems in the legal system.
[20:09.240 --> 20:12.240]  I think we have one.
[20:12.240 --> 20:15.240]  And I have been a long time trying
[20:15.240 --> 20:18.240]  to get all of these things sorted out.
[20:18.240 --> 20:22.240]  I think we have a path.
[20:22.240 --> 20:25.240]  And this will start us down the path.
[20:25.240 --> 20:28.240]  And the path goes to jurisdiction.
[20:28.240 --> 20:33.240]  It has been my consideration from the beginning,
[20:33.240 --> 20:37.240]  from the time I started doing legal research in this area.
[20:37.240 --> 20:39.240]  I very quickly come to the conclusion
[20:39.240 --> 20:43.240]  that what they are doing does not follow
[20:43.240 --> 20:46.240]  what the law says they are supposed to be doing.
[20:46.240 --> 20:50.240]  And in my research I settled on
[20:50.240 --> 20:53.240]  what appeared to be the primary problem,
[20:53.240 --> 20:57.240]  and that is the fact that they don't do an examining trial.
[20:57.240 --> 21:01.240]  And the law specifically commands it.
[21:01.240 --> 21:03.240]  But I have been a long time working out
[21:03.240 --> 21:06.240]  how to go after this problem,
[21:06.240 --> 21:09.240]  how to bring them to the table
[21:09.240 --> 21:12.240]  and force public officials to do it right.
[21:12.240 --> 21:16.240]  Well, I think I have methodology now.
[21:16.240 --> 21:20.240]  And it all goes to this 16-17 order.
[21:20.240 --> 21:27.240]  If there is no 16.17 order in the public record,
[21:27.240 --> 21:31.240]  the court cannot have jurisdiction.
[21:31.240 --> 21:35.240]  Now, in this case, Brett sent an information request
[21:35.240 --> 21:42.240]  to the sheriff asking about training concerning arrest procedures.
[21:42.240 --> 21:47.240]  And got a response that said we have no records responsive to your request.
[21:47.240 --> 21:49.240]  I don't think the sheriff realized
[21:49.240 --> 21:54.240]  that he was throwing everybody, all of his officers under the bus.
[21:54.240 --> 21:57.240]  But that's exactly what he did.
[21:57.240 --> 22:03.240]  So I went in the court record to look at the probable cause statements
[22:03.240 --> 22:10.240]  because when I look in the district court records, I see an indictment.
[22:10.240 --> 22:15.240]  I see a bail form and sometimes I see court appointing counsel,
[22:15.240 --> 22:17.240]  a request for court appointing counsel.
[22:17.240 --> 22:19.240]  That's it.
[22:19.240 --> 22:22.240]  If it's an older case, there's some motions and pleadings.
[22:22.240 --> 22:26.240]  What I don't see is a criminal affidavit.
[22:26.240 --> 22:28.240]  I don't see a criminal complaint.
[22:28.240 --> 22:32.240]  I don't see a statement of probable cause.
[22:32.240 --> 22:35.240]  I've gone to some court clerks and I have seen those things.
[22:35.240 --> 22:39.240]  So I know that at least some people know that they're supposed to be doing that.
[22:39.240 --> 22:40.240]  Yes.
[22:40.240 --> 22:47.240]  When I went to the county court, I found a complaint and an information.
[22:47.240 --> 22:49.240]  So there is a complaint there.
[22:49.240 --> 22:55.240]  It doesn't give me a sufficient statement of probable cause
[22:55.240 --> 23:03.240]  and most of the complaints are filed by Todd, something or other, the same guy.
[23:03.240 --> 23:10.240]  So they give it to one guy in the sheriff's department and he files all of them.
[23:10.240 --> 23:19.240]  So I am going to hammer him big time because he has a statement from an arresting officer
[23:19.240 --> 23:21.240]  and he didn't file that with the court.
[23:21.240 --> 23:26.240]  He secreted it from the court and that's tampering.
[23:26.240 --> 23:35.240]  So for everyone he signed, you know, in lower courts, sometimes especially in traffic court
[23:35.240 --> 23:40.240]  where JPs and such, the officers will bring their complaints to the clerk
[23:40.240 --> 23:45.240]  and the clerk will swear out the complaints.
[23:45.240 --> 23:47.240]  And it's been ruled they can do this.
[23:47.240 --> 23:53.240]  The officer gives the clerk the complaint and the clerk looks at it, reads the affidavit,
[23:53.240 --> 23:57.240]  believes what the officer says and writes a complaint out saying,
[23:57.240 --> 24:05.240]  I have reason to believe and do believe based on a complaint by officer such and such
[24:05.240 --> 24:08.240]  that the following happened.
[24:08.240 --> 24:10.240]  It's the nature of criminal complaints.
[24:10.240 --> 24:11.240]  Anyone can file them.
[24:11.240 --> 24:18.240]  If my neighbor comes to me and says, I saw my next door neighbor kill somebody behind his house
[24:18.240 --> 24:20.240]  but I'm terrified of this guy.
[24:20.240 --> 24:23.240]  And I tell him, well, you need to go to the police.
[24:23.240 --> 24:24.240]  Oh, no, I'm afraid to.
[24:24.240 --> 24:25.240]  I'm not going to the police.
[24:25.240 --> 24:29.240]  He might retaliate against me.
[24:29.240 --> 24:38.240]  Then under Texas law, it's a class A misdemeanor if I don't go to the police.
[24:38.240 --> 24:45.240]  If I have it made known to me that a felony has been committed that invokes a duty on my part under,
[24:45.240 --> 24:50.240]  I think it's 51.138 or 171.
[24:50.240 --> 24:53.240]  Are you familiar with which one that is, Brett?
[24:53.240 --> 24:54.240]  No.
[24:54.240 --> 24:55.240]  Okay, we'll have to look it up.
[24:55.240 --> 25:02.240]  But there's a statute that makes it a class A misdemeanor not to report a felony.
[25:02.240 --> 25:09.240]  So because of that, anyone can report a felony, whether they've personally witnessed it or not.
[25:09.240 --> 25:14.240]  All you must have is reason to believe and do believe.
[25:14.240 --> 25:20.240]  So if someone comes to me and gives me reason to believe based on a statement,
[25:20.240 --> 25:27.240]  and I believe them, now I have reason to believe and do believe and I have a duty to file.
[25:27.240 --> 25:34.240]  So this clerk gets a criminal affidavit from a peace officer whom she trusts
[25:34.240 --> 25:39.240]  and he states to her that he has knowledge that a crime has been committed
[25:39.240 --> 25:43.240]  and if she believes what he says, she is authorized to file the complaint.
[25:43.240 --> 25:44.240]  So they do that.
[25:44.240 --> 25:47.240]  They just got taught something that does that.
[25:47.240 --> 25:51.240]  I did find that in the county court.
[25:51.240 --> 25:54.240]  I did not find that in the district.
[25:54.240 --> 25:56.240]  I didn't find a complaint.
[25:56.240 --> 25:58.240]  I didn't find an information.
[25:58.240 --> 26:04.240]  All I found was an indictment and a bond form.
[26:04.240 --> 26:11.240]  But the bond form, it had the officer's name, but it didn't tell me what department the officer was with.
[26:11.240 --> 26:17.240]  Maybe it was a municipal police officer or a DPS officer.
[26:17.240 --> 26:19.240]  And it didn't give me a badge number.
[26:19.240 --> 26:27.240]  So I could not positively identify the officer for the purpose of a criminal complaint
[26:27.240 --> 26:32.240]  or a TECO complaint, professional conduct complaint.
[26:32.240 --> 26:35.240]  So I needed that information.
[26:35.240 --> 26:42.240]  Now in the county court, there was a document in there that was included.
[26:42.240 --> 26:50.240]  It was sort of a synopsis of the case and it included the officer's name, their department, and their badge number.
[26:50.240 --> 26:54.240]  So I could get everything I needed from the county.
[26:54.240 --> 26:59.240]  There wasn't a probable cause affidavit, but there was a criminal complaint.
[26:59.240 --> 27:03.240]  I had none of that in the district.
[27:03.240 --> 27:11.240]  And the magistrate under 16.17, once he issues that order,
[27:11.240 --> 27:17.240]  he is to, once he makes a determination a probable cause, he is to issue that order.
[27:17.240 --> 27:22.240]  And under 1620, he's to issue, he's to create a warrant.
[27:22.240 --> 27:35.240]  It is the warrant that transfers jurisdiction from the justice of the piece to the magistrate to the court of original jurisdiction.
[27:35.240 --> 27:44.240]  Even if the justice of the piece will be, his court will be the court of original jurisdiction, he still must do this.
[27:44.240 --> 27:49.240]  Because when he's a magistrate, he is not the judge.
[27:49.240 --> 27:57.240]  Then 17.30, the very next chapter states that after the examining trial,
[27:57.240 --> 28:07.240]  the magistrate cell seal all documents had in the hearing cause his name to be written across the seal of the envelope.
[28:07.240 --> 28:17.240]  And this is the only place in Texas law that something is ordered sealed and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.
[28:17.240 --> 28:21.240]  What part of that is hard to understand.
[28:21.240 --> 28:27.240]  This is really, really simple, but they're not doing it.
[28:27.240 --> 28:35.240]  So whoever has this document has it in violation of Texas state law.
[28:35.240 --> 28:44.240]  And if you secret a document from the person or office, it is directed to,
[28:44.240 --> 28:49.240]  that is an act of tampering with a government document.
[28:49.240 --> 28:55.240]  It's a crime under 37.10 Texas penal code.
[28:55.240 --> 29:06.240]  I told the prosecuting attorney, I told him in an earlier email that I was looking forward to introducing him to the deep end of the pool.
[29:06.240 --> 29:10.240]  And in an email, I told him, somebody has these documents.
[29:10.240 --> 29:14.240]  Greg Glowery, the ex district attorney, tells me the sheriff has them.
[29:14.240 --> 29:19.240]  If the sheriff has them, he has them to the exclusion of the district clerk.
[29:19.240 --> 29:23.240]  And that makes each one of those a criminal act.
[29:23.240 --> 29:28.240]  If somebody else has them, then they're committing a criminal act from each one.
[29:28.240 --> 29:31.240]  The magistrate was supposed to send it to the clerk and didn't.
[29:31.240 --> 29:34.240]  That's a crime for each one.
[29:34.240 --> 29:41.240]  So my question to you is, who are you going to file charges against?
[29:41.240 --> 29:48.240]  And then under that, I put, welcome to the deep end of the pool.
[29:48.240 --> 29:53.240]  And I had great fun with that, and we'll speak more to this on the other side.
[29:53.240 --> 29:56.240]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[29:56.240 --> 30:03.240]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:03.240 --> 30:08.240]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets.
[30:08.240 --> 30:12.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details.
[30:12.240 --> 30:14.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:14.240 --> 30:18.240]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:18.240 --> 30:22.240]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:22.240 --> 30:27.240]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:27.240 --> 30:30.240]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:30.240 --> 30:34.240]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:34.240 --> 30:38.240]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:38.240 --> 30:41.240]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:41.240 --> 30:43.240]  Data privacy is a big deal.
[30:43.240 --> 30:48.240]  So nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information.
[30:48.240 --> 30:51.240]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[30:51.240 --> 30:52.240]  It's not an idle question.
[30:52.240 --> 30:57.240]  According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year.
[30:57.240 --> 31:01.240]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com.
[31:01.240 --> 31:05.240]  Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:05.240 --> 31:09.240]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see.
[31:09.240 --> 31:11.240]  The cupboard would be bare.
[31:11.240 --> 31:12.240]  Too bad for you.
[31:12.240 --> 31:18.240]  I've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare.
[31:18.240 --> 31:21.240]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:21.240 --> 31:23.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:23.240 --> 31:46.240]  Here's some news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:54.240 --> 31:55.240]  My uncle.
[31:55.240 --> 31:56.240]  My nephew.
[31:56.240 --> 31:57.240]  My son.
[31:57.240 --> 31:58.240]  Go to buildingwatch.org.
[31:58.240 --> 31:59.240]  Why it fell.
[31:59.240 --> 32:00.240]  Why it matters.
[32:00.240 --> 32:26.240]  You can do it.
[32:30.240 --> 32:58.240]  You can do it.
[32:58.240 --> 33:05.240]  You can do it.
[33:05.240 --> 33:14.240]  You can do it.
[33:14.240 --> 33:39.240]  You can do it.
[33:39.240 --> 33:56.240]  You can do it.
[33:56.240 --> 34:11.240]  You can do it.
[34:11.240 --> 34:12.240]  You can do it.
[34:12.240 --> 34:13.240]  You can do it.
[34:13.240 --> 34:21.240]  You can do it.
[34:21.240 --> 34:30.240]  you can do it.
[34:30.240 --> 34:32.240]  You can do it.
[34:32.240 --> 34:38.240]  You can do it.
[34:38.240 --> 34:46.080]  It would be easier if there were some individual I could single out and
[34:47.020 --> 34:53.080]  demonize beyond all redemption than rail at and righteous indignation. That would be a lot easier.
[34:54.440 --> 34:56.520]  But that's not what I'm finding out there.
[34:57.920 --> 35:03.040]  I'm finding public officials doing the best they can in the situation they're in.
[35:03.040 --> 35:09.360]  And we look at what they're doing and we feel mistreated by them.
[35:09.360 --> 35:13.960]  But every time I talk to these people, for the most part, they want to do the right thing.
[35:15.240 --> 35:21.080]  They just need a way to get it done. And I've recognized this as a problem for a long time.
[35:22.080 --> 35:25.080]  So how do you fix a problem
[35:26.440 --> 35:28.920]  when there really are no bad guys here?
[35:28.920 --> 35:40.160]  When the problem is practices and procedures so ingrained in the system that most of the individuals involved
[35:41.560 --> 35:43.840]  have no idea what they're doing is wrong.
[35:45.360 --> 35:49.840]  They're doing what they've been doing, what they were taught to do, and what they've been doing their whole career.
[35:49.840 --> 35:54.680]  And I came along to Mark Autry, a justice of the peace,
[35:54.680 --> 36:02.680]  whom I have said on the air before, I believe that Mark Autry would do what he thinks is right if it heralypped the Pope.
[36:04.680 --> 36:07.680]  But then that wasn't saying too much because he was a Baptist preacher.
[36:08.680 --> 36:13.680]  So he wasn't too crazy about the Pope, but he really did want to do what he thought was right.
[36:14.680 --> 36:22.680]  And when I walked him through the code, he said to me, Mr. Kelfan, you telling me that in my 20 years as a sheriff's deputy,
[36:22.680 --> 36:29.680]  and his, I think, eight or 12 years at the time as a justice of the peace,
[36:30.680 --> 36:36.680]  that everything I've been doing is wrong and everything everybody else in Texas is doing is wrong and you're right.
[36:37.680 --> 36:42.680]  So don't ask me, Mark. I just bought you the code. There it is. Read it.
[36:43.680 --> 36:50.680]  And he couldn't wrap his head around the fact that what he had been doing all this time could actually be wrong.
[36:50.680 --> 36:56.680]  He had to think that there's something I missed.
[36:57.680 --> 37:01.680]  Everybody couldn't be doing everything wrong.
[37:02.680 --> 37:04.680]  It's hard to wrap your head around.
[37:05.680 --> 37:07.680]  Man, that was the case.
[37:08.680 --> 37:15.680]  He could see it in the code, but he was sure there's just something I can miss and I spend what I've been bumping up against.
[37:15.680 --> 37:21.680]  Otherwise, well-meaning public officials doing what they believe is right, doing what they've been trained to do.
[37:22.680 --> 37:25.680]  I've got a son-in-law who just became a JP.
[37:26.680 --> 37:29.680]  I went through all these codes with him before he got in office.
[37:30.680 --> 37:36.680]  He got in, they trained him in how to do things and he's doing things the way they're telling him to do things.
[37:37.680 --> 37:41.680]  He believes that's right because that's when he was trained.
[37:41.680 --> 37:54.680]  He just spoke to him yesterday and he indicated that he had to follow what the court of the Texas Court of Administrative...
[37:55.680 --> 37:56.680]  Let's see, what is it?
[37:57.680 --> 37:59.680]  What's the administration that oversees the court?
[38:02.680 --> 38:05.680]  Anyway, I'll think of it in a second.
[38:06.680 --> 38:08.680]  Talk about the administrative judicial regions.
[38:08.680 --> 38:12.680]  I think it's the court of judicial administration. I think that's what it is.
[38:13.680 --> 38:14.680]  He said, I have to do what they say.
[38:15.680 --> 38:16.680]  No, you don't.
[38:17.680 --> 38:18.680]  You're an elected official.
[38:20.680 --> 38:26.680]  There's no agency in Texas that tells you what to do and he didn't get that.
[38:26.680 --> 38:38.680]  He kind of knew that, but since he had got in this position and everybody's just walking him down these standard procedures,
[38:39.680 --> 38:43.680]  he was kind of lulled into believing that he had to do everything they told him to do.
[38:44.680 --> 38:47.680]  That's how this problem gets the way it is.
[38:48.680 --> 38:50.680]  No, you are a public official.
[38:51.680 --> 38:53.680]  You are governed by statute and that is all.
[38:53.680 --> 39:02.680]  The governor, the sheriff, other judges, the district judge, the county judge, they don't have anything to say to you about what you do.
[39:03.680 --> 39:09.680]  But they're trained in the way things are done and they do things the way they were trained to do and they seldom question it.
[39:10.680 --> 39:13.680]  And then I come along and question it and they know I must be missing something.
[39:14.680 --> 39:15.680]  So this is what we've got to get over.
[39:16.680 --> 39:17.680]  But I think we have a way to do that.
[39:17.680 --> 39:24.680]  And when I met the new county attorney, frankly, I was impressed with what I saw.
[39:25.680 --> 39:32.680]  Over the years, I'm kind of an old guy and I feel like I got pretty good at reading someone.
[39:33.680 --> 39:37.680]  And I really liked what I saw with this guy.
[39:37.680 --> 39:46.680]  Very confident, not overly confident, but comfortable, relaxed in what he was doing.
[39:47.680 --> 39:49.680]  It's a brand new prosecutor, but he's very relaxed in what he was doing.
[39:50.680 --> 39:53.680]  He was confident in his knowledge and his ability.
[39:54.680 --> 39:56.680]  He didn't appear to have anything to prove.
[39:57.680 --> 39:58.680]  I really like what I saw.
[39:58.680 --> 40:07.680]  Someone I believe he's new enough in the office and demonstrated the problem to him that what I was going to do,
[40:08.680 --> 40:11.680]  I'm going to start filing criminal charges on every one of these arrests.
[40:12.680 --> 40:21.680]  I'm trying to get these records so I can positively identify these officers so that I can file professional conduct complaints against them and criminal complaints against them.
[40:21.680 --> 40:27.680]  And I'm telling you what I'm doing, there's not anything you can do about it.
[40:28.680 --> 40:33.680]  This, this bell zone, go ahead.
[40:34.680 --> 40:36.680]  You typically wouldn't give fair warning.
[40:37.680 --> 40:38.680]  What was the change of heart?
[40:39.680 --> 40:40.680]  That's what I told him.
[40:41.680 --> 40:44.680]  I said, I'm about to violate one of my rules.
[40:45.680 --> 40:49.680]  I have a rule that says never give fair warning.
[40:49.680 --> 40:51.680]  Bushwack is so much better.
[40:52.680 --> 40:55.680]  But in this case, I didn't want to get in a fight with him.
[40:56.680 --> 41:02.680]  I wanted him to understand what I'm doing was not after him and actually not after anybody.
[41:03.680 --> 41:06.680]  I'm not after these officers I'll be filing against.
[41:07.680 --> 41:09.680]  You say, yeah, but that's going to damage their careers.
[41:10.680 --> 41:11.680]  You say, yeah, life is tough.
[41:12.680 --> 41:13.680]  We have to deal with it.
[41:14.680 --> 41:15.680]  These are the parameters I have to work with.
[41:15.680 --> 41:21.680]  So I'm going to start hammering every officer who's made an arrest.
[41:22.680 --> 41:26.680]  And I go for them personally because the sheriff already threw them under the bus.
[41:27.680 --> 41:38.680]  I'm going to say that the officer looked in the code of criminal procedure and yet directed him to take that person directly to the nearest magistrate.
[41:39.680 --> 41:43.680]  But he took it upon himself because he wasn't trained otherwise.
[41:43.680 --> 41:48.680]  To ignore what the law commanded him to do and took him to jail instead.
[41:49.680 --> 41:58.680]  And since he accomplished that act while prominently displaying a deadly weapon under 2202 B2 A and C.
[41:59.680 --> 42:02.680]  That's first degree felon in the state of Texas.
[42:03.680 --> 42:10.680]  So since he used the gun when our legislators put pistols on our police officers hip,
[42:10.680 --> 42:17.680]  they also placed a extremely serious responsibility on them and they made it clear to them,
[42:18.680 --> 42:22.680]  you be really careful of what you do while you're wearing that pistol.
[42:23.680 --> 42:24.680]  And I'll bring that home to them.
[42:25.680 --> 42:26.680]  But that's not the big deal.
[42:27.680 --> 42:29.680]  None of them going to get indicted and I don't want any of them indicted.
[42:30.680 --> 42:33.680]  I just want them to have to face the prospect.
[42:34.680 --> 42:37.680]  What will really hurt them are the profession conduct complaints.
[42:37.680 --> 42:46.680]  Six of those and your bonding agency will increase your bond rating if you keep that officer.
[42:47.680 --> 42:51.680]  And if the officer leaves the sheriff's employee, no one else will hire him.
[42:52.680 --> 42:53.680]  He ends his career.
[42:54.680 --> 42:56.680]  There's nothing they can do about it.
[42:57.680 --> 42:59.680]  The T-Close will throw out all the complaints.
[43:00.680 --> 43:05.680]  We don't care because the bonding agency will count them ballot in ballot doesn't matter.
[43:05.680 --> 43:08.680]  So I will decimate the sheriff's department.
[43:09.680 --> 43:14.680]  I will cause their bond rating to go so high they can't afford to insure officers.
[43:15.680 --> 43:16.680]  There's nothing anybody can do.
[43:17.680 --> 43:19.680]  You've already done this wrong and you can't undo it.
[43:20.680 --> 43:21.680]  But you didn't do it.
[43:22.680 --> 43:23.680]  You weren't here.
[43:24.680 --> 43:25.680]  You were new.
[43:26.680 --> 43:28.680]  And I want you to do it right.
[43:28.680 --> 43:40.680]  And the end of the day, the county judge who was the district attorney pretty well confirmed everything I told him because we've been through this before.
[43:41.680 --> 43:44.680]  And they have both agreed to look into doing examining trials.
[43:45.680 --> 43:49.680]  The pictures are probably one more segment on this when we come back and then we'll start going to our callers.
[43:50.680 --> 43:54.680]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:54.680 --> 43:57.680]  We'll be right back.
[44:24.680 --> 44:28.680]  If you'd like to order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[44:29.680 --> 44:30.680]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.680 --> 44:33.680]  Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[44:34.680 --> 44:36.680]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.680 --> 44:42.680]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.680 --> 44:43.680]  Do I pay extra?
[44:44.680 --> 44:44.680]  No.
[44:45.680 --> 44:46.680]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:47.680 --> 44:47.680]  No.
[44:48.680 --> 44:48.680]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[44:49.680 --> 44:49.680]  No.
[44:50.680 --> 44:50.680]  I mean yes.
[44:50.680 --> 44:54.680]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[44:55.680 --> 44:56.680]  Thank you so much.
[44:57.680 --> 44:57.680]  We are welcome.
[44:58.680 --> 44:59.680]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[45:00.680 --> 45:03.680]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.680 --> 45:14.680]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.680 --> 45:18.680]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.680 --> 45:21.680]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.680 --> 45:26.680]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[45:27.680 --> 45:33.680]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.680 --> 45:42.680]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:42.680 --> 45:51.680]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics and much more.
[45:51.680 --> 46:14.680]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:14.680 --> 46:20.680]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[46:21.680 --> 46:25.680]  If you could not wait anybody too long, would you purposefully die?
[46:26.680 --> 46:31.680]  Love to stand among the soldier or worry your heart's locked, scuffle and they'll keep the peace.
[46:32.680 --> 46:34.680]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding.
[46:35.680 --> 46:39.680]  If somebody calls the police, watch the spotlight.
[46:39.680 --> 46:46.680]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule Our Radio.
[46:47.680 --> 46:56.680]  And because they haven't been following the rules, they have left little gaps in their procedures.
[46:57.680 --> 46:59.680]  Actually not a little gap, this is a big gap.
[47:00.680 --> 47:07.680]  And most of them, most everyone I've talked to did not know 16.17 existed.
[47:07.680 --> 47:16.680]  And when I told this to the county attorney that the accused had a right to dismissal, he went and looked it up.
[47:17.680 --> 47:24.680]  And read it and then stood up for a second, leaned back down, read it again and he said, yeah, that's what it says.
[47:25.680 --> 47:30.680]  And I told him that bell's already been wrong, that 48 hours is over.
[47:31.680 --> 47:33.680]  You can't fix this.
[47:33.680 --> 47:43.680]  Every one of those, every arrest that the county has made under these procedures was illegal and the accused has a right to dismissal.
[47:44.680 --> 47:46.680]  This could devastate the county.
[47:47.680 --> 47:51.680]  And I'm going to be the one to bring this storm.
[47:52.680 --> 47:54.680]  But I don't want you involved in it.
[47:54.680 --> 48:02.680]  I don't want you tainted by it because you didn't have any to do with all this. And that's when we went to solution.
[48:03.680 --> 48:11.680]  And Greg, the now county judge, he didn't have any problem with the examining trial.
[48:12.680 --> 48:15.680]  He told me years ago that he wouldn't have a problem with them at all.
[48:15.680 --> 48:23.680]  If they took people to magistrates first, they would eliminate all the garbage he wouldn't have to mess with.
[48:24.680 --> 48:32.680]  And so he didn't have an objection and we had went through the law about it and he agreed with me what the law said.
[48:33.680 --> 48:35.680]  And I know they talked about it after I left.
[48:36.680 --> 48:43.680]  But at the time they both agreed to look into the possibility of doing examining trials.
[48:43.680 --> 48:52.680]  And then I talked to them about the questionnaires that I'm working with the chief of police in the town I live in to build a questionnaire for police officers.
[48:53.680 --> 49:03.680]  So when they arrest someone, instead of right now to report, they put a headset on, click a button on the computer and it starts asking them questions.
[49:04.680 --> 49:09.680]  They answer the questions and it spits out a report made out correctly.
[49:09.680 --> 49:15.680]  It has every element of the crime in there and the reports are always in the exact same order.
[49:16.680 --> 49:23.680]  So the prosecutor can get one of these reports and he knows exactly what he needs to see in there and exactly where to find it.
[49:24.680 --> 49:25.680]  They like that idea.
[49:26.680 --> 49:31.680]  And a questionnaire for people who ask for court appointed counsel.
[49:31.680 --> 49:40.680]  Before you give them court appointed counsel, you haven't filled out this questionnaire and the purpose of it is to demonstrate that they have remedy.
[49:41.680 --> 49:48.680]  But that the remedy, because your liberty is at stake, is too important for you to try to adjudicate yourself.
[49:49.680 --> 49:50.680]  You're better off with a lawyer.
[49:51.680 --> 49:54.680]  Now you're not better off with a lawyer if you don't know what he's supposed to do.
[49:55.680 --> 49:58.680]  But in this case, you know everything that lawyer is supposed to be doing.
[49:58.680 --> 50:03.680]  So now you're getting a lawyer when you're as knowledgeable as he is.
[50:04.680 --> 50:14.680]  And then you send the audit to all the lawyers that practice in the jurisdiction as a solicitation for representation.
[50:15.680 --> 50:23.680]  But if the guy literally can't afford a lawyer, then we take the report and give it to court appointed counsel for free.
[50:23.680 --> 50:27.680]  And that eliminates that.
[50:28.680 --> 50:32.680]  Biggest thing that people complain about is the lawyer never talks to him.
[50:33.680 --> 50:38.680]  The lawyer knows he doesn't need to because he's going to make a deal.
[50:39.680 --> 50:46.680]  But if he talked to the person and asked them the right questions, he's likely to get leverage he could use to make a better deal.
[50:47.680 --> 50:48.680]  It may even get the whole thing thrown out.
[50:48.680 --> 50:56.680]  And if he takes the affidavit and there's nothing really incriminating it that the guy has said, we'll try to craft it so it doesn't do that.
[50:57.680 --> 51:00.680]  And gives that to the prosecutor and files it in the record.
[51:01.680 --> 51:05.680]  Now he's got exculpatory evidence on the record.
[51:06.680 --> 51:12.680]  Then the prosecutor has something to work with to make the guy a better deal or maybe dismiss the case altogether.
[51:12.680 --> 51:19.680]  Everybody wins here and will give the first set of documents that go with it.
[51:20.680 --> 51:25.680]  This thing will designate what documents are indicated and produce those documents.
[51:26.680 --> 51:29.680]  And for court appointed counsel, we'll give them the first set of documents free.
[51:30.680 --> 51:35.680]  And the judge said, well, if you're going to give them free, how are you going to make any money?
[51:36.680 --> 51:38.680]  And I told him I was going to give them the research repository.
[51:38.680 --> 51:43.680]  I explained that to him and he really liked that one or he seemed to.
[51:44.680 --> 51:46.680]  Then I give that to him free.
[51:47.680 --> 51:54.680]  I didn't have time to explain to Greg how I would make my money, but it just told him what I want to do is sell documents.
[51:55.680 --> 52:00.680]  If I give the research repository to the lawyers for free, that's our questionnaire.
[52:01.680 --> 52:06.680]  And the hardest part about doing legal research is finding cases on point.
[52:06.680 --> 52:15.680]  You go into Westlaw or Lexis or one of these other search engines, you do a keyword search and you get hundreds of hits.
[52:16.680 --> 52:21.680]  You got to go through all these cases to find the ones that are on point.
[52:22.680 --> 52:24.680]  Hardest part about legal research, first case on point.
[52:25.680 --> 52:30.680]  Well, I got this questionnaire here and it's got all the points.
[52:30.680 --> 52:39.680]  So we run an index on the case law and find the case law that goes to the point and we put a link to it at that location.
[52:40.680 --> 52:47.680]  So now instead of looking for the first case on point, you go to the point and we have all the cases linked there.
[52:48.680 --> 52:55.680]  We give that to the lawyers for free and the reason we do that is now it belongs to the lawyers.
[52:55.680 --> 53:03.680]  And if there's any change in law, if there's a new ruling come down, the lawyers will go in there and correct that.
[53:04.680 --> 53:05.680]  They will maintain our database for us.
[53:06.680 --> 53:07.680]  We won't have to.
[53:08.680 --> 53:09.680]  And then we sell them documents.
[53:10.680 --> 53:11.680]  That's where the money is.
[53:12.680 --> 53:16.680]  So this may get this started.
[53:16.680 --> 53:27.680]  And whether you're in Texas or not, all the states have been to do things essentially the same way.
[53:28.680 --> 53:37.680]  All of them have essentially the same due process requirements because those requirements come from federal due process.
[53:38.680 --> 53:44.680]  And examining trial is a primary part of due process in every state.
[53:44.680 --> 53:50.680]  In Texas, they call it examining trial and most other states, they call it a preliminary hearing.
[53:51.680 --> 53:53.680]  We can do this in most any state.
[53:54.680 --> 53:59.680]  What are these states going to do when we start landing on them like a ton of bricks?
[54:01.680 --> 54:03.680]  Their only option is to fix it.
[54:03.680 --> 54:17.680]  And so what we're looking at is after talking to Brett, the law allows for it in the statute that they can do a video appearance before a magistrate.
[54:19.680 --> 54:31.680]  So I think we can set it up so that if an officer arrests someone he can contact a magistrate on the phone or through his own communication system.
[54:31.680 --> 54:35.680]  And do an examining trial right there.
[54:37.680 --> 54:51.680]  The first thing that happens in an examining trial is you accuse, gets advised of his rights, and then that he has a right to make a statement before any evidence is presented to the court against him.
[54:52.680 --> 54:54.680]  He gets to make a statement.
[54:54.680 --> 55:02.680]  The one thing everybody wants is to be heard.
[55:03.680 --> 55:05.680]  And we have a right to be heard.
[55:06.680 --> 55:07.680]  Say that again.
[55:08.680 --> 55:09.680]  And we have a right to be heard.
[55:10.680 --> 55:10.680]  Exactly.
[55:11.680 --> 55:13.680]  And we just want to know they're listening.
[55:14.680 --> 55:16.680]  We want to know that what we have to say is being listened to.
[55:17.680 --> 55:19.680]  And first thing they do is get to do that.
[55:20.680 --> 55:22.680]  You get to put exculpatory evidence on the record.
[55:22.680 --> 55:37.680]  And then once the judge hears what you have to say, listens to what the officer has to say and makes a determination, whether he rules in your favor or not, you're not going to feel so oppressed.
[55:38.680 --> 55:44.680]  You're not going to feel as though they're ganging up against you because the magistrates are really pretty well in neutral party.
[55:45.680 --> 55:49.680]  That's what the examining trial was intended for from the beginning.
[55:49.680 --> 55:51.680]  They can do this quickly.
[55:51.680 --> 55:52.680]  They're on the side of the road.
[55:52.680 --> 55:55.680]  If the judge says, well, officer, you don't have enough.
[55:56.680 --> 56:00.680]  So I'm going to find no problem because you got to let him go.
[56:01.680 --> 56:07.680]  That says he's taking the guy to jail, looking him in, holding him overnight, going through all this real world.
[56:09.680 --> 56:12.680]  If he sets bail.
[56:12.680 --> 56:19.680]  Well, if the guy has bail money, he can give it to the officers allowed to take it.
[56:20.680 --> 56:26.680]  If he doesn't, then contact the bail bondsman and the officer can take him directly to the bail bondsman.
[56:27.680 --> 56:28.680]  The bail bondsman said he's bail.
[56:29.680 --> 56:30.680]  They can release him.
[56:30.680 --> 56:31.680]  He doesn't have to go to jail.
[56:33.680 --> 56:36.680]  Save the Sheriff's Department a lot of money.
[56:36.680 --> 56:54.680]  He'll get that 15.17 order in the record, get them straight with due process and get their order, the 16, 17 order on the record.
[56:54.680 --> 57:07.680]  And it'll also give the accused an opportunity to put in exculpatory evidence that gives the prosecutor and the defense lawyer more to work with in making a better deal.
[57:08.680 --> 57:10.680]  Everybody wins here.
[57:11.680 --> 57:15.680]  And I suspect any state we go to, you can do the same thing.
[57:15.680 --> 57:21.680]  So if you're in another state, other in Texas, look at due process closely.
[57:21.680 --> 57:27.680]  What are the officers required to do when they make a arrest and are they doing that?
[57:28.680 --> 57:37.680]  It's my position that the most important thing for us to bring back to eliminate this mass incarceration phenomenon is the examining trial.
[57:38.680 --> 57:41.680]  And we're going to see if we can get that done.
[57:42.680 --> 57:43.680]  I think we're on the right road.
[57:43.680 --> 57:51.680]  And also what I'm going to include with what I'm building, I'm going to file a lawsuit against the county.
[57:52.680 --> 57:58.680]  And I'm going to turn that lawsuit into a fill in the blanks and put in a questionnaire that'll ask you for the information.
[57:59.680 --> 58:08.680]  It'll fill in the blanks, spit you out criminal complaints, professional conduct complaints, tort letter, lawsuit, everything.
[58:08.680 --> 58:12.680]  We start unloading them, they'll get their due process straight.
[58:13.680 --> 58:15.680]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Felton.
[58:16.680 --> 58:17.680]  When we come back, we're going to go to our callers.
[58:18.680 --> 58:22.680]  Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:23.680 --> 58:25.680]  And this is the top of our break.
[58:26.680 --> 58:28.680]  It's a good time to check out our sponsors.
[58:29.680 --> 58:31.680]  We don't ask for donations often.
[58:32.680 --> 58:36.680]  We need donations a lot more often than we ask for them.
[58:36.680 --> 58:47.680]  So if you find what we present of value, go to Logos Radio Network and drop us 5 or 10 bucks, something so we can keep our infrastructure together.
[58:48.680 --> 58:49.680]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.680 --> 58:52.680]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:53.680 --> 58:57.680]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.680 --> 59:05.680]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.680 --> 59:08.680]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.680 --> 59:16.680]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:16.680 --> 59:26.680]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.680 --> 59:31.680]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:31.680 --> 59:46.680]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.680 --> 59:49.680]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:52.680 --> 59:58.680]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[59:58.680 --> 01:00:03.680]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:04.680 --> 01:00:19.680]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:19.680 --> 01:00:30.680]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $227.26,
[01:00:31.680 --> 01:00:40.680]  XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:40.680 --> 01:00:58.680]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and injuring 40.
[01:00:59.680 --> 01:01:00.680]  Today in history.
[01:01:00.680 --> 01:01:13.680]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hemp into taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio,
[01:01:14.680 --> 01:01:23.680]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:01:23.680 --> 01:01:32.680]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:33.680 --> 01:01:46.680]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works,
[01:01:46.680 --> 01:02:00.680]  as well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.680 --> 01:02:12.680]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:12.680 --> 01:02:17.680]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:02:21.680 --> 01:02:26.680]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark.
[01:02:26.680 --> 01:02:38.680]  As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:38.680 --> 01:02:44.680]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins.
[01:02:44.680 --> 01:02:50.680]  For the purpose, it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:50.680 --> 01:03:06.680]  This is Ruth Rody with the lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:20.680 --> 01:03:42.680]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Carlson, Brett Fountain, the rule of law radio, and we're going to go to David in Texas. Hello, David.
[01:03:42.680 --> 01:04:05.680]  Hi, Randy. Yeah, under the federal district court lawsuit that I have here, I got something back on this when they told me that I have a problem with filing a private suit in the federal court.
[01:04:05.680 --> 01:04:12.680]  And if I file too many times, I'm going to lose my filing private suit without.
[01:04:12.680 --> 01:04:25.680]  So the one that sent me back, the complaint on the judicial misconduct or disability, this guy here took it in and was the court executive.
[01:04:25.680 --> 01:04:42.680]  He's an attorney. So in those times, the court, the offensive circuit has an attorney for a court of court check.
[01:04:42.680 --> 01:04:57.680]  Anyway, then I read, I got the thing back here now from the judge itself on the complaint file under the judicial conduct disability act for 2015-164.
[01:04:57.680 --> 01:05:13.680]  And what he told me is that he dismissed the complaint. He said it was frivolous. So, you know, I had no case there.
[01:05:13.680 --> 01:05:31.680]  But wait a minute, wait, wait a minute. A complaint cannot be frivolous. A complaint can be insufficient, but it can't be frivolous.
[01:05:31.680 --> 01:05:40.680]  What they're trying to do is set up three frivolous rulings so they can declare you a vexatious litigant.
[01:05:40.680 --> 01:05:48.680]  So you sent the complaint. Who did you send the complaint to?
[01:05:48.680 --> 01:06:01.680]  Well, I addressed it to the circuit. But the thing was, I've been looking to the complaint in case law on judicial conduct and federal court.
[01:06:01.680 --> 01:06:15.680]  Wait, wait, wait. Let me make sure I'm in the right place. When you're saying complaint, you're saying judicial conduct complaint, not criminal complaint. Am I correct?
[01:06:15.680 --> 01:06:32.680]  I'm going to say, when I sent my name, I filled the complaint out on the complaint form, complaint of judicial misconduct disability. Now, they have a whole set of rules on that.
[01:06:32.680 --> 01:06:46.680]  They have to be somewhat rules. The one that they hinge on is rule six. Now, what I did is I sent that in, and then I put the criminal complaint.
[01:06:46.680 --> 01:07:03.680]  I sent the file of criminal complaint, but filled out the criminal complaint, and I put on the criminal complaint, and then I listed all of the vexatious violations on it.
[01:07:03.680 --> 01:07:10.680]  Now, maybe I should have put them in separate envelopes because I ran across this problem before.
[01:07:10.680 --> 01:07:20.680]  Now, I thought, even if the Court of Court was a lawyer, they would know more what's going on than the regular Court of Court.
[01:07:20.680 --> 01:07:30.680]  The regular Court of Court is something they hired through somebody's relatives, and they spit them in there, and a lot of them don't know what the heck's going on.
[01:07:30.680 --> 01:07:40.680]  But I listed, you know, like, on my criminal complaint, and then I put an affidavit with it, all the listings, and there were, like, about eight of them.
[01:07:40.680 --> 01:07:48.680]  You know, like, campers, public documents, co-conspiracy, official oppression and all that stuff.
[01:07:48.680 --> 01:08:01.680]  So, they, the Court of Court said that he, that this law, he would get back to me on it.
[01:08:01.680 --> 01:08:07.680]  But the way he worded it, he said, this is all his administration, and I was brought off the chair.
[01:08:07.680 --> 01:08:22.680]  Now, how could the criminal complaint fall under the administration post? But he did not type in the listings on it where it says,
[01:08:22.680 --> 01:08:38.680]  the complaint of judicial conduct for disability. So, as I say, the way he worded it, now that I've researched it, what he's doing was, I look in the Ninth Circuit, I look in the Other Circuit,
[01:08:38.680 --> 01:08:50.680]  and I found a lot of these complainants reduced from the conduct. They're all listed under there, and it seems like all the judges, when they got one of these complaints filed in the Court,
[01:08:50.680 --> 01:09:03.680]  they always dismissed them for the same price. But the thing that I found is that, when they filed these, nobody ever mentioned that they filed a criminal complaint against the judge,
[01:09:03.680 --> 01:09:17.680]  or the Court, or either. So, what I did was, now I got a blank complaint from the District of Columbia Circuit Court.
[01:09:17.680 --> 01:09:25.680]  Now, they only give you two hits on that. Like, they told me here, you filed a petition to complain.
[01:09:25.680 --> 01:09:35.680]  So, they judge, they dismiss the Municipal Council on the Circuit. Now, it says that a positional review must be filed in this office before it's made.
[01:09:35.680 --> 01:09:53.680]  And you only get, you can only file, now when I file this, this will be my second, my review. After that, and be right here, that it will be a final judgment.
[01:09:53.680 --> 01:10:05.680]  Now, if he issues a final judgment on this, can I take this and go to the District of Court, of Columbia Court, that next highest court in file,
[01:10:05.680 --> 01:10:24.680]  or would it be a good idea to file it now, and overlook this Third Circuit judge here, and leave him out, just bypass him, you know, so he doesn't have a beef with me later.
[01:10:24.680 --> 01:10:36.680]  What do you think? Are you still there?
[01:10:36.680 --> 01:10:46.680]  Yes, somebody renewed my mic when I wasn't looking. I'm having a little trouble understanding all of this. I'm not getting all the fine detail.
[01:10:46.680 --> 01:11:02.680]  You are filing criminal complaints along with judicial conduct complaints, and they denied judicial conduct complaints, and you're wanting to know where to appeal that.
[01:11:02.680 --> 01:11:18.680]  Correct?
[01:11:18.680 --> 01:11:39.680]  Well, have you read the rules of appellate procedure as it applies to judicial conduct complaints, or is there a different set of rules for judicial conduct complaints than for any other kind of complaint?
[01:11:39.680 --> 01:11:56.680]  There are several rules that's titled complaint of judicial misconduct or disability, that's like fifty-fifty of them, and the one that hinges would be rule six.
[01:11:56.680 --> 01:12:16.680]  And what does it say?
[01:12:16.680 --> 01:12:31.680]  No, I don't know what the laws say. You're giving me the codes, but this is not my area of research, so what do those codes essentially say?
[01:12:31.680 --> 01:12:46.680]  Pretty much like the rest of them, you know, like the rules.
[01:12:46.680 --> 01:12:59.680]  On an appeal from a judicial conduct complaint, where do the rules direct the appeal?
[01:12:59.680 --> 01:13:27.680]  Right now I'm feeling I went up to the circuit court because there's where the, not the application, but the complaint form said that, like I said, this word should be completed and melt in your public address of the circuit executive.
[01:13:27.680 --> 01:13:52.680]  In that circuit executive of the lawyer, they don't pick anybody out of the crowd to be a court or court. They don't court from the, they court, this executive, court for the eight or nine judges there.
[01:13:52.680 --> 01:13:57.680]  There's more down in the district than, like, eighteen of them.
[01:13:57.680 --> 01:14:14.680]  Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute. I never did get my question answered. What do the rules say about where an appeal from a ruling on a judicial conduct complaint is filed?
[01:14:14.680 --> 01:14:21.680]  Well, I can tell you that. It goes to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
[01:14:21.680 --> 01:14:23.680]  Oh, wow.
[01:14:23.680 --> 01:14:32.680]  Well, he didn't get filed in the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for a second, but he has to file with the court.
[01:14:32.680 --> 01:14:39.680]  He doesn't, the court handles the judge's patience when he gets it.
[01:14:39.680 --> 01:14:55.680]  You're saying the clerk. What does that mean? Are you talking about the clerk of courts? Are you talking about some clerk for a separate judge? What office does it go to?
[01:14:55.680 --> 01:15:02.680]  Clearly appeals do not go to clerks. They have to go to some office or official.
[01:15:02.680 --> 01:15:12.680]  Brett, will you explain the appeal to the Supreme Chief Justice of the Supreme?
[01:15:12.680 --> 01:15:30.680]  Yeah, it says the Commission on Judicial Conduct is, it says that the judge may appeal the sanction if they get within 30 days when the Judicial Conduct Commission issues a sanction.
[01:15:30.680 --> 01:15:45.680]  The judge may appeal the sanction by filing a written request, Chief Justice of the Supreme, requesting the appointment of three appellate justices to act as a special quarter of review.
[01:15:45.680 --> 01:15:56.680]  So the Chief Justice, and that's who he would go to, and then the three appellate justices would do this special quarter of review.
[01:15:56.680 --> 01:16:17.680]  Does it address a Judicial Conduct complaint that does not result in sanctions against the judge? Does the filer have standing to appeal, and if they do, to whom would they file the appeal?
[01:16:17.680 --> 01:16:25.680]  It does not say.
[01:16:25.680 --> 01:16:44.680]  So David, it looks like if it doesn't say, you just kind of have to figure that out, or is there an appeal for a decision dismissing your Judicial Conduct complaint? Is there anything that addresses that?
[01:16:44.680 --> 01:16:59.680]  Okay, hang on. Go on to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rula Blah Radio. We'll be right back.
[01:17:14.680 --> 01:17:34.680]  Our lights so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[01:17:34.680 --> 01:17:47.680]  Verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week. Our topical Bible studies will vary each week, and we'll explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development.
[01:17:47.680 --> 01:18:00.680]  So mark your calendar and join us live on bogulseradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8 for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.680 --> 01:18:17.680]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works. Go to LogosRadionetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated. Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[01:18:17.680 --> 01:18:35.680]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win. When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:18:35.680 --> 01:18:48.680]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get ten chances to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[01:18:48.680 --> 01:19:00.680]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to LogosRadionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:19:00.680 --> 01:19:10.680]  Logos Radio Network
[01:19:30.680 --> 01:19:51.680]  You ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. I was blindsided but now I can see your eyes. You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my head. Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:51.680 --> 01:20:01.680]  You ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:20:22.680 --> 01:20:50.680]  So yeah, I found it. It says upon reviewable matters, a complainant or subject judge may petition the committee for review of a judicial counsel order entered in accordance with all these other rules.
[01:20:50.680 --> 01:21:09.680]  So either one, the judge competition for review or the complainant can. And this is in, let's see here, that's Rule 21. It says guide to judiciary policy. This is off of UScourts.gov.
[01:21:09.680 --> 01:21:31.680]  And it's under Section 320 rules for judicial conduct and judicial disability proceedings. And Rule 21 is speaking to this issue of the committee on judicial conduct and disability and who can petition them and for what?
[01:21:31.680 --> 01:21:36.680]  Okay, that's petitioning to the same commission that rendered the ruling?
[01:21:36.680 --> 01:21:38.680]  Yes.
[01:21:38.680 --> 01:21:49.680]  What about the one you mentioned earlier where the judge could petition the Chief Justice of the Supreme to appoint a commission?
[01:21:49.680 --> 01:21:52.680]  We find where that is in this code.
[01:21:52.680 --> 01:22:06.680]  That would be great. Whether you get, whether the Chief Justice does what you want him to or not, you get to bring a local judge before the Chief Justice in black his eye.
[01:22:06.680 --> 01:22:17.680]  You put a mark on his chart. So the next time that judge's name comes up in the Supreme's, oh yeah, that's the guy. I know who he is.
[01:22:17.680 --> 01:22:23.680]  Okay. David, have you looked through those rules?
[01:22:23.680 --> 01:22:36.680]  Yeah, but because it's the Supreme, it's got to go to John Robinson. It's got to go to his court.
[01:22:36.680 --> 01:22:44.680]  But before that, you have to go to the District of Columbia Circuit.
[01:22:44.680 --> 01:23:00.680]  And I was going to take my review and send it there and bypass the circuit judge. Now, as I said, I looked through all the cases that, the only he's involved with all of them.
[01:23:00.680 --> 01:23:11.680]  They just go right down the list for like a year. And it always takes the same thing. It's dismissed. It's frivolous and they dismiss it.
[01:23:11.680 --> 01:23:18.680]  So that's what they do all the time with these cases whenever a judge is brought in on the park.
[01:23:18.680 --> 01:23:22.680]  They just simply dismiss it and hope the guy goes away.
[01:23:22.680 --> 01:23:26.680]  It's funny that it all starts out with complaint.
[01:23:26.680 --> 01:23:33.680]  Prozay has filed a complaint. He never says an attorney. How is that?
[01:23:33.680 --> 01:23:36.680]  Brett, can you understand him? I'm having trouble.
[01:23:36.680 --> 01:23:40.680]  I'm not. I missed it. It's got really fuzzy there.
[01:23:40.680 --> 01:23:44.680]  Can you say that again? It sounds like you're a long way away from the microphone.
[01:23:44.680 --> 01:23:52.680]  So your voice is kind of hollow and I'm having trouble figuring out what you're saying.
[01:23:52.680 --> 01:24:05.680]  At least you get your counsel complaint. They always start off when the guy files the complaint. They're always prozay.
[01:24:05.680 --> 01:24:07.680]  Yes.
[01:24:07.680 --> 01:24:10.680]  They're never a lawyer.
[01:24:10.680 --> 01:24:19.680]  Oh, a lawyer wouldn't dare file a judicial conduct complaint against a judge. That would be professional suicide.
[01:24:19.680 --> 01:24:22.680]  Isn't that a bias, though?
[01:24:22.680 --> 01:24:29.680]  Yeah, of course it's a bias. Lawyers are terrified of judges.
[01:24:29.680 --> 01:24:37.680]  You can actually use that against a lawyer. If you don't like him, you can bring up the fact that a lawyer, in his own professional ethics rules,
[01:24:37.680 --> 01:24:44.680]  he has a duty to call out a judge and report him to the judicial misconduct.
[01:24:44.680 --> 01:24:53.680]  He's filed a complaint. The lawyer has a duty if he has knowledge that the judge is in violation.
[01:24:53.680 --> 01:25:00.680]  So you can hammer the lawyer on the other side as well as the judge.
[01:25:00.680 --> 01:25:08.680]  Yeah, for not correcting the judge. You bargained with the other lawyer for not correcting the judge.
[01:25:08.680 --> 01:25:14.680]  They don't tend to like that, but that's the rules.
[01:25:14.680 --> 01:25:23.680]  Okay, so I'm trying to figure out where you're at, David, and we're having a little trouble understanding you.
[01:25:23.680 --> 01:25:33.680]  So now you've had your complaint dismissed. They're claiming it's frivolous.
[01:25:33.680 --> 01:25:37.680]  What is your next step?
[01:25:37.680 --> 01:25:47.680]  Well, they even told me that I filed my cross-stay lawsuit in their federal court.
[01:25:47.680 --> 01:25:51.680]  And their point is?
[01:25:51.680 --> 01:25:54.680]  I shouldn't be doing that.
[01:25:54.680 --> 01:26:02.680]  Oh, shame on you. Did they claim that your lawsuits were all dismissed as frivolous?
[01:26:02.680 --> 01:26:15.680]  Yeah, they only ever gave me one lawsuit, but that was after, you know, I filed a conduct complaint and a frivolous complaint.
[01:26:15.680 --> 01:26:24.680]  They sent that all back and dismissed all that. They dismissed the frivolous complaint, and now I'm sitting here working on this conduct.
[01:26:24.680 --> 01:26:35.680]  And if I get this conduct complaint straightened out, and for a figured out, I'm going to file against this person's judge criminally,
[01:26:35.680 --> 01:26:42.680]  because there's four or five laws here in Ebro that I have on my list.
[01:26:42.680 --> 01:26:45.680]  First of all, there's your president, right?
[01:26:45.680 --> 01:26:47.680]  Okay.
[01:26:47.680 --> 01:26:54.680]  He's conspiring with the district judge downstairs.
[01:26:54.680 --> 01:27:05.680]  I am sorry. I'm having a terrible time understanding, and I've even got my hearing aids in.
[01:27:05.680 --> 01:27:13.680]  Also, the public with a document.
[01:27:13.680 --> 01:27:20.680]  Can you try calling back in? I'm not able to understand what you're saying.
[01:27:20.680 --> 01:27:29.680]  Well, look, I'm going to call you the law then. You guys can look this up.
[01:27:29.680 --> 01:27:35.680]  I'm just hearing a lot of noise.
[01:27:35.680 --> 01:27:39.680]  Can you send me this in an email?
[01:27:39.680 --> 01:27:46.680]  Send me the good case to look up. Do you know who Grant Kavanaugh is?
[01:27:46.680 --> 01:27:49.680]  Supreme Court Justice.
[01:27:49.680 --> 01:27:52.680]  Oh, Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh, yes.
[01:27:52.680 --> 01:28:05.680]  Okay. Look his case up. There's 82 filing on that, against him.
[01:28:05.680 --> 01:28:07.680]  Got it?
[01:28:07.680 --> 01:28:10.680]  That's interesting.
[01:28:10.680 --> 01:28:16.680]  Can a Supreme Court judge be removed for bad behavior?
[01:28:16.680 --> 01:28:21.680]  I know a federal judge is a federal judge as long as he's in good behavior,
[01:28:21.680 --> 01:28:26.680]  but I don't think it says that about a Supreme Court judge.
[01:28:26.680 --> 01:28:43.680]  The judge is right here and says, if you still complain, the number went Kavanaugh, and the guy has 33 complaints.
[01:28:43.680 --> 01:28:55.680]  Yeah, but if he's a Supreme Court Justice, it probably doesn't make any difference to him
[01:28:55.680 --> 01:28:59.680]  because he can't be removed.
[01:28:59.680 --> 01:29:02.680]  Well, we're only the same.
[01:29:02.680 --> 01:29:05.680]  You know who the people are?
[01:29:05.680 --> 01:29:10.680]  I am sorry, David. I cannot understand you.
[01:29:10.680 --> 01:29:17.680]  But look, his case up, and you'll start digging into this like how tomorrow,
[01:29:17.680 --> 01:29:21.680]  and you'll find that all the circuit courts,
[01:29:21.680 --> 01:29:28.680]  they will always rule the same way. Each one, I must have looked up 50 of them today.
[01:29:28.680 --> 01:29:35.680]  So all of this mess, frivolous?
[01:29:35.680 --> 01:29:39.680]  I'm sorry, I can't answer. I can't understand what you're saying.
[01:29:39.680 --> 01:29:44.680]  I'm getting bits and pieces. Can you try calling back?
[01:29:44.680 --> 01:29:49.680]  Come on, bro.
[01:29:49.680 --> 01:29:57.680]  Okay, I'm sorry, David. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[01:29:57.680 --> 01:30:00.680]  Bye!
[01:30:00.680 --> 01:30:09.680]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:30:09.680 --> 01:30:12.680]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:12.680 --> 01:30:16.680]  I'm Dr. Kaepernald Brecht. Back with details in a moment.
[01:30:16.680 --> 01:30:22.680]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.680 --> 01:30:27.680]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.680 --> 01:30:32.680]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.680 --> 01:30:38.680]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.680 --> 01:30:42.680]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.680 --> 01:30:45.680]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.680 --> 01:30:48.680]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:48.680 --> 01:30:52.680]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart.
[01:30:52.680 --> 01:30:56.680]  But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:30:56.680 --> 01:31:00.680]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:31:00.680 --> 01:31:03.680]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:03.680 --> 01:31:10.680]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed-out people have less grey matter in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:10.680 --> 01:31:15.680]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:15.680 --> 01:31:20.680]  So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:20.680 --> 01:31:26.680]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.680 --> 01:31:36.680]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.680 --> 01:31:41.680]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded
[01:31:41.680 --> 01:31:43.680]  it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.680 --> 01:31:46.680]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.680 --> 01:31:48.680]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.680 --> 01:31:50.680]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.680 --> 01:31:51.680]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.680 --> 01:31:52.680]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.680 --> 01:31:53.680]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.680 --> 01:31:55.680]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.680 --> 01:31:57.680]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.680 --> 01:32:01.680]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.680 --> 01:32:06.680]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:06.680 --> 01:32:08.680]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[01:32:08.680 --> 01:32:10.680]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.680 --> 01:32:13.680]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.680 --> 01:32:16.680]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:16.680 --> 01:32:18.680]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:18.680 --> 01:32:20.680]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.680 --> 01:32:24.680]  The traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce
[01:32:24.680 --> 01:32:26.680]  and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.680 --> 01:32:29.680]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.680 --> 01:32:32.680]  brings together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:32.680 --> 01:32:34.680]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.680 --> 01:32:36.680]  and how to hold courts to the Rule of Law.
[01:32:36.680 --> 01:32:38.680]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:38.680 --> 01:32:41.680]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.680 --> 01:32:43.680]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:43.680 --> 01:32:46.680]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:46.680 --> 01:32:48.680]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:48.680 --> 01:32:51.680]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.680 --> 01:32:55.680]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.680 --> 01:32:59.680]  With your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:26.680 --> 01:33:28.680]  Anywhere you go, computer ready.
[01:33:28.680 --> 01:33:30.680]  You can hide me if I'm nobody.
[01:33:30.680 --> 01:33:33.680]  Let me say, check in on your mom, check in on your daddy,
[01:33:33.680 --> 01:33:36.680]  check in on your grandpa and your granny.
[01:33:36.680 --> 01:33:38.680]  Check in on me, check in on your baby,
[01:33:38.680 --> 01:33:40.680]  check in on your family, whole family.
[01:33:40.680 --> 01:33:43.680]  Check in on your dad and they kept around me.
[01:33:43.680 --> 01:33:45.680]  Check in on the beef and you still got E.T.
[01:33:45.680 --> 01:33:48.680]  Check in on the fish, them all in the sea.
[01:33:48.680 --> 01:33:50.680]  Check in on the shark and the real around me.
[01:33:50.680 --> 01:33:52.680]  You don't see mankind going crazy.
[01:33:52.680 --> 01:33:55.680]  Take the clinic room and they want to repeat.
[01:33:55.680 --> 01:33:57.680]  Social security, they can tell me.
[01:33:57.680 --> 01:34:00.680]  Number will they give me, then repeat obviously.
[01:34:00.680 --> 01:34:02.680]  I'm chippy when the morning, chippy when the evening,
[01:34:02.680 --> 01:34:04.680]  chippy when the night.
[01:34:04.680 --> 01:34:08.680]  Experiment on mankind.
[01:34:08.680 --> 01:34:10.680]  Okay, we are back.
[01:34:10.680 --> 01:34:13.680]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:13.680 --> 01:34:15.680]  And we're going to Joseph in Texas.
[01:34:15.680 --> 01:34:16.680]  Hello, Joseph.
[01:34:16.680 --> 01:34:23.680]  What do you have for us today?
[01:34:23.680 --> 01:34:27.680]  Hello, Joseph.
[01:34:27.680 --> 01:34:31.680]  You might check see if your mic is muted.
[01:34:31.680 --> 01:34:34.680]  I am not hearing you.
[01:34:34.680 --> 01:34:38.680]  If your mic's not muted, try hanging up and calling us back.
[01:34:38.680 --> 01:34:41.680]  Okay, well I'm sorry about that here.
[01:34:41.680 --> 01:34:43.680]  You hear me now?
[01:34:43.680 --> 01:34:45.680]  I can hear you now.
[01:34:45.680 --> 01:34:48.680]  All right, well I'm just talking about being quite distraught.
[01:34:48.680 --> 01:34:51.680]  You know, y'all talking about using an examining crowd,
[01:34:51.680 --> 01:34:54.680]  having all these cases overturned.
[01:34:54.680 --> 01:34:59.680]  But I challenge anyone to show me a single conviction in Texas
[01:34:59.680 --> 01:35:01.680]  that is not void.
[01:35:01.680 --> 01:35:06.680]  I tell you know, because I don't believe there been
[01:35:06.680 --> 01:35:12.680]  a single conviction that the court had jurisdiction.
[01:35:12.680 --> 01:35:17.680]  You know, I've read court ruling anytime due process is violated
[01:35:17.680 --> 01:35:23.680]  that removes jurisdiction if the court had jurisdiction to start with.
[01:35:23.680 --> 01:35:28.680]  You are definitely speaking to the gallery here.
[01:35:28.680 --> 01:35:31.680]  Well, yeah, but I mean, you know, from what I got earlier,
[01:35:31.680 --> 01:35:33.680]  you're talking like y'all are trying to find some way
[01:35:33.680 --> 01:35:37.680]  to get all these convictions overturned.
[01:35:37.680 --> 01:35:41.680]  But like I said, from what I understand, you know.
[01:35:41.680 --> 01:35:44.680]  Okay, Joe, it's not enough to go in there
[01:35:44.680 --> 01:35:46.680]  and say you guys are violating law.
[01:35:46.680 --> 01:35:49.680]  Didn't I say, okay, we don't care.
[01:35:49.680 --> 01:35:51.680]  What do you do?
[01:35:51.680 --> 01:35:55.680]  You know, I've been fatiguing myself right,
[01:35:55.680 --> 01:35:58.680]  just trying to figure it out.
[01:35:58.680 --> 01:36:01.680]  Start filing judicial conduct complaints,
[01:36:01.680 --> 01:36:05.680]  far grievances, professional conduct complaints against the officers.
[01:36:05.680 --> 01:36:07.680]  That's how to do it.
[01:36:07.680 --> 01:36:10.680]  Forget the law, the law don't matter.
[01:36:10.680 --> 01:36:12.680]  It's politics.
[01:36:12.680 --> 01:36:17.680]  And the politics of professional conduct complaints goes to money.
[01:36:17.680 --> 01:36:21.680]  And when you raise their bond rating to the so high they can't pay it,
[01:36:21.680 --> 01:36:25.680]  when you start filing professional conduct complaints against the officers
[01:36:25.680 --> 01:36:28.680]  and they wind up quitting in the droves
[01:36:28.680 --> 01:36:31.680]  and the jurisdiction can't hire anybody to work for them,
[01:36:31.680 --> 01:36:34.680]  then we get their attention.
[01:36:34.680 --> 01:36:41.680]  But just bringing the law to them, they do not care.
[01:36:41.680 --> 01:36:43.680]  Well, you have to tell them, you know,
[01:36:43.680 --> 01:36:45.680]  if they can hold this and that,
[01:36:45.680 --> 01:36:47.680]  but like you said, they don't care what the law is,
[01:36:47.680 --> 01:36:53.680]  they're just going to rubber-stab, go on hold it.
[01:36:53.680 --> 01:36:59.680]  Yeah, but when you start filing criminally against them with grand juries,
[01:36:59.680 --> 01:37:02.680]  grand juries are not something that's under control.
[01:37:02.680 --> 01:37:07.680]  And then when you start getting their insurance rating pushed through the roof,
[01:37:07.680 --> 01:37:12.680]  you start getting peace officers who can't be peace officers
[01:37:12.680 --> 01:37:15.680]  because they got too many professional conduct complaints,
[01:37:15.680 --> 01:37:19.680]  now you get their attention.
[01:37:19.680 --> 01:37:21.680]  Consider the county I'm in.
[01:37:21.680 --> 01:37:26.680]  What's going to happen when I start filing against every deputy
[01:37:26.680 --> 01:37:33.680]  who makes an arrest in accordance with the requirements of the county sheriff's department?
[01:37:33.680 --> 01:37:35.680]  He does what he's supposed to.
[01:37:35.680 --> 01:37:40.680]  I hammer him big time.
[01:37:40.680 --> 01:37:43.680]  But the sheriff can't hire deputies.
[01:37:43.680 --> 01:37:45.680]  And even if he could hire deputies,
[01:37:45.680 --> 01:37:49.680]  he can't afford to get his bond insurance,
[01:37:49.680 --> 01:37:53.680]  they're going to have to do something.
[01:37:53.680 --> 01:37:59.680]  If I just go in and accuse them of violating the law, heck, they don't care.
[01:37:59.680 --> 01:38:03.680]  Well, that's what I told them, you know, by court.
[01:38:03.680 --> 01:38:06.680]  You know, the court does not make a valid ruling,
[01:38:06.680 --> 01:38:11.680]  you know, like I said, you know, I challenge the warden when I used to work at the prison,
[01:38:11.680 --> 01:38:18.680]  show me anyone serving time upon a valid conviction.
[01:38:18.680 --> 01:38:20.680]  Yeah, we got that.
[01:38:20.680 --> 01:38:32.680]  So every arrest, I can show you 19 misdemeanor and felony crimes by everyone involved in their arrest.
[01:38:32.680 --> 01:38:35.680]  We have a reason, I guess right now, the way I know you're talking about it,
[01:38:35.680 --> 01:38:39.680]  like you're trying to figure out how to use examining trial.
[01:38:39.680 --> 01:38:46.680]  Well, like I said, I think there's so many different ways, different violations they commit
[01:38:46.680 --> 01:38:51.680]  that really, you know, like you're immune.
[01:38:51.680 --> 01:38:53.680]  Okay, yeah, we got that.
[01:38:53.680 --> 01:38:56.680]  Where are we going to start, Joe?
[01:38:56.680 --> 01:39:01.680]  We've got to start somewhere to put a wedge under here.
[01:39:01.680 --> 01:39:05.680]  How are we going to get them under control just by complaining because they're not following law?
[01:39:05.680 --> 01:39:07.680]  Heck, they don't care.
[01:39:07.680 --> 01:39:09.680]  We've been doing that for 30 years.
[01:39:09.680 --> 01:39:20.680]  Okay, what division makes the court don't care?
[01:39:20.680 --> 01:39:26.680]  If they're going to rule however they want to, don't care what you say.
[01:39:26.680 --> 01:39:31.680]  How are we going to fix it?
[01:39:31.680 --> 01:39:34.680]  I've been trying to figure out for years.
[01:39:34.680 --> 01:39:37.680]  Okay, start filing professional conduct complaints.
[01:39:37.680 --> 01:39:40.680]  Start bar-grieving lawyers.
[01:39:40.680 --> 01:39:50.680]  In this process, when I find a lawyer who's court appointed and the lawyer hasn't moved to dismiss the case
[01:39:50.680 --> 01:39:55.680]  for lack of jurisdiction, I'm going to bar-grieve him.
[01:39:55.680 --> 01:39:59.680]  Those lawyers are crap, they're drawers.
[01:39:59.680 --> 01:40:07.680]  And then, before long, no one will want to represent a client in Wise County
[01:40:07.680 --> 01:40:16.680]  because his countenance OB is going to bar-grieve him unless they file a motion to dismiss with the court
[01:40:16.680 --> 01:40:20.680]  and then the court is stuck with it.
[01:40:20.680 --> 01:40:23.680]  It's all about the money.
[01:40:23.680 --> 01:40:28.680]  So we've got to get in their pockets.
[01:40:28.680 --> 01:40:31.680]  Well, then I get back to what I've been trying to figure out.
[01:40:31.680 --> 01:40:33.680]  How do you take the civil fraction?
[01:40:33.680 --> 01:40:37.680]  Let me go to 104, state liability for public service behavior.
[01:40:37.680 --> 01:40:46.680]  104.003 up to $300,000 for deprivation of a right privilege or immunity.
[01:40:46.680 --> 01:40:48.680]  Yes.
[01:40:48.680 --> 01:40:53.680]  So one of the things I'm doing, I'm constructing a lawsuit.
[01:40:53.680 --> 01:41:01.680]  Right now, I'm setting up how to get to the lawsuit, how to get all the pieces in place.
[01:41:01.680 --> 01:41:03.680]  I pretty well got all of those.
[01:41:03.680 --> 01:41:05.680]  Now I'll build a tort letter.
[01:41:05.680 --> 01:41:07.680]  I have most of that already built.
[01:41:07.680 --> 01:41:10.680]  And then I'll build a criminal complaint.
[01:41:10.680 --> 01:41:15.680]  Once I've been through this process, then I'll build a questionnaire.
[01:41:15.680 --> 01:41:23.680]  A questionnaire to develop the information that I need to build all these documents.
[01:41:23.680 --> 01:41:30.680]  So we will ask you, did you file an information request to the county clerk for this information?
[01:41:30.680 --> 01:41:39.680]  If they say no, boom, the system spits out the request and then automate all of this.
[01:41:39.680 --> 01:41:44.680]  So every person they arrest can wind up suing them.
[01:41:44.680 --> 01:41:52.680]  When they get sued on every bad arrest, they'll have to fix that.
[01:41:52.680 --> 01:41:56.680]  Yeah.
[01:41:56.680 --> 01:42:00.680]  They use low down rotten, dirty tricks against us.
[01:42:00.680 --> 01:42:02.680]  Let's do the same thing.
[01:42:02.680 --> 01:42:07.680]  Let's take it to them.
[01:42:07.680 --> 01:42:09.680]  Take one to them.
[01:42:09.680 --> 01:42:11.680]  Take the law to them.
[01:42:11.680 --> 01:42:13.680]  Take the civil law to them.
[01:42:13.680 --> 01:42:16.680]  Get in their pockets.
[01:42:16.680 --> 01:42:18.680]  Professional conduct complaints.
[01:42:18.680 --> 01:42:20.680]  Scott Richardson is calling in.
[01:42:20.680 --> 01:42:21.680]  He was filing those.
[01:42:21.680 --> 01:42:28.680]  Every time he filed one against a deputy, the next time he went to court, the deputy was no longer with the office.
[01:42:28.680 --> 01:42:32.680]  He had left.
[01:42:32.680 --> 01:42:37.680]  Because they know how dangerous these things are to their career.
[01:42:37.680 --> 01:42:55.680]  Well, I think I cut off the court ruling. I've read in the past couple of days about how the sheriff and the police officers are liable to you if you're done wrong.
[01:42:55.680 --> 01:43:05.680]  And I look like a real interesting case, but I'm pretty sure they've been any interesting cases. It's just kind of like what good are they?
[01:43:05.680 --> 01:43:09.680]  Well, here's how. You're exactly right.
[01:43:09.680 --> 01:43:11.680]  Well, they're good if you file a suit.
[01:43:11.680 --> 01:43:19.680]  The problem with filing a suit, Joe, do you know how to file a suit?
[01:43:19.680 --> 01:43:23.680]  Right. For the most part, we don't know how to file suits.
[01:43:23.680 --> 01:43:35.680]  I don't want to answer the goal when I won, but I didn't get anything out of it. I claimed he was poking next to my son. He was riding a brand new car, but he was too broke to pay me.
[01:43:35.680 --> 01:43:38.680]  And the court made him get away with it. The sheriff made him get away with it.
[01:43:38.680 --> 01:43:41.680]  Did you sue the court and the sheriff?
[01:43:41.680 --> 01:43:43.680]  Yeah.
[01:43:43.680 --> 01:43:49.680]  We start taking them to task. We'll get this changed.
[01:43:49.680 --> 01:43:59.680]  And I'm working out how to do that. Hang on. We're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Louisville Law Radio. We'll be right back.
[01:43:59.680 --> 01:44:04.680]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[01:44:04.680 --> 01:44:08.680]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris proven method.
[01:44:08.680 --> 01:44:20.680]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:44:20.680 --> 01:44:26.680]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:44:26.680 --> 01:44:28.680]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[01:44:28.680 --> 01:44:33.680]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:44:33.680 --> 01:44:40.680]  The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.680 --> 01:44:49.680]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.680 --> 01:45:00.680]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[01:45:00.680 --> 01:45:03.680]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.680 --> 01:45:14.680]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, debt-by-step.
[01:45:14.680 --> 01:45:18.680]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.680 --> 01:45:22.680]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.680 --> 01:45:27.680]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.680 --> 01:45:33.680]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.680 --> 01:45:42.680]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.680 --> 01:45:51.680]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.680 --> 01:46:00.680]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:22.680 --> 01:46:30.680]  Something in this world I'll never understand, something I realize fully
[01:46:30.680 --> 01:46:39.680]  Somebody's on a police, that police man, somebody's on a police, a police
[01:46:39.680 --> 01:46:44.680]  There's always a room at the top of the hill
[01:46:44.680 --> 01:47:01.680]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking on this Thursday, the fourth day of February 2021, and we're talking to Joe in Texas.
[01:47:01.680 --> 01:47:08.680]  Joe, over time in doing this show, I had your same frustration.
[01:47:08.680 --> 01:47:12.680]  We're trying to use the law, and it's just not getting the city for it.
[01:47:12.680 --> 01:47:16.680]  It wasn't until I started looking at the politics.
[01:47:16.680 --> 01:47:21.680]  How do we get in the individual's pocket?
[01:47:21.680 --> 01:47:30.680]  And it turns out, bar grievances, judicial conduct complaints, and TECO complaints.
[01:47:30.680 --> 01:47:38.680]  TECO complaints turned out to be a really big deal.
[01:47:38.680 --> 01:47:53.680]  I had a guy file a TECO complaint against an officer, and the sheriff came from 25 miles away, drove to this guy's house to talk to him, to ask him why he filed the TECO complaint.
[01:47:53.680 --> 01:48:01.680]  When Tim told me about that, I thought, Sheriff, you should not play poker.
[01:48:01.680 --> 01:48:11.680]  If it gets the sheriff to drive 25 miles to keep that from happening again, we got there a week under belly.
[01:48:11.680 --> 01:48:20.680]  I was talking about me going into court and showing all this mess, but I think I told you the past.
[01:48:20.680 --> 01:48:26.680]  I just can't go to court anymore, do I have to go to the metal detector?
[01:48:26.680 --> 01:48:34.680]  I mean, I think I go stay out in the woods as often as I can, because the longer I stay in town, my health goes down.
[01:48:34.680 --> 01:48:47.680]  So I feel like I got to get out, cut down on this toxic rich environment as much as I can, get my health up, come back into town, and then I get down real quick.
[01:48:47.680 --> 01:49:00.680]  You may be there right now with COVID, they don't want to really see you in court. You can do everything electronically.
[01:49:00.680 --> 01:49:13.680]  You don't have to go to the metal detectors. You don't have to go in that toxic environment.
[01:49:13.680 --> 01:49:21.680]  But you must try to get some of that paperwork from you and try to concentrate on doing it like you're suggested.
[01:49:21.680 --> 01:49:25.680]  Just try to dirty their water up more or less, I guess.
[01:49:25.680 --> 01:49:39.680]  When I go into court, when I go to the courthouse, everybody there thinks that my only purpose there is to get them to do something so I get a reason to file a complaint against them.
[01:49:39.680 --> 01:49:46.680]  And they're right. I am. So just go ahead and mess with me.
[01:49:46.680 --> 01:49:52.680]  We'll see how that works out for you. And if we're going to get them under control, that's how we're going to do it.
[01:49:52.680 --> 01:49:57.680]  And besides, Joe, you won't believe how much fun this is.
[01:49:57.680 --> 01:50:05.680]  Send me an email. I've got a P-Cole complaint on my traffic ticket website.
[01:50:05.680 --> 01:50:10.680]  It's in the form of a PDF, a fill in the blanks PDF.
[01:50:10.680 --> 01:50:19.680]  You call it up and just fill in the blanks, hit print, or hit save to a file, and you can download it.
[01:50:19.680 --> 01:50:25.680]  What is your traffic website?
[01:50:25.680 --> 01:50:30.680]  I don't have a link. It's trafficticket.website.
[01:50:30.680 --> 01:50:35.680]  But I don't have a link on there to this document. It's on there.
[01:50:35.680 --> 01:50:40.680]  I'll have to call up the document and get the URL and send you the URL.
[01:50:40.680 --> 01:50:46.680]  Next time I work on it, I'll put a hyperlink to it.
[01:50:46.680 --> 01:50:49.680]  So send me an email. I'll send you the link to it.
[01:50:49.680 --> 01:50:53.680]  And if anybody else wants to send me an email, I'll send that to you.
[01:50:53.680 --> 01:50:59.680]  As soon as I get time to get back on the traffic ticket site, I will put a hyperlink to that.
[01:50:59.680 --> 01:51:02.680]  Appreciate it.
[01:51:02.680 --> 01:51:04.680]  Okay. Thank you, Joe.
[01:51:04.680 --> 01:51:08.680]  Okay. Now we're going to John in New York. Hello, John.
[01:51:08.680 --> 01:51:11.680]  Hello, John. How are you?
[01:51:11.680 --> 01:51:18.680]  I am good. What do you have for us today?
[01:51:18.680 --> 01:51:29.680]  You wanted me to do a summary tonight on the entire situation with COVID and so on and so forth.
[01:51:29.680 --> 01:51:33.680]  Do a quick overview tonight and then call in tomorrow and I'll call in early.
[01:51:33.680 --> 01:51:37.680]  I'd like to take you early on this.
[01:51:37.680 --> 01:51:41.680]  Okay. Hold on. I got a little kitty on my stomach here.
[01:51:41.680 --> 01:51:44.680]  Okay. I got to get up, sweetie. I got to get up.
[01:51:44.680 --> 01:51:49.680]  Okay. I got to get up, baby. I just woke her up. Get on the chair.
[01:51:49.680 --> 01:51:53.680]  Okay. Stay right there. Stay right there, baby.
[01:51:53.680 --> 01:51:56.680]  Here we go.
[01:51:56.680 --> 01:52:01.680]  Let's see if I still got the phone call on. Okay. Yep. You're still on.
[01:52:01.680 --> 01:52:08.680]  All right. Here we go.
[01:52:08.680 --> 01:52:12.680]  This whole COVID-19 thing is nothing but a fraud.
[01:52:12.680 --> 01:52:15.680]  I mean, it's a real virus and it does kill some people,
[01:52:15.680 --> 01:52:20.680]  but it's been hopped up and hooked up in every other way.
[01:52:20.680 --> 01:52:27.680]  Any way you can think that they have cheated and lied and stolen, they have.
[01:52:27.680 --> 01:52:32.680]  And I'll just leave that as a general opener.
[01:52:32.680 --> 01:52:40.680]  The same number of people in 2020, in 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015,
[01:52:40.680 --> 01:52:44.680]  basically the same number of people have died each year.
[01:52:44.680 --> 01:52:49.680]  All there's a few differences here and there, but it's pretty constant.
[01:52:49.680 --> 01:52:56.680]  And yet the number of flu cases has almost, have almost disappeared.
[01:52:56.680 --> 01:52:59.680]  They're sort of, they're going to a flat line.
[01:52:59.680 --> 01:53:04.680]  What they're doing is they're taking car deaths, gunshot wounds,
[01:53:04.680 --> 01:53:10.680]  drownings, cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and they're figuring them in to COVID.
[01:53:10.680 --> 01:53:14.680]  But the total number of people that have died is the same.
[01:53:14.680 --> 01:53:17.680]  That's a dead giveaway that they're cooking the numbers.
[01:53:17.680 --> 01:53:26.680]  Okay. Everybody's intelligent enough to know what that is. I can move on.
[01:53:26.680 --> 01:53:39.680]  The COVID survival rate is somewhere between 99.99% and 99.8% or 89%.
[01:53:39.680 --> 01:53:46.680]  Most people seem to think it's about 99.99% when you add in all the figures.
[01:53:46.680 --> 01:53:49.680]  In other words, there's a very low death toll.
[01:53:49.680 --> 01:53:52.680]  Now that doesn't mean that it's okay.
[01:53:52.680 --> 01:53:55.680]  One person dying is too many.
[01:53:55.680 --> 01:54:00.680]  But what I'm trying to say is they over, over, over exaggerate it.
[01:54:00.680 --> 01:54:06.680]  And at one point they were using 15 times the number of people with COVID.
[01:54:06.680 --> 01:54:13.680]  In other words, if one person had it, they would say 15 times the number of people had it.
[01:54:13.680 --> 01:54:15.680]  That's a lot.
[01:54:15.680 --> 01:54:16.680]  Some different facts.
[01:54:16.680 --> 01:54:21.680]  Australia had to quit giving out the vaccine.
[01:54:21.680 --> 01:54:33.680]  Australia had to quit giving the COVID vaccine because too many people were coming up HIV positive after they got the vaccine.
[01:54:33.680 --> 01:54:34.680]  You heard that right.
[01:54:34.680 --> 01:54:36.680]  They were coming up HIV positive.
[01:54:36.680 --> 01:54:43.680]  Now the medical authorities claim that that was just false positive.
[01:54:43.680 --> 01:54:46.680]  Believe me, I don't want to find out.
[01:54:46.680 --> 01:54:48.680]  And I don't think it was just false positives.
[01:54:48.680 --> 01:54:53.680]  There's a reason for that and I can get into that tomorrow night.
[01:54:53.680 --> 01:54:57.680]  Merck said their two vaccines don't work.
[01:54:57.680 --> 01:54:59.680]  I'll say that again.
[01:54:59.680 --> 01:55:08.680]  Merck, the company that makes vaccines, they said their two vaccines for COVID do not work.
[01:55:08.680 --> 01:55:12.680]  And they pulled them back from the market.
[01:55:12.680 --> 01:55:21.680]  The United Kingdom, they had so many people with convulsions, with seizures, with convulsions.
[01:55:21.680 --> 01:55:22.680]  Some of them died.
[01:55:22.680 --> 01:55:35.680]  There were so many people that got deathly sick that at one point the UK, I think it was England, they pulled the vaccine from being given out.
[01:55:35.680 --> 01:55:42.680]  Now, I don't know if they have gone back to giving it or not, I didn't look that up.
[01:55:42.680 --> 01:55:50.680]  There are so many authorities that say that the vaccine does not protect you.
[01:55:50.680 --> 01:55:52.680]  That is a fact.
[01:55:52.680 --> 01:56:02.680]  It will protect you against symptoms a little bit, but it won't stop you from spreading the virus and it won't stop you from getting the virus.
[01:56:02.680 --> 01:56:06.680]  What's the point? This whole thing is engineered, manufactured.
[01:56:06.680 --> 01:56:08.680]  It's a political ploy.
[01:56:08.680 --> 01:56:10.680]  Everybody knows it.
[01:56:10.680 --> 01:56:11.680]  Different facts.
[01:56:11.680 --> 01:56:12.680]  Here we go.
[01:56:12.680 --> 01:56:25.680]  The FDA itself, the FDA no less, they say that it causes heart attacks, strokes, and anaphylactic shock.
[01:56:25.680 --> 01:56:32.680]  The FDA that protects the drug manufacturers has actually admitted it.
[01:56:32.680 --> 01:56:38.680]  That's like asking the fox to guard the hen house and then turning him into an officer of the law.
[01:56:38.680 --> 01:56:50.680]  When the FDA admits something like that, boy, that's a major, major thing because there is dirty as the day is long and that's a fact.
[01:56:50.680 --> 01:56:55.680]  The vaccine, let's see, they stopped a bad reaction.
[01:56:55.680 --> 01:56:58.680]  CBS News got caught with their pants down.
[01:56:58.680 --> 01:57:06.680]  I don't know if you know who Project Veritas is, V-E-R-I-T-A-S, Veritas.
[01:57:06.680 --> 01:57:08.680]  Yes, I'm familiar with that.
[01:57:08.680 --> 01:57:09.680]  In Latin.
[01:57:09.680 --> 01:57:12.680]  They go undercover and they expose fraud.
[01:57:12.680 --> 01:57:27.680]  Well, CBS News was in the middle of a fraud. They had a long line, they were reporting the story, and there was a long line of people supposedly waiting to get their COVID-19 tests at this one hospital.
[01:57:27.680 --> 01:57:30.680]  And this is not the only isolated case.
[01:57:30.680 --> 01:57:32.680]  This has happened all over the country.
[01:57:32.680 --> 01:57:43.680]  Project Veritas went in and they interviewed without them knowing it. They asked and they found out that they were like 50 to 100 people waiting online.
[01:57:43.680 --> 01:57:45.680]  I don't remember the exact number.
[01:57:45.680 --> 01:57:53.680]  And they were all hospital employees that were told to go out there and make it look like everybody was getting a COVID test.
[01:57:53.680 --> 01:57:59.680]  And so Project Veritas asked them, how many people are really online here to get a COVID test?
[01:57:59.680 --> 01:58:00.680]  Two.
[01:58:00.680 --> 01:58:08.680]  Out of the 50 or 100, they were employees and they got them to admit it about six times on tape.
[01:58:08.680 --> 01:58:13.680]  This whole thing is doctors. The doctors have reported coercion.
[01:58:13.680 --> 01:58:19.680]  The doctors have been forced to write COVID on the death certificate when they know it's not COVID.
[01:58:19.680 --> 01:58:22.680]  And their licenses are threatened if they don't do that.
[01:58:22.680 --> 01:58:30.680]  Yes. Okay. We're out of time. My nephew and his wife are positions and they will confirm that.
[01:58:30.680 --> 01:58:32.680]  Let's do one tomorrow night.
[01:58:32.680 --> 01:58:39.680]  But instead of making these general statements, see if you can give us some facts to back it up so we can support it.
[01:58:39.680 --> 01:58:42.680]  Thank you, John, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain.
[01:58:42.680 --> 01:58:45.680]  We'll be back tomorrow night.
[01:58:45.680 --> 01:58:49.680]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:49.680 --> 01:58:57.680]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.680 --> 01:59:04.680]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse,
[01:59:04.680 --> 01:59:08.680]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.680 --> 01:59:11.680]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.680 --> 01:59:20.680]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.680 --> 01:59:29.680]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.680 --> 01:59:32.680]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.680 --> 01:59:40.680]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.680 --> 01:59:49.680]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.