ROL_2020-12-10_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.520]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.520 --> 00:29.960]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.960 --> 00:41.520]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $1.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.520 --> 00:52.400]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:57.760]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing
[00:57.760 --> 01:04.760]  10 and entering 40 today in history.
[01:04.760 --> 01:09.440]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hemp into
[01:09.440 --> 01:14.120]  Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin
[01:14.120 --> 01:18.080]  and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:18.080 --> 01:22.720]  new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment
[01:22.720 --> 01:24.720]  to test the herb for THC.
[01:24.720 --> 01:28.440]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:28.440 --> 01:33.040]  she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.040 --> 01:34.040]  law.
[01:34.040 --> 01:37.600]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.600 --> 01:42.080]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.080 --> 01:48.280]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.280 --> 01:51.240]  well as other cities too like the District Attorney.
[01:51.240 --> 01:57.280]  In El Paso, Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law quote
[01:57.280 --> 02:01.760]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.760 --> 02:06.760]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.760 --> 02:10.760]  in Harris County who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.760 --> 02:13.480]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.480 --> 02:17.400]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.400 --> 02:22.600]  charged with.
[02:22.600 --> 02:27.240]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[02:27.240 --> 02:32.360]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.360 --> 02:38.040]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.040 --> 02:39.040]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.040 --> 02:43.800]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:43.800 --> 02:50.080]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.080 --> 03:16.080]  glow.
[03:16.080 --> 03:41.840]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark ever
[03:41.840 --> 04:11.640]  captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the Gulf of Mexico.
[04:11.640 --> 04:33.600]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark ever
[04:33.600 --> 04:41.600]  captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the Gulf of Mexico.
[04:41.600 --> 04:48.600]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark ever
[04:48.600 --> 04:57.920]  captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the Gulf of Mexico.
[04:57.920 --> 05:14.880]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark ever
[05:14.880 --> 05:25.720]  captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the Gulf of Mexico.
[05:25.720 --> 05:35.440]  I did a lot of engineering and estimating to get the brush to spin at the right speed
[05:35.440 --> 05:43.160]  and then I put an electric motor that I guessed based on my experience would be the right
[05:43.160 --> 05:49.560]  size to pull it and fired that thing up and it run exactly the way I wanted it to.
[05:49.560 --> 05:58.320]  So yes I'm going to have to do a minor I got to take it all apart and change some brushes.
[05:58.320 --> 06:02.720]  You know you shouldn't use a torch around those things those brushes really catch on
[06:02.720 --> 06:10.240]  fire easy and once they catch on fire up inside that housing they are a beast to put out.
[06:10.240 --> 06:16.560]  I came home and my wife said what are those little black spots all over your face.
[06:16.560 --> 06:23.520]  I thought that was odd I washed my face they were melted something it was spots of melted
[06:23.520 --> 06:33.240]  plastic I had to peel them off that got excited but it wasn't as bad as the last time I caught
[06:33.240 --> 06:40.920]  one on fire that one was a lot worse so anyway my sweepers up and cooking and I am very happy
[06:40.920 --> 06:50.280]  about that another another thing occurred someone sent me a document and that document
[06:50.280 --> 07:01.320]  I'm trying to bring it up now was a lawsuit written by our illustrious attorney general
[07:01.320 --> 07:11.720]  and whatever you may think of him my estimation of him just went up major big time I was very
[07:11.720 --> 07:20.320]  proud of him about that when you when I talk about you know in the 101 I talk I've got
[07:20.320 --> 07:27.520]  a section there on how to build legal documents and I have a section on rules and in the rules
[07:27.520 --> 07:38.880]  I talk about never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth and when you
[07:38.880 --> 07:47.120]  build a legal document look at your document and see if there is a place where you create
[07:47.120 --> 07:54.000]  a question in the mind of your reader that you didn't answer it's okay to create a question
[07:54.000 --> 07:58.840]  in the mind of your reader but you're going to have to answer it and pretty quick and
[07:58.840 --> 08:04.720]  that works well because it creates a sense of rapport if I'm talking to you and I say
[08:04.720 --> 08:09.760]  something that creates a question and in a sentence or two later while you're sitting
[08:09.760 --> 08:16.360]  there wondering about that question then I answer it and give you closure and that gives
[08:16.360 --> 08:21.480]  a feeling of rapport so that works real good to do that on purpose you don't ever want
[08:21.480 --> 08:29.720]  to do it by mistake I read and you want your document to be something that a eighth grader
[08:29.720 --> 08:38.320]  can read through one time and understand this document in the Supreme Court of the United
[08:38.320 --> 08:44.720]  States the state of Texas v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania state of Georgia state of Michigan
[08:44.720 --> 08:55.000]  and state of Wisconsin this document is one of those documents this is case in point this
[08:55.000 --> 09:02.240]  is how it should be done if anybody wants this document someone send it to send it to
[09:02.240 --> 09:10.960]  me and I could I was amazed at what I saw here I did a show with pastor master on the
[09:10.960 --> 09:16.240]  Thursday night and last time a show I did he was talking about all the garbage it was
[09:16.240 --> 09:21.320]  going on I told him I was really depressed I told him before the show I'm going to try
[09:21.320 --> 09:27.480]  not to let you depress me tonight but you're going to depress me and he did I'm not depressed
[09:27.480 --> 09:40.200]  anymore so you read this Brett oh this is a beautiful piece of work they start out with
[09:40.200 --> 09:49.960]  the underlying law primarily the elections clause of the Constitution and what the document
[09:49.960 --> 10:01.280]  says is the federal Constitution authorizes the United States legislature and the legislatures
[10:01.280 --> 10:13.800]  of the several states to prescribe voting practices and only the United States legislature
[10:13.800 --> 10:21.840]  and the legislatures of the several states may do this it excludes all of the agencies
[10:21.840 --> 10:31.680]  within those states and then they go through then they make the argument that these states
[10:31.680 --> 10:42.440]  did not follow the procedures set by their own legislature and by so doing they put
[10:42.440 --> 10:49.640]  the election at risk in their state and by putting the election at risk in their state
[10:49.640 --> 10:58.120]  they diluted the effect of the election in each of the other states therefore it was
[10:58.120 --> 11:09.840]  unconstitutional and that gave the state of Texas footing or standing to raise this issue
[11:09.840 --> 11:22.800]  well since this was 517 other states have joined and I only have one criticism if it's
[11:22.800 --> 11:29.640]  a criticism he may know something I don't and that's in his prayer in his prayer he
[11:29.640 --> 11:42.720]  asks the supreme to order the states either not to elect electors or if they've already
[11:42.720 --> 11:49.320]  elected electors to what they do is they take all the vote and they turn that into electors
[11:49.320 --> 11:55.920]  for each section and they appoint these electors he asked the supreme to order them not to
[11:55.920 --> 12:06.440]  do that first he asked for a stay electors are all by law supposed to be put in place
[12:06.440 --> 12:16.880]  by the 14th of December they ask for a stay because that particular restriction is not
[12:16.880 --> 12:24.280]  in constitution it's in subsequent legislation and it is open for adjustment it's not a constitutional
[12:24.280 --> 12:33.000]  provision the January 20th is a constitutional provision so they can't ask scotus to change
[12:33.000 --> 12:41.720]  that or to delay it so he asked them not to appoint to order these states not to appoint
[12:41.720 --> 12:52.160]  electors or if they have to not that he to render their votes as void status quo on
[12:52.160 --> 13:00.000]  tape I think it's a problem with that that would have the effect of disenfranchising
[13:00.000 --> 13:09.640]  all of the voters of those states and I can't see the supreme court doing that now what
[13:09.640 --> 13:17.840]  what they could have done and what the supreme can still do is simply declare that these
[13:17.840 --> 13:29.440]  practices listed in this document render the election suspect to fraud and declare the
[13:29.440 --> 13:43.560]  election unreliable and send the election to the Senate to the house in Senate and the
[13:43.560 --> 13:52.160]  calculation is if they do that Trump will win by some 17 votes each state will get one
[13:52.160 --> 13:58.480]  vote there was a question the first I had heard that the senators get to vote but that's
[13:58.480 --> 14:06.560]  not the case and I'm not sure exactly how that works but every state gets one vote and
[14:06.560 --> 14:13.520]  if they did that then they would not disenfranchise any of the voters directly all voters in
[14:13.520 --> 14:21.760]  all states would be treated equally and then if scotis does something that's kind of what
[14:21.760 --> 14:28.440]  I expect them to do but that was the only criticism if I had one if you read this document you
[14:28.440 --> 14:34.760]  will fully understand what they're talking about and it's a pretty much of a pattern
[14:34.760 --> 14:42.160]  across all of the state states they took the largest democratic strongholds and that's
[14:42.160 --> 14:55.280]  generally the largest cities and the individual directors of agencies related to voting adopted
[14:55.280 --> 15:02.400]  to drop certain requirements for instance on writing votes a requirement that they be
[15:02.400 --> 15:08.320]  verified and that the signature on each one be verified apparently they're on a right
[15:08.320 --> 15:17.440]  and there must be a signature on the envelope itself and they decided that they would do
[15:17.440 --> 15:27.120]  away with that and then they had a straw entity sue them for it and then they go into court
[15:27.120 --> 15:33.160]  and make a deal in the court where the judge rules that yes you can do this so now the
[15:33.160 --> 15:43.680]  individual actors have a court ruling saying they can do this while sneaky yes and so they
[15:43.680 --> 15:50.440]  challenged them on it but regardless of what the court says the court is not allowed by
[15:50.440 --> 16:00.280]  constitution to set these laws the court is not allowed to eliminate laws and what's
[16:00.280 --> 16:08.080]  it lost the term there to abolish laws you as you get old you'll have the same problem
[16:08.080 --> 16:15.440]  I'm taking zinc and it helped my memory so much I don't really remember the last time
[16:15.440 --> 16:24.880]  I forgot something except I forgot to order zinc oh well anyway they didn't allow you
[16:24.880 --> 16:31.760]  one of these rulings were clearly in direct violation of the stated intent of the code
[16:31.760 --> 16:41.160]  so that was the basic mechanism and basically we're about to fall off the cliff Randy Kelton
[16:41.160 --> 16:47.640]  Brett Fouton rule of law radio we'll be right can you see the clock I can't work out 15
[16:47.640 --> 16:54.840]  seconds oh okay oh there it is I have to go to my JavaScript then okay I got it and
[16:54.840 --> 17:06.200]  the gentleman Brett Fouton rule of law radio we'll be right it's the 2019 logos radio network
[17:06.200 --> 17:12.960]  annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by central Texas gunworks go to logosradionetwork.com
[17:12.960 --> 17:18.200]  and enter to win any amount is appreciated everything helps to keep us on the air from
[17:18.200 --> 17:25.080]  central Texas gunworks the grand prize up for grabs is a spikes tactical AR 15 more prizes
[17:25.080 --> 17:31.200]  and sponsors to be announced every $25 donation is a chance to win when you purchase Randy
[17:31.200 --> 17:37.520]  Kelton's ebook legal 101 you get four chances to win purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar
[17:37.520 --> 17:42.800]  and get 10 chances to win if you've enjoyed the shows on logos radio network support our
[17:42.800 --> 17:48.480]  fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today
[17:48.480 --> 17:54.640]  we also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and remember every $25 donation is a chance
[17:54.640 --> 18:02.800]  to win go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today logos radio network welcomes
[18:02.800 --> 18:08.120]  a new show to our lineup for the new year scripture talk with Nana will begin Wednesday
[18:08.120 --> 18:15.120]  January 8 from 8 to 10 p.m. central time our goal is in accord with Matthew 5 16 let your
[18:15.120 --> 18:20.200]  light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your father which
[18:20.200 --> 18:25.440]  is in heaven we wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing
[18:25.440 --> 18:31.400]  ear join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies
[18:31.400 --> 18:37.080]  designed to provoke onto love and good works our verse by verse Bible studies will begin
[18:37.080 --> 18:42.480]  the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week our topical Bible studies
[18:42.480 --> 18:48.360]  will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development
[18:48.360 --> 18:56.080]  so mark your calendar and join us live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January
[18:56.080 --> 19:08.120]  8 for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the scriptures we're listening to the
[19:08.120 --> 19:27.080]  book of Matthew 5 16 let your light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear
[19:27.080 --> 19:43.360]  join Nana and guests for both verses Bible studies will begin Wednesdays from 8 to 10
[19:43.360 --> 19:51.640]  p.m. starting January 8 from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8 from 8 to 10 p.m. starting
[19:51.640 --> 19:58.360]  already on this the 10th day of what day was what month it was was breath
[19:58.360 --> 20:07.280]  we're in December 2020 okay there we go I got it right this time okay and which we're
[20:07.280 --> 20:16.700]  talking about the suit that our attorney general filed in the supreme will when you sue a
[20:16.700 --> 20:25.380]  state. Or when one state sues another state, the court of original jurisdiction is the
[20:25.380 --> 20:34.900]  Supreme Court. So that was very helpful because we get to go straight to the Supreme, no dance
[20:34.900 --> 20:40.900]  around, dance around, and going to a district court and then going to the appellate court
[20:40.900 --> 20:46.140]  and then going to the Supreme. So this gets you there quickly. And this is certainly of
[20:46.140 --> 20:53.380]  sufficient import to get the attention of the Supreme immediately. And as I read this
[20:53.380 --> 21:03.460]  document, it may well be sufficient for a summary judgment ruling. Because it clearly
[21:03.460 --> 21:18.300]  states the law, the only issue is, can the states follow a ruling of a state court concerning
[21:18.300 --> 21:24.980]  the state legislature's directions on how to hold an election?
[21:24.980 --> 21:30.980]  That should be just dead bang. We have the judicial branch and we have the legislative
[21:30.980 --> 21:39.060]  branch. Yeah, but see that? The whole purpose of the judicial is to interpret the intent
[21:39.060 --> 21:46.740]  of the legislature because the legislature can't possibly address every single fine point
[21:46.740 --> 21:55.300]  of law. So we have the judiciary in there to say, okay, on reading the clear verbiage
[21:55.300 --> 22:04.060]  of the statute and applying the statute, implying the intent of the legislature in writing
[22:04.060 --> 22:10.660]  this statute to this unique situation that the statute may not have directly contemplated
[22:10.660 --> 22:17.860]  or may have, but the variation wasn't clear in the statute, then we need to provide clarity.
[22:17.860 --> 22:25.220]  Well, but that's a gray area they seem to love to take advantage of. Well, I believe
[22:25.220 --> 22:31.620]  his intent, the legislature's intent was to make sure that Biden gets elected. Therefore...
[22:31.620 --> 22:40.980]  Yeah, I got that. But see, that's our whole system of law. So what the Attorney General
[22:40.980 --> 22:53.940]  is saying is that the Supreme Court should rule that a ruling by a state court on state
[22:53.940 --> 23:02.900]  legislation that would have the effect of violating of the federal constitution should
[23:02.900 --> 23:10.180]  be overruled by this supreme and that's exactly how it should be done. But the pastor was saying
[23:10.180 --> 23:17.220]  we should prosecute all of them and I've said, no, no, no, no. We can't prosecute those individuals
[23:17.780 --> 23:24.420]  who followed the ruling of this court, even if they knew full well it was a contrived
[23:24.420 --> 23:33.860]  bogus ruling because we have a right to trust the rulings of our courts.
[23:33.860 --> 23:44.820]  So they acted in good faith reliance on a competent authority on a ruling of their
[23:44.820 --> 23:52.500]  state court. So we can't go after them directly, even if they knew what they were doing was wrongful.
[23:53.860 --> 23:59.540]  And from the appearance of it, you could hardly do this and not know it's wrongful.
[23:59.540 --> 24:09.140]  But anyway, we can't go for them. We can go for the ones who blocked the court watchers,
[24:09.860 --> 24:20.180]  the court watchers, blocked the election watchers who were there to observe the count,
[24:21.060 --> 24:26.420]  where they blocked them from observing the count and made these counts in ways that
[24:26.420 --> 24:35.940]  violated even their own codes. And in every state, they allege acts that violate the standing code
[24:35.940 --> 24:44.100]  of the state in this particular area specifically, where they, like in Wisconsin,
[24:44.100 --> 24:52.740]  they use drop boxes. And they argued that the legislature in the existing legislation
[24:52.740 --> 25:00.180]  forbids that in Wisconsin. And so for each state, they alleged a direct violation of
[25:00.180 --> 25:06.820]  existing law and a contrivance on the part of the Democratic Party to use the courts
[25:07.380 --> 25:14.500]  to create bogus court rulings. I think the judge should be prosecuted. He should go to prison
[25:14.500 --> 25:24.340]  for sedition. This is an attempt to undermine the United States. This should get sedition.
[25:25.060 --> 25:33.140]  He rendered a ruling that he absolutely knew did not properly apply the law to the facts.
[25:33.780 --> 25:39.540]  That should get him in jail. Now, we can't go after the people who followed his ruling,
[25:39.540 --> 25:47.300]  but we certainly can go after him. But in any case, they did the numbers. And if you,
[25:48.100 --> 26:01.700]  they said like in Detroit, Biden received 60 some percent of the vote and Trump received 30,
[26:01.700 --> 26:09.540]  I think 38 percent and 62 percent. If you take all of these numbers of all of these suspect
[26:09.540 --> 26:18.180]  right-in votes, the one in Pennsylvania where 100,000 were discovered in the post office
[26:18.180 --> 26:23.780]  after the polls closed, well, it's absolutely clear. You cannot count those, period.
[26:23.780 --> 26:32.100]  Just because they're given to the post office doesn't meet the statute. It must be in the
[26:32.100 --> 26:43.940]  elector's hands by 12 o'clock. And the Constitution is clear November 2nd is the election day.
[26:45.220 --> 26:52.260]  It's not November 2nd. It is the first Monday after the last something is complex.
[26:52.260 --> 27:01.220]  But it's generally the first Tuesday of November. That one day, all the votes have to be in in that
[27:01.220 --> 27:08.980]  one day. And we had somebody with a article, with a YouTube article saying that there was a court case,
[27:10.180 --> 27:19.140]  one Foster v. Love that says they all had to be counted on the voting day. Otherwise,
[27:19.140 --> 27:26.900]  they're all bored. Well, no, that wasn't true. That was a misreading of the case. What the case
[27:26.900 --> 27:37.300]  said, what the law says, the Constitution says, is all the votes must be in by midnight on election
[27:37.300 --> 27:47.220]  day. Once the clock strikes midnight, no more votes can be brought in. Okay. They can be counted
[27:47.220 --> 27:54.020]  later. But they all have to be in on time. So and they argued that these 100,000 that were
[27:54.020 --> 28:05.220]  supposedly ups, we made a mistake with 100,000. Right. Mail in votes and didn't get them to the
[28:05.220 --> 28:13.220]  court to the voting station within a lot of time limit. Now, give they might made a mistake with
[28:13.220 --> 28:21.380]  one mail document. And of course, the federal courts have handled this. That a lot of times,
[28:21.380 --> 28:29.220]  if you get sued, you will get a document in regular mail and you'll get a document in a certified
[28:29.220 --> 28:37.620]  bail. And what the courts have held is that we trust the postal service. The postal service
[28:37.620 --> 28:47.300]  might make a mistake on one document, but not two. The postal service may make a mistake on
[28:47.300 --> 28:57.780]  one right in vote, but not 100,000. So and they argued that if we take this 100,000 off based on
[28:57.780 --> 29:09.860]  68 for Biden, I'm sorry, 62 for Biden, 38 for Trump, that will decrease the overall number
[29:09.860 --> 29:17.300]  of votes sufficient so that Trump wins the election. Because in this county, 90 something
[29:17.300 --> 29:23.540]  percent of the votes, votes were registered for Biden. So they went through the numbers for each
[29:23.540 --> 29:30.820]  state that how it would statistically change the that how it would definitely change the election.
[29:30.820 --> 29:38.020]  And they went into statistics, we'll talk about those for me, come back on the other side,
[29:38.020 --> 29:47.860]  but some interesting statistical analysis based on midnight or 3am counting and what they counted
[29:47.860 --> 29:53.780]  the next day, the statistical likelihood that Biden could overcome within the quadrillions.
[29:54.340 --> 29:58.420]  We'll hang on. Randy Calton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[30:01.460 --> 30:06.180]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust them to keep it safe,
[30:06.180 --> 30:10.740]  but it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your
[30:10.740 --> 30:14.420]  secrets. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[30:14.420 --> 30:19.300]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[30:19.300 --> 30:22.820]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[30:22.820 --> 30:27.300]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights,
[30:27.300 --> 30:33.540]  say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.540 --> 30:37.140]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com,
[30:37.140 --> 30:45.060]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with startpage.
[30:45.060 --> 30:50.100]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle
[30:50.100 --> 30:55.780]  your personal information. But what happens if it escapes their control? It's not an idle question.
[30:55.780 --> 31:01.780]  According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached
[31:01.780 --> 31:07.860]  by hackers in the last year. That's one more reason you should trust your searches to startpage.com.
[31:07.860 --> 31:13.060]  Unlike other search engines, startpage doesn't store any data on you. They've never been hacked,
[31:13.060 --> 31:17.940]  but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare.
[31:17.940 --> 31:20.900]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:21.540 --> 31:26.020]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:26.020 --> 31:37.940]  I lost my son, my uncle, on September 11, 2000. Most people don't know that a third tower fell
[31:37.940 --> 31:43.300]  on September 11. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:43.300 --> 31:49.140]  Will the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7? Over 1200 architects
[31:49.140 --> 31:53.460]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story. Bring justice
[31:53.460 --> 31:59.700]  to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. Go to buildingwhats.org. Why it fell, why it matters,
[31:59.700 --> 32:05.620]  and what you can do. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In
[32:05.620 --> 32:09.140]  today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[32:09.140 --> 32:13.060]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.060 --> 32:15.780]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:15.780 --> 32:20.020]  the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to do process of law.
[32:20.020 --> 32:24.260]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.260 --> 32:28.340]  our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy, A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule of
[32:28.340 --> 32:32.020]  Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[32:32.020 --> 32:36.260]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own
[32:36.260 --> 32:40.900]  copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copies today.
[32:40.900 --> 32:44.980]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law versus
[32:44.980 --> 32:50.020]  the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful
[32:50.020 --> 32:53.380]  resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from
[32:53.380 --> 32:58.900]  ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.740 --> 33:06.740]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[33:06.740 --> 33:22.100]  Yes, Mr. Officer, you're taking the light of heaven. Won't you follow the law of the land?
[33:23.700 --> 33:31.220]  I don't have this bad. The job is to protect and preserve, not be Arabis.
[33:31.220 --> 33:40.420]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio on this Thursday, the 10th day
[33:40.420 --> 33:48.900]  of December 2020. And I have the introduction here that's a little long, but it's worth going
[33:48.900 --> 33:55.140]  through. Plaintive State Challenges, Defendant States Administrations 2020 election under the
[33:55.140 --> 34:03.140]  Electors Clause of Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 and the 14th Amendment of the United States.
[34:04.260 --> 34:11.860]  This case represents a question of law. Did Defendant States violate the Electors Clause
[34:11.860 --> 34:19.300]  or in the alternative, the 14th Amendment by taking or allowing non-legislative actions to
[34:19.300 --> 34:25.620]  change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors?
[34:27.220 --> 34:34.660]  That's the issue, the only issue here before the court. Okay, then he goes on. The unconstitutional
[34:34.660 --> 34:42.100]  change is open to doors for election irregularities in various forms. Plaintive States alleges that
[34:42.100 --> 34:48.660]  each of the defendant states flagrantly violated constitutional rules governing the appointment
[34:48.660 --> 34:56.020]  of presidential electors. In doing so, seeds of deep distrust have been sown across the country.
[34:56.020 --> 35:03.060]  In the spirit of Marbury v. Madison, this court's attention is profoundly needed to declare what the
[35:03.060 --> 35:09.940]  law is and to restore public trust in this election, the reference to Marbury v. Madison.
[35:10.820 --> 35:17.620]  Marbury v. Madison is the one that makes a distinction between law and policy.
[35:17.620 --> 35:28.500]  Or practice. It states that practice is not law, that it may have the appearance of law,
[35:28.500 --> 35:33.860]  but it never takes on the force of law. As Justice Gorsuch observed recently,
[35:34.420 --> 35:41.300]  government is not free to disregard the Constitution in times of crisis. And I didn't go look this up,
[35:41.300 --> 35:49.860]  Brett, but I believe Justice Gorsuch is the one who ruled in the Shelley Gunther case,
[35:51.220 --> 35:58.020]  where it said that the Constitution is not abandoned simply because we have a pandemic,
[35:59.220 --> 36:06.820]  that it should not be abandoned when we need it most. Yet recently, during the COVID pandemic,
[36:06.820 --> 36:14.820]  certain states seem to have ignored these long-settled principles. Each of the defendant states
[36:14.820 --> 36:23.140]  acted in such, in each of the defendant states acted in a common pattern. State officials,
[36:23.140 --> 36:30.500]  sometimes through pending legislation, settling friendly suits, and sometimes unilaterally by
[36:30.500 --> 36:37.460]  executive fiat, announced new rules for the conduct of the 2020 election that were inconsistent with
[36:37.460 --> 36:44.900]  existing state statutes defining what constitutes a lawful vote. Defendant states also failed to
[36:44.900 --> 36:50.580]  segregate ballots in a manner that would permit accurate analysis to determine which ballots
[36:50.580 --> 36:57.060]  were cast in conformity with the legislatively set rules and which were not. This is especially true
[36:57.060 --> 37:03.780]  of the mail-in ballots in these states. By waiving, lowering, and otherwise failing to follow
[37:03.780 --> 37:09.700]  the state statutory requirements for signature validation and other processes for ballot
[37:09.700 --> 37:18.100]  security, the entire body of such ballots is now constitutionally suspect and may not be legitimately
[37:18.100 --> 37:26.740]  used to determine allocation of the defendant state's presidential electors. The rampant lawlessness
[37:26.740 --> 37:32.660]  arising out of defendant states' unconstitutional acts is described in a number of currently
[37:32.660 --> 37:40.100]  pending lawsuits in defendant states or in public view, including dozens of witnesses testifying
[37:40.100 --> 37:47.060]  under oath, the physical blocking and kicking out of Republican poll challengers, thousands of
[37:47.060 --> 37:55.380]  the same ballot run multiple times through tabulators, mysterious late-night dumps of thousands of votes
[37:55.380 --> 38:02.900]  at tabulation centers, illegally backdating thousands of ballots, signature verification
[38:02.900 --> 38:10.100]  procedures ignored. More than 173,000 ballots in Wayne County, Michigan
[38:11.220 --> 38:17.940]  centered in Wayne County Mission Center that cannot be tied to a registered voter.
[38:17.940 --> 38:24.980]  Videos of poll workers erupting in cheers as poll challengers are removed from the vote counting
[38:24.980 --> 38:31.540]  centers, poll watchers being blocked from entering vote counting centers, despite even having the
[38:31.540 --> 38:38.180]  court order to enter. Suitcases full of ballots being pulled out from underneath tables after
[38:38.180 --> 38:45.380]  polled watchers were told to leave. Facts for which no independently verified reasonable
[38:45.380 --> 38:53.620]  explanation yet exists. On October 1, 2020, in Pennsylvania, a laptop and several USB drives
[38:53.620 --> 38:59.780]  were used to program Pennsylvania's Dominion voting machines were mysteriously stolen from
[38:59.780 --> 39:06.100]  a warehouse in Philadelphia. The laptop and USB drives were the only items taken and potentially
[39:06.100 --> 39:13.060]  could be used to alter vote tallies. In Michigan, by the way, this is the only reference they make
[39:13.060 --> 39:18.980]  to the voting machines. In Michigan, which also employed the same Dominion voting system on
[39:18.980 --> 39:26.180]  November 4, 2020, Michigan election officials have admitted that a purported glitch caused
[39:26.180 --> 39:34.020]  6,000 votes for President Trump to be wrongly switched to Democrat candidate Biden. A flash
[39:34.020 --> 39:39.940]  drive containing tens of thousands of votes was left unattended in the Milwaukee Tabulation Center
[39:39.940 --> 39:46.660]  in early morning hours of November 4, 2020 without anyone aware it was not in a proper chain of
[39:46.660 --> 39:54.660]  custody. Nor was this court immune from the blatant disregard for the rule of law. Pennsylvania
[39:54.660 --> 40:00.500]  itself played fast and loose with its promise to this court. In a classic bait and switch,
[40:00.500 --> 40:06.340]  Pennsylvania used guidance from its Secretary of State to argue that this court should not
[40:06.340 --> 40:13.860]  expedite review because the state would segregate potentially unlawful balance. A court of law
[40:13.860 --> 40:20.580]  would reasonably rely on such a representation. Remarkably, before the ink was dry on the court,
[40:20.580 --> 40:26.580]  it's four to four decision. Pennsylvania changed that guidance, breaking the state's promise
[40:26.580 --> 40:37.140]  to this court. Compare Replicant Party of Pennsylvania versus Brock Var. It doesn't have the exact day.
[40:37.140 --> 40:42.980]  Oh, here it is, October 28, 2020. We've been informed by the Pennsylvania Attorney General
[40:42.980 --> 40:48.660]  that the Secretary of the Commonwealth issued guidance today directing county boards of elections
[40:48.660 --> 40:56.740]  to segregate ballots. This is from the October 28 promise. The court was not informed that the
[40:56.740 --> 41:02.180]  guidance issued on the October 28, which had been an important bearing on the question of
[41:02.180 --> 41:07.300]  whether to order special treatment of these ballots in question, had been modified to the
[41:07.300 --> 41:14.660]  elite. Experts' analysis using a commonly accepted statistical test further raises
[41:14.660 --> 41:22.020]  serious questions as to the integrity of this election. The probability of former Vice President
[41:22.020 --> 41:28.660]  biding winning the popular vote in four defendant states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and
[41:28.660 --> 41:36.100]  Wisconsin, independently given President Trump's early lead in those states as of 3 a.m. on November
[41:36.100 --> 41:47.460]  4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion, or one in 10 with three, six, nine, 12, 15 zeros,
[41:48.100 --> 41:55.940]  one raised to the 10th, 15th power. For former Vice President Biden to win these four states
[41:55.940 --> 42:02.660]  collectively, the odds that event happening decreased to less than one in a quadrillion
[42:02.660 --> 42:15.540]  to the fourth power. That's one, three, six, nine, 12, 15, and four more zeros, so 21 zeros,
[42:16.260 --> 42:25.140]  one to the minus 21, one to the 21st power. The same less than one quadrillion statistical
[42:25.140 --> 42:32.420]  probability of Biden winning the popular vote in the four defendant states, Georgia, Pennsylvania,
[42:32.420 --> 42:40.900]  and Wisconsin independently exists when Biden's performance in each of those defendant states
[42:40.900 --> 42:46.980]  is compared to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's performance in 2016 general election
[42:46.980 --> 42:52.820]  and President Trump's performance in 2016 general elections. Again, the statistical
[42:52.820 --> 42:58.900]  improbability of Biden winning the popular vote in these four states collectively is
[42:58.900 --> 43:09.060]  a really big number, three, six, nine, 12, 15, one to the 20th power.
[43:11.140 --> 43:16.900]  Put simply, there is a substantial reason to doubt the voting results in defendant states by
[43:16.900 --> 43:23.220]  purporting to waive or otherwise modify the existing state law in a manner that was wholly
[43:23.220 --> 43:29.380]  ultra virus and not adopted by each state's legislature. Defendant states violated not
[43:29.380 --> 43:37.780]  only the electors clause, U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section 1, column 2, but also fell off the
[43:37.780 --> 43:45.380]  cliff, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, the rule of low radio. I might have had time to finish that.
[43:45.380 --> 43:56.980]  We'll be right back. Oh, the phones are on. So give us a call 512-646-1984. Now we'll be right back.
[44:15.380 --> 44:26.980]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[44:26.980 --> 44:32.180]  But order them your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go
[44:32.180 --> 44:38.900]  to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you order anything
[44:38.900 --> 44:45.220]  from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to
[44:45.220 --> 44:51.860]  do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving
[44:51.860 --> 44:57.700]  without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are
[44:57.700 --> 45:05.300]  Logos. Happy holidays, Logos. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without
[45:05.300 --> 45:11.780]  an attorney with jurisdictionary. The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show
[45:11.780 --> 45:19.300]  you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.300 --> 45:24.900]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step
[45:24.900 --> 45:32.340]  by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years
[45:32.340 --> 45:38.340]  of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.340 --> 45:44.260]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our
[45:44.260 --> 45:52.340]  audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.340 --> 46:10.340]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.340 --> 46:52.180]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelston.
[46:52.180 --> 46:58.340]  Brett Fountain, rule of law radio. Okay, I'm almost finished. I've got four more sections.
[46:59.380 --> 47:06.900]  I noted to Brett on the break that there was no legal ease in this reading.
[47:08.580 --> 47:16.340]  Except two words, ultravi-raise, and those are so common that I suspect all of our listeners know
[47:16.340 --> 47:23.540]  what that means. And for those who don't, ultravi-raise means beyond the limits of their contract.
[47:24.980 --> 47:29.540]  Okay, I'll finish out these. I'll reread this. And by purporting
[47:29.540 --> 47:35.860]  to waiver, otherwise modify the existing state law in a manner that was wholly ultravi-raise
[47:36.420 --> 47:42.020]  and not adopted by each state's legislature, defendant states violated not only the electors
[47:42.020 --> 47:49.140]  clause U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2, but also the elections clause.
[47:50.100 --> 47:58.100]  Article 1, Section 4, to the extent that Article 1 elections clause texturally applies to the Article
[47:58.100 --> 48:04.820]  2 process of selecting presidential electors. Plenty states and their voters are entitled
[48:04.820 --> 48:11.460]  to a presidential election in which the votes from each of the states are counted only if the
[48:11.460 --> 48:18.260]  ballots are cast and counted in a manner that complies with the pre-existing laws of each state.
[48:19.060 --> 48:23.940]  Any quotes in case law? That's really great. I'm glad that you put that in there as a right.
[48:25.220 --> 48:27.940]  It's not something that's just, well, we wish it would be this way.
[48:28.820 --> 48:30.820]  Yes. Rights of the people.
[48:32.260 --> 48:37.940]  President and the vice president of the United States are the only elected officials
[48:37.940 --> 48:43.700]  who represent all the voters in the nation. Voters who cast lawful ballots cannot have
[48:43.700 --> 48:50.100]  their votes diminished by states that administered their 2020 presidential elections in a manner
[48:50.100 --> 48:55.460]  where it is impossible to distinguish a lawful ballot from an unlawful ballot,
[48:55.460 --> 49:01.860]  and that's where he establishes standing. The number of absentee and mail-in ballots that
[49:01.860 --> 49:08.260]  have been handled unconstitutionally in defendant states greatly exceeds the difference between
[49:08.260 --> 49:13.540]  the vote totals of the two candidates for president in the United States in each defendant state.
[49:14.420 --> 49:20.340]  In addition to injective relief for this election,
[49:21.620 --> 49:26.740]  plaintiff states seek declaratory relief for all presidential elections in the future.
[49:26.740 --> 49:34.100]  This problem is clearly capable of repetition yet evading review. The integrity of our constitutional
[49:34.100 --> 49:40.820]  democracy requires that states conduct presidential elections in accordance with the rule of law and
[49:40.820 --> 49:47.780]  federal constitutional guarantees. An eighth grader can understand that.
[49:47.780 --> 49:55.540]  This is how you write legal documents. I was impressed, and for all of those of us who voted
[49:55.540 --> 50:02.340]  for Trump and who were legitimately concerned of what would happen if Biden gets in and does
[50:02.340 --> 50:13.780]  what he has stated he would do. Historically, republics tend to last about 250 years.
[50:13.780 --> 50:23.380]  This republic was established in 1776 through the math.
[50:25.780 --> 50:32.740]  246 years. I'm concerned that we will lose our republic.
[50:34.740 --> 50:40.260]  My brother voted for Trump. I'm sorry, my brother hated Trump. He voted for Biden.
[50:40.260 --> 50:50.340]  He's just retired from one of the airlines. What's he going to do when this party
[50:51.060 --> 50:55.460]  collapses the economy, which is in the process of doing especially in California?
[50:56.420 --> 51:00.340]  And the airline bankrupts and he loses his pension.
[51:00.340 --> 51:12.340]  When he gets socialized medicine and he contracts a condition for which he has
[51:12.340 --> 51:22.260]  been given a span of time to survive, then he's put on a list that's two years beyond
[51:22.260 --> 51:31.060]  his prognosis. I was in an airplane several years ago with a 26-year-old journalist from England.
[51:31.940 --> 51:38.260]  And she was in the United States because she had a rare cancer that had given her three years to
[51:38.260 --> 51:47.060]  live and she was put on a five-year waiting list. This is what you got. If it comes to that,
[51:47.060 --> 51:56.340]  those who voted for the Democrats, this is what you asked for. I am concerned that this is exactly
[51:56.340 --> 52:03.460]  what will happen. Biden has said that he intends to pack the court with up to 20
[52:05.700 --> 52:15.460]  Supreme Court justices. All of those appointed for Democrat as Democrats and there will be no
[52:15.460 --> 52:22.260]  more valid constitutional rulings. He's also indicated he intends to include two more states,
[52:22.260 --> 52:32.500]  Puerto Rico and the Washington D.C. as states. That would add two more Democratic states and would
[52:32.500 --> 52:39.300]  ensure that the Republicans never win another election. At that point, our Republic would cease.
[52:39.300 --> 52:50.100]  So I've been very concerned. That's why we have some laws to say how states get added,
[52:50.100 --> 52:59.220]  or is it just a president's whim? No, it takes a lot to add a state. I think it takes a constitutional
[52:59.220 --> 53:08.820]  referendum. But if the Democrats have captured the system, it won't matter. They can change
[53:08.820 --> 53:17.540]  constitution however they want to. And they have completely captured the media. I was watching
[53:17.540 --> 53:27.620]  a program about Nazi Germany in the mid to late 30s and it sounded remarkably like what I'm seeing
[53:27.620 --> 53:39.300]  today, that was disturbing. They took over the media and by taking over the media, they were able
[53:39.300 --> 53:45.780]  to so manipulate the minds of the public in general that they would participate in the
[53:45.780 --> 53:56.820]  assassination of a race. How does it get worse than that? They don't have to do anything anywhere
[53:56.820 --> 54:06.340]  near so maniacal to completely eliminate our Republic. So I'm concerned for the Republic.
[54:07.460 --> 54:12.820]  It should be noted that I am not a Democrat and I am not a Republican. I've never taken
[54:12.820 --> 54:20.260]  a side. I am just as afraid of the Republicans getting both the House and the Senate and the
[54:20.260 --> 54:29.140]  presidency as I am the Democrats. As far as I'm concerned, they all have their snouts in the same
[54:29.140 --> 54:39.860]  trough. The only one that appears not to now is Trump. Neither side likes him and it was the intent
[54:39.860 --> 54:48.500]  of our founders that we be at least a three-party system. With a three-party system, you're always
[54:48.500 --> 54:55.140]  going to have an outlier. Now we have a two-party system and they are walking lockstep with one
[54:55.140 --> 55:03.380]  another. The differences between the systems are so minor as to be irrelevant. They take minor
[55:03.380 --> 55:09.700]  issues and blow those issues up and then attack the exaggerate the issues and attack those
[55:09.700 --> 55:16.980]  exaggerations. That's called a straw man and they do that to focus the public on issues that are
[55:16.980 --> 55:25.940]  in the long run unimportant. While they were constantly undermining us, we need a three-party
[55:25.940 --> 55:36.580]  system and I'm frustrated with the other party. I want to say unitarian, unitarian of them.
[55:36.580 --> 55:46.340]  What are they, Brett? Come on. You've been taking your zinc, Brett.
[55:47.860 --> 55:55.940]  My zinc. I forgot all about the zinc. I was taking zinc and I don't remember the last time I forgot
[55:55.940 --> 56:03.620]  something. A libertarian party. There we go. I'm frustrated that they kept taking on these
[56:03.620 --> 56:11.620]  really, really divisive issues. Instead of taking on issues that were important to everybody,
[56:13.620 --> 56:19.540]  they took on marijuana a long time ago when it was very unpopular. It made sure they never got
[56:20.180 --> 56:28.260]  rose to a position of prominence. I did a keynote speech to the Libertarian Convention
[56:28.260 --> 56:37.780]  in Bridgeport, Connecticut a number of years ago and that's what I talked to them about.
[56:38.740 --> 56:44.820]  Take on the issues everybody cares about. Give us a reasonable position to those issues.
[56:45.620 --> 56:51.140]  Instead of taking on these localized divisive issues to make sure you don't rise up to third
[56:51.140 --> 57:00.100]  party status, we need a third party. That's off topic. Back to this document. The rest of the
[57:00.100 --> 57:08.980]  document goes through each state separately and specifically how each state manipulated
[57:09.620 --> 57:15.780]  primarily the right-end votes to create whatever outcome they wanted.
[57:15.780 --> 57:24.420]  So if anybody doesn't have it, if you want it, send me an email. I'll send it to you.
[57:25.300 --> 57:31.220]  Read it twice. You will feel much better about what's about to happen.
[57:34.980 --> 57:40.740]  Okay. Do you have any comment, Brett? Well, you know, to be fair, these people that
[57:40.740 --> 57:47.300]  are complaining about the mail-in ballot counting, maybe they don't realize how difficult it is to
[57:47.300 --> 57:57.060]  try to check the signature of a dead person. That's pretty complicated. Good point. I hadn't
[57:57.060 --> 58:05.620]  even considered that, especially if they've been dead for 10 years. Okay. This is Randy
[58:05.620 --> 58:10.820]  Kelton, Brett Fountain. We have the phone lines on and when we come back on the other side, we'll
[58:10.820 --> 58:17.780]  start taking your calls. We have two callers up. We have four slots on the call in board. So if you
[58:17.780 --> 58:22.740]  have a question or comment, give us a call. We'll be taking your calls for the rest of the night.
[58:22.740 --> 58:30.500]  And Brett helped me out here. I started the outro too soon and I've got 24 seconds. Say something
[58:30.500 --> 58:37.860]  intelligent and insightful. Oh boy, like Scott. All right. Well, how about this? The call-in
[58:37.860 --> 58:47.700]  number is 512-646-1984. That'll work. How's that? We'll be right back.
[58:50.180 --> 58:55.700]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.700 --> 59:01.700]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text
[59:01.700 --> 59:08.180]  that in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. Enter the recovery
[59:08.180 --> 59:14.660]  version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the
[59:14.660 --> 59:21.540]  more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous
[59:21.540 --> 59:27.220]  way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.860 --> 59:32.580]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.220 --> 59:43.620]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.620 --> 01:00:00.420]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:13.620 --> 01:00:20.900]  $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.900 --> 01:00:29.220]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.220 --> 01:00:46.020]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:46.020 --> 01:00:52.500]  In history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[01:00:52.500 --> 01:00:57.540]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[01:00:57.540 --> 01:01:00.420]  killing 10 and entering 40 today in history.
[01:01:04.580 --> 01:01:08.580]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325,
[01:01:08.580 --> 01:01:12.740]  legalizing hemp into Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state,
[01:01:12.740 --> 01:01:17.220]  including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and
[01:01:17.220 --> 01:01:21.540]  even refusing to file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time
[01:01:21.540 --> 01:01:26.820]  or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District
[01:01:26.820 --> 01:01:30.820]  Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and
[01:01:30.820 --> 01:01:35.540]  delivery of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials,
[01:01:35.540 --> 01:01:39.540]  including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on
[01:01:39.540 --> 01:01:44.660]  Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a
[01:01:44.660 --> 01:01:51.140]  misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the district attorney.
[01:01:51.140 --> 01:01:57.380]  In El Paso, Caima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote,
[01:01:57.380 --> 01:02:02.820]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue
[01:02:02.820 --> 01:02:07.620]  was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County,
[01:02:07.620 --> 01:02:12.020]  who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based
[01:02:12.020 --> 01:02:16.020]  on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something,
[01:02:16.020 --> 01:02:25.060]  the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five
[01:02:25.060 --> 01:02:30.020]  and a half inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico,
[01:02:30.020 --> 01:02:35.540]  the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[01:02:35.540 --> 01:02:40.900]  being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the
[01:02:40.900 --> 01:02:47.620]  shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins. For the purpose, it is hypothesized
[01:02:47.620 --> 01:03:13.620]  to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:03:17.620 --> 01:03:35.620]  Okay, we are back. This is the rule of law radio.
[01:03:36.900 --> 01:03:44.340]  Randy Kelton, I'm Brett Fountain, and this is the 10th of December, 2020. Well, we've had some
[01:03:44.340 --> 01:03:50.420]  good discussion about Ken Paxton and what he's doing, and we're going to go to our callers,
[01:03:50.420 --> 01:03:55.300]  Scott from Texas. Good evening, Scott. What have you got for us?
[01:03:56.260 --> 01:04:02.660]  Well, howdy, howdy. I was just wondering who sent you that lawsuit because I sure recall
[01:04:02.660 --> 01:04:07.540]  sending you a document yesterday along with a couple other people. And by the way, you're going
[01:04:07.540 --> 01:04:16.980]  to be getting it. I just thought it was some redneck chump. Well, I mean, it just kills you
[01:04:16.980 --> 01:04:23.300]  to get just a little bit of credence, you know, that I actually found that document and sent
[01:04:23.300 --> 01:04:29.540]  it over to you. Yeah, I didn't. I actually didn't remember who sent it to me, or I would have given
[01:04:29.540 --> 01:04:37.940]  you credit. Okay, so I'll pat you on the back a little bit so you can stop patting yourself on
[01:04:37.940 --> 01:04:44.820]  the back. I'd hate for you to sprain your wrist. No, shoot, I'm breaking my arm over here, man.
[01:04:44.820 --> 01:04:51.700]  Help person out. And then I think I was the one saying that the states get one vote and you said
[01:04:51.700 --> 01:04:56.580]  to senators because you and the pastor are going back and forth and said, no, I think I already
[01:04:56.580 --> 01:05:06.420]  was the one vote per state. So yeah, and you turned out to be right on that. So pat yourself some more.
[01:05:07.380 --> 01:05:15.700]  Oh, out, out. And let's get on to something more interesting. Well, you know, I was right about
[01:05:15.700 --> 01:05:24.100]  the chump redneck. Well, that's about the only thing you got right on me yet. But let me give
[01:05:24.100 --> 01:05:31.780]  you my take on it because there's a lot of a lot of really nice words in there and it's really a
[01:05:31.780 --> 01:05:41.540]  super long document. But here is my take and the summation of it real concise. Like the
[01:05:43.700 --> 01:05:51.300]  since those states changed the law without the legislature actually changing the law. In other
[01:05:51.300 --> 01:05:55.780]  words, the governor's just going there and will he will he nearly just changing the law?
[01:05:56.660 --> 01:06:04.740]  That is a violation of the Constitution of their state legislature because they superseded the
[01:06:04.740 --> 01:06:13.940]  legislator. Now when the Texas when came back to put that lawsuit in, they don't have to prove fraud
[01:06:13.940 --> 01:06:24.100]  at all. All they have to show is the states violated their own law on how the electoral process is
[01:06:24.100 --> 01:06:33.220]  done. And that's dead bang. So that's a slam dunk case there because it's already done. It's already
[01:06:33.220 --> 01:06:39.620]  been set in stone. They did that. That's all they have to show. They don't have to show any
[01:06:39.620 --> 01:06:46.740]  type of election fraud at all. All the institutions point out they violated their own laws in order
[01:06:46.740 --> 01:06:55.300]  to rewrite the laws to their favorite period in the story. And I was saying on the break
[01:06:55.300 --> 01:07:08.580]  to breath that the in reading this document, the document stated facts, facts that were from the
[01:07:08.580 --> 01:07:15.460]  news that were public available to everyone. So these facts were uncontrovertible.
[01:07:17.380 --> 01:07:23.300]  So if you take these uncontrovertible facts and apply the law to those facts,
[01:07:23.300 --> 01:07:34.340]  that's sufficient for some re judgment. And the SCOTUS could rule summarily without even giving
[01:07:34.340 --> 01:07:44.420]  these the other side a chance to respond because the facts cannot be controverted. And the law is
[01:07:44.420 --> 01:07:50.740]  clear. So it was really the document is really well done. The part we didn't get to is they go to
[01:07:50.740 --> 01:07:59.940]  each state and stipulate specifically these things that occurred. And all of these things
[01:07:59.940 --> 01:08:08.500]  that they stipulate occurred were very open to the public. The flash drive they spoke of,
[01:08:08.500 --> 01:08:16.180]  that was in the news. That was the message. We've got these states that we thought they
[01:08:16.180 --> 01:08:25.940]  would not dare, like Pennsylvania, they would not dare to throw out the fraud issues that were
[01:08:25.940 --> 01:08:34.820]  brought to them. And they did. And what is going to happen if the Supreme Court of the United States
[01:08:34.820 --> 01:08:46.660]  decides to not rule properly on this? Wish good. Yeah, but that's not going to happen. Now that
[01:08:46.660 --> 01:08:55.620]  17 other states have joined in, this is turning into a real storm that they're going to have to,
[01:08:56.180 --> 01:09:04.500]  SCOTUS cannot not rule on this case anymore because it's become such a, it's become so broad
[01:09:04.500 --> 01:09:12.260]  and all these other states will be disenfranchised by four states that can swing any election
[01:09:12.260 --> 01:09:19.940]  because of their arbitrary rule changing at the last minute, which is unconstitutional,
[01:09:19.940 --> 01:09:29.140]  bypassing their own legislators, that can't stand. So they have a duty now to rule on this case,
[01:09:29.140 --> 01:09:37.060]  no matter, and here was the thing. All those states that were listed in that suit had to
[01:09:37.060 --> 01:09:45.780]  answer in a brief by three o'clock today. Today was their day to put their briefs in. And if they
[01:09:45.780 --> 01:09:51.300]  didn't get them, that's just too bad. And from what I'm kind of hearing, they've slung some stuff
[01:09:51.300 --> 01:09:57.460]  together that's supposed to look like it's just bad. So it's going to be kind of interesting to see
[01:09:57.460 --> 01:10:03.780]  what kind of documents they try to produce to kick them in, but they had to, they had to have all
[01:10:03.780 --> 01:10:10.900]  that stuff in today by three o'clock. So that was really interesting to hear as well.
[01:10:12.020 --> 01:10:19.940]  And that gives SCOTUS four days to render a ruling before that 14, December 14 deadline.
[01:10:19.940 --> 01:10:30.100]  Which is now, and like I said, I don't know if I brought this up to you, but that 14-day deadline
[01:10:30.100 --> 01:10:37.300]  is written in the federal laws, but it's not constitutional. The only constitutional deadline
[01:10:37.300 --> 01:10:46.420]  date is like you said, January 20th. So those bad days from what the white paper was coming to,
[01:10:46.420 --> 01:10:54.260]  that date is not set in stone and it can be changed. It can be, I forgot the term that they use, but
[01:10:54.260 --> 01:11:01.700]  basically they can just, they can postpone that date for a few more days for SCOTUS to make any
[01:11:01.700 --> 01:11:10.180]  type of ruling. And Trump is also joined as an intervener into this case now, where he can,
[01:11:10.180 --> 01:11:17.300]  he can intervene and put in, because he's directly affected by this. So that was kind of another
[01:11:17.300 --> 01:11:24.420]  point that he will probably chime in and make a few comments and they'll add some more subject.
[01:11:24.420 --> 01:11:35.860]  Okay. Now I'm afraid. Well, here's the thing. Here's the thing. He could chime in or he could
[01:11:35.860 --> 01:11:40.500]  just, he could just run up a trial balloon and say he's going to chime in. It doesn't matter.
[01:11:41.060 --> 01:11:48.820]  They have already violated their own laws. That's all they have to stick to. They violated the laws
[01:11:48.820 --> 01:11:56.100]  and there is no way that that can remain standing. Because if that's the case, then why have elections
[01:11:56.100 --> 01:12:02.020]  at all? They can just change it at any time. It just, that don't, that don't fly. So by them
[01:12:02.020 --> 01:12:10.740]  changing their laws, already on the books, it's already done. It's now a fact. And a fact is
[01:12:10.740 --> 01:12:21.940]  something that has occurred and this has occurred. What this document went to is the election between
[01:12:21.940 --> 01:12:33.700]  Bush and Gore, the hanging chat issue in Florida. And it indicates that this is essentially the same
[01:12:33.700 --> 01:12:43.220]  issue, but it's that issue on steroids. It's the same issue spread across a number of states.
[01:12:43.220 --> 01:12:52.580]  And so this is not unprecedented. These issues have been brought up before. And as you look back
[01:12:52.580 --> 01:13:03.220]  in the case law, elections have always been fraught with cheating, ballot stuffing, and paid votes.
[01:13:03.220 --> 01:13:09.540]  And all these problems we're having have always been problems in elections. So there's nothing
[01:13:09.540 --> 01:13:15.540]  unique. There's nothing new about this. It seems new to us because we haven't heard this
[01:13:15.540 --> 01:13:23.860]  particular issue, but it's been here before. So there's plenty of underlying case law to support
[01:13:24.500 --> 01:13:30.020]  the claims that are being brought. It will be very difficult for the Supreme to rule
[01:13:30.740 --> 01:13:35.940]  against this particular case. And that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[01:13:35.940 --> 01:13:44.180]  Well, talking about election rigging and fraud, there was a guy who did a little nice little
[01:13:44.180 --> 01:13:55.780]  history thing talking about Abraham Lincoln and his second term. They tried to
[01:13:57.220 --> 01:14:00.740]  push shenanigans on them. But do you remember exactly what it was, Scott?
[01:14:00.740 --> 01:14:10.100]  All I can recall is they did the same thing. They were ballot stuffing at that point. And so
[01:14:10.100 --> 01:14:15.540]  they had to go and take it to the Supreme. I don't remember everything about it because
[01:14:15.540 --> 01:14:21.460]  I've been gathering a lot of intel on a lot of other things as well. I just listened to that.
[01:14:21.460 --> 01:14:25.220]  I thought that was really interesting. It was like, well, history repeats itself.
[01:14:25.220 --> 01:14:32.340]  Yeah. The point is, this is not something new. We look at this and we say, oh, this is horrible,
[01:14:32.340 --> 01:14:41.140]  but this isn't going on all the time. And the Supreme has to weigh in to keep the system somewhat
[01:14:41.140 --> 01:14:49.060]  stable because all of these politicians want to cheat in their favor. This is not a unique
[01:14:49.060 --> 01:14:56.580]  democratic issue. So if it sounds like we're vilifying the Democrats, this is absolutely
[01:14:56.580 --> 01:15:04.900]  not limited to Democrats. When the Republicans point a finger at the Democrats, that's kind of
[01:15:04.900 --> 01:15:14.900]  cotton kettle stuff. The one factor we have in our favor is that both parties keep pointing
[01:15:14.900 --> 01:15:23.060]  fingers at both parties. So it kind of helps keep us in the middle. And it's my opinion that
[01:15:23.060 --> 01:15:33.060]  that's what the Supreme will do, but who knows at the end of the day. But I'm less depressed than I
[01:15:33.060 --> 01:15:42.100]  was when I did Pastor Massage Show. Well, you were going to bring us an update on other things
[01:15:42.100 --> 01:15:49.860]  going on. Is there anything else going on that we should know about? Oh my goodness. Yes. So
[01:15:50.660 --> 01:15:58.900]  talking about Democrats, your favorite people, Eric Swalwell out of California has just been
[01:15:58.900 --> 01:16:06.420]  busted for having an affair with a Chinese spy. And he was on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
[01:16:06.420 --> 01:16:13.700]  Well, this busted out, I think it was like two days ago, and it started burning up the internet
[01:16:13.700 --> 01:16:19.620]  yesterday because everybody started. Hold on. There was one thing that I was struck by.
[01:16:20.900 --> 01:16:29.620]  Fox News actually broke this story. What the heck was that? No, they got that from Axiom because
[01:16:29.620 --> 01:16:36.500]  Axiom was the one who broke it. Well, Fox News put it on national news. Does this mean that Fox
[01:16:36.500 --> 01:16:42.420]  News is seeing the writing on the wall, and they're actually going to do something outlandish
[01:16:43.220 --> 01:16:51.860]  and report real news? Hang on. Brandy Kelton, Brett Fouton, Riddle Without Radio. I'll call
[01:16:51.860 --> 01:17:03.300]  in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to
[01:17:03.300 --> 01:17:08.900]  our lineup for the new year. Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th,
[01:17:08.900 --> 01:17:15.780]  from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time. Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516. Let your light so shine
[01:17:15.780 --> 01:17:21.060]  before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
[01:17:21.060 --> 01:17:26.020]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:26.020 --> 01:17:31.540]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed
[01:17:31.540 --> 01:17:37.220]  to provoke unto love and good works. Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of
[01:17:37.220 --> 01:17:43.380]  Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week. Our topical Bible studies will vary each week
[01:17:43.380 --> 01:17:48.580]  and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development. So mark your
[01:17:48.580 --> 01:17:56.340]  calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8
[01:17:56.340 --> 01:17:59.540]  for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[01:18:04.180 --> 01:18:09.540]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by
[01:18:09.540 --> 01:18:16.340]  Central Texas Gun Works. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated.
[01:18:16.340 --> 01:18:21.620]  Everything helps to keep us on the air. From Central Texas Gun Works the grand prize up for
[01:18:21.620 --> 01:18:29.380]  grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR 15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a
[01:18:29.380 --> 01:18:35.940]  chance to win. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book Legal 101 you get four chances to win.
[01:18:35.940 --> 01:18:41.380]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on
[01:18:41.380 --> 01:18:47.300]  Logos Radio Network support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming
[01:18:47.300 --> 01:18:53.780]  on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and remember every $25
[01:18:53.780 --> 01:19:12.180]  donation is a chance to win. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:19:24.100 --> 01:19:28.180]  Well
[01:19:31.620 --> 01:19:40.420]  ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick yet. I was blindsided but now I can see your
[01:19:40.420 --> 01:19:48.820]  hands. You put the beer in my pockets, took the money from my hands. Ain't gonna fool me with that
[01:19:48.820 --> 01:19:56.260]  same old trick. Okay we are back Randy Kelton Brett Fountain and on the break we were discussing
[01:19:56.260 --> 01:20:01.860]  how we've got three segments and three callers. We need to dump Scott like a hot rock and Brett
[01:20:01.860 --> 01:20:06.420]  said there's no reason to say that because he's not going out on the air and he can't hear you.
[01:20:07.540 --> 01:20:12.980]  So Scott we do need to move along a little bit we're going to run out of time.
[01:20:12.980 --> 01:20:23.220]  Come on tell us about this Chinese guy and oh well the only okay we'll fine I'll just wrap it up right
[01:20:23.220 --> 01:20:29.380]  here then since Eric Swalwell got busted online he or busted for hanging out with Fang Fang there
[01:20:29.380 --> 01:20:35.060]  the Chinese spy he just got booted off the intel community today since there's only five
[01:20:35.060 --> 01:20:43.300]  uh democrats that are in the race is so close for the house on the democrat side because they
[01:20:43.300 --> 01:20:49.380]  lost so many seats they only take five votes to flip it to a republican house now the air and if
[01:20:49.380 --> 01:20:54.580]  Eric Swalwell gets booted out of congress it's only going to take four people to swing it it'll
[01:20:54.580 --> 01:21:00.740]  be a solid republican house republican senate and then we got trump in there I had some other
[01:21:00.740 --> 01:21:05.300]  stuff but go ahead and take your other calls I'll let y'all go bye thank you Scott come back
[01:21:05.300 --> 01:21:15.780]  tomorrow night we got more time okay now we're going to Tina in California hello Tina what do
[01:21:15.780 --> 01:21:24.180]  you have for us today um well a couple things and one I always enjoy listening to what God has to
[01:21:24.180 --> 01:21:31.540]  say and today you know oh no don't say that he's already got too big a head
[01:21:35.060 --> 01:21:39.140]  well you know it's kind of refreshing to talk to someone with a little common sense because you
[01:21:39.140 --> 01:21:44.580]  know I'm in comifolia and we don't have a lot of those people here especially you know this
[01:21:44.580 --> 01:21:50.500]  Swalwell guy and you know I tell you it gets worse and worse and news them and all this
[01:21:50.500 --> 01:21:59.700]  blocking us down so you know I like to hear a little refreshing news uh but anyway I my update
[01:21:59.700 --> 01:22:07.060]  on uh one of my cases I was trying to reopen my 2014 bankruptcy to prove fraud upon the court
[01:22:07.060 --> 01:22:16.180]  by the bank because you know now I have the you know fraud to show and um I'd had to submit
[01:22:16.180 --> 01:22:27.380]  it to supplemental briefs to the judge and we had the um you know hearing today and this was you
[01:22:27.380 --> 01:22:37.380]  know the last time I met with her I was underconfident I was represented by a worthless attorney
[01:22:38.100 --> 01:22:45.940]  and she was pretty mean um and she still kind of has that look better but I listened to what
[01:22:45.940 --> 01:22:50.900]  she had to say and she said you have anything to say because she was saying we really you know
[01:22:50.900 --> 01:22:56.020]  bankruptcy is limited we don't I really don't have the jurisdiction and I don't understand why
[01:22:56.020 --> 01:23:02.820]  she doesn't have the jurisdiction to reopen a case for fraud upon the court but I listened and
[01:23:02.820 --> 01:23:08.340]  then I said um yes I do have a prepared statement that I would like to read with your permission
[01:23:08.340 --> 01:23:15.300]  and she let me read it and she said well um I must compliment you on your
[01:23:16.180 --> 01:23:22.180]  presentation preparation and writing for a proofsay litigant um it was very good
[01:23:23.380 --> 01:23:31.940]  that's praise indeed for someone and uh then I but she said you know my my um decision still
[01:23:31.940 --> 01:23:37.060]  stands this all belongs in state court you need to go to state court because that's where you're
[01:23:37.060 --> 01:23:42.980]  going to get a fair hearing and adjust and I didn't say anything because obviously I hadn't
[01:23:42.980 --> 01:23:49.300]  had a fair hearing uh results in state court it's been the exact opposite and she just kept
[01:23:49.300 --> 01:23:56.420]  insisting I needed to be in state court um so then I said may I ask one more question your honor
[01:23:57.140 --> 01:24:06.260]  and she said go ahead and I said isn't submitting a fraudulent proof of claim into bankruptcy court
[01:24:06.260 --> 01:24:11.140]  a violation of law and she said I'm not going to discuss that with you
[01:24:14.180 --> 01:24:23.300]  so that was interesting yeah she had that is interesting you you put her right square on a
[01:24:23.300 --> 01:24:33.300]  legal dime touched a nerve did you the next logical question is as a magistrate
[01:24:33.300 --> 01:24:43.300]  also since every federal judge is also a federal magistrate is it not your duty when you have it
[01:24:43.300 --> 01:24:49.940]  made known to you that a crime has been committed to hold an examining trial and make a determination
[01:24:49.940 --> 01:25:01.300]  of probable cause hmm that probably wouldn't get you a christmas card from her probably not
[01:25:01.300 --> 01:25:05.540]  and uh I really can tell you because I was watching her because we were on zoom
[01:25:07.060 --> 01:25:15.220]  and you know she was you know she's very concerned looking and but when she praised me which you
[01:25:15.220 --> 01:25:22.580]  know all thanks to you guys for giving me this confidence to prepare and you know I stated my
[01:25:22.580 --> 01:25:31.620]  cage very you know calmly but firmly and you know I stated you know that and in fact my final
[01:25:31.620 --> 01:25:41.300]  that paragraph to her um was um you know once we have proven this uh that this proof of claim
[01:25:41.300 --> 01:25:46.740]  was invalid and false then I can file an adversary complaint according to bankruptcy rules and that's
[01:25:46.740 --> 01:25:52.020]  for financial remedy there however this is the only court that can let me prove that both you
[01:25:52.020 --> 01:25:57.140]  your honor this court and myself were intentionally defrauded I can take it from there into the
[01:25:57.140 --> 01:26:03.060]  adversary proceeding I fully understand that this remedy is totally at your discretion and I hope
[01:26:03.060 --> 01:26:09.060]  that you are concerned enough to allow this to move forward to show that you do not allow fraud
[01:26:09.060 --> 01:26:14.500]  in your courtroom by anyone I lost everything I worked my whole life for because of fraud your
[01:26:14.500 --> 01:26:22.180]  honor don't you think this is worth looking into and uh that's when she said you know I was very
[01:26:22.180 --> 01:26:28.020]  well prepared and presented well but she was going to stand by a decision but that question I asked
[01:26:28.020 --> 01:26:34.500]  right at the end it's now on record and I'm going to get the transcript from this today and then
[01:26:34.500 --> 01:26:40.900]  you know we'll see where I go next but when I look at the bankruptcy rules a filing of
[01:26:40.900 --> 01:26:44.580]  false proof of play claim I believe is a felony
[01:26:47.700 --> 01:26:54.980]  have you considered filing criminal charges against these actors with the special agent
[01:26:54.980 --> 01:27:04.660]  in charge of the local FBI well I haven't got there we're working on um Texas one and going
[01:27:04.660 --> 01:27:11.860]  after criminal charges against the attorneys here in Texas and then I will have to do that
[01:27:12.580 --> 01:27:19.380]  because there's so many crimes that have been committed as I'm learning over these years and
[01:27:19.380 --> 01:27:26.500]  I I had no idea when I was first doing this because I was terrified of doing it but these
[01:27:26.500 --> 01:27:34.900]  were crimes it's only recently that it's come that way and um you know Brett found something the
[01:27:34.900 --> 01:27:42.660]  other night that I'm reading and trying to wrap my head around and it's where a judge that it is
[01:27:42.660 --> 01:27:51.860]  California um should bar grieve an attorney if he does wrong what what's that wording uh Brett
[01:27:51.860 --> 01:28:00.980]  done that bar grieve an attorney if he does wrong say that again the thing you found for me um
[01:28:01.700 --> 01:28:10.180]  oh and the cannons of judicial conduct that a judge is it's his duty to if he is aware of
[01:28:10.820 --> 01:28:19.060]  something that was a violation that an attorney violated the attorney rules of ethics then that
[01:28:19.060 --> 01:28:27.940]  judge who becomes aware of it has a duty according to the rules of his judicial conduct the judge
[01:28:27.940 --> 01:28:34.020]  needs to go bar grieve the attorney or take some kind of appropriate action if he thinks that the
[01:28:34.020 --> 01:28:38.740]  attorney acted this way because he has a drug problem then he then the appropriate action is
[01:28:38.740 --> 01:28:46.260]  not to bar grieve him but to go sign him up for some drug rehab or something but he needs to take
[01:28:46.260 --> 01:28:59.220]  some appropriate action and how often do they do that you know so I thought that was a very
[01:28:59.220 --> 01:29:06.580]  interesting I'd never seen seen that before but I think it's worth looking into to ask these judges
[01:29:06.580 --> 01:29:17.140]  why they're not doing it maybe maybe file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge for not doing
[01:29:17.140 --> 01:29:31.140]  it right there you go yeah and the cannon right before that that was cannon 3d subsection 2 and
[01:29:31.140 --> 01:29:37.300]  one says that it also applies the same way with another judge so from judge to judge if a judge
[01:29:37.300 --> 01:29:42.580]  becomes aware of another judge's impropriety violation of the judicial conducts then
[01:29:44.260 --> 01:29:48.980]  they need to go and file a judicial misconduct complaint against the other judge
[01:29:50.420 --> 01:29:52.500]  which they know how often do you think they do that
[01:29:52.500 --> 01:29:59.620]  this they certainly won't do it while we're going to our sponsors and we'll be right
[01:30:02.900 --> 01:30:09.940]  reality tv sugar obesity jet lag the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing
[01:30:09.940 --> 01:30:15.460]  but now researchers say we can add stress to the list and Dr. Kaepernald breaks back the details
[01:30:15.460 --> 01:30:21.780]  in a moment privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back
[01:30:21.780 --> 01:30:28.020]  again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so protect
[01:30:28.020 --> 01:30:34.500]  your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging
[01:30:34.500 --> 01:30:40.260]  on to this message is brought to you by start page dot com the private search engine alternative to
[01:30:40.260 --> 01:30:48.260]  google yahoo and bing start over with start page are you always on the go and juggling multiple
[01:30:48.260 --> 01:30:54.100]  projects if so you might think that multitasking proves you're smart but think again all that
[01:30:54.100 --> 01:30:59.620]  stress might be eating your brain a new study finds stress reduces the number of connections
[01:30:59.620 --> 01:31:05.060]  between neurons which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems researchers at
[01:31:05.060 --> 01:31:10.820]  Yale university found that stressed out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex
[01:31:10.820 --> 01:31:15.620]  that's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions
[01:31:15.620 --> 01:31:20.900]  so take a deep breath and chill out it'll help keep your mind as sharp as attack
[01:31:21.540 --> 01:31:26.260]  i'm dr katharine albrecht for start page dot com the world's most private search engine
[01:31:31.300 --> 01:31:36.740]  this is building seven a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of september 11
[01:31:36.740 --> 01:31:42.260]  the government says that fire brought it down however 1500 architects and engineers have concluded
[01:31:42.260 --> 01:31:46.580]  it was a controlled demolition over 6000 my fellow service members have given their lives
[01:31:46.580 --> 01:31:51.380]  of thousands of my fellow first responders of dying i'm not a conspiracy theorist structural
[01:31:51.380 --> 01:31:55.540]  engineer i'm a new york city correction officer i'm an air force pilot i'm a father who lost his
[01:31:55.540 --> 01:32:01.140]  son we're americans and we deserve the truth go to rememberbuilding seven dot org today
[01:32:02.900 --> 01:32:07.300]  rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar in today's america we live in
[01:32:07.300 --> 01:32:11.300]  an us against them society if we the people are ever going to have a free society and we're going to
[01:32:11.300 --> 01:32:15.460]  have to stand and defend our own rights among those rights are the right to travel freely
[01:32:15.460 --> 01:32:19.140]  from place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right
[01:32:19.140 --> 01:32:23.860]  to due process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to
[01:32:23.860 --> 01:32:28.020]  enforce and preserve our rights through due process former sheriff's deputy eddie craig in
[01:32:28.020 --> 01:32:31.860]  conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.860 --> 01:32:36.340]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law you can
[01:32:36.340 --> 01:32:40.580]  get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule of law radio dot com and ordering
[01:32:40.580 --> 01:32:44.580]  your copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation
[01:32:44.580 --> 01:32:49.380]  code the law versus the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research
[01:32:49.380 --> 01:32:53.060]  documents and further useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with the help
[01:32:53.060 --> 01:32:57.540]  of this material from rule of law radio dot com order your copy today and together we can have
[01:32:57.540 --> 01:33:05.940]  free society we all want and deserve you are listening to the logos radio network logos
[01:33:05.940 --> 01:33:11.380]  radio network dot com
[01:33:35.940 --> 01:33:51.940]  okay we are back brandy kelton brett fountain rule of law radio and we're talking to teen
[01:33:51.940 --> 01:34:00.340]  in california tina you had you said you had two issues um well no um that was the the main one
[01:34:00.340 --> 01:34:06.660]  uh there's my bankruptcy and then talking about what brett found because i'm really seeing now
[01:34:06.660 --> 01:34:17.300]  that we we have to try to ensure um that we get this texas thing uh as tight as possible
[01:34:17.940 --> 01:34:25.620]  to ensure we we get the best chance possible um you know and i was reading something he found
[01:34:25.620 --> 01:34:33.460]  to hear uh about uh disqualifying emotion to disqualify a district attorney from perform
[01:34:33.460 --> 01:34:40.580]  performing and not authorized duty um so there's some really really really interesting stuff that
[01:34:40.580 --> 01:34:48.580]  i'll have to attack in california but if we can get this texas one done and a couple of the
[01:34:48.580 --> 01:34:54.020]  attorneys and notary's done at the same time in texas i think we're going to start making some
[01:34:54.020 --> 01:35:00.820]  headway i do too and i think you know i filed against the governor and i haven't heard a word
[01:35:00.820 --> 01:35:07.140]  from the prosecutor they just called me told me they were going to give it to the grand jury in
[01:35:07.140 --> 01:35:16.020]  january but uh apparently you've heard a lot from them they see your case as something important to
[01:35:16.020 --> 01:35:25.700]  them and effectively he's asking tina for a uh power part presentation for the grand jury so
[01:35:25.700 --> 01:35:33.780]  we're working on putting something together if you want like like if you go to your legislators
[01:35:33.780 --> 01:35:40.420]  and you want your legislature to legislate or to do something for you you have to do all the
[01:35:40.420 --> 01:35:46.980]  homework for him you can't go to him and say i need you to fix this and expect him to expend
[01:35:47.940 --> 01:35:55.780]  his resources to do all your research for you you have to do it for him so this lawyer has
[01:35:55.780 --> 01:36:04.580]  asked tina to bring him what he needs to be able to present this to the grand jury and i'm really
[01:36:04.580 --> 01:36:10.420]  amazed that he did that because you know he's telling her i'm busy i don't have time to do this
[01:36:10.420 --> 01:36:18.900]  but this is important enough we need it so uh we'll try to get this out this weekend yeah definitely
[01:36:20.980 --> 01:36:26.420]  okay okay well i'll let you go to the other callers and uh i'll check in with you tomorrow
[01:36:26.420 --> 01:36:34.580]  okay thank you tina now we're going to ervin in nevada hello ervin oh hello uh just a second
[01:36:34.580 --> 01:36:40.020]  now you are in my database but i don't remember hearing from you in a long time
[01:36:40.980 --> 01:36:47.780]  that is correct um a couple years ago and i uh came across a video of yours i mean the
[01:36:47.780 --> 01:36:57.300]  call of yours on youtube from may of last year um and uh i found it very interesting um and by the
[01:36:57.300 --> 01:37:02.500]  way tina was on that call i um her voice is very distinctive very pleasant and i heard her in some
[01:37:02.500 --> 01:37:10.100]  yeah we we pick on her because she speaks with this strange foreign accent now now
[01:37:10.100 --> 01:37:16.980]  now she's obviously a foreigner she's not from texas
[01:37:18.420 --> 01:37:25.460]  no i think that will establish um yeah so tina's accent is absolutely delightful
[01:37:26.420 --> 01:37:30.260]  so there you go that is i thought you were about to get her to call you churlish
[01:37:30.260 --> 01:37:42.180]  yeah well the show that you had in may 28th uh you brought up um the uh concept of the private
[01:37:42.180 --> 01:37:48.340]  attorney general uh with a fellow i think his name is oliver this might not be correct and um
[01:37:48.340 --> 01:37:54.340]  you mentioned you were interested or you thought that trying to get a declaratory judgment um
[01:37:54.340 --> 01:38:02.420]  um given to the um petitioner might be the way to go and i think at some point you mentioned
[01:38:02.420 --> 01:38:06.580]  that the kind of administrative procedure against public officials i think at that time because of
[01:38:06.580 --> 01:38:14.020]  your um opposition to mass wearing well uh when i was listening to some archived shows from several
[01:38:14.020 --> 01:38:22.820]  years ago that's where i first heard tina's voice um the experts there um they put forth the notion
[01:38:22.820 --> 01:38:29.540]  that if one files a writ of corrento you can only use that not for money damages but for
[01:38:29.540 --> 01:38:35.940]  either challenging someone's standing to have office uh for someone who exceeded their authority
[01:38:35.940 --> 01:38:41.220]  or kind of like a misprisoned felony if they were aware of something that was criminal and
[01:38:41.220 --> 01:38:48.260]  didn't act upon it and um the fear was put forth by one of the gentlemen was that uh you send that
[01:38:48.260 --> 01:38:54.340]  to the attorney general of the state in question and he or she has 60 days inside where they
[01:38:54.340 --> 01:38:59.300]  want to pursue it and if they do not pursue it they claimed that you then had the right
[01:39:00.100 --> 01:39:05.940]  to um become the private attorney general with all the powers they're in uh and even the host
[01:39:05.940 --> 01:39:10.100]  of the show said yeah but how do you enforce that and the fellow kind of said well you know
[01:39:10.100 --> 01:39:13.620]  citizens are at yada yada yada and so i don't know if that's just an interesting theoretical
[01:39:13.620 --> 01:39:22.340]  episode i mean sorry but i have i have a lot of people calling in and you'll notice that when
[01:39:22.340 --> 01:39:31.060]  someone calls in and they start making proactive statements of law out of their own mouth then
[01:39:31.060 --> 01:39:40.180]  i start working them over it's one of it's one of my rules don't come in here and tell me you can be
[01:39:40.180 --> 01:39:46.660]  a private attorney general unless you can show me either code or case law that establishes that
[01:39:47.380 --> 01:39:57.940]  the only thing i can find on a private attorney general action is that this is a name that the
[01:39:57.940 --> 01:40:07.220]  courts have given a certain kind of action that they will allow let's say you get a ticket and you
[01:40:07.220 --> 01:40:14.580]  get that ticket in a way that is unconstitutional and patently illegal but it's only a ticket
[01:40:16.020 --> 01:40:23.620]  i mean yeah it's wrong but man i got a life to live i don't have time or money it's been
[01:40:23.620 --> 01:40:31.860]  thousands and thousands of dollars to take on a ticket issue so the courts have said that in this
[01:40:31.860 --> 01:40:41.540]  kind of situation you can file an action for yourself and all others similarly situated
[01:40:42.500 --> 01:40:49.220]  and they call that kind of suit a private attorney general suit and then these patriot
[01:40:49.220 --> 01:40:54.900]  mythologists have taken that to mean you can be a private attorney general they grab that up and
[01:40:54.900 --> 01:41:02.980]  they run with it and okay you can grab it and run with it but i need more law than that show me
[01:41:02.980 --> 01:41:10.660]  something that may gives you even get a vicious standing and i can't find it oh i did see something
[01:41:10.660 --> 01:41:17.140]  that indicated that you could uh do it under um some civil rights violations specifically but
[01:41:17.140 --> 01:41:22.500]  you just mentioned the traffic situation and i had that very thing um first all right my wife
[01:41:22.500 --> 01:41:29.860]  three years ago got a ticket um and first of all i he sent it back in three days with no
[01:41:29.860 --> 01:41:36.020]  notary and certified and all that uh but of course they ignored it um and the ticket i noticed when
[01:41:36.020 --> 01:41:40.100]  she got it i wasn't there when she got the ticket didn't have her signature and i thought that was
[01:41:40.100 --> 01:41:44.580]  strange and she said the cop was all rather apologetic and maybe he just didn't want to
[01:41:44.580 --> 01:41:51.140]  decide it um so eventually they put a bench warrant for her and i went to get that and they
[01:41:51.140 --> 01:41:57.860]  said oh no we don't give those out i said really okay um so that was three years ago and subsequently
[01:41:57.860 --> 01:42:04.500]  i found out from that very same show i mentioned before that uh supposedly a warrant that's more
[01:42:04.500 --> 01:42:11.060]  than 60 days over six days old it's stale uh you know this is right to a speedy trial that's
[01:42:11.060 --> 01:42:16.980]  that's one factor but okay so that was she got that ticket approximately in april of 2017
[01:42:16.980 --> 01:42:23.700]  it's still on the you know on the book so to speak and late august last year i was driving
[01:42:23.700 --> 01:42:28.020]  uh driving with her and i got a ticket in the same city henderson we both live in las vegas
[01:42:28.020 --> 01:42:34.100]  which borders henderson and so the cop gives me this electric gizmo and tells me to sign it and
[01:42:34.100 --> 01:42:39.060]  it has a very skinny window we have to sign with your finger and no you know without purchasing
[01:42:39.060 --> 01:42:44.740]  that stuff but for what it's worth i signed my name with vc and which is some issues with some
[01:42:44.740 --> 01:42:50.740]  fancy latin phrase it means under the rare system such thing and so once i did that the gizmo spit
[01:42:50.740 --> 01:42:55.220]  out the ticket and i saw it and he didn't have my signature you know i just signed on the window
[01:42:55.220 --> 01:43:00.740]  so now i understood what happened with my wife okay now i sent that back within three days as well
[01:43:00.740 --> 01:43:09.380]  again certified mail with no reason witness and the court got it on on august first and they
[01:43:09.380 --> 01:43:15.300]  didn't put it into the record until august 15 exactly two weeks later you know nothing happened
[01:43:15.300 --> 01:43:19.780]  they just refused to put it there so they tried to see if i am trying to show us if i was late
[01:43:19.780 --> 01:43:26.260]  with with responding and so i uh just as i did with my wife by the way i challenged jurisdiction
[01:43:26.260 --> 01:43:33.780]  that went for batements and all that uh and they just ignored it um and a warrant for me
[01:43:33.780 --> 01:43:45.700]  was issued on october 1st oh wonderful okay hang on hang on we'll pick this up on the other side
[01:43:46.340 --> 01:43:51.700]  randy kelton brett fountain ruler ral radio uh won't give out the call in number we're going
[01:43:51.700 --> 01:43:56.500]  to our last segment and we'll finish it out with this one uh we'll be right back
[01:43:56.500 --> 01:44:04.740]  are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even lawsuits
[01:44:05.300 --> 01:44:10.900]  stop debt collectors now with the michael miras proven method michael miras has won six cases
[01:44:10.900 --> 01:44:15.700]  in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too you'll get step by step
[01:44:15.700 --> 01:44:21.300]  instructions in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute what to do
[01:44:21.300 --> 01:44:26.900]  when contacted by phones mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get
[01:44:26.900 --> 01:44:32.340]  debt collectors out of your credit reports how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay
[01:44:32.340 --> 01:44:38.580]  you to go away the michael miras proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[01:44:38.580 --> 01:44:43.780]  personal consultation is available as well for more information please visit rule of law radio
[01:44:43.780 --> 01:44:50.020]  dot com and click on the blue michael miras banner or email michael miras at yahoo dot com that's rule
[01:44:50.020 --> 01:44:58.660]  of law radio dot com or email m i c h a e l m i r r a s at yahoo dot com to learn how to stop debt
[01:44:58.660 --> 01:45:06.020]  collectors next are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney
[01:45:06.020 --> 01:45:12.020]  with jurist dictionary the affordable easy to understand four cd course that will show you
[01:45:12.020 --> 01:45:19.860]  how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't
[01:45:19.860 --> 01:45:26.100]  have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our step by step course
[01:45:26.100 --> 01:45:32.900]  and now you can too jurisdiction area was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[01:45:32.900 --> 01:45:39.060]  winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.060 --> 01:45:44.660]  about the principles and practices that control our american courts you'll receive our audio
[01:45:44.660 --> 01:45:53.140]  classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases pro se tactics and much more please visit
[01:45:53.140 --> 01:46:10.820]  rule of law radio dot com and click on the banner are called toll free 866 law easy
[01:46:23.700 --> 01:46:29.540]  in this world i will never understand something i realize
[01:46:40.020 --> 01:46:47.380]  there's always room at the top of the head here through the great mind and it's lonely
[01:46:47.380 --> 01:46:55.300]  feel they're wishing it was more than opposition to fail they know that if they don't do it
[01:46:56.020 --> 01:47:02.900]  okay we are back randy calton brett fountain rule of law radio on this
[01:47:02.900 --> 01:47:08.900]  thursday the 10th day of december 2020 and we're talking to urban in nevada
[01:47:08.900 --> 01:47:18.260]  moving you're speaking to what sounds like a perfect private attorney general suit this is
[01:47:18.260 --> 01:47:26.100]  something we're finding in a lot of other places where the traffic courts now are manipulating
[01:47:26.100 --> 01:47:34.260]  their dockets so as to be able to issue warrants and now it puts you in a position to where you'll
[01:47:34.260 --> 01:47:39.780]  almost certainly make a deal with him yeah well by the way i've got to mention that
[01:47:39.780 --> 01:47:46.020]  my wife's ticket was in henderson justice court mine was in henderson municipal court same building
[01:47:46.020 --> 01:47:51.700]  same address but two different courts and i pulled the oath for her so-called judge and turned out
[01:47:51.700 --> 01:47:56.980]  the guy's a justice of peace and i didn't know judge my guy is not only a judge he's the head
[01:47:56.980 --> 01:48:02.660]  judge of the municipal court but i got his oath and i actually had three old spread over about
[01:48:02.660 --> 01:48:07.620]  10 years and he signed his name in different ways at different times and even that's supposed to be
[01:48:07.620 --> 01:48:12.260]  something in themselves anyway so i did the whole thing with the abatement ignored the warrant was
[01:48:12.260 --> 01:48:18.420]  issued on october 1st and i sent i pulled out a criminal an affidavit of criminal complaint
[01:48:20.260 --> 01:48:25.540]  since he ignored everything and oh by the way i have to say the warrant um in december that's
[01:48:25.540 --> 01:48:33.700]  the year ago i had my sister and a friend i may go into the court to try to get the wife
[01:48:33.700 --> 01:48:38.980]  the warrant for my wife and myself my wife they fatally refused it so that's prior to
[01:48:38.980 --> 01:48:42.580]  terry or confidential whatever they just wouldn't give it then they went to get mine and they
[01:48:42.580 --> 01:48:48.420]  uh they resisted but they eventually got it the warrant is like a grand slam of voidness
[01:48:48.420 --> 01:48:55.060]  number one it's not signed not by the clerk not by the judge number two out sealed by the court
[01:48:56.180 --> 01:49:01.700]  number three there's no affidavit of probable cause and number four as i said that was issued
[01:49:01.700 --> 01:49:06.820]  october 1st so by december it was already more than late december this was was already um
[01:49:06.820 --> 01:49:12.020]  160 days old um so it should be stale and for good measure i um we're all senior citizens so i'm
[01:49:12.020 --> 01:49:18.020]  pretty sure i'm about to talk about that's even a little faster so okay uh that's the that judge i
[01:49:18.020 --> 01:49:22.340]  sent a criminal an affidavit of criminal complaint to the state the attorney general who stayed in
[01:49:22.340 --> 01:49:29.620]  nevada and initially he ignored it and i sent a second one and then i got a call oh i got a visit
[01:49:29.620 --> 01:49:37.220]  from two policemen from henderson uh at my house and i said holy
[01:49:37.220 --> 01:49:42.660]  a uh in central conversation so you're not in any trouble and i said then i don't wish to talk with
[01:49:42.660 --> 01:49:46.740]  you if you have anything to say you can put it in writing and the one cop said come on joe he's not
[01:49:46.740 --> 01:49:52.980]  going to cooperate if they stalked off and then i got a call from someone from the fbi two days
[01:49:52.980 --> 01:49:57.700]  after that a claim to be from the fbi and the same thing i said i don't do business over phone so
[01:49:57.700 --> 01:50:02.420]  he's something writing then we'll talk never heard from him again so the as i said the attorney
[01:50:02.420 --> 01:50:08.260]  generally otherwise ignored me now uh one of the two people i said my sister went to get the warrant
[01:50:08.260 --> 01:50:16.740]  in may um in december in january may got a ticket but in las vegas not henderson and the cop took
[01:50:16.740 --> 01:50:22.180]  her license plate because i even heard one of these you know non-commercial places and um he just
[01:50:22.180 --> 01:50:27.780]  signed his ticket tj his initials and he didn't have her sign at all and i was puzzled by that
[01:50:27.780 --> 01:50:33.460]  uh it wasn't a spit out thing and i found out that october 1st of last year the car county
[01:50:34.820 --> 01:50:41.300]  passed a thing saying that the they no longer have to get uh the signature of someone with a ticket
[01:50:41.300 --> 01:50:47.060]  and by the way misdemeanors are considered to be crimes in the states not just you know
[01:50:47.060 --> 01:50:54.340]  an ordinance violation so uh may has a ticket as well but that around that time covid hit
[01:50:54.340 --> 01:50:58.180]  and they've been postponing it in the sense of a sense of a sense and i found the stuff for her
[01:50:58.180 --> 01:51:05.460]  too so i figured um the attorney general has ignored us we have three people which i don't know
[01:51:05.460 --> 01:51:09.780]  you can make maybe i mean it seems to me that might be a what do you call the civil rico um so
[01:51:09.780 --> 01:51:15.940]  it seems to be a conspiracy and they're just ignoring um all over the place okay okay wait
[01:51:15.940 --> 01:51:26.260]  in that on that topic in texas we have walker v what is it brett i want to say walker v packer
[01:51:26.260 --> 01:51:32.900]  but that's not right where a judge has no discretion yes yeah i think that's uh
[01:51:36.340 --> 01:51:42.180]  discretion now i don't know we'll we'll figure it out a minute but what the case says a judge
[01:51:42.180 --> 01:51:50.500]  has no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts a failure to do so is an abuse of
[01:51:50.500 --> 01:51:57.780]  discretion and an abuse of discretion and this this part's not in the case and what it goes on
[01:51:57.780 --> 01:52:04.820]  to say is the only thing you can appeal is an abuse of discretion that's the only thing that's
[01:52:04.820 --> 01:52:14.980]  appealable but yeah it is walker v packer walker v packer if a judge commits abuse of discretion
[01:52:14.980 --> 01:52:21.460]  and in the process denies you the phone free access to your enjoyment of a right well that's
[01:52:21.460 --> 01:52:28.580]  crime in every state in texas it's official oppression and the fed it's 18 us code 242
[01:52:28.580 --> 01:52:38.020]  the ku klux klan act we all are familiar for the most part with 42 us code 1983 that's the one that
[01:52:38.020 --> 01:52:45.700]  allows you to sue public officials well that's the second part of the ku klux klan act the first
[01:52:45.700 --> 01:52:52.420]  part of the ku klux klan act was 18 us code 242 which makes it a crime to not to deny someone
[01:52:52.420 --> 01:53:00.900]  due process so you file all these documents the judge ignores them you should get a criminal
[01:53:00.900 --> 01:53:09.460]  complaint for each issue in each motion separate criminal complaint judicial conduct complaint
[01:53:09.460 --> 01:53:23.860]  and bar grievance that'll jerk a knot in his professional behind yeah i i knew you were
[01:53:23.860 --> 01:53:28.340]  enthusiastic when i heard your first movie five years ago if i'm going you know after the judge
[01:53:28.340 --> 01:53:34.260]  and making them nervous oh i'd love going after judges they're my favorite target
[01:53:34.260 --> 01:53:44.180]  you they are the problem and they think you're up there immune we had we asked one judge for
[01:53:44.180 --> 01:53:50.500]  findings of fact and conclusions at law and the rules said that when you make that request
[01:53:50.500 --> 01:53:57.540]  the judge shall produce findings of fact and conclusions at law within 20 days if he fails
[01:53:57.540 --> 01:54:04.100]  to do so you can file a notice of late filing and he has 10 more days on the 21st day we
[01:54:04.100 --> 01:54:09.540]  filed a notice of late filing and then we file criminal charges official impression with the
[01:54:09.540 --> 01:54:19.700]  grand jury i bet he didn't see that coming wow okay well um you were almost out of time
[01:54:20.740 --> 01:54:25.220]  you have a show tomorrow night too is that right yes we have a four hour show tomorrow
[01:54:25.220 --> 01:54:30.900]  night so we'll have a lot more time well um but you think that this might be a case where
[01:54:30.900 --> 01:54:35.860]  and by the way um am i wrong assuming that the this is that the attorney general since
[01:54:35.860 --> 01:54:39.700]  and he chose to completely ignore me and and i mean only that but you try to you know stick
[01:54:39.700 --> 01:54:46.500]  some alone for some people to intimidate me that um he so filed against the attorney general
[01:54:47.700 --> 01:54:51.780]  you know when you said you filed against a judge in this city and they sent to
[01:54:52.980 --> 01:54:59.860]  municipal police out to talk to you uh you should have given them an opportunity to say
[01:54:59.860 --> 01:55:05.140]  so file the affidavit of criminal complaint um and send it to the attorney general now it's
[01:55:05.140 --> 01:55:08.820]  my understanding that you know when someone does that does that they're at least supposed to give
[01:55:08.820 --> 01:55:12.580]  some consideration needs to give the courtesy of an answer you investigate it i mean i i swung
[01:55:12.580 --> 01:55:16.980]  the penalty perjury and no answer and then if he didn't answer and that's when i got the
[01:55:16.980 --> 01:55:22.180]  visit then she left the session from the two guys and then two days later calls and going
[01:55:22.180 --> 01:55:29.380]  to the FBI okay here's a way you can actually talk to them make sure you keep two recording
[01:55:29.380 --> 01:55:38.180]  devices with you fine and you go in like with your phone and you set your phone up you want
[01:55:38.180 --> 01:55:43.140]  to record this and they're going to say well if we want to record this we can't talk to you
[01:55:43.140 --> 01:55:51.460]  oh okay no problem turn it off when you turn off the first device and don't mention the one you've
[01:55:51.460 --> 01:55:59.620]  got in your pocket it seems to turn on a stupid button because then they really get stupid
[01:56:00.740 --> 01:56:07.540]  uh art patent we tell them this is a two-party state you have to tell them fortunately oh you
[01:56:07.540 --> 01:56:14.180]  know you're recording them i don't like i mean in nevada not a person but you know yeah nevada
[01:56:14.180 --> 01:56:19.220]  exactly definitely a two-party okay tell them that you're recording and then let them see the first
[01:56:19.220 --> 01:56:26.180]  one and then when you turn it off why i already told them no we're going to the legal side of this
[01:56:27.220 --> 01:56:34.020]  it's not illegal to record them it's illegal to attempt to use that recording for any purpose
[01:56:35.060 --> 01:56:40.820]  so you do the recording and then turn it into a affidavit
[01:56:40.820 --> 01:56:53.380]  ah by the way if what is worse my affidavit i recorded in the county recording office
[01:56:54.500 --> 01:57:00.580]  they won't do that they refuse slightly in nevada but in the mexico berniel burn leo what
[01:57:00.580 --> 01:57:05.220]  would be called a county they record anything and so i have an affidavit you know supposedly
[01:57:05.220 --> 01:57:11.060]  under butted and that part of the county public record so i thought that might okay there's there's
[01:57:11.060 --> 01:57:16.980]  another way to get it in the public record uh in most states the county recorder's office
[01:57:16.980 --> 01:57:24.820]  only records certain kinds of documents they say this is not a repository for people to
[01:57:24.820 --> 01:57:33.540]  save documents the only property of documents going to real property so you have a ticket
[01:57:33.540 --> 01:57:39.700]  you file that as a statement of facts in the traffic ticket now it's a
[01:57:40.820 --> 01:57:46.500]  filed affidavit in the public record what how do you get it no or that you file you file it in the
[01:57:46.500 --> 01:57:55.140]  trap in the case as a statement of facts attached to some motion or some pleading right now you've
[01:57:55.140 --> 01:58:00.980]  got your affidavit on the record but call him tomorrow night this is something i'd like to
[01:58:00.980 --> 01:58:05.860]  address thank you very much thank you very good evening you may have a really good suit
[01:58:06.740 --> 01:58:14.740]  and bret sure bret you had a question you've got 10 seconds goodbye we'll get to it tomorrow night
[01:58:17.140 --> 01:58:24.660]  okay thank you all for listening this is brandy falton brett fountain on this the 10th day of
[01:58:24.660 --> 01:58:34.660]  of December 2020 and my clock just went out. So bring us up, Brett.
[01:58:34.660 --> 01:58:41.660]  So I've got time to ask a question. If you can't see your clock.
[01:58:41.660 --> 01:58:45.660]  Yeah, I got it. You've got 10 seconds.
[01:58:45.660 --> 01:58:48.660]  We can talk about it another time.
[01:58:48.660 --> 01:58:50.660]  Thank you for listening.
[01:58:50.660 --> 01:58:57.660]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.660 --> 01:59:04.660]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.660 --> 01:59:08.660]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.660 --> 01:59:11.660]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.660 --> 01:59:20.660]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.660 --> 01:59:27.660]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps
[01:59:27.660 --> 01:59:32.660]  and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.660 --> 01:59:40.660]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.660 --> 01:59:49.660]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.