ROL_2020-10-23_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.840]  The following news flashes brought to you by The Low Star Lowdown.
[00:06.840 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.440]  Silver $16.45 an ounce, Copper $2.75 an ounce, Oil, Texas Crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent Crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.800]  $62.47 a barrel, and Cryptos in order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.800 --> 00:41.520]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.520 --> 00:52.480]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.480 --> 00:57.840]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[00:57.840 --> 01:04.840]  10 and injuring 40.
[01:04.840 --> 01:05.840]  And recent news.
[01:05.840 --> 01:10.520]  Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hemp and attacks his law back
[01:10.520 --> 01:15.080]  in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin and San Antonio
[01:15.080 --> 01:19.200]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they
[01:19.200 --> 01:23.280]  are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the
[01:23.280 --> 01:28.000]  law for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this
[01:28.000 --> 01:32.960]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of
[01:32.960 --> 01:33.960]  the law.
[01:33.960 --> 01:37.680]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.680 --> 01:42.160]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.160 --> 01:48.320]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.320 --> 01:54.560]  well as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.560 --> 01:59.040]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:59.040 --> 02:01.920]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.920 --> 02:06.840]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.840 --> 02:10.840]  in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.840 --> 02:13.560]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.560 --> 02:17.440]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.440 --> 02:18.960]  charged with.
[02:18.960 --> 02:27.480]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark.
[02:27.480 --> 02:32.400]  As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.400 --> 02:38.040]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.040 --> 02:39.520]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.520 --> 02:43.840]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:43.840 --> 02:50.120]  its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.120 --> 03:15.960]  glow because of bookroading with your low down for July 22, 2019.
[03:15.960 --> 03:29.120]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rula Law Radio, and we're talking to Tina in California.
[03:29.120 --> 03:35.320]  And I went to that story for a reason, but I lost track of why I went to that story.
[03:35.320 --> 03:43.520]  Anyway, I was going to the district of court in Travis County for the purpose of going
[03:43.520 --> 03:52.280]  directly to the grand jury, because the last time I was there, when you walk in the doorway
[03:52.280 --> 03:57.280]  on your left side are elevators, but on the right, there was a little information desk.
[03:57.280 --> 04:02.000]  And around the right side of the information desk against the wall, there's a little hallway
[04:02.000 --> 04:07.040]  that as you walk down it, there was a little indentation with two doors.
[04:07.040 --> 04:10.680]  One would face you and one would be facing the opposite direction.
[04:10.680 --> 04:15.720]  The one facing you was the door to the grand jury, the one on the opposite side was the
[04:15.720 --> 04:18.120]  district attorney's office.
[04:18.120 --> 04:23.720]  But it turned out they had built the new building for the district attorney's office.
[04:23.720 --> 04:28.120]  So I didn't go there to see the district attorney.
[04:28.120 --> 04:33.760]  I went there to present my complaints to the grand jury.
[04:33.760 --> 04:39.960]  So they instructed me that they had built a new building across the street, and the district
[04:39.960 --> 04:41.240]  attorney was in that building.
[04:41.240 --> 04:45.720]  So I went across the street, it's about an eight-story building, and it was named the
[04:45.720 --> 04:47.680]  Ron Earl building.
[04:47.680 --> 04:53.240]  Interesting, because the last time I did this, I gave my complaints to Ron Earl.
[04:53.240 --> 04:57.040]  So I went in the building and asked for the grand jury, and they sent me to the district
[04:57.040 --> 05:02.960]  attorney's office, and the assistant district attorney came out to talk to me, and he said,
[05:02.960 --> 05:03.960]  what can I do for you?
[05:03.960 --> 05:07.280]  I said, I have these criminal complaints here.
[05:07.280 --> 05:09.880]  They are against the public official.
[05:09.880 --> 05:16.240]  You are to take these complaints and give them to the grand jury.
[05:16.240 --> 05:21.440]  He said, well, I need to explain to you how the grand jury system works.
[05:21.440 --> 05:25.240]  No, you don't need to explain anything to me.
[05:25.240 --> 05:36.360]  What you need to do is take these complaints, verify my signature on this as an affidavit,
[05:36.360 --> 05:41.080]  and give it to the grand jury in accordance with your duty under Article 2.03, Texas Go-to-come
[05:41.080 --> 05:46.080]  Procedure.
[05:46.080 --> 05:47.080]  I'll be right back.
[05:47.080 --> 05:49.680]  I need to talk to my boss.
[05:49.680 --> 05:52.000]  I said, well, that's probably a good idea.
[05:52.000 --> 05:53.440]  And what is your name?
[05:53.440 --> 05:54.440]  He said, Josh.
[05:54.440 --> 05:57.240]  Oh, Josh, Josh, you have a card?
[05:57.240 --> 05:59.200]  No, I don't.
[05:59.200 --> 06:01.680]  Well, that's interesting.
[06:01.680 --> 06:06.080]  Josh, did you have a last name?
[06:06.080 --> 06:07.960]  He said, Josh will do.
[06:07.960 --> 06:13.160]  And I said, don't they give lawyers last names anymore?
[06:13.160 --> 06:15.360]  Josh will do when you walk away.
[06:15.360 --> 06:21.720]  Well, they sent out an investigator, and I gave her a hard time, but she also handled
[06:21.720 --> 06:24.600]  me very well.
[06:24.600 --> 06:29.320]  She asked if she could take this complaint and show it to her boss, I said, yes, you
[06:29.320 --> 06:32.920]  can, but you understand, I'm not here to give that to you.
[06:32.920 --> 06:35.520]  I'm here to give that to the grand jury.
[06:35.520 --> 06:36.520]  I understand.
[06:36.520 --> 06:38.160]  I will be right back.
[06:38.160 --> 06:41.280]  An hour later, she came back out.
[06:41.280 --> 06:48.440]  She said, Mr. Kelton, I will verify your signature in accordance with my authority as a certified
[06:48.440 --> 06:54.880]  peace officer in the state of Texas, and the district attorney will give your complaints
[06:54.880 --> 06:58.680]  to the grand jury.
[06:58.680 --> 07:01.360]  Works for me.
[07:01.360 --> 07:04.680]  That's how it's supposed to work.
[07:04.680 --> 07:13.640]  So when you go, when you file complaints, you file them with the grand jury, but your
[07:13.640 --> 07:21.200]  only address we ever have for a grand jury is the district attorney's office.
[07:21.200 --> 07:32.560]  So depending on the kind of difficulty you expect to have, you might mail it to them,
[07:32.560 --> 07:38.680]  but registered restricted, you know, the whole routine with the cover letter for the foreman
[07:38.680 --> 07:39.680]  and insured.
[07:39.680 --> 07:50.560]  I have a woman in Dallas that I told this to and she just insured a document she sent
[07:50.560 --> 07:56.440]  to the district, to the grand jury for $50,000.
[07:56.440 --> 08:03.640]  She hasn't received the cover letter back, now she wants her $50,000.
[08:03.640 --> 08:14.000]  Okay, okay, that's basically how you do it, more not exactly how you do it, but the idea,
[08:14.000 --> 08:16.680]  the concept of what you're doing.
[08:16.680 --> 08:20.600]  You're not reporting this to the prosecuting attorney.
[08:20.600 --> 08:23.600]  You're reporting to the grand jury.
[08:23.600 --> 08:29.200]  And if someone can facilitate your access to the grand jury, that's fine, but if anyone
[08:29.200 --> 08:35.560]  interferes with your access to the grand jury, that's witness to our jury tampering and should
[08:35.560 --> 08:40.080]  get criminal charges quickly.
[08:40.080 --> 08:45.640]  So when you bring a set of complaints to the foreman, I'm sorry, when you bring a set
[08:45.640 --> 08:51.040]  of complaints to the district attorney and it has a cover letter on it for the foreman
[08:51.040 --> 08:54.760]  of the grand jury and you don't get that cover letter back.
[08:54.760 --> 09:02.440]  The next set of complaints you bring to the grand jury is against the district attorney.
[09:02.440 --> 09:06.240]  So the district attorney is going to get those complaints and open them and they're going
[09:06.240 --> 09:11.360]  to see the complaint against the district attorney for secreting the government document
[09:11.360 --> 09:16.640]  from the person it was directed to, specifically the foreman of the grand jury.
[09:16.640 --> 09:23.520]  And now the prosecutor is going to realize that she's been set up.
[09:23.520 --> 09:26.520]  So does that all make sense, Tina?
[09:26.520 --> 09:27.520]  It does.
[09:27.520 --> 09:33.840]  And what I'm thinking now is I definitely need to get a little of your help in how to
[09:33.840 --> 09:42.200]  handle the right thing to the VA and in LA and things, but maybe I should, because I
[09:42.200 --> 09:49.080]  really want to go after the attorney who has been going against me and who hired the judge's
[09:49.080 --> 09:55.440]  daughter to babysit his young son and of course they bought anything, anything of it, but
[09:55.440 --> 10:04.840]  he coerced or at least he said that the two Texas notaries, they were not going to allow
[10:04.840 --> 10:10.080]  them to send me their notary ledgers.
[10:10.080 --> 10:12.080]  That's against the Texas law.
[10:12.080 --> 10:17.640]  And I filed complaints for the district attorney whatever didn't do anything about it.
[10:17.640 --> 10:28.120]  And they said, well, that's a private company and no, the law doesn't say the notary ledgers
[10:28.120 --> 10:29.880]  belong to the company.
[10:29.880 --> 10:37.240]  It specifically states that they don't belong to the company even if the company pays for
[10:37.240 --> 10:39.120]  the notary commission.
[10:39.120 --> 10:46.840]  They belong to the notary and must be turned over to the local, you know, recorders office.
[10:46.840 --> 10:50.080]  So maybe I should.
[10:50.080 --> 10:53.400]  Actually they belong to the secretary of state.
[10:53.400 --> 10:55.400]  Yes, they do.
[10:55.400 --> 11:00.080]  The notary holds them in trust.
[11:00.080 --> 11:04.680]  When the notary gives up her license, she is required to return those ledgers to the
[11:04.680 --> 11:07.720]  secretary of state.
[11:07.720 --> 11:08.720]  But they don't.
[11:08.720 --> 11:12.960]  So they were government documents from the beginning.
[11:12.960 --> 11:16.040]  The bank has lost them.
[11:16.040 --> 11:20.080]  The notary gave them to the bank who she worked for.
[11:20.080 --> 11:24.000]  And of course, you know, when a notary is told, oh, you've got to submit these documents
[11:24.000 --> 11:31.760]  by your employer, but this time the notary, the attorney in California said, we're not
[11:31.760 --> 11:36.800]  going to let you have the notary ledgers because it's improper discovery.
[11:36.800 --> 11:38.800]  No, it's not.
[11:38.800 --> 11:39.800]  It's in the law.
[11:39.800 --> 11:40.800]  We can have what we want.
[11:40.800 --> 11:41.800]  Okay.
[11:41.800 --> 11:42.800]  Wonderful.
[11:42.800 --> 11:43.800]  This is wonderful.
[11:43.800 --> 11:49.200]  Now you get to sue the lawyer for malpractice and make a claim against his errors and emissions
[11:49.200 --> 11:50.200]  policy.
[11:50.200 --> 11:55.520]  Well, I need help doing that because I would love to go against this guy and I would love
[11:55.520 --> 12:00.320]  to file a criminal complaint against him in Texas even though he's in California because
[12:00.320 --> 12:02.520]  he used Texas Nudary.
[12:02.520 --> 12:03.760]  You can.
[12:03.760 --> 12:12.640]  You know, if he stated that he wasn't going to let the Texas notary send you her ledger,
[12:12.640 --> 12:15.880]  then he's violated Texas law.
[12:15.880 --> 12:21.280]  In order for him to do that, he would have to contact her in Texas and that would give
[12:21.280 --> 12:28.880]  him minimum contact, sufficient minimum contacts under international shoe to bring the case
[12:28.880 --> 12:29.880]  into Texas.
[12:29.880 --> 12:40.800]  Now, he can remove it to the federal court if he wants to, or you could file against
[12:40.800 --> 12:41.800]  him.
[12:41.800 --> 12:47.720]  If he removes it to the Fed, he's going to remove it to the Fed in California and he's
[12:47.720 --> 12:52.840]  pretty well got the California judges bought and paid for.
[12:52.840 --> 13:01.040]  But if he's in California, he doesn't have the Texas judges bought and paid for.
[13:01.040 --> 13:08.320]  So you might want to file it in the Fed in Texas.
[13:08.320 --> 13:13.480]  I don't know if you can do that since you are domiciled in California.
[13:13.480 --> 13:15.920]  They would want to move it to California.
[13:15.920 --> 13:21.240]  Well, we have to figure this out because I want to get this attorney because he is a
[13:21.240 --> 13:28.480]  rotten thinking little man and he's the one who said, you just have to pay what we say
[13:28.480 --> 13:29.480]  you owe.
[13:29.480 --> 13:30.480]  Okay.
[13:30.480 --> 13:31.480]  Do you think so?
[13:31.480 --> 13:40.160]  You do the same thing when you sue him for malpractice.
[13:40.160 --> 13:46.160]  Now he already knows that you will take him on.
[13:46.160 --> 13:54.200]  So when you sue him for malpractice, you very quickly let the lawyers that the insurance
[13:54.200 --> 14:03.160]  company secures to represent this guy, you let them know, I will fight you.
[14:03.160 --> 14:07.440]  You can tell him that you're a Comanche at heart.
[14:07.440 --> 14:18.960]  Comanche in Spanish means one who will fight you all the time.
[14:18.960 --> 14:27.000]  So you guys want to have a fight, I will give you one you will not believe or pay me the
[14:27.000 --> 14:33.360]  limits of his errors and emissions policies and I'll go away and it's generally about
[14:33.360 --> 14:35.360]  a million dollars.
[14:35.360 --> 14:39.960]  That's what my house was worth.
[14:39.960 --> 14:44.240]  Or make me an offer I can't walk away from.
[14:44.240 --> 14:55.320]  He coerced two public officials to violate the law.
[14:55.320 --> 15:01.280]  He has an admission that he did so.
[15:01.280 --> 15:02.280]  Yes.
[15:02.280 --> 15:10.920]  Wait a minute, he coerced two public officials in Texas to violate the law in Texas.
[15:10.920 --> 15:11.920]  Yes.
[15:11.920 --> 15:16.040]  The state of California has no jurisdiction over that.
[15:16.040 --> 15:21.080]  He's not going to have diversity, he can't get that to the Fed.
[15:21.080 --> 15:22.200]  That's state criminal.
[15:22.200 --> 15:26.520]  The Fed doesn't have anything to say about state criminal.
[15:26.520 --> 15:29.280]  So push it in Texas.
[15:29.280 --> 15:37.640]  Okay, well, I will contact you off the show to figure out exactly how to do this because
[15:37.640 --> 15:45.400]  I want to go after this man big time and we can teach him a lesson or two that you don't
[15:45.400 --> 15:47.000]  miss with British Bulldogs.
[15:47.000 --> 15:48.000]  Yes.
[15:48.000 --> 15:57.080]  And if you get an indictment on minutia, your lawsuit is essentially dead bang.
[15:57.080 --> 15:58.080]  Yes.
[15:58.080 --> 16:02.320]  And then you get to sue minutiae big time.
[16:02.320 --> 16:10.120]  But that will be very nice and then can, you know, help others on the show and we can
[16:10.120 --> 16:15.280]  show them you just never give up even though at times I've wanted to give up.
[16:15.280 --> 16:17.880]  But this went personal for me.
[16:17.880 --> 16:22.080]  This took my whole life's work in America.
[16:22.080 --> 16:25.920]  30 years of work, 30 years of hope and dreams.
[16:25.920 --> 16:27.080]  They took it on me.
[16:27.080 --> 16:32.080]  They stole the American dreams and it took me off.
[16:32.080 --> 16:33.080]  Good.
[16:33.080 --> 16:35.080]  Maybe we can get it back.
[16:35.080 --> 16:36.080]  Okay.
[16:36.080 --> 16:41.440]  So let's go to someone else after the break so we can have a chance and thank you.
[16:41.440 --> 16:42.440]  Okay.
[16:42.440 --> 16:43.440]  Wake up, John.
[16:43.440 --> 16:44.440]  We're going to you when we come back.
[16:44.440 --> 16:52.120]  Ray DeCaltem, the rule of our radio, our call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:52.120 --> 16:53.120]  Give us a call.
[16:53.120 --> 17:00.280]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.280 --> 17:05.560]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[17:05.560 --> 17:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method.
[17:09.000 --> 17:13.400]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[17:13.400 --> 17:14.400]  can win two.
[17:14.400 --> 17:19.200]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.200 --> 17:20.200]  civil rights statutes.
[17:20.200 --> 17:25.600]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and
[17:25.600 --> 17:30.040]  phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial
[17:30.040 --> 17:33.800]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.800 --> 17:38.920]  The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.920 --> 17:41.040]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:41.040 --> 17:46.600]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[17:46.600 --> 17:49.600]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[17:49.600 --> 17:57.280]  This is ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[17:57.280 --> 18:01.800]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[18:01.800 --> 18:04.800]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Similar.
[18:04.800 --> 18:08.280]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[18:08.280 --> 18:12.320]  going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.320 --> 18:15.480]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to
[18:15.480 --> 18:19.680]  act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law.
[18:19.680 --> 18:23.560]  Traffic Courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.560 --> 18:25.360]  our rights through due process.
[18:25.360 --> 18:28.920]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the
[18:28.920 --> 18:32.680]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.680 --> 18:35.080]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:35.080 --> 18:39.080]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:39.080 --> 18:40.400]  ordering your copy today.
[18:40.400 --> 18:43.680]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.680 --> 18:47.360]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[18:47.360 --> 18:50.160]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.160 --> 18:54.160]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.160 --> 19:24.120]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:24.120 --> 19:41.640]  Okay we are back, Randy Kelkin on Rule of Law Radio on this 23rd day of October 2020
[19:41.640 --> 19:44.480]  and we're going to John in New York.
[19:44.480 --> 19:55.240]  Hello John, what do you have for us today?
[19:55.240 --> 20:02.680]  You know John, I've only got one eardrum and I think you just blew it out.
[20:02.680 --> 20:13.680]  Oops sorry about that, okay tell me if this is right or wrong, where we go, if I get this
[20:13.680 --> 20:17.000]  right.
[20:17.000 --> 20:22.480]  The government and the Census Bureau, I guess they're one and the same, they have no authority
[20:22.480 --> 20:29.040]  to ask more than one question on the census, the number of people in the house.
[20:29.040 --> 20:35.840]  And the government has no power to find someone, to find them for not answering that one question
[20:35.840 --> 20:38.000]  or any question.
[20:38.000 --> 20:44.680]  The Constitution says that the Congress can make an enumeration by law.
[20:44.680 --> 20:50.960]  It says nothing about finding you in the Constitution and since Title 13 is a statute
[20:50.960 --> 20:58.240]  and says there's a sign if you don't answer the question, since Title 13 is not a law
[20:58.240 --> 21:05.560]  that the Constitution refers to and Title 13 contradicts the Constitution, they can't
[21:05.560 --> 21:10.560]  find you for not answering the census, did I get that right?
[21:10.560 --> 21:14.600]  No, I didn't get it right.
[21:14.600 --> 21:18.800]  Title 13, if it's not a law, what is it?
[21:18.800 --> 21:20.600]  A statute.
[21:20.600 --> 21:21.600]  That's a law.
[21:21.600 --> 21:27.320]  Yeah but the Constitution doesn't say anything about finding.
[21:27.320 --> 21:34.720]  Yeah but the Constitution does grant the Legislature authority to pass law, finding
[21:34.720 --> 21:35.720]  on the people.
[21:35.720 --> 21:44.520]  Yeah but the law, when over a law, the Legislature can pass everything you want, like the Brady
[21:44.520 --> 21:51.280]  Bill and if it's unconstitutional, if it goes against what the Constitution says, and
[21:51.280 --> 21:55.280]  there's no authority in the Constitution to find someone.
[21:55.280 --> 21:59.360]  Now this is from Judge Andrew Pax?
[21:59.360 --> 22:07.720]  It's true that if something's unconstitutional, it's void ab initio, however, it will be treated
[22:07.720 --> 22:13.960]  as if it is valid until it is shown to be void.
[22:13.960 --> 22:23.400]  If a court has never ruled that a statute is void, then the police, the executive may
[22:23.400 --> 22:27.440]  act on that statute as if it were valid.
[22:27.440 --> 22:36.920]  All right, now the reason why I'm asking this is because Judge Andrew Napolitano quoted
[22:36.920 --> 22:42.440]  just what I just told you and he made it very emphatic.
[22:42.440 --> 22:50.120]  He said they think they have the right or the authority to find you and they don't.
[22:50.120 --> 22:56.240]  And they have no authority to ask more than one question, how many people in a house?
[22:56.240 --> 23:02.800]  Not their names, not if they're Asian or African or Zimbabwe or whatever.
[23:02.800 --> 23:10.960]  And that's all they can ask is the Constitution says, enumeration by law.
[23:10.960 --> 23:15.760]  And according to what Judge Napolitano says, now how do you address that?
[23:15.760 --> 23:21.720]  Is that a gray area or is he completely wrong or what's the smoke with that?
[23:21.720 --> 23:30.680]  Okay, you're speaking to an area of law I'm not intimately familiar with.
[23:30.680 --> 23:40.000]  Okay, the Constitution authorizes a census, is that correct?
[23:40.000 --> 23:43.440]  Yes, yep.
[23:43.440 --> 23:48.760]  And the only reference they make is an enumeration.
[23:48.760 --> 23:59.440]  Does the Constitution specify anything further concerning an enumeration?
[23:59.440 --> 24:05.760]  Not that I've ever read, not that I've ever read, it just says you can count the number
[24:05.760 --> 24:06.760]  of heads.
[24:06.760 --> 24:15.240]  Well, does that what it says, they may count the number of heads or does it say an enumeration?
[24:15.240 --> 24:22.120]  It just says Congress may make an enumeration pursuant to law.
[24:22.120 --> 24:23.920]  Okay.
[24:23.920 --> 24:33.760]  What does enumeration mean in the federal law relating to census?
[24:33.760 --> 24:38.600]  Well, I've never looked up enumeration in black law, but...
[24:38.600 --> 24:42.520]  Okay, you've got to get... Okay, that is the key word.
[24:42.520 --> 24:44.640]  What does enumeration mean?
[24:44.640 --> 24:51.880]  Does it mean you may count the number of living human beings domiciled in this location or
[24:51.880 --> 25:02.280]  does it mean you may count other things as well, gender, age?
[25:02.280 --> 25:03.720]  What does it mean?
[25:03.720 --> 25:06.880]  What has the courts said that it means?
[25:06.880 --> 25:09.920]  And that's your specific issue.
[25:09.920 --> 25:18.320]  We're asserting that enumeration only means counting the number of living souls domiciled
[25:18.320 --> 25:20.880]  in a location.
[25:20.880 --> 25:27.840]  And I seriously doubt that's what the courts have held it to mean.
[25:27.840 --> 25:34.520]  If the legislature had intended that you can only count the number of people living in
[25:34.520 --> 25:39.400]  a particular domicile, they would have said so.
[25:39.400 --> 25:46.920]  And they said you will make an enumeration, they chose that word very carefully.
[25:46.920 --> 25:53.320]  So why did they choose that word instead of the obvious, which would be count the number
[25:53.320 --> 25:55.320]  of people?
[25:55.320 --> 26:00.520]  Should I look up enumeration in black law dictionary?
[26:00.520 --> 26:07.280]  Would that be enough or... Then look it up and then read the case law that
[26:07.280 --> 26:14.160]  black refers to because blacks, first off, it's not sightable.
[26:14.160 --> 26:20.880]  The underlying case law is, but if you're looking for a definition of a single word,
[26:20.880 --> 26:29.840]  it's very likely that blacks is going to give you a legal variations on Webster's definition
[26:29.840 --> 26:35.600]  for the term enumeration, and enumeration is essentially going to be assigning numbers
[26:35.600 --> 26:38.080]  to something.
[26:38.080 --> 26:39.520]  And that's not going to be helpful.
[26:39.520 --> 26:45.600]  You need a definition of enumeration relative to census taking.
[26:45.600 --> 26:54.680]  Okay, so that they, you're saying that they can find an individual?
[26:54.680 --> 26:58.480]  No, I'm not saying you're such a saying.
[26:58.480 --> 27:01.200]  We're talking about the definition of enumeration.
[27:01.200 --> 27:08.200]  Oh, am I right in that the Constitution doesn't specify that the government has the right
[27:08.200 --> 27:12.640]  to find you if you don't comply with counting?
[27:12.640 --> 27:17.680]  Keep in mind that the Constitution is for the most part a restrictive document.
[27:17.680 --> 27:19.880]  Right, for the government.
[27:19.880 --> 27:20.880]  Yeah.
[27:20.880 --> 27:32.120]  If the founders intended that the governmental entities, the census takers, be restricted
[27:32.120 --> 27:38.600]  from finding you for not participating, they would have said so.
[27:38.600 --> 27:39.600]  But they didn't.
[27:39.600 --> 27:47.040]  But is it the opposite, true, that the Constitution is a limit to what the government can do, isn't
[27:47.040 --> 27:48.040]  it, Bill?
[27:48.040 --> 27:49.920]  That's exactly what I was saying.
[27:49.920 --> 28:05.680]  But if the founders intended that the census takers be restricted from setting fines for
[28:05.680 --> 28:10.120]  failure to participate, they would have said so.
[28:10.120 --> 28:14.720]  But they did not restrict them, and since they're not restricted, I would say they can
[28:14.720 --> 28:15.720]  do that.
[28:15.720 --> 28:20.080]  Yeah, but I thought the Constitution was...
[28:20.080 --> 28:21.080]  What's the government...
[28:21.080 --> 28:23.880]  If it's not the Constitution, the government can't do it.
[28:23.880 --> 28:24.880]  No.
[28:24.880 --> 28:26.880]  That's what I understood it to be.
[28:26.880 --> 28:27.880]  No?
[28:27.880 --> 28:28.880]  No, no, no.
[28:28.880 --> 28:29.880]  The government...
[28:29.880 --> 28:32.800]  The Constitution doesn't grant authority, it restricts authority.
[28:32.800 --> 28:33.800]  Right.
[28:33.800 --> 28:35.400]  And if it's not in there?
[28:35.400 --> 28:36.400]  No.
[28:36.400 --> 28:37.400]  What the government...
[28:37.400 --> 28:42.600]  What the Constitution says, these are the things you can't do.
[28:42.600 --> 28:49.800]  If it's not enumerated in here that you can't do this, then that implies that you can do
[28:49.800 --> 28:58.360]  it, so long as the doing doesn't infringe on some other law or some specific right.
[28:58.360 --> 29:03.400]  All right, what I'll do is I'll send you the very short video.
[29:03.400 --> 29:08.560]  I think it's about five minutes, or maybe less, Judge Andrew Napolitan, I'll send that
[29:08.560 --> 29:13.920]  video and listen to how he works it and what he's done, and you tell me if he's right.
[29:13.920 --> 29:15.520]  Now, that guy's a good...
[29:15.520 --> 29:18.240]  If he's some kind of a nut, maybe, or...
[29:18.240 --> 29:19.240]  No, no, no.
[29:19.240 --> 29:26.360]  I think maybe you misunderstood either what he's saying or the perspective from which
[29:26.360 --> 29:29.640]  he's saying it, because this guy's no job.
[29:29.640 --> 29:32.120]  No, he's very good.
[29:32.120 --> 29:35.560]  Napolitano has a good reputation, as you know.
[29:35.560 --> 29:36.560]  Yes.
[29:36.560 --> 29:43.560]  Hang on, pick this up on the other side, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, our call in number
[29:43.560 --> 29:51.240]  512-646-1984, you have room on the call board, if you have a question or comment, give us
[29:51.240 --> 30:01.280]  a call, we'll be right back.
[30:01.280 --> 30:05.720]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk
[30:05.720 --> 30:07.920]  could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:07.920 --> 30:13.080]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you more about walking prognostication
[30:13.080 --> 30:14.760]  in just a moment.
[30:14.760 --> 30:16.360]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.360 --> 30:20.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[30:20.760 --> 30:24.720]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:24.720 --> 30:29.800]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:29.800 --> 30:32.480]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:32.480 --> 30:36.800]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:36.800 --> 30:40.320]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.320 --> 30:42.480]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:42.480 --> 30:48.000]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:48.000 --> 30:52.600]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter
[30:52.600 --> 30:55.800]  per second or faster live longer than expected.
[30:55.800 --> 31:00.240]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[31:00.240 --> 31:04.960]  A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy
[31:04.960 --> 31:07.320]  as more traditional statistical measures.
[31:07.320 --> 31:10.600]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[31:10.600 --> 31:13.120]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive.
[31:13.120 --> 31:16.920]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes.
[31:16.920 --> 31:21.640]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care.
[31:21.640 --> 31:23.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:23.040 --> 31:30.440]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.440 --> 31:31.440]  I lost my son.
[31:31.440 --> 31:32.440]  My nephew.
[31:32.440 --> 31:33.440]  My uncle.
[31:33.440 --> 31:34.440]  My son.
[31:34.440 --> 31:35.440]  On September 11th, 2000.
[31:35.440 --> 31:38.720]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[31:38.720 --> 31:42.920]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:42.920 --> 31:48.720]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7, over 1,200 architects
[31:48.720 --> 31:52.480]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[31:52.480 --> 31:53.920]  Bring justice to my son.
[31:53.920 --> 31:54.920]  My uncle.
[31:54.920 --> 31:55.920]  My nephew.
[31:55.920 --> 31:56.920]  My son.
[31:56.920 --> 31:57.920]  Go to building what.org.
[31:57.920 --> 31:58.920]  Why it fell?
[31:58.920 --> 31:59.920]  Why it matters?
[31:59.920 --> 32:00.920]  And what you can do.
[32:00.920 --> 32:05.720]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[32:05.720 --> 32:12.000]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th, from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time.
[32:12.000 --> 32:15.080]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516.
[32:15.080 --> 32:20.120]  Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your father
[32:20.120 --> 32:21.680]  which is in heaven.
[32:21.680 --> 32:26.800]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:26.800 --> 32:32.040]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed
[32:32.040 --> 32:35.160]  to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:35.160 --> 32:39.560]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss
[32:39.560 --> 32:41.320]  one chapter per week.
[32:41.320 --> 32:46.400]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as
[32:46.400 --> 32:47.920]  Christian character development.
[32:47.920 --> 32:56.200]  So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January
[32:56.200 --> 33:02.200]  8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[33:02.200 --> 33:23.720]  Join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:32.200 --> 33:34.320]  Okay, we are back.
[33:34.320 --> 33:42.360]  Randy Kelton, Rula Law Radio on this Friday, the 23rd day of October 2020, and we're talking
[33:42.360 --> 33:46.480]  to John in New York.
[33:46.480 --> 33:50.480]  Okay, do you have any other questions?
[33:50.480 --> 33:55.240]  This was a question about you have a problem with the census.
[33:55.240 --> 33:59.520]  What is your problem with the census?
[33:59.520 --> 34:05.880]  I saw two judges, Judge Andrew Napolitano, who said what I just said, and then there
[34:05.880 --> 34:13.200]  was a lady judge who kind of stuck a monkey wrench in the Census Bureau's gears that
[34:13.200 --> 34:19.280]  they were asking too many questions and that some of the questions were not constitutional
[34:19.280 --> 34:23.560]  and that kind of gummed up their works for a while.
[34:23.560 --> 34:30.240]  But I don't remember, I didn't conclude that with any court rulings.
[34:30.240 --> 34:37.760]  I guess she stopped it for a while or brought question to it and I don't know what the official
[34:37.760 --> 34:44.080]  outcome of that was, but I'll send you the link to Judge Andrew Napolitano and then tell
[34:44.080 --> 34:51.160]  me if what he's saying is accurate or not and like maybe I missed something in the process.
[34:51.160 --> 35:00.960]  I would not be so presumptuous to consider that I could trump Napolitano certainly out
[35:00.960 --> 35:01.960]  of my league.
[35:01.960 --> 35:14.040]  I'm just a local chump hillbilly, but I may be able to better explain where Napolitano
[35:14.040 --> 35:16.040]  is going.
[35:16.040 --> 35:29.040]  Right, okay, if you get that material on the executive orders, is that helpful at all?
[35:29.040 --> 35:38.040]  Well, what I got from you were general statements about executive orders.
[35:38.040 --> 35:41.760]  I sent you back an email asking for specifics.
[35:41.760 --> 35:43.760]  I'd like to see the orders themselves.
[35:43.760 --> 35:47.000]  Well, I did, I sent those, didn't you get them?
[35:47.000 --> 35:53.280]  I don't recall getting those, but have you went through them?
[35:53.280 --> 35:58.480]  I went through a few of them and some of the ones were the ones I was familiar with.
[35:58.480 --> 36:06.520]  Like what he did was he used the 14-year-old photograph with evidence that the modern Jews
[36:06.520 --> 36:15.480]  were not following the match rule and the numbers of rule in their synagogue and...
[36:15.480 --> 36:20.200]  Okay, wait, a 14-year-old photograph, what did that mean?
[36:20.200 --> 36:26.800]  Well, there was a 14-year-old photograph, and 14 years ago nobody wore a match.
[36:26.800 --> 36:31.520]  No, you just, you dropped that in like a bomb in the middle of something.
[36:31.520 --> 36:39.840]  Are you saying that he produced a photograph of Jews in a synagogue not wearing masks and
[36:39.840 --> 36:45.720]  used that photograph as evidence to support his assertion that they weren't wearing masks,
[36:45.720 --> 36:51.000]  but the photograph itself was 14 years old?
[36:51.000 --> 36:57.600]  No, he was trying to stay, it was a couple of weeks ago.
[36:57.600 --> 37:02.320]  And this is going on about a couple of weeks now, so it might be a month now.
[37:02.320 --> 37:08.880]  And in other words, he was trying to use a photograph that there was no law about wearing
[37:08.880 --> 37:10.520]  masks when that picture was taken.
[37:10.520 --> 37:15.720]  Okay, well, what was the point of going after Jews in a synagogue?
[37:15.720 --> 37:22.400]  Going after Jews in any perspective seems to be really, really dangerous ground for
[37:22.400 --> 37:23.920]  a politician.
[37:23.920 --> 37:31.920]  Especially in New York, so why, what was that about?
[37:31.920 --> 37:36.000]  Well, I'm going to tell you what I think it's about.
[37:36.000 --> 37:42.600]  I've been doing, I've been doing research on communism since I was seven years old.
[37:42.600 --> 37:51.200]  I just happened to live in a household where my parents were very, very aware of communism.
[37:51.200 --> 38:00.080]  Now, just remember, the president, he did things in favor of Israel.
[38:00.080 --> 38:06.800]  He passed, I don't know what you'd call it, he signed something declaring that the capital
[38:06.800 --> 38:12.800]  was such and such and it was very beneficial for the Jewish population and the Jewish people
[38:12.800 --> 38:15.200]  really liked that.
[38:15.200 --> 38:16.680]  He moved the embassy.
[38:16.680 --> 38:19.600]  I'm sorry?
[38:19.600 --> 38:22.200]  He moved the U.S. embassy, I believe.
[38:22.200 --> 38:24.800]  Yeah, I think that was it.
[38:24.800 --> 38:30.440]  So whatever it was that he did was very, very much in favor of the Jewish population and
[38:30.440 --> 38:31.440]  they appreciated that.
[38:31.440 --> 38:37.160]  Now, if Trump does something, he's a Republican, if he does something, don't you know that
[38:37.160 --> 38:40.040]  the Democrats are going to come?
[38:40.040 --> 38:44.720]  The Democrats are against the United States having anything to do with Israel.
[38:44.720 --> 38:52.000]  They're against anything beneficial to the United States to do for Israel and they're
[38:52.000 --> 38:56.160]  just naturally against anything that Trump does anyway.
[38:56.160 --> 38:57.160]  That's...
[38:57.160 --> 38:59.440]  It gets up, huh?
[38:59.440 --> 39:04.680]  I'm uncomfortable with those kinds of statements.
[39:04.680 --> 39:12.080]  It seems hyperbole in that it's kind of an overstatement.
[39:12.080 --> 39:20.760]  I have never heard the Democrats attack the Jewish population directly at all.
[39:20.760 --> 39:29.480]  I think that Trump says they're going to disagree with and that's a Republican.
[39:29.480 --> 39:37.000]  I'm sure that that is more of a Republican tendency to side with Israel than it is a
[39:37.000 --> 39:38.000]  Democrat.
[39:38.000 --> 39:45.960]  Well, presidents have always sided with Israel because the Israeli lobby in this country
[39:45.960 --> 39:50.920]  is extremely powerful.
[39:50.920 --> 39:53.800]  We're pals with Israel.
[39:53.800 --> 39:56.920]  We are their allies, basically.
[39:56.920 --> 39:57.920]  Exactly.
[39:57.920 --> 40:05.040]  Basically, specifically their allies and we made it very clear that we're aligned with
[40:05.040 --> 40:08.640]  Israel against all comers.
[40:08.640 --> 40:16.120]  The Jewish population in the United States is large and it is economically powerful.
[40:16.120 --> 40:23.560]  No president is right, political mind will cross the Jews, the Jewish community.
[40:23.560 --> 40:25.800]  I don't like using the term Jews.
[40:25.800 --> 40:30.120]  My father-in-law was an Armenian Jew.
[40:30.120 --> 40:39.560]  Jews always feel pejorative to me, but anyway, they are a large lobby and it's political
[40:39.560 --> 40:43.520]  suicide to go directly against them.
[40:43.520 --> 40:50.800]  Democrat-Republican doesn't make any difference.
[40:50.800 --> 40:54.560]  The governor in New York has attacked the Jews directly?
[40:54.560 --> 40:55.560]  Oh, yeah.
[40:55.560 --> 40:56.560]  Geez.
[40:56.560 --> 41:02.400]  I did that, I did that, I did that, I did that, I did that, I did that.
[41:02.400 --> 41:03.400]  I did that.
[41:03.400 --> 41:09.800]  I'll go back and get it and I'll show you how he came right out and boy, he was that
[41:09.800 --> 41:10.800]  one.
[41:10.800 --> 41:21.960]  I really wanted to find out more about the orders that he's given.
[41:21.960 --> 41:27.040]  This whole presentation in the beginning of this show was all about the orders given
[41:27.040 --> 41:33.200]  by the governor and how they violated the limits of his authority.
[41:33.200 --> 41:42.400]  As I understand, the Cuomo went to the legislature to get approval for some of the things that
[41:42.400 --> 41:44.840]  he did in his executive orders.
[41:44.840 --> 41:51.840]  Did he do that in all of them or does he have orders that were not approved by the legislature?
[41:51.840 --> 42:00.400]  Well, all I can answer is that the legislature passed legislation giving him a lot more power.
[42:00.400 --> 42:06.000]  Now, what that was exactly, I don't know, I didn't look that up, all I know is that
[42:06.000 --> 42:10.240]  a lot of what he did was with the legislature's blessing.
[42:10.240 --> 42:17.280]  And then a Republican senator from the state, a state senator, I guess she introduced a
[42:17.280 --> 42:25.200]  bill to limit the governor's power in that, like what he did with COVID-19 to limit his
[42:25.200 --> 42:31.560]  powers because of what he did with putting sick people in with the nursing home patients,
[42:31.560 --> 42:33.560]  killing, I don't know, how many thousands?
[42:33.560 --> 42:36.200]  Today, I heard it was like 12,000.
[42:36.200 --> 42:40.320]  Now whether or not they all died because of him, I don't know, but a lot of people died
[42:40.320 --> 42:43.680]  because of him and they wanted to limit that power.
[42:43.680 --> 42:49.240]  So first they give him the power and now she introduces a bill, or was one of the introducers
[42:49.240 --> 42:56.840]  of the bill, to limit his power regarding COVID-19, then I do know.
[42:56.840 --> 43:03.120]  Now follow my reasoning now that I know this isn't written in stone, but when you see a
[43:03.120 --> 43:08.040]  doc that walks like a doc, talks like a doc, he's got a bill, he's got centers on his tail,
[43:08.040 --> 43:14.520]  and he's got slapping type of feet, web feet, you know he's a doc.
[43:14.520 --> 43:18.760]  Here goes my analogy, and you can comment on this.
[43:18.760 --> 43:29.800]  Like I said, Trump passed that official recognition, 30 seconds, he passed that official recognition
[43:29.800 --> 43:38.400]  about the, whatever building that is, you set the embassy, and...
[43:38.400 --> 43:43.360]  Okay, hold on, hold on, you're not going to make it, Randy Kelton, rule of law radio,
[43:43.360 --> 43:52.160]  I call in number 512-646-1984, give us a call, we've got another hour and 15 minutes,
[43:52.160 --> 43:57.960]  so we can probably take one, maybe two more call in, they've got two on the board, I
[43:57.960 --> 44:00.720] 'll handle one more, we'll be right back.
[44:00.720 --> 44:05.320]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[44:05.320 --> 44:06.720]  of nutrition.
[44:06.720 --> 44:11.480]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.480 --> 44:17.160]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.160 --> 44:22.560]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[44:22.560 --> 44:28.040]  Jeviti can provide the nutrients you need, Logos Radio Network gets many requests to
[44:28.040 --> 44:31.720]  endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[44:31.720 --> 44:38.360]  We have come to trust Jeviti so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones,
[44:38.360 --> 44:40.160]  Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:40.160 --> 44:46.120]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[44:46.120 --> 44:47.720]  quality radio.
[44:47.720 --> 44:53.200]  As you realize the benefits of Jeviti, you may want to join us, as a distributor, you
[44:53.200 --> 44:59.240]  can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[44:59.240 --> 45:00.240]  Order now.
[45:00.240 --> 45:04.360]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.360 --> 45:11.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand 4-CD course
[45:11.120 --> 45:14.840]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:14.840 --> 45:18.920]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.920 --> 45:22.840]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.840 --> 45:28.200]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.200 --> 45:34.760]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.760 --> 45:39.240]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:39.240 --> 45:43.600]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.600 --> 45:49.720]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.720 --> 45:52.400]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.400 --> 45:56.480]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[45:56.480 --> 46:22.480]  Are called toll-free, 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:22.480 --> 46:33.640]  Okay, we are back.
[46:33.640 --> 46:46.480]  Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to John in New York, and I guess another
[46:46.480 --> 46:52.440]  question I'd like to ask, unless not I couldn't watch the debates because I was doing a show.
[46:52.440 --> 46:56.320]  Did you watch the debates, John?
[46:56.320 --> 47:03.280]  Not live, I watched them afterwards all recorded, and Biden was lying his head off, and I did
[47:03.280 --> 47:09.560]  news for over 40 years, and I know lies when I hear them, and I know what the truth was,
[47:09.560 --> 47:12.760]  and it was lie after lie.
[47:12.760 --> 47:17.640]  How did the two handle themselves in this debate?
[47:17.640 --> 47:19.400]  More like adults.
[47:19.400 --> 47:20.400]  Oh, wonderful.
[47:20.400 --> 47:27.000]  I was concerned we'd have another free-for-all like the last one, so I'm glad they...
[47:27.000 --> 47:32.400]  I suspect everybody chewed them out about that.
[47:32.400 --> 47:36.680]  But yeah, but the moderator was clearly for Biden.
[47:36.680 --> 47:37.960]  You could see the bias.
[47:37.960 --> 47:40.000]  Oh, it was the same way with the first one.
[47:40.000 --> 47:48.080]  I was amazed at how he constructed questions that were so lopsided if I was Trump, I would
[47:48.080 --> 47:50.240]  have never touched those questions.
[47:50.240 --> 47:57.280]  I would have landed right square in the middle of the moderator, and had him cut that nonsense
[47:57.280 --> 47:58.280]  out.
[47:58.280 --> 48:00.280]  You asked me a straight question.
[48:00.280 --> 48:03.600]  So yeah, I've seen that.
[48:03.600 --> 48:06.080]  Another thing was public radio.
[48:06.080 --> 48:10.240]  You heard that public radio has announced that they will not cover the Hunter Biden-ish
[48:10.240 --> 48:14.040]  story because they did not consider it news.
[48:14.040 --> 48:17.440]  Oh, public radio is so far left.
[48:17.440 --> 48:18.440]  It's diamond.
[48:18.440 --> 48:19.440]  That's funny.
[48:19.440 --> 48:29.680]  I am planning constructing a civil lawsuit to file against public radio, asking that
[48:29.680 --> 48:35.560]  public radio return all of the public funds that it received under contract.
[48:35.560 --> 48:39.400]  I have to get the contract first and read it.
[48:39.400 --> 48:46.800]  But this appears to breach their contract with the public.
[48:46.800 --> 48:51.040]  They don't have the authority not to cover a story.
[48:51.040 --> 48:59.240]  I was getting frustrated with public radio because all of the news and programs I'd been
[48:59.240 --> 49:07.040]  hearing were so clearly biased that I was, you know, I'm not a Republican and I'm not
[49:07.040 --> 49:08.560]  a Democrat.
[49:08.560 --> 49:11.200]  I want to hear good arguments from both sides.
[49:11.200 --> 49:19.040]  I am concerned that the Republicans this time, this cycle will get control of the House
[49:19.040 --> 49:22.080]  and the Senate.
[49:22.080 --> 49:24.680]  That's a scary proposition.
[49:24.680 --> 49:31.160]  It's a scary proposition for either side to have control of both the House and the Senate.
[49:31.160 --> 49:39.080]  So I want good information, but I can't get good information.
[49:39.080 --> 49:41.960]  Getting the truth, that's why.
[49:41.960 --> 49:42.960]  Yeah.
[49:42.960 --> 49:45.320]  Well, I know I'm not going to get the truth.
[49:45.320 --> 49:47.680]  I mean, that goes without saying.
[49:47.680 --> 49:56.720]  But at least I could get some emphasis on issues that are relevant and salient to me.
[49:56.720 --> 49:58.920]  I'm not getting any of that.
[49:58.920 --> 50:04.040]  Nothing but hateful trash back and forth.
[50:04.040 --> 50:08.080]  Trump tries to talk about some of the things that he's did to improve the economy.
[50:08.080 --> 50:11.960]  And that's because he's a president and he's done stuff and he's got stuff to talk about.
[50:11.960 --> 50:22.360]  But the Democrats, and I'm trying not to sound lopsided, but he is lopsided.
[50:22.360 --> 50:27.560]  I can't imagine, you know, there's Republicans and there's Democrats and then there's this
[50:27.560 --> 50:29.640]  big group in the middle.
[50:29.640 --> 50:37.200]  Well, I'm in the middle and I'm trying to get something from the Democrats positive.
[50:37.200 --> 50:41.600]  And all I'm getting is trash on top of trash on top of trash.
[50:41.600 --> 50:43.800]  Am I missing something here?
[50:43.800 --> 50:44.800]  Yeah.
[50:44.800 --> 50:45.800]  And explain.
[50:45.800 --> 50:50.320]  Tony, who's the word lopsided?
[50:50.320 --> 50:54.080]  I was just about to say lopsided when you did.
[50:54.080 --> 50:58.040]  The moderator, it was lopsided in favor of Biden.
[50:58.040 --> 51:00.000]  Let me explain something.
[51:00.000 --> 51:07.240]  There was a radio, television station, it's PBS in one of our local communities in upstate
[51:07.240 --> 51:08.240]  New York.
[51:08.240 --> 51:09.240]  I won't mention it.
[51:09.240 --> 51:10.240]  To be kind.
[51:10.240 --> 51:11.240]  Don't be kind.
[51:11.240 --> 51:16.240]  They didn't earn kind.
[51:16.240 --> 51:18.240]  They haven't earned kind.
[51:18.240 --> 51:20.640]  I haven't won.
[51:20.640 --> 51:21.640]  I'm sorry.
[51:21.640 --> 51:24.040]  They haven't earned kind.
[51:24.040 --> 51:27.040]  Oh, well, no, I know, I know.
[51:27.040 --> 51:33.880]  But I'll be professional, here's an explanation, Reagan back in the 80s cut funding to public
[51:33.880 --> 51:35.800]  television big time.
[51:35.800 --> 51:37.440]  And of course, they were complaining.
[51:37.440 --> 51:43.880]  But one day I had to go up to one of the public radio or public television stations.
[51:43.880 --> 51:48.880]  They were selling a board and we needed a board at our station.
[51:48.880 --> 51:51.360]  So I went up to look at it.
[51:51.360 --> 51:59.880]  And in the process, I can understand how President Reagan cut funding big time to public television.
[51:59.880 --> 52:06.000]  Because I saw people sitting around their boards, their control boards, three people
[52:06.000 --> 52:11.560]  just sitting there staring at the ceiling, three people literally three doing the job
[52:11.560 --> 52:13.640]  one person could do.
[52:13.640 --> 52:16.720]  So I understand why he cut the funding.
[52:16.720 --> 52:21.040]  And I said, goody, goody, gum drops, that's number one.
[52:21.040 --> 52:27.160]  Number two, public radio and television is hatefully communist.
[52:27.160 --> 52:28.880]  And here's my third explanation.
[52:28.880 --> 52:30.400]  Maybe this will make things clearer.
[52:30.400 --> 52:31.800]  It's a real short one.
[52:31.800 --> 52:33.600]  You'll appreciate that.
[52:33.600 --> 52:38.760]  Trump likes to help the Jewish people because he helps everybody.
[52:38.760 --> 52:45.320]  And the Democrats hate Trump, so the Democrats quite naturally are probably going to single
[52:45.320 --> 52:48.880]  out the Jewish population and hate them.
[52:48.880 --> 52:51.120]  That's why Cuomo did what he did.
[52:51.120 --> 52:54.920]  Iran also hates Trump.
[52:54.920 --> 52:59.480]  And naturally, they don't particularly care for the Jewish population either.
[52:59.480 --> 53:01.400]  So there you have it on both sides.
[53:01.400 --> 53:05.120]  You've got people on one side and people on the other.
[53:05.120 --> 53:08.120]  You've got the left and then you've got the right.
[53:08.120 --> 53:12.480]  You've got freedom on the right and you've got tyranny on the left.
[53:12.480 --> 53:13.480]  And that's it.
[53:13.480 --> 53:14.480]  Hold on.
[53:14.480 --> 53:23.080]  I am a little uncomfortable with this kind of lopsided analysis.
[53:23.080 --> 53:27.600]  These are overgeneralizations and I'm uncomfortable with them.
[53:27.600 --> 53:31.520]  I know lots of people who are Democrats and they don't hate Jews.
[53:31.520 --> 53:37.680]  Well, I, yeah, I know, I know.
[53:37.680 --> 53:43.080]  This goes to strongman issues where you pick a minor point, exaggerate the point and then
[53:43.080 --> 53:48.360]  attack the exaggeration, send the form of overgeneralizations, and I'm uncomfortable
[53:48.360 --> 53:49.360]  with that.
[53:49.360 --> 53:57.160]  I want, I want good information, the, instead of just casting dispersions, what's really
[53:57.160 --> 54:01.720]  going on with the, with the Democrats?
[54:01.720 --> 54:09.320]  What is the motivation for this singular focus on Trump and no focus on issues?
[54:09.320 --> 54:19.000]  Well, you have to understand there's the left and there's the right.
[54:19.000 --> 54:25.240]  Most people think that they're in the middle and that's kind of a, you know, they think
[54:25.240 --> 54:26.240]  they're in the middle.
[54:26.240 --> 54:30.080]  Some of them that are really in the middle are, there are some people that really aren't
[54:30.080 --> 54:34.080]  in the middle and if they're not communists, they're far right.
[54:34.080 --> 54:40.720]  You have to understand that communists, what they're doing is, it's like BLM, they've
[54:40.720 --> 54:43.720]  got storefront, what's in the storefront window?
[54:43.720 --> 54:48.720]  Well, we're going to save black people from the cops.
[54:48.720 --> 54:54.240]  We're going to save them from black, from, from cop tyranny and brutality, but that's
[54:54.240 --> 54:55.920]  not what BLM is all about.
[54:55.920 --> 54:57.400]  You know it and I know it.
[54:57.400 --> 54:59.720]  The same with Antifa.
[54:59.720 --> 55:05.360]  They are about anarchy, riots, burning cities and that's what their main job is to cause
[55:05.360 --> 55:07.800]  confusion, chaos and rebellion.
[55:07.800 --> 55:10.560]  That's how communists take over a country.
[55:10.560 --> 55:16.040]  First there were riots and there's food shortages just like here, then there's no toilet paper
[55:16.040 --> 55:22.840]  like in Venezuela and you, that's how they do their job and there's this, this name game.
[55:22.840 --> 55:24.640]  They play the name game.
[55:24.640 --> 55:36.240]  First it's illegal immigrants, then it's undocumented workers, then it's undocumented professionals.
[55:36.240 --> 55:37.760]  They sugarcoat things.
[55:37.760 --> 55:42.080]  They change the words, the narratives.
[55:42.080 --> 55:43.080]  There's no men and women.
[55:43.080 --> 55:48.360]  You'll get thrown out of school if you admit that there is two sexes, male and female.
[55:48.360 --> 55:52.160]  Now they want you to admit that there are transgenders.
[55:52.160 --> 55:58.240]  There's lesbians and the homosexuals and, and, okay, hold on, hold on.
[55:58.240 --> 56:01.080]  This is so much propaganda.
[56:01.080 --> 56:04.360]  I'm having trouble with it.
[56:04.360 --> 56:11.920]  I have a, my son married a woman from Bulgaria and recently her parents, all the kids moved
[56:11.920 --> 56:16.320]  to the United States and her parents sold the property there and moved here.
[56:16.320 --> 56:17.960]  The father doesn't speak English at all.
[56:17.960 --> 56:20.800]  He speaks Bulgarian and Russian.
[56:20.800 --> 56:25.280]  And they have a friend, Igor, Igor is a Russian.
[56:25.280 --> 56:27.560]  He worked for the Russian government.
[56:27.560 --> 56:39.920]  He was a bureaucrat his whole life and he has a whole different perspective on communism.
[56:39.920 --> 56:45.760]  He struggles here to understand the system.
[56:45.760 --> 56:52.840]  And communism, everybody, you know, all his life, he had a relatively easy life.
[56:52.840 --> 56:55.400]  He didn't have to buy his own apartment.
[56:55.400 --> 56:57.920]  He didn't have to pay for medical.
[56:57.920 --> 57:02.400]  All his kids went to college, all paid for.
[57:02.400 --> 57:10.520]  He looks here, when he came to America, he was amazed at how much Americans are struggling.
[57:10.520 --> 57:16.360]  So when you're speaking to communism as it is, as if it is the absolute terror of the
[57:16.360 --> 57:22.360]  planet, Igor, he has a whole different perspective on communism.
[57:22.360 --> 57:28.760]  And yeah, we had some difficulties, you know, we had shortages of certain things, but then
[57:28.760 --> 57:34.200]  we think what he says is the only thing we saw here were the things that had shortages
[57:34.200 --> 57:40.920]  in it, and they were minor, that for the most part, they had pretty much what they wanted.
[57:40.920 --> 57:46.960]  That while we're getting his propaganda, all they got is propaganda.
[57:46.960 --> 57:52.960]  You know, so I'm uncomfortable with those gross over generalizations.
[57:52.960 --> 58:00.680]  I want to understand what's really going on before and after it became communist.
[58:00.680 --> 58:06.600]  Before it became communist, it was absolutely horrible.
[58:06.600 --> 58:12.320]  He became communist after they killed off the aristocracy, and the aristocracy was like
[58:12.320 --> 58:15.360]  in France before the French Revolution.
[58:15.360 --> 58:22.120]  They just starved the public to death, because it was much worse before communism than it
[58:22.120 --> 58:24.200]  was in communism.
[58:24.200 --> 58:28.200]  Communism had its problems, but there was nothing compared to what they experienced before
[58:28.200 --> 58:29.200]  that.
[58:29.200 --> 58:37.200]  Moving on, Randy Kelton with Law Radio, call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:37.200 --> 58:43.640]  We do have a couple more callers, so I do want to move on, John.
[58:43.640 --> 58:45.680]  We'll pick you up next week.
[58:45.680 --> 58:50.320]  Okay, we'll be right back.
[58:50.320 --> 58:54.440]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.440 --> 58:59.640]  Laws for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.640 --> 59:00.960]  can really help.
[59:00.960 --> 59:05.320]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.320 --> 59:06.320]  today.
[59:06.320 --> 59:10.320]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.320 --> 59:13.440]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.440 --> 59:18.680]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.680 --> 59:22.960]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan
[59:22.960 --> 59:27.920]  of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:27.920 --> 59:32.920]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:32.920 --> 59:45.720]  Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit
[59:45.720 --> 59:48.880]  us online at bfa.org.
[59:48.880 --> 01:00:00.720]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at www.logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.720 --> 01:00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.800 --> 01:00:13.120]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[01:00:13.120 --> 01:00:21.120]  silver at $16.45 an ounce, copper at $2.75 an ounce, oil at $55.63 a barrel, brand
[01:00:21.120 --> 01:00:29.360]  crude at $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, bitcoin core at $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.360 --> 01:00:44.040]  Ethereum at $227.26, XRP Ripple at $0.33, Litecoin at $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash at $324.10 a
[01:00:44.040 --> 01:00:46.040]  crypto coin.
[01:00:46.040 --> 01:00:52.440]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[01:00:52.440 --> 01:00:57.760]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[01:00:57.760 --> 01:01:04.760]  10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:01:04.760 --> 01:01:09.800]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hempett attacks
[01:01:09.800 --> 01:01:15.000]  his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, San Antonio
[01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:19.120]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they
[01:01:19.120 --> 01:01:23.200]  are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the
[01:01:23.200 --> 01:01:27.920]  herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this
[01:01:27.920 --> 01:01:32.880]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of
[01:01:32.880 --> 01:01:33.880]  the law.
[01:01:33.880 --> 01:01:37.560]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:01:37.560 --> 01:01:42.080]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:42.080 --> 01:01:48.240]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:01:48.240 --> 01:01:54.480]  well as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:01:54.480 --> 01:01:58.960]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:01:58.960 --> 01:02:01.760]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.760 --> 01:02:06.760]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[01:02:06.760 --> 01:02:10.760]  in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[01:02:10.760 --> 01:02:13.480]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.480 --> 01:02:17.360]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[01:02:17.360 --> 01:02:22.600]  charged with.
[01:02:22.600 --> 01:02:27.240]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[01:02:27.240 --> 01:02:32.360]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[01:02:32.360 --> 01:02:38.000]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:39.200]  Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.200 --> 01:02:43.800]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[01:02:43.800 --> 01:02:50.080]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[01:02:50.080 --> 01:03:18.480]  glow.
[01:03:20.080 --> 01:03:28.760]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Wheel of Law Radio on this Friday, the 23rd day of
[01:03:28.760 --> 01:03:34.440]  October, 2020, and we're going to Robert in California.
[01:03:34.440 --> 01:03:35.940]  Hello, Robert.
[01:03:35.940 --> 01:03:38.600]  What do you have for us today?
[01:03:38.600 --> 01:03:41.840]  Well, can you hear me all right?
[01:03:41.840 --> 01:03:43.320]  Yes, I can.
[01:03:43.320 --> 01:03:45.320]  Okay.
[01:03:45.320 --> 01:03:53.720]  I wanted to, after listening to Deborah last night, I had some ideas about a judge that
[01:03:53.720 --> 01:04:04.280]  told me in court that I could remove my mask, that we were far enough away to be safe.
[01:04:04.280 --> 01:04:15.120]  And I have made a judicial complaint against him about his statement because of what Deborah
[01:04:15.120 --> 01:04:19.800]  had to say about his medical credentials.
[01:04:19.800 --> 01:04:29.440]  And I wanted to learn that by you, and I'm proud of that.
[01:04:29.440 --> 01:04:42.280]  So you're accusing him of making a medical analysis or a medical diagnosis of the likelihood
[01:04:42.280 --> 01:04:45.880]  of contamination based on this distance.
[01:04:45.880 --> 01:04:49.880]  Right, he endangered me.
[01:04:49.880 --> 01:04:50.880]  I'm vulnerable.
[01:04:50.880 --> 01:05:01.840]  Well, you know, I could spit 20 feet once, I can't now, but, okay, so, yeah, I could,
[01:05:01.840 --> 01:05:08.200]  you could, well, you could.
[01:05:08.200 --> 01:05:11.280]  Well, I'm going to.
[01:05:11.280 --> 01:05:14.880]  Oh, wonderful.
[01:05:14.880 --> 01:05:24.320]  I have someone I'm going to try to bring on out of Pennsylvania, who you will appreciate.
[01:05:24.320 --> 01:05:33.960]  He followed Robert Fox's affidavit methodologies, I'm going to talk about those more, but he's
[01:05:33.960 --> 01:05:38.640]  beating up Pennsylvania the way you're beating up California.
[01:05:38.640 --> 01:05:46.000]  Well, I'm trying to do the best I can with what I got to work with.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:54.480]  I had a investigator from the district attorney's office that I submitted a criminal complaint
[01:05:54.480 --> 01:06:01.920]  on the district attorney and two assistant district attorneys telling me she's been beating
[01:06:01.920 --> 01:06:06.440]  around the bush answering or letting me know what's going on.
[01:06:06.440 --> 01:06:10.880]  Finally, she got back to me and she says, well, maybe you should take it to a higher
[01:06:10.880 --> 01:06:16.080]  authority like the attorney general or the state.
[01:06:16.080 --> 01:06:32.360]  And I sent her back a, where I found where you can send the complaint into any case officer.
[01:06:32.360 --> 01:06:40.040]  And so she said, well, these are attorneys, not a police officer.
[01:06:40.040 --> 01:06:44.960]  And I said, well, you're a police officer, aren't you?
[01:06:44.960 --> 01:06:49.240]  So I want to know where to send in a complaint in about you.
[01:06:49.240 --> 01:06:57.880]  She hasn't answered that email yet, but anyway, okay, well, just that's something I have in
[01:06:57.880 --> 01:07:05.600]  mind to do, I've sent in about 10 judicial complaints on this judge because he didn't
[01:07:05.600 --> 01:07:12.440]  rule on any of the interrogatories that I put into the court.
[01:07:12.440 --> 01:07:15.160]  He ruled on none of them.
[01:07:15.160 --> 01:07:21.680]  So I didn't send in a judicial complaint about each one that he did not rule on, is that
[01:07:21.680 --> 01:07:22.680]  right?
[01:07:22.680 --> 01:07:23.680]  Absolutely.
[01:07:23.680 --> 01:07:24.680]  Yeah.
[01:07:24.680 --> 01:07:33.560]  And you should, well, I've been sending in one a week, so because they know, but no,
[01:07:33.560 --> 01:07:38.440]  did you, did you try to file criminal charges on the judge?
[01:07:38.440 --> 01:07:47.680]  Oh, I on one in the same case, they had a commissioner and I filed a criminal complaint
[01:07:47.680 --> 01:07:51.800]  with the grand jury, but I don't think it got to the grand jury because I haven't got
[01:07:51.800 --> 01:08:00.800]  my letter back yet saying that it has, but I did, did you insure it?
[01:08:00.800 --> 01:08:01.800]  Yes.
[01:08:01.800 --> 01:08:03.800]  Oh, good.
[01:08:03.800 --> 01:08:09.360]  Have you sick the postal inspectors on them?
[01:08:09.360 --> 01:08:10.360]  Not yet.
[01:08:10.360 --> 01:08:21.080]  It's only been about 10 days now, so I'm waiting to see what I hope this does is get
[01:08:21.080 --> 01:08:29.760]  absolute confirmation from the postal inspectors that either the foreman got the document or
[01:08:29.760 --> 01:08:36.600]  someone else got the document in place of the foreman, and what they're likely to come
[01:08:36.600 --> 01:08:44.240]  back and say, well, when you send something to the foreman of the grand jury, the prosecuting
[01:08:44.240 --> 01:08:52.320]  attorney can accept that, and you're going to say, yeah, good luck with that.
[01:08:52.320 --> 01:09:03.680]  I sent it, the certified restricted, paid extra for restricted, not so specifically
[01:09:03.680 --> 01:09:10.240]  so that the prosecuting attorney would not intercept it.
[01:09:10.240 --> 01:09:15.240]  And this way you get absolute confirmation that the district attorney intercepted the
[01:09:15.240 --> 01:09:22.520]  document and then lied to the federal agents, the postal inspectors, about his authority
[01:09:22.520 --> 01:09:26.240]  to intercept.
[01:09:26.240 --> 01:09:33.240]  Now on these criminal complaints, should I, I should just make one accusation per complaint,
[01:09:33.240 --> 01:09:34.240]  right?
[01:09:34.240 --> 01:09:35.240]  Absolutely.
[01:09:35.240 --> 01:09:36.240]  Okay.
[01:09:36.240 --> 01:09:38.240]  That's what I'm doing.
[01:09:38.240 --> 01:09:43.680]  Yeah, I'm running out of ink, but I'm doing it.
[01:09:43.680 --> 01:09:50.920]  I made, I put all the complaints into one when I filed against the governor, because
[01:09:50.920 --> 01:09:54.000]  I was already in 150 pages.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:10:02.560]  If I'd have put separate complaints for each offense, it would have been about 300 pages.
[01:10:02.560 --> 01:10:06.720]  And there's no way I'd get the graduate to read the whole thing.
[01:10:06.720 --> 01:10:14.600]  So I had to crunch it down, but generally you want a separate complaint for, a separate
[01:10:14.600 --> 01:10:22.640]  document for each complaint, that way each specific complaint has to be addressed directly.
[01:10:22.640 --> 01:10:30.400]  If you put two complaints in one filing, they'll rule on one and ignore the other.
[01:10:30.400 --> 01:10:38.000]  Now with these commissioners and this judge that I'm talking about, he's done a temporary
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:45.160]  judge program, so you don't send the complaint directly to the judicial counsel, you send
[01:10:45.160 --> 01:10:53.920]  it to the presiding judge and then they send you back a letter stating their findings.
[01:10:53.920 --> 01:11:01.800]  But the assistant, the presiding judge, sent me back a letter on one of them and I barred
[01:11:01.800 --> 01:11:08.080]  grieve her for her statement and letter.
[01:11:08.080 --> 01:11:14.240]  And I'm waiting, now I've sent about 10 of these complaints to the presiding judge and
[01:11:14.240 --> 01:11:16.760]  I'm waiting for each one of those to return.
[01:11:16.760 --> 01:11:17.760]  Okay.
[01:11:17.760 --> 01:11:18.760]  Wait a minute.
[01:11:18.760 --> 01:11:21.320]  How is this structured?
[01:11:21.320 --> 01:11:29.840]  Who's telling you to send these to a presiding judge instead of the judicial counsel?
[01:11:29.840 --> 01:11:36.280]  Okay, the State Bar Association, are they telling you to do this?
[01:11:36.280 --> 01:11:43.480]  No, the judicial counsel, it's called the Commission on Judicial Performance.
[01:11:43.480 --> 01:11:45.480]  Oh, okay.
[01:11:45.480 --> 01:11:49.960]  So they're telling you not to send it to them, but to send it to this judge instead?
[01:11:49.960 --> 01:11:55.480]  Send it to them once you get the, first send it to the presiding judge, then he takes a
[01:11:55.480 --> 01:12:02.480]  look at it and he sends you his ruling and then you can send it to them from there.
[01:12:02.480 --> 01:12:10.040]  Well, another thing, what prevents you from sending it to both of them?
[01:12:10.040 --> 01:12:11.440]  Nothing, that's what I do.
[01:12:11.440 --> 01:12:12.440]  Good, good.
[01:12:12.440 --> 01:12:19.600]  Because what I suspect is, is the judicial counsel is the one that will have to report
[01:12:19.600 --> 01:12:24.360]  each one of these to their insurance carrier.
[01:12:24.360 --> 01:12:29.840]  So if they send you to this judge and he can circumvent this, then they don't have to count
[01:12:29.840 --> 01:12:30.840]  it.
[01:12:30.840 --> 01:12:31.840]  Oh, I see.
[01:12:31.840 --> 01:12:38.120]  I bet that's what they're doing, they want to keep their bond rating down.
[01:12:38.120 --> 01:12:46.520]  Well, I've got an envelope that I've put in, I'm ready to mail to Lloyds of London and
[01:12:46.520 --> 01:12:51.520]  ask him if, because no one wants to tell you who their bonding company is.
[01:12:51.520 --> 01:12:57.520]  So I was thinking about sending some of the components to Lloyds of London and let them
[01:12:57.520 --> 01:12:58.520]  figure it out.
[01:12:58.520 --> 01:13:04.520]  If there's a gun, Comptroller can help you.
[01:13:04.520 --> 01:13:10.200]  If the money's never secret, who pays the bill?
[01:13:10.200 --> 01:13:20.240]  What insurance companies or bonding agency is the bar association paying?
[01:13:20.240 --> 01:13:23.360]  Comptroller's got that information, not the bar.
[01:13:23.360 --> 01:13:24.360]  Okay.
[01:13:24.360 --> 01:13:30.600]  So, dig around on the backside.
[01:13:30.600 --> 01:13:42.360]  And in court, this judge, they lowered the charge from a misdemeanor to an infraction.
[01:13:42.360 --> 01:13:52.760]  And he handed me a letter, which is a policy from the presiding judge that he took it upon
[01:13:52.760 --> 01:14:02.040]  himself to lower the charges in some cases from a misdemeanor to an infraction.
[01:14:02.040 --> 01:14:09.920]  Well, my argument in court was by what authority did they do that?
[01:14:09.920 --> 01:14:16.280]  And that judge didn't want to hear me, he just said, you're guilty, we're through here.
[01:14:16.280 --> 01:14:20.840]  And the bailiff escorted me out of the room.
[01:14:20.840 --> 01:14:26.120]  So that's where I said I couldn't take off my, get my zipper going on my chicken suit.
[01:14:26.120 --> 01:14:29.000]  You couldn't get it off.
[01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:34.160]  So did you file criminal charges against the judge for oppression or official misconduct?
[01:14:34.160 --> 01:14:41.880]  Well, this is the judge I'm talking about right here that I sent in about 10, I haven't,
[01:14:41.880 --> 01:14:46.480]  that judge, I'm still working on the criminal complaints, I'm just getting the judicial
[01:14:46.480 --> 01:14:53.440]  complaints mailed off, and I'm working on the criminal complaints.
[01:14:53.440 --> 01:15:03.200]  Okay, let's talk about the governor of California and his executive orders.
[01:15:03.200 --> 01:15:05.800]  Have you looked at those?
[01:15:05.800 --> 01:15:13.840]  I haven't looked at those, I've been looking at your complaint, and I haven't looked at
[01:15:13.840 --> 01:15:23.880]  theirs, I'm kind of up to my, I'm interested in that, I'm interested in everything you're
[01:15:23.880 --> 01:15:33.480]  doing, Randy, I like the real estate thing you're getting ready to do, I like the mask
[01:15:33.480 --> 01:15:38.960]  thing, it's an easy way to have fun.
[01:15:38.960 --> 01:15:49.120]  The mask that I tell you what I did to the, my local courthouse here in Wise County, and
[01:15:49.120 --> 01:15:59.280]  that was so much fun, the, one of the officers I filed criminal complaints against, wants
[01:15:59.280 --> 01:16:03.640]  to talk to me off the record.
[01:16:03.640 --> 01:16:07.240]  Oh, interesting.
[01:16:07.240 --> 01:16:10.080]  Is that something you would do?
[01:16:10.080 --> 01:16:11.080]  Oh yeah.
[01:16:11.080 --> 01:16:12.080]  Okay.
[01:16:12.080 --> 01:16:17.920]  No, I'm not going after these guys, I made it clear, I said, look guys, I charged you
[01:16:17.920 --> 01:16:24.200]  with first degree felony aggravated assault, that was the most outrageous thing I could
[01:16:24.200 --> 01:16:30.760]  think of, and that's to make sure nothing bad happens to you, not after you, I'm after
[01:16:30.760 --> 01:16:35.840]  the higher ups, but I got to get through you to get to them, and they got that, but all
[01:16:35.840 --> 01:16:42.760]  these people have known me for 30 years, and they know I'd never do anything vindictive.
[01:16:42.760 --> 01:16:50.000]  Hang on, go into our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Lula Radio, I'm not going to give out the
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:56.040]  calling numbers, we've got two more callers and three more segments, so we should be good,
[01:16:56.040 --> 01:17:00.280]  we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.280 --> 01:17:04.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.920 --> 01:17:09.800]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method, Michael Mearris has
[01:17:09.800 --> 01:17:14.720]  won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two, you'll
[01:17:14.720 --> 01:17:19.560]  get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[01:17:19.560 --> 01:17:24.960]  rights statute, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:17:24.960 --> 01:17:29.600]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:17:29.600 --> 01:17:34.920]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away, the Michael Mearris proven
[01:17:34.920 --> 01:17:40.320]  method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors, personal consultation is available
[01:17:40.320 --> 01:17:45.680]  as well, for more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael
[01:17:45.680 --> 01:17:51.960]  Mearris banner, or email Michael Mearris at yahoo.com, that's ruleoflawradio.com, or
[01:17:51.960 --> 01:18:00.320]  email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors net.
[01:18:00.320 --> 01:18:04.960]  I love logos, without the shows on this network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends, I'm
[01:18:04.960 --> 01:18:08.960]  so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back, I need my truth pick, I'd be
[01:18:08.960 --> 01:18:14.280]  lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air, I love to volunteer
[01:18:14.280 --> 01:18:18.320]  as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give
[01:18:18.320 --> 01:18:22.200]  because I spend it all on supplements, how can I help logos?
[01:18:22.200 --> 01:18:27.360]  Well I'm glad you asked, whenever you order anything from Amazon you can help logos, with
[01:18:27.360 --> 01:18:32.200]  ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies, now go
[01:18:32.200 --> 01:18:39.040]  to logosradio network.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it, now when you order anything
[01:18:39.040 --> 01:18:44.480]  from Amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos, do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.480 --> 01:18:47.200]  No, do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.200 --> 01:18:48.200]  No!
[01:18:48.200 --> 01:18:49.200]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.200 --> 01:18:50.200]  No!
[01:18:50.200 --> 01:18:51.200]  I mean yes!
[01:18:51.200 --> 01:18:57.080]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect, thank you so much!
[01:18:57.080 --> 01:18:58.560]  We are logos!
[01:18:58.560 --> 01:19:21.760]  Happy Holidays Logos!
[01:19:21.760 --> 01:19:39.760]  Okay, we are back, Randy Carlson on this, the 23rd day of October 2020 and we're talking
[01:19:39.760 --> 01:19:48.400]  to Robert in California, okay Robert, I can think of other things but I'm sure the other
[01:19:48.400 --> 01:19:56.560]  colors have things to say too, okay, I just wanted to get your feedback on being violated
[01:19:56.560 --> 01:20:06.760]  by the COVID rule, okay, well keep it up Robert and keep us up to date, now we're going to
[01:20:06.760 --> 01:20:13.120]  go to Shane in New York, hello Shane, what do you have for us today?
[01:20:13.120 --> 01:20:18.840]  Hi Randy, how are you doing?
[01:20:18.840 --> 01:20:27.040]  Doing good, back up from the mic a little bit, okay, how's that?
[01:20:27.040 --> 01:20:40.680]  That's better, okay, talk, you're on, okay, sorry about that, so I was just going to mention
[01:20:40.680 --> 01:20:46.440]  one thing and I'll let you get to your last caller is I filed a less, a less pendants
[01:20:46.440 --> 01:20:55.280]  yesterday regarding the new law 1302A CPLR in New York stating that once jurisdiction
[01:20:55.280 --> 01:21:01.160]  is challenged, they must produce the original documents so I filed a less pendants, paid
[01:21:01.160 --> 01:21:08.440]  a $60 in the county court here in New York and I attached the law that Cuomo signed back
[01:21:08.440 --> 01:21:13.880]  in January of 2020.
[01:21:13.880 --> 01:21:14.880]  What does that law say?
[01:21:14.880 --> 01:21:22.040]  That's relatively new law, so good, yeah, the law, I did email it to you, I'm not sure
[01:21:22.040 --> 01:21:29.800]  if you had an opportunity to review it but it was, it's 13, let me see, I could pull
[01:21:29.800 --> 01:21:37.560]  up right now, it's 1302, this is good for anybody in New York and that law states that
[01:21:37.560 --> 01:21:38.560]  it's...
[01:21:38.560 --> 01:21:42.440]  Wait, 1302, what code?
[01:21:42.440 --> 01:21:53.160]  CPLR, hang on, I'll pull it up right now Randy, it's New York, okay, I'm sorry, New York RPA
[01:21:53.160 --> 01:22:19.560]  CPL1302A, that's New York, New York RPA CPL section 1302A, okay, what does it say?
[01:22:19.560 --> 01:22:25.880]  In that bill, it says that in summary, it says, provides a defense and a mortgage foreclosure
[01:22:25.880 --> 01:22:30.880]  action of the plan of lacking standing is not waived because the defendant's failure
[01:22:30.880 --> 01:22:35.760]  to raise such defense and his or her response in the pleadings.
[01:22:35.760 --> 01:22:43.680]  The old law is they had approximately 30 days to answer that, so if you were to serve today,
[01:22:43.680 --> 01:22:47.600]  you only had 30 days to bring that up.
[01:22:47.600 --> 01:22:52.560]  Now you can bring it up even after the sale of the profits and that bill number, by the
[01:22:52.560 --> 01:22:59.560]  way, is S5160, it was signed by four different legislators in New York, I don't have their
[01:22:59.560 --> 01:23:06.440]  names in front of me, but it goes on and it says here, Section 1 amends the real property
[01:23:06.440 --> 01:23:13.240]  action proceedings law by adding a new section called 1302A, which will provide any defense
[01:23:13.240 --> 01:23:18.360]  based upon plan of lack of standing and a foreclosure proceeding related to a home loan
[01:23:18.360 --> 01:23:24.520]  cannot be waived by defendant's failure to raise such a defense in a response, pleading
[01:23:24.520 --> 01:23:26.320]  or pre-answer motion.
[01:23:26.320 --> 01:23:31.720]  A defendant would not be able to raise that defense after the foreclosure sale unless the
[01:23:31.720 --> 01:23:35.600]  judgment of foreclosure sale was issued upon defendant's default.
[01:23:35.600 --> 01:23:38.440]  I hope you understand that last sentence.
[01:23:38.440 --> 01:23:40.600]  Read that again.
[01:23:40.600 --> 01:23:49.120]  A defendant would not be able to raise the defense after a foreclosure sale unless, unless
[01:23:49.120 --> 01:23:58.080]  the judgment of foreclosure and sale was issued upon the defendant's default.
[01:23:58.080 --> 01:24:07.400]  So if the defendant resisted the foreclosure, then they don't lose this claim.
[01:24:07.400 --> 01:24:08.400]  Right.
[01:24:08.400 --> 01:24:09.400]  Okay.
[01:24:09.400 --> 01:24:10.520]  All right.
[01:24:10.520 --> 01:24:11.520]  That's pretty clear.
[01:24:11.520 --> 01:24:14.720]  So that, that isn't it.
[01:24:14.720 --> 01:24:21.920]  That opens the door for a lot in, in New York because I've been talking to people about
[01:24:21.920 --> 01:24:29.720]  foreclosure defenses and they, a lot of people have been claiming that the security to securitization
[01:24:29.720 --> 01:24:32.480]  issue was dead.
[01:24:32.480 --> 01:24:44.000]  This seems to revive it because securitization goes to standing, but, and what, what they're
[01:24:44.000 --> 01:24:52.480]  saying is, is once you've securitized the mortgage, you've so clouded the issue of standing
[01:24:52.480 --> 01:24:58.760]  that the individual, and I just read an article by Neil Garfield on this and sending back
[01:24:58.760 --> 01:25:05.040]  a re, a rebuttal on it, or not a rebuttal, but ask for clarification to make sure I understood
[01:25:05.040 --> 01:25:07.280]  it right because it's pretty complex.
[01:25:07.280 --> 01:25:15.600]  But he was saying that in the securitization process, that even if you have an uninterrupted
[01:25:15.600 --> 01:25:24.280]  chain of holder status, that that, just because someone is named as a holder does not mean
[01:25:24.280 --> 01:25:30.320]  that they have standing to enforce the note, if they have been assigned the mortgage or
[01:25:30.320 --> 01:25:40.560]  assigned the note, but there's no evidence that they have any investment in the note,
[01:25:40.560 --> 01:25:47.120]  then they, they have no standing to invoke the jurisdiction of the court because they
[01:25:47.120 --> 01:25:49.520]  cannot show harm.
[01:25:49.520 --> 01:25:51.520]  Right.
[01:25:51.520 --> 01:25:52.520]  Yeah.
[01:25:52.520 --> 01:25:58.080]  They have nothing invested, so they, they can't show any harm, and so it's not enough
[01:25:58.080 --> 01:26:00.320]  for them to have a complete chain of title.
[01:26:00.320 --> 01:26:06.600]  Now they, what he's saying is, they have to show that they actually paid the previous
[01:26:06.600 --> 01:26:12.080]  holder so that they have something invested in the transaction.
[01:26:12.080 --> 01:26:16.760]  Contract's not a contract till something of value changes hands.
[01:26:16.760 --> 01:26:22.760]  Correct, and when I put it at the end of the notice of less pendants, hopefully I'm saying
[01:26:22.760 --> 01:26:23.760]  that right, Randy.
[01:26:23.760 --> 01:26:29.800]  I say a word a little bit off sometimes, at the end I put down, notice is further given
[01:26:29.800 --> 01:26:34.400]  that should the referee, Jennifer, I don't want to say her last name, but proceedings
[01:26:34.400 --> 01:26:39.800]  with the attempt of a sale of this property as scheduled for future pending date.
[01:26:39.800 --> 01:26:45.240]  And if the sale is not canceled, she does at her own jeopardy in violation of defendant's
[01:26:45.240 --> 01:26:55.840]  rights under New York state law, New York RPAL1302A, that the defendants do intend and
[01:26:55.840 --> 01:27:01.320]  will indeed file a lawsuit against all parties involved in any way with this illegal sale
[01:27:01.320 --> 01:27:05.320]  or attempt to transfer ownership of the interest to any other party.
[01:27:05.320 --> 01:27:09.640]  And then I finish up by stating that it's further noticed that any party attempts in
[01:27:09.640 --> 01:27:15.320]  the purchase of property ventures to do so at their own risk and full knowledge and awareness
[01:27:15.320 --> 01:27:20.600]  that the above mentioned motion to dismiss this foreclosure action in this case is pending
[01:27:20.600 --> 01:27:21.600]  in the court.
[01:27:21.600 --> 01:27:26.040]  And it lawsuit against the plaintiff for damages pending the New York state Supreme Court.
[01:27:26.040 --> 01:27:31.960]  The clerk has directed the index this too, and of course I put my name in my mom's name
[01:27:31.960 --> 01:27:32.960]  down there.
[01:27:32.960 --> 01:27:33.960]  Okay.
[01:27:33.960 --> 01:27:38.760]  Did you hear when Michael Pines was on the show?
[01:27:38.760 --> 01:27:39.760]  Yes.
[01:27:39.760 --> 01:27:49.000]  And he spoke to the vulnerability of the trustee since the trustee has a direct fiduciary duty
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:51.880]  to you.
[01:27:51.880 --> 01:27:56.320]  It makes the trustee even more vulnerable than the lawyers on the other side.
[01:27:56.320 --> 01:28:02.880]  Is the trustee, she's the referee, is the referee considered a trustee in the sale?
[01:28:02.880 --> 01:28:04.440]  I would think so.
[01:28:04.440 --> 01:28:05.440]  Okay.
[01:28:05.440 --> 01:28:07.400]  Just another name for it.
[01:28:07.400 --> 01:28:15.120]  I can't be sure in bankruptcy, but I would almost be certain that would have to be the
[01:28:15.120 --> 01:28:16.120]  trustee.
[01:28:16.120 --> 01:28:18.240]  Oh, this is not bankruptcy, Randy.
[01:28:18.240 --> 01:28:20.720]  We're back at the county level right here.
[01:28:20.720 --> 01:28:21.720]  Oh, okay.
[01:28:21.720 --> 01:28:23.880]  Then no, no, she wouldn't be a trustee.
[01:28:23.880 --> 01:28:26.120]  Oh, wait a minute.
[01:28:26.120 --> 01:28:27.920]  Only the trustee can do the sale.
[01:28:27.920 --> 01:28:31.720]  No, this is a mortgage state, so there isn't a trustee.
[01:28:31.720 --> 01:28:32.720]  Right.
[01:28:32.720 --> 01:28:37.720]  This is just the, this was filed in county court two days ago.
[01:28:37.720 --> 01:28:38.720]  Okay.
[01:28:38.720 --> 01:28:40.280]  Let me explain to everybody.
[01:28:40.280 --> 01:28:43.720]  A mortgage state deed of trust state.
[01:28:43.720 --> 01:28:50.520]  In a deed of trust, you have granted a confessed judgment against the property.
[01:28:50.520 --> 01:28:54.040]  So they can appoint a trustee and the trustee can sell the property.
[01:28:54.040 --> 01:29:00.680]  In a mortgage state, you have to go to court and sue and get the judge to issue you an
[01:29:00.680 --> 01:29:08.080]  order, that judgment, and then with the judgment, you don't need a trustee because you have
[01:29:08.080 --> 01:29:09.080]  the court's judgment.
[01:29:09.080 --> 01:29:10.080]  Okay.
[01:29:10.080 --> 01:29:11.080]  Go ahead.
[01:29:11.080 --> 01:29:12.080]  So what did you think?
[01:29:12.080 --> 01:29:13.080]  I just, I did it on my own.
[01:29:13.080 --> 01:29:14.080]  I think it sounds great.
[01:29:14.080 --> 01:29:22.160]  And I paid the $60 and the clerks were like, wow, what kind of crazy document do you have
[01:29:22.160 --> 01:29:23.160]  now?
[01:29:23.160 --> 01:29:29.200]  And so that's what I filed and it's, it's, there it is right here, $13 too, but anybody
[01:29:29.200 --> 01:29:31.320]  in New York, go look it up.
[01:29:31.320 --> 01:29:33.960]  Oh, this is wonderful.
[01:29:33.960 --> 01:29:37.920]  They're not going to know what to do with it because it's new law.
[01:29:37.920 --> 01:29:44.680]  That always, lawyers hate new law because they get tripped up on case laws, something
[01:29:44.680 --> 01:29:47.360]  they don't fully know and they hate that.
[01:29:47.360 --> 01:29:48.360]  Hang on.
[01:29:48.360 --> 01:30:01.680]  I'm going to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we'll be right back.
[01:30:01.680 --> 01:30:06.960]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America, if you build an electrical smart
[01:30:06.960 --> 01:30:12.480]  grid, the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic blackout under Catherine
[01:30:12.480 --> 01:30:16.440]  Albrecht back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:16.440 --> 01:30:18.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.160 --> 01:30:21.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.760 --> 01:30:26.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.760 --> 01:30:28.280]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.280 --> 01:30:31.880]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.880 --> 01:30:34.520]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.520 --> 01:30:40.120]  This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.120 --> 01:30:41.880]  Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:41.880 --> 01:30:45.960]  Start over with Start Page.
[01:30:45.960 --> 01:30:50.080]  These love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into your
[01:30:50.080 --> 01:30:52.480]  home too with a smart grid.
[01:30:52.480 --> 01:30:56.680]  So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric
[01:30:56.680 --> 01:30:59.800]  use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[01:30:59.800 --> 01:31:04.520]  But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast if we make the national power
[01:31:04.520 --> 01:31:08.760]  grid controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day.
[01:31:08.760 --> 01:31:13.600]  Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable
[01:31:13.600 --> 01:31:14.600]  to our enemies.
[01:31:14.600 --> 01:31:20.360]  I'd want to pose smart meters for privacy and health reasons, but catastrophic failures
[01:31:20.360 --> 01:31:21.360]  caused by hackers?
[01:31:21.360 --> 01:31:23.520]  There's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.520 --> 01:31:31.520]  I'm Dr. Kauffernal Brecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.520 --> 01:31:36.880]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.880 --> 01:31:39.080]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.080 --> 01:31:43.960]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.960 --> 01:31:47.960]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:47.960 --> 01:31:49.400]  force respond to this.
[01:31:49.400 --> 01:31:53.240]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a structural engineer, I'm a New York City correction officer,
[01:31:53.240 --> 01:31:57.960]  I'm an Air Force pilot, I'm a father who lost his son, we are Americans and we deserve
[01:31:57.960 --> 01:31:58.960]  the truth.
[01:31:58.960 --> 01:32:01.960]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.960 --> 01:32:05.960]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law of traffic similar.
[01:32:05.960 --> 01:32:09.440]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society, and if we the people are ever
[01:32:09.440 --> 01:32:13.440]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.440 --> 01:32:16.800]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:16.800 --> 01:32:20.840]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.840 --> 01:32:24.680]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:24.680 --> 01:32:26.200]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.200 --> 01:32:30.040]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:30.040 --> 01:32:33.800]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:33.800 --> 01:32:36.200]  is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.200 --> 01:32:40.160]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:40.160 --> 01:32:43.720]  ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The
[01:32:43.720 --> 01:32:47.960]  Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009
[01:32:47.960 --> 01:32:51.720]  seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how
[01:32:51.720 --> 01:32:55.600]  to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order
[01:32:55.600 --> 01:33:10.920]  your copy today, and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:10.920 --> 01:33:40.760]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelkin, Rule of Law Radio, and I'm going to talk to you about
[01:33:40.760 --> 01:33:41.760]  it.
[01:33:41.760 --> 01:33:47.920]  So, on this Friday, the 23rd day of October, 2020, and we're talking to Shane in New York
[01:33:47.920 --> 01:33:52.080]  Shane, is that about it for you?
[01:33:52.080 --> 01:33:56.720]  Yeah, I just, I failed to tell you that I did, before I followed the notice of last
[01:33:56.720 --> 01:34:03.760]  attendance, I followed a notice of appearance into the case in my mom's case at the county
[01:34:03.760 --> 01:34:09.920]  level, because just in case, by the way, they've extended suspension of all foreclosures
[01:34:09.920 --> 01:34:14.520]  in New York, all the way now until January the 1st.
[01:34:14.520 --> 01:34:21.600]  I expected that. Now I'm hearing rumblings about extensions on into the next year. We're
[01:34:21.600 --> 01:34:28.080]  going to wind up with people with the income properties that are just walking away from
[01:34:28.080 --> 01:34:35.640]  them, because they can't pay for them, they can't evict, they can't do anything, so this
[01:34:35.640 --> 01:34:39.040]  is going to really get ugly.
[01:34:39.040 --> 01:34:44.560]  I know, but I just want to let you know that I'm still working hard, and I followed the
[01:34:44.560 --> 01:34:48.120]  motion of dismiss for lack of jurisdiction of the original notes. I followed a notice
[01:34:48.120 --> 01:34:54.880]  of appearance on behalf of myself in the case, and I attached a quick claim to the notice
[01:34:54.880 --> 01:35:00.800]  of last attendance, and I'll just stop right there, because right now, everything's premature.
[01:35:00.800 --> 01:35:04.840]  I was going to follow a lot of free time, it looks like, so I'm not going to bother
[01:35:04.840 --> 01:35:08.400]  filing into these things rolling because it looks like it could go on a little bit further
[01:35:08.400 --> 01:35:10.400]  than January already.
[01:35:10.400 --> 01:35:17.760]  Okay, well wonderful, stay after them. I want to go to Olivier, he's got an interesting
[01:35:17.760 --> 01:35:28.000]  case on traffic. Okay, thank you Shane. Now we're going to Olivier, and I've got Tennessee
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:36.360]  on my database, but he's in Florida now. Olivier, tell us what you're doing down there.
[01:35:36.360 --> 01:35:44.520]  Well, going down there, right now, I'm submitting a board for business claim in the federal
[01:35:44.520 --> 01:35:54.520]  court, and through that process, I've got some information that they are reading through,
[01:35:54.520 --> 01:36:04.400]  which, I mean, Wyoming, I forgot, I sent you the email, but some people in the legislature
[01:36:04.400 --> 01:36:12.680]  forgot the names and everything were submitted a bill, and it got shot down, but basically,
[01:36:12.680 --> 01:36:25.680]  it was introducing a bill that would technically make their traffic law lawful. It addressed
[01:36:25.680 --> 01:36:36.120]  the discrepancy, if you have access to your email, I think my brother, I sent it to my
[01:36:36.120 --> 01:36:37.120]  brother's account, Jerry Oliver.
[01:36:37.120 --> 01:36:41.920]  Okay, this was, was it Delaware, or one of the East Coast states that did this a few
[01:36:41.920 --> 01:36:42.920]  years ago?
[01:36:42.920 --> 01:36:48.160]  I've got one state that I don't have there apparently.
[01:36:48.160 --> 01:36:53.600]  Anyways, one of the East Coast states, and what they said was, is that if you're not
[01:36:53.600 --> 01:37:05.240]  a commercial driver, that it would, the transportation department would send you a special, not a
[01:37:05.240 --> 01:37:12.840]  license, but a certificate to show that you were not a commercial operator. So it addressed
[01:37:12.840 --> 01:37:16.480]  this issue of commercial, non-commercial.
[01:37:16.480 --> 01:37:31.040]  And it also created a, meaning for that statute would be understood by the common man and have
[01:37:31.040 --> 01:37:44.040]  it be, and have the officers with instructions to know how to carry out the statute. So they,
[01:37:44.040 --> 01:37:49.640]  they supplied all the corrections that would basically be needed for someone to understand
[01:37:49.640 --> 01:37:57.360]  and the officers to understand when they read that statute, like the law states. So I was
[01:37:57.360 --> 01:37:59.760]  reading about, okay, that's cool, that's nice.
[01:37:59.760 --> 01:38:06.400]  Okay, wait a minute. Olivia has been taking on the issue of the cost of the way the statutes
[01:38:06.400 --> 01:38:16.920]  are written, that reasonable person of ordinary prudence can read them, and different people
[01:38:16.920 --> 01:38:22.320]  can come to different conclusions concerning the meaning of the statute. Therefore, the
[01:38:22.320 --> 01:38:33.080]  statute is unconstitutional and should be ruled void for vagueness. Is that essentially correct?
[01:38:33.080 --> 01:38:42.520]  Yes. Okay. And that statute also allows arbitrary enforcement and incarceration.
[01:38:42.520 --> 01:38:49.200]  Wait a minute. You said that statute allows arbitrary enforcement?
[01:38:49.200 --> 01:38:54.320]  Yes, because once it becomes, once the statute is in it.
[01:38:54.320 --> 01:38:58.400]  Okay, wait a minute. You said that statute. Which statute are you talking about? The one
[01:38:58.400 --> 01:39:00.640]  proposed on the East Coast?
[01:39:00.640 --> 01:39:07.720]  No, no, no, no. The one that we are under now, if you have a statute which two people
[01:39:07.720 --> 01:39:15.680]  can come to a different understanding, that statute has the ability to cause arbitrary
[01:39:15.680 --> 01:39:21.280]  enforcement and incarceration, because it may be covered in a right that you have is
[01:39:21.280 --> 01:39:30.840]  not clear enough, so now the judges and police officers are arresting you at their will, not
[01:39:30.840 --> 01:39:36.720]  what the law states, because there's still a debate about what the statute clearly means.
[01:39:36.720 --> 01:39:45.360]  If there's a debate, then there's a possibility that you've got it incorrect and you are violating
[01:39:45.360 --> 01:39:52.360]  the law by arresting people for something that they're not doing.
[01:39:52.360 --> 01:40:03.880]  Okay, now you're a bit too general. Let's go to a specific like Florida where you're
[01:40:03.880 --> 01:40:06.880]  at.
[01:40:06.880 --> 01:40:15.640]  What does Florida code say concerning who falls under transportation code?
[01:40:15.640 --> 01:40:22.120]  Everyone who's on the road. I don't have it in front of me, but I'll have the paperwork
[01:40:22.120 --> 01:40:27.160]  in front of me right now, but didn't, they take it as anyone who's on the road.
[01:40:27.160 --> 01:40:32.800]  You're building a challenge to code based on void for vagueness. Are you building one
[01:40:32.800 --> 01:40:35.760]  for Florida or Tennessee right now?
[01:40:35.760 --> 01:40:37.760]  Florida.
[01:40:37.760 --> 01:40:43.800]  Okay, how are you addressing, what statute are you addressing and how are you getting
[01:40:43.800 --> 01:40:45.920]  to void for vagueness?
[01:40:45.920 --> 01:40:52.160]  I'm getting to the statute that allows them to suspend your driver's license for fines
[01:40:52.160 --> 01:41:01.680]  and fees and the driver's license which requires, I mean the statute which requires a driver's
[01:41:01.680 --> 01:41:08.680]  license, a valid driver's license. I'm challenging suspended driver's license because it does
[01:41:08.680 --> 01:41:17.280]  not tell the officers who is required to have a driver's license. It does not tell the officers
[01:41:17.280 --> 01:41:28.560]  which conduct, which constitutional conduct is protected, which would resemble someone
[01:41:28.560 --> 01:41:38.080]  with a driver's license. So that statute is void for vagueness because it does not clearly
[01:41:38.080 --> 01:41:47.560]  state the parameters that the officers are allowed to regulate and arrest.
[01:41:47.560 --> 01:41:52.640]  Do you have that statute? It's kind of, I'm having trouble wrapping my head around what
[01:41:52.640 --> 01:41:59.880]  you're saying. I generally understand it but I need the statute in order to compare what
[01:41:59.880 --> 01:42:09.240]  you're saying to what I see in the verbiage of the statute.
[01:42:09.240 --> 01:42:12.560]  My statute or is it a driver's license?
[01:42:12.560 --> 01:42:15.880]  The statute we're challenging as void for vagueness.
[01:42:15.880 --> 01:42:22.520]  Is the driver's license a statute? If it's been a driver's license, that doesn't help.
[01:42:22.520 --> 01:42:25.800]  Do you have that in front of you so you can read it to us?
[01:42:25.800 --> 01:42:31.200]  No, I don't have it in front of me because I was going to ask for it.
[01:42:31.200 --> 01:42:37.480]  Okay, then am I not going to the place you wanted to go to?
[01:42:37.480 --> 01:42:45.840]  Well, yeah. You was trying to describe what happened. Right now I'm looking at the information
[01:42:45.840 --> 01:42:57.160]  that this state has cut out. At the first paragraph of what I sent you, I think it was like their
[01:42:57.160 --> 01:43:03.200]  purpose or the purpose of the paragraph and it was stating that...
[01:43:03.200 --> 01:43:08.760]  Okay, hold on. We're on the radio so people listening don't know what you sent me so you
[01:43:08.760 --> 01:43:15.760]  have to dress up a little bit more specifically so they'll understand what we're talking about.
[01:43:15.760 --> 01:43:21.200]  There are times about up this segment so hang on, we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:43:21.200 --> 01:43:25.360]  This is Randy Kelton, the Roodle Law Radio. I'm not going to give out the call-in number
[01:43:25.360 --> 01:43:35.560]  as we're going to our last segment and Olivier has got a really good case because Olivier
[01:43:35.560 --> 01:43:42.320]  was in Florida and you probably won't believe this but he had the audacity to drive in this
[01:43:42.320 --> 01:43:51.160]  Florida county while he was black. He really did that, didn't you Olivier? We'll be right
[01:43:51.160 --> 01:44:00.640]  back.
[01:44:00.640 --> 01:44:06.680]  Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.680 --> 01:44:11.400]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.400 --> 01:44:17.040]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.040 --> 01:44:22.520]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[01:44:22.520 --> 01:44:28.000]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to
[01:44:28.000 --> 01:44:33.680]  endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity so
[01:44:33.680 --> 01:44:39.720]  much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.720 --> 01:44:45.520]  When you order from Logos Radio Network dot com, your health will improve as you help
[01:44:45.520 --> 01:44:50.880]  support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to
[01:44:50.880 --> 01:44:57.280]  join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[01:44:57.280 --> 01:45:03.400]  and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:03.400 --> 01:45:08.720]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris
[01:45:08.720 --> 01:45:16.200]  Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:45:16.200 --> 01:45:22.000]  step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't
[01:45:22.000 --> 01:45:27.440]  have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step
[01:45:27.440 --> 01:45:34.080]  course and now you can too. Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22
[01:45:34.080 --> 01:45:39.840]  years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone
[01:45:39.840 --> 01:45:45.760]  should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:45.760 --> 01:45:51.960]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:51.960 --> 01:45:58.480]  pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:58.480 --> 01:46:28.040]  Or call toll-free, 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:28.040 --> 01:46:34.280]  OK, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Olivier in Florida.
[01:46:34.280 --> 01:46:44.560]  The reason I said that going out is Olivier sent me a video of a traffic stop where him
[01:46:44.560 --> 01:46:54.120]  and his brother are trying to get the officers to explain why they stopped him. It was clear
[01:46:54.120 --> 01:47:02.280]  they were at a business dropping off a car and the policemen saw them in this neighborhood
[01:47:02.280 --> 01:47:07.960]  and they were black and I wonder what they're doing in this neighborhood. They followed
[01:47:07.960 --> 01:47:15.480]  and finally pulled him over. This was as clear a case of worship profiling as I've ever seen.
[01:47:15.480 --> 01:47:24.160]  It was a great video because Olivier is asking the policemen what law they broke and what
[01:47:24.160 --> 01:47:29.560]  law she's talking about and she's stuttering and stammering and Olivier is chuckling and
[01:47:29.560 --> 01:47:36.960]  laughing at her at the same time. It was great. Then you got stopped a second time, didn't
[01:47:36.960 --> 01:47:56.520]  you Olivier? Same county. You have a suspended license in Florida and it was suspended for
[01:47:56.520 --> 01:48:07.160]  lack of payment of a fine. They stopped you. They didn't know that until they stopped you.
[01:48:07.160 --> 01:48:13.880]  Because you have two in quick succession, you have a great case for racial profiling.
[01:48:13.880 --> 01:48:23.280]  Now they arrested you because of this suspended license. Now you're taking on the fact that
[01:48:23.280 --> 01:48:29.560]  the law that, am I correct that you're taking on the law that allowed them to suspend the
[01:48:29.560 --> 01:48:41.160]  license for lack of payment of a fee or a fine? Yes. That and the requirements to have
[01:48:41.160 --> 01:48:51.000]  a license. Oh, both of those. Okay. Yes. So do you have the statute that requires you
[01:48:51.000 --> 01:49:04.160]  to have a license? No, I don't have it. But this... Can you paraphrase it? It basically
[01:49:04.160 --> 01:49:17.640]  says that a driver needs a driver's license, a certain class has certain classes and it
[01:49:17.640 --> 01:49:25.760]  didn't enlist the punishment for driving on suspended licenses. Okay. What I was getting
[01:49:25.760 --> 01:49:35.520]  at in most states, it says that if you operate a vehicle on the public highways, you have
[01:49:35.520 --> 01:49:43.480]  to have a license. But what most people miss about that is that's not a statute that's
[01:49:43.480 --> 01:49:52.120]  part of the general statute, the general laws. It's not what it says that makes it commercial.
[01:49:52.120 --> 01:49:59.760]  It's where it's at that makes it commercial. If it were in the general laws, then no matter
[01:49:59.760 --> 01:50:05.680]  what, if you operated a vehicle on the public highways, you would have to have a license.
[01:50:05.680 --> 01:50:14.160]  But this is in the transportation code, the commercial transportation code. So that only
[01:50:14.160 --> 01:50:23.120]  applies to commercial transportation. So when it says anyone who operates a motor vehicle
[01:50:23.120 --> 01:50:31.360]  on the highways of the state must have a license. Since it's in the commercial code,
[01:50:31.360 --> 01:50:45.840]  they must be operating in a commercial capacity. Right. So where are you making the distinction
[01:50:45.840 --> 01:50:57.760]  avoid for vagueness? Avoid for vagueness because it does not specify right that may be covered
[01:50:57.760 --> 01:51:09.920]  with conflict, meaning that resemble traffic. Okay. So you're saying here that I can move
[01:51:09.920 --> 01:51:19.960]  about the state for my private purposes. And it looks if you looked at me moving for my
[01:51:19.960 --> 01:51:27.600]  private person purposes, and you looked at me moving for commercial purposes, it would
[01:51:27.600 --> 01:51:36.720]  be almost impossible to directly distinguish the difference. Yeah. And you're saying that's
[01:51:36.720 --> 01:51:46.200]  what renders the statute for vagueness. Yeah, that's what renders the statute for vagueness.
[01:51:46.200 --> 01:51:54.560]  So if the statute said anyone who operates a motor vehicle on the streets at highways
[01:51:54.560 --> 01:52:03.320]  of the state of California for the purpose of commerce must have a license, would that
[01:52:03.320 --> 01:52:18.200]  fix the ambiguity? No. What else would we need to clarify? You would need information
[01:52:18.200 --> 01:52:30.040]  relating constitutional protected conduct that may resemble. You need to have instructions
[01:52:30.040 --> 01:52:38.600]  to the enforcement officers on how to deal with those. Okay. So I take the statute and
[01:52:38.600 --> 01:52:51.440]  I add the specific requirement for commerce. Then it no longer resembles traveling for
[01:52:51.440 --> 01:53:00.200]  private purposes. The officer must establish commerce as a condition. And this is an issue
[01:53:00.200 --> 01:53:08.800]  I've raised in Texas that I challenge the complaint is insufficient on its face, where
[01:53:08.800 --> 01:53:15.280]  the complaint alleges that the officer observed the person operating a motor vehicle on the
[01:53:15.280 --> 01:53:21.800]  streets at highways and saw him do this bad thing and that other bad thing. Objection,
[01:53:21.800 --> 01:53:30.760]  the complaint is insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court as
[01:53:30.760 --> 01:53:42.560]  one of the essential elements of the charge is missing. And that is the element of commerce.
[01:53:42.560 --> 01:53:48.560]  So while you're moving around, you know, I move around in a vehicle that has commercial
[01:53:48.560 --> 01:53:57.520]  license plates on it. And I have a commercial driver's license in my pocket. I can operate
[01:53:57.520 --> 01:54:03.720]  in commerce if I want to. I was pulled over in Austin once and the policeman asked me
[01:54:03.720 --> 01:54:11.760]  if I had a license. I said, yes, I do. But I'm not using it right now. And the officer
[01:54:11.760 --> 01:54:21.080]  got it immediately. Are you one of those guys? Yes, I am. Go on slow down. He didn't want
[01:54:21.080 --> 01:54:32.600]  to have the fight he had had it before. You're correct. It would address the fault. But if
[01:54:32.600 --> 01:54:37.600]  somebody wanted to challenge it before it was for vagueness, they still would win because
[01:54:37.600 --> 01:54:42.280]  there's a whole bunch of things that needs to be in place that the court said it would
[01:54:42.280 --> 01:54:48.320]  need to be in place to protect your constitutional rights. But what I was going with it was that
[01:54:48.320 --> 01:54:52.720]  where I was reading through all this, I was reading that paperwork that they submitted
[01:54:52.720 --> 01:55:00.840]  the bill that they submitted. And in the purpose title, it said that to correct all these faults
[01:55:00.840 --> 01:55:08.920]  so that it would not be violating the people's constitutional protected conduct. And then
[01:55:08.920 --> 01:55:19.600]  at the end, it said silent deception and judgment by fraud. So when I saw it, it looked
[01:55:19.600 --> 01:55:28.920]  like a claim to me. And that paper addressed all the faults that were in the statute. And
[01:55:28.920 --> 01:55:39.640]  I was wondering if we could refile a claim underneath that against the state because
[01:55:39.640 --> 01:55:53.440]  they failed to properly write the statute, apply the statute, and have been committing
[01:55:53.440 --> 01:56:02.880]  violent deception and inducement by fraud. I was trying to see, could that be a claim
[01:56:02.880 --> 01:56:09.240]  that could be in the purpose of the report? Okay, inducement by fraud, I don't see how
[01:56:09.240 --> 01:56:20.880]  we can get there because inducement would be the state doing something to get you to
[01:56:20.880 --> 01:56:28.560]  take an action for which they could legitimately make a claim. That's not what's happening
[01:56:28.560 --> 01:56:35.440]  here. It's not that you're doing anything for which a claim, a legitimate claim can
[01:56:35.440 --> 01:56:41.680]  be made. They're making claims that are not legitimate while you are doing something
[01:56:41.680 --> 01:56:52.880]  that's perfectly legal. Am I making sense on that? You went and drove of your own accord.
[01:56:52.880 --> 01:57:02.600]  You weren't induced to do this. They're just interpreting what you're doing as being in
[01:57:02.600 --> 01:57:09.440]  a commercial act when in fact it's not and they're prosecuting you as if it were and
[01:57:09.440 --> 01:57:15.120]  established fact that this is a commercial act when no such fact is before a court.
[01:57:15.120 --> 01:57:24.240]  There's the argument that you're not allowed to get on the road out of life. They've created
[01:57:24.240 --> 01:57:36.240]  that notion. That would definitely be unconstitutional and we have plenty of case law to support that.
[01:57:36.240 --> 01:57:43.840]  Officers thought to you that you must, I was arrested with two people who got arrested
[01:57:43.840 --> 01:57:52.000]  off for being on Mopad. I was looking at them like I was arrested with somebody else for
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  being drunk and I don't drink. I don't smell nothing and they blew 0-0-0 but they arrested
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:03.840]  them for being drunk. They're out of hand. That's true. They're out of hand and the
[01:58:03.840 --> 01:58:11.880]  way we need to fix that is go for them both criminally and sue them. Sue them quick, sue
[01:58:11.880 --> 01:58:12.880]  them often.
[01:58:12.880 --> 01:58:20.160]  But I'll try to figure out if those two were clear because we can do something with that.
[01:58:20.160 --> 01:58:27.680]  We're all, this whole show is working on building suits that people can file to start taking
[01:58:27.680 --> 01:58:34.560]  these guys on. Thank you, Olivier. We are out of time. This is Randy Kelton, The Wheel
[01:58:34.560 --> 01:58:41.560]  of Law Radio. We'll be back next week at our Thursday night show and Friday, both starting
[01:58:41.560 --> 01:58:50.560]  at 8 p.m. central. Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:50.560 --> 01:58:56.680]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.680 --> 01:59:02.120]  Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.120 --> 01:59:07.680]  what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of
[01:59:07.680 --> 01:59:16.680]  life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.680 --> 01:59:23.680]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:23.680 --> 01:59:30.360]  13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.360 --> 01:59:35.360]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery
[01:59:35.360 --> 01:59:51.360]  Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.360 --> 01:59:56.360]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.