ROL_2020-06-26_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetworks.com
[00:30.000 --> 00:40.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetworks.com
[01:00.000 --> 01:10.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.com
[01:30.000 --> 01:40.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.com
[02:00.000 --> 02:10.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[02:10.000 --> 02:20.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[02:20.000 --> 02:30.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[02:30.000 --> 02:50.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[02:50.000 --> 03:00.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[03:00.000 --> 03:10.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[03:10.000 --> 03:20.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[03:20.000 --> 03:30.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[03:30.000 --> 03:40.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[03:40.000 --> 03:50.000]  You were listening to the Logos Radio Network, Logos Radio Network.
[03:50.000 --> 04:00.000]  Well, I'll tell you what I have for you, Brett, and Deborah, and Eddie, a big hug.
[04:00.000 --> 04:08.000]  You've lit it up.
[04:08.000 --> 04:12.000]  I wanted to ask about jurisdiction.
[04:12.000 --> 04:28.000]  Of course, they say in the court, oh, we have jurisdiction, and when I questioned how the prosecutor established that, the judge didn't want to hear that too much.
[04:28.000 --> 04:32.000]  We'll then file criminally against the judge and sue him personally.
[04:32.000 --> 04:34.000]  What's that?
[04:34.000 --> 04:38.000]  Then you show we've got jurisdiction.
[04:38.000 --> 04:40.000]  I beg your pardon?
[04:40.000 --> 04:48.000]  In terms of jurisdiction, jurisdiction's lost, and it's the duty of the judge to prove up his jurisdiction.
[04:48.000 --> 04:50.000]  It's a threshold issue.
[04:50.000 --> 04:52.000]  He must prove it up.
[04:52.000 --> 04:56.000]  Is jurisdiction or is it the prosecutor's job?
[04:56.000 --> 04:58.000]  No, it's not the prosecutor's job.
[04:58.000 --> 05:06.000]  The prosecutor is not the one making threats against you if you don't do what the judge tells you.
[05:06.000 --> 05:08.000]  The judge does that.
[05:08.000 --> 05:10.000]  He can't, you said.
[05:10.000 --> 05:12.000]  Wait, say that again?
[05:12.000 --> 05:16.000]  How does he prove it up?
[05:16.000 --> 05:18.000]  By statute.
[05:18.000 --> 05:20.000]  Oh.
[05:20.000 --> 05:32.000]  And law, he has to show that the complainant has standing to file the complaint in the capacity in which it's filed.
[05:32.000 --> 05:38.000]  He then has to show that the complaint is sufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[05:38.000 --> 05:54.000]  And then he has to show that he has the jurisdiction over the type of subject matter and that he has venue over the subject matter.
[05:54.000 --> 06:02.000]  Which is the only one they tend to address and say, oh, the territorial jurisdiction, well, that's usually the only one they want to talk about.
[06:02.000 --> 06:10.000]  Yeah, well, all of these things are required and depends on what you challenge.
[06:10.000 --> 06:26.000]  We tend to challenge the standing of the officer to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court where the officer doesn't have authority to enforce the transportation code.
[06:26.000 --> 06:32.000]  Or where he does have authority to enforce the transportation code, the complaint is insufficient.
[06:32.000 --> 06:50.000]  And then it fails to state facts that establish that you are acting in a capacity that brings you within the scope of the statutory scheme being the commercial transportation code.
[06:50.000 --> 06:54.000]  All these things were challenged.
[06:54.000 --> 07:02.000]  But he has to prove it to be or prove it that he has it, right?
[07:02.000 --> 07:04.000]  Yes.
[07:04.000 --> 07:12.000]  He has to show statutory authority for the officer to enforce transportation code.
[07:12.000 --> 07:26.000]  And then he has to show that there are sufficient facts stated in the complaint to establish that you fall within the jurisdiction of the statutory scheme.
[07:26.000 --> 07:29.000]  You never do anything like that.
[07:29.000 --> 07:32.000]  So sue him personally.
[07:32.000 --> 07:39.000]  Well, that's right. That's part of what I'm trying to get to to build into my legal earth project.
[07:39.000 --> 07:50.000]  And when we start, if I can get the due process portion working, then we'll start building those tools in there.
[07:50.000 --> 07:58.000]  We'll build criminal charges against the judge for exerting or purporting to exert an authority he doesn't expressly have.
[07:58.000 --> 08:07.000]  And in the process to deny you in the due course of the laws, we can file that with either the state or the Fed.
[08:07.000 --> 08:23.000]  And when the federal courts start getting complaints by the hundreds, they're going to get annoyed at these local state officials and let them know you better do something about this.
[08:23.000 --> 08:28.000]  Or we're likely to come down on you.
[08:28.000 --> 08:32.000]  Well, this is how we're going to fix it.
[08:32.000 --> 08:37.000]  We need people to protest. We need to people show that they're upset.
[08:37.000 --> 08:44.000]  But protesting does not place a duty on the part of any public official.
[08:44.000 --> 08:49.000]  Verified criminal affidavits do.
[08:49.000 --> 08:55.000]  Randy, let me ask you something sort of a follow on to Robert's question.
[08:55.000 --> 09:14.000]  If and when a judge just blows past his responsibility to demonstrate jurisdiction and just decides he has it and keeps on going, is it more appropriate to do an interlocutory appeal event or a mandamus?
[09:14.000 --> 09:25.000]  Or would you just go ahead and say he's disqualified, put in a motion to disqualify? And then when he blows past that, then you have one more criminal charge, but you're going for interlocutory or mandamus?
[09:25.000 --> 09:38.000]  Not disqualified. These are not grounds to disqualify. The grounds for disqualification are very specific.
[09:38.000 --> 09:49.000]  He has an interest. He obviously has an interest. If he's not willing to decide if he has jurisdiction or not, he clearly wants to go after this person, right?
[09:49.000 --> 09:54.000]  Yeah, but that's not a demonstratable interest. That's an implied interest.
[09:54.000 --> 10:03.000]  It doesn't go to disqualification. It goes to official misconduct or official oppression.
[10:03.000 --> 10:14.000]  It certainly goes to that. If he fails to prove up his jurisdiction, then you have reason to believe and do believe that he has acted without jurisdiction authority.
[10:14.000 --> 10:21.000]  What can somebody like Robert do? Go talk to the appeals court in what capacity?
[10:21.000 --> 10:26.000]  With a mandamus or a petition for written mandamus?
[10:26.000 --> 10:32.000]  The mandamus to order the judge to prove up jurisdiction.
[10:32.000 --> 10:34.000]  Okay, there you go.
[10:34.000 --> 10:39.000]  They definitely won't like that, especially if it's traffic.
[10:39.000 --> 10:54.000]  They get a mandamus that they have to deal with, and if it'll go to a county court, which will just blow it off, and then you get to file an appeal to that, to the court of appeals.
[10:54.000 --> 11:01.000]  So now you're third step out, and they haven't even got...
[11:01.000 --> 11:07.000]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively affected our health?
[11:07.000 --> 11:14.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[11:14.000 --> 11:20.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[11:20.000 --> 11:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[11:25.000 --> 11:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[11:32.000 --> 11:40.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[11:40.000 --> 11:43.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[11:43.000 --> 11:47.000]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy. It's a fact.
[11:47.000 --> 11:52.000]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed.
[11:52.000 --> 11:56.000]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[11:56.000 --> 12:02.000]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry.
[12:02.000 --> 12:11.000]  The study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[12:11.000 --> 12:16.000]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any chances.
[12:16.000 --> 12:20.000]  I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[12:20.000 --> 12:25.000]  Look at your Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[12:50.000 --> 13:05.000]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[13:05.000 --> 13:11.000]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time.
[13:11.000 --> 13:14.000]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516.
[13:14.000 --> 13:21.000]  Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
[13:21.000 --> 13:26.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[13:26.000 --> 13:34.000]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[13:34.000 --> 13:40.000]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[13:40.000 --> 13:47.000]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development.
[13:47.000 --> 14:00.000]  So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[14:00.000 --> 14:10.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[14:31.000 --> 14:40.000]  These lessons are ready for the future lessons are ready for the future lessons are ready for the future
[14:40.000 --> 14:46.000]  Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me. Prosecute them wicked leaders, you see.
[14:46.000 --> 14:51.000]  They're my mother, I'm a liar, them tell me, them I'm a liar and I tell six stories.
[14:51.000 --> 14:56.000]  Make a billy, me say what them tell me, 3% of America vote for the future.
[14:56.000 --> 15:01.000]  I'm voting for the president, that's why we have a war when we push.
[15:01.000 --> 15:04.000]  But listen carefully, listen to the words of the Christians.
[15:04.000 --> 15:11.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio and we're talking to Robert in California.
[15:11.000 --> 15:22.000]  Okay, Robert, over the break I was looking up a video someone sent me and the video was...
[15:22.000 --> 15:32.000]  The guy was saying that the badge still has shine on it and he's before a microphone.
[15:32.000 --> 15:41.000]  Oh, I remember who it was. There's a site called...photographing is not a crime.
[15:41.000 --> 15:51.000]  And it was in one of those links where they linked to this policeman complaining about how they're being disparaged.
[15:51.000 --> 16:00.000]  And he makes a statement and they cut out and they go to the policeman beating up somebody or shooting somebody.
[16:00.000 --> 16:07.000]  And they come back to him and he talks a little bit and they go back to him beating up and killing somebody else.
[16:07.000 --> 16:12.000]  And just through the whole thing it was absolutely wonderful.
[16:12.000 --> 16:25.000]  But I'll try to find it and I was going to get it for Brett and I kind of lost it. I get so many emails every day they get buried really fast.
[16:25.000 --> 16:31.000]  But back to Robert in California.
[16:31.000 --> 16:45.000]  Okay, Robert, what is the disposition of your case right now? What have you filed?
[16:45.000 --> 16:55.000]  Oh, we could probably hear you better if I unmute you. Okay, now try it.
[16:55.000 --> 17:00.000]  Are you there, Robert?
[17:00.000 --> 17:04.000]  Yeah, looks like we've lost Robert again.
[17:04.000 --> 17:07.000]  Okay, Robert, oh no, Robert's gone.
[17:07.000 --> 17:09.000]  He just came back. He just popped back on the board.
[17:09.000 --> 17:17.000]  Okay, I had unmuted Jeff and my board hasn't refreshed. Let me refresh it and see if I can find him.
[17:17.000 --> 17:25.000]  There he goes. Okay, this is getting a little confusing. Somebody else just dropped off.
[17:25.000 --> 17:35.000]  No, I got the wrong one. My page is moving around. Okay, I've finally got you back, Robert.
[17:35.000 --> 17:51.000]  Okay, so I went to court for the first time. They sent me a hearing notice and when I got there I challenged their jurisdiction and things started to go sideways.
[17:51.000 --> 18:01.000]  But as I started to speak, the sheriff came from the side and he served me to complain.
[18:01.000 --> 18:12.000]  The bailiff came from the side and served me to complain. Up till then, I haven't been served to complain until that happened.
[18:12.000 --> 18:30.000]  And they've already, I've had warrants for my arrest and been in jail and all kinds of stuff. Anyway, so then the judge who was muffled, you know, he had his mask on and he just went really ballistic.
[18:30.000 --> 18:35.000]  I got the tape recorded of it. It's just almost unreal that it happened.
[18:35.000 --> 18:48.000]  Anyway, I kind of lost my, I didn't lose my cool, but I didn't object to some of the things he was saying because I couldn't really hear what he was talking about.
[18:48.000 --> 19:05.000]  But one of the things he did was he read the motions and he said the challenge to the notice of preservation of rights was denied and I didn't challenge that. I didn't object.
[19:05.000 --> 19:13.000]  Then the petition for disclosure, judicial disclosure, he said there's nothing to disclose.
[19:13.000 --> 19:27.000]  Then the one he really didn't like was the demand beneficiary, beneficiary, beneficiary.
[19:27.000 --> 19:48.000]  Say that again. It's, it's demand, B E N I F I D I E S. Bivins? Ben if, Fideas, Benefice, E E N I F I D I E S.
[19:48.000 --> 20:01.000]  And I found that somewhere in your, either jurisdictionary or, I mean, not jurisdictionary, imprudence or in the semi material.
[20:01.000 --> 20:06.000]  Yeah, I don't recognize that. So it's not, I don't think it's one of my motions.
[20:06.000 --> 20:15.000]  It's a demand for everyone in the prosecution's team to put up their post of office.
[20:15.000 --> 20:23.000]  Oh, excellent. I had no right to that at all.
[20:23.000 --> 20:25.000]  And I'm right to it. Wow.
[20:25.000 --> 20:34.000]  You should file a motion requesting a psyche vowel on the judge.
[20:34.000 --> 20:46.000]  Now what I did do though, because I wasn't sure, because they changed venue venues on me. So the case was a couple of weeks going to coming up, they changed the venue.
[20:46.000 --> 20:54.000]  And I, I went ahead and resubmitted altered those motions and resubmitted them.
[20:54.000 --> 21:00.000]  And I want the new judge to rule on where I can get a chance to object.
[21:00.000 --> 21:06.000]  And they, they won't be, they won't rule on the second time.
[21:06.000 --> 21:13.000]  You can claim that you weren't sure if they were, needs to be resubmitted or not, but they'll, they'll get unhappy about that.
[21:13.000 --> 21:18.000]  You set, definitely need to file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge.
[21:18.000 --> 21:28.000]  And you might look at a criminal complaint if he blew off your subject matter jurisdiction challenge, then you charging criminally.
[21:28.000 --> 21:34.000]  I think it would be appropriate to put in a motion for rehearing.
[21:34.000 --> 21:42.000]  No, definitely that the judge was a emotionally unstable.
[21:42.000 --> 21:50.000]  And what the bailiff did was that it was out underhanded by them to disturb me in my opening statement there.
[21:50.000 --> 21:53.000]  Oh, absolutely.
[21:53.000 --> 21:57.000]  A judge gets out of hand with me. I want to ask the bailiff to arrest him.
[21:57.000 --> 21:59.000]  Right.
[21:59.000 --> 22:04.000]  So, well, before he never called the case, I have two cases.
[22:04.000 --> 22:07.000]  He never called either case number as he was ramping.
[22:07.000 --> 22:12.000]  And then he said, you are done here today.
[22:12.000 --> 22:15.000]  You are done here today.
[22:15.000 --> 22:17.000]  I said, wait, I have a second case.
[22:17.000 --> 22:21.000]  He said, I said, you're done here today.
[22:21.000 --> 22:25.000]  Mr. Bayliff, arrest that judge.
[22:25.000 --> 22:27.000]  That works for him.
[22:27.000 --> 22:32.000]  And let him threaten you with contempt for asking the bailiff to arrest him.
[22:32.000 --> 22:34.000]  Yeah, that works.
[22:34.000 --> 22:39.000]  I've done that several times and never has the judge did anything to keep his mouth shut.
[22:39.000 --> 22:42.000]  One judge said, Mr. Counselor, you can't do that.
[22:42.000 --> 22:43.000]  Of course I can do that.
[22:43.000 --> 22:46.000]  Hey, arrest him.
[22:46.000 --> 22:47.000]  Yes.
[22:47.000 --> 22:54.000]  But at least when you step out of the courtroom, then you call the bailiff over and ask him to go in there and arrest the judge.
[22:54.000 --> 22:57.000]  And that gets things interesting.
[22:57.000 --> 23:06.000]  Everybody waits until the case is over to try to do something about the crimes these people are committing.
[23:06.000 --> 23:09.000]  You should not wait five minutes.
[23:09.000 --> 23:11.000]  Okay.
[23:11.000 --> 23:18.000]  My favorite one was the hearing aid gambit I pulled on the judge in Mansfield, Texas.
[23:18.000 --> 23:29.000]  And when he wouldn't provide me with accommodations and hearing and prayer, when I walked out of the courtroom, I told the bailiff to come with me and ask him to go in there and arrest the judge.
[23:29.000 --> 23:33.000]  Oh, that was so much fun.
[23:33.000 --> 23:40.000]  But never did I get any trouble for asking the bailiff to arrest somebody.
[23:40.000 --> 23:46.000]  The bailiff starts doing this little chicken dance and everybody starts getting nervous.
[23:46.000 --> 23:48.000]  You should use that quickly.
[23:48.000 --> 24:01.000]  If the judge is yelling at you and losing his professional composure, that gives you reason to believe that he is psychologically unstable.
[24:01.000 --> 24:05.000]  And you file a motion for a psychoval.
[24:05.000 --> 24:07.000]  Were you recording this?
[24:07.000 --> 24:09.000]  Yes.
[24:09.000 --> 24:11.000]  Don't tell them.
[24:11.000 --> 24:12.000]  Make a transcript.
[24:12.000 --> 24:14.000]  I got it from them.
[24:14.000 --> 24:17.000]  They sent me.
[24:17.000 --> 24:18.000]  Wait a minute.
[24:18.000 --> 24:22.000]  What is the nature of the case?
[24:22.000 --> 24:25.000]  I take it this is not a traffic ticket.
[24:25.000 --> 24:27.000]  Yes, it's traffic.
[24:27.000 --> 24:28.000]  And the recording?
[24:28.000 --> 24:30.000]  Wonderful.
[24:30.000 --> 24:43.000]  In that case, you can send the recording in with your judiciconda complaint and attach it or a transcript of it to your motion for psychoval.
[24:43.000 --> 24:46.000]  And then see if the judge is happy.
[24:46.000 --> 24:53.000]  They're going to get me a transcript. They said that would take 14 days.
[24:53.000 --> 24:57.000]  Well, hopefully some more about that after we go to our sponsors.
[24:57.000 --> 25:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[25:00.000 --> 25:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[25:06.000 --> 25:09.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[25:09.000 --> 25:11.000]  And it's time we changed all that.
[25:11.000 --> 25:17.000]  The primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[25:17.000 --> 25:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevedee can provide the nutrients you need.
[25:25.000 --> 25:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[25:31.000 --> 25:34.000]  We have come to trust young Jevedee so much.
[25:34.000 --> 25:39.000]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[25:39.000 --> 25:47.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[25:47.000 --> 25:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevedee, you may want to join us.
[25:51.000 --> 26:00.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[26:00.000 --> 26:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[26:03.000 --> 26:13.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[26:13.000 --> 26:18.000]  step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[26:18.000 --> 26:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[26:22.000 --> 26:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[26:27.000 --> 26:33.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[26:33.000 --> 26:42.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[26:42.000 --> 26:51.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[26:51.000 --> 27:00.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[27:22.000 --> 27:29.000]  Yes, always I must be careful what I'm wishing for.
[27:29.000 --> 27:34.000]  When I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm wishing for.
[27:34.000 --> 27:40.000]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton.
[27:40.000 --> 27:46.000]  I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons.
[27:46.000 --> 27:52.000]  I get my message out with anyone in the shouting distance.
[27:52.000 --> 27:57.000]  I'm both for bravery and against slavery, showing resistance.
[27:57.000 --> 28:02.000]  First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting.
[28:02.000 --> 28:10.000]  I'm just so glad to make my living, pushing buttons.
[28:10.000 --> 28:15.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[28:15.000 --> 28:20.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[28:20.000 --> 28:22.000]  Shut down, supply monopoly.
[28:22.000 --> 28:25.000]  We all wanted to win the game.
[28:25.000 --> 28:28.000]  We gave some guys this money supply.
[28:28.000 --> 28:30.000]  OK, we are back.
[28:30.000 --> 28:34.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruleoflaw Radio.
[28:34.000 --> 28:39.000]  And, let's see where you're at.
[28:39.000 --> 28:44.000]  I have to dig around in my call list to find you because you dropped off.
[28:44.000 --> 28:51.000]  Okay, so this is just a, they're actually recording classy misdemeanors.
[28:51.000 --> 28:52.000]  That's wonderful.
[28:52.000 --> 28:57.000]  So a motion for a psyche valve for the judge will be great.
[28:57.000 --> 29:00.000]  And is this judge, he's almost certainly a lawyer.
[29:00.000 --> 29:12.000]  I didn't check the bar for him. The one of the other ones is a lawyer, but I didn't check the bar for him.
[29:12.000 --> 29:16.000]  Yeah, all of these municipal judges are generally lawyers.
[29:16.000 --> 29:20.000]  They do this because they're not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
[29:20.000 --> 29:25.000]  Because if they were, they wouldn't be down here in the municipalities grubbing for dollars.
[29:25.000 --> 29:27.000]  They'd be out making the big bucks.
[29:27.000 --> 29:34.000]  Do you have a psych motion example at all?
[29:34.000 --> 29:38.000]  Great. Say that again.
[29:38.000 --> 29:45.000]  Do you have a psych motion example in the seminar?
[29:45.000 --> 29:47.000]  No.
[29:47.000 --> 29:56.000]  In my legal 101, I don't have motions and pleadings already made up.
[29:56.000 --> 30:00.000]  I've got a bunch of stuff on jurisprudence.
[30:00.000 --> 30:04.000]  Right. That's where I wondered if you had one in there.
[30:04.000 --> 30:11.000]  Not for that. That is, what's that called? In Texas, it has a special name.
[30:11.000 --> 30:14.000]  Mental health evaluation.
[30:14.000 --> 30:21.000]  No, there's a guy's name. It's a, I'll think of it in a minute.
[30:21.000 --> 30:30.000]  Well, I can go down into the county and find it at the Law Library.
[30:30.000 --> 30:37.000]  It annoys me that I can't remember it. That's the first time I didn't remember that one, but it's a long time since I've addressed it.
[30:37.000 --> 30:43.000]  It's called a something hearing. It'll come to me sometime during the show.
[30:43.000 --> 30:45.000]  Take here.
[30:45.000 --> 30:47.000]  Don't bear it.
[30:47.000 --> 30:49.000]  Don't bear it.
[30:49.000 --> 30:54.000]  That's it. It's a Dolbert's hearing.
[30:54.000 --> 30:58.000]  So you can do Dolbert's hearing in California and you might get a hit on it.
[30:58.000 --> 31:08.000]  Generally, the requirement for one of those is in case law and when a case is seminal and it,
[31:08.000 --> 31:18.000]  what do you call it, a first blush case, they generally name that whatever the case requires.
[31:18.000 --> 31:23.000]  They name it after the guy, like we have a Frank's hearing.
[31:23.000 --> 31:32.000]  And that's a hearing where you believe a officer lied to the magistrate to get a warrant and you'd ask for a Frank's hearing.
[31:32.000 --> 31:40.000]  When you ask for a Psychoval, you ask for a Psychoval, then you ask for a Dolbert's hearing.
[31:40.000 --> 31:47.000]  And just looking up yesterday, we were talking about an Anderson hearing and never did figure out what that was.
[31:47.000 --> 32:00.000]  But anyway, look up, do a search for Dolbert, D-A-U-G-H-B-E-R-T, and then in California behind it and see if you find the equivalent.
[32:00.000 --> 32:07.000]  It's always nice to ask for a hearing by name, but that'll really embarrass the judge.
[32:07.000 --> 32:12.000]  I may not have a G-H in there. I seem to remember seeing D-A-U-B-E-R-T.
[32:12.000 --> 32:18.000]  That could be. I've made a mistake once.
[32:18.000 --> 32:19.000]  Yeah.
[32:19.000 --> 32:21.000]  Okay, it could be E-E-R-T.
[32:21.000 --> 32:29.000]  I can just ask for a re-hearing on the motions, hopefully.
[32:29.000 --> 32:34.000]  Because the judge appeared to be emotionally unstable at the hearing.
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  Okay, perfect.
[32:36.000 --> 32:40.000]  Just something to embarrass him good.
[32:40.000 --> 32:43.000]  Mental incompetency.
[32:43.000 --> 32:57.000]  Too much time, but I want to tell you that I had a little run-in with the police and after a couple of them rousted me, I called 911 on the sergeant,
[32:57.000 --> 33:01.000]  and it was an absolute gas.
[33:01.000 --> 33:04.000]  Worked, didn't it?
[33:04.000 --> 33:06.000]  What's that?
[33:06.000 --> 33:08.000]  It said it worked, didn't it?
[33:08.000 --> 33:09.000]  Oh, it didn't work.
[33:09.000 --> 33:12.000]  You get to see that little chicken dance?
[33:12.000 --> 33:20.000]  Well, when he saw that I was 911, he took off like a ruptured duck, went up the hill, paged back and forth.
[33:20.000 --> 33:30.000]  When he heard me and the 911 operator, I think I got problems with her. I can't wait to get that recording because she asked me what nationality was.
[33:30.000 --> 33:34.000]  And I said, I have no idea what nationality is.
[33:34.000 --> 33:36.000]  She said, well, what color is he?
[33:36.000 --> 33:38.000]  I said, I don't know what color he is.
[33:38.000 --> 33:39.000]  He got it done.
[33:39.000 --> 33:42.000]  She said, that's my boss.
[33:42.000 --> 33:49.000]  I said, I don't care if it's your boss. Send someone down here.
[33:49.000 --> 33:51.000]  Your problem, not my problem.
[33:51.000 --> 33:53.000]  Get someone down.
[33:53.000 --> 33:55.000]  That had to be fun.
[33:55.000 --> 33:59.000]  I keep telling people how much fun that is.
[33:59.000 --> 34:06.000]  What are they going to do when you call 911 on them?
[34:06.000 --> 34:11.000]  It's a felony in Texas to interfere with a 911 call.
[34:11.000 --> 34:24.000]  And you call 911 accusing a policeman of committing a crime. Were they going to do a policeman pull me over because my registration was expired.
[34:24.000 --> 34:30.000]  And I called 911 to ask them to arrest him for first degree felony aggravated assault.
[34:30.000 --> 34:35.000]  Oh, that was great fun.
[34:35.000 --> 34:46.000]  And the worst part is they could tell I was trying not to snicker while it was going on.
[34:46.000 --> 34:53.000]  The policeman came back with a ticket and he was so furious his hand was shaking.
[34:53.000 --> 34:57.000]  And then I wouldn't give him back his pen.
[34:57.000 --> 35:01.000]  You got real excited about that.
[35:01.000 --> 35:09.000]  Anyway, when a cop starts getting agitated, he's got a gun.
[35:09.000 --> 35:12.000]  He can't afford to get agitated.
[35:12.000 --> 35:20.000]  If I get any reason that I can claim that he appears to be emotionally unstable.
[35:20.000 --> 35:23.000]  I'm calling 911.
[35:23.000 --> 35:27.000]  Brett, you remember the cop that gave you the ticket in Cumbie?
[35:27.000 --> 35:29.000]  Yeah.
[35:29.000 --> 35:35.000]  I'm talking to him on the side of the highway and he's on the driver's side.
[35:35.000 --> 35:40.000]  And I took out my cell phone and he said, I need you to put that down while I'm talking to you.
[35:40.000 --> 35:48.000]  I said, no, I think I need to call 911 because you are agitated and you're wearing a pistol.
[35:48.000 --> 35:54.000]  Do I need to call 911 and get someone down here to keep you under control?
[35:54.000 --> 36:00.000]  He looked at me for a minute like he didn't believe I said that.
[36:00.000 --> 36:03.000]  And then he took a deep breath and exhaled out.
[36:03.000 --> 36:07.000]  No, Mr. Kelton, you do not need to call 911.
[36:07.000 --> 36:13.000]  And I didn't have any more problem from you.
[36:13.000 --> 36:16.000]  So, Jeff, what happened?
[36:16.000 --> 36:20.000]  Robert, what happened after the 911 call?
[36:20.000 --> 36:22.000]  Did they send someone out?
[36:22.000 --> 36:34.000]  They arrested on a responder and when he got there, he came down with the other officer who had just approached me, the one that got the sergeant on me.
[36:34.000 --> 36:41.000]  And he started to ask me what was going on and then he started to walk away.
[36:41.000 --> 36:45.000]  And as he walked away, he said, are you mentally ill?
[36:45.000 --> 36:47.000]  As he walked away, I said, what did you say?
[36:47.000 --> 36:49.000]  He kept walking.
[36:49.000 --> 36:52.000]  Finally, I waited for him.
[36:52.000 --> 36:54.000]  I called his phone number on the car.
[36:54.000 --> 36:58.000]  He gave me to tell him I was still waiting there for him.
[36:58.000 --> 37:03.000]  And so then I went up and stood by his patrol car and waited for him to get back.
[37:03.000 --> 37:09.000]  And when he came back up, he said, I said, are you going to write a report or not?
[37:09.000 --> 37:14.000]  He said, no, no, there's been plenty of internal communications over this.
[37:14.000 --> 37:17.000]  I'm not going to write a report.
[37:17.000 --> 37:21.000]  You need to file charges against him.
[37:21.000 --> 37:23.000]  Well, I've already got those written up.
[37:23.000 --> 37:26.000]  I've got it ready to roll.
[37:26.000 --> 37:28.000]  OK, that's great.
[37:28.000 --> 37:30.000]  That's great.
[37:30.000 --> 37:32.000]  OK, I'll let you go.
[37:32.000 --> 37:34.000]  OK, thank you, Robert.
[37:34.000 --> 37:39.000]  OK, now we're going to go to Jeff in South Carolina.
[37:39.000 --> 37:41.000]  Hello, Jeff.
[37:41.000 --> 37:44.000]  Hello, Randy and Brett.
[37:44.000 --> 37:47.000]  What do you have for us today?
[37:47.000 --> 37:50.000]  Well, I have a little bit of an update.
[37:50.000 --> 38:01.000]  I had called back mid-March maybe and lines of case where my son and grandson ran into a little trouble with the Pennsylvania law.
[38:01.000 --> 38:05.000]  OK, I think everybody remembers that one.
[38:05.000 --> 38:07.000]  How is that going?
[38:07.000 --> 38:14.000]  Well, the grandson got a little slow in turning out the paperwork.
[38:14.000 --> 38:18.000]  I was trying to do the bulk of the framework and we'd work it over a little bit.
[38:18.000 --> 38:22.000]  And he was just trying to drag in his feet and getting some of that stuff out.
[38:22.000 --> 38:27.000]  And I know I've reviewed a couple of them three or four times and they just never seem to get sent.
[38:27.000 --> 38:34.000]  But eventually we got around to getting two judicial misconduct complaints out.
[38:34.000 --> 38:43.000]  We sent a private criminal complaint to the neighboring district justice.
[38:43.000 --> 38:47.000]  He sent it back saying it wasn't in his jurisdiction.
[38:47.000 --> 38:52.000]  We should send it to the DA's office.
[38:52.000 --> 38:53.000]  Then we did that.
[38:53.000 --> 38:56.000]  We sent it to the DA's office.
[38:56.000 --> 39:02.000]  And the DA says, I don't have enough evidence.
[39:02.000 --> 39:06.000]  Now that's a good answer.
[39:06.000 --> 39:09.000]  That is a much better answer than the one I got.
[39:09.000 --> 39:11.000]  He said, I'm just not going to prosecute.
[39:11.000 --> 39:14.000]  He said, oh, yeah, we'll see how that works for you.
[39:14.000 --> 39:18.000]  Well, I'm the one that has to say, yeah, we'll see how that works out for you.
[39:18.000 --> 39:24.000]  And then I filed against him with the state attorney general and with the court of common please.
[39:24.000 --> 39:26.000]  And we pushed that one.
[39:26.000 --> 39:29.000]  I helped him all the way up to the court of appeals.
[39:29.000 --> 39:35.000]  And I understand they went on to the Supreme, but I wasn't able to follow it that far.
[39:35.000 --> 39:39.000]  But that's what you can do in Pennsylvania.
[39:39.000 --> 39:44.000]  And in every other state, you have all of these things you can do to them.
[39:44.000 --> 39:49.000]  But the prosecutor saying, I don't have enough evidence, that's...
[39:49.000 --> 39:53.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[39:53.000 --> 40:00.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[40:00.000 --> 40:05.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[40:05.000 --> 40:12.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[40:12.000 --> 40:17.000]  The free books are a three volume set called basic elements of the Christian life.
[40:17.000 --> 40:27.000]  Chapter by chapter, basic elements of the Christian life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[40:27.000 --> 40:40.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the Christian life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[40:40.000 --> 40:44.000]  That's 888-551-0102.
[40:44.000 --> 40:49.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[40:49.000 --> 41:17.000]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[41:17.000 --> 41:20.000]  Oil, Texas Crude, $55.63 of barrel.
[41:20.000 --> 41:23.000]  Brent Crude, $62.47 of barrel.
[41:23.000 --> 41:25.000]  And Crypto is an order of market cap.
[41:25.000 --> 41:28.000]  Bitcoin Core, $10,566.52.
[41:28.000 --> 41:31.000]  Ethereum, $227.26.
[41:31.000 --> 41:34.000]  XRP, Ripple, $0.33.
[41:34.000 --> 41:36.000]  Litecoin, $100.31.
[41:36.000 --> 41:45.000]  And Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 of crypto coin.
[41:45.000 --> 41:59.000]  Today in History, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day Bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and injuring 40.
[41:59.000 --> 42:04.000]  Today in History.
[42:04.000 --> 42:24.000]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven to Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC.
[42:24.000 --> 42:33.000]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[42:33.000 --> 42:47.000]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works.
[42:47.000 --> 43:01.000]  As well as other cities too, like the district attorney in El Paso, Kaima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[43:01.000 --> 43:12.000]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[43:12.000 --> 43:22.000]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[43:22.000 --> 43:38.000]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[43:38.000 --> 43:53.000]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[43:53.000 --> 44:11.000]  This is Ruth Rodeo with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[44:23.000 --> 44:42.000]  Okay, we are back ready kelton wet fountain with my radio and we're talking to Jeff in South Carolina.
[44:42.000 --> 44:48.000]  So has anything come of what you have filed?
[44:48.000 --> 44:53.000]  Well, that's where I was going to hit here.
[44:53.000 --> 45:02.000]  We did send the district justice to request for information which went unanswered.
[45:02.000 --> 45:11.000]  There was a total of three challenges of jurisdiction sent in every time she would send out like a restigialing there is because of COVID.
[45:11.000 --> 45:12.000]  We answered it.
[45:12.000 --> 45:25.000]  We didn't let it go on challenge and where we came up on the DA, we sent the DA on the 17th of April, criminal complaint against her.
[45:25.000 --> 45:27.000]  On May 1, we got it back.
[45:27.000 --> 45:28.000]  I'm sorry.
[45:28.000 --> 45:33.000]  On April 23, we got it back.
[45:33.000 --> 45:37.000]  Anyhow, they said it was a lack of documentation.
[45:37.000 --> 45:44.000]  So we generated all the documents, our challenges or the summons, the complaint.
[45:44.000 --> 45:59.000]  And what we're going on there on the first complaint was that the district justice did not get district attorneys review for the private criminal complaint as required.
[45:59.000 --> 46:08.000]  And we got all the documentation sent in and we haven't heard anything yet from them.
[46:08.000 --> 46:12.000]  Well, they didn't just blow it off.
[46:12.000 --> 46:14.000]  That's correct.
[46:14.000 --> 46:20.000]  That indicates that now they're sensitive with everything up in arms.
[46:20.000 --> 46:23.000]  They may not want to be on YouTube.
[46:23.000 --> 46:40.000]  Well, the Judicial Conduct Board did acknowledge that they've received a judicial conduct complaint, but there's been two more sent in since.
[46:40.000 --> 47:00.000]  Now, on June 17, and this is kind of the menace, I would say, we sent the documentation on those on three criminal complaints against the district justice and the third judicial misconduct to the Judicial Conduct Board.
[47:00.000 --> 47:13.000]  On the following get, oh, and also a former pauperist to the clerk of courts, so we would be able to do a mandamus or other appeals without getting hit with bees.
[47:13.000 --> 47:33.000]  But on the following day, they got a notice of summary trial from the district justice in the adjoining territory.
[47:33.000 --> 47:47.000]  It is the same district justice that we sent the first criminal complaint and he sent it back and said it's not within his jurisdiction, we should send it to the DA.
[47:47.000 --> 48:00.000]  Now, there's been no word from the first district justice that the case has been transferred or is no longer in effect, but we still have a standing trial date.
[48:00.000 --> 48:07.000]  But the final subject matter jurisdiction challenge with which one?
[48:07.000 --> 48:11.000]  With the judge who's claiming jurisdiction now.
[48:11.000 --> 48:21.000]  Yes, what we did is we set up a challenge. We haven't sent it yet, but we're about 98% ready to go.
[48:21.000 --> 48:36.000]  But all that we got was a notice of a summer hearing and it's based on having a non-student and non-pupil having used tobacco on school.
[48:36.000 --> 48:57.000]  There is no other documentation, nothing, so I don't know, maybe I'm being too technical, but I'm saying in reality he didn't serve a complaint with his notice, so we're guessing that it's transferred from the other district justice and it's the same case.
[48:57.000 --> 49:07.000]  That's why I say file a subject matter jurisdiction challenge. Who the heck are you? Why are you sending us this notice?
[49:07.000 --> 49:13.000]  We don't know what it's about and we challenge your authority to send that to us.
[49:13.000 --> 49:19.000]  We might say you suspect this was sent in error, please correct it.
[49:19.000 --> 49:41.000]  Okay, now we did send an information request in for their right to know officer and appeals and any on that docket number, the criminal file on the docket number and any change of venue documentation.
[49:41.000 --> 49:46.000]  Well good, go ahead and file the subject matter jurisdiction as well.
[49:46.000 --> 49:53.000]  So Jeff, did you say that the information requests were ignored?
[49:53.000 --> 50:00.000]  No, we filed them about a week ago, they have five days to respond to them.
[50:00.000 --> 50:03.000]  Are you sure it's not ten?
[50:03.000 --> 50:06.000]  In Georgia it's three.
[50:06.000 --> 50:10.000]  Yeah, in Pennsylvania it's five.
[50:10.000 --> 50:20.000]  So there's only a couple days left in their right to know we'll run out.
[50:20.000 --> 50:29.000]  Well it should get interesting as the prosecutor come and made an offer of a deal to drop this whole thing.
[50:29.000 --> 50:34.000]  They probably won't do that, they'll probably drop it at the hearing.
[50:34.000 --> 50:47.000]  But what my son suggested since he said I believe if we give this current judge the opportunity he'll probably dismiss the thing.
[50:47.000 --> 50:58.000]  Because I think we kind of tore up the other judge a little bit because we never asked or got any notice but it all of a sudden pops up at another district justice the case.
[50:58.000 --> 51:09.000]  I think she had her fill of this thing or else because we got a recognized complaint up at the judicial conduct report they said this is a conflict and they pulled it away from her.
[51:09.000 --> 51:14.000]  I don't know, we're guessing.
[51:14.000 --> 51:18.000]  Well at least it's not going to be an easy ride for them.
[51:18.000 --> 51:29.000]  What particularly there, can you restate where or what type of statute or anything that we could go by or what premise we're going to challenge jurisdiction?
[51:29.000 --> 51:33.000]  You don't know who this judge is.
[51:33.000 --> 51:39.000]  You have notice of who the judge is in the trial and it's not this guy.
[51:39.000 --> 51:45.000]  So you want to see the transfer from the original judge to this judge.
[51:45.000 --> 51:52.000]  If the judge just sent you a notice to appear in his court, he's already told you he don't have jurisdiction.
[51:52.000 --> 51:54.000]  So who are you?
[51:54.000 --> 51:57.000]  Why are you sending me a notice?
[51:57.000 --> 52:03.000]  Okay.
[52:03.000 --> 52:04.000]  All right.
[52:04.000 --> 52:07.000]  Very good.
[52:07.000 --> 52:16.000]  I was building a challenging jurisdiction based on the other court did not respond to a challenger for they've lost jurisdiction.
[52:16.000 --> 52:18.000]  You can't ride a dead horse.
[52:18.000 --> 52:23.000]  Why are you continuing process on something that's already vaguely flawed?
[52:23.000 --> 52:30.000]  In your challenge to this judge, you should include that one.
[52:30.000 --> 52:38.000]  That because the first judge didn't prove up jurisdiction, he doesn't have it and therefore he cannot transfer it to you.
[52:38.000 --> 52:42.000]  If this is the case that came from that judge.
[52:42.000 --> 52:43.000]  Yeah.
[52:43.000 --> 52:44.000]  Right.
[52:44.000 --> 52:45.000]  Okay.
[52:45.000 --> 52:46.000]  Got it.
[52:46.000 --> 52:47.000]  Yeah.
[52:47.000 --> 52:49.000]  So let him tell you that it's the same case.
[52:49.000 --> 52:56.000]  Then you come back with a second subject matter jurisdiction challenge and claim that there was none from the original court.
[52:56.000 --> 52:58.000]  So he can't transfer it to you.
[52:58.000 --> 53:03.000]  I'll let this judge know what he's getting into.
[53:03.000 --> 53:21.000]  Well, since she already received the criminal complaint that she didn't have district attorney's approval and we filed official oppression charges against her, I guess I think you'll probably have an idea what's coming.
[53:21.000 --> 53:27.000]  So she must be low on the totem pole so she gets all the tough ones.
[53:27.000 --> 53:32.000]  Well, have fun and keep us up to date on what happens.
[53:32.000 --> 53:33.000]  All right.
[53:33.000 --> 53:39.000]  When the former apoporus not being responded to now in almost two weeks, what would you recommend there?
[53:39.000 --> 53:40.000]  Okay.
[53:40.000 --> 53:41.000]  Don't say a word.
[53:41.000 --> 53:53.000]  If it's the same as most other states, the only one who has standing to challenge and inform apoporus is the clerk.
[53:53.000 --> 53:57.000]  Because the clerk's the one that gets paid.
[53:57.000 --> 54:01.000]  So she's the only one or he's the only one that has an interest.
[54:01.000 --> 54:13.000]  And if they don't respond within, you know, you look in the statute, there's going to be a statutory time limit on how long anyone has to reject to an inform apoporus.
[54:13.000 --> 54:23.000]  And once that has passed, your former apoporus is granted by the passage of time.
[54:23.000 --> 54:24.000]  Okay.
[54:24.000 --> 54:25.000]  Good.
[54:25.000 --> 54:29.000]  I'll have to look at that and find that time frame.
[54:29.000 --> 54:30.000]  Good.
[54:30.000 --> 54:31.000]  Okay.
[54:31.000 --> 54:32.000]  Well, very good.
[54:32.000 --> 54:33.000]  Thank you.
[54:33.000 --> 54:38.000]  And I do appreciate your own on station and Brett.
[54:38.000 --> 54:43.000]  I know I corresponded with Brett a time or two, appreciate the encouragement and guidance.
[54:43.000 --> 54:45.000]  And this is getting to be fun.
[54:45.000 --> 54:46.000]  It really is.
[54:46.000 --> 54:48.000]  It's a circus.
[54:48.000 --> 54:50.000]  Good.
[54:50.000 --> 54:51.000]  Okay.
[54:51.000 --> 54:52.000]  Thank you, Jeff.
[54:52.000 --> 54:53.000]  Thanks.
[54:53.000 --> 54:54.000]  Okay.
[54:54.000 --> 54:57.000]  Now we're going to Ted in California.
[54:57.000 --> 55:00.000]  Ted, where have you been?
[55:00.000 --> 55:07.000]  I've been COVID-19 isolation.
[55:07.000 --> 55:14.000]  Well, at least you haven't been in jail.
[55:14.000 --> 55:18.000]  Have you had any more hearings?
[55:18.000 --> 55:21.000]  No.
[55:21.000 --> 55:28.000]  Let me, let me give you a quick update on what they've been doing.
[55:28.000 --> 55:37.000]  So this all started February 11th of 2015 has been over 110 hearings.
[55:37.000 --> 55:48.000]  And as we went through all the years, so this year in April, April 6th, I was to go to trial.
[55:48.000 --> 55:57.000]  That day came and I went down there and the bailiff told me I couldn't come in the courthouse.
[55:57.000 --> 56:06.000]  I had a witness got it documented, went back on May 18th because they said a new trial day
[56:06.000 --> 56:10.000]  without having any hearing or anything because of the spires.
[56:10.000 --> 56:14.000]  So I thought online that there was a new date.
[56:14.000 --> 56:20.000]  So I went on May 18th, documented again that bailiff told me I couldn't come in the courthouse.
[56:20.000 --> 56:22.000]  And we left.
[56:22.000 --> 56:29.000]  And I looked online and they said a trial date of June 29th.
[56:29.000 --> 56:31.000]  That's this coming Monday.
[56:31.000 --> 56:38.000]  It's not going to happen because, again, without any court hearing, without any notice to me,
[56:38.000 --> 56:43.000]  they've now kicked the trial date to August 10th.
[56:43.000 --> 56:53.000]  That should get criminal charges of harassment against the judge.
[56:53.000 --> 56:55.000]  Every time.
[56:55.000 --> 56:58.000]  They're erasing the record.
[56:58.000 --> 57:01.000]  You see these dates that I told you?
[57:01.000 --> 57:04.000]  They're no longer on the docket.
[57:04.000 --> 57:07.000]  We get to look at the docket online now.
[57:07.000 --> 57:12.000]  That gets criminal charges against the clerk.
[57:12.000 --> 57:13.000]  Right.
[57:13.000 --> 57:18.000]  And the clerk doesn't feel protected the way the lawyers do and the judges.
[57:18.000 --> 57:21.000]  That's right.
[57:21.000 --> 57:31.000]  So remember, there's lots of moving parts here because they stuck the public defender on me around the end of the year.
[57:31.000 --> 57:36.000]  So around January this year, this public defender claim and he represents me.
[57:36.000 --> 57:48.000]  I think it was December of last year that I filed a lawsuit against this deputy public defender and also named the public defender.
[57:48.000 --> 57:49.000]  Okay.
[57:49.000 --> 57:51.000]  Hang on.
[57:51.000 --> 57:55.000]  The public defender will have to wait till we get back on the other side.
[57:55.000 --> 57:56.000]  Randy Kelton.
[57:56.000 --> 57:57.000]  Press fountain.
[57:57.000 --> 58:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[58:00.000 --> 58:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[58:05.000 --> 58:07.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[58:07.000 --> 58:12.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[58:12.000 --> 58:17.000]  The Michael Maris Proven Method is the most popular method to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[58:17.000 --> 58:22.000]  Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[58:22.000 --> 58:28.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[58:28.000 --> 58:32.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[58:32.000 --> 58:34.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[58:34.000 --> 58:38.000]  Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[58:38.000 --> 58:40.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[58:40.000 --> 58:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com.
[58:49.000 --> 58:59.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[58:59.000 --> 59:00.000]  I love logos.
[59:00.000 --> 59:04.000]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[59:04.000 --> 59:08.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[59:08.000 --> 59:12.000]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[59:12.000 --> 59:19.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[59:19.000 --> 59:21.000]  How can I help logos?
[59:21.000 --> 59:23.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[59:23.000 --> 59:28.000]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[59:28.000 --> 59:30.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[59:30.000 --> 59:34.000]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[59:34.000 --> 59:37.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[59:37.000 --> 59:42.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[59:42.000 --> 59:43.000]  Do I pay extra?
[59:43.000 --> 59:44.000]  No.
[59:44.000 --> 59:46.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[59:46.000 --> 59:47.000]  No.
[59:47.000 --> 59:48.000]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[59:48.000 --> 59:49.000]  No.
[59:49.000 --> 59:50.000]  I mean yes.
[59:50.000 --> 59:55.000]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[59:55.000 --> 59:56.000]  Thank you so much.
[59:56.000 --> 59:57.000]  We are welcome.
[59:57.000 --> 59:59.000]  Happy Holidays Logos.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:36.000]  Well, you ain't gonna fool me with that same old thing again.
[01:00:36.000 --> 01:00:38.000]  I was blindsided.
[01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:40.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:00:40.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, Rue LaRidio and we're talking to Ted in California.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  Okay Ted, we made the prosecutor wait until we got to the other side.
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  Go ahead Ted.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:53.000]  Okay.
[01:00:53.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  That civil law suit is still going on and because all the courts are closed out here,
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  they've kicked the hearings forward.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  Now remember here, I'm suing the deputy district attorney in federal court on a just basically
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  demanding that they prove that they have a valid arrest warrant.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  It's called a right of review.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  So that action is going.
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  Then I have this action in the state court on the public defender and this deputy public
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  defender.
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  And remember Randy, the county council jumped into this and is representing both of these
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  parties in both the federal and the state suit which proves full circle that they're
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  all in the same club.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  And remember the county who is not the employer of the judges, the state pays the judges their
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  full compensation but the county is paying each judge an additional 40 to 60,000 a year.
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:08.000]  They're all in cahoots.
[01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  So where I'm at right now is the Lucy Coe, the federal court judge, she's a bad judge.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  She's a very bad judge.
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  She's so bad she don't even let us come into her court.
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  And she's pulled that on people.
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:32.000]  She's pulled it on me on this case.
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:44.000]  But she didn't know who she's messing with because she went out and canceled my status
[01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  hearing and that was before we had the lockdown out here for the virus just shortly after
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:52.000]  that.
[01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:54.000]  And the way they did it was dirty.
[01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:03.000]  I went to the hearing and that very day the notice of cancellation or continuation of
[01:03:03.000 --> 01:03:07.000]  that hearing arrived at my mailbox.
[01:03:07.000 --> 01:03:09.000]  So it's too late.
[01:03:09.000 --> 01:03:10.000]  I was already there.
[01:03:10.000 --> 01:03:12.000]  So I got turned away.
[01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:13.000]  That made me mad.
[01:03:13.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  But it also woke me up to, you know, Randy, going to all these different courts, a lot
[01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:21.000]  of rules to remember.
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:22.000]  It's different.
[01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:24.000]  You know, you got to shift gears.
[01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  But it woke me up.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:26.000]  So it was a good thing.
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:28.000]  She slapped me upside the face.
[01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  And so remembering how she is.
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:41.000]  And so next we were going to have their hearing to dismiss this, I think.
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:47.000]  And the beauty of that one, I'm talking about the federal case now with the deputy DA.
[01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  And so they put in the county lawyer put in a motion to dismiss and I put in a motion
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  to strike it.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:04:06.000]  And that, and I said that it's hearsay of an attorney and that there was no declaration
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:11.000]  to support it from the guy I'm suing, the deputy DA.
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  So I had him.
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  I had him.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  I still have him.
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  And so that hearing was going to come and she, the judge, she decided to make an order
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:34.000]  that she was going to decide this on the pleadings without a hearing.
[01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  As soon as she made that order, I was down the same day filing.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:43.000]  Well, I filed it through the mail because now all the courts are closed down.
[01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  I filed in the mail a notice of appeal.
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  Now, by doing that, I just took jurisdiction away from her.
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  So you did it in a locatory?
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  No, it doesn't have to be in the fed court.
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  It stops everything the moment you do that.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  And I wish I had it to read to you because it's real simple.
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  Oh, it's beautiful, Randy.
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  So I lined out what she's done and that I was appealing that she made an order denying the status conference.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  And I was appealing that she made an order on her own to not allow a oral argument and personal appearance on our competing motions.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:37.000]  And that was the big one.
[01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  I guess this is the court's version of never letting a good crisis go to waste.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  And during a hundred year pandemic and social unrest, and that there's a knee on my neck, too.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  And I want to process injustice.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  That's what I put in the appeal.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  And that's not a nice circuit court of appeal.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  So it works very effectively.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:12.000]  So that kicks that out.
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  And it's really very simple.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  We're demanding they bring in a warrant for the judge to look at it and see if it's a warrant or not.
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:23.000]  I know it's not a warrant.
[01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  I know it's not a ballot for them in the warrant.
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  So that's that part.
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:28.000]  Now back to the state case.
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  They're trying to pull a fast one.
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  They're going to have a hearing next Thursday.
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  They've demurred my complaint.
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  And they first put the case before Judge Manukian, the most criminal judge who needs to go to prison.
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  He's the one that illegally had me thrown him out of the house by an army.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  Okay, they first put it with him.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:01.000]  They put it in the house by 170.6 and blew him out.
[01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  So what did they do?
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:09.000]  They sent it to the judge that actually took my house away from me.
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:18.000]  And ignored the bankruptcy stay and wouldn't let me come out of default on the quiet title lawsuit.
[01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  And there's no such thing as a default in California when it comes to real property.
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  They say she's now going to hear my suit.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:34.000]  And so I got several things I figured to do to her.
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  One, I'm going to file a motion of recuse for cause, a 170.3, recusal for cause,
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  and explain some of the things I just said.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  Plus that she is a witness in my criminal case.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  I plan to call her.
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  And I'll put my subpoena in there as exhibit A in that recusal.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  Now, then I also, because the counties come in and claims they're representing the public offenders office,
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:09.000]  well, I don't want to hurt in this county.
[01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  I want it to go to a neutral county.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:15.000]  And so that's kind of where that's at.
[01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  What are the venue rules in California?
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:30.000]  So in Texas, the rules are if you can get three people to sign an affidavit stating that you can't get a fair hearing in this county,
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  then you have a right to change the venue.
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  Do you know what the rules are in California?
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:37.000]  I think they're similar.
[01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  And thank you.
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:42.000]  That's exactly what I need to do.
[01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  But I also have another way, but it's a lot more work.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  And I won't get into it on this call, but that's a very good way of doing it.
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  And we do have a similar situation here.
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  You know, Texas and California laws are very similar.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  You know, that does bring up a question when you're trying to find the reciprocal law here in California to say, you know, Texas or Kansas.
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  How do you go about doing that?
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  We have found, I don't know where it's at now, but there are websites that have lists of all of these laws and they cross-reference them to other states.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  You just have to search that out on the web.
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:35.000]  Brett, do you know what that's called?
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  That sounds useful.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:42.000]  There's a name for it, and it's not coming to mind.
[01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  What I had to do is look for phrases that are in the Texas law and then go, hey, I'm looking for Colorado.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  I'm looking for Kansas and then put that sitting phrase in and I find something that way.
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  But I've never seen something that sounds really useful to have it all laid out in a nice chart.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  Yeah, I've seen it before.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  Don't remember where it's at.
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  But when you're searching for cross-references this way,
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  put a statute from the state that you're in and then put in, say you're looking for a California representation of a Texas statute.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  Put in the Texas statute and then put California in there a couple of times.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  If you just put it in once, you don't always get it.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  Sometimes you put it in two or three times.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  Then you're trying to get a California case that references this statute.
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  Or when you're looking for case law, you can do the same thing.
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  I'm pretty good at doing searches and that helps me and I'll use that.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  I'm pretty sure it'll bring stuff up.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  Or you could also try, if you can't find it, if you know something.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  Sorry, soft drink lovers.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  Even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:55.000]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners triggered the appetite,
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight,
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:23.000]  and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:25.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht.
[01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives,
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  and thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:54.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:00.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  This program with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  and ordering your copy today.
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:45.000]  The Law vs. the Lie,
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:47.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  hundreds of research documents and further useful resource material.
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  By ordering your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  Looking for some truth?
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  You found it.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:25.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  I survived that dive off the cliff there,
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  at least until Deborah finds out about it.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  Okay, Ted, where were we?
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  Well, we just finished up with the cross-reference
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:12.000]  and I went on to talk about a little bit more about the case now.
[01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:14.000]  Okay, wait, wait, hold on there.
[01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  Glad you brought me back because there's one thing I wanted to mention.
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:20.000]  Is good faith in credit.
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  Are you familiar with the good faith in credit doctrine?
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  Not right at the moment.
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  Okay, here's the good faith in credit doctrine.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  All of the legislators of all of the states have declared
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:42.000]  that they trust the legislators of other states.
[01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  So if one state has addressed an issue that another state has not addressed
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:51.000]  under full faith in credit,
[01:15:51.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  you can pull that foreign statute into this state as an advisory statute.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  So it doesn't have precisely the effect of law,
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:07.000]  but it's enough that the court can use it.
[01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:11.000]  So if you find a really good statute in another state,
[01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  for instance, in Texas, we have a statute that's very similar to any other state.
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:24.000]  If you commit simple assault while you're prominently displaying a deadly weapon,
[01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  that's aggravated assault.
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  But in Texas, if you commit simple assault while prominently displaying a deadly weapon,
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  and you are a public official acting under the color or pretense of an official capacity,
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  that's a felony of the first degree.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  I've never seen that in any other state, but in California you could say,
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:57.000]  this is a very serious issue.
[01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  It is an issue the state of California legislature has not addressed,
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:03.000]  but the state of Texas has.
[01:17:03.000 --> 01:17:11.000]  And this officer committed simple assault while prominently displaying a deadly weapon.
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:16.000]  If I committed simple assault against an officer while prominently displaying a deadly weapon,
[01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:19.000]  they'd call that first degree felony aggravated assault.
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  And in Texas, they put a great responsibility on a police officer
[01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:33.000]  when he strapped that pistol on his hip and California should put the same restriction.
[01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  That's full faith and credit. That's how you bring it in.
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Does that make sense?
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:41.000]  Yes.
[01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  Something to consider when you find some really cool stuff.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  Part of where I've been, I spent over a month writing papers because of this virus
[01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:01.000]  to get this lady out of jail.
[01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  She's pre-trial and they put a $2 million bail on her,
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:10.000]  which is absolutely absurd while they're letting everybody else go.
[01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  So I was busy doing that and I only told you that part because I was able,
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:28.000]  all the courts are closed, so I was able to file this electronically.
[01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:36.000]  And I was able to get past all their fees and all their setup.
[01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:42.000]  So now I electronically file and the beauty of electronically filing,
[01:18:42.000 --> 01:18:47.000]  the other side is served electronically.
[01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  And there's one other beautiful thing about electronic filing.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:57.000]  I really like it. It leaves indulable traces.
[01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  Exactly.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  You're the government.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:06.000]  You can erase all of your computers, but you can't erase mine.
[01:19:06.000 --> 01:19:10.000]  And you can't erase all the servers in between me and you.
[01:19:10.000 --> 01:19:14.000]  It leaves traces you cannot erase.
[01:19:14.000 --> 01:19:18.000]  Well, this is beautiful for those reasons.
[01:19:18.000 --> 01:19:24.000]  And so it goes in, the court clerk then reviews it.
[01:19:24.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  When they accept it, they stamp it and send it back to you for you to download
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  and print your stamped file, court stamped copy.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  But the other thing is they think I'm a lawyer.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:42.000]  And you know what?
[01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  My job has gotten a whole lot easier now that they think I'm a lawyer.
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  So what made them think you were a lawyer?
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  My papers look good.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  Yes, that's what I was hoping.
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  They just assumed so they didn't raise a question.
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:03.000]  Perfect.
[01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  No, and I know how to talk to them.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  Even in filing electronically, you can put memos in there.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:20.000]  So I filed everything and I was surprised that they put the court hearing date
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  out to July 6th on a regular schedule.
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:31.000]  And they're not supposed to do that with these virus motions.
[01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  Okay, we're asking for, you know, to let her out of jail.
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  And so anyway, I got it back within a couple hours.
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  It's accepted.
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  They put the date and time in the courtroom in there.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:47.000]  It was beautiful.
[01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  And I did, I slept on it.
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:57.000]  And the next morning I'd been quarantined for at least five days on just, you know,
[01:20:57.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  trying to get that final stuff put together and get it in.
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  And I wanted to go out, you know, get some food and stuff, but I said no.
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  I sat down and I wrote a motion to shorten time.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  And again, electronically filed it, didn't pay any of their fees or nothing,
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  and put a note to clerk that this needed to get to a judge right now.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  And I put it as an ex parte, I titled it ex parte, motion to shorten time.
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  And did it a lot faster than I thought I would.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  And actually still had time to get out of here and go get some supplies.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  So I come back, it's approved, and the hearing was today.
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:50.000]  Wow.
[01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  So how'd the hearing go?
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  Well, you know, again, because everything's locked down, I'm not hearing stuff directly.
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  I'm hearing it third party.
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  The judge wants to know who wrote these papers.
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  And of course, the lady in jail said, they're my papers.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  I gave instruction.
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  So he said, well, we're going to come back on Monday.
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  So they're coming back on Monday.
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  The bottom line in those papers, I explained to them that first off,
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  I wrote a motion, notice of motion and motion, and I put two exhibits.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  Exhibit A is a six page investigative news report of the jail and its conditions,
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:47.000]  and quotes from three inmates.
[01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  It's not good.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  The second report is a woman that they ignored,
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  and she ended up giving birth to her own baby in the jail cell.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  Not real good.
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  And then there's a federal case where a doctor that worked for the state or several states,
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:23.000]  he wrote a 20 page declaration explaining that half the people in jail need to get out now.
[01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:33.000]  And so that was filed in federal court, so I put it in as mandatory, judicially noticed evidence and support of motion to release her.
[01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  Then I put in her declaration as well.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  So let me suggest one other thing that you may not have considered.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  First, let me give you some statistics.
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  2017, the state of Texas spent $3.4 billion on the jail system.
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:05.000]  700 million, I'm sorry, 1.4 million of that was for pretrial detention.
[01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  1.4 million.
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  These are people who have not been convicted of a crime.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  Almost half of the entire budget was for people who have not been convicted of a crime.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:26.000]  This is costing the state a horrible fortune.
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  California is much worse than Texas.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  Hang on.
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  Going to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rula La Radio.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  We've still got another hour and 15 minutes.
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  We've got a couple of calls.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  We do have an empty spot on the board.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  If you have a question or a comment, give us a call.
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:48.000]  We'll be taking your calls all night.
[01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:56.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:24:56.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  And I didn't fall off the cliff.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:04.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  except in the area of nutrition.
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:11.000]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  The primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  most of which we reject.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:44.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:47.000]  as you help support quality radio.
[01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  and increase your income. Order now.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:10.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:26:10.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:38.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  prosay tactics, and much more.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:27:00.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio on this Friday, the 26th day of June, 2020.
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:46.000]  Another year half gone.
[01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  My mom warned me about this, that every year it'll seem to go faster.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  And I told her, if this keeps up, I'm going to get a speeding ticket.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  Okay, we're talking to Ted in California.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:07.000]  Okay, go ahead, Ted.
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  So back to my case regarding this public defender, you know, I already did the bar complaints
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  and they basically denied it.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:30.000]  So I want to, I'm about to file with the California Supreme Court a complaint against this public defender.
[01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  Have you talked to Tina?
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:38.000]  Yes, she already sent me her papers and we're going to use that as a starting point.
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  We're going to simplify it.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  We're going to make it a lot simpler.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  But we just, we want to get that complaint in there.
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  And as far as this lady that they won't let out, you know, what I want to come back with is a habeas right after this.
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  And I was going to just, I don't know, now maybe not, but I was going to first file the habeas right in that court and then take it to the appellate court.
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  But based on all that I just put in there, I just...
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  Did I lose you, Ted?
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  Okay, Ted, if you can hear us, then go ahead and hang up and call right back.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  Because Scott's next, I'll take Scott, if you call back in, then I'll just leave Scott open.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  I'll take your call back, but we can't hear you at all.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  So I'm going to go to...
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  I got you now.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Oh, got you back.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  All right.
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  So she's pre-trial, and I think her case is over.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  She's been sitting there for six months.
[01:29:58.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  They haven't even taken her to a preliminary hearing, which she's entitled to within 10 days.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  And the reason I mentioned that, what it costs in the States, because generally the county has to pay this.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:24.000]  And the county commissioner's courts, that's a big deal for them, that's their biggest single budget item, is pre-trial detention.
[01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  You put something like that in so that you give the judge a political reason for getting rid of a hot potato.
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  If this looks like it's going to become politically a problem, you just need to give him a plausible reason why he can do this.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:47.000]  You know what I say?
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  Never back a bulldog in a corner unless you give him a way out.
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  So you drop all this ugly stuff on them and then give them something they can use to get out of this spot and not appear as though they gave ground.
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  That makes sense, Ted.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  Yes, and they have more than enough reason with the virus and what I wrote in the papers, but I also put in the papers that they are liable.
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:33.000]  And I cited California's, I'm sorry, United States Supreme Court cases where one prisoner had them all because his cellmate was smoking five packs of cigarette today.
[01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  And that's all it took based on that he may get a condition in the future.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  And they ruled that they're all liable.
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  And so they're personally liable.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  So I think they've got more than enough motivation.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  Good, good.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  You know, on that issue, you know, there is no justice.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  My wife smoked for 30 years and I've never smoked.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  The statistics say I more likely die from it than she is.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  There is no justice.
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  She got a hysterectomy 20 years ago.
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  She still gets PMS.
[01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:16.000]  There is no justice.
[01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:20.000]  And I only told that because she's not listening.
[01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:23.000]  Yeah, well, you forget one thing.
[01:32:23.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  You upload these.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  She never thought that was as funny as I did.
[01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  Okay.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:34.000]  I know you got some other calls.
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  I want to let you go.
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:36.000]  Okay.
[01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:37.000]  Thank you, Ted.
[01:32:37.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  And don't be a stranger and send me an email.
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  I want to talk to you offline.
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:43.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:32:43.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  And thank you, Brett, as well.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  Okay.
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:48.000]  Thank you, Ted.
[01:32:48.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  Okay, now we're going to go to Scott in Texas.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:54.000]  Hello, Scott.
[01:32:54.000 --> 01:33:00.000]  Before you start, there's something we want your comment on.
[01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:06.000]  Brett, will you address what's going on in Tarrant County?
[01:33:06.000 --> 01:33:07.000]  Well, sure.
[01:33:07.000 --> 01:33:11.000]  I imagine that's probably what Scott was going to bring up.
[01:33:11.000 --> 01:33:19.000]  But in Texas, our governor Abbott has put out a couple more executive orders.
[01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:25.000]  That one about the 100 person gathering,
[01:33:25.000 --> 01:33:33.000]  giving local judges the flexibility to add kind of a vague little extra thing.
[01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:36.000]  They can add additional restrictions.
[01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:47.000]  And another one is Order 28 where he said,
[01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  the local businesses, he says that the local judges are able to put restrictions
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  on local businesses.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  So it's kind of an end run around the concept that they can't tell us,
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  we the people, what to do and put a fine and a penalty attached to it and make it
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  final, but they're allowing the locals to press on the businesses and force the
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  businesses to force the customers to do with the wearing of the mask or whatever
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  safety guidelines and guidance and all of that.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  And Tarrant County took it up right away.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  Yesterday they issued something.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  Today, Collieville, a city in Tarrant County,
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  Collieville Mayor made an announcement and said,
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  we're not going to enforce that.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  If the government can't make that restriction on the people,
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:56.000]  we're certainly not going to.
[01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  That puts the businesses in an unfair position of law enforcement.
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  Very good for Collieville, I'm surprised.
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  Collieville is a relatively small community that got engulfed by the metro
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  place.
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:18.000]  It's nice to see them standing up doing the right thing for the right reason.
[01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  I've said from the beginning that this infringes on First Amendment.
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  And there was a way to do this that did not infringe on First Amendment.
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  But it was easier just to put this rule out there.
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  They could have said that in this time of crisis where harm to others can
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:54.000]  reasonably occur if you are in cautious.
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  If it can be shown that you acted in violation of these recommendations,
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  these safety recommendations, and it can be shown that you caused other people
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:13.000]  to contract this disease, you can be charged with reckless endangerment.
[01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  Now, they could have done that.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  But that was more difficult.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  It was easier just to issue an order.
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:26.000]  Well, if they issue an order, now, frankly, they have the authority to issue
[01:36:26.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  that order.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  But they don't necessarily have the authority to enforce it.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:37.000]  But if they do issue that unconstitutional order and you're harmed
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  thereby, then the entity that issued the order is responsible to reimburse you
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:49.000]  for your harm.
[01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  Had they used the other approach, they would have not have put the
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  jurisdiction at legal jeopardy.
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  But they chose the easy way.
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  There was a way to do this under constitution.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  They just chose not to.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:12.000]  What do you think, Brett, of Scott?
[01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  Well, a funny thing.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  I called to order me a pizza today from the Pizza Patron here in Garland,
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  Texas, ordered that sucker, went down to go pick it up because I was just
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  going to pick it up and come back and bring it back to the house.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  And because I wasn't wearing a mask, they wouldn't let me walk in there for
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  10 seconds and give my pizza.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:41.000]  So I said, that's not a law.
[01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  It don't matter.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  You got to have a mask.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  I said, well, you don't have to have a mask.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:49.000]  We're not going to give you service.
[01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:51.000]  I said, that's fine.
[01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  You eat the pizza.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  I'll make a complaint.
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  And walked out.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  And now this is not just First Amendment.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:06.000]  This is actually going to be classified something more like,
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  I just had it on the tip of my tongue too, kind of like a harassment.
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  No, you can't get there.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  If I own a business and you want to patronize my business,
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:30.000]  in a way that's, in a way that I don't want to do business,
[01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  I don't have to do business for you.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  And it's not discrimination if I make this rule that applies to
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  everyone.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  I can't say I won't sell a pizza to any black guy or any chink
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  or wetback Mexican, but I will to white guys.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  That would be unconstitutional.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  But if I say I won't sell pieces to anybody who doesn't have a mask on,
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:00.000]  that's not discrimination.
[01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  And that's within the proprietor's rights.
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  But then it's within your rights to file a complaint with a better
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  business bureau and recommend to do a video about it and post it on
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  YouTube.
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  And they get to suffer consequences.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:22.000]  But as far as YouTube.
[01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  Yeah, you could go get them to beat you up and pull you through your window.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  Well, all I could get them to do was not let me in and throw a pizza at me.
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  So that couldn't even get that.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:42.000]  Yeah, it would have seemed they could have brought you the pizza outside.
[01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  I mean.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:49.000]  Well, this is not the first time, though, to eat pies.
[01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:53.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[01:39:53.000 --> 01:39:57.000]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text.
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  But in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:17.000]  But the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:43.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  That's freestudybible.com.