ROL_2020-02-17_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.900]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star of Lowdown.
[00:06.900 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.520]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.520 --> 00:29.820]  $62.47 a barrel, and crypto as an order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.820 --> 00:41.600]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.600 --> 00:52.560]  In history, the year 1916, the Prepared as Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.560 --> 00:57.880]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Prepared as Day Parade, killing
[00:57.880 --> 01:04.880]  10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:04.880 --> 01:09.560]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing HEP into
[01:09.560 --> 01:14.360]  Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin,
[01:14.360 --> 01:18.200]  and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:18.200 --> 01:22.840]  new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment
[01:22.840 --> 01:24.840]  to test the herb for THC.
[01:24.840 --> 01:28.560]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:28.560 --> 01:33.160]  she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.160 --> 01:34.160]  law.
[01:34.160 --> 01:37.720]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:37.720 --> 01:42.200]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.200 --> 01:48.400]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.400 --> 01:51.360]  well as other cities too, like the district attorney.
[01:51.360 --> 01:57.400]  In El Paso, Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law quote
[01:57.400 --> 02:02.000]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:02.000 --> 02:06.880]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.880 --> 02:10.880]  in Harris County, who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.880 --> 02:13.600]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.600 --> 02:17.480]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.480 --> 02:22.720]  charged with.
[02:22.720 --> 02:27.560]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark.
[02:27.560 --> 02:32.480]  As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.480 --> 02:38.120]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.120 --> 02:39.620]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.620 --> 02:43.920]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:43.920 --> 02:50.200]  its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.200 --> 03:15.200]  clove.
[03:15.200 --> 03:18.600]  The cops, this is what happens when you call them the cops
[03:18.600 --> 03:21.000]  This is what happens when you call them the cops
[03:21.000 --> 03:23.600]  You get your rights violated or you all get shot
[03:23.600 --> 03:26.000]  I think that people being victimized by criminal cops
[03:26.000 --> 03:28.600]  Psychopathic predators, terrorizing neighbors with glass
[03:28.600 --> 03:31.200]  Equipped with pepper spray, mate, cups, tazers and glass
[03:31.200 --> 03:33.800]  They like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts
[03:33.800 --> 03:36.400]  Forget what you taught, the cops have got a license to kill
[03:36.400 --> 03:39.000]  Witness intimidation means that they can use it at will
[03:39.000 --> 03:41.600]  Cold asylum keys that the pigs will never let out a squeal
[03:41.600 --> 03:44.200]  And if they go to court, they know the judge will make them a deal
[03:44.200 --> 03:46.800]  That's why they stopin' me, lockin' me up and stopin' me
[03:46.800 --> 03:49.400]  Conversatin' my property, talkin' in my demography
[03:49.400 --> 03:52.000]  Makin' the poor commodity, profitin' off of poverty
[03:52.000 --> 03:54.400]  In court, the policy support, the prison economy
[03:54.400 --> 03:56.800]  Yeah, no one makes money when the violence stops
[03:56.800 --> 03:59.400]  Hatin' brutality, it's a way to make the criminal cry
[03:59.400 --> 04:02.000]  Blood in the gutters, how to risk whether they bread at the top
[04:02.000 --> 04:04.400]  That's why this is what happens when you call the cops
[04:04.400 --> 04:07.000]  No, this is what happens when you call the cops
[04:07.000 --> 04:11.000]  Alright folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show
[04:11.000 --> 04:13.000]  with your host Eddie Craig
[04:13.000 --> 04:18.000]  It is February 17th, 2020
[04:18.000 --> 04:19.800]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[04:19.800 --> 04:25.800]  Just a quick FYI, I am liable to be off of the radio for a couple of weeks
[04:25.800 --> 04:32.800]  I am going to go on a trip to look at a potential project to be done
[04:32.800 --> 04:38.800]  And so I will probably be gone a couple of Mondays out of town here in Austin
[04:38.800 --> 04:43.000]  And so I won't be on and I'll make sure that everything's covered
[04:43.000 --> 04:45.000]  But don't worry about me, I'm okay
[04:45.000 --> 04:49.000]  There's just something that's come up that's given me an opportunity to go try something out
[04:49.000 --> 04:52.000]  And I think I want to give it a shot
[04:52.000 --> 04:55.000]  At least for a couple of weeks to see what's up with what
[04:55.000 --> 04:59.800]  Now that said, there is something I want to talk about tonight
[04:59.800 --> 05:05.000]  I am going to go ahead and turn on the phone bridge so that y'all can call in and get in line if you want to
[05:05.000 --> 05:08.000]  But it's going to be a little bit before I get to you, so just be aware of that
[05:08.000 --> 05:11.000]  So if you don't want to call in right away, that's fine
[05:11.000 --> 05:15.000]  But this is something I think we need to start considering
[05:15.000 --> 05:24.000]  Now, we all know that we have certain kinds of people in our society that most folks consider to be of questionable character
[05:24.000 --> 05:27.000]  Or just outright criminals
[05:27.000 --> 05:33.000]  I mean, there are lots of people in my hometown when I worked the jail as a deputy
[05:33.000 --> 05:37.000]  That I grew up with that were in that jail
[05:37.000 --> 05:42.000]  They had been arrested, they deserved to be there, things they were doing weren't right
[05:42.000 --> 05:50.000]  One of the guys who when I was a kid was one of my best friends was in there for stealing, riding and pushing lawn mowers
[05:50.000 --> 05:57.000]  And other household goods from people's garages and stuff like that
[05:57.000 --> 06:01.000]  A couple others were in there because they were caught dealing drugs
[06:01.000 --> 06:07.000]  A couple others because they'd gotten to shoot out with each other dealing drugs, etc, etc, etc
[06:07.000 --> 06:12.000]  And it's just one of those things where in a small town where you know almost everybody
[06:12.000 --> 06:19.000]  You're eventually going to run across something like that if everybody doesn't maintain the status quo
[06:19.000 --> 06:24.000]  So everybody knows some, whether they spend any time with them anymore as adults is a whole different issue
[06:24.000 --> 06:30.000]  But everybody has known folks at one point or another that were good and then suddenly they weren't so good
[06:30.000 --> 06:43.000]  And when you know that those kind of people are around and that your kids or your friends or people that you care about are spending time with them
[06:43.000 --> 06:48.000]  You're naturally concerned about them and you try to warn them off about it and you hope that they listen
[06:48.000 --> 07:01.000]  But the stigma of what the other person is doing, has done or is potentially going to be doing again is going to naturally attach to whomever they're associating with
[07:01.000 --> 07:04.000]  Including the people that you're trying to protect
[07:04.000 --> 07:14.000]  Now, because there's a potential for that social stigma, people will start to look at the people you care about differently
[07:14.000 --> 07:19.000]  And they become aware that they're spending their time with this kind of person
[07:19.000 --> 07:25.000]  And that they're liable to be found more often than not in the company of just such a person
[07:25.000 --> 07:35.000]  So society begins to look at the person you care about to be no different than the one you're trying to warn them away from
[07:35.000 --> 07:39.000]  Right? I mean, common sense
[07:39.000 --> 07:55.000]  So why is it that that is the exact opposite of how society, the public in general, not to mention the ones they work with and for
[07:55.000 --> 08:03.000]  Why is it that that is the exact opposite of how things work when it comes to cops?
[08:03.000 --> 08:17.000]  Let's face reality here, folks. The courts and the government are dead set on protecting cops, calling them more of them are good than there are bad and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah
[08:17.000 --> 08:27.000]  How do you determine that? On what factual evidence are you making the determination that there are more good cops than bad cops?
[08:27.000 --> 08:44.000]  I mean, let's look at the facts here. Most of the cops who turn out to be criminals of the worst order are often the most praised and the most highly decorated officers in their departments
[08:44.000 --> 08:52.000]  Everybody thought they were the good guy until they weren't
[08:52.000 --> 09:06.000]  And yet nobody thinks that the cops that have worked with him, around him, are in any way stigmatized or attached to the wrongdoing that this one cop who finally got caught has been involved in
[09:06.000 --> 09:09.000]  Why is that?
[09:09.000 --> 09:28.000]  Why do people look at police and inherently think this is a good guy? When we have story after story after story after story after story after personal experience with exactly the opposite
[09:28.000 --> 09:44.000]  I will tell you that from personal experience, it doesn't matter how nice I am, doesn't matter how congenial I try to carry on a conversation with them, if I am speaking in a manner adverse to the things the cop wants someone to accept as true
[09:44.000 --> 09:54.000]  or to give him a greater authority than he actually has under law, that cop turns into a rabid dog
[09:54.000 --> 10:10.000]  I mean, it's simple. There's no in between. They're either cordial as long as they're not being challenged or they're completely foaming at the mouth if they are. Why?
[10:10.000 --> 10:24.000]  Are we supposed to be able to tell the difference in a good cop or a bad cop when even those in their own department and who decorate them and who praise them can't seem to do it?
[10:24.000 --> 10:51.000]  There are only two possibilities here. They honestly didn't know, which would be extremely hard to believe unless they're absolutely not doing everything they're telling the public that they're doing to do background checks, to monitor what their people do, how their people do it, and they're supervising them and trading them properly.
[10:51.000 --> 11:03.000]  That scenario of blindly not knowing they were doing it should not occur if that's the case.
[11:03.000 --> 11:31.000]  The other one is they're just as guilty either by avoiding it intentionally, ignoring it intentionally, or some sort of peripheral, I don't know, assistance cover up or involvement to a greater degree.
[11:31.000 --> 11:49.000]  If I hung out with a bunch of convicted felons that were still acting as convicted felons, I would get the stigma of being presumed to be someone who should be punished just like the convicted felons, but not the cops.
[11:49.000 --> 12:14.000]  Why? Why the double standard? Why does the government, the courts, their departments, their federal officers go out of their way to paint a provenly corrupt cop as a good guy?
[12:14.000 --> 12:20.000]  I'm having a hard time with that. And let me give you a perfect example.
[12:20.000 --> 12:41.000]  As of yesterday, there was a state trooper in Louisiana, 20 years in law enforcement, 18 as a state trooper in Louisiana, who was just arrested for operating and producing his own child pornography ring.
[12:41.000 --> 13:00.000]  Now, don't get me wrong on how simple this was. He wasn't just distributing child pornography. He was producing child pornography and then distributing child pornography.
[13:00.000 --> 13:12.000]  Now, this is a trooper that is married with three kids. As of right now, we don't have any details as to whether or not any of the child pornography he was disseminating involved his own children.
[13:12.000 --> 13:33.000]  But they involve someone's, somebody's. Now, cops are known to be a tight-knit group. They don't socialize with non-cops beyond a family requirement on most cases.
[13:33.000 --> 13:49.000]  Their cops are friends, cops are friends with cops, okay, and other forms of law enforcement. So who then was the supplier of the children to this cop?
[13:49.000 --> 14:05.000]  Was he his own recruiter? Was he going to the local playgrounds on his own, the local schools on his own, and rounding up the kids he was using to produce these materials that he was disseminating?
[14:05.000 --> 14:11.000]  Or was someone recruiting for him and with him?
[14:11.000 --> 14:23.000]  Don't have any information on that either. Well, in the bet, we don't. If he doesn't name names, neither is anyone else going to unless they too get caught red-handed.
[14:23.000 --> 14:30.000]  And even then, it has to depend on who that's going to be as to how far into the rug it's going to get swept.
[14:30.000 --> 14:56.000]  Let me ask you a question. How do you spend 18 years in law enforcement around a bunch of other law enforcement officers, some of which I am sure spend time in your home with you and your family, and not a single one of them have a clue that this is who you really are?
[14:56.000 --> 15:13.000]  And yet these are the people that are investigating criminal conduct by everyone else with absolutely no personal acquaintance with them, but you can trust that they have the evidence and everything correct in those cases.
[15:13.000 --> 15:22.000]  They just can't seem to figure out that one of their own is guilty of some much more heinous crime.
[15:22.000 --> 15:41.000]  And yet they are trusted to solve these crimes and to point their fingers at the correct person and not tamper with the evidence to ensure that their finger pointing gets results.
[15:41.000 --> 15:56.000]  There is a severe credibility problem in law enforcement when it comes to anybody in the public that is in the know about how things are actually working.
[15:56.000 --> 16:11.000]  Yet no credibility problem seems to exist within the hierarchies of government when it comes to cops. Why? How?
[16:11.000 --> 16:36.000]  How can a cop be trusted to accuse someone else of a crime when you have dozens upon dozens upon dozens of times where it has been shown that cops have lied under oath, tampered with evidence, planted evidence, fabricated evidence, tampered with witnesses,
[16:36.000 --> 16:45.000]  just to ensure that their finger pointing got a conviction?
[16:45.000 --> 16:57.000]  And yet the courts don't seem to have a problem with an officer's credibility and testifying against someone about anything. Why?
[16:57.000 --> 17:04.000]  Y'all hang on just a second and we'll talk a little bit more about this and we'll get back.
[17:04.000 --> 17:11.000]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[17:11.000 --> 17:18.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated. Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[17:18.000 --> 17:27.000]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:27.000 --> 17:30.000]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:30.000 --> 17:39.000]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:39.000 --> 17:48.000]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[17:48.000 --> 17:55.000]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:55.000 --> 18:00.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:15.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meara's Proven Method. Michael Meara says won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons. How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:41.000]  The Michael Meara's Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:51.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meara spanner or email Michael Meara's at yahoo.com.
[18:51.000 --> 19:12.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:12.000 --> 19:38.000]  Alright folks, this is rule of law radio. The call in number 512-646-1984 if you want to call in and get up on the caller board.
[19:38.000 --> 19:53.000]  Okay, now the thing is is this cop who's by the way his name is Jason Boyette two years ago in 2018 was elected Louisiana State Trooper of the Year.
[19:53.000 --> 20:15.000]  Elected by his fellow officers as State Trooper of the Year. Now here in 2011 there was another officer in the Fort Pierce Police Department Michael Edwin Harding who was also elected
[20:15.000 --> 20:30.000]  Trooper of the Year or Policeman of the Year or Officer of the Year or whatever and that cop was just sentenced to life in prison for child exploitation.
[20:30.000 --> 20:49.000]  Now these are two cops who were made Officer or Trooper of the Year by their peers who were convicted of these kinds of crimes.
[20:49.000 --> 21:07.000]  And no one noticed. No one had a clue. If the police department cannot determine through observational means.
[21:07.000 --> 21:21.000]  Such problems existing within their own department around people with whom they rub elbows, some of them on a daily if not hourly basis.
[21:21.000 --> 21:40.000]  Yet they're going to go out into the middle of millions of people and on an instance notice decide they're committing a crime. They're a criminal just by the way they're looking at me just by the way their hands are shaking just by the way they're acting nervous just by the way they're talking just by the way they're
[21:40.000 --> 21:54.000]  smelling just by the way they won't look me in the eye blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. It's a joke.
[21:54.000 --> 22:01.000]  And it's being played on us.
[22:01.000 --> 22:25.000]  They don't know what they're seeing and what they're doing any more than Joe average does. They simply are being given leeway by the very government that is supposed to protect us from these kinds of things and these kinds of people ever getting their hands on this kind of power.
[22:25.000 --> 22:33.000]  And you wonder why America is going downhill so fast. It's ridiculous folks.
[22:33.000 --> 22:45.000]  We can't get ahead because we're always having to look over our shoulder to see why we're getting stopped why we're getting pulled over even though we're not doing anything to anybody.
[22:45.000 --> 23:01.000]  And it's because some amount of electricity is not going into a light bulb the way it should which we may or may not even know is an issue because we have a little square piece of plastic either on a plate or in our window.
[23:01.000 --> 23:12.000]  That's got the wrong number on it or it's the wrong color and we have to worry about getting pulled over arrested and killed.
[23:12.000 --> 23:21.000]  And here you have a state trooper who has been publishing his own child pornography for God knows how long.
[23:21.000 --> 23:29.000]  And when they raid his house they do it calmly, peaceably. They do it without drawn guns.
[23:29.000 --> 23:41.000]  They even questioned him face to face and let him go before they charged him and then raided his home again.
[23:41.000 --> 23:46.000]  Had that been you and me we probably would have never walked out of that house alive.
[23:46.000 --> 23:52.000]  Whether we were armed or not would be completely irrelevant.
[23:52.000 --> 24:02.000]  Because even if we weren't by the time the cops got through writing up their report and shooting enough guns around inside they just simply say we were.
[24:02.000 --> 24:31.000]  After all it worked with Acevedo's crew in Houston didn't it. It took a private shooting investigator to prove that the Houston crime lab for its police department was intentionally hiding the factual evidence about who shot who and that raid that killed that man and woman in their home.
[24:31.000 --> 24:45.000]  The cops were the only ones who shot anybody or anything including each other.
[24:45.000 --> 25:05.000]  The couple never fired a shot at anyone. Not a single bullet found in the walls of that house or any other part of it matched any gun belonging to the couple.
[25:05.000 --> 25:25.000]  And yet we have to take their word for it. In fact Acevedo our ex-chief is still insisting that his criminal cops are the good guys, that they did a good thing by murdering two innocent people.
[25:25.000 --> 25:49.000]  And these are the kinds of individuals that are being let loose amongst us to keep us straight and off the criminal line. Give me a break.
[25:55.000 --> 26:11.000]  That's like putting a known alcoholic in charge of a brewery and a halfway house at the same time.
[26:11.000 --> 26:29.000]  Where are our brains people? That we think this is an acceptable arrangement. What are we thinking when we say and do nothing about this arrangement?
[26:29.000 --> 26:52.000]  When we just let it go because that's how it is. Your entire country is being rewired to work in a completely different fashion other than that mandated by the Constitution and the majority of the people either don't care or don't know.
[26:52.000 --> 27:14.000]  Or they do know and still don't care because so far it hasn't landed squarely on their doorstep. But they're going to be screaming loud enough when it does, but who is going to be left to help them?
[27:14.000 --> 27:27.000]  Why are we allowing our country to be taken over by the very people whose hands it was never intended to be in in the first place?
[27:27.000 --> 27:37.000]  Let's look at how the courts are handling this. Everything that comes down to a case involving police officers is all about the immunity.
[27:37.000 --> 27:44.000]  How can we spend the tale of the facts to let immunity come into effect for this officer?
[27:44.000 --> 27:59.000]  By the way, the courts created the immunity doctrine. It's not written into any law. It's not even written into any theory of law beyond that cooked up by the courts.
[27:59.000 --> 28:21.000]  See, the courts supposedly are forbidden to determine a legal fact in relation to a crime. The courts are supposed to be neutral. The fact finding is supposed to be something done by a jury.
[28:21.000 --> 28:31.000]  If there's a fact issue in a case, then that is something for a jury to decide, not a court.
[28:31.000 --> 28:57.000]  The courts have no business saying this officer cannot be sued because of qualified immunity. Because whether or not his actions qualified him under his duties to be protected from prosecution or suit is a question for a jury.
[28:57.000 --> 29:18.000]  Because the reason he's being sued is that he did something to violate the rights of someone else, which is always a question for a jury, not a judge.
[29:18.000 --> 29:42.000]  Yet the courts protect them. And then the courts declare that this is how all law functions. See, the law is not the law according to the attorneys and the courts themselves until the courts haven't had an opportunity to rule upon what that law means.
[29:42.000 --> 30:02.000]  You get that? The law is not the law unless the court says that's what it means. Y'all hang on and we'll be right back after this break and we'll go from there.
[30:02.000 --> 30:15.000]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under the blood alcohol limit. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers and a government cover-up in a moment.
[30:32.000 --> 30:44.000]  It's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.000 --> 31:00.000]  Ever hear the term fine farming? It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and it's apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida. This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[31:00.000 --> 31:14.000]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. State officials knew about it for two and a half years but did nothing. In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document the problem.
[31:14.000 --> 31:22.000]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover-up has been exposed, perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[31:22.000 --> 31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.000 --> 32:01.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We are Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:22.000 --> 32:35.000]  This is an opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:48.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rulelawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:48.000 --> 32:59.000]  With hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material, learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from rulelawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:18.000 --> 33:43.000]  Well, I gotta tell you, there's a good song leading into this next segment because, ladies and gentlemen, if we allow this to continue, that's exactly what we're on is the highway to hell.
[33:43.000 --> 33:52.000]  We've been on it for quite a while to tell you the truth, but most people are enjoying the view so much they don't even notice the flames anymore, it seems.
[33:52.000 --> 34:14.000]  Okay, now, when a judge takes it upon himself to decide that a government actor is not liable because of a form of immunity that the law does not identify, then that judge is legislating from the bench. There's no if, answer, buts about this.
[34:14.000 --> 34:36.000]  There is no guesswork to this. That is what they are doing. They are creating a form of law out of thin air and they are not allowed to do that. They are especially not allowed to do it when it comes to facts.
[34:36.000 --> 34:55.000]  And when there is a question about whether or not an officer acted appropriately in the performance of their duties, regardless of policy, then this should be a question found by the jury as to whether or not that was so.
[34:55.000 --> 35:18.000]  Well, the policy says he can do this. I don't care. That policy is dead wrong. Nobody is allowed to shoot first and ask questions later, not even a cop. If nobody was shooting at him, he had no business pulling that trigger. End of discussion.
[35:18.000 --> 35:33.000]  We fear for our lives every time we get into any situation involving a cop these days, but we're not allowed to pull out a gun and just shoot him because we think he might shoot us first if we don't.
[35:33.000 --> 35:39.000]  And yet, that's precisely what they're able to get away with.
[35:39.000 --> 35:50.000]  Well, his hands were up in the air. I thought he might reach into his waistband quicker than I could pull the trigger, so I went ahead and shot him because I felt threatened.
[35:50.000 --> 36:02.000]  He was 150 yards away and running just as hard as he could, but I felt threatened because he looked backwards and then I shot him in the back of the head.
[36:02.000 --> 36:20.000]  Right here in Austin, the police detective that lied about getting attacked by the man who was shot in the neck and I think he died also.
[36:20.000 --> 36:31.000]  The cop said that the guy wrestled him down and tried to get his gun and when he couldn't, he turned around and ran away and then stopped and came back and that's when the officer decided to shoot and shot him in the neck.
[36:31.000 --> 36:37.000]  Turns out the evidence finally came to light that proved that was a complete lie.
[36:37.000 --> 36:41.000]  Now let's see, what evidence did that turn out to be?
[36:41.000 --> 36:55.000]  Hmm, gunpowder residue on the skin and the shirt. In other words, a dang near point blank shot.
[36:55.000 --> 37:08.000]  Nor did the angle of the entry wound coincide with the officer being on the ground and the other person standing when he got shot.
[37:08.000 --> 37:15.000]  In fact, it appeared to be from the angle of the bullet the other way around.
[37:15.000 --> 37:27.000]  The man was on the ground, the cop was behind and to the side of him and he got shot in the neck.
[37:27.000 --> 37:36.000]  Hmm, potential execution style maybe?
[37:36.000 --> 37:39.000]  But they're not all bad!
[37:39.000 --> 37:48.000]  Really? Then here's a whole line of them. You point out to me the one that's good.
[37:48.000 --> 38:02.000]  And you better not be wrong. If five years from now the one that you picked out is good turns out to be running a child porn ring or guilty of murdering a suspect ten years ago,
[38:02.000 --> 38:16.000]  or stealing drug money or is on the take or robs convenience stores and on their off days, then you're going to jail with them.
[38:16.000 --> 38:29.000]  You can't simply look at one of them and say they're not all bad or that that one is good.
[38:29.000 --> 38:39.000]  Can't do it. Yet they seem to presume that they can do that with us even when they cannot do it with each other.
[38:39.000 --> 38:44.000]  Now granted, cops learn a lot about what other cops are looking for.
[38:44.000 --> 38:53.000]  Cops learn a lot about how to hide the evidence, skew the evidence and make it look like they're anything but what they really are.
[38:53.000 --> 38:58.000]  I'm not saying that some of them aren't good enough to do that.
[38:58.000 --> 39:12.000]  But at some point someone had to see, hear or just feel something was up.
[39:12.000 --> 39:16.000]  Otherwise, how could this guy always have the perfect answer?
[39:16.000 --> 39:25.000]  How could this guy always have the perfect rebuttal to everything if anybody says or does something that might incriminate them?
[39:25.000 --> 39:32.000]  They've always got a perfect response as to why it can't possibly be true or them.
[39:32.000 --> 39:42.000]  And yet here we go, that cop winds up in the news somewhere down the road doing these kinds of things.
[39:42.000 --> 39:48.000]  But no one suspected anything.
[39:48.000 --> 39:54.000]  Are you kidding me?
[39:54.000 --> 40:00.000]  I can't look at a cop and not suspect them of something.
[40:00.000 --> 40:04.000]  Not anymore.
[40:04.000 --> 40:18.000]  I mean, when I joined up to be a deputy, I was working to do my best to be good at what I did, be a good person on top of that,
[40:18.000 --> 40:24.000]  not mistreat people and not be the kind of cops that I'd seen from time to time before I decided to do this.
[40:24.000 --> 40:33.000]  All because when it was all bowed down, it was to become the one thing I'd wanted to be since I was a little bitty kid and used to watch them on TV and that was a Texas Ranger.
[40:33.000 --> 40:40.000]  That was my whole goal in joining up with the Sheriff's Department was to get on the road to being a Texas Ranger.
[40:40.000 --> 40:52.000]  Now, in case you didn't know, the Texas Rangers are the only group of law enforcement officials that are specifically tasked with investigating public servants.
[40:52.000 --> 41:01.000]  Not saying they're the only ones that may wind up doing it, but they're the only ones with a specific task for doing it.
[41:01.000 --> 41:07.000]  And that was where I wanted to be.
[41:07.000 --> 41:24.000]  But the thing about it was, is that Sheriff's job is where I found out just how deceitful and conniving everyone that you trust actually is.
[41:24.000 --> 41:44.000]  The Sergeant over me in the jail screwed up the booking computer royally because he was embezzling from the county via materials and other resources for his own personal benefit to do his resume, his photographs,
[41:44.000 --> 41:50.000]  and all these things dealing with getting a bigger, better-paying job in one of the big cities here in Texas.
[41:50.000 --> 41:57.000]  That was his goal and he was using county resources to further those personal ends.
[41:57.000 --> 42:08.000]  And while he was doing it, being the computer illiterate moron that he was, he loaded the Command-Comm file into the booking computer program as if it was just some other file.
[42:08.000 --> 42:13.000]  Didn't know he had screwed up by doing that and then tried to save it back and corrupted it.
[42:13.000 --> 42:21.000]  And of course, in the days of MS-DOS, the Command-Comm goes bad, the whole system stops working, end of story.
[42:21.000 --> 42:23.000]  Well, that's exactly what he did.
[42:23.000 --> 42:34.000]  He knew that I had worked with computers because I'd done computer programming my last two years of high school on Commodore PET 32s, doing machine language and all that.
[42:34.000 --> 42:40.000]  I'd already done a little bit of my own with a programming business and some computer work.
[42:40.000 --> 42:45.000]  And I went in, I looked at what was going on, and I recognized what the problem was.
[42:45.000 --> 42:50.000]  I knew what it was when I tried to reboot the machine and got the error message for a Command-Comm file.
[42:50.000 --> 42:52.000]  And I knew exactly what it was.
[42:52.000 --> 43:05.000]  But unfortunately, the county being the county, they probably had a bootleg copy of DOS 5.1, I think is what it was, and no disk to reload it with.
[43:05.000 --> 43:10.000]  You couldn't just resist the drive and bring it back up, no harm, no foul.
[43:10.000 --> 43:16.000]  The only thing I could do was go home and get my DOS disk, which was 6.22.
[43:16.000 --> 43:22.000]  And I didn't even know what the booking software was going to run on version 6.22.
[43:22.000 --> 43:30.000]  But you can't just copy the Command-Comm back, you have to make all the system files on an old DOS computer match up before it will boot and do anything.
[43:30.000 --> 43:36.000]  So the first thing that was going to have to happen was the computer was going to have to be sysced and made bootable again.
[43:36.000 --> 43:39.000]  But I never got the chance to do that.
[43:39.000 --> 43:44.000]  And I'll finish the Y on the other side of this break here.
[43:44.000 --> 43:45.000]  So y'all hang on.
[43:45.000 --> 43:51.000]  Again, folks, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:51.000 --> 43:54.000]  The caller board is open if y'all want to call and get in line.
[43:54.000 --> 43:58.000]  And I'll start taking your calls after the next segment once we're done.
[43:58.000 --> 44:00.000]  So y'all hang on and we'll be right back.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  The jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflongradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:02.000]  I love logos.
[45:02.000 --> 45:06.000]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[45:06.000 --> 45:09.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[45:09.000 --> 45:10.000]  I need my truth pick.
[45:10.000 --> 45:12.000]  I'd be lost without logos.
[45:12.000 --> 45:15.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[45:15.000 --> 45:21.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[45:21.000 --> 45:23.000]  How can I help logos?
[45:23.000 --> 45:25.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[45:25.000 --> 45:30.000]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[45:30.000 --> 45:32.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[45:32.000 --> 45:36.000]  Now, go to logosradio.com.
[45:36.000 --> 45:39.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[45:39.000 --> 45:44.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[45:44.000 --> 45:45.000]  Do I pay extra?
[45:45.000 --> 45:46.000]  No.
[45:46.000 --> 45:48.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[45:48.000 --> 45:49.000]  No.
[45:49.000 --> 45:50.000]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[45:50.000 --> 45:51.000]  No.
[45:51.000 --> 45:52.000]  I mean, yes.
[45:52.000 --> 45:53.000]  Wow.
[45:53.000 --> 45:55.000]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[45:55.000 --> 45:57.000]  This is perfect.
[45:57.000 --> 45:58.000]  Thank you so much.
[45:58.000 --> 45:59.000]  We are welcome.
[45:59.000 --> 46:28.000]  Happy holidays, logos.
[46:28.000 --> 46:29.000]  Folks, we are back.
[46:29.000 --> 46:36.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[46:36.000 --> 46:37.000]  All right.
[46:37.000 --> 46:44.000]  Now, as I was saying, I never got a chance to fix the computer with an updated DOS.
[46:44.000 --> 46:51.000]  I didn't know if it was going to work or whatever, but at least it would have been up and whatever.
[46:51.000 --> 47:01.000]  But I offered to hang around and let the captain and the lieutenant know what was going on with it.
[47:01.000 --> 47:03.000]  And he said, no, no, no.
[47:03.000 --> 47:04.000]  I'll tell him.
[47:04.000 --> 47:05.000]  Thanks for what you told me.
[47:05.000 --> 47:10.000]  I think I know enough to tell him what the problem is and I'll let him know.
[47:10.000 --> 47:13.000]  The thing about it is that he didn't.
[47:13.000 --> 47:20.000]  Instead, he told them that I was the one that was using the computer instead of him.
[47:20.000 --> 47:31.000]  Now, this was a man that I worked under and for the most part trusted because I'd only been there a few weeks
[47:31.000 --> 47:41.000]  and hadn't got a chance to really know anyone there except for a couple of folks that I had either worked with somewhere else
[47:41.000 --> 47:46.000]  or one of which was actually a cousin of mine and I knew him.
[47:46.000 --> 47:49.000]  And Dan, if you're listening, good evening, man.
[47:49.000 --> 47:56.000]  But in any case, the fact is, is that Tinker is the one that messed up the computer,
[47:56.000 --> 47:59.000]  but he had told them that I was the one that did it.
[47:59.000 --> 48:10.000]  And they never even gave me an opportunity to present any sort of counterargument to it.
[48:10.000 --> 48:17.000]  They simply threatened me with prosecution based upon his information and that was going to be that.
[48:17.000 --> 48:22.000]  If I didn't just let them fire me and be done with it.
[48:22.000 --> 48:31.000]  That was when I decided that if this is how things are allowed to function in law enforcement,
[48:31.000 --> 48:36.000]  then I want no part of it at any level.
[48:36.000 --> 48:47.000]  Because if it's this, behind your backstabbing you and behind your back kind of stuff at this level, what's it going to be at a state level?
[48:47.000 --> 49:01.000]  What's it going to be when you have what is up to now been considered probably one of the most status minded public service directors
[49:01.000 --> 49:06.000]  the Department of Public Safety has ever had that is currently running it.
[49:06.000 --> 49:08.000]  And that's McCraw.
[49:08.000 --> 49:12.000]  And he's been there for a while, I think.
[49:12.000 --> 49:23.000]  But if it's that bad at the local level, how bad is it going to be at that level when they actually wrote a passage into the Texas Administrative Code?
[49:23.000 --> 49:31.000]  That despite the mandate of the Texas Rangers to investigate criminal conduct of public servants,
[49:31.000 --> 49:46.000]  they are specifically prohibited from investigating a public servant unless they have been directly empowered to do so by the director of the Department of Public Safety,
[49:46.000 --> 49:51.000]  which is who the Texas Rangers were rolled into, the state troopers.
[49:51.000 --> 50:04.000]  Okay, so the director of the Department of Public Safety is the only one who can give a Texas Ranger permission to investigate a public official.
[50:04.000 --> 50:17.000]  No matter what information the Ranger may have about corruption or evidence or anything else, they can't do anything with it that will be used and not get punished for it
[50:17.000 --> 50:29.000]  unless they had the specific approval and permission of the director to conduct that investigation to get that information.
[50:29.000 --> 50:41.000]  So as you can see, I'm kind of glad I did not wind up a Texas Ranger because the first person I'd have been investigating is the director of the Department of Public Safety.
[50:41.000 --> 50:58.000]  I wanted to know who is he in bed with that he is trying to protect by getting it put into the Administrative Code that I cannot do one of the specific mandates of my job unless he specifically tells me I can.
[50:58.000 --> 51:00.000]  Something stinks.
[51:00.000 --> 51:02.000]  But then again, that's the kind of person I am.
[51:02.000 --> 51:09.000]  When something stinks, I tend to try to find out what it is and why it's stinking.
[51:09.000 --> 51:13.000]  Especially if it's in the walls of where I live.
[51:13.000 --> 51:18.000]  And ladies and gentlemen, this stuff is in the walls where you live.
[51:18.000 --> 51:21.000]  Believe it.
[51:21.000 --> 51:50.000]  You cannot turn on your TV, pick up a newspaper, scan an Internet article or any type of online news source and not come across dozens upon dozens upon dozens of stories nationwide and many of them in your own state if not your own town or some town really close to you about a corrupt cop.
[51:50.000 --> 51:59.000]  You seem more about that than you do corrupt politicians these days.
[51:59.000 --> 52:14.000]  I guess it's because the politicians aren't usually known for shooting the witnesses to their criminal conduct and then claiming they did it because they feared for their life.
[52:14.000 --> 52:18.000]  Go figure that one out.
[52:18.000 --> 52:20.000]  This is where we're at, folks.
[52:20.000 --> 52:22.000]  The courts are why we're here.
[52:22.000 --> 52:26.000]  We no longer have a government of the people by the people for the people.
[52:26.000 --> 52:31.000]  We have a government of the court by the court for the government.
[52:31.000 --> 52:46.000]  When the courts say the law is not the law until we say it's the law, and this is what it means, you don't even have a functioning legislature anymore.
[52:46.000 --> 53:09.000]  Because the courts obviously can disagree with what the legislature put into the law, or we would not have a lot of the judicial doctrines that we have, where they have created law out of thin air, where they have ruled that the law as passed by the legislature doesn't mean what it says or is irrelevant.
[53:09.000 --> 53:17.000]  But we have it. It's ongoing right now.
[53:17.000 --> 53:21.000]  It's not okay, folks.
[53:21.000 --> 53:32.000]  No matter how much they try to butter it up and slide it in your throat and make you swallow it anyway, telling you it's delicious, it is not right.
[53:32.000 --> 53:34.000]  It is not just.
[53:34.000 --> 53:37.000]  It is not America.
[53:37.000 --> 53:43.000]  And it hasn't been for a long, long time.
[53:43.000 --> 53:57.000]  You better wake up to that fact, and you better start realizing it for what it really is, because it's going to cause us to lose everything if we don't.
[53:57.000 --> 54:09.000]  The socialists, the communists, they've taken over everything, and they're using our own system of government to do it, our own system of education to do it.
[54:09.000 --> 54:18.000]  All the things that they've got on their agenda, if you look, something that was published, I saw a thing about it today.
[54:18.000 --> 54:31.000]  There was an FBI agent back in the 50s who published a book called, I think, The Naked Communist.
[54:31.000 --> 54:41.000]  And in that, he gives the 48 principal planks of the Socialist Communist Mandate for America.
[54:41.000 --> 55:05.000]  And if you go down that list of 48 things that were written in the 50s, folks, you would be astounded at the number of those things that are currently being implemented or have already been implemented in this country.
[55:05.000 --> 55:07.000]  Guaranteed.
[55:07.000 --> 55:13.000]  If you're not shocked by that, then you're one of them.
[55:13.000 --> 55:22.000]  If you don't understand why it's important, you're one of them.
[55:22.000 --> 55:35.000]  Even if you don't think you are or realize you are, because what's on that list are the kinds of things that destroy countries from the inside.
[55:35.000 --> 55:41.000]  But they're there from the 50s.
[55:41.000 --> 55:45.000]  How long ago was that, folks?
[55:45.000 --> 56:14.000]  70 years ago, 70 years have passed since someone in the system acknowledged the problem, wrote up the information, and put it out there to be ignored by everyone ever since.
[56:14.000 --> 56:23.000]  It's just like the stuff William Cooper tried to put out before he got gunned down by your own government.
[56:23.000 --> 56:28.000]  He was trying to put out the information about what they were doing and how they were doing it.
[56:28.000 --> 56:34.000]  They killed him.
[56:34.000 --> 56:49.000]  And the ones who killed him are the same ones that are being protected by the courts, by the ones who control every department of government, and they don't work for us.
[56:49.000 --> 56:51.000]  None of them work for us.
[56:51.000 --> 56:56.000]  I don't care what uniform they're wearing, they don't work for us.
[56:56.000 --> 56:58.000]  That's an illusion.
[56:58.000 --> 57:09.000]  It's there only to pacify you long enough for the final hooks to be placed and the lines to be stretched tight to set them.
[57:09.000 --> 57:13.000]  Wait and see.
[57:13.000 --> 57:14.000]  All right.
[57:14.000 --> 57:17.000]  That said, let's see who is up on the caller board.
[57:17.000 --> 57:19.000]  We got one caller up here at the moment.
[57:19.000 --> 57:22.000]  512-646-1984, folks.
[57:22.000 --> 57:24.000]  Give us a call and get in line.
[57:24.000 --> 57:26.000]  We have Charles in Texas.
[57:26.000 --> 57:29.000]  What can we do for you?
[57:29.000 --> 57:31.000]  Hey, long time no talk.
[57:31.000 --> 57:34.000]  Well, let's see.
[57:34.000 --> 57:41.000]  You know Idiot went and tried to make a deal with the city attorney, correct?
[57:41.000 --> 57:46.000]  I think he posted on your Facebook group.
[57:46.000 --> 57:52.000]  Well, I went and got the records, of course, that I've been looking for from the state.
[57:52.000 --> 58:01.000]  And, of course, my county and my city are not on the list of cities that are certified to enforce proper code.
[58:01.000 --> 58:02.000]  Okay.
[58:02.000 --> 58:06.000]  Well, hang on just a second, Charles, and let's, we got to take this break and then we'll get back on the other side with you.
[58:06.000 --> 58:07.000]  Okay?
[58:07.000 --> 58:08.000]  Okay, no problem, sir.
[58:08.000 --> 58:09.000]  All right.
[58:09.000 --> 58:10.000]  Hold on.
[58:10.000 --> 58:11.000]  All right, folks.
[58:11.000 --> 58:14.000]  Again, 512-646-1984.
[58:14.000 --> 58:15.000]  Give us a call.
[58:15.000 --> 58:16.000]  Get in line.
[58:16.000 --> 58:17.000]  Let's talk.
[58:17.000 --> 58:18.000]  Also, don't forget.
[58:18.000 --> 58:24.000]  Please donate whenever you can to us individually, to the network, however, whatever you could manage,
[58:24.000 --> 58:27.000]  because we really need you to keep functioning here.
[58:27.000 --> 58:29.000]  You are what keeps us going.
[58:29.000 --> 58:31.000]  So please help out.
[58:31.000 --> 58:50.000]  That said, y'all hang on and we will be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 59:09.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[59:09.000 --> 59:21.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:21.000 --> 59:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 59:54.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[59:54.000 --> 01:00:01.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:06.000]  To follow in these flashes brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:46.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:58.000]  Today in History, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  in 1910 and entering 40 today in history.
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  And recent news.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:14.000]  Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing hemp into taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston,
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  Austin, and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones,
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law,
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:13.000]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  The paper by Tulane University identified a 5.5-inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:54.000]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the globe.
[01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:10.000]  This is Wolf Rody with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:38.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984, and we are currently talking to Charles in Texas.
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  All right, Charles, please continue.
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  Okay, so what he's done is he's gone back to the city attorney, cancelled the agreement he had with him, and has set up a new appointment.
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  You know, there's an impression that just because he can print this record, that all of the city attorneys say, look, you can't do this to me, you don't need to actually charge it.
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:42.000]  No, I don't think that has a small chance of flying, really. So he also does not need to know what he needs to do with this information that he's got now, and maybe you can give someone else maybe in the same situation.
[01:04:42.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  I need to be able to drill down a little bit better on what you're talking about, that he's gone back and done, and what it is he's expecting to do now.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  I mean, I remember the discussion, and I told him flat out that, yeah, he goes ahead and pleads guilty to those two offenses instead of everything else.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  The problem is, is those two offenses are the ones they can throw you in jail for next time, if they convict you, which by pleading guilty, they did.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Well, he hasn't pleaded guilty. He has not been taken to court yet.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  It doesn't have to be taken to court if he entered a plea of guilty. If he went into a plea agreement, then that's what he did.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  That's what I was afraid of. Now he's going to expect me to type up a notice to vacate the plea.
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  Yeah, and that's exactly what he's going to have to do.
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  Yeah, because he's gone back. Now he's decided that he's going to try and make this guy drop all the charges against him, and he has no clue what he's walking into.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  Because it's like he said, it's a dinner snake, and you're the only person there with a short phone.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  I don't think he's going to fly, and I don't think he realizes the way he's going to do it.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  Well, the problem is, is does he know what he's doing? If he doesn't know the subject matter, he doesn't know the law and how to argue it, then it's not going to make any difference.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:19.000]  A loss is a loss. How he got it's irrelevant.
[01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:28.000]  That's correct. And though he does not, because everything that he's doing with now is because I've tried to help him do it.
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  I mean, I brought all his motions up, everything else, and I was surprised when the city attorney did drop the 22 charges to be honest with you.
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  So, because I think the city attorney realized maybe someone is not as dumb as I think they are.
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:51.000]  Well, don't forget to go on the issue of the city attorney not having legitimate authority to prosecute.
[01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  The statute's trying to give away a constitutionally delegated power to someone eligible to wield it.
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  That does remind me. I do have a copy of that former agreement, by the way, in which it does stay in writing that he's a prosecutor for the municipal court.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  Yeah, but you kind of missed my point.
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  I wrote a motion for this and sold it separate from the rest of the seminar material, and it was a constitutional challenge motion.
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  There's two of them, actually. One, two, prosecuting attorneys being able to prosecute in the name of the state if they're a city attorney.
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  And the other one being the enactment of the Texas Transportation Code from the very get-go back in 1995.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  Now, the one dealing with the power of the city attorney to prosecute in the name of the state, they can't do that.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  And the statutes cannot give them the power to do that. Why?
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  Because the power to prosecute in the name of the state is constitutionally delegated, and it is delegated to two specific elected public offices.
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  None of which the city attorney is a part of or has any relationship with, nor does any private contract attorney have any such relationship in order to act on their behalf.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  So for anyone other than the county attorney, which is the one mandated by constitution and the law to actually prosecute these cases,
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  no one else can prosecute them. He can't delegate that authority to a city attorney.
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  And neither can the legislature via the Code of Criminal Procedure, which is what they did.
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  Okay. So the motion in the seminar material would not, if I went and talked that up, it would not help, it would not get him disqualified.
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:55.000]  The one that I have for it would, but that one I don't believe is part of the actual seminar material.
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  It might be. I wrote it up afterwards. I don't remember if I put it with it or not. You can look.
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:06.000]  But there should be one in there challenged to city attorney.
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  Yeah, that's what I'm talking about.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  Yeah, it's like 78 pages long, but there is not a statute that covers the subject that I did not put in there.
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  Every constitutional provision and every statute proving that there is no legitimate authority that can be invested in a city attorney or a hired gun attorney to prosecute in the name of the state is in that motion.
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  Every piece of law in existence in Texas is in that motion.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:41.000]  I thought this might come up when he was talking about talking to that city attorney.
[01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:45.000]  So I figured I pulled it up and I went ahead and started making all directions.
[01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:48.000]  So it could be put up in 10 p.m.
[01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  Yeah, and don't forget if the attorney attempts to negate any motions hearing or anything like that by saying, judge, these are all frivolous.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:04.000]  There's nothing in law that supports the information in these motions.
[01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  Object to that. Tinsy versus Peg Liaro.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:18.000]  The council, the testimony of council may not be used as a consideration for a directed verdict or for a judgment to dismiss.
[01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  Okay, they can't just dismiss all of your motions because the prosecuting attorney just declares them frivolous without any legal authority cited to back it up.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  That is testimony the court is not allowed to accept and the court is guilty of violating your rights if they do.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:40.000]  Tinsy versus Peg Liaro.
[01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  Yeah, I read that in the motion that they were just discussing.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  No, you didn't because it's not in there.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  Are you sure? Because I'm supposed to file somewhere.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  I just want to solve that case.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  Somebody was discussing it on Facebook.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  They had it in a post the other day on Facebook.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:17.000]  But the fact of the matter is that it's something that I've talked about in class a few times because the city attorney is always doing that as is the county attorney for that matter.
[01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  When you go to JP Court, county attorney does exactly the same thing.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  None of which is legal, none of which is legitimate, none of which the courts allowed to accept is true.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  Okay, I'll go ahead.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:44.000]  So that needs to be put into the form of a written objection and it needs to be brought up immediately and filed in the case if the attorney tries to do it.
[01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:52.000]  Got it, because I got told he has no idea what he's walking into.
[01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  So when he came out with those two charges, because the only thing still pending, I said, you did not do something right.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  Because if you walked in there and you still came out with something, then you got a problem.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:16.000]  Because if you're going to be tried for it, you should be tried for all of it and then let the court settle it out.
[01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:22.000]  Well, like I said, the two that they stuck him with are the two they can throw him in jail for the next time.
[01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:23.000]  Oh, yeah.
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:32.000]  Because they actually had two charges for failure to drive him with the license to drive it.
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  They dropped one of them in favor of the other one that had the failure to maintain responsibility attached to it.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  So that's what he's trying to do.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  And he doesn't realize how lucky he is because he could have been bumped up to a class A misdemeanor, I believe.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  That's what they tried to do to me at one point.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  I mean, that's what I want. Now, this record he's gotten, the public record that we got, can he use that in any kind of evidentiary format or anything like that if it goes to court?
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  No, he can't use anything he got outside of the court as evidence in a case that's got nothing to do with what happened outside of the court.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  Okay, that's what I was trying to tell him, but he's missing in the room, so I need him to hear that.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  Okay, well, that's all I had. I didn't want to take up all your time because I know you got a lot of people that are listening to talk to you.
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  But thank you for putting that up for us.
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  Yes, sir, not a problem.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  All right.
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  All right, have a good one.
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:45.000]  I'm on the radio listening.
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:47.000]  Yes, sir. Thanks.
[01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:48.000]  Bye.
[01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:56.000]  All right. All right. Next up is Robert. Robert, where are you calling from?
[01:13:56.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  Robert?
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:00.000]  Yes.
[01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  Where are you calling from?
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  Hello?
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  Are you on a speakerphone?
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  Hear me.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  Are you on a speakerphone?
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:13.000]  No.
[01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  Okay, I can hear you now.
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  Okay.
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  Okay, and where are you calling from?
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:22.000]  California.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  Okay, what's up?
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  I wanted to try to...
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:39.000]  What are the rules about being towed from a private parking lot once the police have you pulled over there?
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  If they instigate the start before that, can they tow you from a private parking lot?
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  Well, the question here is, was the tow based upon seizing the car as evidence for some legal purpose?
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  If it was just to inconvenience the owner, then no, it was not a legitimate tow.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  If they did it just to run up fees and charges and punish you because you didn't stop where or when they wanted you to, then that's retaliatory, but that's not a valid tow.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  If they were towing it for the purpose of evidence, that's something else.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  No.
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  No, I had the vehicle out within minutes of the time they towed it.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  But they towed it because they have a suspended license.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:36.000]  What does that have to do with the car?
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  I don't know.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  They said they had the right to tow it.
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  They don't.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  Okay.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  That's why I'm calling.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  That's what I thought I remembered you saying, but I wasn't sure.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  The only time they can deprive you of your property legitimately is, A, they have a warrant.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  B, it's being seized as evidence of a crime.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:06.000]  Okay.
[01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:08.000]  How does one deal with them over that?
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  Do them for it.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  It's the only way you've got recourse to handle it.
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  There's no other process for it.
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  And do I sue the officer?
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  You sue the officer, the tow company, and the driver.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  Okay.
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  For theft, aggravated theft?
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  They call it grand theft auto, right?
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  Yeah, I would think so.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  That's the crime.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Is there a cause of action for the crime other than deprivation of rights under color of law and theft of my personal property?
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:58.000]  You've got to have a cause of action on the civil side, not just a criminal charge to get them charged with.
[01:16:58.000 --> 01:16:59.000]  Hang on just a second.
[01:16:59.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  All right.
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:11.000]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:16.000]  Any amount is appreciated.
[01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:30.000]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:30.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons?
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:21.000 --> 01:19:29.000]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I take a look at my life and realize there's nothing left.
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  Cause I've been practicing and laughing so long that even my mama thinks that my mind is gone.
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:38.000]  But I ain't ever crossed a man that didn't deserve it.
[01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  To be treated like a bump, you know that's unheard of.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:44.000]  You better watch how you're talking and where you're walking.
[01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  Or you and your homies might be lying to each other.
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  This is ruleoflawradio, the calling number 5126461984 and we are talking with Robert in California.
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  Alright Robert, go ahead.
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  Alright.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:08.000]  So Dave, I need a cause of action?
[01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  Yeah, a cause of action is what gives you grounds to sue, yeah.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:26.000]  But you got to find out what it's called in California for the proper cause of action and that the actions of the police department and the tow service and the tow driver all match up with what constitutes that cause of action.
[01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:37.000]  For instance, if it says that the cause of action is based upon fact A, fact B and fact C existing, then all of those have to exist for you to have a valid cause of action.
[01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:46.000]  There can be more, but there cannot be less if the court says these are the three standard requirements to meet.
[01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  So you got to find out what that is.
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:54.000]  Go to legal aids, find a legal aid office there in California and go ask them.
[01:20:54.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  Okay.
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:57.000]  Alright.
[01:20:57.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  Alright.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  And how about, you know, the suspended license, the license is expired, but they keep telling me it's suspended.
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  Well, which came first, the expiration or the suspension?
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  The suspension.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  Okay, then it's not expired if it was suspended prior to its expiration.
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  But I actually don't need the license for what I'm doing.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  It's kind of not the point. If you're going to make an argument about the license at all, then that's the problem you face.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  Otherwise, leave the license out of it.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  Okay, but how do I deal with the courts over the suspended license?
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  Again, if you weren't engaged in the privileged activity to which the license relates, the status of the license is irrelevant.
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  Is it not?
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  It got you.
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:21:59.000]  Okay.
[01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:01.000]  So why are we talking about it?
[01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  Exactly.
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  Okay.
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  I understand what you're talking about.
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:10.000]  I believe I understand what you're talking about.
[01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  So why would I need a license if the license itself does not apply to the thing you're actually doing?
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  Exactly.
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:23.000]  I was not in transportation when all this occurred, so why would I need a license?
[01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  No, again, that's not the question to be asking.
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  The state has no evidence I was engaged in any privileged activity to which such a license relates.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  The status of the license suspended or otherwise is irrelevant, lacking such evidence.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  Okay.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  All right.
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  All right, Ed.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  Thanks a lot for your time.
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:55.000]  I'm sure you have a lot of other people waiting and I appreciate your time.
[01:22:55.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:22:57.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:22:57.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  Thank you.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:00.000]  All right.
[01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  Now we have Steve.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  Let's see.
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:05.000]  Where is MO?
[01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  Is that Missouri or Montana?
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  Missouri.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  Okay.
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  What's up, Steve?
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  Howdy, Eddie.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  Long time listener.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  First time for you, I guess.
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:23.000]  Hey, you was talking like about a month ago about constitutional convention.
[01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:29.000]  And even though I don't think it would work, what does that actually entail?
[01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  Actually, how many people you have to have and how would you proceed in getting amendment?
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:40.000]  Well, I was not talking about a constitutional convention in the strictest sense of the word.
[01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:50.000]  What I was talking about was the people of a given state redoing the constitution of their own state,
[01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  not a federal constitution, but of their own state, and that they get as many of their
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  federal citizens to sign on to it as possible.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  They come up with it, a group of people that put the effort into it, and they put it out
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  there for the rest of the public to read, comment on whatever, and sign on to adopt,
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  if that's what they're going to do.
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  And they basically form their own constitutional convention outside of existing government
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:27.000]  parameters, which every state constitution I'm aware of authorizes the people to do.
[01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  Every one of them gives the people the power to alter, reform, or abolish the existing
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  government when it no longer serves the people.
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  And we definitely do not have state government serving the people.
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  The federal constitution.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  The state constitution, right.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:44.000]  Okay.
[01:24:44.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  When they amend the state constitution, they can do it in such a way as to provide a new
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  means of seeking to have a federal constitutional convention and redo the issues we've got there
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  as well.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:03.000]  But all the states have to participate in that.
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  That's why we need to start at the state level first.
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  We've got to get all the states on the same page about what we have and what we don't
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  as far as our rights anymore.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  And until we do that, we're being in the wind.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  Yeah.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  Well, I was just wondering, because besides taxation, which is a biggie, Missouri did the
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  right to bear arms, and they pretty well described it, you know, the right of the people to bear
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  their arms on that bull.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  What I don't get is how the other states are able to even interfere with the right to bear
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  arms.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  Well, that's just it.
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:43.000]  None of them are able to do it.
[01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:44.000]  Okay.
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  Even Texas, the second clause that was put on to the end of that in the Texas Constitution
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  came well after that right was established.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  Okay.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  Now, since the Constitution is not the source of a right, the Constitution cannot be a means
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  of removing a right that belongs to an individual.
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  Therefore, it cannot alter a right belonging to an individual.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:19.000]  So, it doesn't matter how they amend the Constitution if the right predates the Constitution, period,
[01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  because it's not the source.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  The second clause of that that was added in the Texas Constitution was to prevent slaves
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:37.000]  from owning and carrying guns or people of color without some sort of governmental check
[01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:38.000]  and permission.
[01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  It had nothing to do with the white colonists.
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:42.000]  Pardon me.
[01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  I'm not saying that's right or wrong.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  I'm just explaining history here, folks.
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  So, don't get your race panties in a bunch.
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  The simple fact is that the white colonists had that right before the Constitution was
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  even put together.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  So, the Constitution couldn't alter it even if it wanted to because the first clause absolutely
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  protects that right for the people who created the Constitution.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  The second clause therefore could not take it away nor give the Texas government any legitimate
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  authority to license or regulate the carrying of arms by people who were not slaves or people
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:21.000]  of color.
[01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  It was all put in place because of that slave that started that uprising and was going around
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  slaughtering and fighting every white plantation owner, colonists, whatever.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  They were just killing everybody that came across them that wasn't black.
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:45.000]  Now, I realize why they were doing it, but they were just, that's the whole reason that
[01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  second clause was put in.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  But it could not change the rights that already existed for the rest of the people.
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  Right.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  Well, the Congress, people, they took the oath to the Constitution among the police and
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:01.000]  all that.
[01:28:01.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  We already know the place was corrupted.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:11.000]  But whoever legislate law and try to change the law to pit their rationality, I guess,
[01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  to take guns away from people or have them registered and all that stuff, they're already
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  in their own oath is how the heck we will be able to fix that.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  Absolutely.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  But that's why we would need a constitutional convention.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  We would need a way to show that this has never been a legitimate way of conducting
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  government and we're not making, and we would still be able to punish them after we put
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  the Constitution in place, even if it contained a clause that said that there shall be no
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  ex post facto law, in other words, no law, nothing that was not criminal before can be
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:53.000]  named a crime now and you retroactively punish them for it.
[01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  The fact is that violating their oath is already a crime.
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  It has always been a crime.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  Just no one's punishing them for it.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  Right.
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:04.000]  It is called sedition.
[01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  It's a crime that already exists.
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:12.000]  And every time they violate their oath, they are engaging in sedition.
[01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:15.000]  For no reason, sedition.
[01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  Yeah.
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  Reason in America has a very specific definition and criteria for its commission.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  Sedition, however, is very straightforward.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  An attempt to alter a constitutional form of government by unconstitutional means.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  And every time they violate their oath, that is exactly what they're doing.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  When a constitution is interventional, you want to set up everything like the state
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  here, is there a certain amount of people we have to have before it can be changed?
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  I don't think so.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  There's nothing in the Constitution now that says there is.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  Hang on just a minute and we'll carry this discussion on the other side of this break.
[01:29:58.000 --> 01:29:59.000]  Just a minute.
[01:29:59.000 --> 01:30:01.000]  Hang on, folks.
[01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:05.000]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number
[01:30:05.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  and date of birth.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:09.000]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:43.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  I lay blank spaces on forms all the time or I write N slash A for not applicable and
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:02.000]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory
[01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  for employment or government requirement and I won't give my phone number to a company
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  or an organization unless I actually want them to call me and that's pretty rare.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  It's like exercising a muscle.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht.
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:33.000]  I lost my son.
[01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:34.000]  My nephew.
[01:31:34.000 --> 01:31:35.000]  My uncle.
[01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  My nephew.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  My son.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  The rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic similar.
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  In today's America we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:25.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:30.000]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:34.000]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:36.000]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:49.000]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:52.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:52.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:05.000]  By ordering your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:05.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  All right folks, we are back.
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  This is rule of law radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  We have another 30 minutes of the show and we are currently talking to Steve in Missouri.
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  All right Steve, please continue.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:11.000]  Okay, well I was just wondering, you know, how many people might take it?
[01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  I never did anything about a number either.
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  Yeah, there's nothing in there that says how many have to vote on it, how many it has to take.
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  Basically like any constitution, a small number of people put it together.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  They submit it to the public to vote on.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:33.000]  And to me we need to do a grassroots movement on doing that to do a rewrite of the state constitution
[01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  and get the people on board in large enough numbers to get it changed to get it all brought up for a vote.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  I'm sorry, go ahead.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:51.000]  Who will put it on the ballot and be responsible to actually have to put it on the ballot?
[01:34:51.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  I'm not sure a change to the constitution has to be on any particular ballot.
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  I mean if the people vote to change it, which our bill of rights says we can, if the people hold the vote, that's it.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  It doesn't matter what the rest of the government wants to say about it because their authority comes from the constitutions we write.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  And if the new one passes by a majority, then it replaces the one they're operating under so it's irrelevant what they would have to say about it.
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  They don't have any mandates for it.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  There's a whole reason why the authority to alter and abolish government is in the Texas Bill of Rights.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  Right. The same thing here with Missouri itself.
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  Did not know even if you got the signatures and you get somehow you put on a ballot of some type or whatever it is to have people vote on it.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  If you just put it up for public vote, if you find a way to be able to hold a vote and accurately collect and count those votes and verify those votes, then if it passes, it passes.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  And there's nothing the legislature or any other thing of government could do about it legitimately.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:25.000]  So would it just the state or federal? You would have to know how many people are in your state and whether or not the existing Constitution, which it shouldn't bind you, but it might,
[01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  says that there is a certain percentage of a vote required to amend it or whatever, which I doubt.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  It's usually simply a majority vote. So if you know how many people are in the state and they vote to do it, more than 51% of them, then it's a done deal.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  Okay. Even if people don't vote, then would they say, okay, that wasn't a correct ballot to be done or whatever vote?
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  Well, if they're going to make that argument, then they would have to make that same argument in relation to them holding public office, wouldn't they?
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  Yes. Well, I agree with you 100%. Just like the president and all that.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:12.000]  Well, they can't make that argument and not look like a bunch of idiots, can they?
[01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  Yeah.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  You can't argue that the vote for you was legitimate when not everybody voted, but a vote for a Constitution is not legitimate because not everybody voted.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  Right.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  But then again, that's one of the reasons why getting it into the public and getting it as many people on board with it as possible to vote for it makes it all the better.
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  It's not absolutely essential, but it makes it all the better.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:45.000]  Okay.
[01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  So that's why I was wondering, you know, exactly what kind of process it would take and to actually be able to have it submitted weren't they?
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  Well, the Constitution, ours at least, does not stipulate any specific process, vote count, or anything else.
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  It simply says the people have the right to do it, but it does not say how many of us that takes.
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  If there would be a state statute stating any...
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  The state statute cannot create conditions.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:21.000]  The Constitution does not give them the authority to create, and there isn't any.
[01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  Well, that's what I thought.
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  Okay.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  All right.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  Well, that's what I got other questions, but either way, that'll be down the line when I get precise what I want to say and ask you.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  We'll be gone for a while, so I'll figure that out later.
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  Okay.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  Thanks a lot, Eddie.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  Thank you.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  All right.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  Now we have Mike in Indiana.
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  Mike, what can we do for you?
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  Hey, Eddie, I just had a quick one for you.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  I spoke with you a couple of weeks ago, and I had some questions regarding doing the historical legal research, like taking the current code or title sections and taking them back to the initial legislative enactment
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  or the enrolled bill, I believe, the term you used.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  You had mentioned that I should look in the state constitution for something that mentioned something along the lines of what you guys at Texas have, which is, I believe, Article 3, Section 30,
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:28.000]  laws passed by bill, amendments changing purpose prohibited.
[01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  I have not been able to, I can't find anything like that in this, the Arizona Constitution, unfortunately.
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  Now, I was curious if it would be worthwhile, or if you've ever heard of something like that, that would perhaps be, like, some statutory mechanism that would say something of that nature.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  A statute cannot affect the Constitution.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  If it's not in the Constitution, a statute can't make the Constitution say anything.
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  Okay.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  So even if there is a law in place to do something like what you're talking about, it's going to be a law.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:17.000]  It's not going to have anything at all to do with the Constitution unless the Constitution itself authorizes it.
[01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  Okay.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  I'm basically, I'm trying to, you know, look up the transportation code here in Arizona and get all, take it all the way back.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  And I'm, Arizona Constitution has a single subject matter clause in the legislative section, but unlike you guys in Texas where you have that pretty strong language that a bill cannot,
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  the purpose of a bill cannot be changed by amendments.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  And there isn't that here in Arizona, and it's kind of a, kind of a bummer.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  But just to try to cover my bases and see, because if I look back, and at some point between, I believe, what, the early 1940s and now that there was a amendment to the bill,
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:25.000]  the initial transportation act's changing the purpose of it, and if there's not anything specifically prohibiting that in the Constitution, it would seem you're kind of out of luck, perhaps.
[01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  Well, it may be.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  I haven't studied the Arizona Constitution.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  I don't know how it lays it out for what the legislature can and can't do.
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  The majority of states that I've seen, including Texas, specifically prohibits any bill from being law if it hasn't been read on the house over, four of each house over three several days.
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:42:10.000]  It specifically prohibits them from enacting any law outside of a single subject matter with multiple subjects in it. It specifically prohibits them from delegating that authority to anybody else by specifying exactly who gets it in the first place, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  So I haven't studied the Arizona Constitution.
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  I can't really answer your question as to what it does or doesn't say.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  If you can't find it, then I don't know what to tell you.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  It may not be in there.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  Arizona is one of those places where you guys were a federal territory before you were a state.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:37.000]  So how your Constitution was set up could very well be very different.
[01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:49.000]  Texas was a completely independent sovereign nation. We were not part of the United States or any state territory at all before we allegedly joined the union.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:54.000]  We always were a separate sovereign country.
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  And we're the only state that became a state that was ever like that.
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:05.000]  All the rest of them were territories.
[01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  Okay.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  Okay.
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  Well, that's about it for now.
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  So I'll get back down to the whole library.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  I appreciate your time.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  See if they can help you.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  See if they know of anything that may have that.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  They can answer those questions if you'll just talk to the librarians down there.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  They may know.
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  All right.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:25.000]  Well, thank you very much, Eddie.
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:26.000]  Have a nice evening.
[01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  Thank you.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  You too.
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  Bye.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  All right.
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  That's 30 seconds before the break.
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  Then we've got one more segment, but I am out of color.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  So I'm either going to die a tribe or I need someone else to talk to.
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  512-646-1984 if you want to be on the last segment of the show tonight.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  Y'all hang on and we will be right back after this.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:44:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:34.000]  We have come to trust Jevity so much.
[01:44:34.000 --> 01:44:40.000]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:52.000 --> 01:44:57.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:24.000]  and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:27.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  You can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:57.000]  pro-state tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:57.000 --> 01:46:26.000]  It's called toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  All right, folks, this is rule of law radio. We are now in the last segment of the show.
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  Okay, now, oh, I did get a couple others up here on the board.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  All right, Chris in California, what do you got?
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  Hello, Chris.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  Okay, there you are.
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  Well, for one thing, I wouldn't sure if you are current tonight,
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  because no one ever mentions the day, I guess, only when you first come on.
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  Which I did.
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:14.000]  That would be something to think about for the future.
[01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  Well, if you call in and it won't connect you, then it's not a live show.
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:24.000]  I figured as much. That would work too, I bet.
[01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  Okay, so what do you got?
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:36.000]  To light up some bar grievances here for this guy that's through my old man under the bus.
[01:47:36.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  And by the way, I appreciate you reading through all that timeline I sent you.
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:54.000]  But of course, I need to know basically now just if there's a downside, if he starts getting these things.
[01:47:54.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  And I mean, there's really not a whole lot he's going to be able to do about it, right?
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  I mean, he just maybe tack on a few thousand bucks.
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  I mean, you know, I know you guys are about the only ones talking about the bar grievance people.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  You mentioned the law society, for example, and there are a bunch of lawyers that think you're nuts by calling them up and saying, hey, how do I go after an attorney?
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:29.000]  So it's like you're limited on the sources to learn how to fight back against these people.
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:47.000]  Well, that's true as you are because you can't trust the agencies themselves to do their job and hold them accountable because the most immoral people in the world are the ones being asked to uphold the morals of someone else just like them.
[01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:51.000]  There's absolutely no conflict of interest in that, right?
[01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:54.000]  Of course.
[01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  So what would be the downside, just for example, I mean, you know...
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  Well, just bar grieving, that's just when it comes to this, then Randy gets into how much fun it is.
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  Well, just to bar grieving, there is no downside to it. They can't come back after you for bar grieving an attorney.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  Yeah, that I kind of figured, but I'm thinking he might even be less willing to negotiate if this begins.
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  Well, that too may be true, but that would be harder to prove that he's doing.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  And the question is whether or not he has to negotiate under whatever contract he's got in the first place.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  If he's doing favors, then he's not obligated to do favors. He could just do them or choose not to.
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  For example, he already offered to take a few thousand off the bill if we provided a lump payment.
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:50:07.000]  So there's definitely room to maneuver, but I've been playing Little Miss Muffa with him so far,
[01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:13.000]  and that I think is going to end this week.
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  I'm not sure about what that reference actually means, but okay.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  Well, I'm just making it out like I'm trying to get him paid back anyway we can without providing a proposal.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  And the proposal is being worked on to provide at some point in the future,
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:46.000]  because now I've taken over the responsibility. All of this landed in my lap suddenly,
[01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:49.000]  and it's been a crash course to kind of figure out what to do with it.
[01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  Obviously, most of it's over and done with. The case was settled.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  I don't know if you recall any of the detail.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  So I'm just going to just have to wing it and see what happens and then maybe let you know down the road.
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:09.000]  Possibly so.
[01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  Like I say, based upon the information I had in your email, the response I sent back is the best I got to offer you.
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:19.000]  It is what it is on those grounds.
[01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  Yeah, no, no. And that was kind of, as I said, I don't know if you've got my reply was non-applicable, because there was never any case against it.
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  It was too cleanly done. And so it's just a matter now of threatening multiple grievances and multiple people that were involved,
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  other attorneys and well, the referencing attorneys.
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:55.000]  One other thing I thought of that I think I heard from Randy was when you send in your grievances, if you go certified mail and you don't hear anything back,
[01:51:55.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  I guess the way you're supposed to, and you file for insurance, that's something that you've ever heard could be collected on if you don't receive certificate or no.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:21.000]  If you don't receive confirmation of receipt, you can file. But if you get the card back with a signature, then you're not going to be able to say, I never got anything back and I want to make a claim.
[01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  Right. I've heard that a lot of times you don't get anything back.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  And so if you send a certified mail return receipt requested and you don't get anything back, then yeah, then you could claim that the post office never delivered it.
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:40.000]  And you've heard that that can work in your...
[01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:50.000]  Well, I've never done it, but I mean logically speaking, that's the whole reason you paid for it to be sent certified and it's the whole reason you insured it, right?
[01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:55.000]  Did you insure it for the contest or did you insure it for delivery?
[01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  Well, I haven't gotten that far yet.
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  But you see my point?
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  Yeah.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:12.000]  So it really doesn't matter if you insured it for delivery, then there's no proof it was delivered. You collect.
[01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  If you insured it for the contents, there's no proof the contents ever got where they were supposed to be and you no longer have them. Therefore, you can collect.
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:27.000]  So it's going to be for the delivery in this case is what it sounds like?
[01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:33.000]  Essentially, yeah, because that's all you're trying to do is verify it was delivered.
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:43.000]  But if you get nothing back, it doesn't matter because you're going to be able to make the claim that, hey, I never got confirmation they received what was in it.
[01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:45.000]  I never got confirmation of delivery.
[01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  Therefore, I want to refund on my certified mail and I want my insurance money.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:54:00.000]  So I'll just figure out a, pull a number out of my hat or you got any ideas on what kind of a price tag to put on there?
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  I have no idea. It all depends on what you can afford to do away with to get it there.
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  I hear that. All right. Well, that's where I'm headed.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  And just remember that whatever amount you pay out for the insurance and delivery, if you get the card back, it's gone. You're not getting any of that back.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:22.000]  No, I understand how that works.
[01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  Okay. That's pretty straightforward.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  Very little in the rest of this, I guess, is or there's somebody to be writing a book on how to handle lawyers and fight back and, and be able to do this, you know, effectively.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:41.000]  Because it's obviously the whole profession.
[01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  So, anywho, that's what I got for this, for this time.
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:49.000]  All right. I appreciate you calling in.
[01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:51.000]  All right. You have a good evening then.
[01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  Thank you.
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  All right. All right.
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:54:59.000]  All right. Now we have Scott in New York.
[01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:01.000]  Scott, what do you got?
[01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  Good evening there, sir. Nice getting you on the phone.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:09.000]  I actually would like to help you out with some of my things you mentioned that you don't put the date on the show.
[01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:13.000]  Sometimes that's because they can tell.
[01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  If you do put the date, it helps to categorize things.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  I put the date, I say the date at the beginning of the show.
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  I don't say it throughout the show.
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  My point is, you need to make some videos in my opinion.
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  That's actually, I think, how I found you.
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  And I still keep seeing the same old videos out there, year after year after year.
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:36.000]  You are so amazing when you're just rolling off the cuff.
[01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  Like one example is when you're saying about if they, you know, there's no such thing as a big cop.
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  I forget the word you used, like a jumbo shrimp kind of thing.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  But if you had some videos, short videos that actually could be categorized as about this subject matter, that subject matter,
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  you could promote your sponsors, promote yourself, promote whatever you like to promote while you're sleeping.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  You may be getting donations, just some videos that are shorter, more concise,
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  and people like to look at stuff rather than listen, especially when they don't know what they're going to get in the show.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  You can have a photo, you know, photos going by in the video to look at, even if it's extracted from your live show.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:21.000]  And you have the ability to actually focus and make a short ten minute video, half hour video.
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:22.000]  And it would help spread the word.
[01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  It gives people something to spread in order to promote you to others that wouldn't otherwise find you.
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:38.000]  I just, you know, people are sharing videos and it's more likely for somebody to listen to a video.
[01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:44.000]  A lot of people get things shared to them and they don't even click on it, don't even look at it, just, you know, blow it off.
[01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:48.000]  And I think it's just a door that you're not using.
[01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:54.000]  You just speak off the top of your head some great stuff that we would call gold, you know, back in the day.
[01:56:54.000 --> 01:57:00.000]  That's how I learned this because when I used to listen to Carl Lent, it was the listeners that used to re-listen to the shows
[01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:02.000]  and say, well, this is bad if you lost your kid.
[01:57:02.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  This is about traffic tickets, this is about a red blood, and they would even edit out some of the noise, background noise,
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  and put the videos out there with the gold, you know, that's categorized.
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  So what do you think about that?
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:20.000]  Well, it's all great and all.
[01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  If I had the means to do it, I barely got time to make lunch, much less more videos.
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  That's why I'm, you know, it was the reason why I'm down to one show a week here.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:40.000]  I got so much stuff on my plate trying to help people and redo the seminar material and all the other projects I've got on my plate here.
[01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  It's very difficult to make time.
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:48.000]  Plus, I'm not really set up to sit down and make a series of short videos about anything.
[01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  All those videos that I'm in that you're talking about were all made over at Info Wars by Alex and his crew.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  There's no way I could sit down and produce all that stuff on my own at that level, or even rather anything beyond a web stream.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  You could reach out to the listeners just like Carl Lentz, but he didn't reach out, they did it on their own.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  Anyway, I'm meaning to tell you that ever since you did that thing about the police thing, and then many people called back to re-ask about it,
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  and then you did it right off the top of your head once again.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  And that kind of content the listeners could take to put the video, it doesn't have to be you.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  They could help you, instead of giving you a donation, they could spend the time that they have the ability to do that and put that out,
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  and that'll keep working for years to come.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  Anyway, this is my opinion, my two cents.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  I wanted to try to help you out with things that I, you know, perceive from my...
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  All right. Well, I appreciate it, Scott. Thanks.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  Thank you for calling in.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:45.000]  All right, folks, it's been the Monday Night Rural Law Radio Show.
[01:58:45.000 --> 01:58:48.000]  Y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:58:48.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bible for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:04.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse,
[01:59:04.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll-free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross-references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.