ROL_2020-01-24_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:26.000]  Well, I received my remedy today, came in a box just like they say, I accepted the value
[00:26.000 --> 00:36.000]  right away, if not sooner, not later, we are originators, and a pathway seems to get straighter
[00:36.000 --> 00:47.000]  every day, and I can take anything that belongs to me and put it to good use. What I was good
[00:47.000 --> 01:02.000]  for the gender, don't work for the good. I know some part of tech, I know some engineer, they see me
[01:02.000 --> 01:04.000]  every day.
[01:04.000 --> 01:12.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rude Law Radio. I would have said Brett somebody,
[01:12.000 --> 01:21.000]  but he took that too well last time. Okay, and we are talking to Tina in California.
[01:21.000 --> 01:23.000]  Okay, Tina, you had one more thing for us.
[01:23.000 --> 01:31.000]  One more thing. You have heard of Joseph Otting, the Comptroller of the Current Secret?
[01:31.000 --> 01:32.000]  Yes.
[01:32.000 --> 01:41.000]  Former CEO of One West Bank under Mnuchin. Why would somebody in that position whose
[01:41.000 --> 01:46.000]  current net worth is between $13 and $130 million?
[01:46.000 --> 01:54.000]  Wait a minute, I'm having trouble understanding you. When we do radio, when Brett first came
[01:54.000 --> 02:02.000]  on the radio, we sat down and I talked about this, when you are doing radio, people can't
[02:02.000 --> 02:09.000]  see your lips. Almost everybody reads lips and they don't realize they do, but we hear
[02:09.000 --> 02:14.000]  part of it and we see how the lips move and we can tell the rest of it. But on radio,
[02:14.000 --> 02:21.000]  you can't see the lips. So we have to hear the word, formulate the word in our brain
[02:21.000 --> 02:28.000]  and then put it together and make sense of it. So if you listen to announcers, they speak
[02:28.000 --> 02:35.000]  just slightly slower than people in normal conversation. For your normal conversation,
[02:35.000 --> 02:39.000]  you just kind of run your words together. It doesn't make any difference. But when you
[02:39.000 --> 02:45.000]  are on the radio, you need to leave a slight space between each word and it gives the listener
[02:45.000 --> 02:51.000]  time to formulate these words and stitch them together.
[02:51.000 --> 02:52.000]  Okay.
[02:52.000 --> 03:06.000]  That makes sense. Joseph Otting, why would someone of his wealth and position as a CEO
[03:06.000 --> 03:12.000]  of a bank in Pasadena, California, and he lives in California, why would he have an interest
[03:12.000 --> 03:23.000]  or ownership in a property with an assessed value of $4,479 in Macon, Georgia in 2012
[03:23.000 --> 03:28.000]  at the height of the foreclosure?
[03:28.000 --> 03:32.000]  Wait a minute. Who was this that had?
[03:32.000 --> 03:33.000]  Joseph.
[03:33.000 --> 03:38.000]  Are you talking?
[03:38.000 --> 03:43.000]  He's the current Comptroller of the currency.
[03:43.000 --> 03:51.000]  Oh, he has a property in Georgia that's in foreclosure.
[03:51.000 --> 04:01.000]  No, he had an ownership interest according to the report I'm looking at, that this property
[04:01.000 --> 04:04.000]  in Macon, Georgia.
[04:04.000 --> 04:09.000]  That's Macon, Georgia, yeah.
[04:09.000 --> 04:22.000]  The assessed value was $4,479. Why would someone of his stature have an ownership at that time
[04:22.000 --> 04:25.000]  in that kind of property?
[04:25.000 --> 04:40.000]  Not sure, but if I were of a, what's the word, distrustful nature, I would think that a
[04:40.000 --> 04:48.000]  property out of the state is a great place to launder money.
[04:48.000 --> 04:59.000]  I could take my equity out of my ownership of that property by taking a loan against
[04:59.000 --> 05:07.000]  the property, and then someone who wanted to pay me off for something, instead of giving
[05:07.000 --> 05:14.000]  me that money that I would have to show as income, they'll go pay off that debt on that
[05:14.000 --> 05:18.000]  property in Georgia.
[05:18.000 --> 05:23.000]  As soon as it gets paid off, I can take that equity out of the property by getting another
[05:23.000 --> 05:26.000]  loan on it, and then get somebody else to pay it off.
[05:26.000 --> 05:33.000]  This is a favorite way judges use to launder their payoff money.
[05:33.000 --> 05:41.000]  This property has only got a land value of $2,000 and an improvement value of $8,000.
[05:41.000 --> 05:47.000]  This lands worth millions.
[05:47.000 --> 05:59.000]  Well, I'd have to go back through my motion for judicial disclosure, but there are ways
[05:59.000 --> 06:02.000]  of laundering money using property like this.
[06:02.000 --> 06:10.000]  Just because the property has a value of $4,000 or $5,000 does not prevent a bank from giving
[06:10.000 --> 06:20.000]  the judge a loan against the property for $200,000.
[06:20.000 --> 06:26.000]  Then someone else comes in and pays off that loan.
[06:26.000 --> 06:36.000]  That kind of leaves a record if the lender files a lien against the property.
[06:36.000 --> 06:43.000]  If the lender doesn't file a lien against the property, how do you find that?
[06:43.000 --> 06:47.000]  It just kind of disappears.
[06:47.000 --> 06:52.000]  It's a good way to launder money.
[06:52.000 --> 06:55.000]  There are tricks I don't know.
[06:55.000 --> 07:03.000]  Finance is not my area, but it sounds like something they could easily use to launder
[07:03.000 --> 07:08.000]  money and there could be a perfectly reasonable explanation.
[07:08.000 --> 07:16.000]  It could belong to a parent or a relative, perhaps a relative who's in an old folks' home
[07:16.000 --> 07:21.000]  and he's maintaining that property as long as that person's alive.
[07:21.000 --> 07:27.000]  We had one house across the street from me that set empty for eight or 10 years.
[07:27.000 --> 07:34.000]  I asked the owner, the guy next to me held it, and I asked him why he didn't do something
[07:34.000 --> 07:35.000]  with that property.
[07:35.000 --> 07:41.000]  He said it was his mother's house and they put her in an old folks' home.
[07:41.000 --> 07:48.000]  The only way she would agree to go to the home is if she could always know that her property
[07:48.000 --> 07:52.000]  was there waiting for her in case she decided to go home.
[07:52.000 --> 07:58.000]  That wasn't an option for her, but it gave her peace in knowing her home was there.
[07:58.000 --> 08:03.000]  There could be a legitimate reason.
[08:03.000 --> 08:04.000]  Okay.
[08:04.000 --> 08:11.000]  I have not found relative related to him on this, but I was wondering if it was perhaps
[08:11.000 --> 08:17.000]  he slipped up and bought one of those little foreclosures and slipped it for a quick profit
[08:17.000 --> 08:18.000]  or something.
[08:18.000 --> 08:22.000]  You should not have done that.
[08:22.000 --> 08:27.000]  Did you read that motion for judicial disclosure?
[08:27.000 --> 08:28.000]  I did.
[08:28.000 --> 08:32.000]  It's pretty extensive.
[08:32.000 --> 08:40.000]  I looked up every method of laundering money I could find and asked for disclosure that
[08:40.000 --> 08:47.000]  would reveal those different methodologies for laundering money, but I didn't find them all.
[08:47.000 --> 08:51.000]  I used to know some real criminals they would have known how to do.
[08:51.000 --> 08:57.000]  They probably knew a lot of stuff I didn't, but all the professional criminals I know
[08:57.000 --> 09:03.000]  or used to know are either dead or in prison, so they weren't helpful.
[09:03.000 --> 09:08.000]  You want to talk to the professional criminal who's not in jail?
[09:08.000 --> 09:10.000]  I don't know anyone.
[09:10.000 --> 09:17.000]  I had one friend that made his living by sending invoices to corporations.
[09:17.000 --> 09:27.000]  He said at the time it was 40 years ago, if you send a $25 invoice to a company, it would
[09:27.000 --> 09:32.000]  cost them more to chase that invoice down than it would to just pay it.
[09:32.000 --> 09:33.000]  So they just pay it.
[09:33.000 --> 09:35.000]  They don't ever question it.
[09:35.000 --> 09:40.000]  And after they paid it a few times, the accounts payable gets it, they recognize that they
[09:40.000 --> 09:42.000]  just authorize it.
[09:42.000 --> 09:47.000]  He made $20,000 a month just by sending invoices.
[09:47.000 --> 09:52.000]  Sometimes they would catch it and then they'd just stop sending.
[09:52.000 --> 09:54.000]  But it's not criminal.
[09:54.000 --> 09:59.000]  If I send you an invoice and you pay it, there's nothing criminal about that.
[09:59.000 --> 10:04.000]  Even if you didn't owe me the money, it's a civil matter.
[10:04.000 --> 10:07.000]  So they got a lot of tricks.
[10:07.000 --> 10:13.000]  And this sounds like something where it's buried in one of those tricks I don't know about.
[10:13.000 --> 10:14.000]  Okay.
[10:14.000 --> 10:15.000]  Well, I'll keep looking.
[10:15.000 --> 10:17.000]  But I wanted you to let me go to the others.
[10:17.000 --> 10:22.000]  But could you put me in touch with John, the medical guy in New York?
[10:22.000 --> 10:26.000]  I spoke into him, but I can't find his email in my...
[10:26.000 --> 10:27.000]  Yes.
[10:27.000 --> 10:28.000]  Yes.
[10:28.000 --> 10:30.000]  Send me an email.
[10:30.000 --> 10:31.000]  Ask for an introduction.
[10:31.000 --> 10:32.000]  I'll send it to him.
[10:32.000 --> 10:40.000]  He just sent me an email on how to eliminate allergies with the diet.
[10:40.000 --> 10:43.000]  Well, I need to talk to him about a couple things.
[10:43.000 --> 10:44.000]  So that would be great.
[10:44.000 --> 10:45.000]  I will send you an email.
[10:45.000 --> 10:52.000]  And the lady who before wanted to know about transcripts, if she just Googled the cheapest
[10:52.000 --> 10:59.000]  way to transcribe a call or a recording, she'll find a ton of information.
[10:59.000 --> 11:04.000]  I just did it myself two minutes ago, and there's all these places that you can, you
[11:04.000 --> 11:07.000]  know, pay a nominal fee to get things transcribed if she wants.
[11:07.000 --> 11:12.000]  If she can't figure out the technology, and I'm a little technology challenge, so I understand
[11:12.000 --> 11:14.000]  it, but just pay someone to do it.
[11:14.000 --> 11:16.000]  It's not that much money.
[11:16.000 --> 11:17.000]  Yes.
[11:17.000 --> 11:18.000]  She may be a Luddite.
[11:18.000 --> 11:27.000]  We have a commercial on the network where the speaker says that she's a Luddite.
[11:27.000 --> 11:33.000]  I actually saw a article today, and it was called Luddite Lawyer.
[11:33.000 --> 11:35.000]  I looked up Luddite.
[11:35.000 --> 11:40.000]  Luddite means someone who is not technologically sophisticated.
[11:40.000 --> 11:43.000]  That's me.
[11:43.000 --> 11:47.000]  So you could be a Luddite.
[11:47.000 --> 11:49.000]  Tamar is a Luddite.
[11:49.000 --> 11:57.000]  She needs to find someone who's not, and the best option for that is a 10-year-old.
[11:57.000 --> 11:58.000]  Yes.
[11:58.000 --> 11:59.000]  Absolutely.
[11:59.000 --> 12:00.000]  Okay.
[12:00.000 --> 12:01.000]  Thank you.
[12:01.000 --> 12:04.000]  Thank you, Tina.
[12:04.000 --> 12:07.000]  Now we're going to go to Terrence in Florida.
[12:07.000 --> 12:08.000]  Hello, Terrence.
[12:08.000 --> 12:12.000]  What do you have for us today?
[12:12.000 --> 12:15.000]  Hey, Randy, can you hear me all right?
[12:15.000 --> 12:17.000]  I can hear you just fine.
[12:17.000 --> 12:19.000]  Okay.
[12:19.000 --> 12:26.000]  I sort of want to go back to your opening with the officer and how the way I hear he's
[12:26.000 --> 12:31.000]  saying is, shut up and be a good slave and let them do what they want.
[12:31.000 --> 12:32.000]  Don't go after them.
[12:32.000 --> 12:33.000]  Let's make a deal.
[12:33.000 --> 12:36.000]  And that's what they're doing to us, and we've got to stop making these deals.
[12:36.000 --> 12:40.000]  This guy's a bad guy, even one time.
[12:40.000 --> 12:43.000]  No, no, you missed it.
[12:43.000 --> 12:46.000]  You make a deal when you're dirty.
[12:46.000 --> 12:53.000]  These two, she had a preexisting warrant.
[12:53.000 --> 13:03.000]  She had charges against her for driving on a suspended license, multiple counts.
[13:03.000 --> 13:06.000]  These are legitimate charges that can get her put in jail.
[13:06.000 --> 13:15.000]  Even if she goes and says this stop was wrongful, you have to let me go and they let her go.
[13:15.000 --> 13:20.000]  Then they know they have a warrant against her.
[13:20.000 --> 13:21.000]  They know where she's at.
[13:21.000 --> 13:22.000]  They release her.
[13:22.000 --> 13:25.000]  Then they go right back and arrest her.
[13:25.000 --> 13:26.000]  Right.
[13:26.000 --> 13:29.000]  And she goes to jail.
[13:29.000 --> 13:32.000]  My first concern is liberty.
[13:32.000 --> 13:36.000]  You're not any good for the movement if you're in jail.
[13:36.000 --> 13:37.000]  Hang on.
[13:37.000 --> 13:39.000]  About to go to break.
[13:39.000 --> 13:41.000]  Oh, I did it again.
[13:41.000 --> 13:43.000]  We've got to go to our sponsors.
[13:43.000 --> 13:45.000]  I won't work.
[13:45.000 --> 13:47.000]  I won't have this die hard.
[13:47.000 --> 14:14.000]  We'll be right back.
[14:14.000 --> 14:21.000]  We'll be right back.
[14:44.000 --> 14:59.000]  We'll be right back.
[14:59.000 --> 15:25.000]  We'll be right back.
[15:25.000 --> 15:51.000]  We'll be right back.
[15:51.000 --> 16:17.000]  We'll be right back.
[16:17.000 --> 16:29.000]  We'll be right back.
[16:29.000 --> 16:30.000]  Okay.
[16:30.000 --> 16:31.000]  We are back.
[16:31.000 --> 16:32.000]  Randy Kelton.
[16:32.000 --> 16:33.000]  Brett Fountain.
[16:33.000 --> 16:35.000]  Rudolf Law Radio.
[16:35.000 --> 16:39.000]  And my fader's not fading.
[16:39.000 --> 16:41.000]  Brett, can you hear?
[16:41.000 --> 16:42.000]  Okay, it's faded.
[16:42.000 --> 16:47.000]  My producer screaming is a little slow for me today.
[16:47.000 --> 16:48.000]  Okay.
[16:48.000 --> 16:49.000]  Terrence.
[16:49.000 --> 16:50.000]  Terrence.
[16:50.000 --> 16:51.000]  Terrence.
[16:51.000 --> 16:52.000]  Terrence.
[16:52.000 --> 16:53.000]  Terrence.
[16:53.000 --> 16:56.000]  I understand your position.
[16:56.000 --> 17:04.000]  You're speaking to someone who has been standing on this soap box for 30 years.
[17:04.000 --> 17:09.000]  I've been fighting this battle a long time.
[17:09.000 --> 17:12.800]  And yes, I want to take that one.
[17:12.800 --> 17:26.000]  But people come to me for remedy, not necessarily for a purist, militaristic view of how to take
[17:26.000 --> 17:27.000]  on the system.
[17:27.000 --> 17:30.840]  Yeah, I know how to take on the system.
[17:30.840 --> 17:34.600]  But most people aren't as sophisticated as we are, you know.
[17:34.600 --> 17:38.640]  I'm hearing what you're saying and you fight these guys.
[17:38.640 --> 17:41.320]  They bet better at it.
[17:41.320 --> 17:48.080]  And you're likely like me to be in a position to where I can go to jail.
[17:48.080 --> 17:54.160]  I told the jury once, you know, if you feel like you have to do your worst, because at
[17:54.160 --> 17:57.600]  the end of the day, it's not going to make any difference.
[17:57.600 --> 18:01.720]  If I go to jail, when I get out, I'm still going to be here.
[18:01.720 --> 18:04.480]  And I'm meant, they threw the book at me.
[18:04.480 --> 18:10.440]  And after 27 days of solitary confinement, I was looking in a mirror and I said to myself,
[18:10.440 --> 18:17.120]  self, you told the jury, you got up on your high horse and told the jury that didn't matter
[18:17.120 --> 18:22.720]  what they do, that you'd still be here and they threw the book at you.
[18:22.720 --> 18:25.040]  Did you mean it?
[18:25.040 --> 18:31.480]  And I looked in that stainless steel mirror and I said, yes, I did.
[18:31.480 --> 18:37.960]  And for me, that was great, but then I have a daughter who's a CPA.
[18:37.960 --> 18:41.560]  I have a son who has his PhD.
[18:41.560 --> 18:43.080]  They are well-grown.
[18:43.080 --> 18:47.240]  I have fulfilled my contract with life.
[18:47.240 --> 18:54.280]  No one's depending on me for their income or their roof over their head.
[18:54.280 --> 18:57.720]  I can do what I want to.
[18:57.720 --> 19:07.640]  I can't tell someone who has responsibilities to fight my fight and risk going to jail for
[19:07.640 --> 19:08.640]  it.
[19:08.640 --> 19:09.640]  Does that make sense, Terence?
[19:09.640 --> 19:10.640]  Yeah.
[19:10.640 --> 19:17.840]  And you did point out a few circumstances that I didn't know about as far as the ladies
[19:17.840 --> 19:22.200]  tradition, all together as the whole scheme of things.
[19:22.200 --> 19:23.200]  Yeah.
[19:23.200 --> 19:28.680]  But I do tell people, the best fight to have is the one you picked, because when you pick
[19:28.680 --> 19:32.680]  the fight, your liberty's not at risk.
[19:32.680 --> 19:38.440]  You can go in there and just work them over with impunity.
[19:38.440 --> 19:44.240]  But I get people calling in and they're asking me for help and I'm always conflicted that
[19:44.240 --> 19:45.240]  way.
[19:45.240 --> 19:49.680]  I've had people call in that terrified me.
[19:49.680 --> 19:55.360]  A couple of people, I had to get them to stop, do not talk about this on the air and had
[19:55.360 --> 20:02.360]  to talk about it off the air and I warned them, yes, what these people are doing is
[20:02.360 --> 20:07.520]  wrong, but you could die over this.
[20:07.520 --> 20:13.320]  If you die over this, you will be no help to the legal reform community.
[20:13.320 --> 20:18.040]  You need to find a way to do this that won't get you in prison for the rest of your life
[20:18.040 --> 20:19.600]  or wind up dying over it.
[20:19.600 --> 20:28.760]  However, there were a few years ago, these people were filing liens against public officials.
[20:28.760 --> 20:32.480]  That was a big way to get after them and I never liked that idea.
[20:32.480 --> 20:35.200]  This is dangerous stuff.
[20:35.200 --> 20:40.920]  Robert Fox, when he was alive, called me and I was in North Carolina at the time.
[20:40.920 --> 20:49.240]  We had two guys on the phone who were being prosecuted by the feds for filing false liens.
[20:49.240 --> 20:54.040]  I said, well, who did you file the liens against?
[20:54.040 --> 20:56.320]  A justice of the peace.
[20:56.320 --> 21:00.480]  Well, what was the issue?
[21:00.480 --> 21:01.480]  Traffic.
[21:01.480 --> 21:06.040]  Well, how much were the liens?
[21:06.040 --> 21:10.560]  11 trillion.
[21:10.560 --> 21:14.520]  What were you thinking?
[21:14.520 --> 21:20.840]  Do you really think that these people are just going to lay down and roll over and let
[21:20.840 --> 21:24.200]  you ruin their lives?
[21:24.200 --> 21:26.000]  And they asked me what I thought.
[21:26.000 --> 21:27.680]  I said, oh, you guys are going to win.
[21:27.680 --> 21:28.680]  So we are.
[21:28.680 --> 21:30.960]  Oh, yeah, you'll win.
[21:30.960 --> 21:33.800]  The feds are coming after them.
[21:33.800 --> 21:40.200]  You will spend probably two or three years in federal lockup being diesel around the
[21:40.200 --> 21:46.200]  country where your family and anyone who knows you can't find you, you'll lose your house,
[21:46.200 --> 21:54.000]  you lose your family, you lose everything, then the feds will drop the whole thing.
[21:54.000 --> 21:56.960]  Good luck.
[21:56.960 --> 22:03.040]  Point is, pick your fights really careful and make sure when you pick that fight, you're
[22:03.040 --> 22:06.400]  in a position to fight that fight.
[22:06.400 --> 22:15.360]  So that's, that was why I did the first part of this program, the way I did to get people
[22:15.360 --> 22:19.040]  to be real careful about the fights they pick.
[22:19.040 --> 22:27.040]  Do not get in a fight simply because you're angry and you feel mistreated.
[22:27.040 --> 22:29.280]  Tamara.
[22:29.280 --> 22:31.560]  Tamara was a perfect example.
[22:31.560 --> 22:35.240]  She felt mistreated by the system and she certainly was.
[22:35.240 --> 22:40.120]  What she's saying is all absolutely valid.
[22:40.120 --> 22:46.240]  She was horribly mistreated, but she wasn't mistreated by the system this time.
[22:46.240 --> 22:53.720]  She was mistreated by somebody who improperly invoked the system against her.
[22:53.720 --> 23:02.040]  So we got to pick our fights real careful if she goes in and starts a fight with a prosecutor.
[23:02.040 --> 23:08.680]  She's likely to go to prison for a long time, not because she's guilty, but because she
[23:08.680 --> 23:16.280]  got the prosecutor to dig his heels here and not listen to reason.
[23:16.280 --> 23:23.720]  So that's why I advised her first, clear this liberty issue, get that dropped.
[23:23.720 --> 23:29.800]  Now if you want to go back and claim that you were improperly arrested, claim you were
[23:29.800 --> 23:38.040]  improperly arrested, but make the claim against the right individual, the policeman who arrested
[23:38.040 --> 23:42.680]  you did nothing wrong unless you beat you up or some other stuff.
[23:42.680 --> 23:48.240]  It was the guy who improperly sent him out there is the one you need to go after.
[23:48.240 --> 23:50.240]  Am I making sense, Terrence?
[23:50.240 --> 23:51.240]  Yes, you are.
[23:51.240 --> 23:52.240]  And I do have a question.
[23:52.240 --> 24:01.120]  What I'm wanting to know is that I can't sort of grab my head around is, and I'll give
[24:01.120 --> 24:06.280]  an example, what are facts?
[24:06.280 --> 24:14.480]  So I got a police officer on the stand and he says I was speeding and the traffic code
[24:14.480 --> 24:15.480]  applies to me.
[24:15.480 --> 24:24.280]  I would ask him, what facts do you rely on that prove the code applies to me?
[24:24.280 --> 24:26.720]  And my question is, what are facts?
[24:26.720 --> 24:34.040]  Facts aren't accusations, they've got to be something that are backed up by evidence.
[24:34.040 --> 24:35.040]  So...
[24:35.040 --> 24:36.040]  Yeah.
[24:36.040 --> 24:45.480]  It's stating that you violated a law as a conclusion, it is not the officer's place
[24:45.480 --> 24:48.480]  to state that you violated a law.
[24:48.480 --> 24:54.840]  The officer can state that I observed the individual operating a motor vehicle, they'll
[24:54.840 --> 25:04.920]  say motor vehicle instead of conveyance, at a speed in excess of the posted speed limit.
[25:04.920 --> 25:16.600]  Because of facts, that the operating a vehicle in excess of the posted speed limit is a crime
[25:16.600 --> 25:24.240]  is a opinion of the officer.
[25:24.240 --> 25:29.280]  He can't state that, he can just state what he observed.
[25:29.280 --> 25:38.920]  Okay, but I'm not sure how to answer your question beyond that.
[25:38.920 --> 25:50.080]  When I produce documents, I have a whole methodology for how to do facts.
[25:50.080 --> 25:56.960]  In fact you have no opinion, this happened, this happened, this happened.
[25:56.960 --> 26:01.320]  But a statement of facts is an art form.
[26:01.320 --> 26:10.360]  First you determine, you figure out what determination you want the person to make,
[26:10.360 --> 26:19.720]  what evaluation you want them to come to based on the facts, and then to pick the facts so
[26:19.720 --> 26:25.480]  that a reasonable person of ordinary prudence in reading these facts will try to stitch
[26:25.480 --> 26:29.480]  them together in a way that makes sense.
[26:29.480 --> 26:35.000]  So you pick the facts that would lead an ordinary person of reasonable prudence to stitch these
[26:35.000 --> 26:40.160]  facts together and come to the conclusion you want them to come to.
[26:40.160 --> 26:46.240]  And then after you've done the statement of facts, then you do an argument in support
[26:46.240 --> 26:52.600]  and you make the connections you've already enticed your reader to make in their own mind.
[26:52.600 --> 26:59.600]  Hang on, got to go to our sponsors, we'll be right back.
[26:59.600 --> 27:04.440]  Shhh, keep your voice down.
[27:04.440 --> 27:09.560]  The government now has Russian technology that matches identities to voices so it can
[27:09.560 --> 27:11.360]  tell who's doing the talking.
[27:11.360 --> 27:16.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back to tell you how it works after this.
[27:16.240 --> 27:17.960]  Privacy is under attack.
[27:17.960 --> 27:21.560]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[27:21.560 --> 27:26.560]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[27:26.560 --> 27:31.800]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[27:31.800 --> 27:34.320]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[27:34.320 --> 27:39.960]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[27:39.960 --> 27:41.640]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[27:41.640 --> 27:45.400]  Start over with StartPage.
[27:45.400 --> 27:50.160]  Since 2001, when the Patriot Act opened the doors to electronic surveillance, Big Brother
[27:50.160 --> 27:53.760]  has gone crazy, vacuuming up all of our data.
[27:53.760 --> 27:58.680]  Now it has a new tactic, courtesy of our former communist allies, the Russians.
[27:58.680 --> 28:04.040]  It's called voice grid nation, and it analyzes and identifies voices, courtesy of Russia's
[28:04.040 --> 28:05.920]  Speech Technology Center.
[28:05.920 --> 28:10.680]  When authorities intercept a call, the speaker's voice is compared to millions of others, like
[28:10.680 --> 28:11.680]  a fingerprint.
[28:11.680 --> 28:13.840]  How long does it take for a match?
[28:13.840 --> 28:15.080]  Three seconds.
[28:15.080 --> 28:17.720]  So watch what you say on the phone, comrades.
[28:17.720 --> 28:21.160]  Whether you say your name or not, Big Brother may know who's talking.
[28:21.160 --> 28:30.760]  I'm Dr. Kaepernald Brecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[28:30.760 --> 28:31.760]  I lost my son.
[28:31.760 --> 28:32.760]  My nephew.
[28:32.760 --> 28:33.760]  My uncle.
[28:33.760 --> 28:34.760]  My son.
[28:34.760 --> 28:35.760]  On September 11, 2001.
[28:35.760 --> 28:39.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[28:39.000 --> 28:43.080]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[28:43.080 --> 28:47.000]  Oh, will the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7?
[28:47.000 --> 28:51.840]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more
[28:51.840 --> 28:52.840]  to the story.
[28:52.840 --> 28:54.200]  Bring justice to my son.
[28:54.200 --> 28:55.200]  My uncle.
[28:55.200 --> 28:56.200]  My nephew.
[28:56.200 --> 28:57.200]  My son.
[28:57.200 --> 28:58.200]  Go to building what.org.
[28:58.200 --> 29:01.360]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[29:01.360 --> 29:06.040]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[29:06.040 --> 29:12.280]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8 from 8 to 10 p.m. central time.
[29:12.280 --> 29:15.360]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516.
[29:15.360 --> 29:20.400]  Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father
[29:20.400 --> 29:21.960]  which is in heaven.
[29:21.960 --> 29:26.840]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[29:26.840 --> 29:32.320]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed
[29:32.320 --> 29:35.440]  to provoke unto love and good works.
[29:35.440 --> 29:39.840]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss
[29:39.840 --> 29:41.600]  one chapter per week.
[29:41.600 --> 29:46.680]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as
[29:46.680 --> 29:48.880]  Christian character development.
[29:48.880 --> 29:55.960]  So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting
[29:55.960 --> 30:02.440]  January 8 for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[30:02.440 --> 30:19.080]  Live Free Speech Radio LogosRadioNetwork.com
[30:19.080 --> 30:48.920]  Yeah, yeah, oh, yeah, I won't, oh, I won't, I won't let you pull the wool over my eye.
[30:48.920 --> 31:07.960]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rood of Law Radio, and on the break, Brett
[31:07.960 --> 31:14.600]  and I were talking about how do I describe what a fact is?
[31:14.600 --> 31:21.400]  And I was talking about predicates, participles, and nominalizations, and Brett assured me
[31:21.400 --> 31:28.920]  that if I started talking about that, everybody would fall asleep, so I'm not gonna go there.
[31:28.920 --> 31:33.280]  Adverbs.
[31:33.280 --> 31:36.120]  Use no adverbs.
[31:36.120 --> 31:48.160]  The officer did this annoyingly, annoyingly as an adverb that describes this, leave the
[31:48.160 --> 32:01.120]  adverb out, leave the descriptive words out, speak to what actually occurred, but no descriptions
[32:01.120 --> 32:03.720]  of how it occurred.
[32:03.720 --> 32:10.480]  So you can say things like, you wouldn't say, the man approached my vehicle with a God complex.
[32:10.480 --> 32:11.480]  Yes.
[32:11.480 --> 32:17.760]  You wouldn't do that, because that with a God complex part, it might have been absolutely
[32:17.760 --> 32:20.600]  true, but you can't prove it like that.
[32:20.600 --> 32:28.000]  Instead, you can say, the man approached my vehicle yelling at me, or you could say,
[32:28.000 --> 32:34.400]  his demeanor was, no, even if you talk about a demeanor, that's even kind of subjective.
[32:34.400 --> 32:42.720]  You talk about things that are objectively provable, and you don't put in descriptions
[32:42.720 --> 32:48.520]  of things that would have to go be, you'd have to either look it up, and find out what
[32:48.520 --> 32:56.080]  that word means in the law, anything that's conclusive, leave those out.
[32:56.080 --> 33:00.600]  Terrence, is that making sense?
[33:00.600 --> 33:04.640]  Let me try to paint a picture here and ask a question.
[33:04.640 --> 33:12.120]  So a cop would say, I observed a blue automobile going through the intersection of Maple and
[33:12.120 --> 33:21.080]  Leak Lane heading north on Maple, with a posted speed image sign of 35 mph, and I observed
[33:21.080 --> 33:31.720]  the blue automobile doing 45, but pulled over the automobile and issued Terrence a citation
[33:31.720 --> 33:35.480]  according to the traffic code for exceeding the speed limit.
[33:35.480 --> 33:44.240]  Now my question after that statement would be, what facts do you rely on that prove that
[33:44.240 --> 33:48.720]  traffic code applies to me?
[33:48.720 --> 33:52.840]  How could he answer that?
[33:52.840 --> 34:02.680]  He could say, article so and so of certain code authorizes officers with my qualifications
[34:02.680 --> 34:07.320]  to enforce transportation code.
[34:07.320 --> 34:11.080]  In Tennessee, I could quote exactly the statute.
[34:11.080 --> 34:20.640]  In Georgia, in Tennessee, Georgia, New Mexico that I know of, has a specific statute that
[34:20.640 --> 34:26.400]  authorizes any peace officer to enforce the transportation code.
[34:26.400 --> 34:30.440]  Okay, Randy, stop, don't go on.
[34:30.440 --> 34:37.440]  What facts does the officer rely on that prove that code applies to me?
[34:37.440 --> 34:44.160]  Okay, there's a code, how is he going to find it to be, how is he enforcing it on me?
[34:44.160 --> 34:45.720]  What facts does he rely on?
[34:45.720 --> 34:56.120]  Well, for example, he could say, this automobile was bearing hazardous materials placards,
[34:56.120 --> 35:02.680]  and that would be something that he could add it together with another fact, like any
[35:02.680 --> 35:05.680]  vehicle with a hazardous material placard.
[35:05.680 --> 35:06.680]  I'm sorry?
[35:06.680 --> 35:09.240]  Go ahead.
[35:09.240 --> 35:18.680]  I observe this vehicle which displayed a license plate.
[35:18.680 --> 35:28.160]  A license plate is necessarily a contractual agreement with the state that authorizes this
[35:28.160 --> 35:34.080]  vehicle to be operated in commerce.
[35:34.080 --> 35:42.880]  And as much as the operator of the vehicle elected to enter into a commercial contract
[35:42.880 --> 35:49.680]  with the state to operate in commerce, that gives me reasonable, probable cause to believe
[35:49.680 --> 35:52.760]  that they are operating it on purpose.
[35:52.760 --> 35:59.360]  Okay, good answer, I like that.
[35:59.360 --> 36:12.560]  Now, would he have to prove from there that he was actually operating in commerce?
[36:12.560 --> 36:17.400]  Absolutely the right question.
[36:17.400 --> 36:25.760]  Once the officer sees your vehicle and it displays a commercial license plate, now he
[36:25.760 --> 36:36.400]  has to consider, can this vehicle be operated in a manner that does not fall within the
[36:36.400 --> 36:42.880]  commercial license jurisdiction?
[36:42.880 --> 36:44.760]  The answer is absolutely it can.
[36:44.760 --> 36:53.400]  So first, he can pull you over based on the fact that you displayed his commercial license
[36:53.400 --> 37:03.000]  plate and if he asks you for a driver's license and you have one, you have contractually agreed
[37:03.000 --> 37:06.160]  to present that on demand.
[37:06.160 --> 37:12.840]  So if you then present him the commercial driver's license, that merely establishes that you are
[37:12.840 --> 37:19.600]  authorized to operate in commerce, but that does not give him any reason to believe that
[37:19.600 --> 37:23.760]  you actually are operating in commerce.
[37:23.760 --> 37:29.040]  So Uterus, what's the first question he must ask?
[37:29.040 --> 37:38.240]  That was my question, what facts do you rely on that prove the code applies to be in this
[37:38.240 --> 37:39.240]  instance?
[37:39.240 --> 37:40.240]  Yeah.
[37:40.240 --> 37:57.080]  Are you transporting persons or commodities or products for hire?
[37:57.080 --> 38:01.080]  That's the next question.
[38:01.080 --> 38:13.680]  And you do say, no, I'm deadheading, they all know exactly what that means.
[38:13.680 --> 38:20.160]  But yeah, the next question would have to be a question to determine whether or not you
[38:20.160 --> 38:24.680]  were actually operating in commerce.
[38:24.680 --> 38:35.000]  And the officer would have to have the facts, now I'm guessing the facts would be the elements
[38:35.000 --> 38:38.360]  of commerce.
[38:38.360 --> 38:47.760]  Exactly that has to be the first element, well the first element would be that you displayed
[38:47.760 --> 38:56.320]  a license plate or a driver's license that indicated a commercial agreement with the
[38:56.320 --> 38:57.320]  state.
[38:57.320 --> 39:04.400]  The second would have to indeed demonstrate that you were not deadheading, that you were
[39:04.400 --> 39:07.520]  actually operating in commerce.
[39:07.520 --> 39:13.600]  We get past that one and then we get to this beating statute.
[39:13.600 --> 39:26.640]  But if it's like Texas, the transportation code states that license of his speed limit
[39:26.640 --> 39:32.840]  signs only apply to commercial traffic.
[39:32.840 --> 39:41.520]  So if he's established commercial traffic, now he has to establish that even though you
[39:41.520 --> 39:50.320]  were exceeding the posted speed limit, that in itself is not a crime.
[39:50.320 --> 39:57.200]  The posted speed limit is only a prima facie of safe speed.
[39:57.200 --> 40:04.760]  The officer under Texas law would then have to demonstrate that there were circumstances
[40:04.760 --> 40:17.120]  that rendered the presumed safe speed as the fastest safe speed that could be traveled.
[40:17.120 --> 40:25.760]  He would have to say there was heavy traffic, there were environmental conditions, slick
[40:25.760 --> 40:34.320]  road surface, damaged road surface, rain, snow, flood, something to show that operating
[40:34.320 --> 40:43.600]  at the posted speed or above the posted speed created an unreasonable hazard.
[40:43.600 --> 40:49.080]  Hang on, about to go to sponsors, tell my city there, don't you dare hang up.
[40:49.080 --> 40:59.600]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rilla Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[40:59.600 --> 41:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[41:04.880 --> 41:08.440]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[41:08.440 --> 41:12.760]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[41:12.760 --> 41:13.760]  can win two.
[41:13.760 --> 41:18.640]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[41:18.640 --> 41:24.320]  civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[41:24.320 --> 41:28.960]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[41:28.960 --> 41:33.200]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[41:33.200 --> 41:38.320]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[41:38.320 --> 41:40.320]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[41:40.320 --> 41:46.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[41:46.000 --> 41:48.960]  or email michaelmearris at yahoo.com.
[41:48.960 --> 41:56.680]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[41:56.680 --> 42:03.520]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now, are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[42:03.520 --> 42:10.280]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[42:10.280 --> 42:13.280]  that will show you how, in 24 hours, you step-by-step.
[42:13.280 --> 42:18.480]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[42:18.480 --> 42:22.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[42:22.120 --> 42:27.160]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[42:27.160 --> 42:33.760]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[42:33.760 --> 42:38.320]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[42:38.320 --> 42:42.640]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[42:42.640 --> 42:48.800]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[42:48.800 --> 42:55.640]  prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[42:55.640 --> 43:23.640]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[43:23.640 --> 43:30.640]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, and much more.
[43:53.640 --> 44:00.640]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, and much more.
[44:23.640 --> 44:28.640]  Okay.
[44:28.640 --> 44:29.640]  We are back.
[44:29.640 --> 44:35.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and a little late coming back from
[44:35.000 --> 44:41.440]  break, but Brett and I were talking about some transformational grammar issues, and
[44:41.440 --> 44:44.240]  I still got a headache from it.
[44:44.240 --> 44:45.240]  Okay.
[44:45.240 --> 44:46.240]  Terrence?
[44:46.240 --> 44:47.240]  Yes.
[44:47.240 --> 44:50.640]  Are we making any sense?
[44:50.640 --> 44:58.360]  Yes, we are because I'm trying to figure out the facts and how to actually put that question
[44:58.360 --> 44:59.360]  to the accuser.
[44:59.360 --> 45:04.080]  It's like when dealing with the IRS, you get on the phone with some imbecile that doesn't
[45:04.080 --> 45:09.280]  know anything except you've been trained to believe that all persons need every flesh
[45:09.280 --> 45:15.640]  and blood man on the face of the earth, and wages being their paycheck, or of course the
[45:15.640 --> 45:16.640]  same things that come.
[45:16.640 --> 45:21.640]  And they have no idea what they're talking about, that they're accusing you of doing
[45:21.640 --> 45:24.640]  something wrong, but they have no facts or evidence.
[45:24.640 --> 45:25.640]  Wait a minute.
[45:25.640 --> 45:26.640]  Hold on.
[45:26.640 --> 45:32.640]  We're getting some kind of feedback or echo.
[45:32.640 --> 45:39.640]  Are you using a headset or a Bluetooth?
[45:39.640 --> 45:45.640]  I'm using a tractor trailer, so maybe it's bad that I sound wrong.
[45:45.640 --> 45:46.640]  Okay.
[45:46.640 --> 45:49.640]  It's probably the diesel fumes.
[45:49.640 --> 45:50.640]  Yeah.
[45:50.640 --> 45:52.640]  Do I sound okay?
[45:52.640 --> 45:58.640]  You know that diesel fumes have been shown to cause deadheading.
[45:58.640 --> 45:59.640]  Yes.
[45:59.640 --> 46:00.640]  Okay.
[46:00.640 --> 46:03.640]  Enough of the truck driver jokes.
[46:03.640 --> 46:04.640]  Okay.
[46:04.640 --> 46:05.640]  Go ahead.
[46:05.640 --> 46:07.640]  But do I sound okay now?
[46:07.640 --> 46:08.640]  Yes.
[46:08.640 --> 46:17.640]  Well, what I'm saying is that I have this currently with the IRS, and I'll get some guy on the
[46:17.640 --> 46:21.640]  phone that doesn't know anything about anything.
[46:21.640 --> 46:25.640]  But he's been trained to believe that words mean things.
[46:25.640 --> 46:28.640]  But he has no facts or evidence to prove what he's saying is true.
[46:28.640 --> 46:29.640]  He's just making accusations.
[46:29.640 --> 46:36.640]  And I'm trying to get beyond this imbecile to somebody that can actually make a decision
[46:36.640 --> 46:38.640]  that has some kind of authority.
[46:38.640 --> 46:40.640]  And it's next to him.
[46:40.640 --> 46:41.640]  And it's the same thing.
[46:41.640 --> 46:52.640]  I have a suggestion that you notify the person you're talking to that for where they say
[46:52.640 --> 46:59.640]  it's for, for what reasons this call is being recorded.
[46:59.640 --> 47:02.640]  Quick.
[47:02.640 --> 47:06.640]  You'll get that real fast.
[47:06.640 --> 47:11.640]  Well, but if I call them, I don't want them to do that.
[47:11.640 --> 47:14.640]  I'm trying to arrest their behavior and actually get.
[47:14.640 --> 47:15.640]  Oh, wait.
[47:15.640 --> 47:16.640]  Okay.
[47:16.640 --> 47:17.640]  Hold on.
[47:17.640 --> 47:18.640]  Hold on.
[47:18.640 --> 47:20.640]  That's okay.
[47:20.640 --> 47:28.140]  Because if you're dealing with the IRS, first thing you want to do is go online and find
[47:28.140 --> 47:29.640]  the IRS manual.
[47:29.640 --> 47:38.640]  And it will tell you how these agents are required to deal with you.
[47:38.640 --> 47:45.640]  And it will show you the hierarchy in, in the IRS.
[47:45.640 --> 47:50.640]  We had a guy in Florida that the IRS was after.
[47:50.640 --> 47:52.640]  He picked a fight with them.
[47:52.640 --> 47:53.640]  They couldn't get to him.
[47:53.640 --> 47:57.640]  He had a friend who had a chiropractic clinic.
[47:57.640 --> 48:06.640]  Since they couldn't get to the guy they were after, they raided the chiropractic clinic.
[48:06.640 --> 48:13.640]  They came into the clinic with guns in their hands and pointed an automatic weapon in the
[48:13.640 --> 48:17.640]  face of the receptionist.
[48:17.640 --> 48:23.640]  They pointed automatic weapons at a nurse who had a guy in a rack that stretched his spine
[48:23.640 --> 48:28.640]  and ordered him her to remove it, and she told him to go scratch.
[48:28.640 --> 48:33.640]  And they threatened to arrest her and she told him knock stuff out, but I'm not taking
[48:33.640 --> 48:34.640]  him out of this machine.
[48:34.640 --> 48:36.640]  He has to be let down.
[48:36.640 --> 48:38.640]  Gradually, we'll injure him.
[48:38.640 --> 48:40.640]  And she stood up to him.
[48:40.640 --> 48:41.640]  So they came to us.
[48:41.640 --> 48:48.640]  We got out the manual and found the highest level guy who had to approve a raid.
[48:48.640 --> 48:58.640]  And what the manual said about a raid is the only time an IRS agent can draw his weapon
[48:58.640 --> 49:04.640]  is if he has grounds to draw and discharge.
[49:04.640 --> 49:11.640]  So we went up the chain as high as we could to the highest level person who could authorize
[49:11.640 --> 49:21.640]  a physical raid on a business establishment and charged him with aggravated assault.
[49:21.640 --> 49:24.640]  We filed it with the U.S. attorney.
[49:24.640 --> 49:31.640]  The U.S. attorney called me and told me that if I attempted, well, I actually filed it with
[49:31.640 --> 49:35.640]  the U.S. grand jury at the U.S. attorney's office.
[49:35.640 --> 49:40.640]  He called me and told me that if I attempted to get to the grand jury again, he would have
[49:40.640 --> 49:44.640]  arrested and charged me with jury tampering.
[49:44.640 --> 49:47.640]  I told him, knock yourself out.
[49:47.640 --> 49:50.640]  You charge me a jury tampering.
[49:50.640 --> 49:53.640]  I'll charge you with official oppression and retaliation.
[49:53.640 --> 49:56.640]  And we'll see how this works out for you.
[49:56.640 --> 50:02.640]  They fired the IRS agent the next day.
[50:02.640 --> 50:03.640]  Get the manual.
[50:03.640 --> 50:08.640]  Find out what that agent is supposed to do.
[50:08.640 --> 50:17.640]  Then go up as high in the IRS as you can and accuse the highest level supervisor you can
[50:17.640 --> 50:23.640]  find as respondee at superior and charge him with what the agent does.
[50:23.640 --> 50:27.640]  Then get this fixed real fast.
[50:27.640 --> 50:28.640]  Thank you, Randy.
[50:28.640 --> 50:29.640]  That's back to the evidence.
[50:29.640 --> 50:31.640]  I'm starting to catch on.
[50:31.640 --> 50:33.640]  Thank you very much.
[50:33.640 --> 50:34.640]  Okay.
[50:34.640 --> 50:35.640]  You are welcome, parents.
[50:35.640 --> 50:38.640]  Okay, now we're going to Tim in Texas.
[50:38.640 --> 50:39.640]  Hello, Tim.
[50:39.640 --> 50:40.640]  Hello, sir.
[50:40.640 --> 50:41.640]  How are you?
[50:41.640 --> 50:43.640]  What do you have for us today?
[50:43.640 --> 50:50.640]  Oh, I just got a bunch of questions about law, about procedure, due process, things like
[50:50.640 --> 50:51.640]  that.
[50:51.640 --> 50:52.640]  Okay.
[50:52.640 --> 50:57.640]  Well, don't you have some crowing to do as well with your sons?
[50:57.640 --> 50:59.640]  Oh, yeah.
[50:59.640 --> 51:04.640]  Jayden got the highest score in Bible quizzing last weekend.
[51:04.640 --> 51:05.640]  He was real nervous.
[51:05.640 --> 51:06.640]  He didn't want to do it.
[51:06.640 --> 51:12.640]  He didn't want to study for it, but when he did, he blew everybody out of the water.
[51:12.640 --> 51:20.640]  Then tonight, he went out of town with a friend of mine, and he got the highest score tonight
[51:20.640 --> 51:21.640]  in one.
[51:21.640 --> 51:24.640]  I guess they got two or three more.
[51:24.640 --> 51:31.440]  They just rememberize a bunch of scripture, and then they have to, when they ask a question,
[51:31.440 --> 51:36.440]  they have to hit a buzzer and be the first to answer, and they have to answer it correctly.
[51:36.440 --> 51:40.240]  So they're doing pretty good at that.
[51:40.240 --> 51:44.440]  So they got their smarts from you?
[51:44.440 --> 51:45.440]  No.
[51:45.440 --> 51:46.440]  No.
[51:46.440 --> 51:47.440]  No.
[51:47.440 --> 51:48.440]  Their mother.
[51:48.440 --> 51:49.440]  Here's mine.
[51:49.440 --> 51:50.440]  No.
[51:50.440 --> 51:51.440]  No.
[51:51.440 --> 51:52.440]  No.
[51:52.440 --> 51:53.440]  No.
[51:53.440 --> 51:54.440]  No.
[51:54.440 --> 51:55.440]  No.
[51:55.440 --> 51:56.440]  I know Laura.
[51:56.440 --> 51:57.440]  Laura's still got hers.
[51:57.440 --> 52:02.440]  What a jumpy walk right into that one.
[52:02.440 --> 52:05.440]  Well, congratulations.
[52:05.440 --> 52:07.440]  Tim, congratulations.
[52:07.440 --> 52:14.440]  Well, you know, when you have what I have this ADD, I can actually sit there and read.
[52:14.440 --> 52:22.440]  I can read fast, but I'll start thinking of something else while I'm reading.
[52:22.440 --> 52:27.440]  So my attention, I guess they call it attention deficit disorder.
[52:27.440 --> 52:28.440]  I don't know.
[52:28.440 --> 52:29.440]  No.
[52:29.440 --> 52:30.440]  No.
[52:30.440 --> 52:31.440]  No.
[52:31.440 --> 52:32.440]  Everybody does that, Tim.
[52:32.440 --> 52:33.440]  Do you speed read?
[52:33.440 --> 52:34.440]  Yeah.
[52:34.440 --> 52:37.440]  Oh, you're talking about just speed.
[52:37.440 --> 52:40.440]  Speed reads is special technique.
[52:40.440 --> 52:44.440]  Try to double your reading speed.
[52:44.440 --> 52:51.440]  Instead of looking at a word, look at change your focus so you can see two words at once.
[52:51.440 --> 52:52.440]  Yeah.
[52:52.440 --> 52:55.440]  Well, that'll double your reading speed.
[52:55.440 --> 52:59.440]  But it also engages your mind in a way.
[52:59.440 --> 53:02.440]  Your mind is so much faster than your eyes.
[53:02.440 --> 53:03.440]  Yeah.
[53:03.440 --> 53:08.440]  You read a word and your brain gets it so quick that by the time you can get to the next word,
[53:08.440 --> 53:11.440]  you're getting bored and your brain drifts off.
[53:11.440 --> 53:18.440]  The faster you read, the more engaged it is and the less your mind drifts.
[53:18.440 --> 53:22.440]  I've probably read a thousand books.
[53:22.440 --> 53:25.440]  I still do the same thing.
[53:25.440 --> 53:30.440]  If you're reading and you're drifting, it's not you.
[53:30.440 --> 53:32.440]  It's the writing.
[53:32.440 --> 53:33.440]  Yeah.
[53:33.440 --> 53:35.440]  It didn't write though.
[53:35.440 --> 53:37.440]  If someone writes well.
[53:37.440 --> 53:45.440]  You know, my legal 101 book, there's a section in there on mental flow.
[53:45.440 --> 53:52.440]  And that whole section is about how to engage the mind of your reader.
[53:52.440 --> 53:57.440]  How to move from one thing to another.
[53:57.440 --> 54:00.440]  There are a lot of tricks in there we can use.
[54:00.440 --> 54:06.440]  Ask a question or make a statement that creates a question in the mind of your reader.
[54:06.440 --> 54:10.440]  Then answer that question.
[54:10.440 --> 54:17.440]  If the reader formulates a question in his mind and the writer answers that question immediately,
[54:17.440 --> 54:25.440]  then the reader gets the impression that you understand the reader and that gives rapport.
[54:25.440 --> 54:32.440]  I think all of us have had the experience of reading something and just falling into the content.
[54:32.440 --> 54:37.440]  And then 30 minutes or an hour later, we kind of come to.
[54:37.440 --> 54:46.440]  That's someone who is really a professional at guiding the mind of his reader.
[54:46.440 --> 54:51.440]  If you're reading and you're getting bored and you're drifting off, that's not you.
[54:51.440 --> 54:54.440]  That just means your mind is quick and it's faster.
[54:54.440 --> 54:58.440]  And whoever wrote this didn't do as good a job as they could.
[54:58.440 --> 55:02.440]  So judges don't write very well?
[55:02.440 --> 55:04.440]  Generally not.
[55:04.440 --> 55:09.440]  In judicial opinions, this is really technical stuff.
[55:09.440 --> 55:16.440]  And judges presume that their readers are just doctorates.
[55:16.440 --> 55:18.440]  So they tend not to write for us.
[55:18.440 --> 55:22.440]  So they use words in there that aren't clear to us what they mean.
[55:22.440 --> 55:26.440]  And then that distracts us and we drop out of flow.
[55:26.440 --> 55:32.440]  So it's hard to stay in mental flow when you're reading really complex stuff.
[55:32.440 --> 55:36.440]  It's not ADD. All of us do that.
[55:36.440 --> 55:40.440]  Hang on. God almost said it.
[55:40.440 --> 55:42.440]  Go into our sponsors.
[55:42.440 --> 56:11.440]  We'll be right back.
[56:12.440 --> 56:17.440]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[56:17.440 --> 56:23.440]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[56:23.440 --> 56:27.440]  growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[56:27.440 --> 56:32.440]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[56:32.440 --> 56:43.440]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[56:43.440 --> 56:51.440]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[56:51.440 --> 56:59.440]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[56:59.440 --> 57:04.440]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[57:29.440 --> 57:36.440]  In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb,
[57:36.440 --> 57:42.440]  was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[57:42.440 --> 57:44.440]  killing 10 and injuring 40.
[57:44.440 --> 57:51.440]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb,
[57:51.440 --> 57:57.440]  was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[57:57.440 --> 57:59.440]  killing 10 and injuring 40.
[57:59.440 --> 58:04.440]  Today in history.
[58:04.440 --> 58:05.440]  And recent news.
[58:05.440 --> 58:10.440]  Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing hemp and attacks his law back in June,
[58:10.440 --> 58:14.440]  county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio,
[58:14.440 --> 58:18.440]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones,
[58:18.440 --> 58:24.440]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC.
[58:24.440 --> 58:28.440]  Furthermore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this month that she was dismissing
[58:28.440 --> 58:32.440]  32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[58:32.440 --> 58:36.440]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[58:36.440 --> 58:41.440]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas
[58:41.440 --> 58:47.440]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works,
[58:47.440 --> 58:50.440]  as well as other cities too, like the District Attorney.
[58:50.440 --> 58:56.440]  In El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law,
[58:56.440 --> 59:00.440]  quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[59:00.440 --> 59:04.440]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball,
[59:04.440 --> 59:07.440]  an assistant public defender in Harris County who stated that, quote,
[59:07.440 --> 59:12.440]  the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[59:12.440 --> 59:21.440]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[59:21.440 --> 59:26.440]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[59:26.440 --> 59:31.440]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark
[59:31.440 --> 59:38.440]  ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[59:38.440 --> 59:44.440]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins
[59:44.440 --> 59:50.440]  for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[59:50.440 --> 01:00:00.440]  This was Ruff Rody with the Lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:00:00.440 --> 01:00:28.440]  Okay, we are back.
[01:00:28.440 --> 01:00:36.440]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and Tim, you're talking about the drifting off
[01:00:36.440 --> 01:00:39.440]  when you're reading, kind of putting yourself down.
[01:00:39.440 --> 01:00:41.440]  That's kind of a Christian thing.
[01:00:41.440 --> 01:00:46.440]  Christians participate in self-flatulation.
[01:00:46.440 --> 01:00:49.440]  You mean, do you mean, flagellation?
[01:00:49.440 --> 01:00:52.440]  Well, I like flagellation better.
[01:00:52.440 --> 01:00:58.440]  Tim, how's your flagellation quotient?
[01:00:58.440 --> 01:01:09.440]  Brett and I were working on the timing for that on the break.
[01:01:09.440 --> 01:01:11.440]  We laughed the whole break.
[01:01:11.440 --> 01:01:14.440]  Oh, Lord.
[01:01:14.440 --> 01:01:16.440]  Well, okay.
[01:01:16.440 --> 01:01:18.440]  So what do you have for us?
[01:01:18.440 --> 01:01:22.440]  Okay, well, I've read a long article.
[01:01:22.440 --> 01:01:26.440]  I didn't even get finished with either one of them, two articles.
[01:01:26.440 --> 01:01:31.440]  One was on ultra-virus, and it was pretty good.
[01:01:31.440 --> 01:01:40.440]  The other one was the difference between substantive and procedural due process.
[01:01:40.440 --> 01:01:48.440]  Okay, I hope you understand that because I have read articles on that two or three times,
[01:01:48.440 --> 01:01:56.440]  and I never really did get down what the difference was.
[01:01:56.440 --> 01:02:04.440]  It looked to me like it was the same thing, because the more you would read,
[01:02:04.440 --> 01:02:10.440]  the more you would think you were getting somewhere and then they go full circle into something else.
[01:02:10.440 --> 01:02:13.440]  It just didn't make a whole lot of sense.
[01:02:13.440 --> 01:02:16.440]  So I thought you were going to help me.
[01:02:16.440 --> 01:02:20.440]  Substantive, substantive, and what was the other one you said?
[01:02:20.440 --> 01:02:22.440]  Procedural.
[01:02:22.440 --> 01:02:24.440]  Procedural due process.
[01:02:24.440 --> 01:02:33.440]  When you find anything written on it, like when the attorneys used it in a defense against us,
[01:02:33.440 --> 01:02:37.440]  I guess it was what do you call that, when they weren't.
[01:02:37.440 --> 01:02:46.440]  Anyway, they mentioned that we had not mentioned whether a due process problem was substantive or procedural.
[01:02:46.440 --> 01:02:54.440]  And that was irrelevant because in my study of the two,
[01:02:54.440 --> 01:03:04.440]  it wasn't until very recent that the courts made a distinction between substantial and procedural.
[01:03:04.440 --> 01:03:09.440]  But both of them were denied a due process.
[01:03:09.440 --> 01:03:15.440]  So it was essentially irrelevant which one you alleged.
[01:03:15.440 --> 01:03:23.440]  When those lawyers put that in there, I went in and that's when I was studying procedural
[01:03:23.440 --> 01:03:31.440]  and substantive and I come to the conclusion that their assertion was nonsense.
[01:03:31.440 --> 01:03:36.440]  The way I would look at that is compare it to a document.
[01:03:36.440 --> 01:03:40.440]  If their actions would be something that's written in a document,
[01:03:40.440 --> 01:03:46.440]  then you can say that the document is defective for reasons of form or substance.
[01:03:46.440 --> 01:03:56.440]  So did they just do something in there that they forgot to put at the end against the peace and dignity of the state of Texas?
[01:03:56.440 --> 01:03:58.440]  That's a defective form.
[01:03:58.440 --> 01:04:00.440]  So that would correspond to an action.
[01:04:00.440 --> 01:04:02.440]  It would be a procedural error.
[01:04:02.440 --> 01:04:12.440]  But if they said in there that such and such happened on such and such a day and it was actually two years prior,
[01:04:12.440 --> 01:04:16.440]  that's a matter of substance.
[01:04:16.440 --> 01:04:21.440]  And so I would correlate it to just thinking of a document, I would think of it that way.
[01:04:21.440 --> 01:04:24.440]  Yes, and that's kind of what I got about it.
[01:04:24.440 --> 01:04:31.440]  When we talk about failure to take before a magistrate, that's procedural.
[01:04:31.440 --> 01:04:37.440]  You must do this step, this step, this step, this step, that's procedural.
[01:04:37.440 --> 01:04:47.440]  If you weren't, if you were taken to a magistrate and the magistrate held an examining trial
[01:04:47.440 --> 01:05:02.440]  and gave you notice that you had a right to counsel but did not give you time to secure counsel, that's substantive.
[01:05:02.440 --> 01:05:15.440]  That's the best I could get from it, but in either case, it goes to the fact that you have a right to a reasonable expectation
[01:05:15.440 --> 01:05:22.440]  that the law will be followed as intended by the legislature.
[01:05:22.440 --> 01:05:24.440]  Okay.
[01:05:24.440 --> 01:05:30.440]  So if it's a procedural, either one will violate that requirement.
[01:05:30.440 --> 01:05:33.440]  We had challenged subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:05:33.440 --> 01:05:34.440]  Okay.
[01:05:34.440 --> 01:05:39.440]  And to the city originally, that was after they did the administrative hearing.
[01:05:39.440 --> 01:05:42.440]  It was never answered.
[01:05:42.440 --> 01:05:43.440]  Okay.
[01:05:43.440 --> 01:05:50.440]  Does it have to be answered by the judge or does it have to be answered by the prosecutor or either one?
[01:05:50.440 --> 01:06:01.440]  It doesn't have to be answered by any of them, but if they don't answer them, then you have a right to default judgment.
[01:06:01.440 --> 01:06:03.440]  And they ignore that.
[01:06:03.440 --> 01:06:11.440]  It is the responsibility of the judge to prove up jurisdiction, not opposing counsel.
[01:06:11.440 --> 01:06:22.440]  Generally, the judge will leave it to opposing counsel to prove up the judge's jurisdiction because essentially the judge doesn't care if he has it or not.
[01:06:22.440 --> 01:06:26.440]  If he doesn't have it, then he gets his case off his docket.
[01:06:26.440 --> 01:06:33.440]  So if opposing counsel wants to keep the case before the court, they better prove up jurisdiction.
[01:06:33.440 --> 01:06:34.440]  Okay.
[01:06:34.440 --> 01:06:39.440]  Well, the municipal court ignored it and then the district court ignored it.
[01:06:39.440 --> 01:06:50.440]  The only one that answered anything about subject matter jurisdiction was the appeals court during mandamus.
[01:06:50.440 --> 01:07:04.440]  So obviously they thought it was important, but like we never got any answer to our findings of fact, conclusions of law from the district court regardless.
[01:07:04.440 --> 01:07:15.440]  And we're even accused by the prosecuting attorneys of not filing it properly, which we filed it directly like it was supposed to be.
[01:07:15.440 --> 01:07:26.440]  So why the district judge has the authority to do that when in the law, you know, the procedural process that you're to use.
[01:07:26.440 --> 01:07:39.440]  I mean, to me, it doesn't say that judge has every authority to disregard findings of fact conclusions law because it ought to be obvious.
[01:07:39.440 --> 01:07:42.440]  You know, it may have been obvious to them, but it wasn't to me.
[01:07:42.440 --> 01:07:50.440]  I wanted to know so that when we did go to appeals, we would at least have something to base our case on and we didn't.
[01:07:50.440 --> 01:07:56.440]  Only thing we had was the mandamus.
[01:07:56.440 --> 01:08:08.440]  Brett, do you remember the case that I want to say a Walker v something or the hacker.
[01:08:08.440 --> 01:08:20.440]  Yes, well, it says that a judge has no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts.
[01:08:20.440 --> 01:08:23.440]  Failure to do so is an abusive discretion.
[01:08:23.440 --> 01:08:36.440]  If the judge is a ruling and you ask the judge to show that the judge properly applied the law to the facts and the judge fails to do so.
[01:08:36.440 --> 01:08:44.440]  It's a denial of procedural due process.
[01:08:44.440 --> 01:08:46.440]  Would that be procedural?
[01:08:46.440 --> 01:08:49.440]  That's actually both.
[01:08:49.440 --> 01:08:52.440]  The judge is required to do that.
[01:08:52.440 --> 01:09:01.440]  297 of the rules of civil procedure does not say the judge may, might or can if he wants to file findings of fact.
[01:09:01.440 --> 01:09:05.440]  It says the judge shall.
[01:09:05.440 --> 01:09:10.440]  That becomes procedural due process.
[01:09:10.440 --> 01:09:16.440]  And you have a right to an expectation that the law will be followed.
[01:09:16.440 --> 01:09:26.440]  So when the law is not followed, like in Tim's case, we filed criminal charges against the judge.
[01:09:26.440 --> 01:09:32.440]  With the grand jury, but that never got presented to the grand jury.
[01:09:32.440 --> 01:09:38.440]  One of the things we did not pursue, but they're still out there.
[01:09:38.440 --> 01:09:48.440]  And it also creates the adverse inference that the judge did not properly apply the law to the facts.
[01:09:48.440 --> 01:10:07.440]  It also denies Tim in his right to appeal as he has no knowledge of what to appeal since he doesn't know what law and facts the judge relied on to render his ruling.
[01:10:07.440 --> 01:10:09.440]  That should give criminal charges.
[01:10:09.440 --> 01:10:20.440]  So it's really anti-prose. Because I was reading some document. I can't remember what it said because my computer crashed and I had to send it in for repair.
[01:10:20.440 --> 01:10:42.440]  But it talked about that the court has to recognize that a pro se defendant or, you know, has to, you know, you have to lend that person the benefit of the doubt and you have to make sure that they understand the law.
[01:10:42.440 --> 01:10:48.440]  You can't just, you know, push them through like they're seasoned attorneys.
[01:10:48.440 --> 01:10:58.440]  Well, I can assure you that the courts do not hold pro se litigants to the same standard as lawyers.
[01:10:58.440 --> 01:11:02.440]  Brett, how's it different?
[01:11:02.440 --> 01:11:13.440]  Well, I asked a judge if he would please hold the prosecutor to the same high standards that he holds pro se's.
[01:11:13.440 --> 01:11:20.440]  Exactly. They hold pro se's to a much higher standard.
[01:11:20.440 --> 01:11:31.440]  Okay. That's my point. But that's not what the article was talking about. It was talking about that they are supposed to. And they courted law and everything else. I'll have to find it again.
[01:11:31.440 --> 01:11:47.440]  It's talking about the rules, the court rules, that they say that you have to count 10 days and you need to turn something in within 10 days. The way that you calculate that is to find a rule, a rule of procedure.
[01:11:47.440 --> 01:11:52.440]  And all people, attorneys or not, have to go by that same count.
[01:11:52.440 --> 01:12:12.440]  You can't just say, what I didn't know, the count applies whether you're an attorney or a pro se. What doesn't apply and what they wish they could con us all into believing is that if you are a pro se, then you have to do everything exactly the same way a lawyer would do.
[01:12:12.440 --> 01:12:18.440]  They want you to think that's what it means. But it doesn't say that. It says rules.
[01:12:18.440 --> 01:12:37.440]  Okay. So in our case that, like I've talked to a couple people about this, I said that to me it looks like something was just handed in my lap from the first day.
[01:12:37.440 --> 01:12:51.440]  And that's when she took us to the back room at our hearing at the municipal court level and tried to show me a bunch of things so that I would cave in and say, okay, I'll flee out of this.
[01:12:51.440 --> 01:12:56.440]  But I just told her, no, I'm not guilty. What do you want to do? And she offered me an administrative hearing.
[01:12:56.440 --> 01:13:15.440]  The same statute that gives her authority to go to an administrative adjudication process, they call it an alternative, is when you read it, it also says that it first has to be adopted into the city's ordinances.
[01:13:15.440 --> 01:13:28.440]  I mean, it's one sentence. And she, I guess, overlooked that. And so she handed me something right out the gate. And I didn't know it. Okay.
[01:13:28.440 --> 01:13:33.440]  So that's how dumb I was. I'm a little smarter now. I'm still dumb, though.
[01:13:33.440 --> 01:13:49.440]  But this thing is that's not Christian graduation either, Randy.
[01:13:49.440 --> 01:13:54.440]  Well, we are about to go to our sponsors.
[01:13:54.440 --> 01:13:58.440]  We will check right back.
[01:13:58.440 --> 01:14:10.440]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:14:10.440 --> 01:14:17.440]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated. Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[01:14:17.440 --> 01:14:29.440]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR 15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:14:29.440 --> 01:14:38.440]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:14:38.440 --> 01:14:47.440]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:14:47.440 --> 01:14:54.440]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:14:54.440 --> 01:14:59.440]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:14:59.440 --> 01:15:04.440]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:15:04.440 --> 01:15:12.440]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:15:12.440 --> 01:15:21.440]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[01:15:21.440 --> 01:15:26.440]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:15:26.440 --> 01:15:34.440]  When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[01:15:34.440 --> 01:15:42.440]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:15:42.440 --> 01:15:43.440]  Do I pay extra?
[01:15:43.440 --> 01:15:44.440]  No.
[01:15:44.440 --> 01:15:46.440]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:15:46.440 --> 01:15:47.440]  No.
[01:15:47.440 --> 01:15:48.440]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:15:48.440 --> 01:15:49.440]  No.
[01:15:49.440 --> 01:15:50.440]  I mean, yes.
[01:15:50.440 --> 01:15:56.440]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:15:56.440 --> 01:15:57.440]  We are logos.
[01:15:57.440 --> 01:16:20.440]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:16:27.440 --> 01:16:45.440]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, Luddite Raw Radio, and we're talking to Tim in Texas.
[01:16:45.440 --> 01:16:51.440]  Okay, Tim, we were at the administrative hearing they couldn't have.
[01:16:51.440 --> 01:17:03.440]  Yeah, and so they went ahead and had it and fined me. They loaded the board with people that would vote in their favor.
[01:17:03.440 --> 01:17:13.440]  Didn't look at any of my evidence and allowed the prosecuting attorney to be the one who, well, you were there.
[01:17:13.440 --> 01:17:21.440]  She didn't actually hold the gavel, but she made sure everybody stayed in line.
[01:17:21.440 --> 01:17:25.440]  And I'm not even sure she had the authority to do that.
[01:17:25.440 --> 01:17:35.440]  But because when you look up administrative hearing, it's a completely different thing, you know.
[01:17:35.440 --> 01:17:45.440]  And it appears to be people who actually have some law background, not just a citizen off the street.
[01:17:45.440 --> 01:17:55.440]  But she explained it to me that it was just ordinary citizens, you know, and they would look at each vehicle to determine whether or not they were in fact.
[01:17:55.440 --> 01:18:07.440]  The way I read the code and the administrative hearing had to be decided before the counsel, not before a judge.
[01:18:07.440 --> 01:18:13.440]  She was just making it up, spurring the moment, making it up and just pretending whatever she wanted to, obviously.
[01:18:13.440 --> 01:18:25.440]  Well, oh, you're talking about in the room. Yeah, well, here's what. To be an administrative process, it had to be adopted.
[01:18:25.440 --> 01:18:31.440]  And then it was administrative instead of before a judge.
[01:18:31.440 --> 01:18:37.440]  And that's all it says. There's not a lot of detail to it.
[01:18:37.440 --> 01:18:43.440]  The regular administrative boards that you go before that are judicial.
[01:18:43.440 --> 01:18:51.440]  And so I don't know really what the complete difference is, but that's not the point I'm trying to get at here.
[01:18:51.440 --> 01:19:03.440]  The point I'm trying to get at is that it was overturned by the appeals court by mandamus that the municipal court never had jurisdiction to have the administrative hearing,
[01:19:03.440 --> 01:19:09.440]  simply because it had never been adopted into the city's ordinance. That's all it was about.
[01:19:09.440 --> 01:19:16.440]  So because she did that, it drug me through the rest of the stuff. Now, that's my opinion.
[01:19:16.440 --> 01:19:22.440]  But also in the appeals court mandamus, it says that they had a right.
[01:19:22.440 --> 01:19:32.440]  All they had to do was to send me a notice that I was in violation and then prove, excuse me, they had to prove that they sent me violation.
[01:19:32.440 --> 01:19:39.440]  Notice of violation. And then they proved that I continued to violate it.
[01:19:39.440 --> 01:19:47.440]  Okay, which I don't know how you can do that unless you go as an injunction before the district court.
[01:19:47.440 --> 01:19:50.440]  And this is how they did it and this reason why I'm using it.
[01:19:50.440 --> 01:19:55.440]  And they attempted to show proof that I was still in violation.
[01:19:55.440 --> 01:20:04.440]  And I didn't, I didn't have anything to say, you know, I was just still challenging subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:20:04.440 --> 01:20:11.440]  So that's where the injunction started. So they're just, they're just going, oh, great, we got the injunction.
[01:20:11.440 --> 01:20:14.440]  So we're getting a thousand bucks a day.
[01:20:14.440 --> 01:20:19.440]  And they didn't say that, but they knew it. I didn't judge knew it. I didn't.
[01:20:19.440 --> 01:20:25.440]  I thought it was 8,000 a day because they picked eight vehicles they wanted to complain about.
[01:20:25.440 --> 01:20:35.440]  No, it's $1,000 a day. That's the maximum. And so they said, okay, we did 80 days. He was in violation for 80 days.
[01:20:35.440 --> 01:20:41.440]  But anyway, I'm just trying to figure out a cause of action here.
[01:20:41.440 --> 01:20:44.440]  We had talked about city administrator.
[01:20:44.440 --> 01:20:54.440]  Now we know she instigated all of this and that the attorneys had just come on board a few months earlier and they were going to show,
[01:20:54.440 --> 01:21:00.440]  it was like the fifth law firm, the city had been through trying to get people to do what she wanted.
[01:21:00.440 --> 01:21:03.440]  And same way with code enforcement.
[01:21:03.440 --> 01:21:10.440]  And so even though she instigated it, she really doesn't own anything.
[01:21:10.440 --> 01:21:20.440]  She owns a house. So I guess you look at, okay, if you're going to try to sue somebody for something, then if they don't have anything,
[01:21:20.440 --> 01:21:29.440]  you're just wasting your time. But you have to have a case that shows some logic to judges.
[01:21:29.440 --> 01:21:40.440]  And you have to kind of say that the city administrator was harassing me and she instigated and enticed the entire scenario.
[01:21:40.440 --> 01:21:53.440]  And the prosecutors use that because the other things that they used against me in the district court, the civil suit, was that parking violations.
[01:21:53.440 --> 01:22:01.440]  Wait a minute, Tim. You're not bringing questions. You're just rehashing all the old stuff.
[01:22:01.440 --> 01:22:08.440]  And we have a bunch of other callers. What legal questions do you have?
[01:22:08.440 --> 01:22:16.440]  Well, how would you present a cause of action in a federal suit?
[01:22:16.440 --> 01:22:24.440]  I mean, is it a use of process that's totally legal as a prosecuting attorney?
[01:22:24.440 --> 01:22:37.440]  Well, for the hearing that they had, that we could go for them for acting without jurisdiction.
[01:22:37.440 --> 01:22:42.440]  And without jurisdiction, they have no immunity.
[01:22:42.440 --> 01:22:54.440]  So the acts committed in the administrative hearing, and we maintain that the subsequent claims grew out of that hearing,
[01:22:54.440 --> 01:23:01.440]  that they did not have jurisdiction as is already res judicata.
[01:23:01.440 --> 01:23:14.440]  And therefore, the lawyers advised the city to act in a way that created litigation that they could then represent and be paid for.
[01:23:14.440 --> 01:23:17.440]  Bam.
[01:23:17.440 --> 01:23:19.440]  Okay.
[01:23:19.440 --> 01:23:22.440]  Texas, that's baritry.
[01:23:22.440 --> 01:23:32.440]  But in any case, that's churning the case. And that gives you a claim against them. And since we have the ruling of no subject matter jurisdiction,
[01:23:32.440 --> 01:23:39.440]  that eliminates any immunity.
[01:23:39.440 --> 01:23:58.440]  So when I'm looking for case law to find someone that's already been through this, it's very difficult to find where a prosecutor has had a case against them, one, where sovereign immunity did not cover them.
[01:23:58.440 --> 01:24:02.440]  Subject matter jurisdiction. That's where you look.
[01:24:02.440 --> 01:24:04.440]  That's where you look, okay.
[01:24:04.440 --> 01:24:09.440]  He's not a prosecutor if he doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:24:09.440 --> 01:24:10.440]  Okay.
[01:24:10.440 --> 01:24:16.440]  That's the only time you can sue a judge. It's when they act without subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:24:16.440 --> 01:24:26.440]  And so with our challenge to the district court, they operated outside of subject matter jurisdiction also.
[01:24:26.440 --> 01:24:36.440]  But is it only that they do so if we don't bring up why they're not in subject matter jurisdiction?
[01:24:36.440 --> 01:24:48.440]  Well, it's not an issue if you don't bring it as an issue. But if you bring it as an issue, it's the judge's duty to know if he has jurisdiction or not.
[01:24:48.440 --> 01:24:59.440]  So if he acts without jurisdiction, then even before it was challenged, he still didn't have jurisdiction.
[01:24:59.440 --> 01:25:04.440]  So you get to back up, have an issue, to get back up to the beginning.
[01:25:04.440 --> 01:25:18.440]  Okay. Well, the four issues in the mandamus that they answered and said that the court did have jurisdiction, three of them, they had jurisdiction with injunction, civil action, and the tough decline.
[01:25:18.440 --> 01:25:23.440]  The only one they didn't was the original administrative hearing.
[01:25:23.440 --> 01:25:26.440]  And that's enough.
[01:25:26.440 --> 01:25:27.440]  Yeah.
[01:25:27.440 --> 01:25:41.440]  That's enough to hammer them with. And that ruling by the mandamus ruling was extremely unusual.
[01:25:41.440 --> 01:25:46.440]  That 12% of all mandamuses get picked up.
[01:25:46.440 --> 01:25:52.440]  The other 88%, the court doesn't hear it doesn't pick up at all.
[01:25:52.440 --> 01:26:00.440]  And then 2% of those that get picked up get ruled in favor of the filer.
[01:26:00.440 --> 01:26:09.440]  I don't know if they've ever ruled in the favor of a pro se litigant on a mandamus.
[01:26:09.440 --> 01:26:11.440]  You got one.
[01:26:11.440 --> 01:26:14.440]  So that is questions again.
[01:26:14.440 --> 01:26:17.440]  Say what?
[01:26:17.440 --> 01:26:21.440]  I was telling Tim congratulations again.
[01:26:21.440 --> 01:26:23.440]  That was a major win.
[01:26:23.440 --> 01:26:31.440]  And now we can take that win because of the subject manager section takes away any immunity.
[01:26:31.440 --> 01:26:33.440]  Hang on.
[01:26:33.440 --> 01:26:50.440]  About to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rudola Radio, and go to local radio network and check out the sponsors that we have and help us support this radio station and keep it on the air.
[01:26:50.440 --> 01:26:54.440]  We've been struggling for a long time and we need all the help we can get.
[01:26:54.440 --> 01:27:01.440]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:27:01.440 --> 01:27:05.440]  Could your pharmacy release your prescription information to marketers?
[01:27:05.440 --> 01:27:08.440]  Believe it or not, it's not only possible, it's probably been done.
[01:27:08.440 --> 01:27:15.440]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll be back with loopholes that make it legal for companies like CVS to share your personal health information.
[01:27:15.440 --> 01:27:17.440]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:27:17.440 --> 01:27:21.440]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:27:21.440 --> 01:27:25.440]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:27:25.440 --> 01:27:27.440]  So protect your rights.
[01:27:27.440 --> 01:27:31.440]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:27:31.440 --> 01:27:33.440]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:27:33.440 --> 01:27:41.440]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:27:41.440 --> 01:27:44.440]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:27:44.440 --> 01:27:49.440]  Your pharmacy may be sharing your medical information without your knowledge or consent.
[01:27:49.440 --> 01:27:54.440]  For example, CVS pharmacies are likely to disclose your personal health information to business associates.
[01:27:54.440 --> 01:28:00.440]  A loophole in the law allows it if parties agree to execute a contract to, quote, safeguard the data.
[01:28:00.440 --> 01:28:03.440]  Business associates could range from marketers to insurance companies.
[01:28:03.440 --> 01:28:08.440]  And while they might keep information locked up, there's no telling how it might come back to bite you.
[01:28:08.440 --> 01:28:14.440]  Ask your pharmacy to disclose how it shared your previous data and request in writing that it not be sold, rented, or shared.
[01:28:14.440 --> 01:28:19.440]  And most importantly, take your future prescriptions to establishments that guarantee real privacy.
[01:28:19.440 --> 01:28:21.440]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:28:21.440 --> 01:28:24.440]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:28:29.440 --> 01:28:35.440]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:28:35.440 --> 01:28:37.440]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:28:37.440 --> 01:28:42.440]  Over 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:28:42.440 --> 01:28:45.440]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:28:45.440 --> 01:28:47.440]  Thousands of my fellow force respondents have died.
[01:28:47.440 --> 01:28:49.440]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:28:49.440 --> 01:28:50.440]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:28:50.440 --> 01:28:51.440]  I'm a New York City correctional officer.
[01:28:51.440 --> 01:28:52.440]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:28:52.440 --> 01:28:54.440]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:28:54.440 --> 01:28:56.440]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:28:56.440 --> 01:29:00.440]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:29:00.440 --> 01:29:04.440]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Center.
[01:29:04.440 --> 01:29:08.440]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:29:08.440 --> 01:29:11.440]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:29:11.440 --> 01:29:14.440]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:29:14.440 --> 01:29:18.440]  the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:29:18.440 --> 01:29:24.440]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:29:24.440 --> 01:29:27.440]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:29:27.440 --> 01:29:32.440]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[01:29:32.440 --> 01:29:34.440]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:29:34.440 --> 01:29:38.440]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:29:38.440 --> 01:29:39.440]  and ordering your copy today.
[01:29:39.440 --> 01:29:44.440]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[01:29:44.440 --> 01:29:49.440]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:29:49.440 --> 01:29:53.440]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:29:53.440 --> 01:29:58.440]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:29:58.440 --> 01:30:05.440]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:29.440 --> 01:30:33.440]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelly from Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:30:33.440 --> 01:30:35.440]  We're talking to Tim in Texas.
[01:30:35.440 --> 01:30:42.440]  Tim, we've kind of, we started out really good, but kind of deteriorated in going back over old stuff.
[01:30:42.440 --> 01:30:45.440]  I do have three more callers on.
[01:30:45.440 --> 01:30:49.440]  Do you have another legal question for us?
[01:30:50.440 --> 01:30:51.440]  No.
[01:30:53.440 --> 01:30:54.440]  What?
[01:30:54.440 --> 01:30:58.440]  What? You're self-flatulating again.
[01:30:58.440 --> 01:30:59.440]  Okay.
[01:31:02.440 --> 01:31:06.440]  On the break, Brett said that's when you do it under the comers.
[01:31:07.440 --> 01:31:08.440]  Oh, okay.
[01:31:08.440 --> 01:31:09.440]  Okay.
[01:31:10.440 --> 01:31:11.440]  Thank you, Tim.
[01:31:12.440 --> 01:31:15.440]  Now we're going to go to Charles in Georgia.
[01:31:15.440 --> 01:31:17.440]  Hello, George. Charles.
[01:31:18.440 --> 01:31:20.440]  How are you doing today?
[01:31:20.440 --> 01:31:27.440]  I'm doing good. I think I annoyed Tim. He dropped off right away when I accused him of passing gas under the covers.
[01:31:31.440 --> 01:31:34.440]  He just doesn't like my flatulent humor.
[01:31:36.440 --> 01:31:37.440]  Okay.
[01:31:38.440 --> 01:31:40.440]  What do you have for us today?
[01:31:41.440 --> 01:31:44.440]  Okay, I just wanted to see if you all,
[01:31:44.440 --> 01:31:54.440]  I understand the techniques that you're using to get things done and now Tim is having some success, I heard.
[01:31:55.440 --> 01:32:04.440]  For the people who don't have the fight and the will to do this,
[01:32:04.440 --> 01:32:21.440]  what suggestions do you have for those people? Because I've been listening to you for almost past 10 years and everything that you say is true, accurate and correct, but the average lay person just don't have that fight.
[01:32:23.440 --> 01:32:25.440]  That is a good question.
[01:32:25.440 --> 01:32:38.440]  And I've asked myself that question for a long time and it was that question that led me to develop the legal-earth concept.
[01:32:40.440 --> 01:32:44.440]  Have you looked at trafficticket.website?
[01:32:45.440 --> 01:32:46.440]  No.
[01:32:47.440 --> 01:32:48.440]  No.
[01:32:48.440 --> 01:32:53.440]  Okay, trafficticket.website is a demonstration of the technology.
[01:32:53.440 --> 01:33:14.440]  We've talked to people, you know, I've talked to people for years on traffic issues and looked at ways of addressing traffic and I took those years of work and structured a set of documents
[01:33:14.440 --> 01:33:29.440]  so that if you get a ticket, especially in Texas, I have most of the documents primarily for Texas, but there are a number of them that would file in any case, no matter what state.
[01:33:30.440 --> 01:33:36.440]  Brady motion, motion and limiting, mother-in-law motion, preliminary hearing motion.
[01:33:36.440 --> 01:33:44.440]  There are a number that would go to any state, but most of my most sophisticated documents are for Texas.
[01:33:45.440 --> 01:33:57.440]  And you can go to trafficticket.website, fill in your ticket information and the system will spit you out 150 or so pages of documentation.
[01:33:58.440 --> 01:34:02.440]  You can then download, sign, send, file with the court.
[01:34:02.440 --> 01:34:05.440]  You don't have to know anything.
[01:34:06.440 --> 01:34:09.440]  Everything's in the documents. You just file them with the court.
[01:34:10.440 --> 01:34:23.440]  And then when you go to that first hearing and they do whatever they do, then you come back and go to the second questionnaire and the questioner says, did they do this, did they do this, did they do this?
[01:34:23.440 --> 01:34:33.440]  You go through all of the things that they tend to do at court and the individual doesn't have to know anything about the underlying law.
[01:34:34.440 --> 01:34:49.440]  We ask questions that go to the elements of the underlying law and collect the information that will point to various motions and pleadings.
[01:34:49.440 --> 01:34:59.440]  And if a question points to a motion or pleading, then we veer off and ask all the questions we need for that motion or pleading and then we keep going.
[01:35:00.440 --> 01:35:09.440]  And when you're finished, the system will spit out all those documents to address everything that happened at this first hearing.
[01:35:10.440 --> 01:35:11.440]  We just sign them and send them.
[01:35:12.440 --> 01:35:14.440]  Did you talk to the clerk?
[01:35:15.440 --> 01:35:17.440]  Yes. Did the clerk ask you for a plea?
[01:35:17.440 --> 01:35:18.440]  Yes.
[01:35:19.440 --> 01:35:21.440]  Criminal complaint impersonating a judicial officer.
[01:35:22.440 --> 01:35:24.440]  Did you give the clerk a plea?
[01:35:25.440 --> 01:35:29.440]  No. Did the clerk threaten you for the purpose of getting a plea?
[01:35:30.440 --> 01:35:31.440]  Yes.
[01:35:32.440 --> 01:35:33.440]  Official oppression.
[01:35:34.440 --> 01:35:40.440]  Everything that's indicated this system will spit the documents out to address those issues.
[01:35:41.440 --> 01:35:44.440]  It sets the record for you.
[01:35:44.440 --> 01:35:48.440]  This is the tool I've been working on for a very long time.
[01:35:49.440 --> 01:35:51.440]  That's the only way I know to do that.
[01:35:52.440 --> 01:36:03.440]  Most people simply don't have the time or the focus to be able to research law like you and I have.
[01:36:04.440 --> 01:36:09.440]  So we're trying to develop a set of tools to capture your knowledge.
[01:36:09.440 --> 01:36:16.440]  The way this tool works is I would sit down with you and say, if you help other people with the legal issues,
[01:36:17.440 --> 01:36:25.440]  I would say, Charles, what is the first question you would ask someone who has a legal issue but you don't know anything about that legal issue?
[01:36:26.440 --> 01:36:27.440]  What would be the first question you would ask?
[01:36:28.440 --> 01:36:32.440]  Try to ask a question that goes to a yes-no answer.
[01:36:32.440 --> 01:36:47.440]  And then assume the person always answers yes to every question or picks the top item in a select list.
[01:36:48.440 --> 01:36:55.440]  When you get to the last question you would ask the person, I've got 80% of your knowledge on the subject.
[01:36:56.440 --> 01:36:57.440]  Then we back up one.
[01:36:57.440 --> 01:37:02.440]  And instead of saying answering yes to the last question, assume the answer is no.
[01:37:03.440 --> 01:37:05.440]  And if the answer is no, then what would you ask?
[01:37:06.440 --> 01:37:09.440]  Then we move out and back up again.
[01:37:10.440 --> 01:37:17.440]  We keep backing up until we get to the first question you would ask, I have your entire knowledge base on the subject.
[01:37:18.440 --> 01:37:25.440]  Now we can take all of your knowledge, put it on the internet in the form of an online interactive questionnaire.
[01:37:25.440 --> 01:37:30.440]  And someone who knows nothing can just answer your questions.
[01:37:33.440 --> 01:37:41.440]  Your questions, they don't ask were did you commit the act of speeding?
[01:37:42.440 --> 01:37:44.440]  They'll never ask a question like that.
[01:37:45.440 --> 01:37:47.440]  It will ask, were you operating a motor vehicle?
[01:37:47.440 --> 01:38:02.440]  Yes, were there speed limits? It will establish all those facts that would be required to support a motion or a pleading argument or a defense.
[01:38:03.440 --> 01:38:06.440]  And it will never essentially tell you what it's doing.
[01:38:06.440 --> 01:38:17.440]  It will just ask you for pieces of information and then it will use those pieces of information to construct the documentation you did to address your case.
[01:38:18.440 --> 01:38:20.440]  Does that make sense, George? Charles?
[01:38:21.440 --> 01:38:28.440]  Yes, yes, I'm actually on the site now and I'm looking at it and it seems pretty straightforward.
[01:38:28.440 --> 01:38:37.440]  Let's make a deal. I don't have anyone to do Georgia traffic law for me.
[01:38:40.440 --> 01:38:47.440]  Contact me off the air. We'll make a deal with setup for Georgia.
[01:38:48.440 --> 01:38:50.440]  Now that would be awesome.
[01:38:51.440 --> 01:38:55.440]  You could shut down traffic enforcement in Georgia.
[01:38:55.440 --> 01:39:06.440]  You send your police out to write these tickets because 73% of all of the people who get a traffic citation just pay it.
[01:39:07.440 --> 01:39:18.440]  And that's a big deal because in Texas in 19 and in 2016, the last year we have complete records for,
[01:39:18.440 --> 01:39:29.440]  there were 9 million cases, 9.3 or so million cases filed in the courts in the state of Texas.
[01:39:30.440 --> 01:39:38.440]  7 criminal cases filed in the state of Texas. 7 million of those were traffic.
[01:39:38.440 --> 01:39:47.440]  The vast majority of all criminal cases in every state are traffic.
[01:39:48.440 --> 01:39:53.440]  73% of the people who get a traffic citation just pay it.
[01:39:54.440 --> 01:40:00.440]  Shaper to pay it than to try to find. That means 27% don't.
[01:40:00.440 --> 01:40:12.440]  That's our market. We've got 27% of the people that don't feel like they deserve this ticket or just don't want to pay it and want to fight.
[01:40:13.440 --> 01:40:16.440]  So now we need to give them something to fight right with.
[01:40:16.440 --> 01:40:29.440]  We send that 27% to traffic to get that website. They put their information in and it dropped them down a set of documents that will shut down the system.
[01:40:30.440 --> 01:40:37.440]  Hang on. Back to go to our sponsors. This is Randy Kelton. We're at the fountain. We're on the radio.
[01:40:38.440 --> 01:40:42.440]  I'm not going to give out the call in numbers. We are running out of time quickly.
[01:40:42.440 --> 01:40:49.440]  I'm calling Shane John. John, send me an email. I got someone who wants to talk to you, but I don't think I'll get to you tonight.
[01:40:50.440 --> 01:40:56.440]  I might get to you Shane. So hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:40:57.440 --> 01:41:05.440]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:41:06.440 --> 01:41:10.440]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[01:41:10.440 --> 01:41:16.440]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:41:17.440 --> 01:41:24.440]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:41:25.440 --> 01:41:30.440]  Logo's radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:41:31.440 --> 01:41:38.440]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:41:38.440 --> 01:41:45.440]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:41:46.440 --> 01:41:50.440]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:41:51.440 --> 01:41:58.440]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:41:58.440 --> 01:42:04.440]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:42:05.440 --> 01:42:15.440]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how, in 24 hours, you step by step.
[01:42:16.440 --> 01:42:19.440]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:42:20.440 --> 01:42:23.440]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:42:23.440 --> 01:42:28.440]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:42:29.440 --> 01:42:34.440]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:42:35.440 --> 01:42:43.440]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:42:43.440 --> 01:42:53.440]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:42:54.440 --> 01:42:57.440]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:42:57.440 --> 01:43:13.440]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:43:27.440 --> 01:43:53.440]  The people come down from the hills
[01:43:53.440 --> 01:44:00.440]  The people come down from the hills
[01:44:01.440 --> 01:44:07.440]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Charles and Georgia.
[01:44:08.440 --> 01:44:11.440]  So Charles, did you have a question for us or comment?
[01:44:12.440 --> 01:44:17.440]  That's all I have for tonight. I'm going to let you get to the other callers, but I do want to say this.
[01:44:17.440 --> 01:44:30.440]  I do think it's time that we put an end to the compulsory registration laws that we have in all of the states in favor of more property law.
[01:44:31.440 --> 01:44:40.440]  Send me an email, randivelawradio.com, and I'm going to talk about setting up Georgia.
[01:44:41.440 --> 01:44:42.440]  I sure will.
[01:44:42.440 --> 01:44:51.440]  Okay, thank you. Charles, now we're going to Shane in New York.
[01:44:52.440 --> 01:44:54.440]  John, you're on the bottom. I don't think we'll get to you.
[01:44:55.440 --> 01:44:57.440]  Okay, go ahead, Shane.
[01:44:58.440 --> 01:45:00.440]  Hi, Randy. How are you doing tonight?
[01:45:01.440 --> 01:45:02.440]  I'm doing good.
[01:45:03.440 --> 01:45:07.440]  That's good. I'm glad you're all healed up from the flu.
[01:45:07.440 --> 01:45:12.440]  But we've had some really, probably one of the strangest winners up here in New York, by the way.
[01:45:13.440 --> 01:45:16.440]  They said it's one of the most honest winners that live up by Canada.
[01:45:17.440 --> 01:45:24.440]  They were late theories that this was going to be the first time in years that the lake is not going to freeze over, because I know the NEI summit, which is on hold.
[01:45:25.440 --> 01:45:29.440]  So we're living some very strange times.
[01:45:30.440 --> 01:45:33.440]  Global warming.
[01:45:33.440 --> 01:45:38.440]  Are you familiar with the younger dryists?
[01:45:39.440 --> 01:45:40.440]  I'm not.
[01:45:42.440 --> 01:45:49.440]  13,000 years ago, we came out of a geological epoch out of an ice age.
[01:45:50.440 --> 01:45:57.440]  Something happened, and for 2,000 years, temperatures varied dramatically.
[01:45:57.440 --> 01:46:04.440]  It is considered to be responsible for the extinction of 36 species of large mammal on this continent.
[01:46:05.440 --> 01:46:07.440]  Now, Randy, did you take pictures of that?
[01:46:08.440 --> 01:46:11.440]  Oh, haha.
[01:46:12.440 --> 01:46:15.440]  No, we didn't have cameras back then.
[01:46:16.440 --> 01:46:20.440]  But the temperatures varied dramatically.
[01:46:20.440 --> 01:46:27.440]  And then 11,000 years ago, the temperatures rose up through our current temperature, and then kept rising another five and a half degrees.
[01:46:28.440 --> 01:46:36.440]  And for the last 11,000 years, temperatures have been varying over approximately a 500-year period.
[01:46:36.440 --> 01:46:54.440]  Between five and six degrees, like clockwork, we are at the lowest point we've been in 11,000 years.
[01:46:54.440 --> 01:47:13.440]  Over the next 250 years, we can expect the temperature to rise between five and six degrees, no matter what.
[01:47:13.440 --> 01:47:23.440]  Scientists believe it's a sun cycle, a periodic sun cycle that causes this variation in temperature.
[01:47:24.440 --> 01:47:25.440]  Global warming? Absolutely.
[01:47:26.440 --> 01:47:32.440]  For the last 11,000 years, global warming has occurred on a regular basis.
[01:47:32.440 --> 01:47:43.440]  There is no indication in the geological record of mass extinctions and major population disruptions, nothing in the record,
[01:47:44.440 --> 01:47:54.440]  showing that the Earth, the inhabitants of the planet were disrupted because of this five to six degree temperature rise.
[01:47:55.440 --> 01:47:57.440]  Look up Younger Dryas.
[01:47:57.440 --> 01:48:02.440]  Anyway, I interrupted you. What did you have for shame?
[01:48:03.440 --> 01:48:09.440]  Well, as the case is still pending, I just had a bankruptcy, federal bankruptcy hearing this week, Randy.
[01:48:10.440 --> 01:48:14.440]  And it's been adjourned all the way out until April, which is kind of amazing.
[01:48:15.440 --> 01:48:16.440]  I actually got through it.
[01:48:17.440 --> 01:48:19.440]  They were moving to dismiss my bankruptcy.
[01:48:19.440 --> 01:48:31.440]  Wonderful. And now you've got the bank in a position to where they have to restart the foreclosure process,
[01:48:32.440 --> 01:48:39.440]  because New York is a mortgage state, so it's not a deed of trust, so there is no confessed judgment.
[01:48:40.440 --> 01:48:44.440]  The bank has to go to the court and sue for a judgment.
[01:48:45.440 --> 01:48:47.440]  And that's going to take them another four or five years.
[01:48:47.440 --> 01:48:55.440]  That's the question I have for you, because the judgment in favor of Key Bank was granted way back in 2018.
[01:48:56.440 --> 01:49:03.440]  But now that the bankruptcy cases have been taking place, not knowing the future, I filed bankruptcy.
[01:49:04.440 --> 01:49:08.440]  As you know, Randy, back in the summer and stopped to sell the property and the court has recognized me as the owner of the property now.
[01:49:08.440 --> 01:49:19.440]  The problem the bank has is when they sued for their judgment, they failed to name a necessary party.
[01:49:20.440 --> 01:49:35.440]  And the bankruptcy court has established that you are a necessary party because you have an interest in the property and you weren't named or given opportunity to defend your position.
[01:49:35.440 --> 01:49:39.440]  That's correct. And that's what the appeal is going to be all about.
[01:49:40.440 --> 01:49:42.440]  And we're still in federal court. So here's the million dollar question.
[01:49:43.440 --> 01:49:51.440]  While all the shenanigans is going on in the federal bankruptcy court, and this would hold true for a lot of people out there, does that lock down the stay for state actions?
[01:49:52.440 --> 01:49:55.440]  I really can't move forward in the state action because I still haven't been served.
[01:49:55.440 --> 01:50:05.440]  My mom can file a state action for appeal on that judgment because she doesn't own a property anymore as of two years ago, but actually almost three years ago now it's been.
[01:50:06.440 --> 01:50:10.440]  So I'm speculating with someone along the line they're going to have to serve me, which they haven't.
[01:50:11.440 --> 01:50:15.440]  The stay was lifted back in December, which I appealed it, Randy. I appealed it.
[01:50:16.440 --> 01:50:17.440]  There was an issue with the order.
[01:50:18.440 --> 01:50:21.440]  The corrected order was signed just about seven days ago.
[01:50:21.440 --> 01:50:26.440]  I'm appealing that corrected order too, because in the corrected order they said they didn't respond and I did respond.
[01:50:27.440 --> 01:50:32.440]  The attorney for the opposing side tried to pull a fast one and the judge stated he's rubber stamped these orders.
[01:50:33.440 --> 01:50:34.440]  He said I didn't impose it and I did.
[01:50:35.440 --> 01:50:47.440]  So we're going back back to bankruptcy court this Monday on a motion to vacate the order that was recorded at the clerk's office to lift the stay so they can presume, you know, move forward with the foreclosure action.
[01:50:47.440 --> 01:50:50.440]  So that's the million dollar question.
[01:50:51.440 --> 01:50:59.440]  Are they going to use the old judgment from three years ago or two years ago, or are they going to eventually have to file suit against me?
[01:51:01.440 --> 01:51:07.440]  Have you talked to Leslie in Arizona?
[01:51:08.440 --> 01:51:09.440]  Yes.
[01:51:09.440 --> 01:51:23.440]  Good. She should be able to help you with the subject matter jurisdiction challenge to the bankruptcy, to the foreclosure court for failure to include unnecessary parties.
[01:51:24.440 --> 01:51:25.440]  She's got all the pleadings for that.
[01:51:25.440 --> 01:51:41.440]  And I already filed a motion to be added back in the case under CPR 1000 here in New York and the motion was denied in the key bank and it was denied in the HSBC, which turned into superiors, which all eventually turned in the nation to start Mr. Cooper.
[01:51:41.440 --> 01:51:56.440]  And in the hearing I had, in the hearing I had bankruptcy court just recently as I asked the judge to set up a time where we can have an evidentiary hearing to validate and verify they have the original note, which is key bank, which they don't.
[01:51:57.440 --> 01:52:04.440]  Under rule 9014, bankruptcy rules, you have a opportunity to have an evidentiary hearing when they move forward on emotional at the state.
[01:52:04.440 --> 01:52:11.440]  And that request was denied and he kept that claim. He kept on claiming it's a state issue. But go wait a second. This is federal court.
[01:52:12.440 --> 01:52:25.440]  That's one of the places we won claims, but the courts are corrupt. They let the bank foreclose anyway, even though they could not show they own the property.
[01:52:25.440 --> 01:52:34.440]  The bankruptcy court can discharge the debt, but they corrupt courts will still let them foreclose on a discharged debt.
[01:52:36.440 --> 01:52:38.440]  Okay, so my next question.
[01:52:39.440 --> 01:52:40.440]  But it'll take them years.
[01:52:43.440 --> 01:52:49.440]  So you're speculating that they're going to probably have to serve me eventually, correct?
[01:52:50.440 --> 01:52:51.440]  Yes.
[01:52:52.440 --> 01:52:53.440]  Okay, because they haven't done that yet.
[01:52:53.440 --> 01:53:02.440]  Okay, because you have your quit claim in the record in the county recorder's office?
[01:53:03.440 --> 01:53:04.440]  Yes.
[01:53:05.440 --> 01:53:09.440]  So when they try to sell the property, they're going to bump right into that.
[01:53:10.440 --> 01:53:11.440]  Yeah.
[01:53:12.440 --> 01:53:13.440]  And they won't be able to do anything with it.
[01:53:13.440 --> 01:53:26.440]  So even if they get ruled to move with the current foreclosure, they still run into your claim that's in the record.
[01:53:27.440 --> 01:53:34.440]  So if they sell it, then you get to extract your claim out of the proceeds.
[01:53:36.440 --> 01:53:39.440]  So they're not going to do that because they're not going to get anything.
[01:53:39.440 --> 01:53:52.440]  I know we're running out of time here, but this David P. Case attorney in Rochester filed an objection to have the motion vacated for regarding lift and stay.
[01:53:53.440 --> 01:53:54.440]  And he keeps on breathing up.
[01:53:55.440 --> 01:53:56.440]  I've never seen him see for it.
[01:53:57.440 --> 01:54:01.440]  He keeps on bringing up my criminal cases that had back up in 2009 and 2010 in federal court.
[01:54:02.440 --> 01:54:06.440]  Those criminal cases is that I altered my passport, which I didn't.
[01:54:06.440 --> 01:54:14.440]  I just said I was not a U.S. citizen and a contempt, a contempt of court charge where I sent the criminal complainant to the IOS and I got.
[01:54:15.440 --> 01:54:16.440]  Okay.
[01:54:17.440 --> 01:54:19.440]  Objection relevance.
[01:54:20.440 --> 01:54:21.440]  Right.
[01:54:22.440 --> 01:54:23.440]  That's exactly what I was thinking.
[01:54:23.440 --> 01:54:37.440]  Yeah, the fact that the lawyer is a two-bit Scheister should be brought up as well or to quote Robert Fox, a petty fogger Scheister, grubbing for filthy lucre.
[01:54:38.440 --> 01:54:39.440]  Right.
[01:54:39.440 --> 01:54:53.440]  Petty fogger is out of New York. Petty fogger refers to people who held themselves out as lawyers at Rockers Island and represented people when they these guys weren't lawyers. They were called petty foggers.
[01:54:54.440 --> 01:54:55.440]  It was allowed at the time.
[01:54:56.440 --> 01:54:57.440]  Right.
[01:54:58.440 --> 01:55:03.440]  Interesting little piece of information from Robert Fox, from the late Robert Fox.
[01:55:03.440 --> 01:55:10.440]  Okay, we are running out of time. Shane, thank you very much. And John, sorry, we didn't get to you.
[01:55:11.440 --> 01:55:15.440]  You can call back tomorrow night, but we won't be here.
[01:55:18.440 --> 01:55:20.440]  We like to pick on John.
[01:55:20.440 --> 01:55:39.440]  John, we like to pick on you. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rula Love Radio. Thank you all for listening. We'll be back next week for a regular show and I'll try not to lose a day so I know when Thursday is and make sure I get on that show and no more archives.
[01:55:40.440 --> 01:55:43.440]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:55:43.440 --> 01:55:45.440]  Thank you very much.
[01:56:13.440 --> 01:56:16.440]  Thank you very much.
[01:56:43.440 --> 01:56:45.440]  Thank you.
[01:57:13.440 --> 01:57:16.440]  Thank you.
[01:57:43.440 --> 01:57:59.440]  Today in History, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day Bombing, a Thai suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and injuring 40.
[01:58:00.440 --> 01:58:01.440]  Today in History.
[01:58:01.440 --> 01:58:24.440]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven attacks his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the earth for THC.
[01:58:24.440 --> 01:58:33.440]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:58:33.440 --> 01:58:50.440]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HP 1325 works, as well as other cities too, like the District Attorney.
[01:58:50.440 --> 01:59:01.440]  In El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:59:02.440 --> 01:59:12.440]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:59:12.440 --> 01:59:21.440]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:59:22.440 --> 01:59:38.440]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:59:38.440 --> 01:59:50.440]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey may be drawn into the glow.
[01:59:50.440 --> 02:00:08.440]  This is Ruff Roadie with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.