ROL_2019-12-13_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.900]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[00:06.900 --> 00:13.260]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.260 --> 00:21.520]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.520 --> 00:29.840]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.840 --> 00:41.600]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10, a crypto coin.
[00:46.080 --> 00:52.800]  In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a Thai suitcase bomb, was detonated on
[00:52.800 --> 00:58.320]  Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing 10 and
[00:58.320 --> 01:07.520]  entering 40 today in history. And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill
[01:07.520 --> 01:12.720]  1325, legalizing hemp into taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state,
[01:12.720 --> 01:17.040]  including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges,
[01:17.040 --> 01:21.520]  and even refusing to file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time
[01:21.520 --> 01:26.800]  or the laboratory equipment to test the earth for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District
[01:26.800 --> 01:31.200]  Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery
[01:31.200 --> 01:36.400]  of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the attorney
[01:36.400 --> 01:40.880]  general, stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana
[01:40.880 --> 01:45.760]  has not been decriminalized in Texas, and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding
[01:45.760 --> 01:52.400]  of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities too, like the district attorney in El Paso,
[01:52.400 --> 01:57.360]  Kaima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote,
[01:57.360 --> 02:02.400]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However,
[02:02.400 --> 02:06.800]  the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.800 --> 02:11.280]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[02:11.280 --> 02:16.000]  illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something,
[02:16.000 --> 02:25.120]  the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five
[02:25.120 --> 02:30.720]  and a half inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen
[02:30.720 --> 02:36.320]  being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way
[02:36.320 --> 02:41.840]  back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a
[02:41.840 --> 02:48.960]  luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and pray
[02:48.960 --> 03:12.080]  who may be drawn into the glow. This is Roof Roadie with your lowdown for July 22nd, 2019.
[03:18.960 --> 03:35.680]  Okay, howdy, howdy. This is Randy Kelton, Rooval Radio. Brett is not on yet. He may show up a
[03:35.680 --> 03:45.440]  little bit later, had some business to take care of. This is our Friday night show, December the
[03:45.440 --> 03:57.200]  13th, 2019. We're going to start out with a little update on scccompli.com.
[03:58.960 --> 04:04.640]  This is something I've been working on for a long time. We have put together this
[04:04.640 --> 04:17.280]  program or procedure questionnaire as a proof of concept. I've had some major improvements lately,
[04:17.280 --> 04:28.240]  primarily because of Nikolai. Nikolai is the owner of questionsoft.com. He is the first
[04:28.240 --> 04:36.000]  programmer that I've ever came across that was really more than just a programmer.
[04:37.600 --> 04:46.160]  Instead of just writing me code for what I asked for, the first thing he did was ask me about my
[04:46.160 --> 04:53.200]  business. He wanted to know how the business worked, how I intended for it to work. Instead of just
[04:53.200 --> 04:58.880]  writing me a piece of code, he wrote me a program that fit the way I wanted to do business.
[05:00.240 --> 05:06.720]  I was very pleased. He said, in all these years I've been trying to get programmers to build
[05:06.720 --> 05:13.360]  stuff for me, he's the first one who actually gave me good product, gave me better than I asked for.
[05:13.360 --> 05:26.320]  Because of that, I've got an underlying software up and working. We're now presenting it to
[05:28.480 --> 05:38.080]  developers who are developing paradigm-changing projects. I have been looking at these different
[05:38.080 --> 05:46.560]  what they call incubators and accelerators, companies that help new projects get started.
[05:46.560 --> 05:57.760]  They're all looking for disruptive, paradigm-shifting ideas and trying to get people to actually
[05:58.400 --> 06:07.680]  use this project to product test it out for me. I begin to understand why. Because for every new
[06:07.680 --> 06:14.800]  and different project that I can find out there, I find a hundred people starting businesses. They're
[06:14.800 --> 06:23.200]  just ordinary standard run-of-the-build businesses that already have a fixed structure in how to
[06:23.200 --> 06:31.840]  build a business, real estate and insurance and restaurants. Now I understand why these accelerators
[06:31.840 --> 06:42.720]  are looking for paradigm-changing businesses. I'm trying to find people who have a paradigm
[06:42.720 --> 06:49.040]  changing business because that generally takes somebody who spends a lot of time figuring out
[06:49.040 --> 06:58.480]  something totally new. If they're like me, what they wind up doing is use up all their time and money
[06:58.480 --> 07:08.400]  building something new. By the time they get their Apple all fixed and polished and ready to go,
[07:08.960 --> 07:22.080]  out of money. They need a way to generate some investment. This SEC tool, when I looked at
[07:22.080 --> 07:29.280]  generating investment, I started looking for investment back in 2017. Then this is before
[07:29.280 --> 07:38.080]  the Bitcoin crash. Everybody's pointing at blockchain as the way to go. I started looking
[07:38.080 --> 07:45.760]  into it. Even when the blockchain was doing extremely well, the one thing I kept going into
[07:45.760 --> 07:54.720]  is people looked at the SEC requirements. You could not read the code and figure out what
[07:54.720 --> 08:03.920]  the requirements were. The codes were written in a way to make sure you couldn't figure out
[08:03.920 --> 08:10.720]  what the requirements were. Now I read the Singaporean code and the Swiss code
[08:10.720 --> 08:20.640]  and an eighth grader could read that and make sense of it. Code addressing the exact same issues
[08:22.160 --> 08:28.560]  and these two codes were very easy to read. All of it very straightforward. Then when it went to the
[08:29.360 --> 08:36.640]  Excursion Exchange Commission, Code of Federal Regulations, Code 7, Section 17,
[08:36.640 --> 08:48.880]  it was simply impossible to read. In the three exemptions, the SEC has carved out three exemptions
[08:48.880 --> 08:57.840]  or the legislators have. Crowdfunding exemption, regulation A and regulation D. These are exemptions
[08:57.840 --> 09:08.560]  to full filing as a securities company. Filing as a securities company is very complex and
[09:08.560 --> 09:20.000]  very expensive. For guys just starting out, they put in these exclusions. The code to tell you
[09:20.000 --> 09:25.440]  what all you have to produce and all the requirements that you have to have to qualify
[09:25.440 --> 09:34.960]  under these conclusions is just impossible to reach. All three of them, first page, first
[09:36.000 --> 09:44.240]  paragraph, first sentence, first half of first sentence, directs you to another code.
[09:46.240 --> 09:52.000]  So it asks if you were in compliance with this code. So I read that. I don't know if I'm in
[09:52.000 --> 09:55.840]  compliance with that code. Now I got to jump out and go to this other code.
[09:56.720 --> 10:00.480]  And then that code asked me if I'm in compliance with three or four other codes.
[10:01.600 --> 10:08.560]  Before I get back to the second half of the first sentence, I'm about 50 questions in already.
[10:10.320 --> 10:14.080]  No human being can read this kind of convoluted nonsense and make sense of it.
[10:14.080 --> 10:22.320]  So we ran our questionnaire process over it and produced an online interactive questionnaire.
[10:23.120 --> 10:30.800]  You don't have to know anything about SEC code. Just answer the questions.
[10:32.320 --> 10:36.720]  The first sentence, it doesn't ask you if you're in compliance with this other code.
[10:37.680 --> 10:43.360]  We go to the other code and we walk through the requirements of that code. Did you do this?
[10:43.360 --> 10:47.920]  Did you do this? Did you do this? We never tell them what code it's in. We just ask them to do this.
[10:48.720 --> 10:53.680]  And for the most part, what those go to are certain disclosures that you have to make.
[10:54.720 --> 10:58.560]  So instead of asking, are you in compliance with this code over here, we ask,
[10:59.120 --> 11:04.720]  did you make this disclosure? Did you make this disclosure? And just walk down the list this way.
[11:04.720 --> 11:12.720]  It produces a checklist as an output. And everywhere you've answered a question in a way
[11:12.720 --> 11:19.520]  that indicates that you may not be in compliance, then that comes up in red.
[11:20.800 --> 11:24.480]  Something that you have to address. Did you provide this disclosure? If you say no,
[11:24.480 --> 11:29.280]  then it tells you you need to provide this disclosure. Once you can go through it and
[11:29.280 --> 11:34.720]  you don't get any red ones, then you're ready to file and you don't have to worry about missing
[11:34.720 --> 11:44.640]  anything. So I've been looking for people out there with ideas that I can use as crash dummies.
[11:46.000 --> 11:52.400]  Have them go through my codes, read my codes and read my question, go through my questionnaires
[11:52.400 --> 11:58.560]  and rip them to shreds for me. Tell me what's wrong with them so I'll know how to adjust
[11:58.560 --> 12:05.920]  them so that that's become more intuitive and effective. I have the call lines open. Our
[12:05.920 --> 12:13.440]  call in number is 512-646-1984. We'll have the call lines open all night. If you have a question
[12:13.440 --> 12:21.520]  or comment, give us a call. I do have a call on the board. Terry from Missouri. Been a long time,
[12:21.520 --> 12:29.760]  Terry. Yes, sir. Good evening, Randy. Been trying pretty hard to get to you and I sent you a nice
[12:29.760 --> 12:36.400]  long lengthy email and I know we've had a couple emails coming back and forth and have a talk to
[12:36.400 --> 12:47.520]  you probably since 2015, mainly due to illness. So, man, what I've got to talk about and what I
[12:47.520 --> 12:55.280]  need your help for is how to file a criminal complaint against some federal judges. Oh,
[12:57.200 --> 13:10.480]  that was great fun when I did that. You look up your local FBI office. Every FBI office will have
[13:10.480 --> 13:20.400]  a special agent in charge. The FBI have become secret police. If you go to the FBI and you try
[13:20.400 --> 13:26.400]  to file a complaint, the person you file it with won't identify himself. That's great.
[13:27.920 --> 13:32.800]  Yeah, that was not did not make me happy. So, I wasn't about to give a criminal complaint
[13:33.680 --> 13:39.760]  to Mr. Nobody or in this case, I called him secret agent Blue Tie because he had a garish
[13:39.760 --> 13:49.120]  or yellow garish blue tie. So, I backed out and said, okay, how can I give this to a living
[13:49.120 --> 13:57.680]  green human being? So, if you go on the local FBI website, there's only one name you can find
[13:59.200 --> 14:06.880]  and that name will be of the special agent in charge. That's good because he's the boss.
[14:06.880 --> 14:16.960]  So, you make up a criminal affidavit. You can go online and pull down a federal criminal complaint
[14:16.960 --> 14:28.560]  form. Okay. Just go to US courts forms criminal complaint. Just pulled it down the other day
[14:28.560 --> 14:34.640]  and I was trying to remember what the number of it was. Okay. But anyway, you can pull down a
[14:34.640 --> 14:41.520]  complaint. It looks like a motion that you'd file in the court has the same kind of heading on it
[14:41.520 --> 14:53.200]  except instead of motion, it has complaint. And if you will go to jurismprudence.website,
[14:53.200 --> 15:02.400]  I do have that one back up. And right at the very top, you'll see a right under the title,
[15:02.400 --> 15:10.160]  you'll see a reference to Cherokee County. Click that. That will take you to a criminal
[15:10.160 --> 15:18.960]  complaint folder. And in that folder, you'll find how I built criminal complaints. Yeah,
[15:18.960 --> 15:28.480]  because I've never done that. We are in the middle of two racketeering complaints that are on the
[15:28.480 --> 15:38.800]  court. And whoa, hold on, racketeering complaints. That's not exactly a complaint. That's a petition.
[15:38.800 --> 15:48.160]  That's a whole other animal. Right. I understand that. Okay. I've never filed a criminal complaint.
[15:48.160 --> 15:53.360]  I want to do it right. I want to take this to the grand jury in Springfield, Missouri.
[15:53.360 --> 16:01.440]  Okay. When you say grand jury, are you speaking to a state or federal grand jury?
[16:03.440 --> 16:08.800]  See, I didn't know there was a difference. I'm new at this aspect of it, and that's why I'm calling
[16:08.800 --> 16:17.440]  you. Okay. There is definitely a difference. We have both state and federal. Okay. If you're
[16:17.440 --> 16:25.200]  going to file a Federico, I guess I need to back up. I generally want a strategy.
[16:26.480 --> 16:35.120]  I want to know what I'm doing before I go in. And racketeering, what kind of racketeering are
[16:35.120 --> 16:44.240]  you speaking of? Okay. Okay. Racketeering in the state, racketeering in the fed. Racketeering in
[16:44.240 --> 16:53.280]  the fed. Oh, then you might want to look at filing your criminal complaints in the state.
[16:56.000 --> 16:58.960]  Hang on. I'm about to go to break. We'll be right back.
[17:03.920 --> 17:09.360]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by
[17:09.360 --> 17:16.080]  Central Texas Gun Works. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated.
[17:16.080 --> 17:21.360]  Everything helps to keep us on the air. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for
[17:21.360 --> 17:28.880]  graphs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation
[17:28.880 --> 17:35.680]  is a chance to win. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:35.680 --> 17:41.120]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on
[17:41.120 --> 17:47.040]  Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming
[17:47.040 --> 17:52.400]  on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And remember,
[17:52.400 --> 17:59.520]  every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[17:59.520 --> 18:05.920]  Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[18:05.920 --> 18:09.760]  we live in an us against them society. If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[18:09.760 --> 18:13.840]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[18:13.840 --> 18:17.360]  travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most
[18:17.360 --> 18:21.600]  importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[18:21.600 --> 18:26.000]  opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's
[18:26.000 --> 18:30.000]  Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with rule of law radio, has put together the most comprehensive
[18:30.000 --> 18:33.840]  teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold
[18:33.840 --> 18:37.760]  courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to
[18:37.760 --> 18:42.320]  ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's
[18:42.320 --> 18:47.040]  book, the Texas Transportation Code, the law versus the lie. They deal in audio of the original 2009
[18:47.040 --> 18:51.280]  seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for
[18:51.280 --> 18:55.520]  your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and
[18:55.520 --> 18:58.560]  together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[18:58.560 --> 19:28.160]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio on this Friday, the 13th day of December.
[19:29.520 --> 19:39.200]  Is this really Friday the 13th? 2019 and we're talking to Terry in Missouri about filing
[19:41.520 --> 19:48.560]  complaints against federal officials. Okay, the rule is take the state to the Fed and the Fed to
[19:48.560 --> 19:58.720]  the state. If you're after federal judges, you might first try filing against them in the state.
[20:00.640 --> 20:07.920]  Okay, that will give you, you know, nobody in the state is going to want to go after a federal
[20:07.920 --> 20:15.760]  judge. So you will be able to show concert and collusion on the part of state officials to shield
[20:15.760 --> 20:25.520]  federal officials from prostitution. A federal judge sits in a federal courthouse that sits in
[20:25.520 --> 20:34.400]  the state. No federal courthouse in the United States has been ceded to the federal government,
[20:36.160 --> 20:40.720]  except the one in D.C. which didn't need to be because that is the seat of government.
[20:40.720 --> 20:49.680]  In that court, the federal law applies and only the federal law. In all other federal courts,
[20:50.560 --> 21:00.080]  the state penal code applies to any actions that occur within that building because that building,
[21:00.080 --> 21:08.480]  just like your house, is in this state and any actors in that building are subject to the laws
[21:08.480 --> 21:19.840]  of this state. Do you remember a movie called The Presidio? Not necessarily, no sir. Okay,
[21:19.840 --> 21:25.920]  it was a movie about a murder on a marine base, the marine base in San Diego.
[21:27.760 --> 21:36.240]  The local sheriff investigated that, not the feds, not the army. In this movie, they had an army
[21:36.240 --> 21:42.240]  colonel who was head of the military police who worked with the sheriff, but the sheriff
[21:42.960 --> 21:49.600]  had jurisdiction, not the army. Now, while the army was part of the federal government,
[21:49.600 --> 21:58.960]  and that army base was a government base, that government base had not, the property of that
[21:58.960 --> 22:06.240]  base had not been ceded to the federal government, so the property still belonged to the state.
[22:08.080 --> 22:14.720]  And therefore, the state had original jurisdiction. If a crime is committed in the federal courthouse
[22:14.720 --> 22:23.280]  by a person who is in the federal courthouse, that's a state crime and not a federal crime,
[22:23.280 --> 22:33.840]  unless the crime that he commits is exclusively federal. Say you give the clerk a motion and the
[22:33.840 --> 22:38.000]  clerk doesn't file it and throws it in the trash, then that's a federal crime. It's also a state
[22:38.000 --> 22:44.000]  crime, but since it's a federal document, then it'll fall under either. But if the judge takes
[22:44.000 --> 22:51.040]  out a pistol and shoots somebody in the courtroom, he's not prosecuted in the fed. He's prosecuted
[22:51.040 --> 23:00.000]  in the state. So if a federal judge commits a criminal act against you, he's prosecuted in the
[23:00.000 --> 23:08.640]  state. Now, in the case of me filing against a federal judge, I did it in the fed, but I was
[23:08.640 --> 23:15.600]  after something else and not the judge specifically. It did hammer the judge pretty good, but technically,
[23:15.600 --> 23:23.280]  I don't think these guys even understood it. The feds didn't have jurisdiction because the crime
[23:23.280 --> 23:31.760]  I accused the judge of wasn't a federal crime. It was a state crime. So what do you want to
[23:31.760 --> 23:39.440]  charge these officials with? Well, that's a good question. I was going to start with what occurred.
[23:39.440 --> 23:48.480]  Maybe you can help me get to that point. Okay. 2014, I filed just a simple fair credit reporting
[23:48.480 --> 23:58.320]  act complaint. I used the Michael mirrors and I did a lot of open records requests because some of
[23:58.320 --> 24:05.760]  the companies that were showing up in my credit files, which were attached to the complaint,
[24:05.760 --> 24:14.080]  we never heard of. So I sent one open records request, one of several, directly to the Missouri
[24:14.080 --> 24:19.840]  Secretary of State. And I knew the attorney that worked there and met her. So I already knew her
[24:19.840 --> 24:28.000]  and it was mailed to directly to her name and her office. And I'd asked her specifically if there
[24:28.000 --> 24:36.240]  are entities by the three following exact spelled names, one of which is central trust bank, the
[24:36.240 --> 24:42.400]  other was central bank, and the other was soon county national bank. She wrote me back within
[24:42.400 --> 24:50.400]  about a week, signed her name to it. She said she did a search and it came up that central trust
[24:50.400 --> 24:58.560]  bank was not an entity. And she said that there is an entity, which I never even inquired about,
[24:59.680 --> 25:07.280]  by a name that is very, very similar to that name, and has its exact corporate title under four words
[25:08.880 --> 25:17.840]  called the, that's the first word, the central trust bank. So these guys are running. And as I
[25:17.840 --> 25:24.480]  shared with you on the email, I personally shared all this with Richard Cardford. He's looked at
[25:24.480 --> 25:30.960]  all the documents, can't believe it. They're running an imitated name on all their bank applications,
[25:30.960 --> 25:37.440]  credit card, debit card, retail installment loans and new card dealers has been going on for 40,
[25:37.440 --> 25:48.320]  50 years. Over 3000 false claims filed in Missouri associate circuit courts and goes on from there.
[25:48.320 --> 25:54.000]  Bankruptcies filed in Kansas City, Missouri, they don't want anybody to know about it. So
[25:55.200 --> 26:03.520]  in that fair credit reporting that case, the first judge, this may ring a bell, accidentally died of
[26:03.520 --> 26:12.160]  a heart attack in the federal courthouse. Maybe did, maybe didn't. He issued the case under the
[26:12.160 --> 26:23.120]  entity, Jerry D. Owens versus central bank. He died. Another, I was a transfer order issue,
[26:23.120 --> 26:28.960]  which was transferring all these cases that was assigned to Richard Doar, who's by the way,
[26:28.960 --> 26:36.080]  buried in your state. And it went to a Democrat, Obama appointee by the name of Douglas Harpool.
[26:37.680 --> 26:43.600]  Immediately, he took the entity name off of the complaint and all of the orders.
[26:44.320 --> 26:51.120]  And he and the attorney went forward with a fictitious name on all the orders and all the
[26:51.120 --> 26:59.040]  motions. I called them out on it and asked them under what authority they doing this. And at
[26:59.040 --> 27:06.080]  that time, Randy, I did know hardly that thing. They held an oral argument in the court building,
[27:07.040 --> 27:13.760]  allowed this attorney to stand up and said, both names were one of the same. And I have the two
[27:13.760 --> 27:21.040]  transcripts. My cousin was with me. So they changed the name to make that fictitious entity appear
[27:21.040 --> 27:30.880]  as the real entity. And then he issued an order with fictitious names on it. And then he had the
[27:30.880 --> 27:40.480]  court clerks issue a judgment with a fictitious name on it. And so we've gone from there and we
[27:40.480 --> 27:53.760]  filed a motion to vacate. We filed full finding. About to go up on an appeal. And they're okay.
[27:53.760 --> 27:57.840]  Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Back up and say that again. We lost you for a moment there.
[27:59.360 --> 28:06.640]  Okay. We filed. Yeah, myself and another gentleman who I bumped into accidentally
[28:06.640 --> 28:14.320]  had the same credit card with them, which it's not a credit card. It has a fictitious name on it.
[28:15.200 --> 28:23.920]  It's a counterfeit act this device. Simple as that. This whole thing is an extortion scheme
[28:23.920 --> 28:31.360]  that's unbelievable. Did you charge them with tampering with the government document in the
[28:31.360 --> 28:41.280]  state? No, I have not. There's a good chance in the state that you're dealing with debt collectors.
[28:43.600 --> 28:50.880]  Debt collectors are universally hated. So if you file against them in the state,
[28:52.080 --> 28:56.720]  there's a good chance you'll find somebody who's been hammered by these guys and looking for an
[28:56.720 --> 29:06.000]  opportunity to hammer them back. Okay. Okay. This is 2014. Is the case ongoing?
[29:07.440 --> 29:14.560]  Well, it is now. Hold on. What does that mean? Pardon me?
[29:14.560 --> 29:26.800]  Okay. I'm looking for statute of limitations. When you say it is now, was it? Now, let's pick
[29:26.800 --> 29:34.160]  this up when we come back from our sponsors. Hang on. We'll be right back. We're going to our
[29:34.160 --> 29:40.320]  sponsors and we do have our fundraiser going. We're about to run out of time on it. We haven't
[29:40.320 --> 29:47.280]  done well at all. Haven't produced near enough to keep this show going. So maybe as a Christmas
[29:47.280 --> 29:54.720]  present, you can go to Logos Radio Network and give a little present to this radio station
[29:54.720 --> 29:58.080]  so we can keep this thing on the air next year. We'll be right back.
[30:02.400 --> 30:07.280]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under the
[30:07.280 --> 30:12.800]  blood alcohol image. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers
[30:12.800 --> 30:18.880]  and a government cover-up in a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about
[30:18.880 --> 30:24.240]  yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms
[30:24.240 --> 30:30.080]  will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information
[30:30.080 --> 30:35.360]  to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to
[30:35.360 --> 30:41.600]  you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start
[30:41.600 --> 30:49.040]  over with StartPage. Ever hear the term fine farming? It's when cops find innocent people to
[30:49.040 --> 30:54.800]  bring in revenue and it's apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida. This case involves
[30:54.800 --> 31:00.400]  breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations. Recently,
[31:00.400 --> 31:05.360]  reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. State officials knew
[31:05.360 --> 31:09.680]  about it for two and a half years, but did nothing. In fact, the head of Florida's
[31:09.680 --> 31:15.360]  breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document the problem. A DUI conviction
[31:15.360 --> 31:19.840]  can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover-up has been exposed, perhaps Florida
[31:19.840 --> 31:25.040]  drivers can breathe a bit easier. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. More news and information at
[31:25.040 --> 31:30.640]  KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:55.280 --> 32:06.000]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[32:06.000 --> 32:12.240]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time.
[32:12.240 --> 32:18.000]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516. Let your light so shine before men that they may
[32:18.000 --> 32:23.920]  see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to reflect God's light and
[32:23.920 --> 32:29.440]  be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse
[32:29.440 --> 32:34.640]  Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:35.360 --> 32:40.000]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss
[32:40.000 --> 32:46.320]  one chapter per week. Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine
[32:46.320 --> 32:51.360]  as well as Christian character development. So mark your calendar and join us live on
[32:51.360 --> 32:58.400]  LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring and
[32:58.400 --> 33:10.000]  motivating discussion of the Scriptures. You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:10.000 --> 33:22.160]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm going to solve them to the head of government them.
[33:27.680 --> 33:37.520]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton from LogosRadio on this Friday the 13th day of December 2019 and
[33:37.520 --> 33:50.080]  we're talking to Terry in Missouri. Okay, we are in a state court and the original issue began in
[33:50.080 --> 34:02.880]  2014. Has the case been ongoing for this amount of time? Well, to keep us all on the same sheet
[34:02.880 --> 34:12.320]  of music. This judge had all these exhibits attached to the complaint. He asked me to do that. I did
[34:12.320 --> 34:21.360]  that. He said I stated a claim under fair credit and he proceeded with a fictitious name on court
[34:21.360 --> 34:27.120]  orders. He was caught. There's no way that a court can have jurisdiction over something that doesn't
[34:27.120 --> 34:36.720]  exist. That's the first duty of any court and so we filed a motion to vacate. Very well done
[34:36.720 --> 34:45.840]  between me and Richard Carnford for a void order and then the actual judgment was not signed by
[34:45.840 --> 34:51.760]  the judge. It was signed by two federal court clerks with a fictitious name on it to get me
[34:51.760 --> 34:58.400]  out of there so in the discussion. So it's about to go up on an appeal. The motion to vacate was
[34:58.400 --> 35:08.880]  filed about 90 days ago. Oh, wait a minute. Okay, hold on. Hold on. If it began in 2014, there is a
[35:10.320 --> 35:18.000]  time issue here. How are we still in court at this late date? Yeah, well the
[35:18.000 --> 35:23.600]  original, the order the judge issued was a void order to begin with. It was with a fictitious
[35:23.600 --> 35:28.560]  name on it so we filed. Wait a minute. Hold on. You didn't answer my question. I'm going to
[35:29.440 --> 35:40.720]  statute limitations. If this issue initiated in 2014, how are we still in court in 2019?
[35:40.720 --> 35:46.080]  I don't think I understand what you're asking.
[35:48.640 --> 35:54.880]  Well, it would seem like this would be adjudicated before that and when I asked you about the case,
[35:54.880 --> 36:02.560]  you said it was, I'm trying to find out if it was continuous. Has there been an action continuously
[36:02.560 --> 36:09.840]  going or was there a break and then a restart? Yeah, there was a break. Yeah. Okay, tell me about
[36:09.840 --> 36:18.800]  that break. Well, nothing happened. I was nearly on a death bed. Okay, well, and so I couldn't
[36:18.800 --> 36:26.960]  physically do anything. Okay, did you get, was there some kind of stay in the case? No.
[36:26.960 --> 36:39.760]  So it would either have to be a judgment in favor of the plaintiff
[36:42.080 --> 36:49.920]  or a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute after six months, then it becomes an unprosecutable
[36:49.920 --> 36:59.680]  house that's still in court. Well, that's a pretty good question.
[37:00.560 --> 37:08.080]  Yeah, did the other side move for a decision or determination? No.
[37:11.520 --> 37:14.960]  So they let it set for more than six months? Yes.
[37:14.960 --> 37:19.040]  Yes. How did it get started up again?
[37:21.200 --> 37:26.400]  By me filing the motion to vacate with the pictitious name on a bogus order.
[37:27.120 --> 37:33.360]  Okay, I want you to take the phone and beat yourself around the eyes and the ears.
[37:34.560 --> 37:39.280]  I go back and file a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute.
[37:39.280 --> 37:47.520]  Wow. Okay, motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute.
[37:48.240 --> 37:52.400]  Yes, they failed to prosecute for over six months. They'll have to show the judge a good cause
[37:54.400 --> 37:56.880]  and if they can't show good cause, it goes out the door.
[37:58.000 --> 38:00.480]  If you're dealing with a debt collector in a federal court,
[38:01.280 --> 38:06.160]  federal courts do not want to mess with debt suits. They want them out of their courts,
[38:06.160 --> 38:12.880]  just give them an excuse and then toss it. Yeah, well, I didn't sue a debt collector. I sued
[38:13.840 --> 38:17.520]  the bank itself, which is not a bank. No, no, no, no, no, it doesn't matter.
[38:18.080 --> 38:21.040]  The bank itself is acting in the capacity of debt collector.
[38:22.400 --> 38:29.120]  Wait, the bank was, this is a credit card? Yes. Okay, then the bank's a debt collector.
[38:30.000 --> 38:35.680]  Yes. So this is a debt collector suit. They don't care about debt collector suits.
[38:35.680 --> 38:40.400]  Now the banks have bought and paid for the judges in foreclosure issues because there's really big
[38:40.400 --> 38:48.320]  money there. Yep. But for a couple thousand dollars for a credit card, they didn't pay the judges for
[38:48.320 --> 38:54.160]  that. So the judges have thrown those out. So just move to dismiss for failure to prosecute.
[38:55.520 --> 38:58.160]  Okay. First thing to do.
[38:58.160 --> 39:06.640]  Have they filed a response to your latest meeting? Yes, they did.
[39:10.320 --> 39:17.440]  Did they file any kind of action to move the case forward? No, sir. No.
[39:18.240 --> 39:22.800]  Okay, then you may still be able to get by with a motion to vacate. I mean, I'm
[39:22.800 --> 39:29.520]  just a motion vacate. A motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. Okay. You're asked,
[39:29.520 --> 39:34.160]  your request that a ruling be tossed shouldn't have anything to do with the fact that they
[39:34.160 --> 39:41.440]  haven't prosecuted the issue in, what, four years? Yeah, four, over four years, yeah.
[39:42.160 --> 39:48.400]  Yeah, you should have, you should get a motion for failure to prosecute.
[39:48.400 --> 39:53.200]  Okay. And once judge ignores that, he's ignored everything else.
[39:55.280 --> 40:02.880]  Then you file a criminal against the judge for failure to properly apply the law to the facts.
[40:04.160 --> 40:09.040]  His only duty is to determine the facts in accordance with rules of evidence,
[40:09.920 --> 40:13.040]  then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[40:13.040 --> 40:22.320]  If he failed to do that, I have case law in Texas that you should be able to find similar
[40:22.320 --> 40:28.960]  case law in Missouri because this goes to the primary duty of the judge and what
[40:31.040 --> 40:41.440]  Walker v. Packer says, a judge has no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts of
[40:41.440 --> 40:50.320]  failure to do so is an abuse of discretion. Well, in every state, except Alabama, maybe,
[40:51.920 --> 40:57.920]  an abuse of discretion that has the effect of denying a citizen full free access to
[40:57.920 --> 41:04.880]  her enjoyment of a right is the act of official misconduct. And it's a crime in almost every
[41:04.880 --> 41:14.160]  state. Alabama doesn't have that statute. So if it happens in Alabama, you have to file in the
[41:14.160 --> 41:20.240]  Fed and I'm about to do that. I'm going to file criminal charges against a municipal judge
[41:21.680 --> 41:28.320]  because he refused to allow me to look at a court record that was sitting right in front of me
[41:28.320 --> 41:35.920]  because I was not a citizen of the state of Alabama. Well, I'm going to charge the judge
[41:35.920 --> 41:42.960]  with official misconduct, but I can't charge him in the state of Alabama because there are no
[41:44.560 --> 41:52.400]  laws against denial of due process in Alabama. So since it was a denial of due process,
[41:52.400 --> 41:59.840]  that rings in the Fed as well as in the state. So I'm going to file against that local municipal
[41:59.840 --> 42:12.400]  judge in Alabama with a special agent charge of the FBI in Tennessee. That's going to be a hoot.
[42:12.400 --> 42:22.800]  Okay. Okay. Back to filing criminal charges. If a public official fails to perform a duty,
[42:22.800 --> 42:27.680]  he's required to perform in the process as you full free access to her enjoyment of right,
[42:27.680 --> 42:35.440]  if he is acting in an official capacity, I'm sorry, if he is acting in a federal capacity,
[42:35.440 --> 42:51.680]  then his act falls under 18 U.S. Code 242. If he is in a facility that is not a federal enclave,
[42:53.680 --> 43:00.160]  i.e., a piece of property that has been ceded to the federal government,
[43:00.160 --> 43:06.960]  post offices tend to be belong to the federal government, and federal prisons belong to the
[43:06.960 --> 43:14.960]  federal government. That's so that the post office can use its postal inspectors to police
[43:14.960 --> 43:22.080]  the post office, and the federal prisons can hire their own security. They don't have to use,
[43:22.080 --> 43:28.240]  they can use federal officers instead of state police. Everything else is, it belongs to the
[43:28.240 --> 43:36.720]  state, is in the state. So in that case, you could file in either one. If it's a federal judge,
[43:37.520 --> 43:43.600]  he's acting in a federal capacity, but he's in this state when he acts in that federal capacity,
[43:43.600 --> 43:52.560]  so you could file in each one. I hope this makes sense. I can't do it in Alabama because
[43:52.560 --> 44:01.680]  Alabama state doesn't have a state statute. So, since a denomination, are you being harassed by
[44:01.680 --> 44:06.960]  debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now
[44:06.960 --> 44:12.160]  with the Michael Mirris proven method. Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against
[44:12.160 --> 44:17.440]  debt collectors, and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[44:17.440 --> 44:23.120]  on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phones,
[44:23.120 --> 44:27.840]  mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors
[44:27.840 --> 44:32.880]  out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you
[44:32.880 --> 44:38.720]  to go away. The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[44:38.720 --> 44:44.560]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[44:44.560 --> 44:51.920]  and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com
[44:51.920 --> 44:59.840]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[45:01.280 --> 45:06.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[45:06.160 --> 45:12.720]  with jurisdictionary. The affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in
[45:12.720 --> 45:19.680]  24 hours you step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you
[45:19.680 --> 45:25.520]  don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step
[45:25.520 --> 45:32.480]  course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years
[45:32.480 --> 45:38.480]  of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.480 --> 45:44.160]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[45:44.160 --> 45:51.840]  our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much
[45:51.840 --> 46:10.320]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:22.640 --> 46:31.680]  Okay, we are back. Randy Calhoun of Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, the 13th day of December
[46:31.680 --> 46:40.240]  2019 and we're talking to Terry in Missouri about filing criminal charges against a federal judge.
[46:40.240 --> 46:49.600]  So, before you file criminal charges, before you stir this pot too much,
[46:51.200 --> 46:55.440]  do the motion to vacate because you don't want the judge to pee old at you.
[46:57.600 --> 47:02.480]  The motion to vacate will most likely get rid of this thing since it's a debt collector case.
[47:02.480 --> 47:12.320]  What is the amount of the claim? Well, the credit card was stolen. I never knew that I was out of
[47:12.320 --> 47:22.480]  the country trying to take care of my health. So, how much was the claim that was made against you?
[47:22.480 --> 47:32.000]  Pardon me, sir? How much was the claim that was made against you? About $1,500.
[47:33.120 --> 47:41.920]  Missouri. Kansas City, Missouri. Debt collector went after a woman for $1,200.
[47:43.360 --> 47:48.160]  She told him, it wasn't her, they got the wrong person, somebody else with the same name.
[47:48.160 --> 47:57.120]  Yeah. They didn't listen. They were so nasty with her that a jury rendered a ruling
[47:58.480 --> 48:08.400]  for $80 million, I think $82 million against the law firm. Yeah. These are debt collectors.
[48:08.400 --> 48:18.880]  They are not the court's favorite people. So, motion to vacate, you might file a
[48:18.880 --> 48:25.760]  counterfeit against them. Did you check your credit to see if they had pulled your credit?
[48:26.480 --> 48:33.680]  Yes, several times. Well, go back to Michael Mears. That's a federal crime.
[48:33.680 --> 48:39.040]  Yes. I have a friend that they dropped $30,000
[48:40.240 --> 48:48.480]  credit card, paid $6,000 to get her to drop the claim against them for pulling their credit.
[48:49.360 --> 48:55.360]  Yes, I know. Have you filed criminal charges against them for pulling the credit and a counter
[48:55.360 --> 49:06.240]  suit? Okay. Okay. If they pulled your credit, look at Michael Mears' stuff. He talks about that.
[49:07.120 --> 49:12.480]  If they did a hard pull on your credit, that's a fine. That's a federal crime. That's a felony crime.
[49:13.360 --> 49:24.320]  Yes, we know. Okay. Then you can move against them for that in the trial court, but don't do
[49:24.320 --> 49:32.640]  anything until you filed a motion to vacate for failure to prosecute. Then you can file against
[49:32.640 --> 49:39.920]  them. If the judge denies it, then you file against them for pulling the credit. If the judge
[49:39.920 --> 49:44.560]  dismisses it, then you sue them for pulling the credit and you file criminally against them.
[49:44.560 --> 49:53.440]  Get them to come to the table and make a deal to get you just to not pursue the federal complaint.
[49:55.520 --> 50:02.560]  That's what happened in the French case. In whose case? I can't say the name. She just
[50:02.560 --> 50:11.840]  don't want me to tell, but this is a woman who fought them and they dropped us. They
[50:11.840 --> 50:21.360]  retired a debt on a $30,000 debt on a credit card. They paid her $6,000 to get her to drop
[50:21.360 --> 50:30.320]  her claim against them for pulling her credit. Pulling credit after they started the collection
[50:30.320 --> 50:43.760]  is a really big deal. Okay. You got nice claims. Forget the argument about the wrong people.
[50:43.760 --> 50:50.160]  They did it. Leave them in there. Go ask them for what they did under the name that they're using.
[50:50.160 --> 50:56.640]  Don't muddy the waters by trying to change the name. No, they changed the name. It doesn't
[50:56.640 --> 51:04.000]  matter. Leave it alone until you... If I come to you and beat you up and I say I got one name
[51:04.000 --> 51:08.560]  and then you decide I got another name, then I'm going to say, well, you don't get to sue. You come
[51:08.560 --> 51:15.360]  after me under this name. You claim I'm another name, so you can't come after me for that.
[51:15.920 --> 51:22.400]  These guys did a credit pull after they started collections. That's a felony.
[51:22.400 --> 51:33.040]  Yes. Well, in addition to that, Randy, they placed two fictitious names in all three of my credit
[51:33.040 --> 51:46.080]  files for four years. Okay. What do you want to do? You want to beat them up? Do you want the suit to
[51:46.080 --> 51:57.680]  go away? Pardon me? What do you want at the end of the day? For you, what would be a win for you?
[51:59.280 --> 52:05.120]  Everything that is legally owed to me under the Fair Credit Reporting Act for the daily
[52:05.120 --> 52:18.480]  ongoing violation. Okay. You're not going to win that. Why? You're never going to get everything
[52:18.480 --> 52:28.720]  you want. What for you would be a win? Well, let's talk about something that you can actually get.
[52:28.720 --> 52:37.920]  If you go for something that's the absolute maximum possible you're going to lose and you're going
[52:37.920 --> 52:48.640]  to feel like you lost, what for you would be the least amount that you can consider a win?
[52:48.640 --> 53:00.720]  Well, I guess I haven't considered that yet. Do that. Once you get past that point, now you
[53:00.720 --> 53:07.600]  can work. But if you don't know what a win is, you're always going to be asking for more and
[53:07.600 --> 53:11.680]  you're not going to get there. You're never going to win everything you want. That's just all the
[53:11.680 --> 53:18.880]  risk to that. The courts are never going to let you have everything we want. This woman who won
[53:18.880 --> 53:24.560]  this $80 million judgment, they appealed it immediately and the court threw it out.
[53:26.880 --> 53:33.520]  The jury knew that the court was throwing out. They were making a statement. We had a guy in
[53:33.520 --> 53:44.400]  Weatherford County drunk, went across the center medium on I-30 hit, or I-20 hit, a car full of
[53:44.400 --> 53:54.240]  teenagers, killed five of them. He survived. The next guy gets one first DUI in Weatherford County.
[53:54.240 --> 54:05.440]  The jury gave him 99 years. Now he appealed it and the court threw it out. But they were making
[54:05.440 --> 54:12.480]  a statement. So you hear all these outrageous lawsuits where they win outrageous amounts of
[54:12.480 --> 54:18.720]  money. Well, that sounds good. But at the end of the day, the vast majority of times, they don't
[54:18.720 --> 54:28.560]  wind up with squat. Figure out something that would be a win for you. What would be the least
[54:28.560 --> 54:39.040]  amount that would be a win? You have something you can measure by. You don't have to quit there.
[54:39.040 --> 54:41.040]  You just know when you're on the upside.
[54:41.040 --> 55:00.480]  Okay. I don't mean to be difficult, but you're doing something that I see a lot and it frustrates
[55:00.480 --> 55:09.280]  me. You get in a fight and the credit card company does something and you do something and
[55:09.280 --> 55:20.240]  the judge does something and you feel like they keep violating your rights and abusing you.
[55:21.040 --> 55:28.080]  If you're not careful, at some point it stops being about winning your case and it becomes
[55:28.080 --> 55:36.240]  about the fight. We have Tina on that. She sent a woman to me from Florida and they're foreclosing
[55:36.240 --> 55:46.000]  on her house. Tina sent her to me so I could help her. But all she could do was tell me about,
[55:46.000 --> 55:49.760]  they did this to me. They did this to me. They did this to me. They did this to me. I said,
[55:49.760 --> 55:54.720]  okay, I got all that. What do you want to do? What do you want at the end of the day? Well,
[55:54.720 --> 55:58.800]  yeah, but they did this to me. They did this to me. They did this to me. All she could do was talk
[55:58.800 --> 56:09.520]  about how badly she was mistreated. For her, it stopped being about winning a case and it became
[56:09.520 --> 56:16.480]  about the fight. They have mistreated me so much I want to pay them back. She's going to lose her
[56:16.480 --> 56:25.280]  house, wind up out on the street trying to pay them back. If you want to win a case, pick something
[56:25.280 --> 56:36.000]  you can win. If you can get past that, wonderful. But have a place to go to. Otherwise, you'll
[56:36.000 --> 56:47.120]  always be fighting. You'll never win. Okay. How important is the fact that they're using the
[56:47.120 --> 56:57.840]  wrong name? Why do you even care about that? Well, we have a fictitious name on a credit card
[56:57.840 --> 57:02.880]  application that's a limitation of an entity. So what? That's what I thought was important.
[57:03.680 --> 57:14.000]  So what? Why is it important? Okay, so ignore that and go on to the other. No, I'm trying to,
[57:14.000 --> 57:20.080]  I'm talking about a way to think about this. Yeah, that's wrong. And that's something you can get to.
[57:21.440 --> 57:30.160]  But always, why is it important? How does that help me get to an outcome I want to get to?
[57:31.120 --> 57:40.160]  Right. Okay. If using the wrong name is just a technical thing and at the end of the day,
[57:40.160 --> 57:45.680]  it doesn't make any difference. I don't want to have that fight. And the other side, they would
[57:45.680 --> 57:49.600]  love for you to have that fight. They want you to have a fight. Don't make any difference.
[57:50.800 --> 57:53.600]  And they'll fight you all day because they'll keep you in court and you'll never win it.
[57:56.240 --> 58:04.160]  Figure out what you want. Look at everything you do. No matter how miserable they make you feel,
[58:04.160 --> 58:12.800]  no matter how mistreated you may feel. If you look at that objectively and say, if I win this,
[58:12.800 --> 58:21.520]  will I win my outcome? And if you can't say you'll win your outcome, don't go after it.
[58:21.520 --> 58:26.880]  I had a bailiff shoved me out the door of the courthouse, knocked me down, broke my elbow.
[58:26.880 --> 58:34.240]  And he didn't mean to. He was pretty upset at me and I had put him over the edge.
[58:35.440 --> 58:39.920]  But I looked at that and thought, okay, if I go after this bailiff and knock me down,
[58:39.920 --> 58:47.600]  break my elbow, how is this going to lead me toward my intended outcome? Hang on,
[58:47.600 --> 58:53.120]  about to run off cliff. Be right back. Would you like to make more definite progress in your
[58:53.120 --> 58:59.440]  walk with God? Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian
[58:59.440 --> 59:04.320]  books that can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive
[59:04.320 --> 59:09.600]  study Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of foot
[59:09.600 --> 59:14.960]  notes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three
[59:14.960 --> 59:20.800]  volume set called basic elements of the Christian life. Chapter by chapter, basic elements of the
[59:20.800 --> 59:26.880]  Christian life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build
[59:26.880 --> 59:32.720]  up the church to order your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the
[59:32.720 --> 59:46.080]  Christian life. Call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit us
[59:46.080 --> 59:55.120]  online at bfa.org. Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.720 --> 01:00:04.560]  The following is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.480 --> 01:00:12.640]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold $1,429
[01:00:12.640 --> 01:00:20.960]  an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.960 --> 01:00:29.280]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.280 --> 01:00:45.440]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31 and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:46.080 --> 01:00:52.560]  Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[01:00:52.560 --> 01:00:58.400]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing 10 and
[01:00:58.400 --> 01:01:07.600]  entering 40. Today in history. In recent news since Governor Greg Abbott signed House bill
[01:01:07.600 --> 01:01:13.280]  1325 legalizing Hepin attacks his law back in June county prosecutors around the state including
[01:01:13.280 --> 01:01:17.920]  Houston, Austin and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing
[01:01:17.920 --> 01:01:22.880]  to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment
[01:01:22.880 --> 01:01:28.160]  to test the year for THC. Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this
[01:01:28.160 --> 01:01:33.120]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:01:33.120 --> 01:01:38.000]  law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter to
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:42.960]  county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas
[01:01:42.960 --> 01:01:49.760]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HV1325 works as well as other cities too
[01:01:49.760 --> 01:01:56.000]  like the district attorney in El Paso, Cayman Esparza a Democrat who also stated earlier this
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:01.920]  month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.920 --> 01:02:06.880]  However the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball an assistant public defender
[01:02:06.880 --> 01:02:11.360]  in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[01:02:11.360 --> 01:02:16.080]  illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something
[01:02:16.080 --> 01:02:25.280]  the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five and
[01:02:25.280 --> 01:02:31.200]  a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico. The specimen being
[01:02:31.200 --> 01:02:36.320]  only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way
[01:02:36.320 --> 01:02:41.920]  back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper the shark secretes a
[01:02:41.920 --> 01:02:49.040]  luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey
[01:02:49.040 --> 01:02:58.160]  may be drawn into the glow. This was Wolf Rody with your lowdown for July 22nd 2019.
[01:03:05.440 --> 01:03:08.960]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:08.960 --> 01:03:38.720]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[01:03:38.720 --> 01:03:45.600]  rule of law radio. Brett is with us now and we're talking to Terry in Missouri and
[01:03:46.560 --> 01:03:53.360]  Terry what I'm talking about now is really not about the details of this case but how to think
[01:03:53.360 --> 01:04:04.800]  about the case. And it is so important that you pick an outcome and then lead toward it.
[01:04:04.800 --> 01:04:12.640]  When this bailiff broke my elbow I had had a written stated purpose and I've
[01:04:12.640 --> 01:04:17.920]  repeated that on the air a lot of times. It is my purpose to place every judge in the country
[01:04:17.920 --> 01:04:23.360]  in a position such that when they step up behind the bench look out across the bar at the gallery
[01:04:23.360 --> 01:04:28.000]  and want them wondering which one which one of those gondals sitting out there waiting for me
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:35.440]  to render a ruling he doesn't like so he can run down and try to get me indicted. That's my intended
[01:04:35.440 --> 01:04:42.720]  ultimate outcome so I looked at that and I said okay I got a good shot at this bailiff.
[01:04:42.720 --> 01:04:47.040]  I can sue the Crapola out of him and I'll absolutely win.
[01:04:47.040 --> 01:04:58.640]  But how will going after this bailiff lead me toward my stated intended
[01:04:59.280 --> 01:05:10.560]  ultimate outcome? I could not find any way to frame what had occurred in a way that would
[01:05:10.560 --> 01:05:18.480]  lead me toward my ultimate outcome. So I decided not to go after the bailiff and two weeks after
[01:05:18.480 --> 01:05:23.200]  this occurred I went to the prosecution attorney's office because I knew him real well and I was in
[01:05:23.920 --> 01:05:28.160]  Marm was in a sling he said oh Mr. Kelton how are you feeling? I said well I've been better.
[01:05:29.520 --> 01:05:33.040]  He said are you going to go after Dick? The guy's name was Dick Woods.
[01:05:33.040 --> 01:05:42.800]  I said I thought about it decided that it wouldn't lead me toward any intended outcome that I was
[01:05:42.800 --> 01:05:54.000]  trying to achieve and besides I didn't want to ruin a man's 20-year career over a minor mistake.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:05.040]  It turned out to be the most powerful thing I'd ever done in that county. After that everybody
[01:06:05.040 --> 01:06:15.760]  took me serious. So in your case how will getting them to change the name lead you toward your
[01:06:15.760 --> 01:06:26.240]  ultimate outcome? Okay that's a pretty good question because if we put the correct if we put
[01:06:26.240 --> 01:06:32.320]  the entity back on there then perhaps I have the opportunity to go back and re-litigate the case.
[01:06:33.760 --> 01:06:39.600]  Yeah well you know all it would do is cause them to have to change the name you sense you'd be in
[01:06:39.600 --> 01:06:49.680]  the same place you would otherwise be. So how do you do something that will win your case?
[01:06:51.200 --> 01:06:57.840]  That if you get a ruling in your favor will give you outcome you want to get to and I'm really not
[01:06:57.840 --> 01:07:05.760]  talking about anything in particular but about a way to think about things. When you bring something
[01:07:05.760 --> 01:07:13.280]  to the judge the judge is going to be sitting there thinking so what? Yeah they did this wrong
[01:07:13.280 --> 01:07:21.760]  they did that wrong so what? You have to tell the judge they did this wrong and because they
[01:07:21.760 --> 01:07:30.400]  did this wrong it gives me this claim or this cause of action and under this cause of action
[01:07:30.400 --> 01:07:38.240]  you have a duty to give me this ruling. So it's not that they did this so how does that harm you?
[01:07:38.240 --> 01:07:47.040]  What difference does it make? Always weigh everything that way the one thing that will
[01:07:48.160 --> 01:07:54.480]  be the most benefit is decide on an outcome and everything you do weigh it against that
[01:07:54.480 --> 01:08:02.160]  outcome will just get me there. You know I say this I'm a combat veteran then in combat you
[01:08:02.160 --> 01:08:07.520]  don't get to get into fight just cause you want to you don't even get into a fight just cause you
[01:08:07.520 --> 01:08:18.000]  can win it because winning the fight will use up resources if that fight doesn't lead you toward
[01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:27.920]  your intended outcome then you're just wasting resources and certainly don't get into a fight
[01:08:27.920 --> 01:08:34.560]  you either cannot win or don't have an exit strategy for. In combat you only get to screw
[01:08:34.560 --> 01:08:44.320]  that one up once so back up decide where you're going before you take any step ask yourself how
[01:08:44.320 --> 01:08:54.080]  will this lead me toward my outcome in your case I'm going to say first thing motion to dismiss
[01:08:54.080 --> 01:09:01.840]  for failure to prosecute then if they move ahead and then subject matter jurisdiction challenge
[01:09:04.480 --> 01:09:11.520]  instead of a motion to vacate subject matter jurisdiction this entity by this name
[01:09:11.520 --> 01:09:22.880]  does not exist therefore this entity has no power to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of this
[01:09:22.880 --> 01:09:31.040]  court correct that's how I would go after if that was an important issue that's how I go after
[01:09:31.040 --> 01:09:38.240]  because you get a win they're out of here right right and they can't they can't just change their
[01:09:38.240 --> 01:09:46.080]  name whatever name is on that petition can't be changed well they did then that should get a
[01:09:46.080 --> 01:09:55.600]  subject matter jurisdiction challenge yeah and before you do that see if you can get the whole
[01:09:55.600 --> 01:10:01.920]  thing thrown out then then this issue becomes a boot I didn't hear you Randy repeat that please
[01:10:02.560 --> 01:10:07.360]  I said first thing you do see if you can get the whole thing thrown out if you can get the whole
[01:10:07.360 --> 01:10:14.400]  thing thrown out on a motion of it to motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute then all these
[01:10:14.400 --> 01:10:26.240]  other matters become moot irrelevant don't matter and then you can file suit against reporting act
[01:10:26.240 --> 01:10:35.360]  date when you when they sued you did you file a counter complaint no sir okay so you can get
[01:10:35.360 --> 01:10:41.440]  it dismissed that means your counter complaint complaint hasn't been dismissed you get it dismissed
[01:10:41.440 --> 01:10:49.040]  if they dismiss it then you sue them for malicious prosecution have you bargained the attorneys
[01:10:50.320 --> 01:10:59.120]  who would that be uh somebody's name if this is a bank a bank's name cannot sign the
[01:10:59.120 --> 01:11:08.480]  the documents the filings it has to be a lawyer on it right bar grieve that lawyer
[01:11:10.240 --> 01:11:15.520]  he'll poop his britches do it again because that a stinging big time
[01:11:17.520 --> 01:11:23.520]  bar grieve quick bar grieve often every time they file a pleading grieve them for something
[01:11:23.520 --> 01:11:28.480]  about that pleading so you guys want to have a fight with me let's see how much I can cost
[01:11:28.480 --> 01:11:35.920]  you first bar grievance is likely to cost the lawyer about 12 to 15 thousand dollars a year
[01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:44.800]  second one is going to cost him his malpractice insurance all together okay what if we can
[01:11:44.800 --> 01:11:49.680]  and complain third one to make it so no law firm in in the their right mind will hire him
[01:11:49.680 --> 01:11:58.800]  and what if we file canon complaint against these judges how many will it take to get them
[01:11:58.800 --> 01:12:08.320]  for someone else to look at what they're doing okay that's a whole different process yep these
[01:12:08.320 --> 01:12:15.280]  judges are all bought and paid for they'll all protect each other you have to get out of the
[01:12:15.280 --> 01:12:23.280]  judge's purview and into another purview and that goes to grand jurors yes judge don't hear
[01:12:23.280 --> 01:12:29.760]  anything say about that this is a process in order to get to the grand jury you have to get
[01:12:29.760 --> 01:12:39.200]  past the u.s. attorney and to get past the u.s. attorney you need the u.s. attorney to interfere
[01:12:39.200 --> 01:12:46.320]  or intercept your complaint to the grand jury so what I like to do is file a complaint with the
[01:12:48.240 --> 01:12:55.520]  special agent in charge and when I send the complaint I put in a cover letter and
[01:12:56.480 --> 01:13:02.880]  as an information request and I ask him to send me complete records of all the investigations
[01:13:02.880 --> 01:13:10.880]  performed consequent to this complaint well I'm not going to get anything so I wait a couple weeks
[01:13:12.080 --> 01:13:16.960]  and then I file criminal charges against special agent in charge with the grand jury
[01:13:18.080 --> 01:13:26.000]  and I mail it to the grand jury the federal grand jury to the foreman of the grand jury
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:34.560]  registered restricted I cost about 15 bucks restricted means only the foreman can sign for it and
[01:13:36.240 --> 01:13:43.520]  insurance for for another five bucks for 500 bucks okay I put I put a cover letter in there
[01:13:43.520 --> 01:13:53.520]  asking the foreman to initial this letter and send or postcard if it's a letter and put it in
[01:13:53.520 --> 01:14:00.240]  the stamp self-addressed envelope that's included and return it to you so that you will know he
[01:14:00.240 --> 01:14:04.960]  actually received it because we have problems with prosecuting attorneys tackled from the
[01:14:04.960 --> 01:14:09.600]  government documents by secreting criminal complaints against public officials from the grand
[01:14:09.600 --> 01:14:17.680]  jury and we want you to initial it not sign it because the u.s. attorney has a rubber stamp
[01:14:17.680 --> 01:14:24.560]  with your name on it that he uses to stamp the super sheet indictments now they're going to
[01:14:24.560 --> 01:14:30.480]  sign the guidance in the mail rooms going to sign for this the he's going to send it up to the
[01:14:30.480 --> 01:14:34.880]  prosecutor attorney's office prosecutor turns going to open it and he's going to see that letter
[01:14:34.880 --> 01:14:41.440]  telling the foreman that the prosecutor has a rubber stamp with his name on it the last thing
[01:14:41.440 --> 01:14:49.760]  he wants is that foreman to find out that he's got a rubber stamp so you're not going to get this
[01:14:49.760 --> 01:14:57.280]  letter back you wait a couple weeks that gives you reasonable probable cause to believe that either
[01:14:58.240 --> 01:15:05.920]  the foreman did not get this document or the foreman did not act on this document
[01:15:05.920 --> 01:15:13.200]  so you assume that since it's mailed to the prosecution attorney's office that's prosecuting
[01:15:13.200 --> 01:15:19.120]  attorney intercepted it and make up a criminal complaint against the prosecuting attorney for
[01:15:20.160 --> 01:15:27.680]  tampering with a government document i'm sorry before you do that you call the postal inspectors
[01:15:28.240 --> 01:15:35.600]  and you say hey i want my 500 bucks and they say why well i sent this to the former grand jury
[01:15:35.600 --> 01:15:39.440]  with a cover letter and i didn't get that cover letter back letter back so i don't think foreman
[01:15:39.440 --> 01:15:46.720]  got it and i insured it 500 bucks paid them a 500 bucks and they're not going to repeat 500 bucks
[01:15:47.360 --> 01:15:52.320]  because if they do their bond rating goes up so they're going to send postal inspectors down
[01:15:52.320 --> 01:16:00.480]  there to stomp all over these guys he's going to be down asking the prosecute attorney where did
[01:16:00.480 --> 01:16:06.640]  this go it was sent registered restricted it's supposed to be signed for by the foreman where to
[01:16:06.640 --> 01:16:16.240]  go and then the next one you send you send it to the foreman again the same way except this
[01:16:16.240 --> 01:16:21.040]  time it's a criminal complaint against the prosecuting attorney accusing the prosecuting
[01:16:21.040 --> 01:16:26.720]  attorney of secreting criminal complaints against the public official from the grand jury
[01:16:26.720 --> 01:16:33.520]  and he's going to get that one and it's going to have same cover letter on it
[01:16:34.640 --> 01:16:40.160]  he's going to look at that and say these count will set me up yes we did
[01:16:42.640 --> 01:16:50.240]  and okay we're running out of time but that's the process there's more
[01:16:50.240 --> 01:16:58.400]  to follow that there is 28 usc 535 which i'm going to i'll pick that up on the other side
[01:17:03.920 --> 01:17:09.360]  it's the 2019 logos radio network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by
[01:17:09.360 --> 01:17:16.080]  central texas gunworks go to logosradio network dot com and enter to win any amount is appreciated
[01:17:16.080 --> 01:17:21.360]  everything helps to keep us on the air from central texas gunworks the grand prize up for
[01:17:21.360 --> 01:17:28.240]  graphs is a spikes tactical ar 15 more prizes and sponsors to be announced every 25 dollar
[01:17:28.240 --> 01:17:34.560]  donation is a chance to win when you purchase randy kelton's ebook legal 101 you get four
[01:17:34.560 --> 01:17:40.160]  chances to win purchase eddie craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win if you've
[01:17:40.160 --> 01:17:45.440]  enjoyed the shows on logos radio network support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the
[01:17:45.440 --> 01:17:51.440]  best quality programming on talk radio today we also accept bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies
[01:17:51.440 --> 01:17:58.400]  and remember every 25 dollar donation is a chance to win go to logos radio network dot com for details
[01:17:58.400 --> 01:18:04.720]  and donate today i love logos without the shows on this network i'd be almost as ignorant as my
[01:18:04.720 --> 01:18:09.760]  friends i'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back i need my truth fit i'd be lost
[01:18:09.760 --> 01:18:15.040]  without logos and i really want to help keep this network on the air i'd love to volunteer as a show
[01:18:15.040 --> 01:18:20.000]  producer but i'm a bit of a lie and i really don't have any money to give because i spent it all on
[01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:26.400]  supplement how can i help logos well i'm glad you asked whenever you order anything from amazon
[01:18:26.400 --> 01:18:31.360]  you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts first thing you do is clear your
[01:18:31.360 --> 01:18:38.800]  cookies now go to logos radio network dot com tick on the amazon logo and book market now when you
[01:18:38.800 --> 01:18:45.680]  order anything from amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos do i pay extra no do i have
[01:18:45.680 --> 01:18:52.400]  to do anything different when i order no can i use my amazon prime no i mean yes wow giving
[01:18:52.400 --> 01:18:59.200]  without doing anything or spending any money this is perfect thank you so much we are welcome happy
[01:18:59.200 --> 01:19:15.200]  holidays logos the logos the logos radio network
[01:19:15.680 --> 01:19:17.200]  ain't gonna fly me
[01:19:21.200 --> 01:19:23.200]  don't want me
[01:19:23.200 --> 01:19:25.200]  do
[01:19:27.920 --> 01:19:29.200]  well
[01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:40.720]  ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again i was blindsided but now i can see your
[01:19:40.720 --> 01:19:56.720]  hand you put the fear in my pocket took the money from my hand ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:20:11.440 --> 01:20:27.680]  okay we are back randy kelton brett fountain rule of law radio and we're talking moe in
[01:20:27.680 --> 01:20:35.840]  Missouri okay moe that's the first part of that this okay when i was going out of mission 28
[01:20:35.840 --> 01:20:44.240]  usc 535 they probably don't even know that exists and this is i didn't find this one of my listeners
[01:20:44.240 --> 01:20:51.280]  called it found this and brought it to me and i thank them sincerely for it it's been great fun
[01:20:52.880 --> 01:21:00.240]  it sounds like a whistleblower statute what it says is is that if a federal if a public
[01:21:00.240 --> 01:21:07.120]  i'm sorry if a federal official has knowledge that another federal official has violated a law
[01:21:07.840 --> 01:21:14.000]  not law relating to his office but a law he is to give notice to the u.s attorney general
[01:21:15.600 --> 01:21:21.360]  so it bypasses his chain of command and goes straight to the u.s attorney general so
[01:21:22.800 --> 01:21:29.360]  you file a criminal complaint against the special agent charge when you you file the
[01:21:29.360 --> 01:21:33.440]  complaint with the special agent charge when you don't get a response back you file a complaint
[01:21:33.440 --> 01:21:41.200]  against him with the u.s attorney well u.s attorney under 28 usc 535 is required to give notice to
[01:21:41.200 --> 01:21:48.720]  the u.s attorney general now he probably he's the guy who would prosecute so he figures he
[01:21:48.720 --> 01:21:59.680]  don't have to know notify anybody but 28 usc 535 has no exclusion for prosecutors so you file a
[01:21:59.680 --> 01:22:05.600]  information request with the attorney general in dc and when you don't get a response from the
[01:22:05.600 --> 01:22:09.840]  attorney general then you file a complaint against the attorney general with the local
[01:22:09.840 --> 01:22:21.920]  grand jury through the district attorney you see how it it really muddies things up yeah
[01:22:21.920 --> 01:22:27.360]  well that's exactly what we want to do and we've been having problems trying to find out who the
[01:22:27.360 --> 01:22:35.280]  four person is you don't care who the four person is the four person's name is four person that's
[01:22:35.280 --> 01:22:44.400]  all you care okay and only got one it can only be interpreted as one human being you don't care
[01:22:44.400 --> 01:22:52.240]  who it is all right and we also will get to filing criminal charges against the four person
[01:22:52.800 --> 01:22:58.880]  if the prosecutor says oh yeah i gave up to the grand jury your next complaint is to the
[01:22:58.880 --> 01:23:05.600]  prosecutor against the foreman of the grand jury and i was talking to a prosecutor in wise county
[01:23:06.720 --> 01:23:13.200]  about filing against the foreman because i file criminal charges against him and against the public
[01:23:13.200 --> 01:23:18.480]  official and never heard anything from them and i said i need name of the form of the grand jury
[01:23:18.480 --> 01:23:25.120]  so i'm file criminal charges against him oh mr kelton and this is berry green oh mr kelton
[01:23:25.120 --> 01:23:31.120]  please don't mess with my grand jury they're hard enough to see it as it is
[01:23:34.960 --> 01:23:43.760]  the idea of going after a grand jury foreman is a hoot it's all politics you start stirring up
[01:23:44.640 --> 01:23:47.920]  all kinds of politics they're going to want you to go away
[01:23:47.920 --> 01:23:56.880]  that's my last my last case in austin they dismissed it because i caused much trouble
[01:23:56.880 --> 01:23:59.840]  they dismissed it to protect my lawyer from me
[01:24:03.840 --> 01:24:07.200]  you are the most powerful son of a gun in the courthouse
[01:24:08.720 --> 01:24:14.880]  you start going right for their throats the do you know whatever u.s attorney must do when a new
[01:24:14.880 --> 01:24:20.560]  president takes office i think he follows the new oath of office i'm not sure randy
[01:24:21.840 --> 01:24:31.760]  no he files a resignation oh really president trump has a resignation signed by every u.s
[01:24:31.760 --> 01:24:40.720]  attorney who was in office when he got there if this u.s attorney was appointed by a democrat
[01:24:40.720 --> 01:24:51.040]  oh yeah and the president has his resignation all he needs is an excuse to toss him out and
[01:24:51.040 --> 01:24:57.760]  appoint a republican well see that's what we're trying to do with these uh two democrat obama
[01:24:57.760 --> 01:25:05.120]  appointee federal judges this crooked is the day is long have you filed judo chicanda complaints
[01:25:05.120 --> 01:25:11.200]  against him no sir i didn't know how to do that i was not aware of that because of the health issue
[01:25:11.200 --> 01:25:21.920]  so we're right now wanting to do that okay uh we really need to hang on i'm going to bring somebody
[01:25:21.920 --> 01:25:38.800]  else on okay uh we need to talk to brett but this guy here billy there yes okay yes i'm here hello
[01:25:40.240 --> 01:25:47.200]  there you go okay bill i got i got terry on a missouri and he is trying to learn how to take
[01:25:47.200 --> 01:25:58.880]  these guys on uh will you uh i understand you have some crowing to do so oh yeah absolutely yeah
[01:25:58.880 --> 01:26:10.400]  it was uh yeah tell us the whole story oh it's going uh in ten words less right right um
[01:26:10.400 --> 01:26:18.400]  um let's see from the beginning or just what happened yesterday if now give us give us a
[01:26:18.400 --> 01:26:28.240]  synopsis so we understand the position that you're in okay so uh well it was in 2000 2017 i got a
[01:26:28.240 --> 01:26:37.040]  speeding ticket and uh i had a friend who said hey you want to you want to fight this and uh i told
[01:26:37.040 --> 01:26:45.200]  him well uh he said how much does it cost about like 200 dollars he goes well come on and uh what
[01:26:45.200 --> 01:26:50.800]  do you got to lose man even i think he even put up half of it i'll put up half of it if you lose and
[01:26:50.800 --> 01:26:59.120]  so uh anyhow i started i followed a i started filing these motions with the court and uh i
[01:26:59.120 --> 01:27:05.840]  ended up going to my free trial of motions hearing and this was in 2018 and uh i just got
[01:27:05.840 --> 01:27:15.120]  completely railroaded completely railroaded and uh the uh the judge was a complete he was a complete
[01:27:15.120 --> 01:27:21.600]  he's very very rude he patronized me belittled me in the court didn't he didn't even read any of the
[01:27:21.600 --> 01:27:31.200]  motion it was just it was terrible well uh i refused to plea and um i refused to plea and i
[01:27:31.200 --> 01:27:36.080]  really didn't want to um i tried to get them to put everything into writing into the record which
[01:27:36.080 --> 01:27:41.520]  they refused to do and they tried to get me to argue these these motions in court and i told
[01:27:41.520 --> 01:27:47.600]  me you know i submitted these motions months prior and uh there's no reason to talk about it you
[01:27:47.600 --> 01:27:52.080]  know what do you think about it and so they didn't read it they didn't know and they're just trying
[01:27:52.080 --> 01:27:58.640]  to make you seem like you're you know some crazy person ranting well once i didn't i you know
[01:27:58.640 --> 01:28:05.600]  objective to oral arguments and anything that they want to uh i said just write it down put it in
[01:28:05.600 --> 01:28:13.200]  the record so i can look at it make decisions make it not like that and so um anyhow the judge
[01:28:13.760 --> 01:28:21.200]  started getting really upset with me because i wouldn't i wouldn't argue in court and and so he
[01:28:21.200 --> 01:28:25.680]  he went and he said well i hear about it enter in a plea and not guilty for you since you won't
[01:28:25.680 --> 01:28:34.240]  plea and uh smack the gavel and whatnot and he stormed off well i went uh adam and i went back
[01:28:34.240 --> 01:28:40.720]  to the house and we're looking at uh we're looking at uh kind of looking at the law and stuff and
[01:28:40.720 --> 01:28:48.480]  sure enough you know he can't do that he can't enter in a plea uh you know only only only at the
[01:28:48.480 --> 01:28:54.080]  day of the trial after the jury's been impaneled the only time he can do it and so i knew that and
[01:28:54.080 --> 01:29:01.040]  and i filed a judicial conduct complaint on the judge the first one was for him being like terse
[01:29:01.040 --> 01:29:05.840]  and you know rude and whatnot and they did they dismissed that one but the second one was for
[01:29:05.840 --> 01:29:13.440]  the the plea that he had entered and uh they took it up they sent me letters back saying they were
[01:29:13.440 --> 01:29:19.920]  investigating it and all that well yesterday uh i never heard anything else back from the court
[01:29:19.920 --> 01:29:28.320]  and i called them and then i finally uh they finally and this is 26 months later they finally
[01:29:28.320 --> 01:29:39.440]  schedule a another pretrial and it's with the prosecutor and uh anyhow he had he holds the
[01:29:39.440 --> 01:29:48.080]  faux pretrial without a judge present and uh summoned me to it and all these things well
[01:29:48.080 --> 01:29:53.920]  it was yesterday yesterday okay wait wait hold on hold on i'm gonna have a cliffhanger
[01:29:53.920 --> 01:29:56.480]  gotta go to break all right we'll be right back
[01:30:03.200 --> 01:30:08.240]  since 9 11 our government has used invasive measures like warrantless phone taps to keep
[01:30:08.240 --> 01:30:12.720]  us safe from terrorists but too much government surveillance could actually put us at greater
[01:30:12.720 --> 01:30:19.120]  risk i'm dr catherine albrecht and i'll be back with the unsettling truth in just a moment privacy
[01:30:19.120 --> 01:30:24.320]  is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again and once
[01:30:24.320 --> 01:30:30.240]  your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so protect your rights
[01:30:30.240 --> 01:30:36.480]  say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging on to
[01:30:36.480 --> 01:30:41.360]  this public service announcement is brought to you by startpage dot com the private search engine
[01:30:41.360 --> 01:30:49.360]  alternative to google yahoo and bin start over with start page our greatest threat isn't terrorists
[01:30:49.360 --> 01:30:54.480]  it's government according to political science professor rj rummel 20th century governments
[01:30:54.480 --> 01:30:59.440]  murdered nearly 300 million of their own citizens six times more than all the centuries war is
[01:30:59.440 --> 01:31:05.360]  combined and governments that kill have one thing in common too much power surveillance is government
[01:31:05.360 --> 01:31:09.360]  power and historically governments have used surveillance to protect themselves rather than
[01:31:09.360 --> 01:31:14.560]  citizens if you think such abuse couldn't happen in the u.s just look back to watergate join me in
[01:31:14.560 --> 01:31:18.960]  opposing the patriot act and let's return to the best protection of federal government with
[01:31:18.960 --> 01:31:24.320]  limited powers in accordance with the u.s constitution i'm dr catherine albrecht more news
[01:31:24.320 --> 01:31:34.880]  and information at catherine albrecht dot com this is building seven a 47 story skyscraper that fell
[01:31:34.880 --> 01:31:40.560]  on the afternoon of september 11 the government says that fire brought it down however 1500 architects
[01:31:40.560 --> 01:31:45.440]  and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition over 6000 my fellow service members
[01:31:45.440 --> 01:31:50.160]  have given their lives of thousands of my fellow first responders of dying i'm not a conspiracy
[01:31:50.160 --> 01:31:54.160]  theorist i'm a structural engineer in new york city correction office i'm an air force pilot i'm a
[01:31:54.160 --> 01:32:00.880]  father who lost his son we're americans and we deserve the truth go to rememberbuilding7.org today
[01:32:00.880 --> 01:32:06.960]  rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic similar in today's america we live in
[01:32:06.960 --> 01:32:10.880]  an us against them society if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going
[01:32:10.880 --> 01:32:15.280]  to have to stand and defend our own rights among those rights are the right to travel freely from
[01:32:15.280 --> 01:32:19.280]  place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due
[01:32:19.280 --> 01:32:24.080]  process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and
[01:32:24.080 --> 01:32:28.560]  preserve our rights through due process former sheriff's deputy a craig in conjunction with rule
[01:32:28.560 --> 01:32:32.240]  law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[01:32:32.240 --> 01:32:36.480]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law you can get your own
[01:32:36.480 --> 01:32:41.120]  copy of this invaluable material by going to rule law radio dot com and ordering your copy today
[01:32:41.120 --> 01:32:45.200]  by ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation code the law versus
[01:32:45.200 --> 01:32:49.680]  the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents and
[01:32:49.680 --> 01:32:53.360]  other useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[01:32:53.360 --> 01:32:57.920]  from rule of law radio dot com order your copy today and together we can have the free society
[01:32:57.920 --> 01:33:08.320]  we all want and deserve looking for some truth you found it logos radio network dot com
[01:33:27.920 --> 01:33:55.040]  okay we are back randy kelton brett fountain rule law radio and we're talking to bill and terry
[01:33:55.040 --> 01:34:02.960]  terry i wanted you to hear what happened to bill okay where were you bill we were getting to the
[01:34:02.960 --> 01:34:10.400]  cliffhanger all right here we go here we go so i go into the trial this is it this is this is uh i
[01:34:10.400 --> 01:34:17.040]  go into the trial yesterday and uh i'd file two motions the motion to reconsider the original
[01:34:17.040 --> 01:34:25.280]  motions and then a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute and lack of speed trial well um a day
[01:34:25.280 --> 01:34:33.040]  prior to the to the case uh the um the prosecutor finally responded i got a letter from him and he
[01:34:33.040 --> 01:34:40.720]  was talking about it was his response to the lack of uh to the denial of speed trial and within that
[01:34:40.720 --> 01:34:48.320]  he started stating the barker rules and uh are the barker equation and uh he went through and the
[01:34:48.320 --> 01:34:56.000]  first one he gave me was 26 months yeah thank you and then the second one it was he said that it was
[01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:03.200]  the second element of the barker is uh or the factor is that um you have to show that it was
[01:35:03.200 --> 01:35:08.400]  due to the government's delay and not the defendant well there he blames it on me he said it was due
[01:35:08.400 --> 01:35:14.480]  to my motion and uh it was due to my motion and it was also due to the judicial conduct complaint
[01:35:15.040 --> 01:35:21.440]  well okay so i'll take you into the courtroom in the courtroom i sat there and uh the night
[01:35:21.440 --> 01:35:27.920]  before i typed out what i was going to say i laid into this prosecutor's so hard i brought up the
[01:35:27.920 --> 01:35:32.400]  fact that said i think it's kind of funny that you're saying that the motion delayed anything
[01:35:32.400 --> 01:35:37.520]  because you never responded anything and even in your own response you said that the motions
[01:35:37.520 --> 01:35:43.200]  decided to ponder in the trial so how does that hold you up right there and uh i said well now
[01:35:43.200 --> 01:35:48.880]  that we put that one to bed the judicial conduct complaint and i asked him would i so this would
[01:35:48.880 --> 01:35:53.520]  have gone a lot better and i would have got a fair trial or it would have gone just smoother if i
[01:35:53.520 --> 01:35:58.320]  hadn't filed the conduct complaint or if the judge hadn't entered in the plea it's not guilty
[01:35:58.320 --> 01:36:03.280]  before the day of the trial there's kind of silence there the visiting judge or the appointed
[01:36:03.280 --> 01:36:10.960]  judge by mr stollfield was uh he was just watching he was just listening and uh i said i could i you
[01:36:10.960 --> 01:36:16.560]  know i'm really kind of uh taking back on that i was kind of letting know i said this prosecution
[01:36:16.560 --> 01:36:22.080]  has done the only defense the prosecution has is blaming the defendant for everything that was wrong
[01:36:22.080 --> 01:36:29.280]  blaming the defendant for uh not proceeding with his own prosecution and so and moving the court
[01:36:29.280 --> 01:36:36.320]  and all these things moving forward just prosecution well uh going to the third one the third uh
[01:36:37.520 --> 01:36:45.760]  third factor is that um you have to enter in the um you have to bring up the fact that you
[01:36:45.760 --> 01:36:50.960]  have to write to a speedy trial and i said that i say if you read it every one of these motions
[01:36:50.960 --> 01:36:56.080]  i put in there's an there's an assertion of all my rights that i'd bring it up right there that i
[01:36:56.080 --> 01:37:01.200]  retained all my rights i waived none of them and that's in every single one of these motions that i
[01:37:01.200 --> 01:37:07.200]  put up i said so there's three factors that we have right there and the fourth the fourth is
[01:37:07.200 --> 01:37:15.280]  to prevent the fourth factor is to prevent any type of anxiety or uh it's like a detriment to the
[01:37:15.280 --> 01:37:20.880]  account that you it's kind of like with your memory you know you don't want to it's to keep it fresh
[01:37:20.880 --> 01:37:26.720]  and all that and i said well and i told the i told the judge and said we'll look at it like this i
[01:37:26.720 --> 01:37:36.000]  came into this court a single man i said and today here i am 2019 i'm married and i have a 15 month
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  child i said and that's that's how long that's what's changed in here that's how long this has
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:49.040]  gone on and i and then at this one point this uh that prosecutor i said this is how low this
[01:37:49.040 --> 01:37:56.960]  prosecution has got that he's resorted to name calling i said he in his response he says that uh
[01:37:57.520 --> 01:38:03.120]  that i brought up facts that sovereign citizens bring up and i told the court i said i don't know
[01:38:03.120 --> 01:38:08.960]  what that term is said so i have to look it up and i said and i cannot believe it i'm almost
[01:38:08.960 --> 01:38:14.560]  speechless that a man right here i'm being accused of being a domestic terrorist in court
[01:38:14.560 --> 01:38:20.400]  because i stood up for my right and because i'm over here doing what needs to do what the right
[01:38:20.400 --> 01:38:29.040]  thing to do and uh i i said i can't believe you that i said that's that's just completely pitiful
[01:38:29.040 --> 01:38:36.560]  i said that's pitiful pitiful unprofessional behavior and you definitely owe me an apology on
[01:38:36.560 --> 01:38:45.920]  this one i i mean it was an hour long rant of me completely tearing into this guy and so uh when
[01:38:45.920 --> 01:38:51.920]  it's all said and done i understand where i understand the mistakes i made i wanted to talk
[01:38:51.920 --> 01:38:58.320]  about that and there was a question about that too but i'll sum up the story uh the judge denied
[01:38:58.320 --> 01:39:05.200]  the motion for speedy trial and uh i knew right there i was like oh no you know oh here we go
[01:39:05.200 --> 01:39:11.360]  and uh i said uh and then i hear a cough from the back there's a little adam in there he coughed
[01:39:11.360 --> 01:39:17.360]  and i was like all right here we go and i said bailiff i said uh bailiff could you come over
[01:39:17.360 --> 01:39:22.000]  here and he looks at me like what and everybody the judge and the prosecutor's like oh no what's
[01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:29.840]  doing and uh i went uh could you serve this paper to the to the to the court and serve this one to
[01:39:29.840 --> 01:39:36.640]  the prosecutor and as soon as they got it i said uh your honor i hereby waive my right to trial by
[01:39:36.640 --> 01:39:42.000]  jury this is going to be decided by you and uh that's it you know are you absolutely sure you
[01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:48.720]  can make this make this uh uh submit this i said yes sir this is a this is not a motion this is
[01:39:48.720 --> 01:39:56.080]  this is just my right this is something i'm fully that this is a hundred percent me anyhow he was i
[01:39:56.080 --> 01:40:02.000]  think in the back of his mind was like he never saw it coming oh man good play and so uh anyhow
[01:40:03.360 --> 01:40:09.280]  he calls in the jury calls all i think there's like 30 people or something there and he dismisses
[01:40:09.280 --> 01:40:18.320]  him and uh anyhow he said he asked me he said uh well have you tried to make a deal with the
[01:40:18.320 --> 01:40:25.840]  prosecutor and i said well i said no and uh he said well would you like to try to look at those
[01:40:25.840 --> 01:40:30.400]  turn around look at that i'm all like well he's like come on man yeah let's go see what he has to say
[01:40:31.280 --> 01:40:38.240]  so uh judge left the quarters went outside kind of uh you know to kind of you know take a little
[01:40:38.240 --> 01:40:46.400]  break and uh get a drink of water anyway uh he had uh came back in prosecutor i said what are we
[01:40:46.400 --> 01:40:53.920]  doing here what do you want to do he says well all right we can do 125 with uh court cost and i said
[01:40:53.920 --> 01:41:00.720]  how about $50 and he's like and i said no court cost he goes well i could do $50 with court cost
[01:41:00.720 --> 01:41:07.040]  maybe we'll see what the judge says and i was like all right yeah and so uh we go up there and the
[01:41:07.040 --> 01:41:15.680]  judge uh the judge says um as well if y'all uh come to uh an agreement he thought through yesterday
[01:41:15.680 --> 01:41:23.120]  we have we decided uh $50 uh and the judge says okay he tells the clerk uh well can you go print me
[01:41:23.120 --> 01:41:31.120]  out a a deferment uh a deferment uh paper and she goes yes sir would you like me to uh would you
[01:41:31.120 --> 01:41:38.320]  like to put the $50 in there and he looks at that lady he goes just go get the paper and uh if you
[01:41:38.320 --> 01:41:45.840]  walk out she comes back and gets the paper and uh he goes over there and he says uh well he says
[01:41:45.840 --> 01:41:53.760]  $50 and uh well how about zero dollars and he uh he writes zero on there and he goes and as far as
[01:41:53.760 --> 01:41:59.440]  court cost he looked at me and says i think you put up with enough zero dollars for that as well
[01:42:00.400 --> 01:42:08.640]  and uh and that was it got my copies and walked out looked prosecutor i was like ha ha ha it was
[01:42:08.640 --> 01:42:17.360]  awesome but it was it was great it was great uh yeah so i think you put up with enough and
[01:42:17.920 --> 01:42:24.560]  i think that makes a real good statement that the judge is not really the monster
[01:42:25.840 --> 01:42:32.080]  that it's misconduct complaints and keep following them on these judges and get these people maybe
[01:42:32.080 --> 01:42:39.120]  where the insurance companies start looking at them now how do we know right he's pardon me go
[01:42:39.120 --> 01:42:43.920]  ahead go ahead yeah how we know these insurance companies who are they how do we get in touch with
[01:42:43.920 --> 01:42:53.360]  them oh well you don't really need to you got to understand the insurance company has a agent and
[01:42:53.360 --> 01:43:01.840]  it is the agent's primary purpose to charge his client as much as possible and avoid any claims
[01:43:03.120 --> 01:43:12.080]  so he's just looking for a reason to increase his premium or but disqualify an actor
[01:43:14.080 --> 01:43:20.320]  keep his premium the same and decrease his risk well the reason why i'm asking you all about this
[01:43:20.320 --> 01:43:27.680]  at this point is it a friend of mine in Orlando filed six uh judicial misconduct claims on a federal
[01:43:27.680 --> 01:43:37.920]  judge in Philadelphia and they actually got rid of him he became a political liability this is all
[01:43:37.920 --> 01:43:45.520]  politics and hang on we're about to go to another break i'll talk about the politics when we come
[01:43:45.520 --> 01:43:52.960]  back okay so i can eliminate my claim okay hang on go on to break randy keldon
[01:43:53.760 --> 01:44:03.680]  brutal grip ah i'm gonna shut up now through advances in technology our lives have greatly
[01:44:03.680 --> 01:44:09.520]  improved except in the area of nutrition people feed their pets better than they feed themselves
[01:44:09.520 --> 01:44:15.280]  and it's time we changed all that our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic
[01:44:15.280 --> 01:44:21.360]  environment is good nutrition in a world where natural foods have been irradiated adulterated
[01:44:21.360 --> 01:44:27.360]  and mutilated young jevity can provide the nutrients you need logos radio network gets
[01:44:27.360 --> 01:44:32.880]  many requests to endorse all sorts of products most of which we reject we have come to trust
[01:44:32.880 --> 01:44:39.200]  young jevity so much we became a marketing distributor along with alex jones ben fuchs and
[01:44:39.200 --> 01:44:45.520]  many others when you order from logos radio network dot com your health will improve as you
[01:44:45.520 --> 01:44:52.080]  help support quality radio as you realize the benefits of young jevity you may want to join us
[01:44:52.080 --> 01:44:58.240]  as a distributor you can experience improved health help your friends and family and increase your
[01:44:58.240 --> 01:45:06.160]  income order now are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney
[01:45:06.160 --> 01:45:12.560]  with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand four cd course that will show you how
[01:45:12.560 --> 01:45:20.000]  in 24 hours death by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:26.320]  have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our step by step course
[01:45:26.320 --> 01:45:33.040]  and now you can too jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[01:45:33.040 --> 01:45:38.480]  winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should
[01:45:38.480 --> 01:45:44.240]  understand about the principles and practices that control our american courts you'll receive
[01:45:44.240 --> 01:45:52.480]  our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases pro se tactics and much more
[01:45:52.480 --> 01:46:08.400]  please visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the banner are called toll free 866 law easy
[01:46:22.560 --> 01:46:34.400]  easy
[01:46:34.400 --> 01:46:56.400]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we're off our radio and we're talking to Bill
[01:46:56.400 --> 01:47:04.280]  and Terry. Okay, unmuting. Okay, Terry, I kind of wanted you to hear that.
[01:47:04.280 --> 01:47:09.280]  Yeah, I appreciate you. You can win.
[01:47:09.280 --> 01:47:11.280]  Go ahead.
[01:47:11.280 --> 01:47:17.280]  A judicial misconduct complaint and judicial cannons complaint.
[01:47:17.280 --> 01:47:27.280]  Well, the cannons make up the where you can file. The cannons are just like the things they agree to.
[01:47:27.280 --> 01:47:35.280]  They could, that's what they have to adhere to are the cannons.
[01:47:35.280 --> 01:47:44.280]  Yeah, all of the cannons of judicial ethics, they all say the judge should do this and the judge should do that.
[01:47:44.280 --> 01:47:50.280]  Makes it really vague. You know, when you see a red light, you should stop.
[01:47:50.280 --> 01:47:58.280]  You see a speeding, I mean, you see a speed zone, you should slow down. How does that work?
[01:47:58.280 --> 01:48:03.280]  So the judges have made it so that they're not really required to do anything.
[01:48:03.280 --> 01:48:16.280]  However, the, you know, I keep saying on the show, you'll never win your case simply because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:48:16.280 --> 01:48:27.280]  To think so is naive. I suggest to you, Bill, that had you not filed judicial conduct complaints against the judge,
[01:48:27.280 --> 01:48:30.280]  there's no way you'd won that case.
[01:48:30.280 --> 01:48:32.280]  I agree.
[01:48:32.280 --> 01:48:34.280]  God is attention.
[01:48:34.280 --> 01:48:36.280]  I never knew this, Landy.
[01:48:36.280 --> 01:48:49.280]  You will only win your case if you have the politics on your side and all, all, okay, hold on, Bill, hold on, Bill, let me explain.
[01:48:49.280 --> 01:48:52.280]  Let me on their show talking about this.
[01:48:52.280 --> 01:48:54.280]  Hold on, Bill, hold on, Bill.
[01:48:54.280 --> 01:48:56.280]  We have a suppressor on this system.
[01:48:56.280 --> 01:48:59.280]  They don't like that.
[01:48:59.280 --> 01:49:11.280]  Okay, Bill, we have a suppressor on this system. If I'm talking and you're talking, the suppressor will push you down underneath me and it will shut your sound off.
[01:49:11.280 --> 01:49:17.280]  So if you want to speak, make a noise and then I'll finish what I'm saying and then I'll go back to you.
[01:49:17.280 --> 01:49:22.280]  If we both try to talk at once, it just shuts you off.
[01:49:22.280 --> 01:49:32.280]  Okay, you only win your case if you have the politics on your side and all politics is local.
[01:49:32.280 --> 01:49:39.280]  That is not a problem unless you don't know that it's all about politics.
[01:49:39.280 --> 01:49:45.280]  Once you understand it's about politics, everything changes and that's what Adam understands.
[01:49:45.280 --> 01:49:48.280]  Adam's the guy who helped Bill.
[01:49:48.280 --> 01:49:53.280]  And if you were listening last night, you heard Adam on the show.
[01:49:53.280 --> 01:49:56.280]  He's come to understand this all about politics.
[01:49:56.280 --> 01:50:08.280]  And Terry, every federal judge sitting on the bench, for the most part, aspires to be an appellate court judge.
[01:50:08.280 --> 01:50:14.280]  Because from being an appellate court judge, you can move on up to the Supreme.
[01:50:14.280 --> 01:50:25.280]  But there are so many federal judges who are aspiring to a appellate court bench that how do you decide which one to move up?
[01:50:25.280 --> 01:50:33.280]  You've got 10 judges here. They both have the same education, the same experience.
[01:50:33.280 --> 01:50:37.280]  Oh, this is the guy, three or four judicial conduct complaints against him.
[01:50:37.280 --> 01:50:40.280]  Well, that's a reason to throw him out.
[01:50:40.280 --> 01:50:43.280]  He's a political liability.
[01:50:43.280 --> 01:50:51.280]  Now, the fact that the judicial conduct complaints were all frivolous is irrelevant.
[01:50:51.280 --> 01:50:55.280]  Terry, are you ever in the military?
[01:50:55.280 --> 01:50:57.280]  No, sir.
[01:50:57.280 --> 01:50:59.280]  Bill, were you?
[01:50:59.280 --> 01:51:01.280]  No, sir.
[01:51:01.280 --> 01:51:04.280]  This is how it worked in the military.
[01:51:04.280 --> 01:51:07.280]  I used to call the Inspector General all the time.
[01:51:07.280 --> 01:51:13.280]  And my NCLIC got in big, big trouble.
[01:51:13.280 --> 01:51:24.280]  Not because he did anything wrong, but because one of his troops was calling the Inspector General.
[01:51:24.280 --> 01:51:29.280]  Can't you handle your troops?
[01:51:29.280 --> 01:51:41.280]  They don't care why I called the Attorney General. They only care that I did and that my supervisor didn't do something to make sure that didn't happen.
[01:51:41.280 --> 01:51:45.280]  Valid, invalid, they don't care.
[01:51:45.280 --> 01:51:57.280]  And when politicians look at appointing a federal judge to appellate court bench, they don't care why these complaints were filed against it.
[01:51:57.280 --> 01:52:04.280]  They're going to say to the judge, you need to conduct yourself in such a way so that you don't get these.
[01:52:04.280 --> 01:52:09.280]  If you can't conduct yourself in a way so that you don't get these, then you're a political liability.
[01:52:09.280 --> 01:52:13.280]  We're going to move up somebody who can.
[01:52:13.280 --> 01:52:17.280]  Now, that is patently unfair.
[01:52:17.280 --> 01:52:21.280]  Yeah, life is tough. Deal with it.
[01:52:21.280 --> 01:52:28.280]  Once we figure out that it's all politics, then that is not a problem.
[01:52:28.280 --> 01:52:36.280]  You can beat them up big time. Terry, you know what happens to a lawyer if you file a bar grievance against them?
[01:52:36.280 --> 01:52:40.280]  Well, I've done it, but I don't know what happens.
[01:52:40.280 --> 01:52:51.280]  The state bar will get that bar grievance and they will throw it in the trash and they'll send you back this letter that says we examined in your accusation by it does not rise to the level of misconduct.
[01:52:51.280 --> 01:52:53.280]  I probably got a hundred of them.
[01:52:53.280 --> 01:52:56.280]  Only a hundred?
[01:52:56.280 --> 01:53:02.280]  I haven't. I'm not to Scott Richardson. He's the one that got crazy on that.
[01:53:02.280 --> 01:53:07.280]  Scott Richardson sent me a stack of bar grievances three inches tall.
[01:53:07.280 --> 01:53:13.280]  Yeah, I use those letters back from them so that my son has something to scribble on.
[01:53:13.280 --> 01:53:19.280]  So the bars are going to get it and they're going to throw it in the trash.
[01:53:19.280 --> 01:53:35.280]  However, if a lawyer gets a bar grievance or if a lawyer has any reason to believe that he could possibly be sued over an issue, he must notify his insurance carrier.
[01:53:35.280 --> 01:53:40.280]  If he doesn't and he subsequently sued, he's not insured.
[01:53:40.280 --> 01:53:46.280]  So you don't need to know who their insurance carrier is. You file against them, they have to notify.
[01:53:46.280 --> 01:53:59.280]  And the insurance carrier's got this agent there who's just looking for a reason to raise the premium or disqualify a bad risk.
[01:53:59.280 --> 01:54:04.280]  They're the same as the insurance carriers on your car.
[01:54:04.280 --> 01:54:11.280]  You see you buy a new car, you go down to Walmart, you go inside, you come out and somebody's backed into offender and bashed it in.
[01:54:11.280 --> 01:54:17.280]  You call the insurance company, not your fault, they come out, they fix it, they raise your rates.
[01:54:17.280 --> 01:54:22.280]  You go down next month, somebody bashes in another one. They come out, they fix it, they cancel it.
[01:54:22.280 --> 01:54:27.280]  Your fault, their fault, nobody's fault, they don't care.
[01:54:27.280 --> 01:54:32.280]  You are an unacceptable risk.
[01:54:32.280 --> 01:54:38.280]  There are two bar grievances. One bar grievance, your first year of practice, they cancel immediately.
[01:54:38.280 --> 01:54:41.280]  Valid, invalid, they don't care.
[01:54:41.280 --> 01:54:45.280]  Two bar grievances, any one year of practice, they cancel.
[01:54:45.280 --> 01:54:49.280]  Three, they cancel your law firm's malpractice insurance.
[01:54:49.280 --> 01:54:59.280]  Three bar grievances against you and no reputable law firm in the country will hire you on a bet.
[01:54:59.280 --> 01:55:04.280]  Valid, invalid, nobody cares.
[01:55:04.280 --> 01:55:08.280]  Here's the conduct complaints sent you the same way.
[01:55:08.280 --> 01:55:15.280]  Professional conduct complaints against a police officer.
[01:55:15.280 --> 01:55:18.280]  Six, toast.
[01:55:18.280 --> 01:55:22.280]  Valid, invalid, nobody cares.
[01:55:22.280 --> 01:55:25.280]  You get six professional conduct complaints.
[01:55:25.280 --> 01:55:30.280]  The insurance carrier, the bond carrier for the jurisdiction is going to come to the jurisdiction and say,
[01:55:30.280 --> 01:55:37.280]  you got this guy in your employ who has all these professional conduct complaints against him.
[01:55:37.280 --> 01:55:43.280]  If you keep this guy, we're going to raise your bond rating on all of your officers.
[01:55:43.280 --> 01:55:47.280]  So what do you think is going to happen to that cop?
[01:55:47.280 --> 01:55:50.280]  Hopefully he gets fired.
[01:55:50.280 --> 01:55:54.280]  Would you like fries with this burger?
[01:55:54.280 --> 01:55:57.280]  That is patently unfair.
[01:55:57.280 --> 01:56:01.280]  Oh yeah, life is tough dealing with it.
[01:56:01.280 --> 01:56:08.280]  So first thing to do, file a professional conduct complaint against a police officer.
[01:56:08.280 --> 01:56:13.280]  Scott Richardson does that and two of them disappeared.
[01:56:13.280 --> 01:56:17.280]  Two county sheriff's deputies, he filed against them.
[01:56:17.280 --> 01:56:21.280]  The next time he goes to court, the officer's gone.
[01:56:21.280 --> 01:56:25.280]  They told the sheriff, I'm out of here.
[01:56:25.280 --> 01:56:30.280]  You send me out there to write these tickets and I do exactly what you told me to do.
[01:56:30.280 --> 01:56:33.280]  And I get a professional conduct complaint against me.
[01:56:33.280 --> 01:56:37.280]  I get six of those and I can't be hired as a police officer.
[01:56:37.280 --> 01:56:40.280]  My career's over.
[01:56:40.280 --> 01:56:42.280]  And the sheriff's going to say, oh, they weren't valid.
[01:56:42.280 --> 01:56:45.280]  It don't make any difference.
[01:56:45.280 --> 01:56:52.280]  Now, is that, am I professing dirty tricks?
[01:56:52.280 --> 01:56:55.280]  You bet I am.
[01:56:55.280 --> 01:57:03.280]  I spent a long time asking everybody about what the most stinking, rotten, low-down things we could do to these guys are.
[01:57:03.280 --> 01:57:06.280]  We got stacks of it.
[01:57:06.280 --> 01:57:08.280]  You can win your case, Jerry.
[01:57:08.280 --> 01:57:15.280]  Because it's getting late, gentlemen, I'm going to give you my email address, anything you guys have.
[01:57:15.280 --> 01:57:17.280]  I'm partially disabled.
[01:57:17.280 --> 01:57:19.280]  I live in a bed, guys.
[01:57:19.280 --> 01:57:22.280]  So I'm going to give you my email address, anything you think that would be helpful.
[01:57:22.280 --> 01:57:27.280]  Just send it to me so I could be like a template, so I can read and review it.
[01:57:27.280 --> 01:57:35.280]  Send me an email to randy at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:57:35.280 --> 01:57:38.280]  I'm sorry, I didn't hear you, Randy.
[01:57:38.280 --> 01:57:46.280]  Send me an email to randy at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:57:46.280 --> 01:57:48.280]  Okay.
[01:57:48.280 --> 01:57:50.280]  And then I'm going to ask you for a timeline.
[01:57:50.280 --> 01:57:52.280]  But I'll do that off the air.
[01:57:52.280 --> 01:57:54.280]  Okay.
[01:57:54.280 --> 01:57:57.280]  Okay, thank you, Terry.
[01:57:57.280 --> 01:58:02.280]  Bill, first time and you beat him?
[01:58:02.280 --> 01:58:06.280]  Yeah, first time.
[01:58:06.280 --> 01:58:11.280]  Not bad for an old Texas redneck.
[01:58:11.280 --> 01:58:17.280]  Yeah, I wanted to say, yeah, thanks for, you know, it helped a lot.
[01:58:17.280 --> 01:58:21.280]  Listen to y'all and Eddie Craig traffic seminars.
[01:58:21.280 --> 01:58:22.280]  That was a great help.
[01:58:22.280 --> 01:58:23.280]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:58:23.280 --> 01:58:26.280]  Eddie who?
[01:58:26.280 --> 01:58:28.280]  Just kidding.
[01:58:28.280 --> 01:58:33.280]  Anyway, anyway, that was a lot of help.
[01:58:33.280 --> 01:58:37.280]  And my friend Adam too, he helped a lot.
[01:58:37.280 --> 01:58:43.280]  He said the other day, you're my only friend who cares about him.
[01:58:43.280 --> 01:58:45.280]  He has this stuff.
[01:58:45.280 --> 01:58:50.280]  It's fun getting together and talking about it.
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:54.280]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[01:58:54.280 --> 01:58:58.280]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.280 --> 01:59:02.280]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:02.280 --> 01:59:07.280]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:59:07.280 --> 01:59:09.280]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:09.280 --> 01:59:13.280]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.280 --> 01:59:18.280]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.280 --> 01:59:22.280]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:22.280 --> 01:59:28.280]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.280 --> 01:59:33.280]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.280 --> 01:59:39.280]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free
[01:59:39.280 --> 01:59:48.280]  at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.280 --> 01:59:51.280]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.280 --> 01:59:54.280]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:59:54.280 --> 02:00:22.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com