ROL_2019-10-31_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following newsflash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429.00 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.440]  Silver $16.45 an ounce, Copper $2.75 an ounce, Oil, Texas Crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent Crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.840]  $62.47 a barrel, and Cryptos in order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $250.00
[00:29.840 --> 00:41.440]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:45.840 --> 00:52.400]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:57.360]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[00:57.360 --> 01:00.240]  killing 10 and entering 40 today in history.
[01:04.400 --> 01:09.440]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing hemp into
[01:09.440 --> 01:14.080]  Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin,
[01:14.080 --> 01:18.000]  and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:18.000 --> 01:22.640]  new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment
[01:22.640 --> 01:27.760]  to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier
[01:27.760 --> 01:32.400]  this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:32.400 --> 01:37.040]  because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated
[01:37.040 --> 01:42.080]  in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.080 --> 01:48.000]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works,
[01:48.000 --> 01:54.400]  as well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Caima Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.400 --> 01:59.600]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution
[01:59.600 --> 02:05.040]  of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball,
[02:05.040 --> 02:08.640]  an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote,
[02:08.640 --> 02:13.200]  the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.200 --> 02:17.760]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged
[02:17.760 --> 02:27.360]  with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark. As
[02:27.360 --> 02:32.960]  the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever
[02:32.960 --> 02:39.040]  captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.040 --> 02:44.160]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its
[02:44.160 --> 02:50.320]  front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[03:14.320 --> 03:16.000]  There is some broken, but you
[03:20.400 --> 03:22.800]  I'm just gonna do what you're gonna do.
[03:27.040 --> 03:32.560]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you're gonna do? What you're gonna do when they come for you?
[03:32.560 --> 03:38.240]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you're gonna do? What you're gonna do when they come for you?
[03:38.240 --> 03:43.760]  When you were eight and you had that trace, you go to school and learn to go, then lose.
[03:43.760 --> 03:49.120]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool if you get hot and you must get cool?
[03:49.120 --> 03:54.560]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, or what you gonna do when they come for you?
[03:54.560 --> 04:00.240]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, or what you gonna do when they come for you?
[04:00.240 --> 04:06.160]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one, you chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father.
[04:06.160 --> 04:17.040]  Okay, this is Randy Colton, Brett Fountains, Edward Stevens on this Thursday. What day is this, Brett?
[04:20.240 --> 04:23.920]  No, we are 31st of October, 2019.
[04:23.920 --> 04:25.920]  Halloweeny!
[04:28.480 --> 04:35.600]  Anyway, we've had no trick-or-treaters out here. I'm kind of on the edge of town, but I expect you're one or two. We'll get to zero.
[04:35.600 --> 04:39.760]  I guess Halloween is losing some of its glitter.
[04:42.880 --> 04:47.360]  Anyway, I have a trick-or-treat for the SEC.
[04:49.120 --> 04:59.840]  I'm putting together a plan. I have been looking at a couple of executive orders that Trump put out.
[04:59.840 --> 05:08.640]  Now, we didn't hear anything about this on the news. Just, oh, they put out an executive order. They didn't tell him what it was.
[05:08.640 --> 05:19.840]  And I'm reading these things, and holy crap, we have a president that's actually straightening some things out.
[05:19.840 --> 05:37.840]  Let's see if I've got the second one up. There it is. I've got two of them. The second one, the first one is promoting the rule of law through improved agency guidance documents.
[05:37.840 --> 05:50.880]  This one had to have been written for the singular purpose of sticking it up the SEC's behinds and breaking it off at them.
[05:50.880 --> 06:19.920]  Big problem with the SEC. The SEC Debra sent me a letter from signed by 15 congressmen addressed to the SEC, warning them to stop defining the codes, or in what's the term, not defining the intent of the policy.
[06:19.920 --> 06:33.920]  No, I didn't want to say enforcement. I wanted to see a policy defining policy by enforcement. That's what Debra Pike can't engage with.
[06:33.920 --> 06:45.920]  So they were warned them to stop defining policy by enforcement. If they couldn't define policy, then the legislature would do it for them.
[06:45.920 --> 06:59.920]  Apparently, the SEC was not impressed. They ignored the legislators. Well, let's see if they ignore the president and his executive order.
[06:59.920 --> 07:15.920]  His executive order told them that is precisely what they must do. Then they have to, it sets all kinds of restrictions on them. I was reading through this thing, and it is really well done.
[07:15.920 --> 07:35.920]  The agency's policy, departments and agencies in the executive branch adopt regulations that impose legally binding requirements on the public, even though in our constitutional democracy only congress is vested with the legislative power.
[07:35.920 --> 07:58.920]  The Administrative Procedures Act generally requires agencies in exercising that solemn responsibility to engage in notice and comment rulemaking to provide public notice of proposed regulations under Section 553 of Title V, which is Administrative Procedures Act, United States Code.
[07:58.920 --> 08:15.920]  Allow interested parties an opportunity to comment, consider and respond to significant comments, and publish final regulations in the Federal Register.
[08:15.920 --> 08:31.920]  Agencies may clarify existing obligations through non-binding guidance documents, which the APA exempts from notice and commit comment requirements.
[08:31.920 --> 08:51.920]  I think it's a little small for my old guy to read. Even when accompanied by a disclaimer that it is non-binding, a guidance document issued by an agency may carry the implicit threat of enforcement action if the regulated public does not comply.
[08:51.920 --> 09:11.920]  Moreover, the public frequently has insufficient notice of guidance documents, which are not always published in the Federal Register or distributed to all regulated agencies, that is pointed directly at the SEC.
[09:11.920 --> 09:27.920]  And he goes on to order the SEC to give notice of policy. What the SEC has been doing is using the Code of Federal Regulation as expo facto laws.
[09:27.920 --> 09:49.920]  They have been defining policy by the enforcement that they do. They say, you did this thing last year, last month, last week, and today we're saying that's improper and that's illegal and we're punishing you for doing it last year, last month, last week.
[09:49.920 --> 10:05.920]  That is the definition of expo facto laws and it is absolutely unconstitutional as people are being punished for actions that at the time were not construed as wrongful actions.
[10:05.920 --> 10:25.920]  So we got a plan and the plan is we're going to set them up. I'm going to investors. Investors, you know, we tend to think that the people with a lot of money, they control things.
[10:25.920 --> 10:39.920]  Well, people with mega money control things. The people with simply a lot of money have been screwed by the SEC regularly.
[10:39.920 --> 10:50.920]  And I went to a convention in Chicago and one of the main speakers was the owner of a lending institution.
[10:50.920 --> 11:01.920]  And he was complaining about this because they had set up a plan for a blockchain type of financing program.
[11:01.920 --> 11:09.920]  They filed a request for an opinion from the SEC and the SEC ignored it.
[11:09.920 --> 11:19.920]  They launched their program because they didn't get any negative feedback from the SEC and a month after they launched their programs, the SEC come in and shut them down.
[11:19.920 --> 11:28.920]  So the SEC set back and waited until this company committed itself. Then they come in and shut them down.
[11:28.920 --> 11:37.920]  So now they make a claim against them and say, you can fight us and we'll keep you shut down for the next five years.
[11:37.920 --> 11:46.920]  And all the money that you've already collected, you'll have to give back and all of the money you've put into this program will go down the toilet.
[11:46.920 --> 11:56.920]  Or you can make us a deal, pay us a whole bunch of fines and we'll let this go away.
[11:56.920 --> 12:01.920]  I'm looking through the enforcement by the SEC.
[12:01.920 --> 12:15.920]  If you go to their side, they have an enforcement section and you can look at all of the enforcement actions they have filed and where they went before the SEC court.
[12:15.920 --> 12:25.920]  I defy you to find a single one where the SEC court ruled against the SEC.
[12:25.920 --> 12:34.920]  I went all the way back to 2011, not a single one.
[12:34.920 --> 12:45.920]  Everybody made a deal and accepted liability of some kind and paid off the SEC.
[12:45.920 --> 12:50.920]  This is the biggest scam in American government.
[12:50.920 --> 12:56.920]  The SEC is the more money you've got, the more they screw you for.
[12:56.920 --> 13:05.920]  And I had someone call me to help someone who had an insurance company or a company where he bought insurance policies.
[13:05.920 --> 13:12.920]  And it interfered with the big insurance conglomerates and they sick the SEC on them.
[13:12.920 --> 13:18.920]  The SEC come and took this guy's life work.
[13:18.920 --> 13:20.920]  They stole it from him.
[13:20.920 --> 13:30.920]  Even after the state of Texas had sued him and he took them on in court and got a ruling that what he was doing was not selling securities.
[13:30.920 --> 13:34.920]  He's going out and buying insurance policies.
[13:34.920 --> 13:36.920]  People get older.
[13:36.920 --> 13:46.920]  They buy insurance policies and as they get older, their income decreases and their need for life insurance decreases with it.
[13:46.920 --> 13:50.920]  The kids grow up, they're out taking care of themselves.
[13:50.920 --> 13:59.920]  The first thing they tend to drop off is the life insurance after they've paid into it for most of their life.
[13:59.920 --> 14:08.920]  So this guy come in and said, well, I'll buy that policy from you and I will make the payments on it and I'll pay you so much a month.
[14:08.920 --> 14:12.920]  And then if you pass away, then I collect the premium.
[14:12.920 --> 14:29.920]  Well, what this did to the insurance companies is it really screwed up their calculations because instead of having the vast majority of these insurance policies dropped when people got to the point where they would be right at the point of being able to use it,
[14:29.920 --> 14:32.920]  then they ran out of money just for it and dropped it.
[14:32.920 --> 14:39.920]  So this guy spot them and he paid these people extra money, paid them part back of what they had built up in it.
[14:39.920 --> 14:42.920]  Well, the insurance companies went to the SEC.
[14:42.920 --> 14:44.920]  The state came after them.
[14:44.920 --> 14:48.920]  Courts in the state ruled that what he was doing was not a security.
[14:48.920 --> 14:52.920]  The SEC didn't come after them.
[14:52.920 --> 14:53.920]  They came to me.
[14:53.920 --> 14:56.920]  I looked it over and I told them you need to file a challenge.
[14:56.920 --> 14:57.920]  Subject matter jurisdiction.
[14:57.920 --> 15:00.920]  This is res judicata.
[15:00.920 --> 15:03.920]  There were three guys involved.
[15:03.920 --> 15:11.920]  One was in Arizona, one was in California, both of them filed a subject matter jurisdiction challenge.
[15:11.920 --> 15:15.920]  The SEC immediately dropped all claims against both of them.
[15:15.920 --> 15:23.920]  I sat down in front of this guy's lawyer and told him this lawyer you got here is screwing you.
[15:23.920 --> 15:31.920]  He's going to extract all the money he can from you and then he's going to throw you're behind under the SEC's bus.
[15:31.920 --> 15:37.920]  The lawyer started up out of his chair like he was going to take a poke at me.
[15:37.920 --> 15:42.920]  And I looked over at him with a look that said, go ahead, Bubba, you try that out.
[15:42.920 --> 15:45.920]  And he decided to sit back down.
[15:45.920 --> 15:50.920]  And that is exactly what the lawyer did to him.
[15:50.920 --> 15:53.920]  It took his whole life.
[15:53.920 --> 15:58.920]  And a couple years later, I was talking to the SEC about something else.
[15:58.920 --> 16:00.920]  I was trying to get information from him.
[16:00.920 --> 16:03.920]  And they were assuring me about what they do and how they do it.
[16:03.920 --> 16:05.920]  And I said, don't give me that crap.
[16:05.920 --> 16:07.920]  You guys are for sale.
[16:07.920 --> 16:11.920]  The insurance companies paid you to screw this guy in Waco.
[16:11.920 --> 16:15.920]  And the guy I was talking to knew exactly what I was talking about.
[16:15.920 --> 16:19.920]  And he got real subdued because he knew.
[16:19.920 --> 16:21.920]  He knew I was right.
[16:21.920 --> 16:25.920]  He knew that I knew they are scoundrels.
[16:25.920 --> 16:28.920]  The SEC is for sale to the highest bidder.
[16:28.920 --> 16:30.920]  They always have been.
[16:30.920 --> 16:35.920]  And they've been doing this to Trump all his professional career.
[16:35.920 --> 16:38.920]  That's payback time.
[16:38.920 --> 16:43.920]  Trump has paid them back in spades.
[16:43.920 --> 16:47.920]  So I'm preparing a lawsuit against them.
[16:47.920 --> 16:52.920]  I'm going to take this SEC comply tool
[16:52.920 --> 16:59.920]  and put together a utility token sale.
[16:59.920 --> 17:08.920]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway.
[17:08.920 --> 17:10.920]  Sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[17:10.920 --> 17:14.920]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:14.920 --> 17:16.920]  Any amount is appreciated.
[17:16.920 --> 17:18.920]  Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[17:18.920 --> 17:23.920]  LogosGunWorks, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR 15.
[17:23.920 --> 17:26.920]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:26.920 --> 17:29.920]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:29.920 --> 17:34.920]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:34.920 --> 17:38.920]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:38.920 --> 17:42.920]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser
[17:42.920 --> 17:47.920]  so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[17:47.920 --> 17:50.920]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:50.920 --> 17:54.920]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:54.920 --> 17:59.920]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[17:59.920 --> 18:04.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:04.920 --> 18:08.920]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:08.920 --> 18:12.920]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors
[18:12.920 --> 18:14.920]  and now you can win too.
[18:14.920 --> 18:18.920]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[18:18.920 --> 18:20.920]  using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.920 --> 18:24.920]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons.
[18:24.920 --> 18:26.920]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.920 --> 18:28.920]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:28.920 --> 18:33.920]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.920 --> 18:38.920]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.920 --> 18:40.920]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.920 --> 18:44.920]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.920 --> 18:49.920]  and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.920 --> 18:57.920]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.920 --> 19:22.920]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:22.920 --> 19:51.920]  Okay, I survived that dive off the cliff there, but just barely.
[19:51.920 --> 19:54.920]  Okay, we're talking about setting up the SEC.
[19:54.920 --> 19:58.920]  So I'm going to put together this token sale.
[19:58.920 --> 20:01.920]  I don't really care if I sell any tokens or not.
[20:01.920 --> 20:08.920]  I don't have any tokens sold, so I'm not engaged in securities in any way.
[20:08.920 --> 20:15.920]  So I'm going to make up this sale, and we're going to sell a utility token.
[20:15.920 --> 20:19.920]  And this token will buy our services.
[20:19.920 --> 20:28.920]  And the value of this token will be fixed to the value of the spot price of silver.
[20:28.920 --> 20:36.920]  And when we do this token sale, and anyone who purchases these tokens
[20:36.920 --> 20:43.920]  can turn them into us for services once we get this project up and working.
[20:43.920 --> 20:46.920]  So that makes it a commodity.
[20:46.920 --> 20:51.920]  And no matter what happens, you know, if people buy these things
[20:51.920 --> 20:55.920]  and decide they like them and they're valuable and they trade them back and forth,
[20:55.920 --> 20:57.920]  we're not going to care.
[20:57.920 --> 21:04.920]  But when it comes time to redeem them, we will redeem them at the spot price of silver.
[21:04.920 --> 21:06.920]  We don't care what they paid for.
[21:06.920 --> 21:12.920]  So it will be of no great advantage for them to trade in these things.
[21:12.920 --> 21:15.920]  So it makes it a utility token.
[21:15.920 --> 21:21.920]  However, if we do launch this project, then you can trade in the utility token
[21:21.920 --> 21:26.920]  for a security token at par value.
[21:26.920 --> 21:30.920]  And that's a, what do they call that, Deborah?
[21:30.920 --> 21:32.920]  That's a security swap.
[21:32.920 --> 21:37.920]  The security swap is not governed by the SEC.
[21:37.920 --> 21:39.920]  So they've been claiming that if you do that,
[21:39.920 --> 21:42.920]  then what you were selling was a security in the first place.
[21:42.920 --> 21:44.920]  And that's what I want them to do.
[21:44.920 --> 21:46.920]  So I will make up this.
[21:46.920 --> 21:52.920]  We'll use our question here and build our checklist and make sure we got everything in place.
[21:52.920 --> 22:01.920]  Then we will produce an application and a letter for,
[22:01.920 --> 22:05.920]  I'm sorry, we won't produce an application because we're not applying.
[22:05.920 --> 22:07.920]  That's for other guys when they do it later.
[22:07.920 --> 22:16.920]  We will produce a affidavit of due diligence compliance and a request for an opinion,
[22:16.920 --> 22:22.920]  which includes a request for clarification of a whole bunch of terms
[22:22.920 --> 22:29.920]  that we have found in the code in the process of doing these questionnaires
[22:29.920 --> 22:34.920]  that are terms of art which are not adequately defined in the code.
[22:34.920 --> 22:38.920]  So I'm going to ask you to define all those terms of art.
[22:38.920 --> 22:39.920]  Now, wait a minute, Randy.
[22:39.920 --> 22:44.920]  Are you saying that you specifically are highlighting all the many terms
[22:44.920 --> 22:48.920]  that they didn't adequately define?
[22:48.920 --> 22:49.920]  Yeah.
[22:49.920 --> 22:51.920]  I got one paragraph.
[22:51.920 --> 22:53.920]  Isn't that kind of mean?
[22:53.920 --> 22:55.920]  Oh, it gets worse than that.
[22:55.920 --> 23:02.920]  I got this chapter, sub-chapter section, paragraph, sub-paragraph, sentence,
[23:02.920 --> 23:04.920]  sentence fragment.
[23:04.920 --> 23:09.920]  In this part of this sentence, the term this is used,
[23:09.920 --> 23:17.920]  but it's unclear what this as a pronoun refers to, please define.
[23:17.920 --> 23:20.920]  I got a lot of those.
[23:20.920 --> 23:25.920]  This is the most crappy written code I have ever seen.
[23:25.920 --> 23:27.920]  I got hundreds of them.
[23:27.920 --> 23:30.920]  And I've been sending them to the SEC.
[23:30.920 --> 23:36.920]  And they sent me this letter back saying that they were not going to provide me with definitions.
[23:36.920 --> 23:39.920]  So I sent them an email back saying, well, that's okay.
[23:39.920 --> 23:44.920]  I won't get offended if you don't give me responses.
[23:44.920 --> 23:48.920]  If you don't get offended because I keep sending them,
[23:48.920 --> 23:54.920]  as I intend to sue you in the district court for a petition declaratory judgment,
[23:54.920 --> 23:57.920]  and we'll get the judge to define them for you.
[23:57.920 --> 24:03.920]  Now they just, I'm sure it was intended that they take that as just a smart mouth threat.
[24:03.920 --> 24:06.920]  But it was no such thing.
[24:06.920 --> 24:09.920]  It was notice and opportunity.
[24:09.920 --> 24:12.920]  That was their tort letter.
[24:12.920 --> 24:20.920]  So I'm going to put together a funding sale, like a go funding sale, or donations.
[24:20.920 --> 24:28.920]  We're going to ask investors, accredited investors for donations,
[24:28.920 --> 24:33.920]  investors, issuers, and brokers,
[24:33.920 --> 24:47.920]  for donations to help us set up the SEC so we can sue them to force them to comply with Trump's two executive orders.
[24:47.920 --> 24:53.920]  They come up on the dime. What I'm telling these guys is they're terrified of them.
[24:53.920 --> 24:58.920]  When I talk to the head of this lending company,
[24:58.920 --> 25:02.920]  I say, why don't you guys file a petition to declaratory judgment?
[25:02.920 --> 25:06.920]  If the SEC won't give you an answer, the petition is in the district court for declaratory adjustment.
[25:06.920 --> 25:08.920]  Oh, I can't do that.
[25:08.920 --> 25:14.920]  Oh, well, if I do that, the next week they'll be auditing every book I've got.
[25:14.920 --> 25:19.920]  I said, no, they won't. That would be retaliation.
[25:19.920 --> 25:22.920]  But he was terrified that they would.
[25:22.920 --> 25:30.920]  And all of them are that way because he said, I've got obligations to my shareholders and to my investors.
[25:30.920 --> 25:34.920]  So I can't take this risk. And that's what they're all saying.
[25:34.920 --> 25:43.920]  The SEC has been enforcing expo facto laws that they could come in and just zap you with anything you they want to.
[25:43.920 --> 25:47.920]  Doesn't have to be valid. They shut you down for five years.
[25:47.920 --> 25:50.920]  Or you just do whatever they tell you.
[25:50.920 --> 25:52.920]  So I pick a fight with them.
[25:52.920 --> 25:57.920]  And in my letter, I tell them the best five tabs of one you picked.
[25:57.920 --> 26:03.920]  So I'm setting this sale up telling them I'm going to have it and asking them for an opinion.
[26:03.920 --> 26:05.920]  They're not going to give me one.
[26:05.920 --> 26:12.920]  And when they don't, I'm going to sue them in the district court under a petition for declaratory judgment.
[26:12.920 --> 26:16.920]  So there is no option for rule 12.
[26:16.920 --> 26:24.920]  Rule 12 be six motion to dismiss for failure state of claim because the declaratory adjustments who does not have a claim.
[26:24.920 --> 26:32.920]  So they can't appeal to the district court to exercise its discretion and throw our court case out out of hand.
[26:32.920 --> 26:34.920]  They get stuck.
[26:34.920 --> 26:42.920]  And then we go to discovery and the first thing I do is ask the court to order arbitration.
[26:42.920 --> 26:48.920]  And in the meantime, I bar grieve them every time they squeak.
[26:48.920 --> 26:58.920]  I'm just a condo complaint to judge at every opportunity just thoroughly make a nuisance of myself.
[26:58.920 --> 27:04.920]  And then we would get to arbitration and bring an attorney to sit down with them and play.
[27:04.920 --> 27:06.920]  Let's make a deal.
[27:06.920 --> 27:19.920]  And the deal is you abide by the requirements of these two executive orders issued by Trump.
[27:19.920 --> 27:21.920]  And we're out of here.
[27:21.920 --> 27:28.920]  We'll all go home and that will absolutely hamstring these guys.
[27:28.920 --> 27:34.920]  It will neuter the SEC won't stop them from doing their job.
[27:34.920 --> 27:40.920]  It won't stop them from going after legitimately fraudulent issuers.
[27:40.920 --> 27:47.920]  But it will stop them from ex from exercising their authority in an expo facto manner.
[27:47.920 --> 27:52.920]  I think I can get these guys to invest in this. At least that's what I'm hoping.
[27:52.920 --> 27:55.920]  We're going to have ourselves a fight.
[27:55.920 --> 28:00.920]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[28:00.920 --> 28:04.920]  You saw the document. Brett, what do you think?
[28:04.920 --> 28:10.920]  I think you're on the right track. This is headed towards making some real change.
[28:10.920 --> 28:20.920]  I can only imagine what these people are thinking when they realize their golden goose has got a sword to its throat.
[28:20.920 --> 28:23.920]  He had a pistol to his head.
[28:23.920 --> 28:25.920]  Right.
[28:25.920 --> 28:29.920]  Probably have some turnovers.
[28:29.920 --> 28:38.920]  For those of you who haven't heard it, Brett has a tape of a friend of his who had been instructed by Brett.
[28:38.920 --> 28:41.920]  He's talking to his attorney.
[28:41.920 --> 28:44.920]  And the attorney is afraid he's going to barge with him.
[28:44.920 --> 28:49.920]  The guy's voice is about two or three octaves higher than it should be.
[28:49.920 --> 28:57.920]  And he's telling him that he can't work when he's got a dagger to his throat and a gun to his head.
[28:57.920 --> 29:02.920]  And that's just because the guy might folly grievance against him.
[29:02.920 --> 29:10.920]  And he's saying, what? And then what? If I don't put a paperclip in the right place, you're going to grieve me?
[29:10.920 --> 29:12.920]  Yeah, probably.
[29:12.920 --> 29:19.920]  And then you go to the judge and has to be removed from the case, I'll grieve you for that.
[29:19.920 --> 29:25.920]  Because you're asking the judge to interfere with a private contract.
[29:25.920 --> 29:28.920]  So we want to do this.
[29:28.920 --> 29:32.920]  What about out of time? Okay, our call board is open.
[29:32.920 --> 29:36.920]  A call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:36.920 --> 29:39.920]  If you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[29:39.920 --> 29:42.920]  I'm going to finish up here.
[29:42.920 --> 29:44.920]  When we come back, we'll start taking calls.
[29:44.920 --> 29:47.920]  So over the break, check out our sponsors.
[29:47.920 --> 29:53.920]  And if you find value in what we do here, check out the sponsors we have.
[29:53.920 --> 30:00.920]  We have some that will help you with the tools you need to find that value. We'll rewrite that.
[30:00.920 --> 30:05.920]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:05.920 --> 30:10.920]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets.
[30:10.920 --> 30:14.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[30:14.920 --> 30:20.920]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.920 --> 30:25.920]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.920 --> 30:30.920]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.920 --> 30:33.920]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.920 --> 30:36.920]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:36.920 --> 30:40.920]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.920 --> 30:44.920]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.920 --> 30:51.920]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information.
[30:51.920 --> 30:54.920]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[30:54.920 --> 31:03.920]  It's not an idle question. According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year.
[31:03.920 --> 31:07.920]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com.
[31:07.920 --> 31:11.920]  Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:11.920 --> 31:17.920]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare.
[31:17.920 --> 31:20.920]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:20.920 --> 31:49.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:49.920 --> 32:01.920]  Thank you for watching.
[32:19.920 --> 32:24.920]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:24.920 --> 32:34.920]  Former sheriff's deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:34.920 --> 32:40.920]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.920 --> 32:47.920]  By ordering now, you will receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Line, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:47.920 --> 32:50.920]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.920 --> 32:54.920]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.920 --> 33:02.920]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.920 --> 33:13.920]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:13.920 --> 33:18.920]  Mr. Officer, you're taking the line ahead.
[33:18.920 --> 33:22.920]  I want you to follow the law of the land.
[33:22.920 --> 33:25.920]  I don't understand.
[33:25.920 --> 33:33.920]  The job is to protect our reserves, not beat our bees.
[33:33.920 --> 33:45.920]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this Thursday, the 31st day of October Halloween.
[33:45.920 --> 33:51.920]  And I was going to finish up, but there's something else I need to address quickly.
[33:51.920 --> 33:53.920]  That's not the only thing we're going to do.
[33:53.920 --> 34:02.920]  We're going to sue the SEC, but also we're going to, I'm putting together a proposal to Trump.
[34:02.920 --> 34:09.920]  I'm going to ask the Trump administration to issue another executive order.
[34:09.920 --> 34:26.920]  And in this executive order, I'm going to ask Trump to order all US attorneys to act in accordance with Article 2.03 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure under the doctrine of good faith and credit.
[34:26.920 --> 34:31.920]  The legislature of the state of Texas has addressed this issue.
[34:31.920 --> 34:37.920]  The legislature of the United States or the federal government has not addressed this issue.
[34:37.920 --> 34:57.920]  So since all the legislatures trust all the other legislators, where one legislature has considered an issue and another has not, under good faith and credit, you can bring that code into the other jurisdiction as a guiding principle.
[34:57.920 --> 35:19.920]  So we're going to ask the president to issue an executive order to executive officers, specifically US attorneys, and order them to stop intervening between private citizens and federal grand juries in the matter of criminal complaints against public officials.
[35:19.920 --> 35:28.920]  And in that case, they are to stand down and not interfere.
[35:28.920 --> 35:31.920]  Well, then how are they going to shield each other from prosecution, Randy?
[35:31.920 --> 35:33.920]  Exactly.
[35:33.920 --> 35:36.920]  Right now, Trump's elected.
[35:36.920 --> 35:42.920]  When he was elected, every US attorney in the country had to tender their resignation.
[35:42.920 --> 35:46.920]  He has everybody's resignation.
[35:46.920 --> 35:50.920]  I talked to Ted Scarlett in California about this.
[35:50.920 --> 35:53.920]  I'm going to get a presentation from him.
[35:53.920 --> 35:56.920]  I've got Don Terry in Alabama.
[35:56.920 --> 35:58.920]  I'll get one from him.
[35:58.920 --> 36:09.920]  We'll get several others to show how these public officials are acting in total disregard of law, but they're being shielded by prosecuting attorneys.
[36:09.920 --> 36:17.920]  And we'll ask the president to stop them from doing that only in the case of complaints against public officials.
[36:17.920 --> 36:28.920]  It is inappropriate that a US attorney should be put in a position to make a determination as to whether or not to prosecute somebody works with.
[36:28.920 --> 36:35.920]  State of Texas considered that issue and determined that it was inappropriate.
[36:35.920 --> 36:42.920]  So in the case of a complaint against a public official, it is to go directly to the grand jury.
[36:42.920 --> 36:46.920]  The prosecuting attorney has no discretion.
[36:46.920 --> 36:56.920]  Now, there's nothing in the code that would prevent the prosecuting attorney from going before the grand jury and arguing against resentment.
[36:56.920 --> 37:02.920]  But he could not shield criminal complaints from the grand jury.
[37:02.920 --> 37:04.920]  That's what we're going to ask him for.
[37:04.920 --> 37:06.920]  I think we'd make a good case for that.
[37:06.920 --> 37:26.920]  And in Trump's current position, he would be able to remove a bunch of Democratic US attorneys and replace them with Republican appointees and have plausible deniability in the process.
[37:26.920 --> 37:28.920]  What do you think, Brett?
[37:28.920 --> 37:43.920]  I think that sounds great and considering that an executive order is that's perfectly within scope because he would be the target, if you will, for the executive order is at that level.
[37:43.920 --> 37:44.920]  It's those executives.
[37:44.920 --> 37:49.920]  All prosecutors are part of the executive branch.
[37:49.920 --> 37:54.920]  They work right under him, just like the FBI.
[37:54.920 --> 37:59.920]  They all work for the president directly. They're all political.
[37:59.920 --> 38:10.920]  And this is exactly the kind of thing that has, on its surface, it looks nonpartisan.
[38:10.920 --> 38:28.920]  And it's the kind of thing, what he says to us, the citizens in this republic is that we will not allow our appointed officials to disenfranchise you.
[38:28.920 --> 38:37.920]  If you have knowledge that a felony has been committed and you don't report that knowledge under the Fed, 18 U.S. Code 4.
[38:37.920 --> 38:44.920]  I mean, it's not 18 U.S. Code 2932 or something way back there in the back, 4 right up there at the front.
[38:44.920 --> 38:47.920]  It's a misprison of felony.
[38:47.920 --> 38:57.920]  So even if the allegation is not a felony, if it's a crime not to report a felony, it's certainly your obligation to report any other crime.
[38:57.920 --> 39:13.920]  And to have a appointed official, not an elected official, disenfranchise you from your right to seek equal protection of the laws is unconscionable.
[39:13.920 --> 39:20.920]  It should be something easy to argue for.
[39:20.920 --> 39:23.920]  Okay, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[39:23.920 --> 39:26.920]  I would like some input or comment on that.
[39:26.920 --> 39:29.920]  If anybody has an opinion on it, let me know.
[39:29.920 --> 39:42.920]  If anybody has any really horrendous stories of prosecutors interfering and we got a bunch of them out of Texas where we've been going straight to grand juries and prosecutors have been interfering.
[39:42.920 --> 39:43.920]  Let us know.
[39:43.920 --> 39:49.920]  We want to build up a stack of these stories to see if we can make this sell to the Trump administration.
[39:49.920 --> 39:50.920]  Okay.
[39:50.920 --> 39:52.920]  From a lot of different states.
[39:52.920 --> 39:53.920]  Yes.
[39:53.920 --> 39:56.920]  More states we can get the better.
[39:56.920 --> 40:04.920]  And this whole foreclosure issue is a great issue because we can show where the federal courts have absolutely been bought and paid for.
[40:04.920 --> 40:10.920]  And it's nothing we can do because US attorneys protect the judges.
[40:10.920 --> 40:16.920]  And our president happens to not be happy with federal judges.
[40:16.920 --> 40:26.920]  Maybe his way to pay them back for what he considers to be wrongs committed against him.
[40:26.920 --> 40:29.920]  Okay, we're going to go to our call.
[40:29.920 --> 40:32.920]  Do you have something, Brett?
[40:32.920 --> 40:34.920]  No, nothing in particular.
[40:34.920 --> 40:37.920]  Okay, then we're going to go to Tina in California.
[40:37.920 --> 40:39.920]  Hello, Tina.
[40:39.920 --> 40:40.920]  Where have you been?
[40:40.920 --> 40:42.920]  It's been a while.
[40:42.920 --> 40:57.920]  I know we were out of town last week going to LA where the tick fire was and I couldn't get online to talk to you because we were other people's houses.
[40:57.920 --> 41:04.920]  Anyway, and we just today had a fire about half a mile from our house.
[41:04.920 --> 41:13.920]  I just, my brother lives in Long Beach and I called him and asked him if we could all come out and cook wheezes in his front yard.
[41:13.920 --> 41:16.920]  Oh, that was pretty mean.
[41:16.920 --> 41:20.920]  He did not find that as funny as I did.
[41:20.920 --> 41:23.920]  No.
[41:23.920 --> 41:25.920]  Yeah, it's getting pretty bad out here.
[41:25.920 --> 41:29.920]  Luckily where we are, we're in a better area.
[41:29.920 --> 41:39.920]  Anyway, I was listening to what you said there about having stories and there's a couple of things I want to bring up.
[41:39.920 --> 41:47.920]  You know, let's start with the SEC, the FDIC and the administration.
[41:47.920 --> 42:04.920]  You know, I get what you're saying, but I think Mnuchin, who is his Treasury Secretary and who was the CEO of one West Bank who was named the Foreclosure King, has buddies in the SEC.
[42:04.920 --> 42:15.920]  And he's just, him and his friend Joseph Austin have just completely decimated the CFPB, which is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
[42:15.920 --> 42:20.920]  So nobody, anybody who files against them there gets nowhere.
[42:20.920 --> 42:31.920]  So how do you get around that where they're changing the rules literally to suit the banks and to make it easier for the banks to not get sued?
[42:31.920 --> 42:39.920]  The one primary source spot for Trump is the SEC.
[42:39.920 --> 42:45.920]  You know, he's in cahoots with the banks, but he's not in cahoots with the SEC.
[42:45.920 --> 42:59.920]  They have been a thorn in his side and if you read these executive orders, clearly they were written to neuter the SEC.
[42:59.920 --> 43:09.920]  The problem with the CFPB, they have really been making inroads.
[43:09.920 --> 43:16.920]  And when Trump, when he came in, he was after them specifically.
[43:16.920 --> 43:23.920]  That is a good point, how to straddle that line between these two agencies.
[43:23.920 --> 43:26.920]  Hang on, we're about to go to break.
[43:26.920 --> 43:32.920]  We still have our fundraiser going, so over the break, check out our sponsors.
[43:32.920 --> 43:41.920]  You know, we have your dictionary and Eddie's traffic course and my legal 101.
[43:41.920 --> 43:48.920]  These are tools that will help you achieve the remedies we talk about on this show.
[43:48.920 --> 43:54.920]  And they'll give you the background you need to be able to take these guys on.
[43:54.920 --> 43:59.920]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[43:59.920 --> 44:04.920]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[44:04.920 --> 44:08.920]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[44:08.920 --> 44:12.920]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[44:12.920 --> 44:19.920]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[44:19.920 --> 44:21.920]  How can I help logos?
[44:21.920 --> 44:28.920]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[44:28.920 --> 44:33.920]  First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[44:33.920 --> 44:36.920]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:36.920 --> 44:42.920]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[44:42.920 --> 44:43.920]  Do I pay extra?
[44:43.920 --> 44:44.920]  No.
[44:44.920 --> 44:46.920]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:46.920 --> 44:47.920]  No.
[44:47.920 --> 44:48.920]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[44:48.920 --> 44:49.920]  No.
[44:49.920 --> 44:50.920]  I mean, yes.
[44:50.920 --> 44:56.920]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[44:56.920 --> 44:57.920]  We are Logos.
[44:57.920 --> 45:26.920]  Happy Holidays, Logos!
[45:27.920 --> 45:33.920]  Our jurisdiction area was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:33.920 --> 45:42.920]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:42.920 --> 45:51.920]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:51.920 --> 46:00.920]  Please visit LulavLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:21.920 --> 46:50.920]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton.
[46:50.920 --> 46:58.920]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Lulav Radio, and we're talking to Tina in California and you asked a really good question.
[46:58.920 --> 47:08.920]  That definitely will require some political song and dance and seltzer down your pants.
[47:08.920 --> 47:10.920]  Yes.
[47:10.920 --> 47:21.920]  But his executive order will affect the CFPB the same way that it affects the SEC.
[47:21.920 --> 47:25.920]  So why would he do that?
[47:25.920 --> 47:31.920]  I don't know because they're blocking every complaint pretty much against the bank.
[47:31.920 --> 47:36.920]  They just send it on to the banks and then they say it's fixed.
[47:36.920 --> 47:42.920]  The CFPB is relatively new, unlike the SEC.
[47:42.920 --> 48:05.920]  So their regulations are have a lot less case law supporting them and have a lot less direction already put out there where the SEC said years and years and years to get a more stable defined system.
[48:05.920 --> 48:19.920]  It would seem like in reading these executive orders that this would likely be more onerous to the CFPB than it is for the SEC.
[48:19.920 --> 48:24.920]  And I'm using all these letter agency numbers to confuse everybody.
[48:24.920 --> 48:26.920]  What is CFPB?
[48:26.920 --> 48:30.920]  The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
[48:30.920 --> 48:43.920]  And when that first came in, they were really aggressive and then as soon as Trump got in, he fired the director and replaced him with Puppet.
[48:43.920 --> 48:44.920]  Yep.
[48:44.920 --> 48:53.920]  So why would he, you know, he just issued these orders in October, just 20 days ago.
[48:53.920 --> 48:55.920]  So they're brand new.
[48:55.920 --> 49:07.920]  Where's going on? Yeah. And then, you know, you were talking about having stories about, you know, you know, I wrote to the, oh gosh, what do you call them?
[49:07.920 --> 49:16.920]  The prosecutor in LA and about the fact that, you know, nobody was doing this.
[49:16.920 --> 49:25.920]  The state bar wasn't doing anything about the attorneys who were violating the law in these foreclosures and they said nobody cares.
[49:25.920 --> 49:27.920]  You know, it's like pressing in the wind.
[49:27.920 --> 49:30.920]  So I, and I'd written for me a year before and didn't get a response.
[49:30.920 --> 49:34.920]  So then I wondered why, but what you're saying now is making sense.
[49:34.920 --> 49:36.920]  They just ignore everything you send.
[49:36.920 --> 49:49.920]  And now I'm being more aggressive and it was still getting stonewalled and then in Texas with the notary issue, I filed complaints every which way right up to one of the highest people in the state.
[49:49.920 --> 49:51.920]  And they said, oh, we can't do anything.
[49:51.920 --> 49:53.920]  Well, I haven't.
[49:53.920 --> 49:56.920]  Did you file with the secretary of state?
[49:56.920 --> 49:58.920]  Yes.
[49:58.920 --> 49:59.920]  Hmm.
[49:59.920 --> 50:05.920]  Because they generally don't notaries are quasi public officials.
[50:05.920 --> 50:10.920]  So the secretary of state is not bashful at all about landing on them like a ton of bricks.
[50:10.920 --> 50:18.920]  But this is a notary issue that's in favor of the banks and they've been bought and paid for by the banks.
[50:18.920 --> 50:27.920]  So this may be an issue where we need to hammer the secretary of state.
[50:27.920 --> 50:37.920]  So I'll send you the letters that I sent and their responses so you can tell me how to get next, but going on your issue and you wanted stories and you want to go after them.
[50:37.920 --> 50:47.920]  If it's going against the banks, particularly one that his secretary of his treasury secretary ran and it still holds.
[50:47.920 --> 51:01.920]  I think 50 million shares in sick group, which is a conflict of interest for his position. And I think it's done in Bradstreet is saying he still owns all these shares.
[51:01.920 --> 51:14.920]  How is that going to affect it when you're trying to go against the people who worked for the bank that he ran as a foreclosure machine.
[51:14.920 --> 51:22.920]  Well, there are other issues that we can focus on.
[51:22.920 --> 51:27.920]  We don't have to focus on the banks. The banks will come up, but we let them bring that up.
[51:27.920 --> 51:41.920]  I want to focus on the U.S. attorneys and the judges that have been thwarting Trump's political issues.
[51:41.920 --> 51:45.920]  They've been ruling against him and he's not happy about that. That's immediate.
[51:45.920 --> 51:52.920]  The CFPB and the bank issue is not quite so immediate.
[51:52.920 --> 52:01.920]  We got Trump looking at an election coming up and well, his elections, he's only been in since 17.
[52:01.920 --> 52:13.920]  So he's not coming up quite yet. But we need to frame this in a way that will look like it will be good for him.
[52:13.920 --> 52:16.920]  If there's a bad side, let him try to figure that out.
[52:16.920 --> 52:24.920]  But it may be enough that we make these noises.
[52:24.920 --> 52:33.920]  Maybe those noises inside the other noises and the bank issues and the foreclosure issue and their attorneys,
[52:33.920 --> 52:40.920]  like this attorney of mine that's against me that is completely violating the law by coercing these public officials
[52:40.920 --> 52:51.920]  and they're committing perjury in their papers and then our Supreme Court and the State Bar are doing nothing.
[52:51.920 --> 52:56.920]  Maybe we just slide those under the radar at the bottom of the pile that you put in.
[52:56.920 --> 53:03.920]  Well, there's another consideration in that regard and that's the voter.
[53:03.920 --> 53:17.920]  There was a time when the only time that the neoconservative considered the inequities of the courts was when they got a traffic ticket.
[53:17.920 --> 53:27.920]  Now, after this housing catastrophe, everybody recognizes the courts as absolutely corrupt.
[53:27.920 --> 53:42.920]  And even especially the heartland, the middle of the road guys, the ones who were most hammered by this last economic crash,
[53:42.920 --> 53:48.920]  this is still fresh on them of being screwed big time.
[53:48.920 --> 53:52.920]  And Trump is going to want to play to these guys.
[53:52.920 --> 53:59.920]  He's not going to want to look like he's protecting the banks that screwed them.
[53:59.920 --> 54:01.920]  Politics.
[54:01.920 --> 54:07.920]  This is a show about rule of law, but at the end of the day, it's about the politics.
[54:07.920 --> 54:12.920]  If we don't consider the politics, rule of law won't help us very much.
[54:12.920 --> 54:16.920]  But that's very good points you raise.
[54:16.920 --> 54:18.920]  Okay, well, good.
[54:18.920 --> 54:24.920]  I'll let someone else come on the phone and I'll think of some things for you tomorrow.
[54:24.920 --> 54:26.920]  Okay, thank you, Tina.
[54:26.920 --> 54:31.920]  Okay, now we're going to go to Jerry in Pennsylvania.
[54:31.920 --> 54:36.920]  Hello Jerry, what have you been up to?
[54:36.920 --> 54:39.920]  Hello, Randy, I got these lawsuits.
[54:39.920 --> 54:47.920]  They came back from federal court and they dismissed one without prejudice.
[54:47.920 --> 54:51.920]  They dismissed one with prejudice.
[54:51.920 --> 54:56.920]  And the other two, I'm not too sure, dismissed without prejudice.
[54:56.920 --> 54:58.920]  And one for the lawyer.
[54:58.920 --> 55:01.920]  They haven't listed, but I don't know what happened.
[55:01.920 --> 55:04.920]  So they didn't send nothing back on it.
[55:04.920 --> 55:09.920]  I was just wondering how to proceed with these.
[55:09.920 --> 55:14.920]  Could you give me some idea?
[55:14.920 --> 55:19.920]  Well, you got four lawsuits, you got four different rulings.
[55:19.920 --> 55:24.920]  I'm sure it's federal, so you got a judgment.
[55:24.920 --> 55:30.920]  The first thing you're going to want to do is file a motion for reconsideration.
[55:30.920 --> 55:38.920]  Let's stop the appellate clock and you'll have like 30 days or so to file a motion for reconsideration.
[55:38.920 --> 55:42.920]  Then you look at the ruling that they gave you.
[55:42.920 --> 55:53.920]  See if you can poke some holes in the ruling they gave you and file a petition for reconsideration.
[55:53.920 --> 56:02.920]  And that allows you to enter case law on the record for the appellate court.
[56:02.920 --> 56:04.920]  So you got four cases.
[56:04.920 --> 56:09.920]  Two were dismissed with prejudice, two without.
[56:09.920 --> 56:11.920]  Is that correct?
[56:11.920 --> 56:13.920]  Yeah.
[56:13.920 --> 56:16.920]  Okay, the two without prejudice.
[56:16.920 --> 56:22.920]  Were they the same or similar?
[56:22.920 --> 56:27.920]  The two cases dismissed without prejudice.
[56:27.920 --> 56:32.920]  Were they essentially the same or were they different?
[56:32.920 --> 56:39.920]  No, they're all a little different because they were different people I was through with.
[56:39.920 --> 56:46.920]  I started out with the coding enforcement officer, went to the city attorney,
[56:46.920 --> 56:54.920]  went to the J.P. and sued the jail too and I'll sue somebody else there.
[56:54.920 --> 56:56.920]  I don't know what else to do here.
[56:56.920 --> 57:00.920]  But that's as far as I got.
[57:00.920 --> 57:06.920]  I don't know what else to add into my pleadings here on this.
[57:06.920 --> 57:19.920]  Well, see, you're not telling me anything that's in the pleadings so I have no way to comment on those suits on what you should or should not do.
[57:19.920 --> 57:26.920]  If you look up the numbers, would you give me some insight on what to do?
[57:26.920 --> 57:30.920]  If I look up the numbers.
[57:30.920 --> 57:41.920]  I don't know, it would be way too time consuming for me to pull down all of these suits and read all the pleadings without knowing what they're about.
[57:41.920 --> 57:45.920]  That's a study I just do not have time for.
[57:45.920 --> 57:48.920]  No, I mean just what the court sent me.
[57:48.920 --> 57:50.920]  The two pages there.
[57:50.920 --> 57:56.920]  Well, tell me, give me a synopsis of what it says.
[57:56.920 --> 58:02.920]  Well, what that sent me back is says here complaint.
[58:02.920 --> 58:04.920]  Okay, hold on.
[58:04.920 --> 58:05.920]  We're getting close to break.
[58:05.920 --> 58:08.920]  We've only got about 45 seconds.
[58:08.920 --> 58:09.920]  Over break.
[58:09.920 --> 58:10.920]  Look at it.
[58:10.920 --> 58:18.920]  So when we come back, you can kind of give me a general idea of what's going on and what the court ruled and then I can ask more specific questions.
[58:18.920 --> 58:27.920]  And when I can get down to some details, why am I actually be able to give you some constructive consideration?
[58:27.920 --> 58:28.920]  Okay, hold on.
[58:28.920 --> 58:32.920]  We're going to our sponsors over the break.
[58:32.920 --> 58:33.920]  Check them out.
[58:33.920 --> 58:36.920]  Help us support this radio station.
[58:36.920 --> 58:38.920]  We're struggling to keep it on the air.
[58:38.920 --> 58:40.920]  We need all the help we can get.
[58:40.920 --> 58:49.920]  We'll be right back.
[58:49.920 --> 58:57.920]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.920 --> 59:05.920]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:05.920 --> 59:08.920]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.920 --> 59:17.920]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.920 --> 59:27.920]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.920 --> 59:32.920]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.920 --> 59:47.920]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.920 --> 59:52.920]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:52.920 --> 01:00:00.920]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.920 --> 01:00:05.920]  Thank you for following these flashes brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:30.920 --> 01:00:59.920]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and entering 40.
[01:00:59.920 --> 01:01:23.920]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven to Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the earth for THC.
[01:01:23.920 --> 01:01:32.920]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:32.920 --> 01:02:00.920]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the district attorney, in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat, who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:00.920 --> 01:02:12.920]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:12.920 --> 01:02:21.920]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:02:21.920 --> 01:02:38.920]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:38.920 --> 01:02:50.920]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:50.920 --> 01:02:58.920]  This is Roof Roadie with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:20.920 --> 01:03:46.920]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:46.920 --> 01:03:57.920]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain moved our radio on this Thursday, the 31st day of October, 2019, and we're talking to Jury in Pennsylvania.
[01:03:57.920 --> 01:04:02.920]  Okay, four suits, two with prejudice, two without prejudice.
[01:04:02.920 --> 01:04:08.920]  What were the without prejudice claims in the suit?
[01:04:08.920 --> 01:04:15.920]  What were you, who were you suing and what was the nature of the claim?
[01:04:15.920 --> 01:04:26.920]  The one without prejudice was the Bush County Correctional Facility.
[01:04:26.920 --> 01:04:29.920]  The court shall not make...
[01:04:29.920 --> 01:04:30.920]  Okay, hold on, Jury.
[01:04:30.920 --> 01:04:33.920]  Move your mic a little away from your mouth.
[01:04:33.920 --> 01:04:35.920]  You're distorting.
[01:04:35.920 --> 01:04:37.920]  It's too loud and it's distorting.
[01:04:37.920 --> 01:04:44.920]  I'm not getting, I can hear you real loud, but I can't understand what you're saying.
[01:04:44.920 --> 01:04:52.920]  Okay, it says here, this is a failed file and a gender complaint.
[01:04:52.920 --> 01:05:00.920]  The coordinates with this order, this case may be dismissed without further notice, if I were to prosecute.
[01:05:00.920 --> 01:05:01.920]  Okay, hold on.
[01:05:01.920 --> 01:05:06.920]  The court asked for an amended complaint?
[01:05:06.920 --> 01:05:09.920]  For what?
[01:05:09.920 --> 01:05:14.920]  Did the court ask for an amended complaint?
[01:05:14.920 --> 01:05:20.920]  Oh, yeah, they said that I could send this one back in.
[01:05:20.920 --> 01:05:28.920]  Okay, did you amend the complaint in accordance with the directions of the court and send it back to them?
[01:05:28.920 --> 01:05:33.920]  No, they didn't send no direction.
[01:05:33.920 --> 01:05:42.920]  Okay, the court will never ask for an amended complaint unless they tell you what's wrong.
[01:05:42.920 --> 01:05:45.920]  You need to read their order real careful.
[01:05:45.920 --> 01:05:48.920]  What the courts do...
[01:05:48.920 --> 01:05:50.920]  Did they fight something?
[01:05:50.920 --> 01:05:54.920]  Failed with the claim.
[01:05:54.920 --> 01:05:59.920]  Okay, did they tell you what was wrong with the claim?
[01:05:59.920 --> 01:06:01.920]  No, they said failure...
[01:06:01.920 --> 01:06:10.920]  They might say it's not compliant with and they'll give a little some sight of statute or something.
[01:06:10.920 --> 01:06:15.920]  The courts, they tell both sides what's wrong with their pleadings.
[01:06:15.920 --> 01:06:29.920]  The courts, they want to get the best facts and the best law so that they can compare the two and find a just adjudication of the case based on the facts and the law.
[01:06:29.920 --> 01:06:39.920]  So if you file a pleading and you've missed something and the court looks at it and they say, I don't have what I need so I can't give you a proper ruling here.
[01:06:39.920 --> 01:06:41.920]  This is what I need.
[01:06:41.920 --> 01:06:43.920]  Give me what I need.
[01:06:43.920 --> 01:06:46.920]  And they will do the same thing to the other side.
[01:06:46.920 --> 01:06:52.920]  You miss this, this, you give me that part and then I can get a proper adjudication.
[01:06:52.920 --> 01:07:05.920]  So especially the federal courts, when they render a ruling, pay close attention to the ruling they give you because they will be instructing you on how to give them what they need.
[01:07:05.920 --> 01:07:07.920]  This is from Harmon Taylor.
[01:07:07.920 --> 01:07:12.920]  He was a lawyer and he gave up his bar card in disgust.
[01:07:12.920 --> 01:07:19.920]  But that's how he treated the courts is they're always trying to instruct the lawyers who file with the courts.
[01:07:19.920 --> 01:07:22.920]  So we do pleading real careful.
[01:07:22.920 --> 01:07:29.920]  And if you, if they asked you for an amended pleading and you didn't give them one, they're going to dismiss.
[01:07:29.920 --> 01:07:36.920]  But if they dismissed without prejudice, then you can refile.
[01:07:36.920 --> 01:07:37.920]  Okay.
[01:07:37.920 --> 01:07:43.920]  So the one that was dismissed, which by the way, if I can't refile on it?
[01:07:43.920 --> 01:07:44.920]  No.
[01:07:44.920 --> 01:07:48.920]  Let's talk about the one of those.
[01:07:48.920 --> 01:07:58.920]  What was the nature of the claim that supported with prejudice?
[01:07:58.920 --> 01:08:00.920]  One with prejudice.
[01:08:00.920 --> 01:08:01.920]  Yeah.
[01:08:01.920 --> 01:08:02.920]  What did they say?
[01:08:02.920 --> 01:08:15.920]  Generally, when they dismiss with prejudice, that means that they don't believe there is any way you can reform this claim so that it would be a viable claim.
[01:08:15.920 --> 01:08:20.920]  What did you claim in that suit?
[01:08:20.920 --> 01:08:24.920]  The one with prejudice.
[01:08:24.920 --> 01:08:25.920]  Yes.
[01:08:25.920 --> 01:08:39.920]  I claim that the defendant, J.P., didn't follow the procedure in law, the process, you know.
[01:08:39.920 --> 01:08:43.920]  How did you make that claim?
[01:08:43.920 --> 01:08:52.920]  Oh, I just explained to him, like, you know, the Constitution, Article 3, 1, 2, 10, tells you how laws are made.
[01:08:52.920 --> 01:09:00.920]  I took the subject matter to a system out of your file that he sent me, that one with Tim in North down there.
[01:09:00.920 --> 01:09:01.920]  Yes.
[01:09:01.920 --> 01:09:13.920]  I put that in there, too, and a few other things that you were talking about that I've been listening to, and I sent the whole thing down to him.
[01:09:13.920 --> 01:09:15.920]  Okay.
[01:09:15.920 --> 01:09:26.920]  The way you said that to me tells me that you did not address your case specifically enough for the federal court.
[01:09:26.920 --> 01:09:36.920]  In this instance, you have to talk to this issue in the terms of case law.
[01:09:36.920 --> 01:09:50.920]  You're speaking to a justice of the peace, and if you're saying that a justice of the peace fails, say, for instance, to hold a proper examining trial,
[01:09:50.920 --> 01:09:59.920]  you would say that he failed to hold a proper examining trial in accordance with the requirements of Gerstein Pugh.
[01:09:59.920 --> 01:10:02.920]  Case law.
[01:10:02.920 --> 01:10:09.920]  You can't make a vague and general claim with the federal courts.
[01:10:09.920 --> 01:10:21.920]  You have to make your claim very specific, and you have to make it in terms of case law as the case law supports the statutory law.
[01:10:21.920 --> 01:10:24.920]  I'll call on my wording then.
[01:10:24.920 --> 01:10:28.920]  Most likely is. You just didn't give them enough in there.
[01:10:28.920 --> 01:10:32.920]  You can't just go in there and say, this guy is a bad guy.
[01:10:32.920 --> 01:10:38.920]  You have to go in there and say, this is what this guy was required to do.
[01:10:38.920 --> 01:10:42.920]  This is what he did, and this is what's wrong with what he did.
[01:10:42.920 --> 01:10:49.920]  And this is the law that supports my contention that what he did was wrong.
[01:10:49.920 --> 01:11:01.920]  So what you're saying is I should take that case law that you had with Tim North and reread that whole thing, and then when I write mine,
[01:11:01.920 --> 01:11:04.920]  write it similar to that, huh?
[01:11:04.920 --> 01:11:11.920]  Well, not necessarily when you say similar.
[01:11:11.920 --> 01:11:17.920]  Similar in style and citation.
[01:11:17.920 --> 01:11:26.920]  Not necessarily similar in form or certainly not necessarily similar in the specifics.
[01:11:26.920 --> 01:11:33.920]  But you notice in that case, we never make a proactive statement of law out of our own mouth.
[01:11:33.920 --> 01:11:40.920]  We say, you know, the code says this, the case law supporting the code says this.
[01:11:40.920 --> 01:11:44.920]  We don't say you're supposed to do this thing.
[01:11:44.920 --> 01:11:49.920]  We say the code says you're supposed to do this thing.
[01:11:49.920 --> 01:11:53.920]  Or the case law says you're supposed to do this thing.
[01:11:53.920 --> 01:11:57.920]  So in that regard, yes, it would need to be similar.
[01:11:57.920 --> 01:12:04.920]  Just always keep in your mind, you can never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[01:12:04.920 --> 01:12:10.920]  You can never tell the judge what he's supposed to do because it sounds right.
[01:12:10.920 --> 01:12:14.920]  And because he is right, they're making don't make any difference.
[01:12:14.920 --> 01:12:23.920]  You have to give the judge facts and law that support those facts.
[01:12:23.920 --> 01:12:31.920]  That fact and law leads to a conclusion you maintain you should come to.
[01:12:31.920 --> 01:12:33.920]  Does that make sense?
[01:12:33.920 --> 01:12:34.920]  Yeah.
[01:12:34.920 --> 01:12:42.920]  So in other words, you think pretty much on the right track, it's just that I don't have enough practice.
[01:12:42.920 --> 01:12:43.920]  Yeah.
[01:12:43.920 --> 01:12:45.920]  And this is what it sounds like.
[01:12:45.920 --> 01:12:47.920]  This is a process.
[01:12:47.920 --> 01:12:53.920]  It's different than like writing a letter to somebody or writing an explanation.
[01:12:53.920 --> 01:12:58.920]  You can explain stuff to us about what's going on, but that's different.
[01:12:58.920 --> 01:13:05.920]  Writing a pleading is a very focused, structured methodology.
[01:13:05.920 --> 01:13:14.920]  That's what legal 101 has a whole section in there on how to write legal pleadings.
[01:13:14.920 --> 01:13:17.920]  And it talks to those issues.
[01:13:17.920 --> 01:13:18.920]  All right.
[01:13:18.920 --> 01:13:20.920]  I'll go look that up.
[01:13:20.920 --> 01:13:26.920]  And now we got to, and then I'll, I'll rewrite this thing and then send it in.
[01:13:26.920 --> 01:13:27.920]  Yeah.
[01:13:27.920 --> 01:13:28.920]  And it doesn't make better.
[01:13:28.920 --> 01:13:32.920]  It's better so much if you do a great job.
[01:13:32.920 --> 01:13:39.920]  If the judge, you're pro say, and the judge is saying to you, you need to do things different.
[01:13:39.920 --> 01:13:48.920]  One of the things I very much like to do when I'm writing an amended pleading is state that
[01:13:48.920 --> 01:13:58.920]  the other side's criticism is well taken or the court's criticism is well taken.
[01:13:58.920 --> 01:14:06.920]  And then show how I responded to that criticism to try to improve the pleadings.
[01:14:06.920 --> 01:14:15.920]  This will get the courts to go to some pretty serious links to accommodate you.
[01:14:15.920 --> 01:14:23.920]  When your court tries to give you good advice and you tell the court that you appreciate their
[01:14:23.920 --> 01:14:30.920]  advice and you're attempting to take their advice, they will go a long way to accommodate you.
[01:14:30.920 --> 01:14:31.920]  Okay.
[01:14:31.920 --> 01:14:32.920]  All right.
[01:14:32.920 --> 01:14:39.920]  That could be the reason why I sent some motions in over the past year or two, and they never
[01:14:39.920 --> 01:14:40.920]  acted on them.
[01:14:40.920 --> 01:14:41.920]  So what do you think?
[01:14:41.920 --> 01:14:43.920]  They didn't like the way I wrote them either?
[01:14:43.920 --> 01:14:49.920]  Well, you can't just, in the federal court, if you send in a motion, you have to ask the
[01:14:49.920 --> 01:14:53.920]  court to set the motion for hearing.
[01:14:53.920 --> 01:14:59.920]  If you don't put it on for hearing, it never gets put on for hearing.
[01:14:59.920 --> 01:15:06.920]  I should have went up there on Friday when I had the motion hearings and took them before
[01:15:06.920 --> 01:15:08.920]  a judge and gave it to him, huh?
[01:15:08.920 --> 01:15:09.920]  Yeah.
[01:15:09.920 --> 01:15:15.920]  Well, no, you have to contact the clerk, and the clerk will generally refer you to the
[01:15:15.920 --> 01:15:17.920]  judge's coordinator.
[01:15:17.920 --> 01:15:20.920]  The judge has his own clerk.
[01:15:20.920 --> 01:15:22.920]  Sometimes they call him a clerk.
[01:15:22.920 --> 01:15:26.920]  Sometimes they call an administrative assistant or coordinator.
[01:15:26.920 --> 01:15:28.920]  It's the judge's secretary.
[01:15:28.920 --> 01:15:33.920]  It's the, that's the person who keeps the judge's calendar.
[01:15:33.920 --> 01:15:38.920]  So you go file a motion, and then you get a hold of the person who keeps the judge's
[01:15:38.920 --> 01:15:43.920]  calendar and ask them, when does the judge hear motions?
[01:15:43.920 --> 01:15:44.920]  Yeah.
[01:15:44.920 --> 01:15:51.920]  Because a lot of times the courts will set aside a dead day or a time when they will hear
[01:15:51.920 --> 01:15:52.920]  motions.
[01:15:52.920 --> 01:15:57.920]  Most motions are addressed very quickly.
[01:15:57.920 --> 01:16:01.920]  I've stood in court and there's a whole line of lawyers up there, and they go up there,
[01:16:01.920 --> 01:16:04.920]  and the one lawyer says, blah, blah, blah, and the other says, blah, blah, blah, and
[01:16:04.920 --> 01:16:09.920]  the judge says, boom, next, and just walks right through them, because most of these
[01:16:09.920 --> 01:16:11.920]  motions are pretty straightforward.
[01:16:11.920 --> 01:16:15.920]  There are technical stuff the lawyers have to get through.
[01:16:15.920 --> 01:16:23.920]  So find when the judge sits for motion hearings and asks the clerk to put this, you ask the
[01:16:23.920 --> 01:16:27.920]  clerk, can I put this motion on for hearing this day, will the judge have time?
[01:16:27.920 --> 01:16:32.920]  And if the clerk says yes, then you go to the district clerk where you file the pleadings
[01:16:32.920 --> 01:16:36.920]  and say, okay, I talked to his coordinator and he said this would be a good day.
[01:16:36.920 --> 01:16:38.920]  Set it for this day.
[01:16:38.920 --> 01:16:41.920]  Then you get it put on for hearing.
[01:16:41.920 --> 01:16:43.920]  Hang on.
[01:16:43.920 --> 01:16:46.920]  About to go to our sponsors.
[01:16:46.920 --> 01:16:51.920]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:51.920 --> 01:16:54.920]  We've got another hour and 45 minutes.
[01:16:54.920 --> 01:16:56.920]  We've got John left.
[01:16:56.920 --> 01:17:25.920]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:26.920 --> 01:17:48.920]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:48.920 --> 01:18:14.920]  We'll be right back.
[01:18:14.920 --> 01:18:40.920]  We'll be right back.
[01:18:44.920 --> 01:19:10.920]  We'll be right back.
[01:19:14.920 --> 01:19:29.920]  We'll be right back.
[01:19:29.920 --> 01:19:30.920]  Okay.
[01:19:30.920 --> 01:19:31.920]  We're back.
[01:19:31.920 --> 01:19:32.920]  I lied.
[01:19:32.920 --> 01:19:34.920]  I said hour and 45 minutes.
[01:19:34.920 --> 01:19:36.920]  We've got 45 minutes.
[01:19:36.920 --> 01:19:42.920]  And Jerry, this was a good opportunity to talk about the parts of how a court works.
[01:19:42.920 --> 01:19:45.920]  It's not really in the books.
[01:19:45.920 --> 01:19:51.920]  It is the duty of the judge to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[01:19:51.920 --> 01:19:55.920]  then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[01:19:55.920 --> 01:19:57.920]  That's his primary duty.
[01:19:57.920 --> 01:20:15.920]  Now, he has other authorities and abilities that go to maintaining civility and the effective control of the courts.
[01:20:15.920 --> 01:20:19.920]  Now, he can find people in contempt and he can do these other things,
[01:20:19.920 --> 01:20:28.920]  but they all rotate around being able to determine the facts, accordance with the rules of evidence, and apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[01:20:28.920 --> 01:20:38.920]  I once sat as a judge in a mock trial in Massachusetts for a legal reform guy who had had the State of Pennsylvania coming after him.
[01:20:38.920 --> 01:20:43.920]  And they picked a jury off the street, a mock jury, and Pastor Massett had me sit as the judge.
[01:20:43.920 --> 01:20:47.920]  It was an eye-opening experience.
[01:20:47.920 --> 01:20:50.920]  These are legal reform guys.
[01:20:50.920 --> 01:20:52.920]  We're on their side.
[01:20:52.920 --> 01:20:56.920]  And they're up there making these patriot mythology arguments.
[01:20:56.920 --> 01:21:01.920]  And I'm sitting here tapping my fingers and says, okay, maybe I agree with all this stuff.
[01:21:01.920 --> 01:21:07.920]  But in order for me sitting as a judge to render a ruling, you got to give me facts.
[01:21:07.920 --> 01:21:10.920]  And then you got to give me law that I can apply to those facts.
[01:21:10.920 --> 01:21:12.920]  And I'm not getting that.
[01:21:12.920 --> 01:21:15.920]  Now, I'm really getting frustrated.
[01:21:15.920 --> 01:21:18.920]  And I watch judges do the same thing.
[01:21:18.920 --> 01:21:29.920]  They got to sit here and listen to you, feet giving them a lot of junk that they can't use, and times when they know you have a case.
[01:21:29.920 --> 01:21:34.920]  But you're not giving them a way to rule in your favor.
[01:21:34.920 --> 01:21:38.920]  And this is especially true in the federal courts.
[01:21:38.920 --> 01:21:46.920]  They will tell you what is wrong with your pleadings, pay close attention to their rulings.
[01:21:46.920 --> 01:21:53.920]  They're saying, this is what's wrong with your pleadings, and this is what you got to do to fix them.
[01:21:53.920 --> 01:21:57.920]  But it's okay for them to do that to you.
[01:21:57.920 --> 01:22:03.920]  They're not playing favorites because they do the exact same thing to the other side.
[01:22:03.920 --> 01:22:09.920]  Because they want a good adjudication of the case.
[01:22:09.920 --> 01:22:13.920]  So, pay attention to what he told you.
[01:22:13.920 --> 01:22:21.920]  The only thing he can rule on is facts and law as it applies to the facts.
[01:22:21.920 --> 01:22:25.920]  That will pretty well tell you how to recraft these documents.
[01:22:25.920 --> 01:22:32.920]  Treat these suits as your legal education because this is the best education you can have.
[01:22:32.920 --> 01:22:38.920]  Oh, I was wondering why you were so quiet.
[01:22:38.920 --> 01:22:39.920]  Okay.
[01:22:39.920 --> 01:22:40.920]  There you go.
[01:22:40.920 --> 01:22:42.920]  I actually unmuted you.
[01:22:42.920 --> 01:22:43.920]  Oh, yeah.
[01:22:43.920 --> 01:22:48.920]  Well, I'm going to look up your 101 there.
[01:22:48.920 --> 01:22:51.920]  I've been getting a get short, but I hadn't quite.
[01:22:51.920 --> 01:22:57.920]  I guess that's pretty much can you some idea how to really write this thing, huh?
[01:22:57.920 --> 01:22:58.920]  Yes, it will.
[01:22:58.920 --> 01:23:05.920]  The first part of it is basically how the legal system really works.
[01:23:05.920 --> 01:23:08.920]  The first section are legal fallacies.
[01:23:08.920 --> 01:23:16.920]  And then I go into a basic understanding of the politics of the courts.
[01:23:16.920 --> 01:23:23.920]  And it's about the third section where I talk about how to construct legal pleadings.
[01:23:23.920 --> 01:23:29.920]  A lot of it is probably more advanced than you need at this point.
[01:23:29.920 --> 01:23:38.920]  I have a large section there on mental flow that may be a little too advanced for this particular application.
[01:23:38.920 --> 01:23:48.920]  But you go to the part about building pleadings where I talk about all the different parts that go into a pleading and how to construct those.
[01:23:48.920 --> 01:23:51.920]  That should be very helpful.
[01:23:51.920 --> 01:24:02.920]  I do present a formatting structure that I essentially designed myself over the years.
[01:24:02.920 --> 01:24:15.920]  But it's nothing really outrageous when you construct a pleading, when you write an argument.
[01:24:15.920 --> 01:24:22.920]  Discipline yourself into putting a heading on every paragraph.
[01:24:22.920 --> 01:24:24.920]  If you want, we can do this off the air.
[01:24:24.920 --> 01:24:35.920]  I can take you through how to use Microsoft Word and use the headings section in Microsoft Word.
[01:24:35.920 --> 01:24:39.920]  The heading section, never type a heading by hand.
[01:24:39.920 --> 01:24:45.920]  It has a heading section where you can select a heading style.
[01:24:45.920 --> 01:24:52.920]  You type what you want to say, you highlight it, and then you click on that heading style.
[01:24:52.920 --> 01:24:59.920]  Microsoft Word uses those heading styles to create a table of contents.
[01:24:59.920 --> 01:25:12.920]  So when you build a larger legal pleading, if you put a heading on every paragraph or every other paragraph, everywhere you change the subject you're speaking to,
[01:25:12.920 --> 01:25:18.920]  then you can just go to table of contents and boom, it'll spit it right out for you.
[01:25:18.920 --> 01:25:27.920]  But more important than that, you have a navigation pane you can open and it keeps a running table of contents.
[01:25:27.920 --> 01:25:38.920]  So you're building this big document, you argue all these different issues, and if you put a heading on every paragraph, then once you get to the bottom of an argument,
[01:25:38.920 --> 01:25:47.920]  you go back and look at that navigation pane that's like a little floating table of contents and look at your headings.
[01:25:47.920 --> 01:25:55.920]  You'll be surprised how often you have almost exactly the same headings on more than one paragraph.
[01:25:55.920 --> 01:26:04.920]  Oops, this happens a lot in legal documents because they're generally so complex.
[01:26:04.920 --> 01:26:16.920]  You argue issues that are close to one another and if you're not careful, you wind up arguing the same issue in two different places in two different ways.
[01:26:16.920 --> 01:26:26.920]  That's one problem. The other problem is keeping your document logically flowing from one argument to the next.
[01:26:26.920 --> 01:26:37.920]  And by breaking, putting a heading on every paragraph that forces you to focus in this paragraph, I'm only going to talk on this.
[01:26:37.920 --> 01:26:50.920]  And a lot of times you can go in and take out those headings once you're done, but you need that mental directive that keeps you from doing a paragraph that's a half a page long.
[01:26:50.920 --> 01:26:59.920]  I mean, everybody who's read legal documents, read these documents that's got a page and a half and no breaks in it.
[01:26:59.920 --> 01:27:04.920]  Nobody can put all that garbage in their brain at once.
[01:27:04.920 --> 01:27:16.920]  Even when I do relatively big emails, I go into the email and every time I change what I'm basically what I'm talking about, I put a heading in there.
[01:27:16.920 --> 01:27:29.920]  That way you can just zip down the email to the part you want to read rather than having to dig through sentence after sentence after sentence after sentence or paragraph after paragraph after paragraph to find what you're looking for.
[01:27:29.920 --> 01:27:36.920]  It breaks it apart into pieces and your reader, it gives your reader direction.
[01:27:36.920 --> 01:27:48.920]  Yes, it takes up more space on the page, but at the end of the day, it saves space and your reader always knows where he's at in the document.
[01:27:48.920 --> 01:27:53.920]  So do you use a word processor?
[01:27:53.920 --> 01:28:05.920]  Oh, yeah. Well, what I do is I handwrite everything out. I handwrite something out, place the document with it, then I go to the next one, handwrite it out.
[01:28:05.920 --> 01:28:10.920]  Stop doing that. Stop doing that. Use your word processor.
[01:28:10.920 --> 01:28:21.920]  Because when you handwrite things out, it's really hard to take a sentence that looks pretty good, but you've got a sentence in the middle here that should be in this other paragraph.
[01:28:21.920 --> 01:28:26.920]  I was writing one today and I did that over and over. I'm going all over this document.
[01:28:26.920 --> 01:28:32.920]  I got all my arguments in there, but I got them in and out of place. I got them out of order.
[01:28:32.920 --> 01:28:37.920]  I got half of one argument and half of another argument in one paragraph.
[01:28:37.920 --> 01:28:46.920]  If you do it by hand, it's really hard to make, really find who you're verbiage.
[01:28:46.920 --> 01:28:53.920]  Jerry, are you saying that you handwrite it as part of your preparation work?
[01:28:53.920 --> 01:28:57.920]  Or are you saying that you handwrite it as the result?
[01:28:57.920 --> 01:29:05.920]  Once you have it figured out what you want, then you make a new fresh copy that's all handwritten.
[01:29:05.920 --> 01:29:11.920]  Well, see, my problem is I've been doing this for about a year and a half now since listening to you guys.
[01:29:11.920 --> 01:29:21.920]  I start something and then it takes me like a day or two to get it all together because something pops into my mind during the day while I'm out working or something.
[01:29:21.920 --> 01:29:24.920]  And when I come in, I write it down.
[01:29:24.920 --> 01:29:27.920]  Oh, yeah, that's great. That's great.
[01:29:27.920 --> 01:29:36.920]  But when you're writing, when you're constructing the document, you want to be able to easily move sentences and paragraphs around.
[01:29:36.920 --> 01:29:42.920]  When I do them handwritten, I can't fine tune this thing.
[01:29:42.920 --> 01:29:44.920]  Hang on.
[01:29:44.920 --> 01:29:46.920]  About to go to our sponsors.
[01:29:46.920 --> 01:29:48.920]  I'll call in number.
[01:29:48.920 --> 01:29:50.920]  Okay, we've got two more colleagues.
[01:29:50.920 --> 01:29:52.920]  We've got Tim and John.
[01:29:52.920 --> 01:29:55.920]  We'll finish out the show on those two.
[01:29:55.920 --> 01:29:57.920]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:57.920 --> 01:30:08.920]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:30:08.920 --> 01:30:12.920]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:12.920 --> 01:30:15.920]  I'm Dr. Kaepernald Rekt, back with details in a moment.
[01:30:15.920 --> 01:30:17.920]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.920 --> 01:30:21.920]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.920 --> 01:30:26.920]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.920 --> 01:30:28.920]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.920 --> 01:30:32.920]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.920 --> 01:30:34.920]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.920 --> 01:30:41.920]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.920 --> 01:30:45.920]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.920 --> 01:30:48.920]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:48.920 --> 01:30:52.920]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart.
[01:30:52.920 --> 01:30:55.920]  But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:30:55.920 --> 01:30:59.920]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:30:59.920 --> 01:31:03.920]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:03.920 --> 01:31:09.920]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:09.920 --> 01:31:15.920]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:15.920 --> 01:31:17.920]  So take a deep breath and chill out.
[01:31:17.920 --> 01:31:20.920]  It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:20.920 --> 01:31:23.920]  I'm Dr. Kaepernald Rekt for StartPage.com,
[01:31:23.920 --> 01:31:30.920]  the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.920 --> 01:31:36.920]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.920 --> 01:31:38.920]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.920 --> 01:31:43.920]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.920 --> 01:31:46.920]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.920 --> 01:31:48.920]  Thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:31:48.920 --> 01:31:50.920]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.920 --> 01:31:51.920]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.920 --> 01:31:52.920]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.920 --> 01:31:53.920]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.920 --> 01:31:55.920]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.920 --> 01:31:57.920]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.920 --> 01:32:01.920]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.920 --> 01:32:05.920]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.920 --> 01:32:07.920]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society,
[01:32:07.920 --> 01:32:09.920]  and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:09.920 --> 01:32:12.920]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:12.920 --> 01:32:15.920]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:15.920 --> 01:32:17.920]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:17.920 --> 01:32:19.920]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:19.920 --> 01:32:22.920]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:22.920 --> 01:32:25.920]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.920 --> 01:32:27.920]  Former Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig,
[01:32:27.920 --> 01:32:28.920]  in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:28.920 --> 01:32:31.920]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.920 --> 01:32:33.920]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:33.920 --> 01:32:35.920]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.920 --> 01:32:37.920]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:37.920 --> 01:32:40.920]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.920 --> 01:32:42.920]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:42.920 --> 01:32:45.920]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Life,
[01:32:45.920 --> 01:32:47.920]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:47.920 --> 01:32:50.920]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.920 --> 01:32:52.920]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[01:32:52.920 --> 01:32:54.920]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.920 --> 01:32:57.920]  Order your copy today and together we can have a free society
[01:32:57.920 --> 01:32:59.920]  we all want and deserve.
[01:33:01.920 --> 01:33:04.920]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:33:04.920 --> 01:33:07.920]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:12.920 --> 01:33:14.920]  Yeah, who do you want to ship? Who do you think we are?
[01:33:14.920 --> 01:33:16.920]  We don't know.
[01:33:16.920 --> 01:33:17.920]  Well, we want to ship it.
[01:33:17.920 --> 01:33:18.920]  We're not free.
[01:33:18.920 --> 01:33:19.920]  Don't know who we are.
[01:33:19.920 --> 01:33:20.920]  Come and get me.
[01:33:20.920 --> 01:33:21.920]  Come on your fuck.
[01:33:21.920 --> 01:33:23.460]  Don't let them gimme when morningants
[01:33:23.460 --> 01:33:24.820] cipienton evening
[01:33:24.820 --> 01:33:26.320]  with a chip in our bodies
[01:33:26.320 --> 01:33:28.920]  and anyway you got computer ready
[01:33:28.920 --> 01:33:29.920]  you can hide gems.
[01:33:29.920 --> 01:33:30.920]  So come on no body,
[01:33:30.920 --> 01:33:32.920]  with cheong走吧 to your mom
[01:33:32.920 --> 01:33:33.920]  chip in out your daddy
[01:33:33.920 --> 01:33:35.920]  chip into your grandpa and grandma
[01:33:35.920 --> 01:33:37.720]  chip into your me
[01:33:37.720 --> 01:33:38.720]  chip into your b flowing
[01:33:38.720 --> 01:33:41.920]  chapterpony
[01:33:43.920 --> 01:33:45.960]  Okay. We are back.
[01:33:45.960 --> 01:33:50.960]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountainville Law Radio, and I kind of owe you an apology, Jerry.
[01:33:50.960 --> 01:33:57.960]  I used you for the most part. I wasn't really talking directly to you.
[01:33:57.960 --> 01:34:04.960]  This is an area that I don't get to address often.
[01:34:04.960 --> 01:34:12.960]  And it's really an important area, especially for people who are trying to craft legal documents the first time.
[01:34:12.960 --> 01:34:21.960]  There are a few basics that are really, really helpful, and that's kind of what I was going to.
[01:34:21.960 --> 01:34:29.960]  So I used you. Okay. Where are we at with your cases?
[01:34:29.960 --> 01:34:37.960]  You've got two dismissed with prejudice and two dismissed without prejudice.
[01:34:37.960 --> 01:34:51.960]  Were both of the ones dismissed without prejudice dismissed essentially for the same reason that you were asked for an amended pleading and you didn't provide it?
[01:34:51.960 --> 01:35:03.960]  Well, like you said, and I'm then pleading, I guess the best thing to do is go through everything that I wrote and then rewrite it and add some more stuff into it that you forgot.
[01:35:03.960 --> 01:35:10.960]  No, no, no, no, not exactly. Generally, the judge will tell you what's missing.
[01:35:10.960 --> 01:35:21.960]  And if these were dismissed on a Rule 12b6 motion to dismiss a fairer state of claim, then the judge will tell you about your claim.
[01:35:21.960 --> 01:35:35.960]  Any claim you make, you need to look up those claims either in terms of due process or causes of action.
[01:35:35.960 --> 01:35:39.960]  All of these, like criminal complaints, have elements.
[01:35:39.960 --> 01:35:46.960]  You know, we say fraud. You can't just say fraud.
[01:35:46.960 --> 01:35:53.960]  Fraud has essential elements that must be included. Let's say fraud by non-disclosure.
[01:35:53.960 --> 01:36:06.960]  If you accuse someone of fraud by non-disclosure, you must allege that the defendant gave some disclosure.
[01:36:06.960 --> 01:36:16.960]  That the defendant withheld information that you did not have access to that information.
[01:36:16.960 --> 01:36:26.960]  That the defendant had reasonably should have known that you did not have access to that information.
[01:36:26.960 --> 01:36:36.960]  You acted based on the disclosures of the defendant and you were harmed by thereby.
[01:36:36.960 --> 01:36:44.960]  You kind of make all of those claims or you haven't made a claim for fraud by non-disclosure.
[01:36:44.960 --> 01:36:57.960]  What I was doing was like it says here, Title 18, crime and offensive code to Pennsylvania, Section 2705, Section 29.
[01:36:57.960 --> 01:37:02.960]  Hold on, hold on. That may be part of your problem.
[01:37:02.960 --> 01:37:10.960]  The commission of a crime does not necessarily give you a cause of action.
[01:37:10.960 --> 01:37:19.960]  Claiming that someone committed a crime does not allege a cause of action.
[01:37:19.960 --> 01:37:31.960]  If someone committed a crime and in the process denied you full free access to or enjoyment right, that is a cause of action.
[01:37:31.960 --> 01:37:39.960]  So you have to allege that the commission of the crime harmed you and it harmed you in this way.
[01:37:39.960 --> 01:37:48.960]  Now if it is due process, you do not have to claim that you were harmed thereby.
[01:37:48.960 --> 01:37:56.960]  A due process violation is harmed per se. It's a harm on its face.
[01:37:56.960 --> 01:38:00.960]  Other claims you must show that you were harmed by it.
[01:38:00.960 --> 01:38:06.960]  He crashed his car into my car or he ran a red light.
[01:38:06.960 --> 01:38:09.960]  That doesn't create a cause of action.
[01:38:09.960 --> 01:38:15.960]  He ran a red light and smashed into my car and bent the front bumper and I had paid to fix that.
[01:38:15.960 --> 01:38:20.960]  That's a tort. You have to show that you were harmed but thereby.
[01:38:20.960 --> 01:38:26.960]  The sum you don't have to due process is one. It's harm on its face.
[01:38:26.960 --> 01:38:32.960]  But you have to allege that due process was denied.
[01:38:32.960 --> 01:38:36.960]  You leave that out, you've made no claim.
[01:38:36.960 --> 01:38:44.960]  So the judge will tell you what details must be there for you to give a proper claim.
[01:38:44.960 --> 01:38:49.960]  That's why you pay real close attention to his judgment.
[01:38:49.960 --> 01:38:55.960]  In the Fed you get an order and a judgment.
[01:38:55.960 --> 01:39:01.960]  Both of them must be in place to have an adjudication of a ruling.
[01:39:01.960 --> 01:39:07.960]  The judgment is one. That's the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[01:39:07.960 --> 01:39:12.960]  That's the one you want to pay attention to.
[01:39:12.960 --> 01:39:20.960]  I always write that. It's a due process. I write that into my claim.
[01:39:20.960 --> 01:39:22.960]  That will do it.
[01:39:22.960 --> 01:39:33.960]  If you've claimed they violated a law and you don't claim that the violation of the law denied you in due process,
[01:39:33.960 --> 01:39:37.960]  then you have failed to state a claim of which recovery can be had.
[01:39:37.960 --> 01:39:44.960]  Okay. I've got some idea now what to do there.
[01:39:44.960 --> 01:39:52.960]  Look up how to make a due process.
[01:39:52.960 --> 01:39:56.960]  How to make a claim for violation of due process.
[01:39:56.960 --> 01:40:00.960]  You'll find some good verbiage where lawyers have done that.
[01:40:00.960 --> 01:40:03.960]  Never write these yourself if you can avoid it.
[01:40:03.960 --> 01:40:10.960]  Plage your eyes, find something a lawyer has already written, copy and pasted in.
[01:40:10.960 --> 01:40:14.960]  Oh, yeah. I'm always looking at case law.
[01:40:14.960 --> 01:40:21.960]  Good. Okay. That may be why what your problem is not having read your judgment.
[01:40:21.960 --> 01:40:26.960]  If you haven't stated that he denied you in due process, you haven't stated a claim.
[01:40:26.960 --> 01:40:28.960]  So let me fix it.
[01:40:28.960 --> 01:40:30.960]  All right. Okay.
[01:40:30.960 --> 01:40:36.960]  Hey, how many times can you fall asleep on the phone before you lose this license?
[01:40:36.960 --> 01:40:40.960]  How many six times now? Is that enough?
[01:40:40.960 --> 01:40:42.960]  No. That won't necessarily cause him to lose his license.
[01:40:42.960 --> 01:40:47.960]  It will cause him to lose his insurance.
[01:40:47.960 --> 01:40:51.960]  Well, there's freedom over that law firm that's been stopped.
[01:40:51.960 --> 01:40:56.960]  Once they have that many grievances against them,
[01:40:56.960 --> 01:41:01.960]  almost no law firm in the country will hire these scouts.
[01:41:01.960 --> 01:41:05.960]  Because if they take this guy on with another law firm
[01:41:05.960 --> 01:41:09.960]  and they give him a client and he doesn't win as much as the client thought he should,
[01:41:09.960 --> 01:41:13.960]  and the guy does a check and finds he has three, four, five or six
[01:41:13.960 --> 01:41:17.960]  bar grievances against him, he's going to say, what the heck did you do?
[01:41:17.960 --> 01:41:21.960]  You give me this flunky lawyer, then he sues the law firm.
[01:41:21.960 --> 01:41:25.960]  So it will make them almost unemployable.
[01:41:25.960 --> 01:41:28.960]  Or bar grieves are the partner of the firm.
[01:41:28.960 --> 01:41:31.960]  That'll make a partner crazy.
[01:41:31.960 --> 01:41:35.960]  Well, I don't know because they will open me letters.
[01:41:35.960 --> 01:41:39.960]  I get all freedom.
[01:41:39.960 --> 01:41:43.960]  Now, they're not going to come to you and tell you,
[01:41:43.960 --> 01:41:47.960]  you know those grievances you filed that really hurt me.
[01:41:47.960 --> 01:41:49.960]  They're going to pretend like it didn't hurt.
[01:41:49.960 --> 01:41:53.960]  You get to just sit back there and know you stung them good.
[01:41:53.960 --> 01:41:58.960]  Did you hear the recording that Brett played of the lawyer
[01:41:58.960 --> 01:42:02.960]  who thought his client might grieve him?
[01:42:02.960 --> 01:42:04.960]  Oh, yeah, I heard that one.
[01:42:04.960 --> 01:42:11.960]  And that's just because he had a little notation on the page.
[01:42:11.960 --> 01:42:13.960]  They're big deals.
[01:42:13.960 --> 01:42:16.960]  Okay, I need to move on.
[01:42:16.960 --> 01:42:17.960]  We're running out of time.
[01:42:17.960 --> 01:42:19.960]  I got two more callers.
[01:42:19.960 --> 01:42:20.960]  Oh, okay.
[01:42:20.960 --> 01:42:21.960]  Go ahead, Randy.
[01:42:21.960 --> 01:42:22.960]  Thank you.
[01:42:22.960 --> 01:42:23.960]  Okay.
[01:42:23.960 --> 01:42:24.960]  Thank you, Jerry.
[01:42:24.960 --> 01:42:29.960]  Okay, now we're going to go to Tim in Texas.
[01:42:29.960 --> 01:42:30.960]  Hello, Tim.
[01:42:30.960 --> 01:42:31.960]  Hello.
[01:42:31.960 --> 01:42:33.960]  Hello, you got a minute and a half.
[01:42:33.960 --> 01:42:34.960]  What do you got for us?
[01:42:34.960 --> 01:42:36.960]  Oh, okay.
[01:42:36.960 --> 01:42:38.960]  Let me think about it.
[01:42:38.960 --> 01:42:41.960]  You were talking about findings of facts and conclusions of law.
[01:42:41.960 --> 01:42:48.960]  And going over my record, I've got like five file boxes full.
[01:42:48.960 --> 01:42:53.960]  Not once did that judge ever answer any of my findings and facts.
[01:42:53.960 --> 01:43:00.960]  And he did the procedure with the late filings and all of that.
[01:43:00.960 --> 01:43:04.960]  And you also filed criminal charges against him for it?
[01:43:04.960 --> 01:43:05.960]  Yeah.
[01:43:05.960 --> 01:43:11.960]  And I guess that was to the district attorney and the county attorney or whoever he is.
[01:43:11.960 --> 01:43:12.960]  District.
[01:43:12.960 --> 01:43:13.960]  Yeah.
[01:43:13.960 --> 01:43:16.960]  And he never, he never did anything with them.
[01:43:16.960 --> 01:43:19.960]  So they're kind of shielding one another.
[01:43:19.960 --> 01:43:26.960]  I was going through the first thing that they filed against us in civil court and there's
[01:43:26.960 --> 01:43:33.960]  42 points and has the facts, the case, which is the majority of it.
[01:43:33.960 --> 01:43:35.960]  Then it has causes of action.
[01:43:35.960 --> 01:43:38.960]  And so looking at it.
[01:43:38.960 --> 01:43:39.960]  Okay.
[01:43:39.960 --> 01:43:41.960]  Wait, wait, hold on.
[01:43:41.960 --> 01:43:43.960]  Go into our sponsors.
[01:43:43.960 --> 01:43:47.960]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruvla Radio.
[01:43:47.960 --> 01:43:59.960]  We'll be right back.
[01:43:59.960 --> 01:44:05.960]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:05.960 --> 01:44:08.960]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:08.960 --> 01:44:10.960]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:10.960 --> 01:44:16.960]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:16.960 --> 01:44:21.960]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[01:44:21.960 --> 01:44:24.960]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:24.960 --> 01:44:30.960]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:30.960 --> 01:44:33.960]  We have come to trust Jevity so much.
[01:44:33.960 --> 01:44:38.960]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:38.960 --> 01:44:45.960]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality
[01:44:45.960 --> 01:44:46.960]  radio.
[01:44:46.960 --> 01:44:51.960]  As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.960 --> 01:44:56.960]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:44:56.960 --> 01:44:58.960]  increase your income.
[01:44:58.960 --> 01:45:00.960]  Order now.
[01:45:00.960 --> 01:45:03.960]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.960 --> 01:45:09.960]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD
[01:45:09.960 --> 01:45:14.960]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.960 --> 01:45:18.960]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.960 --> 01:45:22.960]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.960 --> 01:45:27.960]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.960 --> 01:45:33.960]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.960 --> 01:45:38.960]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:38.960 --> 01:45:42.960]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.960 --> 01:45:49.960]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.960 --> 01:45:51.960]  prosay tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.960 --> 01:45:55.960]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:55.960 --> 01:46:00.960]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.960 --> 01:46:22.960]  Hello. Oh, man, you're in jail. You got busted, man. Oh, man, I'm broken.
[01:46:22.960 --> 01:46:40.960]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Tim in Texas.
[01:46:40.960 --> 01:46:44.960]  Tim, we need to move along. We only got one segment.
[01:46:44.960 --> 01:46:48.960]  Okay. You want me to just go ahead and hang up?
[01:46:48.960 --> 01:46:51.960]  No, I want you to get to a point.
[01:46:51.960 --> 01:46:59.960]  Well, how come he doesn't have to answer those?
[01:46:59.960 --> 01:47:07.960]  We've been through this a hundred times. He can do whatever he wants to. There are consequences.
[01:47:07.960 --> 01:47:08.960]  Okay.
[01:47:08.960 --> 01:47:13.960]  And the consequence was you filed criminal charges against him with a prosecuting attorney and a
[01:47:13.960 --> 01:47:17.960]  prosecuting attorney didn't want to pursue, and you didn't pursue the prosecuting attorney.
[01:47:17.960 --> 01:47:18.960]  Oh.
[01:47:18.960 --> 01:47:24.960]  You gave your claim, but rights belong to the belligerent litigant.
[01:47:24.960 --> 01:47:25.960]  Okay.
[01:47:25.960 --> 01:47:33.960]  You cannot expect public officials to do things they don't want to do unless you kick them in their professional behind.
[01:47:33.960 --> 01:47:35.960]  Gotcha.
[01:47:35.960 --> 01:47:39.960]  Okay. Well, I guess I misunderstood that.
[01:47:39.960 --> 01:47:44.960]  Okay. I'll move along.
[01:47:44.960 --> 01:47:47.960]  Okay. You done?
[01:47:47.960 --> 01:47:49.960]  I guess he's done.
[01:47:49.960 --> 01:47:54.960]  Okay. John, what do you have for us today?
[01:47:54.960 --> 01:48:03.960]  Well, I wanted to ask you if you still wanted, it sounded like you wanted some examples of foreclosures.
[01:48:03.960 --> 01:48:04.960]  Yes.
[01:48:04.960 --> 01:48:18.960]  Well, I got about 700 examples of foreclosures. I need examples of really outrageous, horrendous treatment of litigants in foreclosures.
[01:48:18.960 --> 01:48:24.960]  Oh, this has got to stop the litigants. Trust me.
[01:48:24.960 --> 01:48:26.960]  This is going to take about 60 seconds.
[01:48:26.960 --> 01:48:37.960]  You watch foreclosure examples. I've got a real deal. This involves a home that the owners have the payoff letter and other papers to prove that they actually own the home outright.
[01:48:37.960 --> 01:48:56.960]  The hard core document proved that the bank stole it using forged documents, a dirty corrupt judge who's known as the mafioso judge that violated the home's right, the homeowner's right several times by refusing to admit legitimate documents, proving their ownership, and proving the bank's
[01:48:56.960 --> 01:49:13.960]  right, and the judge denied the defendant the trial by jury at least three times when asked three times. The IRS, the FBI, and the Department of Justice have all told the defendant that they are victims of a major national banking fraud case that is well-known
[01:49:13.960 --> 01:49:26.960]  besides his operation home record. The FBI, IRS, Department of Justice all told the defendant, you have been scammed by a major copal stretching from California to Maine.
[01:49:26.960 --> 01:49:31.960]  Okay, okay, hold on, hold on. We all know that.
[01:49:31.960 --> 01:49:32.960]  Huh?
[01:49:32.960 --> 01:49:34.960]  We all know that.
[01:49:34.960 --> 01:49:36.960]  Okay, Joe.
[01:49:36.960 --> 01:49:41.960]  Did the homeowners file criminal charges against the judge?
[01:49:41.960 --> 01:49:57.960]  Not yet. I think they're afraid to because she's known as the mafioso judge, but the press has labeled her as that. They've had articles in the paper and magazines that label her as the mafioso judge.
[01:49:57.960 --> 01:50:04.960]  Well, as long as everybody's afraid to take any action against her, she can stay the mafioso judge.
[01:50:04.960 --> 01:50:16.960]  I understand, but the FBI is already looking into the case, and they haven't done anything for these, but they got 300 homeowners so far that has been scammed.
[01:50:16.960 --> 01:50:22.960]  That's all? What company is, what bank is this?
[01:50:22.960 --> 01:50:27.960]  This is Deutsche Bank, and it's at least 300, but there's more.
[01:50:27.960 --> 01:50:35.960]  Deutsche Bank, you're going to have thousands. If they're just saying 300, they've got some tiny little thing they're looking at.
[01:50:35.960 --> 01:50:37.960]  No, no, no, no, no.
[01:50:37.960 --> 01:50:42.960]  Tina, Tina from California.
[01:50:42.960 --> 01:50:52.960]  I think she's the one that the bank, Deutsche Bank said they had nothing to do with a particular trust.
[01:50:52.960 --> 01:50:58.960]  And then they foreclosed on Tina whose mortgage was in that trust.
[01:50:58.960 --> 01:51:01.960]  So they were subject to collateral stop-off.
[01:51:01.960 --> 01:51:04.960]  None of that stuff made any difference. They bought and paid for the judges.
[01:51:04.960 --> 01:51:17.960]  We need something more specific, and foreclosure is probably not the best way to move the politics we're after, because
[01:51:17.960 --> 01:51:26.960]  Trump was going to be heavily, if not invested with the banks, he is beholden to the banks.
[01:51:26.960 --> 01:51:29.960]  He does business with the banks.
[01:51:29.960 --> 01:51:30.960]  Of course he does.
[01:51:30.960 --> 01:51:35.960]  So it'd be hard for him to go after the banks. There are other ways we can get this done.
[01:51:35.960 --> 01:51:44.960]  If we're going to get Trump to move, we need him to get him to move on something that's politically expedient to him.
[01:51:44.960 --> 01:51:59.960]  And Democratic U.S. attorneys and Democratic judges that are thwarting his initiatives, we need him a way to get after those.
[01:51:59.960 --> 01:52:05.960]  Well, it's not just 300. The 300 is the one that they've actually prosecuted.
[01:52:05.960 --> 01:52:14.960]  There are thousands more that they're working on. That's why it's called Operation Home Records, and I'm going to investigation. They've only gotten 300 in jail.
[01:52:14.960 --> 01:52:22.960]  300 homes so far that they've been able to jail the people involved. There's a lot more.
[01:52:22.960 --> 01:52:25.960]  Wait a minute. There's actually been people jailed?
[01:52:25.960 --> 01:52:39.960]  Yeah, there's actually been people jailed. And if you look up the name Operation Home Records on the Internet, you'll see where the FBI and the IRS and the DOJ have made comments about it.
[01:52:39.960 --> 01:52:49.960]  It's a press release. And then the two people that I've got in mind, their name is right under there. It's right alongside that website.
[01:52:49.960 --> 01:52:56.960]  And they're mentioned. They're mentioned. And everybody knows that the FBI, that these two people are victims.
[01:52:56.960 --> 01:53:07.960]  And again, the number 300 is small, but there are hundreds and hundreds and thousands more that they're working on right now.
[01:53:07.960 --> 01:53:12.960]  It's odd that they're doing that at this time.
[01:53:12.960 --> 01:53:20.960]  That's politically important. The FBI is the political arm of the president.
[01:53:20.960 --> 01:53:26.960]  And they're not doing this without the approval of the president.
[01:53:26.960 --> 01:53:48.960]  So we are operating from a presumption that the president is not an enemy to the banks. But if he's allowing the FBI to crucify the banks, he must have some political agenda we don't know about.
[01:53:48.960 --> 01:54:01.960]  Well, this was before Trump. Trump kind of walked into this. This was going on long before. And a lot of people have already been, like I said, already been jailed.
[01:54:01.960 --> 01:54:15.960]  But the 300, don't let that number fool you. That number is just the one so far that they've been able, it's like a serial killer that kills people and they nail them on three murders.
[01:54:15.960 --> 01:54:20.960]  And there's a lot more that they're investigating.
[01:54:20.960 --> 01:54:32.960]  Yeah, what we were speaking to sounds just like Leslie. Bad grandma, she tried to pay off the mortgage and it wouldn't let her.
[01:54:32.960 --> 01:54:34.960]  Yeah, of course.
[01:54:34.960 --> 01:54:41.960]  Then they stopped taking payments and forced her into foreclosure. That's because they had sold the mortgage a number of times.
[01:54:41.960 --> 01:54:51.960]  Sure. And they had to get it to pay off. What I don't understand is where are the insurance companies in all of this?
[01:54:51.960 --> 01:55:03.960]  Why are the insurance companies not spearheading this because they're the ones that are getting screwed in the improper derivative sale?
[01:55:03.960 --> 01:55:12.960]  For example, AIG. That was a perfect example of how AIG got screwed. Yeah.
[01:55:12.960 --> 01:55:25.960]  So AIG is gone now. Who are these insurance companies who are paying these banks all this money? And why aren't they jumping up and down and railing in righteous indignation?
[01:55:25.960 --> 01:55:30.960]  Well, does this sound like something that you can approach Trump with?
[01:55:30.960 --> 01:55:44.960]  No. No. Way too politically charged from all sorts of different directions. I need something a lot simpler and a lot quieter.
[01:55:44.960 --> 01:55:46.960]  Oh, well.
[01:55:46.960 --> 01:55:58.960]  Okay. You got to understand, I've helped nearly 700 people file actions in foreclosure issues, so I'm not unfamiliar with these issues.
[01:55:58.960 --> 01:56:02.960]  Right, right. Oh, no, I know. I know there's a perfect one.
[01:56:02.960 --> 01:56:10.960]  I don't see this as something that politically would be valuable. It may be. Maybe I haven't looked at it right.
[01:56:10.960 --> 01:56:16.960]  Well, what I would do is I look up operation home records and see what you can see.
[01:56:16.960 --> 01:56:20.960]  I've got a note on that. I'll research that out.
[01:56:20.960 --> 01:56:28.960]  Okay, no, I just have one bad comment. Normally I don't, when it comes to medicine, this is what I do all the time.
[01:56:28.960 --> 01:56:33.960]  I'll talk to several doctors and some of them are Nobel Prize winners.
[01:56:33.960 --> 01:56:44.960]  And with law, I kind of stick to what you tell me. The other night I happened to call Eddie Craig and he blew, I didn't tell him where I got it from,
[01:56:44.960 --> 01:56:51.960]  and he said, traffic ticket charge in position on the trace because in order to allege the crime, you must allege all the elements of the crime.
[01:56:51.960 --> 01:56:55.960]  And if it's a traffic ticket, you've got to allege all the elements of the crime.
[01:56:55.960 --> 01:57:01.960]  And one of those elements would be whether or not the crime or violation arises from private or commercial operation.
[01:57:01.960 --> 01:57:11.960]  He proved that. And I don't, I'm not quite sure I understand, understand how he proved it, but he said that wasn't, that wasn't, that wasn't right.
[01:57:11.960 --> 01:57:16.960]  That there's more to it or something for the effect. Can you comment on this?
[01:57:16.960 --> 01:57:21.960]  No, because I don't know what he is, what he meant by more to it.
[01:57:21.960 --> 01:57:30.960]  Well, yeah, he didn't say it that way. I'm trying to paraphrase it. He told me something and I, and I still don't understand what it was told.
[01:57:30.960 --> 01:57:39.960]  So, but like I say, I do this with medicine all the time. I don't do it with law. And law is not my thing. So I can't even tell you how to paraphrase it.
[01:57:39.960 --> 01:57:44.960]  Okay. So if, if you don't know what he said, I certainly can't comment on what he said.
[01:57:44.960 --> 01:57:45.960]  Right.
[01:57:45.960 --> 01:57:49.960]  I can, I can poo poo Eddie though. I like to do that.
[01:57:49.960 --> 01:57:51.960]  But anyway, traffic ticket.
[01:57:51.960 --> 01:57:53.960]  Just for the, just for the heck of it.
[01:57:53.960 --> 01:57:54.960]  All right.
[01:57:54.960 --> 01:58:00.960]  This stuff that you told me, it holds water. This is real.
[01:58:00.960 --> 01:58:03.960]  Well, it's certainly a real claim you can make.
[01:58:03.960 --> 01:58:15.960]  This holds water. In other words, you could take this into a court and you can use it. And then when they say you're guilty, then you can take this to the next level.
[01:58:15.960 --> 01:58:19.960]  Absolutely. It goes to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:58:19.960 --> 01:58:22.960]  So that makes it a good nice claim to make.
[01:58:22.960 --> 01:58:26.960]  So this whole thing goes to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:58:26.960 --> 01:58:33.960]  Yeah, I don't see how they can get around it, but we'll have to check. You have to do this tomorrow night because we are out of time tonight.
[01:58:33.960 --> 01:58:35.960]  Okay.
[01:58:35.960 --> 01:58:38.960]  Tina, I'm sorry we did get back to you.
[01:58:38.960 --> 01:58:49.960]  We are out of time. We'll be back tomorrow night on our four hour info marathon. Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:49.960 --> 01:58:57.960]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament recovery version.
[01:58:57.960 --> 01:59:07.960]  The New Testament recovery version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:07.960 --> 01:59:19.960]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.960 --> 01:59:29.960]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.960 --> 01:59:40.960]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.960 --> 01:59:51.960]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.960 --> 01:59:59.960]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.