ROL_2019-08-19_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the low star lowdown.
[00:07.000 --> 00:13.320]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.320 --> 00:21.600]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.600 --> 00:29.920]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.920 --> 00:41.840]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.840 --> 00:52.680]  In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.680 --> 00:58.000]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[00:58.000 --> 01:05.000]  the 10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:05.000 --> 01:10.040]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing Hempon attacks
[01:10.040 --> 01:14.640]  his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, and San
[01:14.640 --> 01:19.080]  Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones
[01:19.080 --> 01:23.080]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:23.080 --> 01:24.960]  test the herb for THC.
[01:24.960 --> 01:28.680]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:28.680 --> 01:33.360]  she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.360 --> 01:34.360]  law.
[01:34.360 --> 01:37.840]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.840 --> 01:42.360]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.360 --> 01:48.520]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.520 --> 01:51.480]  well as other cities too like the District Attorney.
[01:51.480 --> 01:57.080]  In El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat, who also stated earlier this month that the law
[01:57.080 --> 02:02.000]  quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:02.000 --> 02:07.000]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:07.000 --> 02:11.000]  in Harris County, who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:11.000 --> 02:13.720]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.720 --> 02:17.600]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches with their
[02:17.600 --> 02:22.840]  charge with it.
[02:22.840 --> 02:27.480]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[02:27.480 --> 02:32.600]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.600 --> 02:38.240]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.240 --> 02:39.740]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.740 --> 02:44.040]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:44.040 --> 02:50.320]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.320 --> 03:17.260]  globe.
[03:20.320 --> 03:23.400]  on the cops, you get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[03:23.400 --> 03:25.880]  I'm gonna get the people being victimized by criminals.
[03:25.880 --> 03:26.880]  Hi folks, good evening.
[03:26.880 --> 03:30.920]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[03:30.920 --> 03:35.120]  It is the 19th of August, 2019.
[03:35.120 --> 03:38.200]  We are live tonight.
[03:38.200 --> 03:42.280]  Just an FYI, I've got the phones turned on, I don't have anything to talk about up front
[03:42.280 --> 03:48.520]  other than just to say I had a very good friend of mine passed away this past week and he
[03:48.520 --> 03:50.560]  is going to be sorely missed.
[03:50.560 --> 03:58.800]  Mr. Jack Lee and my condolences go out to his family, his wife Ramona, his daughter Jesse,
[03:58.800 --> 04:01.480]  Jamie and all the rest of his family.
[04:01.480 --> 04:07.040]  You are going to be sorely missed my friend and I greatly regret that I was not able to
[04:07.040 --> 04:12.320]  be there to see you one last time before you passed and I want you to know I'm thinking
[04:12.320 --> 04:18.000]  about you and so are all the people that knew you because you are a bright and shining light
[04:18.000 --> 04:21.920]  to all of us and I want to say I appreciate you.
[04:21.920 --> 04:30.160]  All right, that said the call in number to the show is 512-646-1984 if you want to call
[04:30.160 --> 04:35.120]  in and ask a question or tell us about something you've got coming up with a court case or
[04:35.120 --> 04:36.480]  whatever.
[04:36.480 --> 04:44.160]  Now one of the biggest problems that I have in doing what I do is having to deal with
[04:44.160 --> 04:48.660]  the naysayers and the statists, all those who think the state is always right and people
[04:48.660 --> 04:54.320]  like myself trying to teach you people what is true and what is false are always wrong
[04:54.320 --> 05:02.320]  especially if what we are saying goes against the grain of what the state wants you to believe.
[05:02.320 --> 05:09.160]  We have to deal with this every single day from multiple fronts and the whole purpose
[05:09.160 --> 05:13.440]  of putting the legal blog out there to begin with was to make it where I didn't have to
[05:13.440 --> 05:19.880]  constantly repeat myself and answer the same questions over and over and over again.
[05:19.880 --> 05:27.160]  Now I intentionally set that blog up so that I could screen comments just because of people
[05:27.160 --> 05:29.640]  like I'm talking about.
[05:29.640 --> 05:35.000]  They want to post all kinds of information trying to claim that what I'm telling you
[05:35.000 --> 05:41.040]  is false when in fact they're the ones that are using information that is irrelevant to
[05:41.040 --> 05:44.320]  the information I'm even discussing, why?
[05:44.320 --> 05:49.280]  Number one, it is not on point with the specific information I'm discussing.
[05:49.280 --> 05:55.560]  Number two, it does not address the specific law in the information that I am discussing.
[05:55.560 --> 06:01.600]  Number three, they don't understand the law because they haven't studied the actual law
[06:01.600 --> 06:03.040]  on the subject.
[06:03.040 --> 06:09.800]  Their entire argument is based upon court opinions that fail to address the specific
[06:09.800 --> 06:16.120]  facts of the argument I'm making, no yes, no ands, no buts.
[06:16.120 --> 06:24.360]  It's just as bad as that the constitutional challenge motion to SB 971.
[06:24.360 --> 06:32.920]  In the entire time that that motion has existed, I don't know of any case where it's been filed
[06:32.920 --> 06:37.920]  that has gotten passed at the motions hearing stage, but then again that's because people
[06:37.920 --> 06:43.480]  that buy the material and use the information don't always tell me what's going on in their
[06:43.480 --> 06:45.720]  case from beginning to end.
[06:45.720 --> 06:47.840]  Some do, some don't.
[06:47.840 --> 06:48.840]  Most don't.
[06:48.840 --> 06:51.680]  Now I don't know if it's because they win, lose or draw.
[06:51.680 --> 06:53.960]  I don't know if it's because they give up.
[06:53.960 --> 06:57.680]  Though I know some have, I don't know.
[06:57.680 --> 07:01.880]  So I have no way of answering the question, well just how good is your information?
[07:01.880 --> 07:03.200]  How successful is it?
[07:03.200 --> 07:07.360]  I couldn't answer that question if I wanted to.
[07:07.360 --> 07:13.240]  Because I don't have the necessary feedback from the people that get it and are using
[07:13.240 --> 07:14.240]  it.
[07:14.240 --> 07:18.480]  Now I know it has worked and I've been told as much and I've put every time I've been
[07:18.480 --> 07:23.720]  given permission to do so, I have posted an article on the blog talking about the case
[07:23.720 --> 07:29.360]  and posting any relevant documents to that case, including any signed court orders dismissing
[07:29.360 --> 07:35.080]  it or ruling in favor of the accused, whatever the outcome is, we put it up there.
[07:35.080 --> 07:38.280]  If it's given to us, the permission is granted to post it with the people's information
[07:38.280 --> 07:40.560]  intact.
[07:40.560 --> 07:46.720]  Now that said, I can't guarantee anyone anything because the people you're dealing with are
[07:46.720 --> 07:49.040]  themselves people.
[07:49.040 --> 07:53.680]  They're idiots also, unfortunately far more often than not.
[07:53.680 --> 07:57.840]  They don't care what the law says, they only care about that paycheck they get for doing
[07:57.840 --> 08:04.600]  what the law has told them to do as far as they understand what the law is.
[08:04.600 --> 08:11.840]  And the law is any higher judge, any county commissioner, any prosecuting attorney can
[08:11.840 --> 08:17.920]  tell any lower court judge the outcome they want and that judge has no option other than
[08:17.920 --> 08:23.880]  to deliver it unless for some reason they have a personal dislike of the prosecutor.
[08:23.880 --> 08:26.520]  That is exactly what they usually do.
[08:26.520 --> 08:32.760]  There is no way you can go into a court and get a fair trial from a judge who is taking
[08:32.760 --> 08:38.400]  their cues on what to do from the person who is attempting to prosecute you in that same
[08:38.400 --> 08:40.200]  court.
[08:40.200 --> 08:45.960]  When the judge in your case is following the instructions of the prosecuting attorney in
[08:45.960 --> 08:51.680]  the case, you are not being given a fair and impartial trial.
[08:51.680 --> 08:57.320]  When you file written motions in a court and a court denies those motions without any form
[08:57.320 --> 09:02.360]  of response from the opposing counsel other than a verbal, I'll judge these motions are
[09:02.360 --> 09:08.720]  frivolous but provides no substantive facts or legal basis of any kind for why they are
[09:08.720 --> 09:10.880]  attempting to make that claim.
[09:10.880 --> 09:17.480]  You are not getting a fair trial.
[09:17.480 --> 09:23.200]  And nine times out of ten, that is exactly what the case will be.
[09:23.200 --> 09:28.280]  You are not getting a fair trial.
[09:28.280 --> 09:35.920]  The problem is how do you know if you are or if you aren't?
[09:35.920 --> 09:40.600]  And the answer to that remains the same as it has ever since I've gotten on this show
[09:40.600 --> 09:43.160]  as a co-host.
[09:43.160 --> 09:45.640]  You have to know the law.
[09:45.640 --> 09:52.280]  You have to know the rules of procedure because only then can you readily identify when and
[09:52.280 --> 09:59.200]  where the court and prosecuting attorney are attempting to subvert it or deviate from it
[09:59.200 --> 10:07.200]  in a way that harms your right to a fair and impartial trial and to due process in general.
[10:07.200 --> 10:11.600]  When you do not know the rules of the game and you are playing with someone who is intimately
[10:11.600 --> 10:20.120]  familiar with those rules, then what chance do you stand when the only way to know how
[10:20.120 --> 10:23.400]  to play the game is them telling you, well, you can't do that.
[10:23.400 --> 10:28.440]  You have to do it this way and in this set of circumstances it goes like this and it
[10:28.440 --> 10:36.480]  goes like that and they don't have to be telling you the truth and they usually aren't.
[10:36.480 --> 10:40.680]  And if they are telling you the truth, then guaranteed what they are really doing if you
[10:40.680 --> 10:44.760]  know what they are saying and why they are saying it and what the law says about it,
[10:44.760 --> 10:50.840]  what they are really doing is attempting to commit fraud because they are lying to you
[10:50.840 --> 10:52.600]  about what the law is.
[10:52.600 --> 10:56.440]  They are lying to you about the conditions and circumstances and the evidence involved
[10:56.440 --> 11:01.200]  and they are lying to you about the process in general so as to make it where you stumble
[11:01.200 --> 11:05.360]  and they win.
[11:05.360 --> 11:11.320]  The worst mistake you can make is ask your opponent, how would you fight you if you
[11:11.320 --> 11:14.400]  were me?
[11:14.400 --> 11:19.500]  In some boxer getting in the ring with Mike Tyson and asking Mike's advice on how to
[11:19.500 --> 11:24.000]  beat him as the other boxer.
[11:24.000 --> 11:25.000]  What's Mike going to say?
[11:25.000 --> 11:28.280]  Well, the best way to beat me is to just wear me out.
[11:28.280 --> 11:35.800]  You can do this easiest by staying there and let me just swing at your head until I drop.
[11:35.800 --> 11:42.120]  That's his advice and because he is the experienced boxer, go ahead and take it.
[11:42.120 --> 11:43.640]  He must know what he is talking about.
[11:43.640 --> 11:48.240]  Sure, I can stand there and let Mike Tyson punch me in the head until he falls down exhausted
[11:48.240 --> 11:54.360]  and then I can get declared the winner, that's how it works, sure.
[11:54.360 --> 11:59.400]  But that is what you are doing when you go into these courtrooms unprepared.
[11:59.400 --> 12:02.360]  That is what you do when you go into these courtrooms and you are sitting in front of
[12:02.360 --> 12:07.600]  a judge who is being led around by the nose by the very person trying to take your money,
[12:07.600 --> 12:12.000]  throw you in jail or whatever else it is they may be trying to accomplish by prosecuting
[12:12.000 --> 12:16.220]  you in this case.
[12:16.220 --> 12:20.880]  There is nothing just about the justice system.
[12:20.880 --> 12:27.760]  It is completely unjust and it is that way by design.
[12:27.760 --> 12:34.960]  And because it is by design, that means there is a plan.
[12:34.960 --> 12:40.680]  That means there is a purpose for everything it does.
[12:40.680 --> 12:46.080]  Now it does not have to be some conspiratorial nefarious purpose to screw you over.
[12:46.080 --> 12:47.080]  Believe me, it does.
[12:47.080 --> 12:48.880]  It can be very straightforward.
[12:48.880 --> 12:53.800]  You have X days to file these particular types of pleadings or those pleadings may not be
[12:53.800 --> 12:58.520]  filed beyond the expiration date of this many days without specific approval by the judge
[12:58.520 --> 13:00.640]  of the court.
[13:00.640 --> 13:03.680]  And the judge can either give it or not give it.
[13:03.680 --> 13:08.280]  And then there is other rules that say and if you go beyond a second deadline, then even
[13:08.280 --> 13:11.320]  the judge can't overrule it in your screw.
[13:11.320 --> 13:15.160]  It is by design.
[13:15.160 --> 13:20.600]  The more familiar you are with the design, the better you understand its form and function.
[13:20.600 --> 13:23.520]  You understand how things flow around it.
[13:23.520 --> 13:30.680]  It's like an aerodynamic engineer trying to understand how to streamline a car or an airplane
[13:30.680 --> 13:32.120]  in a wind tunnel.
[13:32.120 --> 13:37.280]  They have to study the airflow pattern over the surface of the object to understand how
[13:37.280 --> 13:43.640]  to make it the most efficient shape possible.
[13:43.640 --> 13:49.920]  It consumes less fuel, takes less power to fly, has better lift, etc., etc., etc.
[13:49.920 --> 13:55.720]  All the things they're trying to figure out just by watching how things flow around the
[13:55.720 --> 13:56.720]  object.
[13:56.720 --> 14:00.560]  Well, that is what legal procedure is.
[14:00.560 --> 14:06.040]  It is the object around which everything in the process flows.
[14:06.040 --> 14:14.080]  It is what determines how that object is tailored to accommodate that flow.
[14:14.080 --> 14:17.320]  It's not the other way around.
[14:17.320 --> 14:22.960]  The sooner you understand that, the better off you're going to be.
[14:22.960 --> 14:27.680]  The more effort you put into understanding that, the better you're going to be at interpreting
[14:27.680 --> 14:35.360]  the results of what you're seeing and how to improve them.
[14:35.360 --> 14:41.280]  But when you choose to take the easy way out by one, doing nothing, two, coming up with
[14:41.280 --> 14:45.320]  cockamamie theories that you can't substantiate and making arguments you can't support with
[14:45.320 --> 14:53.000]  actual facts and evidence or eyewitness testimony, three, you just make stuff up, and four, you
[14:53.000 --> 14:56.360]  just don't fight at all and you just pay it and go away.
[14:56.360 --> 15:00.640]  These are all things they count on in one form or another, but as long as you're doing
[15:00.640 --> 15:08.400]  these things, they win, you lose, the money flows, and that's all that matters to them.
[15:08.400 --> 15:17.240]  I came on this show not to be an expert, not to be the go-to guy, not to be the know-it-all.
[15:17.240 --> 15:25.480]  I came here to share my understanding of what I saw and what I learned from what I saw and
[15:25.480 --> 15:33.840]  how to verify that what I was seeing and learning about what I was seeing was actually accurate.
[15:33.840 --> 15:39.400]  Then I tried to convey that information to you, as most of us here on this network do.
[15:39.400 --> 15:44.920]  If we learn about something like this, we want to inform you of it so that you understand
[15:44.920 --> 15:45.920]  it too.
[15:45.920 --> 15:47.000]  Why?
[15:47.000 --> 15:53.120]  Because by making you prepared, we are helping ourselves.
[15:53.120 --> 15:54.120]  Why?
[15:54.120 --> 15:57.680]  Because you may be one of those people on our jury one day.
[15:57.680 --> 16:02.520]  By having prepared you in advance with knowledge you would not have had without us and that
[16:02.520 --> 16:07.160]  gives you an understanding and an insight that you otherwise would not have, you may
[16:07.160 --> 16:10.480]  look at what's going on and say, this isn't right.
[16:10.480 --> 16:18.080]  I can't let the state do what it's doing here against this guy and vice versa.
[16:18.080 --> 16:23.920]  I can't let somebody who is obviously guilty because of the facts and evidence walk free
[16:23.920 --> 16:29.560]  if the process was followed, but if they intentionally broke the process just so they
[16:29.560 --> 16:34.160]  could get the guy, I got a problem with that.
[16:34.160 --> 16:39.240]  These are things you need to know to even serve on a jury and be useful to anyone but
[16:39.240 --> 16:40.320]  the state.
[16:40.320 --> 16:46.320]  The state prefers you to be deaf, dumb and blind except for the stuff they're sticking
[16:46.320 --> 16:52.000]  in your vein and pumping you full of so they get the outcome they want.
[16:52.000 --> 16:55.280]  We're here to make sure that's not how it gets done.
[16:55.280 --> 16:59.000]  Y'all hang on and we'll be right back after this break.
[16:59.000 --> 17:04.720]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[17:04.720 --> 17:08.160]  In today's America we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[17:08.160 --> 17:12.280]  going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[17:12.280 --> 17:15.560]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[17:15.560 --> 17:19.600]  in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law.
[17:19.600 --> 17:23.600]  The courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our
[17:23.600 --> 17:25.320]  rights through due process.
[17:25.320 --> 17:28.800]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the
[17:28.800 --> 17:32.560]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[17:32.560 --> 17:34.640]  is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[17:34.640 --> 17:38.960]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[17:38.960 --> 17:39.960]  ordering your copy today.
[17:39.960 --> 17:43.640]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code,
[17:43.640 --> 17:48.080]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[17:48.080 --> 17:50.080]  documents and other useful resource material.
[17:50.080 --> 17:54.320]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[17:54.320 --> 18:00.960]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:00.960 --> 18:06.280]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:06.280 --> 18:09.760]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:09.760 --> 18:14.080]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:14.080 --> 18:15.080]  can win too.
[18:15.080 --> 18:19.920]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.920 --> 18:25.680]  civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.680 --> 18:30.320]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:30.320 --> 18:34.520]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.520 --> 18:39.640]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.640 --> 18:41.760]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.760 --> 18:47.320]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:47.320 --> 18:50.280]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.280 --> 18:58.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:58.000 --> 19:15.880]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now, use your listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:15.880 --> 19:30.160]  to learn the music.
[19:30.160 --> 19:32.660]  When I'm through the twilight, it's a home
[19:32.660 --> 19:36.660]  The head is in my house, feet is my keystone
[19:36.660 --> 19:40.660]  My feet have been moved under the moon and star
[19:40.660 --> 19:44.660]  Perfecto, now that I've fallen too far
[19:44.660 --> 19:46.660]  You will come and go
[19:47.660 --> 19:49.660]  From the bottom, head to the bottom
[19:52.660 --> 19:54.660]  You will come and go
[19:54.660 --> 20:00.660]  From the bottom, head to the bottom
[20:03.660 --> 20:06.660]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[20:06.660 --> 20:10.660]  The call in number is 512-646-1984
[20:10.660 --> 20:14.660]  If you want to call and ask a question, talk about a case, whatever.
[20:14.660 --> 20:17.660]  In the meantime, I shall keep going.
[20:17.660 --> 20:27.660]  Okay, now, because of the amount of information surrounding all the things that we deal with on this show and in these types of cases in general,
[20:27.660 --> 20:31.660]  it's not something that you're just going to pick up overnight and become an expert at.
[20:31.660 --> 20:35.660]  That's not how this works, not for anybody.
[20:35.660 --> 20:41.660]  That doesn't work any better for somebody going to law school, even if they have an aptitude for it.
[20:41.660 --> 20:47.660]  It's not going to be like the Doctor Strange movie where he picks up the mystic arts virtually overnight.
[20:47.660 --> 20:49.660]  It just doesn't work that way.
[20:49.660 --> 21:07.660]  Okay, so it takes a lot of time, a lot of study, a lot of mental effort to think outside of the box that the legal industry tries very, very hard to shoehorn your mind into.
[21:07.660 --> 21:19.660]  They don't want you to look at things outside of the box they create, because when you do, that's when you force the courts to consider things they haven't bothered to look at before,
[21:19.660 --> 21:24.660]  or to reconsider things they have looked at and decided incorrectly.
[21:24.660 --> 21:28.660]  Things like qualified immunity, for example.
[21:28.660 --> 21:45.660]  Now, folks, if you want to know what kind of system of government you have in America, all you have to do is read what history tells us we have, right?
[21:45.660 --> 21:48.660]  I mean, we have a constitutional republic in America.
[21:48.660 --> 21:52.660]  That's what we have, right?
[21:52.660 --> 22:00.660]  I think you better check that idea at the door, and I will tell you why.
[22:00.660 --> 22:17.660]  Admittedly, by the courts themselves and every prosecuting attorney and every rights advocacy group on the planet, there is absolutely no law or constitutional clause of any kind
[22:17.660 --> 22:32.660]  that provides a public official of any category with any form of immunity from accountability for their actions while acting in their official capacity.
[22:32.660 --> 22:44.660]  In fact, the only law relative to that that does exist are, at the federal level, the Ku Klux Klan Act, which is Title 18 of the United States Code.
[22:44.660 --> 22:51.660]  And at the state level, you have laws like official oppression, abuse of official capacity, and official misconduct.
[22:51.660 --> 23:00.660]  Then you have the myriad actual crimes that everybody can get charged with, whether public official or private individual.
[23:00.660 --> 23:14.660]  Now, just like those public official crimes of official oppression and abuse of official capacity, the non-official persons such as myself and most of you out there cannot get charged with those crimes
[23:14.660 --> 23:22.660]  because we have no official capacity under which to act in which to cover the necessary elements of the offense.
[23:22.660 --> 23:32.660]  Same thing applies with any kind of official regulatory law.
[23:32.660 --> 23:43.660]  The Constitution does not authorize private individuals or it doesn't cover the violation of rights by private individuals.
[23:43.660 --> 23:48.660]  It only covers violations of rights by government actors.
[23:48.660 --> 23:58.660]  Why? Because the Constitution is written to regulate and govern the government, not the people.
[23:58.660 --> 24:11.660]  So the people can't violate a constitutionally protected right in such a way that you have a constitutionally protected cause of action against a private individual.
[24:11.660 --> 24:14.660]  You have a civil cause of action against a private individual.
[24:14.660 --> 24:18.660]  You can certainly sue them not saying you have no remedy.
[24:18.660 --> 24:29.660]  I'm simply saying that your remedy is not counts in constitutional protection principles like it is when the oppressor is an official actor.
[24:29.660 --> 24:48.660]  That's important to understand because there are so many people out there that want to make these arguments about how they're going to sue people for violation of rights and blah, blah, blah, people cannot violate your rights without an official capacity in which to violate them from.
[24:48.660 --> 24:56.660]  Okay? Not from the perspective of an actual right under constitutional protection.
[24:56.660 --> 25:09.660]  Again, that's not saying that you don't have a remedy or a right to that remedy, but the right, the remedy is not sought by constitutional means and violations.
[25:09.660 --> 25:12.660]  Okay? So understand that distinction.
[25:12.660 --> 25:25.660]  One of the things I'm working on right now to go hand in hand with the new seminar material is a new presentation, a PowerPoint presentation, which I'm going to turn into a video when I get it all done.
[25:25.660 --> 25:39.660]  But it goes into trying to explain something relative to rights violations when it comes to the transportation code and similar laws that are regulatory in nature and remedial in nature.
[25:39.660 --> 25:41.660]  Now, what is a remedial law?
[25:41.660 --> 26:10.660]  Okay? If you look at its history, what a remedial law is and what its intended purpose is, is to provide a set of standards by which a harm can be proven in order to provide someone who was harmed by the actor and their actions under those standards a way to sue and recover.
[26:10.660 --> 26:12.660]  That's what remedial law is.
[26:12.660 --> 26:16.660]  It is a law providing remedy.
[26:16.660 --> 26:20.660]  Okay? That's what the transportation code is, folks.
[26:20.660 --> 26:29.660]  That's what it was originally created as, a remedial law, not a regulatory law, a remedial law.
[26:29.660 --> 26:31.660]  How does that work?
[26:31.660 --> 26:43.660]  Well, let me see if I can explain it to you simple enough here that everybody can get it, even those who actually work in government, which is very low threshold, but let's see what I can do with it.
[26:43.660 --> 26:48.660]  Okay.
[26:48.660 --> 27:02.660]  The remedial law was intended to cover those who engage in particular business professions or occupations involving the use of the land transportation, which is normally the highways and the railways.
[27:02.660 --> 27:05.660]  Okay?
[27:05.660 --> 27:15.660]  That interact with either publicly owned property or with the public in a manner that could be detrimental to the public as a whole.
[27:15.660 --> 27:19.660]  Okay? Examples.
[27:19.660 --> 27:24.660]  Trucking companies that fail to maintain their trucks in safe operational condition.
[27:24.660 --> 27:29.660]  The truck trailer snaps in half, kills 14 people in a big polyp on the interstate.
[27:29.660 --> 27:33.660]  The brakes fail because they weren't maintained properly.
[27:33.660 --> 27:37.660]  The air compression fails so the brakes go out because it wasn't maintained properly.
[27:37.660 --> 27:44.660]  The driver wasn't properly trained, so he ran over a bunch of people at an intersection because he didn't know how to stop his truck.
[27:44.660 --> 27:57.660]  The train driver failed to blow his horn as approaching a crossing where cars at a side of a city limit cross and park and stop and all that, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[27:57.660 --> 28:07.660]  These are all ground based forms of business that interact with the public in a potentially detrimental fashion if certain rules and regulations are not followed.
[28:07.660 --> 28:11.660]  That's what the transportation code was intended to do.
[28:11.660 --> 28:33.660]  Provide the guidelines so that if an injury occurred under one of these land based transportation schemes that the standards existed by which to measure the level of neglect or wrongdoing so that the person injured or who suffered a loss through property or other means
[28:33.660 --> 28:45.660]  was able to make a case and point to specific facts and circumstances that allowed them to sue with evidence and remedy.
[28:45.660 --> 28:48.660]  That's what it was all about, okay?
[28:48.660 --> 29:14.660]  So because of those standards, we know that if, in a speeding case for instance, since one of the requirements to actually be charged with speeding in the state of Texas is that you failed to control your speed to such a degree that you had a collision with another person or vehicle that was already lawfully upon or entering the highway, okay?
[29:14.660 --> 29:36.660]  That right there is the set of standards and circumstances under which that collision and its resulting injury, whether it be property damage, physical injury, death, dismemberment, whatever, could be put in front of a court with supporting testimony and evidence
[29:36.660 --> 29:49.660]  and thus allow the person harmed to seek remedy against the person who caused the collision in the first place by failing to control their speed and their conveyance properly, whatever it may have been, okay?
[29:49.660 --> 29:51.660]  That's how it was supposed to work.
[29:51.660 --> 29:54.660]  That is, in fact, how it should still be working.
[29:54.660 --> 30:03.660]  Y'all hang on and we'll pick this up on the other side.
[30:03.660 --> 30:08.660]  People ate at McDonald's because it's a lot cheaper than a wholesome meal at home, but is it really?
[30:08.660 --> 30:35.660]  I'll get your Catherine Albrecht and I'll set the record straight on which hits your wallet harder next.
[30:38.660 --> 30:43.660]  Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Start Page.
[30:43.660 --> 30:46.660]  Why are Americans overweight?
[30:46.660 --> 30:51.660]  We're often told it's because fattening junk food is the only thing low-income families can afford.
[30:51.660 --> 30:53.660]  But let's set the record straight.
[30:53.660 --> 30:57.660]  Processed food is actually way more expensive than food cooked at home.
[30:57.660 --> 31:01.660]  Example, feeding a family of four at Mickey D's costs about 30 bucks.
[31:01.660 --> 31:06.660]  At home, a roasted chicken with potatoes and a salad costs less than half that.
[31:06.660 --> 31:10.660]  It's a lot healthier. Truth is, most people are able to afford real food.
[31:10.660 --> 31:14.660]  It's the cooking we don't like because we view it as backbreaking work.
[31:14.660 --> 31:21.660]  We need to start appreciating the pleasures of a warm, savory kitchen and the closeness that comes from nourishing our families.
[31:21.660 --> 31:30.660]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.660 --> 31:35.660]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:35.660 --> 31:37.660]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:37.660 --> 31:42.660]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:42.660 --> 31:45.660]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:45.660 --> 31:48.660]  And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[31:48.660 --> 31:49.660]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:49.660 --> 31:50.660]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:50.660 --> 31:52.660]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:52.660 --> 31:53.660]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.660 --> 31:54.660]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:54.660 --> 31:57.660]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.660 --> 32:00.660]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:00.660 --> 32:02.660]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[32:02.660 --> 32:05.660]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[32:05.660 --> 32:08.660]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails.
[32:08.660 --> 32:10.660]  But good luck getting them to pay for it.
[32:10.660 --> 32:12.660]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails.
[32:12.660 --> 32:13.660]  But I'm serious about your roof.
[32:13.660 --> 32:15.660]  That's why you have insurance.
[32:15.660 --> 32:20.660]  And Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[32:20.660 --> 32:26.660]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[32:26.660 --> 32:31.660]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[32:31.660 --> 32:38.660]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:38.660 --> 32:40.660]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off.
[32:40.660 --> 32:45.660]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[32:45.660 --> 32:50.660]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[32:50.660 --> 32:56.660]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:56.660 --> 32:58.660]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[32:58.660 --> 33:01.660]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[33:28.660 --> 33:48.660]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:48.660 --> 33:52.660]  The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[33:52.660 --> 33:55.660]  If you want to call and ask a question, talk about a case.
[33:55.660 --> 33:59.660]  Or just generally address anything I'm talking about so far.
[33:59.660 --> 34:03.660]  Alright, onward and upward.
[34:03.660 --> 34:10.660]  Now when we get into the issue of having to learn the stuff that we've learned here
[34:10.660 --> 34:13.660]  and all the study and everything involved and we try to bring that to you,
[34:13.660 --> 34:16.660]  we try to do it in a manner to make it easy to understand.
[34:16.660 --> 34:22.660]  But there are still those people out there including those in the actual legal profession that can't see the forest for the trees
[34:22.660 --> 34:29.660]  or because they choose to remain woefully ignorant and turn a blind eye to what's actually going on.
[34:29.660 --> 34:35.660]  Now a good example of that is when I spent time down here at the Texas Capitol
[34:35.660 --> 34:41.660]  going in and visiting with the legislators, their lead counsel, and so on and so forth.
[34:41.660 --> 34:46.660]  And bringing up these specific issues and matters of law to each of them,
[34:46.660 --> 34:52.660]  providing them with the information and writing just to have every one of them completely ignore it.
[34:52.660 --> 34:56.660]  Do absolutely nothing about it and continue on with the status quo
[34:56.660 --> 35:00.660]  as if they're the only ones that can possibly understand what's going on.
[35:00.660 --> 35:08.660]  Now I don't know about you but that mindset royally pisses me off.
[35:08.660 --> 35:11.660]  I'm not a stupid guy by any means.
[35:11.660 --> 35:15.660]  I don't consider myself to be the smartest guy in any room
[35:15.660 --> 35:20.660]  but there are areas where I'm experienced enough that my opinion matters,
[35:20.660 --> 35:30.660]  that the information I have matters and I'm not going to not provide it just because you don't want to hear it.
[35:30.660 --> 35:33.660]  The fact of the matter is if I know you're doing something wrong
[35:33.660 --> 35:37.660]  and I know that you should realize that you're doing something wrong
[35:37.660 --> 35:40.660]  and I bring it to your attention that you're doing it wrong
[35:40.660 --> 35:49.660]  and you refuse to comply with what the actual rules are that say that you're doing it wrong,
[35:49.660 --> 35:52.660]  then you're the one that's acting criminally.
[35:52.660 --> 35:56.660]  You're the one that's in violation of everything the law talks about
[35:56.660 --> 36:02.660]  when it comes up with the entire idea of the rule of law.
[36:02.660 --> 36:16.660]  And when those responsible for creating the law or enforcing the law or prosecuting the law refuse to recognize and abide by the law,
[36:16.660 --> 36:21.660]  then you have come full circle back to where this discussion began.
[36:21.660 --> 36:27.660]  What kind of government system do you actually have?
[36:27.660 --> 36:33.660]  Because that is not a constitutional republic.
[36:33.660 --> 36:39.660]  It's very easy to prove that we don't live in a constitutional republic.
[36:39.660 --> 36:43.660]  All you have to do is look at the court opinions, okay?
[36:43.660 --> 36:51.660]  We now live in an oligarchy form of government and that too is very easy to prove.
[36:51.660 --> 37:02.660]  The attorneys and the courts have placed themselves at the top tier of government over everyone else.
[37:02.660 --> 37:08.660]  If the legislature passes a law, the courts ignore it and rewrite it to however they want it to work
[37:08.660 --> 37:12.660]  and however they want it to read by simply writing an opinion that does so.
[37:12.660 --> 37:14.660]  How do we know this?
[37:14.660 --> 37:17.660]  Again, all we have to do is look at the court opinions themselves.
[37:17.660 --> 37:34.660]  Did you know that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals literally wrote an opinion that says it is perfectly fine for prosecutors and courts
[37:34.660 --> 37:43.660]  to convict you of an offense using terminology that has nothing to do with the offense?
[37:43.660 --> 37:51.660]  They wrote an opinion that said they can use similar words and phrases to those that are contained in the law
[37:51.660 --> 37:59.660]  in order to state the offense and to prove the offense and to get the conviction.
[37:59.660 --> 38:01.660]  Now, why do I bring that up?
[38:01.660 --> 38:06.660]  Because it goes hand in hand with this presentation I'm attempting to create.
[38:06.660 --> 38:09.660]  And it works like this, okay?
[38:09.660 --> 38:17.660]  Imagine if you will that you've got a box, a bubble, a circle, a cage.
[38:17.660 --> 38:27.660]  I don't care how you want to imagine the container, but imagine a container of some kind, okay?
[38:27.660 --> 38:32.660]  And realize that this container is 3D.
[38:32.660 --> 38:36.660]  It's got an inside, it's got an outside.
[38:36.660 --> 38:43.660]  And even if it's just a simple circular, square, rectangular fence, I don't care.
[38:43.660 --> 38:51.660]  Just understand that there are only certain things that you can put inside of this container.
[38:51.660 --> 39:00.660]  And then everything else that is not allowed to go into the container must remain outside of that container.
[39:00.660 --> 39:07.660]  They can never be put inside, only the things that belong in this container can go into this container.
[39:07.660 --> 39:13.660]  So how do we determine what belongs in this container, okay?
[39:13.660 --> 39:16.660]  We have rules for that too.
[39:16.660 --> 39:23.660]  The Texas Constitution once again specifically says that all legislative bills can only contain one subject.
[39:23.660 --> 39:30.660]  So for our purposes of illustration, the bill is the container.
[39:30.660 --> 39:34.660]  But the bill is a representative container.
[39:34.660 --> 39:44.660]  It is a physical representation of an otherwise imaginary container of some kind.
[39:44.660 --> 39:56.660]  In the case of SB 971, which is the legislative bill that created the current recodification of the transportation code in 1995,
[39:56.660 --> 40:06.660]  it is the physical representative container for the legal subject matter of transportation, okay?
[40:06.660 --> 40:19.660]  So the bill is the bubble, the box, the bucket, the fence, whatever you want to call it, for the subject of transportation.
[40:19.660 --> 40:27.660]  And you can only put items into that container that have to do with transportation.
[40:27.660 --> 40:32.660]  You can't put anything else in there, okay?
[40:32.660 --> 40:42.660]  Because the constitutional clause that requires every bill to contain only one subject specifically prohibits the mixing of subjects within a single bill.
[40:42.660 --> 40:48.660]  It specifically says one subject, one subject only.
[40:48.660 --> 41:04.660]  So that means that everything that you put into the container has to be an object that specifically relates to the subject matter itself, i.e. the container itself, okay?
[41:04.660 --> 41:18.660]  Now, the only way that something that would normally have to remain outside of that container can get into that container is to basically go through a legal transformation.
[41:18.660 --> 41:24.660]  Now, an example that would be outside the container, we have an automobile.
[41:24.660 --> 41:31.660]  Inside the container, we have a vehicle, a motor vehicle, or a commercial motor vehicle, okay?
[41:31.660 --> 41:35.660]  We have a truck, we have a light truck, we have a passenger car.
[41:35.660 --> 41:44.660]  All those are inside the container relative to transportation, but outside we have an automobile.
[41:44.660 --> 41:49.660]  Now, the courts have ruled that an automobile is a motor vehicle.
[41:49.660 --> 41:50.660]  That is not true.
[41:50.660 --> 41:52.660]  It cannot possibly be true.
[41:52.660 --> 41:53.660]  Why?
[41:53.660 --> 42:01.660]  Because the law, at least in Texas, does not define an automobile in relation to transportation at all.
[42:01.660 --> 42:09.660]  An automobile is not defined by any part of the Texas transportation code as being something relative to transportation.
[42:09.660 --> 42:13.660]  Nowhere, no way at all.
[42:13.660 --> 42:37.660]  The only thing that is are vehicles, motor vehicles, commercial motor vehicles, and devices that are used for the transportation of persons or property or can be drawn upon the highway while transporting persons or property as a vehicle, okay?
[42:37.660 --> 42:39.660]  That's what it is.
[42:39.660 --> 42:50.660]  So in order for that automobile to become a vehicle, motor vehicle, or commercial motor vehicle, it has to undergo a legal transformation.
[42:50.660 --> 43:05.660]  It must somehow go from outside of the container and pass through a metamorphosis stage that will now allow it to become a vehicle, motor vehicle, or commercial motor vehicle within the container.
[43:05.660 --> 43:07.660]  How does that happen?
[43:07.660 --> 43:09.660]  It happens the same way.
[43:09.660 --> 43:15.660]  It has always happened by its use, okay?
[43:15.660 --> 43:21.660]  The use in this particular case is use for the purpose of transportation.
[43:21.660 --> 43:22.660]  How do we know?
[43:22.660 --> 43:26.660]  Because the subject matter itself is transportation.
[43:26.660 --> 43:29.660]  Transportation is not a thing.
[43:29.660 --> 43:31.660]  It is an action.
[43:31.660 --> 43:33.660]  It is an act.
[43:33.660 --> 43:46.660]  It is something to be done by persons through using some sort of device such as a vehicle, motor vehicle, or commercial motor vehicle, right?
[43:46.660 --> 43:52.660]  They have to be using it for the purpose of transportation to transform it into one of those legal categories.
[43:52.660 --> 44:00.660]  Y'all hang on just a minute and we will be right back and finish this up.
[44:00.660 --> 44:03.660]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.660 --> 44:14.660]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:14.660 --> 44:18.660]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.660 --> 44:22.660]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.660 --> 44:27.660]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[44:27.660 --> 44:33.660]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:33.660 --> 44:42.660]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.660 --> 44:51.660]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.660 --> 45:01.660]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.660 --> 45:09.660]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[45:09.660 --> 45:15.660]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[45:15.660 --> 45:19.660]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[45:19.660 --> 45:25.660]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers and journalists.
[45:25.660 --> 45:28.660]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[45:28.660 --> 45:33.660]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[45:33.660 --> 45:40.660]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[45:40.660 --> 45:44.660]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept bitcoins as payment.
[45:44.660 --> 45:52.660]  Call us at 512-646-644-0. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[45:52.660 --> 45:55.660]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10-6, Saturdays, 10-2.
[45:55.660 --> 46:15.660]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[46:26.660 --> 46:37.660]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[46:37.660 --> 46:40.660]  Alright, back to where we were here.
[46:40.660 --> 46:54.660]  Okay, now because this transformation has to take place in order for an automobile to become a device that would constitute a vehicle, motor vehicle, or commercial motor vehicle,
[46:54.660 --> 47:06.660]  the courts attempting to say that you can use automobile to prosecute the same offense where the element says vehicle, motor vehicle, or commercial motor vehicle is absolutely asinine.
[47:06.660 --> 47:11.660]  That is the court legislating from the bench.
[47:11.660 --> 47:21.660]  They are rewriting the law to suit the means and outcome they want, not the one required by the law.
[47:21.660 --> 47:27.660]  An automobile has nothing to do with transportation.
[47:27.660 --> 47:37.660]  If it did, it would be defined in the transportation code as being one of those devices that is being regulated, but it's not.
[47:37.660 --> 47:39.660]  Why?
[47:39.660 --> 48:01.660]  Because it must be a motor vehicle or a vehicle or a commercial motor vehicle in order to be applicable, and it can only become one of those things when its use is itself related to the act of transportation.
[48:01.660 --> 48:10.660]  Okay, transportation just doesn't simply mean moving or going from one place to another.
[48:10.660 --> 48:28.660]  Okay, not in and of itself in relation to regulatory requirements where you have to be licensed to do it, because licenses are permissions to do that which would otherwise be illegal without the means of the license.
[48:28.660 --> 48:32.660]  Well, it's not illegal for the people to go from place to place.
[48:32.660 --> 48:41.660]  It's not illegal for the people to go from place to place using whatever means of conveyance they desire, because that's how we've always done it.
[48:41.660 --> 48:44.660]  So what has changed?
[48:44.660 --> 48:46.660]  Same thing, it always changes.
[48:46.660 --> 48:53.660]  Government's desire to have more control and power over us while giving us less to fight back with.
[48:53.660 --> 48:56.660]  It's always been the case.
[48:56.660 --> 48:58.660]  Okay.
[48:58.660 --> 49:08.660]  But when the court says that they can use the term automobile to convict you of an offense that requires a vehicle, the court is rewriting the statute.
[49:08.660 --> 49:14.660]  The court is changing the elements of the offense.
[49:14.660 --> 49:23.660]  They're not allowed to do that in a constitutional republic because the courts are not allowed to create law in a constitutional republic.
[49:23.660 --> 49:29.660]  Yet they do it through opinion every single day.
[49:29.660 --> 49:42.660]  And then the legislature does everything completely backwards and rewrites the legislation to max the court opinion most of the time.
[49:42.660 --> 49:45.660]  Not always, but most of the time.
[49:45.660 --> 50:00.660]  So the courts are controlling government from their position downward because what they say is also how it is enforced by the executive branch, regardless of what it actually says in the law itself.
[50:00.660 --> 50:19.660]  So what was the entire purpose of the legislature writing a law if the court could rewrite it and then the executive could interpret it in accordance with how the court rewrote it regardless of what it actually says, what it's actually limited to, what its actual purpose is.
[50:19.660 --> 50:26.660]  What it means, ladies and gentlemen, is you do not live in a constitutional republic.
[50:26.660 --> 50:39.660]  You live in a three prong oligarchy and all three prongs are controlled by the same group, the attorneys.
[50:39.660 --> 50:45.660]  That is not a constitutional republic.
[50:45.660 --> 50:54.660]  Not in any way, shape, or form.
[50:54.660 --> 51:04.660]  At this stage, I see no peaceful means by which we will ever reverse that problem.
[51:04.660 --> 51:17.660]  Because never in the history of mankind has any government, any government, willingly surrendered power it never had a right to in the first place.
[51:17.660 --> 51:28.660]  After it's gone through all the time and trouble of usurping it over a number of years, it has never, ever willingly given it up.
[51:28.660 --> 51:31.660]  Never.
[51:31.660 --> 51:38.660]  You find me any instance in history where that has ever happened.
[51:38.660 --> 51:42.660]  Because it hasn't.
[51:42.660 --> 51:48.660]  There's where our deepest issue lies. It's not the Queen of England.
[51:48.660 --> 51:52.660]  It is not the Pope. It is not the Vatican.
[51:52.660 --> 51:59.660]  It is not the 1812 Overture. It is not Columbus sailing in the wrong direction around flat earth to find the round earth on the other side.
[51:59.660 --> 52:02.660]  It's none of those things.
[52:02.660 --> 52:13.660]  It is simple, straight up, criminal conspiracy by people who know what they're doing because they designed a system that allows them to do it.
[52:13.660 --> 52:19.660]  It took them time to get it there. It took them time to mold it, shape it, and plant it out.
[52:19.660 --> 52:21.660]  But it's what's happened.
[52:21.660 --> 52:42.660]  And you're living in it. Whether you think so or not is irrelevant. If you really open your eyes and look around and wipe the fog off of them and the fluoride out of your brain, you'll see just how accurate this assessment of our situation really is.
[52:42.660 --> 52:44.660]  Think about that.
[52:44.660 --> 52:52.660]  All right. I've got one caller up on the board. I need some more. 512-646-1984.
[52:52.660 --> 53:00.660]  Right now, this looks like Gerald. Gerald, are you there?
[53:00.660 --> 53:01.660]  Josh.
[53:01.660 --> 53:04.660]  Josh? Well, this says Gerald Felice, but okay.
[53:04.660 --> 53:11.660]  That could be my father called in for me a few weeks ago. He must have put my number in the system somehow.
[53:11.660 --> 53:13.660]  Okay.
[53:13.660 --> 53:25.660]  I'm in Pennsylvania, actually. And what I wanted to ask you about tonight pertains to what they call in Pennsylvania, preliminary hearings.
[53:25.660 --> 53:30.660]  I believe out in your state they call them examining trials.
[53:30.660 --> 53:41.660]  Well, it really depends. What they call them here is first appearance because they do their damnedest not to give you the examining trial.
[53:41.660 --> 53:51.660]  So they call it either your first or initial appearance where they don't do any of the things they're required to do and they most certainly do not do what they're required to do in examining trials.
[53:51.660 --> 53:55.660]  But I get what you're saying, so continue.
[53:55.660 --> 54:08.660]  I will say from reading the statutes in your state relative to mine, there's actually more that they say about what you can and can't do in your state than mine.
[54:08.660 --> 54:25.660]  And Pennsylvania hearsay evidence is more than okay to prove a prima facie case, which is all that you have to do in Pennsylvania to continue the case forward.
[54:25.660 --> 54:51.660]  So my question really is, when it comes to these, in the state, preliminary hearings, a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction might, from listening to you guys for all these years, seem to be my only way to kind of throw a monkey in the wrench of what they're trying to do.
[54:51.660 --> 55:13.660]  But I know for a fact, if I go down to my JP with a motion, like a special appearance, here I'm bringing them a motion challenge subject matter jurisdiction, they're literally going to not file stamp it, not even tell me their name, and not take it at all.
[55:13.660 --> 55:21.660]  If they do take it from my hands, they're going to say I will deal with it at the hearing.
[55:21.660 --> 55:28.660]  As long as you make sure you get a copy that you keep for yourself, stamp showing it was delivered, so what?
[55:28.660 --> 55:30.660]  Well, they're not going to stamp anything.
[55:30.660 --> 55:45.660]  But even in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court ruling is valid that you can record public services to performance of their duties, and you don't have to inform them that you're doing it.
[55:45.660 --> 55:46.660]  So what's the problem?
[55:46.660 --> 55:48.660]  Okay.
[55:48.660 --> 55:53.660]  You think your video isn't proof that you filed it or that they refused it?
[55:53.660 --> 55:56.660]  Because it is.
[55:56.660 --> 56:06.660]  Okay, so after they do that, and I have the evidence of it, I'm assuming it would be a, well, in Pennsylvania we have the opportunity to file private criminal complaints.
[56:06.660 --> 56:07.660]  There we go.
[56:07.660 --> 56:09.660]  Okay, but here's the thing.
[56:09.660 --> 56:16.660]  If you're going to do that, there's a way to do it to ensure that you get the information you need to be effective.
[56:16.660 --> 56:33.660]  Okay, and it's not just simply going in and trying to file your documents, you need to go in there with a preconceived plan of action on how to get the information you need to do what you want to do next, which is basically disqualify this judge in his court from even hearing the case.
[56:33.660 --> 56:34.660]  Okay.
[56:34.660 --> 56:35.660]  Correct.
[56:35.660 --> 56:49.660]  So, given that, how do you do that? What can you do or say when you make that appearance in order to get it on record that there is no way you were going to get a fair shake in this courtroom?
[56:49.660 --> 56:51.660]  I'm all ears.
[56:51.660 --> 56:53.660]  Okay, well, think about it.
[56:53.660 --> 57:04.660]  You just started off very well, and you had a very good setup staring you right in the face by what you just said to me before I began this little bit here anyway.
[57:04.660 --> 57:10.660]  Okay, you go in, you file your documents, and they refuse to take them.
[57:10.660 --> 57:20.660]  What should be the very next thing you ask that court clerk when they refuse to take the documents?
[57:20.660 --> 57:27.660]  I don't know, something along the lines of, are you refusing access to a public court?
[57:27.660 --> 57:28.660]  No.
[57:28.660 --> 57:29.660]  I don't know.
[57:29.660 --> 57:30.660]  Do not get argumentative.
[57:30.660 --> 57:31.660]  Get inquisitive.
[57:31.660 --> 57:32.660]  Okay.
[57:32.660 --> 57:36.660]  Beating a hook, not beating a dead horse.
[57:36.660 --> 57:38.660]  Okay.
[57:38.660 --> 57:39.660]  Excuse me.
[57:39.660 --> 57:44.660]  Am I to understand that you are going to not allow me to file these documents?
[57:44.660 --> 57:45.660]  Yes, that's correct.
[57:45.660 --> 57:49.660]  Make sure you get the confirmation, right?
[57:49.660 --> 57:50.660]  Okay.
[57:50.660 --> 57:51.660]  Next thing.
[57:51.660 --> 58:01.660]  Could you please tell me, is that a specific policy of this court and this judge, or is this a decision you were making on your own?
[58:01.660 --> 58:02.660]  Got it.
[58:02.660 --> 58:03.660]  Okay.
[58:03.660 --> 58:08.660]  Now, where do you think you can build on from there?
[58:08.660 --> 58:15.660]  If they say it's the policy of the court, is that policy in writing, was it sent to you in an email?
[58:15.660 --> 58:23.660]  Is it in some sort of publication, handed to you or book, given to you by the court to tell you how to do your job and refuse these pleadings?
[58:23.660 --> 58:30.660]  Where can I find a copy of the information you're relying on to deny me my right to file these documents?
[58:30.660 --> 58:33.660]  See how all that works?
[58:33.660 --> 58:41.660]  You're stair-stepping them right into an open pit with plungy sticks at the bottom.
[58:41.660 --> 58:42.660]  With you so far.
[58:42.660 --> 58:43.660]  Okay.
[58:43.660 --> 58:44.660]  So after they either...
[58:44.660 --> 58:45.660]  Hang on just a second.
[58:45.660 --> 58:48.660]  Let me take this break and we'll finish this up on the other side.
[58:48.660 --> 58:49.660]  We'll be right back, folks.
[58:49.660 --> 58:50.660]  Hang on.
[58:50.660 --> 58:58.660]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.660 --> 59:06.660]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.660 --> 59:09.660]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.660 --> 59:18.660]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.660 --> 59:27.660]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.660 --> 59:33.660]  Bibles from America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.660 --> 59:47.660]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.660 --> 59:50.660]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.660 --> 01:00:00.660]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. Logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.660 --> 01:00:06.660]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.660 --> 01:00:17.660]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce,
[01:00:17.660 --> 01:00:28.660]  oil, Texas crude, $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude, $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core, $10,566.52,
[01:00:28.660 --> 01:00:45.660]  Ethereum, $227.26, XRP, Ripple, $0.33, Litecoin, $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:45.660 --> 01:00:57.660]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a tying suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[01:00:57.660 --> 01:00:59.660]  killing 10 and entering 40.
[01:00:59.660 --> 01:01:04.660]  Today in history.
[01:01:04.660 --> 01:01:18.660]  And recent news. Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hempett attacks his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones,
[01:01:18.660 --> 01:01:24.660]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the year for THC.
[01:01:24.660 --> 01:01:33.660]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:33.660 --> 01:01:47.660]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works,
[01:01:47.660 --> 01:02:01.660]  as well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.660 --> 01:02:12.660]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:12.660 --> 01:02:22.660]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches with their charged with.
[01:02:22.660 --> 01:02:38.660]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:38.660 --> 01:02:53.660]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:53.660 --> 01:03:22.660]  This is Book Roadie with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:22.660 --> 01:03:30.660]  Hi folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:30.660 --> 01:03:34.660]  All right, let's get back here and finish up by with our caller.
[01:03:34.660 --> 01:03:37.660]  All right, are you getting a picture now?
[01:03:37.660 --> 01:03:39.660]  No, I've been listening to you for years.
[01:03:39.660 --> 01:03:41.660]  I'm just trying to put a five.
[01:03:41.660 --> 01:03:42.660]  I don't know. I'm not knocking down.
[01:03:42.660 --> 01:03:49.660]  I'm just saying as far as the plan here on how to go in there and set them up for what you're needing, do you get the picture on that?
[01:03:49.660 --> 01:03:51.660]  Yeah, I absolutely do.
[01:03:51.660 --> 01:04:00.660]  As far as the criminal charge, would it be a state version in my state of official oppression?
[01:04:00.660 --> 01:04:16.660]  Exactly. The first thing you're going to do is file a judicial conduct complaint against that judge for the way he runs that court, how he is unlawfully delegating judicial authority to the clerks to decide whether or not the public can file petitions in their own case,
[01:04:16.660 --> 01:04:21.660]  how they can act as their own counsel, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:04:21.660 --> 01:04:37.660]  I'm kind of kicking myself because a few years ago over a small claim against myself, he did this exact same thing and we didn't push forward with that.
[01:04:37.660 --> 01:04:49.660]  We filed the judicial conduct complaint against the guy and the case went away on its own. That was probably our fault for not pushing the issue over a small thing.
[01:04:49.660 --> 01:04:53.660]  Now that it's a bigger thing, it's going to creep its ugly head up again.
[01:04:53.660 --> 01:04:58.660]  Okay, let me explain one thing to you and everyone else out there listening to this.
[01:04:58.660 --> 01:05:12.660]  When it comes to a public servant denying you in your rights, subverting the rule of law or otherwise violating their oath of office and the duties of their job, there is no such thing as a small thing.
[01:05:12.660 --> 01:05:17.660]  Ever.
[01:05:17.660 --> 01:05:23.660]  It's like every other bad thing that ever happens. It happens once it's an anomaly.
[01:05:23.660 --> 01:05:30.660]  If it continues to happen because no one cleans it up like the one bad apple sporting the whole barrel, then who is to blame?
[01:05:30.660 --> 01:05:36.660]  The apple or the person who failed to remove it when they had the chance?
[01:05:36.660 --> 01:05:42.660]  I'm certainly not going to let it happen again. I'll say that about, so it's about that. I will not let that happen again.
[01:05:42.660 --> 01:05:53.660]  But regardless, it would be a judicious upon the complaint, then a criminal charge against the magistrate for the way he runs this.
[01:05:53.660 --> 01:05:59.660]  And a motion to disqualify him and his staff from having anything to do with the case.
[01:05:59.660 --> 01:06:03.660]  File a change of venue on top of it.
[01:06:03.660 --> 01:06:10.660]  Gotcha. Gotcha. I can definitely craft something that would sound pretty good on paper with that.
[01:06:10.660 --> 01:06:19.660]  My next question. And this pertains to stuff that you've been talking about for years and I've been listening to you about for years.
[01:06:19.660 --> 01:06:31.660]  And I've heard you talk in bits and pieces, but I'm going to try and put it in a way that's really functional to the way I'm living currently.
[01:06:31.660 --> 01:06:37.660]  I'm a construction worker. I'm carpenter by trade.
[01:06:37.660 --> 01:06:53.660]  I have a work van. Whether it's my own work van, which has a corporate entity that owns it and that registers it, titles it, it's inspected and all that good stuff,
[01:06:53.660 --> 01:07:05.660]  or somebody else that I work for who has a corporation and gives it to me to drive to work.
[01:07:05.660 --> 01:07:08.660]  This is the world I live in. Okay.
[01:07:08.660 --> 01:07:19.660]  Now, when I get up in the morning, go out to either one of those vans and I hop in, turn the key, and I go to work.
[01:07:19.660 --> 01:07:30.660]  I'm not necessarily bringing... I don't have a dollar rating when I go there. I'm just bringing tools for the job.
[01:07:30.660 --> 01:07:35.660]  Okay. Hop on the job, work, then I go home.
[01:07:35.660 --> 01:07:40.660]  Then, you know, I might stop for a bite to eat on my way home from work.
[01:07:40.660 --> 01:07:49.660]  Sit down, have a bite to eat, maybe hit the gas station, fill up, and go home.
[01:07:49.660 --> 01:07:57.660]  When does transportation start in traveling and or vice versa?
[01:07:57.660 --> 01:08:01.660]  Well, the question goes back to what I said at the beginning. What is the use?
[01:08:01.660 --> 01:08:04.660]  And here is the caveat to what you're doing.
[01:08:04.660 --> 01:08:13.660]  One, if it was yours, the use would be applicable as to what you yourself are doing, but the vans are not yours.
[01:08:13.660 --> 01:08:20.660]  They belong to an incorporated entity whose sole purpose for existing is what?
[01:08:20.660 --> 01:08:21.660]  Commercial activity.
[01:08:21.660 --> 01:08:29.660]  Bingo. Therefore, any use of their van to further those ends is what?
[01:08:29.660 --> 01:08:30.660]  Commercial in nature.
[01:08:30.660 --> 01:08:35.660]  Bingo. See? Not so hard after all, is it?
[01:08:35.660 --> 01:08:38.660]  Nope. Just wanted to put a finer point on it.
[01:08:38.660 --> 01:08:52.660]  Now, incredibly, if that's the case, because when I was cited, I was behind the wheel of a commercial automobile.
[01:08:52.660 --> 01:09:01.660]  So therefore, any challenge of subject matter jurisdiction based on transportation wouldn't hold war.
[01:09:01.660 --> 01:09:03.660]  Well, that depends.
[01:09:03.660 --> 01:09:14.660]  You get a bill of lading, a commercial logbook, a confession, or a passenger manifest to prove that you were engaging in transportation.
[01:09:14.660 --> 01:09:19.660]  You got none of those things. You only asked me for identification, which I produced.
[01:09:19.660 --> 01:09:23.660]  Okay. But then again, he got no evidence of transportation.
[01:09:23.660 --> 01:09:29.660]  He made no investigative inquiry into whether or not you were using it for the purpose of transportation.
[01:09:29.660 --> 01:09:38.660]  Therefore, how's he going to prove it other than by his own legal conclusions and opinion, which a cop cannot introduce?
[01:09:38.660 --> 01:09:48.660]  Here's say may be fine at the preliminary hearing to see whether or not the facts and circumstances exist to allow it to go to trial so the actual evidence can be brought in to bear.
[01:09:48.660 --> 01:09:55.660]  But what evidence is he going to bring into court?
[01:09:55.660 --> 01:10:09.660]  They would have to pull the actual records of the vehicle to show that it is a commercial use vehicle and that you actually were using it for those purposes, which he could only do by those other pieces of evidence that he didn't get.
[01:10:09.660 --> 01:10:11.660]  Right?
[01:10:11.660 --> 01:10:21.660]  I hear you. Now, with that being said, is it safe to assume that a commercial motor vehicle could be used for noncommercial purposes?
[01:10:21.660 --> 01:10:31.660]  You can use anything for commercial or noncommercial purposes if it will do what is required to be done in order to facilitate the activity.
[01:10:31.660 --> 01:10:36.660]  That's how it becomes one or the other at any given time.
[01:10:36.660 --> 01:10:44.660]  The problem here is, once again, is the actual ownership use of this particular set of vehicles.
[01:10:44.660 --> 01:10:54.660]  It does not, however, remove the state's requirement to provide evidence of every element of the alleged offense. Now, does it?
[01:10:54.660 --> 01:10:55.660]  No, it doesn't.
[01:10:55.660 --> 01:11:08.660]  So they have to prove the use because they can't prove motor vehicle or commercial motor vehicle without the element of use.
[01:11:08.660 --> 01:11:14.660]  Now, you always do this to me, and I've heard you go on both sides.
[01:11:14.660 --> 01:11:18.660]  I'm not trying to do it to you. I'm trying to get you to understand exactly how they sliced this pie.
[01:11:18.660 --> 01:11:24.660]  And sometimes the slice is extremely thin, but it's still there.
[01:11:24.660 --> 01:11:33.660]  All right. On one hand, by the mere fact that a corporation owns the thing, it's automatically, all the time, commercial.
[01:11:33.660 --> 01:11:43.660]  No, their standard of assumption is that it's always commercial because it's always owned by the commercial entity.
[01:11:43.660 --> 01:11:44.660]  Okay.
[01:11:44.660 --> 01:11:45.660]  Okay.
[01:11:45.660 --> 01:11:51.660]  But the other element that still always exists is use.
[01:11:51.660 --> 01:11:53.660]  Okay.
[01:11:53.660 --> 01:11:56.660]  So use does trump?
[01:11:56.660 --> 01:11:57.660]  Absolutely.
[01:11:57.660 --> 01:11:58.660]  I don't want to trump it.
[01:11:58.660 --> 01:12:01.660]  Okay.
[01:12:01.660 --> 01:12:03.660]  All right.
[01:12:03.660 --> 01:12:04.660]  Okay.
[01:12:04.660 --> 01:12:10.660]  For instance, there is court cases on the books that says very clearly here in Texas as well.
[01:12:10.660 --> 01:12:13.660]  There was a guy who owned a furniture company.
[01:12:13.660 --> 01:12:15.660]  It was an incorporated furniture company.
[01:12:15.660 --> 01:12:24.660]  His company owned not only the store and all the furniture in it that he sold to customers and delivered to customers, but he owned a fleet of delivery trucks.
[01:12:24.660 --> 01:12:26.660]  Okay.
[01:12:26.660 --> 01:12:29.660]  I believe I could talk about this one years ago.
[01:12:29.660 --> 01:12:39.660]  And he bought a new store and was relocating all of his in-store inventory from his old store to his new store with his delivery trucks.
[01:12:39.660 --> 01:12:42.660]  Okay.
[01:12:42.660 --> 01:12:45.660]  His drivers got ticketed.
[01:12:45.660 --> 01:12:48.660]  He went to court and fought the tickets.
[01:12:48.660 --> 01:13:04.660]  And the court ruled that because he was moving his own property, incorporated or not, he was not engaged in commerce even though he was paying the drivers.
[01:13:04.660 --> 01:13:05.660]  See how that works?
[01:13:05.660 --> 01:13:09.660]  So it sounds very muddy, which is a good thing.
[01:13:09.660 --> 01:13:10.660]  It's not muddy.
[01:13:10.660 --> 01:13:14.660]  It just takes a level of willingness to understand it.
[01:13:14.660 --> 01:13:23.660]  I can pay you to do a job and you not be using everything you use to do that job for commercial purposes.
[01:13:23.660 --> 01:13:32.660]  For instance, your lunchbox has nothing to do with the commercial aspect of the job I put you on, even though you use it while you're on that job, right?
[01:13:32.660 --> 01:13:33.660]  Absolutely.
[01:13:33.660 --> 01:13:37.660]  Okay.
[01:13:37.660 --> 01:13:38.660]  I'm transporting it.
[01:13:38.660 --> 01:13:40.660]  There's no bill waiting for it.
[01:13:40.660 --> 01:13:42.660]  Exactly.
[01:13:42.660 --> 01:13:50.660]  And the contents over the years, it's not something that I could ever say was engaged in transportation because you had it with you.
[01:13:50.660 --> 01:13:51.660]  Same thing here.
[01:13:51.660 --> 01:13:59.660]  He was paying the people for their time to drive the trucks, but they were not getting paid for the moving of the stuff.
[01:13:59.660 --> 01:14:04.660]  They were only getting paid for their time to be in the cab, okay?
[01:14:04.660 --> 01:14:08.660]  Because the moving of the stuff was the guy's own property.
[01:14:08.660 --> 01:14:12.660]  That's like me hiring a friend to help me move my house.
[01:14:12.660 --> 01:14:15.660]  He's not a transportation business.
[01:14:15.660 --> 01:14:17.660]  That's not how he makes his living.
[01:14:17.660 --> 01:14:29.660]  He was not engaged in transportation just because I was compensating him for his time or his gas in helping me move.
[01:14:29.660 --> 01:14:30.660]  Right?
[01:14:30.660 --> 01:14:39.660]  Well, to put a fire point on that in the construction business, generally speaking, if somebody hires you, they give you their truck.
[01:14:39.660 --> 01:14:42.660]  They do not pay you for travel time.
[01:14:42.660 --> 01:14:44.660]  In other words, to get from A to B.
[01:14:44.660 --> 01:14:45.660]  Granted.
[01:14:45.660 --> 01:14:56.660]  Right off the bat, you're not getting compensated for your movement from your house to the job site.
[01:14:56.660 --> 01:14:57.660]  Okay.
[01:14:57.660 --> 01:15:02.660]  And neither were these guys. They only got paid for the time they were moving the stuff between the stores.
[01:15:02.660 --> 01:15:09.660]  It doesn't change the aspect of what we're talking about here.
[01:15:09.660 --> 01:15:22.660]  Because they were not actually using the roads between the stores for the purpose of engaging in business, it was not a transportation-related issue.
[01:15:22.660 --> 01:15:34.660]  He was simply relocating his inventory from one store to another and paying somebody for the time and effort to move it for him from here to there via the trucks.
[01:15:34.660 --> 01:15:35.660]  Okay.
[01:15:35.660 --> 01:15:39.660]  Got it. All plugged in. No reason to belabor it anymore.
[01:15:39.660 --> 01:15:40.660]  Okay.
[01:15:40.660 --> 01:15:41.660]  One more thing.
[01:15:41.660 --> 01:15:42.660]  Yeah.
[01:15:42.660 --> 01:15:47.660]  What does a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction?
[01:15:47.660 --> 01:15:51.660]  What is it supposed to look like?
[01:15:51.660 --> 01:16:02.660]  As soon as I say everybody was following the rules, I put that in, they actually file, stamp it, and they actually do what they're supposed to do.
[01:16:02.660 --> 01:16:04.660]  What are they supposed to do with that?
[01:16:04.660 --> 01:16:14.660]  Well, here in Texas, they would have to evaluate whether or not there was sufficient evidence to support the primary element of transportation in order for any of the other elements to even apply.
[01:16:14.660 --> 01:16:18.660]  Because they could not apply if transportation did not apply.
[01:16:18.660 --> 01:16:20.660]  That's the container part of it.
[01:16:20.660 --> 01:16:29.660]  You can't take something from inside the container and say it applies and then throw the container away as if it doesn't and can't or shouldn't.
[01:16:29.660 --> 01:16:35.660]  If the container doesn't apply, nothing in the container can apply.
[01:16:35.660 --> 01:16:42.660]  So when you challenge subject matter jurisdiction, you're saying the state cannot prove the existence of the primary element of transportation.
[01:16:42.660 --> 01:16:52.660]  The actual subject matter to which the alleged defense itself applies, which the license applies, which the motor vehicle applies, which everything applies.
[01:16:52.660 --> 01:16:54.660]  Without it, there is no offense.
[01:16:54.660 --> 01:16:56.660]  End of discussion.
[01:16:56.660 --> 01:16:57.660]  Hang on just a second.
[01:16:57.660 --> 01:16:59.660]  We'll finish this up on the other side.
[01:16:59.660 --> 01:17:04.660]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.660 --> 01:17:08.660]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares proven method.
[01:17:08.660 --> 01:17:14.660]  Michael Meares has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.660 --> 01:17:20.660]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:17:20.660 --> 01:17:24.660]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons?
[01:17:24.660 --> 01:17:26.660]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.660 --> 01:17:28.660]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:28.660 --> 01:17:33.660]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:17:33.660 --> 01:17:38.660]  The Michael Meares proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.660 --> 01:17:40.660]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.660 --> 01:17:49.660]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner or email MichaelMeares at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.660 --> 01:17:59.660]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:17:59.660 --> 01:18:04.660]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.660 --> 01:18:08.660]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.660 --> 01:18:13.660]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.660 --> 01:18:20.660]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.660 --> 01:18:21.660]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.660 --> 01:18:23.660]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:23.660 --> 01:18:29.660]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.660 --> 01:18:31.660]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.660 --> 01:18:34.660]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.660 --> 01:18:37.660]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.660 --> 01:18:43.660]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.660 --> 01:18:44.660]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.660 --> 01:18:45.660]  No.
[01:18:45.660 --> 01:18:47.660]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.660 --> 01:18:48.660]  No.
[01:18:48.660 --> 01:18:49.660]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.660 --> 01:18:50.660]  No.
[01:18:50.660 --> 01:18:51.660]  I mean yes.
[01:18:51.660 --> 01:18:54.660]  No giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.660 --> 01:18:55.660]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.660 --> 01:18:56.660]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.660 --> 01:18:58.660]  We are Logos.
[01:18:58.660 --> 01:19:22.660]  Happy Holidays Logos.
[01:19:22.660 --> 01:19:51.660]  Logos.
[01:19:51.660 --> 01:19:53.660]  All right folks, we are back.
[01:19:53.660 --> 01:20:00.660]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:20:00.660 --> 01:20:03.660]  I had several callers up on the board, a bunch of them dropped off.
[01:20:03.660 --> 01:20:06.660]  So if you're out there, please call back in and get in line.
[01:20:06.660 --> 01:20:08.660]  I'm trying to get to you as quick as I can.
[01:20:08.660 --> 01:20:11.660]  I just want to make sure that we have all this covered when we get to it.
[01:20:11.660 --> 01:20:13.660]  I don't like to leave anybody hanging out there.
[01:20:13.660 --> 01:20:15.660]  All right, last round here.
[01:20:15.660 --> 01:20:16.660]  What were you asking for?
[01:20:16.660 --> 01:20:17.660]  We had to go to break?
[01:20:17.660 --> 01:20:19.660]  Not much.
[01:20:19.660 --> 01:20:26.660]  I'm just going to pivot to functionally, I know what they're going to do.
[01:20:26.660 --> 01:20:31.660]  They're going to, they're not going to do what they're supposed to.
[01:20:31.660 --> 01:20:34.660]  They're not going to take my filing.
[01:20:34.660 --> 01:20:36.660]  So I know what to do there.
[01:20:36.660 --> 01:20:41.660]  But if by chance they do take it, what happens?
[01:20:41.660 --> 01:20:45.660]  I have a summons to appear on September 10th.
[01:20:45.660 --> 01:20:51.660]  Okay, they don't take that filing and they do what they always do.
[01:20:51.660 --> 01:20:55.660]  I have to appear on that date.
[01:20:55.660 --> 01:21:00.660]  How do I handle that with that hanging out there?
[01:21:00.660 --> 01:21:03.660]  In other words, you filed everything we talked about filing,
[01:21:03.660 --> 01:21:07.660]  the motion to disqualify, a motion to change venue,
[01:21:07.660 --> 01:21:09.660]  and a judicial conduct complaint and all that.
[01:21:09.660 --> 01:21:12.660]  And the day you appear, if no one's told you otherwise,
[01:21:12.660 --> 01:21:15.660]  you appear and you demand that they reschedule until a ruling
[01:21:15.660 --> 01:21:19.660]  on those motions has been made by whoever you filed them with.
[01:21:19.660 --> 01:21:22.660]  That this court has been disqualified for violation of rights
[01:21:22.660 --> 01:21:24.660]  and failure to comply with law,
[01:21:24.660 --> 01:21:27.660]  and you cannot get a fair and impartial trial here
[01:21:27.660 --> 01:21:29.660]  and you have filed paperwork with higher authority
[01:21:29.660 --> 01:21:31.660]  for exactly those reasons.
[01:21:31.660 --> 01:21:34.660]  All right, so I would take them in the state of Pennsylvania,
[01:21:34.660 --> 01:21:37.660]  you have your J.P. courts, your magistrate courts,
[01:21:37.660 --> 01:21:39.660]  then you have your court commonplace.
[01:21:39.660 --> 01:21:42.660]  So any of these things that we were just talking about
[01:21:42.660 --> 01:21:44.660]  should be filed with the court of commonplace?
[01:21:44.660 --> 01:21:47.660]  No, you have to file them with whoever the law says
[01:21:47.660 --> 01:21:49.660]  you have to file them with.
[01:21:49.660 --> 01:21:52.660]  For instance, here in Texas, you filed judicial conduct complaints
[01:21:52.660 --> 01:21:55.660]  with the Judicial Conduct Commission, not a court.
[01:21:55.660 --> 01:21:56.660]  Got you.
[01:21:56.660 --> 01:21:59.660]  To file a motion to disqualify, you have to file it with the court
[01:21:59.660 --> 01:22:03.660]  you're going to, and they're required to forward that motion
[01:22:03.660 --> 01:22:05.660]  to the head administrative judge of the district,
[01:22:05.660 --> 01:22:07.660]  which they never do.
[01:22:07.660 --> 01:22:11.660]  So you need to see the judge at the administrative level,
[01:22:11.660 --> 01:22:13.660]  even if you file in the lower court
[01:22:13.660 --> 01:22:15.660]  where you're supposed to be headed, okay?
[01:22:15.660 --> 01:22:16.660]  Gotcha.
[01:22:16.660 --> 01:22:17.660]  Because they won't do it.
[01:22:17.660 --> 01:22:19.660]  They'll just try to shuffle it around and hand it off
[01:22:19.660 --> 01:22:21.660]  to someone else and still bring you in
[01:22:21.660 --> 01:22:22.660]  and run you through the ringer.
[01:22:22.660 --> 01:22:23.660]  Don't let them do it.
[01:22:23.660 --> 01:22:25.660]  File a motion to disqualify
[01:22:25.660 --> 01:22:29.660]  because Texas law requires them to actually hold a hearing
[01:22:29.660 --> 01:22:31.660]  on that motion.
[01:22:31.660 --> 01:22:34.660]  And they try very hard not to ever do that either.
[01:22:34.660 --> 01:22:35.660]  Gotcha.
[01:22:35.660 --> 01:22:39.660]  Okay, so find out where your law says they have to be filed
[01:22:39.660 --> 01:22:41.660]  and that's where you file it.
[01:22:41.660 --> 01:22:42.660]  Never assume.
[01:22:42.660 --> 01:22:44.660]  Find out.
[01:22:44.660 --> 01:22:45.660]  Gotcha.
[01:22:45.660 --> 01:22:47.660]  Gotcha.
[01:22:47.660 --> 01:22:52.660]  All right, well, let me think here.
[01:22:52.660 --> 01:22:55.660]  I think you pretty much touched on all the high points
[01:22:55.660 --> 01:22:59.660]  of what I was wondering about.
[01:22:59.660 --> 01:23:04.660]  If I do wind up in that courtroom,
[01:23:04.660 --> 01:23:09.660]  on that day when I was supposed to appear,
[01:23:09.660 --> 01:23:11.660]  how do I proceed?
[01:23:11.660 --> 01:23:15.660]  Do I just object to everything that's going on
[01:23:15.660 --> 01:23:17.660]  because they ignored everything?
[01:23:17.660 --> 01:23:20.660]  Objection, a motion to disqualify,
[01:23:20.660 --> 01:23:21.660]  a motion for change of venue,
[01:23:21.660 --> 01:23:23.660]  and several judicial conduct complaints
[01:23:23.660 --> 01:23:25.660]  have been filed against the judge of this court.
[01:23:25.660 --> 01:23:28.660]  I cannot receive a fair and impartial trial
[01:23:28.660 --> 01:23:30.660]  and I demand that this hearing be reset
[01:23:30.660 --> 01:23:35.660]  until those motions have been ruled upon.
[01:23:35.660 --> 01:23:37.660]  What if you were to rule on them on the spot?
[01:23:37.660 --> 01:23:40.660]  He can't rule on something that disqualifies him.
[01:23:40.660 --> 01:23:43.660]  He can't rule on a judicial conduct complaint
[01:23:43.660 --> 01:23:45.660]  regarding his behavior.
[01:23:45.660 --> 01:23:46.660]  That's the whole point.
[01:23:46.660 --> 01:23:48.660]  When he does, you object to it.
[01:23:48.660 --> 01:23:53.660]  You object and you file new ones for exactly that.
[01:23:53.660 --> 01:23:57.660]  You file another series of them showing just how lawless
[01:23:57.660 --> 01:24:02.660]  and illegal this judge is willing to behave.
[01:24:02.660 --> 01:24:03.660]  All right.
[01:24:03.660 --> 01:24:05.660]  Well, I think I have my marching orders.
[01:24:05.660 --> 01:24:07.660]  Well, they're not marching orders,
[01:24:07.660 --> 01:24:09.660]  but hopefully they're decent instructions.
[01:24:09.660 --> 01:24:13.660]  Well, I think it's a little difficult.
[01:24:13.660 --> 01:24:15.660]  I appreciate your time.
[01:24:15.660 --> 01:24:17.660]  Like I said, I've been listening to you for years.
[01:24:17.660 --> 01:24:20.660]  I've been able to muddle through the world
[01:24:20.660 --> 01:24:25.660]  utilizing a lot of your advice to good advantage.
[01:24:25.660 --> 01:24:30.660]  But this one, this particular instance,
[01:24:30.660 --> 01:24:33.660]  I'm actually going to have to fight a real fight.
[01:24:33.660 --> 01:24:35.660]  So I appreciate you being out there
[01:24:35.660 --> 01:24:38.660]  and I'll do my best to support you guys.
[01:24:38.660 --> 01:24:41.660]  And like I said, I can't say anything more
[01:24:41.660 --> 01:24:43.660]  than that I appreciate you being out there.
[01:24:43.660 --> 01:24:46.660]  Appreciate appreciation.
[01:24:46.660 --> 01:24:50.660]  Well, on that note, if you wouldn't mind,
[01:24:50.660 --> 01:24:52.660]  I'm going to shoot you an email,
[01:24:52.660 --> 01:24:57.660]  just to get an update on whatever I don't have
[01:24:57.660 --> 01:25:00.660]  from your traffic seminar.
[01:25:00.660 --> 01:25:03.660]  When was the last update you got?
[01:25:03.660 --> 01:25:06.660]  When I bought them probably three years ago.
[01:25:06.660 --> 01:25:07.660]  Okay.
[01:25:07.660 --> 01:25:09.660]  There hasn't been one in the last three years.
[01:25:09.660 --> 01:25:11.660]  The paperwork is pretty well set.
[01:25:11.660 --> 01:25:14.660]  So if you've gotten one within the last five,
[01:25:14.660 --> 01:25:16.660]  then you're up to date.
[01:25:16.660 --> 01:25:18.660]  Okay.
[01:25:18.660 --> 01:25:19.660]  Sounds good.
[01:25:19.660 --> 01:25:20.660]  Okay.
[01:25:20.660 --> 01:25:22.660]  I will march forward.
[01:25:22.660 --> 01:25:23.660]  Okay.
[01:25:23.660 --> 01:25:24.660]  Appreciate you calling in.
[01:25:24.660 --> 01:25:25.660]  Thanks.
[01:25:25.660 --> 01:25:26.660]  Yep, bye-bye.
[01:25:26.660 --> 01:25:27.660]  Bye-bye.
[01:25:27.660 --> 01:25:31.660]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984
[01:25:31.660 --> 01:25:33.660]  if you want to call in and get in line.
[01:25:33.660 --> 01:25:34.660]  Otherwise, I'm going to have to go back
[01:25:34.660 --> 01:25:36.660]  to doing diatribes here to the end of the show.
[01:25:36.660 --> 01:25:38.660]  In the meantime, we have one other caller up.
[01:25:38.660 --> 01:25:40.660]  This is John in New York.
[01:25:40.660 --> 01:25:43.660]  John, what do you have?
[01:25:43.660 --> 01:25:44.660]  Hi.
[01:25:44.660 --> 01:25:45.660]  Hi, Eddie.
[01:25:45.660 --> 01:25:46.660]  Hi.
[01:25:46.660 --> 01:25:47.660]  Tell me something.
[01:25:47.660 --> 01:25:52.660]  I heard a commercial for the traffic seminar,
[01:25:52.660 --> 01:25:55.660]  and it sounds exactly like something I'd like to do.
[01:25:55.660 --> 01:25:58.660]  Please, can you tell me the cost?
[01:25:58.660 --> 01:26:00.660]  I think it was a 60-second commercial,
[01:26:00.660 --> 01:26:02.660]  and it doesn't go into everything.
[01:26:02.660 --> 01:26:03.660]  It gives you an idea.
[01:26:03.660 --> 01:26:06.660]  It wraps up very, very well what you're going to get,
[01:26:06.660 --> 01:26:09.660]  but expound on it a little bit,
[01:26:09.660 --> 01:26:11.660]  and tell me a little bit about it,
[01:26:11.660 --> 01:26:14.660]  a little bit more about it, and the cost involved.
[01:26:14.660 --> 01:26:15.660]  It does.
[01:26:15.660 --> 01:26:16.660]  $250.
[01:26:16.660 --> 01:26:18.660]  It comes with an electronic book
[01:26:18.660 --> 01:26:21.660]  that teaches you how to read and understand a statute
[01:26:21.660 --> 01:26:24.660]  the way it was intended to be read and understood.
[01:26:24.660 --> 01:26:29.660]  It teaches, it's got a 400-plus handwritten legal pleadings in it
[01:26:29.660 --> 01:26:34.660]  that I wrote when I first put it together,
[01:26:34.660 --> 01:26:37.660]  and they teach you how to write legal documents,
[01:26:37.660 --> 01:26:40.660]  how to make legal arguments, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:26:40.660 --> 01:26:41.660]  It's a learning course.
[01:26:41.660 --> 01:26:44.660]  It's something to teach you how to do what the attorneys do
[01:26:44.660 --> 01:26:47.660]  without the school.
[01:26:47.660 --> 01:26:49.660]  And how much is it again, $350?
[01:26:49.660 --> 01:26:50.660]  $250.
[01:26:50.660 --> 01:26:54.660]  The constitutional challenge is $200 on top of that
[01:26:54.660 --> 01:26:57.660]  if you want it separately.
[01:26:57.660 --> 01:26:58.660]  Right.
[01:26:58.660 --> 01:27:01.660]  But that challenge is specific to Texas
[01:27:01.660 --> 01:27:04.660]  because of how our statute was enacted.
[01:27:04.660 --> 01:27:05.660]  Right.
[01:27:05.660 --> 01:27:09.660]  Now, this is something I can use in New York.
[01:27:09.660 --> 01:27:11.660]  You can use it anywhere since the entire purpose
[01:27:11.660 --> 01:27:14.660]  is to teach you how to read and understand law,
[01:27:14.660 --> 01:27:16.660]  no matter where the law is.
[01:27:16.660 --> 01:27:17.660]  Got you.
[01:27:17.660 --> 01:27:18.660]  Okay, got it.
[01:27:18.660 --> 01:27:21.660]  It requires that you update the pleadings
[01:27:21.660 --> 01:27:23.660]  to match the law of your state,
[01:27:23.660 --> 01:27:26.660]  but at least you have some clue of what you're looking for,
[01:27:26.660 --> 01:27:29.660]  why you're looking for it, and how to use it.
[01:27:29.660 --> 01:27:30.660]  Got it.
[01:27:30.660 --> 01:27:31.660]  Yep, I understand.
[01:27:31.660 --> 01:27:36.660]  All right.
[01:27:36.660 --> 01:27:39.660]  Tell me how to get around this little problem.
[01:27:39.660 --> 01:27:42.660]  We have situations where we've called the police.
[01:27:42.660 --> 01:27:44.660]  I think I've mentioned this to you before.
[01:27:44.660 --> 01:27:47.660]  And I just want to make sure I understand.
[01:27:47.660 --> 01:27:50.660]  It's my understanding, and you tell me if I'm right or wrong,
[01:27:50.660 --> 01:27:53.660]  when police come and you've got,
[01:27:53.660 --> 01:27:56.660]  say you've got very disruptive neighbors.
[01:27:56.660 --> 01:27:59.660]  And I mean, it's not disruption anymore.
[01:27:59.660 --> 01:28:00.660]  They've threatened your life.
[01:28:00.660 --> 01:28:02.660]  They threatened you with bodily harm.
[01:28:02.660 --> 01:28:04.660]  Some of them have actually punched you in the eye
[01:28:04.660 --> 01:28:06.660]  like one of my neighbors got punched in the eye.
[01:28:06.660 --> 01:28:09.660]  She was sitting on her front steps,
[01:28:09.660 --> 01:28:12.660]  minding her own business, wasn't talking to anybody.
[01:28:12.660 --> 01:28:15.660]  Neighbor from across the street just comes flying across the street,
[01:28:15.660 --> 01:28:18.660]  running over to her, waving her arms in her face
[01:28:18.660 --> 01:28:20.660]  until she connected with her eye.
[01:28:20.660 --> 01:28:24.660]  And we called the cops, and of course the police did nothing.
[01:28:24.660 --> 01:28:26.660]  And how many times that's happened,
[01:28:26.660 --> 01:28:28.660]  the next door neighbor, they got in the car,
[01:28:28.660 --> 01:28:33.660]  they gunned the engine, they came straight for that same neighbor,
[01:28:33.660 --> 01:28:37.660]  and the neighbor was holding her three-year-old granddaughter
[01:28:37.660 --> 01:28:41.660]  in her arms, and they came gunning for her with the car.
[01:28:41.660 --> 01:28:44.660]  The little girl looks up, sees the car coming and goes,
[01:28:44.660 --> 01:28:47.660]  Grandma, they're going to hit us with the car.
[01:28:47.660 --> 01:28:49.660]  The little three-year-old knew better than the police.
[01:28:49.660 --> 01:28:52.660]  She called the police, the police did nothing.
[01:28:52.660 --> 01:28:57.660]  Now, I understand that the police actually have to witness something.
[01:28:57.660 --> 01:28:58.660]  No, they don't.
[01:28:58.660 --> 01:29:00.660]  Is that the case?
[01:29:00.660 --> 01:29:04.660]  Okay. How come they did not take her complaint?
[01:29:04.660 --> 01:29:08.660]  They said they would, and then they didn't.
[01:29:08.660 --> 01:29:12.660]  Probably because of the way she tried to tell them about the incident.
[01:29:12.660 --> 01:29:14.660]  Here's the way this works.
[01:29:14.660 --> 01:29:16.660]  Okay?
[01:29:16.660 --> 01:29:21.660]  Cops pay very close attention to the words used to describe a particular situation.
[01:29:21.660 --> 01:29:22.660]  Okay?
[01:29:22.660 --> 01:29:23.660]  Right.
[01:29:23.660 --> 01:29:27.660]  What they hear is combined with how they feel about the people involved,
[01:29:27.660 --> 01:29:30.660]  good, bad, or ugly. Okay?
[01:29:30.660 --> 01:29:31.660]  Okay.
[01:29:31.660 --> 01:29:38.660]  Now, if she had used words like feared for my life or the life of my granddaughter
[01:29:38.660 --> 01:29:43.660]  while this car was screaming toward us on the road,
[01:29:43.660 --> 01:29:47.660]  the cops are going to pay more attention to that than you simply complaining about.
[01:29:47.660 --> 01:29:50.660]  They just worded their car at us and almost hit us, blah, blah, blah.
[01:29:50.660 --> 01:29:51.660]  Okay?
[01:29:51.660 --> 01:29:54.660]  You see the difference in the way those two can be perceived?
[01:29:54.660 --> 01:29:55.660]  Well, yeah.
[01:29:55.660 --> 01:29:59.660]  Okay. Hang on just a second, Ben, and let me finish this break and we'll go into it.
[01:30:02.660 --> 01:30:07.660]  RFID technology can be used to identify, track, and locate things like boxes
[01:30:07.660 --> 01:30:09.660]  as they move through a warehouse.
[01:30:09.660 --> 01:30:12.660]  But would you use the technology to send social smoke signals?
[01:30:12.660 --> 01:30:16.660]  Look at Dr. Kaffir and Albrecht, and I'll be back with more in just a moment.
[01:30:16.660 --> 01:30:18.660]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.660 --> 01:30:22.660]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.660 --> 01:30:26.660]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.660 --> 01:30:28.660]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.660 --> 01:30:32.660]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.660 --> 01:30:34.660]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.660 --> 01:30:38.660]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.660 --> 01:30:42.660]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.660 --> 01:30:45.660]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.660 --> 01:30:48.660]  Makers of blue sig smokeless electronic cigarettes
[01:30:48.660 --> 01:30:53.660]  are embedding their product with radio frequency microchips or RFID technology.
[01:30:53.660 --> 01:30:56.660]  When the chip packs get within 30 feet of each other,
[01:30:56.660 --> 01:31:01.660]  they light up, vibrate, and swap information so smokers can find each other in a crowd.
[01:31:01.660 --> 01:31:04.660]  Later, the data gets uploaded to Blue Sig's website
[01:31:04.660 --> 01:31:07.660]  when users plug their packs into a computer for recharging.
[01:31:07.660 --> 01:31:11.660]  While high-tech cigarettes may help smokers find kindred spirits,
[01:31:11.660 --> 01:31:14.660]  they also let Blue Sig identify and track them.
[01:31:14.660 --> 01:31:19.660]  Chips could also be tracked by bar owners, employers, or anyone else who chooses to.
[01:31:19.660 --> 01:31:22.660]  That's a high price to pay for a little company.
[01:31:22.660 --> 01:31:30.660]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.660 --> 01:31:33.660]  I lost my son. My uncle. My uncle. My son.
[01:31:33.660 --> 01:31:35.660]  On September 11, 2004.
[01:31:35.660 --> 01:31:39.660]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.660 --> 01:31:43.660]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.660 --> 01:31:46.660]  The official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[01:31:46.660 --> 01:31:50.660]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence
[01:31:50.660 --> 01:31:52.660]  and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:52.660 --> 01:31:55.660]  Bring justice to my son. My uncle. My nephew. My son.
[01:31:55.660 --> 01:31:57.660]  Go to BuildingWhat.org.
[01:31:57.660 --> 01:32:00.660]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:00.660 --> 01:32:05.660]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.660 --> 01:32:07.660]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[01:32:07.660 --> 01:32:09.660]  and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:09.660 --> 01:32:12.660]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:12.660 --> 01:32:15.660]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:15.660 --> 01:32:17.660]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:17.660 --> 01:32:19.660]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:19.660 --> 01:32:22.660]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:22.660 --> 01:32:25.660]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.660 --> 01:32:28.660]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Katie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:28.660 --> 01:32:31.660]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.660 --> 01:32:33.660]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:33.660 --> 01:32:35.660]  and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.660 --> 01:32:37.660]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:37.660 --> 01:32:40.660]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.660 --> 01:32:42.660]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:42.660 --> 01:32:45.660]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[01:32:45.660 --> 01:32:47.660]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:47.660 --> 01:32:50.660]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.660 --> 01:32:52.660]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[01:32:52.660 --> 01:32:54.660]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.660 --> 01:32:57.660]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society
[01:32:57.660 --> 01:32:59.660]  we all want and deserve.
[01:33:03.660 --> 01:33:06.660]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:33:06.660 --> 01:33:11.660]  At LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:32.660 --> 01:33:34.660]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:33:34.660 --> 01:33:36.660]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:36.660 --> 01:33:40.660]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:33:40.660 --> 01:33:44.660]  We have two more segments, including this one.
[01:33:44.660 --> 01:33:47.660]  Alright, let's get back to John in New York.
[01:33:47.660 --> 01:33:50.660]  Okay, as I was saying, you can see the distinction
[01:33:50.660 --> 01:33:52.660]  in the way those two things are worded
[01:33:52.660 --> 01:33:57.660]  and how the cop is capable of perceiving them in certain ways.
[01:33:57.660 --> 01:33:58.660]  Okay?
[01:33:58.660 --> 01:33:59.660]  Got it.
[01:33:59.660 --> 01:34:03.660]  Usually when it comes to domestic disputes between neighbors,
[01:34:03.660 --> 01:34:06.660]  cops take a blind eye to almost all things
[01:34:06.660 --> 01:34:12.660]  without some sort of countermanding evidence
[01:34:12.660 --> 01:34:14.660]  that would prove that it needs to be taken more seriously,
[01:34:14.660 --> 01:34:17.660]  such as a bullet hole beside your front door, for instance.
[01:34:17.660 --> 01:34:18.660]  Okay?
[01:34:18.660 --> 01:34:19.660]  Right.
[01:34:19.660 --> 01:34:24.660]  In disputes between neighbors, cops tend to look at,
[01:34:24.660 --> 01:34:29.660]  he said, she said, much more than there's clear evidence here
[01:34:29.660 --> 01:34:32.660]  that some crime was committed.
[01:34:32.660 --> 01:34:34.660]  Alright?
[01:34:34.660 --> 01:34:35.660]  Okay.
[01:34:35.660 --> 01:34:38.660]  Now, for instance, I've got a lady who lives right across the street
[01:34:38.660 --> 01:34:39.660]  from us over here.
[01:34:39.660 --> 01:34:42.660]  She has been nothing but a bane to the neighbors
[01:34:42.660 --> 01:34:43.660]  since she's moved in.
[01:34:43.660 --> 01:34:46.660]  She is the most reprehensible woman on the face of the planet
[01:34:46.660 --> 01:34:49.660]  I have ever had the displeasure to encounter.
[01:34:49.660 --> 01:34:50.660]  Okay?
[01:34:50.660 --> 01:34:53.660]  She had lived in this house less than six months,
[01:34:53.660 --> 01:34:55.660]  or two months rather, and had called the cops on us
[01:34:55.660 --> 01:34:59.660]  six different times because I was playing frisbee
[01:34:59.660 --> 01:35:03.660]  in the front yard with my dog, our front yard.
[01:35:03.660 --> 01:35:04.660]  Okay?
[01:35:04.660 --> 01:35:05.660]  Well, that's a crime in itself.
[01:35:05.660 --> 01:35:06.660]  You know, that's terrible.
[01:35:06.660 --> 01:35:08.660]  Well, that's the way they tried to catch it anyway.
[01:35:08.660 --> 01:35:14.660]  And then, one night, I was standing outside
[01:35:14.660 --> 01:35:18.660]  and talking to a friend of mine, and this woman comes home
[01:35:18.660 --> 01:35:24.660]  and intentionally swerves her Lexus SUV directly at me
[01:35:24.660 --> 01:35:25.660]  where I'm standing up on the curb.
[01:35:25.660 --> 01:35:30.660]  And I literally have to jump out of the way or get hit.
[01:35:30.660 --> 01:35:31.660]  Okay?
[01:35:31.660 --> 01:35:32.660]  The way this one.
[01:35:32.660 --> 01:35:37.660]  And then she calls the cops on me right then.
[01:35:37.660 --> 01:35:38.660]  Okay?
[01:35:38.660 --> 01:35:41.660]  When the cops showed up, I explained what happened,
[01:35:41.660 --> 01:35:43.660]  and I said in no uncertain terms,
[01:35:43.660 --> 01:35:47.660]  I felt my life was in danger because she intentionally swerved
[01:35:47.660 --> 01:35:50.660]  her car at me and tried to hit me.
[01:35:50.660 --> 01:35:54.660]  And if I had not jumped out of the way, I would have been hit.
[01:35:54.660 --> 01:35:55.660]  And seriously injured.
[01:35:55.660 --> 01:35:58.660]  And I had a witness standing right there next to me.
[01:35:58.660 --> 01:36:00.660]  And he goes, it's true, she did.
[01:36:00.660 --> 01:36:01.660]  That's exactly what she did.
[01:36:01.660 --> 01:36:05.660]  And the Austin Police Department did absolutely nothing except
[01:36:05.660 --> 01:36:08.660]  look at me and go, sounds like you feared for your life.
[01:36:08.660 --> 01:36:11.660]  I was going, I just said that.
[01:36:11.660 --> 01:36:13.660]  Okay?
[01:36:13.660 --> 01:36:16.660]  Even with that information and an eyewitness,
[01:36:16.660 --> 01:36:21.660]  they looked at it only as a dispute between neighbors' situation.
[01:36:21.660 --> 01:36:25.660]  And they don't like disputes between neighbors' situations unless
[01:36:25.660 --> 01:36:31.660]  they don't like one of the neighbors involved for personal reasons.
[01:36:31.660 --> 01:36:32.660]  Okay?
[01:36:32.660 --> 01:36:33.660]  All right.
[01:36:33.660 --> 01:36:37.660]  So that's generally the way they're going to do it.
[01:36:37.660 --> 01:36:41.660]  And my advice is this.
[01:36:41.660 --> 01:36:46.660]  Have this woman or whoever it is that lives in the house that she
[01:36:46.660 --> 01:36:50.660]  stays at, install security cameras facing out to the street and
[01:36:50.660 --> 01:36:55.660]  across to the other neighbor's home.
[01:36:55.660 --> 01:37:01.660]  And do it with cameras that has multiple angles and perspectives so
[01:37:01.660 --> 01:37:05.660]  that the entire scene can be seen in one whole picture just by
[01:37:05.660 --> 01:37:07.660]  looking at the individual cameras.
[01:37:07.660 --> 01:37:10.660]  The front porch of the house where she was sitting the day they
[01:37:10.660 --> 01:37:14.660]  walked up and hit her can be seen in at least one camera.
[01:37:14.660 --> 01:37:17.660]  The approach from across the street can be seen.
[01:37:17.660 --> 01:37:21.660]  The intermediate travel from there to the location where the assault
[01:37:21.660 --> 01:37:24.660]  occurred, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:37:24.660 --> 01:37:25.660]  Okay?
[01:37:25.660 --> 01:37:29.660]  At least then you can take those videos down and file charges with
[01:37:29.660 --> 01:37:33.660]  a prosecuting attorney or some magistrate.
[01:37:33.660 --> 01:37:34.660]  Right.
[01:37:34.660 --> 01:37:35.660]  All right.
[01:37:35.660 --> 01:37:39.660]  Now, how about a verified complaint or a verified information?
[01:37:39.660 --> 01:37:42.660]  Well, as far as I know, the public can't do
[01:37:42.660 --> 01:37:43.660]  information.
[01:37:43.660 --> 01:37:46.660]  The prosecuting attorneys generate information based upon complaints.
[01:37:46.660 --> 01:37:47.660]  Yes.
[01:37:47.660 --> 01:37:50.660]  In almost any state that I'm aware of she could go down and swear out
[01:37:50.660 --> 01:37:53.660]  a complaint in front of some magistrate or in front of some
[01:37:53.660 --> 01:37:57.660]  prosecuting attorney and they are required to do whatever the law
[01:37:57.660 --> 01:37:59.660]  requires them to do with it.
[01:37:59.660 --> 01:38:01.660]  Right.
[01:38:01.660 --> 01:38:06.660]  But the problem remains exactly what I said.
[01:38:06.660 --> 01:38:12.660]  He said, she said, a three-year-old will never be allowed to
[01:38:12.660 --> 01:38:15.660]  testify in a court of law as a witness.
[01:38:15.660 --> 01:38:20.660]  Therefore, it is your friend's word against the neighbor's word
[01:38:20.660 --> 01:38:24.660]  about how the car approached her and her granddaughter.
[01:38:24.660 --> 01:38:25.660]  Right.
[01:38:25.660 --> 01:38:26.660]  Okay?
[01:38:26.660 --> 01:38:27.660]  Okay.
[01:38:27.660 --> 01:38:28.660]  So therein lies the problem.
[01:38:28.660 --> 01:38:31.660]  The cops are looking at it from, I really don't want to be involved
[01:38:31.660 --> 01:38:32.660]  in this.
[01:38:32.660 --> 01:38:33.660]  Nobody's got any evidence.
[01:38:33.660 --> 01:38:36.660]  It's going to be a he said, she said situation with just that to go
[01:38:36.660 --> 01:38:37.660]  on.
[01:38:37.660 --> 01:38:39.660]  There's nothing I can do here.
[01:38:39.660 --> 01:38:42.660]  And they're right because there's nothing a prosecutor can do
[01:38:42.660 --> 01:38:47.660]  there either without some actual evidence, which means a disinterested
[01:38:47.660 --> 01:38:51.660]  third-party witness or audio and video.
[01:38:51.660 --> 01:38:52.660]  Okay.
[01:38:52.660 --> 01:38:57.660]  And I take it that the same applies when the neighbor ran from
[01:38:57.660 --> 01:39:01.660]  across the street through no provocation on the part of the
[01:39:01.660 --> 01:39:03.660]  victim and starts punching her in the face.
[01:39:03.660 --> 01:39:04.660]  Let me ask this question.
[01:39:04.660 --> 01:39:05.660]  One.
[01:39:05.660 --> 01:39:06.660]  Same thing.
[01:39:06.660 --> 01:39:08.660]  How are you going to prove no provocation?
[01:39:08.660 --> 01:39:11.660]  Who was there to witness the assault?
[01:39:11.660 --> 01:39:14.660]  Who was there to hear what preceded the assault?
[01:39:14.660 --> 01:39:17.660]  Who was there to hear and see what occurred during and after the
[01:39:17.660 --> 01:39:20.660]  assault, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera?
[01:39:20.660 --> 01:39:24.660]  Is this not just more he said, she said?
[01:39:24.660 --> 01:39:27.660]  Well, I guess according to what you're telling me, yep.
[01:39:27.660 --> 01:39:29.660]  No, it's not according to what I'm telling you.
[01:39:29.660 --> 01:39:33.660]  It's according to the facts and circumstances you gave me.
[01:39:33.660 --> 01:39:35.660]  She was on the porch.
[01:39:35.660 --> 01:39:36.660]  The neighbor came across.
[01:39:36.660 --> 01:39:40.660]  Who was there to witness that other than the neighbor and her?
[01:39:40.660 --> 01:39:42.660]  That's right.
[01:39:42.660 --> 01:39:43.660]  Yep.
[01:39:43.660 --> 01:39:44.660]  Okay.
[01:39:44.660 --> 01:39:49.660]  Well, I also had one cop say to me and say, we have a problem in
[01:39:49.660 --> 01:39:52.660]  this town and the police are not doing their job.
[01:39:52.660 --> 01:39:53.660]  And that's a fact.
[01:39:53.660 --> 01:39:54.660]  That can't be argued.
[01:39:54.660 --> 01:39:57.660]  Well, then here is what has to change.
[01:39:57.660 --> 01:40:01.660]  You have to give them a way to do their job better.
[01:40:01.660 --> 01:40:05.660]  And evidence would do that.
[01:40:05.660 --> 01:40:10.660]  Well, no, you're not here.
[01:40:10.660 --> 01:40:11.660]  You don't see it.
[01:40:11.660 --> 01:40:12.660]  No, you're missing my point.
[01:40:12.660 --> 01:40:15.660]  It doesn't matter if I'm there.
[01:40:15.660 --> 01:40:22.660]  Had she had video evidence of the assault or the car, guess what?
[01:40:22.660 --> 01:40:26.660]  Things would have most likely been a whole lot different in what the
[01:40:26.660 --> 01:40:29.660]  cops could have and would have done.
[01:40:29.660 --> 01:40:30.660]  I agree.
[01:40:30.660 --> 01:40:32.660]  But the police in this town have a problem.
[01:40:32.660 --> 01:40:33.660]  Again.
[01:40:33.660 --> 01:40:34.660]  I'm not going to go into it over there.
[01:40:34.660 --> 01:40:35.660]  Okay.
[01:40:35.660 --> 01:40:36.660]  Doesn't matter.
[01:40:36.660 --> 01:40:40.660]  Even if the police didn't do it, you still had something to take to
[01:40:40.660 --> 01:40:44.660]  a magistrate or prosecuting attorney and they could have done
[01:40:44.660 --> 01:40:45.660]  something with it.
[01:40:45.660 --> 01:40:49.660]  But they're in the same position the cops are when there's nothing to
[01:40:49.660 --> 01:40:52.660]  base the evidence on.
[01:40:52.660 --> 01:40:53.660]  Yeah, I got it.
[01:40:53.660 --> 01:40:56.660]  I got it.
[01:40:56.660 --> 01:40:57.660]  Okay.
[01:40:57.660 --> 01:41:00.660]  Thank you very much.
[01:41:00.660 --> 01:41:03.660]  At some point in the future, I'm going to let you know what I'm going to
[01:41:03.660 --> 01:41:05.660]  do about the problem in this town.
[01:41:05.660 --> 01:41:06.660]  There is a problem.
[01:41:06.660 --> 01:41:09.660]  And it's exacerbated.
[01:41:09.660 --> 01:41:13.660]  It's only what you're telling me is factual.
[01:41:13.660 --> 01:41:14.660]  What you're telling me is right.
[01:41:14.660 --> 01:41:16.660]  Cops got to have evidence.
[01:41:16.660 --> 01:41:20.660]  But what's making it worse is the police are also not doing their
[01:41:20.660 --> 01:41:21.660]  job.
[01:41:21.660 --> 01:41:23.660]  And we'll get into that another time.
[01:41:23.660 --> 01:41:28.660]  And I'll show you incidents and what the cops said.
[01:41:28.660 --> 01:41:29.660]  Okay.
[01:41:29.660 --> 01:41:34.660]  Well, that takes you into another curve ball.
[01:41:34.660 --> 01:41:39.660]  What exactly do you perceive is the cop's job versus what the cop
[01:41:39.660 --> 01:41:42.660]  perceives is their job?
[01:41:42.660 --> 01:41:43.660]  Yeah.
[01:41:43.660 --> 01:41:45.660]  Because according to what you perceive, they're there to serve and
[01:41:45.660 --> 01:41:46.660]  protect.
[01:41:46.660 --> 01:41:49.660]  But according to what the courts say, they're not there to serve and
[01:41:49.660 --> 01:41:50.660]  protect.
[01:41:50.660 --> 01:41:52.660]  They're only there to enforce.
[01:41:52.660 --> 01:41:57.660]  And they have whatever discretion they want to have in doing that.
[01:41:57.660 --> 01:42:01.660]  Well, they need to take to serve and protect off their car.
[01:42:01.660 --> 01:42:05.660]  Well, again, you missed the point there, too.
[01:42:05.660 --> 01:42:09.660]  Does it say to serve and protect the public or the people of or
[01:42:09.660 --> 01:42:11.660]  anything of that nature?
[01:42:11.660 --> 01:42:13.660]  Or does it just say to serve and protect?
[01:42:13.660 --> 01:42:16.660]  It says to serve and protect a reasonable person.
[01:42:16.660 --> 01:42:17.660]  What?
[01:42:17.660 --> 01:42:18.660]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:42:18.660 --> 01:42:19.660]  Knows what that means.
[01:42:19.660 --> 01:42:20.660]  No.
[01:42:20.660 --> 01:42:21.660]  There you go.
[01:42:21.660 --> 01:42:25.660]  You're assuming stuff again.
[01:42:25.660 --> 01:42:27.660]  Okay.
[01:42:27.660 --> 01:42:31.660]  When laced potato chips advertises you can't eat just one.
[01:42:31.660 --> 01:42:34.660]  Simply because of the context of the commercial, you assume they're
[01:42:34.660 --> 01:42:36.660]  talking about a potato chip, right?
[01:42:36.660 --> 01:42:39.660]  And a laced potato chip specifically, right?
[01:42:39.660 --> 01:42:40.660]  That's right.
[01:42:40.660 --> 01:42:45.660]  But what if they're talking about a piece of a Hershey bar?
[01:42:45.660 --> 01:42:47.660]  I could advertise them for 40 years.
[01:42:47.660 --> 01:42:49.660]  You're missing my point again.
[01:42:49.660 --> 01:42:51.660]  But I consider that.
[01:42:51.660 --> 01:42:57.660]  The point is, is that the words can be inferred to mean anything.
[01:42:57.660 --> 01:43:03.660]  The only thing that changes is the context in which they're being used.
[01:43:03.660 --> 01:43:07.660]  And your perception of context and someone else's perception of
[01:43:07.660 --> 01:43:12.660]  context can never be said to always be the same, can they?
[01:43:12.660 --> 01:43:13.660]  That's right.
[01:43:13.660 --> 01:43:14.660]  I got you.
[01:43:14.660 --> 01:43:18.660]  I understand to serve and protect, but take it off the car because
[01:43:18.660 --> 01:43:20.660]  they ain't serving them and protecting them.
[01:43:20.660 --> 01:43:21.660]  You don't know that.
[01:43:21.660 --> 01:43:25.660]  They may very well be serving and protecting their corporate owners.
[01:43:25.660 --> 01:43:26.660]  Yeah.
[01:43:26.660 --> 01:43:27.660]  That's right.
[01:43:27.660 --> 01:43:28.660]  That's right.
[01:43:28.660 --> 01:43:30.660]  And they're serving and protecting the criminal.
[01:43:30.660 --> 01:43:31.660]  And that's what I've seen.
[01:43:31.660 --> 01:43:32.660]  So one other time.
[01:43:32.660 --> 01:43:33.660]  Another time.
[01:43:33.660 --> 01:43:34.660]  You've been very good.
[01:43:34.660 --> 01:43:36.660]  And I thank you very much for your help.
[01:43:36.660 --> 01:43:38.660]  Yes, sir.
[01:43:38.660 --> 01:43:39.660]  Thank you.
[01:43:39.660 --> 01:43:40.660]  You're welcome.
[01:43:40.660 --> 01:43:41.660]  Have a good night.
[01:43:41.660 --> 01:43:42.660]  You too.
[01:43:42.660 --> 01:43:43.660]  All right, folks.
[01:43:43.660 --> 01:43:45.660]  We are now coming up in the last segment.
[01:43:45.660 --> 01:43:53.660]  I have an empty collar board, so if anybody's out there that's got a question, comment, or anything like that, please call in 512-646-1984,
[01:43:53.660 --> 01:43:56.660]  or I'm just going to rant and ray for 15 minutes until we're off to air.
[01:43:56.660 --> 01:43:57.660]  I'll be right back.
[01:43:57.660 --> 01:43:59.660]  So yawning in there.
[01:43:59.660 --> 01:44:05.660]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:05.660 --> 01:44:08.660]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:08.660 --> 01:44:10.660]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:10.660 --> 01:44:16.660]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:16.660 --> 01:44:24.660]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:24.660 --> 01:44:30.660]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:30.660 --> 01:44:33.660]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[01:44:33.660 --> 01:44:39.660]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.660 --> 01:44:47.660]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.660 --> 01:44:51.660]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.660 --> 01:44:58.660]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:58.660 --> 01:45:00.660]  Order now.
[01:45:00.660 --> 01:45:14.660]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:14.660 --> 01:45:18.660]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.660 --> 01:45:22.660]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.660 --> 01:45:27.660]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.660 --> 01:45:33.660]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:33.660 --> 01:45:42.660]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.660 --> 01:45:51.660]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro safe tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.660 --> 01:46:00.660]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:21.660 --> 01:46:36.660]  Alright folks, we are back in the last segment of Monday Night Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:36.660 --> 01:46:39.660]  It's about to begin.
[01:46:39.660 --> 01:46:43.660]  Alright, that said, we have a couple people up on the call board this round here.
[01:46:43.660 --> 01:46:49.660]  First one up appears to be Jeff Coleman. Is that right?
[01:46:49.660 --> 01:46:51.660]  Yes, Eddie.
[01:46:51.660 --> 01:46:52.660]  Hi.
[01:46:52.660 --> 01:46:54.660]  How are you?
[01:46:54.660 --> 01:46:58.660]  I'm well so far, but we'll see how that turns out by the end of the call.
[01:46:58.660 --> 01:47:04.660]  Alright, first time caller and almost make sure you're the show anyways.
[01:47:04.660 --> 01:47:10.660]  Anyways, this happened 814 just recently, a couple of days back.
[01:47:10.660 --> 01:47:12.660]  Okay.
[01:47:12.660 --> 01:47:16.660]  I live in California Stockton, Stockton, California.
[01:47:16.660 --> 01:47:17.660]  Okay.
[01:47:17.660 --> 01:47:32.660]  I'm on my motorcycle and so I see a cop parked on the stop sign inside the parking lot of a CDS drugstore.
[01:47:32.660 --> 01:47:34.660]  So then I proceeded to go to the stop.
[01:47:34.660 --> 01:47:36.660]  Wait, wait, wait. Repeat that one more time.
[01:47:36.660 --> 01:47:44.660]  Okay, so the cop is inside the, behind the stop sign on the CDS store like the exit.
[01:47:44.660 --> 01:47:46.660]  He's in the parking lot.
[01:47:46.660 --> 01:47:47.660]  Okay.
[01:47:47.660 --> 01:47:48.660]  It's inside.
[01:47:48.660 --> 01:47:52.660]  He's inside the parking lot of the place.
[01:47:52.660 --> 01:47:54.660]  He's not in public.
[01:47:54.660 --> 01:47:55.660]  Okay.
[01:47:55.660 --> 01:48:07.660]  So I stopped at the stop sign because there was three cars, two cars, one pickup truck who was going to make a left and going into the road that I'm trying to get in.
[01:48:07.660 --> 01:48:08.660]  So with me.
[01:48:08.660 --> 01:48:09.660]  Yeah.
[01:48:09.660 --> 01:48:10.660]  Okay.
[01:48:10.660 --> 01:48:18.660]  There was another BMW, an older model, late 80s, early, I mean late 90s, early 2000s.
[01:48:18.660 --> 01:48:23.660]  He was going to, I think, try to beat the red light.
[01:48:23.660 --> 01:48:29.660]  So I went ahead and proceeded to go and make the turn.
[01:48:29.660 --> 01:48:33.660]  And I hear a honking horn.
[01:48:33.660 --> 01:48:35.660]  So I'm on my motorcycle.
[01:48:35.660 --> 01:48:43.660]  I was just sure if the guy was honking at me or what, looked in my mirrors, I couldn't see anything, you know, with the limited visibility.
[01:48:43.660 --> 01:48:46.660]  So I was just going ahead and going along.
[01:48:46.660 --> 01:48:56.660]  I got about 200 yards away from the intersection where I entered.
[01:48:56.660 --> 01:49:02.660]  Here comes the same cop that I saw parked in the CDS drug store.
[01:49:02.660 --> 01:49:12.660]  And so he came at a high rate of speed, like in his mind, like he was going to chase me or he was chasing me.
[01:49:12.660 --> 01:49:16.660]  Like what a, you know, police officer is already being in the chase.
[01:49:16.660 --> 01:49:18.660]  That's how he was.
[01:49:18.660 --> 01:49:22.660]  So I turned into a street.
[01:49:22.660 --> 01:49:24.660]  I didn't stop right away on that road.
[01:49:24.660 --> 01:49:30.660]  I turned into a street on the side of the street where you can park the vehicle and, you know, shouldn't be a problem.
[01:49:30.660 --> 01:49:36.660]  I remember that from years back when I was listening to you on YouTube.
[01:49:36.660 --> 01:49:51.660]  And then before I get put in my motorcycle peg down, he's already behind me and barking orders.
[01:49:51.660 --> 01:49:58.660]  So when he's already barking orders at me like I'm a criminal or something, and I had to tell this guy that, hey, calm down.
[01:49:58.660 --> 01:50:00.660]  And then he says, you don't tell me what to do.
[01:50:00.660 --> 01:50:02.660]  I say, you need to calm down.
[01:50:02.660 --> 01:50:04.660]  And then he says, you don't tell me what to do.
[01:50:04.660 --> 01:50:06.660]  I calm down.
[01:50:06.660 --> 01:50:19.660]  So I haven't pulled my phone or anything at this, but I'm relying on his video camera that's on his chest and on the vehicle.
[01:50:19.660 --> 01:50:23.660]  I have the pace in between me and him.
[01:50:23.660 --> 01:50:29.660]  And then so now I'm like, I don't have any protection from him.
[01:50:29.660 --> 01:50:37.660]  And I think this guy is just, I don't know, a day before there was CHP officer there, a guy shot Southern California.
[01:50:37.660 --> 01:50:43.660]  So I think he is a little bit on the edge there for what's happening.
[01:50:43.660 --> 01:50:47.660]  And my thing is I didn't want to be a statistic.
[01:50:47.660 --> 01:50:51.660]  I'm a black person.
[01:50:51.660 --> 01:50:53.660]  So I didn't want to be a statistic.
[01:50:53.660 --> 01:50:58.660]  I mean, I can see he's already, he's already hyped up.
[01:50:58.660 --> 01:51:09.660]  So then he tells me to stay on my bike and then ask for papers like driver's license, registration and insurance.
[01:51:09.660 --> 01:51:19.660]  In my mind, I just want to go ahead and I didn't want to go through the whole thing like, you know, giving him information because he's already installed for somehow.
[01:51:19.660 --> 01:51:29.660]  So I just went ahead and, you know, I said, okay, I'll just go ahead and agree with this guy, but I'm going to go ahead and file a complaint against him.
[01:51:29.660 --> 01:51:34.660]  So I got up and then he tells me to sit on my bike.
[01:51:34.660 --> 01:51:39.660]  So now I'm like, you want me to get papers and things, but you want me to sit on the bike.
[01:51:39.660 --> 01:51:44.660]  It's in the bike and things that I need.
[01:51:44.660 --> 01:51:49.660]  So he already holds in his gun at this point, but not on hold third.
[01:51:49.660 --> 01:51:57.660]  So then I'm like, you know what, can you go ahead and call the supervisor or somebody, get a supervisor out of here.
[01:51:57.660 --> 01:52:08.660]  And then when I gave him my license, and I told him, you know, just pass, I said, by the way, I'm not going to sign the ticket.
[01:52:08.660 --> 01:52:12.660]  You can just go ahead and, you know, and then he says, well, turn around, you're under arrest.
[01:52:12.660 --> 01:52:15.660]  But what, you're under arrest for what?
[01:52:15.660 --> 01:52:19.660]  He says, we're not signing the ticket.
[01:52:19.660 --> 01:52:22.660]  You know what, you know, call your supervisor.
[01:52:22.660 --> 01:52:25.660]  So he gets in his car.
[01:52:25.660 --> 01:52:28.660]  He calls backup.
[01:52:28.660 --> 01:52:29.660]  Backup comes out.
[01:52:29.660 --> 01:52:32.660]  The guy got there.
[01:52:32.660 --> 01:52:34.660]  He already had on his gloves.
[01:52:34.660 --> 01:52:37.660]  That's how red he was.
[01:52:37.660 --> 01:52:41.660]  He already got his gloves on.
[01:52:41.660 --> 01:52:51.660]  So I'm like, you really are something so simple for somebody who is, I call him for somebody who is practicing his right.
[01:52:51.660 --> 01:52:55.660]  You're going to call a backup right away.
[01:52:55.660 --> 01:53:02.660]  And then the other guy leaves, and then another motorcycle gets there, and then later, you know, we're waiting for the supervisor.
[01:53:02.660 --> 01:53:04.660]  And then same thing with the supervisor.
[01:53:04.660 --> 01:53:06.660]  He says, well, you can get under arrest.
[01:53:06.660 --> 01:53:08.660]  I said, well, that's going to be under arrest.
[01:53:08.660 --> 01:53:12.660]  So I'm going to sign that, you know, and I don't want to sign it if you're putting me under arrest.
[01:53:12.660 --> 01:53:15.660]  He says, well, you can call it what you want.
[01:53:15.660 --> 01:53:19.660]  And then my thing is, I don't care getting going to jail or something.
[01:53:19.660 --> 01:53:29.660]  I don't work in a place in 2009, but I couldn't remember if I need to drop off my wife to her work that night or not.
[01:53:29.660 --> 01:53:33.660]  So then I got scared, you know, I don't want to, because of my wife.
[01:53:33.660 --> 01:53:35.660]  I got scared of my wife.
[01:53:35.660 --> 01:53:38.660]  If I don't drop her off, she'll get mad.
[01:53:38.660 --> 01:53:42.660]  So that's, so I went ahead and got the ticket.
[01:53:42.660 --> 01:53:49.660]  What do I need to do from here?
[01:53:49.660 --> 01:53:53.660]  What do you mean, what do you need to do from here?
[01:53:53.660 --> 01:53:56.660]  I got the, he gave me the ticket.
[01:53:56.660 --> 01:54:04.660]  I went ahead and agreed, or I went ahead and signed it, but at least I have it on video that I said that I am under arrest.
[01:54:04.660 --> 01:54:11.660]  Does California require a signature on a citation?
[01:54:11.660 --> 01:54:15.660]  California blanketed everything.
[01:54:15.660 --> 01:54:17.660]  What?
[01:54:17.660 --> 01:54:20.660]  California has blanketed everything.
[01:54:20.660 --> 01:54:22.660]  That does not answer my question.
[01:54:22.660 --> 01:54:28.660]  I don't know one what you mean by blanketed, and blanketed is not an explanation for what I asked.
[01:54:28.660 --> 01:54:35.660]  Does California law require a signature on a traffic citation?
[01:54:35.660 --> 01:54:37.660]  That I am not sure.
[01:54:37.660 --> 01:54:39.660]  Then you need to find out.
[01:54:39.660 --> 01:54:44.660]  Since it is a civil infraction, I doubt it.
[01:54:44.660 --> 01:54:48.660]  And it most certainly is not an arrestable offense.
[01:54:48.660 --> 01:54:57.660]  If you don't do it, in which case the officer touched you without probable cause and any legal necessity to do so.
[01:54:57.660 --> 01:55:07.660]  The fact that he grabbed you to place you under arrest illegally makes what he did while wearing a loaded gun aggravated assault.
[01:55:07.660 --> 01:55:13.660]  Had he actually taken you from the location, it would have added aggravated kidnapping to it.
[01:55:13.660 --> 01:55:18.660]  As it was, it was false imprisonment.
[01:55:18.660 --> 01:55:24.660]  Or at least, you know, did he actually put the cuss on you?
[01:55:24.660 --> 01:55:29.660]  I didn't want to go that route because I'm pretty sure he's going to throw me on the ground.
[01:55:29.660 --> 01:55:35.660]  And I didn't want to, you know, my face on the hot pavement.
[01:55:35.660 --> 01:55:39.660]  Okay, the thing about it is, is what you're telling me is you didn't.
[01:55:39.660 --> 01:55:41.660]  You weren't prepared for this.
[01:55:41.660 --> 01:55:43.660]  Okay.
[01:55:43.660 --> 01:55:49.660]  If you were, you would have had something accessible that you could have turned on immediately when this encounter occurred to recording.
[01:55:49.660 --> 01:55:55.660]  Because relying on their recordings is a big, big mistake.
[01:55:55.660 --> 01:55:56.660]  Okay.
[01:55:56.660 --> 01:55:58.660]  But I did have some recordings though.
[01:55:58.660 --> 01:55:59.660]  I did have some recordings.
[01:55:59.660 --> 01:56:03.660]  I went on Facebook live, but I did not go through the thing.
[01:56:03.660 --> 01:56:09.660]  I was just kind of like, you know, for him to at least something for me to show that I wasn't, you know.
[01:56:09.660 --> 01:56:10.660]  Okay.
[01:56:10.660 --> 01:56:11.660]  I don't know.
[01:56:11.660 --> 01:56:16.660]  Did you stream the entire encounter live?
[01:56:16.660 --> 01:56:17.660]  No.
[01:56:17.660 --> 01:56:19.660]  Then you screwed up.
[01:56:19.660 --> 01:56:20.660]  End of discussion.
[01:56:20.660 --> 01:56:29.660]  What you did after the fact is 100% irrelevant because nothing in your video shows anything that actually happened, right?
[01:56:29.660 --> 01:56:30.660]  There is.
[01:56:30.660 --> 01:56:36.660]  Like half of the whole thing from all the way to the end where the supervisor gets there.
[01:56:36.660 --> 01:56:47.660]  And then I was, I had the supervisor on video saying that I'm going to be under arrest if I don't sign, that he's going to put me under arrest.
[01:56:47.660 --> 01:56:51.660]  I thought you said the other guy said that.
[01:56:51.660 --> 01:56:52.660]  He did say that.
[01:56:52.660 --> 01:56:58.660]  And then when the supervisor got there and then I told him, I didn't want to sign the ticket that he's trying to give me.
[01:56:58.660 --> 01:57:01.660]  And then he said, well, you're going to get arrested.
[01:57:01.660 --> 01:57:11.660]  Then you need to find out whether or not the statute allows him to authorize for not signing a civil infraction ticket if this offense that they're alleging is actually a civil infraction.
[01:57:11.660 --> 01:57:15.660]  Okay.
[01:57:15.660 --> 01:57:24.660]  And then on the ticket itself, there was a choice there whether it's commercial and then it says commercial yes or no.
[01:57:24.660 --> 01:57:26.660]  And then he puts no obviously.
[01:57:26.660 --> 01:57:27.660]  Okay.
[01:57:27.660 --> 01:57:29.660]  Again, that's not relevant.
[01:57:29.660 --> 01:57:30.660]  Okay.
[01:57:30.660 --> 01:57:32.660]  No.
[01:57:32.660 --> 01:57:36.660]  Because on those citations, commercial is a weight class.
[01:57:36.660 --> 01:57:40.660]  It does nothing to change their perception of what you're doing.
[01:57:40.660 --> 01:57:44.660]  It simply means it is not a commercial weight class vehicle.
[01:57:44.660 --> 01:57:52.660]  Something that weighs 26,001 pounds or more carries more than 16 passengers, including the driver or bears a hazardous materials placard.
[01:57:52.660 --> 01:57:56.660]  That's what commercial means in that respect.
[01:57:56.660 --> 01:57:57.660]  Okay.
[01:57:57.660 --> 01:57:59.660]  Does it mean commercial use?
[01:57:59.660 --> 01:58:02.660]  All commercial use.
[01:58:02.660 --> 01:58:04.660]  Got it?
[01:58:04.660 --> 01:58:05.660]  Got it.
[01:58:05.660 --> 01:58:06.660]  Okay.
[01:58:06.660 --> 01:58:12.660]  As far as what you need to do, you need to file complaints against the officer for physically touching you without lawful authority to do so.
[01:58:12.660 --> 01:58:20.660]  He attempted to arrest you for an unarrestable offense, which is not not signing the citation provided California law doesn't require it.
[01:58:20.660 --> 01:58:23.660]  When do you have to go to court?
[01:58:23.660 --> 01:58:25.660]  Next month, I believe.
[01:58:25.660 --> 01:58:29.660]  Okay, then you need to call back in next Monday and we'll pick this up from there, okay?
[01:58:29.660 --> 01:58:30.660]  Okay.
[01:58:30.660 --> 01:58:31.660]  All right.
[01:58:31.660 --> 01:58:32.660]  You have a good night.
[01:58:32.660 --> 01:58:33.660]  Thanks for calling.
[01:58:33.660 --> 01:58:36.660]  Everybody else, I'm sorry I was not able to get to you in the time that I had left.
[01:58:36.660 --> 01:58:38.660]  Jeff, thanks for calling in, man.
[01:58:38.660 --> 01:58:39.660]  All right.
[01:58:39.660 --> 01:58:41.660]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show.
[01:58:41.660 --> 01:58:45.660]  I am out of time, folks, but I want to thank you for calling in and for listening.
[01:58:45.660 --> 01:58:48.660]  Y'all keep us in your financial prayers wherever you can.
[01:58:48.660 --> 01:58:49.660]  Good night.
[01:58:49.660 --> 01:58:50.660]  God bless.
[01:58:50.660 --> 01:58:57.660]  The Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.660 --> 01:59:08.660]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.660 --> 01:59:11.660]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.660 --> 01:59:20.660]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.660 --> 01:59:30.660]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.660 --> 01:59:32.660]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.660 --> 01:59:41.660]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.660 --> 01:59:49.660]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.660 --> 01:59:52.660]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.660 --> 01:59:53.660]  You found it.
[01:59:53.660 --> 02:00:03.660]  LogosRadioNetwork.com