ROL_2019-08-02_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.900]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[00:06.900 --> 00:13.320]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.320 --> 00:21.520]  Silver $16.45 an ounce, Copper $2.75 an ounce, Oil, Texas Crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent Crude
[00:21.520 --> 00:29.760]  $62.47 a barrel, and Cryptos in order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $20.00
[00:29.760 --> 00:41.440]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.440 --> 00:52.600]  10. History The year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on
[00:52.600 --> 00:58.360]  Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and
[00:58.360 --> 01:00.360]  entering 40 today in history.
[01:00.360 --> 01:09.520]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hemp and
[01:09.520 --> 01:14.240]  attacks his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin,
[01:14.240 --> 01:18.000]  San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to
[01:18.000 --> 01:22.360]  file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:22.360 --> 01:27.240]  equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney
[01:27.240 --> 01:31.280]  announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery
[01:31.280 --> 01:33.880]  of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:33.880 --> 01:37.760]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.760 --> 01:42.240]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.240 --> 01:48.440]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.440 --> 01:54.680]  well as other cities too, like the district attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.680 --> 01:59.120]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:59.120 --> 02:01.920]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.920 --> 02:06.920]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.920 --> 02:10.920]  in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.920 --> 02:13.640]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.640 --> 02:17.560]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.560 --> 02:22.760]  charged with.
[02:22.760 --> 02:27.400]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[02:27.400 --> 02:32.520]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.520 --> 02:38.160]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.160 --> 02:39.640]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.640 --> 02:44.400]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its
[02:44.400 --> 02:50.240]  front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.240 --> 02:53.120]  flow.
[02:53.120 --> 03:11.700]  This is Rook Rody with your Lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:11.700 --> 03:26.100]  Well, I received my remedy today, came in a box just like the bait, I accepted it for
[03:26.100 --> 03:36.180]  fire right away, it's not true, no, not later, we are originators, and the pathway seems to
[03:36.180 --> 03:44.820]  get straighter every day, and I could take anything that belongs to me and put it to good use,
[03:46.500 --> 03:51.140]  but I was good for the gander, gonna work for the goose.
[03:57.140 --> 04:04.420]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain with our radio, and we're talking to Tim in Texas,
[04:04.420 --> 04:09.220]  and Tim, we will keep you on the line as long as you keep saying good things about me.
[04:10.500 --> 04:15.700]  Okay, Randy, you're a pretty good looking guy.
[04:17.140 --> 04:26.020]  No, no, no, Pastor Massit, he's someone that I trust his opinion, he told me that I have a face made
[04:26.020 --> 04:37.380]  for radio. Oh, that was a nice way of saying it. I was just in Chicago with my older brother,
[04:38.340 --> 04:46.660]  and I had on this red shirt with a little darker red t-shirt underneath, and my sister-in-law,
[04:46.660 --> 04:52.740]  his wife said, you know, that really looks nice, and my brother is always real quiet, he doesn't,
[04:52.740 --> 05:00.260]  he's always the peacemaker, so he never does much. He looked across and he said, yeah,
[05:00.260 --> 05:10.340]  it does, it looks like a hot air balloon. Ouch! Yeah, that's the first time my brother ever stung me.
[05:12.740 --> 05:19.700]  He learned from the best. Well, we're fine, we're getting along pretty good. I took that as a good
[05:19.700 --> 05:28.580]  sign. Right. Well, I was going to point out to you the five things that the appeals court requested
[05:29.300 --> 05:38.100]  from me, and we got them to them the same day. The first one was the, it's called the counter
[05:38.100 --> 05:46.740]  defendants' motion to dismiss, plea to the jurisdiction and all. In the plea to the jurisdiction,
[05:46.740 --> 05:54.820]  it says, Tixler's claims against the Newark defendants, which would be the attorneys and the
[05:54.820 --> 06:02.260]  board, Newark defendants failed to invoke this court's jurisdiction. In fact, he insists the
[06:02.260 --> 06:09.140]  court does not have jurisdiction. Okay, so that's kind of a tricky maneuver there, and therefore,
[06:09.140 --> 06:09.860]  wouldn't you say?
[06:09.860 --> 06:17.860]  Wait a minute, I'm not sure what that question was. There are too many pronouns.
[06:19.140 --> 06:29.620]  For the, I messed up Rockefeller and Fort. For them to say that they said that I tried to invoke
[06:29.620 --> 06:34.740]  the court's jurisdiction in my counterclaim, this is what this whole suit's over.
[06:34.740 --> 06:42.660]  Okay. Now I remember, I now know where you're going. What these morons said was, these guys
[06:42.660 --> 06:49.300]  claim we didn't have subject matter jurisdiction. Right. Therefore, they can't have subject
[06:49.300 --> 06:56.020]  matter jurisdiction either. Well, where'd you come up with that? They're making, they're making the,
[06:56.020 --> 07:03.940]  taking the legal position that if the court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear
[07:03.940 --> 07:11.460]  their claim, then it necessarily did not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear our claim.
[07:12.420 --> 07:21.220]  Okay, can I interject something? Go ahead. We're calling them morons, but apparently this judge
[07:21.220 --> 07:29.700]  who's been an attorney in this town for 30 years is now the district judge. So he's just like,
[07:29.700 --> 07:37.780]  you know, this is, this is like his first big case, civil case. And he rules in their favor.
[07:39.700 --> 07:45.700]  But he apparently would have ruled in their favor no matter what.
[07:46.420 --> 07:53.940]  Well, that's what that is. And it shows his character. Okay. So then the next thing they
[07:53.940 --> 08:02.260]  wanted to see was the order. And so this shows the order, the original, their counterclaim against
[08:02.260 --> 08:09.060]  our, excuse me, their motion to dismiss our counterclaim was in November of 2017.
[08:10.980 --> 08:20.900]  There, the court's order was in February of 2018. And then they asked for, let's see, this is May
[08:20.900 --> 08:28.260]  of 2000. What is this called? I can't remember what this is. Newer counter defendants' motion
[08:28.260 --> 08:36.580]  to sever dismiss claims and render final judgment. So they put that motion in there in May of 2018.
[08:37.220 --> 08:46.100]  And then opposite, then we put an opposition to severance and render, which was two weeks later.
[08:46.100 --> 08:58.100]  And about frugal silence. And then the court ordered the motion to sever dismiss claims
[08:58.100 --> 09:03.540]  and render final judgment. So that's the five things that the appeals court asked for.
[09:04.740 --> 09:12.820]  So is that a good sign, which you said? That is a very good sign. They're going straight
[09:12.820 --> 09:19.140]  to subject matter jurisdiction. Okay. And that has been our claim the entire time.
[09:19.940 --> 09:25.780]  And it has never been answered. In fact, wait, yes, it has been answered.
[09:27.380 --> 09:35.620]  The court of appeals in our writ of mandamus ruled that the original court did not have
[09:35.620 --> 09:42.900]  subject matter jurisdiction. And that was our claim. The original, they've already ruled on our claim.
[09:44.100 --> 09:50.340]  You talked about the municipal court. Yes. Okay. Since the municipal court did not have jurisdiction,
[09:51.540 --> 09:57.700]  they could not transfer jurisdiction to the district court. That was our argument.
[09:57.700 --> 10:10.980]  Is there some unwritten code that a judge, when he sees that he has taken the bait of the attorneys,
[10:12.580 --> 10:19.940]  that he shouldn't say, since the original case, there was no subject matter in the original case,
[10:19.940 --> 10:28.500]  I see that we should drop your case, but he didn't do that. He allowed the suit to remain
[10:28.500 --> 10:35.460]  against me, the district judge. Yes. He shouldn't drop it. He shouldn't drop it.
[10:36.500 --> 10:43.460]  But because apparently, and I don't know enough about this, so maybe you can straighten me out,
[10:43.460 --> 10:54.980]  about jurisdiction. I've been reading that if you answer the court, it gives them standing
[10:54.980 --> 11:02.020]  for jurisdiction. If you have not challenged it, but we challenged it the whole way.
[11:02.820 --> 11:12.740]  No, no, no. We challenged the ability of the plaintiff to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction
[11:12.740 --> 11:22.100]  of the court. Once we were in the court, then there's the jurisdiction is two parts.
[11:25.460 --> 11:33.380]  Does the plaintiff have jurisdiction? And if they do or don't, does the defendant have jurisdiction?
[11:33.380 --> 11:42.500]  Did we have the legal standing to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court
[11:42.500 --> 11:52.740]  in our counterclaim? That's a separate question rather than did the plaintiff have
[11:52.740 --> 11:59.060]  subject matter jurisdiction to start the case in the first place. Once the case was started,
[11:59.060 --> 12:10.260]  you were forced to respond. So you were engaged by the court. That gave you legal standing to
[12:10.260 --> 12:19.140]  invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in your behalf. Okay. So they were saying that
[12:19.140 --> 12:25.060]  since we didn't have jurisdiction, they can't have jurisdiction either. That's nonsense.
[12:25.060 --> 12:32.340]  And in the in the pleadings, they just said that. And that violated one of my rules.
[12:33.060 --> 12:40.180]  Never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth. And in our responses, we addressed
[12:40.180 --> 12:48.420]  that issue that they made this out of their own mouth. They provided no statutory or case law
[12:48.420 --> 12:58.500]  support of their claim. They just made it. So it was meaningless. And what the court is asking for
[12:59.860 --> 13:05.540]  are just the right documents. They're asking for the documents that would go to the issue
[13:06.180 --> 13:11.860]  of jurisdiction. The 20 something pages these lawyers filed in a response
[13:11.860 --> 13:18.660]  just argued a bunch of stuff that just like in Tina's case, they argued a bunch of stuff that
[13:18.660 --> 13:26.340]  was not before the court. And, you know, you were concerned about us doing a rebuttal to their answer.
[13:27.940 --> 13:34.420]  And I said, no, their answer is so stupid. There's nothing in there that matters. It does not
[13:34.420 --> 13:42.740]  deserve a response. And if we responded to that, all we would do is insult the intelligence of
[13:42.740 --> 13:49.380]  the court of appeals. And they've looked at our documents and it will be clear to them that we
[13:49.380 --> 13:59.300]  chose not to respond. There's a pleading. There's an answer that you can file a rebuttal to the
[13:59.300 --> 14:10.660]  answer. We filed an appeal. They filed a response to the appeal. We could have filed a rebuttal to
[14:10.660 --> 14:20.980]  their response. But the response was so incompetent that it did not warrant a rebuttal. And I don't
[14:20.980 --> 14:30.100]  think that will be lost on the court. Okay. And so the appeals court has more of a,
[14:32.420 --> 14:39.780]  how can I say this, integrity. Because I've heard you and Eddie and several others say that
[14:39.780 --> 14:45.620]  the lower courts always make you do the motion. So you just got the record.
[14:45.620 --> 14:56.820]  I hate to say integrity. It's not really like that. What they do is they have an interest
[14:56.820 --> 15:06.180]  in the Corpus Juris, in the body of law. Any ruling they make, other lawyers can take those
[15:06.180 --> 15:13.860]  rulings and use them. So if they're trying to screw a client, they got to be careful about
[15:13.860 --> 15:21.780]  the rulings that they make, because they might render a ruling that other lawyers can use to
[15:22.420 --> 15:30.100]  screw up the very guys that are paying them. So this appeal will be on the book for all time?
[15:30.900 --> 15:40.500]  Oh yeah. Okay. And if you, it's hard to imagine how they could not rule in your favor because
[15:40.500 --> 15:45.860]  they've already ruled that the original trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction.
[15:47.060 --> 15:54.340]  I just, that takes down everything. If they change that, then they completely undermine
[15:55.380 --> 16:01.540]  the whole structure of jurisdiction in the state of Texas. I don't see them doing that.
[16:02.980 --> 16:08.580]  The only thing that had me worried was that the attorney's argument is solely based on
[16:08.580 --> 16:13.940]  suing the city and its employees at the same time, which voids it all.
[16:14.580 --> 16:22.420]  Okay. About to go to break. I will talk to that when we come back. When we wrote the counter
[16:22.420 --> 16:34.020]  complaint, that was very clearly in mind. I knew that argument would come and wrote this document
[16:34.020 --> 16:41.940]  to avoid that argument because we sued them in their private capacity claiming they did not
[16:41.940 --> 16:48.020]  have official capacity and the court of appeals has already ruled that. Hang on.
[16:48.580 --> 16:53.940]  Going to break. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio. We'll be right back.
[16:53.940 --> 17:05.380]  Rural law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[17:05.380 --> 17:09.220]  we live in an us against them society. If we, the people are ever going to have a free society,
[17:09.220 --> 17:13.300]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[17:13.300 --> 17:17.300]  travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[17:17.300 --> 17:21.940]  the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn
[17:21.940 --> 17:26.420]  how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former sheriff's deputy, A. Craig,
[17:26.420 --> 17:30.020]  in conjunction with rule of law radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool
[17:30.020 --> 17:34.020]  available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule
[17:34.020 --> 17:38.580]  of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[17:38.580 --> 17:41.940]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[17:41.940 --> 17:46.500]  the Texas Transportation Code, the law versus the lie, video and audio of the original 2009
[17:46.500 --> 17:50.740]  seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for
[17:50.740 --> 17:54.980]  your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and
[17:54.980 --> 18:02.020]  together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. Are you being harassed by
[18:02.020 --> 18:07.540]  debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the
[18:07.540 --> 18:13.220]  Michael Maris proven method. Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors
[18:13.220 --> 18:18.500]  and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win
[18:18.500 --> 18:24.260]  in court using federal civil rights statute. What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court
[18:24.260 --> 18:28.900]  summons. How to answer letters and phone calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit
[18:28.900 --> 18:34.660]  report. How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael
[18:34.660 --> 18:40.340]  Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is
[18:40.340 --> 18:45.780]  available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue
[18:45.780 --> 18:52.900]  Michael Maris banner or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email
[18:52.900 --> 19:00.020]  m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com. To learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:00.020 --> 19:08.500]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:12.660 --> 19:18.260]  Well, don't let nothing get to you. Only the father can do it by you. So don't let
[19:18.260 --> 19:26.100]  bad-mine people hurt you until they can get behind you. You know what I mean? My friend,
[19:26.100 --> 19:33.780]  now I've got you in the club. Don't spin behind me, pretty. Get in your problem, baby.
[19:37.860 --> 19:45.300]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Tim in Texas.
[19:47.460 --> 19:53.380]  Okay, I think, you know, this sounds like they're setting up to give you the rule and you want.
[19:53.380 --> 20:02.420]  If they don't give you the ruling you want, then they will disrupt the Corpus Juris.
[20:03.540 --> 20:13.380]  And when I write pleadings, I'm always looking for arguments to make where, if the court rules
[20:13.380 --> 20:22.500]  against us, they disrupt the Corpus Juris. It's not enough just to look for legal arguments that
[20:22.500 --> 20:28.980]  are valid because the courts are corrupt. So you have to understand where the court lives.
[20:30.180 --> 20:38.900]  Court of Appeals must maintain the integrity of the Corpus Juris. Now I maintain that they're
[20:38.900 --> 20:45.300]  all corrupt and all of these rights and privileges written into the law were not written into the
[20:45.300 --> 20:52.260]  law for you and I or you and me. They were written into the law for these no good rotten
[20:52.260 --> 20:59.300]  corrupt scoundrels. The problem is, is they're sharks and they're swimming around in a pool full
[20:59.300 --> 21:04.740]  of sharks and they need tools to protect themselves from the other sharks in the pool.
[21:06.900 --> 21:14.260]  And the fallout of that is that you and I get to use the protections they put in
[21:14.260 --> 21:23.060]  to protect themselves from each other. We get to use them ourselves. So when we write an argument,
[21:23.060 --> 21:32.900]  we need to look at what argument can I make such that if they rule against me in the court of
[21:32.900 --> 21:45.380]  appeals, it will create case law that screws up the body of law. We have said that since the
[21:46.340 --> 21:55.060]  trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, then jurisdiction cannot be transferred to anyone
[21:55.060 --> 22:06.180]  else. If the court of appeals rules against that, that completely disrupts 200 years of well
[22:06.980 --> 22:14.100]  established law or in Texas 150 years of well established law, they're not going to do that.
[22:14.100 --> 22:26.500]  Not just to favor some po-dunk chump municipality in who knows where Texas,
[22:28.980 --> 22:34.180]  they're not going to do that. Now, if it were some really big deal case
[22:36.020 --> 22:42.900]  with real serious political ramifications, they might get bought off, but they would immediately
[22:42.900 --> 22:50.980]  already have another case in the in the wings they could use to undo that bogus ruling.
[22:53.460 --> 22:58.980]  But you're not big enough. You're not important enough to go through those kinds of maneuvers.
[22:59.780 --> 23:05.940]  The city's lawyers and the city itself are not important enough for the court of appeals to even
[23:05.940 --> 23:14.420]  care. So not because they're good guys, not because they're not corrupt, but just because
[23:15.780 --> 23:23.380]  of where this group of judges lives, the likelihood they would be is they will rule in your favor.
[23:26.500 --> 23:31.700]  So when you said the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction, you're saying
[23:31.700 --> 23:40.900]  from the get go from the very beginning? Exactly. Well, okay, not exactly.
[23:42.340 --> 23:50.420]  Judge Evans, the original judge in the criminal prosecution had subject matter jurisdiction.
[23:50.420 --> 24:02.260]  But when he allowed the administrative hearing, that hearing and all the persons involved in the
[24:02.260 --> 24:09.460]  panel did not have subject matter jurisdiction. It was lost at that point. The visiting judge,
[24:09.460 --> 24:16.100]  you meant? No, I'm talking about the original trial court. You went to you were called to court
[24:16.100 --> 24:23.780]  to answer a criminal accusation. Yes, that was a judge's mentor. But the prosecutor converted it
[24:23.780 --> 24:32.660]  into a civil prosecution. Right. The trial judge in the criminal case had subject matter jurisdiction.
[24:32.660 --> 24:41.220]  That was undisputable. Okay. But when the trial court allowed an administrative hearing,
[24:41.220 --> 24:49.460]  the administrative hearing never accrued jurisdiction. Right. And that was the argument.
[24:49.460 --> 24:58.420]  We never argued that the original judge did not have jurisdiction. We argued that the civil
[25:01.300 --> 25:07.940]  proceeding that followed that the judge allowed that proceeding lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
[25:07.940 --> 25:14.420]  Now, we argued it for one reason, but the court of appeals never got to our reason.
[25:16.180 --> 25:24.020]  They first looked at generic jurisdiction and said, okay, you were supposed to have this filing
[25:24.020 --> 25:32.660]  in the record. You don't have it. We don't get to whether or not a trial, a criminal court judge can
[25:32.660 --> 25:41.380]  move a case to a civil proceeding. That was an argument. They couldn't do that. The court never
[25:41.380 --> 25:49.460]  got that far. This court, they got to the point where can the city have a civil hearing in the
[25:49.460 --> 25:54.980]  first place? And they said, no, so we don't need to go any further. They don't have jurisdiction.
[25:54.980 --> 26:03.460]  Period. So you got that one. They cannot get past it. And that is resjudicata. So we've been
[26:04.340 --> 26:14.260]  adjudicated and this court will not change it. So that mandamus, you know, when you got the
[26:14.260 --> 26:27.620]  ruling in the mandamus, remember, I said, this is really a big deal. Yeah, it was. Because I doubt
[26:27.620 --> 26:35.620]  that any pro se litigant in the second circuit in state of Texas has ever had a mandamus
[26:35.620 --> 26:46.020]  granted in their favor. You may be the only one. 12% all the 12% of the mandamus is filed,
[26:46.660 --> 26:53.860]  get tossed. They don't get accepted. Of those 12%, 2% get ruled in favor of the filer.
[26:55.940 --> 26:58.980]  And you're a pro se filer and they ruled in your favor.
[26:58.980 --> 27:03.700]  Almost couldn't believe it when you got the ruling down.
[27:05.620 --> 27:12.260]  They actually gave it to you in your favor. Well, they did their homework, didn't they?
[27:13.220 --> 27:16.740]  Yeah, so that's in the court. That's in the record. They can't revisit that.
[27:16.740 --> 27:31.220]  And there is no way jurisdiction can accrue past that. Well, I've also tried to, I've been wondering,
[27:31.220 --> 27:42.100]  why, who was it that convinced this stubborn council that was not going to let me go,
[27:42.100 --> 27:49.540]  that we're not going to dismiss anything? Who convinced them? Could it have been
[27:49.540 --> 27:57.700]  their own attorney saying, if you just go ahead and drop this, maybe he will just go away?
[27:59.700 --> 28:04.260]  In other words, they were predicting themselves. We were at a hearing. You weren't at this
[28:04.260 --> 28:11.620]  here at this council meeting where one of the council members was trying to mediate between
[28:12.580 --> 28:19.620]  you and the council. Oh, you were there. You were there. That's right. You and Laura were there.
[28:19.620 --> 28:26.420]  And he's trying to mediate. And I felt for him because when he come out, everybody outside is
[28:26.420 --> 28:37.300]  really crawling down his throat. And he was kind of standing in the middle. And I suggested to him
[28:38.900 --> 28:48.180]  that why don't you ask the council to seek a third party opinion, because we've made
[28:48.180 --> 28:55.860]  accusations against the lawyers who have accused him of baritry. And they pretty well know we're
[28:55.860 --> 29:02.820]  likely to sue them. So they have a dog in this hunt. Why don't you get a third party council
[29:02.820 --> 29:09.540]  that doesn't have a dog in this hunt and have that council look at it? And I almost bet you
[29:09.540 --> 29:16.660]  they did that. And another lawyer came in and looked at this and said, are you guys out of your mind?
[29:17.380 --> 29:22.580]  This guy is going to clean your clock. That's when they dismissed everything
[29:22.580 --> 29:28.740]  and the hope that you would go away. And effectively you have, you gave them your word.
[29:29.860 --> 29:35.620]  Yeah, they stood by theirs and you'll stand by yours. You just want to make sure that they
[29:35.620 --> 29:41.700]  don't get a secondary shot at you. Yeah, I still have the idea, though, that their own attorneys
[29:43.300 --> 29:46.500]  may have said, in other words, we got nothing to lose.
[29:46.500 --> 29:52.580]  That's why they go ahead and dismiss it. And then that way maybe he will.
[29:52.580 --> 29:58.020]  Okay, okay, hang on. Going to break Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll roll radio. We'll be right back.
[30:02.100 --> 30:07.540]  Europeans take long stress-free vacations, but Americans have a tough time unplugging from
[30:07.540 --> 30:13.140]  their jobs. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with a new study that measures how much Americans work
[30:13.140 --> 30:19.540]  when they should be resting after this. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about
[30:19.540 --> 30:24.900]  yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms
[30:24.900 --> 30:30.980]  will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information
[30:30.980 --> 30:37.540]  to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by startpage.com,
[30:37.540 --> 30:43.540]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with start page.
[30:45.540 --> 30:50.820]  Do you want to get away from it all? I mean really get away from it all, but too often find you can't?
[30:50.820 --> 30:55.860]  Join the club. A new survey finds an increasing number of professionals and the majority of
[30:55.860 --> 31:01.780]  Americans admit they actually work on vacation. That's bad for a whole host of reasons, your
[31:01.780 --> 31:07.140]  physical and mental well-being topping the list. Some experts say if you're totally tethered to
[31:07.140 --> 31:13.140]  your mobile devices, at least pick a time of day to respond to work. Answer only those emails that
[31:13.140 --> 31:20.500]  ask for your input and keep your replies short and sweet. My advice is to unplug, unplug, unplug
[31:20.500 --> 31:26.100]  and get some much needed rest. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most
[31:26.100 --> 31:36.100]  private search engine. I lost my son. My nephew. My uncle. My son. On September 11th, 2000. Most
[31:36.100 --> 31:41.780]  people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story
[31:41.780 --> 31:46.740]  skyscraper was not hit by a plane. Although the official explanation is that fire brought down
[31:46.740 --> 31:52.020]  building 7. Over 1200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there
[31:52.020 --> 31:58.580]  is more to the story. Bring justice to my son. My uncle. My nephew. My son. Go to building what.org.
[31:58.580 --> 32:03.300]  Why it fell. Why it matters. As what you can do. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home
[32:03.300 --> 32:07.220]  Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on,
[32:07.220 --> 32:11.140]  we all know the government caused it with their chem trails, but good luck getting them to pay
[32:11.140 --> 32:15.220]  for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chem trails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's
[32:15.220 --> 32:19.540]  why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with
[32:19.540 --> 32:24.820]  little to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the
[32:24.820 --> 32:29.700]  Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle
[32:29.700 --> 32:37.700]  your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to Hill Country
[32:37.700 --> 32:42.820]  Home Improvements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off. And we'll donate another $100
[32:42.820 --> 32:48.180]  to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. So if those out-of-town roofers come
[32:48.180 --> 32:57.140]  knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745 or Hill Country Home Improvements.com.
[32:57.140 --> 33:01.540]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean, I actually be kidding about chem trails.
[33:27.460 --> 33:42.020]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruel Valrillo, and we're talking to Tim in Texas.
[33:42.820 --> 33:50.420]  Okay, Tim, have we about exhausted this issue or do you have something else?
[33:50.420 --> 34:00.180]  No, just hoping that they rule in our favor. Yeah, I'm pretty confident. I don't like to
[34:00.180 --> 34:08.020]  get confident. But from the documents that they requested, they requested only documents that
[34:08.020 --> 34:14.260]  went to subject matter jurisdiction. All that 20 pages of garbage, the other side argued,
[34:14.260 --> 34:22.740]  doesn't go to the documents they asked to see. So it looks as though they're focusing on the
[34:22.740 --> 34:29.700]  only issue in the court. And if they do, I think you'll get an easy win.
[34:30.660 --> 34:34.660]  What I'm going to tell you is this last thing here is signed by the Judge,
[34:34.660 --> 34:44.340]  District Judge, was August 21st, 2018, and it had those pages, those papers in those
[34:44.340 --> 34:48.500]  defendants' original answer, pleaded jurisdiction, conviction, and the counterclaim,
[34:50.180 --> 34:55.700]  counter-defendants' motion to dismiss, the counter-claimants' motion to recusal. So it's
[34:55.700 --> 35:02.820]  all in there. So I guess trying to put it together to see how the district judge got to where
[35:02.820 --> 35:13.300]  he, I don't know. It's all in there. Yeah, so, you know, I think it's going to be pretty clear.
[35:14.500 --> 35:22.260]  Okay. All right, sir. Okay, you guys have a good evening. Thank you, Tim. Now we're going to go
[35:22.260 --> 35:33.220]  to Adam in Texas. Hello, Adam. Hey, Randy. How you doing? Doing good. What are you up to today? Well,
[35:33.220 --> 35:39.540]  I got some good news. To talk to you, Brett. I guess Brett's still on the line. He's still there.
[35:41.460 --> 35:46.260]  Yes, sir. I'm here. Great. Yeah, I talked to y'all a couple weeks ago.
[35:46.260 --> 35:53.460]  Kindle County, they were messing with my wife, and I did some public information requests,
[35:54.500 --> 36:04.260]  and I got some responses back. And as far as the Commissioner's Court, the county judge wrote
[36:04.260 --> 36:09.860]  me a letter back, and he said he had no records responses to my request. That means that Kindle
[36:09.860 --> 36:16.260]  County doesn't have any appointed traffic control officers in that county under 701-001
[36:16.260 --> 36:25.780]  transportation code. And then I got back a reply response from the Kindle County
[36:25.780 --> 36:38.340]  Court Clerk, and my request was under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 18.01b, and I was asking for
[36:40.500 --> 36:48.660]  any and all supporting verified affidavits that supporting any search warrants issued in the
[36:48.660 --> 36:55.140]  county by any magistrate from January 1st to July 1st. And I got back a response from the
[36:55.140 --> 37:06.900]  county clerk, and she had no records responses to my request. So under Texas Government Code,
[37:07.780 --> 37:16.980]  24.591c, which 24.59 created the 451st Judicial District, which is in Kindle County because
[37:16.980 --> 37:22.900]  they got rid of the county court law a couple years ago, created the 451st Judicial District.
[37:22.900 --> 37:30.820]  The government code 24.491c says all civil and criminal matters within the current jurisdiction
[37:30.820 --> 37:36.340]  of the county and district courts must be filed with the county clerk's office and the county court.
[37:36.340 --> 37:41.940]  This is for Kindle County only. The county clerk serves as the clerk of the district court for
[37:41.940 --> 37:49.780]  those matters. So what we have is we have a blood warrant that was issued on my wife
[37:49.780 --> 38:00.900]  by the district judge, and there's no supporting affidavit filed on record as required by law
[38:00.900 --> 38:10.100]  out of the Chapter 18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So what's my cause of action? That's
[38:10.100 --> 38:16.900]  what I'm talking about. Who was required to file those affidavits in the record? The judge
[38:16.900 --> 38:24.420]  who issued the warrant and received them or the officers who generated them?
[38:25.940 --> 38:34.260]  Well, the officer that filed for the blood warrant, they were supposed to, by the law,
[38:34.260 --> 38:39.300]  they were supposed to file with it in order to get the warrant. They were supposed to have
[38:40.180 --> 38:46.580]  a verified affidavit. That's how you get the warrant. I got that. But what I'm doing is
[38:46.580 --> 38:56.740]  tracking where did the documents go. In order for the judge to issue the warrant, the judge would
[38:56.740 --> 39:06.980]  have necessarily had to have had the affidavits. So the officers would have given the affidavits
[39:06.980 --> 39:17.140]  to the judge, and then the judge was directed to file them and the clerk. Judge for tampering
[39:17.140 --> 39:23.220]  with the government document. Okay, tampering with the government document on the district judge.
[39:24.260 --> 39:33.060]  The presumption, this is under the presumption that the judge actually received these affidavits
[39:33.060 --> 39:39.940]  as required so that he would have jurisdiction for the purpose of issuing the warrant.
[39:41.060 --> 39:48.420]  So you presume that he had them. And since the clerk doesn't have them, the only reasonable
[39:48.420 --> 39:56.100]  presumption is that he secreted them from the clerk. He must have. Then you sting the judge.
[39:56.100 --> 40:03.300]  The only way the judge can get out from under tampering with a government document is to admit
[40:03.300 --> 40:10.660]  that he never had them in the first place. The legal term for that is rock and hard place.
[40:15.060 --> 40:20.420]  Well, yeah, I'm going to speak with the district judge, but I also want to hear this
[40:20.420 --> 40:27.780]  towards the arresting officer because my fear is that the arrest. Okay, here's the deal.
[40:29.380 --> 40:36.100]  The judge will have to produce them. If he cannot produce them,
[40:37.380 --> 40:43.780]  then it goes back to the arresting officers. The judge and the arresting officers conspired one
[40:43.780 --> 40:53.220]  with the other to deprive your wife and due process. That's my angle, yeah. So
[40:54.580 --> 40:59.620]  what I believe happened is what we have here is we have an illegally issued search warrant.
[41:02.180 --> 41:07.940]  Have you filed first degree felony aggravated assault charges against the arresting officers?
[41:07.940 --> 41:19.140]  Not yet. No, that's because you have the response from the county commissioners
[41:19.140 --> 41:28.580]  court. Now you have reasonable probable cause to believe that these particular sheriff's deputies
[41:28.580 --> 41:39.220]  were not certified, were not authorized to act in the capacity of a police officer.
[41:40.180 --> 41:43.140]  Correct, out of subtitle C, text trans bitch go correct.
[41:44.580 --> 41:51.220]  They were only authorized to act as a peace officer and when they turned those lights on
[41:51.220 --> 41:59.380]  your wife, they stepped across that line. Did I tell you about the last time I got a ticket in Texas?
[42:00.980 --> 42:08.740]  No, sir. This was Tim's case. I was coming, they were having a hearing and they knew I was going
[42:08.740 --> 42:18.260]  to show up. So I'm driving over there and I turned off of a road from the town I live in
[42:18.260 --> 42:27.540]  and on to another road. From a little side road, Bobo's crossing on to 730. I want to turn
[42:27.540 --> 42:33.380]  on to Bobo's crossing. There's a sheriff's deputy in front of me and I followed him. He turned down
[42:33.380 --> 42:38.820]  730 toward Newark and I turned behind him. I kept a distance behind him because I was
[42:39.700 --> 42:45.140]  uncomfortable. Something, you know, sometimes something tells you this is not right.
[42:45.140 --> 42:51.780]  Well, when we got into Newark, there was a little road that veered off to the right
[42:52.820 --> 42:58.820]  that went down to Tim's house. He took that road. I said, I don't want to follow him down there. So
[42:58.820 --> 43:04.420]  I went down through town and come back to Tim's house from the other direction and there's that
[43:04.420 --> 43:11.700]  sheriff's deputy sitting waiting for me. Turned his lights on. I pull over. He comes up. I give
[43:11.700 --> 43:20.260]  him my license because I signed a contract with the state agreeing to do that. And he said,
[43:20.260 --> 43:24.020]  do you know why I stopped here? I said, no, but I'm sure you're going to tell me,
[43:24.020 --> 43:31.540]  well, Mr. Kelton, your registration is expired. I said, only two years. What's the problem?
[43:32.980 --> 43:40.340]  Well, hang on. We'll finish this on the other side. I got 20 seconds. He went back and right to
[43:40.340 --> 43:44.740]  take it. I'll call 911. I won't even rest it for a first-degree phone and aggravated assault.
[43:45.620 --> 43:49.620]  And it got real interesting from there. We'll be right back. Randy Kelton,
[43:49.620 --> 43:52.980]  Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[44:01.140 --> 44:04.980]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by
[44:04.980 --> 44:09.060]  delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:09.060 --> 44:12.820]  We provide a wide assortment of our favorite products featuring a great selection of high
[44:12.820 --> 44:16.500]  quality coins and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting,
[44:16.500 --> 44:20.820]  as well as large transactions for investors. We believe in educating our customers with
[44:20.820 --> 44:25.540]  resources from top accredited metal dealers and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking
[44:25.540 --> 44:30.580]  for, we can find it. In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond
[44:30.580 --> 44:35.620]  Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burks. We also offer one-world way, Mountain House Storeable Foods,
[44:35.620 --> 44:41.060]  Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale and more. We broker Metal's IRA accounts
[44:41.060 --> 44:48.660]  and we also accept big coins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6440. We're located at 7304 Burnett
[44:48.660 --> 44:53.380]  Road, 3A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6,
[44:53.380 --> 44:59.540]  Saturdays, 10 to 2. Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[44:59.540 --> 45:07.540]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.540 --> 45:14.020]  the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[45:14.020 --> 45:20.820]  step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[45:20.820 --> 45:26.100]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course,
[45:26.100 --> 45:31.140]  and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[45:31.140 --> 45:37.380]  with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what
[45:37.380 --> 45:43.460]  everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.460 --> 45:49.700]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.700 --> 45:56.500]  prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[45:56.500 --> 46:22.500]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:26.500 --> 46:39.620]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brent Felton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Adam in Texas.
[46:40.260 --> 46:46.260]  Okay, the officer tells me that my registration's expired. I say only two years. What's the problem?
[46:47.060 --> 46:51.940]  He goes back to write a ticket. I call 9-1-1. I want him arrested for first-degree felony
[46:51.940 --> 46:56.900]  aggravated assault. Now, Brett's looking up the statute to make sure I got the number right.
[46:57.860 --> 47:08.340]  The only statute that requires a driver or a operator to pull over when an officer turns
[47:08.340 --> 47:15.780]  on his emergency lights behind them is in the transportation code, and I believe it's 353.345,
[47:15.780 --> 47:24.500]  but Brett's checking. Not that, but I don't see yet where it does say that. Okay, I've got it in
[47:24.500 --> 47:31.700]  one of the pleadings that's on the traffic side. There's only one statute, and that's under transportation
[47:31.700 --> 47:36.180]  code. Well, this guy turned his lights on me with the intent that I pulled over, so when I pulled
[47:36.180 --> 47:42.260]  over, he pulled in behind me. He didn't go around me to respond to an emergency. He intended that I
[47:42.260 --> 47:48.820]  pulled over, but he can only do that under transportation code. However, I had already
[47:48.820 --> 47:57.380]  checked with the county commissioner's court, and there were no sheriff's deputies authorized by
[47:57.380 --> 48:06.340]  the county commissioner's court to act as traffic control officers. So I had reason to believe that
[48:06.340 --> 48:13.700]  he was not a proper traffic control officer. Therefore, he had exerted or purported to exert
[48:13.700 --> 48:20.580]  an authority he did not have, and in the process, he arrested my freedom of movement
[48:22.980 --> 48:31.060]  and did so while permanently displaying a dead weapon. I considered the arrest of the lights
[48:31.060 --> 48:39.540]  as a threat to my person, because I can be relatively sure that if I'd ignored them,
[48:39.540 --> 48:47.460]  I would wind up being shot at, or maybe worse, actually shot, but he was certainly willing
[48:47.460 --> 48:53.860]  to use whatever force was necessary to force me to stop. So I felt threatened.
[48:53.860 --> 49:04.740]  2201 Texas Penal Code calls that simple assault. If you commit simple assault while acting under
[49:04.740 --> 49:14.420]  the color or pretense of an official capacity, that is a felony of the second degree. Unless
[49:14.420 --> 49:22.740]  you are a public official acting under the color or pretense of an official capacity,
[49:22.740 --> 49:31.140]  in which case it is a felony of the first degree. When our legislators put pistols on our officers'
[49:31.140 --> 49:41.860]  hips, they put a tremendous responsibility on them. They said, this is a really, really big deal.
[49:41.860 --> 49:53.060]  Don't screw it up. So don't blame me, guys. I didn't like the code. I just read it. Brett,
[49:53.060 --> 50:02.020]  did you find it? No, I haven't seen something like that just yet. Try 353. No, it's not in there.
[50:02.020 --> 50:12.980]  Are y'all talking about 543 under this subtitle? Well, what really is looking for is the
[50:13.620 --> 50:20.820]  authorization. When somebody flips on their light bar, they are authorized to pull you over
[50:20.820 --> 50:27.540]  by the transportation code. There's only one statute that requires you to pull over and stop
[50:27.540 --> 50:33.620]  when an officer turns his light bar on behind you. That's in the transportation code. I was
[50:33.620 --> 50:44.260]  thinking it was 345 or 353. I keep thinking 353, but apparently that's not the right one.
[50:44.900 --> 50:50.980]  It is in one of my pleadings. I believe it's in my subject matter jurisdiction challenge
[50:50.980 --> 50:57.940]  that's on the ticket site. But there's only one statute in that there's nothing in the penal code
[50:58.820 --> 51:03.940]  that requires you to pull over and stop when an officer turns his lights on behind you.
[51:05.140 --> 51:12.580]  And in fact, that's a crime on his part. If you look in the penal code, it shows that there's a
[51:12.580 --> 51:23.780]  crime. It's in 4206 and it's subsection A, subsection 2, false alarm. If he knew there was no emergency
[51:23.780 --> 51:31.540]  and he used his light bar to indicate the existence of an emergency, and if that would ordinarily
[51:31.540 --> 51:37.940]  place a person in fear of imminent serious bodily injury, he has committed that class A
[51:37.940 --> 51:48.500]  misdemeanor or state jail felony. So I wanted that piece too. I was driving down Highway 287
[51:48.500 --> 51:54.180]  north of Fort Worth and a car come up behind me and emergency lights come on. I moved over.
[51:55.460 --> 52:02.500]  It passed me and the lights went off. At Rome, Texas, he pulled off the highway to get, I get
[52:02.500 --> 52:10.020]  to get gas and I pulled in behind him and I asked him for ID and he said, what's the problem?
[52:10.660 --> 52:17.140]  See, you turned your lights on behind me and right away he said, oh, I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
[52:18.180 --> 52:23.700]  I'm in my patrol cruiser when I got my five-year-old with me and the kids sitting there
[52:24.580 --> 52:29.940]  and he turned them on. I didn't realize they were on when I did. I turned them off.
[52:29.940 --> 52:36.900]  But the guy was sorry all over the place, but he recognized the difficulty that put him in.
[52:38.820 --> 52:45.140]  So they know better. I accused the fire department of doing that to get me out of
[52:45.140 --> 52:52.660]  the way so they could get to the donut shop. They didn't find me as funny as I did.
[52:52.660 --> 53:02.580]  Anyway, okay. That was my position that he arrested my freedom of movement
[53:04.660 --> 53:11.300]  and did so with the implied threat that if I did not respond to those lights
[53:12.020 --> 53:18.340]  that he was prepared to use force. He was prepared to use deadly force and that is not an unreasonable
[53:18.340 --> 53:26.900]  presumption. So I consider that an act of simple assault at least 2201 Texas Penal Code.
[53:28.740 --> 53:36.660]  And 2201 Texas Penal Code says that if you, I'm sorry, 2202 says that if you commit
[53:36.660 --> 53:43.620]  simple assault as defined by 2201 and you are prominently displaying a deadly weapon,
[53:43.620 --> 53:51.060]  that's felony of the second degree unless you are a public official acting under the color
[53:51.060 --> 53:56.740]  pretence of an official capacity, in which case felony of the first degree. I filed first degree
[53:56.740 --> 54:04.980]  felony aggravated assault charges against the officer. To say that he was not a happy camper
[54:04.980 --> 54:15.140]  is a gross understatement. He came back with my ticket and another deputy had shown up and
[54:15.140 --> 54:20.820]  he's on the passenger side. I'm talking him through the window and he implied that he was,
[54:21.540 --> 54:29.380]  could arrest me for making a false 911 call. I said, what are you talking about? This guy committed
[54:29.380 --> 54:37.700]  first degree felony aggravated assault. You don't consider that an emergency? The officer
[54:37.700 --> 54:43.700]  come back with my ticket. He handed it to me and I couldn't find a pen so he gave me his pen.
[54:44.660 --> 54:50.020]  And I'm talking to the officer on the other side and yakking back and forth. I'll sign the ticket
[54:50.020 --> 54:58.420]  and give it back to him. And this is officer standing there fuming and then he says, give me
[54:58.420 --> 55:05.780]  my pen. And I held it up and looked at it. I looked at the other officer and I said,
[55:06.500 --> 55:11.700]  heck, I thought I was going to get away with that. It turned and handed it to him.
[55:13.140 --> 55:20.900]  You just had to be there. You have not had fun until you've done that to an officer.
[55:20.900 --> 55:28.580]  And we talked earlier in the show about setting these guys up so you can sting them.
[55:30.500 --> 55:33.860]  When a sheriff's deputy pulls you over, he sets himself up.
[55:33.860 --> 55:48.020]  And you can sting him. Adam, you there? Yeah, I'm here. Okay, this would be great fun.
[55:51.380 --> 56:00.740]  What do you want to do with this, Adam? I want it. Well, by law, okay?
[56:00.740 --> 56:06.020]  By law, there's supposed to be a verified supporting affidavit for the search warrant
[56:06.020 --> 56:11.700]  on file with the county clerk's office by law. It's not there. County clerk says it's not there.
[56:12.260 --> 56:17.940]  Well, that makes the fact that they took my wife, chained her to a hospital bed and drew her blood
[56:17.940 --> 56:23.300]  against her will. That makes that aggravated assault. Because the law says that you have
[56:23.300 --> 56:29.940]  to have a verified supporting affidavit for each every search warrant issued. So I want answers
[56:29.940 --> 56:38.180]  and I want to know the reason I asked that question is what you want at the end of the day
[56:39.220 --> 56:46.660]  will determine how you go about what you're doing. I want the officer to never work in
[56:46.660 --> 56:55.220]  law enforcement again. And I want to give the district judge the political turmoil of her career.
[56:55.220 --> 57:01.860]  Okay, that's different than suing them, getting them to pay you a lot of money to go away and
[57:01.860 --> 57:07.700]  leave alone. And that's why I asked that question. I would also like to sue them. That's why I called
[57:07.700 --> 57:13.060]  in because I've been looking in the O'Connor's, Texas 2009. I know it's a little old, but it'll
[57:13.060 --> 57:17.860]  change much though. O'Connor's, Texas causes of action. I'm trying to find my cause of action
[57:18.500 --> 57:25.140]  because I want to initiate my first suit against these. Send me an email and I will send you O'Connor
[57:25.140 --> 57:40.260] 's 2008 on disk or electronic format. Okay. And if my database guy gets this done, he has taken
[57:40.900 --> 57:50.820]  O'Connor's and ran a, we're running an AI engine on it, where we're breaking all of these forms
[57:50.820 --> 58:01.860]  down into their component parts. And, you know, in O'Connor's forms, they will have a page with,
[58:03.140 --> 58:08.500]  say, jurisdiction. They will have about five paragraphs for jurisdiction. And they tell you,
[58:08.500 --> 58:15.540]  pick the one that fits your situation. And then you delete the rest of them. But what we're doing
[58:15.540 --> 58:21.780]  is we're taking each of these paragraphs and putting them in the database. And then we're
[58:21.780 --> 58:29.300]  looking at the paragraph and saying, okay, what questions would we have to ask to determine that
[58:29.300 --> 58:35.620]  this is the appropriate paragraph? And when we determine that this is the appropriate paragraph,
[58:36.500 --> 58:42.980]  what information do we need to ask for so that we can fill in all the blanks within the paragraph?
[58:42.980 --> 58:52.980]  We'll do that for each issue. Paul is about, would you like to make more definite progress in your
[58:52.980 --> 58:59.620]  walk with God? Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books
[58:59.620 --> 59:04.500]  that can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study
[59:04.500 --> 59:10.020]  Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:10.020 --> 59:16.020]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three volume set called
[59:16.020 --> 59:21.460]  basic elements of the Christian life. Chapter by chapter, basic elements of the Christian life
[59:21.460 --> 59:28.340]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order
[59:28.340 --> 59:34.900]  your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the Christian life, call Bibles for
[59:34.900 --> 59:49.140]  America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:52.180 --> 59:58.340]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[59:58.340 --> 01:00:04.500]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns.
[01:00:06.340 --> 01:00:12.980]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[01:00:12.980 --> 01:00:20.820]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.820 --> 01:00:29.140]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and crypto is an order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.140 --> 01:00:41.460]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:41.460 --> 01:00:51.700]  Today in History, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb,
[01:00:51.700 --> 01:00:57.460]  was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[01:00:57.460 --> 01:01:00.340]  killing 10 and injuring 40. Today in History.
[01:01:04.500 --> 01:01:08.500]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325,
[01:01:08.500 --> 01:01:12.660]  legalizing hemp into Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state,
[01:01:12.660 --> 01:01:16.980]  including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges,
[01:01:16.980 --> 01:01:21.460]  and even refusing to file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time
[01:01:21.460 --> 01:01:26.420]  or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County
[01:01:26.420 --> 01:01:30.580]  District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession
[01:01:30.580 --> 01:01:35.380]  and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials,
[01:01:35.380 --> 01:01:39.380]  including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on
[01:01:39.380 --> 01:01:44.420]  Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas, and that these actions demonstrate
[01:01:44.420 --> 01:01:51.060]  a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney
[01:01:51.060 --> 01:01:57.060]  in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law,
[01:01:57.060 --> 01:02:01.780]  quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.780 --> 01:02:06.740]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[01:02:06.740 --> 01:02:10.820]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[01:02:10.820 --> 01:02:15.300]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with
[01:02:15.300 --> 01:02:24.660]  something, the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified
[01:02:24.660 --> 01:02:30.020]  a five and a half inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico,
[01:02:30.020 --> 01:02:35.540]  the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[01:02:35.540 --> 01:02:40.820]  being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the
[01:02:40.820 --> 01:02:47.700]  shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to
[01:02:47.700 --> 01:03:00.740]  lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This is Wolf Roadie with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:17.780 --> 01:03:22.740]  I am a long boy, you know that?
[01:03:22.740 --> 01:03:33.620]  I will lie by my father's house until he returns. I will lie by my daughter's house until he returns.
[01:03:33.620 --> 01:04:01.720]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett, Fountain, Willow Law Radio.
[01:04:01.720 --> 01:04:07.380]  My tangy is getting tangled, and we're talking to Adam in Texas.
[01:04:07.380 --> 01:04:17.040]  Okay, Adam, I was just talking to Brett on the break, and I've been doing this show for
[01:04:17.040 --> 01:04:27.380]  quite a while now, and in the process of doing this show, I'm looking for a group of people
[01:04:27.380 --> 01:04:34.440]  we can bring together that can implement some practices and procedures that will change
[01:04:34.440 --> 01:04:38.940]  everything.
[01:04:38.940 --> 01:04:41.440]  Brett is one.
[01:04:41.440 --> 01:04:46.440]  Brett and I have a history, he's kind of pee-overed at me about something, and...
[01:04:46.440 --> 01:04:51.600]  Well, don't put words in my mouth, that's not what I'm saying.
[01:04:51.600 --> 01:04:54.520]  We had disagreement, but I'm not letting him go.
[01:04:54.520 --> 01:05:01.640]  When I first talked to Brett, I talked to Brett about programming, but he's proved
[01:05:01.640 --> 01:05:10.440]  himself of far greater value somewhere else, the same place that you, Adam, have proved
[01:05:10.440 --> 01:05:12.960]  yourself of value.
[01:05:12.960 --> 01:05:18.800]  I've been doing this show for 12 years, and in all this time, I've been looking for people
[01:05:18.800 --> 01:05:30.800]  who have the moxie, or whatever it takes, to be prepared to take these guys on.
[01:05:30.800 --> 01:05:46.200]  And I've got about five or six in 12 years, and we used to hear a lot about sheeple, these
[01:05:46.200 --> 01:05:50.000]  guys who talk a big show, but don't do anything, and I got real frustrated with that, that's
[01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:56.200]  not appropriate, because people have their own issues, they have their own life they
[01:05:56.200 --> 01:06:07.560]  have to live, it won't take many of us to change everything.
[01:06:07.560 --> 01:06:14.480]  And Adam, we're at two of those people that do not want to get away.
[01:06:14.480 --> 01:06:25.560]  I am struggling to get my project launched, and when I do, I want these two on my team.
[01:06:25.560 --> 01:06:27.680]  We really can change everything.
[01:06:27.680 --> 01:06:37.520]  When I started this project, it was with the intent of helping people find some remedy.
[01:06:37.520 --> 01:06:46.280]  When I originally started, I never imagined that we could change everything, but we can.
[01:06:46.280 --> 01:06:57.400]  We can evolve the practice of law into the 21st century, change everything.
[01:06:57.400 --> 01:07:00.880]  It's hard to explain how profound this is.
[01:07:00.880 --> 01:07:07.480]  People have been doing legal research the same way for at least 800 years that we know
[01:07:07.480 --> 01:07:10.600]  of.
[01:07:10.600 --> 01:07:18.480]  And if I took the problem of legal research to a room full of 10-year-olds and told them
[01:07:18.480 --> 01:07:25.400]  to say, guys, I got this problem, I got all of these laws, and we've got all of these
[01:07:25.400 --> 01:07:31.640]  cases that were developed from these laws, how do I organize these things so I can find
[01:07:31.640 --> 01:07:36.640]  all the cases I need on a specific point of law?
[01:07:36.640 --> 01:07:45.240]  But one of them would say, oh, use key words, yeah, just make up this phrase that you might
[01:07:45.240 --> 01:07:53.360]  think might turn up in this particular pleading or this particular case, and you can find
[01:07:53.360 --> 01:07:57.080]  the cases that you did.
[01:07:57.080 --> 01:08:05.000]  That is just so fundamentally wrong.
[01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:08.480]  But we have lawyers who were taught to do it that way, by lawyers who were taught to
[01:08:08.480 --> 01:08:16.680]  do it that way, by lawyers who were taught to do it that way for 800 years.
[01:08:16.680 --> 01:08:21.280]  It is stupid.
[01:08:21.280 --> 01:08:27.280]  And when I show it to a lawyer, another way of doing it, and if I gave this to a room
[01:08:27.280 --> 01:08:33.800]  full of 10-year-olds and said, how do I organize these things, they would say, well, you should
[01:08:33.800 --> 01:08:39.680]  organize them by the cases as they refer to a specific law.
[01:08:39.680 --> 01:08:44.360]  Is that rocket science?
[01:08:44.360 --> 01:08:49.760]  I mean, duh, every 10-year-old in the room would agree with that.
[01:08:49.760 --> 01:08:58.480]  So why haven't 1,080,000 lawyers currently practicing in the state of, or in the United
[01:08:58.480 --> 01:09:02.920]  States, figured that out?
[01:09:02.920 --> 01:09:05.980]  They're all doing what they were trained to do by people who were doing what they were
[01:09:05.980 --> 01:09:07.480]  trained to do.
[01:09:07.480 --> 01:09:15.080]  They're inside this lawyer box, and they cannot see outside of it.
[01:09:15.080 --> 01:09:22.600]  I'm looking for a group of people who are not inside that lawyer box, who can go back
[01:09:22.600 --> 01:09:31.560]  and look at this problem from a different perspective, and clearly, Adams, one of them,
[01:09:31.560 --> 01:09:34.400]  Brett is clearly one of them.
[01:09:34.400 --> 01:09:36.600]  I lost contact with a few of them.
[01:09:36.600 --> 01:09:44.520]  I had someone in Riverside, California, that I told him once, he decided, you know, I told
[01:09:44.520 --> 01:09:47.560]  everybody the best fight to have is the fight you picked.
[01:09:47.560 --> 01:09:52.400]  Well, he wanted to test this out, so he picked a fight with the city of Riverside.
[01:09:52.400 --> 01:09:57.560]  And I told him once, you are having way too much fun, and he said, yes, I am.
[01:09:57.560 --> 01:09:59.800]  But I've lost contact with everyone again back.
[01:09:59.800 --> 01:10:05.160]  I want to get a small group, we put them together.
[01:10:05.160 --> 01:10:13.520]  We can change everything, and our grandchildren, and our great grandchildren, can have a tool
[01:10:13.520 --> 01:10:19.960]  that's dramatically more effective than what is being used now.
[01:10:19.960 --> 01:10:26.920]  They will have access to all of the law, and the law absolutely consistent.
[01:10:26.920 --> 01:10:27.920]  We can change everything.
[01:10:27.920 --> 01:10:30.520]  Okay, I'm going to stop preaching now.
[01:10:30.520 --> 01:10:34.040]  I'm a little bit passionate about this.
[01:10:34.040 --> 01:10:40.320]  Okay, Adam, and then that's the reason I asked you why, what you are after.
[01:10:40.320 --> 01:10:44.640]  If you want to sue them for a lot of money, it would move you in one direction, because
[01:10:44.640 --> 01:10:51.600]  the best way to get money out of these guys is through mediation.
[01:10:51.600 --> 01:10:53.600]  Let's make a deal.
[01:10:53.600 --> 01:10:54.600]  Yeah.
[01:10:54.600 --> 01:11:00.680]  But if you want to beat them up, then you can still make a deal, but you have to beat
[01:11:00.680 --> 01:11:01.680]  them up.
[01:11:01.680 --> 01:11:05.040]  You can beat them up for a while beforehand.
[01:11:05.040 --> 01:11:11.880]  If you expect to win a case at the end of the day, forget that noise.
[01:11:11.880 --> 01:11:16.600]  It's not about winning, that's not how we change them.
[01:11:16.600 --> 01:11:19.280]  We change them by having a good fight with them.
[01:11:19.280 --> 01:11:24.960]  Adam, when you were growing up, did you ever have a kid in a fight in the school parking
[01:11:24.960 --> 01:11:25.960]  lot?
[01:11:25.960 --> 01:11:31.960]  There was a school playground with a kid in school.
[01:11:31.960 --> 01:11:32.960]  Yes.
[01:11:32.960 --> 01:11:39.680]  Okay, what happened, okay, was it a good fight?
[01:11:39.680 --> 01:11:42.840]  Yeah, I won.
[01:11:42.840 --> 01:11:45.840]  What happened after the fight?
[01:11:45.840 --> 01:11:49.120]  Were you enemies, or did you become friends?
[01:11:49.120 --> 01:11:55.080]  Well, that's how I met my best friend, what ended up becoming my best friend.
[01:11:55.080 --> 01:12:00.800]  That is exactly how it works.
[01:12:00.800 --> 01:12:05.720]  I think most of us have stories like that.
[01:12:05.720 --> 01:12:09.440]  Good friend is bred out of mutual respect.
[01:12:09.440 --> 01:12:14.560]  A lot of people here know Harman Taylor.
[01:12:14.560 --> 01:12:22.080]  Harman Taylor gave up his bar card in disgust.
[01:12:22.080 --> 01:12:28.040]  When I first met him, I was introduced to him by a policeman that I kept from losing
[01:12:28.040 --> 01:12:32.080]  his job, and Harman was doing constitution classes.
[01:12:32.080 --> 01:12:37.280]  Harman's about five foot two, maybe five foot four, and maybe 120 pounds.
[01:12:37.280 --> 01:12:48.800]  A Walter Middy kind of guy, and the day before, Robert got me a meeting with Harman, and
[01:12:48.800 --> 01:12:53.720]  the day, the morning that I was going to go meet with him, I was in the convenience store
[01:12:53.720 --> 01:12:58.120]  across the street from my house, and I had this big Airdale dog in there that was trying
[01:12:58.120 --> 01:12:59.120]  to get out.
[01:12:59.120 --> 01:13:04.280]  There were just six women that worked there, so it was a big dog, so I got in there and
[01:13:04.280 --> 01:13:08.920]  I'm shooting it out toward the door, and two people coming in and saw what we were doing.
[01:13:08.920 --> 01:13:10.880]  They pulled the doors open.
[01:13:10.880 --> 01:13:16.360]  When the dog saw where I was pushing it, it spun around and dove and took my hand out
[01:13:16.360 --> 01:13:25.600]  of the air, and it bit me and broke the skin, so a dog got it, and he's not going anywhere
[01:13:25.600 --> 01:13:31.840]  now, so we run him in the office, and when he ran in the office, he ran to the back and
[01:13:31.840 --> 01:13:36.960]  realized there wasn't a way out, and spun around and come back at me, and I reached for
[01:13:36.960 --> 01:13:39.960]  the doorknob to close it, but she was too quick.
[01:13:39.960 --> 01:13:45.960]  She grabbed my hand and sunk every tooth to the bone, and when she did, I'd come over
[01:13:45.960 --> 01:13:49.280]  the top and hit her in the top of the head, and all four feet went straight out and she
[01:13:49.280 --> 01:13:50.280]  went down.
[01:13:50.280 --> 01:13:55.240]  I reached to grab her before she got her sense about her, but I was too slow, and she grabbed
[01:13:55.240 --> 01:14:00.320]  my other hand, sunk every tooth to the bone, so I just closed my hand around her lower
[01:14:00.320 --> 01:14:06.280]  jaw, tried her jaw open, pushed her head into the ground, grabbed her by the throat and
[01:14:06.280 --> 01:14:14.320]  choked her until she crapped all over herself, and when she collapsed, I thought, man, I
[01:14:14.320 --> 01:14:15.320]  don't want to kill her.
[01:14:15.320 --> 01:14:16.320]  She's an Airdale.
[01:14:16.320 --> 01:14:22.920]  Airdale was never back down, so I gave her one breath, and I gave her that breath, and
[01:14:22.920 --> 01:14:29.360]  she was on me like a tiger, so I managed to pick her up with my left hand, open the bathroom
[01:14:29.360 --> 01:14:32.440]  door with my right and explore in and slam the door.
[01:14:32.440 --> 01:14:36.080]  Well, I came out and Tom the cop is there.
[01:14:36.080 --> 01:14:37.800]  He said, does she bite?
[01:14:37.800 --> 01:14:41.640]  And I'm holding my hands out in front of me, and there's a line of blood going back in
[01:14:41.640 --> 01:14:42.640]  the office.
[01:14:42.640 --> 01:14:46.120]  Oh, yeah, Tom, she bites.
[01:14:46.120 --> 01:14:54.800]  Well, I got some gauze taping wrapped up in my hands, and I was wearing a white, three-piece
[01:14:54.800 --> 01:15:03.600]  Yves Saint Laurent suit, and I went to meet Harman Taylor, and I'm sitting in his house
[01:15:03.600 --> 01:15:09.920]  with my forearms on my knees and holding my hands out so that I don't get, because blood
[01:15:09.920 --> 01:15:14.680]  is seeping through the bandages, and I didn't want to get it on my suit.
[01:15:14.680 --> 01:15:22.600]  And finally, Harman said, I just got to ask, what happened to you?
[01:15:22.600 --> 01:15:33.040]  Oh, this, well, I had a little disagreement with a dog, and he said, who won, and I leaned
[01:15:33.040 --> 01:15:37.440]  forward and said, I did.
[01:15:37.440 --> 01:15:40.320]  I got a call from Robert the next day.
[01:15:40.320 --> 01:15:43.000]  What did you do to Harman?
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:44.880]  He thinks you're crazy.
[01:15:44.880 --> 01:15:52.440]  Well, Harman, I've since come to know one another pretty well, but he still thinks I'm
[01:15:52.440 --> 01:15:53.440]  crazy.
[01:15:53.440 --> 01:16:01.960]  The point of the story is, is the dog catcher come and got the dog, and they put the dog
[01:16:01.960 --> 01:16:02.960]  down.
[01:16:02.960 --> 01:16:08.160]  Nobody came to claim it, and it really kind of broke my heart.
[01:16:08.160 --> 01:16:16.160]  He said, that dog gave me a great fight, and I appreciate her, because she gave me a great
[01:16:16.160 --> 01:16:17.160]  fight.
[01:16:17.160 --> 01:16:22.720]  We appreciate people who give us a great fight.
[01:16:22.720 --> 01:16:31.120]  Adam, you give these guys a good fight, it will change everything, they won't hate you,
[01:16:31.120 --> 01:16:32.120]  they'll appreciate you.
[01:16:32.120 --> 01:16:40.480]  Hang on, I got to go to break Randy Kelton, Randy Kelton Brett's, Randy Kelton Brett
[01:16:40.480 --> 01:17:00.440] 's fountain root of low radio, I'll get this fixed in a minute, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.440 --> 01:17:05.720]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.720 --> 01:17:09.400]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares proven method.
[01:17:09.400 --> 01:17:13.560]  Michael Meares has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[01:17:13.560 --> 01:17:14.560]  can win two.
[01:17:14.560 --> 01:17:19.360]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.360 --> 01:17:25.120]  civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:17:25.120 --> 01:17:29.760]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:17:29.760 --> 01:17:33.960]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.960 --> 01:17:39.080]  The Michael Meares proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:39.080 --> 01:17:41.200]  Federal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.200 --> 01:17:46.720]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner
[01:17:46.720 --> 01:17:49.720]  or email Michael Meares at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.720 --> 01:17:57.440]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.440 --> 01:18:00.400]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.400 --> 01:18:01.400]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.400 --> 01:18:04.960]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.960 --> 01:18:08.800]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back, I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.800 --> 01:18:13.520]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.520 --> 01:18:17.280]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[01:18:17.280 --> 01:18:20.640]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.640 --> 01:18:22.200]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.200 --> 01:18:24.160]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.160 --> 01:18:28.480]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies
[01:18:28.480 --> 01:18:29.480]  or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.480 --> 01:18:31.640]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.640 --> 01:18:38.040]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.040 --> 01:18:43.720]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.720 --> 01:18:44.720]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.720 --> 01:18:45.720]  No.
[01:18:45.720 --> 01:18:47.440]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.440 --> 01:18:48.440]  No.
[01:18:48.440 --> 01:18:49.440]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.440 --> 01:18:50.440]  No.
[01:18:50.440 --> 01:18:51.440]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.440 --> 01:18:56.200]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:56.200 --> 01:18:57.200]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.200 --> 01:18:58.720]  We are Logos.
[01:18:58.720 --> 01:19:00.520]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:00.520 --> 01:19:08.360]  This is the Logos, Logos, RadioNetwork.
[01:20:00.520 --> 01:20:04.880]  Okay.
[01:20:04.880 --> 01:20:05.880]  We are back.
[01:20:05.880 --> 01:20:10.800]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain with a lot of radio and I got my tang untongled over the
[01:20:10.800 --> 01:20:11.800]  break.
[01:20:11.800 --> 01:20:12.800]  Okay.
[01:20:12.800 --> 01:20:20.560]  But anyway, we give them a good fight.
[01:20:20.560 --> 01:20:29.480]  I'm believing that if we set these guys up right and essentially what you're doing, Adam,
[01:20:29.480 --> 01:20:36.600]  you're taking where they didn't follow their own procedures and cramming it down their
[01:20:36.600 --> 01:20:37.600]  throats.
[01:20:37.600 --> 01:20:43.320]  When you're in the fight, they don't like it one little bit.
[01:20:43.320 --> 01:20:49.800]  But once you're done, then you get at least a grudging respect.
[01:20:49.800 --> 01:20:53.600]  You know, I'm in Wise County, Texas.
[01:20:53.600 --> 01:20:58.040]  That's where I'm from and that's where I've been for the last 40 years.
[01:20:58.040 --> 01:21:01.920]  I work these guys over.
[01:21:01.920 --> 01:21:10.120]  But when a policeman has a problem with the system, they come to me.
[01:21:10.120 --> 01:21:11.120]  And they've done that.
[01:21:11.120 --> 01:21:16.280]  The guy that referred me to Harman Taylor, the city he worked for tried to fire him because
[01:21:16.280 --> 01:21:18.480]  he was one of us.
[01:21:18.480 --> 01:21:21.680]  He found me in a hardware store.
[01:21:21.680 --> 01:21:24.200]  I don't know how he found me.
[01:21:24.200 --> 01:21:29.080]  He never would tell me who referred him to me.
[01:21:29.080 --> 01:21:31.080]  But we took on the city of Decatur.
[01:21:31.080 --> 01:21:35.400]  He was off work full pay for a year.
[01:21:35.400 --> 01:21:44.800]  And when we were done, they had to take him back with full seniority, lost nothing.
[01:21:44.800 --> 01:21:52.560]  We even really beat up the Texas Ranger, who is now the county sheriff.
[01:21:52.560 --> 01:22:00.920]  I have worked over half the county, but I am highly respected.
[01:22:00.920 --> 01:22:06.280]  I took on the county attorney prosecuted me when a sheriff's deputy tried to kill me,
[01:22:06.280 --> 01:22:10.960]  couldn't get it done, and arrested me to cover up for what he did.
[01:22:10.960 --> 01:22:14.240]  I stood in the courtroom and asked the jury, are you going to listen to him?
[01:22:14.240 --> 01:22:15.800]  This was the prosecutor.
[01:22:15.800 --> 01:22:17.680]  You know what this is?
[01:22:17.680 --> 01:22:22.280]  This is an unscrupulous prosecutor and I'd already proved it.
[01:22:22.280 --> 01:22:26.120]  So I worked him over pretty good in court.
[01:22:26.120 --> 01:22:31.640]  Ten years later, he had left town and went somewhere in Alabama and then wound up in
[01:22:31.640 --> 01:22:35.080]  Alaska, came back to Texas.
[01:22:35.080 --> 01:22:36.360]  I met him in the courthouse.
[01:22:36.360 --> 01:22:39.480]  He was doing court appointed counsel.
[01:22:39.480 --> 01:22:44.040]  And I asked him for some consultation over some things that had to do with when he was
[01:22:44.040 --> 01:22:47.240]  a prosecutor, how prosecutors worked.
[01:22:47.240 --> 01:22:51.160]  And one of the things he told me, he said, remember that case we had?
[01:22:51.160 --> 01:22:53.880]  Oh, yeah, I remember that.
[01:22:53.880 --> 01:22:56.720]  He said, you were kind of hard on me.
[01:22:56.720 --> 01:22:59.160]  I said, well, I'm sorry I had to do that.
[01:22:59.160 --> 01:23:03.400]  He said, oh, no, no, you don't understand.
[01:23:03.400 --> 01:23:11.840]  I always respected you for that and that's the way humans work.
[01:23:11.840 --> 01:23:18.840]  If we get in a good fight and both of us fight fairer, win, lose, or draw, you gain a lot
[01:23:18.840 --> 01:23:20.360]  of respect.
[01:23:20.360 --> 01:23:31.440]  If guys like Adam and Brett can take these guys on one and just walk them through the
[01:23:31.440 --> 01:23:41.360]  system, then they look around wondering who else is going to be a Brett or an Adam.
[01:23:41.360 --> 01:23:45.560]  We can change everything.
[01:23:45.560 --> 01:23:49.080]  We don't have to have everybody doing this.
[01:23:49.080 --> 01:23:53.600]  There are a lot of people out there listening that have issues and we've got too much going
[01:23:53.600 --> 01:23:54.600]  on in our life.
[01:23:54.600 --> 01:24:00.080]  They don't have time to do what we're doing because they don't have this specific motivation
[01:24:00.080 --> 01:24:02.200]  and that's okay.
[01:24:02.200 --> 01:24:04.720]  Everybody doesn't have to do this.
[01:24:04.720 --> 01:24:07.880]  Only a few and we're finding them.
[01:24:07.880 --> 01:24:13.400]  Just for you to know, Adam and Brett, I appreciate both of you.
[01:24:13.400 --> 01:24:19.520]  Okay, where were we at, Brett, before I started preaching?
[01:24:19.520 --> 01:24:30.040]  Well, Adam was looking for some information as to what's the best approach for him to
[01:24:30.040 --> 01:24:37.640]  get to the result he's looking for, which is to run these guys through the ringer, give
[01:24:37.640 --> 01:24:45.280]  them a hard time making Adam the routine.
[01:24:45.280 --> 01:24:53.560]  We've got these rules, okay, get out your little invisible tar baby, make sure everybody
[01:24:53.560 --> 01:25:04.040]  gets an opportunity to touch it, and then sting them, and each person who touches it
[01:25:04.040 --> 01:25:07.840]  creates another tort.
[01:25:07.840 --> 01:25:08.840]  These are all torches.
[01:25:08.840 --> 01:25:10.520]  They're not causes that directly cause it.
[01:25:10.520 --> 01:25:18.440]  Well, they are causes of action in terms of, what's the term about when someone's under
[01:25:18.440 --> 01:25:23.200]  contract to you?
[01:25:23.200 --> 01:25:24.200]  Good services.
[01:25:24.200 --> 01:25:25.200]  Good faith.
[01:25:25.200 --> 01:25:39.160]  I was just listening to a deal now, some high-level executives were sued for not providing the
[01:25:39.160 --> 01:25:45.320]  services they were, they should have, there's a special term for it, I can't think of it
[01:25:45.320 --> 01:25:46.320]  at the moment.
[01:25:46.320 --> 01:25:48.320]  A breach of contract?
[01:25:48.320 --> 01:25:57.960]  No, it's about providing the service that the contract intended, and good faith, and
[01:25:57.960 --> 01:26:01.440]  this especially applies to public officials.
[01:26:01.440 --> 01:26:08.760]  Public officials are under contract with us, and they're required to act in good faith,
[01:26:08.760 --> 01:26:12.120]  it's good faith in something services.
[01:26:12.120 --> 01:26:16.720]  They're just specific cause of action for that.
[01:26:16.720 --> 01:26:20.400]  Public officials are especially vulnerable to it.
[01:26:20.400 --> 01:26:26.960]  Any time they fail to form a duty they're required to form, or to exert authority they
[01:26:26.960 --> 01:26:32.440]  don't want to express your have, then not only violate criminal law, if it denies you
[01:26:32.440 --> 01:26:40.080]  in the full and free access to your enjoyment of right, but they also create a tort, and
[01:26:40.080 --> 01:26:41.600]  you can sue them.
[01:26:41.600 --> 01:26:49.920]  And at the end of the day, it is my belief that a lawsuit is the most powerful thing
[01:26:49.920 --> 01:26:59.120]  you can do, that's the one thing they can't get around.
[01:26:59.120 --> 01:27:04.880]  And when you file a lawsuit, when a policeman does something stupid, and you file a lawsuit
[01:27:04.880 --> 01:27:14.240]  against him, now you've got his boss, his boss's boss, the mayor, they've got a pal,
[01:27:14.240 --> 01:27:20.200]  his attorneys, he turns into a city manager, and everybody gets involved.
[01:27:20.200 --> 01:27:23.200]  Risk insurance people involved?
[01:27:23.200 --> 01:27:34.200]  I was at the Tarrant County Courthouse, and I was taking photos outside, and I came in,
[01:27:34.200 --> 01:27:43.000]  and the guard asked me if, he looked at my cell phone, I had a little clip on it, there
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:47.200]  was a clip on my pocket, and he said, that's pretty cool, where'd you get that?
[01:27:47.200 --> 01:27:49.800]  And I said, I made it.
[01:27:49.800 --> 01:27:50.800]  You made that?
[01:27:50.800 --> 01:27:51.800]  I said, yeah, I did.
[01:27:51.800 --> 01:27:56.960]  See, where it sits, it slips in the case, and you clip it on your pocket, and it holds
[01:27:56.960 --> 01:28:03.560]  the top of the cell phone up so that the camera is above the lip of the pocket.
[01:28:03.560 --> 01:28:07.440]  And he said, are you videotaping us without our permission?
[01:28:07.440 --> 01:28:13.200]  Oh yeah, I do that all the time.
[01:28:13.200 --> 01:28:23.400]  And the deputy asked me, well, why do you do that?
[01:28:23.400 --> 01:28:26.200]  I said, oh, that's how I make my living.
[01:28:26.200 --> 01:28:29.000]  You make your living videotaping police officers?
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:32.120]  Oh no, no, I make my living suing police officers.
[01:28:32.120 --> 01:28:36.360]  That's all I got to do is come in and annoy you a little bit, you'll do something stupid,
[01:28:36.360 --> 01:28:40.000]  then I get to sue you.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:46.640]  That got all over the courthouse in Tarrant County, there's either three or four different
[01:28:46.640 --> 01:28:48.880]  buildings.
[01:28:48.880 --> 01:28:53.600]  Every time I went into the building and they realized who I am, they said, hey, are you
[01:28:53.600 --> 01:28:54.600]  going to sue us?
[01:28:54.600 --> 01:29:00.200]  I said, were you going to do something stupid?
[01:29:00.200 --> 01:29:08.240]  The idea that I was coming in there for the specific purpose of getting them to do something
[01:29:08.240 --> 01:29:15.760]  stupid so I could sue them, on the one hand it scared all of them, and on the other one
[01:29:15.760 --> 01:29:18.480]  it got their respect.
[01:29:18.480 --> 01:29:23.440]  They got really, really careful with me.
[01:29:23.440 --> 01:29:31.160]  I want them really careful with every person that walks in that door.
[01:29:31.160 --> 01:29:34.160]  This is what we can do.
[01:29:34.160 --> 01:29:36.000]  I'm preaching again.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:38.240]  I guess I'm in a preaching mode tonight.
[01:29:38.240 --> 01:29:41.960]  I'm feeling encouraged.
[01:29:41.960 --> 01:29:46.680]  I am, I got Adam and Brett at the same time.
[01:29:46.680 --> 01:29:49.680]  Hang on, about to go to break.
[01:29:49.680 --> 01:30:02.320]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:02.320 --> 01:30:07.320]  Online video gaming is big business in China, but now Beijing is imposing limits on how
[01:30:07.320 --> 01:30:08.920]  long citizens can play.
[01:30:08.920 --> 01:30:13.720]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back to discuss gaming addiction and the Big Brother Nanny
[01:30:13.720 --> 01:30:15.680]  States, next.
[01:30:15.680 --> 01:30:17.760]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.760 --> 01:30:21.400]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.400 --> 01:30:26.400]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.400 --> 01:30:27.920]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:27.920 --> 01:30:31.520]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.520 --> 01:30:34.160]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.160 --> 01:30:39.800]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:39.800 --> 01:30:41.480]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.480 --> 01:30:45.440]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.440 --> 01:30:50.880]  In China, more than 20 million citizens spend half a billion dollars a year in smoky cyber
[01:30:50.880 --> 01:30:55.760]  cafes lost in the virtual world of multiplayer role-playing.
[01:30:55.760 --> 01:31:00.480]  It's so popular that Beijing is trying to prevent addiction to online gaming by imposing
[01:31:00.480 --> 01:31:03.520]  limits on how long citizens can play.
[01:31:03.520 --> 01:31:08.000]  If they play more than three hours straight, their characters' in-game abilities go down.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:11.520]  To get those abilities back, players must take a five-hour break.
[01:31:11.520 --> 01:31:16.800]  I'm all for parents doing this because no kid should waste his life in virtual combat,
[01:31:16.800 --> 01:31:21.880]  but for the government to monitor and control people's use of their own computers is just
[01:31:21.880 --> 01:31:22.880]  wrong.
[01:31:22.880 --> 01:31:31.320]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.320 --> 01:31:36.720]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.720 --> 01:31:38.840]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.840 --> 01:31:43.760]  Over 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.760 --> 01:31:47.760]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:47.760 --> 01:31:49.200]  force respondents have died.
[01:31:49.200 --> 01:31:52.960]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a structural engineer, I'm a New York City correctional
[01:31:52.960 --> 01:31:57.160]  officer, I'm an Air Force pilot, I'm a father who lost his son, we're Americans, and we
[01:31:57.160 --> 01:31:58.320]  deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.320 --> 01:32:01.480]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.480 --> 01:32:05.680]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.680 --> 01:32:09.480]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[01:32:09.480 --> 01:32:13.600]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.600 --> 01:32:16.640]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:16.640 --> 01:32:20.640]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.640 --> 01:32:24.520]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:24.520 --> 01:32:26.400]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.400 --> 01:32:29.880]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:29.880 --> 01:32:33.640]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:33.640 --> 01:32:36.040]  is, and how to hold courts to the Rule of Law.
[01:32:36.040 --> 01:32:40.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:41.360]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.360 --> 01:32:44.560]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:44.560 --> 01:32:49.120]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:49.120 --> 01:32:51.440]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.440 --> 01:32:55.400]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[01:32:55.400 --> 01:32:59.160]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:59.160 --> 01:33:06.160]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.160 --> 01:33:56.320]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we talked to Brad on the break.
[01:33:56.320 --> 01:34:03.920]  I feel like I'm rambling, there's something I'm trying to drag out of my brain, and it's
[01:34:03.920 --> 01:34:10.000]  not coming out, so I'm kind of running around in circles.
[01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:15.120]  Adam, what do you need, you need to get me focused.
[01:34:15.120 --> 01:34:20.840]  I think I'm getting overtired, I've been working since 2 this morning, so I'm brain
[01:34:20.840 --> 01:34:21.840]  dead.
[01:34:21.840 --> 01:34:30.120]  Can you hear me, yes I can, yeah I can barely hear you, well I humbly accept your, your
[01:34:30.120 --> 01:34:37.720]  knighthood, appreciate it, this is what I love to do, it's a one for you and Eddie and
[01:34:37.720 --> 01:34:44.080]  Deborah, putting on this program, I wouldn't have the outlet that I need to keep fighting,
[01:34:44.080 --> 01:34:47.080]  and that's all I really want to do is fight.
[01:34:47.080 --> 01:34:53.720]  So I will email you, and I'd like to get in touch with Brett, and that other fellow Scott
[01:34:53.720 --> 01:34:58.960]  that was on your program, sometimes he seems to need to be a pretty knowledgeable fellow,
[01:34:58.960 --> 01:35:01.440]  and I would love to join your team.
[01:35:01.440 --> 01:35:10.560]  Okay wait, there's one thing I have to tell you about Scott, he's a redneck, but I won't
[01:35:10.560 --> 01:35:15.960]  hold that against you.
[01:35:15.960 --> 01:35:23.200]  So yeah, I'm having a real hard time hearing you, but Randy I'll email you tomorrow, and
[01:35:23.200 --> 01:35:29.280]  if it's alright with Brett, I'd like to give you, if you want to give me his email, I'll
[01:35:29.280 --> 01:35:34.160]  email you and maybe we can get together, and maybe we can all meet up and have some sort
[01:35:34.160 --> 01:35:36.760]  of a conference or something and talk about this stuff.
[01:35:36.760 --> 01:35:43.360]  I'm not too far from Austin, I've got time and the motivation, so other than that I guess
[01:35:43.360 --> 01:35:44.360]  I'll...
[01:35:44.360 --> 01:35:51.960]  I can do it on Zoom or Skype or something, I'm in Tennessee at the moment, and I'm struggling
[01:35:51.960 --> 01:35:55.200]  with my equipment here.
[01:35:55.200 --> 01:36:04.600]  If I turn my mic up, it seems that my mic is picking up background noise on my end, and
[01:36:04.600 --> 01:36:10.480]  that suppresses your voice, because I have a suppressor on my side.
[01:36:10.480 --> 01:36:17.680]  So if I turn it down so it stops suppressing your voice, then you can't hear me be good.
[01:36:17.680 --> 01:36:23.600]  So I'm going to have to figure out something to solve this issue.
[01:36:23.600 --> 01:36:24.600]  Yeah.
[01:36:24.600 --> 01:36:25.600]  Maybe...
[01:36:25.600 --> 01:36:28.760]  I think the suppressor may be a little too hot.
[01:36:28.760 --> 01:36:31.560]  Okay, go ahead Adam.
[01:36:31.560 --> 01:36:34.080]  Barely hear you.
[01:36:34.080 --> 01:36:37.600]  Okay, how's that?
[01:36:37.600 --> 01:36:38.600]  No.
[01:36:38.600 --> 01:36:40.600]  Too hot?
[01:36:40.600 --> 01:36:43.080]  Yeah, then we can't hear him at all.
[01:36:43.080 --> 01:36:46.080]  All we hear is, so whatever machine is in your office.
[01:36:46.080 --> 01:36:51.480]  Okay, there must be something in here that I can't hear.
[01:36:51.480 --> 01:36:56.280]  Maybe it's the buzzing in my head that you're hearing.
[01:36:56.280 --> 01:37:01.080]  Okay, go ahead Adam.
[01:37:01.080 --> 01:37:07.600]  Yeah, I don't know what's going on with the production, but the last few months y'all
[01:37:07.600 --> 01:37:14.080]  are really, really hard to hear, and I'm in a car and I could just barely make out y'all's
[01:37:14.080 --> 01:37:15.080]  voices.
[01:37:15.080 --> 01:37:16.080]  So...
[01:37:16.080 --> 01:37:22.160]  Okay, I'm going to talk to Deborah and see if she can't turn down that suppressor somewhat.
[01:37:22.160 --> 01:37:28.280]  That way I can turn my mic up hotter, and it won't amplify the background.
[01:37:28.280 --> 01:37:32.840]  It won't use the background noise so much to suppress your voice.
[01:37:32.840 --> 01:37:36.160]  Yeah, yeah, because it used to not be that way.
[01:37:36.160 --> 01:37:41.480]  You know, year or so back y'all were very, very easy to hear, but some reason the last
[01:37:41.480 --> 01:37:45.160]  few months, y'all are really, really hard to hear.
[01:37:45.160 --> 01:37:52.160]  Well we've had some equipment go down that we haven't been able to afford to replace.
[01:37:52.160 --> 01:37:56.280]  So we're kind of struggling to keep this thing on the air.
[01:37:56.280 --> 01:37:59.640]  Well, maybe I can help out with that.
[01:37:59.640 --> 01:38:03.400]  Randy, I'm going to email you tomorrow.
[01:38:03.400 --> 01:38:04.400]  I'm Adam from Texas.
[01:38:04.400 --> 01:38:08.120]  I'm sure you can recognize my emails, I got the e-goals on them.
[01:38:08.120 --> 01:38:11.920]  I'm going to email you and let's get together and work something out.
[01:38:11.920 --> 01:38:21.440]  Okay, because right now Brett is looking at putting together some lawsuits based on what's
[01:38:21.440 --> 01:38:28.760]  has occurred with him, and I want to put together, when we put these together, we want to do
[01:38:28.760 --> 01:38:36.520]  it so that we create arguments based on issues.
[01:38:36.520 --> 01:38:43.480]  And doing all these questionnaire, something grew out of the practice.
[01:38:43.480 --> 01:38:52.080]  And that is, there can be essentially an infinite number of different facts that leads you to
[01:38:52.080 --> 01:38:55.600]  any one legal element.
[01:38:55.600 --> 01:39:02.600]  But once you get to that legal element, the legal element is almost always argued precisely
[01:39:02.600 --> 01:39:04.800]  the same.
[01:39:04.800 --> 01:39:09.560]  So I want to build legal arguments for the element.
[01:39:09.560 --> 01:39:16.200]  Then use the fact set to bring us to that element, so that anytime the questionnaire brings us
[01:39:16.200 --> 01:39:20.760]  to an element, the system can go into the database, pull that argument out, drop it
[01:39:20.760 --> 01:39:25.880]  in the document, and then we go to the next element and drop it in the document.
[01:39:25.880 --> 01:39:31.600]  We'll take a cause of action and each cause of action will have a set of elements.
[01:39:31.600 --> 01:39:38.320]  We use the fact set to bring us to the cause of action, then we bring out each of the elements
[01:39:38.320 --> 01:39:44.920]  that are always argued essentially the same, and just attach the facts that addresses the
[01:39:44.920 --> 01:39:56.320]  element, we can build a tool that will literally write petitions for people, write their lawsuit
[01:39:56.320 --> 01:40:01.760]  for them, and all they have to do is answer questions.
[01:40:01.760 --> 01:40:06.480]  Does that make sense?
[01:40:06.480 --> 01:40:09.920]  I think it's a great idea.
[01:40:09.920 --> 01:40:17.760]  This is something that grew out of, we have loaded all my questionnaires into a NEOJ4
[01:40:17.760 --> 01:40:27.800]  database, and it counts 500 questionnaires and 1.5 million nodes at this point.
[01:40:27.800 --> 01:40:31.320]  So we have a lot of test data to work from.
[01:40:31.320 --> 01:40:40.880]  I have an AI programmer who is using this test data to teach the AI engine how to read
[01:40:40.880 --> 01:40:53.200]  code, and he's almost got that part finished, where creating a legal lexicon of legalese.
[01:40:53.200 --> 01:40:58.520]  So we have all the definitions for all of these terms, wherever they occur in the codes,
[01:40:58.520 --> 01:41:05.080]  so we can access the most appropriate definition of a term no matter where it occurs, and then
[01:41:05.080 --> 01:41:11.320]  we take that as the first step toward teaching the engine to speak legalese and read and
[01:41:11.320 --> 01:41:13.680]  understand it.
[01:41:13.680 --> 01:41:22.760]  Then when I create these questions from the code, the code says you must do this thing,
[01:41:22.760 --> 01:41:26.400]  and I turn that into did you do this thing?
[01:41:26.400 --> 01:41:35.520]  So there's only about six different structures that I've come across in doing this.
[01:41:35.520 --> 01:41:41.240]  The code can say if you did this and if you did that, then you must do this.
[01:41:41.240 --> 01:41:48.800]  So my process says, well, where you did this and where you did that, did you do this?
[01:41:48.800 --> 01:41:49.800]  That's a variation.
[01:41:49.800 --> 01:41:53.160]  There's only about six of them that I've come across.
[01:41:53.160 --> 01:41:58.240]  It's easy enough to teach an AI engine to recognize and understand.
[01:41:58.240 --> 01:42:05.360]  So we will be able to take a complete set of code and run the engine against it, and
[01:42:05.360 --> 01:42:08.640]  it will turn them into interconnected questionnaires.
[01:42:08.640 --> 01:42:16.600]  Then we have a human being read it so that we can pick up the inferences that occur in
[01:42:16.600 --> 01:42:20.640]  the language that's not directly apparent.
[01:42:20.640 --> 01:42:29.000]  I had someone contact me wanting to do some work for me building databases.
[01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:37.280]  He was from India, and his last name was spelled B-U-S-H-I-T.
[01:42:37.280 --> 01:42:41.120]  He didn't get it.
[01:42:41.120 --> 01:42:47.720]  Everyone in the United States would add two Ls in there, but him not being a native speaker
[01:42:47.720 --> 01:42:49.000]  would have never got it.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:55.880]  So we need a native speaker to read these, to catch these implications in new windows
[01:42:55.880 --> 01:43:03.120]  that are in the language, but the AI engine will take out about 95% of the work.
[01:43:03.120 --> 01:43:11.280]  So we will be able to build these quickly, and pretty very soon we can have a tool that
[01:43:11.280 --> 01:43:18.760]  will light everything, criminal complaints, professional conduct complaints, bar grievances,
[01:43:18.760 --> 01:43:26.760]  judicial conduct complaints, crime, lawsuits, motions, pleadings, everything.
[01:43:26.760 --> 01:43:31.120]  When we get that, the law becomes absolutely consistent.
[01:43:31.120 --> 01:43:33.000]  We can change everything.
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  Hang on.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  About to go to break.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:38.120]  Adam, if we're done with you, I will go on to the other callers.
[01:43:38.120 --> 01:43:43.040]  Heck, we've only got one segment left.
[01:43:43.040 --> 01:44:00.720]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.720 --> 01:44:05.360]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:44:05.360 --> 01:44:06.760]  of nutrition.
[01:44:06.760 --> 01:44:11.520]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.520 --> 01:44:17.760]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.760 --> 01:44:22.600]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[01:44:22.600 --> 01:44:26.040]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:26.040 --> 01:44:30.760]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[01:44:30.760 --> 01:44:31.760]  we reject.
[01:44:31.760 --> 01:44:37.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:40.200]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.200 --> 01:44:46.200]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:46.200 --> 01:44:47.760]  quality radio.
[01:44:47.760 --> 01:44:52.120]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:52.120 --> 01:44:57.360]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:44:57.360 --> 01:44:59.320]  increase your income.
[01:44:59.320 --> 01:45:00.320]  Order now.
[01:45:00.320 --> 01:45:06.680]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:06.680 --> 01:45:13.440]  In your case without an attorney, with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:13.440 --> 01:45:17.440]  that will show you how, in 24 hours, you step-by-step.
[01:45:17.440 --> 01:45:21.240]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:21.240 --> 01:45:25.280]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:25.280 --> 01:45:30.280]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:30.280 --> 01:45:36.160]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:36.160 --> 01:45:41.520]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:41.520 --> 01:45:45.880]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:45.880 --> 01:45:52.040]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:52.040 --> 01:45:54.680]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:54.680 --> 01:46:10.720]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:54.680 --> 01:47:04.680]  Okay, you're in.
[01:47:04.680 --> 01:47:10.800]  All right, and this is Brett Fountain here with Randy Kelton, rule of law radio.
[01:47:10.800 --> 01:47:17.480]  We're wrapping up the last segment on this Friday, the August the 2nd of 2019.
[01:47:17.480 --> 01:47:21.880]  And we're going to go ahead and go to Shane in New York.
[01:47:21.880 --> 01:47:24.880]  Shane?
[01:47:24.880 --> 01:47:31.880]  Hold on, let me, whoa, we just lost Shane.
[01:47:31.880 --> 01:47:36.880]  Hmm, does he drop off?
[01:47:36.880 --> 01:47:39.880]  Yeah, it looks like he dropped off.
[01:47:39.880 --> 01:47:44.880]  Okay, let's go to John in New York.
[01:47:44.880 --> 01:47:45.880]  Hello, John.
[01:47:45.880 --> 01:47:46.880]  Hi, John.
[01:47:46.880 --> 01:47:48.880]  How are you doing?
[01:47:48.880 --> 01:47:50.880]  Thank you very much, Randy.
[01:47:50.880 --> 01:47:52.880]  I'm going to make this fast.
[01:47:52.880 --> 01:47:57.880]  There has been some events which have happened that are changing things, and that's why I'm calling.
[01:47:57.880 --> 01:47:59.880]  Here's a timeline with four dates.
[01:47:59.880 --> 01:48:02.880]  I'm just going to briefly mention the dates and then explain.
[01:48:02.880 --> 01:48:08.880]  November 5th, March 7th, April 9th, and July 7th.
[01:48:08.880 --> 01:48:13.880]  November 5th, the defendant filed a traffic ticket appeal in county court.
[01:48:13.880 --> 01:48:21.880]  March 7th, acting ADA sends his brief to the defendant and the judge in which he poo-poo's the defendant's arguments,
[01:48:21.880 --> 01:48:24.880]  but doesn't address the most powerful one.
[01:48:24.880 --> 01:48:26.880]  We already discussed that.
[01:48:26.880 --> 01:48:32.880]  April 9th, county judge sends his decision to the county clerk, but not to the defendant.
[01:48:32.880 --> 01:48:38.880]  The defendant repeatedly kept checking with the county court every day and got excused after excused.
[01:48:38.880 --> 01:48:40.880]  It's on the DA's desk.
[01:48:40.880 --> 01:48:41.880]  I don't know.
[01:48:41.880 --> 01:48:42.880]  I couldn't find it.
[01:48:42.880 --> 01:48:44.880]  It's an obvious setup.
[01:48:44.880 --> 01:48:46.880]  I understand that.
[01:48:46.880 --> 01:48:51.880]  July 7th, the defendant was talking with the county clerk on some other matter,
[01:48:51.880 --> 01:49:00.880]  and literally accidentally finds out that the county court judge has handed down a decision back in April on April 9th.
[01:49:00.880 --> 01:49:02.880]  Your comments.
[01:49:02.880 --> 01:49:04.880]  Oh, he's afraid to go forward.
[01:49:04.880 --> 01:49:10.880]  Well, first of all, he had doubts about it because of all the length of time that has gone by.
[01:49:10.880 --> 01:49:12.880]  So we need your help with this.
[01:49:12.880 --> 01:49:16.880]  We know what they're doing, but go ahead.
[01:49:16.880 --> 01:49:20.880]  You want to take this, Brett?
[01:49:20.880 --> 01:49:25.880]  No, I couldn't really follow what was being requested.
[01:49:25.880 --> 01:49:26.880]  Okay.
[01:49:26.880 --> 01:49:37.880]  I think the issue was the judge issued a ruling, but they did not reveal the ruling to the appellant
[01:49:37.880 --> 01:49:46.880]  so that the appellant was not able to file a notice of appeal.
[01:49:46.880 --> 01:49:48.880]  They did that on purpose.
[01:49:48.880 --> 01:49:51.880]  I know it, but that's beside the point.
[01:49:51.880 --> 01:50:03.880]  So if the appellant checked and asked the clerk and nobody let him know, then he can still file for an appeal.
[01:50:03.880 --> 01:50:08.880]  Okay, what's the nomenclature you told me once before if this should happen?
[01:50:08.880 --> 01:50:09.880]  And it did.
[01:50:09.880 --> 01:50:13.880]  If this should happen, what's the jargon?
[01:50:13.880 --> 01:50:14.880]  What did they do?
[01:50:14.880 --> 01:50:17.880]  What wrong things did they do?
[01:50:17.880 --> 01:50:18.880]  Did life...
[01:50:18.880 --> 01:50:19.880]  What I did, huh?
[01:50:19.880 --> 01:50:20.880]  Go ahead.
[01:50:20.880 --> 01:50:21.880]  Go ahead.
[01:50:21.880 --> 01:50:28.880]  What I did for something like this is when the appellate court was saying that I didn't timely file something,
[01:50:28.880 --> 01:50:36.880]  I filed a motion for leave to late file, and in the little bullet points of why I was giving them reasons
[01:50:36.880 --> 01:50:44.880]  for granting leave to file something late, I put in those bullet points.
[01:50:44.880 --> 01:50:50.880]  I just ripped the lower court to shreds saying they did this.
[01:50:50.880 --> 01:50:52.880]  They denied me in this way.
[01:50:52.880 --> 01:50:54.880]  They gave me no notice.
[01:50:54.880 --> 01:50:57.880]  They considered six hours to be noticed for this.
[01:50:57.880 --> 01:50:58.880]  They...
[01:50:58.880 --> 01:51:00.880]  The file that they...
[01:51:00.880 --> 01:51:03.880]  When I went to see the file, it was not in the file.
[01:51:03.880 --> 01:51:05.880]  The lady said she didn't know where it was.
[01:51:05.880 --> 01:51:12.880]  Bullet point after bullet point, just kind of making it really obvious that they're either incompetent or unjust or both.
[01:51:12.880 --> 01:51:17.880]  And that was my reasons for why I needed this...
[01:51:17.880 --> 01:51:19.880]  I needed to be allowed to file late.
[01:51:19.880 --> 01:51:22.880]  And they granted it to me.
[01:51:22.880 --> 01:51:26.880]  Okay, now Randy, can you reiterate what he just said so I can get it from both of you?
[01:51:26.880 --> 01:51:35.880]  A motion for late filing for good cause, and then explain the good cause.
[01:51:35.880 --> 01:51:37.880]  That's what you call it?
[01:51:37.880 --> 01:51:39.880]  Yes.
[01:51:39.880 --> 01:51:41.880]  Okay, now do you write it out yourself?
[01:51:41.880 --> 01:51:43.880]  Is there a form?
[01:51:43.880 --> 01:51:45.880]  What do you do?
[01:51:45.880 --> 01:51:47.880]  There is no form.
[01:51:47.880 --> 01:51:49.880]  Okay, so what do you call it?
[01:51:49.880 --> 01:51:55.880]  Okay, think of a motion to the court as a letter explaining your position.
[01:51:55.880 --> 01:51:59.880]  Okay, that was just common sense English.
[01:51:59.880 --> 01:52:01.880]  Common sense English.
[01:52:01.880 --> 01:52:04.880]  Never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[01:52:04.880 --> 01:52:11.880]  If there's law to be asserted, state the law, cite the law directly.
[01:52:11.880 --> 01:52:20.880]  Otherwise, in this case for the most part, you can just explain what you explained to us.
[01:52:20.880 --> 01:52:33.880]  That your individual exercised due diligence in trying to determine when a decision was filed and he was blocked by the court.
[01:52:33.880 --> 01:52:36.880]  That's good cause for delay.
[01:52:36.880 --> 01:52:40.880]  Same argument you would make to a regular human being.
[01:52:40.880 --> 01:52:42.880]  Right, okay.
[01:52:42.880 --> 01:52:45.880]  Okay, that doesn't include someone who lives in New York.
[01:52:45.880 --> 01:52:47.880]  That's different.
[01:52:47.880 --> 01:52:49.880]  What?
[01:52:49.880 --> 01:52:51.880]  Just kidding, I'm picking on Yankees.
[01:52:51.880 --> 01:52:53.880]  That's what I figured.
[01:52:53.880 --> 01:52:55.880]  Okay.
[01:52:55.880 --> 01:52:59.880]  Oh, they're really, they're really, they're pulling every trick in the book.
[01:52:59.880 --> 01:53:02.880]  But you know, this is not something new.
[01:53:02.880 --> 01:53:04.880]  We all know that.
[01:53:04.880 --> 01:53:07.880]  And so there we have it.
[01:53:07.880 --> 01:53:18.880]  So you once quoted, I can't remember what you said, but you used legal jargon and it sounded very good
[01:53:18.880 --> 01:53:20.880]  explaining what it was they did.
[01:53:20.880 --> 01:53:26.880]  They presented his right to what?
[01:53:26.880 --> 01:53:29.880]  What did they present his right to?
[01:53:29.880 --> 01:53:40.880]  They denied him his right to appeal because they denied him notice.
[01:53:40.880 --> 01:53:42.880]  I'm not sure exactly what you're asking.
[01:53:42.880 --> 01:53:44.880]  A due process.
[01:53:44.880 --> 01:53:46.880]  It's a right to due process.
[01:53:46.880 --> 01:53:48.880]  I'll explain, I'll explain.
[01:53:48.880 --> 01:53:58.880]  It's like when you get to court and the judge does not, does not the law to the facts of the case.
[01:53:58.880 --> 01:54:00.880]  I'm missing a word.
[01:54:00.880 --> 01:54:05.880]  Oh, failed to properly apply the law to the facts.
[01:54:05.880 --> 01:54:06.880]  Yes.
[01:54:06.880 --> 01:54:09.880]  See, now in a case like that, that's what you call that.
[01:54:09.880 --> 01:54:10.880]  That's what he did.
[01:54:10.880 --> 01:54:12.880]  And that's a class A misdemeanor.
[01:54:12.880 --> 01:54:15.880]  Are they guilty of anything?
[01:54:15.880 --> 01:54:17.880]  Do they be sued?
[01:54:17.880 --> 01:54:21.880]  Official misconduct denied you due process.
[01:54:21.880 --> 01:54:22.880]  That's what I'm looking for.
[01:54:22.880 --> 01:54:23.880]  Okay.
[01:54:23.880 --> 01:54:24.880]  Official misconduct.
[01:54:24.880 --> 01:54:27.880]  He failed to apply the facts.
[01:54:27.880 --> 01:54:29.880]  Failed to apply a lot of the facts of the case.
[01:54:29.880 --> 01:54:31.880]  Is that what he did?
[01:54:31.880 --> 01:54:32.880]  Yes.
[01:54:32.880 --> 01:54:35.880]  No, no, that's, you're talking about a different issue here.
[01:54:35.880 --> 01:54:36.880]  Okay.
[01:54:36.880 --> 01:54:53.880]  The court, the clerk and the judge denied you notice that a order had been filed and since your time to file an appeal is restricted, you were denied in your right to an appeal.
[01:54:53.880 --> 01:54:55.880]  That's the language I'm looking for.
[01:54:55.880 --> 01:54:56.880]  Thank you.
[01:54:56.880 --> 01:54:57.880]  Perfect.
[01:54:57.880 --> 01:55:00.880]  All right.
[01:55:00.880 --> 01:55:02.880]  I don't know what this point.
[01:55:02.880 --> 01:55:11.880]  It's going to be 25 a.m. I'm fried because I start my day around four in the morning.
[01:55:11.880 --> 01:55:21.880]  So I can understand what you were saying before about being fried working from two in the morning.
[01:55:21.880 --> 01:55:25.880]  Any other tips, any other advice?
[01:55:25.880 --> 01:55:36.880]  All I'm going to say is, in one sentence, I get news for 40 years when I tell you that this county is probably one of the most corrupt in the country.
[01:55:36.880 --> 01:55:37.880]  I know there's others.
[01:55:37.880 --> 01:55:45.880]  I know that other things terrible happen, but this one was consistently in the news for a long time.
[01:55:45.880 --> 01:55:56.880]  The New York Times carried an article about the New York court and how corrupt they are and how they are a bunch of dummies.
[01:55:56.880 --> 01:56:04.880]  And how many criminal charges have you filed against the judge?
[01:56:04.880 --> 01:56:20.880]  He contacted the commission on judicial conduct. He filed with another magistrate, a higher magistrate, and filed two charges against the judge.
[01:56:20.880 --> 01:56:27.880]  And in each case, I've got to find out this whole thing is such a mess.
[01:56:27.880 --> 01:56:29.880]  And I am so tired.
[01:56:29.880 --> 01:56:36.880]  No, no, no. Keep telling us the facts and you keep slipping in to meta comments. Stay with the facts.
[01:56:36.880 --> 01:56:43.880]  I know. All right. Here are the facts. He threw a couple of charges at the judge with another magistrate.
[01:56:43.880 --> 01:56:52.880]  And I can't remember how that turned out, but I think he pooped it if I'm not mistaken.
[01:56:52.880 --> 01:56:59.880]  So we've got a lot of work ahead of us and I want to get these people. I want to get these people.
[01:56:59.880 --> 01:57:07.880]  You're not understanding the process. Your file complaints with another judge and he poopes it. That's what you want.
[01:57:07.880 --> 01:57:09.880]  Because now you get to file against that judge.
[01:57:09.880 --> 01:57:16.880]  No, no, no. I agree. I agree. I agree. But I want to know the next and the next and the next. What you do next.
[01:57:16.880 --> 01:57:19.880]  You just go up the ladder.
[01:57:19.880 --> 01:57:25.880]  Okay, now that's what I don't understand. I don't understand what the ladder is.
[01:57:25.880 --> 01:57:28.880]  The next higher level judge.
[01:57:28.880 --> 01:57:34.880]  Okay. He's going to file this with the appellate judge in Rochester, New York.
[01:57:34.880 --> 01:57:38.880]  Good. And then if they blow it off, file it with the Supreme.
[01:57:38.880 --> 01:57:43.880]  And then if they blow it off, file against all of them with the New York Attorney General.
[01:57:43.880 --> 01:57:47.880]  And when he blows it off, then you take it to the feds.
[01:57:47.880 --> 01:57:50.880]  And that would be the FBI?
[01:57:50.880 --> 01:57:55.880]  FBI. The Special Agent in Charge.
[01:57:55.880 --> 01:58:00.880]  That's the only one whose name you could get. You file it with him directly.
[01:58:00.880 --> 01:58:03.880]  And this all creates politics.
[01:58:03.880 --> 01:58:09.880]  You've got guys being charged with crimes that didn't have anything to do with what started all this.
[01:58:09.880 --> 01:58:17.880]  And they're going to be P.O. with it, the guy that got this started, because now they got these guys involved in their mess.
[01:58:17.880 --> 01:58:19.880]  It's politics.
[01:58:19.880 --> 01:58:22.880]  Okay. All right. We are out of time.
[01:58:22.880 --> 01:58:27.880]  Red Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio. Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:27.880 --> 01:58:31.880]  And Tina and Shane, I'm sorry we didn't get to you. It's kind of my fault.
[01:58:31.880 --> 01:58:35.880]  I'm a little brain dead today and I took too much time on some issues.
[01:58:35.880 --> 01:58:38.880]  I shouldn't have. I apologize for that.
[01:58:38.880 --> 01:58:43.880]  Shane, Tina, if you want to call me off the air tomorrow, I'll address whatever you have.
[01:58:43.880 --> 01:58:49.880]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:49.880 --> 01:58:57.880]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.880 --> 01:59:04.880]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.880 --> 01:59:11.880]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.880 --> 01:59:20.880]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.880 --> 01:59:25.880]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:25.880 --> 01:59:29.880]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.880 --> 01:59:35.880]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:35.880 --> 01:59:40.880]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.880 --> 01:59:59.880]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.