ROL_2019-07-22_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.840]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli
[00:05.840 --> 00:13.560]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.560 --> 00:17.160]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:17.160 --> 00:23.160]  Markets for Wednesday the 26th of June 2019, open with precious metals, gold in $1,407.70
[00:23.160 --> 00:29.840]  an ounce, silver $15.25 an ounce, copper $2.73 an ounce, platinum $808 an ounce, oil $1.50
[00:29.840 --> 00:35.920]  a bottle, Texas crude $57.83 a barrel, Brent crude $55.05 a barrel, and the top five cryptos
[00:35.920 --> 00:44.240]  in order of market cap, Bitcoin at $12,707 a coin, Ethereum $332.57 a coin, XRP Ripple
[00:44.240 --> 00:55.120]  $47.00 a coin, Bitcoin Cash $494.00 a coin, and Lite coins at $135.40 a crypto coin.
[00:55.120 --> 00:59.720]  Today in history, the year 1870, the Roman Catholic holiday of Christmas has declared
[00:59.720 --> 01:02.520]  it a federal holiday in the United States.
[01:02.520 --> 01:03.520]  Today in history.
[01:03.520 --> 01:11.800]  In recent news, Representative Michael Burgess, Republican from the 26th Texas Congressional
[01:11.800 --> 01:15.880]  District, centering in Denton County, defended the controversial conditions in which the
[01:15.880 --> 01:21.480]  facilities being used to house child immigrants are supposedly found in on MSNVC earlier this
[01:21.480 --> 01:22.480]  week.
[01:22.480 --> 01:26.760]  The commentator stated, quote, I've been to Casa Padre in Brownsville, Texas, and yes,
[01:26.760 --> 01:31.520]  it's a restored Walmart, and you know what, there's not a lock on the door.
[01:31.520 --> 01:34.600]  Any child is free to leave at any time, but they don't.
[01:34.600 --> 01:35.600]  You know why?
[01:35.600 --> 01:40.480]  Because they are well taken care of, and that they are, quote, free to leave at any time.
[01:40.480 --> 01:44.240]  Apparently children must leave the facility with a parent or guardian who has passed a
[01:44.240 --> 01:48.160]  background check if they wish to stay in the United States, but the child is free to leave
[01:48.160 --> 01:53.840]  by themselves if they return to where they came from.
[01:53.840 --> 01:57.920]  General Motors Company is planning on investing $20 million at its Arlington Assembly plant
[01:57.920 --> 02:02.000]  in order to fit it to build the next generation of GM's full-size SUVs.
[02:02.000 --> 02:06.680]  Gerald Johnson, GM Executive Vice President of Global Manufacturing, stated that, quote,
[02:06.680 --> 02:10.280]  we've been building trucks in Texas for more than 20 years, and our additional investment
[02:10.280 --> 02:14.920]  in Arlington Assembly is proof of our commitment and confidence in our Arlington team.
[02:14.920 --> 02:19.880]  The automaker built the Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban, the GMC Yukon and Yukon XL, and
[02:19.880 --> 02:27.560]  the Cadillac Escalade at the 250-acre Arlington plant.
[02:27.560 --> 02:31.120]  Findings in a report released by the insurance company Allstate looked into collision claims
[02:31.120 --> 02:32.640]  across the U.S.
[02:32.640 --> 02:38.400]  Two Texas cities made the list of safest cities to drive in, with Laredo at number 5 and McAllen
[02:38.400 --> 02:39.400]  at number 9.
[02:39.400 --> 02:41.400]  So let's keep driving safe, Texas.
[02:41.400 --> 02:45.400]  The Lowdowners' crew looked at the sponsors, never crying through a service that's an
[02:45.400 --> 02:50.400]  advertisement, feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrody.com, that's rickrodyrohdd.com.
[02:50.400 --> 03:01.400]  This was the Lowdown for June 26, 2019.
[03:01.400 --> 03:12.400]  The Lowdowners' crew looked at the sponsors, never crying through a service that's an advertisement,
[03:12.400 --> 03:23.400]  feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrody.com, that's rickrody.com.
[03:23.400 --> 03:33.400]  The Lowdowners' crew looked at the sponsors, never crying through a service that's an advertisement,
[03:33.400 --> 03:43.400]  feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrody.com, that's rickrody.com.
[03:43.400 --> 03:53.400]  The Lowdowners' crew looked at the sponsors, never crying through a service that's an advertisement,
[03:53.400 --> 04:03.400]  feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrody.com, that's rickrody.com.
[04:03.400 --> 04:13.400]  The Lowdowners' crew looked at the sponsors, never crying through a service that's an advertisement,
[04:13.400 --> 04:23.400]  feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrody.com, that's rickrody.com.
[04:23.400 --> 04:33.400]  The Lowdowners' crew looked at the sponsors, never crying through a service that's an advertisement,
[04:33.400 --> 04:43.400]  feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrody.com, that's rickrody.com.
[04:43.400 --> 04:51.400]  The Lowdowners' crew looked at the sponsors, never crying through a service that's an advertisement,
[04:51.400 --> 05:01.400]  feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrody.com, that's rickrody.com.
[05:01.400 --> 05:11.400]  The Lowdowners' crew looked at the sponsors, never crying through a service that's an advertisement,
[05:11.400 --> 05:19.400]  feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrody.com, that's rickrody.com.
[05:19.400 --> 05:25.400]  Okay, without in this case being either outside of or excluded from.
[05:25.400 --> 05:34.400]  Okay, not without it as it being applied to us because it is constantly being applied to us, whether we want it to be or have actually deserve it to be or not.
[05:34.400 --> 05:41.400]  So, that said, I want to go into a couple of things that I've posted, and these are from a couple of different discussions.
[05:41.400 --> 05:43.400]  I'm not going to name any individuals.
[05:43.400 --> 05:51.400]  I'm just simply going to go over the issue as I wrote it and as will be put into the seminar book as I'm completing it.
[05:51.400 --> 05:56.400]  So, just to go over this, pay attention to what I'm reading here and why I'm reading it.
[05:56.400 --> 06:04.400]  In one comment, a gentleman made the commentary that the state has the right to regulate all forms of transportation that occur within its borders.
[06:04.400 --> 06:13.400]  Well, that's true, provided we know what transportation means, hence the reason for my response.
[06:13.400 --> 06:20.400]  Please provide a link to the actual enacted law where the state itself has defined the singular term transportation.
[06:20.400 --> 06:39.400]  Even more importantly, where that definition of transportation encompasses the private personal business and pleasure activities of the general public in using the roads rather than only the activities of individuals and businesses that use the roads as a place of business for private profit or gain,
[06:39.400 --> 06:47.400]  such as carriers and those who act and use motor vehicles as operators and drivers for such purposes.
[06:47.400 --> 06:57.400]  You are talking about two distinctive things if they are one and the same, those things being the supervision of traffic and the regulation of traffic.
[06:57.400 --> 07:05.400]  Supervision is limited to the routing and control of the flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic for the general safety of the public.
[07:05.400 --> 07:12.400]  This is where the laws regulating physical signage and signals serve their intended purposes.
[07:12.400 --> 07:28.400]  Regulation is limited to laws that govern and regulate licensing, inspections, financial responsibility, and any other kinds of laws that are directed at charging fees for state permission to engage in the activity or business for private profit or gain,
[07:28.400 --> 07:34.400]  or any laws providing for punitive penalties via fines and fees for noncompliance.
[07:34.400 --> 07:43.400]  The privilege that the courts keep going on about is the privilege of using the roadways as a place of business for private profit or gain.
[07:43.400 --> 07:58.400]  It is not the general public who is doing nothing more than engaging in the free exercise and enjoyment of their right to live and care for themselves and families by being able to move freely about the land in their own private conveyances.
[07:58.400 --> 08:11.400]  It is that latter use and rights that the higher courts in every state and at the federal level have addressed or they have addressed and recognized on numerous previous occasions,
[08:11.400 --> 08:26.400]  and that the current state courts have decided to totally ignore and whitewash because they have managed to brainwash the general public and their law students into believing that virtually everything is a privilege subject to government approval.
[08:26.400 --> 08:43.400]  What I find most amazing is how the current state and federal courts try to obfuscate the higher court opinions on this subject by referencing anything written therein that supports how they want it to be read and enforced within their respective state as part of the actual opinion,
[08:43.400 --> 08:55.400]  but declaring any part that proves negative to their desired position and interpretive rewrite of the actual law as mere dicta within the opinion and not relevant to the final decision.
[08:55.400 --> 09:07.400]  This is the difference between remedial law, law enacted to provide a means of obtaining remedy to people and businesses in cases involving injury, death or property damage, and other law.
[09:07.400 --> 09:19.400]  The administrative regulations and the privilege argument can only be properly used against those who are acting under that privilege by using public property, i.e. the roads for private profit and gain.
[09:19.400 --> 09:28.400]  Like virtually every other right of the people that the government and the courts have worked so hard to undermine or destroy, this one is no different.
[09:28.400 --> 09:40.400]  A bit of hard digging and historical research will show that the law is actually valid as it is written because it is written with a limited application to those who are engaged in the actual privileged activity,
[09:40.400 --> 09:49.400]  not the one being exercised as a fundamental right of locomotion for the people's own private business and pleasure.
[09:49.400 --> 10:03.400]  It is the courts themselves who are constantly legislating from the bench to rewrite the constitutions and the law to suit the outcome and public perceptions that they and their governmental cronies want.
[10:03.400 --> 10:22.400]  Their interpretations and opinions are now linguistically engineered to serve themselves instead of pronouncing a legal and lawful conclusion that is in accordance with both the purpose and intent of each state constitution and the actual law as written and properly interpreted.
[10:22.400 --> 10:34.400]  They intentionally avoid interpretations that place any kind of strict limitations upon governmental power and authority and that would best protect the individual rights belonging to we the people,
[10:34.400 --> 10:44.400]  despite the fact that those rights existed long before there was even a government created and then began to steadfastly undermine and destroy them.
[10:44.400 --> 10:54.400]  In the face of all the lies and deceptions about the law that is being promulgated by those who control the flow of information and formulate the practices that comprise it,
[10:54.400 --> 11:04.400]  your straight A's don't really mean much, especially when you aren't willing to look past the fallacies of what you are being led by the nose and told to believe.
[11:04.400 --> 11:18.400]  Anyone with a mind of his or her own should always be willing and able to take a really hard and logical examination into the reality of what should be blatantly obvious to any rights and liberty minded individual
[11:18.400 --> 11:36.400]  while asking the all important question of how is it possible for any government that was created with a binding duty to serve and protect the people and their inherent individual rights and property to do something that harms and deprives every single one of those same people
[11:36.400 --> 11:48.400]  of a common everyday life and livelihood sustaining necessity unless the people pay a fee to get government permission via a license to exercise their right to it.
[11:48.400 --> 11:58.400]  Okay, now that was the first response to an individual making that comment regarding transportation in the state's ability to regulate it within its territorial borders,
[11:58.400 --> 12:04.400]  which I have no argument with as long as we understand what the term transportation actually means.
[12:04.400 --> 12:27.400]  When you use it as an overly broad all encompassing statement of fact that gathers everything that happens in a car under the same umbrella, we have a problem and you are misreading the law and you are misunderstanding the terminology and how it applies and to whom it applies.
[12:27.400 --> 12:39.400]  And that ladies and gentlemen is a failing that I have been trying for years to correct not only in the governmental community, but in our community of the people.
[12:39.400 --> 12:57.400]  Because if we can't sit on a jury informed of this information so we can tell the state I'm not going to convict that person of this offense because the offense doesn't apply to them because you haven't shown they were engaged in transportation to begin with.
[12:57.400 --> 13:14.400]  Well, I'm not really sure what I'm doing here if that's not what I'm trying to accomplish and how you're going to apply it when we do it. I mean, that's the whole purpose of this to educate you so that you can better serve everyone by better serving yourself,
[13:14.400 --> 13:33.400]  especially if you are put on a jury in such a case. And it hopefully it will give you pause and desire to look and be analytical about all the facts that are raised in any other kind of case where the state is the one trying to prove somebody did something wrong.
[13:33.400 --> 13:46.400]  Because when the state does this in these cases, it is always about the money. Very rarely do these cases involve damage to persons or property. Rarely.
[13:46.400 --> 13:56.400]  And the purpose of remedial law is not so the state can punish and collect money for it. And thus the person who's actually harm gets nothing.
[13:56.400 --> 14:16.400]  It was never intended that the state profit from this. That's why it's remedial law. It was meant to give remedy to the individual who was harmed by defining how the act itself that caused the harm was unlawful, thus giving them the ability to have a cause of action
[14:16.400 --> 14:31.400]  and a valid legal claim to restitution and recompense for their injury or their damages. That's what remedial law is for. And that is what these regulatory statutes are supposed to be.
[14:31.400 --> 14:47.400]  Now, I've only got two and a half minutes for the next one. So I'm going to start on the second comment before I move to the other before we go to the break. And then I move into the second segment. And hopefully I'll get it finished in the second segment when we start taking your calls if anyone shows up on the board.
[14:47.400 --> 14:57.400]  Again, 512-646-1984 is the calling number. The phone bridge is up. Everything is on. So if you want to call and get in line, please do so now.
[14:57.400 --> 15:17.400]  All right. In another Facebook comment, an individual made the statement, you are driving a commercial vehicle if it has a plate on it. If we actually learn how to read and understand the laws associated with the privileged regulated activity known as transportation, we can readily see that this is a completely incorrect statement on its face.
[15:17.400 --> 15:32.400]  We could determine that by some rather simple examinations and observations about the terminology and how it is used and defined within the statutes themselves.
[15:32.400 --> 15:55.400]  The term commercial vehicle is actually defined and used as commercial motor vehicle, not just commercial vehicle. And it is a term of art that is specifically defined in the statutes as a specific weight or passenger class, meaning 26,001 pounds or more or 16 or more passengers, including the driver, respectively.
[15:55.400 --> 16:19.400]  Or that bears a hazardous materials placard. Under this definition, a taxicab shuttle van or a chauffeur car limousine, a delivery truck or car or van are not considered to be a commercial motor vehicle under the statutes, even though they are being used for commercial purposes.
[16:19.400 --> 16:38.400]  Everybody understand that? Even though they are being used for commercial purposes, they do not fall within the classification of a commercial motor vehicle because they are not in the correct weight class, they are not in the correct passenger capacity, or they are not bearing a hazardous materials placard in order to haul hazardous materials.
[16:38.400 --> 16:52.400]  So they are not commercial motor vehicles, even though they are being commercially used. Alright folks, we are going to take a break. Pick this up on the other side. Y'all hang on and we will be right back, 512-646-1984.
[16:52.400 --> 17:19.400]  Rule of Law Radio, we shall return.
[17:19.400 --> 17:45.400]  Rule of Law Radio, we shall return.
[17:45.400 --> 18:14.400]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris proven method. Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:14.400 --> 18:33.400]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.400 --> 18:49.400]  The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.400 --> 19:00.400]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:00.400 --> 19:10.400]  You can explore listening to the Logos Radio Network at yahoo.com.
[19:30.400 --> 19:52.400]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. The call-in number is 512-646-1984. If y'all want to call and get in line, and I'm going to continue on with this.
[19:52.400 --> 20:07.400]  All right, the term vehicle in its singular form is itself defined as a device that is self-propelled and used upon a highway to transport persons or property. The terms vehicle and used are also terms of art within the statute.
[20:07.400 --> 20:27.400]  Terms of art which are then used to define the singular terms commercial motor vehicle or vehicle. It is the use of the device that is self-propelled that determines whether or not an automobile or other form of personal conveyance can legally be classified as a vehicle
[20:27.400 --> 20:40.400]  in order to be included in any other definition involving the inclusion of the term vehicle. The use is what is commercial in nature and is actually the privileged activity that is being legislatively and congressionally regulated.
[20:40.400 --> 21:06.400]  Not specifically the device itself that is self-propelled or the device is merely an object of the law while the commercial use is the subject matter of the law. And the subject matter of the legislation is always the primary element that must be alleged and proven in order to invoke the legal authority of any other provision in the statutes that are written under that subject matter.
[21:06.400 --> 21:24.400]  Just like you can't charge someone with murder without first being able to show that someone is dead and their death was ruled a homicide by the ME, the state cannot legitimately allege that a person was engaged in a subject matter regulated activity without first having proof of that subject
[21:24.400 --> 21:44.400]  matter even being applicable. Just like blood on someone's floor or clothes is not proof of murder or assault in and of itself, traveling in one's private automobile or personal conveyance is not proof or probable cause to believe that someone is engaged in commercial use of the highways for private profit or gain.
[21:44.400 --> 22:04.400]  Another perfect example of your argument being logically incorrect and false can be made by simply making reference to a fishing license. Can you purchase such license in any state? Yes. Does the possession of such license automatically mean that you are always fishing under the terms of the license?
[22:04.400 --> 22:16.400]  No. If you purchase fish in your local supermarket, do you need a license or are you presumed to be acting under the permissive authority of a fishing license you may or may not have? Again, no.
[22:16.400 --> 22:42.400]  Are you required to have any such license to fish in a private body of water owned by yourself or someone else? Again, the answer is no. So if the license is not always required or validly presumed to always be in use simply because you may have it, then you cannot be automatically presumed to be using it for the purpose it was purchased for.
[22:42.400 --> 22:57.400]  How is this set of circumstances and conditions any less true or relevant when it comes to any other type of license when the actual intended use purpose of the license is not observable from a distance or is entirely nonexistent?
[22:57.400 --> 23:20.400]  The real problem is that the courts refuse to even raise, examine into or address this perspective. So an inquisitive person concerned with true, right and wrong should be asking why? The only logical answer is because it blows their system of control and revenue streams from false and malicious prosecutions completely to bits.
[23:20.400 --> 23:39.400]  A thorough examining into these points proves the existence of a massive and willing fraud upon the people by the very actors and institutions that are supposed to be protecting us from these things, not engaging in ongoing criminal enterprise to keep it alive and hidden.
[23:39.400 --> 23:50.400]  And ladies and gentlemen, there is nothing more factually verifiable and true than that information right there when it comes to this specific subject matter.
[23:50.400 --> 24:14.400]  This is about fraud. This is about the state's willingness to engage in that fraud. This is about the state's desire to take revenue from our pockets to sustain itself in violation of the Constitution of the state of Texas and those of the other states as well as that of the United States.
[24:14.400 --> 24:36.400]  Okay? The states got their authority to regulate transportation as a commercial enterprise through federal law. There is no question of that because the states themselves are not free to regulate commercial activity if it goes in or out of the state from another state or some foreign country.
[24:36.400 --> 25:02.400]  That is the sole domain of the federal government, period. So to say that their authority to regulate commerce within the state is not derived from the federal law, especially when it involves carriers, drivers, and operators who work as or for such carriers that cross
[25:02.400 --> 25:15.400]  state lines or international lines is complete balderdash. That is exactly where their authority comes from.
[25:15.400 --> 25:41.400]  And while it is true that the state can add to that as far as the law is concerned for those commercial activities that are maintained strictly within its territorial borders, there is still the distinction to be made between local forms of commercial activity and forms of entirely private and personal activity.
[25:41.400 --> 25:55.400]  Even though those activities may be very similar in fact and circumstance, the similarity does not make them the same. The fishing license example is a perfect example of that.
[25:55.400 --> 26:13.400]  If I go to someone's pond on their land or their lake on their land that they paid the stock and it's their fish and their water and their land and so on and so forth, I do not need a license from the state to use it to fish in it and to eat and catch it, eat whatever is in it.
[26:13.400 --> 26:35.400]  I get out of it. I don't need their permission. I don't need their license. And since the roads themselves are held in trust by the state for the rightful use of the people, not the rightful use of businesses, then I have the same right to engage and travel upon those roads as I do to fish in that
[26:35.400 --> 27:03.400]  private pond. Even though the roads themselves are public, they are held in trust for me, for you, for each of us. We are mutual beneficiaries of it. The state is not. Therefore, for the state to say that we must ask them for permission to use that which we are the rightful inherent beneficiaries of is fraud.
[27:03.400 --> 27:16.400]  It is theft. It is extortion. It is sedition. It is official oppression. It is abuse of official capacity.
[27:16.400 --> 27:45.400]  The whole purpose of me being here and telling you this is to get you to see and understand that for exactly what it is. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is exactly what it is. It is crime and it is being engaged in, perpetuated and just is there solely so the state can stick its hands in pockets.
[27:45.400 --> 27:49.400]  That its fingers were never permitted to enter.
[27:49.400 --> 28:16.400]  Constitutionally speaking, the only way that the government can get money from the pockets of the people directly is through valid forms of taxation authorized by the Constitution. If the Constitution does not authorize it, they can't tax it.
[28:16.400 --> 28:33.400]  The problem is that it makes the absolutely untenable presumption that one individual has the right to stick his hands in someone else's pocket and to take out whatever he may find or wish to have and call it his own.
[28:33.400 --> 29:00.400]  And, ladies and gentlemen, is the problem with saying the Constitution authorizes the government to tax the people directly because there is no difference between the guy with the gun stuck to your head and a dark alley telling you to empty your pockets than there is for the government to be doing the exact same thing in the light of day to do the exact same thing.
[29:00.400 --> 29:14.400]  If you don't understand that, then we really do have a problem in this country and it isn't just the government.
[29:14.400 --> 29:25.400]  We have failed as a nation and as a people when we cannot see this for what it is and we are not willing to act upon it for what it is.
[29:25.400 --> 29:40.400]  When we choose to remain ignorant of the facts for reasons of plausible deniability, then we may have a problem above and beyond that of just a bad government.
[29:40.400 --> 29:43.400]  You need to think about that because it's a problem.
[29:43.400 --> 30:01.400]  All right, ladies and gentlemen, we're about to take a break. Y'all hang in there and we will be right back. 512-646-1984.
[30:01.400 --> 30:14.400]  Please scan your next item. That annoying mechanical voice from the self-checkout lane may soon be silenced for good. I'm Dr. Catherine Albright and I'll have great news on the death of computerized cashiers next.
[30:31.400 --> 30:57.400]  Apparently, I'm not the only one who hates the self-serve checkstants at stores. After a decade of trying them, retailers are finally acknowledging studies that say shoppers would rather dodge the self-serve lane and head for a human cashier.
[30:57.400 --> 31:09.400]  Today, just 16% of grocery store transactions go through self-checkout lanes. That's down from a high of 22% three years ago. Shoppers say they're more satisfied when they pay people, not cold computers.
[31:09.400 --> 31:22.400]  In response, grocery chains like Big Y and Albertsons plan to bag the do-it-yourself option and bring back customer service. Hooray! Now, if only they dump the purchase tracking cards, I mean membership cards.
[31:22.400 --> 31:28.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albright. More news and information at CatherineAlbright.com.
[31:52.400 --> 32:12.400]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[32:12.400 --> 32:22.400]  Now, I'd be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[32:22.400 --> 32:33.400]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[32:33.400 --> 32:46.400]  Call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[32:46.400 --> 32:59.400]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[32:59.400 --> 33:04.400]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[33:30.400 --> 33:41.400]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:41.400 --> 33:50.400]  I'm starting to get worried that the phones ain't working until I saw somebody pop up here on the caller bridge because no one is online, and normally the phone bridge is full by now.
[33:50.400 --> 34:01.400]  That's okay. I'll sit here and die a trial ball night if that's what it takes, even though I'm going to wander a little bit because I only prepared for that first segment and a half or two in this case.
[34:01.400 --> 34:09.400]  All right, that said, the first and only caller we have on the board right now is Pat. So let's go to Pat in Texas. Pat, what can we do for you?
[34:09.400 --> 34:13.400]  Oh, not a whole lot. You have a good evening.
[34:13.400 --> 34:15.400]  All right, so far, how about you?
[34:15.400 --> 34:18.400]  Oh, nice and warm out here in West Texas.
[34:18.400 --> 34:20.400]  Yeah, same here.
[34:20.400 --> 34:30.400]  The things that your correspondent there was talking about was a license plate. You know, there's different types of license plates.
[34:30.400 --> 34:39.400]  I have disabled veteran plates on my van, and they are a gift that's listed in the statute.
[34:39.400 --> 34:50.400]  It's a gift from the state to the veterans for things that they have suffered. Yeah, I pay $7 a year for it.
[34:50.400 --> 34:56.400]  Okay, it's an administrative fee, including an inspection.
[34:56.400 --> 35:06.400]  But it's listed in there that it is for the private use of the veteran and his or her family.
[35:06.400 --> 35:13.400]  It's stated just like that. It cannot be used in commercial purposes.
[35:13.400 --> 35:14.400]  Right.
[35:14.400 --> 35:22.400]  Yeah, I've gotten stopped a couple of times and had a discussion on the side of the road, but I'm not going to say the brightest tool in the shed,
[35:22.400 --> 35:33.400]  but one young man told me that there's a prima facia evidence of them being able to do whatever they need to do for traffic.
[35:33.400 --> 35:46.400]  Well, prima facia is one thing until it is an assumed position, until it is challenged at which point it must be proven.
[35:46.400 --> 35:50.400]  Yeah, it's no longer prima facia once it's challenged.
[35:50.400 --> 35:56.400]  Yeah, and he didn't want to go down that rabbit hole with me.
[35:56.400 --> 36:03.400]  What they never do when they make claims, they can't actually support with anything substantive outside of their opinion.
[36:03.400 --> 36:08.400]  And unfortunately too many of them think their opinion is all that matters.
[36:08.400 --> 36:15.400]  Yeah, well, they have that badge and they have that 40 caliber and it's a hollow point.
[36:15.400 --> 36:25.400]  And if you're facing it the wrong way, it has a tendency to be a convincing item.
[36:25.400 --> 36:36.400]  There are just a few moments that you need it for, but one of the things that is also there is we're guaranteed a Republican form of government
[36:36.400 --> 36:45.400]  and our law is based upon the common law as it was in England at the time of the founding of the country.
[36:45.400 --> 36:56.400]  And I was just reading some Supreme Court cases that a friend of mine sent me over from Utah and Montana.
[36:56.400 --> 37:07.400]  And they go into some detail about what they consider the common law including the rights to travel is very, very enlightening.
[37:07.400 --> 37:16.400]  You've been to a lot of people, if they understood the terminology, they're all terms of art as we all know.
[37:16.400 --> 37:27.400]  And what that common law was based upon and what was understood at the time the law was accepted as the basis for this country,
[37:27.400 --> 37:38.400]  not just every state but also the entire country, even though most of our fine illustrious public servants are no longer adhering to it
[37:38.400 --> 37:46.400]  or they'll debate the issue with you for about 38 seconds before they just slam the hammer down.
[37:46.400 --> 37:57.400]  But the common law is not just random things thrown down.
[37:57.400 --> 38:01.400]  It was actually written and well understood.
[38:01.400 --> 38:18.400]  It's like our rights, our founding fathers had almost 700 years of history knowing what their rights were and where they came from, came out in a written document in 1100 called the Proclamation of 1100.
[38:18.400 --> 38:22.400]  Most people have never heard of it because they don't choose to read.
[38:22.400 --> 38:29.400]  And history teaches you things that you have to have for this day and age.
[38:29.400 --> 38:37.400]  And if you don't know your history, you're starting off on the wrong foot.
[38:37.400 --> 38:39.400]  I'm going to leave it at that.
[38:39.400 --> 38:46.400]  Yeah, you're starting off not only on the wrong foot and the reason for it being that you're completely uninformed.
[38:46.400 --> 38:51.400]  You're basing everything on what you think you know instead of what is actually true.
[38:51.400 --> 38:58.400]  And that's the biggest problem we have with every judge and attorney in this state and every other state.
[38:58.400 --> 39:00.400]  You've noticed.
[39:00.400 --> 39:03.400]  Yeah, it's exactly what Uncle Remus says.
[39:03.400 --> 39:05.400]  It ain't what you know for sure that puts a hurting on you.
[39:05.400 --> 39:10.400]  It's what you know for sure that just ain't so that really messes with you.
[39:10.400 --> 39:16.400]  Yeah, that's where you touch that tar baby and get thrown in the braor patch.
[39:16.400 --> 39:23.400]  Anyway, any LHB, you have a good night and I hope everybody calls in.
[39:23.400 --> 39:26.400]  Sometimes entertaining from this side anyway.
[39:26.400 --> 39:28.400]  Yeah, I know.
[39:28.400 --> 39:33.400]  But right now you're the only one up here and no one else seems is either listening or wants to call in.
[39:33.400 --> 39:34.400]  But we'll see how it goes.
[39:34.400 --> 39:39.400]  I'll keep talking until somebody does or the show is over one of the two.
[39:39.400 --> 39:40.400]  Okay.
[39:40.400 --> 39:41.400]  All right.
[39:41.400 --> 39:42.400]  Thanks for calling in Pat.
[39:42.400 --> 39:43.400]  You have a good one.
[39:43.400 --> 39:44.400]  You too.
[39:44.400 --> 39:46.400]  Bye bye.
[39:46.400 --> 39:47.400]  All right.
[39:47.400 --> 39:49.400]  That was Pat in Texas.
[39:49.400 --> 39:53.400]  Now while I've got you all here doing absolutely nothing but listening to my voice.
[39:53.400 --> 39:57.400]  Please, once again, the fundraiser for the network is ongoing.
[39:57.400 --> 40:00.400]  Please donate as much as you can as often as you can.
[40:00.400 --> 40:02.400]  Recurring payments are great and all that.
[40:02.400 --> 40:10.400]  Just however you can set it up to keep us included in your financial well wishes because you have to understand without you, we can't stay here.
[40:10.400 --> 40:12.400]  We can't be here.
[40:12.400 --> 40:16.400]  You are what makes this network and what we do possible.
[40:16.400 --> 40:19.400]  If you don't fund us, then guess what?
[40:19.400 --> 40:20.400]  We lose.
[40:20.400 --> 40:22.400]  You lose.
[40:22.400 --> 40:31.400]  Because there's no one else out there doing what we do to bring this information to the forefront and put it in your hands.
[40:31.400 --> 40:34.400]  I do this on this radio show.
[40:34.400 --> 40:36.400]  I do this on my legal blog.
[40:36.400 --> 40:48.400]  I do this with my seminar material to try to raise funds when and where I can for the network and hopefully enough for myself besides I'm working to get a second version of it updated and out.
[40:48.400 --> 40:51.400]  But there is so much to this.
[40:51.400 --> 41:03.400]  If you think child-proofing a house from a gaggle of children is a difficult prospect, try idiot-proofing the subject of law.
[41:03.400 --> 41:04.400]  Okay?
[41:04.400 --> 41:12.400]  Try that because you ain't got to just worry about the layman out there who are trying to get their toes wet and understand this subject.
[41:12.400 --> 41:20.400]  You got to worry about the idiots who actually have a degree and sit on the bench and practice law with this subject.
[41:20.400 --> 41:36.400]  Now that has been my completely disappointing experience that they are the ones that are usually the most deprived of intellect and reasoning ability when it comes to anything relating to law.
[41:36.400 --> 41:44.400]  They know only what they think they know and they enforce it solely with their opinion of what they think they know.
[41:44.400 --> 41:54.400]  And that is all the substantive evidence and necessity they need to do the things they do no matter how wrong they actually are.
[41:54.400 --> 42:14.400]  And the problem with that is that nine times out of ten the courts above them will promulgate the exact same misconceptions, misconstruction of law, misconstruing of intent and intentional deception that was engaged in by the prosecutors and the court at the trial level.
[42:14.400 --> 42:33.400]  That, ladies and gentlemen, is what you're facing and because it's what you're facing and because I have experienced firsthand in knowing that's what you're facing and having been where all of you are eventually or have already been because of it, I decided to do something about it.
[42:33.400 --> 42:35.400]  That's how I wound up here.
[42:35.400 --> 42:38.400]  I was invited to join this network.
[42:38.400 --> 42:40.400]  I didn't ask to join it.
[42:40.400 --> 42:44.400]  They invited me to join it.
[42:44.400 --> 42:45.400]  Why?
[42:45.400 --> 43:04.400]  Because they thought I had something to contribute after I had called in as one of you, a regular caller, several times to ask specific questions and to bring specific information I had found within the law regarding those questions to light on this show.
[43:04.400 --> 43:13.400]  They invited me on not only as a caller, but one time as a guest. Then shortly after I was a guest, they asked me to become a co-host.
[43:13.400 --> 43:15.400]  And here I am.
[43:15.400 --> 43:20.400]  And I've been here for, well, over a decade now to tell the truth.
[43:20.400 --> 43:23.400]  And I've been here since 2008.
[43:23.400 --> 43:28.400]  So if not a little, and I was called in before then.
[43:28.400 --> 43:34.400]  So that being said, you can understand why I am passionate about this.
[43:34.400 --> 43:36.400]  This is not where I saw my life leading.
[43:36.400 --> 43:39.400]  This is not what I wanted to do with it.
[43:39.400 --> 43:51.400]  But the truth be told, this kind of works in a way that I'll get with you on the other side of the breakabout and then I'll start taking the other callers that has suddenly popped up on the board.
[43:51.400 --> 44:00.400]  512-646-1984, we will be right back so y'all hang in there.
[44:00.400 --> 44:03.400]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.400 --> 44:14.400]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, death by step.
[44:14.400 --> 44:18.400]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.400 --> 44:22.400]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.400 --> 44:27.400]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.400 --> 44:33.400]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.400 --> 44:42.400]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.400 --> 44:51.400]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more.
[44:51.400 --> 44:55.400]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:55.400 --> 45:00.400]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.400 --> 45:09.400]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[45:09.400 --> 45:15.400]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[45:15.400 --> 45:19.400]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[45:19.400 --> 45:25.400]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers and journalists.
[45:25.400 --> 45:28.400]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[45:28.400 --> 45:33.400]  In addition, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[45:33.400 --> 45:40.400]  We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[45:40.400 --> 45:44.400]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept big coins as payment.
[45:44.400 --> 45:47.400]  Call us at 512-646-644-0.
[45:47.400 --> 45:52.400]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[45:52.400 --> 45:55.400]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10-6, Saturdays, 10-2.
[45:55.400 --> 46:21.400]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[46:21.400 --> 46:26.400]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:26.400 --> 46:31.400]  I want you to listen to something really quick and I'm going to have to play it into the microphone over my computer speakers
[46:31.400 --> 46:35.400]  because I haven't got it wired up right where I can play it through the sound card and you can hear it.
[46:35.400 --> 46:38.400]  I'll turn it up loud enough so hopefully you can hear it.
[46:38.400 --> 46:46.400]  But this is the that guy scene from the movie, the 2007 movie, Live Free or Die Hard.
[46:46.400 --> 46:52.400]  I want you to listen carefully to what these guys are saying and then I've got something to say at the end of it.
[47:16.400 --> 47:45.400]  Do you hear that? There's no one else to do it, so that's why I'm doing it.
[47:45.400 --> 47:49.400]  If there was somebody else to do it, I would let them do it.
[47:49.400 --> 47:52.400]  And that, ladies and gentlemen, pretty much sums up my entire life.
[47:52.400 --> 47:56.400]  It sums up the entire reason I'm here.
[47:56.400 --> 48:08.400]  It sums up the entire reason why I gave up a career, having money and a lot of other things to be here
[48:08.400 --> 48:14.400]  because there isn't anyone else to do this.
[48:14.400 --> 48:16.400]  I'm not doing it to be a hero.
[48:16.400 --> 48:18.400]  I'm not doing it to be famous.
[48:18.400 --> 48:21.400]  I'm not doing it to be somebody's guru.
[48:21.400 --> 48:34.400]  I'm doing it to help you protect yourself and in exchange and extension to protect myself as well.
[48:34.400 --> 48:47.400]  Because as the founding fathers made it so abundantly clear to all of us, the best protection of your own individual rights is to ensure that you're willing to protect the rights of others.
[48:47.400 --> 49:05.400]  When we fail in that endeavor, we fail each other, we fail ourselves, and we fail our posterity because we're not going to leave them anything worth fighting for.
[49:05.400 --> 49:20.400]  We're going to let it be stolen through fraud, deception, and ever-increasing governmental encroachment upon the areas of our lives that we never authorized them to enter into.
[49:20.400 --> 49:37.400]  And to do things to us that we would never in our wildest dreams have even considered giving them the power to do, but they have taken it for themselves regardless.
[49:37.400 --> 50:00.400]  There is nothing more clear about why the Second Amendment was put into the Constitution of the United States and every state constitution's version thereof than the state of our governmental agencies and this country and the individual states today can show us.
[50:00.400 --> 50:06.400]  It was put there to protect us from the very things we are having to live through right now.
[50:06.400 --> 50:12.400]  It was put there to give us the means to control this and prevent it from the very beginning.
[50:12.400 --> 50:27.400]  And we have failed in every respect to use it for its intended purpose and to do the things that we have every right to do to hold accountable those who have taken a power they were never meant to have.
[50:27.400 --> 50:33.400]  And we have also done absolutely nothing to change the way they use it.
[50:33.400 --> 50:36.400]  We're not acting in our own best interest.
[50:36.400 --> 50:40.400]  We're not being apathetic in our own best interest.
[50:40.400 --> 50:53.400]  We are helping to destroy everything that we hold dear because we are failing or refusing to do anything at all to stop it.
[50:53.400 --> 50:58.400]  And that is just the facts.
[50:58.400 --> 51:07.400]  Why? Who? When?
[51:07.400 --> 51:14.400]  There's lots of hows, but we're not doing any of them.
[51:14.400 --> 51:16.400]  So what's going to happen?
[51:16.400 --> 51:18.400]  We already know the answer to that.
[51:18.400 --> 51:27.400]  If you've seen other countries that get into this position right here, you know what the inevitable outcome is going to be.
[51:27.400 --> 51:34.400]  And we are doing nothing or more aptly, you are doing nothing.
[51:34.400 --> 51:43.400]  I'm here at least trying to do something by educating you on this and showing you how to use it and why you should be using it.
[51:43.400 --> 51:44.400]  But are you?
[51:44.400 --> 51:46.400]  Are you spreading it around?
[51:46.400 --> 51:54.400]  Are you making other people known, other people aware of and putting them in the know about this information?
[51:54.400 --> 51:59.400]  Are you doing it in a way that draws them in and makes them want to know more and understand it?
[51:59.400 --> 52:06.400]  Are you doing it in a way that pushes them off and seals up their mind that ever accepting it is being valid?
[52:06.400 --> 52:08.400]  Because there's all kinds of people out there.
[52:08.400 --> 52:15.400]  There are those who are always thinking about the people first and there are those who are always thinking about the government first.
[52:15.400 --> 52:20.400]  And unfortunately, those are the ones that currently have control of the government.
[52:20.400 --> 52:35.400]  And if you think anyone, anyone that is a part of that government is actually there to serve you instead of it, how much a pound is what you're smoking?
[52:35.400 --> 52:39.400]  Because I would like to know where to get some.
[52:39.400 --> 52:46.400]  Maybe I'd get something to show for this besides headaches and heartburn.
[52:46.400 --> 52:54.400]  Come on, folks, it's time to wake up and do something, not be an armchair quarterback and a distance keyboard player.
[52:54.400 --> 52:57.400]  It's time to do something.
[52:57.400 --> 53:01.400]  All right, now we have Larry in Arizona.
[53:01.400 --> 53:04.400]  Larry, what can we do for you?
[53:04.400 --> 53:05.400]  Good evening, Eddie.
[53:05.400 --> 53:06.400]  Good evening?
[53:06.400 --> 53:09.400]  Eddie, your first part of your show was great.
[53:09.400 --> 53:11.400]  You brought up a lot of good points.
[53:11.400 --> 53:18.400]  And when you got into taxes, I'm having a hard time in the tax area.
[53:18.400 --> 53:22.400]  Is property tax an excise tax?
[53:22.400 --> 53:26.400]  What is the definition of an excise tax?
[53:26.400 --> 53:28.400]  I'm not exactly sure. That's why I'm asking.
[53:28.400 --> 53:31.400]  When you look it up, you'll know.
[53:31.400 --> 53:33.400]  That's the point.
[53:33.400 --> 53:35.400]  Okay.
[53:35.400 --> 53:37.400]  But it's a direct tax.
[53:37.400 --> 53:40.400]  I mean, property tax is a direct tax, correct?
[53:40.400 --> 53:41.400]  What?
[53:41.400 --> 53:42.400]  It's a buy value tax.
[53:42.400 --> 53:46.400]  Therefore, it has to be a direct tax.
[53:46.400 --> 53:47.400]  Okay.
[53:47.400 --> 53:51.400]  And that's forbidden by the federal constitution?
[53:51.400 --> 53:52.400]  No.
[53:52.400 --> 53:53.400]  Correct.
[53:53.400 --> 53:58.400]  It's forbidden for Congress to levy a direct tax under the federal constitution.
[53:58.400 --> 54:01.400]  Where does it say anything about the state?
[54:01.400 --> 54:02.400]  Okay.
[54:02.400 --> 54:03.400]  Okay.
[54:03.400 --> 54:10.400]  In Texas, it specifically says the state cannot levy a buy value tax.
[54:10.400 --> 54:13.400]  Yet that's exactly what they have done.
[54:13.400 --> 54:15.400]  And no Texan's done anything about it.
[54:15.400 --> 54:20.400]  And the courts are upholding it as if it's valid when it's not.
[54:20.400 --> 54:28.400]  Now, the courts did hold that the way the state was doing property taxes was unconstitutional.
[54:28.400 --> 54:32.400]  Yet the state is still doing it exactly the same way.
[54:32.400 --> 54:38.400]  Why is that?
[54:38.400 --> 54:39.400]  Yeah.
[54:39.400 --> 54:41.400]  You tell me why is that?
[54:41.400 --> 54:43.400]  Because people let them get away with it.
[54:43.400 --> 54:44.400]  Exactly.
[54:44.400 --> 54:45.400]  Okay.
[54:45.400 --> 54:53.400]  And so the reason for my response to your question, the way it is, is specifically
[54:53.400 --> 54:59.400]  because this goes to the issue of people understanding what's happening.
[54:59.400 --> 55:08.400]  And most people will not ingrain that information within themselves and put it there for easy
[55:08.400 --> 55:15.400]  retrieval and use unless they are forced to learn it for themselves firsthand.
[55:15.400 --> 55:20.400]  It's kind of like to give them in a fish versus teach them in a fish ideal.
[55:20.400 --> 55:22.400]  You give them a piece of information.
[55:22.400 --> 55:23.400]  They use it.
[55:23.400 --> 55:24.400]  They lose it.
[55:24.400 --> 55:25.400]  And that's the end of it.
[55:25.400 --> 55:30.400]  You make them learn the information that sticks with them no matter where they go and whatever
[55:30.400 --> 55:31.400]  situation they're in.
[55:31.400 --> 55:35.400]  If it comes up as something useful and applicable, they will access it.
[55:35.400 --> 55:41.400]  They will use it and they will bring it out again.
[55:41.400 --> 55:42.400]  Okay.
[55:42.400 --> 55:43.400]  Okay.
[55:43.400 --> 55:49.400]  In our state statute, they're using the word be simple and be absolute.
[55:49.400 --> 55:50.400]  Okay.
[55:50.400 --> 55:54.400]  Which are defined legally as what?
[55:54.400 --> 55:55.400]  Okay.
[55:55.400 --> 56:04.400]  As far as Bouvier's law dictionary, it looks to me that fee and fee simple are the same.
[56:04.400 --> 56:05.400]  Yeah.
[56:05.400 --> 56:08.400]  Fee is the default for fee simple.
[56:08.400 --> 56:14.400]  Fee simple is a default ownership when you have absolute complete right to whatever you
[56:14.400 --> 56:15.400]  have.
[56:15.400 --> 56:16.400]  Okay.
[56:16.400 --> 56:21.400]  So you're saying there is a difference between fee and fee simple?
[56:21.400 --> 56:22.400]  No.
[56:22.400 --> 56:27.400]  I'm saying that fee is the short version default of fee simple.
[56:27.400 --> 56:28.400]  Okay.
[56:28.400 --> 56:31.400]  There's a difference between fee simple and fee absolute.
[56:31.400 --> 56:33.400]  Legally speaking, I'm pretty sure.
[56:33.400 --> 56:38.400]  Even though terminology wise, they would tend to mean exactly the same thing as far as the
[56:38.400 --> 56:40.400]  way they're being said.
[56:40.400 --> 56:45.400]  Because fee simple is absolute ownership.
[56:45.400 --> 56:46.400]  Okay.
[56:46.400 --> 56:51.400]  So what is fee absolute in relation to absolute ownership?
[56:51.400 --> 56:56.400]  If they're saying they're contradictory, then that means they have to have to have defined
[56:56.400 --> 56:57.400]  them differently.
[56:57.400 --> 57:03.400]  If they're saying they're different, then they have to have defined them differently.
[57:03.400 --> 57:04.400]  Okay.
[57:04.400 --> 57:09.400]  Otherwise, why have both of them?
[57:09.400 --> 57:10.400]  Fee simple would be fee simple.
[57:10.400 --> 57:14.400]  There would be no need for a fee absolute if they mean exactly the same thing, right?
[57:14.400 --> 57:15.400]  Well, yeah.
[57:15.400 --> 57:19.400]  That's why I'm getting confused reading these statutes.
[57:19.400 --> 57:25.400]  They're using them differently, but Bouvier defines them fairly the same.
[57:25.400 --> 57:28.400]  But the statutes are using them separately.
[57:28.400 --> 57:32.400]  Well, again, how do the statutes define them?
[57:32.400 --> 57:37.400]  I have not found a definition in our Title 42 of the statutes.
[57:37.400 --> 57:38.400]  Okay.
[57:38.400 --> 57:43.400]  First, if you look under the definition in Bouviers of allodium estates, this is what
[57:43.400 --> 57:45.400]  it says about fee simple.
[57:45.400 --> 57:52.400]  In this country, the title of land is essentially allodium, and every tenant is fee simple.
[57:52.400 --> 57:56.400]  In fee simple has an absolute and perfect title.
[57:56.400 --> 58:01.400]  Yet in technical language, his estate is called an estate in fee simple and the tenure free
[58:01.400 --> 58:05.400]  in common, uh, soakage or sausage.
[58:05.400 --> 58:10.400]  I don't say how to pronounce that particular word, but that's what that means.
[58:10.400 --> 58:18.400]  Now, let me see if I can find where it's defines fee simple.
[58:18.400 --> 58:27.400]  Uh, anyway, while we're taking the break, I'll look that up and I'll get back with you
[58:27.400 --> 58:28.400]  on the other side.
[58:28.400 --> 58:29.400]  Okay.
[58:29.400 --> 58:30.400]  Okay.
[58:30.400 --> 58:31.400]  All right, Larry.
[58:31.400 --> 58:32.400]  Hang on.
[58:32.400 --> 58:33.400]  All right, folks.
[58:33.400 --> 58:34.400]  We'll be right back after this break.
[58:34.400 --> 58:55.900]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.900 --> 58:58.680]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.680 --> 59:04.080]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.080 --> 59:07.320]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.320 --> 59:09.080]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.080 --> 59:15.020]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:15.020 --> 59:18.760]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.760 --> 59:23.720]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.720 --> 59:28.440]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.440 --> 59:33.600]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.600 --> 59:44.040]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.040 --> 01:00:14.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com, that's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:43.800]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:00:43.800 --> 01:00:59.920]  Today in history, the year 1870, the Roman Catholic holiday of Christmas is declared
[01:00:59.920 --> 01:01:02.720]  a federal holiday in the United States.
[01:01:02.720 --> 01:01:12.880]  In recent years, Rep. Michael Burgess, Republican from the 26th Texas Congressional District,
[01:01:12.880 --> 01:01:17.320]  centering in Denton County, defended the controversial conditions in which the facilities being used
[01:01:17.320 --> 01:01:22.360]  to house child immigrants are supposedly found in on MSNBC earlier this week.
[01:01:22.360 --> 01:01:27.000]  The lawmaker stated, quote, I've been to Casa Padre in Brownsville, Texas, and yes, it's
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:31.720]  a restored Walmart, and you know what, there's not a lock on the door.
[01:01:31.720 --> 01:01:34.800]  Any child is free to leave at any time, but they don't.
[01:01:34.800 --> 01:01:35.800]  You know why?
[01:01:35.800 --> 01:01:40.720]  Because they are well taken care of, and that they are, quote, free to leave at any time.
[01:01:40.720 --> 01:01:44.440]  Apparently children must leave the facility with a parent or guardian who has passed a
[01:01:44.440 --> 01:01:48.360]  background check if they wish to stay in the United States, but the child is free to leave
[01:01:48.360 --> 01:01:54.040]  by themselves if they return to where they came from.
[01:01:54.040 --> 01:01:58.120]  General Motors Company is planning on investing $20 million at its Arlington Assembly plant
[01:01:58.120 --> 01:02:02.240]  in order to fit it to build the next generation of GM's full-size SUVs.
[01:02:02.240 --> 01:02:06.880]  Gerald Johnson, GM Executive Vice President of Global Manufacturing, stated that, quote,
[01:02:06.880 --> 01:02:10.480]  we've been building trucks in Texas for more than 20 years, and our additional investment
[01:02:10.480 --> 01:02:15.120]  in Arlington Assembly is proof of our commitment and confidence in our Arlington team.
[01:02:15.120 --> 01:02:20.080]  The automaker built the Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban, the GMC Yukon and Yukon XL, and
[01:02:20.080 --> 01:02:27.760]  the Cadillac Escalade at the 250-acre Arlington plant.
[01:02:27.760 --> 01:02:31.280]  This is a report released by the insurance company Allstate, looked into collision claims
[01:02:31.280 --> 01:02:32.800]  across the U.S.
[01:02:32.800 --> 01:02:38.040]  Two Texas cities made the list of safest cities to drive in, with Laredo at number five and
[01:02:38.040 --> 01:02:39.680]  McAllen at number nine.
[01:02:39.680 --> 01:02:41.680]  So let's keep driving safe, Texas.
[01:02:41.680 --> 01:02:43.680]  The lowdown is currently looking for sponsors.
[01:02:43.680 --> 01:02:47.680]  If you have a project or a service-active advertiser, feel free to shoot me an e-mail
[01:02:47.680 --> 01:02:53.680]  at RickRodieatprotonmail.com, and that's RickRodieROHDEatprotonmail.com.
[01:02:53.680 --> 01:02:57.680]  This was the lowdown for June 26, 2019.
[01:02:57.680 --> 01:03:09.720]  Let's welcome Jack C100-viangrelaxin' and Bill Scal降man.
[01:03:09.720 --> 01:03:11.460]  Download the yellow and white
[01:03:11.460 --> 01:03:12.680]  The
[01:03:12.680 --> 01:03:13.680]  The
[01:03:13.680 --> 01:03:14.680]  The
[01:03:14.680 --> 01:03:15.680]  The
[01:03:15.680 --> 01:03:16.180] ข
[01:03:16.180 --> 01:03:20.180]  and the country boy can't survive.
[01:03:20.180 --> 01:03:27.180]  Country folks can't survive.
[01:03:27.180 --> 01:03:31.180]  Because you can't starve us out and you can't make us run,
[01:03:31.180 --> 01:03:36.180]  because wouldn't the old boys pray you don't shot guns?
[01:03:36.180 --> 01:03:40.180]  We say praise, we say ma'am, if you ain't into that,
[01:03:40.180 --> 01:03:43.180]  we don't give a damn.
[01:03:43.180 --> 01:03:47.180]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio,
[01:03:47.180 --> 01:03:51.180]  the call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:51.180 --> 01:03:55.180]  Right now we are talking to Larry in Arizona.
[01:03:55.180 --> 01:03:57.180]  Alright Larry, this is what I've got.
[01:03:57.180 --> 01:04:01.180]  I've looked at both Bouviers 1856 and 1839
[01:04:01.180 --> 01:04:05.180]  and Black's Law 6 edition from 1996.
[01:04:05.180 --> 01:04:10.180]  This is what I have found dealing with fee simple and fee absolute.
[01:04:10.180 --> 01:04:13.180]  Typical words, fee simple, standing alone,
[01:04:13.180 --> 01:04:15.180]  create an absolute estate and device,
[01:04:15.180 --> 01:04:18.180]  and such words followed by a condition or special limitation
[01:04:18.180 --> 01:04:21.180]  create a defeasible fee.
[01:04:21.180 --> 01:04:25.180]  In other words, you can set conditions and limitations
[01:04:25.180 --> 01:04:29.180]  on the property under fee simple.
[01:04:29.180 --> 01:04:36.180]  Under fee absolute, it is actually a fee simple absolute,
[01:04:36.180 --> 01:04:40.180]  not just a fee absolute, and this is how it's defined.
[01:04:40.180 --> 01:04:45.180]  An estate limited absolutely to a person and his or her
[01:04:45.180 --> 01:04:50.180]  heirs and assigns forever without limitation or condition.
[01:04:50.180 --> 01:04:53.180]  That is exactly how the lands of Texas are transferred
[01:04:53.180 --> 01:04:56.180]  to people via land patent.
[01:04:56.180 --> 01:05:00.180]  And if I'm not mistaken, according to what we've discussed before,
[01:05:00.180 --> 01:05:02.180]  that's the same language that appears in the land grants
[01:05:02.180 --> 01:05:05.180]  out in your neck of the woods.
[01:05:05.180 --> 01:05:08.180]  Yes, it absolutely is.
[01:05:08.180 --> 01:05:13.180]  Therefore, your property is a fee absolute.
[01:05:13.180 --> 01:05:17.180]  Now see if the state defines it that way.
[01:05:17.180 --> 01:05:20.180]  Okay, I'll have to start digging into that.
[01:05:20.180 --> 01:05:24.180]  Okay, now you also had mentioned the word estate,
[01:05:24.180 --> 01:05:27.180]  it seems like a dangerous word to me.
[01:05:27.180 --> 01:05:29.180]  Why?
[01:05:29.180 --> 01:05:32.180]  Estate simply means all the possessions and properties
[01:05:32.180 --> 01:05:35.180]  of an individual, that's all it means.
[01:05:35.180 --> 01:05:40.180]  Okay, but if I put the word estate with the word real,
[01:05:40.180 --> 01:05:42.180]  I start getting into trouble.
[01:05:42.180 --> 01:05:45.180]  No, you don't start getting into trouble.
[01:05:45.180 --> 01:05:49.180]  Again, when I refer to something as real estate.
[01:05:49.180 --> 01:05:52.180]  Real estate is specifically defined in law,
[01:05:52.180 --> 01:05:56.180]  just like all these other terms are.
[01:05:56.180 --> 01:06:01.180]  Okay, how does law define real estate?
[01:06:01.180 --> 01:06:10.180]  A land for time and time in a land.
[01:06:10.180 --> 01:06:14.180]  In one of the legal dictionaries I'm looking at.
[01:06:14.180 --> 01:06:18.180]  And I don't understand what that means.
[01:06:18.180 --> 01:06:22.180]  I'd have to see the actual words to see exactly how that's supposed
[01:06:22.180 --> 01:06:25.180]  to be a definition for something.
[01:06:25.180 --> 01:06:29.180]  Yeah, I don't understand it all, but...
[01:06:29.180 --> 01:06:32.180]  Let's see here.
[01:06:32.180 --> 01:06:34.180]  Okay, well you've given me enough to run with,
[01:06:34.180 --> 01:06:36.180]  and I'll let you get on to another caller.
[01:06:36.180 --> 01:06:38.180]  Okay, well hang on just a second.
[01:06:38.180 --> 01:06:41.180]  I'm trying to look up something here in relation to estate,
[01:06:41.180 --> 01:06:45.180]  if this thing would scroll at any speed reasonable.
[01:06:45.180 --> 01:06:49.180]  Okay, estate, the degree, quantity, nature,
[01:06:49.180 --> 01:06:52.180]  and extent of interest which a person has
[01:06:52.180 --> 01:06:55.180]  in real and personal property.
[01:06:55.180 --> 01:06:58.180]  An estate in lands, tenements, and hereditments
[01:06:58.180 --> 01:07:02.180]  signify such interest as the tenant has therein.
[01:07:02.180 --> 01:07:07.180]  Now here's the thing, in this definition it's calling one a tenant.
[01:07:07.180 --> 01:07:08.180]  Okay?
[01:07:08.180 --> 01:07:09.180]  Okay.
[01:07:09.180 --> 01:07:11.180]  So you're going to need to look and see how tenant is defined,
[01:07:11.180 --> 01:07:13.180]  because in every definition I've ever seen,
[01:07:13.180 --> 01:07:19.180]  tenant is someone who has legal control
[01:07:19.180 --> 01:07:24.180]  and ownership of a piece of property, but not...
[01:07:24.180 --> 01:07:26.180]  Not absolute ownership.
[01:07:26.180 --> 01:07:29.180]  Right.
[01:07:29.180 --> 01:07:34.180]  Okay, and so they're not a true owner.
[01:07:34.180 --> 01:07:41.180]  They can do anything except destroy or transfer the property
[01:07:41.180 --> 01:07:44.180]  when they're a tenant.
[01:07:44.180 --> 01:07:49.180]  Okay, that's the difference between the kinds of ownership.
[01:07:49.180 --> 01:07:52.180]  Yeah, they're basically a qualified owner.
[01:07:52.180 --> 01:07:54.180]  Yeah, up to a point.
[01:07:54.180 --> 01:07:55.180]  Yeah, okay.
[01:07:55.180 --> 01:07:57.180]  Okay.
[01:07:57.180 --> 01:07:58.180]  Yes.
[01:07:58.180 --> 01:08:01.180]  All right, but anyway, take that into consideration
[01:08:01.180 --> 01:08:04.180]  and go take a look at how they're trying to define it.
[01:08:04.180 --> 01:08:06.180]  Okay, I'll run with that.
[01:08:06.180 --> 01:08:07.180]  Well, I appreciate your time, Eddie.
[01:08:07.180 --> 01:08:08.180]  Yes, sir.
[01:08:08.180 --> 01:08:09.180]  Thanks for calling.
[01:08:09.180 --> 01:08:10.180]  Okay, thanks.
[01:08:10.180 --> 01:08:12.180]  Bye-bye.
[01:08:12.180 --> 01:08:16.180]  All right, now, let's see.
[01:08:16.180 --> 01:08:22.180]  Next caller up on the board here is Brett in Texas.
[01:08:22.180 --> 01:08:24.180]  Brett, what can we do for you?
[01:08:24.180 --> 01:08:26.180]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:08:26.180 --> 01:08:27.180]  Good evening.
[01:08:27.180 --> 01:08:29.180]  I need you to get a little closer to your phone.
[01:08:29.180 --> 01:08:32.180]  And if you're on a speakerphone, take me off the speaker
[01:08:32.180 --> 01:08:35.180]  and talk into it directly so I can hear you and everyone else can, too.
[01:08:35.180 --> 01:08:37.180]  Let me step over this way.
[01:08:37.180 --> 01:08:38.180]  Is that any better?
[01:08:38.180 --> 01:08:39.180]  That's a little better.
[01:08:39.180 --> 01:08:41.180]  All right.
[01:08:41.180 --> 01:08:43.180]  Thank you, Mike Paul.
[01:08:43.180 --> 01:08:49.180]  I wanted to check with you to pick your brain about how can we be more effective
[01:08:49.180 --> 01:08:56.180]  because it feels like we're just playing on our fists in the wind to some degree.
[01:08:56.180 --> 01:09:03.180]  I mean, I know that we're making some headway if there's even just a few of us.
[01:09:03.180 --> 01:09:07.180]  We're making some ripples, and I understand that.
[01:09:07.180 --> 01:09:15.180]  And I wonder if there's anything that can expedite the effectiveness,
[01:09:15.180 --> 01:09:23.180]  if we can be more effective to get these judges to wake up and start adjudicating
[01:09:23.180 --> 01:09:30.180]  according to the law instead of according to what their comfortable and their normal pattern.
[01:09:30.180 --> 01:09:35.180]  Is there any way that we can get more dismissals and get them to leave us alone more
[01:09:35.180 --> 01:09:37.180]  and start doing things right?
[01:09:37.180 --> 01:09:40.180]  Well, if we've got more intelligent people on the juries,
[01:09:40.180 --> 01:09:43.180]  if we've got more intelligent people fighting their cases,
[01:09:43.180 --> 01:09:49.180]  they actually bothered to learn the law and how to argue and how to make legal points
[01:09:49.180 --> 01:09:52.180]  and introduce legal evidence and make legal challenges.
[01:09:52.180 --> 01:09:57.180]  When the other side tries to do something that's not allowed to do, there's lots we could do.
[01:09:57.180 --> 01:10:02.180]  The problem is getting people willing and able to learn and do it.
[01:10:02.180 --> 01:10:07.180]  In all the years I've been doing this, I can count on one hand the number of people
[01:10:07.180 --> 01:10:14.180]  that I have successfully enabled to do this on their own.
[01:10:14.180 --> 01:10:18.180]  They took the ball, they not only learned everything they could about the ball,
[01:10:18.180 --> 01:10:23.180]  but how to carry it, how to run with it and how to score with it.
[01:10:23.180 --> 01:10:28.180]  Well, you've been instrumental in helping me about that and inspiring as well
[01:10:28.180 --> 01:10:31.180]  because I know that there was a way that could be successful.
[01:10:31.180 --> 01:10:41.180]  I've seen some limited success. I'm about half and half with getting dismissals
[01:10:41.180 --> 01:10:51.180]  and maybe half of them dismissals and then most of the rest, they just leave me alone.
[01:10:51.180 --> 01:10:57.180]  They just go dormant. They don't want to push it that last little bit, they just leave me alone.
[01:10:57.180 --> 01:11:02.180]  I've got a couple of them that they went ahead and collected or else jail.
[01:11:02.180 --> 01:11:11.180]  I think every bit of that that would have been successful wouldn't have happened if it were for you.
[01:11:11.180 --> 01:11:22.180]  You're the one that got me interested and encouraged that there is a possibility to see some good results out of all this.
[01:11:22.180 --> 01:11:33.180]  We know that it's everybody or at least about the taste of it.
[01:11:33.180 --> 01:11:42.180]  But most people don't seem to have any idea. I never did. I've talked to people with it.
[01:11:42.180 --> 01:11:45.180]  Wait, wait, wait. Don't have any idea of what now?
[01:11:45.180 --> 01:11:48.180]  How to deal with it.
[01:11:48.180 --> 01:11:54.180]  Well, that's the whole reason we do this show is to try to teach you how to deal with it.
[01:11:54.180 --> 01:11:57.180]  And that's what we try to do.
[01:11:57.180 --> 01:12:02.180]  The unfortunate thing is, is like everything else in the world, there are people that are going to be good at it
[01:12:02.180 --> 01:12:05.180]  and there are people that aren't going to be good at it.
[01:12:05.180 --> 01:12:13.180]  Unfortunately, this is one of those kinds of things that the majority are not going to be good at it.
[01:12:13.180 --> 01:12:25.180]  Why? Because not meaning to be insulting to anyone or anybody, but they don't have the proper mindset and rational ability that law requires
[01:12:25.180 --> 01:12:34.180]  to take it into consideration and make an argument out of what's there and what's not there in a way that makes sense.
[01:12:34.180 --> 01:12:46.180]  In a lot of ways, law is not as fixed as people would like to think it is because the law has to be written general enough to serve its intended purpose in a majority of circumstances,
[01:12:46.180 --> 01:12:57.180]  but not so strict as to make its ability to be used severely limited so as to not apply it where it should be applied.
[01:12:57.180 --> 01:13:01.180]  And therein is where the problem arises.
[01:13:01.180 --> 01:13:13.180]  When you give a law a liberal construction in its application without consideration of everything the legislature had on their mind and on their tongue
[01:13:13.180 --> 01:13:25.180]  when they wrote it and put it out there to be enacted as a law, then you're not playing the game with all the information necessary to play it correctly.
[01:13:25.180 --> 01:13:28.180]  It's basically like how most people play board games.
[01:13:28.180 --> 01:13:36.180]  They don't ever read the rules. They read just enough to get the general idea and then they make it up as they go along.
[01:13:36.180 --> 01:13:43.180]  Well, no less true is that of the legal profession.
[01:13:43.180 --> 01:13:46.180]  And therein lies the problem.
[01:13:46.180 --> 01:13:54.180]  It is very difficult to make a valid argument without the entire picture.
[01:13:54.180 --> 01:14:06.180]  That's why the courts, when they try to shoot down an argument that does have substance to it, they go to so many different resources within the law to try to find the laws
[01:14:06.180 --> 01:14:13.180]  and the backing they need to make the argument either for or against the reasoning made in that argument.
[01:14:13.180 --> 01:14:17.180]  It all depends on how they want to rule against it or for it.
[01:14:17.180 --> 01:14:22.180]  And that is the biggest problem right now we have with law to begin with.
[01:14:22.180 --> 01:14:28.180]  A judge enters an opinion based upon an outcome they want.
[01:14:28.180 --> 01:14:31.180]  I want to rule against this guy.
[01:14:31.180 --> 01:14:36.180]  Find me all the legal authorities, and this is what he's saying to his law clerks, especially in the Supreme Court.
[01:14:36.180 --> 01:14:42.180]  Find me all the legal authority that makes the argument that we can shoot this guy's argument down with.
[01:14:42.180 --> 01:14:45.180]  And that's how they enter into a case.
[01:14:45.180 --> 01:14:48.180]  They're not looking to be fair and impartial.
[01:14:48.180 --> 01:14:55.180]  They're not looking at the argument, they're looking for ways to either support it or deny it.
[01:14:55.180 --> 01:15:02.180]  Whichever one they decided beforehand, they wanted to do.
[01:15:02.180 --> 01:15:10.180]  And that's a problem.
[01:15:10.180 --> 01:15:14.180]  Oh, I lost the caller I guess. He's no longer on the board.
[01:15:14.180 --> 01:15:18.180]  Oh, hang on a second. Brad, are you there?
[01:15:18.180 --> 01:15:19.180]  I am.
[01:15:19.180 --> 01:15:22.180]  Oh, okay. Somehow or other you disappeared.
[01:15:22.180 --> 01:15:24.180]  And now you're back. Okay, sorry.
[01:15:24.180 --> 01:15:26.180]  Did you catch all that?
[01:15:26.180 --> 01:15:28.180]  Yes, and I totally agree.
[01:15:28.180 --> 01:15:39.180]  I'm also looking for ways that I can be effective without it being dependent on the whole general populace, getting smarter and wiser and braver.
[01:15:39.180 --> 01:15:44.180]  Which is, I know they need to, but I don't want that outcome of them.
[01:15:44.180 --> 01:15:50.180]  Well, the best way to do that is to be a better lawyer than the lawyer.
[01:15:50.180 --> 01:15:53.180]  To be a better lawyer than the judge.
[01:15:53.180 --> 01:15:58.180]  That's how you're going to do that for yourself, regardless of what anyone else does.
[01:15:58.180 --> 01:16:04.180]  This is the whole reason why making a record for appeal is so important.
[01:16:04.180 --> 01:16:11.180]  An ignorant jury is going to convict you because they're going to convict you based upon what they believe, not what they know.
[01:16:11.180 --> 01:16:14.180]  Right, and they're impressed by the lawyer's suit and everything else.
[01:16:14.180 --> 01:16:25.180]  Yeah, well, there's a reason why the lawyers say that a trial is nothing more than a play put on for the jury to determine who had the better lawyer.
[01:16:25.180 --> 01:16:38.180]  That's probably true, that's sad.
[01:16:38.180 --> 01:16:46.180]  Okay, and unfortunately, that is exactly how the jury sees a case to the eyes of the better lawyer.
[01:16:46.180 --> 01:16:49.180]  Wow.
[01:16:49.180 --> 01:16:56.180]  Okay, hang on just a second, we'll finish this little conversation on the other side, so hold on, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:16:56.180 --> 01:17:00.180]  Y'all hang on folks, we shall return.
[01:17:00.180 --> 01:17:05.180]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.180 --> 01:17:09.180]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method.
[01:17:09.180 --> 01:17:14.180]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.180 --> 01:17:20.180]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute,
[01:17:20.180 --> 01:17:26.180]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:17:26.180 --> 01:17:33.180]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.180 --> 01:17:38.180]  The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.180 --> 01:17:40.180]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.180 --> 01:17:46.180]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner,
[01:17:46.180 --> 01:17:49.180]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.180 --> 01:17:57.180]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.180 --> 01:18:00.180]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.180 --> 01:18:01.180]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.180 --> 01:18:04.180]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.180 --> 01:18:07.180]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.180 --> 01:18:10.180]  I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without logos.
[01:18:10.180 --> 01:18:13.180]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.180 --> 01:18:16.180]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite,
[01:18:16.180 --> 01:18:20.180]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.180 --> 01:18:22.180]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.180 --> 01:18:24.180]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.180 --> 01:18:27.180]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:27.180 --> 01:18:29.180]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.180 --> 01:18:31.180]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.180 --> 01:18:34.180]  Now, go to www.logosreguledetwork.com.
[01:18:34.180 --> 01:18:37.180]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.180 --> 01:18:43.180]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.180 --> 01:18:44.180]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.180 --> 01:18:45.180]  No.
[01:18:45.180 --> 01:18:47.180]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.180 --> 01:18:48.180]  No.
[01:18:48.180 --> 01:18:49.180]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.180 --> 01:18:50.180]  No.
[01:18:50.180 --> 01:18:51.180]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.180 --> 01:18:54.180]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.180 --> 01:18:55.180]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.180 --> 01:18:57.180]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.180 --> 01:18:58.180]  You're welcome.
[01:18:58.180 --> 01:19:00.180]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:19:00.180 --> 01:19:07.180]  This is the Logos, Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.180 --> 01:19:32.180]  All right, folks.
[01:19:32.180 --> 01:19:33.180]  We are back.
[01:19:33.180 --> 01:19:36.180]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:19:36.180 --> 01:19:39.180]  And we are talking with Brett in Texas.
[01:19:39.180 --> 01:19:40.180]  All right, Brett.
[01:19:40.180 --> 01:19:44.180]  Let's see if we can wrap this up here and get on with somebody else.
[01:19:44.180 --> 01:19:45.180]  Sure.
[01:19:45.180 --> 01:19:49.180]  I was kind of hoping you might have some ideas for me.
[01:19:49.180 --> 01:19:54.180]  Well, unfortunately, every idea I've got all comes down to the same thing.
[01:19:54.180 --> 01:19:56.180]  And it's always the same thing.
[01:19:56.180 --> 01:20:00.180]  The best thing you can do to help everyone else is to help yourself.
[01:20:00.180 --> 01:20:10.180]  The best way to help yourself, read, learn, study, discuss, find anything and everything
[01:20:10.180 --> 01:20:17.180]  you can get your hands on about how to do good legal writing, about how courts determine
[01:20:17.180 --> 01:20:24.180]  their opinions, about how the law can be read and understood, and so on and so forth.
[01:20:24.180 --> 01:20:30.180]  The more you expand your knowledge and abilities in those areas, the more capable you will become.
[01:20:30.180 --> 01:20:37.180]  The more capable you are, the less likely the other side is going to want to deal with you.
[01:20:37.180 --> 01:20:43.180]  The less they want to deal with you, the more likely they're going to either throw out or bury your case.
[01:20:43.180 --> 01:20:55.180]  And then you know you've got a successful formula that you can then use to help others do exactly the same thing.
[01:20:55.180 --> 01:20:57.180]  There is no other shortcut.
[01:20:57.180 --> 01:21:02.180]  There is no other road short of another civil war.
[01:21:02.180 --> 01:21:12.180]  And that's the one place I really don't want to see us going even if I am almost dead certain it's the only resort we're going to be allowed to take.
[01:21:12.180 --> 01:21:16.180]  To get any real remedy anyway.
[01:21:16.180 --> 01:21:21.180]  When you put it to that contrast, I guess it doesn't seem so bad.
[01:21:21.180 --> 01:21:29.180]  I've been spending a lot of my hours from family time just on self-defense that shouldn't even happen to happen.
[01:21:29.180 --> 01:21:35.180]  Well, I agree, but that's why I live alone in Austin hundreds of miles from my family.
[01:21:35.180 --> 01:21:43.180]  Because I don't want anything to affect them just because of what I feel I have to do to make a change in things.
[01:21:43.180 --> 01:21:46.180]  I hear you.
[01:21:46.180 --> 01:21:48.180]  Alright, well thanks.
[01:21:48.180 --> 01:21:50.180]  God bless you Eddie.
[01:21:50.180 --> 01:21:53.180]  Well thank you and you have a great night and thanks for calling.
[01:21:53.180 --> 01:21:55.180]  Good night.
[01:21:55.180 --> 01:21:58.180]  Alright, now we have Greg in Tennessee.
[01:21:58.180 --> 01:22:01.180]  Greg in Tennessee, what can we do for you?
[01:22:01.180 --> 01:22:07.180]  Well, I don't know if you remember my case.
[01:22:07.180 --> 01:22:11.180]  I don't know, but can I get you to talk a little closer into your phone there?
[01:22:11.180 --> 01:22:13.180]  Okay, is that better?
[01:22:13.180 --> 01:22:15.180]  Much.
[01:22:15.180 --> 01:22:20.180]  Okay, it's a new phone, I really don't even know how it works very much yet.
[01:22:20.180 --> 01:22:32.180]  But no, I talked to you before, it's been a while, maybe a couple months ago, about the, I got constable.
[01:22:32.180 --> 01:22:41.180]  We wanted to go in front of the grand jury and testify about him in East Tennessee here.
[01:22:41.180 --> 01:22:46.180]  Wait a minute, you wanted to go in front of a grand jury and testify about him?
[01:22:46.180 --> 01:22:47.180]  Yeah.
[01:22:47.180 --> 01:22:48.180]  Okay.
[01:22:48.180 --> 01:22:50.180]  He charges against him or whatever, yeah.
[01:22:50.180 --> 01:22:52.180]  Okay, four?
[01:22:52.180 --> 01:23:03.180]  But what you told me to do was to send certified mail to grand jurors one through eleven and performing.
[01:23:03.180 --> 01:23:04.180]  Right.
[01:23:04.180 --> 01:23:11.180]  And well, it was pretty difficult, but I did get in front of them, but they know building in about fifteen minutes.
[01:23:11.180 --> 01:23:13.180]  Well, that doesn't mean you have to stop there.
[01:23:13.180 --> 01:23:18.180]  You can send it to any grand jury in your state and you can send it to all the grand juries in your state.
[01:23:18.180 --> 01:23:23.180]  And you can send it to any new grand jury that's formed in that same county if you want.
[01:23:23.180 --> 01:23:30.180]  Until the statute of limitations on the criminal acts is passed, you can keep filing with a grand jury until the cows come home.
[01:23:30.180 --> 01:23:33.180]  And you are not limited to the one that's strictly in your area.
[01:23:33.180 --> 01:23:36.180]  You can file with any grand jury in your state.
[01:23:36.180 --> 01:23:47.180]  I guarantee you the state constitution does not place any limitation whatsoever on what area a grand jury may indict in.
[01:23:47.180 --> 01:23:48.180]  Yeah.
[01:23:48.180 --> 01:23:49.180]  Well, that's the thing.
[01:23:49.180 --> 01:23:55.180]  The statute of limitations is running out on two of the charges here in about a week.
[01:23:55.180 --> 01:24:08.180]  But I would spend all this time trying to file charges against the system, B.A., in front of the same grand jury, tried to, and a clerk.
[01:24:08.180 --> 01:24:12.180]  But they know building everybody in about no time.
[01:24:12.180 --> 01:24:16.180]  Well, there's no guarantee a grand jury will indict them.
[01:24:16.180 --> 01:24:21.180]  But that doesn't mean you shouldn't be trying.
[01:24:21.180 --> 01:24:22.180]  Yeah.
[01:24:22.180 --> 01:24:25.180]  But after the statute of limitations runs out.
[01:24:25.180 --> 01:24:33.180]  Well, now, are you talking about the statute of limitations for the crime itself that you're accusing them of, or for your ability to sue them?
[01:24:33.180 --> 01:24:37.180]  You said that until the statute of limitations runs out.
[01:24:37.180 --> 01:24:40.180]  Well, again, there's more than one that we're talking about here.
[01:24:40.180 --> 01:24:51.180]  Are we talking about the one for the criminal acts themselves that you are accusing them of committing, or are we talking about the statute of limitations that you have on your ability to sue?
[01:24:51.180 --> 01:24:58.180]  I thought that the criminal was the same as the statute of limitations as the civil.
[01:24:58.180 --> 01:24:59.180]  No.
[01:24:59.180 --> 01:25:00.180]  Is it not?
[01:25:00.180 --> 01:25:01.180]  Oh.
[01:25:01.180 --> 01:25:07.180]  For instance, on felonies, most felonies have a minimum five-year statute of limitations.
[01:25:07.180 --> 01:25:08.180]  Minimum.
[01:25:08.180 --> 01:25:09.180]  Well, I do.
[01:25:09.180 --> 01:25:10.180]  And some are more.
[01:25:10.180 --> 01:25:11.180]  Okay.
[01:25:11.180 --> 01:25:22.180]  Like murder, for instance, has and fraud have no statutes of limitations whatsoever, but your ability to sue is limited to two years.
[01:25:22.180 --> 01:25:23.180]  All right.
[01:25:23.180 --> 01:25:26.180]  Well, these are sort of low-grade felonies.
[01:25:26.180 --> 01:25:33.180]  I guess the prosecutors, I mean, the assistant district attorney, it's a think-classy.
[01:25:33.180 --> 01:25:41.180]  And then the aggravated stalking is one of the three charges against the constable, and it's a class-y.
[01:25:41.180 --> 01:25:47.180]  So I think the statute of limitations is two years on felonies, those types.
[01:25:47.180 --> 01:25:49.180]  So I'm not positive, but I think so.
[01:25:49.180 --> 01:25:59.180]  But anyway, it gives me another year on that that I could tell them trouble.
[01:25:59.180 --> 01:26:00.180]  Okay.
[01:26:00.180 --> 01:26:01.180]  Well, hang in there.
[01:26:01.180 --> 01:26:03.180]  Keep sending them out to other grand juries.
[01:26:03.180 --> 01:26:05.180]  Don't limit yourself to just the one.
[01:26:05.180 --> 01:26:12.180]  The problem is, is you don't know if anybody on the grand jury knows the people you're trying to accuse, and it's favorable to them because of it.
[01:26:12.180 --> 01:26:17.180]  So go outside of where you're at and give it to others who don't know them.
[01:26:17.180 --> 01:26:18.180]  Right.
[01:26:18.180 --> 01:26:25.180]  Well, I was sort of headed or thinking that I would go to the fed at some point.
[01:26:25.180 --> 01:26:39.180]  Well, you could send, I didn't say not to send them to the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney. You can do that just as well if you could show that they're federal violations.
[01:26:39.180 --> 01:26:47.180]  But it won't do you any good unless you can show that they either violated a federally protected right or a federal law.
[01:26:47.180 --> 01:26:50.180]  That's the only thing about taking it to the feds.
[01:26:50.180 --> 01:26:53.180]  So I need to start reading the federal code then.
[01:26:53.180 --> 01:27:05.180]  Well, you need to find out whether or not the criminal, the acts they committed at the state level have a relation to a federal law under the same thing, under Title 18.
[01:27:05.180 --> 01:27:17.180]  Title 18 of the U.S. Code is where you will find the criminal acts that Congress has made applicable to state actors.
[01:27:17.180 --> 01:27:18.180]  Okay.
[01:27:18.180 --> 01:27:25.180]  So the state law I was charging the district attorney with was the official oppression and official misconduct.
[01:27:25.180 --> 01:27:31.180]  Well, there is a related law to that at the federal level under Title 18. Go find it.
[01:27:31.180 --> 01:27:33.180]  Okay.
[01:27:33.180 --> 01:27:35.180]  So if I wanted to, and then I figured the next...
[01:27:35.180 --> 01:27:42.180]  I think it's Title 18-242, I think, but...
[01:27:42.180 --> 01:27:44.180]  Yeah, I think that's right.
[01:27:44.180 --> 01:27:49.180]  It's a quick-close plan act, part of it, right?
[01:27:49.180 --> 01:27:52.180]  Something like that, yeah.
[01:27:52.180 --> 01:27:54.180]  That's what Randy calls it.
[01:27:54.180 --> 01:28:02.180]  It's got a civil side that's similar, anyway.
[01:28:02.180 --> 01:28:06.180]  So you think I should just go to...
[01:28:06.180 --> 01:28:10.180]  You said the United States attorney?
[01:28:10.180 --> 01:28:18.180]  The U.S. attorney and the Department of Justice is also places you can go to and file complaints against state actors, yes.
[01:28:18.180 --> 01:28:22.180]  Okay, well, just skip the special agent in charge.
[01:28:22.180 --> 01:28:25.180]  Well, they're not going to give you the special agent in charge.
[01:28:25.180 --> 01:28:33.180]  Just tell them that you wish to file a complaint against a state actor and they're going to give you an online resource to go fill out the information on and submit it.
[01:28:33.180 --> 01:28:47.180]  It's very unlikely, unless there's some real damning evidence and crimes involved, that you're going to get a personal audience with anybody by them either coming to your location or you being invited to theirs.
[01:28:47.180 --> 01:28:48.180]  Oh, yeah.
[01:28:48.180 --> 01:28:54.180]  Because it's not like this crap doesn't happen 1,500 times every single day across the country.
[01:28:54.180 --> 01:28:56.180]  I'm sure that's right.
[01:28:56.180 --> 01:29:01.180]  But it goes unrecognized and then noticed half the time or more.
[01:29:01.180 --> 01:29:05.180]  Well, it's swept under the rug as far as media coverage is concerned.
[01:29:05.180 --> 01:29:13.180]  It may not be left alone and buried, but it may not be brought into the public eye like it should be either.
[01:29:13.180 --> 01:29:16.180]  So you don't ever know for sure one way or the other.
[01:29:16.180 --> 01:29:21.180]  Just report it and keep pressing on it.
[01:29:21.180 --> 01:29:22.180]  Okay.
[01:29:22.180 --> 01:29:32.180]  But like anything else when it comes to this, keep your eye out for backlash because it tends to happen if you press the wrong buttons on the wrong people.
[01:29:32.180 --> 01:29:33.180]  Oh, I know.
[01:29:33.180 --> 01:29:36.180]  I've been on the end of the backlash for a good while.
[01:29:36.180 --> 01:29:37.180]  Okay.
[01:29:37.180 --> 01:29:40.180]  I got a lot of backlash stories I can tell you.
[01:29:40.180 --> 01:29:43.180]  Yeah.
[01:29:43.180 --> 01:29:44.180]  All right.
[01:29:44.180 --> 01:29:45.180]  Well, hang on.
[01:29:45.180 --> 01:29:47.180]  I got a break to take and we'll wrap this up on the other side.
[01:29:47.180 --> 01:29:48.180]  Okay.
[01:29:48.180 --> 01:29:49.180]  Okay.
[01:29:49.180 --> 01:29:50.180]  Thank you.
[01:29:50.180 --> 01:29:51.180]  Yep.
[01:29:51.180 --> 01:29:52.180]  Hello.
[01:29:52.180 --> 01:29:54.180]  We are coming up on a half hour up in the show.
[01:29:54.180 --> 01:30:03.180]  So y'all hang in there 512-646-1984 if you want to call in.
[01:30:03.180 --> 01:30:05.180]  Does stress make your hair turn gray?
[01:30:05.180 --> 01:30:08.180]  For years, silver foxes have been claiming as much.
[01:30:08.180 --> 01:30:11.180]  But scientists now say they can explain why.
[01:30:11.180 --> 01:30:17.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albright and I'll be right back to tell you how stress ages us prematurely.
[01:30:17.180 --> 01:30:19.180]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:19.180 --> 01:30:23.180]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:23.180 --> 01:30:27.180]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.180 --> 01:30:29.180]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:29.180 --> 01:30:33.180]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:33.180 --> 01:30:35.180]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.180 --> 01:30:39.180]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:39.180 --> 01:30:43.180]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:43.180 --> 01:30:46.180]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.180 --> 01:30:48.180]  When the going gets tough, the hair is turned gray.
[01:30:48.180 --> 01:30:53.180]  It may sound like folklore, but scientists say chronic stress really does make us look older
[01:30:53.180 --> 01:30:55.180]  and heightens the risk of disease.
[01:30:55.180 --> 01:31:01.180]  During a four-week experiment, Duke University researchers injected mice with an adrenaline-like compound
[01:31:01.180 --> 01:31:03.180]  that mimics stress in human beings.
[01:31:03.180 --> 01:31:10.180]  They found a sharp reduction in P53, a protein that keeps cells healthy and prevents cancer.
[01:31:10.180 --> 01:31:15.180]  When the mice's level of P53 stayed low, their chromosomes began to develop irregularities
[01:31:15.180 --> 01:31:19.180]  that sped up the aging process and increased their risk of cancer.
[01:31:19.180 --> 01:31:21.180]  So don't skip that vacation.
[01:31:21.180 --> 01:31:23.180]  It may do more than just calm your mind.
[01:31:23.180 --> 01:31:25.180]  It could help keep you young.
[01:31:25.180 --> 01:31:26.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:26.180 --> 01:31:30.180]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.180 --> 01:31:32.180]  I lost my son.
[01:31:32.180 --> 01:31:33.180]  My uncle.
[01:31:33.180 --> 01:31:34.180]  My uncle.
[01:31:34.180 --> 01:31:35.180]  My son.
[01:31:35.180 --> 01:31:36.180]  On September 11, 2000.
[01:31:36.180 --> 01:31:39.180]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.180 --> 01:31:43.180]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.180 --> 01:31:47.180]  Although the official exclamation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[01:31:47.180 --> 01:31:51.180]  over 1,200 architects and engineers has looked into the evidence
[01:31:51.180 --> 01:31:53.180]  and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.180 --> 01:31:54.180]  Bring justice to my son.
[01:31:54.180 --> 01:31:55.180]  My uncle.
[01:31:55.180 --> 01:31:56.180]  My nephew.
[01:31:56.180 --> 01:31:57.180]  My son.
[01:31:57.180 --> 01:31:58.180]  Go to BuildingWhat.org.
[01:31:58.180 --> 01:32:01.180]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.180 --> 01:32:05.180]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.180 --> 01:32:08.180]  In today's America, we live in a us-against-them society.
[01:32:08.180 --> 01:32:10.180]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.180 --> 01:32:13.180]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.180 --> 01:32:16.180]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:16.180 --> 01:32:18.180]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:18.180 --> 01:32:20.180]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.180 --> 01:32:23.180]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:23.180 --> 01:32:26.180]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.180 --> 01:32:29.180]  Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.180 --> 01:32:32.180]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:32.180 --> 01:32:34.180]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.180 --> 01:32:36.180]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.180 --> 01:32:38.180]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:38.180 --> 01:32:41.180]  by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.180 --> 01:32:43.180]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:43.180 --> 01:32:46.180]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[01:32:46.180 --> 01:32:48.180]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:48.180 --> 01:32:51.180]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.180 --> 01:32:53.180]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[01:32:53.180 --> 01:32:55.180]  from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[01:32:55.180 --> 01:32:58.180]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society
[01:32:58.180 --> 01:33:00.180]  we all want and deserve.
[01:33:00.180 --> 01:33:05.180]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[01:33:05.180 --> 01:33:31.180]  at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:35.180 --> 01:33:46.180]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:46.180 --> 01:33:48.180]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:48.180 --> 01:33:51.180]  We are now in the next to last segment of the show,
[01:33:51.180 --> 01:33:54.180]  and we are talking to Greg in Tennessee.
[01:33:54.180 --> 01:33:57.180]  All right, Greg, let's continue this up.
[01:33:57.180 --> 01:33:59.180]  Okay.
[01:33:59.180 --> 01:34:02.180]  You actually told me the same thing that Randy told me the other day
[01:34:02.180 --> 01:34:06.180]  about the grand jury, and then I could go as many of those as I wanted to.
[01:34:06.180 --> 01:34:09.180]  So, I mean, you kind of both recommend the same thing.
[01:34:09.180 --> 01:34:12.180]  So, the two scenarios that we talked about,
[01:34:12.180 --> 01:34:14.180]  which one do you think would be the most effective
[01:34:14.180 --> 01:34:17.180]  and which one since you made your comment?
[01:34:17.180 --> 01:34:21.180]  Why do you have to draw a distinction between which one is most effective?
[01:34:21.180 --> 01:34:26.180]  In this case, I would say the shotgun approach is your best approach.
[01:34:26.180 --> 01:34:31.180]  There's a reason people don't quell hunting with 22s.
[01:34:31.180 --> 01:34:34.180]  So, you're saying go to the fair.
[01:34:34.180 --> 01:34:37.180]  I'm saying go to everybody.
[01:34:37.180 --> 01:34:38.180]  Do them all.
[01:34:38.180 --> 01:34:42.180]  Use the shotgun approach.
[01:34:42.180 --> 01:34:43.180]  Okay, I got you.
[01:34:43.180 --> 01:34:45.180]  You ain't big quell hunting, have you?
[01:34:45.180 --> 01:34:49.180]  Well, I have, well, actually, not much.
[01:34:49.180 --> 01:34:53.180]  But the thing is, it takes time to do all that.
[01:34:53.180 --> 01:34:55.180]  Well, granted.
[01:34:55.180 --> 01:35:02.180]  Nowhere in this entire conversation have I said, and it takes you no time at all and no work possible to get it all done.
[01:35:02.180 --> 01:35:04.180]  Now, how about?
[01:35:04.180 --> 01:35:05.180]  What do you have?
[01:35:05.180 --> 01:35:07.180]  I just wanted to do the most effective one.
[01:35:07.180 --> 01:35:11.180]  Well, you're not going to know which one is the most effective one
[01:35:11.180 --> 01:35:16.180]  since either of them can wind up doing the same thing and having the same effect.
[01:35:16.180 --> 01:35:20.180]  I would say you can't tell from this end of the gun which one's the most effective.
[01:35:20.180 --> 01:35:24.180]  You're going to have to be on the receiving end to know.
[01:35:24.180 --> 01:35:28.180]  Right, and it might be different for each situation, so I understand.
[01:35:28.180 --> 01:35:33.180]  No, but yeah, I guess I'll just...
[01:35:33.180 --> 01:35:37.180]  If you're looking for validation of one process over the other, I can't give you that
[01:35:37.180 --> 01:35:43.180]  because it really depends on who chooses to act and for what purpose.
[01:35:43.180 --> 01:35:45.180]  Right.
[01:35:45.180 --> 01:35:47.180]  We're talking about the repercussions.
[01:35:47.180 --> 01:35:51.180]  Do you think it'd be more dangerous to try to go to the feds?
[01:35:51.180 --> 01:35:54.180]  If you think the feds are going to investigate without providing the local
[01:35:54.180 --> 01:35:57.180]  with the information as to who and why, think again.
[01:35:57.180 --> 01:35:58.180]  I don't know.
[01:35:58.180 --> 01:36:03.180]  But, you know, at the same time, the very fact that the feds brought up your name
[01:36:03.180 --> 01:36:07.180]  lets the locals know that they know about you, and if anything happens to you,
[01:36:07.180 --> 01:36:11.180]  then that's something that they might need to want to look a little closer at, right?
[01:36:11.180 --> 01:36:12.180]  Right, right.
[01:36:12.180 --> 01:36:17.180]  So I can't tell you whether it would protect you or hurt you until somebody does something.
[01:36:17.180 --> 01:36:19.180]  I understand.
[01:36:19.180 --> 01:36:23.180]  It's not a given if you don't either want to...
[01:36:23.180 --> 01:36:25.180]  It's an option.
[01:36:25.180 --> 01:36:27.180]  And it's a viable option.
[01:36:27.180 --> 01:36:30.180]  You just have to be willing to follow through with whatever it takes
[01:36:30.180 --> 01:36:33.180]  and to be careful about what could come because of it.
[01:36:33.180 --> 01:36:35.180]  And that's true in other situations.
[01:36:35.180 --> 01:36:38.180]  If you think those same kind of repercussions won't come
[01:36:38.180 --> 01:36:44.180]  from you filing something with every dad-blame grand jury in the place, think again.
[01:36:44.180 --> 01:36:49.180]  You know, I know that procedure, so that would take less time.
[01:36:49.180 --> 01:36:52.180]  Maybe I will use the shotgun approach and then to another grand jury
[01:36:52.180 --> 01:36:57.180]  and then study up on if I can find the law to make that thing happen.
[01:36:57.180 --> 01:36:58.180]  All right.
[01:36:58.180 --> 01:37:00.180]  Well, I sure appreciate your help.
[01:37:00.180 --> 01:37:02.180]  I'll let you go to other callers.
[01:37:02.180 --> 01:37:03.180]  All right.
[01:37:03.180 --> 01:37:05.180]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[01:37:05.180 --> 01:37:06.180]  Okay.
[01:37:06.180 --> 01:37:07.180]  You have good mama.
[01:37:07.180 --> 01:37:08.180]  You too.
[01:37:08.180 --> 01:37:09.180]  All right.
[01:37:09.180 --> 01:37:13.180]  Now, we go from there to John in New York.
[01:37:13.180 --> 01:37:15.180]  John, what do you have?
[01:37:15.180 --> 01:37:16.180]  Hi, John.
[01:37:16.180 --> 01:37:17.180]  Hi, John.
[01:37:17.180 --> 01:37:18.180]  How are you doing?
[01:37:18.180 --> 01:37:19.180]  Hi, John.
[01:37:19.180 --> 01:37:20.180]  How are you doing?
[01:37:20.180 --> 01:37:23.180]  I'm doing fine.
[01:37:23.180 --> 01:37:24.180]  Okay.
[01:37:24.180 --> 01:37:27.180]  71 miles in a 55-mile zone.
[01:37:27.180 --> 01:37:30.180]  There was no accident, no damage, no injuries.
[01:37:30.180 --> 01:37:34.180]  What have you found is the most effective way to beat this type of traffic
[01:37:34.180 --> 01:37:37.180]  ticket, 71 and a 55?
[01:37:37.180 --> 01:37:38.180]  Speedy.
[01:37:38.180 --> 01:37:42.180]  What kind of speed limits does the state law have?
[01:37:42.180 --> 01:37:47.180]  Well, according to them, when it's posted and it's posted at 55,
[01:37:47.180 --> 01:37:48.180]  that's what it's supposed to be.
[01:37:48.180 --> 01:37:49.180]  Okay.
[01:37:49.180 --> 01:37:51.180]  We've had this conversation before.
[01:37:51.180 --> 01:37:55.180]  Who is them and why in the hell are you listening to them?
[01:37:55.180 --> 01:38:00.180]  Why are you not reading the actual law dealing with speed limits
[01:38:00.180 --> 01:38:06.180]  and speeding offenses rather than listening to them?
[01:38:06.180 --> 01:38:08.180]  Oh, okay.
[01:38:08.180 --> 01:38:09.180]  All right.
[01:38:09.180 --> 01:38:14.180]  What heading do you look under?
[01:38:14.180 --> 01:38:16.180]  Well, I'm not in New York.
[01:38:16.180 --> 01:38:17.180]  I can't tell you that.
[01:38:17.180 --> 01:38:19.180]  You're going to have to go find that.
[01:38:19.180 --> 01:38:22.180]  But here's the thing you want to be looking for.
[01:38:22.180 --> 01:38:26.180]  You want to be looking for the phrase prima facie.
[01:38:26.180 --> 01:38:27.180]  Okay.
[01:38:27.180 --> 01:38:39.180]  If you find prima facie in relation to speeding, then your state does not have fixed speed limits.
[01:38:39.180 --> 01:38:45.180]  The speed limit is presumptive, but it is conditionally presumptive.
[01:38:45.180 --> 01:38:51.180]  For instance, which is something else I'm working on for the book and why I'm bringing this up in this manner.
[01:38:51.180 --> 01:39:02.180]  Here in Texas, we have prima facie speed limits, but the statute does not in any place for any way define speeding as an actual offense.
[01:39:02.180 --> 01:39:15.180]  The term offense, misdemeanor, class C, or anything like that does not exist in relation to a speeding allocation or any statute relevant there too.
[01:39:15.180 --> 01:39:16.180]  Okay.
[01:39:16.180 --> 01:39:21.180]  Which is 545.351 and 352 for the most part.
[01:39:21.180 --> 01:39:31.180]  Now, when you read those two statutes, you find out that there is a set of condition precedents that must exist before an allegation of speeding can even be made.
[01:39:31.180 --> 01:39:50.180]  That precedent set of precedents is that the person who is being charged with speeding failed to control their speed so as to avoid a collision with another person or vehicle who is already lawfully upon or entering the highway.
[01:39:50.180 --> 01:39:51.180]  Okay.
[01:39:51.180 --> 01:39:59.180]  That is the only time that the speed itself becomes a factor in the charge.
[01:39:59.180 --> 01:40:00.180]  Okay.
[01:40:00.180 --> 01:40:01.180]  That's Texas.
[01:40:01.180 --> 01:40:02.180]  That's Texas, right?
[01:40:02.180 --> 01:40:17.180]  That's anywhere where the speed limit says prima facie because what that means is on its face disappears to be illegal, but the facts may say otherwise.
[01:40:17.180 --> 01:40:21.180]  It's a presumption.
[01:40:21.180 --> 01:40:23.180]  It is not a fact.
[01:40:23.180 --> 01:40:26.180]  That's the difference.
[01:40:26.180 --> 01:40:30.180]  When it's a presumption, you shouldn't have gotten the ticket.
[01:40:30.180 --> 01:40:31.180]  Am I correct?
[01:40:31.180 --> 01:40:39.180]  A presumption is not a fact and you can only get a conviction for something that is factual, not presumptive.
[01:40:39.180 --> 01:40:40.180]  Right.
[01:40:40.180 --> 01:40:41.180]  Got it.
[01:40:41.180 --> 01:40:44.180]  An element of an offense cannot be presumed.
[01:40:44.180 --> 01:40:47.180]  It must be alleged and proven.
[01:40:47.180 --> 01:40:55.180]  If it cannot be alleged and proven, the offense cannot be proven and thus the offense could not have been committed.
[01:40:55.180 --> 01:40:59.180]  You just explained it perfectly in those last two sentences.
[01:40:59.180 --> 01:41:03.180]  That's what we need when you explain things and you explain them like that.
[01:41:03.180 --> 01:41:08.180]  Well, I never know how any one person is going to lock on to something that's being explained.
[01:41:08.180 --> 01:41:10.180]  Everybody does it a different way.
[01:41:10.180 --> 01:41:21.180]  The one thing I've been told about my ability to teach this to the others is I have a way to eventually water, get it down to the level of the lowest common denominator in the room.
[01:41:21.180 --> 01:41:24.180]  Well, yeah, because we don't have a background like you do.
[01:41:24.180 --> 01:41:25.180]  But it made sense.
[01:41:25.180 --> 01:41:26.180]  Okay, got it.
[01:41:26.180 --> 01:41:28.180]  Now, I'm going to ask you this.
[01:41:28.180 --> 01:41:38.180]  In New York State, a traffic ticket, and I've seen the case law for this, traffic ticket is not considered the proper charging instrument.
[01:41:38.180 --> 01:41:41.180]  Most people don't know that and I could be wrong.
[01:41:41.180 --> 01:42:01.180]  But the New York State Constitution says with all criminal actions, and considering that a traffic ticket is always a criminal act, it's always a criminal violation, then you must be given either an information or an indictment.
[01:42:01.180 --> 01:42:03.180]  Now, since an indictment involves...
[01:42:03.180 --> 01:42:08.180]  Are you sure there is no statute that makes a specific exception for citations?
[01:42:08.180 --> 01:42:09.180]  Yes.
[01:42:09.180 --> 01:42:13.180]  Well, I'm going to word the answer this way.
[01:42:13.180 --> 01:42:23.180]  If you are given, if you have committed a crime of any form and traffic tickets cover crimes, a traffic violation is a crime in New York State.
[01:42:23.180 --> 01:42:25.180]  Okay, stop.
[01:42:25.180 --> 01:42:41.180]  Are you under the incorrect presumption that the legislature is not authorized to categorize crimes and set different procedural and presidential elements for those different classifications?
[01:42:41.180 --> 01:42:43.180]  Well, this is what I've heard attorneys...
[01:42:43.180 --> 01:42:46.180]  I'm not asking what you've heard.
[01:42:46.180 --> 01:42:51.180]  I'm asking you if you have that presumption running through your head.
[01:42:51.180 --> 01:42:54.180]  This is the presumption I have through my head.
[01:42:54.180 --> 01:42:58.180]  This is the New York State Constitution. Let me get it all out.
[01:42:58.180 --> 01:43:08.180]  The New York State Constitution says with all criminal actions, you must be either given, you must be noticed with either an information or an indictment, period.
[01:43:08.180 --> 01:43:12.180]  What section of the New York Constitution?
[01:43:12.180 --> 01:43:14.180]  I don't know, but I read that.
[01:43:14.180 --> 01:43:19.180]  Well, then how can you tell me what it says if you can't tell me where to find it?
[01:43:19.180 --> 01:43:24.180]  Because I found it and I forgot where it was, but I remember what it says.
[01:43:24.180 --> 01:43:28.180]  It says you must be given either an information or an indictment.
[01:43:28.180 --> 01:43:35.180]  Now, since you have been given either one, the judge, the DA, and the cop will try to say that the...
[01:43:35.180 --> 01:43:43.180]  and I've heard them say this before, that the traffic ticket is a shortened information and it's not.
[01:43:43.180 --> 01:43:44.180]  Okay.
[01:43:44.180 --> 01:43:49.180]  This says capital or other infamous crime. Doesn't say every crime.
[01:43:49.180 --> 01:43:54.180]  Hang on just a minute. Let me get the break over with and we'll get back to this.
[01:43:54.180 --> 01:43:55.180]  Hang on just a minute.
[01:43:55.180 --> 01:43:56.180]  Sorry, I got it. I got it.
[01:43:56.180 --> 01:44:25.180]  All right, folks, y'all hang on. We will be right back.
[01:44:26.180 --> 01:44:32.180]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:32.180 --> 01:44:35.180]  We have come to trust Young Jevities so much.
[01:44:35.180 --> 01:44:40.180]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.180 --> 01:44:48.180]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:48.180 --> 01:44:52.180]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevities, you may want to join us.
[01:44:52.180 --> 01:44:59.180]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:59.180 --> 01:45:01.180]  Order now.
[01:45:01.180 --> 01:45:04.180]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.180 --> 01:45:11.180]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course
[01:45:11.180 --> 01:45:15.180]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.180 --> 01:45:19.180]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.180 --> 01:45:23.180]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.180 --> 01:45:28.180]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.180 --> 01:45:34.180]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.180 --> 01:45:39.180]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.180 --> 01:45:43.180]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.180 --> 01:45:52.180]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.180 --> 01:46:14.180]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.180 --> 01:46:29.180]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:29.180 --> 01:46:33.180]  We are now in the final segment of this show, and we are talking to John in New York
[01:46:33.180 --> 01:46:37.180]  about something that is found in the New York State Constitution.
[01:46:37.180 --> 01:46:42.180]  Now, John, before I bring you back on, I want to get through this real quick, and then we'll resume our discussion.
[01:46:42.180 --> 01:46:48.180]  This is Article 1, Section 6 of the New York Constitution's Bill of Rights.
[01:46:48.180 --> 01:46:53.180]  No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime,
[01:46:53.180 --> 01:46:58.180]  capital being one that is punishable by the death sentence,
[01:46:58.180 --> 01:47:06.180]  infamous being one that causes the death or serious bodily injury to another, okay,
[01:47:06.180 --> 01:47:11.180]  or piracy on the high seas or something of that nature.
[01:47:11.180 --> 01:47:18.180]  That's what this is talking about, and then it goes on except for in certain cases of impeachment,
[01:47:18.180 --> 01:47:24.180]  cases of militia when in actual service, and the land, air, and naval forces in time of war
[01:47:24.180 --> 01:47:29.180]  in which the state may have in place at the time, okay,
[01:47:29.180 --> 01:47:35.180]  unless on indictment of a grand jury except that a person held for the action of a grand jury
[01:47:35.180 --> 01:47:40.180]  upon a charge or such an offense other than one punishable by death or life imprisonment
[01:47:40.180 --> 01:47:45.180]  with the consent of the district attorney may waive indictment by a grand jury
[01:47:45.180 --> 01:47:49.180]  and consent to be prosecuted on an information filed by the district attorney.
[01:47:49.180 --> 01:47:53.180]  Such waiver shall be evidenced by written instruments signed by the defendant and open court
[01:47:53.180 --> 01:47:57.180]  in the presence of his or her counsel, okay?
[01:47:57.180 --> 01:48:05.180]  Now, that is all it says about indictments and information in relation to criminal charges in New York.
[01:48:05.180 --> 01:48:15.180]  Nowhere in that can it be inferred that such application applies to any and all classification of criminal offenses
[01:48:15.180 --> 01:48:22.180]  because the Constitution itself specifically says capital and infamous crimes.
[01:48:22.180 --> 01:48:27.180]  Doesn't say anything about anything else.
[01:48:27.180 --> 01:48:31.180]  All right, got it.
[01:48:31.180 --> 01:48:39.180]  Now, there may be something in your state rules of criminal procedure that says otherwise specifically,
[01:48:39.180 --> 01:48:44.180]  but you need to find it because it's not here.
[01:48:44.180 --> 01:48:49.180]  All right, in the criminal procedure, right?
[01:48:49.180 --> 01:48:52.180]  That would be the presumption if you're saying that New York says they're crimes,
[01:48:52.180 --> 01:48:59.180]  but I've seen something that says that a lot of them in New York are civil infractions, not crimes.
[01:48:59.180 --> 01:49:05.180]  Well, like parking in a parking meter and you're overtaken, that would be an infraction.
[01:49:05.180 --> 01:49:11.180]  Well, I haven't studied New York law enough to know where it makes distinctions and where it does not.
[01:49:11.180 --> 01:49:16.180]  I just know that not every traffic offense in New York is a crime.
[01:49:16.180 --> 01:49:18.180]  Some of them are civil infractions.
[01:49:18.180 --> 01:49:22.180]  To what degree I have not researched.
[01:49:22.180 --> 01:49:26.180]  Right, speeding is a crime, trust me.
[01:49:26.180 --> 01:49:30.180]  How can I trust you? You hadn't even read the Constitution and understood it right.
[01:49:30.180 --> 01:49:32.180]  How can I trust you? That's my point.
[01:49:32.180 --> 01:49:40.180]  This is why I tell you, read this stuff before you start asserting facts about it.
[01:49:40.180 --> 01:49:46.180]  Make sure you understand it because when you're making an argument and you aren't basing it upon facts
[01:49:46.180 --> 01:49:52.180]  you can pull up out of the text, you're standing on very shaky ground.
[01:49:52.180 --> 01:49:55.180]  All right, I'm just going by what they prosecute you as.
[01:49:55.180 --> 01:50:03.180]  Again, the whole premise of you having to learn to do this for yourself is based upon the concepts
[01:50:03.180 --> 01:50:09.180]  that these idiots don't know what the hell they're doing and they really don't care.
[01:50:09.180 --> 01:50:16.180]  And yet you want to argue that you're basing your understanding on something one of these morons told you
[01:50:16.180 --> 01:50:21.180]  or a lot of these same morons told you. Do you see a problem with that?
[01:50:21.180 --> 01:50:28.180]  Moron is right. I won't get into it. But what's happened recently, I am convinced.
[01:50:28.180 --> 01:50:32.180]  There was a New York Times article and that was right on the money.
[01:50:32.180 --> 01:50:39.180]  It said they examined courts all over New York State and they were either corrupt or the judges
[01:50:39.180 --> 01:50:47.180]  and the personnel had no idea how the courts were supposed to proceed and what they were supposed to do.
[01:50:47.180 --> 01:50:54.180]  And people get left and right. They get a good wing left and right because of it.
[01:50:54.180 --> 01:50:59.180]  Okay, so we're back to what I just asked you. Why in the world are you throwing something to me about
[01:50:59.180 --> 01:51:03.180]  I'm basing what I'm asking you on something these people told me.
[01:51:03.180 --> 01:51:07.180]  Yeah, I got it. I got it. Yeah, I got it. Okay.
[01:51:07.180 --> 01:51:13.180]  All right, thanks for the information. You first gave me, I think that solves a lot of the problem.
[01:51:13.180 --> 01:51:19.180]  I just went into this other thing to see how factual it was and I can see there's some real holes in it.
[01:51:19.180 --> 01:51:23.180]  Okay, got it. Okay.
[01:51:23.180 --> 01:51:33.180]  All right. The other one is, there is another one and the other one, traffic tickets are insufficient.
[01:51:33.180 --> 01:51:38.180]  Hold on.
[01:51:38.180 --> 01:51:42.180]  Give me a second here.
[01:51:42.180 --> 01:51:46.180]  Traffic tickets are not proper charging instruments.
[01:51:46.180 --> 01:51:51.180]  This goes in the same argument we just had regarding complaints and indictments.
[01:51:51.180 --> 01:51:58.180]  Hold on. Hold on. No, this is different. They're not proper charging instruments because the traffic ticket has to address
[01:51:58.180 --> 01:52:02.180]  all the elements and it doesn't address the element of whether it's a commercial.
[01:52:02.180 --> 01:52:16.180]  Well, that part is generally true enough in every citation, though there are states where the statute itself says that they can use it even though it doesn't meet the full criteria set forth for a proper and valid complaint.
[01:52:16.180 --> 01:52:29.180]  That's why I asked you, are you 100% certain that there is not a state law giving specific exception to such requirements when it comes to a traffic citation?
[01:52:29.180 --> 01:52:32.180]  No, I have no knowledge of that.
[01:52:32.180 --> 01:52:38.180]  Okay, that again is not the correct answer to the question because no knowledge can mean one of two things.
[01:52:38.180 --> 01:52:46.180]  I have no idea such a statute exists or I thoroughly read all the statutes and I have never found one that says that.
[01:52:46.180 --> 01:52:55.180]  Can you honestly tell me that it's the latter and not the former?
[01:52:55.180 --> 01:53:00.180]  All I know is it's supposed to address a statute.
[01:53:00.180 --> 01:53:07.180]  Okay, that is again, all you know is not based upon an answer to my question, at least not yet.
[01:53:07.180 --> 01:53:16.180]  Yeah, well, let me finish it. It has to address all the elements and it doesn't address the element of whether it's commercial or private.
[01:53:16.180 --> 01:53:33.180]  Again, is there a statute or have you exhausted the reading of the statutes so as to not be able to find a statute that makes a specific exception for traffic citations?
[01:53:33.180 --> 01:53:35.180]  I don't know that one exists.
[01:53:35.180 --> 01:53:42.180]  Okay, that I don't know part is a killer to your argument.
[01:53:42.180 --> 01:53:50.180]  I got it. Okay. Thank you very much.
[01:53:50.180 --> 01:53:52.180]  Okay, well, you're welcome.
[01:53:52.180 --> 01:53:59.180]  But the fact of the matter is is I can't give you a complete honest answer without a set of complete honest facts.
[01:53:59.180 --> 01:54:03.180]  Got it. Yeah, I see that. I see that.
[01:54:03.180 --> 01:54:06.180]  All right.
[01:54:06.180 --> 01:54:07.180]  Okay.
[01:54:07.180 --> 01:54:08.180]  All right.
[01:54:08.180 --> 01:54:10.180]  All right, John. Good luck.
[01:54:10.180 --> 01:54:11.180]  You too.
[01:54:11.180 --> 01:54:13.180]  All right. Bye-bye.
[01:54:13.180 --> 01:54:19.180]  All right, four and a half minutes to go and we've got Eric in California. Eric, what can we do for you?
[01:54:19.180 --> 01:54:30.180]  Hey, Eddie, a question. I was wondering if you could use law review journals or anything in them as a defense or cited in court.
[01:54:30.180 --> 01:54:34.180]  Law review journals aren't law. Law review journals aren't opinions.
[01:54:34.180 --> 01:54:43.180]  Law review journals are discussions about opinions and about facts presented in a case to which the opinion applies.
[01:54:43.180 --> 01:54:57.180]  So while law journals are good for learning alternative arguments and theories related to the law that the court may or may not have addressed in their opinion, they are not authoritative as a reference.
[01:54:57.180 --> 01:55:00.180]  Now, if your question is, can you learn from them?
[01:55:00.180 --> 01:55:02.180]  Yes, you can.
[01:55:02.180 --> 01:55:07.180]  If your question is, can you cite one to help your case? No, you can't.
[01:55:07.180 --> 01:55:30.180]  Now, you can cite the case to the article references using the same arguments the article makes as to why the opinion was on the mark or off the mark, but you can't reference the article as being the authoritative basis you're using and what makes your argument valid.
[01:55:30.180 --> 01:55:43.180]  You simply have to make it and you get the court to either change its ruling or get it overturned by a higher court that can overthrow that ruling.
[01:55:43.180 --> 01:56:02.180]  Okay. I forgot what I was going to ask you. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to play Ox Jones and do that, but it's important for clarification that we understand how these things can and can't be used.
[01:56:02.180 --> 01:56:17.180]  No, I've come across a great article from the 1930s in California explaining exactly that the use of the road is what determines whether or not it falls into.
[01:56:17.180 --> 01:56:21.180]  Great. Send me a copy of it. I'll include it in the book.
[01:56:21.180 --> 01:56:25.180]  Oh, okay. I think I sent it to the Facebook group.
[01:56:25.180 --> 01:56:35.180]  Don't send it to the group. Email it to me directly. eddedieatruleoflawradio.com. You bury it in Facebook. I won't ever go looking for it.
[01:56:35.180 --> 01:56:41.180]  Okay. You got it. I'll email it to you.
[01:56:41.180 --> 01:56:58.180]  I talked to a couple of law librarians out here about trying to find the single subject clause from the legislative bill and they just get this blank look on their face and there's not much help there.
[01:56:58.180 --> 01:57:04.180]  And I was wondering if you had any advice or suggestions of where else I could look or what I should be doing that I'm not doing.
[01:57:04.180 --> 01:57:21.180]  Well, the one thing that all of my research, reading and experiences have never taught me to increase is the IQ of the people you're having to deal with.
[01:57:21.180 --> 01:57:23.180]  Does that kind of answer your question?
[01:57:23.180 --> 01:57:26.180]  Yeah.
[01:57:26.180 --> 01:57:40.180]  You can never teach a fact to someone who has no interest and desire in knowing the fact or that rejects the fact because it interferes with their cognitive ability to process the information.
[01:57:40.180 --> 01:57:49.180]  They've already staked their soul on regardless of how wrong it may be.
[01:57:49.180 --> 01:57:50.180]  Okay.
[01:57:50.180 --> 01:58:01.180]  So like I was telling the other caller, the best thing to do is to educate yourself regardless of who you're dealing with and be better at their job than they are.
[01:58:01.180 --> 01:58:03.180]  That's how you beat them.
[01:58:03.180 --> 01:58:09.180]  We should be looking at the 1960s for the single subject clause.
[01:58:09.180 --> 01:58:11.180]  Say that again.
[01:58:11.180 --> 01:58:16.180]  We should be looking in the 1960s, 70s for when California.
[01:58:16.180 --> 01:58:29.180]  Well, knowing what the single subject clause is and how it applies to the law can help provided you can show that they're using it or created a law that deals with more than one subject in violation of that reference in the Constitution.
[01:58:29.180 --> 01:58:30.180]  Okay.
[01:58:30.180 --> 01:58:31.180]  Okay.
[01:58:31.180 --> 01:58:32.180]  All right, man.
[01:58:32.180 --> 01:58:33.180]  I am out of time, but thanks for calling.
[01:58:33.180 --> 01:58:34.180]  All right, folks.
[01:58:34.180 --> 01:58:37.180]  This has been Rule of Law Radio's Monday Night Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:37.180 --> 01:58:40.180]  I want to thank you all for listening and for all calling in.
[01:58:40.180 --> 01:58:44.180]  Please keep us in your financial prayers and in your financial capabilities.
[01:58:44.180 --> 01:58:46.180]  Good night.
[01:58:46.180 --> 01:59:15.180]  Yes.
[01:59:16.180 --> 01:59:38.180]  Thank you.
[01:59:38.180 --> 01:59:56.180]  Thank you.