ROL_2019-05-03_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:05.780] The following newsflash is brought to you by The Low Star Lowdown, providing your deli
[00:05.780 --> 00:13.480] bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.480 --> 00:21.280] into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.280 --> 00:29.080] Markets for Wazeva 6th of February 2019, open with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce, silver $15.77
[00:29.080 --> 00:36.720] an ounce, copper $2.83 an ounce, oil Texas crude $3.66 a barrel, Brent crude $61.98 a
[00:36.720 --> 00:45.560] barrel, and cryptos in order of market capitalization, Bitcoin $3,401.64, Ripple XRP $0.29, Ethereum
[00:45.560 --> 00:51.640] $10.10 and Eos is at $2.32 a crypto coin.
[00:51.640 --> 00:59.600] Today in History, the year 1918, British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property
[00:59.600 --> 01:04.520] qualifications get the right to vote when the Representation of the People Act of 1918
[01:04.520 --> 01:09.560] was passed by parliament today in history.
[01:09.560 --> 01:14.200] In recent news, several Texas-based organizations filed a lawsuit today requesting that a federal
[01:14.200 --> 01:18.960] court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally registered
[01:18.960 --> 01:19.960] to vote.
[01:19.960 --> 01:24.600] The lawsuit was compiled after an 11-month-long investigation by the Office of the Texas Secretary
[01:24.600 --> 01:30.040] of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens
[01:30.040 --> 01:33.320] who were registered to vote when obtaining age-arguage license.
[01:33.320 --> 01:37.040] Over half of the 95,000 did indeed vote, it seems.
[01:37.040 --> 01:41.040] However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were
[01:41.040 --> 01:45.240] not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:45.240 --> 01:50.880] Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:50.880 --> 01:55.240] Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond
[01:55.240 --> 01:57.080] with proof of eligibility.
[01:57.080 --> 02:01.240] Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have
[02:01.240 --> 02:09.000] yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[02:09.000 --> 02:14.400] A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck after
[02:14.400 --> 02:16.920] a vape pen exploded while he was using it.
[02:16.920 --> 02:20.640] It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[02:20.640 --> 02:24.240] An X-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem.
[02:24.240 --> 02:30.440] The vape store, Smoke and Vape-DZ, has refused to comment.
[02:30.440 --> 02:35.200] First-Edition Anchorwoman Kristin Diaz interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of
[02:35.200 --> 02:40.160] Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
[02:40.160 --> 02:44.600] Conference, which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February
[02:44.600 --> 02:47.440] 14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[02:47.440 --> 02:50.440] You can find the interview at kiiitv.com.
[02:50.440 --> 02:59.440] This is Rick Rode with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[02:59.440 --> 03:28.440] Wow, I am feeling really good, it's a real problem, yeah, so if anybody can hear me, I
[03:28.440 --> 03:35.440] can only hear by myself, I'm making a sound, so I have to check and make sure the sound
[03:35.440 --> 03:36.440] is working.
[03:36.440 --> 03:43.440] My apologies to this new patient for listening to me, I'm really working and I just can't
[03:43.440 --> 03:44.440] hear.
[03:44.440 --> 03:46.440] Can you hear a beeping, beeping?
[03:46.440 --> 03:49.440] Okay, okay, thank you.
[03:49.440 --> 04:11.160] Not now, okay, now everything should be working, somehow my systems changed what it was doing
[04:11.160 --> 04:12.920] on me when I wasn't looking.
[04:12.920 --> 04:22.600] Okay, this is Reddy Kelton, root of law radio on this the third day of May 2019 and I don't
[04:22.600 --> 04:32.320] have my producer here, so I may be a little bit shaky on the board as I am trying to run
[04:32.320 --> 04:36.400] everything and I'm old and I don't multitask well.
[04:36.400 --> 04:41.760] Okay, I am turning on the call boards.
[04:41.760 --> 04:48.160] Call boards are on, we'll be taking your calls all night, call in number 512-646-1984,
[04:48.160 --> 04:54.120] if you have a question or comment, give us a call and I'm going to start out with a little
[04:54.120 --> 05:04.200] bit of an update, I have been for some time working on a proof of concept for the questionnaire
[05:04.200 --> 05:11.080] tool that we're working on and I know that most everybody listening gets tired of hearing
[05:11.080 --> 05:22.160] about this project because it is incredibly profound if I can get it up, but there is
[05:22.160 --> 05:25.960] such a massive amount of work to do.
[05:25.960 --> 05:36.360] I have a tremendous amount done, but things are not as easy as we would hope they are.
[05:36.360 --> 05:41.560] I guess if it was easy someone else would have already done it, so I've only been working
[05:41.560 --> 05:47.080] on it about 10 or 12 years now, but the pieces are coming together.
[05:47.080 --> 05:57.160] My programmer just assured me today that the SEC questionnaire portion is implemented.
[05:57.160 --> 06:06.360] So we have the questionnaires up, we have the software to access the questionnaires and
[06:06.360 --> 06:11.680] the questionnaires will start producing output reports.
[06:11.680 --> 06:20.640] So the software is essentially up and in place, it has some upgrades that I have developed
[06:20.640 --> 06:31.400] as I'm building this tool since the SEC tool was so complex, I can't imagine a code being
[06:31.400 --> 06:39.040] more complex and convoluted than these SEC codes, it appears as though they were very
[06:39.040 --> 06:45.560] deliberately written so that they could not be read and understood, at least by normal
[06:45.560 --> 06:47.560] human beings.
[06:47.560 --> 06:54.720] And that forced me to dramatically increase my technology.
[06:54.720 --> 06:57.880] And most of it I have implemented, especially crowdfunding.
[06:57.880 --> 07:04.120] Crowdfunding is the last thing I did, so it has the latest technologies in it.
[07:04.120 --> 07:11.840] The other, the regulation A and regulation D, they're working correctly, but some of
[07:11.840 --> 07:16.960] the fine points are not in there yet, but if you don't know what they are, you couldn't
[07:16.960 --> 07:18.600] tell anyway.
[07:18.600 --> 07:26.000] So we're about ready to begin to launch this thing in this specific space.
[07:26.000 --> 07:36.040] We have a very high-placed lobbyist on board in D.C. who has been waiting for this so he
[07:36.040 --> 07:39.800] would have a proof of concept, so we can take it to the Justice Department and see if we
[07:39.800 --> 07:44.640] can get this thing implemented with the Justice Department.
[07:44.640 --> 07:50.280] So things are moving along really well.
[07:50.280 --> 07:54.160] And we're already getting some callers, so I won't spend too much time on this.
[07:54.160 --> 08:02.360] Just be patient with me, I'm putting these pieces together, we had to do the SEC part.
[08:02.360 --> 08:08.480] It's a strategy to develop the investment that we need.
[08:08.480 --> 08:13.280] So we're very close to launching that, this thing could pop any day.
[08:13.280 --> 08:24.400] Once we start promoting these questionnaires in the crypto space, one decent contract will
[08:24.400 --> 08:26.960] get everything rolling.
[08:26.960 --> 08:36.600] So excited, we're close, things are picking up, before too long we will be up and rolling.
[08:36.600 --> 08:41.160] We've got a couple of callers on the board already, I'm going to go to Sonny in Georgia,
[08:41.160 --> 08:45.120] hello Sonny, what do you have for us today?
[08:45.120 --> 08:49.160] Good evening Randy, how are you doing?
[08:49.160 --> 08:52.160] I'm doing good, I don't care what everybody says.
[08:52.160 --> 08:56.720] That's excellent, that is excellent.
[08:56.720 --> 09:08.920] I've got a couple of questions, I was doing some research on Six Amendment Council and
[09:08.920 --> 09:18.680] one of the things that I noticed, well in my case I was trying to get the judge to let
[09:18.680 --> 09:28.760] me have assistance of council but without representation of council and that I wanted
[09:28.760 --> 09:38.640] the assistance of council to be non-bar people of my choice.
[09:38.640 --> 09:43.640] So you're asking for council of your choice.
[09:43.640 --> 09:46.240] Yes.
[09:46.240 --> 09:52.480] And as I read the constitution, that's the constitutional right, so this is a good constitutional
[09:52.480 --> 10:01.920] issue to do an interlocatory appeal all the way up to the Supreme.
[10:01.920 --> 10:07.720] What would be involved with an interlocatory appeal, would that be filed in through the
[10:07.720 --> 10:08.720] court?
[10:08.720 --> 10:17.000] No, you file that with the Court of Appeals and you file the interlocatory because if
[10:17.000 --> 10:25.000] you are forced to move ahead without council of your choice, it can cause a harm that cannot
[10:25.000 --> 10:27.280] be remedied.
[10:27.280 --> 10:36.240] It will cost you the time and effort of defending yourself by yourself, it will cost the state
[10:36.240 --> 10:46.360] the time and effort of holding the trials when they could all well be rendered moot.
[10:46.360 --> 10:52.480] If the court decides that you do in fact have a right to council of your choice.
[10:52.480 --> 10:58.480] So you file an interlocatory appeal and the Court of Appeals is going to deny it and then
[10:58.480 --> 11:08.000] you file an appeal of the denial with the state supreme and they're going to deny it
[11:08.000 --> 11:17.600] and then you file it with the, you file a complaint, you appeal it to the federal court
[11:17.600 --> 11:23.600] of appeals because it goes to a constitutional issue and then all the way up to the Supreme,
[11:23.600 --> 11:30.960] that'll take two or three years.
[11:30.960 --> 11:31.960] You there?
[11:31.960 --> 11:32.960] Yeah.
[11:32.960 --> 11:33.960] Okay.
[11:33.960 --> 11:38.920] I was, I was waiting for, I just, holy mackerel, that's wonderful.
[11:38.920 --> 11:48.160] Well, I'm, I'm just, but where I am right now is when I was denied this, I was denied
[11:48.160 --> 11:53.840] this, that trial and I guess that was a year and a half to two years ago.
[11:53.840 --> 11:57.400] So would the interlocatory appeal still be in order?
[11:57.400 --> 12:00.520] No, too late.
[12:00.520 --> 12:03.120] That needed to be done before trial.
[12:03.120 --> 12:05.120] Oh, okay.
[12:05.120 --> 12:11.960] Well, I'm, I'm post-judgment, um, the, the judge railroaded me.
[12:11.960 --> 12:12.960] Okay.
[12:12.960 --> 12:18.120] So you thought you can file the claim as a constitutional claim that you were denied
[12:18.120 --> 12:26.080] your right to counsel of choice in, in your appeal and you can expect the state as one
[12:26.080 --> 12:30.440] of the errors and that's the one that'll get you to the supreme.
[12:30.440 --> 12:32.440] You may have more.
[12:32.440 --> 12:33.440] Yes.
[12:33.440 --> 12:34.440] Yes.
[12:34.440 --> 12:39.960] I'll, I'll definitely have more, I'm going to have a, quite a, quite a bit of issues
[12:39.960 --> 12:45.280] because this, this, this judge, you'll say and give somebody enough rope and, uh, but
[12:45.280 --> 12:46.680] then do the rest.
[12:46.680 --> 12:47.680] Yes.
[12:47.680 --> 12:50.560] So are you going after the judge criminally?
[12:50.560 --> 12:52.960] Uh, not yet.
[12:52.960 --> 13:03.040] I, I have been, um, just researching, researching, researching, as it stands right now, I am,
[13:03.040 --> 13:05.560] I've not yet filed my appeal.
[13:05.560 --> 13:08.760] I've not yet paid my fee.
[13:08.760 --> 13:18.080] I filed a motion to have the fee filing, uh, to file the appeal from the clerk of court
[13:18.080 --> 13:27.160] to have that be weighed and so it sat for almost a year and they didn't do anything
[13:27.160 --> 13:28.160] at all.
[13:28.160 --> 13:29.160] Okay.
[13:29.160 --> 13:38.280] Does it say anything in Georgia law about how long the clerk has to object to your filing
[13:38.280 --> 13:43.480] for inability to pay?
[13:43.480 --> 13:49.360] In Texas, I think it's 30 days or might be less than that.
[13:49.360 --> 13:57.400] I think it might be 10 or 15 days and if they don't file in time, then they can't file.
[13:57.400 --> 14:01.400] And I know it's less than a year.
[14:01.400 --> 14:07.280] Well, what, what, what does, what, what does that mean?
[14:07.280 --> 14:10.440] That means it's default.
[14:10.440 --> 14:21.200] If the clerk does not raise an objection, then they're the only ones that can object.
[14:21.200 --> 14:27.680] The clerk, I think the clerk and the court reporter.
[14:27.680 --> 14:32.120] So they have to raise their objection within a specified amount of time.
[14:32.120 --> 14:37.800] In Texas, you've got 30 days to respond to a motion, but I think on a motion for inability
[14:37.800 --> 14:46.240] to pay, if nobody objects to it, then the court essentially has to grant it default.
[14:46.240 --> 14:52.960] If the clerk or the court reporter objects, then they have a hearing and the court just
[14:52.960 --> 14:58.560] determines whether or not you are granted that or not because those are the only two
[14:58.560 --> 15:02.760] parties that are directly affected.
[15:02.760 --> 15:08.040] So if you filed a motion and it's been over a year, then that becomes a default action.
[15:08.040 --> 15:11.320] Did you do anything to move the case of all?
[15:11.320 --> 15:17.320] No, I filed the motion and I did not hear a peep from them for 11 months.
[15:17.320 --> 15:25.920] Then after 11 months, the judge called a conference, a status conference, which I didn't even think
[15:25.920 --> 15:30.600] you could address a motion in a status conference, but he did.
[15:30.600 --> 15:36.440] He got around ruling on the motion and writing by asking status conference, just telling
[15:36.440 --> 15:41.120] me orally, oh, well, I'm just going to deny your motion.
[15:41.120 --> 15:42.600] That should get an interlocutory.
[15:42.600 --> 15:45.280] How long ago was that?
[15:45.280 --> 15:47.480] Less than two weeks.
[15:47.480 --> 15:48.480] Okay.
[15:48.480 --> 15:58.000] Well, it now make up an interlocutory appeal claiming that you have a right to inability
[15:58.000 --> 16:07.600] to pay because the clerk and the court reporter defaulted, they failed to file an objection.
[16:07.600 --> 16:13.560] So you had a right to it as a matter of law and then that stops everything.
[16:13.560 --> 16:24.080] Another interesting point on this is that by George's status, the judge has 90 days
[16:24.080 --> 16:28.400] to rule on a motion or it's an impeachable offense.
[16:28.400 --> 16:29.400] No.
[16:29.400 --> 16:30.400] No.
[16:30.400 --> 16:31.400] Oh, okay.
[16:31.400 --> 16:36.400] Dude, are you saying in Georgia law?
[16:36.400 --> 16:37.400] Yes.
[16:37.400 --> 16:38.400] Oh.
[16:38.400 --> 16:39.400] Yeah.
[16:39.400 --> 16:47.400] And so I hear the music, but I can, let's talk about impeachment when we come back.
[16:47.400 --> 16:56.760] Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, I call it number 512-646-1984, we'll be right back.
[16:56.760 --> 17:05.440] Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic similar in today's America.
[17:05.440 --> 17:08.480] We live in an us against them society and if we, the people are ever going to have a
[17:08.480 --> 17:12.280] free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[17:12.280 --> 17:15.320] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[17:15.320 --> 17:19.360] in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law.
[17:19.360 --> 17:23.200] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[17:23.200 --> 17:24.760] our rights through due process.
[17:24.760 --> 17:28.560] Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the
[17:28.560 --> 17:32.320] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[17:32.320 --> 17:34.400] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[17:34.400 --> 17:38.720] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[17:38.720 --> 17:40.040] ordering your copy today.
[17:40.040 --> 17:43.400] By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code,
[17:43.400 --> 17:47.800] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[17:47.800 --> 17:50.120] documents and other useful resource material.
[17:50.120 --> 17:54.080] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[17:54.080 --> 18:00.640] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:00.640 --> 18:05.960] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.960 --> 18:09.400] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meyers Proven Method.
[18:09.400 --> 18:13.760] Michael Meyers has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.760 --> 18:14.760] can win two.
[18:14.760 --> 18:19.560] You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.560 --> 18:25.360] civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.360 --> 18:29.960] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:29.960 --> 18:34.200] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.200 --> 18:39.320] The Michael Meyers Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.320 --> 18:41.440] Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.440 --> 18:47.000] For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meyers banner
[18:47.000 --> 18:49.960] or email michaelmeyers at yahoo.com.
[18:49.960 --> 18:57.680] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.680 --> 19:07.680] To learn how to stop debt collectors next, you are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:07.680 --> 19:32.960] at yahoo.com.
[19:32.960 --> 19:34.840] Okay, we are back.
[19:34.840 --> 19:40.960] Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Sonny and Georgia.
[19:40.960 --> 19:52.960] Okay, Sonny, so tell me about this statute that requires a judge to rule within 90 days.
[19:52.960 --> 20:08.800] Okay, it's 15-6-21 and it says it's entitled Time for Deciding Motions, it is for Superior
[20:08.800 --> 20:18.920] Courts Chapter 6 and it says noncompliance as ground for impeachment.
[20:18.920 --> 20:26.040] So Part B says it shall be the duty, this is for counties with more than 100,000 inhabitants,
[20:26.040 --> 20:37.760] it shall be the duty of the judge if not providentially hindered or unless the counsel or the defendant
[20:37.760 --> 20:48.600] agree in writing to extend the time to decide promptly within 90 days after it has been argued
[20:48.600 --> 20:56.720] before him or submitted to him without argument.
[20:56.720 --> 21:07.720] All motions for new trials, injunctions, demers, and all other motions of any nature.
[21:07.720 --> 21:15.240] So all motions of any nature, that applies to my motion and it was submitted to him without
[21:15.240 --> 21:23.560] argument and so he has a duty within 90 days to decide it.
[21:23.560 --> 21:28.040] That seems pretty clear.
[21:28.040 --> 21:34.040] Now do you, okay, you have a statute, a official misconduct statute in Georgia.
[21:34.040 --> 21:36.480] I don't know if we do.
[21:36.480 --> 21:38.600] Yeah, we do, I've seen it.
[21:38.600 --> 21:46.280] I was helping someone else in Georgia and just look up official misconduct and you'll
[21:46.280 --> 21:48.720] find the statute.
[21:48.720 --> 21:57.040] So if the judge, if a official fails to perform a duty he's required to perform and in the
[21:57.040 --> 22:04.760] process denies the citizen full and free access to or enjoying the right, that's the crime.
[22:04.760 --> 22:14.480] So you file against him criminally and then impeachment.
[22:14.480 --> 22:22.720] Impeachment is not quite quawaranto but it's close enough, you need to look up how impeachment
[22:22.720 --> 22:24.840] is done.
[22:24.840 --> 22:29.040] I've done a little research on that and there's two ways.
[22:29.040 --> 22:35.520] One is through the legislature where it would have to be, it would have to go through the
[22:35.520 --> 22:46.120] House first and then vote it on by the Senate, which I also read that in Georgia over maybe
[22:46.120 --> 22:50.600] the last 15 years maybe there have been two impeachments.
[22:50.600 --> 22:55.320] So not very likely that's going to happen.
[22:55.320 --> 23:00.800] But the other way of impeachment is through the Judicial Conduct Commission, which we
[23:00.800 --> 23:04.240] got the Fox Garden, the Hinton House there.
[23:04.240 --> 23:09.920] Well and then you still have the Avenue of Criminal Prosecution.
[23:09.920 --> 23:12.600] You can run the whole routine on them.
[23:12.600 --> 23:20.880] Now in Georgia you can file a, oh what's the name of it, there's a document that cost
[23:20.880 --> 23:31.200] you 20 bucks to file and it's a criminal complaint that requires the court to hold a preliminary
[23:31.200 --> 23:41.000] hearing and the statute requires them to subpoena the accused.
[23:41.000 --> 23:48.080] Send me an email after the show and I will send, I've got one that I built for this guy
[23:48.080 --> 23:55.720] in Georgia that I'm helping and I've got a one, I fill in the blank, it's BDF fill in
[23:55.720 --> 24:02.680] the blank and you just fill in the blanks, take it down to the magistrate court and file
[24:02.680 --> 24:07.280] it and the magistrate court of course is just going to blow it off, that's what they always
[24:07.280 --> 24:12.760] do and then you file against the magistrate with the next hire court and he'll blow it
[24:12.760 --> 24:20.040] off and then you file against that court with the next hire and just work it up to the supreme
[24:20.040 --> 24:24.080] and once you've gotten to the supreme and the Supreme Court justices refuse to act
[24:24.080 --> 24:32.120] on it then you file against all of them in the Fed for the dollar due process and really
[24:32.120 --> 24:35.880] stir them up.
[24:35.880 --> 24:51.520] Yeah, I've got, he called me back I think on Tuesday, he wants me to pay the filing
[24:51.520 --> 24:55.960] fee with his over $700 maybe $750 or something like that.
[24:55.960 --> 25:03.480] He wants me to pay the filing fee and he told me, he ordered me not to file any more frivolous
[25:03.480 --> 25:05.600] motions.
[25:05.600 --> 25:11.480] Now a frivolous motion, I would have to be a mind reader if I understand this correctly
[25:11.480 --> 25:16.600] because he's the only one who can decide whether it's frivolous or not and that's just whether
[25:16.600 --> 25:20.080] it's his opinion that it's frivolous.
[25:20.080 --> 25:25.200] That should also get an interlocutory appeal.
[25:25.200 --> 25:32.760] So you do both of them, you'll do both issues in the interlocutory.
[25:32.760 --> 25:40.520] Now he's threatened you in order to prevent you from filing motions and he's failed, he's
[25:40.520 --> 25:47.120] to perform a duty that puts him at risk of impeachment and it has the effect of committing
[25:47.120 --> 25:51.000] a criminal act against you, file that with the court of appeals.
[25:51.000 --> 25:56.600] That's not going to make him happy and that'll get the appellate court looking over his
[25:56.600 --> 25:57.600] shoulder.
[25:57.600 --> 26:04.200] This is a good thing about criminal complaints is it poisons them well and in order for the
[26:04.200 --> 26:11.480] court of appeals to protect him, they got to get into trough with him.
[26:11.480 --> 26:21.840] If I filed that interlocutory appeal on Monday, would that stop the hearing on Tuesday?
[26:21.840 --> 26:28.160] Well you can ask for an emergency restraining order from the appellate court and when you
[26:28.160 --> 26:36.360] file it, you give it to the clerk and the clerk should take it to the justices immediately
[26:36.360 --> 26:45.440] and any one of the justices should be able to grant or deny it.
[26:45.440 --> 26:52.560] And then when you get to court, you notice the court that you filed an interlocutory appeal
[26:52.560 --> 26:58.760] and at that point you don't care what the judge does because it's clear he's going to
[26:58.760 --> 27:01.400] rule against you no matter what.
[27:01.400 --> 27:07.680] Well what I'm expecting him to do is say, have you paid the fee and if not, then he's
[27:07.680 --> 27:14.800] going to say, alright, well then he told me last time he was really close to saying you're
[27:14.800 --> 27:17.920] going to have to pay this today or I'm going to lock you up right now.
[27:17.920 --> 27:22.720] I'm not going to let you file your appeal, I'm just going to lock you up.
[27:22.720 --> 27:29.160] Did he say he was going to do that?
[27:29.160 --> 27:35.360] If I remember correctly, I already filed an open records request for the transcript and
[27:35.360 --> 27:39.800] it puts the court reporter failed to acknowledge within three days.
[27:39.800 --> 27:48.000] Okay, open records generally does not apply when you're in a court hearing or when you're
[27:48.000 --> 27:49.000] in litigation.
[27:49.000 --> 27:54.560] Well, I know we have it in Texas that says when you're in litigation, open records doesn't
[27:54.560 --> 27:55.560] apply.
[27:55.560 --> 28:04.840] So you need a third party to ask for it, but even then they have to pay for it.
[28:04.840 --> 28:17.480] So you need to get the interlockatory appeal on the denial of innovative pay and claim that
[28:17.480 --> 28:23.360] the judge is very deliberately trying to deny you and your ability to defend yourself.
[28:23.360 --> 28:31.640] Oh yeah, well he basically told me not to interrupt the prosecutor to let him completely
[28:31.640 --> 28:38.120] finish and then I can say something, which I would think that he literally said he was
[28:38.120 --> 28:42.680] going to find me in contempt of court and lock me up for 20 days if I said anything
[28:42.680 --> 28:47.800] else before the prosecutor finished saying what he was saying.
[28:47.800 --> 28:50.120] File against him for that.
[28:50.120 --> 28:52.120] So now you can object.
[28:52.120 --> 28:53.120] Right.
[28:53.120 --> 28:56.880] You've got a whole stack of things to file against him.
[28:56.880 --> 29:00.480] File against him criminally for that.
[29:00.480 --> 29:05.080] It's, I want to say witness obstruction.
[29:05.080 --> 29:08.360] It's a file obstruction of justice against him.
[29:08.360 --> 29:11.440] These judges think that all you can do is file an appeal.
[29:11.440 --> 29:15.920] File criminally against him.
[29:15.920 --> 29:19.400] That file criminally with the district attorney?
[29:19.400 --> 29:20.400] Yeah.
[29:20.400 --> 29:24.760] No, no, no, don't file with the district attorney.
[29:24.760 --> 29:27.760] File this criminal report.
[29:27.760 --> 29:30.760] Let me look it up while we're talking here.
[29:30.760 --> 29:39.760] If I can remember what's that, but there's in Georgia, Georgia was great.
[29:39.760 --> 29:49.240] They're the only state I've ever seen that has this where you can actually, you literally
[29:49.240 --> 29:55.520] initiate a prosecution yourself.
[29:55.520 --> 30:02.520] The only state we can do that.
[30:02.520 --> 30:07.000] Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under
[30:07.000 --> 30:08.480] the blood alcohol limit.
[30:08.480 --> 30:13.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers and a government
[30:13.400 --> 30:15.920] cover up in a moment.
[30:15.920 --> 30:17.520] Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.520 --> 30:21.120] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.120 --> 30:25.880] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.880 --> 30:30.840] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.840 --> 30:33.640] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.640 --> 30:37.920] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.920 --> 30:41.440] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.440 --> 30:43.640] Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.640 --> 30:47.040] Ever hear the term fine farming?
[30:47.040 --> 30:51.600] It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and it's apparently big business
[30:51.600 --> 30:53.600] in the sunshine state of Florida.
[30:53.600 --> 30:59.760] This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[30:59.760 --> 31:04.480] Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated.
[31:04.480 --> 31:08.120] State officials knew about it for two and a half years but did nothing.
[31:08.120 --> 31:13.120] In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document
[31:13.120 --> 31:14.120] the problem.
[31:14.120 --> 31:19.000] A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life but now that the cover up has been exposed,
[31:19.000 --> 31:21.760] perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[31:21.760 --> 31:26.880] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:26.880 --> 31:35.400] I lost my son, my uncle, on September 11th, 2001.
[31:35.400 --> 31:38.920] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[31:38.920 --> 31:43.120] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:43.120 --> 31:48.920] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7, over 1,200 architects
[31:48.920 --> 31:52.680] and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[31:52.680 --> 31:58.000] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son, go to building what.org.
[31:58.000 --> 32:00.680] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:00.680 --> 32:03.280] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[32:03.280 --> 32:06.240] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[32:06.240 --> 32:09.920] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails but good luck getting
[32:09.920 --> 32:10.920] them to pay for it.
[32:10.920 --> 32:14.560] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails but I'm serious about your roof.
[32:14.560 --> 32:18.360] That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[32:18.360 --> 32:21.120] you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[32:21.120 --> 32:25.400] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with
[32:25.400 --> 32:26.720] zero complaints.
[32:26.720 --> 32:30.960] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right
[32:30.960 --> 32:32.160] the first time.
[32:32.160 --> 32:40.680] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com, mention the crypto show and get $100 off
[32:40.680 --> 32:45.440] and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[32:45.440 --> 32:50.560] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[32:50.560 --> 32:56.560] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:56.560 --> 32:58.840] Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[32:58.840 --> 33:24.840] I mean I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[33:24.840 --> 33:30.680] Okay, we are back.
[33:30.680 --> 33:41.040] Randy Kelton with Rula Radio on this Friday, the third day of May 2019 and before I go
[33:41.040 --> 33:49.000] any further with this, I did find the criminal warrant application on the break but I am
[33:49.000 --> 34:02.760] looking at putting together a seminar, probably a two-day seminar to go over the processes
[34:02.760 --> 34:09.080] that we've developed over the last 12 years of doing this show.
[34:09.080 --> 34:16.720] I do this show in my research law but my primary study has always been psychology and I study
[34:16.720 --> 34:22.000] psychology from an engineer's perspective.
[34:22.000 --> 34:26.000] I don't have philosophies.
[34:26.000 --> 34:35.200] The psychology I study is the psychology of how things actually work.
[34:35.200 --> 34:37.200] Don't care why they work.
[34:37.200 --> 34:42.560] We come up with all these stories to explain why therapeutic metaphor works but at the
[34:42.560 --> 34:47.840] end of the day it doesn't matter why it works, it works.
[34:47.840 --> 34:52.680] Therapeutic metaphor, once you understand what it is, you'll look at it and say, well, people
[34:52.680 --> 34:57.440] have been doing that for thousands of years.
[34:57.440 --> 35:02.280] They just didn't have this fancy name to call it and they didn't have what they're doing
[35:02.280 --> 35:09.520] laid out in structured pieces but it's all pretty straightforward and I've taken those
[35:09.520 --> 35:17.640] tools and over the years developed a set of ways of presenting this information so it
[35:17.640 --> 35:24.080] makes sense to ordinary human beings and there's enough information here that it would take
[35:24.080 --> 35:34.160] probably two days to present all of it and I want to explore putting together a seminar
[35:34.160 --> 35:40.800] probably initially in Austin, I have spent some time isolating all of my emails over
[35:40.800 --> 35:47.920] the years and I've got about almost 5,000 of them and I'm going to send those out with
[35:47.920 --> 35:53.440] inquiries to see who would be willing to come to these seminars.
[35:53.440 --> 35:58.120] If we can get enough interest I'll put together some seminars and see if we can help support
[35:58.120 --> 36:02.760] this radio station because frankly we're really struggling.
[36:02.760 --> 36:09.400] Trying to keep two pieces together and for the most part the hosts have supported this
[36:09.400 --> 36:11.040] station over the years.
[36:11.040 --> 36:16.960] I don't think it's anybody who's donated more to these stations and I'm not talking
[36:16.960 --> 36:21.760] about time, I'm talking about actual cash than the hosts.
[36:21.760 --> 36:28.760] We have paid to keep it on the air and I'm not complaining because it's really been good
[36:28.760 --> 36:34.600] for my life and I get people that want me to do jobs for them so I get some money back
[36:34.600 --> 36:41.400] from it and I take part of that money and I put it back in the show so I'm not complaining
[36:41.400 --> 36:48.080] that the hosts helped to support the show but we're not able to give enough.
[36:48.080 --> 36:55.760] So if anybody's interested in the seminars send me an email, let me know and in case
[36:55.760 --> 37:01.760] I don't already have your email in my database and I'll be sending out some emails if you
[37:01.760 --> 37:06.440] get an email from me about this you'll know what I'm after or what I'm looking at.
[37:06.440 --> 37:13.800] I just want to find out if I've got enough interest to cover the costs of doing this
[37:13.800 --> 37:19.440] because we have to rent a location, there's a lot of work we have to do to do this.
[37:19.440 --> 37:25.880] Anyway, so if you're interested I will send you an email, let me know and I will be sending
[37:25.880 --> 37:30.280] out emails to everybody so if you get one from me and if you've been listening to the
[37:30.280 --> 37:38.080] show a long time you'll realize that this is something we almost never do.
[37:38.080 --> 37:45.200] In all of the time I've been doing this show I've sent out one mass email to everybody
[37:45.200 --> 37:50.640] and it was about a seminar that we held a number of years ago.
[37:50.640 --> 37:59.840] So we don't harass our people who communicate with us with a bunch of garbage and I'm hoping
[37:59.840 --> 38:06.720] that you won't find this to be garbage and if you found some value from what we present
[38:06.720 --> 38:16.200] here on the show, a seminar is a whole different context because I can stitch all the pieces
[38:16.200 --> 38:25.200] together the most I have here is a four hour show and it's constantly interrupted by breaks
[38:25.200 --> 38:34.160] and with a seminar we have more continuity and we can stitch these pieces together.
[38:34.160 --> 38:41.280] So I'm hoping that once we've been through this it creates a one piece that all fits
[38:41.280 --> 38:43.440] together makes sense to everyone.
[38:43.440 --> 38:47.600] So anyway, okay, enough of that, I'm going to go back to Sonny and Georgia.
[38:47.600 --> 38:55.600] Okay, Sonny, I have here criminal warrant application, this warrant application fee and I was looking
[38:55.600 --> 39:01.360] for the actual code that goes with it but if you'll send me a request for this I'll find
[39:01.360 --> 39:10.400] the code that goes with it that actually says the magistrate shall subpoena the accused
[39:10.400 --> 39:20.720] and the accuser gets the opportunity to examine the accused, to question the accused, is that
[39:20.720 --> 39:28.080] cool or what as far as I know that's the only state where you can do that.
[39:28.080 --> 39:33.400] So what's this judge going to do when you file a criminal warrant application against
[39:33.400 --> 39:36.640] him?
[39:36.640 --> 39:38.640] I've been suggesting to people that.
[39:38.640 --> 39:41.840] As soon as they have to just come shoot me.
[39:41.840 --> 39:46.880] No, see that's the problem and that's what everybody thinks.
[39:46.880 --> 39:54.880] The problem is once you start filing criminally against them it poisons them well.
[39:54.880 --> 39:58.760] That's the part of the tools that I use at the seminar.
[39:58.760 --> 39:59.760] This is one of them.
[39:59.760 --> 40:04.880] It's a true story, it actually happened and happened this way but it's an example of
[40:04.880 --> 40:07.560] what happens.
[40:07.560 --> 40:14.960] Next to my house I own a quarter of a block, I own a house and next to it were two houses
[40:14.960 --> 40:21.520] that I bought and tore down and got this huge empty lot and right next to that is City Hall.
[40:21.520 --> 40:27.280] So I was out in this lot next to my house with some of my trucks working on a tank doing
[40:27.280 --> 40:33.520] some plastic welding with a little propane torch and if anybody here knows about plastic
[40:33.520 --> 40:38.440] welding and I tell them I'm doing it with a propane torch that would take some explaining
[40:38.440 --> 40:41.360] but anyway I could explain it.
[40:41.360 --> 40:46.240] So this cop comes up, he didn't know who I was, brand new cop just got hired.
[40:46.240 --> 40:51.800] I said sir, sir, and I turned around and said yes, sir, you can't have that open flank.
[40:51.800 --> 40:57.640] I held the propane torch up and rotated it in my hand and said sure I can, look, nothing
[40:57.640 --> 40:58.640] to it.
[40:58.640 --> 41:03.000] No, no, no, no, you don't understand, we have a fire ban on.
[41:03.000 --> 41:04.920] I said see this equipment here?
[41:04.920 --> 41:07.080] I can outrun the fire department with it.
[41:07.080 --> 41:10.400] I know sir but you can't have that open flank.
[41:10.400 --> 41:13.440] Wait a minute, you're just jostling me right?
[41:13.440 --> 41:14.440] You're just joking.
[41:14.440 --> 41:22.720] Oh no sir, I am not joking, wait a minute, that John Faustel sent you down here, didn't
[41:22.720 --> 41:23.720] he?
[41:23.720 --> 41:28.560] The district judge just because I filed one crummy little making a terroristic threat
[41:28.560 --> 41:33.560] complaint against him with the attorney general, he sent you down here, didn't he?
[41:33.560 --> 41:40.960] And the cop takes a step back, held up both hands with his palms out, one moment sir,
[41:40.960 --> 41:46.120] looks at his cell phone dials, about thirty seconds the chief of police opens the door,
[41:46.120 --> 41:50.840] looked across at us and said, Randy, what are you doing to my new officer?
[41:50.840 --> 41:55.880] Oh Tom, I was just jerking his chain.
[41:55.880 --> 42:03.920] And the cop said, oh God, I saw my whole career pass before my eyes.
[42:03.920 --> 42:10.840] When you start filing criminal charges, you become a protected class.
[42:10.840 --> 42:19.000] Now any time anybody says anything to you that you can construe as threatening, you
[42:19.000 --> 42:26.960] blame the person you filed criminal charges with sending this cop out here to arrest you.
[42:26.960 --> 42:38.360] Well that may have no merit in it whatsoever, but the cop, he's thinking, what is the judge
[42:38.360 --> 42:46.920] going to do to me when this guy files criminal charges against him for what I did?
[42:46.920 --> 42:52.840] I'm going to be in big time hot water, no matter what.
[42:52.840 --> 42:58.120] When you start filing criminal complaints, you poison their well, they do everything
[42:58.120 --> 43:05.680] they can to poison your well, accusing you of filing frivolous motions, that's poisoning
[43:05.680 --> 43:06.680] your well.
[43:06.680 --> 43:12.200] So if I'll file criminal charges against him every time he squeaks and can let him just
[43:12.200 --> 43:19.520] say one word about that, that's obstruction, retaliation.
[43:19.520 --> 43:22.720] I've stood in the courtroom and asked the bailiff to arrest the judge and every time
[43:22.720 --> 43:27.400] I've done that, the judge has stood there and kept his mouth shut because he knew one
[43:27.400 --> 43:31.560] word out of him, witness tampering, obstruction.
[43:31.560 --> 43:34.400] They understand the problem it brings to them.
[43:34.400 --> 43:40.000] So I'm saying criminal charges early, let them know you're coming for me, I'm coming
[43:40.000 --> 43:41.000] for you.
[43:41.000 --> 43:42.840] I'm going to make this cost you.
[43:42.840 --> 43:51.360] Hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll have our radio, call in number 512-646-1984, we'll be right
[43:51.360 --> 44:09.040] there, back.
[44:09.040 --> 44:37.400] We also offer one-world-wide, mountain house storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition
[44:37.400 --> 44:39.600] at 10% above wholesale and more.
[44:39.600 --> 44:43.520] We offer metals IRA accounts and we also accept big coins as payments.
[44:43.520 --> 44:46.520] Call us at 512-646-640.
[44:46.520 --> 44:51.520] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, sweet A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[44:51.520 --> 44:54.680] We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[44:54.680 --> 44:59.520] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-640.
[44:59.520 --> 45:04.520] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.520 --> 45:11.280] In your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[45:11.280 --> 45:14.280] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:14.280 --> 45:19.080] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.080 --> 45:23.320] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.320 --> 45:28.120] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[45:28.120 --> 45:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:52.000] pro-save tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:04.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.000 --> 46:47.000] I'm having trouble hearing you.
[46:47.000 --> 46:53.000] I was just blabbing away and somebody on the break muted my mic.
[46:53.000 --> 46:56.000] Did you do that, Sonny?
[46:56.000 --> 46:58.000] I must have.
[46:58.000 --> 47:03.000] You must have, because I'm a guy and guys never take responsibility for their bad behavior.
[47:03.000 --> 47:06.000] Just ask my wife.
[47:06.000 --> 47:11.000] Okay, criminal complaints.
[47:11.000 --> 47:16.000] If they're going to come after you, you not only have a right,
[47:16.000 --> 47:20.000] but you have a duty.
[47:20.000 --> 47:28.000] Sonny, are you familiar with 18 U.S. Code 4?
[47:28.000 --> 47:31.000] Right up there in the front.
[47:31.000 --> 47:36.000] I mean, it's not 18 U.S. Code 2936 or something.
[47:36.000 --> 47:37.000] It was right up there at the front.
[47:37.000 --> 47:40.000] U.S. Code 3 has been repealed.
[47:40.000 --> 47:46.000] It's actually the third one. It's called misprison of felony.
[47:46.000 --> 47:52.000] If you have knowledge that a felony's been committed and you don't give notice of that knowledge,
[47:52.000 --> 47:57.000] you committed a crime.
[47:57.000 --> 48:00.000] The Fed has it.
[48:00.000 --> 48:04.000] I don't think Georgia has it.
[48:04.000 --> 48:08.000] As a matter of fact, I'm sure Georgia does not have it.
[48:08.000 --> 48:13.000] You're not required to give notice of crime.
[48:13.000 --> 48:19.000] But when you do give notice of crime, you become a protected class.
[48:19.000 --> 48:26.000] You have the same protection that a judge has.
[48:26.000 --> 48:30.000] When you give notice of crime, you do no harm to anyone.
[48:30.000 --> 48:32.000] You don't slander anyone.
[48:32.000 --> 48:34.000] Nothing.
[48:34.000 --> 48:50.000] You give a magistrate, a public official, whose job it is to hear people tell him that I have reason to believe
[48:50.000 --> 48:57.000] and do believe that this person committed this crime based on these facts.
[48:57.000 --> 49:03.000] In Texas, that specific language is mandated.
[49:03.000 --> 49:07.000] That's how a criminal's charge must begin.
[49:07.000 --> 49:10.000] So you're not saying this guy's a criminal.
[49:10.000 --> 49:13.000] You're not slandering him in any way.
[49:13.000 --> 49:18.000] You're merely stating that you have reason to believe and do believe.
[49:18.000 --> 49:26.000] And that filing goes to a magistrate whose job it is to hear those kinds of filings.
[49:26.000 --> 49:33.000] If the magistrate then finds probable cause and initiates a prosecution,
[49:33.000 --> 49:38.000] then it can be construed that the accused was harmed.
[49:38.000 --> 49:41.000] But he's not harmed by you.
[49:41.000 --> 49:45.000] The harm was caused to him by the magistrate.
[49:45.000 --> 49:48.000] And if he has a complaint about it, he can take it to the magistrate.
[49:48.000 --> 49:50.000] He can't bring it to you.
[49:50.000 --> 49:58.000] And then after you have filed a complaint, if anyone says or does anything to you,
[49:58.000 --> 50:03.000] because you filed that complaint, that's obstruction and witness tampering.
[50:03.000 --> 50:07.000] Both of them felonies.
[50:07.000 --> 50:12.000] So you absolutely cannot be sued, period.
[50:12.000 --> 50:15.000] And they had to do that.
[50:15.000 --> 50:20.000] If they didn't do that, then the police would have to figure out everything for themselves
[50:20.000 --> 50:24.000] because the public wouldn't tell them a thing.
[50:24.000 --> 50:30.000] No one would report crime if they had to worry about being sued or being retaliated against.
[50:30.000 --> 50:33.000] So this is consistent in every state.
[50:33.000 --> 50:36.000] You become a protected class.
[50:36.000 --> 50:42.000] This is the part they created that they didn't intend to.
[50:42.000 --> 50:46.000] For them, it was a necessary evil.
[50:46.000 --> 50:49.000] You become a protected class.
[50:49.000 --> 50:52.000] You are protected from them.
[50:52.000 --> 51:03.000] When you file against them, you have the same protection against what they do as if you file against an individual,
[51:03.000 --> 51:06.000] what an individual might do.
[51:06.000 --> 51:15.000] Public officials are in a more precarious position because they have things they must do
[51:15.000 --> 51:19.000] and things they are forbidden to do.
[51:19.000 --> 51:24.000] If they violate either one of those, they're criminally liable.
[51:24.000 --> 51:30.000] If the judge exercises his discretion
[51:30.000 --> 51:38.000] and the discretion does not properly apply the law to the facts,
[51:38.000 --> 51:42.000] that's official misconduct in the state of Georgia.
[51:42.000 --> 51:45.000] And that's a criminal act.
[51:45.000 --> 51:50.000] And if he did that to you after you filed criminal charges against him,
[51:50.000 --> 51:56.000] it's retaliation because he poisoned as well.
[51:56.000 --> 51:59.000] Does that make sense, Georgia?
[51:59.000 --> 52:02.000] Does that make sense, Sonny?
[52:02.000 --> 52:05.000] Yes.
[52:05.000 --> 52:12.000] People tend to wait until they're through with the civil before they start any criminal.
[52:12.000 --> 52:19.000] And I'm saying criminals should be first crack out of the hat.
[52:19.000 --> 52:22.000] Poison their will as quickly as you can.
[52:22.000 --> 52:35.000] Or grieve them at every opportunity. It is clear this judge is going to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[52:35.000 --> 52:38.000] So steam every chance you get.
[52:38.000 --> 52:48.000] Threaten to hold you in contempt if you raise any objection to the prosecutor's presentation.
[52:48.000 --> 52:54.000] Now, that's going to actually go back to what actually went on in court.
[52:54.000 --> 53:03.000] I can think up a scenario where the judge could say that and he wouldn't be in violation of anything.
[53:03.000 --> 53:14.000] If you had been really unruly in court and arguing with the prosecutor instead of voicing objections,
[53:14.000 --> 53:19.000] then I could see where the judge might get a little testy.
[53:19.000 --> 53:29.000] But if you're just making objections and then arguing your objections and he tells you that, then you got a good shot at him.
[53:29.000 --> 53:37.000] But at the end of the day, who cares if it's a good shot or not?
[53:37.000 --> 53:41.000] When in doubt, file.
[53:41.000 --> 53:53.000] Yeah, at the time, I was objecting to the prosecutor testifying or entering any evidence.
[53:53.000 --> 54:02.000] And I was objecting to talking about the motion at a status conference.
[54:02.000 --> 54:13.000] And I just let the court know that the status of this motion is that it's been sitting on the court's desk for 11 months and the court hasn't ruled on it.
[54:13.000 --> 54:23.000] And I asked him if he had read the motion, read the whole motion, and he said that he hadn't read the whole motion that he didn't have to.
[54:23.000 --> 54:25.000] Okay, perfect.
[54:25.000 --> 54:27.000] File criminally against him.
[54:27.000 --> 54:31.000] That's official misconduct.
[54:31.000 --> 54:36.000] That's denying you in the right to petition the court for redress of grievance.
[54:36.000 --> 54:47.000] Right, he doesn't have to, but he can be charged criminally if he doesn't.
[54:47.000 --> 54:51.000] So absolutely file against him for that.
[54:51.000 --> 55:00.000] Let him explain to a court of appeals or a grand jury why he doesn't have to bother reading your motions and pleadings.
[55:00.000 --> 55:05.000] Especially a grand jury.
[55:05.000 --> 55:18.000] Another one that he hasn't dealt with is my emotions is disqualify him, which has also been sitting for 11 months.
[55:18.000 --> 55:24.000] What does Georgia Code say about that?
[55:24.000 --> 55:26.000] About motion to disqualify.
[55:26.000 --> 55:28.000] What's the process?
[55:28.000 --> 55:31.000] Okay, motion to disqualify.
[55:31.000 --> 55:46.000] In Georgia, the motion to disqualify will lead to, if it's affirmed, then the judge will recuse himself.
[55:46.000 --> 55:48.000] No, no, no, hold on, hold on.
[55:48.000 --> 55:49.000] Step back.
[55:49.000 --> 55:52.000] Let me explain what it is in Texas.
[55:52.000 --> 56:02.000] When a motion to disqualify or a motion to recuse is filed, the judge can voluntarily recuse himself.
[56:02.000 --> 56:11.000] If he doesn't, then he must forward the motion to the head administrative judge of the district who will appoint a judge to hear the motion.
[56:11.000 --> 56:17.000] The head administrative judge can hear it himself or he can appoint another judge to hear the motion.
[56:17.000 --> 56:22.000] The judge cannot rule on the motion himself.
[56:22.000 --> 56:27.000] The only thing he can do is voluntarily recuse himself.
[56:27.000 --> 56:41.000] There has to be law similar in Georgia otherwise the motion to recuse or disqualify would be worthless.
[56:41.000 --> 56:48.000] Since it's against the judge, there has to be law that requires another judge to make that ruling.
[56:48.000 --> 56:51.000] You just need to find it.
[56:51.000 --> 56:54.000] You're correct in Georgia.
[56:54.000 --> 56:57.000] It is very similar.
[56:57.000 --> 57:01.000] One of the things that you have to have in Georgia is an affidavit.
[57:01.000 --> 57:12.000] There are a few other things that supposedly are supposed to be done within five days of becoming knowledgeable of the offense.
[57:12.000 --> 57:18.000] The judge is supposed to make a determination at the timeliness.
[57:18.000 --> 57:29.000] If the affidavit is considered denied, but if it's...
[57:29.000 --> 57:32.000] Okay, hold on. You said the judge.
[57:32.000 --> 57:39.000] Are you talking about the judge that you're filing against or another judge?
[57:39.000 --> 57:51.000] Yes, the judge that I'm filing against looks at the motion to disqualify and has a checklist.
[57:51.000 --> 58:01.000] And he goes through that checklist and then if it meets the criteria, then he will forward it to the chief judge.
[58:01.000 --> 58:08.000] And a judge at ransom is...
[58:08.000 --> 58:10.000] Okay, hold on, hold on.
[58:10.000 --> 58:16.000] We've just got a few more seconds before we go to work.
[58:16.000 --> 58:26.000] If he determines that it does not meet the requirements, can he deny it or does he have to notify you of what's failing?
[58:26.000 --> 58:28.000] I don't know.
[58:28.000 --> 58:29.000] Okay, hang on.
[58:29.000 --> 58:30.000] About to go to break.
[58:30.000 --> 58:37.000] Randy Kelton, rule of law radio or call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:37.000 --> 58:38.000] Let's see.
[58:38.000 --> 58:40.000] Call board is full right now.
[58:40.000 --> 58:45.000] So as soon as someone drops off, if you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[58:45.000 --> 58:50.000] We'll be right back.
[59:15.000 --> 59:22.000] We'll be right back.
[59:45.000 --> 59:50.000] Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:19.000] Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:20.000 --> 01:00:27.000] Markets for WZ6 February 2019 open with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:29.000] Silver, $15.77 an ounce.
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:31.000] Copper, $2.83 an ounce.
[01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:34.000] Oil, Texas Crude, $3.66 a barrel.
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:37.000] Brent Crude, $61.98 a barrel.
[01:00:37.000 --> 01:00:39.000] And cryptos in order of market capitalization.
[01:00:39.000 --> 01:00:42.000] Bitcoin, $3,401.64.
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:44.000] Ripple, XRP, 29 cents.
[01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:46.000] Ethereum, $10.10.
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:54.000] And EOS is at $2.32 a crypto coin.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:00:57.000] Take History, the year 1918.
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:02.000] British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property qualifications get the right to vote
[01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:06.000] when the representation of the People Act of 1918 was passed by Parliament.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:09.000] Take History.
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:20.000] In recent news, several Texas-based organizations filed a lawsuit today requesting that a federal court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally registered to vote.
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:33.000] The list was compiled after an 11-month long investigation by the office of the Texas Secretary of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety, which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens who were registered to vote when obtaining major arbitrage license.
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:37.000] Over half of the 95,000 didn't indeed vote, it seems.
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:45.000] However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:50.000] Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:57.000] Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond with proof of eligibility.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:09.000] It's Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:17.000] A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck after a vape pen exploded while he was using it.
[01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:21.000] It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:30.000] The story revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem. The vape store, Smoke and Vape-DZ, has refused to comment.
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:41.000] First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz, interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association Conference,
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:53.000] which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February 14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m. You can find the interview at kiitv.com.
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:03:00.000] This is Rick Rode with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:12.000] It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:21.000] I read his book and it says to cast some authority inside me.
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:33.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, River Radio on this Friday, the third day of May, 2019, and we're talking to Sonny and Georgia.
[01:03:33.000 --> 01:03:45.000] So, if you look at the code, has the judge failed to scrupulously follow the code?
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:04:06.000] The Georgia rules for superior courts on recusal cover this process, and it says that the judge will check to see if it's timely
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:18.000] to make sure there's an affidavit that asserts the facts, has to be no later than five days after the affidavit, first learned of the grounds for disqualification,
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:28.000] and not later than 10 days prior to the next hearing or trial, unless there is good cause showing the failure to meet these requirements.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:47.000] The affidavit has to be specific at the time, place, person, circumstances of the extrajudicial conduct or statements, and allegations of just bare conclusions and opinions aren't legally sufficient.
[01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:59.000] So, when the judge is presented with the motion, he's supposed to temporarily cease from acting on the merits of the matter and immediately determine the timeliness
[01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:12.000] and the legal sufficiency of the affidavit and make a determination, assuming that the facts and the affidavit are true, whether a recusal would be warranted.
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:18.000] And so, if all that is true, then another judge is supposed to be assigned.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:27.000] No, wait, wait, wait. I'm making a correction here. You said the judge must assume that all of that is true.
[01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:39.000] So, you must craft your documents such that if everything is true, it leads to grounds for recusal.
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:47.000] A lot of times we complain about things that even if they're true, it does not require a recusal.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:57.000] So, you need to make sure that your facts support what the court has considered to be grounds for recusal.
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:10.000] Yes, and one of the problems that I have is that they interpret bias differently than I interpret bias.
[01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:20.000] They interpret bias, at least the way it appears to me, as bias or partiality versus impartiality,
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:29.000] meaning that if there's some kind of relationship, whether it's economic or family or something like that,
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:38.000] as opposed to, this guy doesn't like me because I don't have an attorney and I've been called by the law.
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:42.000] Okay, that's consistent with most every state.
[01:06:42.000 --> 01:06:49.000] What you were speaking to the bias, that goes to disqualification.
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:07:04.000] There are certain things that will necessarily disqualify the judge and a family relationship within three degrees of co-singuinity,
[01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:16.000] like a niece, perhaps a great niece would be four degrees, so that wouldn't apply, but a niece would.
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:22.000] So, that would be grounds for disqualification, not for recusal.
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:30.000] Where a judge failed to follow law and denied you due process, that's criminal act against you.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:33.000] That should be grounds for recusal.
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:45.000] Not that he made a rule that you felt was biased, or that in Texas they've ruled that the judge can be biased.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:49.000] That's not grounds for recuse or disqualification.
[01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:55.000] It may be grounds for appeal, but not for disqualification.
[01:07:55.000 --> 01:08:01.000] And when you think about it, it almost has to be that way.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:07.000] Because anytime you get in court and a judge rules against you, you're going to feel like he's biased.
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:12.000] You rules against the other side, they're going to feel like he's biased.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:17.000] Pretty much it goes to perspective, so they won't let you make that claim.
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:22.000] Now, if you can show that the judge had a statutory duty to rule a certain way,
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:30.000] like in your case where he had a statutory duty to rule within a given time frame, that's different.
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:37.000] Then he's committed a crime against you, and the crime is sufficient misconduct, but denial of due process.
[01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:43.000] And when the judge commits crimes against you, that shows sufficient bias to recuse.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:46.000] Does that make sense?
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.000] It does.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:58.000] And so what if the judge were mocking me, calling me a sovereign citizen, even though I keep correcting him and saying,
[01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:06.000] that term's oxymoron, I'm not that, and he just keeps on.
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:13.000] That would appear to show prejudice and animosity.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:16.000] Yeah, but that's not grounds for recusal.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:23.000] That should get a judicial conduct complaint on each one.
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:34.000] Because here again, he's saying things that you might take offense to, and somebody else might not take offense to.
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:39.000] Because we have guys out there that claim to be sovereign citizens.
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:48.000] And so you're asking the courts to say that if a judge says something that you take offense to, then we can throw him off the bench.
[01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:55.000] And they're saying, no, no, no, you don't get to throw out the judge every time he says something you don't like.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:58.000] And to you, that's very offensive.
[01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:00.000] But to somebody else, it may not be.
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:10.000] So the courts have pretty well ruled that we're not going to throw out our judges just because somebody doesn't like what they say.
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:21.000] Unless what they say is clearly threatening, prejudicial, or flat out illegal.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:23.000] There are certain things he can't say.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:27.000] There are certain things he can't call a black person.
[01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:33.000] But that's very clear in the culture.
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:41.000] I'm offended when they call me a sovereign citizen, but it wouldn't be grounds to get a judge refused.
[01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:43.000] Consider the other side.
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:50.000] The bad guys would learn all these tricks and would never be able to finish a case.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:53.000] I see exactly what you're saying.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:11:13.000] One other interesting note is that he's required to the chief judge or the judge hearing the disqualification or considering it shall make written findings and conclusions, which the very first one I filed back before the trial.
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:19.000] I filed a motion for reconsideration and I never heard a peep again from them.
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:28.000] So then did you file a motion for a request for findings, effecting, and conclusions at law?
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:32.000] I have to go back and look.
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:37.000] I mean, it tells them they have to do it in the rules.
[01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:40.000] So it doesn't say that I have to make requests.
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:41.000] Oh, OK.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:47.000] If it says in the rules they have to provide it, then that's better than ours.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:51.000] We have to ask for it and they say if you don't ask for it, you waived it.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:55.000] So in Georgia, they got that handled.
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:11:56.000] They're required to do it.
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:12:01.000] Then you just go ahead and file a criminal against the judge when he doesn't do it.
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:02.000] OK.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:11.000] The way I look at that, that's really serious because now the judge has denied you and your right to appeal because you don't know what to appeal.
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:15.000] You don't know what the ruling was based on.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:39.000] Well, I've had to go through the whole thing with a judge that, I mean, if they follow the rule, then he's not supposed to stop everything that he's doing and deal with this until it's finished.
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:44.000] So every time he doesn't do something he's required to do, file a criminal against him.
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:51.000] That will raise the stakes dramatically.
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:58.000] That's much more dangerous than recusal or disqualification.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:02.000] That can go to court warrant or removal.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:10.000] Now he's not looking at having to explain to an appellate court who's got their snouts in the same trough he's got his in.
[01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:17.000] Now he's looking at the possibility of having to explain it to a grand jury of your peers.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:18.000] Yeah.
[01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:23.000] This gets him nervous.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:45.000] Yeah, the appeal, if it gets to the appeal and I realize that during the trial, I was all befuddled and twisted around and I didn't raise certain objections.
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:56.000] I didn't, you know, bring up the make the proper case for against probable cause or bring up certain parts of the law.
[01:13:56.000 --> 01:14:04.000] If I didn't do that at trial, is there any way to preserve those issues or am I just depends on the nature of the claim.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:11.000] If the claim goes to subject matter jurisdiction, you can bring that at any time.
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:27.000] If there was insufficient probable cause, you can argue that the judge never accrued subject matter jurisdiction because the complaint was insufficient to converge confer jurisdiction on the court.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:34.000] Were you taken to a magistrate who held a preliminary hearing?
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:39.000] No, I was arrested and then I bailed out.
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:43.000] That's jurisdictional issue.
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:48.000] Have you filed a subject matter jurisdiction challenge?
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:50.000] Yes.
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:15:13.000] The main challenge was territorial jurisdictional challenge where I subpoenaed the officer, Deuce's Teacum, to bring the proof that the law applied to me on that land and he didn't show up three times under the subpoena, Deuce's Teacum.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:20.000] And then when he did show up, he didn't bring anything. The judge said, well, it doesn't exist.
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:33.000] And I pointed out to the judge that the best evidence rule requires the written proof because all land has a recorded owner in the courthouse somewhere.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:45.000] And the best evidence rule requires that evidence to trump the officer's testimony that he had jurisdiction.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:49.000] And the judge said on the record that he goofed.
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:53.000] Okay, well, you've got that preserved for appeal.
[01:15:53.000 --> 01:16:04.000] And remember, you're in the trial court. Your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal.
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:08.000] So you want to set every record you can.
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:18.000] If there are other grounds, if the complaint was insufficient on its face, then that won't invoke the court's jurisdiction.
[01:16:18.000 --> 01:16:29.000] The prosecutor, failed to take you directly to the nearest magistrate, he became a trespasser ab initio.
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:32.000] Did you ever receive a preliminary hearing?
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:39.000] I don't believe so. I think in Georgia you have 48 hours to go before a magistrate.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:44.920] that simple. Hang on, we're about to go to break. Our callers are dropping off. Scott,
[01:16:44.920 --> 01:16:50.560] we're going to finish up here shortly. This was an interesting conversation. It's why I kept it
[01:16:50.560 --> 01:16:55.920] going. But Scott, if you'll call back in, we'll take you. Randy Kelton with Law Radio, we'll be right
[01:16:55.920 --> 01:17:05.520] back. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop
[01:17:05.520 --> 01:17:11.360] debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method. Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal
[01:17:11.360 --> 01:17:16.440] court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in
[01:17:16.440 --> 01:17:21.560] plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when
[01:17:21.560 --> 01:17:26.880] contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get
[01:17:26.880 --> 01:17:31.680] debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them
[01:17:31.680 --> 01:17:38.280] pay you to go away? The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.280 --> 01:17:44.200] Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:44.200 --> 01:17:51.400] and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:51.400 --> 01:18:00.960] or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love logos.
[01:18:00.960 --> 01:18:05.560] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the
[01:18:05.560 --> 01:18:11.360] truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fit. I'd be lost without logos and I really
[01:18:11.360 --> 01:18:15.480] want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit
[01:18:15.480 --> 01:18:20.720] of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplement. How can
[01:18:20.720 --> 01:18:26.440] I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you could help
[01:18:26.440 --> 01:18:31.560] logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now,
[01:18:31.560 --> 01:18:39.040] go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything
[01:18:39.040 --> 01:18:45.480] from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do
[01:18:45.480 --> 01:18:52.320] anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes. Wow. Giving without
[01:18:52.320 --> 01:18:58.760] doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are Logos. Happy
[01:18:58.760 --> 01:19:18.720] holidays, Logos. Logos for Logos RadioNetwork. Don't
[01:19:18.720 --> 01:19:45.560] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, we will go to the radio and talk to Sonny and Georgia.
[01:19:45.560 --> 01:19:51.960] I did spend a lot of time here, Sonny, but this was good information and these were some
[01:19:51.960 --> 01:19:58.800] relatively sophisticated issues that everybody needs to understand how to address them and
[01:19:58.800 --> 01:20:09.120] argue them. So the last thing we were talking about was subject matter jurisdiction. And
[01:20:09.120 --> 01:20:16.480] as goes to a preliminary hearing, the feds require a preliminary hearing, nobody does
[01:20:16.480 --> 01:20:24.120] it. And that goes to subject matter jurisdiction, because there never was a determination of
[01:20:24.120 --> 01:20:33.160] probable cause. That has been in law for 800 years. From the time of the signing of the
[01:20:33.160 --> 01:20:42.120] Magna Carta, the requirement to take a person to a magistrate was put in in 1215 AD. And
[01:20:42.120 --> 01:20:49.840] it's carried on through the British law into American law. And it's been in the statutes
[01:20:49.840 --> 01:20:59.960] for this long and it served us well. And around the mid-60s, they stopped doing that. And
[01:20:59.960 --> 01:21:10.400] now we're having issues all over the country with what they call mass incarceration. And
[01:21:10.400 --> 01:21:17.080] these very practices are the cause of that. So we need to get those practices stopped
[01:21:17.080 --> 01:21:20.680] and the only way we're going to get it stopped is to go after them every time they've breached
[01:21:20.680 --> 01:21:29.040] the law. So if they didn't take you to a magistrate and get a determination of probable cause,
[01:21:29.040 --> 01:21:34.800] that's a due process violation. And that's a crime in the state of Georgia and every
[01:21:34.800 --> 01:21:40.200] other state. The public official fails to perform a duty he's required to perform in
[01:21:40.200 --> 01:21:46.000] the process, not as you in a full and free access to or enjoyment of right. That's official
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:53.280] misconduct in Georgia and it's official misconduct in the Fed. Every state has a statute that
[01:21:53.280 --> 01:22:02.720] reflects the Ku Klux Klan Act, 18 U.S. Code 242, which makes that failure to perform a
[01:22:02.720 --> 01:22:09.800] duty of crime. This is right after the Civil War. They left the constables and the sheriffs
[01:22:09.800 --> 01:22:16.440] and the mayors in place so that we had some kind of control and didn't have anarchy and
[01:22:16.440 --> 01:22:23.120] gave them new orders. And they, for the most part, ignored the orders from those Yankee
[01:22:23.120 --> 01:22:29.320] carpet baggers and did what they wanted to. So they passed the Ku Klux Klan Act to give
[01:22:29.320 --> 01:22:36.120] the individual recourse to go after anyone who violated those rights. But the first part
[01:22:36.120 --> 01:22:43.160] of the Ku Klux Klan Act, the second part, has been codified into 42 U.S. Code 1983. And
[01:22:43.160 --> 01:22:51.240] that's the code that allows you to sue public officials. But that's the second part. First
[01:22:51.240 --> 01:23:00.200] part, 18 U.S. Code 242 makes it a criminal act. So we should take the lead from the legislature.
[01:23:00.200 --> 01:23:11.360] Go criminal first. Criminal will set you up for the civil because these guys, when you
[01:23:11.360 --> 01:23:17.040] start filing criminally, they will commit crimes in order to shield one another from
[01:23:17.040 --> 01:23:25.200] prosecution. It creates a bigger civil mess for them. Every time they fail to do what
[01:23:25.200 --> 01:23:32.040] they're required to do, then you get to sue them for that. Okay, Sonny, I do really need
[01:23:32.040 --> 01:23:37.920] to move along. We've spent a long time on this. But is anything else you have?
[01:23:37.920 --> 01:23:45.480] Well, I think for me to pursue civilly, like for false arrests or something like that,
[01:23:45.480 --> 01:23:52.800] I think that this has to be overturned. This judgment has to be avoided. And one interesting
[01:23:52.800 --> 01:24:01.440] thing about in Georgia, there's not a motion to void a ruling. You have to attack it through
[01:24:01.440 --> 01:24:11.240] direct appeal. And so they want to charge me these fees $750 to file to get the remedy
[01:24:11.240 --> 01:24:22.200] by statute where the DA by statute doesn't have to pay the clerk for any kind of appellate
[01:24:22.200 --> 01:24:31.040] filing fee. Well, that's because the DA, he is just a lawyer for the state. The criminal
[01:24:31.040 --> 01:24:38.040] case is instituted by the state, and they hire the district attorney to represent the
[01:24:38.040 --> 01:24:44.800] state in the case. So it'd be inappropriate to have the state pay the state itself for
[01:24:44.800 --> 01:24:53.800] initiating a case. Does that make sense? It's like state taking it out of one pocket
[01:24:53.800 --> 01:25:04.480] putting it in another. So no, he doesn't have to pay. But you do have a right to counsel
[01:25:04.480 --> 01:25:11.080] whether you can afford it or not. And if you refuse to accept that, you know, you take
[01:25:11.080 --> 01:25:19.040] this to the court to the appeals, generally the appeals court wants you to have your remedy.
[01:25:19.040 --> 01:25:25.680] So you can appeal the decision to the court of appeals. And you don't have to file to
[01:25:25.680 --> 01:25:35.000] do that appeal. You file the appeal with a motion for inability to pay with the court
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:45.360] of appeals. Interesting. So go straight to the court of appeals and then if they approve
[01:25:45.360 --> 01:25:53.200] that, then I wouldn't have to pay the court. Right. They have to have constitutional remedy.
[01:25:53.200 --> 01:26:01.280] And this would be your constitutional remedy. If the court, if the court knows you can't
[01:26:01.280 --> 01:26:09.440] afford it, they don't care. Then they would deny you access to justice. So your remedy
[01:26:09.440 --> 01:26:21.800] is an appeal to the court of appeals and file the same motion with them. And your payment
[01:26:21.800 --> 01:26:27.920] for the appeal is to the court of appeals, not to the trial court.
[01:26:27.920 --> 01:26:38.640] Okay. Well, Randy, thank you so much for taking time with me and look forward to hearing
[01:26:38.640 --> 01:26:43.920] some of the other callers have to say. Okay. Thank you, Sonny. Now we're going to go to
[01:26:43.920 --> 01:26:54.560] Barrios. Did I pronounce that right? Barrios? No, that's not right, Randy. So is it Barrios?
[01:26:54.560 --> 01:27:05.280] No, no, no. I was trying to roll the R. I'm Frank. You're French. No, I'm Frank. That's
[01:27:05.280 --> 01:27:12.720] my name. Frank, you know me. Well, why is your name coming up Barrios? Because the Boost
[01:27:12.720 --> 01:27:18.600] Mobile Company has that listed as my name. So I leave it like that. Okay. I'm going to
[01:27:18.600 --> 01:27:26.160] call you Barrios. Wait, which Frank are you? Frank from the slums of Chicago? No, from
[01:27:26.160 --> 01:27:34.760] New York. You know, the guy that pulled the paper holder thing. Oh, okay, okay. I got
[01:27:34.760 --> 01:27:40.560] more than one Frank. Okay. That one went really well. I love that was great. Even though
[01:27:40.560 --> 01:27:47.400] I did spend a couple of hours in jail, I got cops on the run. They wouldn't come near me
[01:27:47.400 --> 01:28:00.400] after that. Good. Okay. What do you have for us today? I ordered the traffic seminar and
[01:28:00.400 --> 01:28:05.680] I think I think it was the second or I think it was the second and I emailed that to you.
[01:28:05.680 --> 01:28:14.880] Is that sufficient? Wait, say that again? I ordered the traffic seminar. Oh, oh, yeah.
[01:28:14.880 --> 01:28:23.760] That's from Eddie the Chump Craig. Yeah, you guys are quite for some reason. Now we just
[01:28:23.760 --> 01:28:28.960] pick on each other. We reserve the right to abuse one another. He loves you on his dough
[01:28:28.960 --> 01:28:37.120] saying something nice about Eddie. It would just ruin all the fun. I love all you. I hope
[01:28:37.120 --> 01:28:43.280] you guys don't even get scared because you ain't got no money because God, God provides
[01:28:43.280 --> 01:28:50.560] if you really just open your arms and shovel the money into your pocket. That would be nice
[01:28:50.560 --> 01:29:01.120] if we had enough that we needed a shovel, but we have other motivations. If our motivation
[01:29:01.120 --> 01:29:08.840] was making a lot of money, we would be doing something else. I know. Well, I've been doing
[01:29:08.840 --> 01:29:16.240] this and God's been providing. So thank God, even though I got hit by a car and got my
[01:29:16.240 --> 01:29:24.640] neck broke and whatever, all kinds of stuff happened to me and I'm still shooting. I'm
[01:29:24.640 --> 01:29:33.520] still moving. Anyways, I have no cases, but I just ordered the traffic seminar. I was
[01:29:33.520 --> 01:29:37.920] wondering what's the average time it takes to get mailed out? Oh, generally, just to
[01:29:37.920 --> 01:29:46.600] dare to. Deborah will probably have that out in the mail tomorrow. Oh, awesome. Anyways,
[01:29:46.600 --> 01:29:51.840] I was wondering if... Okay, wait, wait. Hang on. About to go to break. Randy Keltman,
[01:29:51.840 --> 01:30:05.360] we have a lot of radio. We'll be right back. This performance enhancing drug shows up on
[01:30:05.360 --> 01:30:10.560] drug tests, but it hasn't been banned from professional sports. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht
[01:30:10.560 --> 01:30:15.680] and I'll bet you are taking this drug too. I'll be back to tell you what it is. Privacy
[01:30:15.680 --> 01:30:20.840] is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.840 --> 01:30:25.640] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So
[01:30:25.640 --> 01:30:31.240] protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:31.240 --> 01:30:36.960] it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:36.960 --> 01:30:43.440] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:43.440 --> 01:30:50.520] Caffeine, can it make you a better athlete? The verdict is as muddy as a cup of Joe. Researchers
[01:30:50.520 --> 01:30:55.320] studying cyclist, runners, and rowers found caffeine does boost performance for short-term
[01:30:55.320 --> 01:30:59.760] power events. Tennis players' accuracy and speed improved and they had more endurance
[01:30:59.760 --> 01:31:04.280] to get through the match. The caffeine doesn't help in all sports and the correct dose varies
[01:31:04.280 --> 01:31:10.040] widely between individuals. Caffeine contributes to dehydration. Plus it can give you the jitters
[01:31:10.040 --> 01:31:14.560] and nervousness is the last thing you want in a competition. Athletes quickly build up
[01:31:14.560 --> 01:31:19.400] a tolerance to caffeine and it's addictive, as anyone who's ever had a caffeine headache
[01:31:19.400 --> 01:31:30.840] can tell you. Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.840 --> 01:31:36.200] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.200 --> 01:31:41.640] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:31:41.640 --> 01:31:45.560] it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their
[01:31:45.560 --> 01:31:50.320] lives and thousands of my fellow first responders have died. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm
[01:31:50.320 --> 01:31:53.560] a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.560 --> 01:32:00.160] I'm a father who lost his son. We are Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org
[01:32:00.160 --> 01:32:04.120] today. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule
[01:32:04.120 --> 01:32:07.960] of Law traffic similar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society and if
[01:32:07.960 --> 01:32:11.240] we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand
[01:32:11.240 --> 01:32:15.640] and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place-to-place,
[01:32:15.640 --> 01:32:19.280] the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly, the right to due process
[01:32:19.280 --> 01:32:23.520] of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce
[01:32:23.520 --> 01:32:27.800] and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction
[01:32:27.800 --> 01:32:31.200] with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.200 --> 01:32:35.560] that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.560 --> 01:32:39.560] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:39.560 --> 01:32:43.240] ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas
[01:32:43.240 --> 01:32:47.920] Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:47.920 --> 01:32:51.560] Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for
[01:32:51.560 --> 01:32:55.640] your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today
[01:32:55.640 --> 01:33:03.120] and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:03.120 --> 01:33:32.120] Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:32.120 --> 01:33:36.120] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Rule of Law Radio and we're talking to Frank in
[01:33:36.120 --> 01:33:39.120] New York. Okay, go ahead, Frank.
[01:33:39.120 --> 01:33:43.120] I'm in Austin right now. I've been in Austin for years now.
[01:33:43.120 --> 01:33:44.120] Oh!
[01:33:44.120 --> 01:33:52.920] Yeah, I came down here just to be close to Eddie and you because I decided to just do
[01:33:52.920 --> 01:34:04.240] this is the rest of my life. Anyways, I got run off the road by an automobile going to
[01:34:04.240 --> 01:34:12.360] lunch. He was so hungry. I was on a bicycle on the bike lane and he pulled alongside of
[01:34:12.360 --> 01:34:19.960] me and I had my light splashing and everything. He just forced me off the road and I have
[01:34:19.960 --> 01:34:25.600] a little dog and I keep in my little trailer and stuff. Everybody was okay. But I walked
[01:34:25.600 --> 01:34:31.160] up to him and I said nicely and politely, of course, Texas, you don't mess with Texas,
[01:34:31.160 --> 01:34:37.080] right? So I asked him, do you know he just almost ran me over? He said, I don't care.
[01:34:37.080 --> 01:34:41.440] Well, of course he was hungry or something. But I said, you know, that might be an opportunity
[01:34:41.440 --> 01:34:52.280] to test the system. Maybe mail some, go to the district attorney's office or whatever,
[01:34:52.280 --> 01:35:01.920] have him throw it in the trash or whatever and then take charges against him to the grant.
[01:35:01.920 --> 01:35:07.920] Yeah, okay. Best fight to have is the fight you picked.
[01:35:07.920 --> 01:35:15.000] Right. Right. And I don't feel guilty because I know there's a lot of shenanigans. I asked
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:24.040] the policeman who was on the scene there with another Metro bus incident, some type of
[01:35:24.040 --> 01:35:29.680] thing happened. There was like five police there. So I picked the mildest looking one
[01:35:29.680 --> 01:35:35.240] and I went up to him and I asked him what I should do. And he said, well, that's class
[01:35:35.240 --> 01:35:39.760] C misdemeanor. I says, well, the guy told me that he didn't care. What would that be?
[01:35:39.760 --> 01:35:43.760] No, assault with a motor vehicle is not a class C misdemeanor.
[01:35:43.760 --> 01:35:51.600] Right. So I said, you know, this is why I'm going to run down the road with no plates
[01:35:51.600 --> 01:35:56.600] on my car and have you arrest me because you guys are not been trained properly. And I'm
[01:35:56.600 --> 01:36:01.800] not going after you. I want to go after who trained you. I told him that. And I said,
[01:36:01.800 --> 01:36:06.720] have a nice day. Thank you very much. After he handed me this pamphlet about class C misdemeanors
[01:36:06.720 --> 01:36:11.120] and whatever it is, they were very nice. I mean, they're just not trained.
[01:36:11.120 --> 01:36:15.280] Yeah. And that's true. The policemen are trained the way they're trained, but they're not
[01:36:15.280 --> 01:36:16.280] the problem.
[01:36:16.280 --> 01:36:17.280] Right.
[01:36:17.280 --> 01:36:24.600] They're kind of the point of the spear. And, you know, I could not be a policeman. I would
[01:36:24.600 --> 01:36:30.520] not have the patience and the tolerance to put up with all the garbage they have to put
[01:36:30.520 --> 01:36:32.000] up with.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:34.800] I know I have a lot of bomb at the people, though.
[01:36:34.800 --> 01:36:40.880] Yeah. So, so I tell people, don't ever fight with the police out there on the street. If
[01:36:40.880 --> 01:36:46.400] the police do something wrong, take the fight somewhere else. I was here in Tennessee and
[01:36:46.400 --> 01:36:52.880] I was going to go into courtroom and I had a captain that developed a dislike for me for
[01:36:52.880 --> 01:37:00.000] some reason. And he was accusing me of just because I filed criminal charges against one
[01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:03.480] of the bailiffs because he wouldn't let me in the courtroom, wouldn't let me video the
[01:37:03.480 --> 01:37:11.680] courtroom. He said that I told the bailiff that I said that about the bailiff I filed
[01:37:11.680 --> 01:37:15.800] criminal charges against. He said that bailiff said that I hated him.
[01:37:15.800 --> 01:37:23.520] It's hard, isn't it? He was great. He was a consummate professional. He was polite. He
[01:37:23.520 --> 01:37:28.080] was everything I wanted a policeman to be. He wasn't a jackbooty thug like you are.
[01:37:28.080 --> 01:37:29.080] Right.
[01:37:29.080 --> 01:37:34.560] Well, he seemed to take offense to that. And he tried to give me an argument so I just
[01:37:34.560 --> 01:37:38.280] turned away from him and walked toward the courtroom door and he reached up and grabbed
[01:37:38.280 --> 01:37:46.080] me by both arms from behind. But he grabbed me lightly so I could have pulled loose if
[01:37:46.080 --> 01:37:53.120] I wanted to. And it was clear that's what he wanted me to do. And then he turned me
[01:37:53.120 --> 01:37:58.840] around and pushed me in the other direction. So what do you do in that case?
[01:37:58.840 --> 01:38:01.160] Are you good at combat?
[01:38:01.160 --> 01:38:08.160] I said, you touched me. Well, you're not going in that courtroom. I understand that, but
[01:38:08.160 --> 01:38:17.640] you touched me. And that's all I said to him. I went down. I didn't have had to leave my
[01:38:17.640 --> 01:38:22.080] phone in the car because I knew they wouldn't let me in with the phone. I got my phone.
[01:38:22.080 --> 01:38:29.160] I called 911. In about an hour and a half, the high sheriff of the county showed up and
[01:38:29.160 --> 01:38:37.520] I wanted him to arrest his police officer, his captain. And he was very professional
[01:38:37.520 --> 01:38:45.000] and very, very careful with me. And I liked that part. He handled me very well. He finally
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:52.640] asked me, Mr. Kelton, what do you want me to do? I said, I want you to take my criminal
[01:38:52.640 --> 01:39:03.360] complaint of aggravated assault against officer Captain McDade, or I want you to refer me
[01:39:03.360 --> 01:39:11.560] to someone else. He said, well, I can do that. I'll refer you to the prosecuting attorney.
[01:39:11.560 --> 01:39:17.160] That's all I needed. But when I go to the prosecuting attorney, I'm going to file against
[01:39:17.160 --> 01:39:32.160] the sheriff. But instead of that, I came back later that day. The court was hearing at the
[01:39:32.160 --> 01:39:38.560] jail where they're doing these cattle calls. I went to that and I had made up some complaints
[01:39:38.560 --> 01:39:48.640] against McDade and filed those with a magistrate. And this guy was really a good judge, but
[01:39:48.640 --> 01:39:57.520] he didn't hold an examining trial. So I'll file against the judge accusing him of shielding
[01:39:57.520 --> 01:40:05.400] McDade from prosecution that didn't take anything up with McDade. When he did that, I got the
[01:40:05.400 --> 01:40:11.960] heck out of there. One thing I didn't want it to escalate. And the other, I wanted it
[01:40:11.960 --> 01:40:19.280] to be his action to be accomplished. I didn't want them to say, well, as soon as the court
[01:40:19.280 --> 01:40:26.200] goes into a recess, then you can go in. I didn't want him to get a chance to back up
[01:40:26.200 --> 01:40:31.480] at all. So I got the heck out of there. When somebody screws up, you want to nail them
[01:40:31.480 --> 01:40:36.240] on it. He said I couldn't go in the courtroom, so I got the heck out of there. So that's
[01:40:36.240 --> 01:40:40.480] a done deal. It's not fixable. But never argue with the police.
[01:40:40.480 --> 01:40:41.480] Oh, no.
[01:40:41.480 --> 01:40:42.480] Yeah, at the point.
[01:40:42.480 --> 01:40:46.480] He's still hurt. He scared the crap out of him.
[01:40:46.480 --> 01:40:53.480] Yeah, because the way they're trained right now, you put in your life at risk.
[01:40:53.480 --> 01:41:02.960] Oh, yeah. In New York, when I was younger, I was really good at combat. Nobody could
[01:41:02.960 --> 01:41:08.800] beat me. I was really fast, lightning fast. And I would go up against some really heavy
[01:41:08.800 --> 01:41:16.840] hitters in the competition. And I'm always looking. 50 moves down the road. If I wanted
[01:41:16.840 --> 01:41:20.640] to, I could have that man's weapon. I could have anything he wants. I could take his eyeballs
[01:41:20.640 --> 01:41:25.160] out if I wanted to, but I don't do it. Because it was constant.
[01:41:25.160 --> 01:41:30.280] Yeah, well, you're outgunned here. Oh, yeah.
[01:41:30.280 --> 01:41:35.480] And it's just not a good strategy. Just a better strategy. Set him up. Now, when I
[01:41:35.480 --> 01:41:43.800] go back to the courthouse the next time, everybody's going to give me a wide burst. Nobody's
[01:41:43.800 --> 01:41:45.720] going to want to deal with me.
[01:41:45.720 --> 01:41:49.760] Right. That's what I'm going to do. I'm going to, I'm going to set him up. Well, I want
[01:41:49.760 --> 01:41:55.360] to make, I want to make some noise. I've never been arrested in Texas ever. Never for anything,
[01:41:55.360 --> 01:42:00.920] not even spitting on a sidewalk. Nothing. I'm a very, I know Texas. You don't mess
[01:42:00.920 --> 01:42:01.920] with Texas.
[01:42:01.920 --> 01:42:12.240] Well, I've only, I've only had three ribs dislocated, two collar bones broken, a broken
[01:42:12.240 --> 01:42:15.840] elbow and a tooth knocked out. That's all.
[01:42:15.840 --> 01:42:23.320] I've had, I've had landlords come after me when I was a young kid, working on oil rigged
[01:42:23.320 --> 01:42:31.160] out in West Texas, pulling knives on me. You know, you don't mess with nobody around
[01:42:31.160 --> 01:42:35.480] here. I don't, I don't mess with even the bones that got done.
[01:42:35.480 --> 01:42:42.920] Yeah, I had an ex, a guy I purchased a house from and he had bought, he had sold his house
[01:42:42.920 --> 01:42:48.560] four or five times and always taking it back. And he couldn't get it back for me. And he
[01:42:48.560 --> 01:42:52.520] come over one day when they were starting to issue. I'm trying to get rid of him. He
[01:42:52.520 --> 01:42:58.560] reaches in his pocket and pulled out this big jack knife and he's trying to open it.
[01:42:58.560 --> 01:43:03.000] And I turned and rocked back on my right foot. Cause when that blade come open, I was going
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:10.800] to dot his eye and he realized what I was doing. He put his knife away and left.
[01:43:10.800 --> 01:43:22.040] Yeah. I was fixing to knock him out. Yeah. If you're good at it, if you're not, you better
[01:43:22.040 --> 01:43:26.240] have some sneakers on. Yeah. Well, in this case, I was on my own property
[01:43:26.240 --> 01:43:33.080] and I had no duty to withdraw. Right. Right. And I didn't want him sticking anybody because
[01:43:33.080 --> 01:43:37.840] I didn't want him spending the rest of his life in jail just cause he's been ignorant.
[01:43:37.840 --> 01:43:42.680] I would have knocked him out if I had to, but not unless I had to. He decided to put
[01:43:42.680 --> 01:43:48.360] it away and everything was fine. Anyway, not a place I like to go.
[01:43:48.360 --> 01:43:54.000] Right. As the break comes up though, I'm going to take a bite and I'll call in with some
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:44:00.720] problems that I got. Okay. So go out and start some trouble and then call in.
[01:44:00.720 --> 01:44:06.760] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.760 --> 01:44:11.520] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.520 --> 01:44:17.160] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.160 --> 01:44:22.560] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[01:44:22.560 --> 01:44:28.120] Jeviti can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to
[01:44:28.120 --> 01:44:33.720] endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jeviti so
[01:44:33.720 --> 01:44:40.240] much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.240 --> 01:44:46.200] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:46.200 --> 01:44:53.280] quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Jeviti, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[01:44:53.280 --> 01:44:59.360] you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:59.360 --> 01:45:07.680] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.680 --> 01:45:14.680] The affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.680 --> 01:45:21.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:45:21.000 --> 01:45:26.360] know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and
[01:45:26.360 --> 01:45:32.840] now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[01:45:32.840 --> 01:45:38.280] winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[01:45:38.280 --> 01:45:44.040] understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[01:45:44.040 --> 01:45:51.400] our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and
[01:45:51.400 --> 01:46:00.880] much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner. Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:00.880 --> 01:46:25.880] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton in the ruleoflaw radio. And we're going to Danny in Tennessee.
[01:46:25.880 --> 01:46:36.880] Hello? Hello. What do you have for us today? You want to talk about that document you sent
[01:46:36.880 --> 01:46:44.880] me? Well, we can do that a bit, but I'm not as prepared for that as I might want to be.
[01:46:44.880 --> 01:46:50.880] Have you read it pretty well? Well, I read the first part of it, and this was some kind
[01:46:50.880 --> 01:47:06.600] of court filing that purported to lay down the process on arrest. And it quoted 543.006
[01:47:06.600 --> 01:47:15.520] that required the arresting officer to take you for a magistrate, and then it quoted 15.17
[01:47:15.520 --> 01:47:23.240] that required him to read you your rights. Well, whoever did that didn't read the code.
[01:47:23.240 --> 01:47:31.280] Chapter 15 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure goes to arrest on an existing warrant. And
[01:47:31.280 --> 01:47:38.720] that section on reading you your rights, that only applies if you are arrested on an existing
[01:47:38.720 --> 01:47:46.280] warrant out of county. Then they read you your rights. Well, when you're brought into
[01:47:46.280 --> 01:47:51.320] the county, you'll be taken before a magistrate and given an examining trial. If you are arrested
[01:47:51.320 --> 01:47:56.520] without a warrant, you are to go before a magistrate, and the magistrate is to hold an
[01:47:56.520 --> 01:48:08.560] examining trial under Chapter 16 issued an order under 16.17. Absent that 16.17 order
[01:48:08.560 --> 01:48:14.480] issued within 48 hours of your arrest, you have a right to dismissal, says that right
[01:48:14.480 --> 01:48:23.480] there in the code. So that particular document looked like it was written by a prosecutor.
[01:48:23.480 --> 01:48:28.720] They were telling you how they actually did things and not with a law set. Anyway, what
[01:48:28.720 --> 01:48:36.920] did you have for us today, Danny? Oh, well, just some things about trying to put in some
[01:48:36.920 --> 01:48:44.360] criminal complaints and getting some interference in it. Oh, we love interference. I'm running
[01:48:44.360 --> 01:48:54.440] that routine up here. Folks, I'm about 60 miles north of where Danny is in Tennessee.
[01:48:54.440 --> 01:49:04.640] And I tell you, what I'm doing here could not have went any better. The only one who
[01:49:04.640 --> 01:49:13.960] kind of screwed things up was the captain. And it was perfect because it was the captain.
[01:49:13.960 --> 01:49:21.800] The only one I brought complaints against that were ugly is the captain. The only one
[01:49:21.800 --> 01:49:32.160] I complained about doing something really adolescence and stupid was the captain. And
[01:49:32.160 --> 01:49:40.800] the first bailiff who was very professional, very polite, when I next talked to him, I'm
[01:49:40.800 --> 01:49:48.040] going to tell him that I owe him an explanation. I don't owe him an apology because I filed
[01:49:48.040 --> 01:49:55.120] criminal charges against him. I filed criminal charges against him so that I would get the
[01:49:55.120 --> 01:50:05.080] opportunity to tell the high sheriff of the county and the local judge how professional
[01:50:05.080 --> 01:50:11.920] I thought this officer was. And that's exactly what I did and told him that's why I filed
[01:50:11.920 --> 01:50:18.040] these charges against him because nobody's going to say that I filed against this officer
[01:50:18.040 --> 01:50:28.240] because I was in any way upset or angry with him at all because I liked him. And if I need
[01:50:28.240 --> 01:50:34.080] someone with a pistol, I want you to send this guy. I wanted my complaints to be clean
[01:50:34.080 --> 01:50:40.480] and then Mr. Jack Boot McDade wants to try to manhandle me while I have a pistol on.
[01:50:40.480 --> 01:50:46.280] Now that's an ugly complaint. I don't like it. And this is what I told the judge. I would
[01:50:46.280 --> 01:50:53.440] much rather not be here in front of you with this particular complaint. But I don't get
[01:50:53.440 --> 01:51:01.240] to pick and choose. Officer McDade put his hands on me while he was prominently displaying
[01:51:01.240 --> 01:51:10.360] a deadly weapon in order to prevent me from exercising the right. This is how I read the
[01:51:10.360 --> 01:51:19.040] code and this is a duty that I have. So I get the opportunity to really hammer the captain
[01:51:19.040 --> 01:51:27.240] who has an attitude and has no business with a pistol. And I also get the opportunity to
[01:51:27.240 --> 01:51:33.720] big up the officer who conducted himself like he should have. So this worked out really
[01:51:33.720 --> 01:51:43.840] well so far. And now they got the routine down. Tomorrow I will go to the county mayor
[01:51:43.840 --> 01:51:50.200] here in Tennessee. They don't have a county commissioners court like they do in most states.
[01:51:50.200 --> 01:51:57.960] They have a county mayor. And I'll go to him with an information request. I want to see
[01:51:57.960 --> 01:52:05.920] the bonding. All the information about their bonding for all of these officers. And I will
[01:52:05.920 --> 01:52:14.520] name I think six so far. I already know they each have a 70. They're statutorily required
[01:52:14.520 --> 01:52:29.720] to have a $75,000 bond. And I got six maybe more. I've got three, four, five, six officers.
[01:52:29.720 --> 01:52:39.560] And I got eight, nine. I got the judge, district attorney, and a district attorney's investigator.
[01:52:39.560 --> 01:52:48.160] So I got nine at $75,000 a piece. So what the mayor is going to come away with is he's
[01:52:48.160 --> 01:52:53.960] going to tell everybody, hey guys, this guy is just setting you up so he can sue you for
[01:52:53.960 --> 01:53:06.280] your bond. What do you think they're going to think then? Danny, if you were a policeman,
[01:53:06.280 --> 01:53:13.080] if you're a sheriff or a judge, you got somebody coming in here getting your officers to follow
[01:53:13.080 --> 01:53:20.600] policy so he could sue him against, sue against their bond rate. How do you deal with that
[01:53:20.600 --> 01:53:33.000] guy? Try to find something they can't deal with. They can't fight. Everything they do
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:42.280] makes you worse. It's what they do to us. You go to court and they pull this kind of
[01:53:42.280 --> 01:53:47.960] nonsense on you all the time. It's time we start doing it back. Did you hear the show
[01:53:47.960 --> 01:53:56.840] last night, Danny? Yeah, most of it anyway. Where Brett was talking about the request
[01:53:56.840 --> 01:54:03.960] he sent for their insurance and bonding information. I'm getting that from Brett. I think he's
[01:54:03.960 --> 01:54:09.400] already sent it to me. I didn't get through it today. And I will build that up as an information
[01:54:09.400 --> 01:54:17.280] request and take it down to the county mayor tomorrow. That ought to really get him hopping
[01:54:17.280 --> 01:54:22.680] up and down. And I'll make up criminal charges against this really nice judge. I really like
[01:54:22.680 --> 01:54:30.800] this judge. But I'm going to file a criminal against him anyway. Because I liked it. I
[01:54:30.800 --> 01:54:38.160] also liked the sheriff. The sheriff was a consummate professional. He was trying to get angry when
[01:54:38.160 --> 01:54:45.920] I requested a docket for this hearing that was coming up from a sergeant. And the sheriff
[01:54:45.920 --> 01:54:53.040] come out and told me that the sheriff's department didn't have that, that the judge, the court
[01:54:53.040 --> 01:55:00.160] had it. So I'd have to ask for it from them. And I can hear the anger building in his voice.
[01:55:00.160 --> 01:55:06.080] And he started to walk away. And I said, this is one thing, Sheriff. You know, I've been
[01:55:06.080 --> 01:55:12.480] talking around the county about you. And I've heard a lot about you. But you have. So you
[01:55:12.480 --> 01:55:19.120] have. And all of it good. What the heck is that? And he said, well, you know, you just
[01:55:19.120 --> 01:55:27.960] can't believe everything you hear. So I kind of it disarmed him. And from then on, he was
[01:55:27.960 --> 01:55:35.880] he was really professional. The judge, one of the first people they brought up in front
[01:55:35.880 --> 01:55:42.480] of him was a woman, an older woman. And he called her by name. He said, we've been trying
[01:55:42.480 --> 01:55:49.200] to collect one speeding ticket from you for seven years. So how long have you been in
[01:55:49.200 --> 01:55:55.320] jail this time? It's like 12 or 13 days. And how many times have you been in our jail?
[01:55:55.320 --> 01:56:02.240] I don't know four or five. He said, we are obviously not going to be able to collect
[01:56:02.240 --> 01:56:11.400] this money from you. So I'm going to convert this to a civil debt. You will never have
[01:56:11.400 --> 01:56:17.280] to worry about being arrested over this debt again. Danny, have you ever heard of anything
[01:56:17.280 --> 01:56:18.280] like that?
[01:56:18.280 --> 01:56:19.280] No.
[01:56:19.280 --> 01:56:28.800] That was I was astounded. And after I proceeded the complaints against these officers and
[01:56:28.800 --> 01:56:37.880] he refused to act on them. We were talking a little after that. And he said, I've mentioned
[01:56:37.880 --> 01:56:46.680] about the way he dropped all of these failure to appear fines and such. And he said, I just
[01:56:46.680 --> 01:56:54.160] don't have it in me to be a debt collector for the state.
[01:56:54.160 --> 01:57:04.680] I was astounded. I hope we have a lot more judges with that mentality. So he was really
[01:57:04.680 --> 01:57:13.080] the perfect one for me to file criminal charges against specifically for following policy.
[01:57:13.080 --> 01:57:26.320] So anyway, I kind of bushwhacked you and led you astray. Where did you want to go? Are
[01:57:26.320 --> 01:57:42.560] you there, Danny? I think I put him to sleep. Danny, if you can hear me, we can hear you.
[01:57:42.560 --> 01:57:51.960] So if you will call back in, I will bring you up. We've got John in New York. John,
[01:57:51.960 --> 01:57:55.240] you have all of 55 seconds.
[01:57:55.240 --> 01:58:00.240] Oh, I should be able to take care of that. Fine. How are you?
[01:58:00.240 --> 01:58:07.840] I'm good. Okay. Hang on. We will pick you up on the other side. Everybody knows you're
[01:58:07.840 --> 01:58:14.560] a little long-winded for 50 seconds. This is Randy Calcutt and we have a lot of radio.
[01:58:14.560 --> 01:58:22.280] I call it number 512-646-1984. We do have an empty place on the board. So if you have
[01:58:22.280 --> 01:58:27.080] a question or comment, give us a call. We'll be taking your calls all night and I'll try
[01:58:27.080 --> 01:58:32.000] to make sure I get to everybody. Oh, it looks like Danny called in. So you're trumped when
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:50.440] we come back, John, until we finish with Danny. Okay. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:58:50.440 --> 01:58:55.840] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.840 --> 01:59:01.080] because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying
[01:59:01.080 --> 01:59:07.560] the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. Enter
[01:59:07.560 --> 01:59:13.760] the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the
[01:59:13.760 --> 01:59:20.100] real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages
[01:59:20.100 --> 01:59:25.520] are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond
[01:59:25.520 --> 01:59:31.280] which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free
[01:59:31.280 --> 01:59:36.720] recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[01:59:36.720 --> 01:59:47.720] just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.720 --> 01:59:56.160] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadionetwork.com.