ROL_2019-03-22_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000] The falling of these flashes brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown
[00:05.000 --> 00:08.000] Providing your jelly bulletins for the commodities market
[00:08.000 --> 00:10.000] Today in history
[00:10.000 --> 00:12.000] News updates
[00:12.000 --> 00:16.000] And the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative
[00:21.000 --> 00:24.000] Markets for Wazeva 6th of February 2019
[00:24.000 --> 00:27.000] Open with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce
[00:27.000 --> 00:29.000] Silver, $15.77 an ounce
[00:29.000 --> 00:31.000] Copper, $2.83 an ounce
[00:31.000 --> 00:34.000] Oil, Texas Crude, $3.66 a barrel
[00:34.000 --> 00:37.000] Brand Crude, $61.98 a barrel
[00:37.000 --> 00:39.000] And cryptos in order of market capitalization
[00:39.000 --> 00:42.000] Bitcoin, $3,401.64
[00:42.000 --> 00:45.000] Ripple, XRP, $0.29
[00:45.000 --> 00:47.000] Ethereum, $10.10
[00:47.000 --> 00:50.000] And Eos is at $2.32 a crypto coin
[00:50.000 --> 00:54.000] History
[00:54.000 --> 00:56.000] The year 1918
[00:56.000 --> 00:58.000] British women over the age of 30
[00:58.000 --> 01:00.000] who meet minimum property qualifications
[01:00.000 --> 01:02.000] get the right to vote
[01:02.000 --> 01:04.000] when the Representation of the People Act of 1918
[01:04.000 --> 01:06.000] was passed by Parliament
[01:06.000 --> 01:08.000] Today in history
[01:08.000 --> 01:10.000] In recent news
[01:10.000 --> 01:12.000] several Texas-based organizations
[01:12.000 --> 01:14.000] found a lawsuit today requesting that a federal court
[01:14.000 --> 01:17.000] stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people
[01:17.000 --> 01:19.000] as potentially illegally registered to vote
[01:19.000 --> 01:22.000] The list was compiled after an 11 month long investigation
[01:22.000 --> 01:25.000] by the Office of the Texas Secretary of State
[01:25.000 --> 01:27.000] and the Texas Department of Public Safety
[01:27.000 --> 01:29.000] which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens
[01:29.000 --> 01:31.000] who were registered to vote
[01:31.000 --> 01:33.000] when obtaining H.R. license
[01:33.000 --> 01:35.000] Over half of the 95,000
[01:35.000 --> 01:37.000] did indeed vote it seems
[01:37.000 --> 01:39.000] However, further controversy was raised
[01:39.000 --> 01:41.000] when it became clear that some of the names
[01:41.000 --> 01:43.000] were not in fact belonging to those
[01:43.000 --> 01:45.000] who were non-citizens and registered
[01:45.000 --> 01:48.000] Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants
[01:48.000 --> 01:50.000] become naturalized, gaining the right to vote
[01:50.000 --> 01:52.000] Registered voters who receive letters
[01:52.000 --> 01:54.000] querying their citizenship
[01:54.000 --> 01:56.000] have 30 days to respond with proof of eligibility
[01:56.000 --> 01:58.000] Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
[01:58.000 --> 02:01.000] and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State
[02:01.000 --> 02:04.000] have yet to officially comment regarding this list
[02:04.000 --> 02:06.000] and any updates pertaining to it
[02:09.000 --> 02:11.000] A Texas man of only 24 years old
[02:11.000 --> 02:13.000] William Brown died from a severed artery
[02:13.000 --> 02:15.000] in his neck after a vape pen exploded
[02:15.000 --> 02:17.000] while he was using it
[02:17.000 --> 02:19.000] and apparently happened in the parking lot
[02:19.000 --> 02:21.000] of the vape shop where he got it
[02:21.000 --> 02:23.000] An X-ray revealed that a piece of metal
[02:23.000 --> 02:25.000] was embedded in his brainstem
[02:25.000 --> 02:27.000] The vape store, Smoke and Vape DZ
[02:27.000 --> 02:29.000] has refused to comment
[02:31.000 --> 02:33.000] First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz
[02:33.000 --> 02:35.000] interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director
[02:35.000 --> 02:37.000] of Grow Local, South Texas
[02:37.000 --> 02:39.000] concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers
[02:39.000 --> 02:41.000] and Gardeners Association conference
[02:41.000 --> 02:43.000] which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi
[02:43.000 --> 02:46.000] Omni Hotel from February 14th to 16th
[02:46.000 --> 02:48.000] 6 to 9 p.m.
[02:48.000 --> 02:51.000] You can find the interview at kiiitv.com
[02:53.000 --> 02:55.000] This is Rick Rody with your lowdown
[02:55.000 --> 02:58.000] for February 6th, 2019
[03:12.000 --> 03:14.000] Okay, howdy howdy
[03:14.000 --> 03:16.000] This is Randy Kelton, Rural Law Radio
[03:16.000 --> 03:19.000] on this Friday, the 22nd day
[03:19.000 --> 03:23.000] of March, 2019
[03:23.000 --> 03:25.000] This is our Friday
[03:25.000 --> 03:28.000] 4-hour info marathon
[03:28.000 --> 03:30.000] If you have a question or a comment
[03:30.000 --> 03:33.000] give us a call, I've got the phone lines on
[03:33.000 --> 03:35.000] We'll have them open all night
[03:35.000 --> 03:38.000] and
[03:38.000 --> 03:40.000] Till we get some calls
[03:40.000 --> 03:43.000] I've been wanting to do
[03:43.000 --> 03:46.000] a presentation on
[03:46.000 --> 03:48.000] due process
[03:48.000 --> 03:51.000] on the whole
[03:51.000 --> 03:54.000] process as we've been constructing it
[03:54.000 --> 03:57.000] over a number of years
[03:57.000 --> 04:00.000] I have someone here from out of town
[04:00.000 --> 04:02.000] that I was discussing
[04:02.000 --> 04:05.000] the underlying philosophy with today
[04:05.000 --> 04:08.000] and
[04:08.000 --> 04:11.000] it reminds me that
[04:11.000 --> 04:14.000] I need to present
[04:14.000 --> 04:17.000] this entire structure
[04:17.000 --> 04:21.000] so that it makes sense to people
[04:21.000 --> 04:24.000] but it looks like today won't be
[04:24.000 --> 04:26.000] the day to do that because my phone board
[04:26.000 --> 04:29.000] is already full, almost immediately
[04:29.000 --> 04:32.000] so today won't be the day
[04:32.000 --> 04:35.000] I'll get to do that
[04:35.000 --> 04:38.000] I may just schedule a day for that purpose
[04:38.000 --> 04:41.000] and I want to do a 4-hour show
[04:41.000 --> 04:44.000] on due process
[04:44.000 --> 04:46.000] as an archive so that we can
[04:46.000 --> 04:49.000] one, I can pull down and master
[04:49.000 --> 04:52.000] and have it as one complete presentation
[04:52.000 --> 04:55.000] so we'll plan that sometime
[04:55.000 --> 04:57.000] in the near future but the call board
[04:57.000 --> 04:59.000] is full almost immediately
[04:59.000 --> 05:02.000] and it looks like this first
[05:02.000 --> 05:05.000] call, no it's not, I thought maybe it was
[05:05.000 --> 05:08.000] first time caller but it looks like it's not
[05:08.000 --> 05:11.000] Jackson
[05:11.000 --> 05:14.000] it doesn't give me state, my database
[05:14.000 --> 05:17.000] doesn't show me what state you're in
[05:17.000 --> 05:19.000] hello, are you there?
[05:19.000 --> 05:21.000] yes, I'm here, can you hear me?
[05:21.000 --> 05:23.000] yes, I can hear you
[05:23.000 --> 05:25.000] what do you have for us today?
[05:25.000 --> 05:27.000] I'm in New York State
[05:27.000 --> 05:30.000] I've got an interesting situation with
[05:30.000 --> 05:32.000] okay, hold on, you're a little soft
[05:32.000 --> 05:35.000] can you move the mic a little closer?
[05:35.000 --> 05:37.000] how about that?
[05:37.000 --> 05:39.000] not much better
[05:39.000 --> 05:42.000] well, I don't know what I could do to make
[05:42.000 --> 05:45.000] are you using a bluetooth or a speakerphone?
[05:45.000 --> 05:48.000] no, speakerphone
[05:48.000 --> 05:52.000] that's the problem, can you take that off?
[05:52.000 --> 05:56.000] yeah, I can try, hold on a sec
[05:56.000 --> 05:59.000] those things don't come through very well
[05:59.000 --> 06:03.000] on the air, on Thursday night
[06:03.000 --> 06:06.000] we have Debra as the call screener
[06:06.000 --> 06:09.000] and Debra has perfect pitch ears
[06:09.000 --> 06:12.000] she hears everything
[06:12.000 --> 06:15.000] we don't have that option on Friday night
[06:15.000 --> 06:18.000] so we can't address that issue until we get on the air
[06:18.000 --> 06:22.000] I'm sorry, is that better?
[06:22.000 --> 06:25.000] that's a little bit better, not much
[06:25.000 --> 06:28.000] okay, go ahead, try to speak up just a little bit
[06:28.000 --> 06:32.000] a radio trick
[06:32.000 --> 06:36.000] is inhale, hold some air in your lungs
[06:36.000 --> 06:38.000] it gives your lungs more resonance
[06:38.000 --> 06:40.000] and it comes out better on the mic
[06:40.000 --> 06:43.000] well, I have a little bit of a problem too
[06:43.000 --> 06:46.000] and that I'm just getting over laryngitis
[06:46.000 --> 06:49.000] oh, huh?
[06:49.000 --> 06:53.000] you notice my voice has kind of a hushed tone to it
[06:53.000 --> 06:56.000] I got that hushed tone when I was 10 years old
[06:56.000 --> 06:59.000] and I got it from laryngitis
[06:59.000 --> 07:02.000] I lost my voice from laryngitis
[07:02.000 --> 07:05.000] and it never completely came back
[07:05.000 --> 07:09.000] okay, do your best, I will listen close
[07:09.000 --> 07:12.000] okay
[07:12.000 --> 07:15.000] I got to assess the system
[07:15.000 --> 07:18.000] wait a minute, you just faded right out
[07:18.000 --> 07:20.000] you need to stay close to the mic
[07:20.000 --> 07:23.000] if you turn away from it or something, we'll lose you
[07:23.000 --> 07:25.000] okay, how's that?
[07:25.000 --> 07:27.000] that's better
[07:27.000 --> 07:31.000] okay, I got a traffic ticket for not wearing my seat belt
[07:31.000 --> 07:36.000] the ticket specifically said no seat belt
[07:36.000 --> 07:40.000] okay, so I requested a supporting deposition
[07:40.000 --> 07:42.000] that I never got
[07:42.000 --> 07:45.000] and when we ended up in court
[07:45.000 --> 07:49.000] I told the split judge I didn't get the deposition
[07:49.000 --> 07:52.000] well, he gave you one when he stopped you
[07:52.000 --> 07:55.000] and gave you the ticket, that's good enough
[07:55.000 --> 07:59.000] and then we started with contradictions and perjury
[07:59.000 --> 08:03.000] the police officer first stated
[08:03.000 --> 08:06.000] he mailed me the deposition
[08:06.000 --> 08:08.000] he personally mailed it
[08:08.000 --> 08:11.000] and he had an affidavit, sworn affidavit
[08:11.000 --> 08:13.000] then during the trial he said
[08:13.000 --> 08:15.000] no, he didn't mail it
[08:15.000 --> 08:17.000] someone in the village mailed it
[08:17.000 --> 08:20.000] he doesn't handle the mail
[08:20.000 --> 08:24.000] we had a whole bunch of different contradictions throughout the trial
[08:24.000 --> 08:26.000] just like that
[08:26.000 --> 08:28.000] okay, hold on, hold on
[08:28.000 --> 08:30.000] what state are you in?
[08:30.000 --> 08:32.000] New York
[08:32.000 --> 08:36.000] does New York require
[08:36.000 --> 08:40.000] that you be provided this document?
[08:40.000 --> 08:43.000] if I requested, according to the law
[08:43.000 --> 08:45.000] if I requested
[08:45.000 --> 08:49.000] they are to get it to me within 30 days
[08:49.000 --> 08:52.000] did you file criminally against the police officer
[08:52.000 --> 08:54.000] for not providing it?
[08:54.000 --> 08:56.000] that's correct
[08:56.000 --> 08:59.000] no, that was a question, did you?
[08:59.000 --> 09:01.000] did I what?
[09:01.000 --> 09:04.000] file criminally against the lawyer
[09:04.000 --> 09:07.000] I'm sorry, file criminally against the officer
[09:07.000 --> 09:09.000] for failing to perform a duty
[09:09.000 --> 09:12.000] he was required to perform in the process
[09:12.000 --> 09:15.000] denying you full access to enjoyment, right?
[09:15.000 --> 09:17.000] not yet
[09:17.000 --> 09:19.000] that's crime in every state
[09:19.000 --> 09:22.000] they forget that part
[09:22.000 --> 09:25.000] they think the penal code and the penal law
[09:25.000 --> 09:27.000] will only apply to you
[09:27.000 --> 09:30.000] anyway, okay, so
[09:30.000 --> 09:32.000] so he lied about it
[09:32.000 --> 09:35.000] he never had any kind of poop
[09:35.000 --> 09:38.000] I never got a certified mail return card
[09:38.000 --> 09:41.000] that I had to sign
[09:41.000 --> 09:45.000] which is proper procedure
[09:45.000 --> 09:48.000] if they sent something to you in the mail
[09:48.000 --> 09:51.000] in order for them to have proof of delivery
[09:51.000 --> 09:54.000] they have to send a certified mail
[09:54.000 --> 09:57.000] and he had no proof of delivery
[09:57.000 --> 09:59.000] I never got that
[09:59.000 --> 10:02.000] so did he produce it in court?
[10:02.000 --> 10:04.000] yeah
[10:04.000 --> 10:07.000] which was a little bit too late because
[10:07.000 --> 10:10.000] did you ask for a continuous?
[10:10.000 --> 10:12.000] no
[10:12.000 --> 10:15.000] he wanted to continue with it the way it was
[10:15.000 --> 10:18.000] he said that he was going to continue with it
[10:18.000 --> 10:21.000] in spite of the fact that I didn't get that
[10:21.000 --> 10:23.000] that I had already got the copy
[10:23.000 --> 10:26.000] when the police officer stopped me
[10:26.000 --> 10:29.000] did you file criminal charges against the judge?
[10:29.000 --> 10:31.000] not yet
[10:31.000 --> 10:34.000] oh good, we're getting to the good part
[10:34.000 --> 10:36.000] I'm planning on it
[10:36.000 --> 10:39.000] well, I filed my appeal
[10:39.000 --> 10:43.000] and even the cop during the court process
[10:43.000 --> 10:45.000] said that at one point
[10:45.000 --> 10:48.000] he really couldn't see me from his point of view
[10:48.000 --> 10:51.000] during court he couldn't tell the difference
[10:51.000 --> 10:54.000] between black hair and brown hair
[10:54.000 --> 10:58.000] or a blue jersey and a blue jersey
[10:58.000 --> 11:03.000] but he admitted in court that he had bad eyesight
[11:03.000 --> 11:06.000] anyway, the good part
[11:06.000 --> 11:08.000] I filed my appeal
[11:08.000 --> 11:12.000] they totally ignored the fact that I mentioned that
[11:12.000 --> 11:15.000] they violated my sixth amendment
[11:15.000 --> 11:18.000] that I was denied due process
[11:18.000 --> 11:20.000] because I didn't get the position
[11:20.000 --> 11:24.000] and I wasn't able to prepare my court case properly
[11:24.000 --> 11:27.000] they ignored all that and they just brought up
[11:27.000 --> 11:29.000] all kinds of other stuff
[11:29.000 --> 11:31.000] that was only pertinent to them
[11:31.000 --> 11:34.000] they were trying to make the little things
[11:34.000 --> 11:37.000] that really didn't seem like big things
[11:37.000 --> 11:39.000] if you understand what I mean
[11:39.000 --> 11:41.000] yes, I do, that's what they always do
[11:41.000 --> 11:44.000] we have John from New York
[11:44.000 --> 11:46.000] who was on last night
[11:46.000 --> 11:49.000] and in their appellate documents
[11:49.000 --> 11:51.000] that's exactly what they did
[11:51.000 --> 11:53.000] they addressed the MNUSA
[11:53.000 --> 11:55.000] but the real issue
[11:55.000 --> 11:58.000] the fact that the officer testified
[11:58.000 --> 12:01.000] that the guy really did have his seatbelt on
[12:01.000 --> 12:04.000] and they changed the accusation
[12:04.000 --> 12:07.000] from not wearing a seatbelt to not wearing it properly
[12:07.000 --> 12:12.000] the prosecution in their appellate brief
[12:12.000 --> 12:15.000] ignored that part altogether
[12:15.000 --> 12:18.000] and talked about other stuff
[12:18.000 --> 12:20.000] that works
[12:20.000 --> 12:22.000] and the other interesting part is
[12:22.000 --> 12:25.000] the response that I got back
[12:25.000 --> 12:28.000] the brief that was returned to me
[12:28.000 --> 12:31.000] wasn't even from a judge, it was the ADA
[12:31.000 --> 12:35.000] no, it's never from a judge, it's always the ADA
[12:35.000 --> 12:38.000] the judge doesn't, he doesn't file a brief
[12:38.000 --> 12:40.000] the ADA does that
[12:40.000 --> 12:43.000] I never got anything from the judge
[12:43.000 --> 12:46.000] did you get an order?
[12:46.000 --> 12:48.000] no, I got nothing
[12:48.000 --> 12:51.000] did the judge issue an order in the case?
[12:51.000 --> 12:53.000] no
[12:53.000 --> 12:56.000] so there never was a ruling against you?
[12:56.000 --> 12:59.000] if you're talking about the appellate judge, you know
[12:59.000 --> 13:03.000] the appellate judge doesn't issue an order
[13:03.000 --> 13:07.000] this is confusing
[13:07.000 --> 13:09.000] you go to court
[13:09.000 --> 13:12.000] and the judge renders a judgment
[13:12.000 --> 13:19.000] you file and you appeal his ruling
[13:19.000 --> 13:26.000] the prosecution files a response brief
[13:26.000 --> 13:29.000] showing why his ruling was correct
[13:29.000 --> 13:32.000] you show why his ruling was wrong
[13:32.000 --> 13:36.000] then the court of appeals makes a determination
[13:36.000 --> 13:41.000] whether they believe the judge ruled in error or not
[13:41.000 --> 13:43.000] well, I haven't heard from the court of appeals
[13:43.000 --> 13:45.000] only the ADA
[13:45.000 --> 13:48.000] okay, well, generally the court of appeals
[13:48.000 --> 13:53.000] takes a long time
[13:53.000 --> 13:58.000] in New York, from a traffic citation
[13:58.000 --> 14:03.000] what court do you appeal to?
[14:03.000 --> 14:06.000] well, first we go from the village
[14:06.000 --> 14:10.000] where the verdict was rendered
[14:10.000 --> 14:14.000] to the county court
[14:14.000 --> 14:16.000] and then if we're not happy with that
[14:16.000 --> 14:19.000] I guess we go to Rochester
[14:19.000 --> 14:21.000] which is a district court
[14:21.000 --> 14:23.000] and there's a different judge
[14:23.000 --> 14:25.000] no, no, no, I don't think so, hold on
[14:25.000 --> 14:28.000] in most other states, like in Texas
[14:28.000 --> 14:31.000] if it's a municipal or a justice court
[14:31.000 --> 14:34.000] an inferior court
[14:34.000 --> 14:37.000] and that being a municipal court
[14:37.000 --> 14:39.000] or justice of the peace
[14:39.000 --> 14:42.000] that can have a judge that is not a lawyer
[14:42.000 --> 14:45.000] then it appeals to the county level
[14:45.000 --> 14:47.000] from the county level
[14:47.000 --> 14:51.000] it appeals up to the court of appeals
[14:51.000 --> 14:54.000] now the county level is trash
[14:54.000 --> 14:56.000] they're going to throw you under the bus
[14:56.000 --> 15:00.000] just like the municipal court does
[15:00.000 --> 15:06.000] it's the court of appeals where you're going to lose
[15:06.000 --> 15:09.000] and from there you go on to the supreme
[15:09.000 --> 15:12.000] well actually not the supreme in New York
[15:12.000 --> 15:14.000] in New York the supreme court is the lowest court
[15:14.000 --> 15:17.000] the highest court is kind of odd
[15:17.000 --> 15:22.000] but whatever the highest appellate court in New York is
[15:22.000 --> 15:24.000] so you're in the county court
[15:24.000 --> 15:27.000] you can expect the county court to rule against you
[15:27.000 --> 15:30.000] it's what they do
[15:34.000 --> 15:37.000] now I have to go to the next one
[15:37.000 --> 15:41.000] because the Killing Court already denied it
[15:41.000 --> 15:46.000] hold on did you say the county court already denied it?
[15:46.000 --> 15:48.000] well the county court
[15:48.000 --> 15:52.000] the ADA associated with the county court
[15:52.000 --> 15:56.000] sent me his brief and denied it
[15:56.000 --> 15:59.000] hold on hold on you're missing something
[15:59.000 --> 16:04.000] the ADA is going to argue against everything
[16:04.000 --> 16:08.000] ADA is nothing he's just a lawyer for the other side
[16:08.000 --> 16:12.000] it is the county court judge
[16:12.000 --> 16:16.000] that must render a ruling on the appeal
[16:16.000 --> 16:21.000] has the county court judge rendered a ruling?
[16:21.000 --> 16:24.000] no I haven't heard anything from the county
[16:24.000 --> 16:27.000] then you just have your two documents in
[16:27.000 --> 16:30.000] the judge will get to that when he gets around to it
[16:30.000 --> 16:32.000] and he'll render a ruling one way or another
[16:32.000 --> 16:35.000] then you can take your next step
[16:35.000 --> 16:38.000] hang on we're about to go to break
[16:38.000 --> 16:41.000] this is Randy Kelton with Rule of Law Radio
[16:41.000 --> 16:44.000] our call in number 512-646-1984
[16:44.000 --> 16:47.000] right now the board is full
[16:47.000 --> 16:49.000] so if you have a question or comment
[16:49.000 --> 16:52.000] wait till someone drops off and then call in
[16:52.000 --> 16:55.000] we'll be right back
[17:01.000 --> 17:04.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[17:04.000 --> 17:07.000] in today's America we live in an us against them society
[17:07.000 --> 17:09.000] and if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[17:09.000 --> 17:12.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[17:12.000 --> 17:15.000] among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[17:15.000 --> 17:17.000] the right to act in our own private capacity
[17:17.000 --> 17:19.000] and most importantly the right to due process of law
[17:19.000 --> 17:22.000] traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[17:22.000 --> 17:25.000] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[17:25.000 --> 17:27.000] former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig
[17:27.000 --> 17:29.000] in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together
[17:29.000 --> 17:31.000] the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[17:31.000 --> 17:33.000] that will help you understand what due process is
[17:33.000 --> 17:35.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law
[17:35.000 --> 17:37.000] you can get your own copy of this valuable material
[17:37.000 --> 17:39.000] by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[17:39.000 --> 17:40.000] and ordering your copy today
[17:40.000 --> 17:42.000] by ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[17:42.000 --> 17:45.000] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lai
[17:45.000 --> 17:47.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[17:47.000 --> 17:50.000] hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[17:50.000 --> 17:52.000] learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[17:52.000 --> 17:54.000] from ruleoflawradio.com
[17:54.000 --> 17:56.000] order your copy today and together we can have
[17:56.000 --> 17:59.000] a free society we all want and deserve
[17:59.000 --> 18:02.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors
[18:02.000 --> 18:05.000] with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meyers proven method
[18:09.000 --> 18:12.000] Michael Meyers has won six cases in federal court
[18:12.000 --> 18:15.000] against debt collectors and now you can win two
[18:15.000 --> 18:17.000] you'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[18:17.000 --> 18:20.000] on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute
[18:20.000 --> 18:24.000] what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons
[18:24.000 --> 18:26.000] how to answer letters and phone calls
[18:26.000 --> 18:29.000] how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports
[18:29.000 --> 18:31.000] how to turn the financial tables on them
[18:31.000 --> 18:34.000] and make them pay you to go away
[18:34.000 --> 18:37.000] the Michael Meyers proven method is the solution
[18:37.000 --> 18:39.000] for how to stop debt collectors
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000] personal consultation is available as well
[18:41.000 --> 18:44.000] for more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.000 --> 18:47.000] and click on the blue Michael Meyers banner
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000] or email Michael Meyers at yahoo.com
[18:50.000 --> 18:52.000] that's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:52.000 --> 18:57.000] or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.000 --> 19:00.000] to learn how to stop debt collectors now
[19:02.000 --> 19:05.000] you are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:05.000 --> 19:23.000] Logos Radio Network at yahoo.com
[19:23.000 --> 19:25.000] now okay we are back Randy Kelton
[19:25.000 --> 19:29.000] rule of law radio and we're talking to Jackson
[19:29.000 --> 19:32.000] it's Dale Jackson okay Dale
[19:32.000 --> 19:35.000] talking to Dale in New York
[19:35.000 --> 19:37.000] go ahead Bill
[19:37.000 --> 19:40.000] anyway at this point you're saying that I have to wait
[19:40.000 --> 19:42.000] until I hear from the judge
[19:42.000 --> 19:43.000] yes
[19:43.000 --> 19:47.000] okay but in the meantime that doesn't stop me from
[19:47.000 --> 19:52.000] filing against the judge and the cop
[19:52.000 --> 19:55.000] and the prosecutor
[19:55.000 --> 19:57.000] why the prosecutor
[19:57.000 --> 19:59.000] anything they do wrong
[19:59.000 --> 20:03.000] they think they can do pretty much anything they want to
[20:03.000 --> 20:07.000] and they're not accustomed to someone coming back after them
[20:07.000 --> 20:10.000] if the policeman lied on the stand
[20:10.000 --> 20:12.000] charging with aggravated perjury
[20:12.000 --> 20:15.000] he won't get prosecuted for aggravated perjury
[20:15.000 --> 20:18.000] everybody will jump in line to protect him
[20:18.000 --> 20:21.000] what will harm him more
[20:21.000 --> 20:24.000] is a professional conduct complaint
[20:24.000 --> 20:28.000] filed with the agency that accredits police officers
[20:28.000 --> 20:31.000] police officers
[20:31.000 --> 20:35.000] every state has an agency that trains and then
[20:35.000 --> 20:38.000] certifies peace officers
[20:38.000 --> 20:44.000] you'll check with the state whoever certifies peace officers
[20:44.000 --> 20:47.000] in Texas is T. Close
[20:47.000 --> 20:50.000] Texas
[20:50.000 --> 20:53.000] Commission on Law Enforcement
[20:53.000 --> 20:55.000] each state has a different one
[20:55.000 --> 20:59.000] the local agencies they don't train and certify peace officers
[20:59.000 --> 21:03.000] the state has a
[21:03.000 --> 21:06.000] agency that does that
[21:06.000 --> 21:12.000] and you want to file a complaint against their license
[21:12.000 --> 21:15.000] now if you file a criminal complaint against them
[21:15.000 --> 21:19.000] they're all got their snouts in the same trough
[21:19.000 --> 21:21.000] and they will gather together
[21:21.000 --> 21:24.000] do everything they can to block you
[21:24.000 --> 21:26.000] at least when I do that
[21:26.000 --> 21:28.000] at least that's what I hope they do
[21:28.000 --> 21:30.000] now I'll explain that in a minute
[21:30.000 --> 21:34.000] it would be a better police
[21:34.000 --> 21:38.000] if you file a professional conduct complaint
[21:38.000 --> 21:40.000] against the officer
[21:40.000 --> 21:44.000] that goes to the commission that certifies peace officers
[21:44.000 --> 21:48.000] and that goes to the peace officers
[21:48.000 --> 21:51.000] insurance is bonding
[21:51.000 --> 21:55.000] a police officer is not individually insured
[21:55.000 --> 21:58.000] the agency he works for has a bond
[21:58.000 --> 22:02.000] and that bond insures all the police officers
[22:02.000 --> 22:07.000] if an officer gets too many complaints against him
[22:07.000 --> 22:12.000] the bonding agent
[22:12.000 --> 22:16.000] his job is to charge his client as much as possible
[22:16.000 --> 22:19.000] and avoid paying any claims
[22:19.000 --> 22:22.000] so he's just sitting there waiting
[22:22.000 --> 22:29.000] for an opportunity to increase the bond rating against the jurisdiction
[22:29.000 --> 22:34.000] so when you file a complaint with the agency
[22:34.000 --> 22:36.000] against the officer
[22:36.000 --> 22:39.000] the accreditation agency is going to get that complaint
[22:39.000 --> 22:42.000] and they're going to throw it in the trash
[22:42.000 --> 22:44.000] and they're going to send you this letter back
[22:44.000 --> 22:46.000] that says we examine your accusation
[22:46.000 --> 22:49.000] and it does not rise to the level of misconduct
[22:49.000 --> 22:51.000] it doesn't matter what he did
[22:51.000 --> 22:53.000] that's what you're going to get
[22:53.000 --> 22:56.000] and that's a good thing
[22:56.000 --> 22:59.000] the reason it's a good thing
[22:59.000 --> 23:03.000] is the bonding agent knows they're going to do that
[23:03.000 --> 23:06.000] so how does he gauge his level of risk
[23:06.000 --> 23:08.000] by valid complaints?
[23:08.000 --> 23:11.000] by the numbers
[23:11.000 --> 23:14.000] with lawyers it's worse
[23:14.000 --> 23:16.000] but as I understand
[23:16.000 --> 23:21.000] six professional conduct complaints against a police officer
[23:21.000 --> 23:25.000] and he becomes unemployable
[23:25.000 --> 23:29.000] because the bonding agent
[23:29.000 --> 23:32.000] if they hire him will raise their bond rating
[23:32.000 --> 23:34.000] if he's already working for the agency
[23:34.000 --> 23:38.000] and they keep him they'll raise the bond rating
[23:38.000 --> 23:41.000] he's toast
[23:41.000 --> 23:44.000] valid, invalid, it don't make any difference
[23:44.000 --> 23:46.000] he's screwed
[23:46.000 --> 23:49.000] lawyers, one bar grievance, your first year of practice
[23:49.000 --> 23:51.000] cancel immediately
[23:51.000 --> 23:54.000] two bar grievances, any one year of practice they cancel
[23:54.000 --> 23:58.000] three, they cancel your law firm's malpractice insurance
[23:58.000 --> 24:01.000] oh, the lawyer's just whine and belly ache
[24:01.000 --> 24:04.000] that is petly unfair
[24:04.000 --> 24:08.000] yeah, life is tough, deal with it guys
[24:08.000 --> 24:11.000] these are tools you can use against them
[24:11.000 --> 24:14.000] one of the things that we pay close attention to
[24:14.000 --> 24:17.000] is politics
[24:17.000 --> 24:22.000] you're taught in school that you have all these inalienable rights
[24:22.000 --> 24:26.000] and you have a constitution that protects you
[24:26.000 --> 24:29.000] and you have the police and they're there to protect you
[24:29.000 --> 24:31.000] and preserve your rights
[24:31.000 --> 24:33.000] horse manure
[24:33.000 --> 24:36.000] they could care less about your rights
[24:36.000 --> 24:39.000] the police got a job to do if they have Trump on your rights
[24:39.000 --> 24:41.000] to get it done, they don't care
[24:41.000 --> 24:44.000] no one cares about your rights, you
[24:44.000 --> 24:48.000] so, at the end of the day
[24:48.000 --> 24:51.000] the law does not carry the day
[24:51.000 --> 24:55.000] we say on the show that you will never win your case
[24:55.000 --> 25:00.000] simply because you have the law and the facts on your side
[25:00.000 --> 25:03.000] to think so is naive
[25:03.000 --> 25:06.000] it is not that way now
[25:06.000 --> 25:10.000] never has been that way since we've had human beings as judges
[25:10.000 --> 25:14.000] you will win your case if you have the politics on your side
[25:14.000 --> 25:16.000] and all politics is local
[25:16.000 --> 25:19.000] now, this is not a problem
[25:19.000 --> 25:23.000] unless you don't know that it's all political
[25:23.000 --> 25:26.000] if you think you can win your case
[25:26.000 --> 25:28.000] by having the law and the facts on your side
[25:28.000 --> 25:30.000] then it's a problem
[25:30.000 --> 25:34.000] but once you understand it's political
[25:34.000 --> 25:39.000] there's something else that you will come to understand
[25:39.000 --> 25:41.000] and that it is
[25:41.000 --> 25:48.000] who is the most politically powerful person in the courthouse
[25:48.000 --> 25:51.000] it's not the judge
[25:51.000 --> 25:55.000] it's not the prosecutor, the bailiff, the clerk
[25:55.000 --> 25:58.000] all those guys are public servants
[25:58.000 --> 26:02.000] you are the master of those servants
[26:02.000 --> 26:05.000] and when one of your servants forgets that
[26:05.000 --> 26:08.000] it's your job to land on them like a ton of bricks
[26:08.000 --> 26:12.000] and you can certainly do that
[26:12.000 --> 26:17.000] and the best way to do that is to charge them criminally
[26:17.000 --> 26:22.000] there's one statute in every state
[26:22.000 --> 26:25.000] everybody should have memorized
[26:25.000 --> 26:29.000] and that's the official misconduct statute
[26:29.000 --> 26:31.000] every state has it
[26:31.000 --> 26:35.000] it reflects the Ku Klux Klan Act
[26:35.000 --> 26:39.000] most people who know about the Ku Klux Klan Act
[26:39.000 --> 26:44.000] think of it in terms of 42 U.S. Code 1983
[26:44.000 --> 26:49.000] that's the federal statute that allows you to sue public officials
[26:49.000 --> 26:52.000] if they deny you in a right
[26:52.000 --> 26:56.000] but that's the second part of the Ku Klux Klan Act
[26:56.000 --> 26:59.000] the first part of the Ku Klux Klan Act
[26:59.000 --> 27:03.000] was codified into 18 U.S. Code 242
[27:03.000 --> 27:06.000] that's criminal
[27:06.000 --> 27:10.000] if a public official, and I'm paraphrasing this a little bit long
[27:10.000 --> 27:14.000] if a public official acting under the color
[27:14.000 --> 27:18.000] or pretense of an official capacity
[27:18.000 --> 27:23.000] exerts or purports to exert an authority they do not expressly have
[27:23.000 --> 27:28.000] or fails to perform a duty they're required to perform
[27:28.000 --> 27:31.000] and in the process denies you
[27:31.000 --> 27:35.000] in the full and free access to or enjoyment of right
[27:35.000 --> 27:39.000] that's a class A misdemeanor in every state
[27:39.000 --> 27:43.000] so go ahead judge
[27:43.000 --> 27:48.000] appeal to properly apply the law to the facts
[27:48.000 --> 27:51.000] and I'll file against you with the grand jury
[27:51.000 --> 27:54.000] judge you say well if you don't like my ruling
[27:54.000 --> 27:56.000] you can appeal
[27:56.000 --> 27:58.000] and I had a district judge in Travis County
[27:58.000 --> 28:00.000] when I bushwacked him in his courtroom
[28:00.000 --> 28:04.000] with some complaints against all the highest judges in Texas
[28:04.000 --> 28:09.000] he told me that I could appeal
[28:09.000 --> 28:12.000] so judge don't ask me to appeal
[28:12.000 --> 28:15.000] before this corrupt judge and they render a bogus ruling
[28:15.000 --> 28:17.000] and they say oh that's okay
[28:17.000 --> 28:20.000] you can appeal to a whole panel of corrupt judges
[28:20.000 --> 28:22.000] and they'll really screw your royal
[28:22.000 --> 28:25.000] the judge kind of laughed and he said well Mr. Kelton
[28:25.000 --> 28:27.000] I don't think it's quite that bad
[28:27.000 --> 28:30.000] that's because you're not pro se
[28:30.000 --> 28:32.000] I got a better idea
[28:32.000 --> 28:34.000] I'll appeal to the grand jury
[28:34.000 --> 28:37.000] he said well Mr. Kelton you can't appeal to the grand jury
[28:37.000 --> 28:38.000] sure can
[28:38.000 --> 28:42.000] I can appeal to the grand jury to arrest the judge for official misconduct
[28:46.000 --> 28:49.000] oh he hadn't thought about that
[28:49.000 --> 28:52.000] you're the only one who can do that
[28:52.000 --> 28:55.000] you're the only one in the courthouse who can do that
[28:55.000 --> 29:00.000] and when you file a criminal complaint against one of them
[29:00.000 --> 29:04.000] you become a protected class
[29:04.000 --> 29:08.000] now it becomes hands off
[29:08.000 --> 29:11.000] once I call 9-1-1 on one of them
[29:11.000 --> 29:14.000] and I'll do it in heartbeat
[29:14.000 --> 29:16.000] once I call 9-1-1
[29:16.000 --> 29:19.000] I get one word out of them
[29:19.000 --> 29:22.000] that I can in any way
[29:22.000 --> 29:24.000] take as a threat
[29:24.000 --> 29:27.000] like oh Mr. Kelton
[29:27.000 --> 29:32.000] you really have to be careful filing these criminal charges
[29:32.000 --> 29:37.000] you could get in a lot of trouble 9-1-1
[29:37.000 --> 29:41.000] I want somebody to come out and arrest this guy for threatening me
[29:41.000 --> 29:45.000] for the purpose of obstructing justice and tampering with a witness
[29:45.000 --> 29:47.000] both of them felonies
[29:47.000 --> 29:49.000] well I didn't threaten you
[29:49.000 --> 29:51.000] well it doesn't matter what you meant
[29:51.000 --> 29:53.000] it matters how I took it
[29:53.000 --> 29:56.000] and since you're standing there with a pistol on your hip
[29:56.000 --> 29:58.000] warning me that I can get in trouble
[29:58.000 --> 30:01.000] I took that as a threat
[30:01.000 --> 30:03.000] all aboard?
[30:03.000 --> 30:06.000] when mold spread through the dorms of St. Mary's College in Maryland
[30:06.000 --> 30:10.000] the school relocated its students to a cruise ship
[30:10.000 --> 30:15.000] and Dr. Catherine Albrecht with an ocean tale of kids sailing through college next
[30:15.000 --> 30:17.000] privacy is under attack
[30:17.000 --> 30:19.000] when you give up data about yourself
[30:19.000 --> 30:21.000] you'll never get it back again
[30:21.000 --> 30:23.000] and once your privacy is gone
[30:23.000 --> 30:25.000] you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[30:25.000 --> 30:27.000] so protect your rights
[30:27.000 --> 30:30.000] say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[30:30.000 --> 30:33.000] privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[30:33.000 --> 30:37.000] this public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com
[30:37.000 --> 30:41.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[30:41.000 --> 30:44.000] start over with StartPage
[30:44.000 --> 30:47.000] after tropical storm Irene swept through Maryland
[30:47.000 --> 30:51.000] mold spread like wildfire through the dorms of St. Mary's College
[30:51.000 --> 30:54.000] 250 students had to be relocated
[30:54.000 --> 30:55.000] but where?
[30:55.000 --> 30:57.000] hotels? well that cost a fortune
[30:57.000 --> 31:01.000] 20,000 a day so St. Mary's President came up with a whale of an idea
[31:01.000 --> 31:04.000] how about putting the students up on a cruise ship
[31:04.000 --> 31:08.000] it just so happened the sea voyager cruise ship was on its way down from Maine
[31:08.000 --> 31:13.000] with the owners mind docking in Maryland and turning their vessel into a floating dorm
[31:13.000 --> 31:14.000] no problem
[31:14.000 --> 31:17.000] so now the students are enjoying fine onboard dining
[31:17.000 --> 31:20.000] sweet looking sweets and a breathtaking waterfront view
[31:20.000 --> 31:22.000] talk about smooth sailing
[31:22.000 --> 31:27.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[31:52.000 --> 31:54.000] bring justice to my son
[31:54.000 --> 31:55.000] my uncle
[31:55.000 --> 31:56.000] my nephew
[31:56.000 --> 31:57.000] my son
[31:57.000 --> 31:58.000] go to
[31:58.000 --> 31:59.000] buildingwhat.org
[31:59.000 --> 32:00.000] why it fell
[32:00.000 --> 32:01.000] why it matters
[32:01.000 --> 32:21.000] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[32:21.000 --> 32:38.000] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com
[32:38.000 --> 32:45.000] mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[32:45.000 --> 33:01.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[33:01.000 --> 33:16.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:16.000 --> 33:32.000] I'm going to rent, and I'm going to solve them, to document them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:32.000 --> 33:58.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton will radio on this Friday, the 22nd day of March, 2019, and we're talking to Dale in New York. Okay.
[33:58.000 --> 34:05.000] I have just one more question, Mr. Kelton, if I may. Okay.
[34:05.000 --> 34:23.000] The judge. Now, I know he violated the judiciary campaign ethics. He used photographs of himself in the courtroom behind his bench for his recent campaign to be reelected.
[34:23.000 --> 34:41.000] I'm going to file with the district and Rochester on that one. I'm also going to file some charges against him for allowing perjury in his courtroom and whatever else that I've got that I can file against him.
[34:41.000 --> 34:45.000] Hold on. Is he running for reelection now?
[34:45.000 --> 34:50.000] He was reelected, and yes, he used photographs of himself.
[34:50.000 --> 35:05.000] Okay. Well, what was getting at him was, if he's already reelected, he missed a good opportunity. If he was running, then you make up criminal complaints and send him to his opponent.
[35:05.000 --> 35:14.000] Oh, his opponent was already aware of him. In fact, his opponent is the one that gave me the photographs.
[35:14.000 --> 35:22.000] Oh. So maybe next time you'll get to nailing.
[35:22.000 --> 35:43.000] In addition to the little package that I planned to put together, I was going to put that into, you know, just the kind of good that we want that abuses his judiciary campaign ethics and so on and so on and so on.
[35:43.000 --> 35:56.000] So the best way to do it, you know, you're the citizen, you're the master of the servant, you get to file on them. You can really take them to task. They don't want you to know that.
[35:56.000 --> 36:07.000] Because once you get it figured out, you find out there's nothing they can do to you. They don't dare do anything to you.
[36:07.000 --> 36:14.000] I had a policeman. I live right next to City Hall in a small town in Texas.
[36:14.000 --> 36:21.000] And I was out doing some plastic welding on a tank during a fire ban, as we were in a big drought.
[36:21.000 --> 36:30.000] This new policeman didn't know who I was and came up and said, sir, sir, I said, yes, you can't have that open flame. It's a little propane torch.
[36:30.000 --> 36:39.000] And I said, sure, Ken, look, nothing to it. No, no, you don't understand. We have a fire band on. I said, you see all this equipment here? This is all higher pressure equipment.
[36:39.000 --> 36:44.000] I can outrun the fire department. I understand, sir, but you can't have that open flame.
[36:44.000 --> 36:50.000] Wait a minute. You're just joshing me, right? Oh, no, sir.
[36:50.000 --> 37:08.000] Wait a minute. That district judge, John Faustel, sent you down here to harass me, didn't he? Just because I filed one crummy little criminal complaint against him with the attorney general for making a terroristic threat, he sent you down here, didn't he?
[37:08.000 --> 37:27.000] This policeman stepped back, held up both hands with his palms out and said, one moment, sir, took out his cell phone, dialed. In about 30 seconds, the chief of police stepped out of city hall, looked across at me and said, Randy, what are you doing to my new officer?
[37:27.000 --> 37:41.000] I said, oh, Tom, I was just jerking his chain. And the officer said, oh, God, I saw my whole career pass before my eyes.
[37:41.000 --> 38:01.000] They are terrified of those judges. The higher level the judges, the more afraid of them they are. And the higher levels of judge, the more sensitive they are to politics. So the more leverage you have against them.
[38:01.000 --> 38:20.000] And I look forward to having an opportunity to file criminal charges against the highest judges in the neighborhood. For anything, the more nitpicking and odd and unusual it is, the better.
[38:20.000 --> 38:40.000] When they get the complaint, I want them to think they didn't see that coming. Judge raises voice to me in court, he gets criminal charges for that. If you have never asked a bailiff to arrest the judge in court, you just haven't lived.
[38:40.000 --> 38:57.000] That is so much fun. You won't believe it. When you do that, it looks like a Chinese fire drill. I did that in Temple, Texas, three times in one court hearing.
[38:57.000 --> 39:10.000] And the judge would jump up, clear the jury, clear the jury, and while the jury is trailing out, I'm arguing with the bailiff about whether or not he's going to drag the judge off the bench and drag him off the jail.
[39:10.000 --> 39:19.000] And the judge each time set up there and kept his mouth shut. One word out of him.
[39:19.000 --> 39:35.000] There was no witness tampering obstruction. Both of them felonies, he knows it, he knew I knew it. He knew by me asking the bailiff in court to arrest him that I was trying to get the judge to say something.
[39:35.000 --> 39:51.000] And I had one do it. I did that to a district judge in Montgomery County, Conroe, where I filed a habeas corpus. And they had stopped a murder trial. They finished examining a witness sent the jury out.
[39:51.000 --> 40:01.000] The judge got up there and said, are you Mr. Kelton? Yes, I am. You filed this habeas. As a matter of fact, I'm dead. Mr. Kelton, are you an attorney? Oh, no judge.
[40:01.000 --> 40:10.000] I sleep well at night and keep my hands in my own pockets. Thank you very much. Well, since you're not an attorney, I'm not going to accept this habeas.
[40:10.000 --> 40:17.000] I turned to the bailiff. Did you hear that, Mr. Bailiff? Yes, Mr. Kelton, I did. Arrest that judge.
[40:17.000 --> 40:27.000] So I can't arrest the judge. It's your kind. Just go up there and throw the cuffs on him and drag him off the jail. You don't have far to go. It's right down the basement.
[40:27.000 --> 40:37.000] I told the bailiff to take his chicken suit off. He said he wasn't taking his chicken suit off. And I told the bailiff, life was filled with little decisions.
[40:37.000 --> 40:45.000] We all get to make something. Are you going to perform your duty as prescribed by Article 2.13 Code of Criminal Procedure and keep the peace in the courtroom?
[40:45.000 --> 41:03.000] Or are you going to seal this judge from prosecution in violation 3805 Pilco? It's your call. I'm not going to arrest the judge. Then the judge picked up the gavel and he said, Mr. Bailiff, if Mr. Kelton doesn't leave my courtroom, you're to arrest him.
[41:03.000 --> 41:15.000] I turned to the judge and said, Your Honor, with all due respect, that's cheating. He held up the gavel and he said, Yeah, maybe, but I got the gavel. Good point.
[41:15.000 --> 41:35.000] Turn to the bailiff. You come with me and I stormed out of the courtroom. That was so much fun. You've never done it. You got to try it once. What it will do is it will break a pattern.
[41:35.000 --> 41:53.000] We all have this pattern we carry around that makes us afraid of judges. Our first interaction with public officials is school. We're forced to go to a government mandated school system.
[41:53.000 --> 42:13.000] And in that school system, we deal with government officials. And in that school system, they tell us what great and wonderful rights we have. However, while you're in this school, don't even think of trying to express one of those as a whole weighted system laying right square on your head.
[42:13.000 --> 42:27.000] You get out of 12 years of that school that hypocrisy. And you're having more dealings with public officials. And then one day you get a ticket. You get called into court and you're called before the judge.
[42:27.000 --> 42:39.000] Well, you look in your past, in your history, for a set of behaviors that you can use in this context. What have you got?
[42:39.000 --> 42:51.000] You got a sixth grader being sent to the principal. So you stand up in front of the judge. You're terrified. You're butterflies in your stomach. You can hardly talk.
[42:51.000 --> 43:06.000] I watched a man in his, had to be in his 60s, real expensive suit. The guy looked like a high level executive. They called him up in front of the judge. He had some notes in his hand. His hand was shaking so bad.
[43:06.000 --> 43:18.000] He couldn't read his notes. He could hardly speak. The only behavioral set he had for public officials was being called before principal.
[43:18.000 --> 43:38.000] Everything I do in this radio station to show is about juxtaposing that behavioral set with the behavioral set of an irate parent wanting to know what you chumps are doing to my kids. If I can make that juxtaposition, we can change everything.
[43:38.000 --> 43:50.000] This is Randy Calcum. We have our radio. I call in number 512. I'm not going to give that out. It's still got a full board. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[44:09.000 --> 44:24.000] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers and journalists.
[44:24.000 --> 44:27.000] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[44:27.000 --> 44:39.000] In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst. We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storeable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[44:39.000 --> 44:54.000] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept bitcoins as payment. Call us at 512-646-644-0. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday, 10-6, Saturdays, 10-2.
[44:54.000 --> 44:59.000] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[45:24.000 --> 45:29.000] We're open Monday through Friday, 10-1 with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:29.000 --> 45:35.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:35.000 --> 45:44.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:44.000 --> 45:53.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more.
[45:53.000 --> 46:01.000] Visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:01.000 --> 46:30.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Carlson, rule of law radio on this the 22nd day of March, 2019, and we're talking to Dale in New York.
[46:30.000 --> 46:37.000] Okay, Dale, I kind of do this sometimes when you go to a subject I really like and I think it's important.
[46:37.000 --> 46:45.000] I kind of steal from you that your time and run away with the show. Did I answer your last question?
[46:45.000 --> 47:08.000] Yeah, pretty much, but it's part two of that question. In the meantime, while I'm waiting for the appellate judge to make his decision, or the county judge I know, is there any reason why I can't file a complaint against the judge and the police officer while I'm waiting?
[47:08.000 --> 47:23.000] None that I can think of. And it's my position that you should file quick and file often. I have a traffic ticket website. It's primarily written for Texas.
[47:23.000 --> 47:29.000] I've been trying to get people who are researching other states to give you their research so I can set it up for other states.
[47:29.000 --> 47:39.000] But on that one, you put your ticket information in and if you're from Texas, it will download your criminal complaint against the police officer.
[47:39.000 --> 47:44.000] First crack out of the hat. First degree felony aggravated assault.
[47:44.000 --> 48:01.000] So anytime you have reason to believe that a crime has been committed, you have a duty to report. If the crime happens to be a felony and you don't report knowledge of a felony, that's a class A misdemeanor.
[48:01.000 --> 48:17.000] You can get to your year in jail. And that's a good thing because if you can be punished for not reporting, you absolutely cannot be punished for reporting.
[48:17.000 --> 48:32.000] And once you report a crime, you have the same protections that a judge has. Anybody just frowns at you. You can nail them.
[48:32.000 --> 48:52.000] And what I like to do is I like to file against a high level judge so that if anybody down at the bottom does anything I don't like, I will accuse the judge of sending that person out to harass me in retaliation for refiling against the judge.
[48:52.000 --> 49:16.000] The best thing to hammer the judge with is something for which he is absolutely innocent because he's going to go ballistic and jump up and down and rail in righteousness and indignation at these poor beleaguered police officers.
[49:16.000 --> 49:24.000] Once you've done that to the police one time, you won't be able to tie a policeman up and throw him at you.
[49:24.000 --> 49:42.000] So this judge does whatever he wants, however he wants. He was supposed to have sent the CD, the recording of the trial to the transcriber within a short time.
[49:42.000 --> 49:46.000] It took him almost two months.
[49:46.000 --> 50:02.000] Okay, New York is the only state ever saw this happen. We had a guy in near Albany who the judge didn't call him to trial on a traffic ticket for like nine months.
[50:02.000 --> 50:11.000] And he filed a judicial complaint against him for it and they sanctioned him for not maintaining his docket.
[50:11.000 --> 50:18.000] New York actually has a commission that works, or at least it used to.
[50:18.000 --> 50:21.000] So filed against him.
[50:21.000 --> 50:34.000] And if he's stupid enough to say something about it in court, oh good, that's official oppression or official misconduct, witness tampering.
[50:34.000 --> 50:38.000] Then you get to hammer him good.
[50:38.000 --> 50:45.000] The best part about that is you get to sting him good and lower level judges.
[50:45.000 --> 50:51.000] Ken Magnuson, he's kind of a civil strategy go to guy.
[50:51.000 --> 50:57.000] His brother is a lawyer and he was a municipal judge in Mansfield, Texas.
[50:57.000 --> 51:11.000] And he felt like the state commission on judicial conduct never sanctioned the higher level judges. They only sanctioned JPs and municipal judges because they didn't have to be lawyers.
[51:11.000 --> 51:16.000] He happened to be a lawyer, but he didn't have to be. And they were considered inferior courts.
[51:16.000 --> 51:29.000] And they felt like only those courts got sanctioned by the state commission on judicial conduct so that they could demonstrate to the public that they actually did stuff.
[51:29.000 --> 51:37.000] And I checked the records of the state commission and I think they're right.
[51:37.000 --> 51:43.000] They hammer these low level judges and let the higher level judges get away with anything you want to.
[51:43.000 --> 51:53.000] So, from our perspective, especially when we're dealing with tickets and such, that's a good thing.
[51:53.000 --> 52:00.000] The judge is never going to tell you how much the judicial conduct complaints scares him.
[52:00.000 --> 52:09.000] The more it scares him, the more quiet he's going to be because he does not want you to know how bad that stings him.
[52:09.000 --> 52:28.000] So, I suggest you file against him any time you don't like what they did because the canons say that the judge must conduct his court in such a way that he gives the impression of fairness.
[52:28.000 --> 52:37.000] All you have to say is you got the impression he was not being fair and he's violated the canons.
[52:37.000 --> 52:47.000] I would love to send you a copy of the transcript of my recent appearance in front of this guy.
[52:47.000 --> 53:01.000] It starts out with the name of the defendant, me, and then plaintiff, unidentified, next person, unidentified, next person, unidentified.
[53:01.000 --> 53:08.000] He never had them identify themselves in court.
[53:08.000 --> 53:14.000] Well, that's interesting. Did you raise an objection to that?
[53:14.000 --> 53:20.000] That courtroom was so confusing. There were so many people talking.
[53:20.000 --> 53:25.000] That's another thing I want to charge him with, but he has no control over his courtroom.
[53:25.000 --> 53:30.000] Now, that will get him hammered.
[53:30.000 --> 53:39.000] That's what got this judge, who we've talked about, hammered because he didn't control the court, he didn't control the stockade.
[53:39.000 --> 53:46.000] Oh, did you just have fun with him? He raised his voice to you.
[53:46.000 --> 53:59.000] This transcript is perfect because it identifies one person as voice number one and then voice number two and woman's voice and his mother.
[53:59.000 --> 54:02.000] Nobody ever got to identify themselves.
[54:02.000 --> 54:11.000] And there's all these people that are talking and there should have only been two, me and the plaintiff.
[54:11.000 --> 54:32.000] So, grief him for it, follow judicial conduct complaints, look at the canons and for each one of the canons, you can claim that he violated, file a separate one for each one and file them a few days apart.
[54:32.000 --> 54:35.000] If you file them all at once, they'll treat it like one.
[54:35.000 --> 54:40.000] If you file them one at a time, then they have to address them one at a time.
[54:40.000 --> 54:46.000] They just start piling them in on him, filing against the officer, filing against all of them.
[54:46.000 --> 54:48.000] You guys want to fight?
[54:48.000 --> 54:50.000] I'll give you one.
[54:50.000 --> 54:55.000] Best offense and best defense, a good effective offense.
[54:55.000 --> 54:57.000] The sooner the better.
[54:57.000 --> 55:10.000] The judge's secretary in Rochester that I would file these complaints with and she said, be specific, be detailed and, you know, file the complaint.
[55:10.000 --> 55:16.000] Okay, go to jurismprudence.com.
[55:16.000 --> 55:18.000] I'm sorry.
[55:18.000 --> 55:22.000] Jurismprudence.website.
[55:22.000 --> 55:27.000] I own.com, but I can't seem to get it implemented. I had a problem with it.
[55:27.000 --> 55:31.000] Jurismprudence.website.
[55:31.000 --> 55:34.000] And right at the top, there's a link to Cherokee County.
[55:34.000 --> 55:36.000] Click on that.
[55:36.000 --> 55:40.000] And there's a folder with criminal complaints.
[55:40.000 --> 55:41.000] Click on that.
[55:41.000 --> 55:44.000] And in there, there's an affidavit.
[55:44.000 --> 55:50.000] That's about a situation where I was prosecuted and a whole bunch of stuff happened.
[55:50.000 --> 55:56.000] And I write this detailed affidavit, a statement of facts.
[55:56.000 --> 55:59.000] These are the things that happened.
[55:59.000 --> 56:08.000] And in the process of doing this, the facts that I'm addressing go to criminal complaints.
[56:08.000 --> 56:10.000] And I walk down the list.
[56:10.000 --> 56:13.000] I look at what all they did and what crimes they committed.
[56:13.000 --> 56:19.000] And I write this affidavit pointing to each crime they committed.
[56:19.000 --> 56:26.000] And once I've got the affidavit finished, then I go back to the top and I take the first crime that I referenced.
[56:26.000 --> 56:28.000] And I cut that part out.
[56:28.000 --> 56:33.000] And I take a criminal complaint and I drop that part of the affidavit into the criminal complaint.
[56:33.000 --> 56:39.000] And I go down to the next one and I look, some places I've got two or three people involved in one situation.
[56:39.000 --> 56:43.000] And it may have official oppression tampered with the government document.
[56:43.000 --> 56:53.000] They're burgery. I copy that section out and put it in all of the complaints and one set for each person involved.
[56:53.000 --> 56:57.000] I wound up with 35 criminal complaints in this one.
[56:57.000 --> 57:12.000] And you look down through it, you'll see how if you build a comprehensive statement and write it from the perspective of filing criminal charges against them,
[57:12.000 --> 57:21.000] then you write your statement in the verbiage of criminal accusations so that you get that to a grand jury.
[57:21.000 --> 57:26.000] They read the statement and then they read the complaint.
[57:26.000 --> 57:31.000] And the complaint has part of the statement in it, exact verbiage.
[57:31.000 --> 57:33.000] So they read the same thing again.
[57:33.000 --> 57:37.000] And then it looks to complain against the next guy. They read the same thing again.
[57:37.000 --> 57:42.000] About the third time they read it, they got it memorized. It sticks in their brain.
[57:42.000 --> 57:46.000] This is a style of methodology for doing that.
[57:46.000 --> 57:59.000] Go look at that. It will give you a good idea how to write these and write these in a way that these guys will look at them and they will not want these to get to a grand jury.
[57:59.000 --> 58:06.000] Grand juries at best is always a crapshoot.
[58:06.000 --> 58:11.000] And, you know, these public officials, they feel like a grand jury won't indict them.
[58:11.000 --> 58:22.000] However, my prosecutor once told me those darn grand jurors, you never know what they're going to do.
[58:22.000 --> 58:27.000] And I said, there is a God.
[58:27.000 --> 58:30.000] It couldn't hurt anything better.
[58:30.000 --> 58:33.000] Hang on. We're about to go to break.
[58:33.000 --> 58:38.000] This is Randy Kelton. We've got radio.
[58:38.000 --> 58:44.000] Still got 4-on. We'll finish up with Dale on the other side and then we'll have a phone line open.
[58:44.000 --> 58:50.000] Call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 59:01.000] Bibles 4 America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000] The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:13.000] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:28.000] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:28.000 --> 59:34.000] To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:34.000 --> 59:41.000] call Bibles 4 America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:41.000 --> 59:45.000] That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.000 --> 59:59.000] Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:23.000] Markets for Wednesday the 6th of February 2019.
[01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:27.000] Open with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:29.000] Silver, $15.77 an ounce.
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:31.000] Copper, $2.83 an ounce.
[01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:34.000] Oil, Texas Crude, $3.66 a barrel.
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:37.000] Brent Crude, $61.98 a barrel.
[01:00:37.000 --> 01:00:45.000] And cryptos in order of market capitalization, Bitcoin, $3,401.64, Ripple, XRP, $0.29.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:54.000] Ethereum, $10.10 and Eos is at $2.32 a crypto coin.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:01:09.000] Today in History, the year 1918, British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property qualifications get the right to vote when the Representation of the People Act of 1918 was passed by Parliament.
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:27.000] In recent news, several Texas-based organizations filed a lawsuit today requesting that a federal court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally registered to vote.
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:46.000] In 1950, which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens who were registered to vote when obtaining age arbitrage license. Over half of the 95,000 did indeed vote, it seems. However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:51.000] Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:57.000] Other voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond with proof of eligibility.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:09.000] Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:24.000] A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck after a vape pen exploded while he was using it. It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it. An x-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem.
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:30.000] The vape store, Smoke and Vape DZ, has refused to comment.
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:47.000] First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz, interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association conference, which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February 14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:03:01.000] You can find the interview at kietv.com. This is Rick Rodie with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[01:03:18.000 --> 01:03:26.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law, Rio, and we're talking to Dale in New York.
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:41.000] Okay, Dale, last question was, is it time to file criminal complaints? And the answer is, it's always time to file criminal complaints. And you're just a condit of complaints. And you finally have our grievances against the lawyer.
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:44.000] You mean the ADA?
[01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:47.000] Yeah, the ADA.
[01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:52.000] No, I'm not really sure what kind of charges to file against him.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:04:12.000] If the judge did something that was improper, according to the American Bar Association standards for the prosecution function, the ADA had a duty to inform the judge that he was screwing up. If he didn't, grieve him for it.
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:19.000] Actually, grieve him just for yucks. I once grieved a lawyer for Portney Farrell on the left.
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:28.000] Oh, he was furious and asked me why I did that, and I told him, well, if I'd have grieved you for what you've really done, that'd probably disbarge you.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:47.000] And shark, it doesn't matter what you grieve him for, has the same effect. Because no matter what you grieve them for, you're going to get a letter from the Bar Association saying that we examined into your accusation,
[01:04:47.000 --> 01:05:01.000] fine, it does not rise to the level of misconduct. It makes no difference why. But their insurance carrier knows that. So how do they gauge their level of risk?
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:08.000] By valid bar grievances? Heck, they throw them all in the trash, by the numbers.
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:18.000] One bar grievance, your first year of practice, they cancel your errors and emissions immediately. Two grievances, anyone you're a practice, they cancel if you've been practicing 20 years.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:30.000] Three, they'll cancel your law firm's malpractice insurance. And if you get three bar grievances against you, no law firm in their right mind will hire you.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:44.000] Those grievances go on their record and they never go away. For a lawyer, that is a big deal. And they do everything they can to keep you from knowing that.
[01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:55.000] You will never hear a lawyer mention grievance. Even if there's another lawyer that's acted absolutely outrageous, they will never mention grievance.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:07.000] Because they don't want the public to find out about them. Because they might get used against them. That is the biggest tool we have.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:10.000] Okay.
[01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:18.000] Sorry about the delay. I've got a sneeze button here. Okay. Anything else, Dale?
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:21.000] You've answered my questions right now.
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:28.000] Okay. Thank you. We've got a full board, so I kind of need to move along. Thank you and don't be a stranger.
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:31.000] No, I'll get a call again soon.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:39.000] Okay. Thank you. Now we're going to go to Ralph in Texas. Hello, Ralph. What do you have for us today?
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:49.000] Hello, Mr. Kelton. I have a couple of issues I'd like to discuss, but I'd like to say something first.
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:52.000] Okay.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:07:04.000] Okay. Have you ever seen these people who have these little stars on their car, on the window, usually be on the back glass and says, I support law enforcement?
[01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:06.000] Yes.
[01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:18.000] Okay. My neighbor has them on his driver's side window, up high. That way when he gets pulled over and he lowers his window, they're still showing.
[01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:34.000] Now, I've heard people say, you know, I've heard people say that law enforcement does not appreciate that and they like to get tickets to people that try to get by with tickets by saying that they support law enforcement.
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:51.000] Well, I would like to get merit badges for chief post complaints, ball grievances, conduct complaints, criminal complaints, and civil lawsuits.
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:08:00.000] Would somebody draw up some plans for that so I can stick them on the back glass of my car?
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:08.000] Okay. You want to kind of pick a fight with them?
[01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:21.000] Oh, no. I'm returning. I'm taking a fight with me. What I found out is that whenever they give you a ticket, if you get upset, they're like, well, what's wrong with you taking it personal?
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:30.000] But if you come back at them, they get real upset because they take it personal.
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:37.000] For years and without you guys, and now that I've been doing it with you guys, I've been learning a lot and doing it much, much better.
[01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:45.000] I say you guys and talk about real law radio, you and Eddie himself. So both of you are at the top.
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:56.000] But Eddie's a chump. Eddie gets no slack around here.
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:01.000] Well, if Eddie says I'm a chump, don't pay attention to it.
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:21.000] I started out listening to Eddie, then I listened to you and Eddie, then I was listening only to Eddie, and after I started in August of 2014, and it's taken me over three years to figure out what you're saying.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:34.000] And I'm fairly smart, but it's taken me that long because I was done how I wanted to attack them civilly, and I have a civil lawsuit going, and it's not going very well.
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:44.000] But I'm going to keep it alive, but I am starting to have fun with them with these criminal complaints.
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:48.000] Yeah, they really take those personal.
[01:09:48.000 --> 01:10:02.000] Oh, yeah. Well, I mean, I'm doing my part now. Okay, it's taken me a while, but this may be my life calling. I don't know, but I'm definitely doing it now, which is why I'm calling you.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:05.000] I'm talking about a couple of things.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:14.000] I want to do what I'm looking at and I've been working with Max. Max mentioned me a couple of times to you, but I've been working with Max and I've been kind of busy.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:23.000] So I'm plagiarizing Max's work, and I'm listening to you and Max talk, and I'm thinking, okay, well, why tell him what I want?
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:30.000] Just make a public information request and let them figure that. I really like that.
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:39.000] In fact, I had one law enforcement officer call me on the phone, and I told him, I can't give you legal advice.
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:49.000] And he called me back on the phone an hour and a half later, and I didn't even return the call. I sent him an email telling him, hey, you know, what's your problem?
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:55.000] You know, go ahead and I'll get in the routine. You know, I don't give legal advice. If you have a problem, then ask somebody else.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:02.000] I don't remember the details, but it was something like, I don't think I said talk to the legislature. I'll do that next time or more than that.
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:17.000] It takes some good stuff to really get in the face of psychopaths to get in your face. But when you know things that I don't know, that they don't know, then it makes it a little bit easier.
[01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:18.000] Yeah, it does.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:32.000] I'm thinking I want to do right now is I have put out several public information requests and I had some responses that were inadequate and I had some that didn't respond at all.
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:41.000] And I listened to you last night when you were talking to Max and I'm saying to him, wait a minute, I'm still comforting him because that's not my only thing I'm doing right now.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:51.000] So I'm still working on comprehending all that. So if municipal officers are nowhere authorized, they issue traffic violations.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:12:01.000] And I go in there with public information request asking for their, what's it called, I'm sorry.
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:12.000] Well, for a municipal officer, I asked for their specific authorization to enforce the commercial transportation code.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:23.000] Okay, but there's no place for them to do that. So if they're not going to respond, wouldn't that be considered shielding?
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:31.000] It would be considered, well, no, they have to respond one way or another.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:43.000] They have to either provide you with the information you asked for or respond by stating that they have no records responsive to your request and failing to respond at all.
[01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:46.000] That's violation of the act.
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:51.000] And the open records law is not a civil statute.
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:13:00.000] Violation of the acts, official misconduct, class A misdemeanor.
[01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:02.000] Right?
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:15.000] So if I can get them, you know, I deliberately craft my complaints so that what I'm looking for is not clear.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:24.000] Because I want them, well, not that it's not clear, but it will make them wonder, what's this guy looking for?
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:26.000] And what's he after?
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:31.000] If I can coax them into asking me why I'm asking for this?
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:35.000] 911.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:39.000] Most of them don't know that.
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:50.000] The only request they can make of the requester is to determine his identity and the record sought.
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:52.000] That's it.
[01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:56.000] They asked me why I want to see the record just violation of the act, class A misdemeanor.
[01:13:56.000 --> 01:13:57.000] Gotcha.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:13:58.000] 911?
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:00.000] Yes.
[01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:06.000] If I can coax them into doing something and they don't see it coming.
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:11.000] That all of a sudden you're trying to get them arrested and they don't see it coming.
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:17.000] Randall County, Amarillo, I asked to see some records.
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:22.000] He said I have to look at the computer and I wanted to see the physical record.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:24.000] He refused.
[01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:27.000] I called the bailiff over and asked him to arrest her.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:30.000] She did not see that coming.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:33.000] She expected me to give her legal advice.
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:37.000] Oh, I got these rights and you're supposed to do this?
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:39.000] No, I don't do that.
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:43.000] Instead of giving legal advice, I got this little tar baby.
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:46.000] She got this little invisible tar baby here.
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:47.000] You want to touch it?
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:48.000] Go ahead.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:49.000] Touch it.
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:58.000] The way I get to touch my little tar baby is I ask them to do something that I do not want them to do.
[01:14:58.000 --> 01:14:59.000] It's one of my rules.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:05.000] Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do.
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:14.000] Because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does not compel them to do.
[01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:18.000] So when they don't do it, you touch the tar baby, gotcha.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:22.000] Then I don't give them legal advice.
[01:15:22.000 --> 01:15:24.000] I don't tell them what my rights are.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:27.000] I don't tell them what their duties are.
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:30.000] They have a duty to know what it is already.
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:38.000] And if they want legal advice, well, they can go get the prosecutor and attorney and I'm sure he'll tell them how bad they screwed up.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:40.000] But I'm not going to tell them.
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:45.000] I'm going to go tell somebody else when I'm asking somebody else to arrest them.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:57.000] And let them call and find out why I'm trying to arrest them, get them arrested instead of explaining it to me.
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:01.000] They get to explain it to somebody who's investigating criminal accusations against them.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:03.000] That is so much more fun.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:09.000] Okay, you don't get the immediate gratification.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:14.000] You don't get to stand there and tell them how the cow ate the cabbage.
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:17.000] There's another gratification you get.
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:23.000] I was in Johnson County, came to see the morning hearings at the jail.
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:29.000] They wouldn't let me see it because it was being held deep in the jail and I'd be a security risk.
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:31.000] I said, well, hold us somewhere else.
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:35.000] And the justice and the peace refused to.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:37.000] So I'm about to go to break.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:39.000] I'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:41.000] This was so much fun.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:44.000] And the gratification of how powerful this truly is.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:50.000] Randy Kelton, Real Vareo, a call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:53.000] We'll be right back.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:17:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:14.600] Michael Miras has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.600 --> 01:17:19.400] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.400 --> 01:17:25.160] civil rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer
[01:17:25.160 --> 01:17:29.720] letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the
[01:17:29.720 --> 01:17:35.720] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Miras proven method is
[01:17:35.720 --> 01:17:41.000] the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:46.680] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Miras banner
[01:17:46.680 --> 01:17:56.120] or email michaelmiras at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[01:17:56.120 --> 01:18:02.280] at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love logos. Without the shows on this
[01:18:02.280 --> 01:18:06.760] network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's
[01:18:06.760 --> 01:18:12.440] no going back. I need my truth spit. I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this
[01:18:12.440 --> 01:18:16.600] network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a luddite and I
[01:18:16.600 --> 01:18:22.200] really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.200 --> 01:18:27.240] Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:27.240 --> 01:18:32.120] With ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies. Now,
[01:18:32.120 --> 01:18:39.080] go to logosradionetwork.com. Get on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything
[01:18:39.080 --> 01:18:45.560] from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do
[01:18:45.560 --> 01:18:52.040] anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving
[01:18:52.040 --> 01:18:57.960] without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are
[01:18:57.960 --> 01:19:08.200] welcome. Happy holidays, logos. This is the logos, logos, radio, net, radio, net, radio,
[01:19:15.400 --> 01:19:17.000] ain't gonna fly me.
[01:19:17.000 --> 01:19:27.560] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio and we're talking to Ralph in Texas.
[01:19:29.960 --> 01:19:35.640] Oh, okay. I got busy on the break and forgot where I was at.
[01:19:35.640 --> 01:19:45.720] You were talking about how we want to talk to them or want to treat them
[01:19:46.440 --> 01:19:55.400] and how they treat us. That's what I was hearing. We want to rationalize things,
[01:19:55.400 --> 01:20:00.200] but they're not rational people. We can't give them notice. Say, if you do that, I'm
[01:20:00.200 --> 01:20:07.560] going to sue you. It means nothing to them. These are people that Eddie says they're never
[01:20:07.560 --> 01:20:12.440] going to give up. They're never going to stop. We have to never stop. We just have to do what
[01:20:12.440 --> 01:20:18.520] we have to do. I have an amount of freedom. One of your favorite things or one of your
[01:20:18.520 --> 01:20:25.000] many things is, hey, some people take offense to being called a criminal. When I heard you say that
[01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:30.600] first time, I was thinking, yeah, that's me. I take a personal offense to being called a criminal.
[01:20:31.160 --> 01:20:35.720] I am not a criminal. Don't call me a criminal because if you come and call me a criminal and
[01:20:35.720 --> 01:20:41.080] then make me a criminal, you're going to know me for the rest of your life. That's one of the reasons
[01:20:41.080 --> 01:20:46.600] I see these people is because I'm like, you want to know who I am? You have no reason to know who
[01:20:46.600 --> 01:20:50.200] I am, but if you want to know who I am, you're going to find out who I am and you're going to
[01:20:50.200 --> 01:20:55.560] know me for the rest of your life. Yeah, you're not going to forget who I am. That's what we
[01:20:55.560 --> 01:21:00.600] need. This is how we're going to fix this system. We don't need everybody to do this.
[01:21:02.600 --> 01:21:08.760] Most people are busy. They got lots of things going on. They got kids. They got two cars.
[01:21:08.760 --> 01:21:15.240] They got a house payment. They're struggling. They don't have time to do what I'm doing.
[01:21:15.240 --> 01:21:22.920] I'm an older guy. My house is paid for. I don't have any debt. My car is paid for as long as it
[01:21:22.920 --> 01:21:33.080] keeps running. My kids are grown. I have fulfilled my contract with life. Now I get to do what I want
[01:21:33.080 --> 01:21:41.320] to and I have a contract where one contract is not fulfilled and that's the one I made with the
[01:21:41.320 --> 01:21:48.120] government when I joined the military. I would protect this country from all enemies foreign
[01:21:48.120 --> 01:21:57.560] and domestic. I found an enemy. The enemy is domestic and the fight's on. So I get to do that
[01:21:57.560 --> 01:22:02.920] fight, but not everybody has to do that. So if I'm going to do this fight, I want to do it well.
[01:22:02.920 --> 01:22:11.640] Well, if we had just one or two people in every county hammering these guys, their behavior should
[01:22:11.640 --> 01:22:18.440] begin to change. And they already are. In the counties I work in, they're changing.
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:29.160] My ticket site, I've probably had 50 people use it. I don't promote it at all. And I had a guy in
[01:22:29.160 --> 01:22:34.440] Houston that got his third DUI and he's talking to his lawyer and he and the guy asked him,
[01:22:34.440 --> 01:22:39.400] can't we follow a subject matter jurisdiction challenge? And the lawyer said, yeah, there's
[01:22:39.400 --> 01:22:45.720] some guy out there with a ticket site that keeps filing these subject matter jurisdiction challenges.
[01:22:46.840 --> 01:22:52.600] And the guy reached in his case and pulled out one. He said, like this, yeah, that's it. That's
[01:22:52.600 --> 01:23:02.120] it. This guy, this guy didn't do traffic, but he knew about it. You start hammering these guys,
[01:23:02.120 --> 01:23:12.040] everybody finds out about it. And a couple of them in Houston won. James Kuhn is a good example.
[01:23:12.040 --> 01:23:18.600] They came after him and he called in the show for a while and we helped him go back after them.
[01:23:18.600 --> 01:23:22.200] They came after him criminally. He went after them criminally. He wound up getting everything
[01:23:22.200 --> 01:23:32.280] thrown out. Now he's filing action. He's pursuing actions against them. So it works. And this is,
[01:23:32.280 --> 01:23:37.640] I forget the name of the county, it's just north of Houston. They're not ever going to want to go
[01:23:37.640 --> 01:23:44.840] to that place again. Once they've been through this once, they'll fight you and they won't back up.
[01:23:44.840 --> 01:23:51.080] But that's part of why we, over time, we've developed this method the way we have.
[01:23:53.080 --> 01:23:57.240] Whatever they're doing, it gets them in trouble. If you call them on it, they'll do it harder.
[01:23:58.920 --> 01:24:05.800] Okay. We understand what they're going to do. It's kind of like when you're hunting,
[01:24:05.800 --> 01:24:12.920] if you're hunting a critter, you know how that critter behaves. So you conduct yourself so
[01:24:12.920 --> 01:24:17.800] you move the critter into the spot you want it. Well, these are similar critters. We know how
[01:24:17.800 --> 01:24:23.640] they're going to behave. We know that if we go after one of them, the rest of them will try to
[01:24:23.640 --> 01:24:31.160] protect him. Okay. So how can we turn that back on them? We take the guy who tries to protect the
[01:24:31.160 --> 01:24:37.960] first one and then we go after him. And we forget about the first one. And then the third one tries
[01:24:37.960 --> 01:24:43.880] to protect the second one. We go after him. And it just keeps escalating and escalating.
[01:24:44.760 --> 01:24:51.880] Makes them all crazy. And once you've done it a time or two, the only real problem with it is
[01:24:53.400 --> 01:25:01.480] it used to be way too much fun. How you're doing with it, Ralph? Are you having to be
[01:25:01.480 --> 01:25:10.760] careful not to pick fights? I do. I'm still making that mistake. I made that mistake.
[01:25:10.760 --> 01:25:16.520] And I don't know what's going to happen with this civil lawsuit, but I did. I made that mistake.
[01:25:16.520 --> 01:25:21.480] I make a lot of mistakes. And I don't mind admitting it. And I don't mind helping people if I can.
[01:25:21.480 --> 01:25:27.400] Well, what I'm saying about picking fights, it gets so much fun because you're used to being
[01:25:27.400 --> 01:25:34.280] the one defending. When you're the one that picked the fight, oh, that's a lot more fun.
[01:25:34.280 --> 01:25:40.520] The problem with picking fights, you can pick more than you can get to. It is so easy to pick
[01:25:40.520 --> 01:25:48.120] a fight with them. And they are incredibly accommodating. And we don't have enough people
[01:25:48.120 --> 01:25:55.400] beating them up to force them to get smarter. But, you know, the last thing you said, that's
[01:25:55.400 --> 01:26:00.440] pretty amazing because here's what I was thinking while I was listening just, you know, an hour
[01:26:00.440 --> 01:26:09.480] ago is that they all, they have a routine and they all do the same thing. And they are so arrogant.
[01:26:09.480 --> 01:26:15.240] And so, I don't know, whatever the other word is, I can't think of it now. But they're so arrogant
[01:26:15.240 --> 01:26:21.960] that they cannot comprehend that anyone's a masses is going to stand up against them. So when we do
[01:26:21.960 --> 01:26:27.880] something, it's like, it's a shock to their senses, you know. And so, they take it personal.
[01:26:27.880 --> 01:26:34.680] And while it does spread, and they do talk about it amongst themselves, and I've heard you say
[01:26:34.680 --> 01:26:41.000] that, and that's true. But when you first do it, it's a shock to their senses. Because I just got
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:48.200] another ticket. And as careful as I am and as responsible as I am, there's no way. There is no
[01:26:48.200 --> 01:26:56.120] way that you can avoid every traffic citation. And that's why they write them the way they do.
[01:26:56.120 --> 01:27:00.840] Because they know that you can't do that. They know you can't live that way. You're not hurting
[01:27:00.840 --> 01:27:07.640] anyone. All you're doing is upsetting their rule system, which their rule system was created
[01:27:07.640 --> 01:27:16.360] to make them money. So I got two tickets recently and I'm dealing with that. But when I went in
[01:27:16.360 --> 01:27:24.840] to make my special appearance, the judge knew who I was. She's talking to the court court and she's
[01:27:24.840 --> 01:27:29.000] like, yeah, I'm familiar with it, you know. And I'm like, he's got little things slipped, you know.
[01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:36.600] And she got the folder out. And I saw a copy of the citation. She laid it on the table. And I said,
[01:27:36.600 --> 01:27:45.000] can I see that? It had blue writing on it, blue ink, handwritten ink notes on it. And I said, can I
[01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:53.240] look at that? She says, no, that's my copy. You have your own copy. You say, no, I need to see that
[01:27:53.240 --> 01:28:03.720] to make sure there aren't any inappropriate notations that would bias the court. That is my second
[01:28:03.720 --> 01:28:10.200] conduct complaint. I just filed my first one. That will be my second one. And I'm planning a third
[01:28:10.200 --> 01:28:20.200] one already. The court clerk notarized my paper and then said, no, you know, your paper was wrong.
[01:28:20.200 --> 01:28:27.240] I had the wrong counting on it. And next time I'll leave the county blank. No, just okay. Here's the deal.
[01:28:27.240 --> 01:28:34.440] Anything handwritten on a legal document takes precedence over anything printed on the legal
[01:28:34.440 --> 01:28:41.080] document. Scratch through it right to right county initially. Here you go. I told her that and she
[01:28:41.080 --> 01:28:49.720] wouldn't take it. She said no. So I'll do it. 9-1-1. I love to call 9-1-1 on clerks. They never see
[01:28:49.720 --> 01:28:59.080] that coming. Arlington, Texas. I want to see these criminal files. And she said, are you an attorney?
[01:28:59.080 --> 01:29:06.440] No, no, I'm not an attorney. Are you the accused? No, no, I'm not the accused. Well, then you can't see
[01:29:06.440 --> 01:29:13.160] those. Oh, I can't see those? No. I pointed to the bailiff who's across the room. Yeah, come here.
[01:29:15.160 --> 01:29:20.440] He come over and he's already mad because I summoned him. I need you to arrest her.
[01:29:21.800 --> 01:29:25.960] Why would I arrest her? She wouldn't show me some files, some criminal files. He said, well,
[01:29:25.960 --> 01:29:31.080] are you the accused? No. Are you an attorney? No, well, you can't see them. Oh, man, you shouldn't
[01:29:31.080 --> 01:29:37.880] have said that. They got my cell phone. He said, you can't use the cell phone in here. I said,
[01:29:37.880 --> 01:29:43.720] are you going to interfere with a 9-1-1 call? And the clerk said, well, just leave him alone.
[01:29:43.720 --> 01:29:47.960] He's just trying to get you to do something so he can charge you with something. I said,
[01:29:47.960 --> 01:29:53.080] she's smart. You should listen to her. I dialed 9-1-1 asking to send somebody out to arrest both
[01:29:53.080 --> 01:29:59.160] of them. This was in Arlington, Texas, between Dallas and Fort Worth. That works.
[01:30:00.760 --> 01:30:05.640] Drug smugglers have tried everything from submarines to catapults to get illegal drugs
[01:30:05.640 --> 01:30:10.600] into the US, but their most recent method was so ingenious it only cost them a quarter of
[01:30:10.600 --> 01:30:14.440] shipment. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back to tell you what it was.
[01:30:15.480 --> 01:30:21.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:25.800] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.800 --> 01:30:31.880] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:31.880 --> 01:30:37.080] it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.080 --> 01:30:43.080] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.280 --> 01:30:49.000] Mexican drug smugglers are always brainstorming new ways to outsmart the border patrol,
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:53.640] but their recent exploits were the stuff of legend. The traffickers tunneled their way
[01:30:53.640 --> 01:30:59.400] underground to 16-metered parking spaces in Nogales, Arizona, and cut careful rectangles
[01:30:59.400 --> 01:31:05.320] in the pavement. US accomplices then parked false bottom cars above the holes, fed the parking
[01:31:05.320 --> 01:31:10.520] meter, and stuffed the cars with drugs from below. Once the pavement plugs were back in place,
[01:31:10.520 --> 01:31:16.120] the vehicles would cruise quietly away with nobody the wiser. Eventually, diligent deputies
[01:31:16.120 --> 01:31:21.560] detained the digging desperados, and that was the end of drive-thru drugs. I'm Dr. Catherine
[01:31:21.560 --> 01:31:25.080] Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.600 --> 01:31:36.040] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.040 --> 01:31:41.560] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:31:41.560 --> 01:31:45.880] it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives,
[01:31:45.880 --> 01:31:50.200] and thousands of my fellow force responders have died. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a
[01:31:50.200 --> 01:31:54.120] structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I am a father
[01:31:54.120 --> 01:32:00.360] who lost his son. We are Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.120 --> 01:32:06.120] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Similar. In today's America,
[01:32:06.120 --> 01:32:09.480] we live in an us against them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free
[01:32:09.480 --> 01:32:13.640] society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are
[01:32:13.640 --> 01:32:17.240] the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:17.240 --> 01:32:21.800] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[01:32:21.800 --> 01:32:26.200] opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's
[01:32:26.200 --> 01:32:30.200] Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive
[01:32:30.200 --> 01:32:34.040] teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold
[01:32:34.040 --> 01:32:37.800] courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going
[01:32:37.800 --> 01:32:42.280] to RuleofLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of
[01:32:42.280 --> 01:32:46.200] Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Life, video and audio of the
[01:32:46.200 --> 01:32:50.680] original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.680 --> 01:32:54.600] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[01:32:54.600 --> 01:32:58.680] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:58.680 --> 01:33:07.800] Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:07.800 --> 01:33:29.640] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking Ralph in Texas.
[01:33:31.240 --> 01:33:37.320] Okay, Ralph, where were we? And running off the cliff is fun when you have a constitution as
[01:33:37.320 --> 01:33:45.720] a parachute. Well, as long as Deborah's not here, don't catch me. I get too excited. This is my
[01:33:45.720 --> 01:33:52.280] favorite subject, and I get too excited with it sometimes. But if we can get more people to
[01:33:52.280 --> 01:34:01.560] understand that this is not burdensome, and it's not dangerous, the hardest thing to get over,
[01:34:01.560 --> 01:34:08.120] you know, we're used to being having criminal charges filed against us. So when we think about
[01:34:08.840 --> 01:34:17.400] criminal charges, we naturally recoil from them. And we do that until the first time we file one.
[01:34:19.400 --> 01:34:25.720] And then everything changes. And like I told the mayor in Cumbie, Texas,
[01:34:25.720 --> 01:34:32.520] I asked her to get security in because she had called the prosecuting attorney, and I told her I
[01:34:32.520 --> 01:34:38.200] didn't want to talk to the prosecuting attorneys because they always get excited. So if you're
[01:34:38.200 --> 01:34:45.880] going to call the prosecuting attorney, I need security in here. So she called in this policeman,
[01:34:45.880 --> 01:34:53.080] and I told her, you know what, when I asked the officer to arrest the prosecuting attorney,
[01:34:53.080 --> 01:34:57.960] you get to see him do this little kicking dance. And that's where he shifts from one foot to the
[01:34:57.960 --> 01:35:05.000] other trying to talk me out of it. So I got to that point, and I asked the officer, I need you
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:13.560] to arrest the prosecuting attorney here and the mayor. The mayor's face was priceless. They wouldn't
[01:35:13.560 --> 01:35:21.000] let me file a stack of criminal documents in the court record. And I had actually driven
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:27.400] 600 miles from Tennessee to file those documents. And they wouldn't let me file them. So I asked
[01:35:27.400 --> 01:35:33.080] the officer to arrest them both. And he starts shifting from one foot to the other. And I looked
[01:35:33.080 --> 01:35:39.960] over at the mayor and grinned at her and pointed at the officer. She did not find the humor in it.
[01:35:42.680 --> 01:35:50.120] No, the answer was turning the yellow. Yeah, it does get to be a lot more fun.
[01:35:50.120 --> 01:35:58.120] And, you know, I never do this maliciously. I never want these guys arrested and indicted.
[01:35:59.400 --> 01:36:07.720] They're my public officials. I think of them like I do my grandkids. I love my grandkids dearly.
[01:36:08.760 --> 01:36:15.240] But if one of them runs out the road, well, I'm fixing to tan his hide. And that's the
[01:36:15.240 --> 01:36:19.720] perspective I do this from. The way we're going to fix this system is not by being angry at our
[01:36:19.720 --> 01:36:27.800] public officials. We'll fix this system by rendering to our public officials the same
[01:36:27.800 --> 01:36:39.000] service we ask them to render to us. We hire our policemen to protect us from our own distraction
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:46.280] and our own excesses. I once pulled up to a road where, where I was at, we had a bunch of us out
[01:36:46.280 --> 01:36:52.520] in the country. This is one lane blackout roads. One spot it came to achieve and there's a stop sign
[01:36:52.520 --> 01:36:59.240] there. Two o'clock in the morning, I'm pulling up to this and every night I would pass this thing
[01:36:59.240 --> 01:37:03.320] and have to stop here. But I didn't dare go through it because I was sure it was going to be a share
[01:37:03.320 --> 01:37:09.080] step. He's sitting over there waiting to mail me. And it always irritated me because I didn't see
[01:37:09.080 --> 01:37:13.720] any reason for the stop sign to be in this particular place. I pulled up there one day
[01:37:13.720 --> 01:37:20.040] and stopped. I looked to my right, to my left, looked to my right and started to pull out in
[01:37:20.040 --> 01:37:28.760] this rock truck blasted past me from the right. What on earth? I got out of the car and walked
[01:37:28.760 --> 01:37:34.760] out in the road. The black top road went down about 100 feet and then it turned back slightly.
[01:37:35.720 --> 01:37:40.760] When I looked down the road, I could see the road and it looked like it just got smaller. I
[01:37:40.760 --> 01:37:46.840] couldn't tell that it shifted over a little bit and it hid that lane from me. I would have pulled
[01:37:46.840 --> 01:37:55.240] right up in front of that guy. I'd have died right there. That stop sign was there to protect me
[01:37:55.960 --> 01:38:00.680] from a danger that was not readily apparent.
[01:38:00.680 --> 01:38:10.600] It gave me a different perspective. We asked our police to protect us from our own distraction
[01:38:12.040 --> 01:38:18.280] and then we don't repay the favor. So I never go after them out of anger or avarice.
[01:38:19.560 --> 01:38:25.320] I just want to protect them the same way they protect us. Hey, I'm giving you this ticket.
[01:38:25.320 --> 01:38:32.680] Nothing personal. Hey, I'm trying to get you arrested, but nothing personal. How does that
[01:38:32.680 --> 01:38:40.840] work for you, Bubba? You are unique. It takes practice to do that. I mean, I'm still angry,
[01:38:40.840 --> 01:38:47.720] you know. I would like to think I could be like that one day, but right now I'm still angry. I
[01:38:47.720 --> 01:38:57.240] mean, I don't show possible. Okay, they count on that. They use that against you. They count on
[01:38:57.240 --> 01:39:07.720] you being angry. When they can't get you angry, it makes them crazy. Judge Wright, Lake Worth,
[01:39:07.720 --> 01:39:13.960] Texas. I see some records. The clerks give me a hard time. They finally get them. I'm here looking
[01:39:13.960 --> 01:39:18.920] at them. The judge comes out. She's on the backside of this bottom proof glass. Mr. Kelton,
[01:39:18.920 --> 01:39:24.520] she knew me really well. Mr. Kelton, you can't look at those. You are a security risk.
[01:39:25.400 --> 01:39:30.040] Oh, me? I'm a security risk? Yes, Mr. Kelton, you are. And I can't look at these. No, you can't.
[01:39:30.040 --> 01:39:35.720] I closed the folder, slid it under the glass. The bailiff had come up on the other side of
[01:39:35.720 --> 01:39:42.440] the glass right next to me. I said, Mr. Bailiff, did you hear that? Yes, Mr. Kelton, I did. Arrest
[01:39:42.440 --> 01:39:50.040] that woman. Why can't arrest her? This is her court. Oh, Mr. Bailiff, you are mistaken. This is not
[01:39:50.040 --> 01:39:56.360] her court. This is my court. And I very generously allow her to administer it according to my law.
[01:39:56.360 --> 01:40:03.080] And she just violated one of them. Arrest her. Oh, Mr. Kelton, I have to administer the court.
[01:40:03.080 --> 01:40:09.080] Let me take you down to my boss. That'll work. Take you down to his boss, the elected constable.
[01:40:09.080 --> 01:40:14.680] He introduced me to him. And the constable said, what can I do for you, Mr. Kelton? I need you
[01:40:14.680 --> 01:40:20.680] to arrest him, the bailiff. Well, how would I arrest him? Because he won't take his chicken suit off.
[01:40:22.360 --> 01:40:28.440] Well, what does that mean? Well, he wouldn't arrest the judge. And the bailiff looked at him and said,
[01:40:29.240 --> 01:40:32.600] is that true? You wouldn't arrest the judge? That's true. I wouldn't arrest the judge.
[01:40:32.600 --> 01:40:40.680] So the constable said to me, so, well, I'm not going to arrest the bailiff. We're constables. We
[01:40:40.680 --> 01:40:48.040] don't do that. Oh, you don't do that. I see you're wearing a pistol. He says, are you a certified
[01:40:48.040 --> 01:40:52.760] peace officer? He says, yes, I am. Well, you have a duty on Article 2.13 Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:40:53.720 --> 01:40:59.960] to arrest and keep to peace. Arrest all offenders. Take them for a magistrate. Arrest him. Take
[01:40:59.960 --> 01:41:05.640] him for a magistrate. Oh, we don't do that. Oh, okay. Don't you have a Sheriff's Department
[01:41:05.640 --> 01:41:11.080] around here somewhere? And they had an outlying office right across the street. I already knew
[01:41:11.080 --> 01:41:17.320] that. Hey, yes, right across the street. Okay, thank you. I go across. Ask for an officer to arrest
[01:41:17.320 --> 01:41:23.000] the constable. And they said, well, the captain just left. We'll get him back. I said, okay.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:29.000] And then the constable shows up. And he said, Mr. Kelton, if you want me to, I will take your
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:36.120] complaints to the prosecuting attorney. Oh, no, no, no. I'll get to the prosecuting attorney, but
[01:41:36.680 --> 01:41:43.000] I haven't got everybody to touch my tar baby yet. He said, you're what? I said, I got this little
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:50.120] invisible tar baby. And the judge touched it and your bailiff touched it and you touched it.
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:54.760] Now I need to get the Sheriff's Department to touch it. Then I'll go to the prosecuting attorney.
[01:41:54.760 --> 01:42:02.200] About that time, the captain comes here and he says, what can I do for you, Mr. Kelton? I need
[01:42:02.200 --> 01:42:07.560] you to arrest the constable here. And the constable looked at him, just kind of held up his
[01:42:07.560 --> 01:42:13.400] hands, shrugged his shoulders. You know, what can I do? Well, why would I arrest the constable?
[01:42:13.400 --> 01:42:18.360] Because he won't take a chicken suit off. What does that mean? Well, he wouldn't arrest his
[01:42:19.080 --> 01:42:22.600] bailiff. Well, why would he arrest the bailiff? Because he wouldn't arrest the judge.
[01:42:22.600 --> 01:42:27.000] And the captain said, well, I'm not going to take much. You can suit off either.
[01:42:28.840 --> 01:42:37.880] Chicken suit works well. I always ask them to take their chicken suit off.
[01:42:40.040 --> 01:42:47.400] Ken Magnuson, his brother's the, was the city attorney for the city of Mansfield. Ken called me,
[01:42:47.400 --> 01:42:52.840] what were you doing in Mansfield yesterday, minding my business, Ken? Well, that officer
[01:42:52.840 --> 01:43:00.280] told my brother that you were agitated. I said, Kim, ask Craig to ask that officer if I got
[01:43:00.280 --> 01:43:07.640] agitated before I asked him to take his chicken suit off or after. He said, you said that to him?
[01:43:07.640 --> 01:43:15.000] I always say that to them. I'm always thinking, what will play well before a grand jury of my
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:23.560] peers. Call me agitated. See how that works for you. Hang on, we're about to go to break.
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:31.960] Do we have any more issues for you, Ralph? No, I just like to say that in the last couple
[01:43:31.960 --> 01:43:36.760] months I've listened to you and I've got more information that I can use on my appeal than
[01:43:36.760 --> 01:43:43.160] I ever would have imagined. Wonderful. That's good to hear because that's why,
[01:43:43.160 --> 01:43:48.120] that's why we're doing this show. Okay, hang on, go into break. We'll come back,
[01:43:48.120 --> 01:43:51.320] we're going to go to Latina from California. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.520 --> 01:44:06.440] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.440 --> 01:44:11.320] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.320 --> 01:44:17.560] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.560 --> 01:44:22.360] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:22.360 --> 01:44:28.520] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logo's radio network gets many requests to endorse
[01:44:28.520 --> 01:44:35.080] all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity so much. We became a
[01:44:35.080 --> 01:44:41.480] marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from Logos
[01:44:41.480 --> 01:44:48.600] Radio Network.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the
[01:44:48.600 --> 01:44:55.320] benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:44:55.320 --> 01:44:59.800] help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:44:59.800 --> 01:45:07.560] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.560 --> 01:45:14.040] the affordable, easy to understand, four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:45:14.040 --> 01:45:20.840] step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:45:20.840 --> 01:45:26.680] know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now
[01:45:26.680 --> 01:45:33.320] you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning
[01:45:33.320 --> 01:45:39.240] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:39.240 --> 01:45:45.640] the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom,
[01:45:45.640 --> 01:45:53.160] video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit
[01:45:53.160 --> 01:46:00.280] ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:23.160 --> 01:46:43.400] Okay, we are back. Randy Carlson, rule of law radio on this Friday, the 22nd day of March 2019,
[01:46:43.400 --> 01:46:49.960] and we're going to Tina in California. Hello, Tina. Hello, Randy. How are you tonight?
[01:46:49.960 --> 01:46:58.360] I am good. Oh, well, good. You're in fine fettle there talking to everybody. It's fun.
[01:46:59.240 --> 01:47:03.720] So, quick questions because I knew you've got a very busy evening. It's regarding that
[01:47:03.720 --> 01:47:09.800] declaratory judgment. I did all those changes you made, but then I was going through it
[01:47:10.520 --> 01:47:18.120] finally to make sure I was getting it right. I came across a couple of things that makes it,
[01:47:18.120 --> 01:47:23.480] you know, I don't want them to have anything to come back at me with. So,
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:30.760] is the wording, this case arises out of a wrongful foreclosure correct or should it read
[01:47:31.320 --> 01:47:36.520] petition instead of case? And do I leave the wrongful foreclosure part in?
[01:47:37.160 --> 01:47:42.520] I would leave the wrongful foreclosure out of it because this is a petition for
[01:47:42.520 --> 01:47:50.840] declaratory judgment. You're asking the court to rule on a point of law. For closure has
[01:47:50.840 --> 01:47:57.560] nothing to do with it. Any cases that may have occurred have nothing to do with it. Only the
[01:47:57.560 --> 01:48:04.920] rights at the parties. Right. Okay. That's what I wanted to make sure. Then second, it says,
[01:48:04.920 --> 01:48:10.680] because this was written by a paralegal for the first part of it, and then you made some great
[01:48:10.680 --> 01:48:17.560] corrections, which taught me a lot. And you can use, once I file this case, if you want to put it
[01:48:17.560 --> 01:48:24.280] on your website for anyone else to get help from and how to write them because I know I needed to
[01:48:24.280 --> 01:48:31.080] help, please do so as soon as I filed it because then it's public notice. But do I put petitioner,
[01:48:31.640 --> 01:48:37.800] do I leave this in or do they allude to a complaint, not a declaratory judgment? It says
[01:48:37.800 --> 01:48:45.800] petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraph 1315 as if fully
[01:48:45.800 --> 01:48:51.720] set forth. There it is. That's not, that should come out of there. You don't have any claims.
[01:48:52.760 --> 01:48:58.120] The paralegal, this is what I was saying about people not understanding
[01:48:59.080 --> 01:49:05.560] declaratory judgment suits. Yes. The declaratory judgment suit is not asked, there are no claims.
[01:49:05.560 --> 01:49:15.240] They're, you're asking for no harm. Yeah. And so they, when they write lawsuits, they always
[01:49:15.240 --> 01:49:20.440] write them in terms of causes of action. There are no causes of action in a declaratory judgment
[01:49:20.440 --> 01:49:25.640] suit. I'm insisting I had to have one and I knew you were going to say no, but I thought, well,
[01:49:25.640 --> 01:49:30.120] you know, I need the help to get this started. So I had to do it and that's why I came back
[01:49:30.120 --> 01:49:37.160] to you to make sure it was correct. So do I put, leave in an actual controversy,
[01:49:37.160 --> 01:49:41.320] has arisen and now exists between petitioner and respondent?
[01:49:42.680 --> 01:49:46.600] I'm actually trying to pull up your email now for some reason. I'm not finding it.
[01:49:47.480 --> 01:49:53.560] I need to look at the document. This is not, okay. What is the,
[01:49:53.560 --> 01:50:01.880] what are you asking the judge to rule on? I want them to rule that the note
[01:50:03.960 --> 01:50:13.400] that I entitled to the original note returned to me as per the California statute 2941.
[01:50:14.360 --> 01:50:21.160] Okay. Then any case that may have occurred has nothing to do with anything here. The question is,
[01:50:21.160 --> 01:50:33.720] when a person pays off a mortgage, does this, what's the code that requires them to return the note?
[01:50:35.080 --> 01:50:47.160] 2941. Does 2941 place a duty on the note holder to return the note to the lender,
[01:50:47.160 --> 01:50:54.440] to the borrower? That's the question. Whatever may have happened in the case has
[01:50:54.440 --> 01:51:00.600] nothing to do with anything. Do not bring any of that in there. The law says this,
[01:51:01.640 --> 01:51:04.280] does the law mean what it says?
[01:51:05.880 --> 01:51:10.840] Yeah. So I take out an actual controversy, has arisen and now exists between petitioners.
[01:51:10.840 --> 01:51:13.720] No controversy. No, no, no. Take that out.
[01:51:13.720 --> 01:51:19.080] Okay. That's the key part of a declaratory judgment.
[01:51:20.520 --> 01:51:29.000] The reason the legislature passed the declaratory judgment act was to allow people to determine
[01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:39.320] whether or not an actual controversy exists. If the court says no, this law does not require
[01:51:39.320 --> 01:51:45.480] the lender to return the note to the borrower, then there is no controversy.
[01:51:47.560 --> 01:51:53.960] And it ends the suit before the suit ever happened on a simple point of law. So you're
[01:51:53.960 --> 01:52:05.160] saying to the court, I believe I have a claim against this lender, but I'm not sure. My claim
[01:52:05.160 --> 01:52:13.160] is based on this statute. And you asked the court to say, does this statute mean precisely what it
[01:52:13.160 --> 01:52:21.800] says or does it mean something else? If they say it means something else, you don't have a case.
[01:52:23.320 --> 01:52:27.720] If they say it means what it says, now you have a case, now you can follow your controversy.
[01:52:27.720 --> 01:52:34.200] But the issue of whether or not this applies now becomes restruticata.
[01:52:36.440 --> 01:52:42.120] Yeah, this can no longer be argued. They may try to argue something else,
[01:52:42.120 --> 01:52:46.920] but they can't argue that they don't have a duty. Okay.
[01:52:48.600 --> 01:52:52.600] Sometimes it will allow you to win the case before you ever get it filed.
[01:52:52.600 --> 01:52:59.560] Yeah. Do I leave in where, wherefore petitioner prays for relief as followed,
[01:52:59.560 --> 01:53:03.880] or do I change it to petitioner prays for judgment as followed?
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:13.000] It doesn't matter. I would take relief out, but what no relief is good. Relief is in the form of
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:24.440] the ruling. That's really picking a little closer than we need to. You're asking the judge to give
[01:53:24.440 --> 01:53:32.200] you a ruling. You can call it relief. You can call it whatever you want to. At the end of the day,
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:40.280] the courts will not make those kinds of fine distinctions. Lawyers try to do it, but courts
[01:53:40.280 --> 01:53:50.200] don't. Yes. Okay. There's one more thing that I really need to ask you. We should put in here that
[01:53:53.960 --> 01:54:03.240] that I had paid off the note or attended, which I actually did in 2013. I'd attended the full
[01:54:03.240 --> 01:54:08.760] payment of the loan as per the amount they put on the notice of trustee sale. However,
[01:54:08.760 --> 01:54:17.320] they refused that and it was not paid off in full until they did the foreclosure
[01:54:18.360 --> 01:54:23.960] based on their forged documents and the interim that they got without my knowledge.
[01:54:25.240 --> 01:54:30.280] And it was more than paid off because they claimed so much more than was due,
[01:54:31.400 --> 01:54:37.400] but the statute doesn't delineate between the person who has to pay it off. It just says
[01:54:37.400 --> 01:54:43.720] satisfied. And it doesn't matter to my reading, that doesn't matter how it satisfies. Do I take out
[01:54:43.720 --> 01:54:50.520] this part that the paralegal put in on December 17, 2013, before the time of the last foreclosure
[01:54:50.520 --> 01:54:55.480] sale petitioner had attended full payment of the loan that CIT claimed was due.
[01:54:55.480 --> 01:54:57.560] They called that out. That's irrelevant.
[01:54:57.560 --> 01:55:00.920] Take all that out. It's irrelevant. That's what I was wondering. It's irrelevant. Okay.
[01:55:01.640 --> 01:55:07.080] Do I put in that the note was satisfied on the day of the foreclosure sale and just
[01:55:07.080 --> 01:55:13.560] leave it? That's irrelevant too. All of that's irrelevant. Whether a note was satisfied or not
[01:55:13.560 --> 01:55:17.640] satisfied is irrelevant. You're asking a legal question.
[01:55:18.760 --> 01:55:31.080] Yeah. Okay. When a note is satisfied, does 2941 require the lender to return the original note
[01:55:31.080 --> 01:55:40.600] to the borrower? That's it. Yeah. Whether a note was satisfied or not satisfied is irrelevant.
[01:55:41.800 --> 01:55:48.600] But I leave in the part where I say that the respondent claimed ownership of the loan
[01:55:48.600 --> 01:56:02.360] and by the way of the purported purchase and use the exhibit of the whatever it is, where they
[01:56:02.360 --> 01:56:06.600] transfer it. It's corporate assignment of deed of trust. So I leave that in there to show that
[01:56:06.600 --> 01:56:11.960] they claimed ownership. And I leave the letters in where I sent a request for the note and where
[01:56:11.960 --> 01:56:16.520] they sent one back saying, we will send you the note, but they never did.
[01:56:16.520 --> 01:56:22.520] Okay. That you leave in. And then they would just take out the...
[01:56:22.520 --> 01:56:27.400] You say there was a note. You put in evidence of the existence of a note.
[01:56:28.520 --> 01:56:35.160] The note was written to a certain person and then it was transferred to another entity.
[01:56:36.360 --> 01:56:42.520] And that entity subsequently issued a notice of satisfaction of the note.
[01:56:42.520 --> 01:56:55.080] Does this satisfaction of the note require the lender under 2941 to return the original note
[01:56:55.640 --> 01:57:02.200] to the borrower? That's the question. Yes. Okay. That's all that's needed in there.
[01:57:02.200 --> 01:57:06.920] How the note was satisfied is irrelevant. Just the fact that it was.
[01:57:06.920 --> 01:57:13.720] Do I leave in under the prayer, which comes at the end, you know, petition questions,
[01:57:13.720 --> 01:57:19.240] do I leave in the last part? Because she's put in for declaratory judgment. And you help me change
[01:57:19.240 --> 01:57:23.720] that. I'm put to a declaratory judgment that respondent failed to perform a duty that was
[01:57:23.720 --> 01:57:30.040] required by law. And for cost of petition, according to proof, then she put in enter
[01:57:30.040 --> 01:57:34.280] such other relief to which petitioner may be entitled as a matter of...
[01:57:34.280 --> 01:57:41.160] Absolutely not. Get that out of there. Get that out of there. Okay. I'm taking that.
[01:57:41.160 --> 01:57:48.920] Court will screw you big time. So do I take out for cost of petition, according to proof?
[01:57:49.560 --> 01:57:59.000] Absolutely. Take out costs. Take out relief. This is declared toward judgment. Ask for nothing
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:06.120] but a ruling on point of law. If the judge grants you one penny in relief, the other side can get
[01:58:06.120 --> 01:58:11.640] the declaratory judgment tossed. Okay. That's interesting to know.
[01:58:12.920 --> 01:58:19.560] Can he know relief in declaratory judgment? Okay. Well, then I need to take out petitioner
[01:58:19.560 --> 01:58:27.720] praise for relief then. Yes. Well, relief in the form of a ruling, but I wouldn't like relief.
[01:58:27.720 --> 01:58:34.840] I would like petitioner praise for a ruling as follows. Yeah, I like that better now. Yeah.
[01:58:35.880 --> 01:58:41.400] So then a petitioner request that the court rule that the respondent had a duty to return the
[01:58:41.400 --> 01:58:47.240] original note and the lunges in accordance with the law, California Civil Code section 2941.
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:55.800] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.800 --> 01:59:01.800] because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:01.800 --> 01:59:05.960] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.920 --> 01:59:13.400] Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.400 --> 01:59:19.480] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound
[01:59:19.480 --> 01:59:25.400] passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond
[01:59:25.400 --> 01:59:31.160] which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery
[01:59:31.160 --> 01:59:37.640] version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling
[01:59:37.640 --> 02:00:00.040] us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.