ROL_2019-03-18_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.720]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Low Star Lowdown, providing for jelly
[00:05.720 --> 00:13.440]  bulletins for the commodities market, today's history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.440 --> 00:21.240]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.240 --> 00:29.080]  Markets for Wazeva 6th of February 2019 opened with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce, silver $15.77
[00:29.080 --> 00:36.880]  an ounce, copper $2.83 an ounce, oil Texas crude $3.66 a barrel, brand crude $61.98 a
[00:36.880 --> 00:45.640]  barrel, and cryptos in order of market capitalization, bitcoin $3,401.64, Ripple XRP $0.29, Ethereum
[00:45.640 --> 00:50.600]  $10.10 and Eos is at $2.32 a crypto coin.
[00:50.600 --> 00:59.620]  Today in History, the year 1918, British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property
[00:59.620 --> 01:04.520]  qualifications get the right to vote when the Representation of the People Act of 1918
[01:04.520 --> 01:06.000]  was passed by Parliament.
[01:06.000 --> 01:13.640]  Today in History, in recent news, several Texas-based organizations filed a lawsuit today requesting
[01:13.640 --> 01:18.480]  that a federal court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally
[01:18.480 --> 01:19.840]  registered to vote.
[01:19.840 --> 01:24.640]  The list was compiled after an 11-month-long investigation by the Office of the Texas Secretary
[01:24.640 --> 01:30.000]  of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens
[01:30.000 --> 01:33.360]  who were registered to vote when obtaining age-arguage license.
[01:33.360 --> 01:37.040]  Over half of the 95,000 didn't devote, it seems.
[01:37.040 --> 01:41.080]  However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were
[01:41.080 --> 01:45.360]  not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:45.360 --> 01:50.880]  Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:50.880 --> 01:55.240]  Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond
[01:55.240 --> 01:57.040]  with proof of eligibility.
[01:57.040 --> 02:01.240]  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have
[02:01.240 --> 02:09.000]  yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[02:09.000 --> 02:14.400]  A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck after
[02:14.400 --> 02:16.920]  an artery, vape pen, exploded while he was using it.
[02:16.920 --> 02:20.640]  It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[02:20.640 --> 02:24.240]  An X-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem.
[02:24.240 --> 02:30.440]  The vape store, Smoke and Vape DZ, has refused to comment.
[02:30.440 --> 02:35.200]  First edition anchorwoman, Kristin Diaz, interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of
[02:35.200 --> 02:40.160]  Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
[02:40.160 --> 02:44.560]  Conference, which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February
[02:44.560 --> 02:47.480]  14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[02:47.480 --> 02:51.480]  You can find the interview at kiitv.com.
[02:51.480 --> 03:20.480]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[03:20.480 --> 03:45.960]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[03:45.960 --> 04:14.480]  I am going to go ahead and turn the phones on if anybody wants to call and get in line
[04:14.480 --> 04:16.920]  with an issue or question or anything like that.
[04:16.920 --> 04:20.160]  I don't have a lot to talk about to begin with tonight.
[04:20.160 --> 04:26.600]  Now one thing I would like to begin talking about though is that new title song to the
[04:26.600 --> 04:28.400]  show.
[04:28.400 --> 04:31.480]  This is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:31.480 --> 04:37.640]  Is it just me or is it getting to the point where you cannot even show your face in public
[04:37.640 --> 04:46.320]  without fear of encountering a cop who is going to kill you because you can't turn
[04:46.320 --> 04:52.680]  on the news, you can't go anywhere without reading a headline or seeing a video or some
[04:52.680 --> 04:57.440]  news conference or something where another cop has either attacked or killed another
[04:57.440 --> 05:01.240]  individual without cause.
[05:01.240 --> 05:07.320]  They always try to justify it but if you look at the rational facts of what is there, what
[05:07.320 --> 05:09.400]  they did cannot be justified.
[05:09.400 --> 05:16.120]  It would not be justifiable for you and I, therefore it is not justifiable for them.
[05:16.120 --> 05:21.680]  The fact that they are on the job does not give them the indiscriminate right to kill
[05:21.680 --> 05:27.600]  anybody they want to and then excuse it through any means they want to.
[05:27.600 --> 05:34.160]  But they are doing it and the courts are helping them do it.
[05:34.160 --> 05:39.560]  The courts have replaced the bill of rights with public policy.
[05:39.560 --> 05:47.680]  More specific department policy as to what these officers can and cannot do.
[05:47.680 --> 05:53.080]  If the department policy doesn't specifically prohibit them from murdering you then that
[05:53.080 --> 05:58.520]  is law enough according to the courts to not hold the officer accountable because he didn't
[05:58.520 --> 06:04.000]  actually break any policy.
[06:04.000 --> 06:08.840]  That's getting a little far off the reservation from my liking as to what we created government
[06:08.840 --> 06:09.840]  to do.
[06:09.840 --> 06:15.800]  But then again, I'm just one guy.
[06:15.800 --> 06:19.440]  Maybe I'm the one that's sitting there wrong for thinking what they're doing is wrong and
[06:19.440 --> 06:25.920]  what those that are protecting them is doing is wrong or are doing is wrong.
[06:25.920 --> 06:28.960]  But you have to forgive me, I'm a little bit tired today.
[06:28.960 --> 06:33.240]  I got up early, I've been doing spring cleaning all day today.
[06:33.240 --> 06:36.440]  This place was an absolute mess, as small as it is you wouldn't think it could be this
[06:36.440 --> 06:39.040]  big a mess but it's gotten that way.
[06:39.040 --> 06:44.000]  I didn't realize just how much my dog actually shed until I got to moving stuff around and
[06:44.000 --> 06:49.160]  found one of my tool bags sitting in a corner with enough dog fur attached to it that I
[06:49.160 --> 06:53.880]  could have just put a collar on it and give it a name and been just as well off.
[06:53.880 --> 06:58.880]  I mean it was bad and I have had to shuffle around.
[06:58.880 --> 07:03.400]  My place is small enough that it works very much like that old tile game where you had
[07:03.400 --> 07:09.520]  to slide a bunch of tiles up or down and left and right in order to make a move with another
[07:09.520 --> 07:12.440]  tile to get it in the position it was supposed to be in and then figure out how to get the
[07:12.440 --> 07:13.960]  rest up in the same way.
[07:13.960 --> 07:18.040]  That's exactly what rearranging anything in this place is like.
[07:18.040 --> 07:19.680]  That's exactly what it's like.
[07:19.680 --> 07:25.520]  So it takes five moves to do one thing in this place and it's taking me all day to get
[07:25.520 --> 07:27.320]  through it to where I'm at.
[07:27.320 --> 07:32.880]  I had not sat down until right now to do this show from the time I've got up today.
[07:32.880 --> 07:36.720]  So please forgive me if I sound a little bit tired and I'm off on anything because that's
[07:36.720 --> 07:37.720]  going to be why.
[07:37.720 --> 07:41.920]  I am beat to the socks but I'm here nonetheless.
[07:41.920 --> 07:47.200]  That being said, along with all the stuff that's going wrong in our society, remember
[07:47.200 --> 07:54.920]  who is trying to bring you the information that at least explains to you where to find
[07:54.920 --> 08:01.200]  remedy for some of the things they do and that is us and that we can't remain on the
[08:01.200 --> 08:07.400]  air without you folks out there helping us by supporting us with donations and funding
[08:07.400 --> 08:09.840]  and whatever means you can.
[08:09.840 --> 08:14.520]  That's what keeps us alive and functioning and I mean that in a very literal sense.
[08:14.520 --> 08:16.920]  The donations is what feeds us.
[08:16.920 --> 08:18.920]  It's what pays the light bill.
[08:18.920 --> 08:22.280]  It's what makes this network possible.
[08:22.280 --> 08:25.520]  So without you, we're not here.
[08:25.520 --> 08:26.840]  Just keep that in mind.
[08:26.840 --> 08:27.840]  All right.
[08:27.840 --> 08:31.040]  That being said, we have a caller up on the board.
[08:31.040 --> 08:35.880]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[08:35.880 --> 08:38.120]  If you want to call in, please do.
[08:38.120 --> 08:42.600]  If you've got an issue going on, let's hear about it and if you have an issue with it,
[08:42.600 --> 08:45.520]  let's see if we can come up with something to do with that issue.
[08:45.520 --> 08:48.520]  That being said, let's get to John in New York.
[08:48.520 --> 08:50.360]  John, what can we do for you?
[08:50.360 --> 08:52.480]  Hello, can you hear me okay?
[08:52.480 --> 08:56.080]  If you'll talk a little more directly into your phone, I can.
[08:56.080 --> 08:57.080]  Okay, great.
[08:57.080 --> 08:58.080]  Okay.
[08:58.080 --> 08:59.080]  There we go.
[08:59.080 --> 09:00.080]  Hi.
[09:00.080 --> 09:01.080]  More update.
[09:01.080 --> 09:07.640]  We filed an appeal on a seat belt that I sold you about a long time ago and with yours
[09:07.640 --> 09:17.680]  and Randy's help, we did a pretty good job of writing it up and the main issue was I
[09:17.680 --> 09:21.560]  could read you what they wrote as an answer in the appeal.
[09:21.560 --> 09:26.480]  In other words, they didn't overturn the, they didn't dismiss the ticket.
[09:26.480 --> 09:32.920]  They said, yeah, you're guilty and here's why and I could go through all that but the
[09:32.920 --> 09:39.040]  real reason, there were several things that the defendant wrote himself and I wrote the
[09:39.040 --> 09:46.840]  one that said something like this, the ticket says no seat belt.
[09:46.840 --> 09:55.040]  This officer stands up in court and without giving proper notice, changes material facts
[09:55.040 --> 10:01.000]  and says, well, it was later determined that he probably was, he may have been wearing
[10:01.000 --> 10:04.080]  a seat belt but he was just wearing it wrong.
[10:04.080 --> 10:13.080]  Well, now number one, they violated his rights because they didn't give him proper notice.
[10:13.080 --> 10:22.240]  No time for discovery, they just, okay, that's neither a proper notice or discovery issue.
[10:22.240 --> 10:26.000]  It's a time to impeach the witness issue.
[10:26.000 --> 10:29.840]  May this is what's considered the evidentiary phase of the trial.
[10:29.840 --> 10:33.760]  Any discovery that was done is irrelevant to what comes out of the evidentiary phase
[10:33.760 --> 10:35.560]  of the trial.
[10:35.560 --> 10:40.280]  You have to know what to ask for in discovery before the trial even begins.
[10:40.280 --> 10:46.680]  So if you had prior information relating to what the officer was asserting to be fact
[10:46.680 --> 10:52.440]  and the officer later changed that fact on the witness stand, then that's an impeachable
[10:52.440 --> 10:53.440]  statement.
[10:53.440 --> 10:57.240]  Well, officer, previously you stated he was not wearing the seat belt.
[10:57.240 --> 10:59.680]  The citation says not wearing the seat belt.
[10:59.680 --> 11:02.280]  The complaint says not wearing the seat belt.
[11:02.280 --> 11:07.360]  Yet here you just testified that he was wearing the seat belt.
[11:07.360 --> 11:11.960]  Nothing in the citation, nothing in the complaint, nothing in any of the evidence introduced by
[11:11.960 --> 11:16.400]  you to this date has mentioned incorrect wearing of a seat belt.
[11:16.400 --> 11:21.080]  Now suddenly you want to state that that is the basis for the citation after all this
[11:21.080 --> 11:27.240]  time has passed and all these facts have been presented as the evidence in discovery.
[11:27.240 --> 11:34.080]  So were you lying when you made the ticket out or are you lying on the stand today?
[11:34.080 --> 11:37.040]  That's when he makes an impeachable statement.
[11:37.040 --> 11:42.560]  When the witness gives conflicting testimony, that's when you can get the conviction overturned
[11:42.560 --> 11:49.680]  because the witness falsified the evidence prior to the trial.
[11:49.680 --> 11:57.360]  And then you were unable to obtain proper evidence because of the facts you were given in relation
[11:57.360 --> 12:00.040]  to the charge.
[12:00.040 --> 12:01.040]  See how that works?
[12:01.040 --> 12:09.280]  Well, during the trial the defendant stood up and said, but your honor, the ticket, I
[12:09.280 --> 12:17.920]  was ticketed for failure to wear a seat belt and now this is contradictory.
[12:17.920 --> 12:22.000]  And he brought it up to the judge and the judge went right past it and so did the appeals
[12:22.000 --> 12:23.000]  court.
[12:23.000 --> 12:30.640]  Now at the scene, at the tragic scene itself, the cop did now, here it comes, the cop did
[12:30.640 --> 12:35.240]  say, I stopped you because you weren't wearing your seat belt and the witness, one of the
[12:35.240 --> 12:40.440]  witnesses, there was a witness in the car who got out and said, officer, I saw that
[12:40.440 --> 12:44.800]  he was wearing his seat belt and I'll testify to that in court.
[12:44.800 --> 12:48.240]  That's when the cop said, well, he probably just wasn't wearing it right.
[12:48.240 --> 12:51.120]  Okay, that's at the same instance.
[12:51.120 --> 12:55.000]  Then he didn't give false information on the stand.
[12:55.000 --> 13:00.040]  It conflicts with what the actual allegation is, which means they didn't prove the charge
[13:00.040 --> 13:06.240]  that they were making and that's what you should have objected to.
[13:06.240 --> 13:10.840]  They're attempting to, they're charging him with this, but they're convicting him of that
[13:10.840 --> 13:13.440]  and that is not a part of the original charge.
[13:13.440 --> 13:17.520]  That's what he said, that's what the defendant said, exactly that.
[13:17.520 --> 13:22.240]  He said, first you said one thing, now you're saying something else and it contradicts.
[13:22.240 --> 13:25.880]  No, that's not the same thing.
[13:25.880 --> 13:30.520]  The elemental fact pattern is wrong.
[13:30.520 --> 13:35.080]  Not wearing a seat belt has a specific set of factual elements that must exist for the
[13:35.080 --> 13:37.120]  charge to be true, right?
[13:37.120 --> 13:38.120]  Yep.
[13:38.120 --> 13:39.120]  Okay.
[13:39.120 --> 13:45.600]  In order for an incorrect wearing of a seat belt to be a valid charge, that there must
[13:45.600 --> 13:51.160]  be a statute that says it's an offense to incorrectly wear the seat belt.
[13:51.160 --> 13:58.280]  Now, if they are not part of the same set of statutes or the same statute, in other
[13:58.280 --> 14:05.040]  words, just different conditions thereof, then they did not prove the charge they made.
[14:05.040 --> 14:10.320]  They proved of something different without the consent of the accused to being tried
[14:10.320 --> 14:16.560]  in a different set of facts or on a different set of facts, okay?
[14:16.560 --> 14:18.720]  And that's the issue that should have been raised.
[14:18.720 --> 14:26.320]  It's not the same as what you're talking about.
[14:26.320 --> 14:27.320]  So who's wrong?
[14:27.320 --> 14:29.600]  Us or the cop?
[14:29.600 --> 14:37.080]  Well without knowing exactly what was put in the appeal, I can't answer that.
[14:37.080 --> 14:41.560]  If the only issue raised on the appeal was the fact that the officer was allegedly giving
[14:41.560 --> 14:48.120]  conflicting testimony, then that's where you lost the issue right there.
[14:48.120 --> 14:52.560]  Because the issue is the state failed to prove the charge.
[14:52.560 --> 14:57.360]  They did not prove all the required elements of the actual offense.
[14:57.360 --> 15:04.200]  They instead attempted to change offenses at trial, and now you can claim no notice to
[15:04.200 --> 15:05.200]  the accused.
[15:05.200 --> 15:06.200]  Okay?
[15:06.200 --> 15:07.760]  Say that again.
[15:07.760 --> 15:14.120]  I said they tried to change the offense at trial without notice to the accused.
[15:14.120 --> 15:20.280]  That's something you could complain about, but the issue remains, is there such an offense
[15:20.280 --> 15:22.240]  in the first place?
[15:22.240 --> 15:28.760]  Is anything that he was actually saying a part of the offense of not wearing a seatbelt,
[15:28.760 --> 15:32.840]  or is it a separate offense in and of itself?
[15:32.840 --> 15:36.640]  What are the answers to those questions?
[15:36.640 --> 15:43.360]  Well, I do have the appeal as I appeal, the part I wrote for him.
[15:43.360 --> 15:47.880]  I'm not asking you about the appeal, I'm asking you about the law.
[15:47.880 --> 15:57.160]  Does the law say that in relation to not wearing a seatbelt as an offense, that improper wearing
[15:57.160 --> 16:03.720]  constitutes the same as not wearing, and as long as it's a factual match of the pattern
[16:03.720 --> 16:07.600]  for incorrectly wearing a seatbelt?
[16:07.600 --> 16:11.760]  All right.
[16:11.760 --> 16:12.760]  Not all right.
[16:12.760 --> 16:15.320]  Does it say that or not?
[16:15.320 --> 16:18.760]  I read the seatbelt law a good 20 times.
[16:18.760 --> 16:19.760]  Okay.
[16:19.760 --> 16:24.400]  Then you should know the answer to the question, does it say that or not?
[16:24.400 --> 16:36.760]  I did not see anywhere where it said improper use, there were, let me go back, hold on.
[16:36.760 --> 16:43.200]  Well, hang on just a second, I got a break coming up and then we'll pick this up on the
[16:43.200 --> 16:44.200]  other side, okay?
[16:44.200 --> 16:45.200]  Okay.
[16:45.200 --> 16:46.200]  All right.
[16:46.200 --> 16:47.200]  Think about that while we're doing it.
[16:47.200 --> 16:48.200]  All right, folks.
[16:48.200 --> 16:49.200]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:49.200 --> 16:55.120]  If you've got a question or a comment, if you want something to discuss, just call in
[16:55.120 --> 16:56.120]  and give us a try.
[16:56.120 --> 16:59.120]  We'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang on.
[16:59.120 --> 17:04.320]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Center.
[17:04.320 --> 17:08.000]  In today's America, we live in a us against them society, and if we the people are ever
[17:08.000 --> 17:11.920]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[17:11.920 --> 17:15.400]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[17:15.400 --> 17:19.400]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[17:19.400 --> 17:23.280]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[17:23.280 --> 17:25.120]  our rights through due process.
[17:25.120 --> 17:28.640]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Katie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[17:28.640 --> 17:32.400]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[17:32.400 --> 17:34.400]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[17:34.400 --> 17:38.760]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and
[17:38.760 --> 17:39.760]  ordering your copy today.
[17:39.760 --> 17:43.240]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[17:43.240 --> 17:47.880]  The Law vs. the Lie, the deal and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[17:47.880 --> 17:50.200]  documents and other useful resource material.
[17:50.200 --> 17:54.160]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[17:54.160 --> 18:00.720]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:00.720 --> 18:06.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:06.000 --> 18:09.400]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:09.400 --> 18:13.840]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.840 --> 18:14.840]  can win two.
[18:14.840 --> 18:19.640]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.640 --> 18:20.640]  civil rights statute.
[18:20.640 --> 18:24.960]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons?
[18:24.960 --> 18:26.960]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:26.960 --> 18:29.600]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[18:29.600 --> 18:34.240]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:34.240 --> 18:39.360]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.360 --> 18:41.520]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.520 --> 18:47.040]  For more information, please visit RuleofLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:47.040 --> 18:49.920]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.920 --> 18:57.760]  That's RuleofLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at yahoo.com.
[18:57.760 --> 19:04.760]  You'll learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:27.760 --> 19:31.640]  All right folks, we are back.
[19:31.640 --> 19:39.760]  This is RuleofLawRadio, calling number 512-646-1984 and we are talking to John in New York.
[19:39.760 --> 19:40.760]  Okay.
[19:40.760 --> 19:49.280]  Well, refresh my memory.
[19:49.280 --> 19:50.920]  What was it that you asked me before?
[19:50.920 --> 19:57.400]  Are we dealing with a statute that has a fact pattern in it for incorrect wearing or
[19:57.400 --> 20:02.960]  use of a seat belt, as well as actually not wearing a seat belt?
[20:02.960 --> 20:03.960]  Okay.
[20:03.960 --> 20:08.160]  So in other words, does the law specifically state when you don't wear it right, you're
[20:08.160 --> 20:10.160]  not wearing it at all?
[20:10.160 --> 20:11.160]  Okay.
[20:11.160 --> 20:13.480]  You did more or less, yes.
[20:13.480 --> 20:14.480]  Okay.
[20:14.480 --> 20:15.480]  I read the law.
[20:15.480 --> 20:16.480]  There's two parts to this.
[20:16.480 --> 20:19.400]  I read the law over and over and over again.
[20:19.400 --> 20:25.920]  I didn't see any place where it said that wearing it wrong is akin to not wearing it
[20:25.920 --> 20:26.920]  at all.
[20:26.920 --> 20:33.520]  And I did find other case law that we used and one was in Watertown, New York and I know
[20:33.520 --> 20:40.120]  it was only a village court or a city court and then I'm not sure if we had one from an
[20:40.120 --> 20:46.560]  appeals court, but the other courts said the same thing that we did, that the law is vague
[20:46.560 --> 20:56.880]  and the way it's written, the average person does not know from how it's written to deduce
[20:56.880 --> 21:03.880]  that they're doing something wrong by not wearing it a certain way and the judge actually
[21:03.880 --> 21:05.400]  came out and said that.
[21:05.400 --> 21:11.240]  Yeah, but unfortunately if you're citing a municipal court, that's not a court of precedent
[21:11.240 --> 21:12.240]  setting record.
[21:12.240 --> 21:13.240]  Right.
[21:13.240 --> 21:14.240]  I understand.
[21:14.240 --> 21:15.240]  I understand.
[21:15.240 --> 21:21.560]  So what all I'm saying is that what am I saying?
[21:21.560 --> 21:24.840]  Just give me a minute before I start screaming.
[21:24.840 --> 21:30.880]  I am so sick of this and I am so sick and tired of these came from court and what they
[21:30.880 --> 21:31.880]  do to people.
[21:31.880 --> 21:38.920]  What I'm saying is if that judge said the same thing, chances are I am correct and the
[21:38.920 --> 21:44.680]  law does not say anything about wearing it wrong is akin to not wearing it at all.
[21:44.680 --> 21:49.440]  Well you can't presume that because of what every year the case may have been versus the
[21:49.440 --> 21:52.240]  time and date of the event in question.
[21:52.240 --> 21:54.080]  You can't presume that.
[21:54.080 --> 21:55.080]  Right.
[21:55.080 --> 22:06.280]  But that's a pretty, it's a fair indication that for me to read the law and not find that
[22:06.280 --> 22:12.760]  in there and then the judge to have said that, that they probably, in other words, what I
[22:12.760 --> 22:14.800]  was saying, does hold water.
[22:14.800 --> 22:16.600]  The average person can help.
[22:16.600 --> 22:17.600]  Okay, no way, man.
[22:17.600 --> 22:20.680]  John, I'm getting mixed messages from you here.
[22:20.680 --> 22:25.360]  You should tell me you've read the law, the entire law, like 20 times.
[22:25.360 --> 22:29.200]  Now you're telling me you're basing your knowledge on the law about whether or not contains a
[22:29.200 --> 22:33.840]  certain fact pattern as elements of the offense.
[22:33.840 --> 22:38.600]  You're saying you have to presume that it doesn't because this court ruled this way.
[22:38.600 --> 22:39.600]  Which one is it, man?
[22:39.600 --> 22:40.600]  It can't be both.
[22:40.600 --> 22:43.920]  Either you know what the statute specifically says or you don't.
[22:43.920 --> 22:48.960]  I know what the statute specifically says and I know what it doesn't say.
[22:48.960 --> 22:55.800]  And unless I'm missing something, the judge is also missing the same thing and I don't
[22:55.800 --> 22:57.400]  think the judge is going to miss it.
[22:57.400 --> 23:00.160]  The chances are really good.
[23:00.160 --> 23:04.240]  Well you said the appellate court ignored it, so what did they ignore?
[23:04.240 --> 23:09.320]  Well they didn't even, all right, here's, I'm going to paraphrase what I wrote and what
[23:09.320 --> 23:17.120]  I wrote was the strongest argument because it was backed up with, well here, I'll just
[23:17.120 --> 23:19.160]  say it.
[23:19.160 --> 23:27.480]  I said the officer wrote on the ticket, no seatbelt.
[23:27.480 --> 23:35.360]  He gets into court and he issues a contradictory statement that totally blows his seatbelt
[23:35.360 --> 23:42.360]  charge, no seatbelt, out of the water because it contradicts what he put on the ticket.
[23:42.360 --> 23:53.320]  He didn't give the defendant proper notice and then I went on to say that it's either
[23:53.320 --> 23:55.760]  one or the other.
[23:55.760 --> 24:01.400]  He can't have been not wearing a seatbelt at all and then it was later determined he
[24:01.400 --> 24:07.480]  was wearing a seatbelt but just improperly and he failed to prove beyond the shadow
[24:07.480 --> 24:09.920]  of a doubt.
[24:09.920 --> 24:17.920]  Beyond a reasonable doubt, beyond a reasonable doubt, or what did I say, beyond a what doubt?
[24:17.920 --> 24:18.920]  Shadow of a doubt.
[24:18.920 --> 24:24.960]  Oh excuse me, beyond a reasonable doubt, yeah, beyond a reasonable doubt then what is clear
[24:24.960 --> 24:29.640]  and convincing, what court does that go into, clear and convincing evidence?
[24:29.640 --> 24:32.760]  Well it's applicable in any court.
[24:32.760 --> 24:38.880]  Okay, well in other words clear and convincing or beyond a reasonable doubt?
[24:38.880 --> 24:43.600]  Well you're talking about preponderance of the evidence versus reasonable doubt.
[24:43.600 --> 24:44.600]  Yeah.
[24:44.600 --> 24:45.600]  Preponderance is civil.
[24:45.600 --> 24:46.600]  Yeah, civil court.
[24:46.600 --> 24:48.600]  That's tort and contrary.
[24:48.600 --> 24:49.600]  Yeah.
[24:49.600 --> 24:50.600]  Okay.
[24:50.600 --> 24:53.600]  So that's what I said.
[24:53.600 --> 24:58.720]  I said he failed to prove, the officer failed to prove the charge on the ticket and therefore
[24:58.720 --> 25:01.720]  that ticket.
[25:01.720 --> 25:05.120]  Was the ticket serving as the complaint?
[25:05.120 --> 25:09.120]  Yes.
[25:09.120 --> 25:10.120]  Yep.
[25:10.120 --> 25:11.120]  Okay.
[25:11.120 --> 25:16.480]  And then the judge said guilty because you weren't wearing your seatbelt.
[25:16.480 --> 25:19.040]  He modeled what was on the ticket.
[25:19.040 --> 25:23.280]  He didn't mouse what the officer said to Paul.
[25:23.280 --> 25:28.040]  Well it was later determined that he was wearing it but he just wasn't wearing it properly.
[25:28.040 --> 25:31.520]  So the judge said guilty, you weren't wearing your seatbelt.
[25:31.520 --> 25:34.280]  Let me ask you if you put something in your appeal.
[25:34.280 --> 25:38.000]  Now when you say judge, in this case you're talking about the trial judge, not the appellate
[25:38.000 --> 25:39.000]  judge, right?
[25:39.000 --> 25:40.000]  That's correct.
[25:40.000 --> 25:41.000]  That's correct.
[25:41.000 --> 25:42.000]  The trial judge.
[25:42.000 --> 25:43.000]  And I didn't say that.
[25:43.000 --> 25:44.000]  I didn't make that statement.
[25:44.000 --> 25:52.240]  In your appeal did you admonish abuse of discretion?
[25:52.240 --> 26:00.040]  The judge made a statement of fact from his own mouth as a witness to the case which he
[26:00.040 --> 26:07.560]  cannot do in lieu of an actual fact witness who just testified the complete opposite of
[26:07.560 --> 26:10.560]  what the judge said.
[26:10.560 --> 26:12.400]  That's abuse of discretion.
[26:12.400 --> 26:18.400]  That's also speaking to the evidence which the judge cannot do.
[26:18.400 --> 26:30.280]  It's also testifying as a witness which the judge cannot do.
[26:30.280 --> 26:36.880]  I did say that the judge failed to apply the law to the facts of the case and I did say
[26:36.880 --> 26:38.360]  that.
[26:38.360 --> 26:43.880]  The judge spoke as a witness in the case that he was hearing.
[26:43.880 --> 26:49.920]  And he said you weren't wearing your seat belt, that is a statement of fact.
[26:49.920 --> 26:55.440]  It's not a conclusion because he's not basing it upon the law.
[26:55.440 --> 26:58.120]  He's basing it upon the way he wants to rule.
[26:58.120 --> 27:01.360]  Okay, how should he have said that?
[27:01.360 --> 27:04.160]  Tell me how he should have worded it.
[27:04.160 --> 27:11.920]  He should have said the statute contains elements that allow for the charge to exist if the
[27:11.920 --> 27:14.960]  seat belt is improperly worn.
[27:14.960 --> 27:18.480]  If of course the law does contain that, okay?
[27:18.480 --> 27:21.440]  If he did not say that, I understand he didn't say that.
[27:21.440 --> 27:26.400]  I'm not saying that he should have because it's there, I'm saying that if he was going
[27:26.400 --> 27:32.120]  to do it correctly, that's how he would have done it and not been making himself a witness.
[27:32.120 --> 27:39.800]  But when he decides to speak matter of factly about something that the officer who was the
[27:39.800 --> 27:48.800]  only fact witness just testified was not true and the judge interjected that it was true,
[27:48.800 --> 27:52.440]  he is being a witness and he can't do that.
[27:52.440 --> 27:54.640]  Now, what do you call that?
[27:54.640 --> 27:56.640]  Abuse of discretion.
[27:56.640 --> 27:57.640]  Okay.
[27:57.640 --> 27:59.920]  Conflict of interest.
[27:59.920 --> 28:00.920]  Okay.
[28:00.920 --> 28:04.320]  And tell me what you do about that.
[28:04.320 --> 28:05.320]  You object.
[28:05.320 --> 28:06.320]  Immediately.
[28:06.320 --> 28:10.840]  Objection, judge, that is a legal conclusion and a statement of fact.
[28:10.840 --> 28:13.160]  You are not a witness in this case.
[28:13.160 --> 28:15.320]  Only that officer is the fact witness.
[28:15.320 --> 28:20.240]  If you're going to make that statement of fact out of your own mouth, you are disqualified
[28:20.240 --> 28:25.600]  and I demand you get off the bench and be sworn in as a witness.
[28:25.600 --> 28:28.120]  That's what you do about it.
[28:28.120 --> 28:29.120]  Right.
[28:29.120 --> 28:30.120]  Okay.
[28:30.120 --> 28:39.040]  Now, did you raise the issue of abuse of discretion and the judge improperly acting
[28:39.040 --> 28:41.440]  as a witness for the prosecution?
[28:41.440 --> 28:42.440]  No.
[28:42.440 --> 28:44.000]  Not that I know of.
[28:44.000 --> 28:45.000]  No.
[28:45.000 --> 28:46.000]  Well, there you go.
[28:46.000 --> 28:48.520]  So, why did the appeals court not overturn?
[28:48.520 --> 28:54.680]  Well, because of that reason then, but they didn't, they didn't even address it.
[28:54.680 --> 28:56.520]  They didn't say what you just said.
[28:56.520 --> 28:57.520]  Well, you should have done that.
[28:57.520 --> 29:04.240]  I'm not asking if they said what I said, I'm asking you what reason did they give you?
[29:04.240 --> 29:06.520]  That was not one of the reasons.
[29:06.520 --> 29:07.520]  Okay.
[29:07.520 --> 29:10.020]  What was?
[29:10.020 --> 29:13.480]  I'm going to have to go, I have to open it up and read the thing.
[29:13.480 --> 29:18.680]  They said that, for example, that the law was not vague.
[29:18.680 --> 29:26.760]  The seat belt law was not written vague and that was one of the reasons and it's plain
[29:26.760 --> 29:31.600]  to see that he violated the law because it wasn't vague and you can't use that as an
[29:31.600 --> 29:34.280]  excuse in other words.
[29:34.280 --> 29:37.760]  That was one element and I'd have to go back and open it up.
[29:37.760 --> 29:39.320]  I'm sitting here in front of the computer.
[29:39.320 --> 29:42.760]  It's not going to happen while I'm talking to you on the phone.
[29:42.760 --> 29:44.760]  I'm going to have to look for it.
[29:44.760 --> 29:45.760]  I filed it.
[29:45.760 --> 29:46.760]  Okay.
[29:46.760 --> 29:47.760]  Hang on.
[29:47.760 --> 29:48.760]  I got another break coming up here.
[29:48.760 --> 29:49.760]  Just a second.
[29:49.760 --> 29:50.760]  All right.
[29:50.760 --> 29:51.760]  All right, folks.
[29:51.760 --> 29:57.040]  This is rule of all radio, 512-646-1984, give us a call, get in line.
[29:57.040 --> 29:58.040]  Let's talk about something.
[29:58.040 --> 29:59.040]  We'll be right back.
[29:59.040 --> 30:00.040]  Pressure.
[30:00.040 --> 30:07.760]  We usually associate it with stress and negativity but sometimes a bit of pressure can be healing.
[30:07.760 --> 30:11.440]  Under DeCatherine Albrecht and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like nausea can
[30:11.440 --> 30:16.000]  be cured using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.000 --> 30:21.600]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.600 --> 30:26.360]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.360 --> 30:27.800]  So protect your rights.
[30:27.800 --> 30:31.520]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.520 --> 30:34.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.120 --> 30:38.400]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:38.400 --> 30:41.920]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.920 --> 30:45.680]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.680 --> 30:49.920]  Acupressure is an ancient practice that uses finger or hand pressure to cure everything
[30:49.920 --> 30:52.040]  from headaches to constipation.
[30:52.040 --> 30:55.440]  The pressure is applied to points known as meridians that are believed to control the
[30:55.440 --> 30:58.200]  flow of energy in the human body.
[30:58.200 --> 31:00.200]  Acupressure offers a simple cure for nausea.
[31:00.200 --> 31:04.720]  You might try the next time you get a queasy stomach or a case of motion sickness.
[31:04.720 --> 31:07.880]  Simply apply moderate pressure to the point known as P6.
[31:07.880 --> 31:12.480]  You'll find it on the inside of your wrist about two fingers width down from your palm.
[31:12.480 --> 31:17.320]  Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey anti-nausea
[31:17.320 --> 31:21.680]  wristbands, but this relief is free and always on hand.
[31:21.680 --> 31:30.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.640 --> 31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[31:36.000 --> 31:38.040]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.040 --> 31:43.080]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.080 --> 31:45.840]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:45.840 --> 31:52.360]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a structural engineer, I'm a New York City correctionalist,
[31:52.360 --> 31:57.040]  I'm an Air Force pilot, I'm a father who lost his son, we're Americans and we deserve
[31:57.040 --> 31:58.040]  the truth.
[31:58.040 --> 32:00.400]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:00.400 --> 32:02.920]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[32:02.920 --> 32:06.200]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[32:06.200 --> 32:09.880]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[32:09.880 --> 32:10.880]  them to pay for it.
[32:10.880 --> 32:14.480]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[32:14.480 --> 32:18.280]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[32:18.280 --> 32:21.040]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[32:21.040 --> 32:25.320]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with
[32:25.320 --> 32:26.640]  zero complaints.
[32:26.640 --> 32:31.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[32:31.000 --> 32:32.080]  first time.
[32:32.080 --> 32:38.400]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:38.400 --> 32:42.760]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos
[32:42.760 --> 32:45.360]  Radio Network to help continue this program.
[32:45.360 --> 32:50.480]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[32:50.480 --> 32:56.560]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:56.560 --> 32:58.400]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[32:58.400 --> 33:02.440]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[33:02.440 --> 33:13.520]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[33:13.520 --> 33:41.000]  All right folks, we are back.
[33:41.000 --> 33:42.640]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:42.640 --> 33:49.640]  The call in number 512-646-1984 if you want to call and ask a question or discuss something
[33:49.640 --> 33:50.640]  going on.
[33:50.640 --> 33:53.640]  In the meantime, let's see if we can finish up with John in New York.
[33:53.640 --> 33:55.440]  All right, John, go ahead.
[33:55.440 --> 33:57.760]  Well, I'm trying to find it.
[33:57.760 --> 34:00.200]  I got some of it right here.
[34:00.200 --> 34:05.880]  Defendants claim that he did not receive personal service of the supporting deposition as erroneous.
[34:05.880 --> 34:11.960]  And that's because the top gave it to him at the scene, but then the defendant asked
[34:11.960 --> 34:17.800]  for a copy through the court and they claim they sent it and there was conflicting testimony.
[34:17.800 --> 34:24.520]  The cop, I think, perjured himself when he said, he signed the affidavit of, I'm going
[34:24.520 --> 34:29.560]  to say performance, I can't think of the word, when he signs an affidavit and says, yes,
[34:29.560 --> 34:40.440]  we sent out the deposition and then he said later in the court, in the trial testimony
[34:40.440 --> 34:45.400]  that he says, well, obviously I don't do the mail, first he said he sent it out, then
[34:45.400 --> 34:53.840]  he said the village sent it out and what he said was actually contradictory to what the
[34:53.840 --> 34:54.840]  affidavit said.
[34:54.840 --> 34:57.080]  So I think he really did lie.
[34:57.080 --> 34:59.840]  I think there was perjury there.
[34:59.840 --> 35:04.200]  Then the defendant's remaining contentions regarding the timelines of the court are
[35:04.200 --> 35:05.200]  without merit.
[35:05.200 --> 35:13.560]  In other words, the judge took a sweep time when it came to sending the CD which was for
[35:13.560 --> 35:16.440]  the transcript of the trial to be written.
[35:16.440 --> 35:32.960]  Then conclusion, hold on, this is all backwards and upside down, but I'll do the best I can.
[35:32.960 --> 35:40.760]  There's another page right about now, I'll tell you, Eddie, I'm about ready to screen.
[35:40.760 --> 35:44.600]  Wearing the seat belt is required by law that the shoulder harness properly placed across
[35:44.600 --> 35:46.100]  the defendant's torso.
[35:46.100 --> 35:50.520]  The people concede that this issue is preserved for appellate review.
[35:50.520 --> 35:56.560]  The vehicle and traffic law 1129c3 and 3a reads as follows.
[35:56.560 --> 36:00.560]  No person shall operate a motor vehicle, and here comes the law according to them.
[36:00.560 --> 36:05.240]  No person shall operate a motor vehicle unless such person is restrained by a safety belt
[36:05.240 --> 36:07.560]  approved by the commissioner.
[36:07.560 --> 36:10.480]  And what the hell that means, we don't know.
[36:10.480 --> 36:14.240]  No person 16 years of age or over shall be a passenger in the front seat of a motor
[36:14.240 --> 36:18.080]  vehicle unless a person is restrained by a safety belt approved by the commissioner
[36:18.080 --> 36:22.760]  except it's otherwise provided for passengers under the age of four.
[36:22.760 --> 36:27.400]  It shall be a violation of the section of a person is seated in a seating position equipped
[36:27.400 --> 36:32.760]  with both a lap safety belt and a shoulder harness belt, and such person is not restrained
[36:32.760 --> 36:40.840]  by both such lap safety belt and shoulder harness belt, emphasis added.
[36:40.840 --> 36:45.640]  At the time of the stop, the defendant admitted that the seat belt was clipped but not over
[36:45.640 --> 36:46.760]  his shoulder.
[36:46.760 --> 36:50.080]  I don't know about that.
[36:50.080 --> 36:53.280]  I don't know if that statement is actually accurate.
[36:53.280 --> 36:56.080]  I don't know that the defendant actually said that.
[36:56.080 --> 37:00.920]  Furthermore, the testimony is supported by the defendant's own witness who testified
[37:00.920 --> 37:07.080]  and this is garbage, the witness was deaf, it's hard hearing and you did not understand
[37:07.080 --> 37:10.520]  the question and they're using that so there you have it.
[37:10.520 --> 37:13.240]  They can only go about what's in the record.
[37:13.240 --> 37:17.480]  If the record doesn't say the person's deaf or the person doesn't make an effort to make
[37:17.480 --> 37:21.800]  it into the record that they're deaf or that the person that called them isn't making the
[37:21.800 --> 37:25.800]  record saying that their witness is partially deaf, then it's not going to be in there.
[37:25.800 --> 37:26.800]  They can't address it.
[37:26.800 --> 37:27.800]  I know.
[37:27.800 --> 37:28.800]  I know.
[37:28.800 --> 37:29.800]  I know.
[37:29.800 --> 37:30.800]  I believe me.
[37:30.800 --> 37:31.800]  Well, I'm a little aware of it.
[37:31.800 --> 37:32.800]  Now, this is what it says.
[37:32.800 --> 37:37.280]  Acceptance otherwise provided for passengers under the age of four, it shall be a violation
[37:37.280 --> 37:38.280]  of the section.
[37:38.280 --> 37:42.080]  If a person is seated in a seating position, equipped with a...
[37:42.080 --> 37:43.080]  Okay.
[37:43.080 --> 37:44.080]  Well, here's the thing.
[37:44.080 --> 37:50.360]  How does a person get informed as to whether or not the seat belt in their particular car
[37:50.360 --> 37:54.160]  is approved by the commissioner or whatever they're talking about?
[37:54.160 --> 37:55.240]  Well, you don't.
[37:55.240 --> 37:57.120]  It's just that that's vague right there.
[37:57.120 --> 37:58.120]  Okay.
[37:58.120 --> 38:00.560]  You're not following what I'm asking here.
[38:00.560 --> 38:05.720]  Stop drawing conclusions and giving me your opinion and answer my questions.
[38:05.720 --> 38:06.720]  Can you do that?
[38:06.720 --> 38:07.720]  Okay.
[38:07.720 --> 38:08.720]  Go ahead.
[38:08.720 --> 38:09.720]  Okay.
[38:09.720 --> 38:10.720]  Go ahead.
[38:10.720 --> 38:16.640]  So, if you are not given any information saying that the seat belt that you're wearing
[38:16.640 --> 38:23.200]  has been approved by the commissioner, how then does one obtain it?
[38:23.200 --> 38:25.200]  I don't know.
[38:25.200 --> 38:29.240]  Who would you call to obtain it?
[38:29.240 --> 38:33.520]  Where does the statute inform you on how to determine whether or not the commissioner
[38:33.520 --> 38:37.600]  approved the safety belt in the particular car you're wearing?
[38:37.600 --> 38:41.920]  And the way the statute is written, read me that section again.
[38:41.920 --> 38:42.920]  Okay.
[38:42.920 --> 38:43.920]  Here we go.
[38:43.920 --> 38:44.920]  Hold on.
[38:44.920 --> 38:47.720]  I hope I can pull it up again.
[38:47.720 --> 38:49.720]  Oh.
[38:49.720 --> 38:54.200]  Acceptance otherwise provided and then say what you just said again.
[38:54.200 --> 38:59.480]  Acceptance as otherwise provided for passengers under the age of four, it shall be a violation
[38:59.480 --> 39:00.480]  of this section.
[39:00.480 --> 39:06.560]  If a person is seated in a seating position equipped with both a lap safety belt and a
[39:06.560 --> 39:12.600]  shoulder harness belt, and such person is not restrained by both such lap safety belt
[39:12.600 --> 39:14.080]  and shoulder harness belt.
[39:14.080 --> 39:16.080]  Oh, wait a minute.
[39:16.080 --> 39:19.680]  The part about the commissioner, I skipped that, wait a minute.
[39:19.680 --> 39:29.240]  And then a person is restrained, vehicle and traffic law, no person shall operate a motor
[39:29.240 --> 39:34.760]  vehicle unless a person is restrained by a safety belt approved by the commissioner.
[39:34.760 --> 39:35.760]  Commissioner of what?
[39:35.760 --> 39:38.960]  Well, it's got to be the commissioner of motor vehicles.
[39:38.960 --> 39:39.960]  There you go.
[39:39.960 --> 39:40.960]  Making conclusions again.
[39:40.960 --> 39:44.720]  But no, I'm just saying what they're going to say.
[39:44.720 --> 39:45.720]  No.
[39:45.720 --> 39:46.720]  You're not.
[39:46.720 --> 39:50.960]  You're making a conclusion about what they're going to say or what you think the law says.
[39:50.960 --> 39:53.120]  You don't actually know.
[39:53.120 --> 39:54.120]  Do you?
[39:54.120 --> 39:55.120]  That's right.
[39:55.120 --> 40:00.320]  It could be the commissioner of balloon pornography for all we know.
[40:00.320 --> 40:01.320]  Exactly.
[40:01.320 --> 40:04.720]  So who is the commissioner?
[40:04.720 --> 40:08.080]  What is the specific job of the commissioner?
[40:08.080 --> 40:12.440]  How does the commissioner's certification come into existence?
[40:12.440 --> 40:17.000]  How does the commissioner notify the purchaser of the car that the approval for that seat
[40:17.000 --> 40:21.800]  belt harness or restraining device was actually given?
[40:21.800 --> 40:26.800]  Are you given a copy of that approval by the commissioner at the time of the purchase
[40:26.800 --> 40:30.440]  of the car, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera?
[40:30.440 --> 40:36.160]  That law is the very definition of vague and ambiguous because it does not specify any
[40:36.160 --> 40:37.680]  of those things.
[40:37.680 --> 40:43.040]  But I'm guessing none of those were raised by you as an issue for vague and ambiguous.
[40:43.040 --> 40:45.080]  No, that's correct.
[40:45.080 --> 40:50.840]  We didn't, not that one.
[40:50.840 --> 40:56.600]  Everything it says in that statute, a restraining device is restraining device defined anywhere
[40:56.600 --> 40:57.600]  in the statute.
[40:57.600 --> 40:59.080]  You need to find that out.
[40:59.080 --> 41:02.120]  Is commissioner defined anywhere in the statute?
[41:02.120 --> 41:07.400]  Is that definition of commissioner applicable to the specific statute we're dealing with?
[41:07.400 --> 41:09.640]  That's something else you've got to find out.
[41:09.640 --> 41:12.680]  That's three different things right there, okay?
[41:12.680 --> 41:15.280]  No, okay, I got it.
[41:15.280 --> 41:22.920]  Does the complaint state that you were or that you failed to wear a seat belt in accordance
[41:22.920 --> 41:30.040]  with a device properly certified by the commissioner?
[41:30.040 --> 41:34.280]  Does the complaint or the citation at all mention anything about the commissioner?
[41:34.280 --> 41:37.040]  No, it doesn't.
[41:37.040 --> 41:44.240]  And they didn't prove their case because the commissioner's certification of the restraining
[41:44.240 --> 41:46.520]  device is an element.
[41:46.520 --> 41:50.200]  It's a required fact element of the offense.
[41:50.200 --> 41:55.960]  It says it right there, a person commits an offense if, he didn't say coming after that
[41:55.960 --> 42:05.920]  if is an element that must be proven, period.
[42:05.920 --> 42:07.320]  Did you get that?
[42:07.320 --> 42:09.160]  Well, sort of, yeah.
[42:09.160 --> 42:10.880]  What do you mean sort of?
[42:10.880 --> 42:19.960]  A person commits an offense if, a, while in a seated position, why didn't your friend
[42:19.960 --> 42:23.640]  say he was standing on his head, not in a seated position?
[42:23.640 --> 42:26.160]  That would have nullified that element.
[42:26.160 --> 42:29.520]  Oh, I see where you're going with this.
[42:29.520 --> 42:30.520]  Okay.
[42:30.520 --> 42:32.080]  You're taking it literally step by step.
[42:32.080 --> 42:33.080]  Okay, keep going.
[42:33.080 --> 42:37.040]  I'm starting to see, keep going.
[42:37.040 --> 42:42.360]  In a seated position, and not properly restrained, it says properly, right?
[42:42.360 --> 42:43.360]  Yeah.
[42:43.360 --> 42:46.800]  Okay, properly addresses the issue of wearing it wrong.
[42:46.800 --> 42:50.640]  Why, why, why, why, see that again?
[42:50.640 --> 42:55.120]  Properly is what addresses the issue of wearing it incorrectly.
[42:55.120 --> 42:57.120]  Okay.
[42:57.120 --> 42:59.600]  All right.
[42:59.600 --> 43:05.400]  Just with a show up, with whatever left and shoulder restraint.
[43:05.400 --> 43:06.400]  Yep.
[43:06.400 --> 43:07.400]  Okay.
[43:07.400 --> 43:09.800]  A safety belt and a shoulder, okay.
[43:09.800 --> 43:10.800]  Again.
[43:10.800 --> 43:11.800]  Well.
[43:11.800 --> 43:14.920]  Which, which piece is the officer saying was not being worn correctly?
[43:14.920 --> 43:16.720]  Is that in the complaint?
[43:16.720 --> 43:20.440]  Was it the shoulder restraint that was not correct, or was it the left restraint that
[43:20.440 --> 43:21.840]  was not correct?
[43:21.840 --> 43:27.720]  His words were that the shoulder restraint wasn't correct, but the ticket doesn't say
[43:27.720 --> 43:28.720]  that.
[43:28.720 --> 43:29.720]  Okay.
[43:29.720 --> 43:30.720]  Okay.
[43:30.720 --> 43:31.720]  Again.
[43:31.720 --> 43:34.720]  The ticket does not have to be verbose with his testimony.
[43:34.720 --> 43:35.720]  Okay.
[43:35.720 --> 43:36.720]  Right.
[43:36.720 --> 43:41.200]  The fact is the statute covers it either way.
[43:41.200 --> 43:45.240]  So you were incorrect in what you think you understood about what you read, because the
[43:45.240 --> 43:47.600]  statute deals with it in both distances.
[43:47.600 --> 43:48.600]  I see.
[43:48.600 --> 43:49.600]  Got it.
[43:49.600 --> 43:50.600]  Hang on just a second.
[43:50.600 --> 43:52.600]  We'll finish this up on the other side.
[43:52.600 --> 43:53.600]  All right, folks.
[43:53.600 --> 43:55.120]  We've got another break coming up.
[43:55.120 --> 43:56.120]  Y'all hang on.
[43:56.120 --> 44:01.000]  We'll see you right back.
[44:01.000 --> 44:04.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.200 --> 44:10.960]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[44:10.960 --> 44:14.800]  that will show you how, in 24 hours, you step by step.
[44:14.800 --> 44:18.840]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.840 --> 44:22.800]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.800 --> 44:27.800]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[44:27.800 --> 44:34.400]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.400 --> 44:39.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:39.120 --> 44:43.400]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.400 --> 44:49.600]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.600 --> 44:53.080]  pro-save tactics, and much more.
[44:53.080 --> 44:59.600]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:59.600 --> 45:02.600]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:02.600 --> 45:06.240]  At Capital Coin Nebulion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by
[45:06.240 --> 45:10.560]  delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[45:10.560 --> 45:14.440]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality
[45:14.440 --> 45:16.040]  coins and precious metals.
[45:16.040 --> 45:20.240]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[45:20.240 --> 45:24.600]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal stealers
[45:24.600 --> 45:25.600]  and journalists.
[45:25.600 --> 45:28.560]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[45:28.560 --> 45:32.840]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products, such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and
[45:32.840 --> 45:33.840]  Pollen Burst.
[45:33.840 --> 45:38.680]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storeable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition
[45:38.680 --> 45:40.840]  at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[45:40.840 --> 45:44.800]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept bitcoins as payment.
[45:44.800 --> 45:47.800]  Call us at 512-646-644-0.
[45:47.800 --> 45:52.800]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, sweet A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[45:52.800 --> 45:55.800]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10-6, Saturdays, 10-2.
[45:55.800 --> 46:23.800]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[46:23.800 --> 46:30.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:30.000 --> 46:34.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[46:34.520 --> 46:39.800]  Give us a call, get in line, let's talk about something that you've got going on.
[46:39.800 --> 46:44.800]  All right, that being said, let's see if we can't finish this up with John in New York.
[46:44.800 --> 46:51.840]  All right, John, either way, the part about the approved by the commissioner or certified
[46:51.840 --> 46:55.840]  by the commissioner comes after the if, just like these other things I was talking about
[46:55.840 --> 46:58.840]  before the break, okay?
[46:58.840 --> 47:01.840]  So the complaint must allege that as a fact element.
[47:01.840 --> 47:08.840]  The individual was improperly wearing a seat belt approved by the commissioner or restraining device
[47:08.840 --> 47:15.840]  as approved or certified by the commissioner of whatever, blah, blah, blah, okay?
[47:15.840 --> 47:16.840]  They didn't prove that.
[47:16.840 --> 47:21.840]  They did not prove all of the essential elements of the offense.
[47:21.840 --> 47:26.840]  Okay, so I blew it, but I blew it, didn't I?
[47:26.840 --> 47:32.840]  Well, again, without reading what you actually put in, I can't say for sure,
[47:32.840 --> 47:37.840]  but from what you've described so far, I would have to say yes.
[47:37.840 --> 47:40.840]  In other words, I blew it based on what I told you.
[47:40.840 --> 47:51.840]  Based on what you told me, you addressed the incorrect fact pattern, the wrong fact pattern.
[47:51.840 --> 47:52.840]  Okay.
[47:52.840 --> 47:59.840]  Because the statute does cover whether they're wearing it at all or whether they're wearing it properly
[47:59.840 --> 48:06.840]  when it uses the word improperly.
[48:06.840 --> 48:07.840]  All right.
[48:07.840 --> 48:14.840]  I'm sorry if it uses the word properly.
[48:14.840 --> 48:19.840]  Yep.
[48:19.840 --> 48:26.840]  Okay, so this is what I keep saying about don't be reading things into a statute that isn't there
[48:26.840 --> 48:35.840]  and don't be taking away from what is.
[48:35.840 --> 48:41.840]  Yep, looks like I blew it.
[48:41.840 --> 48:46.840]  Okay, well then that gives you something to chew over for next time.
[48:46.840 --> 48:50.840]  Is there anything that I can do to pull it out of the fire?
[48:50.840 --> 48:55.840]  Well, the problem is that you've already raised the issues on appeal and preserved the issues
[48:55.840 --> 49:00.840]  that you intended to address and you didn't preserve the ones we've just discussed,
[49:00.840 --> 49:06.840]  you don't have anywhere to go from here because you can't raise new evidence and new issues
[49:06.840 --> 49:17.840]  on your second level appeal that you didn't raise in your first level appeal.
[49:17.840 --> 49:22.840]  Okay, as we're talking, I'm looking to see where it was that I wrote.
[49:22.840 --> 49:27.840]  The minute I hang up, I'll find it what I wrote for the appeal.
[49:27.840 --> 49:29.840]  Can I send it to you on an email?
[49:29.840 --> 49:34.840]  You can, I can't guarantee you when I'll be able to sit down and read it, but you can send it.
[49:34.840 --> 49:38.840]  Okay, what's your, hold on, let me grab a pen.
[49:38.840 --> 49:41.840]  Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com.
[49:41.840 --> 49:44.840]  Okay, hold on, say it again.
[49:44.840 --> 49:57.840]  Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com.
[49:57.840 --> 49:59.840]  Is that IE?
[49:59.840 --> 50:01.840]  Yes.
[50:01.840 --> 50:02.840]  Okay.
[50:02.840 --> 50:05.840]  Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com.
[50:05.840 --> 50:06.840]  Yes.
[50:06.840 --> 50:07.840]  That's it.
[50:07.840 --> 50:11.840]  Even if you get to it in a matter of days, it's very short.
[50:11.840 --> 50:15.840]  Well, it's very nice of you to be optimistic.
[50:15.840 --> 50:17.840]  What's it?
[50:17.840 --> 50:18.840]  Optimistic.
[50:18.840 --> 50:20.840]  In a matter of days.
[50:20.840 --> 50:29.840]  Yeah, well, I know, even if it's a matter of a week or two weeks, do it sometime because then I'll know for next time.
[50:29.840 --> 50:30.840]  And it's very short.
[50:30.840 --> 50:34.840]  It will take you like 20 seconds to read.
[50:34.840 --> 50:35.840]  All righty.
[50:35.840 --> 50:36.840]  Okay.
[50:36.840 --> 50:37.840]  Yep.
[50:37.840 --> 50:39.840]  All right, thanks for going in, John.
[50:39.840 --> 50:40.840]  Yep, thank you.
[50:40.840 --> 50:41.840]  You're welcome.
[50:41.840 --> 50:43.840]  Bye-bye.
[50:43.840 --> 50:46.840]  All right, now we have Tyler in Wyoming.
[50:46.840 --> 50:49.840]  Tyler, what do you have?
[50:49.840 --> 50:50.840]  What do you have?
[50:50.840 --> 50:52.840]  Good to talk to you, John.
[50:52.840 --> 50:55.840]  Just speak into your phone, Tyler.
[50:55.840 --> 50:56.840]  Sorry about that.
[50:56.840 --> 50:58.840]  I said it's good to talk to you again.
[50:58.840 --> 50:59.840]  Well, thank you.
[50:59.840 --> 51:01.840]  Good to talk to you too.
[51:01.840 --> 51:08.840]  My main question was, we're fighting the traffic thing out here.
[51:08.840 --> 51:14.840]  We're always getting this for no driver's license, current registration, et cetera.
[51:14.840 --> 51:22.840]  And we're going into court, we're having some success with some of the dismissals and different things you're filing, but it's a waste of time.
[51:22.840 --> 51:25.840]  It's only a temporary kind of thing.
[51:25.840 --> 51:31.840]  What we want to do is kind of go for the head of the snake and secure this permanently.
[51:31.840 --> 51:37.840]  I don't know if there's a way to do that, but the only way you're going to do it is sue for injunctive relief.
[51:37.840 --> 51:46.840]  And you better have every single one of your ducks in a perfect row when you do that, because they will find an excuse necessary not to side with you over what they've been doing.
[51:46.840 --> 51:50.840]  Now, when you say ducks in a row, can you kind of spin?
[51:50.840 --> 52:04.840]  You better know the law front to back, sideways, upside down, backwards, forwards, and you be able to connect any part of it to any other part of it via the statutory structure that created it.
[52:04.840 --> 52:07.840]  And how it all works together, how it meshes.
[52:07.840 --> 52:10.840]  If you can't do that, then you can't argue it.
[52:10.840 --> 52:13.840]  If you can't argue it, you're not going to win.
[52:13.840 --> 52:15.840]  Okay.
[52:15.840 --> 52:20.840]  And for injunctive relief, that would be like a permanent injunction.
[52:20.840 --> 52:23.840]  Yes.
[52:23.840 --> 52:24.840]  Okay.
[52:24.840 --> 52:33.840]  And I think last time I talked to you, do you say something like for the judge to issue a declaratory, how did you word that?
[52:33.840 --> 52:40.840]  No, a declaratory judgment is where the other side isn't there to respond, even though they were given notice and they don't.
[52:40.840 --> 52:47.840]  So the judge makes a declaration, a finding for you, a declaratory judgment.
[52:47.840 --> 52:50.840]  But that's not what you're after.
[52:50.840 --> 53:04.840]  What an injunctive, what injunctive relief is, is a court order prohibiting enforcement, further enforcement of the law under its current manifestation.
[53:04.840 --> 53:05.840]  Okay.
[53:05.840 --> 53:06.840]  Right.
[53:06.840 --> 53:25.840]  Now, if they rewrite it later and try to say they fixed the problem that no longer applies, then you may have to sue for another one if you can prove that the changes they made didn't change anything relevant to what the injunction was for in the first place, such as not being a commercial driver.
[53:25.840 --> 53:27.840]  Sure.
[53:27.840 --> 53:38.840]  Now, should you, should we just kind of play it safe and just go after those two citations or those things they'd write you under the main ones?
[53:38.840 --> 53:49.840]  Well, you can't win an injunction on enforcement if you can't do it for the entire enforcement of the code.
[53:49.840 --> 53:54.840]  They're not going to say, well, yeah, we can't enforce seatbelts against you, but we can enforce licenses.
[53:54.840 --> 53:56.840]  It's not going to work that way.
[53:56.840 --> 53:58.840]  Right.
[53:58.840 --> 54:10.840]  I think our main pushback is kind of, and I'm sure you're going to have, I don't know if it would be the attorney general or who would defend that, but what do we do when they bring the issue of safety yet?
[54:10.840 --> 54:16.840]  When they say, okay, we have a right to do this because of safety, public safety, irrelevant of whether the person's in control.
[54:16.840 --> 54:17.840]  No, they don't.
[54:17.840 --> 54:22.840]  The police power cannot abrogate a right in the name of public safety.
[54:22.840 --> 54:32.840]  Plus, they haven't done anything to prove that the possession of a license increases public safety.
[54:32.840 --> 54:39.840]  Now, Randy said I was creating a false dichotomy when I said this before, but I want to say it again because I don't see how that's possible.
[54:39.840 --> 54:54.840]  You have all these license drivers that are getting into accidents, causing damage to property in persons, killing people, driving drunk, driving impaired, or just driving like idiots to begin with, and they have a license, right?
[54:54.840 --> 54:55.840]  Yes.
[54:55.840 --> 55:05.840]  And yet the person without one is being extra careful, extra diligent, and very rarely do you hear of an accident involving somebody that didn't have one.
[55:05.840 --> 55:06.840]  That is very much.
[55:06.840 --> 55:08.840]  So which ratio is greater?
[55:08.840 --> 55:15.840]  The people who got the license and still killed other people or did stupid things with their cars?
[55:15.840 --> 55:18.840]  Or the ones who didn't?
[55:18.840 --> 55:20.840]  I will.
[55:20.840 --> 55:21.840]  Okay.
[55:21.840 --> 55:37.840]  So the fact here is when they say public safety, there is no demonstrable statistical facts to show that the possession of a license has a damn thing to do with public safety because a license is not issued for the purpose of safety.
[55:37.840 --> 55:45.840]  A license is issued for the purpose of granting permission to do that which would otherwise be illegal without the license.
[55:45.840 --> 55:51.840]  That is a completely different argument from public safety.
[55:51.840 --> 55:52.840]  Okay.
[55:52.840 --> 56:08.840]  And since the public has the right to move about the states freely, unencumbered by government interference, then they cannot convert that right into a privilege, license it, and sell it back to you.
[56:08.840 --> 56:11.840]  Correct.
[56:11.840 --> 56:12.840]  Correct.
[56:12.840 --> 56:22.840]  And that's where the big scam is, is where they claim the element that you're automatically a driver or an operator of a motor vehicle.
[56:22.840 --> 56:33.840]  They try to claim you're exercising a privilege which they have not proven, they've just alleged, but they haven't proven it.
[56:33.840 --> 56:51.840]  They've even done a research or study on the word privilege and license as well, and correct me if I'm wrong, but those words are all connected with, constitutionally, they can only use those in statutes when they apply to businesses or occupations.
[56:51.840 --> 56:53.840]  Is that correct?
[56:53.840 --> 57:03.840]  I don't know how you came to that determination, how you attached the facts together to come to that, so I can't answer that for you as far as how you're posing the question.
[57:03.840 --> 57:05.840]  Well, I'd like to know words and say.
[57:05.840 --> 57:21.840]  What I can tell you is that from my experience, the statute, especially malumprohibitum statutes, are all about some prohibited activity that requires a privileged access to do.
[57:21.840 --> 57:22.840]  Okay.
[57:22.840 --> 57:27.840]  Regulatory in nature, hence it is commercial in nature.
[57:27.840 --> 57:28.840]  Yeah.
[57:28.840 --> 57:29.840]  Okay.
[57:29.840 --> 57:36.840]  Because regulatory only applies to things that are relating to commerce.
[57:36.840 --> 57:39.840]  Commerce, yeah.
[57:39.840 --> 57:40.840]  Correct.
[57:40.840 --> 57:42.840]  No, I get that, and I appreciate that.
[57:42.840 --> 57:45.840]  Well, one quick question that you pointed out.
[57:45.840 --> 57:51.840]  You said there was a little bit of a difference between, I think I know the answer, but also for your listeners,
[57:51.840 --> 57:54.840]  the registration and the driver's license.
[57:54.840 --> 58:08.840]  He said that to register, and some of the history that I studied on registration, part of the purpose or the excuse they said behind it was so you could identify your automobile or whatever,
[58:08.840 --> 58:11.840]  because it had that signification, that number on it.
[58:11.840 --> 58:19.840]  Registration was intended to be put in place so that you could volunteer for it if you wanted the state to be able to help find your car if it was stolen.
[58:19.840 --> 58:22.840]  In a second, we'll finish this up on the other side of this break.
[58:22.840 --> 58:26.840]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show with your host Eddie Craig.
[58:26.840 --> 58:38.840]  Call in number 512-646-1984 if you want to call and get in line and ask us a question or check or see if we've got anything to help you with on the case you may be working on or whatever.
[58:38.840 --> 58:50.840]  Just hang on and we'll finish up this break and get back to it.
[58:50.840 --> 58:58.840]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.840 --> 59:08.840]  New translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:08.840 --> 59:17.840]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.840 --> 59:27.840]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.840 --> 59:32.840]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.840 --> 59:47.840]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.840 --> 59:57.840]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:18.840 --> 01:00:34.840]  Markets for Wednesday the 6th of February 2019 open with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce, silver $15.77 an ounce, copper $2.83 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $3.66 a barrel,
[01:00:34.840 --> 01:00:53.840]  Brent crude $61.98 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market capitalization, Bitcoin $3,401.64, Ripple XRP $0.29, Ethereum $10.10 and Eos is at $2.32 a crypto coin.
[01:00:53.840 --> 01:01:05.840]  Today in History, the year 1918, British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property qualifications get the right to vote when the representation of the People Act of 1918 was passed by parliament.
[01:01:05.840 --> 01:01:08.840]  Today in History.
[01:01:08.840 --> 01:01:26.840]  In recent years, several Texas-based organizations filed a lawsuit today requesting that a federal court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally registered to vote. The list was compiled after an 11 month long investigation by the office of the Texas Secretary of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety,
[01:01:26.840 --> 01:01:44.840]  which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens who were registered to vote when obtaining H.R. Arbor's license. Over half of the 95,000 did indeed vote, it seems. However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:01:44.840 --> 01:01:56.840]  Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote. Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond with proof of eligibility.
[01:01:56.840 --> 01:02:05.840]  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[01:02:05.840 --> 01:02:19.840]  A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck after a vape pen exploded while he was using it. It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[01:02:19.840 --> 01:02:27.840]  An X-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem. The vape store's smoke and vape DZ has refused to comment.
[01:02:27.840 --> 01:02:46.840]  First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz, interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association Conference, which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February 14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[01:02:46.840 --> 01:02:58.840]  You can find the interview at kiiitv.com. This was Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[01:03:16.840 --> 01:03:26.840]  Country folks can't survive. Country folks can't survive.
[01:03:26.840 --> 01:03:35.840]  Because you can't starve about and you can't make a run, those Muslim old boys raise own shotguns.
[01:03:35.840 --> 01:03:46.840]  We say praise, we say man, if you ain't in the past, we don't give a damn.
[01:03:46.840 --> 01:03:58.840]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984, and we are speaking with Tyler in Wyoming. Alright, Tyler, go ahead.
[01:03:58.840 --> 01:04:07.840]  Another question on registration, something I'm conflicted with. I have for my personal business a bucket truck and aerial lift out here in Wyoming.
[01:04:07.840 --> 01:04:19.840]  And it is not a commercial vehicle because it has to be over 26,000 pounds to be a commercial vehicle. And it's not a vehicle at all because I don't transport persons and property with it.
[01:04:19.840 --> 01:04:32.840]  However, I do use it on site to do the work and so forth, work on trees, etc. But the registration is conflicting with me because I have to insure it commercial.
[01:04:32.840 --> 01:04:46.840]  Even though it's not really a commercial vehicle, they won't insure it unless it's on a commercial policy. So I don't know whether I should just kind of do like you've done, put a private auto tag on it.
[01:04:46.840 --> 01:04:59.840]  So if you need to do your business until you get them stopped, then you're risking an awful lot to even be able to work having to constantly unimpound your work truck.
[01:04:59.840 --> 01:05:07.840]  That's what I was thinking about. My main question here is if I get it registered, that does not fit me in transportation, does it?
[01:05:07.840 --> 01:05:17.840]  That's exactly what registration does. Registration serves one purpose and one purpose only to license the car for use in transportation.
[01:05:17.840 --> 01:05:26.840]  What happens when you register? Two things. Certificate of title, license plates, license plates.
[01:05:26.840 --> 01:05:28.840]  Right.
[01:05:28.840 --> 01:05:34.840]  So you are licensing your car for commercial use when you put those plates on it.
[01:05:34.840 --> 01:05:43.840]  Right. But it's also true if you argument that you don't have to be in transportation when you're using it. Correct?
[01:05:43.840 --> 01:05:58.840]  Again, transportation isn't done by the car alone. There has to be a driver or an operator for transportation to make use of the car or vehicle for that purpose, right?
[01:05:58.840 --> 01:06:00.840]  Right.
[01:06:00.840 --> 01:06:06.840]  So one element by itself creates transportation. All of the elements have to be there.
[01:06:06.840 --> 01:06:16.840]  Correct. Yeah, and that's what makes me angry is because it's not used as a vehicle by definition. It's not used to transport anything.
[01:06:16.840 --> 01:06:23.840]  I'm simply traveling with it to the job. But the conflict comes into where you're right.
[01:06:23.840 --> 01:06:29.840]  If you get stopped, they'll want to not let you move it or impound it, and that's going to get costly.
[01:06:29.840 --> 01:06:32.840]  They don't want to make the fight on that particular truck either.
[01:06:32.840 --> 01:06:39.840]  Well, this is where they have put you in a catch-22 when it comes to fighting back. Everybody, not just you, but everybody.
[01:06:39.840 --> 01:06:47.840]  And that in order to do what you have to do on a regular basis, you have to be part of what they're doing, which is fraud.
[01:06:47.840 --> 01:06:58.840]  Because there's no way out of it without suffering the hardship that they also put upon you for not being a willing participant in their fraud and allowing them to defraud you.
[01:06:58.840 --> 01:07:09.840]  It's all a sham fraud game. But the problem is, is they get to play both sides of the fences and get to rewrite the rules on the fly as to how they work.
[01:07:09.840 --> 01:07:20.840]  That's what's rigged about the system, is that it's only solid when it comes to you and me, and it's amorphous when it comes to them.
[01:07:20.840 --> 01:07:31.840]  Correct. No, that's very true. And unless the problems you deal with, on principle, you want to fight it all across the board.
[01:07:31.840 --> 01:07:38.840]  I don't want to. It's like, if I don't have to do it, why should I? But it's like, well, this is the rest of the evil.
[01:07:38.840 --> 01:07:44.840]  Well, this is why I say this is not something we're going to be able to fix through the form.
[01:07:44.840 --> 01:07:52.840]  It's going to take a civil war, or everybody just throwing down their authority and walking away, and that is never going to happen.
[01:07:52.840 --> 01:08:01.840]  No state in the history of man has ever relinquished any power it got its hands on in a peaceable manner. Not one.
[01:08:01.840 --> 01:08:15.840]  True. Yeah. And another problem is that the courts are, well, unless you can get an honest jury that can...
[01:08:15.840 --> 01:08:22.840]  You can't get an honest jury if you don't have an informed jury that knows the law and the facts surrounding what we're talking about, and they don't.
[01:08:22.840 --> 01:08:30.840]  And they will not be allowed to know. So there is no honest jury to save you.
[01:08:30.840 --> 01:08:39.840]  The only thing you may get is saved by a jury because they simply don't like it any better than you, but that doesn't mean they understood it.
[01:08:39.840 --> 01:08:51.840]  Correct. Correct. Real quick question. I apologize, but along that line, a couple other autos would just use private redeem, but they're older.
[01:08:51.840 --> 01:08:56.840]  And I'm thinking there is something called an antique gag that you only have to get once.
[01:08:56.840 --> 01:09:07.840]  Yeah, but then you're limited into when the car can be used. It can only be driven to and from places of show and for maintenance and repairs.
[01:09:07.840 --> 01:09:13.840]  It can't be used for anything else. If you look, you'll find that's the conditions of those tags.
[01:09:13.840 --> 01:09:27.840]  No, I read that. I read that. But I also think that you can't use it to transport persons and property, which were not my definition, but correct. They say also that it can only be used by going to shows and stuff like that, which...
[01:09:27.840 --> 01:09:29.840]  So that wouldn't be an option.
[01:09:29.840 --> 01:09:32.840]  Not for everyday use, it wouldn't be.
[01:09:32.840 --> 01:09:47.840]  Yeah, yeah. Well, he was... Well, I think my dad was talking about getting... He wanted to get like you did, but he didn't know where to get him. A private auto plate. Do you have any ideas how we could get one of those made up, but we're...
[01:09:47.840 --> 01:09:59.840]  Well, I made mine, and then I had them printed up. You can go online and make any plate you want from some of these metal plate makers, and they'll print it out to whatever you want.
[01:09:59.840 --> 01:10:10.840]  Okay. Okay. So we were given advice to start... You know, they say you should adjust your remedies in mind before seeing.
[01:10:10.840 --> 01:10:19.840]  I know you don't think it worked. I think you asked you this once, but could you write a form letter like the head of the DOT and possibly a sheriff? Maybe...
[01:10:19.840 --> 01:10:30.840]  You can write anything you want. Doesn't mean it's going to get anything done for you. Doesn't mean it's going to turn any heads or anything else.
[01:10:30.840 --> 01:10:44.840]  What it may do is trigger someone into coming at you just to make an example of you or setting you up to be kept an eye on so that if you do something, then they can come down on you like a ton of bricks.
[01:10:44.840 --> 01:10:52.840]  We were thinking that too. See, there's a reason why people going into battle against the enemy prefer the element of surprise.
[01:10:52.840 --> 01:11:05.840]  Correct. But if you get in, you're right. I don't disagree, but if you get in, let's say we do this lawsuit and the judge says I could just see him stay in first thing.
[01:11:05.840 --> 01:11:12.840]  How come you didn't write a letter? I mean, how come you didn't try to get this resolved, you know, outside of court or whatever? I mean, what's your response going to be?
[01:11:12.840 --> 01:11:24.840]  Like I said, I didn't say that you couldn't do it, but the fact is that you have challenged these tickets in courts just to have the courts piss all over the arguments without bothering to apply the law, right?
[01:11:24.840 --> 01:11:25.840]  Correct.
[01:11:25.840 --> 01:11:37.840]  Okay. So how do you obtain remedy from an agency who is getting assisted by the courts and committing a fraud so that they may continue it on an ongoing basis?
[01:11:37.840 --> 01:11:48.840]  Now, would it be better to document it through those things? Absolutely. But my point and what I said was if you expect the letter writing to be your solution, think again.
[01:11:48.840 --> 01:12:01.840]  Building a paper trail is a completely different thing. You send them a request for information. Now, they don't have to answer it unless it's related to a public record.
[01:12:01.840 --> 01:12:15.840]  They don't have to do legal research. They don't have to educate you. They only have to produce public records. So you're going to catch 22 as to how you get the answers you need from the people you need them from when they cannot give you legal advice.
[01:12:15.840 --> 01:12:34.840]  They cannot give you anything that isn't an actual record. They can't tell you what law to look up or anything else because that's legal research. The public information laws are written to keep their participation in providing remedy to the public at a minimum.
[01:12:34.840 --> 01:12:35.840]  Yeah.
[01:12:35.840 --> 01:12:44.840]  Which leaves the onus of fighting anything they do entirely on us.
[01:12:44.840 --> 01:12:53.840]  I think you probably already answered the question, but so could you do it in the form of a public records act request asking which of those laws to possibly apply?
[01:12:53.840 --> 01:12:56.840]  No, because that is legal research.
[01:12:56.840 --> 01:12:58.840]  And that's what they would say.
[01:12:58.840 --> 01:13:05.840]  That's exactly what they would say. You asked us a question about what law. That's legal research.
[01:13:05.840 --> 01:13:14.840]  Yeah. So you could do it in the form of a questionnaire and just an actual letter which would probably be ignored.
[01:13:14.840 --> 01:13:25.840]  Another question, should you throw the book at them? I mean, just let them know that you know the law and then explain it to them or just kind of keep it brief and to the point.
[01:13:25.840 --> 01:13:28.840]  I mean, how would you do that if you were going to write them?
[01:13:28.840 --> 01:13:38.840]  The more you try to teach, tell them that you know the law and they obviously don't, the less you're going to get out of them to begin with.
[01:13:38.840 --> 01:13:39.840]  Okay.
[01:13:39.840 --> 01:13:52.840]  What you need to do is try to make friends with somebody that knows this stuff. If you're not going to dig through the law library and find it all yourself.
[01:13:52.840 --> 01:13:59.840]  Well, I did quite a bit of research. The only thing I couldn't find is that re-cautified building you talked about.
[01:13:59.840 --> 01:14:08.840]  But I found one that was close in the laws of 1992. It was in a reorganization act of Wyoming state government.
[01:14:08.840 --> 01:14:18.840]  And it called, for example, the Department of Motor Vehicles, Registering, Licensing, all those things. It classified those as transportation related.
[01:14:18.840 --> 01:14:19.840]  Yeah.
[01:14:19.840 --> 01:14:23.840]  But is transportation defined in any of y'all's law?
[01:14:23.840 --> 01:14:24.840]  No.
[01:14:24.840 --> 01:14:25.840]  Okay.
[01:14:25.840 --> 01:14:32.840]  So where is transportation defined? Where's the law that says what definition would apply if the law itself doesn't give one?
[01:14:32.840 --> 01:14:39.840]  Where's the law that covers statutory interpretation? Where's the law that covers construction of laws in Wyoming?
[01:14:39.840 --> 01:14:40.840]  Correct.
[01:14:40.840 --> 01:14:52.840]  No, I found case law that defined it as well as other cases that say the legal meaning applies. I found a case from 59 that said that the legal meaning applies if it's not defined elsewhere.
[01:14:52.840 --> 01:14:57.840]  So the legal meaning would be just basically what was in Black's law or cases.
[01:14:57.840 --> 01:14:59.840]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:14:59.840 --> 01:15:21.840]  Again, if you have a state statute that says that they are required to apply terms of art in a manner according to how experts in the art profession or occupation define and use the term, then no, that is not where you go first.
[01:15:21.840 --> 01:15:36.840]  You have to find the common meaning of that term as experts in the particular art, occupation, or profession use and define that term.
[01:15:36.840 --> 01:15:37.840]  Okay.
[01:15:37.840 --> 01:15:38.840]  Okay.
[01:15:38.840 --> 01:15:43.840]  Here in Texas, that's chapters 311 and 312 of the Texas government code.
[01:15:43.840 --> 01:16:02.840]  So you need to find out what they are in Wyoming. One is called statutory interpretation of statutes. The other is creation of laws.
[01:16:02.840 --> 01:16:05.840]  Statutory interpretation of statutes.
[01:16:05.840 --> 01:16:10.840]  Just statutory interpretation.
[01:16:10.840 --> 01:16:12.840]  And creation of laws.
[01:16:12.840 --> 01:16:18.840]  That's what it is here. I don't know what it's going to be called in Wyoming. That's what it is here.
[01:16:18.840 --> 01:16:27.840]  Now, define that a little bit because I kind of, I get what you're saying, but yet it's a little bit foggy to me. I don't quite understand.
[01:16:27.840 --> 01:16:28.840]  Okay.
[01:16:28.840 --> 01:16:37.840]  For instance, chapter 311, Code Construction Act. That's what it's actually called, the Code Construction Act.
[01:16:37.840 --> 01:16:38.840]  Okay.
[01:16:38.840 --> 01:16:47.840]  It says exactly how every term, phrase, word, and structure of a statute is to be understood, interpreted, and applied.
[01:16:47.840 --> 01:16:51.840]  Then chapter 312 is construction of laws.
[01:16:51.840 --> 01:16:55.840]  Hang on just a second. I've got a break coming up and then we'll do this again, okay?
[01:16:55.840 --> 01:16:57.840]  Okay.
[01:16:57.840 --> 01:17:08.840]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[01:17:08.840 --> 01:17:14.840]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.840 --> 01:17:20.840]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:17:20.840 --> 01:17:26.840]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.840 --> 01:17:28.840]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:28.840 --> 01:17:33.840]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:17:33.840 --> 01:17:40.840]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.840 --> 01:17:49.840]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.840 --> 01:17:59.840]  Visit ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:17:59.840 --> 01:18:04.840]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.840 --> 01:18:08.840]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.840 --> 01:18:19.840]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[01:18:19.840 --> 01:18:21.840]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.840 --> 01:18:26.840]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:26.840 --> 01:18:31.840]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.840 --> 01:18:34.840]  Now, go to www.LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.840 --> 01:18:42.840]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:42.840 --> 01:18:43.840]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:43.840 --> 01:18:44.840]  No.
[01:18:44.840 --> 01:18:46.840]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:46.840 --> 01:18:47.840]  No.
[01:18:47.840 --> 01:18:48.840]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:48.840 --> 01:18:49.840]  No.
[01:18:49.840 --> 01:18:50.840]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:50.840 --> 01:18:56.840]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.840 --> 01:18:57.840]  We are logos.
[01:18:57.840 --> 01:18:59.840]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:18:59.840 --> 01:19:04.840]  Logos?
[01:19:04.840 --> 01:19:10.840]  Logos. Logos. Radio. Network.
[01:19:10.840 --> 01:19:33.840]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I take a look at my life and realize there's much left because I've been practicing and laughing so long that even my mama thinks that my mind...
[01:19:33.840 --> 01:19:41.840]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:41.840 --> 01:19:44.840]  All right. Now, back to Tyler in Wyoming.
[01:19:44.840 --> 01:19:50.840]  Okay. Chapter 311 and 312. 311 is Code Construction Act. 312 is Construction of Laws.
[01:19:50.840 --> 01:19:54.840]  You will be looking for something similar to that in the Wyoming Code.
[01:19:54.840 --> 01:20:08.840]  That will tell you exactly how any undefined term or phrase of art is required to be used, and transportation is a term of art in relation to statutory law.
[01:20:08.840 --> 01:20:11.840]  What do you mean by art? Is that like profession?
[01:20:11.840 --> 01:20:14.840]  Look up term of art.
[01:20:14.840 --> 01:20:17.840]  Okay.
[01:20:17.840 --> 01:20:24.840]  Okay, it'll either be word of art or term of art or phrase of art.
[01:20:24.840 --> 01:20:28.840]  Okay. Yeah, I know you've got other collars ready and you've been out.
[01:20:28.840 --> 01:20:38.840]  No, I don't have other collars, but you have to make the effort to figure something out for yourself. It sticks better when you have to do it.
[01:20:38.840 --> 01:20:40.840]  Okay.
[01:20:40.840 --> 01:20:58.840]  No, that's what I'm trying to do. It's just the thing is we're still traveling, but we know we're just ending up in court every single time, and it's like we're wanting to get a permanent solution.
[01:20:58.840 --> 01:21:09.840]  Well, there is no permanent solution until we put these masters in a prison somewhere. Until that happens, we're stuck with what they're doing and just having to fight it on individual battles.
[01:21:09.840 --> 01:21:15.840]  As long as it's us against them one-on-one, we lose.
[01:21:15.840 --> 01:21:30.840]  No, I agree. We've got the deck deck against us, but you know, either way you look at it in terms, they are violating our rights. I mean, we have a right to travel, which is a federal fence.
[01:21:30.840 --> 01:21:34.840]  I mean, it's not like we don't have remedy, but the problem is if we're going to another...
[01:21:34.840 --> 01:21:48.840]  No, I'm telling you right now, you don't really have remedy, because like I told you in the beginning, the system is rigged against you. If it weren't, the system would have already stopped itself from doing what it's doing because it's plain as day.
[01:21:48.840 --> 01:21:50.840]  They can't do it.
[01:21:50.840 --> 01:21:52.840]  Correct.
[01:21:52.840 --> 01:22:03.840]  But they can't make the money if they can't steal it from us. So how do they steal it through illegal taxation methods? What taxation? Licensing.
[01:22:03.840 --> 01:22:14.840]  Yeah, yeah. But in all fairness, and I'm not trying to put you on a pedestal, but haven't you had some success where you're at fighting these things?
[01:22:14.840 --> 01:22:20.840]  Yes, but I still have to fight them every time there is one.
[01:22:20.840 --> 01:22:25.840]  Okay, so you're saying you still get stopped on occasion and they'll still fight the system?
[01:22:25.840 --> 01:22:38.840]  Well, I haven't been stopped in a very long time. Okay, but that's beside the point. That doesn't mean that I couldn't go somewhere new and start all over again with fighting there.
[01:22:38.840 --> 01:22:46.840]  So is that because they kind of got to know you in the jurisdiction and they just probably figure you're more trouble than you're worth?
[01:22:46.840 --> 01:22:51.840]  I hazard to guess as to why they chose to choose to do what they do.
[01:22:51.840 --> 01:23:00.840]  Well, and that would be, you know, a possible thing to where they get to know us and we're hoping that will happen.
[01:23:00.840 --> 01:23:07.840]  You know, we just kind of want to be left alone and allowed to, you know, live like an American should be able to.
[01:23:07.840 --> 01:23:13.840]  The founder is kind of a vision. As long as you don't hurt anybody, there's no cause of action.
[01:23:13.840 --> 01:23:22.840]  And those licenses don't apply to us. It's been verified in the law to leave us alone, you know, unless we cause some damage or some kind.
[01:23:22.840 --> 01:23:38.840]  And what we're asking for is not an unfair request, but it just seems like for law's sake, no one's ever told that, you know, that if you're not in transportation, you know, it only applies to transportation.
[01:23:38.840 --> 01:23:43.840]  It's like the officers don't even know. Well, you mentioned that.
[01:23:43.840 --> 01:23:52.840]  It doesn't matter if they know it. The fact is that the system had a duty to tell them and it didn't and it hit it on purpose.
[01:23:52.840 --> 01:23:58.840]  Right. And that was probably because of the money, correct? I mean.
[01:23:58.840 --> 01:24:00.840]  Well, why else would it be?
[01:24:00.840 --> 01:24:09.840]  Well, it's one of the reasons. Not only do they get money, but they get absolute control of your control and monitoring of our movements.
[01:24:09.840 --> 01:24:13.840]  Correct. Correct.
[01:24:13.840 --> 01:24:23.840]  And that is their greatest fear is when we can move without them knowing where we are, especially if you're one of those they consider dangerous to their existence.
[01:24:23.840 --> 01:24:31.840]  Right. But it does go back to the crux is the argument you're right. They can't turn a right into privilege.
[01:24:31.840 --> 01:24:46.840]  And it's always been a right to travel. And I appreciate some of the cases that you had in your research that said that one of them said that you had an absolute right to choose your mode of choice and to travel on the highway.
[01:24:46.840 --> 01:24:47.840]  Yes.
[01:24:47.840 --> 01:24:55.840]  And I found another case out of I think it was Kansas that said that you have an absolute right to travel by automobile.
[01:24:55.840 --> 01:25:03.840]  But parking cars on the streets was not a right. And what they were talking about there was like parking meters and stuff like that.
[01:25:03.840 --> 01:25:09.840]  So I found a couple more cases also to map staff.
[01:25:09.840 --> 01:25:19.840]  And one of the problems that we've noticed when we make some of these fights, though, is what they'll do. The opposition, they'll take the facts, the law and the baseball.
[01:25:19.840 --> 01:25:22.840]  What are we having this time? They'll just ignore it.
[01:25:22.840 --> 01:25:29.840]  And then they'll just go back. Oh, you have your driver operator motor vehicle. They'll just kind of ignore your whole argument.
[01:25:29.840 --> 01:25:41.840]  Well, but that's what I'm saying is that they're trying to apply the object of a code outside of the subject of the code. And that's one of the things they cannot do.
[01:25:41.840 --> 01:25:45.840]  It is a complete violation of the single subject clause.
[01:25:45.840 --> 01:26:06.840]  When they do it that way, they are converting statutory objects into statutory subjects, which violates the legislation from the get go because the bill that created those objects is limited to only one subject.
[01:26:06.840 --> 01:26:20.840]  So you can't say that you're an operator of a motor vehicle to objects of the subject of transportation and then ignore the issue and nonexistence of transportation.
[01:26:20.840 --> 01:26:29.840]  Because without transportation, there is no motor vehicle or operator or driver or anything else.
[01:26:29.840 --> 01:26:36.840]  Absolutely. And the very first thing is to object to those terms when we go into court.
[01:26:36.840 --> 01:26:48.840]  Absolutely. Objection, assumes facts not in evidence, requires a legal conclusion. I mean all kinds of things. Not previously agreed to.
[01:26:48.840 --> 01:26:53.840]  Assumes facts not in evidence, not previously agreed to and requires a legal conclusion.
[01:26:53.840 --> 01:27:06.840]  Right. Right. Well, it even says in our code out here, it says if somebody is found to be in control of a vehicle, it will be rebuttably presumed that they will be the owner.
[01:27:06.840 --> 01:27:07.840]  And that was the exact term.
[01:27:07.840 --> 01:27:12.840]  Right. Well, you can rebut any presumption of law they make.
[01:27:12.840 --> 01:27:21.840]  And that is a presumption of law when they say motor vehicle, operator, driver, whatever.
[01:27:21.840 --> 01:27:30.840]  Correct. Now, when you rebut that and you object to that, it is the plaintiff's job at that point, they have to verify it, correct? They have to.
[01:27:30.840 --> 01:27:33.840]  They have to prove it.
[01:27:33.840 --> 01:27:36.840]  Right. And they never do. They never can.
[01:27:36.840 --> 01:27:50.840]  No, they don't. But most people don't continue to challenge it every time they say they have because they allow them to keep making the same false allegations by using the terms associated with transportation.
[01:27:50.840 --> 01:28:05.840]  Every time you let them get away without objection to asserting an object of transportation, you have allowed them to introduce evidence against you saying you actually were in transportation.
[01:28:05.840 --> 01:28:10.840]  That's right. And that, you know, that is fraud and a scam.
[01:28:10.840 --> 01:28:15.840]  It absolutely is. But that's what the attorneys have given us.
[01:28:15.840 --> 01:28:26.840]  Yeah. Yeah. And I tell people that. I was like, does not make you angry, you know, when you're going into a court and you shouldn't even be there. You're not even in the subject matter.
[01:28:26.840 --> 01:28:36.840]  And they don't even give it a thought. They just think that when they're traveling down the highway, that's the same thing as driving because that is a common English term, drive.
[01:28:36.840 --> 01:28:44.840]  I'm going to go drive to the store. But that's not what that term means when it's defined in the motor vehicle code. And most people don't know.
[01:28:44.840 --> 01:28:47.840]  It's also not the same use.
[01:28:47.840 --> 01:28:50.840]  It's not the same use. Correct.
[01:28:50.840 --> 01:29:00.840]  Well, I appreciate you. I thank you for what you're doing. And like I said, you've given us a lot of help out here and we've had some success.
[01:29:00.840 --> 01:29:09.840]  I'm not saying this is all been in vain. We're just kind of hoping for a permanent solution if we can find one.
[01:29:09.840 --> 01:29:16.840]  And we know it's an uphill battle, but we're searching for it. So I'm just trying to get the answers on how to secure it a little better.
[01:29:16.840 --> 01:29:20.840]  Well, I wish you continued luck.
[01:29:20.840 --> 01:29:30.840]  Well, that's a nice one for what you do. And one more question real quick. Your friend Dave Champion's got a book out. He specializes in IRS and SCAM.
[01:29:30.840 --> 01:29:33.840]  Income tax shattering the myths. Yeah.
[01:29:33.840 --> 01:29:39.840]  That's what I needed. What's the name? Can you get ready? Would you purchase that up?
[01:29:39.840 --> 01:29:42.840]  Taxrevolt.us.
[01:29:42.840 --> 01:29:45.840]  Okay.
[01:29:45.840 --> 01:29:51.840]  Thanks much. You're welcome. God bless you. You too, man. Take care.
[01:29:51.840 --> 01:29:59.840]  All right, folks, we have another break coming up. I got no callers left. I got a half an hour left in the show. Somebody give me a call so we can talk.
[01:29:59.840 --> 01:30:09.840]  Radio frequency identification, or RFID, is a technology that silently tracks objects using radio waves. But what if the object is you?
[01:30:09.840 --> 01:30:15.840]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with a buzz on just how invasive this stealthy technology can be.
[01:30:15.840 --> 01:30:25.840]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.840 --> 01:30:33.840]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.840 --> 01:30:41.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.840 --> 01:30:44.840]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.840 --> 01:30:49.840]  RFID microchips were used for a recent study on the habits of honeybees.
[01:30:49.840 --> 01:30:56.840]  Researchers tracked each bee individually through an RFID tag glued to its back that beamed back a unique identification number.
[01:30:56.840 --> 01:31:05.840]  When tagged bees flew through an antenna probe in fake flowers, the scientists instantly knew. But the bees didn't since RFID waves are silent and invisible.
[01:31:05.840 --> 01:31:14.840]  Major corporations want to put similar RFID tags in all consumer items, making people aware and carry those items trackable, just like the bees.
[01:31:14.840 --> 01:31:23.840]  Bee studies clearly demonstrate how RFID could deliver a stinging blow to our freedom and privacy. Join me in opposing this invasive technology.
[01:31:23.840 --> 01:31:29.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albright. More news and information at CatherineAlbright.com.
[01:31:29.840 --> 01:31:38.840]  I lost my son. My uncle. My uncle. My son. On September 11, 2000. Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:38.840 --> 01:31:42.840]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, is not hit by a plane.
[01:31:42.840 --> 01:31:46.920]  The official explanation is that fire brought down building seven over
[01:31:46.920 --> 01:31:50.680]  one thousand two hundred architects and engineers looked into the evidence and
[01:31:50.680 --> 01:31:54.920]  believed there is more to the story bring justice to my son my uncle my nephew
[01:31:54.920 --> 01:32:00.360]  my son go to building what dot org why it fell why it matters as what you can do
[01:32:01.960 --> 01:32:05.560]  rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic similar in today's
[01:32:05.560 --> 01:32:08.760]  america we live in an us against them society if we the people are ever going
[01:32:08.760 --> 01:32:12.600]  to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[01:32:12.600 --> 01:32:15.480]  among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place the
[01:32:15.480 --> 01:32:18.600]  right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to do
[01:32:18.600 --> 01:32:22.280]  process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to
[01:32:22.280 --> 01:32:25.720]  learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process former
[01:32:25.720 --> 01:32:28.600]  sheriff's deputy eddie craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has
[01:32:28.600 --> 01:32:31.400]  put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help
[01:32:31.400 --> 01:32:35.160]  you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law
[01:32:35.160 --> 01:32:37.960]  you can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule
[01:32:37.960 --> 01:32:41.320]  of law radio dot com and ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll
[01:32:41.320 --> 01:32:44.680]  receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation code the law versus the
[01:32:44.680 --> 01:32:48.440]  lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research
[01:32:48.440 --> 01:32:51.480]  documents and other useful resource material learn how to fight for your
[01:32:51.480 --> 01:32:54.440]  rights with the help of this material from rule of law radio dot com
[01:32:54.440 --> 01:32:57.960]  order your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want to
[01:32:57.960 --> 01:33:12.680]  deserve you're listening to the logos radio network at logo's radio network
[01:33:28.680 --> 01:33:38.680]  so
[01:33:48.920 --> 01:33:54.440]  hi folks we are back this is rule of law radio calling number five one two six
[01:33:54.440 --> 01:33:58.280]  four six nineteen eighty four if you want to call and talk about something
[01:33:58.280 --> 01:34:06.280]  right now caller board is empty okay now all the things that we talked about
[01:34:06.280 --> 01:34:11.080]  with these folks tonight if you'll notice there was a trend to this
[01:34:11.080 --> 01:34:15.960]  either they're not reading everything in the statute and understanding what
[01:34:15.960 --> 01:34:19.800]  they're reading or they're reading something and then
[01:34:19.800 --> 01:34:22.680]  immediately blowing it right out of their minds as far as
[01:34:22.680 --> 01:34:28.200]  relevance to what's happening in the statute
[01:34:28.200 --> 01:34:32.760]  there is there is a particular art to reading and understanding what is
[01:34:32.760 --> 01:34:35.800]  written in this in the statute believe me
[01:34:35.800 --> 01:34:39.640]  and it's taken me a while originally to figure that out
[01:34:39.640 --> 01:34:44.840]  but once i did figure it out it it's kind of like
[01:34:44.840 --> 01:34:48.520]  when you do something for a really long time it becomes very very
[01:34:48.520 --> 01:34:52.920]  easy to quickly spot where somebody else is doing
[01:34:52.920 --> 01:34:57.240]  something that's not going to work the way they think it will
[01:34:57.240 --> 01:35:01.560]  because you you tried the same thing in the beginning yourself and you know
[01:35:01.560 --> 01:35:04.760]  exactly where it led you and exactly how it turned out
[01:35:04.760 --> 01:35:08.520]  so you already know why it's going to fail
[01:35:08.520 --> 01:35:12.760]  and you have the option of either allowing them to
[01:35:12.760 --> 01:35:16.520]  figure it out for themselves by allowing them to make that same mistake
[01:35:16.520 --> 01:35:20.120]  and thus ingrain that experience into themselves so that they know what not to
[01:35:20.120 --> 01:35:25.080]  do next time or you can try to explain to them why
[01:35:25.080 --> 01:35:28.920]  it's not going to work and then show them
[01:35:28.920 --> 01:35:32.440]  where it would have led them and if they'll do it this way then they'll get
[01:35:32.440 --> 01:35:35.800]  what they want and it'll work a lot better
[01:35:35.800 --> 01:35:39.560]  the problem i have found in either case is nobody appreciates what you're doing
[01:35:39.560 --> 01:35:43.400]  for them they really don't if you don't give
[01:35:43.400 --> 01:35:46.440]  them the answer and they find out that you knew and you saw that they were
[01:35:46.440 --> 01:35:49.720]  having a problem with it and yet you said nothing
[01:35:49.720 --> 01:35:53.320]  then they accuse you of not wanting to help them out
[01:35:53.320 --> 01:35:58.040]  or not helping them save time by doing it or by
[01:35:58.040 --> 01:36:01.960]  what they call a job protection or career protection
[01:36:01.960 --> 01:36:06.120]  for yourself by not giving information that you have
[01:36:06.120 --> 01:36:10.120]  and keeping it closely guarded so that others don't have it
[01:36:10.120 --> 01:36:14.840]  until they figure it out for themselves etc etc and just so on and so on and so
[01:36:14.840 --> 01:36:19.240]  on the mindset of people about
[01:36:19.240 --> 01:36:23.880]  learning these days is astounding to me
[01:36:23.880 --> 01:36:28.200]  there's people in my facebook group that they would rather ask a question about
[01:36:28.200 --> 01:36:32.040]  what something is or where something is or how something should be done
[01:36:32.040 --> 01:36:36.760]  then they would make any effort at all to figure it out for themselves first
[01:36:36.760 --> 01:36:43.480]  and i don't i don't do that i say look i'm going to answer questions that
[01:36:43.480 --> 01:36:46.600]  that show me that you've already at least done the work
[01:36:46.600 --> 01:36:49.720]  but you've also done the work to the degree that you notice there's a
[01:36:49.720 --> 01:36:53.240]  discrepancy that the law itself doesn't deal with and you need
[01:36:53.240 --> 01:36:56.520]  help figuring out why and what to do about it
[01:36:56.520 --> 01:37:01.480]  that's completely different from hey how many times can i file a motion before
[01:37:01.480 --> 01:37:04.920]  the court can tell me they're not going to take any more motions
[01:37:04.920 --> 01:37:08.040]  well gee dude did you read the code of criminal procedure because
[01:37:08.040 --> 01:37:11.960]  that tells you flat out what a motions hearing is
[01:37:11.960 --> 01:37:16.920]  when a motions hearing can be held what the local rules of court do or do not
[01:37:16.920 --> 01:37:21.480]  do in relation to a motions hearing what it does to the time frames on motions
[01:37:21.480 --> 01:37:25.640]  hearings etc etc etc had you bothered to read any
[01:37:25.640 --> 01:37:29.160]  part of the code of criminal procedure dealing with that issue you would have
[01:37:29.160 --> 01:37:32.200]  gotten your answer without having to come here and ask
[01:37:32.200 --> 01:37:37.080]  so why aren't you doing the studying well i'm doing it for the experience
[01:37:37.080 --> 01:37:43.560]  look dude you get experience by doing not by asking others to do for you
[01:37:43.560 --> 01:37:47.880]  that's not experience okay
[01:37:48.120 --> 01:37:53.160]  so it's it's just one of those things where i don't know how we have survived
[01:37:53.160 --> 01:37:56.600]  this long i really really don't i don't know how the
[01:37:56.600 --> 01:38:00.920]  they have not managed to pull the wool over eyes much much faster than this
[01:38:00.920 --> 01:38:04.360]  to get the new world order they want and to get us all working for them to a
[01:38:04.360 --> 01:38:07.240]  degree that we'll never be able to get out from under
[01:38:07.240 --> 01:38:10.920]  civil war or not because by then they would have already had
[01:38:10.920 --> 01:38:15.560]  gun control in place all of us disarmed and now we're completely at the mercy
[01:38:15.560 --> 01:38:20.360]  of a totalitarian government but we aren't far from that
[01:38:20.360 --> 01:38:25.480]  don't get me wrong but i'm just surprised it hasn't gotten
[01:38:25.480 --> 01:38:31.560]  to that stage much much sooner based upon what i see and hear
[01:38:31.560 --> 01:38:37.320]  from people every day that just don't want to do
[01:38:37.320 --> 01:38:40.760]  their own work they they're just flat out lazy
[01:38:40.760 --> 01:38:44.200]  i don't know what it is and i don't understand it
[01:38:44.200 --> 01:38:48.840]  but one of these days you're going to look around and that's going to be the
[01:38:48.840 --> 01:38:52.520]  same person sitting in the foxhole with you unfortunately they'll be the one
[01:38:52.520 --> 01:38:57.480]  over there crying uh instead of shooting but
[01:38:57.480 --> 01:39:05.240]  you know here we are now if i'm not going to give you
[01:39:05.240 --> 01:39:08.040]  callers that's going to leave me another segment of the show here
[01:39:08.040 --> 01:39:11.400]  where i can go on and on about how much we need you to donate
[01:39:11.400 --> 01:39:15.400]  how much we need your money because we do we can't do what we do without your
[01:39:15.400 --> 01:39:19.720]  money because we can't uh so on and so on and so on which i will
[01:39:19.720 --> 01:39:22.760]  do if i must i'd much rather talk to callers
[01:39:22.760 --> 01:39:26.440]  but i don't have any ah wait we have charles in washington
[01:39:26.440 --> 01:39:30.120]  who happens to call in four and a half minutes before the next break
[01:39:30.120 --> 01:39:33.240]  so i'll have him for the next segment at least
[01:39:33.240 --> 01:39:37.320]  all right charles what can we do for you
[01:39:37.960 --> 01:39:43.800]  hello charles you're close today well hold on hold on you you had two two
[01:39:43.800 --> 01:39:48.360]  things up on the board here did you drop and call back
[01:39:48.360 --> 01:39:52.120]  huh did you drop and call back in
[01:39:52.120 --> 01:39:55.640]  uh yeah i did drop and call back okay because you were up on the board twice
[01:39:55.640 --> 01:39:58.760]  and i clicked on the wrong one when i started talking to you so i did not
[01:39:58.760 --> 01:40:03.640]  get what you answered from the very beginning so start over
[01:40:03.640 --> 01:40:09.800]  okay so i went to court today and i listened to the archive archive and i
[01:40:09.800 --> 01:40:13.960]  took everything off that you told me to say so i went in because i didn't get to
[01:40:13.960 --> 01:40:17.400]  file it you know before that's i went in and i said everything
[01:40:17.400 --> 01:40:20.040]  but i'm i'm really respectful i'm going to just
[01:40:20.040 --> 01:40:23.720]  i'll talk to me on a special appearance and then going to what you had said
[01:40:23.720 --> 01:40:26.920]  i let them say do what they do but i made sure i said i'm in a special
[01:40:26.920 --> 01:40:30.840]  appearance that you said to do that so after that the judge proceeded to try
[01:40:30.840 --> 01:40:35.720]  to get me to sign a attorney on board i wouldn't do that
[01:40:35.720 --> 01:40:39.880]  and then i told her why and then she wouldn't tell the prosecution
[01:40:39.880 --> 01:40:43.720]  which way i was coming and so the judge proceeded to
[01:40:43.720 --> 01:40:47.560]  try to give me that admit that i understood the two charges and i would
[01:40:47.560 --> 01:40:50.920]  not tell him i don't understand you have to be free time and then i told him i
[01:40:50.920 --> 01:40:54.200]  said i feel like i'm express and i said so
[01:40:54.200 --> 01:40:57.640]  therefore no i'm not i'm not proceeding for the state i'm not
[01:40:57.640 --> 01:41:02.200]  agreeing anything i denied everything and so he went ahead and made a plea
[01:41:02.200 --> 01:41:05.720]  because i wouldn't make a plea so that would be raining hearing
[01:41:05.720 --> 01:41:08.440]  and i i wasn't going to tell you i would like to make a plea because i knew he
[01:41:08.440 --> 01:41:13.320]  didn't so he wouldn't let me state my statement so what i did i got another
[01:41:13.320 --> 01:41:16.680]  thing that i looked up and i said well i want i want
[01:41:16.680 --> 01:41:24.360]  i want to know if you have your foreign registration statement act of 1938
[01:41:24.360 --> 01:41:27.480]  and that shows that there are foreign entity in this country therefore having
[01:41:27.480 --> 01:41:30.760]  no jurisdiction either which was one of the documents i was going to send you
[01:41:30.760 --> 01:41:35.400]  and talk to you about so they told me to leave you know but don't drive unless i
[01:41:35.400 --> 01:41:40.120]  have a license and insurance make sure i come back at the next
[01:41:40.120 --> 01:41:44.040]  hearing and don't get him on the kind of ticket so i didn't acknowledge anything
[01:41:44.040 --> 01:41:46.920]  so i left i did just what i did i got my
[01:41:46.920 --> 01:41:51.080]  private auto bill and i left so the police came i took a picture
[01:41:51.080 --> 01:41:54.840]  and that was fine i left so at this point
[01:41:54.840 --> 01:41:57.960]  i'm closed so now i have to get the stuff from you that i didn't have all this
[01:41:57.960 --> 01:42:00.200]  time that you said i should have had so i could go
[01:42:00.200 --> 01:42:05.160]  here and and file this stuff in the court before i go to the next hearing
[01:42:05.160 --> 01:42:08.680]  when you say get stuff from me are you talking about the seminar
[01:42:08.680 --> 01:42:12.680]  this seminar equipment yeah okay well you can just go on the website and order
[01:42:12.680 --> 01:42:16.760]  that yeah yeah so i think that's in the same
[01:42:16.760 --> 01:42:21.000]  that's in the same website as local right yeah it's it's yeah go the logos
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:24.360]  radio network.com website and it'll be in that big black box
[01:42:24.360 --> 01:42:27.080]  there where the fundraiser is registered down at the bottom where it says get
[01:42:27.080 --> 01:42:31.560]  eddie's traffic seminar okay now you know when you told me how to go
[01:42:31.560 --> 01:42:35.720]  into this your website and how to pull everything up
[01:42:35.720 --> 01:42:39.560]  i didn't know my phone and i did it on a notepad you know it wasn't under that
[01:42:39.560 --> 01:42:43.240]  at all i just hit the website and it popped up all the
[01:42:43.240 --> 01:42:47.560]  conversation that you've had over the week so i didn't
[01:42:47.560 --> 01:42:50.920]  get to go up to the right or left or do any of that so we just put me into it
[01:42:50.920 --> 01:42:54.760]  but i'll try to go back in and see where you got that at
[01:42:54.760 --> 01:42:58.360]  and go ahead and file that stuff well i don't know how i'm talking about the way
[01:42:58.360 --> 01:43:03.960]  it looks when you do it from a pc i've never accessed our website from a
[01:43:03.960 --> 01:43:08.840]  mobile device like a cell phone so i don't know what the page takes you to
[01:43:08.840 --> 01:43:13.880]  directly when you go there instead of on a computer
[01:43:13.880 --> 01:43:18.360]  right so when i tell you something that's based upon how you access it via
[01:43:18.360 --> 01:43:22.520]  computer i try to minimize my internet usage on
[01:43:22.520 --> 01:43:27.000]  my phone okay so i don't ever visit websites
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:30.520]  except when i'm on the road somewhere and i have to get information that's the
[01:43:30.520 --> 01:43:34.920]  only time i use my phone for internet i got you okay
[01:43:34.920 --> 01:43:38.200]  well that's what i did because then i found out a little note tablet
[01:43:38.200 --> 01:43:41.160]  and i realized that it was the same thing as using my phone
[01:43:41.160 --> 01:43:44.360]  okay well hang on just a second Charles i got a break here and then we'll finish
[01:43:44.360 --> 01:43:49.000]  up on the other side okay okay thank you all right hang on
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:52.840]  all right folks this is rule of law radio we are going to the last segment of the
[01:43:52.840 --> 01:44:00.520]  show y'all hang on and we will be right back
[01:44:00.520 --> 01:44:04.440]  through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved
[01:44:04.440 --> 01:44:08.440]  except in the area of nutrition people feed their pets better than they feed
[01:44:08.440 --> 01:44:12.120]  themselves and it's time we changed all that our primary
[01:44:12.120 --> 01:44:15.160]  defense against aging and disease in this toxic
[01:44:15.160 --> 01:44:19.480]  environment is good nutrition in a world where natural fruits have been
[01:44:19.480 --> 01:44:23.320]  irradiated adulterated and mutilated young jevity
[01:44:23.320 --> 01:44:28.120]  can provide the nutrients you need logos radio network gets many requests to
[01:44:28.120 --> 01:44:31.640]  endorse all sorts of products most of which we reject
[01:44:31.640 --> 01:44:36.520]  we have come to trust young jevity so much we became a marketing distributor
[01:44:36.520 --> 01:44:40.040]  along with alex jones bin fuchs and many others
[01:44:40.040 --> 01:44:43.400]  when you order from logosradionetwork.com
[01:44:43.400 --> 01:44:47.640]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio
[01:44:47.640 --> 01:44:51.960]  as you realize the benefits of young jevity you may want to join us
[01:44:51.960 --> 01:44:55.320]  as a distributor you can experience improved health
[01:44:55.320 --> 01:44:59.000]  help your friends and family and increase your income
[01:44:59.000 --> 01:45:04.280]  order now are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit
[01:45:04.280 --> 01:45:08.520]  win your case without an attorney with jurist dictionary the affordable
[01:45:08.520 --> 01:45:14.040]  easy to understand four cd course that will show you how in 24 hours you
[01:45:14.040 --> 01:45:17.640]  step by step if you have a lawyer know what your
[01:45:17.640 --> 01:45:21.960]  lawyer should be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for
[01:45:21.960 --> 01:45:25.080]  yourself thousands have won with our step by
[01:45:25.080 --> 01:45:30.440]  step course and now you can too jurist dictionary was created by a licensed
[01:45:30.440 --> 01:45:34.600]  attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience
[01:45:34.600 --> 01:45:38.360]  even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should
[01:45:38.360 --> 01:45:42.600]  understand about the principles and practices that control our american
[01:45:42.600 --> 01:45:45.640]  courts you'll receive our audio classroom
[01:45:45.640 --> 01:45:49.720]  video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases
[01:45:49.720 --> 01:45:55.400]  pro se tactics and much more please visit rule of law radio dot com and
[01:45:55.400 --> 01:45:59.400]  click on the banner are called toll free 866
[01:45:59.400 --> 01:46:25.000]  law easy
[01:46:25.000 --> 01:46:29.960]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio we are now in the last
[01:46:29.960 --> 01:46:33.400]  segment of the show and we are talking to charles in
[01:46:33.400 --> 01:46:37.400]  washington all right charles go ahead okay so
[01:46:37.400 --> 01:46:41.080]  once i was talking about what i want you to put out here
[01:46:41.080 --> 01:46:44.600]  what should i have maybe done a little bit because i thought i was so
[01:46:44.600 --> 01:46:48.200]  well the things that i told you need to be filed in writing
[01:46:48.200 --> 01:46:54.360]  okay so what was the purpose of this court appearance
[01:46:54.360 --> 01:46:57.560]  um it was the first appearance i have to get the tip when they asked you to go
[01:46:57.560 --> 01:47:02.600]  and it was okay so that means and when is your next scheduled court appearance
[01:47:02.600 --> 01:47:07.880]  uh in may and how many days prior to that appearance do you have to have any
[01:47:07.880 --> 01:47:11.400]  written pleadings requests for discovery or anything like that done that
[01:47:11.400 --> 01:47:15.640]  you're going to have in the case i always thought it was two weeks
[01:47:15.640 --> 01:47:20.600]  don't think call the court and ask him what the local rules are on filing your
[01:47:20.600 --> 01:47:24.840]  pleadings in such and such kind of case
[01:47:24.840 --> 01:47:29.960]  how many days prior to the hearing must all these things be in
[01:47:29.960 --> 01:47:33.880]  okay i got you because they could have changed it i know it used to be two weeks
[01:47:33.880 --> 01:47:38.520]  well there's a statutory amount of time and then there's an exception to the
[01:47:38.520 --> 01:47:43.720]  statute that says local rules and every court's got them
[01:47:43.720 --> 01:47:46.680]  because they like to screw with the people in their area
[01:47:46.680 --> 01:47:52.600]  that want to come in there prepared and the court wants to make them unprepared
[01:47:52.600 --> 01:47:56.680]  that makes sense okay so i was going to do that tomorrow but i was going to i
[01:47:56.680 --> 01:48:00.120]  already went got the one document i already got what you told me
[01:48:00.120 --> 01:48:03.800]  i wrote it all out it wasn't that much but you told me what to say what to do
[01:48:03.800 --> 01:48:06.280]  so i just got to put that on the proper
[01:48:06.280 --> 01:48:11.000]  well what i told you in so many words on the radio you're right but what you
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:14.360]  need to sit down and write for a legal pleading it's going to be more than
[01:48:14.360 --> 01:48:18.760]  just a little bit because you need to supplement that legal pleading with the
[01:48:18.760 --> 01:48:23.880]  statutory references that back them up and any case law that supports those
[01:48:23.880 --> 01:48:29.400]  statutes and your interpretation of those statutes
[01:48:29.400 --> 01:48:36.360]  what i gave you was an outline what you need to do is flesh it out into a body
[01:48:36.360 --> 01:48:41.880]  i gave you a skeleton put some meat in on those bones
[01:48:41.880 --> 01:48:44.760]  or shoot okay and that's the difference where
[01:48:44.760 --> 01:48:48.120]  when you told me i gotta learn how to do this thing for myself
[01:48:48.120 --> 01:48:51.560]  and this is why i said okay i gotta find out where i go look up all these
[01:48:51.560 --> 01:48:55.320]  like you said the case laws and and statutory stuff
[01:48:55.320 --> 01:48:59.720]  well if you get an annotated version of the statutes that you need
[01:48:59.720 --> 01:49:03.640]  then the annotations are the case law or at least some of the case law on those
[01:49:03.640 --> 01:49:06.760]  statutes one of them may actually be exactly what
[01:49:06.760 --> 01:49:09.960]  you need one of them may reference a case that's
[01:49:09.960 --> 01:49:13.720]  exactly what you need it's a place to start but it's
[01:49:13.720 --> 01:49:17.480]  not definitive so what you need to do is go to some
[01:49:17.480 --> 01:49:24.840]  place like google scholar and do a search on your state
[01:49:24.840 --> 01:49:29.160]  and see if there are any higher level court cases in your state
[01:49:29.160 --> 01:49:32.600]  that deal with a specific statute for instance
[01:49:32.600 --> 01:49:39.560]  say transportation code section 32.05 just search for that for the state of
[01:49:39.560 --> 01:49:43.080]  whatever uh and see if there's any cases that
[01:49:43.080 --> 01:49:47.560]  deal specifically with it if there is read them see if any of them are on point
[01:49:47.560 --> 01:49:51.160]  with what you're doing and what you're saying and why you're saying it
[01:49:51.160 --> 01:49:56.920]  and if they are decide them along with whatever part of them agrees with you
[01:49:56.920 --> 01:50:01.160]  okay okay and there were there were two that i had
[01:50:01.160 --> 01:50:04.360]  along when you said you're talking and one was out of Thurston County
[01:50:04.360 --> 01:50:09.000]  and another one was in Kiddick County County the counties are irrelevant if
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:13.480]  they're covered by the same courts yeah they come by the same courts because
[01:50:13.480 --> 01:50:17.400]  they they had no license no registration and and it was dismissed
[01:50:17.400 --> 01:50:20.840]  but they wouldn't give me anything that you know is for public information
[01:50:20.840 --> 01:50:24.360]  they wouldn't let me have any of that information nor would they let me talk
[01:50:24.360 --> 01:50:29.080]  to the lawyer that filed it so i still have one of those sheets i don't have
[01:50:29.080 --> 01:50:31.800]  the other one but like i see what you said i gotta start
[01:50:31.800 --> 01:50:35.000]  putting the meat on the skeleton and i gotta figure out what to do so you said
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:43.800]  statutory cases based law and annotated on the statutes annotated is what
[01:50:43.800 --> 01:50:50.040]  they're called okay or the code annotated is what it's called
[01:50:50.040 --> 01:50:55.320]  cool but the annotation means court cases
[01:50:55.320 --> 01:51:03.560]  oh okay okay i got it but if you go on google scholar and set up
[01:51:03.560 --> 01:51:08.680]  and select your specific state and then you do your searches like i just
[01:51:08.680 --> 01:51:12.120]  described then you're going to find almost any
[01:51:12.120 --> 01:51:16.920]  case that you could find in the annotated codes that way
[01:51:16.920 --> 01:51:21.640]  okay all right yeah i'm i'm writing it down as i talk that's why i said let me
[01:51:21.640 --> 01:51:25.080]  call you and find out what i need to do next what i did
[01:51:25.080 --> 01:51:27.960]  properly and proper was anything i could have
[01:51:27.960 --> 01:51:31.000]  did and have it dismissed at that point but like you said
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:34.760]  i have to put this stuff in writing first and presented again but that what
[01:51:34.760 --> 01:51:36.680]  you gave me was definitely not going to be enough
[01:51:36.680 --> 01:51:40.040]  and i thought it would have been so that would have been a poor assumption on my
[01:51:40.040 --> 01:51:44.200]  part yes it would okay yeah okay well that's why i
[01:51:44.200 --> 01:51:47.160]  keep calling and trying to get things together and then that's why i was
[01:51:47.160 --> 01:51:50.120]  going to find out if what i needed was going to be in that similar
[01:51:50.120 --> 01:51:53.720]  package but that is not what you tell me it might be the forms
[01:51:53.720 --> 01:51:57.960]  but it's not going to be what i need to build this build this case up
[01:51:57.960 --> 01:52:02.280]  it sounds like you need to be in in touch with Olivier
[01:52:02.280 --> 01:52:06.280]  and work on that i haven't heard out of Olivier in a while i don't even know if
[01:52:06.280 --> 01:52:09.960]  you're still after listening but if he is i wish he'd call in and let us know
[01:52:09.960 --> 01:52:13.960]  how he's been doing because he was fighting tooth and nail and he
[01:52:13.960 --> 01:52:17.240]  was learning a lot and he was picking it up well he was really
[01:52:17.240 --> 01:52:21.400]  learning how to apply this stuff and make it stick
[01:52:21.400 --> 01:52:28.440]  and he would be a good one to work with you to show you how he did it yeah i i
[01:52:28.440 --> 01:52:31.560]  knew you mentioned him before but he never i think i had a number he
[01:52:31.560 --> 01:52:35.240]  never called me or whatever and then there was another guy named
[01:52:35.240 --> 01:52:40.360]  Emmett and he was a necktie and uh he was supposed to have been
[01:52:40.360 --> 01:52:43.640]  helping me out but he was a real necktie so i couldn't deal with him because he
[01:52:43.640 --> 01:52:47.320]  was hearing stuff coming off all crazy so i left that alone but
[01:52:47.320 --> 01:52:50.760]  i knew you mentioned somebody it was Olivier who you talked about before
[01:52:50.760 --> 01:52:54.840]  and i've heard him talk on your show a few times and he danced on his act
[01:52:54.840 --> 01:52:57.800]  together but no i never had a chance for him to
[01:52:57.800 --> 01:53:01.240]  reach back to me on that and that's why i said it got
[01:53:01.240 --> 01:53:03.720]  frustrated because if you don't know the stuff where to go
[01:53:03.720 --> 01:53:07.800]  you gotta get frustrated very easily well that's that's why this is something
[01:53:07.800 --> 01:53:10.760]  you can't learn in a day this is why something
[01:53:10.760 --> 01:53:15.080]  you can't put something together on a whim if you're going to learn to do it
[01:53:15.080 --> 01:53:19.720]  right it takes time it takes effort and it takes real dedication to getting the
[01:53:19.720 --> 01:53:22.680]  information it's not going to come easy it's not
[01:53:22.680 --> 01:53:27.000]  going to come fast and if it did you wouldn't remember it
[01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:30.920]  worth a damn the work is what makes it stick
[01:53:30.920 --> 01:53:34.440]  that's true that's very true and like i said i might i'm getting a little bit
[01:53:34.440 --> 01:53:37.960]  better on the memory side of things that i was there but i just want to call you
[01:53:37.960 --> 01:53:41.480]  back and find out and make sure i go in and get that
[01:53:41.480 --> 01:53:46.200]  information on your seminar and then just talk to you about what i did and
[01:53:46.200 --> 01:53:50.360]  what do i what would wrong possibly what should i could have been here for me
[01:53:50.360 --> 01:53:54.520]  and then i wouldn't copy it off this um i can tell you on the phone but i'm
[01:53:54.520 --> 01:53:58.520]  assuming it says registration statement
[01:53:58.520 --> 01:54:05.000]  uh pursuant to the foreign agent registration yeah i know what it is
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:08.520]  guess what you need to do with that
[01:54:09.160 --> 01:54:15.000]  you know about this oh i know about it guess what you need to do with it
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:20.120]  how well stocked are you on toilet paper at home
[01:54:20.760 --> 01:54:27.240]  yeah i'm not well there there's you a likely saver right there
[01:54:28.840 --> 01:54:33.560]  so you you saying by using this would be better no
[01:54:33.560 --> 01:54:38.040]  for wiping your butt maybe but not for filing in the court
[01:54:38.040 --> 01:54:43.640]  uh oh not in the court oh damn okay because i don't want to
[01:54:43.640 --> 01:54:47.000]  uh yeah because some guy was on the youtube is how i got this
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:50.040]  talking about the morris and he was showing people that used this
[01:54:50.040 --> 01:54:55.960]  and she had to say cases to smith okay
[01:54:55.960 --> 01:54:59.960]  don't do it all right no don't do it and let me let me explain something about
[01:54:59.960 --> 01:55:02.760]  these so-called cases on youtube that you're seeing
[01:55:02.760 --> 01:55:07.400]  youtube rule number one they draw equivocations
[01:55:07.400 --> 01:55:11.240]  i did a the court did b therefore i was right with a
[01:55:11.240 --> 01:55:17.880]  that is not necessarily true okay okay okay same thing goes with all the other
[01:55:17.880 --> 01:55:21.240]  stuff that's floating around out there well i did a i waited three weeks the
[01:55:21.240 --> 01:55:26.440]  court did nothing therefore i won uh no you didn't
[01:55:26.440 --> 01:55:31.000]  okay there's all kinds of reasons why you may have got off with this one
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:34.440]  but it ain't necessarily because of something you filed
[01:55:34.440 --> 01:55:38.520]  the only way to know for sure that what you did was the right thing to do
[01:55:38.520 --> 01:55:41.640]  and that it was successful the way you intended
[01:55:41.640 --> 01:55:47.160]  was to get a signed a dismissal order or to get a verdict in your favor
[01:55:47.160 --> 01:55:53.640]  okay so when they say they won their case the first question i ask is
[01:55:53.640 --> 01:55:58.120]  where is the signed order either dismissing the case
[01:55:58.120 --> 01:56:04.280]  or giving you the verdict where is it okay and i saw that i saw that on that
[01:56:04.280 --> 01:56:09.720]  youtube video no no wait a minute wait okay what did the signed order say the
[01:56:09.720 --> 01:56:15.560]  basis of the case was as far as the way it was settled
[01:56:15.560 --> 01:56:21.960]  gotcha all i saw was show dismissed right but as far as you know unless you
[01:56:21.960 --> 01:56:27.240]  matched up the case numbers on the order with the actual case number
[01:56:27.240 --> 01:56:31.400]  that you were watching the video about you don't know if that order applied to
[01:56:31.400 --> 01:56:36.040]  that case or not do you no and that's a good point
[01:56:36.040 --> 01:56:40.040]  it's a good point okay so when somebody's telling you
[01:56:40.040 --> 01:56:43.800]  i filed this in my case and they don't give you the case number
[01:56:43.800 --> 01:56:47.080]  and then they say here's the signed order from my case
[01:56:47.080 --> 01:56:50.120]  you don't know that that's true because you've got nothing to compare the order
[01:56:50.120 --> 01:56:55.080]  to i don't see a lot of that on on on that
[01:56:55.080 --> 01:56:59.080]  right you do people that claim to have all the
[01:56:59.080 --> 01:57:02.280]  answers but cannot even give you a complete picture
[01:57:02.280 --> 01:57:07.640]  of how they got that so-called answer they're not telling you the truth
[01:57:07.640 --> 01:57:10.520]  yeah that's 98 percent of the time because that's the one thing i keep
[01:57:10.520 --> 01:57:13.240]  complaining about everybody come with all these so-called remedies but there's no
[01:57:13.240 --> 01:57:15.720]  case numbers there's no number you could call them
[01:57:15.720 --> 01:57:18.600]  back you know if you try to call the dog on website
[01:57:18.600 --> 01:57:22.600]  you don't get through and something you know this is a bunch of bogus crap so
[01:57:22.600 --> 01:57:28.440]  that's what i feel it bingo yeah here's the thing
[01:57:28.440 --> 01:57:33.080]  if you can't verify it as far as the law is concerned
[01:57:33.080 --> 01:57:37.480]  it doesn't exist it doesn't exist
[01:57:37.480 --> 01:57:40.760]  all right so you know if i show you that one one thing i know you already know
[01:57:40.760 --> 01:57:44.040]  about this thing because i wouldn't copy it off the day
[01:57:44.040 --> 01:57:47.640]  and the next thing for me to do is yeah believe me i have seen
[01:57:47.640 --> 01:57:51.640]  every gimmick method solution there is to be had
[01:57:51.640 --> 01:57:55.400]  in the years i've been doing this i have researched every single thing these
[01:57:55.400 --> 01:57:58.840]  people have tried to throw out there to say how this is done
[01:57:58.840 --> 01:58:03.080]  and not one of them has ever been able to provide something that fully supports
[01:58:03.080 --> 01:58:05.480]  what they're talking about just doesn't do it
[01:58:05.480 --> 01:58:11.240]  it's all based upon misconceptions bad comprehension skills about what they're
[01:58:11.240 --> 01:58:15.560]  reading taking stuff out of context misapplying it
[01:58:15.560 --> 01:58:18.920]  they're taking one part of the law mixing it with another part of the law
[01:58:18.920 --> 01:58:22.680]  and some concept of their own and saying that is the law and that is not the way
[01:58:22.680 --> 01:58:26.360]  it works you have to do the bible and scriptures
[01:58:26.360 --> 01:58:30.360]  okay so you may as well be sitting down trying to write your own bible and
[01:58:30.360 --> 01:58:33.400]  create your own religion the way they're doing it
[01:58:33.400 --> 01:58:37.240]  exactly well that was what i was gonna come back to you with today
[01:58:37.240 --> 01:58:41.320]  because i sure saw that and i and so my thing was
[01:58:41.320 --> 01:58:45.320]  this is always confirmed back with you all right libya man i'm all i'm sorry
[01:58:45.320 --> 01:58:50.280]  charles i'm out of here man folks y'all have a great week good night god bless
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:53.800]  bibles for america is offering absolutely free
[01:58:53.800 --> 01:58:57.800]  a unique study bible called the new testament recovery version
[01:58:57.800 --> 01:59:02.440]  the new testament recovery version has over 9 000 footnotes that explain what
[01:59:02.440 --> 01:59:06.520]  the bible says verse by verse helping you to know god
[01:59:06.520 --> 01:59:10.680]  and to know the meaning of life order your free copy today from bibles for
[01:59:10.680 --> 01:59:16.680]  america call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.680 --> 01:59:23.080]  or visit us online at bfa.org this translation is highly accurate and it
[01:59:23.080 --> 01:59:27.160]  comes with over 13 000 cross references plus charts and
[01:59:27.160 --> 01:59:30.200]  maps and an outline for every book of the bible
[01:59:30.200 --> 01:59:34.520]  this is truly a bible you can understand to get your free copy of the new
[01:59:34.520 --> 01:59:41.080]  testament recovery version call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:41.080 --> 01:59:51.320]  that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:59:51.320 --> 02:00:11.960]  looking for some truth you found it logosradionetwork.com