ROL_2019-02-18_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.780]  The Falling News Flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdowns, providing the jelly
[00:05.780 --> 00:13.420]  bulletins for the Commodity Market, Today's History, News Updates, and the Inside Scoop
[00:13.420 --> 00:21.300]  into the Tides of the Alternative.
[00:21.300 --> 00:29.180]  Markets for Wazeva 6th of February 2019, open with gold at $1,313.70 and silver $15.77
[00:29.180 --> 00:36.760]  amounts, copper $2.83 amounts, oil Texas Crude $3.66 of barrel, Brent Crude $61.98
[00:36.760 --> 00:43.440]  of barrel, and cryptos in order of market capitalization, Bitcoin $3,401.64, Ripple
[00:43.440 --> 00:52.240]  XRP $0.29, Ethereum $103.10, and Eos is at $2.32 of crypto coin.
[00:52.240 --> 00:59.640]  Today's History, the year 1918, British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property
[00:59.640 --> 01:04.580]  qualifications get the right to vote when the Representation of the People Act of 1918
[01:04.580 --> 01:05.900]  was passed by Parliament.
[01:05.900 --> 01:13.660]  Today's History, in recent news, several Texas-based organizations filed a lawsuit today requesting
[01:13.660 --> 01:18.500]  that a federal court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally
[01:18.500 --> 01:19.860]  registered to vote.
[01:19.860 --> 01:24.660]  The list was compiled after an 11-month-long investigation by the Office of the Texas Secretary
[01:24.660 --> 01:29.500]  of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety, which sought to identify non-U.S.
[01:29.500 --> 01:33.380]  citizens who were registered to vote when obtaining a job as license.
[01:33.380 --> 01:37.060]  Over half of the 95,000 didn't indeed vote, it seems.
[01:37.060 --> 01:41.100]  However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were
[01:41.100 --> 01:45.300]  not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:45.300 --> 01:50.900]  Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:50.900 --> 01:55.260]  Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond
[01:55.260 --> 01:57.100]  with proof of eligibility.
[01:57.100 --> 02:01.260]  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have
[02:01.260 --> 02:09.020]  yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[02:09.020 --> 02:14.420]  A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck after
[02:14.420 --> 02:16.940]  a vape pen exploded while he was using it.
[02:16.940 --> 02:20.660]  It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[02:20.660 --> 02:24.260]  An x-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem.
[02:24.260 --> 02:30.460]  The vape store, Smoke and Vape DZ, has refused to comment.
[02:30.460 --> 02:35.220]  First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz, interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of
[02:35.220 --> 02:40.180]  Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
[02:40.180 --> 02:45.220]  conference which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February 14th
[02:45.220 --> 02:47.460]  to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[02:47.460 --> 02:56.220]  You can find the interview at kiitv.com This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February
[02:56.220 --> 03:14.180]  14th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[03:14.180 --> 03:41.780]  Good evening folks, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie
[03:41.780 --> 03:42.780]  Craig.
[03:42.780 --> 03:48.220]  On February 18th, 2019, we are live tonight.
[03:48.220 --> 03:49.220]  We are not Memorex.
[03:49.220 --> 03:53.980]  I don't have a whole lot to talk about at the beginning of the show, just some reminders
[03:53.980 --> 03:57.620]  of the things that we've talked about in the past.
[03:57.620 --> 04:05.900]  Attorneys lie, politicians lie, those who are judges lie, those who tell you that they
[04:05.900 --> 04:12.620]  know how to live your life better than you do lie, those who think they control what
[04:12.620 --> 04:20.660]  the people can and cannot do when it harms no one else are all liars.
[04:20.660 --> 04:25.700]  They're all people that want control over things that we the people never gave them
[04:25.700 --> 04:30.180]  any authority to control in the first place.
[04:30.180 --> 04:38.440]  At some point, my eternal hope is that you realize that.
[04:38.440 --> 04:45.620]  The second half of that eternal hope is that you finally decide to actually do something
[04:45.620 --> 04:46.620]  about it.
[04:46.620 --> 04:54.020]  Now don't get me wrong, what we can do about it versus what we're told we can do about
[04:54.020 --> 04:58.940]  it are two very different things.
[04:58.940 --> 05:03.980]  My hope has always been that we could do it without resorting to all of the means left
[05:03.980 --> 05:08.660]  to the people to do what needs to be done to reclaim what is rightfully ours is to take
[05:08.660 --> 05:13.740]  control of our country from those who have seized it unlawfully for their own private
[05:13.740 --> 05:20.420]  profit and gain and put protections into place to prevent it from happening again, which
[05:20.420 --> 05:31.900]  is the entire reason the Constitution was designed with the fluidity of form and content
[05:31.900 --> 05:39.020]  that it was so that we can amend it and we can change it or we can abolish it and start
[05:39.020 --> 05:46.900]  over if we so choose any time we the people decide it is needed.
[05:46.900 --> 05:54.260]  Now by all the griping and grumbling and everything else that's going on in the world that we
[05:54.260 --> 06:03.740]  consider to be the U.S. of A, I'm fairly certain the people have had enough.
[06:03.740 --> 06:12.940]  My question however remains why aren't you willing to do something about it?
[06:12.940 --> 06:18.820]  Every time we turn around we're complaining, we're griping, we're grumbling, we're moaning
[06:18.820 --> 06:25.860]  about how things are and who's responsible, but just like in virtually every other instance
[06:25.860 --> 06:33.180]  in life when a real problem raises its head, we're pointing fingers in the wrong direction.
[06:33.180 --> 06:41.820]  Most certainly is that the case in this because when it comes to the power of government and
[06:41.820 --> 06:49.220]  what it can and cannot rightfully do, the buck stops with you and me, not with them.
[06:49.220 --> 06:52.780]  It stops with you and me.
[06:52.780 --> 06:57.100]  What are the things we said they could do?
[06:57.100 --> 07:02.380]  What are the things that they cannot do because we limited what they could do?
[07:02.380 --> 07:11.780]  And why do we take no action when any one or more of them decide to violate what we said?
[07:11.780 --> 07:21.180]  No government official, judge or anyone else that is unelected, unappointed and not, doesn't
[07:21.180 --> 07:27.980]  matter whether they're elected or not, when they choose to read something into our rules
[07:27.980 --> 07:35.140]  for them that isn't there or to take away some limitation that is inherently there or
[07:35.140 --> 07:46.420]  explicitly there, those are the people that we should be jumping on hand, foot and hammer,
[07:46.420 --> 07:51.380]  the instant they try to do it.
[07:51.380 --> 07:55.300]  See this is the thing I keep saying about the constitutions of the various states as
[07:55.300 --> 08:00.300]  well as the federal constitution itself being written without the means for the people to
[08:00.300 --> 08:06.460]  actually control the government officials without resorting to another revolution to
[08:06.460 --> 08:11.420]  do it.
[08:11.420 --> 08:17.260]  Everything in those constitutions, state and federal, should require oversight of the people
[08:17.260 --> 08:25.140]  and place explicitly placed power directly in the hands of public tribunals that are
[08:25.140 --> 08:31.580]  not of the official nature as those created by government so that they maintain the status
[08:31.580 --> 08:43.500]  quo for the government but instead tribunals formulated, populated and presided over by
[08:43.500 --> 08:50.180]  we the people outside of any power delegated to government with the express instructions
[08:50.180 --> 08:56.180]  that no power delegated to government will ever be superior to the inherent individual
[08:56.180 --> 09:03.100]  rights of the people except in very specific delineated instances which is what the purpose
[09:03.100 --> 09:09.860]  of government was originally designed to be, the one and only purpose to protect those
[09:09.860 --> 09:17.100]  individual rights and so government's power would be fully and explicitly limited to
[09:17.100 --> 09:25.660]  action against the people only where those people have violated the rights property or
[09:25.660 --> 09:33.580]  person of another and nowhere else, nowhere else should government be allowed to create
[09:33.580 --> 09:42.220]  any law doing anything to or in relation to the people.
[09:42.220 --> 09:50.220]  If the law enacted is not related to the protection of an individual right or a recourse for remedy
[09:50.220 --> 09:56.700]  when any individual right has been infringed upon no matter who infringes whether it is
[09:56.700 --> 10:05.580]  government or private until that is actually written and we hold them to it by force of
[10:05.580 --> 10:11.700]  arms via the second amendment that we were was left in place specifically to ensure that
[10:11.700 --> 10:17.180]  there could be no misunderstanding about that and yet how many times have they tried to
[10:17.180 --> 10:23.780]  intentionally misunderstand it and how many times have those people that have intentionally
[10:23.780 --> 10:30.220]  misunderstood it gotten reelected to office instead of being completely disqualified from
[10:30.220 --> 10:37.140]  holding the office from that moment forward or ever again and being charged with a crime
[10:37.140 --> 10:42.620]  for attempting to subvert our form of government.
[10:42.620 --> 10:50.980]  When was the last time we the people sat down and agreed to work together to prevent and
[10:50.980 --> 10:53.580]  to deal with those things?
[10:53.580 --> 11:02.980]  Well I'll tell you the constitutional convention that was the last time and as far as I know
[11:02.980 --> 11:11.140]  the only time that we the people got together and decided we would send people that we respected
[11:11.140 --> 11:18.380]  for their determination to serve the individual over the collective and the power of government
[11:18.380 --> 11:25.340]  being subservient to those individuals rather than just the collective.
[11:25.340 --> 11:32.820]  That was the last time we made that decision and took that action and did something about
[11:32.820 --> 11:34.460]  the problems we were facing.
[11:34.460 --> 11:42.020]  Now granted the people as a whole didn't authorize that okay nobody asked the majority
[11:42.020 --> 11:47.100]  of the people that were here whether or not that was something they could do and further
[11:47.100 --> 11:52.900]  more nobody here appointed those that went to the constitutional convention with the
[11:52.900 --> 12:01.860]  power to actually do what they did and the article is a confederation for that perspective
[12:01.860 --> 12:08.660]  if you actually read them to dissolve the articles of confederation took a unanimous
[12:08.660 --> 12:17.700]  vote of the colonies okay a unanimous vote there could be no dissent or they could not
[12:17.700 --> 12:22.980]  dissolve the articles of confederation.
[12:22.980 --> 12:30.500]  How then did the constitutional convention manage to do that thing that the articles
[12:30.500 --> 12:40.500]  of confederation said could not be done without unanimous consent well they decided that piece
[12:40.500 --> 12:48.460]  meal consent was good enough again not something we could have given them any power to do because
[12:48.460 --> 12:54.420]  we couldn't outweigh the articles confederation the way they were but somehow or other they
[12:54.420 --> 12:59.900]  shrugged off all their duties under those things and did what they did I can't say I
[12:59.900 --> 13:06.660]  disagree with what they did to the purpose of why they did it and what was intended by
[13:06.660 --> 13:14.520]  their doing it but I can say that if the rules are written down then they ought to be followed
[13:14.520 --> 13:22.220]  if they were written down and agreed to by everyone ahead of time there were no surprises
[13:22.220 --> 13:27.820]  there were none of those things everybody knew what they were getting into and they agreed
[13:27.820 --> 13:33.620]  to it and as long as they didn't give any particular advantage to anyone in there and
[13:33.620 --> 13:39.620]  special privileges and all that stuff I don't see what the problem with it was and nowhere
[13:39.620 --> 13:47.180]  does the constitution that we have do that any special privileges granted to themselves
[13:47.180 --> 13:53.900]  our government officials have done under the table and through their own rulings about
[13:53.900 --> 13:59.700]  what they can and cannot do and they are not based upon the constitution and any argument
[13:59.700 --> 14:05.580]  to the contrary is a ball face lie because all you have to do is read the constitution
[14:05.580 --> 14:11.100]  understand its intention to formulate government to protect individual rights and immediately
[14:11.100 --> 14:17.620]  it is revealed that the basis they are standing on the foundation of their entire argument
[14:17.620 --> 14:32.420]  is a lie a self serving lie and yet here we sit day in day out watching this happen and
[14:32.420 --> 14:38.900]  doing nothing despite all the precautions that were taken to ensure that when this type
[14:38.900 --> 14:47.420]  of thing reared its ugly head we had the power and the means to do something about it right
[14:47.420 --> 14:57.580]  then right there and we did not have to resort to government about government but here we
[14:57.580 --> 15:06.700]  are still waiting for the quote unquote right way to do things I said it before I will say
[15:06.700 --> 15:14.660]  it again this is not a system that can be fixed this is not a system that you can alter
[15:14.660 --> 15:24.660]  or reform from the end side cannot be done okay you are vastly outnumbered you are vastly
[15:24.660 --> 15:31.580]  out overpowered and outmaneuvered because there are many many many against you that
[15:31.580 --> 15:38.780]  like the status quo the way it is that have more power in that system than you do and
[15:38.780 --> 15:44.220]  because the system has created its own form of checks and balances outside of those that
[15:44.220 --> 15:52.100]  we established for it the system has a way of purging itself of negativity in how it
[15:52.100 --> 15:58.580]  operates we see it with the so-called good cops that can't stay cops we see it with the
[15:58.580 --> 16:05.420]  so-called good attorneys that get disbarred and can't remain attorneys etc etc etc but
[16:05.420 --> 16:16.580]  if you really think that that's about preservation alone rather than control you're mistaken
[16:16.580 --> 16:23.420]  when you control every avenue of remedy and you get to decide what can be remedied and
[16:23.420 --> 16:30.420]  what cannot be remedied then you really have absolute power you have the power of a king
[16:30.420 --> 16:42.740]  over subjects because they only live at his will and they die at his will and that ladies
[16:42.740 --> 16:48.500]  and gentlemen is exactly where we find ourselves today with all these cops killing us in droves
[16:48.500 --> 16:54.220]  sending us off to fight wars that aren't ours to fight and killing off those who could resist
[16:54.220 --> 17:02.340]  them by any means necessary y'all hang on we'll be right back rule of law radio is
[17:02.340 --> 17:06.420]  proud to offer the rule of law traffic similar in today's america we live in us against them
[17:06.420 --> 17:09.940]  society if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have
[17:09.940 --> 17:14.060]  to stand and defend our own rights among those rights are the right to travel freely from
[17:14.060 --> 17:17.380]  place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the
[17:17.380 --> 17:21.540]  right to due process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[17:21.540 --> 17:25.860]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process former sheriff's deputy
[17:25.860 --> 17:29.780]  a craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching
[17:29.780 --> 17:33.620]  tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts
[17:33.620 --> 17:37.380]  to the rule of law you can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule
[17:37.380 --> 17:41.460]  of law radio dot com and ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy
[17:41.460 --> 17:45.380]  of a textbook of texas transportation code the law versus the lie video and audio of
[17:45.380 --> 17:49.980]  your original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents and further useful resource material
[17:49.980 --> 17:53.060]  learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material for rule of law radio
[17:53.060 --> 17:57.340]  dot com order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want
[17:57.340 --> 18:04.540]  to enter sir are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even
[18:04.540 --> 18:10.100]  lawsuits stop debt collectors now with the michael mirris proven method michael mirris
[18:10.100 --> 18:15.180]  has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two you'll
[18:15.180 --> 18:19.940]  get step-by-step instructions in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil
[18:19.940 --> 18:25.420]  rights statutes what to do when contacted by phone mail or court summons how to answer
[18:25.420 --> 18:30.020]  letters and phone calls how to get debt collectors out of your credit report how to turn the
[18:30.020 --> 18:35.740]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away the michael mirris proven method
[18:35.740 --> 18:41.380]  is the solution for how to stop debt collectors personal consultation is available as well
[18:41.380 --> 18:46.060]  for more information please visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the blue michael
[18:46.060 --> 18:52.180]  mirris banner or email michael mirris at yahoo dot com that's rule of law radio dot com
[18:52.180 --> 18:59.540]  or email m i c h a e l m i r r a s at yahoo dot com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.540 --> 19:00.540]  net
[19:00.540 --> 19:16.620]  you are listening to the logo radio network logo radio network dot com
[19:16.620 --> 19:42.080]  are
[19:42.080 --> 19:49.920]  number is 512-646-1984. Now, last thing on the note of what I was speaking of here,
[19:51.920 --> 19:58.640]  if we don't start thinking about where we are, not where we're headed, where we are,
[20:00.320 --> 20:06.400]  and we don't start working together in a way that means something,
[20:06.400 --> 20:14.000]  to regain control of our lives, our government, our property, everything,
[20:15.680 --> 20:22.160]  then you can kiss it all goodbye. This is all going to go to hell in the hand basket,
[20:22.160 --> 20:26.880]  and there is not going to be any stopping it if there is any way to stop it right now.
[20:27.840 --> 20:29.520]  I can't say for sure that there is.
[20:29.520 --> 20:38.400]  Now, with that said, I have spent the last week trying to rebuild computers,
[20:38.400 --> 20:41.120]  the ones that I've got that have been down for a couple years.
[20:42.400 --> 20:47.520]  Fortunately, I had enough spare parts cobbled between them to get a couple of them going again,
[20:49.040 --> 20:54.560]  but I'm still behind on them and still having problems with one that should work but doesn't
[20:54.560 --> 21:01.040]  want to work. In any case, what I'm trying to do with these is I am trying to set up
[21:01.040 --> 21:06.480]  a set of Linux servers to do online classes where I can actually host the class,
[21:07.440 --> 21:10.960]  do the video streaming and everything directly from where I am.
[21:12.640 --> 21:18.560]  So that I don't have to rely on some sort of censorship or anything like that from YouTube
[21:18.560 --> 21:24.640]  or any of that kind of stuff. I'm going to try to make this work as an interactive kind of class,
[21:25.360 --> 21:31.200]  and so you'll be able to log into it with a web browser after you go through PayPal, of course,
[21:31.200 --> 21:35.200]  because these are not going to be free. I've got to generate some money here somehow.
[21:35.200 --> 21:37.920]  Right now, Cedad Blaine broke. I can't even pay my phone bill,
[21:37.920 --> 21:41.280]  which any of you out there that's seeking my help and trying to call me,
[21:41.280 --> 21:43.920]  you're going to find out really quick, that just ain't going to work,
[21:43.920 --> 21:50.640]  because there hasn't been any money coming in from anywhere to do anything to keep us going,
[21:50.640 --> 21:57.440]  to keep me going, to keep this stuff running. So I have no choice, but the way lay everything
[21:57.440 --> 22:03.120]  else I'm trying to get done, the new seminar material, the cases I'm working on, I can't do
[22:03.120 --> 22:08.880]  anything because they're not generating money on a regular basis enough to keep me where I can even
[22:08.880 --> 22:15.520]  keep the bills paid. I'm done as much as I can on that and it's not getting me anywhere. So I'm
[22:15.520 --> 22:21.200]  going to try to set this up and start getting people to come into these classes and see if we
[22:21.200 --> 22:28.720]  can't raise something that way. And what I'm going to be teaching you is the actual statutory law,
[22:28.720 --> 22:34.240]  how to read it, how to understand it, what to do with it, how to think about it,
[22:34.240 --> 22:41.760]  how to write your legal briefs and other documents according to it, how to use case law correctly,
[22:41.760 --> 22:49.440]  how to research case law correctly, how to verify case law correctly for a change.
[22:50.160 --> 22:56.880]  No more patronut crap needs to be getting spread around out there, okay? That needs to stop.
[22:57.840 --> 23:02.320]  People are losing, they're setting bad precedent, they're setting bad examples,
[23:02.320 --> 23:07.280]  they're making it virtually impossible for someone who actually knows what the heck they're doing
[23:07.280 --> 23:13.120]  to go into a court and come out with a positive outcome because the judge doesn't want to hear
[23:13.120 --> 23:20.160]  anything because he thinks or she thinks they've already heard it all before because it was somewhat
[23:20.160 --> 23:30.880]  similar, okay? Enough of that. Now I will be posting both on my legal blog and on Facebook,
[23:30.880 --> 23:40.000]  when and if this happens and I'm able to get it up and running. There are some things I
[23:40.000 --> 23:45.920]  still need to make this work, but again, no money, no money, can't produce, can't produce,
[23:45.920 --> 23:52.480]  can't do this. And y'all go without the benefit of everything that I've been trying to educate you
[23:52.480 --> 23:58.800]  on for years just on the radio of actually having it put into practical application and teaching,
[23:58.800 --> 24:04.960]  okay? So if that is worth something to you, then you're going to want to sign up for the class.
[24:04.960 --> 24:08.320]  If you're going to want to learn how to do this right, you're going to want to sign up for the
[24:08.320 --> 24:15.120]  class, okay? But until I can get this class running, that's not going to happen either.
[24:15.920 --> 24:22.480]  So folks, if you haven't been donating, please consider doing it now because this is where we're
[24:22.480 --> 24:32.240]  at. I'm on the verge of having to just quit everything and just go out and go back to work
[24:32.240 --> 24:39.040]  doing other things and y'all can fend for yourselves because I can't live like this anymore. None of us
[24:39.040 --> 24:46.960]  can. If you're not out there for us, we cannot be here for you. We are not wealthy individuals.
[24:46.960 --> 24:53.600]  We don't have a private trust fund or anything else like that that we're sitting on that keeps
[24:53.600 --> 25:01.680]  us going. I live hand to mouth, nickel and dime every single day and have four years trying to
[25:01.680 --> 25:10.640]  get a handle on this stuff and teach you about it. So it would be nice if things were different for
[25:10.640 --> 25:17.200]  us but they're not and without you they're not going to be and we have to go do something else.
[25:17.760 --> 25:24.640]  So keep that in mind. Okay, all of that said, let's get started with the callers we have. Right now
[25:24.640 --> 25:30.160]  we're going to start with Larry in Arizona. Larry, what can we do for you? And you got about four
[25:30.160 --> 25:39.680]  minutes before I got to cut you off and take a break. Okay, Eddie. Eddie, what's the definitive?
[25:39.680 --> 25:49.040]  I don't know what called an argument for what is private property? I mean, if I argue with somebody
[25:49.040 --> 25:55.280]  that I have private property, I have absolute ownership, I have full dominion over it,
[25:55.280 --> 26:01.280]  but what's the correct argument? Well, that would depend according to the courts upon what kind of
[26:01.280 --> 26:06.000]  property you're talking about because they differentiate between the types of property
[26:06.000 --> 26:12.640]  that are private, personal and, you know, subject to protection under the Constitution and Bill of
[26:12.640 --> 26:25.440]  Rights. Land. Okay, so again, without having the actual alloidial title, which is your land patent,
[26:25.440 --> 26:34.240]  which is what the law itself says it is, you don't own it. A deed is not ownership. I did update my
[26:34.240 --> 26:40.720]  land patent. Okay, you have an actual land patent that says that the state or the federal government,
[26:40.720 --> 26:46.400]  which in your case, Arizona, it's fed, that the federal government completely relinquished all
[26:46.400 --> 26:54.160]  rights and claims to that land forever, to whoever got it at the time. Yes, they relinquished it
[26:54.160 --> 27:01.280]  for the state or to a private party. Yeah, it was granted to him with the word forever. Okay,
[27:01.280 --> 27:10.000]  the state, despite where its territorial boundaries lie, the state cannot lay claim to that which
[27:10.000 --> 27:16.000]  it never possessed in the first place. Despite how they want to think about it, just because it's
[27:16.000 --> 27:23.040]  within some border that was later defined after the fact, that does not void the contract because
[27:23.040 --> 27:31.600]  that would go directly against the constitutional limitation on government to interfere with contracts.
[27:31.600 --> 27:39.840]  Would it not? Oh, yes, it would. Okay. Okay, is a land patent a contract? Absolutely.
[27:44.480 --> 27:51.920]  Okay. Absolutely. So, the state cannot override the federal authority in granting the land because
[27:51.920 --> 27:58.480]  it was federal land, quote, unquote, in the first place, not state land because the state did not
[27:58.480 --> 28:07.280]  exist at the time of the relinquishment of the land, correct? Yes. Okay, the state cannot retroactively
[28:07.280 --> 28:14.480]  violate that federal contract. Okay, so, I mean, they have never had a nexus with the property, so
[28:14.480 --> 28:20.240]  they're just, they've never had an interest. If someone comes along and tries to build a fence
[28:20.240 --> 28:25.920]  around your property and everybody else's and claims that just because it's within their fence,
[28:25.920 --> 28:34.000]  they own it, that doesn't mean they own it, does it? Sure doesn't. Their claim is invalid.
[28:34.720 --> 28:38.000]  So, what would give the state the power to make the same claim?
[28:42.000 --> 28:48.560]  Okay, I just get confused at times arguing with the assessors and things that they just,
[28:48.560 --> 28:55.360]  you know, they just keep throwing lies at you about, you know, they don't argue with the assessor.
[28:55.360 --> 29:02.400]  The assessor is an idiot. The assessor has never read the law in its totality. They don't understand
[29:02.400 --> 29:08.880]  every nuance of the property code. And when the property code is being written with terminology
[29:08.880 --> 29:15.520]  and sentence structure to give it the appearance of covering things that it doesn't, when in reality,
[29:15.520 --> 29:19.280]  it absolutely cannot cover the things they're trying to apply it to,
[29:20.720 --> 29:27.120]  then we have an issue. We have an issue of the state under color of law trying to violate
[29:27.120 --> 29:32.240]  a constitutional protection against interfering with the obligation of contracts.
[29:35.360 --> 29:38.240]  Okay, that's the answer I was looking for. Okay.
[29:39.840 --> 29:42.240]  All right, well, if it's helpful, give it a shot.
[29:42.240 --> 29:46.400]  Okay, I will. Thank you, Eddie. I appreciate it. Yes, sir. You have a good one.
[29:46.960 --> 29:51.600]  All right, folks, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. So, y'all hang on.
[30:02.240 --> 30:07.440]  Have you had your hug today? If not, you're missing out on some of the best medicine relationships
[30:07.440 --> 30:12.400]  have to offer. Dr. Catherine Olbrecht, tell me back in just a moment to tell you why you should
[30:12.400 --> 30:19.040]  get your daily dose of hug power. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[30:19.040 --> 30:24.080]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will
[30:24.080 --> 30:29.920]  start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to
[30:29.920 --> 30:35.200]  yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you
[30:35.200 --> 30:41.840]  by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bin. Start over
[30:41.840 --> 30:48.320]  with StartPage. A hug a day could keep the heart doctor away. Researchers at the University of
[30:48.320 --> 30:53.760]  North Carolina say a simple embrace has benefits that go way beyond that warm and fuzzy feeling.
[30:53.760 --> 30:58.480]  They measure the levels of the stress hormone cortisol and the bonding hormone oxytocin,
[30:58.480 --> 31:04.320]  both before and after volunteer couples held hands, talked, and hugged. Following the 20-second hug,
[31:04.320 --> 31:10.240]  oxytocin increased and cortisol decreased in both men and women. As a result, their blood pressure
[31:10.240 --> 31:15.600]  also went down, lowering their risk of cardiovascular disease. So wrap your arms around the one you
[31:15.600 --> 31:20.880]  love. It'll do your heart and theirs a world of good. I'm Dr. Catherine Olbrecht, sending you a
[31:20.880 --> 31:25.520]  virtual hug from Radioland. More news and information at CatherineOlbrecht.com.
[31:25.520 --> 31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government
[31:36.000 --> 31:41.440]  says the fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a
[31:41.440 --> 31:45.520]  controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and
[31:45.520 --> 31:50.160]  thousands of my fellow force responders have died. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural
[31:50.160 --> 31:54.320]  engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his
[31:54.320 --> 32:00.320]  son. We are Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:00.320 --> 32:03.520]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive
[32:03.520 --> 32:07.520]  hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the government caused it
[32:07.520 --> 32:11.440]  with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding
[32:11.440 --> 32:15.360]  about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why you have insurance,
[32:15.360 --> 32:19.840]  and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket
[32:19.840 --> 32:24.720]  expense. And we accept Bitcoin. As a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau
[32:24.720 --> 32:29.680]  with zero complaints, you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your
[32:29.680 --> 32:37.840]  roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:37.840 --> 32:42.800]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio
[32:42.800 --> 32:47.600]  Network to help continue this programming. So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking,
[32:47.600 --> 32:56.480]  your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts
[32:56.480 --> 33:22.480]  are based on full roof replacement. I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[33:26.480 --> 33:43.920]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[33:44.720 --> 33:50.480]  Just called, getting line, and let's talk. Now we have Adam in Texas. Adam, what can we do for you?
[33:50.480 --> 33:58.080]  Hey, Eddie, how are you doing? I'm doing all right so far anyway. Well, hey man, I don't have
[33:58.800 --> 34:07.440]  any specific personal question on any kind of personal endeavor I'm going through right now.
[34:07.440 --> 34:14.080]  What I wanted to call a talk about is commissioner's courts and county judges and the relationship
[34:14.080 --> 34:22.960]  between the two and the imposition of tax hikes and the adoptions of the tax rates for the fiscal
[34:22.960 --> 34:35.360]  years. Would that be all right? Sure. Well, what exactly is the relationship between the county
[34:35.360 --> 34:40.320]  judge and the four commissioners and who is ultimately responsible for the actions of the
[34:40.320 --> 34:45.280]  county commissioners? I mean, of course, they're responsible for what they do, but
[34:46.080 --> 34:49.680]  couldn't you call them? The county commissioners are responsible to the people of the county.
[34:49.680 --> 34:54.960]  They don't have anybody above them as far as anybody they have to actually report to.
[34:56.880 --> 35:01.040]  The county judge depends upon which county judge you're talking about.
[35:02.880 --> 35:07.440]  When you say county judge, are you talking the constitutional county judge? Are you talking
[35:07.440 --> 35:12.960]  a justice of the peace or are you talking about an actual county court at law judge?
[35:13.920 --> 35:20.400]  I'm talking about the constitutional county judge that sits with the county commissioners
[35:20.400 --> 35:27.360]  during their meetings and is actually voting. He's a fifth vote. Okay, they're the timebreaker vote.
[35:27.360 --> 35:38.560]  Yeah, great. Yeah. Okay, so as far as the relationship goes, the constitutional judge
[35:38.560 --> 35:48.080]  in Texas was originally there in place of all the JPs. Originally speaking, the constitutional
[35:48.080 --> 35:55.280]  county judge was the most important judge in the entire state for their county.
[35:55.280 --> 36:03.600]  They could handle any kind of case. That all got changed, if you'll guess when, right after
[36:04.720 --> 36:19.360]  which war? I'd say World War II. No, the Civil War. Okay. Okay. After that, when they started
[36:19.360 --> 36:25.920]  basically making the southern states into military dictatorship for a while under
[36:25.920 --> 36:33.600]  the northern states, the military dictatorship side established a lot of these divisions of power
[36:34.800 --> 36:40.240]  and rewrote the constitutions to put them in place so that they could do it the way they
[36:40.240 --> 36:48.400]  were doing it and oversee it. See the last valid constitution that the people of Texas
[36:48.400 --> 36:56.160]  put into place predates the Civil War. The one that came immediately upon the heels of the Civil
[36:56.160 --> 37:03.520]  War was put into place by the North, not by us. It was put in place by the people they put in power
[37:03.520 --> 37:13.200]  over Texas to redo everything and make what's called the Reformation Constitution and form of
[37:13.200 --> 37:23.280]  government. Okay. Okay. So that's when things went south in that regard. Not in a punning sense,
[37:23.280 --> 37:30.720]  but in a literal sense of the disparaging way it can be used when it's set. I'll believe it.
[37:30.720 --> 37:38.720]  I'll believe it. Okay. So when county commissioners get together and they're going to set the tax
[37:38.720 --> 37:48.000]  rates for, you know, the county as the taxing authority, the way I read it is first of all,
[37:48.000 --> 37:52.400]  if you're going to... What are you reading when you say the way I read it? What are you reading?
[37:53.280 --> 37:59.440]  I'm reading chapter 26 of the Texas Tax Code and the Texas Open Meetings Act.
[38:00.480 --> 38:07.520]  Okay. Did you read the government code, local government code that gives the county commissioners
[38:07.520 --> 38:12.560]  their power and authority and what it says they can and cannot do? That would be chapter 81,
[38:12.560 --> 38:19.360]  government code, correct? That's government code. Local government code also contains
[38:19.360 --> 38:25.200]  provisions for the counties and the municipalities. Right. So it's government code
[38:25.200 --> 38:33.200]  chapter 81 and the local government code in reference would be... I can't think of it on top
[38:33.200 --> 38:40.080]  of my head. You know, I'll find it. Yeah, no, I've read it too. So yeah, that's what I'm reading
[38:40.080 --> 38:47.920]  when I say the way I read it. I'm talking about the statute, not necessarily the Texas Constitution.
[38:49.920 --> 38:56.640]  So the way I read it is if the commissioner's court is going to impose a new tax, like they're
[38:56.640 --> 39:02.320]  going to, you know, set the tax rate and they're going to adopt a new tax, like say a special
[39:02.320 --> 39:09.680]  road and bridge tax or they're going to raise the taxes, the way I read it according to the
[39:09.680 --> 39:16.720]  Texas Open Meetings Act, number one, they have to provide proper public notice beforehand.
[39:17.280 --> 39:21.200]  Yeah, they get to determine what constitutes proper public notice,
[39:21.200 --> 39:24.720]  unless it's specifically written into the statute, what that entails.
[39:24.720 --> 39:30.800]  Well, the statute says they've got a 72 hours, you know, they have to
[39:31.360 --> 39:34.640]  post proper public notice. It has to be one half of a half of a half.
[39:34.640 --> 39:42.000]  Yeah, but does the statute say what constitutes proper public notice? Does it say what form
[39:42.000 --> 39:47.280]  or manner it must take to be considered proper public notice?
[39:48.080 --> 39:52.560]  Yeah, it's got to be in a newspaper and it's got to be no bigger than a
[39:52.560 --> 39:58.560]  half of a half of a page. It's got to be gigantic. It's got to be a gigantic newspaper.
[39:58.560 --> 40:01.680]  You said no bigger. Do you mean no smaller?
[40:02.320 --> 40:10.240]  No, yes, I mean no less. I'm sorry, no less. I don't remember the exact inches, but basically
[40:10.240 --> 40:16.720]  it's a quarter of a whole newspaper page and has to be done within prior to 72 hours before the
[40:16.720 --> 40:26.640]  budget hearing, which they like to call a budget workshop now. But so, yeah, you following me?
[40:26.640 --> 40:27.120]  Yeah.
[40:28.560 --> 40:36.240]  Okay. So, and then also I read, you know, in the tax code, I believe it's chapter 26,
[40:36.240 --> 40:42.400]  if they're going to impose a tax hiker or adopt the new tax, like a special road bridge tax,
[40:42.400 --> 40:49.600]  because the constitution only provides for four specific taxes. You know, there's the
[40:49.600 --> 40:56.160]  general fund, the operations maintenance, the INS, and then the jury fund. And then the only
[40:56.160 --> 41:02.480]  other one, according to the Secretary of State and other people like that is a special road
[41:02.480 --> 41:10.480]  and bridge can be imposed no more than $0.15 per hundred dollars of a tax valuation.
[41:10.480 --> 41:19.360]  When the question becomes on who can those taxes be imposed? See, that's the other aspect of what
[41:19.360 --> 41:27.760]  you're thinking about here that I'm not hearing you address is to exactly who or what such taxation
[41:27.760 --> 41:34.960]  can really constitutionally and lawfully apply. I understand exactly what you're saying, Eddie,
[41:34.960 --> 41:42.000]  but I guess for the purposes of this conversation, I don't really want to go down that road quite
[41:42.000 --> 41:50.480]  yet because I think I already have them on the preliminary issues and not, you know, basically
[41:50.480 --> 41:58.720]  they impose, they raise the taxes and impose the new tax and they didn't do it according to the law.
[41:58.720 --> 42:06.880]  They violated the law in the implementation of these new taxes and that's kind of what I really
[42:06.880 --> 42:11.920]  want to talk about. I understand. I mean, yeah, no, I mean... Okay, are you someone that believes
[42:11.920 --> 42:22.160]  they are being subjected to this tax? I'm not being subjected to it as an individual, no.
[42:22.160 --> 42:29.840]  Okay, here's the problem. The only ones who are going to be able to enforce the law relating to
[42:29.840 --> 42:36.240]  the ones they broke as far as filing suit and suing is someone that is harmed by the implementation
[42:36.240 --> 42:44.960]  of the tax. Who are they imposing this tax upon? Okay. So again, that's part of what I was asking
[42:44.960 --> 42:53.440]  you. Who has to pay the tax is very, very relevant from any argument you want to make. It's very,
[42:53.440 --> 43:02.880]  very relevant. I agree. Okay. Well, please, unite me on that on down that road. Okay. Well,
[43:03.440 --> 43:08.240]  you cannot take action on behalf of someone else for an injury they received unless that
[43:08.240 --> 43:19.680]  someone else is your dependent or your spouse. All right. You can't sue the party who created
[43:19.680 --> 43:27.200]  the injury against your neighbor unless you yourself can show that that same instance
[43:27.200 --> 43:34.560]  injured you as well. And then the only thing you can sue for is your particular part of the
[43:34.560 --> 43:43.520]  injury. Okay. You can't sue for your neighbors. So the same thing of having to pay this tax.
[43:44.720 --> 43:50.560]  Who is going to get hit with the burden of having to collect and pay this tax? They're
[43:50.560 --> 43:55.280]  the ones going to have to sue that it was not properly enacted. Hang on just a second and we'll
[43:55.280 --> 44:01.760]  pick this up. All right, folks, we'll be right back. Y'all hang in there. Are you the plaintiff
[44:01.760 --> 44:07.120]  or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[44:07.120 --> 44:13.600]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[44:13.600 --> 44:19.680]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a
[44:19.680 --> 44:25.680]  lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course
[44:25.680 --> 44:32.400]  and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[44:32.400 --> 44:37.920]  winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[44:37.920 --> 44:43.840]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our
[44:43.840 --> 44:51.920]  audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.920 --> 44:59.920]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:02.240 --> 45:06.080]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by
[45:06.080 --> 45:10.160]  delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[45:10.160 --> 45:14.640]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins
[45:14.640 --> 45:19.040]  and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions
[45:19.040 --> 45:23.760]  for investors. We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited
[45:23.760 --> 45:28.240]  metal stealers and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[45:28.240 --> 45:32.640]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and
[45:32.640 --> 45:37.440]  Pollen Burst. We also offer one-world way, Mountain House storeable foods, Berky Water
[45:37.440 --> 45:42.480]  products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. We broker metals IRA accounts and we
[45:42.480 --> 45:49.760]  also accept big coins as payment. Call us at 512-646-644-0. We're located at 7304 Burnett
[45:49.760 --> 45:54.960]  Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturdays
[45:54.960 --> 46:13.440]  10-2. Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[46:25.040 --> 46:36.560]  Hey, but I can see the fires, the light. Burn it into the night. There's too many ways, too
[46:36.560 --> 46:46.480]  many people speaking too many problems. I'm not meant to argue around. Mastering it is
[46:46.480 --> 46:48.480]  I know I am the future
[46:51.480 --> 46:54.480]  This is the world we've been in
[46:55.480 --> 46:58.480]  And these are the hands we give to
[46:59.480 --> 47:02.480]  Choose and let's start fighting
[47:02.480 --> 47:15.480]  To make it a place where there's feeling in
[47:16.480 --> 47:19.480]  Who's Superman? Where are you now?
[47:20.480 --> 47:23.480]  When everything's wrong somehow
[47:24.480 --> 47:27.480]  The men are still without power
[47:27.480 --> 47:31.480]  There's no death, there's no body out
[47:32.480 --> 47:35.480]  This is a place, this is a place
[47:36.480 --> 47:37.480]  For we are both people
[47:38.480 --> 47:44.480]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Who is Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984
[47:45.480 --> 47:47.480]  And we are still talking with Adam in Texas.
[47:48.480 --> 47:54.480]  Okay, so as to what I'm saying, you can't sue for someone else's injury.
[47:54.480 --> 48:08.480]  So in relation to this tax, the injury is going to be the need of time, money, expenses and resources to collect and pay a tax that was unconstitutionally created and then levied against whoever's having to pay it.
[48:09.480 --> 48:11.480]  They're the ones that are going to have to fight back against it.
[48:12.480 --> 48:14.480]  Let me clarify, Eddie, real quick.
[48:15.480 --> 48:21.480]  The property in question that is being affected by this unconstitutional tax is a trust.
[48:21.480 --> 48:26.480]  And I am a beneficiary of that trust, so does that make me
[48:28.480 --> 48:37.480]  I do not know enough about trust law to know whether or not the beneficiary can sue for a legal issue involving the trust.
[48:38.480 --> 48:48.480]  I would think that the person who has to manage the trust, the trustee, would be the one that would have to do that. I can't say for sure.
[48:48.480 --> 48:50.480]  Okay.
[48:51.480 --> 48:54.480]  I just don't know enough about trust law to answer that any better than that.
[48:55.480 --> 49:00.480]  Well, hey man, it's okay. You can't know everything, although you know a lot.
[49:01.480 --> 49:05.480]  The other question, where does the private attorney general suit come in?
[49:06.480 --> 49:13.480]  Because under my, the way I see it is the private attorney general suit, you don't necessarily have to be affected.
[49:14.480 --> 49:16.480]  You can go and sue on other people's behalf.
[49:16.480 --> 49:18.480]  No, that's not necessarily true.
[49:19.480 --> 49:27.480]  You have to show in the attorney general suit that if you had not intervened, then you too would have been culpable to the same harm as everyone else.
[49:28.480 --> 49:29.480]  Okay.
[49:30.480 --> 49:39.480]  It also goes to the fact about whether or not the government is actually doing something in relation to violation of people's rights and property.
[49:39.480 --> 49:48.480]  Like, and again, unlawfully taxing individuals and the people rather than legal entities.
[49:49.480 --> 49:55.480]  So again, I don't know enough about the private attorney general side of things to answer that 100% correctly either.
[49:56.480 --> 50:04.480]  But I do know you have to have some sort of vested interest in the remedy you're seeking for you to be able to act as one.
[50:05.480 --> 50:06.480]  Okay.
[50:06.480 --> 50:11.480]  Again, you better have the money to maintain it if you do.
[50:12.480 --> 50:30.480]  Because unless it's something that goes to such an extent that the government is willing to step in and take it off of your hands, so to speak, then you're going to bear the entire burden, financial and everything else, sustaining and prosecuting that suit.
[50:31.480 --> 50:32.480]  Yeah.
[50:32.480 --> 50:44.480]  Okay. So it would be a matter of finding someone who is individually affected by this unconstitutional tax implementation by the county commissioner's court.
[50:45.480 --> 50:54.480]  Now, there's a good chance that it could have been challenged in the 72-hour notice timeframe by virtually anyone.
[50:54.480 --> 51:10.480]  It could have been challenged, but if that timeframe came and went or they never complied with it in the first place, then the only thing that can happen now to resolve it is someone who's adversely affected by it to challenge it as being unconstitutional.
[51:11.480 --> 51:18.480]  Okay. Well, then I'll tell you for fact, they never complied with the 72-hour proper public notice in the first place.
[51:18.480 --> 51:28.480]  Okay. Well, now, based upon what your facts are versus what your evidence is, how do you intend to what would be proper evidence that they did not comply?
[51:29.480 --> 51:31.480]  That's my first question to you.
[51:32.480 --> 51:34.480]  What in your mind is proper evidence?
[51:35.480 --> 51:44.480]  Well, according to the Texas Open Meetings Act, proper public notice would have constituted notice in the newspaper of the...
[51:44.480 --> 51:47.480]  I'm asking what the law is about how it has to be done.
[51:48.480 --> 52:03.480]  I'm asking you, what do you have in your possession that would constitute or can you get in your possession that would constitute proper evidence that they did not comply with those statutory requirements?
[52:03.480 --> 52:20.480]  Well, I have a newspaper article published by the County Commissioners' Court saying to be proper public notice that sites statutes that do not apply in any mean shape or form to the county.
[52:21.480 --> 52:27.480]  They cited statutes that don't apply to the county at all.
[52:27.480 --> 52:33.480]  Okay. Again, what does the notice say about the tax?
[52:34.480 --> 52:36.480]  It didn't reference it.
[52:37.480 --> 52:38.480]  It didn't reference anything.
[52:39.480 --> 52:45.480]  It referenced statutes that don't apply to the county and it failed to reference the proposed tax hike.
[52:46.480 --> 52:53.480]  Okay. So that's not evidence of anything relating to the tax hike other than it has nothing to do with the tax hike, right?
[52:53.480 --> 52:56.480]  Which in my mind would be...
[52:57.480 --> 53:04.480]  Well, we're not talking about what's in your mind. We're talking about what the law and the court is going to accept as verified proof.
[53:05.480 --> 53:07.480]  Well, they're going to accept whatever they want to accept.
[53:08.480 --> 53:10.480]  No, there are things they would have to accept.
[53:10.480 --> 53:26.480]  But the point I'm trying to make is this article isn't it unless you can prove that the commissioners' court is using this article that you have as the basis for their public notice for this specific tax.
[53:27.480 --> 53:33.480]  Which if it doesn't mention that tax, you're going to have a hard time doing and that's one of them says on the record that's how they were attempting to do it.
[53:34.480 --> 53:35.480]  You get me?
[53:36.480 --> 53:36.480]  Yes.
[53:36.480 --> 54:04.480]  So the evidence you need is something from the newspaper's plural that they are required to circulate this information in stating that the county commissioners' court never hired out an ad of any size or shape with any wording mentioning that bill or act or tax hike or whatever.
[54:04.480 --> 54:06.480]  Yeah, that would be the argument.
[54:06.480 --> 54:07.480]  Correct.
[54:07.480 --> 54:21.480]  No, that's not the argument. You need documented evidence from each newspaper they would have been required to publish it in that no such article was ever taken out in that paper by the county commissioners' court.
[54:22.480 --> 54:28.480]  You need something in writing from each of those newspapers stating that they never published any such article for the commissioners' court.
[54:29.480 --> 54:33.480]  Well, first of all, we're only dealing with one newspaper. That's all there is.
[54:33.480 --> 54:35.480]  Okay, again, you're missing my point.
[54:37.480 --> 54:42.480]  The point being, I don't care if there's one or 30 in the Frickin County, okay?
[54:44.480 --> 54:45.480]  Doesn't matter.
[54:45.480 --> 54:51.480]  Any of them, they were required to put it in and any means they were required to use.
[54:52.480 --> 54:59.480]  Now, the other question is, is how many of them must they do versus how many of them are alternatives to doing one or the other?
[54:59.480 --> 55:02.480]  That's the other part of the statute you need to be very clear on.
[55:04.480 --> 55:25.480]  Did they A, have to post it in the paper and B, public notice down at, let's say, the local main office for the city or the county commissioners' court or at the county clerk's office or anything like that, or can they put the notice in one or the other?
[55:26.480 --> 55:27.480]  You see what I'm saying?
[55:27.480 --> 55:29.480]  Well, if I recall...
[55:29.480 --> 55:37.480]  I'm not asking you to recall. I'm asking you to be sure about what those requirements are because they're going to be part of the way it would have to be argued.
[55:38.480 --> 55:46.480]  I'm pretty sure that, according to the Texas Open Meetings Act, they got a circulated and widely circulated paper.
[55:46.480 --> 55:57.480]  The Texas Open Meetings Act says how they have to give public notice of what exactly, specifically taxes or anything that they're doing.
[55:58.480 --> 56:05.480]  What does the Texas Open Meetings Act have to do with the institution of a tax other than governing the meeting itself?
[56:08.480 --> 56:10.480]  Well, they have to give proper public notice because they're going to...
[56:10.480 --> 56:16.480]  In relation to the Open Meetings Act, they have to give proper notice of the meeting.
[56:17.480 --> 56:19.480]  Yeah, of the meeting.
[56:19.480 --> 56:25.480]  Okay. That's not a publication about the tax. You understand what I'm saying?
[56:26.480 --> 56:27.480]  Yeah.
[56:27.480 --> 56:32.480]  So you're not making your point clear to me. You're not going to make it a point clear to a court.
[56:32.480 --> 56:39.480]  So that's where we're kind of running at odd angles here and not completely parallel.
[56:40.480 --> 56:54.480]  Open Meetings Act requirements says how much notice they have to give in relation to whatever meeting they're having, what the public accessibility of that meeting is, what the record-keeping requirements for that meeting are, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[56:54.480 --> 57:02.480]  Also, they have to give what the content of that meeting is going to be, what they're going to be discussing.
[57:03.480 --> 57:05.480]  Okay. That's all well and good.
[57:06.480 --> 57:13.480]  But in relation to the tax itself, you have a claim that they held an illegal meeting.
[57:14.480 --> 57:22.480]  Maybe so, in which case you might, and I say might, have an argument that anything they did in that meeting is null and void.
[57:22.480 --> 57:23.480]  Okay?
[57:24.480 --> 57:25.480]  Yeah.
[57:25.480 --> 57:28.480]  That's one argument, but it's completely separate from an illegal tax argument.
[57:31.480 --> 57:32.480]  You get me?
[57:33.480 --> 57:34.480]  Okay.
[57:34.480 --> 57:39.480]  So this is where you need to get each set of ducks in their own row and stop mixing them together.
[57:40.480 --> 57:41.480]  Okay.
[57:41.480 --> 57:51.480]  Now, in relation to the tax code, what does the tax code say the requirement for notice is of any new tax implemented by the commissioner's court?
[57:52.480 --> 57:54.480]  Which is where I would think you would find anything in relation to that.
[57:55.480 --> 58:00.480]  Proper public notice with the same requirements of circulating a widely-
[58:01.480 --> 58:02.480]  Okay.
[58:02.480 --> 58:04.480]  Then what I said still holds true.
[58:04.480 --> 58:13.480]  What I said still holds true. You have two separate issues, two separate things requiring separate types of evidence.
[58:14.480 --> 58:27.480]  Evidence that there was no proper notice to the public about the meeting or its purpose, and then evidence that there was no proper public notice relating to a new tax they created at this so-called illegal meeting.
[58:28.480 --> 58:29.480]  Check and check.
[58:29.480 --> 58:30.480]  Got them.
[58:30.480 --> 58:31.480]  Okay.
[58:31.480 --> 58:32.480]  That's what you're looking for.
[58:32.480 --> 58:33.480]  That's where you need to go.
[58:33.480 --> 58:35.480]  That's how you need to fight.
[58:36.480 --> 58:37.480]  Okay.
[58:37.480 --> 58:38.480]  My opinion.
[58:39.480 --> 58:40.480]  Okay?
[58:40.480 --> 58:41.480]  Okay.
[58:41.480 --> 58:42.480]  All right, man.
[58:42.480 --> 58:43.480]  You got anything else?
[58:43.480 --> 58:44.480]  I got to take a break.
[58:45.480 --> 58:46.480]  No, man.
[58:46.480 --> 58:47.480]  I'll hang it off.
[58:47.480 --> 58:48.480]  Thanks, Eddie.
[58:48.480 --> 58:55.480]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:55.480 --> 59:03.480]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:04.480 --> 59:06.480]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:06.480 --> 59:15.480]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:15.480 --> 59:25.480]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:25.480 --> 59:30.480]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:30.480 --> 59:41.480]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102.
[59:41.480 --> 59:46.480]  Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:46.480 --> 01:00:15.480]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:16.480 --> 01:00:26.480]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:00:46.480 --> 01:01:08.480]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:01:08.480 --> 01:01:19.480]  In recent news, several Texas-based organizations filed a lawsuit today requesting that a federal court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally registered to vote.
[01:01:19.480 --> 01:01:32.480]  The list was compiled after an 11-month-long investigation by the Office of the Texas Secretary of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety, which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens who were registered to vote when obtaining age-arvest license.
[01:01:32.480 --> 01:01:44.480]  Over half of the 95,000 didn't indeed vote, it seems. However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:01:44.480 --> 01:01:50.480]  Apparently, around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:01:50.480 --> 01:01:56.480]  Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond with proof of eligibility.
[01:01:56.480 --> 01:02:05.480]  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[01:02:05.480 --> 01:02:16.480]  A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck after a vape pen exploded while he was using it.
[01:02:16.480 --> 01:02:20.480]  It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[01:02:20.480 --> 01:02:29.480]  An X-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem. The vape store's smoke and vape DZ has refused to comment.
[01:02:29.480 --> 01:02:40.480]  First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz, interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association Conference,
[01:02:40.480 --> 01:02:47.480]  which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February 14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[01:02:47.480 --> 01:02:51.480]  You can find the interview at kiiitv.com.
[01:02:51.480 --> 01:03:20.480]  This is Rick Brody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[01:03:21.480 --> 01:03:31.480]  I'm Rick Brody, the executive director of Grow Local.
[01:03:51.480 --> 01:04:12.480]  The creature man says it's the end of time and the Mississippi River she's a gold grime.
[01:04:12.480 --> 01:04:23.480]  The interest is up and the stock market's down and you're only getting mugged if you go downtown.
[01:04:23.480 --> 01:04:27.480]  I live back in the woods you see.
[01:04:27.480 --> 01:04:36.480]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:04:36.480 --> 01:04:42.480]  Okay, now we have Troy in Texas.
[01:04:42.480 --> 01:04:52.480]  My board is asking me for information I don't have here just yet, so I can get back in to you.
[01:04:52.480 --> 01:05:07.480]  Alright Troy, go ahead. Yes, I wanted to ask you, basically a person does have a right to open a bank account without a social security number.
[01:05:07.480 --> 01:05:22.480]  I wanted to ask if you go try to do that and they just laugh at you and deny you because you say I am a religious objector, I'm using a number to be numbered.
[01:05:22.480 --> 01:05:37.480]  And then wanting to do some type of lawsuit, like small claims or civil? Well, you're so criminal.
[01:05:37.480 --> 01:05:42.480]  It doesn't matter if it's a state or local bank, it's FDIC insured.
[01:05:42.480 --> 01:05:49.480]  They're basing their requirement to have that on federal law that says exactly the opposite.
[01:05:49.480 --> 01:06:01.480]  Federal law specifically says that states are required to request a number and then gives them explicit instructions on what to do if a number is never given.
[01:06:01.480 --> 01:06:10.480]  Okay? They instead created their own internal policies that they would not open accounts without a number.
[01:06:10.480 --> 01:06:20.480]  Okay? That's discrimination because what they're trying to do is compel Americans, which are not required to have a social security number,
[01:06:20.480 --> 01:06:32.480]  into the same requirements as aliens who are the only ones who can man be required to obtain the number in order to live and work in the U.S.
[01:06:32.480 --> 01:06:36.480]  Are you ice skating or something?
[01:06:36.480 --> 01:06:40.480]  No, I'm driving.
[01:06:40.480 --> 01:06:47.480]  And yes, I do mean drive, but I'm in truck. Not travel and I'm drive.
[01:06:47.480 --> 01:06:48.480]  Okay.
[01:06:48.480 --> 01:06:54.480]  Okay, so that would be, I would have to do a federal suit.
[01:06:54.480 --> 01:07:02.480]  Yeah, and you would have to understand the law that regulates the banks in relation to that number and how that they are attempting to
[01:07:02.480 --> 01:07:15.480]  circumvent the rights of the people and convert them into alien individuals, which is the only people that number is required to be given to.
[01:07:15.480 --> 01:07:16.480]  Okay.
[01:07:16.480 --> 01:07:17.480]  Yeah, I just wanted to be sure of it.
[01:07:17.480 --> 01:07:20.480]  Yeah, it's a form of discrimination.
[01:07:20.480 --> 01:07:27.480]  It's discriminatory based upon nationality.
[01:07:27.480 --> 01:07:29.480]  Okay.
[01:07:29.480 --> 01:07:47.480]  Now, sometimes I hear Randy say, if you write up a tort letter that you're going to take action, sometimes maybe you wouldn't actually have to file this suit
[01:07:47.480 --> 01:07:52.480]  if they wanted to, you know, make some type of agreement or something.
[01:07:52.480 --> 01:08:05.480]  I think the banks are more afraid of the IRS and the federal government yanking their ability and license to be a bank or you ensuing them for $100 in a local court.
[01:08:05.480 --> 01:08:10.480]  Yeah, $100.
[01:08:10.480 --> 01:08:12.480]  You get my point.
[01:08:12.480 --> 01:08:19.480]  If Randy's ever had the experience with that work, great, but I can't say that I have.
[01:08:19.480 --> 01:08:21.480]  No, no, I haven't.
[01:08:21.480 --> 01:08:31.480]  In previous instances, I have managed to open them without a social, but they immediately tried to close them afterward.
[01:08:31.480 --> 01:08:47.480]  They also tried to close one once when I signed their signature card with UCC Reservation of Rights, which in relation to a bank signature card, that's the proper place to apply the UCC requirement for the signature.
[01:08:47.480 --> 01:08:54.480]  Unlike it is for most of the other things we're talking about in the Patronut community, but that's the proper place to actually use it.
[01:08:54.480 --> 01:09:00.480]  They tried to come in and make me fill out a new card saying they were going to close my account if I didn't take that off.
[01:09:00.480 --> 01:09:04.480]  And I told them, I said, look, I've had this account for two weeks.
[01:09:04.480 --> 01:09:06.480]  It's got money in it.
[01:09:06.480 --> 01:09:11.480]  I have met every requirement that you people have that is legally backed for me to have it.
[01:09:11.480 --> 01:09:18.480]  Therefore, if you touch that money or that account, I will sue you and I have the means to do it at this time.
[01:09:18.480 --> 01:09:20.480]  And they never closed my account.
[01:09:20.480 --> 01:09:25.480]  They never made me change the card.
[01:09:25.480 --> 01:09:37.480]  So that's the difference in some of the things that are going on where people are trying to use the UCC and it doesn't apply versus where it does apply.
[01:09:37.480 --> 01:09:44.480]  And a bank signature card is definitely one of those places where it does apply.
[01:09:44.480 --> 01:10:02.480]  Okay, well, in something like this that I'm describing, would a tort letter be any good or would you just go ahead and just do the action?
[01:10:02.480 --> 01:10:09.480]  I think they're going to get noticed when you file the case and serve them.
[01:10:09.480 --> 01:10:10.480]  I got you.
[01:10:10.480 --> 01:10:15.480]  I was just thinking because it's $250, I think, to file a federal.
[01:10:15.480 --> 01:10:19.480]  So I was just thinking, you know, $450.
[01:10:19.480 --> 01:10:21.480]  Oh, $450.
[01:10:21.480 --> 01:10:24.480]  Or $475, something like that.
[01:10:24.480 --> 01:10:28.480]  Those are things that we're not supposed to have to pay.
[01:10:28.480 --> 01:10:32.480]  There's even court cases that says we don't have to pay those fees.
[01:10:32.480 --> 01:10:37.480]  But, oh well.
[01:10:37.480 --> 01:10:53.480]  Would your due process course explain how to do this type of suit or would that be more in the Jurisdictionary program that y'all also offered?
[01:10:53.480 --> 01:11:01.480]  Well, Jurisdictionary is about filing lawsuits, though it is not about filing lawsuits against government agencies or entities.
[01:11:01.480 --> 01:11:07.480]  It's about filing civil lawsuits against other people and how to prosecute that suit.
[01:11:07.480 --> 01:11:21.480]  It gives you some good pointers on things you need to know in any suit, but it doesn't really help as much when it comes to suing a governmentally backed and represented entity.
[01:11:21.480 --> 01:11:24.480]  How about your due process courses?
[01:11:24.480 --> 01:11:27.480]  My traffic seminar is all about criminal law.
[01:11:27.480 --> 01:11:39.480]  It's got nothing to do with a civil lawsuit because Texas treats traffic citations as criminal.
[01:11:39.480 --> 01:11:40.480]  Okay.
[01:11:40.480 --> 01:11:44.480]  Well, when somebody discriminates against you, isn't that criminal?
[01:11:44.480 --> 01:11:46.480]  Not something you can sue them for criminally.
[01:11:46.480 --> 01:11:50.480]  You have to sue them civilly.
[01:11:50.480 --> 01:11:51.480]  Okay.
[01:11:51.480 --> 01:11:52.480]  I got you.
[01:11:52.480 --> 01:11:58.480]  Unless I was to, you know, call the police and say, hey, they just denied me.
[01:11:58.480 --> 01:12:05.480]  Well, again, that type of discrimination is civil, not criminal.
[01:12:05.480 --> 01:12:12.480]  And you couldn't bring the, you couldn't make the charge, but you couldn't do anything to prosecute or to see it through.
[01:12:12.480 --> 01:12:18.480]  The government would have to make that charge criminally and they would have to prosecute it.
[01:12:18.480 --> 01:12:20.480]  It doesn't get you anything.
[01:12:20.480 --> 01:12:29.480]  The only time something like that helps you is if there is an actual established remedy where you can sue for that criminal act.
[01:12:29.480 --> 01:12:36.480]  Again, something the courts have created, not that exists in reality of how this is supposed to be set up.
[01:12:36.480 --> 01:12:44.480]  If someone harms you in any way, you're supposed to have the right to remedy, no matter what that harm is.
[01:12:44.480 --> 01:12:53.480]  But the courts have made it where you only get remedy in certain cases as they see it.
[01:12:53.480 --> 01:12:54.480]  Okay.
[01:12:54.480 --> 01:12:57.480]  I got you.
[01:12:57.480 --> 01:13:00.480]  Well, I got one other question I wanted to ask you.
[01:13:00.480 --> 01:13:09.480]  When I was getting the driver's license, I noticed on the form it asked, are you a U.S. citizen?
[01:13:09.480 --> 01:13:13.480]  And it also asked, are you a U.S. national?
[01:13:13.480 --> 01:13:16.480]  And I was wondering what the actual difference is.
[01:13:16.480 --> 01:13:19.480]  Did you look up the definitions for both terms to see?
[01:13:19.480 --> 01:13:20.480]  No.
[01:13:20.480 --> 01:13:22.480]  Then that's what you need to do.
[01:13:22.480 --> 01:13:24.480]  Then you'll understand the difference.
[01:13:24.480 --> 01:13:26.480]  Look them up in the traffic code?
[01:13:26.480 --> 01:13:27.480]  No.
[01:13:27.480 --> 01:13:29.480]  Transportation code?
[01:13:29.480 --> 01:13:37.480]  When you apply it, are you looking at the state code or are you looking, or what does the state code base those definitions on?
[01:13:37.480 --> 01:13:41.480]  You can go down and ask the people at the DMV.
[01:13:41.480 --> 01:13:47.480]  Where is the law that governs these two terms right here?
[01:13:47.480 --> 01:13:50.480]  Is it federal or is it state?
[01:13:50.480 --> 01:13:53.480]  And if it's federal, where?
[01:13:53.480 --> 01:13:55.480]  And see if they can tell you.
[01:13:55.480 --> 01:14:04.480]  If it's federal, I guarantee you it's going to be something that is going to be very difficult for you to use against them.
[01:14:04.480 --> 01:14:15.480]  Because technically speaking, if the state is basing anything they're doing in an act on federal law, then the state is limited in the application of law to what the federal law says.
[01:14:15.480 --> 01:14:26.480]  They cannot enhance or do something different in any law that is based upon what the federal law requirements are.
[01:14:26.480 --> 01:14:32.480]  They can't rewrite federal law to suit the state.
[01:14:32.480 --> 01:14:40.480]  Okay, well I was thinking since it's an application for a state driver's license, you're misunderstanding.
[01:14:40.480 --> 01:14:50.480]  State driver's licenses, the issue becomes where did the state get the authority to require the license in the first place?
[01:14:50.480 --> 01:15:08.480]  And if they based that requirement on Title 49 of the United States Code, which is the federal law that created driver's licenses, then the state is bound to the same limits as the federal law sets.
[01:15:08.480 --> 01:15:13.480]  No matter how they write it.
[01:15:13.480 --> 01:15:28.480]  Why? Because the subject matter of the federal law is just as limited within the state as it is anywhere else and the state can't change it or expand it.
[01:15:28.480 --> 01:15:30.480]  Got it?
[01:15:30.480 --> 01:15:33.480]  Yes, yes, you made it very clear.
[01:15:33.480 --> 01:15:43.480]  Okay, I'm going to check some of that stuff out. I appreciate talking to you and I will be sending in a donation to help.
[01:15:43.480 --> 01:15:44.480]  Appreciate it.
[01:15:44.480 --> 01:15:45.480]  Thank you very much.
[01:15:45.480 --> 01:15:46.480]  Yes, sir. Thank you.
[01:15:46.480 --> 01:15:47.480]  Okay.
[01:15:47.480 --> 01:15:51.480]  Have a good one and be safe out there.
[01:15:51.480 --> 01:15:57.480]  All right, now we have Mike in Arizona. Let's see.
[01:15:57.480 --> 01:16:01.480]  Mike, what can we do for you?
[01:16:01.480 --> 01:16:02.480]  Hello?
[01:16:02.480 --> 01:16:03.480]  Hey.
[01:16:03.480 --> 01:16:04.480]  Hey.
[01:16:04.480 --> 01:16:09.480]  Sorry about that. I didn't realize that nobody asked me what my name was and I don't know how you got it.
[01:16:09.480 --> 01:16:13.480]  Because it comes up on your phone number here.
[01:16:13.480 --> 01:16:17.480]  Oh, interesting. I just had one quick one for you, Eddie.
[01:16:17.480 --> 01:16:18.480]  Okay.
[01:16:18.480 --> 01:16:29.480]  Back on 11-1309, you guys had a gentleman by the name of Eric Madden who's with an organization known as Team Law on the Radio Show.
[01:16:29.480 --> 01:16:35.480]  11-1309. When you say y'all, which show had them?
[01:16:35.480 --> 01:16:36.480]  Had them.
[01:16:36.480 --> 01:16:38.480]  It was you, Deborah and Randy.
[01:16:38.480 --> 01:16:39.480]  Okay.
[01:16:39.480 --> 01:16:41.480]  Eric Madsen.
[01:16:41.480 --> 01:16:49.480]  I don't recall, but let me take this break and we'll come back and I'll figure out what your query on that point is, okay?
[01:16:49.480 --> 01:16:50.480]  All right, thank you.
[01:16:50.480 --> 01:16:51.480]  Yep.
[01:16:51.480 --> 01:17:00.480]  All right, folks. We'll be right back after this break, so y'all hanging in there.
[01:17:00.480 --> 01:17:05.480]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.480 --> 01:17:09.480]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[01:17:09.480 --> 01:17:14.480]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.480 --> 01:17:20.480]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:17:20.480 --> 01:17:24.480]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons?
[01:17:24.480 --> 01:17:26.480]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.480 --> 01:17:28.480]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:28.480 --> 01:17:33.480]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:17:33.480 --> 01:17:38.480]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.480 --> 01:17:40.480]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.480 --> 01:17:49.480]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.480 --> 01:18:00.480]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.480 --> 01:18:01.480]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.480 --> 01:18:04.480]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.480 --> 01:18:07.480]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.480 --> 01:18:08.480]  I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.480 --> 01:18:13.480]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.480 --> 01:18:20.480]  I love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.480 --> 01:18:22.480]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.480 --> 01:18:24.480]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.480 --> 01:18:29.480]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.480 --> 01:18:31.480]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.480 --> 01:18:34.480]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.480 --> 01:18:37.480]  Click on the Amazon logo and book market.
[01:18:37.480 --> 01:18:43.480]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.480 --> 01:18:44.480]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.480 --> 01:18:45.480]  No.
[01:18:45.480 --> 01:18:47.480]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.480 --> 01:18:48.480]  No.
[01:18:48.480 --> 01:18:49.480]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.480 --> 01:18:50.480]  No.
[01:18:50.480 --> 01:18:51.480]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.480 --> 01:18:52.480]  Wow.
[01:18:52.480 --> 01:18:54.480]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.480 --> 01:18:55.480]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.480 --> 01:18:56.480]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.480 --> 01:18:58.480]  We are Logos.
[01:18:58.480 --> 01:19:00.480]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:00.480 --> 01:19:07.480]  This is the Logos, Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.480 --> 01:19:58.480]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:58.480 --> 01:20:00.480]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:20:00.480 --> 01:20:08.480]  We are coming up on the bottom of the hour here, and we are talking to Mike in Arizona.
[01:20:08.480 --> 01:20:16.480]  All right, Mike, you had a question about Eric Mazden on a show we did back in 09.
[01:20:16.480 --> 01:20:22.480]  Yeah, I was just curious if you had had any more experience with him or his organization, TeamLog,
[01:20:22.480 --> 01:20:28.480]  other than just the little bit he might have been on the show or that he was on the show?
[01:20:28.480 --> 01:20:30.480]  I personally have not.
[01:20:30.480 --> 01:20:38.480]  I've heard of TeamLog even since then, but I haven't had any interaction with him or anything like that.
[01:20:38.480 --> 01:20:40.480]  Why do you ask?
[01:20:40.480 --> 01:20:49.480]  I'm just trying to basically not searching land and land ownership because I'd like to here in a few years to buy some land,
[01:20:49.480 --> 01:20:57.480]  and I want to be equipped with all the information I need to make sure I know what I'm getting and so forth,
[01:20:57.480 --> 01:21:03.480]  and that I don't contractually obligate myself to anything that I do not want to.
[01:21:03.480 --> 01:21:13.480]  And I believe that aspect of that could be property taxation and homeowners associations and things of that nature.
[01:21:13.480 --> 01:21:24.480]  I know some people that say that they've helped them, but that's been a while since the last report of that that I've heard,
[01:21:24.480 --> 01:21:33.480]  and I still don't know what the final outcome of even that instance was because they said the last thing they were discussing
[01:21:33.480 --> 01:21:38.480]  was that they had gone to these people that had gotten the paperwork that they were needing to file,
[01:21:38.480 --> 01:21:44.480]  and they had gotten it filed and had been waiting for an answer for it for X amount of time,
[01:21:44.480 --> 01:21:52.480]  which the time limit had expired for which the answer was due, et cetera, et cetera, but that's as much of it as I know.
[01:21:52.480 --> 01:21:56.480]  I don't know what the final disposition or outcome of it was in any way.
[01:21:56.480 --> 01:21:58.480]  Okay.
[01:21:58.480 --> 01:22:05.480]  Other than that, I recall you talking about you had a bit of an experience in property tax related matters.
[01:22:05.480 --> 01:22:12.480]  I did when the tax assessor was trying to defraud my mother of a property, yeah.
[01:22:12.480 --> 01:22:24.480]  And I challenged him on it and actually got them to back down, and they quit sending her property tax notices till the day she died.
[01:22:24.480 --> 01:22:31.480]  Is there, from your research into that, I know you're in Texas, obviously, different legislative things for different states,
[01:22:31.480 --> 01:22:37.480]  but if you could, is there any key points when researching those issues to, like, look out for?
[01:22:37.480 --> 01:22:47.480]  It all depends on how land in your particular state is granted to it or transferred to the possession of individuals, okay?
[01:22:47.480 --> 01:22:55.480]  Here in Texas, it was always done by land patent, and the land patent was an ironclad contract between the state and the individual,
[01:22:55.480 --> 01:23:04.480]  and the land patent's language specifically said that the state relinquishes all claims and title forever to that piece of land,
[01:23:04.480 --> 01:23:12.480]  and that it can be transferred to any heirs and assigns of the original person forever, okay?
[01:23:12.480 --> 01:23:19.480]  And the state can't do anything with it or about it because they have relinquished all claims and title, okay?
[01:23:19.480 --> 01:23:27.480]  That right there means that just because they put a fence around it doesn't mean they get to call it theirs and tax it.
[01:23:27.480 --> 01:23:34.480]  When you say you relinquish all claims and title to something, that's exactly what it means.
[01:23:34.480 --> 01:23:42.480]  It doesn't mean, oh, except, well, you have to pay me rent for it because that would be a claim, wouldn't it?
[01:23:42.480 --> 01:23:43.480]  Absolutely.
[01:23:43.480 --> 01:23:50.480]  But if you relinquish all claims, there can't be a claim like that that exists, can there?
[01:23:50.480 --> 01:23:52.480]  You wouldn't think.
[01:23:52.480 --> 01:23:57.480]  So it's a contradiction of the terms of the contract.
[01:23:57.480 --> 01:24:03.480]  And since the state government is forbidden to impair the obligation of contracts,
[01:24:03.480 --> 01:24:12.480]  the state government is forbidden to institute a tax on private property that is covered by a land patent.
[01:24:12.480 --> 01:24:18.480]  One would think that would be very simple math, even for somebody with a bar card.
[01:24:18.480 --> 01:24:26.480]  You know, I'm honestly in the belief that the more likely you are in the longer you've maintained possession of a bar card,
[01:24:26.480 --> 01:24:34.480]  the dumber you actually become about law itself.
[01:24:34.480 --> 01:24:43.480]  Because you start to rely on the inner workings of the system rather than the law to get the outcome you want.
[01:24:43.480 --> 01:24:51.480]  And that is not how we set this up to work.
[01:24:51.480 --> 01:25:00.480]  With that said, from the little bit of research I've done, for example, in Arizona, the patents are federal.
[01:25:00.480 --> 01:25:01.480]  Yes.
[01:25:01.480 --> 01:25:04.480]  And it's the same deal, two year heirs and a signs forever.
[01:25:04.480 --> 01:25:05.480]  Yes.
[01:25:05.480 --> 01:25:10.480]  And just like I told Tony at the beginning, the state never had a claim to that land.
[01:25:10.480 --> 01:25:11.480]  Never.
[01:25:11.480 --> 01:25:14.480]  So how did they suddenly get one?
[01:25:14.480 --> 01:25:22.480]  I'm curious if something happened when, there's a thing I've been reading about called the Torrens Act or Torrens Title.
[01:25:22.480 --> 01:25:24.480]  Created by who?
[01:25:24.480 --> 01:25:26.480]  Robert Torrens.
[01:25:26.480 --> 01:25:28.480]  No, at what level?
[01:25:28.480 --> 01:25:30.480]  By the state or by the Fed?
[01:25:30.480 --> 01:25:32.480]  I think it was at the state level.
[01:25:32.480 --> 01:25:37.480]  How can the state level create an act that overrides a federal agreement?
[01:25:37.480 --> 01:25:44.480]  If the property owner contractually obligates themselves, or excuse me, their property to the state.
[01:25:44.480 --> 01:25:45.480]  Yeah.
[01:25:45.480 --> 01:25:48.480]  But they do that in ways other than property tax.
[01:25:48.480 --> 01:26:02.480]  They would have to do something like say, I agree to put up X amount of land as collateral for taxes to fund X amount of X part of this bill for funds.
[01:26:02.480 --> 01:26:06.480]  Say to build a bridge or some memorial or something like that.
[01:26:06.480 --> 01:26:16.480]  You have to put up your land as collateral in order to pay the obligation you promised for some portion of that tax to that purpose.
[01:26:16.480 --> 01:26:21.480]  And if you do that, then the state's claim to your property as collateral ends.
[01:26:21.480 --> 01:26:28.480]  And if you don't, then they can seize the property as collateral for your agreed amount that you never paid.
[01:26:28.480 --> 01:26:29.480]  You get it?
[01:26:29.480 --> 01:26:30.480]  Yeah.
[01:26:30.480 --> 01:26:36.480]  That would be contracting your land to the state and putting it under contract and agreement to them that would give them some power to touch it.
[01:26:36.480 --> 01:26:40.480]  Otherwise, where do they get it?
[01:26:40.480 --> 01:26:47.480]  From what I've read a couple things that say from the very few deeds that I've read.
[01:26:47.480 --> 01:26:49.480]  No, no, no, no, no.
[01:26:49.480 --> 01:26:51.480]  A deed is not a land patent.
[01:26:51.480 --> 01:26:53.480]  Not by a long shot.
[01:26:53.480 --> 01:27:00.480]  Just like I told Tony, a deed is not ownership other than legal ownership.
[01:27:00.480 --> 01:27:06.480]  Have you ever looked at the definition of equity ownership versus legal ownership?
[01:27:06.480 --> 01:27:11.480]  Yes, but I don't have it right off the top of my head and I butcher it.
[01:27:11.480 --> 01:27:15.480]  Equity ownership gives you the right to do anything and everything with that property.
[01:27:15.480 --> 01:27:21.480]  Uninhibited, unencumbered in any way, including destroy it, okay?
[01:27:21.480 --> 01:27:29.480]  Legal ownership gives you the right to possession and use, but not disposition or transfer.
[01:27:29.480 --> 01:27:31.480]  Not, okay.
[01:27:31.480 --> 01:27:37.480]  A deed is legal ownership, not equity ownership.
[01:27:37.480 --> 01:27:43.480]  Thus, it is very different from a land patent.
[01:27:43.480 --> 01:27:54.480]  So when somebody goes and buys a piece of land from somebody, just for this example, let's say private sale, cash, no mortgage, no banks involved,
[01:27:54.480 --> 01:28:04.480]  and what is used as a warranty deed to transfer it, how is anything of substance actually getting transferred with that?
[01:28:04.480 --> 01:28:14.480]  First thing is, is you have to find out what land patent that parcel of land you purchased was originally part of, okay?
[01:28:14.480 --> 01:28:25.480]  Then you're going to have to go back to the last person in possession of an updated patent that included that parcel of land you purchased.
[01:28:25.480 --> 01:28:37.480]  Then they're going to have to fill out the proper paperwork to delegate that parcel to you via a new assigned land patent, heirs and assigns, remember?
[01:28:37.480 --> 01:28:38.480]  Yeah.
[01:28:38.480 --> 01:28:46.480]  Okay, so as an assign, you are someone who purchased that property from a patent holder.
[01:28:46.480 --> 01:28:55.480]  Thus, the same terms of the patent apply versus transfer through deed where the patent is inapplicable.
[01:28:55.480 --> 01:28:58.480]  Okay.
[01:28:58.480 --> 01:29:13.480]  So what I'm trying to get at is, in theory, you can buy some piece of land through a warranty deed and the person who's selling it to you isn't one of the heirs or assigns to that initial patent,
[01:29:13.480 --> 01:29:19.480]  then you'd have to basically go and search them, the true heirs or assigns the original patent.
[01:29:19.480 --> 01:29:24.480]  That's absolutely correct.
[01:29:24.480 --> 01:29:29.480]  And how the heck does the person who sold you just the whatever the...
[01:29:29.480 --> 01:29:34.480]  You could actually, if you were a dishonest individual, you could actually displace that person.
[01:29:34.480 --> 01:29:46.480]  You could actually go to the one who holds the last valid land patent and say, I bought all of this land right here and I need you to give me an updated copy of the patent so I can go file the paperwork.
[01:29:46.480 --> 01:29:56.480]  And if you wouldn't file that paperwork, you would nullify their deed because your paperwork has superior authority over theirs.
[01:29:56.480 --> 01:29:57.480]  Get it?
[01:29:57.480 --> 01:30:01.480]  Well, hang on just a second.
[01:30:01.480 --> 01:30:03.480]  Living alone is no fun.
[01:30:03.480 --> 01:30:10.480]  For one thing, you have to do all the chores by yourself, but new evidence suggests it may also increase the risk of becoming depressed.
[01:30:10.480 --> 01:30:16.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details on loneliness and mental health next.
[01:30:41.480 --> 01:30:54.480]  We all know the elderly are more prone to depression if they live alone, but new research suggests that same pattern may also affect younger working age adults.
[01:30:54.480 --> 01:31:02.480]  In a study of 3,500 people aged 30 to 65, researchers found that a quarter of those living alone took antidepressants.
[01:31:02.480 --> 01:31:06.480]  That's almost double the rate of those who live with spouses, family or roommates.
[01:31:06.480 --> 01:31:12.480]  Did living alone cause depression or do depression-prone people simply prefer solitude?
[01:31:12.480 --> 01:31:20.480]  Both explanations are plausible, but there's one important wake-up call to all of us to reach out to friends, family members and neighbors who live alone.
[01:31:20.480 --> 01:31:24.480]  Some human contact could make all the difference in their world.
[01:31:24.480 --> 01:31:30.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.480 --> 01:31:36.480]  I lost my son, my uncle and my nephew on September 11, 2000.
[01:31:36.480 --> 01:31:40.480]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:40.480 --> 01:31:44.480]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:44.480 --> 01:31:48.480]  The official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[01:31:48.480 --> 01:31:54.480]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:54.480 --> 01:31:58.480]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:58.480 --> 01:32:02.480]  Why it fell, why it matters as what you can do.
[01:32:02.480 --> 01:32:05.480]  Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic similar.
[01:32:05.480 --> 01:32:13.480]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.480 --> 01:32:20.480]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.480 --> 01:32:26.480]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.480 --> 01:32:35.480]  The former sheriff's deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.480 --> 01:32:41.480]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.480 --> 01:32:48.480]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:48.480 --> 01:32:51.480]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.480 --> 01:32:59.480]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:59.480 --> 01:33:17.480]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.480 --> 01:33:34.480]  Logos Radio Network
[01:33:59.480 --> 01:34:04.480]  Logos Radio Network
[01:34:24.480 --> 01:34:28.480]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:28.480 --> 01:34:31.480]  Now we are still talking with Mike in Arizona.
[01:34:31.480 --> 01:34:34.480]  Alright, Mike, go ahead.
[01:34:34.480 --> 01:34:43.480]  Well, hell, back to patents and excuse deeds and patents.
[01:34:43.480 --> 01:34:49.480]  Since a deed is legal title.
[01:34:49.480 --> 01:34:52.480]  Yes.
[01:34:52.480 --> 01:35:05.480]  How can, I guess, what's a good way to be sure that you can even find a patent holder if there is even a good way?
[01:35:05.480 --> 01:35:12.480]  Well, you're going to have to go to whatever your state land office is. They're the recorder and issuer of all patents.
[01:35:12.480 --> 01:35:13.480]  Okay.
[01:35:13.480 --> 01:35:19.480]  See, here in Texas, the governor is the one who had to sign the land patent.
[01:35:19.480 --> 01:35:32.480]  When the land was issued, the agreement was between the state of Texas represented by the governor of the state as the one transferring the property to private ownership of the individual forever.
[01:35:32.480 --> 01:35:39.480]  Now at the federal level, I don't know who that's going to be for sure in Arizona.
[01:35:39.480 --> 01:35:47.480]  It should be your land office, but it may be a federal land office since that's where all the original land titles come from.
[01:35:47.480 --> 01:35:48.480]  Okay.
[01:35:48.480 --> 01:35:51.480]  Alright.
[01:35:51.480 --> 01:35:54.480]  Well, I think that's about it for now.
[01:35:54.480 --> 01:35:57.480]  Now, Tony said that he managed to get his updated.
[01:35:57.480 --> 01:36:08.480]  So obviously, Tony knows somewhere to get it, and I don't know whether he got it in the state or if he got it through some federal entity, but he's managed to find where to get it.
[01:36:08.480 --> 01:36:09.480]  So...
[01:36:09.480 --> 01:36:14.480]  I've heard of people saying they're getting them updated, but just my understanding is...
[01:36:14.480 --> 01:36:25.480]  Updated simply means that you get the last good patent that was issued, and now you have an updated copy that's in your name for that parcel.
[01:36:25.480 --> 01:36:32.480]  That's all updated means is you get your own patent issued in your name for that parcel.
[01:36:32.480 --> 01:36:46.480]  I thought the deal with at least federal was that the patent was issued to the initial person who qualified for it under the variety of federal land acts such as the Mining Act, the Desert Reclamation Act, or the Homeland Act.
[01:36:46.480 --> 01:36:54.480]  Yes, but once the land was granted, it was granted forever to any and all heirs and assigns.
[01:36:54.480 --> 01:36:57.480]  That's the language in the patent.
[01:36:57.480 --> 01:37:05.480]  Those same restrictions are not held to the heirs or assigns.
[01:37:05.480 --> 01:37:21.480]  Yes, but if you had an assignment or you were an heir, in fact, having the initial patent that was granted to the initial patentee, you would be an heir or an assign in that case.
[01:37:21.480 --> 01:37:24.480]  Well, not necessarily.
[01:37:24.480 --> 01:37:33.480]  Just because you have a copy of the original patent, that doesn't make you someone that the property was actually given to as an heir.
[01:37:33.480 --> 01:37:34.480]  Okay?
[01:37:34.480 --> 01:37:37.480]  They could have left you out of the wheel for all that matter.
[01:37:37.480 --> 01:37:38.480]  You see what I'm saying?
[01:37:38.480 --> 01:37:39.480]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:37:39.480 --> 01:38:01.480]  In order to show that the patent is valid for you, then that patent has to be brought up to date in your name, specifically describing the parcel of that original patent that you are inheriting or you are purchasing as an assign.
[01:38:01.480 --> 01:38:10.480]  The private is that possession is being transferred. If they want to give it to you, you're an assign.
[01:38:10.480 --> 01:38:14.480]  Okay.
[01:38:14.480 --> 01:38:15.480]  Bill, that's about it.
[01:38:15.480 --> 01:38:29.480]  I had one more thing for you, and it was just, do you believe at any point in the future you would be not so quite as busy as you are now and you would be available for possible private consultation?
[01:38:29.480 --> 01:38:33.480]  At that point, you'd have to stand over my grave and say, I'm here to talk.
[01:38:33.480 --> 01:38:34.480]  Right.
[01:38:34.480 --> 01:38:44.480]  I have no idea that if some of the other stuff I'm waiting to come through comes through, I'm going to be 100 times busier than I am now, and that's going to be for years to come.
[01:38:44.480 --> 01:38:50.480]  So there's no way to know how my day is going to go from one to the next until I'm there.
[01:38:50.480 --> 01:38:53.480]  Okay.
[01:38:53.480 --> 01:38:55.480]  Well, all right.
[01:38:55.480 --> 01:38:56.480]  I appreciate it.
[01:38:56.480 --> 01:38:57.480]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:57.480 --> 01:38:58.480]  Thanks for calling.
[01:38:58.480 --> 01:38:59.480]  Thanks.
[01:38:59.480 --> 01:39:01.480]  Bye.
[01:39:01.480 --> 01:39:02.480]  All right.
[01:39:02.480 --> 01:39:04.480]  Now, let's see.
[01:39:04.480 --> 01:39:07.480]  Next up in line is Tyler in Wyoming.
[01:39:07.480 --> 01:39:09.480]  Tyler, what do you have?
[01:39:09.480 --> 01:39:11.480]  Eddie, how are you?
[01:39:11.480 --> 01:39:14.480]  Well, I am.
[01:39:14.480 --> 01:39:17.480]  I enjoyed your callers tonight.
[01:39:17.480 --> 01:39:20.480]  Speaking to your phone, Tyler.
[01:39:20.480 --> 01:39:21.480]  Sorry about that.
[01:39:21.480 --> 01:39:23.480]  I enjoyed your callers tonight.
[01:39:23.480 --> 01:39:25.480]  I just got a couple of quick questions.
[01:39:25.480 --> 01:39:35.480]  I wasn't going to ask this, but one of your previous callers made me think of it on the social security number.
[01:39:35.480 --> 01:39:46.480]  My insurance, when I was insuring vehicles, actually private autos, when I was insuring those, they said they needed my social.
[01:39:46.480 --> 01:39:48.480]  I said, well, I don't want to give it out.
[01:39:48.480 --> 01:39:54.480]  I said, there's spring court case because you don't have to give that number out for any kind of business transaction.
[01:39:54.480 --> 01:39:58.480]  And they're like, well, you don't have to give it out, but they do it for a credit check.
[01:39:58.480 --> 01:40:03.480]  And then he said, and you're going to have to pay the highest premium.
[01:40:03.480 --> 01:40:04.480]  And I said, well, wait a minute.
[01:40:04.480 --> 01:40:06.480]  I'm not going to make payments.
[01:40:06.480 --> 01:40:08.480]  I'm just going to pay it in full.
[01:40:08.480 --> 01:40:10.480]  So there's no reason for the credit check.
[01:40:10.480 --> 01:40:16.480]  He said it doesn't matter if you don't give the number, you're still going to charge the highest rate.
[01:40:16.480 --> 01:40:26.480]  Now, see, that's actually not, that's discrimination again in a different way.
[01:40:26.480 --> 01:40:27.480]  Right.
[01:40:27.480 --> 01:40:30.480]  How would you go about handling that?
[01:40:30.480 --> 01:40:35.480]  Well, again, you're still talking about a federal lawsuit to correct it.
[01:40:35.480 --> 01:40:36.480]  Okay.
[01:40:36.480 --> 01:40:38.480]  Okay.
[01:40:38.480 --> 01:40:42.480]  Another question on, get under the questions I had lined out.
[01:40:42.480 --> 01:40:51.480]  I was going to ask you about the original bills here for registration for registering vehicles here in Wyoming.
[01:40:51.480 --> 01:40:52.480]  Oh, I'm sorry.
[01:40:52.480 --> 01:40:53.480]  Back at one second.
[01:40:53.480 --> 01:41:02.480]  The Privacy Act of 1974 specifically says that they cannot penalize you in any way for your refusal to disclose a social security number.
[01:41:02.480 --> 01:41:03.480]  Okay.
[01:41:03.480 --> 01:41:05.480]  That includes businesses.
[01:41:05.480 --> 01:41:12.480]  When they're telling you you're going to pay a different rate because you won't give it to them, they're violating the Privacy Act.
[01:41:12.480 --> 01:41:18.480]  The problem is the Privacy Act only applies to certain entities.
[01:41:18.480 --> 01:41:32.480]  So you got to make sure that that entity is someone that, because they're engaged in commerce and if they have a nexus in more than one state, then the Fed could jump in on them for that.
[01:41:32.480 --> 01:41:33.480]  But you got to be sure of that.
[01:41:33.480 --> 01:41:34.480]  Okay.
[01:41:34.480 --> 01:41:36.480]  All right.
[01:41:36.480 --> 01:41:40.480]  So just look that up and read it.
[01:41:40.480 --> 01:41:41.480]  The Privacy Act.
[01:41:41.480 --> 01:41:42.480]  Yeah.
[01:41:42.480 --> 01:41:44.480]  Privacy Act of 1974.
[01:41:44.480 --> 01:41:45.480]  Okay.
[01:41:45.480 --> 01:41:46.480]  I'll check it out.
[01:41:46.480 --> 01:41:48.480]  I appreciate that.
[01:41:48.480 --> 01:41:56.480]  One of my main questions is, a couple of original bills in Wyoming here for registration for vehicles.
[01:41:56.480 --> 01:42:09.480]  I'm in the Secretary of State's office and I know I'd already asked you that before, I studied on the Secretary of State, the only deal with public records, public documents, all the case law says anything filed in a public office deals with a public nature.
[01:42:09.480 --> 01:42:23.480]  So isn't that maybe not direct proof, but isn't that circumstantial proof that, for example, that would only have to apply to those in commerce because that would have to do with the public nature?
[01:42:23.480 --> 01:42:27.480]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:42:27.480 --> 01:42:31.480]  I'm going to ask you the same thing a judge is going to ask you in this case.
[01:42:31.480 --> 01:42:40.480]  How do you equivocate a public record with commerce?
[01:42:40.480 --> 01:42:43.480]  To me, it's just common sense.
[01:42:43.480 --> 01:42:44.480]  No.
[01:42:44.480 --> 01:42:49.480]  No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
[01:42:49.480 --> 01:42:56.480]  How are you going to legally equivocate the existence of a public record with commerce?
[01:42:56.480 --> 01:43:01.480]  Because public and commerce are not the same thing.
[01:43:01.480 --> 01:43:08.480]  So how are you going to equivocate the records in the possession for one purpose as being the equivalent of the other?
[01:43:08.480 --> 01:43:20.480]  I see what you're saying. I do. But isn't anything of a public nature, wouldn't that have to do inherently with a business or some kind of deal with the public?
[01:43:20.480 --> 01:43:21.480]  No.
[01:43:21.480 --> 01:43:29.480]  A private business has no reason to disclose their records to anybody.
[01:43:29.480 --> 01:43:33.480]  And they're in commerce, are they not?
[01:43:33.480 --> 01:43:38.480]  You can't send a foyer to my private business and say, give me all your records dealing with such and such.
[01:43:38.480 --> 01:43:42.480]  I can look at you and go, ha, ha, ha, you're an idiot. No.
[01:43:42.480 --> 01:43:44.480]  Right, right, okay.
[01:43:44.480 --> 01:43:48.480]  All right, well, I have one question to just don't use that argument again.
[01:43:48.480 --> 01:43:51.480]  That would be one way to look at it, yeah.
[01:43:51.480 --> 01:44:00.480]  Hang on just a second, Tyler, and we'll take this up after the break.
[01:44:00.480 --> 01:44:06.480]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.480 --> 01:44:09.480]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:09.480 --> 01:44:11.480]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.480 --> 01:44:17.480]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.480 --> 01:44:25.480]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young jeopardy can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.480 --> 01:44:31.480]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.480 --> 01:44:39.480]  We have come to trust young jeopardy so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.480 --> 01:44:47.480]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.480 --> 01:44:51.480]  As you realize the benefits of young jeopardy, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.480 --> 01:45:00.480]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:00.480 --> 01:45:03.480]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.480 --> 01:45:14.480]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.480 --> 01:45:18.480]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.480 --> 01:45:22.480]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.480 --> 01:45:27.480]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.480 --> 01:45:33.480]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.480 --> 01:45:42.480]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.480 --> 01:45:51.480]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.480 --> 01:45:55.480]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:55.480 --> 01:46:00.480]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.480 --> 01:46:12.480]  All right folks, we are back.
[01:46:12.480 --> 01:46:18.480]  We have entered the last segment of the show, so I'm going to try to knock out this collar board before we get out of time here.
[01:46:18.480 --> 01:46:21.480]  So please bear with me as I get that done.
[01:46:21.480 --> 01:46:24.480]  Okay, let's see, get this done.
[01:46:24.480 --> 01:46:26.480]  Down and we get back to Tyler.
[01:46:26.480 --> 01:46:32.480]  All right, Tyler, really quick, let's see if we can get whatever your issue is dealt with.
[01:46:32.480 --> 01:46:35.480]  Okay, what I was trying to prove is...
[01:46:35.480 --> 01:46:37.480]  Talk in your phone, please.
[01:46:37.480 --> 01:46:49.480]  Okay, on that registration bill, what I was trying to verify, I'm trying to write a comprehensive dismissal, as well as in case we go into court on that injunctive suit you talked about.
[01:46:49.480 --> 01:47:00.480]  But it makes it sound like it's applying to everybody, including their private auto, that you had to file for that application in the Secretary of State's office.
[01:47:00.480 --> 01:47:04.480]  But we know that can't be constitutionally because you have a right to travel.
[01:47:04.480 --> 01:47:15.480]  They can't force you to register your private auto with the Secretary of State to get the tag that likes to play, whatever you want to call it.
[01:47:15.480 --> 01:47:29.480]  So I was making the argument that because it's of a public nature, anything filed in that office, it would have to be some kind of a business or entity that it's a public nature where the public couldn't spend.
[01:47:29.480 --> 01:47:37.480]  No, you're talking about the distinction between a license to do something, okay, which registration isn't.
[01:47:37.480 --> 01:47:42.480]  Registration isn't a license or permission, okay?
[01:47:42.480 --> 01:47:45.480]  Registration is exactly what it says.
[01:47:45.480 --> 01:47:58.480]  It is a means of identifying a piece of property to the state that is to be registered with the state to engage in a particular activity governed by the state.
[01:47:58.480 --> 01:48:00.480]  Got it?
[01:48:00.480 --> 01:48:06.480]  The activity is where their weak point is.
[01:48:06.480 --> 01:48:10.480]  Okay, you follow that?
[01:48:10.480 --> 01:48:16.480]  Okay, right, because the activity would have to be transportation, basically.
[01:48:16.480 --> 01:48:23.480]  The activity would have to be something that government inherently has the power to regulate, all right?
[01:48:23.480 --> 01:48:30.480]  Okay, and then it just identifies the property owner, basically, of what it regulates.
[01:48:30.480 --> 01:48:43.480]  Well, it does more than just identifies. It basically controls and keeps track of. It inventories you and then monitors your whereabouts at all times.
[01:48:43.480 --> 01:48:46.480]  Oh, wow, okay.
[01:48:46.480 --> 01:48:57.480]  So if you're not under that jurisdiction of regulation, then that would be the requirements caused there. You wouldn't have to register.
[01:48:57.480 --> 01:49:06.480]  If you're not engaged in the activity to which those registration laws apply, okay, then no, you wouldn't, would you?
[01:49:06.480 --> 01:49:08.480]  Okay, no.
[01:49:08.480 --> 01:49:16.480]  I don't have to buy a ticket to a Billy Joel concert if I don't like Billy Joel, and I have no intention of going.
[01:49:16.480 --> 01:49:19.480]  Okay, I'm either.
[01:49:19.480 --> 01:49:31.480]  Second question, okay, the Board of Equalization in 19, I think it's 49 is the reason that the Department of Motor Vehicles was vested under the jurisdiction of the Board.
[01:49:31.480 --> 01:49:40.480]  The Board constitutionally only has power over, still does, over carriers, any kind of carrier, it could be railroad, air, it doesn't matter.
[01:49:40.480 --> 01:49:41.480]  Right.
[01:49:41.480 --> 01:49:53.480]  It is one aspect. It is not ironclad. Ironclad is doing the other things I've told you to do 100 times now.
[01:49:53.480 --> 01:50:05.480]  Find the original bill that gave those committees and entities their legal authority and what that legal authority is limited to as far as subject matter.
[01:50:05.480 --> 01:50:07.480]  I can't find it.
[01:50:07.480 --> 01:50:12.480]  Well, you better find it because you don't have an ironclad case without it.
[01:50:12.480 --> 01:50:21.480]  I know, but when I look at the subject matter, it'll say something like licensing and registration, or it'll say...
[01:50:21.480 --> 01:50:31.480]  You're still looking at the statutes, not the bill that created the code or the title within the code as a single act.
[01:50:31.480 --> 01:50:43.480]  Well, I can't find the codified bill that you're talking about, but on all the bills, it just says this is what the title is, registration of motor vehicle or licensing of motor vehicle.
[01:50:43.480 --> 01:50:49.480]  Do you know what the title is for motor vehicles?
[01:50:49.480 --> 01:50:51.480]  What the title is?
[01:50:51.480 --> 01:51:00.480]  Yeah. In the code you're talking about, do you know what title, the motor vehicle laws you're referring to, licensing, registration, all of that, fall under?
[01:51:00.480 --> 01:51:04.480]  Well, are you talking about the number? It's Title 31.
[01:51:04.480 --> 01:51:20.480]  Okay. Then call the Secretary of State's office. Ask them what year and what legislature and what bill that title was enacted under as it exists today. One whole bill.
[01:51:20.480 --> 01:51:26.480]  Yeah, I did that. She couldn't find it, but she gave me a website to go to.
[01:51:26.480 --> 01:51:29.480]  She gave you a website to go to? Which took you where?
[01:51:29.480 --> 01:51:34.480]  The website. I didn't look on it yet.
[01:51:34.480 --> 01:51:38.480]  Then how do you know you can't find it if you haven't even looked on it yet?
[01:51:38.480 --> 01:51:45.480]  Well, true, true. I just used the source of the Supreme Court Library and I haven't found any from the...
[01:51:45.480 --> 01:51:54.480]  What in the hell would the Supreme Court Library have on your state law as far as the original bill goes?
[01:51:54.480 --> 01:52:03.480]  I try to find the bills, but they're all separate bills like you talked about. The only bills that I see that are...
[01:52:03.480 --> 01:52:06.480]  What year are you looking at?
[01:52:06.480 --> 01:52:14.480]  Well, I've gone back. I've tried to look around the 40s. I've tried to look. You said it might be in the 90s.
[01:52:14.480 --> 01:52:26.480]  Oh, dude. Tyler, I'm sorry, man, but there is no way I can get this point across to you and make it stick, it seems. Listen carefully.
[01:52:26.480 --> 01:52:39.480]  In the mid-60s, they created these committees to individualize these individual codes and start compiling them into specific legislative codes or titles.
[01:52:39.480 --> 01:52:49.480]  All the law that did a certain thing under a certain subject was to be collected and put together in a single title or code.
[01:52:49.480 --> 01:52:59.480]  That was in the mid-60s, so it does not surprise me when you're looking at something from the 40s or the teens that it's an individual bill.
[01:52:59.480 --> 01:53:01.480]  That surprised me at all.
[01:53:01.480 --> 01:53:14.480]  I saw that title come about all the way back in what is famous like 53, and it had like six or seven different chapters in it.
[01:53:14.480 --> 01:53:21.480]  But the only original bill is the one I was telling you about, where the division of motor vehicles was created under...
[01:53:21.480 --> 01:53:32.480]  No, there is a recodification bill somewhere to put it under that title. There absolutely is, so that title would not freaking exist.
[01:53:32.480 --> 01:53:39.480]  Okay, I'll keep looking. All right, Eddie, I'll let you get to another call. I appreciate your time.
[01:53:39.480 --> 01:53:41.480]  All right, man.
[01:53:41.480 --> 01:53:42.480]  Have a good one.
[01:53:42.480 --> 01:53:43.480]  You too.
[01:53:43.480 --> 01:53:49.480]  All right, now we have Pat in Texas. Pat, what can we do for you?
[01:53:49.480 --> 01:53:50.480]  Hi, Eddie.
[01:53:50.480 --> 01:53:51.480]  Well, hi, Metta.
[01:53:51.480 --> 01:53:56.480]  Hi. Eddie, I'm going to be real quick. I sent you an email.
[01:53:56.480 --> 01:54:01.480]  Yeah, I saw it. I haven't been able to respond to it in full yet because I'm on the show, but...
[01:54:01.480 --> 01:54:07.480]  Okay, that's all I want to make sure you got it. I didn't know if your computer was not working right.
[01:54:07.480 --> 01:54:15.480]  Well, it's up and down. I'm hoping it doesn't reboot before the end of the show here like it's been doing lately, so I'm trying to remedy all that stuff.
[01:54:15.480 --> 01:54:17.480]  But I haven't been having a whole lot of luck.
[01:54:17.480 --> 01:54:20.480]  Let us know what we can do to help, okay?
[01:54:20.480 --> 01:54:21.480]  All right, thanks.
[01:54:21.480 --> 01:54:23.480]  But as the email... Okay, bye-bye.
[01:54:23.480 --> 01:54:25.480]  All right, bye-bye.
[01:54:25.480 --> 01:54:31.480]  All right, now we have John in New York. John, you have three minutes.
[01:54:31.480 --> 01:54:36.480]  Oh, that's all I need. What is the best? Hi, Eddie, how you doing?
[01:54:36.480 --> 01:54:37.480]  Good.
[01:54:37.480 --> 01:54:48.480]  What's the best effective method for defending yourself against driving without a license?
[01:54:48.480 --> 01:54:54.480]  Well, that depends upon what the criteria of the law surrounding driving without a license is.
[01:54:54.480 --> 01:55:01.480]  The thing about it is whether or not the law they're using actually constitutes an offense.
[01:55:01.480 --> 01:55:09.480]  Most penal laws cannot allege an offense where the law itself does not specifically state what constitutes an offense.
[01:55:09.480 --> 01:55:14.480]  Therefore, here in Texas, for example, you have driving while license invalid.
[01:55:14.480 --> 01:55:21.480]  You don't have a one for not having a license. You have one for driving while license invalid.
[01:55:21.480 --> 01:55:25.480]  You also have one failure to display, okay?
[01:55:25.480 --> 01:55:36.480]  Now, in either case, what must the state prove in order for either of those charges to be able to be made and then proven up at trial?
[01:55:36.480 --> 01:55:42.480]  They must prove that a license was issued, okay?
[01:55:42.480 --> 01:55:44.480]  Okay, that makes sense. That makes sense.
[01:55:44.480 --> 01:55:52.480]  They can't just say, hey, you have an invalid license when they can't prove that you ever had a license to begin with and one was ever issued to begin with.
[01:55:52.480 --> 01:55:58.480]  The same thing with displaying one. How can you display something that doesn't exist?
[01:55:58.480 --> 01:56:03.480]  Ah, okay. If you never got a license, they can't hit you with failure to display it.
[01:56:03.480 --> 01:56:05.480]  Correct.
[01:56:05.480 --> 01:56:14.480]  Okay, so supposing you were issued a license and you didn't renew it and you were driving without it because it wasn't renewed.
[01:56:14.480 --> 01:56:17.480]  Why are you driving without a license?
[01:56:17.480 --> 01:56:18.480]  I'm sorry?
[01:56:18.480 --> 01:56:20.480]  Why are you driving without a license?
[01:56:20.480 --> 01:56:26.480]  Well, whatever the reason is, you forgot to have it renewed.
[01:56:26.480 --> 01:56:31.480]  Okay.
[01:56:31.480 --> 01:56:33.480]  What's the question? Hurry up.
[01:56:33.480 --> 01:56:35.480]  Well, the question is, my original question was...
[01:56:35.480 --> 01:56:41.480]  No, in relation to the example you're trying to come up with, finish it.
[01:56:41.480 --> 01:56:47.480]  All right. You're driving without a license because you failed to renew it. You didn't realize it.
[01:56:47.480 --> 01:56:53.480]  They pulled you over and gave you a citation for it and he said, driving without a license.
[01:56:53.480 --> 01:56:58.480]  Okay, so I asked you, why are you driving?
[01:56:58.480 --> 01:57:04.480]  And you just blew right by that like that doesn't have any connotation whatsoever, but it does.
[01:57:04.480 --> 01:57:06.480]  What is driving?
[01:57:06.480 --> 01:57:10.480]  Oh, all right. You're traveling from one place to another.
[01:57:10.480 --> 01:57:26.480]  Well, what does the statute say about driving without a license? Again, if they can't show that a license was issued and they can't because it wasn't renewed, then how are they going to prove the charge?
[01:57:26.480 --> 01:57:27.480]  Oh, now you're really...
[01:57:27.480 --> 01:57:33.480]  What is the language of the statute in relation to driving without a license?
[01:57:33.480 --> 01:57:40.480]  Does it say someone who has failed to ever acquire one and who is operating a motor vehicle?
[01:57:40.480 --> 01:57:42.480]  Well, then you have the same problem everybody else has.
[01:57:42.480 --> 01:57:48.480]  A motor vehicle only exists in relation to the subject matter of the act itself.
[01:57:48.480 --> 01:57:51.480]  It's not independent of that subject matter.
[01:57:51.480 --> 01:58:00.480]  So what is the subject being regulated when it comes to drivers and registration and motor vehicles?
[01:58:00.480 --> 01:58:08.480]  Here, it's transportation. No transportation, no motor vehicle, no driver, no license requirement. Get it?
[01:58:08.480 --> 01:58:13.480]  So in other words, you're going with the commercial aspect.
[01:58:13.480 --> 01:58:24.480]  I'm going with what the law says the subject is. The fact that the subject itself is commercial is completely out of my control, but it's a fact of law, isn't it?
[01:58:24.480 --> 01:58:26.480]  I guess it is, yeah.
[01:58:26.480 --> 01:58:32.480]  Okay, got nothing to do with what I'm arguing. It has to do with everything about what the law says.
[01:58:32.480 --> 01:58:36.480]  So what do you do when you stand up in court and you're defending yourself?
[01:58:36.480 --> 01:58:40.480]  I don't have time to answer all that, John. I am 10 seconds out of closing.
[01:58:40.480 --> 01:58:57.480]  All right, y'all have a great week. I want to thank you for listening. Y'all have a great one. Good night. God bless.
[01:59:11.480 --> 01:59:20.480]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.480 --> 01:59:29.480]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.480 --> 01:59:32.480]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.480 --> 01:59:40.480]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.480 --> 01:59:59.480]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.