ROL_2018-11-30_16k_Hr3-4.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:06.560] The following news flash is brought to you by The Low Star Lowdown.
[00:06.560 --> 00:13.320] Markets for Wednesday 28th November 2018 Open with Precious Metals Gold $1,213.20 Nounds
[00:13.320 --> 00:17.880] Silver $14.18 Nounds Copper $2.75 Nounds
[00:17.880 --> 00:23.240] Oil Texas Crude $51.56 Barrel Brent Crude $60.21 Barrel
[00:23.240 --> 00:31.160] Cryptos Bitcoin $4,217.98 XRP $0.38 Ethereum $118.92
[00:31.160 --> 00:35.000] Bitcoin Cash $1.90 Crypto Coin
[00:35.000 --> 00:45.160] Today in History The year 1979 Air New Zealand Flight 901, a DC-10 sightseeing flight over
[00:45.160 --> 00:49.720] Antarctica, crashes into Mount Erebus, killing all 257 people on board.
[00:49.720 --> 00:57.420] New Mount Erebus disaster, today in history.
[00:57.420 --> 00:58.420] And recent news.
[00:58.420 --> 01:03.320] 66 acres of land owned by the Catholic Diocese of Brownsville is under notice for survey by
[01:03.320 --> 01:06.440] the federal government for fencing and related infrastructure.
[01:06.440 --> 01:10.960] Home of La Lomita Historic Catholic Mission, the diocese is contesting such plans with
[01:10.960 --> 01:15.920] the Bishop of the Diocese Daniel Flores saying that such actions go against the First Amendment
[01:15.920 --> 01:20.320] and freedom of religion. However, a document filed in the federal court in McAllen last
[01:20.320 --> 01:24.400] week states that the United States needs immediate possession of the subject property
[01:24.400 --> 01:28.320] in order to meet the congressional directive. Brownsville Attorney David Garza rejected
[01:28.320 --> 01:31.840] the filing claims that the government would take possession of the land for a whole year
[01:31.840 --> 01:34.920] in order to survey it for the construction of the border wall.
[01:34.920 --> 01:39.640] And instead it claims that the survey of land would only require one or two days at most
[01:39.640 --> 01:43.080] and not an entire year.
[01:43.080 --> 01:47.160] Next Wednesday, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied a trial court's recommendation
[01:47.160 --> 01:52.200] to relieve Jeff Woods from death row for his involvement in 1996 convenience to a robbery
[01:52.200 --> 01:56.520] which ended with the death of the store clerk. Woods was outside of the getaway car the whole
[01:56.520 --> 02:02.080] time. With unexpected help from Lucy Hale, the prosecutor in Woods' initial trial, even
[02:02.080 --> 02:07.600] writing the Texas Board of Pardons in parole in August of 2017, asking Governor Greg Abbott
[02:07.600 --> 02:12.840] to reduce Woods' sentence to life in prison instead. However, Texas' law of parties,
[02:12.840 --> 02:17.200] a law that states a person who has aided someone else while they commit a capital murder,
[02:17.200 --> 02:25.360] states that such accomplices are also eligible for the death penalty as well.
[02:25.360 --> 02:29.480] White House Texas Police Chief Ed Morris confirmed that Texas Rangers were investigating a shooting
[02:29.480 --> 02:34.400] incident involving an officer at a long-viewed police officer's home in the White House city
[02:34.400 --> 02:40.400] limits the weekend of November 17th. DPS spokeswoman Jean Dara said Rangers were requested to investigate
[02:40.400 --> 02:44.280] an officer involved shooting. No arrests have been made. It's still unknown whether anyone
[02:44.280 --> 02:48.840] was injured nor have any names of anyone involved been released as of yet. Not to mention the
[02:48.840 --> 03:17.960] Smith County Sheriff's Office doesn't have any record of the incident.
[03:17.960 --> 03:25.880] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Real Law Radio on this Friday, the 30th day of November
[03:25.880 --> 03:33.200] 2018. And we're talking to Tina in California. Tina, do we have anything else you need to
[03:33.200 --> 03:34.200] address?
[03:34.200 --> 03:40.040] No, I think we've addressed a lot. I'm about to send you one email. I'm going to send you
[03:40.040 --> 03:45.480] a few follow-ups and I'll let you get to other callers. But please put me in touch with that
[03:45.480 --> 03:50.000] guy in California because I will do anything I can to help him as long as, as well as I
[03:50.000 --> 03:53.480] will with Ted. I've already been in touch with him today.
[03:53.480 --> 03:58.600] Okay, wonderful. Okay, give me that email and I'll get it to them.
[03:58.600 --> 04:01.760] Sounds great. Anyway, have a great evening.
[04:01.760 --> 04:06.160] Okay, bye-bye. And now we're going to Eric in California, Georgia. Hello, Eric.
[04:06.160 --> 04:08.920] Hey, Mr. Randy, how are you doing?
[04:08.920 --> 04:12.040] I'm doing good. What do you have for us today?
[04:12.040 --> 04:19.440] Well, I did those paperwork from the traffic website, like you told me to, and I've been
[04:19.440 --> 04:26.600] revising them for the four or five documents, the motion and lemony, the hearing hearing,
[04:26.600 --> 04:31.160] the preservation of rights, stuff like that. And I found that it looks like the applicable
[04:31.160 --> 04:36.360] law in Georgia for those. So as soon as I get finished writing them back out and making
[04:36.360 --> 04:40.280] it look pretty and everything, what's the work supposed to be, I'm going to send it
[04:40.280 --> 04:46.280] to you and let you look at it if you would for me to make sure it ain't screwing up.
[04:46.280 --> 04:52.800] Wonderful. And I'll take those and load them up. Now, I have the site set up so you can
[04:52.800 --> 04:59.040] tell it what state. And if you tell it Georgia, it'll pull all of these documents instead
[04:59.040 --> 05:00.560] of my Texas documents.
[05:00.560 --> 05:05.080] I can for that. That'd be great. And I've been, well, I need you to check and make sure
[05:05.080 --> 05:11.320] I got them right. And I got them pretty close. I think there was a, I got about all the cases
[05:11.320 --> 05:15.720] I did. I couldn't find out Georgia because all of us versus state and got there. But
[05:15.720 --> 05:20.320] I finally narrowed it down and found it or found reference in Texas law. And then cross
[05:20.320 --> 05:23.880] references with Google scholar and found it in Georgia.
[05:23.880 --> 05:26.560] Wait, wait, I'm having a little trouble understanding here.
[05:26.560 --> 05:29.560] Don't you hear me now?
[05:29.560 --> 05:35.840] Hey, you're still pretty light. It sounds like you're in the truck again on the side
[05:35.840 --> 05:36.840] of the highway.
[05:36.840 --> 05:41.160] I actually am. I'm writing an interview for right now. I just got off work. I'm sorry.
[05:41.160 --> 05:45.000] But I just wanted to tell you that I'm going to send that to you. And everything, I found
[05:45.000 --> 05:50.080] all the case law and everything. And I'm going to send it to you and send it back to me if
[05:50.080 --> 05:53.280] you've got any edits or anything before I load it. I just want to make sure it's correct
[05:53.280 --> 05:54.280] before I load it.
[05:54.280 --> 06:02.720] Well, good. Send it to me. I'll go through it. And then I'll go in and lay in all of
[06:02.720 --> 06:09.440] my control codes so that you can go to the traffic site, select Georgia, and it'll drop
[06:09.440 --> 06:10.920] you down Georgia documents.
[06:10.920 --> 06:15.160] All right. Thank you very much, sir. And you have a great night.
[06:15.160 --> 06:22.920] Okay. Thank you very much, Eric. Okay. Do you have anything else for us? I mean, I'm
[06:22.920 --> 06:29.760] not... No, I didn't know that. That's everything I got for you. If I have any more, you know,
[06:29.760 --> 06:33.080] it's fine. You're on the radio show if you need any, you know, a couple of calls.
[06:33.080 --> 06:38.160] Okay. Okay. Thank you, Eric. Okay. Now we're going to Scott in Michigan. Hello, Scott.
[06:38.160 --> 06:40.120] Hey, Randy. How's it going?
[06:40.120 --> 06:43.240] Going good. What do you have for us today?
[06:43.240 --> 06:49.520] Well, last you heard from me, I told you that I went to court and law. But I've had some
[06:49.520 --> 06:54.640] more time to think back on that and things aren't looking so bad anymore.
[06:54.640 --> 06:58.520] Okay. Was this traffic?
[06:58.520 --> 06:59.520] It was, yep.
[06:59.520 --> 07:03.640] Okay. I thought so. Okay. So, how are they looking now?
[07:03.640 --> 07:08.880] It's been a long time. Well, in hindsight, the more I thought about it, you know, I
[07:08.880 --> 07:13.120] walked out feeling bad, like you always say, you know, they try to get you feeling crummy
[07:13.120 --> 07:16.800] and feeling like defeated and all that stuff. And I was definitely feeling that the last
[07:16.800 --> 07:22.560] time I talked to you, but when I called the clerk back a couple weeks later to request
[07:22.560 --> 07:28.240] transcripts, I got to thinking to myself, boy, now that I think about it, the reason
[07:28.240 --> 07:32.800] I'm having to call back for these transcripts is because they all ran, the judge ran off
[07:32.800 --> 07:36.560] the bench and the prosecutor left the room with the cop. I mean, they all, they all scattered
[07:36.560 --> 07:43.760] like roaches as soon as he banged the gavel. And I realized that even though I lost, I
[07:43.760 --> 07:48.280] had him running scared. Exactly. And they wanted out of there.
[07:48.280 --> 07:53.560] Well, I mean, it's been, you know, a couple months now, and I haven't heard a word about
[07:53.560 --> 07:59.600] this. So I'm pretty sure they put it in that we don't know what to do with this guy filed.
[07:59.600 --> 08:05.960] So this, was this a pre-trial hearing or is this the, no, this was a formal, formal hearing.
[08:05.960 --> 08:09.160] Did you file a notice of appeal?
[08:09.160 --> 08:14.400] I did not. Oh, I didn't have to.
[08:14.400 --> 08:18.440] Then you probably won't hear anything else from him. Have you filed any actions against
[08:18.440 --> 08:25.440] the prosecutor and the judge? No, but the last phone call I made was to
[08:25.440 --> 08:30.640] the clerk to ask for the transcript transcript. And I told her that I would need 13 certified
[08:30.640 --> 08:37.400] copies. She said, why 13 copies? And I said, well, 12 certified copies need to go to the
[08:37.400 --> 08:44.600] grand jury. So I kind of broke that don't give them fair warning rule, but it worked.
[08:44.600 --> 08:54.360] Yeah, but sometimes you just got to. Yeah, it was the right thing at the right time.
[08:54.360 --> 09:01.760] So have you filed with the grand jury yet? I don't think I'll have to bother with it.
[09:01.760 --> 09:09.560] You're saying that there have, what were they going to, what was the outcome of the trial?
[09:09.560 --> 09:17.120] Well, I was guilty of, you know, no registration, no insurance or whatever it was. But as I
[09:17.120 --> 09:21.520] mentioned to you on the phone, you know, that during the course of the hearing, I managed
[09:21.520 --> 09:27.200] to get the cop to purge her himself. And I kind of made a big deal out of that. I turned
[09:27.200 --> 09:32.480] around and I said, Bailiff, are you kidding this? You know, it's just like how would these
[09:32.480 --> 09:37.080] used to be my witness to see this criminal action that's going on here in the courtroom?
[09:37.080 --> 09:44.400] Okay, did they assess you a fine? Yeah, but I mean, they haven't sent me a bill for it.
[09:44.400 --> 09:48.800] I mean, you know, they won't send you, they probably won't. They'll just wait and issue
[09:48.800 --> 09:53.240] a warrant. I don't think so.
[09:53.240 --> 10:01.480] I would hope not. But if you didn't appeal it, almost certainly, they'll wait six months
[10:01.480 --> 10:05.400] to a year and then you'll get pulled over and you'll have a warrant out for you.
[10:05.400 --> 10:07.120] You think?
[10:07.120 --> 10:08.120] I think so.
[10:08.120 --> 10:11.680] Well, I should keep driving them hard, then.
[10:11.680 --> 10:16.160] Yeah, you should, you should go back and check.
[10:16.160 --> 10:21.960] The tricky part is that there isn't always a grand jury in Michigan. They only impanel
[10:21.960 --> 10:27.400] a grand jury, like the impanel of grand jury in Detroit, if there's a corruption issue,
[10:27.400 --> 10:31.080] and so then there's a grand jury in panel, you know, and something I heard you say is
[10:31.080 --> 10:35.320] that grand juries are, I mean, they're universal. If there's one in your state, you can take
[10:35.320 --> 10:37.280] anything to it, so to speak.
[10:37.280 --> 10:43.680] Okay, well, it's due process and due process is also federal.
[10:43.680 --> 10:44.920] Okay.
[10:44.920 --> 10:53.920] So, you can file against them there for denying you due process or you can strengthen your
[10:53.920 --> 11:03.960] position by filing with the prosecuting attorney and get the prosecuting attorney to refuse
[11:03.960 --> 11:10.400] to prosecute, then file against the prosecuting attorney for shielding from prosecution with
[11:10.400 --> 11:15.600] a district judge, get a district judge to refuse to act and then go to the feds with
[11:15.600 --> 11:17.600] all of them.
[11:17.600 --> 11:20.200] Sure.
[11:20.200 --> 11:25.480] Then you file it with the FBI agent who will refuse to do anything. Then you file against
[11:25.480 --> 11:33.120] the FBI agent with the federal grand jury and the prosecuting attorney will intercept
[11:33.120 --> 11:40.480] it and then you file against the prosecuting attorney with the grand jury and he'll intercept
[11:40.480 --> 11:48.520] that. Then you file against the U.S. attorney with the U.S. attorney, I mean, with the local
[11:48.520 --> 11:52.040] U.S. attorney with the attorney general in D.C.
[11:52.040 --> 12:00.280] It's a lot of fun and you'll really get everybody's attention, but since you didn't
[12:00.280 --> 12:06.760] file an appeal, you kind of lost your standing to go after them very well other than the
[12:06.760 --> 12:09.760] criminal side.
[12:09.760 --> 12:13.600] Well I can still send bar grievances, I can still do judicial conduct complaints, I can
[12:13.600 --> 12:19.080] still file charges against the judge and the secretary for impersonating him.
[12:19.080 --> 12:24.560] And you can wind up with this little red line across your records when the cop pulls it
[12:24.560 --> 12:29.600] up that says, do not detain.
[12:29.600 --> 12:36.600] I want to get a license plate that says that D-N-D-T-A-I-N, do not detain.
[12:36.600 --> 12:47.120] Well that, you're likely to get that. I just got a speeding ticket in Tennessee today,
[12:47.120 --> 12:54.760] so I will get to check out the criminal justice system in Tennessee. And here, most states
[12:54.760 --> 12:59.920] you go before a justice of the peace, if it's highway patrol, here I go before the general
[12:59.920 --> 13:01.920] sessions court.
[13:01.920 --> 13:05.880] Oh, this is like a county judge.
[13:05.880 --> 13:06.880] Okay.
[13:06.880 --> 13:17.120] And I'll get to step right in the middle of him, and this is a real small county, everybody
[13:17.120 --> 13:20.120] knows everybody.
[13:20.120 --> 13:24.880] So it should get real interesting when I step in the middle of this judge, when I go to
[13:24.880 --> 13:34.960] appear on the date and refuse to inter-appliate and demand that they hold an examining trial.
[13:34.960 --> 13:40.880] And when the judge refuses, then I ask the bailiff to arrest the judge, it should get
[13:40.880 --> 13:42.360] really interesting.
[13:42.360 --> 13:44.360] Right on.
[13:44.360 --> 13:52.160] So I'll get to test out how the system works in Tennessee. We had Olivier in Tennessee,
[13:52.160 --> 14:02.760] but he had created a real mess for himself before he got into a place to defend himself.
[14:02.760 --> 14:07.600] Mine is only a single traffic ticket, so I'm in good shape.
[14:07.600 --> 14:12.080] Right, but I get a lot of the listening to those shows with Olivier. The back episodes
[14:12.080 --> 14:15.160] that he called in, I always get something out of those.
[14:15.160 --> 14:21.560] Yes, so I will take all of his research. He's in Florida now. And I've only heard from
[14:21.560 --> 14:22.560] him once since then.
[14:22.560 --> 14:28.120] And I'm not surprised. That's a lot of trauma. And once you're out of it, you don't want
[14:28.120 --> 14:30.400] to touch it again.
[14:30.400 --> 14:36.840] But I've got his research, and I was hoping I would get my first ticket by a sheriff's
[14:36.840 --> 14:43.280] deputy because that had been easier to fight, but I got it by a state trooper. So I go after
[14:43.280 --> 14:53.720] the issue of the fact that in Tennessee, they can require you to have a commercial license.
[14:53.720 --> 15:04.680] But for the limited purpose of ensuring competency and knowledge of the traffic laws, but it
[15:04.680 --> 15:18.280] does not create the automatic perception that you are in commerce.
[15:18.280 --> 15:25.760] Just because you have a commercial license doesn't mean that you're using it at the time.
[15:25.760 --> 15:28.840] So that's the argument I'll bring to him.
[15:28.840 --> 15:36.440] And what will really happen is it will go to an argument of due process because I will
[15:36.440 --> 15:43.520] file the complaint. The prosecutor won't bother to respond to them. And then I'll move for
[15:43.520 --> 15:49.840] some re-judgment because there are no facts at issue. The judge will deny it. Then I file
[15:49.840 --> 15:55.560] against the prosecutor and the judge and we just start cranking them up. But I get to
[15:55.560 --> 16:00.080] walk them up the system without them having a way to come back at me.
[16:00.080 --> 16:05.840] So I said, it'd be interesting. It sounds like it.
[16:05.840 --> 16:11.800] And in the process, I should get a set of documents made up for Tennessee for my traffic
[16:11.800 --> 16:12.800] site.
[16:12.800 --> 16:20.720] Okay, hang on. We're about to go to break. This is Randy Kelton. We have a lot of radio.
[16:20.720 --> 16:26.600] Our call in number 512-646-1984. We've got room on the call board. So if you have a question
[16:26.600 --> 16:29.480] or a comment, give us a call.
[16:29.480 --> 16:35.840] And we do have our fundraiser going. If you listen to this program and you find value
[16:35.840 --> 16:42.880] from it, go to the Logos Radio Network and check out our gun giveaway and the products
[16:42.880 --> 16:47.960] we sell there. They're valuable products of their own right and they also help to support
[16:47.960 --> 16:52.960] the station. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[16:52.960 --> 17:10.360] It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[17:10.360 --> 17:17.600] Gun Works. Go to LogosRadionetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance
[17:17.600 --> 17:23.840] to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical
[17:23.840 --> 17:30.720] AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[17:30.720 --> 17:37.040] Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10
[17:37.040 --> 17:43.680] chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the
[17:43.680 --> 17:49.360] shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality
[17:49.360 --> 17:55.440] programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Go to
[17:55.440 --> 18:00.720] LogosRadionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.720 --> 18:06.080] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses? Stop
[18:06.080 --> 18:10.800] debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method. Michael Mearris has won six
[18:10.800 --> 18:15.680] cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step by
[18:15.680 --> 18:21.040] step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[18:21.040 --> 18:26.800] What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons. How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.800 --> 18:31.360] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial tables on them
[18:31.360 --> 18:37.360] and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how
[18:37.360 --> 18:42.400] to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[18:42.400 --> 18:48.000] please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email Michael
[18:48.000 --> 18:57.520] Mearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.520 --> 19:08.400] To learn how to stop debt collectors next, you are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:12.560 --> 19:16.800] Well, don't let nothing get to you. Only the father can deliver you.
[19:16.800 --> 19:28.080] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton of Ruleoflaw Radio on this Friday, the 30th day of November
[19:28.080 --> 19:34.880] 2018 and we're talking to Scott in Michigan. And Scott, I'm hoping, do you know anybody in
[19:34.880 --> 19:41.440] Michigan who's a good legal researcher? A good legal researcher? Yes. I fancy myself to be an
[19:41.440 --> 19:48.480] aspiring good legal researcher. Well, what I'm doing is, did you hear the first part of the show?
[19:50.320 --> 19:57.920] Bits and pieces, yes. Okay. I'm building this product, this tool,
[19:59.360 --> 20:06.880] and I can hire all the lawyers I need. We're in the process of petitioning for a million dollars
[20:06.880 --> 20:13.120] in seed funding, in angel funding. And we have a very, very large project,
[20:14.160 --> 20:24.800] a project of five-year profit of 2.2 billion. This is a big project and it's big because
[20:25.520 --> 20:32.000] the United States is big. 325 million people, a million lawyers.
[20:32.000 --> 20:41.040] You have to look at the whole world to understand how outrageous that is. There's about
[20:41.680 --> 20:50.000] a quarter of a million lawyers in the rest of the world. Wow. And a million in the United States.
[20:50.000 --> 20:54.560] That is absurd. But we got them. Every 400 people.
[20:54.560 --> 21:07.120] Yeah. So they need a lot of work. And the United States is, by far, the worst police
[21:07.120 --> 21:17.840] state the world has ever seen. Oh, yeah. We contain approximately 3% of the world's population.
[21:17.840 --> 21:27.040] We have approximately 50% of the world's population of inmates. This is the worst police
[21:27.040 --> 21:34.080] state the world's ever seen. For the most part, nobody knows. So the majority of the population
[21:34.080 --> 21:38.960] never have anything to do with government. And we hear stories about how horrible these governments
[21:38.960 --> 21:49.280] are with these horrible, mean dictators. But for the most part, the people have very little to do
[21:49.280 --> 21:58.960] with this, with the government. I had a friend. She had been a captain in the KGB. And she said,
[21:58.960 --> 22:06.560] in the totalitarian government, the courts are far more fair and considerate of people
[22:06.560 --> 22:13.600] than they are here in the United States. Because the totalitarian government realizes,
[22:14.240 --> 22:18.320] you get the people upset at you, and they will rise up and throw you out.
[22:19.600 --> 22:26.800] They were very cognizant of that. And she was KGB Russia. And she understood that. That was
[22:26.800 --> 22:33.680] something sharp in her attention. That you got to take care of the public. You take care of the
[22:33.680 --> 22:41.440] public. You can stay in power. Well, most of the people there never had anything to do with it,
[22:42.320 --> 22:49.440] with the legal systems. And when they did, the government understood that you have to give people
[22:49.440 --> 22:57.680] the impression that their government will protect them. Our government has lost that completely.
[22:57.680 --> 23:10.880] And we want to fix it. And when I started this 10, 12 years ago, I started it because I read
[23:10.880 --> 23:14.960] the penal code and the code of criminal procedure after spending the night in jail for driving on
[23:14.960 --> 23:22.080] the headlight out. I disappear off the planet overnight. My family has no idea where I'm at.
[23:22.080 --> 23:29.440] And I spend the night sleeping on a drunk-take floor because I had a filament in a headlight
[23:29.440 --> 23:38.400] go out. That did not seem right. So when I got out, I got out the penal code and the code of
[23:38.400 --> 23:43.520] criminal procedure. Oh, one other thing. They, when they send you in to change in the little jail
[23:43.520 --> 23:49.520] outfit, they're spraying disinfectant all over. It turned out the guy in front of me in that room
[23:49.520 --> 23:57.040] had full blown aids. So I was exposed to that because the filament went out in a light bulb.
[23:59.600 --> 24:03.200] So I get out. I got the penal code and the code of criminal procedure and read them.
[24:04.240 --> 24:10.400] I looked at the practice and I thought, have I stepped through the looking glass?
[24:10.400 --> 24:20.960] How can the practice be so dramatically different than the code? And I'm an engineer.
[24:20.960 --> 24:29.440] And that was a conundrum because when I read statutes, I feel like I'm reading a tech manual.
[24:31.600 --> 24:38.640] I read it as a tech manual. This is a specification, but they weren't following the
[24:38.640 --> 24:49.600] specification. What's the deal? And it took 15 years to figure out that when I read the code
[24:49.600 --> 24:58.800] the first time, I didn't miss anything. The code said exactly what it said. And they were in fact
[24:58.800 --> 25:03.440] doing it wrong. I sat down with a justice of the peace who was a personal friend of mine.
[25:03.440 --> 25:11.520] And I respected him highly. It was my opinion that Mark Autry would do what he thought was right
[25:11.520 --> 25:16.160] if it harrowed up the pope. But then that wouldn't bother him too much because he was a Baptist
[25:16.160 --> 25:21.680] preacher as well. But he really had a sense of what was right. And I sat down with him when
[25:21.680 --> 25:27.600] he was justice of the peace and walked through the code and then demonstrated the practice.
[25:27.600 --> 25:31.600] And he said, Mr. Kelkin, I've been a police officer for 20 years. He was a captain on the
[25:31.600 --> 25:37.120] sheriff's department. And then he was a judge for another 10 or 12 years. Are you telling me
[25:38.000 --> 25:44.640] that everything that I did for the 20 years as a police officer and as a judge and everything
[25:44.640 --> 25:51.200] everybody else is doing in Texas is wrong and you're right? He said, don't ask me, Mark,
[25:52.000 --> 25:58.480] read the code. I didn't write it. I just read it. This is what it says in very clear black
[25:58.480 --> 26:06.720] letter of law. He could not wrap his head around the fact that everybody's doing everything wrong.
[26:08.400 --> 26:16.240] He had to believe that I was missing something. At some point where hidden in the background,
[26:16.240 --> 26:21.920] there was something that supported what he was doing. And I started out with that perception.
[26:21.920 --> 26:27.920] And it took a long time to realize, no, no, no, this, this is really wrong. Everything is wrong.
[26:29.680 --> 26:38.880] I called the chief of police in Austin, Texas, Asaveto. He was trying to get authorization
[26:38.880 --> 26:43.360] from the city council for his officers to take blood on the side of the highway.
[26:44.800 --> 26:50.560] And even his officers weren't happy about that. That's incredible risk. So I called him
[26:50.560 --> 26:54.960] with a mic when he was coming in the door. We did a live show from there
[26:56.400 --> 27:01.200] and asked him why he needed his officers to have that authority. He said, well,
[27:01.200 --> 27:06.480] so he get a higher conviction rate. I said, well, that's interesting. So what's your conviction
[27:06.480 --> 27:12.960] rate now? I said, well, I don't know. I said, how about a guess? He said, well, 70, 80%. Oh, no,
[27:12.960 --> 27:24.880] a lot higher than that. Well, I'm not sure how high we'll try and maybe 90, maybe 95, 97, 99.6%.
[27:26.480 --> 27:30.560] He said, no, no, I have my statistician here. And he called this guy over
[27:31.440 --> 27:37.040] and asked him and the guy hemmed and hard and shuffled his feet and looked at the ground.
[27:37.040 --> 27:47.280] I finally got him to admit 99.6. If you live in the United States of America and you get accused
[27:47.280 --> 27:58.000] of a crime, you are going to take a deal because every step from arrest to trial has been carefully
[27:58.000 --> 28:05.280] crafted so as to put you in a position to where you have no reasonable option but to take a deal.
[28:05.280 --> 28:11.760] This is the worst police state the world has ever seen. And I think we can fix it.
[28:13.920 --> 28:21.280] I didn't didn't really think we could when I started. But as this tool came together,
[28:22.960 --> 28:25.760] I think we can fix it. And I think we can fix it quickly.
[28:27.760 --> 28:32.080] Consider happy to help you. I'm happy to help you help them critique their own process.
[28:32.080 --> 28:37.280] Well, if you can help, this is what I'm looking for. We can't get a lawyer to do this.
[28:38.800 --> 28:45.680] A lawyer lives in a lawyer box. And there are things he cannot do. There are places he can't
[28:45.680 --> 28:51.120] go. There are things he can't even think about. So when I try to talk to a lawyer, I get nowhere.
[28:52.800 --> 28:58.800] I'm amazed at how limited lawyers understanding of the law is.
[28:58.800 --> 29:08.240] I think I've kind of figured out how it got this way. And it's not the way you would expect.
[29:11.200 --> 29:20.000] It takes a while and these realizations come to you that things are not the way you think they are.
[29:21.200 --> 29:26.640] I think we got this way because of technology. And I'm about to go to break. I'll explain
[29:26.640 --> 29:32.160] what I mean by that. Lexus, Nexus, and Westlaw is what created this mess.
[29:33.200 --> 29:36.480] And I'll explain why when we come back on the other side. This is Randy Kelton,
[29:36.480 --> 29:56.480] Root of Law Radio, our call in number 512-646-1984. I'm a little bit ahead of myself, but we'll be right back.
[30:06.480 --> 30:10.480] After all, I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you more in just a moment.
[30:36.480 --> 30:47.200] Think twice before blaming yourself or someone else for being overweight. A new study suggests a
[30:47.200 --> 30:52.000] common childhood virus could be the culprit. Researchers found that children exposed to
[30:52.000 --> 30:57.840] adenovirus 36, an infection that causes short-term gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms,
[30:57.840 --> 31:02.720] weighed an average of 52 pounds more than children who were never infected. Researchers
[31:02.720 --> 31:07.280] believe this fat virus increases the body's fat cells and makes it harder for the body to
[31:07.280 --> 31:12.320] break down mature fat cells later. The result is that people affected by the virus store more
[31:12.320 --> 31:17.920] fat overall. So go easy on the next overweight person you see. Diet and exercise may not work
[31:17.920 --> 31:23.200] as well for them as they do for you. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at
[31:23.200 --> 31:35.120] KatherineAlbrecht.com. Did you know there are 3 million edible food plants on earth and none
[31:35.120 --> 31:40.400] have the nutritional value of the hemp plant? Hempusa.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:40.400 --> 31:46.480] It does not contain chemicals or THC. It's non-GMO and is 100% gluten free. Hemp protein
[31:46.480 --> 31:52.480] powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein and feeds the body the nutrients it needs.
[31:52.480 --> 32:00.880] Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at Hempusa.org.
[32:02.880 --> 32:07.360] Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America we live in
[32:07.360 --> 32:11.120] an us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're
[32:11.120 --> 32:15.520] going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely
[32:15.520 --> 32:19.200] from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right
[32:19.200 --> 32:23.920] to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to
[32:23.920 --> 32:28.080] enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in
[32:28.080 --> 32:31.920] conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.920 --> 32:36.160] that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.160 --> 32:40.320] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:40.320 --> 32:44.560] ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation
[32:44.560 --> 32:49.440] Code. The law versus the lie. Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research
[32:49.440 --> 32:53.120] documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help
[32:53.120 --> 32:57.680] of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the
[32:57.680 --> 33:16.160] free society we all want and deserve. Live free speech radio logosradionetwork.com
[33:16.160 --> 33:29.120] okay we are back Randy Kelton rule of law radio and we're talking to Scott in Michigan
[33:31.120 --> 33:34.800] at the time of the Magna Carta 1216 AD
[33:34.800 --> 33:44.960] that entered in our current legal system that initiated it and at the time you go to
[33:45.680 --> 33:50.800] the trial and they had a scribe there who would take down what went on in the trial
[33:51.600 --> 33:59.360] and they would list keywords to address the issues that were brought before the court
[33:59.360 --> 34:07.040] and then they printed out legal encyclopedias that listed all of these keywords and they
[34:07.040 --> 34:17.040] would list a representative set of cases that went to and addressed these issues. So up until the
[34:17.040 --> 34:25.520] mid-70s a lawyer would go to the legal library and he got all these books everywhere but first
[34:25.520 --> 34:32.720] he would go to a legal encyclopedia and look up a keyword that went to his cases and that
[34:33.360 --> 34:40.720] keyword would give him a list of relatively standard controlling cases on issue. So it narrowed down
[34:40.720 --> 34:48.560] the field of what he had to look at to just a few cases. Well in the mid-70s Westlaw came along
[34:48.560 --> 34:57.120] with this great idea. They came up with this tool so that instead of you being limited to the
[34:57.120 --> 35:03.520] legal encyclopedias there were two or three of them that you were limited to the cases you could
[35:03.520 --> 35:12.160] find in there you can use this tool to search the entire database. So now instead of having
[35:12.160 --> 35:19.200] 10 or 15 controlling cases that everybody used on a particular issue now you can search the
[35:19.200 --> 35:28.400] entire database and come up with 10,000 cases. All of a sudden lawyers they got hundreds and
[35:28.400 --> 35:36.640] hundreds of cases. I was talking to the second in command of the North Carolina State Bar Association
[35:36.640 --> 35:45.360] and asked her generally how many cases do you have to go through in order to find that first
[35:45.360 --> 35:52.880] case on point and she said between 50 and 100. Now they don't read the whole case but they have
[35:52.880 --> 35:59.200] to open up the case and go in it and look at the highlighted issues based on the keyword they used
[35:59.200 --> 36:08.400] and see if this actually goes to their issue. Then I asked have you ever written a motion
[36:09.120 --> 36:18.160] pleading brief treatise that you filed in court and were confident that the lawyer on the other
[36:18.160 --> 36:23.360] side didn't find something you had missed that's going to come into court and wipe the floor with
[36:23.360 --> 36:32.800] you. She said what every other lawyer said never. This is the lawyer's greatest terror.
[36:34.480 --> 36:44.080] Now we have no fixed set of controlling cases. Now every time we get a new issue we have to go to
[36:44.080 --> 36:55.920] the entire database and try to figure out a string of letters that amount to a phrase that would appear
[36:55.920 --> 37:05.520] in a case that went to this specific issue. Good luck with that. You run a search first one if
[37:05.520 --> 37:11.680] you're lucky you'll only get 10,000 hits. Then you go through a few of those and you kind of
[37:11.680 --> 37:17.760] begin to figure out which part of the phrase works which part doesn't and you try a new phrase
[37:18.320 --> 37:26.800] and keep trying to shrink it down. Most of the time when I do that I never find a case that's
[37:26.800 --> 37:33.600] really on point. What I do is find one that's kind of closer in the general area then I go
[37:33.600 --> 37:40.480] through that case. You look in the case and the case will tell you the points around the
[37:40.480 --> 37:46.480] point they're addressing. We've got a point here that hasn't been addressed but on this side we've
[37:46.480 --> 37:51.120] addressed this this and this and on the other side we've addressed this this and this. Now here we
[37:51.120 --> 37:57.680] are in the middle with the one we have an address so I use those peripheral cases to try to move me
[37:57.680 --> 38:06.400] toward my first case on point but it's a beast and lawyers in the mid-70s you could find just
[38:06.400 --> 38:13.120] general practice lawyers they practice general law and they could pretty well work in any area
[38:13.120 --> 38:21.600] but after Westlaw came along and then Lexus behind them you couldn't do that anymore because the
[38:21.600 --> 38:33.200] biggest fear a lawyer has is missing something and with the new search engines there is so
[38:33.200 --> 38:38.720] much information out there you can't know all of it you can't get a general set of cases
[38:40.000 --> 38:49.600] for different areas of practice so all the lawyers started shrinking their practice areas down into
[38:49.600 --> 38:56.880] very focused areas this way they didn't have to do that dreaded research because they know there's
[38:56.880 --> 39:04.480] no way they're going to find everything. So I put together this questionnaire and primarily I put
[39:04.480 --> 39:13.360] the questionnaire together as a way to mine through the codes. Yes, take someone who knows
[39:13.360 --> 39:21.920] nothing about a particular set of code. How do you know where to start? You have no idea of
[39:21.920 --> 39:28.160] what to look for. Everything you need is there somewhere but you have no idea how to find it.
[39:29.200 --> 39:39.280] So we looked at how does a lawyer figure out a case? Well they set their client down and they start
[39:39.280 --> 39:48.320] asking their clients questions. This is simply 20 questions on steroids. You walk into the legal
[39:48.320 --> 39:55.680] library. I have a photograph of the Ohio State Legal Library. It's a six-story building. It's
[39:55.680 --> 40:02.080] it's an end of a building and it's six stories with a foyer in the middle that goes ceiling to floor.
[40:02.080 --> 40:10.000] Six stories straight up and on each side there are each floor is lined with shelves of books
[40:10.000 --> 40:20.400] and this photo is taken from about the third story and this library looks absolutely massive.
[40:21.920 --> 40:33.200] So you walk into this library and there's six stories, two walls of lines and books everywhere.
[40:33.200 --> 40:41.680] Where do you start? Well the first question is, is your issue civil or criminal?
[40:42.720 --> 40:49.360] You just cut that library in half. Now you don't have to look on one side. Of the criminal
[40:50.880 --> 40:57.600] there's about 200 little over 200 penal statutes. What were you charged with?
[40:57.600 --> 41:04.720] Now I've knocked it down by a factor of 201. Now I've only got a couple of
[41:04.720 --> 41:10.880] shelves in this whole thing that I have to look at and then I take that statute and it has a set
[41:10.880 --> 41:17.440] of elements and I walk down asking for each one of those elements and then there's some issues
[41:17.440 --> 41:21.120] related to the elements and then there are points related to those issues.
[41:21.120 --> 41:30.720] So we start out by building the track through the codes. We build a basic core questionnaire
[41:30.720 --> 41:34.400] that goes to all the different elements and then we start looking at the case law.
[41:35.680 --> 41:40.960] The variations on each of these elements and where we find a variation we go into the questionnaire,
[41:40.960 --> 41:45.840] we crack it open, we stick a question in there that goes to this particular element
[41:45.840 --> 41:51.840] for this issue and we stick the questionnaire back together. Well it will ask you a question,
[41:51.840 --> 41:56.080] yes or no. If you say yes it goes to this issue. If it says no it just keeps going.
[41:56.800 --> 42:04.480] So no matter how much we've got in there, you only see that part that you say yes to.
[42:05.760 --> 42:10.160] Only that part that applies to your issue and you don't care about the rest.
[42:10.160 --> 42:17.520] Well that works really good. It allows you to walk right through all of this massive law library
[42:18.080 --> 42:23.840] and you don't care about all that garbage in there. It will take you only to that information you
[42:23.840 --> 42:32.320] need. Well when we got it done and the technology it took to do that, we use a mind mapping tool
[42:32.320 --> 42:41.200] and these maps this thing created were massive. I don't have a computer that will open it.
[42:41.200 --> 42:44.960] I can't put it all together and open it. I don't think there exists. There may
[42:46.640 --> 42:52.480] possibly a Cray or some really large computer might be able to open this thing. I have a
[42:52.480 --> 42:59.200] four gig processor on this machine, 32 gigabytes of RAM memory and it takes 20 minutes to open it.
[42:59.200 --> 43:06.240] That's because this is an eight processor but the programs won't multi-thread.
[43:07.280 --> 43:12.640] So it takes 20 minutes to open it. If I click on something it takes five minutes to make one
[43:12.640 --> 43:21.760] mouse click. That is massive but nobody cares about all that because you only see that part
[43:21.760 --> 43:32.880] in amounts that matters to you. However when a lawyer gets the case the most difficult part
[43:32.880 --> 43:43.360] of the case is the first case on point. Well with this questionnaire we got all the points.
[43:45.040 --> 43:51.280] We got mapped out. Right. So now right now what we're doing now is we're talking to some AI
[43:51.280 --> 43:57.680] companies and I'm trying to work up an AI classifier. First thing I want to tell the classifier to do
[43:57.680 --> 44:04.160] is go to the end. At Capital Coin and Bullion our mission is to be your preferred shopping
[44:04.160 --> 44:08.960] destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:08.960 --> 44:13.440] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins
[44:13.440 --> 44:18.000] and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for
[44:18.000 --> 44:23.280] investors. We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers
[44:23.280 --> 44:28.320] and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking for we can find it. In addition we carry
[44:28.320 --> 44:33.120] popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst. We also offer
[44:33.120 --> 44:37.920] one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10 percent
[44:37.920 --> 44:43.200] above wholesale and more. We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept big coins as payment.
[44:43.200 --> 44:50.560] Call us at 512-646-644-0. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Sweet A, about a half mile south
[44:50.560 --> 44:56.560] of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com
[44:56.560 --> 45:05.200] or call 512-646-644-0. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without
[45:05.200 --> 45:11.680] an attorney with jurisdictionary. The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show
[45:11.680 --> 45:19.200] you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.200 --> 45:24.800] If you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step
[45:24.800 --> 45:32.240] by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years
[45:32.240 --> 45:38.240] of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.240 --> 45:44.000] understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[45:44.000 --> 45:52.320] our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more.
[45:52.320 --> 46:08.400] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:23.040 --> 46:33.840] Yeah, always I must be careful what I'm wishing for. When I'm hungry I like to know just what I'm
[46:33.840 --> 46:43.200] wishing for. I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton. I'm just here making my
[46:43.200 --> 46:52.720] living pushing buttons. I get my message I do when you're wanting to shout in distance.
[46:52.720 --> 47:01.360] I hope for bravery and against slavery showing resistance. First I'm crawling, then I'm walking,
[47:01.360 --> 47:07.280] then I start strutting. Just so glad to make my living pushing buttons.
[47:07.280 --> 47:18.800] Woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, woah.
[47:18.800 --> 47:27.600] Yeah, and we sat down to play Monopoly. We all wanted to win the game. We gave some guys this
[47:27.600 --> 47:39.720] Okay, we are back. I think we're back. Got it, got it. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton,
[47:39.720 --> 47:47.400] Rudebler Radio, and we're talking about all the points. I've got this huge map and I've
[47:47.400 --> 47:57.880] got all the points. So at each question in my questionnaire, I will have a hyperlink
[47:57.880 --> 48:05.840] to a folder. In every case we come along across that goes to this point we put in that folder.
[48:05.840 --> 48:11.520] So we're setting up an AI classifier. The first thing we want to tell the AI engine
[48:11.520 --> 48:21.360] to do is go look at all of the case law and find those strings of characters that define
[48:21.360 --> 48:33.000] a statute or a case. Statutes are easy enough to define and cases are all cited by a book
[48:33.000 --> 48:51.520] number, the publisher, like 361 US 91. I think that's screws for US. 361 is the book, US
[48:51.520 --> 49:00.520] is the publisher, 91 is the page it starts on. So we can have it look for those strings
[49:00.520 --> 49:09.600] and we start out with all the statutes. We look for all of the statutes and I have questionnaires
[49:09.600 --> 49:14.760] for all the statutes. All the sub-paragraphs, sub-sub-paragraphs, I've got everything in
[49:14.760 --> 49:20.760] there. And every where one of those is cited in the codes then I put a hyperlink to that
[49:20.760 --> 49:32.560] case in this folder. So now I have all of the cases that reference this statute. And
[49:32.560 --> 49:48.640] then once I get that done now we work at teaching the engine to look in a case and find these
[49:48.640 --> 49:54.640] specific issues. This turned out to be a lot harder than I thought it would be. But it's
[49:54.640 --> 50:02.640] not beyond what we can do. Legalese, they don't speak English in court, they speak
[50:02.640 --> 50:13.640] legalese. And legalese is a structured language when judges render rulings and this is the
[50:13.640 --> 50:21.960] place we look in the case law is in the ruling itself. When they render rulings they use
[50:21.960 --> 50:34.360] a strategy. Essentially each judge uses their own strategy to frame this case within the
[50:34.360 --> 50:44.640] body of law. Each one of them does this somewhat differently. But they're all trying to do
[50:44.640 --> 50:50.080] the same thing and they're trying to do the same thing in the same language. So there
[50:50.080 --> 50:57.280] are going to be some consistencies in there that we can teach an AI engine to look for.
[50:57.280 --> 51:04.120] The problem is I don't know what those consistencies are yet. One of the things I'm having my people
[51:04.120 --> 51:12.560] do who are building the questionnaires is I'm having them trying to figure out how do
[51:12.560 --> 51:21.920] we create questions. When we were developing that's one of the first things humans learn
[51:21.920 --> 51:33.600] how to do is ask for things. We create questions. But we've learned to do that before we had
[51:33.600 --> 51:43.080] enough language to define what we were doing. And it became automatic. We look at a statement
[51:43.080 --> 51:52.240] and boom, it's a question. So what are the mechanics of that? No idea. So for an AI engine
[51:52.240 --> 52:01.960] I don't need all of the mechanics. I need some structure. Something that from a structural
[52:01.960 --> 52:07.560] standpoint that comes up consistent. And as people build questions, I'm trying to get
[52:07.560 --> 52:13.640] them to mark down their comments on what the middle process is they're going through as
[52:13.640 --> 52:23.000] they create this question. If I can find one or two key elements, we program that into
[52:23.000 --> 52:28.760] an AI engine and then run the AI engine on some case law. The AI engine is going to come
[52:28.760 --> 52:38.800] up with errors. But the errors will be relatively consistent. And when we look at the error,
[52:38.800 --> 52:46.080] then we can make adjustments to correct for that error. And then you'll find other errors.
[52:46.080 --> 52:52.200] And as we adjust it, we'll be able to teach that AI engine to go in and look at the codes
[52:52.200 --> 52:59.680] and break and look at the language in the orders in these cases and break them apart
[52:59.680 --> 53:10.880] by legal issues and points related to those issues. Does that make sense, Scott? It does.
[53:10.880 --> 53:18.160] The case law is huge. But if we can just break them down, if I can get an AI engine to do
[53:18.160 --> 53:27.160] 80% of it, we can go through the code like crap through a goose. And every time we isolate
[53:27.160 --> 53:34.120] a code and stick it to a point, it is done. We don't have to go over. These questionnaires
[53:34.120 --> 53:43.160] I'm building, they have been in the last six months, I've put in $70,000 on building these
[53:43.160 --> 53:50.480] questions. I'm not a quarter of the way through it. It's long and it's detailed. But once
[53:50.480 --> 53:58.840] it's done, it's done. I do have the major, you know, those due process issues that come
[53:58.840 --> 54:03.320] up in every case. That's what I've got pretty well done. And we can walk through a due process
[54:03.320 --> 54:08.560] on any case you bring up. It makes no difference. We'll walk right through it. And once we
[54:08.560 --> 54:15.040] can get the case law signed to it, then a lawyer, in order to find the first case on
[54:15.040 --> 54:21.000] point, he goes to the point, opens the folder. There may be a few cases in there that aren't
[54:21.000 --> 54:26.080] exactly on point. But if you find some that aren't exactly on point, then he can open
[54:26.080 --> 54:30.520] up the questionnaire and say, okay, this one shouldn't go here. We should move it over
[54:30.520 --> 54:37.480] here. We're setting up the program to make it available to lawyers for free. The questionnaires
[54:37.480 --> 54:44.120] and the research repository, what we will sell the lawyer will be documents that we
[54:44.120 --> 54:54.640] create. And the questionnaires that I'm putting up on the legal.io site, I don't have the
[54:54.640 --> 55:00.720] documents in there. This system won't produce the documents. But I will put an estric or
[55:00.720 --> 55:11.680] a pound sign in front of the question on each item that say this one says no. If you answer
[55:11.680 --> 55:17.680] no to this question, it triggers a document. And I'll put a pound sign there and then you
[55:17.680 --> 55:23.240] can go into the notations. And it will tell you what document is indicated. Did you show
[55:23.240 --> 55:29.320] up at court on the day and time your ticket required you to be there? Yes. Did the clerk
[55:29.320 --> 55:38.600] ask you for a plea? Yes. Bang. Estric or pound sign. You go into the notation. You charge
[55:38.600 --> 55:43.920] the system creates a criminal complaint against the clerk for impersonating public official.
[55:43.920 --> 55:50.360] A complaint against the judge for simulating a legal process, complaining against both
[55:50.360 --> 55:57.080] of them for criminal conspiracy to commit and he just perps them out. Now, I won't have
[55:57.080 --> 56:02.120] this creating them yet, but that's what it will do at the end of the day. So the big
[56:02.120 --> 56:10.840] job is getting these, all of these cases sorted out. Once we have that, then we give it to
[56:10.840 --> 56:16.680] the lawyers. The reason we give it to the lawyers is so that anytime there are changes
[56:16.680 --> 56:22.560] in case law, the lawyers can go in and open it up. You know, they'll send us suggestions
[56:22.560 --> 56:27.720] and we'll have it moderated. They'll say at this place we have this new ruling that changes
[56:27.720 --> 56:32.360] this. It needs to be adjusted. We go in there and make the adjustments. So the lawyers pretty
[56:32.360 --> 56:40.760] well do all the work for us. And it keeps the questionnaire up to the minute. Not just
[56:40.760 --> 56:48.880] the litigation guides. You know, they generally print over two years. So you've got case
[56:48.880 --> 56:57.480] law within two years. Well, with this system, we got case law up to the today. If a ruling
[56:57.480 --> 57:05.200] comes down today, tomorrow we'll have it in our system. Now, a lawyer can get a case,
[57:05.200 --> 57:08.800] send his client to the questionnaire, they go through the questionnaire and isolate all
[57:08.800 --> 57:15.600] of the elements, issues and points related to those issues, spits out all the documents
[57:15.600 --> 57:23.240] that he needs to address all those issues. He may make it available to the prosa. That's
[57:23.240 --> 57:29.160] why I say we will eliminate the profession of a lawyer and get lawyers to pay us to do
[57:29.160 --> 57:39.520] it. The prosa can come into court with just as much law as the lawyer. Now, look at the
[57:39.520 --> 57:46.960] traffic tickets site we're building. You go to it first and right now in Texas and once
[57:46.960 --> 57:53.200] I get the other states flushed out, it will spit you out probably between 100 and 150
[57:53.200 --> 58:02.120] pages of documentation. You don't have to know anything. Just sign it and send it. If
[58:02.120 --> 58:06.880] it's got an acknowledgement on it, they get the notary site in front of a notary, send
[58:06.880 --> 58:15.840] it. The court's going to get it and that's a couple hundred bucks ticket. Lawyer costs
[58:15.840 --> 58:19.560] you a hundred bucks an hour. You're going to pay a lawyer a hundred bucks an hour to
[58:19.560 --> 58:27.120] read 150 pages of documentation and then respond to it, not going to happen. The judge, he's
[58:27.120 --> 58:31.960] going to read all these documents and not going to happen. Denied, denied, denied, denied.
[58:31.960 --> 58:38.400] Then you go to our second questionnaire and that's when they find out it was our intention
[58:38.400 --> 58:50.360] that you deny everything. Hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll be right back.
[58:50.360 --> 58:55.360] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America
[58:55.360 --> 59:01.000] is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:05.340] The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.340 --> 59:09.960] today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.960 --> 59:15.160] help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three-volume
[59:15.160 --> 59:20.480] set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of
[59:20.480 --> 59:26.080] the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how
[59:26.080 --> 59:32.280] to build up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements
[59:32.280 --> 59:46.640] of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online
[59:46.640 --> 01:00:00.720] at bfa.org. You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at www.logosradio-network.com.
[01:00:00.720 --> 01:00:06.960] The following use flash is brought to you by the Low Star Lowdowns. Markets for Wednesday
[01:00:06.960 --> 01:00:13.320] the 20th of November 2018 open with precious metals, gold at $1,213 and 20 cents an ounce,
[01:00:13.320 --> 01:00:21.160] silver $14.18 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $51.56 a barrel, Brent
[01:00:21.160 --> 01:00:31.480] Crude $60.21 a barrel and cryptos Bitcoin $4,217.98, XRP $0.38, Ethereum $118.92 and
[01:00:31.480 --> 01:00:41.760] Bitcoin cash is $190.10 a crypto coin. Today in history, the year 1979, Air New Zealand
[01:00:41.760 --> 01:00:47.880] Flight 901, a DC-10 sightseeing flight over Antarctica crashes into Mount Erebus, killing
[01:00:47.880 --> 01:00:57.360] all 257 people on board. New Mount Erebus disaster, today in history.
[01:00:57.360 --> 01:01:02.120] And recent news, 66 acres of land owned by the Catholic Diocese of Brownsville is under
[01:01:02.120 --> 01:01:06.400] notice for survey by the federal government for fencing and related infrastructure. Home
[01:01:06.400 --> 01:01:10.960] of La Lumita Historic Catholic Mission, the diocese is contesting such plans with the
[01:01:10.960 --> 01:01:15.840] bishop of the diocese, Daniel Flores, saying that such actions go against the First Amendment
[01:01:15.840 --> 01:01:20.400] Fremont religion. However, a document filed in the federal court in McAllen last week
[01:01:20.400 --> 01:01:24.600] states that the United States needs immediate possession of the subject property in order
[01:01:24.600 --> 01:01:29.120] to meet the congressional directive. Brownsville attorney David Garza rejected the filing claims
[01:01:29.120 --> 01:01:32.600] that the government would take possession of the land for a whole year in order to survey
[01:01:32.600 --> 01:01:36.680] it for the construction of the border wall, and instead claims that the survey of land
[01:01:36.680 --> 01:01:43.000] would only require one or two days at most, and not an entire year.
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:47.080] Last Wednesday, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied a trial court's recommendation
[01:01:47.080 --> 01:01:51.400] to relieve Jeff Woods from death row for his involvement in 1996's Convenience to a
[01:01:51.400 --> 01:01:55.840] Robbery, which ended with the death of the store clerk. Woods was outside of the getaway
[01:01:55.840 --> 01:02:00.680] car the whole time. With unexpected help from Lucy Hale, the prosecutor in Woods'
[01:02:00.680 --> 01:02:06.360] initial trial, even writing the Texas Board of Pardons in parole in August of 2017, asking
[01:02:06.360 --> 01:02:11.720] Governor Greg Abbott to reduce Woods' sentence to life in prison instead. However, Texas's
[01:02:11.720 --> 01:02:15.800] Law of Parties, a law that states a person who has aided someone else while they commit
[01:02:15.800 --> 01:02:20.240] a capital murder, states that such accomplices are also eligible for the death penalty as
[01:02:20.240 --> 01:02:25.240] well.
[01:02:25.240 --> 01:02:29.400] White House Texas Police Chief Ed Morris confirmed that Texas Rangers were investigating a shooting
[01:02:29.400 --> 01:02:34.320] incident involving a officer at a long-view police officer's home in the White House City
[01:02:34.320 --> 01:02:39.680] Limits, the weekend of November 17th. DPS spokeswoman Jean Doric said Rangers were requested
[01:02:39.680 --> 01:02:43.680] to investigate an officer involved shooting. No arrests have been made. It's still unknown
[01:02:43.680 --> 01:02:47.520] whether anyone was injured, nor have any names of anyone involved been released, as
[01:02:47.520 --> 01:02:52.520] of yet. Not to mention the Smith County Sheriff's Office doesn't have any record of the incident.
[01:02:52.520 --> 01:03:07.520] This is Rick Rody with your Lowdown for November 28th, 2018.
[01:03:07.520 --> 01:03:18.400] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rural Law Radio. And we're talking about how we're going
[01:03:18.400 --> 01:03:27.280] to eliminate the profession of lawyer and get lawyers to pay us to do it. I'm talking
[01:03:27.280 --> 01:03:34.920] about this on the air, and lawyers are going to hear this, and they're going to know that
[01:03:34.920 --> 01:03:39.480] I'm eliminating their profession and getting them to pay me to do it. So why am I not concerned
[01:03:39.480 --> 01:03:46.400] about that? I'm not concerned about that because when a lawyer comes to court, he is
[01:03:46.400 --> 01:03:56.200] learned to counsel. Greatest fear he has above all others is missing something. If a lawyer
[01:03:56.200 --> 01:04:03.560] misses something, he can not only lose the case, he can also win the case and not win
[01:04:03.560 --> 01:04:09.160] as much as he would have if he had found this other issue. And if the client knows about
[01:04:09.160 --> 01:04:15.160] that, the client can sue him for that, where he won the case, but didn't he win as much
[01:04:15.160 --> 01:04:20.800] as he would have? The lawyer can be sued for it. So lawyers are terrified about missing
[01:04:20.800 --> 01:04:26.760] stuff. And then Westlaw and Lexis Nexus come along, and they really screwed things up for
[01:04:26.760 --> 01:04:34.920] lawyers. So lawyers had to hunker down and focus on one tiny little area of practice.
[01:04:34.920 --> 01:04:46.320] So we come out with this tool. This tool will focus all of the case law onto the points
[01:04:46.320 --> 01:04:54.680] that are related to that case law. So you can go to this research repository, just follow
[01:04:54.680 --> 01:04:59.920] the line of questionings down to the point that you're dealing with, and you've got all
[01:04:59.920 --> 01:05:06.480] the case law right there. You don't have to worry about missing anything anymore. So what
[01:05:06.480 --> 01:05:11.640] do you do if you've been practicing for 20 years, and you get this young upstart just
[01:05:11.640 --> 01:05:18.080] out of law school? Well, he don't know dailies squat, and he knows he doesn't. So he uses
[01:05:18.080 --> 01:05:28.640] this case law, this tool. This guy comes into court, and he hasn't missed anything. You've
[01:05:28.640 --> 01:05:33.400] been practicing 20 years to think you know what's going on, but you also know your biggest
[01:05:33.400 --> 01:05:38.400] fear is missing something now. You've got somebody who's not going to miss anything.
[01:05:38.400 --> 01:05:47.320] You don't have any choice. You'll have to use it so you can keep up with the upstarts.
[01:05:47.320 --> 01:05:56.960] And then the procé comes along, and he can do the same thing. He can come in with the
[01:05:56.960 --> 01:06:08.680] same amount of law that you can come into court with. Even if he's using you as a lawyer,
[01:06:08.680 --> 01:06:13.200] he knows all of the motions and pleadings are indicated by the answers, because he's
[01:06:13.200 --> 01:06:22.200] got a copy of them. He has every single issue implicated. Now, you don't have to address
[01:06:22.200 --> 01:06:29.440] all of those, but if you don't address one, you need to be ready to explain to your client
[01:06:29.440 --> 01:06:35.520] why you didn't address one, because the client has as much knowledge as you do. They may
[01:06:35.520 --> 01:06:40.480] not have the understanding of how to argue legal issues as well as you, but they got
[01:06:40.480 --> 01:06:49.080] all the law sitting right in front of them. This will change everything. It will make
[01:06:49.080 --> 01:06:59.160] the law very consistent, and they'll all have to use it. Does all that make sense?
[01:06:59.160 --> 01:07:04.520] It does. What are the state-by-state differences, or how will that compute in?
[01:07:04.520 --> 01:07:14.600] Very little. The federal government encouraged all of the states to adopt a uniform transportation
[01:07:14.600 --> 01:07:20.680] code and penal code and criminal procedure code so that a citizen could move from state
[01:07:20.680 --> 01:07:28.440] to state and be relatively comfortable in knowing when they're within law and when
[01:07:28.440 --> 01:07:36.360] they're not. All but three states adopted, but the three states that didn't, for the
[01:07:36.360 --> 01:07:47.960] most part, their codes are the same. If God made man, he made us flawed. However, he made
[01:07:47.960 --> 01:07:58.880] us consistently flawed. I was talking to a lawyer in England about developing these
[01:07:58.880 --> 01:08:05.880] codes. He said, yeah, but you're doing codes for America, and Finland's traffic code's
[01:08:05.880 --> 01:08:10.720] not going to be the same as America's traffic code. I said, well, yeah, that's right, but
[01:08:10.720 --> 01:08:16.320] an illegal left-hand turn is an illegal left-hand turn no matter where you do it. When you
[01:08:16.320 --> 01:08:21.440] address the things you can do wrong with an automobile, they're going to be the same
[01:08:21.440 --> 01:08:28.280] everywhere. When you address the penal laws, they're going to be essentially the same laws
[01:08:28.280 --> 01:08:36.520] everywhere. Murders, thefts, fraud, all these things humans do, they do everywhere, they're
[01:08:36.520 --> 01:08:41.760] all going to be in all of the codes. So once you have one body of law mapped out, you've
[01:08:41.760 --> 01:08:50.200] got 90% of all of them. That first one's the biggie. Once I get it in place, then I can
[01:08:50.200 --> 01:08:58.920] take any state, and I've picked Texas because they have what appears to be the most complete.
[01:08:58.920 --> 01:09:05.680] Texas appears to have the best body of law I've ever looked at. Every remedy I can think
[01:09:05.680 --> 01:09:12.320] of is in there. Just a matter of finding it. Well, this tool will find it for us. So if
[01:09:12.320 --> 01:09:19.680] I take the most complex, run that one out, then I can take any other state and just lay
[01:09:19.680 --> 01:09:27.320] it on top of this one, mark in the adjustments that I have to make, and I'm actually looking
[01:09:27.320 --> 01:09:36.320] at a methodology where I can put them all on top of each other. So the only thing that
[01:09:36.320 --> 01:09:44.720] will be different is a certain question will indicate that, you start out by telling what
[01:09:44.720 --> 01:09:51.680] state it's in, it'll indicate that this particular statute is unique to this state, or it's unique
[01:09:51.680 --> 01:10:00.000] to this list of states, so that we get more information in the same place. You don't just
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:05.680] get all the laws in this state. You get a comparison of how other laws in other states
[01:10:05.680 --> 01:10:16.400] of law stands relative to the one you're in, and that goes to good faith and credit. The
[01:10:16.400 --> 01:10:26.200] legislature of every state trusts the legislatures of every other state, so that if the legislature
[01:10:26.200 --> 01:10:34.200] say of Texas has addressed an issue that the legislature of Michigan has never addressed,
[01:10:34.200 --> 01:10:41.840] then the legislature of Michigan trusts the legislature of Texas to write good law, so
[01:10:41.840 --> 01:10:47.280] you can bring that law into Michigan under good faith and credit.
[01:10:47.280 --> 01:10:53.560] That's what's confusing to me, is that case law from other states, it applies or it doesn't
[01:10:53.560 --> 01:11:01.720] apply in this state? Case law in other states are not controlling their advisory, but it's
[01:11:01.720 --> 01:11:11.880] proper to bring it in when the case law addressed a fact set that the case law in your state
[01:11:11.880 --> 01:11:19.600] doesn't address. This tool will help stitch all those together, where the judge has got
[01:11:19.600 --> 01:11:27.720] this first blush issue for Michigan. We've never addressed this in Michigan, but they
[01:11:27.720 --> 01:11:34.960] have addressed it in Illinois, and they have addressed it in Kentucky, so you can bring
[01:11:34.960 --> 01:11:41.120] these in and say to the judge, this is how it was addressed in these other states. That
[01:11:41.120 --> 01:11:50.440] is advisory for the judge, but it's not controlling. It allows the judge to render a more informed
[01:11:50.440 --> 01:11:51.440] decision.
[01:11:51.440 --> 01:11:58.120] So what's the difference in how you present advisory legislation versus controlling legislation
[01:11:58.120 --> 01:11:59.120] to a judge?
[01:11:59.120 --> 01:12:08.240] Well, you don't have to. The case law itself will indicate whether it's controlling or
[01:12:08.240 --> 01:12:20.440] not. If you're in Michigan, Michigan Appellate Court and Supreme Court rulings are controlling.
[01:12:20.440 --> 01:12:30.520] So federal law relating to an issue that goes to due process or one of the federal protections
[01:12:30.520 --> 01:12:36.200] would also be controlling. No other state would be controlling. All other states would
[01:12:36.200 --> 01:12:42.520] be advisory. A district court decision, say you have an issue that's only been addressed
[01:12:42.520 --> 01:12:50.840] in the district courts, but has never been appealed up. So you're looking for controlling
[01:12:50.840 --> 01:12:59.720] case law and there is none. However, this district judge here in this state addressed
[01:12:59.720 --> 01:13:07.440] an issue that goes to the same fact set as this issue, and this is how this judge rules.
[01:13:07.440 --> 01:13:15.960] So the judge can look at that and use that. It gives him plausible deniability. He could
[01:13:15.960 --> 01:13:24.360] say, I rule this way because I have this other case law where they have rules similarly.
[01:13:24.360 --> 01:13:30.280] So he's not just pulling something out of the air, but no other state is controlling.
[01:13:30.280 --> 01:13:39.360] It's just advisory. But when we can bring all of the states together, one set of, one
[01:13:39.360 --> 01:13:51.000] map and all of the states superimposed on top of it, then finding advisory case law,
[01:13:51.000 --> 01:13:57.640] BPCA, because it'd be right there in the same folder. If you're in Texas on a particular
[01:13:57.640 --> 01:14:02.520] point and you open it up and you don't have a squad or you got a couple cases that aren't
[01:14:02.520 --> 01:14:10.840] really sufficient, but you've got other states listed in there. Every time a case on point
[01:14:10.840 --> 01:14:16.800] from another state is located, it goes into that folder and you just add a folder for
[01:14:16.800 --> 01:14:22.320] that state and put that case law in it. So you see one in your state and it's not good
[01:14:22.320 --> 01:14:26.440] enough. You've got other states listed. You open those and you have the advisory law right
[01:14:26.440 --> 01:14:32.160] there in front of you. Lawyers will absolutely love this. Every time I mention this to a
[01:14:32.160 --> 01:14:39.520] lawyer, they all say, I've got to have that. The one thing they fear the most is missing
[01:14:39.520 --> 01:14:46.160] something. This eliminates that problem. Now lawyers can go back to general practice.
[01:14:46.160 --> 01:14:58.920] The way we're going to market this thing is we get the traffic ready and then a month
[01:14:58.920 --> 01:15:04.880] or so before we have our private sale, or I'm sorry, a month or so before we have our
[01:15:04.880 --> 01:15:16.400] public sale, before we're ready to do a full-on launch, then we launch traffic. In Texas last
[01:15:16.400 --> 01:15:27.840] year, there were approximately 9 million new cases filed. 7 million were traffic. 73 percent
[01:15:27.840 --> 01:15:35.160] of all the people who get tickets pay them. Just write a check, send it in, pay it. That
[01:15:35.160 --> 01:15:43.080] means 27 percent don't. They're not happy campers. They show up for this first hearing
[01:15:43.080 --> 01:15:48.160] and it's the job of the prosecuting attorney to talk them into a deal and they do good.
[01:15:48.160 --> 01:16:00.280] They get 99 percent of those take the deal. But 27 percent of 7 million, that's our base.
[01:16:00.280 --> 01:16:10.160] We start going to the Omen say, you go to this website for 10 bucks. Put in your information.
[01:16:10.160 --> 01:16:16.520] It spits you out all these documents. Then when you go in to meet with the prosecutor,
[01:16:16.520 --> 01:16:23.240] all you have to do is lay 150 pages of documents on the table and say, you want to fight. I'm
[01:16:23.240 --> 01:16:32.360] ready or you want to make me a deal. I cannot pass up. Then there are those who will want
[01:16:32.360 --> 01:16:39.960] to fight the ticket and it won't take many of those. But there's another aspect that
[01:16:39.960 --> 01:16:44.680] I'm about to come to a break. I'll address the other aspect when we come back. We have
[01:16:44.680 --> 01:16:51.520] a way of getting our product in front of every lawyer in the country at almost no cost in
[01:16:51.520 --> 01:16:56.320] one day. I'll explain that when we come back. Randy Caldwell with Law Radio, we'll be right
[01:16:56.320 --> 01:16:57.320] back.
[01:16:57.320 --> 01:17:10.400] It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[01:17:10.400 --> 01:17:17.640] Gun Works. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance
[01:17:17.640 --> 01:17:23.920] to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical
[01:17:23.920 --> 01:17:30.840] AR 15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[01:17:30.840 --> 01:17:37.440] Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances
[01:17:37.440 --> 01:17:44.120] to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the shows
[01:17:44.120 --> 01:17:49.400] on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality
[01:17:49.400 --> 01:17:55.480] programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Go to
[01:17:55.480 --> 01:18:00.520] LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.520 --> 01:18:05.200] I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm
[01:18:05.200 --> 01:18:09.200] so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth back. I'd be
[01:18:09.200 --> 01:18:14.120] lost without logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to
[01:18:14.120 --> 01:18:17.960] volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money
[01:18:17.960 --> 01:18:22.280] to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.280 --> 01:18:27.240] Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[01:18:27.240 --> 01:18:31.760] You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.760 --> 01:18:38.560] Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when
[01:18:38.560 --> 01:18:43.840] you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.840 --> 01:18:45.320] Do I pay extra? No.
[01:18:45.320 --> 01:18:48.200] Do I have to do anything different when I order? No.
[01:18:48.200 --> 01:18:51.400] Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.400 --> 01:18:57.320] Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.320 --> 01:18:59.000] We are welcome.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.920] Happy Holidays, Logos.
[01:19:01.920 --> 01:19:08.000] This is the Logos, Logos RadioNetwork.
[01:19:22.000 --> 01:19:28.360] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, we live on radio and we're talking about how we're
[01:19:28.360 --> 01:19:34.000] going to get this in front of everybody. The way we're going to get this in front of everybody
[01:19:34.000 --> 01:19:43.800] is we market this to people who have tickets. We start putting it out there and getting
[01:19:43.800 --> 01:19:52.760] people to use it. And then when we're ready to launch, we add a feature to the website.
[01:19:52.760 --> 01:20:02.760] They do this questionnaire and our tool builds an evaluation of their case. And we tell them
[01:20:02.760 --> 01:20:12.320] that if you would like to consider counsel in this matter, if you click this button here,
[01:20:12.320 --> 01:20:21.080] we will email this evaluation to every lawyer that practices within your jurisdiction. And
[01:20:21.080 --> 01:20:28.280] we mean every lawyer. We don't care what he practices. If he's got a bar card in this
[01:20:28.280 --> 01:20:37.400] jurisdiction, we send him this evaluation as a solicitation for representation. This
[01:20:37.400 --> 01:20:46.600] is how lawyers are intended to get their business. In Texas, we're one of the only states that
[01:20:46.600 --> 01:20:54.320] have baritry laws. If a lawyer comes to you and says, oh, I see you're an accident. I'm
[01:20:54.320 --> 01:21:00.760] a lawyer. I can help you sue these guys. That's a felony in Texas. It's intended that lawyers
[01:21:00.760 --> 01:21:10.680] get their business by word of mouth, by reputation, by solicitation. So we send this evaluation
[01:21:10.680 --> 01:21:17.520] to every lawyer as a solicitation for representation. They look at it. They've got a complete analysis
[01:21:17.520 --> 01:21:28.360] of the case. They've got a link where they can click on it. And they've got a list of
[01:21:28.360 --> 01:21:34.760] all of the motions and pleadings that are indicated by the responses. And they've got
[01:21:34.760 --> 01:21:38.680] a link. You click on this link and you can download all of those motions and pleadings
[01:21:38.680 --> 01:21:45.280] in fully high print format. So if you don't practice in this area, you could. If you wanted
[01:21:45.280 --> 01:21:50.200] to extend your practice, you could extend it to this area and not have to worry about
[01:21:50.200 --> 01:21:58.720] missing anything. And this is a way of demonstrating the product to every lawyer that we send this
[01:21:58.720 --> 01:22:06.600] to. We can get this in front of every lawyer in the country in one day. That's why I want
[01:22:06.600 --> 01:22:18.280] everything ready. When Lexus and Westlaw sees what we're doing, they have a real problem.
[01:22:18.280 --> 01:22:25.560] They could produce a similar product. It'd probably take them six months to a year. But
[01:22:25.560 --> 01:22:31.560] if they did that, their product would undermine their primary research engine just the way
[01:22:31.560 --> 01:22:40.640] ours does. So that doesn't help them. The only way to deal with us is to buy out our investors
[01:22:40.640 --> 01:22:51.160] and shut us down. That's why we're doing a private security sale that only sells income
[01:22:51.160 --> 01:22:57.560] interest in the business and no voting interest. So the big boys can't come in and swallow
[01:22:57.560 --> 01:23:08.240] us and shut us down. The numbers on this thing, we ran our numbers and projected generally
[01:23:08.240 --> 01:23:20.680] 1% is a really safe low ball amount to predict. If you do any mailing, almost makes no difference
[01:23:20.680 --> 01:23:29.640] what it is, you can expect a 1% response. We projected a 1-tenth of 1% response. And
[01:23:29.640 --> 01:23:41.400] in five years at 1-tenth of 1% per month, we project $2.2 billion. This thing will make
[01:23:41.400 --> 01:23:47.080] a massive amount of money. But the whole purpose of it never was the money. And the money is
[01:23:47.080 --> 01:23:53.480] the way to make sure it works, make sure you can get it out there. Because there are so
[01:23:53.480 --> 01:24:02.400] many potential customers, we do one set of code for Texas. Our customer base is 25 million
[01:24:02.400 --> 01:24:11.720] people. But the whole United States, once we've got one code done, cranking out the rest
[01:24:11.720 --> 01:24:19.080] of them be relatively a piece of cake. And then we've got a 325 million customer pool.
[01:24:19.080 --> 01:24:28.160] So it's a very, very large market. And it's a product that will apply to most every market.
[01:24:28.160 --> 01:24:38.120] And once it's out there, once people realize it's out there, then we have the public using
[01:24:38.120 --> 01:24:47.800] this. Law will become absolutely consistent. Because we have all the checks and balances
[01:24:47.800 --> 01:24:52.680] we need. We have all the remedies we need. We just don't know if it's there. In this
[01:24:52.680 --> 01:25:02.200] case, a prosaed litigant files a set of documents, and the judge fails to rule on every element
[01:25:02.200 --> 01:25:07.400] in every document. For every element he doesn't rule on, he gets a criminal complaint. He
[01:25:07.400 --> 01:25:17.040] gets a judicial conduct complaint. As a matter of course, these guys, they won't know what
[01:25:17.040 --> 01:25:25.200] to do. They will put them in a position to where they cannot get insurance. They can't
[01:25:25.200 --> 01:25:34.240] get bonded. The insurance companies will either have to change the way they do business
[01:25:34.240 --> 01:25:40.320] dramatically, or the judges will have to change the way they do business. Because not only
[01:25:40.320 --> 01:25:44.520] will they get judicial conduct complaints, they will be sending criminal complaints to
[01:25:44.520 --> 01:25:51.280] a grand jury. The judges say, if you don't like my ruling, you can always appeal. I had
[01:25:51.280 --> 01:25:57.920] a district judge tell me that once that I was trying to file criminal charges. And he
[01:25:57.920 --> 01:26:04.520] said, well, then you should appeal. I said, don't ask me to appeal. Say, you go before
[01:26:04.520 --> 01:26:09.480] a corrupt judge, and he gives a bogus ruling, and they say, oh, that's okay. You can go
[01:26:09.480 --> 01:26:14.080] before a whole panel of corrupt judges, and they'll really screw your royal. The judge
[01:26:14.080 --> 01:26:18.120] kind of laughed, and he said, well, I don't think it's quite that bad. That's because
[01:26:18.120 --> 01:26:25.640] you're not prosaed. I've got a better idea. I'll appeal to a grand jury. Well, Mr.
[01:26:25.640 --> 01:26:30.080] Judge Cohen, you can't appeal to a grand jury. Sure can. I can appeal to a grand jury to
[01:26:30.080 --> 01:26:39.200] indict the judge for official misconduct. And if you're in a state that doesn't have
[01:26:39.200 --> 01:26:48.200] a grand jury, you run the routine on them. We've spent a long time developing the routine.
[01:26:48.200 --> 01:26:54.520] We file a complaint. Someone steps up to shield a person from prosecution. We file against
[01:26:54.520 --> 01:27:00.480] them. After two or three of those, they realize that we deliberately set them up to do that.
[01:27:00.480 --> 01:27:08.480] You know, I'm in Texas, and if you get around Dallas, Fort Worth, or Austin, or Amarillo,
[01:27:08.480 --> 01:27:17.840] Houston, I haven't hammered San Antonio yet, but I'll probably get to them. The word is,
[01:27:17.840 --> 01:27:23.720] if this counten comes into your office, watch out, because he's trying to get you to do
[01:27:23.720 --> 01:27:28.480] something so he can file criminal charges against you. That's right, I am. Don't mess
[01:27:28.480 --> 01:27:34.080] with me. Follow law. You won't have any problem with me. If we can put this in the hands
[01:27:34.080 --> 01:27:42.880] of everybody, Scott, what are they going to do? How are they going to do with this?
[01:27:42.880 --> 01:27:51.520] Change their ways, or you with the consequences. I don't know how they would do it soon enough.
[01:27:51.520 --> 01:27:58.520] This has shut down everything. Just traffic will completely shut down traffic enforcement.
[01:27:58.520 --> 01:28:09.600] You get a $200 traffic ticket. They hand out this ticket. They're looking to collect
[01:28:09.600 --> 01:28:14.760] a couple hundred bucks on, and it's going to cost them several thousand just to adjudicate
[01:28:14.760 --> 01:28:21.040] it. And then when they don't adjudicate it right, it gets really ugly. And the one doing
[01:28:21.040 --> 01:28:26.400] it to them, they don't have to do anything. They just go, answer your questions, spit
[01:28:26.400 --> 01:28:33.960] out the documents, sign them, send them, and you have them locked up. They're not going
[01:28:33.960 --> 01:28:42.120] to lay down a rollover for us. So we've got to figure out how they're going to try to
[01:28:42.120 --> 01:28:50.640] interfere with us. Some things I've got taken care of. You notice I have LegalEarth.io.
[01:28:50.640 --> 01:28:59.760] I own LegalEarth.net, but I'm not using that one. I'm using LegalEarth.io because that's
[01:28:59.760 --> 01:29:06.040] Indian Ocean, and the United States will have no influence over them, so they can't redirect
[01:29:06.040 --> 01:29:14.080] my URL. That's one thing they'll do. They redirect your URL to the FBI, and the FBI puts
[01:29:14.080 --> 01:29:21.080] up this page that says what a dirty rotten scam this is. Don't there go there, or your
[01:29:21.080 --> 01:29:26.840] license, jeopardy, blah, blah, blah. Well, we've got that part fixed. But I still haven't
[01:29:26.840 --> 01:29:32.640] figured out the other things that it likes you to do. I do have someone that's called
[01:29:32.640 --> 01:29:38.760] in that I would like to bring in. As soon as you come back, I'll bring in Ken in Missouri.
[01:29:38.760 --> 01:29:45.840] I am planning on Ken being my mentor. He's the one I spoke to earlier that knows more
[01:29:45.840 --> 01:29:51.800] than me, and I'm thrilled to find him. Hang on. About to go to break. Randy Kelton. Roodle
[01:29:51.800 --> 01:29:55.840] R-Radio. We'll be right back.
[01:29:55.840 --> 01:30:04.840] It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number,
[01:30:04.840 --> 01:30:09.000] and date of birth. But you should think twice before giving away your personal data. I'm
[01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:12.480] Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:12.480 --> 01:30:17.080] Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for, and creating a massive
[01:30:17.080 --> 01:30:22.720] database of your personal information. That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.720 --> 01:30:27.240] StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine. StartPage.com doesn't store
[01:30:27.240 --> 01:30:31.840] your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and their third-party
[01:30:31.840 --> 01:30:37.440] certified. If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with StartPage. Great search
[01:30:37.440 --> 01:30:43.200] results and total privacy. StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:43.200 --> 01:30:47.920] Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere. But just because a piece of paper asks for information
[01:30:47.920 --> 01:30:52.280] doesn't mean you have to give it. I leave blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write
[01:30:52.280 --> 01:30:57.960] N slash A for not applicable, and usually nobody notices or cares. I never give my social
[01:30:57.960 --> 01:31:02.760] security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government
[01:31:02.760 --> 01:31:07.520] requirement, and I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually
[01:31:07.520 --> 01:31:11.680] want them to call me, and that's pretty rare. To preserve our munition privacy, we need
[01:31:11.680 --> 01:31:17.240] to practice saying no to random data requests. It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier
[01:31:17.240 --> 01:31:31.800] the more you do it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.800 --> 01:31:37.200] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The
[01:31:37.200 --> 01:31:41.840] government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have
[01:31:41.840 --> 01:31:46.160] concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have
[01:31:46.160 --> 01:31:50.720] given their lives. Thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy
[01:31:50.720 --> 01:31:53.760] theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an
[01:31:53.760 --> 01:31:58.320] Air Force pilot. I'm the father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the
[01:31:58.320 --> 01:32:03.640] truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home
[01:32:03.640 --> 01:32:07.360] Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come
[01:32:07.360 --> 01:32:11.000] on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:14.880] them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about
[01:32:14.880 --> 01:32:18.760] your roof. That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle
[01:32:18.760 --> 01:32:24.200] the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year
[01:32:24.200 --> 01:32:28.800] A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country
[01:32:28.800 --> 01:32:33.420] Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call
[01:32:33.420 --> 01:32:41.920] 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and
[01:32:41.920 --> 01:32:46.480] we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.480 --> 01:32:55.480] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745
[01:32:55.480 --> 01:33:00.000] or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean,
[01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:26.000] I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:32.160] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelkin, Rural Law Radio. And we're talking to Scott. And Scott,
[01:33:32.160 --> 01:33:42.480] I kind of used you here so I could go through this kind of presentation on this tool I'm
[01:33:42.480 --> 01:33:47.680] building. So what do you think?
[01:33:47.680 --> 01:33:53.080] I think it's a great idea. I think it's the right thing to do. Whatever we'll combat
[01:33:53.080 --> 01:34:00.760] the statutory scheme. The more I look at it, the better I'd like what I see. I'm going
[01:34:00.760 --> 01:34:08.720] to bring in Ken from Missouri. Hello, Ken. Greetings. Tell me a state. Greetings. Now,
[01:34:08.720 --> 01:34:16.320] I've talked to Ken. Has someone referred me to Ken? And it's very seldom that I come
[01:34:16.320 --> 01:34:24.280] across someone who's more knowledgeable than me. I know that doesn't sound right, but it
[01:34:24.280 --> 01:34:32.200] gets frustrating trying to find people that understand code and how to deliver code. And
[01:34:32.200 --> 01:34:37.920] after this 12 years that I've been looking, it's very seldom I come across someone who
[01:34:37.920 --> 01:34:46.120] can do this. And Ken was refreshing. So Ken, can you kind of give us an idea of who you
[01:34:46.120 --> 01:34:49.240] are, of what you do?
[01:34:49.240 --> 01:34:55.480] I am just an independent legal aide. I kind of put it under the umbrella of a Christian
[01:34:55.480 --> 01:35:01.160] ministry. My roots are in Christian counseling. I was a professional Christian counselor.
[01:35:01.160 --> 01:35:07.760] And I brought with me the principles, I believe, literally God gave me a promotion because
[01:35:07.760 --> 01:35:13.120] we're living in such difficult times. I won't go into that right now. So I brought over
[01:35:13.120 --> 01:35:19.200] some of my advocacy principles and good faith, communication, relationship principles, and
[01:35:19.200 --> 01:35:26.920] just started helping people 15 years ago. And right now I'm writing a book on redress
[01:35:26.920 --> 01:35:32.560] of grievances. There's five rights mentioned in the First Amendment. There's a reason
[01:35:32.560 --> 01:35:37.160] for that. They're probably the most important. I haven't really analyzed them philosophically
[01:35:37.160 --> 01:35:42.760] yet. But that's where redress is found. And it's a right like every other right that
[01:35:42.760 --> 01:35:49.200] pre-exists the government and the Constitution. So I'm writing a little book on that. And
[01:35:49.200 --> 01:35:56.480] it's basically running parallel with exactly what Randy's doing. The court have a duty
[01:35:56.480 --> 01:36:04.440] to rule by case law. There's a case precedent that a federal judge set out a few years back
[01:36:04.440 --> 01:36:11.080] when he was retiring and he laid it all out for everybody. And it's the doctrine of precedent.
[01:36:11.080 --> 01:36:19.720] I won't go into that necessarily right now. So we don't have any rulers, kings, or dictators.
[01:36:19.720 --> 01:36:25.680] So wherever you are in government, and this will be the end of my intro, whether it's
[01:36:25.680 --> 01:36:33.160] a judge or a janitor, all the way executive branch, whatever, if you ask or bring agreements
[01:36:33.160 --> 01:36:38.520] to any government person, they have to give the case law that they're relying on or a
[01:36:38.520 --> 01:36:44.080] statute that's annotated with case law. That's where I've really labored. It goes right along
[01:36:44.080 --> 01:36:52.360] what Randy's doing. It'll clean up everything potentially. My answer to your question of
[01:36:52.360 --> 01:36:55.600] what do you think will happen when we, you know, if everybody gets on board and starts
[01:36:55.600 --> 01:37:01.560] doing criminal charges is it's like raising children. You're going to run across some
[01:37:01.560 --> 01:37:09.480] teenagers that are difficult. So, you know, it's not a panacea, but it's the only paradigm
[01:37:09.480 --> 01:37:14.920] that is appropriate that we're adults. If you're not an adult, you're disqualified and
[01:37:14.920 --> 01:37:22.560] you're going to lose privileges. There's various levels of raising children and raising teenagers,
[01:37:22.560 --> 01:37:28.200] but that's my response is what do I think will happen? Well, I don't want to think about
[01:37:28.200 --> 01:37:33.040] it too much because we just have to do it. I mean, there's nothing else. You've gone
[01:37:33.040 --> 01:37:39.240] along the same lines as me and figured it out. And I really applaud you. I see what
[01:37:39.240 --> 01:37:42.880] you're doing, the marketing and all that. So, I'll set up. I gave us kind of a long
[01:37:42.880 --> 01:37:43.880] intro there.
[01:37:43.880 --> 01:37:50.360] Well, good. Ken, you know, I've talked to Ken for quite a while and it's seldom I come
[01:37:50.360 --> 01:37:59.360] across this depth of knowledge and I want to say wisdom. Wisdom comes with being beat
[01:37:59.360 --> 01:38:06.920] up with doing things wrong or making mistakes and correcting them. And when I talk to Ken,
[01:38:06.920 --> 01:38:12.800] he's obviously been the places that I've been. I'm going to try to talk Ken into becoming
[01:38:12.800 --> 01:38:23.160] a co-host on this network. He has knowledge that we would all benefit from. What areas
[01:38:23.160 --> 01:38:29.800] do you tend to work in? Are you limited in areas? Do you specialize or do you do general
[01:38:29.800 --> 01:38:30.800] work?
[01:38:30.800 --> 01:38:40.720] Well, I don't think I'm too much further advanced than you. I read statues and procedure
[01:38:40.720 --> 01:38:48.120] and it's really all you need to do because to me the FRCP and state Supreme Court rules
[01:38:48.120 --> 01:38:53.400] of procedure are the area of law that are pretty much untainted. They haven't been able
[01:38:53.400 --> 01:39:00.920] to sabotage too much and they contain the righteous integrity principles that if you
[01:39:00.920 --> 01:39:06.440] know procedure, then you can do anything. So, answer your question. I started up like
[01:39:06.440 --> 01:39:11.560] a lot of people trying to figure out how to save my house from foreclosure and that was
[01:39:11.560 --> 01:39:20.520] my entry point and then a lot of people around me in the circles that I was in were losing
[01:39:20.520 --> 01:39:25.480] children in battles to CPS and so for eight years I focused on that. I helped lead some
[01:39:25.480 --> 01:39:31.320] groups trying to help people learn how to ride an affidavit, learn court procedure and
[01:39:31.320 --> 01:39:39.400] kind of moved on into that area. So, lately I've just been battling the city and the county
[01:39:39.400 --> 01:39:47.120] where I live slowly, administratively trying to reason with them before I dropped some federal
[01:39:47.120 --> 01:39:52.120] lawsuits on them and then, man, once you do that, it takes a year or two out of your life.
[01:39:52.120 --> 01:39:56.600] So, that's kind of where I am. I'm in a bunch of federal lawsuits now. Slowly have moved
[01:39:56.600 --> 01:40:03.880] into some federal lawsuits and that's basically just those are on city and county violations
[01:40:03.880 --> 01:40:09.480] where they come and code ticket to you and take your property for back taxes and stuff
[01:40:09.480 --> 01:40:12.720] like that. So, that's kind of where I've been battling.
[01:40:12.720 --> 01:40:20.720] Well, I have a lot of tools for those areas. I'm helping someone now. You've talked to
[01:40:20.720 --> 01:40:32.880] Phillip or Tim on his issue with the local municipality. I probably take a little bit
[01:40:32.880 --> 01:40:39.160] different. The real area I find Ken to be so far ahead of me is in the procedure and
[01:40:39.160 --> 01:40:46.480] primarily in appellate procedures. I don't have a lot of experience in that area and
[01:40:46.480 --> 01:40:53.080] I struggle with it. Ken knows it much better than me so he's going to be a great asset.
[01:40:53.080 --> 01:41:03.080] What I want to do while we're doing all of this work is we look at it and ask ourselves
[01:41:03.080 --> 01:41:14.800] how can we take what we're doing and reduce it to a set of questions so that someone else
[01:41:14.800 --> 01:41:25.280] can go through those questions and extract our knowledge from the base of questions.
[01:41:25.280 --> 01:41:32.040] With any area of law, once we get a base down, it doesn't really matter much how incomplete
[01:41:32.040 --> 01:41:37.480] it is to start with because once we got a basic questionnaire down there, every time
[01:41:37.480 --> 01:41:41.760] we come across a place where we've missed something, we can crack it open and add in
[01:41:41.760 --> 01:41:50.600] what we've missed and the tool begins to grow itself. I've been researching law for 30 years
[01:41:50.600 --> 01:41:59.680] now and I find myself researching some of the same things over and over. Areas I don't
[01:41:59.680 --> 01:42:06.360] deal with a lot. I go in and spend a lot of time researching, pulling out all the details
[01:42:06.360 --> 01:42:11.960] and then five years later that issue comes up again and I wanted to have them do the
[01:42:11.960 --> 01:42:17.600] same thing again. I remember parts of it but not well enough I have to go through this
[01:42:17.600 --> 01:42:27.840] process again. This questionnaire tool will give us a tool where we can immortalize our
[01:42:27.840 --> 01:42:35.840] research and there's enough of us out there. If we all start putting our research together
[01:42:35.840 --> 01:42:42.600] into one tool, it won't be long until we won't have to do much of this research anymore.
[01:42:42.600 --> 01:42:50.720] It won't be long until anybody can go to the questionnaire and all the pieces are in there.
[01:42:50.720 --> 01:43:01.200] I've looked at this and wondered what is the legal landscape going to look like when an
[01:43:01.200 --> 01:43:11.520] ordinary novice individual can have essentially complete access to all the law on a given
[01:43:11.520 --> 01:43:22.280] subject. We certainly are not going to have a million lawyers in the United States. A
[01:43:22.280 --> 01:43:32.680] million lawyers, the rest of the world has less than half a million. The entire world
[01:43:32.680 --> 01:43:40.960] in the United States has a million, 80,000 practicing lawyers that have about 11 million
[01:43:40.960 --> 01:43:53.720] lawyers all together. That is absurd. I think we'll fix that. I'm just wondering what the
[01:43:53.720 --> 01:44:00.760] landscape will look like. I'm an engineer and I know enough to know that things...
[01:44:00.760 --> 01:44:06.120] Nutritious food is real body armor. It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion and
[01:44:06.120 --> 01:44:10.800] feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs. Did you know the US government banned the
[01:44:10.800 --> 01:44:15.200] hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as a schedule one drug to
[01:44:15.200 --> 01:44:19.480] hide it behind the marijuana plant? People have been confused about this plant for over
[01:44:19.480 --> 01:44:25.440] 80 years and many still don't know what hemp is. So now you know hemp is not marijuana
[01:44:25.440 --> 01:44:31.120] and marijuana is not hemp. They are different varieties of the same species. Hemp USA.org
[01:44:31.120 --> 01:44:35.680] wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein
[01:44:35.680 --> 01:44:40.840] powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about. Remember, hemp protein powder
[01:44:40.840 --> 01:44:48.400] contains 53% protein. It's gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO and is loaded with nutrients. Call
[01:44:48.400 --> 01:44:58.160] 888-910-4367. 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at
[01:44:58.160 --> 01:45:10.280] hempusa.org. It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored
[01:45:10.280 --> 01:45:18.080] by Central Texas Gun Works. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a
[01:45:18.080 --> 01:45:24.200] chance to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes
[01:45:24.200 --> 01:45:30.800] Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's
[01:45:30.800 --> 01:45:37.080] ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar
[01:45:37.080 --> 01:45:44.120] and get 10 chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've
[01:45:44.120 --> 01:45:49.040] enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing
[01:45:49.040 --> 01:45:56.040] you the best quality programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:45:56.040 --> 01:46:25.040] Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:46:25.040 --> 01:46:31.200] We are back, Randy Kelton with our radio. I was saying when I ran off the cliff there
[01:46:31.200 --> 01:46:41.040] again that I'm enough of an engineer to know that when you design something and you're
[01:46:41.040 --> 01:46:46.960] in the process of the design and you try to predict where it will end up, you're always
[01:46:46.960 --> 01:46:58.440] wrong. I tell young engineers that engineers don't really design things. What they do is
[01:46:58.440 --> 01:47:05.400] they gather together parameters and then let the project dictate to them what the design
[01:47:05.400 --> 01:47:14.920] should look like. So we're putting together parameters and I'm trying to estimate what
[01:47:14.920 --> 01:47:22.000] the world will look like six months after we launch this project. We're going to have
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:29.200] a lot of really upset people. We're going to have people with a lot of money and a lot
[01:47:29.200 --> 01:47:38.520] of influence. If you were on the hard side of this project, how would you defend yourself
[01:47:38.520 --> 01:47:45.960] against it? If you're one of the ones profiting from the corruption, we spoke about California
[01:47:45.960 --> 01:47:52.760] earlier and I told someone that I'm going to refer to you, Ken. I told them that if
[01:47:52.760 --> 01:47:58.000] you're in California, the courts are going to pay for it. You're not going to win. They
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:07.440] are bought and paid for. The courts are going to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[01:48:07.440 --> 01:48:18.240] So what are these guys going to do when they get one client, one litigant after another
[01:48:18.240 --> 01:48:26.440] just pounding them, criminal charges, bar grievances, judicial conduct complaints? How
[01:48:26.440 --> 01:48:34.120] are they going to defend themselves? Randy, on that point, my concern is that being
[01:48:34.120 --> 01:48:39.120] that it's a police state, their knee jerk will be to ramp up the violence.
[01:48:39.120 --> 01:48:47.280] I've been doing this a long time and I've got a lot of things I tell people not to
[01:48:47.280 --> 01:48:54.920] do and I have credentials. Three dislocated ribs, two broken collar bones, chipped elbow
[01:48:54.920 --> 01:49:00.920] and tooth knocked out. I've been through the violence and I figured out pretty well a
[01:49:00.920 --> 01:49:11.800] way to get past the violent part. That's not what I'm so concerned about. How are they
[01:49:11.800 --> 01:49:22.520] going to use corrupt political influence to change the playing field when everybody has
[01:49:22.520 --> 01:49:30.440] access to this? They can't just go beat somebody up and make a change because there's nobody
[01:49:30.440 --> 01:49:36.520] to get to. This tool is going to be out of country for one thing, but it's also going
[01:49:36.520 --> 01:49:47.720] to be in the ether, out of any actual jurisdiction. Not something they can get a handle on. How
[01:49:47.720 --> 01:49:56.840] would you defend, if you're a corrupt judge, how would you maintain your corrupt income
[01:49:56.840 --> 01:50:06.080] in the face of this? I have no idea. I come up blank, but I know enough to know these
[01:50:06.080 --> 01:50:16.760] guys have figured out something. I know one thing they'll certainly try to do is put restrictions
[01:50:16.760 --> 01:50:24.720] on who can use this, but I don't know how they would do it because this is an individual
[01:50:24.720 --> 01:50:35.240] bringing you law. How are you going to tell him that you can't go get that law? It's really
[01:50:35.240 --> 01:50:42.760] kind of a rhetorical question at this point, but I always, you know, I'm a combat veteran
[01:50:42.760 --> 01:50:49.960] and there's a perspective you get in combat. You don't go into a fight just because you
[01:50:49.960 --> 01:50:57.200] can win it. If you win it, you have to have gained something because you use the resources
[01:50:57.200 --> 01:51:09.280] winning it and never get into a fight unless you have a backdoor out. You may assume something's
[01:51:09.280 --> 01:51:15.200] an easy fight. Maybe it is, maybe it's not, but when you're in combat, you don't get to
[01:51:15.200 --> 01:51:23.520] make two mistakes. So you got to cover your backside always. When you attack this guy,
[01:51:23.520 --> 01:51:32.840] how is he going to counter? What's he going to do? This is a big one. Just something to
[01:51:32.840 --> 01:51:38.560] think about. It's one of the things that as I get closer to being able to launch this
[01:51:38.560 --> 01:51:44.640] thing, it becomes more of a concern. I just want to be a step ahead of them. You know,
[01:51:44.640 --> 01:51:51.040] this is what we do with the processes that we demonstrate on the air here is, you know,
[01:51:51.040 --> 01:51:59.160] one of our rules is never ask public officials to do anything you actually want them to do
[01:51:59.160 --> 01:52:03.160] because you never do any, never ask public official to do anything this law does not
[01:52:03.160 --> 01:52:08.960] command him to do so that when they don't do it, then you get to cover. Always want
[01:52:08.960 --> 01:52:20.280] to be that step ahead. When we launch this product, I want to understand what to expect
[01:52:20.280 --> 01:52:27.080] them to do so that I can craft my response to what they're likely to do and be ready
[01:52:27.080 --> 01:52:35.960] for it when they do it. Well, that's my concern right now. Anyway, that's kind of, it's kind
[01:52:35.960 --> 01:52:42.000] of esoteric at the moment. I'm just trying to figure it out. What do you think? Now Scott
[01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:48.880] in Michigan, he's just going through some traffic issues and I've been asking for people
[01:52:48.880 --> 01:52:55.080] around the country who are researchers and I definitely want to bring Ken on and Scott,
[01:52:55.080 --> 01:53:04.080] if you can do this, if you can build me a set of documents for traffic, we can shut down
[01:53:04.080 --> 01:53:09.760] traffic enforcement in Michigan. Turns out it won't be hard.
[01:53:09.760 --> 01:53:14.320] Will you accept a subject matter jurisdiction challenge that's specific to Michigan or?
[01:53:14.320 --> 01:53:23.800] Yes, it's specific to Michigan and the claim doesn't always have to be winnable. I'm in
[01:53:23.800 --> 01:53:30.000] Tennessee and I just got a speeding ticket from a state trooper. If it had been a sheriff's
[01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:34.720] deputy, I'd have a really good claim against him, but it's a state trooper. He can enforce
[01:53:34.720 --> 01:53:44.160] the transportation code, but I got this argument. I'm almost certainly going to lose. I don't
[01:53:44.160 --> 01:53:57.320] care. Case law says that a state has an interest in traffic safety. So Ken, how familiar are
[01:53:57.320 --> 01:54:05.200] you with the right to travel argument? I'm very, very good with it.
[01:54:05.200 --> 01:54:11.520] Okay, good. I think you're going to like this. This is the problem we've been having
[01:54:11.520 --> 01:54:18.680] with right to travel and it took a while to get this focused. What the course are saying
[01:54:18.680 --> 01:54:30.440] is your right to travel is your right to travel from one state to another state. They're saying
[01:54:30.440 --> 01:54:39.000] that the state has a vested interest in public safety and therefore they can require that
[01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:49.760] a person secure a driver's license for the restricted purpose of ensuring competency
[01:54:49.760 --> 01:54:58.960] and knowledge of the traffic laws. It does not presume, does not create the presumption
[01:54:58.960 --> 01:55:06.320] that they are necessarily operating in commerce. It does not negate their right to move around
[01:55:06.320 --> 01:55:14.720] freely. So my argument is going to be that the complaint is insufficient on its face as
[01:55:14.720 --> 01:55:26.120] it fails to claim all of the necessary elements. The first element is evidence to show that
[01:55:26.120 --> 01:55:35.280] I fall within the statutory scheme, subject manageristic. In Texas, I can go after it
[01:55:35.280 --> 01:55:40.600] or if this had been a sheriff's deputy, I could go after it by showing that the sheriff's
[01:55:40.600 --> 01:55:52.160] deputy has no power to enforce the code at all. In Texas, oh God, I'm hammered. 701.001
[01:55:52.160 --> 01:56:00.800] says that the sheriff, I mean that the county commissioners court can appoint up to five
[01:56:00.800 --> 01:56:09.560] sheriff's deputies to act as traffic control officers but they have to be paid by the county
[01:56:09.560 --> 01:56:15.040] commissioners court and have to ride motorcycles. Just right there in the code, guys, I didn't
[01:56:15.040 --> 01:56:22.400] make that stuff up. The best I can figure out how this happened is Truman. Truman was
[01:56:22.400 --> 01:56:31.520] a road builder before he became president and he had the Corps of Engineers design our
[01:56:31.520 --> 01:56:36.720] current interstate highways because he was aghast at how many people were dying on the
[01:56:36.720 --> 01:56:42.240] highways. He said these roads were built for horses and carriages, not for high speed automobiles.
[01:56:42.240 --> 01:56:49.160] So he had these new roads designed. He had the federal government put together a model
[01:56:49.160 --> 01:56:53.720] of transportation code and got the states to adopt it. And he brought that to the sheriff's
[01:56:53.720 --> 01:56:59.400] and said, okay, you're the law enforcement agent for the county. We got this whole new
[01:56:59.400 --> 01:57:05.760] code for you to enforce and the sheriff told him go scratch. He said, at the time, it's
[01:57:05.760 --> 01:57:12.440] just after World War II and Americans are getting cars and really liking their cars
[01:57:12.440 --> 01:57:18.600] and having fun with them. They're not going to tolerate restrictions on their rights.
[01:57:18.600 --> 01:57:24.720] So when they implemented the code, they only implemented it against commercial drivers
[01:57:24.720 --> 01:57:29.440] because trucks were relatively new, poorly designed. The drivers didn't know what they
[01:57:29.440 --> 01:57:34.720] were doing. Most of the deaths on the highway were caused by commercial trucks and they
[01:57:34.720 --> 01:57:40.240] were damaging the highways, turn up bridges. So they passed this for commercial purposes
[01:57:40.240 --> 01:57:46.640] only. And then he told the sheriff to enforce it and he told him go scratch. He didn't have
[01:57:46.640 --> 01:57:52.120] funds to enforce that. If you want it enforced, you either have to fund me or you have to
[01:57:52.120 --> 01:57:56.320] come up with some other methodology. They come up with a new method, a different methodology.
[01:57:56.320 --> 01:58:04.640] It created state troopers. State police were created for the singular purpose of enforcing
[01:58:04.640 --> 01:58:15.920] transportation code. Texas code says the Texas Department of Public Safety shall not enforce
[01:58:15.920 --> 01:58:21.280] the criminal laws except at the request of and under the direction of local law enforcement
[01:58:21.280 --> 01:58:28.440] or traffic cops. Oh, I'm out of time. Ken, when we get off here, I'm going to call you
[01:58:28.440 --> 01:58:33.800] back. Scott, too, you want to hang around? Shane, I'm sorry we didn't get to you. Call
[01:58:33.800 --> 01:58:40.000] me back next Thursday. Randy Kelton, root of law radio. We'll be back next Thursday.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:45.680] Make sure you check out Eddie Craig on Monday on our traffic show. Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:45.680 --> 01:58:46.680] And good night.
[01:59:16.680 --> 01:59:23.800] or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:23.800 --> 01:59:30.480] 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.480 --> 01:59:35.040] This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament
[01:59:35.040 --> 01:59:51.520] recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.520 --> 02:00:07.080] Welcome for some truth. You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.