ROL_2018-11-09_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The Falling News Flash is brought to you by The Low Star of Lowdown, providing your deli
[00:06.000 --> 00:13.680]  bulletins for the commodities market, today's history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.680 --> 00:16.480]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:16.480 --> 00:23.120]  Markets for Thursday, the 8th of November, 2018, open with precious metals gold at $1,224.44,
[00:23.120 --> 00:35.280]  silver $14.45, platinum $875.80, palladium $1,138.55, rhodium $2,440, copper $2.72,
[00:35.280 --> 00:46.440]  oil Texas crude $61.67, Brent crude $72.07 a barrel, and cryptos bitcoin $6497.71, ethereum
[00:46.440 --> 00:59.920]  $214.53, XRP $51, bitcoin cash $592.53, EOS $5.57, Stellar $0.25, and Litecoin $53.49,
[00:59.920 --> 01:06.320]  a crypto coin.
[01:06.320 --> 01:12.560]  Today in History, the year 2002 UN Security Council Resolution 1441 is approved, forcing
[01:12.560 --> 01:16.160]  some of those saying to disarm or face serious consequences.
[01:16.160 --> 01:21.360]  Today in History.
[01:21.360 --> 01:26.280]  In recent news, a fine arts teacher at Wessendorf Middle School in Rosenberg, Texas apparently
[01:26.280 --> 01:30.520]  attempted suicide in his classroom during school hours, he was found unconscious by another
[01:30.520 --> 01:33.640]  staff member, he later died at a local hospital.
[01:33.640 --> 01:37.680]  The principal of the school, Sonia Sanzo, assured parents in an email that medical personnel
[01:37.680 --> 01:41.400]  responded before any students were exposed to the scene, and that the students were unaware
[01:41.400 --> 01:43.120]  of the emergency altogether.
[01:43.120 --> 01:46.600]  Investigators did determine his death to be a suicide, though they refused to expound
[01:46.600 --> 01:48.720]  on the exact details.
[01:48.720 --> 01:52.680]  Principal Sanzo did assure parents, however, that weapons were not on campus, and that
[01:52.680 --> 02:00.320]  students weren't in any danger.
[02:00.320 --> 02:05.320]  A Texas judge gave the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals custody of 110 animals,
[02:05.320 --> 02:11.160]  39 puppies, 35 adult dogs, 24 cats, 11 kittens, and a horse for being abused and neglected
[02:11.160 --> 02:16.160]  by their owners in Canton, Texas, ruling that over $31,000 is to be paid by the owners
[02:16.160 --> 02:21.000]  to cover the cost of the investigation, expert witnesses, and housing and care for the animals
[02:21.000 --> 02:23.160]  from the time of seizure until the hearing.
[02:23.160 --> 02:26.800]  The owners were arrested at the scene for child endangerment and animal cruelty and
[02:26.800 --> 02:34.120]  were booked into the Van Zandt County Jail.
[02:34.120 --> 02:37.880]  Thirteen people were killed at the Borderline Bar and Grill in Thousand Oaks, California,
[02:37.880 --> 02:42.240]  making it the deadliest mass shooting in the United States since 17 classmates and teachers
[02:42.240 --> 02:46.000]  were gunned down at the Parkland Florida School nine months ago.
[02:46.000 --> 02:49.400]  President Trump tweeted that he had been fully briefed on the terrible shooting, and God
[02:49.400 --> 02:56.400]  bless all the victims and families of the victims.
[02:56.400 --> 03:18.400]  This is Rick Brody with your Lowdown for November 8, 2018.
[03:18.400 --> 03:29.560]  Howdy, howdy, Randy Kelkin, Roodle Law Radio on this, the ninth day of November, 2018.
[03:29.560 --> 03:33.840]  This is our Friday for our info marathon.
[03:33.840 --> 03:38.520]  I did not have the phones on, but I have them on now.
[03:38.520 --> 03:46.240]  If you have any questions or comments, give us a call, 512-430-No, that's my phone number,
[03:46.240 --> 03:48.560]  512-646-1984.
[03:48.560 --> 03:54.360]  If you have any questions or comments, we'll have the phone lines open all night.
[03:54.360 --> 04:02.160]  The call boards are open at the moment, since I just turned them on, and I want to start
[04:02.160 --> 04:08.560]  out by talking about the Leal List project.
[04:08.560 --> 04:11.240]  We have been doing a lot of work on it.
[04:11.240 --> 04:18.800]  I've been going around to conventions and run around the country to try to drum up support
[04:18.800 --> 04:25.800]  and interest, and in doing these conventions, I've found some really interesting information
[04:25.800 --> 04:32.960]  that should facilitate us being able to get this thing launched.
[04:32.960 --> 04:40.600]  I'm hoping that within the next month, we will have an initial round of funding in place
[04:40.600 --> 04:48.080]  to get us set up for the next three months after that, a private sale that will get us
[04:48.080 --> 04:52.760]  fully funding, and we can begin to get this thing up and working.
[04:52.760 --> 04:57.080]  We do have a caller already, Ted from California, hello, Ted.
[04:57.080 --> 04:59.080]  What do you have for us today?
[04:59.080 --> 05:03.440]  Well, we're just a continuation of last night.
[05:03.440 --> 05:05.880]  Okay, okay, hold on.
[05:05.880 --> 05:14.720]  A lot of people may not have heard last night, so rather than start at the end of last night,
[05:14.720 --> 05:20.440]  kind of give us a quick update of where you're at, and then we'll move from there.
[05:20.440 --> 05:30.280]  Okay, so real short, I was four years ago now, charged with a crime involving my house
[05:30.280 --> 05:37.200]  of 33 years, and that was recording a quick clean deed from the house after it was foreclosed
[05:37.200 --> 05:46.320]  on, but also was back in my name, and it really all was going in civil court until nine months
[05:46.320 --> 05:55.400]  in, I had to sue one of the state court judges in federal court, and then a few weeks after
[05:55.400 --> 06:00.280]  that, the SWAT team and the sheriff's department and the local police all came out, threatened
[06:00.280 --> 06:08.400]  me out of my house and threw me in jail, basically under the jail for three days, and I've been
[06:08.400 --> 06:16.200]  defending it ever since, and, you know, currently I've been taking the steps of writing the
[06:16.200 --> 06:25.480]  criminal complaints and submitting them, and also the bar grievances, and also a court
[06:25.480 --> 06:32.800]  warrantal on one of the judges, I just sent up to the Attorney General of State of California,
[06:32.800 --> 06:38.800]  and I'm here in San Jose, California, and that's where we're at right now, and the
[06:38.800 --> 06:49.440]  last thing I did was I sent in a criminal complaint on a couple of people, and the district
[06:49.440 --> 06:54.680]  attorney opened that, you know, it was registered mail addressed to the foreman of the criminal
[06:54.680 --> 07:03.560]  grand jury, and specifically said on it, you know, for that person only, a deputy DA apparently
[07:03.560 --> 07:11.040]  opened that mail and sent me a letter back stating that, you know, a regular citizen
[07:11.040 --> 07:18.720]  doesn't have the right to contact the criminal grand jury, and only the district attorney
[07:18.720 --> 07:27.480]  has that privilege, and by doing so, that letter is an admission of mail tempering and
[07:27.480 --> 07:33.640]  secreting my complaints that were meant for the foreman of the criminal grand jury. I
[07:33.640 --> 07:38.600]  subsequently wrote out another criminal complaint, used the same process, mailed it in registered
[07:38.600 --> 07:46.120]  mail to the foreman of the criminal grand jury, and that's been about two weeks now,
[07:46.120 --> 07:51.560]  and haven't heard a thing, and of course I included the self-addressed stamped envelope
[07:51.560 --> 07:58.680]  with a letter explaining that, you know, just the second paper there just put the mark on
[07:58.680 --> 08:05.080]  it, foreman of the criminal grand jury that, you know, acknowledging receipt of my criminal
[08:05.080 --> 08:12.480]  complaint, and I have not received that, so I'm going to assume that the district attorney's
[08:12.480 --> 08:17.920]  office, again, tampered with my mail and is secreting the complaint that is now against
[08:17.920 --> 08:24.680]  that deputy DA and the district attorney himself, because I believe that district attorney instructed
[08:24.680 --> 08:32.720]  that deputy DA to return the previous complaint, and that's where we're at right now.
[08:32.720 --> 08:41.080]  So they got an email from you. Give us a little more detail about the QuoWaranto. That was
[08:41.080 --> 08:42.080]  interesting.
[08:42.080 --> 08:51.080]  Okay. Well, what's going on with the QuoWaranto? Again, this criminal charge I've been fighting
[08:51.080 --> 08:56.680]  for four years, and I bring up this going on four years because that's pretty abnormal
[08:56.680 --> 09:05.280]  in itself, but two years ago, I had probably 30 hearings, and all of a sudden out of nowhere,
[09:05.280 --> 09:12.560]  I'd always had the same judge. Out of nowhere, I'd go in, and at the time I was stuck with
[09:12.560 --> 09:18.440]  a public defender that I'd been, you know, screaming, but he doesn't represent me, and
[09:18.440 --> 09:23.880]  we walked into the courtroom, and this judge I've never seen before is on the bench, and
[09:23.880 --> 09:30.240]  he starts screaming and yelling at me right out of the gate. He wants a plea. I don't
[09:30.240 --> 09:39.120]  give him a plea, and I told him I need to talk to my lawyer. Obviously that was a tactic,
[09:39.120 --> 09:45.240]  but he entered a plea on my behalf of not guilty, and I objected. He told me I couldn't
[09:45.240 --> 09:51.240]  object. He didn't tell me what I was charged with. He didn't explain my rights. He didn't
[09:51.240 --> 09:55.240]  tell me I was entitled to a trial within 60 days, for example. He didn't ask me if I
[09:55.240 --> 10:01.480]  understood anything if I write, and I have the transcript, and so I'm very clear on this.
[10:01.480 --> 10:08.000]  He told me I was entitled to a preliminary hearing within 60 days, which is false. It's
[10:08.000 --> 10:13.320]  10 days, and he asked me twice if I waived that preliminary hearing. He didn't ask me
[10:13.320 --> 10:18.240]  if I waived my right to a speedy trial. He asked me if I waived the preliminary hearing.
[10:18.240 --> 10:27.240]  I'm going to have to make a motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial, but as I started
[10:27.240 --> 10:33.560]  to gather everything that had happened that day, and for all your folks that also know
[10:33.560 --> 10:38.400]  why did it go on so long, or why did it take me so long to come around with this, it's
[10:38.400 --> 10:45.320]  because I had two heart attacks as a result of everything they're doing to me. I wasn't
[10:45.320 --> 10:53.840]  physically able to defend myself, but what it came down to was I put in a request at
[10:53.840 --> 10:59.840]  the county level for that particular judge's oath of office, and they came back with an
[10:59.840 --> 11:09.880]  expired oath of office from 2001. I then learned that you can go to the Secretary of State
[11:09.880 --> 11:15.720]  in Sacramento and make the request, and that will give you a certified copy. So I paid
[11:15.720 --> 11:22.240]  the fee and sent him a request, and when I got back, from them, was a certified copy
[11:22.240 --> 11:31.760]  of an oath of office from 2001. That's when this judge was a judge. He retired about six
[11:31.760 --> 11:39.080]  or eight years ago, and they bring him in to, he's a ringer, they bring him in to mess people
[11:39.080 --> 11:45.240]  up on their cases. It's pretty obvious. They actually, he does it in several of the joining
[11:45.240 --> 11:50.560]  counties, not just Santa Clara County, they bring this guy in. But what's significant
[11:50.560 --> 11:56.080]  about it is he doesn't have a valid oath of office, and therefore he's not licensed and
[11:56.080 --> 12:03.080]  sure to bond it. And, you know, he's portraying that he's a judge, when in fact he's not.
[12:03.080 --> 12:12.200]  And so that's causing him to initiate a quote warrant code. And a quote warrant code is
[12:12.200 --> 12:15.680]  basically there's three things, and I don't have them in front of me, I apologize, but
[12:15.680 --> 12:20.880]  they are in that quote warrant code. There's three things that the Attorney General is
[12:20.880 --> 12:27.800]  to look at. One is that judge validly holding that office, and I think the answer to that
[12:27.800 --> 12:33.080]  is no. And I think one of the, you know, the fact that he doesn't have a valid oath of
[12:33.080 --> 12:39.800]  office is reason enough. But there's two other items. I don't remember what they are
[12:39.800 --> 12:44.560]  offhand, and the way this works is you submit this to the Attorney General, and I'm not
[12:44.560 --> 12:49.440]  going to go into all the little specific details that go with it. You do serve the judge as
[12:49.440 --> 12:54.720]  well, which I did. But they're supposed to, the Attorney General's office is supposed
[12:54.720 --> 13:04.720]  to respond within 14 days. And of course they did not. And I followed up. I found the person
[13:04.720 --> 13:11.160]  that's in charge of processing the quote warrant code. He's in Los Angeles. And I found out
[13:11.160 --> 13:18.040]  who his boss was, and about a month ago I wrote the boss saying I hadn't heard any, you
[13:18.040 --> 13:25.280]  know, I'm getting no response. And within hours I got an email from the guy responsible
[13:25.280 --> 13:32.120]  in Los Angeles stating that he'd never received my quote warrant code. And that's fair because
[13:32.120 --> 13:36.000]  it was sent for the Sacramento office, but you would think any office of the Attorney
[13:36.000 --> 13:41.400]  General knows where quote warrant codes go. I think anybody that's gone on the phone with
[13:41.400 --> 13:49.760]  me knows exactly who's responsible for them. So that's kind of BS. But at that point I
[13:49.760 --> 13:57.560]  believe that he was starting to process the quote warrant code. And it's been almost a
[13:57.560 --> 14:02.440]  month since that communication. So today I sent out another communication I think I copied
[14:02.440 --> 14:11.240]  you on, where I sent an email to his boss again explaining that I haven't, there hasn't
[14:11.240 --> 14:16.840]  been any response. And given all of my experience, what this is telling me is that there is
[14:16.840 --> 14:27.120]  a problem and that they're in the process of trying to cover this up. And that's the
[14:27.120 --> 14:28.280]  latest.
[14:28.280 --> 14:37.000]  So I pulled up a paper on quote warrant code in California. Let me read the first two paragraphs.
[14:37.000 --> 14:44.000]  Quote warrant code Latin for by what authority is a legal action most typically brought to
[14:44.000 --> 14:53.120]  resolve disputes concerning the right to hold public office or exercise franchise. California
[14:53.120 --> 14:58.480]  law provides that the action may be brought either by the Attorney General or by others
[14:58.480 --> 15:03.120]  acting with the consent of the Attorney General. Quote warrant code actions which in almost
[15:03.120 --> 15:08.720]  all instances provide the only method to challenge a claim of public office have proven to be
[15:08.720 --> 15:15.360]  an effective means of preserving the integrity of public office while minimizing the threat
[15:15.360 --> 15:20.320]  of unlimited litigation for those holding office. Courts have held that quote warrant
[15:20.320 --> 15:27.240]  code is a plain, speedy and adequate remedy for this purpose. So this is a purpose, this
[15:27.240 --> 15:37.760]  is a process by which you challenge a public official's right to hold a public office.
[15:37.760 --> 15:41.800]  In Texas quote warrant code means something slightly different. That's why a quote warrant
[15:41.800 --> 15:49.720]  code is an action to remove a public official from office and not necessarily just to challenge
[15:49.720 --> 15:54.160]  it. But generally that's what quote warrant code goes to. So that's interesting. It'll
[15:54.160 --> 16:05.720]  be interesting to see how that pans out. As to the criminal accusations you have filed,
[16:05.720 --> 16:13.040]  have you gotten past the prosecutor yet? I mean before you filed with the grand jury,
[16:13.040 --> 16:18.840]  you mentioned two sets when you filed with the grand jury and the prosecutor interfered
[16:18.840 --> 16:24.480]  and you filed again. Is there anything, any groups of complaints you filed other than
[16:24.480 --> 16:33.600]  those that this prosecutor has intercepted? Well, that's an interesting question because
[16:33.600 --> 16:40.120]  they did not send back all of my complaints. The ones, the two complaints against their
[16:40.120 --> 16:46.560]  two deputy DAs that I also filed bar grievances on, they did not send those back to me and
[16:46.560 --> 16:52.880]  they're not saying a word about them. And I have now sent everything up to the special
[16:52.880 --> 17:05.320]  agent in charge of the FBI in San Francisco. Did you send it to him by name? It's the 2018
[17:05.320 --> 17:10.760]  Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun
[17:10.760 --> 17:17.960]  Works. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance to
[17:17.960 --> 17:24.600]  win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR
[17:24.600 --> 17:31.120]  15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[17:31.120 --> 17:37.080]  Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get ten
[17:37.080 --> 17:43.880]  chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the
[17:43.880 --> 17:49.560]  shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality
[17:49.560 --> 17:55.640]  programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Go to
[17:55.640 --> 18:02.920]  LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today. Are you being harassed by debt collectors
[18:02.920 --> 18:08.120]  with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael
[18:08.120 --> 18:13.360]  Miras Proven Method. Michael Miras has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors
[18:13.360 --> 18:18.640]  and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win
[18:18.640 --> 18:24.000]  in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phones, mail,
[18:24.000 --> 18:28.440]  or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out
[18:28.440 --> 18:33.720]  of your credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go
[18:33.720 --> 18:39.600]  away? The Michael Miras Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.600 --> 18:45.080]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:45.080 --> 18:50.400]  and click on the blue Michael Miras banner or email Michael Miras at yahoo.com. That's
[18:50.400 --> 18:59.840]  the ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.840 --> 19:25.120]  now.
[19:29.840 --> 19:51.080]  Okay, we are back Randy Kelton with our radio on 9th day of November 2018 and we're talking
[19:51.080 --> 19:57.600]  to Ted in California and Ted we ran off the cliff there while we were on the break I looked
[19:57.600 --> 20:06.000]  up depraved heart murder in California because I'm thinking about you having a heart attack
[20:06.000 --> 20:18.760]  in court and the court continuing to prosecute you while you're having this issue and what
[20:18.760 --> 20:25.920]  I'm finding here is not depraved heart but depraved indifference, depraved heart murder
[20:25.920 --> 20:30.960]  in the United States law, depraved heart murder also known as depraved indifference murder
[20:30.960 --> 20:37.560]  is a type of murder where an individual acts with a depraved indifference to human life.
[20:37.560 --> 20:46.080]  I'm thinking depraved indifference assault or depraved indifference attempted murder
[20:46.080 --> 20:51.320]  you're in the process of having a heart attack and that's placing your life at risk and the
[20:51.320 --> 20:59.880]  judge and prosecutor continue to prosecute you without providing assistance I would call
[20:59.880 --> 21:05.000]  that depraved heart assault or depraved indifference assault.
[21:05.000 --> 21:12.080]  When the heart attack started one I had a doctor's order prescription that said I am
[21:12.080 --> 21:16.080]  not to be in court and the judge threatened they would come arrest me if I didn't come
[21:16.080 --> 21:21.640]  to court I went to court while she's on the bench she took a break she's in her office
[21:21.640 --> 21:26.800]  in the back and I started having a heart attack 911 was called nobody would give me an aspirin
[21:26.800 --> 21:31.560]  or nothing and she came out of her office went back on the bench and continued to prosecute
[21:31.560 --> 21:33.360]  me.
[21:33.360 --> 21:39.440]  That should get a depraved heart assault charge.
[21:39.440 --> 21:49.840]  Depraved heart sounds so ugly that should get a assault against the judge I mean it's
[21:49.840 --> 21:58.520]  not funny at all it's barbaric and it's unbelievable have you filed against the judge for that?
[21:58.520 --> 22:00.160]  No.
[22:00.160 --> 22:08.640]  Time to time to do that okay that one would be that is so ugly sounding.
[22:08.640 --> 22:19.680]  But at the end of the day everything is political and it's not your actions or your complaints
[22:19.680 --> 22:24.560]  that's going to harm them or frighten them.
[22:24.560 --> 22:30.600]  What frightens them is the political cannon fodder you could generate for their political
[22:30.600 --> 22:34.560]  opponents do you know when this judge is up for election next?
[22:34.560 --> 22:39.320]  I don't know and you know that's one of the problems out here most of these judges get
[22:39.320 --> 22:46.920]  appointed and when they go up for re-election if there's automatic that they get re-elected.
[22:46.920 --> 22:54.040]  Well it may not be automatic if you raise some really ugly sounding issues that a potential
[22:54.040 --> 23:01.880]  opponent could use as cannon fodder against the judge it's all politics at the end of
[23:01.880 --> 23:11.600]  the day and the higher up you are the more people below you want your job it certainly
[23:11.600 --> 23:22.200]  wouldn't hurt to charge her with depraved indifference assault.
[23:22.200 --> 23:29.240]  If he wouldn't even let them give you aspirin no for aspirin they wouldn't give it to me
[23:29.240 --> 23:35.800]  they forced you to come when doctors ordered you not to that should get depraved hard.
[23:35.800 --> 23:42.360]  The doctor's letter said I was subject to sudden death by any stressors.
[23:42.360 --> 23:47.680]  She said the letter was vague and said if I didn't get in court right now that they
[23:47.680 --> 23:53.920]  were going to issue an arrest warrant then you definitely should go after her for that.
[23:53.920 --> 23:59.760]  These are not the things we should allow our public officials to do with impunity.
[23:59.760 --> 24:05.360]  And criminal complaints you know that's ugly enough that the judge is going to have to
[24:05.360 --> 24:12.680]  look at the possibility of that getting forced before a grand jury and a grand jury is not
[24:12.680 --> 24:16.120]  likely to be very happy about that.
[24:16.120 --> 24:25.080]  Well let's also take the fact that this is a fake fault charge it's a white collar crime
[24:25.080 --> 24:32.440]  if it was a crime there's no violence I'm not a threat to the public and I was out
[24:32.440 --> 24:44.920]  on bail and there was no necessity here there was nothing that was a good cause for the judge's
[24:44.920 --> 24:51.560]  action demanding my appearance against doctors orders and by the way I said doctors prescription
[24:51.560 --> 24:57.720]  because a doctor is a higher authority than a judge in California and when a doctor writes
[24:57.720 --> 25:04.560]  a letter that's the letter that I had presented on my behalf that is a doctor's prescription
[25:04.560 --> 25:11.360]  it has a higher authority than that judge has and that judge really screwed up.
[25:11.360 --> 25:18.960]  You should also consider suing the judge personally I it's all you know it's all in the worst
[25:18.960 --> 25:27.720]  once the criminal case is dealt with make sure the clock doesn't run on you okay well I
[25:27.720 --> 25:33.240]  I fear that if the clock is running it may have already ran you know it may it may not
[25:33.240 --> 25:43.440]  if the judge is still in office there is there's a case in Illinois where I'm trying to remember
[25:43.440 --> 25:50.200]  that you'd probably recognize the case if I could think of it but the corrupt judge
[25:50.200 --> 25:57.360]  is in office for 20 years and the feds did a sting on them and went after the judge
[25:57.360 --> 26:01.440]  for everything he had done for 20 years and he complained that statute of limitations
[26:01.440 --> 26:06.960]  had run and what the fed said that because the judge was still in office he was in a
[26:06.960 --> 26:13.720]  position to use his office to shield himself from the consequences of his bad behavior
[26:13.720 --> 26:20.840]  therefore the clock did not start to run until he got out of office so they could go back
[26:20.840 --> 26:31.120]  to full 20 years you can use that against this judge you know it's perception is everything
[26:31.120 --> 26:38.400]  this one you like the stuff that really sounds ugly well but it's not only it sounds ugly
[26:38.400 --> 26:47.160]  it is ugly after that event four days later I was at a friend's house and death came over
[26:47.160 --> 26:53.560]  me I thought that was it and you when you're messing with somebody's heart you know sometimes
[26:53.560 --> 27:00.800]  you do something and it takes it set a things in motion and that's exactly what happened
[27:00.800 --> 27:07.360]  I literally four days after this event there was a moment where I just said this event
[27:07.360 --> 27:14.880]  I'm gone I just you you just know everything just leaves you and that that happened to
[27:14.880 --> 27:21.800]  me four days after this this happened and so she she almost killed me
[27:21.800 --> 27:28.880]  and that should get a charge and it well when I say it sounds ugly even if something's horribly
[27:28.880 --> 27:35.120]  ugly if it doesn't sound ugly it doesn't tend to get as much attention this one there's
[27:35.120 --> 27:42.400]  no way to look at this this doesn't sound really really ugly the doctor wrote a prescription
[27:42.400 --> 27:49.040]  from preventing you from going to court because it would cause our could cause a heart attack
[27:49.040 --> 27:54.400]  she forced you to court it did cause a heart attack that's causation that's direct causation
[27:54.400 --> 28:05.000]  well it didn't just say a heart attack it said it could cause my sudden death so that's
[28:05.000 --> 28:12.640]  even better it didn't cause sudden death but came close and you could call that attempted
[28:12.640 --> 28:23.440]  murder well I'll get that one written up it's been it's been there it's been one that we're
[28:23.440 --> 28:31.040]  going to write and we haven't written it I was hoping complaints like that is what will
[28:31.040 --> 28:38.000]  get you protected when you're going after a high level judge with really high level
[28:38.000 --> 28:49.200]  charges anybody says anything to you that you can in any way to interpret as a threat
[28:49.200 --> 28:56.480]  for me that gets a 911 call once I've hammered the high level judge everything everybody
[28:56.480 --> 29:02.160]  does I blame on the high level judge whether you had anything to do with it or not let
[29:02.160 --> 29:11.560]  him explain it to grand jury and my favorite one is when the local policeman was trying
[29:11.560 --> 29:17.440]  to stop me from using a little propane torch because we had a fire ban on and I accused
[29:17.440 --> 29:22.360]  the district judge sending him down there to harass me because I filed a criminal complaint
[29:22.360 --> 29:29.560]  against the district judge and the officer when he found out I was just joking with him
[29:29.560 --> 29:37.240]  said he saw his whole career pass before his eyes this will terrify him hang on not running
[29:37.240 --> 29:44.840]  off cliff this time Randy kelton wheel of law radio I call in number 5126461984 we have
[29:44.840 --> 29:49.880]  a full board so if you can't get in wait till somebody drops off and then call in you should
[29:49.880 --> 30:05.960]  be able to get on board we'll be right back do you rise with the roosters or hook with
[30:05.960 --> 30:11.320]  the owls either way it's your brain that determines what time of day you're at your best Dr.
[30:11.320 --> 30:28.040]  in all Brackton I'll be back with new research on how the clock affects brain function next
[30:28.040 --> 30:44.520]  so protect your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy
[30:44.520 --> 30:59.200]  are you a morning person or a night owl researchers say our brains determine the answer they stand
[30:59.200 --> 31:08.200]  volunteers for muscle strength and the excitability of pathways through their nervous systems they
[31:08.200 --> 31:15.360]  can't get out of the way so early birds go easy on those night owls sleeping in is more
[31:15.360 --> 31:19.840]  a function of biology than will power and once they clear the sleep from their eyes
[31:19.840 --> 31:25.240]  night owls grow stronger with each passing moment so they're on a continual upswing
[31:25.240 --> 31:41.560]  the world's most private search engine did you know there are three million edible food
[31:41.560 --> 32:04.500]  particles
[32:04.500 --> 32:08.500]  the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:08.500 --> 32:12.500]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend
[32:12.500 --> 32:16.500]  our own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right
[32:16.500 --> 32:20.500]  to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.500 --> 32:24.500]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.500 --> 32:28.500]  our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with rule of law
[32:28.500 --> 32:32.500]  radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[32:32.500 --> 32:36.500]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get
[32:36.500 --> 32:40.500]  your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering
[32:40.500 --> 32:44.500]  your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, the Texas Transportation
[32:44.500 --> 32:48.500]  Code, the Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of
[32:48.500 --> 32:52.500]  research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights
[32:52.500 --> 32:56.500]  with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together
[32:56.500 --> 33:02.500]  we can have pre-society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.500 --> 33:06.500]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[33:06.500 --> 33:12.500]  at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:12.500 --> 33:20.500]  Yeah, I got the warrant. And I'm going to solve them.
[33:20.500 --> 33:26.500]  Okay.
[33:26.500 --> 33:32.500]  So, like Randy Kelton, rule of law radio on this Friday
[33:32.500 --> 33:38.500]  and not to be over tonight. We're talking
[33:38.500 --> 33:42.500]  with Eddie to
[33:42.500 --> 33:48.500]  where he had their prosecution review.
[33:48.500 --> 33:52.500]  One more time. Where he
[33:52.500 --> 33:56.500]  did the prosecutor's case against you.
[33:56.500 --> 34:00.500]  Well, I have a trial set for December
[34:00.500 --> 34:04.500]  3rd.
[34:04.500 --> 34:08.500]  Did you receive all of your discovery?
[34:08.500 --> 34:12.500]  No. And I'm going to put an emotion to set aside
[34:12.500 --> 34:16.500]  or vacate the trial date based on
[34:16.500 --> 34:20.500]  the prosecution's resistance to giving me discovery.
[34:20.500 --> 34:24.500]  Specifically, exculpatory discovery
[34:24.500 --> 34:28.500]  individuals in Los Angeles that are part of this.
[34:28.500 --> 34:32.500]  And I believe they're keeping that information from me
[34:32.500 --> 34:36.500]  because it exonerates me. But we really don't even
[34:36.500 --> 34:40.500]  have to go there Randy. The day
[34:40.500 --> 34:44.500]  of the alleged offense, the property
[34:44.500 --> 34:46.500]  secretary showed to be in my name.
[34:46.500 --> 34:50.500]  Subsequent to that, what I've learned is that
[34:50.500 --> 34:54.500]  if you look at black law dictionary definition of a quick claim deed,
[34:54.500 --> 34:58.500]  it actually says in the definition that if you have
[34:58.500 --> 35:02.500]  bad title, or you
[35:02.500 --> 35:06.500]  don't know if your title is good or bad, but it says if you have bad title,
[35:06.500 --> 35:10.500]  you record a quick claim deed. And it only
[35:10.500 --> 35:14.500]  transfers interest you have, if you have none, it transfers none.
[35:14.500 --> 35:18.500]  In the future, if you don't
[35:18.500 --> 35:22.500]  have any interest at the time of the transfer, but you
[35:22.500 --> 35:26.500]  get interest in the future, then whatever you transferred that day
[35:26.500 --> 35:30.500]  transfers. So the definition itself,
[35:30.500 --> 35:34.500]  it makes it almost a legal impossibility that this
[35:34.500 --> 35:38.500]  could be a false document. Unless it was scored.
[35:38.500 --> 35:42.500]  Yeah, well, it could only go to fraud
[35:42.500 --> 35:46.500]  and you can't fraudulently
[35:46.500 --> 35:50.500]  transfer anything but what you have with the quick claim.
[35:50.500 --> 35:54.500]  You can't fraudulently transfer someone else's
[35:54.500 --> 35:58.500]  rights or property with a quick claim. You could only transfer your own.
[35:58.500 --> 36:02.500]  And they're saying that it's a felony
[36:02.500 --> 36:06.500]  for you to transfer your right to a property of something else,
[36:06.500 --> 36:10.500]  or something or someone else.
[36:10.500 --> 36:14.500]  Did they come up with any codes supporting that, or did they make
[36:14.500 --> 36:18.500]  it just a general accusation?
[36:18.500 --> 36:22.500]  They made a general accusation. We have had a preliminary hearing
[36:22.500 --> 36:26.500]  where they did not
[36:26.500 --> 36:30.500]  they spoke of what happened after the foreclosure, about
[36:30.500 --> 36:34.500]  a month after the foreclosure, two documents were recorded
[36:34.500 --> 36:38.500]  by individuals in Los Angeles and one was a
[36:38.500 --> 36:42.500]  substitution of trustee and the other document was a rescission of
[36:42.500 --> 36:46.500]  sale. Those were acted on
[36:46.500 --> 36:50.500]  and the county
[36:50.500 --> 36:54.500]  office sent me notice of potential tax bill and so on.
[36:54.500 --> 36:58.500]  Looked correct to me and again
[36:58.500 --> 37:02.500]  the property was in my name but here's the thing, even if the property was not
[37:02.500 --> 37:06.500]  in my name, I've gone to 20 lawyers and every one of them told me
[37:06.500 --> 37:10.500]  this is not a crime. The really good one, about
[37:10.500 --> 37:14.500]  two or three of them, they looked me in the eye and they say, who did you
[37:14.500 --> 37:18.500]  piss off? Because this is not a crime.
[37:18.500 --> 37:22.500]  Yeah, clearly it's not criminal. Now that you're going back after them criminally
[37:22.500 --> 37:26.500]  that
[37:26.500 --> 37:30.500]  might give them reason to want to be more cautious.
[37:30.500 --> 37:34.500]  I don't dig so ready. Look, California
[37:34.500 --> 37:38.500]  has turned into a mess. It's happened over a long
[37:38.500 --> 37:42.500]  period of time. I've got some roots in Texas. I lived in Houston
[37:42.500 --> 37:46.500]  for three years and I've been around a little bit but
[37:46.500 --> 37:50.500]  I've got to tell you this county is out of control, the state
[37:50.500 --> 37:54.500]  is out of control but this county specifically, all these criminal
[37:54.500 --> 37:58.500]  complaints that I filed, it seems like they don't even care
[37:58.500 --> 38:02.500]  they're ignoring everything and I think they're trying to...
[38:02.500 --> 38:06.500]  Okay, listen, when you start filing criminal complaints, the last thing
[38:06.500 --> 38:10.500]  they're going to do is come and tell you that this is a problem
[38:10.500 --> 38:14.500]  for them. They absolutely want you
[38:14.500 --> 38:18.500]  to think that they mean nothing.
[38:18.500 --> 38:22.500]  I assure you they mean something.
[38:22.500 --> 38:26.500]  How would you like to play Russian roulette?
[38:26.500 --> 38:30.500]  Okay, we take a 14 blanks
[38:30.500 --> 38:34.500]  and one live cartridge, shuffle them all up, stick them in a clip
[38:34.500 --> 38:38.500]  who wants to take the first shot? Criminal complaints
[38:38.500 --> 38:42.500]  against public officials is like playing Russian roulette with their career
[38:42.500 --> 38:46.500]  and their liberty. And the more corrupted
[38:46.500 --> 38:50.500]  jurisdiction is, the more it frightens them. They're not
[38:50.500 --> 38:54.500]  afraid of you. They're afraid of their political enemies getting this and using
[38:54.500 --> 38:58.500]  it against them. And they know their political enemies
[38:58.500 --> 39:02.500]  would use it against them because they had to use it against their enemies.
[39:02.500 --> 39:06.500]  So when you start filing criminal complaints and walk them up
[39:06.500 --> 39:10.500]  the system all the way up the top and then you move out of there and go into the fed
[39:10.500 --> 39:14.500]  California doesn't own
[39:14.500 --> 39:18.500]  all of the federal courts. And the counties don't
[39:18.500 --> 39:22.500]  own all the federal courts. Once you get out of the state courts into the fed
[39:22.500 --> 39:26.500]  they start getting nervous. They're not going to
[39:26.500 --> 39:30.500]  let you know it. They're going to do everything they can to hide it from you.
[39:30.500 --> 39:34.500]  Well it's pretty bad here Randy because the fed court here in San Jose
[39:34.500 --> 39:38.500]  is all judges that were formerly
[39:38.500 --> 39:42.500]  state court judges right here in San Jose. Okay, are they mostly
[39:42.500 --> 39:46.500]  Democrats? That's of course!
[39:46.500 --> 39:50.500]  Okay, keep in mind we have a Republican president
[39:50.500 --> 39:54.500]  who really, really doesn't like the Democrats.
[39:54.500 --> 39:58.500]  And especially when it comes to
[39:58.500 --> 40:02.500]  US attorneys. He has every US attorney's resignation
[40:02.500 --> 40:06.500]  in his hand. And when you start hammering
[40:06.500 --> 40:10.500]  the US attorney for not prosecuting public officials
[40:10.500 --> 40:14.500]  and you take the US attorney in California to
[40:14.500 --> 40:18.500]  the Attorney General in DC and get DC looking back at this
[40:18.500 --> 40:22.500]  US attorney he is not going to be a happy camper.
[40:22.500 --> 40:26.500]  So he has to consider, am I willing to throw
[40:26.500 --> 40:30.500]  myself under the bus to protect these local
[40:30.500 --> 40:34.500]  officials? And the local officials have to consider
[40:34.500 --> 40:38.500]  is that US attorney willing to throw himself under the bus to protect
[40:38.500 --> 40:42.500]  us?
[40:42.500 --> 40:46.500]  Well, I'll tell you
[40:46.500 --> 40:50.500]  the most, one thing that's been effective is the complaints to the
[40:50.500 --> 40:54.500]  bar. They are investigating this.
[40:54.500 --> 40:58.500]  And
[40:58.500 --> 41:02.500]  of
[41:02.500 --> 41:06.500]  court in some light
[41:06.500 --> 41:10.500]  in
[41:10.500 --> 41:14.500]  federal
[41:14.500 --> 41:18.500]  court.
[41:18.500 --> 41:22.500]  Easy, easy somebody to accept
[41:22.500 --> 41:26.500]  the after.
[41:26.500 --> 41:30.500]  Okay, you can get all of that because you're breaking up. And I think it's
[41:30.500 --> 41:34.500]  a digital type of breakup that I don't think it's my
[41:34.500 --> 41:38.500]  cell phone signal.
[41:38.500 --> 41:42.500]  Yes, I couldn't swore on that.
[41:42.500 --> 41:46.500]  The next only way to
[41:46.500 --> 41:50.500]  stay after them.
[41:50.500 --> 41:54.500]  Okay.
[41:54.500 --> 41:58.500]  Well, what's my next step?
[41:58.500 --> 42:02.500]  Okay, say that again. Did you say
[42:02.500 --> 42:06.500]  what's your next step? Yeah, who do I put
[42:06.500 --> 42:10.500]  these complaints with to next? Okay, you've given to the
[42:10.500 --> 42:14.500]  special agent in charge
[42:14.500 --> 42:18.500]  of the FBI.
[42:18.500 --> 42:22.500]  In San Francisco.
[42:22.500 --> 42:26.500]  Okay, when you don't hear from him, then you
[42:26.500 --> 42:30.500]  file against the SAC with the US attorney.
[42:30.500 --> 42:34.500]  And when the US attorney,
[42:34.500 --> 42:38.500]  when you don't hear from him, you file against the US attorney with the grand jury,
[42:38.500 --> 42:42.500]  with your federal grand jury.
[42:42.500 --> 42:46.500]  And when you don't hear from them, then you file against all of them in Washington, D.C.
[42:46.500 --> 42:50.500]  with the attorney general there.
[42:50.500 --> 42:54.500]  And it's all about black in our eyes.
[42:54.500 --> 42:58.500]  When you move into the feds, the politics is more important.
[42:58.500 --> 43:02.500]  You got a blue state with a red president.
[43:02.500 --> 43:06.500]  When you start bringing complaints to the attorney general
[43:06.500 --> 43:10.500]  in D.C. about
[43:10.500 --> 43:14.500]  Democratic public officials in California,
[43:14.500 --> 43:18.500]  these Democratic officials in California are going to get real
[43:18.500 --> 43:22.500]  uncomfortable. And when they start getting uncomfortable,
[43:22.500 --> 43:26.500]  they're going to make the state actors even more uncomfortable.
[43:26.500 --> 43:30.500]  And I can almost assure you
[43:30.500 --> 43:34.500]  these guys will huff and puff and rail in righteousness and
[43:34.500 --> 43:38.500]  submission until they get to the courthouse steps
[43:38.500 --> 43:42.500]  and that's when they'll drop it because they are not going to want to come into court
[43:42.500 --> 43:46.500]  with what they got.
[43:46.500 --> 43:50.500]  This is what they do.
[43:50.500 --> 43:54.500]  They fight up to the last minute, but when they get to the courthouse steps
[43:54.500 --> 43:58.500]  and they have to go into court and
[43:58.500 --> 44:02.500]  purple.
[44:02.500 --> 44:06.500]  In California, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering
[44:06.500 --> 44:10.500]  excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:10.500 --> 44:14.500]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[44:14.500 --> 44:18.500]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[44:18.500 --> 44:22.500]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top
[44:22.500 --> 44:26.500]  accredited metal dealers and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking for,
[44:26.500 --> 44:30.500]  we can find it. In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products
[44:30.500 --> 44:34.500]  beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst. We also offer one-world way,
[44:34.500 --> 44:38.500]  Mountain House storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above
[44:38.500 --> 44:42.500]  wholesale and more. We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept big coins
[44:42.500 --> 44:46.500]  as payment. Call us at 512-646-6404.
[44:46.500 --> 44:50.500]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, sweet A, about a half mile south
[44:50.500 --> 44:54.500]  of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturdays 10-2.
[44:54.500 --> 44:58.500]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullying.com or call 512-646-6404.
[44:58.500 --> 45:02.500]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:02.500 --> 45:06.500]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:06.500 --> 45:10.500]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course
[45:10.500 --> 45:14.500]  that will show you how in 24 hours,
[45:14.500 --> 45:18.500]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be
[45:18.500 --> 45:22.500]  doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.500 --> 45:26.500]  Thousands have won with our step by step course
[45:26.500 --> 45:30.500]  and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed
[45:30.500 --> 45:34.500]  attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.500 --> 45:38.500]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.500 --> 45:42.500]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American
[45:42.500 --> 45:46.500]  courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[45:46.500 --> 45:50.500]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics,
[45:50.500 --> 45:54.500]  and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[45:54.500 --> 45:58.500]  and click on the banner or call toll free
[45:58.500 --> 46:24.500]  66 law easy.
[46:24.500 --> 46:28.500]  Always, I must be careful what I'm wishing for
[46:28.500 --> 46:32.500]  when I'm hungry, I like to move.
[46:32.500 --> 46:36.500]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton
[46:36.500 --> 46:40.500]  Rule of Law Radio and we're talking to Ted in California
[46:40.500 --> 46:44.500]  and before we went out you asked what you do next. I would suggest you
[46:44.500 --> 46:48.500]  go after this judge for depraved indifference
[46:48.500 --> 46:52.500]  and assault or aggravated assault.
[46:52.500 --> 46:56.500]  She deliberately placed your life in jeopardy.
[46:56.500 --> 47:00.500]  That one really sounds ugly. That will be
[47:00.500 --> 47:04.500]  hard for higher level officials to try to defend
[47:04.500 --> 47:08.500]  because it's going to stain them with the bad
[47:08.500 --> 47:12.500]  behavior of this judge. Perceptions
[47:12.500 --> 47:16.500]  everything. You make it look good and ugly. You give them reason.
[47:16.500 --> 47:20.500]  Give these higher level officials reason to tell these lower level
[47:20.500 --> 47:24.500]  officials you guys better make this go away because we're not crawling
[47:24.500 --> 47:28.500]  under the bus with you. Does that make sense Ted?
[47:28.500 --> 47:32.500]  Yes.
[47:32.500 --> 47:36.500]  So I have a lot of work to do. I really appreciate it Randy.
[47:36.500 --> 47:40.500]  I've got this clear in my mind what I need to do.
[47:40.500 --> 47:44.500]  And I do realize this is a lot of work.
[47:44.500 --> 47:48.500]  I've been there myself and it's hard when you're the one
[47:48.500 --> 47:52.500]  that's coming after. It's really hard.
[47:52.500 --> 47:56.500]  And there are very few that have the strength to
[47:56.500 --> 48:00.500]  fight this through and I'm glad you're still hanging in there with them.
[48:00.500 --> 48:04.500]  You got all my respect.
[48:04.500 --> 48:08.500]  Well and again I appreciate our offer of conversation.
[48:08.500 --> 48:12.500]  I'll tell you it saved my life. The fact that you told me
[48:12.500 --> 48:16.500]  that you've been through this and
[48:16.500 --> 48:20.500]  it's the worst possible thing that you could ever go through even.
[48:20.500 --> 48:24.500]  You prefer to go into live battle in a war
[48:24.500 --> 48:28.500]  than do this. That really, really helped me quite a lot.
[48:28.500 --> 48:32.500]  Well good and I do
[48:32.500 --> 48:36.500]  appreciate how hard this is. You know in combat they're coming after
[48:36.500 --> 48:40.500]  you and you're this reactive. Here you've got this
[48:40.500 --> 48:44.500]  overbidding pressure on you all
[48:44.500 --> 48:48.500]  the time and it's difficult.
[48:48.500 --> 48:52.500]  When they were coming after me and I had to write documents
[48:52.500 --> 48:56.500]  I had to struggle just to pick up
[48:56.500 --> 49:00.500]  a piece of paper and work on it because I wanted to just go hide.
[49:00.500 --> 49:04.500]  It was difficult.
[49:04.500 --> 49:08.500]  So I appreciate how hard this is. Keep it up and we'll give you
[49:08.500 --> 49:12.500]  all the help we can. I appreciate it Randy and I'll tell you
[49:12.500 --> 49:16.500]  it's really difficult because when you haven't done anything wrong
[49:16.500 --> 49:20.500]  and they're making a fake crime, when you are innocent
[49:20.500 --> 49:24.500]  I don't think there's anything more horrible that can happen when you're innocent.
[49:24.500 --> 49:28.500]  Had I actually done something I would accept a punishment.
[49:28.500 --> 49:32.500]  Again I appreciate this radio show
[49:32.500 --> 49:36.500]  so much and I encourage everybody that can
[49:36.500 --> 49:40.500]  to please donate and when I'm in a position
[49:40.500 --> 49:44.500]  I will be donating myself and we got to keep this going.
[49:44.500 --> 49:48.500]  Okay thank you Ted.
[49:48.500 --> 49:52.500]  Okay now we're going to go to Ralph in Texas. Hello Ralph.
[49:52.500 --> 49:56.500]  Hello Randy how are you?
[49:56.500 --> 50:00.500]  I am good. What do you have for us today?
[50:00.500 --> 50:04.500]  I have a due process question I think.
[50:04.500 --> 50:08.500]  In the criminal cases
[50:08.500 --> 50:12.500]  of traffic, this is in Texas, when you go in
[50:12.500 --> 50:16.500]  and they're charging you with the transportation code violation
[50:16.500 --> 50:20.500]  they make what Eddie calls the irrebutable presumption
[50:20.500 --> 50:24.500]  that you're in transportation.
[50:24.500 --> 50:28.500]  Are you familiar with that I think right? Yes.
[50:28.500 --> 50:32.500]  Okay I'll tell you my folks.
[50:32.500 --> 50:36.500]  Okay my question is let's say that
[50:36.500 --> 50:40.500]  a person was arrested for a failure to identify
[50:40.500 --> 50:44.500]  and they decided they didn't like that so they decided to sue civilly.
[50:44.500 --> 50:48.500]  In the civil court the defendants say
[50:48.500 --> 50:52.500]  well yes you can't be arrested for a failure to identify
[50:52.500 --> 50:56.500]  but this person could have been arrested for not producing a license on demand.
[50:56.500 --> 51:00.500]  So they're making the presumption that you're in transportation.
[51:00.500 --> 51:04.500]  Now how should...
[51:04.500 --> 51:08.500]  not exactly true.
[51:08.500 --> 51:12.500]  If you have a driver's license
[51:12.500 --> 51:16.500]  you have entered into a contract
[51:16.500 --> 51:20.500]  wherein you agreed to produce that license on demand.
[51:20.500 --> 51:24.500]  Doesn't say anything about transportation.
[51:24.500 --> 51:28.500]  Okay so if a person doesn't have a license
[51:28.500 --> 51:32.500]  and they're saying that the person could have been arrested for transportation
[51:32.500 --> 51:36.500]  code violations and you come back like so they do
[51:36.500 --> 51:40.500]  that in a motion to dismiss hey we didn't do anything wrong because he could have been arrested for
[51:40.500 --> 51:44.500]  transportation code violations and you come back with prove it.
[51:44.500 --> 51:48.500]  And the judge comes back with okay I'm going to go with the defendants
[51:48.500 --> 51:52.500]  on this you know you're subject to a transportation code violation.
[51:52.500 --> 51:56.500]  What I'm wondering is since the judge didn't entertain the idea
[51:56.500 --> 52:00.500]  allowing the person to produce evidence
[52:00.500 --> 52:04.500]  or requiring the defendants to produce
[52:04.500 --> 52:08.500]  evidence instead of just a vague allegation
[52:08.500 --> 52:12.500]  is that a due process violation? Yes.
[52:12.500 --> 52:16.500]  Okay. Can you just kind of empty with some words that I can
[52:16.500 --> 52:20.500]  you know kind of add on to working?
[52:20.500 --> 52:24.500]  Let me get the email open I sent to Eddie Craig.
[52:24.500 --> 52:28.500]  Uh
[52:28.500 --> 52:32.500]  Joe Quinn I could call him
[52:32.500 --> 52:36.500]  Joe Quinn but it's J-O-A-C-I-M-V-State
[52:36.500 --> 52:40.500]  where is Eddie's?
[52:40.500 --> 52:44.500]  I got that off of uh Google Starler last night when you were talking about it.
[52:44.500 --> 52:48.500]  I call it uh let's see
[52:48.500 --> 52:52.500]  we had some tricky words Joe came
[52:52.500 --> 52:56.500]  Yeah Josephine D. V. State
[52:56.500 --> 53:00.500]  how there is uh found it.
[53:00.500 --> 53:04.500]  Once the prosecution okay
[53:04.500 --> 53:08.500]  a trial court has no discretion in determining
[53:08.500 --> 53:12.500]  what the law is or applying the law to the facts
[53:12.500 --> 53:16.500]  thus a clear failure by the court to analyze
[53:16.500 --> 53:20.500]  or apply the law
[53:20.500 --> 53:24.500]  correctly will constitute an abusive discretion.
[53:24.500 --> 53:28.500]  That denies the citizen's full free access to her enjoyment
[53:28.500 --> 53:32.500]  right that's a crime in every state. So charge the judge
[53:32.500 --> 53:36.500]  criminally.
[53:36.500 --> 53:40.500]  Okay well
[53:40.500 --> 53:44.500]  hmm
[53:44.500 --> 53:48.500]  Now did you go to trafficticket.website and download all those
[53:48.500 --> 53:52.500]  documents? Uh actually I have been there
[53:52.500 --> 53:56.500]  it's a good site but I haven't been there in a while. I did download quite a few documents
[53:56.500 --> 54:00.500]  but I've been kind of busy, haven't gone through everything and I haven't looked for
[54:00.500 --> 54:04.500]  I suppose a criminal complaint for
[54:04.500 --> 54:08.500]  use of discretion is that what you're talking about on the
[54:08.500 --> 54:12.500]  All of those documents are designed to
[54:12.500 --> 54:16.500]  set the court up.
[54:16.500 --> 54:20.500]  You want them to ignore those documents
[54:20.500 --> 54:24.500]  and give them all this big stack of documents and they say ah that's too much trouble
[54:24.500 --> 54:28.500]  we'll just blow them off. That's what you hope they do
[54:28.500 --> 54:32.500]  is then you use Jo Kim
[54:32.500 --> 54:36.500]  J-O-A-C-H-I-M-V chambers and file criminally against
[54:36.500 --> 54:40.500]  the judge and criminally against the prosecutor for not telling
[54:40.500 --> 54:44.500]  the judge that he screwed up like he's required to under the
[54:44.500 --> 54:48.500]  American Bar Association standards for the prosecution function.
[54:48.500 --> 54:52.500]  And then you bar grieve them both
[54:52.500 --> 54:56.500]  unless it's a county judge or a JP who may not be a lawyer.
[54:56.500 --> 55:00.500]  That's in the criminal case but I'm talking civil
[55:00.500 --> 55:04.500]  case. What civil case in Texas?
[55:04.500 --> 55:08.500]  Concerning traffic.
[55:08.500 --> 55:12.500]  A civil case for false arrest. There is no
[55:12.500 --> 55:16.500]  oh okay so you sued them for false arrest.
[55:16.500 --> 55:20.500]  It was not a false arrest. No no no you didn't answer my question.
[55:20.500 --> 55:24.500]  Did you sue them for false arrest?
[55:24.500 --> 55:28.500]  Okay there's not a false arrest is not
[55:28.500 --> 55:32.500]  the issue for which the state has waived its
[55:32.500 --> 55:36.500]  immunity. It's false imprisonment. Now you've been charged
[55:36.500 --> 55:40.500]  with okay wait a minute I'm not sure I'm understanding
[55:40.500 --> 55:44.500]  the civil matter you're speaking to.
[55:44.500 --> 55:48.500]  What are you saying is civil?
[55:48.500 --> 55:52.500]  Title 42.
[55:52.500 --> 55:56.500]  So you sued them in the federal court?
[55:56.500 --> 56:00.500]  Right and they're coming back and saying oh okay.
[56:00.500 --> 56:04.500]  So you filed a 42 U.S. Code 1983 suit. Have you also
[56:04.500 --> 56:08.500]  filed criminal charges, criminal complaints under 18 U.S. Code
[56:08.500 --> 56:12.500]  242, criminal counterpart?
[56:12.500 --> 56:16.500]  I did. No no I have not.
[56:16.500 --> 56:20.500]  I filed criminal charges but nothing happened with them
[56:20.500 --> 56:24.500]  and after that I haven't done anything else along those lines.
[56:24.500 --> 56:28.500]  I did other things. I did bar grievances
[56:28.500 --> 56:32.500]  and judicial conduct
[56:32.500 --> 56:36.500]  complaints but I have not done criminal and I'm kind of thinking it's a little bit
[56:36.500 --> 56:40.500]  late in the game to start on that plus I've been really...
[56:40.500 --> 56:44.500]  really late in the game for criminal. Criminal
[56:44.500 --> 56:48.500]  has nothing to do with civil.
[56:48.500 --> 56:52.500]  Yes but statute limitations is running out and I don't have time to spend on it
[56:52.500 --> 56:56.500]  unfortunately that's going to have to wait until next time.
[56:56.500 --> 57:00.500]  Well a criminal complaint
[57:00.500 --> 57:04.500]  has generally two years. How long has it been since they
[57:04.500 --> 57:08.500]  acted against you? Four.
[57:08.500 --> 57:12.500]  Well some of them are felonies.
[57:12.500 --> 57:16.500]  I thought it was five years on the criminal.
[57:16.500 --> 57:20.500]  No it depends on what it is.
[57:20.500 --> 57:24.500]  I think a classy misdemeanor is one year.
[57:24.500 --> 57:28.500]  A and B is two years
[57:28.500 --> 57:32.500]  and a felonies are three or five.
[57:32.500 --> 57:36.500]  Depending on what it is there's different statute limitations.
[57:36.500 --> 57:40.500]  I wanted to do that but I'm not too worried about it.
[57:40.500 --> 57:44.500]  I'm a little disappointed that I didn't do that but I will do it next time.
[57:44.500 --> 57:48.500]  I will be at first next time. Okay so this is a lot further along
[57:48.500 --> 57:52.500]  than I anticipated. This is not a recent little citation.
[57:52.500 --> 57:56.500]  This is a 2014 thing that's still ongoing
[57:56.500 --> 58:00.500]  but don't... Good.
[58:00.500 --> 58:04.500]  It's good for them to have one
[58:04.500 --> 58:08.500]  just hang on there. Okay hang on.
[58:08.500 --> 58:12.500]  We're about to go to break here. This is Randy Kelton.
[58:12.500 --> 58:16.500]  I like to hear it when people just don't quit beating them up.
[58:16.500 --> 58:20.500]  It's a little bit of a radio. Our call in number is 5126461984.
[58:20.500 --> 58:24.500]  We do have some open spots on the board
[58:24.500 --> 58:28.500]  so if you have a question or a comment give us a call. We had a call from
[58:28.500 --> 58:32.500]  California that dropped off. If you'll call back we will get to everyone.
[58:32.500 --> 58:36.500]  So hang on.
[58:36.500 --> 58:40.500]  We'll be right back.
[58:48.500 --> 58:52.500]  Would you like to make more definite
[58:52.500 --> 58:56.500]  progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America is offering
[58:56.500 --> 59:00.500]  a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can
[59:00.500 --> 59:04.500]  help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive
[59:04.500 --> 59:08.500]  study Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains
[59:08.500 --> 59:12.500]  thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning
[59:12.500 --> 59:16.500]  of life. The free books are a three volume set called
[59:16.500 --> 59:20.500]  basic elements of the Christian life. Chapter by chapter basic
[59:20.500 --> 59:24.500]  elements of the Christian life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.500 --> 59:28.500]  growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order
[59:28.500 --> 59:32.500]  your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements
[59:32.500 --> 59:36.500]  of the Christian life call Bibles for America toll free
[59:36.500 --> 59:40.500]  at 888-551-0102
[59:40.500 --> 59:44.500]  that's 888-551-0102
[59:44.500 --> 01:00:00.500]  or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:00.500 --> 01:00:04.500]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Low Star Lowdown
[01:00:04.500 --> 01:00:08.500]  providing the deli bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.500 --> 01:00:12.500]  Today in history, news updates
[01:00:12.500 --> 01:00:16.500]  and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:16.500 --> 01:00:20.500]  Markets for Thursday the 8th of November 2018 open with precious metals gold at
[01:00:20.500 --> 01:00:24.500]  $1,224.44 silver $14.45
[01:00:24.500 --> 01:00:28.500]  platinum $875.80
[01:00:28.500 --> 01:00:32.500]  palladium $1,138.55
[01:00:32.500 --> 01:00:36.500]  rhodium $2,440 copper at $2.72
[01:00:36.500 --> 01:00:40.500]  oil Texas crude $61.67 Brent crude
[01:00:40.500 --> 01:00:44.500]  and crypto at $6,497.71
[01:00:44.500 --> 01:00:48.500]  Ethereum $214.53
[01:00:48.500 --> 01:00:52.500]  XRP $51.00 bitcoin cash $592.53
[01:00:52.500 --> 01:00:56.500]  EOS $5.57 stellar $0.25
[01:00:56.500 --> 01:01:00.500]  and light coins at $53.49 a crypto coin.
[01:01:00.500 --> 01:01:04.500]  Today in history, the year
[01:01:04.500 --> 01:01:08.500]  2002 UN Security Council resolution
[01:01:08.500 --> 01:01:12.500]  1441 is approved forcing Saddam Hussein to disarm
[01:01:12.500 --> 01:01:16.500]  or face serious consequences today in history.
[01:01:16.500 --> 01:01:20.500]  In recent news, a fine arts teacher
[01:01:20.500 --> 01:01:24.500]  at Wesendorf Middle School in Rosenberg, Texas
[01:01:24.500 --> 01:01:28.500]  apparently attempted suicide in his classroom during school hours.
[01:01:28.500 --> 01:01:32.500]  He was found unconscious by another staff member. He later died at a local hospital.
[01:01:32.500 --> 01:01:36.500]  The principal of the school, Sonia Sanzo, assured parents in an email
[01:01:36.500 --> 01:01:40.500]  that medical personnel responded before any students were exposed to the scene
[01:01:40.500 --> 01:01:44.500]  and that the students were unaware of the emergency altogether. Investigators did determine his death
[01:01:44.500 --> 01:01:48.500]  to be a suicide, though they refused to expound on the exact details.
[01:01:48.500 --> 01:01:52.500]  Principal Sanzo did assure parents, however, that weapons were not on campus
[01:01:52.500 --> 01:01:56.500]  and that students weren't in any danger.
[01:01:56.500 --> 01:02:00.500]  A Texas judge
[01:02:00.500 --> 01:02:04.500]  gave the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals custody of
[01:02:04.500 --> 01:02:08.500]  110 animals, 39 puppies, 35 adult dogs, 24 cats,
[01:02:08.500 --> 01:02:12.500]  11 kittens and a horse for being abused and neglected by their owners in Canton, Texas
[01:02:12.500 --> 01:02:16.500]  ruling that over $31,000 is to be paid by the owners to cover
[01:02:16.500 --> 01:02:20.500]  the cost of the investigation, expert witnesses, and housing and care
[01:02:20.500 --> 01:02:24.500]  for the animals from the time of seizure until the hearing. The owners were arrested at the scene
[01:02:24.500 --> 01:02:28.500]  for child endangerment and animal cruelty and were booked into the
[01:02:28.500 --> 01:02:32.500]  Van Zandt County Jail.
[01:02:32.500 --> 01:02:36.500]  13 people were killed at the Borderline Bar and Grill
[01:02:36.500 --> 01:02:40.500]  in Thousand Oaks, California, making it the deadliest mass shooting in the United States
[01:02:40.500 --> 01:02:44.500]  since 17 classmates and teachers were gunned down at the Parkland Florida School
[01:02:44.500 --> 01:02:48.500]  nine months ago. President Trump tweeted that he had been fully breathed on the terrible
[01:02:48.500 --> 01:02:52.500]  shooting and God bless all the victims and families of the victim.
[01:02:52.500 --> 01:02:56.500]  This was Rick Rody with your lowdown from
[01:02:56.500 --> 01:03:02.500]  2018.
[01:03:26.500 --> 01:03:30.500]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Reel Blower Radio
[01:03:30.500 --> 01:03:34.500]  on this Friday the 9th day of September
[01:03:34.500 --> 01:03:38.500]  2nd. Oops, on this Friday the 9th day of
[01:03:38.500 --> 01:03:42.500]  November 2018, and we're talking Ralph
[01:03:42.500 --> 01:03:46.500]  in Texas. Okay, Ralph, go ahead.
[01:03:46.500 --> 01:03:50.500]  Yes, sir. So, what I don't understand
[01:03:50.500 --> 01:03:54.500]  is how a defendant can make an accusation
[01:03:54.500 --> 01:03:58.500]  in their defense, and the judge
[01:03:58.500 --> 01:04:02.500]  can rule on that accusation.
[01:04:02.500 --> 01:04:06.500]  Well, I don't understand the question, really. That's part of
[01:04:06.500 --> 01:04:10.500]  why I'm calling. See, because if you were in the criminal case
[01:04:10.500 --> 01:04:14.500]  and the defendant, I mean, and the prosecutor challenged you
[01:04:14.500 --> 01:04:18.500]  with saying you were engaged in transportation, then you would present
[01:04:18.500 --> 01:04:22.500]  evidence that you weren't, or you would require that they present evidence
[01:04:22.500 --> 01:04:26.500]  that you do, but this is simple. And they're using that
[01:04:26.500 --> 01:04:30.500]  in their defense that I was in transportation, and
[01:04:30.500 --> 01:04:34.500]  all I could do is say prove it, but it doesn't, it seems like
[01:04:34.500 --> 01:04:38.500]  something's missing. They should be required to
[01:04:38.500 --> 01:04:42.500]  prove it, or the judge should, what do you think?
[01:04:42.500 --> 01:04:46.500]  Exactly. Did you raise the issue
[01:04:46.500 --> 01:04:50.500]  that there was no evidence of transportation?
[01:04:50.500 --> 01:04:54.500]  Yes, I did. Okay, then that's an appellate issue.
[01:04:54.500 --> 01:04:58.500]  Okay, but what I was wondering was
[01:04:58.500 --> 01:05:02.500]  if it was actually a due process violation on the
[01:05:02.500 --> 01:05:06.500]  judge, and if it's not, then it's what
[01:05:06.500 --> 01:05:10.500]  I'll forget all my terminology. That's a
[01:05:10.500 --> 01:05:14.500]  it's a pillable error. It's a pillable error, but the way I'm
[01:05:14.500 --> 01:05:18.500]  reading the codes and the case law
[01:05:18.500 --> 01:05:22.500]  judges don't get to make errors
[01:05:22.500 --> 01:05:26.500]  when those errors go to due process.
[01:05:26.500 --> 01:05:30.500]  But is it due process? That's a crime.
[01:05:30.500 --> 01:05:34.500]  No, but I mean, is it due process to
[01:05:34.500 --> 01:05:38.500]  say that, okay, you're engaged in transportation
[01:05:38.500 --> 01:05:42.500]  and I'm like, well, you just declared me a criminal.
[01:05:42.500 --> 01:05:46.500]  So that's my appeal argument is that, well, when the
[01:05:46.500 --> 01:05:50.500]  great judge says, yeah, the defendants are right, you're engaged in transportation
[01:05:50.500 --> 01:05:54.500]  and you could have been arrested for this, I'm saying, well, he just made me a criminal.
[01:05:54.500 --> 01:05:58.500]  Yeah, did you object? Okay, I take it
[01:05:58.500 --> 01:06:02.500]  you objected to that. Yes, yes, yes. Okay,
[01:06:02.500 --> 01:06:06.500]  where are you at in the trial at this point?
[01:06:06.500 --> 01:06:10.500]  We're... The one of Zalka,
[01:06:10.500 --> 01:06:14.500]  you're in a federal court. So
[01:06:14.500 --> 01:06:18.500]  are you still litigating the case or has the case
[01:06:18.500 --> 01:06:22.500]  in the trial court been received a final
[01:06:22.500 --> 01:06:26.500]  adjudication? No, it's still ongoing.
[01:06:26.500 --> 01:06:30.500]  Oh, okay. We're at summary judgment right now. Okay.
[01:06:30.500 --> 01:06:34.500]  One thing to always keep in mind and make your life easier.
[01:06:34.500 --> 01:06:38.500]  Your only purpose in the trial court
[01:06:38.500 --> 01:06:42.500]  is to set the record for appeal.
[01:06:42.500 --> 01:06:46.500]  Always if a judge renders
[01:06:46.500 --> 01:06:50.500]  a ruling like a ruling of this nature, you want to ask
[01:06:50.500 --> 01:06:54.500]  the court for finding the fact and conclusions at law and support
[01:06:54.500 --> 01:06:58.500]  of that ruling. But you can do that
[01:06:58.500 --> 01:07:02.500]  when you get to the judgment, when you get to
[01:07:02.500 --> 01:07:06.500]  the final ruling, then you can go back and ask for findings
[01:07:06.500 --> 01:07:10.500]  of fact for each of these rulings where you have set the record
[01:07:10.500 --> 01:07:14.500]  with an objection. You ask him for findings of fact
[01:07:14.500 --> 01:07:18.500]  and the best way to do that is you do this
[01:07:18.500 --> 01:07:22.500]  in the form of a motion for new trial.
[01:07:22.500 --> 01:07:26.500]  The best way to do that is to prepare your own findings of fact
[01:07:26.500 --> 01:07:30.500]  and file those and ask the court
[01:07:30.500 --> 01:07:34.500]  to accept your findings of fact or prepare
[01:07:34.500 --> 01:07:38.500]  his own. In either case, you get your arguments
[01:07:38.500 --> 01:07:42.500]  and issues on the record.
[01:07:42.500 --> 01:07:46.500]  Everything's about setting the record.
[01:07:46.500 --> 01:07:50.500]  Yeah, that's a new one on there. I listen pretty regular.
[01:07:50.500 --> 01:07:54.500]  That's interesting. Okay.
[01:07:54.500 --> 01:07:58.500]  This is something we talk about a lot and this comes from Frederick Graves'
[01:07:58.500 --> 01:08:02.500]  jurisdiction. Never expect to win in the trial court.
[01:08:02.500 --> 01:08:06.500]  Your only purpose in the trial court
[01:08:06.500 --> 01:08:10.500]  should be to set the record for appeal.
[01:08:10.500 --> 01:08:14.500]  If you think about the trial court this way
[01:08:14.500 --> 01:08:18.500]  it will protect you.
[01:08:18.500 --> 01:08:22.500]  It will protect you from feeling mistreated
[01:08:22.500 --> 01:08:26.500]  and betrayed in the trial court. Because at the end
[01:08:26.500 --> 01:08:30.500]  of the day, you don't care what that judge does.
[01:08:30.500 --> 01:08:34.500]  The dumber he is, the worse his rulings, the better for you.
[01:08:34.500 --> 01:08:38.500]  The more issues you get for appeal, the more
[01:08:38.500 --> 01:08:42.500]  opportunities the court of appeals has to overrule
[01:08:42.500 --> 01:08:46.500]  the trial judge.
[01:08:46.500 --> 01:08:50.500]  So your only purpose is to set the record. Object everything.
[01:08:50.500 --> 01:08:54.500]  Make sure you get all the issues before the court.
[01:08:54.500 --> 01:08:58.500]  Make sure you get all the law and the facts before the court.
[01:08:58.500 --> 01:09:02.500]  If you do that, you've done your job.
[01:09:02.500 --> 01:09:06.500]  If you're doing it that way, they will come to
[01:09:06.500 --> 01:09:10.500]  recognize that you're doing it that way. You don't care what
[01:09:10.500 --> 01:09:14.500]  the judge does. You're just setting the record for appeal.
[01:09:14.500 --> 01:09:18.500]  If they're screwing up, they're not going to want to go to appeal.
[01:09:18.500 --> 01:09:22.500]  Okay.
[01:09:22.500 --> 01:09:26.500]  It looks like we're down
[01:09:26.500 --> 01:09:30.500]  to the last couple of things to do.
[01:09:30.500 --> 01:09:34.500]  Some adjustment motions.
[01:09:34.500 --> 01:09:38.500]  One thing that should help
[01:09:38.500 --> 01:09:42.500]  is everything you do in the trial court,
[01:09:42.500 --> 01:09:46.500]  you should be thinking about appeals.
[01:09:46.500 --> 01:09:50.500]  When I write a document in the trial court,
[01:09:50.500 --> 01:09:54.500]  I'm writing that document so that I can use part
[01:09:54.500 --> 01:09:58.500]  of that in my request for funding
[01:09:58.500 --> 01:10:02.500]  to factor conclusions at law.
[01:10:02.500 --> 01:10:06.500]  Or my request for a new trial
[01:10:06.500 --> 01:10:10.500]  or reconsideration of a new trial is the same thing in FED.
[01:10:10.500 --> 01:10:14.500]  I want to take my pleadings the way I've written them
[01:10:14.500 --> 01:10:18.500]  and then just add to them, brief them
[01:10:18.500 --> 01:10:22.500]  out somewhat more than I do in a standard motion,
[01:10:22.500 --> 01:10:26.500]  and then use that as my request for a new trial.
[01:10:26.500 --> 01:10:30.500]  And then when they deny that, then I take that request for a new trial
[01:10:30.500 --> 01:10:34.500]  and add more briefing to it, and now I have my
[01:10:34.500 --> 01:10:38.500]  brief for the appeals court.
[01:10:38.500 --> 01:10:42.500]  So instead of waiting until you get to the point of appeal
[01:10:42.500 --> 01:10:46.500]  to write a brief, you start writing your brief with your
[01:10:46.500 --> 01:10:50.500]  original motions. In Tim's, Tim Pictures
[01:10:50.500 --> 01:10:54.500]  case, the lawyers on the other side
[01:10:54.500 --> 01:10:58.500]  claimed that Mr. Pixler in his motions were doing
[01:10:58.500 --> 01:11:02.500]  nothing more than cutting and pasting.
[01:11:02.500 --> 01:11:06.500]  Yes, as a matter of fact, we were.
[01:11:06.500 --> 01:11:10.500]  It's because we wrote our documents to be cumulative
[01:11:10.500 --> 01:11:14.500]  and we're always building on the same arguments.
[01:11:14.500 --> 01:11:18.500]  We're not jumping all over the place.
[01:11:18.500 --> 01:11:22.500]  And for the most part, the appellate courts rule pretty well
[01:11:22.500 --> 01:11:26.500]  on our documents. Tim got a
[01:11:26.500 --> 01:11:30.500]  petition for rid of mandamus
[01:11:30.500 --> 01:11:34.500]  ruled in his favor.
[01:11:34.500 --> 01:11:38.500]  Petitions for rid of mandamus only get accepted about 12% of the time
[01:11:38.500 --> 01:11:42.500]  and only 2% of the time
[01:11:42.500 --> 01:11:46.500]  are they ruled in the favor of the filer.
[01:11:46.500 --> 01:11:50.500]  And this one's by a pro se. I don't know if that's ever happened before.
[01:11:50.500 --> 01:11:54.500]  But that's because we set the record.
[01:11:54.500 --> 01:11:58.500]  We set the record from the start and yes, we did cut and paste.
[01:11:58.500 --> 01:12:02.500]  We took that first document and added
[01:12:02.500 --> 01:12:06.500]  what went on after that document, added case law to it,
[01:12:06.500 --> 01:12:10.500]  and built the next document. And then the next.
[01:12:10.500 --> 01:12:14.500]  We have the court, the court on appeal, they haven't seen your case before
[01:12:14.500 --> 01:12:18.500]  so they start reading the documents. They read the motions
[01:12:18.500 --> 01:12:22.500]  and pleadings. If you have constructed
[01:12:22.500 --> 01:12:26.500]  your documents in a cumulative way
[01:12:26.500 --> 01:12:30.500]  where you make an argument initially
[01:12:30.500 --> 01:12:34.500]  and in the next document you
[01:12:34.500 --> 01:12:38.500]  reiterate that argument and add to it and then add to it again. But
[01:12:38.500 --> 01:12:42.500]  time they get to the appellate documents, they've read the same arguments several
[01:12:42.500 --> 01:12:46.500]  times. They've read them written
[01:12:46.500 --> 01:12:50.500]  pretty much in exactly the same way. So
[01:12:50.500 --> 01:12:54.500]  it begins to stick. If you write
[01:12:54.500 --> 01:12:58.500]  everything from scratch each time, you have a scrambled
[01:12:58.500 --> 01:13:02.500]  mess that the judges may understand and they may not.
[01:13:02.500 --> 01:13:06.500]  In my ebook I have a section on
[01:13:06.500 --> 01:13:10.500]  mental flow. A section
[01:13:10.500 --> 01:13:14.500]  on writing legal documents. But there's a whole section
[01:13:14.500 --> 01:13:18.500]  on their own mental flow. My primary study is not law, my primary study is psychology.
[01:13:18.500 --> 01:13:22.500]  And how the brain does what it
[01:13:22.500 --> 01:13:26.500]  does. For the most part we understand
[01:13:26.500 --> 01:13:30.500]  things by linkages. By connecting the
[01:13:30.500 --> 01:13:34.500]  dots. We connect one piece of information to the next, to the next,
[01:13:34.500 --> 01:13:38.500]  to the next. So when we write something we want to move
[01:13:38.500 --> 01:13:42.500]  the reader from one point to the next place, to the next
[01:13:42.500 --> 01:13:46.500]  place in a way that won't leave
[01:13:46.500 --> 01:13:50.500]  unanswered questions in the mind of the reader.
[01:13:50.500 --> 01:13:54.500]  That lays plants for something,
[01:13:54.500 --> 01:13:58.500]  you lay a plant early for something you're going to do later
[01:13:58.500 --> 01:14:02.500]  so that the reader
[01:14:02.500 --> 01:14:06.500]  recognizes an earlier reference to this issue
[01:14:06.500 --> 01:14:10.500]  and it develops continuity and flow in
[01:14:10.500 --> 01:14:14.500]  mental, develops mental
[01:14:14.500 --> 01:14:18.500]  flow. They can move right along. You don't ever want to create a
[01:14:18.500 --> 01:14:22.500]  question in the mind of your reader that you don't answer.
[01:14:22.500 --> 01:14:26.500]  One of my biggest struggles in writing documents
[01:14:26.500 --> 01:14:30.500]  is how do I craft my language
[01:14:30.500 --> 01:14:34.500]  so that I don't create a question in the mind of
[01:14:34.500 --> 01:14:38.500]  my reader that I'm not aware of. Sometimes I
[01:14:38.500 --> 01:14:42.500]  want to create a question in the mind of the reader.
[01:14:42.500 --> 01:14:46.500]  If you create a question you need to know that you've done that
[01:14:46.500 --> 01:14:50.500]  so that you can subsequently give closure.
[01:14:50.500 --> 01:14:54.500]  Answer that question. Don't go to a couple of sentences before
[01:14:54.500 --> 01:14:58.500]  you answer that question. That creates
[01:14:58.500 --> 01:15:02.500]  an expectation in the mind of the reader that when you give them
[01:15:02.500 --> 01:15:06.500]  something that's not clear to them that very shortly you will give them
[01:15:06.500 --> 01:15:10.500]  clarification and closure and it will allow them to
[01:15:10.500 --> 01:15:14.500]  read your documents with a more steady flow.
[01:15:14.500 --> 01:15:18.500]  Have you ever read a book or something where you start reading it and
[01:15:18.500 --> 01:15:22.500]  an hour later you've kind of come to?
[01:15:22.500 --> 01:15:26.500]  If you've ever done that, whoever wrote that
[01:15:26.500 --> 01:15:30.500]  they developed mental flow
[01:15:30.500 --> 01:15:34.500]  and never bumped you out of flow. So you get to fall
[01:15:34.500 --> 01:15:38.500]  into the content and you don't get tripped up on
[01:15:38.500 --> 01:15:42.500]  verbiage and punctuation. You just flow right with the content.
[01:15:42.500 --> 01:15:46.500]  That's what we try to do with legal documents. Most lawyers just simply do not
[01:15:46.500 --> 01:15:50.500]  understand that concept.
[01:15:50.500 --> 01:15:54.500]  We have one caller, I call her bad grandma, Leslie Orman
[01:15:54.500 --> 01:15:58.500]  from Pennsylvania. She's now in
[01:15:58.500 --> 01:16:02.500]  Yuma. But her documents are absolutely
[01:16:02.500 --> 01:16:06.500]  well. The 10th grader could read these documents
[01:16:06.500 --> 01:16:10.500]  and make sense of them. You never have any
[01:16:10.500 --> 01:16:14.500]  questions that she creates that she doesn't answer.
[01:16:14.500 --> 01:16:18.500]  She writes very powerful documents.
[01:16:18.500 --> 01:16:22.500]  Hang on, I kind of got off on this subject but
[01:16:22.500 --> 01:16:26.500]  goes to the point initially
[01:16:26.500 --> 01:16:30.500]  always if you're writing your documents for appeal
[01:16:30.500 --> 01:16:34.500]  this gets a lot easier. It's more clear that you're writing
[01:16:34.500 --> 01:16:38.500]  this document in preparation for one to follow and then the next one
[01:16:38.500 --> 01:16:42.500]  in preparation for the one to follow that. It makes your case a lot easier to keep up with
[01:16:42.500 --> 01:16:46.500]  as well. Hang on, about to go to break. Randy Kelton,
[01:16:46.500 --> 01:16:50.500]  Will of La Radio, I call in number 512-646-1984
[01:16:50.500 --> 01:17:02.500]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:02.500 --> 01:17:06.500]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network
[01:17:06.500 --> 01:17:10.500]  annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[01:17:10.500 --> 01:17:14.500]  Gunworks. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to
[01:17:14.500 --> 01:17:18.500]  win. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:18.500 --> 01:17:22.500]  From Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs
[01:17:22.500 --> 01:17:26.500]  is the Spikes Tactical AR-15. More prizes
[01:17:26.500 --> 01:17:30.500]  and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book
[01:17:30.500 --> 01:17:34.500]  Legal 101, you get 4 chances to win.
[01:17:34.500 --> 01:17:38.500]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:38.500 --> 01:17:42.500]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:42.500 --> 01:17:46.500]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser
[01:17:46.500 --> 01:17:50.500]  so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on
[01:17:50.500 --> 01:17:54.500]  Talk Radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other crypto currency.
[01:17:54.500 --> 01:17:58.500]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate
[01:17:58.500 --> 01:18:02.500]  today. I love Logos. Without the shows on this
[01:18:02.500 --> 01:18:06.500]  network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now
[01:18:06.500 --> 01:18:10.500]  that there's no going back. I need my truth stick. I'd be lost without Logos
[01:18:10.500 --> 01:18:14.500]  and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer
[01:18:14.500 --> 01:18:18.500]  as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money
[01:18:18.500 --> 01:18:22.500]  to give because I spend it all on supplements. How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.500 --> 01:18:26.500]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon,
[01:18:26.500 --> 01:18:30.500]  you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do
[01:18:30.500 --> 01:18:34.500]  is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:18:34.500 --> 01:18:38.500]  Click on the Amazon logo and book market. Now
[01:18:38.500 --> 01:18:42.500]  when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets
[01:18:42.500 --> 01:18:46.500]  a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything
[01:18:46.500 --> 01:18:50.500]  different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No.
[01:18:50.500 --> 01:18:54.500]  I mean yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money
[01:18:54.500 --> 01:18:58.500]  this is perfect. Thank you so much. We are Logos.
[01:18:58.500 --> 01:19:02.500]  Happy holidays Logos.
[01:19:02.500 --> 01:19:06.500]  Logos. Logos. Radio.
[01:19:06.500 --> 01:19:10.500]  Logos. Radio.
[01:19:10.500 --> 01:19:14.500]  Logos. Radio.
[01:19:14.500 --> 01:19:18.500]  Logos. Radio.
[01:19:18.500 --> 01:19:22.500]  Okay, we are back. Randy Calton,
[01:19:22.500 --> 01:19:26.500]  we are talking to Ralph in Texas. Okay Ralph,
[01:19:26.500 --> 01:19:30.500]  Logos rambling or did all that make sense? Or some other
[01:19:30.500 --> 01:19:34.500]  make sense? Yeah, I've been listening since
[01:19:34.500 --> 01:19:38.500]  2014 and I may not get a diploma yet but I've certainly learned a lot.
[01:19:38.500 --> 01:19:42.500]  Well, I hope it's helpful.
[01:19:42.500 --> 01:19:46.500]  A lot of what I do here is
[01:19:46.500 --> 01:19:50.500]  I sit here, I'm speaking to a microphone
[01:19:50.500 --> 01:19:54.500]  so I can't see who I'm talking to
[01:19:54.500 --> 01:19:58.500]  and we're addressing complex legal issues
[01:19:58.500 --> 01:20:02.500]  and it is a struggle
[01:20:02.500 --> 01:20:06.500]  to work out a way to formulate my language
[01:20:06.500 --> 01:20:10.500]  so that the image I have
[01:20:10.500 --> 01:20:14.500]  or the understanding I have in my mind, I can accurately
[01:20:14.500 --> 01:20:18.500]  transmit to someone else's mind.
[01:20:18.500 --> 01:20:22.500]  It is my opinion that that is one of the highest functions
[01:20:22.500 --> 01:20:26.500]  of human endeavor
[01:20:26.500 --> 01:20:30.500]  is to be able to accurately communicate
[01:20:30.500 --> 01:20:34.500]  complex ideas one to the other. And I spend
[01:20:34.500 --> 01:20:38.500]  a lot of time doing that, a lot of the things that I
[01:20:38.500 --> 01:20:42.500]  present here. It doesn't always appear that way
[01:20:42.500 --> 01:20:46.500]  but they have been carefully crafted
[01:20:46.500 --> 01:20:50.500]  for the purpose of helping people
[01:20:50.500 --> 01:20:54.500]  avoid problems and issues that they may not
[01:20:54.500 --> 01:20:58.500]  necessarily recognize occurs. One of the
[01:20:58.500 --> 01:21:02.500]  biggest problems we have to deal with is a feeling
[01:21:02.500 --> 01:21:06.500]  of betrayal. Betrayal is the
[01:21:06.500 --> 01:21:10.500]  worst thing to happen to you. You talked to Ted Scarlett earlier
[01:21:10.500 --> 01:21:14.500]  and he was talking about how bad it is when you know you're innocent
[01:21:14.500 --> 01:21:18.500]  and how difficult it makes it
[01:21:18.500 --> 01:21:22.500]  and that's because you feel betrayed.
[01:21:22.500 --> 01:21:26.500]  You know, I'm a combat veteran and
[01:21:26.500 --> 01:21:30.500]  when I came back from Vietnam it was really, really bad things happen.
[01:21:30.500 --> 01:21:34.500]  I brought my twin brother's body back
[01:21:34.500 --> 01:21:38.500]  among other things but it was a really, really bad time.
[01:21:38.500 --> 01:21:42.500]  But absolutely
[01:21:42.500 --> 01:21:46.500]  the worst experience of my life to this day.
[01:21:46.500 --> 01:21:50.500]  1.30 in the morning I hit SeaTac airport
[01:21:50.500 --> 01:21:54.500]  in Seattle. I'm trying to get
[01:21:54.500 --> 01:21:58.500]  to Chicago so that my parents don't see two
[01:21:58.500 --> 01:22:02.500]  officers in uniform walking up their front steps.
[01:22:02.500 --> 01:22:06.500]  I wanted to be the one to bring that news to them.
[01:22:06.500 --> 01:22:10.500]  But the army had lost my
[01:22:10.500 --> 01:22:14.500]  duffel bag and all my luggage. I've been in jungle fatigues. I've been in
[01:22:14.500 --> 01:22:18.500]  for a week. I've unloaded helicopters
[01:22:18.500 --> 01:22:22.500]  and they've blood soaked and I'm in the tropics
[01:22:22.500 --> 01:22:26.500]  where it's hot and a reek of mildew.
[01:22:26.500 --> 01:22:30.500]  You get nose blind to the mildew after a while but
[01:22:30.500 --> 01:22:34.500]  when you step off the airplane the mildew, the place just reeks of it.
[01:22:34.500 --> 01:22:38.500]  So I was nose blind to all of this
[01:22:38.500 --> 01:22:42.500]  when I come back. My fatigues are ripped and tore up
[01:22:42.500 --> 01:22:46.500]  and blood soaked. I'm a mess.
[01:22:46.500 --> 01:22:50.500]  I'm walking down the terminal in SeaTac airport
[01:22:50.500 --> 01:22:54.500]  and this woman coming toward me two days later
[01:22:54.500 --> 01:22:58.500]  I'm sorry, two days before that I was unloading helicopters
[01:22:58.500 --> 01:23:02.500]  with a half a dozen little children that were injured
[01:23:02.500 --> 01:23:06.500]  that we had brought down from Saigon. I mean from July to Saigon.
[01:23:06.500 --> 01:23:10.500]  And up to that point that was the
[01:23:10.500 --> 01:23:14.500]  worst thing we ever dealt with as the children.
[01:23:14.500 --> 01:23:18.500]  So I'm in SeaTac airport walking down the terminal.
[01:23:18.500 --> 01:23:22.500]  The Red Cross had got me
[01:23:22.500 --> 01:23:26.500]  a seat on an airplane. So I'm going down to the airplane
[01:23:26.500 --> 01:23:30.500]  and this woman coming toward me, mid-twenties, young woman
[01:23:30.500 --> 01:23:34.500]  with two or three little kids with her.
[01:23:34.500 --> 01:23:38.500]  She scooted those children up against the wall
[01:23:38.500 --> 01:23:42.500]  and stood between them and me as I passed.
[01:23:42.500 --> 01:23:46.500]  And I remember looking at her thinking
[01:23:46.500 --> 01:23:50.500]  do you really think you have to protect your
[01:23:50.500 --> 01:23:54.500]  children from me?
[01:23:54.500 --> 01:23:58.500]  You have any idea where I've been, what I've been doing these last
[01:23:58.500 --> 01:24:02.500]  few weeks and you think you have to protect your children
[01:24:02.500 --> 01:24:06.500]  from me. To this day
[01:24:06.500 --> 01:24:10.500]  that feeling of utter betrayal
[01:24:10.500 --> 01:24:14.500]  is still the worst experience of my life.
[01:24:14.500 --> 01:24:18.500]  When you get into a legal situation
[01:24:18.500 --> 01:24:22.500]  and you find out that the government
[01:24:22.500 --> 01:24:26.500]  that you have been led to trust and accept
[01:24:26.500 --> 01:24:30.500]  and literally place your life in safety
[01:24:30.500 --> 01:24:34.500]  in is really not there to protect you
[01:24:34.500 --> 01:24:38.500]  after all. That is a horrible
[01:24:38.500 --> 01:24:42.500]  experience to have. It's a terrible realization
[01:24:42.500 --> 01:24:46.500]  you have to come to. One of the most
[01:24:46.500 --> 01:24:50.500]  things to overcome. A lot of what I do
[01:24:50.500 --> 01:24:54.500]  in the stories that I tell, they're
[01:24:54.500 --> 01:24:58.500]  designed for the most part as therapeutic
[01:24:58.500 --> 01:25:02.500]  metaphors. They're designed to create
[01:25:02.500 --> 01:25:06.500]  a state of mind that will help protect
[01:25:06.500 --> 01:25:10.500]  you from that. When I say never ask the public official to do anything that you
[01:25:10.500 --> 01:25:14.500]  actually want them to do. That's
[01:25:14.500 --> 01:25:18.500]  because we're trying to avoid this expectation
[01:25:18.500 --> 01:25:22.500]  that your government officials will protect you.
[01:25:22.500 --> 01:25:26.500]  Trying to keep you from being in a position to feel betrayed
[01:25:26.500 --> 01:25:30.500]  and feel unsafe
[01:25:30.500 --> 01:25:34.500]  and not protected by these people. Because
[01:25:34.500 --> 01:25:38.500]  that is devastating and debilitating.
[01:25:38.500 --> 01:25:42.500]  If we turn that around and
[01:25:42.500 --> 01:25:46.500]  if I can get people to understand that when you walk into courthouse
[01:25:46.500 --> 01:25:50.500]  you are the baddest motor school in the building.
[01:25:50.500 --> 01:25:54.500]  You've been fighting these guys, you're beginning to understand that.
[01:25:54.500 --> 01:25:58.500]  So you're protected from
[01:25:58.500 --> 01:26:02.500]  that feeling of betrayal. We try to
[01:26:02.500 --> 01:26:06.500]  take that expectation of good
[01:26:06.500 --> 01:26:10.500]  faith and fair dealing.
[01:26:10.500 --> 01:26:14.500]  Just oppose it with a responsibility
[01:26:14.500 --> 01:26:18.500]  of ensuring that our public officials abide by
[01:26:18.500 --> 01:26:22.500]  our law. So instead of feeling devastated
[01:26:22.500 --> 01:26:26.500]  when one of our public officials failed to
[01:26:26.500 --> 01:26:30.500]  do something that they're required to do and cause
[01:26:30.500 --> 01:26:34.500]  us to feel as though we're no longer protected by them.
[01:26:34.500 --> 01:26:38.500]  We try to switch that around so we draw
[01:26:38.500 --> 01:26:42.500]  out our parent
[01:26:42.500 --> 01:26:46.500]  posture where
[01:26:46.500 --> 01:26:50.500]  it's our job to correct our recalcitrant public officials.
[01:26:50.500 --> 01:26:54.500]  I talk about my public officials that I think
[01:26:54.500 --> 01:26:58.500]  of them like I do my grandkids. I loved them dearly.
[01:26:58.500 --> 01:27:02.500]  But if one of them runs out on the road, I'm
[01:27:02.500 --> 01:27:06.500]  fixing to tan his hide.
[01:27:06.500 --> 01:27:10.500]  That's there to give us another
[01:27:10.500 --> 01:27:14.500]  way of dealing with these things that they're doing.
[01:27:14.500 --> 01:27:18.500]  And I go over these a lot and that's what I'm doing right now
[01:27:18.500 --> 01:27:22.500]  is going back over some of these in different ways
[01:27:22.500 --> 01:27:26.500]  so that they become a part of the way people think.
[01:27:26.500 --> 01:27:30.500]  So that when we get in front of these, that our public
[01:27:30.500 --> 01:27:34.500]  officials, instead of considering this person who
[01:27:34.500 --> 01:27:38.500]  comes before them and doesn't do everything
[01:27:38.500 --> 01:27:42.500]  they're told when they're told how they're told,
[01:27:42.500 --> 01:27:46.500]  they don't get to think of us anymore as sovereign citizens.
[01:27:46.500 --> 01:27:50.500]  They get to think of us as potentially big
[01:27:50.500 --> 01:27:54.500]  troubles. These are the guys that's
[01:27:54.500 --> 01:27:58.500]  going to cause you serious misery. So you
[01:27:58.500 --> 01:28:02.500]  best be careful. You know, for years I've been
[01:28:02.500 --> 01:28:06.500]  saying that it is my stated intent
[01:28:06.500 --> 01:28:10.500]  to place every judge in the country
[01:28:10.500 --> 01:28:14.500]  in a position such that when he steps up behind
[01:28:14.500 --> 01:28:18.500]  the bench and looks out across the bar at the gallery,
[01:28:18.500 --> 01:28:22.500]  I want him wondering which one. Which one of those scoundrels
[01:28:22.500 --> 01:28:26.500]  sitting out there is waiting for me to render a ruling or to do something in this court.
[01:28:26.500 --> 01:28:30.500]  So he can run down to the grand jury and try to get me indicted.
[01:28:30.500 --> 01:28:34.500]  If we go into court with that
[01:28:34.500 --> 01:28:38.500]  perspective, with that state of mind,
[01:28:38.500 --> 01:28:42.500]  then these public officials we deal with
[01:28:42.500 --> 01:28:46.500]  will recognize that relatively quickly. I suspect
[01:28:46.500 --> 01:28:50.500]  Ralph, that when you go into court, you don't get much
[01:28:50.500 --> 01:28:54.500]  grief from bailiffs and prosecutors and
[01:28:54.500 --> 01:28:58.500]  courts. I suspect they treat you
[01:28:58.500 --> 01:29:02.500]  with a fair amount of dignity and respect. Is that the case?
[01:29:02.500 --> 01:29:06.500]  I would say for the most part.
[01:29:06.500 --> 01:29:10.500]  There's a few instances once in a while.
[01:29:10.500 --> 01:29:14.500]  I was thinking about one that happened recently but I don't want to get into that.
[01:29:14.500 --> 01:29:18.500]  Look, I want to let somebody else get on due and I won't keep you too long
[01:29:18.500 --> 01:29:22.500]  but I do want to ask you one more question. You said you're a psychology
[01:29:22.500 --> 01:29:26.500]  major or that was your... Yes, that was my primary
[01:29:26.500 --> 01:29:30.500]  study. I didn't major in college but that's been my 30-year study.
[01:29:30.500 --> 01:29:34.500]  Have you read Animals in Translation?
[01:29:34.500 --> 01:29:38.500]  Temple Granding, Animals in Translation?
[01:29:38.500 --> 01:29:42.500]  No. Using the mysteries of autism to decode animal behavior.
[01:29:42.500 --> 01:29:46.500]  Interesting. Hang on, hang on. I'm about to go to break now.
[01:29:46.500 --> 01:29:50.500]  Now you've got my interest. Randy Kelton, Ruvila Radio,
[01:29:50.500 --> 01:29:54.500]  we'll be right back.
[01:29:54.500 --> 01:29:58.500]  If you saw a neighbor
[01:29:58.500 --> 01:30:02.500]  struggling with heavy furniture, would you stop and offer to help?
[01:30:02.500 --> 01:30:06.500]  One man did and got a huge surprise.
[01:30:06.500 --> 01:30:10.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the tale of the Good Samaritan
[01:30:10.500 --> 01:30:14.500]  and the Heavy TV. Next.
[01:30:14.500 --> 01:30:18.500]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[01:30:18.500 --> 01:30:22.500]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is under attack,
[01:30:22.500 --> 01:30:26.500]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.500 --> 01:30:30.500]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information
[01:30:30.500 --> 01:30:34.500]  to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.500 --> 01:30:38.500]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.500 --> 01:30:42.500]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:42.500 --> 01:30:46.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.500 --> 01:30:50.500]  Imagine you're coming home from work when you see someone lugging a huge TV
[01:30:50.500 --> 01:30:54.500]  down the sidewalk. Would you pity the guy and help out or would you drive on
[01:30:54.500 --> 01:30:58.500]  past? One Delaware Good Samaritan did the right thing when he lent
[01:30:58.500 --> 01:31:02.500]  a hand to a stranger struggling to carry a flat screen TV.
[01:31:02.500 --> 01:31:06.500]  Then he noticed this. The door of his house was ajar and the television
[01:31:06.500 --> 01:31:10.500]  was his. Picture the scene. Thief and victim lock stairs.
[01:31:10.500 --> 01:31:14.500]  Thief dumps the TV in bolts. Victim chases Thief, dialing 911
[01:31:14.500 --> 01:31:18.500]  on his cell phone. Police respond quickly and nab the Thief
[01:31:18.500 --> 01:31:22.500]  and his getaway driver. The moral to the story? Lend a hand. Some good
[01:31:22.500 --> 01:31:26.500]  might come of it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albracht for StartPage.com,
[01:31:26.500 --> 01:31:30.500]  the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.500 --> 01:31:34.500]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper
[01:31:34.500 --> 01:31:38.500]  that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought
[01:31:38.500 --> 01:31:42.500]  it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:31:42.500 --> 01:31:46.500]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given
[01:31:46.500 --> 01:31:50.500]  their lives. And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy
[01:31:50.500 --> 01:31:54.500]  theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force
[01:31:54.500 --> 01:31:58.500]  pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.500 --> 01:32:02.500]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. Hey, it's Danny
[01:32:02.500 --> 01:32:06.500]  here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the
[01:32:06.500 --> 01:32:10.500]  recent storms? Come on, we all know the government caused it with their Kim Trails.
[01:32:10.500 --> 01:32:14.500]  But good luck getting them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the Kim Trails. But I'm serious
[01:32:14.500 --> 01:32:18.500]  about your roof. That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can
[01:32:18.500 --> 01:32:22.500]  handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept
[01:32:22.500 --> 01:32:26.500]  Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with
[01:32:26.500 --> 01:32:30.500]  zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim
[01:32:30.500 --> 01:32:36.500]  and your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745
[01:32:36.500 --> 01:32:40.500]  or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show
[01:32:40.500 --> 01:32:44.500]  and get $100 off. And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network
[01:32:44.500 --> 01:32:48.500]  to help continue this programming. So if those out-of-town roofers come
[01:32:48.500 --> 01:32:54.500]  knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745
[01:32:54.500 --> 01:32:58.500]  or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on
[01:32:58.500 --> 01:33:02.500]  full roof replacement. I mean, I actually be kidding about Kim Trails.
[01:33:02.500 --> 01:33:06.500]  Looking for some truth? You found it.
[01:33:06.500 --> 01:33:10.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:10.500 --> 01:33:14.500]  Music
[01:33:14.500 --> 01:33:18.500]  Music
[01:33:18.500 --> 01:33:22.500]  Music
[01:33:22.500 --> 01:33:26.500]  Music
[01:33:26.500 --> 01:33:30.500]  Music
[01:33:30.500 --> 01:33:34.500]  Music
[01:33:34.500 --> 01:33:38.500]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rueville Rady and we're talking to Ralph in Texas.
[01:33:38.500 --> 01:33:42.500]  Okay, Ralph, what was the name of that book again?
[01:33:42.500 --> 01:33:46.500]  Animals in Translation
[01:33:46.500 --> 01:33:50.500]  and the subtitle would be
[01:33:50.500 --> 01:33:54.500]  Using the Mysteries of Autism to Decode Animal Behavior.
[01:33:54.500 --> 01:33:58.500]  Excuse me.
[01:33:58.500 --> 01:34:02.500]  So, we're animals. Of course, our book is about
[01:34:02.500 --> 01:34:06.500]  cows and dogs and horses, but
[01:34:06.500 --> 01:34:10.500]  you find it interesting and I say that because I read your rubber ball theory.
[01:34:10.500 --> 01:34:14.500]  Yes, and it's my
[01:34:14.500 --> 01:34:18.500]  opinion that if God created man,
[01:34:18.500 --> 01:34:22.500]  he didn't start from scratch.
[01:34:22.500 --> 01:34:26.500]  All mammals on the planet have two eyes, two ears,
[01:34:26.500 --> 01:34:30.500]  two nostrils, one mouth. All the eyes
[01:34:30.500 --> 01:34:34.500]  are in the front. Some fish should have some on the side like a sturgeon, but
[01:34:34.500 --> 01:34:38.500]  all mammals are
[01:34:38.500 --> 01:34:42.500]  90% the same DNA.
[01:34:42.500 --> 01:34:46.500]  If God made man,
[01:34:46.500 --> 01:34:50.500]  he had a lot of practice.
[01:34:50.500 --> 01:34:54.500]  As I get older and have more experience with animals,
[01:34:54.500 --> 01:34:58.500]  I'm beginning to wonder how much
[01:34:58.500 --> 01:35:02.500]  smarter we actually are than the animals.
[01:35:02.500 --> 01:35:06.500]  They just have a different kind of intelligence.
[01:35:06.500 --> 01:35:10.500]  Understand that a cat can understand
[01:35:10.500 --> 01:35:14.500]  up to 600 words.
[01:35:14.500 --> 01:35:18.500]  Dogs can understand what you want.
[01:35:18.500 --> 01:35:22.500]  Can you understand what dogs want?
[01:35:22.500 --> 01:35:26.500]  How many meows can you understand?
[01:35:26.500 --> 01:35:30.500]  Cats only meow to humans. They don't meow to each other.
[01:35:30.500 --> 01:35:34.500]  So just how smart
[01:35:34.500 --> 01:35:38.500]  are we after all?
[01:35:38.500 --> 01:35:42.500]  Autism is a great example.
[01:35:42.500 --> 01:35:46.500]  They don't call Asperger's syndrome that anymore.
[01:35:46.500 --> 01:35:50.500]  They include it in autism, but
[01:35:50.500 --> 01:35:54.500]  Asperger's syndrome is interesting because
[01:35:54.500 --> 01:35:58.500]  it appears, at least from my perspective,
[01:35:58.500 --> 01:36:02.500]  that everybody has approximately the same amount
[01:36:02.500 --> 01:36:06.500]  of innate intelligence.
[01:36:06.500 --> 01:36:10.500]  Where someone seems to be
[01:36:10.500 --> 01:36:14.500]  especially intelligent in one area,
[01:36:14.500 --> 01:36:18.500]  it's generally because they tend to focus more in that area.
[01:36:18.500 --> 01:36:22.500]  People who are good at one thing tend to stink at everything else.
[01:36:22.500 --> 01:36:26.500]  Einstein, the last interview with him,
[01:36:26.500 --> 01:36:30.500]  found him out on the college grounds.
[01:36:30.500 --> 01:36:34.500]  He had stepped into an open manhole cover and he was crawling out of it.
[01:36:34.500 --> 01:36:38.500]  He was so focused on what he was doing, he wouldn't pay attention to where he was at.
[01:36:38.500 --> 01:36:42.500]  I had someone recently tell me
[01:36:42.500 --> 01:36:46.500]  that her son
[01:36:46.500 --> 01:36:50.500]  who was 18 or 19
[01:36:50.500 --> 01:36:54.500]  had Asperger's.
[01:36:54.500 --> 01:36:58.500]  I asked him,
[01:36:58.500 --> 01:37:02.500]  what are you really good at?
[01:37:02.500 --> 01:37:06.500]  I don't think they understood where I was going.
[01:37:06.500 --> 01:37:10.500]  If you have Asperger's, you have focus.
[01:37:10.500 --> 01:37:14.500]  Extreme focus and
[01:37:14.500 --> 01:37:18.500]  uncontrolled extreme focus tends to move
[01:37:18.500 --> 01:37:22.500]  into autism.
[01:37:22.500 --> 01:37:26.500]  Your focus is in one place and you can't control it.
[01:37:26.500 --> 01:37:30.500]  Asperger's is just a degree of that focus.
[01:37:30.500 --> 01:37:34.500]  Concentration is just a lesser degree of that focus.
[01:37:34.500 --> 01:37:38.500]  It's all one continuum.
[01:37:38.500 --> 01:37:42.500]  Studying autism to understand animals,
[01:37:42.500 --> 01:37:46.500]  because animals are the only real difference
[01:37:46.500 --> 01:37:50.500]  I can see between humans and animals
[01:37:50.500 --> 01:37:54.500]  is that humans make dictionaries.
[01:37:54.500 --> 01:37:58.500]  Humans have
[01:37:58.500 --> 01:38:02.500]  experience. We're essentially born Tabula Rasa, blank slate.
[01:38:02.500 --> 01:38:06.500]  We have experience in the
[01:38:06.500 --> 01:38:10.500]  world and we give
[01:38:10.500 --> 01:38:14.500]  that experience names.
[01:38:14.500 --> 01:38:18.500]  We create realizations and understandings.
[01:38:18.500 --> 01:38:22.500]  We're like gods in that respect.
[01:38:22.500 --> 01:38:26.500]  Only the gods can do that besides us.
[01:38:26.500 --> 01:38:30.500]  We take a world that just is a world and we apply
[01:38:30.500 --> 01:38:34.500]  meaning to it. We do that by making dictionaries.
[01:38:34.500 --> 01:38:38.500]  That only, there's a lot
[01:38:38.500 --> 01:38:42.500]  of animals that are just as smart as we are. Kettle whales, brain,
[01:38:42.500 --> 01:38:46.500]  look how big they are. Brain to body mass?
[01:38:46.500 --> 01:38:50.500]  They're higher than ours or to our purpose in dolphins.
[01:38:50.500 --> 01:38:54.500]  Can you hear me? Yes.
[01:38:54.500 --> 01:38:58.500]  Randy, yes, okay. I agree with that. However, I think
[01:38:58.500 --> 01:39:02.500]  that some of those, what you're talking about, building dictionaries
[01:39:02.500 --> 01:39:06.500]  is, I don't know, well,
[01:39:06.500 --> 01:39:10.500]  it's good but it's incomplete. It's good but it's half the story.
[01:39:10.500 --> 01:39:14.500]  The other half of the story is, if I had to explain it to you, you wouldn't get it.
[01:39:14.500 --> 01:39:18.500]  Now, that's a quote I actually heard from somebody else.
[01:39:18.500 --> 01:39:22.500]  But I got to thinking about that and I compared that with the, I don't know if you're familiar
[01:39:22.500 --> 01:39:26.500]  with this one, it's a sheet of paper and there's one sentence on it and the one
[01:39:26.500 --> 01:39:30.500]  sentence says the only sentence on this sheet of paper is false.
[01:39:30.500 --> 01:39:34.500]  So, if the only sentence on this sheet of paper is false
[01:39:34.500 --> 01:39:38.500]  is that a true statement or a false statement? So, here we go playing with
[01:39:38.500 --> 01:39:42.500]  words. Now, I'm building off your dictionary statement. So, we're going playing with words
[01:39:42.500 --> 01:39:46.500]  in native tribes, they didn't have words but they kept the
[01:39:46.500 --> 01:39:50.500]  rules off. So, I'm kind of thinking that...
[01:39:50.500 --> 01:39:54.500]  Wait a minute, you said in native tribes they didn't have words?
[01:39:54.500 --> 01:39:58.500]  They didn't have written words, excuse me. Oh, okay, written words because
[01:39:58.500 --> 01:40:02.500]  I have never heard of a, any
[01:40:02.500 --> 01:40:06.500]  group of humans that did not have language.
[01:40:06.500 --> 01:40:10.500]  Yes, no, I'm sorry, I just misspoke. No, I recognize that words
[01:40:10.500 --> 01:40:14.500]  but they didn't have written language but they had laws. So, what we have
[01:40:14.500 --> 01:40:18.500]  is written laws but yet most of the people cannot
[01:40:18.500 --> 01:40:22.500]  comprehend the laws and I think it's because
[01:40:22.500 --> 01:40:26.500]  we are a, we talk and we write
[01:40:26.500 --> 01:40:30.500]  stories, I'm talking about us, okay, not the leadership, not the
[01:40:30.500 --> 01:40:34.500]  authority figures but us ourselves, we look at stupid television
[01:40:34.500 --> 01:40:38.500]  shows and we write intelligent books. You know, we do, we do all
[01:40:38.500 --> 01:40:42.500]  manner of things but yet at the same time we cannot
[01:40:42.500 --> 01:40:46.500]  comprehend the law as the masses we can. It's because
[01:40:46.500 --> 01:40:50.500]  we are more focused on, I have a lot of trouble with my own words,
[01:40:50.500 --> 01:40:54.500]  we're more focused on, I don't know, I don't want to say
[01:40:54.500 --> 01:40:58.500]  emotions but we're more focused on nonverbal
[01:40:58.500 --> 01:41:02.500]  cues like a dog can pick up and see where we're
[01:41:02.500 --> 01:41:06.500]  looking. They say that a dog is the only
[01:41:06.500 --> 01:41:10.500]  animal that can actually see what we're looking at and they will look at the same
[01:41:10.500 --> 01:41:14.500]  thing and if you point at something, they will
[01:41:14.500 --> 01:41:18.500]  pick up on your point. So, let me think.
[01:41:18.500 --> 01:41:22.500]  So, the sentence, the only sentence on this sheet of paper is
[01:41:22.500 --> 01:41:26.500]  false can be argued. Well, it's a false statement. Well, yeah, it's a true
[01:41:26.500 --> 01:41:30.500]  statement. It's a false statement. It's a true statement. Well, that's what we have for case law.
[01:41:30.500 --> 01:41:34.500]  That's what our law was built on is a statement that can
[01:41:34.500 --> 01:41:38.500]  be argued pro or con. Well, the problem
[01:41:38.500 --> 01:41:42.500]  with law is law is not
[01:41:42.500 --> 01:41:46.500]  perfect. Law is not complete.
[01:41:46.500 --> 01:41:50.500]  The law cannot address every possible
[01:41:50.500 --> 01:41:54.500]  permutation. Exactly, so
[01:41:54.500 --> 01:41:58.500]  the appeals court say we will judge this case
[01:41:58.500 --> 01:42:02.500]  individually as we do most cases.
[01:42:02.500 --> 01:42:06.500]  I capture quotes like that all the time. You know, this is always about
[01:42:06.500 --> 01:42:10.500]  immunity, absolute immunity, official
[01:42:10.500 --> 01:42:14.500]  immunity. So, we'll judge this individually. Well, what I'm wondering
[01:42:14.500 --> 01:42:18.500]  is what I call life limiting the pursuit of freedom is to jump in my car
[01:42:18.500 --> 01:42:22.500]  and go to the lake and go fishing. And yet, the state
[01:42:22.500 --> 01:42:26.500]  says you have to have a license to do that. So,
[01:42:26.500 --> 01:42:30.500]  I'm going, well, let's see. Why don't we say that that's life
[01:42:30.500 --> 01:42:34.500]  limiting the pursuit of happiness and judge each individual case
[01:42:34.500 --> 01:42:38.500]  individually? Instead of judging each officer's immunity
[01:42:38.500 --> 01:42:42.500]  individually, let's judge each and every person's
[01:42:42.500 --> 01:42:46.500]  definition of life limiting the pursuit of happiness individually. And what you're going to
[01:42:46.500 --> 01:42:50.500]  find out real soon is that everybody does pretty much the same thing.
[01:42:50.500 --> 01:42:54.500]  They don't mess with anybody else. So, why are we
[01:42:54.500 --> 01:42:58.500]  regulating each other? I don't know. That's my little
[01:42:58.500 --> 01:43:02.500]  guess. I hope that makes sense. Have you ever read my document
[01:43:02.500 --> 01:43:06.500]  The Rubber Ball Theory? Yes, sir.
[01:43:06.500 --> 01:43:10.500]  Yes, sir. I took a lot of notes on it and I've been on reading it a couple more times.
[01:43:10.500 --> 01:43:14.500]  I can't say this. Most of my book through, you know, if I get a book I might not
[01:43:14.500 --> 01:43:18.500]  read it for six months, you know, because I've got stuff I'm trying to give to all of you.
[01:43:18.500 --> 01:43:22.500]  Okay. That was only about 16, 17 pages.
[01:43:22.500 --> 01:43:26.500]  Well, I enlarged it. Make it easier to read without reading glasses. But, yeah,
[01:43:26.500 --> 01:43:30.500]  I read it. I read the whole thing. I had to read it in two
[01:43:30.500 --> 01:43:34.500]  steadings because I got preoccupied. But, yeah, I took notes. I've been
[01:43:34.500 --> 01:43:38.500]  thinking about sharing them with you. But, you know, you stay pretty busy too.
[01:43:38.500 --> 01:43:42.500]  Yeah, I do. And I'm about to get even more busy
[01:43:42.500 --> 01:43:46.500]  because my electronic lawyer project is about
[01:43:46.500 --> 01:43:50.500]  to take off. We're in a really good spot for that.
[01:43:50.500 --> 01:43:54.500]  But once I get it launched, then I can back away from it a little bit. Hang on
[01:43:54.500 --> 01:43:58.500]  about to go to break, Randy Kelton. Reel on radio. We'll be right back.
[01:44:24.500 --> 01:44:28.500]  This is not Marijuana. And Marijuana is not him. They are different varieties
[01:44:28.500 --> 01:44:32.500]  of the same species. HempUSA.org wants the world to know
[01:44:32.500 --> 01:44:36.500]  these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder
[01:44:36.500 --> 01:44:40.500]  is the best kept health secret you need to know about. Remember, hemp
[01:44:40.500 --> 01:44:44.500]  protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free,
[01:44:44.500 --> 01:44:48.500]  anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.500 --> 01:44:52.500]  Call 888-910-4367. 888-910-4367.
[01:44:52.500 --> 01:44:56.500]  And see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you.
[01:44:56.500 --> 01:45:00.500]  Only at hempUSA.org.
[01:45:00.500 --> 01:45:04.500]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.500 --> 01:45:08.500]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:08.500 --> 01:45:12.500]  The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you
[01:45:12.500 --> 01:45:16.500]  how in 24 hours you step by step. If you have a lawyer,
[01:45:16.500 --> 01:45:20.500]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:45:20.500 --> 01:45:24.500]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have
[01:45:24.500 --> 01:45:28.500]  won with our step by step course. And now you can too.
[01:45:28.500 --> 01:45:32.500]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years
[01:45:32.500 --> 01:45:36.500]  of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:36.500 --> 01:45:40.500]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles
[01:45:40.500 --> 01:45:44.500]  and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[01:45:44.500 --> 01:45:48.500]  our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[01:45:48.500 --> 01:45:52.500]  for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.500 --> 01:45:56.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.500 --> 01:46:20.500]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:20.500 --> 01:46:24.500]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio. We're talking to Ralph in Texas.
[01:46:24.500 --> 01:46:28.500]  And the reason I brought up the rubber ball theories
[01:46:28.500 --> 01:46:32.500]  we're talking about how the brain
[01:46:32.500 --> 01:46:36.500]  does what it does. The rubber ball theory
[01:46:36.500 --> 01:46:40.500]  is based on a
[01:46:40.500 --> 01:46:44.500]  different way of thinking about how
[01:46:44.500 --> 01:46:48.500]  the brain does what it does. I'm
[01:46:48.500 --> 01:46:52.500]  trained as an engineer. And engineers, we only know
[01:46:52.500 --> 01:46:56.500]  how to connect dots. When I first started looking
[01:46:56.500 --> 01:47:00.500]  into psychology, I read all of these
[01:47:00.500 --> 01:47:04.500]  highly sophisticated psychological metaphors,
[01:47:04.500 --> 01:47:08.500]  PSJA, Freud,
[01:47:08.500 --> 01:47:12.500]  Pearls. Everybody
[01:47:12.500 --> 01:47:16.500]  seemed to have a different story to describe
[01:47:16.500 --> 01:47:20.500]  how the living mind worked.
[01:47:20.500 --> 01:47:24.500]  The only one who had any kind of an actual model
[01:47:24.500 --> 01:47:28.500]  was Freud. But Freud was nuts.
[01:47:28.500 --> 01:47:32.500]  He was certifiable. And finally, the psychological community
[01:47:32.500 --> 01:47:36.500]  finally realized Freud was nuts and most of
[01:47:36.500 --> 01:47:40.500]  his theories were not very well founded.
[01:47:40.500 --> 01:47:44.500]  They pretty well debunked Freud. They threw out Freud's work.
[01:47:44.500 --> 01:47:48.500]  But they threw out his model. They should have kept the model.
[01:47:48.500 --> 01:47:52.500]  Because right now we don't have one. We don't have a way
[01:47:52.500 --> 01:47:56.500]  of organizing human behavior.
[01:47:56.500 --> 01:48:00.500]  Most psychologists treat the living mind
[01:48:00.500 --> 01:48:04.500]  as if it is far too complex for any
[01:48:04.500 --> 01:48:08.500]  individual human to ever understand.
[01:48:08.500 --> 01:48:12.500]  And I was frustrated by that until I came across neuro-linguistic programming.
[01:48:12.500 --> 01:48:16.500]  There's a lot of stuff out there on neuro-linguistic
[01:48:16.500 --> 01:48:20.500]  programming right now, in LP. And most of what I see in the last
[01:48:20.500 --> 01:48:24.500]  20 years is trash. But the original works
[01:48:24.500 --> 01:48:28.500]  by Grinder, Bandelier, Bateson, I mean Watson,
[01:48:28.500 --> 01:48:32.500]  Thomas,
[01:48:32.500 --> 01:48:36.500]  there were a number of them that produced
[01:48:36.500 --> 01:48:40.500]  some very good work. The first ones were Grinder and Bandelier.
[01:48:40.500 --> 01:48:44.500]  And they treated the living mind as if it was ultimately understandable.
[01:48:44.500 --> 01:48:48.500]  As if
[01:48:48.500 --> 01:48:52.500]  people followed a
[01:48:52.500 --> 01:48:56.500]  definable set of behaviors
[01:48:56.500 --> 01:49:00.500]  in a book called Frogs to Princes. They start out by saying,
[01:49:00.500 --> 01:49:04.500]  okay, who has a phobia? Today we're going to do phobias.
[01:49:04.500 --> 01:49:08.500]  Now, wait, wait, wait, wait. Don't tell us what your phobia is.
[01:49:08.500 --> 01:49:12.500]  Because if you tell us what your phobia is, we'll think we know something about it and then we'll hallucinate
[01:49:12.500 --> 01:49:16.500]  and maybe do all kind of crazy stuff. Do this step, do this step, do this step.
[01:49:16.500 --> 01:49:20.500]  You get rid of the phobia. You do a multiple disassociation.
[01:49:20.500 --> 01:49:24.500]  Then imagine an
[01:49:24.500 --> 01:49:28.500]  experience disassociated from whatever your phobic experience is
[01:49:28.500 --> 01:49:32.500]  and then gradually move from a triple disassociation
[01:49:32.500 --> 01:49:36.500]  to a double to a single. And then have the
[01:49:36.500 --> 01:49:40.500]  internal mental experience yourself and you'll get rid of the phobia.
[01:49:40.500 --> 01:49:44.500]  Because every time it doesn't matter what your phobia is, the facts don't matter.
[01:49:44.500 --> 01:49:48.500]  Follow this pattern and it works.
[01:49:48.500 --> 01:49:52.500]  They developed a number of tools this way
[01:49:52.500 --> 01:49:56.500]  that were very effective and it led me to speculate
[01:49:56.500 --> 01:50:00.500]  that underneath all this
[01:50:00.500 --> 01:50:04.500]  there is a consistent set of patterns
[01:50:04.500 --> 01:50:08.500]  and I didn't experiment.
[01:50:08.500 --> 01:50:12.500]  I imagined that I was an alien
[01:50:12.500 --> 01:50:16.500]  zoologist sent down to a backwater
[01:50:16.500 --> 01:50:20.500]  corner of the galaxy to examine
[01:50:20.500 --> 01:50:24.500]  this creature, Homo sapiens sapiens
[01:50:24.500 --> 01:50:28.500]  and that was done for disassociation.
[01:50:28.500 --> 01:50:32.500]  What can we tell about this creature from observation? I can't dissect it.
[01:50:32.500 --> 01:50:36.500]  I can't interfere with it. I can't even talk to it. I can just watch.
[01:50:36.500 --> 01:50:40.500]  What could I tell about this creature from observation?
[01:50:40.500 --> 01:50:44.500]  And I created a map of their behavior.
[01:50:44.500 --> 01:50:48.500]  If anybody is interested in it send me a
[01:50:48.500 --> 01:50:52.500]  email asking for my cognitive map
[01:50:52.500 --> 01:50:56.500]  and I'll send you a map of the living mind.
[01:50:56.500 --> 01:51:00.500]  Now it may not be right or it's certainly not right.
[01:51:00.500 --> 01:51:04.500]  But it gives a very structured method
[01:51:04.500 --> 01:51:08.500]  of organizing human behavior and based on
[01:51:08.500 --> 01:51:12.500]  that map I developed this
[01:51:12.500 --> 01:51:16.500]  book or this pamphlet, this
[01:51:16.500 --> 01:51:20.500]  17 page I think it is pamphlet, the rubber ball theory.
[01:51:20.500 --> 01:51:24.500]  It grew right out of
[01:51:24.500 --> 01:51:28.500]  this map and what the
[01:51:28.500 --> 01:51:32.500]  map predicts and what the rubber ball theory presents
[01:51:32.500 --> 01:51:36.500]  is that things are not the
[01:51:36.500 --> 01:51:40.500]  way the conscious aspect of the living mind gives
[01:51:40.500 --> 01:51:44.500]  us the impression that it is.
[01:51:44.500 --> 01:51:48.500]  The conscious awareness
[01:51:48.500 --> 01:51:52.500]  is not the dominant aspect of the living mind.
[01:51:52.500 --> 01:51:56.500]  We live inside ourselves and we experience the world
[01:51:56.500 --> 01:52:00.500]  around us from the conscious aspect and
[01:52:00.500 --> 01:52:04.500]  that aspect gives us the impression that the conscious
[01:52:04.500 --> 01:52:08.500]  aspect is the dominant aspect and that is simply not
[01:52:08.500 --> 01:52:12.500]  true. And another
[01:52:12.500 --> 01:52:16.500]  realization this should generate
[01:52:16.500 --> 01:52:20.500]  and that is that
[01:52:20.500 --> 01:52:24.500]  emotions are not nouns, they're verbs. I don't want to go into
[01:52:24.500 --> 01:52:28.500]  too much of that here but when you understand
[01:52:28.500 --> 01:52:32.500]  that emotions are not nouns but they're verbs it
[01:52:32.500 --> 01:52:36.500]  will open up a whole level of communication
[01:52:36.500 --> 01:52:40.500]  that's not subliminal. It's been out there in front of you
[01:52:40.500 --> 01:52:44.500]  all the time but it's been hidden from
[01:52:44.500 --> 01:52:48.500]  our conscious focus because of the definitions
[01:52:48.500 --> 01:52:52.500]  we assigned to certain aspects of our experience.
[01:52:52.500 --> 01:52:56.500]  Now is that sufficiently cryptic?
[01:52:56.500 --> 01:53:00.500]  I don't mean it to be.
[01:53:00.500 --> 01:53:04.500]  I've delivered the rubber ball theory
[01:53:04.500 --> 01:53:08.500]  on here a couple of times but it's not very effective that way it's much better if you read it.
[01:53:08.500 --> 01:53:12.500]  If anybody's interested in it send me a
[01:53:12.500 --> 01:53:16.500]  email I'll send it to you but be warned
[01:53:16.500 --> 01:53:20.500]  it will change your life
[01:53:20.500 --> 01:53:24.500]  if I've done my job well and you
[01:53:24.500 --> 01:53:28.500]  understand and the internal
[01:53:28.500 --> 01:53:32.500]  patterns and metaphors that I use in there
[01:53:32.500 --> 01:53:36.500]  have the intended effect
[01:53:36.500 --> 01:53:40.500]  you will begin to communicate on a whole level of awareness
[01:53:40.500 --> 01:53:44.500]  that's outside the awareness of most people around you, I have no idea
[01:53:44.500 --> 01:53:48.500]  and you will be able to affect change in
[01:53:48.500 --> 01:53:52.500]  other people once you understand the rubber ball theory
[01:53:52.500 --> 01:53:56.500]  and how it works. You can watch a psychiatrist work
[01:53:56.500 --> 01:54:00.500]  it will be absolutely clear what he's doing
[01:54:00.500 --> 01:54:04.500]  and for the most part it will be clear that he doesn't know
[01:54:04.500 --> 01:54:08.500]  what he's doing. He's doing these
[01:54:08.500 --> 01:54:12.500]  methods and incantations but underneath
[01:54:12.500 --> 01:54:16.500]  what he's doing there are a set of specific tactics
[01:54:16.500 --> 01:54:20.500]  that he's using that he's covering up with some elaborate
[01:54:20.500 --> 01:54:24.500]  metaphor. What the rubber ball theory does
[01:54:24.500 --> 01:54:28.500]  is it takes out an underlying pattern that you can use
[01:54:28.500 --> 01:54:32.500]  all by itself without any metaphor attached to it and affect
[01:54:32.500 --> 01:54:36.500]  dramatic positive change in other people
[01:54:36.500 --> 01:54:40.500]  if you're interested send me an email I won't waste any more time on that
[01:54:40.500 --> 01:54:44.500]  one of the most valuable things
[01:54:44.500 --> 01:54:48.500]  I own and once you understand the rubber ball theory
[01:54:48.500 --> 01:54:52.500]  then you listen to some of my stories and you'll recognize some of the things
[01:54:52.500 --> 01:54:56.500]  that I'm doing in these stories because I use those tools
[01:54:56.500 --> 01:55:00.500]  in a lot of the stories that I tell on the air.
[01:55:00.500 --> 01:55:04.500]  Most of the stories are true because I also use the rubber ball theory
[01:55:04.500 --> 01:55:08.500]  on people that I deal with.
[01:55:08.500 --> 01:55:12.500]  Okay with that said I do have another caller
[01:55:12.500 --> 01:55:16.500]  Ralph do you have anything else for us?
[01:55:16.500 --> 01:55:20.500]  We appreciate it Randy. Okay thank you Ralph. Now we're going to go
[01:55:20.500 --> 01:55:24.500]  to Eric in Georgia. Hello Eric.
[01:55:24.500 --> 01:55:28.500]  How are you doing tonight? Doing good. What do you
[01:55:28.500 --> 01:55:32.500]  have for us today? Well I got
[01:55:32.500 --> 01:55:36.500]  out of one problem and fell into another.
[01:55:36.500 --> 01:55:40.500]  I was the guy that had to pick it and got out of it and then
[01:55:40.500 --> 01:55:44.500]  what happened was I was coming home Thursday night from work
[01:55:44.500 --> 01:55:48.500]  and they pulled me over for improper language usage
[01:55:48.500 --> 01:55:52.500]  and the fact that Kaila
[01:55:52.500 --> 01:55:56.500]  and they pulled me over and I pulled onto the convenience store
[01:55:56.500 --> 01:56:00.500]  pulling him and
[01:56:00.500 --> 01:56:04.500]  I had my license ready for him
[01:56:04.500 --> 01:56:08.500]  and I gave it to him and he started immediately asking
[01:56:08.500 --> 01:56:12.500]  questions like where are you coming from? Where are you going?
[01:56:12.500 --> 01:56:16.500]  Basically he thought I was BUI. He thought I was coming from a bar or something.
[01:56:16.500 --> 01:56:20.500]  So I said sir I don't answer questions. I'd rather you know just move on.
[01:56:20.500 --> 01:56:24.500]  He didn't say anything. I respect that. I respect that.
[01:56:24.500 --> 01:56:28.500]  But not to me. His sergeant pulled up behind me
[01:56:28.500 --> 01:56:32.500]  and he got out and started trying to play good cop bad cop with me.
[01:56:32.500 --> 01:56:36.500]  I don't want to participate in your fishing expedition sir.
[01:56:36.500 --> 01:56:40.500]  So he went back to the first police
[01:56:40.500 --> 01:56:44.500]  officer, went back and pulled me over. He started writing tickets
[01:56:44.500 --> 01:56:48.500]  and he gave me the two tickets for him. The fat equipment.
[01:56:48.500 --> 01:56:52.500]  Favourite to maintain a lane. And he started asking
[01:56:52.500 --> 01:56:56.500]  me basically that you've been drinking them out. So I said I won't answer questions.
[01:56:56.500 --> 01:57:00.500]  And I told him I said sir I said
[01:57:00.500 --> 01:57:04.500]  where do I do this? I said let me ask you some questions. I said I see you threw out your tickets here.
[01:57:04.500 --> 01:57:08.500]  Did I violate every element of both of these charges?
[01:57:08.500 --> 01:57:12.500]  And he said yes sir yes you did. I said is that your legal
[01:57:12.500 --> 01:57:16.500]  conclusion? He said yes. Now I'm just blabbering you know. I ain't saying
[01:57:16.500 --> 01:57:20.500]  this is any good or not to tell you what it was said. So I said
[01:57:20.500 --> 01:57:24.500]  okay. And he said before I signed these tickets I said what if I don't sign these tickets?
[01:57:24.500 --> 01:57:28.500]  Are you going to take me to see the judge? He said no.
[01:57:28.500 --> 01:57:32.500]  I'm going to take you straight to jail. I said well
[01:57:32.500 --> 01:57:36.500]  I said you're not going to take me to see the judge? He said no.
[01:57:36.500 --> 01:57:38.500]  He said straight to jail I'll take your bond and you'll be
[01:57:38.500 --> 01:57:42.500]  if you can pay your bond you'll be released. I said okay well sir is your
[01:57:42.500 --> 01:57:46.500]  cameras on? Or both of your cameras on? Your sergeant and yours? He said both of them said
[01:57:46.500 --> 01:57:50.500]  yes. So he asked for the badge numbers and he gave that all to me.
[01:57:50.500 --> 01:57:54.500]  I was released and I heard you tonight talking about your traffic west side. I know about that.
[01:57:54.500 --> 01:57:58.500]  I'm going to go tomorrow afternoon and get on the west side and
[01:57:58.500 --> 01:58:02.500]  download my you know the resources that you have there. And I was
[01:58:02.500 --> 01:58:06.500]  wondering is it me talking to you? Anything good for me whatsoever?
[01:58:06.500 --> 01:58:10.500]  Or should I just shut my mouth completely after that? I'm not going to answer questions.
[01:58:10.500 --> 01:58:14.500]  I got another question also. In Georgia
[01:58:14.500 --> 01:58:18.500]  when you give your license you're given it in lieu
[01:58:18.500 --> 01:58:22.500]  of bail. So even if I ask to see
[01:58:22.500 --> 01:58:26.500]  the judge they don't have to do it because technically I've already gave
[01:58:26.500 --> 01:58:30.500]  my license in lieu of the bail. So and they can believe they're going to believe
[01:58:30.500 --> 01:58:34.500]  it. Okay wait wait hold on, we're about to go to break.
[01:58:34.500 --> 01:58:38.500]  Randy Kelton, Real Law Radio are calling number 512646
[01:58:38.500 --> 01:58:42.500]  1984. We'll be right back.
[01:58:50.500 --> 01:58:54.500]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. Yet countless
[01:58:54.500 --> 01:58:58.500]  readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.500 --> 01:59:02.500]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:02.500 --> 01:59:06.500]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.500 --> 01:59:10.500]  Enter the recovery version. First this new
[01:59:10.500 --> 01:59:14.500]  translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story
[01:59:14.500 --> 01:59:18.500]  is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.500 --> 01:59:22.500]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way
[01:59:22.500 --> 01:59:26.500]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've
[01:59:26.500 --> 01:59:30.500]  experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you
[01:59:30.500 --> 01:59:34.500]  a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive
[01:59:34.500 --> 01:59:38.500]  yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free
[01:59:38.500 --> 01:59:42.500]  at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:42.500 --> 01:59:46.500]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[01:59:46.500 --> 01:59:50.500]  That's freestudybible.com
[01:59:50.500 --> 01:59:54.500]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:59:54.500 --> 01:59:58.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com