ROL_2018-09-14_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:29.720]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22 an ounce.
[00:29.720 --> 00:35.080]  It's over $16.68 an ounce. Texas Crude $65.51 a barrel.
[00:35.080 --> 00:41.240]  Bitcoins at $6,902.19. Ethereum at $420.80.
[00:41.240 --> 00:55.680]  Bitcoin Cash at $652.90. Finely Lite Coins at $114.34 a crypto coin.
[00:55.680 --> 01:01.400]  Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01.400 --> 01:06.840]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion,
[01:06.840 --> 01:11.520]  sex, or national origin. It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration
[01:11.520 --> 01:16.920]  requirements, racial segregation in public schools, and employment, and public accommodations
[01:16.920 --> 01:24.160]  for places of business. Today in History.
[01:24.160 --> 01:28.320]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack on
[01:28.320 --> 01:32.480]  civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:32.480 --> 01:36.920]  is being blamed on the democratically elected President of Syria Bashar al-Assad by the
[01:36.920 --> 01:41.680]  United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:41.680 --> 01:46.520]  evidence as of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows
[01:46.520 --> 01:50.600]  to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will
[01:50.600 --> 01:55.200]  be coming in nice and new and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners
[01:55.200 --> 01:59.640]  with a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it. Many in the West, including
[01:59.640 --> 02:04.720]  President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted
[02:04.720 --> 02:09.840]  by Assad and his forces. Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since
[02:09.840 --> 02:14.160]  yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side
[02:14.160 --> 02:19.000]  of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's
[02:19.000 --> 02:23.080]  seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and
[02:23.080 --> 02:28.320]  anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS
[02:28.320 --> 02:32.720]  being one of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels. Now,
[02:32.720 --> 02:38.080]  surprised then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook
[02:38.080 --> 02:42.400]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[02:42.400 --> 02:47.320]  has been fighting terrorists, or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[02:47.320 --> 02:51.040]  strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at.
[02:51.040 --> 03:16.040]  This was quick roadie with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[03:16.040 --> 03:23.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rural Law Radio, and we're talking to Scott and Michigan.
[03:23.040 --> 03:24.040]  Okay, Scott.
[03:24.040 --> 03:29.200]  Yeah, I'm sorry, the timeline is confusing. I mean, there's all points along the way at
[03:29.200 --> 03:32.800]  which I could have pulled the pin and sprayed the fire extinguisher on this whole thing,
[03:32.800 --> 03:34.800]  but I like to watch it burn.
[03:34.800 --> 03:40.360]  I'll just let it unfold, see what happens, see how many people. I mean, now I've got
[03:40.360 --> 03:47.360]  two cops, a judge, a clerk, and four prosecutors in my little imaginary jail cell.
[03:47.360 --> 03:58.000]  Wonderful. Always like it. I had someone earlier from Colorado, but I was afraid to
[03:58.000 --> 04:04.600]  tell him to do this because he had a big-time dog in the hunt, and he could wind up losing
[04:04.600 --> 04:13.520]  his liberty. But in your case, it's just a traffic ticket. So it's probably the cheapest
[04:13.520 --> 04:20.800]  legal education you'll ever get, and hopefully it'll wind up like Scott, you'll realize
[04:20.800 --> 04:28.920]  how much fun this can be once you get the procedure down. And it looks like you're
[04:28.920 --> 04:37.920]  coming along pretty good. But look at, have you read the penal code in Michigan?
[04:37.920 --> 04:38.920]  Yes.
[04:38.920 --> 04:49.320]  Good. Then when I do this, I'm always looking for how can I lead them into what at least
[04:49.320 --> 04:59.320]  has the appearance of violation of a penal law. And the more obscure it is, the better.
[04:59.320 --> 05:07.320]  I find I barely have to lead them. I just let it unfold, and they make their own mistakes.
[05:07.320 --> 05:14.520]  That's what I tell people is these guys are very accommodating. When you want to get
[05:14.520 --> 05:19.920]  some criminal complaints to file against them, they are incredibly accommodating because
[05:19.920 --> 05:27.560]  they tend to have this idea that they are immune from the very laws that they're employed
[05:27.560 --> 05:37.000]  to enforce. And for me, that's the best part, is taking those laws that they're there to
[05:37.000 --> 05:40.240]  enforce and turning it back against them.
[05:40.240 --> 05:51.080]  Yep. And when they realize that you're there for the purpose of setting them up, that's
[05:51.080 --> 05:55.320]  when it becomes all the more powerful. Because by this time, by the time they realize you're
[05:55.320 --> 06:03.760]  setting them up, they've already got themselves in so deep they can't get out. And you give
[06:03.760 --> 06:08.600]  them opportunities, you make more mistakes, and they feel like they have no option but
[06:08.600 --> 06:15.840]  to just keep fighting and hope that nobody down the line will ever pick up the ball and
[06:15.840 --> 06:20.240]  hold them responsible. And it just keeps getting worse on.
[06:20.240 --> 06:21.240]  Yes.
[06:21.240 --> 06:30.320]  So keep it up, keep us up to speed, and don't have too much fun because it can get to be
[06:30.320 --> 06:31.320]  a lot of fun.
[06:31.320 --> 06:43.240]  Oh, one other thing. You might send them a bill for the hearings they order you to come
[06:43.240 --> 06:50.560]  to that they didn't have something legal or specific they were supposed to do, like they
[06:50.560 --> 06:55.600]  ordered you to come to an arraignment hearing but they didn't intend to have a judge there.
[06:55.600 --> 07:01.760]  Yeah, they did that for sure. Like they called me out for the same pre-trial conference twice.
[07:01.760 --> 07:09.600]  Oh, you should bill them both times. And bill them what a lawyer would charge, a couple
[07:09.600 --> 07:11.160]  hundred bucks an hour.
[07:11.160 --> 07:14.040]  Plus driving an hour and all that stuff.
[07:14.040 --> 07:24.440]  Yes, send the bill to the mayor accusing them of abuse process and forcing you to have to
[07:24.440 --> 07:29.600]  expend these funds. That's one of the ways they try to, anyone who tries to fight a ticket,
[07:29.600 --> 07:33.600]  that's how they beat them is they force them to come to court and then come back and come
[07:33.600 --> 07:42.720]  back and come back. So if you start filing invoices with the city, that's telling them,
[07:42.720 --> 07:46.960]  or with the municipality, that's telling them that you're going to sue them for this when
[07:46.960 --> 07:52.200]  they're done. Now they're going to have to justify these hearings and show that these
[07:52.200 --> 07:56.440]  hearings were lawful.
[07:56.440 --> 08:00.600]  And you might even get a precedent that they're not going to want you to have. I was hoping
[08:00.600 --> 08:09.760]  Dan Reel would call them tonight. But apparently he didn't. He's running for Congress and he
[08:09.760 --> 08:21.160]  just got a big win for the libertarian party where the city mayor sent the police out to
[08:21.160 --> 08:28.160]  stop them from having a rally. And he sued the city and they settled with them and paid
[08:28.160 --> 08:38.360]  the libertarian party cash, 35 grand. And apparently this has never happened before.
[08:38.360 --> 08:45.840]  But then Dan Reel's been beating them up big time in Connecticut. And the more we can get
[08:45.840 --> 08:54.600]  like this, the more we'll soften up these courts. Okay. Thank you very much, Scott. And
[08:54.600 --> 08:58.440]  keep us up to date on how this is going.
[08:58.440 --> 08:59.440]  You got it.
[08:59.440 --> 09:04.520]  Okay. Now we're going to go to Tim in Texas. Hello, Tim.
[09:04.520 --> 09:07.320]  Hello, sir.
[09:07.320 --> 09:10.680]  What do you have for us today?
[09:10.680 --> 09:19.480]  Well, we've got to come up with all the paperwork. So Laura's been over here making copies of
[09:19.480 --> 09:28.720]  everything that we can get our hands on to, I guess we're going to mail them to them.
[09:28.720 --> 09:34.200]  We have to drive over there in person. Laura says we have to drive over there to Frisco.
[09:34.200 --> 09:41.200]  So I didn't really want to do that. That's kind of quite a drive.
[09:41.200 --> 09:44.200]  Oh, heck with that. Email it to them.
[09:44.200 --> 09:47.960]  Oh, we can't. I don't think we can email it. It's too many pages. It's all the trusts
[09:47.960 --> 09:54.440]  and everything else that we've got set up. So have you looked as a bond?
[09:54.440 --> 09:59.000]  Well, we haven't had a chance to because we're trying to figure out how we can. We tried
[09:59.000 --> 10:04.880]  to look at all of our assets today and we found out we didn't have quite what we thought
[10:04.880 --> 10:14.400]  we did. So we may go to Wells Fargo Monday and see what they have to say. That's what
[10:14.400 --> 10:20.400]  a question I had. I don't know if you have access to a computer there where you can look
[10:20.400 --> 10:36.160]  at the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Chapter 24, and it talks about a bond for that. So
[10:36.160 --> 10:43.480]  you can put it up, but you have to find somebody to do it. That's the issue that I don't really
[10:43.480 --> 10:53.000]  have any experience at. I actually talked to Ken Magnuson, and he says he's not real
[10:53.000 --> 11:05.200]  familiar with it himself, but it talks about amount of bond, deposit, or security. So what
[11:05.200 --> 11:16.520]  do you have to come up with to do it? Let's see here. When a judgment is for money, the
[11:16.520 --> 11:24.520]  amount of the bond, deposit, or security must equal the sum of compensatory damages awarded
[11:24.520 --> 11:33.080]  in the judgment, interest for the estimated duration of the appeal, and cost awarded in
[11:33.080 --> 11:41.440]  the judgment. So are they saying that this has to be when it talks about the estimated
[11:41.440 --> 11:50.000]  duration of the appeal? So it's just interest. That's just an interest rate, and that only
[11:50.000 --> 11:56.720]  matters if you lose the appeal. Yes, sir. And the likelihood of you losing this appeal
[11:56.720 --> 12:06.800]  is extremely low. Yes, sir. The court has already hammered them once, and the big thing
[12:06.800 --> 12:15.200]  in the appeal is you're a $300,000 suit against them, that the judge dismissed with prejudice.
[12:15.200 --> 12:23.040]  Yes, sir. That is a big deal, huh? The court may not overturn the dismissal, but they will
[12:23.040 --> 12:29.480]  almost certainly overturn the dismissal with prejudice, and when that happens, then your
[12:29.480 --> 12:42.400]  $300,000 claim against them is back on. Okay. So that would cover the $80,000 they're claiming
[12:42.400 --> 12:48.640]  as tender by set off. Tender by set off? I've never heard that.
[12:48.640 --> 12:57.360]  Yes, when you win the $300,000 claim is primarily based on, you only have to win one element,
[12:57.360 --> 13:04.760]  based on the fact that the original adjudication was improper, and the court of appeals has
[13:04.760 --> 13:11.360]  already ruled that it is improper. That's resjudicata, so that's a done deal.
[13:11.360 --> 13:21.280]  Ken and I were talking, and we were wondering what it was. He thinks that they gave this
[13:21.280 --> 13:28.720]  judge an opportunity so that he didn't look bad by not just going ahead and dismissing
[13:28.720 --> 13:35.040]  the entire thing themselves. Yes, and the judge didn't take the opportunity.
[13:35.040 --> 13:42.000]  He had an opportunity to go and say, well, under the light of new evidence, I see that
[13:42.000 --> 13:48.600]  this case is over time, but he didn't do that. No, he didn't. That may be because, I hate
[13:48.600 --> 13:52.720]  to say it, but it may be because I'm involved in it.
[13:52.720 --> 14:07.040]  He looks like he's at that age where it may not even bother him. He may be like, I could
[14:07.040 --> 14:17.120]  be out playing golf instead of doing this. I really don't understand why he's just completely
[14:17.120 --> 14:24.240]  ignoring law, but he had a spit. He's got a great reputation as an attorney.
[14:24.240 --> 14:28.200]  Yes, he does. When you mention his name, everybody goes,
[14:28.200 --> 14:34.880]  Spock Smith? Yeah. Ooh. I mean, that's what they, I mean, they're in awe, you know.
[14:34.880 --> 14:41.040]  He likes Spock, and he was, he would have had a reputation of being one of the smartest
[14:41.040 --> 14:49.360]  lawyers in the county. Right. Why he's doing this, I have no idea. Right. It just doesn't
[14:49.360 --> 14:55.200]  make sense, something, I don't know what's going on here. Maybe he was good friends with
[14:55.200 --> 15:02.840]  the previous judge. I don't know, but him and Kathy seemed to get along well. I hammered
[15:02.840 --> 15:08.880]  the previous judge pretty bad, and while I had criminal charges against the previous
[15:08.880 --> 15:17.120]  judge, he died of a heart attack. So maybe Brock blames me for that. I don't know. Some
[15:17.120 --> 15:22.240]  pure speculation there. At the end of the day, this is not, he's not
[15:22.240 --> 15:27.120]  going to make it through the court of appeals and the supreme, and certainly not through
[15:27.120 --> 15:33.520]  the feds. Way too many claims against them. So this is the last hurrah. This is the last
[15:33.520 --> 15:41.320]  thing they can do to you. And if you block them with a bond, then there's nothing left
[15:41.320 --> 15:51.040]  for them to do. Now they have to start defending their position against a different court.
[15:51.040 --> 15:58.040]  My issue is, if I call the court, the court of appeal, well, wait a minute, let's go back
[15:58.040 --> 16:04.640]  a little bit. Are we going to try to do the motion for a new trial just to buy a little
[16:04.640 --> 16:06.840]  more time? Yes.
[16:06.840 --> 16:16.560]  To see what he says. Yes, I think there's seven days to get that in, and generally that's
[16:16.560 --> 16:24.320]  part of the process. Preparing a motion for a new trial, you generally prepare a findings
[16:24.320 --> 16:35.320]  of fact and conclusions at law in that you highlight the facts and show the law as it
[16:35.320 --> 16:41.920]  should apply to the facts. And the ledge that the judge erred in failing to apply this law
[16:41.920 --> 16:51.000]  to those facts. And if you give him findings of fact, the judge is almost certainly going
[16:51.000 --> 16:58.480]  to, he's going to deny it no matter what you do. But what he may do is just sit on it and
[16:58.480 --> 16:59.480]  do nothing.
[16:59.480 --> 17:10.360]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[17:10.360 --> 17:17.600]  Gunworks. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance
[17:17.600 --> 17:23.840]  to win. From Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical
[17:23.840 --> 17:30.840]  AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[17:30.840 --> 17:36.880]  Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get ten
[17:36.880 --> 17:43.680]  chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the
[17:43.680 --> 17:49.360]  shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality
[17:49.360 --> 17:55.440]  programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Go to
[17:55.440 --> 18:00.720]  LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.720 --> 18:06.080]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses? Stop
[18:06.080 --> 18:10.800]  debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method. Michael Mearris has won six
[18:10.800 --> 18:16.040]  cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step
[18:16.040 --> 18:21.320]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.320 --> 18:26.280]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons. How to answer letters and phone
[18:26.280 --> 18:30.960]  calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial tables
[18:30.960 --> 18:37.040]  on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution
[18:37.040 --> 18:41.800]  for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more
[18:41.800 --> 18:47.040]  information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:47.040 --> 18:56.480]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[18:56.480 --> 19:00.480]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:00.480 --> 19:18.480]  Well don't let nothing get to you. Only the father can't do it by you. So don't let back
[19:18.480 --> 19:34.480]  my people hurt you until they can get behind you. You know what I mean? My friend, knowledge
[19:34.480 --> 19:37.680]  at your service. Okay, we are back. Randy Keldon, rule of law radio on this Friday, the 14th
[19:37.680 --> 19:50.800]  day of September 2018 and we're talking to Tim in Texas about how to put together a bond
[19:50.800 --> 19:56.840]  and I have never done that. I've done bail bonds a lot, but I haven't put up a civil
[19:56.840 --> 20:03.360]  bond and it should be just being able to show, you know, if you go to a bank and show that
[20:03.360 --> 20:11.440]  you are, that your net worth is in excess of this $80,000, it should be relatively easy
[20:11.440 --> 20:18.320]  to get them to issue you a bond based on your collateral.
[20:18.320 --> 20:31.120]  Yeah, that's what we're going to try to do. So anyway, you were talking about something
[20:31.120 --> 20:40.640]  when you went off the air, talking about how we set up the motion for a new trial.
[20:40.640 --> 20:48.960]  Yes. I want to do a motion for a new trial. Actually, when I write an original pleading,
[20:48.960 --> 20:56.840]  I'm always thinking about the appeal because we got this rule that says you'll never win
[20:56.840 --> 21:03.920]  your case in the trial court. Always expect the judge to rule against you out of hand
[21:03.920 --> 21:11.840]  at every turn and we've pretty well got to fulfill our expectations. You expect to win
[21:11.840 --> 21:16.920]  your case in the trial court and the whole purpose is setting the record and we have
[21:16.920 --> 21:24.760]  kept the record set and that's part of what's given them a problem because we've got everything
[21:24.760 --> 21:33.240]  in the record and we've got a mandamus win in the court of appeals.
[21:33.240 --> 21:42.240]  So each document, try to design it with the appeal in mind so that now we're going to
[21:42.240 --> 21:48.480]  do a motion for a new trial. So I want to take the documents that have been filed and
[21:48.480 --> 21:57.160]  the opposing counsel have complained that the picklers have been cutting and pasting.
[21:57.160 --> 22:04.200]  Yes, as a matter of fact, we have. That's the way we design the pleadings so that we
[22:04.200 --> 22:08.720]  can each pleading bills on the next so you don't start from scratch for each pleading.
[22:08.720 --> 22:17.840]  Now, these are shyster lawyers, so they practice turning a case. Charge your clients as much
[22:17.840 --> 22:26.640]  as possible. So they make it look like they write every document from scratch. Well, we're
[22:26.640 --> 22:34.960]  not trying to turn a case. What we want is every document to build on the one before
[22:34.960 --> 22:41.880]  it. So as you go through the case, everything builds toward what they read in the appeal.
[22:41.880 --> 22:48.560]  So now file a motion for new trial and in the motion for new trial, you notice the court
[22:48.560 --> 22:56.200]  of where you believe the court was in error. Well, that's exactly what you do in an appeal.
[22:56.200 --> 23:04.520]  So it doesn't have to be as detailed as far as case law as an appeal does, but it looks
[23:04.520 --> 23:11.880]  the same. So this is a precursor to appeal. We do get to do part of it at a time. Appeal
[23:11.880 --> 23:18.520]  is pretty difficult. It's pretty involved. It takes a lot of case law, so it helps that
[23:18.520 --> 23:24.240]  you plan your pleadings so that you build toward the appeal toward the end. So we'll
[23:24.240 --> 23:33.760]  get a motion for new trial filed. If the judge does not rule on the motion for new trial,
[23:33.760 --> 23:41.920]  that will gain 120 days. 120 days, if the judge has not ruled and the motion for new
[23:41.920 --> 23:52.280]  trial is deemed denied as a matter of law. So then the clock restarts for appeal. Then
[23:52.280 --> 24:00.280]  we have 60 days to file an appellate brief, 60 or 90 hours to reject. And then once we
[24:00.280 --> 24:07.720]  file that, then the other side will have, I think, 30 days to file their brief. And
[24:07.720 --> 24:15.400]  then there's an opportunity to file a response to a brief, and we can file a response to
[24:15.400 --> 24:20.920]  their brief, and that's where it stops unless they ask the court for permission. And then
[24:20.920 --> 24:25.920]  it goes to hearing, it'll probably take the court those six to nine months to render
[24:25.920 --> 24:31.880]  a ruling. That's the only way it works. So this stops things for a long time, and that
[24:31.880 --> 24:35.400]  will give us time to file a federal suit against them.
[24:35.400 --> 24:40.200]  Is that because of the backlog of the cases?
[24:40.200 --> 24:45.880]  Yeah, yeah. Your case goes on the bottom. Now we filed a mandamus, and they heard that
[24:45.880 --> 24:52.760]  right away, but that's because it was a mandamus. But a regular appeal, it just goes at the
[24:52.760 --> 24:54.320]  bottom of the stack.
[24:54.320 --> 24:57.040]  Hey, it still took two months.
[24:57.040 --> 25:06.640]  Yeah, so that was passed. So one thing about lawsuits is they take a long time. And once
[25:06.640 --> 25:16.440]  we get past this bond issue right here and into appeal, now it's when we can start working
[25:16.440 --> 25:25.440]  on the RICO suit against them. Then you're the plaintiff, and you're in the federal court
[25:25.440 --> 25:32.720]  not this local state court, and it's a whole different atmosphere there.
[25:32.720 --> 25:40.720]  Well, we've had someone, you know, the city administrator is probably going to get canned.
[25:40.720 --> 25:45.440]  I had a brilliant idea. I called my wife. She was over helping a lady who's been sick.
[25:45.440 --> 25:52.080]  Okay, hold on, hold on. So that everybody understands why that really matters. It is clear that this
[25:52.080 --> 26:00.440]  whole thing came about because the city administrator had a grudge against the PIXAS. And now the
[26:00.440 --> 26:05.120]  one who started all this is getting fired. Okay, go ahead.
[26:05.120 --> 26:11.080]  Well, she's getting fired on her own, doing nothing we had to do with it. She was, in
[26:11.080 --> 26:15.560]  fact, talked to a lady who's been going to council meetings, and she said, you know,
[26:15.560 --> 26:19.240]  you look at the council and they all look like they don't know what they're doing. They're
[26:19.240 --> 26:26.280]  just there burning time to get through it. Okay, tell us what to do. Diane. And so Diane,
[26:26.280 --> 26:30.680]  she has power over these people because she's got everything they need. And if she doesn't
[26:30.680 --> 26:35.280]  have it, she just says, well, I didn't have time to do that. And they just let it go because
[26:35.280 --> 26:41.320]  they don't know how to process. They're there in a town of 1,200 people. And they're not
[26:41.320 --> 26:47.160]  as, you know, these people are living in $400,000 houses and they're on the council because
[26:47.160 --> 26:53.920]  this town is full of a bunch of dumb people. Now, that's my opinion of how they think.
[26:53.920 --> 27:02.600]  But seeing this, now that she's on administrative leave while being investigated for misconduct,
[27:02.600 --> 27:07.560]  I had my wife, I called her. She's helping a lady who's sick. She's at her house. So
[27:07.560 --> 27:15.600]  I said, have her call and ask if they're hiring. And so she did and they said, no, not at this
[27:15.600 --> 27:21.280]  time, but you can come in and fill out an application. And so the nurse was there also
[27:21.280 --> 27:26.120]  and she called in and said, could I please speak to the city administrator? She said,
[27:26.120 --> 27:34.120]  well, she's out till the end of the month. Now, I'm hoping that that means they're just,
[27:34.120 --> 27:38.160]  you know, saying that to cover themselves so they don't say anything to get themselves
[27:38.160 --> 27:46.400]  in trouble because someone else called the lady who's running for council and told,
[27:46.400 --> 27:52.800]  asked her, hey, I heard that Diane got fired. And she said, oh, I didn't hear that. Where
[27:52.800 --> 27:56.360]  did you hear that from? And he kind of backed up a little bit and said, oh, well, she's
[27:56.360 --> 28:03.720]  on administrative leave. And apparently this guy's friends with the mayor. You understand
[28:03.720 --> 28:12.400]  what I'm saying. I say friends, and I use that word lightly. But the point is, is that
[28:12.400 --> 28:17.440]  it's all speculation now. We don't know if she's going to be canned or not. But if we
[28:17.440 --> 28:23.520]  can get all of our information to the council, there's a chance this is what we're hoping.
[28:23.520 --> 28:28.400]  This lady also wrote the mayor a letter telling this is how you can make things right with
[28:28.400 --> 28:35.440]  the citizens of Newark. You can take care of the drainage issues. You can take care of
[28:35.440 --> 28:42.880]  the issue with the Pixlers. And then she also sent in the letter, the original email that
[28:42.880 --> 28:54.080]  I wrote to the code for government officer. Uh-oh, something happened. Are you there?
[28:54.080 --> 29:08.160]  Yeah, I'm here. Okay, it's okay. You were breaking up a little bit. Okay, okay. Well,
[29:08.160 --> 29:17.920]  anyway, it's okay. You're breaking up pretty bad. We're about to go to break. So why don't
[29:17.920 --> 29:23.640]  you hang up and call back in on the break? Maybe we'll get a better connection. Okay.
[29:23.640 --> 29:34.360]  Okay. Okay. This is Randy Kelton, real law radio. And our calling number is 512-646-1984.
[29:34.360 --> 29:40.320]  We have some room on the call board and we got another hour and a half, hour and a half
[29:40.320 --> 29:46.280]  to go. So if you have a question or comment, give us a call. Tina, I see you there. We'll
[29:46.280 --> 29:51.960]  surely get to you when we get done with Tina. So hang on. We'll be right back.
[29:51.960 --> 30:08.680]  This vital mineral fights cancer, fatigue and high blood pressure. Plus, it does wonders
[30:08.680 --> 30:13.440]  for your thyroid, liver and immune system. And Dr. Catherine Albrecht, in a moment, I'll
[30:13.440 --> 30:19.520]  let you know what this important, healthy nutrient is. Privacy is under attack. When
[30:19.520 --> 30:24.080]  you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is
[30:24.080 --> 30:29.680]  gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say
[30:29.680 --> 30:35.880]  no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:35.880 --> 30:41.480]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:41.480 --> 30:46.680]  Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.680 --> 30:50.880]  When you think of nutritional deficiencies, you probably think of third-world countries,
[30:50.880 --> 30:55.760]  or maybe you think of iron, folic acid or vitamin C. But nutritionists say many of us
[30:55.760 --> 31:02.040]  don't get enough iodine, a trace mineral that's essential for thyroid and immune function.
[31:02.040 --> 31:07.600]  Iodine is found in seafood, egg yolks, meat and milk, and it's added to iodized salt.
[31:07.600 --> 31:12.280]  Vegetarians can get it through seaweed. But because the body does not make iodine, experts
[31:12.280 --> 31:17.600]  say up to three-quarters of us may be deficient, and that can lead to weight gain, depression
[31:17.600 --> 31:22.680]  and even cancer. So put the eye back into iodine and check with your doctor to make
[31:22.680 --> 31:27.120]  sure you're getting enough. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com,
[31:27.120 --> 31:33.280]  the world's most private search engine. Did you know there are three million edible
[31:33.280 --> 31:38.840]  food plants on earth and none have the nutritional value of a hemp plant? Hempusa.org offers
[31:38.840 --> 31:45.000]  you hemp protein powder. It does not contain chemicals or THC. It's non-GMO and is 100%
[31:45.000 --> 31:50.640]  gluten-free. Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds
[31:50.640 --> 31:57.480]  the body the nutrients it be. Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can
[31:57.480 --> 32:01.160]  do for you, only at M-U-S-A.org.
[32:01.160 --> 32:07.160]  Rulavall Radio is proud to offer the Rulavall Traffic Seminar. In today's America, we live
[32:07.160 --> 32:10.680]  in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.680 --> 32:14.520]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the
[32:14.520 --> 32:18.000]  right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:22.040]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least
[32:22.040 --> 32:26.240]  expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.240 --> 32:30.080]  Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rulavall Radio, has put together the
[32:30.080 --> 32:33.840]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.840 --> 32:37.840]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable
[32:37.840 --> 32:42.200]  material by going to RulavallRadio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now,
[32:42.200 --> 32:45.720]  you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the
[32:45.720 --> 32:49.920]  Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and
[32:49.920 --> 32:53.200]  other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of
[32:53.200 --> 32:57.520]  this material from RulavallRadio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have
[32:57.520 --> 33:04.520]  a free society we all want and deserve.
[33:27.520 --> 33:45.520]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelkin, Rulavall Radio, and we're talking to Tim in Texas. Okay,
[33:45.520 --> 33:53.520]  Tim, let's see if we've got a better connection.
[33:53.520 --> 34:01.440]  Okay, it sounds good to me. Much better. Okay. Well, the only point I was trying to bring
[34:01.440 --> 34:09.400]  up is if there's some way that we can convince the council that all this did come about, because
[34:09.400 --> 34:15.920]  like I was saying, the letter, the initial letter that I sent to them, which was the
[34:15.920 --> 34:23.520]  guide that she cussed me out, turned me into the sheriff's department, code enforcement
[34:23.520 --> 34:29.080]  officer was witness to it all, and then she retaliated by bringing her husband back down
[34:29.080 --> 34:36.680]  so he could see what I look like. So, it was obvious she wasn't afraid of me because she
[34:36.680 --> 34:44.960]  had claimed threats. And then my letter says, hey, I want to know how I can abate this problem.
[34:44.960 --> 34:49.840]  So before I ever even contacted you, it was evident, you know, talk about setting the
[34:49.840 --> 34:55.840]  record straight. The record was set that I wanted to talk to them, and it appeared that
[34:55.840 --> 35:01.800]  they didn't want to talk to me, and they were just taking her side to everything. And it
[35:01.800 --> 35:07.640]  was CC to the mayor and the mayor pro temp, and neither one of them contacted me back.
[35:07.640 --> 35:12.320]  So I was left to, the only thing that I could do was ask for a hearing. Now, there may have
[35:12.320 --> 35:17.920]  been, you could probably guide me down that road, but I wouldn't have known what else
[35:17.920 --> 35:23.080]  to do except what the options they give me. Does that make sense?
[35:23.080 --> 35:33.800]  Yes. But we're at a point now to where I think the city is beyond the point to where
[35:33.800 --> 35:42.720]  they can make a deal to get out of this. They've done everything they can do. They have done
[35:42.720 --> 35:49.240]  every malicious, low down, rotten thing they could do, and now they're at the end of what
[35:49.240 --> 35:50.240]  they can do.
[35:50.240 --> 35:53.280]  Well, they can blame their attorney.
[35:53.280 --> 35:55.720]  Pardon me?
[35:55.720 --> 35:57.520]  They can blame their attorneys.
[35:57.520 --> 36:02.120]  Let them. Their attorneys acting their name.
[36:02.120 --> 36:11.120]  Too bad. Now we're at the court of appeals. Now we're getting out of the local court that's
[36:11.120 --> 36:16.600]  ruling in their favor at every turn. We're getting to the court of appeals, and from
[36:16.600 --> 36:23.840]  there we'll go to the Supreme Court if necessary, but I don't think it's going to be necessary.
[36:23.840 --> 36:29.600]  We filed a real amount of damage, and when we were doing that, everybody's telling us
[36:29.600 --> 36:36.400]  that you're probably wasting your time because Ritza Mandamus never get ruled. You never
[36:36.400 --> 36:48.120]  get them in your favor. Only 14% are actually accepted, and only 2% of those 14% are ruled
[36:48.120 --> 36:58.000]  in favor of the filer, and we were filing pro se, but they ruled in favor of the filer.
[36:58.000 --> 37:07.600]  This was incredibly unusual, so it indicated that the primary portion of this case, the
[37:07.600 --> 37:15.040]  court was not, the court of appeals was not happy with, and now that we've gotten past
[37:15.040 --> 37:24.040]  the local judge and getting to the court of appeals that issued that mandamus, you can
[37:24.040 --> 37:31.720]  pretty well bet they're going to rule in favor of reversing the dismissal with prejudice.
[37:31.720 --> 37:41.040]  When that happens, we go right back to the civil claim against the city. Now we're still
[37:41.040 --> 37:46.720]  likely to be stuck with this same judge, but we'll be stacking criminal charges against
[37:46.720 --> 37:53.920]  him, and this is what I wanted to speak to now. As soon as this, as the pixels have been
[37:53.920 --> 37:59.480]  struggling to keep up with all the stuff the city's been doing, well, the city's about
[37:59.480 --> 38:08.400]  out of things they can do. Now we start peppering them with bar grievances. Tim has made out
[38:08.400 --> 38:16.400]  a complete timeline, and I went down that timeline and marked out every spot where we
[38:16.400 --> 38:22.760]  could find filed bar grievances, criminal complaints, judicial conduct complaints. Now
[38:22.760 --> 38:28.480]  we start peppering them. Every two or three days they get another one. Now they start
[38:28.480 --> 38:38.120]  feeling the heat. It's our turn, or the pixel's turn, to start turning things back on them.
[38:38.120 --> 38:44.560]  And I am sure when you start filing a bar grievance every other day against these guys,
[38:44.560 --> 38:50.760]  that they're going to scream to high heaven, and they're going to probably move the court
[38:50.760 --> 39:00.680]  to try to ease you in order to prevent you from filing anymore. The court has no power,
[39:00.680 --> 39:09.040]  so there's nothing they can do about it. So you'll get some of your payback. Regardless
[39:09.040 --> 39:16.840]  of what the court does, we can give these lawyers a trip through the legal system they're
[39:16.840 --> 39:21.840]  not going to believe, and they will have earned it.
[39:21.840 --> 39:22.840]  Yes.
[39:22.840 --> 39:32.240]  Okay, Ken. You talked to Ken today. He's on my mind, and I'm trying to pry him out of
[39:32.240 --> 39:38.160]  there. That's Ken Magnuson. He's on the show on occasion. Okay. Do you have anything else
[39:38.160 --> 39:39.160]  for us, Tim?
[39:39.160 --> 39:44.040]  No. That's probably as deep as I can get.
[39:44.040 --> 39:52.400]  Okay. Well, thank you. Now we're going to go to Tina in California. Hello, Tina.
[39:52.400 --> 39:56.160]  Hi, Randy. How are you?
[39:56.160 --> 39:59.400]  I'm doing good. What do you have for us today?
[39:59.400 --> 40:11.200]  I have a question, as usual, for your very knowledgeable self. I heard you earlier talking
[40:11.200 --> 40:19.520]  about how to go after these people with bar grievances, judicial complaints, which I'm
[40:19.520 --> 40:25.920]  getting very familiar with, and we'll be getting even more familiar with as I file more and
[40:25.920 --> 40:38.200]  more. But if a person for, in this case, a bank files a declaration, in this case it's
[40:38.200 --> 40:48.920]  a real property declaration, and it's signed under penalty of perjury. Okay? But they are
[40:48.920 --> 40:57.720]  called class themselves as, I am an assistant secretary employed by one West Bank. And she
[40:57.720 --> 41:06.280]  has clearly perjured herself because she says she is the custodian of records. She has personal
[41:06.280 --> 41:17.760]  knowledge, et cetera, et cetera, and it claims here the type of property hit other single
[41:17.760 --> 41:25.480]  family residents. No. It was the principal resident and also a multi-unit residential.
[41:25.480 --> 41:28.880]  She said it's an other single family resident.
[41:28.880 --> 41:35.160]  Okay, it is. How many residences were in the building?
[41:35.160 --> 41:43.760]  Three. Then it is another single family residence. You can have up to four.
[41:43.760 --> 42:04.160]  Okay. Then the second thing she says is that the total claim as of 514, 2014, it's $495,165.86.
[42:04.160 --> 42:15.160]  Well, if that is true, how could the attorney claim four months earlier in the proof of
[42:15.160 --> 42:25.480]  claim that the total amount due was 507,000 and changed, and how could they claim in the
[42:25.480 --> 42:36.800]  notice of trustee sale publicly recorded that it was $365,740.43. They can't all be
[42:36.800 --> 42:37.800]  correct.
[42:37.800 --> 42:49.200]  And their problem is you don't have to prove, well, if it was one party making two state
[42:49.200 --> 42:55.880]  two contradictory statements, you would not have to prove which one was perjury. But clearly
[42:55.880 --> 43:03.080]  one of these statements or two of these statements have to be perjury.
[43:03.080 --> 43:11.600]  Wait a minute. Wait a minute. The last statement was the $300,000. That's the one at the sale?
[43:11.600 --> 43:20.640]  The first one was the notice of trustee sale, $365,000. The second one was the proof of
[43:20.640 --> 43:33.720]  claim in the bankruptcy, which was 507,000. The third one was the listed in the real property
[43:33.720 --> 43:43.360]  declaration in the... I think it was called a notice of... I forget what it was called,
[43:43.360 --> 43:50.280]  but it was to do with the bankruptcy. And that was the $495,000. Now, the fifth one
[43:50.280 --> 43:58.640]  was in the another bankruptcy and another person's bankruptcy that they claimed I transferred
[43:58.640 --> 43:59.640]  the property to.
[43:59.640 --> 44:04.840]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[44:04.840 --> 44:09.240]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:09.240 --> 44:13.120]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality
[44:13.120 --> 44:17.880]  coins and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions
[44:17.880 --> 44:22.560]  for investors. We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited
[44:22.560 --> 44:26.760]  metal dealers and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find
[44:26.760 --> 44:27.760]  it.
[44:27.760 --> 44:30.800]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, we carry popular young Jebony products, such as Beyond Tangy
[44:30.800 --> 44:36.280]  Tangerine and Pollen Burst. We also offer one-world-way, Mountain House storeable foods, Berky Water
[44:36.280 --> 44:41.320]  products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. We broker metals IRA accounts, and
[44:41.320 --> 44:48.680]  we also accept big coins as payment. Call us at 512-646-640. We're located at 7304 Burnett
[44:48.680 --> 44:52.560]  Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday
[44:52.560 --> 45:01.360]  10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[45:01.360 --> 45:06.680]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris
[45:06.680 --> 45:13.320]  Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how, in 24
[45:13.320 --> 45:19.560]  hours, you step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If
[45:19.560 --> 45:24.560]  you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our
[45:24.560 --> 45:30.560]  step-by-step course, and now you can, too. Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed
[45:30.560 --> 45:37.240]  attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn
[45:37.240 --> 45:42.120]  what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our
[45:42.120 --> 45:48.440]  American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[45:48.440 --> 45:55.720]  for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click
[45:55.720 --> 46:25.000]  on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:25.000 --> 46:42.720]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Tina in California.
[46:42.720 --> 46:48.600]  Okay, Tina, we're going to run off the cliff there again. I wasn't paying attention, and
[46:48.600 --> 46:59.960]  I'm going to get in trouble for that. Okay, you were going to the fifth amount claimed.
[46:59.960 --> 47:09.120]  Yeah, you have an amount in February that's claimed, no, in November of 2014 that's claimed
[47:09.120 --> 47:19.000]  as $365. Then you have an amount in January that's claimed as $507. Then in May it's $495.
[47:19.000 --> 47:30.840]  Then in August it's $501. Then in December it's $508. I mean, they cannot possibly, under
[47:30.840 --> 47:38.240]  any circumstance, all be true and correct. So, any one of these are signed under penalty
[47:38.240 --> 47:45.680]  of perjury. Okay, $507, $495, and $508, those are close
[47:45.680 --> 47:52.560]  enough that there's not enough error in there to raise it.
[47:52.560 --> 48:00.240]  How does it go down? It's a substantial issue, but in May they
[48:00.240 --> 48:10.440]  claim $365. In November they claim $365. In February, three months later, they claim
[48:10.440 --> 48:18.640]  $507. Four months after that, they claim it's $495.
[48:18.640 --> 48:28.160]  Okay, the $495 and then the $508, those, that's enough variance that we probably won't get
[48:28.160 --> 48:39.040]  a good claim, but $365 to $507, that's a tremendous difference.
[48:39.040 --> 48:51.720]  So, I think stay close to the $507 church. So, good place to go is claim that the $507
[48:51.720 --> 48:58.560]  is aggravated perjury, because it's inconsistent with the amount claimed at the foreclosure
[48:58.560 --> 49:13.200]  set, the notice of acceleration, that it would have had to have increased $640,000 in, what,
[49:13.200 --> 49:22.000]  three months? In three months. Then, whoever filed the $507, that's the
[49:22.000 --> 49:28.400]  one to go after. Okay, so there's aggravated perjury you say?
[49:28.400 --> 49:35.160]  Aggravated perjury, and you can also claim a tort, an intentional tort, that because
[49:35.160 --> 49:40.080]  they claim this amount, it's impossible for you to pay off the property, so they damaged
[49:40.080 --> 49:45.840]  you and you would have been able to pay off the property if they hadn't increased it to
[49:45.840 --> 49:52.680]  such a dramatic amount. The lender had offered to pay off the property
[49:52.680 --> 49:58.480]  at the amount that was on the notice of trustee sale and they refused it.
[49:58.480 --> 50:09.040]  Okay, you have a good claim. And claim the $507 was, whoever made the claim for the $507,
[50:09.040 --> 50:22.160]  you can sue them personally for the deal of trying to think of the exact word. There's
[50:22.160 --> 50:31.680]  an exact cause of action for causing you to lose a deal. And I'll think of the term in
[50:31.680 --> 50:43.760]  a second, but that's what you can sue them for based on the false claim of an excessive
[50:43.760 --> 50:50.680]  amount. We have a false claim if one party claims
[50:50.680 --> 50:59.920]  in January, in February, that $507 is the exact amount due. And informants later with
[50:59.920 --> 51:08.520]  no payments being made, another party claims only $495 is due. That's a significant difference
[51:08.520 --> 51:19.600]  for someone to pay. It's like, okay, which one is true? $365, $507, $495, $501. And then
[51:19.600 --> 51:30.120]  11 months after they claim $507 is due, they claim $508 is due. How does it only go up
[51:30.120 --> 51:38.960]  $1,000 if they claim, I haven't paid in 12 months? And the actual, suppose there's
[51:38.960 --> 51:45.040]  another issue. How did they come up with any amount? Did
[51:45.040 --> 51:49.800]  they produce? No, they refused to produce an accounting.
[51:49.800 --> 51:54.800]  And the court apparently allowed them to do that?
[51:54.800 --> 52:01.160]  They allowed them to do that. They say that I have to just pay whatever they say is owed
[52:01.160 --> 52:05.960]  and that I'm not allowed an accounting. Now, if people are finding these under penalty
[52:05.960 --> 52:13.400]  of poetry, but they're not attorneys, they are a mere employee of this bank. What do
[52:13.400 --> 52:17.280]  you got? You can't file a bar grievance because they're not an attorney.
[52:17.280 --> 52:25.040]  But you can file criminal affidavits. Okay, that's what I was, I can file a criminal
[52:25.040 --> 52:32.160]  affidavit against these people who claim that they have knowledge under penalty of poetry
[52:32.160 --> 52:36.800]  and that they have personal knowledge of the exact amount.
[52:36.800 --> 52:45.680]  You can claim if there has to be more than one party involved in this. You have the person
[52:45.680 --> 52:56.320]  whose name is on the affidavit and then you have the attorneys who represented the bank.
[52:56.320 --> 53:04.720]  It's obvious on its face that there's a serious discrepancy between these two different numbers,
[53:04.720 --> 53:16.120]  the 365 and the 507, that cannot be lost on the lawyers. So see the lawyers and the person
[53:16.120 --> 53:26.480]  filing the affidavit, charge the lawyers with criminal conspiracy to commit or in the alternative,
[53:26.480 --> 53:35.760]  misprison a felony. If they can show that they didn't conspire with this person to file
[53:35.760 --> 53:50.000]  this false claim, then it's clear on its face that they acted to support this claim. That
[53:50.000 --> 54:01.960]  would be misprison a felony. And then those acts caused a tort against, created a tort
[54:01.960 --> 54:09.960]  against you based on fraud. And you can sue them for fraud and under fraud you sue them
[54:09.960 --> 54:16.520]  for travel damages. So three times, oh, the term I was trying to think of earlier, benefit
[54:16.520 --> 54:26.600]  of the bargain. Benefit of the bargain, okay. You could have paid off the property at $365,000.
[54:26.600 --> 54:34.280]  You made an offer under the UCC to pay the house. They refused the offer. In your suit
[54:34.280 --> 54:48.560]  was there a UCC claim of tender? I had a claim of tender and in multiple instances the buyer
[54:48.560 --> 54:55.400]  of the property, which was a joint LLC, claimed that I could not possibly have tended because
[54:55.400 --> 54:59.840]  I had previously filed for bankruptcy. Well, it's not your position to say that because
[54:59.840 --> 55:05.720]  you can't tell me if a lender, a private lender, has offered to pay, which they had.
[55:05.720 --> 55:12.440]  There was proof of an offer. There was proof of funds. There was an earnest money check.
[55:12.440 --> 55:18.400]  There was a letter from a private Wells Fargo banker saying this person had the funds to
[55:18.400 --> 55:28.200]  pay this amount. They refused it. And so an attorney said, I did not offer proper tender
[55:28.200 --> 55:34.840]  and could not because I had filed a bankruptcy. No, that's not true because you can't tell
[55:34.840 --> 55:41.400]  me that Randy Kelton decided he liked this deal. And even though I'd filed bankruptcy,
[55:41.400 --> 55:49.680]  he wanted to buy this property and make a deal with me to renegotiate at a fixed rate
[55:49.680 --> 55:55.320]  interest, which is what had happened with this private lender. They said, I want security
[55:55.320 --> 56:00.360]  in this property. I'm going to buy the property. I will refinance the deal at a fixed rate
[56:00.360 --> 56:09.560]  for 30 years. And I accepted that deal. But the bank refused to accept the offer based
[56:09.560 --> 56:16.480]  on their own figures in the publicly recorded notice of trustee sale of which they sent
[56:16.480 --> 56:25.800]  me 97 copies in one day and billed me for it. Who have those 97 copies?
[56:25.800 --> 56:35.920]  Okay. That's the... Was the billing for the 97 copies an issue in the lawsuit?
[56:35.920 --> 56:46.480]  We brought that up, $2,010 for sending certified mailing costs.
[56:46.480 --> 56:54.720]  Okay. If they're already in the lawsuit, they've become resjudicata. So we have to find another
[56:54.720 --> 57:01.040]  way to go after them. And the way to go after them is suing the actors, primarily the employee
[57:01.040 --> 57:12.360]  personally, and the lawyers for conspiracy to commit aggravated perjury and costing you
[57:12.360 --> 57:19.320]  the benefit of the bargain when you had a proof of ability to tender.
[57:19.320 --> 57:21.640]  Yes.
[57:21.640 --> 57:25.400]  So but first go after them criminally.
[57:25.400 --> 57:34.400]  Well, I'm looking on that, but I wondered how to go after each party that has perjured
[57:34.400 --> 57:37.480]  themselves in court documents.
[57:37.480 --> 57:42.760]  Yeah. You named them personally for committing a tort against you.
[57:42.760 --> 57:43.760]  Okay.
[57:43.760 --> 57:52.200]  That's a tort of fraud, knowing an intentional fraud. And there you get trouble damages. So
[57:52.200 --> 57:57.480]  you sue them for three times the benefit of the bargain, three times the value of the
[57:57.480 --> 57:58.480]  property.
[57:58.480 --> 58:05.120]  Because if you commit perjury, they go after you, but it seems like in four years the bank
[58:05.120 --> 58:13.960]  or an attorney can commit perjury, they can have what some states call litigation privilege,
[58:13.960 --> 58:21.440]  which says an attorney can lie because they have a litigation privilege, which means...
[58:21.440 --> 58:28.600]  Yeah, you can do that, but if he... that's in the civil court, but else if he lies and
[58:28.600 --> 58:37.920]  the liar is about a material fact under oath, that's aggravated perjury. We don't care
[58:37.920 --> 58:42.560]  what civil court does. Hang on, about to go to break. Randy Kelton, Wheel of Law Radio,
[58:42.560 --> 58:50.320]  we'll be right back.
[58:50.320 --> 58:55.360]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America
[58:55.360 --> 59:01.000]  is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:05.360]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.360 --> 59:09.960]  today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.960 --> 59:15.160]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three-volume
[59:15.160 --> 59:20.360]  set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements
[59:20.360 --> 59:26.080]  of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how
[59:26.080 --> 59:32.280]  to build up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements
[59:32.280 --> 59:45.240]  of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.240 --> 59:49.240]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.240 --> 01:00:02.760]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at www.logosradio-network.com.
[01:00:02.760 --> 01:00:08.600]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lowstar Lowdown, provided by Deli Bulletin's
[01:00:08.600 --> 01:00:15.880]  for the Commodities Market, Today's History, News Updates, and the Inside Scoop into the
[01:00:15.880 --> 01:00:26.200]  Tides of the Alternative. Markets for the 11th of April, 2018, closed
[01:00:26.200 --> 01:00:35.400]  with gold $1,353.22 in ounce, silver $16.68 in ounce, Texas crew $65.51 of barrel, bitcoins
[01:00:35.400 --> 01:00:45.080]  at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80, bitcoin cash is at $652.90 and finally light coins
[01:00:45.080 --> 01:00:49.080]  at $114.34, a crypto coin.
[01:00:49.080 --> 01:01:01.400]  Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01:01.400 --> 01:01:06.200]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color,
[01:01:06.200 --> 01:01:11.960]  religion, sex, or national origin. It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration
[01:01:11.960 --> 01:01:16.960]  funds, racial segregation in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for
[01:01:16.960 --> 01:01:24.120]  places of business. Today in History.
[01:01:24.120 --> 01:01:28.280]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack on
[01:01:28.280 --> 01:01:32.440]  civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:01:32.440 --> 01:01:36.880]  is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria Bashar al-Assad by the
[01:01:36.880 --> 01:01:41.640]  United States and on Israel by Russia. Either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:01:41.640 --> 01:01:46.480]  evidence as of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows
[01:01:46.480 --> 01:01:50.560]  to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will
[01:01:50.560 --> 01:01:55.160]  be coming in nice and new and smart. Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners
[01:01:55.160 --> 01:01:59.600]  with a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it. Many in the West, including
[01:01:59.600 --> 01:02:04.680]  President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted
[01:02:04.680 --> 01:02:09.800]  by Assad and his forces. Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since
[01:02:09.800 --> 01:02:14.120]  yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side
[01:02:14.120 --> 01:02:18.800]  of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's
[01:02:18.800 --> 01:02:23.000]  seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:28.240]  anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS
[01:02:28.240 --> 01:02:32.680]  being one of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels. Now
[01:02:32.680 --> 01:02:38.000]  surprised then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakhova posted on Facebook
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:42.360]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[01:02:42.360 --> 01:02:47.280]  has been fighting terrorists. Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[01:02:47.280 --> 01:02:51.000]  strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:03:17.000]  This was quick roadie with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:17.000 --> 01:03:38.880]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with a little radio on this the 14th day of September, 2018,
[01:03:38.880 --> 01:03:50.400]  and we're talking to Tina in California. This is one of the focus changes I've been
[01:03:50.400 --> 01:04:00.800]  trying to make. We tend to think of a civil case as only civil. And judges, judges like
[01:04:00.800 --> 01:04:06.520]  to say that if you don't like my ruling, well, you can always appeal. Well, when I look
[01:04:06.520 --> 01:04:15.320]  at the underlying duty of the judge, the judge has a duty to determine the facts in accordance
[01:04:15.320 --> 01:04:18.760]  with the rules of evidence, then apply the laws that comes to him to the facts in the
[01:04:18.760 --> 01:04:26.840]  case. If he fails to do that, he abuses, it's an abuse of process and he denies you in due
[01:04:26.840 --> 01:04:34.560]  process. That's a crime in every state. It's certainly a crime in California. But the judge
[01:04:34.560 --> 01:04:39.840]  says if you don't like my ruling, well, you can appeal. And I'm saying, yeah, we can appeal.
[01:04:39.840 --> 01:04:44.560]  We can appeal to a grand jury to indict you. And that has nothing to do with the civil
[01:04:44.560 --> 01:04:52.880]  rules. If a lawyer can come in and misrepresent the truth in a civil case and the civil court
[01:04:52.880 --> 01:05:02.680]  don't care, well, criminal court should. And let's see what a grand jury thinks about that.
[01:05:02.680 --> 01:05:07.920]  And if you start pushing for criminal complaints against the lawyers with a grand jury, the
[01:05:07.920 --> 01:05:16.720]  lawyers are going to be thinking, what if they get this in front of a grand jury? And
[01:05:16.720 --> 01:05:23.880]  the grand jury has someone on there who's been screwed over by a lawyer. We could be
[01:05:23.880 --> 01:05:38.560]  toast. So I suggest every time you have reason to believe that one of these lawyers or anyone
[01:05:38.560 --> 01:05:44.160]  involved in one of these cases committed a crime, you should file against them and run
[01:05:44.160 --> 01:05:52.760]  the routine on them. That's going to raise the stakes dramatically. If you have reason
[01:05:52.760 --> 01:06:02.640]  to believe that these lawyers acted in concert and collusion with this person who issued
[01:06:02.640 --> 01:06:10.840]  this affidavit that was fraudulent or perjurious, then you should start out by filing criminally
[01:06:10.840 --> 01:06:19.400]  against all of them. If you get a criminal indictment, then your civil case is almost
[01:06:19.400 --> 01:06:24.240]  dead bang. Does that make sense, Tina?
[01:06:24.240 --> 01:06:31.720]  Well, it makes sense. And you have to, if they're an employee of the law firm, then
[01:06:31.720 --> 01:06:40.120]  you have the doctrine of respondeat superior, which the head of the law firm is responsible
[01:06:40.120 --> 01:06:47.840]  for what their employees do and file. And if the attorney signs off on stuff without
[01:06:47.840 --> 01:06:55.600]  properly reviewing it, then they are liable. And this particular law firm has been court
[01:06:55.600 --> 01:07:02.600]  in court and sanctioned for doing just that, for signing things without properly reviewing
[01:07:02.600 --> 01:07:11.640]  them. And in bankruptcy, they are required to properly review any claim that is put in.
[01:07:11.640 --> 01:07:20.600]  Oh, this is federal bankruptcy. It was in a bankruptcy.
[01:07:20.600 --> 01:07:27.880]  That raises the stakes. It's a little different in the federal when you start going for grand
[01:07:27.880 --> 01:07:33.040]  juries. This is likely to terrify these guys.
[01:07:33.040 --> 01:07:39.240]  So I file in federal for a grand jury on these people who submitted for juries?
[01:07:39.240 --> 01:07:47.560]  Yes. If this is in a federal court, then you can go straight to the federal grand jury.
[01:07:47.560 --> 01:07:52.560]  If it was in a state court, it would be a state crime.
[01:07:52.560 --> 01:08:00.240]  So this was in a bankruptcy court that this particular declaration was filed under penalty
[01:08:00.240 --> 01:08:02.240]  of budget?
[01:08:02.240 --> 01:08:11.320]  Taxi courts, a whole other animal. That's federal. Now you get to mess with the tenure
[01:08:11.320 --> 01:08:25.440]  or the professional careers of FBI agents, U.S. attorneys. And we have some peculiar
[01:08:25.440 --> 01:08:34.240]  influences right now in that when Trump took office, every U.S. attorney in the country
[01:08:34.240 --> 01:08:36.280]  had to tender his resignation.
[01:08:36.280 --> 01:08:37.280]  Really?
[01:08:37.280 --> 01:08:38.280]  Yeah.
[01:08:38.280 --> 01:08:50.640]  Everyone does. That leaves the president with the option of appointing as U.S. attorneys
[01:08:50.640 --> 01:08:59.720]  to anyone he chooses because they're part of the executive. So they work under him.
[01:08:59.720 --> 01:09:05.360]  Now generally, the president doesn't throw them all out. Now George Bush, he threw out
[01:09:05.360 --> 01:09:12.440]  a whole bunch of them. There's a big brouhaha over that. Trump didn't, but he could have.
[01:09:12.440 --> 01:09:23.200]  And he still can because he still holds their resignation. And California is a blue state.
[01:09:23.200 --> 01:09:35.000]  Trump is at least minimally red. So there are tools you can use in the Fed.
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:42.520]  First thing I would do is file a criminal complaint with the SAC, the special agent in
[01:09:42.520 --> 01:09:49.040]  charge of the FBI. The FBI has kind of turned into a secret police. You can't find out
[01:09:49.040 --> 01:09:57.480]  regular agents' names. The only names you can find are the special agents in charge.
[01:09:57.480 --> 01:10:05.720]  So you can find the boss. So we prepare a criminal complaint against these people and
[01:10:05.720 --> 01:10:15.560]  file it with the look of the name of the special agent in charge. He'll be listed on the internet,
[01:10:15.560 --> 01:10:25.160]  on the website of whatever office is local to where this occurred. And then make up a
[01:10:25.160 --> 01:10:32.840]  verified criminal affidavit and send it to that individual. Now you've got him on the
[01:10:32.840 --> 01:10:40.720]  dime. And what he is certainly going to do is cover his behind by having some agents
[01:10:40.720 --> 01:10:44.080]  go out and talk to these lawyers. And these lawyers are going to do a little song and
[01:10:44.080 --> 01:10:51.800]  dance and salsa down your pants. And then when you don't hear back from the FBI agent,
[01:10:51.800 --> 01:10:58.280]  which you almost certainly never, ever will no matter what you file, then you file a complaint
[01:10:58.280 --> 01:11:06.440]  against, well, I'm sorry, first thing that you do is you send a request to the U.S. Attorney
[01:11:06.440 --> 01:11:15.080]  General asking the Attorney General, no, I'm sorry, I'm getting ahead of myself. When
[01:11:15.080 --> 01:11:21.400]  you don't hear back from the FBI agent, then you file a complaint against the FBI agent
[01:11:21.400 --> 01:11:30.400]  with the U.S. Attorney, noticing, accusing the FBI agent of shielding the accused from
[01:11:30.400 --> 01:11:39.840]  prosecution. Now, he may be actively investigating your accusation. You don't know. But he hadn't
[01:11:39.840 --> 01:11:49.000]  talked to you, so you don't know that. If he is actively investigating the accusations,
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:53.080]  and the prosecuting attorney's office calls him and tells him, I got somebody filing criminal
[01:11:53.080 --> 01:11:59.000]  charges against you, accusing you of shielding these people from prosecution, then he'll
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:07.800]  explain that to them. And the prosecutor will explain that to you. If he's not, then you're
[01:12:07.800 --> 01:12:12.920]  not going to hear from the prosecutor. And when you don't hear from the prosecutor, then
[01:12:12.920 --> 01:12:19.080]  you make up a criminal complaint against the prosecutor and send it to the prosecutor's
[01:12:19.080 --> 01:12:25.320]  office addressed to the foreman of the grand jury. Put a little postcard in there and ask
[01:12:25.320 --> 01:12:32.000]  the foreman to send it back to you with his initials on it, telling the foreman the reason
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:37.080]  you want him to initial it and not sign it is that the prosecutor has a rubber stamp
[01:12:37.080 --> 01:12:40.800]  with his name on it, and you want to make sure the prosecutor didn't rubber stamp it.
[01:12:40.800 --> 01:12:46.520]  Well, there's no way the prosecutor's going to give that to the foreman, so you won't
[01:12:46.520 --> 01:12:52.640]  get that back. Then you file criminal charges against the U.S. attorney with the Attorney
[01:12:52.640 --> 01:13:01.440]  General in Washington, D.C. Now, don't expect any of these people to prosecute anybody because
[01:13:01.440 --> 01:13:06.640]  they're all political arms of the president, and they're not going to do anything that
[01:13:06.640 --> 01:13:17.560]  the president doesn't prove of. However, you're creating political cannon fodder, especially
[01:13:17.560 --> 01:13:23.680]  for the local U.S. attorney. When you file criminal charges against the U.S. attorney,
[01:13:23.680 --> 01:13:30.080]  I mean the local U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C., all of a sudden his name pops up on
[01:13:30.080 --> 01:13:42.200]  everybody's radar. Okay. And he knows it. His name pops up in conjunction with criminal
[01:13:42.200 --> 01:13:52.680]  accusations against him for jury tampering. Okay. He can come down there and explain that
[01:13:52.680 --> 01:14:00.960]  all he wants to and is still going to look bad for him. And he's not going to be the
[01:14:00.960 --> 01:14:08.360]  head camper. And then he's going to come back to the SAC and let the SAC know how much he's
[01:14:08.360 --> 01:14:16.760]  not a head camper. Now we may actually get the SAC to get up off the dime. At the end
[01:14:16.760 --> 01:14:22.960]  of the day, it's all politics. Absolutely. Now I have a couple of questions for you.
[01:14:22.960 --> 01:14:30.400]  One, when will you post the replay of this call so I can go through all this and take
[01:14:30.400 --> 01:14:36.800]  it down word for word and follow these instructions? Okay. Deborah should have it up in a day or
[01:14:36.800 --> 01:14:41.600]  two. It generally only takes you a couple of days to get the archives up. Wonderful.
[01:14:41.600 --> 01:14:46.840]  So I'm going to go find that. Secondly, I have a point to make here because you talked
[01:14:46.840 --> 01:14:54.520]  all about the president, the political situation, whose, well, there is a little bit of a twist
[01:14:54.520 --> 01:15:05.760]  here because the bank that is involved in this was headed at the time by the current
[01:15:05.760 --> 01:15:15.440]  Treasury Secretary Stephen Mnuchin, who committed poetry on his confirmation hearing and who
[01:15:15.440 --> 01:15:23.160]  seems to have great deal of protection against all this and can block any of the things I
[01:15:23.160 --> 01:15:30.040]  do because it's against the bank he was running at the time. How do I get that done?
[01:15:30.040 --> 01:15:39.160]  Oh, no, you don't understand. We don't care if anybody gets prosecuted up at those levels.
[01:15:39.160 --> 01:15:45.680]  This is all political. I once got all of the highest judges in Texas put in front of a
[01:15:45.680 --> 01:15:53.480]  grand jury and this took a year of hammering these guys and bushwhacking judges in their
[01:15:53.480 --> 01:15:59.000]  courtroom with criminal complaints and coming down to the grand jury with camera crews and
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:05.240]  just all kinds of histronics. And I thought when I got my complaints in front of the grand
[01:16:05.240 --> 01:16:11.600]  jury against all nine of these highest judges in Texas that it was because of my eloquent
[01:16:11.600 --> 01:16:17.520]  oratory and all of the pressure I had put on them nonsense didn't have anything to do
[01:16:17.520 --> 01:16:22.440]  with any of that. It was all political. We're about to go to break and we'll come back on
[01:16:22.440 --> 01:16:30.640]  the other side. I'll explain why it was political. And that was a incredible learning experience
[01:16:30.640 --> 01:16:36.160]  for me. That's when I came to understand that Ken's four rules were correct and his first
[01:16:36.160 --> 01:16:47.240]  rule is everything is political. You won't scare these people. What scares them is threat
[01:16:47.240 --> 01:16:51.160]  you give to one of their political enemies. We're about to go to break. I'll explain that
[01:16:51.160 --> 01:16:58.600]  in more detail on the other side. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio. I'll call in number 5126461984.
[01:16:58.600 --> 01:17:01.600]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.600 --> 01:17:10.360]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[01:17:10.360 --> 01:17:17.560]  Gunworks. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance
[01:17:17.560 --> 01:17:23.800]  to win. From Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical
[01:17:23.800 --> 01:17:30.800]  AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[01:17:30.800 --> 01:17:36.880]  Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get ten
[01:17:36.880 --> 01:17:43.680]  chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the
[01:17:43.680 --> 01:17:48.480]  shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the
[01:17:48.480 --> 01:17:55.280]  best quality programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.280 --> 01:18:00.520]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.520 --> 01:18:05.160]  I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm
[01:18:05.160 --> 01:18:09.160]  so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be
[01:18:09.160 --> 01:18:14.080]  lost without Logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to
[01:18:14.080 --> 01:18:17.920]  volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money
[01:18:17.920 --> 01:18:22.320]  to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.320 --> 01:18:27.560]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[01:18:27.560 --> 01:18:31.760]  With ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.760 --> 01:18:38.600]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Get on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you
[01:18:38.600 --> 01:18:43.800]  order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.800 --> 01:18:45.300]  Do I pay extra? No.
[01:18:45.300 --> 01:18:47.800]  Do I have to do anything different when I order? No.
[01:18:47.800 --> 01:18:51.280]  Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.280 --> 01:18:57.280]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.280 --> 01:18:58.760]  We are Logos.
[01:18:58.760 --> 01:19:13.560]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:13.560 --> 01:19:41.080]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton of Rue de la Radio and we're talking to Tina in California.
[01:19:41.080 --> 01:19:53.160]  It's a paradigm shift. I'm an engineer and I design and build stuff and I put something
[01:19:53.160 --> 01:20:02.280]  together and I test it and I can look immediately, look at and assess the results because there's
[01:20:02.280 --> 01:20:07.000]  a direct relationship between what I do and the results I get.
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  Well, that's not how it works in politics. Politics is more like flying an airplane.
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:19.520]  You know, if you get in a car and you turn the wheel, the car turns. If you get in an
[01:20:19.520 --> 01:20:29.840]  airplane and you turn the ailerons, the airplane doesn't tip over and turn right away.
[01:20:29.840 --> 01:20:36.960]  You put pressure on the ailerons and the ailerons put pressure on the air and it takes a bit
[01:20:36.960 --> 01:20:45.600]  like in a Cessna 150. If you give it about 10 degrees of ailerons shift, you can count
[01:20:45.600 --> 01:20:52.720]  one, two, three and then the aircraft will start to move. The bigger the airplane, the
[01:20:52.720 --> 01:21:01.320]  longer the delay. Politics is kind of like that. You do something and you don't see an
[01:21:01.320 --> 01:21:08.640]  immediate response. It takes a while. I went after the Court of Criminal Appeals over something
[01:21:08.640 --> 01:21:16.360]  really minor. In Texas, we have two high courts. The Supreme Court is the high court for civil.
[01:21:16.360 --> 01:21:21.120]  The Court of Criminal Appeals is the high court for criminal. Well, I went to file a habeas
[01:21:21.120 --> 01:21:27.400]  corpus and the clerk said I had to file a motion for leave to file. I said, heck with
[01:21:27.400 --> 01:21:36.040]  that, this is a habeas. The great writ, the writ of right, this Court has no power to
[01:21:36.040 --> 01:21:41.400]  grant or deny leave. Well, the clerk said he couldn't accept it without the motion.
[01:21:41.400 --> 01:21:45.040]  So I'm trying to get this kid out of jail, so it really wasn't my fight. So I made up
[01:21:45.040 --> 01:21:51.360]  a motion for leave to file. They denied it. So I make up criminal charges against all
[01:21:51.360 --> 01:21:55.200]  of them, take them to District Attorney. District Attorney refused to give me the grand
[01:21:55.200 --> 01:22:05.200]  jury. It took a year and they finally gave them to the grand jury. And I had given them
[01:22:05.200 --> 01:22:12.680]  a 117-page document, a copy for each grand jury member. And after the grand jury headed
[01:22:12.680 --> 01:22:17.040]  a month and a half, they were only in office for three months, I went to the prosecutor
[01:22:17.040 --> 01:22:21.720]  and I said, what's the problem? You gave this to these guys a month and a half ago. And
[01:22:21.720 --> 01:22:28.800]  we figured they'd give them to them. What I told the prosecutor is, all you have to
[01:22:28.800 --> 01:22:34.440]  do is give it to them. 2.03 code of criminal procedure commands you to give it to them.
[01:22:34.440 --> 01:22:41.320]  So you don't have to agree with it. You can go in there and argue against prison. So I
[01:22:41.320 --> 01:22:46.640]  don't care. All I want to do is get it there. That way, you have to give them to the grand
[01:22:46.640 --> 01:22:51.600]  jury, then you can come in and ride in on your white horse and save all these judges
[01:22:51.600 --> 01:22:59.120]  from indictment. Well, she gave them to them. And after a month and a half, I questioned
[01:22:59.120 --> 01:23:06.720]  Clare Dawson Brown about it. And she said, well, Ms. Kelton, I made sure that every grand
[01:23:06.720 --> 01:23:20.880]  jury member read your entire presentment. Say what? 117 pages? My habeas was in there.
[01:23:20.880 --> 01:23:28.880]  And I thought, what in the world is going on? I've expected her to argue against indictment.
[01:23:28.880 --> 01:23:37.800]  She was doing no such thing. Ron Earl, that no-good rotten scoundrel, 25-year district
[01:23:37.800 --> 01:23:47.360]  attorney. He's the guy that took out Tom DeLay, Speaker of the House of Representatives,
[01:23:47.360 --> 01:23:55.200]  D.C., not state, Federal House of Representatives. Ron Earl, a local district attorney, got him
[01:23:55.200 --> 01:24:00.880]  prosecuted and nobody ever accused Ron Earl of a crime. There's no criminal complaint in
[01:24:00.880 --> 01:24:10.480]  the court record. It was horrendously illegal. This guy was a scoundrel. He's retiring, 25-year
[01:24:10.480 --> 01:24:16.400]  district attorney. He's not running for office again. He's a Democrat. All nine of these
[01:24:16.400 --> 01:24:24.240]  judges are Republicans. So the gun had nothing to do with my complaints, had nothing to do
[01:24:24.240 --> 01:24:31.840]  with all the pressure I put on them. The prosecuting attorney saw what I had and said, I can use
[01:24:31.840 --> 01:24:40.400]  that as political cannon fodder to try to take these guys out with me. Tina, that's what
[01:24:40.400 --> 01:24:49.600]  you create. And the higher up you get in the political arena, the more dangerous your political
[01:24:49.600 --> 01:24:55.280]  cannon fodder becomes, because these guys don't know who's going to pick that up and
[01:24:55.280 --> 01:25:04.840]  run with it. It makes them all vulnerable. They do not like being vulnerable. So if you're
[01:25:04.840 --> 01:25:15.480]  making everybody up the line vulnerable, how are they going to get you to go away?
[01:25:15.480 --> 01:25:16.720]  Settle with me.
[01:25:16.720 --> 01:25:22.560]  Yeah. Go down and prosecute the guys you're after, then you're happy.
[01:25:22.560 --> 01:25:28.560]  Good. I would like that. So I've got one more question for you, because this is Texas.
[01:25:28.560 --> 01:25:35.680]  This is related to your wonderful faith. And by the way, I lived in Amarillo for six months
[01:25:35.680 --> 01:25:44.600]  when I first came to America. And how do you go about doing something about this? I'm going
[01:25:44.600 --> 01:25:50.960]  to read you something that all your people in Texas, especially if they are in some kind
[01:25:50.960 --> 01:25:59.480]  of foreclosure, level up at a Texas task force meeting on judicial foreclosure rule on November
[01:25:59.480 --> 01:26:07.840]  7, 2007. That's found in the Supreme Court of Texas. Attorney Michael Barrett of law firm
[01:26:07.840 --> 01:26:11.160]  Barrett Deaf and Frappier Turner and Engel LLP.
[01:26:11.160 --> 01:26:17.000]  Yeah. I'll call him Barrett Deaf and Frappin and kiss my behind.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:25.600]  I like that. They were the second substitute trustees on my case. But anyway, on pages
[01:26:25.600 --> 01:26:36.440]  29, lines 6 through 22 of the definition taken of Attorney Barrett, he testified that there
[01:26:36.440 --> 01:26:44.320]  really isn't such a document. During the discussion about verification of application
[01:26:44.320 --> 01:26:51.160]  documents, Attorney Barrett continued to state, because the servicer usually acquired their
[01:26:51.160 --> 01:27:00.440]  position in the file through the purchase of MSRs, which is mortgage servicing relief.
[01:27:00.440 --> 01:27:07.400]  I think I can't remember what the R is. But anyway, there is an organized market in MSRs
[01:27:07.400 --> 01:27:14.400]  that really makes up maybe as much as 40 to 50% of any mortgage company's assets. And
[01:27:14.400 --> 01:27:20.880]  they acquired this, the status of being a servicer through the purchase of an MSR. Or
[01:27:20.880 --> 01:27:28.280]  they did it themselves. They created their own loan. So finding a document that says,
[01:27:28.280 --> 01:27:34.360]  I am the owner and holder, and I hereby grant to the servicer the right to foreclose in
[01:27:34.360 --> 01:27:45.680]  my name is an impossibility in 90% of the cases. So what do we do after that? When these
[01:27:45.680 --> 01:27:53.040]  very people are foreclosing on people in the name of a substitute trustee, and they've
[01:27:53.040 --> 01:28:00.480]  already stated there's no such document in a Texas task force meeting in front of the
[01:28:00.480 --> 01:28:08.080]  Supreme Court. That is something I would have to do. I'd have to study that case to
[01:28:08.080 --> 01:28:16.400]  fully understand the context in which that's being stated. Because on the surface it appears
[01:28:16.400 --> 01:28:26.760]  contradictory. They have a patent for producing any foreclosure document that is needed to
[01:28:26.760 --> 01:28:35.520]  make a foreclosure. Yes, I'm aware that this whole foreclosure
[01:28:35.520 --> 01:28:41.960]  thing is just a horrible mess. And it appears as though the courts have been bought and
[01:28:41.960 --> 01:28:50.680]  paid for. The only way I've got any kind of a ruling in my favor in any court was when
[01:28:50.680 --> 01:28:56.200]  I filed criminal charges against federal court judgment bride. I did this with the local
[01:28:56.200 --> 01:29:05.320]  SAC. And that really got the federal judge's attention. But otherwise, they ruled against
[01:29:05.320 --> 01:29:11.720]  you out of hand at every turn. This is what I've always been saying. And it may be far
[01:29:11.720 --> 01:29:16.800]  enough down the road now that we may be able to go back after some of them.
[01:29:16.800 --> 01:29:22.440]  Well, we should if we can come up with the right things. Because if they're admitting
[01:29:22.440 --> 01:29:29.240]  on the record that the documents are not there in 90% of the cases, but therefore closing
[01:29:29.240 --> 01:29:36.360]  anyways, how can that be legal? How can it be right? How can it be local?
[01:29:36.360 --> 01:29:43.040]  That's why I have to look closely at the case and see the context. It's incongruous that
[01:29:43.040 --> 01:29:48.000]  he would testify in a way that would undermine everything he's doing. So I'd have to know
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:53.600]  more about that. Hang on, about to go to break Randy Kelton, the rule of law radio, a call
[01:29:53.600 --> 01:30:00.600]  in number 512-646-1984. John, I'll see you there. We'll get to you. We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.600 --> 01:30:08.920]  Keep your voice down. The government now has Russian technology that matches identities
[01:30:08.920 --> 01:30:14.280]  to voices so it can tell who's doing the talking. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back to tell you
[01:30:14.280 --> 01:30:16.440]  how it works after this.
[01:30:16.440 --> 01:30:21.480]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:30:21.480 --> 01:30:27.280]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.280 --> 01:30:33.520]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:33.520 --> 01:30:38.560]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private
[01:30:38.560 --> 01:30:46.120]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.120 --> 01:30:50.880]  Since 2001, when the Patriot Act opened the doors to electronic surveillance, Big Brother
[01:30:50.880 --> 01:30:56.840]  is gone crazy, vacuuming up all of our data. Now it has a new tactic, courtesy of our former
[01:30:56.840 --> 01:31:02.960]  communist allies, the Russians. It's called voice grid nation, and it analyzes and identifies
[01:31:02.960 --> 01:31:08.400]  voices courtesy of Russia's Speech Technology Center. When authorities intercept a call,
[01:31:08.400 --> 01:31:13.040]  the speaker's voice is compared to millions of others, like a fingerprint. How long does
[01:31:13.040 --> 01:31:18.520]  it take for a match? Three seconds. So watch what you say on the phone, comrades. Whether
[01:31:18.520 --> 01:31:22.040]  you say your name or not, Big Brother may know who's talking.
[01:31:22.040 --> 01:31:31.520]  I'm Dr. Kauffman Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.520 --> 01:31:36.920]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The
[01:31:36.920 --> 01:31:41.600]  government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have
[01:31:41.600 --> 01:31:45.880]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have
[01:31:45.880 --> 01:31:50.440]  given their lives, and thousands of my fellow first responders have died. I'm not a conspiracy
[01:31:50.440 --> 01:31:53.640]  theorist, I'm a structural engineer, I'm a New York City correctionalist, I'm an Air
[01:31:53.640 --> 01:31:58.520]  Force pilot, I'm the father who lost his son, we're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.520 --> 01:32:03.360]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home
[01:32:03.360 --> 01:32:07.080]  Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come
[01:32:07.080 --> 01:32:10.720]  on, we all know the government caused it with their chem trails, but good luck getting
[01:32:10.720 --> 01:32:14.600]  them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chem trails, but I'm serious about
[01:32:14.600 --> 01:32:18.480]  your roof. That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle
[01:32:18.480 --> 01:32:23.920]  the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year
[01:32:23.920 --> 01:32:28.520]  A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country
[01:32:28.520 --> 01:32:33.160]  Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call
[01:32:33.160 --> 01:32:41.600]  512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and
[01:32:41.600 --> 01:32:46.200]  we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.200 --> 01:32:55.240]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745
[01:32:55.240 --> 01:33:00.200]  or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I actually
[01:33:00.200 --> 01:33:07.200]  might be kidding about chem trails.
[01:33:30.200 --> 01:33:39.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rural Law Radio, and we're talking to Tina in California.
[01:33:39.040 --> 01:33:47.040]  And this has always been a problem for me with foreclosures. It never seemed to make
[01:33:47.040 --> 01:33:56.440]  any difference how much fact and law we had on our side. It just did not matter. I got
[01:33:56.440 --> 01:34:05.120]  to the point that I told people if we file a foreclosure suit, a wrong foreclosure suit,
[01:34:05.120 --> 01:34:10.440]  you can expect the courts to rule against us out of hand at every turn. At the end of
[01:34:10.440 --> 01:34:20.840]  the day, you're going to lose. So the strategy is you take half of what you would pay a month
[01:34:20.840 --> 01:34:31.040]  in a payment and put it in a fund. And then we hold the banks off for five to seven years.
[01:34:31.040 --> 01:34:37.280]  And then with our suit. And then we come to the second suit. And when they lose the first
[01:34:37.280 --> 01:34:43.400]  suit, we file a second one and then go to the banks and offer to make them a deal. It's
[01:34:43.400 --> 01:34:47.760]  the only way you can beat them. We couldn't beat them straight up because it certainly
[01:34:47.760 --> 01:34:53.280]  appears that our judges are bought and paid for.
[01:34:53.280 --> 01:35:00.400]  Absolutely. But I've already lost mine, so I have to go back to try to get the compensation.
[01:35:00.400 --> 01:35:07.000]  So my compensation will be to go after these people and get them this bought, their insurance
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:13.040]  cancelled, whatever it is. So if you give me, I will send you this information on this
[01:35:13.040 --> 01:35:21.440]  patent and this Texas attorney form. If you give me the bullet points on how to go after
[01:35:21.440 --> 01:35:30.640]  them for what they've done, I will do it. And, you know, if we get some results, great.
[01:35:30.640 --> 01:35:37.760]  I may not get my house. I will not get my house back. I may or may not get compensation,
[01:35:37.760 --> 01:35:44.440]  but I will ensure that all these attorneys who have defrauded me and all their employees
[01:35:44.440 --> 01:35:47.840]  will get some just reports.
[01:35:47.840 --> 01:35:59.360]  Good. You're the kind of people that I look for. I would like to talk to you off the air
[01:35:59.360 --> 01:36:09.360]  about the issue. You seem to be very knowledgeable about the foreclosure mess. And I need a couple
[01:36:09.360 --> 01:36:15.360]  of people who are very knowledgeable. I was very knowledgeable. I got into other things
[01:36:15.360 --> 01:36:23.280]  so I don't do as much of that anymore, but we're building this electronic lawyer program.
[01:36:23.280 --> 01:36:32.880]  I need one to help me with foreclosure. I have a very large site on foreclosure. I have
[01:36:32.880 --> 01:36:42.880]  free mortgage help.com, I believe. And I have a massive amount of information on there.
[01:36:42.880 --> 01:36:49.680]  And one of my things I'll be working towards is turning that into a set of questionnaires
[01:36:49.680 --> 01:36:56.120]  that a person can go onto the site, answer the questionnaire, and it will isolate all
[01:36:56.120 --> 01:37:05.360]  of the issues and remedies that are available. There are a lot of things that most people
[01:37:05.360 --> 01:37:17.720]  never do like requesting the log from the notary for each document that's notarized
[01:37:17.720 --> 01:37:23.480]  in the record. Oh, I've requested that and I've been refused it by the attorneys. The
[01:37:23.480 --> 01:37:32.440]  attorneys in California told two Texas notaries that they were not going to send me their notary
[01:37:32.440 --> 01:37:43.640]  logs. Oh, that's wonderful. You all believe what we can do to a notary in Texas. You can
[01:37:43.640 --> 01:37:56.800]  do that. Never them. These are the tools. We can build a set of tools where it asks
[01:37:56.800 --> 01:38:01.040]  the question, did they do this? Did they do this? If they did this, they start spitting
[01:38:01.040 --> 01:38:08.840]  out documents, criminal complaints, bar grievances, malpractice suits. The user doesn't have to
[01:38:08.840 --> 01:38:16.360]  know anything about it. The system will produce them and all they have to do is sign and send.
[01:38:16.360 --> 01:38:21.120]  I want to go after the notaries in Texas. I want to go after the higher-ups in Texas
[01:38:21.120 --> 01:38:27.760]  who did nothing about my complaints. I want to go after the attorneys that coerced these
[01:38:27.760 --> 01:38:33.360]  two public officials to break the law. Wonderful. Okay.
[01:38:33.360 --> 01:38:43.160]  I have a couple of emails from you. I will send you my phone number.
[01:38:43.160 --> 01:38:49.280]  Please tell me the best time to call you and I will make it happen.
[01:38:49.280 --> 01:38:53.280]  Early in the day is always better than late in the day.
[01:38:53.280 --> 01:38:58.480]  Early in the day is good for me anytime after 7 a.m. Pacific's time.
[01:38:58.480 --> 01:39:04.200]  Good. Just don't call me before 3 in the morning central.
[01:39:04.200 --> 01:39:09.120]  I promise I won't.
[01:39:09.120 --> 01:39:16.960]  I'm Julie up early. I do my best work early in the morning. I will send you my phone number
[01:39:16.960 --> 01:39:20.400]  and give me a call tomorrow and let's talk.
[01:39:20.400 --> 01:39:27.280]  Okay. Sounds good. We're going to get them together as a team.
[01:39:27.280 --> 01:39:32.800]  We each achieve more. Okay. Thank you and we'll talk tomorrow.
[01:39:32.800 --> 01:39:37.360]  Now I'm going to go to John in New York. Hello, John.
[01:39:37.360 --> 01:39:41.880]  Hello, Hi, Randy. Thank you for taking my call.
[01:39:41.880 --> 01:39:48.040]  I got something in the mail today that was very disconcerting and here it is.
[01:39:48.040 --> 01:39:55.600]  It was from the New York State Taxation and Finance Department and here's what they said.
[01:39:55.600 --> 01:40:01.920]  There's a cover letter. It says regarding debt validation, collection case, ID, et cetera.
[01:40:01.920 --> 01:40:07.200]  Here, sir or madam, this is a debt validation that was requested for the following assessment
[01:40:07.200 --> 01:40:14.240]  and it lists the two numbers of my two cases, one in 2007 and one in a small one in 2008.
[01:40:14.240 --> 01:40:19.480]  For a detailed explanation of any assessment ID, please call the collection vendor's support
[01:40:19.480 --> 01:40:28.480]  unit and close, please find a copy of warrants, copy of warrants and a consolidated statement
[01:40:28.480 --> 01:40:37.320]  of tax liability. Well, all they really did was do what they did before and list two numbers.
[01:40:37.320 --> 01:40:45.040]  How much I owed in 2007 and how much I owed in 2008, you know, that's all it was.
[01:40:45.040 --> 01:40:52.480]  The next page, it says, consolidated statement of tax liability and it shows tax type of
[01:40:52.480 --> 01:41:01.440]  income assessment, tax period covering December 31st of 2007, tax amount assessed $990, internet
[01:41:01.440 --> 01:41:13.520]  interest amount assessed $1198 and so on and it goes to a total of $2654, $2654.
[01:41:13.520 --> 01:41:19.640]  And the next page, and they've sent me that twice. To me, that is not a debt validation
[01:41:19.640 --> 01:41:25.600]  level. But anyway, I could be wrong. I'm not a lawyer. I do medical, not legal. That's
[01:41:25.600 --> 01:41:31.960]  why I'm on the phone with you. Then the people of the state of New York and they list the
[01:41:31.960 --> 01:41:39.680]  name as an assessment type period ending December 31st, 2008 and there's an additional $275.
[01:41:39.680 --> 01:41:46.400]  That was very small for 2008. Then it says there's a piece of paper that, and that piece
[01:41:46.400 --> 01:41:54.240]  of paper is labeled warrants. And here's another piece of paper labeled warrants and it says
[01:41:54.240 --> 01:42:04.200]  December 31st of 2007 total assessment $1213.19. This is very confusing because it looks like
[01:42:04.200 --> 01:42:14.440]  they've listed it twice somehow. But anyway, that says warrants, too. So, my own source
[01:42:14.440 --> 01:42:21.600]  of income is social security retirement. I have that put directly into a bank account
[01:42:21.600 --> 01:42:26.240]  and then I take the money out and it's not in there for much more than 30 and certainly
[01:42:26.240 --> 01:42:35.800]  not more than 60 days. And that's it. So, now I'm going to say hello. What does it sound
[01:42:35.800 --> 01:42:46.000]  like so far? Okay. I don't know enough about New York. I take
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:57.240]  it this is property tax. No, no. Income. Income tax. Oh. This is income tax. What happened
[01:42:57.240 --> 01:43:04.280]  was I had massive identity theft and what I did was I liquidated my IRAs early, received
[01:43:04.280 --> 01:43:10.640]  the penalty that I didn't pay for, and now I certainly can't pay for it. I try to live
[01:43:10.640 --> 01:43:18.960]  on less than poverty level. It's ridiculous what I try to live on. And these people know
[01:43:18.960 --> 01:43:24.880]  that. That's why the federal government forgave me of the debt after 10 years because I was
[01:43:24.880 --> 01:43:30.960]  uncollectable for 10 years and they knew it. And so, they left it alone and now I'm forgiven.
[01:43:30.960 --> 01:43:35.760]  But the state of New York... Wait, wait, wait. We're about to go to break. We'll pick this
[01:43:35.760 --> 01:43:41.760]  up on the other side. And I'm thinking there's very likely there are programs in New York
[01:43:41.760 --> 01:43:49.600]  to assist with this kind of issue. Hang on. Randy Kelton, Real Law Radio. Oh, I was going
[01:43:49.600 --> 01:43:58.840]  to give her a call-in number, but it's the last segment, so we'll be right back.
[01:43:58.840 --> 01:44:06.120]  Nutritious food is real body armor. It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and
[01:44:06.120 --> 01:44:10.840]  feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs. Did you know the U.S. government banned the
[01:44:10.840 --> 01:44:15.240]  hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as a Schedule 1 drug to
[01:44:15.240 --> 01:44:19.520]  hide it behind the marijuana plant? People have been confused about this plant for over
[01:44:19.520 --> 01:44:25.480]  80 years and many still don't know what hemp is. So now you know hemp is not marijuana
[01:44:25.480 --> 01:44:31.160]  and marijuana is not hemp. They are different varieties of the same species. HempUSA.org
[01:44:31.160 --> 01:44:35.720]  wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein
[01:44:35.720 --> 01:44:40.560]  powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about. Remember, hemp protein
[01:44:40.560 --> 01:44:47.160]  powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded
[01:44:47.160 --> 01:44:55.960]  with nutrients. Call 888-910-4367 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can
[01:44:55.960 --> 01:45:08.360]  do for you only at hempUSA.org. It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser
[01:45:08.360 --> 01:45:14.840]  and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works. Go to logosradionetwork.com and
[01:45:14.840 --> 01:45:21.520]  enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the
[01:45:21.520 --> 01:45:29.400]  grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR 15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:45:29.400 --> 01:45:35.560]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase
[01:45:35.560 --> 01:45:42.000]  Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation
[01:45:42.000 --> 01:45:47.080]  is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our
[01:45:47.080 --> 01:45:52.960]  fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:45:52.960 --> 01:45:59.040]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and
[01:45:59.040 --> 01:46:27.040]  donate today.
[01:46:30.040 --> 01:46:37.080]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton wheels our radio and we're talking to John in New York.
[01:46:37.080 --> 01:46:44.320]  And John, here lately, in spite of the nature of the show we do, which is how to fight these
[01:46:44.320 --> 01:46:52.840]  guys and beat them up, I've been getting calls that I'm prone to say, this may be something
[01:46:52.840 --> 01:47:02.120]  we shouldn't fight, but try to talk to these people and find a solution. You are not the
[01:47:02.120 --> 01:47:06.960]  only person in New York living on very limited income.
[01:47:06.960 --> 01:47:10.960]  Well, I know, and they don't care.
[01:47:10.960 --> 01:47:20.680]  Well, maybe, maybe. These agencies are manned by human beings at the end of the day. And
[01:47:20.680 --> 01:47:29.320]  I am going to bet that there are programs in New York to help people deal with these
[01:47:29.320 --> 01:47:39.320]  kinds of situations. If the IRS can forgive a tax debt and there's a good chance you can
[01:47:39.320 --> 01:47:48.120]  get this forgiven as well, especially if you can show that you're unable to pay it. Almost
[01:47:48.120 --> 01:47:57.760]  certainly there are some programs in place that will allow you to discharge this debt.
[01:47:57.760 --> 01:48:03.240]  So before you look at starting to fight with them, you might want to go talk to them and
[01:48:03.240 --> 01:48:05.040]  see what they've got available.
[01:48:05.040 --> 01:48:13.080]  Well, there's an advocate, but they're part of the state of New York, tax people. It's
[01:48:13.080 --> 01:48:23.320]  like asking the fox to get at the henhouse. No, no, not always. This is political. Politics
[01:48:23.320 --> 01:48:24.320]  permeates everything.
[01:48:24.320 --> 01:48:29.720]  Oh, I know. I know. And New York is the most corrupt state in the union. I don't care what
[01:48:29.720 --> 01:48:30.720]  anybody says.
[01:48:30.720 --> 01:48:40.360]  Well, I think after talking to Scott in Michigan, Michigan may have New York beat. Everybody
[01:48:40.360 --> 01:48:44.960]  I talk to all over the country always says that where they're living is the most corrupt
[01:48:44.960 --> 01:48:50.720]  place in the country. And I understand why they feel that way. But problem is, everything's
[01:48:50.720 --> 01:48:52.220]  corrupt.
[01:48:52.220 --> 01:48:59.840]  But even amongst the corruption, there are certain things, certain groups that are awful
[01:48:59.840 --> 01:49:09.880]  limits. The population is aging. I was born dead center baby boom. I'll be 70 next year.
[01:49:09.880 --> 01:49:14.760]  The population, the average population is pretty close to my age. So the population's
[01:49:14.760 --> 01:49:22.120]  getting older and older people are such a large voting section that they're not want
[01:49:22.120 --> 01:49:29.240]  to alienate this part of the population. So I'm going to bet they have programs to help
[01:49:29.240 --> 01:49:30.240]  with this.
[01:49:30.240 --> 01:49:35.600]  Well, they do and it's called and you call the advocate. But like I said, I think they're
[01:49:35.600 --> 01:49:41.360]  part of the same text people. So again, it's the fox guarding the henhouse.
[01:49:41.360 --> 01:49:48.160]  Okay, but have you talked to this sounds like an ombudsman?
[01:49:48.160 --> 01:49:54.920]  I did a long time ago. And listen to this. The I haven't heard any more from the debt
[01:49:54.920 --> 01:49:59.640]  collector. And I think what they realized was and they probably told us to the state
[01:49:59.640 --> 01:50:05.040]  of New York, there's not much we can do because this guy has only one form of income. And
[01:50:05.040 --> 01:50:09.560]  we can't touch it. So we're going to throw the ball back in your jab as a collector.
[01:50:09.560 --> 01:50:14.480]  So I know what's going to go on. It's going to bounce me back and forth. And they think
[01:50:14.480 --> 01:50:18.400]  they bounced me back to the state. Now the state's trying this official looking paper
[01:50:18.400 --> 01:50:19.400]  warrant.
[01:50:19.400 --> 01:50:21.400]  And yeah, okay.
[01:50:21.400 --> 01:50:27.120]  Okay, from what you said in that warrant, there's more of it. Warrant means more than
[01:50:27.120 --> 01:50:32.880]  just a warrant for someone's arrest. And it sounded like they were using warrant in a different
[01:50:32.880 --> 01:50:33.880]  context there.
[01:50:33.880 --> 01:50:36.600]  Yeah, no, I know, I know they were.
[01:50:36.600 --> 01:50:37.600]  I know.
[01:50:37.600 --> 01:50:43.280]  And so that's why I think they're getting on my case now, because the debt collector
[01:50:43.280 --> 01:50:47.120]  said, well, there's nothing we can do. We can't sue him. And he looked at the amount
[01:50:47.120 --> 01:50:53.400]  of income he has, and we can't touch it. It's very small. In the wintertime, Randy, I have
[01:50:53.400 --> 01:51:00.120]  to decide how much I'm going to eat and how much I'm going to eat. And that's a fact.
[01:51:00.120 --> 01:51:04.680]  And I don't buy shoelaces. There are a lot of things I don't buy. But anyway, I won't
[01:51:04.680 --> 01:51:05.680]  get into that.
[01:51:05.680 --> 01:51:12.680]  I live so far on the ground that it isn't funny. And I'm a little sick of this. Wave
[01:51:12.680 --> 01:51:18.360]  the flag, rah, rah, rah. Anyway, so there's that. What would you suggest? Who would you
[01:51:18.360 --> 01:51:22.760]  start with the advocate? Is there any way you can find out? I'm going to find out if
[01:51:22.760 --> 01:51:31.960]  there's, you know, who can help. And then, and if you could too, or someone can, I would
[01:51:31.960 --> 01:51:40.520]  be greatly appreciated. Then there's, I'm going to run this past you. You had told me,
[01:51:40.520 --> 01:51:47.800]  this separate issue, you had told me there's a way to use the UCC to eliminate debt collection
[01:51:47.800 --> 01:51:53.480]  debt. Now, we're not talking about debt collection debt here, but you had just told me that.
[01:51:53.480 --> 01:51:58.680]  Now, is there a way, having nothing to do with debt collectors, is there a way without
[01:51:58.680 --> 01:52:06.920]  filing bankruptcy to use the UCC to eliminate credit card debt? I'm current. I make by minimum
[01:52:06.920 --> 01:52:12.160]  payments. It's killing me. I got about $6,000 left. At this rate, it's going to take me
[01:52:12.160 --> 01:52:20.080]  about 20 years or more. And so, is there a way to use the UCC to eliminate debt collection,
[01:52:20.080 --> 01:52:26.000]  or excuse me, to eliminate credit card debt, which has nothing to do with a debt collector?
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:30.640]  Because I'm current. I'm a good little boy and I make by minimum payment. I'm a good
[01:52:30.640 --> 01:52:38.560]  little slave. There probably is a way. And in an email,
[01:52:38.560 --> 01:52:46.400]  I sent you, I will refer you to Pastor Massad. He's in upstate New York. Do you happen to know
[01:52:46.400 --> 01:52:55.440]  where Little Falls is? I sure do. But he lives just north of Little Falls,
[01:52:57.200 --> 01:53:05.040]  right across the Canadian River from the Herkimer Diamond mines. And he does, I do a show on his
[01:53:05.040 --> 01:53:15.440]  network every Monday. But he has a number of people that specialize in UCC. So he would be
[01:53:15.440 --> 01:53:24.320]  able to tell you a lot more than I do, than I can. Okay. But when I was working on foreclosures
[01:53:24.320 --> 01:53:31.680]  and such, I went through the UCC and it became clear to me that the consumer protection laws
[01:53:31.680 --> 01:53:40.080]  were a scam. The reason I say that is, is every remedy that I found in the consumer protection
[01:53:40.080 --> 01:53:46.960]  laws, I found in the UCC. And they probably were watered down in the consumer protection law?
[01:53:48.240 --> 01:53:51.440]  No, it wasn't. I'm not sure that they were watered down.
[01:53:52.800 --> 01:53:59.280]  The consumer protection laws set a very short statute of limitations,
[01:53:59.280 --> 01:54:06.000]  where the UCC did not. And it appeared to me as though they were trying to direct people to the
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:13.120]  consumer protection laws, so that they would think they only had a year or two years to exercise the
[01:54:13.120 --> 01:54:19.040]  option. Now, that's a very short time when you're dealing with a 30-year mortgage.
[01:54:20.320 --> 01:54:21.360]  Yeah, that's right.
[01:54:21.360 --> 01:54:30.880]  The UCC did not have those kinds of limitations. So it appeared as though they were trying to
[01:54:31.680 --> 01:54:36.640]  focus people away from the UCC and towards the consumer protection laws. And then, of course,
[01:54:37.280 --> 01:54:42.560]  just by the time you figure out you have a problem, you're already beyond the scope of the consumer
[01:54:42.560 --> 01:54:52.160]  protection laws. That was my position there. But it's been a long time since I've worked with it,
[01:54:52.160 --> 01:55:00.560]  so I don't really have the answer that you need for that part. But I'm wondering,
[01:55:00.560 --> 01:55:02.160]  why wouldn't you file bankruptcy?
[01:55:03.840 --> 01:55:09.040]  Well, it's $1,500. At least $1,500. I don't have...
[01:55:09.040 --> 01:55:11.760]  No, no, no. File for inability to pay.
[01:55:14.080 --> 01:55:15.200]  What do you mean? Explain.
[01:55:15.920 --> 01:55:20.720]  Just file for inability to pay. Inability to pay doesn't mean you don't have any money.
[01:55:21.600 --> 01:55:26.720]  It means that if you had to pay this, it would cause an undue hardship.
[01:55:27.760 --> 01:55:31.040]  That is not hard to get in the Fed, especially bankruptcy.
[01:55:32.240 --> 01:55:35.920]  Yeah. Oh, yeah. I'm already an undue hardship. You should see...
[01:55:35.920 --> 01:55:44.960]  Yeah. It's really relatively simple. You file a chapter 7.
[01:55:46.560 --> 01:55:52.320]  You claim all the debts is unsecured. And as a rule, credit cards just go away,
[01:55:53.200 --> 01:55:55.360]  because they can't come in and prove up their case.
[01:55:55.360 --> 01:56:07.360]  So, if you file for inability to pay, if you're on Social Security, you absolutely qualify.
[01:56:08.320 --> 01:56:14.960]  Won't cost you anything, and you will find that the federal clerks are extremely helpful.
[01:56:16.720 --> 01:56:17.760]  How do I get the part federal?
[01:56:17.760 --> 01:56:19.760]  It's required to be by statute.
[01:56:20.960 --> 01:56:22.240]  Okay. Where do I find it?
[01:56:22.240 --> 01:56:25.840]  The federal court, the federal bankruptcy court.
[01:56:27.840 --> 01:56:29.120]  And I can do this pro se?
[01:56:29.920 --> 01:56:35.760]  Yeah. Yeah. You just go in. They've got a set of forms you can fill on a couple hours,
[01:56:36.800 --> 01:56:40.720]  and they'll help you. They'll show if you see anything wrong with it. They're very helpful.
[01:56:40.720 --> 01:56:50.480]  The government officials are not always bad guys, and especially in bankruptcy.
[01:56:52.720 --> 01:56:57.200]  You will be surprised how helpful they will be, and that'll make this go away. Poof.
[01:56:57.200 --> 01:57:10.400]  Poof. Okay. The question is, the money that they're going to discharge, then I have to claim that as income.
[01:57:10.400 --> 01:57:12.400]  Is that correct?
[01:57:13.040 --> 01:57:18.880]  No, no, no. That's not how that works. They can't prove up their claim.
[01:57:18.880 --> 01:57:26.720]  So, that's just a debt that you don't have to pay. So, it doesn't come back as income.
[01:57:28.240 --> 01:57:34.080]  I see. Oh, I got you. Yeah. I see. In other words, I didn't know it. Please, please.
[01:57:35.760 --> 01:57:39.280]  If it came back and you had to pay it anyway, it would be your defeat to purpose.
[01:57:40.400 --> 01:57:41.520]  Right.
[01:57:41.520 --> 01:57:49.360]  I felt bankruptcy over 20 years ago, and $100,000 worth of credit card debt puff gone.
[01:57:51.680 --> 01:57:52.640]  And you did it yourself?
[01:57:54.400 --> 01:58:00.960]  No, I used an attorney back then. I didn't know any better. Now I know better. I can just go down
[01:58:00.960 --> 01:58:08.000]  and it cost me $2,000, I think, back then. But now you can just, then I didn't know I could go down
[01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:12.400]  and file for inability to pay, feel out to pay for work, and it all goes away.
[01:58:13.360 --> 01:58:19.200]  Okay, inability to pay. Real fast, we got somebody who got two traffic tickets.
[01:58:19.840 --> 01:58:23.440]  Hold on. We are out of time. Oh, sorry. Sorry.
[01:58:24.320 --> 01:58:31.040]  This is Randy Kelton, Rue Valradio. We'll be back next week on our regular Thursday and Friday
[01:58:31.040 --> 01:58:37.040]  night show and make sure you catch Eddie Craig's Monday night traffic show. Thank you all for
[01:58:37.040 --> 01:58:38.880]  listening and good night.
[01:58:50.240 --> 01:58:56.640]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.640 --> 01:59:02.080]  Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.080 --> 01:59:09.600]  what the Bible says, okay, helping you to know the meaning of life. Order your free copy today
[01:59:09.600 --> 01:59:20.560]  from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.560 --> 01:59:26.080]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.080 --> 01:59:31.760]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is truly a Bible you can
[01:59:31.760 --> 01:59:37.040]  understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free
[01:59:37.040 --> 01:59:53.520]  at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. Looking for some truth? You found it.