ROL_2018-09-07_16k_Hr3-4.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:07.840] The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli
[00:07.840 --> 00:15.480] bulletins for the commodities market, today's history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:15.480 --> 00:23.680] into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.680 --> 00:31.120] Catch for the 11th of April 2018, closed with gold $1,353.22 in ounce, silver $16.68
[00:31.120 --> 00:41.360] in ounce, Texas crude $65.51 of barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80, bitcoin
[00:41.360 --> 00:55.680] cash at $652.90, and finally litecoins at $114.34, a crypto coin.
[00:55.680 --> 01:01.280] Today in history, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01.280 --> 01:06.760] of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion,
[01:06.760 --> 01:12.480] sex, or national origin. It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements,
[01:12.480 --> 01:16.880] racial segregation in public schools, and employment, and public accommodations for
[01:16.880 --> 01:24.080] places of business, today in history.
[01:24.080 --> 01:28.080] In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:28.080 --> 01:32.400] on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:32.400 --> 01:36.840] is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:36.840 --> 01:41.560] United States, and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:41.560 --> 01:46.400] evidence as of yet. President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows
[01:46.400 --> 01:50.480] to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will
[01:50.480 --> 01:55.080] be coming in nice and new and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners
[01:55.080 --> 01:59.520] with a gas-killing animal who kills its people and enjoys it. Many in the West, including
[01:59.520 --> 02:04.600] President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted
[02:04.600 --> 02:09.720] by Assad and his forces. Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since
[02:09.720 --> 02:14.080] yesterday for the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to investigate the site
[02:14.080 --> 02:18.880] of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's
[02:18.880 --> 02:23.760] seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad
[02:23.760 --> 02:28.600] Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one
[02:28.600 --> 02:33.120] of the more notorious swimmer groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels. Now, surprised
[02:33.120 --> 02:38.520] then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook that smart
[02:38.520 --> 02:43.000] missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which has
[02:43.000 --> 02:47.200] been fighting terrorists? Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[02:47.200 --> 02:51.000] strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[02:51.000 --> 03:02.000] This was Perk Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[03:02.000 --> 03:25.840] Well, I received my remedy today. It came in a box just like they say. I accepted for
[03:25.840 --> 03:35.660] 7 days as flat-out smoke. There is no way I would go so far with Filter 1 or my parents
[03:35.660 --> 03:50.920] and my friends, I agree. Because I've done everything myself. But I always have and are
[03:50.920 --> 04:14.040] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio. And we're talking to Brett in Texas.
[04:14.040 --> 04:23.920] Okay, Brett, so this was the judge absolutely, clearly threatened you. Oh, yeah. I'm amazed that he
[04:23.920 --> 04:36.000] was this careless. I mean, you were already going after him. This is beyond carelessness. This is
[04:36.000 --> 04:47.320] hubris. You filed this with the state commission on judicial conduct. They're likely to go after him.
[04:47.320 --> 05:00.520] This would be more than I would expect. This was over the top. The judge is indicating that
[05:00.520 --> 05:07.480] they're all his buddies and he knows them all and they'll protect him. Yeah, he said, well, I just
[05:07.480 --> 05:14.280] want you to know that out of all those complaints you filed, not one of them has even given me a
[05:14.280 --> 05:22.280] call. So they obviously didn't see fit to do anything about it, just so you know. And what did
[05:22.280 --> 05:38.000] you say? Okay. Good. Perfect. He was clearly baiting you. And you didn't take the bait. But you have
[05:38.000 --> 05:48.200] to know in order for him to just speak out this much, this had to really bother him. It must
[05:48.200 --> 05:53.000] have, which was actually encouraging to me. I think he did the opposite of what he intended,
[05:53.000 --> 05:59.840] because I've never seen any improvement in everything that we've been doing. We still get
[05:59.840 --> 06:05.520] the same behavior out of these corrupt public officials. And I don't have any personal experience
[06:05.520 --> 06:11.240] that says that there's anything that touches them. And this was an indication that there's a soft
[06:11.240 --> 06:20.760] underbelly somewhere. That was a crack in the cosmic egg. If it really didn't bother him,
[06:20.760 --> 06:31.320] he would have kept his mouth shut. Right. I get the impression he's terrified. Because there's
[06:31.320 --> 06:35.360] likely to be somebody out there that doesn't like him. There's likely to be some judge out
[06:35.360 --> 06:44.080] there that doesn't like him. And that's his question about where they went. Yeah, exactly. It only
[06:44.080 --> 06:52.160] takes one. And he really didn't seem to like the idea that going to the grand jury. If he didn't
[06:52.160 --> 06:55.880] like the district attorneys hearing about it, he sure didn't like to hear that there were grand jury
[06:55.880 --> 07:06.160] noises. Yeah, because they know for certain that grand jury is always a crapshoot. It's
[07:06.160 --> 07:14.600] hard to get a public official indicted. But it's still always a cra- This is traffic. And what
[07:14.600 --> 07:21.880] if he gets somebody on the grand jury that he screwed in a traffic court? And they read what
[07:21.880 --> 07:33.000] went on here and they think, that Jack Legg did that to me. The judge could be toast. Not only
[07:33.000 --> 07:45.720] his position as a judge, but his bar card. So it was a major tell that he spoke out. That was
[07:45.720 --> 07:53.640] really a bad move. So good, good. You mentioned something one time about, you said, I'm not
[07:53.640 --> 07:57.760] trying to get these officials to lose their job or destroy their career. That happened,
[07:57.760 --> 08:03.080] it's on them. But you know, you mentioned something that really made sense. You said,
[08:03.080 --> 08:08.000] if we get this guy out of here, now that corrupt guy is gone. There's another corrupt guy that'll
[08:08.000 --> 08:11.920] step up and take his place. We don't want to get him to lose his job necessarily. We just
[08:11.920 --> 08:19.360] want him to change his ways. And that made a lot of sense to me. Yeah. And when I had that as a
[08:19.360 --> 08:24.240] mindset going in there, I don't get disappointed when they do the wrong thing. And I don't get
[08:24.240 --> 08:28.760] disappointed if they do the right thing, which they probably are never going to do. But you know,
[08:28.760 --> 08:36.000] it's, it helps me to set my mind appropriately. And you mentioned something a moment ago when
[08:36.000 --> 08:40.240] Jeff in South Carolina was on the line, about a mayor, and I've never really thought of it
[08:40.240 --> 08:49.480] like this. But do you think it's possible for me to, or would it be worthwhile, I guess, to call
[08:49.480 --> 08:56.240] out the mayor and say, and mayor of Plano and say, hey, you've got three corrupt judges. You've got
[08:56.240 --> 09:03.760] four people in your prosecution team that are felons. You have a felonious police chief. You
[09:03.760 --> 09:11.840] have two felonious clerks here. You've got all these people or felons that you're responsible.
[09:11.840 --> 09:17.760] Call the mayor out. Put his name on the line. Exactly. File against him as a respondee and
[09:17.760 --> 09:26.040] superior. You didn't hire the chief of police. And you didn't hire the judges or the prosecutors.
[09:26.040 --> 09:34.520] Mayor did that. And you didn't train or direct these public officials in their behavior. The
[09:34.520 --> 09:41.280] mayor did that. So the mayor is responding at superior. He has taken no action to remediate
[09:41.280 --> 09:49.480] these problems. I filed against him. You don't care if he gets indicted or not.
[09:49.480 --> 09:58.840] Would it be the directing the crime ring kind of a thing? RICO, ongoing criminal conspiracy.
[09:58.840 --> 10:05.440] And he's the ringleader. I'm lost as soon as we start talking federal. I don't know yet.
[10:05.440 --> 10:17.880] Chapter 71, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Street gang. Street gang is the Texas RICO
[10:17.880 --> 10:28.880] statute. Go to chapter 71 and read the definition of the street gang. Yes, I have. And so this
[10:28.880 --> 10:36.120] meets the definition. The fact the word street gang implies a bunch of guys on the street
[10:36.120 --> 10:44.560] corner. That's not what the code describes. It describes a criminal enterprise with a
[10:44.560 --> 10:55.560] recognizable hierarchy. That's what we got here. And petition for court of inquiry was
[10:55.560 --> 11:03.760] reading up on that and apparently judges hate courts of inquiry. They consider it to be
[11:03.760 --> 11:12.720] absolutely patently unfair to them. I read that and I said, wonderful. That sounds like
[11:12.720 --> 11:23.960] a turnabout fair play. Exactly. So we start petitioning for court of inquiry. And the
[11:23.960 --> 11:35.080] way I read it, they appear to give the judge discretion. But where you file criminal accusations
[11:35.080 --> 11:40.840] along with associated evidence sufficient to give a reasonable person of ordinary prudence
[11:40.840 --> 11:46.480] caused to believe the crime has been committed. And you request a court of inquiry from a
[11:46.480 --> 11:52.720] district judge and he doesn't request one when there's sufficient evidence to indicate
[11:52.720 --> 11:59.120] a crime has been committed. Then you file against him for acting in concert and collusion.
[11:59.120 --> 12:12.440] And let him show where he had discretion to ignore crime. He's a magistrate and effectively
[12:12.440 --> 12:25.800] a court of inquiry is a process similar to an examining trial for public officials. And
[12:25.800 --> 12:29.840] specifically he was a magistrate and was given known that crimes had been committed. He had
[12:29.840 --> 12:38.320] a duty to hold an examining trial. But he had an option to request a court of inquiry.
[12:38.320 --> 12:46.640] He didn't either one of them. So he filed to with another district judge. I'm against
[12:46.640 --> 12:55.360] this one. See how that works out for him. Judges have territorial limits. Not that I
[12:55.360 --> 13:04.240] know of state. You can't file one outside the state. But I don't see anything you know
[13:04.240 --> 13:11.960] state judges, district judges or state judges. They used to ride a circuit, but we got so
[13:11.960 --> 13:16.960] many people and so many judges that they don't have to do that anymore. But they're still
[13:16.960 --> 13:17.960] state judges.
[13:17.960 --> 13:27.840] That's just like the grand jury then. Just like the grand jury. Okay. Now while they
[13:27.840 --> 13:36.360] can't, well anyway, they're magistrates in any case. An attorney general opinion H500.
[13:36.360 --> 13:47.000] A JP from one county heard a criminal complaint against someone from another county. They
[13:47.000 --> 13:51.880] arrested this guy and brought him before this JP because she's the only one available. But
[13:51.880 --> 13:58.520] she's in a different county. And they objected saying that the JP didn't have jurisdiction
[13:58.520 --> 14:04.360] and what the attorney general came back with. And I had a judge shipment tell me once that
[14:04.360 --> 14:10.120] as far as he was concerned, I could use an attorney general's opinion for toilet paper.
[14:10.120 --> 14:16.760] I said with all due respect, your honor, an attorney general opinion is filed in the form
[14:16.760 --> 14:25.560] of a legal brief. I hope you don't find the underlying diary desiccists quite so versatile.
[14:25.560 --> 14:48.040] I did enjoy that. But so the attorney general ruled that any magistrate may hear any complaint
[14:48.040 --> 15:01.400] from anywhere in the state, state or federal. So a magistrate has statewide jurisdiction
[15:01.400 --> 15:06.080] and can hear federal complaints because all they're doing is making a determination of
[15:06.080 --> 15:12.240] probable cause. And they have a duty to do that. I told Bob Perkins, the head criminal
[15:12.240 --> 15:16.880] district judge for Travis County at the time, when I bushwhacked him with criminal complaints,
[15:16.880 --> 15:23.040] he said, well, Mr. Kelton, no, I went in with my pulled my go in with your suit while they're
[15:23.040 --> 15:31.320] having the motion hearings point of view. Come here. I hate that. So right away, he knows
[15:31.320 --> 15:36.080] I'm not an attorney because I'm not coming in there. Meek is a lamb. He comes over. May
[15:36.080 --> 15:40.200] I help you? Yes, you can instruct. My name is Randall Kelton. I don't want him asking
[15:40.200 --> 15:44.720] me any questions. Instruct the judge that I have business with the court. May I tell
[15:44.720 --> 15:47.840] him the nature of the business? No, you may not. I have business with the court and it's
[15:47.840 --> 15:52.360] none of yours. You're dismissed. And I put my fingers at him and went over and sat down
[15:52.360 --> 16:00.720] and he is shaking. He's so furious. I got him mad. So we run up to the judge and there's
[16:00.720 --> 16:06.720] some jerk out here. Tell me who he is, blah, blah, blah. And I dropped these complaints
[16:06.720 --> 16:11.560] on the judge and he looks at them. He said, well, Mr. Kelton, these are criminal complaints.
[16:11.560 --> 16:18.280] As a matter of fact, they are. Well, Mr. Kelton, I am a district judge in Travis County and
[16:18.280 --> 16:22.120] district judges in Travis County don't take criminal complaints. I said, well, that's
[16:22.120 --> 16:28.200] okay, judge. I'm not here to invoke your duty as a district judge. I'm here to invoke your
[16:28.200 --> 16:33.560] duty as a magistrate and that's a duty from which you may not shield yourself. And that's
[16:33.560 --> 16:37.280] when he sat back in his chair and he looked at me and he looked at the bailiff and I know
[16:37.280 --> 16:46.640] what he was thinking. If I have my bailiff shoot this guy, can I get away with it? He
[16:46.640 --> 16:57.280] knew, he recognized he's on this dime. So every judge is a magistrate. So any judge
[16:57.280 --> 17:03.920] can, based on that.
[17:03.920 --> 17:09.840] That's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central
[17:09.840 --> 17:17.080] Texas Gun Works. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a
[17:17.080 --> 17:23.200] chance to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes
[17:23.200 --> 17:29.760] Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's
[17:29.760 --> 17:36.080] e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar
[17:36.080 --> 17:43.120] and get 10 chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've
[17:43.120 --> 17:48.000] enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing
[17:48.000 --> 17:55.120] you the best quality programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:55.120 --> 18:02.080] Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today. Are you being harassed by debt
[18:02.080 --> 18:07.360] collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the
[18:07.360 --> 18:12.360] Michael Mearris proven method. Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against
[18:12.360 --> 18:17.640] debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[18:17.640 --> 18:22.480] on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute. What to do when contacted
[18:22.480 --> 18:28.000] by phones, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors
[18:28.000 --> 18:32.560] out of your credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay
[18:32.560 --> 18:38.000] you to go away? The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt
[18:38.000 --> 18:43.040] collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit
[18:43.040 --> 18:55.920] www.ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris
[18:55.920 --> 19:23.920] at www.ruleoflawradio.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:23.920 --> 19:49.920] That's all for now. I hope you enjoyed this video. Thank you and see you in the next one.
[19:53.920 --> 20:04.720] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Ruleof Law Radio on this Friday the 7th day of September
[20:04.720 --> 20:13.400] 2018 and we're talking to, well we were talking to Brett, but Brett must have dropped off.
[20:13.400 --> 20:17.920] So I guess we were done with Brett. Now we're going to Shawn in Nebraska. Hello Shawn.
[20:17.920 --> 20:25.560] Hi Randy, how are you doing? Doing good. Good. First of all, I'd like to thank all
[20:25.560 --> 20:32.880] of you at Ruleof Law Radio for your selfless service and I first heard about you guys through
[20:32.880 --> 20:41.120] and for wars. Eddie Craig did a presentation with Jakari Jackson I think and I got interested
[20:41.120 --> 20:48.640] in the traffic, you know, traffic law and I've been trying to reverse engineer the code
[20:48.640 --> 20:55.360] here in Nebraska and Iowa. I had a little bit of a success last year politically but
[20:55.360 --> 21:01.160] I didn't understand that I had that political success until I started listening to you and
[21:01.160 --> 21:11.400] your philosophy and so on. And now I have landed into something a lot more, a lot heavier
[21:11.400 --> 21:20.040] you might say. I've got a couple questions regarding injunctions, complaint and injunctions
[21:20.040 --> 21:31.720] or sorry, complaint and request for injunction. Nature of the complaint? Nature of the complaint?
[21:31.720 --> 21:39.480] Oh it's a, well let's see. No it'd be like, it's against the state, I want the state
[21:39.480 --> 21:49.760] to cease action on a, I think I'd better start. Okay, basically I was falsely accused of
[21:49.760 --> 21:57.280] a felony crime and through the course of it I was incarcerated for nine months on an
[21:57.280 --> 22:11.000] extremely high bond. I found due process violations, official oppression, misconduct. Was an adjudication
[22:11.000 --> 22:24.840] on the felony issue? I was offered a deal and I did talk to Eddie, I gave him a few
[22:24.840 --> 22:30.280] more details. Basically prosecutor used the plea agreement coercively as a bargaining
[22:30.280 --> 22:43.400] chip. Okay hold on, let me qualify. If liberty first, take the deal. When they're looking
[22:43.400 --> 22:48.240] at throwing you in jail for a long time, take the deal. We can come back and fight them
[22:48.240 --> 22:53.960] later but first you can't fight them if you're in jail. So get your liberty first so if you
[22:53.960 --> 22:59.640] took a deal you're not going to get any complaints from me.
[22:59.640 --> 23:07.600] Okay so basically the terms of the deal were that I plead no contest, agree to waive sufficiency
[23:07.600 --> 23:14.480] of evidence for factual basis for purposes of an appeal, state agrees to submit its sentencing
[23:14.480 --> 23:23.480] and agrees to lower my bond to 10,000, 10% when it was at 100,000. So essentially before
[23:23.480 --> 23:30.160] I sign the piece of paper, I'm a threat to society. The next day you're okay, yeah you
[23:30.160 --> 23:37.200] can go wander around. So that's the coercive issue with it. I filed with federal and the
[23:37.200 --> 23:42.720] state, the federal, I have a docket number now, I don't even know what to do from here,
[23:42.720 --> 23:48.560] I'm obviously going to have to research that. I have nothing finalized until the end of
[23:48.560 --> 23:53.240] this month that is sentencing. I'm trying to apply, I want to apply political pressure
[23:53.240 --> 24:00.120] like you describe. I've worked up some criminal complaints, I filed a bond grievance against
[24:00.120 --> 24:07.160] a prosecutor. Essentially they excluded tax and evidence that were exonerating intentionally
[24:07.160 --> 24:08.640] and I can prove it.
[24:08.640 --> 24:15.440] Okay, are you familiar with the American Bar Association standards for the prosecution
[24:15.440 --> 24:26.680] function? I'm aware of it, I am not familiar with it. It used to say it is an ethical conduct
[24:26.680 --> 24:31.360] for a prosecuting attorney to refrain from pursuing evidence solely because the evidence
[24:31.360 --> 24:36.120] will show the innocence of the accused or mitigate the guilt of the accused. Standard
[24:36.120 --> 24:51.720] 3-3.11. You should look that up. If the prosecutor, you can reference, do you have a pencil? Write
[24:51.720 --> 25:01.120] down Michael Morton at Texas. Reference that act. Michael Morton was prosecuted in Williamson
[25:01.120 --> 25:08.560] County for murder of his wife when the prosecutor had evidence that would conclusively prove
[25:08.560 --> 25:16.440] that he did not commit the murder. The innocence project came in, ran DNA and proved he was
[25:16.440 --> 25:23.920] innocent. He spent 20 years in prison. Wow. The prosecuting attorney wound up going to
[25:23.920 --> 25:34.360] jail over that. The legislature passed different laws concerning discovery, the cost of that
[25:34.360 --> 25:39.480] and called it the Michael Morton Act. It's codified into law as Texas Code of Criminal
[25:39.480 --> 25:44.840] Procedure 39.14.
[25:44.840 --> 25:53.280] And while you may not have that in Nebraska under good faith and, I forget the term, good
[25:53.280 --> 26:04.000] faith in something else, you can bring this in and say, this is what happened and, okay,
[26:04.000 --> 26:14.200] if a legislature of one state has addressed, specifically addressed an issue and a legislature
[26:14.200 --> 26:21.480] of another state has not expressly addressed that issue. The legislature of each state
[26:21.480 --> 26:29.360] respects the legislature of every other state. Right. So you can bring the Michael Morton
[26:29.360 --> 26:38.880] Act into Nebraska to show the improper actions of the prosecutor and how these actions were
[26:38.880 --> 26:48.360] addressed in Texas and claim that the state of Nebraska should recognize this as a equitable
[26:48.360 --> 26:56.480] remedy or a showing of impropriety on the part of the prosecutor. The prosecutor suppressed
[26:56.480 --> 27:09.800] evidence, best criminals. However, if you haven't been sentenced yet, do not poke the
[27:09.800 --> 27:12.400] bear quite yet.
[27:12.400 --> 27:18.080] Uh-oh. So the filings on the injunctions were not good?
[27:18.080 --> 27:24.720] Probably not. They were probably premature because you don't want the court to throw
[27:24.720 --> 27:26.760] the book at you.
[27:26.760 --> 27:33.400] Yeah, and I did file that bar grievance, but it was against the current one. I was
[27:33.400 --> 27:34.400] just...
[27:34.400 --> 27:35.400] He agrees to stay in silent, but...
[27:35.400 --> 27:36.400] Yeah, so...
[27:36.400 --> 27:44.120] If the prosecutor says one word about that bar grievance or if you get any idea that
[27:44.120 --> 27:50.160] the judge knows about that bar grievance, then whatever sentence they give you, you
[27:50.160 --> 28:00.160] can challenge it because the bar grieve is forbidden to mention it.
[28:00.160 --> 28:06.840] Any mention of that bar grievance would be to improperly influence the court.
[28:06.840 --> 28:16.720] So you can't undo what's been done, but try not to poke the bear too much until...
[28:16.720 --> 28:22.400] Have they given you a... Okay, in the deal have they gave you sentencing what they intend
[28:22.400 --> 28:23.400] to do?
[28:23.400 --> 28:32.480] Uh, well, let's put it this way. People with my charges are not walking around, period.
[28:32.480 --> 28:42.560] So, I mean, the state lowered my bond 90 percent. The prosecutor and my attorney both...
[28:42.560 --> 28:48.520] You agreed to a deal, did they agree to a sentencing structure?
[28:48.520 --> 28:52.560] The judge, yes, but the judge is not bound to it.
[28:52.560 --> 28:59.040] No, but they'll 99 percent of the time they'll accept whatever the prosecutor brings up.
[28:59.040 --> 29:05.560] Yeah, it was zero to 20, for a time served, I guess.
[29:05.560 --> 29:11.280] Zero to 20 was the deal?
[29:11.280 --> 29:13.280] Yeah.
[29:13.280 --> 29:15.280] Ooh.
[29:15.280 --> 29:17.280] Yeah.
[29:17.280 --> 29:20.280] Don't poke that bear.
[29:20.280 --> 29:22.280] I'm going to hunch.
[29:22.280 --> 29:28.280] All right. Well, I wonder, I mean, okay, so I won't file these criminal complaints.
[29:28.280 --> 29:36.280] You can always appeal afterward. Once this deal is done, then you can file actions to undo
[29:36.280 --> 29:38.280] anything that was improper.
[29:38.280 --> 29:45.280] My concern there is, as my attorney said, that if I did that, that we could challenge the
[29:45.280 --> 29:51.280] sufficiency of evidence, but he is seeing people get thrown back in jail over it.
[29:51.280 --> 29:55.280] So, sit and wait on that, you know.
[29:55.280 --> 30:04.280] Well, first, first, protect...
[30:04.280 --> 30:09.280] Despite all mineral fights, cancer, fatigue, and high blood pressure, plus it does wonders
[30:09.280 --> 30:12.280] for your thyroid, liver, and immune system.
[30:12.280 --> 30:17.280] And Dr. Kaffir and Albrecht, in a moment, I'll let you know what this important, healthy nutrient is.
[30:17.280 --> 30:23.280] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:23.280 --> 30:28.280] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:28.280 --> 30:33.280] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.280 --> 30:38.280] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.280 --> 30:42.280] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.280 --> 30:46.280] Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.280 --> 30:50.280] When you think of nutritional deficiencies, you probably think of third-world countries,
[30:50.280 --> 30:54.280] or maybe you think of iron, folic acid, or vitamin C.
[30:54.280 --> 30:59.280] But nutritionists say many of us don't get enough iodine, a trace mineral that's essential for
[30:59.280 --> 31:04.280] thyroid and immune function. Iodine is found in seafood, egg yolks, meat, and milk,
[31:04.280 --> 31:09.280] and it's added to iodized salt. Vegetarians can get it through seaweed.
[31:09.280 --> 31:15.280] But because the body does not make iodine, experts say up to three-quarters of us may be deficient,
[31:15.280 --> 31:19.280] and that can lead to weight gain, depression, and even cancer.
[31:19.280 --> 31:24.280] So put the eye back into iodine and check with your doctor to make sure you're getting enough.
[31:24.280 --> 31:29.280] I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:54.280 --> 31:59.280] Rural Law Radio is proud to offer the Rural Law Traffic Seminar.
[31:59.280 --> 32:04.280] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:04.280 --> 32:07.280] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:07.280 --> 32:11.280] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:11.280 --> 32:14.280] and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:14.280 --> 32:19.280] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce the law.
[32:19.280 --> 32:24.280] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rural Law Radio,
[32:24.280 --> 32:29.280] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[32:29.280 --> 32:31.280] and how to hold courts to the Rural Law.
[32:31.280 --> 32:35.280] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuralLawRadio.com
[32:35.280 --> 32:37.280] and ordering your copy today.
[32:37.280 --> 32:41.280] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[32:41.280 --> 32:44.280] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:44.280 --> 32:47.280] Hundreds of recent reviews have been made on the Rural Law Radio,
[32:47.280 --> 32:49.280] the original 2009 seminar.
[32:49.280 --> 32:51.280] Hundreds of research documents and further useful resource material.
[32:51.280 --> 32:55.280] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuralLawRadio.com.
[32:55.280 --> 33:20.280] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:20.280 --> 33:29.280] Okay, we are back.
[33:29.280 --> 33:31.280] I think we're back.
[33:31.280 --> 33:33.280] I hit that button right.
[33:33.280 --> 33:38.280] I'm right on the board myself tonight, so I didn't hear it beep when I first hit the button.
[33:38.280 --> 33:40.280] Is there, Sean?
[33:40.280 --> 33:42.280] Yep, but I'm here.
[33:42.280 --> 33:45.280] Okay, I hit the button right then.
[33:45.280 --> 33:50.280] Okay, it has a beep that almost blows out my ear drums.
[33:50.280 --> 33:53.280] And I didn't hear it, so I hit it again.
[33:53.280 --> 33:57.280] And the problem with it is that particular link is a toggle.
[33:57.280 --> 34:03.280] So if I toggle myself on, then I would have toggled myself off and I wasn't sure where I was at.
[34:03.280 --> 34:05.280] Okay, I'm on.
[34:05.280 --> 34:08.280] I thought I made a mistake, but I was mistaken.
[34:08.280 --> 34:10.280] First time.
[34:10.280 --> 34:12.280] I thought you missed it.
[34:12.280 --> 34:17.280] Okay, my suggestion is, always my suggestion is liberty first.
[34:17.280 --> 34:25.280] You know, I'm a political activist, a legal reformist, and I want to change the system.
[34:25.280 --> 34:29.280] You're not going to change the system from a jail cell.
[34:29.280 --> 34:31.280] And that's short and long of it.
[34:31.280 --> 34:34.280] I'm not a purist.
[34:34.280 --> 34:35.280] I am a pragmatist.
[34:35.280 --> 34:38.280] I'm a combat veteran.
[34:38.280 --> 34:43.280] And combat veterans do not have these lofty ideals.
[34:43.280 --> 34:45.280] They have objectives.
[34:45.280 --> 34:49.280] And you do what you must to secure the objective.
[34:49.280 --> 34:52.280] Yes, that's what I did.
[34:52.280 --> 34:54.280] Liberty first.
[34:54.280 --> 34:56.280] Then we fight for the right of things.
[34:56.280 --> 35:03.280] Okay, so what is it that you want to do?
[35:03.280 --> 35:12.280] Well, I've heard I've got a Kingman judge who's a great vine and other attorney.
[35:12.280 --> 35:17.280] And I don't know what he's going to do.
[35:17.280 --> 35:22.280] The prosecutor said that he didn't think I'd get any time or anything,
[35:22.280 --> 35:28.280] and my attorney agreed, and so on and so forth.
[35:28.280 --> 35:33.280] I guess what I was hoping to do was find a political pressure reform to throw it out
[35:33.280 --> 35:37.280] because they're going to see that I have a good case for a lawsuit.
[35:37.280 --> 35:38.280] No, that don't work.
[35:38.280 --> 35:39.280] That don't work.
[35:39.280 --> 35:41.280] Okay, okay.
[35:41.280 --> 35:45.280] Yeah, that's a consideration, but it's a false consideration.
[35:45.280 --> 35:50.280] You would think that they would be subject to these kinds of pressures, but they're not.
[35:50.280 --> 35:54.280] Okay, and I can see why they wouldn't be.
[35:54.280 --> 35:56.280] Yeah, they don't care.
[35:56.280 --> 36:03.280] If you have a hanging judge, you have to be careful.
[36:03.280 --> 36:11.280] If you have a hanging judge, I'm not sure, always sure what a hanging judge means.
[36:11.280 --> 36:18.280] Often judges that are sticklers for rule of law are called hanging judges
[36:18.280 --> 36:20.280] because they follow code more closely.
[36:20.280 --> 36:25.280] They don't do what they feel like doing so much.
[36:25.280 --> 36:32.280] So if that's the case with this judge and you have filed actions to indicate that you think there are improprieties,
[36:32.280 --> 36:38.280] he may actually pay attention to that because most people don't do that,
[36:38.280 --> 36:40.280] especially if they're guilty.
[36:40.280 --> 36:46.280] The last thing a guilty person is going to do is go after the prosecutor.
[36:46.280 --> 36:52.280] He's going to try to hunker down and keep his low profile as possible,
[36:52.280 --> 36:55.280] and there's a good chance the judge will look at it and say,
[36:55.280 --> 37:00.280] you know, this guy's jumping up and down a railing in righteous indignation.
[37:00.280 --> 37:04.280] Maybe there's more going on here than I know about.
[37:04.280 --> 37:06.280] Yeah, I don't know.
[37:06.280 --> 37:14.280] You don't know how to read that judge, but I would be reluctant to poke the bearer too much
[37:14.280 --> 37:19.280] until you have some kind of a resolution.
[37:19.280 --> 37:24.280] And the fact that the prosecutor told you that you're not likely to get any time,
[37:24.280 --> 37:27.280] I wouldn't pay any attention to that.
[37:27.280 --> 37:28.280] That's just BS.
[37:28.280 --> 37:31.280] He's given you to try to get you to take a deal.
[37:31.280 --> 37:32.280] Right.
[37:32.280 --> 37:33.280] That's what I figured.
[37:33.280 --> 37:38.280] Like he said, freedom or liberty first.
[37:38.280 --> 37:47.280] I think this judge is more a stickler on the type of charge as opposed to maybe rule of law.
[37:47.280 --> 37:49.280] But I don't really know.
[37:49.280 --> 37:53.280] I mean, I guess so.
[37:53.280 --> 38:00.280] I've basically taken the chin from behind.
[38:00.280 --> 38:05.280] You get the best deal you can right now.
[38:05.280 --> 38:11.280] If you get a deal that's outrageous, you can challenge the deal.
[38:11.280 --> 38:15.280] You know, after the fact, you can challenge it.
[38:15.280 --> 38:19.280] But right now you don't know what's coming at you.
[38:19.280 --> 38:24.280] And this is hard because it's a crapshoot.
[38:24.280 --> 38:27.280] You don't know how to address this.
[38:27.280 --> 38:34.280] I get in these spots sometimes and they always terrify me.
[38:34.280 --> 38:36.280] In this case, it's easy for me.
[38:36.280 --> 38:43.280] When I was being prosecuted, it was pretty easy for me because I could make my own decisions.
[38:43.280 --> 38:45.280] Well, I said it was easy for me.
[38:45.280 --> 38:46.280] It wasn't.
[38:46.280 --> 38:47.280] It was a beast.
[38:47.280 --> 38:52.280] Here, I don't have a dog in this hunt, so I can sit back here and I can wax philosophical
[38:52.280 --> 38:54.280] if I want to.
[38:54.280 --> 39:01.280] But I've been where you are and not quite to the severity of yours.
[39:01.280 --> 39:10.280] But now I was looking at a year in jail and I fought on like a tiger and jury threw the book at me.
[39:10.280 --> 39:17.280] And then after they threw the book at me, I spent 27 days in solitary confinement.
[39:17.280 --> 39:26.280] Then I filed 35 criminal complaints against the judge, the prosecutor, the clerk, the district judge, everybody.
[39:26.280 --> 39:29.280] Two days later, I was out.
[39:29.280 --> 39:30.280] Oh, wow.
[39:30.280 --> 39:32.280] They said, get him.
[39:32.280 --> 39:39.280] The judge sent the prosecutor down and said, get him the heck out of here.
[39:39.280 --> 39:48.280] And I thought that, yeah, that thought that might be an option, you know, if I got anything.
[39:48.280 --> 39:49.280] If they...
[39:49.280 --> 39:52.280] Okay, you're in a difficult position.
[39:52.280 --> 39:57.280] There are those of us who can fight this battle.
[39:57.280 --> 40:01.280] Those are some people who are in a position to where they cannot.
[40:01.280 --> 40:05.280] Do not feel like you have to fight this battle.
[40:05.280 --> 40:17.280] If you don't get jail time and you get probation, they can suck up that probation on a whim.
[40:17.280 --> 40:23.280] So don't feel like you have to be a crusader for the right of things.
[40:23.280 --> 40:25.280] They got a bunch of us out here.
[40:25.280 --> 40:35.280] My job is to find people who can do this and give them the tools they need to do it with.
[40:35.280 --> 40:37.280] Brett, who was just on Before You, he's one of those.
[40:37.280 --> 40:41.280] Brett, had they been after him over license issue?
[40:41.280 --> 40:45.280] And when we first started talking, he was terrified.
[40:45.280 --> 40:49.280] But he did this anyway.
[40:49.280 --> 40:53.280] And, you know, I was in combat.
[40:53.280 --> 40:59.280] No, I was in combat with people who fought like crazy, but I didn't consider them brave.
[40:59.280 --> 41:02.280] I considered them insane.
[41:02.280 --> 41:11.280] The ones I considered brave were the ones that were terrified and did their job anyway.
[41:11.280 --> 41:17.280] Those guys, when things got tough, that's the guy you want to be around.
[41:17.280 --> 41:22.280] That's the guy who's going to get down to business.
[41:22.280 --> 41:25.280] And Brett's one of those guys, he was terrified.
[41:25.280 --> 41:29.280] He took them on anyway, but he wasn't looking at a long-term in prison.
[41:29.280 --> 41:34.280] He was looking at enough to ruin his life.
[41:34.280 --> 41:40.280] I guess when your life's going to be ruined, whether it's 20 years in prison or a year in prison
[41:40.280 --> 41:47.280] and your wife winds up divorcing you and taking the children, I don't know what sounds worse.
[41:47.280 --> 41:52.280] But to him, he was looking at losing everything, and he fought them anyway.
[41:52.280 --> 41:54.280] He fought them like a tiger.
[41:54.280 --> 41:58.280] And now he's getting good at it.
[41:58.280 --> 42:03.280] And he's beginning to see, you know, it takes a fight.
[42:03.280 --> 42:10.280] They come at you, and they come at you, and they come at you, and it seems like it's never going to end.
[42:10.280 --> 42:12.280] And we've got Tim on the line.
[42:12.280 --> 42:18.280] He's down a little lower, but him and his wife fought them and fought them and fought them,
[42:18.280 --> 42:21.280] and now we're getting ready to take them to the Court of Appeals.
[42:21.280 --> 42:27.280] And no matter what they did to him, he never backed up from them.
[42:27.280 --> 42:34.280] And after a while, when they don't wear you down and they count on wearing you down,
[42:34.280 --> 42:41.280] when they can't wear you down, then eventually the worm turns.
[42:41.280 --> 42:43.280] And it's beginning to turn.
[42:43.280 --> 42:45.280] In Tim's case, it's beginning to turn.
[42:45.280 --> 42:53.280] In Scott's case, he just had a judge over at least threaten him in court
[42:53.280 --> 42:57.280] because he filed criminal charges against the judge.
[42:57.280 --> 43:00.280] Holy mackerel.
[43:00.280 --> 43:04.280] Talk about doing something stupid.
[43:04.280 --> 43:07.280] I mean, generally you're in court and the judge threatens you.
[43:07.280 --> 43:09.280] You'd be terrified.
[43:09.280 --> 43:12.280] Brett was not.
[43:12.280 --> 43:18.280] He was thinking, oh my goodness, this judge just gave me a present.
[43:18.280 --> 43:20.280] Yeah.
[43:20.280 --> 43:27.280] So there are those of us who are in a position to where we can do that.
[43:27.280 --> 43:33.280] If you're not in a position to where you can do that, don't.
[43:33.280 --> 43:38.280] Don't throw yourself on the sword.
[43:38.280 --> 43:43.280] We've got enough of us out here who can go out and pick fights.
[43:43.280 --> 43:49.280] You know, I told who was it from South Carolina?
[43:49.280 --> 43:51.280] Jeff, I think it's from South Carolina.
[43:51.280 --> 43:56.280] Best fight to have is the one you pick.
[43:56.280 --> 43:58.280] Yeah.
[43:58.280 --> 44:00.280] Those are fun.
[44:00.280 --> 44:04.280] At Capital Corn and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[44:04.280 --> 44:08.280] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:08.280 --> 44:14.280] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[44:14.280 --> 44:18.280] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[44:18.280 --> 44:24.280] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal stealers and journalists.
[44:24.280 --> 44:27.280] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[44:27.280 --> 44:32.280] In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[44:32.280 --> 44:35.280] We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods,
[44:35.280 --> 44:39.280] Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[44:39.280 --> 44:43.280] We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept big coins as payment.
[44:43.280 --> 44:46.280] Call us at 512-646-644-0.
[44:46.280 --> 44:51.280] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[44:51.280 --> 44:54.280] We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[44:54.280 --> 45:00.280] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[45:00.280 --> 45:04.280] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.280 --> 45:07.280] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.280 --> 45:15.280] the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how, in 24 hours, you step by step.
[45:15.280 --> 45:19.280] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.280 --> 45:23.280] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.280 --> 45:28.280] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.280 --> 45:34.280] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.280 --> 45:39.280] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.280 --> 45:43.280] about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.280 --> 45:52.280] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.280 --> 46:01.280] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:23.280 --> 46:32.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Sean in Nebraska.
[46:32.280 --> 46:42.280] Sean, I would suggest you do nothing to poke this bearer until you have something definitive.
[46:42.280 --> 46:46.280] And don't feel bad about taking the deal.
[46:46.280 --> 46:51.280] Get the deal done and then talk to us.
[46:51.280 --> 46:53.280] Okay.
[46:53.280 --> 46:55.280] Okay, good luck, Sean.
[46:55.280 --> 46:56.280] Lock me up.
[46:56.280 --> 46:59.280] All right, thanks, Ray, and I appreciate it.
[46:59.280 --> 47:02.280] Okay, now we're going to Scott Michigan.
[47:02.280 --> 47:06.280] Hello, Scott.
[47:06.280 --> 47:08.280] Hello, Randy. How are you doing?
[47:08.280 --> 47:14.280] I'm doing good. Have you rewritten those bar grievances?
[47:14.280 --> 47:25.280] I'm reading the standards for the prosecutorial function right now. I just got that all printed out and I'm going over it to see how that will play in and how that will make it better.
[47:25.280 --> 47:29.280] Okay, Sean and I, Sean, you're not Sean.
[47:29.280 --> 47:39.280] Scott and I talked on, we did emails and he pointed out something that I absolutely should address.
[47:39.280 --> 47:46.280] While I say you can bar grieve a lawyer for anything, it doesn't matter. It hurts them.
[47:46.280 --> 47:53.280] I don't suggest that we file essentially frivolous, a lot of frivolous bar grievances.
[47:53.280 --> 48:03.280] That we always want to make our bar grievance sound as well-founded and substantial as we possibly can.
[48:03.280 --> 48:11.280] And with that said, yes, I did bar grieve a lawyer for part of his hair on the left.
[48:11.280 --> 48:13.280] I did do that.
[48:13.280 --> 48:19.280] And the lawyer said, what is going on? You bar grieve me for part of my hair on the left.
[48:19.280 --> 48:22.280] I said, yes, I did. Why did you do that?
[48:22.280 --> 48:26.280] I said, well, I didn't want to bar grieve you for what you had actually done.
[48:26.280 --> 48:32.280] I didn't want to get you disbarred.
[48:32.280 --> 48:46.280] Beyond that, aside from that, we want our bar grievances to sound as well-founded as possible so that we can take,
[48:46.280 --> 48:51.280] we can eventually, and this is something I want to get to, is take on the bar.
[48:51.280 --> 48:56.280] I think the state bar associations have lost their perspective.
[48:56.280 --> 49:02.280] They don't understand what is best for the lawyer community.
[49:02.280 --> 49:13.280] They've come to the conclusion that they are there to act as a public relations agency for lawyers.
[49:13.280 --> 49:21.280] That it's their purpose to protect the lawyers and make the lawyers look good and hide the bad guys.
[49:21.280 --> 49:29.280] And they seem not to understand how sophisticated the American public is.
[49:29.280 --> 49:33.280] Say, we know when we're hearing BS.
[49:33.280 --> 49:39.280] We hear so much BS. We're really good at recognizing BS.
[49:39.280 --> 49:52.280] If the bar association wants the American public to trust the lawyers, then the bar association has to beat up some of their lawyers.
[49:52.280 --> 50:07.280] They just have to, to give the impression to the public that the bar is actually keeping lawyers within the rules.
[50:07.280 --> 50:13.280] When the bar association protects the lawyers no matter what, nobody trusts them.
[50:13.280 --> 50:20.280] I read an article in the state bar journal for Texas for, I think it was 2016,
[50:20.280 --> 50:29.280] and they warned lawyers that 25% of all cases are now being adjudicated per se,
[50:29.280 --> 50:35.280] because the public does not trust the legal profession.
[50:35.280 --> 50:39.280] And that lack of trust is well founded.
[50:39.280 --> 50:46.280] And it's there because the bar has not done its job.
[50:46.280 --> 50:51.280] So we want to find grievances that when they blow off the grievance,
[50:51.280 --> 50:58.280] we can hold this up and say, this is the foundation for the grievance.
[50:58.280 --> 51:02.280] And this is how the bar just ignored it.
[51:02.280 --> 51:12.280] So that we can make, so we can demonstrate that they are acting outside the scope of their charter.
[51:12.280 --> 51:18.280] Okay. So it's not just about getting the insurance carriers riled up and all other stuff.
[51:18.280 --> 51:21.280] There is like a greater purpose to it.
[51:21.280 --> 51:25.280] Exactly. We want to look credible.
[51:25.280 --> 51:26.280] Okay.
[51:26.280 --> 51:33.280] And the thing about these guys, you're reading the bar association standards for the prosecution function.
[51:33.280 --> 51:40.280] Tell me, did that read like a comic book or what?
[51:40.280 --> 51:47.280] Yeah, you read these things and you laugh just like Scott just laughed.
[51:47.280 --> 51:50.280] Oh man, I can hammer him for this and I can hammer him for that.
[51:50.280 --> 51:54.280] There is so much you can hammer these guys for.
[51:54.280 --> 51:58.280] So read the standards and read like a comic book.
[51:58.280 --> 51:59.280] For sure.
[51:59.280 --> 52:01.280] Go ahead. You've been reading it.
[52:01.280 --> 52:03.280] What did you find?
[52:03.280 --> 52:08.280] Well, actually, I picked up something in a call that you had said earlier about, you know,
[52:08.280 --> 52:13.280] just getting them to screw up right out of the gate, so to speak.
[52:13.280 --> 52:15.280] And there's definitely plenty in here.
[52:15.280 --> 52:17.280] I mean, I have to go through it some more.
[52:17.280 --> 52:19.280] I just printed it out and just glanced at it.
[52:19.280 --> 52:23.280] But there's definitely...
[52:23.280 --> 52:25.280] I'm telling you, you read that thing.
[52:25.280 --> 52:31.280] You will not believe all of the things you can grieve them for.
[52:31.280 --> 52:44.280] Now, what the bar generally says, I don't know what it says in Michigan, but in Texas they say they do not want you citing canons of the bar association standards.
[52:44.280 --> 52:47.280] They don't want you citing case law.
[52:47.280 --> 52:49.280] Okay, no problem.
[52:49.280 --> 53:02.280] I read the standard and then I craft my grievance in the verbiage of the standard.
[53:02.280 --> 53:07.280] The one that I have memorized is 3-3.11.
[53:07.280 --> 53:11.280] It is...
[53:11.280 --> 53:14.280] What's the term?
[53:14.280 --> 53:24.280] Anyway, it's improper for a prosecuting attorney, it is unethical conduct for a prosecuting attorney to refrain from pursuing evidence,
[53:24.280 --> 53:31.280] solely because the evidence will show the innocence of the accused or mitigate the guilt of the accused.
[53:31.280 --> 53:45.280] The lawyer, the prosecutor in this case, refrain from pursuing evidence, solely because that evidence would have shown my innocence or mitigated my guilt in the instant action.
[53:45.280 --> 53:50.280] I mean, there's no question that that happened in my most recent visit.
[53:50.280 --> 54:03.280] And something you said in another call that really struck a chord with me, too, was that you can take your recording which you turned into a transcript and just attach that as an affidavit to your bar agreement.
[54:03.280 --> 54:04.280] Is that what you said?
[54:04.280 --> 54:08.280] Absolutely, but never mention the recording.
[54:08.280 --> 54:09.280] No, no, no, no.
[54:09.280 --> 54:14.280] And that's another great tip, which is just, oh, no, I had a transcription.
[54:14.280 --> 54:17.280] I mean, try and prove that you didn't, right?
[54:17.280 --> 54:23.280] Yeah, because they're going to read the transcript and they're going to say, hey, I've made this stuff up.
[54:23.280 --> 54:25.280] And they're going to deny all of it.
[54:25.280 --> 54:36.280] They're going to make, they're going to make statements to the contrary and start you with aggravated perjury.
[54:36.280 --> 54:40.280] So every, you know, this is chess.
[54:40.280 --> 54:41.280] It's not checkers.
[54:41.280 --> 54:53.280] And attaching that transcription as an affidavit, does that also open the door to the attorney grievance commission to say also, you know, here's the transcript.
[54:53.280 --> 54:59.280] Make of this what you will in terms of, you know, getting that extra.
[54:59.280 --> 55:04.280] The transcript amounts to a statement of facts.
[55:04.280 --> 55:05.280] Okay, yep.
[55:05.280 --> 55:10.280] You allege these facts in the transcript.
[55:10.280 --> 55:15.280] The lawyer has to rebut those facts.
[55:15.280 --> 55:23.280] When you're alleged facts from the transcript or a transcript from there are not just an avid.
[55:23.280 --> 55:28.280] See that you file it as an affidavit, not as a transcript.
[55:28.280 --> 55:29.280] Right.
[55:29.280 --> 55:30.280] I'm sorry.
[55:30.280 --> 55:33.280] I didn't think to say that.
[55:33.280 --> 55:36.280] You take the transcript and file it as an affidavit.
[55:36.280 --> 55:40.280] You're saying this is what was said.
[55:40.280 --> 55:41.280] Okay.
[55:41.280 --> 55:44.280] And say, no, that wasn't what was said.
[55:44.280 --> 55:47.280] This was said.
[55:47.280 --> 55:55.280] Now you bring back the recording and show that they committed aggravated perjury.
[55:55.280 --> 56:05.280] Now they may have genuinely thought something else was said because they're not listening to the recording.
[56:05.280 --> 56:07.280] Sorry, Bubba.
[56:07.280 --> 56:09.280] Life is tough.
[56:09.280 --> 56:13.280] I went into court recently in Texas.
[56:13.280 --> 56:15.280] And this is a judge that knows me.
[56:15.280 --> 56:17.280] I've hammered her a timer.
[56:17.280 --> 56:19.280] She's a JP judge.
[56:19.280 --> 56:23.280] And I've got my phone out here on the table.
[56:23.280 --> 56:26.280] And she said, we need to turn all those phones off.
[56:26.280 --> 56:30.280] I said, oh, no, no judge, but I wanted to use my phone to record this.
[56:30.280 --> 56:40.280] And that's because we have a recent ruling by the Fifth Circuit under, oh, I think her name is second.
[56:40.280 --> 56:42.280] Turn a driver.
[56:42.280 --> 56:45.280] This says he can record.
[56:45.280 --> 56:49.280] So I'm trying to get her to tell me I can't record.
[56:49.280 --> 56:51.280] And she says, you're going to have to turn that off.
[56:51.280 --> 56:54.280] Mr. Bailiff, take that phone from Mr. Kelston.
[56:54.280 --> 57:02.280] And I turn it off and Bailiff comes over and he jumps out of my hand and I'm sitting here greeting at the judge.
[57:02.280 --> 57:06.280] And the judge looks down at me.
[57:06.280 --> 57:14.280] Mr. Kelston, do you have any other object on your person capable of recording these proceedings?
[57:14.280 --> 57:21.280] Oh, judge, I was hoping you wouldn't ask me that.
[57:21.280 --> 57:31.280] I was playing tag with a zip drive stuck to it with Felcor and I pulled it off and I turned off the little switch
[57:31.280 --> 57:35.280] and I held it out and Bailiff jerks it out of my hand.
[57:35.280 --> 57:39.280] And I'm sitting here looking at the judge real innocent.
[57:39.280 --> 57:44.280] Mr. Kelston, do you have anything else that can record?
[57:44.280 --> 57:49.280] Oh, no, judge, you're reaching my pocket.
[57:49.280 --> 57:54.280] Oh, another one. She was furious.
[57:54.280 --> 58:00.280] But I'm going to charge her with a facial oppression.
[58:00.280 --> 58:04.280] Oh, that was so much fun.
[58:04.280 --> 58:06.280] Anyway, that's kind of a point.
[58:06.280 --> 58:10.280] Do you have more callers or can we talk some more after the break?
[58:10.280 --> 58:13.280] We've got more callers, but we've got more time.
[58:13.280 --> 58:19.280] My clock doesn't refresh itself automatically.
[58:19.280 --> 58:21.280] Okay, we've got another hour.
[58:21.280 --> 58:24.280] We've got two callers about Tim and Tina.
[58:24.280 --> 58:30.280] A little while on the next, on the other side of the break, and then I need to go to Tim and Tina.
[58:30.280 --> 58:32.280] Tim and Tina's been calling.
[58:32.280 --> 58:34.280] I really need to get to her.
[58:34.280 --> 58:40.280] Randy Kelston, real-law radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[58:40.280 --> 58:45.280] I don't know how fast Tim and Tina will be, but if they're real quick, we might get somebody else.
[58:45.280 --> 59:13.280] We'll be right back.
[59:15.280 --> 59:22.280] We'll be right back.
[59:45.280 --> 59:59.280] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at www.logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:15.280 --> 01:00:23.280] Into the Tides of the Alternative.
[01:00:46.280 --> 01:01:02.280] Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968,
[01:01:02.280 --> 01:01:08.280] which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:01:08.280 --> 01:01:14.280] It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in public schools,
[01:01:14.280 --> 01:01:18.280] and employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:01:18.280 --> 01:01:23.280] Today in History.
[01:01:23.280 --> 01:01:30.280] In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack on civilians in the city of Douma,
[01:01:30.280 --> 01:01:35.280] which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria,
[01:01:35.280 --> 01:01:39.280] Bashar al-Assad, by the United States, and on Israel by Russia,
[01:01:39.280 --> 01:01:43.280] either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as of yet.
[01:01:43.280 --> 01:01:48.280] President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday, that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria,
[01:01:48.280 --> 01:01:52.280] get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new and smart.
[01:01:52.280 --> 01:01:58.280] Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:01:58.280 --> 01:02:06.280] Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[01:02:06.280 --> 01:02:15.280] Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[01:02:15.280 --> 01:02:20.280] Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil war,
[01:02:20.280 --> 01:02:27.280] a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments,
[01:02:27.280 --> 01:02:32.280] with ISIS being one of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:32.280 --> 01:02:40.280] No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakova posted on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists
[01:02:40.280 --> 01:02:44.280] and not at a legitimate government, which has been fighting terrorists.
[01:02:44.280 --> 01:02:51.280] Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:02:51.280 --> 01:03:03.280] This was Frick Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:21.280 --> 01:03:29.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio on this Friday, the seventh day of September, 2018.
[01:03:29.280 --> 01:03:34.280] We're talking to Scott in Michigan.
[01:03:34.280 --> 01:03:41.280] Okay, Scott, I was having too much fun with picking on Judge Murrow in Wise County.
[01:03:41.280 --> 01:03:43.280] Where were we?
[01:03:43.280 --> 01:03:53.280] Well, the more I listen to hearing about what other people are doing or what other people are having for recourse, especially when you talk a lot about grand juries.
[01:03:53.280 --> 01:04:04.280] And Michigan doesn't have a grand jury system per se, but the way I understand it, they have called some grand juries in Detroit to fight corruption.
[01:04:04.280 --> 01:04:13.280] So I was just thinking that as another recourse, you could always send charges to the grand jury in Detroit and see what they make of them.
[01:04:13.280 --> 01:04:18.280] Well, okay, let me talk about Pennsylvania.
[01:04:18.280 --> 01:04:27.280] Pennsylvania is the most unique as I've come across concerning grand juries.
[01:04:27.280 --> 01:04:35.280] In most of the states, we have a duty to report crime.
[01:04:35.280 --> 01:04:49.280] But you and I as citizens, since 1865 when, or right around that date, when the states adopted professional prosecutors.
[01:04:49.280 --> 01:05:04.280] Before that time, if you had knowledge, if you were harmed by a crime, you would hire an attorney and the attorney would bring a criminal complaint to the court against the person who harmed you.
[01:05:04.280 --> 01:05:23.280] Well, 1865 or right around there, the states adopted professional prosecutors and prosecution of criminal acts became the sole purview of state prosecuting attorneys.
[01:05:23.280 --> 01:05:39.280] So after that, a private citizen had a duty to report crime. But once they reported crime, they had no standing in the enforcement of the law.
[01:05:39.280 --> 01:05:43.280] That was prosecutor's job.
[01:05:43.280 --> 01:05:47.280] Pennsylvania is different.
[01:05:47.280 --> 01:05:58.280] I'm sorry, one other thing I needed to say. Once the crime has been reported, whether or not the crime is prosecuted is not your business.
[01:05:58.280 --> 01:06:01.280] You have no standing.
[01:06:01.280 --> 01:06:11.280] It is the prosecutor who makes the determination as to whether or not the crime is prosecuted.
[01:06:11.280 --> 01:06:19.280] The challenge that the prosecutor's determination actually is supposed to be done by a magistrate who does an examining trial.
[01:06:19.280 --> 01:06:26.280] But at the end of the day, it's actually the prosecutor. In Pennsylvania, they're different.
[01:06:26.280 --> 01:06:34.280] You don't have access to a grand jury. And what you spoke about in Michigan sounds like Pennsylvania.
[01:06:34.280 --> 01:06:42.280] A district judge can impanel a grand jury and present criminal complaints to the grand jury.
[01:06:42.280 --> 01:06:55.280] But only the district judge can do that. A private citizen cannot address a grand jury directly without going through with the district judge.
[01:06:55.280 --> 01:07:08.280] With that limitation, that limitation is offset by the fact that in Pennsylvania, the person filing the complaint has standing.
[01:07:08.280 --> 01:07:13.280] The person filing a criminal complaint in Pennsylvania is required to file a complaint with a prosecuting attorney.
[01:07:13.280 --> 01:07:17.280] The prosecuting attorney has first blush.
[01:07:17.280 --> 01:07:32.280] The prosecuting attorney can make a determination as to whether or not he believes there's sufficient evidence to believe that a crime has been committed and that the named person in the form of the accused has committed that crime.
[01:07:32.280 --> 01:07:37.280] They have discretion to make that determination.
[01:07:37.280 --> 01:07:42.280] What they don't have is judicial caprice.
[01:07:42.280 --> 01:07:56.280] They cannot decide who they want to prosecute and who they don't. And to avoid that eventuality, a filer of a complaint in Pennsylvania has standing.
[01:07:56.280 --> 01:08:09.280] If the prosecutor elects not to prosecute, then a citizen in the state of Pennsylvania can file an appeal to the court of common police.
[01:08:09.280 --> 01:08:20.280] And if the court of common police refuses to prosecute, the filer can appeal that issue all the way up to the Pennsylvania Supreme.
[01:08:20.280 --> 01:08:38.280] If you are in Michigan and you do not have access to a grand jury, there must be something in place to allow you to secure remedy.
[01:08:38.280 --> 01:08:42.280] You need to look at the law and find out what it is.
[01:08:42.280 --> 01:08:49.280] Grand juries were an absolutely critical part of our system.
[01:08:49.280 --> 01:08:55.280] A grand jury has only one purpose. It's not to indict people.
[01:08:55.280 --> 01:09:04.280] It is to protect the public from an overzealous prosecuting attorney.
[01:09:04.280 --> 01:09:07.280] That's what they were put there for.
[01:09:07.280 --> 01:09:12.280] So it sounds like in Michigan that you don't have access to a grand jury.
[01:09:12.280 --> 01:09:21.280] So Scott, do you have any idea what other options you have in Michigan?
[01:09:21.280 --> 01:09:24.280] Well, yeah, I think there aren't a lot of options in Michigan.
[01:09:24.280 --> 01:09:34.280] And that's why it's described as one of the more corrupt states, because there's no grand juries. There's no examining trials.
[01:09:34.280 --> 01:09:40.280] There's just very thin kind of preliminary hearing for felonies, and that's about it.
[01:09:40.280 --> 01:09:46.280] Okay, preliminary hearing is the standard term for examining trial.
[01:09:46.280 --> 01:09:51.280] That is, should be a examining trial.
[01:09:51.280 --> 01:09:53.280] They may or may not be.
[01:09:53.280 --> 01:09:58.280] And if that's it, then that is a problem.
[01:09:58.280 --> 01:10:00.280] It is.
[01:10:00.280 --> 01:10:03.280] Michigan should understand that that's a problem.
[01:10:03.280 --> 01:10:10.280] You know, in most of the states, we have a set of effective checks and balances.
[01:10:10.280 --> 01:10:15.280] These checks and balances have been put in place by politicians.
[01:10:15.280 --> 01:10:19.280] And we all know how corrupt politicians are.
[01:10:19.280 --> 01:10:27.280] So it kind of begs the question, why would we have all of these protections against corruption?
[01:10:27.280 --> 01:10:37.280] When the guys who filed these, who voted for this legislation were corrupt?
[01:10:37.280 --> 01:10:44.280] Well, they're corrupt, and they know that everybody else is corrupt.
[01:10:44.280 --> 01:10:53.280] They understand it better than we do, and they need ways to protect themselves from the other corrupt politicians.
[01:10:53.280 --> 01:11:00.280] So they put these remedies in place to protect themselves from other guys just like themselves.
[01:11:00.280 --> 01:11:07.280] They know what scoundrels they are, and they know there's a lot of others just like them out there, and they need protection from them.
[01:11:07.280 --> 01:11:11.280] And we as citizens get to use those protections.
[01:11:11.280 --> 01:11:22.280] It is incongruous to think that Michigan doesn't have some remedy. We just haven't found it.
[01:11:22.280 --> 01:11:32.280] Perhaps, but I've also read reports that say that, you know, why Michigan is so corrupt is because it lacks the structures that other states have.
[01:11:32.280 --> 01:11:38.280] You may have to take the Michigan Actors to the set.
[01:11:38.280 --> 01:11:47.280] Okay, because I did a ton of research trying to figure out the grand jury thing, the examining child thing, and I just kept trying to find that information about Michigan.
[01:11:47.280 --> 01:11:53.280] What I found was people saying, well, why you're not finding this information is because Michigan is a corrupt state.
[01:11:53.280 --> 01:12:00.280] It's one of the, you know, more corrupt states because of the structures that it has or doesn't have.
[01:12:00.280 --> 01:12:05.280] Lack of checks and balances. You might have to pull those out to the set.
[01:12:05.280 --> 01:12:20.280] But you can do that as an individual because any act by the state that has the effect of denying you in the full and free access to or enjoyment of a right is a violation of due process.
[01:12:20.280 --> 01:12:29.280] And due process is guaranteed by the federal constitution, so that brings it out to the fit.
[01:12:29.280 --> 01:12:46.280] So you might be better off in Michigan to craft your complaints in a way that take you to primarily procedural due process, which will bring you into the federal courts.
[01:12:46.280 --> 01:12:48.280] Okay.
[01:12:48.280 --> 01:13:02.280] So you might look at that, look up federal procedural due process and due process, due process violation. For due process violations, you do not have to show harm.
[01:13:02.280 --> 01:13:06.280] The violation of due process is harm per se.
[01:13:06.280 --> 01:13:14.280] It's harm because it violated the canons or covenants of the federal constitution.
[01:13:14.280 --> 01:13:16.280] Right.
[01:13:16.280 --> 01:13:23.280] So look up that, look for a way to bring these guys out of the state into the fed.
[01:13:23.280 --> 01:13:27.280] Doesn't your element of habeas corpus also walk through due process?
[01:13:27.280 --> 01:13:38.280] Yes, it does. And primarily the habeas corpus walks down federal due process. It includes state law because it was written for Texas.
[01:13:38.280 --> 01:13:45.280] But it's all, the underlying procedures are all based on federal law.
[01:13:45.280 --> 01:13:47.280] Okay.
[01:13:47.280 --> 01:14:01.280] So go through that a couple of times and then look at the codes and statutes and case law I use for Texas and see if you can find some Michigan representative cases.
[01:14:01.280 --> 01:14:16.280] The way I do that is I put, we have one case, Boyd v. State. It's a 1921 case. It's Texas case. I would put Boyd v. State space Michigan.
[01:14:16.280 --> 01:14:34.280] So you look for a Michigan statute that speaks to Boyd v. State as a, not a controlling case, but as an informative case.
[01:14:34.280 --> 01:14:46.280] And that will get you a circumstances close to what Boyd v. State addresses. And Boyd v. State addresses taking a person directly to a magistrate once they're arrested.
[01:14:46.280 --> 01:14:59.280] I have a number of these that are Texas state statutes because it was filed in Texas, but almost all of the Texas cases can be replaced by cases from other states.
[01:14:59.280 --> 01:15:02.280] Okay.
[01:15:02.280 --> 01:15:05.280] Okay. Have any other questions?
[01:15:05.280 --> 01:15:13.280] One more thing. Yeah. Being that I'm not from Texas, sometimes the, sometimes the phrases aren't familiar to me.
[01:15:13.280 --> 01:15:19.280] I wonder if you could say a word or two about how the cow ate the cabbage because I don't know what that means.
[01:15:19.280 --> 01:15:23.280] Okay. So you don't speak redneck.
[01:15:23.280 --> 01:15:28.280] Okay. I am, I happen to be multilingual.
[01:15:28.280 --> 01:15:34.280] I speak Yankee. I speak Hillbilly. And I speak redneck.
[01:15:34.280 --> 01:15:46.280] We have some interesting sayings down here. I have a friend in upstate New York, Pastor Massad. I do a show on his network every Monday.
[01:15:46.280 --> 01:15:51.280] And Pastor Massad thinks highly of me.
[01:15:51.280 --> 01:16:03.280] He said, you know, I was looking at your website the other day, Mr. Kelton, and you have a face made for radio.
[01:16:03.280 --> 01:16:14.280] But then again, he's in upstate New York and every time it's 22 below zero, I call him and say, Pastor Massad, I was out mowing the yard this morning and I thought of you.
[01:16:14.280 --> 01:16:23.280] And he always says the same thing. That's why nobody likes you.
[01:16:23.280 --> 01:16:30.280] But I forgot why I went to the pastor.
[01:16:30.280 --> 01:16:33.280] Why did I go to the pastor?
[01:16:33.280 --> 01:16:35.280] To call with the cabbage.
[01:16:35.280 --> 01:16:41.280] To have with the cabbage. Oh yeah, he really likes these sayings that we have.
[01:16:41.280 --> 01:16:50.280] We have a bunch of them and then we have a colleague, Scott, that does a spot on, Scott Richardson does a spot on the pastor show.
[01:16:50.280 --> 01:16:56.280] I do a one hour on Monday nights on Truth Radio Network with the pastor.
[01:16:56.280 --> 01:17:03.280] And Scott's on there and he's always coming up with these sayings.
[01:17:03.280 --> 01:17:11.280] It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:17:11.280 --> 01:17:18.280] Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:18.280 --> 01:17:25.280] From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR 15.
[01:17:25.280 --> 01:17:28.280] More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:28.280 --> 01:17:34.280] When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:34.280 --> 01:17:38.280] Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:38.280 --> 01:17:43.280] And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:43.280 --> 01:17:52.280] If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:17:52.280 --> 01:17:55.280] We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.280 --> 01:18:00.280] Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.280 --> 01:18:05.280] I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:05.280 --> 01:18:09.280] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[01:18:09.280 --> 01:18:13.280] I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.280 --> 01:18:20.280] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.280 --> 01:18:22.280] How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.280 --> 01:18:29.280] Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.280 --> 01:18:34.280] First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[01:18:34.280 --> 01:18:37.280] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.280 --> 01:18:43.280] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.280 --> 01:18:44.280] Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.280 --> 01:18:45.280] No.
[01:18:45.280 --> 01:18:47.280] Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.280 --> 01:18:48.280] No.
[01:18:48.280 --> 01:18:49.280] Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:18:49.280 --> 01:18:50.280] No.
[01:18:50.280 --> 01:18:51.280] I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.280 --> 01:18:57.280] Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.280 --> 01:18:58.280] We are Logos.
[01:18:58.280 --> 01:19:26.280] Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:26.280 --> 01:19:36.280] Okay, we are back and we were talking about how the cow ate the cabbage.
[01:19:36.280 --> 01:19:37.280] That's right.
[01:19:37.280 --> 01:19:47.280] This is how it works. You may not like the way it works. You may wish it worked another way, but this is how it works.
[01:19:47.280 --> 01:19:53.280] That's what cow ate the cabbage means.
[01:19:53.280 --> 01:19:58.280] Do you have any other euphemisms you'd like interpreted?
[01:19:58.280 --> 01:20:05.280] I'll have to process that a little bit. It means what it means, right?
[01:20:05.280 --> 01:20:07.280] We have lots of them.
[01:20:07.280 --> 01:20:12.280] Did you get a chance to check out Badass Motor Scooter on YouTube?
[01:20:12.280 --> 01:20:14.280] Wait, say that again?
[01:20:14.280 --> 01:20:18.280] I sent you a link to a short YouTube video.
[01:20:18.280 --> 01:20:20.280] No, I didn't see that yet.
[01:20:20.280 --> 01:20:24.280] Okay, well, my channel is called Badass Motor Scooter. I knew you wouldn't mind.
[01:20:24.280 --> 01:20:29.280] Okay.
[01:20:29.280 --> 01:20:33.280] I'll let you get going to your other callers. We'll catch you on the e-mail this week.
[01:20:33.280 --> 01:20:38.280] Okay, thank you, Scott. Okay, now we're going to Tina in California.
[01:20:38.280 --> 01:20:40.280] Hello, Tina.
[01:20:40.280 --> 01:20:41.280] Hello.
[01:20:41.280 --> 01:20:46.280] Sorry for missing you yesterday. What do you have for us?
[01:20:46.280 --> 01:20:51.280] Okay. Well, we wanted to finish off yesterday, but there was more to do.
[01:20:51.280 --> 01:20:58.280] No, Tina, you've got a ringing. Are you on a hands-free phone or Bluetooth?
[01:20:58.280 --> 01:21:05.280] Yeah, let me get off the Bluetooth somehow. Let me find out how to do that.
[01:21:05.280 --> 01:21:08.280] I know I can get it off here.
[01:21:08.280 --> 01:21:12.280] If you just sort it down and step on it, it'll probably turn off.
[01:21:12.280 --> 01:21:15.280] There you go.
[01:21:15.280 --> 01:21:18.280] Maybe there's another method.
[01:21:18.280 --> 01:21:20.280] No, is that better?
[01:21:20.280 --> 01:21:24.280] That is much better.
[01:21:24.280 --> 01:21:31.280] Okay, let me put the Bluetooth in the other room and shut the door so it doesn't connect itself.
[01:21:31.280 --> 01:21:39.280] You were talking earlier about with one of the gentlemen about the judge who threatened him,
[01:21:39.280 --> 01:21:47.280] and then there was something said about, you know, all those other complaints, you know, they didn't go anywhere.
[01:21:47.280 --> 01:21:56.280] Well, I had the attorney for the bank, you know, I complained about him, and of course the state bar did nothing.
[01:21:56.280 --> 01:22:02.280] And I'm working on going to the Supreme Court, the California Supreme Court with that complaint.
[01:22:02.280 --> 01:22:14.280] But he actually said to me in a conversation, because I'd finally told my former attorney that he could not talk to him anymore without me being on the phone.
[01:22:14.280 --> 01:22:19.280] I told him this before, and he didn't do it, and I said, no call.
[01:22:19.280 --> 01:22:27.280] So we get on this call, and the attorney said, well, this call cannot be recorded.
[01:22:27.280 --> 01:22:32.280] And I'm not talking with her because she always records calls.
[01:22:32.280 --> 01:22:34.280] And I said, what are you accusing me of?
[01:22:34.280 --> 01:22:39.280] I said, you're accusing me of recording a call without any proof?
[01:22:39.280 --> 01:22:42.280] And he said, I'm not talking about this.
[01:22:42.280 --> 01:22:45.280] And I said, well, we'll see about that.
[01:22:45.280 --> 01:22:50.280] I said, you know, I have, you know, remedies for that.
[01:22:50.280 --> 01:22:52.280] He said, oh, so you're going to make another complaint?
[01:22:52.280 --> 01:22:55.280] We'll see what happens to your other complaint.
[01:22:55.280 --> 01:23:00.280] And, you know, so see where this one will go.
[01:23:00.280 --> 01:23:01.280] Oh, good.
[01:23:01.280 --> 01:23:04.280] You should file a complaint for that.
[01:23:04.280 --> 01:23:07.280] So I should include that in the complaint.
[01:23:07.280 --> 01:23:08.280] Oh, absolutely.
[01:23:08.280 --> 01:23:12.280] He's forbidden to mention that.
[01:23:12.280 --> 01:23:13.280] Uh-huh.
[01:23:13.280 --> 01:23:21.280] And the fact that he did mention it, that tells you that it caused him a problem.
[01:23:21.280 --> 01:23:26.280] If it hadn't caused him a problem, he wouldn't have mentioned it.
[01:23:26.280 --> 01:23:27.280] Uh-huh.
[01:23:27.280 --> 01:23:30.280] But obviously he knew it wasn't going to go anywhere.
[01:23:30.280 --> 01:23:33.280] Lawyers are not smart for the most part.
[01:23:33.280 --> 01:23:42.280] You know, I've heard about lawyers that lawyers make terrible witnesses.
[01:23:42.280 --> 01:23:46.280] They get witnesses on the stand and they know how to manipulate a witness.
[01:23:46.280 --> 01:23:53.280] They think that a lawyer would know what to watch for, but they don't.
[01:23:53.280 --> 01:23:56.280] You file a grievance against a lawyer.
[01:23:56.280 --> 01:24:03.280] The best thing the lawyer can do is pretend like you didn't file the grievance.
[01:24:03.280 --> 01:24:04.280] Uh-huh.
[01:24:04.280 --> 01:24:10.280] To say anything about it means that he blinked.
[01:24:10.280 --> 01:24:15.280] He's letting it leak out that the grievance hurt him.
[01:24:15.280 --> 01:24:23.280] And that's what Brett got earlier about the judge addressing the criminal complaints he
[01:24:23.280 --> 01:24:26.280] filed against him, acting like it didn't matter.
[01:24:26.280 --> 01:24:29.280] Yeah, sure it didn't, Bubba.
[01:24:29.280 --> 01:24:36.280] This lawyer wouldn't have mentioned that complaint if it hadn't stung him.
[01:24:36.280 --> 01:24:38.280] So five other ones.
[01:24:38.280 --> 01:24:46.280] One complaint, and this was when it turned out that the judge said he recently found
[01:24:46.280 --> 01:24:52.280] out, this was before my case was finished, that he found out that his daughter was babysitting
[01:24:52.280 --> 01:24:56.280] for the opposing side's attorney's young son.
[01:24:56.280 --> 01:25:00.280] This is in a city of like hundreds of thousands of people.
[01:25:00.280 --> 01:25:08.280] He has to hire the judge's daughter, who is against me, and he's in the law firm of
[01:25:08.280 --> 01:25:11.280] over 200 people, and he can't find another babysitter.
[01:25:11.280 --> 01:25:20.280] It's just such a violation of ethics that would lead a reasonable person to suspect
[01:25:20.280 --> 01:25:22.280] that I would not have got a fair trial.
[01:25:22.280 --> 01:25:24.280] Exactly.
[01:25:24.280 --> 01:25:31.280] And at the end of the day, it goes to a reasonable person, a reasonable person.
[01:25:31.280 --> 01:25:34.280] What was the term?
[01:25:34.280 --> 01:25:41.280] Perspective, but what would a reasonable person of ordinary prudence think?
[01:25:41.280 --> 01:25:42.280] I'm losing the correct term.
[01:25:42.280 --> 01:25:46.280] There's a term for that, the reasonable person.
[01:25:46.280 --> 01:25:48.280] Anyway.
[01:25:48.280 --> 01:25:54.280] Everyone I've spoken to can't believe that it happened and that the judge did not recuse
[01:25:54.280 --> 01:25:55.280] himself.
[01:25:55.280 --> 01:25:59.280] And I spoke with another attorney about it later, and he said your attorney didn't
[01:25:59.280 --> 01:26:01.280] immediately ask for his recusal.
[01:26:01.280 --> 01:26:06.280] I mean, literally, as soon as he heard the story, he said he should have asked for his
[01:26:06.280 --> 01:26:07.280] recusal.
[01:26:07.280 --> 01:26:11.280] Did you file a judicial complaint against the judge?
[01:26:11.280 --> 01:26:12.280] Yes, I did.
[01:26:12.280 --> 01:26:13.280] Good.
[01:26:13.280 --> 01:26:17.280] And the judicial commission said we're not going to do anything.
[01:26:17.280 --> 01:26:19.280] That's okay.
[01:26:19.280 --> 01:26:27.280] Because it's stung his bond.
[01:26:27.280 --> 01:26:36.280] Judges, I'm sorry about my mic, judges insurance is a bond that the state maintains.
[01:26:36.280 --> 01:26:43.280] And judicial conduct complies against the judge, affect the judge's bond rating.
[01:26:43.280 --> 01:26:50.280] If his rating gets too high, he can't be covered by the bond.
[01:26:50.280 --> 01:26:53.280] That's the only way I've ever heard of getting rid of a federal judge.
[01:26:53.280 --> 01:26:57.280] If you can push his bond rating too high, then he has to step down from the bench
[01:26:57.280 --> 01:27:01.280] or pay his own insurance.
[01:27:01.280 --> 01:27:02.280] Okay.
[01:27:02.280 --> 01:27:03.280] So it hurts.
[01:27:03.280 --> 01:27:07.280] I'm taking that one further to the Supreme Court because if the judicial commission isn't
[01:27:07.280 --> 01:27:13.280] going to do their job, and there is a huge amount of essential articles of corruption
[01:27:13.280 --> 01:27:20.280] right at the Supreme Court level in California, that attorney was writing about it.
[01:27:20.280 --> 01:27:25.280] But I'm going to take it further, and I know they're not going to do anything.
[01:27:25.280 --> 01:27:31.280] So is it after I ask the Supreme Court to do something that the California Supreme Court,
[01:27:31.280 --> 01:27:36.280] is it then that I ask the attorney general, or do I go straight and say,
[01:27:36.280 --> 01:27:40.280] I would like this put before Zika and George?
[01:27:40.280 --> 01:27:41.280] Yeah.
[01:27:41.280 --> 01:27:46.280] If you can't get the state to do anything, then the next place is the fed.
[01:27:46.280 --> 01:27:52.280] If the judge and the prosecutor by their, or judge and opposing counsel by their behavior
[01:27:52.280 --> 01:27:57.280] denied you and due process, you can take them to the fed.
[01:27:57.280 --> 01:28:04.280] And you take them to the fed, they don't feel like they're protected there.
[01:28:04.280 --> 01:28:08.280] They feel protected in the state, but not in the federal.
[01:28:08.280 --> 01:28:11.280] Where do you take it in the federal?
[01:28:11.280 --> 01:28:15.280] You file suit for due process violation.
[01:28:15.280 --> 01:28:16.280] Okay.
[01:28:16.280 --> 01:28:18.280] File suit for due process violation.
[01:28:18.280 --> 01:28:19.280] Okay.
[01:28:19.280 --> 01:28:23.280] Procedural due process is the best one.
[01:28:23.280 --> 01:28:30.280] And you maintain that the judge and the prosecutor and opposing counsel had an inappropriate
[01:28:30.280 --> 01:28:37.280] relationship, and that inappropriate relationship denied you in procedure and due process.
[01:28:37.280 --> 01:28:38.280] Okay.
[01:28:38.280 --> 01:28:50.280] And it's not what keeps you in the federal court is not what you can prove, but in the nature
[01:28:50.280 --> 01:28:52.280] of your claim.
[01:28:52.280 --> 01:29:00.280] So you have to make the claim in a way such that if everything you claimed was true,
[01:29:00.280 --> 01:29:04.280] then you would have a federal claim.
[01:29:04.280 --> 01:29:08.280] That keeps you in the federal court.
[01:29:08.280 --> 01:29:14.280] Do you put everything in there even though against the attorney, I filed two different
[01:29:14.280 --> 01:29:18.280] complaints and I've got another one to go where he coerced.
[01:29:18.280 --> 01:29:25.280] So I did the one where he coerced two public officials to break the law when he said the
[01:29:25.280 --> 01:29:29.280] notaries could not send me their notary ledger.
[01:29:29.280 --> 01:29:32.280] I submitted that one.
[01:29:32.280 --> 01:29:35.280] That is procedural due process.
[01:29:35.280 --> 01:29:37.280] That's procedural due process.
[01:29:37.280 --> 01:29:38.280] Okay.
[01:29:38.280 --> 01:29:50.280] The next one is where he refused to send me the original note and what do they call it?
[01:29:50.280 --> 01:30:00.280] Elonges because he said it's improper discovery, but within 30 days.
[01:30:00.280 --> 01:30:04.280] Keep your voice down.
[01:30:04.280 --> 01:30:10.280] The government now has Russian technology that matches identities to voices so it can tell
[01:30:10.280 --> 01:30:12.280] who's doing the talking.
[01:30:12.280 --> 01:30:16.280] Dr. Katherine Albrecht back to tell you how it works after this.
[01:30:16.280 --> 01:30:18.280] Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.280 --> 01:30:21.280] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.280 --> 01:30:26.280] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.280 --> 01:30:28.280] So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.280 --> 01:30:32.280] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.280 --> 01:30:34.280] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.280 --> 01:30:40.280] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.280 --> 01:30:42.280] Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.280 --> 01:30:45.280] Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.280 --> 01:30:50.280] Since 2001, when the Patriot Act opened the doors to electronic surveillance,
[01:30:50.280 --> 01:30:54.280] Big Brother has gone crazy vacuuming up all of our data.
[01:30:54.280 --> 01:30:59.280] Now it has a new tactic, courtesy of our former communist allies, the Russians.
[01:30:59.280 --> 01:31:04.280] It's called voice grid nation, and it analyzes and identifies voices courtesy of Russia's
[01:31:04.280 --> 01:31:06.280] Speech Technology Center.
[01:31:06.280 --> 01:31:11.280] When authorities intercept a call, the speaker's voice is compared to millions of others,
[01:31:11.280 --> 01:31:12.280] like a fingerprint.
[01:31:12.280 --> 01:31:14.280] How long does it take for a match?
[01:31:14.280 --> 01:31:15.280] Three seconds.
[01:31:15.280 --> 01:31:18.280] So watch what you say on the phone, comrades.
[01:31:18.280 --> 01:31:22.280] Whether you say your name or not, Big Brother may know who's talking.
[01:31:22.280 --> 01:31:31.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albright for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.280 --> 01:31:36.280] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.280 --> 01:31:38.280] The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.280 --> 01:31:43.280] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.280 --> 01:31:46.280] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.280 --> 01:31:49.280] Thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:31:49.280 --> 01:31:50.280] I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.280 --> 01:31:52.280] I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.280 --> 01:31:53.280] I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:53.280 --> 01:31:54.280] I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.280 --> 01:31:56.280] I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.280 --> 01:31:58.280] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.280 --> 01:32:27.280] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:29.280 --> 01:32:32.280] To handle your claim and your roof, write the first time.
[01:32:32.280 --> 01:32:38.280] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.280 --> 01:32:45.280] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.280 --> 01:32:50.280] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:50.280 --> 01:32:56.280] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.280 --> 01:32:58.280] Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.280 --> 01:33:01.280] I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.280 --> 01:33:30.280] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:31.280 --> 01:33:36.280] Okay, we are back.
[01:33:36.280 --> 01:33:39.280] Randy Kelton rules our radio.
[01:33:39.280 --> 01:33:42.280] We're talking to Tina in California.
[01:33:42.280 --> 01:33:47.280] Okay, Tina, there's a lot you can do.
[01:33:47.280 --> 01:33:49.280] We're talking about the nature of the claim.
[01:33:49.280 --> 01:33:52.280] Wait, say that again?
[01:33:52.280 --> 01:33:55.280] You were talking about the nature of the claim?
[01:33:55.280 --> 01:34:02.280] Yeah, well, there's a lot you can do to beat these guys up, and you have...
[01:34:02.280 --> 01:34:05.280] One is enough to get you into the federal court.
[01:34:05.280 --> 01:34:09.280] The claim on discovery will be strictly a state issue.
[01:34:09.280 --> 01:34:13.280] That won't get you to the Fed.
[01:34:13.280 --> 01:34:31.280] Okay, well, even though the statute states that they have to provide it, if it's upon request, once the loan has been satisfied and they are refusing.
[01:34:31.280 --> 01:34:33.280] That's still a state issue.
[01:34:33.280 --> 01:34:47.280] Now, how you can go back after the lawyers for malpractice, but the lawyers are acting in the name of the principal.
[01:34:47.280 --> 01:34:54.280] If the court did not take action, then they've kind of denied you that.
[01:34:54.280 --> 01:34:57.280] That would take the appellate process.
[01:34:57.280 --> 01:35:05.280] Going through the appellate process, they've kind of lost that, and that's one of the things that bring you to the Fed.
[01:35:05.280 --> 01:35:15.280] I'm thinking how I could get to the Fed for denial of discovery.
[01:35:15.280 --> 01:35:31.280] We may think that the state courts are absolutely corrupt, but the Fed will not treat the state as if they were absolutely corrupt, and they are required to accept the ruling of the state.
[01:35:31.280 --> 01:35:41.280] So, if the state makes a ruling, the federal court cannot upset that ruling because it's registered a coda.
[01:35:41.280 --> 01:35:50.280] Even if they think the state is corrupt, they can't interrupt that ruling unless they have some specific evidence that would give them cause to.
[01:35:50.280 --> 01:35:58.280] And I can't think of how we can get to discovery as a federal issue.
[01:35:58.280 --> 01:36:00.280] It probably is a way.
[01:36:00.280 --> 01:36:04.280] I'm just blank on that at the moment.
[01:36:04.280 --> 01:36:12.280] In the letter study, they would provide it once the litigation was over, and they still won't provide it.
[01:36:12.280 --> 01:36:16.280] Even then, it would be irrelevant at that point.
[01:36:16.280 --> 01:36:28.280] My whole point is, if they have nothing to hide, why do they not produce what is asked until it's too late because they're trying to hide the truth?
[01:36:28.280 --> 01:36:30.280] Yes, because they don't have it.
[01:36:30.280 --> 01:36:32.280] Just produce it.
[01:36:32.280 --> 01:36:39.280] I have to go back to having done foreclosure in quite a while.
[01:36:39.280 --> 01:36:44.280] I have to go back to trying to find a federal avenue.
[01:36:44.280 --> 01:36:50.280] Anything on foreclosure should be federal anyway.
[01:36:50.280 --> 01:36:53.280] What's it doing in the state court?
[01:36:53.280 --> 01:36:57.280] We have non-judicial foreclosure laws here.
[01:36:57.280 --> 01:37:09.280] Yeah, but if you challenge the non-judicial foreclosure, you're charging an entity that is not based in California.
[01:37:09.280 --> 01:37:15.280] So that would give you diversity and that would make it federal.
[01:37:15.280 --> 01:37:18.280] So I'm trying to think of how to get there from discovery.
[01:37:18.280 --> 01:37:22.280] Right now, I'm drawing a blank.
[01:37:22.280 --> 01:37:28.280] But send me an email on this. This is too complex to do on the show.
[01:37:28.280 --> 01:37:34.280] I can examine this in more detail off the show, and I'm beginning to get more time.
[01:37:34.280 --> 01:37:41.280] I've had some stuff I want to do for you, but I haven't had time because I'm getting this other program put together.
[01:37:41.280 --> 01:37:50.280] But I'm getting people on board, so they're picking up some of the load, and I'll have more time to get to your issue.
[01:37:50.280 --> 01:37:58.280] So I've got a couple more callers. If you'll send me an email, I'll address this in email.
[01:37:58.280 --> 01:38:04.280] Ooh, that doesn't look good.
[01:38:04.280 --> 01:38:10.280] It looks like my caller board just crashed.
[01:38:10.280 --> 01:38:16.280] I'm not sure if I have anyone's even hearing me.
[01:38:16.280 --> 01:38:22.280] So now I need to figure out what to do.
[01:38:22.280 --> 01:38:32.280] Tim, if you can hear me, send me a Skype so that I will know I'm still going out on the air.
[01:38:32.280 --> 01:38:42.280] I don't have a producer today, so I have to kind of handle all this myself.
[01:38:42.280 --> 01:38:47.280] If I'm not going out, I'll push the panic button.
[01:38:47.280 --> 01:39:01.280] This is a little bit distressing. Let me bear with me while I see if I can check out the caller board and see why it's not up.
[01:39:01.280 --> 01:39:07.280] Let me see if my Skype is still connected. That appears to be.
[01:39:07.280 --> 01:39:12.280] Check, check, check, one, two. Okay, I seem to have output.
[01:39:12.280 --> 01:39:16.280] So guys, I think I'm going out on the air.
[01:39:16.280 --> 01:39:25.280] Now, my caller board showed to be on.
[01:39:25.280 --> 01:39:36.280] Let me turn it off. I'm trying to figure out what to do here. I'm not a producer, so sometimes that becomes difficult.
[01:39:36.280 --> 01:39:46.280] I am going to proceed as if I'm still on the air, although I don't know.
[01:39:46.280 --> 01:39:55.280] I've got a segment and a half to go, so since I'm not sure, I've certainly lost my caller boards.
[01:39:55.280 --> 01:40:04.280] Anybody who was on the caller board who was trying to call me, if you, you might try calling back in.
[01:40:04.280 --> 01:40:09.280] Good, there we go. Scott just came back in.
[01:40:09.280 --> 01:40:12.280] Okay, Scott.
[01:40:12.280 --> 01:40:13.280] Yes, sir.
[01:40:13.280 --> 01:40:19.280] Okay, for something happened, I lost everybody on the caller board.
[01:40:19.280 --> 01:40:22.280] Yeah, I called you back to let you know you're still alive.
[01:40:22.280 --> 01:40:35.280] Okay, good, good. That was a concern because I don't have a producer here. There is a way to see this stream that's going out live, but the producers can do that, but I can't.
[01:40:35.280 --> 01:40:38.280] So I have to just kind of guess. Thank you, Scott.
[01:40:38.280 --> 01:40:46.280] I don't know why I lost Tim and who else did I have? That's someone else.
[01:40:46.280 --> 01:40:50.280] Tim, if you're out there, call me back. I will take your call.
[01:40:50.280 --> 01:40:52.280] Thank you, Scott.
[01:40:52.280 --> 01:40:54.280] No problem.
[01:40:54.280 --> 01:41:01.280] Okay, in the meantime, waiting for them, I'll go back to an issue I wanted to talk about.
[01:41:01.280 --> 01:41:06.280] A future I see coming at us.
[01:41:06.280 --> 01:41:15.280] I started to seek funding to launch my electronic lawyer.
[01:41:15.280 --> 01:41:31.280] And launching the electronic lawyer with an IPO, an initial private, I mean, initial, what is IPO, initial private offering.
[01:41:31.280 --> 01:41:41.280] That's where I get people to purchase a share in my business.
[01:41:41.280 --> 01:41:54.280] Well, I have an elephant in the corner. There's one company out there that's a major player and my technology will totally undermine their business model.
[01:41:54.280 --> 01:42:02.280] They could produce a competing product, but the competing product would undermine their business model just like mine does.
[01:42:02.280 --> 01:42:05.280] So that's not an effective option.
[01:42:05.280 --> 01:42:10.280] The only effective option is to buy out all my investors to shut me down.
[01:42:10.280 --> 01:42:16.280] So an IPO wasn't an effective strategy.
[01:42:16.280 --> 01:42:23.280] And then I came across ICO, an initial coin offering.
[01:42:23.280 --> 01:42:33.280] And what that is, it's instead of selling percentages of my business, I sell prepaid services.
[01:42:33.280 --> 01:42:46.280] See, we're putting together a business that will do an evaluation of a criminal case, determine all of the motions and pleadings indicated by the facts of the case,
[01:42:46.280 --> 01:42:53.280] and then produce all those motions and pleadings in fully operating format ready for download.
[01:42:53.280 --> 01:42:57.280] So the product we're selling is the download.
[01:42:57.280 --> 01:43:04.280] And by selling prepaid services, we don't give up a percentage of the business.
[01:43:04.280 --> 01:43:07.280] That's what a token sale is.
[01:43:07.280 --> 01:43:11.280] And it looks like my caller board came back up.
[01:43:11.280 --> 01:43:13.280] Both Tim and John showed back up again.
[01:43:13.280 --> 01:43:18.280] So I'll go ahead and go to my callers and I'll talk about this when we have more time.
[01:43:18.280 --> 01:43:21.280] I've got about 45 seconds before the break.
[01:43:21.280 --> 01:43:28.280] Tim, quickly, what do you have for us on the other side?
[01:43:28.280 --> 01:43:42.280] Well, I mean, I was just going to talk to you a little bit about the issue with trying to get a stay on the appeal for the appeal.
[01:43:42.280 --> 01:44:00.280] Okay, time's up. Hang on. Be right back. Randy Kelton with La Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.280 --> 01:44:17.280] Nutritious food is real body armor. It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:17.280 --> 01:44:23.280] People have been confused about this plan for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:44:23.280 --> 01:44:30.280] Now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp. They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.280 --> 01:44:39.280] HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.280 --> 01:45:04.280] Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients. Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempUSA.org.
[01:45:04.280 --> 01:45:12.280] It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway, sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:45:12.280 --> 01:45:19.280] Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:45:19.280 --> 01:45:29.280] From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spike's Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:45:29.280 --> 01:45:39.280] When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:45:39.280 --> 01:45:53.280] And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[01:45:53.280 --> 01:46:00.280] To accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency, go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:46:24.280 --> 01:46:31.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Legal 101 Radio and we're talking to Tim in Texas.
[01:46:31.280 --> 01:46:42.280] Okay, Tim, about a state of actions. Tim, in his case, we've got to the point that we file for a notice of appeal.
[01:46:42.280 --> 01:46:59.280] The problem is, is to have a hearing set where Tim has been commanded by the court to bring in books and papers and discovery so the other side can discover all his financial information.
[01:46:59.280 --> 01:47:18.280] And the problem with that is, is once they get it, then their private information is no longer in their control. It's in control of the court of these lawyers who've shown themselves to be absolutely, totally malicious.
[01:47:18.280 --> 01:47:22.280] Does that pretty well frame your concern, Tim?
[01:47:22.280 --> 01:47:24.280] Yes, sir.
[01:47:24.280 --> 01:47:29.280] So what is your question?
[01:47:29.280 --> 01:47:47.280] Okay, so what our plan was to go in and to get them to give us a motion of stay and then if he didn't grant it, then we were going to go to the appeals court for an emergency motion of stay.
[01:47:47.280 --> 01:47:56.280] And so he's been out of town all week at a judge's convention. So I basically have to go up there.
[01:47:56.280 --> 01:48:07.280] Now, you're familiar with the courtroom because it's in the county that we both live in. So, you know, it's going to be Monday. He's going to be backed up and all this.
[01:48:07.280 --> 01:48:19.280] So I'm going to have to sit there from the time that they open up with documents and try to get his attention.
[01:48:19.280 --> 01:48:33.280] It doesn't matter. It will be a problem. But sometimes in order to set him up and create your position, it's inconvenient.
[01:48:33.280 --> 01:48:39.280] But you have to get him to refuse to hear you and refuse to hear your request for stay.
[01:48:39.280 --> 01:48:59.280] And you don't have time to wait on him. So you go down there and you might get him to, you know, tell the bailiff that you have business with court and give him the motion for a stay and get the judge to tell the bailiff that he's not going to have time to hear your issue today.
[01:48:59.280 --> 01:49:01.280] That's all you need.
[01:49:01.280 --> 01:49:14.280] If we go to the court of appeals for emergency restraining order, we have to show that we have already exercised an attempt at remedy in the state court.
[01:49:14.280 --> 01:49:16.280] Yes.
[01:49:16.280 --> 01:49:39.280] If we get the state court to say they don't have time to get to you, then your time is short before this hearing where you have been ordered to appear. So all you need to do is say you couldn't get to this court, to the district court, because the district court refused to hear you.
[01:49:39.280 --> 01:49:47.280] And now you have...
[01:49:47.280 --> 01:49:58.280] Well, I just... We're pretty sure that he's not going to grant some motion to stay. He has not granted anything else. He has not listened to anything that we have said, nothing.
[01:49:58.280 --> 01:50:11.280] So are we going to be prepared to go? I mean, from what I've seen, the notice of appeal and the motion for stay were like two lines.
[01:50:11.280 --> 01:50:13.280] Yes.
[01:50:13.280 --> 01:50:19.280] I mean, these are things that could have been prepared weeks ago, but they weren't. And so now it's put us on a deadline.
[01:50:19.280 --> 01:50:35.280] No, we just... They couldn't have been prepared weeks ago. They had to be prepared after the final hearing, and then we filed a request for findings of fact.
[01:50:35.280 --> 01:50:36.280] Yes.
[01:50:36.280 --> 01:50:46.280] And we had to give him time to provide findings of fact, because if he provided findings of fact, then we could file a motion for a retrial based on his findings of fact.
[01:50:46.280 --> 01:50:49.280] But he's not done that in the other time.
[01:50:49.280 --> 01:50:52.280] So we had to wait and give him time to produce, and he didn't.
[01:50:52.280 --> 01:50:54.280] Now, we...
[01:50:54.280 --> 01:51:06.280] Then we filed the notice of appeal, and we are timely with the notice of appeal, because his time limit to file the findings of fact was 20 days.
[01:51:06.280 --> 01:51:12.280] Okay. So 20 days was the... Was that today?
[01:51:12.280 --> 01:51:18.280] No, it was about the time we filed the notice of appeal.
[01:51:18.280 --> 01:51:25.280] Okay. So, but we didn't... Okay, but we did not remind him, because we had to do that too, right?
[01:51:25.280 --> 01:51:30.280] Right. It was clear he wasn't filing it, so we had to move ahead with the notice of appeal.
[01:51:30.280 --> 01:51:31.280] Okay.
[01:51:31.280 --> 01:51:46.280] And we immediately come back the next day with a motion for stay of this hearing where you're going to require you to produce your records, because that won't be appropriate if the Court of Appeals rules are in your favor.
[01:51:46.280 --> 01:51:54.280] So it gives the judge an opportunity to grant stay if he doesn't... Refuses to hear it or doesn't have time.
[01:51:54.280 --> 01:52:00.280] If we don't have time to wait, so we go to the Court of Appeals for an emergency restraining order.
[01:52:00.280 --> 01:52:01.280] Okay.
[01:52:01.280 --> 01:52:03.280] You just have to follow a few steps there.
[01:52:03.280 --> 01:52:08.280] We just have to take down there, file it, and then hope.
[01:52:08.280 --> 01:52:21.280] Yeah, you have to be able to show the Court of Appeals. Before you ask the Court of Appeals to step on the District Court, you have to show that you went to the District Court for remedy, and you didn't just bypass them.
[01:52:21.280 --> 01:52:23.280] That's why we have to do this.
[01:52:23.280 --> 01:52:25.280] Okay.
[01:52:25.280 --> 01:52:29.280] It was awful convenient for him to be out of town, wasn't it?
[01:52:29.280 --> 01:52:42.280] Yeah, it was. But if he's at a judge's convention, I'm going to bet you he's answering a lot of questions about this mandamus against him.
[01:52:42.280 --> 01:52:43.280] Oh, yeah.
[01:52:43.280 --> 01:52:48.280] Good chance he is not happy.
[01:52:48.280 --> 01:52:58.280] Having explained to all of these judges how a pro se mandamus got ruled in the pro se's favor in his court.
[01:52:58.280 --> 01:53:03.280] I don't really have time to celebrate about it yet, so we did get that part.
[01:53:03.280 --> 01:53:05.280] That's the thing about it.
[01:53:05.280 --> 01:53:14.280] And then, of course, the city administrators who orchestrated most of the stuff, along with the attorneys, is now on leave.
[01:53:14.280 --> 01:53:17.280] Okay, explain that quickly for everybody.
[01:53:17.280 --> 01:53:30.280] From the beginning, it appeared as though the city administrator had a vendetta against Tim's wife and orchestrated all of this. Tell them what just happened to the city administrator.
[01:53:30.280 --> 01:53:35.280] Well, the city administrator, they had the last budget meeting Wednesday night.
[01:53:35.280 --> 01:53:39.280] No, you're not telling them. You're just telling the end.
[01:53:39.280 --> 01:53:45.280] The city administrator fired a city employee so she could hire her son.
[01:53:45.280 --> 01:53:51.280] Yes, she hired her son, even though it was part-time contract work for mowing.
[01:53:51.280 --> 01:54:05.280] But at the same time, she had told the other employee, which was a girl, which is foolish to do this anyway, that she was going to have to let her go and hire someone who had the actual licenses to do water and sewer.
[01:54:05.280 --> 01:54:07.280] And her son does not.
[01:54:07.280 --> 01:54:20.280] So when we found out about it, one lady friend of ours called the councilman. The councilman called Diane, the city administrator, and the city administrator said, no, I have not hired my son.
[01:54:20.280 --> 01:54:33.280] And then the son, after about six weeks of this going on, finally gets on Facebook himself and says, thanks to you, I got fired.
[01:54:33.280 --> 01:54:43.280] The job I've had for four months. So she'd been lying to the council saying their son did not work for the city.
[01:54:43.280 --> 01:54:50.280] Why would you do something like that? I mean, why would you lie if you did not know?
[01:54:50.280 --> 01:55:04.280] I mean, you could have the defense say nepotism, which is hiring. You have the ability to hire and fire. You're not supposed to do that in the state of Texas. I think it's rule positive.
[01:55:04.280 --> 01:55:07.280] Within three degrees of co-sanguinity.
[01:55:07.280 --> 01:55:11.280] Yes, sanguinity, whatever it is anyway.
[01:55:11.280 --> 01:55:21.280] So she's lied to the council and it's not just that, but it was nepotism, but it was lying to the council.
[01:55:21.280 --> 01:55:36.280] So when that happens, so they had an executive session, they pulled her assistant in and then they pulled the superintendent in and they asked a whole bunch of questions because it probably lasted an hour and a half, my wife said.
[01:55:36.280 --> 01:55:47.280] And then they came out and they said she's being placed on leave while we investigate or get the law firm to launch an investigation into the city administrator's misconduct.
[01:55:47.280 --> 01:55:56.280] And when I looked up the thing about nepotism, it lists misconduct as one of the things that she gets fired for.
[01:55:56.280 --> 01:56:06.280] And what I didn't know was that she kept saying, I don't know why they don't just go ahead and fire me because obviously I'm going to get fired.
[01:56:06.280 --> 01:56:22.280] So today she went to go pick up her check and she was escorted in to get her check and escorted out. So they're not giving her free reign because someone mentioned she, if they're erasing files of her hard drives, you know.
[01:56:22.280 --> 01:56:28.280] So there's no telling what this could happen, but she could wind up in jail over this.
[01:56:28.280 --> 01:56:32.280] I don't think so. It's a misdemeanor.
[01:56:32.280 --> 01:56:35.280] It's a class A misdemeanor.
[01:56:35.280 --> 01:56:36.280] Okay.
[01:56:36.280 --> 01:56:43.280] 39.02 Texas Penal Code, year in jail, $10,000 fine.
[01:56:43.280 --> 01:56:45.280] Okay.
[01:56:45.280 --> 01:56:48.280] So yeah, she could wind up in jail over this.
[01:56:48.280 --> 01:56:56.280] Well, see, and we haven't even brought up the other things that she's done, like the thing with the attorney general where she wouldn't fill our records request.
[01:56:56.280 --> 01:56:58.280] And the thing with...
[01:56:58.280 --> 01:57:00.280] That one's also a class A misdemeanor.
[01:57:00.280 --> 01:57:10.280] It turned me into the sales tax people and then harassing them. Where's my money, you know, and then everything we were doing was legal.
[01:57:10.280 --> 01:57:28.280] So she was doing stuff. And if they were paying this lady the huge salary that she's making to harass me, it just shows that this council is a very hands-off.
[01:57:28.280 --> 01:57:38.280] They want to rush in there to the council meeting and be the council members and then have her spoon feed everything to them.
[01:57:38.280 --> 01:57:47.280] And in a town this small, you know, you would think that things would go a lot smoother, but they don't.
[01:57:47.280 --> 01:57:58.280] And it's just, you know, when you're talking about things being political, that's what I would like to see is that the council draw back.
[01:57:58.280 --> 01:58:03.280] But it's like they hired the attorneys to do this, to launch this investigation.
[01:58:03.280 --> 01:58:09.280] Why would they do that? Why wouldn't they send it to a state agency to do the investigation?
[01:58:09.280 --> 01:58:13.280] Why would they have it in-house where they would hire their own attorneys to do this?
[01:58:13.280 --> 01:58:23.280] Well, you can go file criminal charges with the district attorney and bring him into it. But we are out of time.
[01:58:23.280 --> 01:58:25.280] Okay. All right.
[01:58:25.280 --> 01:58:33.280] I'm sorry we didn't get to use Houston via an e-mail. We'll talk offline. This is Randy Kelton, Rula Law Radio.
[01:58:33.280 --> 01:58:40.280] We'll be back next week, Monday with Eddie for his traffic show. And then we'll be back Thursday and Friday.
[01:58:40.280 --> 01:58:50.280] Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:57.280] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.280 --> 01:59:04.280] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse,
[01:59:04.280 --> 01:59:08.280] helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.280 --> 01:59:20.280] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.280 --> 01:59:27.280] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps,
[01:59:27.280 --> 01:59:32.280] and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.280 --> 01:59:40.280] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.280 --> 01:59:59.280] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.