ROL_2018-07-23_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:08.000 --> 00:15.000]  bulletins for the commodities market, today's history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:16.000 --> 00:19.000]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:19.000 --> 00:29.000]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22
[00:30.000 --> 00:31.000]  Silver $16.68
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.000]  Texas Crude $65.51
[00:35.000 --> 00:37.000]  BTC at $6,902.19
[00:38.000 --> 00:40.000]  Ethereum at $420.80
[00:41.000 --> 00:43.000]  Bitcoin Cash at $652.90
[00:43.000 --> 00:48.000]  And finally Litecoins at $114.34, a crypto coin.
[00:55.000 --> 01:02.000]  Today in history, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968,
[01:03.000 --> 01:08.000]  which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:08.000 --> 01:14.000]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in public schools,
[01:15.000 --> 01:19.000]  in employment, and public accommodations for places of business, today in history.
[01:24.000 --> 01:29.000]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack on civilians in the city of Duma,
[01:30.000 --> 01:36.000]  which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
[01:36.000 --> 01:42.000]  by the United States, and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as of yet.
[01:43.000 --> 01:48.000]  President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday, that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria,
[01:49.000 --> 01:52.000]  get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new and smart.
[01:53.000 --> 01:58.000]  Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:58.000 --> 02:06.000]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:07.000 --> 02:15.000]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[02:16.000 --> 02:20.000]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil war,
[02:20.000 --> 02:27.000]  a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments,
[02:28.000 --> 02:32.000]  with ISIS being one of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:33.000 --> 02:40.000]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists
[02:41.000 --> 02:44.000]  and not at a legitimate government, which has been fighting terrorists,
[02:44.000 --> 02:51.000]  or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at.
[02:51.000 --> 03:14.000]  This was Rick Brody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[03:22.000 --> 03:28.000]  I think the people being victimized by criminal cops, psychopathic predators, terrorize the neighborhood blocks,
[03:29.000 --> 03:33.000]  equip with pepper spray, mate-cut cases and glocks, they like serial killers dacking out subliminal thoughts,
[03:34.000 --> 03:38.000]  forget what you talk, these cops have got a license to kill, witness intimidation means that they can use it at will,
[03:39.000 --> 03:44.000]  co-design on keys that the pigs will never let out a squeal, and if they go to court, they know the judge will make them a deal, for real.
[03:44.000 --> 03:50.000]  That's why they stoppin' me, lockin' me up and stoppin' me, confiscatin' my property, talkin' in my demography,
[03:51.000 --> 03:55.000]  makin' the poor commodity, prostitin' off of poverty, and for some policy support, a prison economy, yeah.
[03:56.000 --> 03:59.000]  No one makes money when the pilot stops hatin' fatalities, the way to make a criminal crock,
[04:00.000 --> 04:02.000]  blood in the gutters, how to risk whether they break the cops.
[04:03.000 --> 04:06.000]  Good evening, folks. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:06.000 --> 04:13.000]  It is July 23rd, 2018. This is not a rerun. We are live tonight.
[04:14.000 --> 04:22.000]  Interestingly enough, I've gotten several emails saying that people have tried to get police officers and attorneys to listen to my show,
[04:23.000 --> 04:25.000]  and they haven't gotten past the opening song.
[04:25.000 --> 04:35.000]  Well, I guess the only thing I can say to that is, is if you are one of those kind that finds offense in the truth,
[04:36.000 --> 04:42.000]  then you wouldn't get anything out of my show anyway, because you wouldn't listen long enough to understand what it's about to begin with.
[04:43.000 --> 04:52.000]  If you think you can't, if you can't get past that song, there is no way you're getting past the first time I say something about your job, guaranteed.
[04:52.000 --> 05:03.000]  So I can't help those that take offense and don't want to listen just because they don't want to accept the truth of what the lead-in song to this show is saying,
[05:04.000 --> 05:13.000]  because it is a well-documented fact that everything that happens that's in that song actually happens.
[05:14.000 --> 05:20.000]  And if you take offense to the idea that it happens, then you're really not paying attention, or you just simply don't want to know.
[05:20.000 --> 05:23.000]  And there's not a lot I can do to change your mind one way or the other.
[05:24.000 --> 05:29.000]  So listening to this show really wouldn't help you anyway, because you're already too close-minded to care or listen.
[05:30.000 --> 05:36.000]  Now, if you can listen to the song and understand and shake your head and go, yeah, I wish that wasn't the case, but it's true,
[05:37.000 --> 05:39.000]  well, then maybe you'll get something out of the show after all.
[05:40.000 --> 05:41.000]  We'll just have to wait and see.
[05:41.000 --> 05:57.000]  Now, that being said, I made you aware here a while back that the State Bar Association is working toward the effort of coming after me for unauthorized practice of law,
[05:58.000 --> 06:05.000]  because I helped my friend Dan with an administrative hearing in his business in which I also have an interest and work.
[06:05.000 --> 06:14.000]  So they're trying to make it where, you know, they're trying to say that I can't help him, but there's a couple of problems with what they did in the beginning with.
[06:15.000 --> 06:17.000]  One, they went after him, not his business.
[06:18.000 --> 06:21.000]  They have no authority to go after him.
[06:22.000 --> 06:27.000]  They can only administratively take action against his business, and they weren't doing that.
[06:28.000 --> 06:31.000]  That right there deprived him of jurisdiction all by itself.
[06:31.000 --> 06:39.000]  But what do you expect when you're dealing with mindset stupidity and not anybody that actually cares about what the law says?
[06:40.000 --> 06:54.000]  Now, on top of that, I got to thinking about some things in relation to how the bar operates in relation to the unauthorized practice of law.
[06:54.000 --> 07:01.000]  Now, let's look at something specific that's in the Texas Constitution.
[07:02.000 --> 07:05.000]  And let's see.
[07:06.000 --> 07:14.000]  Article 1, Section 8 of the Texas Constitution, Freedom of Speech and Press, also liable.
[07:14.000 --> 07:24.000]  Every person shall be at liberty to speak, write, or publish his opinions on any subject.
[07:25.000 --> 07:35.000]  Being responsible for the abuse of that privilege and no law shall ever be passed curtailing the liberty of speech or of the press.
[07:35.000 --> 07:50.000]  In prosecutions for the publication of papers, investigating the conduct of officers or men in public capacity or when the matter published is proper for public information, the truth thereof may be given in evidence.
[07:51.000 --> 07:59.000]  And in all indictments for liables, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts under the direction of the court as in other cases.
[07:59.000 --> 08:06.000]  Now, two things about Section 8 that you need to pay attention to right off the bat.
[08:07.000 --> 08:18.000]  The first thing is, is the people of Texas have the right to speak and write, as in write it down and publish it, on any subject.
[08:19.000 --> 08:20.000]  That includes law.
[08:20.000 --> 08:33.000]  Okay? Any subject, the only time we can be held accountable for what we write or say is when it constitutes slander or liable of an individual.
[08:34.000 --> 08:35.000]  Okay?
[08:36.000 --> 08:43.000]  Otherwise, there's nothing the Bar Association can do to stop me from writing about the law.
[08:43.000 --> 08:49.000]  Even if it's documents that can be used by others in illegal proceeding.
[08:50.000 --> 08:51.000]  Why?
[08:52.000 --> 08:55.000]  Because I am free to write and publish anything I want.
[08:57.000 --> 09:04.000]  I am only responsible for slander or liable against someone else, which you can't slander or liable a public official.
[09:05.000 --> 09:06.000]  Okay?
[09:07.000 --> 09:10.000]  When you're talking about them in their public capacity anyway.
[09:10.000 --> 09:27.000]  Now, that being said, the second thing about Section 8 is where the courts are telling people that the judge is the one who gives the law and the jury may only pay attention to the facts.
[09:28.000 --> 09:32.000]  Right here, the Texas Constitution says, oh no, that ain't the way it works.
[09:32.000 --> 09:50.000]  In all indictments for liables, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts, as in other cases, not other liable cases, in other cases in general.
[09:51.000 --> 09:52.000]  Okay?
[09:53.000 --> 09:58.000]  That means that it doesn't matter whether it's a civil case, it doesn't matter whether it's a criminal case.
[09:58.000 --> 10:05.000]  The jury has the right under the Texas Bill of Rights to determine the law and the facts.
[10:06.000 --> 10:07.000]  Period.
[10:09.000 --> 10:18.000]  Now, to kick them even harder in the teeth, we come down to Article 1, Section 29, which I've told you all about before.
[10:19.000 --> 10:24.000]  This is the clinch your butthole's public servants because there's nothing you can do about what's to come.
[10:25.000 --> 10:26.000]  And here's what it says.
[10:26.000 --> 10:32.000]  Section 29, Bill of Rights accepted from powers of government and inviolate.
[10:33.000 --> 10:52.000]  To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare that everything in this Bill of Rights is accepted out of the general powers of government and shall forever remain inviolate.
[10:52.000 --> 11:00.000]  And all laws contrary thereto or to the following provisions shall be void.
[11:03.000 --> 11:18.000]  So that means that any law that has been enacted saying that I cannot write paperwork that talks about the law even if someone can use it in court is a violation of the Bill of Rights.
[11:18.000 --> 11:25.000]  Therefore, it is unconstitutional law on its face and is null and void.
[11:26.000 --> 11:27.000]  Period.
[11:29.000 --> 11:30.000]  Okay.
[11:30.000 --> 11:32.000]  Now, here's the other thing.
[11:34.000 --> 11:39.000]  The right to representation by counsel.
[11:39.000 --> 11:50.000]  When you get up here to Section 10 of Article 1, when it says that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have a speedy trial, a speedy public trial by an impartial jury.
[11:51.000 --> 11:56.000]  He shall have the right to demand the nature and cause of the accusations against him and to have a copy thereof.
[11:57.000 --> 11:59.000]  He shall not be compelled to give evidence against himself.
[11:59.000 --> 12:14.000]  And he shall have the right of being heard by himself or counsel or both and shall be confronted by the witnesses against him and shall have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, except that when the witnesses resides out of state and blah, blah, blah.
[12:15.000 --> 12:19.000]  The defendant and the state shall have the right to produce and have the evidence submitted by deposition, blah, blah, blah.
[12:20.000 --> 12:21.000]  Okay.
[12:21.000 --> 12:22.000]  And let's see.
[12:25.000 --> 12:26.000]  Yeah.
[12:26.000 --> 12:28.000]  Anyway, by counsel or both.
[12:28.000 --> 12:38.000]  Now, when I have the right to counsel, the court cannot say that that right is no longer available because I cannot be incarcerated for the offense.
[12:38.000 --> 12:39.000]  Why?
[12:39.000 --> 12:53.000]  Because that determination by the court is an exercise of the court's general powers, which is a violation of Article 1, Section 10, and thus is unconstitutional on its face.
[12:53.000 --> 13:03.000]  Now, folks, I don't know whether your particular state constitution contains these particular types of clauses or similar language, though it should.
[13:03.000 --> 13:23.000]  But the fact remains that if you can read this and not come to the conclusion that the bar associations and every member of them that is currently in control of every department of our government in the state of Texas,
[13:23.000 --> 13:36.000]  not to mention the federal level, are not committing sedition and acts of treason in what they do, then you're dumber than you look.
[13:38.000 --> 13:47.000]  Because the only person that would even begin to argue that's not what it is means is the person guilty of committing the crimes I'm talking about.
[13:47.000 --> 14:00.000]  Because the only goal they have is to save their own butt once we come to the knowledge that their criminals, they've always been criminals.
[14:00.000 --> 14:08.000]  They know they're criminals and they're counting on you to being too uninformed and too cowardly to hold them accountable for it.
[14:08.000 --> 14:18.000]  And it just gets better and better and better every single day, right?
[14:18.000 --> 14:24.000]  Everything's improving. Everything's getting better for us as individuals, our rights and our liberties. Wake the hell up!
[14:26.000 --> 14:34.000]  You are more enslaved today than most of the people that were chained on a plantation and you don't even know it.
[14:34.000 --> 14:50.000]  Because everything that you do is permitted, licensed, taxed or otherwise disallowed or allowed by government. Everything!
[14:55.000 --> 14:58.000]  And yet you run around all day saying you're free.
[14:58.000 --> 15:10.000]  I don't understand that mindset. I don't understand what there is about freedom that you see in that arrangement.
[15:10.000 --> 15:24.000]  It boggles my mind that you can understand that that is how things currently work and still say you're free.
[15:28.000 --> 15:29.000]  That's delusional.
[15:29.000 --> 15:54.000]  Now, when it comes to the unauthorized practice of law stuff that I just read, why the State Bar Association cannot prevent me or anyone else in the state of Texas from writing documents, even if people are going to use those documents in court, is a simple fact that such a law runs afoul of the Bill of Rights.
[15:54.000 --> 16:11.000]  It's completely unconstitutional on its face, but the problem remains the same in that case as it does in every other and that is that the only people who will make the determination that I'm right are the ones who will lose control if they do.
[16:11.000 --> 16:32.000]  Now, you want to talk about a rigged outcome to an argument, there you have it, because the people that are to blame for the problems we have in what we call our freedom are also the very ones that control whether or not the truth is allowed to be known and exercised.
[16:32.000 --> 16:45.000]  As the saying goes, to find out who truly rules your republic or your whatever, to find out who it is you're not allowed to criticize.
[16:46.000 --> 16:49.000]  Then you also know what kind of government you've got.
[16:49.000 --> 17:02.000]  Alright folks, y'all hang on, we will be right back after this break.
[17:19.000 --> 17:28.000]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:28.000 --> 17:34.000]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:34.000 --> 17:38.000]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:38.000 --> 17:43.000]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:43.000 --> 17:52.000]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[17:52.000 --> 17:55.000]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:55.000 --> 18:00.000]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[18:05.000 --> 18:15.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meyers Proven Method. Michael Meyers has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons. How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Meyers Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflongradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meyers banner or email Michael Meyers at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's ruleoflongradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:32.000 --> 19:44.000]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[19:44.000 --> 19:49.000]  The lines are open if you want to call in and get in line and talk about something.
[19:49.000 --> 19:56.000]  Right now we do have one caller up on the board and yes, I am double my diatribe for the evening unless I run out of callers.
[19:56.000 --> 20:03.000]  Hopefully that will help some of the other folks out there understand what the unauthorized practice of law does and does not mean in the state of Texas
[20:03.000 --> 20:15.000]  because that law on its face is null and void when it comes to the issue of me writing or speaking or assisting someone with that information.
[20:15.000 --> 20:25.000]  That's just all there is to it. Whether the courts and the attorneys like it or not, their way of doing things runs afoul of our bill of rights.
[20:25.000 --> 20:29.000]  So, tough tookies there, dudes.
[20:29.000 --> 20:35.000]  All right, that being said, let's go to John in New York. John, what can we do for you?
[20:35.000 --> 20:37.000]  Hi, how you doing, man?
[20:37.000 --> 20:41.000]  Well, I guess I'm doing all right. Nobody's shooting at me.
[20:41.000 --> 20:45.000]  That's good. Well, if they do, shoot back.
[20:45.000 --> 20:53.000]  Like I've always said, if you're going to shoot at me, you better hit me and kill me because I shoot back and I'm an excellent shot.
[20:53.000 --> 20:57.000]  I promise I won't take any shots.
[20:57.000 --> 21:07.000]  All right. I might have said this once before when you brought up about the Bar Association, but it bears repeating because I don't think a lot of Americans know this.
[21:07.000 --> 21:11.000]  The American Bar Association, now you were talking about the State Bar.
[21:11.000 --> 21:20.000]  The American Bar Association sold out the American people in 1947. They signed an agreement with the United Nations.
[21:20.000 --> 21:31.000]  You know, those people over there, the United Nations, that when we were in grammar school, they taught us what a bunch of good white hat wearing white horse riding good guys they were.
[21:31.000 --> 21:40.000]  Well, they're not. They're the ones that are behind the cabal, the banking cabal, and one world government, and one world religion, and so on and so forth.
[21:40.000 --> 21:47.000]  And selling out the American people is what the Bar Association did. They signed an agreement in 1947 with...
[21:47.000 --> 21:56.000]  Hold on just a second, John. They actually sold us out long before then. McCarthy was after them during the McCarthy era.
[21:56.000 --> 22:08.000]  The McCarthyism thing that was going on with his committee, the Committee on Un-American Activities, where he had evidence.
[22:08.000 --> 22:17.000]  He's got an entire congressional document on how the Bar Associations are actually communist-based entities.
[22:17.000 --> 22:25.000]  They were started and populated by communists, and they're still teaching communism in what they do.
[22:25.000 --> 22:37.000]  That's why everybody that has a bar card is forbidden to make certain arguments in court, to challenge jurisdiction of a judge, and to always say the state is right.
[22:37.000 --> 22:46.000]  Because that's what communism is. The state is always right. The people never are if it conflicts with what the state wants.
[22:46.000 --> 22:56.000]  Well, yeah, that and the fact that they're officers of the court. Lawyers are always the first student is to be officer of the court.
[22:56.000 --> 23:00.000]  Yeah, I got all that, but anyway, did you have a question about something?
[23:00.000 --> 23:06.000]  Yeah, I sure do. You helped me with a situation with one of my relative's people.
[23:06.000 --> 23:12.000]  You keep turning away from your phone and you muffle out when you do that. Please speak directly into the phone.
[23:12.000 --> 23:14.000]  Okay, now, how's that?
[23:14.000 --> 23:16.000]  That's good, if you'll stay that way.
[23:16.000 --> 23:25.000]  Yeah, the AGC must not be working right. Okay, certain frequencies will make the AGC bounce around, automatic gain control.
[23:25.000 --> 23:31.000]  Okay, here we go. You gave me help with my relative's T-belt and T-belt ticket.
[23:31.000 --> 23:39.000]  And the officer, I'll just give you a quick replay. And then I'll tell you what he did with my relative's.
[23:39.000 --> 23:47.000]  Officer said that you weren't wearing your T-belt. And my relatives and a witness in this car both got out and said,
[23:47.000 --> 23:53.000]  No, I was wearing the T-belt. And so the officer's story quickly changed right away.
[23:53.000 --> 24:01.000]  Oh, well, you weren't wearing it properly. Uh-huh. Now, I don't believe him, but that's beside the point.
[24:01.000 --> 24:05.000]  The officer said you had your T-belt under your arm and the T-belt...
[24:05.000 --> 24:10.000]  Well, John, wait a minute. You did this on... You went through this story on the last show.
[24:10.000 --> 24:13.000]  Yeah, yeah, yeah. I just want to bring up the snow.
[24:13.000 --> 24:16.000]  So something new has developed in that?
[24:16.000 --> 24:18.000]  Well, I'm almost done.
[24:18.000 --> 24:24.000]  The officer said you had your T-belt under your arm and the T-belt went straight down the side of the seat.
[24:24.000 --> 24:32.000]  It's a 1992 Ford Mustang and the T-belt doesn't really do that no matter how you wear or don't wear the T-belt.
[24:32.000 --> 24:37.000]  It doesn't go straight down the side of the seat. At least I didn't see it do that.
[24:37.000 --> 24:43.000]  So I think that was a lie. I think the officer was just looking for money and I think that he pumped it up.
[24:43.000 --> 24:52.000]  Well, that's beside the point. That being said, my relatives took their advice and got the first foreign affidavits done
[24:52.000 --> 24:58.000]  and a motion to dismiss based on proof of innocence based on me to affidavits.
[24:58.000 --> 25:02.000]  Now, when we get into court, I'm going to be there with him.
[25:02.000 --> 25:07.000]  And now when he gets into court and I'm there and he presents that to the judge,
[25:07.000 --> 25:16.000]  I can't picture any self-respecting dirty judge who wants that extra $50,000, $200,000, $300,000, whatever
[25:16.000 --> 25:23.000]  to say, well, you've got two against one here and I guess the officer's outnumbered.
[25:23.000 --> 25:28.000]  I can't picture a dirty judge because these guys are, especially in this one county.
[25:28.000 --> 25:30.000]  I can't picture them saying that.
[25:30.000 --> 25:40.000]  That's a good thing. He's going to have to make, he can't just present the affidavit and that be the end of it, 99 times out of 100.
[25:40.000 --> 25:50.000]  Now, he may get a walk from the prosecutor, but he's not going to get it from the judge because the judge can't decide the evidence unless it's a bench trial.
[25:50.000 --> 25:59.000]  So the fact is, is even though he may have that, he may be having to go through the trial process depending upon what kind of trial he asked for.
[25:59.000 --> 26:03.000]  Either way, the affidavit is not admissible until it's been admitted as evidence,
[26:03.000 --> 26:10.000]  which means the guy who made it's going to have to take the stand unless the prosecutor drops the case based upon the fact that it exists,
[26:10.000 --> 26:16.000]  which I wouldn't count on without something else as well.
[26:16.000 --> 26:35.000]  You know, and I know that this court has a long history of being crooked, and I can't picture the judge taking this sitting down because he had two other tickets in the same county, one before him, one before this judge, and one before another judge.
[26:35.000 --> 26:46.000]  They both were dismissed because in the first case, the deposition never arrived on time, and in the second case, the deposition never arrived on time, but the cop didn't show up for the trial.
[26:46.000 --> 26:52.000]  So he had them dismissed in both areas, and I thank you for that. I thank Randy and I thank you for that.
[26:52.000 --> 26:58.000]  So what I'm trying to say is, and yeah, what was I trying to say?
[26:58.000 --> 27:06.000]  Well, I don't trust the judge. I don't trust the prosecutor. It's all about money. It's a kangaroo court. It's a dog and pony show.
[27:06.000 --> 27:25.000]  So advise me. It's my understanding that according to the way things are supposed to work with due process, when you get a ticket, you're really supposed to have a preliminary hearing first, not just an appearance.
[27:25.000 --> 27:31.000]  It depends upon how the state treats the alleged defense.
[27:31.000 --> 27:42.000]  If it's civil administrative, that's not necessarily true because there's no due process in administrative. Hence, that's a problem under the Bill of Rights to begin with.
[27:42.000 --> 27:56.000]  The other is, if it's criminal, then there has to be a probable cause determination, which can only be done by a neutral and detached magistrate, not the same one who's going to sit at your trial.
[27:56.000 --> 28:00.000]  So they didn't do that, but what is that going to mean now?
[28:00.000 --> 28:07.000]  Well, in New York, it depends on whether or not the particular offense is a civil infraction or a crime.
[28:07.000 --> 28:12.000]  It's a crime. I know for a fact it's a crime.
[28:12.000 --> 28:15.000]  Okay, then what are the rules of procedure in New York for trying criminal cases?
[28:15.000 --> 28:19.000]  Well, you have to have a preliminary hearing.
[28:19.000 --> 28:22.000]  Then who filed a motion to get the preliminary hearing?
[28:22.000 --> 28:24.000]  I'm sorry?
[28:24.000 --> 28:27.000]  Who filed a motion demanding a preliminary hearing?
[28:27.000 --> 28:29.000]  Nobody.
[28:29.000 --> 28:32.000]  Well, then how do you expect to get it?
[28:32.000 --> 28:35.000]  Well, we're just finding out about it now.
[28:35.000 --> 28:38.000]  Well, that's still not my question.
[28:38.000 --> 28:41.000]  How are you going to get it if you don't demand they do it?
[28:41.000 --> 28:44.000]  Never count on them to follow their rules.
[28:44.000 --> 28:48.000]  You have to insist they follow their rules.
[28:48.000 --> 29:04.000]  Instead of them doing what they're supposed to do to prosecute you, they force you to defend against presumptions and allegations that have no substantive basis on anything until they get ready to move forward beyond that,
[29:04.000 --> 29:08.000]  if and when they ever get everything ready to do that to begin with.
[29:08.000 --> 29:12.000]  Most of the time they count on you buckling long before you get to that point.
[29:12.000 --> 29:17.000]  But the fact remains that you need to read what the rules of procedure say.
[29:17.000 --> 29:20.000]  Who is required to request that hearing?
[29:20.000 --> 29:26.000]  Is it on the defense to request it or is it on the prosecution to ensure it happens?
[29:26.000 --> 29:32.000]  If you don't know the answer to that, then you're talking about something that you don't have any clue how to make work,
[29:32.000 --> 29:36.000]  and you need to go find out.
[29:36.000 --> 29:43.000]  Well, if that's the case, if they didn't have it, I always thought it was their responsibility to have it.
[29:43.000 --> 29:46.000]  Well, again, it depends upon how it's done.
[29:46.000 --> 29:48.000]  You need to read the rules of procedure.
[29:48.000 --> 29:51.000]  It will tell you.
[29:51.000 --> 29:52.000]  Okay?
[29:52.000 --> 29:53.000]  Okay.
[29:53.000 --> 29:54.000]  All right, John.
[29:54.000 --> 29:55.000]  I got a break here.
[29:55.000 --> 29:56.000]  Hold on.
[29:56.000 --> 29:57.000]  We'll be right back, folks.
[29:57.000 --> 30:01.000]  Y'all hold on.
[30:01.000 --> 30:05.000]  I only have eyes for you.
[30:05.000 --> 30:08.000]  Soon, store mannequins may be singing that tune.
[30:08.000 --> 30:12.000]  They're being outfitted with cameras to watch us while we shop.
[30:12.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details after this.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.000 --> 30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:42.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:53.000]  It's disturbing enough that big brother governments use facial recognition technology to identify and track people on the streets.
[30:53.000 --> 30:58.000]  Now clothing companies in Europe, Canada, and America are getting in on the act.
[30:58.000 --> 31:00.000]  So where do they hide the cameras?
[31:00.000 --> 31:02.000]  In the eyes of mannequins.
[31:02.000 --> 31:07.000]  That's right, those glamorous plastic ladies in the display windows may be watching you back.
[31:07.000 --> 31:13.000]  They're called eye-seers, and their job is to log the age, gender, and race of passersby,
[31:13.000 --> 31:17.000]  so retailers can devise new schemes to get you to buy.
[31:17.000 --> 31:20.000]  But hang on, aren't mannequins spooky enough already?
[31:20.000 --> 31:23.000]  This is taking weird science to a whole new level.
[31:23.000 --> 31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:37.000 --> 31:39.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:39.000 --> 31:44.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:44.000 --> 31:47.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives,
[31:47.000 --> 31:49.000]  and thousands of my fellow force responders have died.
[31:49.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:51.000 --> 31:52.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:52.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[31:53.000 --> 31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:54.000 --> 31:56.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:56.000 --> 31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:02.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in a us-against-them society,
[32:08.000 --> 32:11.000]  and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:11.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:19.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:19.000 --> 32:21.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:21.000 --> 32:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:23.000 --> 32:26.000]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:28.000]  Former sheriff's deputy, Katie Craig,
[32:28.000 --> 32:30.000]  in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:30.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:42.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:42.000 --> 32:44.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:44.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:49.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:49.000 --> 32:52.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:52.000 --> 32:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:54.000 --> 32:56.000]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:56.000 --> 32:58.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have
[32:58.000 --> 33:00.000]  the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:03.000 --> 33:08.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:08.000 --> 33:11.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:38.000 --> 33:43.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:49.000 --> 33:54.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[34:00.000 --> 34:05.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[34:05.000 --> 34:10.000]  And I'm still nothing, leave me be
[34:10.000 --> 34:14.000]  Take your love and carry it on my side
[34:14.000 --> 34:18.000]  Don't be real, don't be right
[34:18.000 --> 34:22.000]  Ain't nothing I'd rather do
[34:22.000 --> 34:26.000]  Going down for the change
[34:26.000 --> 34:31.000]  My friends are gonna see that too
[34:31.000 --> 34:36.000]  I'm gonna hide away the hell
[34:36.000 --> 34:41.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[34:41.000 --> 34:45.000]  Calling number 512-646-1984.
[34:45.000 --> 34:48.000]  Give us a call, get in line, let's talk.
[34:48.000 --> 34:51.000]  Alright, let's see. John, we need to wrap this up, man.
[34:51.000 --> 34:54.000]  What else do you have? Do you have any questions for this?
[34:54.000 --> 34:57.000]  Now, like I say, as far as what you just asked me,
[34:57.000 --> 35:01.000]  we need to read the rules of procedure and see what it says about that hearing.
[35:01.000 --> 35:04.000]  Okay, but to me, it's common sense.
[35:04.000 --> 35:07.000]  Okay, and this is not about what it is to you.
[35:07.000 --> 35:11.000]  Read the rules and see what it says.
[35:11.000 --> 35:14.000]  Well, I don't have time to go into what you think about it.
[35:14.000 --> 35:19.000]  I'm telling you what you need to do to find out for sure what to do about it.
[35:19.000 --> 35:22.000]  Then where do you look? CPL?
[35:22.000 --> 35:27.000]  As I just told you, whatever rules of procedure apply, you said they use
[35:27.000 --> 35:31.000]  criminal charges for these things in New York.
[35:31.000 --> 35:35.000]  So I would assume that would be the criminal code of procedure,
[35:35.000 --> 35:37.000]  whatever that may be called there.
[35:37.000 --> 35:41.000]  Right, CPL, yeah. Got it.
[35:41.000 --> 35:44.000]  Okay. Alright.
[35:44.000 --> 35:48.000]  And if they didn't follow it and they were supposed to,
[35:48.000 --> 35:55.000]  then you file a written objection and whatever else complaint process would be applicable.
[35:55.000 --> 35:58.000]  Motion to dismiss based on...
[35:58.000 --> 36:03.000]  You're not going to get a dismissal based upon stupidity from them unless
[36:03.000 --> 36:08.000]  they violated your rights in such a way that the harm cannot be remedied by
[36:08.000 --> 36:12.000]  assigning a different judge, rescheduling or anything like that.
[36:12.000 --> 36:16.000]  You don't automatically get a dismissal just because they screw up.
[36:16.000 --> 36:21.000]  They have to screw up in a way serious enough that that right cannot be salvaged.
[36:21.000 --> 36:27.000]  That violation cannot be remedied by any further proceeding.
[36:27.000 --> 36:30.000]  Hmm. Alright.
[36:30.000 --> 36:31.000]  I thank you.
[36:31.000 --> 36:33.000]  You're welcome.
[36:33.000 --> 36:34.000]  Have a very good day.
[36:34.000 --> 36:36.000]  You too. Thanks for calling.
[36:36.000 --> 36:39.000]  Alright. Now, what else we got here?
[36:39.000 --> 36:44.000]  Wendy in Colorado. Wendy, what can we do for you?
[36:44.000 --> 36:46.000]  Hello, Wendy.
[36:46.000 --> 36:47.000]  Hello.
[36:47.000 --> 36:48.000]  Hello.
[36:48.000 --> 36:49.000]  Hi.
[36:49.000 --> 36:51.000]  I didn't know I was on the video.
[36:51.000 --> 36:53.000]  I'm sorry. Say that again.
[36:53.000 --> 36:56.000]  I didn't know I was on. I usually don't have it.
[36:56.000 --> 37:01.000]  Okay. You got the same problem that John had there in New York.
[37:01.000 --> 37:03.000]  You need to speak directly into your phone.
[37:03.000 --> 37:07.000]  Every time you turn away from it, you get muffled and I can't understand you.
[37:07.000 --> 37:09.000]  Okay. Can you hear me better now?
[37:09.000 --> 37:11.000]  I can. What do you got?
[37:11.000 --> 37:16.000]  Okay. I just was wondering, I have a case that's been ongoing for about a year now,
[37:16.000 --> 37:21.000]  a little over a year, and it's a traffic citation I talked to you about a year ago.
[37:21.000 --> 37:26.000]  And what I have discovered is that on the papers,
[37:26.000 --> 37:30.000]  I hear echo coming from me on the phone,
[37:30.000 --> 37:37.000]  is that they have a date that's on April 29th.
[37:37.000 --> 37:39.000]  They said it was filed with the court.
[37:39.000 --> 37:47.000]  And I have another paper, the same exact citation where it says it was on March 29th.
[37:47.000 --> 37:51.000]  April 29th versus March 29th?
[37:51.000 --> 37:56.000]  29th of March versus April 23rd or something like that.
[37:56.000 --> 37:57.000]  Okay.
[37:57.000 --> 37:59.000]  They said they filed it in the court.
[37:59.000 --> 38:02.000]  They're saying they filed which document?
[38:02.000 --> 38:05.000]  The citation.
[38:05.000 --> 38:07.000]  Okay.
[38:07.000 --> 38:14.000]  So I'm wondering, wouldn't that be both fine government documents?
[38:14.000 --> 38:19.000]  Well, it depends on whether or not you can show who made the document,
[38:19.000 --> 38:22.000]  the motivation for why they made the document,
[38:22.000 --> 38:29.000]  and whether or not they intentionally misconstrued the dates for some reason.
[38:29.000 --> 38:31.000]  Well, I have...
[38:31.000 --> 38:37.000]  Here's the question you need to ask yourself and look at the rules of procedure to see the answer,
[38:37.000 --> 38:40.000]  because that's where you're going to find it if there is an answer to be had.
[38:40.000 --> 38:45.000]  What do the different dates affect?
[38:45.000 --> 38:52.000]  For instance, if they only had 15 days to file and the one date was within the 15
[38:52.000 --> 38:58.000]  and the other date was after the 15, which one is true and correct?
[38:58.000 --> 38:59.000]  Okay.
[38:59.000 --> 39:00.000]  Right.
[39:00.000 --> 39:04.000]  If so, why the two different dates?
[39:04.000 --> 39:10.000]  What did they do during the first date when the thing wasn't filed,
[39:10.000 --> 39:14.000]  if you can show that it was not actually filed at that time?
[39:14.000 --> 39:20.000]  Then you could show they falsified a document to do something they would not have been able to do
[39:20.000 --> 39:24.000]  if the document had not been properly filed.
[39:24.000 --> 39:25.000]  Correct.
[39:25.000 --> 39:26.000]  Okay.
[39:26.000 --> 39:30.000]  So that's the question you have to find the answer to.
[39:30.000 --> 39:31.000]  Well, I did...
[39:31.000 --> 39:36.000]  One of them is how I got the paperwork is I always, when I first go to court,
[39:36.000 --> 39:40.000]  I go to the court's file room and get the registered action.
[39:40.000 --> 39:44.000]  Well, I'm not saying that you just get particular paperwork.
[39:44.000 --> 39:51.000]  What I'm asking is you need to find out what the effect is on the process
[39:51.000 --> 39:55.000]  according to why someone would have given you different dates.
[39:55.000 --> 40:02.000]  And it's like I said, as an example, if they only had a certain number of days to do something
[40:02.000 --> 40:10.000]  and they had not filed that document within the time they're required by law to do,
[40:10.000 --> 40:15.000]  so they falsified a date to say it was filed when it actually wasn't.
[40:15.000 --> 40:20.000]  So they could do that thing and keep the case alive illegally.
[40:20.000 --> 40:26.000]  Documentation showing that that's what they did would be how you would prove that they violated the law
[40:26.000 --> 40:31.000]  and your right of due process by not complying with that law.
[40:31.000 --> 40:32.000]  Right.
[40:32.000 --> 40:33.000]  Okay.
[40:33.000 --> 40:34.000]  Well, they did.
[40:34.000 --> 40:35.000]  I do have the proof of that.
[40:35.000 --> 40:40.000]  Well, but you have proof that they gave you two different dates.
[40:40.000 --> 40:41.000]  You said, right?
[40:41.000 --> 40:42.000]  Correct.
[40:42.000 --> 40:43.000]  I do.
[40:43.000 --> 40:44.000]  I have both papers.
[40:44.000 --> 40:45.000]  Okay.
[40:45.000 --> 40:49.000]  Now, why does the two different dates make a difference?
[40:49.000 --> 40:55.000]  How does it affect your case one way or the other depending upon which date is applied?
[40:55.000 --> 40:59.000]  Well, because that's when the lawster was supposed to file it.
[40:59.000 --> 41:02.000]  Well, he had a certain amount of 10 days.
[41:02.000 --> 41:04.000]  Well, what do you mean he's got 10 days?
[41:04.000 --> 41:07.000]  He's got 10 days to file the case, has to be thrown out,
[41:07.000 --> 41:11.000]  or he's required to have filed it with the court within 10 days,
[41:11.000 --> 41:15.000]  but there's no penalty if it's longer.
[41:15.000 --> 41:19.000]  No, he has to be dismissed if it hasn't been filed in 10 days.
[41:19.000 --> 41:21.000]  I've had that done before.
[41:21.000 --> 41:22.000]  Okay.
[41:22.000 --> 41:28.000]  So there's a statute that specifically says if the citation has not been turned over to the court within 10 days,
[41:28.000 --> 41:37.000]  or has it been something else within 10 days, then the citation is invalid as far as the prosecution on it goes.
[41:37.000 --> 41:38.000]  Correct.
[41:38.000 --> 41:39.000]  And they dismissed the case.
[41:39.000 --> 41:40.000]  I've had that done before.
[41:40.000 --> 41:41.000]  Okay.
[41:41.000 --> 41:43.000]  So you have a statute that says that?
[41:43.000 --> 41:44.000]  Yes, I do.
[41:44.000 --> 41:50.000]  Now, does either date come within that 10 days?
[41:50.000 --> 41:52.000]  Yes, the 29th does.
[41:52.000 --> 41:53.000]  Okay.
[41:53.000 --> 41:55.000]  But the other date does not.
[41:55.000 --> 42:01.000]  So what is your evidence as to when it was actually filed?
[42:01.000 --> 42:04.000]  I have the one paper that says April 20, whatever,
[42:04.000 --> 42:08.000]  and then I have another document from the court say the 29th.
[42:08.000 --> 42:12.000]  Yeah, but you've got two documents from the court, right?
[42:12.000 --> 42:13.000]  Correct.
[42:13.000 --> 42:14.000]  Okay.
[42:14.000 --> 42:21.000]  So that's still not helping you unless both of those dates are beyond that 10-day limit.
[42:21.000 --> 42:23.000]  Are they?
[42:23.000 --> 42:24.000]  No.
[42:24.000 --> 42:25.000]  Okay.
[42:25.000 --> 42:34.000]  Then my question is, is which one of those documents proves when the citation was actually turned over to the court?
[42:34.000 --> 42:37.000]  Because right now what you've got is two conflicting documents.
[42:37.000 --> 42:49.000]  But what I'm not hearing you tell me is that one document is definite proof that the citation was turned in at a later date than what you were told and what the other document says.
[42:49.000 --> 42:59.000]  Because when I filed for a discovery and wanted the documents, I didn't get them until eight months later when I had an attorney that they sent that to the court.
[42:59.000 --> 43:03.000]  That's still not proof that they missed, that they filed it on an incorrect date.
[43:03.000 --> 43:13.000]  That's proof that they didn't give the discovery they required to give you when they should have, but it doesn't do anything to prove your date problem.
[43:13.000 --> 43:15.000]  Why would they have two different dates?
[43:15.000 --> 43:18.000]  Well, you're asking me to read minds and I don't do that.
[43:18.000 --> 43:21.000]  This is Eddie Craig, not Kreskin.
[43:21.000 --> 43:23.000]  Eddie, I understand that.
[43:23.000 --> 43:27.000]  Okay, but you need to listen to what I'm saying here.
[43:27.000 --> 43:34.000]  The fact that they didn't supply your discovery is not proof that the citation was not filed.
[43:34.000 --> 43:43.000]  It just means they didn't comply with your discovery in a timely manner, which you should complain about to the judge and ask for sanctions about.
[43:43.000 --> 43:45.000]  But hang on just a second.
[43:45.000 --> 43:47.000]  We'll pick that up on the other side of the break.
[43:47.000 --> 43:48.000]  Okay?
[43:48.000 --> 43:49.000]  All right, folks.
[43:49.000 --> 43:51.000]  512-646-1984.
[43:51.000 --> 43:53.000]  Y'all call in, get in line.
[43:53.000 --> 44:00.000]  We will be right back.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro-sac tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 44:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:56.000 --> 45:01.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Hello.
[45:04.000 --> 45:13.000]  My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas,
[45:13.000 --> 45:19.000]  find brave new books, and chase back to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:24.000]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:24.000 --> 45:31.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:39.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:39.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 45:51.000]  naturespureorganics.com.
[46:18.000 --> 46:41.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio calling 512-646-1984, and we are talking to Wendy in Colorado.
[46:41.000 --> 46:49.000]  Alright Wendy.
[46:49.000 --> 46:54.000]  Well, the thing is, is any document that goes into the court should have a file stamp on it?
[46:54.000 --> 46:58.000]  That's what, they're both file stamped, that's what I'm saying.
[46:58.000 --> 47:02.000]  Well, but when was the citation file stamped?
[47:02.000 --> 47:09.000]  If the citation was turned into the court, it should have been stamped by the court as received on a certain date.
[47:09.000 --> 47:13.000]  That's, I have two documents that say that. One says April and one says...
[47:13.000 --> 47:18.000]  No. You have, are both of these documents citations?
[47:18.000 --> 47:27.000]  It's a same citation. Yes, the exact same citation. It's the, they look exactly the same except the file stamp is different.
[47:27.000 --> 47:28.000]  Okay.
[47:28.000 --> 47:30.000]  That's what I'm saying.
[47:30.000 --> 47:34.000]  Do they match the copy that was given to you?
[47:34.000 --> 47:44.000]  Yes, it does. But you can tell on the March 29th it looks a little different like it's been messed with, but they are the exact same document.
[47:44.000 --> 47:46.000]  It's the citation of the court.
[47:46.000 --> 47:55.000]  Okay, wait, wait, wait. If it looks different, it's not the exact same document. You're confusing me when you say that.
[47:55.000 --> 48:06.000]  If there's something different about the earlier one, okay, what is it?
[48:06.000 --> 48:12.000]  It's, the only thing that's different is the time stamp. One's got a bigger time stamp on it.
[48:12.000 --> 48:21.000]  So other than the time stamp, it's absolutely identical right down to the officer's signature, the placement of all the writing, everything.
[48:21.000 --> 48:22.000]  Everything.
[48:22.000 --> 48:28.000]  Okay, then how are you going to make the argument he didn't file it timely?
[48:28.000 --> 48:42.000]  The fact that they stamp the same one twice doesn't, is irrelevant if they've actually got a copy that shows it was properly stamped in within the required number of days.
[48:42.000 --> 48:46.000]  Because it's obvious that somebody changed something.
[48:46.000 --> 48:53.000]  Well, no, they could have simply handed in another copy and stamped it again.
[48:53.000 --> 49:10.000]  If the copy you have of your own that was given to you by the cop is a dead ringer match except for those file stamps for the other two copies you're talking about, then that is a reasonable explanation for what has happened.
[49:10.000 --> 49:16.000]  They didn't stamp the cop's original copy, they stamped the copy he turned into the court.
[49:16.000 --> 49:26.000]  One of which was done within the required amount of time and there for some reason he thought he may not have done it and turned in another copy.
[49:26.000 --> 49:28.000]  That would have been too late.
[49:28.000 --> 49:34.000]  No, not if he's already done it within the proper time.
[49:34.000 --> 49:44.000]  If you only had the April document and not the March document, then you would have an argument it's not timely.
[49:44.000 --> 49:56.000]  If you could argue that the March document and the April document are not identical, you might have to the copy that was given to you, then you might have an issue there to raise.
[49:56.000 --> 50:07.000]  But what you're telling me, you don't have one because there's a reasonable explanation that does not run a file of the 10 days.
[50:07.000 --> 50:09.000]  Okay, I have another question then.
[50:09.000 --> 50:10.000]  Okay.
[50:10.000 --> 50:17.000]  I filed a Speedy Trial Act because it's been over a year.
[50:17.000 --> 50:21.000]  You filed a motion for Speedy Trial under the Speedy Trial Act.
[50:21.000 --> 50:22.000]  Correct.
[50:22.000 --> 50:23.000]  Okay.
[50:23.000 --> 50:30.000]  And the judge, without any explanation or anything, he denied it, but he didn't deny it until a month later.
[50:30.000 --> 50:36.000]  How long in Colorado do they have to bring these to trial?
[50:36.000 --> 50:37.000]  Seventy days.
[50:37.000 --> 50:39.000]  Seventy days?
[50:39.000 --> 50:40.000]  Yes.
[50:40.000 --> 50:41.000]  Okay.
[50:41.000 --> 50:46.000]  As long as I didn't ask for any kind of discovery or, you know...
[50:46.000 --> 50:48.000]  Okay, but you did ask for discovery.
[50:48.000 --> 50:50.000]  You said you did.
[50:50.000 --> 50:58.000]  I did ask for discovery, but they told me in their response that I had to get paperwork from the...
[50:58.000 --> 51:02.000]  They said no action was taken on there.
[51:02.000 --> 51:04.000]  That's what they ordered.
[51:04.000 --> 51:09.000]  No action taken that I have to go to the prosecutor and get the paperwork.
[51:09.000 --> 51:10.000]  So I may have to...
[51:10.000 --> 51:13.000]  Who did you file your motion of discovery with?
[51:13.000 --> 51:14.000]  The court clerk.
[51:14.000 --> 51:18.000]  Why would you file a motion for discovery with the court clerk?
[51:18.000 --> 51:26.000]  I mean, filing a copy for the record is fine, but who were you asking for the discovery from?
[51:26.000 --> 51:28.000]  From the prosecutor.
[51:28.000 --> 51:31.000]  Did you send a copy to the prosecutor?
[51:31.000 --> 51:32.000]  I did.
[51:32.000 --> 51:38.000]  And the prosecutor didn't take any action on it, or the court didn't take any action on it?
[51:38.000 --> 51:40.000]  They wrote on the paperwork that they...
[51:40.000 --> 51:41.000]  Who's they?
[51:41.000 --> 51:52.000]  The judge, the register of actions that I got, and they sent me also through the mail a copy saying no action taken that I could call the prosecuting...
[51:52.000 --> 51:56.000]  But you filed a copy with the prosecutor who didn't do anything.
[51:56.000 --> 51:57.000]  Correct.
[51:57.000 --> 52:02.000]  Then you need to file sanctions with the judge, and the judge should know that you...
[52:02.000 --> 52:10.000]  Unless you specifically told them you were looking for discovery from the court, which you can't do, by the way,
[52:10.000 --> 52:14.000]  which would be why they denied it as far as their presumption that maybe what's going on.
[52:14.000 --> 52:22.000]  But if they didn't have any reason to believe that's what you were asking them to do, then this was just the judge trying to run rings around you and pull your chain,
[52:22.000 --> 52:29.000]  which means you need to go after the judge with a complaint to begin with for judicial misconduct, just for the hell of it.
[52:29.000 --> 52:31.000]  But...
[52:31.000 --> 52:34.000]  And also, he's denying everything that I file.
[52:34.000 --> 52:40.000]  Like the speedy trial act, the prosecutor's not even being involved when he's the one supposed to be...
[52:40.000 --> 52:52.000]  Well, again, you just said that if you file a motion for discovery, then a motion for speedy trial can be denied because of the timeline for the discovery.
[52:52.000 --> 52:54.000]  Right?
[52:54.000 --> 52:57.000]  Right, but they denied that, Eddie.
[52:57.000 --> 52:59.000]  They denied what?
[52:59.000 --> 53:03.000]  The discovery they said that I'd have.
[53:03.000 --> 53:06.000]  No, the court said we're not going to give you discovery.
[53:06.000 --> 53:09.000]  That's why they took no action.
[53:09.000 --> 53:17.000]  But what did you do to complain about the prosecutor not doing what they were supposed to do with the motion for discovery?
[53:17.000 --> 53:22.000]  I finally hired an attorney and they scanned in the discovery.
[53:22.000 --> 53:23.000]  Okay.
[53:23.000 --> 53:25.000]  Ten months later.
[53:25.000 --> 53:27.000]  Ten months?
[53:27.000 --> 53:28.000]  Ten months.
[53:28.000 --> 53:35.000]  When I talked to my attorney when I hired him, he said, this has been going on for ten months, and I said, yes.
[53:35.000 --> 53:37.000]  And then he also...
[53:37.000 --> 53:40.000]  Okay, then here's the thing.
[53:40.000 --> 53:45.000]  How long do they have to respond to a discovery request in Colorado?
[53:45.000 --> 53:46.000]  I don't know.
[53:46.000 --> 53:54.000]  Well, you need to find out because that's going to be the basis of your judicial conduct complaint against the judge and the bargain against the prosecutor.
[53:54.000 --> 53:55.000]  Okay.
[53:55.000 --> 53:56.000]  Okay.
[53:56.000 --> 53:59.000]  So now you're going to move to dismiss.
[53:59.000 --> 54:06.000]  You're going to move to dismiss for failure to provide a speedy trial unless you're still having an attorney who's not going to do that.
[54:06.000 --> 54:09.000]  No, I had an attorney and he wouldn't do anything from me.
[54:09.000 --> 54:16.000]  He tried to get a 20-year-old DUI put back in my record so I could get an interlock on my car.
[54:16.000 --> 54:18.000]  And they wouldn't do it.
[54:18.000 --> 54:22.000]  This attorney that filed the discovery did that?
[54:22.000 --> 54:25.000]  The attorney that I hired.
[54:25.000 --> 54:28.000]  He tried to get a 20-year-old DUI put back on my case.
[54:28.000 --> 54:30.000]  You need to sue him for legal malpractice.
[54:30.000 --> 54:33.000]  He's not supposed to work against you like that.
[54:33.000 --> 54:34.000]  I...
[54:34.000 --> 54:36.000]  But anyway...
[54:36.000 --> 54:38.000]  I'm just keeping out of jail.
[54:38.000 --> 54:40.000]  Let's get back on track here what we're talking about.
[54:40.000 --> 54:45.000]  You need to file a motion demanding dismissal for failure to provide a speedy trial.
[54:45.000 --> 54:57.000]  But you've already filed a speedy trial motion. The judge has no cause to deny it if the prosecution is delaying the case by refusing to comply with a proper motion for discovery.
[54:57.000 --> 55:03.000]  There's no reason why discovery in a case for a traffic ticket should have taken 10 months or a year.
[55:03.000 --> 55:04.000]  Thank you.
[55:04.000 --> 55:05.000]  Okay?
[55:05.000 --> 55:16.000]  Do that in ASAP. Forward a copy of that motion to the head administrative judge for the region or district or however they divide the administrative judge is up in Colorado.
[55:16.000 --> 55:27.000]  And demand that they investigate this judge and his prosecutor for delaying trials and intentionally depriving people of due process.
[55:27.000 --> 55:28.000]  Okay.
[55:28.000 --> 55:38.000]  And put a copy of his denial of your motion for speedy trial as well as a copy of your motion for discovery in what you send to that administrative judge.
[55:38.000 --> 55:46.000]  Now, I also have a proof that he's falsifying saying that he gave me an arraignment or a pretrial conference when he didn't.
[55:46.000 --> 55:50.000]  And I have the transcript of that. It was about three minutes.
[55:50.000 --> 55:55.000]  And it was just over me, the lawyer that I had withdrawing.
[55:55.000 --> 56:02.000]  Describe that and send a copy of that and the audio recording to the head administrative judge.
[56:02.000 --> 56:03.000]  Okay.
[56:03.000 --> 56:04.000]  I have to do that in two days.
[56:04.000 --> 56:08.000]  Now, Colorado is a one-party state, right?
[56:08.000 --> 56:09.000]  I have a review.
[56:09.000 --> 56:15.000]  When it comes to recording conversations, Colorado is a one-party state, yes or no?
[56:15.000 --> 56:16.000]  Yes, I believe so.
[56:16.000 --> 56:23.000]  Well, you better do more than believe. You better be really sure because the last thing in the world you want to get hit with a wiretap in charge.
[56:23.000 --> 56:24.000]  Okay.
[56:24.000 --> 56:25.000]  Well, I'll talk to you then.
[56:25.000 --> 56:26.000]  Okay.
[56:26.000 --> 56:27.000]  Okay.
[56:27.000 --> 56:28.000]  Thank you.
[56:28.000 --> 56:29.000]  You're welcome.
[56:29.000 --> 56:30.000]  Bye.
[56:30.000 --> 56:31.000]  Bye-bye.
[56:31.000 --> 56:32.000]  You have a good night.
[56:32.000 --> 56:33.000]  All right.
[56:33.000 --> 56:35.000]  Now, we have Tina in California.
[56:35.000 --> 56:38.000]  Tina, what can we do for you?
[56:38.000 --> 56:40.000]  Hi.
[56:40.000 --> 56:45.000]  Let me turn off the D2 so you see.
[56:45.000 --> 56:47.000]  Can you hear me well?
[56:47.000 --> 56:51.000]  I can hear you as long as you're talking to the phone or headset or whatever, yes.
[56:51.000 --> 56:52.000]  Okay.
[56:52.000 --> 57:01.000]  Speaking a little bit about what you were saying about having a next friend and a right to your own counsel, I have a list.
[57:01.000 --> 57:02.000]  Well, now, that's not what I said.
[57:02.000 --> 57:04.000]  I said you have the right of counsel.
[57:04.000 --> 57:08.000]  They're even denying you an attorney in Texas for these things.
[57:08.000 --> 57:10.000]  But go ahead.
[57:10.000 --> 57:21.000]  There's actual federal law and the Supreme Court cases that say it's a right of counsel, right to counsel of choice, non-attorney.
[57:21.000 --> 57:23.000]  Yeah, I'm familiar with most of those cases.
[57:23.000 --> 57:25.000]  The Supreme Court.
[57:25.000 --> 57:26.000]  Okay.
[57:26.000 --> 57:34.000]  So, I just wanted to see if there was any that you might not have heard because it's a Supreme Court case.
[57:34.000 --> 57:50.000]  It covers all the states except that in my state, California, my former attorney for a enclosure case said that California does not have to follow the Supreme Court rules.
[57:50.000 --> 57:55.000]  Well, your attorney is an idiot.
[57:55.000 --> 58:07.000]  But in any case, if you want to send me those just to make sure I've got all the correct cases that you're talking about, then just send them to eddydde.atruleoflawradio.com.
[58:07.000 --> 58:12.000]  If you've got links to them on Google Scholar or something like that, even better.
[58:12.000 --> 58:16.000]  I've got a sheet from a forensic advocate.
[58:16.000 --> 58:17.000]  Okay.
[58:17.000 --> 58:20.000]  I have for you, and hopefully you might know the answer.
[58:20.000 --> 58:21.000]  Okay.
[58:21.000 --> 58:26.000]  Well, Tina, I've got a break to take, and then when I get back on the other side of the break, I'll take your question, okay?
[58:26.000 --> 58:27.000]  Great.
[58:27.000 --> 58:28.000]  All right.
[58:28.000 --> 58:29.000]  Hang on just a few minutes.
[58:29.000 --> 58:30.000]  All right, folks.
[58:30.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back when it's over.
[58:50.000 --> 58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:06.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:27.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.000 --> 59:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.000 --> 59:47.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.000 --> 59:50.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:23.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli bulletins for the commodity market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Markets for the 11th of April, 2018, closed with gold $1,353.22-nounds, silver $16.68-nounds, Texas crude $65.51-a-barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum's at $420.80, bitcoin cash is at $652.90, and finally litecoins at $114.34-a-cryptocoin.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:01:08.000]  Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  Today in History.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured.
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  An attack which is being blamed on the democratically elected President of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as of yet.
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new and smart.
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who kills its people and enjoys it.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments,
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:33.000]  with ISIS being one of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:45.000]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which has been fighting terrorists.
[01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:54.000]  Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:02.000]  This was quick roadie with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:02.000 --> 01:03:13.000]  We'll make our own whiskey and our own smoke, too. Ain't too many things these old boys can't do.
[01:03:13.000 --> 01:03:20.000]  We'll grow good old tomatoes and homemade wine, and the country folks can survive.
[01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:27.000]  Country folks can survive.
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  Because you can't survive, and you can't make a run, because wasn't the old boys raised on shotguns.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:45.000]  We say praise, we say man, but you ain't in the best, but don't give a damn.
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  We came from the West Virginia coal mine.
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:04:00.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We got one more hour on the show, 512-646-1984, and we are talking to Tina in California.
[01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:04.000]  All right, Tina, let's see if we can wrap this up for you. What's your question?
[01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  If a judge does not actually sign his order with a signature, and it's just got a stamp of the clerk, not a signature of the clerk, is it a valid order?
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:25.000]  It depends on what the order is and what type of court it is and what the case law says about it.
[01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  Generally speaking, unless the statute says that an order is directly says an order is invalid if not signed, then the courts will say that the judge's intent is enough.
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  Now, that's not right in my book, but it's how a lot of them operate regardless.
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  I mean, that's like saying, the judge issued a warrant. It didn't sign it, but the intent that he issued it was enough to make it valid. That's baloney.
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  But at the same time, they're doing it with orders left and right.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  So one, what does the rules and procedures say about orders signed or unsigned?
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  What does the courts say about orders that are signed or unsigned by particular types of judges slash commissioners in certain kinds of courts?
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  That's what you've got to find out.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  So the 28 U.S. Code 1691.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Is this a federal judge?
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:23.000]  A federal and state have had.
[01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  Okay. You can apply the federal rule to a state judge.
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  You can apply the federal rule to a state judge if there are state rules governing the subject.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  The only time you're going to be able to do that is if it's a federal case and then the state judge wouldn't be handling it anyway.
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:44.000]  If I had a federal judge that did not sign his order.
[01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:52.000]  Again, same issue. What do the federal rules of procedures say the judge has to do in relation to an order?
[01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:58.000]  There's a reason the state and the fed are not synonymous in what they're required to do.
[01:05:58.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  So if you're having issues with multiple judges at multiple levels, then you need to read the rules of procedure at each of those levels.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  And you need to read the case law at each of those levels in relation to the signing of orders.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:22.000]  You may even want to look and see if the United States Supreme Court says no court order is valid if not signed, whether state or federal.
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  Okay. I'll do that. I'll start looking.
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  Okay.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:30.000]  Okay. Thank you.
[01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  You're very welcome. Thanks for calling.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  All right. Now we have Charles in Texas. Charles, what do you got?
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  A friend of mine has got a red lock ticket and it first was sent to her dad in Arizona.
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:55.000]  Now it turns around the state sent her the exact same ticket, including the ticket number under her name and her address.
[01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  And where does she live?
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  No.
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  In here in Texas.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:02.000]  Okay.
[01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:04.000]  So what's your question?
[01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  Well, now she has, her dad had responded to the letter.
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  No, we used your red light ticket letter.
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  Uh-huh.
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  And that's when they responded with sending the ticket back out under her name with the same citation number and everything.
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:27.000]  Okay. Still use the letter. What's the problem?
[01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  He just wants to know if that's legal and if it's not.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:33.000]  If what's legal?
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  For them to send out the same citation first to her dad.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  It's not legal for them to send out a citation, period.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  Texas law is very clear that if they want to collect on a citation, they're required to file a civil lawsuit to collect.
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  They don't do that.
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  They're counting on you to simply comply with the illegal citation they issue.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:55.000]  Here's the deal.
[01:07:55.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  In Texas, that citation constitutes a felony.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:05.000]  Why? Because there's no authority for it under the red light camera statutes to begin with.
[01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  That's problem number one.
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:11.000]  Problem number two, it's called simulation of legal process.
[01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  It is completely illegal under Texas law to send a document to someone telling them that they must comply with the document or suffer some punitive action for their failure to comply.
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  When that document is not issued by a constitutionally established court of this state and not authorized by law, and it's not.
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  So you need to file a criminal complaint against whoever's information is on that red light camera letter.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  Okay.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:45.000]  File it with your county or district attorney.
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  Count on them doing absolutely nothing.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  Take the complaints to a magistrate.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  Count on them doing absolutely nothing.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  Write the same criminal complaints against the county or district attorney that refused and against the magistrate that refused.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:06.000]  And take the original one along with those two new ones and file them all with the grand jury.
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  Okay.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  That's number one.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  Number two, send out the red light camera letter again with your friend's name and information on it.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  And let them know that you are filing criminal charges against whoever issued that citation for violations of Texas law and simulating legal process.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  That's what I was trying to do because she's working right now, so she's listening to us, but she wanted to hear from you and make sure I heard it right.
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:44.000]  Well, if that's what you told her, you had it right.
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:46.000]  That's what I told her.
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:51.000]  That's what I told her to do and I'll meet with her tomorrow and make sure she has her letters written up and ready to go.
[01:09:51.000 --> 01:10:00.000]  She's also sent them certified mail because I told her make sure you have a receipt that they received those letters and who received them at those locations.
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  Yep.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  So I'm just making sure she was covered on all basis and making sure we are good to go.
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  Yep, that'll do it.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  All right, well, thank you for letting her know and we'll call her back to you later.
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:18.000]  All right, Charles.
[01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  You have a good evening.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  Thanks for calling.
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:22.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  All right, now we have James in Texas.
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  James, what can we do for you?
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  Well, let's see.
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:40.000]  I guess I've got, I don't know what it is tomorrow.
[01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  Yeah, hearings motion.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  A hearings motion?
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  A motions hearing?
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  A motion hearing?
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  Sorry.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  Okay.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  You know, I got a letter from the court saying, I mean, it's a nice little invitation, but the letter didn't notify me that I need to pre-trial hearing.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:11.000]  And I'm supposed to bring all documents and evidence.
[01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  What is the charge?
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  With me.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  I've got two speeding charges.
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  I've talked to you before.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  But my point is really, I'm supposed to give the prosecutor a sneak peek at what I'm going to present.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  Well, you're going to do that when you file your motions anyway.
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  But as far as evidence goes, they're saying that if you're going to bring any evidence to bear on the issue, then you better bring it with you tomorrow.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  You still have to get it in, but...
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  Well, I didn't know I had to...
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  So what that sounds like to me is one or two things is happening tomorrow.
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  Either they're actually going to conduct an examining trial, which is what they're required to do, but never do, or they're taking you directly to trial.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  Okay.
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  Well, I'm going to have a jury trial, so...
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:11.000]  Tomorrow?
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  Well, no, but I'm going to...
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  Well, but that's what I'm telling you.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  There's only two reasons they would tell you to bring evidence.
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  They're either going to conduct an examining trial, which they don't ever do, or they're going to take you directly to trial.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:31.000]  Gotcha.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:38.000]  So what you're expecting and what may happen may not be the same thing.
[01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  Why do you think I'm calling you?
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  You know, what's crazy, the first time I went in and met with the judge, we had a very adversarial conversation.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  Okay.
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  When I went in, he would not enter my motions into the record, wouldn't stamp my copy so that I had proof that I feared.
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  He told me he would take them under consideration and get them to the county attorney.
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  When I went in a week later to check the court record, I still not got a copy of the complaint.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  Okay.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  And I got the citation June 7th.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  Is this a JP or municipal court?
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  JP.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:37.000]  Okay.
[01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  And it was a totally different conversation the second time.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  We had a perfectly, look, we could have been best friends.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:52.000]  He did everything to get down on us and he even kissed my butt.
[01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  I'm just telling you.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:06.000]  I'm sure he went to the county attorney, cussing me like I was cussing him for a week, told him what he did,
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  and the county attorney probably told him he stepped off into a deep pile of caca up his neck.
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  Yes, he did because what he did was actually block your access to the courts, which is illegal.
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:22.000]  Yes.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  And so now when I go in there, they, you know, he's telling me when I went in the second time,
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:41.000]  he heard my voice came out and told me, you know, hey, we'll enter your motions in the record.
[01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  I'll run a copy for the prosecutor.
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  I said, you don't have to do that.
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  I'll provide a copy for the prosecutor and I just want my copy stamped.
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  And so I go in because I got a second speaking ticket in the meantime and in between time.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  And they enter, you know, a copy into the record.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  They stamped one for the prosecutor's stamp, two copies for me.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:27.000]  And I'm sure that's what the county attorney's trying to hit off with this, all pressure and all that.
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  But anyway, I've got a motion hearing tomorrow and I'm going in and I'm supposed to bring all my evidence.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  And that's what I was wondering.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  Well, you don't have any evidence unless they're talking about some criminal complaint you're making against someone else.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  But as far as what they've got, the statute is your evidence as to what they're doing wrong.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  Well, 708.105.
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  Right.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  That's the statute.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:02.000]  That's what I'm saying.
[01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  Right.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:06.000]  And but.
[01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  Don't forget 601.053.
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:18.000]  I think I actually looked at one up to.
[01:16:18.000 --> 01:16:25.000]  But um.
[01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:30.000]  You know, I've got PRR's back from DPS.
[01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  He's never been through the training.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  There's a surprise.
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  Yeah.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  Okay, so there's what they're talking about in the form of evidence you're going to need to get all that kicked out.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  Hang on just a second, James, and let me get this break done and we'll give back, okay?
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Y'all hang on.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:17:03.000]  We will be right back after this break.
[01:17:03.000 --> 01:17:11.000]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:25.000]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:28.000]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:38.000]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:02.000]  I love Logos.
[01:18:02.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:08.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:08.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  I need my truth pick.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:14.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite.
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  And I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:23.000]  How can I help Logos?
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:30.000]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:30.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  Check on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:45.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  No.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:49.000]  No.
[01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:50.000]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  No.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  Now, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:18:58.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:58.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  We are Logos.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:23.000]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:32.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:34.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:34.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  We are 45 minutes left in this year's show, so we'll see what we can do with the time we got left.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:42.000]  We are talking to James in Texas.
[01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:44.000]  All right, James, continue.
[01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:54.000]  I was trying to hurry up and get down.
[01:19:54.000 --> 01:20:10.000]  I've sent in public information requests for fed reports, videos, all that stuff, along with the training for the deputy to Angelina County.
[01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  It's not something that's Saturday.
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  They're actually sending, I guess, I don't know what you call it, a request to the Texas Attorney General asking if they can turn that stuff over.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  You run a file of one of the bureaucrats in there that doesn't want to give you information that's a matter of public record.
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:50.000]  Every little troop of DPS agents has an information officer that picks and chooses what they do.
[01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  There are those that know that 99% of the stuff they have, they have to divulge and can't even make a request to the AG without it being a legal delay.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  Then you have those that think they can do whatever they want, so unfortunately you seem to have run a file of one of those.
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:18.000]  Well, this was sent to Angelina County for hears the deputies and the videos.
[01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  I got something back from DPS actually and saying he's not certified or anything.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  Okay, well now here's the thing though, real quick before we get to the point where we forget to talk about this.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  The statutes and everything you're going to use, you need to make sure the court accepts them by saying I've moved the court to take judicial notice.
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  However, I recommend you do that in writing if you haven't.
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  Yeah, but do I do that?
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  And that was one of my questions I wanted to ask tonight.
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:01.000]  Do I give judicial notice of different statutes?
[01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:07.000]  You give judicial notice as you're about to enter into whatever you're doing to talk about that statute.
[01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  I move the court to take judicial notices of seven on one point, whatever.
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  Okay, so it's a motion.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  Yeah, I move the court to take judicial notice.
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:23.000]  That's exactly what it is, which is also the reason why I suggest you do it in writing to make a record.
[01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:25.000]  Yeah, exactly.
[01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  That was one of my questions.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  Yeah, you make a separate one for each statute you're going to be discussing.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  Separate judicial notice.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  I can't do one for four or five statutes.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  No, do a separate judicial notice for each statute.
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  Make sure you reference the rules of procedure, the civil rules of procedure on judicial conduct, which is rule 12, something I think, or I'm sorry, judicial notice.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:00.000]  Okay.
[01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  It's either 12 or 16 under the civil rules of procedure.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  But whichever one it is that deals with judicial notice, make sure you cite that stating that the court is required to accept that notice when asked.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  Because nine times out of 10, they'll try to refuse to accept the judicial notice just so you can't get it in.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  Hence the reason why I say do it in writing.
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  Yes, well, and I actually talked to Randy a week ago or so trying to figure out how to do that.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  What do you mean how to do that?
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  But judicial notice to writing.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:48.000]  I didn't know if it had to be done in a motion or what?
[01:23:48.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  You can do it orally, but there's no record in a court of no record that you did that.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  Got you.
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:03.000]  And my point was I wanted to know how to do it in writing, and that's why I wanted to ask you.
[01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  You basically, you basically assert, just break it up, the document up in the different sections.
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:19.000]  One is moving the court for judicial notice of whatever statute and then a legal basis and then a summary of argument.
[01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  That's the way I would do it.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:26.000]  Got you.
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  All right, and the only other thing I've got, constitutional, I mean, constitutional challenge motion.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:42.000]  Yeah, I'm still working on it.
[01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  Like I said, that motion is huge.
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  It is huge.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  But because it's a jurisdictional challenge, it doesn't matter if you file it tomorrow.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  You still got any time you want to file it, you can file it as long as it's before trial.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  I got you.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  Anyway, next thing, I'm going to be down there in about two weeks.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:03.000]  Okay.
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  They're trying to bring you this food in.
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  I'm going to bring you some purple hulls, some sausage.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  Okay.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  Well, you've got my cell phone number, right?
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  No, no.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  I do not.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:16.000]  Okay.
[01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  Send me an email and I will get it back to you that way.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  I don't give out my cell on the air.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  Well, yeah, I can understand that.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  And I want to abuse it.
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  I just want to help out all I can.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  Well, I appreciate that.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  Yeah.
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:42.000]  If you'll give me your, you know, email, I mean, cell number, I will let you know when I'm down there.
[01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:49.000]  My daughter's, one of my daughters is moving down there in about two weeks and I'm going to have her move down.
[01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  I want to bring it to you and make you, we'll go get dinner or whatever.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  Okay.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  Well, yeah, just send me an email to eddyddieatruleoflawradio.com and, you know, just put something in the subject that will jump out at me.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  So am I supposed to cuss you or what?
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  Well, hey, Eddie, we talked on Monday night.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  I'm kidding.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  I'm kidding.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  Or something like, hey, A-hole, I'm coming to town, you know, something.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  No, I'm not going to do that.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  But no, I'll get something to you and I appreciate the help and we're going to see what's going on tomorrow.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  All right.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:36.000]  Well, good luck.
[01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  Stand strong and don't let them get one over on you because they will certainly try.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  Odds are, if they're doing what they're doing, they're going to be trying to double team you, which you need to make sure that you object to anything they do where it looks like somebody's not playing fair.
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  Well, even if you don't realize why, if it seems off, it most likely is.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Well, like I said, you know, we had two completely different conversations from the first time I went in to the second.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  Yeah, but that's a different than when they're sitting in that courtroom working together against you.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  Well, I'm going to have at least two people there watching.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:17.000]  Okay.
[01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  It'd be really interesting to see if the judge tries to kick them out.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  Well, they should, just based on the statute.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  They should what?
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  You know?
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  No, no, you meant kick the witnesses out.
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  Right.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  Sorry.
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  I thought you meant dismiss the...
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  They should do that too, but I wouldn't bank on it right off the bat.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  They're going to test you tomorrow to see how familiar you are with what you filed.
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  I figured that.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:52.000]  Okay.
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  So the better you are at citing those statutes correctly when asked without even looking at the paperwork, the better.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  Got you.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:04.000]  Okay.
[01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  Well, like I said, send me an email.
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:09.000]  I'll get that number to you and we'll go from there.
[01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  Okay.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:11.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:13.000]  This is my first attempt.
[01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  I've had a bloody nose many times in my life.
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  We'll see what goes on.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  Well, I'm going to be rooting for you and I'm sure you'll do fine, but let's find out what happens.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  Alrighty.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:28.000]  All right.
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  Thanks, James.
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:30.000]  All right.
[01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  All right.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:33.000]  All right.
[01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  Now we have Eric in California.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  Eric, what do you got?
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  Howdy.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:41.000]  Are you okay?
[01:28:41.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  I can hear you except for when you've got some sort of electronic echo like you're keying a microphone.
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  Okay.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  I want to start in here.
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  Sorry about that.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  Is that better?
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:28:57.000]  Much better.
[01:28:57.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  Okay.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  Great.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  I've got overdue registration now for a month and they got a letter from the DMV saying that
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:12.000]  the franchise tax board is potentially going to come after my real property.
[01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  My bank accounts, we start seizing the money that I supposedly owe them for the registration.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  Registration of what?
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:21.000]  What do I go about?
[01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  Oh, my car.
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  Okay.
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  I've sent a couple of letters to the DMV trying to get it deregistered saying why and they
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:31.000]  denied the first request.
[01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  I haven't heard back from the second one.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  It's been a couple of weeks and I just got this from the mail.
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  What, since it's all administrative.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  Okay.
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  Well, hang on just a second, Eric.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  I got a break.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Let me get that and then I'll come back to you.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Okay.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  All right, folks.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio's Monday Night Show.
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  We've got a half an hour left so y'all hang on and we'll be right back to finish all this
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  up as best we can.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:08.000]  In Wisconsin, an elderly woman who housed orphans was about to lose her home to foreclosure when
[01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  her 12-year-old grandson came to the rescue.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, back with the story of Noah the Dreamcatcher after this.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:28.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Privacy.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  Start over with Start Page.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:49.000]  For years, Janice Sparhawk cared for dozens of orphans.
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  Many dropped under doorstep after dark, but at 72, she was in trouble.
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:31:00.000]  Her health failing, she couldn't pay the mortgage unless she found $10,000 the bank would foreclose.
[01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  She appealed to her congressman, her governor, and even the president, but it was her grandson
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:07.000]  Noah who saved the day.
[01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  The 12-year-old posted her story on a website he created three years earlier, Noah's Dreamcatcher
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  network, to help hurricane victims.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  Within days, enough money had poured in to rescue Sparhawk, her foster kids, and their
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  faith in America.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:32.000]  I lost my son.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:33.000]  My nephew.
[01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:34.000]  My uncle.
[01:31:34.000 --> 01:31:35.000]  My son.
[01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  On September 11, 2000.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  The official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  to the story.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  Bring justice to my son.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  My uncle.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  My nephew.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  My son.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  Go to buildingwatch.org.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:07.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:13.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails.
[01:32:13.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  But I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:19.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  zero complaints.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:33.000]  first time.
[01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:44.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  I may not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:47.000]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:52.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  I'm going to try to get to everybody I've got here and see if I can make it by that deadline.
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  Alright Eric, please continue.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  Alright, so the notice I got here is from the DMV of California and it's talking about
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  how the franchise tax board is going to potentially garnish my wages, my real property, bank account,
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:23.000]  whatever it is that they can go after to collect the registration fees for my alleged motor vehicle.
[01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  And I don't want to register it. What's your advice?
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  Well, what I suggest you do is send me an email.
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  Let me put you in touch with my friend Kevin Michaels out there.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:40.000]  He goes toe-to-toe with the franchise tax board and helping people do that all the time.
[01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  So he would be the best resource in your area to help you do that.
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  I can't tell you what he will tell you to do. I can't tell you what it would be.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:58.000]  You have to set up with him in order to get help, but that's between the two of y'all.
[01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  But if anyone out there knows how to do what you need to do, he's going to be the guy.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:13.000]  Okay. Real quick, before you were talking about a good way to de-register your car as it goes through the state,
[01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  whether the comptroller or the secretary of state, you have the secretary of state to do a lean and title search against the car,
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  telling them that you intend to move the car beyond the jurisdiction of this state.
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  You don't say California, you say this state. Got it?
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  Okay.
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  So I'm transferring the car?
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  You wish to remove the car from the jurisdiction of this state, not transfer.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  Remove car.
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  Okay. So removing the jurisdiction beyond this state?
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  No.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:36:02.000]  I wish to remove the car from the jurisdiction of this state.
[01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  I do not say California in place of this state.
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  Say this state.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  Got it.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  Okay. Please conduct a lean and title search against VIN number blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah to verify that there are no outstanding liens or loans against said property and reply with whatever.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  Okay.
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  And make sure that you ask for a certified response.
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  Now you have proved that the state of California has no financial interest in the property, neither does anyone else within the jurisdiction of the state of California have a vested financial interest in the property.
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  Okay.
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  Okay.
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:00.000]  And then after that, is there anything else I need to do?
[01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  Yeah. After that, you informed the tax board that you no longer have a motor vehicle within the jurisdiction of the state of California.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  But again, talk to Kevin.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  He can tell you a little bit more about what to do and what to write specifically.
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  So send me your contact info and let me know that you need it forwarded to Kevin Michaels and I will do that.
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  Okay.
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  Okay. We'll do it.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  Thank you.
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  You're welcome.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  All right. Now that being said, we have Julian in Texas. Julian, what can we do for you?
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  Hey, Eddie. Can you hear me?
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  Yes, sir?
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:38.000]  Yeah. So I've had a couple of calls with Randy.
[01:37:38.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  Pilton, I travel a lot. Kind of ill-prepared this evening, but I got a couple questions for you.
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  Okay.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:51.000]  April 11th, I got stopped by a state trooper throwing jail.
[01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  I've been on the traffic website reading most of that material.
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  So I have a question.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:06.000]  If there's a difference between a peace officer and a state trooper, and does the same material apply to the state trooper if I'm trying to...
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  A state trooper is a peace officer under 2.12 code of criminal procedure.
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:21.000]  Article 2.12 code of criminal procedure has a list of all who are considered peace officers in the state of Texas.
[01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  The difference there is whether or not a police officer and a peace officer are the same, and under the transportation code, they are not.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  Okay.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  Yeah.
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  So the officer stopped me. I didn't have a license plate in front of my truck, and he was taking the tent from the front of my windshield.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  And while he's talking to me, he's asking me for my ID, and I'm telling him...
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  I'm asking him, you know, well, did I commit a crime? Is there a system?
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  And then he's asking me for my ID. It's only about the third time.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  I had irritated, and he just dropped this machine down, and he came around, and he literally just jerked me out of my car, unseatbelted me, and jerked me out of my car.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  And I knew that was it. So I went to jail.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  Okay.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:16.000]  I watched your video. I probably waited for that, and I should have done what you said.
[01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  I thought this guy looked like a, you know, I don't know what I was thinking. The guy looked like he might just kind of talk to you, and sure enough, man, he's just poor tempered. I don't know what happened.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  Okay. Well, follow complaint with his supervisor for his unprofessional conduct.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  The DPS officer is getting really big trouble for unprofessional conduct, because they have an image they're supposed to convey to the public,
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:49.000]  and losing their temper kind of destroys that image.
[01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  So I'm probably complaining with his supervisor, and I guess T-Close.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  T-Close doesn't have anything to do with him once he's certified. All they do is renew his certification.
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  He asks, his supervisor is the only one that can impact him with T-Close or his department.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  Okay. Super. All right.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  So I guess I need to find out more information on some of your material.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  I've heard you talking to some of the people here on the show tonight, and I keep mentioning it every Monday, so I'm glad they will catch you this evening.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  Yeah. Well, if you say you've been on my legal blog or what website are you talking about?
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  It's been the traffic website, I guess.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  I don't know.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:46.000]  Okay. Are you talking about Randy's traffic website? Are you talking about my legal blog?
[01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:48.000]  I haven't seen your legal blog.
[01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  Okay. My legal blog is a place you need to start reading for sure if you're going to be doing this stuff.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  That's Tal of Law, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W, dot wordpress.com.
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  All right. I got it.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  Okay.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  All right. So just another quick note.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  The guy takes me down. I request to see a judge, and sure enough, a judge shows up about an hour later.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  Did he put you in jail before he took you to the judge?
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  He took me to the holding, I guess, but they're at the hold.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:46.000]  Okay. Then he's still in violation of Texas law. He still violated your rights.
[01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:52.000]  Peace officers do not have arrest or incarceration powers in Texas.
[01:41:52.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  They have had, with the exception of natural disasters or riots or something like that, that prevent them from taking you directly to a magistrate in a reasonable time.
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:18.000]  Otherwise, they are mandated by law to deliver you directly to a magistrate, not to a holding cell, not to a jail cell, not to anyone else, to wait for a magistrate.
[01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  He's still in violation of Texas law. Put that in your complaint to his supervisor as well.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  All right. Yeah.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  So the other thing I was going to say was the judge, you know, he says, you know, how do you plead?
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  You were operating a vehicle without license plate on the front, all this stuff, and I'm like, well, you know, I'm not sure.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  I'm not going to act like, you know, I don't understand what's going on. And he says, well, obviously you were operating the vehicle because if you want to bond out, it's like being misdemeanor.
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:57.000]  Class D, I think. He's going to tell me it's going to be over $1,000 for a bond.
[01:42:57.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  And I'm like, I can't believe this. I got a driver's license here, which is the other thing they were asking me for.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:10.000]  Why didn't he just, you know, ask me for, you know, did I have my driver's license on me then, but then they told me.
[01:43:10.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  Either way, I ended up having a bail, I think.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:20.000]  So I could get on my travels, but I was trying to get from and down.
[01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  Who was present when this judge met with you?
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  Nobody was present except for the bailiffs or not even the bailiffs, but the jail workers over there with it.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  So the prosecuting attorney wasn't there?
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  It was not an attorney there.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:41.000]  Okay, then we've got this judge by the short and curly. Hang on just a minute and we'll be right back.
[01:43:41.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  All right, folks, we're about to come into the last segment of the show, so y'all hang on and we'll get this wrapped up.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:17.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as a schedule one drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:23.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:44:23.000 --> 01:44:27.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:48.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  Call 888-910-4367. 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempUSA.org.
[01:45:18.000 --> 01:45:24.000]  Know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:24.000 --> 01:45:29.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[01:45:29.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:46:15.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  All right folks, we are back. We are now in the last segment of the show.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  We're going to see if we can't get this collar board emptied out and wrapped up.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:39.000]  All right, back to Julian in Texas. All right, Julian, let's explain real quick what this judge has done.
[01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  This judge has conducted an illegal ex parte communication with a defendant in a criminal case.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  Plain and simple. The judge also showed that they were neither fair nor impartial during this so-called proceeding.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  When the judge said, obviously you did such and such, the judge is attempting to address the evidence of the case.
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  That too is illegal under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:12.000]  The judge is not allowed to address the evidence in a case.
[01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  Okay, but that's what he's doing.
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  He is not there to conduct a probable cause hearing because that requires the presence of the prosecutor.
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:27.000]  Neither party in a criminal case is allowed to talk to the judge about the facts of the case without the other party being present.
[01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  All right, judicial conduct complained the judge.
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  Five criminal charges against the judge for official oppression, abuse of official capacity, official misconduct.
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  Let's see what else.
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  Oh, yes, tampering with the witness.
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  Kind of takes forehand here.
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  So, is the date or the date was the April 11th? Is there a deadline or something to do any of this?
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:03.000]  ASAP is always the answer.
[01:48:03.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  Yeah, because I feel like I've been just kind of dragging this out. I haven't been able to get in touch with you guys, but I want to do something about it.
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  Yeah, well, then ASAP it is.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  Yeah, my next question is how a spending dude to hold over, I know they got cameras there.
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  Is there a way I can request video in the audio?
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:27.000]  Yes, file both a public information request and a motion for discovery for those jail records.
[01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  Not only do you want the video in the audio from the police cruiser and the body mics and cameras and everything that the DPS trooper had,
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  you want them for everything that happened in the jail, including the encounter with the judge.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  You want to show on video if at all possible. See, there I am locked in a cell.
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  There's the judge, no prosecuting attorney, no defense counsel.
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  I was never given a 15.17 hearing, asked if I even spoke English, asked if I understood my rights, had my rights read to me,
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  or offered assistance of counsel at any time.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  In other words, this judge did everything possible to violate my rights in that jail cell.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  Alright, I might have to email you and get some more info from me.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  Well, give it a shot, just make sure you run down a list of things that you're needing so to remind me of what we're talking about,
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  because I get way too many of those to remember on a person-by-person basis without it.
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:30.000]  Yes, sir. I appreciate your time.
[01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:32.000]  Yes, sir, thanks for calling in.
[01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:33.000]  Thank you.
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  You're welcome.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  Alright, that being said, we now have the last one in line, which is surprising, is Truth Raider in Oregon.
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  Raider, what do you got?
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  I have a question for you, Andy. Well, I hope you keep it cool during this heat wave.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:50.000]  That's not a question.
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:50:03.000]  Anyway, I found a few statutes, and I have a video that I would like you to be able to do if you have the chance to be able to do so.
[01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:14.000]  It's been five minutes long, and it's entitled, Oregon law enforcement is acting in fraud because it's been deceived by a tricky lawyer.
[01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:19.000]  It's CGI voice, it's a man and a woman, electronic voice, and lays it all out.
[01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:37.000]  It shows the statutes when they're acting in fraud, shows this stateless slate of attorney, who is the one that is, changing the suspense, altering the words, modifying the statutes, in a sense, in the vehicle code,
[01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  and making it appear that it applies to everyone.
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:52.000]  So, he's using the vehicle code to apply to everyone, and it describes how you can file charges against that state legislator, and there's...
[01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  Against the legislator or the prosecutor?
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  No, we want to act the judicial branch and the legislative branch, the executive branch, the three branches.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  He's actually in between those.
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  Well, to the best of my knowledge, there's no way you're going to file charges against a legislator for a law.
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:19.000]  Okay.
[01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  There is absolutely no way, because the Constitution forbids them being called to task for anything they do in their legislative capacity.
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:35.000]  So, it's the authority to record.
[01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:38.000]  Well, that's a different question.
[01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  Besides not reelect them, if you can show that something they did personally harmed you, then you'd have to go for everybody that voted for the bill they put in there, which also isn't going to get you anywhere.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  You see the problem?
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  One legislator cannot hurt you by themselves.
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  Well, what they've done is that you've served the vehicle code, which is strict.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  The legislature didn't do that, because the vehicle code is written correctly.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  So, the legislature didn't do that.
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  The executive may have, the courts may have, but the legislature didn't, because the vehicle code is what they enacted, and it says what it says.
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:28.000]  Okay.
[01:52:28.000 --> 01:52:44.000]  So, we covered a particular chapter in the vehicle code that's under the vehicle code chapter 807.031, and it's all commercial language, commercial life, A, B, D, and C, and it's all preface with commercial license.
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  And that's in the code.
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  So, there's nothing in there saying for the general public.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:52.000]  So, I found discovery of that.
[01:52:52.000 --> 01:53:12.000]  Yesterday at 1.208, item number two, letter C and E, and I took that, and I wrote the notice of discovery, and I took it down to the courthouse here in my town for the previous cases, and one more possible tribunal coming up in August.
[01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:18.000]  But I haven't heard anything from them, so I think they're going to probably go ahead and dismiss their question or something like that.
[01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  I haven't heard from them.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  I just beat the previous case, as you know.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:34.000]  Well, just send me whatever you found on those statutes, and I'll get to it as quick as I can to see how it ties in with the other stuff I've got for up there.
[01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  Okay.
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:38.000]  Can you take a look at this time in the video?
[01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:40.000]  It's on YouTube.
[01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  Again, send me the information about it, and I'll see.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  Time is not exactly how I'd like to spend it here lately.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  Okay.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  I've got too many cases on my plate and too much other stuff.
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:56.000]  I'm also having to get done in the process.
[01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  Well, in a paper, it means you're going to be quite a busy bee.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:13.000]  Yeah, well, I'd give anything for a bout of multiplicity here, just so I could have enough me's to go around to get stuff done.
[01:54:13.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  Okay.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  Yeah, I understand that.
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:16.000]  All right.
[01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  I'll go ahead and jump, but this information I want to pass to you is something I'm doing currently in my case.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:21.000]  Okay.
[01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  I should keep cool, and goodnight.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  We'll talk to you all later.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  All right.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  All right.
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Let's see.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:30.000]  Now we have four minutes.
[01:54:30.000 --> 01:54:32.000]  Let's see if we can get Tim in Texas.
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  Tim, what do you got?
[01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  You mentioned earlier to a guy about the camera laws and being a felony to send the citation by mail.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:45.000]  No.
[01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  What I said was it's a felony to simulate legal process in Texas.
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  And by sending a letter containing a threat of punitive action that is not authorized by law, that's what they did.
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:00.000]  Okay.
[01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  My question, does that have the same to do with, I got a ticket sent to me by mail for a junk vehicle.
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:18.000]  It was a truck of mine that had an antique license plate on it, and it wasn't dismantled or wrecked or anything.
[01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:23.000]  It was parked in front of my shop, and they sent it to me that way.
[01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  Would that be under the same code?
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  No, because it's not, it depends.
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  The first thing is, is what evidence are they using to say it was a junk vehicle, which of course is something they want to bait you into arguing about?
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  Yeah.
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  The previous year had been cited for that among eight other vehicles in an ordinance, and they took it from being junk vehicle to being a health and safety hazard,
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  which defines ten times the amount maximum fine.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:00.000]  Yeah.
[01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:01.000]  More fraud.
[01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:08.000]  Anyway, I still hadn't even broken the ordinance laws, because when I read them, it said that not only did they have to be on license,
[01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  but they also had to either be dismantled, wrecked, or inoperable, and they were none of those.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  So what you're going to have to do is you're going to have to go after the city council.
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:25.000]  You're going to have to, whose name is on that letter, or that notice, or whatever it was they sent you.
[01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  The enforcement officer, but he stated in there, he says, per the city attorney, and the city attorney has a civil case against me with district court,
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  and now we have a writ of mandamus with the second court of Pills and Tarrant County, and they have sent back twice now questions to the city to answer,
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  and the city's attorneys have been the ones answering these.
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:59.000]  The last one was, where did they adopt the administrative adjudication process into the ordinance for the junk vehicles?
[01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:07.000]  And what they said was, well, we have it for substandard housing, which is a health and safety hazard,
[01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  and they're using that as the answer to that.
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  No, because that would alter the subject matter of the law.
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:18.000]  That would bring something under the canopy, well, of their ordinance, I should say, not the law.
[01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  That would bring something under the canopy of their ordinance that was not part of the original purpose for its enactment.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  Exactly.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  Are you responding in rebuttal to anything that they're filing?
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  Well, you're talking about the response that they filed to the second court of appeal?
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  Yes.
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:39.000]  Yes, Randy's been helping me on this.
[01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:40.000]  Okay.
[01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:48.000]  But when you mentioned, I'm listening to you tonight, and when you mentioned that about the simulating the legal process,
[01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  I thought to myself, I got to find out what he's talking about.
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:58:01.000]  Simulating legal process has to do with a summons or a subpoena or something that is ordering you to take a specific action
[01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  or suffer punitive damages as far as something of that nature.
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  A $500 fine that they're trying to get me for.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  It very well could be simulation of legal process if you can prove it was issued fraudulently.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  Okay.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  And is there a number that I can look that up?
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  Well, the penal code is where you're going to find simulation of legal process.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  Penal code, okay.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  Okay.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  All right.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  I appreciate you.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  All right, folks.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  I am out of time.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  One more caller popped up, but I am not going to be able to get to that call.
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:39.000]  I want to thank everyone that called in for everyone who's been listening.
[01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  Y'all have a great week.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:41.000]  Good night, and God bless.
[01:58:51.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:12.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:21.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:31.000]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:31.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.