ROL_2018-06-18_16k.timecode

[00:15.040 --> 00:23.440]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.440 --> 00:29.760]  Markets for the 11th of April, 2018, closed with gold at $1,353.22 an ounce, silver at
[00:29.760 --> 00:41.120]  $16.68 an ounce, Texas crude at $65.51 a barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80,
[00:41.120 --> 00:55.360]  bitcoin cash at $652.90, and finally litecoins at $114.34, a crypto coin.
[00:55.360 --> 01:01.020]  Today in history, the year 1968, President Lyndon Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act
[01:01.020 --> 01:06.000]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color,
[01:06.000 --> 01:08.360]  religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:08.360 --> 01:13.000]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.000 --> 01:18.100]  in public schools and employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:18.100 --> 01:23.760]  Today in history.
[01:23.760 --> 01:27.800]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:27.800 --> 01:32.080]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:32.080 --> 01:36.520]  is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:36.520 --> 01:41.280]  United States, and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:41.280 --> 01:43.160]  evidence as of yet.
[01:43.160 --> 01:46.640]  President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday, that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down
[01:46.640 --> 01:51.000]  any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready Russia, because they will be coming in nice
[01:51.000 --> 01:52.720]  and new and smart.
[01:52.720 --> 01:56.240]  Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who
[01:56.240 --> 01:58.400]  kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:58.400 --> 02:02.440]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[02:02.440 --> 02:06.600]  attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:06.600 --> 02:10.880]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the Organization
[02:10.880 --> 02:15.680]  for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to investigate the site of the chemical slaughter.
[02:15.680 --> 02:19.200]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil
[02:19.200 --> 02:23.840]  war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[02:23.840 --> 02:28.600]  rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[02:28.600 --> 02:32.360]  notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.360 --> 02:37.680]  No surprise, then, why Russian Foreign Minister spokeswoman Mary Azakova posted on Facebook
[02:37.680 --> 02:42.720]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government which has
[02:42.720 --> 02:46.920]  been fighting terrorists, or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[02:46.920 --> 02:51.320]  strike and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[03:16.920 --> 03:44.480]  Alright, good evening, folks.
[03:44.480 --> 03:47.280]  This is another episode of How to Be a Better Lover.
[03:47.280 --> 03:48.280]  Wait, what?
[03:48.280 --> 03:50.960]  You mean it's Monday, not Wednesday?
[03:50.960 --> 03:53.360]  Oh, sorry about that.
[03:53.360 --> 03:55.940]  Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[03:55.940 --> 03:56.940]  Thank you for listening in.
[03:56.940 --> 04:03.680]  Alright, tonight, before I turn on the phones and start taking any calls, I am going to
[04:03.680 --> 04:08.360]  talk a little bit about something that I got called about today.
[04:08.360 --> 04:14.460]  I have relatives that are licensed peace officers here in the state of Texas, one of which is
[04:14.460 --> 04:20.700]  my cousin who called me today to ask me a question about what law I was studying that
[04:20.700 --> 04:27.500]  showed that deputy sheriffs and police officers can't stop someone under the transportation
[04:27.500 --> 04:28.880]  code.
[04:28.880 --> 04:34.000]  So I tried to do a quick recap summary of all the things that we've discussed over the
[04:34.000 --> 04:41.780]  years about why this is and what it's all about and how you verify that because he was
[04:41.780 --> 04:47.620]  having an issue with the other deputy not believing the information, which of course
[04:47.620 --> 04:52.560]  is standard interpretation of the law because they don't actually read it, they don't actually
[04:52.560 --> 04:55.600]  understand it, and they're not actually trained on it.
[04:55.600 --> 04:59.000]  And if it's not in their training, it doesn't exist.
[04:59.000 --> 05:02.920]  At least that's my experience with most of them when it comes to this.
[05:02.920 --> 05:07.600]  If they weren't taught it at the academy, then it's not relevant and doesn't apply even
[05:07.600 --> 05:13.520]  if it is the law on the subject that they are having an issue with.
[05:13.520 --> 05:21.120]  So what I'm going to do tonight is I am going to go through the various parts of the law
[05:21.120 --> 05:27.240]  that you would have to look at in order to understand the concepts of what transportation
[05:27.240 --> 05:34.440]  is, what it isn't, why local cops, county, and municipal are not automatically authorized
[05:34.440 --> 05:42.920]  to enforce any part of it or to perform any arrest or any stops in relation to that code,
[05:42.920 --> 05:52.120]  and why when they do so, they run the risk of being sued for acting without lawful authority.
[05:52.120 --> 05:57.880]  Because if the law does not give them the authority they are exercising, then they are
[05:57.880 --> 06:02.040]  acting beyond their legal authority.
[06:02.040 --> 06:07.360]  And when a local officer who is not certified by the Department of Public Safety and whose
[06:07.360 --> 06:12.120]  county or municipality does not have a reciprocity agreement, more or less is what it boils down
[06:12.120 --> 06:17.160]  to, with the Department of Public Safety as to how to properly enforce the transportation
[06:17.160 --> 06:26.960]  code, then they are acting unlawfully and illegally in their capacity by impersonating
[06:26.960 --> 06:34.400]  a duly authorized peace officer, or in this case police officer as defined by the statutes,
[06:34.400 --> 06:39.680]  that is authorized to enforce an arrest under the transportation code.
[06:39.680 --> 06:45.960]  So we're going to start with the beginning steps on where this information becomes reality
[06:45.960 --> 06:52.960]  and why if anyone with any brains would actually sit down and put this together, which basically
[06:52.960 --> 07:00.080]  eliminates every attorney and judge in the state, not to mention the cops, 99.9% of whom
[07:00.080 --> 07:06.040]  barely graduated school for the most part, or how they didn't is beyond me considering
[07:06.040 --> 07:10.600]  that when you try to talk reasonably to them in real life, their brain shuts off.
[07:10.600 --> 07:14.560]  I don't know if they started plugging that switch in at the academy or not, but it seems
[07:14.560 --> 07:16.320]  to be the case.
[07:16.320 --> 07:21.960]  Anyway, this is the details of how it all works and how you verify it.
[07:21.960 --> 07:26.640]  We begin with the fact that the Texas transportation code is called the transportation code.
[07:26.640 --> 07:30.860]  The legal definition of transportation being the movement of persons or property from one
[07:30.860 --> 07:33.620]  place to another by a carrier.
[07:33.620 --> 07:38.360]  Carrier being defined legally as someone who is engaged in the business or occupation of
[07:38.360 --> 07:45.120]  transporting persons or property for compensation or hire, okay?
[07:45.120 --> 07:52.920]  Operators hire operators and drivers or they contract with operators and drivers.
[07:52.920 --> 07:59.640]  Operators most of the time is a business profession such as a taxi cab company for instance.
[07:59.640 --> 08:06.080]  You have to have an operator's license in most cities to operate a cab business.
[08:06.080 --> 08:11.680]  Now if you're part of a larger incorporated business that runs tens to hundreds of cabs
[08:11.680 --> 08:20.280]  like in New York City, the yellow cab company does, then your operation is normally distinctive
[08:20.280 --> 08:24.840]  and separate from your drivers, okay?
[08:24.840 --> 08:30.560]  So an operator under the definition of the laws that pertains in that context is not
[08:30.560 --> 08:32.440]  the same as a driver.
[08:32.440 --> 08:35.400]  It is not someone in control of a motor vehicle.
[08:35.400 --> 08:42.400]  It is someone who is in control of the business that owns and operates that motor vehicle,
[08:42.400 --> 08:43.780]  okay?
[08:43.780 --> 08:46.460]  Same thing applies to driver.
[08:46.460 --> 08:53.640]  Driver is someone who is being paid by that carrier or that operator to work for them
[08:53.640 --> 08:55.180]  as a driver.
[08:55.180 --> 09:00.920]  They're getting paid to do the job of driving, whether it be to deliver persons, goods or
[09:00.920 --> 09:05.160]  property from one point to another, okay?
[09:05.160 --> 09:10.620]  That is the legal definition of transportation and how it trickles down through all the other
[09:10.620 --> 09:14.680]  definitions that are applicable to the various codes.
[09:14.680 --> 09:18.460]  Here in Texas it is the transportation code.
[09:18.460 --> 09:23.220]  Transportation is the singular subject matter that the Texas legislature stated in the title
[09:23.220 --> 09:28.280]  of the bill that created the transportation code as being the sole limiting subject to
[09:28.280 --> 09:35.960]  which every statute in that code must apply and is strictly limited to in its application.
[09:35.960 --> 09:41.640]  It can't go beyond anything that is not specifically transportation related.
[09:41.640 --> 09:46.880]  To do so is a violation of the state constitution, okay?
[09:46.880 --> 09:49.800]  Now we get into the body of the code itself.
[09:49.800 --> 09:53.760]  Besides the fact that the code was unconstitutionally enacted, which I will not be getting into
[09:53.760 --> 09:59.440]  in this show, if the code were presumed to be constitutional in its enactment, then this
[09:59.440 --> 10:04.320]  is still proof positive that it does not apply to the general public.
[10:04.320 --> 10:10.860]  In every single chapter of the Texas transportation code that deals with public safety and enforcement,
[10:10.860 --> 10:16.260]  there is a definition for the term department, okay?
[10:16.260 --> 10:23.280]  Every single one of those chapters defines department as the Texas Department of Public
[10:23.280 --> 10:24.280]  Safety.
[10:24.280 --> 10:28.240]  Now it says it in various forms, the Department of Public Safety of the state of Texas, the
[10:28.240 --> 10:31.880]  Texas Department of Public Safety, and blah, blah, blah, but it all boils down to it's
[10:31.880 --> 10:37.640]  the same agency in every single definition of department, okay?
[10:37.640 --> 10:38.640]  Same agency.
[10:38.640 --> 10:40.640]  No is, no ands, no buts.
[10:40.640 --> 10:43.800]  It never includes locals in those definitions.
[10:43.800 --> 10:49.320]  Not once does it ever say the Department of Public Safety of the state of Texas, local
[10:49.320 --> 10:51.960]  law enforcement of municipalities and counties.
[10:51.960 --> 10:53.000]  Does not say that.
[10:53.000 --> 10:55.520]  Anywhere.
[10:55.520 --> 11:00.440]  It simply says the Texas Department of Public Safety, okay?
[11:00.440 --> 11:07.480]  So by default, the Texas Department of Public Safety is the only agency in the entire transportation
[11:07.480 --> 11:13.200]  code under those specific kinds of chapters, enforcement and public safety, that is authorized
[11:13.200 --> 11:18.680]  as a matter of law to enforce the transportation code under those chapters.
[11:18.680 --> 11:26.040]  Something else has to do with building maintenance, marking, planning and so on of roads, signs
[11:26.040 --> 11:31.280]  and things of that nature which is all Department of Transportation, okay?
[11:31.280 --> 11:36.760]  So in there, you have two different definitions for department depending upon what the context
[11:36.760 --> 11:39.480]  and purpose of a chapter is.
[11:39.480 --> 11:45.000]  It's either Department of Public Safety or it's Department of Transportation, okay?
[11:45.000 --> 11:50.480]  Now there is a newly formed Department of Motor Vehicles which fall under the county
[11:50.480 --> 11:54.920]  tax assessor collector side of these things, okay?
[11:54.920 --> 11:59.640]  Under Department of Motor Vehicles, the only chapter that pertains to them is registration,
[11:59.640 --> 12:04.780]  the actual way to perform registration, okay?
[12:04.780 --> 12:13.880]  But enforcement doesn't have a specific identifying thing other than the Department of Transportation.
[12:13.880 --> 12:17.040]  It doesn't identify the Department of Public Safety for the purpose of enforcement if I'm
[12:17.040 --> 12:18.040]  remembering correctly.
[12:18.040 --> 12:24.280]  Even if it does, it never identifies local law enforcement, never.
[12:24.280 --> 12:29.560]  Now you take the fact that every single chapter dealing with enforcement and public safety
[12:29.560 --> 12:33.800]  falls under the sole authority of the Department of Public Safety.
[12:33.800 --> 12:38.040]  Then you go to the Texas Administrative Code and you find out that under Title 37, the
[12:38.040 --> 12:42.680]  Department of Public Safety is a state administrative agency.
[12:42.680 --> 12:49.800]  Administrative agency, not a law enforcement agency, an administrative agency.
[12:49.800 --> 12:56.040]  Only administrative agencies appear in the administrative code, okay?
[12:56.040 --> 13:01.980]  No non-administrative agencies are in the administrative code with parameters set up
[13:01.980 --> 13:05.220]  for how they do their jobs.
[13:05.220 --> 13:11.520]  Now under Title 37, you have the mission statement of the Department of Public Safety, okay?
[13:11.520 --> 13:14.840]  Rule 1.12 to be exact.
[13:14.840 --> 13:20.360]  And rule 1.12 in pertinent parts says that the mission of the Department of Public Safety
[13:20.360 --> 13:28.200]  is to supervise traffic on rural highways and to supervise and regulate commercial and
[13:28.200 --> 13:29.960]  for hire traffic.
[13:29.960 --> 13:31.760]  You get that?
[13:31.760 --> 13:36.480]  Regulate commercial and for hire traffic.
[13:36.480 --> 13:40.080]  Now a little further down, it says that the Department of Public Safety is authorized
[13:40.080 --> 13:46.460]  to initiate the following programs for the purpose of fulfilling their duties under their
[13:46.460 --> 13:49.000]  mission statement, okay?
[13:49.000 --> 13:54.500]  So regulation involves specific programs which the Department of Public Safety is authorized
[13:54.500 --> 14:00.120]  to create, maintain, and watch over in every form and fashion, okay?
[14:00.120 --> 14:08.120]  That is motor vehicle insurance, okay, which is financial responsibility under the statutes.
[14:08.120 --> 14:14.560]  It is driver's licensing, which is also under the transportation code statutes.
[14:14.560 --> 14:17.880]  Let's see.
[14:17.880 --> 14:20.680]  And public safety inspection, okay?
[14:20.680 --> 14:25.680]  So those are the three specific programs the administrative code authorizes the Texas Department
[14:25.680 --> 14:32.760]  of Public Safety to create and oversee relating to the enforcement of the transportation code.
[14:32.760 --> 14:38.320]  Public safety inspections, driver's licensing, financial responsibility.
[14:38.320 --> 14:44.660]  Now remember, these programs are related to that term regulate under their mission statement.
[14:44.660 --> 14:50.160]  And the only thing the Department of Public Safety is authorized to regulate is commercial
[14:50.160 --> 14:53.640]  and for hire traffic, okay?
[14:53.640 --> 14:55.960]  No ifs, no ands, no buts.
[14:55.960 --> 14:57.100]  That's all it says.
[14:57.100 --> 14:59.320]  That's all there is.
[14:59.320 --> 15:07.860]  The transportation code cannot go beyond what the power of the agency is, okay?
[15:07.860 --> 15:14.720]  So if that agency is given authority within the transportation code, the presumption of
[15:14.720 --> 15:26.120]  law must be that the transportation code has to be fulfilled and enforced and operates
[15:26.120 --> 15:31.220]  within the parameters of authority given to that administrative agency.
[15:31.220 --> 15:33.960]  It can't go beyond that.
[15:33.960 --> 15:38.480]  So if they're limited to commercial and for hire traffic, then the transportation code
[15:38.480 --> 15:42.720]  itself to be within their purview, which we absolutely know it is because they're the
[15:42.720 --> 15:49.240]  only agency given authority over that code in every one of those chapters for enforcement
[15:49.240 --> 15:55.400]  and public safety, it has to be commercial, commercial and for hire traffic.
[15:55.400 --> 15:57.320]  That's all there is, okay?
[15:57.320 --> 15:59.440]  There's nothing else.
[15:59.440 --> 16:01.840]  You won't find a law that says there's anything else.
[16:01.840 --> 16:06.320]  You'll find lots of law that is worded to make it appear that it can cover something
[16:06.320 --> 16:13.120]  else but nowhere will you find it definitively stated that it does so and if it did do that,
[16:13.120 --> 16:17.280]  it would immediately run afoul of the delegated authority given to the Department of Public
[16:17.280 --> 16:19.400]  Safety under the Texas Administrative Code.
[16:19.400 --> 16:22.400]  Hence, we have a conflict if that were the case.
[16:22.400 --> 16:27.640]  Hence, that is an unreasonable reading of the statute on its face because it has an
[16:27.640 --> 16:31.280]  unreasonable and undesirable outcome.
[16:31.280 --> 16:37.220]  It allows a regulatory code to expand the administrative power of an agency that is
[16:37.220 --> 16:41.600]  strictly limited by the rules of the agency.
[16:41.600 --> 16:46.720]  To see what the problem here, basically that would be the court saying that the transportation
[16:46.720 --> 16:52.480]  code has authorized an administrative agency to act outside of its lawful authority granted
[16:52.480 --> 16:54.320]  by the legislature, which can't happen.
[16:54.320 --> 17:03.920]  All right folks, hang on, we'll be right back to continue this on.
[17:03.920 --> 17:10.440]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway, sponsored by Central Texas
[17:10.440 --> 17:11.440]  Gunworks.
[17:11.440 --> 17:15.360]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:15.360 --> 17:18.840]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:18.840 --> 17:25.600]  From Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[17:25.600 --> 17:28.400]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:28.400 --> 17:34.480]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's eBook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:34.480 --> 17:38.360]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:38.360 --> 17:42.840]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:42.840 --> 17:47.400]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can
[17:47.400 --> 17:51.940]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[17:51.940 --> 17:55.160]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:55.160 --> 18:00.600]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.600 --> 18:05.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.920 --> 18:09.400]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meris Proven Method.
[18:09.400 --> 18:13.720]  Michael Meris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.720 --> 18:14.720]  can win too.
[18:14.720 --> 18:19.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using
[18:19.120 --> 18:24.880]  federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons,
[18:24.880 --> 18:28.720]  how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit
[18:28.720 --> 18:34.160]  report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.160 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Meris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.400]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.400 --> 18:46.960]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Meris banner
[18:46.960 --> 18:49.640]  or email MichaelMeris at Yahoo.com.
[18:49.640 --> 18:59.480]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.480 --> 19:00.480]  now.
[19:00.480 --> 19:09.480]  If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:30.480 --> 19:56.480]  Thank you very much.
[20:00.480 --> 20:29.480]  It's 2 a.m. here at dawn, and it's 2 a.m., the sun is still warm.
[20:29.480 --> 20:59.000]  All right, folks, that's all the time we have for this week.
[20:59.000 --> 21:01.160]  All right, folks, I apologize for the delay there.
[21:01.160 --> 21:03.960]  I was trying to get an event up on Facebook.
[21:03.960 --> 21:06.960]  I'm having a little problem with getting it to go through.
[21:06.960 --> 21:11.120]  I don't know why, but it finally did, and I'm sorry for the delay on getting back on
[21:11.120 --> 21:12.120]  here.
[21:12.120 --> 21:14.360]  All right, now, to continue on where we are.
[21:14.360 --> 21:18.600]  The Department of Public Safety being the only agency directly authorized by law to
[21:18.600 --> 21:22.640]  enforce a transportation code is the very first limiting factor on the local's ability
[21:22.640 --> 21:24.160]  to do so.
[21:24.160 --> 21:31.640]  Now, when you look through there, you will come across rule 4.13, subsection C. Under
[21:31.640 --> 21:38.280]  there you will find in relation to the definition section under chapter 541 of the transportation
[21:38.280 --> 21:44.880]  code where it specifically identifies a defined phrase, police officer.
[21:44.880 --> 21:52.020]  In the definition under 541 of police officer, you will read that it is someone who is authorized
[21:52.020 --> 21:57.280]  to arrest and enforce under the transportation code provisions.
[21:57.280 --> 22:06.000]  Now, right there is proof positive that whoever does this must have a specific authority to
[22:06.000 --> 22:08.400]  enforce that code.
[22:08.400 --> 22:15.720]  And as we've already heard, the statutes specifically grant that authority only to the Texas Department
[22:15.720 --> 22:22.800]  of Public Safety and its officers and employees, not to the local and municipal cops, not the
[22:22.800 --> 22:26.880]  sheriff's deputies, not to anybody else.
[22:26.880 --> 22:27.880]  Okay?
[22:27.880 --> 22:36.040]  So, given that aspect, when you go and you read 4.13, subsection C, and it tells us very
[22:36.040 --> 22:42.000]  clearly what the geographic location of any municipality or county must be.
[22:42.000 --> 22:47.600]  It tells us what the specific population of any municipality or county must be.
[22:47.600 --> 22:52.900]  It tells us exactly how the training and certification requirements for an agent of the Department
[22:52.900 --> 22:59.680]  of Public Safety is obtained in order to be an enforcement officer, i.e. police officer
[22:59.680 --> 23:03.600]  under the definition under 541 of the transportation code.
[23:03.600 --> 23:04.920]  Okay?
[23:04.920 --> 23:13.480]  So if the only persons that are actually authorized by law to enforce a transportation code are
[23:13.480 --> 23:19.860]  the authorized police officers, which the Department of Public Safety is the sole ones
[23:19.860 --> 23:25.600]  from the very beginning, and rule 4.13 under Title 37 of the Texas Administrative Code
[23:25.600 --> 23:30.880]  tells us that the only way that any other agency can do it is to become certified by
[23:30.880 --> 23:36.800]  the Department of Public Safety, and then their certification is limited strictly to
[23:36.800 --> 23:42.200]  enforcement of chapter 644 of the transportation code.
[23:42.200 --> 23:44.680]  You get that?
[23:44.680 --> 23:47.880]  Chapter 644.
[23:47.880 --> 23:55.040]  Now when you read that, chapter 644 is commercial motor vehicle inspection.
[23:55.040 --> 23:57.300]  Okay?
[23:57.300 --> 24:06.500]  That is the only chapter under the Texas Transportation Code that the Texas Administrative Code authorizes
[24:06.500 --> 24:11.960]  local law enforcement that it becomes properly certified and trained by the Department of
[24:11.960 --> 24:14.560]  Public Safety to enforce.
[24:14.560 --> 24:19.740]  It's the only one, okay?
[24:19.740 --> 24:27.280]  So even if the local cop does get authorized, he is not authorized to enforce the entire
[24:27.280 --> 24:29.180]  transportation code.
[24:29.180 --> 24:35.600]  He can enforce only one specific chapter with one specific purpose, and that is inspection
[24:35.600 --> 24:42.160]  of commercial motor vehicles, chapter 644, okay?
[24:42.160 --> 24:48.860]  Now as I explained to my cousin again tonight when he was asking the question, is that when
[24:48.860 --> 24:54.120]  you go through this and you put all these pieces together and you see the puzzle picture
[24:54.120 --> 25:02.040]  as a whole once you've got it in place, you can see that the local officers and the Department
[25:02.040 --> 25:08.260]  of Public Safety officers are being set up as cannon fodder.
[25:08.260 --> 25:14.760]  In the eventuality that someone somewhere in the state of Texas figures this all out
[25:14.760 --> 25:22.480]  and puts all these pieces together and comes to this big picture of how this all inter-operates,
[25:22.480 --> 25:26.620]  they're going to be able to sue the pants off every cop who illegally enforces this
[25:26.620 --> 25:31.920]  code and there will be no immunity that can be attached to protect them.
[25:31.920 --> 25:32.920]  Why?
[25:32.920 --> 25:35.780]  One, they're acting with no lawful authority.
[25:35.780 --> 25:41.740]  An officer has no discretion to violate the law or to act in a manner which the law does
[25:41.740 --> 25:46.300]  not authorize him to act, okay?
[25:46.300 --> 25:52.000]  He is not allowed to impersonate an officer of another agency, which is exactly what the
[25:52.000 --> 25:55.980]  local cops are doing.
[25:55.980 --> 26:00.320]  When they enforce the transportation code without being properly certified and authorized
[26:00.320 --> 26:05.500]  by the Department of Public Safety and they do so in any manner outside of the given chapter
[26:05.500 --> 26:11.660]  of 644, then they are impersonating a duly authorized officer of the Department of Public
[26:11.660 --> 26:16.520]  Safety and that is a felony crime.
[26:16.520 --> 26:24.160]  And if anybody puts that all together, I won't name any names here, and comes to the conclusions
[26:24.160 --> 26:32.280]  that again, I won't name any names here, that are apparent from what is written, then the
[26:32.280 --> 26:39.020]  issue becomes who gets taken down first?
[26:39.020 --> 26:47.140]  Which cop, which town, which department, which city budget?
[26:47.140 --> 26:55.020]  Because this would be not only crimes against the public through fraud, extortion, unlawful
[26:55.020 --> 27:01.220]  acts by the officer, felony impersonation of an officer of a different agency, felony
[27:01.220 --> 27:08.420]  assault, felony murder when they've killed someone at one of these illegal traffic stops,
[27:08.420 --> 27:17.420]  felony kidnapping, okay, aggravated in every case because they're wearing a gun and they
[27:17.420 --> 27:23.500]  are more than willing to use it as we all well know.
[27:23.500 --> 27:29.580]  I mean it goes on and on, official oppression, abuse of official capacity, official misconduct,
[27:29.580 --> 27:35.780]  lying under oath, testifying falsely in court and committing aggravated perjury by doing
[27:35.780 --> 27:36.780]  so, etc.
[27:36.780 --> 27:39.540]  The list goes on and on and on.
[27:39.540 --> 27:45.460]  Every single traffic stop in the state of Texas is a laundry list of felonies and high
[27:45.460 --> 27:47.560]  misdemeanors.
[27:47.560 --> 27:56.220]  Every single one, either A, because the one doing the stop is not a duly authorized DPS
[27:56.220 --> 28:03.220]  officer or agent of the DPS, or two, it is being done against someone to whom the code
[28:03.220 --> 28:10.420]  actually does not apply, which is members of the general public not engaging in transportation.
[28:10.420 --> 28:23.300]  Because remember, DPS rule 1.12, their mission, regulation of commercial and for hire traffic.
[28:23.300 --> 28:31.900]  That absolutely excludes the general population that is not commercial and not for hire.
[28:31.900 --> 28:39.500]  It couldn't be any clearer than that, okay, unless you're a cop or an attorney or a judge
[28:39.500 --> 28:43.780]  and that's because clear is not in your vocabulary.
[28:43.780 --> 28:48.020]  How we want it is the only phrase you know.
[28:48.020 --> 28:50.260]  It's not what does the law say.
[28:50.260 --> 28:52.300]  It's not what the law is.
[28:52.300 --> 28:58.300]  It is what you want it to be.
[28:58.300 --> 29:03.300]  Now another thing I talked about on the last show and I did on Facebook last week was I
[29:03.300 --> 29:13.800]  posted an entire cornucopia of court cases, state and federal, that shoot down these idiotic
[29:13.800 --> 29:22.460]  patronate arguments on the all caps named Caponus Diminutio and the corporation argument
[29:22.460 --> 29:26.580]  and the fringe flag argument and the Queen of England argument.
[29:26.580 --> 29:34.780]  I mean all of them have been shot dead more than once and you still have idiots promoting
[29:34.780 --> 29:43.940]  them as fact, as solution and people are still listening and I can't figure that out.
[29:43.940 --> 29:48.340]  I mean how many times does someone have to set your ass on fire for you to realize that's
[29:48.340 --> 29:51.980]  not someone you want to have around gasoline and matches?
[29:51.980 --> 29:55.540]  How dumb do you have to be to let that act continue?
[29:55.540 --> 30:01.660]  Hang on just a second folks and we'll continue this little tarot on the other side.
[30:01.660 --> 30:03.340]  Are you lucky?
[30:03.340 --> 30:07.140]  Researchers say living a charmed life is more about the choices you make than fate.
[30:07.140 --> 30:11.580]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with four behaviors that increase your odds
[30:11.580 --> 30:15.500]  of finding a pot of gold at the end of your rainbow.
[30:15.500 --> 30:17.100]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.100 --> 30:21.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again and once your privacy
[30:21.500 --> 30:25.460]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.460 --> 30:30.620]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.620 --> 30:33.220]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.220 --> 30:37.520]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.520 --> 30:41.060]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[30:41.060 --> 30:44.580]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.580 --> 30:48.860]  According to psychologist Richard Wiseman, people blessed with good fortune practice
[30:48.860 --> 30:51.420]  four behaviors that set them apart.
[30:51.420 --> 30:55.860]  Lucky people don't wait around for a windfall, they make luck happen, they network and keep
[30:55.860 --> 30:58.900]  an eye out for opportunities, then they act on them.
[30:58.900 --> 31:02.500]  Lucky people develop their intuition and trust their gut feelings.
[31:02.500 --> 31:05.180]  Lucky people expect good things to happen to them.
[31:05.180 --> 31:09.660]  They persist in working toward their goals because they believe in positive outcomes.
[31:09.660 --> 31:13.060]  These expectations become self-fulfilling prophecies.
[31:13.060 --> 31:16.260]  And finally, lucky people turn lemons into lemonade.
[31:16.260 --> 31:21.340]  They don't dwell on setbacks, rather they find ways to take control and turn situations
[31:21.340 --> 31:22.820]  around in their favor.
[31:22.820 --> 31:24.620]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:24.620 --> 31:30.760]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.760 --> 31:36.140]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[31:36.140 --> 31:41.580]  The government says that fire brought it down, however, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[31:41.580 --> 31:43.180]  it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.180 --> 31:47.180]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow
[31:47.180 --> 31:48.620]  first responders are dying.
[31:48.620 --> 31:50.020]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.020 --> 31:51.020]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.020 --> 31:52.460]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:52.460 --> 31:53.460]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.460 --> 31:55.140]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.140 --> 31:57.740]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.740 --> 32:02.380]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.380 --> 32:05.140]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[32:05.140 --> 32:08.740]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[32:08.740 --> 32:12.980]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.980 --> 32:16.140]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.140 --> 32:20.180]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.180 --> 32:24.540]  The courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[32:24.540 --> 32:25.540]  through due process.
[32:25.540 --> 32:29.420]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.420 --> 32:33.200]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.200 --> 32:35.580]  is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.580 --> 32:39.580]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and
[32:39.580 --> 32:40.580]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.580 --> 32:44.100]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.100 --> 32:48.660]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.660 --> 32:50.940]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.940 --> 32:54.140]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[32:54.140 --> 33:02.820]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.820 --> 33:20.620]  Visit FreeSpeechRadio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:20.620 --> 33:41.300]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:41.300 --> 33:47.700]  This is Rule of Law Radio and just in case I didn't say it, it is June 18th, 2018.
[33:47.700 --> 33:49.220]  We are live tonight.
[33:49.220 --> 33:55.700]  It's not imaginary and the things we're going through are not imaginary either.
[33:55.700 --> 34:03.180]  If you, like I was saying that I posted an entire cornucopia of case law on these idiotic
[34:03.180 --> 34:07.540]  patronate arguments and all I got out of it was argument after argument after argument
[34:07.540 --> 34:09.260]  about the courts lying, blah, blah, blah.
[34:09.260 --> 34:10.820]  Well, here's the thing.
[34:10.820 --> 34:13.980]  The courts don't actually lie.
[34:13.980 --> 34:18.060]  They abrogate and they obfuscate.
[34:18.060 --> 34:24.180]  That means diminish or cover up, but they don't actually lie.
[34:24.180 --> 34:27.180]  The way they do this is very simple.
[34:27.180 --> 34:37.900]  They keep returning to the statutory terminology as if it is applicable without first establishing
[34:37.900 --> 34:44.300]  that the code itself and the statutes under it as well as the definitions and terminology
[34:44.300 --> 34:50.380]  are applicable to the specific facts and circumstances involved in the case.
[34:50.380 --> 34:57.660]  An allegation that these facts are true is not synonymous with them being true and yet
[34:57.660 --> 35:06.120]  the courts propagate the illusion by using the same terminology despite the lack of evidence
[35:06.120 --> 35:12.620]  of jurisdictional application.
[35:12.620 --> 35:19.420]  They do this because you go into court making these patronate arguments or by failing to
[35:19.420 --> 35:25.340]  make the correct arguments even if you're not using a patronate argument.
[35:25.340 --> 35:30.340]  By that I mean arguing the right to travel where you still use all the same terms to
[35:30.340 --> 35:32.340]  describe your car and your right.
[35:32.340 --> 35:38.020]  Even if you don't use the same terms, all you're talking about is your right to travel.
[35:38.020 --> 35:50.940]  Well, my first question is this, show me where someone alleged and charged you with violating
[35:50.940 --> 35:54.720]  your right to travel.
[35:54.720 --> 35:58.660]  Did you commit an offense relating to your right to travel?
[35:58.660 --> 36:00.620]  No, you did not.
[36:00.620 --> 36:03.720]  That is not what they are alleging.
[36:03.720 --> 36:09.860]  They are alleging that you were acting in a legal capacity that had a duty under the
[36:09.860 --> 36:18.320]  commercial side of driving and operating upon the highways for business and that you failed
[36:18.320 --> 36:21.860]  to comply with your duty under that persona.
[36:21.860 --> 36:26.980]  Okay, see, they are not the same thing at all.
[36:26.980 --> 36:29.580]  Never have been, never will be.
[36:29.580 --> 36:33.060]  It is one of those illusions of law.
[36:33.060 --> 36:41.100]  It is one of those things that goes to the concept of legal person, not corporation,
[36:41.100 --> 36:43.680]  but simply legal person.
[36:43.680 --> 36:50.540]  In this case, legal person is a legal capacity, which I've also told you about before.
[36:50.540 --> 36:52.740]  That capacity has a name.
[36:52.740 --> 37:03.660]  It is either carrier, driver, operator, or something of those significant definitions
[37:03.660 --> 37:08.100]  that create the appearance of a duty under a regulatory code.
[37:08.100 --> 37:14.620]  Now, they can also be as simple as person or individual, all right?
[37:14.620 --> 37:18.820]  And they may even define it where it appears to encompass you.
[37:18.820 --> 37:23.700]  Natural person, that's how they define a living man under the law, natural person.
[37:23.700 --> 37:26.300]  But here's the problem.
[37:26.300 --> 37:32.380]  In every single case where you find the use of natural person within the transportation
[37:32.380 --> 37:39.940]  code, you are going to find, in addition to natural person, a list of legal entities.
[37:39.940 --> 37:46.120]  Not just legal capacities, but legal entities, corporations, associations, blah, blah, blah.
[37:46.120 --> 37:47.380]  Those are not capacities.
[37:47.380 --> 37:49.580]  Those are entities.
[37:49.580 --> 37:56.800]  A capacity is something that can be occupied only by a single living individual, whereas
[37:56.800 --> 38:03.320]  an entity can encompass several individuals, objects, and things of that nature within
[38:03.320 --> 38:06.940]  the sole category of whatever it's being called.
[38:06.940 --> 38:10.820]  It's a legal entity, all right?
[38:10.820 --> 38:16.100]  So when you look at that with those two distinctions, legal capacity versus legal entity, and that
[38:16.100 --> 38:23.620]  legal capacity means one of somebody acting on behalf of one of these legal entities.
[38:23.620 --> 38:28.460]  Now, why do we say it's someone when they said natural person, and then they use the
[38:28.460 --> 38:35.620]  term individual, or they use natural person without individual, but all the rest of the
[38:35.620 --> 38:40.020]  things that are in the list are legal entities?
[38:40.020 --> 38:46.860]  Why do I say that these things must operate in a way where they can be related?
[38:46.860 --> 38:51.060]  Well, because the rules of statutory construction require it.
[38:51.060 --> 38:55.460]  When they say means or includes, the difference between the two is this.
[38:55.460 --> 38:58.060]  Means is an exclusive list.
[38:58.060 --> 39:01.620]  Whatever's listed is all there is and nothing else.
[39:01.620 --> 39:07.000]  Includes is an expansive list, which means all the things that are here and any other
[39:07.000 --> 39:14.180]  thing that can be similarly identified as belonging to the same class that everything
[39:14.180 --> 39:18.340]  in this list must be a member of.
[39:18.340 --> 39:23.700]  See, when they give a definition that includes something that appears conflicting with everything
[39:23.700 --> 39:30.120]  else in the list, there has to be a reason and there has to be a reasonable explanation
[39:30.120 --> 39:32.620]  and outcome to why that is.
[39:32.620 --> 39:39.260]  It is not reasonable to say that a living person is bound by the exact same rules as
[39:39.260 --> 39:47.200]  a legal entity because the person, the physical living person was not created by law and is
[39:47.200 --> 39:55.340]  not subject to everything in law because that legal or that living individual has inherent
[39:55.340 --> 40:03.560]  fundamental protected rights that the legal thing does not have and never will have because
[40:03.560 --> 40:11.240]  it is a creation of man under man's law, whereas we are not okay.
[40:11.240 --> 40:19.760]  So our rights are not limited by man's law, where man's law is, runs directly a foul of
[40:19.760 --> 40:25.680]  a free enjoyment and exercise of those rights.
[40:25.680 --> 40:34.160]  Now I'm trying to collect my thoughts here, so I explained this correctly from the top
[40:34.160 --> 40:36.200]  down.
[40:36.200 --> 40:41.400]  So when you have an individual listed with corporation association, limited liability
[40:41.400 --> 40:45.080]  company and all these other legal entities, how do we reconcile one with the other?
[40:45.080 --> 40:51.240]  Well, I've got an article on that specific subject up on my website or my legal blog
[40:51.240 --> 40:59.200]  rather towel of law.wordpress.com t a o o f l a w.wordpress.com.
[40:59.200 --> 41:04.540]  When you go there and you read that, it goes into a great detail in explaining the use
[41:04.540 --> 41:11.080]  of includes and including, and it will explain the breakdown of all of these things about
[41:11.080 --> 41:16.160]  what happens when you take something that appears to be in conflict with a list of other
[41:16.160 --> 41:19.760]  things that are listed, and I don't want to have to get into that in great detail here
[41:19.760 --> 41:26.520]  because it's a complicated issue to repeat from memory because it takes some processing
[41:26.520 --> 41:29.200]  to make sure that you state it correctly and not confuse somebody.
[41:29.200 --> 41:33.220]  I took that time and made that effort in that article, so go find it.
[41:33.220 --> 41:39.480]  It's very important to read that so that you understand why that is used and how it works.
[41:39.480 --> 41:43.800]  Use and including does not mean what you think it means, and it's not used the way you think
[41:43.800 --> 41:48.440]  it is used, and it most certainly is not used the way the prosecutors, defense attorneys
[41:48.440 --> 41:53.660]  and courts are attempting to use it, and there's tons of law that says it's not the proper
[41:53.660 --> 41:56.400]  way to use it.
[41:56.400 --> 42:00.020]  So no matter what the state of Texas wants to do, the Supreme Court has already said
[42:00.020 --> 42:05.500]  that is not how you use that term, and you're not going to use it that way, and that case
[42:05.500 --> 42:10.000]  law is in that article, so you can read it and you can see what's going on with it.
[42:10.000 --> 42:15.520]  But needless to say, what it all boils down to is that the individual or natural person
[42:15.520 --> 42:22.940]  when listed with these legal entities, the only reasonable interpretation of that definition
[42:22.940 --> 42:32.060]  or phrase is that the individual must be acting in some capacity for the benefit or on the
[42:32.060 --> 42:36.560]  behalf of one of the listed legal entities.
[42:36.560 --> 42:41.640]  It's got to be some capacity relative to them that provides them with some authority or
[42:41.640 --> 42:47.520]  some benefit either acting for or on the behalf of that legal entity.
[42:47.520 --> 42:49.700]  You get it?
[42:49.700 --> 42:54.080]  It's just like when you read the sales tax statutes and you find that the only people
[42:54.080 --> 43:00.000]  that are required by law to collect the sales tax and to pay it over are people that work
[43:00.000 --> 43:03.360]  for a corporation.
[43:03.360 --> 43:07.600]  Everything in the statute specifically says that this person is someone who works for
[43:07.600 --> 43:11.800]  a corporation.
[43:11.800 --> 43:18.680]  It doesn't mention anyone else as being liable for collecting or paying over that sales tax,
[43:18.680 --> 43:26.100]  and yet they force everyone to do it despite the fact that the living individual cannot
[43:26.100 --> 43:32.200]  be compelled to waive their rights against indentured servitude to work as a tax collector
[43:32.200 --> 43:36.680]  for the state for nothing, which is exactly what the state is demanding every private
[43:36.680 --> 43:38.920]  business does.
[43:38.920 --> 43:43.120]  You will get a tax certificate, you will work as our tax collector, and you will take only
[43:43.120 --> 43:48.400]  what we offer you even if we offer you nothing at all to do that work for us, and it will
[43:48.400 --> 43:53.040]  be at your expense to get it all done in time and to pay it over to us.
[43:53.040 --> 43:55.080]  It's not going to be our problem.
[43:55.080 --> 43:56.080]  It's illegal, folks.
[43:56.080 --> 43:57.080]  It's unconstitutional.
[43:57.080 --> 43:59.080]  We'll be right back.
[43:59.080 --> 44:04.040]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.040 --> 44:10.680]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4CD course
[44:10.680 --> 44:14.640]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:14.640 --> 44:18.480]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.480 --> 44:22.800]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.800 --> 44:27.600]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.600 --> 44:34.400]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.400 --> 44:39.040]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:39.040 --> 44:43.160]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.160 --> 44:49.360]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.360 --> 44:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 44:59.440]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EASY.
[44:59.440 --> 45:09.280]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from NaturesPureOrganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our
[45:09.280 --> 45:14.480]  store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, to find Brave New Books
[45:14.480 --> 45:18.480]  and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.480 --> 45:23.120]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.120 --> 45:27.800]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Emu Oil,
[45:27.800 --> 45:31.520]  Lotion Candles, Olive Oil Soaps, and Colloidal Silver and Gold.
[45:31.520 --> 45:38.040]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at NaturesPureOrganics.com.
[45:38.040 --> 45:44.360]  That's 512-264-4043, NaturesPureOrganics.com.
[45:44.360 --> 45:49.960]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, NaturesPureOrganics.com.
[46:14.360 --> 46:26.960]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:26.960 --> 46:28.640]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:28.640 --> 46:34.640]  All right, to continue on with our little lesson here on how all this works.
[46:34.640 --> 46:41.480]  So when you have an individual listed with legal entities, that's the only thing it can
[46:41.480 --> 46:48.380]  be consumed or taken as in meaning and to have a proper outcome that isn't ridiculous
[46:48.380 --> 46:52.280]  or conflicts with other provisions of law, okay?
[46:52.280 --> 46:59.800]  So when it says natural person or individual alongside a list of legal entities, then we're
[46:59.800 --> 47:07.740]  talking about some individual required to act for the benefit or on the behalf of one
[47:07.740 --> 47:11.520]  of the types of entities listed, okay?
[47:11.520 --> 47:13.480]  That's just plain out common sense.
[47:13.480 --> 47:15.440]  Can't get around that any other way.
[47:15.440 --> 47:16.440]  Why?
[47:16.440 --> 47:22.440]  Because there is no other way that a living individual and the natural person or individual
[47:22.440 --> 47:30.460]  defined can coexist in a statutory definition with legal entities.
[47:30.460 --> 47:32.800]  And that's not my interpretation of it.
[47:32.800 --> 47:36.320]  That is the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of it.
[47:36.320 --> 47:43.620]  They say that anything that follows includes, okay, or including has to belong to the same
[47:43.620 --> 47:44.620]  class.
[47:44.620 --> 47:51.760]  There must be some similarity creating the class within which they fall, okay?
[47:51.760 --> 47:57.600]  Now when it says means, that's an exclusive list, which I said before.
[47:57.600 --> 48:06.520]  That meaning that an individual or living or a natural person in conjunction with legal
[48:06.520 --> 48:11.680]  entities, well, let's consider how that must actually operate.
[48:11.680 --> 48:15.400]  Legal entities in and of themselves cannot act.
[48:15.400 --> 48:18.560]  They can take no action whatsoever.
[48:18.560 --> 48:26.840]  They can't perform any physical written or any other kind of task.
[48:26.840 --> 48:28.200]  Can't do it.
[48:28.200 --> 48:29.780]  They are a fiction.
[48:29.780 --> 48:33.060]  They don't exist.
[48:33.060 --> 48:40.440]  They must be represented by agents and those agents can act in various capacities on its
[48:40.440 --> 48:53.080]  behalf and in its name, but it requires a living person, i.e. natural person or individual,
[48:53.080 --> 48:59.920]  a person who is born and is alive to perform those functions for its benefit or on its
[48:59.920 --> 49:01.160]  behalf.
[49:01.160 --> 49:03.460]  There's no way around that.
[49:03.460 --> 49:10.780]  That's the only reasonable way to interpret that definition so that there is a reconciliation
[49:10.780 --> 49:17.720]  between these very disparate types of things in law.
[49:17.720 --> 49:23.720]  It really couldn't be any simpler than that and it definitely can't be any more complicated
[49:23.720 --> 49:26.520]  than that, okay?
[49:26.520 --> 49:29.240]  It's just really the only way it can work.
[49:29.240 --> 49:31.980]  The legal entity cannot act for itself.
[49:31.980 --> 49:39.440]  It must always have an agent and that's exactly why the statute includes living person in
[49:39.440 --> 49:47.580]  the form of individual or natural person, okay?
[49:47.580 --> 49:48.580]  Can't get around that.
[49:48.580 --> 49:51.080]  No other way it works.
[49:51.080 --> 49:57.600]  Now when you get through those aspects of the various codes and how the definitions
[49:57.600 --> 50:02.800]  work and by the way, you can use chapter 311 and 312 of the Texas government code to ascertain
[50:02.800 --> 50:08.280]  exactly how the law requires you to read a statute and interpret a statute, just like
[50:08.280 --> 50:13.280]  it requires the courts to read and interpret a statute, just exactly how it instructs the
[50:13.280 --> 50:20.640]  legislature in chapter 312 to write a statute and how they are bound to write it, okay?
[50:20.640 --> 50:28.340]  So when you put all that together and you find out that the transportation code is limited
[50:28.340 --> 50:34.840]  to a specific agency whose authority is limited to a specific form of regulation for a specific
[50:34.840 --> 50:41.240]  purpose, none of which applies to the general public, then you cannot help but reach the
[50:41.240 --> 50:47.960]  conclusion that someone is lying to you.
[50:47.960 --> 50:52.760]  Or they've missed something entirely and you're still going to be the one on the hook for
[50:52.760 --> 50:56.780]  it when somebody figures out what it is, okay?
[50:56.780 --> 51:01.240]  Because remember, you can't point a finger at your boss when your boss has plausible
[51:01.240 --> 51:04.200]  deniability in saying, I never taught you that.
[51:04.200 --> 51:07.360]  I never told you not to go read it yourself.
[51:07.360 --> 51:11.120]  I never told you to take my word for this being the only way that this read.
[51:11.120 --> 51:15.200]  I simply said that under general terms, this is how it works and this is what your duties
[51:15.200 --> 51:20.400]  are and how it works, and you had the responsibility to make sure you were doing your job properly.
[51:20.400 --> 51:27.240]  Therefore, officer, I'm not taking accountability for what you did by choosing to remain ignorant
[51:27.240 --> 51:30.280]  of your legal authority and duty under the law.
[51:30.280 --> 51:36.140]  Hence my statement to my cousin that they are setting you guys up as cannon fodder because
[51:36.140 --> 51:41.040]  I guarantee you if the crap hits the fan, that is the first thing they're doing is throwing
[51:41.040 --> 51:49.840]  the enforcement guys under the bus by saying, we deny all liability for your actions, okay?
[51:49.840 --> 51:54.700]  Now this is of course after they've attempted to exhaust all the usual immunity claims and
[51:54.700 --> 51:59.600]  so on and so forth, but when there's no law supporting what the officer did, there's no
[51:59.600 --> 52:05.760]  law authorizing what the officer did, there is no discretion in what the officer did,
[52:05.760 --> 52:11.680]  there is no immunity for what the officer did, and they're not going to be able to stop
[52:11.680 --> 52:17.400]  that provided you argue it correctly and you destroy their immunity correctly by pointing
[52:17.400 --> 52:18.400]  out.
[52:18.400 --> 52:21.800]  The law does not authorize immunity in this case because the law is very clear and specific.
[52:21.800 --> 52:24.240]  The officer must have been certified.
[52:24.240 --> 52:26.200]  This officer is not certified.
[52:26.200 --> 52:30.120]  His municipality or county must have had that reciprocity agreement letter, which they do
[52:30.120 --> 52:31.220]  not have.
[52:31.220 --> 52:34.540]  The Department of Public Safety says they have no record showing this officer was ever
[52:34.540 --> 52:39.220]  trained to enforce the transportation code, hence he was illegally impersonating one of
[52:39.220 --> 52:41.240]  their authorized agents.
[52:41.240 --> 52:49.220]  He's guilty of felony offenses in and of their own selves.
[52:49.220 --> 52:52.980]  There's not going to be any immunity that can attach to them when you throw those arguments
[52:52.980 --> 52:59.800]  out there tied together in a neat little package like that that they cannot use any law to
[52:59.800 --> 53:02.760]  destroy because there isn't any.
[53:02.760 --> 53:09.760]  The law does not contain what they say it contains, and I'm telling you exactly where
[53:09.760 --> 53:10.760]  to go verify that.
[53:10.760 --> 53:14.880]  I have told you every place to go look for it.
[53:14.880 --> 53:20.020]  But you would be astounded at the number of people who still won't do their own due diligence
[53:20.020 --> 53:26.160]  in looking it up and verifying what I've said, especially on the side that's profiting from
[53:26.160 --> 53:29.760]  it being wrong.
[53:29.760 --> 53:36.320]  The attorneys don't care because their money is coming from those that are being defrauded.
[53:36.320 --> 53:41.180]  So why should they give that up when they have plausible deniability because the courts
[53:41.180 --> 53:44.120]  all say so?
[53:44.120 --> 53:48.620]  And the courts are obfuscating and abrogating everything that comes in there by switching
[53:48.620 --> 53:52.980]  the terminology around to the statutory terms without any evidence whatsoever that those
[53:52.980 --> 53:59.720]  terms apply because no one has provided any evidence that the subject matter under which
[53:59.720 --> 54:07.080]  those terms rest itself applied.
[54:07.080 --> 54:09.920]  Because it doesn't.
[54:09.920 --> 54:18.080]  Everything they do in a transportation case is entirely 100% legal presumption, legal
[54:18.080 --> 54:27.980]  conclusion and personal opinion, none of which are admissible in a court of law as evidence
[54:27.980 --> 54:30.080]  that can support a conviction.
[54:30.080 --> 54:35.480]  And yet it is the only thing being offered on that witness stand every single time the
[54:35.480 --> 54:38.840]  cop gets up there.
[54:38.840 --> 54:41.960]  Now here's the other thing.
[54:41.960 --> 54:47.360]  There also comes the issue of the fraud that the state itself is perpetrating and what
[54:47.360 --> 54:51.700]  it tells the officers to tell the individual receiving the citation.
[54:51.700 --> 54:55.320]  Now since the Department of Public Safety is a state administrative agency, they are
[54:55.320 --> 55:00.660]  subject to the State Administrative Procedures Act, chapter 2001 of the Texas Government
[55:00.660 --> 55:03.120]  Code.
[55:03.120 --> 55:10.800]  As an agency subject to the Texas Administrative Procedures Act, anything they have authority
[55:10.800 --> 55:19.640]  over requires an administrative hearing to be performed.
[55:19.640 --> 55:25.460]  But the way they have arranged it in Texas is that the individual must be the one who
[55:25.460 --> 55:31.100]  requests the hearing in order to get it.
[55:31.100 --> 55:34.380]  But here is where the gigantic fraud is coming in.
[55:34.380 --> 55:40.880]  Peace officers are not, including the DPS, is not telling someone anything at all about
[55:40.880 --> 55:46.180]  the administrative procedure or the right to a hearing under the Administrative Procedures
[55:46.180 --> 55:49.300]  Act.
[55:49.300 --> 55:58.100]  They are instead specifically referring the individual to a court that does not have proper
[55:58.100 --> 55:59.100]  jurisdiction.
[55:59.100 --> 56:00.100]  Why?
[56:00.100 --> 56:02.420]  Because that court is criminal, not administrative.
[56:02.420 --> 56:06.980]  It is not the State Office of Administrative Hearings, which is the only office that can
[56:06.980 --> 56:12.200]  hear the administrative issues in the case.
[56:12.200 --> 56:16.260]  So the person being accused is not being informed of the administrative option.
[56:16.260 --> 56:20.900]  They're given no information relating to the administrative option, they are giving no
[56:20.900 --> 56:26.440]  opportunity to seek the administrative option, nothing on the citation informs them about
[56:26.440 --> 56:32.260]  the administrative option, and the court that they go into never mentions the administrative
[56:32.260 --> 56:33.260]  option.
[56:33.260 --> 56:38.580]  Now, if you or I were to do this by filing suit in the federal court, they would kick
[56:38.580 --> 56:45.780]  it out automatically by saying, we had failed to invoke and get all administrative remedy
[56:45.780 --> 56:47.480]  in the state.
[56:47.480 --> 56:53.020]  The Fed can't hear our case because we have not exhausted our administrative remedies
[56:53.020 --> 56:56.460]  for them to have jurisdiction to hear the issue.
[56:56.460 --> 57:01.500]  Yet here we are going into a municipal or JP court minus the administrative hearing
[57:01.500 --> 57:10.020]  that we're never ever told about by an administrative agency that's required to have such a hearing.
[57:10.020 --> 57:13.920]  But here becomes issue number two.
[57:13.920 --> 57:18.020]  Not only is the State Office of Administrative Hearings supposed to be where we are sent
[57:18.020 --> 57:24.400]  to have an administrative hearing on the issue, administrative hearings are 100% civil, not
[57:24.400 --> 57:27.260]  criminal.
[57:27.260 --> 57:36.140]  So how then does an issue that is initially administrative, i.e. civil in its entirety,
[57:36.140 --> 57:43.620]  get converted into something that is criminal either before or after the conclusion or completely
[57:43.620 --> 57:48.340]  without any conclusion of an administrative hearing?
[57:48.340 --> 57:52.060]  How does the civil action suddenly become a criminal action?
[57:52.060 --> 57:54.760]  No one seems to be capable of explaining this.
[57:54.760 --> 58:02.380]  No one seems to be able to find any law where the one can be reconciled with the other.
[58:02.380 --> 58:08.740]  And yet here we are being sent to criminal courts that allegedly have jurisdiction for
[58:08.740 --> 58:14.580]  class C fine only offenses that are defined in statute, but these class C fine only offenses
[58:14.580 --> 58:22.220]  in statute are governed by an administrative agency who must provide an administrative
[58:22.220 --> 58:25.940]  hearing for punitive actions under that regulatory code.
[58:25.940 --> 58:28.140]  Go figure.
[58:28.140 --> 58:33.940]  I say we have a problem and I would say we now know why we have a problem.
[58:33.940 --> 58:36.800]  It's because of the attorneys.
[58:36.800 --> 58:42.800]  This has been, always will be, it's not the Queen of England, it's not the Pope, okay?
[58:42.800 --> 58:43.800]  It's the attorneys.
[58:43.800 --> 58:50.240]  All right folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang in there.
[58:50.240 --> 58:55.660]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.660 --> 58:58.460]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.460 --> 59:03.860]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:03.860 --> 59:07.100]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.100 --> 59:08.860]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.860 --> 59:14.800]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.800 --> 59:18.540]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.540 --> 59:23.540]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.540 --> 59:27.980]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.980 --> 59:33.380]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.380 --> 59:43.820]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.820 --> 59:47.900]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.900 --> 59:48.900]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:48.900 --> 01:00:02.740]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:02.740 --> 01:00:07.940]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[01:00:07.940 --> 01:00:15.540]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[01:00:15.540 --> 01:00:23.700]  into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:23.700 --> 01:00:31.220]  Markets for the 11th of April, 2018, closed with gold at $1,353.22 an ounce, silver, $16.68
[01:00:31.220 --> 01:00:41.340]  an ounce, Texas crude, $65.51 a barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum's at $420.80, bitcoin
[01:00:41.340 --> 01:00:55.580]  cash is at $652.90, and finally litecoins at $114.34, a crypto coin.
[01:00:55.580 --> 01:01:01.260]  Today in history, the year 1968, President Lyndon Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act
[01:01:01.260 --> 01:01:06.340]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color,
[01:01:06.340 --> 01:01:08.060]  religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:01:08.060 --> 01:01:13.220]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:01:13.220 --> 01:01:18.340]  in public schools and employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:01:18.340 --> 01:01:23.980]  Today in history.
[01:01:23.980 --> 01:01:28.020]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:01:28.020 --> 01:01:32.300]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:01:32.300 --> 01:01:36.740]  is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:01:36.740 --> 01:01:41.500]  United States, and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:01:41.500 --> 01:01:43.380]  evidence as of yet.
[01:01:43.380 --> 01:01:46.860]  President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday, that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down
[01:01:46.860 --> 01:01:51.220]  any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready Russia, because they will be coming in nice
[01:01:51.220 --> 01:01:52.940]  and new and smart.
[01:01:52.940 --> 01:01:56.460]  Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who
[01:01:56.460 --> 01:01:58.620]  kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:01:58.620 --> 01:02:02.660]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[01:02:02.660 --> 01:02:06.820]  attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[01:02:06.820 --> 01:02:11.100]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the Organization
[01:02:11.100 --> 01:02:15.900]  for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to investigate the site of the chemical slaughter.
[01:02:15.900 --> 01:02:19.420]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil
[01:02:19.420 --> 01:02:24.060]  war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[01:02:24.060 --> 01:02:28.820]  rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[01:02:28.820 --> 01:02:32.580]  notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:32.580 --> 01:02:37.900]  No surprise, then, why Russian Foreign Minister spokeswoman Marya Zakhova posted on Facebook
[01:02:37.900 --> 01:02:42.940]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government which has
[01:02:42.940 --> 01:02:44.440]  been fighting terrorists.
[01:02:44.440 --> 01:02:48.260]  Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike and then there will
[01:02:48.260 --> 01:02:53.380]  be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:03:18.260 --> 01:03:22.180]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:03:22.180 --> 01:03:25.900]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig.
[01:03:25.900 --> 01:03:28.660]  Okay, now the phone lines are on.
[01:03:28.660 --> 01:03:36.220]  Call our number is 512-646-1984 if you want to call and get in line and talk about something.
[01:03:36.220 --> 01:03:41.860]  Now while we're waiting on someone to do that, I want to go ahead and expound on that a little
[01:03:41.860 --> 01:03:46.360]  bit about what I was saying before we went to break and that the majority of the issues
[01:03:46.360 --> 01:03:49.180]  we're having is the attorneys.
[01:03:49.180 --> 01:03:53.040]  That's an irrefutable fact.
[01:03:53.040 --> 01:04:03.320]  We know this because the only people authorized, illegally authorized no less, to create precedent
[01:04:03.320 --> 01:04:10.660]  and to sit in any position of power with the entire judicial department of government is
[01:04:10.660 --> 01:04:15.860]  required to be an attorney by law, of course the laws having been written and put in place
[01:04:15.860 --> 01:04:21.540]  by other attorneys, possibly even some of the same ones that are now profiting from
[01:04:21.540 --> 01:04:24.860]  those laws.
[01:04:24.860 --> 01:04:32.980]  So the fact is that we have unconstitutional usurpation of power and authority that has
[01:04:32.980 --> 01:04:40.700]  removed the entire judicial department and any office of power and authority in that
[01:04:40.700 --> 01:04:47.540]  department from access of the people, by the people, for the people.
[01:04:47.540 --> 01:04:57.320]  You and I cannot sit in any position of any power and authority in the entire judicial
[01:04:57.320 --> 01:04:59.540]  branch of our own government.
[01:04:59.540 --> 01:05:04.420]  Something else I've said before, the attorneys have completely usurped that power and given
[01:05:04.420 --> 01:05:06.860]  it only to themselves.
[01:05:06.860 --> 01:05:13.580]  On top of that, the majority of the legislature is now completely manned by attorneys and
[01:05:13.580 --> 01:05:22.180]  the main offices of the legislative department are controlled by attorneys.
[01:05:22.180 --> 01:05:28.180]  Your governor is an attorney, your attorney general is an attorney, hell, I think even
[01:05:28.180 --> 01:05:31.860]  your secretary of state is an attorney.
[01:05:31.860 --> 01:05:36.420]  All of these people in all of these various departments who are actually members of one
[01:05:36.420 --> 01:05:45.700]  department, the judicial department, that are unconstitutionally violating the separation
[01:05:45.700 --> 01:05:48.460]  of powers clause.
[01:05:48.460 --> 01:05:53.860]  Under Article 2 of the Texas Constitution, no person or group of persons may exercise
[01:05:53.860 --> 01:06:00.100]  the power and authority of any person or office belonging to any other department.
[01:06:00.100 --> 01:06:05.700]  Department in this case meaning branch, i.e. legislative, executive, and judicial.
[01:06:05.700 --> 01:06:12.580]  Now by law, every attorney is a judicial officer under the state bar act, okay?
[01:06:12.580 --> 01:06:20.980]  Let's see, chapter 81 and 82 of the Texas government code, state bar act, and the bar
[01:06:20.980 --> 01:06:28.460]  associations, you will find in those chapters that every attorney is a judicial officer.
[01:06:28.460 --> 01:06:35.620]  That the entire bar is created as an administrative office within the judicial department of government.
[01:06:35.620 --> 01:06:44.180]  Meaning, every bar card carrying attorney is a judicial office member, and yet they
[01:06:44.180 --> 01:06:56.100]  occupy offices and exercise power belonging to other offices in other departments, okay?
[01:06:56.100 --> 01:07:02.340]  A complete and total violation of the Texas Constitution separation of powers clause.
[01:07:02.340 --> 01:07:07.940]  This means that the people no longer have control of their government, it is now controlled
[01:07:07.940 --> 01:07:16.120]  entirely by an oligarchy of one profession only, okay?
[01:07:16.120 --> 01:07:19.100]  That of attorneys.
[01:07:19.100 --> 01:07:24.340]  This is not how this is supposed to work at all.
[01:07:24.340 --> 01:07:31.680]  The Texas Constitution also forbids any member of the legislature from voting on any bill
[01:07:31.680 --> 01:07:36.060]  wherein they may have a personal or financial interest.
[01:07:36.060 --> 01:07:41.800]  Yet every attorney in the legislature voted to approve the state bar act back in 1939,
[01:07:41.800 --> 01:07:43.720]  every single attorney.
[01:07:43.720 --> 01:07:48.620]  Every single attorney since has controlled the sunset committee.
[01:07:48.620 --> 01:07:53.780]  The sunset committee is comprised almost entirely of attorneys voting on whether or not the
[01:07:53.780 --> 01:07:59.100]  state bar act should be sunsetted so that they no longer have control of the profession.
[01:07:59.100 --> 01:08:04.900]  When you have a bunch of attorneys voting on this, again, a complete violation of the
[01:08:04.900 --> 01:08:10.220]  Texas Constitution's prohibition clauses.
[01:08:10.220 --> 01:08:15.700]  What is it going to take to wake you people up to the facts and reality of what is happening
[01:08:15.700 --> 01:08:17.800]  and who is doing it?
[01:08:17.800 --> 01:08:21.180]  The queen of England and the pope be damned.
[01:08:21.180 --> 01:08:22.740]  They're not here.
[01:08:22.740 --> 01:08:26.980]  They're not doing this.
[01:08:26.980 --> 01:08:34.260]  The criminals and culprits are right under your nose.
[01:08:34.260 --> 01:08:39.980]  They're hiding in plain sight and they're committing their high crimes and misdemeanors
[01:08:39.980 --> 01:08:48.340]  in broad daylight with your approval.
[01:08:48.340 --> 01:08:53.740]  And you think you have a reason to complain?
[01:08:53.740 --> 01:09:00.540]  I mean, just like I said, how many times do you have to be put through the same stupid
[01:09:00.540 --> 01:09:06.100]  situation and the same pain and the same penalty before you realize that the person subjecting
[01:09:06.100 --> 01:09:09.300]  you to it is not your friend?
[01:09:09.300 --> 01:09:10.620]  That they're not there to help you.
[01:09:10.620 --> 01:09:14.420]  They're not there to do it right and they could care less about you and your wellbeing
[01:09:14.420 --> 01:09:19.580]  and anything to do with you as long as they're getting what they want out of it in the end.
[01:09:19.580 --> 01:09:25.540]  Well, that ladies and gentlemen is exactly where you're at.
[01:09:25.540 --> 01:09:31.420]  Now there is an individual who is trying to get a bill passed through the legislature,
[01:09:31.420 --> 01:09:35.620]  which one, I doubt very seriously he's going to be successful in any way, shape or form
[01:09:35.620 --> 01:09:44.500]  because this alleged premise of this bill is to authorize anyone regardless of their,
[01:09:44.500 --> 01:09:49.020]  now get this, this is exactly how it was worded when it was put to me, regardless of their
[01:09:49.020 --> 01:09:52.980]  formal or where they received their formal education.
[01:09:52.980 --> 01:09:59.800]  Now you know damn good and well how an attorney is going to spend the phrase formal education.
[01:09:59.800 --> 01:10:05.860]  They're going to say that means a college degree from some college with whatever, you
[01:10:05.860 --> 01:10:09.540]  know, that's how they're going to interpret it yet.
[01:10:09.540 --> 01:10:10.540]  It's being insisted.
[01:10:10.540 --> 01:10:12.380]  That's not how it's going to play out.
[01:10:12.380 --> 01:10:14.280]  Okay, whatever.
[01:10:14.280 --> 01:10:17.620]  Let's assume that even that is correct.
[01:10:17.620 --> 01:10:21.720]  Even if that is not how the terminology is going to be interpreted, you are asking the
[01:10:21.720 --> 01:10:28.700]  very people who have rigged the system in their favor, guaranteed them an exclusive
[01:10:28.700 --> 01:10:35.060]  on the market of the practice of law, limited the number of people that can participate
[01:10:35.060 --> 01:10:43.080]  in that market and provide competition to their income level and wellbeing financially
[01:10:43.080 --> 01:10:50.200]  and you and they're acting illegally by even voting on any such bill to begin with because
[01:10:50.200 --> 01:10:56.380]  it has a direct conflict of interest issue with what they do and how they do it and you
[01:10:56.380 --> 01:11:03.300]  honestly think it stands a chance of getting enacted.
[01:11:03.300 --> 01:11:11.080]  I want some of whatever you're smoking because that stuff is good.
[01:11:11.080 --> 01:11:19.340]  It's got to be because this is exactly what you're attempting to get those in the system
[01:11:19.340 --> 01:11:28.100]  to do to themselves and I just don't see that after all the work they put into seizing the
[01:11:28.100 --> 01:11:29.400]  control that they have.
[01:11:29.400 --> 01:11:34.260]  You're going to ask them to give it up and they're just going to go, Oh, okay, let's
[01:11:34.260 --> 01:11:37.020]  look a good idea.
[01:11:37.020 --> 01:11:39.100]  I want everybody to be able to compete with me in this field.
[01:11:39.100 --> 01:11:42.980]  I think we need some honesty, integrity in this here career field that we've got chosen
[01:11:42.980 --> 01:11:46.100]  for ourselves where we make all of this money at the public expense.
[01:11:46.100 --> 01:11:50.100]  I think we can have people come in here that'll do the job just fine as long as they're willing
[01:11:50.100 --> 01:11:58.220]  to play our game delusional much because that's what you're getting.
[01:11:58.220 --> 01:12:00.900]  It's not that I don't want to see that happen.
[01:12:00.900 --> 01:12:02.260]  I would love to see that happen.
[01:12:02.260 --> 01:12:03.700]  I just, I'm a realist.
[01:12:03.700 --> 01:12:07.860]  It's not going to happen.
[01:12:07.860 --> 01:12:12.340]  The only way that bill would ever get passed is to have every one of these people in the
[01:12:12.340 --> 01:12:17.820]  legislature have a gun barrel stuck in their ear or up their nose with a promise that the
[01:12:17.820 --> 01:12:24.660]  trigger will be pulled if this bill is not voted yes as the only way it's going to pass
[01:12:24.660 --> 01:12:32.180]  under the system that we have guaranteed.
[01:12:32.180 --> 01:12:37.740]  We have trusted the wrong people for far too long to do the right thing that they never
[01:12:37.740 --> 01:12:41.740]  intended to do in the first place.
[01:12:41.740 --> 01:12:50.900]  No matter what they told you, it was never what they intended to do.
[01:12:50.900 --> 01:12:55.340]  Now you think politicians are bad, well there are a hundred times worse when that politician
[01:12:55.340 --> 01:13:05.400]  is also an attorney and that's all Texas has and we are the ones being forced to pay the
[01:13:05.400 --> 01:13:08.980]  price for it to their benefit.
[01:13:08.980 --> 01:13:13.800]  I for one have not liked that concept for a very long time.
[01:13:13.800 --> 01:13:17.160]  That's the whole reason I'm here.
[01:13:17.160 --> 01:13:19.720]  I am trying to wake you up.
[01:13:19.720 --> 01:13:24.820]  I am trying to get you realize where your life is going and why and who is responsible
[01:13:24.820 --> 01:13:27.740]  for stealing it out from under you.
[01:13:27.740 --> 01:13:30.260]  But what good is it doing?
[01:13:30.260 --> 01:13:31.820]  What fight are you putting up?
[01:13:31.820 --> 01:13:34.480]  How much of this information are you sharing with others?
[01:13:34.480 --> 01:13:38.820]  How much of an effort are you making to educate yourself in such a way that when those other
[01:13:38.820 --> 01:13:46.300]  people actually have questions, you can answer that question intelligently so that they can
[01:13:46.300 --> 01:13:52.340]  see that you are somebody who understands what it is you're talking about.
[01:13:52.340 --> 01:13:57.900]  Something that very few people these days can actually do.
[01:13:57.900 --> 01:14:06.140]  Point you to their source of information and verify that that information is accurate,
[01:14:06.140 --> 01:14:11.660]  which most people won't do, which is another one of the big issues I have with the patron
[01:14:11.660 --> 01:14:15.900]  of community and attorneys in general.
[01:14:15.900 --> 01:14:25.380]  They only operate off of their perceptions, not reality, not the law, not the facts.
[01:14:25.380 --> 01:14:32.460]  If the facts don't meet their perceptions, their perception will be chosen over the facts
[01:14:32.460 --> 01:14:40.300]  regardless of what they are, especially if the result of those facts is detrimental to
[01:14:40.300 --> 01:14:46.100]  how they operate.
[01:14:46.100 --> 01:14:48.180]  There is no myth to this.
[01:14:48.180 --> 01:14:51.100]  There is no guesswork to this.
[01:14:51.100 --> 01:15:00.100]  It is as obvious as a sunrise on a clear day that when you take away all the illusion,
[01:15:00.100 --> 01:15:07.160]  what you're left with has fingers pointing at one group of people and one group of people
[01:15:07.160 --> 01:15:14.380]  only.
[01:15:14.380 --> 01:15:19.240]  And it's always the same one.
[01:15:19.240 --> 01:15:21.620]  So what do you do?
[01:15:21.620 --> 01:15:28.120]  Who do you turn to when the system is rigged against you for the benefit of a few at the
[01:15:28.120 --> 01:15:33.740]  expense of the many, how do you fix it?
[01:15:33.740 --> 01:15:38.380]  Simple answer is you're not going to, at least not the way they want you to try to fix it,
[01:15:38.380 --> 01:15:40.880]  which is the one that they control.
[01:15:40.880 --> 01:15:45.020]  The only way it's going to get fixed is to go beyond their ability to control it, to
[01:15:45.020 --> 01:15:51.060]  do it in a way that they can't control, that they don't have a say-so over.
[01:15:51.060 --> 01:15:56.220]  Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the actual basis for the Second Amendment.
[01:15:56.220 --> 01:16:03.220]  Ding, ding, ding, do we have any bells going off anybody's head yet?
[01:16:03.220 --> 01:16:06.940]  So when someone wants to argue about the gun control issue, well right there you have the
[01:16:06.940 --> 01:16:12.360]  actual basis for why that's the wrong argument to be making when you say, it's for hunting,
[01:16:12.360 --> 01:16:16.340]  it's for self-defense, it's for protection from hostile environments and blah, blah,
[01:16:16.340 --> 01:16:17.340]  blah.
[01:16:17.340 --> 01:16:18.340]  No, it's not.
[01:16:18.340 --> 01:16:22.300]  It is so that we can retake our government from the hands of those that would take from
[01:16:22.300 --> 01:16:27.020]  us that to which we are rightly entitled as the people.
[01:16:27.020 --> 01:16:36.420]  By whatever means is left to us to do it when they refuse to give it back willingly.
[01:16:36.420 --> 01:16:37.420]  That's what it's for.
[01:16:37.420 --> 01:16:44.140]  It's not a talking point, it's not a vote issue, it's not an election issue, it's a
[01:16:44.140 --> 01:16:51.460]  rights issue, it's a freedom issue, it's a liberty issue.
[01:16:51.460 --> 01:16:53.020]  So start acting like it.
[01:16:53.020 --> 01:16:56.380]  All right folks, I'll start taking your calls on the other side.
[01:16:56.380 --> 01:17:03.900]  Y'all hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:17:03.900 --> 01:17:10.420]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway, sponsored by Central Texas
[01:17:10.420 --> 01:17:11.420]  Gunworks.
[01:17:11.420 --> 01:17:15.340]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:15.340 --> 01:17:18.820]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:18.820 --> 01:17:25.580]  From Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[01:17:25.580 --> 01:17:28.360]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:28.360 --> 01:17:34.460]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:34.460 --> 01:17:38.340]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:38.340 --> 01:17:42.220]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:42.220 --> 01:17:47.420]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can
[01:17:47.420 --> 01:17:51.940]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:17:51.940 --> 01:17:55.140]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.140 --> 01:18:00.420]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.420 --> 01:18:01.540]  I love Logos.
[01:18:01.540 --> 01:18:04.940]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.940 --> 01:18:07.580]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.580 --> 01:18:08.820]  I need my truth fixed.
[01:18:08.820 --> 01:18:13.500]  I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.500 --> 01:18:17.240]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[01:18:17.240 --> 01:18:20.620]  have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.620 --> 01:18:22.100]  How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.100 --> 01:18:24.180]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.180 --> 01:18:28.460]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies
[01:18:28.460 --> 01:18:29.460]  or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.460 --> 01:18:31.620]  The first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.620 --> 01:18:38.020]  Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.020 --> 01:18:43.660]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.660 --> 01:18:44.660]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.660 --> 01:18:45.660]  No.
[01:18:45.660 --> 01:18:47.380]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.380 --> 01:18:48.380]  No.
[01:18:48.380 --> 01:18:49.380]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.380 --> 01:18:50.380]  No.
[01:18:50.380 --> 01:18:51.380]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.380 --> 01:18:56.140]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:56.140 --> 01:18:57.140]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.140 --> 01:18:58.140]  You're welcome.
[01:18:58.140 --> 01:18:59.140]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:59.140 --> 01:19:23.260]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:23.260 --> 01:19:28.300]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I take a look at my life and realize
[01:19:28.300 --> 01:19:29.300]  there's nothing left.
[01:19:29.300 --> 01:19:34.380]  Because I've been prancing and laughing so long that even my mama thinks that my mind
[01:19:34.380 --> 01:19:35.380]  is gone.
[01:19:35.380 --> 01:19:38.220]  But I ain't never crossed a man that didn't deserve it.
[01:19:38.220 --> 01:19:41.460]  Me be treated like a punk, you know that's unheard of.
[01:19:41.460 --> 01:19:45.820]  You better watch how you're talking and where you're walking, or you and your homies might
[01:19:45.820 --> 01:19:46.820]  be lying in shock.
[01:19:46.820 --> 01:19:49.080]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:49.080 --> 01:19:50.660]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:50.660 --> 01:19:57.980]  The call in number 512646 1984, if you want to call in and get in line and ask a question
[01:19:57.980 --> 01:19:59.900]  or something like that.
[01:19:59.900 --> 01:20:02.780]  Right now, we have James in Texas.
[01:20:02.780 --> 01:20:05.060]  James, what can we do for you?
[01:20:05.060 --> 01:20:07.820]  And please try to keep it short because I got a full caller board.
[01:20:07.820 --> 01:20:11.820]  Yeah, this is going to be real short, Eddie.
[01:20:11.820 --> 01:20:17.180]  Have you had a chance to tell me last week you were rewriting the constitutional challenge
[01:20:17.180 --> 01:20:18.180]  motion?
[01:20:18.180 --> 01:20:20.540]  Yeah, I spent the whole day on that today.
[01:20:20.540 --> 01:20:24.540]  I'm not so much rewriting and just trying to figure out which version is the correct
[01:20:24.540 --> 01:20:25.540]  one.
[01:20:25.540 --> 01:20:31.500]  Like, nine or 10 different versions of that I was writing in stages over time.
[01:20:31.500 --> 01:20:36.340]  One of them is one that I was satisfied was complete enough to include up until I could
[01:20:36.340 --> 01:20:39.960]  finish the other stuff I was working on with it.
[01:20:39.960 --> 01:20:45.300]  But now I'm at a point where I no longer can find the original zipped up package I had
[01:20:45.300 --> 01:20:47.660]  to send out to people.
[01:20:47.660 --> 01:20:52.420]  So now I'm having to go through each of those versions because the dates are all so intermixed
[01:20:52.420 --> 01:20:57.060]  and find out which one was the correct one I had included so that I send out the right
[01:20:57.060 --> 01:20:58.060]  one.
[01:20:58.060 --> 01:21:01.340]  I don't want to send somebody the wrong one that's not complete.
[01:21:01.340 --> 01:21:06.820]  And so I've got so many copies of it in different variations that I've got to find the right
[01:21:06.820 --> 01:21:07.820]  one.
[01:21:07.820 --> 01:21:13.140]  I apologize for the delay, but I would much rather, you know, send you the right one than
[01:21:13.140 --> 01:21:15.980]  have you send something that's going to wind up causing a problem.
[01:21:15.980 --> 01:21:17.700]  Well, I agree.
[01:21:17.700 --> 01:21:23.820]  And I'm going to be turning in my first round of paperwork Wednesday.
[01:21:23.820 --> 01:21:32.260]  You know, the citation is invalid pursuant to 708.105.
[01:21:32.260 --> 01:21:38.420]  Yeah, that's one of two probable statutes that's in violation of.
[01:21:38.420 --> 01:21:42.380]  There's a 601.053 will probably be the other one.
[01:21:42.380 --> 01:21:45.580]  Okay, I'll check into that one too.
[01:21:45.580 --> 01:21:51.340]  But, uh, anyway, that's all, uh, really the only other thing I had, unless, uh, you want
[01:21:51.340 --> 01:21:54.260]  that boot and I brought for you, sign me an Austin.
[01:21:54.260 --> 01:21:55.260]  Uh, sure.
[01:21:55.260 --> 01:21:57.380]  I'll never pass up good boot in.
[01:21:57.380 --> 01:22:03.740]  If you, if you'll just write my phone number down or whatever and send me a text or whatever,
[01:22:03.740 --> 01:22:04.900]  I've got to go to San Marcos.
[01:22:04.900 --> 01:22:07.660]  I got to be there at six in the morning.
[01:22:07.660 --> 01:22:08.660]  Six AM.
[01:22:08.660 --> 01:22:09.660]  Yeah.
[01:22:09.660 --> 01:22:13.140]  To pick up my daughter's, uh, she's at orientation.
[01:22:13.140 --> 01:22:15.780]  Well, you, you have my number, right?
[01:22:15.780 --> 01:22:20.380]  No, that's why I say, and I don't want you to give it to me over there, but if you just
[01:22:20.380 --> 01:22:25.580]  want to write my number down and send me a text, I'll be back here by nine or 10 o'clock.
[01:22:25.580 --> 01:22:29.860]  Um, are you, when you say write it down, does that mean you're going to give it to me now?
[01:22:29.860 --> 01:22:34.180]  Well, you don't have it on, you can't see it online.
[01:22:34.180 --> 01:22:37.660]  Uh, I can look, where do I need to look online?
[01:22:37.660 --> 01:22:41.140]  Well, I mean through the collar board.
[01:22:41.140 --> 01:22:42.140]  Oh, okay.
[01:22:42.140 --> 01:22:43.140]  Yeah.
[01:22:43.140 --> 01:22:44.140]  Yeah.
[01:22:44.140 --> 01:22:45.140]  All right.
[01:22:45.140 --> 01:22:46.140]  Uh, well I don't know.
[01:22:46.140 --> 01:22:48.340]  I don't never know if the number up there is one I can actually reach somebody on or
[01:22:48.340 --> 01:22:49.340]  not.
[01:22:49.340 --> 01:22:50.340]  Yeah.
[01:22:50.340 --> 01:22:54.940]  But, uh, I think it's the same one I sent you in that email should see.
[01:22:54.940 --> 01:22:55.940]  Okay.
[01:22:55.940 --> 01:22:58.300]  I'm telling you it's nine three six.
[01:22:58.300 --> 01:22:59.300]  Yeah.
[01:22:59.300 --> 01:23:00.300]  I got that part.
[01:23:00.300 --> 01:23:01.500]  Let me write it down the way it is.
[01:23:01.500 --> 01:23:04.980]  I don't want you to have to give it out on the air.
[01:23:04.980 --> 01:23:05.980]  Okay.
[01:23:05.980 --> 01:23:06.980]  Okay.
[01:23:06.980 --> 01:23:07.980]  I think I got it.
[01:23:07.980 --> 01:23:08.980]  Last digit seven, right?
[01:23:08.980 --> 01:23:09.980]  Yes, sir.
[01:23:09.980 --> 01:23:10.980]  Okay.
[01:23:10.980 --> 01:23:14.820]  And if you'll just send me a text or something tomorrow, like I said, I got to run, just
[01:23:14.820 --> 01:23:18.140]  pick the luggage up and then I'm going to be here sitting at my daughter's apartment
[01:23:18.140 --> 01:23:22.740]  till I got to leave about four to go back down there and pick her up to head back to
[01:23:22.740 --> 01:23:23.740]  Lufkin.
[01:23:23.740 --> 01:23:24.740]  Okay.
[01:23:24.740 --> 01:23:26.100]  I'll be happy to bring that to you.
[01:23:26.100 --> 01:23:27.100]  All right.
[01:23:27.100 --> 01:23:30.420]  I'll, I'll make sure to give you a call tomorrow and set up a place for that.
[01:23:30.420 --> 01:23:31.420]  All right.
[01:23:31.420 --> 01:23:32.740]  Well, I appreciate it.
[01:23:32.740 --> 01:23:33.740]  Yes, sir.
[01:23:33.740 --> 01:23:34.740]  Thank you.
[01:23:34.740 --> 01:23:35.740]  Bye.
[01:23:35.740 --> 01:23:36.740]  Bye bye.
[01:23:36.740 --> 01:23:37.740]  All right.
[01:23:37.740 --> 01:23:40.420]  Uh, being said, let's get to Adam in Texas.
[01:23:40.420 --> 01:23:42.540]  Adam, what can we do for you?
[01:23:42.540 --> 01:23:50.100]  Hey man, um, how do you get a certified copy of your driving record when you don't know
[01:23:50.100 --> 01:23:54.180]  your driver's license number and you don't know your audit number?
[01:23:54.180 --> 01:23:58.300]  It won't release anything to you because you lost your driver's license.
[01:23:58.300 --> 01:24:02.340]  Well, if you give them your name and address, they can look up the number.
[01:24:02.340 --> 01:24:03.340]  Okay.
[01:24:03.340 --> 01:24:06.260]  As a DPS office?
[01:24:06.260 --> 01:24:07.260]  Yeah.
[01:24:07.260 --> 01:24:11.140]  Make sure you take some identification, they can use either a state ID cause they'll cross
[01:24:11.140 --> 01:24:15.820]  match them and cross reference them if, if you've got both, uh, a birth certificate or
[01:24:15.820 --> 01:24:19.200]  something like that so they can verify and they should be able to look it up and tell
[01:24:19.200 --> 01:24:21.200]  you what it is.
[01:24:21.200 --> 01:24:22.200]  Okay.
[01:24:22.200 --> 01:24:27.060]  I can tell you what my number used to be from umpteen years ago, one zero one six three
[01:24:27.060 --> 01:24:28.060]  one seven eight
[01:24:28.060 --> 01:24:37.660]  All right, well looking into that, we're trying to get a certified copy of the driving record
[01:24:37.660 --> 01:24:45.020]  to establish the fact that it was, it, uh, expired naturally of natural causes.
[01:24:45.020 --> 01:24:52.820]  Um, uh, real quick, uh, on the topic of, uh, county tax assessor collectors, um, from what
[01:24:52.820 --> 01:25:00.260]  I read in the Texas, uh, property tax code, uh, subject for B eleven point one three J
[01:25:00.260 --> 01:25:11.180]  one is that under the residence residence homestead exemption, you can add up to, uh,
[01:25:11.180 --> 01:25:13.460]  no more than 20 acres.
[01:25:13.460 --> 01:25:20.100]  So what we're having is down here, we're having some problems with the county assessor collector
[01:25:20.100 --> 01:25:28.460]  not wanting to admit or recognize the fact that most of the, uh, homestead owners around
[01:25:28.460 --> 01:25:33.460]  the county, uh, can in fact add up to 20 acres on their homes that exempting.
[01:25:33.460 --> 01:25:35.500]  How do we get around this debacle?
[01:25:35.500 --> 01:25:38.060]  You sue the crap out of them.
[01:25:38.060 --> 01:25:39.060]  Lack of cooperation.
[01:25:39.060 --> 01:25:43.240]  Well, no, for violating the duties of their office.
[01:25:43.240 --> 01:25:44.500]  That's official oppression.
[01:25:44.500 --> 01:25:45.500]  That's a crime.
[01:25:45.500 --> 01:25:46.500]  Okay.
[01:25:46.500 --> 01:25:52.060]  It's a felony crime to boot or Eddie.
[01:25:52.060 --> 01:25:57.820]  Were you familiar with, with that, uh, clause in the, uh, Texas property tax code of the
[01:25:57.820 --> 01:25:58.820]  up to 28.
[01:25:58.820 --> 01:25:59.820]  Yeah.
[01:25:59.820 --> 01:26:03.580]  There, there also was a clause that says no tax assessment is valid if it's not signed
[01:26:03.580 --> 01:26:05.820]  by the officer that issued it.
[01:26:05.820 --> 01:26:06.820]  Okay.
[01:26:06.820 --> 01:26:16.260]  I guarantee you your tax assessment is not signed, signed by the, by anyone.
[01:26:16.260 --> 01:26:19.660]  Okay.
[01:26:19.660 --> 01:26:25.120]  But the law required, or at least it did, it required that whoever made the assessment
[01:26:25.120 --> 01:26:32.020]  had to sign off on that assessment and they could only do that after an in-person inspection.
[01:26:32.020 --> 01:26:33.020]  And okay.
[01:26:33.020 --> 01:26:36.420]  So that'd be the chief chief appraiser signing off on the assessments or not.
[01:26:36.420 --> 01:26:40.460]  Well, no, the chief appraiser would have to be the one that physically came to where the
[01:26:40.460 --> 01:26:43.020]  property is and inspected it inside and out.
[01:26:43.020 --> 01:26:44.900]  Now see, here's the problem.
[01:26:44.900 --> 01:26:49.180]  If the requirement is that the property must be inspected inside and out in order to properly
[01:26:49.180 --> 01:26:53.580]  assess it for the amount of tax, how then would a tax assessor have access to a private
[01:26:53.580 --> 01:26:58.300]  home for those purposes and not be in violation of the fourth and fifth amendment?
[01:26:58.300 --> 01:26:59.300]  Correct.
[01:26:59.300 --> 01:27:00.300]  Correct.
[01:27:00.300 --> 01:27:01.300]  Correct.
[01:27:01.300 --> 01:27:02.300]  Yeah.
[01:27:02.300 --> 01:27:03.300]  Okay.
[01:27:03.300 --> 01:27:07.140]  That's just another argument for why property taxes can't be applicable to private property
[01:27:07.140 --> 01:27:13.540]  belonging to an individual or a family rather than a legal entity because they have those
[01:27:13.540 --> 01:27:14.540]  protected rights.
[01:27:14.540 --> 01:27:16.540]  That's what a legal entity doesn't have.
[01:27:16.540 --> 01:27:17.540]  Correct.
[01:27:17.540 --> 01:27:18.540]  Yeah.
[01:27:18.540 --> 01:27:19.540]  Yeah.
[01:27:19.540 --> 01:27:22.780]  Cause it's your residence homestead extension.
[01:27:22.780 --> 01:27:23.780]  No.
[01:27:23.780 --> 01:27:24.780]  Residence is the wrong word.
[01:27:24.780 --> 01:27:26.780]  It is your domicile.
[01:27:26.780 --> 01:27:30.820]  There's an entire article on my legal blog about the difference between residence and
[01:27:30.820 --> 01:27:35.800]  domicile and it cites case law after case law after case law that says even though they're
[01:27:35.800 --> 01:27:41.060]  often used interchangeably, they are not at all the same thing in the eyes of the law.
[01:27:41.060 --> 01:27:42.540]  Not even close.
[01:27:42.540 --> 01:27:43.540]  Okay.
[01:27:43.540 --> 01:27:48.140]  Well, I was just using the terminology that was used in the Texas property tax.
[01:27:48.140 --> 01:27:49.140]  Correct.
[01:27:49.140 --> 01:27:56.060]  And it always uses residence, which is not what you have.
[01:27:56.060 --> 01:28:00.260]  So are there, are there homestead exemptions that supersede?
[01:28:00.260 --> 01:28:05.700]  There would not be a homestead exemption because a domicile is not a homestead.
[01:28:05.700 --> 01:28:06.700]  Correct.
[01:28:06.700 --> 01:28:07.700]  Okay.
[01:28:07.700 --> 01:28:08.700]  Oh yeah.
[01:28:08.700 --> 01:28:09.700]  All right.
[01:28:09.700 --> 01:28:10.700]  I got you on that.
[01:28:10.700 --> 01:28:11.700]  Yeah.
[01:28:11.700 --> 01:28:12.700]  Yeah.
[01:28:12.700 --> 01:28:13.700]  All right.
[01:28:13.700 --> 01:28:14.700]  Well, appreciate it, man.
[01:28:14.700 --> 01:28:15.700]  Appreciate it.
[01:28:15.700 --> 01:28:16.700]  Everything y'all do and uh, take the next caller.
[01:28:16.700 --> 01:28:17.700]  Thanks a lot, man.
[01:28:17.700 --> 01:28:18.700]  Yes sir.
[01:28:18.700 --> 01:28:19.700]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:28:19.700 --> 01:28:20.700]  All right.
[01:28:20.700 --> 01:28:21.700]  Now we have Jermaine in Alabama.
[01:28:21.700 --> 01:28:22.700]  Jermaine, what can we do for you?
[01:28:22.700 --> 01:28:23.700]  Hey, what's up Eric?
[01:28:23.700 --> 01:28:24.700]  Howdy, howdy.
[01:28:24.700 --> 01:28:25.700]  I'm gonna try to make this quick.
[01:28:25.700 --> 01:28:26.700]  All right.
[01:28:26.700 --> 01:28:27.700]  I'm trying to make this quick, real quick.
[01:28:27.700 --> 01:28:28.700]  I got it.
[01:28:28.700 --> 01:28:29.700]  I had a situation.
[01:28:29.700 --> 01:28:30.700]  I remember you did an archive and a while back ago, but I don't know exactly where to
[01:28:30.700 --> 01:28:31.700]  locate that archive.
[01:28:31.700 --> 01:28:32.700]  Okay.
[01:28:32.700 --> 01:28:33.700]  All right.
[01:28:33.700 --> 01:28:34.700]  I got it.
[01:28:34.700 --> 01:28:35.700]  I got it.
[01:28:35.700 --> 01:28:36.700]  I got it.
[01:28:36.700 --> 01:28:37.700]  I got it.
[01:28:37.700 --> 01:28:38.700]  I got it.
[01:28:38.700 --> 01:28:39.700]  I got it.
[01:28:39.700 --> 01:28:40.700]  I got it.
[01:28:40.700 --> 01:28:43.000]  I don't know exactly where to locate that archive.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:51.740]  I had a situation where in Kentucky, I filed a challenge to jurisdiction.
[01:28:51.740 --> 01:28:53.740]  Which jurisdiction?
[01:28:53.740 --> 01:29:00.560]  Uh, the subject matter, the court uh challenge the court's jurisdiction.
[01:29:00.560 --> 01:29:03.760]  Yeah, but there are three that you can challenge.
[01:29:03.760 --> 01:29:12.560]  matter in personam meaning personal over the over the body or the person and venue right well i
[01:29:12.560 --> 01:29:20.080]  challenged subject matter in persona okay and i did the i did the uh seven interrogatories
[01:29:20.080 --> 01:29:23.920]  well no wait a minute spoke about in your state is it civil or criminal
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:32.560]  uh well i don't i don't know if it's uh it's no it's uh it's civil in kentucky traffic is
[01:29:32.560 --> 01:29:39.760]  civil in kentucky yes it's civil in kentucky okay all right well hang on just a minute and
[01:29:39.760 --> 01:29:45.520]  we'll continue this uh question on the other side of the break okay all right folks this
[01:29:45.520 --> 01:29:51.440]  is rule of law radio the call-in number is 512-646-1984 i got two more segments to go
[01:29:51.440 --> 01:29:56.000]  so if you want to talk you need to get in line we'll be right back after this break so y'all hang on
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:30:05.840]  sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me whoever came up with that was
[01:30:05.840 --> 01:30:10.880]  sure wrong i'm dr catherine albrecht and i'll be back in a moment to explain how your first middle
[01:30:10.880 --> 01:30:17.040]  and last names can actually affect your mortality your search engine is watching you recording all
[01:30:17.040 --> 01:30:22.640]  your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information that's creepy but it
[01:30:22.640 --> 01:30:28.000]  doesn't have to be that way startpage.com is the world's most private search engine startpage
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:32.720]  doesn't store your ip address make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and they're
[01:30:32.720 --> 01:30:38.320]  third-party certified if you don't like big brothers spying on you start over with startpage
[01:30:38.320 --> 01:30:44.240]  great search results and total privacy startpage.com the world's most private search engine
[01:30:44.240 --> 01:30:49.520]  the initials of your name could significantly impact how long you live according to a university
[01:30:49.520 --> 01:30:56.960]  of california study positive initials like vip or ace could add more than four years to a man's life
[01:30:56.960 --> 01:31:03.600]  negative initials like pig or die could shorten a man's life by two years while women are less
[01:31:03.600 --> 01:31:08.560]  impacted by negative initials than men positive initials can add three years to their lives
[01:31:08.560 --> 01:31:13.120]  researchers believe initials are powerful symbols that affect how people are treated and how they
[01:31:13.120 --> 01:31:18.080]  feel about themselves and research supports it those with negative initials were more likely
[01:31:18.080 --> 01:31:23.360]  to commit suicide and die in accidents than those with positive initials so name your kids well
[01:31:23.920 --> 01:31:28.080]  i'm dr catherine albrecht more news and information at catherinealbrecht.com
[01:31:30.320 --> 01:31:36.080]  i lost my son my nephew my uncle my son on september 11th 2001 most people don't know
[01:31:36.080 --> 01:31:41.760]  that a third tower fell on september 11 world trade center seven a 47-story skyscraper was
[01:31:41.760 --> 01:31:46.240]  not hit by a plane although the official explanation is that fire brought down building
[01:31:46.240 --> 01:31:51.280]  seven over 1200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is
[01:31:51.280 --> 01:31:58.080]  more to the story bring justice to my son my uncle my nephew my son go to building what.org why it
[01:31:58.080 --> 01:32:03.040]  fell why it matters and what you can do hey it's danny here for hill country home improvements did
[01:32:03.040 --> 01:32:07.360]  your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms come on we all know the government
[01:32:07.360 --> 01:32:11.680]  caused it with their chem trails but good luck getting them to pay for it okay i might be kidding
[01:32:11.680 --> 01:32:15.920]  about the chem trails but i'm serious about your roof that's why you have insurance in hill
[01:32:15.920 --> 01:32:20.720]  country home improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense
[01:32:20.720 --> 01:32:25.680]  and we accept bitcoin as a multi-year a plus member of the better business bureau with zero
[01:32:25.680 --> 01:32:30.480]  complaints you can trust hill country home improvements to handle your claim and your roof
[01:32:30.480 --> 01:32:38.400]  right the first time just call 512-992-8745 or go to hill country home improvements.com mention
[01:32:38.400 --> 01:32:42.640]  the crypto show and get a hundred dollars off and we'll donate another hundred dollars to the logos
[01:32:42.640 --> 01:32:47.840]  radio network to help continue this programming so if those out of town roofers come knocking
[01:32:47.840 --> 01:32:56.720]  your door should be locking that's 512-992-8745 or hill country home improvements.com discounts
[01:32:56.720 --> 01:33:00.560]  are based on full roof replacement may not actually be kidding about chem trails
[01:33:00.560 --> 01:33:11.520]  you're listening to the logos radio network at logosradionetwork.com
[01:33:30.560 --> 01:33:39.520]  so
[01:34:01.200 --> 01:34:09.520]  maybe
[01:34:19.360 --> 01:34:26.560]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio calling number 512-646-1984
[01:34:26.560 --> 01:34:32.240]  and we are talking to Jermaine in Alabama. All right Jermaine please continue.
[01:34:33.600 --> 01:34:39.520]  Okay all right uh uh just let you know I'm uh I'm currently living in Alabama but I have
[01:34:39.520 --> 01:34:43.840]  I was actually my license and everything was out of Tennessee. Okay. But I ended up getting that
[01:34:43.840 --> 01:34:50.800]  ticket in Kentucky. Well Kentucky uh found a talented subject matter in persona they never
[01:34:50.800 --> 01:34:57.360]  responded they went straight and petitioned the state of Tennessee to suspend my license so what
[01:34:57.360 --> 01:35:03.120]  I did was I took that notice and they said I had 30 days to respond I responded to the state of
[01:35:03.120 --> 01:35:08.880]  Tennessee I got the uh register mail receipt and everything I asked them that because they use a
[01:35:08.880 --> 01:35:16.320]  pseudo title and no agent no no id nobody with no signature no agent name or anything so I told
[01:35:16.320 --> 01:35:21.760]  myself I don't know who I'm speaking with using a pseudo title can you identify an agent who I
[01:35:21.760 --> 01:35:28.880]  can properly respond to and I told him like what Randy told me to them that they um that their
[01:35:28.880 --> 01:35:34.800]  notice was premature because they they said that the situation was still pending in Kentucky so I
[01:35:34.800 --> 01:35:40.080]  told them that unless they had a receipt of a judgment that their notice is premature and if
[01:35:40.080 --> 01:35:49.520]  they if they uh didn't accept my offer again they abandoned all claims for me to uh I think I said
[01:35:49.520 --> 01:35:54.960]  they abandoned that the demands that they're asking upon me so they never responded but
[01:35:54.960 --> 01:36:01.280]  Tennessee just straight suspended my license. Yeah well the Tennessee acted on uh illegally
[01:36:01.280 --> 01:36:06.560]  according to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has ruled in numerous cases that a
[01:36:06.560 --> 01:36:13.360]  state cannot suspend a license without a hearing period. Now did the state of Tennessee notify you
[01:36:13.360 --> 01:36:19.600]  of your right to an administrative hearing prior to the suspension? Yeah they they they they said
[01:36:19.600 --> 01:36:28.960]  I could they said I could request a hearing. Did you? I did not request the hearing I responded
[01:36:28.960 --> 01:36:37.360]  selling mail. Yeah but that's not that okay a response to the agency is not binding upon the
[01:36:37.360 --> 01:36:47.120]  agency period okay when they offer you the opportunity to have a hearing you have to take it
[01:36:47.120 --> 01:36:51.600]  because if you don't they get to act in contrary to anything that might have occurred at that
[01:36:51.600 --> 01:36:59.120]  hearing because you did not seek that remedy okay. So the problem is that you now have
[01:36:59.120 --> 01:37:05.520]  an administrative issue for which you did not request a hearing that you were entitled to
[01:37:05.520 --> 01:37:11.360]  thus allowing the state to default you as far as Tennessee is concerned. So the thing
[01:37:11.360 --> 01:37:15.680]  you're complaining about in Kentucky is exactly what you allowed the state of Tennessee to do to
[01:37:15.680 --> 01:37:28.880]  you. Okay so what I'm okay but how is what I don't understand is how is that possible when.
[01:37:28.880 --> 01:37:35.840]  Because it's administrative it doesn't have to be completed in the other state it's administrative
[01:37:35.840 --> 01:37:43.360]  they more or less do the same thing here in Texas. Some local podunk municipal or JP court
[01:37:43.360 --> 01:37:49.200]  sends an unlawful illegal notice to the department of public safety to suspend a license
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  citing one of two things failure to appear which they do illegally even when the person appears
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:03.680]  because the person would not enter a plea without proper notice. Okay the other way is that the
[01:38:03.680 --> 01:38:10.880]  statute says that they're required by law to submit that notice of the citation and the charges
[01:38:10.880 --> 01:38:14.000]  especially if it's one of the charges for which they can suspend the license
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:22.160]  such as no financial responsibility proof they are then by statute supposed to notify you of
[01:38:22.160 --> 01:38:28.160]  your opportunity for a hearing. Now here's the problem it's exactly what I was saying at the
[01:38:28.160 --> 01:38:33.440]  beginning of the show in my diatribe there is that here you're being told you have a right to
[01:38:33.440 --> 01:38:37.440]  an administrative hearing over the issue of suspending your license but you're being denied
[01:38:37.440 --> 01:38:40.560]  the administrative hearing over the issue for which you're appearing in the other court
[01:38:40.560 --> 01:38:42.400]  that is getting your license suspended.
[01:38:46.480 --> 01:38:51.200]  It's a completely bogus setup the way they're doing it it's criminal in one instance and
[01:38:51.200 --> 01:39:01.200]  completely civil in another which is entirely wrong. Right because what I said even if they
[01:39:01.200 --> 01:39:07.680]  because when we read the paper it was almost as if they were saying doesn't matter if they
[01:39:07.680 --> 01:39:13.200]  give me administrative hearing they're still going to charge me if they find fit
[01:39:14.720 --> 01:39:20.400]  on a situation that's pending out of Kentucky. Well that's why these agencies have to be sued
[01:39:20.400 --> 01:39:25.760]  over these administrative statutes. The statute is unconstitutional in that it requires them to
[01:39:25.760 --> 01:39:33.120]  take an action that is unlawful it violates a right of due process. An administrative hearing
[01:39:33.120 --> 01:39:38.080]  by an administrative judge that is acting as a rubber stamp for the administrative agency
[01:39:38.080 --> 01:39:42.080]  is not a due process representation at all.
[01:39:45.520 --> 01:39:50.880]  The administrative judge is going to rule for the agency 99.9 times out of 100
[01:39:52.880 --> 01:39:55.200]  and they always round up if you catch my drift.
[01:39:55.200 --> 01:40:06.160]  Yeah okay so what is my what's my I have a memo where the DOJ sent out saying that they could not
[01:40:06.720 --> 01:40:13.200]  just solely suspend. Sue them in federal court for the rights violations it's the only chance
[01:40:13.200 --> 01:40:20.240]  you've got left. Okay so I have to. You might even make the allegation of criminal conspiracy
[01:40:20.240 --> 01:40:25.600]  across state lines between the state of Kentucky agency and the Tennessee agency to deprive you
[01:40:25.600 --> 01:40:33.360]  of that right. I think I can make that because I put them on notice. Absolutely you can make it
[01:40:33.360 --> 01:40:38.480]  and here's why these states have what's called a reciprocity agreement in the form of the driver's
[01:40:38.480 --> 01:40:43.280]  license compact. Look in the state statutes I guarantee you both Kentucky and Tennessee
[01:40:43.280 --> 01:40:50.880]  have a driver's license compact section in their statutes. In that agreement which they must prove
[01:40:50.880 --> 01:40:56.880]  the United States congress authorized in which case the whole thing is federal anyway
[01:40:58.880 --> 01:41:06.240]  under title 49 which is what I've tried to tell people all along because the the federal
[01:41:06.240 --> 01:41:12.160]  constitution has a specific clause that forbids any state from entering into any agreement or
[01:41:12.160 --> 01:41:18.080]  compact with any other state of the union without express consent by the United States congress.
[01:41:19.440 --> 01:41:24.640]  Okay the only clause within the federal constitution that would allow congress
[01:41:24.640 --> 01:41:29.840]  to reach within the state to approve such a compact or agreement is the commerce clause.
[01:41:31.280 --> 01:41:36.800]  It's the only one. Okay in relation to transportation in these motor vehicles
[01:41:36.800 --> 01:41:43.280]  it's the only one. So under the commerce clause which again ties all this right back to commerce
[01:41:44.480 --> 01:41:50.160]  the federal laws would then be binding if that state has a license compact because the only way
[01:41:50.160 --> 01:41:55.280]  they could have gotten it is with federal approval which makes the federal laws binding over the
[01:41:55.280 --> 01:42:04.080]  state laws. Get it? Right. Which now makes it a federal case issue that you can take up in
[01:42:04.080 --> 01:42:14.400]  federal court as long as you plead it correctly. Gotcha. So so would that be a a uh. Title 42
[01:42:14.400 --> 01:42:21.920]  lawsuit. Okay. Violation of rights under color of law state law that's in violation of controlling
[01:42:21.920 --> 01:42:33.920]  federal law of the same subject. That's okay. So I will sue Tennessee. Well if you can make
[01:42:33.920 --> 01:42:39.440]  the conspiracy argument by showing that either the states did not have congressional approval
[01:42:39.440 --> 01:42:46.240]  to enter into that compact or by showing that the states mutually agreed to act illegally
[01:42:46.240 --> 01:42:53.600]  under the compact then you can make a conspiracy argument as well. Okay. Conspiracy or criminal
[01:42:53.600 --> 01:42:59.920]  collusion. Now whether or not you have a federal cause of action out of that for a civil side
[01:42:59.920 --> 01:43:11.920]  that's another issue but it's definitely a title 18 crime. Gotcha. So I got to do some digging into
[01:43:11.920 --> 01:43:19.280]  that uh compact clause. Absolutely. You would have to find where the United States congress
[01:43:19.280 --> 01:43:21.840]  authorized those states to engage in that compact.
[01:43:21.840 --> 01:43:27.840]  Okay.
[01:43:31.040 --> 01:43:34.560]  All right well that's what I needed to know. I was just trying to see what would be my next move
[01:43:35.360 --> 01:43:39.680]  uh since they they they pulled that the war a little miles on that one.
[01:43:41.200 --> 01:43:45.120]  Well no they didn't you just didn't understand what you were reading and you needed to.
[01:43:45.120 --> 01:43:50.720]  Okay. Okay because they gave you the opportunity you just didn't know you had to take it.
[01:43:50.720 --> 01:44:17.360]  No I did. All right man I appreciate your call. We'll be right back folks so y'all hang on.
[01:44:20.720 --> 01:44:27.120]  Many still don't know what hemp is so now you know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.120 --> 01:44:32.800]  They are different varieties of the same species. Hempusa.org wants the world to know these basic
[01:44:32.800 --> 01:44:37.520]  facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret
[01:44:37.520 --> 01:44:44.000]  you need to know about. Remember hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free,
[01:44:44.000 --> 01:44:53.760]  anti-inflammatory, non-gmo, and is loaded with nutrients. Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367 and
[01:44:53.760 --> 01:45:02.640]  see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempusa.org. Are you the plaintiff or
[01:45:02.640 --> 01:45:08.880]  defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary. The affordable
[01:45:08.880 --> 01:45:17.360]  easy to understand 4CD course that will show you how in 24 hours step by step. If you have a lawyer
[01:45:17.360 --> 01:45:22.800]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.520 --> 01:45:29.920]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too. Juris Dictionary was created
[01:45:29.920 --> 01:45:36.880]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit
[01:45:36.880 --> 01:45:42.160]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[01:45:42.160 --> 01:45:48.880]  our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for
[01:45:48.880 --> 01:45:56.880]  civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.880 --> 01:46:09.200]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY.
[01:46:26.880 --> 01:46:53.200]  Alright folks we are back this is Rule of Law Radio we are now in the last segment of the show
[01:46:53.200 --> 01:47:01.520]  we have Mauricio in Texas. Mauricio what can we do for you? Hey Eddie how's it going? Long time no see
[01:47:01.520 --> 01:47:08.000]  your thoughts. Yes sir it's going good as far as I can tell but then again I'm half blind and wishing
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  I was still in bed so I don't know if I can tell or not. It sounds like I'm talking to the mirror
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:25.280]  there. Oh man no two questions and I'll leave you alone brother. The last time I saw you we were at
[01:47:25.280 --> 01:47:31.440]  your class at Half Price Books and I've been out of state for a while and I'm curious if you're
[01:47:31.440 --> 01:47:38.720]  doing any classes again? No when I start classes up they're going to be online not live so more
[01:47:38.720 --> 01:47:45.440]  people can attend more easily. There's no longer a venue of Brave New Books to do a class at
[01:47:45.440 --> 01:47:51.200]  and I certainly can't afford to rent a place. I understand I understand yeah alrighty well I
[01:47:51.200 --> 01:47:58.560]  look forward to when you go online then and two kind of a humorous thing some friends and I were
[01:47:58.560 --> 01:48:06.960]  arguing a hypothesis and it's that thanks to modern medicine and safety devices Darwinian
[01:48:06.960 --> 01:48:14.960]  theory is no longer relevant what's your take on that? About Darwinian theory? The survival of the
[01:48:14.960 --> 01:48:20.080]  fittest and thanks to modern medicine. I don't know that Darwin's theory is survival of the
[01:48:20.080 --> 01:48:28.000]  fittest. Darwin's theory is evolution. Survival of the fittest is more like almost any other theory
[01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:34.400]  of nature but not Darwin. Well forgive us forgive us that we sound even dumber than usual.
[01:48:35.920 --> 01:48:39.840]  Alrighty then brother we'll leave you alone. Okay thanks for calling. Take care.
[01:48:39.840 --> 01:48:48.480]  Alright now last but not least we appear to have Truth Raider in Oregon. Raider what can we do for
[01:48:48.480 --> 01:48:54.960]  you? Oh it's got some questions for you. Howdy howdy busy man. Howdy. How's your shoulder doing?
[01:48:54.960 --> 01:48:59.040]  How's your shoulder doing this week? Well it hadn't fallen off yet but there are days I
[01:48:59.040 --> 01:49:10.880]  wished it would. Oh I feel you had the same thing last year into my shoulder and I had nobody to bark
[01:49:10.880 --> 01:49:12.880]  at because I didn't have Obamacare so I just had to let it heal on its own. So now I got a couple
[01:49:12.880 --> 01:49:21.760]  questions for you. Did you receive the documents the notice of judgment? I don't know. When and
[01:49:21.760 --> 01:49:29.120]  how did you send them? I sent them to Eddie at Rule Law Radio. So you emailed them is the simple
[01:49:29.120 --> 01:49:37.760]  answer? Yeah. Okay I have not been in email much at all here for the last couple weeks I have been
[01:49:37.760 --> 01:49:42.560]  concentrating so hard on trying to get the new seminar stuff done and the cases that I am
[01:49:42.560 --> 01:49:47.760]  currently working on that I have not even bothered to look at email for anything other than the stuff
[01:49:47.760 --> 01:49:54.640]  relating to those issues. Okay fair enough. Now what you were talking about that administrative
[01:49:54.640 --> 01:50:02.000]  option that's exactly what they denied me and I hammered them on that. You're not going to do
[01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:07.840]  proper due process and giving me that option. So motion to dismiss. In not giving you that option
[01:50:07.840 --> 01:50:15.280]  or in giving you that option? Not giving me that option. Okay. It's a due process. So the
[01:50:15.280 --> 01:50:19.040]  judge thought that you have to read it yourself you have to read the when you when you looked
[01:50:19.040 --> 01:50:23.280]  up documents on email you have to read yourself but that's how I won which is a bigger victory
[01:50:23.280 --> 01:50:27.920]  than what I had two years ago. The victory I had two years ago was a matter of dumb luck.
[01:50:28.720 --> 01:50:34.560]  The officer didn't want to go to battle he got cold feet an option just to dismiss a citation.
[01:50:34.560 --> 01:50:37.840]  Well it was only dumb luck if you planned on going in there not listening to me.
[01:50:40.720 --> 01:50:45.040]  I do listen. Otherwise even if the officer had shown up you would have beaten the tar
[01:50:45.040 --> 01:50:50.080]  out of him with what you had to ask him on the stand I would hope by now at least.
[01:50:51.040 --> 01:50:56.240]  Yeah yeah by now yeah right but all that has to be done in the mail person writing 30 days prior
[01:50:56.240 --> 01:51:00.800]  to that so-called trial these seven interrogatories because they're civil infractions here in the state
[01:51:00.800 --> 01:51:06.320]  of Oregon. Yeah. Okay now what do you think you were discussing earlier about the patronets
[01:51:07.360 --> 01:51:12.000]  what do you think about this guy it seems about he's very entertaining but you may categorize him
[01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:18.880]  in that in one of the bigger patronets Ernie Wayne Sertelka the natural living man of Montana
[01:51:18.880 --> 01:51:23.760]  have you ever heard of him? If we're I don't know if I have or not if we're talking about the guy
[01:51:23.760 --> 01:51:29.920]  in the brown coat and brown hat and glasses and beard that got sent to jail for fishing
[01:51:31.040 --> 01:51:36.720]  and he claimed foraging I know who you're talking about but I don't know what he talks about or what
[01:51:36.720 --> 01:51:42.480]  his theory is or how he goes about it. Oh good god well he would probably fall in the line of the
[01:51:42.480 --> 01:51:47.520]  the patronet stuff because he put a whole book together he's working on it now for his natural
[01:51:47.520 --> 01:51:53.200]  identity the whole nine yards everything you know his his background his history his family tree
[01:51:53.200 --> 01:51:56.800]  where he has nothing to do with any of the corporate fictions or anything like that.
[01:51:56.800 --> 01:52:00.560]  Well this all goes back to what I keep trying to get people to understand is
[01:52:00.560 --> 01:52:04.880]  a they don't care about any of that because that is not what they're presuming it is not what
[01:52:04.880 --> 01:52:09.200]  they're basing their authority on and it's not how they're taking action it's completely irrelevant
[01:52:09.200 --> 01:52:14.640]  to what they're doing this is this is the thing I love the most or despise the most depending upon
[01:52:14.640 --> 01:52:21.600]  how you look at it about the patronets let's make the most irrelevant argument possible to the issue
[01:52:21.600 --> 01:52:29.040]  that actually exists that seems to be the goal of every patronet argument on the planet make an
[01:52:29.040 --> 01:52:36.240]  argument that has absolutely nothing to do with the facts of the allegations being made and stand
[01:52:36.240 --> 01:52:44.400]  on those no matter what it's like going to the dry cleaner and ordering a steak and then demanding
[01:52:44.400 --> 01:52:53.680]  that they serve it. Yeah be true uh yeah so he does the thing with the the driver's license
[01:52:53.680 --> 01:52:58.080]  doesn't doesn't apply and all that stuff too so he's similar but he uses an entirely different
[01:52:58.080 --> 01:53:02.960]  argument and it falls in line with with all the you know the theoretical stuff but he's very
[01:53:02.960 --> 01:53:08.560]  interesting anyway he has a few victories but you know I don't know anyway that's that's all I got
[01:53:08.560 --> 01:53:12.960]  you got room for one more so I'll let you take that one more okay thanks for calling in
[01:53:13.680 --> 01:53:21.600]  all right brother all right good god bless and get well thanks all right now we got oh I don't
[01:53:21.600 --> 01:53:25.440]  know five and a half minutes left in this show and nobody else on the board so that's okay
[01:53:25.440 --> 01:53:30.000]  that being said let's understand one thing about everything I started this show off with
[01:53:30.720 --> 01:53:36.800]  the only people that's going to make any difference to any of this is us we're the only ones that can
[01:53:36.800 --> 01:53:44.240]  refuse to allow this system to continue to survive and operate as it does you and me
[01:53:45.840 --> 01:53:53.360]  not just as individuals but collectively as individuals uh and groups we can come together
[01:53:53.360 --> 01:54:01.200]  and show our strength by refusing to allow the system to have any traction we can do this with
[01:54:01.200 --> 01:54:06.800]  jury nullification we can especially with jury nullification it's the easiest way in the world
[01:54:06.800 --> 01:54:13.520]  to get it done refuse to convict on any of these laws that these people have put in place
[01:54:14.320 --> 01:54:20.960]  nullify the law by nullifying any ability to get a conviction with it it's that simple okay
[01:54:20.960 --> 01:54:27.920]  okay no matter what the judge tells you the law is you have the right to know more and know it
[01:54:27.920 --> 01:54:33.120]  better than that judge is willing to tell you and you have the right to vote your conscience
[01:54:33.120 --> 01:54:40.080]  as a jury member no matter what the judge tells you no matter what the law says you have the right
[01:54:40.080 --> 01:54:47.760]  to say take this law and shove it to you know take a little creative license with a song
[01:54:47.760 --> 01:54:57.360]  but the fact is that's what we need to be doing if we do not stand up now it will be too late
[01:54:59.200 --> 01:55:03.520]  because the public education system is ensuring that your children won't know this
[01:55:04.560 --> 01:55:11.200]  the lack of time that you spend trying to unindoctrinate them from what they're being
[01:55:11.200 --> 01:55:16.400]  indoctrinated with on a daily basis from friends and school and everything else
[01:55:16.400 --> 01:55:20.880]  you're not going to win that fight you're swimming against the tide because you won't dedicate the
[01:55:20.880 --> 01:55:27.360]  time to doing hell most of you don't even have enough information to know how to do it for
[01:55:27.360 --> 01:55:33.200]  yourself so how you going to teach it to your kids if you don't start taking an interest in
[01:55:33.200 --> 01:55:36.800]  this and understanding how it works and why it's being done the way it's being done
[01:55:37.520 --> 01:55:41.760]  don't act surprised when it just washes right over you like a high tide on a beach
[01:55:41.760 --> 01:55:47.360]  because that's what's going to happen it's going to be the blob movie all over again except this
[01:55:47.360 --> 01:55:50.880]  time it'll be the sticky law that should have never been
[01:55:53.760 --> 01:55:58.880]  and it wasn't dropped on us from outer space it was dropped on us from the state capital
[01:56:03.920 --> 01:56:08.240]  and it's going to consume you no is no ands no buts
[01:56:08.240 --> 01:56:15.200]  if something doesn't change everything will change for the worse not for the better
[01:56:16.320 --> 01:56:21.840]  and only the few will have the power that rightfully belongs to us all as well as the rights
[01:56:23.520 --> 01:56:28.880]  that belong to us all only a few will have them and only a few will be able to exercise them and
[01:56:28.880 --> 01:56:32.800]  only the few will enjoy what all of us are entitled to
[01:56:32.800 --> 01:56:40.640]  and i for one don't appreciate that at all and i have no compunction about letting somebody know
[01:56:40.640 --> 01:56:50.320]  it and fighting against it to protect what is mine this mic is not the only weapon in my arsenal
[01:56:51.280 --> 01:56:58.000]  but it is most certainly the most powerful one if it can incite you to do it for yourself
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:04.720]  most certainly the most powerful one if it can incite you to seek an understanding and
[01:57:04.720 --> 01:57:10.720]  a desire for change that you otherwise did not have until now
[01:57:14.320 --> 01:57:22.160]  i am not a great order i am not eloquent i am not i have that texas drawl and slang and everything
[01:57:22.160 --> 01:57:25.840]  i say and do which makes me sound like the country hick that i truly am at heart
[01:57:25.840 --> 01:57:33.600]  but i'm not stupid and if you equate my speech with ignorance then you're making a serious
[01:57:33.600 --> 01:57:40.000]  mistake and that's what we need to make them all aware of you've assumed too much from the way i
[01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:48.560]  talk and the way i walk but not the way i think we better learn to think different better learn
[01:57:48.560 --> 01:57:58.480]  to think right and we better learn to act together or all is lost and that ship is going down
[01:57:59.680 --> 01:58:05.520]  don't let that happen i like freedom and liberty you should like freedom and liberty enough to
[01:58:05.520 --> 01:58:10.480]  fight for it all right folks this has been the monday night rule of law radio show with your
[01:58:10.480 --> 01:58:15.600]  host eddie craig i appreciate all the callers and all the listeners out there in radio land
[01:58:15.600 --> 01:58:20.160]  please keep us in your financial prayers and in your financial donation schedule whenever and
[01:58:20.160 --> 01:58:25.520]  however much you can we are in desperate need of funds right now the fundraiser is ongoing
[01:58:25.520 --> 01:58:32.720]  don't forget that every 25 get your name and drawing for the gun so folks please please keep
[01:58:32.720 --> 01:58:46.640]  please please keep us on the air keep us going y'all have a great week good night and god bless
[01:58:50.160 --> 01:58:56.640]  bibles for america is offering absolutely free a unique study bible called the new testament
[01:58:56.640 --> 01:59:02.080]  recovery version the new testament recovery version has over 9 000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.080 --> 01:59:08.400]  what the bible says verse by verse helping you to know god and to know the meaning of life order
[01:59:08.400 --> 01:59:17.840]  your free copy today from bibles for america call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online
[01:59:17.840 --> 01:59:25.920]  at bfa.org this translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13 000 cross references
[01:59:25.920 --> 01:59:31.680]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the bible this is truly a bible you can
[01:59:31.680 --> 01:59:36.960]  understand to get your free copy of the new testament recovery version call us toll free
[01:59:36.960 --> 01:59:48.960]  at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:59:48.960 --> 01:59:59.920]  looking for some truth you found it logosradionetwork.com