ROL_2018-06-11_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:29.520]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22 an ounce.
[00:29.520 --> 00:41.200]  It's over $16.68 now, Texas Crude $65.51 a barrel, Bitcoin $690.19, Ethereum $420.80,
[00:41.200 --> 00:55.520]  Bitcoin Cash $652.90, and finally Litecoins $114.34, a crypto coin.
[00:55.520 --> 01:01.240]  Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01.240 --> 01:06.200]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color,
[01:06.200 --> 01:08.080]  religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:08.080 --> 01:13.200]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.200 --> 01:18.360]  in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:18.360 --> 01:28.680]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack on civilians
[01:28.680 --> 01:32.960]  in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which is being blamed
[01:32.960 --> 01:37.560]  on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the United States
[01:37.560 --> 01:42.040]  and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as
[01:42.040 --> 01:43.360]  of yet.
[01:43.360 --> 01:47.200]  President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and
[01:47.200 --> 01:51.560]  all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new
[01:51.560 --> 01:56.360]  and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal
[01:56.360 --> 01:58.600]  who kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:58.600 --> 02:02.640]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[02:02.640 --> 02:06.800]  attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:06.800 --> 02:11.040]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the Organization
[02:11.040 --> 02:15.600]  for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[02:15.600 --> 02:19.400]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil
[02:19.400 --> 02:24.000]  war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[02:24.000 --> 02:28.760]  rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[02:28.760 --> 02:32.520]  notorious winner groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.520 --> 02:37.840]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook
[02:37.840 --> 02:42.200]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[02:42.200 --> 02:46.760]  has been fighting terrorists, or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart
[02:46.760 --> 02:52.200]  missile strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at.
[02:52.200 --> 03:21.200]  This was Perk Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[03:21.200 --> 03:47.200]  Thanks for watching this video, and I'll see you in the next one.
[03:47.200 --> 04:13.200]  Thanks for watching this video, and I'll see you in the next one.
[04:17.200 --> 04:29.680]  Good evening folks, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie
[04:29.680 --> 04:30.680]  Craig.
[04:30.680 --> 04:33.000]  It is June 11, 2018.
[04:33.000 --> 04:34.240]  We are live tonight.
[04:34.240 --> 04:38.080]  This is not a replay, I promise.
[04:38.080 --> 04:45.920]  Now yesterday I spent a good deal of time doing legal research on the things that I refer
[04:45.920 --> 04:52.800]  to when discussing law with other people as the patronut arguments, of which there are
[04:52.800 --> 04:56.080]  many, and I do mean many.
[04:56.080 --> 05:03.440]  They are as varied and widespread as a species of insect, just a whole lot more detrimental
[05:03.440 --> 05:05.640]  in a lot of cases.
[05:05.640 --> 05:10.960]  Now after all the time I spent yesterday digging out case after case after case after case
[05:10.960 --> 05:19.280]  after case that has shot down these arguments, and reasonably so, because after years of
[05:19.280 --> 05:24.320]  studying that information for myself trying to learn all this, I came to the same conclusion
[05:24.320 --> 05:25.480]  the courts did.
[05:25.480 --> 05:32.240]  There is no basis in law for 99.9% of the crap these people are spouting.
[05:32.240 --> 05:37.960]  It almost always boils down to one of a few things.
[05:37.960 --> 05:45.000]  They have taken a case quote and citation completely out of context with the case it
[05:45.000 --> 05:49.600]  pertains to and the subject matter it pertains to and tried to use it across the board as
[05:49.600 --> 05:51.160]  an argument.
[05:51.160 --> 05:57.080]  Two, they have completely fabricated the case site.
[05:57.080 --> 06:01.160]  It doesn't exist in the case, it has never existed in the case, it's not even close to
[06:01.160 --> 06:06.040]  appearing in the case, it's not even relevant to what the case was about.
[06:06.040 --> 06:16.560]  Three, it is based upon complete misinterpretation and misconstruction of language, definitions,
[06:16.560 --> 06:20.640]  and numerous other things that are written into the law, but these people have twisted
[06:20.640 --> 06:25.680]  into a knot so tight it may as well be a Gordian knot.
[06:25.680 --> 06:31.160]  Four, these people are just plain freaking insane.
[06:31.160 --> 06:35.760]  Five, these people are just plain stupid.
[06:35.760 --> 06:44.680]  Or six, pick and choose any combination of the above because it does not appear to matter
[06:44.680 --> 06:50.200]  how much factual evidence you put in front of these people as to why the courts are going
[06:50.200 --> 06:56.880]  to reign on your parade when you go in there making these idiotic arguments, they're still
[06:56.880 --> 07:00.640]  arguing that their argument is right.
[07:00.640 --> 07:11.000]  But in fact, the research shows very clearly it is not right, it has never been right.
[07:11.000 --> 07:17.040]  But you may as well be trying to teach a brick to sing opera because you're going to get
[07:17.040 --> 07:24.840]  just as far as trying to use reason, logic, and facts and evidence on a patronite.
[07:24.840 --> 07:29.320]  It's not going to sway them in the least.
[07:29.320 --> 07:38.800]  It appears the only thing that will have any effect upon them is a period of striped sunshine.
[07:38.800 --> 07:44.040]  And then of course it's always the system's fault that they had to endure it.
[07:44.040 --> 07:48.400]  It's never their own.
[07:48.400 --> 07:55.080]  Now we have several groups of these patronites running loose here in Austin and they will
[07:55.080 --> 07:59.560]  tell you all kinds of things.
[07:59.560 --> 08:04.360]  There's one here in fact that for some reason everybody listens to.
[08:04.360 --> 08:11.200]  I do not know why because most of the stuff I have listened to her say, you can verify
[08:11.200 --> 08:16.160]  for yourself as being incorrect, not all of it, but enough of it to know that her basis
[08:16.160 --> 08:20.280]  and premise for her arguments is not well founded.
[08:20.280 --> 08:25.840]  It has nothing substantive supporting it.
[08:25.840 --> 08:30.400]  And yet people are still listening to this individual and I cannot figure out why other
[08:30.400 --> 08:33.760]  than the reasons I just gave you out of the six.
[08:33.760 --> 08:39.440]  But it's almost assuredly it's got to fall in the last three.
[08:39.440 --> 08:47.800]  Now I don't know how to solve this problem because I got another email, somebody asked
[08:47.800 --> 08:53.560]  me, let's see, what exactly was the specific question they asked me here?
[08:53.560 --> 09:02.160]  Let's see if I can find where the actual thing was.
[09:02.160 --> 09:13.640]  It just floors me that people don't, they just don't take the time to do real reading.
[09:13.640 --> 09:19.840]  They don't try to actually understand what they're talking about.
[09:19.840 --> 09:23.000]  They just don't even try.
[09:23.000 --> 09:28.960]  And I fear for the fate of the world.
[09:28.960 --> 09:36.360]  I really do because there is just nothing like it anywhere.
[09:36.360 --> 09:41.000]  Now this is the question I got in my email.
[09:41.000 --> 09:47.720]  From your experience, is there a way to protect myself as a natural born child of God as opposed
[09:47.720 --> 09:54.520]  and it was supposed to be opposed to the legal fiction trust that the courts deal with?
[09:54.520 --> 10:03.760]  Okay, now right there we have two patronage arguments right up front.
[10:03.760 --> 10:10.840]  One that the courts could care less about God to begin with because they don't.
[10:10.840 --> 10:13.960]  And two, the trust.
[10:13.960 --> 10:17.280]  There is no trust.
[10:17.280 --> 10:21.760]  In more ways than one, there is no trust.
[10:21.760 --> 10:26.160]  So this is how I respond.
[10:26.160 --> 10:32.760]  There are a lot of presumptions in your question so it is not easily answered but I'll try.
[10:32.760 --> 10:36.360]  The courts neither know nor care anything at all for God.
[10:36.360 --> 10:41.920]  They barely care about the actual law itself when the mood suits them to do otherwise.
[10:41.920 --> 10:47.040]  The only protection you are ever going to have in this day and age is to fight back.
[10:47.040 --> 10:52.040]  The only way you're going to fight back and not be murdered where you stand is by beating
[10:52.040 --> 10:55.960]  them to death with the tools of their own system and its rules.
[10:55.960 --> 11:01.040]  In other words, you have to be a better lawyer than the actual attorneys are, which really
[11:01.040 --> 11:05.560]  isn't as hard as one might think considering that the majority of them have never even
[11:05.560 --> 11:11.920]  so much as read or fully understood the actual laws they fight over and with every single
[11:11.920 --> 11:12.920]  day.
[11:12.920 --> 11:16.400]  Today, it's all about playing Let's Make a Deal.
[11:16.400 --> 11:21.600]  Only in this version, Monty Hall isn't going to be standing there smiling and offering
[11:21.600 --> 11:24.360]  you a chance to win easy money.
[11:24.360 --> 11:28.440]  If you are asking for a silver bullet, well, news flash.
[11:28.440 --> 11:34.480]  That only exists in werewolf horror movies and this isn't that kind of horror movie.
[11:34.480 --> 11:39.400]  Get rich and the will and ability to use it properly is the only protection you will ever
[11:39.400 --> 11:45.120]  have for what those in government are and will continue doing, at least until the American
[11:45.120 --> 11:50.480]  public wakes up en masse and decides that they have had enough.
[11:50.480 --> 11:54.960]  Anything else is a legal get rich quick scheme that will cost you far more than it will ever
[11:54.960 --> 11:57.280]  benefit you.
[11:57.280 --> 12:04.920]  Now, ever since I have been doing this and having these discussions with people, I have
[12:04.920 --> 12:14.240]  tried my very level best to provide a citation that everyone can use and easily find if they
[12:14.240 --> 12:20.560]  want to look to support anything that I tell you on this show.
[12:20.560 --> 12:25.520]  I tell you what statutes to look at, what codes to look in, where to find those statutes,
[12:25.520 --> 12:30.640]  where to find those codes, where to find the original enactments, where to find the case
[12:30.640 --> 12:33.040]  law, you name it.
[12:33.040 --> 12:38.160]  I tell you time and time again all the information so you can go and reference it for yourself,
[12:38.160 --> 12:44.880]  hence my motto of don't believe me, check it out for yourself.
[12:44.880 --> 12:52.920]  This is a methodology for which the patronates fail grandly.
[12:52.920 --> 12:56.720]  They never verify any of the information they are given.
[12:56.720 --> 13:02.280]  They simply cast it aside if it does not concur with what they think they already know, which
[13:02.280 --> 13:08.560]  they also never bothered to verify from any legitimate source.
[13:08.560 --> 13:15.920]  They have it spoon fed to them by idiots that made this crap up to make themselves feel good
[13:15.920 --> 13:22.200]  about why they couldn't get ahead in the world on what they're trying to do and swallowed
[13:22.200 --> 13:27.520]  hook line and sinker like a fish in the lake and then they're surprised when they're reeled
[13:27.520 --> 13:35.000]  into a courtroom and full aid on the defense table.
[13:35.000 --> 13:41.680]  It just astounds me that this has to happen over and over again, not only to different
[13:41.680 --> 13:47.480]  people but to the same people and it's always the system's fault.
[13:47.480 --> 13:51.120]  It's never the individual's fault because they're doing everything right.
[13:51.120 --> 13:57.200]  They know they're right even though they cannot point you to a single verifiable, reputable
[13:57.200 --> 14:03.680]  reference that supports the idiocy they're promoting and using.
[14:03.680 --> 14:07.160]  Why?
[14:07.160 --> 14:14.400]  Has our education system gotten so bad that even when the opportunity is presented to
[14:14.400 --> 14:20.200]  you to verify information for yourself, you are so incompetently inept that you cannot
[14:20.200 --> 14:25.600]  even bother to pick up a book or go on the internet and go to the right location and
[14:25.600 --> 14:31.800]  look at it to see for yourself.
[14:31.800 --> 14:42.920]  It is ridiculous that we have become that apathetic at knowing what we need to know.
[14:42.920 --> 14:49.800]  There are days when I look back and I wonder, you know, why am I still on this show?
[14:49.800 --> 14:53.520]  And then I get phone calls from listeners talking about what they've accomplished and
[14:53.520 --> 14:57.760]  what they've learned and I remember.
[14:57.760 --> 15:02.520]  But in between those days of doing the show and everything else, it's like you're swimming
[15:02.520 --> 15:10.240]  uphill on a waterfall and you are not a salmon.
[15:10.240 --> 15:16.760]  It can be disheartening because you try to help people and they turn around and bite
[15:16.760 --> 15:21.960]  you for it.
[15:21.960 --> 15:31.920]  So that being said, when people contact me in emails like this one and pretty much everything
[15:31.920 --> 15:39.880]  they're asking me revolves around trying to implement a patronut methodology to become
[15:39.880 --> 15:43.160]  protected and free.
[15:43.160 --> 15:49.000]  I don't even most of the time try to waste my time replying back to it because I have
[15:49.000 --> 15:54.280]  to spend more time convincing you that what you think you already know is not right than
[15:54.280 --> 15:57.760]  trying to teach you what is.
[15:57.760 --> 16:09.600]  Like Confucius says, you cannot pour fresh tea into an already full cup.
[16:09.600 --> 16:17.080]  So when you contact me and ask me things like that, thinking that you already have a grip
[16:17.080 --> 16:22.680]  on the situation when in fact your words are telling me that the grip you have is completely
[16:22.680 --> 16:30.320]  incorrect, don't hold your breath waiting for a reply because if you've dug in deep
[16:30.320 --> 16:36.880]  enough with the argument that you're trying to get me to agree with and instruct you on,
[16:36.880 --> 16:39.440]  I'm not going to waste my time.
[16:39.440 --> 16:43.120]  I mean, I'll cover this a little bit more after this break and then we'll start taking
[16:43.120 --> 16:46.680]  the callers so I'll go ahead and turn the caller board on while we're at break here
[16:46.680 --> 16:52.920]  and the calling number is 512-646-1984 but I'm going to finish this up on the other side
[16:52.920 --> 17:03.920]  so y'all hang on and we will be right back after this break.
[17:03.920 --> 17:09.920]  That's the 2018 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway sponsored by Central
[17:09.920 --> 17:10.920]  Texas GunWorks.
[17:10.920 --> 17:15.440]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:15.440 --> 17:18.920]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:18.920 --> 17:25.680]  From Central Texas GunWorks, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[17:25.680 --> 17:28.440]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:28.440 --> 17:34.520]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:34.520 --> 17:38.400]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:38.400 --> 17:42.360]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:42.360 --> 17:47.480]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can
[17:47.480 --> 17:52.020]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[17:52.020 --> 17:55.240]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:55.240 --> 18:00.640]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.640 --> 18:05.960]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.960 --> 18:09.360]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:09.360 --> 18:13.760]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.760 --> 18:14.760]  can win too.
[18:14.760 --> 18:19.600]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.600 --> 18:20.600]  civil rights statutes.
[18:20.600 --> 18:24.920]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[18:24.920 --> 18:26.920]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:26.920 --> 18:29.560]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[18:29.560 --> 18:34.200]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:34.200 --> 18:39.320]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.320 --> 18:41.480]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.480 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 18:57.640]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.640 --> 19:05.640]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next, use your lieutenant to the Logos Radio Network
[19:05.640 --> 19:20.640]  at yahoo.com.
[19:20.640 --> 19:44.120]  Yep, there it goes folks, you hear that?
[19:44.120 --> 19:45.840]  Slip it into the twilight zone.
[19:45.840 --> 19:49.920]  When I start talking to these people, that's exactly what it feels like.
[19:49.920 --> 19:54.520]  I'm watching an old episode of twilight zone and all I hear in my mind while they're talking
[19:54.520 --> 19:58.320]  is the theme music.
[19:58.320 --> 20:02.880]  And the reason for it is, is because I've already been down that road.
[20:02.880 --> 20:08.000]  I know it's a dead end with huge potholes.
[20:08.000 --> 20:16.440]  It will get you nowhere and if you drive far enough it runs you off of a really steep ravine.
[20:16.440 --> 20:23.080]  Why would I go there, but some people have to be hauled out of that chasm multiple times
[20:23.080 --> 20:26.840]  before they'll realize that they're going to run off that cliff every single time they
[20:26.840 --> 20:30.600]  go down that road.
[20:30.600 --> 20:35.400]  But it's the cliff's fault because they figured if they used the road this time the cliff
[20:35.400 --> 20:38.880]  wouldn't be there.
[20:38.880 --> 20:43.120]  That is the kind of thinking you're dealing with.
[20:43.120 --> 20:50.000]  And people, I mean today there was a ton of comments on that post and people are arguing
[20:50.000 --> 20:54.120]  and basically it comes down to, well there's got to be something to these arguments or
[20:54.120 --> 20:56.760]  so many people wouldn't be doing it.
[20:56.760 --> 21:04.040]  So I commented back, I said newsflash people, in an Indian hunt there were many of Plains
[21:04.040 --> 21:14.360]  Buffalo that Parrish just follow in the crowd right over a cliff.
[21:14.360 --> 21:20.920]  Lemmings do it and they're not even being driven.
[21:20.920 --> 21:31.640]  And now we have patronates doing it and they're driving themselves.
[21:31.640 --> 21:38.520]  It is beyond coherent thinking, I mean it's the same thing with talking to people spouting
[21:38.520 --> 21:47.040]  flat earth, I mean it just does not end on the amount of mental regression that is going
[21:47.040 --> 21:50.560]  on in this country.
[21:50.560 --> 21:55.480]  If you'd have told me that this day would ever arrive I would have looked at you and
[21:55.480 --> 22:00.560]  laughed so hard I would have spit up my dinner.
[22:00.560 --> 22:05.960]  And now I can't do a thing but shake my head and look for somewhere quiet to sit and stay
[22:05.960 --> 22:16.600]  out of the way because you're no longer safe in the crowd because the crowd is all insane.
[22:16.600 --> 22:18.680]  So what do we do about it?
[22:18.680 --> 22:23.240]  I don't know, therein lies the rub.
[22:23.240 --> 22:24.240]  What do we do about this?
[22:24.240 --> 22:28.680]  Now let me give you one other example and this is not in any way meant to disparage the
[22:28.680 --> 22:33.240]  individual who sent me this e-mail but I'm going to give you another example of the kind
[22:33.240 --> 22:39.600]  of stuff that's being put out there that has yet to ever work but everybody's doing it
[22:39.600 --> 22:44.320]  or at least everybody of a particular nationality and descent are doing it and that again is
[22:44.320 --> 22:48.520]  not meant to disparage the individual in any way, that's just a simple fact of the matter
[22:48.520 --> 22:50.440]  that we're talking about here.
[22:50.440 --> 22:56.320]  Now this is an e-mail and first off the e-mail is very difficult to read because once I start
[22:56.320 --> 23:03.400]  reading you some of the communication here you're going to see what I'm talking about.
[23:03.400 --> 23:10.600]  I status my status in the land being Morris American National.
[23:10.600 --> 23:16.040]  I was threatened to give my info as well and I buckled because I was on my lunch break
[23:16.040 --> 23:20.120]  but besides that they threatened to break my window if I didn't step out and that's
[23:20.120 --> 23:22.920]  why I stepped out of my automobile.
[23:22.920 --> 23:31.760]  So still does not tell me anything about the question I actually asked to get this reply.
[23:31.760 --> 23:39.360]  So there's the other problem, the failure to communicate.
[23:39.360 --> 23:50.960]  You write plain simple words that people for some reason cannot seem to even understand.
[23:50.960 --> 23:57.320]  I mean this is the e-mail that preceded this response and just so I get it right I'm going
[23:57.320 --> 24:01.160]  to read you what I wrote the first time in reply to this.
[24:01.160 --> 24:05.680]  Ridiculous charges being question.
[24:05.680 --> 24:12.000]  Stimming from what series of events and most importantly what was the original catalyst
[24:12.000 --> 24:16.400]  event that originated all of these others because in the previous e-mail he was talking
[24:16.400 --> 24:21.000]  about how he was getting racked up on certain charges and discharges and those charges and
[24:21.000 --> 24:25.320]  bigger charges but he didn't actually say what the charges were.
[24:25.320 --> 24:29.400]  So here I'm trying to ask him what charges specifically are you trying to tell me you're
[24:29.400 --> 24:33.440]  dealing with and this is the reply I get.
[24:33.440 --> 24:37.880]  Doesn't even begin to tell me what the charges are.
[24:37.880 --> 24:41.840]  He explains something to me I did not ask and that is not at all relevant to the facts
[24:41.840 --> 24:47.840]  I need to know to answer any questions he might have about what to do.
[24:47.840 --> 24:58.520]  And this is one of hundreds of these I get every day and it's exasperating because I
[24:58.520 --> 25:03.120]  want to help people but there are times when you look at what you're reading and you go
[25:03.120 --> 25:09.680]  there is nothing I will ever be able to do for you, nothing.
[25:09.680 --> 25:17.600]  You can't even answer a simple direct question about what your charges are to tell me anything
[25:17.600 --> 25:20.720]  that I could use to help you.
[25:20.720 --> 25:25.960]  So how much difficulty am I going to have explaining simple steps to you and simple arguments
[25:25.960 --> 25:33.400]  to you if I get involved with you in this matter?
[25:33.400 --> 25:35.160]  I have enough heartburn.
[25:35.160 --> 25:37.160]  Thank you very much.
[25:37.160 --> 25:43.720]  Why would I subject myself to more?
[25:43.720 --> 25:48.840]  And it comes down to people not thinking, people not even attempting to pay attention
[25:48.840 --> 25:52.280]  to the details of what they're doing.
[25:52.280 --> 25:59.040]  And people in this system that is going to get you hurt.
[25:59.040 --> 26:05.760]  Lack of attention to detail is fatal when you're dealing with a legal issue.
[26:05.760 --> 26:15.320]  Time frame and detail, facts, evidence, those things are all that matters.
[26:15.320 --> 26:24.080]  And once you fail to follow any one of them, you lose.
[26:24.080 --> 26:27.920]  Sometimes you will lose even when you do everything right because the system doesn't
[26:27.920 --> 26:29.360]  want you to win.
[26:29.360 --> 26:36.080]  That doesn't mean that you can't still win, but it does mean that your fight just got
[26:36.080 --> 26:37.080]  up.
[26:37.080 --> 26:38.280]  They have the ante on you.
[26:38.280 --> 26:43.800]  And so you've either got to call or fold.
[26:43.800 --> 26:45.160]  It's really that simple.
[26:45.160 --> 26:50.760]  They bank more on you giving up than on you fighting back.
[26:50.760 --> 26:56.280]  But when you can't learn what you need to learn or won't learn what you need to learn
[26:56.280 --> 27:01.880]  or refuse to learn what you need to learn or you try to mix and match what you need
[27:01.880 --> 27:09.040]  to learn, you are asking for trouble to take on a fight that you will never be prepared
[27:09.040 --> 27:12.680]  for.
[27:12.680 --> 27:19.000]  And I'm kind of like some of these professional or Olympic coaches.
[27:19.000 --> 27:23.640]  I'm not going to train somebody who is not going to listen to me and has no chance of
[27:23.640 --> 27:28.080]  winning what I'm training them to compete for.
[27:28.080 --> 27:31.800]  It would be a complete and utter waste of my time to take some slob out of the gutter
[27:31.800 --> 27:38.400]  and turn them into an Olympic athlete when they're 55 years old, 480 pounds, diabetic,
[27:38.400 --> 27:39.400]  and a drunkard.
[27:39.400 --> 27:45.600]  It just ain't going to happen.
[27:45.600 --> 27:50.360]  So in legal parlance, when you've got all this stuff under your belt that is completely
[27:50.360 --> 27:55.320]  detrimental to your life and well-being and you want me to teach you how to use it to
[27:55.320 --> 28:04.520]  do what it will never do, I'm not wasting my time on that ever.
[28:04.520 --> 28:12.920]  And there's no way to explain any of this, any nicer that I'm trying to do because people
[28:12.920 --> 28:15.800]  hate to be told that their information is wrong.
[28:15.800 --> 28:18.680]  It doesn't matter how nice you tell them.
[28:18.680 --> 28:24.720]  There is no nice way to look at somebody and go, well, I'm so happy for you two at the
[28:24.720 --> 28:26.240]  birth of your child.
[28:26.240 --> 28:34.080]  No matter how ugly that child may be, there just is no nice way to make that come out.
[28:34.080 --> 28:44.720]  Even if the truth is the kid is ugly as a mud fence, there's no nice way to say it.
[28:44.720 --> 28:51.680]  And the problem here when it comes to stuff in law is that you can't whitewash this stuff
[28:51.680 --> 28:54.160]  and make it work, at least not from our side.
[28:54.160 --> 28:57.760]  Now they can do it from their side rather easily because they can make it sound better
[28:57.760 --> 29:04.560]  than an experienced snob can, but you go in there trying to whitewash, you're going to
[29:04.560 --> 29:08.880]  get called on it.
[29:08.880 --> 29:14.440]  So you better know what you're doing and you better know it correctly.
[29:14.440 --> 29:19.640]  And every time I make one of these posts with these types of emails or conversations, my
[29:19.640 --> 29:24.720]  Facebook page just explodes because everybody's got an opinion on both sides of the fence.
[29:24.720 --> 29:28.720]  There are those that are going, I'm right, Eddie's right, he's done it this way, I know
[29:28.720 --> 29:31.640]  it works, he's taught me how to do it and I made it work, and then you've got those
[29:31.640 --> 29:36.000]  that are going to sit up there and argue, despite the fact that they have never won
[29:36.000 --> 29:40.320]  a single thing, they've never done a damn thing that they're telling you they're doing
[29:40.320 --> 29:44.400]  and you know they haven't done it because you know what happens when they do it.
[29:44.400 --> 29:50.840]  And yet they're saying it worked, baloney, there's no way it worked.
[29:50.840 --> 29:54.600]  At least if it's something did go your way, it was not because of what you're trying to
[29:54.600 --> 29:55.600]  claim it was.
[29:55.600 --> 30:01.680]  All right folks, so hang on, we'll be right back.
[30:01.680 --> 30:02.680]  Are you lucky?
[30:02.680 --> 30:07.160]  Researchers say living a termed life is more about the choices you make than fate.
[30:07.160 --> 30:11.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with four behaviors that increase your odds
[30:11.560 --> 30:15.480]  of finding a pot of gold at the end of your rainbow.
[30:15.480 --> 30:17.080]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.080 --> 30:20.680]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.680 --> 30:25.440]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.440 --> 30:30.440]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.440 --> 30:33.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.200 --> 30:36.760]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com.
[30:36.760 --> 30:41.040]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.040 --> 30:44.840]  Start over with start page.
[30:44.840 --> 30:48.840]  According to psychologist Richard Wiseman, people blessed with good fortune practice
[30:48.840 --> 30:51.400]  four behaviors that set them apart.
[30:51.400 --> 30:53.560]  Lucky people don't wait around for a windfall.
[30:53.560 --> 30:54.840]  They make what happen.
[30:54.840 --> 30:58.840]  They network and keep an eye out for opportunities, then they act on them.
[30:58.840 --> 31:02.440]  Lucky people develop their intuition and trust their gut feelings.
[31:02.440 --> 31:05.120]  Lucky people expect good things to happen to them.
[31:05.120 --> 31:09.600]  They persist in working toward their goals because they believe in positive outcomes.
[31:09.600 --> 31:13.000]  These expectations become self-fulfilling prophecies.
[31:13.000 --> 31:16.200]  And finally, lucky people turn lemons into lemonade.
[31:16.200 --> 31:17.920]  They don't dwell in setbacks.
[31:17.920 --> 31:22.680]  Rather, they find ways to take control and turn situations around in their favor.
[31:22.680 --> 31:24.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:24.520 --> 31:30.680]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.680 --> 31:36.080]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.080 --> 31:38.040]  The government says the fire brought it down.
[31:38.040 --> 31:43.120]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.120 --> 31:47.120]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow
[31:47.120 --> 31:48.560]  force responders have died.
[31:48.560 --> 31:50.040]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.040 --> 31:51.040]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.040 --> 31:52.040]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[31:52.040 --> 31:53.040]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.040 --> 31:55.040]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.040 --> 31:57.680]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.680 --> 32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.000 --> 32:05.040]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[32:05.040 --> 32:07.360]  In today's America, we live in a nuth against them society.
[32:07.360 --> 32:10.720]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to
[32:10.720 --> 32:12.720]  stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.720 --> 32:16.080]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.080 --> 32:20.080]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.080 --> 32:23.960]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:23.960 --> 32:25.360]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.360 --> 32:29.320]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.320 --> 32:33.080]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.080 --> 32:35.480]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.480 --> 32:39.440]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.440 --> 32:40.800]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.800 --> 32:44.120]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.120 --> 32:47.840]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:47.840 --> 32:50.880]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.880 --> 32:54.840]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.840 --> 33:01.840]  For your copy today and together, we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:24.840 --> 33:43.400]  Alright folks, we are back.
[33:43.400 --> 33:44.960]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:44.960 --> 33:48.600]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[33:48.600 --> 33:54.440]  If you want to give us a call and get in line, we will start talking to you here in just
[33:54.440 --> 33:57.880]  a second so that I can get this caller page under control here.
[33:57.880 --> 34:02.360]  Alright, right now we have Greg in Tennessee up on the board.
[34:02.360 --> 34:04.680]  Greg, what can we do for you?
[34:04.680 --> 34:05.680]  Yes, Eddie?
[34:05.680 --> 34:06.680]  Yes?
[34:06.680 --> 34:10.480]  I've got a couple questions on traffic.
[34:10.480 --> 34:11.480]  Okay.
[34:11.480 --> 34:16.480]  I've been getting, I think I'm being profiled.
[34:16.480 --> 34:22.920]  I've had the financial responsibility charges about twice in the last three months and
[34:22.920 --> 34:28.600]  this is the last time I got a speeding ticket with it.
[34:28.600 --> 34:33.640]  Before that, I have a few years of building code, people coming after me, so it ain't
[34:33.640 --> 34:38.800]  been pleasant.
[34:38.800 --> 34:41.680]  One question I've got.
[34:41.680 --> 34:48.360]  You know, I actually, at first seeing you and found out about Rule of Law Radio in 2013
[34:48.360 --> 34:51.560]  when you was on the Alex Jones show.
[34:51.560 --> 34:56.040]  I watched that and then I watched it again, you know, since then.
[34:56.040 --> 35:01.280]  But during that presentation, it's the air and a half movie I'm talking about or a documentary
[35:01.280 --> 35:02.280]  or whatever.
[35:02.280 --> 35:03.280]  Right.
[35:03.280 --> 35:07.680]  And are you talking about the two and a half hour presentation I did?
[35:07.680 --> 35:12.040]  I think it's about an hour and a half, the documentary movie, the one that was on the
[35:12.040 --> 35:14.480]  Alex Jones show.
[35:14.480 --> 35:18.600]  I don't know, well Alex has done several documentaries so I'm not sure which one you're
[35:18.600 --> 35:19.600]  talking about.
[35:19.600 --> 35:20.600]  Oh, okay.
[35:20.600 --> 35:21.600]  I don't know that.
[35:21.600 --> 35:22.600]  Okay.
[35:22.600 --> 35:27.080]  Well, I think it was 2013 when I first seen you on there a little bit.
[35:27.080 --> 35:30.800]  Well now, if you're talking about something you've seen where I'm on the show, that's
[35:30.800 --> 35:31.800]  not a documentary.
[35:31.800 --> 35:34.880]  That's actually an in-studio interview.
[35:34.880 --> 35:39.360]  So I mean, I don't remember any of them being an hour and a half except for the presentations
[35:39.360 --> 35:45.000]  I did, which Alex put up on YouTube separately from everything else.
[35:45.000 --> 35:50.280]  But in any case, what's your deal with it?
[35:50.280 --> 35:59.640]  Well, dear net presentation, the one I saw, and I'm sure it's been in some of your others,
[35:59.640 --> 36:04.680]  but you're saying that in Texas they call it the transportation code.
[36:04.680 --> 36:05.680]  Right.
[36:05.680 --> 36:07.360]  In Tennessee they call it the motor vehicle code.
[36:07.360 --> 36:10.600]  Yes, as they do in a lot of states.
[36:10.600 --> 36:18.440]  But dear net show, you was talking about, it was in almost all states that it was actually
[36:18.440 --> 36:27.960]  made for commercial drivers only, and it came along and rewrote the stuff, but they didn't
[36:27.960 --> 36:30.640]  really do it properly through the legislature.
[36:30.640 --> 36:33.120]  Is that pretty accurate?
[36:33.120 --> 36:36.920]  Well, the legislature didn't properly do it in accordance with Constitution.
[36:36.920 --> 36:40.840]  But yeah, they rewrote the statutes to do lots of things that it was not intended to
[36:40.840 --> 36:42.840]  do.
[36:42.840 --> 36:50.080]  Well, that's my grounds for this speeding ticket.
[36:50.080 --> 36:59.440]  I wrote a motion for dismissal, and obviously the insurance violation is completely ridiculous
[36:59.440 --> 37:08.680]  because the cop, you know, I showed him my insurance card and it was valid and I told
[37:08.680 --> 37:13.040]  the cop it wasn't on that vehicle, I was driving another person's car, but my insurance covers
[37:13.040 --> 37:17.040]  me on anything I have permission to drive, and I explained that to him.
[37:17.040 --> 37:23.080]  But the person who owned the vehicle also had insurance on it, and you know, it was
[37:23.080 --> 37:27.640]  just, I don't, he said it didn't show up in his computer, and I don't know if he's just
[37:27.640 --> 37:31.720]  lying or what, but so that was an easy win on that.
[37:31.720 --> 37:34.440]  But the speeding ticket I still got.
[37:34.440 --> 37:44.040]  So my, in the motion for dismissal, I stated what I just told you, that the legislature
[37:44.040 --> 37:51.120]  hadn't really properly changed the law, so it's no invoice, basically.
[37:51.120 --> 38:00.320]  So the judge told me that I needed to bring him something, some precedent or some law
[38:00.320 --> 38:03.160]  or something to show that.
[38:03.160 --> 38:08.440]  And I don't know where to get that, that's basically my main question.
[38:08.440 --> 38:12.440]  How do I show that the law is invalid?
[38:12.440 --> 38:16.480]  Well, let's go take some research on your part.
[38:16.480 --> 38:17.480]  Most of it historical.
[38:17.480 --> 38:21.400]  You've got to go back to the original enactment and show what the original intent and purpose
[38:21.400 --> 38:23.960]  of the legislation was.
[38:23.960 --> 38:30.280]  Most state laws began around the early 1900s, 1915 and so on and so forth that deal with
[38:30.280 --> 38:32.840]  this, okay?
[38:32.840 --> 38:43.480]  In 1925, it would appear in almost every state, 1925 was a magic year because everybody redid
[38:43.480 --> 38:47.920]  their legislative enactments, almost everybody anyway.
[38:47.920 --> 38:55.560]  Quite a few states in 1925 completely redid all of their statutes and repealed the originals
[38:55.560 --> 38:58.680]  and rewrote all brand new ones and reenacted them.
[38:58.680 --> 39:07.400]  Just setting the baseline for all future legislation relating to that topic, okay?
[39:07.400 --> 39:11.640]  And here in Texas, the Secretary of State will still tell you that every statute on
[39:11.640 --> 39:17.560]  the books must comport itself with the original legislation from 1925.
[39:17.560 --> 39:23.000]  If it fails to do that, then it's invalid, okay?
[39:23.000 --> 39:26.280]  So therein is what you need to figure out.
[39:26.280 --> 39:31.040]  When did the legislature repeal the original enactment and reenact it or did they simply
[39:31.040 --> 39:35.800]  amend the statute rather than the underlying law?
[39:35.800 --> 39:43.760]  That is the catch because they're not one in the same thing, never have been.
[39:43.760 --> 39:51.040]  Okay, this is exactly why the court tells you that we cannot accept you trying to introduce
[39:51.040 --> 39:57.480]  a statute as evidence of the law because it is not the law.
[39:57.480 --> 40:01.680]  That's why the courts won't accept a statute as evidence of the law.
[40:01.680 --> 40:05.840]  It's statutory prohibitive, I learned that word from your presentation.
[40:05.840 --> 40:06.840]  Yeah.
[40:06.840 --> 40:13.600]  So, if they're not accepting the statute as an accurate representation of the law as
[40:13.600 --> 40:19.040]  far as evidence in court, then how can it be evidence to convict you of a violation
[40:19.040 --> 40:21.080]  under that same law?
[40:21.080 --> 40:24.920]  It's just a logical imperative they can't seem to meet.
[40:24.920 --> 40:35.880]  Yeah, well, so I would research in the between 1900 and 1925 the...
[40:35.880 --> 40:39.640]  You're going to need to go to whatever your state or local law library is.
[40:39.640 --> 40:45.000]  Most major universities have a law library that is very similar to everything the state
[40:45.000 --> 40:50.400]  law library would have if you're not near a state law library and talk to the librarians.
[40:50.400 --> 40:52.480]  They're extremely helpful.
[40:52.480 --> 40:58.000]  Take the modern statute that you currently have and tell them I need to trace this back
[40:58.000 --> 41:03.560]  to its origins and they'll be more than happy to show you all the books that do that.
[41:03.560 --> 41:08.360]  You'll learn about research keys, you'll learn about how to track legislation backwards through
[41:08.360 --> 41:13.920]  their books and you'll learn how to pull up everything about that original legislation.
[41:13.920 --> 41:21.080]  The legislative bill, the floor arguments, the legislative journals, you'll be able to
[41:21.080 --> 41:26.800]  look at everything in relation to that law to understand it.
[41:26.800 --> 41:33.720]  Now the thing is, is the courts turn around and promptly ignore all of that, preferring
[41:33.720 --> 41:40.640]  instead to simply go with how some court ruled on it as what the law is, which most of them
[41:40.640 --> 41:42.880]  have never ruled on point.
[41:42.880 --> 41:51.720]  They have always subverted the facts by reapplying the statutory terminology even though no evidence
[41:51.720 --> 41:57.960]  exists of the regulated activity to which that terminology applies.
[41:57.960 --> 42:02.160]  See here in Texas it's very easy to argue that transportation is commerce because that's
[42:02.160 --> 42:04.320]  exactly how it's defined in other law.
[42:04.320 --> 42:09.080]  It's not defined in Texas law at all, but it has been defined by the United States Supreme
[42:09.080 --> 42:15.160]  Court and there is Texas law that says that when a term is used as a term of art or has
[42:15.160 --> 42:21.720]  acquired a particular meaning through whatever or is assigned a meaning by professionals
[42:21.720 --> 42:29.200]  in a given industry or art, then that is the definition the courts must use.
[42:29.200 --> 42:34.120]  And since Texas law does not define the term, they're stuck with what it means now, which
[42:34.120 --> 42:40.200]  is commerce or more accurately the movement of persons, goods, or property from point
[42:40.200 --> 42:45.680]  A to point B by a carrier, which is someone who is engaged in a business, occupation,
[42:45.680 --> 42:53.360]  or profession to charge money to move persons, goods, and property around and ship it and
[42:53.360 --> 42:54.360]  transport it.
[42:54.360 --> 42:58.520]  The United States Code still says they didn't try to change it?
[42:58.520 --> 43:02.840]  Well they're trying to argue that the states can act separately from the United States
[43:02.840 --> 43:05.320]  Code, which is true up to a point.
[43:05.320 --> 43:10.600]  They can act separately unless the legislation they're acting under is derived from that
[43:10.600 --> 43:12.320]  federal law.
[43:12.320 --> 43:15.720]  If it's an enactment of that federal law at the state level, they're stuck with what
[43:15.720 --> 43:17.760]  that federal law says.
[43:17.760 --> 43:20.040]  So there's two ways you can go about doing this.
[43:20.040 --> 43:25.560]  You can prove that either A, the legislature has records in effect that shows the courts
[43:25.560 --> 43:30.640]  are interpreting the law incorrectly because they are using terminology outside of its
[43:30.640 --> 43:37.040]  subject matter context that it's limited to as a matter of law, or that the states are
[43:37.040 --> 43:41.560]  attempting to act without proper jurisdiction to rewrite the federal law upon which their
[43:41.560 --> 43:43.560]  state law is based.
[43:43.560 --> 43:51.320]  Okay, so you've got to find where that base act was put in showing that it relied upon
[43:51.320 --> 43:53.800]  the federal law for its enactment.
[43:53.800 --> 43:56.280]  Hang on just a second and we'll finish this on the other side.
[43:56.280 --> 44:00.840]  Come on folks, we'll be right back.
[44:00.840 --> 44:04.040]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.040 --> 44:10.800]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[44:10.800 --> 44:14.560]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:14.560 --> 44:18.640]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.640 --> 44:22.720]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.720 --> 44:27.600]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.600 --> 44:34.400]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.400 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.240]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.240 --> 44:49.360]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.360 --> 44:56.080]  prosay tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:56.080 --> 45:03.640]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.640 --> 45:09.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come
[45:09.000 --> 45:14.480]  by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street Street D here in Austin, Texas behind Brave New Books
[45:14.480 --> 45:19.200]  and Chase May to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.200 --> 45:23.800]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.800 --> 45:27.920]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Emu Oil,
[45:27.920 --> 45:31.440]  Lotion Candles, Olive Oil Soaps, and Colloidal Silver and Gold.
[45:31.440 --> 45:38.480]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.480 --> 45:44.320]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.320 --> 45:48.680]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.680 --> 45:50.680]  Visit naturespureorganics.com.
[46:18.680 --> 46:25.680]  Take a look at our Miracle Healing Clay.
[46:48.680 --> 47:08.960]  Hi folks, we are back.
[47:08.960 --> 47:10.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[47:10.520 --> 47:17.040]  The calling number is 512-646-1984 and we are talking with Greg in Tennessee.
[47:17.040 --> 47:19.960]  All right Greg, go ahead.
[47:19.960 --> 47:27.760]  Yes, you had said that the judge likes to just rule on other cases and ignore how the
[47:27.760 --> 47:35.320]  whatever is law and if he did that then it would be useless to, in a lot of cases, probably
[47:35.320 --> 47:37.800]  a useless to appeal it.
[47:37.800 --> 47:39.800]  No, not necessarily.
[47:39.800 --> 47:40.800]  That's the thing.
[47:40.800 --> 47:45.800]  When a higher court has ruled one way and a lower court judge tries to rule differently,
[47:45.800 --> 47:51.160]  it's a precedent the lower court judge has no authority to overrule provided it's relevant
[47:51.160 --> 47:53.160]  to the actual facts of the case.
[47:53.160 --> 47:58.920]  Now again, a lot of people don't use on point case law and thus it makes it very easy for
[47:58.920 --> 48:03.040]  the court to ignore it because it's not on point with the facts of the case.
[48:03.040 --> 48:07.920]  The situation is not at all similar and thus the opinion is not at all applicable is the
[48:07.920 --> 48:08.920]  way that they do it.
[48:08.920 --> 48:16.080]  So, if I presented a pretty good argument then they would probably overturn it early
[48:16.080 --> 48:17.400]  how to have a chance.
[48:17.400 --> 48:22.840]  If the argument you're using shows that you're right and that the other court opinion agrees
[48:22.840 --> 48:28.080]  you're right and the judge attempts to overrule it anyway and ignore it, then yeah, on appeal
[48:28.080 --> 48:35.000]  they wouldn't have any choice but to overturn that court's ruling provided they don't wish
[48:35.000 --> 48:39.840]  to rewrite the law themselves and say that that ruling is no longer valid and we're
[48:39.840 --> 48:44.320]  going to rule this way today at the appellate level where the case precedent can actually
[48:44.320 --> 48:45.320]  occur.
[48:45.320 --> 48:46.320]  Yeah.
[48:46.320 --> 48:53.720]  Well, you know, they've rewritten this code again recently or I don't know if it's been
[48:53.720 --> 48:59.800]  a cumulative over time they just made changes a bunch but when I used to go and look at
[48:59.800 --> 49:07.400]  the code it was different, it was on Tennessee.gov and it didn't have all this like for instance
[49:07.400 --> 49:14.720]  right now Title 55 has 40 or 50 chapters in it and the first six chapters have a set of
[49:14.720 --> 49:25.600]  20 or 30 definitions and actually the moving violations is Title 8, I mean Chapter 8 and
[49:25.600 --> 49:32.840]  again and just those two chapters has 87 definitions.
[49:32.840 --> 49:37.520]  They define everything now, bicycles and everything, it's like I've never seen nothing
[49:37.520 --> 49:38.520]  like it.
[49:38.520 --> 49:43.360]  Yeah, but the thing is is the definition that they're putting in is still relevant to one
[49:43.360 --> 49:45.240]  subject and one subject only.
[49:45.240 --> 49:52.880]  For instance, in your state, does your state constitution under the legislative title or
[49:52.880 --> 49:58.920]  section of the constitution require the state legislature to specifically name the subject
[49:58.920 --> 50:05.120]  at which the legislation they are enacting applies to and is limited to?
[50:05.120 --> 50:08.960]  It's called the Single Subject Clause here in Texas we've got one.
[50:08.960 --> 50:11.400]  Article 3, Section 35.
[50:11.400 --> 50:12.960]  Okay.
[50:12.960 --> 50:16.120]  I don't know the answer.
[50:16.120 --> 50:19.560]  Well, the answer is almost certainly yes.
[50:19.560 --> 50:23.760]  I don't know of a state that doesn't have one, but I haven't specifically checked to
[50:23.760 --> 50:30.320]  see if Tennessee does, but I'm pretty sure it does.
[50:30.320 --> 50:35.040]  And so what you have to do is look at the original bill enacted by the legislature and
[50:35.040 --> 50:40.480]  the bill title, there should also be a clause in the legislative title of the constitution
[50:40.480 --> 50:50.840]  that says that the bill captioned slash title must state what that subject matter is.
[50:50.840 --> 51:00.440]  So what was the specific subject matter, regardless of what they're calling the code, what is
[51:00.440 --> 51:08.640]  the specific subject matter the legislature said all the statutes in that code apply to?
[51:08.640 --> 51:11.400]  Here in Texas it's transportation.
[51:11.400 --> 51:13.920]  And that's probably going to be commercial or something similar.
[51:13.920 --> 51:16.480]  Well, that's what you've got to find out.
[51:16.480 --> 51:21.840]  If they say the use of motor vehicles for blah, blah, blah, then you've got to figure
[51:21.840 --> 51:26.760]  out what the original meaning of motor vehicle is.
[51:26.760 --> 51:31.240]  Because now they're trying to hide it by saying a device that is self-propelled and used upon
[51:31.240 --> 51:36.080]  the highways to transport or draw persons or property.
[51:36.080 --> 51:37.080]  Okay?
[51:37.080 --> 51:38.080]  Yeah.
[51:38.080 --> 51:39.080]  Okay?
[51:39.080 --> 51:42.640]  What transports persons or property?
[51:42.640 --> 51:45.760]  Almost any kind of truck or bus, right?
[51:45.760 --> 51:48.880]  What draws persons or property?
[51:48.880 --> 51:52.680]  Anything that can pull a trailer, okay?
[51:52.680 --> 51:59.600]  So everything there we're talking about deals with transportation of persons or property.
[51:59.600 --> 52:01.840]  But it is always for commercial purposes.
[52:01.840 --> 52:02.840]  It's not for private.
[52:02.840 --> 52:03.840]  Never has been.
[52:03.840 --> 52:04.840]  Yeah.
[52:04.840 --> 52:12.040]  I need to go to a library where I can look at the actual bounds, I guess, black law books.
[52:12.040 --> 52:18.520]  Well, your legislative, your legislator should have a website where all of their legislation
[52:18.520 --> 52:22.680]  is online, at least from some certain year to current.
[52:22.680 --> 52:27.280]  Here we can go all the way back to 1985 unless they've changed it recently where we can go
[52:27.280 --> 52:28.280]  further.
[52:28.280 --> 52:34.880]  Yeah, you know, on your website where you link to all the different states and codes
[52:34.880 --> 52:35.880]  and all that.
[52:35.880 --> 52:36.880]  Right.
[52:36.880 --> 52:37.880]  Well, it doesn't work.
[52:37.880 --> 52:40.120]  It doesn't get nothing no more.
[52:40.120 --> 52:42.640]  And like I said, they've done away with it.
[52:42.640 --> 52:43.640]  It's not there.
[52:43.640 --> 52:45.640]  The only thing I can find is either...
[52:45.640 --> 52:47.560]  Well, they may have gone to some...
[52:47.560 --> 52:51.480]  They may have given Westlaw a contract to maintain it for them.
[52:51.480 --> 52:55.600]  A lot of states are no longer maintaining their own statutes online.
[52:55.600 --> 52:58.600]  They're paying some place like Westlaw to do it for them.
[52:58.600 --> 53:01.600]  Yeah, Lexus is what I've been finding.
[53:01.600 --> 53:04.320]  Well, Lexus is the research engine.
[53:04.320 --> 53:09.320]  But Westlaw can't charge you for access to the state legislative information.
[53:09.320 --> 53:14.880]  They have to put that up on the Internet so you can access it for free publicly.
[53:14.880 --> 53:18.840]  So what you've got to do is find out where that website now is.
[53:18.840 --> 53:22.040]  For instance, all you should have to do is go into Google and do a search for Tennessee
[53:22.040 --> 53:24.160]  laws, codes, and statutes.
[53:24.160 --> 53:26.240]  You should find all kinds of links.
[53:26.240 --> 53:28.920]  One of them should take you to the place where it currently is.
[53:28.920 --> 53:31.440]  Well, I got justia.com.
[53:31.440 --> 53:36.000]  Well, Justia, once again, is a case opinion research engine.
[53:36.000 --> 53:40.520]  Do not trust it as being current on legislation.
[53:40.520 --> 53:41.520]  I don't.
[53:41.520 --> 53:42.520]  I don't.
[53:42.520 --> 53:44.680]  And what about Lexus?
[53:44.680 --> 53:46.440]  Lexus has to keep it current.
[53:46.440 --> 53:48.440]  That's what they're getting paid for.
[53:48.440 --> 53:49.440]  Okay.
[53:49.440 --> 53:50.440]  Well, it's...
[53:50.440 --> 53:53.600]  But like I said, in that case, it's not Lexus.
[53:53.600 --> 53:58.880]  This is the case record research engine.
[53:58.880 --> 54:04.160]  Westlaw is the company that owns it, and Westlaw is the company being paid to maintain a lot
[54:04.160 --> 54:07.360]  of these state legislative websites.
[54:07.360 --> 54:08.360]  Okay.
[54:08.360 --> 54:15.480]  So even though Westlaw owns Lexus, the Lexus engine is not where you're going to find the
[54:15.480 --> 54:22.400]  statutory information I'm talking about, though it may link to it.
[54:22.400 --> 54:26.000]  So, using Lexus usually requires money.
[54:26.000 --> 54:31.360]  Well, then I think there's two versions of it.
[54:31.360 --> 54:35.760]  There's a free version that I've been looking at, and then I think there's like another
[54:35.760 --> 54:43.920]  version that does cost money that I haven't been on that one.
[54:43.920 --> 54:52.880]  So, well, I think that pretty much answers that question.
[54:52.880 --> 54:59.400]  The other question I have is, I'm these two police officers that I already beat the first
[54:59.400 --> 55:05.720]  financial responsibility charge because he didn't have any reason to pull me over.
[55:05.720 --> 55:09.200]  He just stopped me without calls and wrote me that.
[55:09.200 --> 55:11.200]  So I got that throwed out.
[55:11.200 --> 55:13.320]  I don't know exactly how.
[55:13.320 --> 55:15.880]  I think it was just a stroke of luck.
[55:15.880 --> 55:20.840]  The prosecutor was not the normal one that shows up.
[55:20.840 --> 55:25.080]  He went on vacation, and there was this other woman there, and she went up and had a little
[55:25.080 --> 55:28.320]  conference with the judge, and she just didn't want to go with it.
[55:28.320 --> 55:31.720]  She's thinking what was getting ready to happen, and she didn't want to go along with it.
[55:31.720 --> 55:35.000]  So that was just the lucky one.
[55:35.000 --> 55:44.120]  But these officers, though, I do want to file a professional complaint on them, so I need
[55:44.120 --> 55:47.560]  if you have like a template or tell me where I can go to get.
[55:47.560 --> 55:52.280]  Well, they're generally going to have you swear out a complaint on some form they've
[55:52.280 --> 55:55.840]  already got, or they're going to have you write it by hand on a pad.
[55:55.840 --> 55:57.520]  There's no particular form.
[55:57.520 --> 56:03.560]  All you have to do is write it up as a factual statement, like an affidavit.
[56:03.560 --> 56:07.760]  Just go online and do a search for affidavits for the state of Tennessee.
[56:07.760 --> 56:10.720]  You'll find something that will tell you what form an affidavit has to be in and what it
[56:10.720 --> 56:11.720]  has to contain.
[56:11.720 --> 56:12.720]  Right.
[56:12.720 --> 56:13.720]  I've already done that one.
[56:13.720 --> 56:14.720]  Okay.
[56:14.720 --> 56:15.720]  So what's your question?
[56:15.720 --> 56:23.440]  Well, I just, I already tried, back a few years ago, I tried to make a complaint on
[56:23.440 --> 56:26.040]  an officer, and nobody would take it.
[56:26.040 --> 56:32.200]  So I've since learned that I can take it to court and just give it to the judge, and
[56:32.200 --> 56:34.200]  he has to take it once he's seen it.
[56:34.200 --> 56:38.880]  He has to put his magistrate hat on and accept it.
[56:38.880 --> 56:40.720]  All right.
[56:40.720 --> 56:41.720]  Well, it depends.
[56:41.720 --> 56:49.000]  I mean, it depends on what he's doing at the time.
[56:49.000 --> 56:51.960]  Technically the law enforcement agency has to take it.
[56:51.960 --> 56:55.440]  If they don't, you can take it to the prosecuting attorney's office, whether it be the county
[56:55.440 --> 56:58.440]  or district attorney, whatever, whoever is available.
[56:58.440 --> 56:59.440]  Okay.
[56:59.440 --> 57:04.200]  And then the last course, you can take it to a judge, and then if the judge won't take
[57:04.200 --> 57:07.680]  it, you can deliver it directly to the grand jury yourself.
[57:07.680 --> 57:15.800]  Well, I've talked to Randy a few times, and he said, he said something that I know that
[57:15.800 --> 57:23.560]  from listening to your Alex Jones show thing, I saw, and I think the way they're doing
[57:23.560 --> 57:31.880]  the financial responsibility, you're saying it's invalid because of the due process violation.
[57:31.880 --> 57:34.560]  There seeming guilt instead of innocence.
[57:34.560 --> 57:39.080]  Here in Texas, the statute says you are presumed guilty.
[57:39.080 --> 57:44.800]  I think they're making you show proof and charge you with it if you can't show it.
[57:44.800 --> 57:45.800]  Yeah.
[57:45.800 --> 57:46.800]  But see, that's just it.
[57:46.800 --> 57:51.440]  That's something that's a reversal of the burden of proof.
[57:51.440 --> 57:55.520]  You get to be presumed guilty unless you give them evidence you're not.
[57:55.520 --> 57:57.600]  That is a violation of due process.
[57:57.600 --> 57:58.600]  Right.
[57:58.600 --> 58:02.800]  So, but you really can't win the case on that, right?
[58:02.800 --> 58:04.600]  Well, have you tried?
[58:04.600 --> 58:06.280]  I don't know why you couldn't.
[58:06.280 --> 58:10.520]  A rights violation is a rights violation regardless of the case.
[58:10.520 --> 58:13.160]  And that's definitely a due process rights violation.
[58:13.160 --> 58:16.080]  It could go all the way to the Supreme Court to tell them so.
[58:16.080 --> 58:20.520]  But that's what it would have to happen, most likely, because it is a flat out due process
[58:20.520 --> 58:21.520]  violation.
[58:21.520 --> 58:27.520]  Well, I have been thinking about that ever since the other, I don't know, a couple of
[58:27.520 --> 58:34.480]  weeks ago, when Randy said that he just happened to mention that if you, you probably can't
[58:34.480 --> 58:41.520]  beat the insurance law, it's a matter of public record, whether you have it or not, and you
[58:41.520 --> 58:43.160]  probably can't beat it.
[58:43.160 --> 58:44.960]  And I thought about that what you said.
[58:44.960 --> 58:45.960]  Well, hang on just a second.
[58:45.960 --> 58:47.680]  I got to break here and then we'll finish this up.
[58:47.680 --> 58:50.280]  Now hang on folks, we'll be right back.
[58:50.280 --> 58:55.720]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.720 --> 58:58.520]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.520 --> 59:03.920]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:03.920 --> 59:07.160]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.160 --> 59:08.960]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.960 --> 59:14.840]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.840 --> 59:18.600]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.600 --> 59:23.760]  Old and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into
[59:23.760 --> 59:28.280]  the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.280 --> 59:33.440]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.440 --> 59:43.880]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.880 --> 59:47.920]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.920 --> 59:54.920]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:17.920 --> 01:00:31.240]  Markets for the 11th of April, 2018, closed with gold $1,353.22 an ounce, silver $16.68
[01:00:31.240 --> 01:00:41.440]  an ounce, Texas crude $65.51 a barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80, bitcoin
[01:00:41.440 --> 01:00:51.440]  cash at $652.90, and finally litecoins at $114.34, a crypto coin.
[01:00:51.440 --> 01:01:01.360]  Today in history, the year 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01:01.360 --> 01:01:06.320]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color,
[01:01:06.320 --> 01:01:08.160]  religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:01:08.160 --> 01:01:13.360]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:01:13.360 --> 01:01:18.400]  in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:01:18.400 --> 01:01:20.240]  Today in history.
[01:01:20.240 --> 01:01:28.880]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack on civilians
[01:01:28.880 --> 01:01:33.120]  in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which is being blamed
[01:01:33.120 --> 01:01:37.720]  on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the United States
[01:01:37.720 --> 01:01:42.240]  and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as
[01:01:42.240 --> 01:01:43.240]  of yet.
[01:01:43.240 --> 01:01:47.200]  President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday, that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any
[01:01:47.200 --> 01:01:51.360]  and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice
[01:01:51.360 --> 01:01:55.960]  and new and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing
[01:01:55.960 --> 01:01:58.760]  animal who kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:01:58.760 --> 01:02:02.800]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[01:02:02.800 --> 01:02:07.680]  attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces, Syria and Russia on the other
[01:02:07.680 --> 01:02:12.560]  hand have given approval since yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical
[01:02:12.560 --> 01:02:16.000]  weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:19.560]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil
[01:02:19.560 --> 01:02:24.160]  war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[01:02:24.160 --> 01:02:28.920]  rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[01:02:28.920 --> 01:02:32.680]  notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:32.680 --> 01:02:38.000]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:42.360]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[01:02:42.360 --> 01:02:47.280]  has been fighting terrorists, or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[01:02:47.280 --> 01:02:51.360]  strike and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at.
[01:02:51.360 --> 01:03:04.680]  This was Frick Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:04.680 --> 01:03:33.820]  Rody QUINTON Presents
[01:03:33.820 --> 01:03:49.540]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:03:49.540 --> 01:03:55.340]  This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:55.340 --> 01:04:00.620]  Oh man, alright, let's get back on here with Greg and see if we can't get this wrapped
[01:04:00.620 --> 01:04:01.620]  up.
[01:04:01.620 --> 01:04:14.020]  Yeah, well, whenever I went to the arraignment the other day, well it's been a couple weeks,
[01:04:14.020 --> 01:04:20.580]  but I got a new date for the 26th, and that's because when the judge brought my, opened
[01:04:20.580 --> 01:04:30.940]  my file, I had some Randy's pleadings in there, the motion in Lemony, and I had my motion
[01:04:30.940 --> 01:04:36.700]  for dismissal, and the, I guess he called it the Mother Hovered motion, it's the only
[01:04:36.700 --> 01:04:40.660]  one that's like, I didn't, I just done the best I could with trying to find Presidents.
[01:04:40.660 --> 01:04:46.020]  I never did do very good trying to find matching Presidents for the Texas part.
[01:04:46.020 --> 01:04:56.020]  But anyway, the judge basically just looked at that and he said he'd just give the prosecutor
[01:04:56.020 --> 01:04:59.540]  a chance to respond, which I don't think they will.
[01:04:59.540 --> 01:05:03.260]  I think after they get to looking at all that, they're probably just not, they're gonna
[01:05:03.260 --> 01:05:07.460]  ignore it and try to just run me through like they do everybody else.
[01:05:07.460 --> 01:05:11.060]  They come up there, and they don't call it an arraignment.
[01:05:11.060 --> 01:05:15.300]  They say there's no arraignment for traffic court, and the prosecutor's not even there
[01:05:15.300 --> 01:05:21.340]  on your first, your first appearance, and they just basically expect you to plead guilty.
[01:05:21.340 --> 01:05:27.020]  The judge calls you up, he tells you how he's doing you a favor, and he's gonna waive the
[01:05:27.020 --> 01:05:30.780]  court cost, and he just basically tries to talk to you and plead guilty, and almost every
[01:05:30.780 --> 01:05:31.780]  one of them do that.
[01:05:31.780 --> 01:05:36.140]  Yeah, so it's for fair and impartial.
[01:05:36.140 --> 01:05:44.020]  And so they got it, and actually if you put up a fuss to that, and he did to me on the
[01:05:44.020 --> 01:05:49.700]  first time around, he ain't done it this time, but he basically coerced, he tried to coerce
[01:05:49.700 --> 01:05:51.300]  me, in my opinion.
[01:05:51.300 --> 01:05:58.100]  He told me that if, he told me that if I, you know, that he was helping me out, waving
[01:05:58.100 --> 01:06:05.300]  all the $27 of the court cost and stuff, and that if I tried to fight it and I lost, that
[01:06:05.300 --> 01:06:06.300]  he wouldn't do that.
[01:06:06.300 --> 01:06:10.740]  He'd give me the full court cost and all that, but that's just to give you an idea of what
[01:06:10.740 --> 01:06:11.740]  they do.
[01:06:11.740 --> 01:06:21.140]  And so anyway, here, where I'm getting to here on this question is, like, I don't believe
[01:06:21.140 --> 01:06:27.740]  that they'll respond to those motions in writing the way I call for them to do.
[01:06:27.740 --> 01:06:36.300]  So what I wondered is, if they don't, and I go back to court on the 26th, can I argue
[01:06:36.300 --> 01:06:42.100]  that the collateral stop will, that that's a judiciary admitted?
[01:06:42.100 --> 01:06:46.380]  You can argue that you have no way to verify the information given in their answer if it
[01:06:46.380 --> 01:06:51.260]  was not submitted in writing ahead of time, so that you had a chance to review it.
[01:06:51.260 --> 01:06:59.460]  Well, but, you know, like, is it a judicially admitted fact, according to the, even if I
[01:06:59.460 --> 01:07:05.540]  didn't have, like, you know, I was, like I said, I didn't have a, a, well, is what
[01:07:05.540 --> 01:07:10.860]  part of that a judicially admitted fact there, the judicial is not the one doing it opposing
[01:07:10.860 --> 01:07:18.500]  counsel is, so you have to object to the judge that they did not submit their answer in writing
[01:07:18.500 --> 01:07:24.460]  so that you had a chance to review the answer prior to the appearance date and thus have
[01:07:24.460 --> 01:07:29.660]  an opportunity to refute the alleged information and facts they're trying to spout in their
[01:07:29.660 --> 01:07:30.660]  answer.
[01:07:30.660 --> 01:07:37.260]  I see what you're saying, so, but, because my, my emotion for dismissal was kind of lousy.
[01:07:37.260 --> 01:07:42.100]  I don't, it's the first time I've ever done it, and I, and I'm not too good at it, and
[01:07:42.100 --> 01:07:44.500]  like I said, I didn't have the facts to back it up.
[01:07:44.500 --> 01:07:50.260]  I just said that the speeding violation did not occur, and I, I, the only reason I stated
[01:07:50.260 --> 01:07:57.900]  was because the, the laws was for commercial, you know, vehicles.
[01:07:57.900 --> 01:08:04.220]  Let me, let me ask you this question, does Tennessee have prima facie speed limits?
[01:08:04.220 --> 01:08:06.500]  What does that mean?
[01:08:06.500 --> 01:08:09.660]  It means you didn't read the statute on speeding, did you?
[01:08:09.660 --> 01:08:12.300]  Yes, I, I did read the statute on speeding.
[01:08:12.300 --> 01:08:16.580]  You did, and it didn't tell you that it was prima facie?
[01:08:16.580 --> 01:08:18.260]  I don't think so.
[01:08:18.260 --> 01:08:20.380]  I don't know what that word means, but.
[01:08:20.380 --> 01:08:27.180]  Prima facie is Latin for on its face, which are basically at first glance, okay?
[01:08:27.180 --> 01:08:34.420]  What it means is that the maximum speed limit at first glance is whatever's on this sign,
[01:08:34.420 --> 01:08:39.620]  but the fact is you can probably go faster and nothing bad will happen.
[01:08:39.620 --> 01:08:42.940]  A prima facie speed limit is not fixed.
[01:08:42.940 --> 01:08:45.940]  It is not stoned.
[01:08:45.940 --> 01:08:50.380]  In other words, you can go faster or slower, and they can't charge you with a crime simply
[01:08:50.380 --> 01:08:53.900]  because of that.
[01:08:53.900 --> 01:09:00.900]  A prima facie speed limit requires other facts and circumstances in order for a violation
[01:09:00.900 --> 01:09:03.020]  to occur.
[01:09:03.020 --> 01:09:10.300]  99 times out of 100, the statute specifically states that what has to occur is a collision
[01:09:10.300 --> 01:09:14.820]  with another person or vehicle either already lawfully upon or entering the highway, and
[01:09:14.820 --> 01:09:20.860]  that the reason for the collision was your failure to control the speed of your vehicle.
[01:09:20.860 --> 01:09:25.540]  Yes, I remember that, and that makes sense.
[01:09:25.540 --> 01:09:28.100]  I did state in my motion for dismissal.
[01:09:28.100 --> 01:09:36.580]  I stated that for the traffic conditions and weather conditions or whatever that I was
[01:09:36.580 --> 01:09:40.860]  traveling at a safe speed, you know, it's not real terrible.
[01:09:40.860 --> 01:09:41.860]  I covered...
[01:09:41.860 --> 01:09:48.700]  The only thing I don't have is a point at the law proving me right.
[01:09:48.700 --> 01:09:50.420]  I've got everything else covered pretty good.
[01:09:50.420 --> 01:09:54.900]  It's written decent, you know.
[01:09:54.900 --> 01:09:58.420]  The officer was really bad.
[01:09:58.420 --> 01:10:02.060]  He kept my license and everything.
[01:10:02.060 --> 01:10:04.460]  He built out the complaint.
[01:10:04.460 --> 01:10:05.860]  The complaint was wrong.
[01:10:05.860 --> 01:10:13.900]  His ticket, he got the wrong making model of the truck, and he said he couldn't...
[01:10:13.900 --> 01:10:20.780]  The website that showed that the truck didn't have insurance on it specifically, which is
[01:10:20.780 --> 01:10:21.780]  not the case.
[01:10:21.780 --> 01:10:24.740]  I mean, he did everything wrong.
[01:10:24.740 --> 01:10:25.740]  He actually...
[01:10:25.740 --> 01:10:32.740]  You know, it's actually the first time I've ever been cited for exceeding the traffic
[01:10:32.740 --> 01:10:37.300]  sign, you know, when I wasn't doing it.
[01:10:37.300 --> 01:10:42.340]  I was probably about right at the speed limit.
[01:10:42.340 --> 01:10:43.340]  I wasn't even...
[01:10:43.340 --> 01:10:47.540]  I thought I was doing 46 and a 35 and it's just not the case.
[01:10:47.540 --> 01:10:49.060]  I wasn't doing it.
[01:10:49.060 --> 01:10:51.740]  I had just turned on the road and I hadn't even...
[01:10:51.740 --> 01:10:55.460]  He came up to the window and said to me, well, you just flying around through there, you
[01:10:55.460 --> 01:11:01.020]  passing all in cars instead and I said, you must have got the wrong person.
[01:11:01.020 --> 01:11:02.340]  And you know what he said?
[01:11:02.340 --> 01:11:03.340]  He said no.
[01:11:03.340 --> 01:11:06.900]  He said the radar picks up the fastest moving vehicle.
[01:11:06.900 --> 01:11:09.380]  So he showed right there he don't know how radar works too.
[01:11:09.380 --> 01:11:10.380]  No.
[01:11:10.380 --> 01:11:12.460]  He has no clue whatsoever.
[01:11:12.460 --> 01:11:16.580]  Because it picks up the biggest vehicle, even almost most lay people either.
[01:11:16.580 --> 01:11:18.460]  Well, that's not necessarily true either.
[01:11:18.460 --> 01:11:19.900]  It's not the biggest either.
[01:11:19.900 --> 01:11:23.620]  It is the one that reflects the strongest signal back.
[01:11:23.620 --> 01:11:30.820]  So it could be a smaller car, but with a more broad side angle that presents a larger surface
[01:11:30.820 --> 01:11:36.820]  area that would be hitting rather than a big truck going away from the radar gun.
[01:11:36.820 --> 01:11:41.740]  There's all kinds of ways that the radar works, but about signal is the premise of what it
[01:11:41.740 --> 01:11:43.140]  does.
[01:11:43.140 --> 01:11:49.740]  And the biggest surface area produces the strongest bounce signal, but there is no way
[01:11:49.740 --> 01:11:56.940]  that radar can tell you which object, or at least not the radar they're using, which object
[01:11:56.940 --> 01:11:59.620]  that signal is coming from.
[01:11:59.620 --> 01:12:00.860]  Right.
[01:12:00.860 --> 01:12:08.460]  Well, I've got several statements of facts against the officer in my dismissal of motion
[01:12:08.460 --> 01:12:09.980]  too.
[01:12:09.980 --> 01:12:16.980]  I don't know, the whole thing is ridiculous if he was just sitting there waiting on me
[01:12:16.980 --> 01:12:17.980]  to come by.
[01:12:17.980 --> 01:12:19.980]  You know what I mean?
[01:12:19.980 --> 01:12:28.660]  I've just been around and around with this stuff for so long and I'm completely sick
[01:12:28.660 --> 01:12:29.660]  of it.
[01:12:29.660 --> 01:12:31.940]  You know, I've yet to pay him a penny.
[01:12:31.940 --> 01:12:33.340]  I've won every time I went to court.
[01:12:33.340 --> 01:12:36.660]  I'll be building code stuff and everything.
[01:12:36.660 --> 01:12:47.380]  So far, it's cost me a lot of money in missed work and that way.
[01:12:47.380 --> 01:12:56.380]  And if I kill him my time, that's pretty rough too, but anyway, I think if I can figure
[01:12:56.380 --> 01:13:02.900]  out how to follow a complaint on these two officers, I think, and get past this speeding
[01:13:02.900 --> 01:13:05.380]  ticket here, I think they might leave me alone.
[01:13:05.380 --> 01:13:08.260]  I might get on a list where they're like I used to be on.
[01:13:08.260 --> 01:13:12.460]  They won't, they won't want me in court no more.
[01:13:12.460 --> 01:13:14.340]  They're losing money on me.
[01:13:14.340 --> 01:13:26.140]  So anyway, I sure appreciate your time and your material online and stuff and Randy and
[01:13:26.140 --> 01:13:31.820]  everybody has been a big help because like I say, I'm doing all this stuff for the first
[01:13:31.820 --> 01:13:34.180]  time and I have no idea what I'm doing.
[01:13:34.180 --> 01:13:39.980]  So anyway, we have good night and I appreciate your help.
[01:13:39.980 --> 01:13:42.380]  Yes or no problem.
[01:13:42.380 --> 01:13:53.620]  I'm actually sitting here looking at the Tennessee statutes on speeding and everything appears
[01:13:53.620 --> 01:13:57.740]  to go exactly like what I was talking about.
[01:13:57.740 --> 01:14:04.460]  And it all relates to whether or not you've collided with another car.
[01:14:04.460 --> 01:14:06.940]  Yeah, well I didn't.
[01:14:06.940 --> 01:14:12.180]  And I remember that from your seminar thing too, you said that.
[01:14:12.180 --> 01:14:18.460]  If there's no, that's kind of in line with it, if there's no victim, there's no crime
[01:14:18.460 --> 01:14:19.460]  sort of.
[01:14:19.460 --> 01:14:20.460]  Right.
[01:14:20.460 --> 01:14:23.740]  Well, that's the way the statute is supposed to work.
[01:14:23.740 --> 01:14:29.860]  Most of these codes that they're trying to use as enforceable law are actually originally
[01:14:29.860 --> 01:14:31.740]  enacted as remedial law.
[01:14:31.740 --> 01:14:36.820]  In other words, they're there to provide remedy for injury.
[01:14:36.820 --> 01:14:43.460]  So basically in order to get charged with speeding and thus the person that you injured
[01:14:43.460 --> 01:14:51.540]  or did property damage to, to have remedy, the law has to provide them with one.
[01:14:51.540 --> 01:14:57.180]  So the law specifically is written to say, okay, if you fail to control the speed of
[01:14:57.180 --> 01:15:04.260]  your vehicle in such a manner as to collide with another person or their vehicle or some
[01:15:04.260 --> 01:15:11.140]  other property identified by statute that is already lawfully upon or entering the highway,
[01:15:11.140 --> 01:15:15.820]  then you injured them in a way that the law must give them remedy for and this statute
[01:15:15.820 --> 01:15:20.780]  is going to charge you with an offense for which they can claim a remedy.
[01:15:20.780 --> 01:15:22.180]  That's the whole purpose of those statutes.
[01:15:22.180 --> 01:15:24.900]  It's got nothing to do with regulation.
[01:15:24.900 --> 01:15:29.820]  It's got everything to do with providing remedy.
[01:15:29.820 --> 01:15:34.940]  That's why when you go read the original legislation, you will find where it is discussed a lot
[01:15:34.940 --> 01:15:43.740]  of times where it says this is a remedial law bill and that's what it means.
[01:15:43.740 --> 01:15:49.220]  It is a law to provide remedy, not regulation, remedy.
[01:15:49.220 --> 01:15:56.620]  So that if this section is violated by someone who caused an injury, then the offense stated
[01:15:56.620 --> 01:16:01.340]  provides a cause of action for the other individual to make a claim upon.
[01:16:01.340 --> 01:16:04.020]  That's what it was originally all about.
[01:16:04.020 --> 01:16:07.500]  That's astounding, isn't it?
[01:16:07.500 --> 01:16:09.860]  How they can twist it around into something new now?
[01:16:09.860 --> 01:16:10.860]  Right.
[01:16:10.860 --> 01:16:14.860]  Even if the judge knows that, I'm not going to be able to have him admit that in open
[01:16:14.860 --> 01:16:15.860]  court.
[01:16:15.860 --> 01:16:16.860]  He's never going to admit it.
[01:16:16.860 --> 01:16:20.500]  They're even more so that he doesn't actually know it because he doesn't actually care to
[01:16:20.500 --> 01:16:22.020]  know what the law is.
[01:16:22.020 --> 01:16:25.540]  He only cares about whether or not he's going to get paid at the end of the day and the
[01:16:25.540 --> 01:16:29.220]  only way he's going to do that is to take your money.
[01:16:29.220 --> 01:16:32.460]  Yes, that's really common.
[01:16:32.460 --> 01:16:35.420]  These officers out here, they don't know the law either.
[01:16:35.420 --> 01:16:39.700]  I've been, the other time when I tried, like I was killing you a few years back, I tried
[01:16:39.700 --> 01:16:48.620]  to file a complaint on an officer and then he had out here the music.
[01:16:48.620 --> 01:16:50.260]  Yes, I've got to take another break, Greg.
[01:16:50.260 --> 01:16:52.860]  I'm sorry, man, but I've got to get the other callers when I get back.
[01:16:52.860 --> 01:16:54.020]  I appreciate you calling in.
[01:16:54.020 --> 01:16:55.020]  I wish you luck, okay?
[01:16:55.020 --> 01:16:56.020]  All right.
[01:16:56.020 --> 01:16:57.020]  All right.
[01:16:57.020 --> 01:16:58.020]  Thanks for calling.
[01:16:58.020 --> 01:16:59.020]  You'll have to be right back.
[01:16:59.020 --> 01:17:09.420]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway, sponsored by
[01:17:09.420 --> 01:17:10.420]  Central Texas GunWorks.
[01:17:10.420 --> 01:17:15.380]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:15.380 --> 01:17:18.860]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:18.860 --> 01:17:25.620]  From Central Texas GunWorks, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[01:17:25.620 --> 01:17:28.420]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:28.420 --> 01:17:34.500]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:34.500 --> 01:17:38.380]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:38.380 --> 01:17:42.300]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:42.300 --> 01:17:47.460]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can
[01:17:47.460 --> 01:17:51.980]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:17:51.980 --> 01:17:55.180]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.180 --> 01:18:00.500]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.500 --> 01:18:01.500]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.500 --> 01:18:05.020]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:05.020 --> 01:18:07.660]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.660 --> 01:18:08.860]  I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.860 --> 01:18:10.860]  I'd be lost without logos.
[01:18:10.860 --> 01:18:13.580]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.580 --> 01:18:17.300]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[01:18:17.300 --> 01:18:20.700]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.700 --> 01:18:22.220]  How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.220 --> 01:18:24.180]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.180 --> 01:18:28.580]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies
[01:18:28.580 --> 01:18:29.580]  or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.580 --> 01:18:31.700]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.700 --> 01:18:35.180]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:35.180 --> 01:18:37.900]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.900 --> 01:18:43.740]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.740 --> 01:18:44.740]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.740 --> 01:18:45.740]  No.
[01:18:45.740 --> 01:18:47.460]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.460 --> 01:18:48.460]  No.
[01:18:48.460 --> 01:18:49.460]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:18:49.460 --> 01:18:50.460]  No.
[01:18:50.460 --> 01:18:51.460]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.460 --> 01:18:52.460]  Wow.
[01:18:52.460 --> 01:18:54.460]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.460 --> 01:18:55.460]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.460 --> 01:18:56.460]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.460 --> 01:18:57.460]  We are Logos.
[01:18:57.460 --> 01:18:58.460]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:58.460 --> 01:19:05.460]  Logos, Logos, Radio.
[01:19:05.460 --> 01:19:24.820]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I take a look at my life and realize
[01:19:24.820 --> 01:19:33.620]  there's nothing left because I've been racking and laughing so long that even my mama thinks
[01:19:33.620 --> 01:19:38.860]  that my mind is gone, but I ain't never crossed a man that didn't deserve it, maybe treated
[01:19:38.860 --> 01:19:39.860]  like a punk.
[01:19:39.860 --> 01:19:40.860]  You know that's a lie.
[01:19:40.860 --> 01:19:41.860]  All right.
[01:19:41.860 --> 01:19:42.860]  Here we are.
[01:19:42.860 --> 01:19:48.020]  Still trying to teach you all how to function in gangsters' paradise, and yet everybody
[01:19:48.020 --> 01:19:50.660]  is so willing to get themselves shot in the head.
[01:19:50.660 --> 01:19:52.660]  What do you think about that?
[01:19:52.660 --> 01:19:56.860]  Oh, well, we've got to do what we've got to do, right?
[01:19:56.860 --> 01:19:57.860]  All right.
[01:19:57.860 --> 01:20:01.660]  That being said, let's get on to Charles in Texas.
[01:20:01.660 --> 01:20:03.660]  Charles, what do you got?
[01:20:03.660 --> 01:20:08.660]  Well, actually, it's a clap on my back for you.
[01:20:08.660 --> 01:20:09.660]  Okay.
[01:20:09.660 --> 01:20:10.660]  You have time.
[01:20:10.660 --> 01:20:11.660]  Am I choking on something?
[01:20:11.660 --> 01:20:12.660]  Keep myself.
[01:20:12.660 --> 01:20:14.660]  I hope not.
[01:20:14.660 --> 01:20:22.660]  No, you taught me how to make five judges recuse themselves from a case, racking them
[01:20:22.660 --> 01:20:25.660]  off and made the sixth one run into a hide and hold.
[01:20:25.660 --> 01:20:26.660]  Well, cool.
[01:20:26.660 --> 01:20:27.660]  You taught me.
[01:20:27.660 --> 01:20:31.660]  You didn't use that gasoline Molotov cocktail thing, did you?
[01:20:31.660 --> 01:20:32.660]  No.
[01:20:32.660 --> 01:20:33.660]  Okay.
[01:20:33.660 --> 01:20:37.660]  No, actually, I didn't have enough money for gasoline that day.
[01:20:37.660 --> 01:20:38.660]  All right.
[01:20:38.660 --> 01:20:44.660]  But you also helped me fight a county judge and fight that to a standstill.
[01:20:44.660 --> 01:20:46.660]  And truth is infection.
[01:20:46.660 --> 01:20:51.660]  Truth is infection, because there's an 18-year-old there who happened to have the same problem.
[01:20:51.660 --> 01:20:56.660]  And I gave him a sample of the stuff, a sample of what I was using.
[01:20:56.660 --> 01:21:01.660]  And not only did he go and fight his case and win, but he also went and his dad bought
[01:21:01.660 --> 01:21:06.660]  him the seminar to help him in kinds of future need.
[01:21:06.660 --> 01:21:07.660]  Well, cool.
[01:21:07.660 --> 01:21:13.660]  Where are you guys when I need the testimonials up on my legal blog?
[01:21:13.660 --> 01:21:18.660]  Guys, y'all really, when y'all do win, y'all please let me know.
[01:21:18.660 --> 01:21:21.660]  Provide me with copies of the court paperwork from their side.
[01:21:21.660 --> 01:21:23.660]  I don't need the pleadings you filed.
[01:21:23.660 --> 01:21:24.660]  I get all that.
[01:21:24.660 --> 01:21:31.660]  But as far as the signed order dismissing or finding you not guilty or whatever, please,
[01:21:31.660 --> 01:21:35.660]  y'all, if you want to redact it or I can do it, if you want it redacted, just send me
[01:21:35.660 --> 01:21:41.660]  something I can put up and show that we are being successful by doing it the correct way.
[01:21:41.660 --> 01:21:45.660]  It's hard enough to convince people you know what you're talking about when they are listening
[01:21:45.660 --> 01:21:48.660]  to morons before they start listening to you.
[01:21:48.660 --> 01:21:53.660]  And what you're telling them doesn't jive with what they think they know.
[01:21:53.660 --> 01:21:58.660]  So you've got to give them something to say, look, here's proof positive that what I tell
[01:21:58.660 --> 01:22:03.660]  you now is the same as I told this guy, and if you will do it like I told this guy, you
[01:22:03.660 --> 01:22:05.660]  will prevail.
[01:22:05.660 --> 01:22:09.660]  And if you don't prevail at step one, then you follow it through and prevail at step two,
[01:22:09.660 --> 01:22:14.660]  and you keep going until you have eliminated all the steps and still lost.
[01:22:14.660 --> 01:22:17.660]  Otherwise, you can't say that you lost.
[01:22:17.660 --> 01:22:20.660]  You can only say you gave up.
[01:22:20.660 --> 01:22:22.660]  That's right.
[01:22:22.660 --> 01:22:26.660]  I had to redact the letters that were, the judges recused and stuff.
[01:22:26.660 --> 01:22:30.660]  In fact, one of them recused the stuff not from that case but from all the cases previously,
[01:22:30.660 --> 01:22:35.660]  which I don't know how that worked, but you know, she decided she wouldn't be involved
[01:22:35.660 --> 01:22:37.660]  in anything with my name on it.
[01:22:37.660 --> 01:22:39.660]  And I don't have a problem.
[01:22:39.660 --> 01:22:40.660]  I'll send that to you.
[01:22:40.660 --> 01:22:41.660]  Okay.
[01:22:41.660 --> 01:22:43.660]  That was actually the funniest one of all of them.
[01:22:43.660 --> 01:22:45.660]  But you do make a difference.
[01:22:45.660 --> 01:22:49.660]  And these people need to get off their butt and they need to realize, hey, this is a good
[01:22:49.660 --> 01:22:50.660]  thing.
[01:22:50.660 --> 01:22:51.660]  We can't let this go.
[01:22:51.660 --> 01:22:52.660]  It's like a pearl.
[01:22:52.660 --> 01:22:53.660]  Like that pearl, man.
[01:22:53.660 --> 01:22:55.660]  You've got to keep that pearl.
[01:22:55.660 --> 01:22:58.660]  I'm going to let you go because I know other people need your help.
[01:22:58.660 --> 01:23:00.660]  All right.
[01:23:00.660 --> 01:23:02.660]  Well, thanks for calling in, Charles.
[01:23:02.660 --> 01:23:03.660]  I appreciate it.
[01:23:03.660 --> 01:23:04.660]  You're very welcome, sir.
[01:23:04.660 --> 01:23:05.660]  All right.
[01:23:05.660 --> 01:23:06.660]  Thanks, sir.
[01:23:06.660 --> 01:23:07.660]  You're welcome.
[01:23:07.660 --> 01:23:08.660]  Bye-bye.
[01:23:08.660 --> 01:23:09.660]  Bye-bye.
[01:23:09.660 --> 01:23:10.660]  All right.
[01:23:10.660 --> 01:23:11.660]  Now we have James in Texas.
[01:23:11.660 --> 01:23:14.660]  James, what can we do for you?
[01:23:14.660 --> 01:23:17.660]  Well, I called in last week for the first time.
[01:23:17.660 --> 01:23:20.660]  I'm the one at 4,500 North Street, Nagadoges.
[01:23:20.660 --> 01:23:21.660]  Ah, okay.
[01:23:21.660 --> 01:23:22.660]  Yes, sir.
[01:23:22.660 --> 01:23:23.660]  And yeah.
[01:23:23.660 --> 01:23:27.660]  Well, you know, I didn't have a problem.
[01:23:27.660 --> 01:23:30.660]  Before I talked to you Monday, but I got one now.
[01:23:30.660 --> 01:23:31.660]  Uh-oh.
[01:23:31.660 --> 01:23:34.660]  I got a speeding ticket Thursday.
[01:23:34.660 --> 01:23:38.660]  And like I said, I'm not going to take up a lot of time.
[01:23:38.660 --> 01:23:40.660]  Municipal or county?
[01:23:40.660 --> 01:23:42.660]  JP Court.
[01:23:42.660 --> 01:23:43.660]  Okay.
[01:23:43.660 --> 01:23:46.660]  Which JP?
[01:23:46.660 --> 01:23:48.660]  Precinct two.
[01:23:48.660 --> 01:23:52.660]  Is that the lady in the Sheriff's Department office?
[01:23:52.660 --> 01:23:55.660]  Honestly, I haven't even looked yet to see.
[01:23:55.660 --> 01:24:01.660]  I've been dealing with my daughter and getting her to go to school and all that.
[01:24:01.660 --> 01:24:10.660]  Well, there is a specific motion to dismiss for any speeding charge in Texas already
[01:24:10.660 --> 01:24:14.660]  up on my blog that you can download, edit, and file.
[01:24:14.660 --> 01:24:15.660]  Okay.
[01:24:15.660 --> 01:24:21.660]  Well, what we talked about last week was the constitutional challenge motion.
[01:24:21.660 --> 01:24:23.660]  It hadn't got it.
[01:24:23.660 --> 01:24:30.660]  I did send you an email, you know, I ordered it back in March.
[01:24:30.660 --> 01:24:31.660]  Okay.
[01:24:31.660 --> 01:24:36.660]  And like I said, I wasn't in any big hurry, but no, honestly, the only reason I wanted
[01:24:36.660 --> 01:24:40.660]  to call you now, I'm going to be in Austin Sunday through Tuesday.
[01:24:40.660 --> 01:24:41.660]  Okay.
[01:24:41.660 --> 01:24:47.660]  And so if you need help, if you need somebody to help you work on your...
[01:24:47.660 --> 01:24:49.660]  Oh, well, I appreciate that.
[01:24:49.660 --> 01:24:52.660]  I actually saw the email for that and I meant to reply back to it.
[01:24:52.660 --> 01:24:54.660]  But I got caught up in something else.
[01:24:54.660 --> 01:24:56.660]  I haven't actually started building the thing yet.
[01:24:56.660 --> 01:25:01.660]  I'm still waiting on the funding because I still have to finish writing the contract
[01:25:01.660 --> 01:25:03.660]  to get the funding.
[01:25:03.660 --> 01:25:06.660]  And then I've got to finish the design work.
[01:25:06.660 --> 01:25:10.660]  I haven't even got all that finished yet because I'm still having a real problem
[01:25:10.660 --> 01:25:13.660]  finding a supplier for the poly pipe.
[01:25:13.660 --> 01:25:18.660]  Everybody's got poly tubing, but nobody's got poly pipe.
[01:25:18.660 --> 01:25:24.660]  Well, that just disappoints me because now I'm going to be sitting in my daughter's
[01:25:24.660 --> 01:25:29.660]  apartment for three days picking my nose and it's going to be sore by the time I leave.
[01:25:29.660 --> 01:25:30.660]  Well, do me a favor.
[01:25:30.660 --> 01:25:31.660]  Don't take videos.
[01:25:31.660 --> 01:25:32.660]  Okay.
[01:25:32.660 --> 01:25:34.660]  I was hoping you could...
[01:25:34.660 --> 01:25:40.660]  Well, I would if I'd gotten it far yet, but with as many things as I've got on my plate
[01:25:40.660 --> 01:25:45.660]  every single day, I'm lucky I have time to sit down and even think about it.
[01:25:45.660 --> 01:25:48.660]  It's less than anything done with it.
[01:25:48.660 --> 01:25:49.660]  Yeah.
[01:25:49.660 --> 01:25:52.660]  But anyway, that's all I got.
[01:25:52.660 --> 01:25:58.660]  Get a chance to shoot me that constitutional motion or challenge motion.
[01:25:58.660 --> 01:26:01.660]  Yeah, I actually spent most of the day going over that motion.
[01:26:01.660 --> 01:26:05.660]  I'm trying to get a rewrite of it done as we speak.
[01:26:05.660 --> 01:26:10.660]  But I'm telling you that the speeding motion that I've got up there is a whole lot easier
[01:26:10.660 --> 01:26:12.660]  to understand and use.
[01:26:12.660 --> 01:26:16.660]  This constitutional challenge motion is 74 pages long.
[01:26:16.660 --> 01:26:19.660]  It's got a ton of stuff in it.
[01:26:19.660 --> 01:26:21.660]  I understand that.
[01:26:21.660 --> 01:26:23.660]  So you are going to be...
[01:26:23.660 --> 01:26:24.660]  Start studying.
[01:26:24.660 --> 01:26:28.660]  Yeah, you're going to be fighting an uphill battle trying to get all that information into
[01:26:28.660 --> 01:26:30.660]  a judge's ears.
[01:26:30.660 --> 01:26:31.660]  Okay.
[01:26:31.660 --> 01:26:35.660]  But that speeding is very straightforward and very simple.
[01:26:35.660 --> 01:26:40.660]  The statute itself makes it impossible for them to charge you with it validly unless you
[01:26:40.660 --> 01:26:42.660]  hit somebody.
[01:26:42.660 --> 01:26:49.660]  Well, but when they won't let you enter the or introduce the statute into...
[01:26:49.660 --> 01:26:52.660]  You don't need to introduce the statute.
[01:26:52.660 --> 01:26:58.660]  You've got to get the cop to testify to it and you can introduce it through judicial notice.
[01:26:58.660 --> 01:26:59.660]  Okay.
[01:26:59.660 --> 01:27:06.660]  The Texas Rules of Evidence and require that the court take judicial notice of a statute
[01:27:06.660 --> 01:27:10.660]  if you file the notice in writing.
[01:27:10.660 --> 01:27:11.660]  That's the key.
[01:27:11.660 --> 01:27:12.660]  Gotcha.
[01:27:12.660 --> 01:27:19.660]  You have to file a notice in writing.
[01:27:19.660 --> 01:27:20.660]  Okay.
[01:27:20.660 --> 01:27:30.660]  So what you want is you want to file a written notice, a judicial notice, naming 201.904.545.323
[01:27:30.660 --> 01:27:39.660]  or I'm sorry, 545.351 and 352.
[01:27:39.660 --> 01:27:42.660]  Okay.
[01:27:42.660 --> 01:27:44.660]  Forget the 323.
[01:27:44.660 --> 01:27:48.660]  That's another statute I was thinking of the Information Act, which is 552323.
[01:27:48.660 --> 01:27:53.660]  But yeah, 201.904, 545.351 and 352.
[01:27:53.660 --> 01:27:56.660]  Those are the speeding statutes that make it very, very clear.
[01:27:56.660 --> 01:28:02.660]  You cannot get charges speeding except for under the specific conditions put in that motion
[01:28:02.660 --> 01:28:07.660]  and you will not qualify for 90% of them, guaranteed.
[01:28:07.660 --> 01:28:12.660]  And they have to prove all of them, which they can't do.
[01:28:12.660 --> 01:28:19.660]  Well, I got that, but you know, and I'll say this, the two deputies, of course,
[01:28:19.660 --> 01:28:26.660]  the deputies pulled me over, well, one, and he almost immediately called for backup
[01:28:26.660 --> 01:28:32.660]  because they never would tell me I was in a custodial arrest.
[01:28:32.660 --> 01:28:33.660]  Never.
[01:28:33.660 --> 01:28:34.660]  Yeah, they don't want to.
[01:28:34.660 --> 01:28:37.660]  Be entertained, be entertained, be entertained, yeah.
[01:28:37.660 --> 01:28:44.660]  And I finally, when they, they weren't ugly, they weren't yelling, they weren't cursing,
[01:28:44.660 --> 01:28:47.660]  but they were getting more and more aggressive.
[01:28:47.660 --> 01:28:54.660]  And of course, I was going to jail for failure to ID, you know, and I kept telling them,
[01:28:54.660 --> 01:29:00.660]  guys, you can't take me to jail for failure to ID unless I've already been lawfully arrested
[01:29:00.660 --> 01:29:04.660]  for something else and they didn't want to hear it.
[01:29:04.660 --> 01:29:11.660]  And so I finally just said, look, guys, I know I'm in a custodial arrest.
[01:29:11.660 --> 01:29:18.660]  And I invoke my fundamental protective right and said, you know, I have no problem identifying
[01:29:18.660 --> 01:29:22.660]  myself to you, but I don't have to give you the piece of plastic to do it.
[01:29:22.660 --> 01:29:25.660]  And the sergeant said, well, you know, you're right.
[01:29:25.660 --> 01:29:26.660]  You don't.
[01:29:26.660 --> 01:29:28.660]  And I said, you have something to write with.
[01:29:28.660 --> 01:29:35.660]  And the deputy that pulled me over said, yeah, and I waited for him to get a pad out and let him go.
[01:29:35.660 --> 01:29:38.660]  But, you know, they let me go, thankfully.
[01:29:38.660 --> 01:29:39.660]  I didn't go to jail.
[01:29:39.660 --> 01:29:41.660]  But anyway, that's all I got.
[01:29:41.660 --> 01:29:44.660]  I don't want to hold you up to get somebody else on the line.
[01:29:44.660 --> 01:29:45.660]  Okay.
[01:29:45.660 --> 01:29:46.660]  Well, thanks for calling in, James.
[01:29:46.660 --> 01:29:48.660]  And I'll get back with you on that motion.
[01:29:48.660 --> 01:29:49.660]  Okay.
[01:29:49.660 --> 01:29:50.660]  Yes, sir.
[01:29:50.660 --> 01:29:51.660]  All right.
[01:29:51.660 --> 01:29:52.660]  Well, you have a good night.
[01:29:52.660 --> 01:29:53.660]  Thanks for calling.
[01:29:53.660 --> 01:29:54.660]  All right, folks.
[01:29:54.660 --> 01:29:55.660]  We'll be right back after this break.
[01:29:55.660 --> 01:29:57.660]  So y'all hang in there.
[01:29:57.660 --> 01:30:04.660]  Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.
[01:30:04.660 --> 01:30:06.660]  Whoever came up with that was sure wrong.
[01:30:06.660 --> 01:30:10.660]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albert, and I'll be back in a moment to explain how your first middle
[01:30:10.660 --> 01:30:13.660]  and last names can actually affect your mortality.
[01:30:13.660 --> 01:30:19.660]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database
[01:30:19.660 --> 01:30:21.660]  of your personal information.
[01:30:21.660 --> 01:30:22.660]  That's creepy.
[01:30:22.660 --> 01:30:24.660]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:24.660 --> 01:30:27.660]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:27.660 --> 01:30:32.660]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies
[01:30:32.660 --> 01:30:33.660]  and their third party certified.
[01:30:33.660 --> 01:30:38.660]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:38.660 --> 01:30:41.660]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:41.660 --> 01:30:44.660]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:44.660 --> 01:30:48.660]  The initials of your name could significantly impact how long you live.
[01:30:48.660 --> 01:30:54.660]  According to a University of California study, positive initials like VIP or ACE could add
[01:30:54.660 --> 01:30:57.660]  more than four years to a man's life.
[01:30:57.660 --> 01:31:02.660]  Negative initials like PIG or DIE could shorten a man's life by two years.
[01:31:02.660 --> 01:31:05.660]  While women are less impacted by negative initials than men,
[01:31:05.660 --> 01:31:08.660]  positive initials can add three years to their lives.
[01:31:08.660 --> 01:31:12.660]  Researchers believe initials are powerful symbols that affect how people are treated
[01:31:12.660 --> 01:31:15.660]  and how they feel about themselves, and research supports it.
[01:31:15.660 --> 01:31:20.660]  Those with negative initials were more likely to commit suicide and die in accidents
[01:31:20.660 --> 01:31:23.660]  than those with positive initials, so name your kids well.
[01:31:23.660 --> 01:31:25.660]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:25.660 --> 01:31:28.660]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.660 --> 01:31:31.660]  I lost my son.
[01:31:31.660 --> 01:31:32.660]  My uncle.
[01:31:32.660 --> 01:31:33.660]  My uncle.
[01:31:33.660 --> 01:31:34.660]  My uncle.
[01:31:34.660 --> 01:31:35.660]  On September 11th, 2000.
[01:31:35.660 --> 01:31:38.660]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[01:31:38.660 --> 01:31:41.660]  World Trade Center 7, a 47 story skyscraper,
[01:31:41.660 --> 01:31:42.660]  was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:42.660 --> 01:31:46.660]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down buildings 7.
[01:31:46.660 --> 01:31:48.660]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers
[01:31:48.660 --> 01:31:52.660]  have looked into the evidence and believed there was more to the story.
[01:31:56.660 --> 01:31:57.660]  Go to www.buildingwhat.org
[01:31:57.660 --> 01:32:00.660]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:00.660 --> 01:32:03.060]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.060 --> 01:32:06.020]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.020 --> 01:32:09.060]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chem trails,
[01:32:09.060 --> 01:32:10.740]  but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:10.740 --> 01:32:12.820]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chem trails,
[01:32:12.820 --> 01:32:14.180]  but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.180 --> 01:32:15.700]  That's why you have insurance,
[01:32:15.700 --> 01:32:18.500]  and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you
[01:32:18.500 --> 01:32:20.820]  with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:20.820 --> 01:32:23.860]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member
[01:32:23.860 --> 01:32:26.420]  of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.420 --> 01:32:28.420]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:32:28.420 --> 01:32:31.780]  to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.780 --> 01:32:38.180]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com,
[01:32:38.180 --> 01:32:40.500]  mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:40.500 --> 01:32:43.540]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network
[01:32:43.540 --> 01:32:45.140]  to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.140 --> 01:32:47.940]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking,
[01:32:47.940 --> 01:32:50.100]  your door should be locked in.
[01:32:50.100 --> 01:32:56.260]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.260 --> 01:32:58.500]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.500 --> 01:33:28.340]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chem trails.
[01:33:28.500 --> 01:33:44.820]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:44.820 --> 01:33:46.580]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:46.580 --> 01:33:50.740]  The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:33:50.740 --> 01:33:51.940]  If you want to call us again in line,
[01:33:51.940 --> 01:33:53.460]  we've got a half an hour left in the show,
[01:33:53.460 --> 01:33:56.500]  and I will try to get to everybody I can on the caller board.
[01:33:56.500 --> 01:33:58.980]  Right now, we have Ramadan in Arizona.
[01:33:58.980 --> 01:34:00.340]  Ramadan, what can we do for you?
[01:34:03.940 --> 01:34:04.820]  Hello, Ramadan.
[01:34:06.340 --> 01:34:07.060]  Yeah, I'm here.
[01:34:07.060 --> 01:34:07.860]  How are you?
[01:34:07.860 --> 01:34:08.500]  All right, and you?
[01:34:10.260 --> 01:34:10.740]  That's great.
[01:34:10.740 --> 01:34:11.300]  That's great.
[01:34:11.940 --> 01:34:21.860]  I actually wanted to get some advice about what to do about a judge,
[01:34:22.500 --> 01:34:25.300]  the initial trial court judge that I had the case on
[01:34:25.300 --> 01:34:26.580]  in the Arizona Supreme Court.
[01:34:27.780 --> 01:34:29.380]  In the Arizona Supreme Court?
[01:34:30.820 --> 01:34:31.380]  Yeah.
[01:34:31.380 --> 01:34:32.020]  Okay.
[01:34:32.020 --> 01:34:35.140]  Yeah, because I have filed a petition for review now,
[01:34:35.140 --> 01:34:39.700]  but the trial court judge, I know he did something illegal.
[01:34:40.580 --> 01:34:42.820]  Well, actually quite a few things on every level,
[01:34:43.700 --> 01:34:46.740]  and I actually tried to judicial conduct complaint him,
[01:34:47.620 --> 01:34:53.780]  but I did not know that he was a judge pro temp that was here in the case.
[01:34:53.780 --> 01:34:55.460]  What does that have to do with anything?
[01:34:56.420 --> 01:34:58.260]  He was acting in a judicial capacity,
[01:34:58.260 --> 01:35:00.980]  it can bring him from doing so again if they took the complaint.
[01:35:03.540 --> 01:35:10.260]  Well, the commission says that they can't take some complaints about judge pro temp,
[01:35:10.980 --> 01:35:11.860]  or at least he doesn't.
[01:35:11.860 --> 01:35:12.340]  They don't.
[01:35:12.900 --> 01:35:14.100]  Then follow bar grievance.
[01:35:15.860 --> 01:35:17.460]  Okay, a bar grievance.
[01:35:17.460 --> 01:35:20.020]  Most likely the pro temp judge was an attorney, right?
[01:35:20.020 --> 01:35:23.940]  So first, yeah, because I was trying to find the,
[01:35:23.940 --> 01:35:27.140]  I didn't know until actually the commission has sent it back.
[01:35:27.140 --> 01:35:30.660]  It says that we, they set something around the notion.
[01:35:32.100 --> 01:35:34.100]  They started with the title of a judge pro temp,
[01:35:34.100 --> 01:35:36.420]  and I was like, oh, I didn't know he was one of those.
[01:35:37.140 --> 01:35:43.060]  And eventually, I guess they didn't do anything basically.
[01:35:43.860 --> 01:35:45.460]  For that fact, they were the judge pro temp,
[01:35:45.460 --> 01:35:50.500]  because they don't, they're not under, they're not subjugated to the commission.
[01:35:50.500 --> 01:35:54.580]  So bar grievance, anything else I can do?
[01:35:54.580 --> 01:35:55.940]  Because here's what happened, Eddie.
[01:35:56.580 --> 01:36:00.820]  When I had trial all the whole while, when I filed motions,
[01:36:01.620 --> 01:36:04.340]  it was seen by the presiding judge.
[01:36:04.980 --> 01:36:09.620]  I had the presiding judge all the way up until the day of trial,
[01:36:09.620 --> 01:36:12.260]  and the day of trial, the judge switched.
[01:36:12.260 --> 01:36:13.460]  They switched the judge out.
[01:36:13.460 --> 01:36:19.540]  And I'm getting, because I went to the court reporter before the judge showed up,
[01:36:19.540 --> 01:36:22.340]  and I said, and I saw his name there, and I said,
[01:36:22.340 --> 01:36:24.900]  Judge, I'll cover up his hearing the case.
[01:36:24.900 --> 01:36:27.220]  He said, no, he can't make it today.
[01:36:27.220 --> 01:36:37.140]  And I was like, okay, well, so can they change the judges just like on the whim like that?
[01:36:37.140 --> 01:36:40.900]  Well, technically, they would have to have a good reason for doing it,
[01:36:40.900 --> 01:36:44.660]  such as an emergency or something of that nature that would prevent the judge
[01:36:44.660 --> 01:36:46.900]  from being there to fulfill his official duties.
[01:36:47.860 --> 01:36:50.900]  But they're not supposed to switch on you unless that's the case.
[01:36:51.540 --> 01:36:58.100]  Now, as far as the things this judge did wrong, what are you saying he did wrong?
[01:36:59.860 --> 01:37:03.860]  Well, basically, you just ignored every single word I said in my closing argument
[01:37:03.860 --> 01:37:05.060]  about the beach house.
[01:37:05.060 --> 01:37:06.260]  And I specifically said that.
[01:37:06.260 --> 01:37:08.660]  Wait, wait, wait, you turned away from your phone.
[01:37:08.660 --> 01:37:10.900]  You've gotten real dull sounding.
[01:37:10.900 --> 01:37:12.740]  Everything in your closing argument about what?
[01:37:14.020 --> 01:37:14.660]  I'm sorry.
[01:37:14.660 --> 01:37:15.540]  Can you hear me now?
[01:37:15.540 --> 01:37:16.020]  Yeah.
[01:37:17.140 --> 01:37:17.620]  Okay.
[01:37:19.620 --> 01:37:24.820]  Everything in the closing argument that I mentioned about the detail matters being required.
[01:37:24.820 --> 01:37:25.460]  Right.
[01:37:25.460 --> 01:37:30.420]  And he didn't mention anything in the under.
[01:37:30.420 --> 01:37:32.260]  He gave an under advisement ruling.
[01:37:32.260 --> 01:37:38.500]  And all he mentioned was the prosecution side of what the prosecution said.
[01:37:38.500 --> 01:37:44.500]  Because the prosecution argued that, well, if decal matters are a subject and 75% of
[01:37:44.500 --> 01:37:48.820]  our DUI cases would have to be overturned, I don't really think we've ever had
[01:37:48.820 --> 01:37:50.820]  an issue with decal matters.
[01:37:50.820 --> 01:37:55.380]  And I'm just like, well, I believe they need to be overturned, too.
[01:37:55.380 --> 01:38:00.660]  But no, he didn't mention anything on my side, nothing, not a single word.
[01:38:00.660 --> 01:38:06.020]  He just took whatever, he just regurgitated about whatever the prosecution had bent to.
[01:38:06.020 --> 01:38:06.660]  Right.
[01:38:06.660 --> 01:38:08.660]  What you should have said was objection.
[01:38:08.660 --> 01:38:14.660]  The court is not bound to what may or may not be the result of offering a proper opinion
[01:38:14.660 --> 01:38:21.140]  consistent with law to suit the needs of the prosecution to maintain its conviction rate.
[01:38:21.140 --> 01:38:23.300]  It's rebound by the law.
[01:38:23.300 --> 01:38:26.420]  The law says that this is a requirement.
[01:38:26.420 --> 01:38:28.420]  That sounds good.
[01:38:28.420 --> 01:38:30.420]  Actually, it sounds good.
[01:38:30.420 --> 01:38:32.420]  I like what it sounds.
[01:38:32.420 --> 01:38:34.420]  Okay, that's good stuff.
[01:38:34.420 --> 01:38:36.420]  Yeah, but should I set that during the trial?
[01:38:36.420 --> 01:38:40.420]  Because you didn't get the decision right there.
[01:38:40.420 --> 01:38:46.420]  He waited until the next day and gave an under advisement ruling when only me and actually another...
[01:38:46.420 --> 01:38:50.420]  Well, does Arizona require you to file a motion for new trial before the appeal?
[01:38:52.420 --> 01:38:54.420]  No, I didn't have to file a motion.
[01:38:54.420 --> 01:38:57.460]  No, I didn't have to follow a motion for new trial.
[01:38:57.460 --> 01:39:00.420]  Okay, did you file for findings of facts and conclusions of law?
[01:39:00.420 --> 01:39:03.940]  Is that what he provided in his ruling?
[01:39:03.940 --> 01:39:07.540]  I didn't know about that since death of the time, so I did not follow that.
[01:39:07.540 --> 01:39:08.980]  Well, you don't file it.
[01:39:08.980 --> 01:39:14.980]  You file a motion demanding they file it because they're the one that's making the opinion, not you.
[01:39:18.020 --> 01:39:22.580]  So you want the judge to tell you through a finding of facts and conclusions of law
[01:39:22.580 --> 01:39:26.580]  what legal basis he is using to make his ruling?
[01:39:30.580 --> 01:39:34.580]  You don't ever make a finding of facts and conclusions of law.
[01:39:34.580 --> 01:39:36.580]  You have no authority to make one.
[01:39:39.580 --> 01:39:45.580]  So all I do is motion that the court makes a finding of facts and conclusions along the trial.
[01:39:45.580 --> 01:39:47.580]  Based upon its ruling, yes.
[01:39:47.580 --> 01:39:49.580]  Based upon its ruling, okay.
[01:39:49.580 --> 01:39:50.580]  Good to know.
[01:39:50.580 --> 01:39:52.580]  Well, I know that for next time.
[01:39:52.580 --> 01:39:54.580]  I didn't know that this time.
[01:39:54.580 --> 01:40:02.580]  I actually filed a motion, but the thing was I didn't know the right words, and I had thought it as...
[01:40:02.580 --> 01:40:04.580]  It should have been lawful authority.
[01:40:04.580 --> 01:40:11.580]  I was motion to dismiss the law, lack of jurisdiction, but I should have put a lack of authority
[01:40:11.580 --> 01:40:13.580]  because I didn't know the terminology at the time.
[01:40:13.580 --> 01:40:16.580]  I knew what that wasn't right, but I couldn't think about it for weeks,
[01:40:16.580 --> 01:40:19.580]  and then I just filed the motion because the deadline was coming up.
[01:40:19.580 --> 01:40:25.580]  But in the body of the motion, I stated everything that actually needed to be...
[01:40:25.580 --> 01:40:30.580]  What gave him reason about the subject matter or about the decals?
[01:40:30.580 --> 01:40:32.580]  And then at the end, I could...
[01:40:32.580 --> 01:40:39.580]  No, this case should be dismissed because the officer was acting without jurisdiction,
[01:40:39.580 --> 01:40:43.580]  and it should have been lawful authority, but it was concerning...
[01:40:43.580 --> 01:40:50.580]  It should have been the officer was acting unlawfully in his official capacity under color of law
[01:40:50.580 --> 01:40:54.580]  to do that which the law specifically prohibits.
[01:40:54.580 --> 01:40:56.580]  Right.
[01:40:56.580 --> 01:40:59.580]  This case is...
[01:40:59.580 --> 01:41:02.580]  It might be interesting if it actually goes somewhere,
[01:41:02.580 --> 01:41:07.580]  but I just wanted to know exactly what I can do to this judge
[01:41:07.580 --> 01:41:09.580]  because I want to do some more than...
[01:41:09.580 --> 01:41:15.580]  Unless you can prove that he ignored the law to rule the way he ruled
[01:41:15.580 --> 01:41:19.580]  or did it because he was prejudicial to you,
[01:41:19.580 --> 01:41:25.580]  something that can show that his ruling deserves to be overturned, it's not going to matter.
[01:41:25.580 --> 01:41:31.580]  So you've got to have something to back up what it is you're going after and why.
[01:41:31.580 --> 01:41:33.580]  Do you have anything?
[01:41:33.580 --> 01:41:38.580]  Can you show documentation-wise, by his words and his ruling-wise,
[01:41:38.580 --> 01:41:46.580]  that he intentionally ignored the law to get an outcome inconsistent with that law?
[01:41:46.580 --> 01:41:50.580]  Well, maybe so.
[01:41:50.580 --> 01:41:54.580]  It's only but not specific documentation.
[01:41:54.580 --> 01:41:56.580]  Only the transcript.
[01:41:56.580 --> 01:41:58.580]  Wait a minute.
[01:41:58.580 --> 01:42:00.580]  You said he filed an opinion, right?
[01:42:00.580 --> 01:42:01.580]  A ruling.
[01:42:01.580 --> 01:42:04.580]  Yeah, under-advisement ruling.
[01:42:04.580 --> 01:42:08.580]  Where he described why he was ruling, right?
[01:42:08.580 --> 01:42:09.580]  Correct.
[01:42:09.580 --> 01:42:10.580]  Okay.
[01:42:10.580 --> 01:42:17.580]  In that description, he based his ruling on what the prosecution told him about overturned convictions, right?
[01:42:17.580 --> 01:42:19.580]  Nothing more than that.
[01:42:19.580 --> 01:42:20.580]  Okay.
[01:42:20.580 --> 01:42:26.580]  So what the judge is attempting to do is to justify illegal convictions
[01:42:26.580 --> 01:42:30.580]  that were gotten in violation of law
[01:42:30.580 --> 01:42:35.580]  making the excuse that those convictions might be overturned and have to be redone
[01:42:35.580 --> 01:42:39.580]  if he rules correctly and consistently with the law.
[01:42:39.580 --> 01:42:42.580]  That's not a valid reason not to do so.
[01:42:42.580 --> 01:42:48.580]  Protecting the state status quo is not a valid reason for the judge to rule
[01:42:48.580 --> 01:42:52.580]  against the clear mandate of the law.
[01:42:52.580 --> 01:42:55.580]  He didn't mention that specifically in the under-advisement ruling,
[01:42:55.580 --> 01:43:00.580]  but that is what the prosecution said during his closing argument.
[01:43:00.580 --> 01:43:06.580]  And I guess it was just one of the prosecution little words or buzz phrases
[01:43:06.580 --> 01:43:09.580]  that he put in the judge's ear to say, hey, you know what, don't let this go anywhere
[01:43:09.580 --> 01:43:12.580]  because this could strike, you know, un...
[01:43:12.580 --> 01:43:19.580]  Then you still need to argue that that's what he did when you filed your appeal.
[01:43:19.580 --> 01:43:22.580]  If you filed an appeal.
[01:43:22.580 --> 01:43:23.580]  Actually, yeah.
[01:43:23.580 --> 01:43:27.580]  Yeah, I did. I've done two or three appeals to the Superior Court.
[01:43:27.580 --> 01:43:28.580]  For this case?
[01:43:28.580 --> 01:43:29.580]  I think that...
[01:43:29.580 --> 01:43:30.580]  Oh, yeah.
[01:43:30.580 --> 01:43:31.580]  Okay.
[01:43:31.580 --> 01:43:39.580]  Because this case, I just recently filed the petition for review to the Arizona Supreme Court.
[01:43:39.580 --> 01:43:42.580]  And I'm waiting on the other side to respond.
[01:43:42.580 --> 01:43:43.580]  Okay.
[01:43:43.580 --> 01:43:44.580]  Well, I wish you luck with that.
[01:43:44.580 --> 01:43:46.580]  But yeah, what you're going to go out to the judge for,
[01:43:46.580 --> 01:43:51.580]  you've got to have something to back it up and show that he acted contrary to law.
[01:43:51.580 --> 01:43:54.580]  Hang on just a second, we'll finish this up on the other side, okay?
[01:43:54.580 --> 01:43:55.580]  We'll be right back, folks.
[01:43:55.580 --> 01:44:24.580]  Y'all hang in there.
[01:44:25.580 --> 01:44:54.580]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:55.580 --> 01:45:23.580]  We'll be right back.
[01:45:23.580 --> 01:45:52.580]  We'll be right back.
[01:45:53.580 --> 01:46:21.580]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:21.580 --> 01:46:25.580]  We are also in the last segment of this show for this Monday night.
[01:46:25.580 --> 01:46:28.580]  Right now we are talking to Ramadan in Arizona.
[01:46:28.580 --> 01:46:38.580]  All right, Ramadan.
[01:46:38.580 --> 01:46:42.580]  You're mumbling into your phone again, man.
[01:46:42.580 --> 01:46:43.580]  There we go.
[01:46:43.580 --> 01:46:45.580]  I'm holding it on my shoulder.
[01:46:45.580 --> 01:46:46.580]  Holding it on my shoulder.
[01:46:46.580 --> 01:46:50.580]  You must have a very deep shoulder.
[01:46:50.580 --> 01:46:53.580]  Yeah, I'm like, it's not a blot.
[01:46:53.580 --> 01:46:55.580]  I'm like, it's been my neck over.
[01:46:55.580 --> 01:47:02.580]  I'm holding it on my shoulder to pinch the phone.
[01:47:02.580 --> 01:47:04.580]  Yeah, I just wanted to know how to go out to judge.
[01:47:04.580 --> 01:47:06.580]  Because I really want to make him pay.
[01:47:06.580 --> 01:47:09.580]  Because I'm like, no, that's not the way you're just going to do things.
[01:47:09.580 --> 01:47:10.580]  You're just going to let it slide.
[01:47:10.580 --> 01:47:19.580]  Because I can tell that once I was in trial and then I asked the prosecutor,
[01:47:19.580 --> 01:47:27.580]  not the prosecutor, but I asked the cop that testified that he had lawful authority
[01:47:27.580 --> 01:47:32.580]  to drive a car that a legal unmarked vehicle, the prosecution objected
[01:47:32.580 --> 01:47:34.580]  and he said legal relevance.
[01:47:34.580 --> 01:47:36.580]  The judge asked me what's the legal relevance.
[01:47:36.580 --> 01:47:40.580]  I said, well, I said we're here in the statute.
[01:47:40.580 --> 01:47:46.580]  So 38-538 is based on all political subdivisions.
[01:47:46.580 --> 01:47:51.580]  Lawful vehicles need to be issued with a designation on a vehicle.
[01:47:51.580 --> 01:47:53.580]  Well, let me put a bug in your ear.
[01:47:53.580 --> 01:47:56.580]  The next time they're asking for legal relevance,
[01:47:56.580 --> 01:47:59.580]  the legal relevance for the question you asked is this.
[01:47:59.580 --> 01:48:05.580]  I am asking the officer if it is okay for him to commit a greater crime
[01:48:05.580 --> 01:48:12.580]  in order to act under color of law to apprehend someone else to accuse them of a crime.
[01:48:12.580 --> 01:48:16.580]  That's a good way to put it.
[01:48:16.580 --> 01:48:21.580]  You always know what to say.
[01:48:21.580 --> 01:48:23.580]  It's lots of practice, man.
[01:48:23.580 --> 01:48:25.580]  It's like arguing with New Yorkers.
[01:48:25.580 --> 01:48:30.580]  You want to learn how to argue on your feet and immediately argue with a New Yorker.
[01:48:30.580 --> 01:48:33.580]  Oh, man.
[01:48:33.580 --> 01:48:34.580]  Yes.
[01:48:34.580 --> 01:48:39.580]  You may as well be playing racquetball from three feet away from the wall.
[01:48:39.580 --> 01:48:44.580]  Yeah, you need good reflexes for that.
[01:48:44.580 --> 01:48:47.580]  You better have grand reflexes you're doing that stuff.
[01:48:47.580 --> 01:48:50.580]  I guarantee you.
[01:48:50.580 --> 01:48:56.580]  You better make the flag look like a geriatric.
[01:48:56.580 --> 01:49:00.580]  Yeah, I've been on the case for about a year.
[01:49:00.580 --> 01:49:02.580]  I appealed this three times.
[01:49:02.580 --> 01:49:08.580]  I think that judicial conduct complaints for that county court judge,
[01:49:08.580 --> 01:49:11.580]  I think that's going to stick because it's taken a while actually.
[01:49:11.580 --> 01:49:13.580]  It's taken way longer than the first one.
[01:49:13.580 --> 01:49:17.580]  And because she just interpreted the way she wanted to,
[01:49:17.580 --> 01:49:19.580]  and I was like, oh, I see what you're doing.
[01:49:19.580 --> 01:49:22.580]  Yeah, judicial conduct complaints for years.
[01:49:22.580 --> 01:49:26.580]  And then many of those court of appeals staff attorneys,
[01:49:26.580 --> 01:49:31.580]  they got to appeal, dismiss it, motion for reconsideration,
[01:49:31.580 --> 01:49:34.580]  and denied it without even a single legal rebuttal.
[01:49:34.580 --> 01:49:38.580]  Okay, oh, they really don't want to touch this.
[01:49:38.580 --> 01:49:42.580]  I'm going to make it to the point where anybody who touches this case
[01:49:42.580 --> 01:49:45.580]  and don't follow it within the black letter of the law,
[01:49:45.580 --> 01:49:48.580]  make them pay for some way, somehow.
[01:49:48.580 --> 01:49:54.580]  Because I can see what I'm now realizing is the grand precedent
[01:49:54.580 --> 01:49:57.580]  that actually can be set in the state.
[01:49:57.580 --> 01:50:02.580]  Correct me if I'm wrong, but what they have to overturn,
[01:50:02.580 --> 01:50:06.580]  a lot of cases or all the cases that was actually involving
[01:50:06.580 --> 01:50:12.580]  a unmarked car in a truck of enforcement, is it possible?
[01:50:12.580 --> 01:50:15.580]  Officer, are you authorized to commit illegal acts
[01:50:15.580 --> 01:50:20.580]  in the performance of your legal duties?
[01:50:20.580 --> 01:50:24.580]  Are you actually authorized to perpetrate criminal acts upon the public
[01:50:24.580 --> 01:50:29.580]  in order to then accuse the public of lesser crimes?
[01:50:29.580 --> 01:50:32.580]  Okay, let's see how that sounds.
[01:50:32.580 --> 01:50:33.580]  No.
[01:50:33.580 --> 01:50:34.580]  Yeah, this ain't going to...
[01:50:34.580 --> 01:50:37.580]  See, you don't have to do anything but give him to tell you
[01:50:37.580 --> 01:50:40.580]  why he's acting illegally and there's ways to disguise the question
[01:50:40.580 --> 01:50:42.580]  to make it appear just like that.
[01:50:42.580 --> 01:50:45.580]  If they jump to say objection, prejudicial.
[01:50:45.580 --> 01:50:48.580]  Excuse me, Judge, I am simply stating the facts of the matter.
[01:50:48.580 --> 01:50:50.580]  I can't help it that it's the truth
[01:50:50.580 --> 01:50:55.580]  and injures the credibility of the witness.
[01:50:55.580 --> 01:50:59.580]  Yeah, it's true.
[01:50:59.580 --> 01:51:03.580]  Now, do you intend to allow the prosecution to cover up the real facts
[01:51:03.580 --> 01:51:08.580]  of this case and thus I'm going to demand a mistrial when you do
[01:51:08.580 --> 01:51:14.580]  or can I proceed?
[01:51:14.580 --> 01:51:17.580]  Yeah, I noticed that the trial court is so quirky
[01:51:17.580 --> 01:51:19.580]  like you've got to be on the punch
[01:51:19.580 --> 01:51:21.580]  and a lot of things I was unprepared for
[01:51:21.580 --> 01:51:24.580]  but I had enough to make my appeal
[01:51:24.580 --> 01:51:28.580]  to get that subject matter into the record.
[01:51:28.580 --> 01:51:31.580]  But yeah, the trial court is just really, really tricky.
[01:51:31.580 --> 01:51:37.580]  I remember you saying in one of your archives years ago that...
[01:51:37.580 --> 01:51:39.580]  You got to know how to operate like they said
[01:51:39.580 --> 01:51:43.580]  those are very few amount of attorneys that were able to just actually
[01:51:43.580 --> 01:51:47.580]  rub but instantaneously for just about anything.
[01:51:47.580 --> 01:51:52.580]  Yeah, there's only a handful of good trial attorneys in the country.
[01:51:52.580 --> 01:51:55.580]  A trial attorney is one who can think on his feet,
[01:51:55.580 --> 01:51:58.580]  formulate a response in an instant,
[01:51:58.580 --> 01:52:04.580]  and always make it relevant and factual and literate.
[01:52:04.580 --> 01:52:10.580]  Yeah, before the trial I actually sat in the court
[01:52:10.580 --> 01:52:13.580]  and I watched a lot of things conduct itself
[01:52:13.580 --> 01:52:16.580]  and I just seemed like at first it just looked like a big ring.
[01:52:16.580 --> 01:52:19.580]  It was just like a ring of, you know, give me your money,
[01:52:19.580 --> 01:52:22.580]  buy, give me your money, buy.
[01:52:22.580 --> 01:52:24.580]  It kind of was just like that.
[01:52:24.580 --> 01:52:27.580]  I was like, yeah, you watched that enough just for an hour
[01:52:27.580 --> 01:52:30.580]  and it's like you pick up really quickly.
[01:52:30.580 --> 01:52:32.580]  Man, this is just a ring.
[01:52:32.580 --> 01:52:35.580]  It's just basically an enterprise of just, you know,
[01:52:35.580 --> 01:52:37.580]  basically coursing your money over and stuff.
[01:52:37.580 --> 01:52:40.580]  You got a man, an armed man that pulled you over
[01:52:40.580 --> 01:52:42.580]  and stated you endangered the public
[01:52:42.580 --> 01:52:45.580]  by committing this traffic violation.
[01:52:45.580 --> 01:52:49.580]  That's like $120, $150, $240, what have you.
[01:52:49.580 --> 01:52:51.580]  And then you have to just pay that
[01:52:51.580 --> 01:52:53.580]  because they say you're endangered the public
[01:52:53.580 --> 01:52:55.580]  but they can never really prove it.
[01:52:55.580 --> 01:52:59.580]  I mean, yeah, they got a ring going on there.
[01:52:59.580 --> 01:53:01.580]  And then I actually looked up the other statistics
[01:53:01.580 --> 01:53:03.580]  of traffic enforcement.
[01:53:03.580 --> 01:53:06.580]  I mean, a transportation code,
[01:53:06.580 --> 01:53:08.580]  if they didn't have the citations,
[01:53:08.580 --> 01:53:10.580]  the transportation code and clicking on everybody,
[01:53:10.580 --> 01:53:13.580]  they would be in the hole.
[01:53:13.580 --> 01:53:15.580]  They would not make as much money.
[01:53:15.580 --> 01:53:17.580]  That's actually more than criminal cases I saw.
[01:53:17.580 --> 01:53:19.580]  I saw it out.
[01:53:19.580 --> 01:53:22.580]  In Arizona, it was like over 60%.
[01:53:22.580 --> 01:53:25.580]  And the rest were just like mainly criminal,
[01:53:25.580 --> 01:53:27.580]  maybe some tax stuff too,
[01:53:27.580 --> 01:53:29.580]  but mainly it was just consultation.
[01:53:29.580 --> 01:53:32.580]  I'm like, if they didn't have this,
[01:53:32.580 --> 01:53:36.580]  they wouldn't have these nice looking courtrooms that they have.
[01:53:36.580 --> 01:53:38.580]  Yep.
[01:53:38.580 --> 01:53:41.580]  Well, that's what...
[01:53:41.580 --> 01:53:45.580]  Once again, if you can prove he did something wrong,
[01:53:45.580 --> 01:53:47.580]  that would require that, then yeah,
[01:53:47.580 --> 01:53:49.580]  but you've got to be able to prove it.
[01:53:49.580 --> 01:53:51.580]  Just saying it's not going to do it.
[01:53:51.580 --> 01:53:53.580]  Of course.
[01:53:53.580 --> 01:53:55.580]  Okay.
[01:53:55.580 --> 01:53:57.580]  Okay.
[01:53:57.580 --> 01:53:59.580]  Thank you, Eddie. I appreciate it.
[01:53:59.580 --> 01:54:01.580]  You're welcome.
[01:54:01.580 --> 01:54:03.580]  You have a good night. Thanks for going in.
[01:54:03.580 --> 01:54:05.580]  Take care.
[01:54:05.580 --> 01:54:07.580]  You too.
[01:54:07.580 --> 01:54:09.580]  Thank you.
[01:54:09.580 --> 01:54:11.580]  Take care.
[01:54:11.580 --> 01:54:13.580]  You too.
[01:54:13.580 --> 01:54:18.580]  All right. Now, we've got four and a half minutes of which I have three.
[01:54:18.580 --> 01:54:21.580]  John of New York, what can we do for you?
[01:54:21.580 --> 01:54:24.580]  Hi, Randy. Hi, Eddie. How are you doing?
[01:54:24.580 --> 01:54:26.580]  I'm doing good.
[01:54:26.580 --> 01:54:30.580]  Okay. In 2007 and 2008,
[01:54:30.580 --> 01:54:33.580]  I cashed in my IRAs early.
[01:54:33.580 --> 01:54:37.580]  So I incurred penalty fees that I could not pay.
[01:54:37.580 --> 01:54:40.580]  And I discussed it with the state of New York and I said,
[01:54:40.580 --> 01:54:44.580]  I make X number of dollars a month and that's all I make.
[01:54:44.580 --> 01:54:47.580]  And they declared me to be uncollectable.
[01:54:47.580 --> 01:54:51.580]  And they said, check in with us every year, whatever it is,
[01:54:51.580 --> 01:54:54.580]  and we'll see what your status is.
[01:54:54.580 --> 01:54:59.580]  Well, I checked in again, like I always do once or twice a year.
[01:54:59.580 --> 01:55:02.580]  And within the last three or four months,
[01:55:02.580 --> 01:55:07.580]  all of a sudden recently they gave my account to a bill collector
[01:55:07.580 --> 01:55:14.580]  and suddenly a bill collector is going to make my status collectible.
[01:55:14.580 --> 01:55:16.580]  I don't think so.
[01:55:16.580 --> 01:55:21.580]  Now, I make so little money, there is no money that I can take.
[01:55:21.580 --> 01:55:26.580]  If I pay this bill, even if it's on time payment,
[01:55:26.580 --> 01:55:30.580]  I will have to stop eating and or eating.
[01:55:30.580 --> 01:55:32.580]  Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
[01:55:32.580 --> 01:55:36.580]  Start there and go from there.
[01:55:36.580 --> 01:55:38.580]  Well, now what do you say that again?
[01:55:38.580 --> 01:55:41.580]  Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
[01:55:41.580 --> 01:55:46.580]  I used to be a debt collector, so tell me.
[01:55:46.580 --> 01:55:50.580]  Federal law called the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
[01:55:50.580 --> 01:55:54.580]  You need to see if this debt collector has violated any of the rules
[01:55:54.580 --> 01:55:57.580]  or procedures that are required by the FDCPA.
[01:55:57.580 --> 01:56:02.580]  Because every time they do, it's a violation with a fine.
[01:56:02.580 --> 01:56:07.580]  Those fines can amount up to $5,000 per instance.
[01:56:07.580 --> 01:56:10.580]  I know. I already checked the letter that they sent me.
[01:56:10.580 --> 01:56:12.580]  It seems to be okay.
[01:56:12.580 --> 01:56:14.580]  I used to be a debt collector, so I know the law.
[01:56:14.580 --> 01:56:15.580]  Okay.
[01:56:15.580 --> 01:56:18.580]  Well, then what are you asking me about?
[01:56:18.580 --> 01:56:22.580]  Well, there's got to be something somewhere.
[01:56:22.580 --> 01:56:25.580]  Tell me if I'm getting this right.
[01:56:25.580 --> 01:56:29.580]  I seem to remember something about writing to a debt collector
[01:56:29.580 --> 01:56:34.580]  in writing that I didn't enter into a contract with the debt collector,
[01:56:34.580 --> 01:56:40.580]  and I don't recognize his authority simply because he doesn't have any authority.
[01:56:40.580 --> 01:56:45.580]  Well, again, that's one of those patronage theories that if...
[01:56:45.580 --> 01:56:47.580]  Here's the deal, okay?
[01:56:47.580 --> 01:56:51.580]  First off, as a debt collector, you should know how this works,
[01:56:51.580 --> 01:56:54.580]  and you know that that's not going to work.
[01:56:54.580 --> 01:56:57.580]  When someone sells off a debt to a debt collector,
[01:56:57.580 --> 01:56:59.580]  it's not given to the debt collector.
[01:56:59.580 --> 01:57:05.580]  It's written off and sold, and they also claim it as a loss on their taxes.
[01:57:05.580 --> 01:57:07.580]  Yes or no?
[01:57:07.580 --> 01:57:08.580]  Well, yeah, they do.
[01:57:08.580 --> 01:57:10.580]  Now, how about the federal government?
[01:57:10.580 --> 01:57:11.580]  Okay.
[01:57:11.580 --> 01:57:13.580]  Wait a minute. Let me finish.
[01:57:13.580 --> 01:57:14.580]  All right.
[01:57:14.580 --> 01:57:18.580]  How, then, does the company have a claim of a debt when they were paid for it,
[01:57:18.580 --> 01:57:23.580]  even if not from the original source?
[01:57:23.580 --> 01:57:24.580]  So what do you mean?
[01:57:24.580 --> 01:57:27.580]  This is the state of New York, not a...
[01:57:27.580 --> 01:57:29.580]  Well, it still doesn't make any difference.
[01:57:29.580 --> 01:57:36.580]  The federal courts have ruled that a state collection agency is still subject to the FDCPA and the requirements.
[01:57:36.580 --> 01:57:39.580]  But the simple fact of the matter is this.
[01:57:39.580 --> 01:57:47.580]  If a debt collector buys a debt, then the original debt to a debt holder was paid.
[01:57:47.580 --> 01:57:56.580]  They also get compensated the second time on their taxes or some other means to reimburse them for that lost asset.
[01:57:56.580 --> 01:57:58.580]  That's a given.
[01:57:58.580 --> 01:58:04.580]  So what, then, is actually being transferred to the debt collector to collect on if they actually get paid,
[01:58:04.580 --> 01:58:11.580]  other than the debt the debt collector incurred by paying whatever amount he paid for the debt himself,
[01:58:11.580 --> 01:58:16.580]  which is what all that he would legally be limited to, to recover.
[01:58:16.580 --> 01:58:23.580]  Here's my question. Does the state of New York do the same thing that any other agency does and sell the...
[01:58:23.580 --> 01:58:27.580]  I don't know if they do or not, but you would have to find out in order to see.
[01:58:27.580 --> 01:58:30.580]  I don't live in New York. I can't answer that.
[01:58:30.580 --> 01:58:34.580]  Okay, then what happens if they sold the debt to the debt collector?
[01:58:34.580 --> 01:58:37.580]  I don't have time to get into that, John. I'm out of time.
[01:58:37.580 --> 01:58:40.580]  I told you I only had three minutes to get into this to begin with.
[01:58:40.580 --> 01:58:46.580]  All right, folks. Thanks for calling in. Thanks for listening. It's been the Rule of Law radio show on Monday night with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:46.580 --> 01:58:49.580]  Y'all have a great week. Good night. God bless.
[01:58:49.580 --> 01:58:57.580]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.580 --> 01:59:04.580]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.580 --> 01:59:07.580]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:07.580 --> 01:59:19.580]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.580 --> 01:59:29.580]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.580 --> 01:59:32.580]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.580 --> 01:59:40.580]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.580 --> 01:59:59.580]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.