ROL_2018-06-08_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:29.520] Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22 an ounce.
[00:29.520 --> 00:41.200] It's over $16.68 an ounce, Texas Crude $65.51 a barrel, Bitcoin $6,902.19, Ethereum $420.80,
[00:41.200 --> 00:55.520] Bitcoin Cash $652.90, and Finanly Lite Coins $114.34, a crypto coin.
[00:55.520 --> 01:01.240] Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01.240 --> 01:06.560] of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion,
[01:06.560 --> 01:08.040] sex, or national origin.
[01:08.040 --> 01:13.200] It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.200 --> 01:18.360] in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:18.360 --> 01:28.000] In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:28.000 --> 01:32.280] on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:32.280 --> 01:36.720] is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:36.720 --> 01:41.480] United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:41.480 --> 01:43.360] evidence as of yet.
[01:43.360 --> 01:47.200] President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and
[01:47.200 --> 01:51.560] all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new
[01:51.560 --> 01:56.400] and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal
[01:56.400 --> 01:58.640] who kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:58.640 --> 02:02.680] Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[02:02.680 --> 02:06.560] attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:06.560 --> 02:11.080] Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization
[02:11.080 --> 02:15.600] for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[02:15.600 --> 02:19.400] Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil
[02:19.400 --> 02:24.000] war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[02:24.000 --> 02:28.800] rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[02:28.800 --> 02:32.520] notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.520 --> 02:37.880] No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakhova posted on Facebook
[02:37.880 --> 02:42.200] that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[02:42.200 --> 02:46.800] has been fighting terrorists, or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart
[02:46.800 --> 02:51.200] missile strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at.
[02:51.200 --> 03:19.200] This was Brooke Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[03:19.200 --> 03:38.080] Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, rule of law radio on this the eighth day of June, 2018,
[03:38.080 --> 03:46.000] this Friday the eighth day of June, and thank you all for listening, and I'm going to start
[03:46.000 --> 03:50.640] out tonight talking about something I started out with yesterday, because sometimes I don't
[03:50.640 --> 03:54.520] get the same listeners, we get some crowing we get to do.
[03:54.520 --> 04:01.880] I'm sure those of you who listen regularly have heard Tim on here talking about his issue
[04:01.880 --> 04:11.640] with his auto repair place in Newark, Texas, and how his wife had an issue with the city
[04:11.640 --> 04:18.800] manager or city administrator, and as soon as his wife got off the city council the administrator
[04:18.800 --> 04:31.520] started a vendetta, started exercising a vendetta against them, and it turned into a real debacle.
[04:31.520 --> 04:42.120] Over eight alleged junk car violations issued to a auto repair shop, mostly on cars he had
[04:42.120 --> 04:52.560] waiting to be repaired, the city misdirected everything, violated just about every rule
[04:52.560 --> 05:03.760] in law they could, then they sued him for $80,000, and the district judge just absolutely
[05:03.760 --> 05:13.920] ignored every law they got in front of him, dismissed everything that Tim filed with prejudice,
[05:13.920 --> 05:19.480] and refused to provide finding de facto conclusions of law, and we filed criminal charges against
[05:19.480 --> 05:28.000] him for that, and they gave absolutely the least amount of time possible, the judge
[05:28.000 --> 05:34.120] granted everything the lawyers asked for, denied everything that Tim asked for, and
[05:34.120 --> 05:42.960] just attempted to literally railroad him out of the jury trial, and in the process we filed
[05:42.960 --> 05:50.240] motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, motion for summary judgment,
[05:50.240 --> 05:57.560] all kinds of stuff, they denied everything, so we filed a petition for written mandamus
[05:57.560 --> 06:06.320] with the court of appeals, and in reading the research on it and talking to other people
[06:06.320 --> 06:18.320] I was warned that only about 10%, 12% of the written mandamus filed were actually picked
[06:18.320 --> 06:26.560] up by the court, and only something like 4% were actually heard, well the judge got a
[06:26.560 --> 06:34.960] letter the 5th, from the court of appeals telling him that the court had serious issues
[06:34.960 --> 06:48.600] concerning the petitioner being Tim concerning his remedy, and gave the judge until the 15th,
[06:48.600 --> 06:56.560] that's 10 days to file finding de facto conclusions of law, or I'm sorry, to file a response to
[06:56.560 --> 07:07.760] the motion for written mandamus, and then gave Tim 5 days after that to file a response
[07:07.760 --> 07:15.800] but notice Tim that they may rule before the response is filed, and I took that to mean
[07:15.800 --> 07:22.480] that the district judge better come up with something really good, and they're going to
[07:22.480 --> 07:30.240] toss everything, and in looking at it I'm putting myself in the position of the district
[07:30.240 --> 07:38.480] judge, he absolutely has no law supporting what he's done, and if I were the district
[07:38.480 --> 07:49.760] judge, what do I do? I was asked to file finding de facto conclusions of law, and rules 397
[07:49.760 --> 07:58.680] demands me to file finding de facto within 20 days, I didn't, so I defended in the case
[07:58.680 --> 08:04.880] file criminal charges against me, and then I ruled against him on other stuff, similar
[08:04.880 --> 08:11.360] way he asked for finding de facto again, I refused to give it to him, and now I got
[08:11.360 --> 08:20.400] the court of appeals demanding that I support my decisions, so what do I do? Do I file a
[08:20.400 --> 08:26.800] bunch of BS with the court of appeals? It's a good chance they're not going to be happy
[08:26.800 --> 08:34.200] with the frivolous filing, and the only way he can try to support his position is essentially
[08:34.200 --> 08:40.200] to lie to the court, and make up a lot of stuff, but his problem is, is we were very
[08:40.200 --> 08:50.080] careful in protecting the record and getting the record before the court, so if I was in
[08:50.080 --> 08:58.040] his position and I couldn't file a document supporting my bad behavior, I would just do
[08:58.040 --> 09:06.400] nothing, and if he does nothing, then all of our assertions and contentions are as a
[09:06.400 --> 09:13.280] matter of law to be taken as true, and if they're taken as true, we have an absolute
[09:13.280 --> 09:23.000] right to the remedy we sought, and there's two remedies that we sought. One was a, the
[09:23.000 --> 09:32.120] motion and a dismissal of all of the, of the city suit that was filed in the district court,
[09:32.120 --> 09:39.840] and two were sanctions for $80,000, and these were asked for sanctions against the judge,
[09:39.840 --> 09:46.120] not opposing counsel, and we asked for $80,000 because that was the ridiculous amount that
[09:46.120 --> 09:53.680] opposing counsel asked for, ten times the amount of the actual fines levied, and the
[09:53.680 --> 10:02.840] fines were four times the amount allowed to be, I'm sorry, actually $1,600 was the amount
[10:02.840 --> 10:08.840] allowed to be charged by law, so it was almost six times the amount allowed to be charged
[10:08.840 --> 10:14.280] by law in the first place, and then they asked for ten times that, so we asked for sanctions
[10:14.280 --> 10:21.800] for $80,000. It will be interesting to see what the judge does. We were personally hoping
[10:21.800 --> 10:31.160] that he finds these facts because I suspect it will be half-truths and outright lies and
[10:31.160 --> 10:39.760] bad case law, so that when he does, we can go after him for sanctions, for an intentional
[10:39.760 --> 10:46.920] deliberate misrepresentation of law to the court of appeals. So we had a, that was a
[10:46.920 --> 10:55.000] pretty good win. I am going to turn the phone on. We'll keep them on all night, so if you
[10:55.000 --> 11:06.280] have a question or a comment, give us a call, 512-646-1984, and back to Tim. This is one
[11:06.280 --> 11:12.280] of those cases where they just threw everything at him, and what they try to do is wear you
[11:12.280 --> 11:17.360] down. They come after you, and every time you do anything, they come after you harder
[11:17.360 --> 11:24.640] and ask for more and do more and more outrageous and ridiculous stuff to try to make you feel
[11:24.640 --> 11:34.200] absolutely overwhelmed. But Tim's been coming back at him, bar grievances, judicial conduct
[11:34.200 --> 11:41.680] complaints, criminal complaints, so we've been pushing back. That's the thing that pretty
[11:41.680 --> 11:48.440] well kind of kept him on kilture is the fact that they could actually do something in return,
[11:48.440 --> 11:56.520] and they'll push you until you give up, and they push you with taxpayer money. So what
[11:56.520 --> 12:04.800] do they care until we start coming after Tim professionally? And that's what we've done.
[12:04.800 --> 12:13.960] And now we've got this notice by the Court of Appeals. Just about the time they thought
[12:13.960 --> 12:21.640] that they just couldn't do anymore, the court throws them a bone, and this was a serious
[12:21.640 --> 12:29.880] bone. If they throw out everything, then the worm turns. Now, the judge can dismiss all
[12:29.880 --> 12:36.480] of the claims by the plaintiff for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but not the claims
[12:36.480 --> 12:44.000] by the defendant, because we filed a counterclaim. The counterclaim stays. So now the only thing
[12:44.000 --> 12:50.280] before the Court is the counterclaim, and if the Court's forced to respond to the real
[12:50.280 --> 12:59.000] mandamus, then we move a second time to disqualify the judge. So we may actually be removed from
[12:59.000 --> 13:06.080] the case. If that does, if Judge Wells, who ruled against our first recusal, if we get
[13:06.080 --> 13:12.440] the Court of Appeals to reverse everything, then we go after Judge Wells, and we get to
[13:12.440 --> 13:20.000] start stinging all of them. So I guess the point of this is, is these guys come after
[13:20.000 --> 13:28.680] you, and they think they can do absolutely anything they want to, and they will act with
[13:28.680 --> 13:36.240] absolute and total disregard for law. Tim just went to court. They filed a second citation
[13:36.240 --> 13:46.360] on one of the vehicles, and the citation on its face is invalid, because one of the elements
[13:46.360 --> 13:56.240] that must be present when an automobile is alleged to be a junk vehicle under the statute
[13:56.240 --> 14:01.880] is it must not be registered. Well, this one's registered, and the complaint states that it
[14:01.880 --> 14:09.840] is registered. And because it's registered, doesn't matter if it's inoperable, doesn't
[14:09.840 --> 14:18.920] matter if it's partially dismantled. It does not fall under the statute. So they're deliberately
[14:18.920 --> 14:32.160] prosecuting him on a criminal accusation that on its face is invalid. But Tim didn't raise
[14:32.160 --> 14:41.520] that issue right away. He actually followed the steps, and the rules. One of our rules
[14:41.520 --> 14:47.200] is never interfere with someone when they screw it up. He got in court. He had filed
[14:47.200 --> 14:52.280] some motions. They said a motion hearing, and the judge instructed him that he would
[14:52.280 --> 14:59.320] have to argue the motions in court. He said he wasn't going to. The judge said, look,
[14:59.320 --> 15:05.240] let me explain to you how things work. You file a motion, and you have to come in and
[15:05.240 --> 15:15.920] argue the motion. And then the prosecutor can argue against the filing of the motion.
[15:15.920 --> 15:20.040] The good thing he didn't ask me that, tell me that, because I'd ask him, where did you
[15:20.040 --> 15:28.640] get that? Did you just make that up? Because it's certainly not in any code I've ever seen.
[15:28.640 --> 15:37.360] And the problem is, for the judge, he's regarded on tape. So Tim's in there with an affirmative
[15:37.360 --> 15:44.920] defense that would force the whole thing to be thrown out. But we're helping them live
[15:44.920 --> 15:50.720] along with their arrogance. He didn't file the affirmative defense. He filed a subject
[15:50.720 --> 15:57.920] meta-jurisdiction challenge. We will be filing a challenge to subject meta-jurisdiction claiming
[15:57.920 --> 16:04.640] res judicata, because the first time we filed a subject meta-jurisdiction challenge, they
[16:04.640 --> 16:11.000] didn't answer it. And since they didn't answer it, it becomes collateral estoppel. It becomes
[16:11.000 --> 16:18.240] a fact as a matter of law. So, based on their own judicial admission, they don't have the
[16:18.240 --> 16:25.280] authority to enforce any municipal code in the city of Newark. So we'll push that one
[16:25.280 --> 16:29.280] on and see how they dance around that. I want to see if they ignore it, like last time.
[16:29.280 --> 16:37.400] And then if they ignore it, then it becomes judicial admission, but as a matter of law.
[16:37.400 --> 16:41.760] And then see what the court does and give them an opportunity to screw up some more.
[16:41.760 --> 16:47.440] We don't have any callers on the call board, at least that I can tell. We refresh. We're
[16:47.440 --> 16:53.480] about to go to break. Oh, yeah, we do. That page is not refreshing. Okay, we've got a
[16:53.480 --> 16:57.720] bunch of callers. We'll start our calls. We'll come back on the other side. We'll be right
[16:57.720 --> 16:58.720] back.
[16:58.720 --> 17:10.280] It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and a gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[17:10.280 --> 17:17.520] GunWorks. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance
[17:17.520 --> 17:24.360] to win. From Central Texas GunWorks, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR
[17:24.360 --> 17:30.840] 15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[17:30.840 --> 17:36.840] Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get ten
[17:36.840 --> 17:43.600] chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the
[17:43.600 --> 17:48.400] shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the
[17:48.400 --> 17:54.320] best quality programming on Talk Radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency
[17:54.320 --> 18:00.640] projects. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.640 --> 18:05.920] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.920 --> 18:10.160] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. Michael Mearris has
[18:10.160 --> 18:15.080] won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win, too. You'll
[18:15.080 --> 18:19.920] get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[18:19.920 --> 18:25.000] rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:25.000 --> 18:29.440] answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[18:29.440 --> 18:34.560] how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael
[18:34.560 --> 18:40.040] Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation
[18:40.040 --> 18:45.080] is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleblowradio.com and click
[18:45.080 --> 18:52.080] on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:52.080 --> 19:18.080] or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:22.080 --> 19:38.840] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio and we've got a few callers on the
[19:38.840 --> 19:48.440] board. Let's start out with Scott in Texas. Hello, Scott. Howdy, howdy. Well, got a couple
[19:48.440 --> 19:56.760] of interesting things going on. One thing that was really interesting today is we had
[19:56.760 --> 20:03.160] a meeting with Pastor Masted and that was pretty cool and you also do your show with
[20:03.160 --> 20:08.640] him on Monday nights. I guess that's going to kick back off again and then he's wanting
[20:08.640 --> 20:13.880] me. Oh, wait, wait, wait. I've been doing the show for the last couple weeks. Oh, you
[20:13.880 --> 20:18.880] still are? Okay. Well, I hadn't started doing any recording so I'm going to start doing
[20:18.880 --> 20:26.960] some recordings and they'll go on Wednesday nights at 9 o'clock on truesradio.com and
[20:26.960 --> 20:33.000] you're on Monday nights at 8 o'clock on Trues Radio. So just in case anybody wants to tune
[20:33.000 --> 20:41.720] in. But also, I've been telling everybody about the new platform that's coming out,
[20:41.720 --> 20:47.960] the old.video and they actually sent me an email today and looks like I'm going to actually
[20:47.960 --> 20:55.160] have a live person that's going to actually handle the account and they're excited about
[20:55.160 --> 21:01.680] getting new content providers up on this platform. So I'm going to be telling everybody to get
[21:01.680 --> 21:09.520] off YouTube as soon as this one starts going and launching. It launches July 4 and I thought
[21:09.520 --> 21:20.240] that was really good. The last thing that I wanted to touch on is because we're always
[21:20.240 --> 21:28.280] talking about going after, you know, filing criminally and stuff on the judges with grand
[21:28.280 --> 21:35.800] juries and stuff and I've got to file a couple on some judges myself. But you know, also
[21:35.800 --> 21:42.920] these county judges, you know, kind of like for instance with Tim and his case, when I
[21:42.920 --> 21:49.880] started going after some of these county judges like Dallas County Judge, Clay Jenkins and
[21:49.880 --> 22:01.160] the Rockwall County Judge and Reigns County Judge, the reason that I was going after them
[22:01.160 --> 22:08.360] was in the form of supervisory neglect because they're letting their municipalities just
[22:08.360 --> 22:15.800] go rogue in their counties and they're supposed to be the ones that are in charge of the whole
[22:15.800 --> 22:25.080] shooting match, right? So what I'm saying is put pressure on the county judge too and
[22:25.080 --> 22:31.400] you start going after these county judges and you want to start pinching everybody, you
[22:31.400 --> 22:35.680] know, and making everybody start standing up and going, wait, what's going on around
[22:35.680 --> 22:41.160] here and start dragging everybody's feet in on it. Go after the county judge for supervisory
[22:41.160 --> 22:50.200] neglect and this is where how you can get them is with their vicarious liability and
[22:50.200 --> 22:55.680] I wanted to kind of go back over this because this is such a good topic, you know, the vicarious
[22:55.680 --> 23:03.920] versus strict liability. At the top, when he pulls you over and does whatever he does,
[23:03.920 --> 23:08.480] arrest you, say he arrests you and takes you to jail, you don't get some, you know, don't
[23:08.480 --> 23:13.480] go get an examining trial and violates all those laws and everything, well, he's being
[23:13.480 --> 23:23.920] held in a strict liability while the prosecutor, the district attorney for the county is acting
[23:23.920 --> 23:30.400] in his vicarious liability by allowing the cop to act in his strict liability but now
[23:30.400 --> 23:36.160] you go up the food chain, right? So now you start going after the county judge because
[23:36.160 --> 23:43.080] you would go after the county judge operating his vicarious liability and allowing the district
[23:43.080 --> 23:49.920] attorney to operate in his strict liability because he is violating his office by, you
[23:49.920 --> 23:57.960] know, these officers not being, not upholding the law as it is written, you know, and this
[23:57.960 --> 24:03.800] goes into, you know, Brady and all this other stuff, you know, their training and their
[24:03.800 --> 24:08.840] lack of training, especially when it comes to the cops, you know, and so that's where
[24:08.840 --> 24:20.520] the breakdown is. But this is good. One thing touch on if it's a municipal police officer
[24:20.520 --> 24:31.000] would not the mayor be in that chain? Of course he would. That's so if it's municipal, then
[24:31.000 --> 24:39.120] you go to the mayor first. And from the from the mayor, can we go directly to the county
[24:39.120 --> 24:47.120] judge? Does the county judge have supervisory authority or duty over a municipal court?
[24:47.120 --> 24:52.840] Do you know? Of the county and the municipality were a lot
[24:52.840 --> 24:59.520] resides in the county. So he's the county administrator operating over the whole county.
[24:59.520 --> 25:04.360] All municipalities fall under the county. Okay, hold on. Are you talking about, okay,
[25:04.360 --> 25:10.240] you're saying county judge, are you talking about the county courted law or the county
[25:10.240 --> 25:16.880] commissioners court judge? The commissioners court. Oh, okay, I was thinking county courted
[25:16.880 --> 25:24.120] law. Okay, so we're going after. Yeah, the commissioners court. Now we're
[25:24.120 --> 25:29.240] talking going barking up because when I filed against Clay Jenkins, they got all the way
[25:29.240 --> 25:34.400] I was going through the federal side, right? Well, immediately, you know, the district
[25:34.400 --> 25:38.680] judge here, he just said denied blah, blah, blah. So I peeled it. I went straight to the
[25:38.680 --> 25:44.840] appeals and the appeals wanted me to write a brief up on it, you know, and had to submit
[25:44.840 --> 25:50.320] it. And it was a lot of stuff going on. So I just withdrew it at the time. I said, no,
[25:50.320 --> 25:54.160] it's okay, I withdrew it. They're ready to kind of look at it and see what was going
[25:54.160 --> 26:04.000] on. Because of the way it's written and how you how you assign the duties and their liabilities
[26:04.000 --> 26:13.680] so that it falls into the ranks of how they're held accountable for their office. And I really
[26:13.680 --> 26:23.640] like the sound of this. Under insurance laws, the liability is all fraud, waste and abuse.
[26:23.640 --> 26:29.320] That's what all our training I deal with Medicare. And so we have to certify every year, you
[26:29.320 --> 26:33.640] know, and every you go through all the same certifications, you know, blah, blah, blah.
[26:33.640 --> 26:40.760] But the main focus is on government fraud, waste and abuse, either from the government
[26:40.760 --> 26:47.280] side or the private side. And that's where you're hammering these guys on on on their
[26:47.280 --> 26:53.200] fraud, waste and abuse. And then their abuse of the legal system would definitely fall
[26:53.200 --> 27:00.320] under those categories. Supervisory neglect and not overseeing what their officials are
[27:00.320 --> 27:02.280] doing in their county.
[27:02.280 --> 27:09.800] Okay, when you're saying liability, you're not talking about criminal liability here.
[27:09.800 --> 27:15.600] You're talking about civil liability. I mean, their ability to be sued against their bonds.
[27:15.600 --> 27:16.600] Is that correct?
[27:16.600 --> 27:17.600] Yeah.
[27:17.600 --> 27:24.720] So here we're talking about going after their insurance going after the money.
[27:24.720 --> 27:28.120] That's where I'm talking about.
[27:28.120 --> 27:34.160] And that's I like that idea because it gets it out. We take the court system out of the
[27:34.160 --> 27:42.480] court system and bring them into an administrative situation to where or a civil case where we're
[27:42.480 --> 27:48.640] suing them against their bonds. And okay, you're you know more about insurance. Do you
[27:48.640 --> 27:56.720] sue the insurance company directly? Or does the insurance company merely indemnify the
[27:56.720 --> 27:57.720] accused?
[27:57.720 --> 28:04.760] Well, the insurance company is going to step in because of their E and O insurance.
[28:04.760 --> 28:11.680] I understand that. But do you name the insurance company? Or is the insurance company just
[28:11.680 --> 28:14.840] there to step in and defend the accused?
[28:14.840 --> 28:17.840] We're just there to step in to defend.
[28:17.840 --> 28:22.360] Okay, that's what I always thought it was. I just want to make sure I was accurate because
[28:22.360 --> 28:28.760] we have some people wanting to sue the insurance companies or the bonding companies. And I had
[28:28.760 --> 28:36.320] always told them that you can't sue them directly. You sue the client and then the insurance
[28:36.320 --> 28:44.080] is between the client and the insurance company, not you don't have a privity in that contract.
[28:44.080 --> 28:49.320] So, okay, so that's clear. So we would sue the individual and it's up to the individual
[28:49.320 --> 28:57.160] to bring in the insurance company. So we can't sue the insurance company directly.
[28:57.160 --> 29:03.520] After you sue the individual and you get a judgment, then you can actually sue the insurance
[29:03.520 --> 29:06.440] company that held the contract.
[29:06.440 --> 29:10.840] Okay, that's you can sue them if they don't pay up.
[29:10.840 --> 29:18.840] Well, you can sue them for actually issuing that errors and omissions. So, you know, you
[29:18.840 --> 29:23.000] can start that's where you start going. But you have to get your judgment against the
[29:23.000 --> 29:28.160] person that you sue first to show that they're guilty. And now you're suing the insurance
[29:28.160 --> 29:31.200] company for insuring a guilty person.
[29:31.200 --> 29:45.220] Oh, that's an interesting prospect. So what duty does the insurance company have when
[29:45.220 --> 29:51.800] insuring a client? It would seem that bad policy on part of the insurance company would
[29:51.800 --> 29:59.120] only hurt the insurance company. So how does that make them liable to you?
[29:59.120 --> 30:04.560] Or they're closed line police? Yep, they'll hang you out to dry if you're caught with
[30:04.560 --> 30:08.280] your laundry swaying in the breeze. I've got your Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back
[30:08.280 --> 30:11.960] in a moment with the lineup on crazy closed line laws.
[30:11.960 --> 30:17.320] Your search engine is watching you recording all your searches and creating a massive database
[30:17.320 --> 30:23.200] of your personal information. That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way. Startpage.com
[30:23.200 --> 30:27.720] is the world's most private search engine. Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make
[30:27.720 --> 30:31.920] a record of your searches or use tracking cookies, and their third party certified.
[30:31.920 --> 30:37.360] If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results
[30:37.360 --> 30:42.520] and total privacy. Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:42.520 --> 30:47.120] Drying laundry on a clothesline is earth friendly and keeps millions of tons of CO2 out of the
[30:47.120 --> 30:51.560] atmosphere. And since the dryer is an energy hog, a clothesline could slash your annual
[30:51.560 --> 30:55.400] energy bill too. But in many communities, you may not have the right to hang your clothes
[30:55.400 --> 31:00.200] outside, even in your own backyard. Millions of Americans live in communities that ban
[31:00.200 --> 31:04.280] clotheslines, get caught with your laundry swaying in the breeze, and you could face
[31:04.280 --> 31:09.280] legal action. Citizens like Alexander Lee, founder of Project Laundry List, are fighting
[31:09.280 --> 31:14.760] back. Visit his website laundrylist.org to learn how you can help overthrow crazy clothesline
[31:14.760 --> 31:18.400] laws and reclaim the right to dry laundry in the great outdoors.
[31:18.400 --> 31:25.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:48.400 --> 32:13.800] We're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right
[32:13.800 --> 32:39.560] to
[32:39.560 --> 32:43.560] By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:43.560 --> 32:47.560] The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:47.560 --> 32:50.560] Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.560 --> 32:54.560] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.560 --> 32:58.560] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:58.560 --> 33:10.560] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:10.560 --> 33:22.560] Yeah, I got the warrant and I'm going to solve them to the government then.
[33:22.560 --> 33:34.560] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, the 8th day of June, 2018.
[33:34.560 --> 33:42.560] And we're talking to Scott in Texas and just for the record, Scott, I did not fall off the cliff that time.
[33:42.560 --> 33:50.560] You did. You did. I'll tell Deborah and she'll skin your hide.
[33:50.560 --> 33:57.560] No, she won't. No, she won't just skin my hide. Okay, go ahead.
[33:57.560 --> 34:05.560] Yeah, so you were asking about how could the insurance company be held liability?
[34:05.560 --> 34:11.560] Well, the judges and all that, they have to take their classes, they have to recertify.
[34:11.560 --> 34:14.560] They're supposed to know the law.
[34:14.560 --> 34:22.560] In fact, when I even talked to this going judge here in Garland on this last deal I had before him,
[34:22.560 --> 34:31.560] we had a little private chat right after the little case where he gave me the traditional railroad.
[34:31.560 --> 34:44.560] So we were sitting there talking about the law and all this stuff and hey, I'm bringing this stuff to you and you're telling me where I went wrong.
[34:44.560 --> 34:57.560] And then that's where he started going. He said these legislatures are passing these laws and even they can't even figure out how they got there.
[34:57.560 --> 35:03.560] And so I said, well, and he said they're just trying to be correct. And I said, you mean politically correct?
[35:03.560 --> 35:05.560] And he was like, yeah.
[35:05.560 --> 35:11.560] And so I said, well, now that we know that the system is broken, how do we fix it?
[35:11.560 --> 35:15.560] And he said, it's going to take more people like you, come in here.
[35:15.560 --> 35:17.560] I submitted so much paperwork on him.
[35:17.560 --> 35:26.560] He actually said, if I wasn't a judge, I'd like to sit around and pick your brain because it was really well put together.
[35:26.560 --> 35:33.560] I basically just submitted a brief. It's the same brief I would submit now to even an appeals court or anything.
[35:33.560 --> 35:39.560] It's so basic and well written. It's like, here it is, you know, how are you going to argue your own law?
[35:39.560 --> 35:45.560] I mean, it's your law, I didn't write stuff, you know.
[35:45.560 --> 36:01.560] But going after these county judges and start really rattling their cages and making them aware that, you know, hey, you're the head honcho of this whole county here.
[36:01.560 --> 36:07.560] And if you don't tighten the reins up on these people, then you're going to be held accountable for it.
[36:07.560 --> 36:23.560] And once you are able to start naming how they're liable and, you know, and start documenting who's going rogue, where, you know, it just puts itself together right after that.
[36:23.560 --> 36:29.560] And so then it just becomes too, finding the judge will actually rule on the facts and the law.
[36:29.560 --> 36:31.560] And that's the whole crux of the issue.
[36:31.560 --> 36:52.560] And so, you know, here's the part I'm trying to keep separating is the judge who rules all the facts and law as opposed to the county commissioners court judge who is in a political position and I like the politics side.
[36:52.560 --> 37:02.560] The commissioners court judge doesn't have any authority in the criminal courts, but he does have authority over budgets.
[37:02.560 --> 37:25.560] I don't know how much authority we can attribute to the commissioners court judge on this duty of the judge to oversee other elected public officials.
[37:25.560 --> 37:38.560] Well, I want to understand how we can get at the county commissioners court judge when a elected official acts improperly.
[37:38.560 --> 37:47.560] Well, however you want to look at it, I mean, you know, that's how I wrote it up and named it that way.
[37:47.560 --> 37:51.560] And it was, it was starting to get some traction going through the courts.
[37:51.560 --> 37:54.560] And I guarantee you they had to read that stuff.
[37:54.560 --> 37:58.560] Wait, do you have case law and supervisory neglect?
[37:58.560 --> 38:01.560] I didn't have anything on it.
[38:01.560 --> 38:04.560] I just wrote it up.
[38:04.560 --> 38:11.560] You know, it's interesting.
[38:11.560 --> 38:14.560] You just made it up.
[38:14.560 --> 38:16.560] Oh, wonderful.
[38:16.560 --> 38:25.560] That's why they're, what they're seeing is, is, is you coming in with a first plus issue?
[38:25.560 --> 38:27.560] Okay.
[38:27.560 --> 38:29.560] Nobody's ever looked at that before.
[38:29.560 --> 38:35.560] So they're probably having trouble finding case law to support their side.
[38:35.560 --> 38:44.560] You know, we have this rule that says you never make proactive statement out of your own mouth, make it out of the mouth of the legislature or the court.
[38:44.560 --> 38:59.560] Well, if there is nothing in the courts, then they're going to have to come back and rebut and they're going to have to make proactive statements of law out of their own mouth.
[38:59.560 --> 39:06.560] But if there's no law on the subject, you may have them dancing.
[39:06.560 --> 39:18.560] I guarantee you it woke some people up because they're looking at it because then when you start naming the liability and the vicarious liability, they have to rebut it.
[39:18.560 --> 39:19.560] So rebut it.
[39:19.560 --> 39:21.560] Tell me I'm wrong.
[39:21.560 --> 39:23.560] Prove it.
[39:23.560 --> 39:25.560] Who's in charge here?
[39:25.560 --> 39:26.560] What is your duty here?
[39:26.560 --> 39:28.560] You're the county judge.
[39:28.560 --> 39:30.560] Prove it.
[39:30.560 --> 39:33.560] What are you doing here?
[39:33.560 --> 39:39.560] Okay, I'm going to do some research on supervisory neglect.
[39:39.560 --> 39:48.560] It definitely goes to, well, I would think that supervisory neglect would have to go to respond to get superior.
[39:48.560 --> 40:01.560] And I need to find a way to hold the county commissioners court judge somehow responsible for the offices he funds.
[40:01.560 --> 40:07.560] I guess the county commissioners court provides funding for the sheriff and the county court judge.
[40:07.560 --> 40:11.560] It judges office and the JPs.
[40:11.560 --> 40:13.560] Not the municipal.
[40:13.560 --> 40:18.560] I don't know how to get the county commissioners court to the municipal, but I'll look at it.
[40:18.560 --> 40:20.560] Well, it's a first blush issue.
[40:20.560 --> 40:30.560] Like you said, you know, I mean, if there's no remedy, that's because nobody's brought this issue up to seek remedy.
[40:30.560 --> 40:41.560] Well, I think I would know how to argue it, but I haven't found lawyers that seem to be very perceptive.
[40:41.560 --> 40:55.560] My argument would be the county commissioners court judge only has the responsibilities that are specified in law to the county commissioners court judge.
[40:55.560 --> 41:16.560] And if I could find nothing in law that specifically commands the commissioners court judge to exercise supervisory duties over the public whose office he funds, I could argue off from under that one.
[41:16.560 --> 41:21.560] So that's why I want to find something more to support that.
[41:21.560 --> 41:33.560] It doesn't take a whole lot to I can see that this term supervisory neglect is a relatively common legal term.
[41:33.560 --> 41:41.560] And you took a common legal term and applied it to a places normally not ever applied.
[41:41.560 --> 41:46.560] Oh, that is rich.
[41:46.560 --> 41:56.560] Well, I wrote it up and submitted it and, you know, and, you know, it's basically where the this is where I came up with a term turning a blind eye.
[41:56.560 --> 42:02.560] And I posted that up on a video and that kind of everybody started using that term later on.
[42:02.560 --> 42:20.560] So this, you know, the county judge is turning a blind eye on all his people that are under him. And he's the main, you know, legal body that's in charge of the county.
[42:20.560 --> 42:24.560] I mean, you know, he's the one that's in charge of everything.
[42:24.560 --> 42:32.560] Okay, I'm having a hard time getting there.
[42:32.560 --> 42:40.560] The sheriff is absolute authority over the sheriff's deputies.
[42:40.560 --> 42:43.560] He's an elected official.
[42:43.560 --> 42:48.560] So he doesn't have a superior.
[42:48.560 --> 42:54.560] The county court is an elected official. He doesn't have a superior.
[42:54.560 --> 43:04.560] The municipal court has a superior and that would be the mayor, but the mayor is elected and he doesn't have a superior.
[43:04.560 --> 43:13.560] So I'm trying to find a way to stick the county commissioners court to these other offices.
[43:13.560 --> 43:21.560] The one thing the county commissioners court does is fund those offices.
[43:21.560 --> 43:31.560] That's what we're doing anyway is after their money and holding them in their in their liabilities and operating in their vicarious liability.
[43:31.560 --> 43:44.560] Well, that's what I'm trying to get to. How can we accuse the county commissioners court of acting in concert and collusion with these officials who are acting in violation of law?
[43:44.560 --> 43:50.560] He's acting in concert and collusion by funding their escapades.
[43:50.560 --> 43:54.560] There you go.
[43:54.560 --> 44:01.560] It might work. It takes some legal research, but I'm trying to find a way to...
[44:01.560 --> 44:09.560] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:09.560 --> 44:14.560] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[44:14.560 --> 44:18.560] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[44:18.560 --> 44:23.560] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers and journalists.
[44:23.560 --> 44:26.560] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[44:26.560 --> 44:31.560] In addition, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangierine and Pollenburgs.
[44:31.560 --> 44:38.560] We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[44:38.560 --> 44:42.560] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept bitcoins as payment.
[44:42.560 --> 44:45.560] Call us at 512-646-6440.
[44:45.560 --> 44:50.560] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[44:50.560 --> 44:53.560] We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[44:53.560 --> 44:59.560] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[44:59.560 --> 45:03.560] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:03.560 --> 45:14.560] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:14.560 --> 45:18.560] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.560 --> 45:22.560] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.560 --> 45:27.560] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:27.560 --> 45:33.560] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:33.560 --> 45:42.560] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:42.560 --> 45:51.560] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:51.560 --> 45:55.560] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[45:55.560 --> 46:14.560] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:14.560 --> 46:30.560] All rights reserved.
[46:30.560 --> 46:32.560] OK, we are back.
[46:32.560 --> 46:42.560] Randy Kelton rules our radio, and we're talking to Scott in Texas, and I ran off to Clifster.
[46:42.560 --> 46:46.560] OK, we probably need to move along.
[46:46.560 --> 46:53.560] I've got a whole board full of callers, and we've probably beat this to death until we've done some more research.
[46:53.560 --> 47:01.560] Well, I did a little bit of filing on it, so it's kind of woken everybody up to make them do their research too.
[47:01.560 --> 47:06.560] Absolutely. Let's send them to the books.
[47:06.560 --> 47:10.560] There you go. All right, I'll start you later. Bye.
[47:10.560 --> 47:18.560] OK, thank you, Scott. Now we're going to John 678 Area Code.
[47:18.560 --> 47:25.560] I don't have a state on you, John, and I think you might be a first-time caller.
[47:25.560 --> 47:27.560] There, John.
[47:27.560 --> 47:30.560] There you go.
[47:30.560 --> 47:32.560] What state are you in, John?
[47:32.560 --> 47:34.560] I'm in Michigan.
[47:34.560 --> 47:37.560] Michigan. OK, are you a first-time caller?
[47:37.560 --> 47:39.560] I sure am.
[47:39.560 --> 47:43.560] But I didn't recognize the name. OK, what do you have for us today?
[47:43.560 --> 47:51.560] Well, I've been listening with great interest to your show for last Friday and the discussion of a due process.
[47:51.560 --> 47:59.560] It seems like the A strategy is to go after them for failing to do something the law requires, and that seems pretty straightforward.
[47:59.560 --> 48:04.560] But how do you go after them under color of law for due process violation?
[48:04.560 --> 48:08.560] What specifics is your complaint against the officer take?
[48:08.560 --> 48:16.560] OK, you look at the code. What does the code tell the officer he must do?
[48:16.560 --> 48:22.560] And in Michigan, you're going to have a statute of official misconduct.
[48:22.560 --> 48:31.560] Texas is the only one that I know of that has the official misconduct statute broken into two pieces.
[48:31.560 --> 48:36.560] In Texas, if you misappropriate public funds, that's the official misconduct.
[48:36.560 --> 48:40.560] If you deny a citizen in a right, that's official oppression.
[48:40.560 --> 48:44.560] In most states, they're both combined.
[48:44.560 --> 48:54.560] And in any case, they all reflect 18 U.S. Code 242, the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[48:54.560 --> 49:04.560] And 18 U.S. Code 242 goes to any official abusing his office, either by misfeasance or mal-feasance.
[49:04.560 --> 49:07.560] Misfeasance is where he fails to perform a duty.
[49:07.560 --> 49:12.560] Mal-feasance is where he performs a duty he's not authorized to perform.
[49:12.560 --> 49:18.560] So if a policeman exerted or purported to exert an authority he didn't have,
[49:18.560 --> 49:24.560] for instance, he arrested you for something that's not technically a crime.
[49:24.560 --> 49:32.560] Or if he failed to perform a duty he's required to perform, and in most every state,
[49:32.560 --> 49:37.560] you have a right to a preliminary hearing.
[49:37.560 --> 49:47.560] And while the feds do not statutorily or constitutionally mandate an examining trial,
[49:47.560 --> 49:50.560] an examining trial is a preliminary hearing.
[49:50.560 --> 49:58.560] Under Gerstein Pugh, they made it clear that when a person is accused by a citizen
[49:58.560 --> 50:05.560] and an accusation is always by a citizen, the citizen may or may not be a police officer.
[50:05.560 --> 50:12.560] Being a police officer is irrelevant to the context of the filing of the claim.
[50:12.560 --> 50:17.560] All crimes are noticed by citizens.
[50:17.560 --> 50:23.560] So when a policeman files a criminal complaint, he does so in his capacity as a credible citizen,
[50:23.560 --> 50:25.560] a credible person.
[50:25.560 --> 50:29.560] I'm saying citizen and that's not correct, credible person.
[50:29.560 --> 50:33.560] You do not have to be a citizen to file a criminal complaint.
[50:33.560 --> 50:40.560] You really must be over the age of 18 and never convicted of a felony.
[50:40.560 --> 50:44.560] That's the definition of credible person.
[50:44.560 --> 50:50.560] So when the policeman files a complaint, he does it as a credible person.
[50:50.560 --> 50:58.560] But when a policeman takes someone into custody and restricts them at their liberty,
[50:58.560 --> 51:03.560] the constitution allows that.
[51:03.560 --> 51:10.560] But the law supporting the right to be free from unreasonable seizure
[51:10.560 --> 51:21.560] requires that the officer, after making the arrest, take you directly to a neutral magistrate for a determination of probable cause.
[51:21.560 --> 51:30.560] If they fail to do that, then the officer has failed to perform the duty he is required to perform.
[51:30.560 --> 51:38.560] Now here in Texas, they misinterpreted a case to Troy V.U.S., the state of Texas,
[51:38.560 --> 51:46.560] to say that you don't have a right to an examining trial and a misdemeanor.
[51:46.560 --> 51:50.560] And this goes to playing with words.
[51:50.560 --> 51:57.560] And when they tell me that, I say, yeah, I know, I don't have a right to be handcuffed either.
[51:57.560 --> 51:59.560] I don't have a right to be arrested.
[51:59.560 --> 52:02.560] I don't have a right to be hauled off to jail.
[52:02.560 --> 52:06.560] But an officer, when he has knowledge that a crime has been committed,
[52:06.560 --> 52:10.560] he has a duty to arrest me.
[52:10.560 --> 52:16.560] And then he has a duty to take me directly to the nearest magistrate,
[52:16.560 --> 52:21.560] doesn't make any difference if I have a right to go there or not.
[52:21.560 --> 52:24.560] The right, in this case, is irrelevant.
[52:24.560 --> 52:33.560] It is a statutory duty, and a statutory duty on the part of my public officials goes to due process.
[52:33.560 --> 52:37.560] And under due process, I do have rights.
[52:37.560 --> 52:39.560] Well, mine didn't go that far.
[52:39.560 --> 52:41.560] In other words, he didn't arrest me.
[52:41.560 --> 52:45.560] He just detained me and then stole my car and then impounded it.
[52:45.560 --> 52:47.560] Oh, whoa, stop, stop, stop.
[52:47.560 --> 52:48.560] Hold on.
[52:48.560 --> 52:56.560] Did he put you in a position such that you were arrested in your freedom of movement?
[52:56.560 --> 52:59.560] Sure, several times.
[52:59.560 --> 53:01.560] You were arrested?
[53:01.560 --> 53:03.560] Well, I mean...
[53:03.560 --> 53:06.560] They can call it a detention.
[53:06.560 --> 53:11.560] They can call it a tarry stop and call it whatever they want to.
[53:11.560 --> 53:16.560] But when your freedom of movement is arrested, you are under arrest.
[53:16.560 --> 53:20.560] And the courts have upheld that over and over.
[53:20.560 --> 53:22.560] Okay, go ahead.
[53:22.560 --> 53:24.560] I know what you're saying when you say that.
[53:24.560 --> 53:28.560] During the time of the detainment, when I wasn't free to go,
[53:28.560 --> 53:32.560] I was under arrest for all intents and purposes.
[53:32.560 --> 53:33.560] Exactly.
[53:33.560 --> 53:41.560] If you had attempted to leave, they would have used force even to the point of deadly force.
[53:41.560 --> 53:42.560] Sure.
[53:42.560 --> 53:45.560] And I mean, they were even making threats to that enemy.
[53:45.560 --> 53:51.560] But at any rate, if they don't have probable cause to pull me over and then they impound my vehicle,
[53:51.560 --> 53:57.560] isn't it aggravated death to take the car with the load that you're still on your hip?
[53:57.560 --> 53:58.560] No.
[53:58.560 --> 53:59.560] No, it's not aggravated.
[53:59.560 --> 54:02.560] It's not theft.
[54:02.560 --> 54:08.560] The theft is distinguished in that, especially with automobiles,
[54:08.560 --> 54:13.560] we came across this in Illinois directly.
[54:13.560 --> 54:19.560] When I grew up in Chicago and some people stole my father's car
[54:19.560 --> 54:24.560] and they found the car in an alley with the tires missing
[54:24.560 --> 54:27.560] and found out who did it and arrested him.
[54:27.560 --> 54:32.560] But they didn't charge him with stealing my father's car.
[54:32.560 --> 54:39.560] And the reason they didn't is they said the theft statute only goes to
[54:39.560 --> 54:45.560] taking someone's property with the intent of never returning it.
[54:45.560 --> 54:50.560] They took my father's car, but they didn't keep it.
[54:50.560 --> 54:54.560] They just stole the tires, not the car.
[54:54.560 --> 54:59.560] So if somebody takes your car and they joyride with it and then they park it somewhere
[54:59.560 --> 55:03.560] and they don't sell it or dismantle it, they can't charge them with theft.
[55:03.560 --> 55:09.560] They can charge them with, what is it?
[55:09.560 --> 55:14.560] There they call it joyriding, but we don't have that statute in Texas.
[55:14.560 --> 55:17.560] A criminal mischief.
[55:17.560 --> 55:19.560] But they can't charge them with theft.
[55:19.560 --> 55:25.560] You can't charge them with theft, but you can charge them with criminal mischief.
[55:25.560 --> 55:32.560] And what makes your complaints more compelling is that you're more specific
[55:32.560 --> 55:37.560] and the term I like to use is pedantic.
[55:37.560 --> 55:42.560] You're very specific in particular to points of law.
[55:42.560 --> 55:45.560] Makes it real hard for them to argue against you.
[55:45.560 --> 55:50.560] And the more nitpicking your complaint is, the better.
[55:50.560 --> 55:53.560] Because the harder it is for them to fight it.
[55:53.560 --> 55:56.560] They want to say, well, this is nonsense.
[55:56.560 --> 55:58.560] That's nonsense to you.
[55:58.560 --> 56:05.560] But when my tires touch the yellow line, filing a complaint against me is just as much nonsense
[56:05.560 --> 56:14.560] as my accusing this officer of asking me why I wanted to see a record.
[56:14.560 --> 56:20.560] I filed information requests and I structured them so that the person receiving it will look at it
[56:20.560 --> 56:25.560] and say, why in the heck is he asking for this?
[56:25.560 --> 56:31.560] And what I want him to do is say, why do you want to see these records 9-1-1?
[56:31.560 --> 56:34.560] It always gets 9-1-1 call.
[56:34.560 --> 56:39.560] And he gets it so fast, they don't know what's happening.
[56:39.560 --> 56:42.560] And it is so nitpicking.
[56:42.560 --> 56:48.560] But the law says if they say anything that stops you in the course of requesting information,
[56:48.560 --> 56:50.560] they have broken the law.
[56:50.560 --> 56:57.560] What our open records law says in Texas, and you'll almost certainly have the same thing,
[56:57.560 --> 57:07.560] is that the custodian of the record may make no inquiry of the requester other than to determine
[57:07.560 --> 57:12.560] his identity and the records sought.
[57:12.560 --> 57:17.560] So it doesn't specifically say you can't ask them why.
[57:17.560 --> 57:20.560] It says you can't ask them any other questions.
[57:20.560 --> 57:27.560] I just went into court yesterday with Tim and I told the bailiff to tell the clerk that I needed
[57:27.560 --> 57:30.560] a copy of today's appearance docket.
[57:30.560 --> 57:35.560] And the clerk came over and said, and who are you?
[57:35.560 --> 57:37.560] Oh, no, no, no, no, no.
[57:37.560 --> 57:38.560] I'm smiling at it.
[57:38.560 --> 57:39.560] Oh, no, no, no, no.
[57:39.560 --> 57:41.560] You don't get to ask that question.
[57:41.560 --> 57:44.560] You just get to go get my copy of the docket.
[57:44.560 --> 57:47.560] And she already knew who I was.
[57:47.560 --> 57:49.560] Everybody in the courtroom did.
[57:49.560 --> 57:53.560] She said, oh, oh, well, okay.
[57:53.560 --> 58:00.560] She didn't fall for it because that was an open record.
[58:00.560 --> 58:03.560] That was a court record.
[58:03.560 --> 58:13.560] And when I come in to court, when you walk into a courtroom, you have no duty to identify yourself.
[58:13.560 --> 58:20.560] I had the bailiff furious at me because I wouldn't tell him my name.
[58:20.560 --> 58:26.560] And he wanted to know my name and what my business was in the courtroom.
[58:26.560 --> 58:31.560] And I told him I'm here for entertainment.
[58:31.560 --> 58:34.560] He was bald and his old head was glowing.
[58:34.560 --> 58:37.560] And he's threatening to throw me out of the court.
[58:37.560 --> 58:45.560] And I stood up in the courtroom while the judge is talking to a defendant and hollered out in the courtroom.
[58:45.560 --> 58:49.560] Your honor, the judge started looking up.
[58:49.560 --> 58:53.560] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:53.560 --> 59:00.560] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.560 --> 59:05.560] The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:05.560 --> 59:12.560] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:12.560 --> 59:17.560] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:17.560 --> 59:27.560] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:27.560 --> 59:33.560] To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.560 --> 59:40.560] call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.560 --> 59:44.560] That's 888-551-0102.
[59:44.560 --> 59:58.560] Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:14.560 --> 01:00:23.560] Let's dive into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:44.560 --> 01:01:02.560] Today in history, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968,
[01:01:02.560 --> 01:01:08.560] which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:01:08.560 --> 01:01:17.560] It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in public schools, and employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:01:17.560 --> 01:01:23.560] Today in history.
[01:01:23.560 --> 01:01:31.560] In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured.
[01:01:31.560 --> 01:01:38.560] An attack which is being blamed on the democratically elected President of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the United States, and on Israel by Russia.
[01:01:38.560 --> 01:01:42.560] Either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as of yet.
[01:01:42.560 --> 01:01:48.560] President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday, that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria,
[01:01:48.560 --> 01:01:52.560] get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new and smart.
[01:01:52.560 --> 01:01:58.560] Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:01:58.560 --> 01:02:06.560] I mean, the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[01:02:06.560 --> 01:02:15.560] Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[01:02:15.560 --> 01:02:24.560] Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian rebels
[01:02:24.560 --> 01:02:31.560] that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:31.560 --> 01:02:39.560] No surprise, then, why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakhova posted on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists
[01:02:39.560 --> 01:02:43.560] and not at a legitimate government, which has been fighting terrorists.
[01:02:43.560 --> 01:02:50.560] Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:02:50.560 --> 01:02:56.560] This was Kirk Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:20.560 --> 01:03:33.560] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, we were already talking to John in music.
[01:03:33.560 --> 01:03:38.560] And, okay, when I left off, I just stood up in the court and stood at the bar and hollered out to the judge.
[01:03:38.560 --> 01:03:43.560] And the judge had looked up and he said, what's going on?
[01:03:43.560 --> 01:03:50.560] And the bailiff said, this man won't identify him Saturday. He won't tell me what he's doing in his court.
[01:03:50.560 --> 01:03:57.560] I'm sorry, when the judge said, what's going on? I said, your honor, will you pull this bulldog off of me?
[01:03:57.560 --> 01:04:03.560] The judge said, what's going on? The bailiff told him I wouldn't tell him who I was and what I was doing in the court.
[01:04:03.560 --> 01:04:06.560] And the judge said, sir, do you mind if I ask who you are?
[01:04:06.560 --> 01:04:14.560] I said, I don't mind at all. Well, do you mind if I ask why you're in my courtroom?
[01:04:14.560 --> 01:04:18.560] And I said, oh, I'm here for entertainment.
[01:04:18.560 --> 01:04:27.560] Oh, okay. And he turned to the bailiff and he said, bailiff, leave him alone.
[01:04:27.560 --> 01:04:34.560] The judge understood. When you go into a court, they can't ask you who you are.
[01:04:34.560 --> 01:04:42.560] You can't be asked to identify yourself unless you're held under arrest for a crime.
[01:04:42.560 --> 01:04:57.560] And I had other business, otherwise I'd have called 911 on the bailiff because he exerted or purported to exert an authority he did not expressly have.
[01:04:57.560 --> 01:05:07.560] And he did so while prominently displaying a deadly weapon. These guys are not accustomed to you and I as ordinary citizens coming after them.
[01:05:07.560 --> 01:05:13.560] They're accustomed to us coming after them if they do something really outrageous.
[01:05:13.560 --> 01:05:25.560] But minor nitpicking stuff and, you know, my favorite thing to go after them with is something I set them up for.
[01:05:25.560 --> 01:05:36.560] Last Friday, did I talk about my tar baby? I got this little invisible tar baby.
[01:05:36.560 --> 01:05:41.560] Okay. I always carry that around with me.
[01:05:41.560 --> 01:05:47.560] Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want him to do because you won't touch tar baby.
[01:05:47.560 --> 01:05:57.560] And the more nitpicking what you ask them to do is the better because they never see it coming.
[01:05:57.560 --> 01:06:06.560] And when you do land on them, they say, that rascal set me up for that.
[01:06:06.560 --> 01:06:14.560] And if they ask me, yeah, as a matter of fact, I did. It doesn't make any difference.
[01:06:14.560 --> 01:06:21.560] When you said hand the cop, complain against the cop by handing the cop to the mayor and then go ask the mayor for doing the act.
[01:06:21.560 --> 01:06:23.560] I thought that was pretty good setup.
[01:06:23.560 --> 01:06:34.560] Oh, okay. Understand. You will never win your case simply because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:06:34.560 --> 01:06:45.560] To think so is naive. It is not that way now. Never has been that way as long as we've had human beings as judges.
[01:06:45.560 --> 01:06:53.560] You will only win your case if you have the politics on your side and all politics is local.
[01:06:53.560 --> 01:07:00.560] Now generally the first time I say that to somebody, they think, oh my goodness, that's horrible.
[01:07:00.560 --> 01:07:04.560] You mean the law doesn't apply and now I can't depend on the law?
[01:07:04.560 --> 01:07:09.560] Well, it's not really horrible. I mean, it is the way it is.
[01:07:09.560 --> 01:07:15.560] And it's only a problem if you don't understand how it actually works.
[01:07:15.560 --> 01:07:23.560] So we do bring in the law, but that's only so we can use it to get to the politics.
[01:07:23.560 --> 01:07:32.560] Once we understand the politics, we have more power politically than any of those officials do.
[01:07:32.560 --> 01:07:34.560] Right.
[01:07:34.560 --> 01:07:41.560] When you walk into that courthouse, you are the baddest motor scooter in the building.
[01:07:41.560 --> 01:07:45.560] There's only one reason you're the baddest motor scooter in the building.
[01:07:45.560 --> 01:07:54.560] And that's because you're not a judge. You're not a prosecutor, a bailiff, a clerk. They're all public servants.
[01:07:54.560 --> 01:08:02.560] They're the servant. You're the master. And you should not let them forget it.
[01:08:02.560 --> 01:08:06.560] When you walk into a courthouse, you carry two hats with you.
[01:08:06.560 --> 01:08:10.560] You generally walk in with your litigants hat on.
[01:08:10.560 --> 01:08:21.560] But if one of your officials steps across one of your legal lines as a citizen in a sovereign citizen in a republic,
[01:08:21.560 --> 01:08:27.560] you are the master of those servants. And it is your duty to put them back in line.
[01:08:27.560 --> 01:08:33.560] Now, I think I never want to get a public official indicted.
[01:08:33.560 --> 01:08:36.560] And I never want to harm the career.
[01:08:36.560 --> 01:08:40.560] I kind of think of my public officials like I do my grandkids.
[01:08:40.560 --> 01:08:43.560] I love them dearly.
[01:08:43.560 --> 01:08:50.560] But if one of them runs out on the road, I'm fixing to stand his hide. That's my job.
[01:08:50.560 --> 01:08:56.560] It's your job as the master of the servant to keep the servant in line.
[01:08:56.560 --> 01:09:05.560] And the best way to do it is you don't wait until the grandchild is in the middle of the road to spank him.
[01:09:05.560 --> 01:09:10.560] You spank him when he gets close to the edge.
[01:09:10.560 --> 01:09:17.560] We don't wait until our public officials do something horrendous that will cause us in their career.
[01:09:17.560 --> 01:09:26.560] You entice them into stepping across a minor legal line, then you drop on them like a ton of bricks.
[01:09:26.560 --> 01:09:34.560] And when you go to the next hire official and they don't do their job, you clover that next hire official.
[01:09:34.560 --> 01:09:40.560] Now, the official says you go up the line. They're just trying to cover this guy's behind.
[01:09:40.560 --> 01:09:44.560] And now I got this guy coming after me.
[01:09:44.560 --> 01:09:47.560] Well, they're going to react with righteousness indignation.
[01:09:47.560 --> 01:09:56.560] They don't feel like they did anything wrong. Now I'm getting in trouble with all your fault. You sacked him on me.
[01:09:56.560 --> 01:10:11.560] If you're ever in the military, John, you'll understand this notion of bad stuff rolling downhill.
[01:10:11.560 --> 01:10:22.560] When I was in the military, if a general came on to the base, before the general showed up, we had to groom the base so it was immaculate.
[01:10:22.560 --> 01:10:29.560] It could not be a single cigarette butt anywhere. It couldn't be a piece of blade of grass out of place.
[01:10:29.560 --> 01:10:34.560] Everything had to be perfect because everybody's terrified when that general comes on the base.
[01:10:34.560 --> 01:10:42.560] There's only one person they're more afraid of than the general. And that's the civilian.
[01:10:42.560 --> 01:10:53.560] Because the civilian is the only one on the base that can go to the general and crawl down his throat like he was an errant stepchild.
[01:10:53.560 --> 01:11:02.560] And all that general can do is say yes, sir, yes, sir, because the general knows full well who the boss here is.
[01:11:02.560 --> 01:11:11.560] And it's not him. And when you get done chewing out that general, everybody's in trouble.
[01:11:11.560 --> 01:11:15.560] So we use that same strategy.
[01:11:15.560 --> 01:11:24.560] You get some officials that's got an attitude, you get them to display the attitude, and then you walk them up to chain.
[01:11:24.560 --> 01:11:34.560] And depending on how gutsy you are and how much fun you want to have, I can tell you, John, you have not lived.
[01:11:34.560 --> 01:11:45.560] Until you've had some smart mouthed public official give you some trash and you take out the phone and dial 911 and ask somebody to come out and arrest him.
[01:11:45.560 --> 01:11:52.560] Oh, a policeman pulls you over and say one word you don't like.
[01:11:52.560 --> 01:11:58.560] 911, I got this officer out here and he looks like he is terrified of me.
[01:11:58.560 --> 01:12:07.560] And I'm afraid he's going to pull his pistol and shoot me because he's skin so tight, he looks like he's overdosing on anabolic steroids.
[01:12:07.560 --> 01:12:12.560] And if I poked him with a pen, he'd pop like a tick. Could you get somebody out here to get him in control?
[01:12:12.560 --> 01:12:16.560] I did that to a guy in Mansfield, Texas.
[01:12:16.560 --> 01:12:23.560] He was so furious he was visibly shaky.
[01:12:23.560 --> 01:12:27.560] Oh, that was so much fun.
[01:12:27.560 --> 01:12:33.560] Later, he, Ken Magnuson called me and he said, what were you doing in Mansfield yesterday?
[01:12:33.560 --> 01:12:37.560] His brother was the city attorney for Mansfield.
[01:12:37.560 --> 01:12:40.560] I said mind him own business, Ken.
[01:12:40.560 --> 01:12:45.560] Well, my brother said that that officer told him that you were agitated.
[01:12:45.560 --> 01:12:57.560] I said, Kim, ask your brother to ask that officer if I got agitated before I told him to take his chicken suit off or after.
[01:12:57.560 --> 01:13:01.560] You said that to him. I always say that to them.
[01:13:01.560 --> 01:13:06.560] That way they can't accuse me of being agitated.
[01:13:06.560 --> 01:13:14.560] I asked the officer, do something he doesn't want to do, like arrest this official here.
[01:13:14.560 --> 01:13:18.560] And when he refuses, you insist that he take his chicken suit off.
[01:13:18.560 --> 01:13:20.560] Now you're standing there calling him a coward.
[01:13:20.560 --> 01:13:22.560] Right, right.
[01:13:22.560 --> 01:13:30.560] But he's thinking, what's the grand jury going to say when I tell him he told me to take my chicken suit off?
[01:13:30.560 --> 01:13:40.560] I'm always thinking, what will play well before a grand jury of my peers?
[01:13:40.560 --> 01:13:51.560] When you start telling the grand jury what went on, they're immediately going to step into your shoes because they're citizens just like you are.
[01:13:51.560 --> 01:14:09.560] So when you deal with a public official, always put yourself in the shoes of a potential grand jury member and temper anything you would say based on how would a grand jury respond to what I'm about to do.
[01:14:09.560 --> 01:14:22.560] It will always keep you out of trouble and it will put those other guys in a position to where they don't know how to deal with you.
[01:14:22.560 --> 01:14:28.560] I call that the neuro-linguistic programming. It's called a pattern interruption.
[01:14:28.560 --> 01:14:39.560] Now we can do really obvious pattern interruptions but they're more effective if you do a pattern interruption and it's subtle.
[01:14:39.560 --> 01:14:52.560] The best way to do a really effective subtle pattern interruption is when somebody says something or does something and your response just comes out.
[01:14:52.560 --> 01:14:55.560] Whatever you do, don't do it.
[01:14:55.560 --> 01:15:02.560] Because when you get in front of a public official and he's smart mouse you and you feel like telling her how to cow her into cabbage,
[01:15:02.560 --> 01:15:09.560] you've got to know when he was five years old, he knew how to make you smile, frown, happy, sad.
[01:15:09.560 --> 01:15:14.560] He pretty well knew the full range of human response within his native culture.
[01:15:14.560 --> 01:15:31.560] Do you really think he could say something to you that would provoke an angry or frustrated or self-righteous reaction and not know full well he's doing it?
[01:15:31.560 --> 01:15:33.560] Of course he knows.
[01:15:33.560 --> 01:15:37.560] And if you respond to that he is ready for you.
[01:15:37.560 --> 01:15:40.560] He will have a counter-response.
[01:15:40.560 --> 01:15:51.560] And if you don't respond directly to that but catch yourself and you do the next thing that comes to mind instead he's ready for that one too.
[01:15:51.560 --> 01:15:56.560] What you want to do is give him a response he doesn't see coming.
[01:15:56.560 --> 01:16:12.560] One that fits the circumstances that's culturally appropriate, just not what he expects when Roger Jones, Chief Head of the Criminal Section of the Denton County District Attorney's Office told me,
[01:16:12.560 --> 01:16:15.560] Mr. Kelton, you're not welcome here anymore.
[01:16:15.560 --> 01:16:26.560] Now I felt like telling him how to cow away to Cabbage but I pretty well knew how that would end up so what I said instead was, well Mr. Jones,
[01:16:26.560 --> 01:16:28.560] I feel disparaged.
[01:16:28.560 --> 01:16:30.560] You're going to hurt my feelings.
[01:16:30.560 --> 01:16:37.560] Instead they're stopped in his tracks and we're about to go to break it again.
[01:16:37.560 --> 01:16:39.560] I'll tell the rest of that one when I come back.
[01:16:39.560 --> 01:16:40.560] You'll like this one.
[01:16:40.560 --> 01:16:47.560] Randy Kelton, Wheel of Law Radio, our call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:47.560 --> 01:16:49.560] We'll be right back.
[01:16:49.560 --> 01:17:11.560] It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:17:11.560 --> 01:17:15.560] Go to LogosRadionetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:15.560 --> 01:17:18.560] Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:18.560 --> 01:17:24.560] From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR 15.
[01:17:24.560 --> 01:17:27.560] More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:27.560 --> 01:17:33.560] When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:33.560 --> 01:17:37.560] Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:37.560 --> 01:17:42.560] And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:42.560 --> 01:17:51.560] If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[01:17:51.560 --> 01:17:54.560] We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:54.560 --> 01:17:59.560] Go to LogosRadionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:17:59.560 --> 01:18:00.560] I love Logos.
[01:18:00.560 --> 01:18:04.560] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.560 --> 01:18:07.560] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.560 --> 01:18:08.560] I need my truth fix.
[01:18:08.560 --> 01:18:10.560] I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:18:10.560 --> 01:18:13.560] And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.560 --> 01:18:20.560] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.560 --> 01:18:22.560] How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.560 --> 01:18:24.560] Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.560 --> 01:18:29.560] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.560 --> 01:18:31.560] First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.560 --> 01:18:34.560] Now, go to LogosRadionetwork.com.
[01:18:34.560 --> 01:18:37.560] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.560 --> 01:18:43.560] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.560 --> 01:18:44.560] Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.560 --> 01:18:45.560] No.
[01:18:45.560 --> 01:18:47.560] Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.560 --> 01:18:48.560] No.
[01:18:48.560 --> 01:18:49.560] Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.560 --> 01:18:50.560] No.
[01:18:50.560 --> 01:18:51.560] I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.560 --> 01:18:52.560] Wow.
[01:18:52.560 --> 01:18:54.560] Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.560 --> 01:18:55.560] This is perfect.
[01:18:55.560 --> 01:18:56.560] Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.560 --> 01:18:58.560] We are Logos.
[01:18:58.560 --> 01:19:08.560] Happy Holidays, Logos!
[01:19:28.560 --> 01:19:44.560] Okay.
[01:19:44.560 --> 01:19:45.560] We are back.
[01:19:45.560 --> 01:19:48.560] Randy Kelton with Logos Radio.
[01:19:48.560 --> 01:19:56.560] And the point where I'm going here is whatever kind of reaction they're trying to get out of you,
[01:19:56.560 --> 01:19:59.560] don't give it to them.
[01:19:59.560 --> 01:20:00.560] It trips them up.
[01:20:00.560 --> 01:20:04.560] We've got these internal automatic patterns that we run.
[01:20:04.560 --> 01:20:09.560] A lot of times with no conscious awareness that we're doing it.
[01:20:09.560 --> 01:20:17.560] We learn to move around in our environment based on internal mental context.
[01:20:17.560 --> 01:20:27.560] We have these contextual groupings of anger, frustration, empathy.
[01:20:27.560 --> 01:20:33.560] When we feel empathetic, we have all of these things we can do when we're empathetic, when
[01:20:33.560 --> 01:20:34.560] we're angry.
[01:20:34.560 --> 01:20:38.560] We've got this list of things we can do when we're angry.
[01:20:38.560 --> 01:20:42.560] If your parents, when you were growing up, were empathetic and understanding when they
[01:20:42.560 --> 01:20:47.560] were angry, you may actually have that in your angry drawer.
[01:20:47.560 --> 01:20:54.560] But if they weren't, and to the degree that you're not consciously aware of the mental
[01:20:54.560 --> 01:20:59.560] context someone else has just triggered, you don't know what you're doing.
[01:20:59.560 --> 01:21:03.560] You're like a little spider hanging on a piece of web and somebody gives it a little tug
[01:21:03.560 --> 01:21:06.560] and you do this little dance for them.
[01:21:06.560 --> 01:21:12.560] Now, it may seem like you're reading them the right act and letting them know how to coway
[01:21:12.560 --> 01:21:15.560] the cabbage, but that is naive.
[01:21:15.560 --> 01:21:20.560] These guys at the court, they deal with people all day and they deal with people in times
[01:21:20.560 --> 01:21:21.560] of stress.
[01:21:21.560 --> 01:21:27.560] And they learn how to handle people and manipulate them in times of stress.
[01:21:27.560 --> 01:21:32.560] And they get pretty good at predicting behavior.
[01:21:32.560 --> 01:21:40.560] So most of the tools and techniques I talk about, and primarily the stories I tell, they're
[01:21:40.560 --> 01:21:42.560] not just stories.
[01:21:42.560 --> 01:21:53.560] They're true, but they're crafted in a way to install a different behavioral set.
[01:21:53.560 --> 01:22:00.560] Like when I filed criminal charges against the district attorney with his, well, I went
[01:22:00.560 --> 01:22:06.560] to the district attorney's office to get criminal complaints verified by a prosecutor and those
[01:22:06.560 --> 01:22:09.560] complaints were against the prosecutor.
[01:22:09.560 --> 01:22:15.560] And that's why I gave them to a young kid who came out first and he said, I can't take
[01:22:15.560 --> 01:22:16.560] these.
[01:22:16.560 --> 01:22:17.560] It's my boss.
[01:22:17.560 --> 01:22:18.560] I said, what's the matter?
[01:22:18.560 --> 01:22:19.560] Are you chicken?
[01:22:19.560 --> 01:22:20.560] He said, darn right.
[01:22:20.560 --> 01:22:22.560] So I liked that guy.
[01:22:22.560 --> 01:22:26.560] So they send out this Roger Jones and I gave him to him and said, I'm not going to take
[01:22:26.560 --> 01:22:27.560] these.
[01:22:27.560 --> 01:22:30.560] They threw them at me, papers went everywhere.
[01:22:30.560 --> 01:22:33.560] And I said, is there any special reason?
[01:22:33.560 --> 01:22:35.560] Or you just pissed off today.
[01:22:35.560 --> 01:22:37.560] I'm just not going to take them.
[01:22:37.560 --> 01:22:43.560] So I said to the clerk, ma'am, do you have a prosecutor who's literate?
[01:22:43.560 --> 01:22:46.560] She said, huh, you got one who can write.
[01:22:46.560 --> 01:22:51.560] I need one to verify these criminal affidavits in accordance to their duty of arrest of 2.06
[01:22:51.560 --> 01:22:52.560] code criminal procedure.
[01:22:52.560 --> 01:22:57.560] And that's when Roger Jones said, Mr. Calton, you're not welcome here anymore.
[01:22:57.560 --> 01:23:03.560] Then he told me, Mr. Calton, you're creating a disturbance.
[01:23:03.560 --> 01:23:06.560] You're going to have to leave the building.
[01:23:06.560 --> 01:23:10.560] And I knew I shouldn't have done it, but it just couldn't help myself.
[01:23:10.560 --> 01:23:17.560] I said, I'll tell you what, Mr. Jones, if you'll just bend over while pulled that while
[01:23:17.560 --> 01:23:23.560] I had you behind for you, and you and I go back to treat one another like mature and responsible
[01:23:23.560 --> 01:23:24.560] adults.
[01:23:24.560 --> 01:23:28.560] But he just froze in his tracks.
[01:23:28.560 --> 01:23:33.560] He had no response for that.
[01:23:33.560 --> 01:23:35.560] Pattern interruption.
[01:23:35.560 --> 01:23:43.560] He will remember that experience in his conscious awareness till the day he dies.
[01:23:43.560 --> 01:23:47.560] Pattern interruption is extremely powerful.
[01:23:47.560 --> 01:23:52.560] When I ask the clerk to see some records and she tells me I can't see them, I take out
[01:23:52.560 --> 01:23:55.560] my cell phone down 911.
[01:23:55.560 --> 01:24:03.560] It gets real interesting real fast because now they're in a quandary.
[01:24:03.560 --> 01:24:05.560] What do you do now?
[01:24:05.560 --> 01:24:07.560] This guy's just called 911.
[01:24:07.560 --> 01:24:11.560] He's asking somebody to come down and arrest me.
[01:24:11.560 --> 01:24:12.560] What do I say?
[01:24:12.560 --> 01:24:14.560] What do I do?
[01:24:14.560 --> 01:24:16.560] They don't see that coming.
[01:24:16.560 --> 01:24:21.560] And the policeman who comes, he is not going to arrest that other person because he works
[01:24:21.560 --> 01:24:22.560] with him.
[01:24:22.560 --> 01:24:24.560] He knows him.
[01:24:24.560 --> 01:24:30.560] And the problem he has, you call 911 and you're accusing him of a crime.
[01:24:30.560 --> 01:24:36.560] So what happens is you get to see what we call this little chicken dance.
[01:24:36.560 --> 01:24:43.560] The chicken dance is where the officer is shifted from one foot to the other, trying to figure
[01:24:43.560 --> 01:24:55.560] out a way to get himself off this dime, trying to placate you and not arrest his buddy.
[01:24:55.560 --> 01:24:57.560] And we're real amenable.
[01:24:57.560 --> 01:24:59.560] We're easy.
[01:24:59.560 --> 01:25:01.560] You don't want to arrest this person?
[01:25:01.560 --> 01:25:02.560] Okay.
[01:25:02.560 --> 01:25:07.560] Where's the nearest magistrate and you go to the nearest magistrate and file criminal charges
[01:25:07.560 --> 01:25:16.560] against the police officer for shielding from prosecution.
[01:25:16.560 --> 01:25:25.560] He is not going to be a happy camper because now he's got somebody coming after him and
[01:25:25.560 --> 01:25:27.560] he was doing what's right.
[01:25:27.560 --> 01:25:29.560] What he saw was right.
[01:25:29.560 --> 01:25:33.560] He's going to respond with righteous indignation.
[01:25:33.560 --> 01:25:38.560] Not at you, but at the first that he was trying to protect.
[01:25:38.560 --> 01:25:41.560] Is all this making sense, John?
[01:25:41.560 --> 01:25:42.560] Yes.
[01:25:42.560 --> 01:25:43.560] Okay.
[01:25:43.560 --> 01:25:48.560] It's not so much about do this thing or do that thing.
[01:25:48.560 --> 01:25:58.560] It's about a way to hold our minds that makes us essentially immune to these guys.
[01:25:58.560 --> 01:26:03.560] But Tim that I talked about at the beginning of the show, the first couple of times he
[01:26:03.560 --> 01:26:07.560] went to court, he was so nervous he could hardly speak.
[01:26:07.560 --> 01:26:11.560] The last couple of times he was cool.
[01:26:11.560 --> 01:26:12.560] He was collected.
[01:26:12.560 --> 01:26:14.560] They couldn't get to him.
[01:26:14.560 --> 01:26:17.560] They couldn't shake him and the judge tried.
[01:26:17.560 --> 01:26:20.560] Nothing they did got to him.
[01:26:20.560 --> 01:26:26.560] And the time he got done, he said the judge was literally sweating because they're trying
[01:26:26.560 --> 01:26:28.560] to gig him.
[01:26:28.560 --> 01:26:32.560] They're trying to get him to say something or do something they can use against him.
[01:26:32.560 --> 01:26:35.560] And they're doing all this stuff and he's not even nothing.
[01:26:35.560 --> 01:26:39.560] He's given them no response.
[01:26:39.560 --> 01:26:46.560] Once you've done this a time or two, there is one problem that can occur.
[01:26:46.560 --> 01:26:52.560] This can get to be way too much fun.
[01:26:52.560 --> 01:26:57.560] It seems risky, but I hear you say that.
[01:26:57.560 --> 01:27:01.560] It's actually not risky.
[01:27:01.560 --> 01:27:07.560] If you call an officer and ask him to arrest a public official and he says one word to
[01:27:07.560 --> 01:27:17.560] you that you can in any way interpret as a threat no matter how failed, that gets a 9-1-1 call.
[01:27:17.560 --> 01:27:23.560] I call 9-1-1 to have you send an officer out here to protect me against someone who's committing
[01:27:23.560 --> 01:27:25.560] crimes against me.
[01:27:25.560 --> 01:27:27.560] And he's threatening me.
[01:27:27.560 --> 01:27:30.560] He's witness tampering and obstruction of justice.
[01:27:30.560 --> 01:27:33.560] You need to send somebody out here to arrest him.
[01:27:33.560 --> 01:27:35.560] And the worst part is he's carrying a pistol.
[01:27:35.560 --> 01:27:37.560] I'm afraid of this guy.
[01:27:37.560 --> 01:27:40.560] Get somebody out here to arrest him.
[01:27:40.560 --> 01:27:44.560] Now the officers, go ahead.
[01:27:44.560 --> 01:27:48.560] The police are carrying a pistol and wearing some kind of funny costume.
[01:27:48.560 --> 01:27:50.560] They're uniform.
[01:27:50.560 --> 01:27:53.560] The pistol is a big deal.
[01:27:53.560 --> 01:28:00.560] In Texas, we have a statute, 2202 B2A.
[01:28:00.560 --> 01:28:03.560] 2202 is aggravated assault.
[01:28:03.560 --> 01:28:11.560] If a person commits simple assault as defined by 2201 and he is prominently displaying a
[01:28:11.560 --> 01:28:15.560] deadly weapon, that's a felony of the second degree.
[01:28:15.560 --> 01:28:24.560] Unless he is a public official acting under the color or pretense of an official capacity,
[01:28:24.560 --> 01:28:30.560] in which case it is a felony of the first degree.
[01:28:30.560 --> 01:28:40.560] When Texas legislature put pistols on public officials' hips, they laid on an extremely
[01:28:40.560 --> 01:28:42.560] serious liability.
[01:28:42.560 --> 01:28:49.560] They made it clear you better be very, very careful with that pistol.
[01:28:49.560 --> 01:28:55.560] So when a cop gets an attitude with me, the first thing I want to know is I see you're
[01:28:55.560 --> 01:28:57.560] wearing that pistol.
[01:28:57.560 --> 01:28:59.560] Tell me, is that pistol loaded?
[01:28:59.560 --> 01:29:01.560] Now, yes, it is.
[01:29:01.560 --> 01:29:04.560] Are you fixing to pull that pistol on me?
[01:29:04.560 --> 01:29:06.560] And that sets them up.
[01:29:06.560 --> 01:29:10.560] At this time, the cop actually gets it.
[01:29:10.560 --> 01:29:12.560] They realize what was going on.
[01:29:12.560 --> 01:29:16.560] When the district judge threatened me with a bailiff and the bailiff put his hand on my
[01:29:16.560 --> 01:29:20.560] arm and I asked the bailiff if he was going to pull that pistol, the judge backed the
[01:29:20.560 --> 01:29:23.560] bailiff off immediately.
[01:29:23.560 --> 01:29:25.560] Because the judge got it.
[01:29:25.560 --> 01:29:28.560] You know, I'm not reacting the way I'm supposed to.
[01:29:28.560 --> 01:29:30.560] I'm not afraid of this bailiff.
[01:29:30.560 --> 01:29:33.560] I'm asking the bailiff if he's about to kill me.
[01:29:33.560 --> 01:29:37.560] And the judge got it and I filed a first degree felony aggravated assault charges against
[01:29:37.560 --> 01:29:40.560] the judge for assaulting me with the bailiff.
[01:29:40.560 --> 01:29:42.560] And I got that in front of him.
[01:29:42.560 --> 01:29:44.560] But he got out of it.
[01:29:44.560 --> 01:29:46.560] I thought it was extreme.
[01:29:46.560 --> 01:29:48.560] He died.
[01:29:48.560 --> 01:29:52.560] I mean, that was going a little far to get out of that grand jury indictment.
[01:29:52.560 --> 01:29:54.560] Hang on.
[01:29:54.560 --> 01:29:56.560] We'll be right back.
[01:29:56.560 --> 01:30:00.560] We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.560 --> 01:30:02.560] Are you lucky?
[01:30:02.560 --> 01:30:07.560] Researchers say living a charmed life is more about the choices you make than fate.
[01:30:07.560 --> 01:30:11.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with four behaviors that increase your odds
[01:30:11.560 --> 01:30:14.560] of finding a pot of gold at the end of your rainbow.
[01:30:14.560 --> 01:30:16.560] Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:16.560 --> 01:30:20.560] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.560 --> 01:30:25.560] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.560 --> 01:30:26.560] So protect your rights.
[01:30:26.560 --> 01:30:30.560] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.560 --> 01:30:33.560] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.560 --> 01:30:36.560] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:36.560 --> 01:30:40.560] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:40.560 --> 01:30:44.560] Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.560 --> 01:30:48.560] According to psychologist Richard Wiseman, people blessed with good fortune
[01:30:48.560 --> 01:30:51.560] practice four behaviors that set them apart.
[01:30:51.560 --> 01:30:53.560] Lucky people don't wait around for a windfall.
[01:30:53.560 --> 01:30:54.560] They make what happen.
[01:30:54.560 --> 01:30:57.560] They network and keep an eye out for opportunities.
[01:30:57.560 --> 01:30:58.560] Then they act on them.
[01:30:58.560 --> 01:31:01.560] Lucky people develop their intuition and trust their gut feelings.
[01:31:01.560 --> 01:31:04.560] Lucky people expect good things to happen to them.
[01:31:04.560 --> 01:31:08.560] They persist in working toward their goals because they believe in positive outcomes.
[01:31:08.560 --> 01:31:12.560] These expectations become self-fulfilling prophecies.
[01:31:12.560 --> 01:31:15.560] And finally, lucky people turn lemons into lemonade.
[01:31:15.560 --> 01:31:17.560] They don't dwell on setbacks.
[01:31:17.560 --> 01:31:22.560] Rather, they find ways to take control and turn situations around in their favor.
[01:31:22.560 --> 01:31:24.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:24.560 --> 01:31:29.560] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:55.560 --> 01:31:57.560] And we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.560 --> 01:32:00.560] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.560 --> 01:32:02.560] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:02.560 --> 01:32:05.560] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:05.560 --> 01:32:08.560] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails.
[01:32:08.560 --> 01:32:10.560] Good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:10.560 --> 01:32:12.560] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails.
[01:32:12.560 --> 01:32:14.560] But I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.560 --> 01:32:15.560] That's why you have insurance.
[01:32:15.560 --> 01:32:20.560] And Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:20.560 --> 01:32:26.560] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.560 --> 01:32:31.560] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.560 --> 01:32:38.560] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.560 --> 01:32:40.560] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off.
[01:32:40.560 --> 01:32:45.560] And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.560 --> 01:32:49.560] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:49.560 --> 01:32:56.560] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.560 --> 01:32:58.560] Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.560 --> 01:33:00.560] I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:00.560 --> 01:33:24.560] Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:24.560 --> 01:33:31.560] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Logos Radio. And we're talking to John in Michigan.
[01:33:31.560 --> 01:33:37.560] Okay, John, I spent a lot of time on this because this is your first time here.
[01:33:37.560 --> 01:33:45.560] And most of the other guys on the board know about this part because we go over it a lot.
[01:33:45.560 --> 01:33:49.560] But this is kind of the most important thing to understand.
[01:33:49.560 --> 01:33:57.560] I talk about it all a lot and about procedures and stuff you can do with judges and prosecutors.
[01:33:57.560 --> 01:34:04.560] But the most important part is to understand who you are before these courts.
[01:34:04.560 --> 01:34:08.560] Once you got that down, you become a force to be reckoned with.
[01:34:08.560 --> 01:34:16.560] You started out speaking to an issue that you had. Will you go back and address that?
[01:34:16.560 --> 01:34:21.560] Sure, do you mean as far as probable cause or?
[01:34:21.560 --> 01:34:27.560] What did the officer do that caused you to raise this issue?
[01:34:27.560 --> 01:34:33.560] Well, I was pulled over and I didn't really think he had probable cause when I asked him why he stopped me.
[01:34:33.560 --> 01:34:38.560] He said some stuff about how your license plate was crooked and your windshield cracked, you know.
[01:34:38.560 --> 01:34:41.560] And those things don't appear on the ticket.
[01:34:41.560 --> 01:34:48.560] He went beyond that and at the end of my information he said, oh, the computer says your license is suspended.
[01:34:48.560 --> 01:34:57.560] And so, you know, the misdemeanor for driving with license suspended and then other traffic violations, you know, registration.
[01:34:57.560 --> 01:35:01.560] Okay. What does the...
[01:35:01.560 --> 01:35:09.560] Okay, the first question I want to get to, don't go to the merits.
[01:35:09.560 --> 01:35:15.560] They go to who this police officer is and what authority he has.
[01:35:15.560 --> 01:35:21.560] Are you familiar with my traffic site, trafficticket.website?
[01:35:21.560 --> 01:35:24.560] No, I'm not. I haven't heard of that.
[01:35:24.560 --> 01:35:30.560] Go to that site. Somebody said it wasn't working. I'm not sure if it's working right or not.
[01:35:30.560 --> 01:35:40.560] Just go in there and put in all your ticket information and it will dump you down a bunch of documents.
[01:35:40.560 --> 01:35:48.560] It should be set so that it only sends generic documents because some of these are made for Texas.
[01:35:48.560 --> 01:35:57.560] But it will stop your mother hubbard motion, a Brady motion, emotion and lemony.
[01:35:57.560 --> 01:36:03.560] And there's some others in there. Just take all of those, sign them and file them with the court.
[01:36:03.560 --> 01:36:09.560] Check through them and make sure they don't reference Texas law and file them with the court.
[01:36:09.560 --> 01:36:15.560] We will show you some fun things to do.
[01:36:15.560 --> 01:36:23.560] What happens when you file motions in a traffic court? Traffic courts are all about money.
[01:36:23.560 --> 01:36:30.560] They're just trying to collect dollars. So when you file a bunch of motions in the traffic court,
[01:36:30.560 --> 01:36:38.560] we've got Brett from Texas. Brett, are you there?
[01:36:38.560 --> 01:36:40.560] Hello.
[01:36:40.560 --> 01:36:49.560] Hello, Brett. Do you tell John what happens when you file motions in a traffic court?
[01:36:49.560 --> 01:36:53.560] Well, my experience has been that they don't know how to respond.
[01:36:53.560 --> 01:37:00.560] They take a very long time and they respond very inadequately.
[01:37:00.560 --> 01:37:08.560] They only touch on little pieces of something and they can't really address any of the issues you raise.
[01:37:08.560 --> 01:37:12.560] Exactly. And that's because they don't have time.
[01:37:12.560 --> 01:37:20.560] It's all about money. And you drop all these motions on them and they have to pay a lawyer, a prosecutor,
[01:37:20.560 --> 01:37:24.560] or the judge to read and go through all these motions.
[01:37:24.560 --> 01:37:31.560] It costs them more to go through these documents than they can make from the case.
[01:37:31.560 --> 01:37:36.560] So now you become a monetary liability.
[01:37:36.560 --> 01:37:42.560] And like we said earlier, you never win your case because she has a law on the facts on your side.
[01:37:42.560 --> 01:37:46.560] It's all about politics and it's all about the money.
[01:37:46.560 --> 01:37:49.560] And in traffic courts, it's especially about the money.
[01:37:49.560 --> 01:38:03.560] But we got this interesting case law that says a judge has a duty to properly apply the law to the facts.
[01:38:03.560 --> 01:38:11.560] He fails to do so. It is a due process violation subject to extraordinary remedy.
[01:38:11.560 --> 01:38:15.560] An extraordinary remedy means to read a mandamus to the higher court.
[01:38:15.560 --> 01:38:19.560] But it says it is a due process violation.
[01:38:19.560 --> 01:38:29.560] And that goes to some other case law that says you have a right to a fair and honest hearing jurist in the first instance.
[01:38:29.560 --> 01:38:33.560] So when the judge fails to perform a duty he's required to perform,
[01:38:33.560 --> 01:38:39.560] by giving a proper ruling on all of the elements of the document you filed,
[01:38:39.560 --> 01:38:42.560] then you file a criminal against the judge.
[01:38:42.560 --> 01:38:48.560] And when the prosecutor fails to respond to your pleadings and they never do,
[01:38:48.560 --> 01:38:57.560] then we have case law that says all facts claimed in the live pleadings must be rebutted
[01:38:57.560 --> 01:39:04.560] or they stand as formal judicial admission.
[01:39:04.560 --> 01:39:05.560] The prosecutor is going to tell you,
[01:39:05.560 --> 01:39:09.560] well, I don't have any duty to respond to these motions.
[01:39:09.560 --> 01:39:11.560] That's right, you don't.
[01:39:11.560 --> 01:39:16.560] But if you don't, you are subject to the consequences.
[01:39:16.560 --> 01:39:26.560] So the purpose of filing this stack of motions is just to get them to violate more laws so you get to go after them.
[01:39:26.560 --> 01:39:28.560] Right.
[01:39:28.560 --> 01:39:33.560] Go to trafficticket.website, fill in the traffic information,
[01:39:33.560 --> 01:39:37.560] and then pull those documents down and call us next week,
[01:39:37.560 --> 01:39:40.560] and all the ones that don't reference Texas,
[01:39:40.560 --> 01:39:44.560] just sign them and file them with the court.
[01:39:44.560 --> 01:39:46.560] Okay.
[01:39:46.560 --> 01:39:50.560] And then call in next week and we'll talk about those.
[01:39:50.560 --> 01:39:56.560] How does the chicken dance resolve? Did they dismiss to get you to go away or did they just leave you alone next time?
[01:39:56.560 --> 01:39:58.560] Well, they leave you alone next time.
[01:39:58.560 --> 01:40:03.560] They tend to act ignorant and try to fight you,
[01:40:03.560 --> 01:40:07.560] but they're not used to somebody coming after them.
[01:40:07.560 --> 01:40:11.560] They're used to people that they can manipulate and push around.
[01:40:11.560 --> 01:40:17.560] 99.6% of all the people accused of crime make a deal.
[01:40:17.560 --> 01:40:21.560] And they're going to do everything they can to get you to make a deal.
[01:40:21.560 --> 01:40:29.560] And when you go in there and do everything you can to get them to violate a law so you can file against them,
[01:40:29.560 --> 01:40:33.560] Brett, the reason I brought you on is Brett's been fighting them for a while.
[01:40:33.560 --> 01:40:37.560] How is your fight with them going, Brett?
[01:40:37.560 --> 01:40:43.560] Well, it's a lot of work keeping up with all their criminal activity
[01:40:43.560 --> 01:40:47.560] and making sure you file a criminal complaint on all of them.
[01:40:47.560 --> 01:40:49.560] That's a lot of work.
[01:40:49.560 --> 01:40:52.560] Of course, I started out with this one in Plano.
[01:40:52.560 --> 01:40:56.560] I started out at the court.
[01:40:56.560 --> 01:41:00.560] I asked one of the clerks for the facts number and they wouldn't give it to me.
[01:41:00.560 --> 01:41:03.560] They said, are you a lawyer?
[01:41:03.560 --> 01:41:06.560] What makes you think I'm a lawyer?
[01:41:06.560 --> 01:41:08.560] And no, they wouldn't give it to me.
[01:41:08.560 --> 01:41:10.560] They said, well, that's for lawyers only.
[01:41:10.560 --> 01:41:17.560] And I said, well, I said, I want to see that policy because they said it was a matter of court policy.
[01:41:17.560 --> 01:41:20.560] I said, all right, well, I want to see that policy.
[01:41:20.560 --> 01:41:22.560] They wouldn't show me that either.
[01:41:22.560 --> 01:41:25.560] It's their policy to make that into an open record request.
[01:41:25.560 --> 01:41:28.560] I said, I want to see that policy.
[01:41:28.560 --> 01:41:30.560] They got all turned right by themselves.
[01:41:30.560 --> 01:41:32.560] They had the supervisor coming out trying to explain things.
[01:41:32.560 --> 01:41:35.560] And I said, I want to see your policies.
[01:41:35.560 --> 01:41:42.560] That turned real quickly into a criminal complaint against the head judge.
[01:41:42.560 --> 01:41:46.560] I'm sure he didn't like that, especially if it started with the request for a facts number.
[01:41:46.560 --> 01:41:49.560] But that's what he's doing.
[01:41:49.560 --> 01:41:53.560] And that's the perfect kind of thing to go for.
[01:41:53.560 --> 01:42:01.560] I've got three district judges now upset with him because they're in front of the attorney general.
[01:42:01.560 --> 01:42:09.560] All because of a facts number.
[01:42:09.560 --> 01:42:12.560] Does that sound like fun, John?
[01:42:12.560 --> 01:42:14.560] Yes.
[01:42:14.560 --> 01:42:18.560] And once you've done this, you've been through this routine with them.
[01:42:18.560 --> 01:42:29.560] You'll get on that list that says, do not stop this jerk because you're going to make your life miserable.
[01:42:29.560 --> 01:42:33.560] The last ticket I got was in Wise County, Texas.
[01:42:33.560 --> 01:42:37.560] And the sergeant didn't know who I was.
[01:42:37.560 --> 01:42:38.560] He pulled me over.
[01:42:38.560 --> 01:42:41.560] He gets my license and I always identify myself.
[01:42:41.560 --> 01:42:44.560] I don't go through this not identifying myself.
[01:42:44.560 --> 01:42:47.560] It causes too many fights.
[01:42:47.560 --> 01:42:51.560] So he took my license, looked at it and said, Mr. Kelton, you know why I stopped you?
[01:42:51.560 --> 01:42:54.560] I said, no, but I figure you're going to tell me.
[01:42:54.560 --> 01:42:58.560] Well, Mr. Kelton, your registration's expired.
[01:42:58.560 --> 01:43:01.560] I said, only two years.
[01:43:01.560 --> 01:43:03.560] What's the problem?
[01:43:03.560 --> 01:43:08.560] So he wrote, he wrote, he went back to write me a ticket.
[01:43:08.560 --> 01:43:10.560] I dialed 911.
[01:43:10.560 --> 01:43:17.560] That's the dispatch sent somebody out to arrest him for first degree felony aggravated assault.
[01:43:17.560 --> 01:43:21.560] Oh, that was a hoot.
[01:43:21.560 --> 01:43:28.560] He wrote me the ticket and gave it to the wrong justice of the peace.
[01:43:28.560 --> 01:43:40.560] And the justice of the peace won't bring it to court because the county attorney doesn't want me in his courtroom.
[01:43:40.560 --> 01:43:42.560] So it is a fight.
[01:43:42.560 --> 01:43:55.560] And if the charges aren't too terribly serious where you're looking at going to jail or something, then this is the cheapest legal education you'll ever get.
[01:43:55.560 --> 01:43:57.560] Right.
[01:43:57.560 --> 01:44:23.560] You get on with these guys.
[01:44:23.560 --> 01:44:27.560] You know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.560 --> 01:44:30.560] They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.560 --> 01:44:39.560] HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.560 --> 01:44:48.560] Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.560 --> 01:45:01.560] Call 888-910-4367 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempUSA.org.
[01:45:01.560 --> 01:45:04.560] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.560 --> 01:45:08.560] Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:08.560 --> 01:45:16.560] The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:16.560 --> 01:45:19.560] If you don't have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.560 --> 01:45:23.560] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.560 --> 01:45:28.560] Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[01:45:28.560 --> 01:45:34.560] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.560 --> 01:45:43.560] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.560 --> 01:45:52.560] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.560 --> 01:45:56.560] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.560 --> 01:46:24.560] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:24.560 --> 01:46:30.560] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and I ran off to cliff again.
[01:46:30.560 --> 01:46:42.560] Okay, John, have you read the transportation code for Michigan?
[01:46:42.560 --> 01:46:45.560] No.
[01:46:45.560 --> 01:46:54.560] I'm going to suggest you get the transportation code out and not so interested in all the different crimes.
[01:46:54.560 --> 01:46:57.560] I'm interested in the front part.
[01:46:57.560 --> 01:47:08.560] The part that establishes the authority of the code, the part that indicates who can enforce the code and how they can enforce the code.
[01:47:08.560 --> 01:47:14.560] The police just simply never do it right.
[01:47:14.560 --> 01:47:18.560] They just can't seem to help themselves.
[01:47:18.560 --> 01:47:24.560] If there's a right way to do it, they just seem to go out of their way to find another one.
[01:47:24.560 --> 01:47:27.560] So read through the first part of it.
[01:47:27.560 --> 01:47:31.560] Let me kind of explain how the codes came about.
[01:47:31.560 --> 01:47:37.560] Truman gets into office and he was a road builder before he became president.
[01:47:37.560 --> 01:47:41.560] And he was a gas that the number of people died on the highways.
[01:47:41.560 --> 01:47:49.560] This is back in 46, 47, and we're losing 50,000 people a year on the highways.
[01:47:49.560 --> 01:47:52.560] We're not losing much more than that today.
[01:47:52.560 --> 01:47:56.560] And there are over 10 times the vehicles on the roads.
[01:47:56.560 --> 01:48:08.560] And a lot of that was because Truman had got engineers, the Corps of Engineers together, and they designed the interstate highway system.
[01:48:08.560 --> 01:48:15.560] With the on-ramps and cloverleafs to upgrade the design for these faster motor vehicles.
[01:48:15.560 --> 01:48:23.560] Well, they also had the feds put together a transportation code.
[01:48:23.560 --> 01:48:29.560] But we just got out of a war fighting for rights and freedom.
[01:48:29.560 --> 01:48:44.560] The likelihood of him getting a federal transportation code passed was that would restrict the rights of all drivers in the country to somewhere between little and none.
[01:48:44.560 --> 01:48:58.560] So he encouraged the passing of the adoption of the federal transportation code by the states for the purpose of regulating commercial trucks only, commercial traffic only.
[01:48:58.560 --> 01:49:08.560] Because primarily it was the big trucks that were just coming out and they were horribly built and people were getting massacred with them.
[01:49:08.560 --> 01:49:15.560] So they passed the law only to apply to commercial drivers and that they could get through.
[01:49:15.560 --> 01:49:24.560] Then they took the code to the sheriff's and told the sheriff's to have this whole new code for them to enforce and the sheriff's told them go scratch.
[01:49:24.560 --> 01:49:31.560] We don't have funds to enforce that code. You're either going to have to come up with more funds or you're going to have to find some other method.
[01:49:31.560 --> 01:49:44.560] So they found another method. They created state police and set up the state police to strictly enforce the transportation code in Texas.
[01:49:44.560 --> 01:49:54.560] The administrative code that creates the highway patrol says it was created as the Department of Public Safety.
[01:49:54.560 --> 01:50:04.560] It says the Department of Public Safety shall not enforce the criminal laws except at the request of an under direction of local law enforcement.
[01:50:04.560 --> 01:50:19.560] The reason for that is the sheriff is the high law enforcement officer of the county. If the state created the state police and gave them authority to enforce criminal laws,
[01:50:19.560 --> 01:50:34.560] the sheriff would all go ballistic because it violated constitution, preemption doctrine. So they only allowed the highway patrol to enforce transportation code.
[01:50:34.560 --> 01:50:44.560] The sheriff didn't enforce it because he didn't have budget for it. So they didn't authorize the sheriff to enforce it.
[01:50:44.560 --> 01:50:54.560] They didn't authorize the municipal municipalities to enforce it. Now some states have like Georgia, for instance, by producers from Georgia,
[01:50:54.560 --> 01:51:04.560] and in Georgia the legislature has authorized the all certified peace officers to enforce transportation code.
[01:51:04.560 --> 01:51:09.560] But that's not the case in most states. You want to check that.
[01:51:09.560 --> 01:51:17.560] A policeman write me a ticket. We land on here in Texas. We land on him like a ton of bricks.
[01:51:17.560 --> 01:51:27.560] And you've probably got laws similar in Michigan. I haven't researched Michigan traffic law yet, but you're likely to find some gyms in there.
[01:51:27.560 --> 01:51:36.560] The one thing that will surprise you is how many things they're doing wrong.
[01:51:36.560 --> 01:51:44.560] First time I read the penal code and code of criminal procedure for Texas and then looked at the practice I thought,
[01:51:44.560 --> 01:51:55.560] have I stepped through the looking glass? How can the practice be so dramatically different than the code?
[01:51:55.560 --> 01:52:02.560] And I'm an engineer. I read the code as a tech manual. And they're not following the tech manual.
[01:52:02.560 --> 01:52:08.560] After 15 years of research looking for what I missed, it became clear I hadn't missed anything.
[01:52:08.560 --> 01:52:14.560] They really were not following law and you'll find the same thing in Michigan.
[01:52:14.560 --> 01:52:18.560] And then you start taking them on about it. It gets real interesting.
[01:52:18.560 --> 01:52:25.560] A duty to move on, I got a bunch of pre-sets called and read the code and call back in next week.
[01:52:25.560 --> 01:52:33.560] I'd like to discuss how Michigan transportation code is enacted.
[01:52:33.560 --> 01:52:35.560] All right.
[01:52:35.560 --> 01:52:48.560] Thank you, John. Okay. Okay, now we're going to go to Larry in Arizona and get all these things working.
[01:52:48.560 --> 01:52:51.560] There we go. Okay. Hello, Larry.
[01:52:51.560 --> 01:52:53.560] How are you doing, Randy?
[01:52:53.560 --> 01:52:58.560] Doing good. What do you have for us today?
[01:52:58.560 --> 01:53:12.560] Well, I need to figure out what is the proper argument to use to show that private property is not real property.
[01:53:12.560 --> 01:53:22.560] Okay. Real property doesn't go to private or not private. Real property goes to dirt.
[01:53:22.560 --> 01:53:30.560] Personal property goes to items that sit on top of the dirt.
[01:53:30.560 --> 01:53:32.560] Okay.
[01:53:32.560 --> 01:53:33.560] So...
[01:53:33.560 --> 01:53:44.560] Okay, I have a land patent procedure, but the county doesn't want to recognize a land patent as being private property.
[01:53:44.560 --> 01:53:48.560] They want it to be residential property so they can tax you.
[01:53:48.560 --> 01:53:57.560] And file criminal charges against the tax assessor collector and sue him personally.
[01:53:57.560 --> 01:54:03.560] They want to do what they want to do, but they're public officials.
[01:54:03.560 --> 01:54:09.560] They can only do what the law specifically authorizes them to do, so file a criminal against them.
[01:54:09.560 --> 01:54:13.560] Run the routine on them.
[01:54:13.560 --> 01:54:17.560] Nobody does that, so they don't realize how vulnerable they are.
[01:54:17.560 --> 01:54:22.560] And when you start after them, go ahead.
[01:54:22.560 --> 01:54:26.560] Is this a place for a declaratory judgment suit?
[01:54:26.560 --> 01:54:29.560] That's a great one.
[01:54:29.560 --> 01:54:43.560] Make your argument that you hold the land under a land patent and that since the state has no claim, then...
[01:54:43.560 --> 01:54:57.560] We need to think about that. How do we best ask the court to give you a ruling that's relatively simple and straightforward?
[01:54:57.560 --> 01:55:09.560] And that ruling will have the effect of undermining everything that the county is doing without it being clear that that's your purpose.
[01:55:09.560 --> 01:55:12.560] Because the courts are corrupt.
[01:55:12.560 --> 01:55:20.560] And if you ask the court to rule that all you have to do is bring the land patent forward and you never have to pay taxes again,
[01:55:20.560 --> 01:55:22.560] they're not going to care what the law says.
[01:55:22.560 --> 01:55:28.560] They're going to rule in a way that's politically convenient.
[01:55:28.560 --> 01:55:49.560] So how do we craft a question? A negative ruling against will undermine the system to the point that unscrupulous individuals can then take this ruling and use it to their advantage and to the disadvantage of the state.
[01:55:49.560 --> 01:56:03.560] It's a little more complex, but it gives us the more likelihood of coming up with collateral estoppals by rescue Dakota.
[01:56:03.560 --> 01:56:11.560] So what does the law in Arizona say about land patents?
[01:56:11.560 --> 01:56:26.560] You know what, I haven't actually found a lot for Arizona. I've found a lot, you know, from different states and things, and there is very little in the statutes about them.
[01:56:26.560 --> 01:56:41.560] Well, that's okay, because under good faith, and I keep forgetting the other part of that term, you can bring if the Arizona legislature has not addressed an issue.
[01:56:41.560 --> 01:56:49.560] And the issue is essentially the same in Arizona as it is in another state, like land patents.
[01:56:49.560 --> 01:57:10.560] And another state has it, and the state legislature has addressed that issue, then under good faith and, hold on just a second, Brett, good faith in what?
[01:57:10.560 --> 01:57:14.560] Come on, though. It comes to my good faith and proper dealings.
[01:57:14.560 --> 01:57:29.560] There's a term just for that, and that term says that the legislatures of every state trust the legislatures of every other state.
[01:57:29.560 --> 01:57:48.560] So if the legislature of one state has not addressed an issue, but the legislature of another state has addressed that issue, then you can bring the other states' statute into your state.
[01:57:48.560 --> 01:58:05.560] So if you can't find law in Arizona addressing the specific issues, and you can find it from other states, it is not controlling in Arizona, but it is instructional.
[01:58:05.560 --> 01:58:08.560] The valid argument.
[01:58:08.560 --> 01:58:30.560] It's valid, and the judge should take instruction from it while he's not controlled. He has to consider it. And what they're likely to look at is you're likely to get a ruling that will undermine the Corpus Juris.
[01:58:30.560 --> 01:58:49.560] So you want to pick your issue very careful and very focused so that the judge can give you your ruling and not undermine the body of law in Arizona, or not apparently undermine the ability of...
[01:58:49.560 --> 01:59:06.560] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.560 --> 01:59:27.560] Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:27.560 --> 01:59:47.560] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102, or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.560 --> 01:59:59.560] That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.