ROL_2018-06-04_16k.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:29.520] Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22 an ounce.
[00:29.520 --> 00:31.840] Silver $16.68 an ounce.
[00:31.840 --> 00:34.920] Texas Crude $65.51 a barrel.
[00:34.920 --> 00:38.200] Bitcoins at $6,902.19.
[00:38.200 --> 00:41.080] Ethereum at $420.80.
[00:41.080 --> 00:44.000] Bitcoin Cash at $652.90.
[00:44.000 --> 00:55.480] And finally Litecoins at $114.34 a crypto coin.
[00:55.480 --> 00:58.640] Today in history, the year 1968.
[00:58.640 --> 01:02.680] President Lyndon Midjonson signs the Civil Rights Act of 1968,
[01:02.680 --> 01:04.320] which prohibited private businesses
[01:04.320 --> 01:07.040] from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex,
[01:07.040 --> 01:08.600] or national origin.
[01:08.600 --> 01:10.480] It also prohibited unequal application
[01:10.480 --> 01:13.320] of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.320 --> 01:16.800] in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations
[01:16.800 --> 01:18.240] for places of business.
[01:18.240 --> 01:19.080] Today in history.
[01:23.920 --> 01:25.840] In recent news, tensions in Syria
[01:25.840 --> 01:28.160] seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack
[01:28.160 --> 01:30.840] on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead
[01:30.840 --> 01:31.880] and many injured.
[01:31.880 --> 01:33.920] An attack which is being blamed on the democratically
[01:33.920 --> 01:36.600] elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
[01:36.600 --> 01:39.320] by the United States and on Israel by Russia.
[01:39.320 --> 01:42.080] Either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence
[01:42.080 --> 01:43.160] as of yet.
[01:43.160 --> 01:44.880] President Trump tweeted today Wednesday
[01:44.880 --> 01:47.920] that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles
[01:47.920 --> 01:50.000] fired at Syria, get ready, Russia,
[01:50.000 --> 01:52.840] because they will be coming in nice and new and smart.
[01:52.840 --> 01:55.140] Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners
[01:55.140 --> 01:57.480] with a gas-killing animal who kills his people
[01:57.480 --> 01:58.520] and enjoys it.
[01:58.520 --> 02:00.320] Many in the West, including President Trump,
[02:00.320 --> 02:03.800] have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must
[02:03.800 --> 02:06.600] have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:06.600 --> 02:08.120] Syria and Russia, on the other hand,
[02:08.120 --> 02:10.240] have given approval since yesterday
[02:10.240 --> 02:13.040] for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons
[02:13.040 --> 02:15.680] to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[02:15.680 --> 02:18.160] Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support
[02:18.160 --> 02:20.360] during Syria's seven-year civil war,
[02:20.360 --> 02:22.840] a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria
[02:22.840 --> 02:25.680] and anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly
[02:25.680 --> 02:27.680] being funded by Western governments,
[02:27.680 --> 02:30.240] with ISIS being one of the more notorious swimmer groups
[02:30.240 --> 02:32.560] of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.560 --> 02:35.840] No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman
[02:35.840 --> 02:39.080] Maria Zakova posted on Facebook that smart missiles should
[02:39.080 --> 02:42.400] be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[02:42.400 --> 02:44.440] has been fighting terrorists.
[02:44.440 --> 02:46.280] Or is this a trick to destroy all traces
[02:46.280 --> 02:47.760] with a smart missile strike?
[02:47.760 --> 02:49.280] And then there will be no evidence
[02:49.280 --> 02:53.400] for international inspectors to look at.
[02:53.400 --> 02:57.680] This was Kurt Rode with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[03:23.400 --> 03:28.400] People being victimized by criminal cops, Psychopathic predators terrorize the neighborhood blocks
[03:28.400 --> 03:30.900] Equip with pepper spray, mate, cocktails and glass
[03:30.900 --> 03:33.400] They like serial killers acting out subliminal farts
[03:33.400 --> 03:35.900] Forget what you talk, the cops have got a license to kill
[03:35.900 --> 03:38.400] Witnessing intimidation means that they can use it at will
[03:38.400 --> 03:41.400] Code of silence means that the pigs will never let out a squeal
[03:41.400 --> 03:44.400] And if they go to court, they know the judge will make them a deal, for real
[03:44.400 --> 03:47.900] That's why they're stopping me, locking me up and stopping me, confiscating my property
[03:47.900 --> 03:51.900] Talking in my demography, making the poor commodity positive and off of poverty
[03:51.900 --> 03:54.900] And court and policy support, a prison of kind, yeah
[03:54.900 --> 03:57.900] No one makes money when no violence stops, hate and brutality
[03:57.900 --> 04:02.900] Alright folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig
[04:02.900 --> 04:08.900] It is June 4th, 2018. We are live tonight
[04:08.900 --> 04:14.900] Though depending upon how my dinner settles, that may or may not remain true through the entire show
[04:14.900 --> 04:18.900] But we will see. I'm hoping for the best, so y'all please do the same
[04:18.900 --> 04:25.900] That being said, I have got the phones on because I'm going to start taking calls the very next segment
[04:25.900 --> 04:28.900] So I'm going to give you this segment to start getting up on the caller board
[04:28.900 --> 04:32.900] And just FYI, what is going on?
[04:32.900 --> 04:38.900] Last week we had to do an archive because I've got something going on with a shoulder
[04:38.900 --> 04:43.900] That is just some days leaves me with so much pain I can't even see straight
[04:43.900 --> 04:46.900] And last Monday was one of those days
[04:46.900 --> 04:52.900] I've got to somehow or other get the funds together to get an MRI of it so I can figure out what's going on
[04:52.900 --> 04:59.900] But the way healthcare is in this country right now, even on Obamacare, I couldn't afford to go get one of those done
[04:59.900 --> 05:04.900] If I was dying from this, so oh, and I wouldn't anyway, but that's beside the point
[05:04.900 --> 05:11.900] Now, before we get to the point of actually taking calls, let's talk a little bit about the network
[05:11.900 --> 05:16.900] We are still running the fundraiser, we still need your contributions and donations
[05:16.900 --> 05:21.900] Whenever and however much you can and as often as you can
[05:21.900 --> 05:28.900] This is how we stay on the air. Without this, we've got nothing. Without that, you've got nothing from us
[05:28.900 --> 05:35.900] We like to think that what we're doing here contributes to a better way of life for all of us
[05:35.900 --> 05:42.900] We work diligently to bring you good information, reliable information, usable information
[05:42.900 --> 05:52.900] To defend yourself from the status quo system and its everyday attempts to take advantage of all of us
[05:52.900 --> 06:01.900] So without the information that we provide, most of you are going to be at a serious disadvantage in trying to fight back
[06:01.900 --> 06:06.900] You don't know where to find this information. It's not like it's obvious in every case because it isn't
[06:06.900 --> 06:09.900] So it just makes things that more difficult
[06:09.900 --> 06:17.900] So please keep us in your financial thoughts and donations whenever you can
[06:17.900 --> 06:24.900] Like I said, every $25 donated to the network, put your name into the drawing for the gun giveaway that we have
[06:24.900 --> 06:34.900] We've got a really good thing going with the sponsor that every year puts up a really nice gun or something gun related
[06:34.900 --> 06:40.900] Or some other very substantial prize in relation to the fundraiser
[06:40.900 --> 06:48.900] So it's not like you don't stand a chance of getting something good out of this just by being a good Samaritan and providing for us
[06:48.900 --> 06:50.900] Because you do
[06:50.900 --> 06:57.900] And that being said, let me move from the fundraiser to the other thing I've been working on this entire past weekend
[06:57.900 --> 07:09.900] Besides working a little bit on trying to develop a particular siphon to be used in the cycloponic system, I told you all that I was going to be working on here real soon
[07:09.900 --> 07:21.900] I've also spent most of my day, daylight hours writing the perfect sworn criminal statement against the judges of these lower courts
[07:21.900 --> 07:36.900] Basically the way that I've got this written up, it covers almost every single thing that these judges in these lower courts do wrong in every single case
[07:36.900 --> 07:44.900] They do at least one of these things wrong, if not all of these things wrong
[07:44.900 --> 07:57.900] And so what I've written up for a case that I'm working on is a criminal allegation in the form of a sworn statement based upon personal knowledge
[07:57.900 --> 08:11.900] Because you are the individual to whom this is being done and you have access to all the documents and the proceedings and the people involved to know that the statement is true and therefore it's made from personal knowledge
[08:11.900 --> 08:17.900] This is the most effective statement because it is done in the form of a sworn affidavit
[08:17.900 --> 08:22.900] But we are using the language of a criminal complaint
[08:22.900 --> 08:35.900] So when I get this completed I have permission from the individual whose case this is to write a blog article tracking this case from beginning to end
[08:35.900 --> 08:47.900] So in addition to a copy of this complaint which will be up there in Word document form so you'll be able to download it, edit it and use it in your own cases wherever it's fitting
[08:47.900 --> 09:06.900] We're going to put up a copy of the document that this or at least one of the documents that this criminal complaint is based upon which is the letter they send out that they are pretending is a proper summons when it is not
[09:06.900 --> 09:14.900] The document they send out violates Texas law in numerous ways
[09:14.900 --> 09:30.900] And the ways that it violates Texas law and the language used in that document constitutes a criminal offense under the laws of Texas. It is called simulating legal process
[09:30.900 --> 09:46.900] Because a summons that does not comport itself with law as required is not a valid summons therefore it is not validly issued by any court
[09:46.900 --> 10:06.900] Therefore the court that is pretending to issue this is doing so from an illegal capacity which means they are acting outside of the law which brings them wholly within the focus of that statute
[10:06.900 --> 10:22.900] Now at the bottom of this criminal complaint I have also included copies of the several statutes that we are alleging they have committed crimes under so that there is no question about what the statute says at the time that these allegations are being made
[10:22.900 --> 10:32.900] I've even highlighted the portion of the statutes that are applicable to the specific facts relating to the allegation being made that constitutes a valid offense
[10:32.900 --> 10:43.900] So when this document is done we are going to go through the process on how to file it and this is how we are going to do it
[10:43.900 --> 10:53.900] Remember what I told you about doing affidavits you never ever make copies of an affidavit until it has been signed in front of a notary
[10:53.900 --> 11:03.900] Then and only then do you make copies you never have multiple originals of an affidavit this is the same crap Howard Hughes did with his wheels
[11:03.900 --> 11:19.900] Every single wheel that he put out there like 130 some odd different wheels that they found and accounted for each one of those wheels had an original signature of Howard Hughes but none of the signatures were identical
[11:19.900 --> 11:39.900] But they were all verified as being his and not only were these wheels written this way but each wheel was an original which made deciding which one was the right one virtually hell on earth to figure out
[11:39.900 --> 11:52.900] And of course the attorneys love that because they got to probate the estate and bleed it dry for as long as possible while all this is going through litigation so people could argue over who had the valid wheel
[11:52.900 --> 12:03.900] Well we're not going to give ourselves or anyone else a chance to decry that these affidavits are not valid because there's multiple originals therefore they're not the same affidavit
[12:03.900 --> 12:20.900] So always always always one original of an affidavit photocopy the original after it has been done make sure the photocopy is 100% monochrome i.e. black and white
[12:20.900 --> 12:37.900] What I recommend you do is sign the document in blue ink and when you make a photocopy of it the signature then turns black on the photocopy this is how you distinguish the copy from the original ok
[12:37.900 --> 12:47.900] That makes it easy now you know which one you have to file as the original and which ones are copies that you can keep
[12:47.900 --> 12:57.900] Now once you have these copies made you are then going to file them in your meeting with the prosecuting attorney
[12:57.900 --> 13:06.900] Why? Well except when you're in a municipal court in a JP court you're going to file it with the prosecuting attorney
[13:06.900 --> 13:12.900] Why? Because the prosecuting attorney is the county attorney for all intents and purposes
[13:12.900 --> 13:22.900] The county attorney is one of the attorneys authorized by law to accept criminal complaints
[13:22.900 --> 13:28.900] A city attorney is not
[13:28.900 --> 13:37.900] Rule number two do not attempt to file a criminal complaint against a judge with the same freaking judge
[13:37.900 --> 13:46.900] Don't walk into the judge's courtroom that you are naming in the criminal complaint and ask that judge to accept the criminal complaint against themselves
[13:46.900 --> 13:52.900] Why? Two reasons. One, it ain't going to work that way
[13:52.900 --> 14:02.900] Two, it can give the appearance that you are tampering with the court by threatening the judge via the complaint
[14:02.900 --> 14:09.900] Remember what Randy and I have told you this whole time we've been talking about this kind of stuff
[14:09.900 --> 14:18.900] Don't ever say or tell someone what you're going to do, just go get it done
[14:18.900 --> 14:28.900] Why? Because you can't be accused of using it to intimidate if no one even knows you're doing it until it's done
[14:28.900 --> 14:37.900] And you have a right to file a criminal complaint against anyone that you believe is committing a criminal act
[14:37.900 --> 14:40.900] You're protected in that
[14:40.900 --> 14:50.900] But you're not protected when you use it to influence the outcome of a case, which is how they will try to spin it if you do it that way
[14:50.900 --> 15:00.900] So don't either go directly to the county attorney in their office and try to file it there
[15:00.900 --> 15:12.900] Or go to some court other than the one in which the judge you are complaining about is sitting and try to file it before the magistrate there
[15:12.900 --> 15:21.900] If no one at these levels will accept that complaint, then the next place it goes is to the grand jury
[15:21.900 --> 15:35.900] And you can send it certified mail return receipt requested to the foreman of the grand jury or you can hand deliver it to the foreman of the grand jury yourself by going to wherever the grand jury has been put together to meet
[15:35.900 --> 15:38.900] Okay?
[15:38.900 --> 15:52.900] Now that being said, this covers a lot of things. It covers four major criminal allegations, simulating legal process, tampering with a governmental record, official oppression, and abuse of official capacity
[15:52.900 --> 16:06.900] And we have the statutes already set out that shows exactly how the statement of facts proves or at least alleges that particular crime was committed by the judge
[16:06.900 --> 16:14.900] And like I say, it's almost a certainty that the judge is going to commit at least one of these if not all of these
[16:14.900 --> 16:25.900] If they commit less than three of these, I will be surprised because all they have to do is commit the simulating legal process or tampering with a governmental record
[16:25.900 --> 16:38.900] And they are automatically guilty of official oppression and abuse of official capacity under the requisites of those statutes because they are acting under the color of their official authority to commit those two original crimes
[16:38.900 --> 16:42.900] These two crimes kick in because of that
[16:42.900 --> 16:51.900] So this one is going to be something to watch to see how it works because it should work just how it ought to work
[16:51.900 --> 16:56.900] Alright folks, y'all hang on and we'll be right back after this break
[17:21.900 --> 17:24.900] For grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15
[17:24.900 --> 17:27.900] More prizes and sponsors to be announced
[17:27.900 --> 17:33.900] When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win
[17:33.900 --> 17:37.900] Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win
[17:37.900 --> 17:42.900] And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win
[17:42.900 --> 17:51.900] If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today
[17:51.900 --> 17:54.900] We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies
[17:54.900 --> 17:59.900] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today
[17:59.900 --> 18:05.900] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[18:05.900 --> 18:14.900] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares Proven Method. Michael Meares has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too
[18:14.900 --> 18:20.900] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[18:20.900 --> 18:24.900] What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons
[18:24.900 --> 18:26.900] How to answer letters and phone calls
[18:26.900 --> 18:29.900] How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports
[18:29.900 --> 18:33.900] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[18:33.900 --> 18:38.900] The Michael Meares Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[18:38.900 --> 18:40.900] Personal consultation is available as well
[18:40.900 --> 18:46.900] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner
[18:46.900 --> 18:49.900] Or email MichaelMeares at yahoo.com
[18:49.900 --> 18:51.900] That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:51.900 --> 18:57.900] Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.900 --> 19:00.900] To learn how to stop debt collectors next
[19:00.900 --> 19:05.900] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:05.900 --> 19:31.900] from the Logos Radio Network at yahoo.com
[19:35.900 --> 19:40.900] The Logos Radio Network
[19:40.900 --> 19:46.900] is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[19:46.900 --> 19:51.900] Personal consultation is available as well
[19:51.900 --> 19:55.900] For more information, please visit www.logos.com
[19:55.900 --> 20:05.900] www.logos.com
[20:25.900 --> 20:34.900] All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio.
[20:34.900 --> 20:39.900] The call in number is 512-646-1984
[20:39.900 --> 20:41.900] If you want to call in and get in line.
[20:41.900 --> 20:43.900] Excuse me.
[20:43.900 --> 20:47.900] I don't know how many people are actually going to be out there listening tonight
[20:47.900 --> 20:50.900] As I did not get the chance to put up an event on Facebook today
[20:50.900 --> 20:53.900] I've been concentrating so hard on this criminal complaint
[20:53.900 --> 20:55.900] I hadn't even thought to get that far today
[20:55.900 --> 20:57.900] So that's my bad in that regard
[20:57.900 --> 21:01.900] Generally a lot of our listening audience comes from the announcement on Facebook
[21:01.900 --> 21:06.900] So hopefully somebody will tune in just to check and see if the show is going on
[21:06.900 --> 21:11.900] Until I'm able to, on one of the breaks, post an event to let them know that we are on the air
[21:11.900 --> 21:16.900] That being said, we do have a caller up on the board
[21:16.900 --> 21:19.900] It appears to be Truth Rader in Oregon
[21:19.900 --> 21:21.900] So let's see what he's got to say
[21:21.900 --> 21:23.900] Rader, what can we do for you?
[21:23.900 --> 21:25.900] Good evening, Eddie
[21:25.900 --> 21:29.900] When we last spoke on there on February 19, 2018
[21:29.900 --> 21:32.900] I told you that it would be a good idea to implement those
[21:32.900 --> 21:35.900] Divide methods into your seminar material
[21:35.900 --> 21:39.900] Or any of your other methods in going into the court
[21:39.900 --> 21:43.900] And you said, well, I invite you to go ahead and do that
[21:43.900 --> 21:45.900] And let me know how it turns out for you
[21:45.900 --> 21:48.900] And they don't put you in the mental institution
[21:48.900 --> 21:52.900] I don't recall saying anything about the mental institution, but okay
[21:52.900 --> 21:56.900] Yeah, I was starting to call and said, well, if you go on the stuff about God and all this stuff like that
[21:56.900 --> 21:58.900] There's a libel of
[21:58.900 --> 22:02.900] I put you in a mental institution
[22:04.900 --> 22:06.900] Okay
[22:06.900 --> 22:08.900] Well, having said that
[22:08.900 --> 22:12.900] I have a victory that I wanted to announce
[22:12.900 --> 22:13.900] Okay
[22:13.900 --> 22:18.900] And this victory was from...
[22:18.900 --> 22:20.900] It sent me from the traffic stop on March 18, 2018
[22:20.900 --> 22:23.900] Even here in my city of Milwaukee
[22:23.900 --> 22:25.900] And we went to court on this
[22:25.900 --> 22:27.900] On June...
[22:27.900 --> 22:29.900] Excuse me, they hear properly
[22:29.900 --> 22:32.900] May 23, 2018, that's so many of them
[22:32.900 --> 22:35.900] May 23, 2018
[22:35.900 --> 22:40.900] And what I did prior to going to that
[22:40.900 --> 22:42.900] Court, Bench trial, whatever you want to call it
[22:42.900 --> 22:45.900] Tribunal, I did file all the things I needed to file
[22:45.900 --> 22:48.900] Contagent transportation
[22:48.900 --> 22:49.900] The...
[22:49.900 --> 22:51.900] Is it the affidavit or all the ones I need?
[22:51.900 --> 22:54.900] Declination depleting, of course
[22:54.900 --> 22:57.900] Motion to dismiss the prejudice
[22:57.900 --> 23:00.900] And the seven interrogatories
[23:00.900 --> 23:03.900] As you refer to as the seven deadly sins
[23:03.900 --> 23:05.900] Well, they're not the same thing
[23:05.900 --> 23:09.900] The seven interrogatories have to do with civil infractions
[23:09.900 --> 23:12.900] The deadly sins are something else
[23:12.900 --> 23:15.900] They are specific terms defined by statute
[23:15.900 --> 23:17.900] Okay
[23:17.900 --> 23:20.900] Dan went to court
[23:20.900 --> 23:22.900] First thing of the day, I said a prayer to myself
[23:22.900 --> 23:25.900] Before I went into the court, please speak to me
[23:25.900 --> 23:26.900] Relax me
[23:26.900 --> 23:29.900] Take away the nervousness, take away the fear
[23:29.900 --> 23:32.900] Because that fear is not...
[23:32.900 --> 23:34.900] It's not a...
[23:34.900 --> 23:36.900] Including normal fear, that's a fear
[23:36.900 --> 23:39.900] Because it's very evil, more or less
[23:39.900 --> 23:42.900] So when I went in there, when I was in the court
[23:42.900 --> 23:44.900] The judge is a very...
[23:44.900 --> 23:46.900] I see a very friendly judge, he's not a judge duty
[23:46.900 --> 23:48.900] So that's a good thing
[23:48.900 --> 23:50.900] He's a very young judge
[23:50.900 --> 23:52.900] Only in the early 30s
[23:52.900 --> 23:54.900] And I explained a whole bunch of stuff
[23:54.900 --> 23:56.900] I won't get into all the details, but I did
[23:56.900 --> 23:57.900] I'm trying to make it pretty reasonable
[23:57.900 --> 24:00.900] Are we talking about a court case or a dating profile?
[24:00.900 --> 24:03.900] It sounds like it, but...
[24:03.900 --> 24:06.900] I know that I think I'm a little bit fortunate
[24:06.900 --> 24:09.900] That I have a judge that has somewhat of a...
[24:09.900 --> 24:11.900] I guess you'd say a spirit or something like that
[24:11.900 --> 24:13.900] And it seems to be a...
[24:13.900 --> 24:16.900] That she seems to be a nice judge
[24:16.900 --> 24:19.900] But she's not generous, but that way
[24:19.900 --> 24:21.900] Okay
[24:21.900 --> 24:22.900] Friendly
[24:22.900 --> 24:23.900] Point being?
[24:23.900 --> 24:25.900] But she's not generous
[24:25.900 --> 24:27.900] Now, she can throw all the information
[24:27.900 --> 24:30.900] Because she convicted me seven previous times
[24:30.900 --> 24:33.900] Seven convictions for her in her same court form
[24:33.900 --> 24:36.900] But this time, there was a...
[24:36.900 --> 24:38.900] When I put all these interrogatories
[24:38.900 --> 24:40.900] She didn't read them in the court, but she looked at them
[24:40.900 --> 24:42.900] And considered them
[24:42.900 --> 24:44.900] I brought up many different cases
[24:44.900 --> 24:46.900] Concerning this...
[24:46.900 --> 24:48.900] Concerning the right liberty to locomotion
[24:48.900 --> 24:50.900] And there's an interesting video
[24:50.900 --> 24:52.900] That I touched upon
[24:52.900 --> 24:55.900] That's particular to Oregon
[24:55.900 --> 24:57.900] It's a nine-minute video
[24:57.900 --> 24:59.900] And it describes the government
[24:59.900 --> 25:01.900] The Oregon law enforcement
[25:01.900 --> 25:03.900] Is acting in broad
[25:03.900 --> 25:06.900] Because it has been deceived by a tricky lawyer
[25:06.900 --> 25:10.900] And I explained what they did to...
[25:10.900 --> 25:11.900] How would you call it?
[25:11.900 --> 25:13.900] To alter
[25:13.900 --> 25:16.900] Alter what is said in the Constitution
[25:16.900 --> 25:21.900] In order to apply all the statutory codes
[25:21.900 --> 25:23.900] In the vehicle code special section
[25:23.900 --> 25:26.900] That's in there for commercial use only
[25:26.900 --> 25:29.900] And it's something to change it
[25:29.900 --> 25:31.900] In order to make it a Peter
[25:31.900 --> 25:34.900] That it applies to all of us
[25:34.900 --> 25:36.900] Okay?
[25:36.900 --> 25:38.900] And I just wanted to know
[25:38.900 --> 25:40.900] Is this a civil infraction
[25:40.900 --> 25:43.900] Or is this a criminal charge?
[25:43.900 --> 25:46.900] And I mainly
[25:46.900 --> 25:49.900] Made my questions specific to
[25:49.900 --> 25:51.900] Where did the officer have
[25:51.900 --> 25:54.900] To be able to seize me at my liberty
[25:54.900 --> 25:56.900] Without a probable cause
[25:56.900 --> 25:58.900] Without a probable cause
[25:58.900 --> 26:00.900] So where was the articable probable cause?
[26:00.900 --> 26:02.900] So the officer had reason to believe
[26:02.900 --> 26:06.900] That it was a criminal act with a foot
[26:06.900 --> 26:08.900] But it over and over again
[26:08.900 --> 26:09.900] Okay?
[26:09.900 --> 26:12.900] And what did the judge rule in relation to that?
[26:12.900 --> 26:15.900] Well...
[26:15.900 --> 26:17.900] I think as far as I recall
[26:17.900 --> 26:19.900] It's going to be on the DVD
[26:19.900 --> 26:21.900] But it's on the CD when I get to the court
[26:21.900 --> 26:23.900] So I have to review it
[26:23.900 --> 26:25.900] But she's...
[26:25.900 --> 26:27.900] How did she say?
[26:27.900 --> 26:30.900] She pretty much didn't have much of a ruling to that
[26:30.900 --> 26:32.900] You know...
[26:32.900 --> 26:34.900] So what did she rule?
[26:34.900 --> 26:36.900] You know, I'm going to go ahead
[26:36.900 --> 26:38.900] And we're going to go ahead and...
[26:38.900 --> 26:39.900] I don't know if she can do this
[26:39.900 --> 26:40.900] Luckily or not
[26:40.900 --> 26:42.900] But she said she's going to have her decision
[26:42.900 --> 26:44.900] In the mail for me
[26:47.900 --> 26:49.900] So I don't know if that's something that's permitted to do
[26:49.900 --> 26:50.900] You said you had...
[26:50.900 --> 26:52.900] When you called me earlier today
[26:52.900 --> 26:54.900] You said you had a letter stating
[26:54.900 --> 26:55.900] That they had dismissed the case
[26:55.900 --> 26:58.900] Does it not tell you anything about why?
[26:58.900 --> 27:01.900] Okay, let me take a look here
[27:01.900 --> 27:04.900] This is what she says
[27:04.900 --> 27:06.900] The judgment of the judgment
[27:06.900 --> 27:07.900] Is mentioned in this case
[27:07.900 --> 27:10.900] The judge has found you not guilty of the charge
[27:10.900 --> 27:12.900] I don't know if this is a good thing or not
[27:12.900 --> 27:15.900] I mean, I want to have the case dismissed
[27:15.900 --> 27:17.900] With prejudice because they didn't have
[27:17.900 --> 27:19.900] Subject matter jurisdiction
[27:19.900 --> 27:21.900] That's what I was hoping to get
[27:21.900 --> 27:23.900] So being found not guilty
[27:23.900 --> 27:26.900] Does that still keep being in their jurisdiction
[27:26.900 --> 27:28.900] Or not?
[27:28.900 --> 27:30.900] It depends on whether or not you were at trial
[27:30.900 --> 27:32.900] Or about the intertrial
[27:32.900 --> 27:34.900] And Jeopardy had already attached
[27:34.900 --> 27:37.900] If Jeopardy has attached that they'd dismissed
[27:37.900 --> 27:39.900] Then it's with prejudice regardless
[27:39.900 --> 27:42.900] If it's without Jeopardy attaching
[27:42.900 --> 27:43.900] Then they can bring it back
[27:43.900 --> 27:46.900] Unless it was dismissed with prejudice
[27:46.900 --> 27:49.900] Okay, yeah, that's all I got for the judge
[27:49.900 --> 27:51.900] I found me not guilty of the charge
[27:51.900 --> 27:53.900] Also the judge investigated
[27:53.900 --> 27:56.900] Okay, not guilty is not a dismissal
[27:56.900 --> 28:00.900] That's a ruling, that's a final disposition
[28:00.900 --> 28:02.900] Okay
[28:02.900 --> 28:05.900] Okay, therefore not guilty
[28:05.900 --> 28:07.900] Is a decision in your favor
[28:07.900 --> 28:11.900] For which you can sue for malicious prosecution
[28:11.900 --> 28:13.900] Okay
[28:13.900 --> 28:16.900] And you mentioned some time years in the past
[28:16.900 --> 28:19.900] Any time that that court in the past
[28:19.900 --> 28:22.900] Has convicted you of any of those
[28:22.900 --> 28:24.900] You can now go back and have those overturned
[28:24.900 --> 28:27.900] No, I didn't say that either
[28:27.900 --> 28:29.900] Whether or not you can have them overturned
[28:29.900 --> 28:32.900] Is dependent upon whether or not you can show
[28:32.900 --> 28:34.900] That all previous convictions were based upon
[28:34.900 --> 28:37.900] The same pertinent facts and arguments
[28:37.900 --> 28:42.900] If they convicted you of 7 or 20 or 50
[28:42.900 --> 28:45.900] And then suddenly chased their mind on one
[28:45.900 --> 28:50.900] And you did all 51 of them exactly the same way
[28:50.900 --> 28:55.900] Then you can call the prior rulings into question
[28:55.900 --> 28:58.900] All right
[29:01.900 --> 29:03.900] Okay, well I have the letters here
[29:03.900 --> 29:04.900] You want me to read anything more about it
[29:04.900 --> 29:07.900] I can read them to you or I can e-letter them to you
[29:07.900 --> 29:12.900] How are they pertinent to the ruling?
[29:12.900 --> 29:16.900] Let's see, she just described a couple of cases
[29:16.900 --> 29:19.900] In here that she said
[29:19.900 --> 29:21.900] Describe them for what purpose?
[29:21.900 --> 29:25.900] She says she's just looking into this
[29:25.900 --> 29:28.900] But anyway, it says as discussed in court
[29:28.900 --> 29:30.900] In the following, the right of locomotion
[29:30.900 --> 29:32.900] Is not included anywhere in the U.S. constitutional
[29:32.900 --> 29:35.900] Or bill of rights, what she said
[29:35.900 --> 29:38.900] Except that the Supreme Court says it is
[29:38.900 --> 29:41.900] It's not specific language
[29:41.900 --> 29:45.900] But the implication of it does exist
[29:45.900 --> 29:47.900] Anyway, hang on just a minute
[29:47.900 --> 29:49.900] We've got a break to take and then we'll be right back
[29:49.900 --> 29:52.900] All right folks, this is Rule of Law Radio
[29:52.900 --> 29:55.900] The calling number is 512-646-1984
[29:55.900 --> 29:57.900] Y'all hang in there, we will be right back
[30:00.900 --> 30:02.900] Are you lucky?
[30:02.900 --> 30:04.900] Researchers say living a charmed life
[30:04.900 --> 30:06.900] Is more about the choices you make than fate
[30:06.900 --> 30:08.900] I'm Dr. Catherine Albright
[30:08.900 --> 30:10.900] And I'll be back with four behaviors
[30:10.900 --> 30:12.900] To increase your odds of finding a pot of gold
[30:12.900 --> 30:41.900] At the end of your rainbow
[30:43.900 --> 30:46.900] According to psychologist Richard Wiseman
[30:46.900 --> 30:47.900] People blessed with good fortune
[30:47.900 --> 30:50.900] Practice four behaviors that set them apart
[30:50.900 --> 30:52.900] Lucky people don't wait around for a windfall
[30:52.900 --> 30:54.900] They make what happen
[30:54.900 --> 30:56.900] They network and keep an eye out for opportunities
[30:56.900 --> 30:58.900] Then they act on them
[30:58.900 --> 30:59.900] Lucky people develop their intuition
[30:59.900 --> 31:01.900] And trust their gut feelings
[31:01.900 --> 31:04.900] Lucky people expect good things to happen to them
[31:04.900 --> 31:06.900] They persist in working toward their goals
[31:06.900 --> 31:08.900] Because they believe in positive outcomes
[31:08.900 --> 31:11.900] These expectations become self-fulfilling prophecies
[31:11.900 --> 31:14.900] And finally, lucky people turn lemons into lemonade
[31:14.900 --> 31:16.900] They don't dwell in setbacks
[31:16.900 --> 31:18.900] Rather, they find ways to take control
[31:18.900 --> 31:21.900] And turn situations around in their favor
[31:21.900 --> 31:23.900] I'm Dr. Catherine Albright
[31:23.900 --> 31:26.900] More news and information at CatherineAlbright.com
[31:29.900 --> 31:30.900] This is Building 7
[31:30.900 --> 31:32.900] A 47-story skyscraper
[31:32.900 --> 31:34.900] That fell on the afternoon of September 11
[31:34.900 --> 31:36.900] The government says that fire brought it down
[31:36.900 --> 31:39.900] However, 1,500 architects and engineers
[31:39.900 --> 31:42.900] have concluded it was a controlled demolition
[31:42.900 --> 31:44.900] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members
[31:44.900 --> 31:45.900] have given their lives
[31:45.900 --> 31:47.900] And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying
[31:47.900 --> 31:49.900] I'm not a conspiracy theorist
[31:49.900 --> 31:50.900] I'm a structural engineer
[31:50.900 --> 31:51.900] I'm a New York City correctional
[31:51.900 --> 31:52.900] I'm an Air Force pilot
[31:52.900 --> 31:54.900] I'm a father who lost his son
[31:54.900 --> 31:55.900] We're Americans
[31:55.900 --> 31:56.900] And we deserve the truth
[31:56.900 --> 31:59.900] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[32:01.900 --> 32:04.900] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[32:04.900 --> 32:06.900] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society
[32:06.900 --> 32:09.900] And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society
[32:09.900 --> 32:11.900] Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[32:11.900 --> 32:14.900] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[32:14.900 --> 32:16.900] The right to act in our own private capacity
[32:16.900 --> 32:18.900] And most importantly, the right to due process of law
[32:18.900 --> 32:21.900] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:21.900 --> 32:24.900] To learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[32:24.900 --> 32:26.900] Former Sheriff's deputy, A. Craig
[32:26.900 --> 32:27.900] In conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[32:27.900 --> 32:30.900] Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:30.900 --> 32:32.900] That will help you understand what due process is
[32:32.900 --> 32:34.900] And how to hold your courts to the rule of law
[32:34.900 --> 32:36.900] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:36.900 --> 32:38.900] By going to RuleofLawRadio.com
[32:38.900 --> 32:40.900] And ordering your copy today
[32:40.900 --> 32:42.900] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[32:42.900 --> 32:43.900] The Texas Transportation Code
[32:43.900 --> 32:44.900] The Law vs. the Lie
[32:44.900 --> 32:47.900] Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[32:47.900 --> 32:50.900] Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[32:50.900 --> 32:51.900] Learn how to fight for your rights
[32:51.900 --> 32:54.900] With the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com
[32:54.900 --> 32:56.900] Order your copy today and together we can have
[32:56.900 --> 32:58.900] The free society we all want and deserve
[33:01.900 --> 33:03.900] Live Free Speech Radio
[33:03.900 --> 33:05.900] LogosRadionetwork.com
[33:33.900 --> 33:35.900] All right folks, we are back
[33:35.900 --> 33:37.900] This is Rule of Law Radio
[33:37.900 --> 33:40.900] The call in number is 512-646-1984
[33:40.900 --> 33:42.900] Angel, Ralph, I do see you on the call board
[33:42.900 --> 33:45.900] So y'all please bear with me while I finish up
[33:45.900 --> 33:47.900] With Truth Raider here
[33:47.900 --> 33:49.900] All right Raider, let's get this wrapped up
[33:49.900 --> 33:52.900] Okay, I also use your voice in the core
[33:52.900 --> 33:54.900] Recorded version of your voice
[33:54.900 --> 33:55.900] I also
[33:55.900 --> 33:56.900] I also
[33:56.900 --> 33:57.900] I also
[33:57.900 --> 34:03.900] You had a recording that we spoke about civil infractions
[34:03.900 --> 34:05.900] And he said this is all you have to do
[34:05.900 --> 34:08.900] There can be no articulable problem caused procedure
[34:08.900 --> 34:12.900] Of one's liberty by an officer for a civil infraction
[34:12.900 --> 34:15.900] What are you doing dude?
[34:15.900 --> 34:18.900] That was a question for the police officer
[34:18.900 --> 34:19.900] Yeah
[34:19.900 --> 34:21.900] So that's embarrassing
[34:22.900 --> 34:24.900] The officer didn't know what to say
[34:24.900 --> 34:27.900] The officer didn't know what to say
[34:27.900 --> 34:30.900] Across the time, you know, the
[34:30.900 --> 34:32.900] Did you make this decision yourself?
[34:32.900 --> 34:34.900] Did somebody else tell you to do this?
[34:34.900 --> 34:36.900] And he said I'm on for the record
[34:36.900 --> 34:38.900] That he didn't insist to stop me
[34:39.900 --> 34:40.900] Right
[34:40.900 --> 34:43.900] Based upon no articulable probable cause
[34:43.900 --> 34:44.900] Right
[34:46.900 --> 34:47.900] Right, exactly
[34:47.900 --> 34:48.900] So I have the letter here
[34:48.900 --> 34:51.900] And I'll just do an overview
[34:51.900 --> 34:53.900] I won't read it word for word
[34:53.900 --> 34:57.900] But she was bringing up Plessy versus Burgesson
[34:57.900 --> 35:01.900] As an example for the white liberty locomotion
[35:01.900 --> 35:03.900] And it's an 1896 ruling
[35:03.900 --> 35:06.900] As for or against?
[35:06.900 --> 35:09.900] I guess that she was trying to find a parallel
[35:09.900 --> 35:12.900] Or something that would be for it
[35:12.900 --> 35:14.900] And this is all she could find
[35:14.900 --> 35:16.900] But there are case laws that I understand
[35:16.900 --> 35:19.900] That there's as many as 3,000 of the cases
[35:19.900 --> 35:21.900] That are similar to mine
[35:21.900 --> 35:24.900] Well, you have to remember that they do not read
[35:24.900 --> 35:27.900] The terms in those cases
[35:27.900 --> 35:32.900] In consideration of the statute versus common usage
[35:32.900 --> 35:36.900] They are reading it in the context of the statute
[35:36.900 --> 35:39.900] But they're trying to apply it as if it's common to all
[35:39.900 --> 35:42.900] Rather than the special class of persons
[35:42.900 --> 35:45.900] For which the statute was written
[35:45.900 --> 35:48.900] That's where they always screw this up
[35:48.900 --> 35:51.900] They are taking a statutory scheme
[35:51.900 --> 35:55.900] That is directed at a special class of legal persons
[35:55.900 --> 35:59.900] And attempting to massage it into an application
[35:59.900 --> 36:02.900] To the general public
[36:02.900 --> 36:06.900] And that is not how it works
[36:06.900 --> 36:09.900] No, because it seems to be irrelevant
[36:09.900 --> 36:12.900] It doesn't seem to be on a parallel with what I'm doing
[36:12.900 --> 36:17.900] Well, email me the citations to the cases that she used
[36:17.900 --> 36:19.900] Okay
[36:19.900 --> 36:21.900] But in any case, so that's it
[36:21.900 --> 36:27.900] You cross-examined the cop and the court ruled not guilty
[36:27.900 --> 36:30.900] Correct, in the mail she didn't have her decision by the day
[36:30.900 --> 36:33.900] But she said it's me that got it last week
[36:33.900 --> 36:35.900] Okay
[36:35.900 --> 36:38.900] And that's it, so you can put it on your blog once again
[36:38.900 --> 36:39.900] We win another one
[36:39.900 --> 36:42.900] All right, well, if you give me the proper documentation
[36:42.900 --> 36:45.900] Showing that it was a win and a dismissal
[36:45.900 --> 36:48.900] Then we will go from there and do that
[36:48.900 --> 36:50.900] Well, that's a finding of not guilty
[36:50.900 --> 36:52.900] That's what I'm thinking
[36:52.900 --> 36:54.900] Either way, the charges are gone
[36:54.900 --> 36:55.900] That's all we're worried about
[36:55.900 --> 36:57.900] It's a final disposition in your favor
[36:57.900 --> 36:59.900] That's all we're worried about
[36:59.900 --> 37:02.900] And now does Jeopardy attach at that point?
[37:02.900 --> 37:05.900] Well, if you were actually cross-examining the cop
[37:05.900 --> 37:09.900] That would have to be during trial, wouldn't it?
[37:09.900 --> 37:10.900] Right
[37:10.900 --> 37:13.900] So if you're at trial, I'm pretty sure Jeopardy has attached
[37:13.900 --> 37:15.900] At that point
[37:15.900 --> 37:18.900] Okay, and therefore through the Poison Tree Doctrine
[37:18.900 --> 37:20.900] It's so expensive
[37:20.900 --> 37:23.900] Well, again, the court
[37:23.900 --> 37:25.900] So far you haven't given me anything to show
[37:25.900 --> 37:29.900] That the court relied upon through the Poison Tree Doctrine
[37:29.900 --> 37:30.900] Yes
[37:30.900 --> 37:33.900] The court could have very well just simply have stated
[37:33.900 --> 37:35.900] The initial stop was illegal
[37:35.900 --> 37:38.900] End of story, we don't have to go any further
[37:38.900 --> 37:41.900] Okay, plain and simple
[37:41.900 --> 37:43.900] All right, then
[37:43.900 --> 37:47.900] I could choose to litigate for damages
[37:47.900 --> 37:49.900] For the...
[37:49.900 --> 37:50.900] There's another case coming up in August
[37:50.900 --> 37:52.900] I think it might go the same way too
[37:52.900 --> 37:53.900] It was for a February stop
[37:53.900 --> 37:57.900] Where the different officer gets to use my property
[37:57.900 --> 38:00.900] But it took two months and they decided to refund
[38:00.900 --> 38:03.900] The impound fees and the release fees
[38:03.900 --> 38:05.900] But they did some
[38:05.900 --> 38:12.900] Same-city, different case stuff
[38:12.900 --> 38:13.900] Okay
[38:13.900 --> 38:15.900] All right
[38:15.900 --> 38:17.900] So that's not going to be held till August of 6
[38:17.900 --> 38:18.900] So I'll let you know the disposition
[38:18.900 --> 38:22.900] And the result of that too as well
[38:22.900 --> 38:23.900] All right
[38:23.900 --> 38:25.900] All right
[38:25.900 --> 38:26.900] Well, there you go
[38:26.900 --> 38:27.900] That's what I got for you tonight
[38:27.900 --> 38:29.900] Okay, thanks for calling in
[38:29.900 --> 38:30.900] You bet
[38:30.900 --> 38:31.900] God bless, man, good night
[38:31.900 --> 38:32.900] You too
[38:32.900 --> 38:33.900] Bye-bye
[38:33.900 --> 38:36.900] All right, Angel in Texas
[38:36.900 --> 38:38.900] What can we do for you?
[38:38.900 --> 38:39.900] How you doing, Eddie?
[38:39.900 --> 38:41.900] I'm doing all right, I guess
[38:41.900 --> 38:42.900] Just depends upon who you're asking
[38:42.900 --> 38:44.900] What you see me doing at the time
[38:44.900 --> 38:48.900] Hey, I had an advice
[38:48.900 --> 38:51.900] For that pain on your shoulder though
[38:51.900 --> 38:52.900] Okay
[38:52.900 --> 38:55.900] I remember when I was little
[38:55.900 --> 38:59.900] My aunt used to apply
[38:59.900 --> 39:04.900] Marijuana dissolved in alcohol
[39:04.900 --> 39:08.900] She would let it ferment in there for about two weeks
[39:08.900 --> 39:11.900] And then she would put it on whatever
[39:11.900 --> 39:15.900] I had any pain, especially if it was a joint
[39:15.900 --> 39:17.900] Or a bone pain
[39:17.900 --> 39:19.900] And that would really help
[39:19.900 --> 39:22.900] Yeah, which would be fine
[39:22.900 --> 39:26.900] Except this is not a
[39:26.900 --> 39:28.900] Just a simple pain issue
[39:28.900 --> 39:31.900] There is something physically awry
[39:31.900 --> 39:33.900] I've either got a bone spur
[39:33.900 --> 39:35.900] Or a nerve or something
[39:35.900 --> 39:38.900] That's trapped between something else
[39:38.900 --> 39:42.900] That is actually affecting the muscle tissue
[39:42.900 --> 39:43.900] In that shoulder
[39:43.900 --> 39:44.900] Because it's got a hitch in it
[39:44.900 --> 39:46.900] That does not belong there
[39:46.900 --> 39:47.900] When I rotate it
[39:47.900 --> 39:49.900] And if I try to rotate it beyond a certain point
[39:49.900 --> 39:51.900] You may as well be trying to convince me
[39:51.900 --> 39:52.900] That you're ripping it off
[39:52.900 --> 39:54.900] Because I will believe you
[39:54.900 --> 39:57.900] It hurts that bad
[39:57.900 --> 39:59.900] I don't know why it's there
[39:59.900 --> 40:01.900] It's flared up from time to time
[40:01.900 --> 40:02.900] Over the years
[40:02.900 --> 40:04.900] But never this long or this painful
[40:04.900 --> 40:05.900] I don't know what it is
[40:05.900 --> 40:07.900] But it's steadily gotten worse
[40:07.900 --> 40:09.900] And I need to do something before
[40:09.900 --> 40:11.900] It turns into a case of bursitis
[40:11.900 --> 40:13.900] Or even if I get the original problem fixed
[40:13.900 --> 40:16.900] The pain never goes away
[40:16.900 --> 40:19.900] Have you tried a chiropractor?
[40:19.900 --> 40:21.900] Yeah, my chiropractor
[40:21.900 --> 40:23.900] She agrees there's something there
[40:23.900 --> 40:25.900] But she can't determine what it is
[40:25.900 --> 40:27.900] If it's actually a bone spur
[40:27.900 --> 40:28.900] Cutting into muscle
[40:28.900 --> 40:30.900] Or the cartilage in that socket
[40:30.900 --> 40:32.900] She does not want to aggravate that
[40:32.900 --> 40:33.900] And make it worse
[40:33.900 --> 40:35.900] By attempting to adjust it
[40:35.900 --> 40:37.900] In some way to get it beyond the point
[40:37.900 --> 40:38.900] It doesn't want to go
[40:38.900 --> 40:41.900] Yes, they won't be able to do anything
[40:41.900 --> 40:44.900] I had a friend who had a similar problem
[40:44.900 --> 40:47.900] And he had it taken care of by surgery
[40:47.900 --> 40:49.900] And they only made like
[40:49.900 --> 40:52.900] Two, three little holes around his shoulder
[40:52.900 --> 40:54.900] And it wasn't too bad
[40:54.900 --> 40:57.900] Well, see, surgery is still something completely different
[40:57.900 --> 40:59.900] If I can't afford an MRI to see what's wrong
[40:59.900 --> 41:03.900] I damn sure can't afford a surgery to fix it
[41:03.900 --> 41:06.900] And that's the problem
[41:06.900 --> 41:09.900] So I don't even know what specifically
[41:09.900 --> 41:11.900] Is causing the problem at the moment
[41:11.900 --> 41:12.900] And until I find that out
[41:12.900 --> 41:14.900] It doesn't matter one way or the other
[41:14.900 --> 41:17.900] Because I can't do anything about it
[41:17.900 --> 41:19.900] But I appreciate the call in
[41:19.900 --> 41:21.900] And the attempted advice
[41:21.900 --> 41:22.900] It's just in this particular case
[41:22.900 --> 41:25.900] I don't think it's going to solve my problem
[41:25.900 --> 41:26.900] Got you
[41:26.900 --> 41:28.900] Eddie, I have two questions for you
[41:28.900 --> 41:31.900] Okay
[41:31.900 --> 41:33.900] As you remember
[41:33.900 --> 41:37.900] I beat the petty case of
[41:37.900 --> 41:40.900] Closing against the pedestrian
[41:40.900 --> 41:42.900] Yeah, basically jaywalking, right?
[41:42.900 --> 41:45.900] Yeah, jaywalking in other words
[41:45.900 --> 41:48.900] And as you remember
[41:48.900 --> 41:50.900] As you remember
[41:50.900 --> 41:52.900] The judge didn't take
[41:52.900 --> 41:55.900] Didn't accept my motion to dismissal
[41:55.900 --> 41:59.900] Instead she accepted the prosecutor
[41:59.900 --> 42:01.900] Which that tells me that
[42:01.900 --> 42:05.900] That motion had a lot of power attached to it
[42:05.900 --> 42:08.900] And I would like to continue
[42:08.900 --> 42:14.900] By filing a police complaint
[42:14.900 --> 42:18.900] For incompetence and violation of rights
[42:18.900 --> 42:20.900] Even for
[42:20.900 --> 42:21.900] Well, you want to file a complaint
[42:21.900 --> 42:24.900] Or you want to sue
[42:24.900 --> 42:26.900] I don't know what to do, man
[42:26.900 --> 42:28.900] I'm really asking
[42:28.900 --> 42:30.900] Well, you can do both
[42:30.900 --> 42:32.900] But the question is
[42:32.900 --> 42:35.900] Do you understand the difference in them?
[42:35.900 --> 42:38.900] You can file an internal affairs complaint
[42:38.900 --> 42:41.900] That the officer is acting improperly
[42:41.900 --> 42:43.900] And is not properly trained
[42:43.900 --> 42:45.900] On this particular subject
[42:45.900 --> 42:48.900] You can also sue the officer
[42:48.900 --> 42:50.900] For malicious prosecution
[42:50.900 --> 42:53.900] Because the case was decided in your favor
[42:53.900 --> 42:56.900] Did they dismiss or were you found not guilty?
[42:56.900 --> 42:58.900] Oh, they dismissed it
[42:58.900 --> 42:59.900] Okay
[42:59.900 --> 43:03.900] How close to trial did they dismiss it?
[43:03.900 --> 43:07.900] Oh, it was supposed to be trial study
[43:07.900 --> 43:09.900] To choose the jury
[43:09.900 --> 43:12.900] Okay, so you showed up the day of trial
[43:12.900 --> 43:15.900] And that's when they dismissed it
[43:15.900 --> 43:16.900] Yes
[43:16.900 --> 43:18.900] Okay, then you could make the argument
[43:18.900 --> 43:20.900] That Jeopardy had attached
[43:20.900 --> 43:21.900] Yes, definitely
[43:21.900 --> 43:23.900] That's why I found out that
[43:23.900 --> 43:26.900] Every time prosecution enters a motion
[43:26.900 --> 43:29.900] To dismiss this because Jeopardy is attached
[43:29.900 --> 43:30.900] Right
[43:30.900 --> 43:32.900] Now, well, not every time
[43:32.900 --> 43:35.900] They can do that well before Jeopardy attaches
[43:35.900 --> 43:38.900] But when they do it at the very last minute
[43:38.900 --> 43:41.900] Then the question of whether or not Jeopardy has attached
[43:41.900 --> 43:44.900] To be decided based upon other factors
[43:44.900 --> 43:46.900] And the fact that you were scheduled for trial
[43:46.900 --> 43:49.900] That same day, that's a pretty good argument
[43:49.900 --> 43:51.900] That Jeopardy had attached
[43:51.900 --> 43:53.900] Hang on just a second, Angel, and we'll finish this
[43:53.900 --> 43:55.900] On the other side, okay?
[43:55.900 --> 43:57.900] All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio
[43:57.900 --> 43:59.900] We'll be right back after the break
[44:00.900 --> 44:03.900] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.900 --> 44:05.900] Win your case without an attorney
[44:05.900 --> 44:08.900] With Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand
[44:08.900 --> 44:11.900] Four-CD course that will show you how
[44:11.900 --> 44:14.900] In 24 hours, you step by step
[44:14.900 --> 44:18.900] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[44:18.900 --> 44:22.900] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[44:22.900 --> 44:25.900] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course
[44:25.900 --> 44:27.900] And now you can, too
[44:27.900 --> 44:30.900] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[44:30.900 --> 44:33.900] With 22 years of case-winning experience
[44:33.900 --> 44:35.900] Even if you're not in a lawsuit
[44:35.900 --> 44:38.900] You can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.900 --> 44:40.900] About the principles and practices
[44:40.900 --> 44:42.900] That control our American courts
[44:42.900 --> 44:47.900] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials
[44:47.900 --> 44:51.900] Forms for civil cases, pro-say tactics, and much more
[44:51.900 --> 44:54.900] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[44:54.900 --> 44:56.900] And click on the banner
[44:56.900 --> 45:00.900] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z
[45:00.900 --> 45:04.900] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith
[45:04.900 --> 45:06.900] From naturespureorganics.com
[45:06.900 --> 45:09.900] And I would like to invite you to come by our store
[45:09.900 --> 45:12.900] At 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D, here in Austin, Texas
[45:12.900 --> 45:14.900] To find brave new books and chase things
[45:14.900 --> 45:16.900] To see all our fantastic health and wellness products
[45:16.900 --> 45:18.900] With your very own eyes
[45:18.900 --> 45:20.900] Have a look at our miracle healing clay
[45:20.900 --> 45:22.900] That started our adventure in alternative medicine
[45:22.900 --> 45:24.900] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products
[45:24.900 --> 45:28.900] Including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps
[45:28.900 --> 45:30.900] And colloidal silver and gold
[45:30.900 --> 45:34.900] Call 512-264-4043
[45:34.900 --> 45:37.900] Or find us online at naturespureorganics.com
[45:37.900 --> 45:43.900] That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com
[45:43.900 --> 45:45.900] Don't forget to like us on Facebook
[45:45.900 --> 45:47.900] For information on events and our products
[45:47.900 --> 46:00.900] naturespureorganics.com
[46:17.900 --> 46:22.900] Alright folks, we are back
[46:22.900 --> 46:24.900] This is Rule of Law Radio
[46:24.900 --> 46:29.900] The call-in number is 512-646-1984
[46:29.900 --> 46:32.900] We are still talking with Angel in Texas
[46:32.900 --> 46:36.900] Alright Angel, you were talking about the motion that you filed
[46:36.900 --> 46:38.900] Is this a motion?
[46:38.900 --> 46:40.900] This is the one I helped you write, right?
[46:40.900 --> 46:42.900] Yes, sir
[46:42.900 --> 46:47.900] Yes, I had filed that motion seven days prior
[46:47.900 --> 46:50.900] To the trial setting court
[46:50.900 --> 46:55.900] And on that day of the trial setting
[46:55.900 --> 47:00.900] The prosecution, they just called me to front
[47:00.900 --> 47:03.900] And then she told me, hey, the prosecution entered
[47:03.900 --> 47:06.900] The motion to dismiss the case
[47:06.900 --> 47:09.900] So hereby I'm texting it and blah, blah, blah
[47:09.900 --> 47:14.900] And the reason for the motion to be dismissed
[47:14.900 --> 47:17.900] Was that it was a missing witness
[47:17.900 --> 47:21.900] Right, they didn't want you cross-examining that cop
[47:21.900 --> 47:24.900] That charged you
[47:24.900 --> 47:27.900] So the witness wasn't missing
[47:27.900 --> 47:30.900] The witness was ordered to run away
[47:30.900 --> 47:33.900] Yeah, because I even said
[47:33.900 --> 47:35.900] I didn't run my mouth on court
[47:35.900 --> 47:39.900] But I did say this, oh man, that's a lame excuse
[47:39.900 --> 47:41.900] And that's all I said
[47:41.900 --> 47:44.900] But that's what happened
[47:44.900 --> 47:46.900] And that's what I knew
[47:46.900 --> 47:51.900] So I want to proceed the...
[47:51.900 --> 47:53.900] Continue the action
[47:53.900 --> 47:55.900] But I don't know how to be more effective
[47:55.900 --> 47:56.900] I don't know
[47:56.900 --> 47:59.900] Well, the first thing you can do is file an internal affairs complaint
[47:59.900 --> 48:03.900] Against the officer for not knowing the law
[48:03.900 --> 48:08.900] And allege official misconduct
[48:08.900 --> 48:10.900] Because of his actions toward you
[48:10.900 --> 48:13.900] Based upon his ignorance of the law
[48:13.900 --> 48:16.900] But you can also file a lawsuit against the officer
[48:16.900 --> 48:19.900] For malicious prosecution and false imprisonment
[48:19.900 --> 48:22.900] When the officer detained you without a warrant
[48:22.900 --> 48:25.900] And without proper probable cause
[48:25.900 --> 48:27.900] In order to write you that citation
[48:27.900 --> 48:29.900] And make the charge
[48:29.900 --> 48:32.900] You were not free to leave
[48:32.900 --> 48:34.900] That constitutes false imprisonment
[48:34.900 --> 48:37.900] Because you did not want to be held there
[48:37.900 --> 48:41.900] There was no lawful authority on which to hold you there
[48:41.900 --> 48:43.900] But that's what he was doing
[48:43.900 --> 48:46.900] That's false imprisonment
[48:46.900 --> 48:48.900] Okay, so you have two things
[48:48.900 --> 48:51.900] Two causes of actions you can sue over
[48:51.900 --> 48:54.900] False imprisonment and malicious prosecution
[48:54.900 --> 48:58.900] False imprisonment and malicious prosecution
[48:58.900 --> 49:00.900] Okay
[49:00.900 --> 49:02.900] Now, the one thing I would like to ask you
[49:02.900 --> 49:04.900] Is in keeping with trying to bake
[49:04.900 --> 49:08.900] An accurate running record of how successful we have been
[49:08.900 --> 49:10.900] Like what Rader was talking about
[49:10.900 --> 49:12.900] When he called in a moment ago
[49:12.900 --> 49:16.900] Would you consent to having your case information
[49:16.900 --> 49:19.900] Your original case docket and all that
[49:19.900 --> 49:21.900] And the dismissal order
[49:21.900 --> 49:24.900] With your personal information redacted
[49:24.900 --> 49:28.900] And allow me to post that on my legal blog
[49:28.900 --> 49:31.900] To show that we are being successful
[49:31.900 --> 49:33.900] Sure, man
[49:33.900 --> 49:35.900] I'll be whatever I can do
[49:35.900 --> 49:37.900] Okay, so if at all possible
[49:37.900 --> 49:38.900] At your earliest convenience
[49:38.900 --> 49:42.900] If you would scan in all of the documentation
[49:42.900 --> 49:44.900] That was put together for your case
[49:44.900 --> 49:47.900] Whether you filed it or whether they put it in there
[49:47.900 --> 49:49.900] Everything you've got
[49:49.900 --> 49:51.900] If you will scan it in front and back
[49:51.900 --> 49:52.900] If there is a back
[49:52.900 --> 49:54.900] And send that to me
[49:54.900 --> 49:58.900] I will post it up on my legal blog to show
[49:58.900 --> 49:59.900] How we can be successful
[49:59.900 --> 50:02.900] And that we are being successful
[50:02.900 --> 50:04.900] Yes, yes, yes
[50:04.900 --> 50:05.900] I'm also doing my part
[50:05.900 --> 50:08.900] I'm telling friends and acquaintances
[50:08.900 --> 50:10.900] And, you know, I'm informing people
[50:10.900 --> 50:11.900] Not telling them
[50:11.900 --> 50:15.900] I'm informing them that they need to get informed
[50:15.900 --> 50:17.900] You see, that
[50:17.900 --> 50:20.900] We can win, you know, in numbers
[50:20.900 --> 50:21.900] But yes, man
[50:21.900 --> 50:23.900] I can help you with that
[50:23.900 --> 50:25.900] As soon as I hang up with you
[50:25.900 --> 50:27.900] I'll start doing the scanning
[50:27.900 --> 50:30.900] And put it in file
[50:30.900 --> 50:33.900] And I can send it to your email
[50:33.900 --> 50:36.900] Is there any particular heading name
[50:36.900 --> 50:38.900] That you want me to put on the email?
[50:38.900 --> 50:40.900] No, just put case win
[50:40.900 --> 50:41.900] Or court win
[50:41.900 --> 50:42.900] Or whatever you want to
[50:42.900 --> 50:44.900] Just so I know what I'm looking for
[50:44.900 --> 50:45.900] Sure
[50:45.900 --> 50:46.900] Okay
[50:46.900 --> 50:48.900] Okay, and yes
[50:48.900 --> 50:53.900] So where do I find the procedures
[50:53.900 --> 50:57.900] To start this internal affairs complaint
[50:57.900 --> 50:59.900] In this lawsuit?
[50:59.900 --> 51:02.900] All you have to do for the internal affairs complaint
[51:02.900 --> 51:03.900] Is go down to the police department
[51:03.900 --> 51:05.900] And ask to speak with someone in internal affairs
[51:05.900 --> 51:07.900] You want to file a complaint
[51:07.900 --> 51:08.900] Now, be aware
[51:08.900 --> 51:11.900] Depending upon what police station you go into
[51:11.900 --> 51:14.900] You could get seriously harassed
[51:14.900 --> 51:16.900] For trying to file a complaint
[51:16.900 --> 51:17.900] So do yourself a favor
[51:17.900 --> 51:20.900] One, take another person with you
[51:20.900 --> 51:23.900] Of competent and reliable character
[51:23.900 --> 51:24.900] Good character
[51:24.900 --> 51:26.900] Not a convicted felon at all, okay
[51:26.900 --> 51:29.900] Someone that they can't hold anything over
[51:29.900 --> 51:32.900] That is a reliable witness in a courtroom
[51:32.900 --> 51:35.900] To witness everything that goes on while you're there
[51:35.900 --> 51:36.900] Number two
[51:36.900 --> 51:41.900] Both of you carry something that audio and video records
[51:41.900 --> 51:44.900] And do not allow yourselves to be separated
[51:44.900 --> 51:46.900] If you go in to make the complaint
[51:46.900 --> 51:49.900] Tell them you want this person to go also
[51:49.900 --> 51:51.900] And record while we're talking
[51:51.900 --> 51:52.900] Exactly
[51:52.900 --> 51:55.900] And you do not have to inform this is Texas
[51:55.900 --> 51:56.900] It's a one-party state
[51:56.900 --> 52:02.900] Neither of you have to inform anyone that you're recording
[52:02.900 --> 52:04.900] So don't
[52:04.900 --> 52:08.900] Because they will try to tell you to stop
[52:08.900 --> 52:10.900] And you don't want that
[52:10.900 --> 52:13.900] Believe me, you don't want that
[52:13.900 --> 52:16.900] I've been following your advice
[52:16.900 --> 52:18.900] When I went to court
[52:18.900 --> 52:21.900] I actually had a small recorder
[52:21.900 --> 52:24.900] Because the policeman, how do you call it?
[52:24.900 --> 52:25.900] The jailer, whatever
[52:25.900 --> 52:27.900] That dude with the uniform in court
[52:27.900 --> 52:28.900] The bailer
[52:28.900 --> 52:30.900] That everybody thinks of
[52:30.900 --> 52:31.900] The bailer, there you go
[52:31.900 --> 52:34.900] He makes sure that everyone turns off their cell phones
[52:34.900 --> 52:36.900] So I just complied
[52:36.900 --> 52:40.900] But I didn't let them know that I had my own recorder on
[52:40.900 --> 52:42.900] I was recording everything
[52:42.900 --> 52:47.900] Nothing came out because they dismissed the case
[52:47.900 --> 52:51.900] But I was wanting to record that
[52:51.900 --> 52:53.900] So I'll follow that
[52:53.900 --> 52:56.900] As far as the lawsuit
[52:56.900 --> 52:59.900] You're just going to have to look up previously filed lawsuits
[52:59.900 --> 53:00.900] On those subjects
[53:00.900 --> 53:04.900] And copy what you see there from ones that were settled or won
[53:04.900 --> 53:10.900] Any particular website or anything?
[53:10.900 --> 53:12.900] No, there's no way I can answer that
[53:12.900 --> 53:14.900] You just have to do a search on
[53:14.900 --> 53:17.900] Either Google Scholar or Pacer
[53:17.900 --> 53:20.900] And see if there were state or federal lawsuits
[53:20.900 --> 53:23.900] Filed under those causes of action
[53:23.900 --> 53:24.900] Okay
[53:24.900 --> 53:27.900] And see what you can pull up
[53:27.900 --> 53:28.900] All right, man
[53:28.900 --> 53:29.900] Okay
[53:29.900 --> 53:30.900] I really appreciate that
[53:30.900 --> 53:33.900] And I really appreciate you helping
[53:33.900 --> 53:34.900] Thank you very much
[53:34.900 --> 53:37.900] And hopefully you get better from that shoulder
[53:37.900 --> 53:39.900] Yeah, I hope so too
[53:39.900 --> 53:41.900] Because when I start building this Aquaponics Greenhouse
[53:41.900 --> 53:42.900] And everything
[53:42.900 --> 53:44.900] That's going to become a serious issue
[53:44.900 --> 53:47.900] If I can't lift those 4x4s and 4x6s
[53:47.900 --> 53:48.900] Up to where I need them
[53:48.900 --> 53:49.900] Do you need any help?
[53:49.900 --> 53:50.900] Let me know, dude
[53:50.900 --> 53:51.900] No charge
[53:51.900 --> 53:53.900] I appreciate that
[53:53.900 --> 53:55.900] I can help you
[53:55.900 --> 53:56.900] All right, I appreciate that, Angel
[53:56.900 --> 53:58.900] Thank you
[53:58.900 --> 53:59.900] All right, man
[53:59.900 --> 54:00.900] All right, you have a good night
[54:00.900 --> 54:01.900] Thanks for calling
[54:01.900 --> 54:02.900] You too
[54:03.900 --> 54:04.900] All right
[54:04.900 --> 54:06.900] Now we have a first time caller
[54:06.900 --> 54:07.900] James in Texas
[54:07.900 --> 54:09.900] James, what can we do for you?
[54:10.900 --> 54:14.900] Well, I'm from your neck of the woods
[54:14.900 --> 54:17.900] Yeah, I can tell that by the area code
[54:17.900 --> 54:19.900] Yeah, I live in Lufkin
[54:19.900 --> 54:22.900] But I work at 4,500 North Street, Macadochew
[54:22.900 --> 54:25.900] Hey, I know where that is
[54:25.900 --> 54:28.900] Yeah, talking to the landlord
[54:28.900 --> 54:31.900] He let me know that's where I've been listening to you
[54:31.900 --> 54:33.900] For about a year
[54:33.900 --> 54:36.900] On the radio before I found that out
[54:36.900 --> 54:38.900] But he sure hated to lose you
[54:38.900 --> 54:39.900] I'll tell you that
[54:39.900 --> 54:40.900] Well, I hated to go
[54:40.900 --> 54:42.900] But the state was giving him as many problems
[54:42.900 --> 54:44.900] As they were trying to give me
[54:44.900 --> 54:46.900] And I was better suited to take it than he was
[54:46.900 --> 54:48.900] So...
[54:48.900 --> 54:51.900] But no, I was...
[54:51.900 --> 54:52.900] Just wanted to call in
[54:52.900 --> 54:56.900] I was actually listening to some archives today
[54:56.900 --> 55:00.900] From 2014, in April, I think
[55:00.900 --> 55:05.900] And you kind of got on a little rant about
[55:05.900 --> 55:09.900] People needing to do stuff on their own
[55:09.900 --> 55:11.900] Instead of coming to you for everything
[55:11.900 --> 55:12.900] And it reminded me
[55:12.900 --> 55:15.900] I sent you an email, I don't know, six months ago or so
[55:15.900 --> 55:17.900] No, yes
[55:17.900 --> 55:19.900] Sometime before the first year
[55:19.900 --> 55:21.900] About the...
[55:21.900 --> 55:23.900] Whatever form that you fill in
[55:23.900 --> 55:25.900] To send to the state controller
[55:25.900 --> 55:28.900] To get the fuel tax return back to you
[55:28.900 --> 55:29.900] And I pulled the form up
[55:29.900 --> 55:31.900] And I sent you...
[55:31.900 --> 55:33.900] I kind of looked over it a little bit
[55:33.900 --> 55:36.900] Sent you an email and was asking
[55:36.900 --> 55:38.900] You know, how in the heck do you fill this thing out?
[55:38.900 --> 55:40.900] And you kind of said
[55:40.900 --> 55:42.900] And your blunt was
[55:42.900 --> 55:46.900] Kind of slapped my hand with a rudder and said
[55:46.900 --> 55:49.900] Contact the state controller
[55:49.900 --> 55:52.900] Yeah, because they could actually tell you far better than I could
[55:52.900 --> 55:55.900] Because I've never actually filled one of those forms out myself
[55:55.900 --> 55:59.900] But my point was
[55:59.900 --> 56:01.900] You did it in a way that
[56:01.900 --> 56:05.900] A lot of people would take offense
[56:05.900 --> 56:07.900] At somebody telling them
[56:07.900 --> 56:09.900] Well, figure this out on your own, dummy
[56:09.900 --> 56:11.900] But I don't
[56:11.900 --> 56:12.900] I take...
[56:12.900 --> 56:14.900] And you didn't say it that way
[56:14.900 --> 56:16.900] But the basic just was
[56:16.900 --> 56:17.900] You know what?
[56:17.900 --> 56:19.900] You can figure this out on your own
[56:19.900 --> 56:22.900] And I thought today
[56:22.900 --> 56:23.900] When I was listening to that archive
[56:23.900 --> 56:26.900] You know, that's exactly what he did to me there
[56:26.900 --> 56:28.900] And he was right to do it
[56:28.900 --> 56:29.900] I can read
[56:29.900 --> 56:31.900] I can understand what I read
[56:31.900 --> 56:33.900] Yeah, and the reason that I...
[56:33.900 --> 56:35.900] The reason I said that originally
[56:35.900 --> 56:37.900] And the reason I do it that way
[56:37.900 --> 56:39.900] Is one, my time is
[56:39.900 --> 56:40.900] My time is eat up
[56:40.900 --> 56:42.900] Constantly having to reply to stuff like this
[56:42.900 --> 56:44.900] But the thing about it is
[56:44.900 --> 56:47.900] Is common sense would tell most people
[56:47.900 --> 56:51.900] That when you get a form from a particular state agency
[56:51.900 --> 56:54.900] That agency is in a much better position
[56:54.900 --> 56:58.900] To give you reliable information about that form
[56:58.900 --> 57:00.900] Than someone like me
[57:00.900 --> 57:02.900] That should be an absolute
[57:02.900 --> 57:04.900] No brainer to anyone
[57:04.900 --> 57:06.900] And then it relates to everything
[57:06.900 --> 57:10.900] Not just forms, but to other things
[57:10.900 --> 57:12.900] But I was, you know
[57:12.900 --> 57:15.900] My point is, I was taking the eat way out
[57:15.900 --> 57:17.900] Here I'm thinking, you've already done this
[57:17.900 --> 57:19.900] So you know the answer
[57:19.900 --> 57:20.900] Let me just ask you
[57:20.900 --> 57:21.900] Right
[57:21.900 --> 57:23.900] And everybody does that
[57:23.900 --> 57:25.900] And the thing is is
[57:25.900 --> 57:27.900] It may be easier for you guys
[57:27.900 --> 57:30.900] But it sure is not easier on me
[57:30.900 --> 57:33.900] But you know, and there's been a lot of times
[57:33.900 --> 57:36.900] I've wanted to either send you an email
[57:36.900 --> 57:39.900] Or something and I stopped myself
[57:39.900 --> 57:42.900] I started two years ago
[57:42.900 --> 57:43.900] Memorial Day weekend
[57:43.900 --> 57:45.900] So almost exactly two years ago
[57:45.900 --> 57:47.900] I had my first bad run in with a cop
[57:47.900 --> 57:48.900] And I sent you
[57:48.900 --> 57:49.900] And when I finally found you
[57:49.900 --> 57:52.900] About a week and a half to read later
[57:52.900 --> 57:53.900] And I'm listening to you
[57:53.900 --> 57:56.900] Of course I'm listening to a bunch of other junk
[57:56.900 --> 57:58.900] That didn't make a lot of sense
[57:58.900 --> 58:02.900] But whatever show I listened to first
[58:02.900 --> 58:04.900] Something that stuck with me
[58:04.900 --> 58:06.900] Don't believe what I'm telling you
[58:06.900 --> 58:08.900] Read it for yourself
[58:08.900 --> 58:10.900] And I started reading all this
[58:10.900 --> 58:15.900] And I'm going, I mean I was stunned
[58:15.900 --> 58:17.900] And shocked at first
[58:17.900 --> 58:19.900] Well then you took it more mildly than I did
[58:19.900 --> 58:22.900] Because I was utterly pissed off when I read it
[58:22.900 --> 58:25.900] Well now I am full blow pissed off
[58:25.900 --> 58:27.900] All right Jayz, well hang on
[58:27.900 --> 58:28.900] I don't mean to interrupt you
[58:28.900 --> 58:30.900] But I got a top of the hour break here
[58:30.900 --> 58:31.900] Let me get that out of the way
[58:31.900 --> 58:32.900] And I'll come right back
[58:32.900 --> 58:35.900] And we can wrap this up with you, okay?
[58:35.900 --> 58:36.900] All righty
[58:36.900 --> 58:37.900] All right, okay folks
[58:37.900 --> 58:39.900] This is the Monday night rule of law radio show
[58:39.900 --> 58:40.900] With your host Eddie Craig
[58:40.900 --> 58:41.900] We are at the top of the hour
[58:41.900 --> 58:42.900] So y'all hang in there
[58:42.900 --> 58:45.900] And we will be right back after this break
[58:49.900 --> 58:53.900] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world
[58:53.900 --> 58:55.900] Yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.900 --> 58:57.900] Because they struggle to understand it
[58:57.900 --> 58:59.900] Some new translations try to help
[58:59.900 --> 59:01.900] By simplifying the text
[59:01.900 --> 59:03.900] But in the process can compromise
[59:03.900 --> 59:06.900] The profound meaning of the Scripture
[59:06.900 --> 59:08.900] Enter the recovery version
[59:08.900 --> 59:10.900] First this new translation
[59:10.900 --> 59:12.900] Is extremely faithful and accurate
[59:12.900 --> 59:14.900] But the real story is the more than
[59:14.900 --> 59:17.900] 9000 explanatory footnotes
[59:17.900 --> 59:19.900] Difficult and profound passages
[59:19.900 --> 59:21.900] Are opened up in a marvelous way
[59:21.900 --> 59:24.900] Providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[59:24.900 --> 59:27.900] Beyond which you've ever experienced before
[59:27.900 --> 59:29.900] Bibles for America would like to give you
[59:29.900 --> 59:32.900] A free recovery version simply for the asking
[59:32.900 --> 59:35.900] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible
[59:35.900 --> 59:38.900] Is yours just by calling us toll free
[59:38.900 --> 59:43.900] At 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.900 --> 59:47.900] Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[59:47.900 --> 59:50.900] That's freestudybible.com
[59:50.900 --> 59:53.900] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[59:53.900 --> 01:00:22.900] LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:00:22.900 --> 01:00:25.900] Markets for the 11th of April, 2018
[01:00:25.900 --> 01:00:28.900] Closed with gold at $1,353.22 an ounce
[01:00:28.900 --> 01:00:31.900] Silver, $16.68 an ounce
[01:00:31.900 --> 01:00:34.900] Texas Crude, $65.51 a barrel
[01:00:34.900 --> 01:00:37.900] Bitcoins at $6,902.19
[01:00:37.900 --> 01:00:40.900] Ethereum's at $420.80
[01:00:40.900 --> 01:00:43.900] Bitcoin Cash is at $652.90
[01:00:43.900 --> 01:00:46.900] And finally Litecoin's at $114.34
[01:00:46.900 --> 01:00:54.900] A CryptoCoin
[01:00:54.900 --> 01:00:57.900] Today in history, the year 1968
[01:00:57.900 --> 01:01:00.900] President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01:00.900 --> 01:01:03.900] of 1968 which prohibited private businesses
[01:01:03.900 --> 01:01:06.900] from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex
[01:01:06.900 --> 01:01:09.900] or national origin. It also prohibited unequal application
[01:01:09.900 --> 01:01:12.900] of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:01:12.900 --> 01:01:14.900] in public schools, in employment
[01:01:14.900 --> 01:01:17.900] and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:01:17.900 --> 01:01:20.900] Today in history.
[01:01:23.900 --> 01:01:26.900] In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels
[01:01:26.900 --> 01:01:29.900] after a chemical attack on civilians in the city of Douma
[01:01:29.900 --> 01:01:32.900] which left 40 dead and many injured. An attack which is being
[01:01:32.900 --> 01:01:35.900] blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad
[01:01:35.900 --> 01:01:38.900] by the United States and on Israel by Russia
[01:01:38.900 --> 01:01:41.900] either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence
[01:01:41.900 --> 01:01:44.900] as of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday
[01:01:44.900 --> 01:01:47.900] that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles
[01:01:47.900 --> 01:01:50.900] fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming
[01:01:50.900 --> 01:01:53.900] in nice and new and smart. Going on to warn Russia
[01:01:53.900 --> 01:01:56.900] that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal
[01:01:56.900 --> 01:01:59.900] who kills his people and enjoys it. Many in the West including
[01:01:59.900 --> 01:02:02.900] President Trump have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[01:02:02.900 --> 01:02:05.900] attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[01:02:05.900 --> 01:02:08.900] Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given
[01:02:08.900 --> 01:02:11.900] approval since yesterday for the organization for the prohibition
[01:02:11.900 --> 01:02:14.900] of chemical weapons to investigate the sign of the chemical
[01:02:14.900 --> 01:02:17.900] slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining
[01:02:17.900 --> 01:02:20.900] rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil war,
[01:02:20.900 --> 01:02:23.900] a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria
[01:02:23.900 --> 01:02:26.900] and anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded
[01:02:26.900 --> 01:02:29.900] by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[01:02:29.900 --> 01:02:32.900] notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:32.900 --> 01:02:35.900] No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman
[01:02:35.900 --> 01:02:38.900] Maria Zakhova posted on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired
[01:02:38.900 --> 01:02:41.900] at terrorists and not at a legitimate government,
[01:02:41.900 --> 01:02:44.900] which has been fighting terrorists. Or is this a trick
[01:02:44.900 --> 01:02:47.900] to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike?
[01:02:47.900 --> 01:02:50.900] And then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at.
[01:02:50.900 --> 01:03:06.900] This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:20.900 --> 01:03:45.900] This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:45.900 --> 01:03:55.900] This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:55.900 --> 01:03:59.900] All right folks, we are back. This is Monday Night
[01:03:59.900 --> 01:04:02.900] Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig.
[01:04:02.900 --> 01:04:06.900] Calling number is 512-646-1984. We got one hour left in the show
[01:04:06.900 --> 01:04:10.900] and we are currently talking to James in Texas, a first-time caller.
[01:04:10.900 --> 01:04:15.900] Please continue. All right. I've got two other quick things
[01:04:15.900 --> 01:04:19.900] and I'll let you get somebody else. I ordered the constitutional
[01:04:19.900 --> 01:04:25.900] challenge motion March 29th, I think, and I sent you an email
[01:04:25.900 --> 01:04:28.900] about mid-April. I hadn't received it yet and you said
[01:04:28.900 --> 01:04:32.900] there may not have sent it to you. I still hadn't got it.
[01:04:32.900 --> 01:04:36.900] Okay. I've just been wanting to. I don't have any issues right now,
[01:04:36.900 --> 01:04:41.900] so I want to just start reading it. Sure. Let's see.
[01:04:41.900 --> 01:04:44.900] Can you at least give me the first part of the email address?
[01:04:44.900 --> 01:04:46.900] You don't have to give me the whole thing. Just give me the first part
[01:04:46.900 --> 01:04:55.900] of it so I can look it up. Swift cash. Okay.
[01:04:55.900 --> 01:04:58.900] And this goes along with the lines of not wanting to bother you
[01:04:58.900 --> 01:05:03.900] all the time and why haven't you sent another one or I don't want
[01:05:03.900 --> 01:05:08.900] to be a bitch? Well, I hate to be the one to break it to you,
[01:05:08.900 --> 01:05:12.900] but I don't show a single thing in my email that starts with that
[01:05:12.900 --> 01:05:17.900] as an address. Well, I can send you another one here in a couple
[01:05:17.900 --> 01:05:22.900] of days. You answered me back on it, but that's, like I said,
[01:05:22.900 --> 01:05:26.900] that takes weeks. On that particular email address?
[01:05:26.900 --> 01:05:33.900] Yeah, that's the only one I use. Okay. I'll continue another one.
[01:05:33.900 --> 01:05:36.900] Okay. Please do and I'll be on the lookout for it now that I know
[01:05:36.900 --> 01:05:41.900] to expect it. But the other thing is I have one daughter that
[01:05:41.900 --> 01:05:46.900] just recently graduated from A&M and moved to Austin a couple
[01:05:46.900 --> 01:05:50.900] of weeks ago and my youngest daughter graduated from high school
[01:05:50.900 --> 01:05:54.900] and she's moving down there with her sister in a couple of weeks.
[01:05:54.900 --> 01:05:59.900] So along the lines with Angel, I'll be more than happy to come help
[01:05:59.900 --> 01:06:05.900] you out with your aquaponics farm. I was a saw filer for 16 years.
[01:06:05.900 --> 01:06:08.900] I can swing a hammer like nobody's business and done a lot of
[01:06:08.900 --> 01:06:12.900] remodeling and stuff. Yeah, I actually did construction back
[01:06:12.900 --> 01:06:16.900] before I went in the Air Force. I helped build a Laquita Inn
[01:06:16.900 --> 01:06:20.900] that's down there in Nacogdoches right down there on South Street
[01:06:20.900 --> 01:06:24.900] past the bridge. Yeah. I built that place.
[01:06:24.900 --> 01:06:30.900] But I've got every Sunday off and I can each day have two other
[01:06:30.900 --> 01:06:34.900] days off during the week. I can come down and help you on Sunday,
[01:06:34.900 --> 01:06:39.900] Monday, Tuesday to help you during the day and visit my girls at night.
[01:06:39.900 --> 01:06:42.900] All right. Well, I appreciate the offer. I'll most certainly
[01:06:42.900 --> 01:06:45.900] let you know if it comes to that. And if you're ever up here
[01:06:45.900 --> 01:06:49.900] in Austin, then just shoot me an email and let me know.
[01:06:49.900 --> 01:06:51.900] And if you want to hook up and have a coffee or something,
[01:06:51.900 --> 01:06:55.900] then we can work on doing that too. I always like to meet people
[01:06:55.900 --> 01:06:59.900] that listen to the show. I just need a heads up on time
[01:06:59.900 --> 01:07:04.900] as to when to do it. Yeah. And when I head down that way,
[01:07:04.900 --> 01:07:08.900] I'll bring you some of the best Boudin you ever ate in your life.
[01:07:08.900 --> 01:07:13.900] All right. Well, I like good Boudin, so you won't see me complaining.
[01:07:13.900 --> 01:07:16.900] All righty, Will. I appreciate talking to you.
[01:07:16.900 --> 01:07:20.900] There. Thanks for calling. All right, folks.
[01:07:20.900 --> 01:07:23.900] That was James in Texas. It sounded like a good conversation
[01:07:23.900 --> 01:07:26.900] from my side of things, so I appreciate him greatly.
[01:07:26.900 --> 01:07:29.900] All right. That being said, let's get to Ralph in Texas.
[01:07:29.900 --> 01:07:33.900] Ralph, what you got? Hello, Eddie. Hello.
[01:07:33.900 --> 01:07:37.900] I was talking to talk to you about your opener with complaints on judges.
[01:07:37.900 --> 01:07:43.900] Uh-huh. And Truth Raider called in and I think I remember them saying
[01:07:43.900 --> 01:07:46.900] something a while back I'd like to address, okay? Okay.
[01:07:46.900 --> 01:07:51.900] It seems like he said something about governments ordained by God
[01:07:51.900 --> 01:07:55.900] and how does that square with going after the government?
[01:07:55.900 --> 01:07:58.900] And I was, I've been playing with that.
[01:07:58.900 --> 01:08:03.900] Well, he's thinking of Romans 13, but still, or is it 313?
[01:08:03.900 --> 01:08:07.900] What he's talking about is a verse in Romans.
[01:08:07.900 --> 01:08:12.900] Yes. Yes. Well, what I was thinking was, yeah, okay,
[01:08:12.900 --> 01:08:15.900] I don't know if that's true or not. It sounds okay, I guess.
[01:08:15.900 --> 01:08:19.900] I'm not going to judge it, but I am going to say that that passage
[01:08:19.900 --> 01:08:24.900] does not mean that every government employee is ordained by God.
[01:08:24.900 --> 01:08:30.900] No. And besides, what it says is all lawful governments, okay?
[01:08:30.900 --> 01:08:35.900] When the government is not functioning in accordance with law,
[01:08:35.900 --> 01:08:41.900] and in this particular case, he's right, and that law is multifaceted,
[01:08:41.900 --> 01:08:46.900] God's law versus the written law, as man put it down on paper,
[01:08:46.900 --> 01:08:51.900] when it's not functioning consistently with those priorities,
[01:08:51.900 --> 01:08:56.900] then it's not a lawful government.
[01:08:56.900 --> 01:09:01.900] Okay. So I don't know how deep we want to get into this,
[01:09:01.900 --> 01:09:03.900] but I was just kind of thinking because of that,
[01:09:03.900 --> 01:09:08.900] because what you just said now, let's say that the Constitution
[01:09:08.900 --> 01:09:11.900] and statute law, which I don't believe is,
[01:09:11.900 --> 01:09:14.900] but let's just say for argument that they're both within God's law,
[01:09:14.900 --> 01:09:18.900] but yet case law is not within God's law.
[01:09:18.900 --> 01:09:21.900] So that makes it much more dynamic.
[01:09:21.900 --> 01:09:28.900] Well, it depends upon how you view what case law is actually allowed to do
[01:09:28.900 --> 01:09:33.900] in that context. What they're doing with it most absolutely is not lawful,
[01:09:33.900 --> 01:09:38.900] okay, because they're using it to rewrite the law to suit the outcomes they want
[01:09:38.900 --> 01:09:42.900] more often than not, which they're not allowed to do.
[01:09:42.900 --> 01:09:45.900] That's not a lawful capacity of the court.
[01:09:45.900 --> 01:09:50.900] Furthermore, the court is attempting to interpret law where interpretation
[01:09:50.900 --> 01:09:54.900] is not required because the language is clear.
[01:09:54.900 --> 01:10:01.900] It just isn't the way they want it to work out when you read the language.
[01:10:01.900 --> 01:10:05.900] It's not going to facilitate the outcome they want,
[01:10:05.900 --> 01:10:09.900] so they have to fudge it just a bit by changing what terms mean
[01:10:09.900 --> 01:10:12.900] so they can do it and make it look legitimate.
[01:10:12.900 --> 01:10:14.900] Nostalgia didn't do what they wanted.
[01:10:14.900 --> 01:10:19.900] Exactly. And the other thing is is when they're writing opinions
[01:10:19.900 --> 01:10:26.900] that create something that exists other than what is the law encompasses.
[01:10:26.900 --> 01:10:29.900] All those things are unlawful.
[01:10:29.900 --> 01:10:35.900] Now, my take on interpretation of statute by the courts is very straightforward
[01:10:35.900 --> 01:10:37.900] and very, very simple.
[01:10:37.900 --> 01:10:44.900] If the statute requires interpretation by some higher power before it can be
[01:10:44.900 --> 01:10:50.900] understood by the majority, then on its face the statute is vague, ambiguous,
[01:10:50.900 --> 01:10:57.900] and overbroad because it is incomprehensible to those it pretends to govern.
[01:10:57.900 --> 01:11:03.900] Thus the statute on its face is unconstitutional.
[01:11:03.900 --> 01:11:10.900] That should be the limit of statutory interpretation when it comes to the law.
[01:11:10.900 --> 01:11:13.900] The court can decide three things.
[01:11:13.900 --> 01:11:18.900] Is the statute constitutionally compliant the way it is written
[01:11:18.900 --> 01:11:22.900] and is the way it's written comprehensible by the common man
[01:11:22.900 --> 01:11:26.900] using everyday language and the law itself?
[01:11:26.900 --> 01:11:33.900] If not, the law is unconstitutional and must be struck down.
[01:11:33.900 --> 01:11:35.900] End of discussion.
[01:11:35.900 --> 01:11:42.900] No need to interpret specific terms in the law that require that interpretation
[01:11:42.900 --> 01:11:49.900] for the law to be understood because that opens the door for the courts
[01:11:49.900 --> 01:11:52.900] to create a definition for how they want it to work
[01:11:52.900 --> 01:11:58.900] instead of how it was meant to work and how it may constitutionally work.
[01:11:58.900 --> 01:12:07.900] Your recent argument with the attorney on the transportation code
[01:12:07.900 --> 01:12:14.900] and your part about the origin phrases, the origins, and definitions
[01:12:14.900 --> 01:12:19.900] that pretty much backs up what you're saying right now.
[01:12:19.900 --> 01:12:20.900] Exactly.
[01:12:20.900 --> 01:12:25.900] The law itself says that's how it's got to be done and they're not doing it.
[01:12:25.900 --> 01:12:26.900] Right.
[01:12:26.900 --> 01:12:28.900] You have to do it this way.
[01:12:28.900 --> 01:12:32.900] If you go in and you can't read it, they're telling you how you have to read it.
[01:12:32.900 --> 01:12:35.900] You're telling you to use the words and definitions this way.
[01:12:35.900 --> 01:12:38.900] You do that and then it still doesn't work.
[01:12:38.900 --> 01:12:40.900] That's obviously vague and ambiguous.
[01:12:40.900 --> 01:12:47.900] Are there circumstances that will be changing the statute law with case law?
[01:12:47.900 --> 01:12:51.900] Yeah. I used some of your material recently.
[01:12:51.900 --> 01:12:54.900] I feel like I owed you something for it.
[01:12:54.900 --> 01:12:59.900] I chopped it up and had a lot of fun with it and I thought it was really dynamite.
[01:12:59.900 --> 01:13:02.900] Of course, I'm not doing any good, but I think I know why
[01:13:02.900 --> 01:13:06.900] because I'm just going to have to go higher up with it.
[01:13:06.900 --> 01:13:10.900] Maybe I can send you something to help you with that shoulder.
[01:13:10.900 --> 01:13:11.900] I appreciate you.
[01:13:11.900 --> 01:13:16.900] If you've got a spare MRI machine laying around, I'll be more than happy to put it to use.
[01:13:16.900 --> 01:13:20.900] I'll tell you what, I'll go on the Internet and see if I can find you a picture of one.
[01:13:20.900 --> 01:13:25.900] Well good, because all that's going to do is take a picture of my shoulder, right?
[01:13:25.900 --> 01:13:28.900] Yeah, exactly. Send you a camera.
[01:13:28.900 --> 01:13:34.900] You mentioned something about criminal complaints on judges, openers, right?
[01:13:34.900 --> 01:13:35.900] Right.
[01:13:35.900 --> 01:13:40.900] Randy actually mentioned this recently as well.
[01:13:40.900 --> 01:13:48.900] What he was saying was, let's say, let me think on the case, due process,
[01:13:48.900 --> 01:13:53.900] like if a magistrate issues a warrant for arrest without probable cause,
[01:13:53.900 --> 01:13:56.900] that is a due process violation.
[01:13:56.900 --> 01:13:57.900] Yes.
[01:13:57.900 --> 01:13:58.900] A due process amendment.
[01:13:58.900 --> 01:14:03.900] But you're going at it a little bit differently with a criminal complaint.
[01:14:03.900 --> 01:14:05.900] Well, yes and no.
[01:14:05.900 --> 01:14:11.900] The fact is, is not only is the judge, in this particular instance, in the way they handle these cases,
[01:14:11.900 --> 01:14:15.900] not only are these judges guilty of committing crimes,
[01:14:15.900 --> 01:14:21.900] but the way they're going about it actually violates due process.
[01:14:21.900 --> 01:14:23.900] So it's a two-fold issue.
[01:14:23.900 --> 01:14:30.900] It's a violation not only of state law, but of federally protected rights at the same time.
[01:14:30.900 --> 01:14:36.900] So this gives you two big hammers to start beating them with.
[01:14:36.900 --> 01:14:42.900] They're just too stupid to realize it until they're caught up in it.
[01:14:42.900 --> 01:14:52.900] Well, now, let's say that Randy was suggesting to make a criminal complaint with the FBI.
[01:14:52.900 --> 01:15:00.900] Could you also make a 14th Amendment due process criminal complaint on a magistrate judge?
[01:15:00.900 --> 01:15:05.900] Well, the 14th Amendment complaint is not a criminal complaint.
[01:15:05.900 --> 01:15:09.900] It's a civil rights complaint.
[01:15:09.900 --> 01:15:12.900] That requires a lawsuit.
[01:15:12.900 --> 01:15:23.900] A Title 18 criminal complaint is what you have to do in relation to a violation of rights under color of law.
[01:15:23.900 --> 01:15:25.900] Okay, I do remember hearing about that.
[01:15:25.900 --> 01:15:28.900] I don't know if I missed that whenever Randy was talking.
[01:15:28.900 --> 01:15:29.900] It's quite possible.
[01:15:29.900 --> 01:15:38.900] You guys have a lot on your programs and you really need to go back and listen to them to get the full meeting of everything sometimes.
[01:15:38.900 --> 01:15:43.900] Okay, so let me think.
[01:15:43.900 --> 01:15:45.900] Title 18, okay.
[01:15:45.900 --> 01:15:47.900] So what did you think?
[01:15:47.900 --> 01:15:53.900] Can you kind of give me an analysis, say a magistrate issues a warrant that lacks probable cause?
[01:15:53.900 --> 01:15:57.900] Go with a Title 18 criminal complaint?
[01:15:57.900 --> 01:16:01.900] Once you get arrested on that warrant, you've suffered a harm.
[01:16:01.900 --> 01:16:14.900] Now you have a title, you have a criminal complaint against them with the United States Attorney's Office and the FBI and any other DOJ agency that takes those types of complaints.
[01:16:14.900 --> 01:16:19.900] But you also have a civil lawsuit under Title 42.
[01:16:19.900 --> 01:16:26.900] You can't get money from a criminal complaint, okay?
[01:16:26.900 --> 01:16:38.900] You can get money from a rights violation that's related to the consequences of their criminal act, which is the harm it caused you.
[01:16:38.900 --> 01:16:42.900] Provided there is a cause of action relative to that criminal act.
[01:16:42.900 --> 01:16:48.900] Not all criminal acts have a cause of action that allow you to sue for them.
[01:16:48.900 --> 01:16:49.900] Okay.
[01:16:49.900 --> 01:16:50.900] Okay, hang on just a minute.
[01:16:50.900 --> 01:16:53.900] I got another break here and then we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:53.900 --> 01:16:57.900] Alright folks, y'all hang in there. We will be right back after this break.
[01:17:24.900 --> 01:17:27.900] More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:27.900 --> 01:17:33.900] When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:33.900 --> 01:17:37.900] Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:37.900 --> 01:17:42.900] And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:42.900 --> 01:17:51.900] If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[01:17:51.900 --> 01:17:54.900] We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:54.900 --> 01:17:59.900] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:17:59.900 --> 01:18:01.900] I love Logos.
[01:18:01.900 --> 01:18:04.900] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.900 --> 01:18:07.900] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.900 --> 01:18:08.900] I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.900 --> 01:18:10.900] I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:18:10.900 --> 01:18:13.900] And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.900 --> 01:18:20.900] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.900 --> 01:18:22.900] How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.900 --> 01:18:24.900] Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.900 --> 01:18:29.900] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.900 --> 01:18:31.900] First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.900 --> 01:18:34.900] Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.900 --> 01:18:37.900] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.900 --> 01:18:43.900] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.900 --> 01:18:44.900] Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.900 --> 01:18:45.900] No.
[01:18:45.900 --> 01:18:47.900] Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.900 --> 01:18:48.900] No.
[01:18:48.900 --> 01:18:49.900] Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:18:49.900 --> 01:18:50.900] No.
[01:18:50.900 --> 01:18:51.900] I mean yes.
[01:18:51.900 --> 01:18:52.900] Wow.
[01:18:52.900 --> 01:18:54.900] Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.900 --> 01:18:55.900] This is perfect.
[01:18:55.900 --> 01:18:56.900] Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.900 --> 01:18:58.900] We are Logos.
[01:18:58.900 --> 01:19:22.900] Happy Holidays Logos.
[01:19:22.900 --> 01:19:43.900] All right folks, we are back.
[01:19:43.900 --> 01:19:48.900] This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:48.900 --> 01:19:53.900] We have 45 minutes left in the show and we are currently talking to Ralph in Texas.
[01:19:53.900 --> 01:19:56.900] All right, Ralph, please continue.
[01:19:56.900 --> 01:19:58.900] I can't.
[01:19:58.900 --> 01:20:00.900] Don't remember where I was at.
[01:20:00.900 --> 01:20:03.900] Well, that's not helpful.
[01:20:03.900 --> 01:20:10.900] Well, I guess if anything, just try to understand more about these criminal complaints because I would really like to do that.
[01:20:10.900 --> 01:20:14.900] I didn't do the T-Close Complaints on that Randy talks about.
[01:20:14.900 --> 01:20:16.900] I'm hoping I'm not going to be too late on those.
[01:20:16.900 --> 01:20:20.900] Well, T-Close relates to law enforcement, not the judges.
[01:20:20.900 --> 01:20:21.900] Correct.
[01:20:21.900 --> 01:20:25.900] I understand that, but it's just one of those complaints that I haven't done.
[01:20:25.900 --> 01:20:28.900] I've done several complaints on attorneys and have all been rejected, of course.
[01:20:28.900 --> 01:20:35.900] I have done some judicial complaints on two judges and they were both rejected as well.
[01:20:35.900 --> 01:20:41.900] Of course, but Randy explains that very well and when he's talking about it, it doesn't matter.
[01:20:41.900 --> 01:20:43.900] As long as you made the complaint, that's the main thing.
[01:20:43.900 --> 01:20:48.900] They are automatically going to reject them, but at least they go on their file.
[01:20:48.900 --> 01:20:55.900] So, I did a criminal complaint on an attorney with, oh boy, so many departments.
[01:20:55.900 --> 01:21:05.900] With a department, I don't remember what department was, a special investigations division that an FBI agent had told me to file with.
[01:21:05.900 --> 01:21:16.900] And I did that and they told me that I mailed it to the wrong agency to try another agency and I haven't got around to doing it.
[01:21:16.900 --> 01:21:18.900] That's probably enough on that.
[01:21:18.900 --> 01:21:26.900] So, there's lots of things we can do, but I'm doing some of them, what can I say?
[01:21:26.900 --> 01:21:31.900] So, these criminal complaints on judges that act unruly.
[01:21:31.900 --> 01:21:42.900] The grand jury, I'm not really sure how many find out about the grand jury because a lot of these prosecutors don't want to know when the grand jury is making a where.
[01:21:42.900 --> 01:21:44.900] It makes it something about certified mail.
[01:21:44.900 --> 01:21:45.900] That sounds good.
[01:21:45.900 --> 01:21:48.900] I don't remember hearing that before.
[01:21:48.900 --> 01:22:03.900] So, if a judge, let's say a person is arrested and instead of being taken before magistrates are taken directly to jail, well, that's 15.17 violations.
[01:22:03.900 --> 01:22:10.900] But then the judge signs a warrant for an arrest when there is no probable cause.
[01:22:10.900 --> 01:22:14.900] The case is later dismissed because there is no probable cause.
[01:22:14.900 --> 01:22:17.900] Have they also abused their office or is that purely?
[01:22:17.900 --> 01:22:20.900] Yeah, that's official oppression and abuse of official capacity.
[01:22:20.900 --> 01:22:23.900] That's two of the charges that I've got right here in this document.
[01:22:23.900 --> 01:22:25.900] Okay, that's what I was thinking.
[01:22:25.900 --> 01:22:38.900] Not to mention it's falsification of the court record because the judge signed a warrant knowing there was no proper probable cause statement, but he signed a warrant as if there weren't.
[01:22:38.900 --> 01:22:39.900] I did do that.
[01:22:39.900 --> 01:22:40.900] I worded it differently.
[01:22:40.900 --> 01:22:43.900] I remember that was quite a while back, okay?
[01:22:43.900 --> 01:22:50.900] Because the arresting officer, he'd made perjury and aggravated perjury.
[01:22:50.900 --> 01:22:56.900] Perjury when he lied under oath, aggravated perjury whenever he lied on papers that were going through a court.
[01:22:56.900 --> 01:22:59.900] You know, that wasn't that popular, but any official...
[01:22:59.900 --> 01:23:01.900] Well, actually, you've got that backwards.
[01:23:01.900 --> 01:23:08.900] Aggravated perjury occurs when it was done under oath, whether verbally or in writing.
[01:23:08.900 --> 01:23:18.900] Perjury is when you put it down without being under oath or swearing to it but giving false answers anyway.
[01:23:18.900 --> 01:23:21.900] So that's the difference between perjury and aggravated perjury.
[01:23:21.900 --> 01:23:29.900] Aggravated perjury can only occur when a person is under oath to tell the truth and does not.
[01:23:29.900 --> 01:23:36.900] And that the intent of that falsification is to cause harm to another.
[01:23:36.900 --> 01:23:40.900] I'm getting confused with something about court proceedings.
[01:23:40.900 --> 01:23:45.900] And something intended to be in court proceedings is they get special or something like that.
[01:23:45.900 --> 01:23:48.900] Well, when you take the stand to testify, you're doing it under oath.
[01:23:48.900 --> 01:23:54.900] When you file a written document for probable cause, it has to be done under oath.
[01:23:54.900 --> 01:24:05.900] That hints those things constitute aggravated perjury if they're wrong and you know they're wrong.
[01:24:05.900 --> 01:24:15.900] Whereas that's why the criminal complaint itself is not signed under penalty of perjury in any capacity.
[01:24:15.900 --> 01:24:23.900] It's also why you are protected from making a criminal allegation against anyone, whether it's false or not.
[01:24:23.900 --> 01:24:31.900] Because they don't want to prevent people from being able to file a criminal complaint based upon what they think is true.
[01:24:31.900 --> 01:24:35.900] Even if they don't know for a fact that it is true.
[01:24:35.900 --> 01:24:50.900] And since perjury can only be done under oath based upon personal knowledge and the criminal complaint is not required to be signed by someone with personal knowledge, the two do not go together.
[01:24:50.900 --> 01:24:57.900] So that's the difference between a criminal complaint being available for a charge of perjury.
[01:24:57.900 --> 01:25:16.900] It's not versus something else such as an affidavit of probable cause or putting a false record into the court record itself, a false document that contains statement of fact that is required to be done in an official capacity.
[01:25:16.900 --> 01:25:20.900] Which means it's done under your official oath.
[01:25:20.900 --> 01:25:27.900] Because it's performed as part of your official duties, hence it's under your oath.
[01:25:27.900 --> 01:25:37.900] Okay, so those things would constitute aggravated perjury if they're done with the intent to harm another.
[01:25:37.900 --> 01:25:38.900] Oh, okay.
[01:25:38.900 --> 01:25:42.900] That does shine a little bit of different light on it, okay.
[01:25:42.900 --> 01:25:46.900] Well, if you've got time, let me ask you about a case.
[01:25:46.900 --> 01:25:49.900] I don't have the name of the case, but maybe you're familiar with it.
[01:25:49.900 --> 01:26:01.900] The thing is that an officer's near mistake in charging does not make him liable for civil damages.
[01:26:01.900 --> 01:26:13.900] Okay, so in other words, if he arrests for something like, which I'm seeing there's a lot of this in Texas, is arrest for failure to identify when failure to identify is not an arrestable offense.
[01:26:13.900 --> 01:26:17.900] But then they'll come back and they'll say, well, the person was also trespassing.
[01:26:17.900 --> 01:26:23.900] They'll come up with something real or not and they'll say, okay, well, the person could have been arrested for some other thing.
[01:26:23.900 --> 01:26:43.900] Yeah, and that's a doctrine concocted by the United States Supreme Court that basically negates the officer's wrongdoing because there was another potential wrongdoing that the officer could have addressed under the same circumstances and do it the same way.
[01:26:43.900 --> 01:26:53.900] The problem there is, of course, is that that's virtually impossible to prove because it's simply a decisional statement by the officer.
[01:26:53.900 --> 01:26:56.900] Well, I could have charged him with this, but I didn't.
[01:26:56.900 --> 01:27:01.900] Now, how do you prove at that juncture that you could have charged him with this offense?
[01:27:01.900 --> 01:27:04.900] You just chose not to.
[01:27:04.900 --> 01:27:10.900] Basically, what it is is a get out of liability free card.
[01:27:10.900 --> 01:27:28.900] Well, right, so working on an argument, the counter that would be, let's see, unless I think part of that same case is that covers officers accepting cases where a plane in competence or indifference to the law.
[01:27:28.900 --> 01:27:33.900] It doesn't cover an officer for a brain competence or indifference to the law.
[01:27:33.900 --> 01:27:36.900] Something that any other officer would normally...
[01:27:36.900 --> 01:27:42.900] Well, there's several cases that have done this.
[01:27:42.900 --> 01:27:44.900] It basically comes down to the same thing.
[01:27:44.900 --> 01:27:50.900] Cops now have a claim of ignorance of law as a protection for their wrongdoing.
[01:27:50.900 --> 01:27:54.900] And there's been several recent cases where that has occurred.
[01:27:54.900 --> 01:27:57.900] One of them, I forget, it's either Rodriguez or Gonzalez.
[01:27:57.900 --> 01:28:07.900] It occurred up in one of the northeastern states, the deputy pulled over a truck because it only had one working brake light.
[01:28:07.900 --> 01:28:12.900] And he insisted it had to have two when the statute said it only required one.
[01:28:12.900 --> 01:28:23.900] And the court ruled that his mistake of law was not grounds to dismiss the charges or to claim that the stop itself was unlawful.
[01:28:23.900 --> 01:28:28.900] Simply because the officer was mistaken about the requirement in the law.
[01:28:28.900 --> 01:28:35.900] So what the court actually ruled upon was, yeah, cops can be stupid and ignorant and it's okay for them to be that way.
[01:28:35.900 --> 01:28:47.900] But now had you actually required to and you not have known that and been driving around on one, you would still be just as guilty and can't claim ignorance as an excuse.
[01:28:47.900 --> 01:28:52.900] You can't even claim ignorance of knowing that the light was out.
[01:28:52.900 --> 01:28:57.900] See, it's a double standard is what they've created.
[01:28:57.900 --> 01:29:01.900] One for them, one for us.
[01:29:01.900 --> 01:29:02.900] Right.
[01:29:02.900 --> 01:29:07.900] Well, all right, let me balance an argument off of you and see if you like any parts of it.
[01:29:07.900 --> 01:29:14.900] You've got quite a bit more experience than just for me, but I did do a fair amount of reading on it.
[01:29:14.900 --> 01:29:22.900] So let's stick with the one that used most often arresting for failure to identify.
[01:29:22.900 --> 01:29:29.900] Well, it is so obvious that failure to identify is not an arrestable offense.
[01:29:29.900 --> 01:29:33.900] No, it's not an original arrestable offense.
[01:29:33.900 --> 01:29:38.900] It's not a sole arrestable offense.
[01:29:38.900 --> 01:29:41.900] Therein lies the rub.
[01:29:41.900 --> 01:29:44.900] It's an ancillary charge.
[01:29:44.900 --> 01:29:45.900] Correct.
[01:29:45.900 --> 01:29:48.900] It is always an ancillary charge.
[01:29:48.900 --> 01:29:49.900] Right.
[01:29:49.900 --> 01:29:50.900] Okay.
[01:29:50.900 --> 01:29:51.900] All right.
[01:29:51.900 --> 01:29:52.900] Hang on just a second, Ralph.
[01:29:52.900 --> 01:29:53.900] I got another break here.
[01:29:53.900 --> 01:29:54.900] Okay.
[01:29:54.900 --> 01:29:55.900] Okay.
[01:29:55.900 --> 01:29:56.900] All right, folks.
[01:29:56.900 --> 01:29:57.900] We'll be right back after this break.
[01:29:57.900 --> 01:30:01.900] Y'all hang in.
[01:30:01.900 --> 01:30:05.900] Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.
[01:30:05.900 --> 01:30:07.900] Whoever came up with that was sure wrong.
[01:30:07.900 --> 01:30:13.900] All right, and I'll be back in a moment to explain how your first, middle, and last names can actually affect your mortality.
[01:30:13.900 --> 01:30:21.900] Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches, and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:21.900 --> 01:30:22.900] That's creepy.
[01:30:22.900 --> 01:30:24.900] But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:24.900 --> 01:30:27.900] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:27.900 --> 01:30:33.900] Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies, and their third party certified.
[01:30:33.900 --> 01:30:37.900] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:37.900 --> 01:30:40.900] Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:40.900 --> 01:30:43.900] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:43.900 --> 01:30:47.900] The initials of your name could significantly impact how long you live.
[01:30:47.900 --> 01:30:56.900] According to a University of California study, positive initials like VIP or ACE could add more than four years to a man's life.
[01:30:56.900 --> 01:31:02.900] Negative initials like PIG or DIE could shorten a man's life by two years.
[01:31:02.900 --> 01:31:08.900] While women are less impacted by negative initials than men, positive initials can add three years to their lives.
[01:31:08.900 --> 01:31:15.900] Researchers believe initials are powerful symbols that affect how people are treated and how they feel about themselves, and research supports it.
[01:31:15.900 --> 01:31:21.900] Those with negative initials were more likely to commit suicide and die in accidents than those with positive initials.
[01:31:21.900 --> 01:31:23.900] So name your kids well.
[01:31:23.900 --> 01:31:29.900] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:29.900 --> 01:31:31.900] I lost my son.
[01:31:31.900 --> 01:31:32.900] My uncle.
[01:31:32.900 --> 01:31:33.900] My son.
[01:31:33.900 --> 01:31:38.900] On September 11, 2000, most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:38.900 --> 01:31:42.900] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:42.900 --> 01:31:46.900] I will be official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[01:31:46.900 --> 01:31:52.900] Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:52.900 --> 01:31:53.900] Bring justice to my son.
[01:31:53.900 --> 01:31:54.900] My uncle.
[01:31:54.900 --> 01:31:55.900] My nephew.
[01:31:55.900 --> 01:31:56.900] My son.
[01:31:56.900 --> 01:31:57.900] Go to building what.org.
[01:31:57.900 --> 01:32:00.900] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:00.900 --> 01:32:02.900] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:02.900 --> 01:32:05.900] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:05.900 --> 01:32:10.900] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:10.900 --> 01:32:13.900] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:13.900 --> 01:32:20.900] That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:20.900 --> 01:32:26.900] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.900 --> 01:32:31.900] We trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.900 --> 01:32:37.900] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:37.900 --> 01:32:44.900] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:44.900 --> 01:32:49.900] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:49.900 --> 01:32:55.900] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:55.900 --> 01:33:00.900] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:00.900 --> 01:33:29.900] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:30.900 --> 01:33:45.900] Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:45.900 --> 01:33:51.900] Pat Charles, I do see y'all on the board. Please hang in there and I'll get to you just as quickly as I can.
[01:33:51.900 --> 01:33:55.900] I want to see if I can get this wrapped up with Ralph. Alright, Ralph.
[01:33:55.900 --> 01:34:03.900] Okay, what I was thinking was they're saying officers' mere mistake in the law does not make any sense reliable, okay?
[01:34:03.900 --> 01:34:12.900] Now, mere mistake in the law, something as simple as 3802 failure to identify is not an arrestable offense,
[01:34:12.900 --> 01:34:16.900] then they're not making a mere mistake of the law.
[01:34:16.900 --> 01:34:17.900] Correct.
[01:34:17.900 --> 01:34:22.900] Actually incompetent. They're incompetent and or indifferent to the law. That's what I'm arguing about.
[01:34:22.900 --> 01:34:29.900] That's what you have to allege. That's correct. Don't ever allege that they were mistaken or that they committed a mistake.
[01:34:29.900 --> 01:34:38.900] You always allege that they either disregarded or are incompetent in the law.
[01:34:38.900 --> 01:34:39.900] Okay.
[01:34:39.900 --> 01:34:45.900] So you're absolutely right there because that's the only grounds upon which your suit will gain any traction.
[01:34:45.900 --> 01:34:55.900] Okay. Now, you mentioned a word earlier. I can't think of it. I'll go back and listen to the recording. But you said that that's what they're alleging.
[01:34:55.900 --> 01:34:59.900] They're hoping they're deciding. Okay. Whatever that word was you used. Yes, that is what they're doing.
[01:34:59.900 --> 01:35:09.900] So what we can do is we can say, wait a minute, we have to have a judicial determination as to whether or not that was merely a mistake in the charging instrument
[01:35:09.900 --> 01:35:16.900] or if it was intentional. Now, wouldn't that be fair? I mean, they're saying an officer's made a mistake and I'm going, okay, well, let's see.
[01:35:16.900 --> 01:35:18.900] Shouldn't we have a judicial decision?
[01:35:18.900 --> 01:35:28.900] Well, now, wait a minute. You're talking about two different things. You're talking about what the officer does to arrest you and make the false allegation
[01:35:28.900 --> 01:35:37.900] versus how that statement was prepared in the written complaint to go along with the charging instrument.
[01:35:37.900 --> 01:35:46.900] Those are two separate things. Don't try to push them together because they're completely different things.
[01:35:46.900 --> 01:35:48.900] You lost them.
[01:35:48.900 --> 01:35:57.900] Okay. The officer's actions at the time of the arrest, you can base your incompetence and disregard claims on. Okay.
[01:35:57.900 --> 01:35:58.900] Okay.
[01:35:58.900 --> 01:36:04.900] The written instrument may have not even been prepared by the officer.
[01:36:04.900 --> 01:36:11.900] The clerk may have typed it up. The prosecutor may have typed it up and just asked the officer to sign it.
[01:36:11.900 --> 01:36:19.900] That doesn't make the officer culpable for what it says or liable for anything in it that's incorrect.
[01:36:19.900 --> 01:36:36.900] Ah, good point. Very good point. Okay. I understand now. I understand. Okay. I missed the first time. Okay. However, even that said, I'm going to push for a judicial determination that the officer's made a mistake in the charging instrument
[01:36:36.900 --> 01:36:45.900] if the officer did that. If the officer made the charging instrument, then I think there's a, I don't know, I'm going to at least try it anyway, push for a judicial decision.
[01:36:45.900 --> 01:36:49.900] Well, hey, we got to decide if we're going to make a mere mistake because you got to say if we made a mere mistake.
[01:36:49.900 --> 01:36:54.900] Okay. Here's where you're going to run into an issue if you don't pay attention to it.
[01:36:54.900 --> 01:36:55.900] Okay.
[01:36:55.900 --> 01:37:07.900] A mere mistake is simply failing to cite the proper or all of the necessary elements relating to the allegation, which would void the complaint if you raise the issue and object to it.
[01:37:07.900 --> 01:37:12.900] Okay. Which means they can correct it and refile it.
[01:37:12.900 --> 01:37:18.900] None of that's punishable. Okay. Can't do anything about that. That's a mistake.
[01:37:18.900 --> 01:37:33.900] However, if the officer falsifies any of the elements of that charge in the written instrument, that is perjury and aggravated perjury. That is a crime.
[01:37:33.900 --> 01:37:36.900] Okay. You understand the distinction here?
[01:37:36.900 --> 01:37:44.900] Yeah. I believe so, yes. Okay. So a mistake is not something you want the court to rule on because it's too easy to say it's a mistake.
[01:37:44.900 --> 01:37:51.900] All it has to be is an omission of a factor element that is pertinent to the charge and it's a mistake.
[01:37:51.900 --> 01:37:59.900] But when it is a false statement, that's a horse of a different color entirely.
[01:37:59.900 --> 01:38:10.900] Well, I'm going on the presumption that it is obviously not a mistake. So if the defense is...
[01:38:10.900 --> 01:38:13.900] No, you're not listening to me, Ralph.
[01:38:13.900 --> 01:38:15.900] Okay. One minute.
[01:38:15.900 --> 01:38:23.900] You can't say it's not a mistake if it's an omission of a fact or an element. Okay.
[01:38:23.900 --> 01:38:27.900] You can't make the allegation that it's intentional regardless.
[01:38:27.900 --> 01:38:38.900] It will not fly because that aspect of making a criminal complaint is not punishable in any way, shape, or form.
[01:38:38.900 --> 01:38:49.900] Because everything in that complaint is based upon belief, not personal knowledge, even if the person signing it does have personal knowledge.
[01:38:49.900 --> 01:38:55.900] That would create a double standard in filing complaints, which they're not going to do.
[01:38:55.900 --> 01:39:15.900] Okay. The only recourse you have in claiming that there is something actionable in the complaint is when one or more of the facts are knowingly false.
[01:39:15.900 --> 01:39:16.900] Okay.
[01:39:16.900 --> 01:39:23.900] For instance, let's say the officer said that this occurred yesterday.
[01:39:23.900 --> 01:39:33.900] Okay. Knowing full well that this event occurred two years ago beyond the statute of limitations.
[01:39:33.900 --> 01:39:41.900] Not only could that be raised as an issue of, wait a minute, this is not only a mistake of the date, it is an actual false statement,
[01:39:41.900 --> 01:39:47.900] a knowingly false statement about the date of the event.
[01:39:47.900 --> 01:39:59.900] See the distinction there? Whereas if he's within it and he just simply goes, well, I think it was approximately three days ago on the 20th when this happened.
[01:39:59.900 --> 01:40:03.900] And it actually was on the 19th or the 18th or the 17th.
[01:40:03.900 --> 01:40:07.900] That is not going to be anything other than a simple mistake.
[01:40:07.900 --> 01:40:13.900] And I guarantee you they're never going to list it as anything other than a simple mistake.
[01:40:13.900 --> 01:40:24.900] The only way you can raise that type of issue is if you can show that the difference in the dates affects the outcome of the complaint to begin with from the very beginning,
[01:40:24.900 --> 01:40:27.900] such as being outside the statute of limitations.
[01:40:27.900 --> 01:40:35.900] Then you can raise the issue that it was knowingly false so as to allow the complaint to go forward knowing the statute of limitations had expired,
[01:40:35.900 --> 01:40:40.900] which means this guy committed aggravated perjury when he signed it.
[01:40:40.900 --> 01:40:41.900] Okay.
[01:40:41.900 --> 01:40:46.900] Yeah, I'm going to have to study over this a little bit because it sounds like there's some new things there that I could...
[01:40:46.900 --> 01:40:59.900] Well, there's nothing new except maybe to you, but that's just simple straight up common sense there that certain mistakes are irrelevant to you trying to raise them as an issue of wrongdoing,
[01:40:59.900 --> 01:41:01.900] which is what you're trying to get to.
[01:41:01.900 --> 01:41:02.900] Okay.
[01:41:02.900 --> 01:41:03.900] Okay.
[01:41:03.900 --> 01:41:07.900] The judge in my case has already said that the officer lied on the complaint.
[01:41:07.900 --> 01:41:08.900] He's already said that.
[01:41:08.900 --> 01:41:17.900] Yeah, but in order for the officer to lie, the officer has to have done exactly what I said, falsified one or more facts.
[01:41:17.900 --> 01:41:19.900] That's the only way to lie.
[01:41:19.900 --> 01:41:22.900] Well, then how can they come back and say that?
[01:41:22.900 --> 01:41:27.900] Well, it's okay because he could have been arrested for something else and the officers never...
[01:41:27.900 --> 01:41:32.900] That's the negating doctrine that the Supreme Court came up with.
[01:41:32.900 --> 01:41:45.900] You need to... I forget exactly what the specific name of that is, but you need to look at those cases because what they basically said is if the officer could have arrested for something else,
[01:41:45.900 --> 01:41:58.900] then he's protected in certain other instances for his actions, even if those actions turn out to be wrongful, because he still could have relied on this to do the same thing.
[01:41:58.900 --> 01:42:02.900] Unless, of course, he was incompetent or in total indifference to the law.
[01:42:02.900 --> 01:42:03.900] What?
[01:42:03.900 --> 01:42:06.900] No, different thing.
[01:42:06.900 --> 01:42:12.900] You would have had to have shown that he did not have the protection of the other alleged defense to back him up.
[01:42:12.900 --> 01:42:23.900] In other words, once again, that he is either incompetent in the assertion because there are no facts present to facilitate that complaint or that charge,
[01:42:23.900 --> 01:42:35.900] or he is knowingly falsifying the facts of the matter in order to establish the possibility of the existence of such a charge in order to protect himself.
[01:42:35.900 --> 01:42:37.900] It's exactly the same thing I've been saying.
[01:42:37.900 --> 01:42:43.900] He's lying by falsifying facts one way or the other.
[01:42:43.900 --> 01:42:53.900] If he's not doing that, then it will be a mistake of law, and if he did have everything where he could have charged you with something else but didn't,
[01:42:53.900 --> 01:43:07.900] he will be protected from suit because he could have had an alternative action that would allow him to do the same thing that he did in this case, even though this case is not correct.
[01:43:07.900 --> 01:43:17.900] It's not a proper way of doing law in my book. I would have never considered that to be a possibility, but the Supreme Court has.
[01:43:17.900 --> 01:43:24.900] If the Supreme Court's the one that ruled on it, there's no chance of a constitutional challenge or maybe a person...
[01:43:24.900 --> 01:43:31.900] Not unless you come up with a pertinent set of facts that does not comport itself with the outcome of their ruling.
[01:43:31.900 --> 01:43:43.900] In other words, you've got to show that there's an alternative here that that ruling did not consider when it was made that provides a get out of jail free card where a get out of jail free card should never exist.
[01:43:43.900 --> 01:43:47.900] Those are the words I hang my hat on. There's another alternative.
[01:43:47.900 --> 01:43:50.900] Yes, there's another alternative that was not considered at the time the demonstration was made.
[01:43:50.900 --> 01:43:55.900] All right, Ralph. I've got one segment left and I need to get to everybody else, man. I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to let you go, okay?
[01:43:55.900 --> 01:43:59.900] Y'all hang on, folks. We will be right back.
[01:43:59.900 --> 01:44:08.900] Nutritious food is real body armor. It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:08.900 --> 01:44:16.900] Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as a Schedule 1 drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:44:16.900 --> 01:44:22.900] People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:44:22.900 --> 01:44:29.900] So now you know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp. They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:29.900 --> 01:44:38.900] HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:38.900 --> 01:45:00.900] Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients. Call 888-910-4367. 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempUSA.org.
[01:45:00.900 --> 01:45:15.900] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.900 --> 01:45:23.900] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.900 --> 01:45:34.900] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.900 --> 01:45:43.900] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.900 --> 01:45:56.900] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.900 --> 01:46:14.900] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:27.900 --> 01:46:36.900] Alright folks, we are back. We are now in the last segment of our show for tonight.
[01:46:36.900 --> 01:46:41.900] And real quick, we have Pat in Texas. Pat, what can we do for you?
[01:46:41.900 --> 01:46:56.900] Eddie, first off, I just wrote you an email and just answered that. Yes sir, I just saw that and I just replied back to it.
[01:46:56.900 --> 01:47:12.900] You're going after a judge for Title 42 violation. Very hard to get through the courts. The easier way of doing it is file against the risk management insurance policy.
[01:47:12.900 --> 01:47:26.900] Every court is covered by, but covers the judge and all the judicial officers with a risk management policy. Just write everything down, send it into their insurance company.
[01:47:26.900 --> 01:47:31.900] They will more than willingly settle with you out of court.
[01:47:31.900 --> 01:47:39.900] Okay. Well, if you got any information on that, please send it over to me in an email. I'd love to see that and start trying to figure out how to make that work properly.
[01:47:39.900 --> 01:47:55.900] As far as this particular issue though, we have a good chance here with the Title 42 lawsuit because everything these judges are doing that I've made allegations for here are being done in their non-judicial capacity, which means immunity does not attach.
[01:47:55.900 --> 01:48:08.900] And because there was never a probable cause determination or proper filing to invoke the court's jurisdiction, they're acting without jurisdiction, which also means jeopardy does not attach.
[01:48:08.900 --> 01:48:22.900] But I agree the insurance would be a whole lot easier. I just don't know whether or not that would facilitate a way to penalize the judge, I guess, is the best way to put it.
[01:48:22.900 --> 01:48:39.900] Well, what happens a lot of times is the insurance company starts raising the rates to the point that one, either they can't pay them anymore or two, the insurance company will just drop them because they're uninsurable.
[01:48:39.900 --> 01:48:41.900] It depends on how much they have to pay out.
[01:48:41.900 --> 01:48:46.900] Yeah. And whether or not they're having to pay it out of their own pockets or buy something else.
[01:48:46.900 --> 01:48:51.900] Yeah. Because all of them are covered by risk management nowadays.
[01:48:51.900 --> 01:48:58.900] Okay. Yeah. If you've got information on that, I'd love to see it because I can certainly make hay with that if there's something in there to use.
[01:48:58.900 --> 01:49:16.900] Okay. I just thought I'd raise that as an alternative because the Title 42, unless you've got somebody to help you, unless you just want to spend a lot of time studying, that can be a very convoluted court case.
[01:49:16.900 --> 01:49:17.900] Yes.
[01:49:17.900 --> 01:49:19.900] It's not something that's simple.
[01:49:19.900 --> 01:49:29.900] Now, also FYI, if you don't mind, I'd like to tell folks a little bit about the case that you had that I helped you with if that's okay while you're on here.
[01:49:29.900 --> 01:49:30.900] No, that's fine.
[01:49:30.900 --> 01:49:31.900] Okay.
[01:49:31.900 --> 01:49:32.900] You'd be my guest.
[01:49:32.900 --> 01:49:43.900] Yeah, folks. Pat here is the gentleman that I assisted with a felony charge of evasion by use of a vehicle.
[01:49:43.900 --> 01:49:52.900] And they maliciously attempted to indict him without a criminal complaint ever being filed.
[01:49:52.900 --> 01:49:59.900] They falsified the information relative to the original stop where they attempted to pull him over.
[01:49:59.900 --> 01:50:19.900] And they were conducting interdiction drills and using the members of the public as test subjects for facilitating traffic stops that were going to be elevated to drug dog sniffs automatically.
[01:50:19.900 --> 01:50:32.900] And they were conducting these things in his county and preyed upon him in one of these instances via the DPS to pull him over and initiate this illegal stop.
[01:50:32.900 --> 01:50:33.900] Well, they spent...
[01:50:33.900 --> 01:50:37.900] The DPS were being paid by DHS directly.
[01:50:37.900 --> 01:50:38.900] Yeah.
[01:50:38.900 --> 01:50:41.900] They were being brought down with the knowledge of DPS.
[01:50:41.900 --> 01:50:48.900] And I had the director of DPS actually refuse a subpoena.
[01:50:48.900 --> 01:50:57.900] Now, in this, it was a little over a year, wasn't it, that they hadn't done anything in your case except threaten you?
[01:50:57.900 --> 01:50:58.900] Yeah.
[01:50:58.900 --> 01:51:03.900] And finally, I wrote up a motion for him to file.
[01:51:03.900 --> 01:51:08.900] And how I'm going to take him to dismiss the case after that motion was filed?
[01:51:08.900 --> 01:51:17.900] Well, actually, the whole thing took more than two and a half years, total time.
[01:51:17.900 --> 01:51:31.900] My wife was sworn in as a member of the grand jury on that very day that the new DA, it gets convoluted.
[01:51:31.900 --> 01:51:39.900] The assistant DA that had been prosecuting it got himself arrested for DWI, but they never charged him with DWI.
[01:51:39.900 --> 01:51:47.900] So we were going after him for malicious prosecution, and there was one other thing.
[01:51:47.900 --> 01:51:50.900] I don't remember the title of it, but it was...
[01:51:50.900 --> 01:51:52.900] Selective prosecution, too, wouldn't it?
[01:51:52.900 --> 01:51:55.900] Selective prosecution.
[01:51:55.900 --> 01:52:01.900] And my wife wrote that one up, sent it over to you.
[01:52:01.900 --> 01:52:02.900] That one was good.
[01:52:02.900 --> 01:52:05.900] And, you know, his never went to trial.
[01:52:05.900 --> 01:52:06.900] Oh, I'm sure.
[01:52:06.900 --> 01:52:07.900] Never.
[01:52:07.900 --> 01:52:14.900] It helps when you have a big broom to sweep your missed deeds under the rug like they do.
[01:52:14.900 --> 01:52:15.900] Oh, yeah.
[01:52:15.900 --> 01:52:16.900] Tell me about it.
[01:52:16.900 --> 01:52:24.900] It's a real thick carpet, but I got told that they were not going to give me a dismissal with prejudice,
[01:52:24.900 --> 01:52:28.900] and I told them, yeah, you're going to, we're not going to dismiss.
[01:52:28.900 --> 01:52:35.900] And I also got my bond back, and I got a bunch of other stuff, but we're not finished with them yet.
[01:52:35.900 --> 01:52:38.900] But I've been sick now for the last six months.
[01:52:38.900 --> 01:52:39.900] I won't start to hear that.
[01:52:39.900 --> 01:52:40.900] I basically left the house.
[01:52:40.900 --> 01:52:44.900] Oh, and FYI, folks, we did get a dismissal with prejudice.
[01:52:44.900 --> 01:52:45.900] They did sign that order.
[01:52:45.900 --> 01:52:46.900] They did send it over.
[01:52:46.900 --> 01:52:49.900] It is up on my blog.
[01:52:49.900 --> 01:52:50.900] Oh, yeah.
[01:52:50.900 --> 01:52:53.900] I got told by the court clerk they never do that.
[01:52:53.900 --> 01:53:00.900] And I smiled at her, and I said, Martha, they are going to do it, or we're going to go to court.
[01:53:00.900 --> 01:53:03.900] Yeah, in a whole different way.
[01:53:03.900 --> 01:53:05.900] Oh, yeah, we weren't going to stay.
[01:53:05.900 --> 01:53:07.900] And we dismissed.
[01:53:07.900 --> 01:53:15.900] We were accused for cause, three district court judges and the regional administrative judge,
[01:53:15.900 --> 01:53:21.900] even though, and we followed it with the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court,
[01:53:21.900 --> 01:53:24.900] because he's the one that administrates that.
[01:53:24.900 --> 01:53:32.900] And we followed it with a governor, because he's the one that picks the regional administrative judges.
[01:53:32.900 --> 01:53:36.900] He's the one that points them before your terms.
[01:53:36.900 --> 01:53:38.900] So we kind of notified everybody.
[01:53:38.900 --> 01:53:42.900] And then the U.S. Supreme Court too, they got a little nifty notice in the mail.
[01:53:42.900 --> 01:53:45.900] But you've got to keep going at them.
[01:53:45.900 --> 01:53:46.900] Yeah.
[01:53:46.900 --> 01:53:52.900] And a friend of mine told me about the risk management thing, and I've been digging into it.
[01:53:52.900 --> 01:53:53.900] I've got some information.
[01:53:53.900 --> 01:53:55.900] I'm not finished with it yet.
[01:53:55.900 --> 01:54:01.900] But as soon as I get everything compiled, I'm going to shoot you over a thumb drive with it.
[01:54:01.900 --> 01:54:04.900] It'll be easier than to upload it.
[01:54:04.900 --> 01:54:12.900] Because we're on satellite, and our bandwidth is very limited out here.
[01:54:12.900 --> 01:54:14.900] Even the telephone now is on.
[01:54:14.900 --> 01:54:18.900] They've come back with some really tight stuff.
[01:54:18.900 --> 01:54:27.900] But the way that they're paying DPS now, just for everybody to know, DPS is getting paid directly by DHS.
[01:54:27.900 --> 01:54:35.900] They're no longer paying the officers directly to come down to the border to do these stops and stuff the way they had been.
[01:54:35.900 --> 01:54:41.900] And the officers were bringing their wives down, staying in hotels, getting all the meals paid and everything else.
[01:54:41.900 --> 01:54:47.900] Driving their cruisers, wearing their uniforms while being paid by DHS.
[01:54:47.900 --> 01:54:50.900] That is another violation.
[01:54:50.900 --> 01:54:53.900] They're pretending to be a state trooper when they're not.
[01:54:53.900 --> 01:54:56.900] They're a federal contractor.
[01:54:56.900 --> 01:55:07.900] That's already been adjudicated once in Austin when they were doing some DWI stops and some other things.
[01:55:07.900 --> 01:55:10.900] That would be impersonating a public official, wouldn't it?
[01:55:10.900 --> 01:55:12.900] Or at least a state official?
[01:55:12.900 --> 01:55:18.900] A state official, a state law enforcement officer.
[01:55:18.900 --> 01:55:20.900] Which is a felony?
[01:55:20.900 --> 01:55:31.900] That's a felony because not only that, but it's aggravated. In my case, the aggravated assault on a senior citizen that's handicapped falls into play.
[01:55:31.900 --> 01:55:36.900] 25 to life, first time out, no chance for parole.
[01:55:36.900 --> 01:55:44.900] Yeah, which there should have been several border patrol and at least one DPS officer subjected to.
[01:55:44.900 --> 01:55:50.900] Yeah, and a couple of deputies that were also constables at the same time.
[01:55:50.900 --> 01:55:53.900] There we go, double dipping again.
[01:55:53.900 --> 01:56:00.900] Yeah, well, one of them is now the sheriff. But it just gets deeper and deeper.
[01:56:00.900 --> 01:56:03.900] That does not surprise me.
[01:56:03.900 --> 01:56:12.900] You just have to remain calm and cool and keep plugging forth and never give up.
[01:56:12.900 --> 01:56:14.900] Yes, sir, I do agree.
[01:56:14.900 --> 01:56:15.900] You guys have a good one.
[01:56:15.900 --> 01:56:17.900] All right, thanks for calling, Pat. I appreciate it.
[01:56:17.900 --> 01:56:18.900] Have you already answered the email?
[01:56:18.900 --> 01:56:19.900] Yes, sir, sure did.
[01:56:19.900 --> 01:56:21.900] You have a good evening and be safe, young man.
[01:56:21.900 --> 01:56:24.900] You and me too. Thank you.
[01:56:24.900 --> 01:56:31.900] All right, now we have Charles in Washington. Charles, I got two minutes and two minutes I can give you.
[01:56:31.900 --> 01:56:33.900] Okay, how are you right now? You doing?
[01:56:33.900 --> 01:56:34.900] I'm doing good.
[01:56:34.900 --> 01:56:37.900] That's two questions for you. You're good. I was going to email you.
[01:56:37.900 --> 01:56:46.900] The question I got to ask you was, oh, here it is. You told me something about three reasons for police to run your plate.
[01:56:46.900 --> 01:56:50.900] And one was on private property and I forgot the other two.
[01:56:50.900 --> 01:56:54.900] And the reasons for them to run your plate?
[01:56:54.900 --> 01:57:06.900] Yeah, my car is still being pounded. And they'll come up around my place and they say my car is abandoned when it's parked right in front of my apartment on Public Street.
[01:57:06.900 --> 01:57:14.900] Two days. So they don't tow four or five of my cars. I'd have better to send for your seminary to get to record on how to go to court.
[01:57:14.900 --> 01:57:19.900] Well, I don't recall saying there are three reasons why they can or will.
[01:57:19.900 --> 01:57:31.900] But what I have said in relation to that is where is their probable cause to access the information associated with the person to whom that plate belongs?
[01:57:31.900 --> 01:57:44.900] The issue here becomes that in every state it is illegal for those people to access those computer systems and the information they contain without probable cause of a crime.
[01:57:44.900 --> 01:58:00.900] So when they let the computer automatically scan that plate and access those records and put those records up in front of them, what probable cause existed for them to read the information in that record and to access it?
[01:58:00.900 --> 01:58:05.900] None. Not a zip. The car was just sitting there.
[01:58:05.900 --> 01:58:18.900] So that's the distinction between the court saying that the plate is public and they can read it versus accessing the information attached to the records in the database that they maintain.
[01:58:18.900 --> 01:58:29.900] Okay. All right. That was well. Okay. Well, and then the other one, have you ever heard of after David? When you get a ticket, you can go do it after David appears within a day or so.
[01:58:29.900 --> 01:58:36.900] Yeah, it's one of those after David's that I have people do in our cases. Send me an email, Charles. I'm out of time here, man.
[01:58:36.900 --> 01:58:44.900] All right. This has been Rule of Law Radio with your host Eddie Craig on the Monday Night Show. I want to thank you all for listening and for all of your kind contributions to keep us afloat.
[01:58:44.900 --> 01:58:49.900] Please keep giving because we really, really need it. Y'all take care, folks. Good night.
[01:59:14.900 --> 01:59:19.900] Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:44.900 --> 01:59:49.900] Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.