ROL_2018-05-14_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:07.800]  The following newsflash has brought to you by the low star lowdown, providing the daily
[00:07.800 --> 00:15.440]  bulletins for the commodities market, today's history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:15.440 --> 00:23.600]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.600 --> 00:31.760]  Watch for the 11th of April 2018, close with gold $1,353.22 an ounce, silver $16.68 an ounce,
[00:31.760 --> 00:41.600]  Texas crude $65.51 a barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80, bitcoin cash
[00:41.600 --> 00:55.520]  at $652.90, and finally litecoins at $114.34, a crypto coin.
[00:55.520 --> 01:02.640]  Today in history, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968,
[01:02.640 --> 01:07.440]  which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national
[01:07.440 --> 01:13.120]  origin. It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.120 --> 01:18.240]  in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business. Today
[01:18.240 --> 01:23.760]  in history.
[01:23.760 --> 01:27.920]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:27.920 --> 01:32.320]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which is
[01:32.320 --> 01:36.640]  being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:36.640 --> 01:41.840]  United States, and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence
[01:41.840 --> 01:47.040]  as of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any
[01:47.040 --> 01:51.200]  and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice
[01:51.200 --> 01:56.240]  and new and smart. Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal
[01:56.240 --> 02:01.040]  who kills his people and enjoys it. Many in the West, including President Trump, have been
[02:01.040 --> 02:05.760]  quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:05.760 --> 02:10.320]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the
[02:10.320 --> 02:14.400]  organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the sign of the chemical
[02:14.400 --> 02:19.040]  slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year
[02:19.040 --> 02:24.000]  civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[02:24.000 --> 02:28.720]  rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[02:28.720 --> 02:33.840]  notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels. No surprise then why Russian
[02:33.840 --> 02:39.440]  foreign minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at
[02:39.440 --> 02:44.720]  terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which has been fighting terrorists. Or is this a
[02:44.720 --> 02:49.200]  trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike? And then there will be no evidence for
[02:49.200 --> 03:04.800]  international inspectors to look at. This was Brick Roadie with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[03:19.200 --> 03:22.800]  When you call the cops, you get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[03:49.200 --> 03:53.280]  Making the poor commodity, profiting off of polity, and court of policy, supporting
[03:53.280 --> 03:58.080]  prison economy. Yeah, no one makes money when the violence stops. Hatin' duality is the way to
[03:58.080 --> 04:01.920]  make a criminal cross. Blood in the gutter is how to wish whether they credit the top.
[04:01.920 --> 04:04.800]  And that's why this is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:04.800 --> 04:10.000]  This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:10.000 --> 04:15.200]  This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[04:15.200 --> 04:20.400]  This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:20.400 --> 04:25.200]  This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[04:25.200 --> 04:28.000]  Okay, what's your arrangement?
[04:28.000 --> 04:31.760]  I want the criminal system and these things try to murder me. They made me, they did me,
[04:31.760 --> 04:35.920]  they trained them to hate me. They grade and detain me and change us like slavery.
[04:35.920 --> 04:40.400]  Hands up, face down, left hook, right quit. Throw you down, hold you down, pack you with that
[04:40.400 --> 04:45.200]  nice shit, nice shit. Five browns, see you with your jeans on. You'll get sprayed on over skittles,
[04:45.200 --> 04:49.440]  where to trade on. All that people sayin' is it's crazy down in Florida. What you sayin' is you're
[04:49.440 --> 04:53.840]  playin' is the same in California. They're gangin' like they bangin' and they'll hang you down in Georgia.
[04:53.840 --> 04:57.760]  Praying you in the game for what you say without a lawyer. Formin' with no warrant and now they
[04:57.760 --> 05:01.520]  source it to your residence. Formin' with no warrant, now they're sortin' all the evidence.
[05:01.520 --> 05:06.800]  You better just learn to dodge a box. Cause this is what happens when you call the cops.
[05:06.800 --> 05:14.320]  This is what happens when you call the cops. This is when you call the cops. You
[05:14.320 --> 05:19.200]  get your rights violated or you fall, you shot 10. This is what happens when you call the cops.
[05:20.880 --> 05:24.480]  This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops.
[05:24.480 --> 05:28.720]  You get your rights violated. All right, folks, good evening. This is The Monday Night Rule of
[05:28.720 --> 05:36.720]  Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig. It is May 14th, 2018. We are live
[05:36.720 --> 05:42.680]  tonight, though we can say honestly we do not know for how long. Here's the
[05:42.680 --> 05:49.320]  problem folks. We are out of money and when I say out of money, I mean you can
[05:49.320 --> 05:54.040]  afford a bigger lunch than we can pay for right now. Now that's not anyone's
[05:54.040 --> 05:57.440]  fault in particular out there in Radio Land, so please don't think we're
[05:57.440 --> 06:02.880]  blaming you for not supporting us, but we are at that time when once again we
[06:02.880 --> 06:08.680]  have to run a fundraiser to try to keep the network alive. We are now at a point
[06:08.680 --> 06:14.960]  where the the minutes on our telephones could run out before we even get to the
[06:14.960 --> 06:20.680]  end of this show. If that happens, I can't take callers. If that happens, I can't do
[06:20.680 --> 06:25.080]  anything so sit here on this thing and diatribe every week because I can't talk
[06:25.080 --> 06:30.880]  to any of you and you can't talk to us. So that being said, we have a new
[06:30.880 --> 06:36.240]  fundraiser for 2018 that's going right now. It's sponsored once again by Central
[06:36.240 --> 06:41.080]  Texas Gun Works who does a great job of giving us some great prizes for the
[06:41.080 --> 06:44.680]  drawings that we have at the end of these fundraisers. Right now we have a
[06:44.680 --> 06:51.320]  Spikes Tactical AR-15 rifle that is the grand prize in this drawing. Every
[06:51.320 --> 06:59.440]  twenty-five dollars donated gets you one entry into that drawing. Okay? If you
[06:59.440 --> 07:04.840]  don't have even twenty-five dollars to spare, then do five, do ten, do whatever
[07:04.840 --> 07:12.200]  you can do because every penny helps. If we could get several hundred people
[07:12.200 --> 07:18.560]  donating five dollars, that would keep us above water most of the time, but we
[07:18.560 --> 07:22.800]  know how the finances are for everybody out there just like they are for us. The
[07:22.800 --> 07:26.880]  big difference is a lot of you guys have regular jobs to go to that you can use
[07:26.880 --> 07:31.000]  to augment what you get. Some don't. I understand that too, so don't get me
[07:31.000 --> 07:35.560]  wrong. I'm not trying to pick on anybody in particular, but everything that we do
[07:35.560 --> 07:40.320]  here is geared towards supporting this network. We don't have external income
[07:40.320 --> 07:45.640]  jobs or anything of that type to help augment what we do here. We spend way
[07:45.640 --> 07:51.520]  too much time trying to help individual people, some who pay us, some who don't.
[07:51.520 --> 07:56.920]  Okay? We can't live that way any better than you can, but so many people keep
[07:56.920 --> 08:02.960]  expecting us to. So at some point if you want us to keep helping, you've got to
[08:02.960 --> 08:09.160]  help us in return. Whether that donation is one made directly to any one of us or
[08:09.160 --> 08:13.280]  whether that donation is made to the network as a whole to keep it on the
[08:13.280 --> 08:22.560]  air. If we aren't here, who are you going to come to for assistance? At least as
[08:22.560 --> 08:30.320]  inexpensively as you're able to do now. You donate $25 a month to us and you can
[08:30.320 --> 08:36.240]  call us any time of the week on the air and talk about whatever issue you've
[08:36.240 --> 08:39.800]  got. You can email us and generally if we've got a moment spare time, we will
[08:39.800 --> 08:44.600]  respond back to it through the course of the day or within a day or two at most
[08:44.600 --> 08:49.920]  usually. Try that with an attorney who may not call you back for weeks at a time
[08:49.920 --> 08:55.360]  and is dang sure going to charge you a lot more than $25 a month and won't give
[08:55.360 --> 09:00.040]  you the help that we will. Won't tell you the truth, won't tell you the facts and
[09:00.040 --> 09:04.720]  will do everything possible to make you as dependent upon them as possible. That
[09:04.720 --> 09:12.040]  keeps the money in their pocket. You don't get to keep it. We are your next
[09:12.040 --> 09:20.800]  best thing for a lot less money but we can't be there without being here and
[09:20.800 --> 09:28.240]  we can't be here without your financial support. It is that cut and dry. Okay? No
[09:28.240 --> 09:36.240]  money. No logos. No logos. No shows. No shows. You people are on your own every
[09:36.240 --> 09:41.760]  single day and having been there before, I'm going to say it straight up good
[09:41.760 --> 09:51.120]  luck. Okay? When I came on to this show, I went through all of the same rigmarole
[09:51.120 --> 09:56.680]  that everybody out there has and is up to this point. I had to learn all the
[09:56.680 --> 10:00.880]  things that were right to do and all the things that were not right to do. All the
[10:00.880 --> 10:06.440]  stuff that was complete and utter patronut malarkey and what was actual law,
[10:06.440 --> 10:12.520]  an actual procedure, an actual process. Now they don't always play by their own
[10:12.520 --> 10:17.800]  rules. I'll give you that one right up front but that again is one of the things
[10:17.800 --> 10:23.360]  that you get from us that you will never get from an attorney is information on
[10:23.360 --> 10:31.440]  how they are violating those rules and how to fight back. If you've listened to
[10:31.440 --> 10:36.720]  these shows on this network for any length of time, especially any of ours
[10:36.720 --> 10:40.240]  here on the rule law side of it when it comes to the legal things that you face
[10:40.240 --> 10:46.000]  day in and day out, you have to know that we are a benefit. You have to know that
[10:46.000 --> 10:51.520]  we have helped because a lot of you have told us we have helped, that you were
[10:51.520 --> 10:59.280]  successful specifically because of the information you got from us. Where would
[10:59.280 --> 11:05.640]  you have gotten it if we had not been here? Where will you get it when we are
[11:05.640 --> 11:14.000]  no longer here? Only you people out there can fix that problem and keep us where
[11:14.000 --> 11:19.080]  we need to be which is doing what we're doing and giving that information to you.
[11:19.080 --> 11:26.800]  Okay and in helping you wherever we can to do something with it. That being said
[11:26.800 --> 11:34.120]  an AR-15 is not a bad prize for 25 bucks. Okay so if you're lucky enough to win
[11:34.120 --> 11:40.000]  the drawing that $25 investment paid off in more ways than one. If you invest
[11:40.000 --> 11:44.120]  more than that you're still getting a better bargain in the end than you're
[11:44.120 --> 11:49.840]  ever going to get at the feet of an attorney and that's just straight up
[11:49.840 --> 11:55.760]  fact. Now that being said while we're talking about attorneys I've had an
[11:55.760 --> 11:59.880]  ongoing debate with one today on Facebook in between the stuff I've been
[11:59.880 --> 12:09.760]  working on and he is very good at proving why I say the things I do about the
[12:09.760 --> 12:17.320]  intentional blind spot attorneys have to facts and law. He has used every argument
[12:17.320 --> 12:22.840]  that you can think of to rewrite the statutes and the case law and the legal
[12:22.840 --> 12:28.400]  definitions to suit the argument he wants to make rather than the one that
[12:28.400 --> 12:34.680]  fits the law and he keeps saying that I'm not providing any court cases that
[12:34.680 --> 12:40.920]  define transportation as something applicable to only commerce when in
[12:40.920 --> 12:48.600]  fact I did do exactly that several times but at the same time he has provided
[12:48.600 --> 12:56.640]  absolutely no support for his assertion that it means something other or
[12:56.640 --> 13:04.280]  everything other than transportation i.e. commercial use of the roads. This is
[13:04.280 --> 13:10.560]  the kind of stuff that attorneys do. You have to prove your point I do not
[13:10.560 --> 13:16.640]  because I'm the attorney so my word is gold whether I can substantiate it or
[13:16.640 --> 13:23.840]  not and I don't play that game. You're not going to talk me out of an argument
[13:23.840 --> 13:30.320]  by throwing the Esquire title at me. You're not going to talk me out of an
[13:30.320 --> 13:34.040]  argument by telling me how long you went to law school and where you finished in
[13:34.040 --> 13:41.920]  your class because the leader of the stupid people does not promote you as
[13:41.920 --> 13:51.480]  being a good leader. Never has, never will. Okay this is the point where you want
[13:51.480 --> 13:55.320]  to tell somebody like this guy that he needs to take off that pair of ears he's
[13:55.320 --> 13:58.960]  using for decoration and put on the functional ones where he can listen to
[13:58.960 --> 14:06.280]  things because he's not making any sense when he makes an argument that there is
[14:06.280 --> 14:11.200]  nothing in law that supports it while trying to convince you that there's
[14:11.200 --> 14:15.000]  nothing in law that supports yours despite the fact that you have put it
[14:15.000 --> 14:22.360]  right in front of his face numerous times and what's really ironic is that
[14:22.360 --> 14:28.920]  this conversation began over a post that is part of one of three pieces of
[14:28.920 --> 14:32.680]  the new motion to dismiss that I've posted on Facebook for discussionary
[14:32.680 --> 14:37.960]  and learning purposes and this particular post had to do with the very fact
[14:37.960 --> 14:42.800]  that the courts and the prosecutors are committing fraud by attempting to
[14:42.800 --> 14:49.440]  redefine statute outside of the legislatively specified subject matter
[14:49.440 --> 14:55.760]  of transportation. They're trying to treat the offenses within the code as if
[14:55.760 --> 15:00.960]  they are separate subjects unto themselves that don't require relationship
[15:00.960 --> 15:06.040]  with the subject matter of transportation to be valid and applicable when in fact
[15:06.040 --> 15:13.360]  that is exactly the opposite of how it works. If they cannot be made relational
[15:13.360 --> 15:18.240]  to the subject of transportation by proving that the individual was
[15:18.240 --> 15:23.720]  engaging in transportation then you cannot prove a proper application of
[15:23.720 --> 15:29.320]  the statute or the alleged offense. This is true of any offense whether it's in a
[15:29.320 --> 15:35.600]  regulatory code like the transportation code or in the penal code. I even put
[15:35.600 --> 15:41.280]  that out there for him. He said that his argument was are you trying to say that
[15:41.280 --> 15:47.840]  Texas law does not apply to you in such and such cases and my reply back was
[15:47.840 --> 15:53.080]  very straightforward. There are plenty of laws on the books in Texas and
[15:53.080 --> 16:00.200]  elsewhere that are totally inapplicable to you or me. For instance, you cannot be
[16:00.200 --> 16:04.640]  charged under a commercial fishing statute if you are not commercially fishing
[16:04.640 --> 16:09.840]  can you? You cannot be charged with official oppression or abuse of official
[16:09.840 --> 16:14.800]  capacity unless it is first alleged and proven that you are a public official
[16:14.800 --> 16:22.160]  that is capable of committing that offense. He didn't have any reply to that.
[16:22.160 --> 16:26.800]  He had no answer. So what did he do? Typical attorney fashion. He completely
[16:26.800 --> 16:31.680]  ignored it and moved on to make a completely separate argument that
[16:31.680 --> 16:37.520]  completely ignored the foundation of that answer. This is how they do the things
[16:37.520 --> 16:44.240]  they do. When it doesn't work in their favor they obfuscate and deflect. When it
[16:44.240 --> 16:49.240]  does work in their favor they will hang on to it tooth and nail as if it is the
[16:49.240 --> 16:54.840]  last ounce of gold in the free world. All right folks we'll be right back after
[16:54.840 --> 16:58.360]  this break so y'all hanging in there.
[17:03.040 --> 17:09.560]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by
[17:09.560 --> 17:14.600]  Central Texas Gun Works. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:14.600 --> 17:20.640]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gun Works the
[17:20.640 --> 17:26.880]  grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors
[17:26.880 --> 17:32.680]  to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book Legal 101 you get four
[17:32.680 --> 17:37.560]  chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to
[17:37.560 --> 17:43.720]  win and remember every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the
[17:43.720 --> 17:48.360]  shows on Logos Radio Network support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you
[17:48.360 --> 17:53.440]  the best quality programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and
[17:53.440 --> 17:58.560]  other cryptocurrencies. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate
[17:58.560 --> 18:04.320]  today. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or
[18:04.320 --> 18:09.200]  even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meara's proven method.
[18:09.200 --> 18:13.360]  Michael Meara's has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and
[18:13.360 --> 18:17.680]  now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[18:17.680 --> 18:22.000]  on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when
[18:22.000 --> 18:26.320]  contacted by phones, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone
[18:26.320 --> 18:30.120]  calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the
[18:30.120 --> 18:35.000]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Meara's
[18:35.000 --> 18:39.440]  proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[18:39.440 --> 18:44.640]  consultation is available as well. For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.640 --> 18:48.720]  and click on the blue Michael Meara spanner or email Michael Meara's at
[18:48.720 --> 18:57.440]  yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.440 --> 19:11.440]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:27.440 --> 19:55.720]  All right folks this is rule of law radio. The
[19:55.720 --> 20:01.880]  call in number is 512-646-1984 if you want to call in and get in line with a
[20:01.880 --> 20:06.400]  question or just a comment. Now anyway back to what I was saying about this
[20:06.400 --> 20:14.400]  attorney on Facebook. He is constantly and he just now posted a case citation
[20:14.400 --> 20:19.760]  that is absolutely irrelevant to the whole thing he's arguing. He is arguing
[20:19.760 --> 20:23.680]  that this case citation supports his perspective that transportation means
[20:23.680 --> 20:27.960]  something other than commerce yet nothing in the citation he posted makes
[20:27.960 --> 20:35.480]  that argument or that claim or even infers it but because he can spin it to
[20:35.480 --> 20:42.480]  make his argument appear valid he cites it. What he completely ignores is the
[20:42.480 --> 20:48.200]  fact that the citation uses the terminology that is specific to the
[20:48.200 --> 20:55.480]  transportation code and when you are using the terminology defined by
[20:55.480 --> 21:03.280]  regulatory codes which are malum prohibitum statutes then the subject
[21:03.280 --> 21:10.520]  matter is a paramount element of whether or not that statute can be applied a
[21:10.520 --> 21:19.200]  part that he continuously wants to ignore. Go figure because that is the only way
[21:19.200 --> 21:25.400]  they can win the argument is by ignoring the one element that makes any other
[21:25.400 --> 21:33.120]  element possible and then simply allows it to be presumed to be true which is a
[21:33.120 --> 21:39.600]  violation of due process because the state is then not being required to
[21:39.600 --> 21:47.800]  provide notice or to assert or to prove the one element that makes any other
[21:47.800 --> 21:56.480]  offense and its elements possible. You get it? Without that subject matter you
[21:56.480 --> 22:01.600]  can't commit an offense that is specifically tied to that subject
[22:01.600 --> 22:06.160]  matter. That's why he keeps trying to argue that the subject matter applies
[22:06.160 --> 22:10.440]  above and beyond that of commercial use of the highways but I've already told
[22:10.440 --> 22:14.560]  him he will never be able to post a site to a case that specifically defines
[22:14.560 --> 22:21.520]  transportation as something applicable to other than a carrier which is a
[22:21.520 --> 22:28.080]  commercial business use of the highways. He just isn't going to be able to do it
[22:28.080 --> 22:34.320]  because it doesn't exist yet he posts a case citation that absolutely does not
[22:34.320 --> 22:40.480]  make his argument for him in any way shape or form. None. It argues about what
[22:40.480 --> 22:44.960]  the state's ability to license is. Doesn't argue what the definition of
[22:44.960 --> 22:49.680]  transportation is and thus what would make the licensing aspect of that case
[22:49.680 --> 23:00.120]  applicable. Or to who? Yet this is the kind of crap attorneys throw out there as
[23:00.120 --> 23:10.200]  if it is somehow valid when in fact it is anything but. Now see folks that little
[23:10.200 --> 23:14.440]  tidbit of information right there is worth a donation. You just learn more in
[23:14.440 --> 23:18.600]  this one and a half segments than these attorneys learn in their entire
[23:18.600 --> 23:24.480]  lifetime of law school of practice. Why? Because they never actually read the law.
[23:24.480 --> 23:30.040]  They never research its history. They never look at every aspect of it in its
[23:30.040 --> 23:35.400]  totality and cherry pick what they want to use to make the argument they want to
[23:35.400 --> 23:38.760]  make instead of the one that's proper.
[23:40.200 --> 23:45.440]  That's why they don't want us in their courts. That's why they made it where
[23:45.440 --> 23:48.880]  they are the only ones that are allowed to speak pretty much like being in a
[23:48.880 --> 23:54.400]  Catholic church. No one is allowed to tell someone else what the Bible is and
[23:54.400 --> 23:58.160]  most Catholic churches they've ever been in. They don't want you to read it
[23:58.160 --> 24:02.040]  yourself because they want to be able to tell you what it means and does control
[24:02.040 --> 24:08.960]  your interpretation. This is exactly how attorneys want to control the law and you.
[24:08.960 --> 24:24.200]  You get it? It's fraud, plain and simple. It is authoritarian fraud. So what are we
[24:24.200 --> 24:28.960]  going to do about it? Well, I made my choice. That's why I'm right here where I
[24:28.960 --> 24:37.880]  am right now. Dirt poor, broke and wishing for more that I know I'm never
[24:37.880 --> 24:42.400]  going to get unless something drastically changes. So unless we suddenly go
[24:42.400 --> 24:45.920]  national and pick up a whole bunch of money sponsors that's not likely to
[24:45.920 --> 24:52.320]  happen anytime soon. But I'm here anyway. I'm here because it's the right thing to
[24:52.320 --> 25:01.880]  do and the right place to be to do it. Where are you? Where will you be? Where
[25:01.880 --> 25:08.280]  will we be if not for you? And of course whatever money you can throw our
[25:08.280 --> 25:14.640]  direction to keep us here. Not because we get paid with it, cause we don't. I have
[25:14.640 --> 25:21.320]  never gotten paid one penny for doing this show. Not one. That's not the fault
[25:21.320 --> 25:27.320]  of the network. The network was made to be here by volunteers. But the network
[25:27.320 --> 25:31.640]  has to be supported too. So those of us that are on here doing shows, we have to
[25:31.640 --> 25:36.360]  pay the network to do the shows. The way I pay the network is to share in what
[25:36.360 --> 25:41.680]  comes out of the seminar materials. The way I help pay the network is to sit here
[25:41.680 --> 25:45.320]  and tell you about the fundraisers when they have them. To hit you up for
[25:45.320 --> 25:54.640]  donations because without them none of us are here. We have to work together if
[25:54.640 --> 26:01.040]  we're going to be effective. That's simple. All right now there is approximately
[26:01.040 --> 26:04.440]  four minutes left before the next break. I am going to go ahead and start with a
[26:04.440 --> 26:08.440]  couple callers we got up on the board beginning with Andrew in
[26:08.440 --> 26:13.960]  Pennsylvania. Andrew what do you have? Yeah I got a couple things Eddie. First of all
[26:13.960 --> 26:18.040]  Dave Champion about the whole citizenship question on the census thing. I
[26:18.040 --> 26:22.200]  think Dave Champion may be missing something and I just needed to ask
[26:22.200 --> 26:25.360]  you about this because I need to get what you think is and what the truth is.
[26:25.360 --> 26:29.480]  Well I don't know what Dave has said about it so I haven't seen any of the
[26:29.480 --> 26:34.200]  post he's made or comments so I don't know how to context what he's saying. He
[26:34.200 --> 26:39.080]  basically said you might as well say yes to the are you a U.S. citizen
[26:39.080 --> 26:42.680]  question. Of course anybody who studies the work of Jordan Maxwell and others
[26:42.680 --> 26:46.760]  would say that's the last thing you want to do because United States that's the
[26:46.760 --> 26:51.360]  United States private corporation. Oh wait stop stop stop stop stop stop. How
[26:51.360 --> 26:55.520]  many times have you heard me tell you on this show that I have found no less than
[26:55.520 --> 27:00.800]  26 different definitions of the United States in federal law? How many times have
[27:00.800 --> 27:07.040]  I said that? Many times. Okay so out of the 26 definitions can you say
[27:07.040 --> 27:12.160]  definitively in relation to the information you're asking about which of
[27:12.160 --> 27:20.480]  those 26 is actually applicable? Well the cut and dry answer Andrew if you're
[27:20.480 --> 27:26.760]  going to be honest is no you cannot right? No I can't. Okay and because you can't
[27:26.760 --> 27:33.440]  you don't know if Dave's response is accurate or not do you? Because one of
[27:33.440 --> 27:38.840]  the definitions most certainly is applicable to the people of the several
[27:38.840 --> 27:46.200]  states. Okay? Okay. While many of the others are not because of the context and
[27:46.200 --> 27:54.840]  subject matter in which they are used and defined. Yeah. Okay so because of that I
[27:54.840 --> 28:01.520]  cannot comment on his response because I don't know specifically which laws
[28:01.520 --> 28:07.160]  you're referring to and which of those potential definitions is actually being
[28:07.160 --> 28:12.680]  applied. If I had time to research that I could answer your question. Otherwise
[28:12.680 --> 28:17.600]  I'm simply doing what too many people are already doing and I am making an
[28:17.600 --> 28:24.160]  argument based upon an opinion or a guess. Not a fact. Okay and I call it based on
[28:24.160 --> 28:29.560]  opinion or a guess as well so I guess I had a miscreant up on that one but another
[28:29.560 --> 28:32.400]  thing I want to ask you about probably going to get into the commercial break
[28:32.400 --> 28:37.760]  about this. Another thing Dave has talked about and maybe I'm a little confused
[28:37.760 --> 28:44.320]  about this. The extent to which it is actually legal for you to allegedly or
[28:44.320 --> 28:48.720]  not conspiring to do something if you have the right to do this. But like thought
[28:48.720 --> 28:54.000]  with some people about getting together to engage in some sort of act of
[28:54.000 --> 28:59.000]  violence against someone who is abusing their authority be it a government
[28:59.000 --> 29:07.280]  entity or or something like that and whether or not it's legal or not to do
[29:07.280 --> 29:10.200]  that if it is legal then you can be charged with conspiracy because well
[29:10.200 --> 29:14.560]  according to you for one it's within our right of our government is abusing its
[29:14.560 --> 29:18.680]  authority to overthrow it and do whatever we have to by any means
[29:18.680 --> 29:23.400]  necessary to overthrow it. Well it's not what I said that is exactly what is
[29:23.400 --> 29:28.160]  written into the Texas Bill of Rights that the people of Texas have the right
[29:28.160 --> 29:33.520]  to abolish their form of government in any manner they see fit when that
[29:33.520 --> 29:38.920]  government is no longer serving the will and purposes of the people. That's what
[29:38.920 --> 29:44.560]  the Constitution says that's not what Eddie says. Now it's no surprise that
[29:44.560 --> 29:50.480]  those that would be most adversely affected by that clause are the ones who
[29:50.480 --> 29:54.920]  attempted to create laws that make it illegal for you to enforce that clause.
[29:54.920 --> 30:00.040]  Hang on just a second and we'll finish this on the other side.
[30:00.800 --> 30:06.080]  Are you lucky? Researchers say living a charmed life is more about the choices
[30:06.080 --> 30:09.760]  you make than fate. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with four
[30:09.760 --> 30:13.600]  behaviors that increase your odds of finding a pot of gold at the end of
[30:13.600 --> 30:19.040]  your rainbow. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself you'll
[30:19.040 --> 30:23.080]  never get it back again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your
[30:23.080 --> 30:28.240]  freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[30:28.240 --> 30:33.320]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This
[30:33.320 --> 30:37.360]  public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com the private
[30:37.360 --> 30:43.920]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.920 --> 30:48.440]  According to psychologist Richard Wiseman people blessed with good fortune
[30:48.440 --> 30:52.840]  practice four behaviors that set them apart. Lucky people don't wait around for
[30:52.840 --> 30:56.520]  a windfall. They make what happen. They network and keep an eye out for
[30:56.520 --> 31:00.640]  opportunities then they act on them. Lucky people develop their intuition and
[31:00.640 --> 31:04.880]  trust their gut feelings. Lucky people expect good things to happen to them.
[31:04.880 --> 31:08.560]  They persist in working toward their goals because they believe in positive
[31:08.560 --> 31:13.600]  outcomes. These expectations become self-fulfilling prophecies and finally
[31:13.600 --> 31:18.480]  lucky people turn lemons into lemonade. They don't dwell on setbacks. Rather they
[31:18.480 --> 31:23.400]  find ways to take control and turn situations around in their favor. I'm
[31:23.400 --> 31:29.480]  Dr. Katharine Albrecht. More news and information at KatharineAlbrecht.com
[31:29.760 --> 31:35.200]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of
[31:35.200 --> 31:39.480]  September 11th. The government says that fire brought it down. However 1500
[31:39.480 --> 31:44.000]  architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 my
[31:44.000 --> 31:47.160]  fellow service members have given their lives. Thousands of my fellow
[31:47.160 --> 31:50.600]  force responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural
[31:50.600 --> 31:53.600]  engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a
[31:53.600 --> 31:57.960]  father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to
[31:57.960 --> 32:00.600]  RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:00.600 --> 32:05.720]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's
[32:05.720 --> 32:08.680]  America we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[32:08.680 --> 32:11.800]  going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our
[32:11.800 --> 32:15.120]  own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to
[32:15.120 --> 32:18.200]  place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the
[32:18.200 --> 32:21.800]  right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[32:21.800 --> 32:25.360]  opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.360 --> 32:28.840]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has
[32:28.840 --> 32:31.640]  put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help
[32:31.640 --> 32:35.080]  you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.080 --> 32:38.040]  You can get your own copy of this valuable material by going to
[32:38.040 --> 32:41.600]  RuleofLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll
[32:41.600 --> 32:45.240]  receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.240 --> 32:49.120]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents
[32:49.120 --> 32:52.200]  and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the
[32:52.200 --> 32:55.760]  help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com. Order your copy today and
[32:55.760 --> 33:12.240]  together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:25.760 --> 33:43.080]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. The calling number is 512-646-1984 if you
[33:43.080 --> 33:46.640]  want to get in line and give us a call. We are currently talking to Andrew in
[33:46.640 --> 33:50.160]  Pennsylvania. Ralph, I see you there on the board so please don't drop off and go
[33:50.160 --> 33:58.560]  away. I'll get to you as quickly as I can. Alright Andrew, go ahead. Yeah, continuing with the whole thing about what
[33:58.560 --> 34:03.760]  extent we have to resist our government's abusing of authority and they have to drop off into
[34:03.760 --> 34:08.080]  deep end here a little bit with some of these things I'm about to ask you. But okay,
[34:08.080 --> 34:12.360]  hypothetical situation, get arrested, you're about to, you're in jail, you're
[34:12.360 --> 34:17.640]  about to do all the violations of due process. Swab your DMA, script search you,
[34:17.640 --> 34:22.720]  get your fingerprints and all the rest of it. I mean is it okay, would you
[34:22.720 --> 34:26.120]  advise or dare I say to use the word advice? Like if they want to get your
[34:26.120 --> 34:28.920]  fingerprints maybe would be since you have the right to register for government
[34:28.920 --> 34:33.000]  trying to smash the fingerprinting device in the pieces to make sure. You want to
[34:33.000 --> 34:36.080]  get charged with felony destruction of government property because that
[34:36.080 --> 34:39.920]  fingerprint device happens to cost more than $1,500. That's what's going to happen.
[34:39.920 --> 34:48.800]  Well, I'm going to get charged with it, but are there laws which in theory if you try your best and it truly has to...
[34:48.800 --> 34:53.640]  Andrew, I'm going to make this really really simple. Okay. Any physical
[34:53.640 --> 34:58.400]  resistance you offer to these people as it stands right now as a sole
[34:58.400 --> 35:04.240]  individual will cost you dearly for multiple reasons, not the least of
[35:04.240 --> 35:11.080]  which is the law they wrote to say you couldn't. You do not as of yet have the
[35:11.080 --> 35:19.120]  support of the people in doing anything violent to retaliate or even to protect
[35:19.120 --> 35:24.720]  yourself except under the most extreme of circumstances. There is plenty of
[35:24.720 --> 35:28.960]  case law in the books that says they're not allowed to take fingerprints until
[35:28.960 --> 35:34.640]  certain other things have been done that are not being done, but that law does
[35:34.640 --> 35:39.760]  not say that you have the ability to kill the guy to prevent him from doing it,
[35:39.760 --> 35:44.960]  because that would be excessive force. Doesn't say you have the right to break
[35:44.960 --> 35:48.680]  his arm to prevent him from doing it, because that would be excessive force.
[35:48.680 --> 35:53.240]  It's not an appropriate response to the level of force being used against you,
[35:53.240 --> 36:02.200]  in other words. Okay? Okay. So when you ask me the question, can I or should I, my
[36:02.200 --> 36:08.120]  answer to you remains the same. Do you honestly think that you will be able to
[36:08.120 --> 36:15.120]  do it and not suffer consequences? Then it is you and you alone that can decide
[36:15.120 --> 36:44.840]  whether or not you are willing to accept those consequences. No, because what I
[36:44.840 --> 36:50.240]  wanted was for them to do it in a way that I could use it against them. Oh, okay. I
[36:50.240 --> 36:57.120]  play chess at this, not Chinese checkers. Okay? If they're going to do
[36:57.120 --> 37:01.280]  something, I am going to allow them to make the moves I need them to make and
[37:01.280 --> 37:06.640]  set the board up where they have to make those moves so that I have a lawsuit at
[37:06.640 --> 37:12.320]  the end of it. And one that they can't negate by saying that I gave them
[37:12.320 --> 37:20.040]  grounds to do such and such. Okay. That makes sense, but this is my last question.
[37:20.040 --> 37:25.400]  So in my situation where the whole thing with the traffic ticket in Arizona and
[37:25.400 --> 37:32.360]  all that, and they eventually decided to press charges against me, and I thought
[37:32.360 --> 37:36.400]  maybe, okay, since they've refunded my mother bailed me out of jail the money,
[37:36.400 --> 37:41.160]  and I assumed okay, then maybe they're not going to confiscate the case anymore.
[37:41.160 --> 37:44.960]  At that point, I would think maybe it's actually in my best interest to just
[37:44.960 --> 37:49.120]  sit on my fat butt and do nothing because if I were to actually ask questions
[37:49.120 --> 37:53.480]  about it, that would make it possible for them to come after me. So it's best to
[37:53.480 --> 37:56.640]  just not do anything in the hope that they're not going to press charges against
[37:56.640 --> 37:59.840]  me, but apparently you're saying no, no, no, you should have played chess. You
[37:59.840 --> 38:03.840]  should have tried to ask questions and maybe tried to like see what the deal
[38:03.840 --> 38:08.560]  was with that. So maybe that could eventually work out for you. Well, I'm a
[38:08.560 --> 38:14.440]  little confused. What would have been the proper motion in that regard? Again,
[38:14.440 --> 38:18.600]  without having the specific facts of your case and everything that was going on,
[38:18.600 --> 38:22.960]  including what the law on the subject is and the state in which it occurred, I
[38:22.960 --> 38:27.760]  can't answer you with anything other than a speculative guess, which I do not like
[38:27.760 --> 38:34.440]  to do. I don't get very much. Okay, when you're going to ask me a question of law,
[38:34.440 --> 38:42.800]  I want to be able to respond from fact, not from opinion or at least not my own.
[38:42.800 --> 38:49.360]  Okay, but one that matters, such as the Supreme Court, for instance, and so on and
[38:49.360 --> 38:56.760]  so forth, or at least matters in their eyes. Okay? Thank you. Alright, thanks for
[38:56.760 --> 39:01.920]  calling in. Thank you. Alright, now we're going to get to Ralph. Ralph, what do you
[39:01.920 --> 39:11.840]  got? Hello, Eddie. I wanted to share an idea, run it by you and see what you
[39:11.840 --> 39:17.400]  think of it. I was reading on the Internet articles about prosecutors and
[39:17.400 --> 39:21.000]  what they're getting by with and the question was, should prosecutors be
[39:21.000 --> 39:26.560]  immune from liability when they hide evidence? Absolutely not. Well, I know
[39:26.560 --> 39:29.960]  they shouldn't, but I'm reading these articles and they're just saying the
[39:29.960 --> 39:34.760]  prosecutors can hide and... Yeah, and that is something the courts gave them the
[39:34.760 --> 39:41.080]  power to do as attorneys and that's not the way it works. They use the excuse
[39:41.080 --> 39:46.040]  that it's the only way to ensure that a prosecutor will act without fear of
[39:46.040 --> 39:52.800]  repercussion and that's baloney. That's baloney. When you give a bank robber the
[39:52.800 --> 39:56.920]  ability to rob a freaking bank without repercussion, do you think that's going to
[39:56.920 --> 40:03.160]  make him rob fewer banks? Are you freaking kidding me?
[40:05.320 --> 40:11.960]  Well, the Innocence Project is looking at that as well. This is not the
[40:11.960 --> 40:16.640]  Innocence Project I'm looking on the screen right now, but they're
[40:16.640 --> 40:22.240]  asking the question, they're not offering solutions. So I have what... That's because
[40:22.240 --> 40:29.440]  the current system does not have any solutions. The way the system currently
[40:29.440 --> 40:35.560]  is set up and controlled, there are no solutions to be had because the only way
[40:35.560 --> 40:41.080]  that a solution could be found was to take the attorneys out of the judiciary
[40:41.080 --> 40:47.520]  and that's not going to happen as long as the law is written by attorneys to give
[40:47.520 --> 40:52.360]  them monopolies on the higher offices in every department of government and
[40:52.360 --> 41:00.440]  exclusively two attorneys in the judiciary. There is not one single office of
[41:00.440 --> 41:04.320]  authority in the judicial department of government that can be occupied by a
[41:04.320 --> 41:14.800]  non-attorney, not a single one. They control the law from the bench unlawfully,
[41:14.800 --> 41:20.320]  unconstitutionally, and to serve their own personal agendas. Why do you think
[41:20.320 --> 41:27.360]  there are so many progressive judges running for office? Because they can
[41:27.360 --> 41:32.960]  rewrite the Constitution and all the state laws with their opinions without
[41:32.960 --> 41:39.560]  fear of consequence. Because they control the bar, they control the judicial aspects
[41:39.560 --> 41:48.000]  of government, they control the executive, they control the legislative. And what
[41:48.000 --> 41:55.080]  they're getting in return is a class of nonviolent citizens that want to know
[41:55.080 --> 42:00.280]  what happened so they turn to the law, they read the law, and they say, wait a
[42:00.280 --> 42:06.960]  minute, you guys are doing nothing but violating the law. Exactly. So I stood on
[42:06.960 --> 42:12.880]  my grounds to protect my rights. And what happened to me? Well, I got a
[42:12.880 --> 42:17.400]  AR-15 pointed at me for a minute which was insignificant according to the
[42:17.400 --> 42:21.440]  courts because it was only for a minute and then I got my call window busted and
[42:21.440 --> 42:27.960]  went to jail for standing on my rights. So I'm not doing anything to retaliate but
[42:27.960 --> 42:33.240]  yet I'm and you and people like us are their biggest fear because we're trying
[42:33.240 --> 42:37.400]  to share knowledge. Right. And we're trying to make the people stand up for
[42:37.400 --> 42:45.280]  themselves. See, if a jury refused, absolutely refused, to uphold or even do
[42:45.280 --> 42:51.480]  a conviction for somebody accused of these so-called offenses, they couldn't
[42:51.480 --> 42:55.680]  make money at it. They would have to stop doing it because they couldn't afford
[42:55.680 --> 43:00.840]  to keep doing something that's losing money instead of making money. Okay. Not
[43:00.840 --> 43:05.480]  to mention when a jury decides always in the favor of the individual against the
[43:05.480 --> 43:09.000]  government, which is something else that will begin to happen on a regular basis.
[43:09.000 --> 43:13.480]  Every lawsuit filed against a government official that managed to make it into a
[43:13.480 --> 43:17.480]  courtroom, the government would almost certainly lose it right then and there.
[43:17.480 --> 43:24.080]  And they would have to pay enormous rewards that the jury would have set
[43:24.080 --> 43:29.280]  on, which means the court would have to be constantly resetting the amounts
[43:29.280 --> 43:33.560]  awarded by the jury, which then would get that judge removed from office
[43:33.560 --> 43:40.240]  eventually because he won't let the jury's opinion stand. Okay. Hang on just a
[43:40.240 --> 43:44.160]  second and we'll finish this up on the other side, Ralph. All right, folks. Call
[43:44.160 --> 43:50.280]  the number is 512-646-1984. Give us a call. Get in line. Let's talk. We'll be
[43:50.280 --> 44:04.600]  right back. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case
[44:04.600 --> 44:10.120]  without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4CV
[44:10.120 --> 44:16.880]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know
[44:16.880 --> 44:21.200]  what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should
[44:21.200 --> 44:26.800]  do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can
[44:26.800 --> 44:32.120]  too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[44:32.120 --> 44:36.960]  case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what
[44:36.960 --> 44:41.600]  everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our
[44:41.600 --> 44:47.120]  American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[44:47.120 --> 44:54.080]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[44:54.080 --> 45:01.880]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[45:02.800 --> 45:08.040]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like
[45:08.040 --> 45:12.640]  to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D, here in
[45:12.640 --> 45:16.520]  Austin, Texas, find brave new books and chase things to see all our fantastic
[45:16.520 --> 45:20.160]  health and wellness products with your very own eyes. Have a look at our
[45:20.160 --> 45:23.920]  miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a
[45:23.920 --> 45:27.000]  peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian
[45:27.000 --> 45:31.640]  emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call
[45:31.640 --> 45:41.800]  512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043
[45:41.800 --> 45:45.920]  naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook for
[45:45.920 --> 46:02.440]  information on events and our products naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.920 --> 46:43.360]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We are currently talking to Ralph
[46:43.360 --> 46:48.960]  in Texas. Alright, Ralph, please continue. Okay, that sounds like a good
[46:48.960 --> 46:54.160]  pass to me. I think that sounds like my fully informed jury association material
[46:54.160 --> 46:58.600]  and yes. Yeah, I absolutely agree. Fully informed jury is the way that this is
[46:58.600 --> 47:05.160]  going to have to begin. It really is. We start depriving them of money. The only
[47:05.160 --> 47:10.440]  way to deprive them of money is to make them lose the case. The way to make them
[47:10.440 --> 47:15.720]  lose the case is to educate the jury to the point of not convicting. If they
[47:15.720 --> 47:24.840]  can't generate money from it, they won't do it. Yes, and if they follow the law,
[47:24.840 --> 47:29.400]  they won't be able to do it because I'll be sure. Well, but that's the thing. Once
[47:29.400 --> 47:33.240]  the jury is shown to be more knowledgeable and willing to comply with
[47:33.240 --> 47:37.880]  the law than the judge or the prosecutor, they're going to make that known. When a
[47:37.880 --> 47:42.280]  jury comes back from the deliberation and says, we hereby find that the court in
[47:42.280 --> 47:46.800]  the prosecution has attempted to intentionally deceive the jury
[47:46.800 --> 47:51.560]  members after the proper application and course of the law. We hereby find the
[47:51.560 --> 47:56.720]  defendant not guilty for prosecutorial misconduct and fraud and that it was
[47:56.720 --> 48:04.760]  furthered by the court. Okay, once a jury puts something like that into a record,
[48:04.760 --> 48:17.040]  these guys are going to start running for the heels. Yeah. So that's really what
[48:17.040 --> 48:22.280]  it's going to come down to if we're going to do it without violence. But if I'm
[48:22.280 --> 48:27.440]  being completely honest, I don't see how that is ever going to be the case. I
[48:27.440 --> 48:37.800]  really don't. In your material, the traffic stop transcript, you say give
[48:37.800 --> 48:44.720]  the officer notice that you're not in commerce. Now, if that goes to... I say
[48:44.720 --> 48:50.480]  tell, just simply state, I am not engaged in any form of transportation or other
[48:50.480 --> 48:55.680]  commercial use of the highways. Yes, sir. I stand corrected. Okay, yes, that is
[48:55.680 --> 48:59.600]  what you said, but that is a notice, so you don't have to say it's a notice. That's
[48:59.600 --> 49:03.920]  right, but that notice is not said for the officer's benefit, it's said for the
[49:03.920 --> 49:09.480]  video's benefit. Correct, I understand, but what my question is this, if you're
[49:09.480 --> 49:13.600]  given notice to an officer, how can they come back and say any reasonable
[49:13.600 --> 49:17.960]  officer would have, and would that be something like a case of first
[49:17.960 --> 49:22.760]  impression if you gave notice to the officer? In other words, you... It will
[49:22.760 --> 49:27.240]  never be a case of first impression until we get the court to address the
[49:27.240 --> 49:32.840]  specific issue being raised, which is their fraud and not requiring that the
[49:32.840 --> 49:37.720]  state allege and prove that transportation actually was being engaged in at
[49:37.720 --> 49:42.880]  the time of the alleged offense. See, the offense cannot exist outside of the
[49:42.880 --> 49:49.400]  subject matter context under which it was created by the legislature, yet no
[49:49.400 --> 49:55.400]  criminal complaint in a transportation case has ever alleged that the accused
[49:55.400 --> 50:00.480]  individual was engaging in an act of transportation when the offense occurred,
[50:00.480 --> 50:06.720]  and yet it's impossible to have the one and not the other and be
[50:06.720 --> 50:13.560]  constitutionally compliant with the way the statute operates. Right, okay, I've
[50:13.560 --> 50:20.600]  got that. Okay, well, one of the things I wanted to run by you was this thing
[50:20.600 --> 50:25.760]  about should prosecutors be able to fabricate evidence and put people in
[50:25.760 --> 50:29.080]  prison for life. Sounds to me like murder, you know? I'm gonna put somebody on
[50:29.080 --> 50:35.520]  death row. So anyway, I was thinking about... I'm not in a criminal case right now,
[50:35.520 --> 50:39.880]  but if I become anyone, I'm gonna work on this some more. I can just start typing
[50:39.880 --> 50:45.560]  it today. What it is is the sworn statement that you, you know, the defendant
[50:45.560 --> 50:51.880]  would create and give to the prosecutor which says that he is not, you know,
[50:51.880 --> 50:56.840]  this is the prosecutor's day, and I'm not hiding evidence, I'm not infilling
[50:56.840 --> 51:01.600]  evidence, I'm not fabricating evidence. It's a brainy motion. I know that, I know
[51:01.600 --> 51:06.480]  that. Okay. They're letting them do this, so if we do this with the sworn statement
[51:06.480 --> 51:12.800]  that he notarizes saying that if it is found that I have done that, I voluntarily
[51:12.800 --> 51:20.920]  withdraw any immunity from the app. Okay, now that's just, that's just off top of my
[51:20.920 --> 51:26.240]  head. Right, but like I said, we didn't give them immunity. The law does not give
[51:26.240 --> 51:31.200]  them immunity. The Constitution does not give them immunity. They have fabricated
[51:31.200 --> 51:38.440]  immunity themselves. The attorneys in the courts have created immunity where no
[51:38.440 --> 51:44.480]  such immunity was ever reasoned to apply. The founding fathers would have to have
[51:44.480 --> 51:51.440]  been monumental morons to create a form of government and a branch of government
[51:51.440 --> 51:58.400]  that could order itself immune from any repercussion of violating every
[51:58.400 --> 52:05.000]  provision in law that's ever written. And they didn't. It's like, but the courts
[52:05.000 --> 52:11.360]  did. It's like a picture of the wait list. I saw that late when I went looking
[52:11.360 --> 52:16.400]  for you because you weren't on the show live last week. Yeah. And I got, I got it
[52:16.400 --> 52:21.600]  pretty quick, I think, you know, I mean, I've said similar things, but it's like
[52:21.600 --> 52:25.200]  that picture of this idiotic wait list they're holding a child while he's
[52:25.200 --> 52:31.200]  at the great is the same thing as what the masses are doing by allowing these
[52:31.200 --> 52:35.640]  courts to do this and doing nothing. So what do they say? Well, that gives us
[52:35.640 --> 52:39.600]  profession to do more. These people are so stupid. Exactly. But that's, that's
[52:39.600 --> 52:43.640]  exactly what the lack of actual education about the law and what the courts
[52:43.640 --> 52:48.240]  are doing is helping out the courts and not us. That's what we have to fix.
[52:48.240 --> 52:52.720]  That's what we have to change. The problem I'm hearing from most people is
[52:52.720 --> 52:57.640]  most people are upset by the fact that nobody listens to them. Well, I agree.
[52:57.640 --> 53:01.880]  Nobody likes to listen. Nobody likes to be told that they're doing it wrong or
[53:01.880 --> 53:05.560]  they're thinking about it wrong or they don't understand something. People hate
[53:05.560 --> 53:10.200]  that because they've got it in their mind that they are somehow so special
[53:10.200 --> 53:15.160]  that it is utterly impossible for them to be incorrect. And this is when they
[53:15.160 --> 53:21.160]  have done absolutely nothing to earn the knowledge they've got. So imagine how
[53:21.160 --> 53:26.000]  they get when they have thought they earned the knowledge they have, but it
[53:26.000 --> 53:29.880]  turns out that they were intentionally misdirected and misled about that
[53:29.880 --> 53:34.800]  knowledge and how it actually has to work. That's an even worse case scenario
[53:34.800 --> 53:39.280]  in having to get their attention redirected. But that's exactly the
[53:39.280 --> 53:44.760]  problem we have with an attorney. I am extremely hard to convince that my point
[53:44.760 --> 53:52.600]  is incorrect, but I can stand upon my point by citing something substantial
[53:52.600 --> 53:58.800]  as to why I have it in the first place. These guys can't even do that. And yet
[53:58.800 --> 54:03.240]  the stuff they throw out there, they're throwing it out there like it's somehow a
[54:03.240 --> 54:08.680]  concrete mountain base that or granite mountain base that they can just stand on
[54:08.680 --> 54:14.480]  immovable when in fact it does nothing of the sort. They throw that big-ass
[54:14.480 --> 54:18.960]  rock in a big-ass and even bigger ass and deeper pool of quicksand and they
[54:18.960 --> 54:26.480]  don't even realize it. That's how brainwashed they have become. And if you
[54:26.480 --> 54:30.640]  think the so-called intelligent people that are attorneys are so easily
[54:30.640 --> 54:38.080]  misled, imagine about the public educated masses. You may as well be trying to
[54:38.080 --> 54:46.760]  teach your dog to recite the Bible. Are you familiar with Dunning-Kruger effect?
[54:46.760 --> 54:56.160]  The what? Dunning-Kruger effect. Don't recall having heard the phrase
[54:56.160 --> 55:03.240]  before. Okay well it might be fun to look up when we get a chance. It's pretty
[55:03.240 --> 55:07.880]  short but I didn't really want to get into it. But it's similar to what you
[55:07.880 --> 55:12.680]  talking about what people believe and think. And there's another quote I'm
[55:12.680 --> 55:16.760]  thinking of right now. The marks of an intelligent man is one who can entertain
[55:16.760 --> 55:23.720]  an idea without accepting it. Of course they're actually
[55:23.720 --> 55:28.320]  tyrants so it's not that they're not intelligent. They can't
[55:28.320 --> 55:33.280]  entertain the idea. They don't want to. These people are not. These people are
[55:33.280 --> 55:37.280]  extremely smart. They're very evil but extremely smart.
[55:37.280 --> 55:44.040]  So what I was thinking about with your sworn statement, putting on legal
[55:44.040 --> 55:51.000]  paper, make it all nice and fancy like an oath of office and have it spell out
[55:51.000 --> 55:55.840]  you know that I will not hide the story of fabricated evidence and that I would
[55:55.840 --> 56:01.080]  force it my immunity if it's found that myself or anyone in my office did do
[56:01.080 --> 56:06.320]  such a thing and I explained you know that there's you know write all in this
[56:06.320 --> 56:10.920]  for him to find that he understands that he works for the people you know some
[56:10.920 --> 56:15.560]  pretty stuff not a whole lot. Yeah there's only two problems that I find with
[56:15.560 --> 56:23.000]  that. One, they will go ahead. Okay, file it into the criminal case,
[56:23.000 --> 56:30.160]  send it to the prosecutor and then if he doesn't find it, make copies with big red
[56:30.160 --> 56:34.960]  ink on it. Prosecutor refused to sign this and embarrassing. Get the newspaper,
[56:34.960 --> 56:40.400]  give it to people in the courthouse, put it on windshield, you know, share it as
[56:40.400 --> 56:45.480]  much as possible. It is this adult, okay? Yeah and I was hoping to get your feedback on it.
[56:45.480 --> 56:48.800]  Well I mean you can try it. I don't see what good it's going to actually
[56:48.800 --> 56:52.600]  accomplish but I mean I've done the same thing in cases where I simply file a
[56:52.600 --> 56:57.760]  motion moving the court to provide a fair and impartial trial which they would
[56:57.760 --> 57:03.840]  immediately deny out of hand because they wouldn't read the motion and they
[57:03.840 --> 57:09.160]  would deny a motion for a fair and impartial trial. Because it didn't bother
[57:09.160 --> 57:15.520]  to read it. Exactly. Now what does that mean? It means this judge just disqualified
[57:15.520 --> 57:19.920]  themselves from your case by saying I am going to deny your request for a fair
[57:19.920 --> 57:26.280]  and impartial trial. Yeah well I can see that would be considerably better than
[57:26.280 --> 57:30.360]  what I'm talking about right here. Yeah all you got to do is file that as a one
[57:30.360 --> 57:33.800]  or two page motion in your case. I hereby move the court to provide the
[57:33.800 --> 57:39.000]  accused in this case or in this matter with a fair and impartial proceeding
[57:39.000 --> 57:42.520]  consistent with the Constitution and laws of the state of Texas and the
[57:42.520 --> 57:45.760]  federal and the Constitution of the United States of America and I guarantee
[57:45.760 --> 57:52.520]  you they'll deny it out of hand. Okay. Well the sworn statement I may play
[57:52.520 --> 57:58.400]  around with it some more. It's intended to embarrass and show other people that
[57:58.400 --> 58:04.000]  are not yet interested that these prosecutors are able to do these things.
[58:04.000 --> 58:07.760]  They know they're able to do these things and they want to do the things. They're
[58:07.760 --> 58:10.440]  not going to give it up. They're not going to give up hiding evidence. They're not
[58:10.440 --> 58:13.400]  going to give up trying to promote themselves to higher politics and
[58:13.400 --> 58:17.920]  convictions. They're just not going to give it up. So it's just a little something
[58:17.920 --> 58:26.240]  for them. But I say what you do in your own case is up to you as long as you can
[58:26.240 --> 58:30.840]  do it in a way that won't wind you up in jail. But the simple fact of the matter
[58:30.840 --> 58:35.840]  is is they're not going to do anything until they are forced to do it and I
[58:35.840 --> 58:39.000]  don't necessarily mean when a gun barrel stuck up their nose but it's going to
[58:39.000 --> 58:43.040]  take more than just an individual to accomplish it. All right guys y'all hang
[58:43.040 --> 58:48.640]  on just a second. I got a break and we'll finish all this up on the other side.
[58:49.360 --> 58:55.120]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world yet countless readers are
[58:55.120 --> 58:59.720]  frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try
[58:59.720 --> 59:04.840]  to help by simplifying the text but in the process can compromise the profound
[59:04.840 --> 59:10.000]  meaning of the Scripture. Enter the recovery version. First this new
[59:10.000 --> 59:14.920]  translation is extremely faithful and accurate but the real story is the more
[59:14.920 --> 59:20.200]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are
[59:20.200 --> 59:25.000]  opened up in a marvelous way providing an entrance into the riches of the word
[59:25.000 --> 59:29.720]  beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to
[59:29.720 --> 59:34.480]  give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet
[59:34.480 --> 59:43.160]  compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.160 --> 59:50.280]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.280 --> 59:58.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. Logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:01.880 --> 01:00:07.560]  The following news flash is brought to you by the low start of lowdown. Providing
[01:00:07.560 --> 01:00:13.760]  the deli bulletins for the commodity market. Today in history news updates and
[01:00:13.760 --> 01:00:22.960]  the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:22.960 --> 01:00:28.880]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 closed with gold $1,353.22
[01:00:28.880 --> 01:00:34.480]  in ounce. Silver $16.68 in ounce. Texas crude $65.51 a barrel.
[01:00:34.480 --> 01:00:44.160]  Bitcoins at $6,902.19. Ethereums at $420.80. Bitcoin cash is at $652.90 and
[01:00:44.160 --> 01:00:50.520]  finally light coins at $114.34 a crypto coin.
[01:00:54.720 --> 01:01:01.080]  Today in history the year 1968 President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights
[01:01:01.080 --> 01:01:05.280]  Act of 1968 which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based
[01:01:05.280 --> 01:01:09.840]  on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It also prohibited unequal
[01:01:09.840 --> 01:01:13.480]  application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in
[01:01:13.480 --> 01:01:17.840]  public schools and employment and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:01:17.840 --> 01:01:26.680]  Today in history. In recent news tensions in Syria seem to have reached new
[01:01:26.680 --> 01:01:30.080]  levels after a chemical attack on civilians in the city of Douma which
[01:01:30.080 --> 01:01:33.280]  left 40 dead and many injured. An attack which is being blamed on the
[01:01:33.280 --> 01:01:37.160]  democratically elected president of Syria Bashar al-Assad by the United
[01:01:37.160 --> 01:01:41.040]  States and on Israel by Russia. Either accusatory narrative without any
[01:01:41.040 --> 01:01:45.200]  verified evidence as of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if
[01:01:45.200 --> 01:01:49.640]  quote Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria get ready
[01:01:49.640 --> 01:01:53.520]  Russia because they will be coming in nice and new and smart. Going on to warn
[01:01:53.520 --> 01:01:57.120]  Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who kills his
[01:01:57.120 --> 01:02:00.800]  people and enjoys it. Many in the West including President Trump have been
[01:02:00.800 --> 01:02:05.200]  quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted by Assad
[01:02:05.200 --> 01:02:09.800]  and his forces. Syria and Russia on the other hand have given approval since
[01:02:09.800 --> 01:02:13.200]  yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to
[01:02:13.200 --> 01:02:16.920]  investigate the side of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in
[01:02:16.920 --> 01:02:20.880]  maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil war. A civil war
[01:02:20.880 --> 01:02:24.560]  that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian rebels
[01:02:24.560 --> 01:02:28.840]  that are openly being funded by Western governments with ISIS being one of the
[01:02:28.840 --> 01:02:32.720]  more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels. No
[01:02:32.720 --> 01:02:37.360]  surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted
[01:02:37.360 --> 01:02:41.120]  on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a
[01:02:41.120 --> 01:02:45.200]  legitimate government which has been fighting terrorists or is this a trick
[01:02:45.200 --> 01:02:48.720]  to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike and then there will be no
[01:02:48.720 --> 01:02:52.800]  evidence for international inspectors to look at.
[01:02:52.800 --> 01:02:59.120]  This was Kirk Rody with your lowdown for April 11th, 2018.
[01:03:22.800 --> 01:03:51.840]  Alright folks we are back this is rule of law radio the call at number 512
[01:03:51.840 --> 01:03:59.080]  646 1984 and we are going to wrap this up with Ralph. Alright Ralph. Well that's
[01:03:59.080 --> 01:04:04.280]  really all I had but I would like to emphasize what you were saying earlier
[01:04:04.280 --> 01:04:09.760]  about the fun drive. Anybody that shops around will find at least that's what I
[01:04:09.760 --> 01:04:14.800]  found is there's nothing else quite like logos and real law radio. It's real
[01:04:14.800 --> 01:04:20.320]  simple the homepage gives you a listen button right there and you guys know
[01:04:20.320 --> 01:04:26.160]  criminal you and Randy no criminals coming and going so we're just people
[01:04:26.160 --> 01:04:29.280]  that call in and listen regularly are going to step up and donate a little bit
[01:04:29.280 --> 01:04:33.680]  more I don't donate and I plan on donating some it's the middle of the
[01:04:33.680 --> 01:04:39.880]  year but I may donate a little bit early so you guys are unique and I for
[01:04:39.880 --> 01:04:44.320]  one really appreciate it you've been Randy as well that's helped me quite a
[01:04:44.320 --> 01:04:48.760]  bit and I don't have any criminal faces right now and that's because of you
[01:04:48.760 --> 01:04:54.280]  daddy appreciate it yes sir well glad to be of help that's why we're here yes
[01:04:54.280 --> 01:05:00.080]  sir okay well you have a good evening you too thanks for calling in Ralph bye
[01:05:00.080 --> 01:05:06.280]  alright now we have Sam in North Dakota Sam what can we do for you can you hear
[01:05:06.280 --> 01:05:12.760]  me I can okay I just had a guess start out with a comment on the seminary seminar
[01:05:12.760 --> 01:05:17.760]  material I purchased from you okay years ago I gotta give you a lot of credit
[01:05:17.760 --> 01:05:23.760]  for dismiss on that use converted it to North Dakota as much as they could well
[01:05:23.760 --> 01:05:29.280]  how successful were you I got a dismiss it went up the court date and they
[01:05:29.280 --> 01:05:33.920]  dismissed it on some they didn't the prosecutor did not follow the discovery
[01:05:33.920 --> 01:05:41.160]  request that I'd put in and the judge was forced to dismiss it yeah so another
[01:05:41.160 --> 01:05:45.080]  quest I had a question and that's why another comment I just there's thousands
[01:05:45.080 --> 01:05:49.040]  of dollars worth of information in there for people out there looking to find to
[01:05:49.040 --> 01:05:53.680]  learn different you know different resources and all kind of things you
[01:05:53.680 --> 01:05:57.920]  you can't do it in a week to get all what's in there it's just it's way worth
[01:05:57.920 --> 01:06:02.240]  well if you could do it in a week I'd love to see somebody able to do it I
[01:06:02.240 --> 01:06:07.680]  don't think mr. data could do it in a week yeah I just thought there's a 96
[01:06:07.680 --> 01:06:13.960]  gigabytes of information in there that has to be digested over time some of it
[01:06:13.960 --> 01:06:17.680]  is stuff you don't ever want to use and ever want to do but you need to
[01:06:17.680 --> 01:06:21.840]  understand why and in there's the stuff that's actually useful and helpful and
[01:06:21.840 --> 01:06:27.680]  is cross-referenced by other material and how to put it into effect so yeah
[01:06:27.680 --> 01:06:34.480]  there's a lot of information in there and believe me $250 is not anywhere near
[01:06:34.480 --> 01:06:40.840]  what it's worth not at all though it's well I mean it's just it's just a steal
[01:06:40.840 --> 01:06:46.040]  it will really well I'm a question I have what is the best way when you go to
[01:06:46.040 --> 01:06:52.360]  court first appearance you know that maybe they want a fortune at a plead you
[01:06:52.360 --> 01:06:56.520]  know then that if you don't say anything is you know a plead for your then you
[01:06:56.520 --> 01:07:00.920]  follow written objection to withdraw the plea no probable cause the termination
[01:07:00.920 --> 01:07:06.200]  was found no jurisdiction subject matter or personal jurisdiction was
[01:07:06.200 --> 01:07:10.520]  established by evidence introduced to the record blah blah blah the court is
[01:07:10.520 --> 01:07:13.800]  acting without lawful authority when it enters a plea on behalf of someone it
[01:07:13.800 --> 01:07:19.200]  has no jurisdiction over and an offense it has no jurisdiction over so the thing
[01:07:19.200 --> 01:07:23.560]  about it is is once jurisdiction is challenged whether it be personal or
[01:07:23.560 --> 01:07:29.240]  subject matter but especially subject matter the court has to have something
[01:07:29.240 --> 01:07:33.600]  admitted into the record by the one making the allegation in the first place
[01:07:33.600 --> 01:07:39.840]  that shows how and why that court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and
[01:07:39.840 --> 01:07:46.040]  how and why that court via that subject matter has jurisdiction over the one
[01:07:46.040 --> 01:07:52.400]  being accused of violating that subject matter if they can't get that and
[01:07:52.400 --> 01:07:57.160]  establish it on the record there is no evidence of jurisdiction that exists
[01:07:57.160 --> 01:08:04.240]  other than the simple presumption of it and they can't act lawfully on just the
[01:08:04.240 --> 01:08:09.400]  presumption of jurisdiction then there comes the issue of a proper allegation
[01:08:09.400 --> 01:08:14.560]  like I was saying at the beginning of the show a malum prohibitum statute is
[01:08:14.560 --> 01:08:19.720]  regulated by a specific subject matter it has to be according to every state
[01:08:19.720 --> 01:08:24.280]  constitution I've read there is a single subject requirement for every single
[01:08:24.280 --> 01:08:27.920]  piece of legislation enacted doesn't matter whether it's enacted as an
[01:08:27.920 --> 01:08:34.320]  individual statute 10 statutes or an entire code of statutes it has a single
[01:08:34.320 --> 01:08:39.880]  subject that everything in that piece of legislation must adhere to when they
[01:08:39.880 --> 01:08:46.600]  fail to allege that subject matter they fail to establish the primary element of
[01:08:46.600 --> 01:08:53.760]  the offense and if it doesn't exist neither does the offense if the offense
[01:08:53.760 --> 01:08:59.160]  does not exist because the subject matter does not exist then the subject matter
[01:08:59.160 --> 01:09:07.400]  jurisdiction does not exist hence personal jurisdiction does not exist see
[01:09:07.400 --> 01:09:13.840]  how it's all glued together mm-hmm yeah so even if they do plead for you I mean
[01:09:13.840 --> 01:09:17.120]  I always thought of you know bringing in that honor because I can't expecting me
[01:09:17.120 --> 01:09:20.840]  to make an unconscionable plea well that's what you need to ask them on the
[01:09:20.840 --> 01:09:26.920]  record objection is the court attempting to badger the witness into giving an
[01:09:26.920 --> 01:09:32.560]  unconscionable plea because I can't give an unconscionable plea well the other
[01:09:32.560 --> 01:09:36.280]  question is is how they filed the proper charging instrument to invest the court
[01:09:36.280 --> 01:09:39.760]  with jurisdiction to begin with because the charging instrument has to make
[01:09:39.760 --> 01:09:43.600]  specific allegations of the offense including all the elements required to
[01:09:43.600 --> 01:09:48.520]  be proven in this case of a malin prohibitive statute the primary element
[01:09:48.520 --> 01:09:53.560]  is the subject matter to which the offense applies they cannot separate the
[01:09:53.560 --> 01:09:59.880]  two yet they do it every single time they enter a complaint they fail to state
[01:09:59.880 --> 01:10:06.760]  the subject matter to which the offense relates and they have yet to prove that
[01:10:06.760 --> 01:10:12.400]  the individual had a legal nexus with the subject matter in order for the
[01:10:12.400 --> 01:10:17.760]  offense to be applicable that's fraud in the in the subject matter is
[01:10:17.760 --> 01:10:22.480]  transportation they want to bring that up here it is yes and others it's a
[01:10:22.480 --> 01:10:29.200]  motor vehicle code what invest I could find an orthopedic constitution the
[01:10:29.200 --> 01:10:32.960]  city of cities like they have the ordinances they call them criminal
[01:10:32.960 --> 01:10:36.880]  they've kind of mirror this yeah but if your state constitution doesn't allow
[01:10:36.880 --> 01:10:41.200]  cities to create law does it no there's not no language there authorizes
[01:10:41.200 --> 01:10:45.680]  anybody but the legislature exactly and then you will find tons of case law that
[01:10:45.680 --> 01:10:51.320]  says the legislature cannot delegate that authority this is where the courts
[01:10:51.320 --> 01:10:57.240]  have once again perpetrated fraud by and rewritten the constitution to
[01:10:57.240 --> 01:11:02.360]  authorize political subdivisions to create policies and procedures that are
[01:11:02.360 --> 01:11:09.360]  only legally binding on their own employees and agents and offices and
[01:11:09.360 --> 01:11:14.880]  not the general public and then to act upon it as if it is indeed public law
[01:11:14.880 --> 01:11:20.000]  they have done this by creating unconstitutional statutes within your
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:27.600]  codes that define the term law look it up go do a search on your online version
[01:11:27.600 --> 01:11:35.320]  of statutes and look for two things in double quotes put law means and after
[01:11:35.320 --> 01:11:40.560]  you get your hits off of that put in law includes and get your hits off of that
[01:11:40.560 --> 01:11:46.280]  then you go look up each of those specific hits I guarantee you what you're
[01:11:46.280 --> 01:11:52.280]  going to find is a definition of the term law that says law means and then it's
[01:11:52.280 --> 01:11:58.920]  going to include things like policies procedures regulations and ordinances so
[01:11:58.920 --> 01:12:04.440]  when they say that you violated the law in such a case you must challenge
[01:12:04.440 --> 01:12:09.640]  whether or not that is an a law that is compliant with our state constitution
[01:12:09.640 --> 01:12:15.000]  pursuant articles such and such where that law was initiated by one of the
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:19.320]  houses of the legislature enacted by the legislature and signed into law by the
[01:12:19.320 --> 01:12:23.280]  governor or are you talking about a statutory definition of law that
[01:12:23.280 --> 01:12:29.920]  violates those particular provisions by allowing a political subdivision to act
[01:12:29.920 --> 01:12:34.880]  as if it's internal policy is public law are you charging me with an actual law
[01:12:34.880 --> 01:12:42.760]  are you charging me with a definition of law that's unconstitutional the city
[01:12:42.760 --> 01:12:49.120]  ordinance is always near the state one but still doesn't matter it doesn't matter
[01:12:49.120 --> 01:12:56.040]  if it mirrors it or not the courts are attempting to allow a municipality to
[01:12:56.040 --> 01:13:02.360]  write a law as if it has authority to do so why do you need an ordinance to
[01:13:02.360 --> 01:13:07.880]  implement a state law in the state in which it applies what is the purpose of
[01:13:07.880 --> 01:13:14.280]  that the only purpose it serves is to allow the public perception that the
[01:13:14.280 --> 01:13:22.240]  municipality itself can write a law that's all it does it is fraud it is
[01:13:22.240 --> 01:13:33.720]  unconstitutional another question I have I scaled this in the material
[01:13:33.720 --> 01:13:39.640]  somebody maybe out of Washington or Oregon talking about the right to
[01:13:39.640 --> 01:13:43.800]  vehicular travel and I see that in you on the definition of highway and street
[01:13:43.800 --> 01:13:49.360]  they say as a matter of right public has you know for vehicular travel right but
[01:13:49.360 --> 01:13:55.200]  if that vehicular word is that a bad word to be using or it depends upon the
[01:13:55.200 --> 01:14:01.560]  context of how the term is used vehicular is not a defined term within
[01:14:01.560 --> 01:14:10.280]  the code vehicle is okay but vehicle also has a common meaning outside of
[01:14:10.280 --> 01:14:16.920]  statute whereas transportation's common meaning is what the statutes apply to
[01:14:16.920 --> 01:14:23.560]  which is commerce the difference there is the common slang term of vehicle
[01:14:23.560 --> 01:14:31.880]  okay we use it as a reference to our our cars in common parlance but under law
[01:14:31.880 --> 01:14:37.000]  it's defined as a motor vehicle relevant to the specific activity of
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:43.200]  transportation the specific subject matter of the legislation that's where
[01:14:43.200 --> 01:14:50.000]  the distinctive difference in the meanings comes from yeah I know in
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:54.280]  North Dakota the regional enactments it goes you know the meanings that they
[01:14:54.280 --> 01:14:58.400]  took that matter right word out of the HR part now they did that in a lot of
[01:14:58.400 --> 01:15:02.160]  statutes here in Texas it used to say that in a lot of statues now there's
[01:15:02.160 --> 01:15:06.920]  only one the Parks and Recreation Code is the only one that still contains
[01:15:06.920 --> 01:15:12.200]  languages says the public has access to or has the right to use the highways or
[01:15:12.200 --> 01:15:17.480]  I'm sorry has the ability to use the highways as a matter of right that's the
[01:15:17.480 --> 01:15:22.520]  only place in all of Texas law for that specific terminology still exists it
[01:15:22.520 --> 01:15:27.680]  used to exist in multiple codes now it's been obliterated and the reason it's
[01:15:27.680 --> 01:15:33.200]  been obliterated is to hide the truth because by removing those specific
[01:15:33.200 --> 01:15:40.320]  citations and rewarding them to hide the commercial aspect and the right aspect
[01:15:40.320 --> 01:15:45.080]  they are attempting to alter the subject matter of the code through
[01:15:45.080 --> 01:15:50.800]  inference they are hiding its true nature by removing terminology that
[01:15:50.800 --> 01:15:56.480]  clearly spells out it's true nature to give it the appearance of applying
[01:15:56.480 --> 01:16:03.640]  beyond that true nature but like you say if you go back to the original thing
[01:16:03.640 --> 01:16:09.120]  that the law is based on two definitions original and active in 1927 I think it
[01:16:09.120 --> 01:16:12.720]  was yeah it's all right there it says very clearly it's commercial it's all
[01:16:12.720 --> 01:16:16.800]  all over in there but the vehicle right to travel still we mentioned to have yeah
[01:16:16.800 --> 01:16:20.360]  it's all over in there about this is means commercial this is used for
[01:16:20.360 --> 01:16:28.800]  commercial this is where commercial applies yeah yeah I know believe me the
[01:16:28.800 --> 01:16:31.560]  license plates in the Parks and Recreation Code came under a different thing they
[01:16:31.560 --> 01:16:35.520]  come under the automobile anti theft act or something yeah same thing here in
[01:16:35.520 --> 01:16:40.240]  Texas the registration of automobiles was specifically done for the purpose of
[01:16:40.240 --> 01:16:45.640]  preventing theft of motor vehicles however motor vehicle in Texas under the
[01:16:45.640 --> 01:16:49.600]  registration act used to specifically state that it only applied to state-owned
[01:16:49.600 --> 01:16:54.560]  vehicles imagine that they remove that statute as well hey I'll just say it
[01:16:54.560 --> 01:16:57.640]  we'll be right back after the break
[01:17:02.920 --> 01:17:09.600]  it's the 2018 logos radio network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by
[01:17:09.600 --> 01:17:15.560]  central texas gunworks go to logos radio network.com and enter to win every
[01:17:15.560 --> 01:17:20.680]  twenty five dollar donation is a chance to win from central texas gunworks the
[01:17:20.680 --> 01:17:26.920]  grand prize up for grabs is a spikes tactical AR 15 more prizes and sponsors
[01:17:26.920 --> 01:17:32.720]  to be announced when you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book legal 101 you get four
[01:17:32.720 --> 01:17:37.600]  chances to win purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get ten chances to
[01:17:37.600 --> 01:17:43.000]  win and remember every twenty five dollar donation is a chance to win if
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:47.600]  you've enjoyed the shows on logos radio network support our fundraiser so we can
[01:17:47.600 --> 01:17:52.120]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today we
[01:17:52.120 --> 01:17:56.200]  also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies go to logos radio
[01:17:56.200 --> 01:18:02.480]  network.com for details and donate today I love logos without the shows on this
[01:18:02.480 --> 01:18:06.400]  network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends I'm so addicted to the truth now
[01:18:06.400 --> 01:18:11.080]  that there's no going back I need my truth fit I'd be lost without logos and I
[01:18:11.080 --> 01:18:14.880]  really want to help keep this network on the air I'd love to volunteer as a show
[01:18:14.880 --> 01:18:18.400]  producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give
[01:18:18.400 --> 01:18:23.680]  because I spent it all on supplements how can I help logos well I'm glad you
[01:18:23.680 --> 01:18:27.960]  asked whenever you order anything from Amazon you can help logos with ordering
[01:18:27.960 --> 01:18:31.880]  your supplies or holiday gifts first thing you do is clear your cookies now
[01:18:31.880 --> 01:18:38.600]  go to logos radio network.com click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it now when
[01:18:38.600 --> 01:18:43.880]  you order anything from Amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos do
[01:18:43.880 --> 01:18:48.600]  I pay extra no do I have to do anything different when I order no can I use my
[01:18:48.600 --> 01:18:54.160]  Amazon pride no I mean yes wow giving without doing anything or spending any
[01:18:54.160 --> 01:19:03.160]  money this is perfect thank you so much. We are logos. Happy Holidays Logos.
[01:19:03.160 --> 01:19:28.160]  Logos. Radio. Network. As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death I take a look at my life in real life.
[01:19:28.160 --> 01:19:35.160]  Because I've been laughing and laughing so long that even my mama thinks that my mind is gone.
[01:19:35.160 --> 01:19:38.160]  But I ain't never cross a man that didn't deserve it.
[01:19:38.160 --> 01:19:43.160]  To be treated like a punk you know that's unheard of. You better watch how you're talking.
[01:19:43.160 --> 01:19:47.160]  And when you're walking are you and your homies might be lying to talk.
[01:19:47.160 --> 01:19:53.160]  I really hate the drip but I got a loaf. As they croak I see myself in the pistol smoke pool.
[01:19:53.160 --> 01:19:58.160]  I'm the kind of thing a little homies want to be like on my knees in the night.
[01:19:58.160 --> 01:20:05.160]  Alright folks we are back. This is rule of law radio calling number 5126461984.
[01:20:05.160 --> 01:20:11.160]  We have this segment and two others to follow. We are talking to Sam in North Dakota.
[01:20:11.160 --> 01:20:14.160]  Alright Sam let's continue.
[01:20:14.160 --> 01:20:21.160]  I just have a maybe a suggestion for people that are having jury trials or going to have a jury trial.
[01:20:21.160 --> 01:20:25.160]  I got the chance to get called on a jury but I didn't get on.
[01:20:25.160 --> 01:20:29.160]  But I got the sent and watched the board year process. It went on for two days.
[01:20:29.160 --> 01:20:37.160]  And that attorney went through just about everybody in the county and he couldn't get a jury.
[01:20:37.160 --> 01:20:43.160]  It wasn't a murder case or anything. It was just a simple murder or something like that.
[01:20:43.160 --> 01:20:47.160]  I didn't even know what it for sure it was.
[01:20:47.160 --> 01:20:57.160]  So the way I learned a lot by just watching that he went over that jury pool in Bordar I guess you said.
[01:20:57.160 --> 01:21:05.160]  And got removed people. He got a few on there that would go along with what he had to say.
[01:21:05.160 --> 01:21:12.160]  You got to get him to agree to listen to your defense is what he is trying to do.
[01:21:12.160 --> 01:21:17.160]  It's just if people out there want to go jury and go watch them I guess.
[01:21:17.160 --> 01:21:20.160]  But I would say I didn't know that until I had that experience.
[01:21:20.160 --> 01:21:25.160]  If you go watch a trial you can get fined on or something. You learn a lot.
[01:21:25.160 --> 01:21:32.160]  There is a lot to be learned but the truth is the best thing of all to learn.
[01:21:32.160 --> 01:21:35.160]  And that is what they fear the most.
[01:21:35.160 --> 01:21:44.160]  People knowledgeable of the truth and the facts sitting in a jury that won't accept the prosecution side of the argument.
[01:21:44.160 --> 01:21:49.160]  Because they know better.
[01:21:49.160 --> 01:21:55.160]  That's what that attorney was after. I don't think any attorneys are good.
[01:21:55.160 --> 01:22:00.160]  He was good at what he was doing there. I learned procedure.
[01:22:00.160 --> 01:22:09.160]  Oh, I disagree. They are good for lots of things. Shark bait, target practice, testicle kick training dummy.
[01:22:09.160 --> 01:22:13.160]  Yeah, or greasing combine.
[01:22:13.160 --> 01:22:17.160]  Well, I guess that's all I have. I won't take any more time. Thank you for what you do.
[01:22:17.160 --> 01:22:21.160]  Thank you for calling in. Let us know how you like the seminar material.
[01:22:21.160 --> 01:22:25.160]  I encourage everybody to go out and purchase one gift for their friends or whatever.
[01:22:25.160 --> 01:22:34.160]  Christmas, birthday, birthday, whatever. There is so much information there. Even if you take your little steps and stuff there that you can learn anywhere else.
[01:22:34.160 --> 01:22:38.160]  I'm hoping to make the new version of it even more potent.
[01:22:38.160 --> 01:22:43.160]  Thank you then.
[01:22:43.160 --> 01:22:46.160]  Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in. We appreciate it.
[01:22:46.160 --> 01:22:48.160]  Bye bye.
[01:22:48.160 --> 01:22:54.160]  Alright, now we have Ramadan. Ramadan, what can we do for you?
[01:22:54.160 --> 01:22:57.160]  Hey, how are you Eddie? I'm good. You?
[01:22:57.160 --> 01:23:04.160]  I'm great, great. I am almost stuck.
[01:23:04.160 --> 01:23:16.160]  I had, last time I talked to you, I was talking to follow in motion for reconsideration of the dismissal from the appeal that I sent him to the Arizona Court of Appeal.
[01:23:16.160 --> 01:23:29.160]  And, man, I don't even know what to say about this, but I know they're doing something completely criminal. This is probably like the shortest denial I have ever seen on an order.
[01:23:29.160 --> 01:23:44.160]  It basically says, Court of Appeals admits the motion for consideration and it is denied. That's it. That's all it says.
[01:23:44.160 --> 01:23:48.160]  No kind of legal rebuttal, nothing, none whatsoever.
[01:23:48.160 --> 01:23:58.160]  So, all I'm left with now is the petition for review to the Arizona Supreme Court.
[01:23:58.160 --> 01:24:04.160]  And I am going to file it, but I might actually have very little time left to do it.
[01:24:04.160 --> 01:24:16.160]  But, when I've done in turn, because I knew they did something criminal wrong, so I was like, well, first of all, I looked at who was filing these, and then it says right here on the bottom, there were a judge pro temp.
[01:24:16.160 --> 01:24:23.160]  And if I know correctly, that's just an attorney. Am I correct?
[01:24:23.160 --> 01:24:32.160]  Yeah, well attorney pro temp means one operating temporarily in place of, or one that has been appointed in place of.
[01:24:32.160 --> 01:24:56.160]  For instance, if the regular county attorney is ill in the hospital, dead, removed from office and unavailable to prosecute, the court can put in an attorney pro temp to take his place temporarily until either a proper election can be held or for a particular case or cases.
[01:24:56.160 --> 01:25:09.160]  Okay. All right, all right. Yeah, that sounds about right. In this case, when it comes to these two pro temp judges, the first one actually dismissed the appeal upon arriving into the court of review.
[01:25:09.160 --> 01:25:14.160]  And then the second judge dismissed that denied the motion for reconsideration.
[01:25:14.160 --> 01:25:29.160]  I actually looked up the public record to give them the authority. And what I found was a Supreme Court order that elected them four of them.
[01:25:29.160 --> 01:25:48.160]  There were two out of the four total staff attorneys, and they were given specific rulings that they can give in criminal, in the pellet, I mean in the civil, criminal, juvenile type of cases.
[01:25:48.160 --> 01:25:49.160]  Right.
[01:25:49.160 --> 01:25:54.160]  Now guess what authorization they didn't have to give rulings on?
[01:25:54.160 --> 01:25:55.160]  To dismiss.
[01:25:55.160 --> 01:25:56.160]  To reconsideration.
[01:25:56.160 --> 01:25:57.160]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:25:57.160 --> 01:26:03.160]  To have the authorities to do that. In accordance to the order that I found in Arizona Supreme Court.
[01:26:03.160 --> 01:26:19.160]  Oh, good. Well, then file a petition with the Arizona Supreme Court for sanctions against these two judges and ask the Supreme Court to enter a ruling clarifying the order upon these judges as to the limit of their proper authority to make such rulings.
[01:26:19.160 --> 01:26:31.160]  Well, maybe I've done a little bit more rash, but I went to the Judicial Conduct Complaint to Chief Judge for allowing the staff attorneys to meet.
[01:26:31.160 --> 01:26:38.160]  Well, that's okay. That's fine that you went to their immediate superior and complained about what they did.
[01:26:38.160 --> 01:26:58.160]  But as you just stated, it is the State Supreme Court that gave them whatever authority they were allowed to exercise. And you need to make them aware of these attorneys acting beyond their lawful authority as granted by that court because that court has the power to sanction them.
[01:26:58.160 --> 01:27:10.160]  Whereas their direct superior may not, at least not in the same degree. In fact, the State Supreme Court has the power to remove their authority to practice law.
[01:27:10.160 --> 01:27:17.160]  Okay. Okay. Do we notice? So we say file a what?
[01:27:17.160 --> 01:27:29.160]  File a notice and a motion for clarification on the order as to what they could rule on.
[01:27:29.160 --> 01:27:49.160]  Yeah, a motion requesting clarification on the Supreme Court's order dated blah, blah, blah, numbered blah, blah, blah in relation to blah, blah, blah as to the authority of these attorney-proteim judges or judge-proteims to make rulings in relation to dismissals of motions for reconsideration.
[01:27:49.160 --> 01:27:54.160]  You can word it any way you want as long as what you want is clear.
[01:27:54.160 --> 01:27:55.160]  Okay.
[01:27:55.160 --> 01:27:56.160]  Good, good, good.
[01:27:56.160 --> 01:27:57.160]  Okay.
[01:27:57.160 --> 01:28:07.160]  And move for sanctions against them should the court find that they acted outside of their duly delegated authority by that order.
[01:28:07.160 --> 01:28:11.160]  Uh-huh, thanks, and then this is to motions to the Supreme Court.
[01:28:11.160 --> 01:28:12.160]  Correct.
[01:28:12.160 --> 01:28:14.160]  It was on the Supreme Court. Okay.
[01:28:14.160 --> 01:28:16.160]  Thanks, and uh...
[01:28:16.160 --> 01:28:26.160]  You can file it as a complaint. You can file it any way you want. But when it comes to asking them to take an action, that's going to have to be a motion of some kind.
[01:28:26.160 --> 01:28:27.160]  Okay.
[01:28:27.160 --> 01:28:28.160]  Okay.
[01:28:28.160 --> 01:28:36.160]  Um, well, yeah, I only have a very little fight left, and I got an expedition for review coming up next week.
[01:28:36.160 --> 01:28:49.160]  Got me at least the due date for it, and I'm trying to get it together now, citing, because you have to be very specific of that, and...
[01:28:49.160 --> 01:28:52.160]  Yeah, something they're actually not very good at.
[01:28:52.160 --> 01:29:01.160]  That, the more I studied, the more I've actually realized that they really just don't have a clue.
[01:29:01.160 --> 01:29:04.160]  And I'm like, are they just either they're blind or they're stupid?
[01:29:04.160 --> 01:29:05.160]  Like, in this case...
[01:29:05.160 --> 01:29:09.160]  Never underestimate their ability to be both.
[01:29:09.160 --> 01:29:14.160]  You correct me, I said it.
[01:29:14.160 --> 01:29:18.160]  Um, we'll see, um, so...
[01:29:18.160 --> 01:29:25.160]  Let me put it this way. You remember the fable of the blind man and the elephant?
[01:29:25.160 --> 01:29:27.160]  Blind and an elephant? No.
[01:29:27.160 --> 01:29:33.160]  Well, there's six blind men that are led up to an elephant, and each one is given a different part of the elephant to touch.
[01:29:33.160 --> 01:29:37.160]  One is ear, one is trunk, one is tail, one a leg, one is side, blah, blah, blah.
[01:29:37.160 --> 01:29:38.160]  Okay?
[01:29:38.160 --> 01:29:47.160]  And because it's the only place they touch the elephant, they all come away with a different mental picture of what an elephant is and looks like.
[01:29:47.160 --> 01:29:48.160]  Okay?
[01:29:48.160 --> 01:29:49.160]  Okay.
[01:29:49.160 --> 01:29:53.160]  So, hang on just a second and I'll finish that up on the other side when we get back.
[01:29:53.160 --> 01:30:18.160]  Alright folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang in there.
[01:30:23.160 --> 01:30:24.160]  Have to be that way.
[01:31:23.160 --> 01:31:31.160]  I lost my son.
[01:31:31.160 --> 01:31:32.160]  My nephew.
[01:31:32.160 --> 01:31:33.160]  My uncle.
[01:31:33.160 --> 01:31:34.160]  My son.
[01:31:34.160 --> 01:31:35.160]  On September 11th, 2000.
[01:31:35.160 --> 01:31:39.160]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[01:31:39.160 --> 01:31:43.160]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.160 --> 01:31:47.160]  Well, the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[01:31:47.160 --> 01:31:53.160]  2200 architects and engineers has looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.160 --> 01:31:54.160]  Bring justice to my son.
[01:31:54.160 --> 01:31:55.160]  My uncle.
[01:31:55.160 --> 01:31:56.160]  My nephew.
[01:31:56.160 --> 01:31:57.160]  My son.
[01:31:57.160 --> 01:31:58.160]  Go to building what.org.
[01:31:58.160 --> 01:31:59.160]  Why it fell.
[01:31:59.160 --> 01:32:00.160]  Why it matters.
[01:32:00.160 --> 01:32:01.160]  And what you can do.
[01:32:01.160 --> 01:32:03.160]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.160 --> 01:32:06.160]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.160 --> 01:32:11.160]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.160 --> 01:32:14.160]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.160 --> 01:32:20.160]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:20.160 --> 01:32:26.160]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.160 --> 01:32:31.160]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.160 --> 01:32:38.160]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.160 --> 01:32:45.160]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.160 --> 01:32:50.160]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:50.160 --> 01:32:56.160]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.160 --> 01:32:58.160]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.160 --> 01:33:01.160]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.160 --> 01:33:10.160]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:10.160 --> 01:33:18.160]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:18.160 --> 01:33:24.160]  I got to say, I have always loved the intro of that particular song by Dyer Straits.
[01:33:24.160 --> 01:33:26.160]  I've always loved the guitar portion of that.
[01:33:26.160 --> 01:33:30.160]  One of the reasons I picked it, but of course the money goes to Dyer Straits.
[01:33:30.160 --> 01:33:40.160]  I have always loved the intro of that particular song by Dyer Straits. I've always loved the guitar portion of that.
[01:33:40.160 --> 01:33:42.160]  One of the reasons I picked it, but of course the money for nothing was the most important aspect of it.
[01:33:42.160 --> 01:33:48.160]  Those lyrics going hand in hand with how these courts and attorneys in general operate.
[01:33:48.160 --> 01:33:52.160]  They always want your money for doing absolutely nothing.
[01:33:52.160 --> 01:33:58.160]  Alright, now Ramadan, back to the parable of the elephant and the six blind men.
[01:33:58.160 --> 01:34:02.160]  As I say, they're all allowed to touch only one part of the elephant.
[01:34:02.160 --> 01:34:07.160]  So they all come away with a different perspective on what an elephant is and what it looks like.
[01:34:07.160 --> 01:34:12.160]  The one who touches trunk thinks it's like a snake.
[01:34:12.160 --> 01:34:15.160]  The one that touches tail thinks he's like a slender tree branch.
[01:34:15.160 --> 01:34:18.160]  The one that touches leg thinks he's like a giant tree trunk.
[01:34:18.160 --> 01:34:21.160]  The one that touches side thinks he's a lot like a wall.
[01:34:21.160 --> 01:34:30.160]  The one that touched only his ears thinks he's a lot like a big fronded plant and so on and so forth.
[01:34:30.160 --> 01:34:40.160]  Now imagine giving that same task to a deaf, dumb and blind quadriplegic who can only use their forehead to touch the same parts of the elephant.
[01:34:40.160 --> 01:34:48.160]  Do you think that quadriplegic is going to come away with the same impression of that part that the blind men did, even though they're touching the exact same part?
[01:34:48.160 --> 01:34:53.160]  Is their forehead going to tell them what they need to know the same way the hands of the blind men did?
[01:34:53.160 --> 01:34:56.160]  Probably not.
[01:34:56.160 --> 01:35:03.160]  And now you know exactly how attorneys and judges approach law as a deaf, dumb and blind quadriplegic.
[01:35:03.160 --> 01:35:13.160]  Oh man, it's like I've been going at this for about a year.
[01:35:13.160 --> 01:35:22.160]  It started in what a truck started July 4th and down the road I just see ignorance and it's finding.
[01:35:22.160 --> 01:35:24.160]  No, no, no. That is not ignorance.
[01:35:24.160 --> 01:35:31.160]  What that is is verbal manipulation to skew the facts and reality to a suited purpose and outcome.
[01:35:31.160 --> 01:35:33.160]  That's what it is.
[01:35:33.160 --> 01:35:36.160]  In that way they are extremely intelligent.
[01:35:36.160 --> 01:35:42.160]  How can I spend the facts and terminology to suit the outcome I want?
[01:35:42.160 --> 01:35:46.160]  This is the problem with progressive and activist judges.
[01:35:46.160 --> 01:35:59.160]  They are attempting to rewrite law from the bench by giving interpretations that alter the specific legislative intent and meaning of the very law itself.
[01:35:59.160 --> 01:36:04.160]  Yeah, that works as well.
[01:36:04.160 --> 01:36:07.160]  And then they want to take credit for it.
[01:36:07.160 --> 01:36:15.160]  Yeah, that's the worst part, like they really did something.
[01:36:15.160 --> 01:36:18.160]  It's working my nerves, but I haven't given up yet.
[01:36:18.160 --> 01:36:24.160]  And even if I don't win this, then I'm making it as most difficult as it is for them to give my money.
[01:36:24.160 --> 01:36:31.160]  They're going to burn as much of their resources that they can in order to get this money from me.
[01:36:31.160 --> 01:36:33.160]  That's basically the way I see it.
[01:36:33.160 --> 01:36:41.160]  The sense that it hasn't really started off as the best way for me to make a defense from the very beginning.
[01:36:41.160 --> 01:36:48.160]  But actually, in this case, I'm actually putting together the petition for review.
[01:36:48.160 --> 01:36:53.160]  I'm putting together the reasons why it should warrant review.
[01:36:53.160 --> 01:37:00.160]  I'm actually taking little notes from other cases in Arizona that have been petitioned for review.
[01:37:00.160 --> 01:37:03.160]  Well, that's exactly what you're supposed to do. That's why they're there.
[01:37:03.160 --> 01:37:05.160]  Right.
[01:37:05.160 --> 01:37:07.160]  Yeah, that's exactly what I've been doing.
[01:37:07.160 --> 01:37:11.160]  And, you know, take a little bit from this case and a little bit from that case.
[01:37:11.160 --> 01:37:15.160]  Well, don't forget the citation for the case you take it from.
[01:37:15.160 --> 01:37:18.160]  Never cite the words of the case as your own.
[01:37:18.160 --> 01:37:24.160]  Always cite the case itself as the source of the word you're using, when and where they exist.
[01:37:24.160 --> 01:37:26.160]  Oh, of course, I know that.
[01:37:26.160 --> 01:37:31.160]  Right. I'm just making sure because there are some people who take it and try to use it as their own,
[01:37:31.160 --> 01:37:34.160]  but it's not authoritative when they do it that way.
[01:37:34.160 --> 01:37:36.160]  Oh, right.
[01:37:36.160 --> 01:37:38.160]  Of course.
[01:37:38.160 --> 01:37:43.160]  But I had one of the things, actually, I was reading a lot of cases.
[01:37:43.160 --> 01:37:45.160]  Well, I actually was trying to find case laws.
[01:37:45.160 --> 01:37:47.160]  I was searching for case mine.
[01:37:47.160 --> 01:37:50.160]  You familiar with that website about case law?
[01:37:50.160 --> 01:37:55.160]  No, I hadn't seen it, but if you'll send me a link to it, I'll be more than happy to look at it.
[01:37:55.160 --> 01:37:59.160]  Because I'm always looking for new and improved research tools.
[01:37:59.160 --> 01:38:02.160]  Yes, case mine.
[01:38:02.160 --> 01:38:05.160]  I will. I'll send you a link to it.
[01:38:05.160 --> 01:38:07.160]  It's pretty resourceful.
[01:38:07.160 --> 01:38:13.160]  You can put in different kind of keywords and statutes to help find you what you're looking for in this kind of court.
[01:38:13.160 --> 01:38:15.160]  It's great.
[01:38:15.160 --> 01:38:24.160]  I actually found out there has never been any precedent set on the statute that I'm contesting
[01:38:24.160 --> 01:38:30.160]  the requirement for designations required on stage to issue them political subdivision vehicles.
[01:38:30.160 --> 01:38:37.160]  So I'm like, hmm, that is going to be one of my reasons that it warrants petition of review.
[01:38:37.160 --> 01:38:40.160]  An issue of first impression.
[01:38:40.160 --> 01:38:51.160]  Did you have any advice on what I should do in the court when it comes to filing this?
[01:38:51.160 --> 01:38:53.160]  Have you ever done one to a Supreme Court?
[01:38:53.160 --> 01:38:58.160]  Not to a Supreme Court, no.
[01:38:58.160 --> 01:39:00.160]  Okay.
[01:39:00.160 --> 01:39:07.160]  I've done them to the courts of a court of appeals here as far as the initial way that they do things.
[01:39:07.160 --> 01:39:13.160]  Now, I've never seen a bigger collection of morons than in our court of appeals here.
[01:39:13.160 --> 01:39:15.160]  Well, I take that back.
[01:39:15.160 --> 01:39:19.160]  The Ninth Circuit Federal Court supersedes anybody I've ever seen.
[01:39:19.160 --> 01:39:26.160]  But some of these Texas circuit appeals courts, especially our third court of appeals,
[01:39:26.160 --> 01:39:34.160]  dare a collection of self-serving morons if ever any existed.
[01:39:34.160 --> 01:39:37.160]  Well, that does surprise me.
[01:39:37.160 --> 01:39:47.160]  But actually, speaking of the Ninth Circuit, have you heard of the beautiful precedent that was set in the U.S. Court of Appeals last year?
[01:39:47.160 --> 01:39:55.160]  They have finally ruled that that 30-day impound on a car, a vehicle, is illegal.
[01:39:55.160 --> 01:39:56.160]  And it's a seizure.
[01:39:56.160 --> 01:39:57.160]  Yeah.
[01:39:57.160 --> 01:40:02.160]  I was, oh, that is like one of the best things I've ever heard lately.
[01:40:02.160 --> 01:40:03.160]  Yeah.
[01:40:03.160 --> 01:40:16.160]  And the thing that I find the most egregious about the way they're conducting business is that they're essentially trying to make it appear as if the law does not mean what it says until a court says it does.
[01:40:16.160 --> 01:40:18.160]  Oh, yeah.
[01:40:18.160 --> 01:40:19.160]  And I mean...
[01:40:19.160 --> 01:40:20.160]  That's exactly so.
[01:40:20.160 --> 01:40:21.160]  Yeah.
[01:40:21.160 --> 01:40:25.160]  What is this BS on clearly established law?
[01:40:25.160 --> 01:40:39.160]  That means that until the court gives it a particular stamp of approval using a specific kind of terminology, the law does not mean what it clearly says it means and applies to.
[01:40:39.160 --> 01:40:48.160]  That is the most ludicrous method of running a government and a court system that I have ever seen, especially when a court is not authorized to make law.
[01:40:48.160 --> 01:40:56.160]  Yet, that is exactly the power they've given themselves by setting it a requirement of clearly established law.
[01:40:56.160 --> 01:40:58.160]  Well, the courts never ruled on it.
[01:40:58.160 --> 01:40:59.160]  So what?
[01:40:59.160 --> 01:41:03.160]  The legislature did when they created it.
[01:41:03.160 --> 01:41:09.160]  Yeah, and I actually saw the hearing.
[01:41:09.160 --> 01:41:15.160]  I actually saw the video footage of that hearing in the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit.
[01:41:15.160 --> 01:41:19.160]  And I was like, once they asked this, I knew their defense was done.
[01:41:19.160 --> 01:41:29.160]  He said, well, you have a meeting with the police, with the police department, and then he asked, is this a fair tribunal?
[01:41:29.160 --> 01:41:34.160]  And the defense, of course, they answered, well, no, it's not.
[01:41:34.160 --> 01:41:36.160]  I was like, boom, your kid's dead in the water.
[01:41:36.160 --> 01:41:37.160]  It's done.
[01:41:37.160 --> 01:41:38.160]  You have no defense.
[01:41:38.160 --> 01:41:39.160]  It's not a fair tribunal.
[01:41:39.160 --> 01:41:43.160]  You're going to go to the people who took your stuff and have a trial with them?
[01:41:43.160 --> 01:41:44.160]  Exactly.
[01:41:44.160 --> 01:41:51.160]  I mean, that's the way every civil asset forfeiture law is set up in every state.
[01:41:51.160 --> 01:41:58.160]  When they seize property and they do it, whether they do it under civil asset forfeiture or not, they treat the proceedings the same way.
[01:41:58.160 --> 01:42:12.160]  But under civil asset forfeiture, when they claim that your property's involved in a crime, the only people you can petition for its return are the same people that stole it, who are going to, of course, justify their theft.
[01:42:12.160 --> 01:42:14.160]  Of course.
[01:42:14.160 --> 01:42:33.160]  Whatever judge or court ruled that civil asset forfeiture was constitutional or that the initiation of actions against an inanimate object was constitutional should have been the first drawn-and-quartered a-hole on the planet in the modern century.
[01:42:33.160 --> 01:42:36.160]  They need to be struck by lightning is what they need.
[01:42:36.160 --> 01:42:37.160]  No, that's too quick.
[01:42:37.160 --> 01:42:41.160]  I'm going with the drawn-and-quartered Braveheart method.
[01:42:41.160 --> 01:42:44.160]  The Mel Gibson meets the end method.
[01:42:44.160 --> 01:42:50.160]  That's what I want to see each and every one of these people go through.
[01:42:50.160 --> 01:42:51.160]  Yes.
[01:42:51.160 --> 01:42:52.160]  Oh, my goodness.
[01:42:52.160 --> 01:42:54.160]  Yeah, that's quite the rigmaroo.
[01:42:54.160 --> 01:42:57.160]  Well, I wish me luck on this case.
[01:42:57.160 --> 01:42:59.160]  You don't sound like luck is what you need.
[01:42:59.160 --> 01:43:02.160]  You just need somebody to follow the law.
[01:43:02.160 --> 01:43:05.160]  And in that regard, I wish you well.
[01:43:05.160 --> 01:43:06.160]  Somebody like that.
[01:43:06.160 --> 01:43:07.160]  Yes.
[01:43:07.160 --> 01:43:08.160]  Thank you.
[01:43:08.160 --> 01:43:12.160]  It's been fun this whole week, but I'm running out of appealable error.
[01:43:12.160 --> 01:43:14.160]  I'm running out of appeals.
[01:43:14.160 --> 01:43:17.160]  How can you ever run out of appealable error?
[01:43:17.160 --> 01:43:21.160]  The fact that they showed up to hear it was appealable error.
[01:43:21.160 --> 01:43:22.160]  Oh, OK.
[01:43:22.160 --> 01:43:24.160]  I guess that's a bit wrong.
[01:43:24.160 --> 01:43:29.160]  But yeah, I'm running out of choices of appeal, rather.
[01:43:29.160 --> 01:43:30.160]  Yeah.
[01:43:30.160 --> 01:43:33.160]  This is my last one, I think.
[01:43:33.160 --> 01:43:38.160]  But thank you, Eddie, for the sanctions.
[01:43:38.160 --> 01:43:41.160]  I'm actually looking to doing that against those folks here.
[01:43:41.160 --> 01:43:42.160]  Yes, sir.
[01:43:42.160 --> 01:43:46.160]  Just shoot them in every place you got an access point.
[01:43:46.160 --> 01:43:47.160]  Yes, sir.
[01:43:47.160 --> 01:43:48.160]  You have a good night.
[01:43:48.160 --> 01:43:49.160]  You too.
[01:43:49.160 --> 01:43:50.160]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:43:50.160 --> 01:43:51.160]  All right, folks.
[01:43:51.160 --> 01:43:53.160]  I am coming up on my last segment.
[01:43:53.160 --> 01:43:55.160]  I will try to clean out the collar board.
[01:43:55.160 --> 01:43:56.160]  I wish me luck.
[01:43:56.160 --> 01:44:00.160]  I'll be right back.
[01:44:00.160 --> 01:44:03.160]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:44:03.160 --> 01:44:06.160]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion,
[01:44:06.160 --> 01:44:09.160]  and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:09.160 --> 01:44:13.160]  Did you know the US government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:44:13.160 --> 01:44:17.160]  and classified it as a Schedule 1 drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.160 --> 01:44:20.160]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years,
[01:44:20.160 --> 01:44:23.160]  and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:44:23.160 --> 01:44:27.160]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.160 --> 01:44:30.160]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.160 --> 01:44:33.160]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:44:33.160 --> 01:44:36.160]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder
[01:44:36.160 --> 01:44:39.160]  is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.160 --> 01:44:43.160]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein.
[01:44:43.160 --> 01:44:46.160]  It's gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO,
[01:44:46.160 --> 01:44:48.160]  and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.160 --> 01:44:51.160]  Call 888-910-4367.
[01:44:51.160 --> 01:44:56.160]  888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you.
[01:44:56.160 --> 01:44:59.160]  Only at hempUSA.org.
[01:45:26.160 --> 01:45:28.160]  And now you can, too.
[01:45:28.160 --> 01:45:31.160]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.160 --> 01:45:34.160]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.160 --> 01:45:36.160]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:36.160 --> 01:45:39.160]  you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.160 --> 01:45:43.160]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.160 --> 01:45:48.160]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:48.160 --> 01:45:52.160]  forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.160 --> 01:45:56.160]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.160 --> 01:46:23.160]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:56.160 --> 01:47:09.160]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:47:09.160 --> 01:47:12.160]  We are now into our last segment for the Monday Night Show,
[01:47:12.160 --> 01:47:16.160]  and I am going to try to burn through these calls just as quickly as I can.
[01:47:16.160 --> 01:47:18.160]  All right, Angel, I see you on the board.
[01:47:18.160 --> 01:47:19.160]  What do you have?
[01:47:19.160 --> 01:47:22.160]  And is it on point with anything we've been talking about so far tonight?
[01:47:22.160 --> 01:47:27.160]  Hello, Angel.
[01:47:27.160 --> 01:47:28.160]  Hello?
[01:47:28.160 --> 01:47:29.160]  Hello?
[01:47:29.160 --> 01:47:30.160]  Eric.
[01:47:30.160 --> 01:47:31.160]  Yes?
[01:47:31.160 --> 01:47:32.160]  Eric.
[01:47:32.160 --> 01:47:33.160]  Yes?
[01:47:33.160 --> 01:47:35.160]  I mean, I thought it was recording.
[01:47:35.160 --> 01:47:36.160]  No?
[01:47:36.160 --> 01:47:38.160]  I didn't know it was live.
[01:47:38.160 --> 01:47:39.160]  Yes, it's live.
[01:47:39.160 --> 01:47:40.160]  How are you doing, man?
[01:47:40.160 --> 01:47:41.160]  I'm doing fine.
[01:47:41.160 --> 01:47:51.160]  Hey, do you remember the case, the ticket I was given?
[01:47:51.160 --> 01:47:57.160]  I was given for walking against the control signal for this thing, like?
[01:47:57.160 --> 01:48:00.160]  I think so.
[01:48:00.160 --> 01:48:01.160]  The one?
[01:48:01.160 --> 01:48:02.160]  Yes.
[01:48:02.160 --> 01:48:07.160]  The case that I called you the first time that I called you the first time.
[01:48:07.160 --> 01:48:09.160]  Yeah, like I said, I think so.
[01:48:09.160 --> 01:48:10.160]  Yes.
[01:48:10.160 --> 01:48:13.160]  Anyways, I beat it.
[01:48:13.160 --> 01:48:14.160]  I won.
[01:48:14.160 --> 01:48:15.160]  Good.
[01:48:15.160 --> 01:48:16.160]  I'm glad to hear that.
[01:48:16.160 --> 01:48:18.160]  That's the kind of stuff I like to hear.
[01:48:18.160 --> 01:48:24.160]  People that do, that call us, get the correct information and use it accordingly.
[01:48:24.160 --> 01:48:26.160]  Man, let me tell you how I won.
[01:48:26.160 --> 01:48:29.160]  But first of all, thank God, my Lord Jesus Christ.
[01:48:29.160 --> 01:48:30.160]  Thank you all.
[01:48:30.160 --> 01:48:37.160]  Thanks to you, man, because I used all your arguments and all the stuff that I found on
[01:48:37.160 --> 01:48:42.160]  YouTube, the stuff that we talked on the last time.
[01:48:42.160 --> 01:48:55.160]  And I put out, fabricated the motion to dismiss and they didn't even, when I went to court,
[01:48:55.160 --> 01:49:00.160]  they didn't even accept the motion.
[01:49:00.160 --> 01:49:06.160]  The judge accepted the prosecutor's motion to dismiss the case.
[01:49:06.160 --> 01:49:07.160]  Yeah.
[01:49:07.160 --> 01:49:13.160]  In other words, they didn't want people to hear what was in that motion.
[01:49:13.160 --> 01:49:14.160]  Yeah.
[01:49:14.160 --> 01:49:15.160]  And that's generally the way it works.
[01:49:15.160 --> 01:49:20.160]  When you write a motion that contains the law in a way they can't refute it to get what
[01:49:20.160 --> 01:49:25.160]  they want, dismissal is the only course of action they've got because you can sue them
[01:49:25.160 --> 01:49:27.160]  if they pursue it.
[01:49:27.160 --> 01:49:29.160]  It's called malicious prosecution.
[01:49:29.160 --> 01:49:30.160]  Yes.
[01:49:30.160 --> 01:49:31.160]  It was beautiful.
[01:49:31.160 --> 01:49:37.160]  It was like I was more happy than I leave fighting a little bit of guy.
[01:49:37.160 --> 01:49:38.160]  You know what I'm saying?
[01:49:38.160 --> 01:49:39.160]  Yeah.
[01:49:39.160 --> 01:49:40.160]  I know what you're saying.
[01:49:40.160 --> 01:49:41.160]  I took him out.
[01:49:41.160 --> 01:49:42.160]  Yeah.
[01:49:42.160 --> 01:49:43.160]  All right.
[01:49:43.160 --> 01:49:44.160]  Well, I'm glad to hear that.
[01:49:44.160 --> 01:49:45.160]  Yeah, man.
[01:49:45.160 --> 01:49:49.160]  This is a message to everyone listening.
[01:49:49.160 --> 01:49:51.160]  This stuff really works, man.
[01:49:51.160 --> 01:50:01.160]  If a guy like me who's English, not the first language, and I'm not a very, let's say,
[01:50:01.160 --> 01:50:10.160]  eloquent, but if you feel you're correct in something, you always got to fight for that.
[01:50:10.160 --> 01:50:12.160]  And I thank you very much, man.
[01:50:12.160 --> 01:50:13.160]  I thank you.
[01:50:13.160 --> 01:50:14.160]  You're very welcome.
[01:50:14.160 --> 01:50:15.160]  I'm glad I can help.
[01:50:15.160 --> 01:50:17.160]  An email of the motion.
[01:50:17.160 --> 01:50:23.160]  Another thing, I used some of the stuff you said almost word by word.
[01:50:23.160 --> 01:50:28.160]  I put it in quotations, but I didn't cite your name.
[01:50:28.160 --> 01:50:35.160]  I didn't cite your name just because I didn't want to put you in some type of jeopardy.
[01:50:35.160 --> 01:50:38.160]  Well, that wouldn't be what you would have done.
[01:50:38.160 --> 01:50:42.160]  If you cited my name, then they would have ignored it because you're trying to cite me
[01:50:42.160 --> 01:50:43.160]  as an authority.
[01:50:43.160 --> 01:50:44.160]  That won't help.
[01:50:44.160 --> 01:50:49.160]  So if you're going to quote something I've told you as an argument, then that is what
[01:50:49.160 --> 01:50:54.160]  you want to keep as words of your own to make it appear that you said it for the purpose
[01:50:54.160 --> 01:50:55.160]  of that motion.
[01:50:55.160 --> 01:51:00.160]  What you don't want to do that is when you're citing a court case, you want to cite the
[01:51:00.160 --> 01:51:06.160]  court case as the source of the authority that you're arguing about.
[01:51:06.160 --> 01:51:10.160]  So that's the difference between taking what I tell you and putting it in a motion and
[01:51:10.160 --> 01:51:13.160]  what a court says that goes in your motion.
[01:51:13.160 --> 01:51:15.160]  That's exactly what I did.
[01:51:15.160 --> 01:51:20.160]  But obviously the arguments there, they were in mind alone.
[01:51:20.160 --> 01:51:23.160]  They were arguments borrowed from you.
[01:51:23.160 --> 01:51:29.160]  And obviously I made it sound like they were mind arguments.
[01:51:29.160 --> 01:51:39.160]  But I thought that it was correct to let you know that I used your language and your stuff
[01:51:39.160 --> 01:51:41.160]  that it was in all mind.
[01:51:41.160 --> 01:51:43.160]  So I appreciate that.
[01:51:43.160 --> 01:51:47.160]  And believe it or not, most of the people that let me know that they've won admit that they've
[01:51:47.160 --> 01:51:49.160]  done a lot of the same thing.
[01:51:49.160 --> 01:51:53.160]  They will record or write down everything I'm saying so that they can put it into that
[01:51:53.160 --> 01:51:55.160]  motion almost verbatim.
[01:51:55.160 --> 01:51:57.160]  Exactly, exactly.
[01:51:57.160 --> 01:52:03.160]  I mean, you pretty much have done the whole word for us.
[01:52:03.160 --> 01:52:06.160]  The only thing we have to do is to listen.
[01:52:06.160 --> 01:52:11.160]  And go and look for those codes, so I went and looked for everything you said,
[01:52:11.160 --> 01:52:23.160]  every single code, and I found more stuff in there that I used to bolster my case.
[01:52:23.160 --> 01:52:28.160]  Yeah, and that's where the part of doing the additional work so that you fully understand
[01:52:28.160 --> 01:52:32.160]  what you're going to be arguing about and what works in your favor and what doesn't.
[01:52:32.160 --> 01:52:36.160]  If you don't understand all those things, then you're going in there only halfway
[01:52:36.160 --> 01:52:38.160]  prepared to fight.
[01:52:38.160 --> 01:52:39.160]  That's what you've got to do.
[01:52:39.160 --> 01:52:43.160]  You're due diligence to study and be sure that you know the subject well.
[01:52:43.160 --> 01:52:47.160]  If you did that, praises to you, man, because that's what you've got to do to win.
[01:52:47.160 --> 01:52:53.160]  Yeah, I mean, it's not like only listening and writing and arguing.
[01:52:53.160 --> 01:53:01.160]  I wanted to prove that everything you said was correct and it could be found where you
[01:53:01.160 --> 01:53:03.160]  said it could be found.
[01:53:03.160 --> 01:53:06.160]  I did that exact same thing.
[01:53:06.160 --> 01:53:09.160]  I was like, man, this guy is 100% true.
[01:53:09.160 --> 01:53:17.160]  So I didn't hesitate in using everything that I used to win.
[01:53:17.160 --> 01:53:23.160]  One more thing.
[01:53:23.160 --> 01:53:30.160]  It escaped me, but anyway, it is powerful to win.
[01:53:30.160 --> 01:53:32.160]  It feels nice.
[01:53:32.160 --> 01:53:34.160]  It feels very good.
[01:53:34.160 --> 01:53:36.160]  It feels very good.
[01:53:36.160 --> 01:53:38.160]  I'm sure it does.
[01:53:38.160 --> 01:53:40.160]  Congratulations, man.
[01:53:40.160 --> 01:53:44.160]  Let me see if I can get to these other people before I'm out of time here, okay?
[01:53:44.160 --> 01:53:45.160]  Sure, sure.
[01:53:45.160 --> 01:53:47.160]  All right, thanks for calling in, Angel.
[01:53:47.160 --> 01:53:48.160]  Okay.
[01:53:48.160 --> 01:53:49.160]  All right, bye-bye.
[01:53:49.160 --> 01:53:50.160]  Thank you very much.
[01:53:50.160 --> 01:53:51.160]  Yes, sir.
[01:53:51.160 --> 01:53:53.160]  All right, now we have Ken in New York.
[01:53:53.160 --> 01:53:55.160]  Ken, what do you got?
[01:53:55.160 --> 01:54:02.160]  I don't have a problem, but you said something before that really caught my attention because
[01:54:02.160 --> 01:54:09.160]  even though I've been listening since 2008, I don't remember hearing it before and has
[01:54:09.160 --> 01:54:11.160]  to do with not making...
[01:54:11.160 --> 01:54:13.160]  You can go into court.
[01:54:13.160 --> 01:54:18.160]  Let's say I get dragged into court and we'll just use, for an example, a death case, a hospital
[01:54:18.160 --> 01:54:22.160]  death is what I usually end up getting involved with.
[01:54:22.160 --> 01:54:29.160]  You said that I don't have to make a plea, and if a plea is entered for me, that's a violation
[01:54:29.160 --> 01:54:30.160]  of procedure or...
[01:54:30.160 --> 01:54:35.160]  If you have not been given proper notice and the court's jurisdiction has not been properly
[01:54:35.160 --> 01:54:40.160]  invoked, then where do they have the authority to enter a plea?
[01:54:40.160 --> 01:54:42.160]  Okay, interesting.
[01:54:42.160 --> 01:54:43.160]  And what is the effect?
[01:54:43.160 --> 01:54:50.160]  And if I say I don't want to enter a plea for the purposes of that hearing, what...
[01:54:50.160 --> 01:54:54.160]  I never say that because that constitutes a refusal.
[01:54:54.160 --> 01:55:01.160]  What you say is, is the court attempting to compel me to enter an unconscionable plea?
[01:55:01.160 --> 01:55:05.160]  Ah, okay, okay.
[01:55:05.160 --> 01:55:07.160]  All right, I get it now.
[01:55:07.160 --> 01:55:08.160]  Okay.
[01:55:08.160 --> 01:55:12.160]  And again, do I have to make a plea one way or the other?
[01:55:12.160 --> 01:55:17.160]  No, there is no law that can require the accused to enter a plea on their own behalf.
[01:55:17.160 --> 01:55:23.160]  The law that allows the court to enter a plea if the accused refuses to enter a plea of
[01:55:23.160 --> 01:55:25.160]  their own volition.
[01:55:25.160 --> 01:55:28.160]  But that's all they're allowed to do is to enter a plea of not guilty.
[01:55:28.160 --> 01:55:34.160]  Not one of guilty, not one of no contest, only that of not guilty.
[01:55:34.160 --> 01:55:40.160]  But the problem is, without proper jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person, they
[01:55:40.160 --> 01:55:44.160]  don't have jurisdiction to enter a plea.
[01:55:44.160 --> 01:55:46.160]  And that is the argument.
[01:55:46.160 --> 01:55:51.160]  No proof in the record of jurisdiction, no proper charging instrument to invoke said
[01:55:51.160 --> 01:55:57.160]  jurisdiction, no ability to demand or accept the plea.
[01:55:57.160 --> 01:56:00.160]  Very good.
[01:56:00.160 --> 01:56:08.160]  And there was an event recently in New York, and to celebrate it, I just made $100 donation.
[01:56:08.160 --> 01:56:15.160]  We took down the Attorney General in New York, whose minions came after me on a hospital
[01:56:15.160 --> 01:56:18.160]  debt suit about three years ago.
[01:56:18.160 --> 01:56:21.160]  Well, congratulations and thank you.
[01:56:21.160 --> 01:56:23.160]  Oh, of course.
[01:56:23.160 --> 01:56:30.160]  I just want to pass, if Deborah's listening, it's another 101 book from Randy.
[01:56:30.160 --> 01:56:33.160]  I'm doing an outreach program.
[01:56:33.160 --> 01:56:34.160]  All right.
[01:56:34.160 --> 01:56:36.160]  This is one of my brothers.
[01:56:36.160 --> 01:56:37.160]  All right.
[01:56:37.160 --> 01:56:39.160]  Well, we appreciate that too.
[01:56:39.160 --> 01:56:42.160]  Oh, not at all.
[01:56:42.160 --> 01:56:51.160]  I was given a choice of a debt payment today on a hospital, and it freed up.
[01:56:51.160 --> 01:56:55.160]  I thought I was going to have to pay out $3,100 all at once.
[01:56:55.160 --> 01:57:01.160]  And they said that they wanted, I've always detected overbilling in hospital bills.
[01:57:01.160 --> 01:57:04.160]  I'm very good at that.
[01:57:04.160 --> 01:57:09.160]  And they wanted to, they said I would have to pay $87 a month.
[01:57:09.160 --> 01:57:14.160]  And they said, well, look, I'm 65 and I got a minimum wage part-time job in retirement.
[01:57:14.160 --> 01:57:15.160]  I said, I'll do 40.
[01:57:15.160 --> 01:57:19.160]  And they said, okay, they didn't even argue with me.
[01:57:19.160 --> 01:57:20.160]  Yeah.
[01:57:20.160 --> 01:57:24.160]  Well, all they wanted was your consent to make a payment and agreement to do so, because
[01:57:24.160 --> 01:57:28.160]  they recorded that conversation and now they've got you in a binding agreement.
[01:57:28.160 --> 01:57:30.160]  Oh, I'm sure.
[01:57:30.160 --> 01:57:31.160]  I'm sure.
[01:57:31.160 --> 01:57:35.160]  But you know, when I had the intake papers on the hospital, I put above my name without
[01:57:35.160 --> 01:57:36.160]  prejudice.
[01:57:36.160 --> 01:57:39.160]  But you see $1,308.
[01:57:39.160 --> 01:57:42.160]  Yeah, but that doesn't leave you of an agreement that you make.
[01:57:42.160 --> 01:57:46.160]  And it only reserves rights that you didn't intend to waive.
[01:57:46.160 --> 01:57:47.160]  Right.
[01:57:47.160 --> 01:57:53.160]  But any agreement you made will have an inherent waiver of rights, like the ability to say,
[01:57:53.160 --> 01:57:56.160]  I don't owe the debt at some future date.
[01:57:56.160 --> 01:57:58.160]  Oh, no, I didn't do that.
[01:57:58.160 --> 01:57:59.160]  This case, I couldn't do it.
[01:57:59.160 --> 01:58:01.160]  This wasn't like the last case I had.
[01:58:01.160 --> 01:58:03.160]  Well, that's another story.
[01:58:03.160 --> 01:58:05.160]  But thank you and good night.
[01:58:05.160 --> 01:58:06.160]  Yes, sir.
[01:58:06.160 --> 01:58:07.160]  Thank you.
[01:58:07.160 --> 01:58:08.160]  All right, folks.
[01:58:08.160 --> 01:58:12.160]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:12.160 --> 01:58:18.160]  I want to thank you all very much for listening and for remembering to please donate whenever
[01:58:18.160 --> 01:58:20.160]  and however much you can.
[01:58:20.160 --> 01:58:21.160]  We are in desperate need here.
[01:58:21.160 --> 01:58:24.160]  That is not a joke, but it is a plea.
[01:58:24.160 --> 01:58:28.160]  So please help us out whenever you can, however much you can.
[01:58:28.160 --> 01:58:31.160]  Folks, I hope that y'all have a great week.
[01:58:31.160 --> 01:58:50.160]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:50.160 --> 01:59:16.160]  Thank you.
[01:59:20.160 --> 01:59:49.160]  Thank you.
[01:59:51.160 --> 01:59:53.160]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:53.160 --> 01:59:54.160]  You found it.
[01:59:54.160 --> 02:00:20.160]  LogosRadioNetwork.com.