ROL_2018-05-11_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:29.520]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22 an ounce.
[00:29.520 --> 00:41.200]  Silver $16.68 an ounce, Texas Crude $65.51 a barrel, Bitcoin $6,902.19, Ethereum $420.80,
[00:41.200 --> 00:55.480]  Bitcoin Cash $652.90, and Finanly Lite Coins $114.34 a crypto coin.
[00:55.480 --> 01:01.200]  Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act
[01:01.200 --> 01:06.160]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color,
[01:06.160 --> 01:08.040]  religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:08.040 --> 01:13.200]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.200 --> 01:18.320]  in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:18.320 --> 01:27.960]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seemed to reach new levels after a chemical attack
[01:27.960 --> 01:32.240]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:32.240 --> 01:36.680]  is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:36.680 --> 01:41.440]  United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:41.440 --> 01:43.320]  evidence as of yet.
[01:43.320 --> 01:47.160]  President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and
[01:47.160 --> 01:51.520]  all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new
[01:51.520 --> 01:52.520]  and smart.
[01:52.520 --> 01:56.440]  Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who
[01:56.440 --> 01:58.600]  kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:58.600 --> 02:02.640]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[02:02.640 --> 02:06.520]  attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:06.520 --> 02:11.040]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization
[02:11.040 --> 02:15.680]  for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the sign of the chemical slaughter.
[02:15.680 --> 02:19.400]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil
[02:19.400 --> 02:24.000]  war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[02:24.000 --> 02:28.760]  rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[02:28.760 --> 02:32.520]  notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.520 --> 02:37.840]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakhova posted on Facebook
[02:37.840 --> 02:42.160]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[02:42.160 --> 02:47.080]  has been fighting terrorists, or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[02:47.080 --> 03:15.760]  strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at.
[03:47.080 --> 03:57.520]  Okay, howdy howdy, Randy Kelton, Rula Law Radio.
[03:57.520 --> 04:06.760]  On this the 11th day of May, 2018, we are up for our four-hour info marathon.
[04:06.760 --> 04:14.160]  We have our phone lines open, or there will be as soon as I open them, okay, phone lines
[04:14.160 --> 04:15.160]  are open.
[04:15.160 --> 04:24.160]  I'll call in number 512-646-1984, and we're hoping to get a special guest to call in,
[04:24.160 --> 04:25.160]  Mr. Ron Avery.
[04:25.160 --> 04:30.800]  We're hoping he'll call in on our guest bridge, and if Ron Avery's out there listening, he
[04:30.800 --> 04:32.360]  doesn't know what the guest bridge is.
[04:32.360 --> 04:39.200]  If your number is, if you don't remember it, he can send me a text, and I will send it
[04:39.200 --> 04:40.200]  to him.
[04:40.200 --> 04:46.760]  But we're hoping that he comes on, we're having another Architects and Engineer, it's for
[04:46.760 --> 04:51.720]  an 9-11 meeting here coming up soon, and he wanted to come on and talk about it, so we're
[04:51.720 --> 04:55.320]  hoping he calls in soon.
[04:55.320 --> 04:59.600]  So if you have a, but in the meantime, if you have a question or comment, give us a call,
[04:59.600 --> 05:08.440]  or call in number 512-646-1984, and I'm going to start out talking about where we're at
[05:08.440 --> 05:17.240]  with our online electronic paralegal.
[05:17.240 --> 05:29.960]  I have enough together to launch the traffic site, but I am reluctant to do so because
[05:29.960 --> 05:35.400]  it's all kind of bad stuff that's likely to happen if I launch that too soon, because
[05:35.400 --> 05:42.280]  if we launch it now, it will shut down traffic enforcement in Texas, and while I really want
[05:42.280 --> 05:49.560]  to do that, I have to be careful because there are other people out there looking at what's
[05:49.560 --> 05:50.560]  going on.
[05:50.560 --> 05:54.160]  If they get a good look at what I'm doing, there are folks out there that will figure
[05:54.160 --> 06:01.320]  it out pretty quick and can throw a whole bunch of money at it and wind up with a product
[06:01.320 --> 06:06.840]  out there in front of me, so I'm kind of dancing on the head of the pen here to figure out
[06:06.840 --> 06:10.080]  how best to implement this thing.
[06:10.080 --> 06:16.000]  I have three callers in already, so I won't waste a lot of your time blabbing about this
[06:16.000 --> 06:20.880]  electronic lawyer I've been talking about for the last 10 years.
[06:20.880 --> 06:24.160]  Let's start out by going to Sunny in Georgia.
[06:24.160 --> 06:31.720]  Hello, when I missed it, I said I missed it, my caller page is kind of jumping around
[06:31.720 --> 06:32.720]  on me.
[06:32.720 --> 06:39.240]  I've got Rick at the top, oh, let me hang on, let me hold on just a little bit.
[06:39.240 --> 06:47.000]  I think what's going on is my producer is screening the calls for me.
[06:47.000 --> 06:54.000]  Okay, now I've got a whole board full of callers, so I'm going to start with Rick in Texas.
[06:54.000 --> 06:55.000]  Hello, Rick.
[06:55.000 --> 06:56.000]  Hello, Andy.
[06:56.000 --> 06:57.000]  Can you hear me?
[06:57.000 --> 06:58.000]  I can hear you.
[06:58.000 --> 06:59.000]  What do you have for us today?
[06:59.000 --> 07:14.440]  Well, I thought we might talk about how I will approach the guy that did the work out
[07:14.440 --> 07:15.680]  at Faith Academy.
[07:15.680 --> 07:24.640]  He just sent the vague repair letter to the prosecutors with just $800 on it, track the
[07:24.640 --> 07:31.440]  pair, that's all it reads, so I'd like to talk about how, I can send him a letter, but
[07:31.440 --> 07:32.840]  how do I address my shelf?
[07:32.840 --> 07:37.520]  I would probably wonder who are you, why do you want this?
[07:37.520 --> 07:51.480]  Okay, you title your letter with the court heading on it and call it request for discovery.
[07:51.480 --> 07:59.960]  You put the standard court heading, the request for discovery, and send it to him.
[07:59.960 --> 08:09.640]  Actually since he's not a litigant, you might need to subpoena him, so that might be even
[08:09.640 --> 08:10.640]  better.
[08:10.640 --> 08:17.680]  We'll put together a request for a subpoena and ask the court to subpoena these records.
[08:17.680 --> 08:24.000]  Now, if you were an attorney, you could file a subpoena yourself, but they discriminate
[08:24.000 --> 08:30.680]  against us, two-bit chump proceeds, and we can't file our own subpoenas, we have to get
[08:30.680 --> 08:33.000]  the court to do it for us.
[08:33.000 --> 08:38.040]  So we'll file a request for a subpoena, and what will happen is, is a prosecuting attorney
[08:38.040 --> 08:44.040]  will object to it, because he knows that when these people get a subpoena, they're going
[08:44.040 --> 08:45.840]  to get real excited.
[08:45.840 --> 08:59.240]  They were either talked into filing this bogus invoice, and now they're afraid they're going
[08:59.240 --> 09:07.240]  to have to come in and court and testify to it under oath, or they never filed it in the
[09:07.240 --> 09:12.240]  first place.
[09:12.240 --> 09:16.320]  Because what I saw on the subpoena looked like some garbage, somebody stuck together
[09:16.320 --> 09:22.200]  on a word processor.
[09:22.200 --> 09:31.240]  So here we petition the court to issue a subpoena for an itemized list of the work performed
[09:31.240 --> 09:34.240]  on this job.
[09:34.240 --> 09:36.240]  Okay.
[09:36.240 --> 09:42.120]  Does that kind of answer your question?
[09:42.120 --> 09:43.120]  It does.
[09:43.120 --> 09:55.160]  Just look up subpoena and process subpoena, and we'll give you some pretty good instructions
[09:55.160 --> 09:56.160]  on how to do that.
[09:56.160 --> 09:57.160]  Okay.
[09:57.160 --> 09:58.160]  Sounds good.
[09:58.160 --> 10:05.280]  Hey, I have a bit of good news to share with you.
[10:05.280 --> 10:09.080]  So there was another case that I didn't bother you about, it is a Class C, you know, that
[10:09.080 --> 10:15.080]  I feel pretty comfortable fighting Class C's myself, this is something that happened
[10:15.080 --> 10:16.080]  last July.
[10:16.080 --> 10:22.880]  I was charged with passing someone on the shoulder, you know, it was a drove on improved
[10:22.880 --> 10:28.600]  shoulder but not authorized, and I sent them the law stating that you may do that to avoid
[10:28.600 --> 10:37.400]  a collision, and they had it set for a jury trial for the 23rd of this month, and we'd
[10:37.400 --> 10:43.120]  gone back and forth many times, actually they had, you know, given me the run around, you
[10:43.120 --> 10:48.120]  know, to show up to court, so I followed a judicial conduct complaint on my judge, and
[10:48.120 --> 10:51.880]  they kind of stopped doing, kind of started sending paperwork the right way, but today
[10:51.880 --> 10:54.320]  I got a motion to dismiss.
[10:54.320 --> 11:01.880]  The complaining witness has requested dismissal, and see at the bottom, other of the complaining
[11:01.880 --> 11:05.960]  witness is unwilling to testify and has requested a dismissal.
[11:05.960 --> 11:09.680]  However, on motion to dismiss, but that was nice to come home to.
[11:09.680 --> 11:13.200]  Did you object to that?
[11:13.200 --> 11:17.720]  How dare they dismiss this case after all this time?
[11:17.720 --> 11:21.200]  Right, right, right.
[11:21.200 --> 11:27.280]  So, you know, I'm hoping for the best for this other one that we're working on as well,
[11:27.280 --> 11:28.280]  you know.
[11:28.280 --> 11:37.760]  But I've been working on a complaint to the Texas Rangers for a guy in Tyler.
[11:37.760 --> 11:46.640]  When I finish that one, I have an appeal to write, and as soon as I get the appeal done,
[11:46.640 --> 11:53.160]  then I'll be on your complaint to the Texas Ranger, and then they may be getting, especially
[11:53.160 --> 12:01.040]  when you request a subpoena, you might want to request a subpoena from, okay, hold on,
[12:01.040 --> 12:03.560]  let me step back.
[12:03.560 --> 12:08.440]  Let's think strategically.
[12:08.440 --> 12:14.920]  From the perspective that this invoice, essentially, okay, for those of you who don't know, Rick
[12:14.920 --> 12:22.480]  drove around what turned out to be a jogging track, and they accused him of damaging the
[12:22.480 --> 12:34.320]  dirt at this Christian Academy, and they wrote him a citation for damage under $50, and then
[12:34.320 --> 12:37.680]  when he fought the citation, they came back.
[12:37.680 --> 12:44.000]  How many months later, Rick, with the invoice or with the complaint claiming over $750?
[12:44.000 --> 12:51.680]  Yes, it was a whole half year later that they raised it from a class C to a class A.
[12:51.680 --> 12:57.520]  So six months later, all of a sudden, it becomes a class A because you had the goal to fight
[12:57.520 --> 13:07.280]  it, and then they got an invoice from someone from the Christian Academy paying someone to
[13:07.280 --> 13:12.640]  repair the damage to the dirt on their dirt track.
[13:12.640 --> 13:18.880]  I'm kind of betting that's contrived, and a good chance, if rather than the guy who
[13:18.880 --> 13:27.360]  wrote the invoice, you request a copy of the invoice and the check paying the invoice from
[13:27.360 --> 13:30.400]  the Christian Academy under discovery.
[13:30.400 --> 13:32.400]  Oh, yeah.
[13:32.400 --> 13:40.240]  They didn't have anything to do with this, they're going to get real unhappy.
[13:40.240 --> 13:41.240]  Right.
[13:41.240 --> 13:42.240]  Out of court.
[13:42.240 --> 13:47.760]  This is just from the political side.
[13:47.760 --> 13:49.080]  Right.
[13:49.080 --> 13:58.240]  So you might send a written request to the Christian Academy first, requesting a copy
[13:58.240 --> 14:07.480]  of the invoice and a copy of the check or whatever method they use to pay this invoice.
[14:07.480 --> 14:16.400]  And if you're lucky, you'll get a call back from them saying, what are you talking about?
[14:16.400 --> 14:21.280]  And if that's the case, then you got them, and then you tell them you're talking about
[14:21.280 --> 14:22.280]  aggravated perjury.
[14:22.280 --> 14:26.400]  And then first and ask them for a copy of the check.
[14:26.400 --> 14:27.400]  Yeah.
[14:27.400 --> 14:28.400]  Okay.
[14:28.400 --> 14:29.400]  Okay.
[14:29.400 --> 14:33.640]  Now, if this is a bogus invoice, there's not going to be a check.
[14:33.640 --> 14:34.640]  I'm sorry?
[14:34.640 --> 14:35.640]  I'm sorry.
[14:35.640 --> 14:40.440]  I said, if this is a bogus invoice, there's not going to be a check.
[14:40.440 --> 14:41.440]  Right.
[14:41.440 --> 14:42.440]  All right.
[14:42.440 --> 14:44.920]  I have a quick question.
[14:44.920 --> 14:50.520]  So this invoice is dated 10 days after I was out there, and then they raise it six months
[14:50.520 --> 14:58.240]  later to an A. And I'm sure they have an excuse for this, but do you think it's possible
[14:58.240 --> 14:59.240]  at all?
[14:59.240 --> 15:02.880]  They could say, well, you know, it's the administrative procedure, you know, just took
[15:02.880 --> 15:10.880]  that long to raise it to an A. I mean, there's really nothing that they can, there's really
[15:10.880 --> 15:15.160]  nothing that substantiates that, is there, I mean, six months later?
[15:15.160 --> 15:16.160]  Yeah.
[15:16.160 --> 15:23.160]  That's, this sounds bogus, and it's likely to sound bogus to a jury.
[15:23.160 --> 15:33.000]  But good chance, if it is bogus, and it almost certainly is, then the Christian Academy that
[15:33.000 --> 15:39.040]  owned the property probably has nothing to do with this, because they're not going to
[15:39.040 --> 15:44.320]  care if you fight a traffic citation, I mean, a classy misdemeanor citation.
[15:44.320 --> 15:48.320]  They don't have any, they don't have a dog in that hunt.
[15:48.320 --> 15:53.280]  They didn't file a suit against you, so, you know, they didn't care.
[15:53.280 --> 15:58.040]  The only one who cared was prosecutor, and then all of a sudden this invoice magically
[15:58.040 --> 16:01.040]  appears.
[16:01.040 --> 16:05.800]  It doesn't sound like these guys are smart enough to figure out that you might go to
[16:05.800 --> 16:10.960]  the Christian Academy and blame them for this.
[16:10.960 --> 16:15.320]  Perfect one to blame is the one that's absolutely innocent, because they're going to rail in
[16:15.320 --> 16:18.480]  a righteous indignation.
[16:18.480 --> 16:25.280]  Okay, okay, do you have anything else because we're about to go to break?
[16:25.280 --> 16:26.880]  No, that's good.
[16:26.880 --> 16:31.320]  I appreciate your time, Randy, I'll get on that with the Academy.
[16:31.320 --> 16:33.600]  Okay, thank you, Rick.
[16:33.600 --> 16:40.720]  This is Randy Kelton, rule of law radio on this Friday, the 11th day of May, 2018, and
[16:40.720 --> 16:42.520]  we do have our fundraiser going.
[16:42.520 --> 16:47.920]  For some reason last night I couldn't bring fundraiser out of my mouth, but we have our
[16:47.920 --> 16:48.920]  fundraiser going.
[16:48.920 --> 16:54.880]  We're going to have another AR-15 up to auction this year, so go to Logos Radio Network and
[16:54.880 --> 17:03.960]  check out the fundraiser and the products we have to sell, and we'll be right back.
[17:03.960 --> 17:10.320]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway, sponsored by Central Texas
[17:10.320 --> 17:11.320]  GunWorks.
[17:11.320 --> 17:15.440]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:15.440 --> 17:18.440]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:18.440 --> 17:25.680]  From Central Texas GunWorks, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[17:25.680 --> 17:28.480]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:28.480 --> 17:34.560]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:34.560 --> 17:38.440]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:38.440 --> 17:42.960]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:42.960 --> 17:47.560]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can
[17:47.560 --> 17:52.080]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[17:52.080 --> 17:55.280]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:55.280 --> 18:00.720]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.720 --> 18:06.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:06.000 --> 18:09.480]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meara's proven method.
[18:09.480 --> 18:13.840]  Michael Meara says won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.840 --> 18:14.840]  can win too.
[18:14.840 --> 18:19.640]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.640 --> 18:25.440]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.440 --> 18:30.040]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:30.040 --> 18:34.240]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.240 --> 18:39.360]  The Michael Meara's proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.360 --> 18:41.520]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.520 --> 18:47.040]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meara spanner
[18:47.040 --> 18:49.960]  or email Michael Meara's at yahoo.com.
[18:49.960 --> 18:59.560]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.560 --> 19:16.920]  in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail,
[19:16.920 --> 19:33.440]  or court summons, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go
[19:33.440 --> 19:34.440]  away.
[19:34.440 --> 19:47.760]  Good evening Randy, how are you doing?
[19:47.760 --> 20:06.560]  Let's see what you could tell me about the fiduciary duty of the court.
[20:06.560 --> 20:24.080]  The judge had a fiduciary duty to the people and with a fiduciary duty, you have a duty
[20:24.080 --> 20:27.400]  of disclosure.
[20:27.400 --> 20:39.600]  The judges are infamous for not disclosing just about anything unless they have to.
[20:39.600 --> 20:49.800]  They like to pull the, well, I can't give you legal advice routine, which is one thing
[20:49.800 --> 20:57.320]  to tell someone what they should do, but it's another thing to tell someone what their options
[20:57.320 --> 20:58.320]  are.
[20:58.320 --> 21:07.480]  But anyway, that fiduciary duty of the court, I would think that would obligate the judge
[21:07.480 --> 21:13.320]  to disclose whatever information you ask him to disclose.
[21:13.320 --> 21:21.480]  It is common for judges to tell both parties what's wrong with their pleadings and what
[21:21.480 --> 21:24.480]  they need to do to fix their pleadings.
[21:24.480 --> 21:27.560]  That's legal advice.
[21:27.560 --> 21:34.080]  So when the judge says, I can't give you legal advice, your question, the question is, why
[21:34.080 --> 21:36.160]  not?
[21:36.160 --> 21:42.720]  What prevents you from giving me legal advice?
[21:42.720 --> 21:46.000]  I haven't seen anything to prevent the judge from giving legal advice.
[21:46.000 --> 21:52.960]  Now, I've seen something that prevents me from giving legal advice, well, not exactly.
[21:52.960 --> 21:58.080]  Prevents me from holding myself out as a lawyer and representing someone in court, but I don't
[21:58.080 --> 22:01.120]  see anything preventing me from giving legal advice.
[22:01.120 --> 22:05.480]  There is something preventing clerks from giving legal advice, but that doesn't apply
[22:05.480 --> 22:06.480]  to judges.
[22:06.480 --> 22:18.480]  Okay, back to your original statement, fiduciary duty.
[22:18.480 --> 22:30.880]  So my question is, what does fiduciary mean in this context?
[22:30.880 --> 22:32.960]  That was a long silence.
[22:32.960 --> 22:35.760]  We need to look that up.
[22:35.760 --> 22:44.280]  If we can't define the terms, then we really don't know what they're talking about.
[22:44.280 --> 22:51.000]  I'm trying to imagine what the nature of a fiduciary duty the judge would have to me
[22:51.000 --> 22:55.880]  other than a duty to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence and
[22:55.880 --> 22:59.520]  apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[22:59.520 --> 23:11.280]  That's a duty that he has, but fiduciary duty, that I'm not sure about.
[23:11.280 --> 23:14.960]  What does that mean?
[23:14.960 --> 23:24.560]  Usually the fiduciary has to look out for the beneficiary, look out for the best interest
[23:24.560 --> 23:30.440]  of the beneficiary, and in the corporate setting, which a lot of people would argue
[23:30.440 --> 23:34.440]  that the courtroom is a corporate setting.
[23:34.440 --> 23:35.440]  They'll argue it's a corporation.
[23:35.440 --> 23:42.200]  I never have found any substance to that, but whether it's a corporation or not, in
[23:42.200 --> 23:49.120]  a criminal prosecution, there's no contract.
[23:49.120 --> 23:59.960]  There's nothing to have it for him to be a fiduciary for other than his duty to do process
[23:59.960 --> 24:04.080]  that I can imagine.
[24:04.080 --> 24:08.800]  Have you looked up the term fiduciary?
[24:08.800 --> 24:17.360]  I have looked up fiduciary, and there have been some people who have written on the fiduciary
[24:17.360 --> 24:27.360]  duties, and I haven't read any depth on that, but it would just seem that as an elected
[24:27.360 --> 24:29.440]  official, any elected official...
[24:29.440 --> 24:31.600]  Okay, wait, wait, hold on.
[24:31.600 --> 24:33.600] ...for the public.
[24:33.600 --> 24:40.760]  Fiduciary duty, a legal obligation of one party to act in the best interest of another.
[24:40.760 --> 24:49.280]  The obligated party is typically a fiduciary that is someone entrusted with the care of
[24:49.280 --> 24:56.000]  money or property, also called fiduciary obligation.
[24:56.000 --> 25:07.160]  I'm sure there's a way to imagine that that would apply to a judge in a trial, but fiduciary
[25:07.160 --> 25:12.320]  as is defined here is not clear enough for that to make sense.
[25:12.320 --> 25:16.280]  A fiduciary duty is the highest standard of care.
[25:16.280 --> 25:22.320]  The person who has a fiduciary duty is called the fiduciary, and the person to whom he
[25:22.320 --> 25:28.520]  owes a duty is typically referred to as the principal or the beneficiary.
[25:28.520 --> 25:34.480]  If an individual breaches the fiduciary duties, he or she would need to account for the ill-gotten
[25:34.480 --> 25:37.480]  profit.
[25:37.480 --> 25:40.640]  It's not clear enough.
[25:40.640 --> 25:50.320]  I could make up stuff that sounded like it fit that definition, but when you're dealing
[25:50.320 --> 25:57.320]  with law, it's too vague and inconclusive, so I really don't know what that means yet.
[25:57.320 --> 26:08.480]  Well, one of the things that I was trying to get at was that there are so many times
[26:08.480 --> 26:16.800]  we hear stories of people going into court and they're asking the judge the cause and
[26:16.800 --> 26:27.800]  nature of the situation is asking for help, information from the judge, and the courts
[26:27.800 --> 26:37.160]  are evasive, purposely being confusing and obfuscating the true nature of what's going
[26:37.160 --> 26:38.160]  on.
[26:38.160 --> 26:47.280]  And I think just that violates their fiduciary duty to both parties in the court to have
[26:47.280 --> 26:52.160]  a fair just hearing.
[26:52.160 --> 27:02.920]  And he must not only provide a fair hearing, he must provide the appearance of a fair hearing.
[27:02.920 --> 27:12.800]  So at the very least, that would tend to deny the appearance of a fair hearing.
[27:12.800 --> 27:14.640]  I agree.
[27:14.640 --> 27:25.760]  So move to disqualify for breach of fiduciary duties, that would be an interesting move.
[27:25.760 --> 27:28.000]  Here's the court case.
[27:28.000 --> 27:36.480]  It was a Supreme Court case, 1987, McNally versus U.S., and it says a public official
[27:36.480 --> 27:43.000]  is a fiduciary toward the public, including, in the case of a judge, the litigants who
[27:43.000 --> 27:45.320]  appear before him.
[27:45.320 --> 27:53.360]  And if he deliberately conceals material information from them, he is guilty of fraud.
[27:53.360 --> 27:54.360]  Interesting.
[27:54.360 --> 27:58.080]  How's that?
[27:58.080 --> 28:04.000]  Can you send me a link to that case?
[28:04.000 --> 28:05.720]  Make sure I get the right one.
[28:05.720 --> 28:18.080]  Yes, it's McNally versus U.S., for any of the listeners, 483 U.S. 350 comma 371 to 372.
[28:18.080 --> 28:30.080]  It's a 1987 case, and it's quoting U.S. versus Holzer, H-O-L-V-E-R, that's 816 F2D 304.
[28:30.080 --> 28:39.360]  Okay, I will find this one, I'll look it up, and I have just a place it goes.
[28:39.360 --> 28:53.040]  It will coincide with Jocelyn v. Chambers, a trial court has no discretion in determining
[28:53.040 --> 28:59.520]  what the law is or applying the law to the facts, thus a clear failure by the trial court
[28:59.520 --> 29:06.400]  to analyze or apply the law correctly will constitute an abuse of discretion and may
[29:06.400 --> 29:13.720]  result in appellate reversal by extraordinary writ.
[29:13.720 --> 29:14.720]  That's pretty clear.
[29:14.720 --> 29:22.000]  That goes to a fiduciary duty he has to both parties, and that's the one they violate
[29:22.000 --> 29:31.960]  all the time, and when they do that because of the way I read this case law, will constitute
[29:31.960 --> 29:40.760]  an abuse of discretion, abuse of discretion, deny where the abuse denies a citizen full
[29:40.760 --> 29:43.400]  free access to enjoyment, right?
[29:43.400 --> 29:48.640]  That's crime in state of Texas and in the Fed.
[29:48.640 --> 29:54.440]  This is not exactly the case I was looking for, I was looking for a Packer v. Walker.
[29:54.440 --> 30:01.160]  Packer v. Walker is a little clearer on that issue, and Packer v. Walker f*****g.
[30:01.160 --> 30:03.960]  I've heard of hairspray, but how about DNA spray?
[30:03.960 --> 30:08.320]  It's a high-tech way to catch robbers, but down the road it could be abused.
[30:08.320 --> 30:12.160]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with what you need to know about
[30:12.160 --> 30:14.560]  aerosol micro dots.
[30:14.560 --> 30:16.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.160 --> 30:20.560]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[30:20.560 --> 30:24.520]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:24.520 --> 30:30.120]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.120 --> 30:31.120]  Privacy.
[30:31.120 --> 30:32.320]  That's what you're hanging on to.
[30:32.320 --> 30:36.640]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:36.640 --> 30:40.160]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.160 --> 30:43.920]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.920 --> 30:48.200]  Exploding ink can cover thieves in a profusion of purple, but nowadays they need to look
[30:48.200 --> 30:51.840]  out for spray on polka dots the size of pinheads too.
[30:51.840 --> 30:56.840]  The select-a-mark security system uses DNA spray on robbers as they make a getaway.
[30:56.840 --> 31:01.480]  The coating glows under ultraviolet light for weeks, and police can identify the crime
[31:01.480 --> 31:05.000]  scene because the spray contains unique micro dots.
[31:05.000 --> 31:09.400]  While it's currently used to nab criminals, the spray could be turned to other purposes.
[31:09.400 --> 31:14.560]  Imagine attending a political rally and later glowing under ultraviolet light at the airport.
[31:14.560 --> 31:17.360]  It could give a whole new meaning to the no-fly list.
[31:17.360 --> 31:20.560]  Maybe we should all be wary of DNA spray.
[31:20.560 --> 31:22.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht.
[31:22.000 --> 31:29.000]  For more news and information, at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.000 --> 31:59.000]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you.
[32:22.000 --> 32:29.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht.
[32:52.000 --> 32:59.000]  Thanks for watching.
[33:22.000 --> 33:29.000]  Okay, we are back.
[33:29.000 --> 33:35.000]  Randy Kelton with Law Radio, and I've been corrected.
[33:35.000 --> 33:39.880]  It is not Packer v. Walker, it's Walker v. Packer.
[33:39.880 --> 33:43.800]  My producer keeps correcting me when I make these mistakes.
[33:43.800 --> 33:47.000]  That's why I have such a good producer.
[33:47.000 --> 33:53.000]  Anyway, I kind of fell off the cliff there, Sonny.
[33:53.000 --> 33:55.000]  Where were we?
[33:55.000 --> 34:03.000]  Well, one of the things in this case, when the Supreme Court case, when it talks about
[34:03.000 --> 34:10.000]  the public official being a fiduciary, it says that he deliberately conceals material information.
[34:10.000 --> 34:19.000]  And material information from what I looked up, material information, and what's important to me.
[34:19.000 --> 34:23.000]  Wait a minute, that brings up a question.
[34:23.000 --> 34:32.000]  What duty, what material information would the judge have?
[34:32.000 --> 34:36.000]  Well, for example, what's the jurisdiction of the court?
[34:36.000 --> 34:51.000]  Where can I find the rules for proceeding in statutory criminal jurisdiction?
[34:51.000 --> 34:57.000]  Okay, well, the court's going to say, you got to do that.
[34:57.000 --> 35:01.000]  That looking up the law is not the place of the judge.
[35:01.000 --> 35:07.000]  It is the duty of the judge to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[35:07.000 --> 35:12.000]  then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[35:12.000 --> 35:17.000]  It's not his place to look up the law.
[35:17.000 --> 35:22.000]  You have to bring it to him.
[35:22.000 --> 35:27.000]  So you couldn't ask him that question.
[35:27.000 --> 35:38.000]  I think that someone might could make that case early on when they're trying to just find out, for example,
[35:38.000 --> 35:41.000]  what the capacity that the judge is serving in.
[35:41.000 --> 35:50.000]  You have different hearings where in one hearing, the judge may be acting as simply a referee.
[35:50.000 --> 35:57.000]  In another setting, the judge may be acting in a judicial capacity.
[35:57.000 --> 36:04.000]  So the judge never discloses what capacity he's operating under,
[36:04.000 --> 36:10.000]  and so it confuses to the guy who's just in there representing himself.
[36:10.000 --> 36:16.000]  Okay, well, I'm sitting here thinking about how does the court case work?
[36:16.000 --> 36:28.000]  And your original statement about when you request the nature and cause of the charges against you,
[36:28.000 --> 36:30.000]  that's not the place of the prosecutor.
[36:30.000 --> 36:33.000]  That's not the responsibility of the prosecutor.
[36:33.000 --> 36:35.000]  That's the responsibility of the judge.
[36:35.000 --> 36:39.000]  The judge is one that's directing you to stay in an answer.
[36:39.000 --> 36:50.000]  And he's the one that would have a duty to give you constitutional information as to the nature and cause.
[36:50.000 --> 36:53.000]  So that would go to a fiduciary duty.
[36:53.000 --> 37:00.000]  Another one I can think of is when the judge renders a ruling.
[37:00.000 --> 37:08.000]  You have a right to know on what facts and what law he based that ruling.
[37:08.000 --> 37:15.000]  We just requested findings of facts and conclusions of law from a judge here in Texas, and he just ignored it.
[37:15.000 --> 37:27.000]  Well, fiduciary duty goes to that issue because he's required by statute to provide findings of facts and conclusions of law,
[37:27.000 --> 37:35.000]  and we file criminal charges against him for not doing it.
[37:35.000 --> 37:38.000]  That would be a place.
[37:38.000 --> 37:41.000]  Where else?
[37:41.000 --> 37:55.000]  Well, the fiduciary duty requires a duty to disclose material information, but there's also a duty of loyalty.
[37:55.000 --> 37:56.000]  No, wait a minute.
[37:56.000 --> 38:00.000]  Okay, disclose material information.
[38:00.000 --> 38:12.000]  It's difficult because it's not the judge's place to adjudicate one side or the other.
[38:12.000 --> 38:18.000]  The judge can only rule on what's brought to him.
[38:18.000 --> 38:36.000]  For him to disclose material information, how would he have material information unless it went to behaviors that went on outside the presence of one of the litigants that one of the litigants had no knowledge of.
[38:36.000 --> 38:44.000]  For instance, an ex parte communication with one of the litigants.
[38:44.000 --> 38:52.000]  There he would have a fiduciary duty to disclose.
[38:52.000 --> 38:54.000]  Does that make sense?
[38:54.000 --> 39:00.000]  Yeah, I think it's definitely a topic that needs more study.
[39:00.000 --> 39:02.000]  Yeah, it does.
[39:02.000 --> 39:06.000]  It's a good topic for setting up the judge.
[39:06.000 --> 39:07.000]  I agree.
[39:07.000 --> 39:13.000]  When I'm in the courtroom, everything's about setting up the judge so I can sting him.
[39:13.000 --> 39:25.000]  And if I can figure out a fiduciary duty he has that he may not even know about, I can call him on that fiduciary duty and when he fails on it, then I get to sting him.
[39:25.000 --> 39:30.000]  So yeah, it's definitely something we need to do some more research on.
[39:30.000 --> 39:48.000]  He also has a duty to dialogue and I'm scanning through about a 40 page.
[39:48.000 --> 39:54.000]  I've got the case that you might go down to the order or to the decision.
[39:54.000 --> 40:07.000]  This is entitled A Fiduciary Theory of Judging by Ethan Leib and David Pone.
[40:07.000 --> 40:12.000]  And it goes into quite a bit.
[40:12.000 --> 40:16.000]  The theory of judging.
[40:16.000 --> 40:21.000]  Okay, let me read a section here from the case.
[40:21.000 --> 40:24.000]  McNally, V. U.S.
[40:24.000 --> 40:31.000]  The jury convicted petitioners on both the mail fraud and the Spears Accounts Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions.
[40:31.000 --> 40:50.000]  In affirming the substantive mail fraud conviction, the court relied upon a line of decisions from the Court of Appeals holding that the mail fraud statute prescribes schemes to defraud citizens of their intangible rights to honest and impartial government.
[40:50.000 --> 41:02.000]  In these cases, a public official owes a fiduciary duty to the public and misuse of his office for private gain is a fraud.
[41:02.000 --> 41:13.000]  Also, an individual without formal office may be held to a public fiduciary if others rely on him because of a special relationship with the government.
[41:13.000 --> 41:23.000]  And he, in fact, makes governmental decisions, something like a mediator.
[41:23.000 --> 41:49.000]  The court of appeals held that Hunt was a fiduciary because he substantially participated in governmental affairs and exercised significant, if not exclusive, control over awarding the workman's compensation insurance contract to Womwell and the payments of monetary kickbacks to Seaton.
[41:49.000 --> 41:53.000]  So this sounds like a mediator.
[41:53.000 --> 41:56.000]  So a mediator in order of fiduciary duty.
[41:56.000 --> 41:59.000]  Okay, this is from the case you cited.
[41:59.000 --> 42:04.000]  McNally, the U.S. Okay, go ahead.
[42:04.000 --> 42:19.000]  I think that there are a couple of other things that Mr. Judge, there would be material information and material information just being whatever is significant and important to you.
[42:19.000 --> 42:26.000]  And so the procedure of the court would be, I would think, material information.
[42:26.000 --> 42:40.000]  Yeah, well, yeah, I would think so. When you say material information, it always, you know, when I hear material information, that is the kind of stuff that the parties are required to bring to the case.
[42:40.000 --> 42:56.000]  Everything other than that would be some court behavior, either, almost certainly court behavior that's out of the sight of the litigants.
[42:56.000 --> 43:04.000]  The only thing I can think of is some kind of contact with the court by one of the litigants that's not exclusive.
[43:04.000 --> 43:21.000]  That's not, doesn't include both parties. Otherwise, I can't imagine what information the court would have of a material nature that the litigant would not be required to know anyway.
[43:21.000 --> 43:34.000]  The only thing I can think of that the court would have was knowledge of what the rules of court or the law or the rules of evidence, things that both parties would have a duty to know anyway.
[43:34.000 --> 43:42.000]  So the only other thing is some goings on behind the scenes, essentially, exporte.
[43:42.000 --> 43:47.000]  I can't think of anything else that would seem to fall in that category.
[43:47.000 --> 44:00.000]  One of the problems that I would have is if the judge isn't deemed to know the law and the police officer isn't deemed to know the law, then how can I be deemed to know the law and their procedures and that sort of thing.
[44:00.000 --> 44:09.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:09.000 --> 44:14.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[44:18.000 --> 44:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal stealers and journalists.
[44:24.000 --> 44:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[44:27.000 --> 44:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[44:32.000 --> 44:39.000]  We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[44:39.000 --> 44:46.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept bitcoins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6440.
[44:46.000 --> 44:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[44:51.000 --> 44:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[44:54.000 --> 45:00.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[45:00.000 --> 45:15.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:34.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:56.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro-state tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[45:56.000 --> 46:14.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:14.000 --> 46:28.640]  Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Ooh Oh Oh Ooh Oh ooh ooh Ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh School 15
[46:28.640 --> 46:41.000]  Oh woah oh 2000
[46:41.000 --> 46:47.240]  a radio on our four hour info marathon and I told Deborah last night on the show that
[46:47.240 --> 46:53.960]  something was terribly wrong. I went through the whole show and did not run off the cliff
[46:53.960 --> 47:05.000]  one time. Tonight I've ran off the cliff every time except one and I let Sunny run off instead.
[47:05.000 --> 47:13.320]  So things are going right tonight. Okay Sunny, when we went out you were addressing how could
[47:13.320 --> 47:20.400]  the judge not be deemed to know the law and the police officer not be deemed to know the
[47:20.400 --> 47:30.520]  law but we're deemed to know the law. This is how it works. The judge is not authorized
[47:30.520 --> 47:37.640]  to research these case issues. It's his place to determine the facts in accordance with the
[47:37.640 --> 47:46.540]  rules of evidence and apply the law as it comes to him. And what the court say, if you are
[47:46.540 --> 47:55.660]  litigant and you have an issue before the court, the judges cannot be expected to have
[47:55.660 --> 48:05.120]  memorized the whole law library. So it's your responsibility to research your case and bring
[48:05.120 --> 48:13.400]  all the relevant law that applies to your case to the court. And it's the opposing party's
[48:13.400 --> 48:20.640]  duty to do the same for their side. Then the judge will take the law you bring him or her
[48:20.640 --> 48:28.120]  and apply them both to the facts and make a determination of which set of law most correctly
[48:28.120 --> 48:35.040]  applies to the facts. That's how it's supposed to work. And that's why they can say it's
[48:35.040 --> 48:44.240]  not the judge's place to bring the law to the court and it's not the accuser's place
[48:44.240 --> 48:49.520]  or in a criminal case it's not the officer's place to bring the law to the court. It's
[48:49.520 --> 48:56.640]  the prosecutor's place and it's the defendant's place. Does that make sense?
[48:56.640 --> 49:06.240]  It does and that's the type of material information that the judge should disclose to the man
[49:06.240 --> 49:12.600]  who's representing himself so that he would be able to actually prepare a defense for
[49:12.600 --> 49:18.360]  himself. Otherwise he's going in there without knowing the presumptions that the court carries
[49:18.360 --> 49:23.640]  and he's really being done a disservice.
[49:23.640 --> 49:33.080]  I agree and this is something that perhaps we need legislation for. Legislation of that
[49:33.080 --> 49:42.320]  nature was passed in the Fed. The federal judge and the federal clerk is required to
[49:42.320 --> 49:51.440]  give deference to prosaic litigants. To keep them from making the kinds of mistakes that
[49:51.440 --> 49:59.240]  prosaic litigants would make from not knowing the rules or the basic relevant law affecting
[49:59.240 --> 50:05.960]  their case. We do have that in the Fed. We need it in the state.
[50:05.960 --> 50:14.160]  Are you saying that, for example, in the Fed when they allow litigants to amend and correct
[50:14.160 --> 50:20.040]  their mistakes, that the states don't really allow that?
[50:20.040 --> 50:27.400]  Yeah, the states do, but in the Fed they're required to tell you when you're screwing
[50:27.400 --> 50:38.440]  up. Not when you're bringing bad law, but when you're screwing up on a basic rule of
[50:38.440 --> 50:45.000]  court or such. If you bring in a bogus filing in the state, they're going to not accept
[50:45.000 --> 50:48.880]  it and they're not going to tell you why. If you bring in a bogus filing in the Fed and
[50:48.880 --> 50:55.640]  you're a prosaic, the clerk is required to tell you what's wrong with it and why she
[50:55.640 --> 51:01.360]  won't accept it. That would be construed as legal advice, but the feds require them to
[51:01.360 --> 51:07.520]  do that for a prosaic litigant. They should have the same thing in the state.
[51:07.520 --> 51:13.480]  When the judge renders one of these technical rulings, he's required to tell you. Federal
[51:13.480 --> 51:19.680]  judges do this all the time. It's a regular practice. I've had people call in complaining
[51:19.680 --> 51:27.760]  that the judge is giving legal advice to the prosecutor. I tell them, listen real close,
[51:27.760 --> 51:32.440]  because the judge will do that for both sides. He'll say, this is your pleading. This is
[51:32.440 --> 51:37.920]  what's wrong with your pleading. This is what you need to do to correct your pleading. Then
[51:37.920 --> 51:42.800]  he'll tell the other guy, same thing. This is what's wrong with yours. This is what you
[51:42.800 --> 51:49.680]  need to do to correct it. That's reasonable, because the judge is not there to just be
[51:49.680 --> 51:58.520]  an umpire to see who can bat the hardest. The judge is there to find a fair and just
[51:58.520 --> 52:08.600]  adjudication of the case. He wants both sides to bring good pleadings to him. That's the
[52:08.600 --> 52:16.920]  only thing the judge really gets to do that's really judge-like. It's not being a referee
[52:16.920 --> 52:27.960]  in the courtroom, but taking complex fact sets and complex law and applying both sides'
[52:27.960 --> 52:36.800]  arguments in a way that renders a fair and just outcome. That's the most sophisticated
[52:36.800 --> 52:43.160]  thing that a judge can do, and that's what they like to do. They want you to bring them
[52:43.160 --> 52:50.200]  good law. They don't want to rule against you over something stupid. They want to rule
[52:50.200 --> 52:55.360]  on good law. In the Fed, they will tell you. Harman Taylor, I just talked to him on the
[52:55.360 --> 53:05.040]  phone today, what he said about the court hit him with a padded tube before. They told
[53:05.040 --> 53:11.560]  him what was wrong with his pleading. They dismissed his petition, and they told him
[53:11.560 --> 53:18.040]  exactly why they didn't dismiss his position. Harman was a lawyer, and he always treats
[53:18.040 --> 53:26.760]  the judges as if they're mentors. Pay attention to what the judge rules, because he's telling
[53:26.760 --> 53:31.640]  you what's wrong with your case. Rather than getting mad at him, if he gives you points
[53:31.640 --> 53:36.560]  and authorities, pay close attention to it, because he's telling you how to replede your
[53:36.560 --> 53:42.840]  case correctly. Now, granted, there's a lot of times when the judges are no good, rotten,
[53:42.840 --> 53:48.440]  unscrupulous, scoundrels, but not always. A lot of times we accuse them of being no
[53:48.440 --> 53:55.360]  good, rotten, unscrupulous, scoundrels. When they're really telling us what we need to
[53:55.360 --> 54:03.120]  bring them so that they can rule in our favor, then we're too upset to be listening. I sat
[54:03.120 --> 54:12.680]  as a judge in a mock trial once, and everybody should do that once. You will get a very different
[54:12.680 --> 54:20.680]  perspective. We had a guy that was a legal reform guy. He was one of us, and he'd followed
[54:20.680 --> 54:25.560]  some of this patriot mythology in the state of Pennsylvania. He was coming after him.
[54:25.560 --> 54:31.280]  Well, Pastor Massad asked me to sit as a mock judge when they picked a mock jury off the
[54:31.280 --> 54:38.800]  street who didn't know any of us. This guy's coming up and he's presenting all this patriot
[54:38.800 --> 54:45.960]  mythology stuff. I'm sitting there strumming my fingers on the desk. I'm on his side. I'm
[54:45.960 --> 54:51.640]  not a fair judge. I'm one of them. But I'm sitting as a judge, so I'm waiting for him
[54:51.640 --> 54:56.440]  to bring me something on which I couldn't render a ruling. He's bringing me a bunch
[54:56.440 --> 55:02.960]  of junk, a bunch of patriot mythology, and I finally called a recess, and he had this
[55:02.960 --> 55:11.480]  guy helping him out. I told him, if this guy gets up in front of me one more time, I ought
[55:11.480 --> 55:18.640]  to ask Danny, I ought to write you to shoot him. He's going to get you put in jail. All
[55:18.640 --> 55:23.200]  this patriot mythology has nothing to do with the facts in the law. Before this case, you've
[55:23.200 --> 55:29.320]  given me nothing I can rule in your favor with. Just a bunch of patriot philosophy.
[55:29.320 --> 55:35.080]  Give me some facts in law. Well, he didn't. The jury found against him. They had another
[55:35.080 --> 55:41.920]  mock trial. The jury found against him. He went to trial. He spent two or three years
[55:41.920 --> 55:51.080]  in prison. He never got it. He's thinking, this patriot stuff is right because it's
[55:51.080 --> 55:56.400]  right and it sounds just to me. You should listen to this and it should sway you. And
[55:56.400 --> 56:06.080]  we couldn't convince him. Bring the judge facts and law, not legal theory. That's my
[56:06.080 --> 56:19.600]  story and I'm sticking to it. So, on amending motions or trying to correct your mistakes.
[56:19.600 --> 56:31.400]  Okay. Let me speak to correcting mistakes. There are excusable errors and there are
[56:31.400 --> 56:40.280]  nuns' protonk, nuns' protonk errors, are errors that are not substantive where you
[56:40.280 --> 56:48.760]  have a misstatement in a case where you've written it wrong or sometimes you're typing
[56:48.760 --> 57:00.720]  and auto correct takes a no and turns it into a not or an and turns it into an and. It switches
[57:00.720 --> 57:08.720]  words around and sometimes that can be real unfortunate. And that's a nuns' protonk.
[57:08.720 --> 57:17.400]  You can file a motion to correct nuns' protonk and that means we are correcting technical
[57:17.400 --> 57:28.440]  errors or non-substantive errors. Now, where you make, where you fail to file a document
[57:28.440 --> 57:35.760]  or you file a document, that's the wrong copy. I once filed a working copy instead of the
[57:35.760 --> 57:42.880]  original, instead of the file copy. And that was, we argued it was an excusable error and
[57:42.880 --> 57:49.800]  we asked the court's permission to file the final copy that was substantively the same
[57:49.800 --> 57:55.960]  but didn't have the technical errors that the file copy did and he granted that and
[57:55.960 --> 58:02.400]  they'll generally grant that. So, what other kind of errors are you considering that you
[58:02.400 --> 58:04.400]  should be able to correct?
[58:04.400 --> 58:17.920]  Well, in my case, the judge lost his composure at a hearing when both myself and the prosecutor
[58:17.920 --> 58:27.520]  were going to ask for a continuance so that I could file a more definite motion for a new
[58:27.520 --> 58:32.080]  trial. I wouldn't sign the court order.
[58:32.080 --> 58:38.600]  Okay, hold on, hold on, about to go to break. Randy Kelsen, Ruth of La Radio, a call in
[58:38.600 --> 58:50.360]  number 512-646-1984, we'll be right back. And I didn't run off the cliff that time.
[58:50.360 --> 58:55.360]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America
[58:55.360 --> 59:01.000]  is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:05.360]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.360 --> 59:09.960]  today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.960 --> 59:13.480]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.480 --> 59:18.760]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter
[59:18.760 --> 59:24.360]  by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.360 --> 59:30.000]  growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery
[59:30.000 --> 59:36.600]  version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at
[59:36.600 --> 01:00:02.600]  888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:02.600 --> 01:00:07.760]  The following newsflash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[01:00:07.760 --> 01:00:15.480]  bulletins for the commodity market, today's history, news updates and the inside scoop
[01:00:15.480 --> 01:00:26.080]  into the tides of the alternative. Markets for the 11th of April, 2018, closed
[01:00:26.080 --> 01:00:35.240]  gold at $1,353.22 an ounce, silver $16.68 an ounce, Texas crude $65.51 a barrel, bitcoins
[01:00:35.240 --> 01:00:44.920]  at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80, bitcoin cash at $652.90, and finally light coins
[01:00:44.920 --> 01:00:58.920]  at $114.34 a crypto coin. Today in history, the year 1968, President
[01:00:58.920 --> 01:01:04.160]  Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which prohibited private businesses
[01:01:04.160 --> 01:01:09.280]  from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It also prohibited
[01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:13.600]  unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in public
[01:01:13.600 --> 01:01:24.000]  schools, in employment and public accommodations for places of business, today in history.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:28.040]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:01:28.040 --> 01:01:32.320]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:01:32.320 --> 01:01:36.760]  is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:01:36.760 --> 01:01:41.520]  United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:01:41.520 --> 01:01:46.360]  evidence as of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows
[01:01:46.360 --> 01:01:50.440]  to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will
[01:01:50.440 --> 01:01:55.040]  be coming in nice and new and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners
[01:01:55.040 --> 01:01:59.480]  with a gas-killing animal who kills its people and enjoys it. Many in the West, including
[01:01:59.480 --> 01:02:04.560]  President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted
[01:02:04.560 --> 01:02:09.680]  by Assad and his forces. Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since
[01:02:09.680 --> 01:02:13.960]  yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the sign
[01:02:13.960 --> 01:02:18.680]  of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's
[01:02:18.680 --> 01:02:22.860]  seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and
[01:02:22.860 --> 01:02:27.760]  anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with
[01:02:27.760 --> 01:02:32.560]  ISIS being one of the more notorious winner groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:32.560 --> 01:02:37.880]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakhova posted on Facebook
[01:02:37.880 --> 01:02:42.240]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[01:02:42.240 --> 01:02:47.160]  has been fighting terrorists. Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[01:02:47.160 --> 01:02:50.880]  strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:02:50.880 --> 01:02:59.880]  This was quick roadie with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:02:59.880 --> 01:03:09.880]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:09.880 --> 01:03:18.880]  I read his book and it says he cares for the unsightly.
[01:03:18.880 --> 01:03:26.880]  These warmongers come by left or right.
[01:03:26.880 --> 01:03:32.880]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton from Rula's Law Radio and we're talking to Sonny and
[01:03:32.880 --> 01:03:39.880]  Georgia, and I actually did not run off the cliff one time.
[01:03:39.880 --> 01:03:40.880]  Okay.
[01:03:40.880 --> 01:03:42.880]  That's good.
[01:03:42.880 --> 01:03:55.480]  So, I was in this hearing, the judge lost his composure when the prosecution was telling
[01:03:55.480 --> 01:04:03.920]  the judge all we're here today is to continue this to a later time so that I could file
[01:04:03.920 --> 01:04:11.480]  a more definite motion for a new trial.
[01:04:11.480 --> 01:04:22.080]  And since I felt like they were trying to trick me into signing this agreement, this
[01:04:22.080 --> 01:04:29.080]  is a scheduling order, and my position is, okay, why do I need to sign?
[01:04:29.080 --> 01:04:34.080]  Why does the judge need my permission to make an order?
[01:04:34.080 --> 01:04:42.080]  He could order, okay, in 30 days we're going to have this hearing and you'd better be ready.
[01:04:42.080 --> 01:04:45.080]  He doesn't need my signature.
[01:04:45.080 --> 01:04:50.080]  I feel like they're just trying to get me to contract with them so that they can establish
[01:04:50.080 --> 01:04:52.080]  jurisdiction.
[01:04:52.080 --> 01:04:58.080]  I could be wrong on that, but when I wouldn't sign, he just lost it and he just said, well,
[01:04:58.080 --> 01:05:00.080]  I'm not signing it anyway.
[01:05:00.080 --> 01:05:10.080]  And then he just forced me to present whatever I had, and so I just had to wing it from there.
[01:05:10.080 --> 01:05:23.080]  So as a result of that, it led me in preparing a more definite motion that I'm going to resubmit.
[01:05:23.080 --> 01:05:31.080]  And I found a case which talks about, at least I think it talks about, when you file a motion,
[01:05:31.080 --> 01:05:35.080]  it doesn't matter what the title of the motion is.
[01:05:35.080 --> 01:05:39.080]  The court has to look at the substance of what's in there.
[01:05:39.080 --> 01:05:46.080]  They actually have to read it and not just go by the title on someone who's pro se.
[01:05:46.080 --> 01:05:49.080]  Yes, let me tell you a little story on that.
[01:05:49.080 --> 01:05:53.080]  I'm in court with Robert Fox.
[01:05:53.080 --> 01:05:56.080]  Robert Fox has about four or five motions.
[01:05:56.080 --> 01:05:59.080]  He's filed with the court and I've got four motions.
[01:05:59.080 --> 01:06:02.080]  I've filed, I wrote up for him and he filed.
[01:06:02.080 --> 01:06:04.080]  He's got about eight motions.
[01:06:04.080 --> 01:06:11.080]  The judge and the prosecutor are going through these motions and they're trying to figure out what to call them.
[01:06:11.080 --> 01:06:15.080]  Because Robert Fox used to kind of ramble around a lot.
[01:06:15.080 --> 01:06:20.080]  And they said, oh, well, we'll call this one a motion to dismiss.
[01:06:20.080 --> 01:06:24.080]  And they were trying to figure out what to call them.
[01:06:24.080 --> 01:06:33.080]  And it was on this very issue because Robert's titles on his motions were sometimes divisive.
[01:06:33.080 --> 01:06:40.080]  And they got to mine and they said, oh, whoa, whoa, whoa, we need to sort of have an issue here on these.
[01:06:40.080 --> 01:06:43.080]  There was no questions as to what they were for.
[01:06:43.080 --> 01:06:52.080]  So the point of that was these motions, the title did not indicate what the motion was really about.
[01:06:52.080 --> 01:06:54.080]  And you are absolutely right.
[01:06:54.080 --> 01:06:56.080]  The case law is very clear.
[01:06:56.080 --> 01:07:02.080]  It does not make any difference what the title of the motion is.
[01:07:02.080 --> 01:07:07.080]  The motion is what it is based on the substance.
[01:07:07.080 --> 01:07:12.080]  So they have to determine the substance of the motion to decide what it actually is.
[01:07:12.080 --> 01:07:14.080]  Go ahead.
[01:07:14.080 --> 01:07:28.080]  So what that, in this particular case, it says in the event that a criminal defendant labels a pleading as a motion and arrest of judgment.
[01:07:28.080 --> 01:07:30.080]  That was the context here.
[01:07:30.080 --> 01:07:41.080]  But in substance, some other type of motion, the appealability of the trial court's ruling on the motion will turn on the substance of the motion.
[01:07:41.080 --> 01:07:43.080]  And so...
[01:07:43.080 --> 01:07:45.080]  Okay, hold on.
[01:07:45.080 --> 01:07:49.080]  Will you send me a citation to that case?
[01:07:49.080 --> 01:07:51.080]  Yes.
[01:07:51.080 --> 01:08:00.080]  I've handled that for a long time, and I've seen it in case law, but I didn't have it written down, so I didn't have the exact law to give them.
[01:08:00.080 --> 01:08:05.080]  And telling them that violated my rule, never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[01:08:05.080 --> 01:08:09.080]  So that will allow me to have the actual case law.
[01:08:09.080 --> 01:08:20.080]  Yes, it's lay LAY versus state 289 SE2D141.
[01:08:20.080 --> 01:08:34.080]  And it was actually holding that the appealability of an order is determined not by its form, the name, given to it by the trial court, but rather its substance and effect.
[01:08:34.080 --> 01:08:40.080]  And it was actually referring to a Georgia case, Johnson versus a RLI.
[01:08:40.080 --> 01:08:45.080]  Okay, top title does not control.
[01:08:45.080 --> 01:09:08.080]  Right, and if that holds true, then I should be able to have the judge set aside his denial of my motion for new trial ruling and go back and rule on the motion and arrest of judgment first.
[01:09:08.080 --> 01:09:21.080]  Because I think that I could make the case that I brought up the element for the substance, for a motion and arrest of judgment, as opposed to my motion for new trial.
[01:09:21.080 --> 01:09:28.080]  And that has to be heard first before your motion for a new trial.
[01:09:28.080 --> 01:09:40.080]  Perfect, perfect. And you might file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge for not doing that himself.
[01:09:40.080 --> 01:09:52.080]  Oh, yeah, yeah. Oh, what he did, he actually ruled on this before the court reporter prepared the transcript.
[01:09:52.080 --> 01:09:58.080]  Wait a minute. Before, hold on. That didn't make sense.
[01:09:58.080 --> 01:10:05.080]  Okay, before the court reporter prepared the transcript, they don't always prepare a transcript.
[01:10:05.080 --> 01:10:15.080]  Well, in Georgia, in criminal proceedings, the court reporter prepares a transcript for every hearing.
[01:10:15.080 --> 01:10:22.080]  So the judge ruled on this before he had the transcript from the court reporter.
[01:10:22.080 --> 01:10:28.080]  Is there anything in law to prevent him from doing that?
[01:10:28.080 --> 01:10:33.080]  Because the reason I say that is that's unusual, and I've heard that before.
[01:10:33.080 --> 01:10:37.080]  In most cases, the judge rules on what goes on in the courtroom.
[01:10:37.080 --> 01:10:41.080]  He doesn't have to wait for a transcript to go back and read the transcript.
[01:10:41.080 --> 01:10:53.080]  So that's unusual for Georgia. Is there something that requires him to hold, withhold his ruling until there's a transcript?
[01:10:53.080 --> 01:11:04.080]  That I don't know, but it would just make sense, common sense to me that, okay, if I didn't remember exactly what I said, how can he?
[01:11:04.080 --> 01:11:14.080]  Well, see, that has to be careful in how you make your claims, because he may. He may remember accurately.
[01:11:14.080 --> 01:11:19.080]  And at the moment, he had all the information in front of him.
[01:11:19.080 --> 01:11:30.080]  So before I raise that issue, I would want to make sure that there was a prohibition that prevented him from rendering the ruling until he got a transcript.
[01:11:30.080 --> 01:11:35.080]  And I'm going to bet there's not.
[01:11:35.080 --> 01:11:45.080]  It's unreasonable to tell a judge when he's sitting in front of both of the litigants that he can't render a ruling.
[01:11:45.080 --> 01:11:53.080]  Well, see, the thing about it is that the prosecution offered not one word in rebuttal to everything that I said.
[01:11:53.080 --> 01:11:55.080]  So my motion was basically...
[01:11:55.080 --> 01:12:02.080]  Okay, hold on. Step back one. Did you file the motion timely?
[01:12:02.080 --> 01:12:04.080]  Yes.
[01:12:04.080 --> 01:12:09.080]  Did the prosecution respond to the motion, oppose the motion?
[01:12:09.080 --> 01:12:12.080]  Not in writing, no.
[01:12:12.080 --> 01:12:19.080]  Okay. If you did not respond in writing, let me go back here.
[01:12:19.080 --> 01:12:46.080]  And I remember where I've got this one, where a case where accusations are made and they're not opposed by opposing counsel, that amounts to formal judicial admission.
[01:12:46.080 --> 01:13:00.080]  So we've got more to, if it's not the place of the judge, to judge can't just rule on a rule whatever he wants to.
[01:13:00.080 --> 01:13:16.080]  I'm trying to find a cure. If the prosecution didn't answer, then everything that you claimed must be accepted as judicial admission.
[01:13:16.080 --> 01:13:31.080]  Let me go on up here. I'm in a case that will have it. That was an important find when I come across that. collateral estoppel.
[01:13:31.080 --> 01:13:57.080]  So the prosecution will say he has no duty to respond to your pleadings. That's true.
[01:13:57.080 --> 01:14:04.080]  But if he doesn't, then he has a duty to stand mute in the courtroom.
[01:14:04.080 --> 01:14:08.080]  And the court must accept all your assertions as true.
[01:14:08.080 --> 01:14:21.080]  And if your assertions were true, then the law would command a particular ruling the judge must give it.
[01:14:21.080 --> 01:14:36.080]  So if the judge allowed the prosecutor to argue an issue that he had not filed a opposition to, then you filed judicial conduct complaint against the judge.
[01:14:36.080 --> 01:14:39.080]  Is there a court case?
[01:14:39.080 --> 01:14:57.080]  It is. This one's Texas, so you have to do a search to find, you do Houston First American Savings v. Musak, M-U-S-I-C-K, 650 Southwest 2D, 764.
[01:14:57.080 --> 01:15:09.080]  You run that with a space Georgia, and you see if you can find a Georgia case that references this case. That's generally how I port them from one state to another.
[01:15:09.080 --> 01:15:18.080]  Or just put in assertions of fact not pledging the alternative in the life pleadings of a party are regarded as a formal judicial admissions.
[01:15:18.080 --> 01:15:23.080]  Send me an email. Ask for it. I'll send this to you.
[01:15:23.080 --> 01:15:30.080]  Send me an email and in the subject line ask for collateral estoppel.
[01:15:30.080 --> 01:15:31.080]  Okay.
[01:15:31.080 --> 01:15:34.080]  And I'll send these cases to you.
[01:15:34.080 --> 01:15:48.080]  That sounds really good, and that was sort of the hunch that I had that I was just wondering how in the world can the judge keep ruling against me when the prosecution doesn't oppose any of my motions?
[01:15:48.080 --> 01:15:56.080]  That's an issue that we've been having, and that's why I went to work on this and tripped across this case law.
[01:15:56.080 --> 01:16:07.080]  So this was the remedy to that problem. Once I found this, now I filed these documents in order to get them not to respond to them.
[01:16:07.080 --> 01:16:16.080]  Too lengthy, too convoluted, too big a pain in the rear to read through the whole thing and try to figure it out, so they just blow it off.
[01:16:16.080 --> 01:16:24.080]  The prosecutor doesn't bother to respond to it, and the judge just wheels against you out of hand.
[01:16:24.080 --> 01:16:28.080]  I charge him criminally with official oppression.
[01:16:28.080 --> 01:16:31.080]  So we set him up for it.
[01:16:31.080 --> 01:16:33.080]  I got the case law to support it.
[01:16:33.080 --> 01:16:34.080]  Hang on.
[01:16:34.080 --> 01:16:49.080]  We're about to go to break. Randy Kelton, we have our radio, our call in number 512-646-1984, and just so my producer can tell you where I didn't run off the cliff twice today.
[01:16:49.080 --> 01:16:51.080]  I think that's a record.
[01:16:51.080 --> 01:16:54.080]  Hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:16:54.080 --> 01:16:56.080]  Okay.
[01:17:25.080 --> 01:17:28.080]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:28.080 --> 01:17:34.080]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:34.080 --> 01:17:38.080]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:38.080 --> 01:17:42.080]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:42.080 --> 01:17:52.080]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:17:52.080 --> 01:17:55.080]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.080 --> 01:18:00.080]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.080 --> 01:18:02.080]  I love Logos.
[01:18:02.080 --> 01:18:05.080]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:05.080 --> 01:18:08.080]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:08.080 --> 01:18:09.080]  I need my truth pick.
[01:18:09.080 --> 01:18:11.080]  I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:18:11.080 --> 01:18:14.080]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:14.080 --> 01:18:17.080]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite.
[01:18:17.080 --> 01:18:21.080]  And I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:21.080 --> 01:18:22.080]  Can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.080 --> 01:18:24.080]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.080 --> 01:18:30.080]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:30.080 --> 01:18:32.080]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:32.080 --> 01:18:35.080]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:35.080 --> 01:18:38.080]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.080 --> 01:18:44.080]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:44.080 --> 01:18:45.080]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:45.080 --> 01:18:46.080]  No.
[01:18:46.080 --> 01:18:48.080]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:48.080 --> 01:18:49.080]  No.
[01:18:49.080 --> 01:18:50.080]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:18:50.080 --> 01:18:51.080]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.080 --> 01:18:52.080]  Wow.
[01:18:52.080 --> 01:18:54.080]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.080 --> 01:18:56.080]  This is perfect.
[01:18:56.080 --> 01:18:57.080]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.080 --> 01:18:59.080]  We are Logos.
[01:18:59.080 --> 01:19:01.080]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:01.080 --> 01:19:29.080]  This is the Logos Logos RadioNetwork.
[01:19:29.080 --> 01:19:35.080]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:35.080 --> 01:19:40.080]  Randy Kelton of Rood of Love Radio and we're talking to Sonny and Georgia.
[01:19:40.080 --> 01:19:50.080]  Okay, Sonny, where were we when I didn't run off the cliff?
[01:19:50.080 --> 01:19:59.080]  It gives me an idea of titling my next motion of you got to read it.
[01:19:59.080 --> 01:20:02.080]  That's it.
[01:20:02.080 --> 01:20:10.080]  I suggest you not tell them because that comes under the heading of Fair Warning.
[01:20:10.080 --> 01:20:13.080]  Fair Warning is a no-no.
[01:20:13.080 --> 01:20:23.080]  Not to read it, I had a friend years ago that he had a judge that was not reading his pleadings.
[01:20:23.080 --> 01:20:25.080]  This was in the federal court.
[01:20:25.080 --> 01:20:33.080]  In one of the pleadings, he put in there that the judge's wife was sleeping with the court
[01:20:33.080 --> 01:20:36.080]  reporter or some nonsense like that.
[01:20:36.080 --> 01:20:44.080]  The judge came in and just ruled on the pleading and the guy trying to think of his name.
[01:20:44.080 --> 01:20:46.080]  This guy was nuts.
[01:20:46.080 --> 01:20:52.080]  He objected and asked the court if he had actually read the pleading.
[01:20:52.080 --> 01:20:54.080]  He said, of course I read the pleading.
[01:20:54.080 --> 01:20:57.080]  Did you read the part about where your wife was sleeping with the court reporter?
[01:20:57.080 --> 01:20:59.080]  What?
[01:20:59.080 --> 01:21:05.080]  He goes down there and there it is.
[01:21:05.080 --> 01:21:07.080]  That worked really well.
[01:21:07.080 --> 01:21:10.080]  He got the judge good.
[01:21:10.080 --> 01:21:16.080]  I don't remember what happened about it, but he caught him flat footed.
[01:21:16.080 --> 01:21:22.080]  You might look at something like that, something critical.
[01:21:22.080 --> 01:21:25.080]  Well, it won't take much.
[01:21:25.080 --> 01:21:33.080]  If you write the pleadings and the judge has a duty to rule on every issue you bring.
[01:21:33.080 --> 01:21:38.080]  I have a standard what we can and I call a mother hubbard motion.
[01:21:38.080 --> 01:21:41.080]  The mother hubbard motion covers everything.
[01:21:41.080 --> 01:21:51.080]  It specifically requests the court read and rule on every issue and every pleading.
[01:21:51.080 --> 01:21:56.080]  Then we can go back when the judge renders a ruling and he doesn't address every issue
[01:21:56.080 --> 01:22:04.080]  and every pleading then we file against the judge for denial of due process.
[01:22:04.080 --> 01:22:08.080]  This isn't an approach nobody's taken.
[01:22:08.080 --> 01:22:11.080]  Lawyers certainly won't do it.
[01:22:11.080 --> 01:22:15.080]  And proceeds for the most part have not known how to do it.
[01:22:15.080 --> 01:22:20.080]  But when the judge fails to rule on an issue in one of your pleading,
[01:22:20.080 --> 01:22:27.080]  he's denying you a due process and that's a crime in every state.
[01:22:27.080 --> 01:22:30.080]  So we file against him criminally.
[01:22:30.080 --> 01:22:33.080]  These judges think they're immune.
[01:22:33.080 --> 01:22:39.080]  Well, they don't have any immune, any immunity from criminal prosecution.
[01:22:39.080 --> 01:22:48.080]  Now, they may be pretty well sure that everybody in line will step up to protect them.
[01:22:48.080 --> 01:22:57.080]  But what we're doing now is we're writing our pleadings in a way that suggests WECO.
[01:22:57.080 --> 01:23:07.080]  In a pleading I just recently wrote, I stated that the council and the city council members
[01:23:07.080 --> 01:23:17.080]  acted in concert and collusion toward predicate acts in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy
[01:23:17.080 --> 01:23:21.080]  to deprive the litigant of due process.
[01:23:21.080 --> 01:23:26.080]  Tim's listing this is in one of his cases.
[01:23:26.080 --> 01:23:32.080]  A smart lawyer whose own his toes will read that and say to his client,
[01:23:32.080 --> 01:23:36.080]  these guys are preparing a federal WECO suit against you guys.
[01:23:36.080 --> 01:23:40.080]  So we laid these little plants whether we do or not.
[01:23:40.080 --> 01:23:49.080]  I had a federal judge once tell me that filing a WECO suit is like dropping an atomic bomb.
[01:23:49.080 --> 01:23:58.080]  It is really a big deal because you get to elicit testimony under the rules of civil procedure
[01:23:58.080 --> 01:24:02.080]  and then come back and use them for criminal prosecution.
[01:24:02.080 --> 01:24:09.080]  It kind of bypasses their Fifth Amendment right.
[01:24:09.080 --> 01:24:11.080]  So you might consider that.
[01:24:11.080 --> 01:24:16.080]  You might look at a 42 U.S. Code 1983 suit.
[01:24:16.080 --> 01:24:18.080]  Not that you're going to file one.
[01:24:18.080 --> 01:24:21.080]  I'm sorry, not 42 U.S. Code 1983.
[01:24:21.080 --> 01:24:22.080]  A WECO suit.
[01:24:22.080 --> 01:24:23.080]  Federal WECO.
[01:24:23.080 --> 01:24:33.080]  See what federal WECO requires and then use that terminology and those legal structures in your pleadings.
[01:24:33.080 --> 01:24:40.080]  If you want them to begin to rule in your favor, if you tell them you're going to file a WECO suit,
[01:24:40.080 --> 01:24:42.080]  they may not believe you.
[01:24:42.080 --> 01:24:48.080]  But if they look in your pleadings and you've got clues in there and they think they're really smart
[01:24:48.080 --> 01:24:53.080]  and they stitch these clues together and some Jack Lake lawyer says,
[01:24:53.080 --> 01:25:00.080]  wait a minute guys, based on his verbiage, this guy is setting us up for a WECO suit.
[01:25:00.080 --> 01:25:05.080]  I had a bailiff come out and ordered me out of a courtroom.
[01:25:05.080 --> 01:25:11.080]  He came out and I was called a 911 on him and he called his sergeant.
[01:25:11.080 --> 01:25:17.080]  His sergeant wouldn't tell me his name and I asked the 911 operator who the sergeant was.
[01:25:17.080 --> 01:25:19.080]  And the court, well which sergeant?
[01:25:19.080 --> 01:25:21.080]  The big fat one.
[01:25:21.080 --> 01:25:27.080]  And I'm looking him right in the face.
[01:25:27.080 --> 01:25:35.080]  The bailiff went back in the courtroom and the people in the courtroom heard him go up to the judge and say,
[01:25:35.080 --> 01:25:41.080]  this counten guy is out there in the hall and he's setting us up for a WECO suit.
[01:25:41.080 --> 01:25:44.080]  The bailiff got it.
[01:25:44.080 --> 01:25:48.080]  And he was right, I was.
[01:25:48.080 --> 01:25:52.080]  So if they figure it out, then it's absolutely true.
[01:25:52.080 --> 01:25:54.080]  Then you get their attention.
[01:25:54.080 --> 01:25:59.080]  If you tell them, they're not going to believe you.
[01:25:59.080 --> 01:26:14.080]  You know, back to this idea of the title not really being ruling but having to rule on the substance of the motion.
[01:26:14.080 --> 01:26:20.080]  Doesn't that presume that the judge has to know the law?
[01:26:20.080 --> 01:26:28.080]  If he has to read through and pick out the element and the substance that would fit a particular...
[01:26:28.080 --> 01:26:30.080]  No, no.
[01:26:30.080 --> 01:26:34.080]  Okay, and let me explain why I say that.
[01:26:34.080 --> 01:26:37.080]  The judge doesn't have to know the law.
[01:26:37.080 --> 01:26:40.080]  The law has to be in the pleading.
[01:26:40.080 --> 01:26:46.080]  If the law is in the pleading, no matter what you call the pleading,
[01:26:46.080 --> 01:26:53.080]  if the argument goes to a particular issue, then the judge has to address that issue.
[01:26:53.080 --> 01:27:00.080]  He can't not address an issue because it doesn't seem to match the title.
[01:27:00.080 --> 01:27:13.080]  If you file a motion to dismiss and you accuse the parties of perpetrating multiple predicate acts
[01:27:13.080 --> 01:27:18.080]  toward an ongoing criminal conspiracy to deprive you of your rights,
[01:27:18.080 --> 01:27:23.080]  he has to construe that as RICO because that's what it is.
[01:27:23.080 --> 01:27:33.080]  No matter what you call the motion, that's a RICO allegation and he has to construe it that way.
[01:27:33.080 --> 01:27:39.080]  That party has to know what he's reading and that's why judges have to be lawyers.
[01:27:39.080 --> 01:27:43.080]  They're not presumed to be totally ignorant.
[01:27:43.080 --> 01:27:51.080]  They are presumed to know all of the rules and this would be governed by the rules.
[01:27:51.080 --> 01:27:54.080]  Am I making sense here?
[01:27:54.080 --> 01:28:01.080]  My headset, my system here, it delivers the sound of what I speak back into my headset
[01:28:01.080 --> 01:28:07.080]  so I have to listen to what I'm saying and I'm not sure it makes sense to myself.
[01:28:07.080 --> 01:28:09.080]  I get that sometimes.
[01:28:09.080 --> 01:28:17.080]  In saying it, the judge doesn't have to know his law but then he has to know how to apply the law.
[01:28:17.080 --> 01:28:21.080]  I get your issue.
[01:28:21.080 --> 01:28:26.080]  How can he know how to apply the law if he doesn't know what it is?
[01:28:26.080 --> 01:28:32.080]  Yeah, I think that it's the case of them trying to have their cake and eat it too
[01:28:32.080 --> 01:28:40.080]  where they want to not have the liability of being held to the standard of knowing the law
[01:28:40.080 --> 01:28:44.080]  but then they have to actually know the law to do their job.
[01:28:44.080 --> 01:28:51.080]  They have to know how to properly apply the law to the facts.
[01:28:51.080 --> 01:28:56.080]  That's a special skill that lawyers learn over time.
[01:28:56.080 --> 01:29:08.080]  While he may not have to have the law memorized, he does have to know how to properly apply it to the facts.
[01:29:08.080 --> 01:29:14.080]  I don't know how to really make that more clear.
[01:29:14.080 --> 01:29:19.080]  It's kind of clear as mud even to me as I say it.
[01:29:19.080 --> 01:29:25.080]  Doesn't that presume that, for example, the judge should...
[01:29:25.080 --> 01:29:33.080]  Okay, the judge should have to know whether the Constitution is the law
[01:29:33.080 --> 01:29:37.080]  or whether the Anticles of Confederation apply or...
[01:29:37.080 --> 01:29:41.080]  Okay, hold on, hold on. The Constitution is not the law
[01:29:41.080 --> 01:29:50.080]  but he is absolutely required to know that because he's sworn to uphold it.
[01:29:50.080 --> 01:29:55.080]  The Constitution is a set of restrictions on his behavior. He has to know that. Hang on.
[01:29:55.080 --> 01:29:58.080]  Go on to break. Rain DeCaltan with Law Radio will be right back.
[01:29:58.080 --> 01:30:01.080]  John, Greg, we'll see you there. We'll get to both of you.
[01:30:01.080 --> 01:30:05.080]  Turnabout is fair play unless you're videotaping the cops.
[01:30:05.080 --> 01:30:10.080]  While police can freely film the public, citizens doing the same could wind up in handcuffs.
[01:30:10.080 --> 01:30:15.080]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you more about policing the police in just a moment.
[01:30:15.080 --> 01:30:22.080]  The First Engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:22.080 --> 01:30:25.080]  That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:25.080 --> 01:30:28.080]  StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:28.080 --> 01:30:33.080]  StartPage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies,
[01:30:33.080 --> 01:30:39.080]  and their third party certified. If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with StartPage.
[01:30:39.080 --> 01:30:44.080]  Great search results and total privacy. StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:44.080 --> 01:30:49.080]  Filming the police could land you in the slammer. Case in point, Anthony Gruber.
[01:30:49.080 --> 01:30:57.080]  Arrested after posting footage of his speeding citation on YouTube, he faced a 16-year prison term for wiretapping.
[01:30:57.080 --> 01:31:02.080]  His footage featured a plainclothes state trooper jumping out of an unmarked car, screaming at Gruber,
[01:31:02.080 --> 01:31:05.080]  and brandishing a gun before identifying himself.
[01:31:05.080 --> 01:31:09.080]  Gruber spent 26 hours in jail and had his computer seized.
[01:31:09.080 --> 01:31:14.080]  While his case was later thrown out of Maryland court, videographers in other states could be convicted.
[01:31:14.080 --> 01:31:18.080]  Documenting police practices empowers the people and should be illegal.
[01:31:18.080 --> 01:31:22.080]  I say let the cameras roll. It might just put the civil back in civil servant.
[01:31:22.080 --> 01:31:27.080]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.080 --> 01:31:36.080]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.080 --> 01:31:43.080]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.080 --> 01:31:46.080]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.080 --> 01:31:48.080]  And thousands of my fellow force responders have died.
[01:31:48.080 --> 01:31:50.080]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.080 --> 01:31:51.080]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.080 --> 01:31:52.080]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.080 --> 01:31:53.080]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.080 --> 01:31:55.080]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.080 --> 01:31:57.080]  We are Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.080 --> 01:32:00.080]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.080 --> 01:32:03.080]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.080 --> 01:32:06.080]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.080 --> 01:32:09.080]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails.
[01:32:09.080 --> 01:32:11.080]  But good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.080 --> 01:32:13.080]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails.
[01:32:13.080 --> 01:32:14.080]  But I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.080 --> 01:32:21.080]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.080 --> 01:32:26.080]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.080 --> 01:32:32.080]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.080 --> 01:32:38.080]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.080 --> 01:32:40.080]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off.
[01:32:40.080 --> 01:32:45.080]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.080 --> 01:32:50.080]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:50.080 --> 01:32:56.080]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.080 --> 01:32:58.080]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.080 --> 01:33:02.080]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:02.080 --> 01:33:04.080]  Looking for some truth?
[01:33:04.080 --> 01:33:31.080]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:31.080 --> 01:33:36.080]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with the radio and we're talking to Sonny and Georgia.
[01:33:36.080 --> 01:33:38.080]  Okay, Sonny, we do need to move along.
[01:33:38.080 --> 01:33:41.080]  Got a whole stack of callers and they've been patient with us.
[01:33:41.080 --> 01:33:45.080]  Do you have anything else for us?
[01:33:45.080 --> 01:33:57.080]  One last thing that if I understand it right, the judges go out to Nevada to get their training out there.
[01:33:57.080 --> 01:33:59.080]  Isn't that right?
[01:33:59.080 --> 01:34:04.080]  I don't know. It depends on the state.
[01:34:04.080 --> 01:34:09.080]  They set up these trainings and they set them up in nice, expensive, exotic places.
[01:34:09.080 --> 01:34:17.080]  Nevada, Las Vegas where there are lots of sexy women around so the judges have lots of discreet diversion.
[01:34:17.080 --> 01:34:21.080]  Yeah, I would suspect they would do that.
[01:34:21.080 --> 01:34:30.080]  It seems that, at least in Georgia and other states, it appears to be, it may be nationwide, I'm not certain,
[01:34:30.080 --> 01:34:37.080]  but there's a judicial training center in Nevada at one of the universities.
[01:34:37.080 --> 01:34:48.080]  Anyway, it just made me wonder if an open records request would, if you'd be able to get judicial training information
[01:34:48.080 --> 01:34:51.080]  into something that's paid for money.
[01:34:51.080 --> 01:34:58.080]  If Georgia pays for it, you should be able to get it even if it's in Nevada.
[01:34:58.080 --> 01:35:02.080]  Now, I filed an information request here in Tennessee because I had a Texas license.
[01:35:02.080 --> 01:35:05.080]  They said that I didn't have a right to the information.
[01:35:05.080 --> 01:35:09.080]  Well, that's dubious.
[01:35:09.080 --> 01:35:20.080]  But if my information request was for information that was paid for by the state of Texas, I would have a right to it.
[01:35:20.080 --> 01:35:29.080]  So even if it's in Nevada and you're in Georgia, if Georgia paid for it, you have a right to it.
[01:35:29.080 --> 01:35:36.080]  If they provided any manuals, you'd have a right to see those from the judge.
[01:35:36.080 --> 01:35:47.080]  I would give him a request for all of the training manuals that he's received at the cost of the government.
[01:35:47.080 --> 01:35:52.080]  That'll jerk a notch in his shorts.
[01:35:52.080 --> 01:35:55.080]  Okay, well, thank you so much, Randy.
[01:35:55.080 --> 01:35:58.080]  Keep setting them up and knocking them down.
[01:35:58.080 --> 01:36:00.080]  Okay, thank you, Sonny.
[01:36:00.080 --> 01:36:04.080]  Okay, now we're going to go to John in New York.
[01:36:04.080 --> 01:36:06.080]  Hi, John.
[01:36:06.080 --> 01:36:07.080]  Hi.
[01:36:07.080 --> 01:36:10.080]  What do you have for us today?
[01:36:10.080 --> 01:36:12.080]  Well, it's not so much what I have.
[01:36:12.080 --> 01:36:13.080]  It's what you have.
[01:36:13.080 --> 01:36:16.080]  You've got knowledge and a lot of it.
[01:36:16.080 --> 01:36:26.080]  Well, I can tell you with certainty because everybody says so that I am a fart smeller and a deep stinker.
[01:36:26.080 --> 01:36:30.080]  My wife tells me that all the time.
[01:36:30.080 --> 01:36:33.080]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:36:33.080 --> 01:36:39.080]  Okay, do you have enough paperwork on Virginia's situation?
[01:36:39.080 --> 01:36:43.080]  I've heard about five, I think five.
[01:36:43.080 --> 01:36:44.080]  Okay, hold on, hold on, hold on.
[01:36:44.080 --> 01:36:46.080]  That's off to your stuff.
[01:36:46.080 --> 01:36:48.080]  Okay, got you.
[01:36:48.080 --> 01:36:53.080]  Okay, I mean, okay.
[01:36:53.080 --> 01:36:57.080]  I got a situation here that another situation.
[01:36:57.080 --> 01:37:03.080]  Bear with me, I'm going to go through this as quickly as I can, it should take me about a minute and a half, two minutes.
[01:37:03.080 --> 01:37:04.080]  Okay.
[01:37:04.080 --> 01:37:05.080]  Here we go.
[01:37:05.080 --> 01:37:07.080]  Here we go.
[01:37:07.080 --> 01:37:15.080]  This has to do with local police doing nothing when you call them for threats to do harm to you or for repeated harassment.
[01:37:15.080 --> 01:37:23.080]  This is about a single 51-year-old female and male adults who threaten and harass her and the police do nothing.
[01:37:23.080 --> 01:37:29.080]  The people doing these things to her live both next door and across the street.
[01:37:29.080 --> 01:37:41.080]  Male tough guy, wherever a 51-year-old woman is, clearly makes a point of being around her, grinning, making fun, harassing, showing aggression,
[01:37:41.080 --> 01:37:49.080]  clearly stalking, and one time at the bus station, she was sitting inside that semi-glass enclosure.
[01:37:49.080 --> 01:37:54.080]  She's inside, he's outside with the glass separating the two of them.
[01:37:54.080 --> 01:37:57.080]  She's sitting one foot away from the glass.
[01:37:57.080 --> 01:38:08.080]  He sticks his face up against the glass, literally one foot away from her face, sprints his hands, eagle wide on the glass, giving her dirty looks, dirty laps,
[01:38:08.080 --> 01:38:11.080]  and a very aggressive manner.
[01:38:11.080 --> 01:38:14.080]  Next situation, the one's next door.
[01:38:14.080 --> 01:38:26.080]  A person from that house gets in her car, guns the engine, and comes charging straight for the 51-year-old woman in the car while holding her three-year-old grandchild in her arms.
[01:38:26.080 --> 01:38:30.080]  And the child says, Grandma, they're going to hit us with the car.
[01:38:30.080 --> 01:38:34.080]  Even the three-year-old could see what was going on.
[01:38:34.080 --> 01:38:37.080]  Okay, did she file assault with a motor vehicle?
[01:38:37.080 --> 01:38:40.080]  Or did she just call the police?
[01:38:40.080 --> 01:38:42.080]  She'd call the police.
[01:38:42.080 --> 01:38:46.080]  There's more, and please bear with me a moment.
[01:38:46.080 --> 01:38:51.080]  What do you do when somebody steals her brand new $200 bicycle?
[01:38:51.080 --> 01:38:54.080]  I saw the guy from two feet away riding it.
[01:38:54.080 --> 01:38:58.080]  I wasn't sure it was her bike, but I could identify him.
[01:38:58.080 --> 01:39:06.080]  He's identified by name by the 51-year-old woman's two daughters who knew who he was.
[01:39:06.080 --> 01:39:13.080]  The 51-year-old woman takes a picture of him sitting on the bike, her bike 50 feet away from her porch.
[01:39:13.080 --> 01:39:15.080]  Cops did nothing.
[01:39:15.080 --> 01:39:23.080]  What do you do when a tough gangster type from across the street comes towards her while I was on the phone talking with her?
[01:39:23.080 --> 01:39:31.080]  I heard him, myself, and he started threatening her, screaming at her, saying, Are you strong?
[01:39:31.080 --> 01:39:33.080]  Because we're going to fight.
[01:39:33.080 --> 01:39:36.080]  And I turned white as a ghost.
[01:39:36.080 --> 01:39:39.080]  I called 911 on another phone.
[01:39:39.080 --> 01:39:42.080]  The cops came and did nothing.
[01:39:42.080 --> 01:39:46.080]  Then a half an hour later, she calls me again on the phone,
[01:39:46.080 --> 01:39:51.080]  and this guy is still following her across town, threatening her some more.
[01:39:51.080 --> 01:39:54.080]  And I called 911 again.
[01:39:54.080 --> 01:39:57.080]  All the above situations, the cops got called.
[01:39:57.080 --> 01:39:59.080]  They did nothing.
[01:39:59.080 --> 01:40:04.080]  At that point, I got sick of it. She and I went to the police station. I told one officer,
[01:40:04.080 --> 01:40:10.080]  I guarantee you, if you had a wife, girlfriend, sister, or somebody you knew that some guy was doing all this too,
[01:40:10.080 --> 01:40:15.080]  I guarantee you you'd do something about it in a heartbeat.
[01:40:15.080 --> 01:40:18.080]  I spoke to the lieutenant another time.
[01:40:18.080 --> 01:40:23.080]  I told him the police do nothing, and he insulted my intelligence by saying,
[01:40:23.080 --> 01:40:29.080]  Al, you're her friend, so you and her daughters would be unreliable witnesses.
[01:40:29.080 --> 01:40:32.080]  So that's why the cops did nothing.
[01:40:32.080 --> 01:40:34.080]  Here's our last sentence.
[01:40:34.080 --> 01:40:36.080]  Long one.
[01:40:36.080 --> 01:40:38.080]  These undesirables have taken over her life.
[01:40:38.080 --> 01:40:40.080]  They've turned her life into a mess.
[01:40:40.080 --> 01:40:43.080]  She's afraid to be seen leaving the house.
[01:40:43.080 --> 01:40:45.080]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:40:45.080 --> 01:40:49.080]  File criminal charges against the chief of police.
[01:40:49.080 --> 01:40:51.080]  The chief?
[01:40:51.080 --> 01:40:54.080]  She should. Yeah, the chief.
[01:40:54.080 --> 01:40:58.080]  Oh, I thought the cops.
[01:40:58.080 --> 01:41:00.080]  Wait, do what?
[01:41:00.080 --> 01:41:02.080]  No, no, no, not the cops.
[01:41:02.080 --> 01:41:07.080]  The chief of police is sitting back there minding his own business,
[01:41:07.080 --> 01:41:17.080]  and the people for whom he is responding at superior are committing a malfeasance in office.
[01:41:17.080 --> 01:41:22.080]  Now, they're going to claim they have no duty to protect her, but they do have a duty to enforce law,
[01:41:22.080 --> 01:41:29.080]  and when you give them notice that crimes have been committed and they fail to act on those crimes,
[01:41:29.080 --> 01:41:31.080]  then they commit crimes.
[01:41:31.080 --> 01:41:37.080]  But they're acting in accordance with the directions of the chief,
[01:41:37.080 --> 01:41:44.080]  or even better, file against the mayor, because the mayor hired the chief.
[01:41:44.080 --> 01:41:47.080]  Is that the way it is even in small towns?
[01:41:47.080 --> 01:41:50.080]  Yeah, especially in small towns.
[01:41:50.080 --> 01:41:51.080]  Okay.
[01:41:51.080 --> 01:41:53.080]  That's the way it always is in municipality.
[01:41:53.080 --> 01:42:00.080]  I don't know if any chiefs of police that are elected are all appointed by the mayor and the city council,
[01:42:00.080 --> 01:42:03.080]  and the mayor is responding at superior,
[01:42:03.080 --> 01:42:08.080]  so make up a set of criminal complaints against the mayor.
[01:42:08.080 --> 01:42:12.080]  You might charge the mayor with depraved heart assault.
[01:42:12.080 --> 01:42:15.080]  Look up depraved heart assault.
[01:42:15.080 --> 01:42:19.080]  I saw the second word, heart?
[01:42:19.080 --> 01:42:26.080]  Heart, A-T-A-R-T, acts of a depraved heart.
[01:42:26.080 --> 01:42:29.080]  There was a program called Lie to Me.
[01:42:29.080 --> 01:42:37.080]  It was about micro expressions and how to detect people who were lying to you.
[01:42:37.080 --> 01:42:46.080]  There's a program on there where this guy used these Indian women for...
[01:42:46.080 --> 01:42:49.080]  They were dancers.
[01:42:49.080 --> 01:42:53.080]  And then somehow their family found out about it,
[01:42:53.080 --> 01:42:58.080]  and this girl called this guy telling him that he was supposed to pay them
[01:42:58.080 --> 01:43:00.080]  so that they could have an abortion.
[01:43:00.080 --> 01:43:03.080]  That's why they did this, or to have a baby or something.
[01:43:03.080 --> 01:43:07.080]  And anyway, he refused to pay them, and she was going to kill herself.
[01:43:07.080 --> 01:43:10.080]  And he told her to go ahead, and she did.
[01:43:10.080 --> 01:43:15.080]  That was the braved heart murder.
[01:43:15.080 --> 01:43:20.080]  She knew she was going to commit suicide because of what this guy had done,
[01:43:20.080 --> 01:43:22.080]  and he took no action to prevent it.
[01:43:22.080 --> 01:43:25.080]  That was murder on his part.
[01:43:25.080 --> 01:43:33.080]  The chief of police, the police department, knows that this woman's being continually assaulted
[01:43:33.080 --> 01:43:36.080]  and they refuse to take any action to prevent it.
[01:43:36.080 --> 01:43:38.080]  That's the braved heart assault.
[01:43:38.080 --> 01:43:40.080]  Charge the mayor with it.
[01:43:40.080 --> 01:43:46.080]  The mayor will go ballistic when he gets charged with the braved heart assault.
[01:43:46.080 --> 01:43:51.080]  The braved heart, that's such a good name.
[01:43:51.080 --> 01:43:55.080]  It just drips with malice.
[01:43:55.080 --> 01:44:00.080]  So charge the mayor with the braved heart assault, send a copy of the...
[01:44:00.080 --> 01:44:03.080]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:44:03.080 --> 01:44:06.080]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion,
[01:44:06.080 --> 01:44:09.080]  and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:09.080 --> 01:44:13.080]  Did you know the US government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:44:13.080 --> 01:44:17.080]  and classified it as a schedule one drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.080 --> 01:44:20.080]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years,
[01:44:20.080 --> 01:44:22.080]  and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:44:22.080 --> 01:44:27.080]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.080 --> 01:44:30.080]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.080 --> 01:44:33.080]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:44:33.080 --> 01:44:39.080]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.080 --> 01:44:46.080]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO,
[01:44:46.080 --> 01:44:53.080]  and is loaded with nutrients, call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367,
[01:44:53.080 --> 01:45:00.080]  and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you, only at hempUSA.org.
[01:45:01.080 --> 01:45:04.080]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.080 --> 01:45:08.080]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:08.080 --> 01:45:14.080]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:45:14.080 --> 01:45:16.080]  step by step.
[01:45:16.080 --> 01:45:19.080]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.080 --> 01:45:23.080]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.080 --> 01:45:28.080]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.080 --> 01:45:34.080]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.080 --> 01:45:39.080]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.080 --> 01:45:43.080]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.080 --> 01:45:49.080]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.080 --> 01:45:52.080]  prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.080 --> 01:45:56.080]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.080 --> 01:46:23.080]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.080 --> 01:46:26.080]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:26.080 --> 01:46:33.080]  Randy Kelton of Rule of Law Radio on this, the 11th day of May, 2018,
[01:46:33.080 --> 01:46:36.080]  and we're talking to John in New York.
[01:46:36.080 --> 01:46:42.080]  Oh, John, depraved heart assault against the mayor.
[01:46:42.080 --> 01:46:46.080]  Oh, he will go ballistic.
[01:46:46.080 --> 01:46:53.080]  And he's going to go down to the police department and crawl down the chief of police's throat.
[01:46:53.080 --> 01:46:57.080]  And when he gets through crawling down the chief of police's throat,
[01:46:57.080 --> 01:47:03.080]  the chief of police is going to be primed.
[01:47:03.080 --> 01:47:06.080]  That's my suggestion.
[01:47:06.080 --> 01:47:14.080]  In a minute, if you have any others, tell them to me, but I got to tell you this first.
[01:47:14.080 --> 01:47:17.080]  We live in a town that's a powder check.
[01:47:17.080 --> 01:47:24.080]  It's only about 15,000 people, but we have a large population of ethnic.
[01:47:24.080 --> 01:47:30.080]  There's a lot of blacks and a lot of Hispanics, and that's who is doing this to her.
[01:47:30.080 --> 01:47:37.080]  The police, there was a shooting a while ago, and the police had to shoot a guy who was black.
[01:47:37.080 --> 01:47:44.080]  I believe he was black in a car, and it raised a real hubbub because he didn't have a weapon.
[01:47:44.080 --> 01:47:49.080]  But the police officer maintained that the guy was ordered several times with his hands up,
[01:47:49.080 --> 01:47:50.080]  get out of the car.
[01:47:50.080 --> 01:47:51.080]  He didn't do so.
[01:47:51.080 --> 01:47:57.080]  And then the guy bent down reportedly and got something under this,
[01:47:57.080 --> 01:48:00.080]  looked like he was going for something under the seat.
[01:48:00.080 --> 01:48:05.080]  And the cop saw that and thought his life was being threatened, and he shot him.
[01:48:05.080 --> 01:48:07.080]  The guy's dead.
[01:48:07.080 --> 01:48:11.080]  Ever since, and that was the excuse.
[01:48:11.080 --> 01:48:18.080]  This town has always let the ethnic groups get away with murder, almost literally.
[01:48:18.080 --> 01:48:20.080]  We have a very high crime rate here.
[01:48:20.080 --> 01:48:23.080]  It's a very serious situation.
[01:48:23.080 --> 01:48:25.080]  They've taken over the town.
[01:48:25.080 --> 01:48:30.080]  Anybody who hears me talking, they're going to immediately say, oh, he's a racist.
[01:48:30.080 --> 01:48:32.080]  It has nothing to do with racism.
[01:48:32.080 --> 01:48:36.080]  It has to do with behavior.
[01:48:36.080 --> 01:48:39.080]  Okay, got that part.
[01:48:39.080 --> 01:48:43.080]  Okay, this is, clearly this is political.
[01:48:43.080 --> 01:48:51.080]  The police have enough political problems because one of there are officers acting in accordance with his training
[01:48:51.080 --> 01:48:56.080]  and was so terrified of the people that he is working for
[01:48:56.080 --> 01:49:03.080]  that he needs to be out picking up dead cats and skunks off the highway instead of walking around with a pistol on his hip.
[01:49:03.080 --> 01:49:07.080]  Okay, now they created this mess for themselves.
[01:49:07.080 --> 01:49:11.080]  So help them out with their mess.
[01:49:11.080 --> 01:49:19.080]  Accused them of doing exactly this and then go for the mayor for depraved heart assault
[01:49:19.080 --> 01:49:33.080]  for allowing these ethnic groups to commit mayhem against the Caucasian population in order to avoid political turmoil.
[01:49:33.080 --> 01:49:37.080]  File against him with the district attorney.
[01:49:37.080 --> 01:49:47.080]  The district attorney will call the mayor and say, I got somebody down here trying to get me to prosecute you for depraved heart assault.
[01:49:47.080 --> 01:49:50.080]  And then the mayor is going to be real unhappy.
[01:49:50.080 --> 01:49:58.080]  The prosecutor is not going to prosecute him, but he's going to have to talk to him in order to cover his own behind
[01:49:58.080 --> 01:50:01.080]  and get the mayor's side of the story.
[01:50:01.080 --> 01:50:09.080]  And when the mayor gets here's about it, he's going to be down to the chief and you're going to create some politics of your own.
[01:50:09.080 --> 01:50:12.080]  Everything's political.
[01:50:12.080 --> 01:50:14.080]  All politics is local.
[01:50:14.080 --> 01:50:25.080]  That's what I'm afraid of and I'm afraid for her safety, they'll find a dead body in her trunk or a dead body in her basement.
[01:50:25.080 --> 01:50:26.080]  No, no, no, no.
[01:50:26.080 --> 01:50:36.080]  Once you file charges against the mayor, if a policeman just frowns at her, you file criminal charges against the mayor again.
[01:50:36.080 --> 01:50:38.080]  I understand that.
[01:50:38.080 --> 01:50:39.080]  And the cop.
[01:50:39.080 --> 01:50:41.080]  No, you're missing it.
[01:50:41.080 --> 01:50:44.080]  You think these cops are big and bad.
[01:50:44.080 --> 01:50:45.080]  They're not.
[01:50:45.080 --> 01:50:47.080]  They're cowards.
[01:50:47.080 --> 01:50:59.080]  And when you think their boss is boss and their boss's boss comes down to their boss and reams him out and the chief comes and reams these guys out,
[01:50:59.080 --> 01:51:05.080]  the last thing they're going to want to do is have anything to do with this woman.
[01:51:05.080 --> 01:51:09.080]  They don't have enough courage for that.
[01:51:09.080 --> 01:51:12.080]  They're cowards.
[01:51:12.080 --> 01:51:23.080]  In the county I live in, the sheriff actually told his officers not to stop me, not to cite me, and whatever you do, don't put that SOB in my jail
[01:51:23.080 --> 01:51:29.080]  because I caused him serious political grief.
[01:51:29.080 --> 01:51:38.080]  When you start going after the mayor, these chumps on the bottom, if you call them and they don't show up timely,
[01:51:38.080 --> 01:51:42.080]  accuse the mayor of telling them not to respond to your calls.
[01:51:42.080 --> 01:51:47.080]  And the mayor's going to have a fit.
[01:51:47.080 --> 01:51:51.080]  The guys at the bottom are cowards.
[01:51:51.080 --> 01:51:55.080]  They're terrified of everybody above them.
[01:51:55.080 --> 01:51:57.080]  That's how you keep them off of you.
[01:51:57.080 --> 01:52:01.080]  And that's how you get them enough trouble from their boss.
[01:52:01.080 --> 01:52:03.080]  They're going to come down and get these guys straight.
[01:52:03.080 --> 01:52:10.080]  Just like you did with that dance hall or whatever, where they were causing you a problem.
[01:52:10.080 --> 01:52:13.080]  Just like what?
[01:52:13.080 --> 01:52:19.080]  You get the bosses upset, the guys down on the bottom get hopping.
[01:52:19.080 --> 01:52:24.080]  I'll tell you, go pass all these guys, go to the mayor, blame the mayor for doing this.
[01:52:24.080 --> 01:52:28.080]  Anything else I could do besides that?
[01:52:28.080 --> 01:52:35.080]  Shoot them. That's probably not a good idea because they shoot back.
[01:52:35.080 --> 01:52:43.080]  You're going to give the police a reason to fear you and this woman more than they fear them.
[01:52:43.080 --> 01:52:47.080]  Yeah, but I'm afraid that they're going to take it out on either one of us.
[01:52:47.080 --> 01:52:53.080]  Then stand there and be shot at. That's your option.
[01:52:53.080 --> 01:52:55.080]  That's what they count on.
[01:52:55.080 --> 01:52:58.080]  I can take care of myself, but I'm worried about her.
[01:52:58.080 --> 01:53:00.080]  What's she going to do?
[01:53:00.080 --> 01:53:03.080]  Nothing.
[01:53:03.080 --> 01:53:07.080]  I don't have another option.
[01:53:07.080 --> 01:53:12.080]  Just stand back and let them keep doing what they're doing or stand up.
[01:53:12.080 --> 01:53:14.080]  And I'm telling you the best way to do it.
[01:53:14.080 --> 01:53:16.080]  Don't go over the police.
[01:53:16.080 --> 01:53:19.080]  Don't go to these guys and appeal to their better nature.
[01:53:19.080 --> 01:53:24.080]  Don't go to the police and appeal to their professionalism because they're responding to politics from above.
[01:53:24.080 --> 01:53:28.080]  So go where the politics is.
[01:53:28.080 --> 01:53:30.080]  Gotcha. I understand.
[01:53:30.080 --> 01:53:35.080]  File a criminal charge against the mayor with the state attorney general.
[01:53:35.080 --> 01:53:36.080]  All right.
[01:53:36.080 --> 01:53:39.080]  And the mayor's going to come down and tell these people,
[01:53:39.080 --> 01:53:45.080]  you make sure that woman doesn't file charges with me again.
[01:53:45.080 --> 01:53:49.080]  Whatever her problem is, you better get it fixed.
[01:53:49.080 --> 01:53:57.080]  And then if a policeman says one word to her she doesn't like or these guys do what she complained about one more time,
[01:53:57.080 --> 01:54:04.080]  you file another complaint with the attorney general accusing the mayor of sending these people out here to harass you
[01:54:04.080 --> 01:54:07.080]  because you filed with the attorney general.
[01:54:07.080 --> 01:54:13.080]  And I guarantee you, the mayor is going to get apoplectic.
[01:54:13.080 --> 01:54:18.080]  He's a political animal.
[01:54:18.080 --> 01:54:22.080]  And what you're doing is creating political cannon fodder.
[01:54:22.080 --> 01:54:27.080]  You're not going to be able to protect yourself dealing with the police.
[01:54:27.080 --> 01:54:32.080]  And they're just not going to protect you.
[01:54:32.080 --> 01:54:34.080]  They're going to follow politics.
[01:54:34.080 --> 01:54:37.080]  So you got to go where they go.
[01:54:37.080 --> 01:54:39.080]  Go to politics.
[01:54:39.080 --> 01:54:46.080]  And you being the sovereign and you're the master of the servants,
[01:54:46.080 --> 01:54:50.080]  you go to the headmaster.
[01:54:50.080 --> 01:54:52.080]  Go to the attorney general.
[01:54:52.080 --> 01:54:54.080]  File your complaints with the attorney general.
[01:54:54.080 --> 01:54:58.080]  The attorney general, in order to cover his own political behind,
[01:54:58.080 --> 01:55:04.080]  is going to have to talk to the mayor and let the mayor know that you're filing with him
[01:55:04.080 --> 01:55:08.080]  accusing the mayor of depraving assault.
[01:55:08.080 --> 01:55:11.080]  And the mayor, when he gets a call from the attorney general,
[01:55:11.080 --> 01:55:14.080]  is going to be a really unhappy camper
[01:55:14.080 --> 01:55:17.080]  because he sees political cannon fodder come in his way.
[01:55:17.080 --> 01:55:21.080]  Next time he runs for election, his opponent,
[01:55:21.080 --> 01:55:26.080]  is likely to bring that out because his woman's likely to take all this stuff to the opponent
[01:55:26.080 --> 01:55:30.080]  so he can wave it in front of the public.
[01:55:30.080 --> 01:55:32.080]  Question.
[01:55:32.080 --> 01:55:36.080]  This town is a powder keg to give you an example.
[01:55:36.080 --> 01:55:40.080]  There was something going on.
[01:55:40.080 --> 01:55:44.080]  It was one of the local places that won't identify it.
[01:55:44.080 --> 01:55:46.080]  It was a riot.
[01:55:46.080 --> 01:55:48.080]  There were a bunch of kids rioting.
[01:55:48.080 --> 01:55:51.080]  It was almost like a riot, I say almost.
[01:55:51.080 --> 01:55:53.080]  And it ended up all over the streets.
[01:55:53.080 --> 01:55:58.080]  The police were called and they put some of the perps in jail.
[01:55:58.080 --> 01:56:01.080]  The perps were black.
[01:56:01.080 --> 01:56:04.080]  And I saw on the Internet, on YouTube,
[01:56:04.080 --> 01:56:07.080]  a group of women, black women,
[01:56:07.080 --> 01:56:10.080]  and they were screaming and they were saying,
[01:56:10.080 --> 01:56:13.080]  you got to let them go, you got to let them go.
[01:56:13.080 --> 01:56:18.080]  Well, if white people are guilty of a crime, they get jailed.
[01:56:18.080 --> 01:56:22.080]  You mean to tell me if black people are guilty of something,
[01:56:22.080 --> 01:56:24.080]  they don't get jailed?
[01:56:24.080 --> 01:56:26.080]  Is that it?
[01:56:26.080 --> 01:56:29.080]  There is a problem of equity here.
[01:56:29.080 --> 01:56:36.080]  Black people are disproportionately targeted for crime.
[01:56:36.080 --> 01:56:39.080]  I'm not going to say whether that's proper or improper,
[01:56:39.080 --> 01:56:44.080]  but the black community has had enough.
[01:56:44.080 --> 01:56:49.080]  And if they seem like they're overreacting, they may have to.
[01:56:49.080 --> 01:56:51.080]  Oh, I understand that.
[01:56:51.080 --> 01:56:53.080]  But now we're being victimized.
[01:56:53.080 --> 01:56:56.080]  Now, her life is a mess.
[01:56:56.080 --> 01:56:57.080]  She's afraid to...
[01:56:57.080 --> 01:56:59.080]  Okay, I got that.
[01:56:59.080 --> 01:57:02.080]  And I'm talking about how to fix it.
[01:57:02.080 --> 01:57:04.080]  Okay, I'm listening then.
[01:57:04.080 --> 01:57:07.080]  Don't try to fix it down here on the street.
[01:57:07.080 --> 01:57:10.080]  Listen, you're not going to fix it down here on the street.
[01:57:10.080 --> 01:57:14.080]  You're going to fix it at state government.
[01:57:14.080 --> 01:57:16.080]  And you're going to...
[01:57:16.080 --> 01:57:22.080]  Okay, if you don't want to take any risk of anyone getting upset at you,
[01:57:22.080 --> 01:57:24.080]  deal with it, just accept it.
[01:57:24.080 --> 01:57:26.080]  I don't know any other thing.
[01:57:26.080 --> 01:57:28.080]  Well, no, no, it's not that, Randy.
[01:57:28.080 --> 01:57:31.080]  Listen, listen, it's not that I'm afraid for myself.
[01:57:31.080 --> 01:57:33.080]  I can handle myself.
[01:57:33.080 --> 01:57:34.080]  I got that part.
[01:57:34.080 --> 01:57:35.080]  You're afraid for her.
[01:57:35.080 --> 01:57:36.080]  I got that part.
[01:57:36.080 --> 01:57:38.080]  What difference does it make?
[01:57:38.080 --> 01:57:41.080]  You're going to wait till they kill her?
[01:57:41.080 --> 01:57:45.080]  Or are you going to do something about it and they might object?
[01:57:45.080 --> 01:57:48.080]  No, no, no, listen, listen, please, please.
[01:57:48.080 --> 01:57:53.080]  I'm afraid of turning this town into a powder cake.
[01:57:53.080 --> 01:57:55.080]  That's what I'm afraid of.
[01:57:55.080 --> 01:57:57.080]  What's your alternative?
[01:57:57.080 --> 01:57:58.080]  Believe me.
[01:57:58.080 --> 01:58:00.080]  What's your alternative?
[01:58:00.080 --> 01:58:01.080]  Move.
[01:58:01.080 --> 01:58:04.080]  Do you have a remedy?
[01:58:04.080 --> 01:58:05.080]  Do I have a remedy?
[01:58:05.080 --> 01:58:06.080]  No, I don't.
[01:58:06.080 --> 01:58:09.080]  And I'm listening to you very carefully.
[01:58:09.080 --> 01:58:11.080]  My remedy is in the law.
[01:58:11.080 --> 01:58:17.080]  And if the town is a powder cake, you can't turn it into something else.
[01:58:17.080 --> 01:58:25.080]  What you can do is do something to get the police to have to pay attention to what is right.
[01:58:25.080 --> 01:58:32.080]  If the town is a powder cake, it's because the police have no moral center.
[01:58:32.080 --> 01:58:36.080]  How do you return moral center to the police?
[01:58:36.080 --> 01:58:45.080]  Well, it's just like the kid who steals a nickel candy bar today and tomorrow it's a dollar candy bar and then the next time it's armed.
[01:58:45.080 --> 01:58:46.080]  Hang on.
[01:58:46.080 --> 01:58:47.080]  I'm about to go to break.
[01:58:47.080 --> 01:58:50.080]  Randy Cowden, we'll be right back.
[01:58:50.080 --> 01:58:58.080]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.080 --> 01:59:06.080]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.080 --> 01:59:09.080]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:09.080 --> 01:59:18.080]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.080 --> 01:59:28.080]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.080 --> 01:59:33.080]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.080 --> 01:59:48.080]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.080 --> 02:00:04.080]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.