ROL_2018-03-09_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:08.600]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:08.600 --> 00:17.080]  Markets for Wednesday, 7 March 2018 are trading with gold at $1,327.21 an ounce, silver $16.49
[00:17.080 --> 00:28.320]  an ounce, Texas Crude $62.60 a barrel, Bitcoins at $9,883.87, Ethereum $748.18, Bitcoin Cash
[00:28.320 --> 00:35.320]  $1,086.63, and finally Litecoins at $181.10 a crypto coin.
[00:35.320 --> 00:45.960]  Today in History, the year 1989, Iran and the United Kingdom break diplomatic relations after
[00:45.960 --> 00:55.080]  a fight over Simon Rushdie's controversial novel, The Cetanic Versus, Today in History.
[00:55.080 --> 01:00.280]  In recent news, President Trump's top economic advisor, Gary D. Cohn, stated yesterday Tuesday
[01:00.280 --> 01:04.800]  that he was indeed resigning, this after giving a heads up last week, that he was considering
[01:04.800 --> 01:10.040]  doing so if President Trump decided to follow through with his tariffs on imported aluminum
[01:10.040 --> 01:11.040]  and steel.
[01:11.040 --> 01:14.600]  Of course, with President Trump's announcement last week that he would indeed levy tariffs
[01:14.600 --> 01:19.440]  on aluminum and steel imports, the reason for Mr. Cohn's departure seems obvious for
[01:19.440 --> 01:23.680]  many, considering he was one of the lone vocal opponents of any such measures in the
[01:23.680 --> 01:27.900]  administration.
[01:27.900 --> 01:32.720]  According to a report by The Daily Mail, skeletal biology expert Richard Jantz, out of the University
[01:32.720 --> 01:37.280]  of Tennessee, believes he may have found the skeletal remains of Amelia Earhart on a Pacific
[01:37.280 --> 01:38.280]  island.
[01:38.280 --> 01:43.000]  Amelia went missing in 1937 when her plane and navigator, Fred Union, were never to
[01:43.000 --> 01:44.000]  be found.
[01:44.000 --> 01:48.840]  At least until now, Richard Jantz stated that, what I can say scientifically is that they,
[01:48.840 --> 01:53.200]  the recent Pacific island remains, are 99% likely to be hers.
[01:53.200 --> 01:56.640]  There has been timing for this finding to be released, considering that the 1932 Hudson
[01:56.640 --> 02:01.680]  Essex Terraplane, which once belonged to Earhart, was reportedly stolen on Friday, February
[02:01.680 --> 02:08.080]  23, 2018, only to be found three days later on the street corner in the Sereno neighborhood
[02:08.080 --> 02:13.640]  in LA.
[02:13.640 --> 02:18.240]  The crypto market took a big blow today, Wednesday, with the top 10 currencies suffering 5-10%
[02:18.240 --> 02:19.240]  losses.
[02:19.240 --> 02:22.000]  This downturn right after the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it would
[02:22.000 --> 02:26.080]  be requiring digital asset exchanges to register with them.
[02:26.080 --> 02:30.240]  According to the SEC statement, quote, if a platform offers trading of digital assets
[02:30.240 --> 02:35.120]  that are securities and operates as an exchange as defined by the federal securities laws,
[02:35.120 --> 02:40.520]  then the platform must register with the SEC as a national securities exchange or be exempt
[02:40.520 --> 02:43.520]  from registration.
[02:43.520 --> 02:57.920]  This was Rick Rody with your lowdown for March 7th, 2018.
[03:13.520 --> 03:34.160]  I received my remedy today, came in a box just like the state, I accepted it for value
[03:34.160 --> 03:39.680]  right away, it's not too young, not later, we are originators and the pathway seems to
[03:39.680 --> 03:40.680]  get straighter everyday.
[03:40.680 --> 03:54.160]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton with our radio and we're talking to John in New York,
[03:54.160 --> 03:59.360]  okay, am I making sense so far, John?
[03:59.360 --> 04:07.960]  Perfect, what bad things did the bank do that's going to be very good for Virginia?
[04:07.960 --> 04:16.520]  Well, first thing we do is look at all of the documents filed in the public record and
[04:16.520 --> 04:28.560]  see if the chain of holder status all fits together from the public record.
[04:28.560 --> 04:29.960]  Did the lender go out of business?
[04:29.960 --> 04:40.080]  Did any one of these entities claiming to hold the mortgage, did any of them go out
[04:40.080 --> 04:46.000]  of business before their claim was transferred to someone else?
[04:46.000 --> 05:01.760]  And is the person who signed the assignment, a proper agent, do they have a power of attorney
[05:01.760 --> 05:02.760]  for MERS?
[05:02.760 --> 05:09.240]  Where MERS does the assignment, is there evidence in the public record that the person who signed
[05:09.240 --> 05:17.760]  this document had power of attorney for the holder?
[05:17.760 --> 05:23.000]  I've never seen it in the record, and then you go in and you ask them to prove up power
[05:23.000 --> 05:29.960]  of attorney, if they can't, then you ask the court to rule that this filing was filed
[05:29.960 --> 05:36.080]  by someone who did not have standing or the legal capacity to file and has a court rule
[05:36.080 --> 05:38.760]  that is for it.
[05:38.760 --> 05:43.800]  If they don't rule that it's for it, they're essentially saying anybody can make up this
[05:43.800 --> 05:45.480]  document and file it.
[05:45.480 --> 05:52.160]  It doesn't make any difference if they have authority to do it or not.
[05:52.160 --> 05:56.840]  That would make for a curious outcome.
[05:56.840 --> 06:01.680]  So you want to ask a question that they're going to want to give you a positive answer
[06:01.680 --> 06:06.800]  to, otherwise they destabilize their whole system.
[06:06.800 --> 06:12.040]  You need it to be simple, and this is really simple and straightforward.
[06:12.040 --> 06:17.680]  So I have to go down, and that's why I ask for all of these documents in a certain format
[06:17.680 --> 06:21.400]  so that I can go down them chronologically and see how they fit together.
[06:21.400 --> 06:28.640]  Once they're organized using this naming convention, I can go down the line of documents and tell
[06:28.640 --> 06:32.360]  if something's missing, tell if something's out of place.
[06:32.360 --> 06:37.720]  If I don't find anything out of place, then I want to take every signature on every document,
[06:37.720 --> 06:43.200]  send that person a request for evidence of power of attorney, and look in the record
[06:43.200 --> 06:51.120]  to see if there's a filing granting this person power of attorney to act for this other entity
[06:51.120 --> 06:55.840]  that claims to be the holder.
[06:55.840 --> 07:00.080]  Each one of us, I don't get a response back, then the presumption is they do not have power
[07:00.080 --> 07:09.840]  of attorney, and they do have a statutory judgment to rule that document void.
[07:09.840 --> 07:15.240]  None of them are going to be able to establish that they have power of attorney.
[07:15.240 --> 07:26.320]  For each notary that's in the record, you send a request for evidence of the acknowledgement.
[07:26.320 --> 07:37.680]  Not every state requires the notary to keep a logbook like Texas does, but every notary
[07:37.680 --> 07:44.240]  who gets paid for the notarizing documents must keep tax records, so you ask for the
[07:44.240 --> 07:45.240]  tax records.
[07:45.240 --> 07:49.440]  You're not going to get them.
[07:49.440 --> 07:55.320]  That gives you reasonable cause to believe that it doesn't exist, so you challenge the
[07:55.320 --> 07:57.320]  validity of the acknowledgement.
[07:57.320 --> 08:05.040]  The 13.001 says, and every other statute I've seen similar says the same thing, any document
[08:05.040 --> 08:12.120]  not properly acknowledged or proven, proven means two witnesses, then filed in the record.
[08:12.120 --> 08:19.680]  If you can undermine the acknowledgement, then you break down the whole chain of title.
[08:19.680 --> 08:24.320]  Okay, that sounds like fun so far.
[08:24.320 --> 08:28.080]  Yes, it does.
[08:28.080 --> 08:38.800]  So just pull all of our documents, name them with Virginia, space, year in numbers, dash,
[08:38.800 --> 08:44.640]  month in numbers, dash, day in numbers, space, what the document is.
[08:44.640 --> 08:50.200]  Then when you drop them in a folder, they all organize themselves in order, and then go
[08:50.200 --> 08:54.840]  from one to the next and see how they fit together.
[08:54.840 --> 08:58.040]  I find all kinds of mess in these.
[08:58.040 --> 09:06.960]  I find an assignment from one bank to another bank, and then I find an assignment from the
[09:06.960 --> 09:09.160]  first bank to a different bank.
[09:09.160 --> 09:17.120]  So wait a minute guys, you already assigned this to somebody, you don't hold it anymore.
[09:17.120 --> 09:23.640]  The second assignment has to be void, the declaratory judgment.
[09:23.640 --> 09:27.920]  You will not believe all the trash you find in these things, and once you have them organized
[09:27.920 --> 09:34.600]  by that naming principle, it's real easy to walk down them, and then if you can't find
[09:34.600 --> 09:41.560]  any obvious errors, and that occurs on occasion, then I go for a security supplement, because
[09:41.560 --> 09:48.520]  I want to come back and say, this document right here was filed by someone who, according
[09:48.520 --> 09:57.440]  to the security audit, did not have a claim against the property that they could transfer.
[09:57.440 --> 10:09.920]  I don't argue securities, I argue valid claims filed in the records, and you can spend five
[10:09.920 --> 10:12.920]  to six years just on that.
[10:12.920 --> 10:21.360]  Randy, Joe has said that the chain of title, I think it was Joe, and I think he said the
[10:21.360 --> 10:26.800]  chain of title in the public record did not match the chain of title for the endorsements
[10:26.800 --> 10:27.800]  to the note.
[10:27.800 --> 10:29.920]  Does that make sense to you?
[10:29.920 --> 10:30.920]  Yes.
[10:30.920 --> 10:40.240]  Okay, then another man by the name of Clay Cole, Clay Cole has told me that at least
[10:40.240 --> 10:47.400]  one of the assignments is wrong, and he says he's not sure that the second one is wrong
[10:47.400 --> 10:49.040]  or the third one is wrong.
[10:49.040 --> 10:55.240]  He said it depends on such and such and such and such, and the second one is wrong.
[10:55.240 --> 10:57.920]  Okay, that's why I need them all in order.
[10:57.920 --> 10:58.920]  Okay.
[10:58.920 --> 11:04.120]  If I have them all laid out in order, it'd be really easy to tell which one of those
[11:04.120 --> 11:06.320]  is out of place.
[11:06.320 --> 11:07.400]  I did send them.
[11:07.400 --> 11:08.400]  I sent them.
[11:08.400 --> 11:10.680]  I enumerated them as you wanted.
[11:10.680 --> 11:11.680]  Okay.
[11:11.680 --> 11:13.040]  I hope you got them.
[11:13.040 --> 11:15.000]  I hope you got them.
[11:15.000 --> 11:16.000]  I got a package.
[11:16.000 --> 11:19.160]  No, I got a package from someone else today.
[11:19.160 --> 11:23.960]  I hope you appreciate that I get a lot of this stuff.
[11:23.960 --> 11:31.560]  So getting to this, I just had somebody send me a whole stack of documents and did not
[11:31.560 --> 11:40.320]  give me the naming convention on them, sent me some documents, that one page per email,
[11:40.320 --> 11:45.160]  and had about 50 documents, and I told them there was absolutely no way I'm going to spend
[11:45.160 --> 11:52.320]  half a day figuring out what all this is, not even going to open the first document.
[11:52.320 --> 11:53.320]  Okay.
[11:53.320 --> 11:56.880]  I haven't got to yours yet.
[11:56.880 --> 12:02.640]  I am in the final stages of finishing up a ten-year project.
[12:02.640 --> 12:06.040]  So I'm really jammed for time.
[12:06.040 --> 12:07.800]  Have you looked at them?
[12:07.800 --> 12:08.800]  Yes.
[12:08.800 --> 12:10.320]  Now, Randy, let me explain.
[12:10.320 --> 12:11.320]  Let me explain.
[12:11.320 --> 12:12.320]  Give me a second.
[12:12.320 --> 12:16.360]  I sent them to you 10 pages.
[12:16.360 --> 12:17.360]  Let me finish.
[12:17.360 --> 12:25.440]  I sent them to you 10 pages per email, and that was 13 email, then I found a better way
[12:25.440 --> 12:26.440]  to do it.
[12:26.440 --> 12:34.840]  Joe suggested I go to we something or other, and I assembled them in a zip file the way
[12:34.840 --> 12:36.440]  you want it.
[12:36.440 --> 12:42.600]  I did not include her name, but I included the date, the way that'll work.
[12:42.600 --> 12:43.600]  Yep.
[12:43.600 --> 12:44.840]  So you should have it.
[12:44.840 --> 12:45.840]  Okay.
[12:45.840 --> 12:55.000]  I'm not that, but I am real reluctant because I have to go sign up to whatever that is.
[12:55.000 --> 12:57.000]  No, it's free.
[12:57.000 --> 13:04.040]  It may be free, but they're going to want my information, and then I wind up with ten
[13:04.040 --> 13:09.280]  emails a day from, they take my name because it's free.
[13:09.280 --> 13:12.840]  The way they make their money is they take my name and they sell it to everybody.
[13:12.840 --> 13:20.600]  I did about 100 emails a day, and every time I sign up for something like this, that increases.
[13:20.600 --> 13:23.840]  So I was really reluctant to sign up to that.
[13:23.840 --> 13:25.840]  Do you have Skype?
[13:25.840 --> 13:29.680]  No, but I suppose I can get it.
[13:29.680 --> 13:30.680]  It's free.
[13:30.680 --> 13:32.480]  It's a free download.
[13:32.480 --> 13:34.560]  You take that zip file, drop it in Skype.
[13:34.560 --> 13:36.280]  It comes directly to me.
[13:36.280 --> 13:38.280]  Skype is great.
[13:38.280 --> 13:40.280]  What's your name?
[13:40.280 --> 13:42.280]  What's your name in Skype?
[13:42.280 --> 13:43.280]  Rule Dude.
[13:43.280 --> 13:44.280]  A rule of law.
[13:44.280 --> 13:47.280]  Do you look up Rule of Law Radio?
[13:47.280 --> 13:53.560]  No, tell me what's your handle in Skype?
[13:53.560 --> 13:54.560]  Rule Dude.
[13:54.560 --> 13:55.560]  Rule Dude.
[13:55.560 --> 13:56.560]  Yeah, Deborah did that.
[13:56.560 --> 14:03.760]  I never liked that, but I got stuck with it.
[14:03.760 --> 14:06.000]  Is that one word, Randy?
[14:06.000 --> 14:07.000]  Yes.
[14:07.000 --> 14:09.000]  And that's it.
[14:09.000 --> 14:11.000]  Rule Dude is the best.
[14:11.000 --> 14:12.000]  That's it.
[14:12.000 --> 14:13.000]  Okay.
[14:13.000 --> 14:14.000]  R-U-L-E-D-U-D-E.
[14:14.000 --> 14:17.000]  And that's in Skype.
[14:17.000 --> 14:18.000]  Yes.
[14:18.000 --> 14:23.000]  So if I put Rule Dude, Skype will know exactly who to go to.
[14:23.000 --> 14:24.000]  I'm sure.
[14:24.000 --> 14:26.000]  You just do a search for Rule Dude.
[14:26.000 --> 14:27.000]  He'll find me.
[14:27.000 --> 14:32.000]  And then it'll ask you to send me a contact request.
[14:32.000 --> 14:33.000]  Right.
[14:33.000 --> 14:36.000]  Did that part about quick call make sense?
[14:36.000 --> 14:44.000]  He told me that at least one of the assignments is wrong and depending on a set of facts,
[14:44.000 --> 14:47.000]  it could be either the second one or the third one.
[14:47.000 --> 14:48.000]  Okay, okay.
[14:48.000 --> 14:49.000]  I got that.
[14:49.000 --> 14:52.000]  And when I get them out, look at it.
[14:52.000 --> 14:59.000]  I called the clerk's office and she gave me verbatim what those three assignments were
[14:59.000 --> 15:05.000]  and I copied them down word for word for what the county clerk gave them to me as.
[15:05.000 --> 15:06.000]  No, no, no.
[15:06.000 --> 15:08.000]  I need a copy of the assignments.
[15:08.000 --> 15:10.000]  No, no, I know.
[15:10.000 --> 15:13.000]  But that wouldn't be helpful at all.
[15:13.000 --> 15:14.000]  No, no.
[15:14.000 --> 15:15.000]  I need to see the assignment.
[15:15.000 --> 15:18.000]  I want to see the date it was actually filed.
[15:18.000 --> 15:22.000]  I want to see the date on the document itself of when it was actually created.
[15:22.000 --> 15:25.000]  I want to see the date of the acknowledgement.
[15:25.000 --> 15:35.000]  I want to see who the person is who signed it, who the notary is.
[15:35.000 --> 15:37.000]  I want to see the notary seal.
[15:37.000 --> 15:38.000]  Make sure it's valid.
[15:38.000 --> 15:46.000]  Make sure the state for the notary matches the state and county of the acknowledgement
[15:46.000 --> 15:48.000]  to the whole bunch of stuff I look at.
[15:48.000 --> 15:49.000]  Right.
[15:49.000 --> 15:52.000]  I know what verbatim is what comes into that.
[15:52.000 --> 15:55.000]  All right.
[15:55.000 --> 15:56.000]  So I'm very clear.
[15:56.000 --> 15:58.000]  So I'm very clear to make sure I did it right.
[15:58.000 --> 16:02.000]  I did not include her name on the document.
[16:02.000 --> 16:07.000]  But what I did do is, for example, this year is 2018.
[16:07.000 --> 16:18.000]  And if the document was dated March 1st, I put 2018 space 03 space 01.
[16:18.000 --> 16:20.000]  Okay, that'll work.
[16:20.000 --> 16:21.000]  Okay.
[16:21.000 --> 16:26.000]  Then did you put a description of what it was, a descriptive name?
[16:26.000 --> 16:27.000]  What I thought it was.
[16:27.000 --> 16:29.000]  What I thought it was.
[16:29.000 --> 16:30.000]  That's good enough.
[16:30.000 --> 16:31.000]  That's good enough.
[16:31.000 --> 16:34.000]  Just, okay, that'll work.
[16:34.000 --> 16:42.000]  That way I can open it up and I can go right down it and very quickly do a cursory analysis
[16:42.000 --> 16:47.000]  and let you know if it's, I charge to do a full analysis because that's time consuming.
[16:47.000 --> 16:51.000]  But I can look at it quickly and tell you if it's worth it to have me do that.
[16:51.000 --> 16:52.000]  Hang on.
[16:52.000 --> 16:53.000]  We're about to go to break.
[16:53.000 --> 17:21.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:21.000 --> 17:27.000]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:27.000 --> 17:33.000]  I click control, shift, delete and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:33.000 --> 17:34.000]  Bye bye yucky cookies.
[17:34.000 --> 17:41.000]  Now I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand side.
[17:41.000 --> 17:47.000]  Bookmark the link and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[17:47.000 --> 17:48.000]  No cookies?
[17:48.000 --> 17:49.000]  Or me?
[17:49.000 --> 17:51.000]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:51.000 --> 17:57.000]  And every time I order on Amazon I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[17:57.000 --> 17:58.000]  These are cookies.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  These are classified.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:25.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons.
[18:25.000 --> 18:27.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner.
[18:47.000 --> 18:49.000]  Or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 18:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.000 --> 19:18.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors' nets.
[19:18.000 --> 19:20.000]  Okay, we are back.
[19:20.000 --> 19:25.000]  Randy Kelton on the rule of law radio and we're talking to John in New York.
[19:25.000 --> 19:34.000]  Okay, since I have that, if you've sent it to me in the zip file just drop it into Skype.
[19:34.000 --> 19:39.000]  That way I can download it and I don't have to sign up for all these strange things.
[19:39.000 --> 19:43.000]  It's in the stacks of advertisements.
[19:43.000 --> 19:45.000]  I got advertisements for stuff.
[19:45.000 --> 19:47.000]  I have no idea where it comes from.
[19:47.000 --> 19:52.000]  Every time I sign up for stuff, it increases.
[19:52.000 --> 19:55.000]  It's part of how these guys make their money.
[19:55.000 --> 19:57.000]  Anyway, I don't mean to be difficult.
[19:57.000 --> 19:59.000]  I get a lot of this stuff.
[19:59.000 --> 20:03.000]  I will try to look at it this weekend.
[20:03.000 --> 20:13.000]  Since the mortgage company asked her if she wanted to rent, that's a good sign that they don't want to evict her.
[20:13.000 --> 20:17.000]  They want to keep the property occupied.
[20:17.000 --> 20:22.000]  If they evict her, their insurance goes up dramatically.
[20:22.000 --> 20:26.000]  It's to their advantage to keep someone in the property.
[20:26.000 --> 20:32.000]  Now that gives her time to file a declaratory judgment.
[20:32.000 --> 20:36.000]  You only do them one at a time.
[20:36.000 --> 20:41.000]  It takes any one of those you can take three or four years with.
[20:41.000 --> 20:43.000]  Maybe five years.
[20:43.000 --> 20:50.000]  You run it all the way up to the Supreme.
[20:50.000 --> 20:58.000]  Okay, now because I dated each page, all I do, they're going to have to explain to me, how do I zip it and put it in a file?
[20:58.000 --> 21:00.000]  That part I really don't know.
[21:00.000 --> 21:05.000]  You just select all the files and add to archive.
[21:05.000 --> 21:13.000]  You just click like a seven zip and then it has add to archive.
[21:13.000 --> 21:21.000]  You select all the, it'll give you a browse and you can browse to the files, select them all, add to archive and then zip them up.
[21:21.000 --> 21:23.000]  I have no idea what that is.
[21:23.000 --> 21:25.000]  It's just like click on icon.
[21:25.000 --> 21:28.000]  Okay, you'll have to read some of this.
[21:28.000 --> 21:36.000]  You can download a seven zip, seven zip is one of the easiest ones.
[21:36.000 --> 21:40.000]  I'm opening Windows Explorer.
[21:40.000 --> 21:46.000]  Let's say I pick this box.
[21:46.000 --> 21:49.000]  I'm going to right click.
[21:49.000 --> 21:53.000]  Where is seven zip?
[21:53.000 --> 21:58.000]  You're going to have to say that again because I can't respond.
[21:58.000 --> 22:00.000]  Right click on a folder.
[22:00.000 --> 22:04.000]  You put all those files in one folder.
[22:04.000 --> 22:11.000]  Right click on the folder and you can go down to the zip utility.
[22:11.000 --> 22:16.000]  If I have seven zip is what I use.
[22:16.000 --> 22:18.000]  Where is zip utility?
[22:18.000 --> 22:23.000]  It's not on your computer if you haven't downloaded it.
[22:23.000 --> 22:26.000]  Okay, listen carefully.
[22:26.000 --> 22:29.000]  Right click on a folder.
[22:29.000 --> 22:32.000]  A box will come up.
[22:32.000 --> 22:36.000]  The zip utility will be listed in that box.
[22:36.000 --> 22:37.000]  Okay.
[22:37.000 --> 22:40.000]  So download seven zip.
[22:40.000 --> 22:42.000]  Install it.
[22:42.000 --> 22:44.000]  Open Windows Explorer.
[22:44.000 --> 22:47.000]  Your file manager.
[22:47.000 --> 22:51.000]  Take all of the files, put them in a folder.
[22:51.000 --> 22:57.000]  If you don't have a, if they're all in one big conglomeration,
[22:57.000 --> 23:02.000]  just right click on an empty space under the files.
[23:02.000 --> 23:08.000]  Go down to new, select folder and then create a new folder.
[23:08.000 --> 23:11.000]  Then select all the files.
[23:11.000 --> 23:15.000]  You click on one, hold the shift key and click on the rest of them.
[23:15.000 --> 23:21.000]  Or you can hold the right mouse button and drag and it'll highlight all the files.
[23:21.000 --> 23:26.000]  And you drag them, drop them in the folder.
[23:26.000 --> 23:31.000]  If you hit the left drag left button and hold,
[23:31.000 --> 23:37.000]  slide the cursor over the folder and release, it'll drop them in the folder.
[23:37.000 --> 23:42.000]  Then right click on the folder itself.
[23:42.000 --> 23:46.000]  And the zip utility will come up and tell it,
[23:46.000 --> 23:48.000]  tell it to add them all to archive.
[23:48.000 --> 23:56.000]  Actually, once you've loaded seven zip, then you can click add to archive.
[23:56.000 --> 24:02.000]  It pops up a box and let's see.
[24:02.000 --> 24:13.000]  Click a, that the end of the top of it will auto mixers.
[24:13.000 --> 24:19.000]  Whatever folder you clicked on when you open seven zip,
[24:19.000 --> 24:24.000]  it will look at that folder as the zip file.
[24:24.000 --> 24:29.000]  So take the files you want to zip, put them in a folder, give them a name.
[24:29.000 --> 24:34.000]  Then right click on the folder, select seven zip.
[24:34.000 --> 24:40.000]  Seven zip opens and at the first line I'll say,
[24:40.000 --> 24:44.000]  whatever the folder name is,.7z.
[24:44.000 --> 24:47.000]  You go all the way to the right and there's a box with three dots in it.
[24:47.000 --> 24:50.000]  You click on that and it opens up a box.
[24:50.000 --> 24:53.000]  You can select all your files.
[24:53.000 --> 25:00.000]  You select the whatever folder you intended and all the files inside that folder.
[25:00.000 --> 25:03.000]  You hit control A and it selects them all.
[25:03.000 --> 25:07.000]  Hit enter, drops them all in the archive.
[25:07.000 --> 25:15.000]  And it'll save it as a file named whatever the folder name is,.7z.
[25:15.000 --> 25:24.000]  You take that file and open Skype and in Skype,
[25:24.000 --> 25:29.000]  let me open it up to make sure I get it right.
[25:29.000 --> 25:35.000]  I've got three screens here and I forget to look at the third one.
[25:35.000 --> 25:40.000]  Okay, in Skype you click on like if you're going to send a message.
[25:40.000 --> 25:49.000]  And on the right hand side there's a little square page with the corner folded over.
[25:49.000 --> 25:53.000]  You click on that and that'll bring up a browse window.
[25:53.000 --> 25:57.000]  You browse to where the seven zip file is, click on it.
[25:57.000 --> 26:00.000]  It drops it into Skype and sends it.
[26:00.000 --> 26:05.000]  When you're ready to do that, call me and I will walk you through the process.
[26:05.000 --> 26:10.000]  All right, now I may be able to do it by going to one of the local libraries
[26:10.000 --> 26:15.000]  who have a computer genius on their staff.
[26:15.000 --> 26:19.000]  And we may be able to do this in a regular email and still do the same thing.
[26:19.000 --> 26:21.000]  Is that all right?
[26:21.000 --> 26:26.000]  Yes, the problem is when you try to send a zip file in email,
[26:26.000 --> 26:30.000]  email won't take a very big file.
[26:30.000 --> 26:35.000]  So it may tell you this file is too big to attach.
[26:35.000 --> 26:38.000]  Yeah, cut it in half.
[26:38.000 --> 26:43.000]  Yeah, that's a whole lot easier just to drop it into Skype.
[26:43.000 --> 26:46.000]  Skype doesn't care how big it is.
[26:46.000 --> 26:51.000]  If it's bigger, it just takes Skype longer to send it.
[26:51.000 --> 26:55.000]  That's why I use Skype for transferring big files.
[26:55.000 --> 26:58.000]  I don't have all this problem I have with email.
[26:58.000 --> 27:03.000]  Okay, I'll ask the computer genius at one of the libraries to help me do this with Skype.
[27:03.000 --> 27:05.000]  Yeah, he won't have any problem at all.
[27:05.000 --> 27:07.000]  He'll know how to do that.
[27:07.000 --> 27:09.000]  Okay.
[27:09.000 --> 27:12.000]  Boy, I want to thank you very kindly.
[27:12.000 --> 27:15.000]  Okay, you are welcome and get that to me.
[27:15.000 --> 27:17.000]  I'll have a look at it.
[27:17.000 --> 27:21.000]  Okay, so you do think that there are boo-boos?
[27:21.000 --> 27:24.000]  Did you see any boo-boos that the bank made?
[27:24.000 --> 27:29.000]  From what you told me, I'm relatively certain it's going to be.
[27:29.000 --> 27:35.000]  In a mortgage that's 2005 or sooner, I always find a mess in them.
[27:35.000 --> 27:38.000]  Yeah, it's 2006, yeah.
[27:38.000 --> 27:41.000]  So I'm almost certain to find a mess in them.
[27:41.000 --> 27:45.000]  It's very rare that I don't find them messed up.
[27:45.000 --> 27:46.000]  Right.
[27:46.000 --> 27:53.000]  2010 and after they began to get things together and do a better job.
[27:53.000 --> 27:59.000]  But even after the crash, it took them a couple of years to get things straightened out.
[27:59.000 --> 28:01.000]  Okay.
[28:01.000 --> 28:02.000]  Yep.
[28:02.000 --> 28:11.000]  So get that to me and we'll talk this week and send me an email and I'll send you my phone number and we can talk.
[28:11.000 --> 28:13.000]  Well, thank you very kindly, Randy.
[28:13.000 --> 28:14.000]  I want to thank you.
[28:14.000 --> 28:16.000]  Okay, and thank you.
[28:16.000 --> 28:21.000]  And now we're going to go to Ramadan in Arizona.
[28:21.000 --> 28:24.000]  Hello.
[28:24.000 --> 28:25.000]  Are you there Ramadan?
[28:25.000 --> 28:26.000]  How are you doing?
[28:26.000 --> 28:29.000]  Yeah, I'm just taking off my speakerphone.
[28:29.000 --> 28:31.000]  How are you Ms. Kota?
[28:31.000 --> 28:32.000]  I am good.
[28:32.000 --> 28:36.000]  What do you have for us today?
[28:36.000 --> 28:37.000]  Okay.
[28:37.000 --> 28:46.000]  The last time I talked to you, I was talking about a quote over by an unmarked car in here in Scottsdale, Arizona.
[28:46.000 --> 28:57.000]  And I was appealing to a superior court and I got the ruling and they basically, this judge was just as ignorant as the first one.
[28:57.000 --> 29:01.000]  Well, maybe just a tad bit of more intellect.
[29:01.000 --> 29:05.000]  Like the first judge didn't mention anything at all about the unmarked car.
[29:05.000 --> 29:10.000]  They didn't mention anything about what I said, no contention, nothing whatsoever.
[29:10.000 --> 29:21.000]  So this judge basically took my words and mixed them around saying that because in trial, the officer had called the car a semi-marked vehicle.
[29:21.000 --> 29:29.000]  And I made him explain of what it is, including the officer testifying that it doesn't contain any decals on it.
[29:29.000 --> 29:36.000]  So this judge just said, well, in this statute, is that the music?
[29:36.000 --> 29:42.000]  Yeah, the music. But I'll get to you on the other side, I guess, if you have time.
[29:42.000 --> 30:11.000]  In Africa, there's a tiny rat that would make a tasty snack for jackals and wild cats, but they won't touch him with a 10-foot pole.
[30:11.000 --> 30:15.000]  Take a cap for an Albright and after the break, I'll tell you what his secret weapon is.
[30:42.000 --> 30:52.000]  In Northeastern Africa, tiny creatures called crested rats can walk safely among the most voracious predators.
[30:52.000 --> 30:56.000]  They're slow and easy to catch and apparently very appetizing.
[30:56.000 --> 30:57.000]  So how do they survive?
[30:57.000 --> 31:05.000]  With one of the most ingenious defenses in the animal kingdom, they chew the roots and bark of a toxic plant called the acocanthera tree,
[31:05.000 --> 31:08.000]  then rub the saliva on a row of quills down their backs.
[31:08.000 --> 31:11.000]  When an enemy approaches, they expose their flanks invitingly.
[31:11.000 --> 31:17.000]  Predators either smell the poison in bolts or take a bite and soon fall dead from heart failure.
[31:17.000 --> 31:23.000]  The toxin you see comes from the poison aero tree, the same one hunters once used to kill elephants.
[31:23.000 --> 31:49.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:53.000 --> 32:00.000]  For more information, visit our website at 4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at thisusa.org.
[32:23.000 --> 32:35.000]  For more information, visit our website at 4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at thisusa.org.
[32:54.000 --> 33:01.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[33:01.000 --> 33:27.000]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:31.000 --> 33:41.000]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[34:02.000 --> 34:14.000]  Okay, I'm talking about what the judge was manipulating in my contention about the MR vehicle,
[34:14.000 --> 34:19.000]  because that actually was kind of like my only fight and my strongest fight.
[34:19.000 --> 34:28.000]  It was my strongest fight because I wanted to get this severed from the beginning with lack of lawful authority.
[34:28.000 --> 34:45.000]  The appeals judge had just said that there is no language that we see where a semi-marked vehicle is not illegal.
[34:45.000 --> 34:49.000]  I'm like, well, that's not the point.
[34:49.000 --> 34:53.000]  The statute talked about the designations of it.
[34:53.000 --> 34:58.000]  And so that was like really kind of like kind of a run-on.
[34:58.000 --> 35:01.000]  That was just like, well, this is the strongest fight.
[35:01.000 --> 35:04.000]  Now, hold on. That's the strongest fight.
[35:04.000 --> 35:18.000]  You're in Arizona. Have you looked at the transportation code for Arizona to see who is statutorily authorized to enforce the code?
[35:18.000 --> 35:25.000]  Well, I think... Hold on. Let me explain why this is important.
[35:25.000 --> 35:31.000]  Truman, before he became president, was a road builder.
[35:31.000 --> 35:37.000]  And when he got to presidency, he was appalled at how many people were dying on the roads.
[35:37.000 --> 35:40.000]  And this is back in the late 40s.
[35:40.000 --> 35:45.000]  There weren't anywhere nearer the kinds of cars on the roads than there are now,
[35:45.000 --> 35:49.000]  but they were losing 50,000 people a year.
[35:49.000 --> 36:01.000]  And his big concern was that they were building roads with the same style and strategy they built roads for horse and bugies with.
[36:01.000 --> 36:10.000]  And now you've got 6,000 pounds of iron cruising down the highway at 60, 70 miles an hour.
[36:10.000 --> 36:20.000]  And back in those days, they really had lead slits. And they were just beginning to build large trucks, and the trucks were a mess.
[36:20.000 --> 36:22.000]  And they were killing people everywhere.
[36:22.000 --> 36:32.000]  So Truman had the interstate highway systems designed with the on-ramps and off-ramps.
[36:32.000 --> 36:46.000]  And then he had the feds put together a model transportation code and asked all of the states to adopt it, and they did.
[36:46.000 --> 36:55.000]  And in the states took that new transportation code to the sheriff and told the sheriff to enforce it.
[36:55.000 --> 36:58.000]  The sheriff told him to go scratch.
[36:58.000 --> 37:01.000]  He didn't have the funds to enforce that new code.
[37:01.000 --> 37:07.000]  So you guys need to either get me funding or come up with some other solution.
[37:07.000 --> 37:13.000]  So the states came up with another solution. They created state police.
[37:13.000 --> 37:26.000]  All of the state police were created for the purpose of enforcing the commercial transportation code. All of them.
[37:26.000 --> 37:34.000]  Yeah. And the sheriff, he is the main law enforcement official for the county.
[37:34.000 --> 37:42.000]  So the sheriff said, don't you send those trumps in here to enforce the penal laws? That's my job.
[37:42.000 --> 37:47.000]  You want to send them in here to enforce the transportation code? We don't care.
[37:47.000 --> 38:00.000]  In Texas, the statute says the Department of Public Safety shall not enforce the criminal laws except at the request of and under the direction of local law enforcement.
[38:00.000 --> 38:13.000]  Because that went to a preemption doctrine. Our founders intended that each county have its own law enforcement so that the state didn't control everybody.
[38:13.000 --> 38:23.000]  The state is broken up into separate political entities. You can't hardly corral the people when you've got all these separate sheriffs with their own authority.
[38:23.000 --> 38:28.000]  And the sheriffs were concerned that the state would come in and preempt all of them.
[38:28.000 --> 38:37.000]  So for the most part, the highway patrol is the traffic enforcement arm.
[38:37.000 --> 38:46.000]  Police are the penal law enforcement arm. Is that making this make more sense now?
[38:46.000 --> 38:50.000]  Yes, it actually does make a lot of sense.
[38:50.000 --> 39:06.000]  That's what you want to look for. Where did peace officers who are empowered to enforce the penal laws get to cross over into enforcing a professional conduct?
[39:06.000 --> 39:16.000]  Now, I know how they actually did it. They just started doing it. But statutorily, how did they do it?
[39:16.000 --> 39:27.000]  In Texas, there were some counties where it wasn't feasible for the highway patrol to put people there because they were so sparsely populated.
[39:27.000 --> 39:38.000]  So they authorized the county commissioner's court to appoint up to five deputies if the county had less than two million people in it.
[39:38.000 --> 39:46.000]  But the county commissioner's court had to pay them. They had to be sheriff's deputies first and certified.
[39:46.000 --> 39:58.000]  But they could enforce traffic if the county commissioner's court paid them, so that didn't come out of the sheriff's budget. And they had to ride motorcycles.
[39:58.000 --> 40:07.000]  There's nothing in Texas code that authorizes a municipal police department to enforce nothing.
[40:07.000 --> 40:27.000]  Well, they used the peace officers to enforce it. Well, Pierre in our statutes in the title 28 of transportation says, the Department of Transportation has jurisdiction.
[40:27.000 --> 40:37.000]  Is there any place that gives peace officers jurisdiction to enforce the transportation code?
[40:37.000 --> 40:48.000]  This is what you look for in Illinois. In Illinois, the state police are called the secretary of state police.
[40:48.000 --> 40:59.000]  And the code says, only the secretary of state may enforce the traffic laws.
[40:59.000 --> 41:10.000]  So there's other states that's similar. Now, Georgia, there's code that authorizes peace officers to enforce.
[41:10.000 --> 41:21.000]  And we've got a way to deal with that. But see what it says in Arizona. If you find that in Arizona, peace officers are authorized to enforce the commercial transportation code.
[41:21.000 --> 41:37.000]  Then go back and look at your original complaint. Does the original complaint establish that you fell within the statutory scheme?
[41:37.000 --> 41:54.000]  Now, I'm a pilot. If I'm not pushing my lawnmower, I can't be giving a ticket under my pilot's license. I got one, but I'm not using it.
[41:54.000 --> 42:04.000]  So transportation code only applies to commercial drivers. It's that way in every state.
[42:04.000 --> 42:17.000]  Now, there's a real good case, a read out of Tennessee, a Bonner case, about the authority of the state to license drivers.
[42:17.000 --> 42:46.000]  And what it says is, is that the state has an inherent interest in the safety of the public. And they can require that any driver get a driver's license for the purpose of ensuring competence in operating a vehicle and knowledge of the rules of the road.
[42:46.000 --> 43:02.000]  But nothing says that the transportation code can be enforced against them. They have to get the license just to make sure that they know enough to be safe.
[43:02.000 --> 43:10.000]  But nothing authorizes them to be treated as if they're always acting under the authority of that license.
[43:10.000 --> 43:28.000]  So look at this in Arizona, see what you find. And then if you do find that they can enforce, even if the police can enforce, then look at the ticket and does it include the elements of commerce?
[43:28.000 --> 43:47.000]  Arizona has been very tricky on a lot of things that they do. But yeah, I do see it. And I see it exactly as it says, it's a regular peace officer with like authority of other peace officers of the state or cities and towns of the state.
[43:47.000 --> 44:01.000]  Hang on, we'll have to go to break Randy Kelton with our radio. We'll be right back.
[44:01.000 --> 44:19.000]  At Capital Coin and Boolean, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[44:19.000 --> 44:32.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[44:32.000 --> 44:43.000]  We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. We brok for metals IRA accounts and we also accept big coins as payment.
[44:43.000 --> 44:54.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday at 10-6, Saturday at 10-2.
[44:54.000 --> 45:15.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:28.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:43.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 46:01.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner. Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:13.000 --> 46:40.000]  Always I must be careful what I'm wishing for. When I'm hungry I like to know just what I'm fishing for. I ain't asking for much. I ain't trying to be no glutton.
[46:40.000 --> 46:45.000]  I'm just here makin' my livin' pushin' button
[46:45.000 --> 46:52.000]  I gave my message out to anyone in the shoutin' distance
[46:52.000 --> 46:56.000]  Hope for bravery and they can't slave
[46:56.000 --> 47:00.000]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton with Rule of Law Radio
[47:00.000 --> 47:04.000]  And we're talkin' to Ramadan in Arizona
[47:04.000 --> 47:09.000]  Okay, Ramadan, if I seem like I'm being pedantic or kind of pushin' you
[47:09.000 --> 47:15.000]  In the process of talking about this, I'm trying to go over these issues
[47:15.000 --> 47:19.000]  So I bring everybody up to speed
[47:19.000 --> 47:21.000]  I understand
[47:21.000 --> 47:28.000]  It's been kind of like a spin cycle, kind of confusing, trying to understand it
[47:28.000 --> 47:36.000]  But the statutes, I believe the statutes does give the local law enforcement and found political subdivisions
[47:36.000 --> 47:40.000]  The authority to enforce the transportation title
[47:40.000 --> 47:53.000]  At least they've been delegated authority through the intergovernmental agreement
[47:53.000 --> 48:00.000]  And yes, the Department of Transportation, they're the ones that have the authority to enforce the transportation code
[48:00.000 --> 48:05.000]  We have out here Arizona Department of Public Safety
[48:05.000 --> 48:12.000]  Then we have the sheriff and then the local political subdivision
[48:12.000 --> 48:23.000]  I didn't go that route because it was just too, like now, right now, it's been too confusing to try to understand at the moment
[48:23.000 --> 48:28.000]  I haven't given up, I just, I don't have to go to something more concrete
[48:28.000 --> 48:32.000]  And now for me, it was on my car and it's got lucky
[48:32.000 --> 48:37.000]  But they're ignoring the laws, the judges are just ignoring it, so I appealed it
[48:37.000 --> 48:43.000]  Actually, about a few days ago, sometime last week I went back for remand sentencing
[48:43.000 --> 48:53.000]  And I put into the record that I had entered the notice of appeal to the Arizona Court of Appeal
[48:53.000 --> 49:05.000]  And the prosecutor was just saying some garbage about I don't have the right to an appeal because I didn't petition for a special action
[49:05.000 --> 49:11.000]  And at first I thought he was right, but then again I had to remember that they played a lot of tricks
[49:11.000 --> 49:18.000]  And I don't know, is he right?
[49:18.000 --> 49:21.000]  Randy?
[49:21.000 --> 49:33.000]  I'm not sure, that would be specific to Arizona, but in most states you have to give notice of an intent to appeal
[49:33.000 --> 49:45.000]  Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, I did give the notice of appeal, I put it in the court, I cited the criminal procedure and the statute
[49:45.000 --> 49:50.000]  They give the authority, they give me the right to an appeal
[49:50.000 --> 49:55.000]  Okay, let me explain right to an appeal
[49:55.000 --> 50:04.000]  You don't have a right to file an appeal, but you don't have a right to an appeal
[50:04.000 --> 50:15.000]  The court, the appellate court can decide whether or not to pick up your appeal, or just like the supreme, they can refuse to pick it up
[50:15.000 --> 50:19.000]  Just a fine point in case it comes up
[50:19.000 --> 50:24.000]  You do have a right to file for an appeal though
[50:24.000 --> 50:27.000]  What was it the lawyer said you had to have?
[50:27.000 --> 50:34.000]  A special act, I didn't file a petition for a special action
[50:34.000 --> 50:38.000]  Did you look up special action?
[50:38.000 --> 50:44.000]  I tried to, but it was giving me the rigmaroo, I couldn't really understand it
[50:44.000 --> 50:54.000]  I know he purposely cited, or maybe he did my mistake of an unknown case law, I mean not a case law, but a statute that doesn't exist
[50:54.000 --> 51:03.000]  But he did say that, well the defense doesn't have the right to appeal, you know, pending that, but we'll let the court of appeals tell him that
[51:03.000 --> 51:07.000]  And he was kind of telling that to the judge, and the judge was like agreeing
[51:07.000 --> 51:11.000]  I was like, well yeah, he doesn't have to have court of appeals, we'll let him know that
[51:11.000 --> 51:15.000]  But I thought he was trying to trick me, maybe he is right to some degree
[51:15.000 --> 51:17.000]  Okay, hold on, hold on
[51:17.000 --> 51:24.000]  A special action is the name Arizona gives for the traditional rits of certiori
[51:24.000 --> 51:27.000]  Mandamus and prohibition
[51:27.000 --> 51:32.000]  Special actions can be brought in superior court or in appellate court
[51:32.000 --> 51:39.000]  Appellate action relief is not available when there is an adequate remedy by appeal
[51:39.000 --> 51:45.000]  This doesn't look like, it's not an appeal, it's a separate issue
[51:45.000 --> 51:49.000]  And it's a special action different from appeal
[51:49.000 --> 51:56.000]  Special action is the name Arizona gives for the traditional rits of certiori
[51:56.000 --> 52:00.000]  And prohibition special actions can be brought in, that's the same thing
[52:00.000 --> 52:07.000]  Appellate special action itself is not available when there is an adequate remedy by appeal
[52:07.000 --> 52:11.000]  Only certain questions can be raised in a special action
[52:11.000 --> 52:16.000]  Such as whether the respondent has proceeded without legal authority
[52:16.000 --> 52:22.000]  As a result, the great majority of special actions are either dismissed
[52:22.000 --> 52:26.000]  Or the court of appeals declines to accept jurisdiction of them
[52:26.000 --> 52:34.000]  Challenges to industrial commission awards and workers compensation matters are also called special actions
[52:34.000 --> 52:37.000]  Because they are made by statute
[52:37.000 --> 52:42.000]  Unless you have a special issue you want addressed
[52:42.000 --> 52:50.000]  A special action here doesn't appear to be an impediment to appeal
[52:50.000 --> 52:57.000]  So I would say hogwash
[52:57.000 --> 53:03.000]  And okay, I'm looking at Rule 7 of Arizona revised statutes
[53:03.000 --> 53:07.000]  Here it is, Rule 7, special appellate court provisions
[53:07.000 --> 53:16.000]  A special action brought in an appellate court shall be initiated by the filing of a petition in the form prescribed by this rule
[53:16.000 --> 53:19.000]  If a special action is brought in any appellate court
[53:19.000 --> 53:27.000]  And if such an action might lawfully have been initiated in a lower court or in the first instance
[53:27.000 --> 53:35.000]  The petition shall also set forth the circumstances which in the opinion of the petitioner render it proper
[53:35.000 --> 53:40.000]  That the petition should be brought in a particular appellate court to which it is presented
[53:40.000 --> 53:45.000]  This sounds like some sort of special remedy
[53:45.000 --> 53:58.000]  It's not a mandamus, but it's or a writ of prohibition or a, what do you call it, a habeas
[53:58.000 --> 54:08.000]  But it sounds as if it is a special remedy that you can use to get it in a question addressed
[54:08.000 --> 54:18.000]  So you might bar grieve this attorney for failure to speak with candor to the court
[54:18.000 --> 54:23.000]  Test for Yucks
[54:23.000 --> 54:30.000]  He got his bar grieve coming anyway, I just did some conduct complaint that judge too, I just did that
[54:30.000 --> 54:35.000]  Good, okay, here's the thing I'm looking at
[54:35.000 --> 54:45.000]  I've got a case law that says that if a judge fails to properly apply the law to the facts
[54:45.000 --> 54:51.000]  That is a due process violation subject to special remedy
[54:51.000 --> 54:56.000]  Special remedy means petition for writ of mandamus
[54:56.000 --> 55:01.000]  That's an extraordinary remedy, I'm sorry, it says subject to extraordinary remedy
[55:01.000 --> 55:05.000]  Yeah, you're right, I see the statute as an extraordinary remedy
[55:05.000 --> 55:13.000]  Okay, it says that it is a due process violation
[55:13.000 --> 55:18.000]  Every code has a official misconduct statute
[55:18.000 --> 55:29.000]  And they all essentially mimic the federal code that says that if a public official fails to perform a duty
[55:29.000 --> 55:36.000]  That is required to perform and in the process deny the citizen full free access to enjoyment of a right
[55:36.000 --> 55:40.000]  Wow, that's a crime in every state
[55:40.000 --> 55:41.000]  Yeah
[55:41.000 --> 55:51.000]  So I'm looking at appealing to the court of appeals and also appealing to the grand jury to indict the scoundrel
[55:51.000 --> 55:55.000]  Yeah, I want to do that
[55:55.000 --> 55:58.000]  He won't see that coming
[55:58.000 --> 56:02.000]  He won't see this complaint coming too, I had just happened to file, I meant to do it earlier
[56:02.000 --> 56:06.000]  But I had to file the complaint on the judge the day before, well the day of remand sentence
[56:06.000 --> 56:13.000]  And I filed it in the commission of judicial conduct right before I went to the remand sentence
[56:13.000 --> 56:26.000]  Good, I know people, they're afraid to file against the judge because they're afraid that the judge will then have it informed
[56:26.000 --> 56:30.000]  But I haven't found that to be the case
[56:30.000 --> 56:36.000]  If you start pushing somebody around and they smack the crap out of you
[56:36.000 --> 56:41.000]  You tend to stop pushing them quite so much, it is human nature
[56:41.000 --> 56:49.000]  And I haven't seen it that judges retaliate against you because that gets them in a really deep water
[56:49.000 --> 56:57.000]  I tell you about a new officer in town, had a fire ban on and I had a little torch doing some plastic welding
[56:57.000 --> 56:59.000]  He told me I couldn't have that
[56:59.000 --> 57:09.000]  I accused him of coming down and harassing me because the district judge sent him to do that
[57:09.000 --> 57:12.000]  Oh my goodness
[57:12.000 --> 57:21.000]  Once you've stung the judge, once you file a judicial conduct or a criminal complaint against him
[57:21.000 --> 57:28.000]  Man, you become taboo, you become untouchable
[57:28.000 --> 57:36.000]  They can't do anything to you, so I'm trying to help people get around this fear of filing criminal complaints
[57:36.000 --> 57:41.000]  I don't see why, I don't see why they won't do it, it's fun, it's been fun to me
[57:41.000 --> 57:45.000]  Oh yeah, and you become a protected class
[57:45.000 --> 57:52.000]  I filed criminal charges against the district judge, this policeman came and told me I couldn't have this little propane torch
[57:52.000 --> 57:55.000]  And I accused the judge of sending him down there to do that
[57:55.000 --> 58:03.000]  He took a giant step back, took out his phone, called about 30 seconds later, I live right next to City Hall
[58:03.000 --> 58:08.000]  The chief of police stepped out and said, Randy, what are you doing to my new officer?
[58:08.000 --> 58:18.000]  Oh Tom, I was just jerking his chain and the officer said, oh God, I saw my whole career pass before my eyes
[58:18.000 --> 58:22.000]  Oh, that was so much fun
[58:22.000 --> 58:26.000]  Okay, we're about to go to break, Randy Kelton, Real Love Radio
[58:26.000 --> 58:31.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984, Tim, I'll see you there
[58:31.000 --> 58:39.000]  And I will get to you, and we'll have plenty of time, but I want to finish up with Ramadhan, he's having way too much fun going after these guys
[58:39.000 --> 59:02.000]  And we'll be right back
[59:09.000 --> 59:14.000]  We'll be right back
[59:39.000 --> 59:45.000]  0102, that's 888-551-0102
[59:45.000 --> 59:52.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org
[59:52.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:09.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdowns
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  In recent news, President Trump's top economic advisor, Gary D. Cohn, stated yesterday
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  Tuesday that he was indeed resigning this after giving a heads up last week that he was considering doing so if President Trump decided to fall through with his tariffs on imported aluminum and steel
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  Of course, with President Trump's announcement last week that he would indeed levy tariffs on aluminum and steel imports, the reason for Mr. Cohn's departure seems obvious for many,
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  considering he was one of the lone vocal opponents of any such measures in the administration
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  According to a report by The Daily Mail, skeletal biology expert Richard Jantz out of the University of Tennessee believes he may have found the skeletal remains of Amelia Earhart on a Pacific Island
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  Amelia went missing in 1937 when her plane and navigator Fred Newton were never to be found
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  At least until now, Richard Jantz stated that what I can say scientifically is that they, the recent Pacific Island remains, are 99% likely to be hers
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:02:13.000]  Interesting timing for this finding to be released, considering that the 1932 Hudson Essex Terraplane, which once belonged to Earhart, was reportedly stolen on Friday, February 23, 2018, only to be found three days later on the street corner in the Sereno neighborhood in L.A.
[01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:25.000]  The crypto market took a big blow today, Wednesday, with the top 10 currencies suffering 5-10% losses. This downturn right after the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it would be requiring digital asset exchanges to register with them.
[01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  According to the SEC statement, quote, if a platform offers trading of digital assets that are securities and operates as an exchange as defined by the federal securities laws, then the platform must register with the SEC as a national securities exchange or be exempt from registration.
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:58.000]  The low-star lowdown is looking for sponsors. You have a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us. Feel free to give me a call at 210-363-1257. This was Rick Rody with your lowdown for March 7, 2018.
[01:03:11.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Roodle Law Radio, and we're talking to Ramadan in Arizona. You do seem to be having some fun with this, and that's good to hear.
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  Oh, hold on. I didn't get you unmuted. Try that again. Okay, that time it took. Okay. Where were we, Ramadan?
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  Well, what was the case law you stated that, you say you started the case law, that the judges had a duty to follow the laws as evidence, Rick?
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  Wait, hold on. You sound muffled. Could you move the mic a little away from your mouth? I'll bring it to you.
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:12.000]  Okay, is that better?
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  That's better.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  Okay. What's the case law that states that the judge has a duty to perform all of the laws that is written or something like that?
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  It has a duty to properly apply the law to the facts.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  The law to the facts.
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  And I've got a bunch of case law on that. If you do a search for that, you'll probably find Arizona law to that as well.
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  You know, this goes with, I keep saying the only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  So all you want to do is get the facts on the record and the law in the record and ask the court to properly apply the law to the facts.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  It's the only reason the judge is there. If the judge has a different agenda, I want him off the bench.
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  Just apply the law to the facts and we'll go to the appellate court and straighten all this out.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  Yeah. I mean, I made it pretty clear in the trial court, especially my closing argument, to say that the state needs to prove lawful authority.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  And their only contention was that, well, we didn't know.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  Like, oh, we didn't know that the unmarked vehicle, there was a statute that says that it needs to have designations on it.
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:52.000]  I mean, there is an exemption, but the exemption states, quote, it's for selling the investigation and activities of confidential nature.
[01:05:52.000 --> 01:06:04.000]  That's what it says. And it says that the, but the, my brother Butter was that they had a city council report that was this issue two months prior to the stop.
[01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  That says that it was a re, re, not reauthorizing, but basically restating or reminding the political subdivision to go back to the statutes or have a application on file to exempt from it.
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  Like, that was, and that was like, well, the thing is, I did not admit that into evidence, like the physical paper, but I did mention it in court.
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  Okay, that should be, was this a court of record?
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:42.000]  Yes, it was.
[01:06:42.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  That should be enough. Did you say that the prosecution said they didn't know?
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:07:02.000]  Yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They didn't even know. They, they, they, well, when I gave my closing argument, and actually they put to get theirs first, but I did mine first.
[01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  And then their contention was that, well, we never had a problem with decal matters.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:18.000]  If decals on the, on the unmarked vehicle, if that is the case, then 75% of our DUI cases need to be overturned.
[01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  He said that?
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  Ooh, you should have objected to relevance.
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:33.000]  You should also file a bargremence against him for that, for improperly, for failing to speak with Candard as a court.
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  That's an irrelevant argument, has nothing to do with the application of law.
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  He's trying to improperly influence the judge.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  Yeah.
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:51.000]  This sounds, this sounds like you got a pretty pat case.
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  Yeah, this is a, it's pretty solid. I mean, now, to state the fact, I actually was in, in commerce.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  However, I did content it, I did contrast it a little bit. You know, they, they didn't really...
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, but here's the thing about in commerce. Doesn't matter if you were in commerce or not.
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  It matters if they, they pled the elements of commerce.
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:27.000]  If they didn't plead the elements, it doesn't matter what you were.
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  Well, with the terminology, of course, I did, the once they mentioned vehicle, I objected.
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  And I forgot the proper words that Eddie instructs me to say, but then the judge would say, well, we all know the meaning of vehicle.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  So your motion is denied. And then he's a good Tokyo back witness officer to carry on.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  And...
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:09:04.000]  And that's okay. You just noticed the court that in this case, you object to the use of the term vehicle to apply to imply or establish the element of commerce.
[01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  I did. I did contend that in the, take note of that in the appellate brief that I wrote.
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  That's plenty. That's, that's all you need.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  I did object to it, even though actually I was because I was operating as the lift driver.
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  And...
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  Who cares? Who cares? They got approved that...
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  Yeah.
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  They didn't...
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  You don't have to stipulate to anything. They got approved.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  Right, exactly. And they didn't prove that.
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  And the only contention and transportation that I gave while in trial was of the audio recording that I had played and letting them know that I am not engaging in any commercial use of the highways.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  I did state that on the record, but that's only through the audio recording.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  And... But I was just mainly trying to go with my closing argument. I let it be known. I said, look, this, the statute states this illegally.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  The exemption statute states this. This officer testified that he was on patrol.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  He didn't even say that I was conducting DUI enforcement or drug enforcement. He never testified that. He said patrol.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  Now, Eddie wanted me to go after the license plate because that's what he did. He ran it behind me. He read my license plate, saw that the license was suspended, and then pulled me over.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:38.000]  Now, Eddie was saying that you should challenge it as while the license plate is in the public eye and it has no...
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  And he said something while the license plate in the public eye, the information attached to the license plate is guarded by...
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  It is guarded from arbitrary search, which is kind of true.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  Now, I was looking at the case law in which they contested that. They contested a case law of a state versus Harding.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:18.000]  It was in 1983 that was stating that... Well, what I just mentioned, that there is no expectation of privacy in the public of the license plate that thrust itself to the public eye.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  Now, it just gave... That was like the only contention. It didn't have any kind of case law backing that.
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  And that was in 1983. And that was the only case law that they had cited. It was on the Supreme Court case law.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:48.000]  But what I was theorizing, and this is... If I get a chance to make an argument on this, is that what I learned in a New Jersey Supreme Court case law in 1998,
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:56.000]  those two cases running together that stated that it was saying the same thing. There was no expectation of privacy.
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  But what the New Jersey Supreme Court law enforcement agencies need to do is have two stages in which not all the personal information is available up for want.
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:24.000]  And that only the validity that they need will be in the first stages and only when they have probable reason or suspicion of a violation in the first stage would they go to the second stage.
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  Now, in trial, I had got the officer to explain that. He did say that he did not have any kind of red flag in the first stage.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  He said in the first stage there is a valid of insurance and registration, but not the driver.
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  And then he said he pressed the hyperlink button that goes and brings up all the other information.
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  So that is...
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  So you're saying he did an improper search?
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:08.000]  Well, yes. In accordance to other case law what I've learned from New Jersey, but we don't have case law here, at least they didn't contest it.
[01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  Well, under full faith and credit, you can bring New Jersey case law here on the same issue as it's not controlling, but it is advisory.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  It would be a nice issue to take to the Supreme.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  That actually is, but I don't know if I will get that contention based on the way you explained earlier about the right to an appeal.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  That's why I lie right now. I just filed a lot of notice of appeal two weeks ago, and so I need to include my designations of record.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  And I want to include that the paper, the city council report. It was a nine-page city council report.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  And I want to include that on the designation of record, because I did mention it, but I didn't...
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:06.000]  I mentioned it at trial, but I didn't even put the paperwork as evident.
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  Since it was public record, I think that it...
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  Yeah, since it's public record, that may not be a problem anyway. You could certainly ask the city to stipulate.
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  I don't see how they could exclude it, since you mentioned, since you referenced it.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:24.000]  Yeah.
[01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  And was there an objection to your reference?
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:29.000]  No, not at all.
[01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  Then there should be no problem.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:36.000]  Not to say there won't be, but there shouldn't be.
[01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  Oh, yeah, that's what I was trying to... This poskiet has been... He's throwing in my back.
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:47.000]  He's been trying to nail me at every point, because I'm appropriately lit again.
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:50.000]  Have you bar-grieved him yet?
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  I have not. I should have now.
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  Yeah, you need to sting him good, and sting him for something really stupid.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  Oh, yeah, I will.
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:16.000]  That's to say, I'm being nice here, mess with me, and I might get worse.
[01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  Yeah.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  I'm a deaf... He got hit coming quick. He's the worst. He just... He comes in and just says all the junk.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:29.000]  He's citing statues that don't even exist, and I looked it up,
[01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  because I audio-recorded the romance interest, and I looked up what he said.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  That's at 12-375.
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  I thought he had something going for a second.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  I'm like, wait a minute. I'm looking at this. This statue doesn't even exist.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  Bologna. He's full of it.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:51.000]  The judge, too. I think he's colluding with a judge. That's his favorite judge, because it's twice he had changed the judge.
[01:15:51.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  Wait. I was going to have a different judge, and then right before trial, they switched it.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  The initial trial, they switched the judge to a guy I never heard of, and now I went to the clerk, the court reporter.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:08.000]  I said, hey, I thought, I'll judge off of us for a year.
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:12.000]  He said, no, oh, he can't be here today. We're going to know the judge. I was okay.
[01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  And then when he gives me a letter saying that it hasn't remained sentencing, it went back to the original judge that we were supposed to have.
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  And then he sent me another letter the next day saying that because of scheduling issues, we had to schedule to another judge.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:29.000]  And I'm like, oh, I see what's going on.
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  Okay. In Texas, if they assign a judge, you can arbitrarily and capriciously strike the first judge.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  That means if they'll appoint their hanging judge, the only retired judge is not going to have to worry about being elected. You strike it.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Check to see if you can do that in Arizona.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  Hang on. We're about to go to break. We're going to help with our radio. We'll be right back.
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:29.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  No.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  No.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  No.
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  We are Logos.
[01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:29.000]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Ramadan Arizona.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:44.000]  We need to move along. I've got Tim. He's been waiting for a long time. So, where are you going from here?
[01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:54.000]  It was on the Court of Appeal. That's the next stop. That's at least where I filed a notice of appeal.
[01:19:54.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  I'm just waiting for their hear back, but I have filed a destination record. That's my next move right there.
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:07.000]  We need to file that city council report.
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:17.000]  Another thing that might help me in the argument about the MR car and then how we'll finish it up with this is that in the transportation title,
[01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:34.000]  it actually has a statute that doesn't allow a charging of a class by felony for eluding a law enforcement vehicle if there are no markings on it.
[01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  It literally says there, and it's not even hard to understand. It's right there in the title of the statute,
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  but the markings are required for a law enforcement vehicle who will have a person attempting to flee,
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:54.000]  or it says willfully flee or attempt to elude a law enforcement vehicle.
[01:20:54.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  And it says the law enforcement vehicle shall be marked properly to let it be known it is a law enforcement vehicle.
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:11.000]  Now, that may give me a little bit of argument if I get a chance to argument this, and I will throw that in there somehow.
[01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  Were you charged with eluding?
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  No, no, no. I wasn't charged with that.
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:34.000]  If I was thinking why you were saying that, it'll make the point that if they're going to be on patrol, they need to be in a marked vehicle because they will create a situation where they will frighten people
[01:21:34.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  and people will run for them because they think they're somebody pretending to be a law enforcement officer.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  But I don't see how you can get it to be material for the case.
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  But it doesn't get it. It doesn't matter.
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  If it bolsters your point that the officer should have had a marked vehicle and he knew he should have had a marked vehicle because he has imputed knowledge of this statute and he has actual knowledge or not.
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  Right. Well, thank you. Basically, I want to know if I should be able to admit that City Council report into the designation of records. That's basically what I wanted to know.
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  You can certainly stick it in there and all the other side can do is object to it.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  But since you mentioned it in court and it was referenced in court and there was no objection to the court's likely to allow it.
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  Exactly. All right then. Thank you, Mr. Kelsen. He was a insider, right?
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  Okay. Keep us up to date. And find a good Bargui was to give this guy just for yucks.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  I'm trying to find many.
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  Okay. Thank you, Ramadan. Now we're going to Tim in Texas. Hello, Tim.
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  Hello, sir.
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  You didn't fall asleep while you were waiting.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  No, no, no. I was intently listening to you guys speak back forth.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  Okay. What do you have for us today?
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:35.000]  Well, we were talking earlier today about perhaps getting someone to ask a few questions to the City Council.
[01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:40.000]  And it appears that two people ahead in mind are going to be out of town.
[01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  So I was wondering if it's really that important for me to even, you know, bring this issue up before them because apparently our intent is to ambush them for all of the stuff that they've been doing.
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:05.000]  It seems like everybody else's problems either a mortgage or a traffic ticket. Mine is important.
[01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  And the things that I brought up in the past were that, you know, they held an administrative hearing.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  They appointed the administrative board antics so that they would rule against me.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  They were biased from the get-go, but apparently that doesn't matter at all.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  And then you try to look it up to find out about administrative hearings. There's like two paragraphs, maybe four sentences.
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:50.000]  And it's not that detailed, so it doesn't really tell you that much about administrative hearings and what the prerequisites are.
[01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  But here, in this case, it's not really a matter of whether or not they could hold an administrative hearing.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  The issue here is whether they can alter the purpose of an administrative hearing after it's been ordered.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  Where the administrative hearing was ordered for one purpose, can they repurpose the hearing without giving notice?
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  Well, here's what I wanted to clarify. When you say that, if I remember right, she took us to a background.
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  This was the first day and my wife recorded the conversation.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  So I asked her, you know, what she wanted to do because I had already told her that I, you know, had already filled out the paperwork that I wanted at jury trial,
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  and I pledged my guilty. So, you know, her being learned counsel, that's one of your references, she only gave me one option.
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  And that option was to have an administrative hearing. Well, obviously, if I'm not a, you know, if I'm not an attorney, then I don't really know the full implications of that.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  And the judge, when we went back in, you know, she stood up and said, your honor, he's requesting an administrative hearing.
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  Wait, wait, she said more than that. She said he is requesting an administrative hearing to determine if the vehicles in question are junk.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  That's what she said to the judge. And that's on the recording.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Then when they held the hearing, they treated it as if you waived your right to a jury trial and held a hearing on the merits of the criminal complaints.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  And we challenged that. We filed a challenge to subject meta jurisdiction, which we went unanswered. We filed a motion for summary judgment, which went unanswered.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  We petitioned the court to set the summary judgment motion for hearing. The court refused.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:36.000]  So there, since there is an unanswered subject meta jurisdiction challenge before the court, there cannot be a final adjudication.
[01:27:36.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  And when they filed in the city, looks like we lost our call board, the city in this case filed a motion, an action in the court to collect on this supposed final adjudication when there wasn't one.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  And they're claiming that Tim didn't appeal their hearing. Well, there never was a final adjudication. We did go to the county court and asked the county court to order them to hold a hearing on the summary judgment.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  The county court refused. So we're waiting for a ruling in the district court. But they just filed a motion to, for summary judgment, claiming that a set of facts that we challenged.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  The only way you can file summary judgment is if there are no material facts in contention. We're a number of material facts in contention here. So we're going to take, we're going to go after them.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  We have filed a request for findings, effect and conclusions at law. The judge had 20 days under statute to produce it. Monday will be the 20th day.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:05.000]  So if he hasn't produced it, then we're going to file criminally against the judge.
[01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  We filed a pleading that demonstrated that what they were doing was absolutely outrageous.
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  And the court dismissed all of our claims with prejudice. And he did so without comment.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  So he just simply said, I don't care what you bring to me, I'm going to deny it. So we'll see how that works for him.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Now we've asked him to produce findings, effect and conclusions at law in support of his ruling. And he's not going to be able to find any.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  And if he does like all other judges do, they just ignore it and don't answer it. So as soon as he doesn't answer it, we file with a grand jury on him.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  Because, okay, hang on.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  Are you one of those people who simply hates the taste of broccoli? The reason could be in your genes.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albright and I'll be back in just a moment to tell you why one man's yummy vegetable is another man's bitter enemy.
[01:30:13.000 --> 01:30:19.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:24.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:29.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  Black broccoli. It can be slathered with butter or steamed in a cheesy sauce, yet many people still sense its bitter aftertaste.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  Now there's a scientific explanation for why so many people can't stand this healthy green vegetable.
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:31:02.000]  Researchers have found that people who hate broccoli have a gene that picks up the taste of phenyl-phiocarbonide, PTC, for short.
[01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  This chemical is responsible for the bitterness in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, cauliflower and brussels sprouts.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  If you can taste PTC, you're in good company. About 70% of the U.S. population has PTC taste receptors.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  The other 30%, including me, just don't taste the bitterness.
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  I'll have to be a little more understanding with the rest of you.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:27.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:09.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails.
[01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  Good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:31.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:39.000]  Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we have a new caller on the board, Tim from Texas.
[01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  Thank you.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  In doing the last segment, Tim dropped off.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  And so don't anybody tell him all that stuff I said about him while he couldn't hear me?
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Well, my son was listening to it.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  I'm down in Luskin at my oldest son's house.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  Okay, so...
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:08.000]  Hold on. I went through kind of what was going on that what was filed,
[01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  and now we have a summary judgment motion file that was...
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:19.000]  I didn't get into the details on the summary judgment motion, but it's absolutely frivolous.
[01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:27.000]  They stated facts that they contended as if they were established fact
[01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  while our pleadings contradicted their facts,
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  and they moved for summary judgment as if there were no facts in contention.
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  That makes this a frivolous pleading.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  So we'll file for sanctions, which we certainly won't get,
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  and we fully expect the judge to rule in their favor.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:56.000]  And in fact, it won't hurt us because the judge has already demonstrated
[01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  that he has no concern for the facts of the law,
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:09.000]  and we'll demonstrate that we have no concern for his position as district judge.
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  He was appointed, so we may see if we can keep him from getting elected next time around.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  The problem is, in the small county we live in, nobody runs for the position.
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  So the judge generally runs unopposed.
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  Well, his private practice has been across the street from the courthouse for years, right?
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  Yeah, it has.
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  Well, it kind of a block away.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  Yeah.
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  So he's at retirement age, so he's trying to get into the...
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  on the other side of the bench, but you would think that someone who spent the majority of their life arguing the law
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  would want to see some of that get behind the bench, but apparently it doesn't really matter to them, does it?
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  Yeah, I think lawyers live in a different world than we do, and they have different influences.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  We still think that the law counts, and they've been around long enough to know it doesn't.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  Yeah.
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:24.000]  They tend to understand that only politics counts.
[01:36:24.000 --> 01:36:26.000]  All right.
[01:36:26.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  So we will introduce him to some politics.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:40.000]  My whole thing is trying to understand this, you know, when I tried to go over the law, excuse me, the statute,
[01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  reading the position that the attorneys for the city have taken against me.
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  I don't see a lot of the stuff that you see, and I don't know how to argue it.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  That's because this is your first time through.
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  Yeah.
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  I've been where you are, except mine was a lot worse.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  Yeah.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  The jury found me guilty, and threw the book at me, gave me a year in jail, $10,000 fine.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:19.000]  Was that in Cherokee County?
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  Pardon me?
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  Where was this at?
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  In Cherokee County.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  Yeah, that's what I was asking, Cherokee County.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  Okay, I spent 27 days in solitary confinement and finally had enough.
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  And I wrote up 35 criminal complaints in a huge affidavit, filed it with the court of appeals,
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  and three days I was out of jail.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  All right.
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  Man, they did not want to go there.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:51.000]  So we're still mucking around down here with the locals.
[01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:52.000]  Okay.
[01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  I have another question.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  There's a change when we take the step up to the court of appeals.
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:04.000]  Well, yeah, you said that this is all not to expect for them to side with me in the lower court.
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  That sets everything up with your appeals process.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  But I have a question.
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  But, you know, even after all this time, you would go to a lot of trouble to produce well-constructive pleadings.
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  And you still want to think that there is some place where a judge will actually rule on the pleadings.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  Yeah.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:30.000]  And they just don't.
[01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  Well, you know, the thing that Eddie and you both, Eddie doesn't talk very much, you know, just on the internet, not in person.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  I've talked to you extensively for the past year.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:55.000]  And but it seems that, you know, you're looking to find out what it is in the law that they have to come after you.
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  It seems that the ordinances from what I understand are not.
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  They're not the legislature is given the right by the people to make the law.
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  And then the courts are supposed to carry it out.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  But apparently when a municipality is coming at you criminally with a class C, that's what this ordinance charges were.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  It says the state of Texas, so it's as if the municipality is representing you.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  Am I right so far?
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  Yes.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  And that's where the problem lies.
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:45.000]  They don't have the legal right to do that.
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:47.000]  This is what this is.
[01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  This is the argument we have in our pleadings is that while the Constitution gave the legislature the authority to write law.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:07.000]  And the gave this the legislature certain authority to delegate certain issues.
[01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  They did not give the legislature authority to delegate lawmaking powers.
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  And the legislature delegated lawmaking powers to municipalities.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  So now you have a municipality who's making the law and enforcing the law against you.
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  Yes.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  And now they tricked me with the administrative hearing.
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  They didn't.
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:39.000]  You did everything right.
[01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:42.000]  They're lying.
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  Well, what I'm saying is that if I had known what was going to take place, I would have said no, want the jury to help.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:52.000]  Yeah, but you know how that works.
[01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  You can't, you know, I'm not clairvoyant.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  Neither are you.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:40:57.000]  Yeah.
[01:40:57.000 --> 01:41:05.000]  You want to expect that these people will actually somewhere at some point follow law.
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  And it's even at this point after all these years, it's still incredibly disappointing when they just totally ignore law.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:25.000]  I really expected this brand new judge might actually look at the facts in the law.
[01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  He did not care.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  Maybe I should take this as a lesson.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:41.000]  Well, here's what they're trying to teach me from the first day that we walked into the courthouse for my arraignment or pre-trial hearing.
[01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:52.000]  I picked up the paper on the little bench inside the door and it was my case and it had signs for each one of the vehicles on my property.
[01:41:52.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  And it totaled $808 with the administrative fees, which is $808 total.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:08.000]  And because I was not going to plead guilty or no contest, they decided, well, we'll just, we'll drag it through the administrative hearing.
[01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  We'll get a by-spanel and we'll find ten times that amount.
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  And so they find me $8,000.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:28.000]  And now that I didn't pay them and I went ahead and used the administrative process to, you know, challenge subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  And then when they didn't answer that, we tried to get a summary judgment.
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:33.000]  They didn't answer that.
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:39.000]  Then they took us to district court, which it became a civil case then.
[01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  And because it became a civil case, they put in their nice thick handwriting brochure that they gave me, stack of papers against me, basically, upwards of $100,000.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  So it's like those ten times and then ten times.
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:12.000]  And this is, this intimidates people into saying, okay, what do I got to do to make this thing stop before it rolls over me instead of saying, is this justice?
[01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  And I'm making sense, Brandy.
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  You're making sense.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  And, you know, the problem is I've, you know, I hear this all the time.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  These guys know that if they get outrageous enough, they will terrify people till they just give up.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  And every once in a while, they come across someone who won't.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  And they just don't come across it enough.
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  And we haven't went after them hard enough.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  I do really start me to get back to putting together criminal complaints and bar grievances against these lawyers.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  I'm so buried in what I'm doing.
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:53.000]  I've let that lapse.
[01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  And I really need to get some bar grievances against these lawyers.
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:43:59.000]  That'll give them a dog in the heart.
[01:43:59.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Okay, go.
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  Thank you.
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:03.000]  Thank you.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:55.000]  Thank you.
[01:45:55.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  Thank you.
[01:46:25.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  Thank you.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:38.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  Randy Kelton.
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  We're talking to Tim in Texas.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:47.000]  And Tim, I understand you're frustrated.
[01:46:47.000 --> 01:46:54.000]  I've been doing this a long time and I'd hoped before this I would have things straightened out.
[01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  But I am confident.
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  Judges and prosecutors are used to, and lawyers for the most part, are used to having the legal system all to themselves.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:14.000]  This tool I'm working on, we will begin to change that.
[01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  I almost have it ready.
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:23.000]  I hope to have it ready Monday so I can start promoting it on traffic.
[01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  We've got 6.6 million traffic tickets a year, so I've got a lot to work with.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  And I expect this to shake the legal system to their foundations because we're going after the lawyers and the judges personally, both criminally and civilly.
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  And in getting traffic together, I've got 90% of criminals put together.
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:48:00.000]  It'll be not a great leap to branch out to areas where I move into higher courts.
[01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:09.000]  And even with traffic, we'll move into the higher courts because I'm going to start producing petitions for declaratory judgment.
[01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  And that'll move us up into the higher courts.
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:23.000]  And when the higher courts do what judges do what this judge did, because it's a pro se, we file criminal charges on him just like this one.
[01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:36.000]  And one of the good things, if we can get several hundred people around the state to file these documents, we'll get several hundred responses to it.
[01:48:36.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  And some of those will be unique, interesting and innovative.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  When we get one of those, I just go into the questionnaire, crack it open at the right place, drop some questions in that goes to this issue, and develop pleadings that go to it, and we've got it done.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  So the next guy that comes up with that one, we're already on him.
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  And there's only a certain amount of things they can do.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  And when we get this to where we go in, like you go into the first hearing, and instead of holding an examining trial, they try to hold an arrangement.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  The next day, we drop criminal charges on the judge, on the prosecutor, bar, grievance, judicial conduct, and blank.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  A tort letter to the municipality or the county, whoever it is, professional conduct complaints against the police officer.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  The next day, so we don't spend a lot of time trying to figure out what to do, it tells them, we were laying in wait for you.
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  So now let's try the next step, and we'll be laying in wait for them.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:04.000]  We'll create a situation where every one of these public officials have multiple criminal charges coming at them.
[01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  You know, they're sitting there thinking, oh, the grand jury wanted to indict me.
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  But if they have multiple people coming to them with one criminal complaint after another, it's going to terrify them.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  Go ahead.
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:33.000]  We were talking about, you know, I was talking about maybe going before the council myself before this next trial day.
[01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  And just going over, you know, everything and showing how that they basically, from the get-go, they were...
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:48.000]  Wait, wait, wait, you can't go before the council and talk about this.
[01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:49.000]  Okay.
[01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:52.000]  Because you're the litigant.
[01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:53.000]  Right.
[01:50:53.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  Yeah, the lawyer will say, we can't talk about this here. You have to have a third party.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  Yeah, and that's... Okay, so if they were to say, and you just set this guy up, I mean, I could put it out point by point and show how that they have attempted to set me up.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  And, you know, we talked about a guy that's on the council now that was on the administrative board that has a vehicle that's been in...
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:33.000]  You know, he's, for eight months, they've had illegal vehicle. You could see it from the city, or from the city street, excuse me.
[01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  And then across from City Hall, you could see another vehicle that's been there for five years. It's illegal.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:50.000]  And then they had the tar of, our tub of tar, asphalt tar, by a water well by the entrance.
[01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:53.000]  Okay, you're using pronouns.
[01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  The city itself had this tub of tar. Wasn't it leaking?
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  Yeah, it was leaking. They had pictures of photographs.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  And so they had to... Actually, it wasn't me. Somebody else is the one that took the pictures and somebody else saw the pictures.
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  And they don't even live in the city, but they come to the council meetings and they turned them into the EPA and they cost them over $1,500 to have it removed.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  But they had been walking by this thing for years.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:34.000]  You know, the superintendent knew about it. The mayor knew about it. City administrator knew about it. They can't deny it.
[01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:39.000]  They all, I didn't see that. No, they can't deny it. You understand what I'm saying?
[01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:40.000]  Yeah.
[01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:50.000]  The entrance for the employees going in and out. So there's so many violations that the city has been doing that yet they have singled me out.
[01:52:50.000 --> 01:53:00.000]  And it is pretty obvious. So somebody had mentioned selective and malicious.
[01:53:00.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  And, you know, we've gathered evidence, but somebody asked me, I think it was Eddie. He said, how do you expect to get standing? And I don't understand standing.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:16.000]  I mean, if somebody's doing something wrong...
[01:53:16.000 --> 01:53:19.000]  Okay. How were you harmed?
[01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  How were you harmed by this illegal vehicle that's been there for five years?
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:32.000]  How were you harmed by that tank of tar?
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  How were they harmed by my vehicles that were in my repair?
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  That's not the question. They don't have standing either.
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  The question is not, did they have, because they were bad, somehow you've got standing. The court, the requirement to get into court, there must be an injured party.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  Okay.
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  I'm not saying you don't have standing. I'm saying you've got to develop it. You have to show how that contributes to a harm against you.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  And all of that contributes to the assertion that this is a malicious and selective enforcement perpetrated for a, I'm trying to think of the exact right word that's in the code, for an evil purpose.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:42.000]  That had nothing to do with law. It had to do with a city administrator retaliating against your wife for not voting for her race.
[01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  Yeah.
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:51.000]  So that's how we can get there. And everything you have to be able to establish why it's relevant.
[01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  Yeah. Well, maybe that's what I haven't understood.
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:03.000]  Because anytime somebody brings something to me, I'm always thinking, okay, so what?
[01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  Yeah.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  So what does that have to do with anything? And you have to be able to answer that question at every step.
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  Yeah.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  This guy's got a junk vehicle right across from City Hall, so what?
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  I've got some vehicles that I'm saving to work on right across from City Hall. They come and prosecuted me and they left that guy alone. They left that guy alone because he had not annoyed the city administrator.
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  The city administrator is using her authority as a weapon against anyone that doesn't do what she wants. That's an evil purpose.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  She's got the council behind her, so there's been some effect there. They were going to pave my road.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:52.000]  And then the guy that's supposed to be the know-it-all engineer that's on the council, he comes down and look at my road.
[01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  And then he says, well, he's got vehicles in his yard that are not legal and we need to just come about that.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:06.000]  So they pull the funding from my road and start coming after me for vehicles.
[01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  Okay, okay. Don't mention that. That takes it away from the city administrator.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:17.000]  Yeah.
[01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  If you say everybody's out to give me, they're not going to buy it. But if you say the city administrator's out to give me and she'll call us why she is and don't dilute it, otherwise you'll dilute her own claim.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  I gotcha.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:38.000]  Okay.
[01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  Well, here we go.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:57.000]  Well, I think it's going well. They're not careful in their pleading. This last pleading, if it was written by the head of the law firm, we're going to bargle even for writing a frivolous pleading.
[01:56:57.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  Okay.
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:11.000]  As he failed to speak with Canada to the court, he stated facts to the court. When you file a petition for summary judgment, there can be no facts in contention.
[01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:19.000]  And he stated the fact that there was a final determination, a final order in this case, and there is no final order.
[01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  He said, we didn't appeal it. We didn't appeal it because there's no final order.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:34.000]  He said that, there were several other things that he stated as if they were facts. He said there was a trial.
[01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:45.000]  And there wasn't one. There was an administrative hearing. He said that you agreed to waive your trial and have this administrative hearing. You didn't.
[01:57:45.000 --> 01:58:01.000]  You agreed to have a different administrative hearing. So we'll go down that and bargreaves him. And good chance with this second bargreavance to cancel the law firm's malpractice insurance.
[01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  Well, I'm not going to take three, so we'll have to file a third one to get their malpractice insurance cancelled. And that will make them crazy.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  They can't be a law firm for the city if they don't have malpractice insurance.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  Well, we already know that the Texas Municipal League is representing them, so...
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  Yeah, that one, we can bargreave him until they detect his municipal legal act to fire him.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:39.000]  Hang on, we are out of time. Thank you all for listening. We'll be back next week. Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Regal Law Radio. You might go check Logos Radio Network.
[01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  We have our fundraiser going. We're trying to get enough funds to keep this show going for another year. Thank you all for listening. Good night.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.