ROL_2017-08-04_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.320]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[00:05.320 --> 00:11.520]  Markets for Wednesday, July 26, 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,260.75
[00:11.520 --> 00:18.680]  in ounce, silver $16.69 in ounce, Texas Crude $47.89 in barrel, and Bitcoin is sitting
[00:18.680 --> 00:22.960]  a little over $2,474 U.S. currency.
[00:22.960 --> 00:30.640]  Today in history, the year 1938, an unprecedented swarm of grasshoppers descends on crops throughout
[00:30.640 --> 00:33.800]  the American heartland, devastating millions of acres.
[00:33.800 --> 00:38.600]  Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota, already in the midst of a bad drought, suffered the
[00:38.600 --> 00:41.400]  most from this grasshopper disaster.
[00:41.400 --> 00:46.680]  Today in history.
[00:46.680 --> 00:47.680]  And recent news.
[00:47.680 --> 00:51.520]  Yesterday, Tuesday, police chiefs from three of the five biggest cities in the state spoke
[00:51.520 --> 00:55.920]  out at the Texas Capitol against the transgender bathroom bill, being considered by the Republican
[00:55.920 --> 01:01.280]  legislator as discriminatory and in divergence of resources that won't keep people safe.
[01:01.280 --> 01:05.600]  The police chiefs were joined by public school officials, advocates for sexual assault survivors,
[01:05.600 --> 01:09.680]  representatives from the Harris County and El Paso Sheriff's offices, the Corpus Christi
[01:09.680 --> 01:12.280]  ISD chief of police and others.
[01:12.280 --> 01:17.040]  The main issue, as Austin police chief Brian Manley put it, is that if, quote, a bill like
[01:17.040 --> 01:22.160]  this were to be passed, that would pull police officers time away from combating violent crime
[01:22.160 --> 01:23.960]  into enforcing a bathroom bill.
[01:23.960 --> 01:29.400]  It makes communities less safe, since it is time not spent ensuring community safety.
[01:29.400 --> 01:33.120]  The legislation would restrict bathroom use in schools and local government buildings
[01:33.120 --> 01:37.440]  by superseding and nullifying parts of local non-discrimination ordinances meant to allow
[01:37.440 --> 01:42.320]  transgender residents, which make up less than 1% of the population, the claim to use
[01:42.320 --> 01:44.320]  the public bathroom of their choice.
[01:44.320 --> 01:46.960]  The bill did pass just after midnight last night.
[01:46.960 --> 01:55.960]  The Senate voted 21 to 10, and it now goes to the House for consideration.
[01:55.960 --> 02:00.520]  An information technology staffer for former chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee,
[02:00.520 --> 02:05.240]  Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Democrat from Florida, Imran Awan, a 37-year-old,
[02:05.240 --> 02:10.240]  was arrested on Monday by FBI agents in U.S. Capitol Police at Dulles International Airport
[02:10.240 --> 02:12.920]  while attempting to flee to Lahore, Pakistan.
[02:12.920 --> 02:16.800]  Awan was charged with big fraud in the U.S. District Court on Tuesday, where he pleaded
[02:16.800 --> 02:17.800]  not guilty.
[02:17.800 --> 02:22.040]  According to federal court documents, officials were accusing Awan and his wife, Kina Alvi,
[02:22.040 --> 02:27.400]  of defrauding the Congressional Federal Credit Union of $165,000 by lying on a home equity
[02:27.400 --> 02:32.120]  loan application and not listing the home that they were getting the loan for as a rental
[02:32.120 --> 02:33.120]  property.
[02:33.120 --> 02:37.520]  Awan was released and is under a high-intensity supervision program with his hearing scheduled
[02:37.520 --> 02:39.600]  for 21 August.
[02:39.600 --> 02:43.480]  President's lawyer Christopher Gowen said that the charges are politically motivated
[02:43.480 --> 02:49.920]  and, quote, began as part of a frenzy of anti-Muslim bigotry in the literal heart of our democracy,
[02:49.920 --> 02:50.920]  the House of Representatives.
[02:50.920 --> 03:16.200]  This is Rick Froney with your loadout for July 26, 2017.
[03:16.200 --> 03:26.440]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rural Law Radio, and Olivier, you have done exactly
[03:26.440 --> 03:35.200]  what I have for years claimed was my purpose, is to get every judge in the country wondering
[03:35.200 --> 03:40.240]  which one of those scoundrels out there in the gallery is going to drop the sky on me,
[03:40.240 --> 03:45.480]  and that's exactly what you've done to these guys.
[03:45.480 --> 03:47.480]  This is how we get liberty.
[03:47.480 --> 03:48.480]  Okay.
[03:48.480 --> 04:05.200]  Now, addressing that, also, now, that comes to, one may do very difficult for them, so
[04:05.200 --> 04:10.600]  that technically adds to my abuse of process, too.
[04:10.600 --> 04:11.600]  Correct?
[04:11.600 --> 04:18.520]  Wait, I missed you, you kind of broke up there on part of that, the first thing you said.
[04:18.520 --> 04:29.160]  I want to make it extremely difficult for them, so these facts about the right, denying
[04:29.160 --> 04:40.520]  right to counsel of choice should get a suit for abuse of process and, yeah, abuse of process
[04:40.520 --> 04:50.880]  and include the DA, because the DA was the one telling the judge what the law was precedent.
[04:50.880 --> 04:58.280]  Look up the American Bar Association Standards for the Prosecutorals Function.
[04:58.280 --> 05:02.560]  You can find it on the American Bar Association website.
[05:02.560 --> 05:06.560]  I don't think a single prosecutor has ever read that.
[05:06.560 --> 05:10.000]  Is that nationwide or a state?
[05:10.000 --> 05:18.920]  Well, the American Bar Association Standards have not been adopted by the states, but the
[05:18.920 --> 05:24.720]  American Bar Association has defined what are proper standards for prosecutors, so you
[05:24.720 --> 05:25.720]  can use them.
[05:25.720 --> 05:28.200]  I've used them in court.
[05:28.200 --> 05:31.360]  I had a prosecutor on the stand.
[05:31.360 --> 05:35.240]  We called all the witnesses, and the judge asked me, do you have any more witnesses?
[05:35.240 --> 05:37.000]  Yes, or no, I call Stephen Hale.
[05:37.000 --> 05:42.640]  That was the prosecutor, the prosecutor jumped up and said, we can do that, and the judge
[05:42.640 --> 05:49.120]  smiled at him and said, yes, counselor, as a matter of fact, he can.
[05:49.120 --> 05:54.640]  So I asked the prosecutor if he knew that there were other witnesses in this case, because
[05:54.640 --> 06:02.240]  his only witness is, I got him on the stand and got him to admit that he had 10 DUIs,
[06:02.240 --> 06:04.560]  and he swore he wasn't drinking that night.
[06:04.560 --> 06:07.280]  That was all I asked him, and that was it.
[06:07.280 --> 06:11.480]  So I get him on the stand, I ask him, were you aware that there were other witnesses
[06:11.480 --> 06:12.480]  to this occurrence?
[06:12.480 --> 06:13.480]  Yes, Mr. Skelton, I was.
[06:13.480 --> 06:15.080]  Did you talk to any of those witnesses?
[06:15.080 --> 06:16.640]  No, Mr. Skelton, I did not.
[06:16.640 --> 06:18.400]  Well, why didn't you?
[06:18.400 --> 06:20.960]  He said, well, Mr. Skelton, I didn't believe you.
[06:20.960 --> 06:25.480]  Well, the first question I asked him was, do you consider yourself an ethical attorney?
[06:25.480 --> 06:26.720]  Yes, Mr. Skelton, I do.
[06:26.720 --> 06:31.400]  And then I asked him about these witnesses, and he said he didn't believe me.
[06:31.400 --> 06:35.480]  So I said, are you familiar with the American Bar Association's standards for the prosecutorial
[06:35.480 --> 06:36.480]  function?
[06:36.480 --> 06:37.600]  Yes, Mr. Skelton, I am.
[06:37.600 --> 06:40.280]  Are you familiar with standard 3-3.11?
[06:40.280 --> 06:45.240]  No, Mr. Skelton, I'm not familiar with every single standard, well, let me familiarize
[06:45.240 --> 06:47.000]  you with it then.
[06:47.000 --> 06:53.360]  It says it is an ethical conduct for a prosecuting attorney to refrain from pursuing evidence,
[06:53.360 --> 06:57.680]  solely because the evidence will show the innocence of the accused or mitigate the guilt
[06:57.680 --> 06:59.680]  of the accused.
[06:59.680 --> 07:04.560]  Now, do you still consider yourself an ethical attorney?
[07:04.560 --> 07:11.280]  And his old bald head just glowed red and just sat there and glared at me.
[07:11.280 --> 07:18.360]  And I thought, if I have to go to jail over this, that was worth it.
[07:18.360 --> 07:22.400]  Read the standards you will be surprised.
[07:22.400 --> 07:26.080]  The judge has a duty to give notice.
[07:26.080 --> 07:27.080]  I'm sorry.
[07:27.080 --> 07:28.080]  Back up.
[07:28.080 --> 07:38.060]  The prosecutor has a duty to give notice to the judge when the judge is making an error.
[07:38.060 --> 07:44.640]  And the judge is forbidden to give legal advice to the accused.
[07:44.640 --> 07:52.760]  And he is forbidden to present false case law or inappropriate case law to the court,
[07:52.760 --> 07:55.600]  specifically in the standards.
[07:55.600 --> 08:01.200]  Most of what you've been talking about, they were doing the standards specifically prohibit.
[08:01.200 --> 08:07.680]  So read it, it'll be a nice thing to quote.
[08:07.680 --> 08:11.120]  It's your worth good for me in that case.
[08:11.120 --> 08:12.120]  The jury bought it.
[08:12.120 --> 08:19.320]  So I should think that I could read that and get their ethical standards, then tie their
[08:19.320 --> 08:25.560]  ethical standards to some sort of constitutional violation.
[08:25.560 --> 08:30.280]  Yes, it goes to never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[08:30.280 --> 08:39.320]  When you accuse the prosecutor of unethical conduct, you accuse him of unethical conduct
[08:39.320 --> 08:44.920]  as defined by the American Bar Association under the American Bar Association Standards
[08:44.920 --> 08:51.680]  with Prosecutoral Function, Standard 3- Whatever, which reads as follows.
[08:51.680 --> 08:57.800]  That gives, especially when that's on the record, that gives credence to what you say.
[08:57.800 --> 09:02.960]  Now he can stand up and say that the American Bar Association Standards and Prosecutoral
[09:02.960 --> 09:06.120]  Function were never adopted by the state.
[09:06.120 --> 09:11.040]  I have never had a prosecutor try that.
[09:11.040 --> 09:16.640]  They keep their mouth shut.
[09:16.640 --> 09:18.040]  So this will give you a lot.
[09:18.040 --> 09:21.640]  You'll be surprised what is in there.
[09:21.640 --> 09:25.120]  There's not that much you have to look at.
[09:25.120 --> 09:31.120]  There are standards in there that go to how prosecutors deal with law firms, how they
[09:31.120 --> 09:37.240]  deal with judges, all kinds of administrative stuff that you don't care about.
[09:37.240 --> 09:43.160]  The American Bar Association Standards, you only care about the first two chapters.
[09:43.160 --> 09:48.840]  The rest of it is lawyer to lawyer stuff and administrative stuff.
[09:48.840 --> 09:53.360]  If just these first two chapters is not that much, you read through those.
[09:53.360 --> 09:57.840]  You will be astounded at what you find in there.
[09:57.840 --> 10:05.280]  Then when you make an accusation against the lawyer, you don't just say what is wrong.
[10:05.280 --> 10:09.160]  You quote the standard that says it's wrong.
[10:09.160 --> 10:14.440]  And it doesn't matter if you're quoting the American Bar Association Standards.
[10:14.440 --> 10:20.000]  47 of 50 states have adopted the standards and then made their own adjustments.
[10:20.000 --> 10:23.880]  The three that didn't adopt the standards, if you read through their standards, they
[10:23.880 --> 10:27.760]  look just like the American Bar Association Standards.
[10:27.760 --> 10:30.920]  What's wrong for an attorney to do with one state's wrong in all the states?
[10:30.920 --> 10:34.200]  So you can quote American Bar Association.
[10:34.200 --> 10:39.040]  And if they want to gripe about it, so well, you want me to look it up in the state standards.
[10:39.040 --> 10:40.040]  I can do that.
[10:40.040 --> 10:42.320]  Give me a moment, Judge.
[10:42.320 --> 10:43.600]  I'll get in the state standard.
[10:43.600 --> 10:51.080]  I've never had an attorney object because I'm quoting American Bar Association Standards.
[10:51.080 --> 10:58.480]  They standard and keep their mouth shut because of places they don't want to go.
[10:58.480 --> 11:02.240]  They do not want you to bring the state standard and they're going to keep their mouth shut.
[11:02.240 --> 11:07.840]  And it's easier to do American Bar Association Standards because it's really general and
[11:07.840 --> 11:10.080]  it applies everywhere.
[11:10.080 --> 11:11.080]  But read through it quickly.
[11:11.080 --> 11:15.520]  It'll only take you a couple of hours to go through both of them.
[11:15.520 --> 11:21.000]  I go in the court and I know their standards better than they do and I read them a couple
[11:21.000 --> 11:22.000]  of times.
[11:22.000 --> 11:23.000]  That's all it took.
[11:23.000 --> 11:25.680]  These guys never read them.
[11:25.680 --> 11:34.200]  And when you start sticking their standards down their throats, lawyers just get flustered.
[11:34.200 --> 11:37.120]  They don't know what to do.
[11:37.120 --> 11:42.960]  Okay, one question.
[11:42.960 --> 11:47.960]  My strategy is because these abusive process, they happen on different dates.
[11:47.960 --> 11:52.840]  So that means that they're a different lawsuit, right?
[11:52.840 --> 11:53.840]  Absolutely.
[11:53.840 --> 11:54.840]  Separate occurrence.
[11:54.840 --> 11:55.840]  Okay.
[11:55.840 --> 12:02.960]  Separate occurrence, a separate lawsuit unless you do a RICO in which you conglomerate all
[12:02.960 --> 12:03.960]  of them.
[12:03.960 --> 12:10.800]  But otherwise, each separate tort is a separate lawsuit.
[12:10.800 --> 12:20.440]  Now, they may move for Joinder and say that all of these actions are similar enough that
[12:20.440 --> 12:23.080]  they should all be heard at one time.
[12:23.080 --> 12:27.120]  If the lawyer's gotten a sense, that's what it'll do.
[12:27.120 --> 12:35.440]  But from your perspective, it makes it harder for them to rule against you because you had
[12:35.440 --> 12:37.120]  all these different suits in there.
[12:37.120 --> 12:40.240]  Not if I don't file them at the same time, right?
[12:40.240 --> 12:41.880]  Because I have a year.
[12:41.880 --> 12:42.880]  Well, even if you...
[12:42.880 --> 12:47.400]  Well, it depends on how far apart they are.
[12:47.400 --> 12:53.080]  If they're too far apart, then they can't effectively join them all together.
[12:53.080 --> 12:54.080]  Okay.
[12:54.080 --> 13:00.000]  Because if you're just starting one and you got the motions to dismiss going on, you got
[13:00.000 --> 13:06.760]  another one over here that's halfway through discovery, it's ineffective to try to join
[13:06.760 --> 13:07.760]  those.
[13:07.760 --> 13:14.000]  How about if it's on the same issue?
[13:14.000 --> 13:19.840]  If it's on the same issue, a lot of times they're going to want to join.
[13:19.840 --> 13:22.760]  Not the same issues.
[13:22.760 --> 13:26.920]  But if they're different issues, there's no joiner.
[13:26.920 --> 13:27.920]  Okay.
[13:27.920 --> 13:36.120]  And the only way they can join them is if you're adjudicating an issue in this court
[13:36.120 --> 13:42.440]  and you have the same issue claimed in two or three other cases, then under judicial
[13:42.440 --> 13:49.200]  economy we can bring all these together and argue this issue one time for all the cases.
[13:49.200 --> 13:54.680]  But if each of the cases have different issues, they can't join them.
[13:54.680 --> 13:59.320]  They may try to because if they got a corrupt judge, they're going to want to join them
[13:59.320 --> 14:03.680]  all under one corrupt judge, but you fight that.
[14:03.680 --> 14:05.680]  All right.
[14:05.680 --> 14:07.120]  All right.
[14:07.120 --> 14:13.280]  I just wanted to chime in and let you keep me informed.
[14:13.280 --> 14:14.280]  This is good.
[14:14.280 --> 14:22.760]  Especially for me, this is good because frankly, there were times there I was concerned that
[14:22.760 --> 14:29.360]  you were going to wind up in jail for a long time and you made me nervous, but you worked
[14:29.360 --> 14:30.520]  your way through it.
[14:30.520 --> 14:35.840]  Now you're out the other side and I could not be more pleased.
[14:35.840 --> 14:37.640]  Appreciate it.
[14:37.640 --> 14:38.640]  Okay.
[14:38.640 --> 14:40.640]  Thank you and keep it up.
[14:40.640 --> 14:41.640]  All right.
[14:41.640 --> 14:42.640]  Okay.
[14:42.640 --> 14:46.080]  Now we're going to William in Texas.
[14:46.080 --> 14:47.080]  Hello, William.
[14:47.080 --> 14:48.080]  Good evening, Randy.
[14:48.080 --> 14:49.080]  How are you doing?
[14:49.080 --> 14:50.080]  I'm doing good.
[14:50.080 --> 14:51.080]  What do you have for us today?
[14:51.080 --> 15:01.080]  Well, when I heard you asked for people to get involved in getting the citations in
[15:01.080 --> 15:05.880]  their area, I did not know how much paperwork you were going to get me into.
[15:05.880 --> 15:08.880]  You go ahead and laugh.
[15:08.880 --> 15:14.160]  All right, I sent the information off on July 7th.
[15:14.160 --> 15:15.560]  It was real simple.
[15:15.560 --> 15:21.360]  Just give me the citations from July 1st to July 31st on a weekly basis.
[15:21.360 --> 15:27.360]  I then received an answer back from the judge of the municipal court, which stated that
[15:27.360 --> 15:30.800]  it was judicial records and he was denied it.
[15:30.800 --> 15:38.680]  However, I may have a common law right and in order to inspect certain documents, I would
[15:38.680 --> 15:42.120]  need to get a hold of his clerk, which means I'd have to send another request.
[15:42.120 --> 15:46.320]  But I have to send a request for the request that I've been requested.
[15:46.320 --> 15:49.400]  So I filed a bargree that's on him.
[15:49.400 --> 15:51.400]  I filed a judicial conduct.
[15:51.400 --> 15:58.640]  I filed an attorney general complaint in which I have answers.
[15:58.640 --> 16:09.040]  The attorney general under 552.3215 is sending the information for a writ of mandamus and
[16:09.040 --> 16:13.560]  I have to wait until I hear back from who they sent that to.
[16:13.560 --> 16:20.920]  The bar sent me a nice little letter saying that they found that this was a judge and
[16:20.920 --> 16:26.280]  what they were doing is they're going to send it to the state commission on judicial conduct
[16:26.280 --> 16:32.440]  and then the judge sent it to the city attorney and then the city attorney sends me this email
[16:32.440 --> 16:35.920]  saying, oh, I hear the music.
[16:35.920 --> 16:42.720]  Okay, so he, you went after him and now he can hear the music.
[16:42.720 --> 16:43.720]  Or we're going to break.
[16:43.720 --> 17:02.120]  And so we had to wait.
[17:02.120 --> 17:06.120]  Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers. No, these are yucky cookies.
[17:06.120 --> 17:09.120]  Cookie? Yucky? No, no bad cookies.
[17:09.120 --> 17:12.120]  You can't even eat these cookies. These are cyber cookies.
[17:12.120 --> 17:13.120]  No, can't eat?
[17:13.120 --> 17:16.120]  No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:16.120 --> 17:17.120]  These have apples.
[17:17.120 --> 17:20.120]  Really? Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:20.120 --> 17:22.120]  Hmm, yummy apple.
[17:22.120 --> 17:26.120]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:26.120 --> 17:32.120]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:32.120 --> 17:34.120]  Bye-bye, yucky cookies.
[17:34.120 --> 17:40.120]  Now I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side,
[17:40.120 --> 17:46.120]  bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[17:46.120 --> 17:48.120]  New cookies? For me?
[17:48.120 --> 17:50.120]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:50.120 --> 17:57.120]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[17:57.120 --> 17:58.120]  These are cookies.
[17:58.120 --> 18:00.120]  These are classified.
[18:00.120 --> 18:05.120]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.120 --> 18:09.120]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method.
[18:09.120 --> 18:14.120]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:14.120 --> 18:20.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[18:20.120 --> 18:24.120]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[18:24.120 --> 18:26.120]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:26.120 --> 18:29.120]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[18:29.120 --> 18:33.120]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:33.120 --> 18:38.120]  The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.120 --> 18:41.120]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.120 --> 18:49.120]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.120 --> 19:11.120]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:11.120 --> 19:20.120]  Well, don't let nothing get to you, only the father can deliver you. Well, don't let bad mind people hurt you.
[19:20.120 --> 19:23.120]  I'm gonna say something, get behind.
[19:23.120 --> 19:28.120]  You know what I mean? My friend, Nala Jachin.
[19:28.120 --> 19:41.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to William in Texas.
[19:41.120 --> 19:52.120]  And just so everybody knows, we were doing this ticket thing and we're trying to get what they call a lawyer list.
[19:52.120 --> 20:01.120]  And these jurisdictions make up a list of everybody who got a ticket and they email them to these lawyers who represent people with tickets.
[20:01.120 --> 20:06.120]  And so that's what William was asking for.
[20:06.120 --> 20:14.120]  So this is not about a case he's in. This is just somebody sending in a request for some information.
[20:14.120 --> 20:18.120]  And this is what's happening to them.
[20:18.120 --> 20:21.120]  Okay, go ahead, William.
[20:21.120 --> 20:25.120]  Okay, so I sent off the information. I got the denial back from the judge.
[20:25.120 --> 20:32.120]  I did the bar grievance, which the bar grievance has now sent to the state commission on judicial conduct.
[20:32.120 --> 20:37.120]  And they say that for any, if there's anything else, don't bother them.
[20:37.120 --> 20:40.120]  Contact the state commission on judicial conduct.
[20:40.120 --> 20:51.120]  I've contacted the attorney general and they said they're moving it to the group. The PIR required to provide statements giving you basis for such determination.
[20:51.120 --> 20:57.120]  Pursuant to 552321. You have to file with the district attorney.
[20:57.120 --> 21:01.120]  I did. I filed a criminal complaint with the district attorney.
[21:01.120 --> 21:08.120]  I have yet to hear anything back from them, but I did hear back from the city attorney.
[21:08.120 --> 21:12.120]  And in his email, he didn't send me a letter. He sent me an email.
[21:12.120 --> 21:28.120]  So Mr. Garner's limited evidence of the Texas practice was insufficient to establish a right under the First Amendment to inspect citations and automated court case filing information, which would be the lawyer's list.
[21:28.120 --> 21:39.120]  Because he failed to even allege that the other municipalities provide access to such documents within business hours or in 10 days of a PIR filing.
[21:39.120 --> 21:45.120]  And the right to immediate access to certain types of court records was not established.
[21:45.120 --> 21:51.120]  Okay. This is the part I wanted to get to.
[21:51.120 --> 21:58.120]  This guy is a prosecutor. He's the attorney.
[21:58.120 --> 22:02.120]  Oh, okay. Good. Good. Because that's where I was going to.
[22:02.120 --> 22:13.120]  He has advised the city to take an action that's likely to lead to litigation.
[22:13.120 --> 22:22.120]  And if it does go to litigation, since he is the city attorney, he would represent the city in the litigation.
[22:22.120 --> 22:33.120]  Okay. Do you know what that's called in the Texas penal code?
[22:33.120 --> 22:39.120]  That's called baritry. It is the felony in Texas.
[22:39.120 --> 22:47.120]  You're a lawyer. If you're a lawyer, you advise your client to take an action that leads to litigation that you then get to represent.
[22:47.120 --> 22:50.120]  That's baritry. And that's the felony in Texas.
[22:50.120 --> 22:56.120]  Chapter 38, I think it's 38.121.
[22:56.120 --> 23:01.120]  Texas is the only state that has baritry laws.
[23:01.120 --> 23:05.120]  And they are serious.
[23:05.120 --> 23:17.120]  The reason I said about prosecutor, even if he was the prosecutor, when he's giving the city legal advice, he has no immunity.
[23:17.120 --> 23:25.120]  If you send a, give a information request to a JP and they send it to the county attorney.
[23:25.120 --> 23:33.120]  And the county attorney writes them a response. That's illegal advice. He's not being a prosecutor. No immunity.
[23:33.120 --> 23:36.120]  I once went to my county attorney.
[23:36.120 --> 23:47.120]  I went to sheriff's and went to a, my local police department to file a complaint on my niece's estranged husband because he's acting ignorant and I'm trying to get him to calm him down.
[23:47.120 --> 23:52.120]  They wouldn't take, they took my complaint, but they didn't give it to the magistrate.
[23:52.120 --> 23:58.120]  So I went to the chief and he said, well, I talked to the county attorney and he told me not to.
[23:58.120 --> 24:03.120]  I said, right here, don't go anywhere. We're not done.
[24:03.120 --> 24:07.120]  I jump in the car and I head for the county attorney's office.
[24:07.120 --> 24:13.120]  Well, the chief of police knew where I was going. So he called him first.
[24:13.120 --> 24:20.120]  The county attorney met me in the hallway and he said, Mr. Skelton, I know why you're here.
[24:20.120 --> 24:25.120]  Do you think I am out of my professional mind?
[24:25.120 --> 24:33.120]  Do you really think I would waive my sovereign immunity by giving legal advice to the police?
[24:33.120 --> 24:39.120]  I said, well, I don't know. I'm just following the thunder here, James.
[24:39.120 --> 24:43.120]  So I go, I go back to the police department and knock on the door.
[24:43.120 --> 24:47.120]  This cop opens the door and he said, can I help you, Mr. Kelton?
[24:47.120 --> 24:57.120]  I said, yes, tell your chief that James State and the county attorney just threw him under the bus and I'm here to run him over with it.
[24:57.120 --> 25:00.120]  And the cop said, well, I'll make you a deal.
[25:00.120 --> 25:05.120]  I said, what's that? I'll let you in on the condition that I get to watch.
[25:05.120 --> 25:10.120]  I said, by all means and take home movies if you want to.
[25:10.120 --> 25:16.120]  But that was very telling from the prosecuting attorney.
[25:16.120 --> 25:22.120]  He knew full well when he's giving legal advice. He is bare game.
[25:22.120 --> 25:32.120]  Anyway, so I'm suggesting because the arguments that he made.
[25:32.120 --> 25:35.120]  They're relevant.
[25:35.120 --> 25:39.120]  The law is what the law is.
[25:39.120 --> 25:45.120]  Whether you cite the law to the prosecutor or not is not relevant.
[25:45.120 --> 25:51.120]  If the law says you must do this thing, then you must do this thing.
[25:51.120 --> 25:59.120]  You don't only do this thing if somebody tells you you have to do this thing.
[25:59.120 --> 26:03.120]  This is an argument I'm making on examining trials.
[26:03.120 --> 26:27.120]  Under Clark v. State, the court ruled that you only have a right to an examining trial in a felony because 16.01 Texas code grabber procedure says that you in the matter of a felony, you have a right to an examining trial before indictment.
[26:27.120 --> 26:33.120]  So they took that to mean that you can only have an examining trial if it's a felony.
[26:33.120 --> 26:36.120]  Now I said, whoa, whoa, hold on.
[26:36.120 --> 26:50.120]  The code says that when a police officer arrests you with or without a warrant, he is to take you directly to the nearest magistrate and the magistrate is to hold an examining trial.
[26:50.120 --> 27:01.120]  What part of that is hard to understand doesn't have anything to do with whether or not I tell them what the code says.
[27:01.120 --> 27:11.120]  It orders him and has nothing to do with whether or not I have a right to an examining trial.
[27:11.120 --> 27:24.120]  The officer has a statutory duty, both the arresting officer and the magistrate to hold an examining trial, whether I tell them or not.
[27:24.120 --> 27:36.120]  And so this lawyer is arguing that since you didn't brief out your position to him, he can ignore the underlying law.
[27:36.120 --> 27:44.120]  Well, the technical term, legal term for that is horse manure.
[27:44.120 --> 27:47.120]  You don't have to do any such thing.
[27:47.120 --> 27:56.120]  My information requests, they say you are here by directed to provide for my inspection and are copying all of the following.
[27:56.120 --> 28:00.120]  I don't quote any code at all.
[28:00.120 --> 28:06.120]  So they don't get to say, well, you asked for it under the open records act and these are court records, they don't fall under the open records act.
[28:06.120 --> 28:12.120]  Well, you asked for it under the rules of court and they don't fall under the rules of court, they fall under the open records act.
[28:12.120 --> 28:14.120]  Heck, we're on that court.
[28:14.120 --> 28:22.120]  You just give me the records and I'll come back at you with whatever code applies.
[28:22.120 --> 28:32.120]  And so this lawyer has clearly advised his client to do something that will deny you in the due course of the law.
[28:32.120 --> 28:34.120]  That's where it goes to.
[28:34.120 --> 28:46.120]  If they don't hold an examining trial, you may not have a statutory right to an examining trial, but you have a statutory right to the due course of the laws.
[28:46.120 --> 28:51.120]  I'm sorry, you have a constitutional right to the due course of the law.
[28:51.120 --> 28:58.120]  And if a law establishes a procedure, that procedure becomes due course.
[28:58.120 --> 29:04.120]  They can't dance around it and the open records act is very clear.
[29:04.120 --> 29:10.120]  They have a section that stipulates what's not open for public inspection.
[29:10.120 --> 29:20.120]  Everything else is the letter from the lawyer did not stipulate a specific exception.
[29:20.120 --> 29:26.120]  It's garbage and it advises his client to do something that will get his client's suit.
[29:26.120 --> 29:27.120]  This is barituary.
[29:27.120 --> 29:28.120]  You need to file.
[29:28.120 --> 29:37.120]  Look up the barituary laws, chapter 38, penal code, and you'll like what you see.
[29:37.120 --> 29:41.120]  I've got a couple more things and then I'll go on.
[29:41.120 --> 29:42.120]  You got the music?
[29:42.120 --> 29:43.120]  Okay.
[29:43.120 --> 29:44.120]  Hang on.
[29:44.120 --> 29:45.120]  I hear the music.
[29:45.120 --> 29:53.120]  Let's let the music play, Randy Kelton, Rue of Law Radio, or call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:53.120 --> 30:01.120]  We'll be right back.
[30:01.120 --> 30:06.120]  Here in the US, you can name your child pretty much anything you want, but creative naming
[30:06.120 --> 30:10.120]  and weird spelling won't fly in other parts of the world.
[30:10.120 --> 30:15.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with some surprising laws about baby names.
[30:41.120 --> 30:46.120]  Is it a girl or a boy?
[30:46.120 --> 30:50.120]  In Denmark and Germany, you should be able to tell by the baby's name.
[30:50.120 --> 30:51.120]  It's the law.
[30:51.120 --> 30:56.120]  For example, the name Matty is verboten in Germany because it could cause gender confusion.
[30:56.120 --> 31:00.120]  Several countries won't allow names considered harmful to a child's self-image.
[31:00.120 --> 31:05.120]  The names Adolf Hitler and Satan are banned in New Zealand, which might be understandable.
[31:05.120 --> 31:10.120]  But fans of the king of rock and roll might wonder why the name Elvis has been rejected in Sweden.
[31:10.120 --> 31:16.120]  What's not surprising is that Chinese baby naming laws reflect the country's control agenda.
[31:16.120 --> 31:23.120]  Parents must give newborns names that can be easily scanned by a computer for the country's national ID card program.
[31:23.120 --> 31:25.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:25.120 --> 31:30.120]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.120 --> 31:36.120]  Did you know there are 3 million edible food plants on Earth and none have the nutritional value of the hemp plant?
[31:36.120 --> 31:39.120]  HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:39.120 --> 31:41.120]  It does not contain chemicals or THC.
[31:41.120 --> 31:44.120]  It's non-GMO and is 100% gluten-free.
[31:44.120 --> 31:51.120]  Hemp protein powder burns fat, fills muscle, contains 53% protein and feeds the body the nutrients it needs.
[31:51.120 --> 31:57.120]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you.
[31:57.120 --> 32:00.120]  Only HempUSA.org.
[32:27.120 --> 32:32.120]  This is a video with a function with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.120 --> 32:37.120]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:37.120 --> 32:42.120]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:42.120 --> 32:46.120]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus The Lie.
[32:46.120 --> 32:52.120]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:52.120 --> 32:56.120]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:56.120 --> 33:01.120]  And at Free Society we all want and deserve.
[33:01.120 --> 33:06.120]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:06.120 --> 33:10.120]  1. The Texas Transportation Code
[33:10.120 --> 33:14.120]  2. The Texas Transportation Code
[33:14.120 --> 33:18.120]  3. The Texas Transportation Code
[33:18.120 --> 33:22.120]  4. The Texas Transportation Code
[33:22.120 --> 33:27.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio and William.
[33:27.120 --> 33:33.120]  You got the documents off the traffic ticket website, didn't you?
[33:33.120 --> 33:39.120]  Oh, hold on. We can hear you better if I unmute you.
[33:39.120 --> 33:41.120]  There you go.
[33:41.120 --> 33:45.120]  No, I haven't received those yet.
[33:45.120 --> 33:48.120]  Did you order them?
[33:48.120 --> 33:55.120]  No, I did when you were asking people to send in, see if you could stumble it up.
[33:55.120 --> 33:59.120]  But something got lost in the email. It's no big deal.
[33:59.120 --> 34:04.120]  Okay, put it back in. Let me send them to you. They're great fun.
[34:04.120 --> 34:12.120]  Now, I wanted to point out, when the judge sent me his answer, I already had,
[34:12.120 --> 34:16.120]  he told me I could go and appeal it to the administrative director.
[34:16.120 --> 34:21.120]  Well, I already had the same ruling from the administrative director.
[34:21.120 --> 34:30.120]  In fact, I have 11.004 on record, and that was from Rusk when they refused to provide me my own court records.
[34:30.120 --> 34:34.120]  And then I have another one that was on file, and that was for Steamville.
[34:34.120 --> 34:38.120]  So I already knew that these records are available to the public.
[34:38.120 --> 34:47.120]  And then where he goes to the First Amendment, well, that is a Texas Appeal San Antonio 1990s case
[34:47.120 --> 34:55.120]  that I put into my answer, and it states the public's right to public trials under the first 14th Amendment
[34:55.120 --> 35:03.120]  to the United States Constitution includes the presumption that judicial records will be open to inspection by the press and the public.
[35:03.120 --> 35:06.120]  And that was a Texas Appeals.
[35:06.120 --> 35:18.120]  And then what I wanted to ask you is, how do you feel about a negligence per se ruling, since there is a statutory requirement for the open records?
[35:18.120 --> 35:22.120]  There are certain rules and guidelines.
[35:22.120 --> 35:28.120]  Negligent per se. I've never heard it put that way.
[35:28.120 --> 35:41.120]  It's underneath Texas causes of action, negligence per se.
[35:41.120 --> 35:50.120]  Well, I'm familiar with negligence per se, but never in a court ruling.
[35:50.120 --> 35:52.120]  Well, this wasn't a court ruling.
[35:52.120 --> 35:56.120]  This was a judge just deciding that he was custodian of the records.
[35:56.120 --> 36:05.120]  Okay, you said an administrative ruling, but it really doesn't go to negligence.
[36:05.120 --> 36:18.120]  I have to go back and reread the definition of negligence, but this is not something where he was negligent and a bad thing happened.
[36:18.120 --> 36:30.120]  This was a proactive intentional act, and that doesn't go to negligence. That falls more under fraud.
[36:30.120 --> 36:36.120]  Well, there's only the four elements, and the four is the plaintiff belongs to a class of person.
[36:36.120 --> 36:43.120]  The statute was designed to protect, and her injury is of the type the statute was designed to prevent.
[36:43.120 --> 36:48.120]  Two, the statute is one for which tort liability may be imposed when in violated.
[36:48.120 --> 36:59.120]  Three, the defendant violated the statute without excuse, and four, the defendant acted or omissioned, proximally, cause the plaintiff injury.
[36:59.120 --> 37:08.120]  Okay, that is a focused...that's not just a general negligent cause of action. Where did you find that?
[37:08.120 --> 37:12.120]  A lot of digging and a lot of listening to you.
[37:12.120 --> 37:21.120]  That is good. That goes specifically to judges and rulings or administrators and rulings.
[37:21.120 --> 37:31.120]  Yeah, negligence per se applies when the courts have determined that the violation of a particular state, I mean, statute is negligence as a matter of law.
[37:31.120 --> 37:52.120]  Three, Patriot versus Garcia, four, three, six, Southwest, 2D, 897, 900, Texas, 1969. In these situations, the standard of care is defined by the statute itself rather than by the reasonable, prudent person standard.
[37:52.120 --> 37:57.120]  Can you send that to me? I would like to study that.
[37:57.120 --> 38:02.120]  Sure. I can send you what I've got in the causes of action.
[38:02.120 --> 38:09.120]  Yeah, and my plagiarism spidey senses tingling.
[38:09.120 --> 38:14.120]  Oh, well, it gives jury charges, authorities, and everything. That's why I was asking you.
[38:14.120 --> 38:24.120]  But what I'm waiting for is I've already got a criminal complaint on it. I don't really want to start a civil complaint if that's going to interfere with the criminal complaint.
[38:24.120 --> 38:34.120]  It won't. They don't have anything to do. The other side will try to combine them together, but you'll object to that.
[38:34.120 --> 38:49.120]  You don't have any standing in the criminal complaint. It's your duty to give notice. Your duty to give notice of crime is not negated by civil action.
[38:49.120 --> 38:58.120]  They're going to whine double jeopardy. No, it's not double jeopardy. You committed a crime and that harmed the state.
[38:58.120 --> 39:07.120]  The actions that you took caused a tort against me. They're totally separate.
[39:07.120 --> 39:15.120]  I'll send you a copy of this right out of the book. It's a couple of pages, so let me scan them in so that you can see all of it.
[39:15.120 --> 39:22.120]  And that's about all I've got. And then once you can read this, let me know what your thoughts are on it.
[39:22.120 --> 39:26.120]  Oh, I think I'm going to have a whole lot of fun with this.
[39:26.120 --> 39:28.120]  Okay.
[39:28.120 --> 39:34.120]  Oh, I always like it when a caller comes in and knows more than I do.
[39:34.120 --> 39:39.120]  Well, I will do that for you. I'm still learning.
[39:39.120 --> 39:42.120]  Thank you very much, William.
[39:42.120 --> 39:44.120]  All right. Thank you, Randy. Have a good evening.
[39:44.120 --> 39:49.120]  Okay. And now we're going to go to Jermaine in Tennessee. Hello, Jermaine.
[39:49.120 --> 39:53.120]  Hello.
[39:53.120 --> 39:57.120]  Okay. You have horrible background noise.
[39:57.120 --> 39:59.120]  Hey, Randy. Can you hear me now?
[39:59.120 --> 40:02.120]  Oh, much better. Much better.
[40:02.120 --> 40:11.120]  Hey, you know what? We talked last week about my mom's situation on that basis. I got her on the phone right now.
[40:11.120 --> 40:17.120]  Did you get me all of the documents from the county recorder's office?
[40:17.120 --> 40:23.120]  No, I didn't know what she needed. So I told her for her to call and talk to you.
[40:23.120 --> 40:30.120]  So you could direct to her what she would need to go get at the county recorder's office or how to get it.
[40:30.120 --> 40:44.120]  Okay. We need every document, the county recorder, and when I say county recorder, that also includes registrar of deeds, depending on what it's called in a particular jurisdiction.
[40:44.120 --> 40:53.120]  I need everything that has been filed in the public record since your mother received a warranty deed on the property.
[40:53.120 --> 40:56.120]  Sure.
[40:56.120 --> 40:58.120]  Couldn't hear that.
[40:58.120 --> 41:05.120]  Okay. How was she go about, what does she need to request?
[41:05.120 --> 41:19.120]  I have a procedure that I usually do. I go to the clerk and tell the clerk that, you know, I'm old and I am computer intolerant.
[41:19.120 --> 41:32.120]  So can you run a search on this property and give me a list of everything that's been filed since I received a warranty deed on this date?
[41:32.120 --> 41:36.120]  And that'll be the closing date on the purchase of the property.
[41:36.120 --> 41:40.120]  And then the clerk will give you a list.
[41:40.120 --> 41:44.120]  Yeah. Keep that list. Don't let anything happen to it.
[41:44.120 --> 41:50.120]  Because that list is what the clerk can find.
[41:50.120 --> 42:01.120]  If there's any other documents filed in the record and the clerk didn't find them, you don't want to find them.
[42:01.120 --> 42:05.120]  You might want to know they're there, but you officially do not want to find them.
[42:05.120 --> 42:13.120]  Because if the clerk can't find them, then the presumption is that they're not properly filed.
[42:13.120 --> 42:24.120]  So once you get all those documents, once you get the list, then you ask the clerk if the clerk can print you out a copy of each one.
[42:24.120 --> 42:31.120]  Or if you want to save some money and you got a cell phone, and you got a 10-year-old who can show you how to use a computer,
[42:31.120 --> 42:37.120]  just pull them up on the computer and photograph them with your phone.
[42:37.120 --> 42:43.120]  They've actually got some really nice scanning apps if you have a smartphone.
[42:43.120 --> 42:48.120]  But I need copies of all of the documents that have been filed.
[42:48.120 --> 42:52.120]  Okay. Now I'll explain what I'm looking for.
[42:52.120 --> 42:59.120]  A couple questions. How old is the original mortgage?
[42:59.120 --> 43:06.120]  Hold on. I had you muted because I had so much background noise. Okay, go ahead.
[43:06.120 --> 43:08.120]  1988.
[43:08.120 --> 43:15.120]  1988. Oh, they really want to foreclose on this one because there's lots of equity.
[43:15.120 --> 43:21.120]  We're going to talk about something else when we're done here, and that's overage.
[43:21.120 --> 43:30.120]  Okay, 1988. What was the original principle in interest?
[43:30.120 --> 43:38.120]  The principle was $44,000, and the interest was 10 and a half.
[43:38.120 --> 43:49.120]  Wow, 10 and a half? In 1988, that is an outrageous amount of interest.
[43:49.120 --> 44:00.120]  Okay, but if you had the audacity to be black and poor...
[44:50.120 --> 44:54.120] ...and remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[44:54.120 --> 45:20.120]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[45:24.120 --> 45:34.120]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[45:54.120 --> 46:02.120]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:24.120 --> 46:33.120] ...always, I must be careful what I'm wishing for when I'm hungry.
[46:33.120 --> 46:39.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton will leave our radio, and we're talking to Jermaine in Tennessee.
[46:39.120 --> 46:45.120]  And Jermaine, we're going to do the short course on foreclosure.
[46:45.120 --> 46:53.120]  Okay, what were there any refinances on this mortgage?
[46:53.120 --> 46:55.120]  There was one.
[46:55.120 --> 46:59.120]  When was the refinance?
[46:59.120 --> 47:02.120]  In 2001.
[47:02.120 --> 47:08.120]  And what was the mortgage in interest?
[47:08.120 --> 47:17.120]  The interest went up to 11 and a half, and the mortgage doubled.
[47:17.120 --> 47:22.120]  Okay, so you pulled equity out of the house.
[47:22.120 --> 47:33.120]  Okay, what is the current fair market value of the house?
[47:33.120 --> 47:43.120]  $53,000. It actually decreased.
[47:43.120 --> 47:49.120]  So you were upside down.
[47:49.120 --> 48:00.120]  Okay, my short answer is you're better off losing the property.
[48:00.120 --> 48:06.120]  However, you still might be able to sting them.
[48:06.120 --> 48:17.120]  What was the fair market value of the property when they did the refinance?
[48:17.120 --> 48:26.120]  It was $70,000 or $80,000.
[48:26.120 --> 48:30.120]  We had $80,000 bubbles.
[48:30.120 --> 48:41.120]  It actually decreased down to $50,000. I don't know how that did that.
[48:41.120 --> 48:51.120]  Okay, then you're out from under an unconscionable debt. 11.5% is absolutely outrageous.
[48:51.120 --> 48:57.120]  Okay, now let's look and see how we can go back and beat them up.
[48:57.120 --> 49:02.120]  Let me give you the short course on what to look for.
[49:02.120 --> 49:11.120]  Once the 2001, there will have been a lot.
[49:11.120 --> 49:19.120]  I'm going to mute your mic because I'm getting some really ugly feedback.
[49:19.120 --> 49:23.120]  Okay, what happened in the year 2000?
[49:23.120 --> 49:30.120]  The banksters figured out a really good scam where they can make a whole lot of money.
[49:30.120 --> 49:35.120]  They would mortgage these properties and then take a whole bunch of these mortgages
[49:35.120 --> 49:47.120]  and group them together into a pool and then sell investment in the pool.
[49:47.120 --> 49:57.120]  In order to do that, they had to get rid of the Glass-Steel Act and the prohibition on derivatives.
[49:57.120 --> 50:03.120]  These were prohibitions that were put in after the Great Depression to prevent that kind of thing from happening again.
[50:03.120 --> 50:10.120]  Well, in the late 90s, the banksters got the Glass-Steel Act overturned.
[50:10.120 --> 50:17.120]  The last thing the legislature did in 1999 when it closed, signed die,
[50:17.120 --> 50:22.120]  was overturn the prohibition against derivatives trading.
[50:22.120 --> 50:29.120]  They opened the door for the same kind of market crash that happened in 1929.
[50:29.120 --> 50:39.120]  They started bundling together all of these notes into a pool and then it sell percentages of that pool to investors.
[50:39.120 --> 50:52.120]  You have these long-term indebtedness, these long-term notes, and they had a lot of retirement funds, which are long-term investments.
[50:52.120 --> 50:54.120]  So they fit perfectly together.
[50:54.120 --> 51:01.120]  So primarily they sold these to companies that had an investment pool.
[51:01.120 --> 51:15.120]  Well, they made so much profit selling these mortgages into these pools that they figured out this really neat scam.
[51:15.120 --> 51:23.120]  They could take this mortgage and sell it into this pool over here.
[51:23.120 --> 51:31.120]  And then they take the same documentation and change the interest rate and stick it in another pool, sell it again.
[51:31.120 --> 51:36.120]  Each time they get 103% of the original principal.
[51:36.120 --> 51:42.120]  China accused Bank of America of selling at the same note 20 times.
[51:42.120 --> 51:48.120]  So what they do is they got your notes sold several times.
[51:48.120 --> 51:56.120]  Every time you make a payment, they make a payment to all of these other people that they've sold the note to.
[51:56.120 --> 52:04.120]  They want you to pay for 10 to 12 years, then they want to foreclose.
[52:04.120 --> 52:15.120]  So they watch for a couple of slow pays when you do a calculation on what they're charging you.
[52:15.120 --> 52:21.120]  I have a set of spreadsheets where I run some calculations.
[52:21.120 --> 52:27.120]  About 60% of the time they charge you more money than they agreed to.
[52:27.120 --> 52:33.120]  About 25% of the time they charge you less money than they agreed to.
[52:33.120 --> 52:36.120]  And charging you less money is worse than charging you more.
[52:36.120 --> 52:44.120]  I can almost assure you, if I run the numbers on your mortgage, they were charging you less than they should have.
[52:44.120 --> 52:50.120]  The reason they do that is they watch your payment history.
[52:50.120 --> 52:55.120]  Once you reach the 10 to 12 year mark, now they watch your payment history.
[52:55.120 --> 53:00.120]  If you're slow paid two months in a row, that means you're financially struggling.
[53:00.120 --> 53:06.120]  Then they come to you and they say, oh my goodness, we made a mistake.
[53:06.120 --> 53:12.120]  We didn't charge you enough. You got to pay us $20,000 and we're going to foreclose tomorrow.
[53:12.120 --> 53:16.120]  I've got a bunch of people that this happened to.
[53:16.120 --> 53:22.120]  They need to foreclose on the mortgage because they've sold it 10 times.
[53:22.120 --> 53:27.120]  And they've bought derivative insurance on it for each time they sold it.
[53:27.120 --> 53:31.120]  So they've got all these insurance policies.
[53:31.120 --> 53:36.120]  But the insurance only pays off 80% of the mortgage.
[53:36.120 --> 53:38.120]  So they want the mortgage paid down.
[53:38.120 --> 53:40.120]  So it looks clean.
[53:40.120 --> 53:47.120]  Once 80%, I'm sorry, 20% is paid off, 80% is left.
[53:47.120 --> 53:53.120]  Once it reaches that point, then they want to foreclose on you.
[53:53.120 --> 54:02.120]  And each of the investment pools that's purchased your note, they don't know about all the others.
[54:02.120 --> 54:06.120]  They're each one insured separately.
[54:06.120 --> 54:11.120]  So they foreclose on yours, they sell the property.
[54:11.120 --> 54:19.120]  Then they send the foreclosure to all of these other insurance companies and they collect 85% from each one.
[54:19.120 --> 54:23.120]  They walk away with a big jackpot.
[54:23.120 --> 54:30.120]  When I tell people that during this period bankers would write notes to anyone for any reason,
[54:30.120 --> 54:34.120]  they did not want you to pay those notes back.
[54:34.120 --> 54:37.120]  And on the surface, that doesn't make sense.
[54:37.120 --> 54:45.120]  But if they're selling you your note 10 times and they've got insurance on it in case it defaults,
[54:45.120 --> 54:52.120]  then they need you to default so they can collect all these insurance policies.
[54:52.120 --> 54:54.120]  Okay.
[54:54.120 --> 54:58.120]  Does that make sense?
[54:58.120 --> 55:09.120]  Yeah, I'm familiar with these derivatives, but actually my note, after my husband re-finance,
[55:09.120 --> 55:14.120]  the note was just in his name.
[55:14.120 --> 55:18.120]  I kept my name on the deed and they actually doubled.
[55:18.120 --> 55:25.120]  It went from $5 to $833 a month.
[55:25.120 --> 55:34.120]  Was it a variable interest?
[55:34.120 --> 55:39.120]  You said was it a fixed interest rate or variable?
[55:39.120 --> 55:42.120]  It was a fixed interest rate.
[55:42.120 --> 55:53.120]  It wasn't variable, but it was first with first horizon and they said they wouldn't sell the note,
[55:53.120 --> 56:00.120]  but they kept it a year and then we never really looked at the paperwork.
[56:00.120 --> 56:09.120]  But when I finally paid attention to the paperwork, they had at least five of the signatures on there
[56:09.120 --> 56:15.120]  and they can rescind it at any time and then keep the money.
[56:15.120 --> 56:24.120]  So I just figured they never gave him anything because he really only borrowed or supposedly borrowed $13,000.
[56:24.120 --> 56:34.120]  So they proposed to win and bought the original from the original mortgager and then supposedly had
[56:34.120 --> 56:37.120]  financed the whole thing back over again.
[56:37.120 --> 56:43.120]  I didn't know how to do it because he was only looking for $13,000 to repair his truck.
[56:43.120 --> 56:50.120]  The original mortgager was just for $13,000, but they said we had $65,000 of equity in our home dean.
[56:50.120 --> 56:53.120]  So it didn't make no sense.
[56:53.120 --> 57:00.120]  Well, they never loaned $65,000 and they said it's $70,000.
[57:00.120 --> 57:01.120]  They never loaned it.
[57:01.120 --> 57:05.120]  They only loaned him supposedly $13,000 for his truck.
[57:05.120 --> 57:14.120]  Okay, this would take an analysis of the note to see what actually went on.
[57:14.120 --> 57:17.120]  And I have some tools to do that with.
[57:17.120 --> 57:24.120]  But even without that issue, without bringing that issue, we'll get to that later.
[57:24.120 --> 57:35.120]  Since it was a refinance, there's a right to rescind and since it's already been foreclosed on, we're past that possibility.
[57:35.120 --> 57:40.120]  However, I need to see all of the assignments of the mortgage.
[57:40.120 --> 57:51.120]  One of the things I'm looking for, the original lender, they create all these notes and then these lenders go out of business.
[57:51.120 --> 58:01.120]  This was during one of the hottest periods in real estate history and these mortgage companies are going out of business.
[58:01.120 --> 58:07.120]  The reason they're going out of business is they're creating these predatory loans.
[58:07.120 --> 58:17.120]  They're selling them to investors at a loss, a show of loss on the sale.
[58:17.120 --> 58:21.120]  And then after they lose enough, then the company bankrupts and goes out of business.
[58:21.120 --> 58:32.120]  And what they wind up doing is bankrupting out all the high profits so that the actual backers of the note don't have to pay income tax on it.
[58:32.120 --> 58:34.120]  It was an income tax scam.
[58:34.120 --> 58:43.120]  But more than that, Washington Mutual was put out of business by the CIA.
[58:43.120 --> 58:48.120]  And what was happening?
[58:48.120 --> 59:14.120]  Two seconds.
[59:14.120 --> 59:21.120]  These are three volumes set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:21.120 --> 59:45.120]  Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church, to order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:45.120 --> 59:52.120]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:52.120 --> 01:00:00.120]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.120 --> 01:00:22.120]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:22.120 --> 01:00:33.120]  Today in History, the year 1938, an unprecedented swarm of grasshoppers descends on crops throughout the American heartland, devastating millions of acres.
[01:00:33.120 --> 01:00:41.120]  Iowa, Nebraska and South Dakota, already in the midst of a bad drought, suffered the most from this grasshopper disaster.
[01:00:41.120 --> 01:00:46.120]  Today in History.
[01:00:46.120 --> 01:01:01.120]  In recent news, yesterday Tuesday, police chiefs from three of the five biggest cities in the state spoke out at the Texas Capitol against the transgender bathroom bill being considered by the Republican legislator as discriminatory and in divergence of resources that won't keep people safe.
[01:01:01.120 --> 01:01:12.120]  The police chiefs were joined by public school officials, advocates for sexual assault survivors, representatives from the Harris County and El Paso Sheriff's offices, the Corpus Christi Ayes D. Chief of Police and others.
[01:01:12.120 --> 01:01:24.120]  The main issue, as Austin police chief Brian Manley put it, is that if, quote, a bill like this were to be passed, that would pull police officers time away from combating violent crime into enforcing a bathroom bill.
[01:01:24.120 --> 01:01:29.120]  It makes communities less safe, since it is time not spent ensuring community safety.
[01:01:29.120 --> 01:01:44.120]  The legislation which restricts bathroom use in schools and local government buildings by superseding and nullifying parts of local non-discrimination ordinances meant to allow transgender residents, which make up less than 1% of the population, the claim to use the public bathroom of their choice.
[01:01:44.120 --> 01:01:55.120]  The bill did pass just after midnight last night. The Senate voted 21-10 and it now goes to the House for consideration.
[01:01:55.120 --> 01:02:12.120]  An information technology staffer for former chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Democrat from Florida, Imran Awan, a 37-year-old, was arrested on Monday by FBI agents in U.S. Capitol Police at Dolly's International Airport while attempting to flee to Lahore, Pakistan.
[01:02:12.120 --> 01:02:32.120]  He was charged with big fraud in the U.S. District Court on Tuesday where he pleaded not guilty. According to federal court documents, officials are accusing Awan and his wife, Kina Avi, of defrauding the Congressional Federal Credit Union of $165,000 by lying on a home equity loan application and not listing the home that they were getting the loan for as a rental property.
[01:02:32.120 --> 01:02:51.120]  Awan was released and is under a high-intensity supervision program with his hearing scheduled for the 21st of August. Awan's lawyer, Christopher Cohen, said that the charges are politically motivated and, quote, began as part of a frenzy of anti-Muslim bigotry in the literal heart of our democracy, the House of Representatives.
[01:02:51.120 --> 01:03:17.120]  This is real story with your loadout for July 26, 2017.
[01:03:17.120 --> 01:03:33.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton moved on radio and we're talking about mortgage scams. What they would do is they would create all these mortgages. Now, when we went off, I was talking about Washington Mutual.
[01:03:33.120 --> 01:03:45.120]  Washington Mutual would come to you and say that we're a major national bank and we will lend you some money to purchase this house with.
[01:03:45.120 --> 01:04:04.120]  And they gave the impression that they would go to the Fed window and draw from their fractional reserve account where if they have a mortgage for $100,000, they only have to have $10,000 in the account and the Fed would give them $100,000.
[01:04:04.120 --> 01:04:20.120]  With the caveat that when the mortgage is paid back, that $100,000 was paid back into that fractional reserve account. So what they did was increase the velocity of money without increasing the volume of money.
[01:04:20.120 --> 01:04:29.120]  They created money from the thin air and when it was paid back, it went back to the thin air from which it came. That was the intent.
[01:04:29.120 --> 01:04:40.120]  But that's not what Washington Mutual was doing. Washington Mutual was actually getting the funds from a special purpose vehicle.
[01:04:40.120 --> 01:04:49.120]  And what the special purpose vehicle was was a money laundering operation for the Mexican and Colombian drug cartels.
[01:04:49.120 --> 01:05:02.120]  This real estate debacle that occurred nearly part of this century, the biggest money laundering scam in the history of the world.
[01:05:02.120 --> 01:05:21.120]  That's why Washington Mutual was shut down. That's why Wacovia was shut down. They caught Wacovia with $385 million in cash and a C-130 Herc on the runway that they were laundering for the Mexican and Colombian drug cartels.
[01:05:21.120 --> 01:05:34.120]  So what they would do is that it wasn't enough that they were laundering all this money. They set up this scam so they could avoid income tax on the money.
[01:05:34.120 --> 01:05:40.120]  They would run this mortgage company for a while and then bankrupt it out and start another one.
[01:05:40.120 --> 01:05:48.120]  Well, that may have worked for them pretty well for income tax, but it also works in your favor.
[01:05:48.120 --> 01:05:56.120]  So the first thing I want to look at is who was the lender and when did that lender go out of business?
[01:05:56.120 --> 01:06:04.120]  And were there any assignments of the mortgage to a third party?
[01:06:04.120 --> 01:06:08.120]  And if there were, when did those assignments occur?
[01:06:08.120 --> 01:06:18.120]  Primarily, I want to see the first assignment. Did it occur after a mortgage company went out of business?
[01:06:18.120 --> 01:06:20.120]  About 80% of the time, that's what I find.
[01:06:20.120 --> 01:06:29.120]  So the mortgage company goes out of business and the mortgage company supposedly holds this deed of trust as an asset.
[01:06:29.120 --> 01:06:35.120]  They own this claim. Then you go out of business.
[01:06:35.120 --> 01:06:47.120]  Well, if you have a claim that you own and you die before you transfer that claim to someone else, the claim dies with you.
[01:06:47.120 --> 01:06:58.120]  So what they did was they got merged to come in and say, oh, oh, well, I am the agent for all these people.
[01:06:58.120 --> 01:07:06.120]  And I'm going to act in this company's name and transfer this asset to this third party.
[01:07:06.120 --> 01:07:20.120]  And I said, hold on here. How did this holder of the asset authorize you to transfer their asset to a third party when they're dead?
[01:07:20.120 --> 01:07:31.120]  And Judge Shrek in New York called them vampire lenders because they would rise up from the grave and order mares to give away their properties.
[01:07:31.120 --> 01:07:41.120]  Now, that's the first thing I want to see. I want to see when the assignments occurred. Have you looked at those?
[01:07:41.120 --> 01:07:48.120]  I have. And they have transferred quite a few times.
[01:07:48.120 --> 01:07:56.120]  The first transfer. Who was the original lender for the refinance?
[01:07:56.120 --> 01:08:00.120]  First Tennessee Horizon.
[01:08:00.120 --> 01:08:07.120]  Is First Tennessee Horizon still in business?
[01:08:07.120 --> 01:08:16.120]  I don't know. They branch out from First Tennessee. First Tennessee still in business, but I don't know if First Tennessee Horizon is.
[01:08:16.120 --> 01:08:30.120]  Okay. First Tennessee Horizon may be a wholly owned subsidiary of First Tennessee, but it is not First Tennessee. It's a different company.
[01:08:30.120 --> 01:08:39.120]  So be careful with that. We have city mortgage. We have Citibank and we have Citimorgage.
[01:08:39.120 --> 01:08:49.120]  We have a number of companies this way where the bank was the owner and it was a wholly owned subsidiary.
[01:08:49.120 --> 01:08:55.120]  But we also have case law saying they are not the same company.
[01:08:55.120 --> 01:09:04.120]  So look at that first. Did First Tennessee Horizon go out of business?
[01:09:04.120 --> 01:09:14.120]  Sounds like one of those BS names they make up. So they can put that one out and then do First Tennessee Sunset or something.
[01:09:14.120 --> 01:09:23.120]  And then bankrupt that one out. So check that first. See if that original holder went out of business before they did the first assignment.
[01:09:23.120 --> 01:09:31.120]  And then look at each assignment. Who assigned what to who?
[01:09:31.120 --> 01:09:46.120]  Okay. And then go back and look at it and say, did the person who made the assignment have something in the record that specifically granted them a claim against the property?
[01:09:46.120 --> 01:09:54.120]  Every state has a statute similar to 13.001 Texas property code.
[01:09:54.120 --> 01:10:06.120]  Every state has it because without it, there's no reason to have a counter recorder. And what this one says is any claim against real property,
[01:10:06.120 --> 01:10:14.120]  not properly acknowledged or proven and filed in the public record is void as to the holder.
[01:10:14.120 --> 01:10:26.120]  So we get a lot of people talking about securitization and who holds the note. All I care about, I don't care who holds the note.
[01:10:26.120 --> 01:10:49.120]  I care about what the public record says because if you are the true and bona fide holder, but you can't track that holder status from the public record, then you can use that claim you have for toilet paper.
[01:10:49.120 --> 01:10:59.120]  They want you to go look, go after MERS. They want you to go after securitization. What they don't want you to do is look in that public record.
[01:10:59.120 --> 01:11:09.120]  So that's the first thing to get all those documents. You will lay them out. And Mark, who did what when? Okay. Once you've got that done.
[01:11:09.120 --> 01:11:25.120]  I do have to watch the man stand. Yeah, I do have. And then the other people in the public record were these and the new person that jumped on was real, a nation, LFC citizen.
[01:11:25.120 --> 01:11:32.120]  Okay. Do you have them in electronic format where you can email them to me?
[01:11:32.120 --> 01:11:44.120]  I have to scan them in and be an email them for you. Okay. Do you have a smartphone? Yeah, I do. Yeah, I can do that. I can do that.
[01:11:44.120 --> 01:11:57.120]  You can go online and get a scanner app. The scanner apps are better than photos because the scanner will actually read the document and gives a real good copy of the document.
[01:11:57.120 --> 01:12:08.120]  You can just photograph it. But instead of taking a photo, it scans the document. And you can download those for free. There's some really nice ones out there.
[01:12:08.120 --> 01:12:21.120]  And then send those to me. Now, do you have all of the closing documents from this refinance in 2001?
[01:12:21.120 --> 01:12:39.120]  Yeah. In my storage, I had to put my stuff in storage. I do have that document right there, but I was telling you that First Horizon only held it one year then they sold it to American General.
[01:12:39.120 --> 01:12:52.120]  American General then sold it to Spring Leap. And so again, I don't know who Spring Leap sold it to, but now it's talked about nation-style.
[01:12:52.120 --> 01:13:00.120]  Okay. Okay. Hold on. You're saying that this one company sold it to another, and that's what they want you to think.
[01:13:00.120 --> 01:13:10.120]  But what's really going on here is they're not selling the mortgage. They're selling the servicing rights.
[01:13:10.120 --> 01:13:17.120]  What you see filed in the record is not the holder, but the servicer.
[01:13:17.120 --> 01:13:18.120]  Why?
[01:13:18.120 --> 01:13:33.120]  These companies would create these mortgages, sell the mortgages to one company, sell the servicing rights to another company. So the servicer is actually the agent for the holder, but they are not the holder.
[01:13:33.120 --> 01:13:37.120]  That's something we get to down the line.
[01:13:37.120 --> 01:13:54.120]  Before we get to that, because of the numbers in your mortgage, I would like to see a truth-in-lending statement, a good faith estimate, a hard-won settlement statement, and a note.
[01:13:54.120 --> 01:14:11.120]  You give me those documents and I'll plug the numbers into a rather large spreadsheet I've got, and it will spit me out some numbers, and I suspect I'm going to find a rather large fraud claim we can make.
[01:14:11.120 --> 01:14:13.120]  Okay. Okay.
[01:14:13.120 --> 01:14:25.120]  So find those. I go through these numbers, especially the truth-in-lending statement. I've never had anybody who could tell me how they get those numbers.
[01:14:25.120 --> 01:14:32.120]  I've had people give me all kind of different stories, but nobody really knew. I think they just make them up.
[01:14:32.120 --> 01:14:48.120]  The best closest I could find was they take the mortgage insurance, subtract it from the principal, so that you get a principal on the truth-in-lending statement.
[01:14:48.120 --> 01:14:54.120]  The principal on the truth-in-lending statement is never or almost never the principal on your mortgage.
[01:14:54.120 --> 01:15:15.120]  It's always different. It's generally less. But the interest is higher. So they subtract the private mortgage insurance from the mortgage cost, then they increase the interest rate to pay back that private mortgage insurance.
[01:15:15.120 --> 01:15:25.120]  I don't know if that's true, but that's the closest story I could get that made the numbers come closest together, but the numbers never match.
[01:15:25.120 --> 01:15:35.120]  And about 60% of the time, you wind up paying more than you agreed to when you signed the note.
[01:15:35.120 --> 01:15:50.120]  The other 25% of the time, you pay less, and either one of those is fraud. There are other anomalies, but about a half a percent of the time, the numbers match.
[01:15:50.120 --> 01:15:58.120]  So it's clear they can match, because everyone's had a great, great while they do, but I can guarantee yours is not going to.
[01:15:58.120 --> 01:16:06.120]  So get me those numbers. I'll crunch the numbers and then let you know what I think you can do.
[01:16:06.120 --> 01:16:12.120]  How long has it been since you were evicted from the property?
[01:16:12.120 --> 01:16:15.120]  Two weeks now.
[01:16:15.120 --> 01:16:21.120]  Two weeks? Oh, wonderful. Okay, we got time. You're not too far down the road.
[01:16:21.120 --> 01:16:31.120]  Now you want to, did the bank buy the property back?
[01:16:31.120 --> 01:16:37.120]  Did the bank buy the property back or did a third party purchase?
[01:16:37.120 --> 01:16:53.120]  They actually really never sold the property because Shapiro and Engle were sending me and I sent them back to do a debt validation and then a request for admission.
[01:16:53.120 --> 01:16:59.120]  And they really, they kept, what they kept going is putting out the sale, putting out the sale.
[01:16:59.120 --> 01:17:07.120]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:17:07.120 --> 01:17:13.120]  I need my truth fix. I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:17:13.120 --> 01:17:20.120]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:17:20.120 --> 01:17:22.120]  How can I help logos?
[01:17:22.120 --> 01:17:29.120]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:29.120 --> 01:17:34.120]  First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:17:34.120 --> 01:17:43.120]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.120 --> 01:17:44.120]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.120 --> 01:17:45.120]  No.
[01:17:45.120 --> 01:17:47.120]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.120 --> 01:17:48.120]  No.
[01:17:48.120 --> 01:17:49.120]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:17:49.120 --> 01:17:50.120]  No.
[01:17:50.120 --> 01:17:51.120]  I mean yes.
[01:17:51.120 --> 01:17:56.120]  Well, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:17:56.120 --> 01:17:58.120]  We are welcome.
[01:17:58.120 --> 01:18:00.120]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:00.120 --> 01:18:09.120]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:18:09.120 --> 01:18:14.120]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:18:14.120 --> 01:18:24.120]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers and journalists.
[01:18:24.120 --> 01:18:27.120]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:18:27.120 --> 01:18:32.120]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[01:18:32.120 --> 01:18:39.120]  We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:18:39.120 --> 01:18:46.120]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept big coins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6400.
[01:18:46.120 --> 01:18:51.120]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:18:51.120 --> 01:18:54.120]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[01:18:54.120 --> 01:19:00.120]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6400.
[01:19:00.120 --> 01:19:10.120]  This is the Logos Radio Net Video.
[01:19:31.120 --> 01:19:36.120]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:36.120 --> 01:19:40.120]  We're at the Kelton River Radio and I ran off the cliff there.
[01:19:40.120 --> 01:19:45.120]  Okay, go ahead. I'll get you unmuted.
[01:19:45.120 --> 01:19:55.120]  Before you went to break, I was telling you I sent them out quite a few things and they always sent me back words.
[01:19:55.120 --> 01:20:05.120]  They, like, put off the sale and then the last thing that they did was send substitution of trustees.
[01:20:05.120 --> 01:20:14.120]  That was in March. They never notified me of a sale because I never heard from them after that last document I sent to them.
[01:20:14.120 --> 01:20:20.120]  They never notified me of a sale anything. You would just notice a substitution of trustees.
[01:20:20.120 --> 01:20:30.120]  So they supposedly sold it in April and never notified me of a sale to this company named Reanation LLC.
[01:20:30.120 --> 01:20:40.120]  And that's where the Fongie documents come in, where they come out with a blank document with no goods, signatures,
[01:20:40.120 --> 01:20:44.120]  and they got, like, five different stamps on the page.
[01:20:44.120 --> 01:20:52.120]  On one page with nothing on it, it's just blank at the bottom, and the person they're serving is occupant.
[01:20:52.120 --> 01:21:00.120]  And so then when I go down and pick up the record, now, the judge has stamped on it.
[01:21:00.120 --> 01:21:08.120]  She's stamped off on it in safe position, but she has several different stamps on here.
[01:21:08.120 --> 01:21:14.120]  One in April, one in May, one in June, and different times.
[01:21:14.120 --> 01:21:22.120]  Then they have the official process server that supposedly had posted the affidavit,
[01:21:22.120 --> 01:21:26.120]  and then he deposed himself and said he never posted the affidavit.
[01:21:26.120 --> 01:21:33.120]  One say he posted one, the other one say he doesn't. He didn't post anything and never serve anybody.
[01:21:33.120 --> 01:21:44.120]  Okay. Okay. This is complex, but it sounds like you got a great case to go after them with.
[01:21:44.120 --> 01:21:49.120]  But I need to see the documentation so I can do an evaluation.
[01:21:49.120 --> 01:21:51.120]  I would definitely get those for you.
[01:21:51.120 --> 01:22:00.120]  If you send them to Randy at rulelawradio.com, I'll have a look at them and I'll get in touch with you.
[01:22:00.120 --> 01:22:05.120]  There's nothing like giving them a good fight. They've already evicted you from the property.
[01:22:05.120 --> 01:22:14.120]  The fact that they gave you an $88,000 mortgage on the $70,000 property is fraught on its face.
[01:22:14.120 --> 01:22:16.120]  What?
[01:22:16.120 --> 01:22:21.120]  So that'll give us something good to work with.
[01:22:21.120 --> 01:22:26.120]  But it's only been two weeks. We may get you back in the property.
[01:22:26.120 --> 01:22:35.120]  So give me those documents and I'll have a look at them and then I'll let you know what I think you can do.
[01:22:35.120 --> 01:22:38.120]  Okay, Randy. I still appreciate that.
[01:22:38.120 --> 01:22:49.120]  Alrighty. Thank you very much and we'll be in touch. Now we're going to go to Frank in California. Hello, Frank.
[01:22:49.120 --> 01:22:56.120]  What do you have for us today?
[01:22:56.120 --> 01:23:01.120]  It looks like Frank may not be there.
[01:23:01.120 --> 01:23:06.120]  Well, I will try him back in a little bit.
[01:23:06.120 --> 01:23:21.120]  Okay, in talking to Jermaine about what the note in Tennessee, there is so much you could do.
[01:23:21.120 --> 01:23:30.120]  One of the problems the banks have, the banks for the most part have bought and paid for the judges.
[01:23:30.120 --> 01:23:42.120]  If you file an action and a foreclosure issue, you can pretty well expect the court to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[01:23:42.120 --> 01:23:45.120]  This has been a problem.
[01:23:45.120 --> 01:24:03.120]  We had Janet Palinon who indicated that some two-thirds of the judges are using fraudulent mortgages to launder the money they're getting from the banks to rule against all of us.
[01:24:03.120 --> 01:24:10.120]  She's in Mexico and hiding because the judges want to get after her for telling on them.
[01:24:10.120 --> 01:24:16.120]  Okay, well, worked up after having Janet on the show.
[01:24:16.120 --> 01:24:30.120]  I started looking at how can we use this and I've just put together a request for financials of the judge.
[01:24:30.120 --> 01:24:49.120]  Under the Merrill v. U.S. crop insurance case, U.S. crop insurance back in the 40s during the war, the government provided crop insurance.
[01:24:49.120 --> 01:25:01.120]  And this guy grew summer wheat, then he grew winter wheat and bought crop insurance for the winter wheat, got a drought, winter wheat failed, he went to collect on the insurance.
[01:25:01.120 --> 01:25:07.120]  And the government told him we can't pay on that because you can't insure winter wheat after summer wheat.
[01:25:07.120 --> 01:25:11.120]  He said, but your representative told me I couldn't, he took my money.
[01:25:11.120 --> 01:25:19.120]  He said, well, the law does not allow, the court said the law does not allow us to do this.
[01:25:19.120 --> 01:25:26.120]  So even if this representative misrepresented the truth to you, the law still does not allow us to do this.
[01:25:26.120 --> 01:25:34.120]  So it's your responsibility to determine the veracity of the public official that you're dealing with.
[01:25:34.120 --> 01:25:37.120]  Okay, we use that.
[01:25:37.120 --> 01:25:46.120]  Now I've put together a large financial disclosure request for the judge.
[01:25:46.120 --> 01:25:56.120]  And what I did to put it together is I used mostly California disclosure statutes because they were the most complete.
[01:25:56.120 --> 01:26:00.120]  But I didn't write these informal statutes, just in the form of discovery.
[01:26:00.120 --> 01:26:13.120]  And once I went through all of what California calls for, then I started looking for different methods of laundering money.
[01:26:13.120 --> 01:26:24.120]  And looked for the kinds of questions I could ask that go to these different methods for laundering money.
[01:26:24.120 --> 01:26:30.120]  And we send this to the judge, and here's the judge's problem.
[01:26:30.120 --> 01:26:37.120]  If he's dirty, then he can prove he were letting him know we're coming after you.
[01:26:37.120 --> 01:26:43.120]  And we're going to find out how you're dirty, and we're going to use it against you.
[01:26:43.120 --> 01:26:52.120]  And what according to Jeanette Phelan, every time she brought these issues up, the judge recused himself from the case immediately.
[01:26:52.120 --> 01:26:54.120]  He hit the road.
[01:26:54.120 --> 01:26:59.120]  Okay, if the judge is not dirty, then you make this request.
[01:26:59.120 --> 01:27:03.120]  For the most part, they're not going to answer this request, and we don't care.
[01:27:03.120 --> 01:27:07.120]  This is about politics.
[01:27:07.120 --> 01:27:14.120]  If the judge is dirty, you give him notice that you're looking behind the curtain, you're looking for any flaw in his armor.
[01:27:14.120 --> 01:27:18.120]  You're looking for a shot to take him out of office.
[01:27:18.120 --> 01:27:29.120]  If he's not dirty, what you've done is dirty the waters for him, because perception is everything.
[01:27:29.120 --> 01:27:32.120]  He doesn't have to be on the take.
[01:27:32.120 --> 01:27:40.120]  He only need to make it look like he's on the take, and that'll damage his career.
[01:27:40.120 --> 01:27:44.120]  Higher level judges understand the politics.
[01:27:44.120 --> 01:27:54.120]  Low level judges, they get hired by municipalities and local governments, and they're just employees.
[01:27:54.120 --> 01:28:09.120]  But as you move up the electoral process, the higher up you get in any one position, the more people you've got below you that wants your job.
[01:28:09.120 --> 01:28:15.120]  So you become very sensitive to public opinion.
[01:28:15.120 --> 01:28:21.120]  And when we request this judge's financials, people look at that and say,
[01:28:21.120 --> 01:28:28.120]  why would they request his financials unless they had reason to believe he was on the take?
[01:28:28.120 --> 01:28:32.120]  So it harms the judge even if he wasn't on the take.
[01:28:32.120 --> 01:28:39.120]  And what we want to tell the judge is, I don't care if you're upset with me.
[01:28:39.120 --> 01:28:44.120]  I'm not in here dangling by my bar card like that lawyer over there is.
[01:28:44.120 --> 01:28:48.120]  I can kick your behind, and I don't care if you like it or not.
[01:28:48.120 --> 01:28:53.120]  So if you want to render bogus rules, you knock yourself out, but I'm going to work you over for it.
[01:28:53.120 --> 01:29:02.120]  And I'm going to create all this negative publicity that will make it harder for you to advance like most of these district judges.
[01:29:02.120 --> 01:29:05.120]  They want to be appointed to the appellate court bench.
[01:29:05.120 --> 01:29:16.120]  But when they've got this shadow of corruption hanging over them, they become a political liability and their history.
[01:29:16.120 --> 01:29:25.120]  So we put together this document. If anybody wants a copy of it, just send me an email and ask for it and I'll attach it.
[01:29:25.120 --> 01:29:31.120]  Let me see if Frank is woken up. I think I put him to sleep. Frank, are you there?
[01:29:31.120 --> 01:29:34.120]  Yeah, hi, Brandy. How are you?
[01:29:34.120 --> 01:29:41.120]  There we go. I couldn't get you. I couldn't raise you the last time I tried. Okay, we're...
[01:29:41.120 --> 01:29:47.120]  Okay, hang on. We're about to go to break. We've got about 15 seconds. We'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:29:47.120 --> 01:29:51.120]  Brandy Kelton, move our radio. We'll be right back.
[01:29:51.120 --> 01:30:10.120]  Social network sites can be a privacy nightmare, but a new study says other websites may be leaking sensitive personal information about you, too.
[01:30:10.120 --> 01:30:15.120]  And the problem is getting worse. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you more in just a moment.
[01:30:15.120 --> 01:30:21.120]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.120 --> 01:30:26.120]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:26.120 --> 01:30:31.120]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.120 --> 01:30:34.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.120 --> 01:30:41.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.120 --> 01:30:45.120]  Then start over with StartPage.
[01:31:11.120 --> 01:31:17.120]  And who might wind up with it? The study concludes that internet privacy is a big problem and it's getting worse.
[01:31:17.120 --> 01:31:22.120]  Just one more reason to stick with privacy-friendly websites like StartPage.com.
[01:31:22.120 --> 01:31:48.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:48.120 --> 01:31:53.120]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.120 --> 01:31:57.120]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.120 --> 01:32:19.120]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:28.120 --> 01:32:38.120]  To handle your claim and your roof right the first time, just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.120 --> 01:32:45.120]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.120 --> 01:32:50.120]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:50.120 --> 01:32:58.120]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.120 --> 01:33:01.120]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.120 --> 01:33:21.120]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:31.120 --> 01:33:37.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Logos Radio and we're talking to Frank in California.
[01:33:37.120 --> 01:33:40.120]  Okay, Frank, what do you have for us today?
[01:33:40.120 --> 01:33:44.120]  Okay, Randy. It's about the ranking for closure.
[01:33:44.120 --> 01:34:05.120]  I got the U.S. warrants on the attorneys and judges and there is a state court action where the judge has rolled the, you know, was declared a vectatious litigant.
[01:34:05.120 --> 01:34:26.120]  And the judge, I was represented by an attorney that I let go, but the judge has come forward and said, you know, I have to show cause why I should not be expected to place a bond to go forward with the lawsuit.
[01:34:26.120 --> 01:34:39.120]  And that I actually, in a ex parte, I provided the arrest warrant against the judges as well as the attorneys to the judge.
[01:34:39.120 --> 01:34:53.120]  So I am actually giving her notice that these people must be arrested, yet alone represent the identity that, you know, has closed over 10 years ago.
[01:34:53.120 --> 01:35:11.120]  In a trustee sale, they actually transferred the deed of trust to a closed entity that closed more than 10 years ago because of all the notices that I had filed on Zelo.
[01:35:11.120 --> 01:35:32.120]  And what happened is that there are multiple issues. What happened is that they had originally announced that the foreclosure sale to be an example on July the 10th, and then they confirmed it at the trustee sale that is postponed to July the
[01:35:32.120 --> 01:35:49.120]  10th, for example, 30th. And then right after everybody was gone, the auctioneer conducted the private sale and transferred the deed of trust to a closed entity that closed more than 10 years ago.
[01:35:49.120 --> 01:35:51.120]  Interesting.
[01:35:51.120 --> 01:36:05.120]  Yeah, it is. I mean, it's layer over layer of fraud. So the attorneys that I had because I became handicapped as a result of all this stress.
[01:36:05.120 --> 01:36:27.120]  And I had doctors left her. I, in one of my cases, I asked the federal judge, appellate judge in bankruptcy to give me leave to file my papers. So she gave me that she granted the filing of my papers by almost four months.
[01:36:27.120 --> 01:36:49.120]  So my, you know, my, my papers, I do almost beginning of October. And I'm using that as it is to the color that, you know, the attorney could not, my attorney could not have filed for an action to be relieved from being an attorney while I was on sick leave.
[01:36:49.120 --> 01:37:02.120]  So, you know, there's like layers over layers of absence of jurisdiction, absence of jurisdiction of the judge to go forward. Then I'm on sick leave and forcing me to appear in court. I actually went to the court.
[01:37:02.120 --> 01:37:21.120]  And I said to the judge, just in the case of the judge, judge, I can't hear out of respect for the court, but I have so much pain in my back and neck and arms that I have to leave. So I left it with the court services and I hope that they have delivered that to her.
[01:37:21.120 --> 01:37:24.120]  So that's where we are.
[01:37:24.120 --> 01:37:35.120]  Okay. Did you hear me speaking just a short time ago about these requests for financial disclosures from the judge?
[01:37:35.120 --> 01:37:39.120]  No, I did not hear that.
[01:37:39.120 --> 01:38:01.120]  Okay. I put one together and I put it together for California. I have some people out there I'm working with and they're in a probate issue and the probate judges in San Diego County are absolutely known for being totally corrupt.
[01:38:01.120 --> 01:38:13.120]  So, we put together a financial disclosure request. If you'll send me an email, I'll send you a copy of this.
[01:38:13.120 --> 01:38:31.120]  Right. So, thank you for bringing that up. We know that the judges are being paid by the county and I have those amounts anywhere from a few hundred thousand dollars all the way up to several millions of dollars.
[01:38:31.120 --> 01:38:43.120]  And a pair of surgeons, those payments are illegal and they must after 2008 if they were over the limit have to buy law return it, but none of them have been returning it.
[01:38:43.120 --> 01:38:55.120]  And so the burden is on the DA, the court employees, the judges to enforce it, but, you know, who's put their feet to the fire to follow the law.
[01:38:55.120 --> 01:39:04.120]  But also this information is also available, I think, from judicial watch to a large extent, but I think you're right.
[01:39:04.120 --> 01:39:24.120]  I have asked for a request for judicial disclosure of financial conflict of interest and several times they have omitted admitting because through other sources I was able to find out that they're not disclosing everything.
[01:39:24.120 --> 01:39:32.120]  But yeah, I may have your email address, I'll make sure to send you an email.
[01:39:32.120 --> 01:39:35.120]  Wait, I couldn't understand that last part.
[01:39:35.120 --> 01:39:38.120]  Yes, can I have your email, Randy?
[01:39:38.120 --> 01:40:06.120]  It's randy at ruleoflawradio.com. The point of this kind of request, what I did was I went through the California disqualification rules and pulled out all of those financial issues that would disqualify a judge and asked for the judge for information concerning these issues.
[01:40:06.120 --> 01:40:15.120]  I asked for information about him, about his immediate family, his wife, his children.
[01:40:15.120 --> 01:40:28.120]  I also asked about his anyone within three degrees of cosanguinity, aunts, uncles, cousins, I want everything.
[01:40:28.120 --> 01:40:32.120]  Well, they're not going to give it to us.
[01:40:32.120 --> 01:40:34.120]  We don't care.
[01:40:34.120 --> 01:40:47.120]  Then, once I got all of that done, then I went on the internet and started looking up all of the different ways that judges have been prosecuted for laundering money.
[01:40:47.120 --> 01:40:57.120]  And one of the primary ways that Janet Fallon, she came on our show and talked about was that the judge would get a mortgage on his property.
[01:40:57.120 --> 01:41:04.120]  And then six months later, it's paid off. And they get another mortgage. And six months later, that's paid off.
[01:41:04.120 --> 01:41:07.120]  So who's paying off these mortgages?
[01:41:07.120 --> 01:41:16.120]  What's happening is the judge takes the equity out of his property. So that's clean money that somebody else pays off the mortgage.
[01:41:16.120 --> 01:41:36.120]  So you want to go to the public, to the county recorder's office and find all of the properties that is in the judge's name or is in the name of any company or law firm with which the judge is or has been associated.
[01:41:36.120 --> 01:41:51.120]  When the judge finds out that you're digging into his or her financial history this way, and she will find out because the clerks are telling her really, really quick.
[01:41:51.120 --> 01:42:01.120]  Then, if she's clean, you will create the perception of corruption.
[01:42:01.120 --> 01:42:09.120]  If she's not clean, she's going to be afraid that you're going to find what she's trying to hide.
[01:42:09.120 --> 01:42:16.120]  And what Janet was saying, what the judges generally do, if they're dirty, is they recuse themselves immediately.
[01:42:16.120 --> 01:42:19.120]  They hit the road. That'll tell you if the judge is corrupt.
[01:42:19.120 --> 01:42:33.120]  But then you get another judge, and this judge comes in with fair warning that you're going to scour his or her finances to find out if they've been on the take.
[01:42:33.120 --> 01:42:36.120]  And if they have, they're not going to want to be there.
[01:42:36.120 --> 01:42:46.120]  Even if they haven't, you're going to create the perception that they have, and perception is everything.
[01:42:46.120 --> 01:42:57.120]  So, you'll make it harder for the judge to render a bogus ruling against you because it's going to look like blatant corruption.
[01:42:57.120 --> 01:43:02.120]  Right. So, thank you for sharing that.
[01:43:02.120 --> 01:43:14.120]  On the US District Court Judge, we found out that there is a judge whose husband is the California Supreme Court Justice.
[01:43:14.120 --> 01:43:21.120]  These two have rented a house that is owned by the Stafford.
[01:43:21.120 --> 01:43:29.120]  And they got over $1.7 million of loan on a lease property.
[01:43:29.120 --> 01:43:31.120]  And we have that evidence.
[01:43:31.120 --> 01:43:35.120]  And we provided that to that attorney general and a whole bunch of other people.
[01:43:35.120 --> 01:43:38.120]  We also provided that to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
[01:43:38.120 --> 01:43:42.120]  The Chief Judge came back and said, this is a privilege.
[01:43:42.120 --> 01:43:45.120]  We did the same analysis on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.
[01:43:45.120 --> 01:43:54.120]  And we found out that he has actually multiple real estate development companies.
[01:43:54.120 --> 01:44:13.120]  I mean, how can the Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, who is supposed to live like...
[01:44:25.120 --> 01:44:27.120]  And marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.120 --> 01:44:30.120]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.120 --> 01:44:33.120]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts.
[01:44:33.120 --> 01:44:39.120]  And to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.120 --> 01:44:48.120]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.120 --> 01:45:00.120]  Call 888-910-4367 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempUSA.org.
[01:45:19.120 --> 01:45:22.120]  First place, up for grabs of Spike's Tactical AR-15.
[01:45:22.120 --> 01:45:28.120]  Second place, Taurus PT-111 G2 9mm Pistol from Defense Distributed.
[01:45:28.120 --> 01:45:31.120]  Third place, the AR-308 80% lower.
[01:45:31.120 --> 01:45:34.120]  Fourth place, the AR-15 80% lower.
[01:45:34.120 --> 01:45:38.120]  From Fat Sals Deli, fifth place, $100 gift card for Fat Sals Deli.
[01:45:38.120 --> 01:45:41.120]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:45:41.120 --> 01:45:43.120]  That's LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:45:43.120 --> 01:45:48.120]  Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal101, you get 4 chances to win.
[01:45:48.120 --> 01:45:52.120]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:45:52.120 --> 01:45:55.120]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:45:55.120 --> 01:46:14.120]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:46:14.120 --> 01:46:26.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, we are talking to Frank in California.
[01:46:26.120 --> 01:46:35.120]  Now, have you created a report and forwarded it to a California grand jury?
[01:46:35.120 --> 01:46:51.120]  I actually sent it to the U.S. Attorney and then she didn't do or he didn't do anything.
[01:46:51.120 --> 01:47:02.120]  Then I sent it to the grand jury and indicated that it appears that the U.S. Attorney is pondering the jury.
[01:47:02.120 --> 01:47:09.120]  Actually, I did this multiple times and then when nothing I heard back, I sent it to the Attorney General
[01:47:09.120 --> 01:47:16.120]  and said that this woman or this guy is pondering the jury, I'll send this to them.
[01:47:16.120 --> 01:47:19.120]  So, it's under review at the Attorney General.
[01:47:19.120 --> 01:47:24.120]  But so far, I have sent in excess of 16 of these to the Attorney General.
[01:47:24.120 --> 01:47:30.120]  So far, two or three have come back and said that this is a serious action.
[01:47:30.120 --> 01:47:38.120]  So, on one of them, I actually sent a notice to the two ladies that send me these letters stating you're fired.
[01:47:38.120 --> 01:47:47.120]  You obviously are impeding justice and you're trying to cover up the criminal act perfected.
[01:47:47.120 --> 01:47:56.120]  When I said grand jury, I was actually thinking about a state grand jury because you're in California
[01:47:56.120 --> 01:48:03.120]  and California has the best grand jury system of any state that I've looked at.
[01:48:03.120 --> 01:48:08.120]  They can investigate into anything they want to.
[01:48:08.120 --> 01:48:15.120]  State grand jury several years back, almost six years ago, when I found out about the forged instruments,
[01:48:15.120 --> 01:48:23.120]  Robo-signing and Robonautorizing and filing those in the counter recorder, I went there and they said that
[01:48:23.120 --> 01:48:26.120]  this is a civil action. And I said, what are you talking about?
[01:48:26.120 --> 01:48:29.120]  If I were to do this, I would be arrested on the spot.
[01:48:29.120 --> 01:48:34.120]  This is securities fraud, 20 years in prison per count.
[01:48:34.120 --> 01:48:36.120]  And they're like multiple counts here.
[01:48:36.120 --> 01:48:45.120]  They said, no, you have to go to the district attorney for him to bring forward a charge.
[01:48:45.120 --> 01:48:49.120]  And I actually sat with four men and one of the ladies there.
[01:48:49.120 --> 01:48:54.120]  And I asked them, I mean, I said, it appears to me that you're under the control of this court.
[01:48:54.120 --> 01:48:57.120]  You're not working in dependency.
[01:48:57.120 --> 01:49:00.120]  So that was that, but maybe things have changed.
[01:49:00.120 --> 01:49:11.120]  Okay. The trick is, how many grand juries are there in California?
[01:49:11.120 --> 01:49:14.120]  I don't have a...
[01:49:14.120 --> 01:49:19.120]  Okay. Hold on. Here's why I asked that question.
[01:49:19.120 --> 01:49:29.120]  I researched this in Texas and I'm going to be, I'm relatively certain it's going to be the same in California.
[01:49:29.120 --> 01:49:36.120]  In Texas, there is a grand jury for every county.
[01:49:36.120 --> 01:49:46.120]  And in Texas, we have all these district judges and each judge has its own district.
[01:49:46.120 --> 01:49:52.120]  And it is a district judge that impanels a grand jury.
[01:49:52.120 --> 01:50:05.120]  So what the consideration is, is that a grand jury only has jurisdiction over the county he's in.
[01:50:05.120 --> 01:50:15.120]  However, there is law that limits the venue of a district judge to his district.
[01:50:15.120 --> 01:50:23.120]  There is no law that limits the venue of a grand jury to a county.
[01:50:23.120 --> 01:50:38.120]  While each county has a grand jury, they are state grand juries and there's nothing in law anywhere that eliminates their venue to any one particular spot in the state.
[01:50:38.120 --> 01:50:46.120]  For this, Texas, I got 254 counties.
[01:50:46.120 --> 01:50:53.120]  In some counties, Houston, I think they have seven or eight grand juries.
[01:50:53.120 --> 01:50:56.120]  Dallas has five.
[01:50:56.120 --> 01:50:59.120]  Tarrant County, Fort Worth has three.
[01:50:59.120 --> 01:51:01.120]  Austin has three.
[01:51:01.120 --> 01:51:04.120]  So there's more than 254 grand juries.
[01:51:04.120 --> 01:51:20.120]  What's to prevent me from sending a presentment to every single grand jury and if a prosecuting attorney interferes with it in any way, then I start filing charges against the prosecuting attorney for witness for jury tampering.
[01:51:20.120 --> 01:51:28.120]  Now, granted, you're not likely to get the prosecutor prosecuted.
[01:51:28.120 --> 01:51:36.120]  But with all these grand juries, what's the chance that one will pick it up?
[01:51:36.120 --> 01:51:46.120]  What's the chance that you have a grand jury with a member on it who's just been screwed over by one of these judges?
[01:51:46.120 --> 01:51:48.120]  It's like playing Russian roulette.
[01:51:48.120 --> 01:51:50.120]  It's all politics.
[01:51:50.120 --> 01:51:53.120]  We got to figure out a way to create politics.
[01:51:53.120 --> 01:51:58.120]  Where do you get a list of those state grand juries?
[01:51:58.120 --> 01:52:04.120]  I was only able to find the one from my county and I was driving the court in the state court.
[01:52:04.120 --> 01:52:07.120]  Wait, I'm having trouble understanding you.
[01:52:07.120 --> 01:52:12.120]  Yeah, where do you get a list of the state grand juries?
[01:52:12.120 --> 01:52:16.120]  You said that there may be an excess of 200 in California.
[01:52:16.120 --> 01:52:22.120]  Have you considered filing a RICO suit?
[01:52:22.120 --> 01:52:33.120]  Well, I have filed in excess of 70 court cases in state and federal court and appellate court.
[01:52:33.120 --> 01:52:35.120]  Not a single one of them I have won.
[01:52:35.120 --> 01:52:49.120]  They have conspired against me and sometimes within an hour or two, you hear four or five adverse rulings in my cases,
[01:52:49.120 --> 01:52:57.120]  which tells me that they are on a system that under no circumstances they're going to let me win.
[01:52:57.120 --> 01:53:01.120]  This is pretty much what I tell everybody.
[01:53:01.120 --> 01:53:11.120]  The courts are absolutely corrupt, so we have to find a political way to make it costly for them to prosecute,
[01:53:11.120 --> 01:53:14.120]  for them not to give you what you want.
[01:53:14.120 --> 01:53:18.120]  I take it you've been filing judicial conduct complaints and bar grievances?
[01:53:18.120 --> 01:53:21.120]  Oh, yes.
[01:53:21.120 --> 01:53:29.120]  I have filed, I've sent to Barr and I indicated to them, look, this attorney was not admitted to this court
[01:53:29.120 --> 01:53:37.120]  and he must be disbarred according to the California Business and Professional Court 6126A.
[01:53:37.120 --> 01:53:42.120]  Barr writes back to me and says, no, we checked and he is a member of that court.
[01:53:42.120 --> 01:53:44.120]  I said, are you kidding?
[01:53:44.120 --> 01:53:50.120]  Just go to the website and you'll see, as I'm writing to you, he's still not admitted.
[01:53:50.120 --> 01:54:01.120]  Then you take your grievances to the California Supreme Court, they don't do anything against these people.
[01:54:01.120 --> 01:54:06.120]  I don't know what to tell you, you're telling me that there absolutely is no law whatsoever
[01:54:06.120 --> 01:54:12.120]  and that's to make anything different from what you do, they're just going to rule against you.
[01:54:12.120 --> 01:54:20.120]  Yeah, I mean, I, I mean, you think of it, I've done it, but if you have a list of the state grand jury,
[01:54:20.120 --> 01:54:24.120]  I have no problem sending my grievances to all of them.
[01:54:24.120 --> 01:54:29.120]  I don't have a list of them, but they'd be simply enough to find.
[01:54:29.120 --> 01:54:32.120]  Okay, so these are from the state grand jury, right?
[01:54:32.120 --> 01:54:39.120]  Okay, look at the law concerning grand juries, grand juries are the wild card.
[01:54:39.120 --> 01:54:46.120]  My prosecutor, I walked in the winters to see him one day and he's sitting at his desk with his head in his hand.
[01:54:46.120 --> 01:54:48.120]  I said, Greg, what's the matter?
[01:54:48.120 --> 01:54:56.120]  And he said, those darn grand jurors, you never know what they're going to do.
[01:54:56.120 --> 01:55:00.120]  And I could not have heard anything better.
[01:55:00.120 --> 01:55:08.120]  This was the prosecutor who's supposed to have him under control and he admits he never knows what they're going to do.
[01:55:08.120 --> 01:55:13.120]  Grand juries is probably your only hope.
[01:55:13.120 --> 01:55:28.120]  That is the one thing that our founders put in place that's almost impossible for corrupt officials to completely control.
[01:55:28.120 --> 01:55:41.120]  You just never know when you're going to get somebody on a grand jury who recognizes your circumstance and has a chance to do something about it.
[01:55:41.120 --> 01:55:44.120]  Okay, so tomorrow I will focus on that.
[01:55:44.120 --> 01:55:49.120]  And read the code concerning grand jurors.
[01:55:49.120 --> 01:55:57.120]  Prosecutors do some things that are subtle, but they don't fall within code.
[01:55:57.120 --> 01:56:04.120]  I had a meeting with a law professor who was also an assistant district attorney.
[01:56:04.120 --> 01:56:08.120]  She was getting hired to teach law at one of the local colleges.
[01:56:08.120 --> 01:56:16.120]  And the prosecution in Texas, everybody says you have to give your complaint to the prosecutor and he gives you the grand jury.
[01:56:16.120 --> 01:56:20.120]  And I went to him and said, no, that's not what the code says.
[01:56:20.120 --> 01:56:24.120]  And this law professor said, oh yeah, this is how it is.
[01:56:24.120 --> 01:56:31.120]  So we got a meeting and I sat down with her and I walked her through the code and wiped the floor with her.
[01:56:31.120 --> 01:56:37.120]  When I got done, she said to the district attorney, he is white.
[01:56:37.120 --> 01:56:45.120]  He can bring a complaint to the grand jury and we cannot interfere.
[01:56:45.120 --> 01:56:54.120]  But every prosecutor in Texas will tell you you can't bring a complaint to a grand jury.
[01:56:54.120 --> 01:56:55.120]  Not true.
[01:56:55.120 --> 01:56:59.120]  Look at your code very carefully.
[01:56:59.120 --> 01:57:02.120]  Your code is really for the grand jury itself.
[01:57:02.120 --> 01:57:12.120]  Now I've had US attorneys threaten me with charging me with jury tampering if I tried to reach a grand jury.
[01:57:12.120 --> 01:57:19.120]  And I told the prosecutor, the main one, we were after an IRS agent in Fort Lauderdale.
[01:57:19.120 --> 01:57:23.120]  And I sent a complaint to the grand jury and he threatened me about it.
[01:57:23.120 --> 01:57:26.120]  And I said, okay, do you charge me with jury tampering?
[01:57:26.120 --> 01:57:28.120]  I'll charge you with obstruction.
[01:57:28.120 --> 01:57:31.120]  We'll see how this works out for you.
[01:57:31.120 --> 01:57:36.120]  The next day they fired the IRS agent.
[01:57:36.120 --> 01:57:39.120]  And it got rid of me.
[01:57:39.120 --> 01:57:42.120]  But look at the grand jury. That's going to be the weakness.
[01:57:42.120 --> 01:57:48.120]  Whether you get to them or not, if you're trying to get to every grand jury in the state,
[01:57:48.120 --> 01:57:52.120]  they're going to be afraid you're going to get to one and the grand jury is going to indict them.
[01:57:52.120 --> 01:57:56.120]  And then all of everything starts to fall apart on them.
[01:57:56.120 --> 01:57:57.120]  Okay.
[01:57:57.120 --> 01:57:59.120]  That's a good suggestion.
[01:57:59.120 --> 01:58:01.120]  Thank you for sharing that.
[01:58:01.120 --> 01:58:02.120]  Okay.
[01:58:02.120 --> 01:58:08.120]  And I'm glad you stayed with it that there's not many people who will fight as hard as you do.
[01:58:08.120 --> 01:58:13.120]  And keep after the good chance you may win in the end.
[01:58:13.120 --> 01:58:19.120]  It's always when you think there's no hope left that the war begins to turn.
[01:58:19.120 --> 01:58:21.120]  So hang in there.
[01:58:21.120 --> 01:58:22.120]  We are out of time.
[01:58:22.120 --> 01:58:25.120]  This is Randy Kelton, rule of our radio.
[01:58:25.120 --> 01:58:33.120]  We'll be back next Thursday and Friday night with our regular Thursday and Friday night shows.
[01:58:33.120 --> 01:58:39.120]  Make sure you check in Monday night for Eddie Craig with his traffic show.
[01:58:39.120 --> 01:59:08.120]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:59:09.120 --> 01:59:16.120]  We'll be back next Thursday with our regular Thursday and Friday night shows.
[01:59:39.120 --> 01:59:49.120]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.