ROL_2017-06-26_16k.timecode

[00:11.800 --> 00:17.200]  silver seventeen dollars and fifty one cents an ounce, Texas crude forty eight dollars and thirty six cents a barrel and
[00:17.720 --> 00:22.900]  Bitcoin is still going up sitting at about two thousand four hundred seventy two U.S. Currency
[00:25.080 --> 00:27.080]  Today in history the year
[00:27.080 --> 00:32.920]  1953 the coronation of Queen Elizabeth the second crowned Queen of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia
[00:33.160 --> 00:40.840]  New Zealand and her other realms and territories and head of the Commonwealth marks one of the first major international events to be televised
[00:41.240 --> 00:43.240]  today in history
[00:46.520 --> 00:49.440]  In recent news President Donald Trump announced the U.S.
[00:49.440 --> 00:54.160]  Would withdraw from the UN Paris accord on climate change this last Thursday yesterday
[00:54.160 --> 00:58.080]  Stating that quote the U.S. Will withdraw from the Paris climate accord
[00:58.080 --> 01:03.720]  But begin negotiations to re-enter either the Paris accord or a really entirely new
[01:03.920 --> 01:10.000]  Transaction on terms that are fair to the United States its businesses its workers its people its taxpayers
[01:10.160 --> 01:15.760]  This as could be predictably expected had G7 formerly G8 leaders in a frenzy
[01:16.040 --> 01:22.080]  Notably Chinese dictatorship admiring Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who in a statement said that quote
[01:22.080 --> 01:29.680]  We are deeply disappointed that the United States federal government has decided to withdraw from the Paris agreement or French socialist president Emmanuel Macron
[01:29.960 --> 01:34.520]  Saying that it's quote a mistake for our planet wherever we live whoever we are
[01:34.520 --> 01:37.800]  We all share the same responsibility to make our planet great again
[01:38.160 --> 01:44.600]  Along with UK Prime Minister Theresa May German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni
[01:44.760 --> 01:50.120]  All stating disapproval as well even Russia 8th in the former G8 stated the great significance
[01:50.120 --> 01:53.080]  It saw in the Paris agreement hours before Trump and made his announcement
[01:53.520 --> 01:59.960]  Not to mention a Vatican spokesman from the Holy See expressed the pontiff's dismay at President Trump's decision
[02:00.440 --> 02:06.320]  Unfortunately world leaders and media pundits failed to ask the opinions of another more important base the American taxpayer
[02:06.520 --> 02:13.120]  Because they were never consulted via referendum or congressional vote when President Obama decided to unilaterally sign up the u.s.
[02:13.120 --> 02:16.480]  To an agreement that would have major effects on industry in the United States
[02:16.480 --> 02:23.640]  Or maybe they should have asked major climate change proponent American adjunct professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
[02:24.040 --> 02:30.540]  At Columbia University James Hansen what he thought of the agreement which he actually called a fraud really a fake
[02:30.720 --> 02:32.720]  It's just worthless words
[02:32.760 --> 02:40.120]  Mostly because there was no solution to co2 emissions other than charging more for energy, which would only disproportionately hurt the most vulnerable
[02:40.120 --> 02:44.880]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors
[02:44.880 --> 02:50.880]  If you have a product or a service that you'd like to advertise with us feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257
[02:50.880 --> 03:08.880]  This was Rick Rode with your lowdown for June 2nd 2017
[03:20.880 --> 03:22.880]  Right
[03:23.400 --> 03:30.720]  People being victimized by criminal cops psychopathic predators terrorizing neighborhood blocks the quip with pepper spray mace cuffs tasers and glocks
[03:30.720 --> 03:36.380]  They like serial killers acting out subliminal thought forget what you taught these cops have got a license to kill witness
[03:36.680 --> 03:41.620]  Intimidation means that they can use it at will go to silence means that the pigs will never let out a squeal and if they
[03:41.620 --> 03:44.120]  Go to court. They know the judge will make him a deal for real
[03:44.120 --> 03:46.640]  That's why they stopping me locking me up and stopping me
[03:46.640 --> 03:54.160]  Confiscating my property talking in my demography making the poor commodities profiting off of poverty and for some policy support prison economies
[03:54.160 --> 03:56.960]  Yeah, no one makes money when the violence stops hating
[03:56.960 --> 04:01.640]  Brutality is the way to make a criminal crop blood in the gut is how to risk whether they bred at the top
[04:01.640 --> 04:04.240]  That's why this is what happens when you call the cops
[04:04.240 --> 04:09.440]  Come on, this is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops
[04:09.640 --> 04:14.300]  This is what happens when you call the cops you get your rights violated or you walk inside
[04:14.300 --> 04:17.220]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[04:17.420 --> 04:19.780]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[04:20.020 --> 04:24.900]  This is what happens when you call the cops you get your rights violated or you all get shot
[04:28.780 --> 04:32.420]  Many things trying murder me they made me they gave me they trained them
[04:32.420 --> 04:38.220]  They need to grade and detain me and change just like slavery hands up face down left hook right quick
[04:38.220 --> 04:44.420]  Throw you down hold you down smack you with that nightstick night shift riding round see you with your J's on you'll get sprayed on
[04:44.420 --> 04:50.340]  Over skittles word to Trayvon all the people saying is this crazy down in Florida what you saying is you plan is the same in?
[04:50.540 --> 04:55.940]  California they hanging like they banging in the hanging down in Georgia frame you in a case for what you say without a lawyer
[04:56.260 --> 05:00.120]  Swarming with no warning now they sorting through your residence storming with no warrant now
[05:00.120 --> 05:06.180]  They snorting all the evidence you better just learn to dodge a box cuz this is what happens when you call the cops
[05:06.180 --> 05:08.700]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[05:08.960 --> 05:11.380]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[05:11.580 --> 05:16.040]  This is what happens when you call the cops you get your rights violated, or you hat
[05:16.200 --> 05:19.340]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[05:19.380 --> 05:21.620]  This is what happens when you call the cops
[05:21.800 --> 05:26.800]  This is what happens when you call the cops you get your rights violated, or you all get shot
[05:26.800 --> 05:31.780]  We got a baby in the living room get the crisis pull up and throw it in the crib throw. I'm away
[05:31.780 --> 05:35.860]  way. There's a homeless guy camping here. We'll tell him to pack. When he gets up and starts
[05:35.860 --> 05:40.100]  leaving shoot the bum in the back. This guy rolled through a stop sign. Let's approach for sale. Get
[05:40.100 --> 05:44.340]  some doctors to rape. We'll send him a bill in the mail. We got a black man knocking on a white
[05:44.340 --> 05:49.060]  woman's door. With ten shots point blank he ain't gonna knock no more. Look the problem starts at
[05:49.060 --> 05:53.860]  the academy. New cadets are indoctrinated with a military mentality. With them as the soldiers
[05:53.860 --> 05:58.900]  and us as the people that battle. We're either collateral damage or combat fatalities. All right
[05:58.900 --> 06:03.540]  folks good evening. This is the Monday night rule of law radio show with your host Eddie Craig.
[06:04.580 --> 06:09.620]  I apologize for the delay. We are trying to get a new microphone configuration set up and if I
[06:09.620 --> 06:14.260]  sound a little odd at the beginning segment that's why we're trying to get this thing tuned in just
[06:14.260 --> 06:20.900]  right. It's an extremely good microphone. The problem is it might be a little bit too good
[06:21.860 --> 06:28.420]  for this particular setup that I've had to have here. So that being said if we sound a little
[06:28.420 --> 06:32.260]  off in the first segment don't sweat it. We'll switch back if the things don't work out in the
[06:32.260 --> 06:38.980]  first one. Now that being said I don't have anything specific to go into with you tonight
[06:38.980 --> 06:44.900]  mainly because I spent most of my day working on a couple of cases that I've got going between
[06:44.900 --> 06:51.220]  Round Rock and San Antonio where the courts are doing their typical we're not going to play by
[06:51.220 --> 06:56.660]  the rules stuff. We're not going to give you proper notice stuff. We're going to violate
[06:56.660 --> 07:03.940]  your rights stuff and we're going to make you choke on it if we can. Well they can't. Not if
[07:03.940 --> 07:08.500]  I'm dealing with it they can't. Now the only question that leaves of course is whether or
[07:08.500 --> 07:12.900]  not the people I'm trying to help out with this are capable of delivering what they need to deliver
[07:12.900 --> 07:18.980]  when they appear in court. I can only go so far in this in helping you. I can do the paperwork.
[07:18.980 --> 07:26.980]  I can make sure that the arguments are there. But it becomes your duty and necessity to study
[07:26.980 --> 07:32.900]  and apply it appropriately. Now that's going to be true of anyone that's having to do this
[07:32.900 --> 07:38.580]  and fend for themselves. The big difference here is you're not having to do the legal research that
[07:38.580 --> 07:44.260]  would normally go into putting this up. That is the downside of the seminar if anything.
[07:44.260 --> 07:50.260]  The fact that most of the actual research and hard work has already been done for you
[07:50.900 --> 07:56.820]  tends to make some folks lazy. They think all they have to do is file the documents and it's
[07:56.820 --> 08:06.740]  a slam dunk nothing else is required of them. That is not true. Like anything else when you
[08:06.740 --> 08:12.020]  go to court you're the one that's going to have to speak. You're the one that's going to have to
[08:12.020 --> 08:17.620]  make the written argument that was made in the pleadings. You're the one that's going to have to
[08:17.620 --> 08:24.980]  object to what the prosecutor or the judge does in response. You're the one that's going to have to
[08:24.980 --> 08:32.020]  challenge their violations of law and your rights and when you fail to do that the record is going
[08:32.020 --> 08:40.340]  to work against you. Okay now the problem of course is when we go into courts of no record
[08:40.340 --> 08:47.300]  where there's no official transcript. At that point the only record is the one that you make.
[08:48.340 --> 08:55.380]  The way we will make the record both in non-record and record courts is going to be through written
[08:55.380 --> 09:00.260]  everything. We're going to do written pleadings and arguments. We are going to be doing written
[09:00.260 --> 09:06.020]  objections. We're going to be doing written judicial notices. We're going to do everything
[09:06.020 --> 09:14.340]  to make a record of what the law requires these people to do and exactly what our objections were
[09:14.340 --> 09:21.140]  in their failure to doing it. Now of course the Texas courts have worked long and hard to find
[09:21.140 --> 09:30.100]  ways to circumvent due process and make this the process itself of stealing our money or getting
[09:30.100 --> 09:37.620]  us into their jail system much more streamlined and efficient and cost effective for them. In
[09:37.620 --> 09:48.580]  other words the profit of the government is now put ahead of the needs justice and rights of the
[09:48.580 --> 09:56.340]  people and that doesn't really matter what state you're in but Texas has become extremely good at
[09:56.340 --> 10:05.380]  it. Why? Well that's easy because everyone in the system is in on the game except for the victim.
[10:07.140 --> 10:12.580]  See our system of government is set up where they're supposed to be a system of checks and
[10:12.580 --> 10:20.740]  balances on each other. When they're being totally cooperative in everything they do
[10:20.740 --> 10:29.380]  they are no longer a system of checks and balances because now whatever one does wrong
[10:29.380 --> 10:35.860]  the other attempts to cover up and smooth over to make it appear legitimate so that they can
[10:35.860 --> 10:42.260]  continue with the process no matter how wrong they are. No matter what rights are violated,
[10:42.260 --> 10:48.820]  no matter what laws are broken by those that are supposed to be upholding them. And that's
[10:48.820 --> 10:56.420]  just the way the game is rigged today and I will say once again that is the biggest problem with
[10:56.420 --> 11:03.380]  attorneys and attorneys being allowed to sit in any governmental office or to be the only ones in
[11:03.380 --> 11:12.020]  charge of a courtroom. They want you to think that they have some kind of special intuition that you
[11:12.020 --> 11:22.500]  do not when it comes to using common sense in relation to the law. One of the very maximums of
[11:22.500 --> 11:31.140]  law that these judges used to uphold is that the law itself cannot be the sole source of harm.
[11:31.140 --> 11:40.580]  And yet today that is all we see is law that causes more harm than it ever serves to prevent.
[11:43.460 --> 11:50.660]  Let's take a real close look at the traffic citation BS and take a perfect example of that.
[11:51.460 --> 11:57.700]  I've talked about this before but it's it's such a good well-known example you should be able to
[11:57.700 --> 12:06.100]  focus on it and understand what I mean. The Sandra Bland case. The young black woman that was here
[12:07.060 --> 12:20.100]  in Texas got stopped by a DPS officer allegedly for failing to use her turn signal to make a turn.
[12:20.100 --> 12:26.500]  Before that traffic, now this woman had committed no crimes, she had done absolutely nothing wrong,
[12:26.500 --> 12:35.940]  she had injured nobody, she had broken no actual law. None. Especially not one that never applied
[12:35.940 --> 12:41.460]  to her to begin with because she was in her private car going about her own business. She
[12:41.460 --> 12:49.540]  was not commercially driving as the code applies. So it didn't apply. It didn't apply. It didn't
[12:49.540 --> 13:01.620]  apply. But before the stop was over, this woman was assaulted, beaten, tased, handcuffed, and
[13:01.620 --> 13:11.620]  taken to jail because of a DPS officer on an ego trip. See, he made a request that she extinguish
[13:11.620 --> 13:18.580]  her cigarette. She was sitting in her car. She had every right to be smoking a cigarette sitting
[13:18.580 --> 13:25.860]  in her car. The officer had no lawful authority whatsoever to even request that she put it out.
[13:26.740 --> 13:34.340]  Much less to turn around and treat his request as if it was a lawful order that she had somehow
[13:34.340 --> 13:43.620]  disobeyed. When she refused to put her cigarette out, he became combative. He began the assault.
[13:43.620 --> 13:52.900]  He exerted an authority he did not have. He is responsible for her death three days later in the
[13:52.900 --> 14:02.020]  jail because he is the one that put her there absolutely illegally. There was no reason for
[14:02.020 --> 14:11.940]  her to ever have gone to a jail cell. None. Where is that DPS officer today? He ain't dead.
[14:11.940 --> 14:18.580]  He ain't dead. Sandra Bland is. He's not in jail. Sandra Bland was for three days.
[14:19.220 --> 14:25.380]  He has not been criminally charged. Sandra Bland was criminally charged for doing absolutely
[14:25.380 --> 14:38.100]  nothing wrong. Nothing. And we wonder what's wrong with the system. Well,
[14:38.100 --> 14:47.060]  all in all, it is your willingness to accept this type of behavior and this type of limitation upon
[14:47.060 --> 14:56.980]  individual rights that these people have cooked up to protect themselves in their crimes from
[14:56.980 --> 15:04.580]  having to be responsible and accountable to you and I. Not only for the injustice they commit
[15:04.580 --> 15:11.620]  and the crimes that they commit, but to make restitution to the victim of those crimes.
[15:15.700 --> 15:22.660]  I fail to understand how the state, which is nothing more than a political fiction,
[15:25.140 --> 15:30.340]  as far as the governmental agents acting under its supposed authority,
[15:30.340 --> 15:36.820]  are able to claim immunity for their acts against those that created the authority they have
[15:36.820 --> 15:47.300]  and the powers they use. Now, in a dictatorial country, that would be fine considering that the
[15:47.300 --> 15:54.180]  dictator didn't get his power from the people. He got it from brute force. But here in America,
[15:54.180 --> 16:01.860]  it's not supposed to be that way. And yet, that is exactly how this is working.
[16:03.460 --> 16:08.580]  They're right because they have brute force to make them right.
[16:11.220 --> 16:21.220]  End of story. The rule of law proves them wrong. The rule of law says these people should be
[16:21.220 --> 16:28.820]  punished for their actions. But these people have usurped the power to determine what the law is
[16:28.820 --> 16:36.340]  and what it means and how it applies to them that we the people never gave them. And they are using
[16:36.340 --> 16:45.700]  it in a dictatorial fashion against us. Now, are we going to do something about that one way or the
[16:45.700 --> 16:51.300]  other? Or are we going to allow it to continue? That's what we have to figure out. All right,
[16:51.300 --> 17:16.020]  folks, y'all hang on. We'll be right back after this break. So y'all hold on.
[17:21.300 --> 17:29.860]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. I click control, shift, delete,
[17:29.860 --> 17:37.460]  and then scroll down to cookies and clear them. Now, I go to logosradionetwork.com
[17:37.460 --> 17:41.860]  and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand side, bookmark the link,
[17:41.860 --> 17:49.380]  and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies. Consider it
[17:49.380 --> 17:54.500]  an early Christmas present. And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I
[17:54.500 --> 17:59.380]  give a little present to this radio network too. C is for cookie. C is for classified.
[18:02.500 --> 18:08.420]  It's the 2017 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser sponsored by Central Texas Gunworks,
[18:08.420 --> 18:13.860]  defense distributed and Fat Sal's Deli. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[18:13.860 --> 18:19.620]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gunworks, first place up for grabs
[18:19.620 --> 18:27.620]  a Spikes Tactical AR-15. Second place, Taurus PT-111 G2 9mm pistol. From Defense Distributed,
[18:27.620 --> 18:34.820]  third place, the AR-308 80% lower. Fourth place, the AR-15 80% lower. From Fat Sal's Deli,
[18:34.820 --> 18:40.420]  fifth place, $100 gift card from Fat Sal's Deli. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[18:40.420 --> 18:46.260]  That's logosradionetwork.com. Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101,
[18:46.260 --> 18:51.380]  you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[18:51.380 --> 18:57.940]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to logosradionetwork.com for details
[18:57.940 --> 19:11.460]  and donate today. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:28.820 --> 19:36.340]  Help I'm stepping into the twilight zone. Places in the madhouse, fields I've become.
[19:36.340 --> 19:40.580]  My beacon's been moved on the moon and star.
[19:40.580 --> 19:44.020]  Herbs are the gold, now they have fallen too far.
[19:44.020 --> 19:52.100]  So you will come and go, but the bullet hits the bone.
[19:52.100 --> 20:06.180]  So you will come and go, but the bullet hits the bone.
[20:06.180 --> 20:24.500]  All right, folks, we are back. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your
[20:24.500 --> 20:29.060]  host, Eddie Craig. I am ready to start taking your phone calls if you want to call in. Call
[20:29.060 --> 20:36.980]  in number is 512-646-1984. Right now, I've got one caller up on the board, but I would be more
[20:36.980 --> 20:42.420]  than happy to get some more. Right now, let's start out with Ralph in Texas. Ralph, what do you got?
[20:45.540 --> 20:49.300]  Hang on, Ralph. For some reason, my browser is not refreshing like it should here.
[20:49.300 --> 21:00.580]  Okay, am I on? You are now. Okay, I've got a case in the federal courts, and I don't know if they're
[21:00.580 --> 21:06.420]  just pulling my chain, trying to swamp me with paperwork, or if I'm doing it wrong. But it's
[21:06.420 --> 21:14.660]  still alive after a year, and there's motions to dismiss active, yet they want to do discovery.
[21:14.660 --> 21:22.740]  So, I don't know. What I'm wondering is, is there anyone that's got any experience with the federal
[21:22.740 --> 21:29.140]  courts—remember, Jeff and Marilyn used to have a lot of experience with that—that I can kind of
[21:29.140 --> 21:39.700]  get some feedback from? I do not know the answer to that, Ralph. I don't know what other people are
[21:39.700 --> 21:46.180]  doing successfully or not. They don't tell me everything. Right, right. Okay, well, I had to ask,
[21:46.180 --> 21:52.100]  because, like I said, it looks like they're trying to swamp me. You know, the judges will actually
[21:53.700 --> 21:59.300]  dismiss a case, and then when it goes to appeal, the appeals courts overturn it, and, you know,
[21:59.300 --> 22:05.780]  it's nothing to the judge. They're not held accountable for the mistakes they make,
[22:05.780 --> 22:13.060]  so it's hard to tell when what a judge is telling you is true or is either wrong or just a mistake.
[22:13.620 --> 22:19.940]  You don't ever know, so if you got any input on that, I'd appreciate it. I'm also,
[22:23.220 --> 22:28.340]  maybe you'd be interested in going over an amended complaint?
[22:28.340 --> 22:36.980]  An amended complaint? You can send it. I don't know when I'm going to be able to get to it,
[22:36.980 --> 22:44.180]  but you can send it. Well, no, I'd be willing to pay you to stay up late one night.
[22:45.220 --> 22:49.780]  Yeah, well, I'm doing plenty of that now. Right now, I've got more than 200 different cases I'm
[22:49.780 --> 22:55.460]  working on, and like I say, I've spent most of the day working on two of them that I've got
[22:55.460 --> 23:01.540]  and trying to rotate between them as I can. Yeah, I heard that in the intro. Yeah, you've got
[23:02.180 --> 23:09.220]  two active cases you're working on right now and then all the other people. Well, I guess you've
[23:09.220 --> 23:14.100]  got other callers there. I'm not real sure I have a specific question other than, you know,
[23:14.100 --> 23:18.340]  where in the heck is the people that know anything about, you know, federal courts?
[23:18.340 --> 23:29.140]  Well, now there's, in my discussion group, we do have some folks that do Title 42 complaints and
[23:29.140 --> 23:36.420]  help you study how to do them properly. And so if you're on Facebook, you can join my Tao of Law
[23:36.420 --> 23:42.260]  group and you want to speak to a gentleman by the name of Jerry Howe, who can hook you up with all
[23:42.260 --> 23:49.380]  the necessary materials on how to do a Title 42 correctly. Now, jurisdictionary will also teach
[23:49.380 --> 23:57.220]  you how to do one, but it just handles basic lawsuits. It doesn't help do anything specific
[23:57.220 --> 24:04.580]  to a governmental lawsuit. And that's what a Title 42 generally is. It can be used for more than that.
[24:04.580 --> 24:11.700]  But for most of the time, it's a governmental lawsuit. So I, I've got the jurisdictionary
[24:11.700 --> 24:18.180]  and I tried contacting Jerry Howe and that didn't work out. Maybe I should try again. I don't know
[24:18.180 --> 24:21.940]  how much experience he's got. I've heard him mention him a couple of times and he does have
[24:21.940 --> 24:30.260]  some pretty good material on the internet, but about, you know, actual procedures is what I'm
[24:30.260 --> 24:34.980]  having trouble with. You know, I mean, how am I going to figure out, let's say that the judge
[24:34.980 --> 24:47.300]  dismisses part or grants part of a dismissal. And then another defendant also is granted
[24:47.300 --> 24:53.300]  completely their dismissal. And then so, and he does it a week apart. Well, how does my appeal
[24:53.300 --> 24:58.900]  work at that? You know, which state does the appeal come off of? I haven't studied the appeals.
[24:58.900 --> 25:02.100]  I know they're in the book. I've looked at them, haven't studied them, but let's say that I've got
[25:02.100 --> 25:08.900]  about 30 days to do a notice of appeal and to perfect appeal on 45 days to actually write the
[25:08.900 --> 25:13.060]  appeal and have it for the appeals court. Does that go off of the first date? Do I have to do
[25:13.060 --> 25:18.900]  two or three of them? Do I have to do, you know, file? Well, most of the time everything is
[25:18.900 --> 25:28.980]  consecutive, not, or I'm sorry, sequential. So generally you don't have to do this thing until
[25:28.980 --> 25:33.140]  that thing has gone through the process and a ruling has been made on it or some other thing's
[25:33.140 --> 25:39.540]  been done to it that needs to be done. That's not always the case, but the rules of procedures
[25:39.540 --> 25:43.780]  should tell you how it goes. The rules of appellate procedures should tell you how it goes.
[25:44.980 --> 25:48.260]  Yeah, well, I'm at the point where I'm running out of time and I was hoping somebody could help me
[25:48.260 --> 25:54.660]  shortcut that, you know, because I know I need to study. That's never a problem. I can study,
[25:54.660 --> 25:59.140]  but there's only so much studying a person can do when they're piling this up on me. Okay,
[25:59.140 --> 26:03.780]  so I've got three days to do a legal session. Yeah, this is the reason why I tell people before
[26:03.780 --> 26:08.740]  they start a fight, they need to study how the fight's going to go step by step and start getting
[26:09.780 --> 26:13.540]  at least a procedure written down they know they got to follow or may have to follow.
[26:14.260 --> 26:18.420]  That's where the beforehand study before you ever start a lawsuit begins.
[26:19.700 --> 26:24.340]  Yeah, those are excellent words and I did not do that and I am paying the price now.
[26:24.340 --> 26:29.300]  Yeah, playing catch up while you're trying to get ready for an appeal, never a good idea.
[26:30.580 --> 26:39.540]  Right, okay. Well, just so you'll know, I am using the rule 1.2. They are ignoring it to some degree,
[26:39.540 --> 26:44.740]  but yet they're actually maybe listening to it because they're doing something else strange.
[26:45.700 --> 26:53.300]  So far, I've got 17 defendants and the judge has dismissed all of them except the arresting
[26:53.300 --> 26:57.060]  officer, but I think they're just playing a game with me. I think they're going to give me the
[26:57.060 --> 27:02.180]  arresting officer now and then the appeals court's going to say, oh, okay, well, no, the judge made
[27:02.180 --> 27:06.660]  an error in that. But what I did was when the judge said he was going to give me the arresting
[27:06.660 --> 27:11.700]  officer, I took his argument and I bolstered it. In other words, I made it stronger. I said,
[27:11.700 --> 27:17.620]  well, yeah, that's a good reason to give me the arresting officer, but you forgot rule 1.2.
[27:17.620 --> 27:22.980]  You see? So I gave him, he had one reason and I gave him a couple more.
[27:25.140 --> 27:27.220]  Did you do that as a motion to reconsider?
[27:29.940 --> 27:35.620]  Let me think. Let me think. I did that as an objection to a recommendation.
[27:36.340 --> 27:41.220]  Okay. But an objection doesn't move the court to do anything with the objection. It's just a
[27:41.220 --> 27:48.100]  uh, it's just a filed objection to what they did do. If you want the judge to reconsider what he
[27:48.100 --> 27:53.380]  did and use the information out of rule 1.2, you should file a motion to reconsider.
[27:57.540 --> 28:05.220]  Well, I had, uh, according to him, I had, uh, I had 14 days to do an objection,
[28:05.220 --> 28:13.140]  so this is the magistrate's report recommendation to the judge. So, you know, that's what they're
[28:13.140 --> 28:17.860]  saying. Uh, yeah, mostly reconsidered sounds good, but they never, they didn't give me that
[28:17.860 --> 28:24.340]  option. I don't think I didn't do it regardless. Uh, and, uh, so, uh,
[28:26.980 --> 28:31.140]  all right. Well, yeah. Okay. Well, I'm going to get on, uh, you said your Facebook account
[28:31.140 --> 28:39.860]  or something. Yeah. Well, my Facebook group, towel of law, T A O O F L A W. Now there is a group with
[28:39.860 --> 28:48.820]  that name and there is a page with that name you want to ask to join the group. Okay. Okay.
[28:50.260 --> 28:56.420]  Yeah. Okay. And then, uh, yeah, maybe I can get, uh, some answers, uh, to some of my questions.
[28:56.420 --> 29:01.940]  That'd be great. Appreciate it. Yes, sir. No problem. You have a great night. Thank
[29:01.940 --> 29:08.340]  you very much. Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in. All right. Again, folks call in number is
[29:08.340 --> 29:16.180]  512-646-1984. If you want to call in and ask any questions, Ralph's the only caller I had.
[29:16.180 --> 29:20.580]  So I went ahead and took him, but I don't have any more at the moment. So that being said,
[29:20.580 --> 29:25.780]  let me make sure the phones are still on just in case when my web browser is acting over here,
[29:25.780 --> 29:32.980]  it's hard to say what it is and what it didn't. And as you can tell, we're having thunder or
[29:32.980 --> 29:37.940]  something outside. Cause microphone he's picking up roaring that I don't know where it is unless
[29:37.940 --> 29:42.180]  my belly's groveling and I can't hear it. All right, folks, we're about to take a break. So
[29:42.180 --> 29:58.020]  y'all hang in there and we'll be right back. 512-646-1984, and we'll be right back.
[30:01.780 --> 30:06.580]  Email is a convenient way to send and receive information, but it can also let advertisers
[30:06.580 --> 30:12.500]  snoop on you. Invisible web bugs in email messages could be monitoring your every click. I'm Dr.
[30:12.500 --> 30:17.780]  Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with more in just a moment. Privacy is under attack. When
[30:17.780 --> 30:22.980]  you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[30:22.980 --> 30:28.900]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[30:28.900 --> 30:34.660]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. This public service
[30:34.660 --> 30:40.020]  announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:40.020 --> 30:48.180]  Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. Web bugs, web beacons, pixel tags, and clear GIFs.
[30:48.180 --> 30:53.140]  They have many names, but these tiny invisible image files usually have one purpose only to
[30:53.140 --> 30:58.660]  track your online behavior. Web bugs are commonly used on web pages, but they can also be embedded
[30:58.660 --> 31:04.020]  in email messages to report exactly when you open a message, the IP address of the computer
[31:04.020 --> 31:08.660]  that read the message, and whether you click on links contained in the message. The best way to
[31:08.660 --> 31:13.780]  fight a web bug invasion is to use a privacy-friendly email service that filters them out.
[31:13.780 --> 31:19.380]  You can also set your email client to block email message images or opt for a text-only email.
[31:20.020 --> 31:24.260]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:24.260 --> 31:36.020]  What are you thinking? Microplant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for
[31:36.020 --> 31:42.740]  around $10 a month. HempUSA.org has 12 formulations of microplant powder for absorbing and removing
[31:42.740 --> 31:47.940]  toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:47.940 --> 31:53.540]  It alkalizes oxygenate, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products that saves you space,
[31:53.540 --> 31:59.620]  time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 only at HempUSA.org.
[32:24.100 --> 32:28.420]  Through Due Process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has
[32:28.420 --> 32:32.340]  put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what Due
[32:32.340 --> 32:36.740]  Process is and how to hold courts to the Rule of Law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable
[32:36.740 --> 32:40.980]  material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now,
[32:40.980 --> 32:44.900]  you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:44.900 --> 32:49.380]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful
[32:49.380 --> 32:52.900]  resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from Rule
[32:52.900 --> 32:57.780]  of Law Radio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want
[32:57.780 --> 33:23.860]  and deserve. Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:27.780 --> 33:47.860]  Don't stop me.
[33:57.780 --> 34:16.500]  All right folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[34:17.140 --> 34:20.660]  And I got something kind of screwy going on tonight. I tried to load a...
[34:20.660 --> 34:25.380]  I stopped using Firefox because it was constantly crashing and becoming a memory hog.
[34:25.380 --> 34:31.940]  Google Chrome now suddenly is misbehaving all over the place. I know this thing is free of
[34:31.940 --> 34:36.420]  spyware and other garbage, but I got to figure out what's going on with that and see if I can't
[34:36.420 --> 34:43.380]  solve that little problem. Plus the fact that now every time I try to unmute somebody, the thing
[34:43.380 --> 34:49.620]  opens new tabs every time I do something. I got to figure that out too. All right, Jerry in Missouri.
[34:49.620 --> 34:55.940]  What can we do for you? Oh, this is Jerry. What's going on, man? Oh, nothing much, Jerry. How's
[34:55.940 --> 35:04.100]  things treating you? Very good. I was listening to your car. What was his name? Do you remember?
[35:05.780 --> 35:13.140]  Well, I'll... First name. Yeah, don't start me lying, man. I can't remember things between one
[35:13.140 --> 35:16.260]  break and another with all the crap that's going on here right now. I'm surprised I remember my
[35:16.260 --> 35:29.860]  name. George, isn't it? Yeah. Anyway, a lot of people... Sometimes I've gotten friend requests
[35:29.860 --> 35:42.020]  from people and it'll be somebody doesn't have a picture on their deal or just tell people to
[35:42.020 --> 35:52.020]  message me or something. That'd be fine. But then again, if they're not my friend, sometimes I don't
[35:52.020 --> 36:01.300]  see those notifications. But anyway, yeah, I'd like to try to help some of these people if I
[36:01.300 --> 36:08.340]  could. But then again, like I said before, I haven't actually taken a case to court yet. I've
[36:08.340 --> 36:19.300]  just gone by some different people who I believe have gone in there and done a good job as prosays.
[36:19.300 --> 36:25.940]  But that's really the problem I run into the most is people have already shot their feet off.
[36:28.660 --> 36:34.580]  Yeah, the biggest problem we have is when folks do this and they mess something up and have no
[36:34.580 --> 36:46.820]  way to recover from what they just did. Yeah, that gets really frustrating. Now I've got a group
[36:47.620 --> 36:57.300]  of people near in it. But even there, I think there are some people in that group that have
[36:57.300 --> 37:05.860]  some good cases. And I'm not really sure why I have tried to goad them into it. But because I
[37:05.860 --> 37:09.860]  you know, I believe they, you know, seem to me like they've studied enough.
[37:15.140 --> 37:22.100]  They have a pretty good clue what's going on. I don't know. Maybe it's the 400 bucks.
[37:22.100 --> 37:29.380]  I don't know. Well, possibly, folks, I apologize if y'all can hear that static and everything
[37:29.380 --> 37:34.580]  that's coming through this. The bad weather is coming down hard here at the moment. And if we do
[37:34.580 --> 37:40.260]  get cut off or anything, it'll be because we lost power. So everybody, please be aware. Hopefully,
[37:40.260 --> 37:43.460]  it'll be because it hit the transformer down the street and not the house directly.
[37:44.180 --> 37:50.180]  But again, I apologize for any background noise going on right now. Like I say, this mic is
[37:50.180 --> 37:54.980]  extremely sensitive. As I used to say in the movie, Blue Thunder, this thing could pick up
[37:54.980 --> 38:05.860]  a mouse fart at 300 feet. All right, Jerry, go ahead. Well, yeah, basically, I was just,
[38:05.860 --> 38:11.460]  you know, putting out there that, you know, if people are going to friend me on Facebook,
[38:11.460 --> 38:17.620]  it'd be a pretty good idea to to use a name that sounds like a real person's name and
[38:17.620 --> 38:24.740]  maybe put a profile picture on there in a way that, you know, have something on your wall that
[38:25.620 --> 38:31.460]  looks like you're not just somebody trying to spam me because I get really tired of that crap.
[38:31.460 --> 38:35.780]  So yeah, I'm the same way. If I get a friend request from someone I don't know, I message
[38:35.780 --> 38:40.420]  them back and ask who they are and why they want to be my friend. And I get them 24 hours
[38:40.420 --> 38:48.340]  to respond and then I just delete the friend request. Right. And I do just about the exactly
[38:48.340 --> 38:55.300]  the same thing. You know, well, anyway, I won't hang you up. There's probably other people who
[38:55.300 --> 39:03.780]  want to call me. All right. Well, I appreciate you calling in. All right, man. All right. Thanks.
[39:03.780 --> 39:12.340]  All right. Thanks. All right. Now, that being said, we have Scott in New York. Scott,
[39:12.340 --> 39:17.300]  what can we do for you? Hello there. I think it's the first time I ever spoke through the
[39:17.300 --> 39:24.500]  phone, not through the speaker. All right. Nice to speak with you. I've listened to a couple of
[39:24.500 --> 39:30.980]  your shows. I've talked on Facebook a couple of times. I have a really very complex issue,
[39:30.980 --> 39:37.140]  one of a kind began 12 years ago, but I won't go into that. But of late I've been getting a
[39:37.140 --> 39:45.460]  grasp of stuff and I'm starting to, I guess that, well, I had just had my two cases dismissed in
[39:45.460 --> 39:49.780]  June. One was an electric scooter in New York City, the scooter law. Another was suspended
[39:49.780 --> 39:54.740]  license. They dismissed them both and sealed them just a few days ago. So they still have my
[39:54.740 --> 40:00.420]  scooter. But what that case did was take me away from I'm a victim of corruption. That was Queens,
[40:00.420 --> 40:08.980]  New York. Nassau County police do what my story is from 12 years ago, that they are playing
[40:08.980 --> 40:14.580]  hardball with me because I called the cops on a cop. Anyway, I won't go into it. It's very long,
[40:14.580 --> 40:20.500]  complex. However, my thing is I was going after a policeman that's involved in the big corruption
[40:20.500 --> 40:27.860]  scandal from Malvern for an accident report that he wrote that was false that got my friend
[40:27.860 --> 40:33.780]  canceled. I was driving her vehicle and it was a three-year deadline to bring a suit. And I went
[40:33.780 --> 40:39.060]  to the small claims court and she was successful in taking out a claim for out of pocket three
[40:39.060 --> 40:44.500]  grand for the kid against the kid who had the accident. I was doing the officer who wrote the
[40:44.500 --> 40:49.860]  report to seize involved with corruption scandal. And that was bringing back something from years
[40:49.860 --> 40:54.980]  ago. So reopened the statute of limitations. Now it's current again. And it turned me away
[40:54.980 --> 40:59.140]  at the window and it relates. I'm sorry, this is wrong. There's something you said on one of
[40:59.140 --> 41:04.420]  the shows that it was, you were talking about how it's patronized stuff that you have to provide
[41:04.420 --> 41:12.100]  three forms of ID. That was from video I had seen. And he said it's Supreme court case. I'm trying
[41:12.100 --> 41:16.180]  to find the Supreme court case. And then I heard you talking about it and you were saying that's
[41:16.180 --> 41:21.780]  bullshit. Oh, sorry, because yeah, please watch the language. All right, everyone have a cow.
[41:21.780 --> 41:26.820]  You keep doing that. I'm sorry. I won't do it again. So I went to the window of the small
[41:26.820 --> 41:31.620]  claims court. They took my friend's suit and she actually missed the date because she's so busy
[41:31.620 --> 41:38.260]  with other court cases, but mine, they refused to take my small claims suit. Six different clerks
[41:38.260 --> 41:42.580]  came to the window. I spoke to them. One woman had me rewrite it. And it comes down to, they're
[41:42.580 --> 41:50.180]  telling me I'm in the wrong court. My, my reality is as a federal rules of civil procedure, um,
[41:50.180 --> 41:55.620]  rule five, they can't refuse to anything at the window. They have to take your documents.
[41:55.620 --> 42:00.660]  Well, whether they, they look like a lawyer made them or not, a judge could refuse it,
[42:00.660 --> 42:06.500]  but so six clerks refused the paperwork. And as I said, it was the last day of the statute of
[42:06.500 --> 42:11.140]  limitations. It's three years since this incident happened. It was a fake accident. I bumped the
[42:11.140 --> 42:16.980]  kid's mirror. Nothing happened to his car and I broke my mirror. The accident report said
[42:16.980 --> 42:21.620]  different. I video. Anyway, the deal is it's fraud from the get-go. The kid had no damage.
[42:21.620 --> 42:28.500]  He got three grand and it's all based on the proximate cause is that officer. There's no way
[42:28.500 --> 42:34.260]  the kid could have done that without the officer. And that officer, as I mentioned, is tied right.
[42:35.140 --> 42:39.140]  They were very malware and deadly involved. They pulled me over to set me up
[42:39.140 --> 42:45.940]  back. And I was, you know, this officer is dirty. He's doing this on purpose. There was,
[42:45.940 --> 42:50.820]  and I videotaped the accident showing the officer, look, this is damage here. Had nothing to do with
[42:50.820 --> 42:56.180]  our accident. You see the rust. And I showed him this. We had contact, the mirrors. He has no
[42:56.180 --> 43:02.100]  damage. His mirror didn't break. My side view mirror did. So moral of the story is the kid got
[43:02.100 --> 43:08.260]  three grand. My friend got canceled. Her insurance is a double. She wasn't even able to hold the kid
[43:08.260 --> 43:14.260]  accountable cause she's very old, very sick. And the police and the services are gone. Anyway,
[43:14.260 --> 43:19.380]  I was hoping to take care of this for her by going after the officer. You can't claim for her.
[43:20.260 --> 43:26.020]  You understand that, right? You can't claim for her. No, I'm not claiming for her. I'm claiming
[43:26.020 --> 43:31.780]  that this officer wrote. I don't actually remember what the claim was that I'm like really
[43:31.780 --> 43:36.260]  doing a billion things tonight too. Like you are in the middle of, and I was even listening to
[43:36.260 --> 43:41.300]  another show. Yeah, but the thing is what I'm trying to get to here is I'm trying to understand
[43:41.300 --> 43:48.020]  what you think your cause of action is. You did not suffer any personal harm. You did not suffer
[43:48.020 --> 43:53.060]  any personal injury. It was not your property. That creates a problem. Hang on a sec. We'll
[43:53.060 --> 43:57.220]  address this more on the other side. All right, folks, we'll be right back. So y'all hold on.
[44:00.580 --> 44:05.700]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? When your case without an attorney with
[44:05.700 --> 44:13.380]  Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours
[44:13.380 --> 44:19.620]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a
[44:19.620 --> 44:25.620]  lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course,
[44:25.620 --> 44:32.340]  and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[44:32.340 --> 44:37.780]  winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[44:37.780 --> 44:43.540]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[44:43.540 --> 44:51.220]  our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[44:51.220 --> 45:03.380]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EASY.
[45:03.380 --> 45:07.220]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[45:07.220 --> 45:11.540]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[45:11.540 --> 45:16.260]  Suite D here in Austin, Texas to find Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic
[45:16.260 --> 45:20.740]  health and wellness products with your very own eyes. Have a look at our Miracle Healing
[45:20.740 --> 45:24.740]  Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a peek at some of our other
[45:24.740 --> 45:29.620]  wonderful products including our Australian Emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps,
[45:29.620 --> 45:38.340]  and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.340 --> 45:45.620]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook for
[45:45.620 --> 45:51.940]  information on events and our products. Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.620 --> 46:26.500]  To the street, now did you read the news today? They say the danger's gone our way,
[46:26.500 --> 46:36.100]  but I can see the fire's still light, burning into the night. There's too many men,
[46:36.100 --> 46:44.980]  too many people, picking too many problems. And I must love to go around,
[46:44.980 --> 46:48.100]  can't you see this is a land of confusion?
[46:51.780 --> 46:58.820]  This is the world we live in, and these are the hands we give up.
[46:58.820 --> 47:14.820]  Use them, let's start trying, to make it a place worth living in.
[47:14.820 --> 47:22.820]  Oh Superman, where are you now? When everything's gone wrong somehow.
[47:22.820 --> 47:30.820]  For men of steel and men of power, losing control by the hour.
[47:30.820 --> 47:38.820]  This is the time, this is the place, for we look for the future.
[47:38.820 --> 47:46.820]  But there's not much to love to go around. Tell me why this is a land of confusion.
[47:46.820 --> 47:56.820]  This is the world we live in, and these are the hands we give up.
[47:56.820 --> 48:18.820]  Use them, let's start trying, to make it a place worth living in.
[48:26.820 --> 48:36.820]  I remember long ago, when the sun was shining.
[48:36.820 --> 48:42.820]  And the stars were bright, all through the night.
[48:42.820 --> 48:56.820]  I'm the sound of your laughter, as I held you tight, so long ago.
[49:12.820 --> 49:14.820]  Alright Scott, let's see if we can continue this.
[49:14.820 --> 49:20.820]  Since you have no direct injury in this, neither property nor person,
[49:20.820 --> 49:24.820]  where do you figure you're getting any standing to pursue anything?
[49:24.820 --> 49:30.820]  Oh well, I will disagree with that, but as I said, it was three years ago, and I'm in the middle of a...
[49:30.820 --> 49:34.820]  Well, based upon what you just told me, I don't know how you would disagree with that.
[49:34.820 --> 49:38.820]  The property was your friend's, correct?
[49:38.820 --> 49:40.820]  The what, say again?
[49:40.820 --> 49:44.820]  The property, the car you were in, was your friend's, right?
[49:44.820 --> 49:45.820]  Yes.
[49:45.820 --> 49:50.820]  The insurance the kid collected from was your friend's, right?
[49:50.820 --> 49:52.820]  The insurance the kid, yes.
[49:52.820 --> 49:57.820]  Okay, where did you suffer an injury?
[49:57.820 --> 50:01.820]  Let me restate, I don't remember this as something from three years ago,
[50:01.820 --> 50:04.820]  I'm working on a lot of current things now, and it's very complex,
[50:04.820 --> 50:08.820]  but the insurance company that's involved is involved through the...
[50:08.820 --> 50:11.820]  I'm going to drop that, let me just make one statement.
[50:11.820 --> 50:15.820]  So the video I was talking about that you mentioned like two weeks ago,
[50:15.820 --> 50:19.820]  you said it was gibberish, where you have to produce three forms of ID,
[50:19.820 --> 50:22.820]  a public servant if they're working in that capacity, and you ask them,
[50:22.820 --> 50:26.820]  and this is a video you spoke about, it was like two, three weeks ago,
[50:26.820 --> 50:28.820]  you don't recall what I'm talking about?
[50:28.820 --> 50:34.820]  No, you're talking about when you demand, they demand that you do it, or you demand that they do it?
[50:34.820 --> 50:39.820]  That I demand that, for instance, the clerks behind the window wouldn't give me ID,
[50:39.820 --> 50:45.820]  and I just want to go back, and I could use rule five, I could use...
[50:45.820 --> 50:47.820]  Rule five of what?
[50:47.820 --> 50:49.820]  The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
[50:49.820 --> 50:55.820]  What does Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has to do with a day-to-day interaction with a clerk?
[50:55.820 --> 50:58.820]  Because he didn't take my paperwork, that was...
[50:58.820 --> 51:02.820]  That's still not applicable under the rules of Federal Procedure.
[51:02.820 --> 51:10.820]  That has to do with a case filed in federal court, not a daily interaction with a county or city clerk.
[51:10.820 --> 51:16.820]  Okay, so then maybe I'm goofing on that, so you're saying he could refuse my paperwork?
[51:16.820 --> 51:23.820]  I didn't say anything about your paperwork, I'm talking about your demand for ID from them.
[51:23.820 --> 51:25.820]  Yeah, so they don't have to produce ID?
[51:25.820 --> 51:27.820]  Well, I can go back and get the ID.
[51:27.820 --> 51:30.820]  Anyway, let me fast forward to a more recent that is current in my head,
[51:30.820 --> 51:33.820]  as I said, that's three years ago, and I'm doing 20 other things before...
[51:33.820 --> 51:39.820]  Well, I'm trying to answer what you bring up, so if you got something different you won't answer it, you need to ask it.
[51:39.820 --> 51:44.820]  Well, during the commercial, I looked at my paperwork, and I do things sequentially, not multitasked,
[51:44.820 --> 51:47.820]  and I'm doing 40 things at once, brother.
[51:47.820 --> 51:48.820]  You won't believe it.
[51:48.820 --> 51:50.820]  However, let me ask you something that will be.
[51:50.820 --> 51:54.820]  I had the two cases that with Justice Smith and Queens that happened last June,
[51:54.820 --> 52:00.820]  riding the New York City electric bike law, which really is...
[52:00.820 --> 52:04.820]  It was a wake-up call to me because I was aware of the movie Who Killed the Electric Car,
[52:04.820 --> 52:10.820]  and what's going on with the New York City bike law and the same law they're using in other cities
[52:10.820 --> 52:15.820]  is what's depicted in that movie. It's just now current.
[52:15.820 --> 52:19.820]  Well, I haven't seen the movie, and I don't know how many listeners have seen the movie,
[52:19.820 --> 52:24.820]  so I don't have a frame of reference for what you're using this information to lead up to.
[52:24.820 --> 52:29.820]  Well, I hear you're busy, but I would strongly suggest you watch it
[52:29.820 --> 52:33.820]  because what is shown in that movie is not even stronger today.
[52:33.820 --> 52:39.820]  Well, Scott, the only problem is I can't answer your question now if I go watch the movie later.
[52:39.820 --> 52:44.820]  So if you got a question I can answer for you, I will do my best.
[52:44.820 --> 52:49.820]  Ken, I'll ask you a question you can't answer. Okay, so here's the deal.
[52:49.820 --> 52:53.820]  I was arrested and they took my scooter for evidence last June, June 30th.
[52:53.820 --> 52:58.820]  I dismissed that case in another case that I won't discuss just about a month ago.
[52:58.820 --> 53:03.820]  I have a second appearance in small claims court where I'm suing that officer
[53:03.820 --> 53:08.820]  that took my scooter June 30th last June, and it's still on property as I speak to you.
[53:08.820 --> 53:13.820]  I'm suing him in small claims. I already tried once, and he showed up from an attorney,
[53:13.820 --> 53:17.820]  and I spoke for a minute. They turned white and said they need more time, as much as possible,
[53:17.820 --> 53:22.820]  and I gave them more time that time. Why did you give them more time?
[53:22.820 --> 53:29.820]  Because I was busy also, as I mentioned. Too busy to get your scooter back or to win?
[53:29.820 --> 53:34.820]  To win. I was too busy. I don't want to give away all my secrets now.
[53:34.820 --> 53:39.820]  This is still common, but the question is now I have an appearance and he's going to show up again,
[53:39.820 --> 53:43.820]  and they still have my – so now everything changes.
[53:43.820 --> 53:49.820]  I was going – my cause of action was he was operating outside of the supreme law of the land,
[53:49.820 --> 53:53.820]  and his – oh, now it's changed. Now they dismissed the cases.
[53:53.820 --> 53:59.820]  They admitted, you know, and I've lost my vocation. I really – with the suspended license thing, I'm injured.
[53:59.820 --> 54:02.820]  I had two bosses. I subcontract from an emergency plumber.
[54:02.820 --> 54:07.820]  Both of them lost me. They have new people to replace me. The other guy's nice about it.
[54:07.820 --> 54:12.820]  He says maybe I could use you on the weekend, but I haven't got – anyway, I've been out of work now for a year,
[54:12.820 --> 54:15.820]  because these bastards took my – sorry. I'm sorry I did that again.
[54:15.820 --> 54:22.820]  They took my scooter, and then they came right after me again, and again, this is tied to the corruption, so it gets tricky.
[54:22.820 --> 54:24.820]  But the deal is I have a court date.
[54:24.820 --> 54:32.820]  What should I substantiate the $5,000 I'm suing him in Smalls Plains Court now that it's a done deal?
[54:32.820 --> 54:34.820]  They dismissed and sealed both cases.
[54:34.820 --> 54:38.820]  Clearly, I have injuries. I have harm. They still have my property.
[54:38.820 --> 54:42.820]  And what are you claiming as an injury or harm?
[54:42.820 --> 54:47.820]  I was claiming he was operating. I was claiming what I said. Now it's changed.
[54:47.820 --> 54:54.820]  So now I wouldn't mind taking some suggestions. I have some angles that I don't want to go into.
[54:54.820 --> 54:58.820]  What does New York say your causes of action are, Scott?
[54:58.820 --> 55:05.820]  Under these circumstances, what are you allowed to sue him for?
[55:05.820 --> 55:09.820]  Well, for the jobs that I lost while my phone was in property.
[55:09.820 --> 55:18.820]  So that's a cause of action in New York, that you can sue for lost income or lost wages because of the officer's actions?
[55:18.820 --> 55:26.820]  What are you required to prove in your suit in order to win that argument and that cause?
[55:26.820 --> 55:28.820]  Well, what I was going to prove now.
[55:28.820 --> 55:33.820]  I didn't ask what you were going to prove. I asked what you are required to prove.
[55:33.820 --> 55:43.820]  How do you prove the elements of your complaint in such a way to meet the cause of action and win it?
[55:43.820 --> 55:46.820]  Well, I would like to hear some suggestions from you.
[55:46.820 --> 55:51.820]  I don't know what they are. I haven't read the cause of action in New York to see what they are.
[55:51.820 --> 55:56.820]  That's part of what you're supposed to do if you're going to pick a fight with these people.
[55:56.820 --> 56:05.820]  You have to read that and understand what the elements of your claim are and then figure out how you can use the facts to prove them.
[56:05.820 --> 56:07.820]  I didn't pick the fight with them.
[56:07.820 --> 56:08.820]  You're suing him, right?
[56:08.820 --> 56:09.820]  Sorry.
[56:09.820 --> 56:11.820]  You're suing him, right?
[56:11.820 --> 56:12.820]  Yeah.
[56:12.820 --> 56:14.820]  Then you picked the fight.
[56:14.820 --> 56:17.820]  As far as the claim goes, you picked the fight.
[56:17.820 --> 56:22.820]  Well, I've been trying to get them in court for 12 years, brother. I can't leave.
[56:22.820 --> 56:28.820]  Okay, well, the thing is there are some people that can't wait to try to jump over a car either.
[56:28.820 --> 56:34.820]  And then there are those that don't prepare for it and wind up on their face or run over.
[56:34.820 --> 56:40.820]  I'm trying to ask if you're one of those or if you're someone that actually trained for this.
[56:40.820 --> 56:42.820]  Well, I'm doing my best, yes.
[56:42.820 --> 56:49.820]  And I'm a little overwhelmed, but, yes, I'm training for this and I seem to have what it takes, too.
[56:49.820 --> 56:58.820]  Okay, well, again, if you've trained for this, then you had to write a complaint against the cop and file it in your suit, did you not?
[56:58.820 --> 56:59.820]  I did.
[56:59.820 --> 57:10.820]  And in that complaint, you had to state each of the causes of action as your claim of injury or restitution to which you are entitled
[57:10.820 --> 57:19.820]  and state the elements of that and how the facts align with the elements to prove your claim, right?
[57:19.820 --> 57:22.820]  Okay.
[57:22.820 --> 57:27.820]  Not okay, did you or didn't you?
[57:27.820 --> 57:30.820]  Um, I don't really know.
[57:30.820 --> 57:37.820]  Then you are not prepared and you are not training for this if you don't know.
[57:37.820 --> 57:44.820]  How do you file a lawsuit and win it when you don't know what you're supposed to be arguing about and how to do it so you can win?
[57:44.820 --> 57:49.820]  Well, my argument changed just two weeks ago and they dismissed it. My argument, I was going to...
[57:49.820 --> 57:53.820]  How did your original argument change because of something else?
[57:53.820 --> 57:59.820]  I can see it adding causes of action, I can see it taking away causes of action,
[57:59.820 --> 58:05.820]  but I can't see it changing any of those that remain if you already had them.
[58:05.820 --> 58:12.820]  Well, to tell you the truth, the officer that I am suing, he was directed from a different officer that I would like to...
[58:12.820 --> 58:17.820]  What I'm using against this man, I would like to use against that man, but I don't want to give it away.
[58:17.820 --> 58:23.820]  But I have been doing some research, I've been studying with people like Yochauva for a couple of years now.
[58:23.820 --> 58:26.820]  I'm just not well spoken, but my paperwork is.
[58:26.820 --> 58:28.820]  And I don't want to...
[58:28.820 --> 58:30.820]  Now what I'm doing with this cop should be easy.
[58:30.820 --> 58:36.820]  I figured my next one, I'll take it out on the real dude that the guy that directed him to arrest.
[58:36.820 --> 58:41.820]  And I also have him on video too, searching my van and calling back to the captain on...
[58:41.820 --> 58:43.820]  First he shuts my recorder off on the dash.
[58:43.820 --> 58:46.820]  Okay, well hang on, I got a break coming up, Scott.
[58:46.820 --> 58:48.820]  All right folks, y'all hold on, we'll be right back.
[58:48.820 --> 58:52.820]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:52.820 --> 58:57.820]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.820 --> 59:01.820]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:01.820 --> 59:06.820]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.820 --> 59:08.820]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.820 --> 59:12.820]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:12.820 --> 59:17.820]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.820 --> 59:21.820]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:21.820 --> 59:27.820]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.820 --> 59:32.820]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.820 --> 59:43.820]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.820 --> 59:47.820]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.820 --> 59:50.820]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.820 --> 59:53.820]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[59:53.820 --> 59:59.820]  LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[59:59.820 --> 01:00:04.820]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:04.820 --> 01:00:07.820]  Markets for Friday, the 2nd of June, 2017,
[01:00:07.820 --> 01:00:11.820]  closed off with gold at $1,278.45 an ounce,
[01:00:11.820 --> 01:00:14.820]  silver $17.51 an ounce,
[01:00:14.820 --> 01:00:17.820]  Texas crude $48.36 a barrel,
[01:00:17.820 --> 01:00:24.820]  and Bitcoin is still going up sitting at about $2,472 US currency.
[01:00:24.820 --> 01:00:27.820]  Today in history, the year 1953,
[01:00:27.820 --> 01:00:30.820]  the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II,
[01:00:30.820 --> 01:00:33.820]  crowned Queen of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand,
[01:00:33.820 --> 01:00:37.820]  and her other realms and territories and head of the Commonwealth,
[01:00:37.820 --> 01:00:41.820]  marks one of the first major international events to be televised.
[01:00:41.820 --> 01:00:46.820]  Today in history.
[01:00:46.820 --> 01:00:49.820]  In recent news, President Donald Trump announced the US would withdraw
[01:00:49.820 --> 01:00:54.820]  from the UN Paris Accord on climate change this last Thursday, yesterday,
[01:00:54.820 --> 01:00:55.820]  stating that, quote,
[01:00:55.820 --> 01:00:57.820]  the US will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord
[01:00:57.820 --> 01:01:01.820]  but begin negotiations to reenter either the Paris Accord
[01:01:01.820 --> 01:01:06.820]  or a really entirely new transaction on terms that are fair to the United States,
[01:01:06.820 --> 01:01:10.820]  its businesses, its workers, its people, its taxpayers.
[01:01:10.820 --> 01:01:12.820]  This, as could be predictably expected,
[01:01:12.820 --> 01:01:15.820]  had G7, formerly G8, leaders in a frenzy,
[01:01:15.820 --> 01:01:19.820]  notably Chinese dictatorship admiring Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau,
[01:01:19.820 --> 01:01:21.820]  who in a statement said that, quote,
[01:01:21.820 --> 01:01:24.820]  we are deeply disappointed that the United States federal government
[01:01:24.820 --> 01:01:26.820]  has decided to withdraw from the Paris Agreement,
[01:01:26.820 --> 01:01:30.820]  or French Socialist President Emmanuel Macron saying that it's, quote,
[01:01:30.820 --> 01:01:34.820]  a mistake for our planet, wherever we live, whoever we are,
[01:01:34.820 --> 01:01:37.820]  we all share the same responsibility to make our planet great again,
[01:01:37.820 --> 01:01:40.820]  along with UK Prime Minister Theresa May,
[01:01:40.820 --> 01:01:42.820]  German Chancellor Angela Merkel,
[01:01:42.820 --> 01:01:44.820]  and Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni,
[01:01:44.820 --> 01:01:46.820]  all stating disapproval as well.
[01:01:46.820 --> 01:01:48.820]  Even Russia, 8th in the former G8,
[01:01:48.820 --> 01:01:50.820]  stated the great significance it saw in the Paris Agreement
[01:01:50.820 --> 01:01:53.820]  hours before Trump made his announcement,
[01:01:53.820 --> 01:01:56.820]  not to mention a Vatican spokesman from the Holy See
[01:01:56.820 --> 01:01:59.820]  expressed the pontiff's dismay at President Trump's decision.
[01:01:59.820 --> 01:02:01.820]  Unfortunately, world leaders and media pundits
[01:02:01.820 --> 01:02:04.820]  failed to ask the opinions of another more important base,
[01:02:04.820 --> 01:02:06.820]  the American taxpayer,
[01:02:06.820 --> 01:02:09.820]  because they were never consulted via referendum or congressional vote
[01:02:09.820 --> 01:02:12.820]  when President Obama decided to unilaterally sign up the US
[01:02:12.820 --> 01:02:16.820]  to an agreement that would have major effects on industry in the United States.
[01:02:16.820 --> 01:02:19.820]  Or maybe they should have asked major climate change proponent,
[01:02:19.820 --> 01:02:23.820]  American adjunct professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
[01:02:23.820 --> 01:02:25.820]  at Columbia University, James Hansen,
[01:02:25.820 --> 01:02:27.820]  what he thought of the agreement,
[01:02:27.820 --> 01:02:30.820]  which he actually called a fraud, really, a fake,
[01:02:30.820 --> 01:02:32.820]  it's just worthless words,
[01:02:32.820 --> 01:02:35.820]  mostly because there was no solution to CO2 emissions
[01:02:35.820 --> 01:02:37.820]  other than charging more for energy,
[01:02:37.820 --> 01:02:40.820]  which would only disproportionately hurt the most vulnerable.
[01:02:40.820 --> 01:02:44.820]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors.
[01:02:44.820 --> 01:02:47.820]  If you have a product or a service that you'd like to advertise with us,
[01:02:47.820 --> 01:02:52.820]  feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257.
[01:02:52.820 --> 01:02:57.820]  This was Rick Rodey with your Lowdown for June 2, 2017.
[01:02:57.820 --> 01:03:08.820]  🎵Music🎵
[01:03:27.820 --> 01:03:37.820]  🎵Music🎵
[01:03:37.820 --> 01:03:39.820]  Alright, folks, we are back.
[01:03:39.820 --> 01:03:41.820]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:41.820 --> 01:03:45.820]  We are live tonight despite the weather and the technical difficulties.
[01:03:45.820 --> 01:03:49.820]  That being said, let's get back to being live with Scott here.
[01:03:49.820 --> 01:03:53.820]  Alright, Scott, let's see if we can't get this wrapped up good, bad, or ugly,
[01:03:53.820 --> 01:03:55.820]  because I've got other people in line.
[01:03:55.820 --> 01:03:57.820]  Yes, okay, I'll try and make this quick.
[01:03:57.820 --> 01:04:01.820]  So the deal is they declared me, they made a legal determination
[01:04:01.820 --> 01:04:03.820]  that I'm a sovereign citizen.
[01:04:03.820 --> 01:04:04.820]  Who did?
[01:04:04.820 --> 01:04:06.820]  Who made a legal determination?
[01:04:06.820 --> 01:04:10.820]  Everybody, absolutely everybody, the desk sergeant,
[01:04:10.820 --> 01:04:13.820]  the guy in the truck that he didn't realize there was a video camera
[01:04:13.820 --> 01:04:17.820]  taping him, and even called back on the radio to the desk officer,
[01:04:17.820 --> 01:04:20.820]  I've got your sovereign citizen coming back to you.
[01:04:20.820 --> 01:04:23.820]  This is the second arrest, so they declared me that.
[01:04:23.820 --> 01:04:25.820]  Everybody except the kid I'm suing.
[01:04:25.820 --> 01:04:29.820]  He actually asked me at the stop if I was.
[01:04:29.820 --> 01:04:31.820]  Asking is okay.
[01:04:31.820 --> 01:04:33.820]  Every other one of them, they made a decision.
[01:04:33.820 --> 01:04:35.820]  Let me ask you this question, Scott.
[01:04:35.820 --> 01:04:41.820]  Did the court or the opposing counsel in the case that you filed,
[01:04:41.820 --> 01:04:45.820]  or in the criminal case against you, I'm assuming that's what it was,
[01:04:45.820 --> 01:04:53.820]  did any of those people label you as such in any other proceedings
[01:04:53.820 --> 01:04:56.820]  as they progressed?
[01:04:56.820 --> 01:05:02.820]  No, but the public defender did mention that some of my speaking sounded like them,
[01:05:02.820 --> 01:05:08.820]  but I made absolute clarification that I'm not into the vapor money fear,
[01:05:08.820 --> 01:05:10.820]  I'm not a redemptive redemptionist.
[01:05:10.820 --> 01:05:14.820]  Then what everybody else said outside of that venue is their opinion
[01:05:14.820 --> 01:05:20.820]  and doesn't mean doodly squat unless they communicated it to the court
[01:05:20.820 --> 01:05:27.820]  and the court used that to disparage your rights or your claims in some manner.
[01:05:27.820 --> 01:05:29.820]  Well, yeah, they impounded the vehicle.
[01:05:29.820 --> 01:05:32.820]  The court didn't impound the vehicle.
[01:05:32.820 --> 01:05:35.820]  Well, then who do I go after, the court or the cops?
[01:05:35.820 --> 01:05:38.820]  You can't go after the court, Scott.
[01:05:38.820 --> 01:05:41.820]  You can't go after the court.
[01:05:41.820 --> 01:05:44.820]  Hey, Scott, Scott.
[01:05:44.820 --> 01:05:45.820]  Yeah?
[01:05:45.820 --> 01:05:49.820]  Why are you even asking that question?
[01:05:49.820 --> 01:05:52.820]  Because I thought I had to go after the cops who took my property
[01:05:52.820 --> 01:05:54.820]  and then after that I was going to go after...
[01:05:54.820 --> 01:05:59.820]  What did I say to make you think that I had somehow told you to do different?
[01:05:59.820 --> 01:06:01.820]  Oh, so that I'm on the right track.
[01:06:01.820 --> 01:06:04.820]  As far as the taking of your property, yes.
[01:06:04.820 --> 01:06:10.820]  As far as your rights being violated by being called a sovereign citizen, no.
[01:06:10.820 --> 01:06:15.820]  That's just an idiot's opinion stated by an idiot.
[01:06:15.820 --> 01:06:22.820]  But if the courts, if the courts or the counsel in the courts,
[01:06:22.820 --> 01:06:28.820]  if the court or the counsel in the court tried to use that to disparage you
[01:06:28.820 --> 01:06:32.820]  in the eyes of the court or in your cause,
[01:06:32.820 --> 01:06:36.820]  then you would have a claim of not getting due process
[01:06:36.820 --> 01:06:39.820]  of prejudicial treatment by the court.
[01:06:39.820 --> 01:06:43.820]  If that did not happen, then you don't have anything to do with that
[01:06:43.820 --> 01:06:45.820]  as far as appealing your case.
[01:06:45.820 --> 01:06:48.820]  But you can't sue the court even if they did that
[01:06:48.820 --> 01:06:51.820]  unless you could first prove the court was acting without jurisdiction
[01:06:51.820 --> 01:06:53.820]  in the first place, which would be hard to do
[01:06:53.820 --> 01:06:59.820]  considering you'd never raised a jurisdictional issue, I'm thinking.
[01:06:59.820 --> 01:07:00.820]  No.
[01:07:00.820 --> 01:07:03.820]  Well, I did in the beginning with them when I took the public defender.
[01:07:03.820 --> 01:07:05.820]  They had jurisdiction.
[01:07:05.820 --> 01:07:09.820]  Okay, not true, but beside the point.
[01:07:09.820 --> 01:07:11.820]  Anyway, we were going to wrap this up.
[01:07:11.820 --> 01:07:15.820]  What is your point that will allow us to do that?
[01:07:15.820 --> 01:07:18.820]  Well, what should I focus on now that they dismissed them clearly?
[01:07:18.820 --> 01:07:20.820]  They owe me something.
[01:07:20.820 --> 01:07:23.820]  Well, there is no clearly they owe you something.
[01:07:23.820 --> 01:07:26.820]  What I said before still goes.
[01:07:26.820 --> 01:07:31.820]  Either you have a cause of action you can sue for or you don't.
[01:07:31.820 --> 01:07:34.820]  If you don't know what a cause of action is,
[01:07:34.820 --> 01:07:37.820]  then we're not going to make much out of this conversation.
[01:07:37.820 --> 01:07:41.820]  Well, what I was going after was some sort of key because my property is...
[01:07:41.820 --> 01:07:44.820]  I don't care what you're going after.
[01:07:44.820 --> 01:07:47.820]  What matters is whether or not you have any legal standing
[01:07:47.820 --> 01:07:50.820]  to get anything in the first place.
[01:07:50.820 --> 01:07:53.820]  And it may not be what you're wanting to go after
[01:07:53.820 --> 01:07:55.820]  that would allow you to collect.
[01:07:55.820 --> 01:07:57.820]  It may be something else.
[01:07:57.820 --> 01:08:01.820]  But what I'm hearing is, is you don't know what that would be.
[01:08:01.820 --> 01:08:03.820]  You don't know how to figure out what that would be.
[01:08:03.820 --> 01:08:06.820]  You're just throwing darts at the wall blindfolded
[01:08:06.820 --> 01:08:09.820]  and hoping you're hitting the dartboard.
[01:08:09.820 --> 01:08:11.820]  Does that sound about right?
[01:08:11.820 --> 01:08:13.820]  I don't like that analogy. No, I don't like that.
[01:08:13.820 --> 01:08:16.820]  Well, you may not like it, but that's a description of what I'm getting here
[01:08:16.820 --> 01:08:18.820]  from what you're doing.
[01:08:18.820 --> 01:08:22.820]  If you do not know what your causes of action against the cop are,
[01:08:22.820 --> 01:08:27.820]  how are you going to write them down and file them in the court?
[01:08:27.820 --> 01:08:31.820]  How are you going to demand discovery and get the evidence you need
[01:08:31.820 --> 01:08:36.820]  to prove the elements of those claims in that court?
[01:08:36.820 --> 01:08:38.820]  Which court are you talking?
[01:08:38.820 --> 01:08:41.820]  Whatever court you're going to sue him in.
[01:08:41.820 --> 01:08:45.820]  Well, I'm suing them in the small claims, but what they had me in was criminal.
[01:08:45.820 --> 01:08:47.820]  Anyway, it is kind of complex.
[01:08:47.820 --> 01:08:50.820]  No, it's not complex. You're mixing your two cases,
[01:08:50.820 --> 01:08:54.820]  the cases against you by them and your case against them by you.
[01:08:54.820 --> 01:08:56.820]  They're not the same case.
[01:08:56.820 --> 01:08:57.820]  I agree, yes.
[01:08:57.820 --> 01:09:02.820]  I'm talking about the one you're trying to file against them in small claims.
[01:09:02.820 --> 01:09:07.820]  Even in small claims court, you have to have standing to make a claim
[01:09:07.820 --> 01:09:11.820]  and you have to have a valid claim in which to get relief.
[01:09:11.820 --> 01:09:16.820]  If you don't have that, you're not getting anywhere.
[01:09:16.820 --> 01:09:20.820]  Well, my claim is they're involved in this corruption.
[01:09:20.820 --> 01:09:26.820]  You cannot show the corruption harms you by its very existence.
[01:09:26.820 --> 01:09:30.820]  You can only sue for an injury that you have suffered.
[01:09:30.820 --> 01:09:32.820]  Are we clear on this point?
[01:09:32.820 --> 01:09:37.820]  I have not only suffered, I'm still suffering and I can prove that, absolutely.
[01:09:37.820 --> 01:09:41.820]  Right now, the only injury that you've informed me anything about
[01:09:41.820 --> 01:09:45.820]  on which you might possibly have a claim is the fact that they took your property
[01:09:45.820 --> 01:09:51.820]  without cause and the loss of that property caused you to lose the jobs you had.
[01:09:51.820 --> 01:09:54.820]  Now, either there is a cause of action for that that you can sue for
[01:09:54.820 --> 01:09:58.820]  in small claims court or some other court in New York
[01:09:58.820 --> 01:10:02.820]  and you know how to write the complaint sufficiently to make those allegations,
[01:10:02.820 --> 01:10:07.820]  cite those specific elements, and bring forth the evidence to prove them in your favor,
[01:10:07.820 --> 01:10:09.820]  or you don't.
[01:10:09.820 --> 01:10:12.820]  If you don't, you're throwing darts at the wall.
[01:10:12.820 --> 01:10:19.820]  If you do, then you should have already known how to do all this before you started it.
[01:10:19.820 --> 01:10:24.820]  Okay, well, not so easily. Okay, well, there you go. You just answered what I needed,
[01:10:24.820 --> 01:10:27.820]  a simple plan to focus things.
[01:10:27.820 --> 01:10:33.820]  I work at a very slow pace, but I'm not throwing no darts at the wall. You'll see.
[01:10:33.820 --> 01:10:36.820]  Okay. Well, thanks for calling in.
[01:10:36.820 --> 01:10:37.820]  Thank you so much.
[01:10:37.820 --> 01:10:38.820]  You're welcome.
[01:10:38.820 --> 01:10:39.820]  Enjoy that weather there.
[01:10:39.820 --> 01:10:42.820]  Yeah, thanks. Bye.
[01:10:42.820 --> 01:10:44.820]  Well, that was an event.
[01:10:44.820 --> 01:10:47.820]  All right, now we've got Robert in Texas.
[01:10:47.820 --> 01:10:50.820]  Robert, what can we do for you?
[01:10:50.820 --> 01:10:55.820]  All right. Short and sweet, I'm down the road from here in New Brunswick,
[01:10:55.820 --> 01:11:01.820]  and I went to court several times just basically as a cop watch,
[01:11:01.820 --> 01:11:04.820]  and our court watch, I should say,
[01:11:04.820 --> 01:11:11.820]  and what they're doing is it appears they're calling people in for a pretrial hearing.
[01:11:11.820 --> 01:11:15.820]  The judge never shows up, claims to be sick.
[01:11:15.820 --> 01:11:19.820]  This is so that you can conference with the prosecutor, correct?
[01:11:19.820 --> 01:11:20.820]  Yeah.
[01:11:20.820 --> 01:11:21.820]  Yeah.
[01:11:21.820 --> 01:11:26.820]  So they're using the jeopardy of a court pretrial hearing that's required by law,
[01:11:26.820 --> 01:11:29.820]  or can be, you know, the authority of law,
[01:11:29.820 --> 01:11:33.820]  and then when you get there, there's no judge, so they can have no hearing.
[01:11:33.820 --> 01:11:37.820]  Right, and see, the problem is the Code of Criminal Procedure says
[01:11:37.820 --> 01:11:43.820]  there's only very specific ways that a court can call you to appear before it.
[01:11:43.820 --> 01:11:51.820]  Warrant, subpoena, or complaint with a, I'm sorry, summons or subpoena.
[01:11:51.820 --> 01:11:58.820]  Those are the only legally valid ways and only the things associated with those things
[01:11:58.820 --> 01:12:01.820]  that the court has any lawful authority to call you to appear.
[01:12:01.820 --> 01:12:06.820]  They have no authority to make you appear to have a conference with the prosecutor.
[01:12:06.820 --> 01:12:12.820]  That right there is the court acting prejudicially in favor of the prosecution
[01:12:12.820 --> 01:12:17.820]  by facilitating meetings between the prosecutor and the defendant
[01:12:17.820 --> 01:12:21.820]  so that they can cut work, cut up a deal where the court doesn't have to do its job,
[01:12:21.820 --> 01:12:24.820]  but still gets a share of the money.
[01:12:24.820 --> 01:12:25.820]  Right.
[01:12:25.820 --> 01:12:26.820]  Okay?
[01:12:26.820 --> 01:12:35.820]  There's no question that this little practice that they're engaging in is absolutely illegal.
[01:12:35.820 --> 01:12:44.820]  Well, I tried to go to the sheriff's department and just file a complaint against the city attorney,
[01:12:44.820 --> 01:12:51.820]  a prosecuting attorney, for holding court without authority,
[01:12:51.820 --> 01:12:56.820]  and of course it took an hour and a half to convince them somebody to take my complaint.
[01:12:56.820 --> 01:13:01.820]  When they finally took the complaint, it was only a witness statement,
[01:13:01.820 --> 01:13:04.820]  and needless to say, I haven't heard back from them since then.
[01:13:04.820 --> 01:13:07.820]  Now this is the municipal court we're talking about?
[01:13:07.820 --> 01:13:10.820]  Yeah, it's about the municipal court.
[01:13:10.820 --> 01:13:12.820]  And a city attorney, right?
[01:13:12.820 --> 01:13:16.820]  Right, and I went to the sheriff's department to make the complaint.
[01:13:16.820 --> 01:13:20.820]  Well, you know that you can actually sue that city attorney, right?
[01:13:20.820 --> 01:13:22.820]  Right.
[01:13:22.820 --> 01:13:25.820]  Because here is the reason why.
[01:13:25.820 --> 01:13:30.820]  The Code of Criminal Procedure, unconstitutionally in 45.201,
[01:13:30.820 --> 01:13:36.820]  attempts to authorize municipal attorneys to act as state prosecutors.
[01:13:36.820 --> 01:13:40.820]  There is absolutely no constitutional authority for that.
[01:13:40.820 --> 01:13:46.820]  The delegated power to prosecute in the name of the state is given only to two elected officials,
[01:13:46.820 --> 01:13:48.820]  the county or district attorney.
[01:13:48.820 --> 01:13:53.820]  The city attorney is not a member of either of those offices.
[01:13:53.820 --> 01:13:57.820]  He is not a member of the team of either of those offices.
[01:13:57.820 --> 01:14:02.820]  That is especially true when the city attorney is actually a private law firm.
[01:14:02.820 --> 01:14:06.820]  The city attorney is unelected in all instances.
[01:14:06.820 --> 01:14:12.820]  They are appointed by someone within the city or hired by someone within the city.
[01:14:12.820 --> 01:14:16.820]  In other words, they have zero public accountability.
[01:14:16.820 --> 01:14:20.820]  But since they cannot lawfully act in the name of the state,
[01:14:20.820 --> 01:14:25.820]  they cannot have state immunity for their actions
[01:14:25.820 --> 01:14:30.820]  when those actions are unconstitutional and illegal.
[01:14:30.820 --> 01:14:33.820]  Sounds good.
[01:14:33.820 --> 01:14:39.820]  The legislature, through the statute, cannot delegate a constitutionally delegated power
[01:14:39.820 --> 01:14:44.820]  to an unaccountable office that has no public accountability
[01:14:44.820 --> 01:14:47.820]  and is not authorized to exercise that power.
[01:14:47.820 --> 01:14:53.820]  And everything to do with a municipal court is with no elected official in most cities.
[01:14:53.820 --> 01:14:55.820]  That's absolutely right.
[01:14:55.820 --> 01:14:58.820]  The very fact that the judge in a municipal court is appointed and not elected
[01:14:58.820 --> 01:15:03.820]  is just one more argument about why municipal courts do not have valid lawful authority
[01:15:03.820 --> 01:15:07.820]  over the people of Texas or any other state.
[01:15:07.820 --> 01:15:09.820]  Yeah.
[01:15:09.820 --> 01:15:15.820]  If I filed a criminal charge against me, what would you suggest that I try to label it as?
[01:15:15.820 --> 01:15:17.820]  Well, here's what I would do.
[01:15:17.820 --> 01:15:21.820]  Impersonating a judicial officer is what I'd do.
[01:15:21.820 --> 01:15:22.820]  Okay.
[01:15:22.820 --> 01:15:25.820]  Let's see.
[01:15:25.820 --> 01:15:30.820]  Unlawful impersonating a public servant is another
[01:15:30.820 --> 01:15:36.820]  because a city attorney, by definition, cannot sit as a prosecutor in the name of the state.
[01:15:36.820 --> 01:15:38.820]  Cannot do it.
[01:15:38.820 --> 01:15:42.820]  The statute cannot authorize them to do it
[01:15:42.820 --> 01:15:50.820]  because that is a constitutionally delegated power.
[01:15:50.820 --> 01:15:53.820]  So you can file impersonation of a public servant,
[01:15:53.820 --> 01:15:56.820]  impersonation of a judicial officer.
[01:15:56.820 --> 01:15:58.820]  Both of those would fly.
[01:15:58.820 --> 01:16:00.820]  Okay.
[01:16:00.820 --> 01:16:06.820]  You can also file, since they are actually public servants,
[01:16:06.820 --> 01:16:12.820]  as acting on behalf of a governmental entity, the city,
[01:16:12.820 --> 01:16:17.820]  you should be able to also charge them with official oppression and abuse of official capacity.
[01:16:17.820 --> 01:16:21.820]  Now watch. This is how I guarantee you this would play out.
[01:16:21.820 --> 01:16:27.820]  If you actually tried to charge a city attorney who was a hired gun attorney, especially,
[01:16:27.820 --> 01:16:31.820]  with official oppression and abuse of official capacity,
[01:16:31.820 --> 01:16:38.820]  they would come to their defense screaming that they are not public servants subject to those charges.
[01:16:38.820 --> 01:16:43.820]  Which means they just shot the prosecutorial power they've been claiming that they had
[01:16:43.820 --> 01:16:47.820]  right between the eyes and threw them under the bus anyway.
[01:16:47.820 --> 01:16:51.820]  Hang on just a second, Robert, and we'll finish this up on the other side, okay?
[01:16:51.820 --> 01:17:16.820]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang in there.
[01:17:21.820 --> 01:17:26.820]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[01:17:26.820 --> 01:17:28.820]  You can order them your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:28.820 --> 01:17:30.820]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:30.820 --> 01:17:33.820]  Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:17:33.820 --> 01:17:36.820]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:17:36.820 --> 01:17:42.820]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:42.820 --> 01:17:43.820]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:43.820 --> 01:17:44.820]  No.
[01:17:44.820 --> 01:17:46.820]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:46.820 --> 01:17:47.820]  No.
[01:17:47.820 --> 01:17:48.820]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:17:48.820 --> 01:17:49.820]  No.
[01:17:49.820 --> 01:17:50.820]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:50.820 --> 01:17:53.820]  Oh, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:17:53.820 --> 01:17:54.820]  This is perfect.
[01:17:54.820 --> 01:17:56.820]  Thank you so much.
[01:17:56.820 --> 01:17:57.820]  You're welcome.
[01:17:57.820 --> 01:18:26.820]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:26.820 --> 01:18:28.820]  Thank you.
[01:18:56.820 --> 01:18:59.060]  on for details and donate today.
[01:19:02.060 --> 01:19:07.020]  This is the Logos radio network.
[01:19:22.940 --> 01:19:25.700]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
[01:19:25.700 --> 01:19:29.060]  I take a look at my life and realize there's nothing left.
[01:19:29.060 --> 01:19:32.180]  Cuz I've been blastin' and laughin' so long that
[01:19:32.180 --> 01:19:34.740]  even my mama thinks that my mind is gone.
[01:19:34.740 --> 01:19:37.860]  But I ain't never crossed a man that didn't deserve it.
[01:19:37.860 --> 01:19:41.140]  He be treated like a punk, you know that's unheard of.
[01:19:41.140 --> 01:19:44.100]  You better watch how you're talkin' and where you're walkin'.
[01:19:44.100 --> 01:19:47.060]  Or you and your homies might be lyin' in chalk.
[01:19:47.060 --> 01:19:49.860]  I really hate to trip, but I gotta loc.
[01:19:49.860 --> 01:19:53.300]  As they cope, I see myself in the pistol smoke, fool.
[01:19:53.300 --> 01:19:55.780]  I'm the kind of G that let her homies wanna beat.
[01:19:55.780 --> 01:19:57.480]  Like on my knees in the night,altar p UK.
[01:19:57.500 --> 01:19:59.860]  Sayin prayers in the street life.
[01:19:59.860 --> 01:20:05.780]  Been spending most of life, living in the deathless paradise.
[01:20:05.780 --> 01:20:11.700]  Been spending most of life, living in the deathless paradise.
[01:20:11.700 --> 01:20:17.220]  Keep spending most of life, living in the deathless paradise.
[01:20:17.220 --> 01:20:27.580]  Look at the situation, they got me facing, I can't live a normal life.
[01:20:27.580 --> 01:20:31.780]  I was raised by the sky, so I gotta be damn with the hoodie.
[01:20:31.780 --> 01:20:34.740]  All right, folks, we are back again.
[01:20:34.740 --> 01:20:38.220]  We have three segments remaining in this show.
[01:20:38.220 --> 01:20:39.820]  Let's see if we can't make the most of them.
[01:20:39.820 --> 01:20:41.420]  All right, let's get back to Robert here.
[01:20:41.420 --> 01:20:42.940]  All right, Robert.
[01:20:42.940 --> 01:20:49.420]  Well, we're back in here in the San, you said New Braunfels, municipal court, municipal
[01:20:49.420 --> 01:20:54.260]  attorney, and the issue that you're having with them specifically, other than them calling
[01:20:54.260 --> 01:20:58.180]  you into court to have a meeting with the prosecutor, which they're not allowed to do
[01:20:58.180 --> 01:21:02.420]  by law, what else is going on with them of anything?
[01:21:02.420 --> 01:21:05.540]  Yeah, I don't actually have a case before them.
[01:21:05.540 --> 01:21:09.700]  I was just there as a court, well, to observe the court.
[01:21:09.700 --> 01:21:15.260]  And I have been following up on this for the past six months since you've been talking
[01:21:15.260 --> 01:21:16.260]  about it.
[01:21:16.260 --> 01:21:21.020]  And you're right, everything they're doing is in violation of the law, it's skirting
[01:21:21.020 --> 01:21:27.500]  the law, they're bringing them in and making them subject to the law, and then the judge
[01:21:27.500 --> 01:21:28.740]  never shows up.
[01:21:28.740 --> 01:21:33.300]  And it's just downright insanity.
[01:21:33.300 --> 01:21:37.420]  And I mainly just want to get this before a county judge.
[01:21:37.420 --> 01:21:41.700]  Yeah, and the biggest thing is, is they never hold a probable cause hearing like they're
[01:21:41.700 --> 01:21:43.320]  supposed to do.
[01:21:43.320 --> 01:21:47.060]  They keep trying to say that examining trials are for felonies only, but that's not what
[01:21:47.060 --> 01:21:49.980]  the statute says, nor is it what the case law says.
[01:21:49.980 --> 01:21:56.660]  The actual case law says the examining trial is a requirement, even in a misdemeanor, and
[01:21:56.660 --> 01:22:04.860]  that the examining trial probable cause cannot be determined by the complaint on its face.
[01:22:04.860 --> 01:22:11.120]  If the complaint was the only thing necessary to establish probable cause, then no challenge
[01:22:11.120 --> 01:22:14.740]  to what a cop says could ever fly.
[01:22:14.740 --> 01:22:19.860]  There would be no requirement for a magistrate to make a probable cause finding if the complainant
[01:22:19.860 --> 01:22:23.060]  alone could make it just by making the complaint.
[01:22:23.060 --> 01:22:27.140]  I made a complaint, therefore probable cause is established, baloney.
[01:22:27.140 --> 01:22:28.540]  Yeah, right.
[01:22:28.540 --> 01:22:34.740]  Well, the other thing they're doing is they're prosecuting directly off the citation.
[01:22:34.740 --> 01:22:38.100]  They're not getting the signed agreement for...
[01:22:38.100 --> 01:22:40.700]  Which is also illegal.
[01:22:40.700 --> 01:22:42.860]  Which is illegal entirely.
[01:22:42.860 --> 01:22:50.380]  And from what I understand, this is going on in several, you know, just about every
[01:22:50.380 --> 01:22:53.460]  municipal court in the damn state, excuse me.
[01:22:53.460 --> 01:22:56.860]  So I'm trying to fight this, you know, trying to get it started here so I know what to do
[01:22:56.860 --> 01:22:57.860]  at the next town.
[01:22:57.860 --> 01:22:58.860]  Yeah.
[01:22:58.860 --> 01:23:00.340]  Well, that's the beauty of the seminar material.
[01:23:00.340 --> 01:23:03.680]  All the things you're raising, I've already raised numerous times.
[01:23:03.680 --> 01:23:10.220]  I've got every legal pleading you can imagine on everything they do wrong and then some.
[01:23:10.220 --> 01:23:15.060]  And the more time I spend on this fighting other issues and doing more case law research,
[01:23:15.060 --> 01:23:19.300]  the more stuff I'm digging up that proves they're doing it even worse than even I thought.
[01:23:19.300 --> 01:23:21.340]  And I didn't think that was possible.
[01:23:21.340 --> 01:23:25.300]  You got 20, 20 billion.
[01:23:25.300 --> 01:23:26.300]  Yeah.
[01:23:26.300 --> 01:23:28.780]  Well, I wish that part was still true.
[01:23:28.780 --> 01:23:36.300]  But yeah, they are absolutely in no cognitive way complying with law.
[01:23:36.300 --> 01:23:40.780]  They are ignoring due process and violating rights at every single turn.
[01:23:40.780 --> 01:23:46.380]  If they manage to get one thing right, guaranteed the next three things will be completely wrong.
[01:23:46.380 --> 01:23:47.380]  Guaranteed.
[01:23:47.380 --> 01:23:55.580]  Well, the one action acting without a judicial authority is a class B felony in this state.
[01:23:55.580 --> 01:23:58.860]  And they did it 15 times per session.
[01:23:58.860 --> 01:23:59.860]  Yeah.
[01:23:59.860 --> 01:24:00.860]  Yeah.
[01:24:00.860 --> 01:24:05.060]  Well, the thing is, is now abuse or official oppression is now a third degree felony.
[01:24:05.060 --> 01:24:06.700]  Oh, okay.
[01:24:06.700 --> 01:24:10.540]  So I'm sorry.
[01:24:10.540 --> 01:24:12.860]  It's either a third or a state jail.
[01:24:12.860 --> 01:24:16.780]  I forget which one representative White was trying to get it turned into when they were
[01:24:16.780 --> 01:24:21.620]  going after those seven cops in Houston for jumping on that 15 year old kid in front of
[01:24:21.620 --> 01:24:26.820]  that storage area camera that caught on beating him after he had fell down face down on the
[01:24:26.820 --> 01:24:28.740]  ground at the spread eagle.
[01:24:28.740 --> 01:24:30.800]  They just jumped on him and pounded him.
[01:24:30.800 --> 01:24:34.340]  Seven cops on a 15 year old kid, okay?
[01:24:34.340 --> 01:24:37.180]  And they had no reason to be chasing him to begin with.
[01:24:37.180 --> 01:24:42.860]  The kid ran from a scene where a bunch of cops pulled up in a raid on a drug house.
[01:24:42.860 --> 01:24:47.520]  Now anybody that lives in a neighborhood where there's a drug house and knows that a cop
[01:24:47.520 --> 01:24:52.940]  raid is about to converge on the house or sees it happening, knows standing on a street
[01:24:52.940 --> 01:24:59.420]  corner where the bullets are going to be flying is not a smart thing to be doing.
[01:24:59.420 --> 01:25:04.900]  If this kid had a brain cell in his head, which obviously he did, he was out of there.
[01:25:04.900 --> 01:25:08.980]  There was no grounds for the cops to chase him and yet they did so.
[01:25:08.980 --> 01:25:14.180]  And then when they caught him, they did nothing but commit aggravated assault.
[01:25:14.180 --> 01:25:19.380]  And then the prosecuting attorney lied to the face of a state representative and told
[01:25:19.380 --> 01:25:25.820]  him that the only thing he could charge these cops with was official oppression under the
[01:25:25.820 --> 01:25:29.940]  statute, which then was only a class B misdemeanor.
[01:25:29.940 --> 01:25:35.820]  And that's an outright lie because the aggravated assault statute in Texas is written to be
[01:25:35.820 --> 01:25:39.620]  specifically directed at a public servant.
[01:25:39.620 --> 01:25:40.780]  Right.
[01:25:40.780 --> 01:25:47.740]  Well, between you and Randy, y'all have really brought me forward about 40 years.
[01:25:47.740 --> 01:25:51.260]  So it's starting to make sense what they're doing wrong.
[01:25:51.260 --> 01:25:55.740]  Oh, and believe me, you have not seen the worst of it.
[01:25:55.740 --> 01:25:59.800]  The more you go and watch what they do and the more you understand what the code of kernel
[01:25:59.800 --> 01:26:05.180]  procedure says and how it's supposed to work and how all the dots in it connect.
[01:26:05.180 --> 01:26:09.860]  Once you have that little constellation map in your head and you're as good with that
[01:26:09.860 --> 01:26:16.480]  as any astronomer is with the stars, believe me, it will become a much broader picture
[01:26:16.480 --> 01:26:22.580]  with much more evidentiary failings than you would even comprehend otherwise.
[01:26:22.580 --> 01:26:24.520]  Right.
[01:26:24.520 --> 01:26:30.740]  When I tell you these people are true criminals, you will never fully understand that until
[01:26:30.740 --> 01:26:34.980]  you understand these things so you can put it into proper perspective.
[01:26:34.980 --> 01:26:38.780]  But once you do, there ain't going to be any doubt about it.
[01:26:38.780 --> 01:26:39.780]  Exactly.
[01:26:39.780 --> 01:26:42.300]  Well, let's get on to the next one.
[01:26:42.300 --> 01:26:44.980]  I mean, I just can't tell you, appreciate you so much.
[01:26:44.980 --> 01:26:46.500]  Well, glad to be of help.
[01:26:46.500 --> 01:26:48.500]  That's what we're here to try to do.
[01:26:48.500 --> 01:26:49.500]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:26:49.500 --> 01:26:51.820]  Seminar is definitely helpful.
[01:26:51.820 --> 01:26:52.820]  You're welcome.
[01:26:52.820 --> 01:26:53.820]  All right.
[01:26:53.820 --> 01:26:55.820]  You have a good night.
[01:26:55.820 --> 01:26:57.500]  All right.
[01:26:57.500 --> 01:27:00.300]  Now we're going to go to Wendy in Colorado.
[01:27:00.300 --> 01:27:01.980]  Wendy, what can we do for you?
[01:27:01.980 --> 01:27:04.060]  I got about three minutes before the break.
[01:27:04.060 --> 01:27:07.540]  So hearing about two, I'm going to interrupt you.
[01:27:07.540 --> 01:27:08.540]  Okay.
[01:27:08.540 --> 01:27:13.620]  I received the email from Deborah and I sent it forward to you about your seminar.
[01:27:13.620 --> 01:27:14.620]  Okay.
[01:27:14.620 --> 01:27:15.620]  You had sent me in.
[01:27:15.620 --> 01:27:16.620]  Okay.
[01:27:16.620 --> 01:27:18.260]  So I just sent that to you.
[01:27:18.260 --> 01:27:24.900]  And also I was just wondering on my case here, I'm going to overlook your seminar and stuff,
[01:27:24.900 --> 01:27:30.820]  but I kind of think I could do exactly what you just told the last gentleman as far as
[01:27:30.820 --> 01:27:34.660]  what they told me over, but actually they didn't even put me over.
[01:27:34.660 --> 01:27:40.460]  Somebody got a call that said, they said to me, I was already out of my truck with my
[01:27:40.460 --> 01:27:47.780]  two dogs and they pulled up and said, hi, we just want to talk to you for a minute.
[01:27:47.780 --> 01:27:52.300]  Somebody called in and said, it's somebody that looks like you, matched your truck, was
[01:27:52.300 --> 01:27:58.700]  driving about a half mile away, maybe he was having a seizure or maybe you're drunk driving.
[01:27:58.700 --> 01:27:59.700]  And I said, no, I'm not.
[01:27:59.700 --> 01:28:03.900]  He says, I'm not going to give you a ticket, I'm just going to give you a warning.
[01:28:03.900 --> 01:28:05.940]  And I said, well, I'm just getting my dogs.
[01:28:05.940 --> 01:28:10.020]  They were blind, you know, and he got out of the house, so I was giving him my jump
[01:28:10.020 --> 01:28:11.020]  in the truck.
[01:28:11.020 --> 01:28:14.940]  He goes, well, put your dogs in the house and let me, can I see your driver's license?
[01:28:14.940 --> 01:28:15.940]  And I said, I don't have one.
[01:28:15.940 --> 01:28:18.740]  From then on it went downhill.
[01:28:18.740 --> 01:28:22.620]  They kept me there for probably about an hour and a half, four cops.
[01:28:22.620 --> 01:28:29.100]  One was training and he didn't, he said, he kept calling me a lighter saying, I know you
[01:28:29.100 --> 01:28:32.260]  were up there over there on 120th and blah, blah, blah.
[01:28:32.260 --> 01:28:33.260]  I said, I was not.
[01:28:33.260 --> 01:28:34.260]  I just came around the corner.
[01:28:34.260 --> 01:28:35.260]  You just see.
[01:28:35.260 --> 01:28:36.900]  Yeah, that's, that's the wrong answer.
[01:28:36.900 --> 01:28:40.520]  When he says something like that, it says, okay, you have that on video or you personally
[01:28:40.520 --> 01:28:41.520]  saw it.
[01:28:41.520 --> 01:28:42.520]  Which one?
[01:28:42.520 --> 01:28:43.520]  Okay.
[01:28:43.520 --> 01:28:44.880]  You say I was there.
[01:28:44.880 --> 01:28:48.580]  Do you have that on video or are you saying that you personally witnessed seeing me at
[01:28:48.580 --> 01:28:50.180]  that location?
[01:28:50.180 --> 01:28:54.180]  Are you the one that's going to be testifying in court that I was at that location and you
[01:28:54.180 --> 01:28:55.420]  personally saw me?
[01:28:55.420 --> 01:29:00.800]  Well, what they wrote me a ticket for was driving under revocation, which I've had.
[01:29:00.800 --> 01:29:03.300]  But again, they didn't see you in the truck, right?
[01:29:03.300 --> 01:29:04.300]  Yeah.
[01:29:04.300 --> 01:29:08.900]  You see me pulling up to the house at the truck, I guess, but he didn't see me a mile
[01:29:08.900 --> 01:29:14.580]  away at that place where somebody called in on me supposedly because I wasn't there.
[01:29:14.580 --> 01:29:15.580]  Okay.
[01:29:15.580 --> 01:29:17.380]  But he saw you in a truck that was moving.
[01:29:17.380 --> 01:29:18.380]  Yeah.
[01:29:18.380 --> 01:29:19.380]  Right.
[01:29:19.380 --> 01:29:22.020]  I pulled up there and he turned the house and then he turned around and didn't turn
[01:29:22.020 --> 01:29:23.020]  his lights on.
[01:29:23.020 --> 01:29:24.020]  Okay.
[01:29:24.020 --> 01:29:28.360]  Did you do any discovery or anything to get the CAD report and everything associated with
[01:29:28.360 --> 01:29:31.100]  that call he was claiming came in?
[01:29:31.100 --> 01:29:32.100]  I did all that.
[01:29:32.100 --> 01:29:33.100]  I sent in for it.
[01:29:33.100 --> 01:29:34.100]  I put a motion on that.
[01:29:34.100 --> 01:29:36.700]  That guy would tell me I had to go down and pick it up.
[01:29:36.700 --> 01:29:38.700]  So I have to go do that.
[01:29:38.700 --> 01:29:39.700]  Okay.
[01:29:39.700 --> 01:29:40.700]  Yeah.
[01:29:40.700 --> 01:29:47.420]  What you want is the 911 or whatever the dispatch call was that that caller allegedly called
[01:29:47.420 --> 01:29:48.420]  in with.
[01:29:48.420 --> 01:29:51.860]  You want that recording, the CAD report to the officers.
[01:29:51.860 --> 01:29:53.420]  You want to compare all that.
[01:29:53.420 --> 01:29:54.420]  Hang on just a second, Wendy.
[01:29:54.420 --> 01:29:55.980]  We'll be right back after this break.
[01:29:55.980 --> 01:29:57.620]  Folks, y'all hang on.
[01:29:57.620 --> 01:29:59.620]  We'll return just a moment.
[01:29:59.620 --> 01:30:03.260]  Are you too clean for your own good?
[01:30:03.260 --> 01:30:08.580]  According to new research, being too conscientious about dirt and germs could actually make you
[01:30:08.580 --> 01:30:09.580]  sick.
[01:30:09.580 --> 01:30:13.220]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with some antibacterial products you might
[01:30:13.220 --> 01:30:15.320]  want to avoid.
[01:30:15.320 --> 01:30:16.900]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:16.900 --> 01:30:20.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.500 --> 01:30:25.280]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.280 --> 01:30:26.740]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:26.740 --> 01:30:30.380]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.380 --> 01:30:33.060]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.060 --> 01:30:37.340]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:30:37.340 --> 01:30:40.880]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:40.880 --> 01:30:42.980]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:42.980 --> 01:30:49.340]  A University of Michigan study suggests that antibacterial soaps and hand sanitizers could
[01:30:49.340 --> 01:30:51.060]  make your family sick.
[01:30:51.060 --> 01:30:55.100]  Many contain the chemical triclosan and antimicrobial.
[01:30:55.100 --> 01:30:59.200]  Some people with higher levels of triclosan in their systems are more likely to be diagnosed
[01:30:59.200 --> 01:31:01.220]  with allergies and hay fever.
[01:31:01.220 --> 01:31:05.260]  Scientists believe the chemical may interfere with the body's immune system by mimicking
[01:31:05.260 --> 01:31:07.740]  or affecting human hormones.
[01:31:07.740 --> 01:31:11.300]  Triclosan may also prevent kids from dealing with everyday germs so they don't develop
[01:31:11.300 --> 01:31:12.820]  a natural immunity to them.
[01:31:12.820 --> 01:31:17.740]  So if you want a healthy clean, skip the antibacterial products and wash up with good old-fashioned
[01:31:17.740 --> 01:31:18.740]  soap and water.
[01:31:18.740 --> 01:31:20.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:20.700 --> 01:31:30.620]  Your news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.620 --> 01:31:35.980]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:35.980 --> 01:31:38.380]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.380 --> 01:31:43.040]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.040 --> 01:31:45.780]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.780 --> 01:31:48.500]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.500 --> 01:31:49.860]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.860 --> 01:31:50.860]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.860 --> 01:31:52.300]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.300 --> 01:31:53.300]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.300 --> 01:31:54.980]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.980 --> 01:31:57.580]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.580 --> 01:31:59.780]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:31:59.780 --> 01:32:03.180]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.180 --> 01:32:06.180]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.180 --> 01:32:09.820]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[01:32:09.820 --> 01:32:10.820]  them to pay for it.
[01:32:10.820 --> 01:32:14.380]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.380 --> 01:32:18.260]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.260 --> 01:32:21.020]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.020 --> 01:32:22.140]  And we accept bitcoin.
[01:32:22.140 --> 01:32:26.620]  As a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints, you
[01:32:26.620 --> 01:32:30.960]  can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:30.960 --> 01:32:32.020]  first time.
[01:32:32.020 --> 01:32:40.700]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to HillCountryHomeImprovements.com, mention the crypto show, and get $100 off.
[01:32:40.700 --> 01:32:45.300]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.300 --> 01:32:50.380]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knockin', your door should be lockin'.
[01:32:50.380 --> 01:32:56.340]  That's 512-992-8745 or HillCountryHomeImprovements.com.
[01:32:56.340 --> 01:32:58.700]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.700 --> 01:33:00.900]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:00.900 --> 01:33:30.180]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:30.900 --> 01:33:41.780]  All right, folks.
[01:33:41.780 --> 01:33:43.180]  We are back.
[01:33:43.180 --> 01:33:47.660]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are speaking with Wendy in Colorado.
[01:33:47.660 --> 01:33:51.980]  All right, Wendy, let's continue this on, please.
[01:33:51.980 --> 01:33:52.980]  Okay.
[01:33:52.980 --> 01:33:58.540]  So I did that, I put in, so I gotta go down there and look at their paperwork.
[01:33:58.540 --> 01:34:05.020]  Usually when I ask for that stuff, they have half of it blacked out where I can't see anything.
[01:34:05.020 --> 01:34:09.380]  Well, for the purpose of discovery, you can demand that they are unredacted.
[01:34:09.380 --> 01:34:13.260]  Okay, unredacted, okay.
[01:34:13.260 --> 01:34:14.740]  Okay.
[01:34:14.740 --> 01:34:18.940]  And I would definitely file it as a motion for discovery, not just a public information
[01:34:18.940 --> 01:34:21.740]  request or whatever it is Colorado has.
[01:34:21.740 --> 01:34:23.500]  I would do both.
[01:34:23.500 --> 01:34:25.500]  That's my preference.
[01:34:25.500 --> 01:34:28.380]  All righty.
[01:34:28.380 --> 01:34:35.500]  So they wrote me a ticket for, actually the cop that pulled me over didn't write it.
[01:34:35.500 --> 01:34:40.900]  He had the trainee that was, I guess it was first day write it, and the other officer
[01:34:40.900 --> 01:34:46.100]  that was there, honestly it was about an hour that they had me there, because the cop, the
[01:34:46.100 --> 01:34:51.700]  trainee kept messing up, and the main guy, he was there nine years, I just got all that
[01:34:51.700 --> 01:34:52.700]  for waiting.
[01:34:52.700 --> 01:34:56.540]  They wouldn't let me leave or nothing, but he kept saying to me, this cop, going, I'm
[01:34:56.540 --> 01:35:01.180]  going to take you to jail and tell this truck, if you don't tell me the truth, that you
[01:35:01.180 --> 01:35:04.980]  were up there, up that street, and I said, I wasn't, and he goes, okay, I'm going
[01:35:04.980 --> 01:35:10.620]  to call in and find out what you said, and I'm going to find out the caller, and if
[01:35:10.620 --> 01:35:15.180]  they said it was you, I'm taking you to jail and towing the truck, and I said, fine,
[01:35:15.180 --> 01:35:16.180]  do that.
[01:35:16.180 --> 01:35:17.180]  So they called in.
[01:35:17.180 --> 01:35:20.420]  About five minutes later, they came back and they said, we're writing the ticket for
[01:35:20.420 --> 01:35:21.420]  revocation.
[01:35:21.420 --> 01:35:28.020]  So no other, you know, no other ticket means of why they stopped me, and I wasn't even
[01:35:28.020 --> 01:35:34.460]  driving when it did come up, but it's, I don't know, I think that's just illegal,
[01:35:34.460 --> 01:35:35.460]  I don't know.
[01:35:35.460 --> 01:35:36.460]  I don't know.
[01:35:36.460 --> 01:35:41.460]  Well, the thing is, he didn't have any particular reason to ask you for your ID.
[01:35:41.460 --> 01:35:47.100]  I mean, Colorado, the last time, when I lived there, was not a stop and identify state.
[01:35:47.100 --> 01:35:51.060]  Has something changed recently?
[01:35:51.060 --> 01:35:52.060]  Not in the books.
[01:35:52.060 --> 01:35:55.260]  They say they can do an investigatory stop, and it's got to be-
[01:35:55.260 --> 01:36:02.380]  Yeah, but if you were already at your place, he can't do an investigatory stop.
[01:36:02.380 --> 01:36:07.020]  Not for something that happened outside of his line of sight or knowledge.
[01:36:07.020 --> 01:36:14.100]  And he wrote the ticket, he wrote the ticket on the address, it shows 120 at the place
[01:36:14.100 --> 01:36:17.620]  they originally said, it's not even at my house where I was at.
[01:36:17.620 --> 01:36:22.700]  They wrote the ticket like they found me at a, like it's about a quarter of a mile away,
[01:36:22.700 --> 01:36:24.620]  or even a mile.
[01:36:24.620 --> 01:36:33.020]  Yeah, well, you need to file a complaint with the prosecuting attorney that the officer
[01:36:33.020 --> 01:36:39.580]  falsified that information on the citation in an attempt to implicate you in a crime.
[01:36:39.580 --> 01:36:45.540]  They falsified a government document in a false attempt to implicate you in a crime.
[01:36:45.540 --> 01:36:47.740]  Okay, thank you.
[01:36:47.740 --> 01:36:48.740]  You're welcome.
[01:36:48.740 --> 01:36:49.740]  All right.
[01:36:49.740 --> 01:36:51.740]  Well, then I'll let you know how it goes.
[01:36:51.740 --> 01:36:59.940]  Oh, and I also sent you and Randy both an email about yesterday, about how President
[01:36:59.940 --> 01:37:10.220]  Trump has this fight that he did a task force, he initiated a task force to see what regulations
[01:37:10.220 --> 01:37:15.380]  that can be revoked, or if people have public comments that you can write in and tell them
[01:37:15.380 --> 01:37:21.580]  what regulations that they're doing illegally and everything for the people, it's for the
[01:37:21.580 --> 01:37:22.980]  public to do that.
[01:37:22.980 --> 01:37:26.140]  So you'll see it when I, when you look at the email.
[01:37:26.140 --> 01:37:27.140]  Okay.
[01:37:27.140 --> 01:37:28.140]  Okay.
[01:37:28.140 --> 01:37:29.140]  All right.
[01:37:29.140 --> 01:37:30.140]  Thank you.
[01:37:30.140 --> 01:37:31.140]  Thank you.
[01:37:31.140 --> 01:37:32.140]  Bye.
[01:37:32.140 --> 01:37:33.140]  Bye bye.
[01:37:33.140 --> 01:37:34.140]  All right.
[01:37:34.140 --> 01:37:35.700]  Somewhere, my caller page has disappeared.
[01:37:35.700 --> 01:37:36.700]  Hang on.
[01:37:36.700 --> 01:37:37.700]  There we are.
[01:37:37.700 --> 01:37:38.700]  All right.
[01:37:38.700 --> 01:37:41.980]  Now, next caller up is Lenny in Arizona.
[01:37:41.980 --> 01:37:44.100]  Lenny, what can we do for you?
[01:37:44.100 --> 01:37:49.180]  Hi Eddie, good to talk to you again.
[01:37:49.180 --> 01:37:54.820]  I have a, uh, my boss's husband's being kind of railroaded for a Trump driving ticket in
[01:37:54.820 --> 01:37:55.820]  Arizona.
[01:37:55.820 --> 01:38:02.020]  Uh, he's kind of gone with the flow when they tell him to sign something, he signed it.
[01:38:02.020 --> 01:38:08.180]  So he has signed away his rights to a preliminary hearing, but not a preliminary hearing, a
[01:38:08.180 --> 01:38:13.660]  determination hearing where they determine if there's probable cause probable hearing.
[01:38:13.660 --> 01:38:18.380]  Um, they've got him in something called an early disposition court.
[01:38:18.380 --> 01:38:19.380]  It's new on me.
[01:38:19.380 --> 01:38:25.660]  I can't find any mention of it in the, uh, the rules of civil procedure and the, uh,
[01:38:25.660 --> 01:38:29.120]  superior court won't answer questions about it and tell me what it is.
[01:38:29.120 --> 01:38:34.980]  I can find no nothing about it, but it appears to be where they are conducting the plea bargaining
[01:38:34.980 --> 01:38:37.060]  with him in that place.
[01:38:37.060 --> 01:38:41.500]  The early is, is he charged with a crime or a civil infraction?
[01:38:41.500 --> 01:38:47.820]  Well, initially he was pulled over for no tags, civil infraction, but found out he had
[01:38:47.820 --> 01:38:51.020]  a suspended license, civil infraction.
[01:38:51.020 --> 01:38:55.820]  Then they tried, they escalated it to a drug driving by making the accusation.
[01:38:55.820 --> 01:39:00.540]  And when he refused to blow into the breathalyzer, they arrested him, took him to jail, got a
[01:39:00.540 --> 01:39:02.740]  warrant for taking his blood.
[01:39:02.740 --> 01:39:08.580]  And now they are prosecuting for him for criminal DUI under the transportation code.
[01:39:08.580 --> 01:39:16.340]  What did his blood draw, say a very small percentage, uh, but wasn't an illegal percentage.
[01:39:16.340 --> 01:39:21.020]  No, but they're pursuing it anyway.
[01:39:21.020 --> 01:39:28.140]  Well, then this is, that's prosecutorial misconduct at the prosecutor knows he does not have the
[01:39:28.140 --> 01:39:32.080]  legal limit by which to convict on a DUI.
[01:39:32.080 --> 01:39:39.140]  It would, it's sheer idiocy for him to pursue this because all he is doing is setting up
[01:39:39.140 --> 01:39:46.020]  whoever he's representing, the city, the county, whatever, for a massive lawsuit.
[01:39:46.020 --> 01:39:48.720]  You can't sue the prosecutor.
[01:39:48.720 --> 01:39:52.780]  Even when they know they're doing it wrong, you can't sue the prosecutor, which is dead
[01:39:52.780 --> 01:39:55.340]  wrong in my book.
[01:39:55.340 --> 01:40:00.900]  But the prosecutor can get away with anything even when it's breaking the law and you can't
[01:40:00.900 --> 01:40:03.700]  go after him for it.
[01:40:03.700 --> 01:40:08.880]  So here we have an issue of someone needs to move to dismiss the case because the state
[01:40:08.880 --> 01:40:11.260]  cannot prove the elements necessary.
[01:40:11.260 --> 01:40:14.740]  They cannot prove DUI.
[01:40:14.740 --> 01:40:19.240]  And that's going to make it malicious prosecution, which means he can go after the cops.
[01:40:19.240 --> 01:40:25.580]  He can go after the judge, but he can't go after the prosecutor.
[01:40:25.580 --> 01:40:29.380]  And the prosecutor knows that of course, which is exactly why they're pursuing it in the
[01:40:29.380 --> 01:40:39.900]  hopes of getting a plea bargain out of it instead of a conviction.
[01:40:39.900 --> 01:40:44.440]  They figure if they keep the screws on hard and tight, he would rather cut a deal than
[01:40:44.440 --> 01:40:47.700]  risk losing.
[01:40:47.700 --> 01:40:49.700]  That's exactly what they're doing to him.
[01:40:49.700 --> 01:40:55.900]  And I'm, you know, I feel compelled to try to help somehow because it's a mom and pop
[01:40:55.900 --> 01:41:01.540]  business and about the pop, the business is threatened and therefore my job is threatened.
[01:41:01.540 --> 01:41:08.140]  The challenge to subject matter jurisdiction questions that you wrote out on tower of law
[01:41:08.140 --> 01:41:14.220]  with the pictures of the cops there and, you know, officer asks for brains that you substitute.
[01:41:14.220 --> 01:41:15.220]  You know what you want.
[01:41:15.220 --> 01:41:16.220]  I'm talking about.
[01:41:16.220 --> 01:41:20.220]  Uh, yeah, I know what you're talking about.
[01:41:20.220 --> 01:41:21.220]  Okay.
[01:41:21.220 --> 01:41:25.380]  Once he has surrendered his, his rights to that probable cause hearing and they have
[01:41:25.380 --> 01:41:31.660]  well, wait a minute, the, how did he surrender his rights to the probable cause hearing by
[01:41:31.660 --> 01:41:35.580]  signing a document saying that he would when they presented it to him.
[01:41:35.580 --> 01:41:40.380]  So the document specifically says, I waive my right to a, to a probable cause determination
[01:41:40.380 --> 01:41:41.380]  before magistrate.
[01:41:41.380 --> 01:41:46.460]  Yeah, that's what they did to him and he signed it because his public, did he have legal counsel
[01:41:46.460 --> 01:41:47.900]  when he signed it?
[01:41:47.900 --> 01:41:48.900]  Yeah.
[01:41:48.900 --> 01:41:52.800]  A public defender that's not really defending him.
[01:41:52.800 --> 01:41:57.580]  The public defender let him sign that saying that he didn't have a right to pro or didn't
[01:41:57.580 --> 01:41:59.420]  want a probable cause determination.
[01:41:59.420 --> 01:42:00.420]  Yeah.
[01:42:00.420 --> 01:42:04.780]  His public defender has told him that he's incapable of helping him when he can only
[01:42:04.780 --> 01:42:07.420]  help him get prosecuted to a lesser degree.
[01:42:07.420 --> 01:42:10.100]  Oh, ineffective assistance of counsel.
[01:42:10.100 --> 01:42:12.700]  He needs to make that claim right now.
[01:42:12.700 --> 01:42:19.020]  He needs to preserve that for appeal and he please Lord tell me he recorded that idiot
[01:42:19.020 --> 01:42:20.020]  saying that.
[01:42:20.020 --> 01:42:23.740]  No, it was a private conversation.
[01:42:23.740 --> 01:42:26.500]  It can be recorded even when it's private.
[01:42:26.500 --> 01:42:32.260]  Well, he didn't, he doesn't have the idea to do something like that.
[01:42:32.260 --> 01:42:33.260]  You didn't even know.
[01:42:33.260 --> 01:42:37.100]  Well, this attorney ain't never going to admit to saying that either.
[01:42:37.100 --> 01:42:41.940]  Hence the reason why you record your conversations even with your own attorney, because these
[01:42:41.940 --> 01:42:47.120]  people are selling you out and you need to be able to prove it when you go after the
[01:42:47.120 --> 01:42:51.140]  ineffective assistance of counsel, a claim on appeal.
[01:42:51.140 --> 01:42:57.420]  And when you sue them for legal malpractice, I can only help you get prosecuted to a lesser
[01:42:57.420 --> 01:42:58.420]  degree.
[01:42:58.420 --> 01:42:59.420]  Yeah.
[01:42:59.420 --> 01:43:04.060]  I wonder if he could fire his public defender.
[01:43:04.060 --> 01:43:10.360]  Well, they want to tell you that you can't, but I don't see how they can say that.
[01:43:10.360 --> 01:43:15.640]  If you have the right to choose your own counsel, then you have the right to fire a public defender
[01:43:15.640 --> 01:43:24.260]  and represent yourself or to seek other counsel that will be of actual assistance.
[01:43:24.260 --> 01:43:29.220]  Can this challenge to subject matter jurisdiction be raised at this point?
[01:43:29.220 --> 01:43:33.780]  Well, the question is what subject matters he challenged you?
[01:43:33.780 --> 01:43:34.780]  Transportation.
[01:43:34.780 --> 01:43:42.940]  That's the title that that particular charge is under, the DUI is under transportation.
[01:43:42.940 --> 01:43:44.740]  It's a criminal under transportation.
[01:43:44.740 --> 01:43:45.740]  Yeah.
[01:43:45.740 --> 01:43:50.020]  Well, he's got to be able to make the argument that the transportation doesn't apply in order
[01:43:50.020 --> 01:43:51.620]  to go after subject matter.
[01:43:51.620 --> 01:43:55.100]  Hang on just a second and we'll cover that on the other side.
[01:43:55.100 --> 01:43:56.100]  Okay.
[01:43:56.100 --> 01:44:00.220]  All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.220 --> 01:44:05.540]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.540 --> 01:44:09.020]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meris proven method.
[01:44:09.020 --> 01:44:13.340]  Michael Meris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:44:13.340 --> 01:44:14.660]  can win too.
[01:44:14.660 --> 01:44:19.180]  You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:44:19.180 --> 01:44:24.940]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:44:24.940 --> 01:44:29.580]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:44:29.580 --> 01:44:33.780]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.780 --> 01:44:38.900]  The Michael Meris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.900 --> 01:44:41.040]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:41.040 --> 01:44:46.580]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Meris banner
[01:44:46.580 --> 01:44:49.580]  or email MichaelMeris at Yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.580 --> 01:44:59.380]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[01:44:59.380 --> 01:45:00.380]  now.
[01:45:00.380 --> 01:45:04.140]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.140 --> 01:45:10.220]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD
[01:45:10.220 --> 01:45:14.660]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:14.660 --> 01:45:18.580]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.580 --> 01:45:22.900]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.900 --> 01:45:27.740]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[01:45:27.740 --> 01:45:34.300]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.300 --> 01:45:39.180]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:39.180 --> 01:45:43.340]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.340 --> 01:45:49.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.500 --> 01:45:52.100]  pro se tactics and much more.
[01:45:52.100 --> 01:45:59.900]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EASY.
[01:45:59.900 --> 01:46:12.780]  When the day I was born, the nurses all gathered round, they gazed in wide wonder at the joy
[01:46:12.780 --> 01:46:13.780]  they had found.
[01:46:13.780 --> 01:46:22.180]  The head nurse spoke up, said leave this one alone, she could tell right away that I was
[01:46:22.180 --> 01:46:34.700]  bad to the bone, bad to the bone, bad to the bone, b-b-b-b-b-bad, b-b-b-b-b-b-bad, b-b-b-b-b-b-b-bad.
[01:46:34.700 --> 01:46:39.620]  Alright folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio and we are talking with Lenny in
[01:46:39.620 --> 01:46:40.620]  Arizona.
[01:46:40.620 --> 01:46:43.620]  Alright Lenny, let's continue.
[01:46:43.620 --> 01:46:51.780]  Okay, I was wondering if at this point you could still challenge subject matter jurisdiction
[01:46:51.780 --> 01:46:57.180]  and you indicated that proving it is the difficult part?
[01:46:57.180 --> 01:47:02.020]  Right, if he has not done enough research with the statutes to prove that they're applicable
[01:47:02.020 --> 01:47:08.900]  only to a specific class of legal persons, then that's going to be a very difficult route
[01:47:08.900 --> 01:47:15.180]  to take because that also goes to personal jurisdiction.
[01:47:15.180 --> 01:47:22.140]  They can have both of those and have jurisdiction, but they can't have jurisdiction without both
[01:47:22.140 --> 01:47:24.260]  of them.
[01:47:24.260 --> 01:47:30.540]  So if he can show that there's no personal jurisdiction, i.e. not engaging in the commercial
[01:47:30.540 --> 01:47:37.100]  activity versus subject matter jurisdiction, these statutes are not applicable to me.
[01:47:37.100 --> 01:47:40.380]  You see which one's easier to actually prove?
[01:47:40.380 --> 01:47:45.300]  Well, the subject matter is transportation.
[01:47:45.300 --> 01:47:49.700]  According to the Arizona Constitution, there can only be one subject matter for all of
[01:47:49.700 --> 01:47:50.900]  them under that title.
[01:47:50.900 --> 01:47:53.620]  Right, Texas is the same way.
[01:47:53.620 --> 01:48:00.400]  Does the actual enacted bill by the legislature say that these are a compendium of statutes
[01:48:00.400 --> 01:48:05.300]  associated to the subject of transportation or something of that vernacular?
[01:48:05.300 --> 01:48:12.860]  Well, it says that the title can only have one subject matter.
[01:48:12.860 --> 01:48:18.180]  I got that, and I just told you what the title should say something similar to.
[01:48:18.180 --> 01:48:22.220]  That's the one of the title here in Texas of the bill that created our transportation
[01:48:22.220 --> 01:48:23.340]  code.
[01:48:23.340 --> 01:48:25.320]  That's what's in the title.
[01:48:25.320 --> 01:48:30.260]  This is a recodification of existing statutes relating to the subject of transportation.
[01:48:30.260 --> 01:48:38.020]  Ours is just one word, transportation, is the title.
[01:48:38.020 --> 01:48:40.020]  Okay.
[01:48:40.020 --> 01:48:42.540]  Does it define transportation anywhere?
[01:48:42.540 --> 01:48:43.840]  Nowhere.
[01:48:43.840 --> 01:48:47.340]  You have to depend on the federal transportation to...
[01:48:47.340 --> 01:48:52.740]  Well, then if you're going to rely on the federal, can you show a link between the state
[01:48:52.740 --> 01:48:56.060]  and the federal?
[01:48:56.060 --> 01:49:02.420]  See, this is the thing about how a lot of people are doing this.
[01:49:02.420 --> 01:49:06.460]  You can't simply jump into federal law unless you can show that there's a link between the
[01:49:06.460 --> 01:49:10.620]  state law and the federal law, which would allow the federal law to be controlling on
[01:49:10.620 --> 01:49:12.860]  the issue.
[01:49:12.860 --> 01:49:17.740]  You can't just assume it and you can't just assert it if you can't prove the link.
[01:49:17.740 --> 01:49:22.780]  Because states are allowed to make their own law outside of federal law, right?
[01:49:22.780 --> 01:49:26.940]  They just can't expand or alter federal law.
[01:49:26.940 --> 01:49:32.900]  All they can do is adopt an act that implements the federal law as written within the state.
[01:49:32.900 --> 01:49:38.400]  So there has to be a link showing that they did that latter thing, not the former thing
[01:49:38.400 --> 01:49:42.300]  of writing their own law.
[01:49:42.300 --> 01:49:45.360]  How about Supreme Court definitions of it?
[01:49:45.360 --> 01:49:48.640]  Would that be still considered federal law?
[01:49:48.640 --> 01:49:56.000]  If you can show that the Supreme Court definition is controlling on the state, if the case itself
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:50:01.540]  involved a federal transportation issue, you can't show a link to the state because of
[01:50:01.540 --> 01:50:03.160]  that.
[01:50:03.160 --> 01:50:08.740]  This would have to be something where a state issue was being raised and the Supreme Court
[01:50:08.740 --> 01:50:15.200]  said the definition of transportation here applies in all the states as well.
[01:50:15.200 --> 01:50:19.060]  Do you have a case like that?
[01:50:19.060 --> 01:50:22.060]  No.
[01:50:22.060 --> 01:50:23.660]  There you go.
[01:50:23.660 --> 01:50:28.720]  So if you can't show a link between the state statute and the federal statute, you can't
[01:50:28.720 --> 01:50:31.580]  make that argument and make it fly.
[01:50:31.580 --> 01:50:38.220]  Okay, now the question is, is how many places and how many codes, especially the transportation
[01:50:38.220 --> 01:50:49.440]  code, does Arizona law make reference to Title 49, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act?
[01:50:49.440 --> 01:50:55.680]  If you can show where the transportation act and code makes reference to Title 49 like
[01:50:55.680 --> 01:51:02.480]  it does here in Texas, both in the transportation code and the Texas administrative code, then
[01:51:02.480 --> 01:51:07.020]  you can prove a link between the state law and the federal law that would allow the federal
[01:51:07.020 --> 01:51:10.320]  law to be controlling.
[01:51:10.320 --> 01:51:16.860]  Not to mention on my legal blog, I've got an article up there that has federally published
[01:51:16.860 --> 01:51:25.500]  public records, they're stamped and everything, of Woodrow Wilson, I think it is, I'm trying
[01:51:25.500 --> 01:51:31.440]  to remember, talking about the enactment of the driver's license law at the federal level
[01:51:31.440 --> 01:51:36.700]  and how it was going to be implemented at the state level through those programs, which
[01:51:36.700 --> 01:51:41.320]  is the basis for every state's transportation and motor vehicle acts.
[01:51:41.320 --> 01:51:44.440]  It was Harry Truman.
[01:51:44.440 --> 01:51:46.120]  I'm sorry, Truman, you're right.
[01:51:46.120 --> 01:51:47.120]  You're right.
[01:51:47.120 --> 01:51:52.440]  Now, in relation to that, what you can then show is this.
[01:51:52.440 --> 01:51:58.440]  If the state law is based upon the federal law, then the state cannot expand it beyond
[01:51:58.440 --> 01:52:00.400]  the scope of the federal law itself.
[01:52:00.400 --> 01:52:01.400]  Okay?
[01:52:01.400 --> 01:52:09.120]  So if in one of the transportation statutes under the transportation title, I can find
[01:52:09.120 --> 01:52:12.340]  reference to Title 49, U.S. Title 49.
[01:52:12.340 --> 01:52:16.960]  Then you can show there's a link between that act and the federal law.
[01:52:16.960 --> 01:52:23.080]  But now here's the other thing, is Arizona, does the statutes in Arizona under the Transportation
[01:52:23.080 --> 01:52:32.480]  Act have anything called an interstate driver or a driver's license compact?
[01:52:32.480 --> 01:52:35.440]  I don't remember ever seeing that, and I've gone through all-
[01:52:35.440 --> 01:52:40.040]  I'm willing to bet you it does.
[01:52:40.040 --> 01:52:45.080]  Most of the states are party to the driver's license compact agreement.
[01:52:45.080 --> 01:52:48.920]  Those that are are operating under federal law.
[01:52:48.920 --> 01:52:50.640]  You know how we know that?
[01:52:50.640 --> 01:52:53.800]  Because one, the driver's license is federally implemented.
[01:52:53.800 --> 01:53:01.240]  Two, no state may enter into a compact contract or agreement with any other state of the union
[01:53:01.240 --> 01:53:05.600]  without express congressional approval.
[01:53:05.600 --> 01:53:10.240]  The only way they could give that approval is through a congressional act.
[01:53:10.240 --> 01:53:14.840]  The only congressional act relating to the subject at hand was the driver's license,
[01:53:14.840 --> 01:53:28.680]  which later became an all-encompassing act under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act.
[01:53:28.680 --> 01:53:29.680]  You following all that?
[01:53:29.680 --> 01:53:30.680]  I'm writing.
[01:53:30.680 --> 01:53:31.680]  Okay.
[01:53:31.680 --> 01:53:35.480]  The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act.
[01:53:35.480 --> 01:53:36.480]  Yes.
[01:53:36.480 --> 01:53:41.040]  So the interstate, it was an inter or intrastate license compact?
[01:53:41.040 --> 01:53:49.200]  Intrastate, interstate driver's license compact.
[01:53:49.200 --> 01:53:55.200]  So some place in our transportation statutes, it's going to mention that?
[01:53:55.200 --> 01:53:59.200]  There should be something in there titled that, yes.
[01:53:59.200 --> 01:54:04.760]  But the federal constitution is what says that no state may enter into any compact agreement
[01:54:04.760 --> 01:54:13.400]  or contract with any other state without express congressional approval.
[01:54:13.400 --> 01:54:18.040]  So that would indicate that Congress approved this and they have-
[01:54:18.040 --> 01:54:19.040]  Exactly.
[01:54:19.040 --> 01:54:25.560]  And what is the only way that Congress can approve an agreement on laws within the state?
[01:54:25.560 --> 01:54:30.920]  It has to be something relative to the 18 enumerated powers of Congress, right?
[01:54:30.920 --> 01:54:37.040]  And one of those is the, what's the commercial-
[01:54:37.040 --> 01:54:38.280]  The commerce clause.
[01:54:38.280 --> 01:54:40.280]  The commerce clause.
[01:54:40.280 --> 01:54:45.280]  Which is exactly what the driver's license act was implemented under.
[01:54:45.280 --> 01:54:52.640]  Which is exactly why a driver's license compact has to be associated with the interstate commerce
[01:54:52.640 --> 01:55:01.000]  clause.
[01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:06.080]  So if I can document all these things, I can prove that the transportation code is commercial
[01:55:06.080 --> 01:55:07.080]  in nature?
[01:55:07.080 --> 01:55:08.080]  Absolutely.
[01:55:08.080 --> 01:55:14.640]  That's the link, that's the series of links I need to prove that it's, and that would
[01:55:14.640 --> 01:55:20.760]  be it's only under commercial regulatory- Absolutely.
[01:55:20.760 --> 01:55:24.960]  Because when the state says that it, remember, the federal constitution reserved rights to
[01:55:24.960 --> 01:55:26.720]  the states and the people.
[01:55:26.720 --> 01:55:30.840]  Depending upon how you determine what state means, you're either talking about the people
[01:55:30.840 --> 01:55:35.420]  collectively or the people individually, okay?
[01:55:35.420 --> 01:55:40.080]  The way they're interpreting it, however, is they are saying state means the political
[01:55:40.080 --> 01:55:43.280]  fiction and not the people.
[01:55:43.280 --> 01:55:45.520]  That's an oxymoron.
[01:55:45.520 --> 01:55:53.320]  If all the power of the state comes from the people, then the state can only be the people.
[01:55:53.320 --> 01:55:57.720]  Everybody else is a public servant acting as an agent of the people who cannot have
[01:55:57.720 --> 01:56:01.760]  immunity from the people for the acts they commit against the people.
[01:56:01.760 --> 01:56:10.400]  But they're giving themselves these immunities, we're not.
[01:56:10.400 --> 01:56:12.440]  And that's where we better wake up.
[01:56:12.440 --> 01:56:16.320]  The inmates are trying to run the asylum and we're letting them.
[01:56:16.320 --> 01:56:24.360]  Well, I don't want to let them, but I'm feeling kind of inadequate to the fight just yet.
[01:56:24.360 --> 01:56:29.440]  And you will until you get this information inside and internalized, believe me.
[01:56:29.440 --> 01:56:33.080]  It will seem like an uphill battle until you reach the conclusion that you know this better
[01:56:33.080 --> 01:56:36.840]  than they do and you can cite it in your sleep.
[01:56:36.840 --> 01:56:45.840]  Okay, so I've got to find reference in the transportation code to...
[01:56:45.840 --> 01:56:51.960]  It'll either say interstate driver's license compact or driver's license compact.
[01:56:51.960 --> 01:56:57.360]  But I would just do a search for the word compact.
[01:56:57.360 --> 01:57:01.280]  The computer program that we have doesn't allow word searches like that.
[01:57:01.280 --> 01:57:03.920]  What do you mean the computer program you have?
[01:57:03.920 --> 01:57:11.440]  Well, the legislative department puts up a website that you can access to revise statutes
[01:57:11.440 --> 01:57:13.360]  for and there's no...
[01:57:13.360 --> 01:57:15.840]  There's got to be a search function on it.
[01:57:15.840 --> 01:57:16.840]  There has to be.
[01:57:16.840 --> 01:57:21.920]  Yeah, there's a search function, but it doesn't let you do word searches.
[01:57:21.920 --> 01:57:29.200]  You can search for a statute up at the top of the page.
[01:57:29.200 --> 01:57:35.200]  You can search for a bill search, search articles 20...
[01:57:35.200 --> 01:57:38.400]  I'm in article 28, which is transportation right now.
[01:57:38.400 --> 01:57:41.240]  I can search it.
[01:57:41.240 --> 01:57:43.240]  Let me type in this and see what happens.
[01:57:43.240 --> 01:57:44.240]  Interstate...
[01:57:44.240 --> 01:57:46.240]  I hear the music.
[01:57:46.240 --> 01:57:49.200]  Yep, that's the end of the show there.
[01:57:49.200 --> 01:57:51.520]  Yeah, there's...
[01:57:51.520 --> 01:57:54.600]  Right there on the very first page, there's an ARS search field.
[01:57:54.600 --> 01:58:00.240]  You just type your word in there and it should find it.
[01:58:00.240 --> 01:58:03.240]  Okay, thanks for all your help, Eddie.
[01:58:03.240 --> 01:58:04.360]  Ah, no worries.
[01:58:04.360 --> 01:58:07.840]  If you know the correct title, then this should be no problem to find it.
[01:58:07.840 --> 01:58:08.840]  Okay?
[01:58:08.840 --> 01:58:11.840]  All right, thank you very much.
[01:58:11.840 --> 01:58:12.840]  Yes, sir.
[01:58:12.840 --> 01:58:13.840]  All right.
[01:58:13.840 --> 01:58:14.840]  Sorry, I wasn't able to get to everybody.
[01:58:14.840 --> 01:58:15.840]  We ran out of time.
[01:58:15.840 --> 01:58:16.840]  That's just the way it goes sometimes.
[01:58:16.840 --> 01:58:21.640]  All right, folks, I want to thank you all for calling in and for listening.
[01:58:21.640 --> 01:58:25.120]  Thank you so much for making the show successful and popular.
[01:58:25.120 --> 01:58:27.480]  I really appreciate that.
[01:58:27.480 --> 01:58:29.100]  Please keep us in your financial prayers.
[01:58:29.100 --> 01:58:33.960]  We still need money and donations to keep the network going, plus to help out with all
[01:58:33.960 --> 01:58:38.280]  the time we spend doing this research and helping you folks out.
[01:58:38.280 --> 01:58:42.280]  Not everybody can afford to pay us and we help as many as we can and those that can
[01:58:42.280 --> 01:58:46.040]  afford it, I appreciate your clientele as well.
[01:58:46.040 --> 01:58:48.360]  All right, folks, I want to thank you again.
[01:58:48.360 --> 01:58:53.440]  Y'all have a great day.
[01:59:18.360 --> 01:59:47.560]  Y'all have a great day.
[01:59:47.560 --> 01:59:56.600]  Y'all have a great day.