ROL_2017-06-15_16k.timecode
[00:13.040 --> 00:24.880] an ounce, Texas crude $45.83 a barrel, and bitcoin is sitting at about 2,683 US currency.
[00:24.880 --> 00:31.760] Today in history, the year? 1967. The US Supreme Court in Loving vs Virginia declares all US
[00:31.760 --> 00:41.760] state laws which prohibit interracial marriage to be unconstitutional. Today in history.
[00:41.760 --> 00:45.800] In recent news, British Prime Minister Theresa May, who stayed in as Prime Minister after
[00:45.800 --> 00:50.200] Thursday's election last week, will be meeting newly elected French President Emmanuel Macron
[00:50.200 --> 00:55.520] to focus, as May's spokesperson has revealed, along with company reps, on counter-terrorism
[00:55.520 --> 00:59.780] and dealing with online extremism. This meeting most likely scheduled in response after the
[00:59.780 --> 01:03.440] two terror attacks, one in Manchester and the other in London, which resulted in the
[01:03.440 --> 01:07.760] 30 souls murdered. According to Theresa May's office, she is said to read the following
[01:07.760 --> 01:12.800] statement in her speech, quote, the counter-terrorism cooperation between British and French intelligence
[01:12.800 --> 01:17.000] agencies is already strong, but President Macron and I agree that more should be done
[01:17.000 --> 01:21.680] to tackle the terrorist threat online. We need to encourage corporations to do more
[01:21.680 --> 01:27.040] to abide by their social responsibility, with the speech potentially containing a call in,
[01:27.040 --> 01:32.620] quote, creating new legal liability for tech companies if they fail to remove unacceptable
[01:32.620 --> 01:38.240] content. It seems that the recent G7 meeting has commenced its campaign to sell the agenda
[01:38.240 --> 01:44.160] of fighting online extremism by further controlling and monitoring the online content of the tax
[01:44.160 --> 01:47.520] paying citizenry.
[01:47.520 --> 01:55.720] 30-year-old Shiite Muslim Daimur Raza was found guilty and sentenced to death on Saturday
[01:55.720 --> 02:03.360] in an anti-terrorism Pakistani court by Judge Bashir Ahmed in the Punjab province for blasphemy
[02:03.360 --> 02:08.280] against Mohammed, the founder of Islam, being accused of saying derogatory statements about
[02:08.280 --> 02:13.600] the self-proclaimed prophet to his wives and others on Facebook and WhatsApp. Apparently
[02:13.600 --> 02:17.640] this is the first documented case anyone has been given the death penalty for blasphemy
[02:17.640 --> 02:23.040] on social media in Pakistan. Mohammed Shafi Qureshi, the prosecutor in the case, stated
[02:23.040 --> 02:27.580] that, quote, the forensic report of his mobile phone showed that he had committed blasphemy
[02:27.580 --> 02:32.480] in at least 3,000 posts. This new protocol seems to be right in line with the interior
[02:32.480 --> 02:38.040] minister of Pakistan, who asked Facebook to identify people suspected of committing blasphemy
[02:38.040 --> 02:41.520] so that they could be prosecuted.
[02:41.520 --> 02:45.440] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have a product or a service
[02:45.440 --> 02:52.320] you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. This was
[02:52.320 --> 03:21.520] Brooke Brody with your Lowdown for June 12, 2017.
[03:22.320 --> 03:39.360] All righty, howdy, howdy. This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio. On this,
[03:39.360 --> 03:53.720] the 15th day of June 2017, and the Electronic Lawyer Project has officially been launched.
[03:53.720 --> 04:02.280] I have the website up and working. I'm able to merge the documents and produce output.
[04:02.280 --> 04:09.640] I'm ready to go with this thing. And this is the first implementation of the whole Electronic
[04:09.640 --> 04:18.000] Lawyer Project. We will take this project where someone, if you get a ticket, you go
[04:18.000 --> 04:25.300] online and you put in the information off your ticket. And from that, we will develop
[04:25.300 --> 04:32.840] all of the front end documents that you need to file in a traffic case in Texas. Primarily
[04:32.840 --> 04:42.440] I'm starting out with municipal courts because on reading the law, municipal courts simply
[04:42.440 --> 04:51.480] cannot enforce transportation code, period. There is no law granting them authority over
[04:51.480 --> 05:00.160] the commercial transportation scheme. And this is where we start out. We will produce
[05:00.160 --> 05:07.020] all the front end documents, a counterclaim against the police officer. We filed the counterclaim
[05:07.020 --> 05:15.000] in the criminal case. And we're going to give the judge a problem because the judge had
[05:15.000 --> 05:21.800] this officer come to him and accused us of a crime. And he initiated this prosecution
[05:21.800 --> 05:28.840] through the prosecutor. Well, we go to the judge in his capacity as a magistrate and
[05:28.840 --> 05:37.580] maintain that the officer who brought this complaint in securing the complaint committed
[05:37.580 --> 05:46.320] first degree felony aggravated perjury against the accused. Now you took the Class C misdemeanor
[05:46.320 --> 05:54.080] complaint against the citizen. Now what are you going to do with the class, with the first
[05:54.080 --> 06:01.120] degree felony criminal complaint against the officer? Are you just going to throw that
[06:01.120 --> 06:09.080] in the trash? Okay. We don't care what he does because once we put these front end documents
[06:09.080 --> 06:18.320] in, we have lots of stuff following it. And we also put in two information requests and
[06:18.320 --> 06:28.680] these information requests ask for the certification of the officer who wrote the citation to enforce
[06:28.680 --> 06:35.360] the Texas Transportation Code because the transportation code was clearly established
[06:35.360 --> 06:44.640] as a professional conduct code. And the Department of Public Safety was created for this specific
[06:44.640 --> 06:56.740] purpose of enforcing that professional conduct. Just like the bar, just like the state commission
[06:56.740 --> 07:02.400] on judicial conduct, American Medical Association, American Psychiatric Association.
[07:02.400 --> 07:10.960] These are all professional oversight groups. Well, the Department of Public Safety is the
[07:10.960 --> 07:18.800] same thing, except they're for commercial drivers. Well, the cities looked at the municipalities
[07:18.800 --> 07:28.800] and they saw a lot of money. The money that the public would not give them in taxes, they're
[07:28.800 --> 07:36.360] stealing in traffic enforcement. We don't need traffic enforcement for ordinary citizens.
[07:36.360 --> 07:44.720] We have the criminal laws that'll serve that purpose far better than the traffic transportation
[07:44.720 --> 07:50.400] code scheme that they're using now. If you get out here and run a red light and cause
[07:50.400 --> 07:59.280] an accident, under the penal code, you can go to prison for negligent endangerment or
[07:59.280 --> 08:06.920] reckless endangerment. It's a class B misdemeanor. You can go to jail for it. You'll be a lot
[08:06.920 --> 08:14.800] more careful. We won't get so many tickets. There won't be this massive prosecution. And
[08:14.800 --> 08:19.320] we won't have as many people being careless because it's just $300 fine. It's not that
[08:19.320 --> 08:25.480] big a deal. But if you look at going to jail, then you'd be more careful.
[08:25.480 --> 08:33.400] We literally don't need enforcement of a professional conduct code against the ordinary individual.
[08:33.400 --> 08:39.200] And besides, it's totally legal. Whether it's right, wrong, whether we need it or don't
[08:39.200 --> 08:45.360] need it the way they've done it is absolutely against the law. And we charge them with it.
[08:45.360 --> 08:55.480] So you file in all these documents, special appearance to challenge subject matter jurisdiction,
[08:55.480 --> 09:02.920] challenge the authority of the policing agency to enforce the code. Your standard Brady motion,
[09:02.920 --> 09:09.760] motion in limity, motion to preserve rights, which includes speedy trial and several others,
[09:09.760 --> 09:17.080] objection to oral argument, demand that the judge read every pleading and rule on every
[09:17.080 --> 09:22.040] element of every plea. Failure to rule on one of those would be considered official
[09:22.040 --> 09:34.400] oppression and misfeasance in office. You file all of those and then they'll go to that
[09:34.400 --> 09:36.220] original appearance.
[09:36.220 --> 09:40.880] And we explain to them what's gonna happen at the original appearance and we explain
[09:40.880 --> 09:51.440] to them what's wrong with it. It's criminal. You got a clerk there impersonating a magistrate.
[09:51.440 --> 09:57.800] Because when you signed the ticket, you did not agree to appear before a clerk, a prosecutor
[09:57.800 --> 10:07.620] or even a judge. You agreed to appear before a magistrate. And so you go in there and you
[10:07.620 --> 10:15.640] have this clerk impersonating a public official. What we tell people, don't argue with her.
[10:15.640 --> 10:23.040] And by all means, do not try to give the clerk legal advice. If you try to tell the clerk
[10:23.040 --> 10:31.400] what the law is and what your rights are, she is trained to treat that as a threat.
[10:31.400 --> 10:36.400] And she will call the bailiff over, accuse you of being agitated. And then the bailiff
[10:36.400 --> 10:40.700] will drag his knuckles over there and let you know all the bad things he's gonna do
[10:40.700 --> 10:46.660] to you if you don't do exactly what you're told, when you're told, how you're told.
[10:46.660 --> 10:54.720] So we suggest don't give them fair warning. Don't argue with them. Just do whatever they
[10:54.720 --> 11:02.340] say. And when they ask for a plea, you can hand them a copy of the special pleading that
[11:02.340 --> 11:09.600] we send you. Oh, you want a plea? Here you go. Here's one. And if they refuse to take
[11:09.600 --> 11:19.660] any filings, that's okay. We don't mind because now you come back to us. And we're building
[11:19.660 --> 11:25.560] a set of questionnaires. Did they do this? Did they do this? Did they do this? We'll
[11:25.560 --> 11:30.480] go through all of the scenarios of the things we've had people tell us happened and the
[11:30.480 --> 11:38.400] things that had happened to us. And we develop motions, pleadings, criminal complaints, whatever
[11:38.400 --> 11:47.160] is indicated. And then the second round, we dropped the second round of documents on them.
[11:47.160 --> 11:53.040] We've been trying to get people to write criminal complaints, to file judicial conduct complaints,
[11:53.040 --> 11:59.640] to file bar grievances and t-close complaints. Well, you gotta sit down and figure all this
[11:59.640 --> 12:09.720] stuff out. Well, what I'm doing with this tool is I'm automating it into the system.
[12:09.720 --> 12:13.560] You fill in the information off the ticket, you get all these documents, all you gotta
[12:13.560 --> 12:18.140] do is sign and send them. We've objected to any oral arguments. So if they try to get
[12:18.140 --> 12:23.960] you to say anything in court, you to tell them, you stand on your pleadings. Well, we
[12:23.960 --> 12:26.960] were against you. Yeah, no, you will just do whatever you're gonna do, but I'm gonna
[12:26.960 --> 12:34.240] stand on my pleadings. What is before the court is what matters. If the prosecutor tries
[12:34.240 --> 12:42.480] to speak at all, you object. You have demanded that the court rule on the pleadings. We've
[12:42.480 --> 12:50.200] demanded that the court require the prosecutor to answer all pleadings. They never bother
[12:50.200 --> 12:58.960] because it's too time consuming. Cost money. Traffic enforcement is not about public safety.
[12:58.960 --> 13:05.600] It is about the money and nothing else. And they're not gonna do anything to lower their
[13:05.600 --> 13:11.080] efficiency. Okay, well, you go in there and they do what they do. You come back, we give
[13:11.080 --> 13:14.840] you a bunch of criminal complaints to file against the clerk, professional conduct against
[13:14.840 --> 13:19.520] the clerk. Oh, in the original pleadings, you also get a t-close complaint against the
[13:19.520 --> 13:27.960] police officer. That's probably the most damning thing we give you.
[13:27.960 --> 13:33.740] The criminal complaint he's not so concerned about. He's pretty sure that they'll get this
[13:33.740 --> 13:41.940] thing tossed out. The t-close complaint, there's not anything he can do about that. That goes
[13:41.940 --> 13:51.140] on his record, puts a mark on his chart, stays there forever. So when the boss sends this
[13:51.140 --> 13:57.080] police officer out to write a ticket, and he winds up with a first degree felony aggravated
[13:57.080 --> 14:03.160] assault chart that may or may not get enforced or he may or may not get indicted for a lesser
[14:03.160 --> 14:05.920] included offense.
[14:05.920 --> 14:11.120] And a t-close complaint that goes on his professional record and stays there every time he tries
[14:11.120 --> 14:17.000] to get hired somewhere else, they're going to look at these t-close complaints first.
[14:17.000 --> 14:23.640] So he's really going to be unhappy. We give the officer plausible deniability for not
[14:23.640 --> 14:33.140] writing these tickets. We sick the officers on the system. It's all about the politics.
[14:33.140 --> 14:38.680] And then when your clerk does what she's trained to do, you file criminal charges against the
[14:38.680 --> 14:45.680] clerk and she is really going to be unhappy. At the end of the day, it's all politics and
[14:45.680 --> 14:56.160] we will be generating as much politics as possible. And it's as much, we will cost them
[14:56.160 --> 15:04.280] as much as we possibly can. It's all about the money. If they can't make money collecting
[15:04.280 --> 15:09.400] these traffic citations, if it winds up costing them their careers, they'll go find another
[15:09.400 --> 15:15.680] way to steal money from the public. But we intend to stop them from doing it with the
[15:15.680 --> 15:16.680] traffic.
[15:16.680 --> 15:24.800] Okay, we have a caller, Kathy in Texas. We've got about a minute or so before the break.
[15:24.800 --> 15:34.520] Well, hello. Well, hello, Kathy. Hi, Randy. I just wanted to have two points. Basically,
[15:34.520 --> 15:39.240] one is I've passed out the traffic website to some people who have been very successful
[15:39.240 --> 15:44.200] already and getting through some tickets and one that you know personally, and she's excited
[15:44.200 --> 15:47.240] and she's going to give you feedback.
[15:47.240 --> 15:48.240] Wonderful.
[15:48.240 --> 15:53.600] That's good news. The other thing, you know, they already have another way of revenue besides
[15:53.600 --> 15:59.040] the traffic ticket and they're taxing our businesses out of downtown. You know about
[15:59.040 --> 16:03.440] that, right? The Carmelo's closing.
[16:03.440 --> 16:07.000] I'm not in Austin anymore, so I'm not.
[16:07.000 --> 16:13.360] Well, Carmelo's closing because of taxes and several of the 30 and 35 year old town home
[16:13.360 --> 16:19.300] areas near the university, they're shutting down because they've been taxed out of business.
[16:19.300 --> 16:23.000] The city said everybody pays the same tax now and they slapped them with a bill equal
[16:23.000 --> 16:30.600] to the Hyatt Regency. It's like, okay, so if you're on 6th Street and you're in the
[16:30.600 --> 16:34.920] gang, I guess you're okay and everybody else gets taxed away.
[16:34.920 --> 16:36.920] That's always been the way it is.
[16:36.920 --> 16:43.720] Yeah. So I do have one thing to talk to after the break, if you don't mind, and I think
[16:43.720 --> 16:45.720] a grand jury issue maybe.
[16:45.720 --> 16:51.480] All righty. Wonderful. This is Randy Hilton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio. Call in
[16:51.480 --> 16:55.960] number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[17:21.480 --> 17:28.480] We'll be right back.
[17:51.480 --> 17:58.480] We'll be right back.
[18:21.480 --> 18:28.480] We'll be right back.
[18:51.480 --> 18:58.480] We'll be right back.
[19:21.480 --> 19:43.920] Okay, we are back. Randy Hilton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Kathy
[19:43.920 --> 19:50.600] in Texas. Okay, go ahead, Kathy. Now, I'm not familiar with what's going on in Austin
[19:50.600 --> 19:54.840] on the taxes. It would seem you would have some recourse.
[19:54.840 --> 20:00.600] Well, it's too late for Carmelo's particularly because it's been going on for a year and
[20:00.600 --> 20:05.640] he was trying to fight it and they pretty much came back and said, no, this is what
[20:05.640 --> 20:10.800] the property is taxed at now. Take it or leave it, fill up if you have to or whatever. So
[20:10.800 --> 20:18.500] it's a new way of land grabbing. It's a new way of eminent domain. They'll just tax you
[20:18.500 --> 20:24.000] out of it. So we have a city council that's so sold out and they're just selling us up
[20:24.000 --> 20:28.440] the river and it's all, you know, I would like to see where the money really goes because
[20:28.440 --> 20:36.600] it's not going into things that have been, you know, voted on. But that's a side issue
[20:36.600 --> 20:37.600] for me.
[20:37.600 --> 20:45.000] What I was wanting to talk to you about tonight really, last Saturday, we had a bicycle accident
[20:45.000 --> 20:51.320] here in Austin and a group of six riders were, you know, out for their ride and riding on
[20:51.320 --> 20:57.280] the side of the road and not even, you know, not on the highway, just on a major street.
[20:57.280 --> 21:04.520] And a guy came along and just plowed them down and he didn't even slow down. He just
[21:04.520 --> 21:10.480] ran into the back of them and, you know, six people in bikes scattered almost three blocks.
[21:10.480 --> 21:17.960] And what was very interesting is they gave him a ticket for driving without a license
[21:17.960 --> 21:27.000] or without a valid license and without insurance. That was it. The bikers, of course, are livid.
[21:27.000 --> 21:32.200] And one of my friends was in that group and she's going, we need better laws and we need
[21:32.200 --> 21:37.280] better bike lanes and we need all this. And I said, no, no, no, we need to hold the individuals
[21:37.280 --> 21:40.680] responsible who do these stupid things.
[21:40.680 --> 21:46.320] And so the question I have is, I know right away they have a civil suit if they want to
[21:46.320 --> 21:53.920] sue the guy. But don't they have the opportunity to take that to the grand jury and try and
[21:53.920 --> 22:01.480] get that guy charged with vehicular assault or something criminal? Is that not a criminal
[22:01.480 --> 22:02.480] act?
[22:02.480 --> 22:10.800] The police have no special prerogative when it comes to filing criminal complaints. Now,
[22:10.800 --> 22:20.160] the courts have done everything they can to put all policing in the hands of the police
[22:20.160 --> 22:24.240] that work essentially for them and under them.
[22:24.240 --> 22:31.160] They will do anything they can to keep us from becoming a part of the system. Well,
[22:31.160 --> 22:38.040] this is primarily what I do. There is nothing in law that prevents you from giving notice
[22:38.040 --> 22:47.680] to a grand jury of crime. Anybody gets in your way, they're witness tampering and obstructing.
[22:47.680 --> 22:54.800] We need these six riders to go down there and file criminal charges against this person
[22:54.800 --> 23:04.080] for vehicular assault, something of that nature. You don't need to ask the prosecutor's permission.
[23:04.080 --> 23:09.480] You don't need to ask the police department's permission. They don't need to investigate
[23:09.480 --> 23:13.360] it. That's what the grand jury can do.
[23:13.360 --> 23:22.360] And I would say, make up the complaints, take them down there and you walk into the district
[23:22.360 --> 23:28.240] courthouse. When you come in the door, you look to your right. And if you look past the
[23:28.240 --> 23:32.240] information desk that's on the right side of the building, there's a little walkway
[23:32.240 --> 23:35.480] behind it. You're looking right at the door to the grand jury.
[23:35.480 --> 23:38.240] Oh, that's good to know.
[23:38.240 --> 23:43.680] Yeah, you just walk in there. When you're walking in, you're looking at the grand juries.
[23:43.680 --> 23:50.040] There's a little alcove there with two doorways, one in front of you and one going the opposite
[23:50.040 --> 23:54.640] direction. That goes into district attorney's office. But the one right in front of you,
[23:54.640 --> 24:00.440] that's the grand jury. You just go in there and there'll be a bailiff sitting there. Hand
[24:00.440 --> 24:07.120] him 12 folders and say, here, first you tell the bailiff instruct the foreman that I have
[24:07.120 --> 24:13.160] business with the grand jury. And the foreman will say, may I tell him the nature of the
[24:13.160 --> 24:17.760] business? Yes, you can. Give him these and give him the complaints.
[24:17.760 --> 24:22.320] Now the prosecutor will come and intercept him. That's what they did with me. Then you
[24:22.320 --> 24:28.000] start hammering the prosecutor. You go back with criminal complaints against the prosecutor.
[24:28.000 --> 24:33.160] It took me a while, but I got all the highest judges in Texas put in front of the grand
[24:33.160 --> 24:43.280] jury that way. And if we get more people doing that, we will have less problems getting there.
[24:43.280 --> 24:53.440] The only reason they can do this is that nobody stands up to them. This is the idea behind
[24:53.440 --> 25:01.720] this ticket program. We've got 6.6 million people who got a ticket in Texas last year.
[25:01.720 --> 25:07.880] That's a quarter of the population. And no one was hurt except the person who
[25:07.880 --> 25:13.640] got robbed. Yeah, robbed by the police. Well, this is
[25:13.640 --> 25:20.600] a way to wake people up. And these six riders, they need to protect themselves and all the
[25:20.600 --> 25:25.240] other riders out there. That's right. But we don't need more laws
[25:25.240 --> 25:32.840] against this. We don't need more traffic law. We need some action on their part. And I just
[25:32.840 --> 25:37.920] wanted to be sure before I go and stir up the harness nest in that group of people,
[25:37.920 --> 25:44.920] I wanted to be sure that I should. Send them to me. I will help them write them.
[25:44.920 --> 25:50.880] I'll show them how to do it. You remember with our friend, but we were
[25:50.880 --> 25:56.080] not able to get in to the Hays County grand jury, but we made enough noise that it was
[25:56.080 --> 26:06.480] finally dropped the charges against us. But yeah, for this, I feel certain if I were in
[26:06.480 --> 26:14.400] that position, I would be taking Professor Gray's course and going through the whole
[26:14.400 --> 26:22.000] personal suits against them immediately. And then I would be trying to go to the grand
[26:22.000 --> 26:29.480] jury as well, because, I mean, we have a couple, a couple is still in the hospital and one
[26:29.480 --> 26:33.280] of the ladies had brain hemorrhaging and all this kind of stuff. I mean, there were some
[26:33.280 --> 26:40.640] really serious injuries and it should not go away with a ticket. Oh, you didn't have
[26:40.640 --> 26:43.960] a license and you didn't have insurance. So that's okay that you ran people down on the
[26:43.960 --> 26:51.560] road. I just, it's getting in my craw. They need to charge the police officers with
[26:51.560 --> 26:56.000] obstruction of justice. Okay.
[26:56.000 --> 27:02.760] They listen to their bosses and their bosses say, Oh, we don't want to bother prosecuting
[27:02.760 --> 27:10.000] this. They, the guys doesn't have any money we can steal from him. So what's the point?
[27:10.000 --> 27:17.960] So they leave him out there to do this again. They set it up so people feel like they can
[27:17.960 --> 27:24.520] just run you over and there's no consequences. Yeah. So visit some consequences on the police
[27:24.520 --> 27:32.480] officers. Okay. You don't want to do your job. T close complaint, every one of them.
[27:32.480 --> 27:39.760] Okay. The other thing is we're saying vehicular assault. Is there something else specifically
[27:39.760 --> 27:46.720] that you think we ought to go for? That goes to, that goes to aggravated assault with a
[27:46.720 --> 27:54.280] deadly weapon. If you bump, bump somebody with your car, somebody on a bicycle with
[27:54.280 --> 27:58.320] your car, you go to jail for that.
[27:58.320 --> 28:03.920] Well you should go to jail for that. Now, if somebody bumps my car with their bicycle,
[28:03.920 --> 28:08.640] I'm going to be blamed for putting my car in their way. But if I drive up and I bumped
[28:08.640 --> 28:16.760] somebody with my car, I've got 3,500 pounds of pig iron. When I get in that 3,500 pounds
[28:16.760 --> 28:25.280] of pig iron and start moving it around the highway, I need to be very, very careful.
[28:25.280 --> 28:28.560] If I'm not very, very careful, I need to go to jail.
[28:28.560 --> 28:35.120] Well at least be responsible for it at some level. I mean, not just walk away with, you
[28:35.120 --> 28:41.760] know, whatever $200 ticket or whatever it is. It's, it's crazy. So yeah, that's, that's
[28:41.760 --> 28:45.240] really what I, I just want to kind of get a reassurance to you that this is the kind
[28:45.240 --> 28:53.040] of thing that we, we can do and, and we need to do to get the attention of the DA or whoever,
[28:53.040 --> 28:56.480] because there should be charges filed on this guy.
[28:56.480 --> 29:04.600] Okay. But the DA doesn't file charges. I mean, well, people file charges. That's what people
[29:04.600 --> 29:10.760] need to understand. A policeman, when he files criminal complaints, he doesn't do that in
[29:10.760 --> 29:17.200] his capacity as a policeman. He does that in his personal capacity.
[29:17.200 --> 29:21.840] Okay. Then that's why it's not getting done.
[29:21.840 --> 29:29.560] Well he's been, he's following the politics. You don't have that same political pressure.
[29:29.560 --> 29:32.040] Hang on, Randy Kelton.
[29:32.040 --> 29:33.740] I'm done.
[29:33.740 --> 29:35.720] Okay. You're done. Okay. Thank you, Kathy.
[29:35.720 --> 29:37.280] See you later. Bye bye.
[29:37.280 --> 29:40.120] Always good to hear your voice. Okay. Bye bye.
[29:40.120 --> 29:41.120] Bye bye.
[29:41.120 --> 29:45.960] We're about to go to break. This is Randy Kelton, Rula Radio, Randy Kelton Davis-Stevens,
[29:45.960 --> 29:51.760] Rula Radio, and Boris Scott, I see you there. We'll pick you up on the other side. We'll
[29:51.760 --> 29:53.760] be right back.
[29:53.760 --> 30:06.960] Did you know that cell phones can cause constipation, anorexia, and depression if they get into
[30:06.960 --> 30:11.600] the wrong hands? Or should I say the wrong jaws? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll
[30:11.600 --> 30:16.480] be back with a painful saga of Gina's wireless woes in just a moment.
[30:16.480 --> 30:20.840] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[30:20.840 --> 30:26.440] again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.440 --> 30:32.600] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[30:32.600 --> 30:37.640] it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:37.640 --> 30:45.280] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.280 --> 30:50.120] Remember TikTok the crocodile from Peter Pan? He swallowed an alarm clock, and his ticking
[30:50.120 --> 30:54.680] could be heard all across Never Never Land. Well, a modern day twist on this fairy tale
[30:54.680 --> 31:00.440] story recently happened at an aquarium in the Ukraine. Gina, a 14-year-old crocodile,
[31:00.440 --> 31:05.040] now emits a Nokia ringtone from the depths of her stomach. She swallowed the smartphone
[31:05.040 --> 31:09.940] when a visitor accidentally dropped it into her tank last month. Unfortunately, the ringing
[31:09.940 --> 31:15.000] reptile isn't feeling too good after her high-tech snack. She's not eating, and she's moving
[31:15.000 --> 31:19.480] lethargically. I guess there's not an app for that. Gina's handlers plan a surgery to
[31:19.480 --> 31:24.040] retrieve the phone, but I'm guessing its owner won't be wanting it back. I'm Dr. Catherine
[31:24.040 --> 31:53.960] Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:54.040 --> 31:59.480] And see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you only at MUSA.org.
[31:59.480 --> 32:06.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[32:06.000 --> 32:09.000] we live in an us against them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a
[32:09.000 --> 32:13.000] free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.220] rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[32:16.220 --> 32:20.200] private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts
[32:20.200 --> 32:24.240] afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[32:24.240 --> 32:28.360] through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law
[32:28.360 --> 32:31.500] Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[32:31.500 --> 32:35.400] understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. You can
[32:35.400 --> 32:39.600] get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and ordering
[32:39.600 --> 32:43.560] your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation
[32:43.560 --> 32:48.000] Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.680] research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights
[32:51.680 --> 32:56.320] with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com. Order your copy today and together we can
[32:56.320 --> 33:07.320] have the free society we all want and deserve. Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:07.320 --> 33:37.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, here with Debra Stevens.
[33:37.280 --> 33:58.880] Hey, Randy. Well, let's see now. Let me go back and catch everybody up to where we are
[33:58.880 --> 34:04.360] so everybody can kind of follow the story along. And the last thing that happened just
[34:04.360 --> 34:10.000] a couple hours ago is real interesting. I think we'll make an interesting twist on where
[34:10.000 --> 34:15.800] it's all at right now. So this will lead up to something kind of funny and useful too,
[34:15.800 --> 34:24.560] I hope. Anyway, back in the middle of December, we put my house in escrows, people who want
[34:24.560 --> 34:30.500] to buy it. So we went through the escrow company and put it in escrow. And we did that knowing
[34:30.500 --> 34:37.920] that we would need to pay off or resolve a contract for deed on the property. And that
[34:37.920 --> 34:42.960] in order to really do that, for them to get clear title, we would need to get a release
[34:42.960 --> 34:47.280] of lien signatures from an ex-husband and ex-wife.
[34:47.280 --> 34:54.640] Okay. Hold on, hold on. He bought it from someone and after he bought it from them,
[34:54.640 --> 35:00.040] they had marital difficulties and split. The husband's trying to hide the assets from the
[35:00.040 --> 35:09.000] wife of the payments on the property. So he tells Boris to stop paying. And then the wife
[35:09.000 --> 35:14.000] finds out about it. Now she's trying to take the house back, but she has no claim on the
[35:14.000 --> 35:18.680] house because it was already sold. So now they're trying to interfere with the sale
[35:18.680 --> 35:25.280] because somehow she doesn't like the sale that she didn't disagree with when it occurred.
[35:25.280 --> 35:34.760] Okay. Now where are we Boris? Well, okay. Well, back in, in the last week
[35:34.760 --> 35:41.160] of April, we had been in contact with the ex-wife. She didn't really show a lot of interest
[35:41.160 --> 35:47.240] in, in, you know, having us pay off whatever was there. She just kind of ignored it. So
[35:47.240 --> 35:51.360] we thought, well, maybe she's not interested, you know, but we're not getting anywhere with
[35:51.360 --> 35:57.280] her. So we'll just, I'm just going to close the deal anyway, even though the new people
[35:57.280 --> 36:02.320] would not be able to really have clear title and really would not be able to get title
[36:02.320 --> 36:08.720] insurance right away. But we're not getting any cooperation and they want, they won't
[36:08.720 --> 36:15.240] use the house. But then we told the ex-wife, we said, here, I'll try to come to the title
[36:15.240 --> 36:22.240] company next week when we do this. And, you know, just being real open with her. Well,
[36:22.240 --> 36:31.560] instead of coming to the closing meeting, right, the meeting was at 10 o'clock on Wednesday.
[36:31.560 --> 36:38.040] Well, she had her attorney file a lawsuit and it was pending against the house right
[36:38.040 --> 36:44.600] at 9-11 in the morning, right within the tunnel hour before we were going to close. And then
[36:44.600 --> 36:51.720] so with the list pendants on the house, we got to looking at that and found that the
[36:51.720 --> 36:59.640] ex-wife who was the petitioner of this lawsuit, she, you know, is named on the list pendants
[36:59.640 --> 37:07.880] as the petitioner. Then we noticed that she also notarized the list pendants. She's shown
[37:07.880 --> 37:16.240] on there with her name as the petitioner and then down at the bottom as the notary. So
[37:16.240 --> 37:24.660] I sent a complaint to the secretary of state and then I took a full copy of that complaint
[37:24.660 --> 37:36.600] and then I mailed it in as the topic document of the next bar grievance. And so she has
[37:36.600 --> 37:45.400] actually four now. Most recently, when I called in last week, I was about to go down and file
[37:45.400 --> 37:55.440] a criminal charge against this attorney for violating Texas People Code 32.49, which is
[37:55.440 --> 38:02.880] refusal to execute or release fraudulent lien or claim. And I gave her the 21-day period
[38:02.880 --> 38:14.960] for that. Wait a minute. You said 50.49. 32.49. Oh, I'm sorry. Well, I know better. But yeah,
[38:14.960 --> 38:23.320] 32.49. Wait, wait, wait, wait. 32 or 38. Brain dead. Brain dead. It's 49 something, but it's
[38:23.320 --> 38:35.520] not 50. What is 30? I think it's 32.49. Yes, it is. Yeah. And so I gave her the 21 days.
[38:35.520 --> 38:41.560] She didn't remove it. So I checked with the courthouse, you know, before going to the
[38:41.560 --> 38:46.320] police station to file it and make sure that somehow it didn't get done. And I didn't know
[38:46.320 --> 38:52.440] about it, but it was still there. So then I went and last Friday afternoon and filed
[38:52.440 --> 38:59.840] a criminal charge against her. And I took the complaint up to the window. It was kind
[38:59.840 --> 39:08.000] of late in the afternoon. And so I gave it to the girl there at the front. And she said
[39:08.000 --> 39:13.760] she would go find the city attorney. The city attorney had already gone home. And anyway,
[39:13.760 --> 39:19.120] so she went ahead and took it anyway. And she stamped it and everything. And that was
[39:19.120 --> 39:27.400] it. And then so going through the week, well, earlier today, I was listening to one of your
[39:27.400 --> 39:34.560] episodes that is posted on YouTube, where you talk about actually the title of it is
[39:34.560 --> 39:41.120] something about how to file criminal complaints against public officials. And in that episode,
[39:41.120 --> 39:47.360] you give a very lengthy explanation of how the whole politics work. It was an episode
[39:47.360 --> 39:54.680] where you were talking about, you had a guest on talking about vaccines, and you give a
[39:54.680 --> 40:01.080] full explanation of how this whole political thing works and how you work it. And then
[40:01.080 --> 40:08.080] later today, just a couple hours ago, I was got to snooping around there on the internet.
[40:08.080 --> 40:18.360] And I found that this attorney is the Denton County Bar Association president.
[40:18.360 --> 40:22.400] Wait a minute. Denton County?
[40:22.400 --> 40:26.920] Denton County Bar Association president. Yes. I'm not kidding.
[40:26.920 --> 40:33.800] Let me tell you a little story about Denton County. A friend of mine got on the Sheriff's
[40:33.800 --> 40:40.280] Department in Wise County. But before she could work in the jail, she had to go to Denton
[40:40.280 --> 40:48.080] and take a course on how to deal with difficult people. And they used someone as an example,
[40:48.080 --> 40:58.200] me. She said, I know that guy. Denton County knows me really well.
[40:58.200 --> 41:05.120] Well, yeah, I know you don't live too far away. So I know you know the territory around
[41:05.120 --> 41:09.840] here. Yeah. So I thought, well,
[41:09.840 --> 41:18.540] She's the bar president of the Denton County Bar Association. Now she's getting bar grieved
[41:18.540 --> 41:27.060] into the Stone Age, to quote Scott, who's up next. Okay. So is anything percolated out
[41:27.060 --> 41:31.420] of that yet? Well, I just saw that. No, no, no one has
[41:31.420 --> 41:37.080] contacted me. The girl at the window, you know, she, she was nice, but she felt like
[41:37.080 --> 41:41.280] she was holding a hot potato, I think. And she was like, well, I want to give this to
[41:41.280 --> 41:45.440] the city attorney. Be sure your phone number is on here. So the city attorney can call
[41:45.440 --> 41:52.600] you, you know, and let nobody call me all week long. Not yet. Anyway, that was okay.
[41:52.600 --> 41:56.680] Since you gave it to the city attorney, let me tell you what I think is going to happen.
[41:56.680 --> 42:06.160] The city attorney is going to say that we only handle Class C misdemeanors. You have
[42:06.160 --> 42:15.380] to take this somewhere else. No, no, no, no. That's not what the code says. 2.03 Texas
[42:15.380 --> 42:21.560] Code of Criminal Procedure. It does not say when a district attorney or county attorney
[42:21.560 --> 42:33.720] or municipal attorney prosecutor, it says when a prosecutor has it made known to him
[42:33.720 --> 42:39.440] that a public official is violated law under his office, he shall present the complaint
[42:39.440 --> 42:45.400] to some magistrate and forward to reduce the complaint to information and submit it to
[42:45.400 --> 42:53.200] the grand jury. Prosecutor, not municipal, and it didn't say what kind of prosecutor.
[42:53.200 --> 42:59.680] And if they intended district attorney, they would have said so, but they didn't. The legislature
[42:59.680 --> 43:03.600] did not. So that's his hot potato.
[43:03.600 --> 43:10.760] Okay. Now, where can I read up on that again? What's the code for that?
[43:10.760 --> 43:19.640] 2.03 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Right up there at the front, the very first statute
[43:19.640 --> 43:27.560] that tells a prosecutor something he must do. 2.01 says it shall be the primary duty
[43:27.560 --> 43:34.880] of the prosecuting attorney not to secure conviction. He shall not seek witnesses or
[43:34.880 --> 43:39.720] evidence that will show the innocence of the accused and mitigate the guilt of the accused.
[43:39.720 --> 43:44.960] That's nice high-minded rhetoric, but it's really not very specific on what he needs
[43:44.960 --> 43:45.960] to do.
[43:45.960 --> 43:53.000] Oh, 2.02 says prosecutor handles this stuff. I mean, district handles this, county handles
[43:53.000 --> 44:01.280] this. 2.03, the first one when a prosecuting attorney is made known to him that he shall
[44:01.280 --> 44:02.280] not secure conviction.
[44:02.280 --> 44:07.960] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by
[44:07.960 --> 44:13.360] our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas behind Brave New Books
[44:13.360 --> 44:18.240] and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.240 --> 44:22.640] Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.640 --> 44:26.720] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Emu oil,
[44:26.720 --> 44:34.760] lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find
[44:34.760 --> 44:43.200] us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. Don't
[44:43.200 --> 45:01.280] forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.280 --> 45:07.720] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.720 --> 45:14.400] the affordable, easy to understand, 4CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by
[45:14.400 --> 45:20.080] step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have
[45:20.080 --> 45:26.320] a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course,
[45:26.320 --> 45:32.960] and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[45:32.960 --> 45:38.360] winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.360 --> 45:44.120] understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[45:44.120 --> 45:51.520] our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and
[45:51.520 --> 45:57.640] much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free
[45:57.640 --> 46:27.480] 866-LAW-EASY.
[46:27.480 --> 46:31.840] Okay we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Boris
[46:31.840 --> 46:40.320] in Texas. I kind of run off the cliff there again. 2.03 Code of Criminal Procedure. A
[46:40.320 --> 46:44.840] prosecuting attorney in the matter of a criminal complaint against a public official has zero
[46:44.840 --> 46:49.480] discretion. He must give it to the grand jury.
[46:49.480 --> 46:57.600] Okay. Yeah. Now that you mentioned that the girl at the window, she did ask about that.
[46:57.600 --> 47:04.200] She said, is this class C misdemeanor? And I said, no, it's class A. And she goes, oh,
[47:04.200 --> 47:07.600] that usually goes to the county. And then that's when she said, well, let me go see
[47:07.600 --> 47:13.480] if the city attorney is still here. And she got up and took off. And it was nearly four
[47:13.480 --> 47:18.040] o'clock on Fridays, so most people had already gone home. And she came back a few minutes
[47:18.040 --> 47:23.800] later and she's like, well, the city attorney's already left and I'll go ahead and take it.
[47:23.800 --> 47:28.280] So do I need to check up on that pretty soon to see what they've done?
[47:28.280 --> 47:31.400] Oh, yeah. She's going to get chewed out about that.
[47:31.400 --> 47:37.340] Nothing about taking, about doing her job.
[47:37.340 --> 47:43.660] She did the right thing. That was her job. She's not a lawyer and she's not there to
[47:43.660 --> 47:48.600] decide what can be filed and what can't. If the lawyer don't have a problem with it, he
[47:48.600 --> 47:55.280] can deal with it. So now you bar grieve the lawyer for not, you might even file obstruction
[47:55.280 --> 47:56.880] of justice against him.
[47:56.880 --> 48:04.240] Well, now I don't know what's happened yet, but I guess any day now, maybe tomorrow, did
[48:04.240 --> 48:06.360] I go in there and see what they've done?
[48:06.360 --> 48:07.360] Yes.
[48:07.360 --> 48:13.640] Just go in and ask and just say, hey, I want to see how that complaint's coming along.
[48:13.640 --> 48:20.080] Well, you ask them what magistrate did you send the complaint to?
[48:20.080 --> 48:27.280] Okay, right. What magistrate did you send the complaint to? Sure. Does the city attorney,
[48:27.280 --> 48:31.760] if she gave it to the city attorney, that's not a magistrate though, is it?
[48:31.760 --> 48:38.920] No, he's not a magistrate. He is supposed to send it to a magistrate. 2.05, I think.
[48:38.920 --> 48:39.920] 2.05.
[48:39.920 --> 48:46.400] It's all right there in the front, not way in the back. Just the first four or five,
[48:46.400 --> 48:57.840] 2.03 through 2.06, read those. See, 2.04, 5, and 6 is your standard criminal process.
[48:57.840 --> 49:06.720] 2.03 is a separate process specifically for public officials. It stands out from the normal
[49:06.720 --> 49:13.040] process. It's a special statute and therefore takes precedence over general statutes. It's
[49:13.040 --> 49:16.160] special in that it's specific to public officials.
[49:16.160 --> 49:27.440] Okay. Okay, good. Okay. Well, I was also thinking of if there's a criminal complaint there for
[49:27.440 --> 49:31.080] the notarization because this one-
[49:31.080 --> 49:34.960] Oh, there's definitely one for that.
[49:34.960 --> 49:37.680] Would that be in the 32.46?
[49:37.680 --> 49:46.160] No, that would be 37.10 tampering with the government document.
[49:46.160 --> 49:53.440] Yeah. And on the part of the attorney or-
[49:53.440 --> 49:56.680] The attorney and the notary.
[49:56.680 --> 50:04.040] Right. So at what point did it become a government document?
[50:04.040 --> 50:12.360] When it was filed, they filed it with the county recorder's office. It became a government
[50:12.360 --> 50:15.080] document when they did that.
[50:15.080 --> 50:22.600] Yeah. And the tampering, was that just because of the bad notarization or-
[50:22.600 --> 50:32.440] Yes, the bad notarization. They committed a crime. She's forbidden by statute to notarize
[50:32.440 --> 50:40.440] her own documents. And you can move, you should file a quiet title action against the last
[50:40.440 --> 50:46.360] pendants to have it removed from the record because it was improperly filed.
[50:46.360 --> 50:57.240] Yeah. Well, okay. I need to figure out how to do that. But yeah. Okay.
[50:57.240 --> 51:10.040] Look under Texas government code, I'm sorry, local government code 51903. 51901C we talked
[51:10.040 --> 51:18.600] about the other day. 51903 has the form for quiet title in the statute.
[51:18.600 --> 51:24.880] Okay. 51903 for quiet title. Okay.
[51:24.880 --> 51:30.440] It shows you how to structure it and you just tell them they filed this document and the
[51:30.440 --> 51:42.000] person who affirmed it also acknowledged it. Affirmation means you sign a document. Acknowledge
[51:42.000 --> 51:48.120] means you notarize the document. It can't be both the same person. So the document doesn't
[51:48.120 --> 51:53.800] meet the statutory filing requirements and you ask the court to remove it.
[51:53.800 --> 51:59.280] Okay. You got a great suit against them for filing
[51:59.280 --> 52:05.440] that fraudulent document. Yeah. I was thinking, you know, cause I was
[52:05.440 --> 52:13.560] kind of looking around through all those codes and 32.46 is securing execution of document
[52:13.560 --> 52:19.200] by deception, which I thought looked like it probably fits. But if the one that you
[52:19.200 --> 52:27.440] mentioned is better, then I want to use the one that's better. Are you familiar with 32.46?
[52:27.440 --> 52:38.960] Vaguely. That's the one. If I remember that one right, it goes to literally to fraud in
[52:38.960 --> 52:48.680] filing the document. Let's see. This document wasn't, maybe it was fraudulently filed. I'd
[52:48.680 --> 52:55.880] have to read the codes carefully to decide which ones. Let me go to 32.46 and see if
[52:55.880 --> 53:08.720] I can find it. 46, Texas. Those are written for the Republic of Texas and they were trying
[53:08.720 --> 53:17.520] to stop them. Okay. Securing and execution of a document by deception. Make sure my page
[53:17.520 --> 53:29.160] is rolling around. It's not, there's some reason my screen is not folding up the document
[53:29.160 --> 53:33.040] so I can't, it's not wrapping the documents. Securing and execution of document by deception.
[53:33.040 --> 53:39.720] A person commits offense if with intent to defraud or harm any person, he by deception
[53:39.720 --> 53:46.320] causes another to sign or execute any document affecting service or the pecuniary interest
[53:46.320 --> 53:53.260] of any person or causes or induces a public servant to file or record any purported judgment
[53:53.260 --> 54:01.320] or other documents purporting to memorialize or evidence and act or other order a directive
[54:01.320 --> 54:08.680] or process of a purported court that is not expressly created or established. This really
[54:08.680 --> 54:15.400] went to some of the procedures the Republic of Texas was doing. Is they were bringing
[54:15.400 --> 54:23.520] documents that were totally fraudulent on their face and inducing the clerk to file
[54:23.520 --> 54:35.920] them. Well, this one's not for not a fraudulent document on its face. It is insufficient to
[54:35.920 --> 54:42.520] file on its face, but it's not fraud on its face. If they have they filed a suit against
[54:42.520 --> 54:53.440] the property? Well, it was the ex-wife filing suit against the ex-husband and the property
[54:53.440 --> 55:02.840] is mentioned in the suit. Not good enough. That makes it a fraudulent document. If they
[55:02.840 --> 55:08.840] don't have a claim against the property, the fact that they mentioned the property doesn't
[55:08.840 --> 55:14.680] give them a claim against the property. There has to be a claim against the property. They
[55:14.680 --> 55:21.640] would have either had to have named you as the owner or filed in rim a suit against the
[55:21.640 --> 55:26.480] property itself. They didn't do either one of those. There's no claim against your property
[55:26.480 --> 55:37.340] and the documents fraudulent outright. Right. So what it is, it's called original petition
[55:37.340 --> 55:44.720] for post divorce settlement of whatever division of property is what something like that. What
[55:44.720 --> 55:52.080] is what it's called? And it mentions my address in it. And and then they're trying to get,
[55:52.080 --> 55:59.400] they're trying to get the ex-husband to pay for like half of the Zillow value, which is.
[55:59.400 --> 56:07.000] This makes no claim against your property. I suspect that this woman works for this lawyer
[56:07.000 --> 56:12.080] and because she works for the lawyer, she got the lawyer to do something that that's
[56:12.080 --> 56:22.200] out out of the lawyer's area of expertise. Yeah. She's making some important technical
[56:22.200 --> 56:32.520] blunders. Yeah. Yeah. And we looked up her notarization address and the notar the notary
[56:32.520 --> 56:38.560] public address business address is exactly the same as the attorney's address. Exactly
[56:38.560 --> 56:47.480] the same. Well, that, that can happen. Okay. She can notarize documents for this attorney
[56:47.480 --> 56:54.880] when she works for the attorney. Sure. Yeah. But you can't notarize her own documents.
[56:54.880 --> 57:06.680] Yeah. It was a serious blunder. Well, but, but more serious than that, that was more
[57:06.680 --> 57:13.960] of an oversight. And the courts will look at that as an oversight. The real problem
[57:13.960 --> 57:19.640] is, is this lawyer filed a less dependence against your property and stopped you from
[57:19.640 --> 57:28.780] selling your property because the husband receiving payment from this property hadn't
[57:28.780 --> 57:33.800] given it to the wife. That don't have anything to do with you. Doesn't have anything to do
[57:33.800 --> 57:41.300] with your property. No, they don't have grounds for less dependence. No. And then they make
[57:41.300 --> 57:47.040] no acknowledgement of the contract for deed. I mean, they just, they don't say that I'm
[57:47.040 --> 57:51.880] going to be faulted. They don't argue how much is owed. They just make a no acknowledgement
[57:51.880 --> 57:58.560] whatsoever that it even exists. They just kind of go run right along as it was his house
[57:58.560 --> 58:03.320] and they're trying to get money out of him. And I think this lawyer doesn't know what
[58:03.320 --> 58:23.360] she's doing. She's blundered seriously. Lawyers tend to have areas of practice. Yeah. So this
[58:23.360 --> 58:30.480] is almost certainly out of her area of practice. A real estate attorney would know better than
[58:30.480 --> 58:37.280] to file a less pendants unless they had a real claim against the property. This lawyer
[58:37.280 --> 58:44.920] has a problem. Yeah. Yeah. She may not be the president of the bar association next
[58:44.920 --> 58:54.120] year when you get done with her. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:54.120 --> 58:59.480] Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations
[58:59.480 --> 59:05.220] try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning
[59:05.220 --> 59:12.280] of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful
[59:12.280 --> 59:18.640] and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult
[59:18.640 --> 59:24.340] and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches
[59:24.340 --> 59:29.960] of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give
[59:29.960 --> 59:35.720] you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study
[59:35.720 --> 59:45.560] Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at
[59:45.560 --> 59:55.320] freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[59:55.320 --> 01:00:05.640] at logosradionetwork.com. The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:05.640 --> 01:00:12.320] Markets for Monday, the 12th of June, 2017, closed with gold at $1,265.96 an ounce, silver
[01:00:12.320 --> 01:00:22.120] $16.95 an ounce, Texas crude $45.83 a barrel, and Bitcoin is sitting at about 2,683 U.S.
[01:00:22.120 --> 01:00:30.920] currency. Today in history, the year 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia
[01:00:30.920 --> 01:00:36.940] declares all U.S. state laws which prohibit interracial marriage to be unconstitutional.
[01:00:36.940 --> 01:00:44.920] Today in history. In recent news, British Prime Minister Theresa May, who stayed in
[01:00:44.920 --> 01:00:48.760] as Prime Minister after Thursday's election last week, will be meeting newly elected French
[01:00:48.760 --> 01:00:53.760] President Emmanuel Macron to focus, as May's spokesperson has revealed, along with company
[01:00:53.760 --> 01:00:58.560] reps on counter-terrorism and dealing with online extremism. This meeting most likely
[01:00:58.560 --> 01:01:02.200] scheduled in response after the two terror attacks, one in Manchester and the other in
[01:01:02.200 --> 01:01:06.960] London, which resulted in the 30 souls murdered. According to Theresa May's office, she is
[01:01:06.960 --> 01:01:11.400] said to read the following statement in her speech, quote, the counter-terrorism cooperation
[01:01:11.400 --> 01:01:15.720] between British and French intelligence agencies is already strong, but President Macron and
[01:01:15.720 --> 01:01:20.480] I agree that more should be done to tackle the terrorist threat online. We need to encourage
[01:01:20.480 --> 01:01:25.560] corporations to do more to abide by their social responsibility. With the speech potentially
[01:01:25.560 --> 01:01:31.000] containing a call in, quote, creating new legal liability for tech companies if they
[01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:36.680] fail to remove unacceptable content. It seems that the recent G7 meeting has commenced its
[01:01:36.680 --> 01:01:42.280] campaign to sell the agenda of fighting online extremism by further controlling and monitoring
[01:01:42.280 --> 01:01:47.400] the online content of the taxpaying citizenry.
[01:01:47.400 --> 01:01:55.060] Thirty-year-old Shiite Muslim Daimur Raza was found guilty and sentenced to death on
[01:01:55.060 --> 01:02:02.520] Saturday in an anti-terrorism Pakistani court by Judge Bashir Ahmed in the Punjab province
[01:02:02.520 --> 01:02:07.600] for blasphemy against Mohammed, the founder of Islam, being accused of saying derogatory
[01:02:07.600 --> 01:02:13.400] statements about the self-proclaimed prophet to his wives and others on Facebook and WhatsApp.
[01:02:13.400 --> 01:02:17.140] Apparently this is the first documented case anyone has been given the death penalty for
[01:02:17.140 --> 01:02:23.000] blasphemy on social media in Pakistan. Mohammed Shafi Qureshi, the prosecutor in the case,
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:27.120] stated that, quote, the forensic report of his mobile phone showed that he had committed
[01:02:27.120 --> 01:02:32.120] blasphemy in at least 3,000 posts. This new protocol seems to be right in line with the
[01:02:32.120 --> 01:02:37.680] interior minister of Pakistan who asked Facebook to identify people suspected of committing
[01:02:37.680 --> 01:02:41.680] blasphemy so that they could be prosecuted.
[01:02:41.680 --> 01:02:45.680] The Lone Star Lowdown is prevalent for sponsors. If you have a client or a service you'd like
[01:02:45.680 --> 01:02:53.200] to advertise with us, feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. This was Rick Rodey
[01:02:53.200 --> 01:03:19.840] with your Lowdown for June 12, 2017.
[01:03:23.200 --> 01:03:41.320] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens of Rule of Law Radio. And Boris, you may have
[01:03:41.320 --> 01:03:47.800] a better claim than I anticipated. I know you spoke to this lawsuit earlier, but it
[01:03:47.800 --> 01:03:56.880] wasn't clear that there was no actual claim made against the property. The fact that the
[01:03:56.880 --> 01:04:04.440] husband was receiving income from this property, from the sale of the property, and in addressing
[01:04:04.440 --> 01:04:11.000] that income, they'd certainly have to mention the property. But that creates no claim against
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:24.920] the property. And less pendants means pending claim. She's got a problem. You might look
[01:04:24.920 --> 01:04:31.880] at the benefit of the bargain and the cost and the time that it's held you up. You might
[01:04:31.880 --> 01:04:44.000] file a suit against the lawyer, a malpractice suit. Oh, I was wondering why you were so
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:51.800] quiet somebody left you muted. Okay, go ahead. Okay, well, I had not been talking anyway,
[01:04:51.800 --> 01:05:00.120] but yeah, well, I'm trying to learn all these things as quickly as possible. And, well,
[01:05:00.120 --> 01:05:06.720] for now, I know you got other callers and all. Let me pin down once and for all the
[01:05:06.720 --> 01:05:14.360] criminal complaint and I'll go with that. Did you like the tampering with the government
[01:05:14.360 --> 01:05:23.800] document one better? Yes, yes. I think that's exactly dead on. Tampering doesn't matter
[01:05:23.800 --> 01:05:31.480] why they did it wrong. Does it matter if they were trying to defraud somebody or not? They
[01:05:31.480 --> 01:05:37.440] put a false statement on a government document and the false statement was the notarization.
[01:05:37.440 --> 01:05:47.920] And that makes it a tampering? Yes. Okay. Okay. And that is in the code for that is?
[01:05:47.920 --> 01:05:58.080] 37.10. 37.10. Okay. Okay. And then if the city is, if the girl gave it to the city attorney
[01:05:58.080 --> 01:06:04.520] and if he just trashed it and if he did not give it to a magistrate properly, then obstructions
[01:06:04.520 --> 01:06:12.480] for justice and a bar grievance for him? Yep. Okay. Okay. This is all about politics. He's
[01:06:12.480 --> 01:06:16.840] going to say, I don't have anything to do with this nonsense and now I'm getting in
[01:06:16.840 --> 01:06:23.960] trouble. Now, especially if it's the president of the bar, it's going to get real ugly around
[01:06:23.960 --> 01:06:30.600] there. Yeah. Well, I thought that would give us some added leverage, you know, that sees
[01:06:30.600 --> 01:06:36.880] high up on a pedestal around here. So yeah, this stuff really gets around. I know when
[01:06:36.880 --> 01:06:46.240] I filed a $11 million lawsuit against Denton County and I sued my worst nightmare, that's
[01:06:46.240 --> 01:06:56.480] probably where they got this thing that I'm a difficult person because the guy was standing
[01:06:56.480 --> 01:07:03.320] up over me, shouting at me and I said, who the heck are you? He said, I'm your worst
[01:07:03.320 --> 01:07:11.240] nightmare. Oh, you're my nightmare. You know what my nightmares are. I tell you what, you
[01:07:11.240 --> 01:07:14.520] need to get, that didn't work out. So that didn't come off so good. So what you need
[01:07:14.520 --> 01:07:20.200] to do is get you a rag and tie it around your head and kind of drop your lip down and say,
[01:07:20.200 --> 01:07:23.680] I'm your worst nightmare.
[01:07:23.680 --> 01:07:32.000] And then nobody would tell me who he was. The sheriff, the major of the sheriff's department,
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:37.040] two or three captains, a couple of lieutenants, I arrest all of them. None of them would tell
[01:07:37.040 --> 01:07:42.760] me who he was. So when I sued, I sued my worst nightmare.
[01:07:42.760 --> 01:07:53.440] And I have the minutes of the court where the judge, David Army, asked the prosecutor,
[01:07:53.440 --> 01:08:00.560] who is this my worst nightmare? And the prosecutor said, apparently someone identified himself
[01:08:00.560 --> 01:08:08.500] to Mr. Kelton as his worst nightmare. And the judge said, yes, and I have a bone to
[01:08:08.500 --> 01:08:12.040] pick with him.
[01:08:12.040 --> 01:08:19.480] That was exactly why I did it. You want to play hardball? I'll introduce you to a little
[01:08:19.480 --> 01:08:28.520] politics. But anyway, I would definitely look at suing that lawyer. This is a really bonehead
[01:08:28.520 --> 01:08:36.440] move. And I have no doubt that the lawyer just didn't know what she was doing.
[01:08:36.440 --> 01:08:46.000] Well, okay, but if she realized that, she could have dissed it already. I mean, if she
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:50.880] knows better, then why doesn't she bail out? Why doesn't she want to just go down with
[01:08:50.880 --> 01:08:53.240] the ship, so to speak?
[01:08:53.240 --> 01:08:59.560] I have no idea why people, they do something really stupid and they just seem to have to
[01:08:59.560 --> 01:09:08.680] bury themselves in it. And the thing about lawyers is they're learned counsel. And they
[01:09:08.680 --> 01:09:15.400] have to put on this show of always knowing the answers. They can't be seen to be showed
[01:09:15.400 --> 01:09:17.240] up by a pro se.
[01:09:17.240 --> 01:09:24.040] Yeah, they can't say I was wrong. They just can't say that.
[01:09:24.040 --> 01:09:29.560] Yeah, they literally cannot. They can't afford to be wrong because you can be wrong, but
[01:09:29.560 --> 01:09:35.000] you're not learned counsel. You're not there standing on your bar cart or dangling by your
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:37.040] bar cart. She is.
[01:09:37.040 --> 01:09:38.040] Yeah.
[01:09:38.040 --> 01:09:39.040] Okay, so-
[01:09:39.040 --> 01:09:40.040] Okay.
[01:09:40.040 --> 01:09:49.000] Look at filing tampering against the lawyer. That's really going to get her excited.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:51.880] Yeah, hopefully the-
[01:09:51.880 --> 01:09:59.160] If you will use the forms, I've got juris imprudence.website up and working. If you'll
[01:09:59.160 --> 01:10:07.640] go on there and pull the criminal form I have on there, you file it with that format. They
[01:10:07.640 --> 01:10:11.600] will take one look at it and they'll know exactly where that came from.
[01:10:11.600 --> 01:10:15.000] Okay. And the jurisprudence.website?
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:18.680] Yeah. It's imprudence.
[01:10:18.680 --> 01:10:22.120] Yes, juris imprudence.
[01:10:22.120 --> 01:10:28.280] Juris imprudence, yeah. Okay. Is that it, Boris?
[01:10:28.280 --> 01:10:31.760] Thank you very much. Yes, that's good. Thank you.
[01:10:31.760 --> 01:10:36.680] Thank you, Boris. Now we're going to Scott in Texas. Hello, Scott.
[01:10:36.680 --> 01:10:38.600] Howdy, howdy.
[01:10:38.600 --> 01:10:46.920] Okay. How did your little trip to court this week work out for you?
[01:10:46.920 --> 01:10:56.680] Well, the website is officially up and running, so all of you can go to the website, traffictakers.website,
[01:10:56.680 --> 01:11:04.720] fill out all the information on there, and then hit print and go get you enough paperwork
[01:11:04.720 --> 01:11:11.920] to choke a horse, and then go in there and submit it. What I did is I turned in the special
[01:11:11.920 --> 01:11:18.880] appearance and I created a motion for dismissal with prejudice, and I sent it over to you
[01:11:18.880 --> 01:11:26.640] so you can upload that for anybody that has submitted directly to jail. This goes straight
[01:11:26.640 --> 01:11:35.320] into the examining trial, which they never give anybody. So, I created that motion and
[01:11:35.320 --> 01:11:43.440] tied in a bunch of exhibits, because I did an information request to the BTS, found out
[01:11:43.440 --> 01:11:52.800] there is not one cop, county or municipal, in Range County, that has the authority to
[01:11:52.800 --> 01:12:00.800] pull you over and rock you a ticket. So, I asked all them as a exhibit, and then so as
[01:12:00.800 --> 01:12:07.720] soon as they called me up pretty much first, I mean, they came up to me with a little bit
[01:12:07.720 --> 01:12:13.600] of something, because I did a 17.30 on them, and when I got there, they immediately said,
[01:12:13.600 --> 01:12:19.240] Mr. Richardson, I'm going to get a, here's your response to the 17.30, which was non-responsive
[01:12:19.240 --> 01:12:25.360] of course. Okay, hold on, hold on. 17.30. What it says
[01:12:25.360 --> 01:12:34.900] is, is that when a magistrate finishes an examining trial, he shall seal all documents
[01:12:34.900 --> 01:12:41.640] had in the hearing. The statement of the accused, the statement of witnesses, if any, and all
[01:12:41.640 --> 01:12:47.800] other documents had in the hearing, shall be sealed up in an envelope with the name
[01:12:47.800 --> 01:12:53.400] of the magistrate written across the seal of the envelope and forwarded to the clerk
[01:12:53.400 --> 01:13:00.680] at the court of jurisdiction. So, I have a 17.30 request, and what I ask for is that
[01:13:00.680 --> 01:13:09.520] envelope and the documents that came in it. I was in Victoria, Texas, and trying to get
[01:13:09.520 --> 01:13:13.840] some of these records, and the prosecutor said, well, you'll have to ask for that
[01:13:13.840 --> 01:13:20.400] in writing. So, I take out one of my 17.30s, and I put in the dates from this date to this
[01:13:20.400 --> 01:13:24.480] date, and I signed it and handed it to him. And he's standing there reading it. He reads
[01:13:24.480 --> 01:13:28.480] a little through it, and he looked down at me, and he reads a little more, and he looked
[01:13:28.480 --> 01:13:34.960] down at me again. And the third time he looked down at me, I said, and you thought this was
[01:13:34.960 --> 01:13:44.360] my first rodeo. No, Mr. Kelton, somehow I get the idea this is not your first rodeo.
[01:13:44.360 --> 01:13:54.240] 17.30 is a great one because the statute is very clear, and they will have no records
[01:13:54.240 --> 01:14:01.360] responsive to your request. If they have no records responsive to your request, that means
[01:14:01.360 --> 01:14:05.800] they don't have what kind of order, Scott?
[01:14:05.800 --> 01:14:20.680] They don't have, and I'm having a binging lot. Tell everybody what the order is. Hello?
[01:14:20.680 --> 01:14:35.040] Are you there? Well, the order is going to basically have, it's going to basically say
[01:14:35.040 --> 01:14:41.760] that you've been charged with something, and the order is going to tell you that this is
[01:14:41.760 --> 01:14:48.120] why they put you in jail. Well, they don't have any of that. So since they don't have
[01:14:48.120 --> 01:14:56.000] any of that, they didn't have an examining file, which is illegal. So when I first sat
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:04.600] down, the little prosecutor female, she was reading me the right act about here's a deal
[01:15:04.600 --> 01:15:09.520] that we're going to cut you, and as soon as she got done talking, I told her, I said,
[01:15:09.520 --> 01:15:15.640] well, I'm here in special appearance. Arms went to the court, and here's my special appearance.
[01:15:15.640 --> 01:15:21.360] Here's a copy for you. Here's a copy for the judge. I also have a motion to dismiss with
[01:15:21.360 --> 01:15:27.760] prejudice. Here's a copy for you and a copy for the judge. Since she saw that stuff, everything
[01:15:27.760 --> 01:15:34.960] stopped. She was, oh, well, I'm going to have to give this to the judge, and he's going
[01:15:34.960 --> 01:15:40.040] to have to review this. We're going to have to reset this. She just didn't know what to
[01:15:40.040 --> 01:15:48.240] do. She'd never seen anything like that before. So after we sat there for a few minutes, maybe
[01:15:48.240 --> 01:15:55.160] kind of looking a little goofy, then the young bitch was actually listening to me talk, and
[01:15:55.160 --> 01:16:02.360] you could see him just almost kind of smirking, because I caught a glimpse of him smirking,
[01:16:02.360 --> 01:16:07.440] and then he just looked back down and just pretended like he didn't see nothing, but
[01:16:07.440 --> 01:16:13.360] I was talking really quiet, so anybody that was wanting to hear, they had restrained here
[01:16:13.360 --> 01:16:20.400] what I was saying, and a couple of the older clerk's ladies, they were just scowling. Oh,
[01:16:20.400 --> 01:16:29.960] my gosh. It was, they were, they look like if they couldn't hear me. Okay. Yeah. So what
[01:16:29.960 --> 01:16:39.840] was the order exactly at the top? I forgot. I can't hear you. Well, we're going to break.
[01:16:39.840 --> 01:17:00.120] I'll go to traffic ticket, sign up, tell everybody about it, and we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.120 --> 01:17:15.920] I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm
[01:17:15.920 --> 01:17:30.520] not going to give up, and I really don't have any money to give, because I spend it all
[01:17:30.520 --> 01:17:41.520] on supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything
[01:17:41.520 --> 01:17:46.520] logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do I have to do anything different when I
[01:17:46.520 --> 01:17:53.040] order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow, giving without doing anything
[01:17:53.040 --> 01:17:59.400] or spending any money, this is perfect. Thank you so much. You're welcome. Happy holidays,
[01:17:59.400 --> 01:18:08.640] logos. It's the 2017 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser, sponsored by Central Texas Gunworks,
[01:18:08.640 --> 01:18:14.160] Defense Distributed and Fat Sal's Deli. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:18:14.160 --> 01:18:19.320] Every $25 donation is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gunworks, first place up for
[01:18:19.320 --> 01:18:26.880] grabs, a Spike's Tactical AR-15. Second place, Taurus PT-111 G2 9mm pistol. From Defense
[01:18:26.880 --> 01:18:34.120] Distributed, third place, the AR-308 80% lower. Fourth place, the AR-15 80% lower. From Fat
[01:18:34.120 --> 01:18:40.040] Sal's Deli, fifth place, $100 gift card. From Fat Sal's Deli, every $25 donation is a chance
[01:18:40.040 --> 01:18:45.760] to win. That's logosradionetwork.com. Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's eBook, Legal
[01:18:45.760 --> 01:18:50.960] 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar, get 10 chances
[01:18:50.960 --> 01:18:57.000] to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to logosradionetwork.com
[01:18:57.000 --> 01:19:04.000] for details and donate today.
[01:19:27.000 --> 01:19:48.360] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and talking to
[01:19:48.360 --> 01:19:53.720] Scott from Texas. Scott, can you hear me now? Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now?
[01:19:53.720 --> 01:20:00.260] I hear you, clear. Okay, don't know what went on. I didn't lose my connection. Just my voice
[01:20:00.260 --> 01:20:09.320] faded for some reason. Okay, nice outro. You did good. For a chomp. Okay. Hey, you know,
[01:20:09.320 --> 01:20:20.920] we're better. Okay, so back to at the, at the little hearing. So now the judge called
[01:20:20.920 --> 01:20:31.400] me in there for a hearing, which is nondescriptive. So they didn't tell me if it was for an arraignment
[01:20:31.400 --> 01:20:37.600] or a motion hearing or anything. So I, now I've got some criminal charges on the judge
[01:20:37.600 --> 01:20:45.240] for simulating a legal process. Also, the come up, I t-closed Tim probably about two
[01:20:45.240 --> 01:20:53.480] months to three months ago or something. We quit. So I've seen information requests for
[01:20:53.480 --> 01:21:00.200] the city of Tawakanese authority to enforce traffic. They failed to answer the first one.
[01:21:00.200 --> 01:21:07.000] So I wrote them again and said, okay, this is my second request. I'm also going to carbon
[01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:13.640] copy the attorney general on this. Well, they never answered the second one either. So now
[01:21:13.640 --> 01:21:20.800] I've got criminal charges on the mayor and chief of police. I'm going to submit those
[01:21:20.800 --> 01:21:26.320] to the grand jury of rain County. I called today and they convened at the end of the
[01:21:26.320 --> 01:21:33.960] month. So they'll have charges on the County judge chief of police and the mayor of East
[01:21:33.960 --> 01:21:40.560] Tawakanese. So I guess they'll get real interested in about a month when I have to go back and
[01:21:40.560 --> 01:21:44.280] they're going to be having to stare at my face again.
[01:21:44.280 --> 01:21:51.160] Yeah, that should get interesting, especially when you start filing against the mayor. He
[01:21:51.160 --> 01:21:58.440] is not going to be a happy camper. Oh, it's a female. Yeah. She's going to really
[01:21:58.440 --> 01:22:05.640] like this one because I, you know, they, that cop is already gone. So they are getting drug
[01:22:05.640 --> 01:22:14.720] all off into this. The motion that I've got created is all it is air tight. They're going
[01:22:14.720 --> 01:22:22.360] to, when they read this thing, they're going to see Kate's law on Xbox. They go with the
[01:22:22.360 --> 01:22:28.800] good theme to you. And that other case, I keep forgetting, which will the name of it.
[01:22:28.800 --> 01:22:38.200] Keith Boyd. He's Boyd. So what I did is I printed off the whole cases and I attached
[01:22:38.200 --> 01:22:45.480] those exhibits as well. So this was really only about a six page motion, but by the time
[01:22:45.480 --> 01:22:52.040] I tied in all the exhibits, it was probably about 50 pieces. So it looks like a little
[01:22:52.040 --> 01:22:57.400] meaty book. And so I'm just taking the book and throwing it right back in there. And they're
[01:22:57.400 --> 01:23:03.200] going to have a real struggle with this. And this is going to be emotions. Like I say,
[01:23:03.200 --> 01:23:09.080] I send it to you so it can be implemented into the website. So for everybody that went
[01:23:09.080 --> 01:23:13.360] straight to jail, this is going to be another one of the things that's going to help you
[01:23:13.360 --> 01:23:20.560] all out. Good. And this is what we're going to be doing in these next few months is now
[01:23:20.560 --> 01:23:29.880] we're growing the electronic lawyer. He creates the first set of documents and then we take
[01:23:29.880 --> 01:23:37.380] all of these different ways of responding. We set up a questionnaire for each to incorporate
[01:23:37.380 --> 01:23:44.200] all of these different issues that come about. And then the electronic lawyer will start
[01:23:44.200 --> 01:23:51.040] spitting out these documents based on the way you answer the question. So we're getting
[01:23:51.040 --> 01:23:59.080] our electronic lawyer up and working and this traffic issue will prove it out for us. Okay,
[01:23:59.080 --> 01:24:03.160] Scott, you did good for a chump.
[01:24:03.160 --> 01:24:12.200] Hey, I'm getting better at this. I got good teachers. I'll let you get to the next dollar.
[01:24:12.200 --> 01:24:22.200] Okay, thank you, Scott. Okay, now we're going to windy in Colorado. Hello, windy. Hello,
[01:24:22.200 --> 01:24:23.200] you're on the air.
[01:24:23.200 --> 01:24:24.200] Hi, Randy.
[01:24:24.200 --> 01:24:28.600] Hello, what do you have for us today?
[01:24:28.600 --> 01:24:33.800] I was just wondering if you want did you receive those in that email I sent you with all the
[01:24:33.800 --> 01:24:36.880] Colorado status on it?
[01:24:36.880 --> 01:24:43.960] Yes, I did. But I did not have time to sort all those out. This last two or three weeks
[01:24:43.960 --> 01:24:50.820] have been a major crunch getting this website up and working and all the documentation in
[01:24:50.820 --> 01:24:57.200] place have frankly fell behind on several projects that I'm supposed to be keeping up
[01:24:57.200 --> 01:25:02.160] with. So no, I didn't have time to go through all of those.
[01:25:02.160 --> 01:25:06.040] What is the website that you have going on so I can check it out?
[01:25:06.040 --> 01:25:17.480] It is traffic ticket dot website. Now, it's primarily for Texas, but a lot of these documents
[01:25:17.480 --> 01:25:23.960] are good wherever you file them. And so if you go on there, if you take your last ticket
[01:25:23.960 --> 01:25:29.140] and fill it out, I'll merge it and send it to you.
[01:25:29.140 --> 01:25:35.060] It's not exactly appropriate or not all of it's appropriate to Colorado, but some of
[01:25:35.060 --> 01:25:39.920] it will be. It'll give you some good idea about some documents and things you can file.
[01:25:39.920 --> 01:25:46.280] I'm looking in these for official oppression and all this stuff. And in these roles, it's
[01:25:46.280 --> 01:25:52.640] totally nothing like the Texas rules. They say everything is fine for the judge to do
[01:25:52.640 --> 01:25:56.420] or the police officers.
[01:25:56.420 --> 01:26:04.680] In my experience, Colorado is one of the least favorite states.
[01:26:04.680 --> 01:26:14.160] I'm telling you, it's all the laws just towards the police and everything. They change everything.
[01:26:14.160 --> 01:26:21.120] Well, no, I haven't. Do you have anything else? I didn't get time to go through it.
[01:26:21.120 --> 01:26:27.080] So I can't talk speak to the difference between the codes. But make sure it's one of the things
[01:26:27.080 --> 01:26:32.600] I'm moving toward because right now we're just doing Texas with this thing. But as soon
[01:26:32.600 --> 01:26:39.880] as we get it well grounded, then we'll start moving into other states and addressing their
[01:26:39.880 --> 01:26:41.440] laws.
[01:26:41.440 --> 01:26:49.440] We go after some specific things here in Texas, but every state has its issues that we can
[01:26:49.440 --> 01:27:00.040] utilize. It's really not so much about law as about the politics. And the politics is
[01:27:00.040 --> 01:27:07.200] like Cathy spoke to when she spoke earlier in the day about this driver running over
[01:27:07.200 --> 01:27:14.760] six people and they just gave him a ticket. It's just politics. They could make money
[01:27:14.760 --> 01:27:21.720] on the ticket. They won't make money prosecuting somebody. Somebody doesn't have any money.
[01:27:21.720 --> 01:27:26.440] So they didn't bother with it.
[01:27:26.440 --> 01:27:35.560] And then when they do prosecute, it's all about the money. Traffic is all about making
[01:27:35.560 --> 01:27:41.000] money. But the criminal side is all about saving money. They've got a budget to work
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:47.520] within, and they've got to adjudicate all these cases within that budget. So they don't
[01:27:47.520 --> 01:27:53.000] want you fighting too hard. And they're going to go to a lot of trouble to keep you from
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:59.280] fighting too hard. But that's why we like to do a lot of stuff on them on the front
[01:27:59.280 --> 01:28:11.360] end. Brady motion and in limiting motion, these are, the Brady motion is criminal discovery.
[01:28:11.360 --> 01:28:18.120] And in limiting motion are all of the questions that the lawyers, that the prosecutor can't
[01:28:18.120 --> 01:28:28.120] ask. Take them a lot of time to go through this and it'll sort of hamstring the prosecutor
[01:28:28.120 --> 01:28:34.080] and it tells him you're going to fight this case real hard. So if you don't want to go
[01:28:34.080 --> 01:28:38.560] to court, you need to make me a deal. I can't pass up.
[01:28:38.560 --> 01:28:45.880] What's the name of that complaint or whatever? It is traffic ticket dot website.
[01:28:45.880 --> 01:28:51.280] No, I tried to get on that and it doesn't, it just goes to traffic tickets like to look
[01:28:51.280 --> 01:29:02.400] up your traffic ticket. I've done it several times. So is it all lowercase or uppercase
[01:29:02.400 --> 01:29:25.200] or something? Hello? Hello?
[01:29:25.200 --> 01:29:50.860] Hello?
[01:29:50.860 --> 01:30:06.340] Jacob Boskov dreamed up the most sinister weapon he could think of, then he built a
[01:30:06.340 --> 01:30:10.400] prototype and tried to sell it in an international weapons trade show.
[01:30:10.400 --> 01:30:11.860] The results were surprising.
[01:30:11.860 --> 01:30:16.340] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you more in just a moment.
[01:30:16.340 --> 01:30:17.940] Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.940 --> 01:30:21.560] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.560 --> 01:30:26.340] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.340 --> 01:30:31.380] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.380 --> 01:30:34.100] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:30:34.100 --> 01:30:38.400] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:30:38.400 --> 01:30:41.940] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.940 --> 01:30:45.500] Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.500 --> 01:30:47.580] Governments can't be trusted with weapons.
[01:30:47.580 --> 01:30:52.180] That's what Danish artist Jacob Boskov discovered when he marketed a fake weapon called the
[01:30:52.180 --> 01:30:53.860] ID Sniper Rifle.
[01:30:53.860 --> 01:30:58.140] He claimed it would allow government agents to shoot microchip implants into people from
[01:30:58.140 --> 01:31:01.340] a distance and then secretly track them by satellite.
[01:31:01.340 --> 01:31:05.200] The chip was supposed to feel like a mosquito bite and leave no obvious marks.
[01:31:05.200 --> 01:31:10.100] It's a ridiculous notion, but government representatives from around the world bought the concept hook,
[01:31:10.100 --> 01:31:11.300] line, and sinker.
[01:31:11.300 --> 01:31:15.740] Reportedly, Chinese police were extremely interested, as were representatives from several
[01:31:15.740 --> 01:31:16.740] other countries.
[01:31:16.740 --> 01:31:20.140] Governments, they're always looking for new ways to stick it to you.
[01:31:20.140 --> 01:31:21.940] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:21.940 --> 01:31:30.500] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.500 --> 01:31:35.880] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:35.880 --> 01:31:38.460] The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.460 --> 01:31:42.940] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.940 --> 01:31:45.620] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.620 --> 01:31:48.380] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.380 --> 01:31:49.740] I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.740 --> 01:31:50.740] I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.740 --> 01:31:52.220] I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.220 --> 01:31:53.220] I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.220 --> 01:31:54.900] I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.900 --> 01:31:57.500] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.500 --> 01:31:59.700] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:31:59.700 --> 01:32:03.060] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.060 --> 01:32:06.060] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.060 --> 01:32:09.700] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[01:32:09.700 --> 01:32:10.700] them to pay for it.
[01:32:10.700 --> 01:32:14.260] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.260 --> 01:32:18.100] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.100 --> 01:32:20.860] you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:20.860 --> 01:32:21.860] And we accept bitcoin.
[01:32:21.860 --> 01:32:26.460] As a multi-year, A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints, you
[01:32:26.460 --> 01:32:30.800] can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:30.800 --> 01:32:31.880] first time.
[01:32:31.880 --> 01:32:40.540] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to HillCountryHomeImprovements.com, mention the crypto show, and get $100 off.
[01:32:40.540 --> 01:32:45.180] And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.180 --> 01:32:50.220] So if those out-of-town roofers come knockin', your door should be lockin'.
[01:32:50.220 --> 01:32:56.220] That's 512-992-8745 or HillCountryHomeImprovements.com.
[01:32:56.220 --> 01:32:58.580] Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.580 --> 01:33:00.740] May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:00.740 --> 01:33:11.540] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:30.740 --> 01:33:33.380] Okay.
[01:33:33.380 --> 01:33:34.380] We are back.
[01:33:34.380 --> 01:33:40.940] Brandy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Root Law Radio, and apologize for the technical difficulties.
[01:33:40.940 --> 01:33:44.700] I seem to be having some fading in and out.
[01:33:44.700 --> 01:33:47.420] We may have some weather moving in here.
[01:33:47.420 --> 01:33:48.420] Okay.
[01:33:48.420 --> 01:33:53.020] Wendy, where were we before I was so rudely interrupted?
[01:33:53.020 --> 01:33:54.300] No, you're fine.
[01:33:54.300 --> 01:33:59.300] Where I could go to get a criminal complaint, what site would I go to to find one of those
[01:33:59.300 --> 01:34:00.300] criminal complaints?
[01:34:00.300 --> 01:34:07.980] The criminal complaints, you'll find those on juris imprudence website, jurisimprudence.website.
[01:34:07.980 --> 01:34:08.980] Alrighty.
[01:34:08.980 --> 01:34:16.780] Well, that's about it then until I talk to you next time.
[01:34:16.780 --> 01:34:17.780] Alrighty.
[01:34:17.780 --> 01:34:18.780] Thank you, Wendy.
[01:34:18.780 --> 01:34:19.780] Thanks.
[01:34:19.780 --> 01:34:20.780] Bye.
[01:34:20.780 --> 01:34:21.780] Okay.
[01:34:21.780 --> 01:34:25.620] This is Brandy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Root Law Radio.
[01:34:25.620 --> 01:34:28.900] We have an empty board at the moment.
[01:34:28.900 --> 01:34:36.140] I call it number 512-646-1984, so if you have a question or comment, we've got two more
[01:34:36.140 --> 01:34:37.140] segments.
[01:34:37.140 --> 01:34:42.980] In the meantime, I'm going to go back to what we're doing with the traffic.
[01:34:42.980 --> 01:34:51.220] If you go on the website, I have pages that explain all the steps.
[01:34:51.220 --> 01:34:57.240] When you sign the ticket and agree to appear, you go down to the court and have you talk
[01:34:57.240 --> 01:35:02.560] to this clerk and the clerk wants you to give her a plea and that's all she wants.
[01:35:02.560 --> 01:35:04.260] She didn't want to do anything else.
[01:35:04.260 --> 01:35:12.260] I just went to JP with a ticket and laid a whole bunch of files up there and she started
[01:35:12.260 --> 01:35:15.420] not to take them.
[01:35:15.420 --> 01:35:22.440] That's how seldom it is that someone files anything in traffic cases.
[01:35:22.440 --> 01:35:27.780] They're used to just turning this crank and cranking everybody through it and everybody
[01:35:27.780 --> 01:35:32.860] doing exactly what they say when they say how they say.
[01:35:32.860 --> 01:35:37.300] When somebody comes along and does something different, they get real excited real fast.
[01:35:37.300 --> 01:35:42.860] So we tell people, don't argue with these folks.
[01:35:42.860 --> 01:35:47.220] These people are doing what they're trained to do and they're trained to herd you like
[01:35:47.220 --> 01:35:49.220] cattle.
[01:35:49.220 --> 01:35:55.780] They're trained to breach absolutely no interference of any kind.
[01:35:55.780 --> 01:36:00.460] They get real excited if you do anything out of the ordinary.
[01:36:00.460 --> 01:36:03.660] So try not to do too much out of the ordinary.
[01:36:03.660 --> 01:36:07.820] If they want to do it wrong, just let them.
[01:36:07.820 --> 01:36:12.860] If they want to impersonate a public official, let her.
[01:36:12.860 --> 01:36:13.940] You're not her lawyer.
[01:36:13.940 --> 01:36:16.380] You have no duty to give her legal advice.
[01:36:16.380 --> 01:36:18.920] Besides, she wouldn't listen to it anyway.
[01:36:18.920 --> 01:36:20.220] She's just treated as a threat.
[01:36:20.220 --> 01:36:26.740] So you go to the hearing, they demand a plea and I suggest you handle, hand them a special
[01:36:26.740 --> 01:36:27.740] pleading.
[01:36:27.740 --> 01:36:32.860] But if they insist that you enter a plea in the case and go ahead and tell them not guilty
[01:36:32.860 --> 01:36:38.420] or generally what I do is if they insist that they will, I'll just put in not guilty.
[01:36:38.420 --> 01:36:41.420] You can put in anything you want to, I don't care.
[01:36:41.420 --> 01:36:44.060] And they'll put in not guilty and go away.
[01:36:44.060 --> 01:36:52.700] And you go back on the website and we're building the questionnaire for you to go in
[01:36:52.700 --> 01:36:55.640] and say, we'll say did they do this, did they do this.
[01:36:55.640 --> 01:37:01.040] There are things that they must do and things that they normally do and we will ask about
[01:37:01.040 --> 01:37:03.300] those things.
[01:37:03.300 --> 01:37:10.420] And depending on how you answer, the system will produce motions, pleadings, criminal
[01:37:10.420 --> 01:37:12.460] complaints.
[01:37:12.460 --> 01:37:18.020] If they call the bailiff over and he gets ugly, a t-close complaint against him, all
[01:37:18.020 --> 01:37:25.660] the documents that are indicated so that the individual doesn't have to know all of the
[01:37:25.660 --> 01:37:31.500] underlying law, they just need to be able to tell the machine what happened and the
[01:37:31.500 --> 01:37:35.260] machine will just follow the codes.
[01:37:35.260 --> 01:37:41.180] We just set this up to walk down the codes and what the code indicates, it sends out
[01:37:41.180 --> 01:37:44.620] and all you have to do is sign and send.
[01:37:44.620 --> 01:37:51.780] Then after the first hearing where you're hearing where you agreed to appear, after
[01:37:51.780 --> 01:37:55.980] that hearing, then you'll be sent a notice to appear by the court.
[01:37:55.980 --> 01:38:02.220] But the notice won't tell you why you're being ordered to appear.
[01:38:02.220 --> 01:38:08.300] And when you go down there, what the hearing is going to be is a hearing to meet with the
[01:38:08.300 --> 01:38:10.580] prosecutor.
[01:38:10.580 --> 01:38:18.340] Now if anybody here has ever been in a civil suit, you never get a subpoena that orders
[01:38:18.340 --> 01:38:21.340] you to meet with opposing counsel.
[01:38:21.340 --> 01:38:26.780] If opposing counsel wants to meet with you, he's got to call you or call you secretary,
[01:38:26.780 --> 01:38:31.740] make an appointment and make an appointment at a time that's convenient to you.
[01:38:31.740 --> 01:38:37.500] But in adjudicating the traffic cases, that's not very efficient.
[01:38:37.500 --> 01:38:53.580] You see, according to the Office of Court Management, I keep losing what it's called,
[01:38:53.580 --> 01:38:59.060] they say that 73% of all of the tickets are just paid.
[01:38:59.060 --> 01:39:01.420] People just write a check and send it in.
[01:39:01.420 --> 01:39:05.500] If you write a check and send it in, you don't have to appear.
[01:39:05.500 --> 01:39:15.500] And there are 27% left that come in, plead not guilty.
[01:39:15.500 --> 01:39:21.500] Now those 27% are then called to this preliminary hearing.
[01:39:21.500 --> 01:39:27.900] 6% don't take a deal at the preliminary hearing.
[01:39:27.900 --> 01:39:37.420] So right after that first actual hearing, they've gotten rid of 94% of all the cases.
[01:39:37.420 --> 01:39:39.780] All of them guilty.
[01:39:39.780 --> 01:39:40.780] Everybody pleads guilty.
[01:39:40.780 --> 01:39:44.260] No look contender is guilty.
[01:39:44.260 --> 01:39:49.100] The way they do it is the prosecutor is set up to twist your arm, make all these kind
[01:39:49.100 --> 01:39:53.060] of threats he makes to get you to take these deal.
[01:39:53.060 --> 01:39:57.340] Well, here's the problem with that.
[01:39:57.340 --> 01:40:06.340] Under 28.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, 28.01 lists all of those things a judge can
[01:40:06.340 --> 01:40:10.240] order a defendant to court for.
[01:40:10.240 --> 01:40:12.460] First item is an arraignment.
[01:40:12.460 --> 01:40:20.300] There are 10 more items and all of those go to motions or pleadings before the court.
[01:40:20.300 --> 01:40:27.180] So they either have to call you in for a motions hearing or for the trial on the merits.
[01:40:27.180 --> 01:40:30.420] And that's included in that list.
[01:40:30.420 --> 01:40:32.620] That's it.
[01:40:32.620 --> 01:40:34.740] Except arraignment.
[01:40:34.740 --> 01:40:39.980] Problem with arraignment, 26.01 goes to arraignment.
[01:40:39.980 --> 01:40:47.380] It says, an arraignment may be had in the matter of a felony or a misdemeanor punishable
[01:40:47.380 --> 01:40:48.380] by imprisonment.
[01:40:48.380 --> 01:40:58.140] So you got to ask yourself, very first statute concerning arraignments and the legislature
[01:40:58.140 --> 01:41:04.820] saw fit to specifically exclude Class C misdemeanors.
[01:41:04.820 --> 01:41:12.780] Now when you read that code, it's one little sentence it is very hard to misinterpret
[01:41:12.780 --> 01:41:18.800] in the matter of a felony or misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment.
[01:41:18.800 --> 01:41:24.700] So in a Class C misdemeanor, they can't have an arraignment hearing, period.
[01:41:24.700 --> 01:41:30.780] So the only thing the judge can order you to court for is a motions hearing or trial
[01:41:30.780 --> 01:41:32.300] on the merits.
[01:41:32.300 --> 01:41:36.700] So they order you to court and that's why they don't tell you why.
[01:41:36.700 --> 01:41:41.020] Because there's nothing they can put on there that legal, so they just leave it blank.
[01:41:41.020 --> 01:41:43.540] So you come to court, you don't know why you come into court.
[01:41:43.540 --> 01:41:45.540] Well, here's why you come into court.
[01:41:45.540 --> 01:41:50.900] You're gonna come to court, you're gonna be ushered into the prosecutor's office.
[01:41:50.900 --> 01:41:59.580] And so that the prosecutor can put the pressure on you and force you to take a deal.
[01:41:59.580 --> 01:42:02.220] They're pretty good at it, they do it all the time.
[01:42:02.220 --> 01:42:08.300] So they know how to hit people's weak spots and coerce them into doing what they want.
[01:42:08.300 --> 01:42:14.060] They get to 21% of the ones that show up.
[01:42:14.060 --> 01:42:18.420] We wanna fix that, here's what we do.
[01:42:18.420 --> 01:42:24.060] We call that simulating the legal process on a part of the judge, which Scott alluded
[01:42:24.060 --> 01:42:26.440] to earlier.
[01:42:26.440 --> 01:42:33.100] The judge simulated a legal process, a meeting with a prosecuting attorney is not a legal
[01:42:33.100 --> 01:42:35.560] process.
[01:42:35.560 --> 01:42:39.020] It's a meeting between counsels.
[01:42:39.020 --> 01:42:46.180] And for the judge to use the power of the court to order you to come to this hearing,
[01:42:46.180 --> 01:42:52.340] it simulates emotions hearing, that's the only thing that can be, but then they don't
[01:42:52.340 --> 01:42:54.660] hold one.
[01:42:54.660 --> 01:42:58.060] So what's wrong with that picture?
[01:42:58.060 --> 01:43:08.860] Legal oppression, simulating a legal process, I wanna go to 3606, there's a bunch of them
[01:43:08.860 --> 01:43:10.540] you could go to.
[01:43:10.540 --> 01:43:16.820] But simulating a legal process is the best state jail felony.
[01:43:16.820 --> 01:43:24.380] And when you go down there, you need to get a copy of the appearance docket.
[01:43:24.380 --> 01:43:30.180] And when you file this criminal complaint against the judge, you file one for every
[01:43:30.180 --> 01:43:34.140] name that's on the appearance docket.
[01:43:34.140 --> 01:43:40.380] When I went to Southlake, I filed 58 against this prosecutor.
[01:43:40.380 --> 01:43:46.900] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of the Radio, I called in number at 512-646-1984.
[01:43:46.900 --> 01:43:51.140] Dean, I see you there, I'll pick you up on the other side.
[01:43:51.140 --> 01:44:00.700] We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.700 --> 01:44:02.900] Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:44:02.900 --> 01:44:08.260] It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it
[01:44:08.260 --> 01:44:09.260] needs.
[01:44:09.260 --> 01:44:12.980] Did you know the US government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:44:12.980 --> 01:44:17.540] and classified it as a schedule one drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.540 --> 01:44:21.780] People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know
[01:44:21.780 --> 01:44:22.780] what hemp is.
[01:44:22.780 --> 01:44:27.180] So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.180 --> 01:44:30.100] They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.100 --> 01:44:34.860] HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand
[01:44:34.860 --> 01:44:39.220] that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.220 --> 01:44:45.460] Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory,
[01:44:45.460 --> 01:44:48.260] non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.260 --> 01:44:56.660] Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you
[01:44:56.660 --> 01:45:01.700] only at hempusa.org.
[01:45:01.700 --> 01:45:04.900] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.900 --> 01:45:11.620] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[01:45:11.620 --> 01:45:15.540] that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.540 --> 01:45:19.380] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.380 --> 01:45:23.660] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.660 --> 01:45:28.500] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.500 --> 01:45:35.060] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:35.060 --> 01:45:39.940] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:39.940 --> 01:45:44.100] principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.100 --> 01:45:50.340] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:50.340 --> 01:45:52.900] pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.900 --> 01:46:21.460] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EASY.
[01:46:22.900 --> 01:46:36.460] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to Dean
[01:46:36.460 --> 01:46:37.460] in Texas.
[01:46:37.460 --> 01:46:38.460] Hello, Dean.
[01:46:38.460 --> 01:46:40.500] What do you have for us today?
[01:46:40.500 --> 01:46:43.580] Well, it's a crazy question.
[01:46:43.580 --> 01:46:46.740] This is my first time listening to you.
[01:46:46.740 --> 01:46:55.860] So everybody keeps saying you don't base your trial on merit.
[01:46:55.860 --> 01:46:57.060] What is merit?
[01:46:57.060 --> 01:47:00.220] What do you refer to as merit?
[01:47:00.220 --> 01:47:05.540] You never get to the facts of what happened.
[01:47:05.540 --> 01:47:13.800] You don't get to the facts of what happened until the jurisdiction of both parties has
[01:47:13.800 --> 01:47:19.140] been proven up.
[01:47:19.140 --> 01:47:26.940] If it's traffic, I wanna say, okay, Mr. Police Officer, who the heck are you?
[01:47:26.940 --> 01:47:31.700] What authority do you have to even talk to me?
[01:47:31.700 --> 01:47:35.120] Jurisdiction is presumed unless it's challenged.
[01:47:35.120 --> 01:47:39.180] Once it's challenged, it must be proven.
[01:47:39.180 --> 01:47:45.320] So the first thing we wanna do is go to the first thing the court has to show.
[01:47:45.320 --> 01:47:51.740] The court has to show that it has authority to talk to me in the first instance.
[01:47:51.740 --> 01:48:01.700] And when I file a challenge, the subject matter jurisdiction is lost, is how it works.
[01:48:01.700 --> 01:48:08.940] The courts presume jurisdiction is nice and efficient, makes everything move along easy.
[01:48:08.940 --> 01:48:14.680] And so long as nobody questions it, the court can act like it has jurisdiction, whether
[01:48:14.680 --> 01:48:17.340] it actually does or not.
[01:48:17.340 --> 01:48:23.940] But once jurisdiction is challenged, the presumption of jurisdiction is lost.
[01:48:23.940 --> 01:48:30.820] Now it is the duty of the court, not the opposing counsel, but the court to prove that it has
[01:48:30.820 --> 01:48:33.580] subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:48:33.580 --> 01:48:40.140] Your judge sends you a subpoena ordering you to come to court.
[01:48:40.140 --> 01:48:45.420] He has to be able to show that he had authority to do that.
[01:48:45.420 --> 01:48:53.820] We had a case in Austin, guy was sued over a credit card issue.
[01:48:53.820 --> 01:49:00.940] And the lawyers who filed the case filed the suit, but they didn't file an affidavit that
[01:49:00.940 --> 01:49:05.700] was required by statute to be filed along with the suit.
[01:49:05.700 --> 01:49:11.700] That means they failed to meet the statutory filing requirements and were therefore unable
[01:49:11.700 --> 01:49:16.080] to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[01:49:16.080 --> 01:49:18.620] So we sued the judge.
[01:49:18.620 --> 01:49:22.260] Oh, that was great fun.
[01:49:22.260 --> 01:49:27.180] The judge came into court and the client said, well, your honor, what are you doing here?
[01:49:27.180 --> 01:49:31.860] It was Judge Evans, the JP there in the old courthouse.
[01:49:31.860 --> 01:49:32.860] He said, well, I'm the judge.
[01:49:32.860 --> 01:49:36.300] He said, but you can't be here, I sued you.
[01:49:36.300 --> 01:49:37.300] What, what?
[01:49:37.300 --> 01:49:40.140] He went and got the suit.
[01:49:40.140 --> 01:49:41.140] He's reading it.
[01:49:41.140 --> 01:49:43.100] Oh my, oh my.
[01:49:43.100 --> 01:49:46.860] We challenged subject matter jurisdiction and they didn't answer it.
[01:49:46.860 --> 01:49:51.020] So we're saying he was impersonating a judge.
[01:49:51.020 --> 01:49:55.340] He may have been a judge in some context, but not here.
[01:49:55.340 --> 01:49:58.260] He hasn't proved it up in this case.
[01:49:58.260 --> 01:50:05.180] Once they get all that proved up, now we can go to the merits, but not until they do.
[01:50:05.180 --> 01:50:12.020] So that's when we say, especially in traffic, try never to get to the merits.
[01:50:12.020 --> 01:50:20.780] Reason being, when you get to the merits, then it's up to the discretion of the judge
[01:50:20.780 --> 01:50:27.940] or the jury to believe what they decide to believe, to apply the facts and the law the
[01:50:27.940 --> 01:50:35.300] way they personally believe they should be applied, and that is always a crapshoot.
[01:50:35.300 --> 01:50:43.780] Now, if you're the petitioner, you want to get to the merits right away, but if you're
[01:50:43.780 --> 01:50:46.180] the defendant, you don't ever want to get to the merits.
[01:50:46.180 --> 01:50:48.180] Does that make sense, Dean?
[01:50:48.180 --> 01:50:49.180] Okay.
[01:50:49.180 --> 01:50:50.180] Yeah.
[01:50:50.180 --> 01:50:51.180] Yeah.
[01:50:51.180 --> 01:50:52.180] Right.
[01:50:52.180 --> 01:51:00.740] I had a jury trial in a municipal court, not a record of court.
[01:51:00.740 --> 01:51:07.660] I applied for an appeal and I'm waiting for that.
[01:51:07.660 --> 01:51:09.100] Can I start all over?
[01:51:09.100 --> 01:51:10.100] Absolutely.
[01:51:10.100 --> 01:51:11.100] Okay.
[01:51:11.100 --> 01:51:15.700] Let me explain trial de novo.
[01:51:15.700 --> 01:51:27.660] Trial de novo means that for the purpose of perfecting your appeal, it is as if the original
[01:51:27.660 --> 01:51:30.580] trial didn't happen.
[01:51:30.580 --> 01:51:39.620] And being pedantic here, there's a reason, it is trial de novo only for the purpose of
[01:51:39.620 --> 01:51:42.540] perfecting your appeal.
[01:51:42.540 --> 01:51:47.660] That means you don't have to appeal based on writ of error.
[01:51:47.660 --> 01:51:53.340] Whereas in a court of record, you have to show that the court errored in some way.
[01:51:53.340 --> 01:51:59.780] And what the courts will do is they will use that as an excuse to pull any kind of shenanigans
[01:51:59.780 --> 01:52:05.620] in the original court they want to, because if you appeal, it's a do-over.
[01:52:05.620 --> 01:52:09.540] Well, no, it's not.
[01:52:09.540 --> 01:52:13.260] This is not a court de novo.
[01:52:13.260 --> 01:52:17.340] It'll be a notice of appeal.
[01:52:17.340 --> 01:52:20.780] It'll be to what, a district, a court higher up.
[01:52:20.780 --> 01:52:22.260] Yeah, higher court.
[01:52:22.260 --> 01:52:24.100] Go to a county court.
[01:52:24.100 --> 01:52:25.100] Right.
[01:52:25.100 --> 01:52:26.100] Yes.
[01:52:26.100 --> 01:52:29.300] Is this a traffic issue?
[01:52:29.300 --> 01:52:31.300] Same thing.
[01:52:31.300 --> 01:52:32.760] Yes.
[01:52:32.760 --> 01:52:38.200] You want to go to trafficticket.website and get these documents.
[01:52:38.200 --> 01:52:41.980] This will give them apoplexy.
[01:52:41.980 --> 01:52:47.780] Is it a municipal court or a JP?
[01:52:47.780 --> 01:52:49.780] Municipal.
[01:52:49.780 --> 01:53:01.820] Oh, if you read the Texas Administrative Code and Texas Transportation Code, there is nothing
[01:53:01.820 --> 01:53:09.700] in the code that grants a municipality the authority to enforce the transportation code.
[01:53:09.700 --> 01:53:11.260] Nothing.
[01:53:11.260 --> 01:53:17.540] Now, does that sound insane?
[01:53:17.540 --> 01:53:21.740] They're writing 6 million tickets a year, 6.6 million.
[01:53:21.740 --> 01:53:27.940] They don't have any authority to write it at all.
[01:53:27.940 --> 01:53:33.900] I'd look at this and say, this is insane.
[01:53:33.900 --> 01:53:37.420] But I'm looking at exactly what the code says.
[01:53:37.420 --> 01:53:47.220] The code says that the Department of Public Safety was created for the purpose of enforcing
[01:53:47.220 --> 01:53:53.120] this commercial process.
[01:53:53.120 --> 01:54:02.460] It's an enforcement of a professional, I had the right words earlier, lost the right words.
[01:54:02.460 --> 01:54:11.060] It's like you have the American Medical Association that enforces the medical profession, the
[01:54:11.060 --> 01:54:13.060] Bar Association for lawyers.
[01:54:13.060 --> 01:54:18.960] You've got the Texas Department of Transportation for commercial drivers, and they enforce the
[01:54:18.960 --> 01:54:29.100] commercial activity of operating a motor-drawn conveyance for hire.
[01:54:29.100 --> 01:54:32.540] The Department of Public Safety, that's all they're supposed to do.
[01:54:32.540 --> 01:54:39.620] The Administrative Code says the Department of Public Safety shall not enforce the criminal
[01:54:39.620 --> 01:54:46.300] laws except at the request of and under the direction of local law enforcement.
[01:54:46.300 --> 01:54:55.700] They were just created to enforce the professional commercial transportation code.
[01:54:55.700 --> 01:55:06.740] And the legislature authorized the county commissioners to hire five sheriff's deputies.
[01:55:06.740 --> 01:55:11.860] They had to be qualified sheriff's deputies for the purpose of enforcing the transportation
[01:55:11.860 --> 01:55:14.180] code.
[01:55:14.180 --> 01:55:20.420] One of which could be a municipal officer.
[01:55:20.420 --> 01:55:27.340] But all that municipal officer could do is DLT inspections.
[01:55:27.340 --> 01:55:34.020] And all of the sheriff's deputies that enforce the transportation code have to be on motorcycles,
[01:55:34.020 --> 01:55:35.020] 701.103.
[01:55:35.020 --> 01:55:39.220] This sounds insane.
[01:55:39.220 --> 01:55:40.900] I didn't write it.
[01:55:40.900 --> 01:55:44.640] I just read it, and that's what it says.
[01:55:44.640 --> 01:55:53.660] So when the officer turned his lights on you, and you pulled over, and the officer didn't
[01:55:53.660 --> 01:56:00.780] pull around you, then he was making a stop under the authority of the Texas Transportation
[01:56:00.780 --> 01:56:04.820] Code 545.421.
[01:56:04.820 --> 01:56:09.560] But he did not have authority to make that stop.
[01:56:09.560 --> 01:56:15.460] That means he exerted or purported to exert an authority he did not expressly have and
[01:56:15.460 --> 01:56:23.060] in the process arrested you in your freedom of movement and seized you for purposes of
[01:56:23.060 --> 01:56:24.820] Fourth Amendment.
[01:56:24.820 --> 01:56:31.140] And he did so while acting under the color or pretense of an official capacity.
[01:56:31.140 --> 01:56:35.780] That's a Class A misdemeanor in the state of Texas 3903 Penal Code.
[01:56:35.780 --> 01:56:42.020] At the time, he was not actually a public servant.
[01:56:42.020 --> 01:56:48.700] He was exercising a activity that was not within the scope of his authority.
[01:56:48.700 --> 01:56:51.660] So he was impersonating a public official.
[01:56:51.660 --> 01:56:56.420] That's a state jail felony in the state of Texas.
[01:56:56.420 --> 01:57:02.920] However, he was also prominently displaying a deadly weapon.
[01:57:02.920 --> 01:57:09.220] If you commit simple assault and you are prominently displaying a deadly weapon, that's a felony
[01:57:09.220 --> 01:57:19.100] to second degree unless you are a public official acting under the color or pretense of an official
[01:57:19.100 --> 01:57:25.060] capacity, in which case it is a felony of the first degree.
[01:57:25.060 --> 01:57:32.700] Our legislature intended that when that policeman stop you and he's wearing that pistol, that
[01:57:32.700 --> 01:57:38.380] is a really serious business and he better be very careful.
[01:57:38.380 --> 01:57:42.660] Well, they forgot about that.
[01:57:42.660 --> 01:57:45.420] But I did need to complain.
[01:57:45.420 --> 01:57:54.740] I haven't filed it yet, but for that purpose, a deadly weapon because I've listened to Eddie
[01:57:54.740 --> 01:58:05.460] Craig and I'm getting ready to also file a complaint for impersonating an officer, traffic
[01:58:05.460 --> 01:58:06.460] officer.
[01:58:06.460 --> 01:58:08.780] Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:58:08.780 --> 01:58:14.220] There's something much more powerful than the complaint and we only got 40 seconds.
[01:58:14.220 --> 01:58:16.700] Look up Texas Commission on Law Enforcement.
[01:58:16.700 --> 01:58:20.660] That's a professional agency that regulates police officers.
[01:58:20.660 --> 01:58:24.280] File a TCLOS complaint against the officer.
[01:58:24.280 --> 01:58:27.260] He will go ballistic.
[01:58:27.260 --> 01:58:31.260] Six of those and nobody will hire him.
[01:58:31.260 --> 01:58:35.900] So it really damages his career and that's more powerful than the criminal complaint.
[01:58:35.900 --> 01:58:37.920] Okay, I am sorry.
[01:58:37.920 --> 01:58:39.020] We are out of time.
[01:58:39.020 --> 01:58:42.420] If you will call back tomorrow, Dean, we will talk about this some more.
[01:58:42.420 --> 01:58:43.860] We've got four hours tomorrow.
[01:58:43.860 --> 01:58:50.340] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Wheel of Law Radio, thank you and good night.
[01:58:50.340 --> 01:58:55.660] I'm Randy Kelton, good night by the way.
[01:58:55.660 --> 01:58:57.120] God bless you.
[01:58:57.120 --> 01:58:59.160] I appreciate it.
[01:58:59.160 --> 01:59:00.720] Have a Carl rates for life.
[01:59:00.720 --> 01:59:01.720] See you tomorrow.
[01:59:01.720 --> 01:59:07.600] Explain what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning
[01:59:07.600 --> 01:59:08.600] of life.
[01:59:08.600 --> 01:59:11.840] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.840 --> 01:59:20.820] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.820 --> 01:59:26.360] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.360 --> 01:59:30.360] charts and maps, and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.360 --> 01:59:32.920] This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.920 --> 01:59:41.240] To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.240 --> 01:59:59.600] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.