ROL_2017-03-31_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:27.120]  Today in history, the year 1882, the night of Columbus, the world's largest Catholic
[00:27.120 --> 00:32.160]  fraternal service organization are established, originally serving as a mutual benefit society
[00:32.160 --> 00:35.280]  to work in class in immigrant Catholics in the United States.
[00:35.280 --> 00:39.360]  It developed into a fraternal benefit society dedicated to providing charitable services,
[00:39.360 --> 00:44.520]  providing Catholic education and Catholic public policy, and actively defending Catholicism
[00:44.520 --> 00:46.000]  in various nations.
[00:46.000 --> 00:50.640]  With roughly two million members consisting of Catholic men age 18 and older and nearly
[00:50.640 --> 00:55.400]  15,000 councils, the night of Columbus consists of four different degrees, and the Order is
[00:55.400 --> 00:58.520]  a member of the International Alliance of Catholic Knights.
[00:58.520 --> 01:03.560]  The KFC founded today in history.
[01:03.560 --> 01:07.800]  In recent years, David Robert Daly-Eiden and Sandra Merritt were charged Tuesday yesterday
[01:07.800 --> 01:12.320]  by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra with 15 felony counts of violating the privacy
[01:12.320 --> 01:13.320]  of healthcare providers.
[01:13.320 --> 01:17.520]  If you recall, they are the two anti-abortion activists who pose as alternative identities
[01:17.520 --> 01:21.960]  in a fictitious bioresearch company to meet Planned Parenthood officials secretly recording
[01:21.960 --> 01:26.560]  their conversations, leading to the selling of fetal tissue in organs for profit scandal.
[01:26.560 --> 01:32.800]  The charge consists of 14 instances between October 2013 and July of 2015, where Daly-Eiden
[01:32.800 --> 01:36.360]  and Merritt filmed Planned Parenthood personnel without permission.
[01:36.360 --> 01:40.720]  They are facing a felony count for each person they discreetly recorded, along with an additional
[01:40.720 --> 01:44.120]  felony charge for criminal conspiracy to invade privacy.
[01:44.120 --> 01:47.760]  Mary Alice Carter, Interim Vice President of Communications for Planned Parenthood,
[01:47.760 --> 01:52.000]  Federation of America, said in a statement Tuesday that the nationwide investigation
[01:52.000 --> 01:55.760]  have made it clear that Planned Parenthood has done nothing wrong and that only people
[01:55.760 --> 02:01.080]  who broke the law are those behind the fraudulent tapes.
[02:01.080 --> 02:06.040]  Abidemi Ajiboye, Assistant Professor at Case Western Reserve University, lead author of
[02:06.040 --> 02:10.640]  a research paper published yesterday Tuesday in the Lancet, stated that we have been able
[02:10.640 --> 02:15.600]  to make the electrical signals which represent thoughts and use that to control simulations
[02:15.600 --> 02:17.120]  of the arm and hand.
[02:17.120 --> 02:21.440]  Its experimental new technology is being called neuroprostetics, expected to be available
[02:21.440 --> 02:23.760]  to the general public in five to ten years.
[02:23.760 --> 02:28.000]  The tech relies on creating an entirely new neurological central nervous connection between
[02:28.000 --> 02:32.520]  the brain and a paralyzed limb by implanting an electrode array which is used to detect
[02:32.520 --> 02:37.080]  and record and braid signals from the motor cortex of the brain and then uses those signals
[02:37.080 --> 02:39.360]  to actuate movements from mechanical limbs.
[02:39.360 --> 02:44.520]  Robert Kirsch, a professor of biomedical engineering at Case Western, told NPR essentially
[02:44.520 --> 02:49.400]  that we have an algorithm that sort of transforms neural signals into movement and that the
[02:49.400 --> 02:50.400]  code is in our brain.
[02:50.400 --> 03:09.400]  This was Rick Brody with your lowdown for March 29, 2017.
[03:09.400 --> 03:20.600]  One of the main
[03:20.600 --> 03:27.160]  What You Gonna Do, What You Gonna Do?
[03:27.160 --> 03:28.920]  Bad boys, bad boys
[03:28.920 --> 03:32.600]  What You gonna do, What You gonna do when they come for you?
[03:32.600 --> 03:34.400]  Bad boys, bad boys
[03:34.400 --> 03:39.920]  What You gonna do, What You gonna do when they come for you?
[03:39.920 --> 03:44.320]  Okay, howdy howdy. This is Randy Kelton, Roodle Law Radio,
[03:44.320 --> 03:49.320]  On this Friday, the 31st day of March, 2017,
[03:51.060 --> 03:55.320]  we are a quarter of the way through another year already.
[03:56.160 --> 03:59.840]  My house time flies when you are having fun.
[04:00.760 --> 04:03.720]  And we are having fun, at least I'm having fun.
[04:03.720 --> 04:07.760]  I have a programmer who's actually getting me some work done.
[04:07.760 --> 04:17.760]  We will have a tool online soon, almost certainly by the end of the week,
[04:19.040 --> 04:24.720]  where you can go on, fill out some information, ask a questionnaire on a ticket.
[04:26.560 --> 04:35.640]  And I have the subject matter jurisdiction section questionnaire almost complete.
[04:35.640 --> 04:42.920]  So we will, we have the section where we collect basic information for the ticket.
[04:44.560 --> 04:49.880]  Then we'll, next thing we'll post up is the questionnaire.
[04:51.360 --> 04:56.320]  And the system will, as you go through the questionnaire,
[04:57.240 --> 05:00.680]  it'll make documents available, you can just click and download.
[05:00.680 --> 05:07.760]  We're going to make, as an alpha, we're going to make this available to our purchasers
[05:07.760 --> 05:16.560]  of the legal 101, the ebook, so that we can run an alpha version and get people to use it
[05:16.560 --> 05:22.120]  and get us feedback, because we're certainly to have a good number of errors.
[05:22.120 --> 05:30.720]  And this will provide the basic foundation for the entire electronic lawyer.
[05:32.560 --> 05:39.360]  It's a very focused issue, and it allows us to develop some of the underlying tools.
[05:41.360 --> 05:48.280]  When you sit back and look at the legal issue, like, like tickets,
[05:48.280 --> 05:57.560]  and you're not legal professionals, you get a ticket, you have no idea how to fight this ticket,
[05:57.560 --> 06:02.640]  because there are so many possibilities out there in law.
[06:04.480 --> 06:11.000]  And you can go down the law library and you step in the door and you look
[06:11.000 --> 06:14.400]  down these long aisles of very large books.
[06:14.400 --> 06:21.000]  Now, you pretty well know that the vast majority
[06:21.000 --> 06:24.560]  of all that literature in there doesn't apply to you.
[06:26.880 --> 06:35.280]  Problem is, is you don't know how to get to those half a dozen pages or so
[06:35.280 --> 06:41.680]  in this huge library that actually relate to you or your issue.
[06:41.680 --> 06:45.920]  That has always been the problem with law.
[06:47.360 --> 06:52.040]  Lawyers spend lifetimes figuring out how to sort these things out.
[06:53.120 --> 06:59.720]  And in somewhat recent times, we stopped having lawyers
[06:59.720 --> 07:01.960]  who do general practice for the most part,
[07:03.600 --> 07:05.960]  because general practice is too complex for a lawyer.
[07:05.960 --> 07:15.680]  Too many issues, too many details, and more so than a pro-sale litigant.
[07:16.920 --> 07:20.440]  Lawyers are terrified of all this law.
[07:22.320 --> 07:32.160]  Okay, they get pretty good at certain parts of it, but every time a lawyer produces a document
[07:32.160 --> 07:37.720]  on an issue he hasn't done a hundred times, he's terrified.
[07:39.240 --> 07:44.520]  I think he's most terrified of is missing something.
[07:46.360 --> 07:53.720]  Now, if you are going and we're pro-sale or pro-pr, all those pro-po words,
[07:55.520 --> 08:00.120]  you can miss something and a judge will rule against you for it.
[08:00.120 --> 08:03.240]  But big deal, it's going to rule against you anyway.
[08:04.480 --> 08:09.880]  Or he will wag his finger at you and say, naughty pro-sale, naughty pro-sale.
[08:11.320 --> 08:13.080]  Big deal, you're not learned in counsel.
[08:13.080 --> 08:20.200]  They don't expect you to know all this stuff, and you don't have any specific responsibility
[08:20.200 --> 08:26.560]  for knowing all this stuff other than you have a responsibility to find the right stuff
[08:26.560 --> 08:30.000]  so that you can adjudicate your rights.
[08:31.000 --> 08:35.240]  But the only thing that will happen is they will against you.
[08:37.080 --> 08:38.760]  Big deal, they're going to do that anyway.
[08:39.920 --> 08:44.000]  But the lawyer, why, he's learned at counsel.
[08:45.000 --> 08:49.800]  He doesn't get to come before the court and say, oops, I missed something.
[08:51.040 --> 08:54.360]  Judges will land on him like a ton of bricks.
[08:54.360 --> 09:06.760]  Well, maybe they won't, but they can, and depending on how the judge happens to feel today,
[09:07.760 --> 09:13.160]  will determine whether they will or not or whether the judge happens to be annoyed
[09:13.160 --> 09:14.680]  at this lawyer for some reason.
[09:14.680 --> 09:27.400]  The point is they can sanction lawyers any time they want to, and they do sanction lawyers on occasion.
[09:28.920 --> 09:35.000]  A combination of these two creates a situation to where the lawyer has to consider the possibility
[09:35.560 --> 09:39.560]  that if I screw something up, this judge is going to land on me like a ton of bricks.
[09:39.560 --> 09:47.800]  He probably won't, but he can, and if he does, to just do anything he wants to that lawyer,
[09:47.800 --> 09:49.400]  he'll pretty well put him out of business.
[09:51.320 --> 09:59.560]  Most people who deal with lawyers, they don't realize that as boisterous and commanding
[09:59.560 --> 10:03.400]  as lawyers can be, they are terrified.
[10:04.480 --> 10:05.640]  They're afraid of everybody.
[10:05.640 --> 10:06.640]  They're afraid of everything.
[10:06.640 --> 10:12.320]  Everywhere they go in the legal system, they go there dangling by their bar cards.
[10:15.840 --> 10:21.120]  Everything they do can affect their bar card, and we talk about that on the air.
[10:22.400 --> 10:23.840]  We understand that.
[10:23.840 --> 10:32.640]  That's why bar grievances are so powerful, because the bar grievance affects the bar card
[10:32.640 --> 10:40.240]  carriers, errors, and emissions policy cost, and a policy that starts around 25 grand.
[10:41.680 --> 10:50.480]  So it's pretty big deals, a lot of money, one grievance, one mistake, one actual mistake,
[10:51.360 --> 10:56.560]  or one failure to keep your client happy can get you a bar grievance.
[10:56.560 --> 11:00.320]  You get a bar grievance again, and this first year of practice they'll cancel immediately.
[11:00.320 --> 11:03.200]  So lawyers are terrified of that.
[11:04.880 --> 11:06.960]  One mistake, the judge can sanction you.
[11:09.440 --> 11:18.160]  It's hard from the outside to appreciate how much time lawyers spend shaking in their boots,
[11:19.280 --> 11:26.640]  because they certainly do that, and these tools we use will help take advantage of that,
[11:26.640 --> 11:35.200]  but even a lawyer could use these tools, because we start out asking a set of questions,
[11:35.200 --> 11:38.800]  for instance in the subject matter jurisdiction issue.
[11:39.600 --> 11:48.480]  We start out asking questions that go to whether or not you are in commerce.
[11:48.480 --> 11:57.760]  First question, at the time you were stopped by the officer, were you actually operating
[11:58.560 --> 12:01.040]  a conveyance slash vehicle?
[12:01.040 --> 12:09.600]  And I used that terminology carefully, conveyance slash vehicle, to demonstrate that
[12:12.000 --> 12:16.880]  you use the term conveyance or vehicle depending on whether or not you're in
[12:16.880 --> 12:18.960]  commerce or out of commerce.
[12:20.240 --> 12:30.240]  So were you actually operating that conveyance slash vehicle on a public thoroughfare?
[12:30.240 --> 12:34.560]  And I have a little box that explains about public thoroughfare.
[12:35.200 --> 12:41.600]  I actually start with asking where you're driving or operating that vehicle in a parking lot
[12:41.600 --> 12:47.600]  or other area that is not a public thoroughfare.
[12:47.600 --> 12:52.720]  Then I have a box pop up that says what is a public thoroughfare, what is not a public thoroughfare.
[12:54.400 --> 12:58.240]  And then I ask if you were actually in the vehicle when you were stopped,
[13:00.160 --> 13:05.440]  were you, if you were in the vehicle, were the keys in ignition?
[13:05.440 --> 13:13.120]  All of these questions go to very specific legal issues.
[13:14.480 --> 13:19.200]  So they've got all the issues that I'm aware of for a ticket.
[13:20.240 --> 13:22.320]  And I put in a question for each one of them.
[13:24.320 --> 13:28.560]  And depending on how you answer the question, you'll determine what the next question is.
[13:28.560 --> 13:34.320]  I can have as many of these issues as I want to.
[13:35.520 --> 13:42.560]  I could put a list of a hundred possibilities and you look at it and you just select one of them.
[13:43.520 --> 13:48.960]  And when you select one of them, all of the rest of those possibilities are ignored.
[13:50.320 --> 13:54.480]  All the case law, all the statutory support that go to all of those issues,
[13:54.480 --> 13:56.320]  I don't have to pay attention to that stuff.
[13:56.320 --> 14:01.200]  I only have to pay attention to the issue that is before me.
[14:02.720 --> 14:09.200]  So this questionnaire will take the issue of subject matter jurisdiction of the court
[14:10.400 --> 14:19.040]  and walk through every permutation that I'm aware of, which certainly begs the question,
[14:19.040 --> 14:26.320]  what is it that Calton's not aware of? The answer to that one is really, really big.
[14:27.360 --> 14:31.200]  But it's not a problem because I have this error.
[14:32.800 --> 14:40.240]  And if I come across an issue, which I did on someone that Daniel was on last night as a
[14:41.360 --> 14:45.520]  co-host and he sent me to someone north of Houston,
[14:45.520 --> 14:54.640]  the first thing to come up with an issue I hadn't had, she got a ticket for a failure to
[14:54.640 --> 15:03.600]  register her vehicle. Problem. The expired plates on the vehicle were expired Virginia plates.
[15:05.040 --> 15:10.240]  Well, I didn't have that in my questionnaire. I said, oh, goody. So I go to my questionnaire
[15:10.240 --> 15:18.400]  and one of the first questions I asked, the officer pulls you over, did you have license
[15:18.400 --> 15:24.480]  plates on your vehicle? And they, yes, no. And depending on where they said yes or no,
[15:24.480 --> 15:31.920]  depending on where I went from there and anybody who has any familiarity with the law
[15:31.920 --> 15:36.640]  understands how different those two are. They go to whole different sections of law.
[15:36.640 --> 15:41.600]  So if you say yes, the next question I took, the system, next question was going to be,
[15:42.720 --> 15:53.520]  were the license plates that were displayed on the vehicle current? And instead of asking
[15:53.520 --> 15:58.720]  that question, I went in between and broke the questionnaire apart and dropped in,
[15:59.920 --> 16:05.920]  were the plates registered in the state in which you were stopped? So I just took that issue in
[16:05.920 --> 16:11.520]  there. I asked all the questions that go to that and then plugged the rest of the questions
[16:12.160 --> 16:17.360]  that I would be asking anyway on to the end of it. Once I have this put together,
[16:18.640 --> 16:27.120]  it becomes a reservoir of legal knowledge. Everyone who uses it, anytime they
[16:27.120 --> 16:36.080]  approach this and they have a legal issue that's not included in this questionnaire,
[16:36.080 --> 16:40.000]  we look at the questionnaire and we say, okay, we need to ask that question about this issue right
[16:40.000 --> 16:48.960]  here. We break it apart, we drop a set of questions in there. And then I'll be setting up a folder
[16:48.960 --> 16:54.960]  and a blog for each one of these issues. The folder is a place where you can take case law
[16:54.960 --> 17:03.600]  and treatise is another information concerning this saying cookie cookie me love cookies oh
[17:03.600 --> 17:10.400]  hi cookie munchers no these are yucky cookie cookie no no bad cookies you can't even eat
[17:10.400 --> 17:16.400]  these cookies these are cyber cookies okay no they are cyber cookies and they clog up your
[17:16.400 --> 17:25.360]  computer me have apple really oh that's an actual apple yummy apple i'm going to throw away these
[17:25.360 --> 17:32.240]  yucky cookies in the trash i click control shift the leaves and then scroll down to cookies and
[17:32.240 --> 17:39.120]  clear them bye bye yucky cookies now i go to logos radio network dot com and i click on the amazon
[17:39.120 --> 17:44.720]  box on the upper right hand side bookmarks the link and i can go to amazon through this link
[17:44.720 --> 17:51.280]  and order you some yummy new cookie cookies for me consider it an early christmas present and
[17:51.280 --> 17:56.400]  every time i order on amazon i go through this link and i give a little present to this radio
[17:56.400 --> 18:02.960]  network too these for cookie these are classified are you being harassed by debt collectors with
[18:02.960 --> 18:08.800]  phone calls letters or even lawsuits stop debt collectors now with the michael mirris proven
[18:08.800 --> 18:14.400]  method michael mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win
[18:14.400 --> 18:20.080]  two you'll get step by step instructions in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil
[18:20.080 --> 18:26.080]  right statutes what to do when contacted by phones mail or court summons how to answer letters and
[18:26.080 --> 18:30.560]  phone calls how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports how to turn the financial
[18:30.560 --> 18:37.040]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away the michael mirris proven method is the solution
[18:37.040 --> 18:42.480]  for how to stop debt collectors personal consultation is available as well for more information
[18:42.480 --> 18:48.080]  please visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the blue michael mirris banner or email michael
[18:48.080 --> 18:57.040]  mirris at yahoo dot com that's rule of law radio dot com or email m i c h a e l m i r r a s at yahoo
[18:57.040 --> 19:05.120]  dot com to learn how to stop debt collectors next you are listening to the logos radio network
[19:05.120 --> 19:16.560]  logo the logos radio network dot com
[19:16.560 --> 19:28.000]  um
[19:38.960 --> 19:45.360]  okay we are back randy kelton rule of law radio on this friday the 31st day of march
[19:45.360 --> 19:55.600]  2017 this may mark the day we start the demise of the legal profession and get the legal profession
[19:55.600 --> 20:06.160]  to pay us to do it because in using this tool if i've explained it right i'm hoping that you
[20:06.160 --> 20:18.320]  understand the ramifications i did seminars in australia once and i went down there and had 32
[20:18.320 --> 20:27.200]  of the premier prosa legal researchers in the country in sydney in a room and they were complaining
[20:28.080 --> 20:34.800]  that when they filed criminal appearance notices that's what a complaint is called in
[20:34.800 --> 20:44.240]  in australia criminal appearance notice it's literally a summons because in england and australia
[20:45.760 --> 20:54.400]  and other x colonies and current colonies they all use the english law that a citizen
[20:55.360 --> 21:03.280]  is considered a common law public official so they have standing to initiate a prosecution
[21:03.280 --> 21:10.480]  of a crime and they issue an appearance notice a criminal appearance notice but if you're not a
[21:10.480 --> 21:17.600]  lawyer the county registrar has to sign off on the criminal appearance notice to make sure it meets
[21:17.600 --> 21:23.440]  all the statutory legal requirements and they were complaining that the registrars were not
[21:23.440 --> 21:29.040]  signing off on their criminal appearance notices so i asked them you know i told them that you know
[21:29.040 --> 21:35.040]  i'm a bloody yank and i'm not going to pretend that i know more about australia law than you do
[21:35.040 --> 21:44.160]  so tell me under the 1996 new south wales crimes act what is a physical element of a crime
[21:45.600 --> 21:53.920]  now sit there just look at me i didn't make that up i pulled that out of their code very first
[21:53.920 --> 22:03.520]  section speaks to physical elements and in the second thing i said okay okay guys what is a
[22:03.520 --> 22:10.240]  fault element that renders a physical element criminal and he just sat there looking at me
[22:11.600 --> 22:17.360]  i said guys i need you all to line up along the wall so i can walk down the row and bitch
[22:17.360 --> 22:26.720]  slap every one of you and knock some sins into you read the code well i got out the new south
[22:26.720 --> 22:37.520]  wales act criminal section ours in texas is about the most complete body of law i've ever come across
[22:39.920 --> 22:46.000]  it's about uh maybe a hundred pages and most of it's white space because it's written in outline
[22:46.000 --> 22:58.880]  forms theirs was 500 pages our section on uh intoxication offenses were about three pages
[23:00.240 --> 23:08.160]  theirs was 32 pages so it's understandable the law is so huge how the heck are you supposed to
[23:08.160 --> 23:14.000]  go through all this you know they've had uh several hundred years more than we have
[23:14.000 --> 23:20.400]  of legislators getting into office and they're only purpose of legislators right new laws so
[23:20.400 --> 23:26.000]  they're coming up with all these new laws like a lot more than we do and much more difficult
[23:26.000 --> 23:32.720]  to struggle through it and that kind of was the carnal that got this started how do we take all
[23:32.720 --> 23:43.680]  of this massive body of law and mind down through it so that we only find that law that relates to
[23:43.680 --> 23:52.080]  you or your issue lawyers over time learn how to do this when they first get out of law school
[23:52.080 --> 23:58.720]  they don't really have a clue but over the years they begin to work out how to fit these pieces
[23:58.720 --> 24:05.760]  together and the law is so complex that lawyers tend to specialize in certain areas because they
[24:05.760 --> 24:15.280]  can't hold enough information to sort it all out well we're creating this electronic lawyer that
[24:15.280 --> 24:26.960]  there is no effective limit to how much this lawyer can remember so long as we have effective
[24:26.960 --> 24:40.480]  links i call it referential index we have an index of different contexts we ask a question and it
[24:40.480 --> 24:49.040]  implies a number of possible contexts then we select the one that fits and that one apply
[24:49.040 --> 24:56.720]  implies other contexts and we select the one that fits and this way we draw a line down through
[24:56.720 --> 25:09.680]  all of this massive accumulation of code and case law a focused bright line through the mass of
[25:09.680 --> 25:19.760]  legal knowledge and only address pull from the system what applies to us and but in the next
[25:19.760 --> 25:26.320]  week we hope to have this alpha version up for testing and everybody who's about the ebook can go
[25:26.320 --> 25:33.280]  on and fill in the the questionnaire for a current ticket pass ticket makes no difference
[25:34.800 --> 25:44.000]  and this thing will create all of the documents you need to represent all of the issues
[25:45.120 --> 25:49.200]  that are referenced in this collection now this collection is not going to be complete
[25:49.200 --> 25:56.560]  as a matter of fact we will never ever have a connect collection that is complete
[25:58.320 --> 26:08.960]  but it will constantly be growing and increasing and adding expertise until this questionnaire
[26:10.320 --> 26:17.200]  will have the expertise of every expert who uses it now it may not have everything
[26:17.200 --> 26:22.880]  but it's going to have a whole lot more than any one lawyer can hold in his head
[26:24.640 --> 26:33.920]  and when the individual can use this ask these very focused questions that go
[26:33.920 --> 26:40.240]  to very specific legal issues and any one person they're going to have their own issues
[26:41.200 --> 26:44.240]  but there's not going to be a massive number of issues that you have
[26:44.240 --> 26:49.440]  but there's going to be a very limited number of issues so it's not that great and it's not
[26:49.440 --> 26:56.720]  that complex the only complexity is figuring out from the plethora of possibilities which
[26:56.720 --> 27:03.840]  ones actually relate to you well we can sort that out relatively straightforward and then
[27:03.840 --> 27:16.080]  when we get to each issue we don't have to consider the entire case in total for a long
[27:16.080 --> 27:23.040]  time when I help people with cases I had this unstated presupposition that all of these issues
[27:23.040 --> 27:29.200]  all relate to each other so I have to isolate all the issues and then examine the law as it
[27:29.200 --> 27:39.520]  relates to all of these issues no I don't each issue is defined by code case law and
[27:40.960 --> 27:50.240]  other rule regulatory rules whatever it's each issue is specifically defined once I've isolated
[27:50.240 --> 28:00.400]  the legal issue now I can argue that issue in isolation separate from everything else so every
[28:00.400 --> 28:05.520]  time I come across information that goes to this issue I add it to this particular issue I can
[28:05.520 --> 28:09.920]  work out the issue work out all the documents related to the issue have them all sitting there
[28:09.920 --> 28:20.480]  and ready and no matter how the questioner the user manages to get to this issue once he steps on
[28:20.480 --> 28:26.800]  this issue the laws defining that issue are very specific I don't care how he got here it doesn't
[28:26.800 --> 28:33.120]  matter he got here I have the issue I have it all argued out I have all the relevant cases
[28:33.120 --> 28:40.960]  with in with all the references hyperlink so I have a complete document fully hyperlink format
[28:41.840 --> 28:48.080]  or I have a completed argument that I can drop into a document in fully hyperlink format
[28:51.440 --> 28:57.520]  what would happen if a pro se comes into court with this tool he walks in
[28:57.520 --> 29:05.200]  and unlike the lawyer who doesn't have it he doesn't have to worry about missing anything
[29:06.480 --> 29:14.080]  the system's got it all if he's missed something it's something so arcane that it's either nobody's
[29:14.080 --> 29:22.400]  ever thought of it or nobody has ever addressed it and if he misses something that's really arcane
[29:22.400 --> 29:31.200]  the courts are going to give him room to adjust that they're not going to hold that against him
[29:32.640 --> 29:36.480]  if opposing counsel comes in and he is not as thorough as the pro se
[29:37.520 --> 29:41.760]  the judge is likely to put a button off his shirt to quote Harman Taylor
[29:42.640 --> 29:49.520]  anyway that's basically the system we hope to have it up by next week and then we can start
[29:49.520 --> 29:53.280]  using it and test it out we're going to go to break soon but as soon as we come back we're
[29:53.280 --> 29:58.000]  going to go to our callers we have a number of callers on the board we'll be right back
[30:01.280 --> 30:08.080]  is it iphone or i-spy in germany one man had to file a lawsuit to learn how his cell phone
[30:08.080 --> 30:14.320]  carrier was tracking his every move 24-7 and dr kathryn albrecht and i'll have the creepy details
[30:14.320 --> 30:20.640]  in a moment privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back
[30:20.640 --> 30:26.880]  again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so protect
[30:26.880 --> 30:32.960]  your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth
[30:32.960 --> 30:38.320]  hanging on to this message is brought to you by start page dot com the private search engine
[30:38.320 --> 30:46.400]  alternative to google yahoo and bang start over with start page do you know how much data your
[30:46.400 --> 30:52.880]  cell phone company collects on you in germany green party politician malta spitz didn't so he asked
[30:52.880 --> 30:58.720]  when his carrier objected he sued tracking people's whereabouts is what phone companies do to
[30:58.720 --> 31:04.240]  route calls efficiently they ping customer cell phones every few seconds but when a court ordered
[31:04.240 --> 31:10.400]  dutch telecom to cough up its records on spitz what he learned was shocking in a six month period
[31:10.400 --> 31:16.960]  the company had logged his location 35 000 times often to within a few hundred yards of his precise
[31:16.960 --> 31:23.280]  location so the next time you turn on your cell phone know this your carrier is not only watching
[31:23.280 --> 31:29.200]  it's taking notes like dr kathryn albrecht for start page dot com the world's most private search
[31:29.200 --> 31:35.520]  engine did you know there are three million edible food plants on earth and none have the
[31:35.520 --> 31:40.880]  nutritional value of the hemp plant hemp usa dot org offers you hemp protein powder it does not
[31:40.880 --> 31:47.600]  contain chemicals or thc it's non-gmo and it's 100% gluten free hemp protein powder burns fat
[31:47.600 --> 31:55.360]  builds muscle contains 53% protein and feeds the body the nutrients it needs call 888-910-4367
[31:55.360 --> 32:03.840]  and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at this usa dot org rule of law radio
[32:03.840 --> 32:08.080]  is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar in today's america we live in us against them
[32:08.080 --> 32:12.000]  society if we the people are ever going to have a free society and we're going to have to stand
[32:12.000 --> 32:16.480]  and defend our own rights among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place the
[32:16.480 --> 32:20.640]  right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law
[32:20.640 --> 32:24.880]  traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.880 --> 32:29.200]  our rights through due process former sheriff's deputy a craig in conjunction with rule of law
[32:29.200 --> 32:32.720]  radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[32:32.720 --> 32:36.800]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law you can get your
[32:36.800 --> 32:40.880]  own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule of law radio dot com and ordering your
[32:40.880 --> 32:44.960]  copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation code
[32:44.960 --> 32:49.920]  the law versus the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents
[32:49.920 --> 32:53.440]  and other useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this
[32:53.440 --> 32:58.400]  material from rule of law radio dot com order your copy today and together we can have free society
[32:58.400 --> 33:10.720]  we all want and deserve you're listening to the logos radio network at logos radio network dot com
[33:10.720 --> 33:30.960]  okay we are back randy kelton rule of law radio on this friday the 31st day of march
[33:30.960 --> 33:38.480]  2017 and we're going to start by going to sunny in in georgia hello sunny
[33:38.480 --> 33:45.280]  hey good evening randy how are you doing i am doing good i don't care what my wife says
[33:46.560 --> 33:47.840]  over and over
[33:52.640 --> 33:55.440]  i'll i'll i'll let you deal with that uh
[33:59.040 --> 34:05.520]  my wife's a sweetheart uh the the ringer on her phone for me was a jackass break
[34:05.520 --> 34:14.240]  i don't know why she would do a thing like that we were recently in a mall and she was
[34:14.240 --> 34:21.280]  getting her fingernails done and i'm downstairs floating around i went to spencer's i found this
[34:21.280 --> 34:25.840]  great tool i called her to see if she's done and she said no they were drying them so i came up
[34:26.560 --> 34:31.520]  and walked into places about a half a dozen women sitting there and i told her i found this pin
[34:31.520 --> 34:38.320]  that's just what you need oh yeah what's that i held it up and it's is a brown pin and it said
[34:38.880 --> 34:46.480]  i have pooped today she looked up at that pin looked over these women and said that's why he has
[34:46.480 --> 34:57.600]  that ringer on his phone what oh well women just don't find me near as funny as i do okay what do
[34:57.600 --> 35:06.480]  you have for us today sonny well i had a couple questions one about the how to bring in the
[35:06.480 --> 35:19.600]  definition of vehicle from the united states code 18 usc 31 which ties a motor vehicle in with commerce
[35:19.600 --> 35:29.120]  and what my line of thinking was with the doctrine of preemption if the national traffic motor vehicle
[35:29.120 --> 35:37.840]  safety act brings in the definition of vehicle where the state has to conform their definition
[35:37.840 --> 35:43.360]  of vehicle with the feds definition for those particular things then wouldn't the definition
[35:43.360 --> 35:49.600]  of vehicle have to be the same for everything else within the state okay that's based on an unstated
[35:49.600 --> 35:56.240]  presupposition or an almost stated presupposition you made a proactive statement of law out of your
[35:56.240 --> 36:02.240]  own mouth and the proactive statement of law was is that the state definition has to conform to
[36:02.240 --> 36:08.000]  the federal definition and i understand the implication is because the states have for the
[36:08.000 --> 36:20.720]  most part adopted the federal transportation code but in a nutshell and in short no the state can
[36:20.720 --> 36:29.120]  have its own definition of transportation you cannot necessarily bring a definition
[36:30.000 --> 36:37.280]  from one code to another from one body of law to another one of the things that went around
[36:37.280 --> 36:41.760]  in the patriot community for quite a while and we don't get that on the show anymore because
[36:41.760 --> 36:50.800]  i get pretty excited about it is where people would take a word from some code and one of the
[36:50.800 --> 36:56.560]  favorite ones were pulling terms out of the internal revenue code and then bringing those
[36:56.560 --> 37:03.600]  terms and trying to use them in other codes and implying that the adjudication of this other
[37:03.600 --> 37:10.240]  code was incorrect because the term they used had a definition somewhere else that didn't
[37:10.240 --> 37:18.960]  fit with what they were doing you understand the problem was that something i do uh my question
[37:18.960 --> 37:27.600]  is well if the state is serving to their master the federal government oh stop another major
[37:27.600 --> 37:39.200]  presupposition and that one is blatantly wrong absolutely the state is not a servant to the
[37:39.840 --> 37:47.520]  federal government as their master in fact the state is the master the federal government is a
[37:47.520 --> 37:59.440]  organization created by a 13 sovereign states each one separate and sovereign in their own right
[38:00.560 --> 38:09.520]  that's why they call it a state and those 13 states they we won the revolution then we looked
[38:09.520 --> 38:18.560]  around and said each one of us individually is just not big enough to protect ourselves from the
[38:18.560 --> 38:28.080]  big bears out there so let's put together an agreement so that we can pool our resources
[38:28.080 --> 38:36.800]  and put together one army that would protect all of us and that's essentially what england was and
[38:36.800 --> 38:43.760]  all of these countries just kind of how they developed after the sacking of rome in 411 ad
[38:45.440 --> 38:51.200]  and europe fell into the dark ages where you had all of these warlords who could
[38:51.920 --> 38:58.480]  who were sovereign over the lands they could protect and gradually these warlords they
[38:59.520 --> 39:04.080]  spent all their time fighting with each other but if someone would come in from the outside but
[39:04.080 --> 39:10.320]  Germany Germany's only been a country for about 250 years before that it was a system of sovereign
[39:10.320 --> 39:16.160]  city states a duke in each state sovereign over the lands he could protect and they were always
[39:16.160 --> 39:21.520]  fighting with each other over boundaries and this kept their armies kept them reason for having
[39:21.520 --> 39:28.000]  the army and it kept them sharp if anybody came in from the outside all of these dukes had an
[39:28.000 --> 39:33.520]  agreement they would all get together pool their resources kick who that over that was out of here
[39:33.520 --> 39:38.640]  and then they go back to fighting amongst themselves england was the same way england was a
[39:40.320 --> 39:48.000]  group of dukes each sovereign in their own right and entered into an agreement where they would
[39:48.880 --> 39:56.240]  adopt one rule over that they would all adhere to so that they could in a crisis they could pool
[39:56.240 --> 40:04.480]  their their armies well the states were the same way and we dictate to the federal government
[40:04.480 --> 40:11.200]  what it can do and we the states agree to follow certain rules amongst each other am i making sense
[40:11.200 --> 40:20.800]  something yes yes you are okay so so the state is a sovereign entity all on its own when the fed
[40:20.800 --> 40:28.400]  if the fed came in and tried to impose its definitions on the state the state's going to
[40:28.400 --> 40:34.880]  toss them out of here so we can't go there we can't depend on what the fed says if we're
[40:34.880 --> 40:40.560]  going to define terms within a statutory structure in the state we have to define it
[40:40.560 --> 40:49.920]  from the state's definition unless the state doesn't have one if the state doesn't have one
[40:49.920 --> 40:57.440]  then under full faith and credit we can go to another state and pull it one of the things that
[40:57.440 --> 41:08.800]  the courts do is they trust the legislature legislators of other states and if they the
[41:08.800 --> 41:16.080]  legislature of let's say oklahoma no no we can't yeah oklahoma we can ask you we can't use Louisiana
[41:16.080 --> 41:23.280]  that's that's a whole different country it's a legislators in oklahoma have defined an issue
[41:24.960 --> 41:35.280]  and texas hasn't defined that issue then we can go to oklahoma and pull that definition into texas
[41:35.280 --> 41:46.720]  but only for advisory purposes and only if the state has not addressed it makes sense
[41:48.720 --> 42:00.720]  yes yes it does i know there are there are a lot of people who have a different opinion of
[42:00.720 --> 42:08.320]  whether the states are still sovereign or whether say around the civil war
[42:10.160 --> 42:16.480]  that that sovereignty wasn't taken away not only for the south but but for the north as well
[42:17.760 --> 42:24.480]  there is some issue as to whether or not we lost our sovereignty as this falls a war but in fact
[42:24.480 --> 42:33.760]  no we did not we the states have given up some of their sovereignty in certain areas but the
[42:33.760 --> 42:41.920]  states have done that the federal government hasn't usurped the states we just had a recent ruling
[42:42.960 --> 42:50.240]  there's a mall here in texas that i go to quite often it's northeast mall in the north east side
[42:50.240 --> 42:57.360]  of forward it's in between dallas and forward it was pretty good size indoor mall and to the south
[42:57.360 --> 43:04.960]  of it there was a area there that the mall wanted to purchase so they could expand the mall but it's
[43:04.960 --> 43:08.800]  owned by a bunch of people there's a whole neighborhood there and they didn't want to sell
[43:09.920 --> 43:18.880]  so the mall went to this to the city and asked the city to condemn all that property and take it
[43:18.880 --> 43:26.800]  under imminent domain and sell it to the mall because the mall would produce greater tax revenue
[43:27.520 --> 43:36.960]  than the residential properties taxes were created big fight went to the supreme and when the
[43:37.600 --> 43:45.600]  the decision come down from the supreme because the individuals were saying the state can't just
[43:45.600 --> 43:51.840]  come in here and steal our property this is our personal property they can't come steal it and
[43:51.840 --> 43:55.440]  so he went to the federal government so you got to stop the state from doing this garbage
[43:56.560 --> 43:59.360]  and the feds looked at it and said we're not
[44:02.400 --> 44:07.680]  hello my name is steward smith from natures pure organics.com and i would like to invite you to
[44:07.680 --> 44:13.520]  come by our store at 1904 waterloo street sweet d here in austin texas behind brave new books and
[44:13.520 --> 44:18.800]  chasing to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes have a look at
[44:18.800 --> 44:23.360]  our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine take a peek at some of
[44:23.360 --> 44:28.560]  our other wonderful products including our australian emu oil lotion candles olive oil soaps
[44:28.560 --> 44:37.280]  and colloidal silver and gold call 512-264-4043 or find us online at natures pure organics.com
[44:37.280 --> 44:45.040]  that's 512-264-4043 natures pure organics.com don't forget to like us on facebook for information
[44:45.040 --> 44:48.800]  on events and our products natures pure organics.com
[45:01.120 --> 45:06.000]  are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney
[45:06.000 --> 45:12.000]  with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand four cd course that will show you
[45:12.000 --> 45:19.840]  how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't
[45:19.840 --> 45:26.160]  have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our step by step course
[45:26.160 --> 45:32.880]  and now you can too jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[45:32.880 --> 45:38.320]  winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.320 --> 45:44.080]  understand about the principles and practices that control our american courts you'll receive
[45:44.080 --> 45:52.720]  our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases prosa tactics and much more please
[45:52.720 --> 46:08.640]  visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the banner are called toll free 866 law easy
[46:08.640 --> 46:25.520]  okay we are back when you go to the radio but anyway in that case the federal government
[46:25.520 --> 46:34.400]  said absolutely not we're not going to touch it that is a state issue and if the citizens of the
[46:34.400 --> 46:40.640]  state of texas want to change state law so that the government cannot take their property under
[46:40.640 --> 46:48.240]  imminent domain because someone else would can collect more tax revenue then they will have to
[46:48.240 --> 46:53.680]  change state law we're not going to go in and mandate we have no power and i thought that was
[46:53.680 --> 47:02.160]  a very good ruling that's my story i'm sticking to it so back to sunny and i'll try not to interrupt
[47:02.160 --> 47:08.640]  you the only reason i'm doing that son is you know we have a large audience so you pretty well
[47:08.640 --> 47:13.600]  you're pretty up on most of this so you kind of know what i'm talking about i'm really doing this
[47:13.600 --> 47:18.880]  for everybody who's not sure so i'm not being pedantic and certainly not picking on you because
[47:18.880 --> 47:25.600]  i appreciate you you've been around a while and you stayed in the fight okay back to you well
[47:25.600 --> 47:34.240]  well yeah um i'm gonna keep researching that um because i'm not fully persuaded but i completely
[47:34.240 --> 47:39.360]  understand where you're coming from and i really hope hope that you that you're right but i'd like
[47:39.360 --> 47:48.400]  to ask you about um uh kind of a i don't know if it'd be a trial technique um but on making sure
[47:48.400 --> 47:57.520]  that the burden of proof of jurisdiction how do you move that to the prosecutor because the the
[47:57.520 --> 48:06.800]  court seems to take the position that we have the burden of proof of proving that they don't have
[48:06.800 --> 48:16.640]  jurisdiction do you see what i'm asking yes yes i do and i have mucho case law that says that is
[48:16.640 --> 48:26.160]  not the case and once you challenge subject matter jurisdiction the judge needs to understand
[48:26.160 --> 48:34.080]  that he steps up in front of the line of fire it is not the prosecution that has to prove up
[48:34.080 --> 48:42.560]  subject matter jurisdiction it is the court and i have case law that's very clear on that point
[48:42.560 --> 48:52.080]  subject matter jurisdiction is threshold if you can't get past subject matter jurisdiction you
[48:52.080 --> 49:01.120]  can't get to the elements and if the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction the court
[49:01.120 --> 49:10.800]  is acting in its personal capacity it is impersonating a public official and is subject to all the
[49:10.800 --> 49:19.280]  laws relating to impersonating a public official lawyers tend not to take the court to task on
[49:19.280 --> 49:28.480]  that but i have a certain judge in north texas who ignored a subject matter jurisdiction challenge
[49:28.480 --> 49:37.360]  actually i've got a lot number of them and this particular one took this position on a property
[49:37.360 --> 49:44.800]  in which i had a mechanics lien filed and the mechanics lien has been in the record for over
[49:44.800 --> 49:52.480]  four years so it's unchallengeable he took a subject matter jurisdiction when it was challenged
[49:52.480 --> 50:00.240]  and ignored the challenge and moved ahead i'm going to sue him personally see how that works out for
[50:00.240 --> 50:10.000]  him so if the if the judge is not taking subject matter jurisdiction serious then send me an email
[50:10.000 --> 50:18.480]  i'll send you the case law and write a tort letter to him send him a notice of tort an opportunity
[50:18.480 --> 50:32.800]  to cure that gives attention then move to disqualify him that's my story i'm sticking to it what about
[50:32.800 --> 50:41.040]  territorial jurisdiction i've been uh reading some of ed reveria's uh stuff and he likes to
[50:41.040 --> 50:50.960]  challenge territorial jurisdiction basically making them prove that the body of law they're
[50:50.960 --> 51:01.520]  trying to enforce has to attach to a certain area of land and so the territorial jurisdictional
[51:01.520 --> 51:07.920]  challenge would challenge whether their law actually applies to that land they would actually
[51:07.920 --> 51:15.360]  have to own that land and so what do you think about the territorial jurisdiction that's that is
[51:16.080 --> 51:25.840]  that's generally very straightforward the say it's a municipality the boundaries of the municipality
[51:25.840 --> 51:33.760]  are very strictly defined the extraterritorial jurisdiction that attached to those boundaries
[51:33.760 --> 51:44.640]  will also be very strictly defined my daughter lives in the country they have a cattle farm
[51:45.760 --> 51:52.720]  but they're close to bridgeport texas and bridgeport texas has followed texas state law and
[51:52.720 --> 52:00.240]  extended their extraterritorial jurisdiction to encompass the land that my daughter's farm is on
[52:00.240 --> 52:11.200]  but that's very specifically defined in statute and always will be so relatively simple issue to
[52:11.200 --> 52:19.760]  address at least for the jurisdiction there may be an aspect that ed is going to that i'm not familiar
[52:19.760 --> 52:30.320]  with yeah that um the the take that uh it river takes is that um
[52:33.200 --> 52:42.880]  there's a california uh statute that says that california and the united states are uh
[52:42.880 --> 52:55.040]  uh inseparably uh connected and the uh united states code uh defines what a county is that it's a
[52:55.040 --> 53:08.480]  federal territory um and using the the definitions um of the united states code of what county and
[53:08.480 --> 53:19.840]  state are and what and how how the states uh reciprocate those those definitions it it becomes
[53:20.560 --> 53:27.760]  something that goes all the way back to the uh uh treaty of paris when when the king gave up
[53:28.640 --> 53:35.040]  his rights to the land and the people the private owners became kings of that land
[53:35.040 --> 53:44.160]  holding the high title you talked about 1848 when the revolution yes and and so back back
[53:44.160 --> 53:51.360]  and so ed reverie he'll bring the four organic laws uh the article of confederation the the
[53:51.360 --> 53:59.280]  declaration of independence the uh northwest ordinance and the uh constitution of the united
[53:59.280 --> 54:10.000]  states uh the he'll he'll bring those into the uh case um make make them take a judicial notice
[54:11.120 --> 54:21.760]  of that and basically it comes down to uh their law can only apply to the land that they own
[54:21.760 --> 54:28.960]  not to private property that they don't actually have uh title q
[54:30.800 --> 54:37.040]  am i making any sense yeah we're talking to like the issue of a loyal title
[54:38.560 --> 54:46.320]  and yes i understand that the the problem with the application of that is if you have not brought
[54:46.320 --> 54:53.520]  forth your land patent then you're not going to fall under and most people have not brought the
[54:53.520 --> 55:01.680]  land patent forward because there are other issues involved of police and fire protection to be one
[55:01.680 --> 55:08.640]  very serious one if you've brought your land patent forward then you stand as that sovereign
[55:08.640 --> 55:18.000]  in the capacity the french spoke to and essentially the state law doesn't apply on your private
[55:18.000 --> 55:26.000]  property but if you haven't brought the patent forward and you own hold the property under title
[55:27.600 --> 55:35.840]  then the jurisdiction of the state extends within those boundaries does ed talk about land patent
[55:35.840 --> 55:46.560]  um he he does he does uh in especially in the in the sense that when when the king relinquish
[55:46.560 --> 55:56.000]  his rights to the uh to the title of the land the the only entity that can hold that highest title
[55:56.000 --> 56:03.680]  would be a king or a monarchial type figure a a corporation or a government can't actually
[56:03.680 --> 56:13.120]  hold that highest title so the his take is that the people have been tricked into not really
[56:13.120 --> 56:20.960]  exercising their their right and sort of being sort of uh uh shut shut along and and into uh
[56:20.960 --> 56:27.600]  paying these property taxes and different things when they don't actually have to um they just need
[56:27.600 --> 56:36.560]  to go back and and inform the tax assessors um that they don't own that land and so they don't
[56:37.200 --> 56:42.800]  so now they don't have a right to issue a tax upon it it's only the monarch or the king
[56:43.600 --> 56:49.920]  that has the right to actually tax the the land because he actually owns it and is just
[56:49.920 --> 56:59.200]  basically uh leasing the right to use it here we need Harman Taylor and he can explain this part
[56:59.200 --> 57:08.240]  and and I agree with everything you said the thing we're missing is that most of us have entered
[57:08.240 --> 57:20.400]  entered into a contract with the state wherein we give the state this authority if you hold your property
[57:21.360 --> 57:31.280]  by deed then this deed refers to a title the title is a lien held by the state
[57:31.280 --> 57:38.720]  that's the part they don't tell you the title that's registered with the county courters office
[57:40.240 --> 57:46.640]  records the lien and this is the way it come about i'm in texas and texas was a sovereign nation
[57:47.920 --> 57:55.680]  and once it texas wanted sovereignty it held all of this property but it didn't want to hold
[57:55.680 --> 58:00.320]  all this property wanted the people to hold the property so they could make it productive
[58:00.320 --> 58:08.400]  so they broke up the state into large land grants and some small land grants they granted
[58:08.400 --> 58:16.640]  property to individuals and they sold a vast majority of it to individuals but most of the
[58:16.640 --> 58:22.480]  people didn't have any money so they couldn't pay for it so they said okay guys we will create a
[58:22.480 --> 58:28.640]  lien against the property and allow you to pay off the property and the lien is what we was registered
[58:28.640 --> 58:35.920]  with the county courters office as a title that was the lien against the property and once the
[58:36.480 --> 58:43.200]  the state was paid for the property you could move to have that lien removed in the form of
[58:43.200 --> 58:51.520]  bringing forward your land patent then you fall off the tax rolls would you like to make more
[58:51.520 --> 58:57.600]  definite progress in your walk with god bibles for america is offering a free study bible
[58:57.600 --> 59:03.040]  and a set of free christian books that can really help the new testament recovery version is one of
[59:03.040 --> 59:08.640]  the most comprehensive study bibles available today it's an accurate translation and it contains
[59:08.640 --> 59:14.320]  thousands of footnotes that will help you to know god and to know the meaning of life the free books
[59:14.320 --> 59:20.080]  are a three volume set called basic elements of the christian life chapter by chapter basic
[59:20.080 --> 59:26.240]  elements of the christian life clearly presents god's plan of salvation growing in christ and how
[59:26.240 --> 59:32.400]  to build up the church to order your free new testament recovery version and basic elements
[59:32.400 --> 59:44.560]  of the christian life call bibles for america toll free at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102
[59:44.560 --> 59:55.040]  or visit us online at bfa.org live free speech radio logos radio network dot com
[01:00:00.480 --> 01:00:06.400]  the following use flash is brought to you by the low star blowdown markets for wednesday the 29th
[01:00:06.400 --> 01:00:11.120]  of march 2017 are currently trading with gold one thousand two hundred fifty three dollars in three
[01:00:11.120 --> 01:00:15.840]  cents an ounce silver eighteen dollars and twenty cents an ounce texas crude forty dollars and thirty
[01:00:15.840 --> 01:00:23.280]  seven cents a barrel and bitcoin is sitting at a thousand forty three u.s currency today in history
[01:00:23.280 --> 01:00:29.040]  the year 1882 the might of columbus the world's largest catholic fraternal service organization
[01:00:29.040 --> 01:00:33.600]  are established originally serving as a mutual benefit society to work in class and immigrant
[01:00:33.600 --> 01:00:37.760]  catholics in the united states it developed into a fraternal benefit society dedicated to
[01:00:37.760 --> 01:00:43.120]  providing terrible services promoting catholic education and catholic public policy and actively
[01:00:43.120 --> 01:00:48.560]  defending catholicism in various nations with roughly two million members consisting of catholic
[01:00:48.560 --> 01:00:53.840]  men age 18 and older in nearly 15 000 councils the night of columbus consists of four different
[01:00:53.840 --> 01:00:59.360]  degrees and the order is a member of the international alliance of catholic knights the kfc
[01:00:59.360 --> 01:01:06.960]  founded today in history in recent years david robert daily eiden and sandra marit were charged
[01:01:06.960 --> 01:01:11.680]  tuesday yesterday by california attorney general xavier basera with 15 felony counts of violating
[01:01:11.680 --> 01:01:16.320]  the privacy of health care providers if you recall they are the two anti-abortion activists who pose
[01:01:16.320 --> 01:01:21.040]  as alternative identities in a fictitious bio research company to meet plant parenthood officials
[01:01:21.040 --> 01:01:25.600]  secretly recording their conversations leading to the selling of fetal tissue in organs for profit
[01:01:25.600 --> 01:01:32.480]  scandal the charge consists of 14 instances between october 2013 and july of 2015 where daily
[01:01:32.480 --> 01:01:37.440]  eiden emirate filmed planned parenthood personnel without permission they're facing a felony count
[01:01:37.440 --> 01:01:41.840]  for each person they discreetly recorded along with an additional felony charge for criminal
[01:01:41.840 --> 01:01:46.880]  conspiracy to invade privacy mary alice carter interim vice president of communications for
[01:01:46.880 --> 01:01:51.840]  plant parenthood federation of america said in a statement tuesday that the nationwide investigation
[01:01:51.840 --> 01:01:56.160]  have made it clear that plant parenthood has done nothing wrong and that only people who broke the
[01:01:56.160 --> 01:02:04.480]  law are those behind the fraudulent tapes abidemi jiboy assistant professor at case western reserve
[01:02:04.480 --> 01:02:09.840]  university lead author of a research paper published yesterday tuesday in the lenset stated that we
[01:02:09.840 --> 01:02:14.640]  have been able to make the electrical signals which represent thoughts and use that to control
[01:02:14.640 --> 01:02:20.320]  simulations of the arm and hand this experimental new technology is being called neuro prosthetics
[01:02:20.320 --> 01:02:24.880]  expected to be available to the general public in five to ten years the tech relies on creating an
[01:02:24.880 --> 01:02:29.360]  entirely new neurological central nervous connection between the brain and a paralyzed limb
[01:02:29.360 --> 01:02:34.240]  by implanting an electrode array which is used to detect and record and break signals from the
[01:02:34.240 --> 01:02:38.800]  motor cortex of the brain and then uses those signals to actuate movements from mechanical
[01:02:38.800 --> 01:02:44.480]  limbs robber cursed a professor of biomedical engineering at case western told npr essentially
[01:02:44.480 --> 01:02:49.840]  that we have an algorithm that sort of transforms neural signals into movement and that the code
[01:02:49.840 --> 01:02:57.360]  is in our brain this was rick roadie with your lowdown for march 29 2017
[01:03:04.880 --> 01:03:08.320]  it's all according to the well of the almighty
[01:03:08.320 --> 01:03:19.040]  me
[01:03:19.040 --> 01:03:26.160]  okay we are back randy kelton rooval radio we're talking to sonny in georgia and sonny
[01:03:26.160 --> 01:03:36.480]  me i don't see a conflict here but i also see that it does not apply to most properties
[01:03:38.320 --> 01:03:44.480]  this does it does this position makes sense now no way i'm not asking if you agree it's true
[01:03:44.480 --> 01:03:49.040]  because it may not be but it has the appearance does it have the appearance of true
[01:03:49.040 --> 01:03:58.560]  oh we can probably hear you better if you're unmuted okay sorry about that
[01:03:59.760 --> 01:04:05.600]  good go ahead sonny i thought you were sounding especially intelligent there
[01:04:08.480 --> 01:04:13.680]  yeah my that that could be uh maybe the ringtone that my wife has for me
[01:04:13.680 --> 01:04:30.720]  okay the territorial challenge uh at least from uh its perspective gets back to who owns
[01:04:30.720 --> 01:04:41.200]  the land and and okay who owns that road and so far no one uh and paul hanson is a much better
[01:04:41.200 --> 01:04:49.600]  student than i am of of this and has won many uh cases where they're not able to prove that
[01:04:50.240 --> 01:04:59.440]  their their code and their law applies to the the road where they're trying to enforce
[01:05:00.480 --> 01:05:08.400]  um the the law they they keep okay okay now you're going now you're going exactly where i
[01:05:08.400 --> 01:05:17.360]  like to go at the end of the day it doesn't matter if their law applies or not and in his
[01:05:17.360 --> 01:05:24.640]  questionnaire i was putting together for traffic tickets there's one of the issues i brought is
[01:05:25.680 --> 01:05:35.600]  did the officer issue a citation and in that citation did he make statements
[01:05:35.600 --> 01:05:44.960]  to show that the individual fell within the statutory scheme and i asked it that way because
[01:05:45.680 --> 01:05:51.840]  it doesn't matter if you fall within the statutory scheme or not what matters is
[01:05:52.800 --> 01:06:00.880]  does the charge allege with sufficient specificity that you fall within the statutory scheme
[01:06:00.880 --> 01:06:08.080]  so that that sounds like exactly where you're going uh yeah maybe it i do fall under it but
[01:06:08.080 --> 01:06:16.000]  you can't prove it so when you come to the court and you make a proactive statement of law you
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:21.600]  can't make that out of your own mouth you have to make it out of the mouth of the legislature
[01:06:21.600 --> 01:06:30.080]  if you can't do it hit road jack does that make sense to you sonny yeah yeah that that's where i
[01:06:30.080 --> 01:06:37.520]  was sort of getting into to the the burden of proof where it appears that the the judge tries to
[01:06:39.280 --> 01:06:48.960]  get us to prove that we are innocent rather than us having the the presumption that that we already
[01:06:48.960 --> 01:06:55.840]  are and that they have to prove that we're guilty and it's almost as if they they
[01:06:55.840 --> 01:07:03.040]  they want for us to do all the proving and not make the prosecution prove much much at all at least
[01:07:03.040 --> 01:07:09.280]  as far as jurisdiction goes just and i agree and that's because most people don't know how to fight
[01:07:09.280 --> 01:07:23.040]  them and they can bully their way around it goes back to the case law that says rights belong to the
[01:07:23.040 --> 01:07:30.080]  and to the doctrine of latches you'll hear that on occasion lat this person removed to dismiss
[01:07:30.800 --> 01:07:41.040]  latches latches means you have rights that you fail to address if you don't claim them then you
[01:07:41.040 --> 01:07:49.520]  waive them is the court's position in most cases concerning rights so even if the court doesn't
[01:07:49.520 --> 01:07:55.840]  have subject matter jurisdiction if you don't challenge that subject matter jurisdiction
[01:07:56.960 --> 01:08:03.680]  then it is as if they do have subject matter jurisdiction and then when the court when you
[01:08:03.680 --> 01:08:11.840]  challenge it and the court fails to prove up subject matter jurisdiction and moves ahead anyway
[01:08:11.840 --> 01:08:22.960]  well they can do that if we don't exercise the rights that we have we have remedy for that
[01:08:24.400 --> 01:08:28.080]  sue the judge personally file criminally against the judge with a grand jury
[01:08:30.240 --> 01:08:36.480]  we don't do that for the most part so we let the judges get away with it because we don't
[01:08:36.480 --> 01:08:43.840]  exercise the rights that we have to secure remedy so they can pretty much do anything they want to
[01:08:43.840 --> 01:08:50.240]  if you and i as the masters of the servants don't take them to task for it
[01:08:53.920 --> 01:08:58.480]  yeah and that's a that's a i really like i'm going to look try to look up that case
[01:08:58.480 --> 01:09:04.560]  following the rights belong to the belligerent litigant because uh just just go online and
[01:09:04.560 --> 01:09:11.200]  type in belligerent litigant you can hit right on it yeah that'd be good to be able to give the
[01:09:11.200 --> 01:09:21.120]  judge when he starts threatening you with a contempt oh when a judge threatens you with contempt
[01:09:22.400 --> 01:09:31.200]  there's another way to go about it if you didn't call the judge of a foul name or make a threat
[01:09:31.200 --> 01:09:38.320]  against the judge to do something do something illegal and i have someone in jail in colorado
[01:09:38.320 --> 01:09:45.920]  that i'm trying to help get out he's accused of threatening to sue a public official and i want
[01:09:45.920 --> 01:09:57.200]  to say whoa you cannot threaten to sue you cannot threaten to do what the law allows you to do
[01:09:57.200 --> 01:10:05.120]  that's giving notice that's not a threat so let me be back to to the judge and contempt
[01:10:06.880 --> 01:10:14.320]  the judge will have to file contempt for you doing something that you are not allowed to do
[01:10:15.680 --> 01:10:22.240]  if the judge files contempt because you challenge his jurisdiction and demand they prove it up
[01:10:22.240 --> 01:10:30.960]  then you weigh the contempt allegation against witness tampering statute
[01:10:33.200 --> 01:10:39.760]  because when a judge tells me he doesn't want to hear anything about the constitution in this court
[01:10:41.120 --> 01:10:47.520]  and i insist that he does and he threatens me with contempt that goes to witness tampering
[01:10:47.520 --> 01:10:54.160]  yeah and i'm going to ask we're going to decide do i go to jail for contempt or does the judge go
[01:10:54.160 --> 01:11:01.840]  to jail for witness tampering an obstruction we see how that works for you judge there's two sides
[01:11:01.840 --> 01:11:13.120]  to that one i have a feeling i might go first but i don't take that well i'm when i walk into
[01:11:13.120 --> 01:11:18.720]  that court have a courtroom they're all public servants i am the master and i will not have
[01:11:18.720 --> 01:11:26.880]  one of my servants speaking to me disrespectfully judge raises his voice to me i'm going to ask him
[01:11:26.880 --> 01:11:33.920]  get down off that bench it is your duty to determine the facts in accordance with the rules
[01:11:33.920 --> 01:11:38.560]  of evidence and apply the laws that comes to you the facts in the case if you have yourself another
[01:11:38.560 --> 01:11:45.200]  agenda you need to take that home and use it on your wife and your children do not bring it into
[01:11:45.200 --> 01:11:52.240]  my courtroom then i tell the baby arrest that judge every time i've asked the bailiff to arrest
[01:11:52.240 --> 01:11:59.760]  the judge in the courtroom the judge has sat there and kept his mouth shut because he knows
[01:11:59.760 --> 01:12:09.040]  what he just stepped off into i'm making a criminal accusation against the judge to the bailiff does
[01:12:09.040 --> 01:12:17.760]  the judge you really want to interfere with me that gets real deep real fast and a lot of times
[01:12:17.760 --> 01:12:24.000]  that's a good way i have every time i've challenged a judge for his attitude they've always fixed it
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:35.120]  they only have an attitude because they get away with it and you and i we the most formative years
[01:12:35.120 --> 01:12:42.000]  of our life we spend in a in a government mandated school system dealing with public officials that
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:50.560]  have statutory authority over us while we're in that school system we are constantly told what
[01:12:50.560 --> 01:12:58.560]  a great and wonderful system of government we have we live in a land of law ruled by the rights of
[01:12:58.560 --> 01:13:06.320]  the individual the inalienable rights of the individual however while you're in this school
[01:13:07.120 --> 01:13:13.280]  don't even think of trying to express one of those rights that the whole weight of this system will
[01:13:13.280 --> 01:13:19.760]  land right square on your head we put our children through 12 years of that hypocrisy put them out
[01:13:19.760 --> 01:13:24.560]  on the street where they don't deal with public officials anymore and all of a sudden we expect
[01:13:24.560 --> 01:13:33.840]  them to be fully functioning sovereign individuals well they may be until they deal with the government
[01:13:33.840 --> 01:13:39.520]  again and when they get called into court on a traffic ticket they go inside and look for the
[01:13:39.520 --> 01:13:47.040]  behavioral set that they have developed for dealing with public officials well hadn't dealt with public
[01:13:47.040 --> 01:13:53.440]  officials since they got out of school so they go back and get that tool set they used in school
[01:13:55.200 --> 01:14:02.960]  i've watched this older gentleman a really expensive suit he had the error of a business
[01:14:02.960 --> 01:14:10.960]  executive walked into court on a traffic ticket that were hardly bought one of the buttons on
[01:14:10.960 --> 01:14:18.320]  his suit the fine would have and tried to speak to the judge was holding some paperwork that were
[01:14:18.320 --> 01:14:25.280]  the paperwork was shaking so badly he could barely he could absolutely couldn't read it he could barely
[01:14:25.280 --> 01:14:32.480]  speak and i thought what in the world is going on here he certainly didn't have that demeanor
[01:14:32.480 --> 01:14:38.080]  out in the hall before the trial started but as soon as he stepped up in front of that judge
[01:14:38.080 --> 01:14:48.000]  internally he wouldn't access this response set most of what i do on this show is about
[01:14:49.920 --> 01:14:56.720]  developing a internal mental tool that would allow us to reframe the situation
[01:14:58.400 --> 01:15:03.440]  so that when we step up in front of our public officials instead of going inside and accessing
[01:15:03.440 --> 01:15:11.280]  that tool set that we learned when we were in school we access the tool set we use when we go
[01:15:11.280 --> 01:15:17.120]  see the principal wanting to know what the heck he's doing to our kids that pulls a whole different
[01:15:17.120 --> 01:15:23.520]  response set that's the one we need to use when we walk into the courtroom and a lot of these
[01:15:23.520 --> 01:15:31.120]  problems will just simply go away does that make sense sonny it does it sort of sort of brings
[01:15:31.120 --> 01:15:39.520]  up one more question with those judges uh how do you how do you think they learn to manipulate
[01:15:40.240 --> 01:15:45.360]  people like they do are they taught that through a book or do you think they get that in a private
[01:15:45.360 --> 01:15:52.480]  seminar uh no it's it's it's implicit it is implicit all that for the most part most of
[01:15:52.480 --> 01:16:02.240]  these judges uh were lawyers first and the judges taught the lawyers as they were they're coming up
[01:16:02.240 --> 01:16:08.640]  they learn how to deal with judges justices of the peace they're pretty well taught in training
[01:16:08.640 --> 01:16:14.000]  courses how to deal with the public they've got to have all sorts of courses for that uh had a
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:18.960]  friend of mine get hired at the local sheriff's department as a jail guard but before she could
[01:16:18.960 --> 01:16:25.360]  start to work in the jail she had to go to Denton the next county over and go to a course on how
[01:16:25.360 --> 01:16:32.400]  to deal with difficult people and they held up someone as an example and when they called out
[01:16:32.400 --> 01:16:36.560]  my name she said she kind of ducked to look around and said I know that guy
[01:16:39.520 --> 01:16:43.200]  they they go through these courses on how to deal with us so yeah they're trained
[01:16:43.200 --> 01:16:50.480]  we need to retrain them hang on about to go to break the first time I didn't walk off the cliff
[01:16:50.480 --> 01:16:55.680]  today so I'm getting better randy kelton rule of law radio we'll be right back
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:04.880]  I love logos without the shows on this network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends I'm so
[01:17:04.880 --> 01:17:10.240]  addicted to the truth now that there's no going back I need my truth fit I'd be lost without logos
[01:17:10.240 --> 01:17:14.800]  and I really want to help keep this network on the air I'd love to volunteer as a show producer
[01:17:14.800 --> 01:17:19.360]  but I'm a bit of a luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on
[01:17:19.360 --> 01:17:25.680]  supplements how can I help logos well I'm glad you asked whenever you order anything from amazon
[01:17:25.680 --> 01:17:30.720]  you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts first thing you do is clear your
[01:17:30.720 --> 01:17:38.160]  cookies now go to logos radio network dot com check on the amazon logo and book market now when you
[01:17:38.160 --> 01:17:44.880]  order anything from amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos do I pay extra no do you
[01:17:44.880 --> 01:17:51.760]  have to do anything different when I order no can I use my amazon prime no I mean yes wow giving
[01:17:51.760 --> 01:17:58.560]  without doing anything or spending any money this is perfect thank you so much we are welcome happy
[01:17:58.560 --> 01:18:04.960]  holidays logos are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even lawsuits
[01:18:04.960 --> 01:18:11.280]  stop debt collectors now with the michael mirris proven method michael mirris has won six cases in
[01:18:11.280 --> 01:18:16.560]  federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too you'll get step-by-step instructions
[01:18:16.560 --> 01:18:21.840]  in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute what to do when
[01:18:21.840 --> 01:18:27.120]  contacted by phones mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get
[01:18:27.120 --> 01:18:32.560]  debt collectors out of your credit report how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay
[01:18:32.560 --> 01:18:38.880]  you to go away the michael mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[01:18:38.880 --> 01:18:44.000]  personal consultation is available as well for more information please visit rule of law radio
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:49.680]  dot com and click on the blue michael mirris banner or email michael mirris at yahoo dot com
[01:18:49.680 --> 01:18:58.240]  that's rule of law radio dot com or email m i c h a e l m i r r a s at yahoo dot com to learn how to
[01:18:58.240 --> 01:19:07.040]  stop debt collectors now the logos the logos radio net video
[01:19:15.280 --> 01:19:16.800]  ain't gonna blind me
[01:19:20.800 --> 01:19:22.000]  don't want me
[01:19:22.000 --> 01:19:24.000]  me
[01:19:27.520 --> 01:19:28.000]  well
[01:19:31.520 --> 01:19:34.160]  ain't gonna fool me with that today
[01:19:37.360 --> 01:19:42.400]  okay randy kelton rule of law radio and we're talking to sonny and georgia do you have
[01:19:42.400 --> 01:19:44.080]  any more questions or comments
[01:19:46.960 --> 01:19:51.600]  that'd be pretty pretty much it for now i i just want to thank you for uh for all the hard work
[01:19:51.600 --> 01:19:57.120]  that you do and the sacrifice you put in uh i think you probably sacrifice more than we'll
[01:19:57.120 --> 01:20:03.280]  probably ever know but i just want to say thank you you are welcome this is my job
[01:20:05.280 --> 01:20:14.000]  i kind of feel like i have a debt to pay and if you have to pay your debt it's okay to have fun
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:24.320]  doing it took a long time getting there but uh it has gotten to be a lot more fun and to
[01:20:24.320 --> 01:20:31.200]  certainly is it is rewarding enough personally that it paid back for all i do and i but i am
[01:20:31.200 --> 01:20:37.760]  very glad to hear that some folks appreciate what we do thank you sonny now we're going to go to
[01:20:37.760 --> 01:20:49.280]  to syria in california okay syria called in last night and i sidetracked him on to issues of foreclosure
[01:20:50.560 --> 01:20:56.560]  and that wasn't exactly where he wanted to go so tonight we're going to talk about
[01:20:56.560 --> 01:21:08.400]  fighting complaints against federal judges right hello syria hi randy how are you i am good
[01:21:08.960 --> 01:21:17.280]  yeah okay so uh so um there there's no question that several judges have been
[01:21:17.280 --> 01:21:26.400]  in acting outside of the jurisdiction and independent of hotter or i submit my complaints
[01:21:26.960 --> 01:21:36.880]  they find base of twisting the statues and basically running over my numerous non-judicial
[01:21:36.880 --> 01:21:41.600]  judgment that have been endorsed by all three branches of the government
[01:21:41.600 --> 01:21:53.040]  uh such as for example the unanimous decision by jessie noski as well as tila and uh 12 cfr
[01:21:53.040 --> 01:21:59.840]  two two six point five point one five d one two and three which basically says that okay wait
[01:21:59.840 --> 01:22:09.760]  wait wait let's not get lost in the specific details of your case quite yet let's talk about
[01:22:09.760 --> 01:22:18.800]  liability of the judge and subject matter jurisdiction but it is the duty of the court to
[01:22:18.800 --> 01:22:24.240]  determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence that apply the laws that comes to him
[01:22:24.240 --> 01:22:31.040]  to the facts in the case and what the courts will tell you that if you come into court and i render
[01:22:31.040 --> 01:22:40.400]  a bogus ruling well that's okay because you can appeal my decision to a court of appeals i once
[01:22:40.400 --> 01:22:47.200]  bushwhacked the head criminal district judge for tarant county texas is on courtroom with
[01:22:47.200 --> 01:22:54.720]  criminal complaints against all the highest judges in texas and he said oh mr galton uh you really
[01:22:54.720 --> 01:23:02.560]  need to take these to uh a magistrate he said i'm a district judge in district judges in uh he said
[01:23:02.560 --> 01:23:07.440]  i need to take it to the justice of the piece he said i'm a federal district judge and district
[01:23:07.440 --> 01:23:12.960]  judges in texas don't take criminal complaints i said well that's okay your honor i'm not here to
[01:23:12.960 --> 01:23:18.560]  invoke your duty as a district judge i'm here to invoke your duty as a magistrate and that's a duty
[01:23:18.560 --> 01:23:26.000]  from which you may not shield yourself and then he went on to insist that i should uh
[01:23:27.360 --> 01:23:31.840]  these were criminal complaints i should make my complaints to the sheriff so i did that judge
[01:23:32.720 --> 01:23:37.680]  they threw him in the trash he said well you should appeal to the district court for a
[01:23:37.680 --> 01:23:45.680]  written mandamus so i cut him off i said oh judge don't ask me to appeal you go before i'm a corrupt
[01:23:45.680 --> 01:23:52.160]  judge and they render a bogus ruling and everybody says oh that's okay you can go before you can appeal
[01:23:52.160 --> 01:23:57.440]  to a whole panel of corrupt judges and they'll really screw your royal and he kind of laughed and
[01:23:57.440 --> 01:24:03.040]  said well mr galton i don't think it's quite that bad i said that's because you're not pro se i have
[01:24:03.040 --> 01:24:10.720]  a better idea i'll appeal to a grand jury he said well mr galton you can't appeal to a grand
[01:24:10.720 --> 01:24:16.640]  jurors of course i can i could appeal to the grand jury to indict the sheriff for felony
[01:24:16.640 --> 01:24:25.760]  shielding from prosecution violation of 3805 penal code okay my point here is if a public official
[01:24:25.760 --> 01:24:36.880]  exerts or purports to exert an authority he does not specifically have or if the public official
[01:24:36.880 --> 01:24:43.840]  fails to perform a duty he is required to perform and in the process denies me the full of free access
[01:24:43.840 --> 01:24:50.160]  to or enjoyment of a right well that's a crime in the state of texas it's also a crime in the state
[01:24:50.160 --> 01:24:57.840]  of california and when that judge climbs in that when that federal judge climbs up on that bench
[01:24:57.840 --> 01:25:10.800]  he does not do so in the federal in the federal reserve there are generally only a few areas of
[01:25:10.800 --> 01:25:18.960]  property within a given state that actually belong to the federal government and these are areas that
[01:25:18.960 --> 01:25:27.120]  have been ceded to the federal government and let me qualify that the federal government can own
[01:25:27.120 --> 01:25:36.640]  property just like you or i can but if they simply own property hold the title to it then they hold it
[01:25:36.640 --> 01:25:43.920]  as a person under law as a legal fiction they hold it just like a corporation with whole property
[01:25:43.920 --> 01:25:50.000]  and they're subject to the laws of the state if a property has been ceded to the federal government
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:57.680]  by the state then the federal government has full jurisdiction and control over that property
[01:25:57.680 --> 01:26:04.000]  generally the only places they do that to are federal prisons so when the judge walks into
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:12.960]  the federal courthouse he does not walk into a federal enclave that federal courthouse belongs
[01:26:12.960 --> 01:26:19.920]  to the state and it's leased from the state so he is subject to the state's to this state law
[01:26:21.040 --> 01:26:24.400]  so if the judge pulls out a pistol and shoots somebody in the courtroom
[01:26:24.400 --> 01:26:31.600]  he is not prosecuted in the fed he's prosecuted in the state uh here in california remember
[01:26:31.600 --> 01:26:41.440]  years ago there was a movie called the presidio and it was about a federal installation a marine base
[01:26:41.440 --> 01:26:47.840]  and there was a murder on the marine base the feds did not investigate that murder the local
[01:26:47.840 --> 01:26:57.280]  sheriff investigated that murder the judge when he walks into that courtroom is subject to state
[01:26:57.280 --> 01:27:06.960]  penal laws does that sound interesting to read yes it does yeah and the rule is take the fed
[01:27:06.960 --> 01:27:17.040]  to the state and the state to the fed so what if the judge sitting on the bench failed to determine
[01:27:17.040 --> 01:27:20.800]  the law in accordance with the rules of evidence then apply the laws that comes to him to the facts
[01:27:20.800 --> 01:27:28.480]  in the case but rather ex exerted or purported to exert an authority did not expressly have
[01:27:29.600 --> 01:27:34.320]  and in the process denied you in the full and free access to or enjoyment all right well you
[01:27:34.320 --> 01:27:42.240]  could certainly appeal his decision to a court of appeals but that's a whole separate issue
[01:27:43.440 --> 01:27:49.360]  from the one where he denied you in the full and free access to or enjoyment or right in
[01:27:49.920 --> 01:27:56.960]  texas it would be in violation of 39.03 penal code i have looked it up in california but
[01:27:56.960 --> 01:28:04.720]  i don't have the statute memorized there is one in california i think in california it's called
[01:28:04.720 --> 01:28:15.280]  official misconduct and it is a class A misdemeanor and you file that with the state grand jury
[01:28:16.080 --> 01:28:22.240]  now when you try to do that in california the prosecuting attorney is going to want to run
[01:28:22.240 --> 01:28:33.920]  interference and block you and that's okay because at the end of the day everything is political
[01:28:34.880 --> 01:28:40.880]  the likelihood of your actually getting a federal judge and died it is very small
[01:28:42.080 --> 01:28:50.560]  you certainly can but everybody in the system when you go after a federal judge they're going to
[01:28:50.560 --> 01:28:56.800]  get real excited and they are not going to want to be in the middle of this so they're going to do
[01:28:56.800 --> 01:29:07.360]  everything they can to stop you and that's okay in fact it's a good thing you will never win your
[01:29:07.360 --> 01:29:15.920]  case simply because you have the law and the facts on your side to think so is naive it is not that
[01:29:15.920 --> 01:29:22.000]  way now never has been that way since we've had judges you will win your case if you have the
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:33.920]  politics on your side and all politics is local so you called me originally to speak about filing
[01:29:33.920 --> 01:29:42.160]  criminal charges against federal judges and that just makes me absolutely giddy because i see it
[01:29:42.160 --> 01:29:48.560]  is so politically powerful about to go to break and i'll explain a bit why when we come back on
[01:29:48.560 --> 01:29:55.120]  the other side and i'm saying this siree so that we don't hold unreasonable expectations i'll explain
[01:29:55.120 --> 01:30:05.120]  on the other side ready to jump over the radio we'll be right back every inbox is plagued by
[01:30:05.120 --> 01:30:10.800]  scam emails offering big bucks in exchange for a small upfront loan but why do these swindlers
[01:30:10.800 --> 01:30:15.520]  always tell you they're Nigerian i got your camp from albright and i'll have the answer in just a
[01:30:15.520 --> 01:30:21.920]  moment privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[01:30:21.920 --> 01:30:27.600]  and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so protect
[01:30:27.600 --> 01:30:34.080]  your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging
[01:30:34.080 --> 01:30:40.480]  on to this message is brought to you by start page dot com the private search engine alternative to google
[01:30:40.480 --> 01:30:49.440]  yahoo and bin start over with start page dear mrs del i work at the nigerian department of oil and i
[01:30:49.440 --> 01:30:54.480]  desperately need to transfer one hundred million dollars to the united states but i'm terminally ill
[01:30:54.480 --> 01:31:00.000]  and i can't do it alone if you'd email me your bank details and a small amount to cover the transfer
[01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:06.800]  i'd gladly offer you a 10 share incredibly online scams like this one are hugely successful
[01:31:06.800 --> 01:31:11.840]  but haven't you wondered why these crooks still identify themselves as nigerian despite that
[01:31:11.840 --> 01:31:18.160]  country's awful reputation for fraud answer by chasing away all but the most gullible scammers
[01:31:18.160 --> 01:31:22.800]  make sure they're dealing with people who are extra clueless and they milk that cluelessness
[01:31:22.800 --> 01:31:27.760]  all the way to the bank i've got your camp from albright for start page dot com the world's most
[01:31:27.760 --> 01:31:36.000]  private search engine this is building seven a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:41.600]  september 11 the government says that fire brought it down however 1500 architects and engineers
[01:31:41.600 --> 01:31:46.640]  concluded it was a controlled demolition over 6000 my fellow service members have given their lives
[01:31:46.640 --> 01:31:51.440]  of thousands of my fellow force responders of dying i'm not a conspiracy theorist i'm a structural
[01:31:51.440 --> 01:31:55.760]  engineer i'm a new york city correctional i'm an air force pilot i'm a father who lost his son
[01:31:55.760 --> 01:32:02.080]  we're americans and we deserve the truth go to remember building seven dot org today hey it's
[01:32:02.080 --> 01:32:06.000]  sanny here for hill country home improvements did your home receive hail or wind damage from the
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:10.480]  recent storms come on we all know that government caused it with their chem trails but good luck
[01:32:10.480 --> 01:32:14.800]  getting them to pay for it okay i might be kidding about the chem trails but i'm serious about your
[01:32:14.800 --> 01:32:19.440]  roof that's why you have insurance and hill country home improvements can handle the claim for you
[01:32:19.440 --> 01:32:24.960]  with little to no out of pocket expense and we accept bitcoin as a multi-year a plus member of the
[01:32:24.960 --> 01:32:29.840]  better business bureau with zero complaints you can trust hill country home improvements to handle
[01:32:29.840 --> 01:32:38.000]  your claim and your roof right the first time just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhome
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:42.400]  improvements dot com mention the crypto show and get a hundred dollars off and we'll donate another
[01:32:42.400 --> 01:32:47.440]  hundred dollars to the logos radio network to help continue this programming so if those out of town
[01:32:47.440 --> 01:32:56.560]  roofers come knocking your door should be locked in that's 512-992-8745 or hill country home improvements
[01:32:56.560 --> 01:33:19.680]  dot com discounts are based on full roof replacement mean i actually be kidding about chem trails looking for some truth you found it logos radio network dot com
[01:33:27.520 --> 01:33:37.920]  okay we are back randy jelton rule our radio and so read the reason i'm going through this
[01:33:39.360 --> 01:33:48.080]  if so that we you develop a way to go after them that will have the most effect you are dealing
[01:33:48.080 --> 01:33:56.800]  with corruption not necessarily vile and hateful corruption just generic ordinary
[01:33:57.840 --> 01:34:04.720]  run-of-the-mill corruption all these public officials try to protect each other it's not
[01:34:04.720 --> 01:34:11.200]  necessarily because they like each other because it's because they feel like we are the enemy
[01:34:11.200 --> 01:34:20.480]  and if i protect these other guys they'll protect me so what we have to do is figure out a way
[01:34:21.600 --> 01:34:29.520]  to make their positions untenable and over the years doing this show and dealing with public
[01:34:29.520 --> 01:34:38.240]  officials i've kind of developed a way to think about it that helps you to maneuver this system
[01:34:38.240 --> 01:34:46.160]  if you file a criminal complaint against these federal judges no one is going to want to take
[01:34:46.160 --> 01:34:56.960]  action on it and if you expect them to take action on it you will be frustrated and angered and feel
[01:34:56.960 --> 01:35:04.960]  betrayed and miserable and angry and lose your effectiveness there is a much better way of going
[01:35:04.960 --> 01:35:14.480]  about it and i have a certain set of a set of rules one of them is never ask a public official
[01:35:14.480 --> 01:35:22.160]  to do anything you actually want him to do and that's because you never ask a public official
[01:35:22.160 --> 01:35:30.480]  to do anything that the law does not specifically command them to do so in this case have a federal
[01:35:30.480 --> 01:35:35.200]  judge you have reason to believe and do believe that the federal judge violated the law relating
[01:35:35.200 --> 01:35:40.720]  to his office and the process denied you in a right so you make up a criminal complaint
[01:35:42.480 --> 01:35:49.520]  and you take it to local police department they're going to think that's a big joke
[01:35:50.800 --> 01:35:57.920]  now they're not going to go after a federal judge what do you think i'm crazy and you say oh my
[01:35:57.920 --> 01:36:04.640]  goodness sorry i bothered you bubba then you make up a criminal complaint against a police officer
[01:36:04.640 --> 01:36:11.440]  and you take it to the chief of police and you ask the chief of police to arrest the police officer
[01:36:12.240 --> 01:36:19.120]  for failing to perform a duty he is required to perform and in the process denying you in
[01:36:19.120 --> 01:36:23.520]  the full of free access to her enjoyment right and the chief of police is likely to throw you out of
[01:36:23.520 --> 01:36:29.520]  his office but when he does let it while he's throwing you out you'll be smiling all the way
[01:36:29.520 --> 01:36:38.880]  out the door because now you create a criminal complaint against the chief of police for not
[01:36:38.880 --> 01:36:45.680]  arresting the police officer for not arresting the federal judge and you take that to a local
[01:36:45.680 --> 01:36:52.800]  justice of the peace and he's going to throw you out of his office then you file a complaint against
[01:36:52.800 --> 01:37:01.680]  the justice of the peace now they're never going to tell you how much problem you caused them
[01:37:03.600 --> 01:37:12.880]  they do not want you to know but if you were a local ordinary every day flat police officer
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:18.960]  you get somebody come in and give you a complaint against a federal judge that terrifies you
[01:37:18.960 --> 01:37:24.560]  and you refuse to do it and then he goes and tries to get you arrested
[01:37:26.640 --> 01:37:33.680]  you're going to take that very serious you're pretty sure that everybody up the line will
[01:37:33.680 --> 01:37:42.800]  protect you but you never know this jump could cost me my career tomorrow he'd get me indicted
[01:37:42.800 --> 01:37:48.960]  and arrested this serious business then he goes to your boss you go to his boss and when
[01:37:48.960 --> 01:37:53.840]  his boss don't arrest him you try to get the boss arrested and the boss is not going to be a happy
[01:37:53.840 --> 01:38:02.720]  camper because he's getting a problem because of this officer and then when the jp justice of the
[01:38:02.720 --> 01:38:08.000]  peace refuses to take the complaint then you go to a county judge and he'll refuse to take it
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:14.400]  you go to the county judge with a criminal charge against the justice of the peace
[01:38:16.080 --> 01:38:23.680]  this escalates i call it my tar baby i've got this little tar baby and anybody who touches
[01:38:23.680 --> 01:38:29.600]  it sticks to it so i go to this police officer and say i got this little tar baby you want to
[01:38:29.600 --> 01:38:35.760]  touch it here go ahead touch it touch it and once he touches it by refusing to do what the law
[01:38:35.760 --> 01:38:41.040]  commands him to do that he sticks to it and then you go to the next one and get him to stick to it
[01:38:42.720 --> 01:38:48.720]  when the county judge doesn't act on it you go to the district judge and get him to refuse and
[01:38:48.720 --> 01:38:55.360]  they'll they will refuse what they'll do is they'll say oh mr forcery you really need to take this
[01:38:55.360 --> 01:39:01.120]  to the police department and you say oh thank you very much judge and you walk out of courtroom
[01:39:01.120 --> 01:39:06.080]  smiling because now you put his name on the criminal complaint you take it to the next one
[01:39:07.120 --> 01:39:15.600]  so let him refuse all they want to when you get to you go to the district judge and one thing
[01:39:15.600 --> 01:39:22.480]  when you start making criminal complaints that people tend to be afraid of you tend to be afraid
[01:39:22.480 --> 01:39:28.880]  that these guys have come after you and retaliate against you that's one of the reasons you never
[01:39:28.880 --> 01:39:39.840]  argue with them never give fair warning if you tell a public official this is what the law says
[01:39:39.840 --> 01:39:48.960]  you're supposed to do these are my rights blah blah blah the official is going to treat that as if
[01:39:48.960 --> 01:40:00.400]  you threaten them and call you agitated it's what they do so never give them fair warning bushwhack
[01:40:00.400 --> 01:40:07.680]  is much better when i when i when i go to a police officer and ask him to take my complaint
[01:40:09.040 --> 01:40:13.040]  i'm not really asking him i am directing him
[01:40:13.040 --> 01:40:24.480]  him our schools tell us what great rights we have but they try to install a response set
[01:40:24.480 --> 01:40:32.720]  in us that makes us fear public officials and they are very effective at it and i believe
[01:40:32.720 --> 01:40:37.920]  one of the reasons they may be so effective at it is that that is not what they intend to do
[01:40:37.920 --> 01:40:44.800]  it's just a result of how they treat us in school so we wind up being afraid of these
[01:40:44.800 --> 01:40:52.560]  officials and we have these expectations they'll do certain things and then when they don't we feel
[01:40:53.120 --> 01:41:00.560]  betrayed and frustrated and we wind up reacting angry and this anger and frustration comes out
[01:41:00.560 --> 01:41:10.880]  they treat it as agitation and then they can discredit us well using this tar baby syndrome
[01:41:10.880 --> 01:41:18.240]  we don't want them to do what we're asking them to do because we want to get to the top of the heap
[01:41:20.560 --> 01:41:30.080]  the one thing you must understand is citizen in this country we are the most powerful individuals
[01:41:30.080 --> 01:41:36.000]  that ever walk into a courtroom when i walk into a courthouse i am the baddest motor scooter in the
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:44.080]  building and there's only one reason that's because i'm nobody i'm not a judge i'm not a
[01:41:44.880 --> 01:41:54.080]  prosecutor a bailiff a clerk they're all public servants there are the servants i am the master
[01:41:54.080 --> 01:42:01.920]  when i walk into a courthouse i've got two hats one hat is a litigan's hat and i walk in wearing
[01:42:01.920 --> 01:42:09.600]  that litigan's hat but if one of my public officials steps outside of one of my legal lines
[01:42:09.600 --> 01:42:17.760]  i take off my mat my litigan's hat and i put on my master's hat the master of the servants
[01:42:17.760 --> 01:42:23.600]  and then i take legal action to bring that servant back in line
[01:42:26.240 --> 01:42:31.360]  and if you're the CEO of a company you see somebody in the mail room and he's goofing off
[01:42:31.360 --> 01:42:37.680]  not doing what he's supposed to you don't go in there and chew out that mailroom clerk
[01:42:38.320 --> 01:42:43.760]  you kind of manager for that and that manager has a a district manager and a district manager has a
[01:42:43.760 --> 01:42:49.280]  a vice president and the vice president has a president and the president answers to the CEO
[01:42:49.280 --> 01:42:54.320]  so the CEO the president and say what the heck is going on with this mail room down here can't
[01:42:54.320 --> 01:42:57.520]  you guys take care of your business and the president goes to the vice president the vice
[01:42:57.520 --> 01:43:02.800]  president to the district manager district manager to the to the local manager and everybody's in
[01:43:02.800 --> 01:43:13.120]  big trouble everything is political if we are to achieve remedy the way we do it is with a lot
[01:43:13.120 --> 01:43:19.760]  of politics and i know this is kind of long and you may want to listen to the archive the time or two
[01:43:20.480 --> 01:43:24.960]  but after you've been through this a time two or three times it begins to make sense
[01:43:25.920 --> 01:43:33.600]  on how we can affect very serious positive change because i'm leading up to going after
[01:43:33.600 --> 01:43:40.160]  him in the Fed but first we want to go after him in the state once we've been to the district judge
[01:43:40.160 --> 01:43:51.520]  much if you have had any concerns that these lower level functionaries will try to do something to
[01:43:51.520 --> 01:44:01.120]  retaliate against you that will all go away and this is how you make it go away nutritious spoon
[01:44:01.120 --> 01:44:07.280]  is real body armor it builds muscle burns fat improves digestion and feeds the entire body
[01:44:07.280 --> 01:44:11.840]  the nutrients it needs did you know the u.s. government banned the hemp plant from growing
[01:44:11.840 --> 01:44:16.720]  in the united states and classified it as a schedule one drug to hide it behind the marijuana
[01:44:16.720 --> 01:44:21.920]  plant people have been confused about this plant for over 80 years and many still don't know what
[01:44:21.920 --> 01:44:27.920]  hemp is so now you know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp they are different
[01:44:27.920 --> 01:44:33.840]  varieties of the same species hemp usa.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help
[01:44:33.840 --> 01:44:39.120]  people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about
[01:44:39.120 --> 01:44:46.720]  remember hemp protein powder contains 53% protein is gluten-free anti-inflammatory non-gmo and is
[01:44:46.720 --> 01:44:56.400]  loaded with nutrients call 888-910-4367 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for
[01:44:56.400 --> 01:45:05.760]  you only at hempusa.org are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without
[01:45:05.760 --> 01:45:12.160]  an attorney with juris dictionary the affordable easy to understand four cd course that will show
[01:45:12.160 --> 01:45:20.000]  you how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if you
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:25.920]  don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our step by step
[01:45:25.920 --> 01:45:32.800]  course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years
[01:45:32.800 --> 01:45:38.800]  of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should
[01:45:38.800 --> 01:45:44.720]  understand about the principles and practices that control our american courts you'll receive our
[01:45:44.720 --> 01:45:53.200]  audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases prosa tactics and much more please
[01:45:53.200 --> 01:46:00.800]  visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ
[01:46:00.800 --> 01:46:26.800]  okay we are back ready to tell some rule of law radio and we're talking about
[01:46:26.800 --> 01:46:34.000]  how to go after these guys in a way that's really effective if you're ever concerned that the police
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:41.840]  might retaliate against you once you filed a complaint against a district judge with the
[01:46:41.840 --> 01:46:47.040]  district attorney so you go to the district judge after the county and when he refuses to act then
[01:46:47.040 --> 01:46:52.240]  you go to the district attorney with criminal complaints against the district judge once you've
[01:46:52.240 --> 01:47:00.400]  done that you are absolutely protected i was standing outside my house one day i live right
[01:47:00.400 --> 01:47:05.680]  next to city hall i'm doing some plastic welding on the tank so i've got a little propane torch
[01:47:05.680 --> 01:47:11.840]  with an open flame and a new police officer he didn't know me came up and he said sir sir and i
[01:47:11.840 --> 01:47:17.280]  said yes he said we have a fire ban on you can't have that open flame i said sure i can't look nothing
[01:47:17.280 --> 01:47:24.720]  to it no no no you don't understand uh open flames have been banned i said oh that's okay i got all
[01:47:24.720 --> 01:47:29.600]  this equipment out here i have pressure equipment i got run the fire department i understand sir but
[01:47:29.600 --> 01:47:34.960]  you can't have that open flame wait a minute you're joking right oh no sir i'm not joking
[01:47:36.000 --> 01:47:43.840]  wait a minute that district judge john fostel sent you down here to harass me didn't he
[01:47:43.840 --> 01:47:49.760]  just because i filed one crummy little criminal complaint against him with the state attorney
[01:47:49.760 --> 01:47:56.800]  general accusing him of making a terroristic threat he sent you down here didn't he this police
[01:47:56.800 --> 01:48:03.760]  officer took a step back held up both hands with his palms out and said uh one moment mr kelton
[01:48:03.760 --> 01:48:09.120]  took out his cell phone dialed a number about 30 seconds the chief of police stepped out of city
[01:48:09.120 --> 01:48:16.400]  hall and looked across at me and said randy what are you doing to my new officer i said oh tom
[01:48:16.400 --> 01:48:25.760]  i was just jerking his chain and the cop said oh god i saw my whole career pass before my eyes
[01:48:27.440 --> 01:48:34.080]  these police and all these lower level officials are terrified of those judges the higher level
[01:48:34.080 --> 01:48:44.320]  the judge the more afraid of them they are and if you accuse this judge of doing something he didn't do
[01:48:45.840 --> 01:48:51.840]  like accusing him ascending that officer out to harass you he is going to go ballistic
[01:48:53.040 --> 01:48:58.320]  now he can't say a thing to you about it but he can hear a ream that policeman and that's
[01:48:58.320 --> 01:49:05.840]  what that policeman saw coming and it terrified him so once you start filing with higher level
[01:49:05.840 --> 01:49:14.720]  officials all these lower level officials duck their heads and run for cover you can do that siri
[01:49:14.720 --> 01:49:24.240]  because that the highest level public official in the state is your servant when i was in the
[01:49:24.240 --> 01:49:29.200]  military on a military base if a general was going to come to the base we had to mow everything and
[01:49:29.200 --> 01:49:35.280]  manicure they make the base look perfect everybody was terrified when the general showed up only one
[01:49:35.280 --> 01:49:43.280]  person on that base that frightened us more than the general and that was a civilian because the
[01:49:43.280 --> 01:49:50.160]  civilian could march into the general's office and crawl down his throat treat him like an
[01:49:50.160 --> 01:49:56.560]  errant stepchild and that general had no authority over him whatsoever all he could do was say yes sir
[01:49:56.560 --> 01:50:04.400]  yes sir and when that civilian got done with that general everybody's in trouble does that make sense
[01:50:04.400 --> 01:50:23.280]  siri is still there yes i'm here as a matter of fact i did similar approaches i they you know they
[01:50:23.280 --> 01:50:32.560]  they were sending this lower level police officers to my residents and they were doing traps of not
[01:50:32.560 --> 01:50:39.360]  direct threats but um you know tangential threat passing in front of my house shining light on
[01:50:39.360 --> 01:50:48.400]  my house middle of the night because i do a lot of my research at night and um so i um send a letter
[01:50:48.400 --> 01:50:55.680]  with certified mail to the sheriff as well as the fbi and attorney general and others and i said i
[01:50:55.680 --> 01:51:02.880]  know there's prima facie evidence that this charge is sending this mercenaries armed men with
[01:51:03.920 --> 01:51:10.960]  military weapons trying to intimidate demonize harris unstock me and i want you to stop it
[01:51:11.920 --> 01:51:20.000]  and then it stopped yes good you understand that okay then you for you understand what i'm talking
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:27.600]  about and i kind of figured you did but this show is about teaching these techniques that's how you
[01:51:27.600 --> 01:51:34.560]  do it in the state now let's talk about how you do it in the fed the last time we spoke i asked you
[01:51:34.560 --> 01:51:45.600]  to write down 28 usc 535 did you get that and read it yes i did did you do you see the implication
[01:51:45.600 --> 01:51:59.280]  yes okay for for those who don't let me explain this 28 uscode 535 reads like a whistleblower
[01:51:59.280 --> 01:52:05.760]  statute if a public official if a federal employee has knowledge that another federal
[01:52:05.760 --> 01:52:12.560]  employee has violated a law they don't go to their to their boss or to their boss's boss
[01:52:12.560 --> 01:52:21.280]  they are required to give notice to the attorney general in washington dc so this bypasses
[01:52:21.280 --> 01:52:26.880]  all the people who could retaliate against them takes it straight to the top takes it completely
[01:52:26.880 --> 01:52:36.320]  out of their hands what's a great law so it gives us tremendous opportunity i recently
[01:52:36.320 --> 01:52:43.920]  filed criminal charges against my local federal judge john mcbride and yes i'm i'm more than
[01:52:43.920 --> 01:52:50.160]  pleased to use his name on the air and if if he feels put upon or or disparaged i would
[01:52:50.160 --> 01:52:56.080]  very much appreciate giving him an opportunity to come on the air and explain to the public
[01:52:56.640 --> 01:53:02.800]  why he dismissed a complaint with prejudice when he lacked subject matter jurisdiction
[01:53:02.800 --> 01:53:10.240]  or i would love that but somehow i don't think i can get him on anyway i filed a criminal charge
[01:53:10.240 --> 01:53:19.520]  against him of official oppression violation 18 uscode 242 i filed it with the special agent
[01:53:19.520 --> 01:53:29.280]  in charge in dallas texas sent it by certified mail i got a call from an intake person and
[01:53:29.280 --> 01:53:34.080]  they ultimately asked me what i wanted them to do with this complaint and i told them i want
[01:53:34.080 --> 01:53:39.600]  you to do exactly what the law commands you to do now i'm sure you don't know what that is and
[01:53:39.600 --> 01:53:48.160]  i'm not going to tell you well they didn't know what it was 28 uscode 535 commanded that special
[01:53:48.160 --> 01:53:56.480]  agent in charge to give notice to the attorney general of this complaint against this federal
[01:53:56.480 --> 01:54:04.800]  judge well i waited a couple of weeks and i sent a freedom of information request to the attorney
[01:54:04.800 --> 01:54:12.320]  general in washington dc and i asked to see a copy of the notice that the attorney general
[01:54:12.320 --> 01:54:18.400]  received from this special agent in charge concerning my criminal accusation against the
[01:54:18.400 --> 01:54:32.560]  federal judge and what do you think i got back nothing oh goodness i was devastated so now
[01:54:32.560 --> 01:54:39.680]  i'm preparing criminal charges against the attorney general under freedom of information act
[01:54:39.680 --> 01:54:47.600]  and i will be filing criminal charges against the attorney general and against the special
[01:54:47.600 --> 01:54:57.200]  agent in charge with the local us attorney and sered what do you think he's going to do with
[01:54:57.200 --> 01:55:06.880]  my criminal complaints nothing and nothing so they don't send another letter to the attorney general
[01:55:06.880 --> 01:55:14.400]  asking to see the notice that the u.s. attorney sent to the attorney general under 28 uscode 535
[01:55:17.120 --> 01:55:28.080]  us attorney it is his duty to investigate these so but i can't find anything in 28 uscode 535
[01:55:28.080 --> 01:55:39.200]  uscode 535 that exempts a fbi agent or a u.s. attorney from the requirement to give this notice
[01:55:41.360 --> 01:55:52.000]  and if we go to 18 uscode 232 i'm sorry 18 uscode 242 the kook looks clan act it essentially says
[01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:56.240]  that if a public official fails to form a duty he's required to perform in the process to nice
[01:55:56.240 --> 01:56:00.240]  meeting the pool and free access to her enjoyment right well that's a crime it's class a misdemeanor
[01:56:01.680 --> 01:56:06.320]  so the us attorney was required to give notice to the attorney general
[01:56:07.920 --> 01:56:11.680]  in order to facilitate the adjudication of this crime and he didn't do it
[01:56:13.200 --> 01:56:19.760]  they denied me in procedural due process so i filed against so when the i don't get a letter
[01:56:19.760 --> 01:56:28.800]  back from the us attorney now i make up a criminal complaint against i'm sorry us attorney general
[01:56:28.800 --> 01:56:35.760]  when i don't get a response from the attorney general on the complaint from the us attorney i
[01:56:35.760 --> 01:56:43.440]  assume the us attorney didn't send him one so i prepare a criminal complaint against the us attorney
[01:56:43.440 --> 01:56:49.920]  the attorney another complaint against the attorney general a complaint against the special
[01:56:49.920 --> 01:56:55.840]  agent in charge a complaint against the federal judge and i send them all to the us grand jury
[01:56:56.640 --> 01:57:04.160]  at the us attorney's address that's the only address we have for grand juries i send it registered
[01:57:04.160 --> 01:57:14.400]  restricted and under postal code only the person named can sign for it and i send it to the
[01:57:14.400 --> 01:57:21.600]  form into the grand jury well the minimum wage guy in the mail room is going to sign for this
[01:57:21.600 --> 01:57:26.400]  he's going to send it with the stack of everything else up to the us attorney us attorney's going
[01:57:26.400 --> 01:57:34.880]  to open it and he's going to be looking at criminal complaints against himself addressed to a federal
[01:57:34.880 --> 01:57:45.120]  grand jury well that's going to jerk a knot in his shorts okay here's why we do this at this
[01:57:45.120 --> 01:57:54.080]  particular point in time in history we have a new president and whatever else you may think of
[01:57:54.080 --> 01:58:03.360]  trump he is a wild card he ran as a republican but he's really not a republican he's not a
[01:58:03.360 --> 01:58:08.960]  democrat i've been saying for years it makes no difference the democrats and the republicans
[01:58:08.960 --> 01:58:15.600]  all have their snouts in the same trough whatever else trump may be he don't have his
[01:58:15.600 --> 01:58:25.680]  snout neither one of those troughs he's an unknown a wild card but whenever a new president takes
[01:58:25.680 --> 01:58:33.120]  office every us attorney in the country must tender his resignation this is why we do this and i'll
[01:58:33.120 --> 01:58:39.840]  explain on the other side why it is potentially so powerful randy kelton for rule of law radio
[01:58:39.840 --> 01:58:55.840]  bag the bible remains the most popular book in the world yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.840 --> 01:59:01.760]  because they struggle to understand it some new translations try to help by simplifying the text
[01:59:01.760 --> 01:59:08.640]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture enter the recovery version
[01:59:08.640 --> 01:59:15.200]  first this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate but the real story is the more than
[01:59:15.200 --> 01:59:21.840]  9 000 explanatory footnotes difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way
[01:59:22.400 --> 01:59:27.360]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:32.720]  bibles for america would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking
[01:59:32.720 --> 01:59:42.080]  me this comprehensive yet compact study bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1 888 551
[01:59:42.080 --> 01:59:50.000]  0102 or by ordering online at free study bible dot com that's free study bible dot com
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:02.800]  you are listening to the logos radio network logos radio network dot com