ROL_2017-03-23_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.640]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:05.640 --> 00:12.440]  Markets for Wednesday, the 22nd of March, 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,249.63
[00:12.440 --> 00:20.680]  an ounce, silver $17.56 an ounce, Texas Crude $47.34 a barrel, and Bitcoin is just over
[00:20.680 --> 00:33.640]  a thousand, sitting at $1,019 U.S. currency. Today in history, the year 1784, the Emerald
[00:33.640 --> 00:38.080]  Buddha, considered the Palladium of the Kingdom of Thailand, is moved with a great ceremony
[00:38.080 --> 00:47.880]  to its current location in Wat Phra Ka'u, Thailand. Today in history, he had recent
[00:47.880 --> 00:52.440]  news. A John Reveal, a 29-year-old Marine veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan is being
[00:52.440 --> 00:56.720]  charged with one count of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, along with a hate crime,
[00:56.720 --> 01:00.880]  for sending a tweet to Dallas-based journalist, senior writer and newsweek and contributing
[01:00.880 --> 01:05.920]  editor of Vanity Fair, Kurt Etchenwald, which led him to having a seizure. John Reveal was
[01:05.920 --> 01:10.760]  arrested as Maryland home on a federal cyber stalking charge. Etchenwald described that
[01:10.760 --> 01:15.840]  on the 15th of December, someone tweeted a flashing animated image of him that had induced
[01:15.840 --> 01:20.280]  him into an 8-minute epileptic seizure, which included the message, you deserve a seizure
[01:20.280 --> 01:24.560]  for your post. After the police were called and notified by Etchenwald's wife, Dallas
[01:24.560 --> 01:29.240]  police served Twitter with a search warrant for the user account at Jude Goldstein. Some
[01:29.240 --> 01:32.720]  of the messages recovered from the account concerning Etchenwald stated that I know he
[01:32.720 --> 01:37.520]  has epilepsy. I hope this sends him into a seizure, and let's see if he dies. In charging
[01:37.520 --> 01:41.560]  Reveal with cyber stalking, the FBI concluded that the tweet had been sent with the intent
[01:41.560 --> 01:46.040]  to kill, injure, harass and intimidate, and today, Monday, a Dallas County grand jury
[01:46.040 --> 01:50.920]  indicted Reveal stating that he knew Etchenwald was susceptible to epileptic seizures and
[01:50.920 --> 01:56.120]  used them as a deadly weapon, that is, the animated images in the tweet to assault him.
[01:56.120 --> 01:59.960]  The hate crime was added to the charge due to Reveal's bias or prejudice against persons
[01:59.960 --> 02:06.680]  of Jewish faith or dissent.
[02:06.680 --> 02:10.520]  Published this week in Nature Plants, MIT and their collaborators have designed a microfluidic
[02:10.520 --> 02:16.200]  device they call Triana Chip. The simple setup, which mimics the osmosis and trees, allows
[02:16.200 --> 02:21.240]  a chip to passively pump water from the tank through the chip into a beaker at a constant
[02:21.240 --> 02:25.880]  flow rate for several days, as opposed to the previous designs which only pumped for
[02:25.880 --> 02:30.920]  several minutes. Anit Khosoi, professor and associate department head for operations
[02:30.920 --> 02:35.920]  in the MIT's Department of Mechanical Engineering, envisions that the Triana Chip pump may be
[02:35.920 --> 02:40.920]  built into small robots for production of hydraulic power without requiring active pumps
[02:40.920 --> 03:08.920]  or parts.
[03:08.920 --> 03:27.500]  Boy, what did you get, buddy?
[03:27.500 --> 03:37.180]  Bad boys whatcha gonna do whatcha gonna do when they come for you
[03:37.180 --> 03:43.020]  Bad boys whatcha gonna do whatcha gonna do when they come for you
[03:43.020 --> 03:51.300]  when you work and your head bad treats you go to school and learn the golden rules
[03:51.300 --> 04:03.500]  Okay, howdy, howdy, this is Randy Carlton, Debra Stephens, Rule Law Radio on this Thursday,
[04:03.500 --> 04:07.540]  the 23rd day of March 2017.
[04:07.540 --> 04:12.180]  We're almost a quarter of the way through the year already.
[04:12.180 --> 04:14.900]  It's hard to believe it's moving this quickly.
[04:14.900 --> 04:17.340]  We're just having way too much fun.
[04:17.340 --> 04:19.820]  We have the phone lines open.
[04:19.820 --> 04:24.660]  Our call line, call number is 512-646-1984.
[04:24.660 --> 04:33.340]  We have our fundraiser going and we've got two guns we're giving away and some accessories
[04:33.340 --> 04:35.860]  for AR-15.
[04:35.860 --> 04:40.460]  Go to Logos Radio Network and have a look at the gun giveaway.
[04:40.460 --> 04:50.540]  Now I have my e-book out there and I'll readily admit it needs some editing but I press to
[04:50.540 --> 04:51.540]  get it all in.
[04:51.540 --> 05:01.820]  There's a lot of stuff in there and this e-book complements Dr. Graves' jurisdictionary.
[05:01.820 --> 05:09.260]  Lawyers go to school and spend $150,000 to $180,000 to get a law degree.
[05:09.260 --> 05:13.060]  But they don't learn how to actually practice law.
[05:13.060 --> 05:19.020]  They learn how to argue, how to craft and present legal arguments.
[05:19.020 --> 05:21.780]  But they don't learn how to practice law.
[05:21.780 --> 05:30.100]  Dr. Graves' jurisdictionary will show you how to practice law, how to craft motions,
[05:30.100 --> 05:33.300]  what kind of motions are out there for the most part.
[05:33.300 --> 05:36.260]  Actually, you can make a motion for anything.
[05:36.260 --> 05:42.100]  But you prefer to make motions in the way that judges are accustomed to seeing them and
[05:42.100 --> 05:47.900]  jurisdictionary will show you how to do that at an incredibly inexpensive amount, half
[05:47.900 --> 05:51.780]  of what it would cost to take it.
[05:51.780 --> 05:56.180]  So if you beat one ticket, you've more than paid yourself back.
[05:56.180 --> 06:04.300]  My e-book is $100 and if you get that one, then you get four chances toward the gun giveaway.
[06:04.300 --> 06:10.860]  And then the e-book, I sort of pick up where Dr. Graves left off.
[06:10.860 --> 06:18.500]  And I talk about things that Dr. Graves wouldn't really talk about because he's a board-certified
[06:18.500 --> 06:20.820]  attorney.
[06:20.820 --> 06:25.300]  He functions from inside the system.
[06:25.300 --> 06:32.660]  I function from outside the system and I see the system from a different perspective.
[06:32.660 --> 06:40.740]  And I've tried to present a way to think about how law works that will help you find
[06:40.740 --> 06:42.700]  remedy.
[06:42.700 --> 06:49.180]  And so far, most people who have looked at the e-book have found it of value.
[06:49.180 --> 06:54.340]  And I will be relatively soon adding more to it.
[06:54.340 --> 06:57.220]  I have more functionality.
[06:57.220 --> 07:04.180]  With what I'm planning on adding to it, we're going to change the way we do the e-book.
[07:04.180 --> 07:15.380]  Instead of sending out a PDF, what I'm going to do is set up a website for the e-book.
[07:15.380 --> 07:18.700]  And the book is a lot more than I'm adding to it.
[07:18.700 --> 07:23.380]  I'm real close to producing this questionnaire.
[07:23.380 --> 07:29.620]  Debra and I first started the radio soon after we started.
[07:29.620 --> 07:30.620]  We came up with this idea.
[07:30.620 --> 07:35.380]  Debra and I came up with this idea of this questionnaire.
[07:35.380 --> 07:38.740]  And I've been working on it ever since.
[07:38.740 --> 07:42.820]  This is about seven or eight years now.
[07:42.820 --> 07:53.340]  And just recently, I've made some major steps forward that will allow me to create questions
[07:53.340 --> 08:02.460]  and errors that from the user's end, they look relatively simple.
[08:02.460 --> 08:06.980]  And in fact, they are simple.
[08:06.980 --> 08:15.860]  The questionnaires themselves are huge and complex, but I've worked out a recursive tool
[08:15.860 --> 08:22.100]  that the big problem with this questionnaire is it's so big.
[08:22.100 --> 08:29.980]  And I loaded it up on my wife's brand new notebook, the laptop computer.
[08:29.980 --> 08:35.540]  I loaded the program, the basic program that holds it, and then opened the file.
[08:35.540 --> 08:38.620]  It took 30 minutes to open the file.
[08:38.620 --> 08:45.100]  And once the file was open, the computer could not move with it.
[08:45.100 --> 08:54.220]  I have an 8-core 4-gig processor system on my desk that struggles with this thing.
[08:54.220 --> 08:57.580]  And for a long time, this has been a major problem.
[08:57.580 --> 09:04.900]  Well I worked out a recursive technique that has made this thing blistering fast.
[09:04.900 --> 09:09.740]  So we fixed the size problem.
[09:09.740 --> 09:16.900]  And now what I'm doing, the reason I'm going to put this on a website is we'll have you
[09:16.900 --> 09:22.260]  register because I need certain information.
[09:22.260 --> 09:30.740]  The biggest problem I have creating documents for people are those crummy, annoying little
[09:30.740 --> 09:31.740]  details.
[09:31.740 --> 09:36.740]  Did you correct the name in the certificate of service?
[09:36.740 --> 09:39.900]  Did you put the right address in the certificate of service?
[09:39.900 --> 09:42.300]  Did you get the right plaintiffs in there?
[09:42.300 --> 09:47.220]  Did you get all the right addresses and zip codes?
[09:47.220 --> 09:50.500]  This has always been the biggest pain in the neck.
[09:50.500 --> 09:55.020]  And anybody who's written legal documents will understand this problem.
[09:55.020 --> 09:59.860]  You get into your legal issue and you get focused on it.
[09:59.860 --> 10:02.940]  You work that all out.
[10:02.940 --> 10:09.180]  And all these annoying, fine details, your head is just not there and you wind up missing
[10:09.180 --> 10:10.180]  them.
[10:10.180 --> 10:11.180]  I filed it.
[10:11.180 --> 10:14.820]  I gave a friend of mine a challenge subject matter jurisdiction and he filed it.
[10:14.820 --> 10:16.340]  And it had my name in it.
[10:16.340 --> 10:17.340]  It had somebody else.
[10:17.340 --> 10:22.300]  It had about four people's names in it, different places.
[10:22.300 --> 10:26.980]  Where we didn't go through it real careful and make sure we changed out all the details.
[10:26.980 --> 10:31.500]  That was incredibly embarrassing and annoying.
[10:31.500 --> 10:35.180]  So I'll build an input sheet.
[10:35.180 --> 10:42.100]  The one I'm going to start with is a document that we've had really good luck with so far.
[10:42.100 --> 10:46.700]  All this stuff about right to travel and traffic.
[10:46.700 --> 10:51.100]  I'm not taking on right to travel.
[10:51.100 --> 10:57.700]  When a police officer writes a citation, right to travel is an affirmative defense.
[10:57.700 --> 11:00.100]  We don't want to get to any affirmative defense.
[11:00.100 --> 11:03.260]  We want to go back and start at the beginning.
[11:03.260 --> 11:07.620]  The first step is who the heck are you?
[11:07.620 --> 11:14.060]  And what authority do you have to interfere with my freedom of movement?
[11:14.060 --> 11:21.540]  So I have this challenge to subject matter jurisdiction that walks down the requirements
[11:21.540 --> 11:31.700]  in the transportation code to for a jurisdiction to enforce the Texas Transportation Code.
[11:31.700 --> 11:37.300]  If you read those things, they are absolutely insane.
[11:37.300 --> 11:48.620]  90% of the jurisdictions around the state cannot enforce the transportation code, period.
[11:48.620 --> 11:56.380]  And then when they can, five people in the county can enforce the transportation code.
[11:56.380 --> 12:00.460]  Four of them sheriff's deputies, one municipal officer.
[12:00.460 --> 12:04.460]  Now does that sound insane?
[12:04.460 --> 12:06.180]  That's what the code says.
[12:06.180 --> 12:14.580]  It says the sheriff can appoint four officers, five officers, one of which can be a municipal
[12:14.580 --> 12:15.580]  officer.
[12:15.580 --> 12:18.420]  That's exactly where it says.
[12:18.420 --> 12:22.540]  If you read it, when I say it on the air like this, you're thinking, this guy had to make
[12:22.540 --> 12:23.540]  this stuff up.
[12:23.540 --> 12:25.540]  This is too insane.
[12:25.540 --> 12:27.900]  It really is insane.
[12:27.900 --> 12:32.300]  The jurisdictions that can enforce, I've read this on the air before.
[12:32.300 --> 12:34.300]  It's absolutely insane.
[12:34.300 --> 12:46.540]  It is clear that the legislature carved out little places in the state that could enforce
[12:46.540 --> 12:56.940]  the county of over three million bordering a Mexican state or bordering a U.S. port.
[12:56.940 --> 13:07.100]  A city of over under 8,500 that is the county seat of a county and has a national defense
[13:07.100 --> 13:09.660]  highway running through the county.
[13:09.660 --> 13:14.460]  I live in Wise County, Texas.
[13:14.460 --> 13:22.940]  And there's not a jurisdiction in the county that can enforce transportation code, period,
[13:22.940 --> 13:23.940]  by these standards.
[13:23.940 --> 13:29.220]  So, we start out by saying who can enforce it.
[13:29.220 --> 13:36.460]  What I need is, I need the person's name, I need the information on the ticket.
[13:36.460 --> 13:44.220]  So we're putting in a form where you register and sign into the site.
[13:44.220 --> 13:49.740]  And we need you to register and sign in so only people who are registered can get in
[13:49.740 --> 13:53.620]  and we can protect the information a lot better.
[13:53.620 --> 13:54.620]  Okay.
[13:54.620 --> 14:00.220]  Then you get a ticket, you put in the information off the ticket, the jurisdiction, the jurisdiction's
[14:00.220 --> 14:09.060]  address, the officer who wrote the citation, the exact verbiage of the charge because that's
[14:09.060 --> 14:11.060]  always junk.
[14:11.060 --> 14:15.140]  I got one speeding, okay.
[14:15.140 --> 14:17.740]  What does that mean?
[14:17.740 --> 14:21.660]  Does that mean he was driving faster than you'd like?
[14:21.660 --> 14:27.140]  Or does that mean he was driving in excess of the posted speed limit when there were
[14:27.140 --> 14:33.940]  extenuating circumstances that caused that excess speed to be to create a hazard?
[14:33.940 --> 14:36.980]  That's what the code calls for.
[14:36.980 --> 14:41.900]  It's not enough to accuse you of exceeding the speed limit.
[14:41.900 --> 14:46.980]  They also have to show that in exceeding the speed limit, you create a hazard.
[14:46.980 --> 14:52.420]  So, we start out by asking who are you?
[14:52.420 --> 14:54.980]  We want to know who the police officer is.
[14:54.980 --> 14:59.100]  We want to see his authorization under the separate codes.
[14:59.100 --> 15:00.700]  So we create this document.
[15:00.700 --> 15:07.580]  The document is always the same because the elements are always the same.
[15:07.580 --> 15:11.420]  The elements of jurisdiction don't change.
[15:11.420 --> 15:15.420]  So it's relatively simple to create a generic document.
[15:15.420 --> 15:20.900]  You just feed in your data and it starts spitting you out documents and you start firing over
[15:20.900 --> 15:21.900]  the court.
[15:21.900 --> 15:26.940]  Traffic is the first one I want to bring up and get people to use it because I want to
[15:26.940 --> 15:33.540]  see what problems you have that when we create the documents we didn't anticipate.
[15:33.540 --> 15:40.660]  And I hope within the next couple of weeks to have a rudimentary site up and a set of
[15:40.660 --> 15:44.980]  I've got three primary documents that I want to get in there first.
[15:44.980 --> 15:50.820]  So you can just go ahead and fill out the input document and this thing will start spitting
[15:50.820 --> 15:51.820]  you out documents.
[15:51.820 --> 15:54.620]  So anyway, that's what we're working on.
[15:54.620 --> 15:58.900]  Holy mackerel, my call board is jammed.
[15:58.900 --> 16:02.260]  So we're going to go to calls here shortly.
[16:02.260 --> 16:08.900]  Make sure that over this next break go to the Logos Radio Network and order the e-books
[16:08.900 --> 16:11.780]  so you'll be up to speed.
[16:11.780 --> 16:19.900]  We talk about how to think about the courts when you deal with them.
[16:19.900 --> 16:25.380]  And a lot of what's constructed in there is constructed for the purpose of giving you
[16:25.380 --> 16:32.100]  a way to hold your mind that will keep the jurisdictions from being able to screw with
[16:32.100 --> 16:33.100]  you.
[16:33.100 --> 16:36.260]  And it will allow you to absolutely make them crazy.
[16:36.260 --> 16:44.700]  This is Reddick Health, Denver, Stevens, Rueva Radio, I call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:44.700 --> 16:48.380]  Our call board will only hold about four or five people so if you try to get in and you
[16:48.380 --> 16:55.220]  can't get through, wait till I finish with a caller and then try to call in and then
[16:55.220 --> 16:56.900]  we can take another one.
[16:56.900 --> 16:58.900]  We'll be right back.
[16:58.900 --> 17:00.900]  Dang, cookies.
[17:00.900 --> 17:01.900]  Cookie?
[17:01.900 --> 17:02.900]  Me love cookies.
[17:02.900 --> 17:03.900]  Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers.
[17:03.900 --> 17:04.900]  No, these are yucky cookies.
[17:04.900 --> 17:05.900]  Cookies?
[17:05.900 --> 17:06.900]  Yucky?
[17:06.900 --> 17:07.900]  No.
[17:07.900 --> 17:08.900]  No, bad cookies.
[17:08.900 --> 17:09.900]  You can't even eat these cookies.
[17:09.900 --> 17:10.900]  These are cyber cookies.
[17:10.900 --> 17:11.900]  No, can't eat.
[17:11.900 --> 17:16.900]  No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:16.900 --> 17:17.900]  Me have apples.
[17:17.900 --> 17:18.900]  Really?
[17:18.900 --> 17:21.420]  Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:21.420 --> 17:22.420]  Yummy apple.
[17:22.420 --> 17:26.820]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:26.820 --> 17:32.980]  I click control, shift, delete and then scroll down to cookie and clear them.
[17:32.980 --> 17:34.540]  Bye bye yucky cookies.
[17:34.540 --> 17:40.220]  Now I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand
[17:40.220 --> 17:46.220]  side, bookmark the link and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy
[17:46.220 --> 17:47.220]  new cookie.
[17:47.220 --> 17:48.940]  New cookies for me.
[17:48.940 --> 17:53.660]  Consider it an early Christmas present and every time I order on Amazon, I go through
[17:53.660 --> 17:57.380]  this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[17:57.380 --> 17:58.380]  These are cookies.
[17:58.380 --> 18:00.580]  These are classified.
[18:00.580 --> 18:05.900]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.900 --> 18:09.380]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[18:09.380 --> 18:13.700]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.700 --> 18:14.700]  can win too.
[18:14.700 --> 18:19.500]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.500 --> 18:25.300]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.300 --> 18:29.900]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:29.900 --> 18:34.100]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.100 --> 18:39.220]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.220 --> 18:41.380]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.380 --> 18:46.940]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner
[18:46.940 --> 18:49.900]  or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.900 --> 18:59.460]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.460 --> 19:00.460]  next.
[19:00.460 --> 19:29.620]  If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio-network.com, logosradio-network.com.
[19:29.620 --> 19:30.620]  Okay.
[19:30.620 --> 19:31.620]  We are back.
[19:31.620 --> 19:36.620]  Randy Calton, Deborah Stevens at Rule of Law Radio and we're going to go to Dave in Texas.
[19:36.620 --> 19:37.620]  Hello, Dave.
[19:37.620 --> 19:38.620]  Hello, Randy.
[19:38.620 --> 19:43.620]  What do you have for us today?
[19:43.620 --> 19:58.820]  Randy, I have an eviction in county court and I have a court-appointed lawyer and he's
[19:58.820 --> 20:10.580]  informed me that the other side wants to have this eviction trial on the 17th or the 24th
[20:10.580 --> 20:13.580]  of April.
[20:13.580 --> 20:24.900]  Now, since I have, I'm the one who peeled this from JP Court to county court and I just
[20:24.900 --> 20:34.900]  got off the fall with county court so I can actually create my own date sometime in May.
[20:34.900 --> 20:40.700]  Is that right?
[20:40.700 --> 20:44.660]  That you can set, well, you can try to set a date later.
[20:44.660 --> 20:50.820]  The court actually has the last say, but this is not criminal, this is civil.
[20:50.820 --> 20:55.380]  So in civil, they expect both parties to be civil.
[20:55.380 --> 21:02.300]  And before any party sets a date, they have a requirement to contact the other party to
[21:02.300 --> 21:07.580]  determine if this date is suitable for that party.
[21:07.580 --> 21:15.660]  And there's a good chance that you already have plans to give your catabath on that day
[21:15.660 --> 21:22.420]  so that day's not good for you because they didn't contact you and see if your day was
[21:22.420 --> 21:23.420]  open.
[21:23.420 --> 21:31.820]  So the way this is generally done is you go to the court coordinator and ask the court
[21:31.820 --> 21:40.500]  coordinator what days will the judge be hearing this kind of case and get a set of dates,
[21:40.500 --> 21:44.260]  at least to maybe three or four.
[21:44.260 --> 21:53.220]  And then pick a couple of those dates and as far down the road as you want to.
[21:53.220 --> 21:59.940]  And send either a letter or email to the opposing counsel and ask him which of these two dates
[21:59.940 --> 22:02.780]  would be better for you.
[22:02.780 --> 22:07.420]  And he will either pick one or offer a date of his own.
[22:07.420 --> 22:12.580]  And before a date is set, the courts want the two parties to make sure they can both
[22:12.580 --> 22:16.100]  be there.
[22:16.100 --> 22:20.180]  If they didn't do that, then you forced them to do that.
[22:20.180 --> 22:21.180]  Yeah.
[22:21.180 --> 22:22.180]  Yeah.
[22:22.180 --> 22:33.780]  I would like to pick a later date to give myself more time, but this has already been
[22:33.780 --> 22:39.580]  going on since September so they can actually push the date on me.
[22:39.580 --> 22:48.860]  Yes, they can, but they normally don't and if the opposing counsel sets the date with
[22:48.860 --> 22:52.340]  the outcomes, oh wait a minute, you have counsel.
[22:52.340 --> 23:00.140]  So you have to do this with your counsel and if you have court appointed counsel, then
[23:00.140 --> 23:02.140]  you can beat up court appointed counsel.
[23:02.140 --> 23:05.180]  He's stuck with you.
[23:05.180 --> 23:09.980]  But has court appointed counsel done in your favor?
[23:09.980 --> 23:22.780]  Well, he's given them some pleadings to just try to allow me some more time.
[23:22.780 --> 23:31.980]  He's basically given them a bunch of baloney just to allow more time for me.
[23:31.980 --> 23:46.940]  He is kind of pressuring me to choose a date and I do want to be somewhat reasonable.
[23:46.940 --> 23:53.660]  They want to get me in in late April and I'm just going to try for maybe late June.
[23:53.660 --> 24:00.940]  Yeah, then maybe negotiate back to middle of May or something, or late May.
[24:00.940 --> 24:30.860]  All right, Randy, I'd like to just move back to my JP case which I lost last week.
[24:30.860 --> 24:41.100]  The basis of the jury's decision was based on the lease.
[24:41.100 --> 24:54.540]  Is there any way I could argue that these people went beyond the lease and they're
[24:54.540 --> 24:56.540]  abused of me?
[24:56.540 --> 24:58.820]  Well, of course you can.
[24:58.820 --> 25:04.860]  We've talked about this on the air and that original trial, it's like it never happened.
[25:04.860 --> 25:07.860]  You get a do-over.
[25:07.860 --> 25:08.860]  That's right.
[25:08.860 --> 25:10.020]  Now you know what they're going to say.
[25:10.020 --> 25:16.180]  You know what they're going to do, so you need to craft an argument to address that.
[25:16.180 --> 25:22.380]  I suggest that you do your homework, prepare the documents, give them to your lawyer and
[25:22.380 --> 25:30.460]  tell him these are the issues, address these issues when he bulks, bargain with him immediately.
[25:30.460 --> 25:33.900]  Then he's going to have a fit.
[25:33.900 --> 25:35.700]  I'm sorry, Bubba.
[25:35.700 --> 25:36.700]  Okay.
[25:36.700 --> 25:39.340]  You don't want to do your job?
[25:39.340 --> 25:45.260]  Then this is what you get, or at least let him know you intend to.
[25:45.260 --> 25:48.620]  That's what I did to mine.
[25:48.620 --> 25:58.540]  I told him I have motions before the court and I have 19 issues before the court.
[25:58.540 --> 26:02.500]  You will adequately adjudicate every single one of those.
[26:02.500 --> 26:06.380]  You failed to adequately adjudicate a single one, I'll bargain with you.
[26:06.380 --> 26:10.980]  Holy mackerel, that really got his attention.
[26:10.980 --> 26:15.740]  The court dismissed the case to protect my lawyer from me.
[26:15.740 --> 26:23.180]  If he knows you're going to sting him, he gets to go to the court and say, hey, you
[26:23.180 --> 26:26.100]  guys appointed me this scoundrel.
[26:26.100 --> 26:27.580]  He's going to ruin my career.
[26:27.580 --> 26:30.580]  You got to do something to help me out.
[26:30.580 --> 26:35.180]  It's all politics in the end.
[26:35.180 --> 26:38.700]  It's like your first case never had happened.
[26:38.700 --> 26:40.740]  You get to start over.
[26:40.740 --> 26:56.460]  Yes, so with the new case, do how or can I argue that the lease is... I mean, I compared
[26:56.460 --> 27:09.140]  this lease to the entire Texas Court of Residency and the lease seems to be illegal.
[27:09.140 --> 27:14.380]  Can I... but I signed it, so...
[27:14.380 --> 27:15.380]  Okay, hold on.
[27:15.380 --> 27:16.380]  Hold on.
[27:16.380 --> 27:22.060]  I'm hearing something that makes me uncomfortable.
[27:22.060 --> 27:31.020]  I hear that you believe that the disposition of this case is somehow some kind of final
[27:31.020 --> 27:32.020]  determination.
[27:32.020 --> 27:37.180]  It is no such thing.
[27:37.180 --> 27:46.900]  Your only purpose here is to set the record, craft your arguments, put them in writing,
[27:46.900 --> 27:48.260]  put them before the court.
[27:48.260 --> 27:52.300]  You don't care what the court does.
[27:52.300 --> 27:54.300]  It doesn't matter.
[27:54.300 --> 27:57.500]  You're there to set the record.
[27:57.500 --> 28:03.380]  Appeals courts where you can expect to win your case, not at the trial level.
[28:03.380 --> 28:04.380]  Right.
[28:04.380 --> 28:12.300]  It would be nice if you won it at the trial level, but if you win it at the trial level,
[28:12.300 --> 28:15.620]  the other side's going to appeal.
[28:15.620 --> 28:16.620]  Right.
[28:16.620 --> 28:25.780]  So, think in terms of how do I get my arguments on the record?
[28:25.780 --> 28:26.780]  That's your only purpose.
[28:26.780 --> 28:33.140]  It is the purpose of the trial court to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of
[28:33.140 --> 28:37.340]  evidence, then apply the laws that comes to him to the facts in the case.
[28:37.340 --> 28:42.620]  So you need to get facts and law on the record.
[28:42.620 --> 28:45.580]  I need my causes of action.
[28:45.580 --> 28:49.060]  Yes, I am.
[28:49.060 --> 28:55.180]  You need your claims and you need the law in support of your claims.
[28:55.180 --> 29:02.660]  You need to state the facts in terms of the elements of the cause of action and then cite
[29:02.660 --> 29:07.860]  law that supports the decision that you want them to come to.
[29:07.860 --> 29:14.860]  Read any brief or treat us that's exactly what they do.
[29:14.860 --> 29:19.060]  Yeah, right, Randy.
[29:19.060 --> 29:23.740]  And all they're doing is getting the facts and law on a record.
[29:23.740 --> 29:24.740]  Yeah.
[29:24.740 --> 29:28.900]  Last question, Randy.
[29:28.900 --> 29:38.700]  Well, as I said in JP court, the management team all lied about moving my furniture from
[29:38.700 --> 29:43.500]  my room into the living room.
[29:43.500 --> 29:47.420]  How can I work that into a cause of action?
[29:47.420 --> 29:54.540]  That's a tort.
[29:54.540 --> 30:01.820]  They denied you a due process by commissioning aggravated poetry.
[30:01.820 --> 30:03.140]  All aboard.
[30:03.140 --> 30:07.660]  When mold spread through the dorms of St. Mary's College in Maryland, the school relocated
[30:07.660 --> 30:09.700]  its students to a cruise ship.
[30:09.700 --> 30:15.620]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht with an ocean tale of kids sailing through college next.
[30:15.620 --> 30:17.220]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.220 --> 30:20.820]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.820 --> 30:25.620]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.620 --> 30:30.740]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.740 --> 30:33.380]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.380 --> 30:37.700]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search
[30:37.700 --> 30:41.220]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.220 --> 30:43.460]  Start over with Start Page.
[30:43.460 --> 30:49.580]  After tropical storm Irene swept through Maryland, mold spread like wildfire through the dorms
[30:49.580 --> 30:51.340]  of St. Mary's College.
[30:51.340 --> 30:54.020]  Two hundred and fifty students had to be relocated.
[30:54.020 --> 30:55.020]  But where?
[30:55.020 --> 30:56.020]  Hotels?
[30:56.020 --> 30:58.540]  Well that cost a fortune, twenty thousand a day.
[30:58.540 --> 31:01.180]  So St. Mary's President came up with a way with an idea.
[31:01.180 --> 31:03.660]  How about putting the students up on a cruise ship?
[31:03.660 --> 31:08.660]  It just so happened, the sea voyager cruise ship was on its way down from Maine, with
[31:08.660 --> 31:13.180]  the owners mind docking in Maryland and turning their vessel into a floating dorm?
[31:13.180 --> 31:14.180]  No problem.
[31:14.180 --> 31:19.220]  So now the students are enjoying fine onboard dining, sweet looking sweets, and a breathtaking
[31:19.220 --> 31:20.740]  waterfront view.
[31:20.740 --> 31:22.100]  Talk about smooth sailing.
[31:22.100 --> 31:30.820]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.820 --> 31:36.180]  This is Building 7, a forty seven story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[31:36.180 --> 31:38.380]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.380 --> 31:43.260]  However, fifteen hundred architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.260 --> 31:45.980]  Over six thousand of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:45.980 --> 31:48.700]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:48.700 --> 31:49.700]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:49.700 --> 31:50.700]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:50.700 --> 31:51.700]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:51.700 --> 31:52.700]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:52.700 --> 31:53.700]  I'm the father who lost his son.
[31:53.700 --> 31:54.700]  We are Americans.
[31:54.700 --> 31:55.700]  And we deserve the truth.
[31:55.700 --> 31:56.700]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[31:56.700 --> 31:57.700]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[31:57.700 --> 31:58.700]  In today's America we live in an us against them society.
[31:58.700 --> 31:59.700]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to
[31:59.700 --> 32:00.700]  stand and defend our own rights.
[32:00.700 --> 32:01.700]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place.
[32:01.700 --> 32:02.700]  The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to do so.
[32:02.700 --> 32:03.700]  The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to do so.
[32:03.700 --> 32:04.700]  The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to do so.
[32:04.700 --> 32:29.700]  The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to do so.
[32:29.700 --> 32:32.760]  comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due
[32:32.760 --> 32:36.540]  process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of
[32:36.540 --> 32:40.340]  this invaluable material by going to rulelawradio.com and ordering your copy
[32:40.340 --> 32:43.260]  today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas
[32:43.260 --> 32:46.700]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original
[32:46.700 --> 32:50.260]  2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource
[32:50.260 --> 32:53.060]  material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:53.060 --> 32:56.980]  from rulelawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the
[32:56.980 --> 33:00.580]  free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.580 --> 33:20.580]  Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:30.580 --> 33:41.260]  Okay we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, a rule of law radio on this the
[33:41.260 --> 33:49.180]  23rd day of March 2017 and we're talking to Dave in Texas. Dave have you filed
[33:49.180 --> 33:58.580]  aggravated perjury charges against these individuals yet? Not yet. Why not?
[33:58.580 --> 34:11.700]  Well when I talked to Eddie he said that I didn't have any proof to pin these
[34:11.700 --> 34:25.060]  guys down. Who cares? Okay. You're not a lawyer. You don't have to prove the
[34:25.060 --> 34:34.100]  accusations. Just make them. When you make them the prosecutor refused to act and
[34:34.100 --> 34:38.460]  then you get to kick the prosecutor and annoy him and get him annoyed at these
[34:38.460 --> 34:47.020]  guys. If these you have this nurse that will testify to what they actually did.
[34:47.020 --> 34:52.820]  Well she may not want to but who cares what she wants. At the end of the day this
[34:52.820 --> 35:01.700]  is your life. I just have a string. Yeah. Okay well that's very interesting that
[35:01.700 --> 35:12.460]  would be a criminal case. Yes. Would it now there were four individuals who lied.
[35:12.460 --> 35:25.260]  Is that for separate criminal cases? Yes. By least one of them separately. Okay.
[35:25.260 --> 35:36.180]  Okay good good. Okay they have nothing to do essentially with the civil case.
[35:36.180 --> 35:43.220]  Criminal that's a whole separate issue. You have no standing to prosecute
[35:43.220 --> 35:50.460]  criminal. You just make the accusations and expect your public officials to act
[35:50.460 --> 35:57.540]  on your accusations in accordance with law. And when they don't then you file
[35:57.540 --> 36:04.900]  against your public officials. And it's just a noise to crap out of them. And they
[36:04.900 --> 36:10.340]  can't do anything to you because you're the complainant. They can't say anything
[36:10.340 --> 36:16.460]  that you might in any way interpret as a threat or that's felony retaliation. So
[36:16.460 --> 36:22.660]  the only one they can get mad at is the guys you're filing against. It's all
[36:22.660 --> 36:31.820]  politics. Okay so I don't I don't go to the police station but I go to the court
[36:31.820 --> 36:36.900]  criminal division. No there is no no every
[36:36.900 --> 36:46.580]  majest every judge is a magistrate. Criminal civil makes no difference. So the
[36:46.580 --> 36:51.100]  best place to do it give it to a judge. The judge is going to refuse to act to
[36:51.100 --> 36:55.580]  it say oh you take this the police department. And then you go to the
[36:55.580 --> 37:00.460]  district attorney with criminal charge against the judge. And then when the
[37:00.460 --> 37:05.140]  district attorney refuses to act on your charges against the judge you take
[37:05.140 --> 37:08.660]  criminal charges against district attorney the grand jury. And you're gonna
[37:08.660 --> 37:13.820]  have all these guys are hopping up and down. And they are going they're gonna
[37:13.820 --> 37:18.220]  be real unhappy and they're gonna send their investigator out there to let
[37:18.220 --> 37:24.780]  them know how unhappy they are. And now you've got guys out here that got on the
[37:24.780 --> 37:30.940]  stand in the light to the court for their boss. And now you're trying to get
[37:30.940 --> 37:37.500]  them put in prison. You're gonna be at the eviction hearing? Pardon me. Should I use
[37:37.500 --> 37:44.860]  the same judge who's gonna be taking care of my eviction? No. Or that one. Yeah I
[37:44.860 --> 37:50.940]  don't know try the same judge it won't hurt. I do it to a more time which ever
[37:50.940 --> 37:57.620]  one I happen to be in front of. Okay. So you go into this county judge and you take
[37:57.620 --> 38:01.980]  him criminal charges against these people for aggravated perjury in the
[38:01.980 --> 38:08.060]  original trial. But you need an affidavit from someone who actually saw the
[38:08.060 --> 38:15.820]  furniture moved down at the bedroom. Okay. And if you have to you can subpoena
[38:15.820 --> 38:32.860]  them. You can do a 202 discovery to preserve evidence. You can depose this nurse.
[38:32.860 --> 38:40.460]  This nurse always she can say is that I I had a major operation I could not have
[38:40.460 --> 38:47.140]  physically done it. Okay. Did they did these guys admit that the furniture was
[38:47.140 --> 38:58.060]  not in the bedroom? No. They admitted they were there. I'm sorry. Did they did
[38:58.060 --> 39:07.100]  they is it a question as to whether or not the furniture was out of room? That
[39:07.100 --> 39:13.660]  was not a question. Okay. So they admitted that this they're saying you moved
[39:13.660 --> 39:21.420]  it out and you're saying they moved it out. They well I put that up to them in
[39:21.420 --> 39:25.780]  court and they're saying that they don't know how it got out of my room and into
[39:25.780 --> 39:37.780]  that to their living room. Okay. Then that should go to a grand jury. Good. Okay.
[39:37.780 --> 39:42.860]  Charge them give it to the judge when the judge refuses to act on it file against
[39:42.860 --> 39:50.700]  the judge and move to disqualify him. Let's make their lives miserable. You can
[39:50.700 --> 39:55.800]  do that and there's not anything they can do about it. They're planning on
[39:55.800 --> 40:02.340]  really against you anyway. And you have counsel but counsel don't have
[40:02.340 --> 40:08.420]  anything to do with these criminal charges. And if counsel asks you about the
[40:08.420 --> 40:14.500]  criminal charges he's telling us not his business. He's your civil attorney not
[40:14.500 --> 40:26.300]  your criminal. So put out. Okay. All right. All right. Okay. Randy. Okay. Thanks. Good
[40:26.300 --> 40:33.300]  luck. All right. Thank you. Okay. Thank you Dave. Okay. Now we're gonna go to
[40:33.300 --> 40:41.140]  Olivier in Tennessee. Hello Olivier. Hey Lawrence. Good good. What do you have for us
[40:41.140 --> 40:51.140]  today? Well I was going to ask you about the brief. What do you think about it?
[40:51.140 --> 40:56.940]  About it. Did you? I sent it back to you. Did you get the copy I sent to you? I
[40:56.940 --> 41:06.860]  did. Okay. You need to pull up some briefs and look at them. Yeah. The first
[41:06.860 --> 41:15.620]  thing you want to do is in a brief on appeal is state the issues you are
[41:15.620 --> 41:21.340]  appealing. And you had those in there but they weren't the first thing. So you
[41:21.340 --> 41:26.940]  might notice I copied part of your brief and moved it down. The appeal court gave
[41:26.940 --> 41:31.220]  us a format to write it in and I was following that format. They mailed us a
[41:31.220 --> 41:38.140]  format so that the judge expected to write it in. Will you send me a copy of
[41:38.140 --> 41:51.940]  that format? Okay. Because in the first paragraph I mean the first section you
[41:51.940 --> 42:00.900]  what I would expect to be there is a general notice of what this is about.
[42:00.900 --> 42:08.660]  But you went into argumentation based on issues and it was way too soon for that.
[42:08.660 --> 42:15.860]  That kind of stuff goes in your argument and support. And generally when I see an
[42:15.860 --> 42:19.980]  appeal the appeal starts out with these are the issues I'm bringing before the
[42:19.980 --> 42:27.020]  court. Did the trial court error when they made this ruling and did the error
[42:27.020 --> 42:34.100]  when they made this ruling? All of them I've seen start out that way too.
[42:34.100 --> 42:41.140]  If this court requires something else that's surprising. But send me a copy of
[42:41.140 --> 42:49.700]  it. Okay. Every case that I filed they sent me a copy of it.
[42:49.700 --> 42:56.580]  Send me a copy. Did you look at the formatting that I did? Yes. It's
[42:56.580 --> 43:02.220]  similar. It just certain things are out of order. So I read put it I move one
[43:02.220 --> 43:08.340]  chapter for it back in order. Okay. The way there is not where it was. No no no I'm not
[43:08.340 --> 43:15.380]  talking about content now. I'm talking about formatting. No. The the styles
[43:15.380 --> 43:25.380]  headings. Okay. Okay. The way that they have it or the way that the package
[43:25.380 --> 43:33.460]  seems when you read it then they're too concerned about the formatting. No no no
[43:33.460 --> 43:41.700]  you're missing the point Olivier. Okay. You're writing a complex document. The music
[43:41.700 --> 43:47.420]  coming up. Yeah it is. We'll pick this up on the other side Randy Calton rules
[43:47.420 --> 44:02.860]  our radio. I call it number five one two six four six nineteen eighty four. We'll be
[44:02.860 --> 44:06.340]  right back. Hello my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I
[44:06.340 --> 44:10.820]  would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street sweet D
[44:10.820 --> 44:14.620]  here in Austin Texas find brave new books and chase back to see all our
[44:14.620 --> 44:18.660]  fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. Have a look at
[44:18.660 --> 44:22.540]  our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take
[44:22.540 --> 44:25.660]  a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian
[44:25.660 --> 44:30.540]  emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps and colloidal silver and gold. Call five
[44:30.540 --> 44:36.900]  one two two six four four zero four three or find us online at naturespureorganics.com
[44:36.900 --> 44:42.420]  that's five one two two six four four zero four three naturespureorganics.com
[44:42.420 --> 44:46.460]  don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products
[44:46.460 --> 44:50.700]  naturespureorganics.com
[45:00.060 --> 45:05.700]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[45:05.700 --> 45:11.340]  with jurisdictionary. The affordable easy to understand poor CD course that will
[45:11.340 --> 45:17.460]  show you how in 24 hours death by step. If you have a lawyer know what your
[45:17.460 --> 45:21.820]  lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for
[45:21.820 --> 45:27.500]  yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[45:27.500 --> 45:32.340]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[45:32.340 --> 45:37.180]  case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what
[45:37.180 --> 45:41.580]  everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[45:41.580 --> 45:47.300]  our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[45:47.300 --> 45:54.700]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[45:54.700 --> 46:21.700]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:21.700 --> 46:26.860]  Okay we are back. Randy Kelton rule of law radio and we're talking to Olivier in
[46:26.860 --> 46:37.620]  Tennessee. The point of the styles is to help you construct a large document. When
[46:37.620 --> 46:43.900]  you're finished you can take all those out but when you write a large document
[46:43.900 --> 46:48.900]  especially if you don't have a lot of experience at it and I have a lot of
[46:48.900 --> 46:54.900]  experience at it and I still have these problems where I wind up drifting to my
[46:54.900 --> 47:00.460]  favorite topics over and over. So I wind up talking about the same things in
[47:00.460 --> 47:06.740]  several different places and it confuses my readers. So I started putting a
[47:06.740 --> 47:13.980]  heading on every paragraph and if you're using Microsoft Word and you use their
[47:13.980 --> 47:20.380]  styles feature, I type in a heading and then I go up to the styles feature and
[47:20.380 --> 47:26.300]  that's a way of formatting it to make it look different and I select heading one
[47:26.300 --> 47:33.180]  two or three and it puts a different format on it so it stands out but it
[47:33.180 --> 47:40.980]  also puts it in the navigation pane. So if you go to view navigation pane it pops
[47:40.980 --> 47:49.420]  up a box on the side of the screen that lists all of these style headings. So
[47:49.420 --> 47:54.700]  when I do a complex document I put one on every paragraph as I move down the
[47:54.700 --> 48:02.620]  page and when I put in a heading I try to make sure that I contain my argument
[48:02.620 --> 48:10.940]  in that paragraph to the subject that's in that heading and then when I get the
[48:10.940 --> 48:19.220]  document pretty well laid out then I go down and look at those headings and see
[48:19.220 --> 48:25.020]  if I have similar headings in different places and as you go down these headings
[48:25.020 --> 48:33.420]  a lot of times it'll be clear that you have arguments out of place that you're
[48:33.420 --> 48:39.100]  arguing things to us three times. Once you do that then you can move these
[48:39.100 --> 48:45.020]  arguments around and get them all lined up so they follow in order and then
[48:45.020 --> 48:49.660]  when you're done the last thing you can do is remove those headings. I always leave
[48:49.660 --> 48:59.180]  mine in. The reason I leave them in is it makes the document much easier for a
[48:59.180 --> 49:05.620]  human being to be able to read and understand but the primary reason I use
[49:05.620 --> 49:10.580]  them is to help to construct a well-crafted document. Does that make
[49:10.580 --> 49:17.420]  sense Olivier? Yes well that's what makes it a complex document when you go
[49:17.420 --> 49:22.140]  through the procedures. The example that they showed me was simple. A simple
[49:22.140 --> 49:27.100]  heading of what that page or that next section was going to talk about. There was
[49:27.100 --> 49:35.100]  their own descriptive language whatever the appealing or language argument
[49:35.100 --> 49:40.060]  was about that title then everything in that section referred back to the title.
[49:40.060 --> 49:49.740]  So yours I do understand what you're saying but theirs is not as complicated as
[49:49.740 --> 49:57.180]  yours is not. It's written just as I sent it to you that mine was written but I
[49:57.180 --> 50:04.020]  didn't finish certain sections because I was just getting the overview of I want
[50:04.020 --> 50:08.060]  to get an overview. Certain sections I didn't fit in because I didn't have time to
[50:08.060 --> 50:13.500]  go get all the information that I researched and fill it in. Yeah I
[50:13.500 --> 50:17.580]  saw that I got that I understood that from the document this was you're just
[50:17.580 --> 50:23.220]  kind of organizing how you're going to write it. Right well I took yours and I
[50:23.220 --> 50:28.220]  reformatted it but I took your format and put it in the sequence that they
[50:28.220 --> 50:36.540]  wanted to see it. Okay there was another one other thing that you did. You
[50:36.540 --> 50:47.460]  hand coded numbering. Never hand coded numbering in Word. There's a section right
[50:47.460 --> 50:54.260]  next to the styles section where you can put in bullets or numbering. So you
[50:54.260 --> 51:01.820]  select the the section that you want numbered and you go up to the there's
[51:01.820 --> 51:10.460]  the right to the left of the styles box is a box where you can select bullets or
[51:10.460 --> 51:15.580]  numbering. You click on that down arrow and it opens a box and you can pick the
[51:15.580 --> 51:21.540]  style of numbering you want and you set numbering on it. That way if you add a
[51:21.540 --> 51:27.620]  paragraph it'll readjust all the numbers and include your new number in there. I
[51:27.620 --> 51:33.780]  have went over documents for people where I have had to go in and readjust
[51:33.780 --> 51:43.340]  over a hundred numbers drove me insane. So when I get them that way now the first
[51:43.340 --> 51:49.020]  thing I do is take out those numbers and have word automatically number it. That
[51:49.020 --> 51:55.700]  way you can grab one of those sentences and move it up one or add a section in
[51:55.700 --> 52:00.980]  between and the system will renumber it. Every time you put in a hard return it'll
[52:00.980 --> 52:05.460]  add a number to it and make that make your life a whole lot easier. The whole
[52:05.460 --> 52:10.100]  reason for that formatting was to make your life a whole lot easier when you're
[52:10.100 --> 52:17.460]  creating these documents. All right now the section I got a little question about
[52:17.460 --> 52:23.940]  the section that it had dedicated for statements of the case or statement for
[52:23.940 --> 52:31.460]  review. What I was going to do I listed the questions I don't do on my arguments
[52:31.460 --> 52:37.380]  were answering each one of those questions with case law that I found in
[52:37.380 --> 52:42.180]  statutes that are relevant to the questions that were submitted. Yeah
[52:42.180 --> 52:47.700]  exactly right you start out by this is an appeal so you can't argue any new
[52:47.700 --> 52:55.980]  issues here. You can only address a ruling that the trial court made that you
[52:55.980 --> 53:04.020]  think is an error. So that's why you put in that list of did the judge error when
[53:04.020 --> 53:08.420]  he did this? Did he error when he did this? Did he error? Did he list those
[53:08.420 --> 53:14.620]  points that you're going to go to? Then when you do your argument in support the
[53:14.620 --> 53:19.300]  next thing you do is a statement of facts and then when you do your argument
[53:19.300 --> 53:25.980]  in support you do all of these in that exact same format because that's what
[53:25.980 --> 53:34.740]  you set the reader up to expect. But when you write your facts make sure you
[53:34.740 --> 53:41.700]  I'd like to write my argument first. Then I'm going to when I do my facts I make
[53:41.700 --> 53:47.940]  sure I lay my facts in there so they support my argument. Does that make
[53:47.940 --> 53:55.780]  sense? Instead of just putting in a bunch of facts you only want to put in facts
[53:55.780 --> 54:03.500]  that are relevant to your argument or facts that are undeniable that will
[54:03.500 --> 54:07.820]  absolutely come out whether they're helpful to your argument or not you have
[54:07.820 --> 54:12.620]  to put them in there. But then you get to put them in and then argue why they
[54:12.620 --> 54:19.260]  don't they're not controlling. But primarily you wanted the the most
[54:19.260 --> 54:27.340]  artful part of your documents going to be your statement of facts. I think you'll
[54:27.340 --> 54:34.340]  better understand what you've been through the whole process. Right. Alright, one more
[54:34.340 --> 54:40.580]  one more. This question goes to him. I want to meet you inside on it. I found a
[54:40.580 --> 54:50.340]  public policy expected which says that it's illegal for any government entity to
[54:50.340 --> 55:00.900]  use legal code, born law, regulation against the natural person or their
[55:00.900 --> 55:09.420]  property. What does natural person mean in Tennessee law? Natural person is
[55:09.420 --> 55:17.620]  someone born natural person. I forgot. No, no, no, yeah, yeah we have to have to have a
[55:17.620 --> 55:25.220]  legal definition of that. This is where they relay traps for us. No, what is in
[55:25.220 --> 55:30.220]  is listed in the natural person is the person that's protected by the
[55:30.220 --> 55:33.940]  Constitution. It's written in the statute. I don't have it in front of me to read it
[55:33.940 --> 55:38.620]  out to you. Okay. Well, basically you're playing he says that anyone anyone who has
[55:38.620 --> 55:45.620]  rights protected by the Constitution is the public policy that no law, foreign
[55:45.620 --> 56:00.100]  code or everything, no law, foreign code or legal contract can violate the
[56:00.100 --> 56:07.940]  natural rights of person which is constitutional rights. Okay, that's just
[56:07.940 --> 56:16.700]  to declare us that all laws have to be in paramateria with the Constitution. Right.
[56:16.700 --> 56:27.380]  Okay. So now, right, so now I get to use that against them in the field. I'm not
[56:27.380 --> 56:32.980]  sure where you're going. Do I get to use that statute? That's gonna be a good
[56:32.980 --> 56:44.660]  argument as far as ill-attentive law says. If you can argue that the statute, the way
[56:44.660 --> 56:51.860]  it is being enforced has the effect of denying a constitutional right where a
[56:51.860 --> 56:59.380]  statute may on its face not be a constitutional violation, it can become a
[56:59.380 --> 57:04.420]  constitutional violation by the way it's applied and absolutely you could argue
[57:04.420 --> 57:11.980]  that. No, no, it's not a statute. It's not a statute. It's the act that occurred. Any
[57:11.980 --> 57:20.300]  act, law or if that's... Okay, hold on. Look up your terms. Look up act. Act is
[57:20.300 --> 57:29.820]  going to be a legislative enactment. I assure you. It won't be the doing of something.
[57:29.820 --> 57:34.300]  I'm speaking normal. I'm not speaking legally. I'm speaking normal English, the
[57:34.300 --> 57:38.900]  act. Something like you have to harm. If someone has to harm the contract or law
[57:38.900 --> 57:43.320]  or something has to harm someone's constitutional rights. But speaking
[57:43.320 --> 57:49.460]  English, not legally, you say. Oh, okay, okay. I thought you were quoting me some
[57:49.460 --> 57:54.740]  statute. I'm missing what you're saying here. The act. You're saying no one can do
[57:54.740 --> 58:00.300]  a thing that has the effect of violating the right of substance. Of course. Of a
[58:00.300 --> 58:08.220]  national person. Of course you can argue that. I mean, that's absolutely primary.
[58:08.220 --> 58:15.420]  You got the music coming up again. Okay, hang on. Randy Kelton, Move Law Radio. A
[58:15.420 --> 58:21.540]  call-in number is 512-646-1984. Scott Rick Barrett, I see you there. I'll try to
[58:21.540 --> 58:27.620]  get to everybody. This is the top of the hour, so it's a good time to go to Logos
[58:27.620 --> 58:33.700]  Radio Network and check out our fundraiser and our gun giveaway. And
[58:33.700 --> 58:49.620]  Randy's e-book. There's legal 101. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[58:49.620 --> 58:55.220]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. Yet countless readers are
[58:55.220 --> 58:59.780]  frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try
[58:59.780 --> 59:04.820]  to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound
[59:04.820 --> 59:10.060]  meaning of the Scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new
[59:10.060 --> 59:14.980]  translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.980 --> 59:20.260]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are
[59:20.260 --> 59:24.940]  opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word
[59:24.940 --> 59:29.820]  beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to
[59:29.820 --> 59:34.540]  give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet
[59:34.540 --> 59:43.260]  compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.260 --> 59:52.020]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:52.020 --> 59:59.940]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at www.logosradionetwork.com.
[59:59.940 --> 01:00:05.940]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Low Star Lowdowns. Markets for
[01:00:05.940 --> 01:00:12.460]  Wednesday the 22nd of March 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,249.63
[01:00:12.460 --> 01:00:15.260]  amounts, silver $17.56
[01:00:15.260 --> 01:00:20.900]  amounts, Texas Crude $47.34 a barrel, and Bitcoin is just over a
[01:00:20.900 --> 01:00:32.820]  thousand city at a thousand nineteen U.S. currency. Today in history the year 1784
[01:00:32.820 --> 01:00:36.820]  the Emerald Buddha considered the Palladium of the Kingdom of Thailand is
[01:00:36.820 --> 01:00:41.260]  moved with a great ceremony to its current location in Wat Phra Kau Thailand.
[01:00:41.260 --> 01:00:51.060]  Today in history he had recent news a John Reveal 29-year-old Marine veteran who served in
[01:00:51.060 --> 01:00:54.540]  Iraq and Afghanistan is being charged with one count of aggravated assault with
[01:00:54.540 --> 01:00:58.260]  a deadly weapon along with a hate crime for sending a tweet to Dallas based
[01:00:58.260 --> 01:01:02.100]  journalist senior writer and newsweek and contributing editor of Vanity Fair
[01:01:02.100 --> 01:01:06.620]  Kurt Etchenwald which led him to having a seizure. John Reveal was arrested as
[01:01:06.620 --> 01:01:11.100]  Maryland home on a federal cyber stalking charge. Etchenwald described that on the
[01:01:11.100 --> 01:01:15.420]  15th of December someone tweeted a flashing animated image of him that had
[01:01:15.420 --> 01:01:18.900]  induced him into an eight minute epileptic seizure which included the
[01:01:18.900 --> 01:01:22.820]  message you deserve a seizure for your post. After the police were called and
[01:01:22.820 --> 01:01:26.660]  notified by Etchenwald's wife Dallas police served Twitter with a search warrant
[01:01:26.660 --> 01:01:30.660]  for the user account at Jude Goldstein. Some of the messages recovered from the
[01:01:30.660 --> 01:01:34.260]  account concerning Etchenwald stated that I know he has epilepsy I hope to
[01:01:34.260 --> 01:01:38.220]  send him into a seizure and let's see if he dies. In charging Reveal with
[01:01:38.220 --> 01:01:41.820]  cyber stalking the FBI concluded that the tweet had been sent with the intent to
[01:01:41.820 --> 01:01:46.140]  kill, injure, harass and intimidate and today Monday a Dallas County grand jury
[01:01:46.140 --> 01:01:49.860]  indicted Reveal stating that he knew Etchenwald was susceptible to epileptic
[01:01:49.860 --> 01:01:54.860]  seizures and used them as a deadly weapon that is the animated images in the tweet
[01:01:54.860 --> 01:01:58.940]  to assault him. The hate crime was added to the charge due to Reveal's bias or
[01:01:58.940 --> 01:02:02.300]  prejudice against persons of Jewish faith or dissent.
[01:02:02.300 --> 01:02:09.620]  Published this week in Nature Plants MIT and their collaborators have
[01:02:09.620 --> 01:02:13.940]  designed a microfluidic device they call tree on a chip. The simple setup which
[01:02:13.940 --> 01:02:18.340]  mimics the osmosis and trees allows a chip to passively pump water from the
[01:02:18.340 --> 01:02:22.940]  tank through the chip into a beaker at a constant flow rate for several days as
[01:02:22.940 --> 01:02:27.540]  opposed to the previous designs which only pumped for several minutes and it
[01:02:27.540 --> 01:02:32.340]  Hosoie professor and associate department head for operations and MIT's Department
[01:02:32.340 --> 01:02:36.380]  of Mechanical Engineering envisions that the tree on a chip pump may be built
[01:02:36.380 --> 01:02:40.180]  into small robots for production of hydraulic power without requiring
[01:02:40.180 --> 01:02:45.540]  active pumps or parts. The long-star lowdown is currently for sponsors
[01:02:45.540 --> 01:02:48.860]  so if you're applying for a service site to advertise with us feel free to give
[01:02:48.860 --> 01:02:59.660]  a call at T10-363-2257. This was first rodeo with your lowdown for March 22nd, 2017.
[01:03:18.860 --> 01:03:40.460]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rue Blanc Radio, and Olivier. This is not really a great topic for radio. Why don't you call me tomorrow?
[01:03:40.460 --> 01:03:46.620]  We'll talk about this off the air. It takes a little too long and it's too
[01:03:46.620 --> 01:03:52.700]  specific for everybody else to really understand what's going on. So call me
[01:03:52.700 --> 01:03:59.940]  during the day. Okay. Okay, thank you. Okay, now we're going to Rick in Texas.
[01:03:59.940 --> 01:04:13.380]  Hello, Rick. Hello, Randy. Can you hear me? Yes. Is this the Rick the ticket slayer?
[01:04:13.380 --> 01:04:22.220]  Our good friend encouraged me to call in and tell me this story. September 25th
[01:04:22.220 --> 01:04:30.420]  of last year I went mudding on a road but I didn't know it was part of the
[01:04:30.420 --> 01:04:38.140]  school's property. As you turn off the road in Marble Falls Highway 1431 there
[01:04:38.140 --> 01:04:46.700]  are two roads that make a 90-degree turn from the school. According to the cop, one
[01:04:46.700 --> 01:04:52.660]  to the left is not part of Faith Academy property. It goes out to a private
[01:04:52.660 --> 01:04:58.620]  drive. One to the right was behind the stands, the football field, everything. I
[01:04:58.620 --> 01:05:03.500]  really didn't know it was part of their property. So I was exploring on it. It was
[01:05:03.500 --> 01:05:12.060]  it was muddy. They had called the police. They gave me a ticket. The pre-trial was
[01:05:12.060 --> 01:05:20.900]  set for November 30th of last year. I showed up, followed my agreement. That
[01:05:20.900 --> 01:05:27.220]  day they were going to pay and a jury trial. They had told me it was a glass
[01:05:27.220 --> 01:05:37.180]  sea misdemeanor and they said, you know, so you don't want to deal. I don't feel
[01:05:37.180 --> 01:05:41.260]  like I damaged anything. There was no signage out there as in no trespassing,
[01:05:41.260 --> 01:05:50.580]  no private property. Wait a minute. As I understand it, you destroyed some mud.
[01:05:50.580 --> 01:05:59.180]  That's correct. Now I read an article in the local paper about how a fire
[01:05:59.180 --> 01:06:13.540]  destroyed 80 acres and I thought, how do you destroy dirt? Anyway, you must know
[01:06:13.540 --> 01:06:19.500]  how to destroy dirt. They're claiming this was the school track and in fact it
[01:06:19.500 --> 01:06:27.940]  is their school cross-country track. That has been verified. Is it labeled as a
[01:06:27.940 --> 01:06:35.620]  track and private property? It's not. When the road to the right takes a 90-degree
[01:06:35.620 --> 01:06:40.780]  turn, it does go inside the faith academy sign. So everyone's telling me like,
[01:06:40.780 --> 01:06:44.180]  well, you know, the cops like, well, you should know it's right here. I'm like, well,
[01:06:44.180 --> 01:06:48.260]  still, I'm not really sure. It looks like a road to me. Again, there's
[01:06:48.260 --> 01:06:53.700]  no signage that it's anything at all. There's no signage of any kind. There's
[01:06:53.700 --> 01:07:01.260]  no fences to stay out. Is there no trespassing sign? No trespassing, no
[01:07:01.260 --> 01:07:07.580]  no trespassing, no private property, no purple fence post, nothing. Then there is
[01:07:07.580 --> 01:07:14.820]  no claim. This is what an officer told me once. I had a friend drop off a
[01:07:14.820 --> 01:07:21.180]  propane tank in my yard and he was having an issue with his father. And his
[01:07:21.180 --> 01:07:25.460]  father come along and he wanted to take the tank. He had Tom, the chief of police,
[01:07:25.460 --> 01:07:30.920]  good friend of mine with him. And I said, you can't take that tank. You leave that
[01:07:30.920 --> 01:07:38.580]  where it says on my private property. He said, yes, I can. You don't have a no
[01:07:38.580 --> 01:07:46.620]  trespassing sign and there is no barrier. If you had sticks in the ground with a
[01:07:46.620 --> 01:07:53.340]  piece of string tied to those sticks crossing this entryway, I could not pass
[01:07:53.340 --> 01:08:01.700]  it. But you don't have anything so I can pass. That's why I asked that question.
[01:08:01.700 --> 01:08:10.220]  There was no barrier marking out that property. So you can you can traverse
[01:08:10.220 --> 01:08:16.740]  the property under Texas law. That's what I thought. So when I told the
[01:08:16.740 --> 01:08:21.820]  prosecuting, the assistant prosecutor that she says, Mr. Renfrew, you're not being
[01:08:21.820 --> 01:08:26.660]  charged with trespassing. You're being charged with disruption of property. So I
[01:08:26.660 --> 01:08:31.980]  said, well, that's fine. I will appeal from here to the county court and then
[01:08:31.980 --> 01:08:35.180]  I'll take it to the court in Austin. Just told her I would go all the way there
[01:08:35.180 --> 01:08:41.300]  and be prepared for it. But they sent me for a jury trial on January 19th. Their
[01:08:41.300 --> 01:08:46.620]  clerk had called me on my phone the day before he left me a voicemail. They didn't
[01:08:46.620 --> 01:08:51.380]  send anything through the mail. They sent a voicemail. She's saying, Mr. Renfrew,
[01:08:51.380 --> 01:08:55.420]  the prosecuting attorney's got some stuff coming up. We're going to cancel your
[01:08:55.420 --> 01:09:04.380]  trial tomorrow and reset. They reset for March 22nd yesterday. Our good friend
[01:09:04.380 --> 01:09:10.700]  showed up, which I'm very glad because he witnessed this. I thought there was
[01:09:10.700 --> 01:09:15.260]  something up and there was because there's no jury, there's no cop, there's
[01:09:15.260 --> 01:09:19.300]  nothing. The assistant prosecuting attorney that I did not deal with
[01:09:19.300 --> 01:09:23.340]  originally, there's a different one there, after he had dealt with a couple of
[01:09:23.340 --> 01:09:28.260]  people with their traffic issues. He says, Mr. Renfrew, I've got something here
[01:09:28.260 --> 01:09:36.100]  for you. We're going to dismiss this and we're going to move it to county court
[01:09:36.100 --> 01:09:40.740]  and we're going to bump it up from a Class C misdemeanor to a Class A misdemeanor.
[01:09:40.740 --> 01:09:47.700]  Your affidavit of inability to pay will not fly up the road and be ready. So I
[01:09:47.700 --> 01:09:59.660]  said, awesome, let's go. Okay, I think you left some things out. Did you do some
[01:09:59.660 --> 01:10:05.900]  things to annoy them? I did a JCC, a judicial
[01:10:05.900 --> 01:10:11.100]  conduct complaint on the judge for missing some things, adventure,
[01:10:11.100 --> 01:10:14.700]  exclusionary hearings, some different things in the beginning, all the barred
[01:10:14.700 --> 01:10:19.540]  grievance on the attorney. So everyone looks very, very unhappy with me
[01:10:19.540 --> 01:10:29.420]  yesterday. I called today to see where the first JCC is. They said it's still in
[01:10:29.420 --> 01:10:34.460]  the investigation phase. So there's a second one coming since she signed off
[01:10:34.460 --> 01:10:39.500]  yesterday. There's also a barred grievance on this new attorney. I thought it'd be a
[01:10:39.500 --> 01:10:45.620]  malicious prosecution, but I'm thinking you might say it's only retaliation. I'm
[01:10:45.620 --> 01:10:52.340]  not really... That's where I would go. They originally charged you with a
[01:10:52.340 --> 01:11:04.180]  Class A misdemeanor and is there any indication that circumstances changed?
[01:11:04.180 --> 01:11:09.700]  They said they have pictures, they decided it's worth, you know, it's much more
[01:11:09.700 --> 01:11:19.980]  damage. It's $800 now. The sworn affidavit from the top listed as under 50.
[01:11:19.980 --> 01:11:29.900]  Okay, so after you filed bar grievances to the JCC complaints against the
[01:11:29.900 --> 01:11:36.700]  Actors, then all of a sudden they decided to change the charge. That sounds
[01:11:36.700 --> 01:11:45.180]  like felony retaliation to me. And I would sure want to bring that before a
[01:11:45.180 --> 01:11:51.060]  grand jury of my peers. Not their peers, but your peers.
[01:11:51.060 --> 01:12:00.060]  Do we go to... Do we go take sworn charges to a gay in Austin first? Is this
[01:12:00.060 --> 01:12:06.180]  Travis County? No, this is Burnett County, but I thought the DA that may
[01:12:06.180 --> 01:12:11.060]  oversee them. It looks like the players are going to be... I asked him yesterday, I
[01:12:11.060 --> 01:12:15.900]  went back and said... I asked him, I said, you know, you said we are going to do this.
[01:12:15.900 --> 01:12:23.460]  Who's we? Is it well the state? Well, me, Ryan Casano and possibly Eddie
[01:12:23.460 --> 01:12:30.020]  Ariando, he hit his boss. So I'm thinking the charges are going to be on those two,
[01:12:30.020 --> 01:12:36.300]  as well as Peggy Simons, the JP judge. It reads here, the provical cause
[01:12:36.300 --> 01:12:42.380]  affidavit originally was, did commit the offense of criminal mischief under $50.
[01:12:42.380 --> 01:12:49.580]  I'm very chill here, but I swear that on 9.25.16, the defendant rep wrote, blah, blah, blah.
[01:12:49.820 --> 01:12:55.940]  So they didn't determine that you did more damage than they originally thought
[01:12:55.940 --> 01:13:05.780]  until after you filed against them. That poisoned their will. The facts, the facts
[01:13:05.780 --> 01:13:17.380]  don't matter. Everything is political. Appearance is everything. So, you want to
[01:13:17.380 --> 01:13:21.460]  take this to a grand jury of your peers. Now, I have a whole routine for how to do...
[01:13:21.460 --> 01:13:33.300]  and I'll talk to our mutual friend, David. I know you're out there listening,
[01:13:33.300 --> 01:13:41.940]  David. You can't be behind that mutual friend thing. I would not want David
[01:13:41.940 --> 01:13:50.940]  after me, frankly. No, he's taught me well. I've used this class C's. So when it's
[01:13:50.940 --> 01:14:00.460]  happening, if they like, I'm glad I have David on my side to help out. So, you
[01:14:00.460 --> 01:14:14.100]  might look at, since David was there, get him to file on them. I'm talking, walking
[01:14:14.100 --> 01:14:21.460]  these guys through the criminal process. This reads felony retaliation to me.
[01:14:21.460 --> 01:14:30.820]  The problem they have is that when a prosecuting attorney is made known in
[01:14:30.820 --> 01:14:34.700]  any manner that a public official has violated a law related to his office, he
[01:14:34.700 --> 01:14:39.220]  shall reduce the amount of information submitted to the grand jury. No
[01:14:39.220 --> 01:14:46.700]  discretion, zero. 2.03 Texas Penal... Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, right up
[01:14:46.700 --> 01:14:52.180]  there in the front. Under duties of officers, first one shall be the primary
[01:14:52.180 --> 01:14:56.420]  duty of the prosecuting attorney, not to shaker conviction, but to ensure that
[01:14:56.420 --> 01:15:01.180]  justice is served. Well, that's nice, high-minded rhetoric, but we don't tell him
[01:15:01.180 --> 01:15:07.340]  to do anything. 2.02 says the prosecutor, the district attorney, will handle these
[01:15:07.340 --> 01:15:13.900]  cases. The county attorney will handle these cases. 2.03, the first one that puts
[01:15:13.900 --> 01:15:19.220]  a specific duty on a prosecuting attorney, tells him that when he gets a
[01:15:19.220 --> 01:15:27.020]  complaint against a public official, he is to present that to the grand jury. No
[01:15:27.020 --> 01:15:34.540]  discretion. They always exercise the discretion, so you want him to. So, you
[01:15:34.540 --> 01:15:40.260]  take criminal complaints. I suggest you take them first to either a county or
[01:15:40.260 --> 01:15:46.380]  a district judge. If you take it to a county judge, he's going to be very
[01:15:46.380 --> 01:15:50.380]  polite and say, oh, Mr. Rickford, you really need to take this to the police
[01:15:50.380 --> 01:15:56.660]  department. Oh, thank you, judge, for that sage advice. You leave and then you go to
[01:15:56.660 --> 01:16:02.780]  a district judge with criminal charges against a county judge, failing to act
[01:16:02.780 --> 01:16:09.020]  in his capacity as a magistrate. I did this in Tarrant County, gave him 53
[01:16:09.020 --> 01:16:14.020]  criminal complaints against judges and prosecutors. He took an hour reading them,
[01:16:14.020 --> 01:16:19.860]  came back and said, Mr. Kelton, you might understand that if I failed to act in the
[01:16:19.860 --> 01:16:25.300]  way that you did, you're prepared to file criminal charges against me. I said,
[01:16:25.300 --> 01:16:30.980]  with all due respect, your honor, in a heartbeat. He was the only one that took
[01:16:30.980 --> 01:16:35.540]  my complaints and did what he was supposed to. But point is, you go to them,
[01:16:35.540 --> 01:16:39.580]  they do something, they don't do what they're supposed to. You charge them. You
[01:16:39.580 --> 01:16:46.420]  get everybody be owed at this municipal judge and local po-duck chomp
[01:16:46.420 --> 01:16:53.540]  attorney. All political. Hang on, Randy Kelton, we have low radio. We'll be right
[01:16:53.540 --> 01:16:55.820]  back.
[01:16:59.260 --> 01:17:04.060]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls and letters or even
[01:17:04.060 --> 01:17:09.260]  losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Miros proven method. Michael
[01:17:09.260 --> 01:17:13.620]  Miros has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can
[01:17:13.620 --> 01:17:17.740]  win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to
[01:17:17.740 --> 01:17:22.220]  win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when contacted by
[01:17:22.220 --> 01:17:26.820]  phones, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get
[01:17:26.820 --> 01:17:30.660]  debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the financial tables on
[01:17:30.660 --> 01:17:35.780]  them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Miros proven method is the
[01:17:35.780 --> 01:17:39.740]  solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is
[01:17:39.740 --> 01:17:44.420]  available as well. For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:17:44.420 --> 01:17:49.100]  click on the blue Michael Miros banner or email Michael Miros at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.100 --> 01:17:56.940]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:56.940 --> 01:18:02.020]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love logos. Without the shows on this
[01:18:02.020 --> 01:18:05.900]  network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now
[01:18:05.900 --> 01:18:10.340]  that there's no going back. I need my truth fake. I'd be lost without logos and
[01:18:10.340 --> 01:18:14.220]  I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a
[01:18:14.220 --> 01:18:17.700]  show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to
[01:18:17.700 --> 01:18:23.220]  give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos? Well I'm glad you
[01:18:23.220 --> 01:18:27.500]  asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon you can help logos with ordering
[01:18:27.500 --> 01:18:32.100]  your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go
[01:18:32.100 --> 01:18:38.260]  to logosregualnetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you
[01:18:38.260 --> 01:18:43.820]  order anything from Amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay
[01:18:43.820 --> 01:18:48.180]  extra? No. Do you have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my
[01:18:48.180 --> 01:18:53.720]  Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any
[01:18:53.720 --> 01:19:21.820]  money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are Logos. Happy Holidays Logos.
[01:19:21.820 --> 01:19:26.080]  Okay we are back. Randy Kelton, Denver Stevens, Rural Radio and I just asked
[01:19:26.080 --> 01:19:31.120]  Scott to drop off and call back tomorrow night. Scott has got some really cool
[01:19:31.120 --> 01:19:36.400]  stuff and I was running out of time and I didn't want to short shrift him. You
[01:19:36.400 --> 01:19:39.960]  might want to make sure you you listen in tomorrow night. We're going to be
[01:19:39.960 --> 01:19:47.800]  talking about his dealings with our illustrious Attorney General. Okay, Rick.
[01:19:47.800 --> 01:19:54.600]  Yes. I don't know if David's talked about this or not but I understand you
[01:19:54.600 --> 01:20:01.720]  had fun with him on tickets. It's a whole other animal when you start crawling
[01:20:01.720 --> 01:20:07.880]  up the food chain. Yeah, he's been fine. He's caught me well. I've done well on
[01:20:07.880 --> 01:20:12.400]  five of them in all class C. You know they threw that twist in last night
[01:20:12.400 --> 01:20:20.240]  yesterday so I'm like yeah I need help. Okay here's my rule. Never interfere with
[01:20:20.240 --> 01:20:26.880]  somebody when they're screwing up and in this one they're screwing up big time.
[01:20:26.880 --> 01:20:35.440]  Something about these lower courts, they just don't get it. They do the
[01:20:35.440 --> 01:20:44.120]  dumbest stuff. This just reeks of felony retaliation.
[01:20:44.120 --> 01:20:48.560]  Certainly should get another bar grievance, another judicial conduct
[01:20:48.560 --> 01:20:53.440]  complaint, but they should get criminal accusations. They're not used to that.
[01:20:53.440 --> 01:20:58.880]  A Bushwack judge Bob Perkins in his court with criminal complaints against all
[01:20:58.880 --> 01:21:04.240]  15 of the highest judges in Texas court of criminal appeals and he said well
[01:21:04.240 --> 01:21:09.880]  Mr. Kelton you know that I'm a district judge and district judges in Travis
[01:21:09.880 --> 01:21:14.760]  County don't take criminal complaints. He said when I was a JP I took criminal
[01:21:14.760 --> 01:21:18.000]  complaints. I said oh oh judge I'm not here to invoke your duty as a district
[01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:23.400]  judge. I'm here to invoke your duty as a magistrate and that's a duty from which
[01:21:23.400 --> 01:21:29.360]  you may not yield yourself. Bob Perkins was really a nice guy.
[01:21:29.360 --> 01:21:34.120]  I like this guy. He sat back at his chair he looked at me and I know what he was
[01:21:34.120 --> 01:21:40.160]  thinking. Could I get away with it if I had my bailiff shoot this character? And
[01:21:40.160 --> 01:21:43.480]  then he said that you know that I should take this to the sheriff and I said I
[01:21:43.480 --> 01:21:57.400]  did. I filed a shielding from prosecution and he threw it in the trash and he said
[01:21:57.400 --> 01:22:03.160]  boy you should appeal for a rid of mandamus. Don't ask me to appeal. You go
[01:22:03.160 --> 01:22:08.840]  before a corrupt render a bogus decision and everybody says oh that's okay. You
[01:22:08.840 --> 01:22:12.320]  can go to it before a whole panel. You can appeal before a whole panel of corrupt
[01:22:12.320 --> 01:22:16.880]  judges and they'll really screw your royal. He kind of laughed and said well
[01:22:16.880 --> 01:22:21.000]  Mr. Kelton I don't think it's quite that bad. I said that's not because you're
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:27.360]  not pro se. I've got a better idea. I'll appeal to a grand jury. He said boy
[01:22:27.360 --> 01:22:31.680]  Mr. Kelton you can't appeal to a grand jury. Sure I can. I could appeal to a
[01:22:31.680 --> 01:22:36.120]  grand jury to indict the sheriff for felony shielding for prosecution
[01:22:36.120 --> 01:22:45.840]  violation 3805 middle code. Oh yeah. You can appeal to the higher court so you can
[01:22:45.840 --> 01:22:52.800]  appeal to a grand jury and here's their problem. The district court that impaneled
[01:22:52.800 --> 01:23:01.280]  a grand jury had a venue restriction. We used to have circuit judges that roamed
[01:23:01.280 --> 01:23:06.480]  all over the state. So a district judge is a state judge and he has statewide
[01:23:06.480 --> 01:23:13.080]  jurisdiction but as we got more judges we didn't need the circuit judges anymore
[01:23:13.080 --> 01:23:24.240]  so now we have judges in just about every venue so they set a venue restriction
[01:23:24.240 --> 01:23:35.680]  on each one of these judges. Well the judge impanels the grand jury and the
[01:23:35.680 --> 01:23:44.040]  grand jury is a state grand jury. I find nothing in code that similarly restricts
[01:23:44.040 --> 01:23:51.800]  the venue of a grand jury to that of the judge. Granted there's a grand jury
[01:23:51.800 --> 01:23:58.000]  impaneled in every county but there's nothing that says their jurisdiction is
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:06.320]  limited to anything other than the boundaries of the state. The implication you
[01:24:06.320 --> 01:24:15.680]  got about 254 grand juries. I can't find anything to restrict me from going from
[01:24:15.680 --> 01:24:22.200]  one to the other. I filed a criminal complaint, a set of criminal complaints
[01:24:22.200 --> 01:24:27.200]  against the district attorney in Dallas County with the grand jury in Tarrant
[01:24:27.200 --> 01:24:33.480]  County and I got a letter back from the foreman saying that we examined into
[01:24:33.480 --> 01:24:47.360]  your complaint and find no Tarrant County offenses. Say what? So who told him that?
[01:24:47.360 --> 01:24:56.200]  My response is criminal charges against the foreman for failing to act in
[01:24:56.200 --> 01:25:03.200]  accordance with 20.09. The grand jury shall investigate into all crime subject
[01:25:03.200 --> 01:25:06.560]  to indictment to come to their knowledge by way of any member of the grand jury,
[01:25:06.560 --> 01:25:13.840]  the prosecuting attorney or any other credible person. Mr. Renfrow have you
[01:25:13.840 --> 01:25:24.440]  ever been convicted of a felony? Nope. Are you over 18? Yes. You are a credible
[01:25:24.440 --> 01:25:31.960]  person by statutory definition. When a prosecuting attorney is given notice that
[01:25:31.960 --> 01:25:39.080]  a crime has been committed by a credible person, his duty is clear and
[01:25:39.080 --> 01:25:49.000]  statutory. He must give it to the grand jury. So a magistrate, every judge is a
[01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:56.520]  magistrate. When you take a criminal accusation to a magistrate, he has a
[01:25:56.520 --> 01:26:03.040]  duty to hold an examining trial and if fails to perform that duty, then you get
[01:26:03.040 --> 01:26:13.240]  filed against the judge. And as you move up the food chain, these guys become far
[01:26:13.240 --> 01:26:20.440]  more sensitive. These complaints are filed against the Texas Court of Criminal
[01:26:20.440 --> 01:26:28.920]  Appeals. I didn't get him indicted and it took me a year to get it before the
[01:26:28.920 --> 01:26:35.160]  grand jury and I thought that that was because of all of my eloquent auditory
[01:26:35.160 --> 01:26:40.440]  and all the pressure I put on him. I had nothing to do with any of that. Nobody
[01:26:40.440 --> 01:26:47.320]  was afraid of me. What it had to do with was a 25-year district attorney,
[01:26:47.320 --> 01:26:55.160]  Ronald, who was retiring, the Democrat, 15 judges on the Court of Criminal
[01:26:55.160 --> 01:27:03.800]  Appeals, all Republicans. It's all political at the end of the day and the
[01:27:03.800 --> 01:27:09.640]  higher up the food chain you go, the more sensitive they get to politics. That
[01:27:09.640 --> 01:27:13.720]  was all about a habeas corpus I filed for this kid in Conroe that had listened to
[01:27:13.720 --> 01:27:19.200]  the Republic of Texas and he stuck in jail. I filed it with Court of Criminal
[01:27:19.200 --> 01:27:23.560]  Appeals. They demand a motion for leave to file. I said, pack with you. It's a
[01:27:23.560 --> 01:27:28.800]  great writ, writ of right. You have no power to grant or deny leave. Well, they
[01:27:28.800 --> 01:27:33.360]  refused to take it without the motion. I filed a motion. They denied it. Really
[01:27:33.360 --> 01:27:39.400]  technical. That's what I went to the grand jury with. They got it on their
[01:27:39.400 --> 01:27:43.480]  first day in office and held it to their last day in office and no billed. I
[01:27:43.480 --> 01:27:49.240]  didn't get an indictment. But if you file a habeas corpus with Court of
[01:27:49.240 --> 01:27:54.720]  Criminal Appeals today, you're not going to get any of this motion for leave to
[01:27:54.720 --> 01:28:02.920]  file garbage. It's all political. And what you will do by going up this food
[01:28:02.920 --> 01:28:09.160]  chain, if you will give these guys, their political opponents, cannon fodder to
[01:28:09.160 --> 01:28:16.960]  use against them. And the best one to pick on is the one who's essentially
[01:28:16.960 --> 01:28:22.240]  innocent. When you kick the district judge with a judicial
[01:28:22.240 --> 01:28:28.000]  conduct complaint and criminal accusations against him, he is not going
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:35.640]  to be a haptic emperor. He can't say a word to you because it would be the same
[01:28:35.640 --> 01:28:41.880]  thing that you're charging this municipal judge with. So the only one he can
[01:28:41.880 --> 01:28:48.200]  chew out is this municipal judge and low-level attorney that got him in
[01:28:48.200 --> 01:28:55.600]  this mess to start with. Does that make sense, Rick? Yes. There is only one
[01:28:55.600 --> 01:29:06.920]  warning I have to give you. This can become too much fun. If anybody says
[01:29:06.920 --> 01:29:13.800]  anything to you, like, oh wow, you got to be careful, you can get in a lot of
[01:29:13.800 --> 01:29:21.480]  trouble 9-1-1. Witness tampering, destruction of justice. Go ahead, mess
[01:29:21.480 --> 01:29:29.640]  with me, Bubba. Once you start filing, you become poison. That's my story and I'm
[01:29:29.640 --> 01:29:35.400]  sticking to it. Hang on, about to go to break. Randy Kelsen, Deborah Stevens,
[01:29:35.400 --> 01:29:41.200]  Rue de la Radio, a call-in number 512-646-1984. Bear it, I see you there.
[01:29:41.200 --> 01:29:56.440]  We'll get to you. We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.440 --> 01:30:07.200]  Is it iPhone or i-spy? In Germany, one man had to file a lawsuit to learn how
[01:30:07.200 --> 01:30:12.680]  his cell phone carrier was tracking his every move 24-7. Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[01:30:12.680 --> 01:30:17.920]  and I'll have the creepy details in a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you
[01:30:17.920 --> 01:30:21.760]  give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again and once your
[01:30:21.760 --> 01:30:26.400]  privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So
[01:30:26.400 --> 01:30:30.680]  protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to
[01:30:30.680 --> 01:30:35.520]  yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by
[01:30:35.520 --> 01:30:40.680]  StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:40.680 --> 01:30:47.280]  Start over with StartPage. Do you know how much data your cell phone company
[01:30:47.280 --> 01:30:52.040]  collects on you? In Germany, Green Party politician Malta Spitz didn't, so he
[01:30:52.040 --> 01:30:57.240]  asked. When his carrier objected, he sued. Tracking people's whereabouts is what
[01:30:57.240 --> 01:31:01.040]  phone companies do. To route calls efficiently, they ping customers'
[01:31:01.040 --> 01:31:05.520]  cell phones every few seconds. But when a court ordered Deutsche Telekom to cough
[01:31:05.520 --> 01:31:10.520]  up its records on Spitz, what he learned was shocking. In a six-month period, the
[01:31:10.520 --> 01:31:15.740]  company had logged his location 35,000 times, often to within a few hundred
[01:31:15.740 --> 01:31:20.160]  yards of his precise location. So the next time you turn on your cell phone,
[01:31:20.160 --> 01:31:25.320]  know this. Your carrier is not only watching, it's taking notes. I'm Dr.
[01:31:25.320 --> 01:31:31.880]  Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. I lost
[01:31:31.880 --> 01:31:37.120]  my son. My uncle. My uncle. My son. On September 11th, 2001. Most people don't know
[01:31:37.120 --> 01:31:41.940]  that a third tower fell on September 11th. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story
[01:31:41.940 --> 01:31:45.920]  skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. Although the official explanation is that
[01:31:45.920 --> 01:31:50.800]  fire brought down building 7, over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked
[01:31:50.800 --> 01:31:54.880]  into the evidence and believed there is more to the story. Bring justice to my son.
[01:31:54.880 --> 01:32:00.400]  My uncle. My nephew. My son. Go to buildingwhats.org. Why it fell? Why it matters.
[01:32:00.400 --> 01:32:04.280]  That's what you can do. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did
[01:32:04.280 --> 01:32:07.840]  your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all
[01:32:07.840 --> 01:32:11.200]  know the government caused it with their chemtrails. But good luck getting them to
[01:32:11.200 --> 01:32:14.960]  pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails. I'm serious about your
[01:32:14.960 --> 01:32:18.680]  roof. That's why you have insurance. And Hill Country Home Improvements can handle
[01:32:18.680 --> 01:32:22.520]  the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept
[01:32:22.520 --> 01:32:26.720]  Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero
[01:32:26.720 --> 01:32:30.520]  complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim
[01:32:30.520 --> 01:32:37.480]  and your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to
[01:32:37.480 --> 01:32:41.720]  hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off. And
[01:32:41.720 --> 01:32:45.560]  we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this
[01:32:45.560 --> 01:32:50.160]  programming. So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be
[01:32:50.160 --> 01:32:57.200]  locked in. That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.200 --> 01:33:00.480]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean, I actually be
[01:33:00.480 --> 01:33:20.880]  kidding about chemtrails. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:30.480 --> 01:33:45.560]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens, Rue of Law Radio, and we're
[01:33:45.560 --> 01:33:52.240]  talking to Rick in Texas. And just for yucks, Rick, I'm at call down there
[01:33:52.240 --> 01:34:01.160]  tomorrow. Give me a number and just have some fun with them. And invite the
[01:34:01.160 --> 01:34:07.240]  prosecutor on to the show and tell him that we're going to do a show on him.
[01:34:07.240 --> 01:34:15.360]  And we're likely to say some unflattering things, but before I do
[01:34:15.360 --> 01:34:20.800]  that, I have to give you opportunity to rebut. So I'd like to bring you on my
[01:34:20.800 --> 01:34:28.160]  show to rebut what we're going to say. I have had so much fun with that.
[01:34:28.160 --> 01:34:32.480]  You think I should call the assistant prosecutor and say that?
[01:34:32.480 --> 01:34:39.560]  No, I will. Oh, it won't do any good if you do, but it will if I do.
[01:34:39.560 --> 01:34:46.960]  Oh, shit, certainly. Right. And you might look at having David file these
[01:34:46.960 --> 01:34:52.880]  complaints that stood to you. That really makes him crazy.
[01:34:52.880 --> 01:34:59.160]  He's had too many dinners already. Pardon me? I haven't had that guy too many dinners
[01:34:59.160 --> 01:35:07.040]  already. Oh, well, if you look at him, he's had too many dinners. He's fine.
[01:35:07.040 --> 01:35:11.440]  That's for sure. I don't have a house to repay him. You know, it's like I just, I
[01:35:11.440 --> 01:35:17.280]  want to, I show up and support him and beat him about every time we're together.
[01:35:17.280 --> 01:35:24.880]  Well, if you get a third party in there, now they got a ringer. They got somebody
[01:35:24.880 --> 01:35:34.160]  they can't deal with. Now they're in a problem. So you might consider it.
[01:35:34.160 --> 01:35:38.880]  He said that. Yeah, David had said that. He mentioned that.
[01:35:38.880 --> 01:35:46.480]  Yeah. And David really enjoyed it. Yeah. Yeah, I gather that.
[01:35:46.480 --> 01:35:51.760]  One question. I may be getting ahead of myself. I really expect this to go, you
[01:35:51.760 --> 01:35:57.520]  know, they'll have me show up and all. So they'll have to provide me with an
[01:35:57.520 --> 01:36:01.760]  attorney. Shall remain pro se or take advantage of attorney?
[01:36:01.760 --> 01:36:12.080]  Yes. Dave pro se. Okay. Little attorney pro se story.
[01:36:12.080 --> 01:36:18.080]  I went to the secretary of state to get an app of steel. They wouldn't give me one.
[01:36:18.080 --> 01:36:23.440]  So I called 911. They sent the Capitol police out there and
[01:36:23.440 --> 01:36:27.840]  instead of taking my complaint, he threatened to arrest me.
[01:36:27.840 --> 01:36:32.400]  So I call 911 on him. And I'll watch the guys show up and
[01:36:32.400 --> 01:36:37.600]  the sergeant shows up and he wanted to talk to me and I told him I couldn't
[01:36:37.600 --> 01:36:41.440]  talk to him. Well, why not? I said, we're the bad guys.
[01:36:41.440 --> 01:36:45.200]  We're the bad guys. Yeah, you're the bad guys. I call the good guys. Austin police
[01:36:45.200 --> 01:36:48.240]  and they'll be here pretty soon. And when they get here, I'll make a full
[01:36:48.240 --> 01:36:52.480]  statement to them. But until they do, it'd be inappropriate
[01:36:52.480 --> 01:36:55.600]  for us to talk to one another because I'll be filing criminal charges against
[01:36:55.600 --> 01:37:00.480]  some of your officers. Well, he got real excited over that and
[01:37:00.480 --> 01:37:03.760]  ordered me out of the building. So I can't leave the building. Your cop over
[01:37:03.760 --> 01:37:07.840]  here said that if I left the building, he would arrest me.
[01:37:07.840 --> 01:37:12.560]  Well, I'll arrest you if you don't. So I left the building. I'm standing out
[01:37:12.560 --> 01:37:18.000]  front waiting for Austin PD. And this guy is trying to ask me questions.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:27.280]  And when I told him what part of I do not want to talk to you, do you not
[01:37:27.280 --> 01:37:31.520]  understand? He grabbed me, smashed me into a wall,
[01:37:31.520 --> 01:37:36.400]  cracked the tooth. They cuffed me, hauled me off to jail.
[01:37:36.400 --> 01:37:43.120]  Next day, they let me out without charge. I filed about 20 information requests
[01:37:43.120 --> 01:37:46.960]  and then all of a sudden they charged. I went to the FBI to file criminal charges
[01:37:46.960 --> 01:37:51.840]  and the FBI arrested me because they issued warrants.
[01:37:51.840 --> 01:37:58.160]  So I get called into court. Don't tell me why. I just go there
[01:37:58.160 --> 01:38:02.160]  to call me up the clerk and she said, are you rental accountant? I said yes I am.
[01:38:02.160 --> 01:38:05.600]  So I have some questions. I said no questions. But I have to ask you some
[01:38:05.600 --> 01:38:08.560]  questions where you can ask them. I'm not going to answer.
[01:38:08.560 --> 01:38:13.120]  She said, I think I need to get security. Yes, ma'am, you do.
[01:38:13.120 --> 01:38:18.240]  You need to get security. I'll be sitting right here. So she gets security.
[01:38:18.240 --> 01:38:23.360]  But apparently somebody warned him because when he got there he was extremely
[01:38:23.360 --> 01:38:27.760]  careful. He said, well, can we step outside? I said
[01:38:27.760 --> 01:38:31.120]  sure. We don't want to interrupt the proceedings. He said, what can I do for
[01:38:31.120 --> 01:38:36.160]  you, Mr. Galton? Well, I have a problem. I don't know if
[01:38:36.160 --> 01:38:41.440]  I need you to arrest the clerk for impersonating a judicial officer
[01:38:41.440 --> 01:38:45.600]  or to arrest the judge for official oppression.
[01:38:45.600 --> 01:38:50.160]  You need to go in there and find out which one I should charge.
[01:38:50.160 --> 01:38:54.160]  Not what he didn't see that coming. So he went in and he
[01:38:54.160 --> 01:39:00.400]  decided that the judge would see me. The judge calls me up and
[01:39:00.400 --> 01:39:07.280]  I told her that, said your honor, I have this summons that tells me to be here
[01:39:07.280 --> 01:39:10.400]  but it doesn't tell me why. You won't tell me what I'm doing here?
[01:39:10.400 --> 01:39:14.240]  Well, Mr. Galton, we needed to find out if you had an attorney.
[01:39:14.240 --> 01:39:18.640]  Standard thing in Austin to always order you to court to see if you have an
[01:39:18.640 --> 01:39:21.920]  attorney. And I said, well, your honor, I have
[01:39:21.920 --> 01:39:25.520]  28.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and it lists all those things you can
[01:39:25.520 --> 01:39:29.680]  order me into court for to see if I have an attorney. It's not one of
[01:39:29.680 --> 01:39:33.920]  them. Well, that got her pretty tense but
[01:39:33.920 --> 01:39:38.160]  she turned out to be Juan Earl's daughter, Elizabeth Earl.
[01:39:38.160 --> 01:39:42.160]  And I knew she would be real political so I kind of backed off.
[01:39:42.160 --> 01:39:45.840]  She said, well, Mr. Galton, we needed to know if you had counsel.
[01:39:45.840 --> 01:39:48.720]  I said, no, your honor, I don't have counsel. Or are you going to hire counsel?
[01:39:48.720 --> 01:39:52.160]  Nope. Would you like me to appoint counsel?
[01:39:52.160 --> 01:39:55.840]  Would you do whatever you want to? Well, Mr. Galton, I'm going to appoint your
[01:39:55.840 --> 01:39:58.240]  counsel. I said, well, if you do judge make sure you
[01:39:58.240 --> 01:40:02.240]  appoint somebody you really don't like. And she kind of laughed and said,
[01:40:02.240 --> 01:40:05.040]  well, we've got an attorney will you get the next one.
[01:40:05.040 --> 01:40:08.640]  Attorney comes, we go sit down and he starts this
[01:40:08.640 --> 01:40:12.720]  routine. This is how things are going to go and I let him run on a while and
[01:40:12.720 --> 01:40:16.800]  then I said, no, no, no, no, that's not how things are going to go.
[01:40:16.800 --> 01:40:19.920]  Well, Mr. Galton, just how are things going to go then? This is how they're
[01:40:19.920 --> 01:40:22.720]  going to go. You're going to go to that judge and ask
[01:40:22.720 --> 01:40:27.040]  that judge to remove you from this case. Now, I'm going to go to that judge and
[01:40:27.040 --> 01:40:31.040]  tell her don't you dare remove him from this case. He's my counsel of choice
[01:40:31.040 --> 01:40:34.720]  and he's under contract. And the lawyer said, well, Mr. Galton,
[01:40:34.720 --> 01:40:38.240]  I'm not under contract with you. I'm under contract with the state.
[01:40:38.240 --> 01:40:42.240]  Yes, you are, but I'm the intended third party beneficiary and I have standing
[01:40:42.240 --> 01:40:45.440]  under the contract. And the judge is going to remove you from
[01:40:45.440 --> 01:40:49.280]  the case and he said, yes, he would. And then I get this through the judge
[01:40:49.280 --> 01:40:53.520]  for interfering in the private contract.
[01:40:53.520 --> 01:40:58.240]  The look on that lawyer's face was priceless.
[01:40:58.240 --> 01:41:02.080]  He told me, if he told me once, he told me 20 times,
[01:41:02.080 --> 01:41:05.680]  Mr. Galton, you're going to get me disbarred.
[01:41:05.680 --> 01:41:09.280]  I told him I had motions before the court
[01:41:09.280 --> 01:41:17.120]  with 20 due process violations. You will adequately adjudicate every single one.
[01:41:17.120 --> 01:41:21.120]  You failed to adjudicate a single one on bar grievance.
[01:41:21.120 --> 01:41:24.960]  One bar grievance would have ended his ability to practice.
[01:41:24.960 --> 01:41:30.240]  She knew it and he knew I knew it. We're in court.
[01:41:30.240 --> 01:41:34.480]  They're all up at the bar, up at the bench. I'm outside the bar.
[01:41:34.480 --> 01:41:38.160]  My attorney came over to me and said the prosecutor said she knows who you are
[01:41:38.160 --> 01:41:41.280]  and if you start filing criminal charges, she'll charge you with tampering the
[01:41:41.280 --> 01:41:44.880]  government document. I looked over at her and said, she said that,
[01:41:44.880 --> 01:41:47.680]  did she? He said, yes, she did. Get her over here.
[01:41:47.680 --> 01:41:50.880]  I need her to verify these criminal affidavits and court is her duty under
[01:41:50.880 --> 01:41:56.160]  order of 2.06 code of criminal procedure. And I pointed at her, you, come here.
[01:41:56.160 --> 01:42:01.440]  I pulled out about 30. Handed them to my lawyer and he held up both
[01:42:01.440 --> 01:42:04.880]  hands with his palms out. I'm not going to take them. I'm not going to
[01:42:04.880 --> 01:42:08.160]  take them. You take them, you chicken!
[01:42:08.160 --> 01:42:13.360]  Did this in front of the judge. The judge calls a recess for lunch.
[01:42:13.360 --> 01:42:18.000]  Before I got my burrito, they dismissed.
[01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:27.760]  You understand what happened, Rick? Not entirely.
[01:42:27.760 --> 01:42:35.040]  He dismissed my case to protect my lawyer from me.
[01:42:35.040 --> 01:42:40.320]  He knew that if I bar grieved my lawyer,
[01:42:40.320 --> 01:42:44.560]  he'd get his malpractice insurance counsel. For first year of practice, one
[01:42:44.560 --> 01:42:50.320]  bar grievance, they will counsel. Two, oh yeah, 20 years of practice, they
[01:42:50.320 --> 01:42:55.360]  counsel. The judge dismissed the case. First lady,
[01:42:55.360 --> 01:42:59.840]  she wasn't there yesterday. You know, they handed off to someone else.
[01:42:59.840 --> 01:43:04.160]  That's the way it happens. He was, yeah, uh, baby just gave me a
[01:43:04.160 --> 01:43:05.920]  text. He's asking, like, where do we file the
[01:43:05.920 --> 01:43:10.720]  criminal complaint first? It just depends on who you want to jerk
[01:43:10.720 --> 01:43:14.720]  around. But think of this like a four-sided chess
[01:43:14.720 --> 01:43:19.200]  board. You sit at the table, your attorney's to your right,
[01:43:19.200 --> 01:43:22.320]  opposing counsel to your left, the judge is across from you.
[01:43:22.320 --> 01:43:26.160]  You have a relationship with your attorney. Your attorney has a relationship
[01:43:26.160 --> 01:43:30.160]  with opposing counsel and the judge. You're the odd man out.
[01:43:30.160 --> 01:43:34.000]  If you're going to win your case, you have to get into that relationship.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:37.280]  You got to get the judge and the other attorney
[01:43:37.280 --> 01:43:42.640]  to protect your lawyer from you. And this is easy. Hang on, ready to
[01:43:42.640 --> 01:43:46.720]  kill real low radio? We'll be right back.
[01:43:46.720 --> 01:43:50.800]  By the way, I did that too soon. This is a good time to go to
[01:43:50.800 --> 01:43:55.360]  Logos Radio Network and check out our gun giveaway and
[01:43:55.360 --> 01:44:00.000]  help us with this fund drive. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:03.200]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive
[01:44:03.200 --> 01:44:06.400]  hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the
[01:44:06.400 --> 01:44:09.440]  government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to
[01:44:09.440 --> 01:44:12.960]  pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about
[01:44:12.960 --> 01:44:16.560]  your roof. That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can
[01:44:16.560 --> 01:44:20.080]  handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:44:20.080 --> 01:44:23.920]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business
[01:44:23.920 --> 01:44:27.760]  Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:44:27.760 --> 01:44:31.120]  to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:44:31.120 --> 01:44:37.520]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:44:37.520 --> 01:44:40.480]  Mention the crypto show and get a hundred dollars off, and we'll donate
[01:44:40.480 --> 01:44:43.840]  another hundred dollars to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this
[01:44:43.840 --> 01:44:46.640]  programming. So if those out-of-town roofers come
[01:44:46.640 --> 01:44:53.680]  knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745 or
[01:44:53.680 --> 01:44:57.280]  hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof
[01:44:57.280 --> 01:45:01.120]  replacement. May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:45:01.120 --> 01:45:04.240]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.240 --> 01:45:07.520]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.520 --> 01:45:11.120]  The affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course
[01:45:11.120 --> 01:45:15.520]  that will show you how in 24 hours, debt by step.
[01:45:15.520 --> 01:45:19.200]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.200 --> 01:45:23.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.120 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:32.480]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[01:45:32.480 --> 01:45:36.480]  case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:36.480 --> 01:45:40.240]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and
[01:45:40.240 --> 01:45:45.600]  practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom,
[01:45:45.600 --> 01:45:49.680]  video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.680 --> 01:45:55.120]  prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:45:55.120 --> 01:46:05.600]  and click on the banner. Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:05.600 --> 01:46:19.520]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Rural Radio. Get a little excited on this.
[01:46:19.520 --> 01:46:25.680]  This is my favorite subject. Okay, who to file against.
[01:46:26.960 --> 01:46:32.160]  Since they have kicked this up to a county court issue,
[01:46:32.160 --> 01:46:39.520]  my suggestion is that you file a motion to dismiss and attach
[01:46:39.520 --> 01:46:42.560]  verified criminal affidavits to the motion to dismiss.
[01:46:47.120 --> 01:46:54.320]  Okay, then when the judge fails to hold an examining trial, which he absolutely will not,
[01:46:54.320 --> 01:47:02.720]  then you go to the district court and file against this judge. As I read the code,
[01:47:04.320 --> 01:47:13.840]  a examining trials, they're intended to be held immediately. So when you include this
[01:47:14.640 --> 01:47:20.160]  criminal complaint with the examining trial, you can argue that the examining trial,
[01:47:20.160 --> 01:47:27.200]  I'm sorry, when you include these complaints with a motion to dismiss, you can claim that the
[01:47:27.200 --> 01:47:34.160]  criminal complaints take precedent over the civil. So the examining trial should be heard first.
[01:47:34.720 --> 01:47:42.560]  So if the judge comes into court and doesn't hear, doesn't hold an examining trial on the
[01:47:42.560 --> 01:47:50.000]  complaints and just ignores them, then you file against it. You go to the district court, there's a
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:59.440]  cool statute that only applies to district courts. Chapter 52, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
[01:48:01.040 --> 01:48:09.360]  goes to a court of inquiry. A court of inquiry is like an examining trial,
[01:48:09.360 --> 01:48:20.240]  but when you petition a district, I'm sorry, it is intended to initiate an investigation of
[01:48:20.240 --> 01:48:27.600]  public officials and agencies. When you petition a district judge for an examining, for a court
[01:48:27.600 --> 01:48:34.400]  of inquiry, that judge cannot hold the court of inquiry. He must appoint another judge to
[01:48:34.400 --> 01:48:42.400]  hear it, to hold it. So you file a complaint with the district judge and request that he either hold
[01:48:42.400 --> 01:48:51.600]  an examining trial or initiate a court of inquiry. And when he doesn't do either one of them,
[01:48:52.320 --> 01:48:56.480]  then you go to the district attorney with criminal charges against the district judge.
[01:48:56.480 --> 01:49:03.680]  And that's when things are going to get real exciting around there. Because now you've got a
[01:49:03.680 --> 01:49:10.240]  district judge, he hadn't done anything here. He don't have anything to do with this. And now he's
[01:49:10.240 --> 01:49:17.440]  got some jack leg down here trying to get him indicted for trying to cover your guys' behinds.
[01:49:17.440 --> 01:49:26.000]  Rick, have you ever been in the military? No. Well, I didn't hear that.
[01:49:28.160 --> 01:49:36.320]  I'm sorry? Were you ever in the military? No, I was not. Okay. David was. He can explain this to
[01:49:36.320 --> 01:49:47.680]  you. It all rolls downhill. When I was on a military base, we were high level officers skier us,
[01:49:48.400 --> 01:49:52.240]  but there wasn't anything more dangerous to us than a civilian.
[01:49:54.160 --> 01:50:00.240]  Because a civilian could walk into the commander's office and crawl right down his throat.
[01:50:00.240 --> 01:50:07.280]  And when the civilian gets done with the commander, the commander's going to call the
[01:50:07.280 --> 01:50:13.680]  assistant commander and crawl down his throat because the citizen was crawling down the commander's
[01:50:13.680 --> 01:50:18.720]  throat. And that's going to walk all the way down to the bottom. And whoever you were complaining
[01:50:18.720 --> 01:50:25.600]  about, it doesn't make any difference. What happened doesn't make any difference if you're
[01:50:25.600 --> 01:50:34.640]  right, wrong, or what have you. They don't care. You're in big trouble. This is real similar.
[01:50:36.160 --> 01:50:40.000]  When you start going after the district judges, everybody gets excited.
[01:50:42.640 --> 01:50:48.640]  I was, we had a fire ban on and I was doing some plastic welding on a tank. And then we had a new
[01:50:48.640 --> 01:50:53.520]  cop. I live right next to City Hall. They had a new copping town. And I hear, sir, sir, and I turn
[01:50:53.520 --> 01:50:58.240]  around this cop I've never seen. He said, sir, you can't have that open plane. I got a little
[01:50:58.240 --> 01:51:02.560]  propane torch. I said, sure, Ken, look, nothing to it. No, no, no, you don't understand. We have a fire
[01:51:02.560 --> 01:51:08.320]  ban on. I said, he just quit me here. I run a fire department. I understand, sir, but you can't have
[01:51:08.320 --> 01:51:17.040]  that open plane. You're joking, right? You just asked me, oh, no, sir, wait a minute. That John
[01:51:17.040 --> 01:51:24.080]  Fosstell, the district judge, sent you down here to harass me, didn't he? Just because I filed one
[01:51:24.080 --> 01:51:30.080]  crummy little terroristic threat complaint against him with the attorney general, he sent you down
[01:51:30.080 --> 01:51:36.320]  here, didn't he? The cop turned white, stepped back, held up both hands with his palms out.
[01:51:37.200 --> 01:51:43.520]  One moment, sir, takes out his cell phone dials. About 30 seconds, the chief of police steps out the
[01:51:43.520 --> 01:51:49.120]  door of the city hall and hollered across there, Randy, what are you doing to my new officer?
[01:51:49.760 --> 01:51:59.040]  So, Tom, a husband just jerking his chain, and the cop said, oh, God, I saw my whole career pass
[01:51:59.040 --> 01:52:10.720]  before my eyes. Everybody's terrified of that district judge. Everybody but you. You can crawl
[01:52:10.720 --> 01:52:17.280]  down his throat like he's an errant stepchild, and there's nothing he can do to put up with it.
[01:52:17.840 --> 01:52:23.920]  But when you're done with him, he is going to have words for somebody. At the end of the day,
[01:52:23.920 --> 01:52:31.680]  it's all political. Does that make sense, Rick? Yes, it does. And I'm doing criminal complaints,
[01:52:31.680 --> 01:52:39.760]  and I can tell you, they want you to think it don't matter. Oh, it terrifies them.
[01:52:42.080 --> 01:52:49.040]  Favorite thing I ever done was set up a judge, and if they get the idea you're setting them up,
[01:52:49.040 --> 01:52:55.040]  that makes it even better. I got this rule, never ask a public official to do anything
[01:52:55.040 --> 01:53:01.360]  you actually want them to do. Because you never ask a public official to do anything,
[01:53:01.360 --> 01:53:05.360]  that the law does not command them to do so that when they don't do it, you can sting them.
[01:53:06.720 --> 01:53:09.680]  I'm in court with a friend of mine who's having a hearing. I stand at the bar.
[01:53:10.560 --> 01:53:13.680]  The judge finally looks up and said, can I help you? I said, yes, your honor, my name's
[01:53:13.680 --> 01:53:17.280]  Randy Kelton. I have a hearing deficiency. Well, Mr. Kelton, what's wrong with your
[01:53:17.280 --> 01:53:22.400]  hearings? Oh, judge, I was down in Mexico the other day, and I drank too much that cheap tequila,
[01:53:22.400 --> 01:53:27.600]  and I lost my hearing aid. Well, I was lying. I had it in my pocket. Well, Mr. Kelton, why are
[01:53:27.600 --> 01:53:32.880]  you telling me this? I said, do you have accommodation for the hearing impaired? No, I do not. You
[01:53:32.880 --> 01:53:37.520]  got a sound system here. Will you turn it up? No, I will not. Well, then will you speak up?
[01:53:38.400 --> 01:53:42.720]  And he did. Told the bailiff, but I didn't sit down and shut up. He said, throw me out of the
[01:53:42.720 --> 01:53:50.160]  courtroom. After my hearing, I got to the bar, and I told the bailiff, you come with me. We get
[01:53:50.160 --> 01:53:54.880]  outside, and he said, what can I do for you? I need you to arrest the judge. For class A,
[01:53:54.880 --> 01:53:59.040]  misdemeanor, official oppression, criminal violation, 3903 Penal Code, in that he failed
[01:53:59.040 --> 01:54:03.760]  to perform a duty he has required to perform. But in the process, denied me full and free access
[01:54:03.760 --> 01:54:09.120]  to enjoy my right. Well, Mr. Kelton, what right did he deny you in? He denied me in my right to
[01:54:09.120 --> 01:54:14.800]  accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The bailiff said, well, Mr. Kelton, why
[01:54:14.800 --> 01:54:20.720]  didn't you tell the judge about the Americans with Disabilities Act? Heck, if I'd have done that,
[01:54:20.720 --> 01:54:27.840]  he might have turned the sound up. The bailiff stood there a minute, and this grin started
[01:54:27.840 --> 01:54:36.000]  across his face. You set him up. Yeah, he was a sucker for that one, wasn't he? After that,
[01:54:37.120 --> 01:54:44.480]  I walk into a court in Tarrant County. I used to get bailiffs following me. Now they fall
[01:54:44.480 --> 01:54:52.160]  all over themselves trying to find another place to be. The word is, if that Kelton SOB comes in
[01:54:52.160 --> 01:55:02.480]  your court, he is setting you up. And that's right, I am. So don't screw with me. Once they
[01:55:02.480 --> 01:55:09.040]  figure it out, when you go in there and ask them to do something, they don't do it, and you don't
[01:55:09.040 --> 01:55:16.800]  get upset. They're always wondering, what has this guy got up his sleeve? And then, I never give
[01:55:16.800 --> 01:55:23.440]  fair warning. If you ever try to give fair warning, oh, these are my rights, you're supposed to do
[01:55:23.440 --> 01:55:29.920]  this, you're supposed to do that, they will always treat that as a threat. I never give fair warning.
[01:55:30.640 --> 01:55:35.520]  When the judge says, oh, you need to take this to the police department, oh, I thank you,
[01:55:35.520 --> 01:55:40.480]  your honor, for that sage advice. I go right out and go to the next judge and file against this one.
[01:55:42.080 --> 01:55:47.040]  You won't legal advice, Bubba, call the prosecution attorney. I'm not your lawyer.
[01:55:48.640 --> 01:55:52.080]  Bushwhack is always better, and it's a whole lot more fun.
[01:55:54.560 --> 01:55:56.800]  And from your history, you're going to like this.
[01:55:56.800 --> 01:56:07.760]  He thinks so. Oh, I know so. Criminal, people tend to wait on criminals. No, no, no, no.
[01:56:08.400 --> 01:56:13.360]  You should file criminal charges against them at the very first opportunity.
[01:56:15.040 --> 01:56:19.680]  You guys want to fight? I welcome you to the deep end of the pool.
[01:56:19.680 --> 01:56:29.120]  When you start bringing a threat against them, you know, they know that the prosecutor is going to
[01:56:29.120 --> 01:56:35.040]  try to protect them, and it's very unlikely that a grand jury will indict them. Okay,
[01:56:35.680 --> 01:56:38.240]  who here wants to play Russian roulette with their career?
[01:56:40.720 --> 01:56:46.480]  It's unlikely, but maybe there's some chump on that jury that hates judges.
[01:56:46.480 --> 01:56:51.760]  But had a judge screw him around in a divorce hearing or something,
[01:56:52.880 --> 01:56:59.760]  you never know what a grand jury's going to do. Scalia said that any prosecutor worthy salt
[01:56:59.760 --> 01:57:06.960]  can get a ham sandwich indicted. Well, maybe. The problem they have is trying to keep a ham
[01:57:06.960 --> 01:57:15.040]  sandwich from getting indicted. Good luck with that. So this is, it is incredibly powerful.
[01:57:15.040 --> 01:57:19.920]  We need people all over the state to do it. This will get our officials back in line.
[01:57:21.120 --> 01:57:26.080]  These guys actually consider retaliating against you in such a blatant way.
[01:57:29.760 --> 01:57:34.640]  Yeah, I thought the same thing actually. It was very clear to see.
[01:57:34.640 --> 01:57:45.200]  Yeah, these guys live in a box. They live in this box where everybody thinks their
[01:57:46.240 --> 01:57:52.480]  word is law and accept to do whatever they say. And they're used to bullying people around in
[01:57:52.480 --> 01:57:57.360]  these courts. And when they get somebody that runs all over them, it takes them out of their element.
[01:57:57.360 --> 01:58:06.640]  So they tend to do stupid things. They don't react and respond well. And for you, this is serious.
[01:58:06.640 --> 01:58:11.520]  Now they're trying to threaten your liberty. So this is getting real serious.
[01:58:14.640 --> 01:58:21.280]  So right. Have fun. If you've got any questions on this, get hold of David who gave me a number.
[01:58:22.560 --> 01:58:26.400]  I'll be glad to go over it. If you want me to follow the complaints, I would love to.
[01:58:26.400 --> 01:58:31.440]  I have great fun doing it. And I'm here, David will. And I'll call down there and just drive them
[01:58:31.440 --> 01:58:37.440]  nuts. This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, real live radio. We'll be back tomorrow night on our
[01:58:37.440 --> 01:58:42.880]  four hour info marathon. Thank you, Rick and Barrett. If you'll call back tomorrow, I will take
[01:58:42.880 --> 01:58:47.040]  you first. Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:47.040 --> 01:58:56.720]  Bible for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.720 --> 01:59:02.160]  recovery version. The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.160 --> 01:59:08.240]  what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.240 --> 01:59:16.640]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:16.640 --> 01:59:24.960]  Or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000
[01:59:24.960 --> 01:59:30.720]  cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is
[01:59:30.720 --> 01:59:35.840]  truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version,
[01:59:35.840 --> 01:59:49.040]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.040 --> 02:00:03.520]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at www.logosradionetwork.com.