ROL_2017-02-09_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.600]  The following flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:05.600 --> 00:11.920]  Markets for Monday the 6th of February 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,232.54
[00:11.920 --> 00:19.400]  an ounce, silver $17.70 an ounce, Texas crude $53.54 a barrel, and Bitcoin is rising at
[00:19.400 --> 00:23.760]  $1,025 U.S. currency.
[00:23.760 --> 00:29.620]  Today in history, the year 1976 and as testimony before the United States Senate subcommittee
[00:29.620 --> 00:34.240]  Lockheed corporate president Carl Kachin admits that the company had paid out approximately
[00:34.240 --> 00:39.800]  $3 million in bribes to the office of the Japanese Prime Minister Kikoi Tanaka.
[00:39.800 --> 00:46.700]  Today in history, in recent news, Israel's parliament passed a law, 60 to 52, Monday
[00:46.700 --> 00:51.360]  today that would retroactively legalize 16 Jewish settlements, several thousand housing
[00:51.360 --> 00:54.320]  units on 2,000 acres of Palestinian land.
[00:54.320 --> 00:59.120]  Anat Ben-Noon, the director of external relations for peace now, addressing the private land
[00:59.120 --> 01:03.920]  grab authorized in the new law, said is, quote, deteriorating Israel's democracy, making
[01:03.920 --> 01:09.000]  stealing an official policy and bringing us one step closer to annexation.
[01:09.000 --> 01:13.680]  Israel's attorney general Abba Kai Mandelblit had described the bill as unconstitutional
[01:13.680 --> 01:18.080]  and a breach of international law, stating he would not defend it in the higher court,
[01:18.080 --> 01:20.000]  which will most likely nullify it.
[01:20.000 --> 01:24.240]  The heart of the issue being that since Palestinians in the West Bank are not Israeli citizens
[01:24.240 --> 01:28.620]  and cannot vote for candidates in Israel's parliament, Palestinian property rights advocates
[01:28.620 --> 01:32.360]  are criticizing the legislation because of its anti-democratic nature.
[01:32.360 --> 01:36.160]  Under the law, Palestinian landowners would be offered a form of compensation for the
[01:36.160 --> 01:39.600]  long term use of their property, but would not be able to reclaim it.
[01:39.600 --> 01:44.000]  A meeting between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are set
[01:44.000 --> 01:48.860]  to be scheduled on February 15th in Washington, D.C., and should give us a more clear position
[01:48.860 --> 01:55.360]  of the current White House stance on such retroactive actions by Israel.
[01:55.360 --> 01:59.760]  After many years of investigation, the Australian Royal Commission into institutional responses
[01:59.760 --> 02:05.640]  to child sexual abuse has uncovered that between 1950 and 2015, at least 7 percent of Australian
[02:05.640 --> 02:10.120]  Catholic priests and over 40 percent of brothers in some orders were accused of sexually abusing
[02:10.120 --> 02:11.120]  children.
[02:11.120 --> 02:15.480]  Senior counsel Gail Furness, while delivering the findings on Monday today, stated that
[02:15.480 --> 02:18.760]  the victims' accounts were, quote, harrowing.
[02:18.760 --> 02:21.560]  The accounts were depressingly familiar, she said.
[02:21.560 --> 02:25.240]  Children who came forward were ignored or worse punished.
[02:25.240 --> 02:26.240]  Documents were not investigated.
[02:26.240 --> 02:30.480]  Priests who had been accused of abuse were moved to other communities that knew nothing
[02:30.480 --> 02:32.080]  of their past.
[02:32.080 --> 02:34.440]  Documents were not kept or they were destroyed.
[02:34.440 --> 02:38.800]  Of the alleged perpetrators, 32 percent were religious brothers, 30 percent were priests,
[02:38.800 --> 02:42.440]  29 percent were laypeople, and 5 percent were religious sisters.
[02:42.440 --> 02:47.280]  The average age of victims at the time of abuse was 10 and a half for girls and around
[02:47.280 --> 02:49.120]  11 and a half for boys.
[02:49.120 --> 02:53.400]  May God heal, strengthen, and bring peace to all those affected by these despicable
[02:53.400 --> 02:55.400]  crimes.
[03:53.400 --> 04:16.520]  OK, howdy, howdy, this is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio on this, the Thursday,
[04:16.520 --> 04:23.920]  the 9th day of February 2017 already.
[04:23.920 --> 04:32.040]  OK, tonight I'm going to start out with kind of some updates on what has been going on.
[04:32.040 --> 04:34.840]  We've got several people.
[04:34.840 --> 04:40.520]  Tomorrow night I will have an audio from North Carolina.
[04:40.520 --> 04:44.240]  We've got Art Patton in North Carolina.
[04:44.240 --> 04:50.400]  I went out there a couple of times and did a couple of seminars out there and helped
[04:50.400 --> 04:58.320]  him with some issues with his prosecuting attorney and Art has really been active.
[04:58.320 --> 05:03.760]  He's been one of the people that's actually got out there and done things.
[05:03.760 --> 05:09.640]  One of the favorite things I've ever heard anybody do, Art did this one, he went to court
[05:09.640 --> 05:14.600]  and there were, he said there were about 350 people in the courtroom, or it turned out
[05:14.600 --> 05:24.080]  there were actually 359 in the courtroom according to the safety placard was only designed to
[05:24.080 --> 05:27.560]  hold something like 117 people.
[05:27.560 --> 05:34.840]  He said people were standing along the walls and sitting in the floor and this was a traffic
[05:34.840 --> 05:45.760]  issue where they're calling in people for one of these supposed conferences, the arraignment
[05:45.760 --> 05:52.440]  hearing where it's actually for a conference with the prosecutor and Art was annoyed by
[05:52.440 --> 06:00.280]  all of this and trying to figure out what he could do about it and he got this brainstorm.
[06:00.280 --> 06:03.040]  He went out and called the fire marshal.
[06:03.040 --> 06:10.000]  The fire marshal came in and evacuated the whole courtroom, oh that was a hoot, but he
[06:10.000 --> 06:19.880]  also sent some people to the grand jury, but they couldn't get to the grand jury and he
[06:19.880 --> 06:28.000]  had talked to me and talked on the air and I talked to him about how to approach that
[06:28.000 --> 06:37.080]  and cautioned him to make sure that when he went to the grand jury that he record it and
[06:37.080 --> 06:42.440]  he said well they won't let you record, so they only won't let you record if they know
[06:42.440 --> 06:47.280]  about it, so take two recorders and those who've listened to the show a lot know that
[06:47.280 --> 06:52.520]  I recommend people take two recorders and one you take out and put it right in front
[06:52.520 --> 06:55.640]  of them and when they tell you to turn it off, you turn it off.
[06:55.640 --> 07:00.400]  They don't tell them about the other, so that's what they did.
[07:00.400 --> 07:06.400]  They each had two, there were two guys, they each had two recorders, they took them out,
[07:06.400 --> 07:13.560]  the prosecutor insisted they shut them off, they were going, they had already sent complaints
[07:13.560 --> 07:18.840]  to the grand jury by mail and the prosecutor intercepted them and called them and told
[07:18.840 --> 07:22.960]  them they couldn't do that and they went down to have this meeting.
[07:22.960 --> 07:28.880]  Tomorrow night we will, if the audio is good enough, he's sending me an audio of what
[07:28.880 --> 07:35.920]  actually went on in this meeting where the prosecutor threatened both of them with prosecution
[07:35.920 --> 07:39.800]  if they tried to file a complaint with the grand jury again.
[07:39.800 --> 07:47.600]  He called me and told me about it and I called the prosecutor and told him that I do this
[07:47.600 --> 07:54.520]  show in Texas on legal reform and I had this audio that I was going to play on the air
[07:54.520 --> 08:01.280]  of him threatening some people for trying to present complaints to the grand jury and
[08:01.280 --> 08:11.040]  it was inappropriate for me to say something on the air that might be construed derogatory
[08:11.040 --> 08:17.400]  to him, to his professional position.
[08:17.400 --> 08:20.600]  Without giving him opportunity to rebut.
[08:20.600 --> 08:25.880]  So I'd like to invite you onto my show and said Friday night's great because we do a
[08:25.880 --> 08:31.880]  four hour show and he kind of stuttered and stammered and said he'd check his schedule.
[08:31.880 --> 08:34.200]  Well he never got back to me.
[08:34.200 --> 08:37.120]  Two weeks later he resigned.
[08:37.120 --> 08:44.640]  So I don't know if what we were doing to him is what got him to resign, but I certainly
[08:44.640 --> 08:47.680]  like to think it is.
[08:47.680 --> 08:50.840]  Hello by the way, I do have the phone lines on.
[08:50.840 --> 08:59.760]  Our call in number is 512-646-1984 and we have our fundraiser on so go to Logos Radio
[08:59.760 --> 09:02.160]  Network and have a look at the gun giveaway.
[09:02.160 --> 09:11.480]  We're giving away an AR-15, a complete AR-15 this year and I also have my ebook up for
[09:11.480 --> 09:20.960]  sale, it's for sale in review, if anybody gets it I'm hoping that they will critique
[09:20.960 --> 09:28.120]  it, everything that doesn't sound right doesn't make sense, anywhere you have to read something
[09:28.120 --> 09:34.560]  twice I need to know about it so I can fix it and if I have some blunders in there which
[09:34.560 --> 09:42.200]  I'm sure I do in some places, it turned out to be a pretty large project.
[09:42.200 --> 09:52.160]  But I do go through the things that I've learned about how to deal with the system over these
[09:52.160 --> 09:58.920]  last 30 years and it's not the way you learned in high school.
[09:58.920 --> 10:06.120]  You can mostly forget about all that nonsense because what they told you about how the system
[10:06.120 --> 10:10.760]  works simply was not true.
[10:10.760 --> 10:19.520]  The system does not work the way the system wants us to think it does.
[10:19.520 --> 10:29.040]  What's important in a legal setting is not what your civics class teacher told you was
[10:29.040 --> 10:34.280]  important, they talked about the right of things and the rule of law and how this is
[10:34.280 --> 10:41.400]  a country of law and you can expect to go to the court and have a proper adjudication
[10:41.400 --> 10:45.880]  of your case before a fair and honest jurist.
[10:45.880 --> 11:02.000]  That is hogwash and through the eBook we deliver a set of ways of thinking about the system.
[11:02.000 --> 11:10.520]  I try to explain why I structure these the way I do but it's not necessary that you understand
[11:10.520 --> 11:15.760]  why we structure these the way they're structured.
[11:15.760 --> 11:25.440]  If you do what we suggest, if you approach the system from the perspective that is presented
[11:25.440 --> 11:35.000]  in the eBook, especially in the first sections on the legal fallacies, you will come to the
[11:35.000 --> 11:43.280]  system from a perspective that will allow you to begin to achieve justice.
[11:43.280 --> 11:49.000]  It's primarily because it's not about laws, it's about politics and most of the structures
[11:49.000 --> 11:59.160]  I presented there are about how to approach the courts from a political perspective.
[11:59.160 --> 12:06.120]  Now I know it sounds horrible when I say that you can expect the court, the judge to rule
[12:06.120 --> 12:12.280]  against you out of hand at every turn and if the courts are absolutely corrupt, they're
[12:12.280 --> 12:13.920]  bought and paid for.
[12:13.920 --> 12:22.000]  That sounds horrible but they may not be bought and paid for but you need to go to the court
[12:22.000 --> 12:24.720]  from that perspective.
[12:24.720 --> 12:28.140]  When you go to the court from the perspective that they're going to rule against you out
[12:28.140 --> 12:36.760]  of hand at every turn, you get over this notion that you're going to receive fairness because
[12:36.760 --> 12:41.880]  they don't know what is fair, it's subjective.
[12:41.880 --> 12:46.560]  What's fair to me or what seems fair to me is probably not the same thing that seems
[12:46.560 --> 12:51.400]  fair to you, especially if we're at odds with between each other.
[12:51.400 --> 12:56.680]  So for the most part, most parties come away feeling like they've been poorly treated.
[12:56.680 --> 13:04.440]  But if, A, you come across a much more pronounced feeling of being mistreated.
[13:04.440 --> 13:14.240]  So we try to help people orient the way they hold their mind when they come to the court.
[13:14.240 --> 13:20.440]  And quoted from Dr. Frederick Graves, your only purpose in the trial court is to set
[13:20.440 --> 13:23.200]  the record for appeal.
[13:23.200 --> 13:27.080]  Forget about the judge, you don't care what he rules.
[13:27.080 --> 13:29.120]  Everything he rules, you object to.
[13:29.120 --> 13:36.560]  Including the prosecutor or the opposing side says you object to it, these are objections
[13:36.560 --> 13:37.560]  on the record.
[13:37.560 --> 13:39.720]  You're just setting the record.
[13:39.720 --> 13:44.160]  And when you go to the judge, the only thing the judge is there to do is determine the
[13:44.160 --> 13:49.120]  facts in accordance with the rules of evidence and apply the law as it comes to him to the
[13:49.120 --> 13:50.320]  facts in the case.
[13:50.320 --> 13:52.320]  That's it.
[13:52.320 --> 13:56.200]  If he tries to do anything else, he is out of line.
[13:56.200 --> 14:04.640]  I know a lot of people have complained about how the judges are rude and disrespectful.
[14:04.640 --> 14:07.560]  Judge gets rude and disrespectful with me.
[14:07.560 --> 14:14.400]  I take that as a threat and I'm either leaving the courtroom or depending on how disrespectful
[14:14.400 --> 14:18.400]  he is, I take out my phone and dial 911.
[14:18.400 --> 14:25.960]  This is the other thing we try to convince people of, we try to get you to understand.
[14:25.960 --> 14:29.640]  All of these guys are public servants.
[14:29.640 --> 14:33.680]  They're the servants, you're the master.
[14:33.680 --> 14:34.800]  They forget that.
[14:34.800 --> 14:39.040]  They think they become the masters because you come into their building.
[14:39.040 --> 14:41.800]  Well, it's not really that way.
[14:41.800 --> 14:47.760]  And that's why I call 911 at the drop of a hat, of a hat.
[14:47.760 --> 14:52.120]  And they're partly because I consider myself the master of my servants.
[14:52.120 --> 14:56.480]  But secondly, it works.
[14:56.480 --> 15:02.160]  You want to really get their attention, you dial 911, ask them to send somebody out to
[15:02.160 --> 15:05.480]  arrest them.
[15:05.480 --> 15:08.600]  It adjusts their perspective really quick.
[15:08.600 --> 15:15.640]  Even the judge, when the judge gets loud mouthed and rude, then you dial 911.
[15:15.640 --> 15:17.680]  You don't threaten him.
[15:17.680 --> 15:20.880]  You don't give legal advice.
[15:20.880 --> 15:25.520]  You do not give fair warning, just call 911.
[15:25.520 --> 15:34.080]  I have never had a judge threaten me with contempt of court for calling 911 in the courtroom
[15:34.080 --> 15:39.320]  or asking the bailiff to drag judge off the bench to arrest him.
[15:39.320 --> 15:46.200]  He knows, and he knows that I know, two words out of him while I'm making criminal accusations
[15:46.200 --> 15:51.400]  against him, that gets really, really serious, really, really fast.
[15:51.400 --> 15:59.200]  And when I come back, I'll also talk about my candle, the water bottle guy.
[15:59.200 --> 16:01.840]  Yeah, he's still after him.
[16:01.840 --> 16:04.200]  He's not done yet.
[16:04.200 --> 16:08.200]  He just sent a letter to the grand jury in Travis County.
[16:08.200 --> 16:13.760]  And when we come back on the other side, I'll talk to you about what happened with that
[16:13.760 --> 16:21.320]  letter and what Mike and I are planning to do as a result of it to demonstrate to these
[16:21.320 --> 16:22.320]  guys.
[16:22.320 --> 16:24.800]  They are the servants.
[16:24.800 --> 16:27.120]  We are the masters.
[16:27.120 --> 16:33.960]  They follow our law or we use the law to give them reason to change their behavior.
[16:33.960 --> 16:37.720]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[16:37.720 --> 16:41.800]  I call it number 512-606-1984.
[16:41.800 --> 16:48.080]  I don't see any calls on the boards, and I think I have the phone lines turned on.
[16:48.080 --> 16:52.120]  So if you have a question or a comment, give us a call, we'll be taking your calls all
[16:52.120 --> 16:53.120]  night.
[16:53.120 --> 17:22.360]  We'll be right back.
[17:22.360 --> 17:26.840]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:26.840 --> 17:33.040]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:33.040 --> 17:34.520]  Bye bye, yucky cookies.
[17:34.520 --> 17:40.760]  Now, I go to logosradio.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand side,
[17:40.760 --> 17:46.240]  bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy
[17:46.240 --> 17:47.240]  new cookies.
[17:47.240 --> 17:48.640]  New cookies for me?
[17:48.640 --> 17:53.720]  Consider it an early Christmas present, and every time I order on Amazon, I go through
[17:53.720 --> 17:57.200]  this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[17:57.200 --> 17:58.200]  B is for cookie.
[17:58.200 --> 17:59.200]  B is for classified.
[17:59.200 --> 18:05.200]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.200 --> 18:09.360]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.360 --> 18:13.680]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.680 --> 18:14.680]  can win too.
[18:14.680 --> 18:19.600]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.600 --> 18:24.920]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:24.920 --> 18:29.440]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[18:29.440 --> 18:34.080]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.080 --> 18:39.200]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.200 --> 18:41.320]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.320 --> 18:46.880]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.880 --> 18:49.880]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.880 --> 18:58.880]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[18:58.880 --> 18:59.880]  collectors now.
[18:59.880 --> 19:22.520]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, lo-lo-logosradio-network.com.
[19:22.520 --> 19:42.960]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[19:42.960 --> 19:50.720]  So at least consider that e-book, we're selling for $100 and if you purchase the e-book, you
[19:50.720 --> 19:59.520]  get four chances in the gun giveaway, but if you do get it, critique it for me.
[19:59.520 --> 20:03.600]  We're trying to develop this as a manual.
[20:03.600 --> 20:12.000]  If we are to take the system back, we will do it at this grassroots level.
[20:12.000 --> 20:22.160]  It has been for some 30 years my intended purpose to place every judge in the country
[20:22.160 --> 20:29.680]  in a position such that when he steps out, steps up behind the bench and looks out across
[20:29.680 --> 20:35.480]  the bar at the gallery, I want the judge wondering which one, which one of those scoundrels out
[20:35.480 --> 20:40.160]  there are waiting for me to render a ruling so he can run down to the grand jury and try
[20:40.160 --> 20:42.720]  to keep me indicted.
[20:42.720 --> 20:48.240]  In this case with Mike Handel, he's been fighting Travis County for a long time and they've
[20:48.240 --> 20:53.760]  pulled every stinkin' rotten low down dirty trick they could come up with and he's called
[20:53.760 --> 20:56.240]  them on it every time.
[20:56.240 --> 21:00.720]  He just finally started sending in criminal complaints and he sent some criminal complaints
[21:00.720 --> 21:08.080]  to the district attorney, I mean to the grand jury addressed to the courthouse.
[21:08.080 --> 21:15.200]  Well the court clerk got those, opened them, sent them back to him.
[21:15.200 --> 21:18.000]  Well that's interesting.
[21:18.000 --> 21:24.160]  The Article 2.03 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure tells a prosecuting attorney when he's made
[21:24.160 --> 21:31.240]  known in any manner that a public official has violated the law relating to their office
[21:31.240 --> 21:35.400]  and shall reduce the complaint to an information submitted to the grand jury.
[21:35.400 --> 21:43.760]  No discretion of any kind in the matter of a complaint against a public official.
[21:43.760 --> 21:54.320]  17.30 Code of Criminal Procedure tells the magistrate that after an examining trial he
[21:54.320 --> 21:59.520]  is to seal all documents had in the hearing, cause his name to be written across the seal
[21:59.520 --> 22:04.600]  of the envelope and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.
[22:04.600 --> 22:16.000]  17.31 says that the clerk shall keep all these documents safe and deliver them up to the
[22:16.000 --> 22:19.200]  next grand jury.
[22:19.200 --> 22:28.040]  So my assertion is that when the clerk receives these complaints it doesn't matter if it
[22:28.040 --> 22:32.160]  comes from a magistrate or a private citizen.
[22:32.160 --> 22:38.120]  She's to keep those documents safe and deliver them up to the next grand jury.
[22:38.120 --> 22:49.120]  There is nothing in law that grants a clerk the authority to hold an examining trial.
[22:49.120 --> 22:53.600]  And that appears to be what she did.
[22:53.600 --> 23:03.800]  Public officials sometimes forget the difference between public officials and private citizens.
[23:03.800 --> 23:08.480]  Citizens are the masters, officials are the servants.
[23:08.480 --> 23:19.120]  The servants may do only what the law specifically authorizes them to do.
[23:19.120 --> 23:24.600]  Now the clerk may be concerned about policy.
[23:24.600 --> 23:30.320]  Well, I'm not a public servant so I could care less about policy.
[23:30.320 --> 23:36.200]  I go to the district attorney with a criminal complaint and he says, oh, you need to take
[23:36.200 --> 23:37.440]  that to the police department.
[23:37.440 --> 23:42.640]  I said, no, maybe you need to take that to the police department or maybe a clerk or
[23:42.640 --> 23:47.760]  somebody else working here does, but I don't.
[23:47.760 --> 23:52.360]  Those are your policies and all of the employees that work under you, they may have to follow
[23:52.360 --> 23:54.560]  your policies.
[23:54.560 --> 23:57.960]  I am not your employee.
[23:57.960 --> 24:03.600]  You are the employee, you are my servant, I am the master.
[24:03.600 --> 24:08.600]  You may only do what the law specifically authorizes you to do so you may have to follow
[24:08.600 --> 24:13.320]  those policies intended to ensure compliance with law.
[24:13.320 --> 24:26.280]  Me on the other hand, I can do anything I want to unless I as the master in conjunction
[24:26.280 --> 24:36.880]  with all my other fellow masters, unless we have come together and authorized our legislature
[24:36.880 --> 24:45.200]  to pass laws that restricted our behavior in certain circumstances and we've done that.
[24:45.200 --> 24:53.360]  We've agreed to forbid ourselves to commit murder, to steal from one another, all sorts
[24:53.360 --> 24:59.280]  of things we've laid down in law that forbids us to do certain things.
[24:59.280 --> 25:07.680]  But if we have not passed a law specifically commanding us not to do something, we can
[25:07.680 --> 25:10.360]  do it.
[25:10.360 --> 25:16.040]  There is nothing in law that prevents a private citizen from giving notice to the grand jury.
[25:16.040 --> 25:24.360]  As a matter of fact, it is the specific duty of the grand jury to examine into all criminal,
[25:24.360 --> 25:29.640]  all crimes subject to indictment that come to their knowledge by way of any member of
[25:29.640 --> 25:39.400]  the grand jury, the prosecuting attorney or any other credible person.
[25:39.400 --> 25:45.920]  So Mike sends this to the grand jury addressed to the courthouse because that's where their
[25:45.920 --> 25:52.320]  office is and the clerk gets these documents sent through the United States mail and opens
[25:52.320 --> 26:00.160]  them up, then secrets them from the persons that they were directed to.
[26:00.160 --> 26:06.920]  The first one is I think 1443, 18 U.S. Code 1443.
[26:06.920 --> 26:10.600]  That's a federal crime interfering with U.S. mail.
[26:10.600 --> 26:18.240]  The next one is tampering with a government document and those two in conjunction tampering
[26:18.240 --> 26:27.520]  with the government document 37.10 Penal Code and those two in conjunction amount to shielding
[26:27.520 --> 26:32.360]  from prosecution violation 38.05.
[26:32.360 --> 26:38.000]  So what I'm suggesting that Mike do is he sent me these complaints and he sent me the
[26:38.000 --> 26:41.600]  letter that the clerk sent him.
[26:41.600 --> 26:50.640]  I'm going to make up a set of criminal complaints based on my belief as a result of the information
[26:50.640 --> 26:56.920]  sent by Mike and I'm going to file criminal charges so I'll send a letter down addressed
[26:56.920 --> 27:05.280]  to the grand jury except when the clerk opens this one, the allegation will be against the
[27:05.280 --> 27:14.600]  clerk for 3903 official oppression denying Mike the full free access to her enjoyment
[27:14.600 --> 27:25.040]  right 37.10 tampering with government document 38.05 shielding from prosecution.
[27:25.040 --> 27:33.520]  Mike will file with the FBI criminal complaint against the clerk for interfering with U.S.
[27:33.520 --> 27:35.640]  mail.
[27:35.640 --> 27:39.440]  We'll see how this works out for her.
[27:39.440 --> 27:47.640]  This may be a perfect opportunity to pry the prosecutor and the district clerk out from
[27:47.640 --> 27:50.080]  in front of the grand jury.
[27:50.080 --> 27:54.640]  We are the masters, they are the servants.
[27:54.640 --> 27:58.920]  They don't get to decide what our policy is.
[27:58.920 --> 28:04.640]  Now they can decide what their policy is but not ours so this should get really interesting.
[28:04.640 --> 28:11.360]  Eric, I will have a caller on the board and we've exhausted this subject so we've got
[28:11.360 --> 28:13.360]  about almost two minutes.
[28:13.360 --> 28:16.480]  Eric, what do you have for us today?
[28:16.480 --> 28:17.960]  Hey Randy.
[28:17.960 --> 28:18.960]  Howdy.
[28:18.960 --> 28:27.280]  Maybe you remember me, I sent you some emails about a week ago about my case, the restraining
[28:27.280 --> 28:35.080]  order violation in Massachusetts and I've done some of the leg work that you had advised
[28:35.080 --> 28:36.080]  me to do.
[28:36.080 --> 28:41.520]  I was talking to my lawyer and asked him for basically a copy of all the important documents
[28:41.520 --> 28:48.560]  in my case and he's not very receptive to all of that and so I was calling him to...
[28:48.560 --> 28:50.560]  Do you bar grieve him?
[28:50.560 --> 28:51.560]  Sure.
[28:51.560 --> 28:54.400]  No, that's what I'm due to all this.
[28:54.400 --> 28:57.680]  If you bar grieve him, he'll get real receptive.
[28:57.680 --> 28:59.720]  Okay.
[28:59.720 --> 29:08.520]  And then he'll move the court to withdraw and you object to it.
[29:08.520 --> 29:14.120]  Is your lawyer, did you hire this lawyer or is he court appointed?
[29:14.120 --> 29:17.280]  No, I hired him.
[29:17.280 --> 29:20.040]  You paid him.
[29:20.040 --> 29:22.640]  He has a job.
[29:22.640 --> 29:25.280]  He don't get to quit.
[29:25.280 --> 29:29.760]  When you bar grieve him, it'll double his malpractice insurance and he's going to want
[29:29.760 --> 29:38.200]  to run like a rabbit or you could call him and say, look, you need to get these filed
[29:38.200 --> 29:45.040]  or I'll bar grieve you tomorrow because a bar griever doesn't really hurt him.
[29:45.040 --> 29:48.600]  I'll explain bar grievances when we come back on the other side.
[29:48.600 --> 29:52.880]  They are probably the most powerful tool you have.
[29:52.880 --> 29:57.440]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue La Radio, we'll be right back.
[29:57.440 --> 30:06.920]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under
[30:06.920 --> 30:08.400]  the blood alcohol limit.
[30:08.400 --> 30:13.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalyzers and a government
[30:13.320 --> 30:15.880]  cover up in a moment.
[30:15.880 --> 30:17.440]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.440 --> 30:21.080]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.080 --> 30:25.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.840 --> 30:30.960]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.960 --> 30:33.600]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.600 --> 30:37.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[30:37.880 --> 30:41.440]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[30:41.440 --> 30:43.520]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:43.520 --> 30:47.000]  Ever hear the term fine farming?
[30:47.000 --> 30:51.520]  It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and it's apparently big business
[30:51.520 --> 30:53.320]  in the sunshine state of Florida.
[30:53.320 --> 30:59.720]  This case involves breathalyzers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[30:59.720 --> 31:04.400]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated.
[31:04.400 --> 31:08.040]  State officials knew about it for two and a half years but did nothing.
[31:08.040 --> 31:13.040]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document
[31:13.040 --> 31:14.040]  the problem.
[31:14.040 --> 31:18.920]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life but now that the cover-up has been exposed,
[31:18.920 --> 31:21.800]  perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[31:21.800 --> 31:30.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.760 --> 31:36.120]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[31:36.120 --> 31:41.560]  The government says that fire brought it down, however, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[31:41.560 --> 31:43.160]  it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.160 --> 31:45.840]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:45.840 --> 31:48.600]  Thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[31:48.600 --> 31:49.960]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:49.960 --> 31:50.960]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:50.960 --> 31:52.440]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:52.440 --> 31:53.440]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.440 --> 31:55.080]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.080 --> 31:57.720]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.720 --> 32:02.360]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.360 --> 32:05.200]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.200 --> 32:07.600]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:07.600 --> 32:10.800]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to
[32:10.800 --> 32:12.840]  stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.840 --> 32:16.160]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.160 --> 32:20.200]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.200 --> 32:24.040]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.040 --> 32:25.520]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.520 --> 32:29.400]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.400 --> 32:33.200]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.200 --> 32:35.560]  is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.560 --> 32:39.560]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.560 --> 32:40.880]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.880 --> 32:44.240]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.240 --> 32:48.640]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.640 --> 32:50.960]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.960 --> 32:54.160]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.160 --> 33:13.640]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:13.640 --> 33:38.680]  Okay.
[33:38.680 --> 33:39.680]  We are back.
[33:39.680 --> 33:44.080]  Eddie Kelton, the Rule of Law Radio, and Eric, you have to watch me.
[33:44.080 --> 33:48.160]  Sometimes you touch on a subject that everybody needs to hear.
[33:48.160 --> 33:53.200]  So sometimes I'm talking to you and sometimes I'm talking to everybody else who's listening.
[33:53.200 --> 33:59.800]  So the thing about bar grievances, they are so powerful.
[33:59.800 --> 34:06.240]  It's something you can do to the lawyer and there's nothing he can do about it.
[34:06.240 --> 34:11.880]  He can't even mention it to you because if he mentions it to you, you can grieve him
[34:11.880 --> 34:14.880]  for that.
[34:14.880 --> 34:17.960]  The bar or state bar won't do anything.
[34:17.960 --> 34:20.320]  They don't care.
[34:20.320 --> 34:25.000]  And their insurance carriers know they won't do anything.
[34:25.000 --> 34:29.920]  They're just like your full coverage on your car.
[34:29.920 --> 34:31.960]  You get a new car, go down to Walmart.
[34:31.960 --> 34:35.800]  You go inside, come out, somebody's bashed a fender in.
[34:35.800 --> 34:40.120]  You call the insurance company, they come out, fix it, double your rates.
[34:40.120 --> 34:44.200]  You go down next week, somebody bashes in another one.
[34:44.200 --> 34:47.320]  You call them, they fix it, they cancel.
[34:47.320 --> 34:49.680]  Your fault, their fault, nobody's fault.
[34:49.680 --> 34:52.160]  They don't care.
[34:52.160 --> 34:58.520]  If you are a lawyer, one bar grievance your first year of practice, they'll cancel immediately.
[34:58.520 --> 35:02.760]  Two bar grievances, any one year of practice they will cancel.
[35:02.760 --> 35:05.960]  You've been practicing 20 years, they'll cancel.
[35:05.960 --> 35:10.080]  Three, they'll cancel your law firm's malpractice insurance.
[35:10.080 --> 35:13.800]  It is bad news.
[35:13.800 --> 35:20.160]  And when you grieve the lawyer or even threaten to grieve the lawyer, you give him plausible
[35:20.160 --> 35:21.160]  deniability.
[35:21.160 --> 35:27.800]  His only real purpose is to make sure you don't have grounds for appeal.
[35:27.800 --> 35:33.080]  That's why he don't want to file your motions and pleadings.
[35:33.080 --> 35:37.980]  But if you let him know, I call you, you respond to me.
[35:37.980 --> 35:41.600]  You don't respond to me, I bargrieve you.
[35:41.600 --> 35:47.080]  I have a website up, bargrievance.website.
[35:47.080 --> 35:50.440]  Go there, front page, at the bottom there's a link.
[35:50.440 --> 35:58.040]  I have taken the American Bar Association model standards.
[35:58.040 --> 36:04.680]  47 states adopted these standards, three of them didn't.
[36:04.680 --> 36:08.880]  But the three that didn't adopted their own set of standards and they're all essentially
[36:08.880 --> 36:10.840]  the same.
[36:10.840 --> 36:13.840]  What's wrong for a lawyer to do is wrong in every state.
[36:13.840 --> 36:23.440]  So you go through this and in five questions I can get you to any particular standard.
[36:23.440 --> 36:29.960]  And I also have the American Bar Association standards for the prosecutorial function.
[36:29.960 --> 36:33.000]  Most people don't know that even exists.
[36:33.000 --> 36:40.040]  You will be amazed at what you can hammer both your lawyer and the prosecutor for.
[36:40.040 --> 36:47.560]  I spoke when we started about the ebook and how you'll never win your case simply because
[36:47.560 --> 36:50.600]  you have the law and the facts on your side.
[36:50.600 --> 36:51.600]  Forget about that nonsense.
[36:51.600 --> 36:55.760]  They're going to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[36:55.760 --> 37:03.320]  You'll win your case if you have the politics on your side and all politics is local.
[37:03.320 --> 37:08.320]  You want to generate some big time local politics.
[37:08.320 --> 37:16.280]  You file a criminal complaint against the judge with the special agent in charge in
[37:16.280 --> 37:23.080]  California where you're at, accusing the judge of exerting the authority does not expressly
[37:23.080 --> 37:31.200]  have by prosecuting you from Massachusetts when you live in California, then let him
[37:31.200 --> 37:39.240]  try to explain that, which is going to be the next thing I go to for having explained
[37:39.240 --> 37:40.240]  what this is about.
[37:40.240 --> 37:47.280]  This is about a restraining order, a couple as a child involved separation and we all
[37:47.280 --> 37:50.280]  know how those get acrimonious.
[37:50.280 --> 38:00.920]  The mother filed a restraining order and Eric, you moved to California to explain a restraining
[38:00.920 --> 38:03.680]  order expired in Massachusetts.
[38:03.680 --> 38:09.720]  The judge renewed the restraining order while you were in California and then the judge
[38:09.720 --> 38:18.240]  filed a contempt of court charge against you from Massachusetts claiming that you breached
[38:18.240 --> 38:22.160]  a restraining order from California.
[38:22.160 --> 38:24.920]  That basically the facts?
[38:24.920 --> 38:27.800]  Yeah, that's correct.
[38:27.800 --> 38:36.280]  So I'm looking at this saying, how did the judge, there was original restraining order
[38:36.280 --> 38:43.840]  and you were in, were you in Massachusetts when the original restraining order was issued?
[38:43.840 --> 38:46.280]  Yes, I was.
[38:46.280 --> 38:47.280]  Okay.
[38:47.280 --> 38:49.720]  So then you moved to California.
[38:49.720 --> 38:57.600]  When that restraining order expired, the judge's plenary jurisdiction should have expired with
[38:57.600 --> 38:58.600]  it.
[38:58.600 --> 39:04.080]  You're no longer a citizen of that state.
[39:04.080 --> 39:10.840]  Now he would have had to petition the federal government for restraining order.
[39:10.840 --> 39:17.320]  There may be something in family law I don't know about because family law is not my particular
[39:17.320 --> 39:23.280]  area of expertise, but it sounds like he's going to have a problem prosecuting you when
[39:23.280 --> 39:28.640]  you live in Massachusetts, you live in California and especially since they've forced you to
[39:28.640 --> 39:35.240]  fly back and forth several times, they punish you without an adjudication of guilt.
[39:35.240 --> 39:43.680]  So since your lawyer's not working in your behalf, there's no reason for you to be nice
[39:43.680 --> 39:46.680]  to these folks.
[39:46.680 --> 39:55.440]  That is my point about always expect the judge to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[39:55.440 --> 39:58.360]  So if you have a judge who's going to rule against you out of hand at every turn, how
[39:58.360 --> 40:04.840]  do you conduct yourself so that you have a chance of winning your case?
[40:04.840 --> 40:10.160]  Well like Dr. Freda Gray says, your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for
[40:10.160 --> 40:11.160]  appeal.
[40:11.160 --> 40:16.040]  The judge, the duty of the judge is to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of
[40:16.040 --> 40:22.360]  evidence, then apply the laws as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[40:22.360 --> 40:23.360]  That's it.
[40:23.360 --> 40:33.440]  So when you're simply putting the facts and law on the record, they will figure it out.
[40:33.440 --> 40:34.440]  They'll know what you're doing.
[40:34.440 --> 40:37.840]  You're taking this to the appeals court and see what the appeals court says.
[40:37.840 --> 40:46.880]  Now let's look at the law, there's more laws affecting them than affecting you.
[40:46.880 --> 40:54.640]  There's a set of laws that only public officials can violate and they violate them with impunity.
[40:54.640 --> 41:01.240]  So what I was going to suggest to you is you make up a criminal complaint against the judge.
[41:01.240 --> 41:11.040]  Now they're going to tell you, oh, we're the judges and we have absolute immunity from
[41:11.040 --> 41:12.040]  prosecution.
[41:12.040 --> 41:20.800]  Well, that is exactly true, but they left the word out.
[41:20.800 --> 41:29.320]  They have absolute immunity from civil prosecution.
[41:29.320 --> 41:36.560]  Nobody has immunity from criminal prosecution, zero, nada.
[41:36.560 --> 41:43.280]  So you go to the special agent in charge and you don't go to him, you send them a certified
[41:43.280 --> 41:50.480]  letter, make up a criminal complaint against the judge for prosecuting you or attempting
[41:50.480 --> 41:58.840]  to hold you in contempt of court on a restraining order that was renewed when you were a resident
[41:58.840 --> 42:02.120]  of California and not Massachusetts.
[42:02.120 --> 42:09.960]  Therefore he lacks subject matter jurisdiction, frankly, don't care if he had jurisdiction
[42:09.960 --> 42:10.960]  or not.
[42:10.960 --> 42:16.800]  This is not about the rule of law, it's about politics.
[42:16.800 --> 42:22.920]  You file that with the SAC and he's not going to act on it.
[42:22.920 --> 42:25.720]  You can be absolutely sure of that.
[42:25.720 --> 42:32.320]  And when he doesn't act on it, then you file a complaint with the U.S. attorney against
[42:32.320 --> 42:46.360]  the SAC, accusing him of misfeasance in office by failing to prosecute the judge under 18
[42:46.360 --> 42:52.320]  U.S. Code 242 and in the process denying you an equal protection of the laws.
[42:52.320 --> 42:58.320]  Well, the U.S. attorney is going to get that and he's going to trash it, at least you hope
[42:58.320 --> 42:59.320]  he does.
[42:59.320 --> 43:02.960]  This goes to another one of my rules.
[43:02.960 --> 43:09.160]  Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want him to do because you never
[43:09.160 --> 43:14.560]  ask him to do anything that the law does not specifically command him to do.
[43:14.560 --> 43:18.960]  And when he doesn't do it, you get to hammer him big time.
[43:18.960 --> 43:26.160]  And when we come back on the other side, I'll talk about 28 U.S. Code 535 and how you can
[43:26.160 --> 43:32.440]  use that to beat him up good with and create all sorts of politics.
[43:32.440 --> 43:37.080]  Get all the feds upset at this judge in Massachusetts, won't know what's going on.
[43:37.080 --> 43:43.080]  You stick this guy on us, get us out of this spot, you'll create lots of politics.
[43:43.080 --> 43:51.080]  Hang on, Randy Kelvin, we love radio and remember our fun drive is going on so go look at Logos
[43:51.080 --> 43:55.720]  Radio Network and if you've got a few extra bucks, donate to the network, help us keep
[43:55.720 --> 43:56.720]  this on the air.
[43:56.720 --> 43:59.720]  We'll be right back.
[43:59.720 --> 44:08.120]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our
[44:08.120 --> 44:15.200]  store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, to see all our fantastic
[44:15.200 --> 44:17.400]  health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:17.400 --> 44:22.600]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.600 --> 44:26.600]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil,
[44:26.600 --> 44:30.320]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.320 --> 44:37.320]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.320 --> 44:43.160]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.160 --> 45:01.280]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.280 --> 45:04.440]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.440 --> 45:11.200]  In your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:11.200 --> 45:14.200]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:14.200 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.240]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.240 --> 45:28.080]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[45:28.080 --> 45:34.360]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.360 --> 45:39.440]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[45:39.440 --> 45:43.680]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.680 --> 45:49.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.880 --> 45:52.200]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.200 --> 46:20.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:20.000 --> 46:21.000]  We are back.
[46:21.000 --> 46:26.640]  We're here on Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio on this Thursday, the 9th day of February
[46:26.640 --> 46:29.440]  2017 and we're talking to Eric in California.
[46:29.440 --> 46:35.560]  Okay, Eric, I'm going to shut up now and I know you had some questions for me before
[46:35.560 --> 46:37.560]  I interrupted you.
[46:37.560 --> 46:44.040]  Okay, so my questions tonight were basically, it seems like this is going to be more up
[46:44.040 --> 46:50.160]  to me to lead my lawyer through this case and I want to know how and where do I find
[46:50.160 --> 47:00.600]  the evidence to... Okay, that is a big subject and my ebook
[47:00.600 --> 47:10.800]  has a section on legal research, but the short course is go to Google or any of the search
[47:10.800 --> 47:19.800]  engines and put in a search for family law jurisdiction.
[47:19.800 --> 47:29.480]  You'll get some treatments by lawyers that... You see, about half of the business a
[47:29.480 --> 47:38.400]  lawyer gets, he gets from other lawyers, referrals, and lawyers are terrified of filing documents
[47:38.400 --> 47:40.840]  with the courts that have errors in them.
[47:40.840 --> 47:49.240]  They hate to do legal research and the reason they do is there's so much law out there.
[47:49.240 --> 48:00.640]  If a lawyer files a pleading and he has bad law in it, if he has a case that's been distinguished
[48:00.640 --> 48:07.520]  or overturned, then he separatizes it and the shepherd doesn't find it, but the lawyer
[48:07.520 --> 48:10.600]  on the other side does.
[48:10.600 --> 48:17.240]  That'll get a lawyer sanctioned very quickly because the judge is going to rule based on
[48:17.240 --> 48:19.760]  the law the lawyer brings to him.
[48:19.760 --> 48:25.720]  If the lawyer brings him bad law, then it goes to the court of appeals and they look
[48:25.720 --> 48:27.600]  at it and say, what is this nonsense?
[48:27.600 --> 48:35.800]  The judge is not going to be a happy camper and he's likely to sanction the crapola out
[48:35.800 --> 48:36.800]  of that lawyer.
[48:36.800 --> 48:41.200]  A judge can sanction a lawyer to drop of a hat.
[48:41.200 --> 48:50.120]  Lawyers are really reluctant to take on issues they're not comfortable taking on.
[48:50.120 --> 48:54.440]  When you ask them to file a motion or a pleading that they're not comfortable filing, they
[48:54.440 --> 49:00.720]  do not want to do that because they're afraid that one thing, they're just there to make
[49:00.720 --> 49:06.600]  sure you don't have a right to appeal, they don't want the judge and the prosecutor upset
[49:06.600 --> 49:11.120]  at them because they'll screw their next client.
[49:11.120 --> 49:16.480]  If you're to have your lawyer work in your benefit, you have to give him plausible deniability
[49:16.480 --> 49:21.200]  and the way you do that is you use bar grievances.
[49:21.200 --> 49:26.000]  Oh, I'm sorry, but I'm kind of got off topic.
[49:26.000 --> 49:37.200]  In order to keep from having to do legal research, lawyers focus their practice on a single area
[49:37.200 --> 49:40.480]  and if they come up with an issue that they don't normally adjudicate, they're going
[49:40.480 --> 49:46.880]  to look for somebody else who focuses in that area or who's knowledgeable in that area.
[49:46.880 --> 49:53.520]  In order to find business, they write up these treatises.
[49:53.520 --> 49:58.160]  Sometimes when they have really good pleadings that they have filed on any case, they post
[49:58.160 --> 50:01.560]  that on the web so other lawyers can find it.
[50:01.560 --> 50:08.280]  Read their pleadings and be comfortable with this lawyer's expertise in a given area so
[50:08.280 --> 50:11.760]  the lawyer won't get some referrals.
[50:11.760 --> 50:16.400]  Good thing about that is you get to use those pleadings.
[50:16.400 --> 50:23.040]  When you write legal pleadings, if you're doing more than stitching paragraphs together
[50:23.040 --> 50:30.840]  and changing case and writing lead-ins and lead-outs, then you haven't done enough research.
[50:30.840 --> 50:34.280]  For the most part, I don't write my own pleadings.
[50:34.280 --> 50:43.920]  I write a little bit enough to lead into something I have captured out of somebody else's pleadings.
[50:43.920 --> 50:49.840]  The thing I'd like to copy out of the most are judicial rulings.
[50:49.840 --> 50:55.800]  Where the judge has made a ruling on a case on your issue, you copy his argument out and
[50:55.800 --> 50:57.520]  drop it in your case.
[50:57.520 --> 51:02.960]  Now sometimes you have to change the lead-in, lead-out, tenses you have to adjust so it
[51:02.960 --> 51:03.960]  reads right.
[51:03.960 --> 51:07.960]  But that's mainly what you want to do writing pleadings.
[51:07.960 --> 51:11.040]  Plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize.
[51:11.040 --> 51:13.080]  That's the rule.
[51:13.080 --> 51:14.080]  You're not a lawyer.
[51:14.080 --> 51:16.640]  You can't write it as well as they do.
[51:16.640 --> 51:19.600]  So the first place to look is on the internet.
[51:19.600 --> 51:26.600]  The hardest thing is finding the right question to ask.
[51:26.600 --> 51:27.600]  You were going to say something.
[51:27.600 --> 51:28.600]  I interrupted.
[51:28.600 --> 51:36.920]  Should I be looking for cases or law pertaining to the state of Massachusetts as well as federal?
[51:36.920 --> 51:45.440]  I'm thinking here as to a restraining order, the judge has pretty well has authority to
[51:45.440 --> 51:46.440]  do that.
[51:46.440 --> 51:53.000]  What I'm looking at is your primary argument is that the judge never had subject matter
[51:53.000 --> 51:56.120]  jurisdiction to start with.
[51:56.120 --> 52:03.720]  When he issued the renewal of the restraining order, the restraining order expired.
[52:03.720 --> 52:08.600]  You were outside the state.
[52:08.600 --> 52:13.840]  He no longer had subject matter jurisdiction over you.
[52:13.840 --> 52:19.400]  So your argument is he could not renew the restraining order because you were 3,000 miles
[52:19.400 --> 52:22.400]  away.
[52:22.400 --> 52:28.480]  If he wanted a restraining order and they have to be to go to the Fed because they accuse
[52:28.480 --> 52:36.880]  you using the phone and that would go to federal jurisdiction or go to California and don't
[52:36.880 --> 52:38.760]  know that he could even go to California.
[52:38.760 --> 52:45.720]  So the argument is subject matter jurisdiction.
[52:45.720 --> 52:56.920]  So look for subject matter jurisdiction to say California resident restraining order
[52:56.920 --> 52:59.920]  for Massachusetts.
[52:59.920 --> 53:07.200]  Run that, you'll get hits on it and you'll be surprised at how if you craft your question
[53:07.200 --> 53:11.600]  right, you can get hits dead on it.
[53:11.600 --> 53:20.480]  I was trying to put together a batch file that will go look on a hard drive, find any
[53:20.480 --> 53:30.360]  files on the hard drive, create a folder with that file's name and put the file in the folder.
[53:30.360 --> 53:38.360]  The fourth search I ran, I got exactly dead on precisely what I was looking for and that
[53:38.360 --> 53:41.580]  was pretty obscure.
[53:41.580 --> 53:46.800]  But the point is, do a search for jurisdiction.
[53:46.800 --> 53:55.000]  Then as you read through some cases on jurisdiction or some treatises on jurisdiction, pay attention
[53:55.000 --> 54:01.680]  to it and they will tell you how to rewrite your search so that you focus in closer.
[54:01.680 --> 54:06.000]  I don't use Lexus or Westlow anymore.
[54:06.000 --> 54:11.880]  I find the internet much, much more efficient.
[54:11.880 --> 54:15.760]  You go to those search engines, you get case laws and you have to read one case after a
[54:15.760 --> 54:19.120]  case after case after case.
[54:19.120 --> 54:26.120]  Better to find a lawyer who operates in this area and read one of his treatises.
[54:26.120 --> 54:28.160]  He's already addressed all of this stuff.
[54:28.160 --> 54:30.600]  So does that make sense, Eric?
[54:30.600 --> 54:33.000]  Yes, it does.
[54:33.000 --> 54:41.040]  Then one more question, how do I sue the state court or the judge for all of my expenses
[54:41.040 --> 54:43.040]  up to this point?
[54:43.040 --> 54:53.560]  Just write him up an invoice and put your name on the top.
[54:53.560 --> 54:59.520]  You were required to travel 3,000 miles for a hearing.
[54:59.520 --> 55:09.480]  The court didn't hold the hearing, so the requirement that you come was an abusive process
[55:09.480 --> 55:13.480]  and your cost in this matter was so much.
[55:13.480 --> 55:20.560]  Make sure you include your time and not just your actual cost and then the demand they
[55:20.560 --> 55:23.640]  pay it.
[55:23.640 --> 55:30.280]  This is one of the places that's also really powerful because the court's going to refuse
[55:30.280 --> 55:33.080]  to pay it.
[55:33.080 --> 55:39.040]  You file with the credit reporting agencies, put it on their credit rating.
[55:39.040 --> 55:44.240]  They're really going to hate that because their credit rating goes up.
[55:44.240 --> 55:49.840]  All their credit, their cost for credit increases across the board.
[55:49.840 --> 55:56.840]  They get real excited when you sting their credit and these are things you can do pretty
[55:56.840 --> 55:57.840]  much with impunity.
[55:57.840 --> 56:07.320]  So, okay, guys, you don't want to pay it, I'll sting you credit for each bill.
[56:07.320 --> 56:11.400]  You're not trapped inside the four corners of the court.
[56:11.400 --> 56:16.320]  Go ahead, I interrupted you, you had a comment.
[56:16.320 --> 56:21.320]  Oh, okay, so I present this in court and then, of course, they're going to deny it.
[56:21.320 --> 56:24.320]  No, no, no, no, no, no, send it to the clerk of the court.
[56:24.320 --> 56:25.320]  Oh, okay.
[56:25.320 --> 56:31.640]  If it's a district court, send it to the district court clerk and she can send it wherever it
[56:31.640 --> 56:32.640]  goes.
[56:32.640 --> 56:33.640]  Okay.
[56:33.640 --> 56:41.920]  They're not going to pay it, they're likely to do nothing with it and then when they do
[56:41.920 --> 56:49.440]  nothing, then you contact the credit reporting agencies and find out how to file this against
[56:49.440 --> 56:52.640]  their credit.
[56:52.640 --> 56:59.040]  When you file this against their credit, they're going to get apoplectic.
[56:59.040 --> 57:03.880]  Little mark on their credit costs them a lot of money.
[57:03.880 --> 57:06.520]  They are not going to be happy campers.
[57:06.520 --> 57:08.680]  Sorry, Bubba.
[57:08.680 --> 57:09.680]  Life is tough.
[57:09.680 --> 57:15.360]  You shouldn't have called me 3,000 miles across the country, especially when you maintain
[57:15.360 --> 57:18.880]  they have no subject matter jurisdiction to start with.
[57:18.880 --> 57:26.240]  There's only one time that the judge does not have absolute immunity and that's when
[57:26.240 --> 57:29.320]  he acts without subject matter jurisdiction.
[57:29.320 --> 57:33.920]  In that case, he has a zero immunity.
[57:33.920 --> 57:38.680]  You could sue the judge personally.
[57:38.680 --> 57:48.520]  So you want to look at jurisdiction in family law cases and I know there's some special
[57:48.520 --> 57:58.160]  code in case law on that because a couple gets in discord and they separate and often
[57:58.160 --> 58:01.600]  one of them moves out of the state.
[58:01.600 --> 58:05.760]  So there's a lot of experience in this area.
[58:05.760 --> 58:13.400]  So there's going to be case law exactly on your issue.
[58:13.400 --> 58:17.560]  So do some research on that and then you'll have something to work with.
[58:17.560 --> 58:18.560]  All right.
[58:18.560 --> 58:19.560]  All right.
[58:19.560 --> 58:20.560]  Thank you.
[58:20.560 --> 58:21.560]  Okay.
[58:21.560 --> 58:22.560]  Thank you, Eric.
[58:22.560 --> 58:26.600]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue of the Radio.
[58:26.600 --> 58:29.400]  I'll call it number 512-646-1984.
[58:29.400 --> 58:32.000]  Rodney, I see you there.
[58:32.000 --> 58:33.680]  We will pick you up on the other side.
[58:33.680 --> 58:39.160]  We're going to our top of the hour break so it's a good time to go to a Logos radio network
[58:39.160 --> 58:46.760]  and check out our gun giveaway and a good place to purchase the e-book and Eddie Craig's
[58:46.760 --> 58:47.760]  traffic book.
[58:47.760 --> 58:50.400]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.400 --> 58:55.800]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.800 --> 58:58.640]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.640 --> 59:04.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.000 --> 59:07.240]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.240 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:14.960]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.960 --> 59:18.680]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.680 --> 59:23.680]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.680 --> 59:28.360]  into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.360 --> 59:33.520]  Tolls for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.520 --> 59:43.960]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.960 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:49.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:49.000 --> 59:58.000]  You're listening to the Logos radio network at logosradionetwork.com.
[59:58.000 --> 01:00:05.400]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns.
[01:00:05.400 --> 01:00:11.920]  Markets for Monday, the 6th of February, 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,232.54
[01:00:11.920 --> 01:00:19.480]  an ounce, silver $17.70 an ounce, Texas crude $53.54 a barrel, and Bitcoin is rising at
[01:00:19.480 --> 01:00:22.640]  $1,025 U.S. currency.
[01:00:22.640 --> 01:00:29.760]  Today in history, the year 1976 and as testimony before the United States Senate Subcommittee,
[01:00:29.760 --> 01:00:34.400]  Lockheed corporate president Carl Kachian admits that the company had paid out approximately
[01:00:34.400 --> 01:00:39.920]  $3 million in bribes to the office of the Japanese Prime Minister Kikoi Tanaka today
[01:00:39.920 --> 01:00:42.920]  in history.
[01:00:42.920 --> 01:00:48.320]  In recent news, Israel's parliament passed a law, 60-52, Monday today that would retroactively
[01:00:48.320 --> 01:00:54.240]  legalize 16 Jewish settlements, several thousand housing units on 2,000 acres of Palestinian
[01:00:54.240 --> 01:00:55.240]  land.
[01:00:55.240 --> 01:00:59.280]  Anat Ben-Noon, the director of External Relations for Peace Now, addressing the private land
[01:00:59.280 --> 01:01:04.040]  grab authorized in the new law, said is, quote, deteriorating Israel's democracy, making
[01:01:04.040 --> 01:01:09.160]  stealing an official policy, and bringing us one step closer to annexation.
[01:01:09.160 --> 01:01:14.040]  Israel's attorney general Avakai Mandelblit had described the bill as unconstitutional
[01:01:14.040 --> 01:01:18.200]  and a breach of international law, stating he would not defend it in the higher court,
[01:01:18.200 --> 01:01:20.080]  which will most likely nullify it.
[01:01:20.080 --> 01:01:24.360]  The heart of the issue being that since Palestinians in the West Bank are not Israeli citizens
[01:01:24.360 --> 01:01:28.720]  and cannot vote for candidates in Israel's parliament, Palestinian property rights advocates
[01:01:28.720 --> 01:01:32.480]  are criticizing the legislation because of its anti-democratic nature.
[01:01:32.480 --> 01:01:36.280]  Under the law, Palestinian landowners would be offered a form of compensation for the
[01:01:36.280 --> 01:01:39.640]  long-term use of their property, but would not be able to reclaim it.
[01:01:39.640 --> 01:01:44.120]  A meeting between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are set
[01:01:44.120 --> 01:01:48.960]  to be scheduled on February 15th in Washington, D.C., and should give us a more clear position
[01:01:48.960 --> 01:01:55.480]  of the current White House stance on such retroactive actions by Israel.
[01:01:55.480 --> 01:01:59.840]  After many years of investigation, the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses
[01:01:59.840 --> 01:02:06.120]  to Child Sexual Abuse has uncovered that between 1950 and 2015, at least 7% of Australian Catholic
[01:02:06.120 --> 01:02:11.320]  priests and over 40% of brothers in some orders were accused of sexually abusing children.
[01:02:11.320 --> 01:02:15.600]  Senior counsel Gail Furness, while delivering the findings on Monday today, stated that
[01:02:15.600 --> 01:02:18.880]  the victims' accounts were, quote, harrowing.
[01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:21.680]  The accounts were depressingly familiar, she said.
[01:02:21.680 --> 01:02:25.360]  Children who came forward were ignored or worse punished.
[01:02:25.360 --> 01:02:26.960]  Allegations were not investigated.
[01:02:26.960 --> 01:02:30.600]  Priests who had been accused of abuse were moved to other communities that knew nothing
[01:02:30.600 --> 01:02:32.240]  of their past.
[01:02:32.240 --> 01:02:34.580]  Documents were not kept or they were destroyed.
[01:02:34.580 --> 01:02:40.520]  Of the alleged perpetrators, 32% were religious brothers, 30% were priests, 29% were laypeople,
[01:02:40.520 --> 01:02:42.560]  and 5% were religious sisters.
[01:02:42.560 --> 01:02:47.400]  The average age of victims at the time of abuse was 10 and a half for girls and around
[01:02:47.400 --> 01:02:49.240]  11 and a half for boys.
[01:02:49.240 --> 01:02:53.560]  May God heal, strengthen, and bring peace to all those affected by these despicable
[01:02:53.560 --> 01:02:54.560]  crimes.
[01:02:54.560 --> 01:03:23.800]  This was Brooke Rhodey with your Lowdown for February 6, 2017.
[01:03:25.280 --> 01:03:47.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:55.160]  We're going to Rodney in Texas.
[01:03:55.160 --> 01:03:56.160]  Hello, Rodney.
[01:03:56.160 --> 01:03:57.160]  Rodney, how are you doing?
[01:03:57.160 --> 01:03:58.160]  I'm doing good.
[01:03:58.160 --> 01:03:59.160]  What do you have for us today?
[01:03:59.160 --> 01:04:06.400]  Well, first of all, let me commend you for having ESP.
[01:04:06.400 --> 01:04:14.680]  It seems like you just absolutely know the modus operandi of these attorneys, no matter
[01:04:14.680 --> 01:04:22.280]  what state providence, whatever they practice in, and while I was waiting and I was listening
[01:04:22.280 --> 01:04:31.600]  to you tell this other gentleman, you nearly touched on everything that I wanted to talk
[01:04:31.600 --> 01:04:32.600]  with you about.
[01:04:32.600 --> 01:04:40.920]  So here's my situation, I actually have a court appointed attorney and he did exactly
[01:04:40.920 --> 01:04:41.920]  what you said.
[01:04:41.920 --> 01:04:51.200]  He made it into each, tried to inhibit, in fact, prevent me from appealing my writ of
[01:04:51.200 --> 01:04:52.200]  mandamus.
[01:04:52.200 --> 01:04:59.280]  I remember months ago, back in September, you suggested that I prepare a writ of mandamus,
[01:04:59.280 --> 01:05:03.400]  which I did, and it turns out it was a very good one.
[01:05:03.400 --> 01:05:10.080]  And I did exactly what you told me, told this previous gentleman to do, got on Google, looked
[01:05:10.080 --> 01:05:16.680]  up various types of mandamuses here in the state of Texas.
[01:05:16.680 --> 01:05:21.680]  And I just kind of looked and there's a piece milled mine together, kept pretty simple,
[01:05:21.680 --> 01:05:23.920]  and presented it in court.
[01:05:23.920 --> 01:05:32.920]  Well, the initial judge treated it as though it was a piece of toilet paper.
[01:05:32.920 --> 01:05:38.840]  And at that time, I didn't know that that judge had a serious conflict of interest.
[01:05:38.840 --> 01:05:47.120]  I later found out, and I went over this with him before, that he had been quoted by a newspaper
[01:05:47.120 --> 01:05:53.520]  here in Texas after he had retired, called the Prison Times, saying that he, in his retirement,
[01:05:53.520 --> 01:06:02.560]  was working part-time with the attorney general's office and also doing some cases as a visiting
[01:06:02.560 --> 01:06:03.560]  judge.
[01:06:03.560 --> 01:06:11.200]  And, well, he took my case, and the parties involved happened to be the attorney general's
[01:06:11.200 --> 01:06:12.960]  office and myself.
[01:06:12.960 --> 01:06:22.240]  Well, he never recused himself, he never said anything, but he denied my writ of mandamus.
[01:06:22.240 --> 01:06:30.840]  I appealed it, I asked for a motion of reconsideration, the judge denied it, and all throughout this
[01:06:30.840 --> 01:06:33.000]  whole process.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:39.720]  I haven't been able to get any of these judges to give me a court order with the name of
[01:06:39.720 --> 01:06:42.920]  the judge who started this whole mess.
[01:06:42.920 --> 01:06:47.400]  Well, it brings me to my issue with my current attorney.
[01:06:47.400 --> 01:06:54.400]  He was appointed to try to clean this mess up, of all days, on election day, November
[01:06:54.400 --> 01:06:57.640]  8th of last year.
[01:06:57.640 --> 01:07:04.720]  And, like, this guy hasn't called me, I've called him several times to try to get with
[01:07:04.720 --> 01:07:12.120]  him to set up some type of strategy on what we were going to do to give him information
[01:07:12.120 --> 01:07:16.200]  about myself and the issues involved.
[01:07:16.200 --> 01:07:26.640]  Well, he took the liberty of following some information, and I noticed that in this little
[01:07:26.640 --> 01:07:31.560]  timeline that he put together, and I was able to find this out by just calling the clerk
[01:07:31.560 --> 01:07:37.920]  of the court and asking what followings had been made, and to my surprise, this court
[01:07:37.920 --> 01:07:44.640]  appointed attorney had went and prepared some stuff, and he hadn't even called me or let
[01:07:44.640 --> 01:07:54.560]  me know what he was doing, and it was a timeline involving, supposedly, what I had done from
[01:07:54.560 --> 01:07:59.440]  the day that I filed my mandamus up to the point where I had asked for appeals or motions
[01:07:59.440 --> 01:08:07.840]  to file for motions for reconsideration, but he conveniently left out the judge who denied
[01:08:07.840 --> 01:08:09.840]  my writ of mandamus.
[01:08:09.840 --> 01:08:16.160]  Well, now we're at the appeals courts, and this, supposedly, was an accident when he
[01:08:16.160 --> 01:08:29.080]  filed this information in district court, supposedly, my understanding, the clerk was
[01:08:29.080 --> 01:08:34.640]  just supposed to keep that paperwork right there, and no notice of appeals or anything
[01:08:34.640 --> 01:08:39.920]  was supposed to go out to the third court of appeal here in Texas.
[01:08:39.920 --> 01:08:46.440]  Some kind of way, a notice of appeal went to the third court of appeal.
[01:08:46.440 --> 01:08:52.440]  Every since then, this is February, they've been sending notices to my court appointed
[01:08:52.440 --> 01:09:03.520]  attorney asking him to provide him with paperwork describing the issues involved so that they
[01:09:03.520 --> 01:09:07.640]  can rule on, again, my writ of mandamus.
[01:09:07.640 --> 01:09:15.200]  Well, my court appointed attorney, not only won't he respond to me, but he won't even
[01:09:15.200 --> 01:09:17.920]  respond to the third court of appeal.
[01:09:17.920 --> 01:09:21.520]  It goes back to what you were saying about attorneys.
[01:09:21.520 --> 01:09:28.000]  It looked like their sole job, Randy, is to keep you from trying to get an appeal.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:33.800]  And so, again, some kind of way, the clerk, there was a mix up in communication or something.
[01:09:33.800 --> 01:09:41.320]  I had nothing to do with it, maybe it was something from above, divine intervention,
[01:09:41.320 --> 01:09:47.200]  but they went and sent a notice of appeal to the third court of appeal, which is what
[01:09:47.200 --> 01:09:49.440]  the attorney didn't want.
[01:09:49.440 --> 01:09:53.720]  He wanted all this stuff to stay in district court.
[01:09:53.720 --> 01:09:58.560]  And ever since then, the third court of appeal has been sending him notices.
[01:09:58.560 --> 01:10:03.360]  Well, I called the clerk at the third court of appeal and said, look, he won't even
[01:10:03.360 --> 01:10:05.800]  return my calls.
[01:10:05.800 --> 01:10:13.680]  In fact, I had decided to try to get another pro bono attorney.
[01:10:13.680 --> 01:10:20.360]  And the pro bono attorney was very interested up to the point where I used one of the strategies
[01:10:20.360 --> 01:10:23.200]  from the jurisdictionary course.
[01:10:23.200 --> 01:10:30.640]  And I had said, the pro bono attorney says, I'll be more than happy to take your case.
[01:10:30.640 --> 01:10:34.640]  And they sent me an agreement letter via email and everything.
[01:10:34.640 --> 01:10:39.120]  And I said, this looks good, but here's what I need.
[01:10:39.120 --> 01:10:45.480]  I said, I need you to document everything that you're going to do before, during, and
[01:10:45.480 --> 01:10:46.480]  after.
[01:10:46.480 --> 01:10:53.360]  All the time that you spend handling my cases, phone calls, I said, I want a list of everything
[01:10:53.360 --> 01:10:54.600]  that you do.
[01:10:54.600 --> 01:11:05.480]  Well, the pro bono attorney that I had went out and tried to get myself got cold feet
[01:11:05.480 --> 01:11:10.200]  and the next day sent me an email and said, I don't think I'm going to be able to work
[01:11:10.200 --> 01:11:11.200]  your case.
[01:11:11.200 --> 01:11:19.960]  Well, you got a knowledgeable client is a problem for lawyers.
[01:11:19.960 --> 01:11:23.200]  Have you bar grieved your attorney?
[01:11:23.200 --> 01:11:24.360]  I have not.
[01:11:24.360 --> 01:11:31.360]  I have not, but trust me, I'm the type of person that I've got to paperwork right here
[01:11:31.360 --> 01:11:33.400]  in front of me.
[01:11:33.400 --> 01:11:40.920]  And I'm going to file that as soon as tomorrow.
[01:11:40.920 --> 01:11:51.000]  But I'm calling because the clerk at the third court of appeals says to me, you need to file
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:57.360]  something in writing, sir, to let the third court of appeal, even though they already
[01:11:57.360 --> 01:12:06.240]  know that your attorney is not answering the court and not responding to you, it would
[01:12:06.240 --> 01:12:11.400]  look good if you put something in writing and on the record.
[01:12:11.400 --> 01:12:17.400]  And furthermore, the clerk says, I'm not an attorney, I'm not giving you legal advice,
[01:12:17.400 --> 01:12:24.920]  I would even ask, I would suggest that you ask the third court of appeal for hearing
[01:12:24.920 --> 01:12:31.760]  on this matter before and if they dismiss your case due to the fact that you have an
[01:12:31.760 --> 01:12:34.160]  incompetent attorney.
[01:12:34.160 --> 01:12:41.760]  So I'm calling you to ask you, are there any other things because I'm going to be presenting
[01:12:41.760 --> 01:12:51.160]  my motion tomorrow at the third court of appeal asking for a continuance, asking for a hearing?
[01:12:51.160 --> 01:12:55.880]  But are there any other things that you can suggest that if in fact I get a hearing before
[01:12:55.880 --> 01:13:07.120]  the third court of appeal that I could put out there to send me an email on this issue?
[01:13:07.120 --> 01:13:16.600]  I will look through, I have a set of O'Connor's forms, I will look through the appellate forms
[01:13:16.600 --> 01:13:22.360]  and find the form, see if I can find a form for sanctions, a motion for sanctions against
[01:13:22.360 --> 01:13:27.400]  your own counsel, that's what you want to file with them, and a motion for enlargement
[01:13:27.400 --> 01:13:34.640]  of time based on ineffective counsel.
[01:13:34.640 --> 01:13:41.120]  Well, I asked the clerk, I said, how can this not be contempt of the court when the court
[01:13:41.120 --> 01:13:48.160]  has been trying to get my court-appointed attorney to respond to them every since November
[01:13:48.160 --> 01:13:54.800]  8th of last year, how this is, how can this not be contempt and the clerk goes, I can't
[01:13:54.800 --> 01:14:04.800]  comment on that sir, but to me any other lawyer who would do this in the court where there's
[01:14:04.800 --> 01:14:13.800]  a good judge there, I have seen attorneys get sanctioned, I've seen attorneys be held
[01:14:13.800 --> 01:14:21.280]  in contempt, in this case all the attorney had to do was send a letter to the court saying
[01:14:21.280 --> 01:14:29.280]  whatever, whatever, I need more time, he has simply not responded, therein lies exactly
[01:14:29.280 --> 01:14:35.920]  what you said and I say this again, it looks like you have ESP because...
[01:14:35.920 --> 01:14:45.560]  It would be better if I had ESP, but the fact is, this is standard practice, and that's
[01:14:45.560 --> 01:14:54.440]  a sad commentary, but it is standard practice, I had one caller that was pushing his court-appointed
[01:14:54.440 --> 01:15:02.080]  counsel and the lawyer got frustrated and told him, look, you don't understand, it is
[01:15:02.080 --> 01:15:10.480]  my job to ensure that you don't have reason for appeal, oops, he wasn't supposed to let
[01:15:10.480 --> 01:15:19.920]  that cat out of that bag, but that's how it is, if he vigorously adjudicates your case,
[01:15:19.920 --> 01:15:25.800]  he's not going to get any more court-appointed clients, and that's probably what he pays
[01:15:25.800 --> 01:15:27.800]  his office help with.
[01:15:27.800 --> 01:15:36.880]  Right, right, right, right, exactly, and by the way, he got paid very handsomely for the
[01:15:36.880 --> 01:15:44.760]  work, the sloppy work that he's already done, but to your point, he has done exactly what
[01:15:44.760 --> 01:15:50.400]  he has been appointed to do, even though he didn't tell me this, if I suspected it, and
[01:15:50.400 --> 01:15:56.520]  that's to keep the third court of appeal from having jurisdiction and to keep me from having
[01:15:56.520 --> 01:16:00.520]  a legitimate appeal on my writ of mandamus.
[01:16:00.520 --> 01:16:07.560]  So now, there's a good chance at this point, if you ask for sanctions from the court of
[01:16:07.560 --> 01:16:15.880]  appeal, there's a good chance they'll give them to you, against your lawyer.
[01:16:15.880 --> 01:16:22.160]  Right, I still need my day in court, that's the other major issue here.
[01:16:22.160 --> 01:16:28.080]  This is how you'll get your day in court, if you let them know that you're going to work
[01:16:28.080 --> 01:16:30.680]  this guy over.
[01:16:30.680 --> 01:16:37.920]  Now, they're likely not to give you sanctions, they're not real quick to give sanctions.
[01:16:37.920 --> 01:16:45.160]  However, if you file a petition with the court of appeals for sanctions, hang on, about
[01:16:45.160 --> 01:16:49.080]  to go to break, we'll pick this up on the other side, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens,
[01:16:49.080 --> 01:17:00.320]  Lula La Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.320 --> 01:17:04.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.920 --> 01:17:09.120]  Stop debt collectors now, with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:17:09.120 --> 01:17:13.400]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[01:17:13.400 --> 01:17:14.760]  can win too.
[01:17:14.760 --> 01:17:19.360]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.360 --> 01:17:25.000]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:29.640]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:17:29.640 --> 01:17:33.840]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.840 --> 01:17:38.960]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.960 --> 01:17:41.080]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.080 --> 01:17:46.680]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[01:17:46.680 --> 01:17:49.680]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.680 --> 01:17:58.640]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:17:58.640 --> 01:18:00.280]  collectors now.
[01:18:00.280 --> 01:18:01.280]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.280 --> 01:18:04.560]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.560 --> 01:18:07.480]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.480 --> 01:18:08.480]  I need my truth fix.
[01:18:08.480 --> 01:18:10.680]  I'd be lost without logos.
[01:18:10.680 --> 01:18:13.320]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.320 --> 01:18:17.160]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't
[01:18:17.160 --> 01:18:20.520]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.520 --> 01:18:21.880]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.880 --> 01:18:23.840]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:23.840 --> 01:18:28.360]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies
[01:18:28.360 --> 01:18:29.360]  or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.360 --> 01:18:31.560]  The first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.560 --> 01:18:37.920]  Now go to logosradio.network.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.920 --> 01:18:43.600]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.600 --> 01:18:44.600]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.600 --> 01:18:45.600]  No.
[01:18:45.600 --> 01:18:47.160]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.160 --> 01:18:48.160]  No.
[01:18:48.160 --> 01:18:49.160]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.160 --> 01:18:50.160]  No.
[01:18:50.160 --> 01:18:51.160]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.160 --> 01:18:52.160]  Wow.
[01:18:52.160 --> 01:18:54.360]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.360 --> 01:18:55.360]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.360 --> 01:18:56.360]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.360 --> 01:18:57.360]  We are welcome.
[01:18:57.360 --> 01:18:58.360]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:18:58.360 --> 01:19:08.400]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:08.400 --> 01:19:30.640]  Okay.
[01:19:30.640 --> 01:19:31.640]  We are back.
[01:19:31.640 --> 01:19:39.400]  I'm Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Reel of Our Radio, and our phone lines are open, 512-646-1984,
[01:19:39.400 --> 01:19:42.000]  and we're talking to Rodney in Texas.
[01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:45.240]  Rodney, you can have a lot of fun with these guys.
[01:19:45.240 --> 01:19:55.120]  Yeah, I know, but I thought I'd call you because you always have a few tricks up your sleeve,
[01:19:55.120 --> 01:20:02.760]  intuitively, literally speaking, that I always kind of like to add, you know, and the reason
[01:20:02.760 --> 01:20:06.800]  why is because they're effective and they work for me.
[01:20:06.800 --> 01:20:14.840]  As a caveat to what I was telling you about this pro bono attorney, when the attorney
[01:20:14.840 --> 01:20:20.720]  said that they wanted to take my case and blah, blah, blah, they gave me all that.
[01:20:20.720 --> 01:20:25.520]  They sent, emailed me the agreement and said, oh, you have to sign it, and I called and
[01:20:25.520 --> 01:20:26.520]  I gave them.
[01:20:26.520 --> 01:20:32.160]  I said, well, I'd like to have this agreement amended to include things that I'd like for
[01:20:32.160 --> 01:20:38.920]  you to do, and I named off, you know, I want them to, the attorney told me initially, oh,
[01:20:38.920 --> 01:20:44.840]  I don't have a problem with that, sir, that's perfectly normal, it's acceptable.
[01:20:44.840 --> 01:20:48.640]  We can have that amended to my agreement with you.
[01:20:48.640 --> 01:20:56.240]  Well, like I said, the next morning, before I had even had my first cup of coffee, I get
[01:20:56.240 --> 01:21:01.080]  this email from this attorney saying that, oh, well, I don't know if I'm this, I'm not
[01:21:01.080 --> 01:21:03.080]  comfortable taking your case now.
[01:21:03.080 --> 01:21:08.920]  Well, it came after I told them that I want to hold them accountable for everything they
[01:21:08.920 --> 01:21:14.480]  said and did with my case now when I, I wish I hadn't done this with this court appointed
[01:21:14.480 --> 01:21:19.480]  attorney, but hey, you know, it's hard to do that when a person won't even call you.
[01:21:19.480 --> 01:21:23.520]  Well, you can, you can sting him good.
[01:21:23.520 --> 01:21:27.440]  Go on to your, to bargrievance.website.
[01:21:27.440 --> 01:21:30.480]  I've been there.
[01:21:30.480 --> 01:21:31.480]  Okay.
[01:21:31.480 --> 01:21:35.040]  Have you went through the standards?
[01:21:35.040 --> 01:21:43.200]  There's a, you start going through those standards, there is a whole stack of things you can grieve
[01:21:43.200 --> 01:21:50.000]  him for, and if you just start peppering him, I can pretty well guarantee you when you file
[01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:55.960]  that first one against him and you don't give him, you know, I have these rules and one
[01:21:55.960 --> 01:22:00.480]  of them is never give fair warning.
[01:22:00.480 --> 01:22:04.120]  He doesn't know, you know, you're upset at him, he doesn't know anything because he never
[01:22:04.120 --> 01:22:05.120]  talked to you.
[01:22:05.120 --> 01:22:11.960]  Just all of a sudden he gets a bargrievance for not contacting your client, his client
[01:22:11.960 --> 01:22:17.880]  and not filing the proper paperwork with the court of appeals.
[01:22:17.880 --> 01:22:21.720]  He is going to get apoplexy.
[01:22:21.720 --> 01:22:23.720]  Is this a young lawyer?
[01:22:23.720 --> 01:22:30.440]  No, this guy is, excuse the expression, he's old fart.
[01:22:30.440 --> 01:22:31.440]  Okay.
[01:22:31.440 --> 01:22:33.640]  Here's the deal.
[01:22:33.640 --> 01:22:40.240]  If he was the sharpest knife in the drawer, he'd be out making the big bucks.
[01:22:40.240 --> 01:22:44.360]  He wouldn't be down here getting court appointed counsel, he'd have his own lawyer, he'd have
[01:22:44.360 --> 01:22:53.760]  his own clientele, but apparently he has a problem satisfying clients.
[01:22:53.760 --> 01:22:57.720]  So he has to come down here and get court appointed counsel, he makes Trump change about
[01:22:57.720 --> 01:23:01.120]  350 bucks a client.
[01:23:01.120 --> 01:23:07.720]  In the county I live in, if your court appointed counsel and you get your client to take a
[01:23:07.720 --> 01:23:12.080]  deal, they'll pay you 250 bucks.
[01:23:12.080 --> 01:23:19.200]  If you adjudicate his case, they'll pay you 125.
[01:23:19.200 --> 01:23:21.200]  How does that work?
[01:23:21.200 --> 01:23:24.440]  Anyway, you sting him.
[01:23:24.440 --> 01:23:37.480]  This attorney, I noticed he wasn't going to return calls and I called his office, his
[01:23:37.480 --> 01:23:44.080]  paralegal answered the phone and this paralegal was scared because I was saying, okay, here's
[01:23:44.080 --> 01:23:45.080]  what's happening.
[01:23:45.080 --> 01:23:49.680]  I've kept notes on the dates and times that I've called this guy and he has called me
[01:23:49.680 --> 01:23:57.720]  back and well, long story short, I decided to do a little research on the attorney myself.
[01:23:57.720 --> 01:24:02.720]  So I looked at the cases that he's done in the federal court.
[01:24:02.720 --> 01:24:05.160]  I looked at the case he's done in district court.
[01:24:05.160 --> 01:24:09.160]  I look at the cases that he's appealed at the third court.
[01:24:09.160 --> 01:24:13.680]  All of these cases have one common connection there.
[01:24:13.680 --> 01:24:23.680]  They're all mostly family and child protection cases where he was appointed the, I forget
[01:24:23.680 --> 01:24:27.400]  the legal word for- Attorney Adlytum?
[01:24:27.400 --> 01:24:29.680]  Adlytum, yeah.
[01:24:29.680 --> 01:24:36.680]  And it looked like he threw all of them, I'm not going to say all of them because when
[01:24:36.680 --> 01:24:43.640]  I talk with the clerk of the court, I won't say which one the clerk says, yes, Mr. So-and-so
[01:24:43.640 --> 01:24:53.200]  has a reputation and he didn't mean that in a good way and I did not.
[01:24:53.200 --> 01:25:02.200]  You might contact some of his previous clients and suggest to them that they've been thrown
[01:25:02.200 --> 01:25:07.480]  under the bus.
[01:25:07.480 --> 01:25:17.040]  If the bar association can't police their members, we may need to do that for them.
[01:25:17.040 --> 01:25:21.720]  I'm looking at putting together a paralegal service for the purpose of auditing court
[01:25:21.720 --> 01:25:24.600]  cases.
[01:25:24.600 --> 01:25:26.800]  That's what I'm doing here.
[01:25:26.800 --> 01:25:31.480]  There's a need for it, I can tell you that.
[01:25:31.480 --> 01:25:37.720]  We start going through the facts and the law and saying, well, these are the pleadings
[01:25:37.720 --> 01:25:43.800]  and motions that are indicated by the facts and this is what your lawyer actually filed
[01:25:43.800 --> 01:25:48.200]  and this is how much you can sue him for.
[01:25:48.200 --> 01:25:57.760]  In Texas, you can be a paralegal, there's no requirements, there's no licensing, there's
[01:25:57.760 --> 01:25:58.760]  nothing.
[01:25:58.760 --> 01:26:07.560]  And as long as you don't personally file documents claiming you're a lawyer, then there's no
[01:26:07.560 --> 01:26:09.520]  illegal practice of law.
[01:26:09.520 --> 01:26:19.840]  Let me tell you what I found out when this pro bono attorney initially was open to taking
[01:26:19.840 --> 01:26:22.840]  my case.
[01:26:22.840 --> 01:26:29.440]  They picked up the phone and called the other attorney, the court appointed attorney.
[01:26:29.440 --> 01:26:39.160]  I don't know what the nature of that conversation was, but the attorney told me, well, it's
[01:26:39.160 --> 01:26:47.160]  my understanding, and I'm saying that in quotes, this is what he said, it's my understanding
[01:26:47.160 --> 01:26:53.360]  that you, Mr. Rick, is trying to go after a judge.
[01:26:53.360 --> 01:26:58.560]  I said, I don't know where you got that understanding from.
[01:26:58.560 --> 01:27:06.480]  Well, it's my understanding that you're trying to go after judges.
[01:27:06.480 --> 01:27:15.600]  That was another reason why this person decided not to take my case.
[01:27:15.600 --> 01:27:20.800]  And that's understandable.
[01:27:20.800 --> 01:27:25.400]  I sued Denton County for $11 million.
[01:27:25.400 --> 01:27:28.400]  I sued 24 litigants.
[01:27:28.400 --> 01:27:32.400]  The 13th litigant was my worst nightmare.
[01:27:32.400 --> 01:27:35.560]  I actually sued my worst nightmare.
[01:27:35.560 --> 01:27:37.920]  I talked to 60 attorneys.
[01:27:37.920 --> 01:27:44.800]  The last one was Barry Cobb, I'm sorry, Jerry Cobb.
[01:27:44.800 --> 01:27:52.720]  Jerry Cobb was the previous district attorney, and then this new attorney gets in.
[01:27:52.720 --> 01:28:00.360]  And Jerry Cobb was the last one I called, and he told me the same thing every other
[01:28:00.360 --> 01:28:01.360]  lawyer did.
[01:28:01.360 --> 01:28:08.560]  He said, I called him, I said, hello, Jerry, my name is Randy Kelton, and I have sued Denton
[01:28:08.560 --> 01:28:11.040]  County, and I need a lawyer to represent my case.
[01:28:11.040 --> 01:28:12.040]  He said, I can't represent.
[01:28:12.040 --> 01:28:15.080]  He said, Mr. Kelton, I'm very familiar with your case.
[01:28:15.080 --> 01:28:16.720]  I can't take your case.
[01:28:16.720 --> 01:28:22.840]  You made allegations against judges in there, and I have to represent clients in this county.
[01:28:22.840 --> 01:28:25.120]  I said, what's the matter, Jerry?
[01:28:25.120 --> 01:28:29.920]  You afraid those judges will screw your next client to get back at you?
[01:28:29.920 --> 01:28:33.760]  He said the same thing every other lawyer did.
[01:28:33.760 --> 01:28:36.960]  You darn right they will.
[01:28:36.960 --> 01:28:45.400]  Now I don't know if that is true or not, but I do know that every lawyer I talk to believes
[01:28:45.400 --> 01:28:49.440]  that's true, and it might as well be if they all believe it.
[01:28:49.440 --> 01:28:58.320]  So you can't ask a lawyer to do something that he considers might upset that judge at
[01:28:58.320 --> 01:29:04.160]  him because he's afraid his next client will pay the price for it.
[01:29:04.160 --> 01:29:11.840]  I never told him that that's what I was, that wasn't the gist of my riddle, mandamus.
[01:29:11.840 --> 01:29:19.880]  He picked up the phone, and if you have listened to Dr. Graves' jurisdictionary course, Dr.
[01:29:19.880 --> 01:29:23.680]  Graves said this is exactly what bad lawyers do.
[01:29:23.680 --> 01:29:30.640]  They pick up the phone and call the other attorney and try to get an overview of what's
[01:29:30.640 --> 01:29:32.640]  going on.
[01:29:32.640 --> 01:29:39.800]  Well, if the other attorney thinks that you're going after a judge, he's going to tell that
[01:29:39.800 --> 01:29:47.680]  attorney the same thing, whether it's true or false, and in my situation, it's scared.
[01:29:47.680 --> 01:29:49.800]  It helped to scare the attorney away.
[01:29:49.800 --> 01:29:52.400]  Yeah, and I'm not surprised.
[01:29:52.400 --> 01:29:54.040]  Lawyers are terrified.
[01:29:54.040 --> 01:29:58.520]  We'll address that on the other side, Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, RuPaul Radio, we'll
[01:29:58.520 --> 01:29:59.520]  be right back.
[01:29:59.520 --> 01:30:04.560]  Have you ever fed your family cornflakes or sent your kid off to school with a juice box?
[01:30:04.560 --> 01:30:05.560]  If so, look out.
[01:30:05.560 --> 01:30:08.320]  You might be sending them off to a lifetime of health problems.
[01:30:08.320 --> 01:30:12.360]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll identify the culprit in just a moment.
[01:30:12.360 --> 01:30:17.000]  Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive
[01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:19.240]  database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.240 --> 01:30:20.560]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.560 --> 01:30:22.640]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.640 --> 01:30:26.040]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:26.040 --> 01:30:30.320]  Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking
[01:30:30.320 --> 01:30:32.600]  cookies and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:32.600 --> 01:30:37.080]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:37.080 --> 01:30:39.920]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.920 --> 01:30:42.680]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.680 --> 01:30:46.920]  Many breakfast cereals, juice drinks, and other products contain high fructose corn
[01:30:46.920 --> 01:30:47.920]  syrup.
[01:30:47.920 --> 01:30:50.800]  It's no secret that too much sugar will expand your waistline.
[01:30:50.800 --> 01:30:54.400]  When that sweetener is in the form of high fructose corn syrup, you put your body at
[01:30:54.400 --> 01:30:55.800]  risk for disease.
[01:30:55.800 --> 01:31:00.400]  We're talking high blood pressure, obesity, especially in children, high cholesterol, and
[01:31:00.400 --> 01:31:04.880]  insulin resistance that can lead to type 2 diabetes, and that's just part of it.
[01:31:04.880 --> 01:31:08.920]  Food manufacturers have to list their ingredients on all packaging, and fortunately, many are
[01:31:08.920 --> 01:31:09.920]  now providing alternatives.
[01:31:09.920 --> 01:31:14.840]  So the next time you reach for the cookies, ketchup, or barbecue sauce, check the label.
[01:31:14.840 --> 01:31:16.960]  The life you save may be your child's.
[01:31:16.960 --> 01:31:19.200]  This is Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:19.200 --> 01:31:30.760]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.760 --> 01:31:31.760]  I lost my son.
[01:31:31.760 --> 01:31:32.760]  My nephew.
[01:31:32.760 --> 01:31:33.760]  My uncle.
[01:31:33.760 --> 01:31:34.760]  My son.
[01:31:34.760 --> 01:31:35.760]  On September 11th, 2001.
[01:31:35.760 --> 01:31:39.040]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[01:31:39.040 --> 01:31:43.120]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.120 --> 01:31:49.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:52.720]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[01:31:52.720 --> 01:31:58.120]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son, go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:31:58.120 --> 01:32:00.720]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:00.720 --> 01:32:03.080]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.080 --> 01:32:06.400]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.400 --> 01:32:10.040]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chem trails, but good luck getting
[01:32:10.040 --> 01:32:11.040]  them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.040 --> 01:32:14.640]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chem trails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.640 --> 01:32:18.440]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.440 --> 01:32:23.640]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense, and we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus
[01:32:23.640 --> 01:32:26.760]  member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.760 --> 01:32:31.120]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:31.120 --> 01:32:32.200]  first time.
[01:32:32.200 --> 01:32:38.400]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.400 --> 01:32:42.880]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos
[01:32:42.880 --> 01:32:45.480]  Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.480 --> 01:32:50.600]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.600 --> 01:32:56.600]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.600 --> 01:32:58.520]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.520 --> 01:33:01.040]  May not actually be kidding about chem trails.
[01:33:01.040 --> 01:33:09.080]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:34:01.040 --> 01:34:13.520]  Okay.
[01:34:13.520 --> 01:34:14.520]  We are back.
[01:34:14.520 --> 01:34:20.040]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue La Radio, and we're talking to Rodney in Texas.
[01:34:20.040 --> 01:34:23.520]  Well, I'll wrap it up, Randy.
[01:34:23.520 --> 01:34:32.360]  First of all, you've been real helpful, but again, you know these attorneys, modus operandi,
[01:34:32.360 --> 01:34:38.080]  and I'm telling you, it goes back to exactly what you said.
[01:34:38.080 --> 01:34:44.680]  Their job as their court appointed is to keep you from getting an appeal, having an appeal.
[01:34:44.680 --> 01:34:51.120]  And when this pro bono attorney called the court appointed attorney, he told him a bald
[01:34:51.120 --> 01:34:52.120]  face lie.
[01:34:52.120 --> 01:34:57.200]  The court basically told him, hey, he's going after a judge.
[01:34:57.200 --> 01:34:59.200]  And that's okay.
[01:34:59.200 --> 01:35:00.800]  You have a court appointed attorney.
[01:35:00.800 --> 01:35:02.880]  You got this guy.
[01:35:02.880 --> 01:35:04.040]  You own him.
[01:35:04.040 --> 01:35:06.800]  He just doesn't know it.
[01:35:06.800 --> 01:35:10.960]  And the one thing, it takes a mind shift.
[01:35:10.960 --> 01:35:12.800]  You don't have to get along with your attorney.
[01:35:12.800 --> 01:35:14.760]  He don't have to like you.
[01:35:14.760 --> 01:35:16.960]  The judge doesn't have to like you.
[01:35:16.960 --> 01:35:21.000]  It's probably better if they don't.
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:27.680]  It's absolutely better if your lawyer is terrified you're going to end his career.
[01:35:27.680 --> 01:35:36.240]  So if you bar grieve your attorney for something that to him seems minor, like hitting with
[01:35:36.240 --> 01:35:44.720]  the first bar grievance for failing to communicate with you, I guarantee you he's going to get
[01:35:44.720 --> 01:35:52.880]  apoplexy and if he calls you and says anything about it, then you go to the court and ask
[01:35:52.880 --> 01:35:57.160]  the court for sanctions against your own counsel.
[01:35:57.160 --> 01:36:02.760]  And then what's going to happen is he's going to file with the court a motion to withdraw.
[01:36:02.760 --> 01:36:09.760]  And then you file an objection to the motion to withdraw.
[01:36:09.760 --> 01:36:19.600]  The last case I had was in Austin where a DPS officer at the secretary of state's building
[01:36:19.600 --> 01:36:31.320]  lost his cool when I told him what part of I do not want to talk to you is hard for you
[01:36:31.320 --> 01:36:32.320]  to understand.
[01:36:32.320 --> 01:36:33.320]  He lost it.
[01:36:33.320 --> 01:36:42.960]  He smashed me into a wall, broke a tooth, then they throw me in jail.
[01:36:42.960 --> 01:36:48.600]  Which is not funny, laughing at that, but I'm just saying.
[01:36:48.600 --> 01:36:49.600]  It's funnier now.
[01:36:49.600 --> 01:36:54.720]  It wasn't too bad then because I knew that kind of screwed up.
[01:36:54.720 --> 01:37:00.400]  So they're trying to prosecute me and they called me in for this hearing.
[01:37:00.400 --> 01:37:06.120]  And the clerk, I'm in the courtroom and the clerk is calling everybody up and she calls
[01:37:06.120 --> 01:37:08.080]  me up and she said, are you Randall Kelton?
[01:37:08.080 --> 01:37:10.080]  I said, yes, I am.
[01:37:10.080 --> 01:37:11.760]  And she said, I have some questions for you.
[01:37:11.760 --> 01:37:13.240]  I said, no, no, no, no questions.
[01:37:13.240 --> 01:37:14.840]  I want to talk to the judge.
[01:37:14.840 --> 01:37:19.000]  Well, you can't talk to the judge unless you answer my questions.
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:23.360]  Well, we'll see what the judge has to say about that.
[01:37:23.360 --> 01:37:26.160]  And she said, I think I need to get security.
[01:37:26.160 --> 01:37:29.000]  Yes, ma'am, I think you do.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:33.280]  I'll be sitting right over here.
[01:37:33.280 --> 01:37:39.560]  And Bailiff comes in, he says, Mr. Kelton, will you step outside so we don't disrupt
[01:37:39.560 --> 01:37:40.560]  the proceedings?
[01:37:40.560 --> 01:37:44.280]  And when they ask a reasonable question, I'm generally easy to get along with.
[01:37:44.280 --> 01:37:45.640]  So I said, sure.
[01:37:45.640 --> 01:37:51.800]  We go outside and somebody warned him who I was before he got there.
[01:37:51.800 --> 01:37:54.200]  Because he said, Mr. Kelton, what seems to be the problem here?
[01:37:54.200 --> 01:38:01.120]  I said, well, the problem is, is I don't know if I should file impersonating a judicial
[01:38:01.120 --> 01:38:07.840]  officer against the clerk or official oppression against the judge.
[01:38:07.840 --> 01:38:11.200]  You need to go in there and find out which.
[01:38:11.200 --> 01:38:15.400]  I'll be right back.
[01:38:15.400 --> 01:38:21.280]  He goes in the court and he comes back out and he said, Mr. Kelton, the judge will see
[01:38:21.280 --> 01:38:22.280]  you.
[01:38:22.280 --> 01:38:23.280]  So well, that's very nice.
[01:38:23.280 --> 01:38:24.280]  Thank you.
[01:38:24.280 --> 01:38:31.840]  The judge, I go back in, the judge calls me up and it was Elizabeth Earle.
[01:38:31.840 --> 01:38:35.400]  And I'm looking at Elizabeth Earle.
[01:38:35.400 --> 01:38:44.000]  We had a 25 year district attorney who just retired and his name was Ron Earle.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:48.440]  Good chance they're related.
[01:38:48.440 --> 01:38:51.120]  It was his daughter.
[01:38:51.120 --> 01:38:57.840]  So she calls me up and she said to you, Randall Kelton, I said, yes, your honor, I am.
[01:38:57.840 --> 01:39:05.960]  I have this summons here, but it doesn't tell me why I've been summoned to this hearing.
[01:39:05.960 --> 01:39:07.840]  You want to tell me what I'm doing here?
[01:39:07.840 --> 01:39:12.880]  Well, Mr. Kelton, we wanted to find out if you had counsel.
[01:39:12.880 --> 01:39:19.520]  I said, well, your honor, I have read 28.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and it lists
[01:39:19.520 --> 01:39:27.480]  all those things you can order me to court for to see if I have counsel, not one of them.
[01:39:27.480 --> 01:39:31.400]  And she sat back in her seat and you could see her jaw muscles working.
[01:39:31.400 --> 01:39:37.360]  But I'm thinking, you know, she's probably the most political judge I could have.
[01:39:37.360 --> 01:39:42.240]  So she leaned forward and said, well, Mr. Kelton, we needed to know if you had counsel.
[01:39:42.240 --> 01:39:48.200]  And so I decided not to press her further and I said, no, your honor, I do not.
[01:39:48.200 --> 01:39:50.640]  Would you, are you going to hire counsel?
[01:39:50.640 --> 01:39:52.400]  No, I'm not.
[01:39:52.400 --> 01:39:54.080]  Would you like me to appoint you counsel?
[01:39:54.080 --> 01:39:55.080]  I don't care what you do.
[01:39:55.080 --> 01:39:58.520]  Well, Mr. Kelton, I'm going to appoint you counsel.
[01:39:58.520 --> 01:40:05.160]  I said, well, if you do judge, make sure you appoint somebody you really don't like.
[01:40:05.160 --> 01:40:09.120]  And she kind of laughed and said, well, we have an attorney for you, you get the next
[01:40:09.120 --> 01:40:10.120]  one that comes on.
[01:40:10.120 --> 01:40:12.120]  I said, oh, so you're off the hook.
[01:40:12.120 --> 01:40:14.320]  She said, yes, I am.
[01:40:14.320 --> 01:40:21.360]  So this attorney, he comes out, takes me in this room and he says, well, okay, Mr. Kelton,
[01:40:21.360 --> 01:40:22.800]  this is how things are going to go.
[01:40:22.800 --> 01:40:24.520]  And I let him run along a while.
[01:40:24.520 --> 01:40:28.480]  Finally, I said, no, no, no, no, that's not how things are going to go.
[01:40:28.480 --> 01:40:29.480]  And he's real smart.
[01:40:29.480 --> 01:40:30.480]  Oh, they're not.
[01:40:30.480 --> 01:40:33.080]  Well, Mr. Kelton, just how are things going to go?
[01:40:33.080 --> 01:40:35.640]  Here's how they're going to go.
[01:40:35.640 --> 01:40:41.160]  You're going to go to the court and ask the court to remove you from this case.
[01:40:41.160 --> 01:40:45.600]  I'm going to go to the court and tell them, don't you dare remove him from this case.
[01:40:45.600 --> 01:40:50.440]  He is my current attorney of choice and he is under contract.
[01:40:50.440 --> 01:40:53.320]  And the lawyer said, well, Mr. Kelton, I'm not under contract with you.
[01:40:53.320 --> 01:40:55.280]  I'm under contract with the state.
[01:40:55.280 --> 01:40:57.600]  Yes, sir, you are.
[01:40:57.600 --> 01:41:02.520]  But I am the third, I'm the intended third party beneficiary and I have standing under
[01:41:02.520 --> 01:41:05.880]  the contract and the judge is going to remove you from the case.
[01:41:05.880 --> 01:41:06.880]  He said, yes, he will.
[01:41:06.880 --> 01:41:13.560]  Then I get to sue the judge for interference with a private contract and the lawyer sits
[01:41:13.560 --> 01:41:20.400]  back in his seat and I can see in his eyes, he's going to get me disbarred.
[01:41:20.400 --> 01:41:27.000]  He told me that once, if he told me once, he told me 20 times, you're going to get me
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  disbarred.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:33.200]  I went on to tell him, I said, I've got a set of motions that are in pleadings that
[01:41:33.200 --> 01:41:36.320]  are already filed in the court.
[01:41:36.320 --> 01:41:42.360]  You will adequately adjudicate every single one of them.
[01:41:42.360 --> 01:41:44.400]  You failed to adjudicate a single one.
[01:41:44.400 --> 01:41:46.080]  I'll bark review for that.
[01:41:46.080 --> 01:41:53.360]  And this was the next morning, I'm sorry, this was that evening when I got home, I didn't
[01:41:53.360 --> 01:41:54.360]  tell him everything.
[01:41:54.360 --> 01:41:56.880]  And I called him, told him, and I hadn't told you everything.
[01:41:56.880 --> 01:42:02.960]  And this is, I told him that I had these motions filed and he'll adjudicate all of them or
[01:42:02.960 --> 01:42:03.960]  I'll bark review.
[01:42:03.960 --> 01:42:09.680]  And he said, Mr. Kelton, you would grieve me in a heartbeat.
[01:42:09.680 --> 01:42:12.200]  Well, I don't like to be threatened.
[01:42:12.200 --> 01:42:15.840]  I said, well, I was just trying to give you a heads up.
[01:42:15.840 --> 01:42:18.320]  If you don't want any more heads up, that'll be fine.
[01:42:18.320 --> 01:42:20.320]  We'll just follow the thunder.
[01:42:20.320 --> 01:42:23.240]  So I hung up on him.
[01:42:23.240 --> 01:42:28.760]  He called me at eight o'clock the next morning, nice as apple pie, trying to find a way to
[01:42:28.760 --> 01:42:31.400]  get along with me.
[01:42:31.400 --> 01:42:39.280]  The last time we were in court, he, the lawyer and the prosecutor were up at the bench talking
[01:42:39.280 --> 01:42:40.280]  to the judge.
[01:42:40.280 --> 01:42:46.120]  The lawyer comes back to me and said to me, the prosecutor said, she knows who you are.
[01:42:46.120 --> 01:42:50.720]  And if you start filing criminal charges, she's going to charge you with tampering
[01:42:50.720 --> 01:42:51.720]  the government document.
[01:42:51.720 --> 01:42:56.160]  And I looked over at her and said, she said that did she said, yes, you did.
[01:42:56.160 --> 01:42:57.560]  Well, you need to get her over here.
[01:42:57.560 --> 01:42:59.220]  I got third.
[01:42:59.220 --> 01:43:05.600]  I need verified and I pulled them out of my case and pointed at the prosecutor, you get
[01:43:05.600 --> 01:43:06.600]  over here.
[01:43:06.600 --> 01:43:08.960]  And she backed up, scooched up against the bench.
[01:43:08.960 --> 01:43:14.640]  And I turned to my lawyer and said, here, take the, and he held up both hands with his
[01:43:14.640 --> 01:43:15.640]  palms out.
[01:43:15.640 --> 01:43:16.640]  I'm not going to touch them.
[01:43:16.640 --> 01:43:17.640]  Take them you chicken.
[01:43:17.640 --> 01:43:21.200]  Did this in front of the judge.
[01:43:21.200 --> 01:43:28.000]  The judge calls a recess for lunch before I get my burrito.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:30.440]  The lawyer called me, they dismissed my case.
[01:43:30.440 --> 01:43:38.120]  They didn't want, well, they dismissed your case, Mr. Well, did they dismiss it with prejudice
[01:43:38.120 --> 01:43:39.120]  or no?
[01:43:39.120 --> 01:43:42.320]  Will you get back in there and make them dismiss it with prejudice?
[01:43:42.320 --> 01:43:49.360]  Oh, that was so much fun, but they dismissed the case to protect my lawyer from me.
[01:43:49.360 --> 01:43:50.360]  Hang on.
[01:43:50.360 --> 01:43:51.360]  Be right back.
[01:43:51.360 --> 01:44:00.040]  Randy Kelton, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.040 --> 01:44:02.280]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:44:02.280 --> 01:44:05.480]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:44:05.480 --> 01:44:06.480]  Come on.
[01:44:06.480 --> 01:44:09.280]  We all know the government caused it with their Kim trails, but good luck getting them
[01:44:09.280 --> 01:44:10.280]  to pay for it.
[01:44:10.280 --> 01:44:11.280]  Okay.
[01:44:11.280 --> 01:44:13.760]  I might be kidding about the Kim trails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:44:13.760 --> 01:44:17.560]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:44:17.560 --> 01:44:20.320]  you with little to no out of pocket expense.
[01:44:20.320 --> 01:44:24.600]  Can we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A plus member of the Better Business Bureau with
[01:44:24.600 --> 01:44:25.940]  zero complaints?
[01:44:25.940 --> 01:44:30.360]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:44:30.360 --> 01:44:31.360]  first time.
[01:44:31.360 --> 01:44:40.040]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com, mention the crypto show and get $100 off and
[01:44:40.040 --> 01:44:44.640]  we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:44:44.640 --> 01:44:49.560]  So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:44:49.560 --> 01:44:56.240]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:44:56.240 --> 01:44:57.720]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:44:57.720 --> 01:45:00.160]  I may not actually be kidding about Kim trails.
[01:45:00.160 --> 01:45:04.480]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.480 --> 01:45:11.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4 CD course
[01:45:11.240 --> 01:45:15.040]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.040 --> 01:45:19.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.120 --> 01:45:23.240]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.240 --> 01:45:28.120]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[01:45:28.120 --> 01:45:34.880]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.880 --> 01:45:39.640]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:39.640 --> 01:45:43.720]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.720 --> 01:45:49.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.880 --> 01:45:52.160]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.160 --> 01:45:59.360]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:45:59.360 --> 01:46:25.080]  Hello, oh man, in jail, got busted, oh man, I'm broke, man.
[01:46:25.080 --> 01:46:52.520]  It's K, we are back, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking
[01:46:52.520 --> 01:46:54.520]  to Rondy in Texas.
[01:46:54.520 --> 01:47:01.800]  And Rondy, the point is, once you have court appointed counsel, you got that turkey.
[01:47:01.800 --> 01:47:05.120]  He is stuck, you own him.
[01:47:05.120 --> 01:47:11.320]  And once you sting him good, you get the court to throw out your case in order to protect
[01:47:11.320 --> 01:47:14.320]  your lawyer from you.
[01:47:14.320 --> 01:47:17.800]  Courts like a four sided chess board.
[01:47:17.800 --> 01:47:24.080]  You're on one side, your lawyer's to your right, opposing counsel to your left, judge
[01:47:24.080 --> 01:47:25.960]  is across from you.
[01:47:25.960 --> 01:47:29.240]  You have a relationship with your lawyer.
[01:47:29.240 --> 01:47:33.360]  Your lawyer has a relationship with opposing counsel and the judge.
[01:47:33.360 --> 01:47:36.000]  You're the odd man out.
[01:47:36.000 --> 01:47:46.240]  So ordinarily you're at a terrible disadvantage, but if you sting your lawyer, you change everything.
[01:47:46.240 --> 01:47:49.760]  Now you give him plausible deniability.
[01:47:49.760 --> 01:47:55.880]  He either goes in and adjudicates your case or you ruin his career.
[01:47:55.880 --> 01:48:02.280]  Then he goes to these other two guys whom he has a relationship with, oh, you guys got
[01:48:02.280 --> 01:48:08.440]  to help me out here, I got a difficult client and he's going to ruin my career, I'll pay
[01:48:08.440 --> 01:48:11.760]  you back on next client.
[01:48:11.760 --> 01:48:15.200]  That's exactly what happened in my case.
[01:48:15.200 --> 01:48:21.080]  And you can get them to do it in yours, just change the politics.
[01:48:21.080 --> 01:48:23.960]  Nothing to do with law, it's all political.
[01:48:23.960 --> 01:48:26.600]  I agree with you 1000%.
[01:48:26.600 --> 01:48:35.960]  And by the way, this thing, in the jurisdictionary course, Dr. Graves said you'd be surprised
[01:48:35.960 --> 01:48:44.680]  how many of these court appointed attorneys negotiate contingency fees.
[01:48:44.680 --> 01:48:49.720]  They already divvy up who's going to get this and who's going to get that before they've
[01:48:49.720 --> 01:48:57.920]  even made any attempt to represent their client and most of the time they don't.
[01:48:57.920 --> 01:49:01.240]  And it's pretty pathetic.
[01:49:01.240 --> 01:49:06.360]  That's what makes it so devastating when they get a client who lands on them like a ton
[01:49:06.360 --> 01:49:07.360]  of bricks.
[01:49:07.360 --> 01:49:12.020]  And it's why I push this so much.
[01:49:12.020 --> 01:49:16.720]  And when that client has to, and when that lawyer has to be more afraid of his client
[01:49:16.720 --> 01:49:23.200]  than he is the judge, then we'll start getting some fair treatment in court.
[01:49:23.200 --> 01:49:29.120]  I've tried to talk with people and encourage them to be proactive, like what you're suggesting
[01:49:29.120 --> 01:49:36.240]  to a lot of the people who call and they're like, oh no, I don't want to, my attorney
[01:49:36.240 --> 01:49:39.280]  is a good lawyer and she's a good lawyer.
[01:49:39.280 --> 01:49:40.280]  You know what?
[01:49:40.280 --> 01:49:47.560]  Two months later, you find out that the same lawyer screwed them, blew them under the bus.
[01:49:47.560 --> 01:49:49.000]  That's exactly what they do.
[01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:50.800]  They don't know what they're doing.
[01:49:50.800 --> 01:49:57.440]  But the thing is, it's probably about 1% of the people who are able to do what you're
[01:49:57.440 --> 01:49:58.440]  doing.
[01:49:58.440 --> 01:50:00.080]  And it's understandable.
[01:50:00.080 --> 01:50:05.080]  Most people have other focuses and their lives are tied up with other things.
[01:50:05.080 --> 01:50:12.720]  And there's some of us that just won't be messed with and those are the ones I'm looking
[01:50:12.720 --> 01:50:13.720]  for.
[01:50:13.720 --> 01:50:16.540]  We're just not going to tolerate it.
[01:50:16.540 --> 01:50:21.960]  Like Eddie Child said, I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore.
[01:50:21.960 --> 01:50:30.620]  And trying to find those people and give them the tools they need, 1% is all we need.
[01:50:30.620 --> 01:50:36.100]  We get one in a hundred come in there and just run roughshod over the courts.
[01:50:36.100 --> 01:50:39.920]  They're going to be real careful because they don't know which one's going to hammer them
[01:50:39.920 --> 01:50:40.920]  next.
[01:50:40.920 --> 01:50:41.920]  Okay.
[01:50:41.920 --> 01:50:42.920]  Okay.
[01:50:42.920 --> 01:50:47.360]  Rodney, I got another call here and this is Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:50:47.360 --> 01:50:49.960]  He called me on my phone and I missed him earlier.
[01:50:49.960 --> 01:50:50.960]  All right.
[01:50:50.960 --> 01:50:51.960]  Well, thank you.
[01:50:51.960 --> 01:50:52.960]  Appreciate it.
[01:50:52.960 --> 01:50:53.960]  Okay.
[01:50:53.960 --> 01:50:54.960]  Thank you, Rodney.
[01:50:54.960 --> 01:50:55.960]  Okay.
[01:50:55.960 --> 01:50:57.960]  Now we're going to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:50:57.960 --> 01:50:58.960]  Hello, Olivier.
[01:50:58.960 --> 01:51:00.960]  How are you doing?
[01:51:00.960 --> 01:51:01.960]  I'm doing good.
[01:51:01.960 --> 01:51:04.960]  Sorry, I missed your call earlier.
[01:51:04.960 --> 01:51:06.960]  All right.
[01:51:06.960 --> 01:51:11.960]  That one was more about procedural process, but I wanted to give, I'll talk about, I'll
[01:51:11.960 --> 01:51:15.760]  try to call you tomorrow or I'll get you later to get that cleared up.
[01:51:15.760 --> 01:51:26.000]  But I wanted to give some motivational, I want to give some motivational inspiration
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  to what's going on.
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  I've been researching and last year in Tennessee, the county right next to us, they made, I
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:43.160]  found an article where they was talking about how the appellate court turned over five cases
[01:51:43.160 --> 01:51:48.160]  within what I think like three months, three months or something like that.
[01:51:48.160 --> 01:51:53.600]  And it was, it was talking about how the, I was telling them, the article was explaining
[01:51:53.600 --> 01:52:05.160]  that the appellate court in our jurisdiction has tightened up on the requirements and prosecutorial
[01:52:05.160 --> 01:52:10.560]  errors and almost there's a list of things I wrote down at the time.
[01:52:10.560 --> 01:52:18.320]  I don't have it in front of me right now, but I was, it was very exciting to see that,
[01:52:18.320 --> 01:52:26.720]  you know, then they were throwing out cases, reversing cases for miscellaneous things.
[01:52:26.720 --> 01:52:27.720]  I mean-
[01:52:27.720 --> 01:52:34.320]  That is good to hear and I'm betting it's all this pressure on the police and such.
[01:52:34.320 --> 01:52:42.320]  And the prosecutors got fired, this is in 2016, it happened in 2015, then the case happened
[01:52:42.320 --> 01:52:52.080]  in 2015 and the prosecutors got fired on 2016, in 2016.
[01:52:52.080 --> 01:52:56.120]  And I'm reading over this stuff and I'm sitting here like, whoa, all the errors that they
[01:52:56.120 --> 01:53:06.000]  listed in this document were clearly done in my case and I found other case which said,
[01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:14.200]  you know, grave violations, certain things withheld is with intent and was done with
[01:53:14.200 --> 01:53:15.200]  malice.
[01:53:15.200 --> 01:53:23.160]  So you got all these things, plus I have verification that my appeal court, all the cases that are
[01:53:23.160 --> 01:53:31.000]  going to the appeal court that I'm appealing to is the same judges that made this occasion
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:34.120]  happen in the county right next to mine.
[01:53:34.120 --> 01:53:35.120]  Oh, perfect.
[01:53:35.120 --> 01:53:42.440]  The judges in my county swap out and go to that county to judge sometimes.
[01:53:42.440 --> 01:53:46.080]  Oh, this is good news.
[01:53:46.080 --> 01:53:53.200]  You actually have an appeals court that's kind of, they're probably responding to all
[01:53:53.200 --> 01:53:57.760]  the pressure on law enforcement around the country.
[01:53:57.760 --> 01:54:01.680]  So they're tightening things up to keep themselves out of trouble.
[01:54:01.680 --> 01:54:07.400]  The politics is right, right place, right time.
[01:54:07.400 --> 01:54:14.720]  The way the document put it was that they, the appeals court were tightening up their
[01:54:14.720 --> 01:54:19.080]  requirements because of Supreme Court ruling.
[01:54:19.080 --> 01:54:25.640]  Tennessee Supreme or Federal Supreme?
[01:54:25.640 --> 01:54:26.640]  Tennessee Supreme.
[01:54:26.640 --> 01:54:32.280]  That's the, it didn't mention Federal Supreme.
[01:54:32.280 --> 01:54:37.320]  It was just talking about Tennessee, it was telling why the appellate courts were tightening
[01:54:37.320 --> 01:54:40.440]  up and it mentioned Tennessee Supreme.
[01:54:40.440 --> 01:54:43.680]  It didn't say anything about, but you know, Tennessee Supreme is going to get their voice
[01:54:43.680 --> 01:54:46.000]  from federal.
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:52.080]  That's even better than the federal because it will be more immediate to this court of
[01:54:52.080 --> 01:54:53.080]  appeals.
[01:54:53.080 --> 01:54:56.600]  So this is really good news.
[01:54:56.600 --> 01:55:05.240]  You get to go into this circuit or this court of appeals and cite their own cases.
[01:55:05.240 --> 01:55:06.240]  Right.
[01:55:06.240 --> 01:55:10.640]  It'll be hard for them to disagree with their own cases.
[01:55:10.640 --> 01:55:14.040]  It sounds like you're getting in really good shape.
[01:55:14.040 --> 01:55:18.000]  And the thing is these guys, they got their cases, one of them got overturned, the other
[01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:23.520]  got new trials and things, but they didn't even cite issues.
[01:55:23.520 --> 01:55:28.200]  The appellate court, it looked like the appellate court took it upon themselves to say, whoa,
[01:55:28.200 --> 01:55:32.160]  whoa, whoa, this is an error, this is an error, this is an error.
[01:55:32.160 --> 01:55:35.000]  One murder case got turned over.
[01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:41.120]  So you're saying that essentially the court of appeals addressed these issues to Espante?
[01:55:41.120 --> 01:55:44.120]  That's what it looks like.
[01:55:44.120 --> 01:55:47.120]  That is interesting.
[01:55:47.120 --> 01:55:53.400]  It didn't reference it because I guess it went to prosecutorial error.
[01:55:53.400 --> 01:56:01.200]  Have, have you looked at the American Bar Association standards for the prosecutorial
[01:56:01.200 --> 01:56:03.200]  function?
[01:56:03.200 --> 01:56:05.200]  No.
[01:56:05.200 --> 01:56:13.880]  Okay, go to bar grievance dot website and down at the bottom of the page, there's a
[01:56:13.880 --> 01:56:23.120]  link and it'll, when it pops up, one side will be Bar Association standards, the other
[01:56:23.120 --> 01:56:30.400]  side will be prosecutorial function standards, click that one.
[01:56:30.400 --> 01:56:36.160]  Most people don't even know that exists, but if you open that one and go through it, you
[01:56:36.160 --> 01:56:41.600]  will be amazed at what you can hammer those prosecutors for.
[01:56:41.600 --> 01:56:49.520]  And if you write your appeal where you're making accusations against prosecutors, you
[01:56:49.520 --> 01:56:56.080]  can make them in the verbiage of the standard and cite the standard.
[01:56:56.080 --> 01:57:01.520]  That's it, it's Bar Association dot website, right?
[01:57:01.520 --> 01:57:02.520]  Yes.
[01:57:02.520 --> 01:57:05.640]  No, Bar Grievance dot website.
[01:57:05.640 --> 01:57:08.800]  Bar Grievance, Bar Grievance, Bar Grievance Association?
[01:57:08.800 --> 01:57:11.560]  No, Bar Grievance dot website.
[01:57:11.560 --> 01:57:14.880]  Okay, Bar Grievance dot website.
[01:57:14.880 --> 01:57:20.200]  One of the things that amazed me about one of the reasons that they overturned the case,
[01:57:20.200 --> 01:57:27.800]  they overturned the case because at the closing argument, the prosecutor made a reference
[01:57:27.800 --> 01:57:31.640]  to rap music, rap lyrics.
[01:57:31.640 --> 01:57:38.880]  I'm like, that's the only reason that they turned that case back and said that that was
[01:57:38.880 --> 01:57:45.360]  a prosecutorial error and they violated his rights.
[01:57:45.360 --> 01:57:49.320]  It had nothing to do with the case and it was...
[01:57:49.320 --> 01:57:50.320]  Right.
[01:57:50.320 --> 01:57:51.320] ...presidential.
[01:57:51.320 --> 01:57:52.320]  Racial indifference or something like that?
[01:57:52.320 --> 01:57:59.240]  They said something about racial, the prosecutor was making a racial indifference connection
[01:57:59.240 --> 01:58:05.920]  and that was not allowed, that violated his right to a fair trial.
[01:58:05.920 --> 01:58:09.560]  Which is so much fun.
[01:58:09.560 --> 01:58:12.120]  It looks like you're doing really good research.
[01:58:12.120 --> 01:58:15.120]  This is how you're going to beat them all.
[01:58:15.120 --> 01:58:18.120]  Yeah, and this is 2016.
[01:58:18.120 --> 01:58:19.120]  Oh, this is too recent.
[01:58:19.120 --> 01:58:20.120]  This is good.
[01:58:20.120 --> 01:58:21.560]  Politics is on your side.
[01:58:21.560 --> 01:58:23.520]  Okay, we are out of time.
[01:58:23.520 --> 01:58:27.760]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Real Law Radio and thank you Olivier.
[01:58:27.760 --> 01:58:28.760]  Call back tomorrow night.
[01:58:28.760 --> 01:58:31.120]  I'd like to spend some more time on this.
[01:58:31.120 --> 01:58:32.120]  Okay.
[01:58:32.120 --> 01:58:34.040]  Okay, thank you all for listening.
[01:58:34.040 --> 01:58:38.560]  We'll be back tomorrow night, eight o'clock for our four-hour info marathon and make sure
[01:58:38.560 --> 01:58:44.040]  you check out Logos Radio Network to help us out with this fun drive.
[01:58:44.040 --> 01:58:50.720]  Thank you for listening, good night.
[01:58:50.720 --> 01:58:56.800]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.800 --> 01:58:58.000]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.960]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.960 --> 01:59:08.640]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.640 --> 01:59:11.920]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.920 --> 01:59:20.920]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.920 --> 01:59:26.560]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.560 --> 01:59:30.460]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.460 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.360]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.360 --> 01:59:48.360]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:48.360 --> 01:59:59.720]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.