ROL_2016-12-16_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:19.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:19.000 --> 00:27.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 14th of December, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,143.78 an ounce,
[00:27.000 --> 00:42.000]  silver at $16.79 an ounce, Texas crude at $52.98 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $778 U.S. currency.
[00:42.000 --> 00:50.000]  Today in history, the year 1958, the 3rd Soviet Antarctic Expedition becomes the first to reach the southern pole of inaccessibility,
[00:50.000 --> 00:58.000]  the area calculated to be the furthest on the continent from the shoreline. It lies about 546 miles from the actual south pole,
[00:58.000 --> 01:08.000]  at an elevation of over 12,000 feet. Today in history, in recent news, for only the second time in a decade,
[01:08.000 --> 01:14.000]  the Federal Reserve will be raising interest rates. The Federal Reserve's Interest Rates Setting Committee said Wednesday today
[01:14.000 --> 01:23.000]  that it would raise interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point, that is between the 0.5, which it's currently at, up to 0.75.
[01:23.000 --> 01:28.000]  The Fed statement did say that, quote, the Committee expects the economic conditions will evolve in a manner
[01:28.000 --> 01:34.000]  that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate, and that the federal funds rate is likely to remain
[01:34.000 --> 01:44.000]  for some time below levels that are expected to prevail in the long run.
[01:44.000 --> 01:48.000]  The Obama administration blocked states from cutting off federal grants to Planned Parenthood today.
[01:48.000 --> 01:54.000]  Wednesday, the executive rule stipulates that states may not prohibit an organization from participating in Title X,
[01:54.000 --> 02:00.000]  the state federal program that gives out tens of millions of dollars for family planning, for any reason other than the organization's ability
[02:00.000 --> 02:06.000]  to provide services. However, President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to support efforts to cut off public funding
[02:06.000 --> 02:12.000]  for Planned Parenthood so long as they continue to offer abortions. He has also nominated as his Health and Human Services Secretary,
[02:12.000 --> 02:19.000]  Representative Tom Price, who has also supported measures to defund Planned Parenthood, and Vice President-elect Indiana Governor Mike Pence
[02:19.000 --> 02:26.000]  is completely in favor of cutting off the group's taxpayer support, so we'll have to see this executive rule will be overturned.
[02:26.000 --> 02:36.000]  Abdul Salam Abdul Razak, a military spokesperson for the Naur al-Din al-Zinki Syrian rebel group,
[02:36.000 --> 02:42.000]  told Reuters today that within hours the implementation of an evacuation agreement for Aleppo will begin.
[02:42.000 --> 02:46.000]  The deal included the evacuation of people from the villages of Faoua and Kefraya.
[02:46.000 --> 02:54.000]  Some 50,000 people, including militants and their families and whoever wants to leave among civilians, will be headed for the province of Idlib.
[02:54.000 --> 02:59.000]  This was Bookrody with the lowdown for December 14, 2016.
[03:24.000 --> 03:40.000]  Okay. Howdy, howdy. Randy Kelkin, Rule of Law Radio on this sat Friday, the 16th day of December 2016.
[03:40.000 --> 03:47.000]  I'm going to start. Your phone lines are open. We'll keep them open all night. I'll make sure they're turned on.
[03:47.000 --> 04:02.000]  And I had an interesting call Thursday. Every Thursday in Wise County, Texas, the grand jury, I'm sorry, once every third Thursday of the month, the grand jury meets.
[04:02.000 --> 04:16.000]  That was last Thursday. And about two in the afternoon, I gave a call to the prosecuting attorney to find out if I got my no bills, which I was expecting.
[04:16.000 --> 04:34.000]  Well, he was tied up and couldn't talk to me. But the response I got from his clerk was he would call me Monday and talk about it.
[04:34.000 --> 04:48.000]  Well, that was interesting. I certainly expected to hear that he got three no bills, but I didn't hear that he got three no bills.
[04:48.000 --> 04:55.000]  Okay. Let me back up for those who aren't aware of what I'm talking about.
[04:55.000 --> 05:16.000]  I went to the district court and gave notice prior to coming. I went to the district court for the purpose of challenging the grand jury pool under my authority as stipulated by 19 point.
[05:16.000 --> 05:28.000]  I believe it's 27, 19 point something. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure lost the exact number for the moment.
[05:28.000 --> 05:39.000]  There's a statute in there that says that anyone can challenge the grand jury pool prior to their being impaneled. Once impaneled, they cannot be challenged.
[05:39.000 --> 05:46.000]  So I noticed the court that it was my intention to challenge the grand jury pool. I didn't tell them why.
[05:46.000 --> 05:54.000]  The reason I was going to challenge grand jury pool is I had some criminal complaints that I wanted to file against some public officials.
[05:54.000 --> 05:59.000]  But I didn't tell anybody that. I just told them I wanted to challenge the grand jury pool.
[05:59.000 --> 06:11.000]  Well, I came down there and sat in the courtroom. The judge brought in the grand jury panel and went ahead and impaneled the pool without giving me opportunity to challenge.
[06:11.000 --> 06:29.000]  So when he came down and he dismissed the grand jury and dismissed the court and walked down off the bench and what he did, I stopped him and instructed him to disband the grand jury,
[06:29.000 --> 06:44.000]  reconvene the pool and give me opportunity to challenge the pool before he reimpanels the grand jury. And he refused to do that and told me I'd have to. If I was going to challenge the grand jury pool, I'd have to follow the correct procedure.
[06:44.000 --> 07:01.000]  I assured him that statute did not dictate a procedure. Therefore, it was his duty to provide me with full and free access to my rights. And this was a statutory right to which he had a duty to grant me access.
[07:01.000 --> 07:12.000]  And he again insisted that I would have to follow the right procedure. I said, well, we'll just guess we'll just have to see what Travis County has to say about that.
[07:12.000 --> 07:21.000]  And then he accused me of threatening him, ordered the bailiff to come over and arrest me. The bailiff come over and put his hand on my arm.
[07:21.000 --> 07:34.000]  And when he did, I looked down and asked, I told the bailiff, I said, Mr. Bailiff, I see you're wearing a pistol. Yes, Mr. Kelton, I am. Tell me, Mr. Bailiff, is that pistol loaded? And he said, yes, it is.
[07:34.000 --> 07:45.000]  And that was about the point the judge realized something else was going on because he just threatened to arrest me and I was supposed to get real excited.
[07:45.000 --> 07:53.000]  But I didn't get real excited. I was asking his bailiff some pertinent questions and he was not happy with the questions.
[07:53.000 --> 07:58.000]  And he realized something was going on. So he told the bailiff to stand down.
[07:58.000 --> 08:07.000]  Sorry, Bubba, that bell's already been rung when that bailiff put his hand on me at the direction of the judge.
[08:07.000 --> 08:22.000]  While the bailiff is prominently displaying a deadly weapon, I considered that an act of first degree felony aggravated assault, criminal violation 2202B2A Texas Penal Code.
[08:22.000 --> 08:32.000]  I filed that against the sheriff with the grand jury. I'm sorry, back up. I filed that against the district judge with the grand jury.
[08:32.000 --> 08:42.000]  I didn't file against the bailiff because the bailiff was acting in good faith reliance on competent authority when he did what the judge instructed him to do.
[08:42.000 --> 08:54.000]  I asked the judge as respondeat superior who committed first degree felony aggravated assault. Well, I first took the complaint to the Texas Rangers because the Texas Rangers,
[08:54.000 --> 09:04.000]  the legislation recently was passed giving the Texas Rangers authority to investigate crimes against public officials.
[09:04.000 --> 09:18.000]  But the director established a set of policies that required the Texas Ranger to seek permission from the prosecuting attorney before investigating a public official.
[09:18.000 --> 09:32.000]  Well, the reason the authority to investigate public officials was granted to Texas Rangers is because it was taken away from the prosecutors because the prosecutors were misusing it.
[09:32.000 --> 09:43.000]  And Article 2.03 gives a prosecuting attorney zero discretion as to a matter of a criminal complaint against a public official.
[09:43.000 --> 09:55.000]  So I considered that an act of criminal conspiracy to commit obstruction of justice and filed that against the ranger and the director of the Department of Public Safety.
[09:55.000 --> 10:12.000]  My purpose was to get them to get a ruling on the validity of the protocols established by the Department of Public Safety and get them changed.
[10:12.000 --> 10:26.000]  So I filed them and I instructed the district attorney that I expected him to go in there and make darn well sure that I did not get an indictment.
[10:26.000 --> 10:38.000]  One reason is I did not want to cause the prosecuting attorney any political difficulty. Let him be the good guy. I don't mind being the heavy.
[10:38.000 --> 10:48.000]  And the second reason is I really don't want to ruin anybody's career. I just want the law changed.
[10:48.000 --> 11:05.000]  However, the prosecutor did not tell me or did not have his clerk tell me that the judge, director and Texas Ranger were no-billed.
[11:05.000 --> 11:17.000]  He wants to talk to me about it Monday. That is interesting. So we will see how that turns out and I'll let you know next Thursday.
[11:17.000 --> 11:23.000]  It may well be that I actually got one or two of them.
[11:23.000 --> 11:36.000]  Okay. We do have a couple callers. I'm going to go to our calls. We have Tina in California. Hello, Tina. What do you have for us today?
[11:36.000 --> 11:45.000]  Well, I've listened to you once before. I keep missing you at times when I try to get on and it won't go through.
[11:45.000 --> 11:58.000]  But I would like to know if anyone has a way, you know, to explain or show me how to file the right report.
[11:58.000 --> 12:05.000]  What is it? A complaint against an attorney.
[12:05.000 --> 12:20.000]  Oh, in California, they have a pretty good state bar association. And if any state will hammer a prosecutor and hammer an attorney, it is the California State Bar.
[12:20.000 --> 12:29.000]  Just go to the California State Bar Association site and they will have a complaint form on their site that you can fill out.
[12:29.000 --> 12:39.000]  I need to write it so that they get, because I wrote a complaint to Kamala Harris, our attorney general, about the antics.
[12:39.000 --> 12:48.000]  One was being accusing me of fraud, which I proved I didn't do, and to our city attorney general.
[12:48.000 --> 12:50.000]  None of them did anything. Kamala Harris just...
[12:50.000 --> 12:52.000]  Oh, okay. Of course not. Of course not.
[12:52.000 --> 12:59.000]  You know, any individual case. Well, my letter stated this was happening all over the state.
[12:59.000 --> 13:09.000]  And I keep getting shot down in the court, even though I do have an attorney who is fighting for me, which is a miracle.
[13:09.000 --> 13:18.000]  I cannot do it myself because I will be given the label of vexatious litigant. They've already tried it twice.
[13:18.000 --> 13:26.000]  And if I do not have an attorney, they will label that to me and I will never be able to file again without a judge's permission.
[13:26.000 --> 13:33.000]  And I'm trying to get to the appeals court, but the attorneys have committed perjury,
[13:33.000 --> 13:39.000]  have violated the business and professional code of ethics by misrepresentation,
[13:39.000 --> 13:49.000]  by failing to notify the courts of related cases and various other frauds.
[13:49.000 --> 13:57.000]  And I would like to make official complaints about them and list the specific instances,
[13:57.000 --> 14:06.000]  but I want to be able to write it so that it goes through and doesn't just get tossed aside as me being a sore loser.
[14:06.000 --> 14:11.000]  Okay, you asked exactly the right questions.
[14:11.000 --> 14:18.000]  Now, the first thing to understand that as a matter of procedure,
[14:18.000 --> 14:26.000]  you can expect that if you file a bargain against a lawyer with the State Bar Association,
[14:26.000 --> 14:30.000]  that the State Bar will get that grievance and throw it in the trash.
[14:30.000 --> 14:37.000]  And they'll send you a letter that says, we examined into your accusation and find it does not rise to the level of misconduct,
[14:37.000 --> 14:43.000]  no matter what you complain of. And that's a good thing.
[14:43.000 --> 14:56.000]  The reason that's a good thing is I know and now you know that if you file a bar grievance against the lawyer,
[14:56.000 --> 15:03.000]  their insurance carrier knows that the bar is going to throw that in the trash.
[15:03.000 --> 15:07.000]  So how does their insurance carrier gauge their level of risk?
[15:07.000 --> 15:12.000]  By valid bar grievances? Heck, they throw them all in the trash.
[15:12.000 --> 15:18.000]  By the numbers, one bar grievance your first year of practice, they will cancel immediately.
[15:18.000 --> 15:22.000]  Two bar grievances, any one year of practice, they'll cancel.
[15:22.000 --> 15:26.000]  Three, they'll cancel your law firm's malpractice insurance.
[15:26.000 --> 15:29.000]  And it starts at like 25 grand a year.
[15:29.000 --> 15:34.000]  So think in terms of your car insurance.
[15:34.000 --> 15:41.000]  You buy a new car, you get all that expensive collision insurance, you go down to Wal-Mart,
[15:41.000 --> 15:45.000]  you go inside to come out, somebody has bashed a fender in.
[15:45.000 --> 15:50.000]  You call the insurance company to come out to fix it, double your premiums.
[15:50.000 --> 15:54.000]  You go down there next month, somebody bashes in another fender.
[15:54.000 --> 15:59.000]  You come out, you call the insurance company, they come out, they fix it, they cancel.
[15:59.000 --> 16:03.000]  Your fault, their fault, nobody's fault, they don't care.
[16:03.000 --> 16:05.000]  You are an unacceptable risk.
[16:05.000 --> 16:13.000]  It is the same with lawyers, except their insurance starts at like 25 grand a year.
[16:13.000 --> 16:19.000]  They will never tell you how bad you have stung them.
[16:19.000 --> 16:25.000]  But the folks listening to this show have heard person after person come in
[16:25.000 --> 16:33.000]  and tell how the lawyers go to the judges and just whine and cry about bar grievances.
[16:33.000 --> 16:36.000]  And we have Russell Mortland.
[16:36.000 --> 16:38.000]  He's in a bankruptcy.
[16:38.000 --> 16:40.000]  He filed three bar grievances.
[16:40.000 --> 16:44.000]  Halfway through the law firm, the lawyer quits, they get a new lawyer.
[16:44.000 --> 16:49.000]  At the end of the bankruptcy, the first lawyer came in and complained that Mr. Mortland
[16:49.000 --> 16:55.000]  filed three bar grievances and next year his law firm couldn't get malpractice insurance.
[16:55.000 --> 16:56.000]  Hang on.
[16:56.000 --> 16:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[16:57.000 --> 17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:01.000]  Dang, cookies.
[17:01.000 --> 17:02.000]  Cookies?
[17:02.000 --> 17:03.000]  Me love cookies.
[17:03.000 --> 17:04.000]  Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers.
[17:04.000 --> 17:06.000]  No, these are yucky cookies.
[17:06.000 --> 17:07.000]  Cookies?
[17:07.000 --> 17:08.000]  Yucky?
[17:08.000 --> 17:09.000]  No, no bad cookies.
[17:09.000 --> 17:11.000]  You can't even eat these cookies.
[17:11.000 --> 17:12.000]  These are cyber cookies.
[17:12.000 --> 17:13.000]  No, can't eat it.
[17:13.000 --> 17:14.000]  Can't eat it?
[17:14.000 --> 17:17.000]  No, they're cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:17.000 --> 17:18.000]  These have apples.
[17:18.000 --> 17:19.000]  Really?
[17:19.000 --> 17:21.000]  Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:21.000 --> 17:23.000]  Yummy apple.
[17:23.000 --> 17:27.000]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:27.000 --> 17:33.000]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:33.000 --> 17:34.000]  Bye bye, yucky cookies.
[17:34.000 --> 17:40.000]  Now, I go to logosradio.network.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right
[17:40.000 --> 17:46.000]  hand side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you
[17:46.000 --> 17:47.000]  some yummy new cookies.
[17:47.000 --> 17:48.000]  New cookies for me?
[17:48.000 --> 17:51.000]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:51.000 --> 17:56.000]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this
[17:56.000 --> 17:57.000]  radio network too.
[17:57.000 --> 17:58.000]  C is for cookie.
[17:58.000 --> 17:59.000]  C is for classified.
[17:59.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.000 --> 18:14.000]  can win too.
[18:14.000 --> 18:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.000 --> 18:24.000]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:24.000 --> 18:29.000]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[18:29.000 --> 18:33.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:46.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.000 --> 18:49.000]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 18:58.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop
[18:58.000 --> 19:00.000]  debt collectors now.
[19:00.000 --> 19:22.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:22.000 --> 19:23.000]  Okay.
[19:23.000 --> 19:24.000]  We are back.
[19:24.000 --> 19:30.000]  Randy Kelton, the Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Tina in California.
[19:30.000 --> 19:33.000]  And you asked one of my favorite questions.
[19:33.000 --> 19:40.000]  My answer is not going to be quite as simple as you might expect.
[19:40.000 --> 19:47.000]  Because there's more to this than the lawyers and the judges want you to know.
[19:47.000 --> 19:54.000]  When you walk into that courtroom, you are the baddest motor scooter in the building.
[19:54.000 --> 20:00.000]  And they will do everything they can to keep you from knowing that.
[20:00.000 --> 20:05.000]  I keep saying that you'll never win your case simply because you have the law and the facts
[20:05.000 --> 20:07.000]  on your side.
[20:07.000 --> 20:10.000]  To think so is naive.
[20:10.000 --> 20:13.000]  It is not that way now.
[20:13.000 --> 20:18.000]  Never has been that way since we've had judges.
[20:18.000 --> 20:23.000]  You'll only win your case if you have the politics on your side.
[20:23.000 --> 20:28.000]  And what we're going to talk about now is all about the politics.
[20:28.000 --> 20:32.000]  Your lawyer is terrified of that judge.
[20:32.000 --> 20:35.000]  That judge can sanction him at the drop of a hat.
[20:35.000 --> 20:39.000]  He can pull his bar card with caprice.
[20:39.000 --> 20:46.000]  So I know that when lawyers go to law school, they think they're going to get out of law school
[20:46.000 --> 20:49.000]  and going to go out there and change the world and help people,
[20:49.000 --> 20:52.000]  and now that's not what they're going to do.
[20:52.000 --> 20:58.000]  They're going to spend the rest of their professional career kissing some arrogant judges behind.
[20:58.000 --> 21:05.000]  Because if they don't, the judge will screw their client to get back at them.
[21:05.000 --> 21:08.000]  This is how it works in the real world.
[21:08.000 --> 21:13.000]  Your lawyer is not going to actively adjudicate your case,
[21:13.000 --> 21:18.000]  if there's any chance of it annoying the judge,
[21:18.000 --> 21:24.000]  unless you can give your lawyer plausible deniability.
[21:24.000 --> 21:32.000]  And the way you give your lawyer plausible deniability is by being the pro se from hell.
[21:32.000 --> 21:41.000]  When you go into court, you can think about the court as a four-sided chessboard.
[21:41.000 --> 21:45.000]  You go in, you sit down, you're on one side of the board.
[21:45.000 --> 21:53.000]  Your lawyer's to your right, opposing counsel to your left, and the judge across from you.
[21:53.000 --> 22:00.000]  Multiple-sided chess is all about relationships.
[22:00.000 --> 22:06.000]  Three-hand, four-hand, you've got four players in chess.
[22:06.000 --> 22:11.000]  Generally, two sets of players will gang up and try to get the other two out,
[22:11.000 --> 22:13.000]  and then they'll fight each other.
[22:13.000 --> 22:15.000]  It's kind of like that.
[22:15.000 --> 22:17.000]  It's all about relationships.
[22:17.000 --> 22:21.000]  You have a relationship with your lawyer.
[22:21.000 --> 22:24.000]  Your lawyer has a relationship with opposing counsel,
[22:24.000 --> 22:26.000]  because he's across from him all the time.
[22:26.000 --> 22:29.000]  Sometimes they do cases together.
[22:29.000 --> 22:30.000]  This is their business.
[22:30.000 --> 22:33.000]  They work with each other all the time.
[22:33.000 --> 22:36.000]  And the judge, the judge sees both of these lawyers all the time.
[22:36.000 --> 22:38.000]  They go out and have drinks together, play golf together.
[22:38.000 --> 22:40.000]  They all know each other.
[22:40.000 --> 22:44.000]  They're part of the same profession.
[22:44.000 --> 22:48.000]  You're the odd one out.
[22:48.000 --> 22:54.000]  That can be a problem, but it can also be an advantage.
[22:54.000 --> 22:59.000]  While your lawyer is going to be careful,
[22:59.000 --> 23:03.000]  he doesn't want to lose his relationship with opposing counsel,
[23:03.000 --> 23:07.000]  because sometimes they want to negotiate deals for their clients between one another.
[23:07.000 --> 23:09.000]  They don't want the other guy mad at him.
[23:09.000 --> 23:13.000]  He certainly doesn't want the judge mad at him.
[23:13.000 --> 23:22.000]  So he's going to tend to defer to them unless he winds up with an unruly client.
[23:22.000 --> 23:27.000]  Let's say your lawyer goes into court, and the other lawyer comes to him and says,
[23:27.000 --> 23:29.000]  what in the heck is going on?
[23:29.000 --> 23:34.000]  Your client bargrieved me.
[23:34.000 --> 23:38.000]  You want your lawyer to be able to say, oh, she did?
[23:38.000 --> 23:41.000]  I didn't know anything about that.
[23:41.000 --> 23:44.000]  That's plausible deniability.
[23:44.000 --> 23:49.000]  And you want your lawyer to be able to go to the judge and the other lawyer
[23:49.000 --> 23:52.000]  and say, guys, you've got to help me out.
[23:52.000 --> 23:54.000]  I got this unruly client.
[23:54.000 --> 23:57.000]  She's fixing to kick my behind.
[23:57.000 --> 23:59.000]  She says, you guys need to bail me out of this.
[23:59.000 --> 24:03.000]  I'll bring you back on the next client.
[24:03.000 --> 24:09.000]  That may not be right, but that's how it works in the real world you and I live in.
[24:09.000 --> 24:17.000]  And the best way to get this started is you start kicking the other lawyer with bar grievances.
[24:17.000 --> 24:21.000]  Now, when you file that bar grievance, you can just go to the site.
[24:21.000 --> 24:25.000]  You can go to, write this down.
[24:25.000 --> 24:26.000]  I'm writing.
[24:26.000 --> 24:31.000]  A bargrievance.website.
[24:31.000 --> 24:38.000]  On that site, I have the American Bar Association model standards.
[24:38.000 --> 24:39.000]  Okay.
[24:39.000 --> 24:43.000]  All but three states have adopted these model standards.
[24:43.000 --> 24:48.000]  Now, each of the states have made minor adjustments to them, but they're relatively minor.
[24:48.000 --> 25:01.000]  Anything that's in the American Bar Association standards, every state will have all of these requirements.
[25:01.000 --> 25:09.000]  And I've taken the standards and converted them into a questionnaire.
[25:09.000 --> 25:14.000]  So it makes it real easy to mine down through the standards.
[25:14.000 --> 25:22.000]  You as a client, 80% of what's in the standards, you don't care about.
[25:22.000 --> 25:30.000]  You don't care about one law firm's relationship with another law firm and the rules for selling a law firm,
[25:30.000 --> 25:35.000]  the rules for when a lawyer retires or dies.
[25:35.000 --> 25:37.000]  That's not what you care about.
[25:37.000 --> 25:38.000]  So you don't have to mess with all that stuff.
[25:38.000 --> 25:44.000]  These questions will walk you through the part that matters to you,
[25:44.000 --> 25:48.000]  and it'll take you to specific standards,
[25:48.000 --> 25:54.000]  and you will be surprised at all the cool stuff that's in there.
[25:54.000 --> 25:56.000]  So that'll tell you the standard.
[25:56.000 --> 26:05.000]  Now, when you file a bargrievance, they do not want you to give them case law or a statute,
[26:05.000 --> 26:07.000]  but I don't care what they want.
[26:07.000 --> 26:09.000]  I can give it to them anyway.
[26:09.000 --> 26:16.000]  But if you follow this questionnaire, it will, as you go down,
[26:16.000 --> 26:22.000]  doing about four questions that can bring you to any specific standard.
[26:22.000 --> 26:29.000]  And the last box will be a box where you can type in information.
[26:29.000 --> 26:35.000]  I don't have it set up so I can give you an output, but it'll show you how to do this.
[26:35.000 --> 26:41.000]  It takes the standard where the standard says the lawyer shall not do this.
[26:41.000 --> 26:47.000]  It says the lawyer did this, whatever the standard is, as follows,
[26:47.000 --> 26:50.000]  and then you write in what the lawyer did.
[26:50.000 --> 26:59.000]  So you make your complaint against the lawyer in the verbiage of the standard.
[26:59.000 --> 27:06.000]  And California is actually pretty good about policing lawyers, as the state says it will go.
[27:06.000 --> 27:12.000]  Most other states, Texas, doesn't make any difference what you file against the lawyer.
[27:12.000 --> 27:15.000]  They're going to throw it in the trash.
[27:15.000 --> 27:18.000]  But in the end, you don't care.
[27:18.000 --> 27:21.000]  You file one of these, and you get a negative response back,
[27:21.000 --> 27:25.000]  and people get all frustrated and they feel miserable, they feel betrayed.
[27:25.000 --> 27:29.000]  They say, no, no, no, no.
[27:29.000 --> 27:33.000]  When you get that response back that says we examined it in your accusation,
[27:33.000 --> 27:35.000]  find it does not rise to the level of misconduct.
[27:35.000 --> 27:39.000]  When I get them, I just laugh and giggle and put it in my files.
[27:39.000 --> 27:40.000]  Oh, boy, that's a good one.
[27:40.000 --> 27:44.000]  I just made the insurance company a whole lot of money.
[27:44.000 --> 27:53.000]  Generally, by the second grievance, the lawyer on the other side is either going to want off the case
[27:53.000 --> 27:57.000]  or he's going to come screaming to the court and to your lawyer.
[27:57.000 --> 28:01.000]  He is not going to say one word to you.
[28:01.000 --> 28:06.000]  No, but what I'm not understanding is you file the first one,
[28:06.000 --> 28:08.000]  it gets kicked in the bin and you get that letter.
[28:08.000 --> 28:11.000]  Do you then file exactly the same thing again?
[28:11.000 --> 28:12.000]  No, no, no, no.
[28:12.000 --> 28:16.000]  You got so many different things that you can file.
[28:16.000 --> 28:21.000]  You won't believe all the things you could file.
[28:21.000 --> 28:23.000]  File one at a time.
[28:23.000 --> 28:33.000]  If you have a dozen, do not put more than one accusation in a grievance
[28:33.000 --> 28:36.000]  and file them about a week apart.
[28:36.000 --> 28:39.000]  Okay, that's telling me everything here.
[28:39.000 --> 28:44.000]  In one complaint, file them a week apart.
[28:44.000 --> 28:48.000]  If you put them all together and file them all at the same time,
[28:48.000 --> 28:51.000]  treat them all as one complaint.
[28:51.000 --> 28:52.000]  Okay, got it.
[28:52.000 --> 28:59.000]  But if they get them separated by time, then they have to treat each one individually.
[28:59.000 --> 29:06.000]  That will let the court know that you are an unruly client
[29:06.000 --> 29:09.000]  and never ever talk to your lawyer about it.
[29:09.000 --> 29:13.000]  Do not let him talk to you about it.
[29:13.000 --> 29:18.000]  If he wants to talk to you about it, you tell him that is none of your business.
[29:18.000 --> 29:25.000]  I hired you to represent me in court not to get into my personal business.
[29:25.000 --> 29:26.000]  Okay.
[29:26.000 --> 29:29.000]  So he's going to tell that they're going to come to him, the judge.
[29:29.000 --> 29:34.000]  Have you filed any judicial conduct complaints?
[29:34.000 --> 29:35.000]  No, I haven't.
[29:35.000 --> 29:39.000]  I like to, but I've got so much on my plate.
[29:39.000 --> 29:43.000]  It's like where do I start and how do I get it written well?
[29:43.000 --> 29:48.000]  And is there a time limit if it was against the bankruptcy judge a year ago
[29:48.000 --> 29:50.000]  or can I still file?
[29:50.000 --> 29:51.000]  Oh, yeah.
[29:51.000 --> 29:53.000]  They may claim it's too late.
[29:53.000 --> 29:54.000]  You don't care.
[29:54.000 --> 29:57.000]  They're not going to do anything to the judge anyway.
[29:57.000 --> 30:04.000]  But it puts them...
[30:04.000 --> 30:09.000]  In China, a toddler crawled out of a high-rise apartment window and was plunging to her death
[30:09.000 --> 30:11.000]  when a miracle happened.
[30:11.000 --> 30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[30:12.000 --> 30:17.000]  In a moment, I'll be back to tell you how a quick-thinking stranger saved her life.
[30:17.000 --> 30:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:19.000 --> 30:23.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:23.000 --> 30:28.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:28.000 --> 30:29.000]  So protect your rights.
[30:29.000 --> 30:33.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:38.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:48.000]  It's every parent's nightmare.
[30:48.000 --> 30:52.000]  A two-year-old girl climbed out the window of her 10-story apartment in Hangzhou, China,
[30:52.000 --> 30:56.000]  and teetered on the ledge for several moments before her parents noticed.
[30:56.000 --> 31:02.000]  Their frantic screams alerted a passerby, 31-year-old Wu Juping, who looked up at the scene.
[31:02.000 --> 31:08.000]  She kicked off her heels and ran to the building just moments before the little girl lost her balance and fell.
[31:08.000 --> 31:12.000]  Juping stretched out her arms, felt a sharp pain, and passed out.
[31:12.000 --> 31:16.000]  When she awoke, she discovered she'd broken her left arm and saved a life.
[31:16.000 --> 31:21.000]  She'd caught the baby, who had nothing but a few bruises to show for her adventure.
[31:21.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:30.000 --> 31:33.000]  Did you know there are 3 million edible food plants on Earth,
[31:33.000 --> 31:36.000]  and none have the nutritional value of the hemp plant?
[31:36.000 --> 31:39.000]  HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:39.000 --> 31:45.000]  It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten-free.
[31:45.000 --> 31:49.000]  Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein,
[31:49.000 --> 31:51.000]  and feeds the body the nutrients it needs.
[31:51.000 --> 31:57.000]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[31:57.000 --> 32:01.000]  Only at HempUSA.org.
[32:27.000 --> 32:31.000]  In conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.000 --> 32:35.000]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:39.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[32:39.000 --> 32:41.000]  and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:44.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.000 --> 32:47.000]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.000 --> 32:50.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.000 --> 32:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.000 --> 32:59.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:03.000 --> 33:10.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[33:10.000 --> 33:15.000]  Yeah, I got the warrant.
[33:15.000 --> 33:18.000]  I'm not going to solve them.
[33:18.000 --> 33:21.000]  To the head of government, them.
[33:21.000 --> 33:23.000]  Okay, we are back.
[33:23.000 --> 33:29.000]  Randy Kelton, the Rule of Law Radio on this 16th day of December 2016.
[33:29.000 --> 33:35.000]  And Scott, the producer sent me a Skype telling me to take you first and I missed it.
[33:35.000 --> 33:38.000]  But I'll get to you shortly.
[33:38.000 --> 33:41.000]  Tina asked one of my favorite questions.
[33:41.000 --> 33:50.000]  And actually, Tina, Scott is the next caller and he probably has a stack of bar grievances
[33:50.000 --> 33:54.000]  and judicial conduct complaints a half inch tall.
[33:54.000 --> 33:58.000]  He has been working these guys over.
[33:58.000 --> 34:07.000]  You made a comment going out that kind of struck me because I'm familiar with it.
[34:07.000 --> 34:12.000]  Because I'm familiar with the situation where you said you have,
[34:12.000 --> 34:17.000]  you're just swamped with all the stuff you've got going.
[34:17.000 --> 34:21.000]  And that is a common problem.
[34:21.000 --> 34:24.000]  Let me take a step back.
[34:24.000 --> 34:27.000]  And you mentioned bankruptcy.
[34:27.000 --> 34:30.000]  Is bankruptcy the only issue you have in the quarter?
[34:30.000 --> 34:33.000]  Is there more to it than that?
[34:33.000 --> 34:41.000]  No, I'm past the bankruptcy, but there's a lot of things that the attorneys did in that
[34:41.000 --> 34:43.000]  that I need to go after.
[34:43.000 --> 34:51.000]  It's basically a foreclosure case right now that they used some force deeds to get an in rim,
[34:51.000 --> 34:52.000]  which I missed.
[34:52.000 --> 34:53.000]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[34:53.000 --> 34:55.000]  You're in California.
[34:55.000 --> 34:59.000]  Did you file a 7 or 13?
[34:59.000 --> 35:05.000]  I filed a 13 and got an awful attorney who wouldn't even,
[35:05.000 --> 35:08.000]  he would not object to the proof of claim.
[35:08.000 --> 35:11.000]  And he said he just absolutely wouldn't do it because he knew it.
[35:11.000 --> 35:17.000]  Okay, you need to look at suing the lawyer for malpractice.
[35:17.000 --> 35:26.000]  You might consider reopening the bankruptcy and claim the property as unsecured.
[35:26.000 --> 35:30.000]  Yeah, it's too late. The property is gone.
[35:30.000 --> 35:35.000]  And the second attorney gave me bad advice, changed it to a 7,
[35:35.000 --> 35:40.000]  which I've been told now by multiple attorneys that I should never have been put in a 7.
[35:40.000 --> 35:42.000]  And she, you know, there's a lot of things happened,
[35:42.000 --> 35:46.000]  which obviously we don't have time to go over this on this show.
[35:46.000 --> 35:48.000]  I know you've got other people.
[35:48.000 --> 35:52.000]  It's gone on since then from a lawsuit I tried to do pro se.
[35:52.000 --> 35:58.000]  I've got a lot of res judicata. And in fact, it doesn't really matter if something happened yesterday.
[35:58.000 --> 36:04.000]  They claim that everything that they do is barred by res judicata.
[36:04.000 --> 36:08.000]  But, you know, can I ask you a couple of quick questions?
[36:08.000 --> 36:09.000]  Yes.
[36:09.000 --> 36:14.000]  And I know I could probably talk to you every week and still ask how many.
[36:14.000 --> 36:17.000]  As far as a bar complaint, if I do one thing,
[36:17.000 --> 36:23.000]  one of the attorneys, the attorney for the buyers of the property,
[36:23.000 --> 36:30.000]  one of the things he stated in court papers that I should be, you know,
[36:30.000 --> 36:37.000]  they should be allowed to get money back from me because of lost profits,
[36:37.000 --> 36:44.000]  because they were forced to do repairs on the property and forced to buy insurance.
[36:44.000 --> 36:49.000]  Well, as I wanted to say to them, but I couldn't talk because I have an attorney,
[36:49.000 --> 36:53.000]  I want to say who the damn hell, you know, put a gun in front of you and said,
[36:53.000 --> 36:57.000]  do those repairs when you had paying tenants that you kicked out.
[36:57.000 --> 36:59.000]  Nobody forced them to do anything.
[36:59.000 --> 37:03.000]  They chose to buy the property. They chose to bid at the auction.
[37:03.000 --> 37:05.000]  They chose to kick the tenants out.
[37:05.000 --> 37:09.000]  And they chose to do these repairs that weren't needed for habitability.
[37:09.000 --> 37:11.000]  They just wanted to try to flip it.
[37:11.000 --> 37:14.000]  So here they are telling this judge that I, you know,
[37:14.000 --> 37:19.000]  basically insinuating that because of me they were forced to do all this.
[37:19.000 --> 37:21.000]  Is that a valid complaint?
[37:21.000 --> 37:28.000]  No, it's not. It's a frivolous complaint and definitely should get a bar complaint.
[37:28.000 --> 37:36.000]  Did the fact that he made these claims cost you anything?
[37:36.000 --> 37:38.000]  Did it harm you?
[37:38.000 --> 37:41.000]  Did you get any ruling against you?
[37:41.000 --> 37:44.000]  Well, the property, you know, based on the buyer,
[37:44.000 --> 37:50.000]  I was forced to quit, basically persuaded to withdraw my list of tenants.
[37:50.000 --> 37:53.000]  They may have been able to sell the property to someone else.
[37:53.000 --> 37:56.000]  So it's really gone twice now.
[37:56.000 --> 37:57.000]  So there's no way I can get it back.
[37:57.000 --> 38:00.000]  I can only get damages.
[38:00.000 --> 38:04.000]  And now they're trying to go after attorney's fees.
[38:04.000 --> 38:07.000]  But, you know, that's a lie to the court.
[38:07.000 --> 38:08.000]  Okay. Okay.
[38:08.000 --> 38:13.000]  Then what you might consider doing is they're asking for attorney fees.
[38:13.000 --> 38:17.000]  You might file a counterclaim against the attorneys and sue them,
[38:17.000 --> 38:21.000]  sue the attorneys themselves.
[38:21.000 --> 38:25.000]  They're asking for attorney fees for filing a frivolous pleading.
[38:25.000 --> 38:27.000]  I have a rule.
[38:27.000 --> 38:32.000]  Never interfere with somebody when they're screwing up.
[38:32.000 --> 38:34.000]  You want to, the lawyer want to screw up?
[38:34.000 --> 38:38.000]  Lawyers are especially vulnerable.
[38:38.000 --> 38:42.000]  They don't want you to know that.
[38:42.000 --> 38:46.000]  You file a counterclaim against the lawyers,
[38:46.000 --> 38:54.000]  they have to notify their errors and emissions policies, hold the carrier.
[38:54.000 --> 38:58.000]  And when they notify their errors and emissions carrier,
[38:58.000 --> 39:02.000]  they're going to get their malpractice insurance doubled.
[39:02.000 --> 39:09.000]  If they don't notify their insurance carrier, they don't have any insurance.
[39:09.000 --> 39:12.000]  They have a real problem with insurance.
[39:12.000 --> 39:15.000]  And once you understand that,
[39:15.000 --> 39:25.000]  then you can make it cost them a whole lot more than they could ever imagine getting in attorney fees.
[39:25.000 --> 39:31.000]  And especially if they're doing it for a frivolous pleading.
[39:31.000 --> 39:37.000]  And I've got several attorneys that they awarded attorney fees to the attorney.
[39:37.000 --> 39:40.000]  And the second time he called me about the attorney fees,
[39:40.000 --> 39:43.000]  I told him, Baba, you just knocked yourself out.
[39:43.000 --> 39:46.000]  Let's see if you can get that collected.
[39:46.000 --> 39:48.000]  We'll have a great fun with that.
[39:48.000 --> 39:50.000]  And I never heard from him again.
[39:50.000 --> 39:55.000]  So even if they got it, it's hard for them to collect it.
[39:55.000 --> 39:58.000]  Well, one of the other things they've been saying in the court papers,
[39:58.000 --> 40:02.000]  both attorneys, both for the bank and the property purchaser,
[40:02.000 --> 40:15.000]  is that I did not and could not possibly have tendered the amount due, which is a flat out lie.
[40:15.000 --> 40:18.000]  Hold on, hold on.
[40:18.000 --> 40:22.000]  Why do they mention tender?
[40:22.000 --> 40:26.000]  Because they say that in order to abort my complaint,
[40:26.000 --> 40:31.000]  because I'm assuming that I had to have tendered valid legal amount,
[40:31.000 --> 40:37.000]  the full amount due, in order to bring that complaint to overturnable closure.
[40:37.000 --> 40:44.000]  Well, and they're saying that the tender, well, one side saying I never did tender,
[40:44.000 --> 40:47.000]  which they have no knowledge about, that's hearsay.
[40:47.000 --> 40:49.000]  They didn't see the tender.
[40:49.000 --> 40:58.000]  And I say that submitting a full price offer based on the amount that the notice
[40:58.000 --> 41:03.000]  of trustee's sale said was the total due in owing,
[41:03.000 --> 41:06.000]  which I don't know where they pulled the figure from, but, you know, I said,
[41:06.000 --> 41:09.000]  okay, they pulled that figure out their butthole,
[41:09.000 --> 41:15.000]  and they put it on a publicly recorded document and sent me 97 copies of it in one day.
[41:15.000 --> 41:21.000]  So I arranged for a private lender to submit an offer to purchase the property,
[41:21.000 --> 41:28.000]  because they were then going to refinance it to me at a fair rate to allow me to keep the property.
[41:28.000 --> 41:34.000]  And so we submitted it through a broker to the actual bank's headquarters,
[41:34.000 --> 41:38.000]  and they just turned around three weeks later and said, well,
[41:38.000 --> 41:42.000]  it's too late to foreclose a sale, so we're not going to accept a short sale.
[41:42.000 --> 41:47.000]  Technically, it wasn't a short sale, because they put, I owed $365,740.
[41:47.000 --> 41:52.000]  The offer said, here's three, we'll offer $366,000, including, you know,
[41:52.000 --> 41:53.000]  interest for closing in 10 days.
[41:53.000 --> 41:55.000]  Okay, okay, hold on.
[41:55.000 --> 41:58.000]  Did you sue them for that?
[41:58.000 --> 42:02.000]  Well, that's what I've been trying to get through, and the judges aren't even seeing it.
[42:02.000 --> 42:04.000]  They don't seem to care.
[42:04.000 --> 42:05.000]  You don't, okay, hold on.
[42:05.000 --> 42:09.000]  You don't care what the jerk judges do.
[42:09.000 --> 42:15.000]  Never, you will never win your case in the trial court.
[42:15.000 --> 42:22.000]  Your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal.
[42:22.000 --> 42:28.000]  Once you've got that firmly in mind, then you no longer get upset because the judges are corrupt.
[42:28.000 --> 42:31.000]  They've been bought and paid for.
[42:31.000 --> 42:36.000]  Your only purpose is to set the record for appeal.
[42:36.000 --> 42:42.000]  Once you have that firmly in mind and that's all you're there to do, they will recognize it.
[42:42.000 --> 42:44.000]  And then they'll know they have a bigger problem.
[42:44.000 --> 42:48.000]  If you're going to win your case, you're going to win it in the appeals court.
[42:48.000 --> 42:50.000]  That's always how it is.
[42:50.000 --> 42:58.000]  So as long as you're getting the facts and the law on the record, you don't care what the judge rules.
[42:58.000 --> 43:00.000]  Okay.
[43:00.000 --> 43:03.000]  Your case is complex.
[43:03.000 --> 43:04.000]  It is complex.
[43:04.000 --> 43:07.000]  Send me an email offline.
[43:07.000 --> 43:13.000]  There are some things I would like to address with you that would take too long here on the air.
[43:13.000 --> 43:14.000]  Yes.
[43:14.000 --> 43:25.000]  Send me an email to Randy at ruleoflawradio.com and we'll talk off the air and I'll give you some things to look at.
[43:25.000 --> 43:29.000]  Yeah, because I'm madder than hell and I'm not giving up.
[43:29.000 --> 43:32.000]  They expect me to give up, but I'm not.
[43:32.000 --> 43:39.000]  Okay. I will show you how to get mean and get down and dirty and get after them.
[43:39.000 --> 43:41.000]  Good for you. I'm ready.
[43:41.000 --> 43:43.000]  Okay. Send me an email.
[43:43.000 --> 43:46.000]  We'll talk off the air and we're about to go to break.
[43:46.000 --> 43:49.000]  As soon as you come back, Scott, we'll take you.
[43:49.000 --> 43:53.000]  Tina, listen live on the Internet.
[43:53.000 --> 43:55.000]  Listen to Scott.
[43:55.000 --> 43:57.000]  He has really been hammering these guys.
[43:57.000 --> 44:02.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:02.000 --> 44:30.000]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come buy our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas.
[44:30.000 --> 44:37.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.000 --> 44:43.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.000 --> 45:01.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:15.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.000 --> 46:33.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:33.000 --> 46:38.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to Scott in Texas.
[46:38.000 --> 46:40.000]  Hello, Scott.
[46:40.000 --> 46:42.000]  Howdy, howdy.
[46:42.000 --> 46:43.000]  All righty.
[46:43.000 --> 46:46.000]  What do you have for us today?
[46:46.000 --> 46:56.000]  Well, I would like to go back and kind of rewind back from last week and talk about the Brady List because the show kind of fell apart and everything.
[46:56.000 --> 47:04.000]  And I can refresh some people what had happened because last week was a really good week.
[47:04.000 --> 47:06.000]  Oh, good.
[47:06.000 --> 47:22.000]  Okay, I have the Thomas, what is it? I've got the statute up here if I can find it. The Michael Morton Act.
[47:22.000 --> 47:27.000]  Okay, go ahead. We may get to the Michael Morton Act. I've got it up here.
[47:27.000 --> 47:40.000]  Yeah, while you're doing that, I was, I had to go to court over in Lake Dallas. And the attorney, the city attorney had sent a motion to eliminate,
[47:40.000 --> 47:47.000]  trying to get it to where nothing that the officer said could be heard in court or anything.
[47:47.000 --> 48:07.000]  So I objected to that and blah, blah, blah. But what it boiled down to is when it read is basically it said that now comes to state that basically no opening statements
[48:07.000 --> 48:22.000]  and direct cross-examination of any witness, the fact that the witness officer grant has been put on the Brady List by Denton County as a result of facts not relevant to this offense.
[48:22.000 --> 48:32.000]  But the Brady List is also called the Do Not Support List. And what that means according to all the little attorneys around town,
[48:32.000 --> 48:49.000]  they all know this and a Do Not Support List is how it works in their eyes and how everybody should understand it is when an officer in a municipal city is placed on a Brady List
[48:49.000 --> 49:05.000]  by the county DA, they are deemed not a credible witness, but the city, the municipal city will say like Lake Dallas could still hold a court trial,
[49:05.000 --> 49:18.000]  find you guilty, but then when you appeal it to an appeals court, the appeals court judge could not hear that witness because he is not a credible witness case dismissed.
[49:18.000 --> 49:29.000]  So once I figured all that stuff out, I went before the judge. I don't ever call him a judge. I never address him by judge. It's just either ma'am or sir.
[49:29.000 --> 49:52.000]  And told her that, you know, that this is first she granted my objection to their motion in Lemony and then we dismissed or I wasn't going to grant this other motion that I had in.
[49:52.000 --> 49:59.000]  I was going to say on what grounds because, you know, your officer is not a credible witness, can't be heard in an appeals case.
[49:59.000 --> 50:07.000]  That's when the prosecutor, she said, are you planning on appealing this case? I said, not yet.
[50:07.000 --> 50:13.000]  But I said, if the judge is going to rule against me, you're going to rule against me. We have a trial and they rule against me.
[50:13.000 --> 50:25.000]  So then all I got to do is appeal it, go to appeals court and the officer can't be heard as a credible witness in case dismissed because he's on the Brady List and a do not support list.
[50:25.000 --> 50:36.000]  She looked immediately over at the judge and said in the interest of justice, case dismissed. Granted, out of there I was. Boom. I mean quicker than snot.
[50:36.000 --> 50:45.000]  So that's how the gist of the Brady List works out. And then Thursday, I had to double whammy.
[50:45.000 --> 50:53.000]  I had two in one week. So that was Monday. And then Thursday, I got to Rockwall. I was in and out of Rockwall so fast.
[50:53.000 --> 51:01.000]  I mean, it was like a revolving door. I hit in before my butt hit the chair. I was up, down, sign, gone.
[51:01.000 --> 51:09.000]  I mean, before they even scheduled court to be heard, I was already gone out the door and on the road.
[51:09.000 --> 51:17.000]  Okay. But this brings an issue. Why did you go to Rockwall?
[51:17.000 --> 51:30.000]  Rockwall, you know, they're just basically resetting it because I have a Title 42 on them and they are in default and I wasn't filed.
[51:30.000 --> 51:38.000]  Okay. They ordered you to come to court and then they didn't hold court. Is that correct?
[51:38.000 --> 51:42.000]  It was just a reset. It was a reset. Yeah.
[51:42.000 --> 51:49.000]  Was there a motion for continuance filed?
[51:49.000 --> 51:51.000]  By them?
[51:51.000 --> 51:53.000]  Yes.
[51:53.000 --> 51:58.000]  I have no idea if they filed anything. They probably didn't.
[51:58.000 --> 52:09.000]  You need to file a criminal complaint against the judge for abuse of process.
[52:09.000 --> 52:13.000]  This is what these guys do. You get a ticket.
[52:13.000 --> 52:23.000]  Wait, wait, wait. So who would be in charge? Would it be the prosecutor, the DA that's got to file for the motion for continuance?
[52:23.000 --> 52:34.000]  I know it would be the judge who has to grant it. It was the judge who ordered you to be in court, not the prosecutor.
[52:34.000 --> 52:36.000]  Okay.
[52:36.000 --> 52:44.000]  So the judge ordered you to come to court just to cause you to have to lose a day of work and spend time down at the court.
[52:44.000 --> 52:49.000]  Then he sends you home. And then next month he calls you back again. Then he sends you home.
[52:49.000 --> 52:57.000]  He keeps hammering you until one time you had enough of this, you don't show up. Then they issue warrants that collect your money.
[52:57.000 --> 53:11.000]  Each time the judge issues a subpoena or issues an order for you to appear in court and you appear and they don't have trial, you filed abuse of process on him.
[53:11.000 --> 53:17.000]  Oh, that's golden. I filed so many judicial conducts on him.
[53:17.000 --> 53:22.000]  So abuse of process is a crime in the state of Texas.
[53:22.000 --> 53:31.000]  Oh, he's committed several crimes and I attach all my criminal complaints to the judicial conduct complaint form and submit it all.
[53:31.000 --> 53:37.000]  And it's like, here you go, take that little tar baby and y'all go wrestle with it.
[53:37.000 --> 53:50.000]  Well, you need to start filing them with sending them to the local grand jury. That's Dallas County. Because when the district attorney intercepts the complaint
[53:50.000 --> 53:55.000]  and doesn't get it to the grand jury, now you've got complaints against the district attorney.
[53:55.000 --> 54:02.000]  And when you start hammering the district attorney with one criminal complaint after another against these judges,
[54:02.000 --> 54:11.000]  and then you go after the district attorney for shielding the judge from prosecution, the district attorney is going to get real irritated with that.
[54:11.000 --> 54:18.000]  But he can't say anything to you about it. If he does, that's witness tampering, obstruction of justice.
[54:18.000 --> 54:24.000]  So the only one he can land on is that municipal judge.
[54:24.000 --> 54:33.000]  I've filed on everybody over there, every judicial conduct, bar grief, everybody from hell to back.
[54:33.000 --> 54:41.000]  And Rockwell is a little county, so it's a small little county. So, you know, they hold everything over there. It's not like going over there.
[54:41.000 --> 54:46.000]  Oh, so you're not in Dallas County. So you've got a local grand jury.
[54:46.000 --> 54:48.000]  Well.
[54:48.000 --> 54:52.000]  You've got one you may actually be able to get to.
[54:52.000 --> 55:00.000]  Rockwell is this Rockwell County, isn't it?
[55:00.000 --> 55:02.000]  Yeah.
[55:02.000 --> 55:05.000]  So they got a grand jury.
[55:05.000 --> 55:10.000]  Oh, yeah. But those those people over there, they are no man.
[55:10.000 --> 55:15.000]  No, no, no, no. Do not do that.
[55:15.000 --> 55:27.000]  There are they are ordinary people like you. And I guarantee you, prosecutors are terrified of grand juries.
[55:27.000 --> 55:32.000]  They hear all this nonsense about prosecutors controlling grand juries.
[55:32.000 --> 55:35.000]  They don't do any such thing.
[55:35.000 --> 55:37.000]  Did you hear the beginning of the show?
[55:37.000 --> 55:40.000]  Oh, yeah.
[55:40.000 --> 55:44.000]  I may have got the district judge.
[55:44.000 --> 56:02.000]  I filed the most nitpicking technical criminal accusation I could come up with against the district judge for first degree felony aggravated assault, the most outrageous charge I could find.
[56:02.000 --> 56:04.000]  I may have got it.
[56:04.000 --> 56:14.000]  Because I called the district attorney's office to get Thursday was the day the grand jury met.
[56:14.000 --> 56:20.000]  And instead of his clerk telling me that the jury came back with a no bill.
[56:20.000 --> 56:28.000]  She told me that the prosecutor would talk to me about it Monday.
[56:28.000 --> 56:35.000]  Oh, whoa. What does that mean?
[56:35.000 --> 56:40.000]  He did not tell me we got a no bill.
[56:40.000 --> 56:43.000]  I may actually have gotten them.
[56:43.000 --> 56:49.000]  And if that's the case, everybody in Texas is going to know about it.
[56:49.000 --> 56:54.000]  That's going to scare everybody.
[56:54.000 --> 57:00.000]  I've got Rockwall right now defaulted in a Title 42 civil lawsuit.
[57:00.000 --> 57:08.000]  And today I just went down and filed all the default paperwork with the federal courthouse.
[57:08.000 --> 57:12.000]  And so now the judge has it.
[57:12.000 --> 57:16.000]  They'll notify the other side that they're in default.
[57:16.000 --> 57:20.000]  They're 75 days in default.
[57:20.000 --> 57:28.000]  And I read the letter from the attorney who said that when you file that,
[57:28.000 --> 57:35.000]  the other side is probably going to come up with an answer and ask the court for an extension of time.
[57:35.000 --> 57:39.000]  And the judge will accept their answer.
[57:39.000 --> 57:44.000]  Well, that's not the end of it because you waited so long.
[57:44.000 --> 57:49.000]  They can't claim honest mistake or excusable error.
[57:49.000 --> 57:59.000]  I wrote that into my stuff, too, into my paperwork because that's part of the defenses that they would use.
[57:59.000 --> 58:03.000]  Yeah. You don't care what the trial court does.
[58:03.000 --> 58:06.000]  Let them bring in their answer.
[58:06.000 --> 58:11.000]  When you get to the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals,
[58:11.000 --> 58:18.000]  for them to say that someone can answer 75 days late without good cause,
[58:18.000 --> 58:23.000]  they'll change 200 years of law.
[58:23.000 --> 58:26.000]  And they're not going to want to do that.
[58:26.000 --> 58:34.000]  If they rule against you, then nobody has to answer their lawsuits anymore.
[58:34.000 --> 58:36.000]  So you're in a good spot.
[58:36.000 --> 58:38.000]  Okay. Hang on. About to go to break.
[58:38.000 --> 58:41.000]  Randy Kelson, Rule of Law Radio.
[58:41.000 --> 58:45.000]  I'll call you at number 512-646-1984.
[58:45.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[59:15.000 --> 59:20.000]  We'll be right back.
[59:45.000 --> 59:50.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:29.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 14th of December, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,143.78 an ounce, silver at $16.79 an ounce,
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:42.000]  Texas crude at $52.98 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $778 U.S. currency.
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  Today in history, the year 1958, the Third Soviet Antarctic Expedition becomes the first to reach the southern pole of inaccessibility,
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  the area calculated to be the furthest on the continent from the shoreline.
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  It lies about 546 miles from the actual south pole, an elevation of over 12,000 feet today in history.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  In recent years, for only the second time in a decade, the Federal Reserve will be raising interest rates.
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  The Federal Reserve's interest rates setting committee said Wednesday today that it would raise interest rates by a quarter percentage point,
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  that is between the 0.5, which it's currently at, up to 0.75.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  The Fed statement did say that, quote, the committee expects the economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  in the federal funds rate, and that the federal funds rate is likely to remain for some time below levels that are expected to prevail in the long run.
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  The Obama administration blocked states from cutting off federal grants to Planned Parenthood today.
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:54.000]  Wednesday, the executive rule stipulates that states may not prohibit an organization from participating in Title X,
[01:01:54.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  the state federal program that gives out tens of millions of dollars for family planning for any reason other than the organization's ability to provide services.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  However, President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to support efforts to cut off public funding for Planned Parenthood so long as they continue to offer abortions.
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  He has also nominated as his Health and Human Services Secretary, Representative Tom Price, who has also supported measures to defund Planned Parenthood,
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  and Vice President-elect Indiana Governor Mike Pence is completely in favor of cutting off the group's taxpayer support.
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  So we'll have to see if this executive rule will be overturned.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  Abdul Salam Abdul Razak, a military spokesperson for the Naur al-Din al-Zinki Syrian rebel group,
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  told Reuters today that within hours the implementation of an evacuation agreement for Aleppo will begin.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  The deal included the evacuation of people from the villages of Faoua and Kefraya.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  Some 50,000 people, including militants and their families and whoever wants to leave among civilians, will be headed for the province of Idlib.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:18.000]  This was Luke Rodeo with the Lowdown for December 14, 2016.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  OK, we are back.
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:44.000]  Randy Kelton, we're talking to Scott in Texas.
[01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  OK, go ahead, Scott.
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  Well, like I say, I got them in default now and just going to be waiting on the judge to make a determination in however many days.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  I figure it'll probably drag out about 90 days, my best guess.
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:11.000]  And then it's going to have to come to a head then.
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  And then once I get a default, then it's like, OK, now what?
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:25.000]  Now you go to court and determine how much they have to pay you.
[01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:33.000]  Oh, I've already got that wrote up in all the paperwork and everything and a set amount because I got it set for.
[01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  No, you're going to have to go into court and prove it up.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:43.000]  They're going to object to the amount and you're going to have to show the court why they should grant you that amount.
[01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  The case is default, but the amount is not.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  You say that again?
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  The case itself, you win the case by default, but you don't win the amount by default.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  Now we have to go back and the court, you have a hearing and the court determines how much you get.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  They're going to object to the amount that you requested.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:23.000]  You're going to show why you should get that amount and the judge is going to make a determination.
[01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  Now it was based on Trezevant and it wasn't on the proper current inflation rate because if you use Trezevant and today's inflation rate,
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  it's basically equals out to five point two million dollars a day now instead of three point something, three point five.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  So it's like five million bucks a day.
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  All you have to have is a calculation and show how you got that calculation.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  And the other guy is going to say, well, that's a crappy calculation.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  He shouldn't have calculated by that.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  He should have calculated by 50 cents a day.
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  Right.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  And then the judge will make a determination.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  But if you do get the default judgment and you go to the trial to determine how much, make sure you do a lot of research on who has filed similar suits,
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:34.000]  one at default and what kind of judgments they have received from the courts.
[01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  So you'll have a way to base the value.
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  You're really going after due process.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  And the question is, what are your rights worth?
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  My rights are extremely valuable because I paid big time for my rights.
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  So for them to come to me and say, well, how do you justify this much?
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  I'm going to say, where were you November 17th, 1970?
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  I can tell you where I was.
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  I was paid for these rights.
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  I was standing in Thurfield Hospital, Saigon, South Vietnam.
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  I paid for these.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:22.000]  These are mine.
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:24.000]  And they're very valuable to me.
[01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:33.000]  You've got to find a way of showing the court why these rights are valuable to you.
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:38.000]  It doesn't matter what the value is to somebody else.
[01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:42.000]  You've got to show them why it's valuable to you.
[01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:44.000]  But that's the fun part.
[01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  If that's the worst part you have to do, oh, that's going to be great fun.
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  Okay.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:56.000]  Do you have anything else for us?
[01:07:56.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  Well, I guess not.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  Everybody keep up the good work.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:04.000]  Yeah.
[01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  So everybody just keep fighting.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  And if anybody wants to, I've actually live-streamed this conversation.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  So this will be interesting.
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:20.000]  So if anybody ever wants to hear you, go to the Snafu Radio on YouTube,
[01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:25.000]  and you can hear this again as well as the archives with y'all.
[01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  Yeah, this is great because, like I say, I've got some pretty good stuff on there too.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  But other than that, have a good evening.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  Were you doing selfish self-promotion?
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  I just did one.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:45.000]  Yeah, we encourage selfish self-promotion.
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  Okay.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  Thank you, Scott.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  Yeah, if anybody wants to email me, you can email me too.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  And I'll send you some good stuff on the right to travel, what I'm doing too.
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  So I know because I know what you said last week is like you have a license and stuff like that.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  But for a lot of people that had their license taken away by the state, they don't have a choice.
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:15.000]  They have to learn how to deal with this stuff because they don't have a license.
[01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  Exactly.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  The state has beat a lot of people up and they're taking a lot of people to jail over something that is completely not right.
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  It's illegal basically, everything that they're doing.
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:34.000]  So, absolute Fourth Amendment warrant.
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:36.000]  There we go, folks.
[01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  Good.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:38.000]  Stay after them.
[01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  Okay.
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  Thank you, Scott.
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  Now we're going to go to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:45.000]  Hello, Olivier.
[01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  Hello.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  You're on.
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:51.000]  Can you hear me?
[01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  We can hear you.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  Hello.
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  All right.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  I'm trying to make it quick so I know people calling.
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  I got a few issues, but the most pertinent one is Friday.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  What does Friday say?
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:04.000]  Friday.
[01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  I went and filed a lawsuit for my house.
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  I filed three suit earlier and they dismissed them and I filed appeal and all that stuff.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:18.000]  So, I went to go ahead because you told me to file all of them at once.
[01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  So, now I went to go file this suit for my house in the state court.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  I filed the suit.
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:34.000]  Me and my friend walk out the curtain office, stop by the water fountain, get something to drink, walk out to the parking lot,
[01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:38.000]  get in my car and start my car.
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  I'm about to exit the parking lot.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  When I hear someone knocking on the window, I look up.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  It's a cop up the window.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:49.000]  So, I'm like, are you serious?
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:51.000]  So, I'm like, you know what?
[01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  I can't believe this.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  So, I step out.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  I just get out the car.
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  I'm like, what do you want?
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:57.000]  I turn the car off and get out the car.
[01:10:57.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  What do you want?
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  They're like, well, you have to step out the car.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  I'm like, okay, I'm out the car.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  What do you want?
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  They're like, well, are you making threats?
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  I said, what did you say?
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  He said, you're making threats.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  So, what did you say?
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:17.000]  I said, are you out your mind?
[01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  I said, you come up to me and you ask me if I'm making threats.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:23.000]  I said, do you have a warrant?
[01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:24.000]  Better yet, just put handcuffs on me.
[01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  If I made threats, you already know what I said.
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  And that threats to who?
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  Oh, you're calling the mail office?
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  I'm like, calling the mail.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:37.000]  I didn't even use my phone today.
[01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:40.000]  So, I'm like, what the heck are you talking about?
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  I said, you know what?
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  Go get a warrant because you don't know what you're talking about.
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:47.000]  You're coming up to me asking me questions.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  If I threatened someone, you knew what I said.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  You should be telling me, did I say this, this, and this, or putting handcuffs on me?
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:56.000]  That person feels real threatened in that manner.
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  What are you talking about?
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:11:58.000]  Go get your warrant.
[01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  Well, I just needed your ID.
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:01.000]  I told them, go get your warrant.
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:04.000]  Go get your warrant because we ain't got nothing to talk about.
[01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  I'm like, I'm not giving you nothing.
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:08.000]  My name is Monteser Olivier.
[01:12:08.000 --> 01:12:11.000]  You should know my name.
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  So, I told them, go get the warrant.
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  Then the other cops pulled up, and the other cops go inside the courthouse,
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:23.000]  and the cops got sitting on the ground.
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  Another cop that came that was relative to another situation that we had with my brother
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  that wore the five-suit on, he came up, and as soon as he seen us, he was like,
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  uh-oh, I don't want no part of this.
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:38.000]  He smiled like, hey, Mr. Olivier, how you doing?
[01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  So, it was three cops, three negative cops, and one cop who had experienced me before,
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  and like, no, okay, don't mess with Olivier.
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  So, he's like chit-chatting back and forth with me.
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  So, I'm aggressive with the other cops, and then the other cop come in,
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  and I'm just talking to him like an angel.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:01.000]  So, the other three cops are staring at each other like, what's going on?
[01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:06.000]  How come the fourth cop is not joining in with us?
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  You know, he's buddy-buddy with Mr. Olivier.
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  So, I told him, hey, go get your warrant.
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  I feel threatened, and I'm going to be filing suit on him.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  And they were like, well, we just wanted to talk to you.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  You just want to talk to me.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  I'm like, you arrested me?
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  They're like, well, you're not under arrest.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  I'm like, I'm not under arrest.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  I'm on the ground, which I was in my vehicle, unlawfully.
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  I'm under arrest.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  I said, without crying, without any probable cause for you to do anything,
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  I said, I'm under arrest.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:37.000]  May I leave?
[01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  We just wanted to talk to you.
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  That is retaliation.
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  That's retaliation by definition.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  Let me say this historically, because I need you to get a conclusive
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  so you can give me something accurate so I can go make a move.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  When I talk about something, I like to go make a move and be successful at it.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:00.000]  So, okay, so now I called the chief.
[01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:01.000]  We leave.
[01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  I called the chief.
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:03.000]  I called the sergeant.
[01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  She come and talked to me.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  And she said, she told us that, oh, well, Mr. Olivier, you know, it wasn't like that.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  What happened was someone called 911 and said that someone was acting up in the courtroom.
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  I mean, in the courthouse.
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  They said that you were acting up in the courthouse.
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:24.000]  That's the only reason my officers went over there, Mr. Olivier.
[01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  We're not trying to arrest you.
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  I'm like, no, not like that.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  That made no sense.
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  I'm like, I file lawsuits all the time.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  And I spoke to three women with a witness here.
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  And we didn't have time to get in a conflicting argument.
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  We took a drink of water and walked out of there.
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  How are we being disturbed?
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:47.000]  Have you requested the 911 tapes?
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  Not yet.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:50.000]  You need to do that.
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:51.000]  Okay.
[01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  Well, okay.
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:57.000]  They had some smart mouth cop pull something stupid.
[01:14:57.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  And now they're trying to do damage control.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  My suggestion, anytime you get stopped from this point on,
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  first thing you do is take out your cell phone and dial 911.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:16.000]  First thing.
[01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  I've been doing that.
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  I've been doing that.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  Good, good.
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:27.000]  Then you get the 911 tape that's recorded.
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:30.000]  And you require them to dispatch.
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:32.000]  They either dispatch or they don't.
[01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  If they don't dispatch,
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  then clearly what they're doing is harassment and retaliation.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  If they do dispatch, now you've got an officer there who has come to answer
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  your complaint and then you make accusations against the other officer.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  And it really makes a mess for them.
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:53.000]  I've done this already.
[01:15:53.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  You remember when I had the young lady, when I stopped to check on the young lady,
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  then they arrested me.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  I called 911.
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  They charged me with calling 911.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  I beat the charge and I beat the arrest.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:08.000]  And have you sued them for that?
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  Yeah, I'm in court for that.
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:12.000]  Yeah, I'm in court for that.
[01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:15.000]  You're kind of like Scott.
[01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  You know, they came after Scott and they harassed him and he went back after him
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:21.000]  and they came back after him.
[01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:23.000]  And finally they had enough.
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:25.000]  They began to back up and leave him alone.
[01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:29.000]  They're going to do the same thing to you.
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  But they find out that they're not going to be able to get you to do their song
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  and dance for them.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  That everything they do to you turns out badly for them.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  They're going to cut this stuff out.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  But that's not the worst of it.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  Oh, wait a minute.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  Hold on.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  We're about to go to break.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  We'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  Randy Kelton, we have a radio, a call-in number, 512-646-1984.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  I love Logos.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:07.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:08.000]  I need my truth fix.
[01:17:08.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:16.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite
[01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:22.000]  How can I help Logos?
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:29.000]  with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:31.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:38.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:41.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link
[01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  No.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  No.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  No.
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  This is perfect.
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  You're welcome.
[01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors
[01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  and now you can win too.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail,
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:45.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:50.000]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:58.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:20.000]  Okay.
[01:19:20.000 --> 01:19:21.000]  We are back.
[01:19:21.000 --> 01:19:26.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:27.000]  Okay.
[01:19:27.000 --> 01:19:29.000]  You were getting to the worst part.
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:30.000]  Hi.
[01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  Okay.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:32.000]  So I got the information from her.
[01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  I got the officer's name.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  I wrote to her.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  I filed two cases, two out of the three that I filed that they could be dismissed.
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:49.000]  I filed them in the federal court.
[01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  So I'm waiting for them to send me my paperwork back.
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  I went to go pick up.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  I filed a case, but I had to go pick up the paperwork back
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  that they couldn't assign me a case number.
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:07.000]  I came back Monday or Tuesday for that paperwork, and the clerks told me that,
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  well, they couldn't give me a case number because the judge won't allow me to proceed
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  on indigency status until I pay up my court costs.
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  Can he charge court costs when you have shown inability to pay?
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  What did you say?
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:47.000]  We had that issue here in Tarrant County where the district clerk tried to require
[01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  that an indigent person pay court costs, and the court of appeals hammered him,
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  the district clerk, big time.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  Is there a provision in Tennessee law that allows the court to assess court costs
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  to an indigent person?
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:13.000]  No.
[01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  Then that's easy.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  Just petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus.
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  Mandamus, you ask a higher court to mandate to a lower court that the lower court
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  do what the law requires the court to do.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:41.000]  So I can't sue the judge because of that?
[01:21:41.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  Yes.
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  If the law is in your favor and he does not have discretion to do that,
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  then absolutely.
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  In the civil code of procedure, in the indigency process, the only authority he has
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  is to award it or deny it on certain standards, that's it.
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  And those standards don't include that the defendant or whoever it is,
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  the pro se, pay prior fees.
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  You might consider a code, sending a complaint to the U.S. attorney
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  because the judge denied you in your right to petition the court for redress
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  or grievance.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  That's state as well as federal.
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  And when you send it to the U.S. attorney, then if he doesn't send it to the
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  attorney general under 28 U.S.C. 535, then you file against the U.S. attorney
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:23:05.000]  and he is not going to be happy because he has to submit his resignation to Trump.
[01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  You might consider that, but this is criminal.
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:15.000]  If the law does not allow him to do that, it's an act beyond the scope outside
[01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  of his subject matter jurisdiction for which he can be sued personally
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  and it's a criminal act.
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  So I can sue him in the feds?
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:28.000]  You can sue him in the feds.
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  42 U.S. Code 1983.
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  And this is pretty straightforward, procedural due process.
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  1983, how about the 242 and 241?
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  That's criminal.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  That's the criminal complaint.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:50.000]  18 U.S. Code 241, 42, that's the criminal side of the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  The civil side of the Ku Klux Klan Act is 42 U.S. Code 1983.
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  That's the one where you can sue them.
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  And if the judge exerted or purported to exert an authority he does not
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  expressly have that outside scope and he has no immunity.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  So I need to sue him underneath 1983.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Yes, that will jerk a knot in his shorts.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  It sometimes takes them a while to realize that they got a hold of somebody
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  who's not going to duck and run for cover.
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  That every time they do something stupid it gets worse for them.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  And it takes them a while to get that figured out.
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:50.000]  And this judge, when you put him in a position to where he has to explain
[01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  to a federal judge why he's jerking you around in a state court,
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  that is going to get his attention.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  And potentially to a federal grand jury.
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  Okay, now give me a minute.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:16.000]  I have a complaint and the complaint comes from the complaint form that they have
[01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  or something that I have to see.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  Have I sent, I have a fill-in-the-blank federal complaint form.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  Have I sent you that?
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  No.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  Send me an email and ask for it.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  I'll send it to you.
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  It's a PDF fill-in-the-blanks.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:43.000]  And that's under 242, 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:46.000]  That's the criminal side.
[01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  Then at the same time you can do the criminal and the civil at the same time.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  They don't like it when you do both,
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  but you don't really care what they like and what they don't like.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:09.000]  The civil is a whole separate issue from the criminal.
[01:26:09.000 --> 01:26:12.000]  So I think I wrote up my other complaints wrong there
[01:26:12.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  because I don't think I wrote up 1983.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  Okay, the complaint is not 1983.
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  That's a suit.
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  That's where you sue them civilly.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  18 U.S. Code 242 is the criminal statute.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  Title 18 are the criminal statutes.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  So that's, you file a criminal accusation with the FBI or with the U.S. attorney.
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:48.000]  That's separate from a civil lawsuit against them.
[01:26:48.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  In a criminal complaint, you're only a witness.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  You only give notice that you have reason to believe that a crime has been committed.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  You have no standing in that case.
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  You simply give notice.
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  The civil side, you have standing.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  That's a separate issue.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  Okay.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  So they're not connected.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  They're only connected by facts.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  They're not connected by jurisdictions.
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:18.000]  What are the statutes for the civil side?
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  I wrote a complaint.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:23.000]  I wrote up my complaint, but I think I wrote the wrong statutes.
[01:27:23.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  I think I wrote criminal statutes.
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  It says what violations occurred.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  Well, okay, if you accuse the judge or whoever you wrote a complaint against of committing a crime against you,
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  then that will support a tort.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  When you file a 42 U.S. Code 1983 suit, you don't have to call it a 42 U.S. Code 1983 suit.
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:27:59.000]  You just file a civil suit against the judge.
[01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  And the courts will say, oh, that's a 42 U.S. Code 1983 suit.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  That's the statute that gives you authority to file it.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:15.000]  You don't have to cite that for that statute to have effect.
[01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:28.000]  If you file a suit that makes a claim against a public official that falls within 42 U.S. Code 1983, it's a valid complaint.
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  Whether you say 42 U.S. Code or not, if you accuse a public official of committing a federal crime against you and harming you as a result,
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  that's a 42 U.S. Code 1983 suit.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  So you're okay.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:44.000]  I got you.
[01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  I got you.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  You know what?
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  I think I wrote it.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  Then I went and did my research again.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:57.000]  Then I found the error and I went back and corrected it because I do remember seeing it in 1981, 1982, and 1983.
[01:28:57.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  And I corrected it.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  Okay.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  I got you.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  Okay.
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:05.000]  So you would be okay in either case.
[01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  The rule is it doesn't matter what you call your action.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  Name it anything you want to.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  Don't make any difference.
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  It is what it is.
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  What the document is goes to the substance of the document, not what you call it.
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  Okay.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:37.000]  I got to tell you that when I went up to the federal court and filled out my document, the clerk was very interested in seeing me up there.
[01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  It was like, you know, after she went over the paperwork, she was very surprised how everything was put together.
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  They're always surprised when a pro se is actually literate.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  They like to assume that we're all totally stupid and easy to roll over.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:29:59.000]  It's very good for them to get up.
[01:29:59.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  Hey, what's that smell?
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:08.000]  In the not too distant future, you might actually reply, that's my perfume pill.
[01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:13.000]  Yes, pills, not spray bottles, may soon be the way we apply scent in the future.
[01:30:13.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll have details in a moment.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:29.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  When I see someone covered in sweat, I do my nose a favor and steer clear.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  But someday, sniffing someone's sweat might be as sweet as a spritz of cologne.
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:58.000]  That is, if Lucy McRae's invention pans out.
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  McRae, a 31-year-old artist, is working with Dutch chemists on a pill you could swallow to turn your perspiration into cologne.
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  Packing beauty products into pills isn't new.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  Some pills provide sun protection, and L'Oreal is working on a supplement to keep your hair from turning gray.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  McRae says her perfume pill will smell unique on each individual who uses it.
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  But internal perfume? Hmm.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:25.000]  I'm not sure that idea passes my sniff test.
[01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:08.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Out of town roofers come knockin', your door should be lockin'.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:00.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:04.000]  Me and I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  If you're looking for some truth, you found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:32.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:35.000]  I'm back from falling off the cliff again.
[01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  We have a little bit of a technical difficulty,
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  and my producer can't tell me when I'm about to run off the cliff.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  So I'm not being coddled.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  I have to pay attention to these things myself, and I'm screwed it up every time.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  Okay, where were we, Oliver, when I ran off the cliff?
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:33:57.000]  Okay.
[01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  You were just telling me that they like to see a prostitute who's got the word that she used.
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:08.000]  Literate, who knows what he's doing.
[01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:11.000]  And yeah, I've had that experience with clerks.
[01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  The federal clerks tend, well, all the clerks, I seldom ever have a problem with a clerk.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:23.000]  The clerks don't have a dog in the hut.
[01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  And if you treat them with dignity and respect, they do the same thing.
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  And very seldom I've ever had a problem with a clerk.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  And the federal clerks are specifically required by statute to assist prostitute litigants.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  It's in the code.
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  While a state clerk may not be able to give legal advice, a federal clerk can,
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:59.000]  or at least to the operations of their office.
[01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  So they're generally really easy to get along with.
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  Always make friends with the clerk.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  They can be incredibly helpful.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  Okay.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  Now, let me finish the story.
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:17.000]  I got a sentence for this trial that they fumbled through, and it's going to be,
[01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  they're moving this judge to be the sentencing judge.
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  Now, can I file, did they have 21 days to answer?
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  So I said, wouldn't that be quicker than doing the appeal?
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  Because now he has heat on his table.
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  And then I could refile my case with him and all the other judges in there
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  knowing that I'm not playing.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  The next person who tries this is going to get one of those lawsuits.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  Would that clear the picture up?
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  I'm not sure how that's going to work.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  I know the fact that you file suit against the judge will not disqualify the judge.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  Okay.
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  That's, and that's reasonable.
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  Because if you have a judge you don't like, all you got to do is file a suit.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:13.000]  Good suit, bad suit, heck, it don't matter.
[01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  You file a suit against the judge, and then you get rid of the judge and get a new one.
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  So the courts have put the kibosh on that.
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  If you're in a criminal case and you sue the judge in the criminal case,
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  it does not affect his standing.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  So whatever they do, you get to appeal it.
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  So it's not a done deal.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  I sue him for action that he committed in the civil case.
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  Now they're moving him to the criminal side.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:49.000]  That's a different, wait, wait, hold on, hold on.
[01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  That's a different issue.
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:56.000]  You didn't sue him for something he did in the criminal case?
[01:36:56.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  No, he wouldn't let me file civilly because I guess if they realize that I'm going to run a lot of lawsuits on them,
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:06.000]  and I guess they're trying to stop him.
[01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  They're trying to stop me.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  Okay, that's grounds to disqualify.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  He wrote that I cannot file any more suits until I pay all court costs.
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  I'm going to pay court costs if I'm an indigent.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  Exactly.
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:28.000]  Okay, hold on.
[01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  Is that what you sued him for?
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  That's what I plan on suing him for.
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  Okay, that has nothing to do with the criminal case.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  No.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  So once you sue him outside the criminal case, now he has an interest.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  That should disqualify him.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  Okay, so once I file the suit, I serve him, and then on the 6th of January, automatically disqualify him off the bench.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:06.000]  Absolutely.
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  That's what I worked up in my head, but I wanted to run it through you because I know this is what you go through.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  So take care of the judge, wrap your hands up, file my motions, new trial motions, and am I missing something?
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  Okay, why are you going through it?
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  You know, I'm in a small county here in North Texas, and I have filed criminal charges against the judge here.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  If I get criminal charges filed against me, the criminal charges I filed against the judge have nothing to do with criminal charges,
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  say somebody else files charges against me.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:06.000]  This judge cannot sit in the case because he has a separate interest that would unnecessarily prejudice him against me.
[01:39:06.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  If this judge is in a civil case where you're suing him and you're already opposing litigants in a case,
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  that would necessarily prejudice him against you, and that should game off the case.
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  Okay, gotcha, gotcha. All right.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  Now, earlier, you were trying to push me to take these judges to federal court, but I didn't understand the process.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  But now that I'm understanding the process, and I clearly understand what you just told me about Judge Hicks.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:45.000]  Now, I had other judges that unlawfully dismissed my habeas corpus.
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  Now, would I have to get that habeas corpus turned over before I file suit?
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  You cannot sue them, period.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  It says that unlawful denial of habeas corpus in the statute is a suit at law and a misdemeanor.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  Okay, that's a special, okay.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:18.000]  In most places, you can never sue a judge for the ruling that he makes if he is within the scope of his authority.
[01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  In Tennessee, it sounds like you have a special statute that renders a judge civilly reliable.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  So I would say if that's what the statute says, absolutely, you can sue him.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  Okay, and which court should I sue him in federal?
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  Wait, here's the thing, though.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  Do I have to prove that another court has to overturn the habeas corpus, or can I just sue them as soon as they make their legal ruling?
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  Soon as they make the illegal ruling.
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  So I don't have to get another court to say that it was illegal?
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:40:57.000]  No, not that I know of.
[01:40:57.000 --> 01:41:07.000]  If you would show in the court where you have filed the suit, you would have to prove up that it was illegal.
[01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  Yeah, because I understand the documentation.
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  Yeah, whoa, that's giving me a lot of fun.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  You underestimated when you said this is going to be a lot of fun, especially at night.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  They took all my cards in my house and everything, and everybody was kind of like supporting me because of the issue.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  So it kind of set me free just to sit here and write a suit all day, all day.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  And my baby brother's saying before my trip is to go back and forth to Nashville, which is our way to go to the court.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:37.000]  So I'm free to ravage him.
[01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  Good.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:40.000]  That's what we need.
[01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:48.000]  They need my intended ultimate outcome in all that I do.
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  It is my purpose to place every judge in the country in a position such that when they step up behind the bench and look out across the bar at the gallery,
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:06.000]  I want them wondering which one, which one of those scoundrels out there is another Olivier?
[01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:10.000]  Which one is going to crawl right down my throat?
[01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  When we get the judge looking out at the gallery, wondering which one of those guys, those pro se, know nothing, is going to hammer him big time, then we'll get justice.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  So long as they feel they can do anything they want to, we will have anarchy.
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  So you are the reason I do this show.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:38.000]  We get one of you in every county.
[01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:46.000]  Ninety percent of the problems with the courts we've been having will simply go away.
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:49.000]  So good work, Olivier.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  I got two more short questions.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:53.000]  Okay.
[01:42:53.000 --> 01:43:08.000]  How many do you think, because I have like at least 10 to 15 separate issues that I can file, how many do you think is reasonable to file at once in the federal?
[01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  Because I don't really have any other obligations besides tending to this matter.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  Everybody wants to tend to this matter.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  That's a hard question, something that comes up often, where you have case after case after case coming up.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  This will probably wind up going to a WICO and a Joinder.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:41.000]  Hang on, I think I hear the music.
[01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  Yeah, I do.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  Hang on, about to go to break.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  Randy Cup.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  Hang on, Olivier.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  We'll finish this up on the other side.
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  Call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:02.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:44:02.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:17.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:22.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:27.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:48.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.000 --> 01:44:57.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Only at HempUSA.org.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:05.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:05.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:20.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:24.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:24.000 --> 01:45:29.000]  Our thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:29.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:30.000]  Okay.
[01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  We are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  Okay, Olivier, we were counting up the federal suits.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  Okay, you had two other issues?
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  I filed two already, and I have at least 8 to 10 more that I can file that already occurred.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:06.000]  And I just was not ready to go down that avenue, but I'm settled down there.
[01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:27.000]  Well, if you're getting it down, you might look at writing the suits in a way so that you can eventually move for a jointer and move all the suits into a RICO suit.
[01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  Wouldn't that make it easier for them?
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  Oh, no.
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:35.000]  RICO is bad news for them.
[01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:36.000]  No.
[01:47:36.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  Okay.
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  It's a matter of what you're able to deal with and what the federal court...
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  The federal court is going to get real excited when you start buying multiple cases because their docket is pretty full.
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  And when you have multiple cases that are arising out of essentially the same nexus, you're in a city in Tennessee,
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  and various entities in this city are giving you cause to file suit against them.
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  The courts are going to want to do a jointer, join them all together so that everybody comes at the same time.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  And all the issues, they may hear a dozen issues, but they hear them all the same day because it's the same players.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:43.000]  Right, right.
[01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:44.000]  Okay.
[01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  They process it at the same time, but the case are still separate.
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  They're still separate, yeah.
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:51.000]  Okay.
[01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  I understand that fact.
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:54.000]  All right.
[01:48:54.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  Racial profiling, the NAACP director is pushing me to push the racial profiling.
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  Okay.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:11.000]  Let me give you fair warning.
[01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  Okay.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  I know you're black, and I know the NAACP is supposed to be to help primarily blacks be careful with these guys.
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:25.000]  They are lawyers.
[01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  They are scoundrels.
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  If you're not real careful, what the feds will do is go to the NAACP and say, you know, we're helping you guys out with funding.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  You want the courts to rule in your favor.
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:43.000]  Get this guy off our case.
[01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:45.000]  And they'll come in.
[01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  They'll take your case, and then they'll do nothing.
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  This is the director.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  I'm just saying they may be great.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  They may do perfect.
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:03.000]  Just always be careful.
[01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:05.000]  No, I understand what you're saying.
[01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  No, he's telling me he can't do anything on the legal side.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:12.000]  He's pushing for them to stop.
[01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  He contacted the chief and told him to stop profiling me and arresting me without cause because he spoke to me and explained it to me.
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  He's telling me that he can't give me legal advice, but this is racial profiling 100 percent.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:34.000]  And me, I don't know how to write up that suit.
[01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  It's not something that he's trying to do or anything, but as I told him what was going on, he made it an issue to contact the chief and say, you're going to leave Mr. Olivier alone.
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  And he's upset that he did not allow me to file a complaint four different times, four different.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:50:58.000]  Now, that, okay, that is good news.
[01:50:58.000 --> 01:50:59.000]  That is wonderful.
[01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:03.000]  He's actually stepping in, in your behalf.
[01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  And what I think of the NAACP, I don't trust them, but that chief of police, he's going to have a whole other opinion on these guys.
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:18.000]  He's going to be afraid of them.
[01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  The last thing he's going to want is them coming after him.
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  So that's wonderful.
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  Right.
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:28.000]  So I got that going.
[01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:42.000]  So my thing is I understand how to write the suit, but this racial profiling, I heard about it all the time, but I know you would be the best person to advise me what information I need to go get and so I can.
[01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:47.000]  It is an area that I have not researched.
[01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  Send me an email on it and I'll do some preliminary research on racial profiling.
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  In the feds, right?
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  Yeah, right.
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  Okay, racial profiling.
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:00.000]  Okay.
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:07.000]  So I'll contact you for the federal criminal complaint and racial profiling.
[01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:13.000]  Will the federal criminal complaint, will it have like some type of instructional?
[01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:14.000]  Yes.
[01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:16.000]  Yes, it has an instruction page.
[01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:17.000]  I believe it does.
[01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:20.000]  But it's really pretty straightforward.
[01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  It's almost the same as the, about the only difference in the federal complaint is a federal complaint is written up like a motion or a pleading.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:40.000]  It has a motion or pleading heading on it, except instead of titled, the motion name is titled complaint.
[01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  Other than that, it's pretty much the same as the complaints you would otherwise file.
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  Okay.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  Thank you, Randy.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  You really set me up.
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:52.000]  Ready to go.
[01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  Okay.
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  Wonderful.
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:52:55.000]  Okay.
[01:52:55.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  Now we're going to go to a public apology I have to make.
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:17.000]  A couple of weeks ago, I had a caller from New York that I generally don't take people on directly, but I did call him a bigot.
[01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:24.000]  And it was, the bigotry was about religious bigotry.
[01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  But I accused him of being banned from the show.
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  And this was Wyatt in New York.
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  And I accused him of having somebody else call in so he could get on the air.
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:45.000]  Well, he sent me a letter and told me that I was mistaken, that he wasn't aware that he was banned from the show.
[01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  And that he hadn't had someone else call in for him.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  And Wyatt, your criticism is well taken.
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:54:07.000]  I seldom take people on directly because it seems like every time I do, it turns out I'm wrong or I could well be wrong.
[01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  So I do seldom do that.
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  Now, Deborah was reluctant to have you on the air because of the way in the past you have spoke to her.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  But then again, Wyatt's from New York.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  And I used to live up north.
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:32.000]  And people talked to one another differently up north than they tend to in the south.
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:42.000]  In the south, we tend to be somewhat less aggressive, especially a male with a female.
[01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  I'm six feet tall, 200 pounds.
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:49.000]  I can power lift about 250.
[01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:51.000]  I can push about 120.
[01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:54.000]  That's not much for a guy my size.
[01:54:54.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  But a woman my size wouldn't be able to come close to that.
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  Guys, our muscles are about three times as dense as a female's.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:13.000]  In the south, for a man to use his strength against a woman is just not acceptable.
[01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  We're not physically or verbally aggressive.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  And it's not as much that way up north.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  I'm trying to find a way to explain this, that I don't think Wyatt Walt intended to be offensive.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  I think it was a cultural difference.
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  And if I was out of line, Walt, I apologize.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:39.000]  It was not my intent.
[01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  It's generally not my style.
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:44.000]  And I'll try to refrain from that in the future.
[01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:51.000]  Okay. With that said, let's go to Chateau in New York.
[01:55:51.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  Did I pronounce that right?
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  No, sir. My name is Chateau, C-H-A-I-O, but it's okay.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:02.000]  A-I-O, okay.
[01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  Chateau, like the girl on TV.
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:10.000]  Okay. A-I-O. I-O?
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  No, C-H-A-R-O, Chateau.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  P-A-C-I-O.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  Yeah.
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  I probably won't get that right.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:25.000]  But I'll work on it.
[01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:26.000]  Okay.
[01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:28.000]  Thank you for taking my call, Randy.
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  Okay. What do you have for us tonight?
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  Okay. I am from Florida.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:40.000]  And I want to apologize because my voice was lost because I was thrown out of my house.
[01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  I become homeless.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:44.000]  That's why I'm in New York.
[01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  I have been trying to be in the show.
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:52.000]  And for some reason, I didn't have any voice.
[01:56:52.000 --> 01:56:54.000]  I could not talk to you before.
[01:56:54.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  I lost it completely due to the foreclosure.
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  I have been...I think I have one of the more horrendous foreclosure cases in Florida.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:12.000]  They fabricated an assignment on mortgage.
[01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:14.000]  They fabricated a note.
[01:57:14.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  And the judge allowed the Bank of JP Morgan Chase to take my property.
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:29.000]  I appealed. I put a federal complaint, and they had denied on the record settlement,
[01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:38.000]  which should not apply because, you know, the only way the record settlement does not apply is on the fraud.
[01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  And they had committed fraud.
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:49.000]  The bankruptcy judge denied my claim because they presented like I said false documents.
[01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  And I am desperate.
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:57.000]  I need a good recall, sample complaint.
[01:57:57.000 --> 01:57:59.000]  And I need your help.
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  I've been dealing with the fraud stoppers in Chicago.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  They are amazing people.
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  And I have a dog friend, lost two paintings.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  But I don't know what to do.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  I was thrown out of my house like a dog.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  Okay.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  I don't know my property.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  And I had to come to New York.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  I am 60 years old.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  I have a racial profile like the other person.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  And I'm an old lady.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  I'm a woman.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:37.000]  And I have been...I'm a senior.
[01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:47.000]  And I have been...I think I have been brutally mistreated.
[01:58:47.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Will you send me an email?
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[01:58:54.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:07.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:22.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:43.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.000 --> 01:59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.