ROL_2016-09-09_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:10.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown. Providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:10.000 --> 00:18.000]  Today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:18.000 --> 00:30.000]  Markets for Labor Day, Monday, the 5th of September, 2016. Closed with gold, $1,326.90 an ounce.
[00:30.000 --> 00:40.000]  Silver, $19.53 an ounce. Texas crude, $44.44 a barrel. And Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 606 U.S. currency.
[00:40.000 --> 00:56.000]  Today in history, the year 1698. In an effort to westernize his nobility, the Tsar of Russia, Peter I, imposes a tax on beards for all men except the clergy and peasantry.
[00:56.000 --> 01:05.000]  Though believe it not, it wasn't the first beard tax in history. Those who did resist the tax on beards were forcibly and publicly shaven. The Tsar beard tax. Today in history.
[01:05.000 --> 01:18.000]  In recent news, the 11th meeting of the Group of 20 or G20 is underway with the 2016 G20 Hangzhou Summit. It will be held on the 4th and 5th of September.
[01:18.000 --> 01:26.000]  It is the first G20 Summit to be hosted in China and the second in an Asian country with the 2010 G20 Seoul Summit in South Korea.
[01:26.000 --> 01:31.000]  Apparently only some vehicles have been allowed through the city. Construction sites were stopped.
[01:31.000 --> 01:42.000]  Inhabitants received a week-long holiday being encouraged to leave the city for the week and hundreds of factories in the region were asked to stop their production all in a last-minute effort to temporarily reduce air pollution.
[01:42.000 --> 01:51.000]  This comes days after President Barack Obama and Xi Jinping announced the ratification of the Paris Climate Change Agreement of the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference.
[01:51.000 --> 02:04.000]  The main themes of the summit include fighting tax evasion through the formulation of a tax haven blacklist, fiscal stimulus and innovation to boost economic growth in the G20 countries, combating populist attacks against globalization and strengthening support for refugees.
[02:09.000 --> 02:14.000]  The United Nations Security Council will meet tomorrow to discuss the latest missile tests launched by North Korea.
[02:14.000 --> 02:19.000]  They apparently fired three ballistic missiles into the Sea of Japan today from a site on their eastern coast.
[02:19.000 --> 02:27.000]  South Korea's joint chiefs of staff are saying that they identified the type of projectile as being the Rodong missile, which has a range of up to 1,000 kilometers.
[02:27.000 --> 02:34.000]  North Korea has continued its series of missile tests this year in opposition to the UN sanctions imposed after its fourth nuclear test in January.
[02:34.000 --> 02:42.000]  Today's missile firings are concerning since world leaders are currently meeting in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou for the two-day G20 Summit.
[02:42.000 --> 02:51.000]  The Japanese cabinet secretary Yoshihide Suga did state that, quote, this launches a clear attack of provocation not only to our own country, but to the international community.
[02:51.000 --> 03:17.000]  This was Rick Brody with the Lowdown for September 5th, 2016.
[03:17.000 --> 03:24.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin. This is an interesting issue.
[03:24.000 --> 03:33.000]  You mentioned you were trying to get the court to recognize that you have standing.
[03:33.000 --> 03:44.000]  So that brings an issue. Who had standing to bring this issue to the court in the first place?
[03:44.000 --> 03:52.000]  Well, how they're trying to do this is a, and I don't understand how this is possible.
[03:52.000 --> 04:01.000]  They're filing a stipulation to stipulate the closing of a criminal case.
[04:01.000 --> 04:19.000]  And I'm not sure how even that's possible where the defendant's attorney can file a stipulation and stipulate two terms to get the state's prosecutor to go, yeah, I guess we're done.
[04:19.000 --> 04:25.000]  I would think the person's dead. The state loses its standing.
[04:25.000 --> 04:31.000]  Everybody loses their standing because the dead are beyond the power of the court.
[04:31.000 --> 04:35.000]  And it would be just like everybody gets bored and walks away.
[04:35.000 --> 04:39.000]  The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
[04:39.000 --> 04:41.000]  Right.
[04:41.000 --> 04:49.000]  Because they don't have jurisdiction over wherever this place the dead guy is.
[04:49.000 --> 05:02.000]  I'm not going to venture a speculation as to where that might be. But wherever it is, it's not in the venue of the court.
[05:02.000 --> 05:24.000]  And I haven't seen what this magical hidden stipulation is because the email that got this whole thing started, I'll go ahead and find it here for the benefit of the listeners.
[05:24.000 --> 05:28.000]  All right, because there are a lot of emails.
[05:28.000 --> 05:31.000]  Why are you digging through it?
[05:31.000 --> 05:34.000]  Yeah, the lawyer's dead.
[05:34.000 --> 05:36.000]  He doesn't have any interest.
[05:36.000 --> 05:42.000]  The attorney was the attorney for the lawyer in a criminal prosecution.
[05:42.000 --> 05:53.000]  Well, on his death, the criminal prosecution becomes no or becomes moot.
[05:53.000 --> 05:59.000]  So he's no longer this person's attorney because he's a dead guy.
[05:59.000 --> 06:02.000]  And this is not a probate hearing.
[06:02.000 --> 06:09.000]  So is there anything left of a dead guy other than a probate hearing?
[06:09.000 --> 06:12.000]  But he's been saying all this.
[06:12.000 --> 06:15.000]  Let's say Billy Graham.
[06:15.000 --> 06:18.000]  He was pretty well known, pretty well respected.
[06:18.000 --> 06:26.000]  Somebody come along after he's dead, disparaging his good name.
[06:26.000 --> 06:40.000]  Could his heirs or children have standing to defend his good name?
[06:40.000 --> 06:53.000]  Under the publicity rights that have been set up to help protect the money flows of what the entertainment industry has put together,
[06:53.000 --> 06:56.000]  apparently there is value there.
[06:56.000 --> 07:07.000]  But you have to be someone of notoriety to have a publicity that there are rights.
[07:07.000 --> 07:11.000]  And I mean, I don't see them selling t-shirts with this guy's face and saying,
[07:11.000 --> 07:17.000]  hey, we're the group of lawyers that can get you declared innocent.
[07:17.000 --> 07:21.000]  I don't see where there's any publicity to be had here.
[07:21.000 --> 07:23.000]  No, I'm not talking about publicity.
[07:23.000 --> 07:29.000]  I just happen to use Billy Graham because he's well known and well respected.
[07:29.000 --> 07:34.000]  He has a good name, unlike Bill Cosby had a good name.
[07:34.000 --> 07:38.000]  But nobody ever disparaged Billy Graham.
[07:38.000 --> 07:39.000]  He always had a good name.
[07:39.000 --> 07:48.000]  So if somebody come along and started making defamatory and defaming statements about his character,
[07:48.000 --> 08:01.000]  would his heirs have standing to defend his character even after he's dead?
[08:01.000 --> 08:08.000]  The only way that I see that I've been able to find is this idea of publicity rights.
[08:08.000 --> 08:11.000]  And so, yes, there would be a basis.
[08:11.000 --> 08:14.000]  And California seems to be the charge on that.
[08:14.000 --> 08:24.000]  Although I don't know what the federal basis or state-by-state basis would be.
[08:24.000 --> 08:32.000]  So what I'm trying to find is how the other side is going to bring an argument.
[08:32.000 --> 08:35.000]  So if they bring one, you can be ready for it.
[08:35.000 --> 08:36.000]  Right.
[08:36.000 --> 08:47.000]  It's easy to see how someone Billy Graham's children would have an interest in protecting his good name.
[08:47.000 --> 09:00.000]  So if there is a law that would allow that, could it apply to a lawyer in a criminal prosecution?
[09:00.000 --> 09:08.000]  And one who had no notoriety to speak of before them?
[09:08.000 --> 09:12.000]  They're trying to find a way they could get there.
[09:12.000 --> 09:14.000]  I see this as a dead guy.
[09:14.000 --> 09:23.000]  If the lawyer doesn't have a contract authorizing him to represent the person's estate,
[09:23.000 --> 09:26.000]  because on death that's all he's got,
[09:26.000 --> 09:33.000]  I don't see how this lawyer has standing to do anything to criminal cases moot.
[09:33.000 --> 09:39.000]  Then how are they even allowing the stipulation?
[09:39.000 --> 09:45.000]  Because I've never heard of a stipulation for ending a criminal case.
[09:45.000 --> 09:56.000]  Do they have statutory or stare decisis support for what they're asking the court to do?
[09:56.000 --> 10:01.000]  As I understand, they're asking the court to seal records.
[10:01.000 --> 10:06.000]  Everybody has an interest in the public record.
[10:06.000 --> 10:09.000]  They do not have statutory support.
[10:09.000 --> 10:16.000]  And the actual text of the email that I received was,
[10:16.000 --> 10:20.000]  I was able to speak with the assistant DA yesterday
[10:20.000 --> 10:25.000]  and informed her of your wishes in regards to sealing the case and not deleting it.
[10:25.000 --> 10:30.000]  At this point, the assistant DA isn't going to specifically disagree with the defense attorney
[10:30.000 --> 10:36.000]  and intends to sign the defense attorney's stipulation to seal the case and have it deleted.
[10:36.000 --> 10:41.000]  After that, I'll go to the judge who will make a determination on whether or not he agrees with the stipulation.
[10:41.000 --> 10:47.000]  If the judge agrees that it should be sealed and deleted, there will not be a hearing coming,
[10:47.000 --> 10:49.000]  which is coming up next week.
[10:49.000 --> 10:50.000]  The case will be closed.
[10:50.000 --> 10:52.000]  There will be no more court dates.
[10:52.000 --> 10:59.000]  And the way in which this is worded, it sounds like the original plan was,
[10:59.000 --> 11:03.000]  here's the stipulation, the two of us are agreeing on it.
[11:03.000 --> 11:07.000]  Let's say if you judge and if the judge agreed with the stipulation,
[11:07.000 --> 11:12.000]  the stipulation and everything would be beyond the public's reach,
[11:12.000 --> 11:21.000]  which got me filing the paperwork and now they're going to continue with the hearing.
[11:21.000 --> 11:26.000]  It also has resulted in one of the state reps being contacted
[11:26.000 --> 11:32.000]  and the state rep has been weighing in with the victim's mother.
[11:32.000 --> 11:41.000]  And these state reps are saying, yeah, the judge can't seal the case.
[11:41.000 --> 11:49.000]  So this is all going to be real interesting to see what they do and whatever this stipulated.
[11:49.000 --> 11:58.000]  If the judge seals the case, would not any member of the public have standing to,
[11:58.000 --> 12:04.000]  as an intervener, to appeal the judge's rule?
[12:04.000 --> 12:06.000]  I would think so.
[12:06.000 --> 12:14.000]  However, in talking with a group of people that are explicitly, as they say,
[12:14.000 --> 12:21.000]  safeguarding access to state and local government and defending freedom of the press since 1978,
[12:21.000 --> 12:30.000]  they have stated that yes, someone can approach the court to reopen or to open up the record,
[12:30.000 --> 12:34.000]  but that's a little harder than nipping it in the bud.
[12:34.000 --> 12:38.000]  And so we're in the attempt to nip it in the bud stage.
[12:38.000 --> 12:46.000]  And of course, I as a person, the only thing I can think of doing and what I've done is said,
[12:46.000 --> 12:52.000]  I wish to have my voice heard as an amicus curi brief.
[12:52.000 --> 12:55.000]  And so that's the paperwork that I filed,
[12:55.000 --> 13:07.000]  unless there would have been better attempt than that to get my voice heard by the judge.
[13:07.000 --> 13:14.000]  That would be interesting to see how they make these determinations.
[13:14.000 --> 13:19.000]  If they seal, what are you prepared to do?
[13:19.000 --> 13:24.000]  If they seal, I'm prepared to file paperwork to reopen.
[13:24.000 --> 13:35.000]  Also, one of the latest emails says that, let's see, all right,
[13:35.000 --> 13:45.000]  the latest email says that if they, and I've got to find it again, it's paraphrasing,
[13:45.000 --> 13:50.000]  if they seal the case, they can't really delete it.
[13:50.000 --> 14:00.000]  And so what would end up happening, okay, here I found it.
[14:00.000 --> 14:01.000]  I'll paraphrase it.
[14:01.000 --> 14:04.000]  Oh, here it is, here it is.
[14:04.000 --> 14:09.000]  The record will still be available through a request of the district attorney
[14:09.000 --> 14:12.000]  and maybe through special request with the clerk.
[14:12.000 --> 14:21.000]  So it will cease to be on the computer and cease to be available at the clerk's office normally.
[14:21.000 --> 14:24.000]  A special request would have to be made.
[14:24.000 --> 14:30.000]  To me, that also says that if the record is still available through a request,
[14:30.000 --> 14:34.000]  I can also still get a copy and once I have a copy,
[14:34.000 --> 14:43.000]  I can post whatever I wish on the Internet if I so desire.
[14:43.000 --> 14:47.000]  So they're saying a request must be made.
[14:47.000 --> 14:59.000]  Are there any stipulations as to the requirements for one to be able to make the request?
[14:59.000 --> 15:06.000]  At this point, no clue because you are as knowledgeable on this as I am given,
[15:06.000 --> 15:17.000]  I've just read you the sentence or two sentences discussing it in this additional email.
[15:17.000 --> 15:20.000]  Now, there's nothing stopping me from approaching the court to say,
[15:20.000 --> 15:26.000]  no, pry this thing back open and we go through the hassle.
[15:26.000 --> 15:31.000]  I don't know who my counterparty is going to be on prying the case back open.
[15:31.000 --> 15:35.000]  Wait a minute, can you look at this case right now?
[15:35.000 --> 15:39.000]  I can go down and look at the case right now.
[15:39.000 --> 15:43.000]  Can you photograph the documents?
[15:43.000 --> 15:49.000]  I can certainly pay for the $1.25 and have each document photocopied, yes.
[15:49.000 --> 15:57.000]  If you get those documents and post them on a website, all this becomes mooch.
[15:57.000 --> 16:04.000]  Yes, and in fact that's part of my argument and inspired by a conversation last week
[16:04.000 --> 16:11.000]  with your hosts who pinched it for you on Thursday,
[16:11.000 --> 16:17.000]  I went with let's have a solution that everything gets published.
[16:17.000 --> 16:23.000]  I mean everything, transcripts, the whole enchilada.
[16:23.000 --> 16:32.000]  There's a case in California where a lawyer cited unpublished cases
[16:32.000 --> 16:38.000]  and when the court challenged him, he told them that he found these on the internet,
[16:38.000 --> 16:46.000]  therefore they're published and the Supreme ruled in his favor and said yes, they were.
[16:46.000 --> 16:48.000]  Hang on, about to give it a break.
[16:48.000 --> 16:54.000]  Randy Kelton, Radio, call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:54.000 --> 16:57.000]  Renee, Neil, Oliver, I see you there.
[16:57.000 --> 17:23.000]  We'll get to everybody.
[17:27.000 --> 17:50.000]  We'll get to everybody.
[17:50.000 --> 18:01.000]  We'll get to everybody.
[18:01.000 --> 18:05.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[18:05.000 --> 18:07.000]  except in the area of nutrition.
[18:07.000 --> 18:10.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves
[18:10.000 --> 18:12.000]  and it's time we changed all that.
[18:12.000 --> 18:18.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[18:18.000 --> 18:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[18:22.000 --> 18:26.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[18:26.000 --> 18:32.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[18:32.000 --> 18:35.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much,
[18:35.000 --> 18:40.000]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[18:40.000 --> 18:43.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[18:43.000 --> 18:48.000]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[18:48.000 --> 18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[18:52.000 --> 18:55.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[18:55.000 --> 18:59.000]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[18:59.000 --> 19:02.000]  Order now.
[19:02.000 --> 19:13.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, www.logosradionetwork.com.
[19:13.000 --> 19:15.000]  Well, don't let nothing get to you.
[19:15.000 --> 19:18.000]  Only the father can deliver you.
[19:18.000 --> 19:21.000]  And don't let bad-minded people hurt you.
[19:21.000 --> 19:24.000]  Until Satan gets behind you.
[19:24.000 --> 19:29.000]  Norman, my friend, and all of your children.
[19:29.000 --> 19:33.000]  Those things are hardly pretty.
[19:33.000 --> 19:35.000]  Okay, we are back.
[19:35.000 --> 19:37.000]  Randy Kelton, the root of our radio.
[19:37.000 --> 19:39.000]  And we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin.
[19:39.000 --> 19:41.000]  Okay, Mark.
[19:41.000 --> 19:42.000]  All right.
[19:42.000 --> 19:49.000]  Another little tidbit is they've been trying to work out rules or a law
[19:49.000 --> 19:56.000]  to be able to delete things from the computerized record.
[19:56.000 --> 20:02.000]  And it turns out that they had a meeting in May of this year
[20:02.000 --> 20:06.000]  with the Wisconsin Supreme Court justices.
[20:06.000 --> 20:09.000]  And there's a wonderful poll quote.
[20:09.000 --> 20:14.000]  One of the justices, Justice Ann Walsh Brady, said she opposed the motion
[20:14.000 --> 20:17.000]  to dismiss because, and I quote,
[20:17.000 --> 20:23.000]  it is our responsibility to solve this problem, unquote.
[20:23.000 --> 20:30.000]  So in my amicus curi attempt, I invoke that and call on the judge.
[20:30.000 --> 20:35.000]  You're being asked to solve this problem by your bosses.
[20:35.000 --> 20:37.000]  Oh, what is the case?
[20:37.000 --> 20:48.000]  There's a case from 1814 or just right around the turn of the 17th to 18th century
[20:48.000 --> 20:53.000]  where the Supreme said that unlike the legislature,
[20:53.000 --> 20:58.000]  we may not avoid an issue because it is onerous.
[20:58.000 --> 21:02.000]  We must take jurisdiction where jurisdiction is had
[21:02.000 --> 21:07.000]  and we may not take jurisdiction where jurisdiction is not had.
[21:07.000 --> 21:10.000]  Somebody probably knows which one that is.
[21:10.000 --> 21:15.000]  I haven't quoted it in a long time, so I lost the citation.
[21:15.000 --> 21:20.000]  But it goes to that, they can't avoid it because it's onerous.
[21:20.000 --> 21:28.000]  Oh, and this is onerous all over because one of the other justices,
[21:28.000 --> 21:30.000]  we've got two justices named Bradley,
[21:30.000 --> 21:38.000]  the other Justice Bradley said that the petition seemed quite legislative in nature, unquote,
[21:38.000 --> 21:41.000]  which would be a big no-no for the court dominated by people
[21:41.000 --> 21:44.000]  who vowed to never legislate from the bench.
[21:44.000 --> 21:48.000]  Oh, this has got furry hair.
[21:48.000 --> 21:54.000]  So is this what he was saying, is there's no law in support of this?
[21:54.000 --> 22:00.000]  Right, there is, and that's why the legislature is attempting to pass a law.
[22:00.000 --> 22:11.000]  The open records group, their characterization of this issue is if this law was in a,
[22:11.000 --> 22:16.000]  if this law comes into effect as written,
[22:16.000 --> 22:22.000]  O.J. Simpson would be able to have his case purged,
[22:22.000 --> 22:33.000]  meaning the O.J. Simpson trial with the ex-wife and boyfriend murder case.
[22:33.000 --> 22:42.000]  So anyone who has a case that would look bad for them, they need a purge.
[22:42.000 --> 22:52.000]  Any case where you were found at some, for whatever reason, not, you were not found guilty.
[22:52.000 --> 22:59.000]  Because if we remember the Nicole Simpson issue, Mr. Simpson was found not guilty.
[22:59.000 --> 23:03.000]  That is a good point.
[23:03.000 --> 23:04.000]  It is.
[23:04.000 --> 23:08.000]  That is a really good point.
[23:08.000 --> 23:11.000]  Okay, you don't like this lawyer, and he was scoundrel,
[23:11.000 --> 23:17.000]  but he was never convicted of whatever it is he was charged with.
[23:17.000 --> 23:23.000]  So should this accusation follow him in the grave?
[23:23.000 --> 23:31.000]  Yeah, and that's what they are saying it shouldn't.
[23:31.000 --> 23:37.000]  And Wisconsin law up to this point that I can find supports the idea
[23:37.000 --> 23:40.000]  that no, the record should stay the record.
[23:40.000 --> 23:47.000]  Okay, in that regard, anyone who is charged with the crime
[23:47.000 --> 23:55.000]  and the case is ultimately dismissed, the record should all be expunged.
[23:55.000 --> 24:01.000]  That's what the legislature has tried to pass.
[24:01.000 --> 24:08.000]  That's what the one Justice Bradley says it is our responsibility to solve this problem.
[24:08.000 --> 24:12.000]  The other Justice Bradley says it's quite legislative in nature,
[24:12.000 --> 24:17.000]  and therefore that's why she voted against.
[24:17.000 --> 24:20.000]  It would wreak havoc on the public courts.
[24:20.000 --> 24:27.000]  We would only have access to cases where a person was convicted.
[24:27.000 --> 24:37.000]  We couldn't find a pattern of conduct where police arrest, harass, and then dismiss.
[24:37.000 --> 24:42.000]  Right, but that's why my solution was all right,
[24:42.000 --> 24:53.000]  you've got case law from at least 1917 that I could find through 1970, which I cite.
[24:53.000 --> 24:56.000]  I suggested that we go with radical openness,
[24:56.000 --> 25:02.000]  that the entire case including everything be made available,
[25:02.000 --> 25:08.000]  and that the person who is ultimately exonerated by whatever reason they were exonerated
[25:08.000 --> 25:15.000]  would have the ability to place statements into the record that this point, this point,
[25:15.000 --> 25:21.000]  this point shows my innocence, or they figure out something.
[25:21.000 --> 25:29.000]  Because the closed nature hasn't been approved by the justices at this point.
[25:29.000 --> 25:36.000]  Let's try a different idea, why not total openness?
[25:36.000 --> 25:40.000]  Because I have no good solution, and the legislature,
[25:40.000 --> 25:46.000]  the reason they're citing bury this stuff is so people can get jobs.
[25:46.000 --> 25:50.000]  Well, the problem is while they can remove the court records,
[25:50.000 --> 25:56.000]  they can't remove all of the other data records that are out there that are derived
[25:56.000 --> 26:00.000]  from those court records as the case progressed.
[26:00.000 --> 26:05.000]  So if you pay $1.99, you can buy this person I'm looking at dating
[26:05.000 --> 26:10.000]  what things they've been charged with.
[26:10.000 --> 26:15.000]  So deleting the public record doesn't get rid of the bad information,
[26:15.000 --> 26:18.000]  so how do you deal with bad information?
[26:18.000 --> 26:24.000]  And after talking with and getting a tongue-lashing from Eddie last Thursday,
[26:24.000 --> 26:27.000]  they said, you know what, why don't we think about radical openness,
[26:27.000 --> 26:31.000]  that everything's there?
[26:31.000 --> 26:34.000]  Because we tried burying it, burying it isn't going to work.
[26:34.000 --> 26:37.000]  What's our other alternatives?
[26:37.000 --> 26:43.000]  I thought we pretty well had radical openness for the most part.
[26:43.000 --> 26:48.000]  Well, we don't have the transcript of exactly what happened.
[26:48.000 --> 26:55.000]  You know, that was usually never, and certainly human beings are lazy,
[26:55.000 --> 26:59.000]  as Larry Wall would say, and that's why he created Pearl.
[26:59.000 --> 27:05.000]  If it's available, the full transcript is available online and more details,
[27:05.000 --> 27:12.000]  at least then somebody, if they were, got over the laziness of at least
[27:12.000 --> 27:15.000]  looking at the record and decided to invest the time in reading,
[27:15.000 --> 27:22.000]  they'd learn stuff and have a side benefit of those cases in which someone
[27:22.000 --> 27:28.000]  was found not to be guilty of the offense by whatever means,
[27:28.000 --> 27:33.000]  patterns may be able to be extracted.
[27:33.000 --> 27:39.000]  But again, I have no real good solution, but as you're citing this early 1800s
[27:39.000 --> 27:47.000]  case, we can't avoid an issue just because it's...
[27:47.000 --> 27:51.000]  Man, this thing is covered in hair.
[27:51.000 --> 27:57.000]  There's many yaks to be shaved in this one.
[27:57.000 --> 28:01.000]  I don't know where to go from that one.
[28:01.000 --> 28:03.000]  Oh, yak shaving is a...
[28:03.000 --> 28:06.000]  That's a metaphor that's beyond me at the moment.
[28:06.000 --> 28:10.000]  Okay, we really need to move on.
[28:10.000 --> 28:13.000]  I like these technical legal discussions.
[28:13.000 --> 28:23.000]  It helps you to get your way you think about law sorted out a lot better.
[28:23.000 --> 28:26.000]  It'd be interesting to see how this works out.
[28:26.000 --> 28:32.000]  In the end, the lawyer, however scandalous he seems, was not convicted.
[28:32.000 --> 28:34.000]  Correct.
[28:34.000 --> 28:38.000]  So, Diffie.
[28:38.000 --> 28:40.000]  Yeah, well...
[28:40.000 --> 28:43.000]  Do you have anything else for us?
[28:43.000 --> 28:47.000]  No, no, that was pretty much...
[28:47.000 --> 28:53.000]  I wanted an idea on whether or not a stipulation made sense in a criminal case,
[28:53.000 --> 28:55.000]  because to me it doesn't.
[28:55.000 --> 29:03.000]  And the standing of the dead, because I can picture where the judge can easily say,
[29:03.000 --> 29:09.000]  eh, nobody's got standing here, so I'm just closing the case. Bye.
[29:09.000 --> 29:13.000]  That's probably the best thing you could do.
[29:13.000 --> 29:19.000]  And in my thing, that's what I told him. I said that's the best he could do.
[29:19.000 --> 29:21.000]  Okay, thank you, Mark.
[29:21.000 --> 29:23.000]  Yep, bye-bye.
[29:23.000 --> 29:28.000]  Okay, now we're going to go to Renee in Texas. Hello, Renee.
[29:28.000 --> 29:30.000]  Hey, Randy, how are you?
[29:30.000 --> 29:37.000]  I am good. I don't care what everybody says.
[29:37.000 --> 29:42.000]  Well, now that you are in good standing with having an attorney...
[29:42.000 --> 29:47.000]  Okay, hang on, we're about to go to break.
[29:47.000 --> 29:52.000]  We'll pick this up on the other side. This is Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[29:52.000 --> 30:01.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[30:01.000 --> 30:03.000]  Could a virus make you fat?
[30:03.000 --> 30:07.000]  A new study suggests that being overweight might not be all your fault after all.
[30:07.000 --> 30:11.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you more in just a moment.
[30:11.000 --> 30:15.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches
[30:15.000 --> 30:19.000]  and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[30:19.000 --> 30:22.000]  That's creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:22.000 --> 30:25.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:25.000 --> 30:29.000]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches,
[30:29.000 --> 30:32.000]  or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[30:32.000 --> 30:36.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:36.000 --> 30:39.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:39.000 --> 30:42.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Think twice before blaming yourself or someone else for being overweight.
[30:46.000 --> 30:50.000]  A new study suggests a common childhood virus could be the culprit.
[30:50.000 --> 30:53.000]  Researchers found that children exposed to adenovirus 36,
[30:53.000 --> 30:58.000]  an infection that causes short-term gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms,
[30:58.000 --> 31:02.000]  weighed an average of 52 pounds more than children who were never infected.
[31:02.000 --> 31:06.000]  Researchers believe this fat virus increases the body's fat cells
[31:06.000 --> 31:09.000]  and makes it harder for the body to break down mature fat cells later.
[31:09.000 --> 31:13.000]  The result is that people affected by the virus store more fat overall.
[31:13.000 --> 31:16.000]  So go easy on the next overweight person you see.
[31:16.000 --> 31:20.000]  Diet and exercise may not work as well for them as they do for you.
[31:20.000 --> 31:25.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:31.000 --> 31:34.000]  Did you know there are 3 million edible food plants on Earth
[31:34.000 --> 31:37.000]  and none have the nutritional value of the hemp plant?
[31:37.000 --> 31:40.000]  HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:40.000 --> 31:46.000]  It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten-free.
[31:46.000 --> 31:50.000]  Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein,
[31:50.000 --> 31:52.000]  and feeds the body the nutrients it needs.
[31:52.000 --> 31:58.000]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[31:58.000 --> 32:01.000]  Only at HempUSA.org.
[32:03.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:18.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:23.000 --> 32:26.000]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:12.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:12.000 --> 33:26.000]  Music
[33:26.000 --> 33:28.000]  Okay, we are back.
[33:28.000 --> 33:32.000]  Randy Chalkin, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Renee in Texas.
[33:32.000 --> 33:34.000]  Hello, Renee.
[33:34.000 --> 33:36.000]  Hi, Randy. Can you hear me okay?
[33:36.000 --> 33:40.000]  I can hear you okay. We've got more time now.
[33:40.000 --> 33:44.000]  All right. I'm going to try to sum it up.
[33:44.000 --> 33:48.000]  Did you happen to get the email I sent?
[33:48.000 --> 33:54.000]  Don't recognize an email from Renee.
[33:54.000 --> 33:58.000]  When was it sent? I get about 100 a day, so they can...
[33:58.000 --> 34:00.000]  I know you do. Yesterday...
[34:00.000 --> 34:06.000]  And if I get emails that don't have something I can recognize...
[34:06.000 --> 34:12.000]  Oh, there it is. Renee Powers. Okay, got it.
[34:12.000 --> 34:14.000]  Just got it.
[34:14.000 --> 34:25.000]  Well, that's okay. Let me summarize it because I attached my four county records to you that I pulled.
[34:25.000 --> 34:38.000]  It's a foreclosure, pre-foreclosure, just two and a half months, no pay on my mortgage.
[34:38.000 --> 34:51.000]  Basically, I'm dealing with AQUIN and they're being the servicer, also teetering on and being imploded.
[34:51.000 --> 34:57.000]  My question is, I'm at a quandary. I probably know too much.
[34:57.000 --> 35:02.000]  I've been awake for about a decade or two.
[35:02.000 --> 35:15.000]  So, I have looked through all of those court records and we've got Adida Trust, we've got...
[35:15.000 --> 35:19.000]  Okay, who was the original lender?
[35:19.000 --> 35:28.000]  They are dead. They ran out of business in 2009, SMI Mortgage Broker.
[35:28.000 --> 35:40.000]  They threw that to option one and that's filed a year later.
[35:40.000 --> 35:50.000]  Then option one dies in 2008. I think they went out of business.
[35:50.000 --> 36:05.000]  Lo and behold, in 2010, they reawake from the grave vampire and assign it to Deutsche Bank National Trust.
[36:05.000 --> 36:08.000]  Okay, in 2010.
[36:08.000 --> 36:12.000]  You have a real good claim there.
[36:12.000 --> 36:17.000]  You're in Texas. Okay, you've got a good claim.
[36:17.000 --> 36:26.000]  Okay, you're two or three months in arrears. Have they sent you a notice of acceleration?
[36:26.000 --> 36:29.000]  They sent me a notice of default.
[36:29.000 --> 36:31.000]  That'll work.
[36:31.000 --> 36:32.000]  Okay.
[36:32.000 --> 36:43.000]  Now you need to send a qualified written request with the notice of rescission snuck in at the bottom.
[36:43.000 --> 36:51.000]  Yes, I've heard about that and I sent a weak QWR two, three days ago.
[36:51.000 --> 36:54.000]  A weak one meaning nothing.
[36:54.000 --> 37:01.000]  What was the nature of the accounting error you claimed?
[37:01.000 --> 37:14.000]  So I hear it actually says complete payment history that can be easily read and understood.
[37:14.000 --> 37:18.000]  Breakdown of the amount claimed in the arrears of delinquency.
[37:18.000 --> 37:23.000]  Explanation of what you mean by the assignment sale or transfer.
[37:23.000 --> 37:31.000]  Okay, okay, good, good. That's not a qualified written request.
[37:31.000 --> 37:40.000]  A qualified written request is a document claiming an accounting error and a requirement that the service correct the error.
[37:40.000 --> 37:48.000]  So that's good. They don't have a QWR. It doesn't matter what it's called. It is what it is.
[37:48.000 --> 37:52.000]  And yours is a request for production of documents.
[37:52.000 --> 37:55.000]  I have one.
[37:55.000 --> 38:01.000]  It takes a little work to get it put together in order to produce it.
[38:01.000 --> 38:16.000]  I need a note, truth in lending statement, HUD 1 settlement statement, and a good faith estimate if you got one.
[38:16.000 --> 38:19.000]  I do not. Well, I can't find it.
[38:19.000 --> 38:23.000]  It's not important. I can do it without a good faith estimate.
[38:23.000 --> 38:35.000]  But from that I can produce you a really good qualified written request with debt validation demand at the front and rescission at the back.
[38:35.000 --> 38:41.000]  You see all that stuff you asked for? Mine asked for all that stuff too.
[38:41.000 --> 38:49.000]  And what's going to happen is they read the first part where I do the demand for validation of the debt.
[38:49.000 --> 38:59.000]  And then I stipulate the accounting error by claiming that all of the fees charged on the HUD 1 settlement statement are fraudulent.
[38:59.000 --> 39:10.000]  And deduct those from the principal and demand that they recalculate your payment amount without those fees included.
[39:10.000 --> 39:14.000]  And then I do 15 pages of trash.
[39:14.000 --> 39:19.000]  Show me this, show me that, show me everything but your mother's laws underwear.
[39:19.000 --> 39:27.000]  And the lawyer is going to get to that part and he's going to say this is garbage, this is garbage, this is garbage, and they never read the last paragraph.
[39:27.000 --> 39:41.000]  It says if you fail to adequately respond to this request within the statutory time limit you shall construe this document as a notice of rescission.
[39:41.000 --> 39:45.000]  They never read that one.
[39:45.000 --> 40:07.000]  I know, I love that part. I moved and I don't have my paperwork on the original and I have hunted down Hexter Fair who is out of business and has informed me they destroy everything beyond seven years.
[40:07.000 --> 40:14.000]  That is horse manure, they don't destroy anything.
[40:14.000 --> 40:17.000]  That's what I thought. It's too cheap to keep it.
[40:17.000 --> 40:24.000]  I just received in the mail today four flash drives.
[40:24.000 --> 40:29.000]  They're two terabytes each.
[40:29.000 --> 40:34.000]  One of them would hold four times what I've got in my computer.
[40:34.000 --> 40:41.000]  So space has gotten too cheap, they don't destroy anything.
[40:41.000 --> 40:51.000]  They're probably lying like dogs, but you still may not have access to your paperwork.
[40:51.000 --> 40:55.000]  You say the note was originally 2001?
[40:55.000 --> 40:57.000]  2006.
[40:57.000 --> 41:04.000]  2006.
[41:04.000 --> 41:13.000]  Okay.
[41:13.000 --> 41:18.000]  Do you have any of the closing documents at all?
[41:18.000 --> 41:21.000]  Not that I have put my hands on.
[41:21.000 --> 41:28.000]  I've got to go back through several boxes that I can try.
[41:28.000 --> 41:32.000]  See if you can find them, they could be very valuable.
[41:32.000 --> 41:40.000]  If not, you still have a pretty good declaratory judgment claim.
[41:40.000 --> 41:42.000]  Yeah, I heard all of that.
[41:42.000 --> 41:49.000]  And you might just send them a notice of rescission.
[41:49.000 --> 41:56.000]  All you have to do is show $35 undisclosed funds.
[41:56.000 --> 42:01.000]  Okay, we can calculate the amount that was on the HUD-1 settlement statement.
[42:01.000 --> 42:04.000]  Remember the original purchase price of the property?
[42:04.000 --> 42:07.000]  Oh yeah, $100,000.
[42:07.000 --> 42:09.000]  $100,000.
[42:09.000 --> 42:14.000]  What was the original principle?
[42:14.000 --> 42:17.000]  That was the original principle.
[42:17.000 --> 42:22.000]  The purchase price was $125.
[42:22.000 --> 42:28.000]  I put $125 cash down.
[42:28.000 --> 42:34.000]  What was the asking price of the seller?
[42:34.000 --> 42:36.000]  $135.
[42:36.000 --> 42:43.000]  I talked him down, so we agreed on $125.
[42:43.000 --> 42:49.000]  So I put $125 down and I financed $100.
[42:49.000 --> 42:57.000]  Okay, if you financed $100, your original principle was more than $100.
[42:57.000 --> 43:03.000]  It was most likely $108 to $112.
[43:03.000 --> 43:05.000]  Oh, for the closing cost.
[43:05.000 --> 43:07.000]  Yes.
[43:07.000 --> 43:08.000]  You know what?
[43:08.000 --> 43:12.000]  That's what I'm looking for, the closing cost.
[43:12.000 --> 43:14.000]  Yeah.
[43:14.000 --> 43:21.000]  Hector Fair, I talked to, the only location left was Fort Worth, your favorite hub.
[43:21.000 --> 43:30.000]  And I talked to someone handling all of that and she was straight up with,
[43:30.000 --> 43:38.000]  oh, we're not responsible to hold all of that after seven years.
[43:38.000 --> 43:40.000]  I'm not sure what you're talking about.
[43:40.000 --> 43:44.000]  You're talking about a title company?
[43:44.000 --> 43:46.000]  Yeah.
[43:46.000 --> 43:51.000]  Ask for the owner of the title company, say, okay, you're not responsible,
[43:51.000 --> 43:54.000]  you're not required to hold it over seven years, but do you hold it?
[43:54.000 --> 43:56.000]  Do you have it in your archives?
[43:56.000 --> 43:58.000]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[43:58.000 --> 44:02.000]  Okay.
[44:02.000 --> 44:06.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com
[44:06.000 --> 44:09.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904
[44:09.000 --> 44:16.000]  Guadalupe Street Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, find Brave New Books and Chase Bank
[44:16.000 --> 44:18.000]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.000 --> 44:26.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil,
[44:26.000 --> 44:30.000]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.000 --> 44:37.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.000 --> 44:43.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.000 --> 44:47.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products,
[44:47.000 --> 45:01.000]  naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.000 --> 45:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[45:56.000 --> 46:01.000]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:01.000 --> 46:29.000]  Okay, we are back with Andy Kelton from Rule of Law Radio
[46:29.000 --> 46:31.000]  and we're talking to Renee in Texas.
[46:31.000 --> 46:38.000]  Okay, you might call back and ask for a supervisor or something
[46:38.000 --> 46:42.000]  and say, you know, I know you're not required to keep these records,
[46:42.000 --> 46:47.000]  but is there any chance you've got these things in your archives somewhere?
[46:47.000 --> 46:52.000]  Because electronic records are so easy to keep.
[46:52.000 --> 47:01.000]  If I was a database manager and I had this database,
[47:01.000 --> 47:07.000]  nobody would be purging anything out of that database.
[47:07.000 --> 47:18.000]  Not going to happen unless there's some really compelling reason.
[47:18.000 --> 47:24.000]  If you're a database manager, you don't want anybody deleting anything from that database.
[47:24.000 --> 47:30.000]  You may set it so that it can't directly be found, but you don't want it deleted.
[47:30.000 --> 47:35.000]  When people start deleting stuff from the database, that can get out of hand.
[47:35.000 --> 47:40.000]  If you just hide it somewhere and it turns out something got took out
[47:40.000 --> 47:43.000]  that wasn't supposed to, you can go get it and put it back.
[47:43.000 --> 47:48.000]  Very unlikely they purge this data.
[47:48.000 --> 47:58.000]  Like I said, I've got a little flash drive that the size of my pinky finger will hold two terabytes.
[47:58.000 --> 48:01.000]  So keeping the data is a minor thing.
[48:01.000 --> 48:02.000]  Good chance they got it.
[48:02.000 --> 48:10.000]  If they don't, we can extrapolate what the original principle was.
[48:10.000 --> 48:18.000]  Actually, if you have a statement, I can reverse engineer it
[48:18.000 --> 48:24.000]  and figure out what the original principle was based on the current principle in interest.
[48:24.000 --> 48:27.000]  That's what I'm thinking too. Go ahead.
[48:27.000 --> 48:31.000]  Okay. It's a little tricky, but I can get that done.
[48:31.000 --> 48:34.000]  So what do you want to do here?
[48:34.000 --> 48:43.000]  Yes. My objective would be keep the house and then nail them to the wall, the servicer, for as much as I can get.
[48:43.000 --> 48:50.000]  Okay. When I ask this, I'm really being specific here.
[48:50.000 --> 48:53.000]  Not just nail them to the wall.
[48:53.000 --> 49:04.000]  What at the end of the day would be an equitable outcome for you?
[49:04.000 --> 49:07.000]  The house and everything I've paid into it.
[49:07.000 --> 49:14.000]  And you said that's times three if we can find some violation.
[49:14.000 --> 49:21.000]  Okay. So you're saying that you're going to have the whole enchilada.
[49:21.000 --> 49:23.000]  Yes.
[49:23.000 --> 49:25.000]  Not going to happen. There's no reason.
[49:25.000 --> 49:28.000]  Okay.
[49:28.000 --> 49:35.000]  What is it that you want to do right now? You're two months into arrears.
[49:35.000 --> 49:38.000]  What do you want to do right now?
[49:38.000 --> 49:51.000]  I guess get the servicer off my tail because I expect the acceleration foreclosure notice to come from Deutsche Bank.
[49:51.000 --> 49:55.000]  And I looked into the pool and service scene.
[49:55.000 --> 49:59.000]  I know that judges just hate the securitization aspect.
[49:59.000 --> 50:13.000]  But I found rather easily in the declaration that states that the cutoff date to put those securitized...
[50:13.000 --> 50:17.000]  Wait, wait, wait. If I were you, I would never go there.
[50:17.000 --> 50:18.000]  Okay.
[50:18.000 --> 50:22.000]  There was one earlier I suggested he'd give a securitization audit.
[50:22.000 --> 50:27.000]  But Chase was the lender. Chase is the servicer. There were no assignments.
[50:27.000 --> 50:34.000]  There's nothing to work with there. So he should get an securitization audit. You don't need it.
[50:34.000 --> 50:35.000]  Okay.
[50:35.000 --> 50:44.000]  You've got claims coming out your ears. And this thing of the original lender, and this sounds... I've never heard of this company before.
[50:44.000 --> 50:45.000]  Aucoin?
[50:45.000 --> 50:53.000]  It sounds like they just sent SMI mortgage brokers.
[50:53.000 --> 50:54.000]  Yeah.
[50:54.000 --> 51:00.000]  So they disappeared. They obviously weren't really a lender.
[51:00.000 --> 51:07.000]  They were probably a representative for a special purpose vehicle.
[51:07.000 --> 51:11.000]  They probably never held a note.
[51:11.000 --> 51:18.000]  They most likely did not put up the money for the note to get it from the special purpose vehicle.
[51:18.000 --> 51:24.000]  And they immediately, when the note came to their hand, it went to the special purpose vehicle.
[51:24.000 --> 51:31.000]  So it was gone immediately. And then this company went out of business.
[51:31.000 --> 51:44.000]  And who did the assignment from SMI to option one?
[51:44.000 --> 51:45.000]  Was that Maris?
[51:45.000 --> 51:47.000]  SMI?
[51:47.000 --> 51:50.000]  Yeah. Hang on a second.
[51:50.000 --> 51:56.000]  Assignment of the deed of trust.
[51:56.000 --> 52:03.000]  SMI goes to option one in 2007. Hang on.
[52:03.000 --> 52:22.000]  Actually, they claim they have, I suspect, forged, but Terry's signature to do that assignment...
[52:22.000 --> 52:28.000]  Here's what was odd.
[52:28.000 --> 52:33.000]  It was the assignment filing a year later.
[52:33.000 --> 52:42.000]  Okay. Who signed the document? And right above where they affirmed it, there should be who they signed for.
[52:42.000 --> 52:47.000]  The principal of SMI.
[52:47.000 --> 52:50.000]  Okay. What year was this?
[52:50.000 --> 52:59.000]  2000. He signed it in 2006. It filed in 2007.
[52:59.000 --> 53:05.000]  Oh, that might work. Who filed it?
[53:05.000 --> 53:11.000]  A notary and we've got...
[53:11.000 --> 53:13.000]  Okay. Okay. There's a lot we can do here.
[53:13.000 --> 53:23.000]  The first thing we need to do is get the... Where was it notarized at?
[53:23.000 --> 53:25.000]  What state?
[53:25.000 --> 53:27.000]  Notary State of Texas.
[53:27.000 --> 53:52.000]  Okay. Send a request to the notary for verification of acknowledgement. Send a request for a copy of her ledger for the date this was supposedly acknowledged.
[53:52.000 --> 53:54.000]  To the secretary of state.
[53:54.000 --> 53:57.000]  No, send it to the notary.
[53:57.000 --> 53:59.000]  Okay.
[53:59.000 --> 54:07.000]  And if the notary is no longer a notary, does it say when the notary's commission expires?
[54:07.000 --> 54:16.000]  I've got her license number here and it says commission expires in 06, a day after she signed it.
[54:16.000 --> 54:26.000]  Wonderful. Okay. Send her a letter and request her ledger. Should be easy because it'd be the last page.
[54:26.000 --> 54:43.000]  Send a letter to... Oh, SMI doesn't exist. But then again, how did this get filed after SMI ceased to exist?
[54:43.000 --> 55:01.000]  Okay. So that actually was in line with SMI being alive, but what I found was here's where MERS and RoboSigning and clearly RoboSigner,
[55:01.000 --> 55:18.000]  because I've looked her up, did the final assignment of the lien in 2010 acting for option one MERS and they eliminated MERS at the top,
[55:18.000 --> 55:25.000]  but you can tell it's MERS Mortgage Corp. It's Kathy Smith, assistant secretary of option one.
[55:25.000 --> 55:30.000]  Okay. When you say someone's a RoboSigner, I'm going to say so what?
[55:30.000 --> 55:35.000]  Okay. So moving on to... No, no, no. Wait, wait, wait. I'm making a legal point.
[55:35.000 --> 55:47.000]  Okay. The fact that this person is a RoboSigner does not mean that this person did not actually sign this document before a notary.
[55:47.000 --> 55:52.000]  We have to develop some other information.
[55:52.000 --> 56:01.000]  Signed it in Florida and notarized it in Florida.
[56:01.000 --> 56:11.000]  Okay. It gets a little more... This is getting more complex. In order to sort this out, I'd have to see the documentation.
[56:11.000 --> 56:16.000]  It's 214. Is it Dallas? Is this a Dallas property?
[56:16.000 --> 56:17.000]  Yes.
[56:17.000 --> 56:31.000]  I hate Dallas County. If you will email me the documents, I will have a look at them.
[56:31.000 --> 56:41.000]  I would prefer that you name them all with a certain naming convention.
[56:41.000 --> 56:59.000]  Name them Renee, space, year of the document, month of the document, dash day of the document, all in numbers, and then the title of the document.
[56:59.000 --> 57:08.000]  When you name them that way and you put them in a folder, they will order themselves in chronological order.
[57:08.000 --> 57:20.000]  That makes my life a whole lot easier. If you start with your name, if I get the document in the wrong place, it's real easy to tell so that way I can keep everything sorted.
[57:20.000 --> 57:26.000]  I will go through it and let you know what I think you've got.
[57:26.000 --> 57:37.000]  Okay. So you would like four emails for each document or in that email you want me to specify each document?
[57:37.000 --> 57:48.000]  Yes, I'd like you to specify each document separate so that I spend half my time sorting out documents when I do one of these evaluations.
[57:48.000 --> 57:59.000]  If you use this naming convention, this is an international date format where you use the year, then the month, then the day.
[57:59.000 --> 58:10.000]  Use that in a name and in the names of the documents and it will cause them to arrange themselves in chronological order.
[58:10.000 --> 58:15.000]  When we're talking about these kind of documents, we need to know exactly when they were filed.
[58:15.000 --> 58:24.000]  I need as much to know what's not there as what is there, and that's why dating is really important.
[58:24.000 --> 58:29.000]  I'll send them to you that way. I'll have a look at them and I'll contact you if you want to file them.
[58:29.000 --> 58:31.000]  Okay.
[58:31.000 --> 58:34.000]  Okay. Then we can maybe talk about it next week.
[58:34.000 --> 58:36.000]  Okay. Thanks, Randy.
[58:36.000 --> 58:42.000]  Okay. Thank you, Renee. This is Randy Kelkin with Rue La Radio.
[58:42.000 --> 58:46.000]  Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[58:46.000 --> 58:50.000]  Neal Olivier, we'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:55.000]  We'll be right back.
[59:20.000 --> 59:28.000]  The basic elements of the Christian life clearly presents God's plan of salvation growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:28.000 --> 59:34.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the Christian life,
[59:34.000 --> 59:41.000]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:41.000 --> 59:51.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:02.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.000 --> 01:00:11.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:23.000]  Today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  The markets for Labor Day, Monday, the 5th of September, 2016, closed with gold at $1,326.90 an ounce, silver, $19.53 an ounce, Texas crude, $44.44 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $606 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  Today in history, the year 1698, in an effort to westernize his nobility, the Tsar of Russia, Peter I, imposes a tax on beards for all men except the clergy and peasantry.
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:09.000]  Though believe it not, it wasn't the first beard tax in history. Those who did resist the tax on beards were forcibly and publicly shaven. The Tsar beard tax. Today in history.
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  In recent news, the 11th meeting of the Group of 20, or G20, is underway with the 2016 G20 Hangzhou Summit. It will be held on the 4th and 5th of September.
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  It is the first G20 Summit to be hosted in China and the second in an Asian country with the 2010 G20 Seoul Summit in South Korea.
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  Apparently only some vehicles have been allowed through the city. Construction sites were stopped. Inhabitants received a week-long holiday being encouraged to leave the city for the week, and hundreds of factories in the region were asked to stop their production.
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  All in a last-minute effort to temporarily reduce air pollution. This comes days after President Barack Obama and Xi Jinping announced the ratification of the Paris Climate Change Agreement of the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  Some of the main themes of the summit include fighting tax evasion through the formulation of a tax haven blacklist, fiscal stimulus, and innovation to boost economic growth in the G20 countries, combating populist attacks against globalization, and strengthening support for refugees.
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  The United Nations Security Council will meet tomorrow to discuss the latest missile tests launched by North Korea. They apparently fired three ballistic missiles into the Sea of Japan today from a site on their eastern coast.
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  South Korea's joint chiefs of staff are saying that they identified the type of projectile as being the Rodong missile, which has a range of up to 1,000 kilometers.
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  North Korea has continued its series of missile tests this year in opposition to the UN sanctions imposed after its fourth nuclear test in January.
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  These missile firings are concerning since world leaders are currently meeting in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou.
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:54.000]  For the two-day G20 summit, the Japanese cabinet secretary Yoshihide Suga did state that, quote, this launches a clear attack of provocation not only to our own country, but to the international community.
[01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  Here's Brooke Brody with her lowdown for September 5th, 2016.
[01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:28.000]  Okay. We are back.
[01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:30.000]  Hi, Mr. Kelton. How are you?
[01:03:30.000 --> 01:03:35.000]  I'm good. What do you have for us today?
[01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  I have two questions. One's medical and one's on the property my family owns. The medical one, I'm getting treated right now for a medical condition. I have partially cut spinal cord.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  And at certain points in time, my medicine can't control it. So I went in, I have to go into the hospital, and my doctor was called the head of the ER and did all this stuff.
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  Well, every once in a while, I had to go back probably about once a month. And they said, eventually they said that they don't care what the doctor said.
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:31.000]  It was a narcotic that was the only thing they could find there that would stop the swelling for that time period.
[01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  And then I would go back and get medical treatment from the doctor that was treating me.
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:43.000]  So he wrote a letter stating that I wouldn't be able to come back to get treated.
[01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  And I said, well, when I have this, I have no control. You know, I get swelling up in through my head.
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  I was like, what are you going to do to stop it? And he said, we can't do anything for you.
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  So I'm like, well, I just won't get treated, you know, because we don't have a way to stop it.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  They can go to the ER. So I was wondering, is there anything I can do in that situation?
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  Yes. But it's not probably not what you were expecting me to say.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  Are you familiar with aloe vera, the plant?
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:27.000]  Aloe vera?
[01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  Yes.
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  Yes.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:33.000]  Do you have an aloe vera plant?
[01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  Yes.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  Take the leaf, cut a section out of the leaf, slice the leaf in half,
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  and slide a section in each sock so it lands on the arch of your foot.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  Aloe vera is like magic when it comes to inflammation. It makes inflammation disappear.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  That's the first thing. You could also put it at the point of the inflammation, but it's not necessary.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:12.000]  If you put it in your sock where it rests against the arch of your foot, you'll draw it right through your skin.
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  It is absolutely magic. I've got a number of magic stories where aloe vera literally saved my hide.
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  Okay. With that said, as to the legal ramifications of lack of treatment, this is an ER.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  Do you have any insurance or Medicare or anything that you're operating under?
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  Yes, I operate under Highmark Insurance.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  Okay. What has the insurance company said about this?
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:09.000]  They're paying the bills. They haven't said anything.
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  The head of the ER said he spoke with a board member himself and I think two other doctors,
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:22.000]  and they said that they don't want to treat me anymore.
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:27.000]  Well, you don't really care. These doctors don't want to treat you,
[01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  so have you talked to the insurance company to get you doctors who will treat you?
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  I'm sorry. I missed that.
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  They said have you talked to the insurance company and have you requested that they find a doctor who will treat you?
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  No, I haven't. I'll try that.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:08:04.000]  You might try that. The doctor himself, he's an ordinary person and he has the right to treat whoever he wants to.
[01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  You can't compel him to treat you because he's a free man like we are.
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:18.000]  But if you have insurance, then if this doctor works under your insurance and he decides not to treat you,
[01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  go back to the insurance company and press them to find a doctor who will treat you.
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:30.000]  Okay. And they do that for emergency rooms?
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  I do not care about emergency rooms. That's a little bit vague.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  It's not clear why only an emergency room can treat you.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:45.000]  Because it's medication.
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:50.000]  The only one that has worked for the past eight years has been Dilaudid,
[01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:53.000]  which is a narcotic only given by emergency rooms.
[01:08:53.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  It's severe. I mean, my whole body shuts down. My limbs shut down. I black out.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  Then you might, the doctor who's refusing to treat you might consider a complaint to the American Medical Association.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  Okay.
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  Because what they're likely to do, they're like the bar associations except they actually do police their doctors.
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  And if you file a complaint with the AMA, they're going to come and step right in the middle of this doctor.
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  And what he's likely to do, if he's going to refuse to treat you, he'll get you someone else who will.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  Okay.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:10:04.000]  That's in his oath. He can't just abandon you to the ravages of a condition if he has the capacity to treat it.
[01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:13.000]  Yeah. I mean, he did. I went in there before he sent out, he sent out I guess an official letter, he called it.
[01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  And I mean, he was like the doctor that was in there said, we're told not to treat you.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:30.000]  So he'll just file an AMA complaint against him and that'll get his attention.
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  Okay.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:36.000]  Big time it'll get his attention.
[01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  All right. I'll make sure I do that. I appreciate that.
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  All right. Anything else? Oh, we got a foreclosure issue.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  Well, it's not a foreclosure. We have in our family, the deed was from, I think we have a copy of the deed.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  The original deed was burned in the courthouse, courthouse burned down.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  The original deed was burnt and we got a deed from the 1920s when it was, I think we bought it.
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  And in 1998, someone put a quick claim on the land.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  And the same story is what you said with the lawyers, they used up thousands of dollars and they didn't even go to court.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:40.000]  Okay. If there was a mortgage against the property?
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:46.000]  No, there was no mortgage, no nothing. Just a neighbor put a quick claim on the land.
[01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  How long ago did he put the claim on the land?
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  In 1998.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  Has he renewed it at all?
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  I'm sorry?
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:04.000]  Okay. What was the nature of the claim?
[01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  The mechanics lien, material machine?
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  I'm not exactly sure to be honest.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:20.000]  So the courthouse in the interim burnt down and they no longer have those records?
[01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:22.000]  Right.
[01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  Okay. So the only way he could express his claim is if he brings a court stamped copy of that lien to the court.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  Okay.
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  And if he has a court stamped copy and you have a challenge, the validity of the document, then he can still enforce it.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:53.000]  Okay. So the quick claim can oversee that original document?
[01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  Wait a minute. Say that again.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  The quick claim in 1998 when he submitted it can oversee the original, not the original, but they made another...
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:18.000]  Wait a minute. He said quick claim. Who filed a quick claim?
[01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  The neighbor did in 1998 saying that...
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  You may be getting your names wrong. A quick claim is not a claim filed against your property.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  A quick claim is where you give up your claim to someone else.
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  What you probably have is a lien against the property of some sort, either a material man's lien, mechanics lien, or some other type of lien.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  Okay.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  So go look in the records. A quick claim is what we would do if he had a claim against the property.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  Say he had a material man's lien against the property. He could file a quick claim into the record and quit claim that lien.
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:25.000]  That's saying, I am abolishing my claim. So then the lien would be void.
[01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  Okay.
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  You might want to pull everything that's been filed into record and then have a look at all the documents.
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  If it is a quick claim, he probably had a prior lien that might have been paid off. So he filed a quick claim to void the prior lien.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:50.000]  Generally, that's done in the form of a release of lien.
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  But it can be done as a quick claim.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  All right.
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:14:57.000]  Okay.
[01:14:57.000 --> 01:14:58.000]  That makes sense.
[01:14:58.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  Is that it?
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  Yep. That's it. Thank you so much, Mr. Kelvin.
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  Okay. Thank you. Now we're going to go to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  All this time I've been calling you Oliver and you never corrected me.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  Why am I missing out on your name here on my screen? So now I know what it is. Okay.
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  Randy, I've been having extremely too much fun. I can't believe it, man.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  Man, they played a devastating move. See, what happened was they fought the president again.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  I was in my suit before I left just to show them that I could write them up, you know what I'm saying, and drop it in the hat.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  The judge had the audacity to try to be dismystigated by Sue Espante.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  He didn't write it in the document of Sue Espante, but, you know, I've been playing beat up with the city attorney and all,
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  and they kind of leaked what was going on because I told them, hey, I'm going to go out to Alex.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  I'm going to whatever city they're in, we understand.
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:27.000]  We understand what you're trying to do because I've been getting them to do a lot of things as far as videos, information and things.
[01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  So now this judge, he's what? I hear music. Hello? Hello?
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  Okay. Hang on. We're about to go to break. There we go.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We're about to go to break. This is Randy Kelton, Wheel of Law Radio, and we'll be right back.
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  We're about to go to break.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Wheel of Law Radio, and we'll be right back.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:14.000]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:18.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polymbers.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:18:54.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoin and bullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:19:24.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  If I can't get everything I want, maybe I'll get a rain chair.
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  If I can't get everything I need, maybe I'll get a rain chair.
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:00.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:02.000]  Randy Kelton, Yule Law Radio.
[01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  We're talking to the radio in Tennessee.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:08.000]  Okay.
[01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:11.000]  The judge is trying to dismiss Responte?
[01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:13.000]  Yeah, you know, he dismissed it.
[01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  He dismissed it already.
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:21.000]  He dismissed it saying that I failed to state a claim of release.
[01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:25.000]  On the complaint, I misplaced one word.
[01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  It said plaintiff alleged that Mr. Olivier was too engaged in the act of transportation.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:36.000]  Did he dismiss with prejudice?
[01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  No, he did not dismiss with prejudice.
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  He dismissed because of all these things that he said I was missing,
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  which is not missing in the complaint.
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  Okay.
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  Did he give you points and authorities?
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:57.000]  Did he explain what was wrong with it and why he dismissed?
[01:20:57.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  Yeah.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  Okay.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  Listen, as Pro says, we're real quick to jump on the judges, and I'm going to suggest that maybe he's not a bad guy at all.
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:24.000]  If he did this to Responte, he looked at your suit and you made a fatal error.
[01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  They could run you through the wringer and then get you up close to the end and then get this thing dismissed because of that error.
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  So the judge didn't try to run you around first.
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  He let you know early on you had a fatal error.
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:54.000]  No, but the thing, it wasn't a fatal error, it was all make-believe. I understand what you're saying, it's a fatal error.
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  It was a word that's missing.
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  Is it not?
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  Everywhere else in the suit, it clearly says not.
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:04.000]  So I mean, you're a judge.
[01:22:04.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  You can't see a typo.
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:07.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  You're saying it's saying not where it should have been no?
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:16.000]  It says, Marsha Olivier was too engaged.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:20.000]  It was supposed to be not, was not engaged in transportation.
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:23.000]  So he made a big fuss on my own.
[01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  That was an inconsistent statement because up here I said that I was engaged.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  If you read the lettering of the law, I'm filing for false imprisonment.
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:35.000]  This is the second time I done did it.
[01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:38.000]  This is the second suit that's in there.
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  What it is, if they were trying to get me out of there, I wasn't tied to that court.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  Okay, wait a minute.
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:47.000]  I'm having a little trouble understanding you.
[01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  I'm not sure why he dismissed.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  Can you explain that a little more clearly?
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:23:02.000]  He dismissed it because he said that I failed to state a claim that can be granted relief.
[01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:05.000]  Okay, failed to state a claim of which recovery can be had.
[01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  Now, what was your claim?
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  How was it stated?
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:13.000]  I had a false imprisonment.
[01:23:13.000 --> 01:23:17.000]  Okay, what are the elements of false imprisonment?
[01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  What's the element of false imprisonment?
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  I don't have it with me, but I think it was you were falsely arrested.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  You got the case dismissed and overturned in your favor.
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  Okay, did you get the case dismissed or overturned in your favor?
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  No, not at the time.
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  I mean, it just happened two weeks ago.
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  It happened two weeks ago, but the same officer already had a false imprisonment suit on him,
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  and the same officer did the same thing again, but I guess he didn't...
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  Okay, hold on.
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  That's not the only way to claim false imprisonment.
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  That's one way.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:16.000]  If he arrested you and failed to take you directly to the nearest magistrate,
[01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  that has nothing to do with the adjudication of the case.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  Anytime they held you secreted from a magistrate, you were falsely imprisoned.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  So how did you state your claim?
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  I stated my claim that I was falsely imprisoned because they stopped me for transportation.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:48.000]  I was engaged in the act of transportation when I was not.
[01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  Clearly, every other sentence, every other paragraph said not, not, not, not, not.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  I missed one not.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:58.000]  The judge is like, well, I'll...
[01:24:58.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  But see, I understand where you...
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  Okay, okay.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  If he didn't dismiss it with prejudice, put that one not back in there,
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  and file it as an amended plea.
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  I did something a little better, I think.
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  I was reading through the code, I mean, through the rules, right?
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  And then I saw that the state...
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  I could authorize the state attorney general's authority
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  if the courts were not following the court procedures.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  On my other case, on my other suit, he failed.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:48.000]  I filed an immediate act for immediate of possession,
[01:25:48.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  which was supposed to be...
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  Wait, wait a minute.
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  Hold on, hold on, hold on.
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  I didn't understand that.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  You filed an immediate what?
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  A writ of personal property.
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  Recipe?
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  It's a writ of possession.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  It's for my inverse condemnation claim.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:09.000]  Right.
[01:26:09.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  So it was supposed to be...
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  They're supposed to give us court dates to come and argue it out.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:19.000]  They were supposed to decide who gets the vehicle.
[01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  If they can't decide who gets the vehicle,
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  then the state has to get the vehicle until the case is all over.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  And then they would have to put a bond on it for the minimum of...
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  For what the cause of work, right?
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:39.000]  So now what he did was he just sent it back to me.
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  He sent it to a clerk, and the clerk told him that,
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  well, they never did this process before.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  It was going on, but I need to pay $250,000 to get my cars
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  to go through this process to file a bond.
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  Like, $250,000?
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  He's like, yeah, the court, I mean,
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  the judge went and assessed all your property,
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  and he assessed it at $250,000.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  He said that the law says that that's the lowest
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:11.000]  that they could put a bond for me to get my stuff.
[01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  I said, okay.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  Since y'all want to do what y'all want to do, I got you.
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  Because now you got me.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:21.000]  You just gave me a document that says my stuff is worth $250,000.
[01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  And then I'm only suing for $75,000 each defendant.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  So thank you.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  Now I got $250,000.
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  So multiply that by three, that's $750,000.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  Oh, you know I slapped that amendment on there.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  Not only did I slap that amendment on there,
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  I went through the rules, the procedure,
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:46.000]  and I wrote every one of them down that they broke,
[01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  and how they broke it.
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  Then I wrote a pro-state paragraph in there stating my position,
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  what's going to happen next,
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  the authority of the state attorney general, how they did it.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:07.000]  Then I wrote another document on the case that he dismissed
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:12.000]  on false imprisonment showing that all the federal rules and laws
[01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  about sui sponte, and it says that you cannot,
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  they are not allowed to sui sponte a pro-state case
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  because of failure to release claim.
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  Everything that he put on that paper says that...
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:38.000]  Wait a minute, you're saying that the judge is specifically forbidden
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:41.000]  by statute to do what he did?
[01:28:41.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  By federal, by statute, and the civil rules.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  I wrote all of it down in there.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  Then as I wrote all that down, I wrote in everything
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  that I can take them for.
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  Did you file criminally against the judge?
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  No, not yet, because here's the thing,
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  I found out that he's going to be presiding judge over all my cases.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  I'm like, wait a minute, I'm not going to do that yet.
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:11.000]  I'm going to file this document.
[01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  Then on top of it, I put, because after I read all the federal stuff,
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:21.000]  on top of it, I put motion, and I said, what's that?
[01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:26.000]  I said...
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  Okay, hang on, we're about to go to break.
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  We've got about 30 seconds.
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  This is Randy Kelton, rule of law radio,
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  our call-in number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  While we're on break, I think it would be a good time
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  to go check out our sponsors and help us support this radio station.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  Frankly, most of the time, we're kind of struggling to keep things going,
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  so we could use all the help we could get.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:04.000]  Pesticides and pathogens on produce? Yuck.
[01:30:04.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  It's a pesky problem, but scientists say there's a simple solution
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:09.000]  to this health hazard right in your own home.
[01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you about a frugal fruit
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:14.000]  and vegetable fix in just a moment.
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:24.000]  That's creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches,
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:38.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:41.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  Pesticides on produce? Yuck.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  Going organic helps, but dirt and pathogens can still be a health hazard.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  Researchers recommend a simple remedy, and you probably already have
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  the ingredients you need right at home.
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  Just fill a spray bottle with one part vinegar to nine parts water.
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  Studies show this simple solution removes over 90 percent of bacteria
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  from items like strawberries and lettuce.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  Follow with a 30-second wash under cold tap water,
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  rubbing or scrubbing firm-skin produce.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  The water removes the vinegar,
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  and the friction will reduce any pesticide residues.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  Amazingly, this inexpensive approach is just as effective
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  as those pricey fruit and vegetable washes, and it costs a whole lot less.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:27.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:03.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:09.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails,
[01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:13.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails,
[01:32:13.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:16.000]  That's why you have insurance,
[01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:18.000]  and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you
[01:32:18.000 --> 01:32:22.000]  with little to no out-of-pocket expense, and we accept Bitcoin.
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  As a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints,
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:30.000]  you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:11.000 --> 01:33:33.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, U of R radio, speaking with Olivier and Tennessee, and all of those who have heard me calling him Oliver for all of this time, my apologies.
[01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  They left an eye out of Olivier, so I got it wrong.
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  Okay, so go ahead, Oliver.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  Okay, so basically everything that he wrote in here saying that is missing in this complaint,
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  I found in the federal description of sua sponte and the orders and how it's supposed to be applied, every one of them was unallowed.
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  They did not allow them to do it.
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  So I wrote all that stuff up. I didn't even write it up in a motion form because once I read their understanding of pro se litigants and what they have to go through, oh man, I went nuts.
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  I said, I'm going to hammer him.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  Man, I slapped that stuff together, put it all in the document, then I turned around and I called the state attorney general's office.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:38.000]  He was like, listen, sir, my name is Marcia Olivier. I got three suits in Montgomery County right now, and I got 10 more coming.
[01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  Now, already, they have procedure violations.
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:51.000]  Now, I'm not trying to invoke your authority right now. I'm not trying to invoke your office authority right now.
[01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  I'm going to go down there and file these documents. I expect these documents to take care of everything.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  If these documents do not take care of everything, I want to let your office know that I will be up there invoking your authority.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  If you do not follow your procedures, I'm going to sue you and the county, I mean, and the city for what's going on.
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  So they're like, oh, okay, we're going to get the message. They're going to call us back and everything.
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  I said, I don't think it should be a problem.
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  So I get in my car. I go down there. I try to file the paperwork, and they're looking at me like, what is this?
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  I want to put this in my documents because the judge did this, and there's a few procedures there.
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  And nobody really knew what was going on. They just don't know.
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:46.000]  So I'm like, well, so they finally took it, and they're trying to figure out, well, what do we do with it?
[01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  So I guess one of the higher-up clerks took it and went in the back and read it.
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  Wait a minute. Slow down a little bit. I'm having a little trouble understanding you.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  Yes.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  You're talking faster than I can listen.
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  It's a lot of stuff. I'm trying to hurry up and get it out. It's piling up on top of each other.
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  They are tripping on top of each other. They are sending me letters with bad case law in it, which I get to sue for.
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  I just got three letters that I get to sue for because they said that this case right here says that we can't give you your public information request
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:34.000]  because you have to do it through your attorney. I read the case. The case was about public agents, public groups.
[01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  They said nothing about defendants. When I went in, they sent me a statute.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  Okay. Hold on. Wait a minute. Who gave you that? Was it an attorney who gave you that?
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  Yes. I called him. I said, I don't think you should send me any other letters like this because did you read this case?
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  I said, did you read it? Because in this case, it conclusively explains that the defendant cannot be denied this.
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  I filed this over 70 days ago. I advise you not to send this information out to anyone else that's a defendant
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  because right now, I got this paperwork in my hand and I have to file against it
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  because I will not allow my citizens to suffer harm when they want to go through a process and they can't get the process done.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  They're like, okay, Mr. Libby, I understand. All right. So please don't send me any more letters.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  Each one of them that I get, I will file against it because you're right here. You put a case law in there.
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  That is totally misleading.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  Okay. One thing to understand about that, if you do that as a pro se, the judge will shake his finger at you.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  But if a lawyer does it, that will get him sanctioned quicker than about anything else.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  So anytime you find a lawyer giving you bad case law, you should petition for sanctions.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  Well, no, but here's the thing. I'm going after the public information request on that aspect
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  because it says that they have seven days to get it to you no matter what.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  And then behind that, they had a statute that says that this is a statute that you sue them under when they don't follow this.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  So I'm saying where you're going at, but I got a lot of cases. I'm not as proficient as you are.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  No, this is just something. I only put that out there so you can kind of keep that in mind.
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  When lawyers start just throwing out trash case law because they expect you not to read it,
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  the one thing that lawyers are most afraid of is bad case law.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:59.000]  That'll get them in bigger trouble than anything else. I'll give you an example of why.
[01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  I was talking to Eddie about this and he said, you always read the cases.
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  And there was a case, Rodriguez v. State, and this has been quoted all over the place.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  I even found the State Supreme Court quoting it. And Eddie dug it out and read it.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:23.000]  And he said, you're not going to believe this, but this case has nothing to do with traffic.
[01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  It was referenced in traffic all the time. Even the State Supreme cited it incorrectly.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  So how the heck does this happen? I thought about it and the only way I can figure it happened
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  is you had some lawyer who's very well known, very well respected.
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  He gives a job to one of his paralegals and his paralegal gets the wrong citation.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  And the lawyer gives the pleading to the judge and the judge looks at it and he trusts the lawyer.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  So he doesn't check the pleading. And then they appeal it and the appeals court gets it
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:09.000]  and they look at it and they trust the lawyer because they know the guy.
[01:40:09.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  So they don't check it. And then it goes to the Supreme.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  Once it got past the Court of Appeals to the Supreme, there's no way the Supreme would check it.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  If it got found out, say the Supreme actually checked it and said, what the heck is this nonsense?
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  The judge, he would be in deep doo-doo. But this will all come back on the trial judge.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  So if you give a trial judge bad case law as a lawyer and the judge trusts your case law
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  and then he gets stung for it, you're in big trouble.
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  So judges are real sensitive to this. They get bad case law from a lawyer.
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:02.000]  You want to sting them good. So anytime you can catch a lawyer giving you bad case law,
[01:41:02.000 --> 01:41:07.000]  you really want to bring that up and ask for sanctions for it.
[01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  See, but during all this legal battle, we're becoming friends.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:22.000]  So he told me to include the DA's office, basically saying that this information did not come from him.
[01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  I said, yes, sir, I will. I know exactly what to do with that. Thank you.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  I've been waiting to get up in there. He threw him underneath the bus.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  But the judge, as far as the judge I was telling you about, I thought that those two paperwork on both,
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:46.000]  one on the case that he dismissed and another on the case of about all the procedures that he failed to do.
[01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  And today was the last day that they had to get us in court to do that transaction.
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:56.000]  So I wrote... Wait a minute. I'm having trouble with your sound.
[01:41:56.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  Can you try to speak a little slower and stay the same distance from the mic? You're fading in and out.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  Okay. I filed the paperwork and I didn't file it in a motion sense on purpose
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:14.000]  because of all the new information that I found out.
[01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  So I filed the paperwork and on top of it, I put opportunity to correct.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:29.000]  And then it's an opportunity to correct and I wrote everything in there.
[01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  So now the ladies, the clerks are trying to figure out what to do with this document because they don't understand.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  One of the higher clerks came over, said, I'll get it, until she grabbed it. She went in the back and she read it.
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  She came back around the corner. She like, he ain't playing.
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  He just wants to submit that he is not playing. He's showing them that he is not playing.
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  She was looking at me like I was a murderer. She was looking at me like I was a murderer
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  because she knew about the suit that I have in and plus about the 10, 11 more that are coming
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:12.000]  because she could look up my file and see all these charges and cases that have been dismissed.
[01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  So she's looking at like, whoa, state attorney general. And I think they might have called their officers.
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  The state attorney officer might have called them before I got there.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  So now she's looking at me like I'm a murderer and like I got the judge stuck.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  Like, yeah, the opportunity is to correct.
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  Even if you correct it, you're still going to get hit because all that time has passed.
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  Okay. Wait, wait, wait. Hold on. We're about to go to break.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Rue de la Radio, and Olivier is having way too much fun.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  I won't give out a call out number. We're going to our last segment.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  Non-GMOsolutions.com is now a proud sponsor of the Logos Radio Network with promo code Logos.
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  We thank you for the opportunity to be your source for new man of foods,
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:15.000]  the leader in high quality food that you will truly enjoy.
[01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:22.000]  You'll find gluten-free options, and all products are free from high fructose corn syrup, aspartame, soy, and MSG.
[01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:27.000]  Whether you're on a tight budget, looking for options to reduce food costs without compromising health
[01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  or securing long-term 25-year storable food for an uncertain future,
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:35.000]  then Non-GMOsolutions.com is your common sense answer.
[01:44:35.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  Take advantage of a 10% discount to promo code Logos.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:45.000]  No longer will you compromise taste and quality for full-term shelf life or eat poor quality food due to cost.
[01:44:45.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  Check out our FlexPay options and design a no-contract plan to satisfy your needs.
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  Go to Non-GMOsolutions.com today and get 10% off with promo code Logos.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  That's Non-GMOsolutions.com with promo code Logos.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  the affordable, easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.000 --> 01:46:21.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:46:21.000 --> 01:46:23.000]  Okay, go ahead, Olivier.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:28.000]  Okay. So I put in, when she reads it, she was like,
[01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  and then she finally understands opportunities to correct.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  She's like, oh my God, like, you know what I'm saying?
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:38.000]  Most people come in, appeal, and go through all that.
[01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:41.000]  I was like, no, nope, nope, nope, nope. I'm going to use you as a slave.
[01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  I'm going to slap you, put all this stuff on you, bam.
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:50.000]  I'm not going to recuse you, because there's only two judges who do the circuit, the civil circuit.
[01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:53.000]  There's only two. Now that I got my foot on your neck,
[01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  you're going to pass on the information to the other one.
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:47:03.000]  So when I filed my other suit, I walked straight through the door with all this money.
[01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:06.000]  Or because I have a year, I have a whole year,
[01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  because it was a constitutional violation, the federal considered it.
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:19.000]  So they put a year limitation on it for me to reopen the case and file on the judge.
[01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:23.000]  And that case is still going on in court right now.
[01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  So basically, that was like a power move.
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  Like, oh, thank you for protecting me through all my other suits.
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:38.000]  Now that you and the other judge know, I'm the master.
[01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  That has got to be fun. You sound like you're enjoying yourself.
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:53.000]  Especially you just turned my $75,000 suit into a $750,000 suit by law.
[01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:57.000]  You wrote it down. You wrote it down. You wrote the bar down.
[01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:01.000]  That's the evidence. You're telling the court that this is how much my stuff is worth.
[01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  Okay. Are you familiar with the term collateral estoppel?
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  I heard of it before.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  Okay. This goes to collateral estoppel.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  If you go into court and you take a position on a certain set of facts,
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:29.000]  you cannot subsequently go into another court and take a different position on that same set of facts.
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:36.000]  For instance, I filed a quiet title action against a Wells Fargo.
[01:48:36.000 --> 01:48:39.000]  They're trying to foreclose on this property.
[01:48:39.000 --> 01:48:49.000]  They filed a response stating that the judge should dismiss the case because Wells Fargo was not the lender.
[01:48:49.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  Whoa. Now, the lawyer made a mistake.
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  Wells Fargo was the servicer.
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:10.000]  But the mistake that the lawyer made was that Wells Fargo stands in the shoes of the lender.
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  So he is the same as the lender.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  So when he said Wells Fargo is not the lender,
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  the last thing I wanted to do was give him opportunity to take that back.
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  So I non-suited immediately.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  Now, that's collateral estoppel.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  He can never come back into court and say that he is the lender in the case or the agent for the lender
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:43.000]  because he stands in the shoes of the lender.
[01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  He was the agent when he said he wasn't the lender.
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:50.000]  He can't come in ever again and say he is.
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  So how does that work in my case?
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:50:02.000]  In your case where the attorney general said that these automobiles were worth a quarter of a million dollars,
[01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:05.000]  he can't change that.
[01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  You took action based on his statement.
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:16.000]  You relied on his statement and you took action.
[01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  If you hadn't done anything, he could say, oh, oops, I made a mistake and correct it.
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  No harm, no foul.
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  But since you relied on his statement and then filed an action,
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:33.000]  now he's subject to collateral estoppel.
[01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  He can't come back and say, oh, wait, we added an extra zero or we added two extra zeros.
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  He can't come back and do that.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:47.000]  He's subject to collateral estoppel.
[01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:49.000]  I understand the concept without knowing the word,
[01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:53.000]  but now you tell me where to go if I got to slap that.
[01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:58.000]  But I don't think I'm going to have to slap that on because I wrote those two papers up.
[01:50:58.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  She was looking at me like I was a killer.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:03.000]  She was looking at me like this man is going to go through all the way.
[01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  He's going to take all our money.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  He's going to do something real big to the city.
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:13.000]  She was looking like she just stopped and looked at me like what the heck is going on?
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:18.000]  This is exactly what they need on occasion.
[01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  And if he's not, it's only two judges, right?
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  So now if I have this judge up a pit, up under me, now this judge knows he can't move.
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:30.000]  You have to do everything that the law says by it because Mr. Olivier knows it better than you.
[01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:36.000]  Now you understand that Mr. Olivier has at least 10 more suits that he's going to run down your throat.
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  What are you going to do? You're going to follow the law? Yes, you are.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  You're going to allow me to do everything that I want to do because I'm pro se? Yes, you are.
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:48.000]  Because I already have charges against you.
[01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  I already wrote it like I wrote it like a mini suit.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  That's why she came out the corner crazy like whoa, he is not playing.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:52:00.000]  I'm used to reading this. This is a little mini suit.
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  And then he's giving them an opportunity to correct.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  That means for them to correct it, he has to have his property by next week.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  I want all my property, all my land by next week or I'm going to terrorize him.
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  I'm not going to remove you from the bench. No, I got you by the neck.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  Okay, one thing that you're going to run into, you're becoming pretty sophisticated.
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:44.000]  And you're going to want your friends and the people who know you to be able to have the kind of power and influence that you're developing.
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  But you're going to be horribly disappointed.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  There's only about, from my experience, there's only about two percent of the people who can actually do this.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:53:04.000]  And this is not a negative statement about everybody else because everybody has their own focus.
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:09.000]  And most of the people I know could never do what I'm doing.
[01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:17.000]  And it frustrates me because I see them suffering unnecessarily, but their focus is somewhere else.
[01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  And I'm just giving you fair warning when you try to help your friends be able to do what you're able to do.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  And they can't quite get there. Don't be disappointed in them and don't feel bad toward them.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:43.000]  Oh, I let that go because I realized that change started at home.
[01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  So I'm changing my reality. Everybody's seeing me do all these things. I don't talk about it no more. I just do it now.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:54.000]  Now everybody's like, whoa, you know what I'm saying? They see me keep on getting arrested.
[01:53:54.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  And I jump right out. I'm riding my car, driving right past the cops. They're like, yo, what's going on?
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  I got money, man. I love this. This is money. But now they're going through the process. They've seen it.
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:08.000]  I don't focus on other people anymore. If they ask me for assistance, I give it to them.
[01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  But as far as putting it out there, I'm like, no, what I'm going to do is I'm going to hurt the city so bad that I do it for everybody.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  I called the code department today and I told them if I see them anywhere near private property, I'm going to file a recode suit on their department this time.
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:42.000]  You are definitely a kid. You're a man after my own heart. This is why I do this show, because everyone wants to come across someone like this.
[01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:51.000]  Yeah. I'm going to do it very hard so everyone else can get off of it. Then, you know, I was going to start a program or people are listening.
[01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  But before people were listening, they were looking at me like I was crazy. I was a criminal.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:03.000]  Even the clerks, like when I was fighting my cases, were like, what are you submitting this for? Everybody got to have a driver.
[01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  You're crazy. We're crazy. Now I've got three lawsuits in there every time I go, hey, Mr. Levy, are you all right?
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  I'm like, hey. I'm like, wow, this is cool. This is the same people who thought I was crazy.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  I'm really pleased with the progress that you're making. Actually, I'm kind of intimidated.
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  You're a lot more aggressive than I tend to be, and that's surprising.
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  That lady came around the corner and already knew it, like Mr. Levy is rich. He doesn't set them up. There's only two judges. They can't do anything.
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:48.000]  They have to follow everything he says. I have never seen somebody come up here and tell the judge what to do.
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  I'm giving you an opportunity to correct. If not, I'm going to ring you through here and I'm going to keep you on the case.
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  I'm not a peer to nothing. You think you can make me jump the roof? No. I love this. Thank you, man. Hey, I'm going to donate so much money.
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  Be careful, though. Every once in a while, they come back and try to sting you.
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  I just had an incident a couple of days ago where I was trying to get some records from the district clerks in Tarrant County.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:33.000]  They wound up with a half a dozen deputies, bailiffs around me, and one of them walked up and bumped into me with his chest.
[01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:40.000]  When I tried to turn away from him, he moved around and stayed in front of me so I couldn't get away from him.
[01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  Clearly, he was trying to get me to react to him so they could beat me into unconsciousness.
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:52.000]  This went on for quite a while. I finally got to a chair and sat down.
[01:56:52.000 --> 01:57:00.000]  One of the other deputies was watching the bailiffs. Apparently, he was concerned. He didn't like what he was seeing.
[01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  I was trying to get to my cell phone, and he kept blocking me. If I tried to push around him, he would arrest me immediately, and I knew that.
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  This other bailiff said, was this what you needed? He gave me a stack of papers and my cell phone on it.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:23.000]  I said, yes, it was. Thank you very much. I called 911 immediately.
[01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  When I called 911 and I was talking to the dispatcher, then they kind of backed off, but that was really harried.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  These guys were clearly trying to get me to respond to them in a way that they could beat me into unconsciousness, if not shoot me.
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:49.000]  You need to be careful. Things can get out of hand if you're not really in control.
[01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  That's the thing. I'm in control. I've been listening to him. Number one, I'm a fighter.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  Number two, the way that I've been coming at them, they don't want to see me because they know I'm going to jump out of the car and be in their face.
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  This is not a normal event, so they already know. Plus, I have the chief on the chopping block.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  I have the chief, the mayor. When they see me, they don't want nothing to do with me.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  Wonderful. That's when you know you're winning. OK, I am afraid we are out of time. Thank you, Olivier, and keep us up to date.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  This is Randy Kelton, the ruler of our radio on this Friday, the 9th day of September 2016. Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:46.000]  We'll be back next Thursday at the same time, 8 p.m. Central Time for our two-hour show, and then again next Friday for our eight-hour show.
[01:58:46.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Make sure you check in on Monday at 8 o'clock for 83.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:11.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.