ROL_2016-07-29_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.840]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[00:05.840 --> 00:13.440]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.440 --> 00:17.800]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:17.800 --> 00:24.400]  Markets for Wednesday, the 27th of July, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,327.05
[00:24.400 --> 00:31.880]  an ounce, silver $19.95 an ounce, Texas crude $42.92 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:31.880 --> 00:40.860]  sitting at about $658 U.S. currency.
[00:40.860 --> 00:46.260]  Today in history, the year 1929, the Geneva Convention dealing with the treatment of prisoners
[00:46.260 --> 00:48.800]  of war is signed by 53 nations.
[00:48.800 --> 00:52.600]  Its provisions dealt mostly with the capture and captivity of prisoners of war and the
[00:52.600 --> 00:55.560]  classification and treatment of civilians during war.
[00:55.560 --> 01:03.480]  The 1929 Geneva Convention agreement was signed today in history.
[01:03.480 --> 01:09.040]  In recent news, Julian Assange, via his anonymous whistleblower site, Wikileaks, released 20,000
[01:09.040 --> 01:13.320]  hacked emails from the Democratic National Convention on Friday, July 22nd, days before
[01:13.320 --> 01:17.040]  the commencement of the convention on Monday, allowing it to be disseminated and read over
[01:17.040 --> 01:18.040]  the weekend.
[01:18.040 --> 01:21.360]  The emails were so embarrassingly damning that they resulted in Debbie Schultz, the
[01:21.360 --> 01:25.840]  chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, resigning on Sunday, a day before the opening
[01:25.840 --> 01:26.840]  ceremonies.
[01:26.840 --> 01:30.360]  Amongst the litany of embarrassing emails leaked by Wikileaks, there were emails from
[01:30.360 --> 01:36.760]  January 2015 to May 2016 where DNC staff essentially preselected Hillary for the nomination discussing
[01:36.760 --> 01:41.440]  how to deal with Bernie Sanders in order to ensure Clinton's nomination long before any
[01:41.440 --> 01:42.720]  votes had been cast.
[01:42.720 --> 01:46.680]  The bulk of released emails come from seven prominent DNC staff members, senior advisor
[01:46.680 --> 01:52.160]  Andrew Wright, national finance director Jordan Kaplan, finance chief of staff Scott Comer,
[01:52.160 --> 01:56.480]  Northern California finance director Robert Stowe, finance director of data and strategic
[01:56.480 --> 02:01.440]  initiatives Daniel Parrish, finance director Alan Zachary, and Miranda.
[02:01.440 --> 02:05.160]  Amongst the emails was one dated May 5th where the chief financial officer of the Democratic
[02:05.160 --> 02:09.640]  National Committee, Brad Marshall, suggested attacking Sanders over his Jewish heritage,
[02:09.640 --> 02:12.120]  contrasted to his atheistic tendencies.
[02:12.120 --> 02:16.560]  This Wikileak release comes weeks after hacker Guccifer 2.0 had released several internal
[02:16.560 --> 02:21.640]  memos showing that the DNC staff were strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee as
[02:21.640 --> 02:23.540]  early as March 2015.
[02:23.540 --> 02:28.160]  This release was followed by a class action lawsuit against Debbie Schultz and the DNC
[02:28.160 --> 02:31.080]  in June by Florida-based law firm Beck and Lee.
[02:31.080 --> 02:35.480]  If this wasn't enough, an email dated May 6th from the DNC digital office and Obama
[02:35.480 --> 02:40.280]  campaign veteran Rebecca Christopher read, quote, attached to the script for a new video
[02:40.280 --> 02:44.520]  we'd like to use to mop up some of the more Taco Bull engagement and demonstrate that
[02:44.520 --> 02:46.480]  Trump actually isn't trying.
[02:46.480 --> 02:50.720]  It is yet unclear whether she was referring to Donald Trump's Cinco de Mayo tweet or to
[02:50.720 --> 02:54.200]  the Hispanic voting constituents as the Taco Bell engagement.
[02:54.200 --> 03:22.760]  This was Rook Rody with your lowdown for July 27th, 2016.
[03:25.200 --> 03:26.200]  Okay.
[03:26.200 --> 03:27.200]  Howdy, howdy.
[03:27.200 --> 03:28.200]  Randy Kelton.
[03:28.200 --> 03:29.200]  Vet Pack.
[03:29.200 --> 03:30.200]  Good of my radio.
[03:30.200 --> 03:35.200]  I'm afraid we don't have that for one more week.
[03:35.200 --> 03:41.200]  She's in the process of setting up a new business and took longer than expected.
[03:41.200 --> 03:44.200]  So we will have her next week.
[03:44.200 --> 03:46.200]  I apologize for that.
[03:46.200 --> 03:48.200]  I sure miss her being here.
[03:48.200 --> 03:53.200]  I know you probably get tired of my long monologues.
[03:53.200 --> 03:58.200]  Speaking of which, I'm going to start on a monologue.
[03:58.200 --> 04:00.200]  First, I'm going to turn on the phone lines.
[04:00.200 --> 04:04.200]  So anyone who has a question or comment, give us a call.
[04:04.200 --> 04:10.200]  512-646-1984 will be taking your calls all night.
[04:10.200 --> 04:17.200]  And I'm going to start out by talking about a new project that I am in the process of
[04:17.200 --> 04:20.200]  implementing.
[04:20.200 --> 04:27.200]  I've set up a website, thelawsociety.net.
[04:27.200 --> 04:35.200]  Now, if you go anywhere in the world except the United States, and you mention the Law
[04:35.200 --> 04:44.200]  Society, that means the Bar Association, the Association of Lawyers, or Barristers, or
[04:44.200 --> 04:45.200]  Solicitors.
[04:45.200 --> 04:50.200]  Everywhere in the world, almost, it's called the Law Society.
[04:50.200 --> 04:55.200]  If you do a search for the Law Society, you won't get the lawsociety.net.
[04:55.200 --> 05:02.200]  You'll get lawsociety.org, and that's the Law Society in England.
[05:02.200 --> 05:04.200]  So I was able to get the name.
[05:04.200 --> 05:05.200]  Nobody had registered it.
[05:05.200 --> 05:07.200]  So I got the lawsociety.net.
[05:07.200 --> 05:12.200]  And on that, I'm setting up a paralegal service.
[05:12.200 --> 05:14.200]  I should have done this years ago.
[05:14.200 --> 05:19.200]  This is essentially what we're doing on the air, is a paralegal service.
[05:19.200 --> 05:26.200]  And the primary reason I'm setting up the paralegal service, and I'm offering a number
[05:26.200 --> 05:32.200]  of services, but the primary one, it's kind of hidden at the bottom, is I'm going to
[05:32.200 --> 05:37.200]  start doing audits of cases.
[05:37.200 --> 05:44.200]  I do an audit of a case if you're thinking of hiring a lawyer.
[05:44.200 --> 05:45.200]  I audit the case.
[05:45.200 --> 05:52.200]  Now, if you listen to the advertisements for Dr. Frederick Graves in Jurisdictionary,
[05:52.200 --> 05:57.200]  he said, the advertisement speaks to know what your lawyer should be doing for you.
[05:57.200 --> 06:00.200]  Well, that's the purpose of the audit.
[06:00.200 --> 06:07.200]  When you hire the lawyer, with an audit in hand, you know what he should be doing for
[06:07.200 --> 06:08.200]  you.
[06:08.200 --> 06:13.200]  And if you listen to the show much, you'll understand that he's not going to be doing
[06:13.200 --> 06:18.200]  for you what he should be doing for you, and you'll understand the reason why.
[06:18.200 --> 06:22.200]  It's not because he doesn't want to adjudicate your case.
[06:22.200 --> 06:27.200]  It's because he's more afraid of the judge than he is of you.
[06:27.200 --> 06:33.200]  So we get you an audit going in, and then you make the lawyer more afraid of you than
[06:33.200 --> 06:35.200]  he is the judge.
[06:35.200 --> 06:41.200]  Then you can press the lawyer into using his relationship with the opposing counsel and
[06:41.200 --> 06:48.200]  the judge to cover his behind from a difficult client.
[06:48.200 --> 06:56.200]  And if you've already been through a case, bankruptcy, foreclosure, any kind of lawsuit
[06:56.200 --> 07:03.200]  where you are either the plaintiff or the defendant, and you hired counsel, we will
[07:03.200 --> 07:05.200]  audit the case.
[07:05.200 --> 07:12.200]  We will tell you what the lawyer should have done, show you what he didn't do, show you
[07:12.200 --> 07:22.200]  why he should have done it, and the output document will be in the form of a malpractice
[07:22.200 --> 07:24.200]  suit against the lawyer.
[07:24.200 --> 07:28.200]  This is the real reason.
[07:28.200 --> 07:34.200]  Everything I do here is about fixing the system.
[07:34.200 --> 07:41.200]  And I've listened to these lawyers advertise, oh, if you've used talcum powder, call us.
[07:41.200 --> 07:43.200]  If you've breathed the air, call us.
[07:43.200 --> 07:47.200]  We'll sue somebody.
[07:47.200 --> 07:53.200]  Constantly you hear lawyers trying to get you to call them so they can sue somebody
[07:53.200 --> 07:56.200]  for anything they can think of.
[07:56.200 --> 08:04.200]  And for a long time I've been thinking, why isn't anybody suing lawyers?
[08:04.200 --> 08:11.200]  Everybody calls in here and talks about what a horrible mess lawyers make of their cases
[08:11.200 --> 08:16.200]  and how they throw them under the bus, and nobody's suing the lawyers.
[08:16.200 --> 08:22.200]  When a lawyer takes on a case, first thing he looks for is deep pockets.
[08:22.200 --> 08:26.200]  Where are some deep pockets I can get into?
[08:26.200 --> 08:31.200]  First he looks at you to see how deep your pockets are so he can calculate how much he
[08:31.200 --> 08:33.200]  can squeeze out of you.
[08:33.200 --> 08:39.200]  Then he looks at the defendant to see how deep their pockets are or see who's associated
[08:39.200 --> 08:43.200]  with the defendant that he can draw into the case and get into their deep pockets.
[08:43.200 --> 08:45.200]  He's always looking for deep pockets.
[08:45.200 --> 08:49.200]  Well, the lawyer has some pretty deep pockets.
[08:49.200 --> 08:54.200]  Most all of them carry errors in admissions policies.
[08:54.200 --> 09:02.200]  So when you sue the lawyer, the lawyer doesn't get to call these shots because the lawyer
[09:02.200 --> 09:04.200]  is not going to represent himself in the defense.
[09:04.200 --> 09:09.200]  He's going to get another lawyer and most likely his insurance carrier is going to hire
[09:09.200 --> 09:12.200]  a lawyer to represent him.
[09:12.200 --> 09:20.200]  And then the insurance company's lawyer is as likely to throw the lawyer under the bus
[09:20.200 --> 09:26.200]  as your lawyer was likely to throw you under the bus if it means they can get out from
[09:26.200 --> 09:29.200]  under part of the liability.
[09:29.200 --> 09:40.200]  So a malpractice suit is a very powerful tool that we can use to help lawyers get past this
[09:40.200 --> 09:42.200]  sphere of judges.
[09:42.200 --> 09:47.200]  They're afraid to adjudicate your suit because they don't want to annoy the judge.
[09:47.200 --> 09:53.200]  They don't want to file a pleading that they haven't filed before because they might make
[09:53.200 --> 09:55.200]  a mistake and get sanctioned.
[09:55.200 --> 10:03.200]  So we put them in a position to where it's far more dangerous not to actively adjudicate
[10:03.200 --> 10:10.200]  a case than it is to file pleadings the judge hasn't seen before.
[10:10.200 --> 10:12.200]  I've got a couple callers, so that's my story.
[10:12.200 --> 10:13.200]  I'm sticking to it.
[10:13.200 --> 10:20.200]  I hope by next week I'll have a banner up on the website and anything that I make doing
[10:20.200 --> 10:27.200]  these audits, I'm going to put a good portion of it back to the radio station to help support
[10:27.200 --> 10:28.200]  the radio station.
[10:28.200 --> 10:32.200]  We're ending our fundraiser this week and we've extended it considerably because we
[10:32.200 --> 10:37.200]  just haven't got enough to keep this station going.
[10:37.200 --> 10:43.200]  And we're struggling to keep it up, so maybe this will help pull in some funds to help
[10:43.200 --> 10:44.200]  support this network.
[10:44.200 --> 10:46.200]  Okay, we're going to go to callers.
[10:46.200 --> 10:48.200]  We have two callers on the board.
[10:48.200 --> 10:49.200]  We have Kathy from Texas.
[10:49.200 --> 10:50.200]  Hello, Kathy.
[10:50.200 --> 10:51.200]  Well, hello, Randy.
[10:51.200 --> 10:54.200]  I just wanted to touch base with you.
[10:54.200 --> 10:56.200]  I got your email.
[10:56.200 --> 10:58.200]  Sorry about that.
[10:58.200 --> 11:07.200]  But I was looking on, just as sort of an information for people, I was looking on the Travis County
[11:07.200 --> 11:14.200]  records office and you had told me to look up all the deeds and things that had been
[11:14.200 --> 11:17.200]  filed on my house because we were going to discuss that.
[11:17.200 --> 11:22.200]  But what was interesting was I started looking and I put in the search terms and absolutely
[11:22.200 --> 11:23.200]  nothing came up.
[11:23.200 --> 11:25.200]  And I thought, this isn't right.
[11:25.200 --> 11:32.200]  You know, it's like, okay, so I called the office and the lady said, oh, you put in too
[11:32.200 --> 11:33.200]  many search terms.
[11:33.200 --> 11:34.200]  Just put in one word.
[11:34.200 --> 11:35.200]  It's like, huh?
[11:35.200 --> 11:36.200]  What?
[11:36.200 --> 11:37.200]  Okay.
[11:37.200 --> 11:44.200]  So it seems that if you put in enough information that normal search engines would give you
[11:44.200 --> 11:48.200]  specific information, it just doesn't go anywhere.
[11:48.200 --> 11:55.200]  So if you're really looking for stuff, you need to do multiple searches and you can do
[11:55.200 --> 11:56.200]  one name at a time.
[11:56.200 --> 11:58.200]  I did my husband's name first.
[11:58.200 --> 11:59.200]  I did my name.
[11:59.200 --> 12:01.200]  I did the seller of my house.
[12:01.200 --> 12:02.200]  I did their name.
[12:02.200 --> 12:08.200]  And each time I got a different document and it's all documents that I needed.
[12:08.200 --> 12:14.200]  But if I put two names or if I put an address and a name, I didn't get anything.
[12:14.200 --> 12:15.200]  Okay.
[12:15.200 --> 12:19.200]  Let me give you a suggestion.
[12:19.200 --> 12:24.200]  Always search by your last name, then first name.
[12:24.200 --> 12:29.200]  And you can go down to the bottom and tell it what kind of document you want.
[12:29.200 --> 12:34.200]  But I never do that unless I'm looking for a trustee's deed or something.
[12:34.200 --> 12:39.200]  I put in last name, first name, then it'll give you a list of documents.
[12:39.200 --> 12:42.200]  I always look for the deed of trust.
[12:42.200 --> 12:46.200]  You click on the deed of trust and open it up.
[12:46.200 --> 12:54.200]  And once it's open, on the left-hand side up at the top, there's a link for related
[12:54.200 --> 12:56.200]  documents.
[12:56.200 --> 12:58.200]  I click that.
[12:58.200 --> 13:05.200]  And that will tend to give you any documents filed subsequent to or that name this deed
[13:05.200 --> 13:07.200]  of trust.
[13:07.200 --> 13:11.200]  That'll get you most of the stuff that's been filed.
[13:11.200 --> 13:12.200]  Okay.
[13:12.200 --> 13:15.200]  So with that, you said most.
[13:15.200 --> 13:16.200]  Okay.
[13:16.200 --> 13:18.200]  So it's a good place to start.
[13:18.200 --> 13:19.200]  Yeah.
[13:19.200 --> 13:21.200]  It took me a while to get that one figured out.
[13:21.200 --> 13:27.200]  Well, the other interesting item I've found about it, I went back to download some that
[13:27.200 --> 13:30.200]  I had just made notes of.
[13:30.200 --> 13:36.200]  And the Travis County Records Office is offline until Monday.
[13:36.200 --> 13:42.200]  So you can't even search anything this week until Monday.
[13:42.200 --> 13:43.200]  That's annoying.
[13:43.200 --> 13:49.200]  But fortunately, Travis County is one of the counties that will let you download stuff
[13:49.200 --> 13:53.200]  without charging you a dollar a page.
[13:53.200 --> 13:56.200]  And I have to bring the page up to tell you exactly how to do it.
[13:56.200 --> 14:03.200]  There's a way you can directly download the documents from the page.
[14:03.200 --> 14:08.200]  The next time you start looking, if you'll call me, I'll kind of walk you through how
[14:08.200 --> 14:10.200]  to do it.
[14:10.200 --> 14:17.200]  Tarrant County and Travis County use exactly the same software.
[14:17.200 --> 14:21.200]  Dallas County, however, holy mackerel.
[14:21.200 --> 14:25.200]  You can only look at one or two pages.
[14:25.200 --> 14:28.200]  And they charge you a dollar a page for every page you download.
[14:28.200 --> 14:33.200]  That gets really expensive, really fast.
[14:33.200 --> 14:34.200]  Yeah.
[14:34.200 --> 14:39.200]  I think I have like 22 pages or something on the ones that I just found.
[14:39.200 --> 14:40.200]  Yeah.
[14:40.200 --> 14:49.200]  And one of the things that's on our long-term agenda is suing the clerk for using the website
[14:49.200 --> 14:53.200]  as a source of income.
[14:53.200 --> 14:55.200]  There you go.
[14:55.200 --> 15:01.200]  That seemed appropriate for them to charge me for what I've already paid for.
[15:01.200 --> 15:03.200]  That's right.
[15:03.200 --> 15:09.200]  And what I'm looking at is eventually doing a private attorney general suit against the
[15:09.200 --> 15:11.200]  clerk.
[15:11.200 --> 15:12.200]  Okay.
[15:12.200 --> 15:15.200]  I'll prove that for you.
[15:15.200 --> 15:20.200]  Dallas County is going to be a great one to do it, too, because theirs is probably the
[15:20.200 --> 15:25.200]  most difficult software to get through and the most restrictive.
[15:25.200 --> 15:26.200]  They charge you for searches.
[15:26.200 --> 15:29.200]  They charge you for everything.
[15:29.200 --> 15:32.200]  It's the most expensive I've ever looked at.
[15:32.200 --> 15:35.200]  It makes it almost prohibitive.
[15:35.200 --> 15:44.200]  So I want to go on, log on, pay for some, and then go back and sue them for what they
[15:44.200 --> 15:47.200]  charge me and what they charge everybody else.
[15:47.200 --> 15:48.200]  Right.
[15:48.200 --> 15:51.200]  That's what you sue for.
[15:51.200 --> 15:57.200]  And then we have some of the smaller counties that are using a third-party vendor.
[15:57.200 --> 16:01.200]  The county of Amiens is a real small county.
[16:01.200 --> 16:04.200]  And they use a third-party vendor.
[16:04.200 --> 16:11.200]  And it's questionable whether they can do that, since the legislation requires the clerk
[16:11.200 --> 16:16.200]  now to make their records available online.
[16:16.200 --> 16:23.200]  It's questionable whether they can turn that into a profitable venture.
[16:23.200 --> 16:28.200]  That wouldn't seem right to me, but of course.
[16:28.200 --> 16:35.200]  Well, it's a question I want to raise, and maybe in time we can get them to straighten
[16:35.200 --> 16:36.200]  all this out.
[16:36.200 --> 16:37.200]  It's all new.
[16:37.200 --> 16:42.200]  So it's going to have some glitches, and they're going to try to screw us every opportunity
[16:42.200 --> 16:43.200]  we get.
[16:43.200 --> 16:45.200]  So we'll have to fight them.
[16:45.200 --> 16:46.200]  Hang on.
[16:46.200 --> 16:47.200]  We're about to go to break.
[16:47.200 --> 16:50.200]  This is Randy Kelton, VETPAC, Rue de la Radio.
[16:50.200 --> 16:53.200]  Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:53.200 --> 17:00.200]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.200 --> 17:06.200]  Non-GMOsolutions.com is now a proud sponsor of the Logos Radio Network with promo code
[17:06.200 --> 17:07.200]  Logos.
[17:07.200 --> 17:12.200]  We thank you for the opportunity to be your source for new man of foods, the leader in
[17:12.200 --> 17:15.200]  high quality food that you will truly enjoy.
[17:15.200 --> 17:20.200]  You'll find gluten-free options, and all products are free from high fructose corn syrup, aspartame,
[17:20.200 --> 17:21.200]  soy, and MSG.
[17:21.200 --> 17:27.200]  Whether you're on a tight budget, looking for options to reduce food costs without compromising
[17:27.200 --> 17:33.200]  health, or securing long-term 25-year storable food for an uncertain future, then non-GMOsolutions.com
[17:33.200 --> 17:35.200]  is your common sense answer.
[17:35.200 --> 17:39.200]  Take advantage of a 10% discount with promo code Logos.
[17:39.200 --> 17:44.200]  No longer will you compromise taste and quality for full-term shelf life, or eat poor quality
[17:44.200 --> 17:45.200]  food due to cost.
[17:45.200 --> 17:50.200]  Check out our FlexPay options and design a no-contract plan to satisfy your needs.
[17:50.200 --> 17:55.200]  Go to non-GMOsolutions.com today and get 10% off with promo code Logos.
[17:55.200 --> 18:00.200]  That's non-GMOsolutions.com with promo code Logos.
[18:00.200 --> 18:06.200]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network
[18:06.200 --> 18:10.200]  on top of the on-air talent, producers, and other hardworking individuals working behind
[18:10.200 --> 18:11.200]  the scenes?
[18:11.200 --> 18:15.200]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[18:15.200 --> 18:20.200]  And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year in our annual fundraisers,
[18:20.200 --> 18:23.200]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[18:23.200 --> 18:27.200]  Head on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com to make your contribution.
[18:27.200 --> 18:32.200]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[18:32.200 --> 18:37.200]  First prize being a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver, second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[18:37.200 --> 18:39.200]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[18:39.200 --> 18:43.200]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary
[18:43.200 --> 18:45.200]  jar of My Magic Mud.
[18:45.200 --> 18:50.200]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[18:50.200 --> 18:52.200]  The Logos Radio Network fundraiser.
[18:52.200 --> 18:56.200]  Head on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the
[18:56.200 --> 19:24.200]  Logos Radio Network on the air.
[19:24.200 --> 19:26.200]  OK, we are back.
[19:26.200 --> 19:29.200]  Randy Kelton is back with the radio.
[19:29.200 --> 19:32.200]  And it looks like Kathy dropped off during the break.
[19:32.200 --> 19:36.200]  OK, we're going to go to Joseph in New York.
[19:36.200 --> 19:38.200]  Hello, Joseph.
[19:38.200 --> 19:40.200]  Hello.
[19:40.200 --> 19:51.200]  I have a few just basic questions so that I know how to proceed here.
[19:51.200 --> 19:52.200]  Let's see.
[19:52.200 --> 20:05.200]  The first one, this has to do with my vehicle traffic citations that I got.
[20:05.200 --> 20:16.200]  When I was researching the judges that have presided over the case, I found that the county
[20:16.200 --> 20:25.200]  judge who's sitting in a court of record has been delinquent.
[20:25.200 --> 20:27.200]  His bar status is delinquent.
[20:27.200 --> 20:31.200]  It has been so for a year as of this month.
[20:31.200 --> 20:40.200]  Oh, well, once the judge is elected to the bench, he's no longer a practicing lawyer,
[20:40.200 --> 20:43.200]  so he doesn't need to maintain his bar status.
[20:43.200 --> 20:54.200]  Well, I was wondering, being a judge of a court of record, if his bar status would matter
[20:54.200 --> 21:01.200]  because, I mean, from what I've gathered, basically you've got to be a member of the
[21:01.200 --> 21:02.200]  bar in good standing.
[21:02.200 --> 21:06.200]  So I wondered if there was any significance to that.
[21:06.200 --> 21:15.200]  No, they have to be a lawyer before they can run for the office.
[21:15.200 --> 21:21.200]  But once they secure their office, they're not practicing law anymore, so they don't
[21:21.200 --> 21:23.200]  have to maintain their bar cards.
[21:23.200 --> 21:26.200]  Most judges don't.
[21:26.200 --> 21:27.200]  Okay.
[21:27.200 --> 21:31.200]  That's interesting.
[21:31.200 --> 21:37.200]  But that would affect his ability to engage in his private practice, wouldn't it?
[21:37.200 --> 21:38.200]  Right.
[21:38.200 --> 21:43.200]  And most elected judges do not engage in private practice.
[21:43.200 --> 21:49.200]  Some do if it's a real small jurisdiction where they don't have much work to do, but
[21:49.200 --> 21:51.200]  it's very rare.
[21:51.200 --> 21:58.200]  They can, and if they were, then they would maintain their license and their bar card,
[21:58.200 --> 22:01.200]  but they would be restricted in the cases they could hear.
[22:01.200 --> 22:07.200]  They couldn't hear a case that would potentially come before their court.
[22:07.200 --> 22:13.200]  I mean, like if it was a Wise County judge here, he could practice in Tarrant County,
[22:13.200 --> 22:16.200]  but he couldn't take any cases in Wise County.
[22:16.200 --> 22:18.200]  Oh, okay.
[22:18.200 --> 22:22.200]  Well, that's good to know.
[22:22.200 --> 22:23.200]  Let's see.
[22:23.200 --> 22:38.200]  The next question I had has to do with an issue I have with the property tax department.
[22:38.200 --> 22:51.200]  Now, I'm basically battling them over their authority to tax my private property, my personal
[22:51.200 --> 23:02.200]  property, and they sought to get a tax deed against my property.
[23:02.200 --> 23:10.200]  And I found out that they took it before a judge, and he just basically signed it.
[23:10.200 --> 23:13.200]  There was no hearing.
[23:13.200 --> 23:18.200]  He signed along with some other properties.
[23:18.200 --> 23:30.200]  And so there's nothing on the record that shows that they had jurisdiction to do so.
[23:30.200 --> 23:33.200]  So sue the judge.
[23:33.200 --> 23:34.200]  Exactly.
[23:34.200 --> 23:40.200]  Okay, so that's why I was going to ask you, what was the best thing to do, just to flat
[23:40.200 --> 23:41.200]  out sue him?
[23:41.200 --> 23:44.200]  Yes, send a tort letter to the judge.
[23:44.200 --> 23:47.200]  Okay, here's how jurisdiction works.
[23:47.200 --> 23:55.200]  When the plaintiff comes before the court and pleas jurisdiction, the court will accept
[23:55.200 --> 24:02.200]  the plaintiff's statement as true on its face.
[24:02.200 --> 24:10.200]  And so there is the presumption that what the plaintiff pleads is true until it's challenged.
[24:10.200 --> 24:18.200]  And the plaintiff's statements asserting jurisdiction are presumed to be true, so the
[24:18.200 --> 24:20.200]  judge presumes he has jurisdiction.
[24:20.200 --> 24:28.200]  Once you challenge it, that presumption is lost, and the judge at that point loses subject
[24:28.200 --> 24:31.200]  matter jurisdiction.
[24:31.200 --> 24:39.200]  And here are judges, I'm surprised at how many judges don't understand the nature of
[24:39.200 --> 24:40.200]  the claim.
[24:40.200 --> 24:42.200]  They say, of course I have jurisdiction.
[24:42.200 --> 24:46.200]  I have jurisdiction over these cases in this venue.
[24:46.200 --> 24:49.200]  And we're saying, no, no, that's not what we're claiming.
[24:49.200 --> 24:57.200]  We're claiming that you don't have what in Wisconsin they called competence.
[24:57.200 --> 25:06.200]  It's hard to call a judge incompetent because he tends to take that meaning that he's incapable
[25:06.200 --> 25:09.200]  personally of doing something.
[25:09.200 --> 25:20.200]  What it really means is he's legally incompetent as the plaintiff lacks either agency standing
[25:20.200 --> 25:26.200]  or the legal capacity to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction to the court, or that
[25:26.200 --> 25:33.200]  the pleading was insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[25:33.200 --> 25:40.200]  So, when you file a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, always try to make that real
[25:40.200 --> 25:42.200]  clear to the judge.
[25:42.200 --> 25:51.200]  We're not challenging your subject matter jurisdiction over the subject matter and the
[25:51.200 --> 25:52.200]  venue.
[25:52.200 --> 25:58.200]  We're challenging the ability of the plaintiff to invoke your subject matter jurisdiction.
[25:58.200 --> 26:07.200]  But once it's lost, it must be proven, it cannot be presumed.
[26:07.200 --> 26:15.200]  This is a threshold issue, meaning that jurisdiction has to be addressed first.
[26:15.200 --> 26:21.200]  There's two things a judge can do when you challenge subject matter jurisdiction.
[26:21.200 --> 26:27.200]  He can hold a hearing on subject matter jurisdiction, or he can dismiss the case.
[26:27.200 --> 26:28.200]  That's it.
[26:28.200 --> 26:33.200]  He can't do anything else other than administrative type things.
[26:33.200 --> 26:36.200]  It doesn't have anything to do with the adjudication of the case.
[26:36.200 --> 26:44.200]  So, if this judge, if you file a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction and your challenge
[26:44.200 --> 26:55.200]  was sufficient, if the court took everything you said as true, then the truth of your statements
[26:55.200 --> 27:03.200]  would amount to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction, then the court lost it and had to prove it.
[27:03.200 --> 27:10.200]  So, if he went ahead anyway, that's the only time you could sue a judge.
[27:10.200 --> 27:11.200]  Yes.
[27:11.200 --> 27:24.200]  So, if there's no response by opposing party, no opposition to your claim that they lacked
[27:24.200 --> 27:31.200]  capacity to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction, the court has to take the movement's statement
[27:31.200 --> 27:32.200]  as true.
[27:32.200 --> 27:37.200]  And if your statement is true, amounted to no jurisdiction, then the court cannot move
[27:37.200 --> 27:38.200]  ahead.
[27:38.200 --> 27:42.200]  It's not opposing party that has to prove jurisdiction.
[27:42.200 --> 27:46.200]  It is the judge.
[27:46.200 --> 27:52.200]  We had a guy that was sued for a credit card issue, but they didn't include a statement
[27:52.200 --> 27:54.200]  of the claim.
[27:54.200 --> 27:58.200]  And in Texas law, it requires a full statement of the claim.
[27:58.200 --> 28:06.200]  There has to be a full, all the bills and what you build out, what you paid back, that
[28:06.200 --> 28:11.200]  all is required by statute to accompany the suit.
[28:11.200 --> 28:13.200]  Well, they didn't include that.
[28:13.200 --> 28:18.200]  So, the guy showed it to me and I looked at it and said, man, these guys don't have a
[28:18.200 --> 28:19.200]  prayer.
[28:19.200 --> 28:21.200]  And he said, well, why not?
[28:21.200 --> 28:22.200]  I don't know.
[28:22.200 --> 28:23.200]  They don't have a prayer.
[28:23.200 --> 28:28.200]  They didn't put the prayer in the suit, among other things.
[28:28.200 --> 28:34.200]  The other thing they didn't do was file that accounting.
[28:34.200 --> 28:38.200]  So, we sued the judge.
[28:38.200 --> 28:45.280]  We filed a challenge subject matter jurisdiction and then sued the judge for exerting or purporting
[28:45.280 --> 28:49.800]  to exert an authority he did not expressly have.
[28:49.800 --> 28:55.800]  But when he found out about the suit, he got the county attorney to write him a response.
[28:55.800 --> 29:02.520]  Well, sorry, Bubba, we sued you in your personal capacity because you didn't have subject matter
[29:02.520 --> 29:03.520]  jurisdiction.
[29:03.520 --> 29:08.440]  And then you get the county attorney to write your answer for you.
[29:08.440 --> 29:12.400]  We sued the county attorney for misappropriation of public funds.
[29:12.400 --> 29:19.000]  Oh, that was great fun.
[29:19.000 --> 29:22.040]  Which goes to a point.
[29:22.040 --> 29:26.840]  What the lawyer on the other side is going to try to do if he can't beat you on the facts,
[29:26.840 --> 29:31.320]  he's going to try to beat you on procedure.
[29:31.320 --> 29:38.280]  That's great fun when you beat them back on procedure.
[29:38.280 --> 29:39.280]  Hang on.
[29:39.280 --> 29:40.680]  About to go to break.
[29:40.680 --> 29:50.840]  Randy Kelton, BetPak, Radio, on this Friday, the 29th day of July 2016, our call lines
[29:50.840 --> 29:51.840]  are open.
[29:51.840 --> 29:55.560]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[29:55.560 --> 29:57.040]  Give us a call.
[29:57.040 --> 30:02.040]  We'll be right back.
[30:02.040 --> 30:05.520]  Jacob Boscov dreamed up the most sinister weapon he could think of.
[30:05.520 --> 30:10.320]  Then he built a prototype and tried to sell it in an international weapons trade show.
[30:10.320 --> 30:11.800]  The results were surprising.
[30:11.800 --> 30:16.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you more in just a moment.
[30:16.240 --> 30:17.840]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.840 --> 30:21.440]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.440 --> 30:26.200]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:26.200 --> 30:31.360]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.360 --> 30:33.980]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.980 --> 30:38.280]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:38.280 --> 30:41.820]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.820 --> 30:45.400]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.400 --> 30:47.480]  Governments can't be trusted with weapons.
[30:47.480 --> 30:52.080]  That's what Danish artist Jacob Boscov discovered when he marketed a fake weapon called the
[30:52.080 --> 30:53.760]  ID sniper rifle.
[30:53.760 --> 30:58.040]  He claimed it would allow government agents to shoot microchip implants into people from
[30:58.040 --> 31:01.240]  a distance and then secretly track them by satellite.
[31:01.240 --> 31:05.080]  The chip was supposed to feel like a mosquito bite and leave no obvious marks.
[31:05.080 --> 31:08.880]  That's a ridiculous notion, but government representatives from around the world bought
[31:08.880 --> 31:11.160]  the concept hook, line, and sinker.
[31:11.160 --> 31:15.600]  Reportedly, Chinese police were extremely interested, as were representatives from several
[31:15.600 --> 31:16.600]  other countries.
[31:16.600 --> 31:20.040]  Governments, they're always looking for new ways to stick it to you.
[31:20.040 --> 31:21.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:21.840 --> 31:24.360]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:24.360 --> 31:34.760]  Did you know there are three million edible food plants on earth, and none have the nutritional
[31:34.760 --> 31:36.440]  value of the hemp plant?
[31:36.440 --> 31:39.040]  HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:39.040 --> 31:44.880]  It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten free.
[31:44.880 --> 31:50.040]  Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds the body the
[31:50.040 --> 31:51.520]  nutrients it needs.
[31:51.520 --> 32:01.960]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at HempUSA.org.
[32:01.960 --> 32:04.880]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:04.880 --> 32:08.600]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going
[32:08.600 --> 32:12.520]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.520 --> 32:15.760]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:15.760 --> 32:19.480]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.480 --> 32:23.640]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:23.640 --> 32:25.120]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.120 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.760]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:32.760 --> 32:34.840]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:34.840 --> 32:39.160]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.160 --> 32:40.480]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.480 --> 32:43.840]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:43.840 --> 32:48.240]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.240 --> 32:50.560]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.560 --> 32:54.520]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.520 --> 33:01.520]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:24.520 --> 33:46.280]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Vet Pack, Rule of Law Radio, and I started the show
[33:46.280 --> 33:49.440]  and I forgot to include the date.
[33:49.440 --> 33:58.600]  It was the 29th day of July 2016, and we're talking to Joseph in New York.
[33:58.600 --> 34:02.440]  And when we went out, we were talking about beating them on procedure.
[34:02.440 --> 34:11.680]  I had a friend lose a case after about six years on a really tiny procedural issue.
[34:11.680 --> 34:14.520]  So if you can beat them on procedure, that'd be great fun.
[34:14.520 --> 34:20.760]  Since the judge didn't follow procedure, it sounds like you got a shot at him.
[34:20.760 --> 34:25.080]  Yeah, well, that's just where I'm going to begin.
[34:25.080 --> 34:26.840]  This is basically my initial attack.
[34:26.840 --> 34:31.040]  There's a lot more that's going to happen later.
[34:31.040 --> 34:36.760]  What I'm attempting to do is to basically wipe out that tax deed to get the process
[34:36.760 --> 34:42.640]  to go back to where they're going to attempt to try to acquire a tax deed again.
[34:42.640 --> 34:51.280]  And at that point, I'm going to attack the tax department for basically lack of contract.
[34:51.280 --> 34:52.520]  Okay, wait a minute.
[34:52.520 --> 34:59.800]  I had a guy years ago, he subsequently went to prison because he pulled a weapon on some
[34:59.800 --> 35:02.360]  federal officers.
[35:02.360 --> 35:05.960]  He was a little bit arrogant and it got away from him.
[35:05.960 --> 35:14.680]  But what he would do is he would send a letter to the tax assessor collector and ask if the
[35:14.680 --> 35:18.720]  county or the state had a claim against his property.
[35:18.720 --> 35:23.400]  He'd do this when his taxes were all paid up.
[35:23.400 --> 35:28.040]  They would send him back a letter saying, no, they don't have a claim against his property.
[35:28.040 --> 35:34.480]  Then he would send back a second letter and ask them to remove his property from the public
[35:34.480 --> 35:38.640]  rolls and move it to the private rolls.
[35:38.640 --> 35:43.920]  And once it was moved to the private rolls, they didn't tax it.
[35:43.920 --> 35:45.440]  You should look at that.
[35:45.440 --> 35:48.280]  This was in New York that he was doing this.
[35:48.280 --> 35:49.420]  That's not my tactic.
[35:49.420 --> 35:59.720]  My tactic was to allow them or to give them the opportunity to declare a claim.
[35:59.720 --> 36:02.880]  Okay, the claim is fraudulent.
[36:02.880 --> 36:05.920]  I have the money to pay my taxes several times over.
[36:05.920 --> 36:08.200]  That's not an issue.
[36:08.200 --> 36:15.320]  I wanted them to come forward with a claim so I could attack the claim and sue them.
[36:15.320 --> 36:16.720]  Oh, this is great.
[36:16.720 --> 36:18.320]  So you're picking the fight.
[36:18.320 --> 36:19.320]  Yes.
[36:19.320 --> 36:22.720]  Oh, that's the best fight to have.
[36:22.720 --> 36:23.720]  Exactly.
[36:23.720 --> 36:32.640]  This has to do with a fellow that I was introduced to down in Florida who retired NASA engineer
[36:32.640 --> 36:41.640]  and he got into law back in 1993 and got into first vehicle traffic and then codes and then
[36:41.640 --> 36:42.640]  property taxes.
[36:42.640 --> 36:47.000]  He got a bunch of people off the tax rolls and then a friend, an old school buddy has
[36:47.000 --> 36:49.520]  lost his home.
[36:49.520 --> 36:57.560]  So they spent a couple of years learning the tax law and then they went after the county
[36:57.560 --> 37:01.760]  and ended up winning his friend like $34 million.
[37:01.760 --> 37:02.760]  Wow.
[37:02.760 --> 37:07.120]  Seizing his house and they had to give him his house back.
[37:07.120 --> 37:12.360]  They had to give him all of his previous monies that he had paid in taxes.
[37:12.360 --> 37:13.360]  It was like 19 years.
[37:13.360 --> 37:20.560]  They had to give him that back and they had to pay the people who acquired the house through
[37:20.560 --> 37:21.560]  the tax sale.
[37:21.560 --> 37:25.440]  They had to pay them a half a million to leave.
[37:25.440 --> 37:28.200]  So they really got creamed.
[37:28.200 --> 37:33.800]  He's been working with me, sending me...
[37:33.800 --> 37:40.640]  You might want to issue this guy an invite to appear as a guest on our show.
[37:40.640 --> 37:43.720]  Okay, I'll do that.
[37:43.720 --> 37:45.720]  He's very much aware of you.
[37:45.720 --> 37:50.400]  You're one of the people he's followed and learned a lot from.
[37:50.400 --> 37:57.600]  He specifically mentioned you when I first came to talk to you or talk to him.
[37:57.600 --> 37:59.440]  That would probably be easy to do.
[37:59.440 --> 38:05.600]  I'll just give him a call if he might not want to do that.
[38:05.600 --> 38:07.160]  Well, good.
[38:07.160 --> 38:13.240]  I want as many knowledgeable people on the show as I can get.
[38:13.240 --> 38:16.040]  Unfortunately, Jeff Sedgwick, we just lost him.
[38:16.040 --> 38:19.040]  He just passed away from cancer.
[38:19.040 --> 38:24.280]  He was one of my most knowledgeable people that used to come on and beat me up all the
[38:24.280 --> 38:29.680]  time, letting me know where I screwed up, and I've lost him.
[38:29.680 --> 38:33.880]  I need somebody else to work me over.
[38:33.880 --> 38:38.000]  I have a question concerning private attorney general suit.
[38:38.000 --> 38:41.440]  That's kind of what I want to go for.
[38:41.440 --> 38:47.280]  I believe I want to stay away from the 1983 because that only has to do with civil rights.
[38:47.280 --> 38:54.240]  1983 is almost exclusively procedural due process.
[38:54.240 --> 39:01.040]  There is some substantive due process, but that's extremely hard to litigate.
[39:01.040 --> 39:06.800]  Almost all are procedural due process, and what you're doing doesn't sound right for
[39:06.800 --> 39:11.880]  procedural due process unless you can show that they're taking your taxes illegally.
[39:11.880 --> 39:20.480]  241, I'm thinking USC 241, 242, and 141, 141 would be-
[39:20.480 --> 39:21.480]  Okay.
[39:21.480 --> 39:26.120]  241, 242, those do not give you a private cause of action.
[39:26.120 --> 39:27.120]  Oh, they don't?
[39:27.120 --> 39:28.120]  No, no.
[39:28.120 --> 39:29.120]  They're criminal.
[39:29.120 --> 39:30.120]  I was misled.
[39:30.120 --> 39:31.120]  Okay.
[39:31.120 --> 39:32.120]  Okay.
[39:32.120 --> 39:37.600]  So what am I under private attorney general?
[39:37.600 --> 39:39.800]  What code am I going to use?
[39:39.800 --> 39:46.560]  Well, you just accused them of improperly collecting the taxes.
[39:46.560 --> 39:53.440]  Now, you can charge them criminally for stealing this money from the public, but that doesn't
[39:53.440 --> 39:55.120]  give you a cause of action.
[39:55.120 --> 40:00.200]  You have to go in and show that they took this money from me and harmed me.
[40:00.200 --> 40:01.200]  Yes.
[40:01.200 --> 40:10.880]  Now, I was talking to a group last Sunday in Georgia, and apparently in Georgia, you
[40:10.880 --> 40:15.960]  still have the right of private prosecution.
[40:15.960 --> 40:25.120]  Most states back in 1865, when they created public prosecutors, they gave the prosecuting
[40:25.120 --> 40:31.800]  attorney exclusive right to prosecute, but apparently they didn't do that in Georgia.
[40:31.800 --> 40:39.760]  See, prior to this time, if you had someone commit a crime against you, the criminal statutes
[40:39.760 --> 40:45.120]  were there, but they didn't have a public prosecutor, so you'd have to hire a lawyer
[40:45.120 --> 40:49.160]  and bring the guy to court and prosecute him yourself.
[40:49.160 --> 40:51.400]  We still do that in Georgia.
[40:51.400 --> 40:55.840]  You might look at the law in New York.
[40:55.840 --> 41:01.320]  That's not something I've looked up in New York to see if you have the right to private
[41:01.320 --> 41:02.320]  prosecution.
[41:02.320 --> 41:03.320]  Generally...
[41:03.320 --> 41:05.320]  At the federal level.
[41:05.320 --> 41:06.320]  Yeah.
[41:06.320 --> 41:07.320]  Okay.
[41:07.320 --> 41:11.200]  Federal level, you don't have a right to...
[41:11.200 --> 41:18.320]  A crime does not give you a cause of action.
[41:18.320 --> 41:24.400]  Now, the results of the crime may give you a cause of action.
[41:24.400 --> 41:28.280]  So you can't sue because they violated this statute.
[41:28.280 --> 41:34.680]  You can sue because in violating this statute, they caused me this harm.
[41:34.680 --> 41:37.160]  Does that make sense?
[41:37.160 --> 41:39.720]  That's exactly where I was going.
[41:39.720 --> 41:40.720]  Oh, okay.
[41:40.720 --> 41:52.560]  Yeah, in that case, and that gives you good strong standing because, statutorily, that's
[41:52.560 --> 41:55.880]  speaking to procedural due process.
[41:55.880 --> 42:00.760]  The public official exerted or purported to exert an authority he didn't have, and in
[42:00.760 --> 42:05.080]  the process denied you the full free access to your enjoyment right.
[42:05.080 --> 42:10.280]  Well, the denial is procedural due process.
[42:10.280 --> 42:14.360]  But it is harm per se.
[42:14.360 --> 42:21.320]  In order to collect under a procedural due process claim, you don't have to show that
[42:21.320 --> 42:23.680]  you've been harmed.
[42:23.680 --> 42:28.880]  A violation of one of your rights by a public official while acting under the color of his
[42:28.880 --> 42:32.200]  authority is harm on its face.
[42:32.200 --> 42:41.680]  Now, how much you get, that would go to a showing of how much harm was caused.
[42:41.680 --> 42:55.440]  Now, one of the fellows that I've been talking to on the internet, what he has done or been
[42:55.440 --> 43:08.640]  trying to do, hang on, let me go here, because all crimes are civil.
[43:08.640 --> 43:11.440]  All cases are civil.
[43:11.440 --> 43:16.160]  Let me interject something there before we pass it.
[43:16.160 --> 43:19.160]  Criminal is a subset of civil.
[43:19.160 --> 43:20.160]  Correct.
[43:20.160 --> 43:28.800]  So, that's why all cases are civil, because the code of criminal procedure is really a
[43:28.800 --> 43:33.920]  part of the rules of civil procedure, it's just a specific subset.
[43:33.920 --> 43:39.880]  Hang on, about to go to break, Randy Kalten, Vet Pack, Rudovil Radio, I call in number
[43:39.880 --> 43:40.880]  512-646-1984.
[43:40.880 --> 43:47.120]  And while we're on the break, you might check out our sponsors.
[43:47.120 --> 43:53.880]  We can use all the solicitation we can get on our sponsors because they help support
[43:53.880 --> 43:54.880]  this network.
[43:54.880 --> 43:57.880]  We'll be right back.
[43:57.880 --> 44:07.880]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come buy
[44:07.880 --> 44:13.320]  our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, on Brave New Books
[44:13.320 --> 44:14.320]  and Chase Bank.
[44:14.320 --> 44:18.200]  See all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.200 --> 44:22.560]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.560 --> 44:26.600]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian E-Me oil,
[44:26.600 --> 44:30.320]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.320 --> 44:43.160]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com, that's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.160 --> 45:01.200]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.200 --> 45:04.400]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.400 --> 45:09.600]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand
[45:09.600 --> 45:14.880]  for CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:14.880 --> 45:18.920]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.920 --> 45:23.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.120 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.760]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.760 --> 45:39.400]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[45:39.400 --> 45:43.560]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.560 --> 45:49.760]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.760 --> 45:52.560]  pro se tactics and much more.
[45:52.560 --> 46:20.560]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:20.560 --> 46:34.160]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, VetPak, back with Rule Law Radio and we're talking to Joseph
[46:34.160 --> 46:35.160]  in New York.
[46:35.160 --> 46:42.920]  And Joseph, as a bit of explanation, I know sometimes I sound somewhat pedantic and it's
[46:42.920 --> 46:47.400]  obvious that this is not your first rodeo.
[46:47.400 --> 46:53.840]  But when I'm doing this show, I'm always trying to anticipate the questions that my
[46:53.840 --> 47:00.320]  listeners will have who aren't as sophisticated in these issues or aren't up to speed on
[47:00.320 --> 47:02.240]  the specific issues.
[47:02.240 --> 47:07.920]  So sometimes if I seem like I'm discounting your knowledge, I don't mean to.
[47:07.920 --> 47:11.000]  I'm just trying to make sure everybody can keep up to speed with this.
[47:11.000 --> 47:13.000]  Does that make sense, Joseph?
[47:13.000 --> 47:21.200]  Oh, absolutely, I need to make a correction, though, that when it comes to actually suing,
[47:21.200 --> 47:23.240]  this is my first rodeo.
[47:23.240 --> 47:27.480]  Well, you've obviously done your homework.
[47:27.480 --> 47:37.640]  Yeah, I did some paralegal work years ago and so that's where I got some knowledge
[47:37.640 --> 47:42.640]  of the language of the law and how it works.
[47:42.640 --> 47:50.080]  But again, going after public officials, this is a new hobby.
[47:50.080 --> 48:00.360]  Let me give you some tools that you will find very useful and they're not directly obvious.
[48:00.360 --> 48:06.240]  Never give legal advice, that's harder to do than you would think.
[48:06.240 --> 48:13.360]  I was in court last week and I had prepared some papers for a friend of mine and the judge
[48:13.360 --> 48:14.920]  knew me real well.
[48:14.920 --> 48:19.400]  He looked at the papers and he knew exactly who did it, he asked him, did you write these?
[48:19.400 --> 48:29.640]  Well, I had some help and the judge looked over at me and he said, Mr. Kelton, you have
[48:29.640 --> 48:34.320]  to be careful, you're walking a very fine line.
[48:34.320 --> 48:38.760]  And what I wanted to say to the judge was, no, I'm not.
[48:38.760 --> 48:45.520]  I am a paralegal and I can do this if I want to, you're walking a fine line between witness
[48:45.520 --> 48:48.560]  tampering and obstruction of justice.
[48:48.560 --> 48:58.240]  But I bit my tongue, kept my mouth shut because it is my rule, never give legal advice.
[48:58.240 --> 49:05.000]  You give legal advice, they will always treat you, treat it as if you are threatening them.
[49:05.000 --> 49:12.120]  So Bushwhack is better, I'm not going to give you any clues to how I'm coming at you.
[49:12.120 --> 49:20.480]  Which leads to the next rule, never ask a public official to do anything you actually
[49:20.480 --> 49:23.880]  want him to do.
[49:23.880 --> 49:27.760]  Because you never ask him to do anything that the law does not require him to do and when
[49:27.760 --> 49:31.720]  he doesn't, you get to whack him good.
[49:31.720 --> 49:35.680]  This does more than give you claims against them.
[49:35.680 --> 49:42.000]  It protects you from feeling betrayed and mistreated by the courts.
[49:42.000 --> 49:46.860]  That is one of their primary tools.
[49:46.860 --> 49:52.840]  They know we come to the court with an expectation that the courts will protect us.
[49:52.840 --> 49:58.640]  They are our security and we find out they are no such thing and we tend to get frustrated,
[49:58.640 --> 50:06.440]  angry, we feel betrayed and then we don't react and respond as well as we could.
[50:06.440 --> 50:12.320]  And if we're not careful, it becomes about the fight.
[50:12.320 --> 50:20.200]  They hurt us, we want to hurt them back and we forget and take our eyes off the prize.
[50:20.200 --> 50:25.880]  If you never ask them to do anything you actually want them to do, make sure you always have
[50:25.880 --> 50:32.080]  the next thing you're going to do and never give them legal advice.
[50:32.080 --> 50:39.360]  That will set you apart from most everybody that comes in front of them.
[50:39.360 --> 50:45.800]  You are the master of the servants and when you start setting them up and they realize
[50:45.800 --> 50:48.960]  you're setting them up, they'll begin to treat you as the master.
[50:48.960 --> 50:55.320]  They're more likely to get a pleading and that's all I'm going to say on that subject.
[50:55.320 --> 50:58.520]  Every submission I make is a trap.
[50:58.520 --> 51:02.600]  I'm not trying to get justice.
[51:02.600 --> 51:06.080]  I'm hunting them big.
[51:06.080 --> 51:12.760]  I've got three judges so far to accuse themselves on my personal case and I'm going after them
[51:12.760 --> 51:19.360]  for honest services fraud for accusing themselves.
[51:19.360 --> 51:33.320]  Okay, you're going after them for failure to provide you with, what's the term for,
[51:33.320 --> 51:37.040]  the specific services claim.
[51:37.040 --> 51:46.240]  You have a right to expect, I hate when I lose terms, you expect a certain kind of service
[51:46.240 --> 51:54.080]  from your public officials and there's a term for that and it's in my head, it just won't
[51:54.080 --> 52:01.520]  come off my tongue so that's a great thing to go after them for.
[52:01.520 --> 52:06.960]  The primary thing is the guys in Georgia, the problem that they're having is they're
[52:06.960 --> 52:09.160]  not on the attack.
[52:09.160 --> 52:20.520]  They're going down and they're petitioning and they're airing their grievances but they're
[52:20.520 --> 52:24.880]  not going after them so what happened was is the prosecutor came after them first and
[52:24.880 --> 52:29.640]  got them removed from the property and got a restraining order against them for coming
[52:29.640 --> 52:35.000]  on the property and I was so frustrated when I heard that.
[52:35.000 --> 52:40.000]  Had he went straight for the prosecutor's throat, first crack out of the hat and first
[52:40.000 --> 52:45.760]  shot he gets at the judge, goes straight for the judge with legal pleadings then they can't
[52:45.760 --> 52:53.240]  come back and do anything to you because now it becomes retaliation.
[52:53.240 --> 53:04.800]  I'm accusing them of CPL 195 official misconduct knowingly refraining from performing a duty
[53:04.800 --> 53:07.240]  which is opposed upon them by law.
[53:07.240 --> 53:09.960]  Yeah, 18 U.S. Code 242.
[53:09.960 --> 53:13.240]  That as well, yes.
[53:13.240 --> 53:20.600]  I'm going after them for both the violations of state and federal law.
[53:20.600 --> 53:28.400]  Somewhere I saw a case where, and I was going to ask you to confirm if it's true or not,
[53:28.400 --> 53:33.400]  that your state constitutional rights are deemed to be separate and apart from your
[53:33.400 --> 53:38.520]  federal so even though they protect the same right, they're deemed to be different in
[53:38.520 --> 53:39.520]  law.
[53:39.520 --> 53:44.560]  You can sue for violations of both at the same time, is that correct?
[53:44.560 --> 53:52.600]  Screws v. U.S., 93 U.S.C. 365 I believe, but if you do a search for Screws v. U.S. you'll
[53:52.600 --> 53:54.400]  find this case.
[53:54.400 --> 54:01.000]  A sheriff and two deputies, they're in a bar in Mississippi 1945.
[54:01.000 --> 54:03.720]  They're upset at this black guy, they're going to go arrest him.
[54:03.720 --> 54:07.240]  The bartender tries to talk him out of it, they won't be dissuaded.
[54:07.240 --> 54:11.800]  They go arrest the guy and wind up beating him to death on the courthouse steps.
[54:11.800 --> 54:18.480]  They're prosecuted in the state, they're sued in the state, and then they're sued again
[54:18.480 --> 54:19.760]  in the Fed.
[54:19.760 --> 54:24.600]  And they complain to the court that they didn't have adequate notice that they could be sued
[54:24.600 --> 54:27.560]  both in the state and in the Fed.
[54:27.560 --> 54:36.520]  And at 109, the court opined.
[54:36.520 --> 54:41.040]  A private citizen cannot claim ignorance of the law as a defense to prosecution.
[54:41.040 --> 54:47.160]  A public official is held to a much higher standard, and I'm paraphrasing somewhat here.
[54:47.160 --> 54:55.360]  They say, and this is not a paraphrase, if a public official violates a ruling of this
[54:55.360 --> 55:04.160]  court and he be seen, he may not be heard to say he knows not what he does.
[55:04.160 --> 55:08.640]  And the whole point of that is yes, you can be sued in the state and you can be sued in
[55:08.640 --> 55:09.640]  the Fed.
[55:09.640 --> 55:12.440]  You can definitely do that.
[55:12.440 --> 55:19.520]  Because in the Fed, the 42 U.S. Code 1983 is procedural due process, and the Constitution
[55:19.520 --> 55:22.360]  guarantees you procedural due process.
[55:22.360 --> 55:27.620]  If your state guarantees you procedural due process, you have two guarantees and you can
[55:27.620 --> 55:29.360]  exercise them both.
[55:29.360 --> 55:30.360]  Okay.
[55:30.360 --> 55:39.040]  Now, I pulled up a case recently where the plaintiff invoked under his, in his 1983 supplemental
[55:39.040 --> 55:44.920]  jurisdiction of the federal court to hear and decide the plaintiff's claims under state
[55:44.920 --> 55:53.160]  law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367A, but I haven't checked that out yet to see if, you know.
[55:53.160 --> 55:54.160]  1367A.
[55:54.160 --> 56:07.440]  1367 was changed recently in the 2011 Venue and Removal Clarification Act.
[56:07.440 --> 56:15.400]  What we had was some of the circuits said that if a case that has state issues and federal
[56:15.400 --> 56:23.680]  issues is removed to the federal court, the federal court cannot hear the state issues
[56:23.680 --> 56:27.480]  because it's an unreasonable preemption of state law.
[56:27.480 --> 56:36.760]  Then other circuits said that in that case, the Fed should hear both under the doctrine
[56:36.760 --> 56:38.840]  of judicial economy.
[56:38.840 --> 56:47.320]  Well, the legislature stepped in and clarified the split between the circuits.
[56:47.320 --> 56:55.760]  That is what the Supreme primarily does, is it primarily takes cases where there's a split
[56:55.760 --> 57:00.120]  between the circuits and it settles the issue.
[57:00.120 --> 57:07.320]  They settled it by saying while a case with state and federal issues can be removed to
[57:07.320 --> 57:14.240]  the federal court, the federal court must sever and remand the state issues.
[57:14.240 --> 57:21.160]  Look up 2011 Venue and Removal Clarification Act.
[57:21.160 --> 57:28.920]  I'm sorry, it's 2012, it was passed in 2011, but took effect in 2012.
[57:28.920 --> 57:35.840]  So the 2012 Venue and Removal Clarification Act, I have filed briefs on that a number
[57:35.840 --> 57:42.040]  of times and clearly the courts had no idea what the law says.
[57:42.040 --> 57:47.840]  It changed in 2012, changed 200 years of law.
[57:47.840 --> 57:53.560]  If you look on the federal website, it doesn't have the change in it.
[57:53.560 --> 57:55.800]  You have to look up the act.
[57:55.800 --> 58:01.720]  Well, that's strange, I mean, well, okay, so as a matter of wide, I don't want to try
[58:01.720 --> 58:04.240]  to use that, does it?
[58:04.240 --> 58:05.240]  Probably not.
[58:05.240 --> 58:07.200]  I mean, I might be able to...
[58:07.200 --> 58:12.720]  You can try, if the other side doesn't know about the removal act, then they won't raise
[58:12.720 --> 58:13.720]  the issue.
[58:13.720 --> 58:17.360]  And if they don't raise the issue, the judge will hear it.
[58:17.360 --> 58:23.760]  I filed criminal charges against Judge McBride because he ruled on state issues when I claimed
[58:23.760 --> 58:27.000]  he didn't have such a matter of jurisdiction.
[58:27.000 --> 58:31.200]  I guess there's no harm in leaving it in there, because they always do.
[58:31.200 --> 58:33.760]  Like chicken soup, it couldn't hoit.
[58:33.760 --> 58:39.360]  Okay, hang on, about to go to break, Randy Kelton, VetPak, Rule of Law Radio, our call
[58:39.360 --> 58:50.320]  in number 512-646-1984, we'll be right back.
[58:50.320 --> 58:54.480]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.480 --> 58:59.640]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.640 --> 59:00.980]  can really help.
[59:00.980 --> 59:05.440]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.440 --> 59:06.440]  today.
[59:06.440 --> 59:10.340]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.340 --> 59:13.440]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.440 --> 59:18.700]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.700 --> 59:24.400]  Here by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.400 --> 59:27.900]  growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church.
[59:27.900 --> 59:32.920]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:32.920 --> 59:45.680]  Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit
[59:45.680 --> 59:48.960]  us online at bfa.org.
[59:48.960 --> 01:00:00.680]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.680 --> 01:00:05.880]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[01:00:05.880 --> 01:00:13.480]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[01:00:13.480 --> 01:00:17.840]  into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:17.840 --> 01:00:24.440]  Markets for Wednesday, the 27th of July, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,327.05
[01:00:24.440 --> 01:00:31.920]  an ounce, silver, $19.95 an ounce, Texas crude, $42.92 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[01:00:31.920 --> 01:00:40.880]  sitting at about 658 U.S. currency.
[01:00:40.880 --> 01:00:46.280]  Today in history, the year 1929, the Geneva Convention dealing with the treatment of prisoners
[01:00:46.280 --> 01:00:48.840]  of war is signed by 53 nations.
[01:00:48.840 --> 01:00:52.640]  Its provisions dealt mostly with the capture and captivity of prisoners of war and the
[01:00:52.640 --> 01:00:55.560]  classification and treatment of civilians during war.
[01:00:55.560 --> 01:01:03.480]  The 1929 Geneva Convention agreement was signed today in history.
[01:01:03.480 --> 01:01:09.120]  In recent news, Julian Assange, via his anonymous whistleblower site, Wikileaks, released 20,000
[01:01:09.120 --> 01:01:13.280]  direct emails from the Democratic National Convention on Friday, July 22, days before
[01:01:13.280 --> 01:01:17.040]  the commencement of the convention, on Monday, allowing it to be disseminated and read over
[01:01:17.040 --> 01:01:18.040]  the weekend.
[01:01:18.040 --> 01:01:21.320]  The emails were so embarrassingly damning that they resulted in Debbie Schultz, the
[01:01:21.320 --> 01:01:25.880]  chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, resigning on Sunday, a day before the opening
[01:01:25.880 --> 01:01:26.880]  ceremonies.
[01:01:26.880 --> 01:01:30.340]  Amongst the litany of embarrassing emails leaked by Wikileaks, there were emails from
[01:01:30.340 --> 01:01:36.240]  January 2015 to May 2016, where DNC staff essentially preselected Hillary for the nomination
[01:01:36.240 --> 01:01:38.740]  discussing how to deal with Bernie Sanders.
[01:01:38.740 --> 01:01:42.700]  In order to ensure Clinton's nomination, long before any votes had been cast.
[01:01:42.700 --> 01:01:46.640]  The bulk of released emails come from seven prominent DNC staff members, senior advisor
[01:01:46.640 --> 01:01:52.320]  Andrew Wright, national finance director Jordan Kaplan, finance chief of staff Scott Comer,
[01:01:52.320 --> 01:01:56.440]  Northern California finance director Robert Stowe, finance director of data and strategic
[01:01:56.440 --> 01:02:01.400]  initiatives Daniel Parrish, finance director Alan Zachary, and Miranda.
[01:02:01.400 --> 01:02:05.120]  Amongst the emails was one dated May 5, where the chief financial officer of the Democratic
[01:02:05.120 --> 01:02:09.640]  National Committee, Brad Marshall, suggested attacking Sanders over his Jewish heritage,
[01:02:09.640 --> 01:02:12.120]  contrasted to his atheistic tendencies.
[01:02:12.120 --> 01:02:16.560]  This Wikileak release comes weeks after hacker Guccifer 2.0 had released several internal
[01:02:16.560 --> 01:02:21.620]  memos showing that the DNC staff were strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee as
[01:02:21.620 --> 01:02:23.520]  early as March 2015.
[01:02:23.520 --> 01:02:28.160]  This release was followed by a class action lawsuit against Debbie Schultz and the DNC
[01:02:28.160 --> 01:02:31.060]  in June by Florida based law firm Beck and Lee.
[01:02:31.060 --> 01:02:35.960]  If this wasn't enough, an email dated May 6 from the DNC digital office and Obama campaign
[01:02:35.960 --> 01:02:40.760]  veteran Rebecca Christopher read, quote, attached to the script for a new video we'd like to
[01:02:40.760 --> 01:02:45.600]  use to mop up some of the more Taco Bull engagement and demonstrate that Trump actually isn't
[01:02:45.600 --> 01:02:46.600]  trying.
[01:02:46.600 --> 01:02:50.720]  It is yet unclear whether she was referring to Donald Trump's Cinco de Mayo tweet or to
[01:02:50.720 --> 01:02:55.200]  the Hispanic voting constituents as the Taco Bell engagement.
[01:02:55.200 --> 01:03:02.200]  This was Rook Rody with your lowdown for July 27, 2016.
[01:03:25.200 --> 01:03:33.200]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, VETPAC, the news of our radio and we're talking to Joseph
[01:03:33.200 --> 01:03:34.200]  in New York.
[01:03:34.200 --> 01:03:37.200]  Okay, Joseph, where are we?
[01:03:37.200 --> 01:03:49.560]  Well, I guess it would come up to perhaps another question or two having to do with
[01:03:49.560 --> 01:03:55.480]  my federal suit here.
[01:03:55.480 --> 01:04:07.560]  One is my presumption is that these judges or justices are not presiding in the capacity
[01:04:07.560 --> 01:04:14.720]  of a judge or justice when they're presiding over vehicle traffic law.
[01:04:14.720 --> 01:04:19.800]  You know, they're presiding as executive administrators.
[01:04:19.800 --> 01:04:27.440]  So in my claim, I'm not mentioning the court justice.
[01:04:27.440 --> 01:04:31.600]  How do you get to that position?
[01:04:31.600 --> 01:04:50.560]  That they're deemed to be clerks for the complaining agency when they're hearing, you know, basically
[01:04:50.560 --> 01:04:59.720]  violations of basically your contract, you know, with the motor vehicle department.
[01:04:59.720 --> 01:05:08.720]  Okay, so this would apply to the enforcement of a municipal ordinance?
[01:05:08.720 --> 01:05:09.720]  Yes.
[01:05:09.720 --> 01:05:19.040]  Well, no, it would be, it's not a municipal ordinance because the Department of Motor
[01:05:19.040 --> 01:05:24.800]  Vehicles is not a municipal corporation, it's private.
[01:05:24.800 --> 01:05:32.720]  Well, I don't see how you can get there if the transportation code has been adopted by
[01:05:32.720 --> 01:05:41.400]  the state, then the judge is enforcing state law and that he can do in his capacity as
[01:05:41.400 --> 01:05:42.880]  a judge.
[01:05:42.880 --> 01:05:51.880]  Now, if he were enforcing a municipal ordinance, that might change things because the legislature
[01:05:51.880 --> 01:05:57.380]  is authorized by your constitution to write law.
[01:05:57.380 --> 01:06:03.740]  No state has an authorization for the legislature to delegate that power.
[01:06:03.740 --> 01:06:09.320]  So they can't delegate writing law to your municipal corporation.
[01:06:09.320 --> 01:06:18.040]  So that's why they call their laws ordinances instead of statutes because now you can challenge
[01:06:18.040 --> 01:06:22.880]  that you're not within the statutory scheme of the corporation.
[01:06:22.880 --> 01:06:31.720]  But if they, if the traffic code has been adopted into state law and a violation is
[01:06:31.720 --> 01:06:40.680]  designated a crime rather than administrative violation, I don't see how you can get there.
[01:06:40.680 --> 01:06:44.600]  Because from what I understand, it was adapted by resolution.
[01:06:44.600 --> 01:06:52.360]  It wasn't adopted in the way that, you know, state law is normally, you know, adopted.
[01:06:52.360 --> 01:07:02.640]  It's actually private law that, I'm going to have to bring it up now so I can be a little
[01:07:02.640 --> 01:07:03.640]  clearer on it.
[01:07:03.640 --> 01:07:15.440]  It is private law that the federal government actually pays to use, the United States as
[01:07:15.440 --> 01:07:29.720]  well as 63 other countries, it's owned by Unidroid, it's out of Italy, and, you know,
[01:07:29.720 --> 01:07:40.800]  it's adopted by resolution, therefore it isn't state law in the sense that it's law that's
[01:07:40.800 --> 01:07:48.600]  adopted by the political entity.
[01:07:48.600 --> 01:07:54.400]  So you're saying that it wasn't passed into law.
[01:07:54.400 --> 01:07:55.880]  Correct.
[01:07:55.880 --> 01:08:00.000]  So what does adopted by resolution mean?
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:10.040]  Well, adopted by resolution is where, that only happens when they're, you know, adopting
[01:08:10.040 --> 01:08:20.920]  something under their corporate powers, alright, and it exclusively applies to their corporate
[01:08:20.920 --> 01:08:21.920]  authority.
[01:08:21.920 --> 01:08:22.920]  Okay.
[01:08:22.920 --> 01:08:33.880]  So it doesn't have anything to do with their sovereign powers, okay, and in that case when
[01:08:33.880 --> 01:08:40.720]  they want to adopt private law that applies to, you know, their internal, their corporate
[01:08:40.720 --> 01:08:46.200]  functions, alright, then they adopt it by resolution.
[01:08:46.200 --> 01:08:49.080]  The law does not apply generally to the people.
[01:08:49.080 --> 01:08:50.080]  Okay.
[01:08:50.080 --> 01:08:51.080]  So.
[01:08:51.080 --> 01:08:52.080]  It applies.
[01:08:52.080 --> 01:08:53.080]  Okay.
[01:08:53.080 --> 01:09:01.680]  So you have the procedural history of the adoption of the resolution that shows clearly
[01:09:01.680 --> 01:09:10.200]  that this was not passed into law, but rather adopted as a resolution, or by resolution.
[01:09:10.200 --> 01:09:12.360]  Correct, yeah.
[01:09:12.360 --> 01:09:15.520]  That sounds like an interesting argument.
[01:09:15.520 --> 01:09:20.120]  You know, I get a lot of these patriot mythology arguments.
[01:09:20.120 --> 01:09:29.240]  I had a guy recently who's saying none of the laws apply because the courts are a corporation,
[01:09:29.240 --> 01:09:34.320]  and he already spent seven years in prison arguing these issues, and now they're trying
[01:09:34.320 --> 01:09:39.400]  to prosecute him again, and I was really frustrated because I was concerned he was going to go
[01:09:39.400 --> 01:09:49.680]  back to prison arguing this patriot mythology, and so here this sounds like it, but it also
[01:09:49.680 --> 01:09:56.880]  sounds like some of the arguments that Eddie Craig has dug out of the code, and we had
[01:09:56.880 --> 01:10:08.800]  one guy prove that the federal penal laws, Title 18, was never passed into law.
[01:10:08.800 --> 01:10:11.120]  He proved it.
[01:10:11.120 --> 01:10:18.200]  So this could be interesting.
[01:10:18.200 --> 01:10:24.960]  But these patronuts aren't, you know, they're not doing their research, and the thing is
[01:10:24.960 --> 01:10:29.600]  there is both corporate law and there is sovereign law.
[01:10:29.600 --> 01:10:34.800]  They exist simultaneously, and they just don't get that, and you have to understand, you
[01:10:34.800 --> 01:10:44.280]  know, when, you know, you're faced with, you know, an accusation, you know, what kind
[01:10:44.280 --> 01:10:50.640]  of law are you being accused of violating, or, you know, have you violated some kind
[01:10:50.640 --> 01:10:57.120]  of a contractual obligation, or have you violated a general law that applies to everybody, you
[01:10:57.120 --> 01:11:04.440]  know, and if you don't understand who or what is accusing you, you know, just going
[01:11:04.440 --> 01:11:08.640]  up and saying, well, of course you're commercial, of course you're going to jail.
[01:11:08.640 --> 01:11:11.920]  Now you sound like Harmon Taylor.
[01:11:11.920 --> 01:11:14.200]  I sound like who?
[01:11:14.200 --> 01:11:17.160]  Harmon Taylor.
[01:11:17.160 --> 01:11:19.760]  Harmon Taylor always gives me a headache.
[01:11:19.760 --> 01:11:21.580]  He is so deep.
[01:11:21.580 --> 01:11:26.200]  After I've talked to him, it takes me two or three days to catch up to all of it.
[01:11:26.200 --> 01:11:36.280]  But he argues that the only actual law is the penal code.
[01:11:36.280 --> 01:11:38.280]  Everything else is by contract.
[01:11:38.280 --> 01:11:39.280]  Everything.
[01:11:39.280 --> 01:11:44.360]  I would disagree with him, I'd love to talk to him, because I would...
[01:11:44.360 --> 01:11:46.880]  I'm telling you, he'll give you a headache.
[01:11:46.880 --> 01:11:54.480]  He used to be a lawyer, and got so disgusted with the profession, he gave up his bar card.
[01:11:54.480 --> 01:12:00.160]  But he is the deepest thinker I've ever come across.
[01:12:00.160 --> 01:12:07.920]  So that's what he argues, is everything is by contract, and the most difficult thing
[01:12:07.920 --> 01:12:14.240]  is to understand how we opt into the contract.
[01:12:14.240 --> 01:12:19.080]  I was just speaking to a guy today about the little town I live in.
[01:12:19.080 --> 01:12:24.000]  I'm working on my house, and I'm right next to City Hall, and I tore down the whole back
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:28.880]  of the house and rebuilt it, and nobody ever showed up from City Hall.
[01:12:28.880 --> 01:12:34.600]  And they're not going to, either, because they don't want to get in a fight with me.
[01:12:34.600 --> 01:12:44.920]  But if they did, the first question I was going to ask is, how did I opt into your regulatory
[01:12:44.920 --> 01:12:45.920]  scheme?
[01:12:45.920 --> 01:12:51.940]  How did I engage myself in a contract with the municipality so that I fall within your
[01:12:51.940 --> 01:12:53.880]  regulatory scheme?
[01:12:53.880 --> 01:13:01.680]  Now, I know how I did it, but they don't know.
[01:13:01.680 --> 01:13:02.680]  That'll work.
[01:13:02.680 --> 01:13:08.720]  So I'm not going to tell them.
[01:13:08.720 --> 01:13:11.880]  But it's hard not to opt into it.
[01:13:11.880 --> 01:13:19.360]  If you accept any benefits, you opt into the contract.
[01:13:19.360 --> 01:13:24.040]  Harmon spends a lot of time talking about how to get outside the contract.
[01:13:24.040 --> 01:13:25.280]  Yes.
[01:13:25.280 --> 01:13:34.200]  In my view, all penal law is civil and moves by contract.
[01:13:34.200 --> 01:13:41.880]  Only the general law or the common law in Admiralty and maritime law are truly criminal.
[01:13:41.880 --> 01:13:42.880]  Wait.
[01:13:42.880 --> 01:13:45.240]  There is no more maritime law.
[01:13:45.240 --> 01:13:52.640]  The maritime in 1965 was combined with the civil procedure.
[01:13:52.640 --> 01:13:57.040]  They're all one piece now, so there is no separate maritime.
[01:13:57.040 --> 01:14:01.020]  And there is no separate jurisdiction.
[01:14:01.020 --> 01:14:09.080]  The penal code, the only way that the thing about the penal code is, it's essentially
[01:14:09.080 --> 01:14:12.120]  the remnants of the common law.
[01:14:12.120 --> 01:14:21.320]  And when you step into the physical boundaries of a jurisdiction, you opt into the common
[01:14:21.320 --> 01:14:23.480]  law penal code.
[01:14:23.480 --> 01:14:26.120]  But that's all.
[01:14:26.120 --> 01:14:30.220]  This guy, he's saying none of the laws apply to him, so I said, it's okay.
[01:14:30.220 --> 01:14:35.260]  So if I decide I don't like you, I just walk up and shoot you.
[01:14:35.260 --> 01:14:40.520]  And since I don't agree with the statute, it doesn't apply to me.
[01:14:40.520 --> 01:14:47.400]  How does that work?
[01:14:47.400 --> 01:14:55.520]  There's certain laws that we opt into by being in the jurisdiction, but those are very limited.
[01:14:55.520 --> 01:14:59.400]  And you're going from my perspective to the right place.
[01:14:59.400 --> 01:15:02.320]  A lot of people want to start in the middle.
[01:15:02.320 --> 01:15:03.800]  They want to start with merits.
[01:15:03.800 --> 01:15:05.360]  No, no, no, no.
[01:15:05.360 --> 01:15:09.520]  We don't get to merits for a while.
[01:15:09.520 --> 01:15:19.000]  The first thing I want to see is not the pleading itself, not the sufficiency of the pleading
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:20.080]  itself.
[01:15:20.080 --> 01:15:27.760]  I want to see the standing and legal capacity of the pleador.
[01:15:27.760 --> 01:15:29.160]  Who are you?
[01:15:29.160 --> 01:15:31.800]  What power do you have to file this thing?
[01:15:31.800 --> 01:15:32.800]  Okay.
[01:15:32.800 --> 01:15:37.480]  Once we get past that, now I want to look at the sufficiency of the pleading.
[01:15:37.480 --> 01:15:44.040]  We mentioned earlier that we sued a judge for sending out a subpoena when the guy that
[01:15:44.040 --> 01:15:52.480]  filed the debt collection suit didn't file the statement with the suit that was acquired
[01:15:52.480 --> 01:15:54.760]  by statute.
[01:15:54.760 --> 01:16:00.560]  And he said, well, it's not my place to determine the jurisdiction, the judge did.
[01:16:00.560 --> 01:16:02.200]  You have to determine that.
[01:16:02.200 --> 01:16:08.320]  And Mr. Edelman, the client said, well, with all due respect, Your Honor, before you send
[01:16:08.320 --> 01:16:11.880]  me this demand to show up in your court and tell me all the things you're going to do
[01:16:11.880 --> 01:16:19.680]  to me if I don't, you need to make sure you have authority to do that.
[01:16:19.680 --> 01:16:27.480]  So first place we go is, does the pleader have standing and capacity?
[01:16:27.480 --> 01:16:30.440]  And did he file a pleading that is sufficient under law?
[01:16:30.440 --> 01:16:36.560]  We don't get to the merits for a while and you were going right there, right to the front
[01:16:36.560 --> 01:16:37.560]  end.
[01:16:37.560 --> 01:16:44.800]  Hang on, about to go to break, Larry, Oliver, I see you there, we'll get to both of you.
[01:16:44.800 --> 01:17:01.720]  You'll be right back.
[01:17:01.720 --> 01:17:06.000]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener supported radio network
[01:17:06.000 --> 01:17:10.520]  on top of the on air talents, producers and other hardworking individuals working behind
[01:17:10.520 --> 01:17:11.520]  the scenes.
[01:17:11.520 --> 01:17:15.680]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[01:17:15.680 --> 01:17:20.280]  And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year in our annual fundraisers,
[01:17:20.280 --> 01:17:23.320]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:17:23.320 --> 01:17:27.320]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution.
[01:17:27.320 --> 01:17:32.480]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[01:17:32.480 --> 01:17:37.000]  First prize being a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver, second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:39.400]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[01:17:39.400 --> 01:17:43.800]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you'll also receive a complimentary
[01:17:43.800 --> 01:17:45.760]  jar of My Magic Mud.
[01:17:45.760 --> 01:17:50.200]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[01:17:50.200 --> 01:17:55.080]  The Logos Radio Network fundraiser, head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information
[01:17:55.080 --> 01:18:00.040]  and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:18:00.040 --> 01:18:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:04.880 --> 01:18:08.840]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:18:08.840 --> 01:18:13.160]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[01:18:13.160 --> 01:18:14.480]  can win too.
[01:18:14.480 --> 01:18:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:24.760]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:18:24.760 --> 01:18:29.400]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:18:29.400 --> 01:18:33.600]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:33.600 --> 01:18:38.400]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:38.400 --> 01:18:40.640]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:40.640 --> 01:18:46.360]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:18:46.360 --> 01:18:49.360]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.360 --> 01:18:58.320]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:18:58.320 --> 01:18:59.960]  collectors now.
[01:18:59.960 --> 01:19:08.800]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:08.800 --> 01:19:34.520]  Ain't gonna blame me, don't blame me, well, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick
[01:19:34.520 --> 01:19:35.520]  again.
[01:19:35.520 --> 01:19:44.520]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan, you put the fear in my pockets, took the money
[01:19:44.520 --> 01:19:49.600]  from my hand, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:49.600 --> 01:19:50.600]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:50.600 --> 01:19:55.680]  We're going to Kelton vet pack with our radio and I goofed up and bailed out a little early
[01:19:55.680 --> 01:19:59.440]  on that last one, I got my timing off.
[01:19:59.440 --> 01:20:05.000]  Okay, it's better than falling off the cliff but not much better.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:08.640]  Okay, where were we?
[01:20:08.640 --> 01:20:18.520]  Well, if it would be okay with you, I'd like to bring up a case that I'm relying upon.
[01:20:18.520 --> 01:20:26.160]  I'm going to do something a little bit unusual, I'm going to attempt to separate some assistant
[01:20:26.160 --> 01:20:32.400]  prosecutors from their office so that I can sue them, all right?
[01:20:32.400 --> 01:20:42.400]  And how I'm doing that has to do with the case, it's North Carolina versus Rod Klaas,
[01:20:42.400 --> 01:20:54.640]  it's an administrative hearing, it's under 10 DOT 7047 and the ruling of the judge, conclusion
[01:20:54.640 --> 01:21:07.480]  of law that I'm relying upon is that the first one I'm using, the Dallas Police Department
[01:21:07.480 --> 01:21:14.320]  and the local unit of government is not an agency under Chapter 150B, moreover the respondent
[01:21:14.320 --> 01:21:22.200]  license plate agency is also not an agency under 150B because it's a private entity
[01:21:22.200 --> 01:21:26.320]  and does not fall within the executive branch of state government.
[01:21:26.320 --> 01:21:32.560]  That's because it's Dallas Police and it's a municipal corporation, is that the reason?
[01:21:32.560 --> 01:21:33.560]  Yes.
[01:21:33.560 --> 01:21:34.560]  Okay.
[01:21:34.560 --> 01:21:38.920]  But I'm not, that's not, the one I'm after is the license plate agency, they're their
[01:21:38.920 --> 01:21:43.920]  Department of Transportation, it's deemed to be a private entity, therefore, when the
[01:21:43.920 --> 01:21:51.520]  prosecutor prosecutes for your violation of a contract against them, he's acting as a
[01:21:51.520 --> 01:21:55.120]  private attorney, all right?
[01:21:55.120 --> 01:22:11.560]  So he's misusing the office of prosecutor, all right, to go after me when this is a private
[01:22:11.560 --> 01:22:15.360]  action, all right?
[01:22:15.360 --> 01:22:18.560]  Can you email me a link to that case?
[01:22:18.560 --> 01:22:21.880]  Oh, sure, yeah, yeah.
[01:22:21.880 --> 01:22:24.480]  I'd very much like to look at that.
[01:22:24.480 --> 01:22:30.400]  There's a bunch more cases of judicial decisions that came after that because he took it right
[01:22:30.400 --> 01:22:39.280]  up to the state Supreme Court and this ruling was upheld because what he did is he initially
[01:22:39.280 --> 01:22:44.840]  sued them for violation of their oath of office and they came back and said, oath of office
[01:22:44.840 --> 01:22:48.160]  doesn't apply because we were acting in a private capacity.
[01:22:48.160 --> 01:22:52.600]  So then he appealed, he lost his appeal, but that's what he wanted.
[01:22:52.600 --> 01:22:53.600]  Okay.
[01:22:53.600 --> 01:22:54.600]  Hold on.
[01:22:54.600 --> 01:22:55.600]  He attacked them.
[01:22:55.600 --> 01:22:56.600]  Okay.
[01:22:56.600 --> 01:23:02.960]  The fact that it ruled the way it did, did it go to collateral estoppel?
[01:23:02.960 --> 01:23:03.960]  Yes.
[01:23:03.960 --> 01:23:09.280]  That's exactly what he did when he finally turned around and sued them, he used estoppel
[01:23:09.280 --> 01:23:12.440]  because then they turned around and said, oh, hey, wait a minute, we're a government
[01:23:12.440 --> 01:23:15.720]  agency and he said, uh-uh, estoppel, sorry.
[01:23:15.720 --> 01:23:21.920]  Okay, here's, here's going to be the weakness in the case from what I've seen so far.
[01:23:21.920 --> 01:23:29.240]  This may not, the ruling may not mean that they are a private organization.
[01:23:29.240 --> 01:23:37.640]  What it may be saying is you made that claim and under collateral estoppel, you can't get
[01:23:37.640 --> 01:23:43.000]  out from under, you can't come to the court and take a position and then subsequently
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:48.600]  come to the court and take a diametrically opposed position, your collateral estopped.
[01:23:48.600 --> 01:23:54.800]  So I'd want to look at the case real careful to make sure that the ruling wasn't based
[01:23:54.800 --> 01:24:02.040]  on what they said and were bound to what they said rather than what was actually the case.
[01:24:02.040 --> 01:24:04.040]  Does that make sense, Joseph?
[01:24:04.040 --> 01:24:05.640]  Oh, absolutely.
[01:24:05.640 --> 01:24:16.080]  But he based his attack on a previous case that I haven't downloaded yet out of Virginia
[01:24:16.080 --> 01:24:23.040]  where again, three state officials were sued for violation of oath of office.
[01:24:23.040 --> 01:24:28.960]  And the case was thrown out because they just declared that they were acting in a private
[01:24:28.960 --> 01:24:32.120]  capacity and the court upheld it.
[01:24:32.120 --> 01:24:33.120]  Okay.
[01:24:33.120 --> 01:24:38.840]  So you haven't seen the case, so you don't know what the nature of the action was.
[01:24:38.840 --> 01:24:40.680]  No, I got to download it.
[01:24:40.680 --> 01:24:41.680]  I got to pay for it.
[01:24:41.680 --> 01:24:45.960]  You know, I mean, it doesn't cost much because they haven't gotten around to doing that yet,
[01:24:45.960 --> 01:24:51.280]  but there's been quite a few proceedings.
[01:24:51.280 --> 01:24:53.040]  Send me a link to that one as well.
[01:24:53.040 --> 01:24:57.640]  I'll download them off Pacer and send them back to you.
[01:24:57.640 --> 01:24:59.120]  All right.
[01:24:59.120 --> 01:25:01.720]  Yeah, I was just going to pay.
[01:25:01.720 --> 01:25:06.400]  It's just like eight bucks or something like that, and then you can do this one site and
[01:25:06.400 --> 01:25:08.280]  then you can download all the cases.
[01:25:08.280 --> 01:25:10.440]  It's like eight bucks a month or something like that.
[01:25:10.440 --> 01:25:11.440]  It's really cheap.
[01:25:11.440 --> 01:25:14.160]  Oh, you must have something different.
[01:25:14.160 --> 01:25:17.840]  I use Pacer and Pacer charges you so much a page or something.
[01:25:17.840 --> 01:25:20.160]  It's like a diamond page.
[01:25:20.160 --> 01:25:21.160]  So it's not a big deal.
[01:25:21.160 --> 01:25:28.480]  There's a bunch of stuff that this Mr. Klass has, you know, as he goes through various
[01:25:28.480 --> 01:25:39.720]  court proceedings, he uploads, you know, both his briefs and the court's findings on this
[01:25:39.720 --> 01:25:40.720]  one website there.
[01:25:40.720 --> 01:25:50.200]  And then, you know, you can, you know, I'm cautious with Rod Klass.
[01:25:50.200 --> 01:25:57.440]  The pleadings that I've read, when I went back and researched out his case law, I wasn't
[01:25:57.440 --> 01:26:00.200]  happy with what I found.
[01:26:00.200 --> 01:26:11.840]  Now, in Rod Klass' benefit, it may have just been coincidental that I found these cases
[01:26:11.840 --> 01:26:18.520]  that didn't fit, but I would be real careful and read these cases carefully because a lot
[01:26:18.520 --> 01:26:26.720]  of times we read cases for what we want to find rather than what is actually there.
[01:26:26.720 --> 01:26:28.560]  And that would be very careful.
[01:26:28.560 --> 01:26:34.360]  Well, I was only interested in what, you know, the judge's role.
[01:26:34.360 --> 01:26:40.800]  You know, when I first read, when I initially saw some of Rod Klass' work, I dismissed
[01:26:40.800 --> 01:26:48.080]  it, you know, and I didn't follow anything, you know, that he had written for quite some
[01:26:48.080 --> 01:26:59.880]  time until I came across this decision, you know, by the North Carolina, you know, county
[01:26:59.880 --> 01:27:00.880]  court there.
[01:27:00.880 --> 01:27:06.040]  And then I said, oh, hey, wait a minute, that's, you know, that's a very interesting finding.
[01:27:06.040 --> 01:27:13.480]  And your reference to the court's decisions, just last night I was talking about that,
[01:27:13.480 --> 01:27:20.560]  that you take the court's ruling and this is what Harman Taylor says, he says, if you'll
[01:27:20.560 --> 01:27:26.920]  pay attention, when the judge issues a ruling, he's trying to teach you, so you should pay
[01:27:26.920 --> 01:27:28.400]  close attention to it.
[01:27:28.400 --> 01:27:37.680]  I love taking those court orders apart because generally if it's a lower court order, they're
[01:27:37.680 --> 01:27:42.760]  a mess, they're trash, the judge screws up everything.
[01:27:42.760 --> 01:27:48.320]  But when you get to the appeals court decisions, they are wonderful pieces.
[01:27:48.320 --> 01:27:50.080]  They tell you everything you need to know.
[01:27:50.080 --> 01:27:56.080]  They tell you, this is why you're losing this issue, this is how you should have argued
[01:27:56.080 --> 01:27:57.120]  the issue.
[01:27:57.120 --> 01:28:00.920]  If you pay attention to it, they tell you how to set it up so you can win next time.
[01:28:00.920 --> 01:28:03.320]  I really enjoy those.
[01:28:03.320 --> 01:28:05.960]  Yes, exactly.
[01:28:05.960 --> 01:28:10.320]  So, yeah, I'm working on that.
[01:28:10.320 --> 01:28:18.640]  Everything that I just started to, I just thought about today, the trooper that wrote
[01:28:18.640 --> 01:28:24.960]  me the tickets, now I've been to court on my traffic citations, I've been to three
[01:28:24.960 --> 01:28:33.760]  different courts and all three courts ruled that those traffic citations confer jurisdiction
[01:28:33.760 --> 01:28:34.760]  upon the court.
[01:28:34.760 --> 01:28:47.920]  Okay, of course, I challenged each time, however, I'm thinking in my suit against the trooper,
[01:28:47.920 --> 01:28:53.400]  I'm just going to go along with the fact that they all ruled that his tickets confer jurisdiction
[01:28:53.400 --> 01:29:00.440]  upon the court and go after him for basically acting in the capacity of a prosecutor and
[01:29:00.440 --> 01:29:03.880]  a whole bunch of other things and with a stopple.
[01:29:03.880 --> 01:29:09.720]  Well, okay, there's one thing about the citation.
[01:29:09.720 --> 01:29:18.320]  How did the citation establish that you fell within the regulatory scheme?
[01:29:18.320 --> 01:29:24.800]  It didn't.
[01:29:24.800 --> 01:29:27.280]  I don't care the court ruled what it ruled.
[01:29:27.280 --> 01:29:35.080]  No, whether or not they have jurisdiction, that makes the complaint insufficient on its
[01:29:35.080 --> 01:29:39.360]  face to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[01:29:39.360 --> 01:29:42.520]  Exactly, but what the heck do I care?
[01:29:42.520 --> 01:29:47.880]  They all ruled that tickets confer jurisdiction.
[01:29:47.880 --> 01:29:51.200]  Okay, wait, wait, hang on, about to go to break.
[01:29:51.200 --> 01:29:52.560]  I just got a few seconds.
[01:29:52.560 --> 01:30:02.520]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:02.520 --> 01:30:07.320]  Take a whiff of that, onions may have a scrambling for breath mints, but they might also save
[01:30:07.320 --> 01:30:08.320]  our lives.
[01:30:08.320 --> 01:30:11.820]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with some reasons to spice
[01:30:11.820 --> 01:30:15.540]  up your food with the power of onions.
[01:30:15.540 --> 01:30:17.120]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.120 --> 01:30:20.720]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.720 --> 01:30:25.480]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.480 --> 01:30:30.640]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.640 --> 01:30:33.240]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.240 --> 01:30:37.520]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[01:30:37.520 --> 01:30:41.080]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:41.080 --> 01:30:44.080]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:44.080 --> 01:30:47.040]  An onion a day could keep the doctor away.
[01:30:47.040 --> 01:30:51.920]  Green onions are brimming with antioxidants that help fend off serious health problems.
[01:30:51.920 --> 01:30:55.400]  Studies have shown these chemicals can help protect against deadly cancers.
[01:30:55.400 --> 01:30:59.560]  They're also associated with a reduced risk of heart disease, diabetes and cataracts.
[01:30:59.560 --> 01:31:02.080]  But not all onions are created equal.
[01:31:02.080 --> 01:31:06.960]  Cornell University researchers say strong flavored varieties have the highest antioxidant
[01:31:06.960 --> 01:31:09.180]  and cancer protective properties.
[01:31:09.180 --> 01:31:13.680]  Those include the Western yellow, the New York bold and Northern red varieties.
[01:31:13.680 --> 01:31:18.480]  While mild and sweet onions like the Vidalia may be yummy, they contain fewer health boosting
[01:31:18.480 --> 01:31:21.440]  chemicals and offer a little protection against cancer.
[01:31:21.440 --> 01:31:30.540]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.540 --> 01:31:35.920]  This is building seven, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:35.920 --> 01:31:38.160]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.160 --> 01:31:42.960]  However, 1500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.960 --> 01:31:45.800]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.800 --> 01:31:48.400]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.400 --> 01:31:49.760]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.760 --> 01:31:50.760]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.760 --> 01:31:52.240]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:52.240 --> 01:31:53.240]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.240 --> 01:31:54.920]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.920 --> 01:31:57.520]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.520 --> 01:32:00.000]  Go to rememberbuildingseven.org today.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:02.800]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:02.800 --> 01:32:06.080]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.080 --> 01:32:09.720]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chem trails, but good luck getting
[01:32:09.720 --> 01:32:10.720]  them to pay for it.
[01:32:10.720 --> 01:32:14.320]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chem trails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.320 --> 01:32:18.120]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.120 --> 01:32:20.880]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:20.880 --> 01:32:22.000]  And we accept Bitcoin.
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:26.480]  As a multi-year A plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints, you
[01:32:26.480 --> 01:32:30.800]  can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:30.800 --> 01:32:31.880]  first time.
[01:32:31.880 --> 01:32:38.200]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.200 --> 01:32:42.960]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio
[01:32:42.960 --> 01:32:45.200]  Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.200 --> 01:32:50.320]  So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.320 --> 01:32:56.360]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.360 --> 01:32:58.600]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.600 --> 01:33:02.960]  May not actually be kidding about chem trails.
[01:33:02.960 --> 01:33:03.960]  Looking for some truth?
[01:33:03.960 --> 01:33:05.960]  You found it.
[01:33:05.960 --> 01:33:08.360]  Logosradio.com.
[01:33:08.360 --> 01:33:29.400]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Backpack Wheelbar Radio, and we're talking to Joseph
[01:33:29.400 --> 01:33:30.400]  in New York.
[01:33:30.400 --> 01:33:33.520]  Okay, Joseph, we do need to close up pretty soon.
[01:33:33.520 --> 01:33:37.160]  And Larry and Oliver have been real patient with us.
[01:33:37.160 --> 01:33:41.520]  Oh, we got someone on the callers?
[01:33:41.520 --> 01:33:43.680]  Wait, are you there?
[01:33:43.680 --> 01:33:45.680]  Yeah, I'm here.
[01:33:45.680 --> 01:33:46.680]  Oh, okay.
[01:33:46.680 --> 01:33:59.280]  Yeah, I guess the only thing I wanted to ask you is, in your opinion, is my tactic sound
[01:33:59.280 --> 01:34:00.280]  good?
[01:34:00.280 --> 01:34:08.160]  On the one hand, I'm going after the trooper for producing an instrument, which three courts
[01:34:08.160 --> 01:34:18.560]  have ruled confers jurisdiction upon the court when, obviously, it's just the simplified
[01:34:18.560 --> 01:34:24.360]  traffic information, and basically all the things I can charge them with for doing something
[01:34:24.360 --> 01:34:26.200]  like that fraudulently.
[01:34:26.200 --> 01:34:41.400]  And then I'm going after the judges for fraudulently ruling that the traffic tickets alone conferred
[01:34:41.400 --> 01:34:48.320]  jurisdiction upon the court, doing both of those claims in the same suit.
[01:34:48.320 --> 01:34:58.600]  Okay, so you're arguing that the citation is insufficient itself, and you're not addressing
[01:34:58.600 --> 01:35:06.720]  the merits of the claim in the citation, but you're saying the citation itself is insufficient?
[01:35:06.720 --> 01:35:09.000]  In my attack against the judges, I am.
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:14.040]  In my attack against the trooper, I'm claiming that the three different courts have ruled
[01:35:14.040 --> 01:35:15.880]  that it is sufficient.
[01:35:15.880 --> 01:35:24.400]  And because it's outside of his office to be creating government documents that confer
[01:35:24.400 --> 01:35:29.240]  jurisdiction upon the court, I'm going after him for a whole bunch of...
[01:35:29.240 --> 01:35:40.440]  Okay, how do you get to the issue that the citation is insufficient?
[01:35:40.440 --> 01:35:53.960]  Because the citation isn't a proper accusatory instrument, and it's not a verified complaint.
[01:35:53.960 --> 01:36:00.560]  So it confers neither personam nor subject to a jurisdiction over the prosecution.
[01:36:00.560 --> 01:36:09.320]  In Texas, we have a state law that says that when a police officer, while acting under
[01:36:09.320 --> 01:36:16.480]  the cut over his capacity, signs a citation that is presumed to be under oath.
[01:36:16.480 --> 01:36:20.680]  So he doesn't have to have it cited before a notary.
[01:36:20.680 --> 01:36:25.680]  You've probably got something similar in New York law.
[01:36:25.680 --> 01:36:32.720]  Yeah, no, there has to be a separate verified complaint.
[01:36:32.720 --> 01:36:38.560]  Complaint, that's who I was trying to get to, because that's an argument they bring
[01:36:38.560 --> 01:36:47.360]  in Texas, is that a prosecution commences by a complaint, and that the citation is insufficient
[01:36:47.360 --> 01:36:52.080]  that there must be a complaint filed with some magistrate.
[01:36:52.080 --> 01:36:58.200]  Exactly, that must be inscribed and verified, otherwise it's just hearsay.
[01:36:58.200 --> 01:37:04.120]  Okay, this is an issue that's been fought along a lot of times here, but nobody's won
[01:37:04.120 --> 01:37:05.120]  it so far.
[01:37:05.120 --> 01:37:09.040]  I would very much like to see how yours shakes out.
[01:37:09.040 --> 01:37:11.040]  Oh, okay.
[01:37:11.040 --> 01:37:12.040]  Okay.
[01:37:12.040 --> 01:37:15.840]  Your Lord, yeah, well that's it.
[01:37:15.840 --> 01:37:18.640]  Okay, keep us up to date on how this goes.
[01:37:18.640 --> 01:37:21.520]  Okay, we'll do, thank you.
[01:37:21.520 --> 01:37:23.640]  Okay, thank you, Joseph.
[01:37:23.640 --> 01:37:27.240]  Okay, now we're going to Larry in Arizona.
[01:37:27.240 --> 01:37:28.240]  Hello, Larry.
[01:37:28.240 --> 01:37:30.640]  What do you have for us today?
[01:37:30.640 --> 01:37:31.640]  Randy.
[01:37:31.640 --> 01:37:35.520]  Well, just a few quick questions.
[01:37:35.520 --> 01:37:39.800]  One, did Jeff Sedgwick have a website?
[01:37:39.800 --> 01:37:44.240]  Yes, he did, voidjudgments.com.
[01:37:44.240 --> 01:37:50.680]  Oh, okay, and oh, great.
[01:37:50.680 --> 01:37:51.680]  How old was Jeff?
[01:37:51.680 --> 01:37:52.680]  Do you have any idea?
[01:37:52.680 --> 01:37:57.840]  I think he was, he never told me exactly, but I think he was 80 or 81.
[01:37:57.840 --> 01:37:58.840]  Oh, wow.
[01:37:58.840 --> 01:38:02.720]  So he did okay then.
[01:38:02.720 --> 01:38:12.680]  Okay, your last segment with Joseph was great, it answered some of my questions.
[01:38:12.680 --> 01:38:15.120]  It also brought up a few.
[01:38:15.120 --> 01:38:24.200]  How, when I file a complaint for this false arrest, how do I differentiate between suing
[01:38:24.200 --> 01:38:29.720]  the officer in his personal capacity or his official capacity?
[01:38:29.720 --> 01:38:32.160]  Scope.
[01:38:32.160 --> 01:38:39.320]  When you claim, when you sue the officer for acting outside scope, that goes to personal
[01:38:39.320 --> 01:38:40.960]  capacity.
[01:38:40.960 --> 01:38:52.320]  If you sue him for acting within scope, but exceeding his authority, then that would go
[01:38:52.320 --> 01:38:55.000]  to his official capacity.
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:39:05.600]  Okay, and then when I do the tort letter, do you title a tort letter as a tort letter?
[01:39:05.600 --> 01:39:10.240]  No, you just title it, it's just a business letter, notice and opportunity.
[01:39:10.240 --> 01:39:14.080]  Oh, okay, so notice of claim or?
[01:39:14.080 --> 01:39:16.080]  Yeah, exactly.
[01:39:16.080 --> 01:39:17.080]  Okay.
[01:39:17.080 --> 01:39:24.040]  And you know what, I think that's all I really have tonight, I just needed some details to
[01:39:24.040 --> 01:39:27.640]  get me going again.
[01:39:27.640 --> 01:39:37.640]  And then whenever you feel like discussing under the private attorney general, I'm sure
[01:39:37.640 --> 01:39:40.320]  Oliver and I would love to hear that one.
[01:39:40.320 --> 01:39:44.200]  Okay, a private attorney general is relatively simple.
[01:39:44.200 --> 01:39:52.480]  There's a lot of guys out there in the patriot movement who claim that you can become a private
[01:39:52.480 --> 01:39:53.480]  attorney general.
[01:39:53.480 --> 01:39:56.840]  Well, I don't know about that.
[01:39:56.840 --> 01:40:05.640]  But when we speak to a private attorney general suit, we're not talking about someone becoming
[01:40:05.640 --> 01:40:07.800]  a private attorney general.
[01:40:07.800 --> 01:40:14.680]  It's just a name given to a certain type of suit that the courts allow.
[01:40:14.680 --> 01:40:22.280]  And that suit is where there's an issue of impropriety.
[01:40:22.280 --> 01:40:33.240]  But the cost or the harm is of such a low nature, it doesn't warrant civil litigation,
[01:40:33.240 --> 01:40:34.760]  like a traffic ticket.
[01:40:34.760 --> 01:40:40.760]  You can hardly sue somebody over 300 bucks.
[01:40:40.760 --> 01:40:45.640]  And with this type of suit, since you'd have to sue a governmental entity, you can't do
[01:40:45.640 --> 01:40:50.760]  it in a small claims court, you'd have to get a lawyer, you'd have to prepare a suit.
[01:40:50.760 --> 01:40:52.280]  This is going to get very expensive.
[01:40:52.280 --> 01:40:57.840]  So nobody's going to do that because it's just not economically feasible.
[01:40:57.840 --> 01:41:06.960]  So what the courts have allowed is that a person who has been harmed by this procedure,
[01:41:06.960 --> 01:41:11.960]  you can't just jump in and sue because you see something wrong.
[01:41:11.960 --> 01:41:17.400]  You have to be able to bring a genuine controversy to the court.
[01:41:17.400 --> 01:41:21.800]  And what that means is you have to have been harmed.
[01:41:21.800 --> 01:41:27.400]  So once you've received the ticket, you've been harmed.
[01:41:27.400 --> 01:41:35.320]  Now you can sue for your benefit and for the benefit of all of those who are similarly
[01:41:35.320 --> 01:41:38.240]  situated.
[01:41:38.240 --> 01:41:48.100]  And then if you win the case, say I do a calculation on how many traffic citations the particular
[01:41:48.100 --> 01:41:53.360]  jurisdiction has written in the last, say, three years.
[01:41:53.360 --> 01:42:00.360]  And I calculate how much that is and assert that they've been practicing these same procedures
[01:42:00.360 --> 01:42:06.160]  for the last three years and they've collected all of these fines and fees illegally.
[01:42:06.160 --> 01:42:10.800]  I get to make a claim against all those fines and fees.
[01:42:10.800 --> 01:42:17.560]  So it makes it so that it's economically feasible for someone to sue to write a wrong that's
[01:42:17.560 --> 01:42:25.120]  not so horrendous, like traffic citations.
[01:42:25.120 --> 01:42:30.280]  They're writing millions and millions of dollars worth of traffic citations.
[01:42:30.280 --> 01:42:36.280]  But each person isn't being fined enough to make it worth to go in after them.
[01:42:36.280 --> 01:42:37.280]  Okay.
[01:42:37.280 --> 01:42:38.280]  Does that make sense, Larry?
[01:42:38.280 --> 01:42:39.280]  Yes.
[01:42:39.280 --> 01:42:40.280]  Yeah.
[01:42:40.280 --> 01:42:41.280]  Yeah.
[01:42:41.280 --> 01:42:42.280]  No, I understand that.
[01:42:42.280 --> 01:42:47.540]  So when you file a suit like this, how do you identify that you're doing it as a private
[01:42:47.540 --> 01:42:48.840]  attorney general?
[01:42:48.840 --> 01:42:50.200]  You don't.
[01:42:50.200 --> 01:43:00.280]  You just, you make a claim, you actually do that, it would be in your prayer.
[01:43:00.280 --> 01:43:07.080]  You put into fact how much the city has or the jurisdiction has collected.
[01:43:07.080 --> 01:43:12.560]  You show that it's an ongoing pattern of abuse and they've harmed all these people and you
[01:43:12.560 --> 01:43:15.320]  make a claim for the full amount.
[01:43:15.320 --> 01:43:22.200]  The claim itself will tell them that it's a private attorney general suit.
[01:43:22.200 --> 01:43:28.140]  What the courts have done is the courts have ruled that the one guy says, well, he's claiming
[01:43:28.140 --> 01:43:30.480]  harm that wasn't his harm.
[01:43:30.480 --> 01:43:35.160]  And the court said, we're going to call this a private attorney general suit and allow
[01:43:35.160 --> 01:43:36.640]  him to do that.
[01:43:36.640 --> 01:43:40.680]  So that's actually what makes it a private attorney general suit.
[01:43:40.680 --> 01:43:43.240]  Hang on, about to go to break.
[01:43:43.240 --> 01:43:50.000]  Randy Kelton, vet pack with our radio, our call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:44:01.160]  Give us a call, we'll have the phone lines open all night, we'll be right back.
[01:44:01.160 --> 01:44:04.720]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:44:04.720 --> 01:44:08.720]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:44:08.720 --> 01:44:12.620]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products, featuring a great selection of high
[01:44:12.620 --> 01:44:14.600]  quality coins and precious metals.
[01:44:14.600 --> 01:44:18.480]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:44:18.480 --> 01:44:23.180]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers
[01:44:23.180 --> 01:44:24.180]  and journalists.
[01:44:24.180 --> 01:44:27.160]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:44:27.160 --> 01:44:31.400]  In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and
[01:44:31.400 --> 01:44:32.400]  Pollenburst.
[01:44:32.400 --> 01:44:37.280]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition
[01:44:37.280 --> 01:44:39.440]  at 10% above wholesale and more.
[01:44:39.440 --> 01:44:43.080]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:44:43.080 --> 01:44:46.400]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:44:46.400 --> 01:44:51.360]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:44:51.360 --> 01:44:54.480]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:44:54.480 --> 01:45:01.200]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:45:01.200 --> 01:45:04.400]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.400 --> 01:45:07.640]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.640 --> 01:45:14.320]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by
[01:45:14.320 --> 01:45:15.320]  step.
[01:45:15.320 --> 01:45:18.920]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.920 --> 01:45:23.160]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.160 --> 01:45:28.880]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[01:45:28.880 --> 01:45:34.800]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.800 --> 01:45:39.360]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:39.360 --> 01:45:43.640]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.640 --> 01:45:49.840]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.840 --> 01:45:52.600]  pro se tactics and much more.
[01:45:52.600 --> 01:46:20.960]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:20.960 --> 01:46:26.560]  Okay we are back, we're at the Kelton Vet Pack and Rule of Law Radio on this Friday,
[01:46:26.560 --> 01:46:35.880]  the 29th day of July 2016 and we're talking to Larry in Arizona.
[01:46:35.880 --> 01:46:40.360]  Okay Larry, did we have anything else for you or did we answer all your questions?
[01:46:40.360 --> 01:46:43.520]  Just one quick last wild question.
[01:46:43.520 --> 01:46:50.800]  Okay the case I'm going to sue over is the fact that the officer testified on the witness
[01:46:50.800 --> 01:46:57.760]  stand that no law enforcement agency in our county takes people before the magistrate
[01:46:57.760 --> 01:47:00.920]  before they throw them in jail.
[01:47:00.920 --> 01:47:04.000]  So that's why I want to do it as a private attorney general.
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:13.000]  Now most people sit in jail for 24 hours before they see the magistrate.
[01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:16.680]  How do you affix a dollar amount?
[01:47:16.680 --> 01:47:19.880]  Travizat v. State.
[01:47:19.880 --> 01:47:23.720]  Okay I'm familiar with that, that's a thousand dollars a minute.
[01:47:23.720 --> 01:47:29.800]  This, this, the thing he was like, it's on that order.
[01:47:29.800 --> 01:47:35.400]  But all you need is to show how you came up with the number.
[01:47:35.400 --> 01:47:36.400]  Okay.
[01:47:36.400 --> 01:47:41.040]  Doesn't matter if they like it or not, doesn't matter if they agree with it or not, you need
[01:47:41.040 --> 01:47:42.040]  a number.
[01:47:42.040 --> 01:47:49.040]  You know, I had some guys call me when I was in North Carolina and actually Robert Fox,
[01:47:49.040 --> 01:47:54.200]  he's pretty well known, he's been around a long time, had these people contact me.
[01:47:54.200 --> 01:48:02.960]  They had been filing liens against public officials and the feds were coming after them.
[01:48:02.960 --> 01:48:07.800]  And so I asked these guys, well, how much were the liens?
[01:48:07.800 --> 01:48:10.000]  Eleven trillion.
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:12.880]  Ooh, okay.
[01:48:12.880 --> 01:48:14.960]  What was the issue?
[01:48:14.960 --> 01:48:16.960]  Traffic.
[01:48:16.960 --> 01:48:23.240]  Guys, what were you thinking?
[01:48:23.240 --> 01:48:27.040]  And they asked me what they thought, said the feds were prosecuting them.
[01:48:27.040 --> 01:48:28.400]  I said, oh, you're going to win.
[01:48:28.400 --> 01:48:29.840]  Are we going to win?
[01:48:29.840 --> 01:48:32.040]  Oh yeah, you'll win.
[01:48:32.040 --> 01:48:38.280]  But you'll, you may beat the time, but you won't beat the ride.
[01:48:38.280 --> 01:48:46.360]  You pull this number out of the air and you file it against these public officials and
[01:48:46.360 --> 01:48:48.760]  ruin their credit.
[01:48:48.760 --> 01:48:56.440]  And technically it is legal, but it is an abuse of the system.
[01:48:56.440 --> 01:49:01.800]  So the US attorneys are going to come after you and they're going to cost you everything
[01:49:01.800 --> 01:49:09.080]  your own, you're likely to spend a year or two in jail and you'll lose your family, you'll
[01:49:09.080 --> 01:49:11.680]  lose your business, you'll lose your home.
[01:49:11.680 --> 01:49:15.720]  Once you've lost everything, they're going to dismiss the case.
[01:49:15.720 --> 01:49:17.960]  This is what happens when you mess with them.
[01:49:17.960 --> 01:49:20.880]  When you poke the bear too hard.
[01:49:20.880 --> 01:49:25.480]  That's kind of a little bit off subject, but 11 trillion, how did they come up with that
[01:49:25.480 --> 01:49:26.480]  number?
[01:49:26.480 --> 01:49:29.600]  Oh, well, we just thought it up.
[01:49:29.600 --> 01:49:35.360]  No, no, no, no, no, you have to be able to show how you got this number.
[01:49:35.360 --> 01:49:42.960]  And Travisant has been a good case to show I was held illegally for this long.
[01:49:42.960 --> 01:49:48.440]  The jury granted me this much, or you can say Travisant was held this long.
[01:49:48.440 --> 01:49:55.800]  The jury granted him this much and that calculates out to this much a minute, multiply this time
[01:49:55.800 --> 01:50:00.560]  I was in jail, now you got a number.
[01:50:00.560 --> 01:50:04.240]  They're going to argue with the number, who cares?
[01:50:04.240 --> 01:50:13.000]  Because at the end of the day, there's only one number the jury's going to remember.
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:14.760]  That's the one you walked in the door with.
[01:50:14.760 --> 01:50:17.240]  Okay, go ahead, Larry, I kind of interrupted you there.
[01:50:17.240 --> 01:50:24.680]  Yeah, the reason I was just asking is, I mean, this county arrests hundreds of people.
[01:50:24.680 --> 01:50:28.960]  They sit in jail for 24 hours on an average.
[01:50:28.960 --> 01:50:31.800]  So I mean, the number would be in the millions.
[01:50:31.800 --> 01:50:34.120]  That's wonderful.
[01:50:34.120 --> 01:50:41.520]  The bigger the better, so long as you can show how you got that number.
[01:50:41.520 --> 01:50:49.720]  If you can establish a mean average of time someone arrested spins in jail before they
[01:50:49.720 --> 01:50:51.400]  brought before a magistrate.
[01:50:51.400 --> 01:50:58.600]  Just do you an average, multiply it times to people, you got a number.
[01:50:58.600 --> 01:51:03.800]  Okay, I mean, it's an embarrassingly high number.
[01:51:03.800 --> 01:51:05.480]  That's why I was asking.
[01:51:05.480 --> 01:51:08.440]  It should be embarrassingly high.
[01:51:08.440 --> 01:51:13.960]  Actually it's not that high when you look at how much money they collect.
[01:51:13.960 --> 01:51:19.240]  You're in Arizona, you need to talk to your state police.
[01:51:19.240 --> 01:51:26.600]  The state police generally keeps statistics and I know they do that in Texas.
[01:51:26.600 --> 01:51:32.800]  See if you can find out what the average conviction rate is for all crimes across the board.
[01:51:32.800 --> 01:51:33.800]  Okay.
[01:51:33.800 --> 01:51:38.360]  You got any idea what that's going to be?
[01:51:38.360 --> 01:51:39.840]  No.
[01:51:39.840 --> 01:51:49.200]  Well, I'm in Texas and Chief Acevedo, Chief of Police for Austin was trying to get authorization
[01:51:49.200 --> 01:51:56.120]  to take blood from suspected drunk drivers on the side of the highway.
[01:51:56.120 --> 01:52:03.640]  And there was a big city hall meeting and I collared Acevedo with a mic when he come
[01:52:03.640 --> 01:52:04.640]  in the door.
[01:52:04.640 --> 01:52:09.040]  We're broadcasting live from that location.
[01:52:09.040 --> 01:52:13.040]  And ask him why he needed this and he said, well, so we can increase our conviction rate.
[01:52:13.040 --> 01:52:16.560]  I said, well, Mr. Acevedo, do you know what your conviction rate is now?
[01:52:16.560 --> 01:52:18.000]  He said, well, I'm not sure.
[01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:19.640]  I said, well, how about a guess?
[01:52:19.640 --> 01:52:20.640]  Oh, 70 or 80%.
[01:52:20.640 --> 01:52:22.880]  I said, how about a little higher?
[01:52:22.880 --> 01:52:28.720]  How about 90, maybe 95, 96, 99.6?
[01:52:28.720 --> 01:52:34.760]  Oh, no, no, no, wait a minute.
[01:52:34.760 --> 01:52:36.920]  I've got my statistician here.
[01:52:36.920 --> 01:52:41.840]  He calls this guy over and he said, ask him, what is the average conviction rate in the
[01:52:41.840 --> 01:52:44.400]  state of Texas for all crimes across the board?
[01:52:44.400 --> 01:52:48.160]  And the guy kind of hemmed and hawed and looked down at his shoes.
[01:52:48.160 --> 01:52:50.200]  And I said, come on, come on, you know the number.
[01:52:50.200 --> 01:52:59.560]  Oh, well, gee, as I said, it's about 90, oh, yeah, about 95, about 96, maybe, maybe 99.6.
[01:52:59.560 --> 01:53:06.400]  Well, see Chief, how much higher can you get it?
[01:53:06.400 --> 01:53:12.160]  We live in the worst police state the world has ever seen.
[01:53:12.160 --> 01:53:19.440]  And what I see as the reason is we're not bringing people before a magistrate.
[01:53:19.440 --> 01:53:26.280]  Larry, if you will send me an email, I'll send you a document I just rewrote.
[01:53:26.280 --> 01:53:33.120]  I took the habeas corpus off of Jewish imprudence, which I am trying to get back up, by the way.
[01:53:33.120 --> 01:53:38.960]  A friend of mine originally purchased that domain name for me and he had a company that
[01:53:38.960 --> 01:53:43.200]  was a reseller of domain names and he died.
[01:53:43.200 --> 01:53:48.600]  And now I can't get the name, I can't get it renewed.
[01:53:48.600 --> 01:53:51.200]  So I'm working on that.
[01:53:51.200 --> 01:54:00.720]  But anyway, I took the habeas corpus and rewrote it for a guy who was convicted of a felony
[01:54:00.720 --> 01:54:03.280]  in 03.
[01:54:03.280 --> 01:54:07.160]  And there is no criminal complaint in the record, so I'm charging them.
[01:54:07.160 --> 01:54:10.680]  And I go through all of these steps.
[01:54:10.680 --> 01:54:16.000]  I go through the problem with bringing before a magistrate.
[01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:25.920]  Now this is written on Texas law, but it'll give you a good idea of what to look for in
[01:54:25.920 --> 01:54:28.280]  Arizona law.
[01:54:28.280 --> 01:54:35.640]  How do they justify this hearing where they only read you your rights and tell you what
[01:54:35.640 --> 01:54:39.520]  the bond is?
[01:54:39.520 --> 01:54:49.640]  The reason I ask the question that way is generally it is a magistrate that sets bond.
[01:54:49.640 --> 01:54:54.680]  After an examining trial, the magistrate will make a determination of probable cause.
[01:54:54.680 --> 01:55:00.760]  If he determines that there is probable cause, then he will set bond at that time.
[01:55:00.760 --> 01:55:07.860]  So if you brought before a magistrate and he doesn't hold an examining hearing, he advises
[01:55:07.860 --> 01:55:10.200]  you of your right and what the bond is.
[01:55:10.200 --> 01:55:13.160]  Well, he didn't set the bond.
[01:55:13.160 --> 01:55:16.720]  So how did they get the bond set?
[01:55:16.720 --> 01:55:20.760]  Was this something done arbitrarily and capriciously?
[01:55:20.760 --> 01:55:28.520]  There's gonna be laws that stipulate how an examining trial is held and how bond is set.
[01:55:28.520 --> 01:55:36.040]  And this magistration hearings, what they call it, doesn't meet any of those requirements.
[01:55:36.040 --> 01:55:39.680]  So you'll see how I track through the code.
[01:55:39.680 --> 01:55:46.520]  It is a little complex because I do take the code apart in tiny pieces.
[01:55:46.520 --> 01:55:50.960]  But I think you will find this very enlightening.
[01:55:50.960 --> 01:55:54.960]  Okay, that would be fantastic.
[01:55:54.960 --> 01:55:57.360]  I will get an email up to you this evening.
[01:55:57.360 --> 01:55:58.560]  Okay, good.
[01:55:58.560 --> 01:56:09.120]  And I address how in 1216 AD, King John was being attacked by the French.
[01:56:09.120 --> 01:56:14.560]  They had put together this surprise attack, but it got out before they got there.
[01:56:14.560 --> 01:56:22.080]  Well, the royal family was broke and they didn't have an army, they'd spent everything
[01:56:22.080 --> 01:56:27.520]  in the crusades and France is threatening to invade.
[01:56:27.520 --> 01:56:33.560]  So he went to the dukes to get them to bring their armies to fight off this invasion.
[01:56:33.560 --> 01:56:38.160]  And they were pretty upset at him and told him the only way they would do that is if
[01:56:38.160 --> 01:56:40.880]  he signed this document.
[01:56:40.880 --> 01:56:46.560]  He agreed, they pushed the French back, then he refused to sign the document.
[01:56:46.560 --> 01:56:49.800]  They dragged him down to the River Thames, threatened to cut his head off if he didn't
[01:56:49.800 --> 01:56:56.680]  sign the Magna Carta, and the Magna Carta established that if a free man is arrested
[01:56:56.680 --> 01:57:02.520]  for any reason, with or without a warrant, he is to be taken to the nearest magistrate
[01:57:02.520 --> 01:57:09.160]  by the most direct route and the arresting officer is to explain himself.
[01:57:09.160 --> 01:57:13.760]  It's not because he didn't trust the officers to make good arrests.
[01:57:13.760 --> 01:57:18.560]  It's because they didn't want the public to feel like a police officer had the power
[01:57:18.560 --> 01:57:22.480]  to arrest and imprison, to punish.
[01:57:22.480 --> 01:57:26.600]  It was the magistrate who was intended to hold the key to the jailhouse door by way
[01:57:26.600 --> 01:57:30.560]  of an examining trial and a determination of probable cause.
[01:57:30.560 --> 01:57:35.200]  They took that out in 1965 in Texas.
[01:57:35.200 --> 01:57:39.560]  That's when it changed and we've gone downhill ever since.
[01:57:39.560 --> 01:57:47.880]  It worked for 760 years, or 50 years, they took it out and now we've deteriorated into
[01:57:47.880 --> 01:57:50.600]  the worst police state the world's ever seen.
[01:57:50.600 --> 01:57:59.280]  We need to put it back and look close at the Criminal Procedure Code for Arizona, especially
[01:57:59.280 --> 01:58:03.040]  look at the section on Bring Before Magistrate.
[01:58:03.040 --> 01:58:11.080]  You're going to have the law in there and then read this habeas and then it'll give
[01:58:11.080 --> 01:58:14.080]  you kind of a blueprint for how to go through this.
[01:58:14.080 --> 01:58:17.720]  Okay, about to go to break.
[01:58:17.720 --> 01:58:24.480]  This is Randy Kelton, VetPAC, Radio, and thank you, Larry, when we come back, we're going
[01:58:24.480 --> 01:58:27.680]  to go to Oliver in Tennessee.
[01:58:27.680 --> 01:58:32.600]  So on the break, you might go look at some of our sponsors and if we have any services
[01:58:32.600 --> 01:58:37.360]  you can use, if you use our sponsors, it'll help support this network and we need all
[01:58:37.360 --> 01:58:41.920]  the support we can get right now because we're kind of struggling to upgrade our equipment
[01:58:41.920 --> 01:58:43.960]  and it's been difficult this year.
[01:58:43.960 --> 01:58:50.240]  Okay, we'll be right back.
[01:58:50.240 --> 01:58:55.640]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.640 --> 01:58:58.460]  because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.460 --> 01:59:03.840]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[01:59:03.840 --> 01:59:07.080]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:59:07.080 --> 01:59:08.880]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:08.880 --> 01:59:14.840]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[01:59:14.840 --> 01:59:18.560]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.560 --> 01:59:23.560]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[01:59:23.560 --> 01:59:28.280]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.280 --> 01:59:33.420]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.420 --> 01:59:43.840]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.840 --> 01:59:47.920]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.920 --> 01:59:48.920]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.920 --> 02:00:03.920]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.