ROL_2016-07-08_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:07.720]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli
[00:07.720 --> 00:10.360]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:10.360 --> 00:23.160]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.160 --> 00:29.360]  Markets for Friday the 8th of June 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,365.91
[00:29.360 --> 00:36.040]  an ounce, silver $20.22 an ounce, Texas crude $45.14 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:36.040 --> 00:44.720]  sitting in about 662 U.S. currency.
[00:44.720 --> 00:50.560]  Today in history, the year 1947, reports are broadcast that a UFO crash landed in Roswell,
[00:50.560 --> 00:54.480]  New Mexico in what became known as the Roswell UFO Incident.
[00:54.480 --> 00:59.080]  By far the most cataloged, controversial, and covered up UFO crash in American history,
[00:59.080 --> 01:07.760]  the Roswell Incident marks the beginning of modern day UFOlogy, today in history.
[01:07.760 --> 01:12.480]  In recent news, during a peaceful anti-police brutality protest Thursday night in Dallas,
[01:12.480 --> 01:17.520]  Texas, 25-year-old Micah Xavier Johnson from Mesquite, Texas, a military veteran in the
[01:17.520 --> 01:22.720]  U.S. Army Reserve from March 2009 to April 2015, and combat soldier with deployment in
[01:22.720 --> 01:28.240]  Afghanistan from late 2013 to mid 2014, who had no criminal record or known terror ties,
[01:28.240 --> 01:30.960]  suddenly began a police targeting sniper spree.
[01:30.960 --> 01:34.480]  Though Dallas Police Chief David Brown did suggest that other suspects assisted in the
[01:34.480 --> 01:38.760]  coordination along with law enforcement, previously stating that three people were in custody
[01:38.760 --> 01:42.480]  and that multiple shooters were involved, Johnson told negotiators that he was acting
[01:42.480 --> 01:43.480]  solo.
[01:43.480 --> 01:46.780]  The reason for his spree, as he then told them, was due to the two African American
[01:46.780 --> 01:50.260]  men recently shot by police in Louisiana and Minnesota.
[01:50.260 --> 01:54.280]  Five police officers were killed and seven officers wounded, along with two non-law enforcement
[01:54.280 --> 01:56.360]  citizens who were also injured.
[01:56.360 --> 02:00.480]  Johnson was eventually killed by a bomb drone after several hours of standoff negotiations
[02:00.480 --> 02:02.680]  with police in a parking garage.
[02:02.680 --> 02:05.520]  Federal law enforcement are now saying that Johnson was the only shooter.
[02:05.520 --> 02:09.680]  This is just the deadliest of the shooting sprees that has been occurring nationwide,
[02:09.680 --> 02:19.280]  where gunmen in Tennessee, Missouri, and Georgia have recently targeted and killed police officers.
[02:19.280 --> 02:23.360]  Google is testing new cryptography algorithms that hopefully quantum computing in the future
[02:23.360 --> 02:27.300]  might not be able to decipher the fears that processing power offered by soon-to-emerge
[02:27.300 --> 02:31.840]  quantum computers could be enough to decrypt any internet communications that were recorded
[02:31.840 --> 02:32.840]  today.
[02:32.840 --> 02:36.720]  So in order to preemptively future-proof today's internet communications, Google is deploying
[02:36.720 --> 02:40.960]  what it's calling post-quantum cryptography, testing its effectiveness with their browser,
[02:40.960 --> 02:41.960]  Chrome Canary.
[02:41.960 --> 02:45.240]  For the test, they will be using a cryptographic algorithm called New Hope.
[02:45.240 --> 02:48.920]  However, with the test lasting two years, Google hopes it can replace the algorithm
[02:48.920 --> 02:54.000]  with something more up-to-date, down the line.
[02:54.000 --> 03:23.760]  This is Brooke Rhodey with your Lowdown for July 8th, 2016.
[03:23.760 --> 03:24.760]  Okay.
[03:24.760 --> 03:25.760]  We are back.
[03:25.760 --> 03:26.760]  We're in Chilton.
[03:26.760 --> 03:35.080]  In fact, we were on radio, and we're talking to Doug in Ohio.
[03:35.080 --> 03:39.800]  So that's kind of how I'm looking at this, Doug.
[03:39.800 --> 03:43.600]  I'd like to take a bank shot at them.
[03:43.600 --> 03:51.280]  Instead of going after them for wrongful foreclosure, we come back with an intentional...
[03:51.280 --> 03:54.240]  The close is already over.
[03:54.240 --> 03:57.800]  Challenged subject matter jurisdiction can be brought at any time, no matter how remote
[03:57.800 --> 04:00.960]  in history.
[04:00.960 --> 04:06.600]  So we follow the challenge subject matter jurisdiction, and at the same time, follow
[04:06.600 --> 04:07.600]  the less pendants.
[04:07.600 --> 04:08.600]  Oh, okay.
[04:08.600 --> 04:16.160]  The less pendants will make it real tough for them to try to sell the property, because
[04:16.160 --> 04:21.480]  nobody in their right mind will buy the property once there's a less pendants.
[04:21.480 --> 04:22.480]  Okay.
[04:22.480 --> 04:23.480]  Has the...
[04:23.480 --> 04:24.480]  Okay.
[04:24.480 --> 04:25.480]  We've already got the eviction notice.
[04:25.480 --> 04:26.480]  Great.
[04:26.480 --> 04:27.480]  Okay.
[04:27.480 --> 04:39.760]  We can ask the court to stay the plaintiff from eviction, but you can't ask the court
[04:39.760 --> 04:47.880]  to stay the magistrate who issues the order.
[04:47.880 --> 04:55.760]  You can't suppress the order, because the court who issued the order had exclusive jurisdiction,
[04:55.760 --> 05:01.240]  and the higher courts have no power to touch their exclusive jurisdiction, so they can't
[05:01.240 --> 05:04.600]  stay this judge.
[05:04.600 --> 05:10.320]  They'll have to stay the plaintiff, but that they can't do.
[05:10.320 --> 05:14.240]  Gain, then, if they stay the plaintiff.
[05:14.240 --> 05:15.240]  Yes.
[05:15.240 --> 05:21.320]  For stay the plaintiff from prosecuting the eviction.
[05:21.320 --> 05:25.480]  Failing that, have you ever filed a bankruptcy?
[05:25.480 --> 05:26.840]  No.
[05:26.840 --> 05:35.520]  Then, if all else fails, you know, they'll give you an order to vacate, and, okay, let
[05:35.520 --> 05:36.520]  me back up.
[05:36.520 --> 05:37.520]  Have they had...
[05:37.520 --> 05:42.520]  Do they have an order to vacate?
[05:42.520 --> 05:43.520]  Yes.
[05:43.520 --> 05:50.520]  The sheriff hung an eviction notice on the door.
[05:50.520 --> 05:51.520]  Okay.
[05:51.520 --> 05:55.400]  Then, they're likely, you better file bankruptcy.
[05:55.400 --> 05:59.400]  Okay, third.
[05:59.400 --> 06:03.200]  Bankruptcy at this point is the only sure way to stop them.
[06:03.200 --> 06:08.560]  Once you have the bankruptcy filing in, then you can come back and sue, and ask the bankruptcy
[06:08.560 --> 06:18.240]  court to maintain the automatic state, there's an automatic state when you file bankruptcy.
[06:18.240 --> 06:23.040]  Would that be, what kind, 7, 11, or 13, or?
[06:23.040 --> 06:27.720]  A 7, file a 7 and claim the property is unsecured.
[06:27.720 --> 06:28.720]  Okay.
[06:28.720 --> 06:34.800]  So, I would just go down to the bankruptcy court in Cleveland here and ask them for the
[06:34.800 --> 06:36.280]  paperwork for that?
[06:36.280 --> 06:37.280]  Yes.
[06:37.280 --> 06:38.280]  Yes.
[06:38.280 --> 06:39.280]  Okay.
[06:39.280 --> 06:42.880]  And is it very difficult to do, or I don't know...
[06:42.880 --> 06:49.080]  No, it's not terribly difficult to do, but you probably need someone who knows how to
[06:49.080 --> 06:51.520]  do it, and I am not the bankruptcy expert.
[06:51.520 --> 06:57.240]  If you can't find anybody, let me know, I'm sure I know somebody who can help you with
[06:57.240 --> 06:58.240]  it.
[06:58.240 --> 06:59.240]  Okay.
[06:59.240 --> 07:00.240]  And, okay.
[07:00.240 --> 07:04.920]  So, I get that filled out and filed, and that's an automatic stay, is that what you said?
[07:04.920 --> 07:05.920]  Yes.
[07:05.920 --> 07:07.920]  Bankruptcy will give you an automatic stay.
[07:07.920 --> 07:08.920]  Okay.
[07:08.920 --> 07:09.920]  Good.
[07:09.920 --> 07:10.920]  Okay.
[07:10.920 --> 07:17.120]  This is the only time I suggest bankruptcy is after the eviction hearing, once the red
[07:17.120 --> 07:20.720]  tag has been put on your door, now is the time for an eviction hearing.
[07:20.720 --> 07:22.800]  I mean for bankruptcy.
[07:22.800 --> 07:23.800]  Okay.
[07:23.800 --> 07:24.800]  Is there...
[07:24.800 --> 07:25.800]  Okay.
[07:25.800 --> 07:31.160]  Any need for us to talk about this tomorrow, or just go ahead and do what you're saying?
[07:31.160 --> 07:34.360]  You call me tomorrow and we'll talk about it.
[07:34.360 --> 07:35.360]  Okay.
[07:35.360 --> 07:36.360]  Very good.
[07:36.360 --> 07:37.360]  Thanks so much, Randy.
[07:37.360 --> 07:38.360]  All righty.
[07:38.360 --> 07:39.360]  Okay.
[07:39.360 --> 07:42.160]  Now we're going to go to Tommy in Texas.
[07:42.160 --> 07:43.160]  Hello, Tommy.
[07:43.160 --> 07:44.160]  Hey, Randy.
[07:44.160 --> 07:45.160]  Good evening.
[07:45.160 --> 07:46.160]  Thanks for taking my call.
[07:46.160 --> 07:49.160]  Can you hear me okay?
[07:49.160 --> 07:52.800]  What do you have for us today?
[07:52.800 --> 08:02.960]  Well, originally, I think, if you remember, we spoke a month ago regarding an alleged
[08:02.960 --> 08:11.040]  traffic violation in Cherokee County where I had the judge of Cherokee County, JP2, had
[08:11.040 --> 08:15.720]  filed a criminal trespass warrant against me after I called 911 on him for refusing
[08:15.720 --> 08:21.200]  to show me the court files regarding my cause.
[08:21.200 --> 08:23.320]  Whoa, hold on.
[08:23.320 --> 08:28.160]  He filed a criminal trespass warning on you because you called 911.
[08:28.160 --> 08:30.280]  He did.
[08:30.280 --> 08:36.280]  Have you read 3606, Texas Penal Code?
[08:36.280 --> 08:37.280]  3606?
[08:37.280 --> 08:40.360]  No, I have not.
[08:40.360 --> 08:43.440]  You need to read that.
[08:43.440 --> 08:46.520]  Make the obstruction retaliation.
[08:46.520 --> 08:48.320]  Okay.
[08:48.320 --> 09:00.400]  Now I just received in the mail this previous week a courtesy notice from a new court, JP
[09:00.400 --> 09:05.400]  Court in the same county stating that they have received my citation and that the venue
[09:05.400 --> 09:08.120]  has been changed to their court.
[09:08.120 --> 09:12.640]  They gave me a new appearance of on or before July 14th.
[09:12.640 --> 09:19.760]  Now this is after I've already filed all my motions and affidavits and challenging jurisdiction
[09:19.760 --> 09:21.760]  with JP2 Court.
[09:21.760 --> 09:28.200]  Well, I called the court this previous week and said, do you have all my motions that
[09:28.200 --> 09:29.200]  I filed?
[09:29.200 --> 09:30.200]  And I named off all of them.
[09:30.200 --> 09:32.960]  They said, no, we do not.
[09:32.960 --> 09:40.840]  They had a copy of something that is from the prosecutor's office that has, well, they
[09:40.840 --> 09:49.480]  just got those today, but they have, today they got in a copy of the file that I, of
[09:49.480 --> 09:57.680]  the motions that I filed with JP2 and they got those copies from the county attorney.
[09:57.680 --> 10:06.600]  They did not receive anything from JP2 directly from the, and supposedly he had recused himself
[10:06.600 --> 10:07.600]  from this case.
[10:07.600 --> 10:08.600]  I haven't seen that yet.
[10:08.600 --> 10:18.840]  Wait a minute, hold on, you used a pronoun, he, county attorney or the original JP, the
[10:18.840 --> 10:19.840]  magistrate.
[10:19.840 --> 10:26.840]  The original JP Judge Johnson, allegedly recused himself.
[10:26.840 --> 10:30.760]  Well, he's not totally stupid.
[10:30.760 --> 10:36.160]  I guess he sees the writing on the wall.
[10:36.160 --> 10:43.640]  But apparently they, everything that they have, the new court, all they have is copies
[10:43.640 --> 10:50.560]  of all the, like they have a copy of the public information I requested with that court and
[10:50.560 --> 10:56.000]  some other copies of information I requested, but they had no, apparently they have no original
[10:56.000 --> 11:05.280]  papers, which under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 31.05, it says we're in
[11:05.280 --> 11:11.320]  order for a change of venue of any court in any criminal cause in this state has been
[11:11.320 --> 11:17.320]  made the clerk of the court where the prosecution spending shall make out a certified copy of
[11:17.320 --> 11:24.080]  the court's order directing such change of venue along together with the, it says with
[11:24.080 --> 11:30.480]  all the original papers and said calls and also a certificate of the said clerk under
[11:30.480 --> 11:36.840]  his official seal that such papers are the papers in all the papers on file in said cause
[11:36.840 --> 11:43.440]  and he shall transmit the same to the clerk of the court to which the venue has been changed.
[11:43.440 --> 11:49.800]  The judge today, Judge Grimes in the new court said, I just got copies of your motions from
[11:49.800 --> 11:58.400]  the county attorney and it had, apparently it had the JP2 court's file stamp on it,
[11:58.400 --> 12:05.160]  which I witnessed him stamping it and, and filling it out. So, and I asked him, are those
[12:05.160 --> 12:07.120]  the original? He said, these are copies.
[12:07.120 --> 12:10.920]  I don't know what happened to these copies.
[12:10.920 --> 12:20.120]  Okay. What was the, the Code of Criminal Procedure? What was the statute?
[12:20.120 --> 12:30.080]  Section 31.05, 31.05. Clerk's duties on change of venue.
[12:30.080 --> 12:49.600]  Okay. So I'm just applying this, 31.05. Okay. It required a certificate. You need to put
[12:49.600 --> 12:51.720]  in an information request.
[12:51.720 --> 12:57.200]  Wait, say that again.
[12:57.200 --> 13:02.880]  It requires a certified copy of the court's order directing the change of venue be transmitted
[13:02.880 --> 13:12.080]  to the new court and a certificate of the, of the clerk from the, from the original case
[13:12.080 --> 13:17.640]  or the original court under his official seal that such papers are the papers and all the
[13:17.640 --> 13:22.720]  papers on file in said court in said cause.
[13:22.720 --> 13:35.680]  Okay. What I'm looking for is something to ask for. Also a certificate of the said clerk.
[13:35.680 --> 13:36.920]  That's what we want to look for.
[13:36.920 --> 13:41.920]  In fact, I was, as I was waiting for you to take my call, I'm preparing a, an information
[13:41.920 --> 13:47.880]  request for the original court stating that I want a copy of the certified copy of Justice
[13:47.880 --> 13:53.960]  Court Precinct 2's order directing the change of venue to Justice Court Precinct 3. And
[13:53.960 --> 14:00.320]  number two, a copy of clerk's certificate under the clerk's official seal certifying
[14:00.320 --> 14:07.400]  that the papers transferred to JP3 court are in fact all, are the e-papers and all the
[14:07.400 --> 14:09.480]  original papers in said case.
[14:09.480 --> 14:13.640]  Let me, let me make a suggestion.
[14:13.640 --> 14:14.640]  Okay.
[14:14.640 --> 14:23.000]  Go, rewrite that and make a request for all documents referenced by Texas Code of Criminal
[14:23.000 --> 14:24.000]  Procedure 31.05.
[14:24.000 --> 14:32.920]  Okay. I've already done that and he refused to give me any, to even, to give me a copy
[14:32.920 --> 14:35.000]  of any of the papers or even to see them.
[14:35.000 --> 14:37.600]  Wait a minute. Wait a minute. You said he, the first judge?
[14:37.600 --> 14:47.160]  Yes, I'm sorry. The Judge Johnson in the original JP2 court refused to allow me, to allow me
[14:47.160 --> 14:55.640]  to gain access or inspect my file, the court's file regarding my cause and said if I wanted
[14:55.640 --> 14:59.400]  to see it, then I need to call the county attorney and he will, and the county attorney
[14:59.400 --> 15:01.520]  said he'll let me see it at pretrial.
[15:01.520 --> 15:16.480]  So, you need to file a 39.03 official oppression against the judge with this new judge.
[15:16.480 --> 15:23.760]  And the new judge today from JP3 said, had told me, I'm not going to, we're not going
[15:23.760 --> 15:27.240]  to go forward on your case until you come in and you plead, we are not doing anything
[15:27.240 --> 15:28.240]  until you plead.
[15:28.240 --> 15:30.280]  We're not going to, I'm not going to look at your motion.
[15:30.280 --> 15:31.760]  Okay. Okay. Hold on.
[15:31.760 --> 15:32.760]  Make a plea.
[15:32.760 --> 15:41.200]  Hold on. I think I hear music. I've got too many pages up. Let me check. There we go.
[15:41.200 --> 15:45.320]  Okay. I got a minute. Okay. I'm good.
[15:45.320 --> 15:50.960]  So he, the judge in JP court, three judge Grimes, the new judge apparently told me he
[15:50.960 --> 15:58.720]  will not read any of the motions or make any decisions until I have made a plea.
[15:58.720 --> 16:08.320]  Okay. Here is the deal. Make a plea. That would be an arraignment hearing. Okay. You're
[16:08.320 --> 16:13.480]  obviously doing some research. So send me an email, randy at rule of law radio.com and
[16:13.480 --> 16:19.760]  I will send you my challenge subject matter jurisdiction. And when we come back on the
[16:19.760 --> 16:24.400]  other side, we'll talk about my set challenge to subject matter jurisdiction because it's
[16:24.400 --> 16:31.520]  got some other interesting stuff in there and some stuff about him calling you to come
[16:31.520 --> 16:37.760]  in and enter a plea. I want to know who he got that authority. Hang on. Randy Kelton,
[16:37.760 --> 16:58.680]  we'll be right back. Rule of law radio. I'll call it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right
[16:58.680 --> 17:01.600]  back.
[17:01.600 --> 17:05.880]  Did you know that the Logos radio network is a truly listener supported radio network
[17:05.880 --> 17:10.440]  on top of the on air talents, producers and other hardworking individuals working behind
[17:10.440 --> 17:14.720]  the scenes. Logos radio network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners
[17:14.720 --> 17:19.320]  like you. And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual
[17:19.320 --> 17:23.920]  fundraisers, which help keep the lights on and Logos radio network on the air. Head over
[17:23.920 --> 17:29.480]  to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution. Every $25 donation enters you for a chance
[17:29.480 --> 17:34.920]  to win prizes from central Texas gun works. First prize being a spike skull lower receiver.
[17:34.920 --> 17:38.960]  Second prize being a tourist curve. Ten winners will receive gift cards from all about vapor.
[17:38.960 --> 17:43.680]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary
[17:43.680 --> 17:49.120]  jar of my magic mud. Donations by all major credit cards are accepted as well as contributions
[17:49.120 --> 17:54.280]  by Bitcoin. The Logos radio network fundraiser. Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for
[17:54.280 --> 18:00.920]  more information and to donate to keep the Logos radio network on the air. Through advances
[18:00.920 --> 18:06.640]  in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. People feed
[18:06.640 --> 18:11.720]  their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that. Our primary
[18:11.720 --> 18:17.440]  defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. In a
[18:17.440 --> 18:23.160]  world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[18:23.160 --> 18:28.280]  provide the nutrients you need. Logos radio network gets many requests to endorse all
[18:28.280 --> 18:33.880]  sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so much,
[18:33.880 --> 18:39.840]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When
[18:39.840 --> 18:46.240]  you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality
[18:46.240 --> 18:52.880]  radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[18:52.880 --> 18:58.920]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[18:58.920 --> 19:25.000]  We're here now. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. Logosradionetwork.com.
[19:25.000 --> 19:36.360]  We are back. We're talking to Doug. We're talking to Tommy in Texas. Okay. We're about
[19:36.360 --> 19:44.560]  to get to the good part here, Tommy. I've got a couple of information requests that
[19:44.560 --> 19:55.920]  you absolutely have to get. Just a second. Let me go sign them, and I'll read them to
[19:55.920 --> 20:01.360]  you. Google traffic. I can barely hear you, Randy. Okay. That's because if I don't put
[20:01.360 --> 20:06.720]  my face right against the mic, nobody can hear me. Okay. I have an information request
[20:06.720 --> 20:14.280]  here. The first one says, evidence of authority to enforce the provisions of the Texas traffic
[20:14.280 --> 20:24.680]  laws, chapter 644, for all officers so authorized in the city of whatever. In this case, it'd
[20:24.680 --> 20:35.040]  be the county of Cherokee. That will jerk a knot in their shorts. I've got another document
[20:35.040 --> 20:40.040]  that will explain what those are here in a second. Here's the second one.
[20:40.040 --> 20:47.120]  If I send you an email, you'll send those to me? Yes, I will. The second one, you might
[20:47.120 --> 20:57.200]  want to use my form because they'll recognize it. Okay. It's very obnoxious. It's got all
[20:57.200 --> 21:02.280]  this stuff in there that I've learned to put in over the years of messing with them to
[21:02.280 --> 21:08.320]  keep them from schooling with me. Okay. The second one, complete list of all training
[21:08.320 --> 21:15.640]  provided for Cherokee County peace officers intended to ensure compliance with the requirements
[21:15.640 --> 21:31.280]  for authorization to enforce the transportation code and as contemplated by 644.101 and 701.001
[21:31.280 --> 21:39.280]  police transportation code. These are the two that when I filed them in Decatur, they
[21:39.280 --> 21:45.680]  got the chief called me because I knew him personally and I could hear him doing the
[21:45.680 --> 21:51.800]  chicken dance on the other side of the phone and he wound up sending me a letter saying
[21:51.800 --> 22:02.760]  he could not respond to my, he had no documents responsive to my request as his officers do
[22:02.760 --> 22:14.240]  not enforce the Texas transportation code. Is that cool or what? That is awesome. Okay.
[22:14.240 --> 22:25.720]  Now I've got the bigger challenge, the subject matter jurisdiction. Okay. I've got the standard
[22:25.720 --> 22:33.280]  case law for such matter jurisdiction, challenges, timely subject matter jurisdiction cannot
[22:33.280 --> 22:38.920]  be waived and it may be raised at any point in the proceeding. Subject matter jurisdiction
[22:38.920 --> 22:46.760]  cannot be waived and can be raised any time. It's a trial. Anyway, one of them says no
[22:46.760 --> 22:55.320]  matter how remote in history, the primary case, Milo V versus US, this is a seminal
[22:55.320 --> 23:03.520]  case. While its jurisdiction is challenged and the court cannot proceed when it clearly
[23:03.520 --> 23:08.880]  appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach the merits,
[23:08.880 --> 23:16.880]  but rather should dismiss to dismiss the action. A court generally may not rule on the merits
[23:16.880 --> 23:23.440]  of a case without first determining that it has jurisdiction over the category of claim
[23:23.440 --> 23:31.320]  in the suit. Okay. Court must prove jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction is an essential
[23:31.320 --> 23:37.920]  part of the authority of a court to decide a case and it is never to be presumed and
[23:37.920 --> 23:43.320]  cannot be waived. The reviewing court determines whether subject matter jurisdiction exists
[23:43.320 --> 23:52.880]  as a question of law, subject to de novo review. Okay. Court presumed not to have jurisdiction.
[23:52.880 --> 24:02.100]  Okay. In general, the party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of demonstrates
[24:02.100 --> 24:11.040]  its existence. That's not what I wanted. In cases removed, there is a presumption that
[24:11.040 --> 24:16.440]  a federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and the party seeking to invoke federal jurisdiction
[24:16.440 --> 24:23.240]  must affirmatively allege the facts supporting it. I'm not finding the one I want. Anyway,
[24:23.240 --> 24:27.960]  we won't waste any more time on this. I've got a whole section on jurisdiction.
[24:27.960 --> 24:41.640]  When I talked to the judge of JP court three, the new judge, he says, your citation is considered
[24:41.640 --> 24:53.640]  a complaint because it is a class C misdemeanor. And I told him that, in fact, I have not waived
[24:53.640 --> 25:01.680]  the filing of a sworn complaint and that he has no written waiver by me waiving a complaint
[25:01.680 --> 25:07.000]  and that they have no jurisdiction. I am challenging jurisdiction. I said it's in my motion.
[25:07.000 --> 25:14.360]  Okay. We're going to go to a different place to challenge jurisdiction.
[25:14.360 --> 25:26.840]  So in his mind... Here's where we're going to go. Look at the citation. Demand to appear
[25:26.840 --> 25:34.360]  on and be honored before. What does your citation say concerning appearance?
[25:34.360 --> 25:45.800]  It says, and I quote, you are hereby notified to appear before, colon, Judge Honorable Tony
[25:45.800 --> 25:55.120]  Johnson in Cherokee County, JP court, precinct two, place one, on or before Friday, May 13th,
[25:55.120 --> 25:58.640]  10 a.m. On or before. Okay.
[25:58.640 --> 26:02.400]  Yes. When a person is cited under the Texas transportation
[26:02.400 --> 26:07.800]  code, the authority to release the person on a promise to appear is contained in Texas
[26:07.800 --> 26:15.480]  transportation code 543.006, which reads as follows. Notice to appear required, person
[26:15.480 --> 26:21.880]  not taken before magistrate. An officer who arrests a person for a violation of this subtitle
[26:21.880 --> 26:27.120]  punishable as a misdemeanor and who does not take the person before a magistrate shall
[26:27.120 --> 26:33.360]  issue a written notice to appear in court showing the time and place the person is to
[26:33.360 --> 26:40.280]  appear. The offense charged, the name and address of the person charged, and if applicable,
[26:40.280 --> 26:49.320]  the license number of the person's vehicle. Time and place. Time, honor before is not
[26:49.320 --> 26:56.320]  a time. Okay. And that's important to get more specific here shortly.
[26:56.320 --> 27:01.800]  It does say 10, it says honor before Friday, May 13th, 2016, 10 a.m.
[27:01.800 --> 27:03.800]  Honor before. Specific time.
[27:03.800 --> 27:11.120]  Did you appear before that date and time? Yes.
[27:11.120 --> 27:20.040]  Were you brought before a magistrate? Well, I appeared on May 13th at 9 a.m. and
[27:20.040 --> 27:27.200]  the magistrate was Judge Johnson and he received me at the clerk window.
[27:27.200 --> 27:37.280]  Oh, perfect. Okay. Because it goes on more. Time and place to appear, 543.006. The time
[27:37.280 --> 27:42.680]  specified in the notice to appear must be at least 10 days after the date of arrest
[27:42.680 --> 27:47.360]  unless the person arrested demands an earlier hearing. The place specified in the notice
[27:47.360 --> 27:53.040]  to appear must be before a magistrate having jurisdiction of the offense who is in the
[27:53.040 --> 27:59.000]  municipality or county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed. Before
[27:59.000 --> 28:10.640]  a magistrate, what can a magistrate do? What's your question?
[28:10.640 --> 28:18.440]  What can a magistrate do? A magistrate can only do three things.
[28:18.440 --> 28:24.720]  He can marry people. That's where he makes a little extra money. He can hold an examining
[28:24.720 --> 28:33.880]  trial and he can set bail. That's it. That's what a magistrate does.
[28:33.880 --> 28:43.160]  Did the magistrate hold an examining trial? No, and they claim that they will only hold
[28:43.160 --> 28:50.320]  an examining trial for felony cases. Good. We don't care what they claim. Okay.
[28:50.320 --> 28:55.520]  Is the accusation allegated? Okay, it's gone down.
[28:55.520 --> 29:02.720]  Arresting officer was not a police officer. We maintain that the officer acted outside
[29:02.720 --> 29:08.240]  the scope of his authority by purporting to exert an authority not granted by the constitution
[29:08.240 --> 29:14.240]  or subsequent legislation and was therefore acting under color of non-existing authority.
[29:14.240 --> 29:18.920]  According to 543.008, text transportation code, if an officer violates the provision
[29:18.920 --> 29:26.440]  of section 543.005 through 543.007, said officer is guilty of misconduct in office, violation
[29:26.440 --> 29:33.400]  of law by a public official relating to the office of said official, which has the effect
[29:33.400 --> 29:39.360]  of denying the citizen in the due course of the law, the state detectives violation 39.03
[29:39.360 --> 29:46.360]  penal code. Such violations of law being... Break, break, break. I'm about to go to break.
[29:46.360 --> 29:51.920]  Okay. We'll get to the really good part next. I'll get to the crazy part. This is so nuts.
[29:51.920 --> 29:58.920]  Randy Kelton, Vet Pack, Wubla Radio. We'll be right back.
[30:21.920 --> 30:47.880]  What is it about opening the fridge at midnight that brings out the ravenous munchie monster
[30:47.880 --> 30:52.840]  in all of us? It's not your imagination. Scientists say fattening food may actually
[30:52.840 --> 30:57.560]  be more tempting when we're tired. That's because the prefrontal cortex, the part of
[30:57.560 --> 31:02.600]  the brain that handles self-control, starts slacking off when you start nodding off.
[31:02.600 --> 31:06.920]  Harvard researcher William Kilgore showed people photos of fattening foods like French
[31:06.920 --> 31:12.200]  fries and cheesecake. The brains of well-rested adults sent inhibition signals warning them
[31:12.200 --> 31:17.760]  to steer clear, but the brains of sleepy people were less likely to object, making them more
[31:17.760 --> 31:23.800]  likely to indulge. Take those potato chips away. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news
[31:23.800 --> 31:32.120]  and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. Did you know there are three million edible
[31:32.120 --> 31:37.680]  food plants on earth, and none have the nutritional value of the hemp plant? Hempusa.org offers
[31:37.680 --> 31:43.920]  you hemp protein powder. It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100%
[31:43.920 --> 31:49.480]  gluten-free. Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds
[31:49.480 --> 31:56.360]  the body the nutrients it needs. Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can
[31:56.360 --> 32:03.680]  do for you, only at hempusa.org. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule
[32:03.680 --> 32:07.680]  of Law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. If we,
[32:07.680 --> 32:10.880]  the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand
[32:10.880 --> 32:14.680]  and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place
[32:14.680 --> 32:18.040]  to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right
[32:18.040 --> 32:22.400]  to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn
[32:22.400 --> 32:26.960]  how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy, A. Craig,
[32:26.960 --> 32:30.240]  in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching
[32:30.240 --> 32:34.080]  tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts
[32:34.080 --> 32:39.000]  to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[32:39.000 --> 32:42.440]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:42.440 --> 32:46.960]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009
[32:46.960 --> 32:50.680]  seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how
[32:50.680 --> 32:54.560]  to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order
[32:54.560 --> 33:19.560]  your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[33:19.560 --> 33:26.720]  We are back. We're in Kelton. Back with our radio. We're talking to Tommy in Texas. Now
[33:26.720 --> 33:38.680]  we get to the good part. Tommy, who may enforce the Texas Transportation Code? The Department
[33:38.680 --> 33:54.600]  of Public Safety, troopers. Who else? Anyone that has been certified in their training
[33:54.600 --> 34:01.160]  and meets a specific location requirement as outlined. Yeah. You're kind of familiar
[34:01.160 --> 34:08.800]  with it. I'm going to go through this for everybody else. I got your seminar. Mine or
[34:08.800 --> 34:17.080]  Eddie's? Well, the one that you were at, you and Eddie and Deborah. Oh, okay. Okay. Who
[34:17.080 --> 34:22.440]  may enforce the Texas Transportation Code? This question is answered in Texas Administrative
[34:22.440 --> 34:31.760]  Code Rule 4.13 as follows. Authority to enforce. An officer of the department may stop, enter,
[34:31.760 --> 34:38.360]  or detain on a highway or on a port of entry. It's the motor vehicle that is subject to
[34:38.360 --> 34:45.760]  Texas Transportation Code 644. A non-commissioned employee of the department that is trained
[34:45.760 --> 34:53.720]  and certified, and they're saying the department, this section of the administrative code goes
[34:53.720 --> 34:58.920]  to the Department of Public Safety. An officer of the department for a non-commissioned employee
[34:58.920 --> 35:04.120]  of the department that is trained and certified to enforce the federal safety regulations
[35:04.120 --> 35:10.000]  may prohibit the further operations of the vehicle. Municipal police officers from any
[35:10.000 --> 35:16.760]  of the Texas cities meeting the training and certification requirements contained in subsection
[35:16.760 --> 35:24.000]  B of this section and certified by the department may stop, enter, or detain on a highway or
[35:24.000 --> 35:30.120]  a port of entry within the municipality, a motor vehicle subject to Texas Transportation
[35:30.120 --> 35:42.680]  Code 644. Now, let's go to 644.101, certification of certain peace officers. The department
[35:42.680 --> 35:48.400]  shall establish procedures including training for the certification of municipal police
[35:48.400 --> 35:53.800]  officers, sheriffs, and deputy sheriffs to enforce this chapter. A police officer of
[35:53.800 --> 36:02.320]  any of the following municipalities is eligible to apply for certification under this section.
[36:02.320 --> 36:12.640]  So, this is who can apply for certification. Okay, get ready to go to Wonderland. We're
[36:12.640 --> 36:19.720]  stepping through the looking glass. A municipality with a population of 50,000 or more, a municipality
[36:19.720 --> 36:26.600]  with a population of 25,000 or more, any part of which is located in a county with a population
[36:26.600 --> 36:34.320]  of 500,000 or more. The municipality with a population of less than 25,000, any part
[36:34.320 --> 36:42.320]  of which is located in a county with a population of 3.3 million and that contains or is adjacent
[36:42.320 --> 36:49.240]  to an international airport. A municipality with a population of at least 34,000 that
[36:49.240 --> 36:56.560]  is located in a county that borders two or more states. A municipality, any part of which
[36:56.560 --> 37:03.080]  is located in a county bordering the United Mexican states. A municipality with a population
[37:03.080 --> 37:11.120]  of less than 5,000 that is located adjacent to a bay connected to the Gulf of Mexico and
[37:11.120 --> 37:18.520]  in a county adjacent to a county with a population greater than 3.3 million. A municipality that
[37:18.520 --> 37:25.480]  is located within 25 miles of an international airport and in a county that does not contain
[37:25.480 --> 37:31.000]  a highway that is part of the national system of interstate and defense highways and is
[37:31.000 --> 37:37.520]  adjacent to a county with a population of 3.3 million or more. The municipality with
[37:37.520 --> 37:47.880]  a population of 8,500, of less than 8,500, that is the county seat and contains a highway
[37:47.880 --> 37:54.360]  that is part of the national system of interstate and defense highways. A sheriff or a deputy
[37:54.360 --> 38:01.160]  sheriff over a county bordering the United Mexican states or other county with a population
[38:01.160 --> 38:06.960]  of 1 million or more is eligible to apply for certification in this section. A sheriff,
[38:06.960 --> 38:12.200]  a deputy sheriff or any peace officer that does not attend continuing education courses
[38:12.200 --> 38:17.280]  on the enforcement of traffic and highway laws and on the use of radar equipment as
[38:17.280 --> 38:23.160]  prescribed in Subsection F, Chapter 1701, Occupations Code shall not enforce traffic
[38:23.160 --> 38:31.760]  and highway laws. The department by rule shall establish reasonable fees sufficient to recover
[38:31.760 --> 38:37.680]  from the municipality or county the cost of certifying as peace officer in this section.
[38:37.680 --> 38:51.800]  Okay. Where were you stopped, Tommy? State Highway 21. It was a rural part of the highway
[38:51.800 --> 39:06.880]  by a state trooper. That changes everything. All of this doesn't apply. Because a state
[39:06.880 --> 39:15.320]  trooper can enforce the traffic code. Okay. Next part, now we go to, since none of this
[39:15.320 --> 39:24.480]  applies, I won't read all of this. There's more on this issue. The next thing goes to
[39:24.480 --> 39:37.680]  what in the citation establishes that you were operating in commerce. No part of the
[39:37.680 --> 39:50.120]  citation. Then you do, the citation on its face failed to allege the necessary elements
[39:50.120 --> 40:05.640]  sufficient to make you subject to the statutory scheme. And I agree with you on that. However,
[40:05.640 --> 40:12.880]  what's going to happen, the judge Grimes in the new court is telling, told me that I must
[40:12.880 --> 40:18.720]  show up before, on or before July 14th. If I don't show up on July 14th, he's going
[40:18.720 --> 40:27.160]  to plead not guilty for me. And he says he will, the judge of JP court three, the new
[40:27.160 --> 40:36.760]  court says to me, I will not move forward on your case until you make a plea. Okay.
[40:36.760 --> 40:45.680]  This is, this document doesn't have an argument that I'm looking for. What authority does
[40:45.680 --> 40:55.200]  the judge have to order you to appear? Oh, here we go. Demand, denial of examining trial
[40:55.200 --> 41:01.160]  by design. Okay. In the instant case is clear that when the officer issued citation, the
[41:01.160 --> 41:07.160]  officer intended that defendant appear before the trial court and an arraignment hearing.
[41:07.160 --> 41:12.000]  An arraignment hearing is a hearing defined with a Texas code of criminal procedure article
[41:12.000 --> 41:20.760]  26.02, which reads as follows, 26.02 purpose of arraignment and arraignment takes place
[41:20.760 --> 41:28.400]  for the purpose of fixing his identity and hearing his plea. Defendant upon filing it
[41:28.400 --> 41:34.560]  as the citation agreed to appear before an examining court as referenced above an examining
[41:34.560 --> 41:39.520]  court is held by a magistrate in the court of Texas code of criminal procedure chapter
[41:39.520 --> 41:47.600]  16 titled as follows, code of criminal procedure, title one code of criminal, title one code
[41:47.600 --> 41:54.440]  of criminal procedure, chapter 16, the commitment or discharge of the accused. It's a whole
[41:54.440 --> 42:02.680]  chapter on what the court must do in an examining court. In fact, the instant K in the instant
[42:02.680 --> 42:09.480]  case, the court had no power to summon defendant before an arraignment as such power is provided
[42:09.480 --> 42:16.920]  by Texas code of criminal procedure, chapter 26 at article 26.01, which reads as follows
[42:16.920 --> 42:26.640]  arraignment in all felony cases after indictment and all misdemeanor cases punishable by imprisonment.
[42:26.640 --> 42:33.000]  There shall be an arraignment. So class.
[42:33.000 --> 42:42.720]  I see misdemeanor, no confinement. Yes. So under what authority did the judge
[42:42.720 --> 42:47.560]  order you to appear before court? Okay. I have to look up one. We're about to go to
[42:47.560 --> 42:54.720]  break and I'll look it up on break. Uh, 28.01, I used to be able to quote the whole thing,
[42:54.720 --> 43:03.760]  but 28.01 Texas code of criminal procedure lists all of the things that a judge can order
[43:03.760 --> 43:11.400]  you to appear in court for, one of which is an arraignment hearing and what they're, and
[43:11.400 --> 43:24.800]  it's the only one that orders you to appear except for motions and motions and pleadings.
[43:24.800 --> 43:32.520]  There's nothing in there that would allow a justice or municipal court or justice court
[43:32.520 --> 43:42.480]  to order you to appear other than for pre-trial or for a motion hearing or for trial.
[43:42.480 --> 43:50.760]  I can't find it. Hang on. I'll look up their code over the break. Ready to tell me that
[43:50.760 --> 44:06.040]  back with our radio. We'll be right back. Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com
[44:06.040 --> 44:10.640]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904. Guadalupe street, sweet
[44:10.640 --> 44:15.280]  D here in Austin, Texas. I'm brave new books and chase pain to see all our fantastic health
[44:15.280 --> 44:19.960]  and wellness products with your very own eyes. Have a look at our miracle healing clay that
[44:19.960 --> 44:23.920]  started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a peek at some of our other wonderful
[44:23.920 --> 44:29.000]  products including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal
[44:29.000 --> 44:37.480]  silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's
[44:37.480 --> 44:44.920]  512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information
[44:44.920 --> 45:04.360]  on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.360 --> 45:11.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4 CD course
[45:11.120 --> 45:17.760]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer
[45:17.760 --> 45:23.560]  should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands
[45:23.560 --> 45:29.520]  have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[45:29.520 --> 45:35.440]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in
[45:35.440 --> 45:41.040]  a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[45:41.040 --> 45:46.680]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[45:46.680 --> 45:55.120]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[45:55.120 --> 46:14.800]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:14.800 --> 46:40.960]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton. My tongue got tongled. Randy Kelton back with La Radio
[46:40.960 --> 46:46.760]  and we're talking to Tommy in Texas. Tommy, I'm almost finished and now shut up. While
[46:46.760 --> 46:56.960]  we were on break, I pulled up 2801. I can figure out where I put it. Oh, here it is.
[46:56.960 --> 47:05.480]  Okay, 2801. The court may set any criminal case for a pretrial hearing before it is set
[47:05.480 --> 47:12.240]  for trial upon its merits and direct the defendant and his attorney, if any of record, and the
[47:12.240 --> 47:16.600]  state's attorney to appear before the court at the time and place stated in the court's
[47:16.600 --> 47:24.000]  order for a conference and hearing. The defendant must be present at the arraignment and his
[47:24.000 --> 47:35.120]  presence is required during any pretrial proceeding. Now, it says court's order for a conference
[47:35.120 --> 47:42.600]  and hearing. Let's go back. We'll address conference. The pretrial hearing shall be
[47:42.600 --> 47:48.840]  to determine any of the following matters. They can have a conference for the purpose
[47:48.840 --> 47:55.920]  of determining any of these matters. Arraignment of the defendant, if such be necessary. An
[47:55.920 --> 48:02.960]  appointment of counsel to request the defendant, if such be necessary. Pleadings of the defendant,
[48:02.960 --> 48:08.160]  also please, if any. Exceptions to the form or substance of the indictment. Motions for
[48:08.160 --> 48:14.080]  continuance either by the state or defendant. Motions to suppress evidence. Motion to change
[48:14.080 --> 48:22.160]  venue. Discovery. Entrapment. And motion for appointment of interpreter. When a criminal
[48:22.160 --> 48:27.480]  case is set for such pretrial hearing, any such preliminary matters not raised or filed
[48:27.480 --> 48:32.960]  seven days before the hearing will not thereafter be allowed to be raised or filed except by
[48:32.960 --> 48:42.440]  permission of the court. Okay, I won't read all the rest of this. They set that hearing.
[48:42.440 --> 48:53.700]  They can set it for these purposes listed here. At the hearing, they set none of these
[48:53.700 --> 49:04.280]  issues are raised or will be allowed to be raised. So, what authority does the court
[49:04.280 --> 49:12.440]  have to set this hearing? Well, they have not set the hearing yet. No, didn't you, weren't
[49:12.440 --> 49:23.200]  you required to be at the court? Yes, I was required to be at the court the initial appearance
[49:23.200 --> 49:32.640]  at the original JP2. What authority does the judge have to order you to appear at an initial
[49:32.640 --> 49:42.440]  appearance? I didn't see that in 2801. No, you're right. He does not. And the new judge
[49:42.440 --> 49:50.920]  that the venue has been changed to says there will only be a pretrial after I have made
[49:50.920 --> 49:57.400]  a plea. And if I don't make a plea on or before July 14th, he will make a plea for me and
[49:57.400 --> 50:07.080]  then set a pretrial. Then how did, so it goes to the question, where did he get authority
[50:07.080 --> 50:17.840]  to order you to appear in court? He, well, I believe that the new judge assumes his authority
[50:17.840 --> 50:25.000]  because he told me that the county attorney transferred the case to his court. No, no,
[50:25.000 --> 50:31.680]  that wasn't what I was getting at. I'm not saying that this court does not have a jurisdiction
[50:31.680 --> 50:43.560]  and venue. What I am saying is the court is limited in what it can do. Where is the, you
[50:43.560 --> 50:50.920]  can do anything you want to, but the public official may only do what he is specifically
[50:50.920 --> 50:58.040]  authorized to do. And you want to know where the judge got authority to order you to come
[50:58.040 --> 51:08.400]  to court to enter a plea. The only hearing I can find in Texas law where a defendant
[51:08.400 --> 51:18.320]  is required to enter a plea is an arraignment. But the court can't call an arraignment for
[51:18.320 --> 51:29.560]  a class C misdemeanor, 2601. So how did the court gain authority to make this order? And
[51:29.560 --> 51:33.040]  if you don't have that authority, official oppression.
[51:33.040 --> 51:41.000]  Okay. So actually, then in theory, he does not have the authority. And I'm wondering
[51:41.000 --> 51:48.760]  if I should even drive the two hours to this court on the 14th to see what he has to say
[51:48.760 --> 51:53.120]  or to demand or to file new motions. I don't know what I should do.
[51:53.120 --> 51:58.360]  You should file, go there and file an official oppression charge against him.
[51:58.360 --> 52:06.480]  This is, in the end, this is all about the politics.
[52:06.480 --> 52:08.480]  Right.
[52:08.480 --> 52:15.880]  So what you want to do is you start out with a criminal complaint against the magistrate
[52:15.880 --> 52:24.600]  for exerting or purporting to exert an authority he does not expressly have. And start this
[52:24.600 --> 52:30.160]  criminal complaint ball rolling. You also want to get some criminal complaints against
[52:30.160 --> 52:41.800]  the other judge and bring criminal complaints against the other judge to this judge.
[52:41.800 --> 52:49.920]  And he's going to tell you to give to the police department. You don't care what he
[52:49.920 --> 52:57.120]  does because you're bringing your little tar baby. And you say, here judge, you want to
[52:57.120 --> 53:03.080]  touch it? Go ahead. Tell me to go to the police department. That'll work for me.
[53:03.080 --> 53:14.120]  And then once you get this judge to refuse to take your complaints and you demand, you
[53:14.120 --> 53:25.560]  might want to write up a written demand to show authority, a petition, a motion to show
[53:25.560 --> 53:26.560]  authority.
[53:26.560 --> 53:33.080]  Can I send that motion in the mail or return certified mail?
[53:33.080 --> 53:39.080]  Absolutely. You might send the motion and the complaints against the JP, send them certified
[53:39.080 --> 53:48.000]  mail. Send each one separate. So each has a separate certified mail number on it.
[53:48.000 --> 54:00.880]  For the judge denying you access to the criminal court record. 1.27 Texas Code of Criminal
[54:00.880 --> 54:14.760]  Procedure. All courts shall be public. You can't withhold documents in a criminal prosecution
[54:14.760 --> 54:20.320]  from the defendant. They are public. You can't hold them from me. The charging instruments
[54:20.320 --> 54:27.440]  and anything to do with the prosecutor work product, they could withhold. But all the
[54:27.440 --> 54:33.800]  standard documents and everything that's filed in the public record, he must make available.
[54:33.800 --> 54:41.000]  Well, the vibe that I'm getting from both JP court judges is that they are essentially
[54:41.000 --> 54:46.640]  a puppet of the county attorney. The county attorney basically tells them what to say,
[54:46.640 --> 54:50.160]  what to do, when to go to the bathroom, apparently.
[54:50.160 --> 54:58.520]  Exactly. And they trust him. So you sting the judge for doing what the prosecutor told
[54:58.520 --> 55:08.600]  them to do. Here's the politics of this situation. Municipal court and JP judges believe that
[55:08.600 --> 55:17.560]  the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct will not take action against a duly elected
[55:17.560 --> 55:28.080]  county or district judge. Can they write? They also believe that the only judges the
[55:28.080 --> 55:34.920]  commission will take action against are municipal court and JP judges, judges of inferior courts,
[55:34.920 --> 55:42.860]  where the judge is not necessarily a lawyer. They believe that the Judicial Conduct Commission
[55:42.860 --> 55:48.360]  goes after these lower level judges in order to give the appearance that they are actually
[55:48.360 --> 55:57.200]  doing something. And they are right. That's exactly what the commission does. It scares
[55:57.200 --> 56:05.240]  double Jesus out of these guys when you file Judicial Conduct Complaints against them.
[56:05.240 --> 56:11.320]  That's exactly what you need to do. So if you file a Judicial Conduct Complaint against
[56:11.320 --> 56:16.040]  the first judge, the second judge is going to find out about it immediately. Then you
[56:16.040 --> 56:27.200]  send criminal complaints against the first judge to the second judge. The second judge
[56:27.200 --> 56:31.640]  is going to refuse to act on them. Now you take criminal complaints against both the
[56:31.640 --> 56:40.480]  judges and you send them to the county judge. And you ask the county judge to hold an examining
[56:40.480 --> 56:50.640]  trial on complaints against the second JP for not holding the examining trial on the
[56:50.640 --> 56:59.920]  complaints against the first JP. See how it stacks.
[56:59.920 --> 57:05.640]  And something else that is interesting about this courtesy notice of the new JP court,
[57:05.640 --> 57:13.080]  they sent with it a form for pleading guilty or not guilty or no lo contendere. And at
[57:13.080 --> 57:18.160]  the bottom it says, please return this to the court so that we can show that you did
[57:18.160 --> 57:25.560]  enter a plea. You may submit this in a cashier's check or money or payable to JP3 Cherokee
[57:25.560 --> 57:33.880]  County in order to keep from having warrants issued on above stated charges.
[57:33.880 --> 57:42.240]  It's confusing that essentially says to me that if I, and we'll use the reasonable person
[57:42.240 --> 57:48.440]  of ordinary prudent standard, that says to me that if I don't send them a check, they'll
[57:48.440 --> 57:51.440]  issue a warrant.
[57:51.440 --> 57:53.440]  Yeah.
[57:53.440 --> 58:03.800]  Oh, wonderful. This is kind of fun, especially if it's just the traffic today.
[58:03.800 --> 58:06.240]  And I guarantee you, when you do this.
[58:06.240 --> 58:09.240]  Are you telling me to send you an email? It's waiting for you.
[58:09.240 --> 58:16.240]  Okay. When you do this, every JP in Texas will know about it.
[58:16.240 --> 58:18.240]  Okay.
[58:18.240 --> 58:24.040]  When I filed criminal charges against the Texas Ranger for following policy, I told
[58:24.040 --> 58:30.200]  the prosecutor that I wanted, you know, I figured every other Ranger would find out
[58:30.200 --> 58:37.600]  about it. Yeah. He said, yeah, at about 45 seconds. Okay. Hang on. Randy Shelton, that
[58:37.600 --> 58:50.200]  pack was our radio. We'll be right back.
[58:50.200 --> 58:55.200]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America
[58:55.200 --> 59:00.880]  is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.880 --> 59:05.320]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.320 --> 59:09.800]  today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.800 --> 59:13.320]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.320 --> 59:18.600]  The free books are a three volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter
[59:18.600 --> 59:24.040]  by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation
[59:24.040 --> 59:29.840]  growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order your free New Testament Recovery
[59:29.840 --> 59:36.400]  Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at
[59:36.400 --> 01:00:02.600]  888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:02.600 --> 01:00:07.800]  Be following these flashes brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing you daily
[01:00:07.800 --> 01:00:15.400]  bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop
[01:00:15.400 --> 01:00:25.840]  into the tides of the alternatives. Markets for Friday the 8th of June 2016 are currently
[01:00:25.840 --> 01:00:34.240]  trending with gold at $1,365.91 an ounce, silver $20.22 an ounce, Texas crude $45.14
[01:00:34.240 --> 01:00:44.880]  a barrel and Bitcoin is currently sitting in about 662 U.S. currency.
[01:00:44.880 --> 01:00:50.600]  Today in history, the year 1947, reports are broadcast that a UFO crash landed in Roswell,
[01:00:50.600 --> 01:00:56.280]  New Mexico in what became known as the Roswell UFO Incident. By far the most cataloged, controversial
[01:00:56.280 --> 01:01:01.040]  and covered up UFO crash in American history, the Roswell Incident marks the beginning of
[01:01:01.040 --> 01:01:10.580]  modern day UFOlogy. Today in history, in recent news, during a peaceful anti-police brutality
[01:01:10.580 --> 01:01:16.320]  protest Thursday night in Dallas, Texas, 25-year-old Micah Xavier Johnson from Mesquite, Texas,
[01:01:16.320 --> 01:01:21.640]  a military veteran in the U.S. Army Reserve, from March 2009 to April 2015, and combat
[01:01:21.640 --> 01:01:26.560]  soldier with deployment in Afghanistan from late 2013 to mid-2014, who had no criminal
[01:01:26.560 --> 01:01:31.240]  record or known terror ties, suddenly began a police targeting sniper spree. Though Dallas
[01:01:31.240 --> 01:01:35.120]  police chief David Brown did suggest that other suspects assisted in the coordination
[01:01:35.120 --> 01:01:39.000]  along with law enforcement, previously stating that three people were in custody and that
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:43.600]  multiple shooters were involved, Johnson told negotiators that he was acting solo. The reason
[01:01:43.600 --> 01:01:47.840]  for his spree, as he then told them, was due to the two African American men recently shot
[01:01:47.840 --> 01:01:52.040]  by police in Louisiana and Minnesota. Five police officers were killed and seven officers
[01:01:52.040 --> 01:01:56.400]  wounded along with two non-law enforcement citizens who were also injured. Johnson was
[01:01:56.400 --> 01:02:01.240]  eventually killed by a bomb drone after several hours of standoff negotiations with police
[01:02:01.240 --> 01:02:05.600]  in a parking garage. Federal law enforcement are now saying that Johnson was the only shooter.
[01:02:05.600 --> 01:02:09.600]  This is just the deadliest of the shooting sprees that has been occurring nationwide,
[01:02:09.600 --> 01:02:19.240]  where gunmen in Tennessee, Missouri and Georgia have recently targeted and killed police officers.
[01:02:19.240 --> 01:02:23.320]  Google is testing new cryptography algorithms that hopefully quantum computing in the future
[01:02:23.320 --> 01:02:27.240]  might not be able to decipher. The fears that processing power offered by soon-to-emerge
[01:02:27.240 --> 01:02:31.800]  quantum computers could be enough to decrypt any Internet communications that were recorded
[01:02:31.800 --> 01:02:36.240]  today. So in order to preemptively future-proof today's Internet communications, Google is
[01:02:36.240 --> 01:02:40.240]  deploying what it's calling post-quantum cryptography, testing its effectiveness with
[01:02:40.240 --> 01:02:44.120]  their browser, Chrome Canary. For the test, they will be using a cryptographic algorithm
[01:02:44.120 --> 01:02:48.040]  called New Hope. However, with the test lasting two years, Google hopes it can replace the
[01:02:48.040 --> 01:02:53.960]  algorithm with something more up-to-date down the line.
[01:02:53.960 --> 01:03:20.680]  This is Brook Brody with your Lowdown for July 8th, 2016.
[01:03:20.680 --> 01:03:26.120]  Okay we are back, Randy Kelton back with our radio and we're talking to Tommy in Texas.
[01:03:26.120 --> 01:03:29.680]  Tommy, does this sound like fun so far?
[01:03:29.680 --> 01:03:33.560]  Oh I've been having a blast with it.
[01:03:33.560 --> 01:03:41.720]  One thing, as you bounce this up, you'll go to the county and then you'll go to the district
[01:03:41.720 --> 01:03:50.480]  judge. Do you still have the same district judge there? I'm trying to remember his name.
[01:03:50.480 --> 01:03:52.840]  Do you know who your district judge is?
[01:03:52.840 --> 01:03:57.880]  I think they have, well I'm not in Cherokee County, I'm in Montgomery County.
[01:03:57.880 --> 01:04:08.840]  Oh wonderful. So I was going to say don't file with the grand jury in Cherokee County
[01:04:08.840 --> 01:04:17.920]  because they prosecuted me for that. Horrendously illegal but they did it anyway. File against
[01:04:17.920 --> 01:04:27.520]  them in Montgomery County. I've only hammered Montgomery County once. That was a real habeas
[01:04:27.520 --> 01:04:32.880]  corpus that got all the justice judges of the court of criminal appeals put before a grand
[01:04:32.880 --> 01:04:39.280]  jury. So you stack these up, you file with the county court and when the county court
[01:04:39.280 --> 01:04:48.000]  refuses to act, you file against the county court with the district court. And one thing,
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:56.120]  when I was in Cherokee County, the county judge, when he found out I was filing an appeal,
[01:04:56.120 --> 01:05:03.000]  then he sent the prosecutor in to make a deal with me to make everything go away. This is
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:08.720]  after the jury found me guilty and gave me a year in jail. The prosecutor came in and
[01:05:08.720 --> 01:05:17.640]  made everything go away. The judge said when he referred to the court of appeals judges,
[01:05:17.640 --> 01:05:29.400]  he called them the gods in Tyler. They really are afraid of those guys. So I would suggest
[01:05:29.400 --> 01:05:34.960]  after you've done the district judge and he refuses to act, you file with each one of
[01:05:34.960 --> 01:05:44.760]  the three judges in Tyler, the court of appeals judges, their magistrates as well. And when
[01:05:44.760 --> 01:05:54.760]  they refuse to act, then you go to the Texas Supreme and file them with the chief justice
[01:05:54.760 --> 01:06:02.440]  of the Supreme. I've done that before. And then when he refuses to act, then you bring
[01:06:02.440 --> 01:06:11.360]  a complaint against him to the grand jury. When you look in the penal code under 2.09,
[01:06:11.360 --> 01:06:21.520]  I'm sorry, code of criminal procedure 2.09 that says who are magistrates? First one,
[01:06:21.520 --> 01:06:27.440]  justices of the Supreme court, judges of the court of criminal appeals, district judges,
[01:06:27.440 --> 01:06:36.760]  county judges, justice of the peace, municipal court judges, and recorders. First one, Supreme
[01:06:36.760 --> 01:06:44.360]  court justices. So you walk it all the way up the ladder. If you want to have even more
[01:06:44.360 --> 01:06:54.880]  fun with it, you might file a complaint with the Texas attorney general. Okay. Are you
[01:06:54.880 --> 01:07:06.600]  familiar with 2.03 code of criminal procedure? Neglect of duty? Yes. When there is a complaint
[01:07:06.600 --> 01:07:18.400]  against a public official, if you'll go back and look at 39.03, in 2012, they amended chapter
[01:07:18.400 --> 01:07:29.600]  39 to give the attorney general concurrent jurisdiction in allegations against public
[01:07:29.600 --> 01:07:38.880]  officials. So once you've done the chief justice, you take your complaint against the chief
[01:07:38.880 --> 01:07:45.800]  justice and send it to the attorney general. Now he's required to reduce the complaint
[01:07:45.800 --> 01:07:56.640]  and information submitted to the grand jury. And when he doesn't, you go down and they'll
[01:07:56.640 --> 01:08:03.040]  recognize the routine in Austin because I've done it a number of times. You go up to the
[01:08:03.040 --> 01:08:10.680]  bailiff, you go in the district courthouse in Austin, and to your left are elevators,
[01:08:10.680 --> 01:08:16.280]  to your right, you'll see an information desk and there's a walkway behind the information
[01:08:16.280 --> 01:08:22.240]  desk. You go in that walkway and there'll be two doors, one facing you, there's a little
[01:08:22.240 --> 01:08:29.600]  inlet inset place and two doors in there. The door to your right to district attorney's
[01:08:29.600 --> 01:08:34.480]  office, the door to your left is the grand jury. They open that door and there'll be
[01:08:34.480 --> 01:08:41.280]  a bailiff sitting there and you tell the bailiff your name and instruct the great foreman that
[01:08:41.280 --> 01:08:47.080]  I have business with the grand jury. She'll say or he'll say, may I tell him the nature
[01:08:47.080 --> 01:08:54.840]  of the business? Yes, you may give him these. And then instead of giving it to the grand
[01:08:54.840 --> 01:09:02.240]  jury, he'll give it to the Travis County District Attorney. But then we figure out what to do
[01:09:02.240 --> 01:09:13.080]  with it then. We go back to the attorney general and accuse the district attorney of secreting
[01:09:13.080 --> 01:09:22.880]  criminal complaints from the attorney general from the grand jury. Or maybe we take it
[01:09:22.880 --> 01:09:32.640]  to the court of criminal appeals and stick it on all 15 of those guys. Just think of
[01:09:32.640 --> 01:09:42.960]  the politics is so great. And every time you file against an official, every official in
[01:09:42.960 --> 01:09:51.680]  the state knows about it, especially JP's. But is Montgomery County going to allow me
[01:09:51.680 --> 01:09:57.680]  to the Montgomery County grand jury? They're going to allow me to see that grand jury against
[01:09:57.680 --> 01:10:06.880]  Cherokee County officials. Okay. District judge. You know, we used to have circuit judges.
[01:10:06.880 --> 01:10:12.880]  A district judge was a statewide judge and they would write a circuit. Well, we got enough
[01:10:12.880 --> 01:10:19.240]  people that we needed more judges to the point we got enough judges that they didn't have
[01:10:19.240 --> 01:10:29.960]  to write a circuit anymore. So each district judge was restricted to a venue. And it is
[01:10:29.960 --> 01:10:37.520]  a district judge that impanels a grand jury. And a grand jury is a statewide grand jury
[01:10:37.520 --> 01:10:45.400]  while each county has one. They're not county officials, they're state officials. And there
[01:10:45.400 --> 01:10:54.760]  is nothing in the code anywhere limiting the venue of a grand jury. The presumption is
[01:10:54.760 --> 01:11:03.480]  that since each county has a grand jury, that the grand jury's venue is limited to that
[01:11:03.480 --> 01:11:14.720]  county, but that doesn't appear in law anywhere. So you send it to the foreman of the grand
[01:11:14.720 --> 01:11:20.120]  jury. I have a letter from the foreman of Tarrant County grand jury saying, we examined
[01:11:20.120 --> 01:11:26.200]  into your accusations and find no Tarrant County offenses subject to indictment. Is
[01:11:26.200 --> 01:11:34.320]  that a fact, Jack? So I'll be filing against that grand jury foreman.
[01:11:34.320 --> 01:11:41.920]  Because everything that the grand jury is regarding is against the state of Texas, not
[01:11:41.920 --> 01:11:47.000]  against the county. It's against the peace and dignity of the state of Texas.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:56.760]  Exactly. And they're state officials. So then we go after the grand jury foreman. And what
[01:11:56.760 --> 01:12:09.160]  we want the grand jury foreman to do is tell us, the judge told me I had to do this. Because
[01:12:09.160 --> 01:12:17.800]  when the judge or the prosecutor gives the grand jury legal advice, they don't have any
[01:12:17.800 --> 01:12:26.520]  immunity for that. We get to go straight for them.
[01:12:26.520 --> 01:12:35.880]  So when I go by Thursday to see this JP court three, and he's going to demand a plea and
[01:12:35.880 --> 01:12:40.160]  I'm going to say, I've already filed a motion or a document.
[01:12:40.160 --> 01:12:50.360]  No, you say I am here at arm's length to the court. That means I'm not standing within
[01:12:50.360 --> 01:12:58.120]  your jurisdiction. I have a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction before the court. You
[01:12:58.120 --> 01:13:05.280]  will take no action until you have proven subject matter jurisdiction. And let him do
[01:13:05.280 --> 01:13:08.320]  whatever he wants to.
[01:13:08.320 --> 01:13:14.440]  Okay. And I'm not going to sign anything.
[01:13:14.440 --> 01:13:15.440]  Right.
[01:13:15.440 --> 01:13:21.760]  Okay. Well, look, Randy, thanks a lot. I will let you get to your next caller and I will
[01:13:21.760 --> 01:13:27.360]  keep you apprised of the situation. And remember, I did send that email to you. It's waiting
[01:13:27.360 --> 01:13:28.360]  on your email.
[01:13:28.360 --> 01:13:34.440]  All right. And if you see me, Mr. McClure, tell him I said hi.
[01:13:34.440 --> 01:13:35.760]  I will do that.
[01:13:35.760 --> 01:13:36.760]  Okay.
[01:13:36.760 --> 01:13:38.920]  Thank you, Randy. Thanks a lot.
[01:13:38.920 --> 01:13:44.760]  Thank you, Tommy. Okay. Now we're going to go to Terrence in Florida. Hello, Terrence.
[01:13:44.760 --> 01:13:46.520]  What do you have for us today?
[01:13:46.520 --> 01:13:55.480]  Well, hey, Randy. It's funny how you closed out with a word I wanted to inquire about.
[01:13:55.480 --> 01:13:56.480]  Okay.
[01:13:56.480 --> 01:14:08.920]  Or phrase or term. And that is standing at arm's length. And I was asking you for a couple
[01:14:08.920 --> 01:14:15.040]  of examples, like the one you just went through. You said, Judge, I'm standing here at arm's
[01:14:15.040 --> 01:14:16.040]  length.
[01:14:16.040 --> 01:14:25.840]  Yeah. And that means, that just means I'm not stipulating to your jurisdiction or venue.
[01:14:25.840 --> 01:14:35.040]  Okay. And he says, well, did the officer write you a ticket? And you respond with...
[01:14:35.040 --> 01:14:45.640]  Objection relevance. No, wait. You know, when you go there, in order to stand at arm's length
[01:14:45.640 --> 01:14:55.800]  to the court, you must have raised a written challenge to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:14:55.800 --> 01:15:06.120]  Then when you've done that, the judge doesn't question you. Hold on, Judge. You don't question
[01:15:06.120 --> 01:15:15.040]  me until you've proven subject matter jurisdiction. That's why I'm at arm's length. Once you've
[01:15:15.040 --> 01:15:21.960]  made a ruling on my challenge, subject matter jurisdiction, then we'll talk about question
[01:15:21.960 --> 01:15:22.960]  and answer.
[01:15:22.960 --> 01:15:30.760]  Okay. What would he need to do to demonstrate subject matter jurisdiction?
[01:15:30.760 --> 01:15:42.680]  He would have to prove that there is a regulatory scheme in place in the state of Florida. He
[01:15:42.680 --> 01:15:54.080]  must prove that the complaint must establish the elements sufficient to show that you are
[01:15:54.080 --> 01:16:02.640]  subject to the statutory scheme. And that requires that they show that you're operating
[01:16:02.640 --> 01:16:10.440]  in commerce. And it must be stated in the complaint. Otherwise, the complaint's insufficient.
[01:16:10.440 --> 01:16:15.440]  Okay. And that would come from the prosecutor or your accuser.
[01:16:15.440 --> 01:16:23.040]  No, that's in the... You look at the face of the complaint. The judge cannot move beyond
[01:16:23.040 --> 01:16:25.240]  the four corners of the complaint.
[01:16:25.240 --> 01:16:26.240]  Right.
[01:16:26.240 --> 01:16:35.360]  If the complaint is insufficient, he can't bring in testimony from the officer to repair
[01:16:35.360 --> 01:16:40.640]  the complaint. The complaint's insufficient. They would have to redo the complaint. Hang
[01:16:40.640 --> 01:16:45.960]  on. We're about to go to break. Randy Kelton. That PAC, we will be on radio. Our caller
[01:16:45.960 --> 01:17:00.160]  number is 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.160 --> 01:17:05.480]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.480 --> 01:17:09.880]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. Michael Mears has won
[01:17:09.880 --> 01:17:15.480]  six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step
[01:17:15.480 --> 01:17:20.800]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:17:20.800 --> 01:17:25.560]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. How to answer letters and
[01:17:25.560 --> 01:17:29.960]  phone calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial
[01:17:29.960 --> 01:17:33.720]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.720 --> 01:17:38.840]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[01:17:38.840 --> 01:17:44.280]  consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:44.280 --> 01:17:49.560]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's
[01:17:49.560 --> 01:17:59.040]  ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[01:17:59.040 --> 01:18:00.040]  now.
[01:18:00.040 --> 01:18:06.120]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network?
[01:18:06.120 --> 01:18:10.520]  On top of the on-air talent, producers, and other hard-working individuals working behind
[01:18:10.520 --> 01:18:14.800]  the scenes, Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners
[01:18:14.800 --> 01:18:19.320]  like you. And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year in our annual
[01:18:19.320 --> 01:18:23.440]  fundraisers, which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:18:23.440 --> 01:18:28.800]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution. Every $25 donation enters
[01:18:28.800 --> 01:18:33.560]  you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. First prize being a Spike
[01:18:33.560 --> 01:18:37.920]  Skull Lower Receiver. Second prize being a Taurus Curve. Ten winners will receive gift
[01:18:37.920 --> 01:18:42.400]  cards from All About Vapor. And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will
[01:18:42.400 --> 01:18:47.240]  also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud. Donations by all major credit cards are
[01:18:47.240 --> 01:18:52.520]  accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin. The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser. Head on
[01:18:52.520 --> 01:18:57.280]  over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network
[01:18:57.280 --> 01:19:00.280]  on the air.
[01:19:00.280 --> 01:19:29.280]  Okay, we are back. We're into Kelton. We're back with the radio. And we're back with the
[01:19:29.280 --> 01:19:42.240]  radio and we're talking to Terrence in Florida. Okay. This is about how the system works.
[01:19:42.240 --> 01:19:48.740]  When you file a challenge subject matter jurisdiction, let me step back one step. When a complaint
[01:19:48.740 --> 01:19:57.040]  is filed with the court, the court is presumed to have jurisdiction and will act as if it
[01:19:57.040 --> 01:20:03.840]  has jurisdiction unless the jurisdiction is challenged. Once the jurisdiction is challenged,
[01:20:03.840 --> 01:20:12.960]  the presumption of jurisdiction is abolished. Now it is the duty of the court to prove jurisdiction.
[01:20:12.960 --> 01:20:21.080]  And you mentioned the court asking you questions. No, no, no. We're not going there yet. You
[01:20:21.080 --> 01:20:31.280]  have to prove jurisdiction, not me. So in order to have jurisdiction, the court must
[01:20:31.280 --> 01:20:37.760]  be able to show not only does it have general jurisdiction over the subject matter and venue
[01:20:37.760 --> 01:20:49.440]  over you personally or venue over the case itself and in personum jurisdiction over you,
[01:20:49.440 --> 01:20:56.120]  in personum jurisdiction over you is where they run into problems. Because in order to
[01:20:56.120 --> 01:21:02.680]  accrue in personum jurisdiction over you, you must first establish that you fall within
[01:21:02.680 --> 01:21:09.000]  the regulatory scheme. And that's a problem when you have a commercial transportation
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:18.960]  code and you're applying it to non-commercial travelers. They don't have in personum jurisdiction
[01:21:18.960 --> 01:21:25.640]  because you are not subject to the statutory scheme. In order to make you subject to the
[01:21:25.640 --> 01:21:33.760]  statutory scheme, the complaint itself would have to allege that you were operating on
[01:21:33.760 --> 01:21:39.800]  the streets or highways of the state of Florida in commerce.
[01:21:39.800 --> 01:21:48.600]  But aren't you required to be presumed innocent before you even have to go through all that
[01:21:48.600 --> 01:21:51.000]  other stuff? How do they get-
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:56.120]  Wait a minute. I didn't understand that. Can you say that again?
[01:21:56.120 --> 01:22:02.480]  Aren't you supposed to be presumed innocent? How do you get to Haffey to go to personum
[01:22:02.480 --> 01:22:03.480]  and-
[01:22:03.480 --> 01:22:15.280]  Oh, no, no, no. You don't have to prove personum. They have to. They haven't got to you yet.
[01:22:15.280 --> 01:22:20.000]  It's presumed they have jurisdiction until you file a challenge to it. Now they don't
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:26.840]  have that presumption. You're presumed to be innocent until they have produced prima
[01:22:26.840 --> 01:22:32.240]  facie evidence in accordance with the rules of evidence to give a reasonable person of
[01:22:32.240 --> 01:22:36.400]  ordinary prudence reason to believe a crime had been committed and you committed the crime.
[01:22:36.400 --> 01:22:42.360]  Once that's done, your presumption of innocence overcome. So let's back up to subject matter
[01:22:42.360 --> 01:22:49.320]  or jurisdiction. Once it's challenged, then the presumption is overcome. They have to
[01:22:49.320 --> 01:22:55.360]  prove they have jurisdiction over the subject matter and over you.
[01:22:55.360 --> 01:23:02.600]  So the person returned to the accused.
[01:23:02.600 --> 01:23:08.800]  Once they do that, then it turns back to you.
[01:23:08.800 --> 01:23:17.800]  Now they got the answer. That process should start with the agency before it gets to court,
[01:23:17.800 --> 01:23:18.800]  correct?
[01:23:18.800 --> 01:23:27.600]  Right. The officer. That's why I spoke to those two information requests earlier. I
[01:23:27.600 --> 01:23:33.320]  ran them by Tommy, but Tommy got stopped by a DPS officer and I didn't get to one thing
[01:23:33.320 --> 01:23:40.280]  he needs to check. He needs to make the DPS here enforces the traffic code. But their
[01:23:40.280 --> 01:23:47.720]  problem is the DPS doesn't, they think that any peace officer can enforce the traffic
[01:23:47.720 --> 01:23:57.560]  code. So the DPS has certain officers designated as DOT officers and they're the only ones
[01:23:57.560 --> 01:24:06.120]  that have to have these training requirements. That's what they think, but actually the code
[01:24:06.120 --> 01:24:11.880]  says anybody who enforces traffic code has to have it. So we check to see if they are
[01:24:11.880 --> 01:24:17.360]  designated a DOT officer. If they're not, they can't enforce it either. So look at Florida
[01:24:17.360 --> 01:24:31.440]  law. Look at the authority given to the Florida state troopers. Do they have DOT officers?
[01:24:31.440 --> 01:24:38.960]  That'll give you a clue. You might ask them, do you have DOT officers that specialize in
[01:24:38.960 --> 01:24:44.080]  trucks and such? They'll probably tell you they do and the rest of them don't go through
[01:24:44.080 --> 01:24:53.560]  all those procedures. That's one way to get them. And then you look at the face of the
[01:24:53.560 --> 01:25:07.120]  complaint and see if it states that you were observed operating a commercial motor vehicle
[01:25:07.120 --> 01:25:12.360]  in commerce. It must state facts to support that you were in commerce in order to bring
[01:25:12.360 --> 01:25:17.400]  you within the regulatory scheme. And I sound like I'm harping on this and it's because
[01:25:17.400 --> 01:25:24.440]  I am. This is of critical importance. Keep in mind your only purpose in the trial court
[01:25:24.440 --> 01:25:31.840]  is to set the record for appeal. So you don't care what the judge does. You're there to
[01:25:31.840 --> 01:25:44.640]  make the claim. Let me step back a moment. Have you made any kind of an initial appearance?
[01:25:44.640 --> 01:25:54.080]  Me? No. But what I want to establish is like in Merrill versus federal crop insurance.
[01:25:54.080 --> 01:26:03.080]  The court ruled that there's no way any man could know all these rules and regulations
[01:26:03.080 --> 01:26:10.280]  and laws. Yeah, that's in Merrill. But I don't want to go through all this with the court
[01:26:10.280 --> 01:26:18.040]  and the judge. There's got to be a faster, simpler way. No, you can't use Merrill that
[01:26:18.040 --> 01:26:27.200]  way. Merrill versus national crop insurance. It's a seminal case that says if a government
[01:26:27.200 --> 01:26:37.480]  official lies to you and you rely on his lie and you're harmed thereby, tough. Right. It's
[01:26:37.480 --> 01:26:43.440]  not that. It's that the rules are so voluminous that no reasonable man could be expected to
[01:26:43.440 --> 01:26:48.720]  know everything that's going on to be bound by anything in particular unless it was right
[01:26:48.720 --> 01:26:59.840]  in his face. That one is, there's no way that's supportable because every person is given
[01:26:59.840 --> 01:27:08.200]  imputed knowledge of the law. Ignorance of the law is not a defense to prosecution. Public
[01:27:08.200 --> 01:27:12.640]  officials- Writing for a stranger to walk up, a cop to walk up and start throwing laws
[01:27:12.640 --> 01:27:17.080]  at you, it doesn't apply to you. You got to be able to say to the judge something more
[01:27:17.080 --> 01:27:26.880]  to the effect of, sir, what on that citation constitutes probable cause to an effective
[01:27:26.880 --> 01:27:34.680]  arrest without a warrant and deceased property. And his answer is, there's nothing here that
[01:27:34.680 --> 01:27:40.280]  does that. And you say, then I require that you let me be and you order him to let me
[01:27:40.280 --> 01:27:49.040]  be. And it should be that simple, Randy. It shouldn't be all this. Well, according to
[01:27:49.040 --> 01:27:56.920]  section 247 of 72, 43 of 1849 and 1988. No, no, no. It's got to be a little more right
[01:27:56.920 --> 01:28:03.120]  in the face of the judge. Judge, this guy's trying to entice you into helping him commit
[01:28:03.120 --> 01:28:07.920]  a crime against me. He has no authority to do what he does unless you can show me where
[01:28:07.920 --> 01:28:12.680]  he's demonstrated that on that citation. And if he hasn't, you've got to tell him to let
[01:28:12.680 --> 01:28:22.680]  me be and you got to let me be. Wait, I'm not sure I'm really wrapped my head around
[01:28:22.680 --> 01:28:30.760]  what your position was. My position was, did I cause anybody harm? No. This guy with the
[01:28:30.760 --> 01:28:36.040]  gun told me to come here and talk to you. You've got to stop him and tell him to let
[01:28:36.040 --> 01:28:43.960]  me be. Okay. Okay. Under law, you have to be able to get to that spot. And what you're
[01:28:43.960 --> 01:28:52.880]  doing is presuming certain jurisdictional issues that shouldn't be presumed. I'm presuming
[01:28:52.880 --> 01:29:00.600]  that no one has anything on me. No, but you're going to the merits. No, I didn't say I wasn't
[01:29:00.600 --> 01:29:04.240]  speeding. I said, this guy has no right to talk to me and point a gun at me and demand
[01:29:04.240 --> 01:29:10.840]  I give him money and you help them do it. Okay. That I could overcome easily enough
[01:29:10.840 --> 01:29:20.680]  with the code. The code is a civil contract. And by your presence within the boundaries
[01:29:20.680 --> 01:29:28.080]  of the jurisdiction, you are adhered to the contract. It's an adhesion contract. That's
[01:29:28.080 --> 01:29:38.880]  just hogwash. You may think it's hogwash, but you will go to jail thinking it's hogwash.
[01:29:38.880 --> 01:29:48.800]  There is a way to do this, but just presuming something's not it. Now we can get there.
[01:29:48.800 --> 01:29:54.480]  You're starting, you're kind of starting in the middle. Hang on. I'll explain this when
[01:29:54.480 --> 01:30:03.320]  we come back. Randy Kelton, VetPak, Wheelbarradio, we'll be right back. A decade ago, automobile
[01:30:03.320 --> 01:30:08.680]  crashes were the leading cause of death by injury in America. But in recent years, car
[01:30:08.680 --> 01:30:13.720]  accidents have been surpassed by a much more disturbing cause of death. I'm Dr. Catherine
[01:30:13.720 --> 01:30:19.080]  Albrecht and I'll tell you what it is in a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you
[01:30:19.080 --> 01:30:23.520]  give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is
[01:30:23.520 --> 01:30:29.080]  gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say
[01:30:29.080 --> 01:30:35.320]  no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:30:35.320 --> 01:30:40.920]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.920 --> 01:30:48.360]  Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage. Here's some bad news we haven't seen since
[01:30:48.360 --> 01:30:54.160]  the Great Recession. Today, suicide takes more American lives than any other injury.
[01:30:54.160 --> 01:31:00.040]  Car accidents were the leading cause of death until 2009. That year, nearly 40,000 Americans
[01:31:00.040 --> 01:31:05.640]  committed suicide, making it the leading cause of injury-related death. While suicides increased
[01:31:05.640 --> 01:31:11.320]  15% that decade, deaths from poisoning more than doubled. Researchers believe many of
[01:31:11.320 --> 01:31:17.640]  those prescription drug overdoses may be intentional, which would raise the suicide rate even higher.
[01:31:17.640 --> 01:31:22.200]  If you're feeling down, reach out for help. There are more resources available today than
[01:31:22.200 --> 01:31:27.600]  ever before. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search
[01:31:27.600 --> 01:31:36.600]  engine. This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.600 --> 01:31:42.080]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:31:42.080 --> 01:31:46.000]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:50.560]  lives. And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.560 --> 01:31:53.720]  I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force
[01:31:53.720 --> 01:31:58.760]  pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to
[01:31:58.760 --> 01:32:03.840]  RememberBuilding7.org today. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did
[01:32:03.840 --> 01:32:07.720]  your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the
[01:32:07.720 --> 01:32:11.480]  government caused it with their Kim Trails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.480 --> 01:32:15.240]  Okay, I might be kidding about the Kim Trails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why
[01:32:15.240 --> 01:32:19.200]  you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you
[01:32:19.200 --> 01:32:24.480]  with little to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member
[01:32:24.480 --> 01:32:29.160]  of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:32:29.160 --> 01:32:37.040]  to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to
[01:32:37.040 --> 01:32:41.800]  hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate
[01:32:41.800 --> 01:32:46.520]  another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. So if those
[01:32:46.520 --> 01:32:55.000]  out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. That's 512-992-8745 or
[01:32:55.000 --> 01:32:59.520]  hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement. May not
[01:32:59.520 --> 01:33:05.320]  actually be kidding about Kim Trails. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[01:33:05.320 --> 01:33:22.160]  LogosRadioNetwork.com. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Backpack News, Live Radio. We're
[01:33:22.160 --> 01:33:27.880]  talking to you in St. Florida. Over the break, I'm struggling trying to figure out how to
[01:33:27.880 --> 01:33:37.560]  address this point, because I've come across this before, and it's a common law consideration.
[01:33:37.560 --> 01:33:45.120]  But the problem is... Randy, before you go on, let me say I'm standing at arm's length,
[01:33:45.120 --> 01:33:51.920]  where I want to be. Okay, go ahead. Okay, you have to establish first that you're at
[01:33:51.920 --> 01:33:59.400]  arm's length. And this is a statutory issue, not a common law issue. So the common law
[01:33:59.400 --> 01:34:09.160]  here does not apply. In order for the statute to apply, they must establish jurisdiction
[01:34:09.160 --> 01:34:18.080]  under the statute. So before we get to any merits, before I say to them, I haven't done
[01:34:18.080 --> 01:34:24.120]  anything wrong, proves that I have. No, you ain't getting that from me, Bebba. We ain't
[01:34:24.120 --> 01:34:30.720]  getting there yet. You got some hurdles to come over. Before you come and talk to me,
[01:34:30.720 --> 01:34:37.520]  you have to show that you have statutory power to do that. You have certain requirements
[01:34:37.520 --> 01:34:45.640]  you must meet. And the first one is, is you have to prove that I fall within the statutory
[01:34:45.640 --> 01:34:55.560]  scheme. Oh, we not even talking. Now, as to who's the injured party, most states have
[01:34:55.560 --> 01:35:03.800]  a statute that says a violation of this code... In the matter of a violation of this code,
[01:35:03.800 --> 01:35:08.480]  the state is the injured party. So they make the state the injured party as a matter of
[01:35:08.480 --> 01:35:17.120]  law. It's kind of a horse manure way of getting around that argument, but we don't even need
[01:35:17.120 --> 01:35:26.320]  to get there. First thing, jurisdiction, who are you? Why are you bothering me? How did
[01:35:26.320 --> 01:35:35.520]  you get authority over me? And in traffic, the first thing they must establish is that
[01:35:35.520 --> 01:35:47.160]  the officer is authorized to enforce first. Then they must establish all of the elements
[01:35:47.160 --> 01:35:56.560]  of jurisdiction, venue, and the elements of the crime itself. Then you must demonstrate
[01:35:56.560 --> 01:36:03.280]  that they followed all the due process statutory requirements. A breach of your due process
[01:36:03.280 --> 01:36:10.640]  rights makes them trespassers ab initio from the beginning. So we don't even get to the
[01:36:10.640 --> 01:36:17.080]  merits. Once you get to the merits, then the judge is in a position to exercise discretion
[01:36:17.080 --> 01:36:26.240]  and he will always exercise discretion against you. He's just there to make the money. And
[01:36:26.240 --> 01:36:32.080]  in the end, it's not about the facts or the law, it's all about the money. I know that
[01:36:32.080 --> 01:36:39.360]  sounds kind of cynical, but it's not intended to be. I'm an engineer. And as an engineer,
[01:36:39.360 --> 01:36:48.760]  I don't really have philosophies. I just have knowledge of how it works. We figure out,
[01:36:48.760 --> 01:36:53.160]  we're engineers, we figure out how things work and we do it that way. If we have an
[01:36:53.160 --> 01:36:59.720]  opinion about it, we can express it all we want to, but first figure out how things work
[01:36:59.720 --> 01:37:04.680]  and do it that way. One example I heard from a guy named Jim Rowan, who was an excellent
[01:37:04.680 --> 01:37:09.240]  speaker. He said this big humongous thing, it rises up in the sky, hangs there for a
[01:37:09.240 --> 01:37:14.400]  while, boom, crashes to the ground. Big humongous thing, rises back up, hangs there, crashes
[01:37:14.400 --> 01:37:20.280]  to the ground. Now you might think that's a stupid idea, but first get out from under
[01:37:20.280 --> 01:37:27.880]  it, get snatched, figure out how things work and do it that way. So that's kind of the
[01:37:27.880 --> 01:37:35.360]  philosophy of what we do here. Instead of trying to impose the way we think things ought
[01:37:35.360 --> 01:37:45.520]  to be, I go in and look at what are the laws you are purporting to enforce. Let me see
[01:37:45.520 --> 01:37:51.840]  those and I'll take those and beat you over the head with them. I have yet to find a single
[01:37:51.840 --> 01:37:59.240]  jurisdiction who followed the laws they purport to enforce. When you take their laws and cram
[01:37:59.240 --> 01:38:07.160]  them down their throats, it's a whole lot harder for them to swallow. So I appreciate
[01:38:07.160 --> 01:38:14.280]  your position, but I've had a lot of guys go to jail, doing what they believe is right
[01:38:14.280 --> 01:38:22.520]  and doing what actually is right. This is not how things work. Does that make sense,
[01:38:22.520 --> 01:38:23.520]  Jarence?
[01:38:23.520 --> 01:38:28.680]  Well, that's all we've got. Thank you very much.
[01:38:28.680 --> 01:38:32.960]  Okay. Do you don't have any other questions?
[01:38:32.960 --> 01:38:40.800]  No, I just got to be man to man. I got a state wanting money from me after I moved away from
[01:38:40.800 --> 01:38:46.720]  home. I didn't want five years worth of money, but I didn't live there for those five years.
[01:38:46.720 --> 01:38:52.520]  So I'm writing letters. I was writing the governor a letter.
[01:38:52.520 --> 01:39:01.000]  Well, this part's a little hard to get your head wrapped around, but once you do, you
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:08.200]  will be amazed at how powerful it is. I just went into court yesterday and the judge knew
[01:39:08.200 --> 01:39:18.920]  me real well and he was not happy, but he was extremely careful because he knew, I'm
[01:39:18.920 --> 01:39:24.440]  holding out a tar baby here. You mess with me and next week you'll have the sky falling
[01:39:24.440 --> 01:39:31.720]  in on you from somewhere else. So he didn't want anything to do with me. And the way we're
[01:39:31.720 --> 01:39:40.840]  going to get this country back is taking them to task in their own law. Thank you for calling
[01:39:40.840 --> 01:39:44.320]  Terrence and I hope I haven't offended you.
[01:39:44.320 --> 01:39:47.080]  Not at all. Not at all.
[01:39:47.080 --> 01:39:53.760]  This part is a struggle. We have some guys out there preaching what we affectionately
[01:39:53.760 --> 01:40:02.680]  call Patriot mythology. Stuff that sounds good and is intuitively satisfying, but people
[01:40:02.680 --> 01:40:09.120]  wind up getting in trouble. You remember the 1099 OID thing.
[01:40:09.120 --> 01:40:14.280]  It boils down to a duel is what it boils down to. You boil it down. It's either you let
[01:40:14.280 --> 01:40:16.680]  me be, or I got to take you.
[01:40:16.680 --> 01:40:22.960]  Well, that's kind of what I'm doing to them is you let me be, or I'll take your law, the
[01:40:22.960 --> 01:40:30.560]  one you pretend to follow and I'll beat the crap out of you with it. And whenever you
[01:40:30.560 --> 01:40:36.520]  deal with me, I'm always trying to set you up. I'm trying to get you to do something.
[01:40:36.520 --> 01:40:40.880]  You know, I have a rule here. Never ask a public official to do anything you actually
[01:40:40.880 --> 01:40:46.840]  want them to do because you never ask them to do anything that law doesn't require them
[01:40:46.840 --> 01:40:51.200]  to do. And then when they don't do it, you get to clobber them. You have to go somewhere
[01:40:51.200 --> 01:40:56.000]  else and clobber them. So they don't even know it's happening until it comes at them
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:00.240]  from somewhere else. And they have to look around to figure a while to figure out how
[01:41:00.240 --> 01:41:05.000]  they got clobbered. I do like Bushwhack.
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:15.240]  Okay. Thank you, Terrence. We've got one more segment and one more caller. Okay. Now we're
[01:41:15.240 --> 01:41:21.480]  going to go to Jay in Georgia. Hello, Jay. What do you have for us today?
[01:41:21.480 --> 01:41:27.840]  Oh, Randy Kelton, I'm Jay. And I've talked to you a couple of weeks ago about a situation
[01:41:27.840 --> 01:41:35.880]  with a house post foreclosure. I think we shared, it was me and another caller. And
[01:41:35.880 --> 01:41:41.360]  you mentioned a little bit about what you do and how you look at the original documents
[01:41:41.360 --> 01:41:46.240]  and find a fraudulent violations there. Yes.
[01:41:46.240 --> 01:41:51.720]  I was interested in possibly pursuing that. And I know you're a busy man. Obviously I've
[01:41:51.720 --> 01:41:57.280]  emailed you at a rule of law, but I wanted to know if we, and I don't want to waste people's
[01:41:57.280 --> 01:42:00.720]  time on this. I know you have people that are fighting for their very freedom and that
[01:42:00.720 --> 01:42:05.560]  you're helping on this show. So they may have, you know, a higher.
[01:42:05.560 --> 01:42:11.600]  We have a lot of people fighting foreclosure. This is one of my major subjects.
[01:42:11.600 --> 01:42:19.080]  Okay. Well, how would I go about doing that? What would the cost in it be? Would it be
[01:42:19.080 --> 01:42:24.120]  a better time for me to call you maybe sometime during the week? Is that a possibility?
[01:42:24.120 --> 01:42:25.120]  Yes. Okay.
[01:42:25.120 --> 01:42:33.760]  Send me another email. I don't remember seeing an email from you. I was expecting one.
[01:42:33.760 --> 01:42:40.800]  Okay. I did twice, but you never know. I mean, what if I put something in the subject line
[01:42:40.800 --> 01:42:44.840]  like Thomas Jefferson? Just put something in the subject line in
[01:42:44.840 --> 01:42:50.000]  all caps. Thomas Jefferson in all caps in subject line.
[01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:56.920]  I will absolutely read that. Outstanding. Okay.
[01:42:56.920 --> 01:43:04.360]  In order for me to do this, I do an evaluation of the public record. I've helped about close
[01:43:04.360 --> 01:43:09.960]  to 700 people file federal lawsuits. I've filed a whole bunch of quiet title actions
[01:43:09.960 --> 01:43:15.480]  and in doing all of these, I've been seeing the things that judge dismissed for, judges
[01:43:15.480 --> 01:43:24.680]  dismissed for, and I've been working down to something they cannot effectively get around
[01:43:24.680 --> 01:43:33.240]  and everything has backed me away from these common arguments. Show me the note and bifurcation
[01:43:33.240 --> 01:43:41.760]  of the note and deed of trust and MERS issue. I don't even take on MERS. I don't care about
[01:43:41.760 --> 01:43:47.280]  MERS. Everything has driven me back to what's filed in the public record.
[01:43:47.280 --> 01:43:49.000]  Yeah. Yeah.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:57.680]  Okay. Hang on. Go into the last break. We'll be right back.
[01:43:57.680 --> 01:44:06.520]  Non-GMOsolutions.com is now a proud sponsor of the Logos Radio Network with promo code
[01:44:06.520 --> 01:44:11.880]  Logos. We thank you for the opportunity to be your source for new man of foods, the leader
[01:44:11.880 --> 01:44:17.760]  in high quality food that you will truly enjoy. You'll find gluten free options and all products
[01:44:17.760 --> 01:44:23.800]  are free from high fructose corn syrup, aspartame, soy, and MSG. Whether you're on a tight budget,
[01:44:23.800 --> 01:44:28.720]  looking for options to reduce food costs without compromising health or securing long-term
[01:44:28.720 --> 01:44:34.720]  25-year storable food for an uncertain future, then Non-GMOsolutions.com is your common sense
[01:44:34.720 --> 01:44:40.480]  answer. Take advantage of a 10% discount with promo code Logos. No longer will you compromise
[01:44:40.480 --> 01:44:45.600]  taste and quality for full-term shelf life or eat poor quality food due to cost. Check
[01:44:45.600 --> 01:44:52.040]  out our FlexPay options and design a no-contract plan to satisfy your needs. Go to Non-GMOsolutions.com
[01:44:52.040 --> 01:44:58.560]  today and get 10% off with promo code Logos. That's Non-GMOsolutions.com with promo code
[01:44:58.560 --> 01:44:59.560]  Logos.
[01:44:59.560 --> 01:45:07.480]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary,
[01:45:07.480 --> 01:45:14.160]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.160 --> 01:45:20.800]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:45:20.800 --> 01:45:26.120]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and
[01:45:26.120 --> 01:45:32.960]  now you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[01:45:32.960 --> 01:45:38.920]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.920 --> 01:45:44.400]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[01:45:44.400 --> 01:45:51.440]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[01:45:51.440 --> 01:46:11.760]  more. Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:11.760 --> 01:46:30.720]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, VetPak, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking today in Georgia.
[01:46:30.720 --> 01:46:39.280]  And everything has driven me back to the public record. And the primary is it's real easy
[01:46:39.280 --> 01:46:49.840]  to wrap your head around. The primary tenet of the public recorder's office is if you
[01:46:49.840 --> 01:46:58.840]  have a claim against real property, you must file that claim with the recorder so that
[01:46:58.840 --> 01:47:03.400]  say I want to buy this piece of property, I need to know if there are any claims against
[01:47:03.400 --> 01:47:14.760]  this property. So the first recorder was set up in 1635 at Plymouth. When the Pilgrims
[01:47:14.760 --> 01:47:21.720]  got here, they set up a recording system so that people could keep track of claims on
[01:47:21.720 --> 01:47:28.240]  properties. This is how important this has been. Every state has a statute similar to
[01:47:28.240 --> 01:47:38.320]  13.001 Texas Property Code, and it says, any claim against real property not properly acknowledged
[01:47:38.320 --> 01:47:47.840]  or proven and filed in the public record is void as to the holder. So I don't care who
[01:47:47.840 --> 01:47:58.960]  the bona fide holder of the note is. I only care who has a proper claim filed in the public
[01:47:58.960 --> 01:48:09.400]  record. And when I evaluate the records, I look for chain of holder status. We spoke
[01:48:09.400 --> 01:48:16.120]  earlier, the other person that was on the line with you, Jay, was Doug in Ohio, and
[01:48:16.120 --> 01:48:21.320]  he was just on earlier, and we spoke about his. I looked at his. I've got a mortgage
[01:48:21.320 --> 01:48:34.080]  by FMF Financial LLC 2006. So when I see that, if it's not one of the major banks, the first
[01:48:34.080 --> 01:48:43.680]  thing I do is go on the internet and run the name. First hit I got, FMF Financial LLC closes
[01:48:43.680 --> 01:48:56.200]  its doors in 2007. So I look in the record. I see a deed of trust to FMF. I don't see
[01:48:56.200 --> 01:49:07.200]  an assignment before FMF went out of business. So this was an asset of FMF. They didn't assign
[01:49:07.200 --> 01:49:15.680]  this asset to anyone else, and FMF was a person under law, a person in the form of illegal
[01:49:15.680 --> 01:49:27.440]  fiction. Well, that person died in 2007 without transferring its claim to some other party.
[01:49:27.440 --> 01:49:38.360]  So five years later in 2011, four years later, along comes MERS and claims to be acting for
[01:49:38.360 --> 01:49:49.960]  FMF and its successors in a science. And I say, huh? So how does that work? Even if you
[01:49:49.960 --> 01:49:57.840]  were an agent for FMF in 2006, when FMF went out of business, you cease to be their agent.
[01:49:57.840 --> 01:50:06.560]  So how did FMF crawl out of the grave and say to you, Hey, Mr. MERS guy, I want you
[01:50:06.560 --> 01:50:14.840]  to take my asset and give it to somebody else. Judge Shrek in New York called it vampire
[01:50:14.840 --> 01:50:21.560]  lenders. So this is the kind of thing I'm looking for. You got to break in the chain
[01:50:21.560 --> 01:50:29.440]  of title. This is a whole lot easier for a judge to wrap his head around. This is not
[01:50:29.440 --> 01:50:39.440]  rocket science. It's old, very old law, older than the United States. These recording systems
[01:50:39.440 --> 01:50:48.880]  have been in place. The laws relating to them are very well established. If I own something
[01:50:48.880 --> 01:50:55.760]  and I die without transferring it to somebody else, it goes into probate. But if I'm a legal
[01:50:55.760 --> 01:51:05.640]  fiction, my assets don't go into probate. If I die while still holding those assets,
[01:51:05.640 --> 01:51:15.000]  those assets are abandoned. Really? Yeah. Who gets to claim? Very interesting. Yeah.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  Who can say, you know, we've got Wells Fargo saying, Oh, well, we hold this note. Well,
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:26.320]  how did you get this note? Oh, we got it from a dead guy. Oh, so would you dig it up out
[01:51:26.320 --> 01:51:38.600]  of grave? And even if you're holding the note in your hand, you're not a holder of the note.
[01:51:38.600 --> 01:51:47.520]  So this is the biggest problem that the banks have. And I think they sent us after the bifurcation
[01:51:47.520 --> 01:51:56.840]  of the note and the merge issue just to keep us from going where the real problem is. So
[01:51:56.840 --> 01:52:03.760]  I'm going to look real careful at everything that's filed. What was filed? Who filed it?
[01:52:03.760 --> 01:52:12.760]  What authority did they have to file it? And while I'm pretty up on the statutes for Texas,
[01:52:12.760 --> 01:52:21.440]  every other state is going to have a similar set of statutes. This is a standard issue
[01:52:21.440 --> 01:52:27.120]  and it's pretty easy to handle. Before these bankers came along, we had people trying to
[01:52:27.120 --> 01:52:33.360]  steal property. For the last couple thousand years have people trying to steal everything.
[01:52:33.360 --> 01:52:39.760]  So the laws have been well honed and well established to prevent some third party from
[01:52:39.760 --> 01:52:46.560]  coming in and stealing your property. The banks bought judges and the judges are trying
[01:52:46.560 --> 01:52:55.600]  to say the banks can steal anything you want to. But they have a problem if we craft our
[01:52:55.600 --> 01:53:04.640]  arguments correctly. You always want to craft your argument in a way such that if the appeals
[01:53:04.640 --> 01:53:11.840]  court rules against you, it becomes citable. It will undermine serious aspects of other
[01:53:11.840 --> 01:53:18.680]  things. So the court's going to have to look at their decision and say, I got about 10,000
[01:53:18.680 --> 01:53:26.080]  shysters out there that want to take my opinion and use it to bad purpose. So they got to
[01:53:26.080 --> 01:53:37.680]  be real careful. This is so basic to property. I charge to do this because it is real time
[01:53:37.680 --> 01:53:46.560]  consuming. But I don't charge until I've looked at what you got. Then I look and estimate
[01:53:46.560 --> 01:53:51.440]  how much time it's going to take me. It's not going to take any time at all. I just
[01:53:51.440 --> 01:53:59.240]  give it back to you and show you what to do. But generally, my output is a lawsuit. I write
[01:53:59.240 --> 01:54:09.480]  my evaluations in the form of a quiet title action. So one of the things I have when I
[01:54:09.480 --> 01:54:17.720]  get reports from other people is I tell people, in law, never make a proactive statement of
[01:54:17.720 --> 01:54:23.000]  law out of your own mouth. And I read this stuff that says, oh, they can't do this. They
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:29.400]  can't do this. You can't do this. And I said, what is that crap? I can't do anything with
[01:54:29.400 --> 01:54:36.280]  that. What it has to say is, according to such and such a case, you can't do this. The
[01:54:36.280 --> 01:54:43.960]  court said in this instance, you can't do that. That's what I mean. Never make proactive
[01:54:43.960 --> 01:54:49.640]  statement of law out of your own mouth. Always make it out of the mouth of the court. So
[01:54:49.640 --> 01:54:56.200]  when I write my documents, I struggle. It's hard to catch all of them. It's so easy for
[01:54:56.200 --> 01:55:02.680]  us to do. But I struggle to make this thing read like a well-prepared lawsuit. So you
[01:55:02.680 --> 01:55:07.880]  take it to any lawyer and have them adjust it to what they're doing and take an action
[01:55:07.880 --> 01:55:14.360]  in your favor. So I charge between 500 and 1,000 depending on how complex it is.
[01:55:14.360 --> 01:55:15.360]  Okay.
[01:55:15.360 --> 01:55:21.920]  It's just kind of ballpark. So if anybody wants me to look at theirs, I'm certainly open.
[01:55:21.920 --> 01:55:29.240]  Just let me know. But mainly, this is how we do it. We pull the document, open it up,
[01:55:29.240 --> 01:55:35.760]  look at what it is, and look at the date that it's been filed. And then save as your last
[01:55:35.760 --> 01:55:44.680]  name, space, the year in numbers, dash, the month in numbers, dash, the day in numbers,
[01:55:44.680 --> 01:55:51.920]  space, and then what the document is. When you use the international date code that way
[01:55:51.920 --> 01:56:00.000]  with the year, then the month, then the day, it will order the documents by year first,
[01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:07.520]  by month second, by day third. So everything will be in chronological order. That's half
[01:56:07.520 --> 01:56:13.880]  of my job. Because once you've got them all in chronological order, you can look down
[01:56:13.880 --> 01:56:19.680]  the line and it's real easy to tell where something's missing. And when I find things
[01:56:19.680 --> 01:56:25.360]  missing, you know, a lot of times I come back to the client and say, you know, because of
[01:56:25.360 --> 01:56:29.600]  this document and this document, there has to be something else in between. And it helps
[01:56:29.600 --> 01:56:37.280]  me fill in empty gaps. And it's pretty easy to see where something's missing. And you
[01:56:37.280 --> 01:56:41.280]  know, all of my documents I save this way now. And the reason I put the name on the
[01:56:41.280 --> 01:56:50.680]  front is I've got lots of research files. If I get a file in the wrong place, and I
[01:56:50.680 --> 01:56:55.120]  have that problem all the time, I have one browser that saves things anywhere it wants
[01:56:55.120 --> 01:57:01.920]  to. So if I save a file and I can't find it, I just do a search for the last name, bang,
[01:57:01.920 --> 01:57:07.920]  it pops them all up and tells me where they're at. But mainly when it drops it in a folder,
[01:57:07.920 --> 01:57:11.480]  everything is exactly in order and it makes it really easy to understand. Does that make
[01:57:11.480 --> 01:57:21.520]  sense, Jay? It does. It does. And I can tell you that mine was originally done by, you
[01:57:21.520 --> 01:57:26.720]  know, a no name that was at the closing. And then it was sold to country wide. And from
[01:57:26.720 --> 01:57:33.200]  there, it went all over the place. And the only... Okay, okay, hold on, hold on. Let's
[01:57:33.200 --> 01:57:41.440]  be careful. The only thing I care about is what does the public record say happened to
[01:57:41.440 --> 01:57:50.400]  your note? That's all you know. It's the public record in my county says that the house, the
[01:57:50.400 --> 01:57:55.800]  deed was transferred from that original inception of the loan to country wide and then no one
[01:57:55.800 --> 01:58:07.480]  else. Okay. Nobody else can come to the table. That's why... Was the note transferred, the
[01:58:07.480 --> 01:58:17.800]  security transfer to country wide before the original lender went out of business? Right.
[01:58:17.800 --> 01:58:25.400]  That's it. Okay. We are out of time. Contact me by email tomorrow, Jay and we'll talk.
[01:58:25.400 --> 01:58:30.560]  We will. Randy Kelton, Vet Pack, Rule of Law Radio. Thank you all for listening. We'll
[01:58:30.560 --> 01:58:38.440]  be back next week. Same time, same station. Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:38.440 --> 01:58:50.560]  Thank you.
[01:58:50.560 --> 01:58:56.640]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.640 --> 01:59:02.080]  recovery version. The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.080 --> 01:59:07.640]  what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of
[01:59:07.640 --> 01:59:16.680]  life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.680 --> 01:59:23.600]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:23.600 --> 01:59:30.280]  13,000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.280 --> 01:59:34.840]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament
[01:59:34.840 --> 01:59:46.560]  recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at
[01:59:46.560 --> 02:00:06.560]  bfa.org. Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com.